UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


_______________





x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010





o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the transition period from ______ to  ______.





Commission file number:   333-72163





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.




Nevada
58-2550089(State of Incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)








3500 Lenox Road, NESuite 1500Atlanta, Georgia  30326(Address of principal executive offices)(404) 419-2440(Issuer’s telephone number, including area code)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.





Yes o          No o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).


Yes  No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a larger accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)





Large accelerated filer            o
Accelerated filer oNon-accelerated filer              o
Smaller reporting company x





Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:
Yes o
No x





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


Yes o             No x


State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:


Class

Outstanding at September 30, 2010Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
192,948,792













DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.





FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010


TABLE OF CONTENTS





INDEX
PagePART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATIONITEM 1 – Financial Statements – Unaudited
3Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009
3Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
4Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
5Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
7ITEM 2- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
14ITEM 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
18ITEM 4 - Controls and Procedures
19PART II- OTHER INFORMATIONITEM 1 – Legal Proceedings
20ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
20ITEM 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities
20ITEM 4 – Removed and Reserved
20ITEM 5 – Other information
20ITEM 6 – Exhibits
20SIGNATURES
21EXHIBITS
22


Table of Contents




PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.  Financial Statements





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)As of SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 and DECEMBER 31, 2009UNAUDITED30 Sept 2010


31 Dec 2009ASSETSCURRENT ASSETS:Cash and cash equivalents


3,184



25,845Investments available for sale


140,000



0Other current assets


5,250



269,919Total current assets


148,434



295,764Long Term AssetsMineral properties


1,394,053



0Property, plant and equipment at cost


2,369,424



2,398,776Less accumulated depreciation


(1,992,070
)


(1,632,253
)Net property, plant and equipment


1,771,407



766,523OtherAssets


94,852



179,852TOTAL ASSETS


2,014,693



1,242,139LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITCURRENT LIABILITIES:Accounts payable


1,126,541



1,312,177Accounts payable-related parties


367,237



141,391Payroll liabilities


558,686



558,686Accrued liabilities


724,662



648,856Convertible loans


373,005



360,000Total current liabilities


3,150,131



3,021,110LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:Long-term Notes payable-related parties


2,901,926



2,514,926Total long-term liabilities


2,901,926



2,514,926TOTAL LIABILITIES


6,052,057



5,536,036STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITPreferred stock, $.001 par value 10,000,000 authorized, no shares issued and outstanding


0



0Common stock, $.001 par value 500,000,000 shares authorized, 192,948,792 and 115,717,375 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 respectively


192,949



115,717Additional paid-in-capital


15,786,033



12,223,375Accumulated deficit


(20,016,347
)


(16,632,989
)Total stockholders' deficit


(4,037,364
)


(4,293,897
)TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT


2,014,693



1,242,139


See notes to consolidated financial statements


Table of Contents





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2009UNAUDITED


UNAUDITED3 mos ending September 30, 2010


3 mos ending September 30, 2009


9 mos ending September 30, 2010


9 mos ending September 30, 2009RevenueSales

$
-


$
-


$
-


$
-Cost of sales


-



-



-



-Gross profit


-



-



-



-Operational ExpensesOrganizational, selling, general and administrative expenses


845,480



2,077,154



2,774,880



4,931,503Depreciation


119,939



119,939



359,817



359,817Total operating expenses


965,419



2,197,093



3,134,697



5,291,320Operating loss


(965,419
)


(2,197,093
)


(3,134,697
)


(5,291,320
)Other income (expense)Interest expense


(23,319
)


(345,798
)


(248,661
)


(1,023,227
)Income before income taxes


(988,738
)


(2,542,891
)


(3,383,358
)


(6,314,547
)Income tax provision


-



-



-



-Net income (loss) for the period


(988,738
)


(2,542,891
)


(3,383,358
)


(6,314,547
)Basic earnings (loss) per share

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.03
)

$
(0.02
)

$
(0.07
)Weighted average shares outstanding


192,948,792



96,204,042



192,948,792



96,204,042Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.03
)

$
(0.02
)

$
(0.07
)Fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding


192,948,792



96,204,042



192,948,792



96,204,042





See notes to consolidated financial statements


Table of Contents




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSFOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 2010 and 20099 mos ending September 30, 2010


9 mos ending September 30, 2009Cash provided by (used in):Operating activities:Net income

$
(3,383,358
)

$
(6,314,547
)Depreciation


359,817



359,817Noncash share issuance for services


1,277,881



5,309,783Noncash share issuance for interest






818,656Common Stock Issued to Retire DebtChanges in assets and liabilitiesAccounts payable


(185,636
)


(1,468,070
)Accounts payable-related parties


225,846



909,819Current Assets


349,669Accrued liabilities


75,806



198,214Payroll liabilities


(0
)Net cash used by operating activities


(1,279,975
)


(186,328
)Investing activities:Purchase of mining rights


-



-Net cash used by investing activities


-



-Financing activities:Proceeds from sale of Debentures


387,000



40,561Interest ExpenseConvertible Loans


13,005Common Stock Issued to Retire Debt


831,362Proceeds from sale of common stock, net


25,946



147,500Proceeds from Shareholder loans


-



-Payments on Shareholder loans


-



-Net cash provided by financing activities


1,257,313



188,061Net increase/(decrease) in cash


(22,661
)


1,733Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period


25,845



(1,063
)Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
3,184


$
670


Supplemental schedule of non-cash charges:


Noncash share issuance for services


1,174,072



3,544,282Write-off of Accounts Payable


265,366Common Stock Issued to Retire Debt


106,525Noncash share issuance for interest


225,342



554,656





See notes to consolidated financial statements


Table of Contents




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)FOR THE Three Months Ending September 30, 2010Common StockDollars at


Paid in Cap.


Accum


Stockholders'Shares


Par ($.001)


Dollars $


Deficit


EquityBalances 12/31/09


115,717,375


$
115,717


$
12,223,375


$
(16,192,994
)


(3,853,902
)-Common shares issued for cash


946,000



946



25,000







25,946-Common shares issued for services


20,555,500



20,556



1,174,072







1,194,628Common shares issued to retire debt


6,625,000



6,625



99,900







106,525Common shares issued for Acquisition


9,614,667



9,615



1,346,053







1,355,668Acquisition of investment held for sale










140,000







140,000Shares Cancelled


(3,713,920
)


(3,714
)










(3,714
)Gain (loss) for year














(2,394,620
)


(2,394,620
)Balances 6/30/2010


149,744,622



149,745



15,008,400



(18,587,614
)


(3,429,469
)





See notes to consolidated financial statements


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 1—NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES





NATURE OF OPERATIONS





Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. is a junior gold miner that acquires and develops mining properties that can that can be put into production, or have a capital creation event, within 12 to 24 months. The Company’s mission is to become a recognized gold producer within two years. A key to this plan is the acquisition of late stage exploration and development projects that can be quickly advanced to production.  Our objective is to focus on low-risk and proven reserves that will be valuable and produced returns for its shareholders.





PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION





Our Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and include our accounts and our wholly owned subsidiaries’ accounts (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.





PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2010.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.  However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  The financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and results of operations.  The operating results for the period ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period of any future year.





The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.





Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company’s system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented.





In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and related consolidated interim statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity (deficit) include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The Company follows the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and has adopted a year-end of December 31.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions of future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those reported.





CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS and FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS





Cash equivalents comprise certain highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased. As at the reporting dates, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash only. The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values.





PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT





Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is recorded on the straight-line basis over estimated useful lives that range from three to five years, but do not exceed the useful life of the individual asset. Normal maintenance and repairs are charged to operations while expenditures for major maintenance and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or sold, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss arising from such disposition is included in the consolidated statement of activities.





REVENUE RECOGNITION





We recognize the sale of product when an agreement of sale exists, product delivery has occurred, title has transferred to the customer and collection is reasonably assured. The price received is based upon terms of the contract.  There was no revenue generated in the reporting period.





MINERAL CLAIM PAYMENTS AND EXPLORATION EXPENSES





The Company expenses all costs related to the acquisition, maintenance and exploration of its unproven mineral properties to which it has secured exploration rights. If and when proven and probable reserves are determined for a property and a feasibility study prepared with respect to the property, then subsequent development costs of the property will be capitalized. To date the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of its exploration prospects, therefore all costs have been expensed. The Company also considers the provisions of EITF 04-02 “Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets” which concluded that mineral rights are tangible assets. Accordingly, the Company capitalizes certain costs related to the acquisition of mineral rights where proven or probable reserves are present, or when the Company intends to carry out an exploration program and has the funds to do so.





CONCENTRATIONS





Concentration of Credit Risk — Financial instruments, which could potentially subject the Company to credit risk, consist primarily of cash in bank and receivables. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company’s account balances, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced material losses in such accounts, and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to its cash accounts.





Concentration of Operations — The Company’s operations are all related to the minerals and mining industry. A reduction in mineral prices or other disturbances in the minerals market could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS





Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are charged to operations or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are charged to operations. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with the earlier of completion of a feasibility study or the Company’s commitments to plan of action based on the then known facts.





STOCK BASED COMPENSATION





The Company has adopted FASB ASC Topic 718 - Stock Compensation, which requires the Company to measure the compensation cost of stock options and other stock-based awards to employees and directors at fair value at the grant date and recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period for awards expected to vest. The Company ceased the Stock Option program at 31 December 2007.   The Company issued stock for payment of professional fees and this stock issuance was expensed based on the market value of the stock on the date granted.




CONVERTIBLE NOTES


The Company reviews the terms of convertible debt and equity instruments it issues to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments, including embedded conversion options that are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. In circumstances where the convertible instrument contains more than one embedded derivative instrument, including conversion options, that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single compound instrument. Also, in connection with the sale of convertible debt and equity instruments, the Company may issue free standing warrants that may, depending on their terms, be accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, rather than as equity.  When convertible debt or equity instruments contain embedded derivative instruments that are to be bifurcated and accounted for separately, the total proceeds allocated to the convertible host instruments are first allocated to the fair value of all the bifurcated derivative instruments. The remaining proceeds, if any, are then allocated to the convertible instruments themselves, usually resulting in those instruments being recorded at a discount from their face amount.


When the Company issues debt securities, which bear interest at rates that are lower than market rates, the Company recognizes a discount, which is offset against the carrying value of the debt. Such discount from the face value of the debt, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to income, using the effective interest method.





INCOME TAX





The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740 –. Under ASC 740 deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry-forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. ASC 740 also requires that uncertain tax positions are evaluated in a two-step process, whereby (1) it is determined whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority would be recognized.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS





Impairment of Long-lived Assets — Management reviews and evaluates the net carrying value of all facilities, including idle facilities, for impairment at least annually, or upon the occurrence of other events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We estimate the net realizable value of each property based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows that will be generated from operations at each property, the estimated salvage value of the surface plant and equipment, and the value associated with property interests. All assets at an operating segment are evaluated together for purposes of estimating future cash flows.





Although management has made a reasonable estimate of factors based on current conditions and information, assumptions underlying future cash flows are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Estimates of undiscounted future cash flows are dependent upon estimates of metals to be recovered from proven and probable ore reserves, and to some extent, identified resources beyond proven and probable reserves, future production and capital costs and estimated metals prices (considering current and historical prices, forward pricing curves and related factors) over the estimated remaining mine life. It is reasonably possible that changes could occur in the near term that could adversely affect our estimate of future cash flows to be generated from our operating properties. In accordance with FASB ASC 360-10-10 if undiscounted cash flows including an asset’s fair value are less than the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss is recognized.





ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES


The Company has adopted FASB ASC 815-10 that requires companies to recognize all derivatives contracts as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and to measure them at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging derivative with the recognition of (i) the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk or (ii) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is recognized in income in the period of change.  The Company has not entered into derivative contracts either to hedge existing risks or for speculative purposes. The adoption of this pronouncement does not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.


BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE


The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with FASB ASC 260. The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the “as if converted” basis. At September 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding options, warrants and stock purchase rights to purchase a total of 7,777,500 common shares of the Company that could have a future dilutive effect on the calculation of earnings per share.





ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS





The Company follows FASB ASC 410-20, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated retirement costs. The standard applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and normal use of the asset.   ASC 410-20 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. The liability is accreted at the end of each period through charges to operating expense. If the obligation is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, the Company will recognize a gain or loss on settlement. As at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the Company had no asset retirement obligations.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS





In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) (formerly issued as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB SFAS No. 162), as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP launched on July 1, 2009.  The ASC does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the ASC will be considered no authoritative. The ASC is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The ASC is for disclosure only and will not impact our financial condition or results of operations.  The Company has adopted this pronouncement effective as of September 30, 2009. The adoption of this ASC had no impact on our financial reporting process.





On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASC Subtopic 815-10 (formerly SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133), which provides revised guidance for enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and the related hedged items are accounted for under ASC Topic 815, and how derivative instruments and the related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows.  Since the Company currently does not have any derivative instruments, there are no additional disclosures required.





On January 1, 2009, the company-adopted guidance issued by the FASB on business combinations ASC 805 including that the purchase method be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This standard defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control instead of the date that the consideration is transferred. In a business combination, including business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisition), the acquirer is required to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions. It also requires the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from certain contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values. Additionally, it requires acquisition-related costs to be expensed in the period in which the costs are incurred and the services are received instead of including such costs as part of the acquisition price. The adoption has not had a material impact on the company’s financial statements.





In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 820 “Determining Fair Values When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly." This FSP provides guidance on (1) estimating the fair value of an asset or liability when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly declined and (2) identifying transactions that are not orderly. The FSP also amends certain disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 157 to require, among other things, disclosures in interim periods of the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This pronouncement is effective prospectively beginning April 1, 2009. The Company has determined that the impact that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.





In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 820 and ASC 320-10-65 "Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments". This ASC modifies the requirements for recognizing other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities and changes the existing impairment model for such securities. The ASC also requires additional disclosures for both annual and interim periods with respect to both debt and equity securities. Under the ASC, impairment of debt securities will be considered other-than-temporary if an entity (1) intends to sell the security, (2) more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovering its cost, or (3) does not expect to recover the security's entire amortized cost basis. The ASC further indicates that, depending on which of the above factor(s) causes the impairment to be considered other-than-temporary, (1) the entire shortfall of the security's fair value versus its amortized cost basis or (2) only the credit loss portion would be recognized in earnings while the remaining shortfall (if any) would be recorded in other comprehensive income. ASC 820 requires entities to initially


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





apply the provisions of the standard to previously other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities existing as of the date of initial adoption by making a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The cumulative-effect adjustment potentially reclassifies the noncredit portion of a previously other-than-temporarily impaired debt security held as of the date of initial adoption from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income. This pronouncement is effective April 1, 2009. The Company has adopted this pronouncement; and determined that there was no impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations as a result of the adoption.





In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 825, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments." This ASC essentially expands the disclosure about fair value of financial instruments that were previously required only annually to also be required for interim period reporting. In addition, the ASC requires certain additional disclosures regarding the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments.  The Company has applied this pronouncement in the current reporting period.





In May 2009, the FASB issued, "Subsequent Events ASC 855-10-05, which provides guidance to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. ASC 855-10-05 also requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated as well as the rationale for why that date was selected. ASC 855-10-05 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, and accordingly, the Company adopted this pronouncement during the second quarter of 2009. ASC 855-10-05 requires that public entities evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. The Company has looked at subsequent events through the issuance date of this statement and has concluded that there are no material subsequent events for disclosure.





In June 2009, the FASB issued, "Accounting For Transfers of Financial Assets -- An Amendment Of FASB Statement ASC860, which requires entities to provide more information regarding sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the entity has continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. ASC 860 eliminates the concept of a "qualifying special-purpose entity", changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures. ASC 860 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company has determined that ASC860 will not have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.





In June 2009, the FASB issued "Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (RASC 810-10, which modifies how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. ASC 810-10 clarifies that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity's purpose and design and a company's ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. ASC 810-10 requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 also requires additional disclosures about a company's involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. ASC 810-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company has determined that the adoption of impact ASC 810-10 did not have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.





In February 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-9 Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements("ASU 2010-9"). ASU 2010-9 amends disclosure requirements within Subtopic 855-10. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC's requirements. ASU 2010-9 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The Company determined that the adoption of ASU 2010-09 to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





In January 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-6 Improving Disclosures about Fair Measurements ("ASU 2010-6"). ASU 2010-6 provides amendments to subtopic 820-10 that require separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the presentation of separate information regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU 2010-6 provides amendments to subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures about the level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-6 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010. The Company determined that the adoption of ASU 2010-06 will not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.





In January 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-2 Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary- a Scope Clarification ("ASU 2010-2"). ASU 2010-2 addresses implementation issues related to the changes in ownership provisions in the Consolidation—Overall Subtopic (Subtopic 810-10) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, originally issued as FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. Subtopic 810-10 establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for noncontrolling interests and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary. An entity is required to deconsolidate a subsidiary when the entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Upon deconsolidation of a subsidiary, an entity recognizes a gain or loss on the transaction and measures any retained investment in the subsidiary at fair value. The gain or loss includes any gain or loss associated with the difference between the fair value of the retained investment in the subsidiary and its carrying amount at the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated. In contrast, an entity is required to account for a decrease in ownership interest of a subsidiary that does not result in a change of control of the subsidiary as an equity transaction. ASU 2010-2 is effective for the Company starting January 1, 2010. The Company determined that the adoption of ASU 2010-2 does not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position.





In December 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-17 Consolidations (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities ("ASU 2009-17"). ASU 2009-17 amends the FASB ASC for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). The amendments in ASU 2009-17 replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. ASU 2009-17 also requires additional disclosures about an enterprise's involvement in variable interest entities. ASU 2009-17 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity's first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company determined that the adoption of ASU 2009-17 does not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.





In December 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-16 Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets ("ASU 2009-16"). ASU 2009-16 amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. The amendments in ASU 2009-16 improve financial reporting by eliminating the exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. In addition, the amendments require enhanced disclosures about the risks that a transferor continues to be exposed to because of its continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. ASU 2009-16 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity's first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2009-16 to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.




In August 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-4 Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments—an Amendment to Section 480-10-S99 ("ASU 2009-4"). ASU 2009-4 represents a Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") update to Section 480-10-S99, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. The adoption of guidance within ASU 2009-4 did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value measurement and Disclosures”, an Accounting Standard Update. In September 2009, the FASB issued this Update to amendments to Subtopic 82010, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculates net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments at the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be made by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees.   The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-lB. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The amendments in this Update apply to all reporting entities that hold an investment that is required or permitted to be measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring or non recurring basis and, as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, if the investment meets certain criteria The amendments in this Update are effective for the interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009.  The adoption of this standard had no effect on the Company’s financial reporting.





NOTE 3—PROPERTIES, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT





Property Plant and Equipment consists of:





September 30, 2010


December 31, 2009Mine and Mill Equipment


2,369,424



2,296,776Mineral Properties Jungo and Basin Gulch


1,394,424



0Subtotal


3,763,848



2,398,776Less: accumulated depreciation


(1,992,070
)


(1,632,253
)Net Fixed Assets


1,771,778



766,523





The Internal Revenue Service has a federal lien on the company’s subsidiary Dutch Mining, LLC’s equipment, real property and leases in the amount of $567,062.  The State of Oregon Department of Revenue has a lien on the company’s subsidiary Dutch Mining, LLC’s personal and real property in the amount of $118,663. Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. is not liable for the taxes associated with these liens, except to the extent that it makes additional capital available to Dutch Mining, LLC.





NOTE 4—INCOME TAX





The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740 –. Under ASC 740 deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry-forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. ASC 740 also requires that uncertain tax positions are evaluated in a two-step process, whereby (1) it is determined whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority would be recognized.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Uncertain Tax Positions





On January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions.





Based on our assessment of FIN 48, we concluded that the adoption of FIN 48, as of January 1, 2007, had no significant impact on our results of operations or financial position, and required no adjustment to the opening balance sheet accounts. Our year-end analysis supports the same conclusion, and we do not have an accrual for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2009. As a result, tabular reconciliation of beginning and ending balances would not be meaningful. If interest and penalties were to be assessed, we would charge interest-to-interest expense, and penalties to other operating expense. It is not anticipated that unrecognized tax benefits would significantly increase or decrease within 12 months of the reporting date.





NOTE 5—ACQUISITION OF SUBSIDIARY





In January 4, 2007, the company entered into a definitive Share Exchange agreement (the “Agreement”) with Dutch Mining, L.L.C., an Oregon limited liability company (‘Dutch Mining’).  Pursuant to the agreement, the company agreed to acquire 100% of the outstanding equity of Dutch Mining from the stockholders of Dutch Mining (the “Dutch Mining Shareholders”) in exchange for the issuance by the company to the Dutch Mining Shareholders of an aggregate of 24,000,000 newly issued shares of common stock (“the Exchange Shares”). The Exchange shares were issued to the Dutch Mining Shareholders on a pro rata basis, in proportion to the ratio that the percentage of Dutch Mining Interest held by such.  Dutch Mining Shareholder bears to the number of shares of Dutch Mining Interests held by all the Dutch Mining Shareholders as of the contract closing date.





The transactions was accounted for as a recapitalization, with the shares issued as consideration being recorded at $3,936,480 that being value given up after considering price fluctuations and liquidity issues.





NOTE 6—CAPITAL STOCK





Common Stock





As of September 30, 2010, the Company had 192,948,792 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding and as of December 31, 2009, the Company has 115,717,375 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.





Warrants





The fair value of the warrants is measured at the end of the reporting period with changes in fair value recognized in net income. None were recognized in the period ending June 30, 2010. The value determined for these warrants was $1,544,946.  Using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the market price and volatility of the Company’s shares of common stock as quoted on the OTCBB as of June 30 2010, the value of these warrants is determined to be zero.  The warrants do not confer upon the holders any rights or interest as a shareholder of the Company.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





As at September 30, 2010 the following share purchase warrants were outstanding:




Warrants Outstanding

Exercise Price
Expiration Date500,000
$
1.15
January 5, 2013250,000

1.15
January 5, 201341,667

0.60
February 27, 2010100,000

0.97
February 27, 201012,500

0.95
April 14, 201312,500

0.95
April 14, 2013833,333

1.00
September 4, 2010166,667

1.00
September 4, 20103,333,333

0.50
March 12, 201162,500

0.50
June 9, 2012437,500

0.50
June 9, 2012125,000

0.30
October 5, 201250,000

0.30
October 21, 201262,500

0.30
November 16, 2012500,000

0.30
November 18, 2012100,000

0.30
November 18, 201275,000

0.30
November 24, 201275,000

0.30
November 29, 2012125,000

0.30
December 4, 2012625,000

0.30
December 9, 201490,000

0.30
December 9, 2012100,000

0.30
December 16, 201250,000

0.30
December 16, 201250,000

0.50
December 16, 20127,777,500




NOTE 7—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS





The Company assumed a note issued by Dutch Mining, LLC in the amount of $1,214,916 to Embassy International, LLC, and Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board, Ewald Dienhart. This is a demand note with $900,000 secured by the mill equipment at an interest rate of 6% and the balance unsecured with a 0% interest rate.  The parties have agreed not to demand the loans through December 31, 2012 therefore the loans are recorded as long-term liabilities





The Company assumed notes issued by Dutch Mining, LLC in the amount of $250K to Gabriela Dienhart-Engel, who is the daughter of the former Chairman of the Board, Ewald Dienhart. The note is dated July 31, 2006 and carries an interest rate of 6.0%.  The note is partially secured by the title to the Gold Bug Mine, and may be converted into shares of the Company.  The related parties have agreed not to demand the loans through December 31, 2012 therefore the loans are recorded as long-term liabilities





The Company assumed notes issued by Dutch Mining, LLC in the amount of $100,000 to CD TBE, LLC, a Company related to the former Chairman of the Board, Ewald Dienhart. The note is dated July 31, 2006 and carries an interest rate of 6.0%.  The note is partially secured by the Gold Bug mine and certain equipment used by the Company, and may be converted into shares of the Company.  The related parties have agreed not to demand the loans through December 31, 2012 therefore the loans are recorded as long-term liabilities.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





The Company assumed a note issued by Dutch Mining LLC in the amount of $950,000 to Josef Bauer for working capital.  The note is guaranteed by Ewald Dienhart and carries an interest rate of 8.0%.  The related parties have agreed not to demand the loans through December 31, 2012 therefore the loans are recorded as long-term liabilities.





The Company leases space from Rendata Industrial Park, LLC. Rendata Industrial Park ownership: The Ebert Family Trust owns 52% and the remaining 48% is owned by the Caruso Dienhart (TBE) Family LLC.  For the period ended December 31, 2009 the Company accrued rent and related expenses in the amount of $142,380 and had a payable balance accrued of $311, 775 at September 30, 2010.





The Company had an agreement with HPUs, LLC, whose Managing Member Patrick Engel, is related to the Company’s former Chairman, effective November 30, 2007 to provide management services. The contract was for one year, automatically renewable unless terminated for a monthly amount of $9,500.





NOTE 8 – MINERAL PROPERTIES AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS





With the acquisition of the Basin Gulch Project and the Jungo Project, we also acquired certain mining claims and permits in the transaction. Since that time, we have not commenced any mining operations therefore, we have not recorded any amortization expense and we have determined that no impairment has occurred for the period ended September 30, 2010. Components of our mineral properties and development costs are as follows:








September 30, 2010Basin Gulch claims

$
1,300,424Jungo


94,000$
1,394,424








NOTE 9—FINANCIAL CONDITION AND GOING CONCERN





The Company's continuance is dependent on raising capital and generating revenues sufficient to sustain operations. The Company believes that the necessary capital will be raised and has entered into discussions to do so with certain individuals and companies. However, as of the date of these consolidated financial statements, no formal agreement exists.





The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to secure the necessary capital and continue as a going concern.





NOTE 10—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES





The Company leases office space in Atlanta Georgia under a one-year renewable contact presently at approximately $1,500 monthly. The rates escalate over the term.





There was a lease agreement entered into between the Company and Rendata Industrial Park, LLC on the 31st of March, 2002 for certain rental property consisting of 32,900 square feet of covered space located within Rendata Industrial Park in Josephine County, Oregon. The lease is for a monthly amount of $11,075, for a ten-year period. The lease has an option for two ten-year lease extensions under the same terms and conditions.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 11 – ACQUISITION OF AULTRA GOLD





On December 31, 2009, pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, Rauno Perttu, Strategic Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Aultra Gold Capital Inc., a Turks and Caicos corporation, the Company acquired controlling interest of Aultra Gold for a purchase price of One Million newly-issued shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share.


Acquisition of Aultra Gold, Inc.’s Assets


On January 6, 2010, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Aultra Gold, Inc. effective as of December 31, 2009.  Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company acquired all of Aultra Gold’s assets. As consideration for these assets, the Company issued 9,614,667 shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to Aultra Gold.


In accordance with the transaction, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets related to Aultra Gold’s gold and mineral business, including inventory, accounts receivable, certain supply and distribution and other vendor contracts, good will and other various assets and intangibles. The parties made customary representations, warranties and indemnities that are typical and consistent for a transaction of this size and scope.


In January 2010, the Company announced that an independent consulting geologist conducted an NI 43-101 compliant report, indicating the mineral resource at the Basin Gulch property was sizeable. That report is available as a Form 8K at www.sec.gov and on the Company website, www.dutchgold.com


On March 29, 2010, the Company’s subsidiary, Aultra Gold, Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange (the “Agreement”) with Shamika Gold Inc., a Canadian Corporation (“Shamika”), and certain shareholders of Shamika (the “Shamika Holders”).  Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares (the “Shamika Shares”) from the Shamika Holders in exchange for an aggregate of 25,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Common Stock”) (the “Exchange”).  As a result of the Exchange, Shamika became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.  The Company shares were issued to the Shamika Holders on a pro rata basis, on the basis of the shares held by such Shamika Holders at the time of the Exchange.


The former holders of the Shamika Shares now beneficially own approximately 51% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. Accordingly, the Exchange represents a change in control. Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. retained 4,950,000 shares of Shamika Gold, Inc. These shares are carried at the lower of cost or market value whichever is less for financial reporting purposes.  Market value at September 30, 2010 was $1,237, 500.  For financial accounting purposes, the acquisition was a reverse acquisition of the Company by Shamika, under the purchase method of accounting, and was treated as a recapitalization with Shamika as the acquirer. Upon consummation of the Exchange, the Company adopted the business plan of Shamika and the Company owns 9.9% of the Shamika business.





NOTE 12 – MINING LEASE AND OPTION TO PURCHASE





GOLD BUG MINE





In 1995, the Company purchased the mining property known as Mineral Lot no. 351 final certificate No. 83 consisting of the Gold Bug, Silver State, Silver Dollar, Oregonian, Bimetallist and US Lode Claims in Josephine County, Oregon.  These claims are collectively referred to as the Gold Bug, which had gold production until 1942, when mining ceased as a result of World War II.  Historic production and current geochemical studies indicate the presence of minerals associated with gold formations.  The Company intends to permit the Gold Bug Mine after completing a thorough and diligent study to assess the economic potential of the properties.  There are no current plans to advance the Gold Bug project.


Table of Contents


DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





BASIN GULCH





Dutch Gold Resources, Inc., was granted an assignment of the Basin Gulch Mine lease between Aultra Gold, Inc. and Strategic Minerals, Inc. as a result of the acquisition of this asset and the majority of the stock in Aultra Gold, Inc.  On May 31, 2006, the Company entered into a Mining Lease Agreement with Strategic, whereby Strategic granted the Company the exclusive right to explore, evaluate, develop, and mine the Basin Gulch Property, Montana. The advanced exploration and test mining project consists of eleven patented mineral claims, surrounded by the Deer Lodge National Forest, totaling about 217.9 acres. The claims are all located at the head of Basin Gulch, on the northern slopes of the West Fork Buttes, within the Sapphire Range of the Western Montana Rocky Mountains.





The three-stage Mining Lease Agreement for Basin Gulch is structured as follows:




Stage 1 initial payment:




The Company paid its initial cash payment of $10,000 and prior to July 30, 2006 satisfied its reporting obligations to Strategic regarding all the exploration and studies conducted on the premises of Basin Gulch Property.




Stage 2 advance production royalties:




To further evaluate and develop the minerals, the Company fulfilled the following obligations:




i) By June 10, 2006, it paid a cash payment of $15,000 directly to the underlying property owner;




ii) by September 10, 2006 made a cash payment of $25,000 directly to the underlying property owner, and at the end of each flowing six month period to date..  Since 2008, Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. made such payments under an agreement with AGI, which granted a security interest in all the claims to the Company, in the event that AGI could not repay such advances;




iii) a cash payment of $25,000 will be made on September 10, 2010, and thereafter on every six months until production has commenced.





Stage 3 production royalties:




Upon commencement of production, the Company must pay the greater of:




i) A twice annual cash payment of $50,000 due on March 10 and September 10 of each year; or




ii) 3% of the gross sales receipts of the gold and silver sold, due semi-annually on March 10 and September 10 of each year;




Should production be suspended for a period of 6 months or longer, the twice annual advance production royalty of $50,000 listed above resume. Upon the completion of payments totaling $8,000,000, the Company will have purchased the mineral rights to this property.





JUNGO





On June 1, 2007, the Company entered into a formal binding Agreement of Purchase and Sale (the "Agreement") with W.R. Hansen, an individual (the “Seller”), pursuant to which the Company acquired from the Seller certain mining claims together with all improvements and all equipment owned by the Seller located thereon, located in Humboldt County, State of Nevada (the “Property”). In consideration of the purchase of the Property, the Company agreed to: (i) reimburse the Seller for all staking and filing costs related to the Property, (ii) issue to the Seller 50,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), valued at $0.50 per share, (iii) upon its sole determination of sufficient mineralization to place the Property in production, to further issue to the Seller additional 50,000 restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock, such that the Company shall make such a determination not later than 30 days following the acquisition of the data contemplated by paragraph 3.3 of the Agreement, (iv) not later than 10 days following the date the Property is placed into development for production of metals, to issue to the Seller an additional 100,000 restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock, and (v) as further consideration after the Property is placed in production, to direct to the Seller a monthly Net Smelter Royalty of 2% upon all gold, silver, copper, or other metals (the “Metals”) produced and sold from the Property (each royalty payment shall be paid not later than 30 days following the last day of the month in which the metals were produced and sold). Closing of the sale and purchase of the Property occurred on the same date, as under the Agreement both the Company and the Seller have performed their mutual obligations under paragraph 2.2 and Section 4 thereof.





Table of Contents


Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Resultsof Operations and Financial Condition





Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.   These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions.  We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions.  Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain.  Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to:





•
unexpected changes in business and economic conditions;


•
significant increases or decreases in gold prices;


•
unanticipated grade changes;


•
metallurgy, processing, access, availability of materials, equipment, supplies and water;


•
determination of reserves;


•
results of current and future exploration activities;


•
results of pending and future feasibility studies;


•
joint venture relationships;


•
local and community impacts and issues;


•
timing of receipt of government approvals;


•
accidents and labor disputes;


•
environmental costs and risks;


•
competitive factors, including competition for property acquisitions;


•
availability of external financing at reasonable rates or at all; and


•
the factors discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under the heading “Risk Factors.”





This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under the sections titled “Risk Factors and Uncertainties”, “Description of the Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” of this Quarterly Report.  Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated or expected.  We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.  We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except as required by law.





Stockholders and other users of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are urged to carefully consider these factors in connection with the forward-looking statements. We do not intend to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.








Overview and Results of Operations





Overview





Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. is a junior gold miner focused on developing its existing mining properties in North America and acquiring and developing new mines that can enter into production in 12 to 24 months. The Company’s mission is to become a recognized gold producer in the near future. A key to this plan is the acquisition of late stage exploration and development projects that can be quickly advanced to production.  Our objective is to focus on low-risk and proven reserves that will be economical and profitable for its shareholders.


Table of Contents


Basin Gulch, Montana


The Basin Gulch Mine is a large, open-ended, gold and silver system in Montana located in central Montana west of Helena near the Idaho border.  This area has produced some of the most prolific strikes, including the famous Last Chance Gulch mine, and Barrick’s Golden Sunlight Mine.





An updated NI 43-101 complete report was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in January 2010.  The report showed a significant increase in mineralization, using data not previously reported.  A copy of the report is available at www.SEC.gov or on the Company website, www.dutchgold.com.  The consulting geologist did not complete reserve estimates for the other areas where drilling occurred.  These areas also encountered strong mineralization but the drilling was on close enough centers to use for reserve estimation.  It is important to understand that none of the historic drilling or trenching was designed to look for higher grade selectively mineable or underground mineable resources, although several strong exploration targets were identified.  This means that Dutch’s current primary exploration targets at Basin Gulch have been identified but are not yet included in the above reserve figures. Dutch believes resources discovered in these exploration targets would be minable under Montana mining law. The potential size of the exploration targets is theoretically several million ounces.





The mine was discovered by Rauno Perttu and been partly explored by 323 reverse circulation and core drill holes, totaling approximately 90,000 feet.  The Company has also completed 17,000 feet of trenches.  Most of the holes were shallow largely pattern-drilled for an open-pit reserve.  The system contains multiple areas of mineralization, and an open-ended defined resource of more than two million ounces of mostly low-grade disseminated gold and silver, with local shallow higher-grade breccias and inferred veins. The system covers a known area in excess of 2,600 acres, and appears to be related to other mineralized areas in the local area. Approximately $3.6 million was spent on this exploration, which was focused on identifying a large open-pit minable reserve.





The most exciting target on the property is a nested diatreme complex (overlapping volcanic breccia pipes) that extends over a minimal area of 2,600 feet by 3,300 feet. This diatreme complex has not been drilled to depth, and may contain high-grade gold and silver mineralization in a deeper “boiling zone”. The diatreme complex is characterized by overall low-grade gold and silver mineralization and local high-grade mineralization. Nearby shallow much smaller diatreme zones appear to be adjacent outliers to the main diatreme complex. These outliers are associated with an inferred controlling fault zone that may also be an important control for the main diatreme and for some of the inferred veins. Two of these smaller diatremes appear to contain near-surface “boiling zones”, and contain high-grade gold and silver mineralization.





The Company is evaluating consultants to facilitate the process of testing, drilling and developing the Basin Gulch property.  Subject to funding, the Company expects to file for a preliminary permit for the above-mentioned activities prior to December 31, 2010.  We expect to begin testing and drilling during the fourth quarter of 2010.





Jungo




Jungo is located in northern Nevada near the Oregon border.




The Jungo property lies between the historic Sleeper and Hycroft mines in Humboldt County, Nevada. Rauno Perttu, Dutch Gold’s COO and renowned Geologist discovered the Jungo exploration property in 2006.




The Hycroft Mine historically produced in excess of a million ounces of gold and recently announced that it plans to go back into production with the recent discovery of at least 5 million ounces of additional reserves.




The Sleeper Mine produced approximately 1.7 million ounces of gold, much of it from very high-grade near-surface veins. Recent exploration is finding new areas of strong ore-grade mineralization below the historic mine pit and along newly identified mineral structures outside the historic exploration area.




Activity among major mining companies continues to grow in the immediate area, In addition to the Sleeper and Hycroft mines, Jungo is adjacent to the Sandman mine, currently being developed by Frontier Gold and their joint venture partner, Newmont.




The Company announced results of a trenching investment in the quarter ending June 30, 2010.  Based on these results, the Company plans to begin a drilling program during the fourth quarter of 2010.


Table of Contents


Mill




The Company owns a mill at Grants Pass, Oregon, which has capacity to produce 330 tons/day and a 120 tons/day circuit in storage.  The Company is seeking partners to process ore.  Alternatively, the Company may redeploy the mill to another project.





Gold Bug Mine




The Company owns the Gold Bug mine at Silver State, Silver Dollar, Oregonian, Bimetallist and US Lode Claims in Joseph County, Oregon.  Gold Bug had gold production until 1942, when mining ceased as a result of World War II.  Historic production and current geochemical studies indicate the presence of minerals associated with gold formations.  The Company intends to permit the Gold Bug Mine after completing a thorough and diligent study to assess the economic potential of the properties.





Employee relations




As of September 30, 2010, we had 5 employees.





Reclamation




We generally are required to mitigate long-term environmental impacts by stabilizing, contouring, re-sloping and re-vegetating various portions of a site after mining and mineral processing operations are completed. These reclamation efforts are conducted in accordance with detailed plans, which must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate regulatory agencies.  The Company has recently completed a reclamation plan at the Benton Mine and has concluded all operations on the property.





Government Regulation





Mining operations and exploration activities are subject to various national, state, provincial and local laws and regulations in the United States, which govern prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection of the environment, mine safety, hazardous substances and other matters. We have obtained or have pending applications for those licenses, permits or other authorizations currently required for our exploration and other programs. We believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with applicable mining, health, safety and environmental statutes and the regulations passed thereunder in the United States. There are no current orders or directions relating to us with respect to the foregoing laws and regulations. For a more detailed discussion of the various government laws and regulations applicable to our operations and potential negative affects of these laws and regulations please see "Item 1A.—Risk Factors" below.





Environmental Regulation





Our gold projects are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing protection of the environment. These laws are continually changing and, in general, are becoming more restrictive. Our policy is to conduct business in a way that safeguards public health and the environment. We believe that our operations are conducted in material compliance with applicable laws and regulations.





Changes to current local, state or federal laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where we operate could require additional capital expenditures and increased operating and/or reclamation costs. Although we are unable to predict what additional legislation, if any, might be proposed or enacted, additional regulatory requirements could impact the economics of our projects.





During 2009, there were no material environmental incidents or material non-compliance with any applicable environmental regulations. We estimate that we will not incur material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities during the current fiscal year.


Table of Contents


Results of Operations





Three Months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009





During the three-month period ended September 30, 2010 the Company incurred operating expenses of $965,419 and interest expenses of $23,319 as compared to operating expenses of $2,197,093 and interest expenses of $345,798 for the period ended September 30, 2009.  The Company's net loss during the three-month period ended September 30, 2010 was $988,738 as compared to a net loss of $2,542,891 during the three-month period ended September 30, 2009.





Twelve-Month Business Outlook





In order to act upon our operating plan discussed herein, we must be able to raise sufficient funds from (i) debt financing; or, (ii) new investments from private investors.





Operating Expenses and Capital Expenditures





Operating Expenses





Assuming that the Company is successful raising funds, we anticipate incurring operating expenses of approximately $2,000,000 during the next twelve months to fund the costs relating to the development of our properties and the identification of new acquisitions.




Source of Revenue





When produced, the Company sells gold concentrates and Dore to brokers and/or refineries. The Company has not produced any revenue since 2008.





Liquidity and Capital Resources





We currently have limited sources of capital, including the public and private placement of equity securities and the possibility of debt. With limited liquid assets and depreciating fixed assets the availability of funds from traditional sources of debt will be limited, and we cannot assure you that there will be a source of funds in the future.





As of September 30, 2010, we had a cash balance of $3,184. We estimate that, based upon our current business, we will require up to $4,000,000 over the next two years.  However, the Company cannot properly anticipate the capital expenditures and working capital needed in connection with its operations and development.  As part of the Shamika transaction, Dutch Gold holds 4,950,000 shares of Shamika Resources (ticker:  AGDI), which as of November 11, 2010 had a share price of $0.25 for a total market value of Dutch Gold's holdings of $1,237,500.





Our independent certified public accountants stated in their report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 that we have incurred operating losses from our inception and that we are dependent upon our ability to meet our future financing requirements and the success of future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.





ITEM 3 –  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURESABOUT MARKET RISK





The Company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company also has not entered into financial instruments to manage and reduce the impact of changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, although we may enter into such transactions in the future.


Table of Contents


ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES





(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures





Based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the SEC and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Disclosure controls and procedures are defined as those controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  As reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s chief executive and financial officer has determined that there are material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures.  It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.”





The material weaknesses in our disclosure control procedures are as follows:





1.           Lack of formal policies and procedures necessary to adequately review significant accounting transactions. The Company utilizes a third party independent contractor for the preparation of its financial statements. Although the financial statements and footnotes are reviewed by our management, we do not have a formal policy to review significant accounting transactions and the accounting treatment of such transactions. The third party independent contractor is not involved in the day to day operations of the Company and may not be provided information from management on a timely basis to allow for adequate reporting/consideration of certain transactions.





2.          Audit Committee and Financial Expert. The Company does not have a formal audit committee with a financial expert, and thus the Company lacks the board oversight role within the financial reporting process.





We intend to initiate measures to remediate the identified material weaknesses including, but not necessarily limited to, the following:





Establishing a formal review process of significant accounting transactions that includes participation of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Company’s corporate legal counsel.





Form an Audit Committee that will establish policies and procedures that will provide the Board of Directors a formal review process that will among other things, assure that management controls and procedures are in place and being maintained consistently.





(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting





As reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, management is aware that there a significant deficiency and a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and therefore has concluded that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2009. The significant deficiency relates to a lack of segregation of duties due to the small number of employees involvement with general administrative and financial matters.  The material weakness relates to a lack of formal policies and procedures necessary to adequately review significant accounting transactions.  There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


Table of Contents


PART II — OTHER INFORMATION





Item 1.    Legal Proceedings





We may be involved from time to time in ordinary litigation, negotiation and settlement matters that will not have a material effect on our operations or finances.  We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us or our officers and directors in their capacity as such that could have a material impact on our operations or finances.





On April 8, 2010, the Company was advised that the Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an investigation titled “In the Matter of Dutch Gold Resources, Inc.,” File No. A-03222.  In the investigation, the Company and its Chief Executive Officer, Daniel W. Hollis, received subpoenas to produce documents to and provide investigative testimony before the staff of the Commission.  Neither the Company nor Mr. Hollis have been notified of the specific nature of the investigation.


We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.





Item 1A.   Risk Factors





Not required for smaller reporting companies.





Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.


During the quarter ending September 30, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 12,050,433 shares of Common Stock in consideration for services to non-related parties.  Also during the period ending September 30, 2010, the Company sold an aggregate of 31,153,704 shares of common stock in consideration for an aggregate purchase $133,500.





The sales of the securities identified above were made pursuant to privately negotiated transactions that did not involve a public offering of securities and, accordingly, we believe that these transactions were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 of Regulation D and Regulation S promulgated thereunder. The agreements executed in connection with this sale contain representations to support the Registrant’s reasonable belief that the investor had access to information concerning the Registrant’s operations and financial condition, the investor acquired the securities for their own account and not with a view to the distribution thereof in the absence of an effective registration statement or an applicable exemption from registration, and that the investors are sophisticated within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and are “accredited investors” (as defined by Rule 501 under the Securities Act). In addition, the issuances did not involve any public offering; the Registrant made no solicitation in connection with the sale other than communications with the investor; the Registrant obtained representations from the investor regarding their investment intent, experience and sophistication; and the investor either received or had access to adequate information about the Registrant in order to make an informed investment decision.  All of the foregoing securities are deemed restricted securities for purposes of the Securities Act.




Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities




None.





Item 4.    (Removed and Reserved)





Item 5.    Other Information




Table of Contents




Item 6.    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K








Exhibits.





Exhibit

Description of Exhibit31.1

Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.1

Board and Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Reports on Form 8-K. During the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company filed the following Current Reports on Form 8-K:





None.





SIGNATURES








In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.By:
/s/Daniel W. HollisDaniel W. Hollis, Chief Executive OfficerBy:
/s/Steve KeaveneySteve Keaveney, Chief Financial Officer





Date:  Friday, November 12, 2010