alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 101 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2017 

Mr. ARRINGTON (for himself and Mr. KHANNA) submitted the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the number of terms an individual may 

serve as a Member of Congress. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 

2 

•HJ 101 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person who has been a Senator for 

3 2 full terms shall again be eligible for election or appoint4 ment to the Senate. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has been a Representa6 tive for 6 full terms shall again be eligible for election to 

7 the House of Representatives. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 3. For purposes of this article, any term 

9 that began before the date of the ratification of this article 

10 shall not be included in determining the number of terms 

11 that a person has been a Senator or Representative.’’. 

Æ
#### In the Matter of Laurence Farrell, Petitioner, v Raymond Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

[773 NYS2d 290]

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated August 9, 2002, dismissing petitioner from his position as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Saralee Evans, J.], entered January 30, 2003) dismissed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner refrained from taking police action against a brothel because he intended to patronize it *249is supported by substantial evidence, namely, the hearsay statements of two prostitutes who worked at the brothel picking petitioner out of a photo array as one of the police officers who used the brothel *(see Matter of McDonald v Safir,*254 AD2d 234 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 819 [1999]). The determination that petitioner falsely stated at his departmental interview that he was never inside a second brothel is also supported by substantial evidence, namely, a surveillance tape showing him there and an explanation for such presence that respondent rationally rejected as incredible *(see id.).*The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness *(see id.; Matter of Malave v Safir,*270 AD2d 72 [2000]). We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.
Exhibit 18
May 12, 2000

Members
Main Place Funding, LLC
100 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28255

Dear Members:

We are  providing  this letter to you for  inclusion  as an exhibit to your Form
10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have been provided a copy of the Company's  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2000. Note 2 therein describes a change in accounting
principle from proforma disclosure of income taxes attributable to activities of
the Company to providing income taxes attributable to such activities. It should
be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over
another  for  income  taxes   attributable   to  the  operating   activities  of
single-member  limited  liability  companies  has  not  been  addressed  in  any
authoritative accounting literature,  and in expressing our concurrence below we
have  relied  on  management's  determination  that this  change  in  accounting
principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management's stated reasons and
justification for this change in accounting  principle in the Form 10-Q, and our
discussions  with  management as to their judgment  about the relevant  business
planning  factors  relating to the change,  we concur with  management that such
change represents, in the Company's circumstances,  the adoption of a preferable
accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
20.

We have not audited any  financial  statements  of the Company as of any date or
for any period  subsequent to December 31, 1999.  Accordingly,  our comments are
subject  to  change  upon  completion  of an audit of the  financial  statements
covering the period of the accounting change.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, David Szostak, hereby certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PetroAlgae Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PetroAlgae Inc.



|                     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|/s/    David Szostak
|Name:                |  | David Szostak                
|Title:               |  | President                    
|                     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
|                    
|Dated: May 15, 2009 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to
be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[House]
[Pages H141-H142]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   FOOTBALL BOWL VICTORIES FOR RICE UNIVERSITY AND THE UNIVERSITY OF 
                                HOUSTON

  (Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas. Madam Speaker, well, in talking about bowl 
games, I have certainly got to rise and salute the City of Houston, the 
fourth largest city in the Nation. We had two universities win their 
bowl games.
  Rice University and the University of Houston proudly won their bowl 
games and showed the world that football is played in large cities. Let 
me congratulate Rice University, which has one of the highest academic 
standards and standings in the United States of America, along with the 
proudness of their football team, and, yes, the University of Houston 
that is now reaching

[[Page H142]]

to be a world-renowned research institution that the State of Texas 
truly needs. They won their bowl game, having not won one in a number 
of years.
  It's exciting to see the manner of enthusiasm amongst the alumni and 
our schools. Obviously our schools are there to educate, but it really 
is grand for the City of Houston and all of its population to celebrate 
two great winners, Rice University and the University of Houston, who 
won their bowl games, 2008.
  Go forever, Rice and the University of Houston.

                          ____________________
```
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Page 1 of 1

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 30

January 10, 1985

Bob Hykan 

Office of Attorney General 

1525 Sherman Street, 3rd Floor 

Denver, Colorado 80203

TOPIC: LOADING FACILITY/SURFACE MINING OPERATIONS

INQUIRY: Under what circumstances are loading facilities considered a surface coal mining 

operation, requiring a permit under SMCRA? Has there been any case law interpreting the 

phrases "at or near" and "in connection with"?

SEARCH RESULTS:

Mrs. Petruska is currently researching the definition of surface coal mining operations/offsite 

facilities for a significant issue report. She called Mr. Hykan to discuss documents identified that 

might be applicable. January 7th, the nine Interior Board decisions listed below were forwarded.

WESTERN ENGINEERING, INC., 1 IBSMA 202 (1980). 

DRUMMOND COAL, 2 IBSMA 96 (1980). 

ROBERTS BROTHERS COAL CO. INC., 2 IBSMA 284 (1980). 

REITZ COAL CO., 3 IBSMA 260 (1981). 

ROSS TIPPLE CO., 3 IBSMA 322 (1981). 

ANN LORENTZ COAL CO., 79 IBLA 34 (1984). 

REITZ COAL CO., 83 IBLA 198 (1984). 

DEBORD v WATT, IBLA 82-99 (ED Ky 1982). 

DEBORD v DINCO, slip op. (1984).

January 9th, a follow-up call was made to see if additional information would be helpful.

The significant issue report on surface coal mining operations/offsite facilities will be forwarded 

when completed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 61

 Expressing the sense of Congress that all trade agreements the United 
States enters into, should provide reasonable access and collaboration 
of each nation involved in such an agreement, for the purpose of search 
and recovery activities relating to members of the United States Armed 
    Forces missing in action from prior wars or military conflicts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2017

 Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Connolly) submitted 
    the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that all trade agreements the United 
States enters into, should provide reasonable access and collaboration 
of each nation involved in such an agreement, for the purpose of search 
and recovery activities relating to members of the United States Armed 
    Forces missing in action from prior wars or military conflicts.

Whereas the Department of Defense Prisoners of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) 
        Accounting Agency must currently approach MIA recovery operations on a 
        country by country basis via diplomatic, civil, and military 
        negotiations;
Whereas countries utilizing mutually beneficial trade agreements with the United 
        States should provide a transparent and efficient process to aid in the 
        recovery of United States POW/MIA operations;
Whereas the Department of Defense estimates approximately 1,627 United States 
        citizens who served during the Vietnam War are still unaccounted for in 
        Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia despite quarterly Joint Field Activity 
        excavation and recovery efforts;
Whereas some 73,000 members of the United States Armed Forces remain unaccounted 
        for throughout Europe, China, and Japan after sacrificing their lives 
        during World War II; and
Whereas nearly 8,000 members of the United States Armed Forces are still missing 
        on the Korean Peninsula after bravely serving during the Korean War: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that all trade agreements the United 
States enters into, should provide reasonable access and collaboration 
of each nation involved in such an agreement, for the purpose of search 
and recovery activities relating to members of the United States Armed 
Forces missing in action from prior wars or military conflicts.
                                 <all>
```
----

| Reference: | Purchase      Agreement No. 3219 (the Purchase Agreement) between The Boeing Company      (Boeing) and American Airlines, Inc. (Customer) relating to Model 787-923      aircraft |
|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1.   | Inspection      Process |
|----------------|-------------------------|

----

----

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A ii |
|--------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A iii |
|---------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 1 |
|-------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 2 |
|-------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 3 |
|-------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 4 |
|-------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 5 |
|-------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 6 |
|-------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 7 |
|-------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 8 |
|-------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 9 |
|-------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 10 |
|--------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 11 |
|--------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 12 |
|--------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 13 |
|--------------------|

----

|   |
|--------|

| Rev      A 14 |
|--------------------|

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H142]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             SPECIAL ORDERS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 6, 2009, and under a previous order of the House, the following 
Members will be recognized for 5 minutes each.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-27-2000
<CASH>                                             189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     71,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,307
<PP&E>                                          59,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,918
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,690
<SALES>                                         54,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,205
<CGS>                                           39,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,070
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,225)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,225)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 91373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26864]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2024-HA-0075]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs 
(OASD(HA)), Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
19, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372-7574, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Joint Outpatient Experience 
Surveys (JOES); OMB Control Number 0720-JOES.
    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 310,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 310,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 5.1354 minutes (specific JOES surveys 
range from 3-7 minutes per response).
    Annual Burden Hours: 26,533.
    Needs and Uses: The core objective of the JOES surveys is to 
systematically assess Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries' 
perceptions of their outpatient care quality when received directly at 
Military Treatment Facilities (MTFs) and through civilian network 
providers reimbursed by the MHS. Data insights guide efforts to 
optimize care delivery across the MHS. The JOES survey suite leverages 
industry best practices to regularly measure patient satisfaction 
across the facets of outpatient care. Data-driven insights from this 
comprehensive assessment inform systematic quality improvement efforts 
for healthcare delivery optimization across the MHS. Joint Outpatient 
Experience Survey (JOES) instruments include: JOES, JOES-CAHPS, JOES-
Dental, JOES-Ambulatory, JOES Walk-in Contraceptive Clinic, and JOES-
Emergency Department. The JOES-CAHPS surveys adhere to industry 
protocols outlined by the Clinician & Group Consumer Assessment of 
Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) for measuring patient 
satisfaction.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Matt Eliseo.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas.

    Dated: November 13, 2024.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-26864 Filed 11-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
```
Exhibit 21
                                                                      ----------


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



                      Name                                       Jurisdiction of
                      ----                                        Organization
                                                                  ------------

  AMREP Corporation (Registrant)                                 Oklahoma
    American Republic Investment Co.                             Delaware
      AMREP Southwest Inc.                                       New Mexico
        Outer Rim Investments, Inc.                              New Mexico
           Two Commerce LLC                                      Florida
        AMREPCO Inc.                                             Colorado
        El Dorado at Santa Fe, Inc.                              New Mexico
      Kable Media Services, Inc.                                 Delaware
        Kable News Company, Inc.                                 Illinois
           Kable Fulfillment Services, Inc.                      Delaware
           Kable Distribution Services of Canada, Ltd.           Ontario, Canada
        Kable Distribution Services, Inc.                        Delaware
           Kable News International, Inc.                        Delaware
        Palm Coast Data Holdco, Inc.                             Delaware
           Palm Coast Data LLC                                   Delaware
        Kable Specialty Packaging Services LLC                   Delaware
        Kable Staffing Resources LLC                             Delaware
    El Dorado Utilities, Inc.                                    New Mexico