alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10885]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  COMMENDING IDAHO ON WINNING TO HOST THE 2009 SPECIAL OLYMPICS WORLD 
                              WINTER GAMES

  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Commerce Committee be discharged from further consideration and the 
Senate now proceed to S. Res. 196.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The clerk will report the resolution by title.
  The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

       A resolution (S. Res. 196) commending Idaho on winning the 
     bid to host the 2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games.

  There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the 
resolution.
  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, and the motions to 
reconsider be laid upon the table.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The resolution (S. Res. 196) was agreed to.
  The preamble was agreed to.
  The resolution, with its preamble, is as follows:

                              S. Res. 196

       Whereas Special Olympics is an international nonprofit 
     organization that promotes personal development through 
     sports training and competition;
       Whereas Special Olympics advances the understanding of 
     intellectual disabilities in the community and the Nation 
     through participation and fellowship;
       Whereas Special Olympics serves more than 2,500,000 
     individuals with intellectual disabilities;
       Whereas Special Olympics offers more than 200 programs in 
     over 160 countries;
       Whereas Special Olympics offers 30 Olympic-type summer and 
     winter sports to both children and adults with intellectual 
     disabilities;
       Whereas Boise, Idaho won the international bid to host the 
     2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games to be held February 
     6 through 13, 2009;
       Whereas thousands of athletes are expected to compete in 
     the 2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games; and
       Whereas the 2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games will 
     be the largest multi-sport event ever held in the State of 
     Idaho: Now, therefore, be it
       Resolved, That the Senate--
       (1) applauds the goals and principles of Special Olympics;
       (2) salutes the athletes, coaches, family members, friends, 
     and volunteers that make Special Olympics possible; and
       (3) congratulates the State of Idaho on its selection as 
     the host for the 2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H192]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         SPECIAL ORDERS GRANTED

  By unanimous consent, permission to address the House, following the 
legislative program and any special orders heretofore entered, was 
granted to:
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Chandler) to revise and 
extend their remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Mr. Reyes, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Chandler, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. DeFazio, for 5 minutes, today.
  Ms. Woolsey, for 5 minutes, today.
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Poe of Texas) to revise 
and extend their remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Mr. Burton of Indiana, for 5 minutes, today, January 14 and 15.
  Mr. Franks of Arizona, for 5 minutes, January 14 and 15.
  Mr. Hunter, for 5 minutes, January 14.
  Mr. Neugebauer, for 5 minutes, today.

                          ____________________
```
Page 1 of 1

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on January 31, 2023

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 16-1713 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

2 16-1813 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

3 16-1872 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

4 17-0023 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

5 17-0279 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

6 18-0242 Onekey, LLC 02/05/21 DFR 02/18/21 Closed

7 18-0731

UHS of Delaware, Inc. and 

Premier Behavioral Health 

Solutions of Florida, Inc. d/b/a 

Suncoast Behavioral Health 

Center

05/19/21 DFR 05/21/21 Closed

8 18-1287 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Closed

9 18-1288 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Closed

10 18-0701 Midvale Paper Box Company, 

Inc. 10/21/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

11 20-0762 CentiMark Corporation 10/27/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

12 20-0653 Eastern Gas Transmission and 

Storage, Inc. 10/28/21 DFR 11/05/21 Closed

13 19-0622 Anthony Marano Co. 02/10/22 DFR 02/16/22 Closed

14 20-0541 Harvey Builders d/b/a Harvey 

Cleary Builders 03/03/22 DFR 03/11/22 Closed

15 21-0432 Ariana Murrell-Rosario d/b/a 

Liberty Tax Service 07/01/22 DFR 07/13/22 Closed

16 20-1212 Roy Rock, LLC 07/14/22 DFR 07/15/22 Closed

17 20-0232 U.S. Ceiling Corp. 09/29/22 DFR 10/05/22 Open

18 21-0794 U.S. Postal Service – Canovanas 

Post Office 11/16/22 DFR 11/18/22 Open

19 17-0949 Walmart, Inc. 11/28/22 REM

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                OF BESTWAY, INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K
(the "Form 10-K") for the year ended July 31, 2003 of Bestway, Inc. (the
"Issuer").

I, David A. Kraemer, Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (i)   the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section
               13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
               U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Issuer.

Dated:  October 27, 2003.

                                                   /s/ David A. Kraemer
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   David A. Kraemer

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 27 day of October 2003.

/s/ Jeanne A. Andress
--------------------------------------------
Name: Jeanne A. Andress
      --------------------------------------
Title: Notary Public

My commission expires:  4/13/2006
                       ---------------------
# Official Journal L 280/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 280 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 619 November 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 280

English edition

Legislation

Volume 619 November 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2018/1625 of the European Central Bank of 8 October 2018 amending Decision ECB/2007/7 concerning the terms and conditions of TARGET2-ECB (ECB/2018/24) | 1 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2018/1626 of the European Central Bank of 3 August 2018 amending Guideline ECB/2012/27 on a Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET2) (ECB/2018/20) | 40 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2018/1625 of the European Central Bank of 8 October 2018 amending Decision ECB/2007/7 concerning the terms and conditions of TARGET2-ECB (ECB/2018/24)

1

GUIDELINES

*

Guideline (EU) 2018/1626 of the European Central Bank of 3 August 2018 amending Guideline ECB/2012/27 on a Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET2) (ECB/2018/20)

40

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10422]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  GORDON N. CHAN POST OFFICE BUILDING

  The bill (H.R. 6558) to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 1750 Lundy Avenue in San Jose, California, as 
the ``Gordon N. Chan Post Office Building,'' was considered, ordered to 
a third reading, read the third time, and passed.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 10.9


 


Certain identified information has been excluded from
this exhibit because it is both (i) not material and (ii) would likely cause competitive harm to the registrant if publicly disclosed.
[*] indicates that information has been redacted.


 


 


	 	 	18683 Bearpath Trail




Eden Prairie, MN 55347


 


Telephone (612) 202-7026


rcohen@zomedica.com


 


Robert Cohen


Chief Executive Officer


 


August 14, 2020


 


Mr. Hanjoon Ryu


General Manager


Qorvo Biotechnologies, LLC


14205 21st Avenue North (Suite 212)


Plymouth, MN 55447


 


Dear Hanjoon:


 


This letter agreement (the "Agreement") is entered
into between Qorvo Biotechnologies, LLC, having a principle place of business at 14505 21st Avenue North (Suite 212), Plymouth,
MN 55447 ("Qorvo") and Zomedica Pharmaceuticals Corp., having a principle place of business at 100 Phoenix Drive (Suite
180), Ann Arbor, MI 48108 ("Zomedica") pursuant to Section 15.8 of the Development and Supply Agreement between Qorvo
and Zomedica dated November 26, 2018 (the "Original Agreement") and is intended to amend the Original Agreement as set
forth below. The defined terms used in this Agreement are as contained in the Original Agreement.


 


WHERAS, Zomedica and Qorvo desire to change the final Milestone
Event.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, Qorvo and Zomedica, intending to be legally
bound, agree as follows:


 


1. The final Milestone Event set forth in Section 6.1 of the
Original Agreement; namely, "[*]" hereby is removed and replaced by: "[*]" For clarity, assays one through
five are as identified in SCHEDULE 1.21-1 through SCHEDULE 1.21-5 to the Original Agreement.


 


2. No other section of the Original Agreement is revised in
any way including, but not limited to, the $2,000,000 cash payment associated with the milestone revised in paragraph 1 hereinabove.


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


	Qorvo Biotechnologies, LLC	 	Zomedica Pharmaceuticals Corp.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature: 	/s/ Hanjoon Ryu	 	Signature: 	/s/ Robert Cohen
	 	 	 	 	 
	Name: 	Hanjoon Ryu	 	Name: 	Robert Cohen
	Title: 	General Manager	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 
	Date: 	August 20, 2020	 	Date: 	August 29, 2020
ENTERPRISE FUNDING CORPORATION
                      c/o MERRILL LYNCH MONEY MARKETS INC.
                      World Financial Center - South Tower
                               226 Liberty Street
                            New York, New York 10281

April 28, 1998

Ms. Leeanne Graziani
Union Acceptance Funding Corporation
9240 Bonita Beach Road
Suite 1109-C
Bonita Springs, Florida 34135

Dear Leeanne:

This letter is to confirm our agreement to amend the Transfer and Administration
Agreement between Union Acceptance  Corporation (the "Collection Agent"),  Union
Acceptance  Funding   Corporation  (the  "Transferor")  and  Enterprise  Funding
Corporation  (the  "Company")  dated  July 24,  1995 and as amended to date (the
"Agreement").  The Agreement  shall be amended as follows and shall be effective
as of today:

o        In Section 1.1, the definition of  "Termination  Date" shall be amended
         so that "July 18, 1998" contained in clause (v) of the definition shall
         read "July 18, 1999".

o        In Section 1.1,  the  definition  of  "Defaulted  Receivable"  shall be
         amended so that "60"  contained in clause (i) of the  definition  shall
         read "90".

The  Transferor  hereby  represents  and warrants that the  representations  and
warranties of the  Transferor set forth in Section 3.1 of the Agreement are true
and correct as of the date hereof (except those  representations  and warranties
set forth therein which specifically relate to an earlier date).

All other  terms and  conditions  of the  Agreement  not  amended by this letter
agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

If this letter  correctly  sets forth our  agreement,  please sign the  enclosed
duplicate original and return to Brian D. Krum,  NationsBank Investment Banking,
NationsBank Corporate Center, 10th Floor, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255 by May
2, 1998.

Sincerely,

ENTERPRISE FUNDING CORPORATION


By: /s/ Stewert Cutler
Name: Stewert Cutler
Title:


                                                        -1-

<PAGE>



Accepted and Agreed:

UNION ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION                  PERFORMANCE FUNDING CORPORATION


By: /s/ Melanie S. Otto                      By: /s/ Leeanne W. Graziani
Name:  Melanie S. Otto                       Name: Leeanne W. Graziani
Title:  Vice President                       Title: Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          58,038
<SECURITIES>                                     1,661
<RECEIVABLES>                                  828,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,294
<INVENTORY>                                    408,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,386,374
<PP&E>                                       1,582,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                 576,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,519,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,235,860
<BONDS>                                      1,741,847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (383,851)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,519,615
<SALES>                                      5,804,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,804,561
<CGS>                                        4,379,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,379,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,168,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,225
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             198,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                   104,324
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (46,718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,718)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-2938

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Benjamin J. Henderson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana

____________

 Submitted: May 7, 2018

Filed: May 20, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Benjamin J. Henderson appeals the sentence the district court imposed after 1

revoking his supervised release. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this

court affirms.

His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief discussing whether

delay in holding the revocation hearing violated Henderson’s due process rights,

whether there was sufficient proof of the violations alleged, and whether the

revocation sentence was procedurally and substantively reasonable. 

Upon review, this court rejects the contention that delay in holding the

revocation hearing violated Henderson’s due process rights. See Kartman v. Parratt,

535 F.2d 450, 455-56 (8th Cir. 1976) (rejecting due process claim based on delay in

holding parole revocation hearing where defendant did not allege prejudice). The

district court did not clearly err in determining that Henderson committed the

violations alleged. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (court may revoke supervised release

if it finds by preponderance of evidence that defendant violated condition of

supervised release); United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 913-14 (8th Cir. 2009)

(standard of review). This court concludes that the revocation sentence was neither

procedurally nor substantively unreasonable. See Miller, 557 F.3d at 915-17

(discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions; listing sources of procedural

error);see also United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying

presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines

range).

The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, United States DistrictJudge for the Western 1

District of Arkansas.

-2-
### Re: Montana Modeling Report Montana Modeling Report Vanessa Hinkle Vanessa Hinkle to: Parker, James M 03/22/2012 04:48 PM From: Vanessa Hinkle/R8/USEPA/US To: "Parker, James M" < jmparker @pplweb.com> Parker, James M Montana Modeling Report Vanessa Hinkle Hi Jim. The report will be available in the docket. Vanessa

Hi Jim. The report will be available in the docket. Vanessa "Parker, James M" 03/22/2012 04:17:48 PM Hi Vanessa - Has the Montana modeling report... From: "Parker, James M" < jmparker @pplweb.com> To: Vanessa Hinkle/R8/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 03/22/2012 04:17 PM Subject: Montana Modeling Report Hi Vanessa - Has the Montana modeling report of Mar ch 16, 2012 (referenced on page 50 of the FIP) been made available yet? Thanks Jim 

### The information contained in this message is intend ed only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of t his message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review , dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have re ceived this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
#### Schafer and others, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and another, Respondents.

*September 17*

October *12, 1926.*

*Appeal and error: Affirmance by divided court.*

Where the Justices of this court are equally divided in opinion on the question involved in an appeal, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

*187Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county: E. Ray Stevens, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment affirming the award of the *-Industrial Commission.*

There is no substantial dispute on the facts in this case except as to the deductions that should be drawn from such .facts.

The .deceased, A. F. Varney, was a carpenter employed by the appellant *Schafer & Olson,*and while in the course of his employment received injuries resulting in a broken leg. ■ The. fracture was reduced but the result was unsatisfactory, so that a couple of week's later an operation was performed and plates were ápplied to hold the broken bones in place. Some three weeks later the plates were removed under anaesthetic and a plaster cast applied. Two weeks thereafter the deceased developed symptoms of smallpox. All this time deceased was confined in bed in the hospital. He was immediately taken to his home and cared for by his wife, but death from smallpox resultéd a short time thereafter. There .was .testimony by the physician in charge that the deceased’s death was partially' induced by his' lowered vitality owing to his previous accident and the complications resulting therefrom. The *Industrial Commission*found for the claimant, *Carrie Varney,*and -the plaintiffs brought an action in the circuit court to review the award entered by the *Commission■:*The circuit court affirmed the award of the *Indtistrial Commission,*from which this appeal was taken.

For the appellants there was a brief by *Stephens, Slette-land & Sutherland,*attorneys, and *Bagley, Spohn & Ross,*of counsel, all of Madison, and oral argument by *Robert J. Sutherland*and *William H. Spohn.*

For the respondent *Industrial Commission*there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Levitan.*

*188Crownhart, J.

Mr. Justice Stevens presided at the trial of this case in the circuit court. Pie therefore did not participate in the consideration and decision of the case in this court. The members of the court participating are equally divided in opinion upon the question involved on this appeal. Mr. Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Esch-weiler, and Mr. Justice Owen are of the opinion that the judgment appealed from should be reversed. Mr. Chief Justice Vinje, Mr. Justice Doerfler, and the writer are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Under the established rule it follows that the judgment appealed from is affirmed. *Fox River Paper Co. v. Railroad Comm.*189 Wis. 626, 208 N. W. 266.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.