alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 8 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 8

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
            provide for balanced budgets for the Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

  Mr. Fitzpatrick submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
            provide for balanced budgets for the Government.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed 
total receipts for that fiscal year, unless two-thirds of the whole 
number of each House of Congress shall provide by law for a specific 
excess of outlays over receipts by a rollcall vote.
    ``Section 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President shall 
transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the United States 
Government for that fiscal year in which total outlays do not exceed 
total receipts.
    ``Section 3. The Congress may waive the provisions of this article 
for any fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in effect by a 
rollcall vote.
    ``Section 4. The Congress may waive the provisions of this article 
for any fiscal year in which a declaration of national emergency is in 
effect, as so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of 
the whole number of each House, which becomes law.
    ``Section 5. The Congress may waive the provisions of this article 
for any fiscal year in which a declaration of a natural disaster is in 
effect, as so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of 
the whole number of each House, which becomes law.
    ``Section 6. The Congress shall enforce and implement this article 
by appropriate legislation, which may rely on estimates of outlays and 
receipts.
    ``Section 7. This article shall take effect beginning with the 
fifth fiscal year beginning after its ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
OSTI.GOV
All News Articles *(filtered)*
*DOE OSTI Launches PIDs@OSTI.GOV*

# DOE OSTI Launches PIDs@OSTI.GOV

Filter for News

                                            - Share on Facebook
                                            - Share on Twitter
                                            - Send a Link via E-mail
                                            - Print
                                            - More share options ... -  LinkedIn
-  Pinterest
-  Tumblr

The Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information (DOE OSTI) offers services and support for assigning and using persistent identifiers (PIDs) for research components such as data, software, text documents, awards, people, and organizations.  PIDs deliver value to the broader research community by enabling greater discovery and reuse of research outputs through unique identification and providing appropriate credit through citation and identifying contributors.  PIDs also increase interoperability through resolvable links and robust metadata and facilitate impact and evaluation through linked research components.  With the recent launch of PIDs@OSTI.GOV, federal agencies and researchers can find general information about PIDs, details about the PID services OSTI provides, and community resources.

OSTI provides PID assignment services for research outputs.  Both the DOE Data ID Service and the Interagency DOI (IAD) Service assign DOIs to data objects produced by DOE and other federal researchers.  DOIs for software can be obtained through DOE CODE, and DOIs for text documents are assigned through E-Link, OSTI's research output submission system.  OSTI provides the Award DOI Service as a way for DOE funding offices, national laboratories, and user facilities to assign DOIs to awards, grants, and contracts.  OSTI also leads the US Government ORCID Consortium, a mechanism for DOE and other federal agency organizations to become ORCID members and utilize their infrastructure.  All of these services are detailed at PIDs@OSTI.GOV.

For people and organizations already using OSTI PID services, registration for a PIDs@OSTI.GOV account will provide users additional resources once logged in.  The available resources when logged in will depend on the OSTI PID services the user utilizes.  An account is not needed to access the publicly available information found on PIDs@OSTI.GOV.  Users should only register for an account if they use one of OSTI's PID services or are part of one of OSTI's PID communities.

For more information, please email pids@osti.gov.
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for October 2021

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 16

2. Cases Added to Docket 3 

Midvale Paper Box Company, Inc.

No. 18-0701

Directed for Review on October 21, 2021

CentiMark Corporation

20-0762

Directed for Review on October 27, 2021

Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.

20-0653

Directed for Review on October 28, 2021

 

3. Cases Subtracted from Docket 0 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-K OF ALCAN ALUMINIUM LIMITED FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             608
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,241
<PP&E>                                          11,715
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,424
<BONDS>                                          1,241
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        203
<COMMON>                                         1,251
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,466
<SALES>                                          7,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,865
<CGS>                                            5,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   436
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    763
<INCOME-TAX>                                       258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                468
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     17
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       485
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.09
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re Tamara Ford, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11-21-00030-CV * March 11, 2021

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

This court has considered Tamara Ford’s petition for writ of mandamus and 

concludes that the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1005 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

provision of adult day health care services for veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1005 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE 

2 SERVICES FOR VETERANS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1745 of title 38, United 

4 States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(d)(1) The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 

8 under section 1720(c)(1) of this title or a contract with 

9 each State home for payment by the Secretary for adult 

10 day health care provided to a veteran who is eligible for, 

11 but does not receive, nursing home care pursuant to sub12 section (a). 

13 ‘‘(2) Payment under each agreement or contract be14 tween the Secretary and a State home under paragraph 

15 (1) for each veteran who receives care under such para16 graph shall be made at a rate that is equal to 65 percent 

17 of the payment that the Secretary would pay to the State 

18 home pursuant to subsection (a)(2) if the veteran received 

19 nursing home care under subsection (a) rather than under 

20 paragraph (1) of this subsection. 

21 ‘‘(3) Payment by the Secretary under paragraph (1) 

22 to a State home for adult day health care provided to a 

23 veteran described in that paragraph constitutes payment 

24 in full to the State home for such care furnished to that 

25 veteran.’’; and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1005 RFS 

1 (2) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘, adult day 

2 health care,’’ after ‘‘home care’’. 

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

4 at the beginning of chapter 17 of such title is amended 

5 by striking the item relating to section 1745 and inserting 

6 the following new item: 

‘‘1745. Nursing home care, adult day health care, and medications for veterans 

with service-connected disabilities.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheets and unaudited condensed statements of
income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year 
to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,887,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                  783,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,733,319
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,873,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          690,310
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        16,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,734,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,873,465
<SALES>                                         46,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,822
<CGS>                                           32,829 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               673,225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (659,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 93,032
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (566,200)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 

</TABLE>
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

 

: 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : 

: 

 Complainant, : 

: 

v. : OSHRC Docket No. 21-0267 

 : 

JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, : 

 : 

 Respondent. : 

___________________________________________ : 

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief the issues presented in Respondent’s petition for discretionary 

review, except for those issues that Respondent raised in section VIII of its petition. See Commission 

Rule 92(c), 29 C.F.R. § 2200.92(c) (“The Commission will ordinarily not review issues that the Judge 

did not have the opportunity to pass upon.”). 

The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider either the merits or 

characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. Accordingly, 

the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1

 The first brief is to be filed 

within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission in 

accordance with Commission Rule 93. The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed in lieu 

of briefs) shall commence on the date of service.

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: October 25, 2023 /s/ 

 John X. Cerveny 

 Executive Secretary

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with references 

to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand margin of the table 

to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The Commission also requests that 

copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, law journal articles, and legal 

treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties should be cautioned that 

these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case therefore is ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 3/26/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
SANTIAGO FRANCO, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. 95-2201 ) (D.C. No. CIV-95-868-HB) CITY OF LOVINGTON, LEA COUNTY, ) (D. N.M.) FORREST BOSTICK, Director, Lea County ) Detention Facility; BILL P. LANE, Sheriff, ) Lea County, ) ) Defendants-Appellees. )

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges. **

Plaintiff Santiago Franco brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action alleging Defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment Due Process rights by denying him medical treatment. The district court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 andaffirm. In his complaint, Plaintiff maintained that Defendants violated his Due Process

rights by denying him medical treatment on numerous occasions between January and October 1994. The district court dismissed the portion of Plaintiff’s claim dealing with alleged medical treatment deprivations between January and August 1994 on res judicata grounds. The court noted that Plaintiff did not raise a Due Process claim in a prior negligence action he filed against Defendants, although that suit was predicated on the same factual allegations of medical deprivations between January and August 1994. See
Franco v. Lane , No. 95-2039, 57 F.3d 1080 (Table), 1995 WL 355228, at *1 (10th Cir. June 14, 1995). The court dismissed the portion of Plaintiff’s claim dealing with alleged medical deprivations between September and October 1994 on the grounds that Plaintiff had not demonstrated “‘deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.’” See id. (affirming district court’s dismissal of Plaintiff Franco’s complaint because Plaintiff failed to allege Defendants acted with deliberate indifference); Ramos v. Lamm , 639 F.2d 559, 575 (10th Cir. 1980) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976)), cert. denied , 450 U.S. 1041 (1981). We have examined the entire record on appeal and affirm for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court’s order.
AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court,
Bobby R. Baldock United States Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,009
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          69,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         63,412<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,012)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,191
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,437
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (250)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Net of bond discount of $1.351 million.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
NO. ___________________

JOSE ISMAEL ARREOLA § IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

v. § STATE OF TEXAS

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § AUSTIN, TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

NOW COMES, the Appellant, JOSE ISMAEL ARREOLA, and moves for an extension of

time to file the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review in this case, and in support thereof

would show the following:

I.

a. This case is pending below in the 195 District Court of Dallas County, Texas under TH

Cause No. F12-00581-N, styled State of Texas v. Jose Ismael Arreola. It is also

pending in the Dallas Court of Appeals under case number 05-13-00181-CR.

b. Appellant was convicted of Aggravated Assault/Serious Bodily Injury/Deadly

Weapon/Family Violence and sentenced to 28 years in prison and a fine of $5,000.00. 

The judgment date was February 6, 2013. On December 5, 2014, the Court of

Appeals affirmed the conviction. Appellant is currently in prison. 

c. The deadline for filing the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review was January

4, 2015.

d. Appellant requests an extension until February 5, 2015, to file the Petition for

Discretionary Review.

e. The reason for this request is that during the last few weeks counsel has been

working on the following:

1. Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus in Ex parte Dinesh Kumar Shah, No.

1040406, in the 182nd District Court of Harris County, Texas.

Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review - Page 1

PD-1666-14

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 12/22/2014 11:53:05 AM

Accepted 12/29/2014 1:14:57 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2. Brief in United States v. Eseos Igiebor, No. 14-10581, in the United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

3. Sentencing hearing in United States v. Raheem Abdul Shabazz, No. 3:13-CR026, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of

Mississippi.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully prays that this Motion 

be granted.

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Gary A. Udashen 

GARY A. UDASHEN

Texas State Bar No. 20369590

SORRELS, UDASHEN & ANTON

2311 Cedar Springs Road

Suite 250

Dallas, Texas 75201

214-468-8100

214-468-8104 fax

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion for 

Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief was electronically delivered to the Dallas County

District Attorney’s Office, 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., L.B. 19, Dallas, Texas 75207, to

michael.casillas@dallascounty.org, and electronically delivered to the State Prosecuting Attorney,

P. O. Box 12405, Austin, Texas 78711, to information@spa.texas.gov, on this the 22nd day of

December, 2014.

 /s/ Gary A. Udashen 

GARY A. UDASHEN

Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review - Page 2