p. 1


# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 316 ) IV-B-2 0 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:59AM Sheet 316 of 325P. 2 9 

### n 

# RADIA N 

# A-83-2 7 *^| L CORPORATIO N IV-B-2 0

MEMORANDU M

To : Wal t Stevenson , EPA/OAQPS/ESE D From : Davi dWhite , Radia nCorporatio n Date : Apri l 30 , 198 7 Subject : Critiqu e o f th e CIB O Boile r Replacemen t Surve y 1. 0 INTRODUCTIO N I nSeptembe r 1984 , th e Counci l o f Industria l Boile r Owner s (CIBO ) surveye da numbe r o f industria l boile r owner s regardin g completed , underway , an dplanne dinstallation s o f industria l boiler s betwee n197 9 an d 1988 . O n Jul y 30 , 1985 , CIB O sen t EPA a lette r containin g thei r interpretatio no f th e survey . Base donthes e data , CIB O conclude dtha t 1 ) roughl y 8 0 percen t o f th e new boiler s wer e replacement s fo r existin g boiler s an d 2 ) installatio n o f new industria l boiler s resulte dina decreas e inoveral l S0 ? emissions . Th e secondconclusio nwa s base do nCIBO' s findin g tha t mos t o f th e new boiler s replace dolder , les s efficien t boiler s tha t had highe r emission s tha nnew

boilers . Thi s memorandum

review s th e raw

dat a collecte db

y CIB O an

d critique s th e methodolog y

use di nit s interpretation . Th e CIB O result s ar e als o compare dt o a subsequen t surve y conducte db

y EPA . 2. 0 REVIEW

O F TH E CIB O SURVE YDAT A Desig no f th e Surve y

For m Th e CIB O surve y

for m (se e Appendi xA ) consist s o f a one-pag e question nair e divide dint o thre e sections : 1 ) project s finishe dsinc e 197 9 o r currentl y

unde r constructio n(Sectio nA o nth e form) , 2 ) project s funde dbu t no t ye t constructe d(Sectio nB) , an d 3 ) project s planne dthroug h1988 , bu t no t ye t funde d(Sectio nC) . Onl y boiler s wit ha capacit y o f 80,00 0 lb s steam/h r (pph ; roughl y equa l t o 10 0 millio nBtu/h r hea t input ) wer e t o b e listed . Whethe r th e recipient s receive dadditiona l instruction s explainin g how t o complet e th e for m i s no t known .
Progres s Center/320 0 E
. Chape l Hil l Rd./Nelso n Hwy./P.O
. Bo x13000/Researc h Triangl e Park , N.C
. 27709/(919)541*910 0I!

Revie w o f th e surve y

for m suggest s tha t dat a fo r ne w boiler s (includin g stea m capacity , fuel , an

dprojecte dannua l S0 2 , PM , an dN O emissions ) wer e t o b e liste donth e lef t sid e o f th e form . Comparabl e dat a onexistin g boiler s tha t wer e replace db y th e new

boiler s wer e t o b e liste donth e righ t sid e o f th e form . A

complete dfor

m tha t liste ddat a onbot hth e lef t an d righ t side s woul dpresumabl y identif y

a replacemen t boiler . Expansio n boiler s (i.e. , thos e no t replacin g anexistin g boiler ) woul dhav e dat a onl y onth e lef t sid e o f th e form . Th e for m di dno t as k fo r informatio nonwhy th e new boiler s wer e installe do r wha t happene dt o th e existin g boilers . Usin g onl y

th e dat a containe donth e form , classificatio no f boiler s a s replacemen t versu s expansio ni s uncertai ni nman y situtations . Fo r example , a larg e new

boile r installe dt o mee t additiona l stea m deman da t a

nenlarge d manufacturin g plan t coul db e classifie da s a replacemen t fo r a nexistin g boile r tha t wa s to o smal l t o mee t th e plant' s increase dstea m demand . A

n alternate , an

dperhap s mor e appropriat e interpretation , woul db e tha t th e new boile r wa s a

nexpansio nboile r installe dbecaus e o f increase dstea m demand . I t i s als o difficul t t o determin e whethe r a new boile r wa s installe dt o replac e a nexistin g boile r a t th e sam e sit e o r t o suppl y

stea m t o a ne w plan t whic hwa s buil t t o replac e anexistin g plan t locate d elsewher e i nth e country . Whil e th e ne t impac t onboile r capacit y i s simila r inbot hcases , knowin g why a new boile r wa s installe di s importan t inassessin g futur e boile r sale s an demissions . Compositio no f th e Sample dBoiler s Twenty-seve ncomplete dsurve y forms , terme d"cas e histories " b y CIBO , wer e include di nth e CIB O lette r t o EPA (se e Appendi xB) . Ho w thes e 2 7 respondent s wer e selecte do r ho w many additiona l companie s receive dth e survey , bu t di dno t retur nit , i s unknown . Becaus e suc hinformatio ni s essentia l fo r judgin g whethe r a surve y i s representativ e o f a large r population , i t i s difficul t t o generaliz e th e CIB O surve y result s t o th e tota l numbe r o f new

boiler s installed . Revie w o f th e Surve y

Response s Boile r informatio nwa s submitte don2 6 o f th e 2 7 surve y form s (Surve y # 7 indicate dtha t n o new boiler s wer e buil t o r planned) . Examinatio no f th ecomplete dform s suggest s tha t no t al l o f th e respondent s hadth e same

understandin g o f ho

w t o complet e th e surve y form . A s a result , difference s exis t onth e form s whic hcomplicat e thei r interpretation . Fo r example , tw o respondent s (Survey s #1 1 an d#24 ) appea r t o hav e liste dnew replacemen t boiler s onth e righ t sid e o f th e form , rathe r tha nth e existin g boiler s tha t wer e replaced . Onanothe r for m (Surve y #9) , Sectio nA

list s 4 4 new

coal fire dboiler s wit ha tota l capacit y o f 8.6 9 millio npph . Thi s tota l equal s roughl y one-thir do f th e combine dcapacit y o f al l coal-fire dboiler s sol din th e U.S . betwee n197 9 an d198 4 base donsale s dat a compile db y th e America n Boile r Manufacturer s Associatio n(ABMA) . Base do navailabl e boile r sale s data , installatio no f suc ha larg e percentag e o f tota l boile r capacit y b y a singl e responden t seem s unlikel y an dmake s interpretin g th e for m difficult . Th e emission s dat a o neac hsurve y

for m ar e anothe r potentia l sourc e o f erro r du e t o incomplet e responses . Th e surve y for m aske dfo r annua l emission s fro

m th e ne w

boiler s an

dfro m th e existin g boiler s tha t wer e replaced . Informatio no nemission s fro m th e existin g boiler s afte r th e new boiler s wer e installe dwa s no t requested . Thus , emission s fro m existin g boiler s tha t wer e kep t i nservic e a t reduce dload s o r fo r peakin g purpose s ar e no t include dinth e CIB O data . Also , many respondent s di dno t provid e emission s dat a a t all , whil e other s include destimate s onl y fo r N O an d particulate ; SO - dat a ar e presente do nonl y 1 0 o f th e 2 7 surve y forms . 3. 0 CIB O ANALYSI S AN D INTERPRETATIO N O F SURVE YDAT A CIBO' s tabulatio no f th e surve y dat a wa s containe di nit s lette r t o EPA (se e Appendi xC) . Thes e data , organize db y surve y numbe r an

dboile r (bu t withou t consideratio no f whethe r th e boile r wa s constructed, ' funded , o r planned) , wer e summe dt o determin e th e tota l numbe r o f units , tota l capacity , an

dtota l S0 2 emissions . No effor t wa s mad e t o adjus t th e total s fo r missin g data . Revie w o f CIBO' s tabulatio nfounda numbe r o f apparen t classificatio n error s an

domission s resultin g fro m mishandlin g an

dmisinterpretatio no f th e raw surve y data . Fo r example , th e 390,00 0 pphexpansio nboile r o nSurve y # 5 wa s omitte dfro

m th e tabulatio nwhil e th e 600,00 0 pp hboile r o f Surve y

#2 5 wa s counte dthre e times--twic e a s anexpansio nboile r an donc e a s aP. 5

replacemen t boiler . Surve y #1 2 include s tw

o new boiler s tha t ar e replacin g fiv e existin g boilers ; however , al l seve nboiler s wer e liste da s replacemen t boiler s i nth e tabulation . CIB O als o classifie dfou r boiler s o nSurve y #1 5 an dthre e boiler s o

nSurve y #2 2 a s replacemen t boilers , eve nthoug hth e surve y sheet s showe dn o replace dcapacity . Th e respondent' s apparen t misinterpretatio no f th e surve y for m onSurve y

#2 4 (discusse di nSectio n2 ) resulte dinCIB O classifyin g al l eigh t new boiler s a s replacement s rathe r tha na s thre e expansion s an dfiv e replacements . Surve y #2 6 wa s tabulate da s 1 0 separat e boiler s totalin g 4. 9 millio npp ho f capacity ; base do nth e footnote s o

nth e surve y

form , however , i t appear s ther e wer e onl y 5 new boiler s totalin g roughl y 2. 5 millio npp

h(the othe r listing s includ e conver sio no f a

nexistin g boile r fro m oi l t o coa l an

dvariation s i nboile r capa cit y an demissio nrate s fo r tw o boiler s capabl e o f firin g differen t fuel s an dfue l combinations) . Surve y #1 6 wa s als o a conversio no f anexistin g boile r fro

m oi l t o coal , no t a

ninstallatio no f a replacemen t boiler . Th e tablulatio nals o include s severa l boiler s onSurvey s # 9 an d#2 0 tha t ar e below th e 80,00 0 pp

hminimu m siz e limi t specifie dinth e surve y (an dthu s shoul dno t hav e bee ninclude dinth e analysis) . Ther e wer e als o problem s decidin g how t o interpre t response s onsome o f th e surve y

forms . Fo r example , Survey s # 5 an d#2 3 lis t new

boiler s whic h ar e muc hlarge r tha nth e boiler s the y replaced , suggestin g tha t expansio no f steam suppl y wa s probabl y

th e primar y

reaso nfo r buildin g th e ne w boiler s rathe r tha nreplacemen t o f existin g boilers . I t i s als o unclea r whethe r th e cogeneratio nboiler s liste do nSurvey s # 6 an

d#2 0 shoul db e considere d replacement s fo r th e existin g proces s stea m boiler s o r a s expansio nboiler s providin g steam

fo r new

turbine s use dt o generat e electricity ; CIB O classi fie dthem

a s replacemen t boilers . Classificatio no f th e boiler s o nSurve y # 9 i s als o difficul t becaus e o f uncertaintie s i nhow t o rea dth e surve y

for m an dth e extremel y

larg e numbe r o f boiler s liste d(se e Sectio n2) . I f th e abov e error s ar e corrected , th e percentag e o f new boiler s installe da s replacement s woul dhav e bee nroughl y 6 0 percent , rathe r tha n8 0 percen t a s CIB O concluded .P. 6

Sulfu r Dioxid e Emission s Th e secondmajo r conclusio ndraw nb y CIB O wa s tha t tota l S0 2 emission s decrease dbecaus e o f boile r replacements . A s state dpreviously , becaus e o f missin g S0 2 dat a o

nmos t o f th e surve y

forms , thi s conclusio nwa s base do n dat a fro m jus t 1 0 o f th e 2 7 surveys . Thes e 1 0 survey s includ e dat a o n3 1 new boilers , o r roughl y 2 5 percen t o f th e new boiler s covere db

y th e survey . O f thes e 3 1 boilers , CIB O classifie d2 9 (9 4 percent ) a s replacement s an d2 ( 6 percent ) a s expansions . Base do nthi s highpercentag e o f replacemen t boilers , CIBO' s conclusio ntha t installatio no f new boiler s decrease s ne t S 0 2 emission s i s understandable . However , a s discusse dabove , CIBO' s dat a indicat e tha t installatio no f new expansio nboiler s account s fo r roughl y 4 0 percen t o f new

boile r sale s rathe r tha n6 percen t a s represente dinth e S0 2 data . Becaus e new

expansio nboiler s contribut e new emission s tha t ar e no t offse t b y reduce demission s fro m existin g boilers , th e under-representatio n o f thes e boiler s inth e emissio ndat a represent s a majo r sourc e o f statis tica l bia s inan

y subsequen t analysi s o f emissions . Th e CIB O methodolog y als o fail s t o includ e emission s fro m th e "replaced " boiler s tha t continu e operatin g (althoughfrequentl y a t reduce dloads ) afte r new boiler s ar e installed . Becaus e thes e omission s resul t inunderestimatin g tota l S0 2 emissions , th e conclusio ntha t tota l emission s decreas e ma y b e simpl y

th e resul t o f incomplet e data . 4. 0 COMPARISO N

WIT H EPA' S BOILE RREPLACEMEN T SURVE Y Durin g th e summe r o f 1986 , EPA conducte da muc hlarge r an dmor e 2 detaile dsurve y

o f industria l boile r sale s betwee n198 1 an d1984 . Th e surve y include d11 5 boile r project s comprisin g a tota l o f 15 5 new boiler s large r tha n10 0 millio nBtu/h r an d29 1 existin g boilers . Onl y project s actuall y buil t wer e surveyed . Base doncompariso nwit hABM A sale s data , th e surve y reflect s essentiall y 10 0 percen t o f th e industria l boiler s sol di n thi s siz e rang e durin g th e surve y period . Inadditio nt o statistic s o nboile r siz e an

dS0 2 emissions , EPA als o collecte dinformatio no nwhy th e ne w

boiler s wer e ordered , th e ke y decisio n variable s an

deconomi c sensitivit y affectin g th e desig no f th e project , an d th e operationa l statu s o f th e existin g boiler(s ) afte r installatio no f th eP. 7

ne w boiler(s) . Thi s sectio nbriefl y review s th e similaritie s an d difference s betwee nth e CIB O an dEP A surveys . Replacemen t Versu s Expansio nBoiler s Th e EPA surve y aske deac hresponden t t o specif y th e reaso nfo r instal ling a new

boiler . Base do

nthes e responses , EPA conclude dtha t 5 0 percen t o f th e project s installe dnew boiler s a s replacement s fo r existin g boiler s (relate dt o fue l switchin g an dreplacemen t o f boiler s inpoo r condition ) whil e th e balanc e wer e fo r new application s (additiona l capacit y a t a n existin g site , constructio no f a new plant , an

dcogeneration) . Thi s compare s t o CIBO' s origina l estimat e o f 8 0 percen t an dth e revise destimat e o f roughl y

6 0 percent . Some o f th e difference s betwee nthes e number s reflec t th e uncertaint y i nth e CIB O surve y

dat a o f whethe r a ne w boile r recorde da s a replacemen t wa s installe dt o replac e a boile r a t th e same plan t o r a t a differen t location . EPA' s surve y limite dreplacemen t t o mea ninstallatio na t th e sam e plant . I f th e CIB O dat a wer e adjuste dfo r thi s definitiona l difference , th e percentag e o f replacemen t boiler s inth e CIB O surve y woul dprobabl y

b e lower . A s a result , i t appear s th e EPA surve y an dth e adjuste danalysi s o f th e CIB O surve y

bot hfoundtha t fo r th e time perio dsurveyed , replacemen t boiler s represen t roughl y 5 0 percen t o f new

boile r sales . Chang e i nSulfu r Dioxid e Emission s Th e EPA surve y conclude dtha t S0 2 emission s fro m plant s installin g new boiler s betwee n1981-198 4 increase db y 6 8 percen t (174,96 0 annua l ton s afte r th e ne w boiler s wer e installe dversu s 103,83 8 annua l ton s before) . O f th e tota l emission s afte r installatio no f th e new boilers , 7 3 percen t wer e fro m new boiler s whil e th e remainin g 2 7 percen t wer e fro m continue doperatio no f existin g boiler s a t reduce dload . Estimate demission s fro m continue d operatio no f th e existin g boiler s wer e no t include dinth e CIB O analysis . I f emission s fro

m continue doperatio no f existin g boiler s wer e exclude dfro m th e EPA surve y data , S0 2 emission s woul dhav e stil l increase db y 24,49 8 ton s (2 4 percent) . Ke y

factor s influencin g th e difference s inth e overal l conclusion s reache db y th e CIB O an

dEP A survey s appea r t o resul t fro m th e lac k o f dat a inth e CIB O surve y o nemission s fro

m new expansio nboiler s an d fro m existin g boiler s afte r th e new boiler s ar e installed .P. 8

5. 0 REFERENCE S 1 . Lette r fro

m William B . Mar x(Counci l o f Industria l Boile r Owners ) t o FredL . Porte r (OAQPS/EPA) , date dJul y 30 , 1985 . 2 . U . S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgency , Surve y o f Ne w Industria l Boile r Projects--1981-1984 . EPA-450/3-87-006 . Apri l 1987 .P. 9

APPENDI XA CIB O SURVE YFOR

MNumbe r and .

Capacit y

• BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d

_SO
- PM an

d NO x Numbe r and . Fue l Emission s Capacit yFue l A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D O R I NPROCES S (BAC K T O 1979 )

B . INSTALLATION S FUNDE D

C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTE D (To 1988 )

* (Wit h a boile r capacit y> 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . I n thousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Includ e mixtures , denoting individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r year o f eac hpollutan t 2-Digi t SI C (I f Applicable ) SO , PM an

d NO x Emission s

10 0 MMB )p.1 1

APPENDI XB CIB O SURVE YDAT A1 . BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y S O PM an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y Fue l S0 2 P M an d NO x Emission s A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D OR I NPROCES S (BACK T O 1979 ) 1-350,00 0 #/H

R Bark/Coal/Oi l . 7 100,00 0 ff/H R 4 35,00 0 #/H

R 75,00 0 #/H

R 60,00 0 tf/HR # 6 Oi l # 6 Oi l # 6 Oil/Bar k # 6 Oil/Bar k . 7 . 7

B . INSTALLATION S FUNDE D

C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (To 1988 )

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . I nthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r year of eachpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 6 2-Digi t SI C2 „ BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I C Applicabl e Numbe r and . Capacit y Fue l S O P M and NO x Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y S O P M an d NO x Fue l Emission s

1- 2 5 0 KLBS/H

R A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 ) P C

B . 1-2 0 KLB/H R 1-6 0 KLB/H

R 1-3 0 KLB/H

R 1-8 0 KLB/H

R 1-1 9 KLB/H

R INSTALLATION S FUNDE D

C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 ) N . Ga s

N . Ga s N . Ga s N . Ga s N . Ga s

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . I nthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eachpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 6 2-Digi t SI C3 . BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne w Boiler : Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicabl e Numbe r and . Capacit y SO „ P M an d NQ x Fuel ' E

mission s 

## 9 > Numbe r and . Capacit y' Fue l S0 2 P M and NO x Emission s INSTALLATION S FINISHE D OR I NPROCES S (BACK T O 1979 ) 197 9 1-150,00 0 lbs/HR Coa l 198 3 1-100,00 0 lb/HR Coa l 198 0 1-150,00 0 lb/HR Woo d 0.251b/lM M BTU S (PM ) 0.161b/IM

M BTU S (PM ) Non e

B . INSTALLATION S FUNDE D -None - -None C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTE D (T o 1988 ) -None - -None -

* (Wit h a boile r capacit y> 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . I n thousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Includ e mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r of eac h pollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 2 2-Digi t SI CBOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y * * *
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and , Capacit y SO
- P M an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y

' Fue l S0 ? P M and NO x Emission s A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KTO 1979 )

1-88,00 0 #/H

RCoa l (10 5 Btu/hr ) B . INSTALLATION S FUNDED (t o start-u

p in1985 ) 1-20,00 0 U/H

ROil , Ga s 1-1 0 0,00 0 #/H

ROil , Ga s C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 )

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . I nthousand s of pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r year of eachpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

JLSL 2-Digi t SI CBOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boilcr(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y SO - P M an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacity Fue l S O P M an d NO x Emission s A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 ) 1 - 390,00 0 #/H

RCoa l i f 100 % Coa l 24-43 ' 22 8 159 6 None & (1232 ) Wood - i f 100 % W

W 0 27 0 196 1 wast e 1 - 770,00 0 #/H

RPulv . Coa l 432 9 35 9 216 5 1-145,00 0 8/H R# 6 Oi l 209 4 7 6 29 6 B . INSTALLATION S fruN^ED- 300 */"*- * 6 0i l 16fi 5 6 0 23 4

None C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 ) Non e

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . Inthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r year of eachpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 6 _2-Digi t SI CG: Boile r "Expansion-Replacement " Surve y

Ne w Boiler s Boiler s Replace d No . an d Capacit y ( D A . Installation s Finishe d 1-Ga s turbine/HRS G 3 6 MW , 180,00 0 lb/h r stea m B . installation s Funde d 1-Ga s turbinc/HRS G 4 5 MW , 300,00 0 lb/h t stea m C . projecte d Installation s Ga s turbine/HRS G 9 5 MW/500,00 0 lb/hr . stea m ( 4 units ) i Ga s turbine/HRS G 9 5 MW/125,00 0 lb/hr . 3tea m ( 4 units ) Fue l

Ga s

Ga s

Coal / Woo d Coal / Wood S 0 2

0

0

102 0

6 8 0 P

M

1 5

5

12 4

18 6 NO x

34 2

71 9

92 8

92 8 No . an d Capacit y ( 1 )

2-300,00 0 lb/hr.stm . »

2-300,00 0 lb/hr.stm .

2-550,00 0 lb/hr . stm .
2-woo d 6-oil/ga s 1,030,00 0 lb/hr . stm . Fue l

Gas / O i l

Gas / O i l

Gas / oi l
Gas / O i l Woo d S

O 2

32 8

2 8

142 1

161 3 P

M

3 9

8

11 3

42 2 NO x

4 9 3

40 6

89 1

164 2

(1 ) Tota l capacity lbs/h r stea m SI C 2 6/ . m DOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler 3 Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and , _S O P M an d NOx Numbe r and , SO . P M an d NO x Capacit yFue l Emission s Capacit yFue l Emission s

A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D OR I NPROCES S (BAC K T O 1979 ) >80,00 0 »/H

R Non e

B . INSTALLATION S PUNDE D » • >80,00 0 l/H

R . Non e C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTE D (To 1988 ) Unknown . Possibl e conversio n t o coal / liqui d slurryfo r 1- 2 Boi 1 , 'i s i n thi s siz e range . Dependen t upo n availabl e technology .
* (Wit h a boile r capacit y> 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 10 0 MMB ) 1 . I n thousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Includ e mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eac h pollutan t
20 . 10 . Tf

i 2-Dlqi t SI CBOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and , _S0 2 PM an d NO x Numbe r and , SO

_P M an

d NO x Capacit yFue l Emission s Capacit yFue l Emission s 3

A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D O R INPROCES S (BACK T O 1979 )

NO - .4 2 lbs/10 6 BT U 2-75,00 0 #/H

R Coa l Paift . - .05 8 lbs/10 6 BTU 2-42,000#/HR Oil/Ga s N o Tes t Dat a

(. 8 Sulphur ) 1 1/2-2 % Sulphu r

B . INSTALLATION S FUNDE D

C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTE D (To 1988 ) Star t U p Ja n O r Fe b 198 5 1-150,00 0 S/H

R Coa l 3-100,0 0 #/H R Oil/Ga s N o Tes t Dat a (. 8 Sulphur ) ! 1/2- 2 1/2 % Sulphu r

* (Wit h a boile r capacit y> 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 10 0 MMB ) 1 . I n thousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Includ e mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eac h pollutan t
2 2 2-Digi t SI CBOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y * t Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable )

i Numbe r and , _S0 „ PM an d NO x Numbe r and , S0

_PM and NO x Capacit yFue l Emission s Capacit yFue l Emission s

A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D OR INPROCES S (BACK T O 1979 ) 9-150,00 0 Coa l 2-300,00 0 Coa l 4
- 60,00 0 Coa l 15-240,00 0 Coa l 1-300,00 0 Coa l 13-200,00 0 Coa l
B . INSTALLATION S FUNDE D
C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTE D (T o 1988 ) 13-240,00 0 2-240,00 0 1-300,00 0 13-200,00 0 Coa l

Oil , Ga s Coa l

. Coa l

* (Wit h a boile r capacit y> 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 10 0 MMB ) 1 . I n thousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Includ e mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eac h pollutan t
3 7 2-Digi t SI C1 0 BOILE R"EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y*
Ne w Boiler s Boiler(s ) Replaced (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y _SO

_P M an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y

J Fue l S0 ? P M an d NO x Emission s A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 ) No . 1 Coa l Boile r Bituminou s S O = 304 1 No . 1 Powe r Boile r 60,00 0 No . 6 S O = 899 0 450,00 0 pp

hCoa l P M = 25 3 No . 2 Powe r Boile r 100,00 0 pp hFue l P

M = 133 9 N O = 177 6 No . 3 Powe r Boile r 300,00 0 pp hOi l xNo . 4 Powe r Boile r 125,00 0 pp h N

O = 95 0 x

, i B . INSTALLATION S FUNDED

C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 )

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . I nthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eac hpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 6 2-Digi t SI C-1 1 BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y S0 2 PM an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y Fue l SO „ P M and NO x Emission s A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D OR I NPROCES S (BAC

K T O 1979 )

B . 2-18 5 MPP H INSTALLATION S FUNDE D 2-10 0 MPP

H C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED * U -C¥c- d 3$ftitf) eir s } P M /v--80TPY/Bl r (

?

. 1 lb/MM Bt u Pul v Coa l ^1 7 TPY/Bl r @

Actua l Emissio i Rat e NO x —580TPY/Bl r Q

. 7 lb/MM Bt u No. 6 Oi l NO X 27 6 TP Y Tota l

Permitte d

* (Wit h a boile r capacit y> 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . I n thousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Includ e mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eachpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 8 2-Digi t SI CNumbe r and L

Ca i

None BOILE R R R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y * p^ilprts ) Re ] Ne wBoiler s

• S0 ? P M an d NCj x 2 Emission s Numbe r and ^ Ca i >lace d (I f Applicable ) S0 2 P M an

d tjO x Emission s



### A 

# . wsssiffiffiHLHHisaffi^EJi L PR 

### 0CESS_(BtCK^T0a2 m None

None (2J-12 5

. (Wit h 

### a b 

### oU « capacit y S O 00 0 lb 

### s./hr . i - i — 1 . ^fu"^^^/^ - iSlvid- V fuel s 2 3 

### - ronsTe^year^'eac h pollatan

t

2 8 2-Digi t SI C

2 8 2-Digi t SI C

I t t n ,r.^A r-r-. Droliminar v desiqi l dat a1 4 BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y 2 S0 ? P M an d N 9 X Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y Fue l S 0 2 P M an d NO x Emission s A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D O RI N PROCES S (BAC KT O 1979 ) A 2 x100,00 0 (25 0 MMB ) Bituminou s 1806-33-46 8 Coa l 2 x35,00 0 1 x54,00 0 1 x100,00 0 Bitminou s 2524-311-70 5

Bituminou s 3.4 % S # 6 Oi l
B . INSTALLATION S FUNDE D

B 2 x150,00 0 (SCB ) B . 2 x250,00 0 (SCB ) C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTE D (T o 1988 ) Anthracit e Cul m Coa l 514-51-51 4

420-74-75 0

* 1 . 2 . 3 . 0.3 % S # 6 Oi l Natura l Ga s 2-100,00 0 2-60,00 0 1-70,00 0 1-90,00 0 1-104,00 0 1-110,00 0 (Wit ha boile r capacit y > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t I nthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m Includ e mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s Ton s pe r yea r o f eac hpollutan t Su b Bituminou s 1428-127-N A Coa l 459-142-53 8

10 0 MMB )

2 8 2-Digi t SI C A-Replacemen t i n kin d - n o additiona l proces s stea m requirement . B - Replacemen t i n kind , bu t wit h ne t additiona l stea mproduce dfo r cogeneratio n condensin g ..•_._

_M „ „,-•.,-•. • • . ,• .-.n-^ x proces s "st-pa

mrpnu i rpmenf c .1 5 BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boilcr(s ) Replace d (I C Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y 2 S O P M an d NOx Fue l Emission s Numbe r and 1 Capacit y Fue l S O P M and NOx Emission s
1-120,00 0 Stoke r 1-150,00 0 Stoke r A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D OR I NPROCES S (BACK T O 1979 ) Coa l Coa l PM 1 9

2 1 B . to n yr . to n yr . NO X 37 8 to n

yr . » 41 2 to n yr . INSTALLATION S FUNDE D

1-120,00 0 Stoke r 1-100,00 0 Stoke r C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTE D (T o 1988 ) Coa l P M 1 9 to n NO

yr . 37 8 to n

yr . Coa l
* 1 . 2 . 3 . (Wit

ha boile r capacit y> 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t I nthousand s of pounds/hr . stea m Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s Ton s pe r year o f eac hpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 8 2-Digi t SI C16' . BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and , 2 S0 2 P M an d NO xNumbe r and , S0 2 PM an d NO x Capacit yFue l Emission s Capacity Fue l Emission s 3
A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 ) 1-15 0 Coa l 44 0 1 46 4 1 | 6 Oi l 44 0 6 0 49 8

B . INSTALLATION S FUNDED

C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 )

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 10 0 MMB ) 1 . I nthousand s of pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r year of eac hpollutan t
21 2-Digi t SI C 'Conversio n1 7 BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit yJ Fue l S0 2 P M an d NO x Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y Fue l S0 ? P M and NO x Emission s A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 )

B . INSTALLATION S FUNDED

C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 ) On e (1 ) 200,00 0 #/H ROi l & Ga s Fire d Packag e Boile r t o replac e fou

r (4 ) ol d G& O Fire d Packag e Boiler s aggregatin

g 360,00 0 l/HR .

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . I nthousand s of pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eachpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 8 2-Digi t SI C1* 8 BOILE R"EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y*
Ne w Boiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y

' Fuel ' SO

_P M an d NO x Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y

' Fue l S0 ? PM an d NO x Emission s
2 - 220,00 0 PPH each A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 ) Pulverized Coa l Ga s Ignitor s 649 0 T/Yr . S0 2

. 7 lbs./MMBT

UN O * 5 - 75,00 0 PPH Stoke r

eachCoa l 649 0 T/Yr . S0 2 N O N A x
B . INSTALLATION S FUNDED

C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 )

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 10 0 MMB ) 1 . I nthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eachpollutan t
2 6 2-Digi t SI C
* Ma xpermitted1 9 BOILE R"EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y* * * Ne w Boiler s Boiler(s ) Replaced (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y S0 2 P M an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y

' Fue l S0 2 P M an d NO x Emission s A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 ) 1 - 110,00 0 #/h

r Coa l 3 - 60,00 0 #/h r Oil.Ga s
B . INSTALLATION S FUNDED

C INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 )

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . Inthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r year o f eachpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 8 2-Digi t SI C
* * Telephone Repor tP.3 0 2 0 .

BSII U sissv su e m:u.

r, ib. v KOI

/

Subtota l Kc u Sublcts l lft[*la:c.-.er. t Subtota l Ccgentralio n

IOTRL ' Fulur j Project s

S-blcU l KJ W Si-Meta l Fe:h:v.er. t S-.Mcla l Cc;twalie s

IDlP i M

O Jepiacewn t 3 9 Ha

« 2 8 Pc?!a:er:in l S J *;? ! arden t 8 3 Gfj-Iawsn l 3 0 J:r!a.-i-.en t 11 0 8e;!/Ccjep(7iV70 ) 2 WEtplacwtn l 8 0 Seplarcren t 6 0 Re-jlacsien l 7 0 Peplecr.sn t 3 0 iii 7 0 IJ T SIHIU ? HI E 

### n n ri a KPLKE O 3-9 1 'Jasl e woodKitura l oa s 11-5 1 S-vA-s t

' Ron

e 2-8 2 In duasi e Eca l 2-? 2 L'sst c hiUna l gas ) Katura l ga s 12-8 2 Uest e ujo dNatura l ga s 6-EJ Offic e Iras hKatura l ca s 7-6 3 Uast e uoo dKatura l ga s 7-8 3 Uasi e uoo dfel gas/Ho . t f.0 . 11-S 3 Uasi e hu!(na t

gas ) Hatura l ga s 1-2 1 Uosl e uco dRa . ( LO . 6-8 5 Uasi e healOw l oas ) Kalura ! ga s 3.21 X 83.32 X 7.15 1 (tr/.-.tiuiilii y capacity ) ico.es :
IC O CtploC*n;n t 6 0 Etpla:t-.sn t -10 0 fep!a::.ien l 15 0 Eeptasien t 17 0 *?e?l/C:?R(2B/l5fl ) 17 0 r.;!/tc;:.«.(50/12O ) 'Jasl e uw dKatura l ga s L'ast e heaKna t

gas ) ? Coa l Coal Uasi e uoo d? l'ast e heaKna l gas ) Kstura l ga s Uast e heaKna t

gas ) Kattra l ga s 0 IS O 27 0 O.OS X

tt. so : 37.SC Z <>";pla:e s utilit ycapacity ) 72 0 100.02 1 ICIfiL S - FiCrsHsiu t

VUV.) t-iF/L'ECIE

O Subtotal tr. I. 1.81 1 S-.t'.clal f.;'..:.rv.[

l.'ES 77.££ I 5-XicU l Cc;t

r t.-aliort HO 20.il ! '.-iiU'.tiutilil y cc;-a:ity ) .;;.>'. ITTR L us s SI C 2 6

1K.C3 I2 1 BOILE R"EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y*
Ne w Boiler s Boiler(s ) Replaced (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y 2 SO , P M an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y Fue l S0 2 P M an d NO x Emission s

(2 ) 120,00 0 A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 ) Coa l S O - 114 1

P M - 6 1 N O - 58 2 x *(3 ) 150,00 0 No . 6 Fue l

B . (on

e uni t wa

xcomplete ) INSTALLATTO^^JNDE D
None C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 ) S0 2 - 211 0 P M - 14 8 N O - 59 6 x

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . Inthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r year o f eachpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 9 2-Digi t SI CIX BOILE R"EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y*
Ne w Boiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicabl e Numbe r and . Capacity ' SO - P M an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y Fue l • SO . P M an d N O x

.12 A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KTO 1979 ) Coa l PM=11. 6 Ton/Yea r Actua l (4 0 Ton/yea r allowable ) *1-306X10~ " BTU/h

r g (N.G . Ignit.)NO x= 28 0 Ton/yea r actua l (28 0 ton/yea r allowable ) 4-248X1 0 BTU/hrleach ] Coa l PM=10 0 Ton/yea r Projecte d Actual(Allowabl e = 15 5 Ton/year ) (Propan e Ig ) NOx=154 0 Ton/yea r Projecte d Actua l (Allowabl e 231 1 Ton/year ) B . INSTALLATION S FUNDED

None C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 ) 2-150X1 0 BTU/hrleach ] Coa l P M = 2 0 Ton/yea r Projec t Actua l (Allowabl e = 4 0 Ton/year ) (N.G . Ighit.)NOx=27 3 Ton/yea r Projecte d vctua l (Allowabl e = 54 6 Ton/year )

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 10 0 MMB ) 1 . I nthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r year o f eachpollutan t
2 1 2-Digi t SI C *Thi s i s a ne

w boile r additio

nan d no t a replacement ; however , i t wa s installed primaril y t o replac * existin g boile r capacity

whil e fou

r olde r boiler s ar e take nou t of servic e sequentiall y fo r2 J BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y' 2 S0 2 P M an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacit y Fue l S0 2 P M and NO x Emission s

275,00 0 l/H

R 420,00 0 l/H

R ONLIN E 198 2 (NOTE : 70 % REPLACEMENT CAPACITY )

Coa l PM-7 0 T/Y r Woo d SO 2 -110 0 T/Yr . Sludg e NOx-110 0 T/Yr . 90,00 0 «/H R 66,00 0 i/H

R SO

_-8 0 Coal/Ga s P M -2 0 T/Yr , Cool/Sludg e NO x 26 0 Bar k Coa l P M - : ? Woo d SO-
- 287 0

NOx
- 167 0 NOTE : Adde d load ; ol d boile r burne d gas . 500,00 0 l/H

R ONLIN E 198 5

Coa l Woo d Sludg e P M - ?

SO--93 5 T/Yr . NOX-212 5 T/H

R 250,00 0 #/H R 170,00 0 #/H

r 170,00 0 #/H

R Oi l SO--495 2 T/Yr . NOx-93 5 T/Yr .

* (Wit h a boile r capacit y> 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . I n thousand s o f pounds/hr . steam 2 . Includ e mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eac h pollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 6 2-Digi t SI C
i i24 . - 'BOILE R"EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y * i Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable )
t . , - . (b ) Numbe r and. ta ' 2 SO - P M an d NO xlc ) Numbe r and , SO - P M an d NO x ( c Capacit y

Fue l Emission s Capacit y Fue l ' Emission s 3 A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 ) 2/23 2 Klb/hr ea Coa l 12 7 89 0 1/19 9 Klb/Hr Coa l n o 76 5 1/14 4 Klb/hr 1 6 Oi l 2 4 11 0 1/18 5 Klb/Hr Coa l 5 0 71 0 i/10 0 Klb/H r Coa l 3 5

2 0 B . INSTALLATION S FUNDE D

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 10 0 MMB ) 1 . I nthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r year o f eachpollutan t 2-Digi t SI C 35 0

C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 ) 2/9 0 Klb/Hr ea . Coa l 2 0 3 4 5

a ) Thes e ar e no t th e manufacture r guarantees , but th e permitted maximu m assumin

g 125 0 BTU/l bstea m b ) Replacement s ar e coa l i nplac e o f natura l ga s o r residua l oi l _* . *o_. * - r- i ,,„ ^ ar-

o t-h p maximu

mlega l allowables , no t actuals , fo r eac h unit .25 . "BOILE R"EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y *
Ne w Boiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y' 2 SO - P M an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and . Capacity

' , S0 2 P M an d NO x Fue l ' Emission s
(1 ) 600,00 0 lb/H

R A . INSTALLATION S FINISHED O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 ) Coa l SO 2 -3,75 0 T.P.Y . (6 ) 600,00 0 lb/H RCoa l P M - 6 0 T.P.Y . NOx - 2,05 0 T.P.Y .

B . INSTALLATION S FUNDED

None C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 )
None S0 2 - . 525 0 T. I P M - 26 2 T.P.Y . NO x- N o Dat a Availabl e

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . I nthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eachpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 8 2-Digi t SI C Note : Th e sixboiler s wer e no t dismantled , but rathe r place d i nstandb

y statu s unti l load increase s dictat e the yb e place d i n service .

### •; i CIB O NSP S BOILE R "EXPANSION-REPI^CEMENT " SURVEY * j$>-



### Nam e Ne wBoiler s

Capacit y Replace d Boilers Bmissions " Fuel 4 

### P

M NO .

> » . • 2 . • i . 

### 400
- 500 ' 500 ' 50 0 ' 

### 400 ' woo d

COi l 

### oi l ccnbin a tio n futur e pea t A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D O R I NPROCES S (BAC K T O 1979 )
1 tryr\& 2 5 1 30 ? 39 1 700 * 

### 1288 V 770 t 890 J 

### 40 TM 2240 k 

### Replace d oi l firin g i n severa l boiler s o f approx . 400,00 0 pp havg . rate . Shutdow n 1 o r 2 ol d boilers . Reduce d loa d o n other s i n standb ystatus .

• ) .

.r ' 

### "500 "

50 0 ' 

## ip o 60 0 500* * co-i l

oi l (standby ) VOD d 

## codf * oi l ~ cc.it ina tio n 

### 127 ^ 273 $ 13( T 2155 J 10S ~ 1050 * 127 a 

### 27i a 

### Notes : *CF° r boile r capacit y

>80,00 0 lbs/hr , i.e . hea t inpu t >10 0 millio nBtu/hr ) Fo r multi-fue l boiler s steam rat e i nthousand s o f lbs/h r fo r eac hfuel . 2 

### Includ c mixtures , denotin g individua l fuels . 3Ton i pe r yea r o f eac hpollutant . ^Ccnment s i nlie uo f data . a 

### Actua l base do n876 0 hours . ^Assume dsam

e a s combination . c 

### Expecte dbase do nelectroscrubbe r performanc e measure d Fue l conversio no nexistin g boile r t o replac e 500,00 0 pp ho noil . Ne w plant .

d 

### Assum e 82 0 xIO 6 

### Btu/h r hea t inpu t an d0.6 » MV10 6 

### Bt u and876 0 hr/y r operation . . e 

### Assume s 80 0 x10 ° Btu/h r inpu t and0.031/10 ° Bt ufo r r 

### 876 0 hrs . f 

### Assum e 0.3I/10 6 

### Btu . -^Measure da t 0.25»/10 6 

### Btu . ^Measure da t 0.44#/10J ? Btu . iMeasure da t 0.27K/10 6 

### Btu . ^Measure davg . o f 0.264/10 6 

### Btu . Estimate da t 0,801/10 ° Btu . 'Actua l tes t data . .•"Estimate .Nam e Ne wBoiler s Capacit y Fue l Replace d Boiler s <! 6 Emission s P M NO . B.••INSTALLATION S FUNDE D

None .
60 0

50 0 30 0 CJ ' INSTALLATION S PROJECTED'(T O 1988 )

eca l o r 480 a 3360 b cc-al/woo d (vit hgas/oi l standby ) 365 c 615 d

re dliquo r 240 a 1680 ° blac k liquo r Replace s * 1 Powe r Boile r rate d700,00 0 pp h o ngas/oil .
Ne w plan t ^ Replace s oi l i n one o rmor e existin g boiler s an d burns liquo rno

w wasted . r

a Assum e 0.1I/10 6 Btu . bAssun e 0.7I/10 6 Btu . c Assum e 0.04 4 gr/sde f

. 8 1 0^ d Assum e 7 0 pp m NO xan d 800 x IO 6 Btu/hr .

SI C 2 6 t oBOILE R "EXPANSION-REPLACEMENT " SURVE Y * 2 7
Ne wBoiler s Boiler(s ) Replace d (I f Applicable ) Numbe r and . Capacit y SO . P M an d NO x Fue l Emission s Numbe r and Capacit y Fue l S0 ? P M and NO x Emission s A . INSTALLATION S FINISHE D O RI N PROCES S (BAC

KT O 1979 ) 3-60 0 Wast e S0 2 357 8 NO x196 0 7-14 5 Oil , Ga s SO 2 - 300 0 NO x- 320 0
B . INSTALLATION S FUNDE D

C . INSTALLATION S PROJECTED (T o 1988 )

* (Wit

ha boile r capacity > 80,00 0 lbs./hr . i.e . inpu t 1 . Inthousand s o f pounds/hr . stea m 2 . Include mixtures , denotin g individua l fuel s 3 . Ton s pe r yea r o f eachpollutan t 10 0 MMB )

2 9 2-Digi t SI CP.3 9

APPENDI XC CIB O TABULATIO N

O F SURVE YDAT AP.4 0

COUNCI L O F INDUSTRIA L BOILE R OWNER S BOILE R REPLACEMEN T SURVE Y Th e informatio n tabulate d belo w i s derive d fro m a CIB O surve yconducte d i n Septembe r 1984 , t o determin e th e replacement / expansio n rati o o f ne w boile r installations . Th e informatio n covers : a ) installation s finishe d o r i n proces s bac k t o 1979 ; b ) installation s no t ye t complete d bu t fo r whic h fund s hav e bee n ap propriated ; c ) futur e installation s projecte d t o 1988 .

Th e response s sho wa 4: 1 replacement/expansio n ratio ; i.e. , approximatel y80 % o f he w boiler s ar e fo r replacemen t pur poses . Th e fuel s o f th e replace d and ne w boilers , and th e numbe r o f boiler s involved , ar e a s follows : Fro m Fue l "Conversions " 4 0 4 3 7 6 5 1 1 5 Oi l Coa l Oi l Oi l Woo d Coa l Ga s T o

Coa l Coa l Woo d Ga s Woo d Woo d Coa l 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 Total s 11 7 6 2 Thus , 11 7 boiler s ar e bein g replace d b y6 2 ne w units , a decreas e o f 5 5 boilers . Ove r 95 % o f th e boiler s tha t ar e bein g retire d fir e fuel s othe r tha n natura l gas .

Th e dat a fro mth e 9 companie s providin g emission s dat a sho w tha t th e replacemen t process , byitself , wil l resul t i n a decreas e i n S0 2 emissions , independen t o f anyNSPS :

No . o f Boiler s Aggregat e Capacit y lbs/h r X 100 0 Aggregat e Inpu t MMBTU/h r Tota l SO

_Emissions , tons/yr Replace d 5 4 7,08 0 8,30 0 36,38 2 Ne w
r 29
- 7,63 0 8,87 0 26,85 6 Ne t Resul t

(Decrease ) (25 ) 55 0 57 0 (9,526 )

Jul y198 5Cas e f Unit s 1 . 2 . 3 . 2

1 4 . 5 . 6 .
7 . 0 8 . 9 . 9

2 4 10 . 11 . 12 .
13 .

* - I nthousand s o f BOILE REXPANSION-REPLACEMEN T SURVE Y EXPANSION

REPLACEMEN T

pound s Capacity * Unit s 1 1 15 0 10 0 1 1 1 1 4 4 0 2 1 15 0 1 5 30 0 1 6 0 1 3 1 2 2 4 1 1

pe r hou r o f boile r steamin g capacit y each . Capacity * 35 0 25 0
8 8 77 0 18 0 30 0 50 0 12 5

- 7 5 15 0 24 0 30 0 20 0 45 0 18 5 12 5 8 0 10 0 67 5 y »

• ->
rCase ! Unit s Capacity * Unit s 14 . 2 2 2 15 . 2 1 1 16 . 1 17 . 1 18 . 2 19 . 1 20 . 1 3 0 1 6 21 . 2 22 . 4 21 0 1 2 23 . 1 42 0 1 1 24 . 2 1 1 1

* I nthousand s o f pound s pe r hou r o f boile r steamin g capacit y each . * * , Thi s i s aggregat e capacit y o f 1 6 units . Capacity * 10 0 15 0 ! 25 0 12 0 15 0 10 0 15 0 20 0 22 0 11 0 1626* * 12 0 25 8 12 5 27 5 50 0 23 2 14 4 19 9 18 5 ./ * *

"»• • 2 . • * « t > % f * >Cas e I 24 . 25 . 26 .
27 . Unit s Capacity *

2 2 60 0

50 0 Unit s 1 2 1 2 5 1 3 Capacity * 10 0 1 9 0 60 0 40 0 50 0 60 0 60 0

Total s 2 8 Gran d Tota l 608 0 14 3 32,59 4 11 5 26,51 4 3. .

* -J. nthousand s o f pound s pe r hou r o f boile r steamin g capacit y each .