alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OSMRE NEPA HANDBOOK 1 JULY 2019

APPENDIX 4.1 EVALUATION OF A PROPOSED ACTION TEMPLATE

Evaluation of a Proposed Action for NEPA Compliance

To: [Chief, HQ Division of Regulatory Support or Reclamation Support]

Through: FOR an anticipated EIS level of analysis: 

[Name and signature of SES Member Responsible for the Proposed Action]

FOR an anticipated CE or EA level of analysis:

[Name and signature of Field Office Director Responsible for the Proposed 

Action, if different from the Project Manager]

[NOTE: A signature is required for all levels of analysis]

From: [Project Manager]

Date:

Proposed Action:

This section should contain a brief description of the proposed action.

Level of NEPA Analysis: 

Indicate whether the proposed action will comply with NEPA by exemption, CE, NEPA 

Adequacy Review Form (NARF), Tiering, Adoption, EA, or EIS. Including a statement 

regarding whether:

• A major federal action exists;

• The action has a significant impact on the environment;

• The action is exempt from NEPA analysis; 

• The action can be addressed with a CE or NEPA Adequacy Review Form 

(NARF); and 

• Why an EA or EIS is required.

Concerns or Discussion Remaining: 

Name (NEPA Project Lead (if different from Project Manager) and Project Solicitor, when 

applicable)

Signatures
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 15
- 00144
- CR

Christopher Arthur Kurtz, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2014
- 343, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PR ESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D T O A P P E L L A N T
PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolou s and without merit. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and
file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate
record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record wit h this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted . We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written
verification to this Court of the date and manner in whi ch the appellate record was provided, on or before June 25, 2015

. See id. at 321.It is ordered on June 15, 2015.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field
Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Purusant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer ofAlcan Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, thatthe Company's report on Form 10-K/A amending the annual report on Form 10-K forthe fiscal period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

||
||
||
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

Soon Sau Lan, President for Soligor International, Inc.,
formerly known as AIC International, Inc. ("Soligor"),
and Wong May Bo, Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of of Soligor, do each certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to the best of their knowledge:

1.		Soligor's annual report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.		the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Soligor.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their
hands hereto as of the 23rd day of January, 2007.

/s PS Lan
Poon Sau Lan
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s WM Bo
Wong May Bo
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Exhibit 21
                                        Subsidiaries

      All subsidiaries are wholly owned except as indicated.

      Alliance Gaming Corporation

         Alliance Holding Company
             Bally Gaming International, Inc.
                 Bally Gaming, Inc.
                 Bally Gaming de Puerto Rico, Inc.
                 BGI Australia Pty. Limited
                 Bally Gaming Africa Pty. Limited
                 Bally Gaming and Systems, S.A.
             Alliance Automaten GmbH & Co. KG (99%)
         APT Games, Inc.
             Plantation Investments, Inc.
             United Coin Machine Co.
         Bally Gaming Missouri, Inc.
         Casino Electronics, Inc.
         Entertainment Systems Technology, Inc.
         Foreign Gaming Ventures, Inc.
             Alpine Willow Investments, Inc.
             Kansas Alliance Corporation
             Kansas Gaming Ventures, Inc.
                 Kansas Financial Partners, LLC (50%)
                 Kansas Gaming Partners, LLC (50%)
             Louisiana Ventures, Inc.
                 Southern Video Services, Inc. (49%)
                 Video Distributing Services, Inc. (49%)
                 Video Services, Inc. (49%)

             United Gaming Rainbow
                 Rainbow Casino-Vicksburg Partnership, L.P. (a)
             United Native American, Inc.
                 Native American Investment, Inc.
         Alliance Automaten Verwaltungs GmbH
             Alliance Automaten GmbH & Co. KG (1%)
                 Bally Wulff Automaten GmbH
                 Bally Wulff Vertriebs GmbH
                     Bally Gaming International GmbH
                     Bally Wulff Beteiligungs GmbH
                     Bally Wulff Billiards, GmbH
                     Bally Wulff Security, GmbH
                     Erkens Vertriebs GmbH
                     Geda Automaten GmbH Grosshandel
                     Kupper GmbH
                     Westav Automaten GmbH

     (a) There is a limited minority  interest holder.  For further  information
         see Item 1 "Business - Casino Operations".
# Official Journal L 54/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 54 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6525 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 54

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6525 February 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2022/333 of 25 February 2022 on the partial suspension of the application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on the facilitation of the issuance of visas to the citizens of the European Union and the Russian Federation | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2022/333 of 25 February 2022 on the partial suspension of the application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on the facilitation of the issuance of visas to the citizens of the European Union and the Russian Federation

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27175]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 457 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-379, K2025-377.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27175 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
#### In the Matter of Ruth N. Masaazi, Appellant, v New York City Board of Education Public School No. 133 et al., Respondents.

[772 NYS2d 555]

In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e, Ruth Nsubuga Masaazi, *492an infant, by her mother and natural guardian Jane Nsubuga Masaazi, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated September 30, 2002, which denied the application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In determining whether to grant an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the court should consider (1) whether the public corporation acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days from its accrual or a reasonable time thereafter, (2) whether the claimant demonstrated a reasonable excuse for the delay in filing a notice of claim, and (3) whether the delay would substantially prejudice the public corporation in maintaining its defense on the merits *(see*General Municipal Law § 50-e; *Rabanar v City of Yonkers,*290 AD2d 428 [2002]; *Matter of Resto v City of New York,*240 AD2d 499 [1997]). In addition, the “infancy of the injured [appellant], standing alone, [does] not compel the granting of an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim” *(Matter of Knightner v City of New York,*269 AD2d 397 [2000]). If the reason for failure to timely serve the notice of claim is infancy, then it is incumbent upon the claimant to demonstrate a nexus between the delay and the infancy. In this case, the appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the lengthy delay, or that there was a nexus between the infancy of the appellant and the delay *(see Knightner v City of New York, supra).*Furthermore, the appellant failed to demonstrate that the public corporation either had notice of the essential facts in this matter or would not suffer substantial prejudice if it were required to maintain a defense on the merits *(see Rabanar v City of Yonkers, supra).*Therefore, leave to serve a late notice of claim was properly denied. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


C.E.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending May 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.
 
 /s/ Michael A. Richardson
 Michael A. Richardson
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 American Consumers, Inc.
 
 
 Date:  August 28, 2009
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-23-00401-CV

__________________

JULIA ANN POFF, Appellant

V.

WILLIAM POFF AND GINA SMITH, Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 253rd District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 23DC-CV-00947

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relying on Rule 91a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the trial court 

dismissed claims for “alienation of affection, criminal conversation and enticement 

of spouse[]” brought by Appellant, Julia Ann Poff, against Appellees, William Poff 

and Gina Smith. Appellant sought to appeal four orders: (1) an order denying a 

motion to quash a hearing and temporarily stay proceedings; (2) an order granting 

special exceptions; (3) an order granting a protective order from discovery; and (4) 

the order dismissing in part the lawsuit filed by Appellant. The Clerk of the Court 
2

notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless 

the Court received a written reply identifying the particular statute or rule 

authorizing an appeal at this time. Appellant responded to the Clerk’s notice, arguing 

that a dismissal is an appealable order and that her main claim against Appellees is 

intentional infliction of emotional distress.

This Court generally has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments 

and interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. HarCon Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). As Appellant concedes, her live 

pleading includes claims against both Appellees for intentional infliction of 

emotional distress. The trial court’s Rule 91a order does not dispose of all her claims 

for intentional infliction of emotional distress. None of the orders in the clerk’s 

record state that the orders are final and appealable, nor do the orders contain 

language that disposes of all claims and parties. See id. at 205. 

We conclude we lack jurisdiction over the attempted appeal. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

PER CURIAM

Submitted on April 3, 2024

Opinion Delivered April 4, 2024

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentleman:



In connection with the quarterly report of Featherlite, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Conrad D. Clement, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|November 12, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Conrad D. Clement  
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
American Financial Corporation 10-K for December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in ite entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         404,831
<SECURITIES>                                10,513,038<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  609,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,999,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        517,919
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    162,760
<COMMON>                                         9,625
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,104,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,999,163
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,113,848
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               400,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                337,982
<INCOME-TAX>                                    89,658
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            248,324
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (26,328)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   221,996
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Includes an investment in investees of $200 million.
<F2>Not applicable since all common shares are owned by American 
Financial Group.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 18.0

May 7, 1999



Board of Directors
AMCON Distributing Company
10228 "L" Street
Omaha, NE  68127

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form
10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have been provided a copy of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 1999.  Note 3 therein describes a change in
accounting principle from the FIFO method to the LIFO method for costing
inventories.  It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable
method of accounting over another for costing inventories has not been
addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our
concurrence below we have relied on management's determination that this
change in accounting principle is preferable.  Based on our reading of
management's stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting
principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as to their
judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change,
we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company's
circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity
with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to September 30, 1998.  Accordingly, our comments
are subject to change upon completion of an audit of the financial statements
covering the period of the accounting change.

Very truly yours,



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
----

----

| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period      ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                     |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |

| Date:  August 8,      2008 | /s/ Thomas B.      Specketer       |   |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      | Thomas      B. Specketer           |   |
|                                      | Vice      President and Controller |   |
|                                      | (principal      financial officer) |   |

----

----