alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E9]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  STOP THE CONGRESSIONAL PAY RAISE ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. HARRY E. MITCHELL

                               of arizona

                    in the house of representatives

                        Tuesday, January 6, 2009

  Mr. MITCHELL. Madam Speaker, earlier today my colleague Dr. Ron Paul 
and I were joined by more than 50 Members of Congress from both sides 
of the aisle to introduce the Stop the Congressional Pay Raise Act of 
2009.
  As you may recall, I introduced similar bills the last two years, 
seeking to prevent an automatic pay raise for Members of Congress from 
taking effect in 2008 and 2009. Unfortunately, despite the support of 
34 cosponsors, last year's bill failed to reach the floor. As a result, 
every Member is now receiving $174,000 this year, a $4,700 increase 
since last year.
  Madam Speaker, our economy is in a recession, hundreds of thousands 
of U.S. troops are fighting overseas, and our national debt exceeds $10 
trillion. Unemployment figures are on the rise, home values are 
falling, and markets around the world are suffering from a devastating 
loss of credit and consumer demand. The American people aren't getting 
a $4,700 pay raise this year. I do not know how in good conscience we, 
as their Representatives in Congress, can accept one.
  In the last year, jobless rates increased in 49 States and the 
District of Columbia. Unemployment was up 2 percentage point from a 
year before. In my home State of Arizona, unemployment rose by over 50 
percent, leaving nearly 200,000 workers unemployed.
  Compounding the situation, economists estimate that nearly $7 
trillion of investor stock wealth was lost in 2008, and Standard & 
Poor's 500 and the Dow Jones industrial average experienced their worst 
years since the Great Depression.
  When Members of Congress accept this pay raise, we send the wrong 
message. We should be tightening our belts along with the men and women 
we represent. Americans are suffering and instead of feeling that pain, 
Congress is quietly approving pay raises to further insulate us from 
it. If you want to know why people hate Washington and feel that it is 
out of touch, it is precisely because of moves like this.
  If we are going to talk the talk of fiscal discipline, I believe we 
need to walk the walk of self-restraint. I will be donating my 2009 pay 
raise to charity, just as I did with my 2008 pay raise. I encourage my 
colleagues to do the same, and join me in stopping the next automatic 
pay raise from taking effect by supporting the Stop the Congressional 
Pay Raise Act.

                          ____________________
```
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 67 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 

relating to savings arrangements established by qualified 

State political subdivisions for non-governmental employees. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 
2 

•HJ 67 EH 

1 Department of Labor relating to ‘‘Savings Arrangements 

2 Established by Qualified State Political Subdivisions for 

3 Non-Governmental Employees’’ (published at 81 Fed. 

4 Reg. 92639 (December 20, 2016)), and such rule shall 

5 have no force or effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 67 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department 

non-governmental employees. lished by qualified State political subdivisions for of Labor relating to savings arrangements estab-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 14, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 614 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-259, K2025-257.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26374 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 10.21   
 
 Narrative Summary of American Consumers, Inc.
 Named Executive Officer Cash Bonus Plan for Fiscal 2011
 
 The following is a description of the Cash Bonus Plan applicable to the fiscal year ending in May 2011 for the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”), the only currently serving executive officer of the Company who qualifies as a “named executive officer” pursuant to Item 402(m)(2) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K.  The Board of Directors of the Company, acting upon the recommendations of management and the Board’s Compensation Committee, has elected to leave this potential bonus percentage unchanged from the potential bonus percentage established for such officer for the Company’s 2010 fiscal year.
 
 During fiscal 2011, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer will be eligible to receive a discretionary cash bonus equal to the fixed percentage of the Company’s net income before taxes for such year set forth below for such officer:
 
 
 Name:
Title:
Potential Bonus as a

Percentage of Pre-Tax Income:Paul R. Cook
Chairman of the Board, President

and Chief Executive Officer, and

Chief Financial Officer
5%
 
 The potential bonus percentage for the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Michael A. Richardson, was set at 6% at the time of his death on November 20, 2009.  The amount of any bonus ultimately paid will be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee.  In the usual case, if the Company is profitable bonuses will be paid at the targeted levels.  As reported in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Mr. Cook did not receive any bonus compensation with respect the Company’s performance in fiscal 2010, due to the Company having realized a net loss for the year.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         231,384                 231,384
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,942                 147,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                      27,798,644              27,798,644
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,616,731)             (5,616,731)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,575,525              23,575,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                     18,690,048              18,690,048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,659                   1,659
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,862,258               3,862,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,575,525              23,575,525
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,169,488               2,551,627
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,171,395               2,190,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             309,603                 666,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (310,612)               (302,507)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (310,612)               (302,507)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)                   (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)                   (.20)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      16,420,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,649,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,965,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            75,934,869
<PP&E>                                      41,819,700
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,259,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,500,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       50,817,960
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       460,822
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,433,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,500,639
<SALES>                                    134,483,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           134,483,750
<CGS>                                      108,775,629
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              125,664,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,846,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,525,942
<INCOME-TAX>                                   961,154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,564,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,564,788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.85



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.45





 






     


     


    

 









     


     


    

 





 






     


     


    

 





 






     


     


    

 





 






     


     


    

 





 






     


     


    

 





 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed
this Amendment as of the year and date above first written.


 


	LANDLORD:	 
	 	 
	900 NORTH MICHIGAN, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Barry Graham	 
	Name: 	Barry Graham	 
	Title:	VP	 
	 	 
	TENANT:	 
	 	 
	GROSVENOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP.,

an Illinois limited partnership	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Burke Montgomery	 
	Name:  	Burke Montgomery	 
	Title:	General Counsel	 


 


SIGNATURE PAGE TO EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO OFFICE
LEASE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,014,068
<SECURITIES>                                    35,270
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,613,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                   116,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,515,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,540,114
<PP&E>                                       5,063,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,647,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,200,111
<BONDS>                                      2,612,579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,608,730
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,822,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,647,533
<SALES>                                      1,930,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,204,980
<CGS>                                       61,457,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               65,748,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             215,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (696,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (189,427)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (507,019)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
United States of America
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor
Washington, DC 20036-3457


SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.
OSHRC Docket No. 18-0068
ROY ROCK, LLC, 

Respondent.


BRIEFING NOTICE
The parties are requested to brief the following issues:
(1) Did the Secretary establish that the work being performed at the time of the alleged violation was “maintenance or repair activity,” such that the cited provision, 29 C.F.R. § 1926.702(j)(1) (Lockout/Tagout procedures), applies?
(2) If so, did the judge err in concluding that the Secretary established the remaining elements of a violation?  See Safeway Store No. 914, 16 BNA OSHC 1504, 1508 (No. 91-0373, 1993) (to establish a violation, the Secretary must show that “(1) the standard applies to the cited conditions, (2) the employer’s conduct does not conform to the requirements of the standard, (3) employees are exposed to the cited conditions, and (4) the employer knew or could have known of those conditions”).  
The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider either the merits or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review.  Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.
All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.[1]  The first brief is to be filed within 40 days of this notice.  A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission 

in accordance with Commission Rule 93.  The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service.


						BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION



Dated:	August 28, 2020			/s/					
						John X. Cerveny
						Executive Secretary

---------------------------
[1]
 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies.  The Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party.  Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




October 27, 2010




Peter J. McNierney

Gleacher & Company, Inc.



Dear Peter:




     As you know, Gleacher & Company, Inc. (the “Company”) is implementing changes to its
senior management team as part of its succession plan. As a result, effective October 27, 2010,
you will be the interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in addition to the President and
Chief Operating Officer.



     In connection with these changes and subject to the achievement of the pre-established Company
performance goal approved by the Executive Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the
Company’s Board of Directors on March 11, 2010 in connection with the establishment of the annual
incentive award opportunities under the Company’s 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan (the
“Plan”) intended to constitute “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 162(m)”) for the
2010 performance year measured through December 31, 2010, as certified by the Committee consistent
with the requirements of Section 162(m), you will receive a cash award of $1.875 million pursuant
to the Plan (the “Annual Bonus”), to be paid (less applicable tax withholding) at such time
as annual cash bonuses are paid to other executive officers of the Company (on or about February
15, 2011 and in no event later than March 15, 2011); provided, however, that the amount of such
Annual Bonus will not exceed (i) the applicable percentage of the Company’s net revenues for 2010
as approved by the Committee, or (ii) the applicable limitations set forth in Section 5.2 of the
Plan.



     This letter will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of
New York, without reference to its conflict of law rules. Any controversy or dispute regarding the
interpretation, construction or enforcement of this letter agreement shall be subject to and
resolved by binding arbitration in New York, New York, in accordance with the applicable rules then
in effect of the American Arbitration Association. This letter shall be binding upon any successor
of the Company or its businesses (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or
otherwise), in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be obligated under
this letter if no succession had taken place.



[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]







 









 








     Please sign this letter and return it to the Company’s General Counsel, Patricia
Arciero-Craig.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Gleacher & Company, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	/s/ Robert A. Gerard	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	 
Robert A. Gerard
	 	 
	 

	 	Title:	 	Director, Chair of the Executive
Compensation Committee of the Board	 	 






Accepted and agreed as of

October 27, 2010:




	 	 	 

	/s/ Peter J. McNierney
 

Peter J. McNierney
## Construction Standards' Applicability to Architects and Engineers Considered by Review Commission
## PORT OF OAKLAND

June 10, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch, Director Mr. RobertFinamore, Chief Office ofInternational Aviation U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 

### Docket: DOT-OST-2013-0204 DEBORAH ALE FLINT Director ofAviation Telephone: (510) 627-1133

Fax: (510) 835-0178

ANSWER OF THE PORT OF OAKLAND IN SUPPORT OF NORWEGIAN AIR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED FOR EXEMPTION UNDER 49 U.S.C. § 40109 AND A FOREIGN AIR CARRIER PERMIT PURSUANT TO 49 U.S.C. § 41301 (U.S.- EU OPEN SKIES) On behalfofthe Port ofOakland and the Oakland International Airport ("OAK"), I appreciate the opportunity to submit this Answer in continued support ofthe Norwegian Air International Limited ("Norwegian") application for an air carrier permit. Norwegian's current operations between OAK and Norway and Sweden, respectively, have consistently delivered strong economic,job creation and travel benefits to the residents ofthe San Francisco BayArearegion. I understand that Norwegian has indicated in correspondence to you that they are making a voluntary commitment ofto utilize U.S. and European-based crew on their transatlantic flights, andbelieve that speaks favorably to its current application. As outlined in our previous correspondence, the SanFrancisco Bay Area is the third-largest U.S. origin and destination market. OAK is the most centrally located airport inthe region, being the closest airportto nearly 50 percent ofthe BayAreapopulation according to the 2010 US Census. The international flight operations conducted by Norwegian at OAK have been extremely successful and we look forward to continued opportunities to grow the European air service market for the benefitoftheresidents ofthe Bay Area. In addition to the expanded travel benefits accorded bythese flights, Norwegian's operations are also delivering tremendous positive economic andjob creation impacts through an expansion of ground-handling, cargo, maintenance, and provisioning services required for their operations. Norwegian remains a valued partner of OAK and the San Francisco Bay Area, and we

530Water Street • Jack London Square • P.O. Box 2064 • Oakland,California 94604-2064 Telephone: (510) 627-1100 • Facsimile: (510) 627-1826 • Web Page: www.portofoakland.com

### = respectfully request that their application for authority to operate as they have proposed be granted atthis time. Respectfully,

Deborah Ale 

### Flint Director ofAviation