alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 163/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.163.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 163 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 541 June 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.163.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 163

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 541 June 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 163/1 | State aid — Belgium — State aid SA.23420 (11/C) (ex NN 40/10) — Presumption of illegal aid to SA Ducroire/Delcredere NV in the form of capital allocation, transfer of assets resulting from a prior guarantee, and possible internal transfers of resources towards the insurance of marketable risks — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2011/C 163/1

State aid — Belgium — State aid SA.23420 (11/C) (ex NN 40/10) — Presumption of illegal aid to SA Ducroire/Delcredere NV in the form of capital allocation, transfer of assets resulting from a prior guarantee, and possible internal transfers of resources towards the insurance of marketable risks — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27190]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 712 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-391, K2025-389.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27190 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27151]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 700 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-373, K2025-371.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27151 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
SERVED NOVEMBER 3, 2010 

DEPARTMENT OF 

•:ANSPORWION 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION .-I'CJ OPERATIONS 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC ^njQ fjQV -L| A R: 2S 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SAMUEL JOSEPH LATHAM 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10WP0009 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FAA No. FAA-2010- 0624' 

HEARING NOTICE 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

... On or before February J, 2011, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

^ including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to 

production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a 

discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution 

in a timely manner... 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and 

considered on March 11,2011, in the National Transportation Safety Board 

Courtroom, 1515 W. 190th Street. Ste 555, Gardena, CA 90248. Hearings will 

commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. Settled cases will 

not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper pleading(s). 

Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express raaiU.courier or postal service. 

jchard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

' Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases) are also available 

for viewing at http://www.resulatiom. gov. 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0009 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

• SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Samuel Joseph Latham, Respondent 

33690 Almond St. 

Wildomar, CA 92595 

TEL: 951-392-4897 

Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los ^ngeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7117 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodv^n, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation > 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. ' . > 

East Biii[l4ing Ground Floor, Room El2-320 t 

Washingtpn, DC 20590 ' *-* 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor202-366-2139 ,^.F/^,: 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

* Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the foUt):^^ address: 

Hearing Oc^'Ct, Federal Aviation Administration,r600 Indc^Mnulencie AveAQe, S.W., WiIburiK^^jfi||iiiilbig - Room 

2014, Washiiigton, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. ? *
-  Technology Development and Transfer Program 
          -  Science 
          Applied Science
Bat Conservation and Mining
Coal Combustion Residues
Dam Safety
Geomorphic Reclamation
Hydrology
Impoundments
Mine Fires
Mine Pools
Prime Farmland
Watersheds

          -  Technology 
          -  Training 

# Science

OSMRE relies on scientific advancements to inform technological development, training opportunities, and the assistance provided to stakeholders. 

OSMRE applies sound science to address public safety and environmental issues related to the mining of coal and reclamation of the lands affected after mining. Scientific and scholarly information considered in OSMRE decision making must be robust, of the highest quality, and the result of as rigorous scientific and scholarly processes as can be achieved. Most importantly, it must be trustworthy.  

The application of sound science is key to addressing complex mining problems such as water quality issues, mine subsidence, slope instability, and threatened and endangered species protection.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DAVID YARBOROUGH,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 397, 2017

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID Nos. 1202006406, 

§ 1201018253, 1402013417

§

§

§

Submitted: October 10, 2017

Decided: October 26, 2017

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

ORDER

This 26th day of October 2017, upon consideration of the notice to show cause

and the appellant’s response, it appears to the Court that:

(1) On September 28, 2017, the appellant, David Yarborough, filed a notice 

of appeal from an August 31, 2017 Superior Court order denying his motion for 

appointment of counsel and granting his motion to amend his motion for 

postconviction relief. The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice to show cause directing 

Yarborough to show why his appeal should not be dismissed based on this Court’s 

lack of jurisdiction under Article IV, § 11(1)(b) of the Delaware Constitution to hear
2

an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case. In his response to the notice to show 

cause, Yarborough argues the merits of his motion for appointment of counsel. 

(2) Under the Delaware Constitution, this Court may review only a final 

judgment in a criminal case.1 The Superior Court’s denial of Yarborough’s motion 

to appoint counsel is an interlocutory, not final, order.

2

 This Court therefore does 

not have jurisdiction to review this appeal.3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

 

1 Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b).

2

See, e.g., Harris v. State, 2013 WL 4858990, at *1 (Del. Sept. 10, 2013) (holding Superior Court 

order denying motion for appointment of counsel is an interlocutory order).

3 Gottlieb v. State, 697 A.2d 400, 401 (Del. 1997).
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E6]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     HONORING MAXWELL EMORY LANHAM

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. SAM GRAVES

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                        Tuesday, January 6, 2009

  Mr. GRAVES. Madam Speaker, I proudly pause to recognize Maxwell Emory 
Lanham of Kansas City, Missouri. Maxwell is a very special young man 
who has exemplified the finest qualities of citizenship and leadership 
by taking an active part in the Boy Scouts of America, Troop 1261, and 
earning the most prestigious award of Eagle Scout.
  Maxwell has been very active with his troop, participating in many 
Scout activities. Over the many years Maxwell has been involved with 
Scouting, he has not only earned numerous merit badges, but also the 
respect of his family, peers, and community.
  Madam Speaker, I proudly ask you to join me in commending Maxwell 
Emory Lanham for his accomplishments with the Boy Scouts of America and 
for his efforts put forth in achieving the highest distinction of Eagle 
Scout.

                          ____________________
```
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

Commission Monthly Case Activity for April 2010 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 25 

2. Cases Added to Docket 

Martorell Constr. Inc. 

No. 09-1511 

Direction for Review and Remand on 4/16/10 

Southern Pan Services Co. 

No. 08-0866 

Direction for Review on 4/18/10 

Deep South Crane & Rigging Co. 

No. 09-0240 

Direction for Review on 4/22/10 

United States Postal Service 

No. 08-1547 

Direction for Review on 4/29/10 

4 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket 

Martorell Constr. Inc. 

No. 09-1511 

Direction for Review and Remand on 4/16/10 

Burrows Paper Corp. 

No. 09-1559 

Decision issued on 4/19/10 

-2 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 27
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 4, 2009 

# Order

November 4, 2009

136956(48)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 136956 v COA: 278189 St. Joseph CC: 06-013718-FC LARRY EUGENE WILCOX, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension to October 26, 2009 of the time for filing their brief on appeal is considered and it is
GRANTED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 41 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange 
Commission relating to ``Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction 
                               Issuers''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the

              

 Securities and Exchange Commission relating to ``Disclosure of 
Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers'' (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 
49359 (July 27, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange 
Commission relating to ``Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction 
                               Issuers''.
```
Exhibit 10.10


 


	 	 	18683 Bearpath Trail




Eden Prairie, MN 55347


 


Telephone (612) 202-7026


rcohen@zomedica.com


 


Robert Cohen


Chief Executive
Officer


September 3, 2020


 


Mr. Hanjoon Ryu


General Manager


Qorvo Biotechnologies,
LLC


14205 21st Avenue North
(Suite 212)


Plymouth, MN 55447


 


Dear Hanjoon:


 


In partial fulfillment
of the final Milestone Event set forth in Section 6.1 of the Development and Supply Agreement between Qorvo Biotechnologies, LLC
("Qorvo") and Zomedica Pharmaceuticals Corp. ("Zomedica") dated November 26, 2018 (the "Original Agreement")
and amended August 14, 2020, Zomedica hereby identifies the sixth and seventh assays to be developed pursuant to Section 3.4 of
the Original Agreement as follows:


  


	Assay #6:	 	Canine Pancreatic Lipase (cPL) - Pancreatic Biomarker
	Species:	 	Canine
	Matrix:	 	Serum
	 	 	 
	Assay #7:	 	Cobalamin (Vitamin B12) - Distal Small Intestine Biomarker
	Species:	 	Canine
	Matrix:	 	Serum




 


In addition, we have
identified the eighth assay to be developed with Assay #6 and Assay #7 above in order to comprise a complete gastrointestinal panel:


 


	Assay #8:	 	Folate (Vitamin B9) - Proximal Small Intestine Biomarker
	Species:	 	Canine
	Matrix:	 	Serum




 


If you are in agreement
with the above, kindly sign and return this document to me. We then will forward the $2 million milestone payment promptly.


 


Best regards,


 


/s/ Robert Cohen


 


Robert Cohen


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED
BY:


 


Qorvo Biotechnologies,
LLC


 


	Signature:	 	/s/ Hanjoon Ryu	 
	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	Hanjoon Ryu	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date:	 	September 4, 2020
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 91867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27113]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12581]

 Notice of Charter Renewal for the Advisory Committee on 
Historical Diplomatic Documentation

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation 
has renewed its charter for a period of two years.

DATES: The Charter was renewed on October 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning the Committee, 
and the renewal of its Charter should be directed to Adam M. Howard, 
Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic 
Documentation, Department of State, Office of the Historian, 2300 E 
Street NW, Washington, DC 20372 (Navy Potomac Annex), telephone (202) 
955-0214; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee consists of nine members drawn 
from among historians, political scientists, archivists, international 
lawyers, and other social scientists who are distinguished in the field 
of U.S. foreign relations. This Advisory Committee will continue to 
make recommendations to the Historian and the Department of State on 
all aspects of the Department's program to publish the Foreign 
Relations of the United States series as well as on the Department's 
responsibility under statute (22 U.S.C. 4351, et seq.) to open its 25-
year-old and older records for public review at the National Archives 
and Records Administration.

Adam M. Howard,
Executive Secretary, Office of the Historian, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-27113 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-34-P
```
EXHIBIT
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the period ending August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen C. Donnelly, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Stephen C. DonnellyStephen
                C. DonnellyChief
                Financial OfficerDecember
                1, 2008
#### CHAS. R. BREWER and wife HETTIE v. THOMAS A. HARVY.

To make a gift valid to pass title, there must be a *delivery,*either actual or symbolical.

Therefore, where a father pointed out a colt to his daughter, at the same time saying to her, “that is your property; I give it to you,” hut retains the possession, no title passed to the daughter.

This was a Civil Action, to recover the possession of a certain horse and for damages, tried before Seymour, </., at Fall Term, 1874, of the Superior Court of Chaven county.

On the trial below, it appeared that one White, who was the father of *the feme*plaintiff, during his lifetime, gave to her the horse in controversy. That at the time of this gift, the *feme*plaintiff was only twelve years old, and the horse itself nothing but a colt. The manner of the gift seemed to be this: *177The father, White, standing in the piazza of his honse, in company with the *feme*plaintiff and her mother, pointed out the colt, at the time standing with its mother near by, and told her that it was her property: “ I give it to yon.”" That the colt was ever afterwards known as her property, by the family and by the neighbors. When her father died, the colt was one or two years old, and had never been out of her father’s actual possession. That she, th *a feme*plaintifl, lived with her father until his death, and with her mother and one Adams, whom her mother subsequently married, at the same place, till Adams carried the said horse away. That her father while he' lived, and her mother afterwards, took care of the-horse for her and as her property, until it was sold in A ugnst, 1873, by said Adams and wife to the defendant Harvy, while the *feme*plaintiff was away in November. *'*

There has been no administration on White’s estate, and the property belonging thereto, remains in charge of her mother, upon the place her father died. She, th *% feme*plaintiff, has since intermarried with the other plain tiff, and is nineteen years old.

"Upon this statement of facts, the Court intimating the opinion, that the plaintiffs could not recover, on the ground, that there had been no sufficient delivery in law, and plaintiffs could not maintain this action for want of title, plaintiffs submitted to a non-suit and appealed.

*N. R. Bryan,*for appellants.

*Ciarle <& Roberts*and *Fair cloth (& Granger,*contra.

Reade, J.

A gift is, of course, without valuable consideration ; and to make it valid to pass title, there must be a *delivery,*either actual or symbolical.

In this case, the owner pointed out a colt, and said to his daughter, ” that is your property ; I give it to you.” There was no change of possession. The title did not pass to the daughter.

There is no error.

Peb Cueiam. Judgment affirmed-»
# Official Journal L 20/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.020.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 20 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5422 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.020.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 20

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5422 January 2011

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | 2011/16/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2010 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

2011/16/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2010

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euros unless otherwise indicated.Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.