alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Launch
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Launch</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Aug. 23, 2023</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>We are aware of the DPRK’s launch using ballistic missile technology, which despite its failure, is a brazen violation of multiple unanimous UN Security Council resolutions, raises tensions, and risks destabilizing the security situation in the region and beyond. This launch involved technologies that are directly related to the DPRK intercontinental ballistic missile program. We are assessing the situation in close coordination with our allies and partners. We have assessed that this event did not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel, territory, or that of our allies, but will continue to monitor the situation. The U.S. commitment to homeland defense and the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan, remains ironclad.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

In accordance with 41 CFR 102-3.65(a), notice is hereby given that the charter for the National Toxicology Program Board of Scientific Counselors was renewed for an additional two-year period on November 14, 2024.

It is determined that the National Toxicology Program Board of Scientific Counselors, is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the National Institutes of Health by law, and that these duties can best be performed through the advice and counsel of this group.

                    Inquiries may be directed to Claire Harris, Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Mail code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or                     *harriscl@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: November 14, 2024.

Patricia B. Hansberger,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-26930 Filed 11-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2017023EN.01000701.xml

| 24.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/7

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 23/07)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Luxembourg

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 50th anniversary of the voluntariness of the Luxembourg army

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows on the right hand the effigy of His Royal Highness, the Grand-Duke Henri, looking to the right and on the left hand the text ‘50 Joer Fräiwëllegen-Arméi’ composed as logo. At the top of the design is depicted the year-date ‘2017’, flanked by the mintmark and the initials of the Mintmaster. At the bottom appears the name of the issuing country ‘LËTZEBUERG’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
  :

Estimated number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : January 2017

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
OSTI.GOV
All News Articles *(filtered)*
*DOE/OSTI Participation in the 2023 Year of Open Science*

# DOE/OSTI Participation in the 2023 Year of Open Science

Filter for News

                                            - Share on Facebook
                                            - Share on Twitter
                                            - Send a Link via E-mail
                                            - Print
                                            - More share options ... -  LinkedIn
-  Pinterest
-  Tumblr

## Figure 283120: Year of Open Science Book Image

A book lays open, it's pages fluttering at the bottom of the image. Above, scientific symbols are arranged inside hexagons: a caduceus, an atom, a mortarboard set on books, a wind turbine, a microscope, a brain, a rocket, and a budding plant.

In January 2023, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) launched the *Year of Open Science*, featuring actions across the federal government to advance national open science policy, provide access to the results of the nation's taxpayer-supported research, accelerate discovery and innovation, promote public trust, and drive more equitable outcomes.

The Department of Energy, represented by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), has joined other federal agencies to promote and contribute to the Year of Open Science. Throughout 2023, federal agencies are collaborating to inspire open science engagement through events and activities that will advance adoption of open, equitable, and secure science.

DOE OSTI, in conjunction with its role as the host of the Science.gov site, also hosts and maintains the Year of Open Science website - Open.Science.Gov. Participating agencies, including DOE, provide routine updates on their Open Science initiatives and activities. DOE's contributions have featured PIDs@OSTI.GOV (DOE's persistent identifier services), the Public Reusable Research (PuRe) Data Resources, and DOE CODE (the DOE software services platform and search tool).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       45524 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               264157 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  60003 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            398153 
<PP&E>                                      165609 
<DEPRECIATION>                               51197 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              512565 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       413883 
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   7512828 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                (7814782)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                512565 
<SALES>                                     139610 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            139610 
<CGS>                                        92338 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                92338 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            586436 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (166901)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (166901)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (166901)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 5 (Sunday, January 11, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S272]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

  The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the 
first and second times by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

           By Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. Specter):
       S. 200. A bill to authorize a cost of living adjustment for 
     the Federal judiciary; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1026 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1026

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To revise the authorized route of the North Country National Scenic 
Trail in northeastern Minnesota and to extend the trail into Vermont to 
   connect with the Appalachian National Scenic Trail, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North Country National Scenic Trail 
Route Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. ROUTE ADJUSTMENT.

    Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(8)) is amended in the first sentence--
            (1) by striking ``thirty-two hundred miles, extending from 
        eastern New York State'' and inserting ``4,600 miles, extending 
        from the Appalachian Trail in Vermont''; and
            (2) by striking ``Proposed North Country Trail'' and all 
        that follows through ``June 1975.'' and inserting ```North 
        Country National Scenic Trail, Authorized Route', dated 
        February 2014, and numbered 649/116870.''.

SEC. 3. LAND ACQUISITION.

    Neither the Secretary of Agriculture nor the Secretary of the 
Interior may acquire for the North Country National Scenic Trail land 
in Minnesota or Vermont that was obtained through condemnation by a 
State or local government.

SEC. 4. ENERGY.

    Nothing in the amendments made by this Act that change the 
authorized route of the North Country National Scenic Trail in 
Minnesota or Vermont shall prohibit the development, production, 
conveyance, or transmission of energy in those States, with reasonable 
efforts made to preserve the nature and purpose of the North Country 
National Scenic Trail, and to mitigate any damage to that trail and its 
associated resources caused by such activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1026

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To revise the authorized route of the North Country National Scenic 
Trail in northeastern Minnesota and to extend the trail into Vermont to 
   connect with the Appalachian National Scenic Trail, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
#### Harvey, Appellant, vs. Harvey and others, Respondents. [Five actions.]

*May 3*

June *4, 1929.*

For the appellants there was a brief by *Corrigan & Wright*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Walter D. Corrigan, Sr.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Hoyt, Bender, McIntyre & Hoyt,*attorneys, and *Joseph A. Barly,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Barly.*

Crownhart, J.

There was an action commenced in the circuit court for Milwaukee county, and on a pending motion in said action the parties defendant here, who resided in Ohio, had come to Milwaukee to attend court on such motion, prepared to testify as witnesses, if required. They *213came on request of a party to such action, for that purpose. They were served with summonses while so in attendance. On motion, the circuit court in which the summonses were entitled set aside the service on the ground of exemption of the parties from service while so in attendance.

It is a well settled rule of public policy that witnesses or parties from a foreign state shall not be subject to service of process upon them while in attendance on a court in another state subjecting them to liability in such state. See note in 25 L. R. A. 721, where many authorities are collated.

The appellants contend that this rule is limited in this state to such witnesses and parties as are *necessarily*in attendance, citing *Rix v. Sprague C. M. Co.*157 Wis. 572, 147 N. W. 1001. We do not think the court intended any such limitation in that case, but stated the rule as applied to the facts there presented. The court there gave the reason of the rule, as follows:

> “The exemption is primarily for the protection of the due administration of justice; so that suitors and witnesses can freely attend court without the penalty of thereby incurring any liability which would otherwise not have been incurred. The fact that it may also benefit the suitor or witness is a mere incident of its main purpose.”

In the case of a witness going to a foreign state to testify, he frequently would have no interest in the case but would go voluntarily in the interest of justice. Witnesses are to be encouraged to so attend court without fear of subjecting themselves to process while so in attendance in such foreign state. Such witnesses should not be required to determine at their peril whether or not their attendance is actually necessary. It is enough that the witness acts in good faith in attending upon the court for the purpose of giving testimony as required.

*By the Court.*— The orders of the circuit court are affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spanish Broadcasting
System, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Raul Alarcon, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/  Raul Alarcon, Jr.
-----------------------------
Raul Alarcon, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 20

- 00052

- CV

IN RE Destiny Renee MORENO

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 27, 2020, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, which included a request

to stay a hearing set for January 29, 2020. After considering the petition and the record, this court

concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a). Relator’s request for a stay is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016

- EM5

- 03434, styled In the Interest of E.S., a Child , pending in the 57th

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez presiding.
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State ofConnecticut and

Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order No. 8123A

Modification No.2

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Algonquin Gas

Transmission, LLC ("Respondent") having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 8123A and all previous modifications thereto, do now, by mutual

agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

1. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ("Regulations") are

hereby replaced with May I, 20 Io.

2. Any references to October 1

51 with respect to the date by which the Respondent shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits ("DERCs") and/or

allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 31,2007 and May 31,2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31,

2010.

4. All references to September 1,2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009.

5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 8123A and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent

shall comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-174-22(d)(I) and 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8123A, as

modified, shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street • Hartford. CT 06106-5127

www.ct.gov/dcp

An Equal 0p[Jortllllity Employer
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC 2 Trading Agreement and Order No. 8123A

Modification No.2

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC

Siwrn

Name:

rure

!hO"l4J

~~fl· code1 Jr.

Title: VI"I< pr«t'cL.1 1l!o,4[;;/- t/pel2<f;p;'J

(

Date: <;/;O/o? (,

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

Gar~----"=-d-----=---f--co:l_-l!.-

Director

Engineering & Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management
#### Dawson, Respondent, vs. Bauch and others, Appellants.

*March 13*

April *3, 1912.*

*Mortgages: Statutory form: Foreclosure Toy advertisement: Statute construed.*

*1. No power of*sale is *imported into the statutory form of*mortgage by sec. 2209, Stats. (1898), and that statute authorizes the foreclosure of such mortgages only in the manner that other mortgages which do not contain a power of sale are foreclosed.

2. A statutory form of mortgage cannot be foreclosed by advertisement, such foreclosure being restricted by sec. 3523, Stats. (1898), to mortgages containing a power of sale.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Bayfield county: Jo-iiN R. Pabish, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The cause was submitted for the appellants on the brief of *W. 8. Gate,*attorney, and *G. A. Lamoreux,*of counsel, and for the respondent on that of *Sanborn, Lamoreux & Pray.*

BaeNes, J.

It is conceded that this judgment must be affirmed if a statutory form of mortgage cannot be foreclosed by advertisement. Sec. 3823, Stats. (1898), authorizes such method of foreclosure only as to mortgages containing a power of sale. The statutory form of mortgage contains no power of sale, unless such a power is imported into it by sec. 2209, Stats. (1898), which provides that such a mortgage “shall have the effect of a conveyance of the land therein described, together with all the rights, privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging in pledge to the mortgagee, . . . for the payment of the indebtedness therein set forth, with covenant from the mortgagor that all taxes and assessments levied and assessed upon the land described, during the continuance of the mortgage, shall be paid previous to the day appointed by law for the sale of lands for taxes as fully as the forms of mortgage now and heretofore in common use in this state,' and may be foreclosed in the same manner and with the same *145effect upon any default being made in any of tbe conditions thereof as to payment of either principal, interest or taxes.”

This statute does not import into the form of mortgage therein provided for all the covenants, powers, and conditions found in forms of mortgage that were in existence when the statute was passed. It provides for two things: (1) that' the mortgage shall convey the property therein described as a pledge for the payment of the debt thereby secured,- and (2) by virtue of the statute such mortgage shall in effect contain a covenant against taxes. No power of salé is carried into the mortgage by the statute. The provision that a statutory form of mortgage may be foreclosed as other mortgages are does not help the appellants. It means that such a mortgage may be foreclosed in the same manner that other mortgages are which do not contain a power of sale. It follows that the judgment of the circuit court is correct and must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.