alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Sasnett,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 9, 2010
                        By:
                        /s/
      David W. SasnettDavid
      W. SasnettExecutive
      Vice President & Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of Akorn, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Akorn, Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 19, 2013





/s/ TIMOTHY A. DICKTimothy A. DickChief Financial Officer
ON AHPC LETTERHEAD


                                                     January 4, 2000

William J. Murray
Madison, NJ

         We are pleased to extend to you additional rights under your severance
agreement, dated February 10, 1998, (the "Severance Agreement") with American
Home Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("AHP"), which, upon the
signature of the parties below, is hereby amended as set forth below.
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
given such terms in the Severance Agreement.

         For purposes of the Severance Agreement, in the event of any sale or
other disposition of (i) greater than fifty percent (50%) of the equity
securities of American Cyanamid Company, a subsidiary of AHP ("Cyanamid"), (ii)
assets of Cyanamid having a value equal to more than 50% of the value of the
assets of Cyanamid (as determined in good faith by AHP) or (ii) all or
substantially all of the business unit in which you are employed (each of (i),
(ii) and (iii) being referred to herein as a "Cyanamid Change in Control"),
unless with your consent you continue as an employee of AHP or its subsidiaries
(other than Cyanamid or its subsidaries), a Change in Control shall be deemed to
have occurred under the Severance Agremeent and, thereafter, the term "Company"
and each and every other reference in the Severance Agreement to AHP shall mean
Cyanamid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon a Cyanamid Change of Control, (x)
AHP shall retain the obligation to cause Cyanamid or any successor thereto (in
accordance with the terms of Section 6(i) of the Severance Agreement) to assume
and perform its obligations under the Severance Agreement, and (y) in the event
that Cyanamid or any such successor fails to make payments or provide other
benefits to which you are entitled in connection with a termination of
employment following a Cyanamid Change of Control as required under the
Severance Agreement, AHP shall make such payments and provide such benefits.

         Notwithstanding the foregoing, any references in the Severance
Agreement after a Cyanamid Change of Control to benefit plans, programs and
arrangements of the "Company" shall be deemed to include those plans in which
you participate that are sponsored or maintained by AHP.

                                            AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION


                                            By /s/ Rene R. Lewin
AGREED to as of even date herewith:         Name:   Rene R. Lewin
                                            Title:   Vice President
/s/ William J. Murray
William J. Murray

AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY

By /s/ Louis L. Hoynes, Jr.
Name:  Louis L. Hoynes, Jr.
Title:  Senior Vice President and General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     7
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE
     BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          7,255,700
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            6,935,831
<EQUITIES>                                     0
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 7,255,700
<CASH>                                         2,979,299
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             22,262,250
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         240,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 43,325,360
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                31,154,606
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            2,744,699
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    7,596,872
<COMMON>                                       102,501
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   43,325,360
<PREMIUMS>                                     1,891,819
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            117,680
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (5,179)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 0
<BENEFITS>                                     1,159,025
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    956,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           69,229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (174,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (59,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (174,755)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (115,755)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.13)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 31,982,392
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            1,159,025
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             87,323
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               2,547,895
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                31,154,606
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 41063 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Mack Hinojosa,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:19

- CR

- 669

- 1

Before **King, Smith,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Mack Hinojosa appeals the 84

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon. He argues that the district court erred by denying his request

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 28, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-41063 Document: 00515545219 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/28/2020No. 19

- 41063

2 for a three

- level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under § 3E1.1(a)

– (b) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines

. We review a district court’s refusal to grant an offense

- level reduction for acceptance of responsibility “with even greater deference” than clear error review. United States v. Buchanan , 485 F.3d 2 74, 287 (5th Cir. 2007). This Court will not reverse a denial of a reduction under § 3E1.1 unless the decision is “without foundation.” United States v. Juarez

- Duarte , 513 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

. In determining whether a reduction under § 3E1.1 applies, the district court may consider the defendant’s “voluntary termination or withdrawal from criminal conduct or association s.” **U.S. Sentencing**  **Guidelines Manual** § 3E1.1 c mt

. n. 1(B) (U.S. Sentencing Comm ’n 2018) ; cf. United States v. Watkins , 911 F.2d 983, 985 (5th Cir. 1990). Here,

t he district court’s denial of a § 3E1.1 reduction was not without foundation because it was based on the district court’s finding that, after his guilty plea and while in custody, Hinojosa engage d in conduct in violation of the law and prison rules when he struck , or attempted to strike, a correctional officer. See Juarez

- Duarte , 513 F.3 d at 208, 211.

T he district court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 19-41063 Document: 00515545219 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/28/2020
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0571. DANIEL W. TAYLOR v. CARLOTTA FICKLIN et al.

Daniel W. Taylor, a prisoner with the Georgia Department of Corrections, filed

a pro se “complaint to stop garnishment” against the Department and its

superintendent. The trial court dismissed his complaint, and Taylor filed this direct

appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. 

Because Taylor isincarcerated, his appeal is controlled by the PrisonLitigation

Reform Act of 1996, OCGA § 42-12-1 et seq. Under OCGA § 42-12-8, an appeal of

a civil action filed by a prisoner “shall be as provided in Code Section 5-6-35.” And

under OCGA § 5-6-35, a party must file an application for discretionary appeal.

Because Taylor failed to do so here, this appeal must be dismissed. See Jones v.

Townsend, 267 Ga. 489 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). 

But even if Taylor were not currently incarcerated, this appeal would still be

subject to dismissal because appeals in cases involving garnishment must also be

November 02, 2017
initiated by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (4) and (b); Maloy v.

Ewing, 226 Ga. App. 490, 491 (486 SE2d 708) (1997). For these reasons, this appeal

is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/02/2017
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

 Complainant,

v.

ANGELICA TEXTILE SERVICES, INC.,

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 08-1774

DISMISSAL ORDER

This case is on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. 

Sec’y of Labor v. Angelica Textile Services, Inc., No. 18-2831 (2d Cir. July 20, 2020). The Second 

Circuit dismissed the Secretary’s appeal as moot under Article III of the United States Constitution

because (1) Respondent “filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy” while the case was pending before the 

Commission; (2) the Secretary failed to “file a proof of claim before the bar date for government 

claims” in the bankruptcy proceeding; and (3) Respondent did “not appear[] through counsel in 

this matter and is in default on appeal.” Id., slip op. at 2; U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1. The Second 

Circuit also vacated the Commission’s decision as moot and remanded with instructions to dismiss 

the case. Angelica, No. 18-2831, slip op. at 2-3. In accordance with the mandate filed on July 20, 

2020, this case is dismissed. 

SO ORDERED.

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: July 27, 2020 /s/ 

John X. Cerveny 

 Executive Secretary
##### 



Exhibit 10.11.2

February 27, 2001

Mr. John Robert Cooper
Senior Vice President
Finance & CFO
PG&E National Energy Group
7500 Old Georgetown Road, 13th Floor
Bethesda, MD 20814-6161

Dear John:

You are an essential member of our senior executive team and I view your
contribution as vital to getting the Corporation through its current
challenges, achieving the Corporations objectives, and providing strong
returns to shareholders.

The Board of Directors recently approved a Senior Executive Retention program
which includes you. Under this program, you will receive a grant of phantom
PG&E Corporation restricted stock units granted under the PG&E Corporation
Long-Term Incentive Plan. The amount of your grant is $1,250,000 and it
translates into 95,715 units calculated at the closing price of PG&E
Corporation common stock on February 21, 2001, of $13.06 per share. An
extremely small number of individuals are included in this arrangement. For
this reason, it is absolutely necessary for you to restrict any conversation on
this subject to me, Brent Stanley, or Tom Boren.

Your grant of phantom PG&E Corporation restricted stock units is effective
February 21, 2001, and will vest on December 31, 2004, subject to either one of
the following conditions:



| |  | 50 percent will automatically vest on December 31, 2004. The remaining
50 percent will vest on December 31, 2004 only if the Corporations
performance, as measured by relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) on a
cumulative basis over four years, is at or above the 55th percentile of
its comparator group; or
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
| |  | if, at the end of the third year of the grant, December 31, 2003, the
Corporations performance as measured by relative TSR on a cumulative
basis, is at or above the 75th percentile of its comparator group, the
entire grant will vest.                                                                          

You may elect to defer your actual award payments under the PG&E Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan prior to the award cliff-vesting. Such
deferrals will be made in PG&E Corporation phantom stock units





---



##### 



John Robert Cooper
February 27, 2001
Page 2

on the first
business day of January of the year following vesting. Awards not deferred
will be paid in cash in January of the year following vesting.
If a monetizing event occurs (i.e., IPO or sale) which affects NEG, you will be
given the opportunity of exchanging your grant of phantom PG&E corporation
stock units under this program for an equity-type interest of comparable value
in the new entity.

John, I look forward to your continued strong contributions to PG&E
Corporations success.

Sincerely,
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of G/O International, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the year ending March 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, Jack L. Burns, President, Treasurer and director of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
  operations of the Registrant.

Dated: 5/11/06                               /s/Brian E. Rodriguez
      -----------                            ----------------------
                                             Brian E. Rodriguez
                                             President
                                             Treasurer
                                             Director
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                               As of May 1, 1997
 
The Alpine Group, Inc.
1790 Broadway, Suite 1500
New York, New York 10019-1412
 
    Re: Services Agreement dated as of October 2, 1996 by and between The Alpine
       Group, Inc. and Superior Telecom Inc. (the "Agreement")
 
    This will confirm our agreement in modification of the captioned Agreement
as follows:
 
1.  Section 3(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the dollar
    amount of "$925,000" and replacing it with the dollar amount of
    "$2,717,000".
 
2.  Section 4(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the first
    sentence thereof and inserting the following:
 
    a.  Effective from and after May 1, 1997 in respect of the twelve month
       period immediately succeeding such date, Superior shall pay Alpine the
       fee provided for under Section 3(b) quarterly in advance effective May 1,
       1997."
 
    The amendments provided for herein have been approved by the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors of Superior Telecom Inc.
 
    As modified hereby, the Agreement is hereby expressly ratified and
confirmed.
 
    If the foregoing conforms with your understanding of the agreement reached
between us, kindly execute a copy of this letter so indicating.
 
                                Very truly yours,
 
                                SUPERIOR TELECOM INC.
 
                                BY:             /S/ STEVEN S. ELBAUM
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                                  Steven S. Elbaum
                                Its:               PRESIDENT AND
                                              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
Agreed to as of the date first
  herein above set forth
 
THE ALPINE GROUP, INC.
 
By:   /s/ BRAGI F. SCHUT
      ---------------------
      Bragi F. Schut
Its:  EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Debra G. Morehead, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Zenex
     International, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   [reserved];

     c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     d)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the
          case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls over financial reporting.

Date:   November 14, 2005

        DEBRA G. MOREHEAD
        Debra G. Morehead
        Signature

Title:  Chief Financial Officer