alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit21.1**

 

Listof Subsidiaries of the Company:

 
| **Name of Entity**                 | ** ** | **State of Incorporation** |
|------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|
|                               |       |                       |
| United  Sugars Corporation         |       | Minnesota                  |
|                               |       |                       |
| Midwest  Agri-Commodities Company  |       | Minnesota                  |
|                               |       |                       |
| ProGold  Limited Liability Company |       | Minnesota                  |
|                               |       |                       |
| Crystech,  LLC                     |       | Delaware                   |
|                               |       |                       |
| Sidney  Sugars Incorporated        |       | Minnesota                  |
|                               |       |                       |
| Crab  Creek Sugar Company          |       | Minnesota                  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S208]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           MEASURES REFERRED

  The following bills were read the first and the second times by 
unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

       H.R. 35. An act to amend chapter 22 of title 44, United 
     States Code, popularly known as the Presidential Records Act, 
     to establish procedures for the consideration of claims of 
     constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of 
     Presidential records; to the Committee on Homeland Security 
     and Governmental Affairs.
       H.R. 36. An act to amend title 44, United States Code, to 
     require information on contributors to Presidential library 
     fundraising organizations; to the Committee on Homeland 
     Security and Governmental Affairs.

                          ____________________
```
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2010- 01 9 f 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED y 

DOCKET OST- /£f - O / <^^ ACT'ON DATE jd^j f ^ /^ / ^0 1 O 

This approval and grant of antitrust immunity is subject, where applicable, 

to conditions previously imposed. 

This action is effective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFR 385.30 or a review is undertaken on the Department's own motion. 

In view of the agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

the above Mecfflure, the 21-dayBcnQdJa 14 CFR 303.42 is waived. 

30 July 2010 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

lATA Washington, 

601 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 300 - North Building 

Washington DC 20004
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-41063

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Mack Hinojosa, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:19-CR-669-1

Before King, Smith, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Mack Hinojosa appeals the 84-month sentence imposed following his 

guilty plea conviction for possession of a firearm and ammunition by a 

convicted felon. He argues that the district court erred by denying his request 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-41063 Document: 00515545219 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/28/2020
No. 19-41063

2

for a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under § 3E1.1(a)–

(b) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines.

We review a district court’s refusal to grant an offense-level reduction

for acceptance of responsibility “with even greater deference” than clear 

error review. United States v. Buchanan, 485 F.3d 274, 287 (5th Cir. 2007). 

This Court will not reverse a denial of a reduction under § 3E1.1 unless the 

decision is “without foundation.” United States v. Juarez-Duarte, 513 F.3d 

204, 211 (5th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

In determining whether a reduction under § 3E1.1 applies, the district 

court may consider the defendant’s “voluntary termination or withdrawal 

from criminal conduct or associations.” U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1 cmt. n.1(B) (U.S. Sentencing Comm’n 

2018); cf. United States v. Watkins, 911 F.2d 983, 985 (5th Cir. 1990). Here, 

the district court’s denial of a § 3E1.1 reduction was not without foundation

because it was based on the district court’s finding that, after his guilty plea 

and while in custody, Hinojosa engaged in conduct in violation of the law and 

prison rules when he struck, or attempted to strike, a correctional officer. See

Juarez-Duarte, 513 F.3d at 208, 211.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-41063 Document: 00515545219 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/28/2020
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00144-CR

Christopher Arthur Kurtz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. CR2014-343, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E

A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D T O A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a 

brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of 

the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and 

file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate 

record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely 

filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to 

provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written 

verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or 

before June 25, 2015. See id. at 321.
It is ordered on June 15, 2015.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Do Not Publish
----

----

| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period      ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                          |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |

| Date:  November 6,      2009 | /s/ Thomas B. Specketer            |   |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                        | Thomas      B. Specketer           |   |
|                                        | Vice      President and Controller |   |
|                                        | (principal      financial officer) |   |

----

----
**EXHIBIT
        15**
 
 **AWARENESS
        LETTER OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 MidAmerican
        Energy Company
 Des
        Moines, Iowa
 
 We
        have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
        Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited consolidated
        interim financial information of MidAmerican Energy Company and subsidiary
        for
        the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
        as indicated in our report dated November 2, 2007; because we did not
        perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
 
 We
        are
        aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, is
        incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-142663 on
        Form S-3.
 
 We
        also
        are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
        Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement
        prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified
        by an
        accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
        Act.
 
 
 /s/
        Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
 Des
        Moines, Iowa
 November 2,
        2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  
<ARTICLE>      5      
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
THIRD QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000928735
<NAME>         STORAGE TRUST REALTY
<MULTIPLIER>   1000
       
<S>                   <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                               2,990
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                          618
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     4,516
<PP&E>                             379,263
<DEPRECIATION>                     (15,836)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     371,349  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               17,273
<BONDS>                            123,820
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                               129
<OTHER-SE>                         214,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       371,349
<SALES>                             42,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    43,812
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       13,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     9,581
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   5,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     14,604
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 14,604
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        14,604
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                         1.13
        

</TABLE>
# OSTI Web Measurement and Tracking Opt-Out

As you use this website, OSTI collects web measurement and tracking data. For full details see User Privacy under Website Policies and Important Links. If you do not wish to participate in this web measurement and tracking activity, you may opt-out of this information collection by clicking on the opt-out button on this page.

 To opt-out, it is necessary to install a cookie on your computer. This cookie identifies that you have opted-out. If you delete the opt-out cookie, if you change computers or Web browsers, or upgrade your existing browser, you will need to opt-out again.

I wish to be excluded from web measurement and tracking.
Close AlertYou have now successfully opted out of OSTI Web traffic reporting.
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated October 14, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2044 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-248585) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 14, 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

PETER P. BARNETT,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2606 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 175 DB 2018

Attorney Registration No. 73120

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2019, upon consideration of the Recommendation 

of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition in Support of 

Discipline on Consent is granted, and Peter P. Barnett is suspended on consent from the 

Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of two years. Respondent shall comply with all 

the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to 

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
EXHIBIT
15
 
 AWARENESS
LETTER OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 MidAmerican
Energy Company
 Des
Moines, Iowa
 
 We have
reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited consolidated interim financial
information of MidAmerican Energy Company and subsidiary for the periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, as indicated in our report dated August 8,
2008; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.
 
 We are
aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-142663 on
Form S-3.
 
 We also
are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement
prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.
 
 
 /s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
 Des
Moines, Iowa
 August 8,
2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0338

IN THE MATTER OF:

J.W., 

A YOUTH IN NEED OF CARE.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Thomas F. Sapp 

is granted an extension of time to and including September 19, 2023, 

within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on 

appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 31 2023

07/31/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0338
SUPI:lRIOR COURT OF 11m STATI:l OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNlY OF KERN 

# ICf 

# o 

# Public __

**HfC!~** ease Number 

# Narcn 1;32011 DECLARA110N OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 

## C.C.P.) Sta'c of California, County ofKern, 

### ss: Declarant 

### says: TII8t 

### at all 

### times, herein mentioned deci1U1111t 

### Is and was 

### a cltlzen of tho United States, over lhc 

### ago oftwenty-onc 

### years, and not a party to nor 

### Interested In lhc 

### within lll8.lkt; that declarant 

### Is tho principal clerk of the printer and tho publisher ofnm 

### DAJL YJNDBPENDBNT, a J10Wllpap« ofgeneral ciroulatlon printed and published dally In lhc City of Ridgec:re$1, Indian Wells Judicial District, County ofKern, 

### state ofCalifornia, 

### which m>WSpaper 

### bas been 

### M,judged a 

### IIOWSJ>all« ofgeneral 

### c!rculatlon by tho said 

### Superior Court by 

### order 

### llllldc and renewed July 

### 8, 1952, 

### In Civil Procoodlng 

### No. S8S84 

### ofsaid 

### Court; that 

### the 

### ln.stnm1em ofwhich 

### the llllllOXed In 

### aprioted ccipy 

### has been 

### published In 

## CfCh regUlar and 

### 11ko 

### lssuo of

### said nowspapor (and not any supplement thereof) on tho (ollowln& 

### dates, to-wit:

I clcclarc> und«paWiy of:pecjulytbat lbo ....,.,Is 111111.00 llOmd. 

### BXECUTBD



# 0~ftk?JW()JUf (/ .20ft,at Ridgoccest 

### California. . - "/ /

**·~** .,_...,
l 

### ,,
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 725 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-407, K2025-405.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27197 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                            EXHIBIT 10(iii)(a)39

WHEREAS AT&T entered into an employment agreement with Ms.Bernard dated April 9,
2001; and

Whereas it was the intent of Ms. Bernard's employment agreement to make up for
significant forfeitures that she experienced as a result of accepting employment
with AT&T; and

Whereas at the time she began employment negotiations with AT&T she was in the
process of establishing Nevada as her primary residence after her retirement
from her former employer.

Whereas Nevada residency would have resulted in significant savings of state
income taxes in 2001 on income from her former employer; and

Whereas due to the length and complexity of the AT&T negotiations, Ms. Bernard
was not able to finalize the residency change in a timely manner, resulting in
her having to pay Colorado state income taxes of $434,427.06 related to income
from her former employer; and

Whereas, after reduction for the federal tax deduction, Ms. Bernard's net tax
liability for Colorado state income taxes is $341,434.06; and

Whereas, had this incremental tax liability been known at the time her
employment contract was being negotiated, a make-up payment for this tax
liability would have been made a component of her employment agreement; and

Whereas it is desirable for the Board of Director of the Company to approve a
special payment to help offset this incremental state income tax liability.

NOW THEREFORE, be it:

RESOLVED: that a special payment in the amount of $341,434.06 is authorized to
help to offset the incremental tax liability and shall be paid as soon as
practicable.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 17, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-968

Lower Tribunal No. F07-33060

________________

John A. Andrews,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Zachary James, Judge.

John A. Andrews, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
-  Newsroom 
          Archive
Fact Sheets
News Releases
Social Media
Stories

# News Archive

### Biden-Harris Administration Announces Availability of $725 Million from Investing in America Agenda to Clean Up Legacy Pollution

June 1, 2023

DOI today announced that nearly $725 million from President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law is available to 22 states and the Navajo Nation to create good-paying jobs and catalyze economic opportunity by reclaiming AML sites.

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

### Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Announces More Than $4.6 Million to Revitalize Coal Communities in Montana

May 2, 2023

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

### OSMRE invites public comment on  proposed changes to Ten-Day Notice process

April 25, 2023

Press Release

### Pagination

-  First page « First  
-  Previous page‹ Prev 
-   …  
-                Page            7 
-                Page            8 
-                Current page            9
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2398** 

STARSHA SEWELL , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. PRINCE GEORGE ’ S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. ( 8:12

- cv - 02522

- DKC )

Submitted : April 11, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ , and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie A. Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Starsha Sewell appeals the district court ’ s order s denying as moot her motion for recusal and denying her motion for relief from judgment and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Prince George ’s County Dep’t of Soc. Servs. , No. 8:12

- cv - 02522

- DKC (D. Md. Oct. 21 & Nov. 2, 2015)
. The motions to transfer, for telephone conference, and for default and summary judgment are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED