alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chie f Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-2080

___________ Michael DeJuan McCroy, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Douglas County Corrections * Center; Jeffery Newton, Director; * [UNPUBLISHED] Walker, Sgt.; Heatley, Chaplain; * Cortese, C.O., * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 14, 2010 Filed: September 16, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Michael McCroy, an inmate at th e Douglas County Corrections Center (DCCC), appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in wh ich he claimed that his constitutional rights were violated because he was unable to practice his faith for two weeks.-2- McCroy, a Muslim, alleged in his comp laint that, during a search for extra unauthorized linens, DCCC officers confiscated a towel he used as a prayer rug, and a copy of the Koran, both of which he had permission to use in order to practice his faith; and that the items were not returned to him until tw o weeks later, after he had filed a grievance and his grievance had been investigated.
Upon careful de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro , 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (review standardfor § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal); Moore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (review standard for § 1915A dismissal), we agree with the district court that McCroy failed to state a claim, because he effectively sued only Douglas County, ye t he did not allege that his rights were violated as a result of any policy or custom of Douglas County. See Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp. , 172 F.3d 531, 535-36 (8th Cir. 1999) (because § 1983 liability exposes public servants to civ il liability and damages, plaintiffs must expressly and unambiguously state capacity in which defendants are being sued; absent such express statement, suit is cons trued as being against defendants in their official capacity; claims against public empl oyees in their offici al capacity are merely claims against their public employer; public employer cannot be liable for employees’ unconstitutional actions unless actions are result of official policy or custom of employer). We also conclude that ne ither the initial confiscation of McCroy’s religious items, nor the two-weekdelay in returning them to him, rose to the level of a constitutional violation. See Patel v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons , 515 F.3d 807, 813 (8th Cir. 2008) (First Amendment free-exercise claim requires showing of substantial burden on ability to practice one ’s religion); Mark v. Nix , 983 F.2d 138, 139 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (confiscation of inmate’s religious item and denial of related grievance did not violate inmate’s c onstitutional rights where confiscation was reasonably related to legitimate penological interests).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H24]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Clerk of the House of Representatives:

                                              Office of the Clerk,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                  Washington, DC, January 6, 2009.
     Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
     Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Madam Speaker: Under clause 2(g) of rule II of the 
     Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, I herewith 
     designate Ms. Deborah M. Spriggs, Deputy Clerk and Mr. Robert 
     F. Reeves, Deputy Clerk, to sign any and all papers and do 
     all other acts for me under the name of the Clerk of the 
     House which they would be authorized to do by virtue of this 
     designation, except such as are provided by statute, in case 
     of my temporary absence or disability.
       This designation shall remain in effect for the 111th 
     Congress or until modified by me.
       With best wishes, I am
           Sincerely,
                                               Lorraine C. Miller,
     Clerk of the House.

                          ____________________
```
Determining MCES’ Metro politan WWTP Influent Mercury Loading

Metropolitan Council Environmental Services

Minneapolis

– St. Paul, Minnesota Metropolitan Area

The following is a description of the influent monitoring method employed by MCES to

measure the quantity of mercury entering its largest WWTP, for the purpose of evaluating

the effectiveness of MCES’ amalgam separator installation program with dental clinics.

 Mercury in grit not significant

Two samples collected in November 2002

Samples dried, siz e separated, and analyzed

Average loading ~ 2 gm/day

 Influent sampling

Dedicated, refrigerated, composite sampler

Sample from well mixed section of east primary influent channel

Sample contacts T eflon lined tubing and silicon pump tubing

Flow composite sam ple collected in tarred, polyprop y lene bottle

Sample volume approximately 1200

– 1500 ml

 Entire sample digested in sample bottle

Sample weight determined

Appropriate amounts of potassium permanganate, potassium peroxydisulfate,

sulfuric acid, and nitric ac id added

Heated in 95 o C oven for 6 hours

 Analysis via cold vapor atomic fluorescence with dual

- trap gold amalgamation

Replicate analysis conducted on each digested sample

 Sampling schedule

24 hour composite starting at ~ 0700

14 consecutive days per sampli ng event

(for some events, extra samples were taken)

file: MCES Metro WWTP Mercury Influent Monitoring Method, 9

- 2003
# Official Journal C 127A/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 127A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 508 June 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 127A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 508 June 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 127A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fourth supplement to the 25th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 127A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fourth supplement to the 25th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/11 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 11 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Fellowships: Oncology.                    

*Date:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nywana Sizemore, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6189, MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-408-9916,                         *sizemoren@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 18, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-27364 Filed 11-21-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7196

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

APRIL NICOLE GARRETT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (7:07-cr-01463-HMH-1; 7:12-cv-00966-HMH)

Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

April Nicole Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

April Nicole Garrett seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2012) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on April 12, 2012. The notice of appeal was filed, at the 

earliest, on July 11, 2012. Because Garrett failed to file a 

timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening 

of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### W. D. Ellis, plaintiff in error, *vs.*W. G. Drake, defendant in error.

The defendant gave the plaintiff a note for an amount claimed by the latter to be due for board. This note was paid off. The plaintiff subsequently sued the defendant on an account, to which the general-issue alone was pleaded. The defendant claimed upon the trial that the mote was given for too much, and that he so stated to the plaintiff at the time of its execution, but nevertheless signed it “to keep down a fuss.” He claimed a credit for the excess:

Held, that no matters in evidence anterior to the date of the note could be considered by the jury.

Promissory notes. Evidence. Before Judge Cowart. City Court of Atlanta. December Term, 1873.

For the facts of this case, see the decision.

Hillyer *&*Brother, for plaintiff in error.

•Collier & Collier, for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant on an •account for $530 50, for board. It appears from the evidence in the record, that the defendant and his family had *618been boarding with the plaintiff for a long time. In April,, 1872, the parties had a settlement and the defendant gave to-the plaintiff his note due at sixty days after date, for the sum-of $844 60. The defendant continued to board with plaintiff and made him sundry payments in money at different times, without giving any instructions as to how the payments should be applied. The plaintiff credited the payments on the note until it was paid off. Interest was counted in the note at the rate of one and one half per cent, per month. The defendant filed no othor plea but the general issue. The defendant stated in his evidence that the note which had been paid off, was given for too much, that the plaintiff counted the board up to that time at $105 00 per month, that he demurred to it at the time, but the plaintiff was irritable and he signed the note to keep down a fuss,, but the note was for more than was due. The defendant testified as to the price of board in the city of Atlanta. The jury, under the charge of the court, found a verdict for the plaintiff. The court charged the jury that the defendant was concluded and could not go behind the date of the note, and that no matters in evidence anterior to the date of the note-could be considered by the jury; to which charge, the defendant excepted.

In view of the evidence and pleadings contained in the record, there was no error in the charge of the court to the jury. The defendant had given his note to the plaintiff for the amount claimed by him to be due for board up to the-time of the date thereof, and had paid it. It was too late after the note had been given and paid, for the defendant to go behind it and say that the note was given for more than was actually due for board anterior to the date thereof ; that contract had been fully executed and performed by the defendant. As the plaintiff received a pretty high rate of interest on the note, we do not award damages in this case.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the registrant certify, to the best of their knowledge, that the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.  Date: September 13, 2009  American International Group, Inc.   /s/ Steven Davis Steven Davis Chief Executive Officer   /s/ Myron Goldstein Myron Goldstein Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 263/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 263 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6311 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 263

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6311 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 263/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9812 – Verily Life Sciences/Santen Pharmaceutical/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2020/C 263/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9889 – ERGO/SDHS/Taishan Property & Casualty Insurance) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 263/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9812 – Verily Life Sciences/Santen Pharmaceutical/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2020/C 263/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9889 – ERGO/SDHS/Taishan Property & Casualty Insurance) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 263/03 | Euro exchange rates — 10 August 2020 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 263/03

Euro exchange rates — 10 August 2020

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 263/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9891 – Hayfin Capital Management/Frans Bonhomme Group) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 263/05 | Publication of an application for approval of non-minor amendments to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 263/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9891 – Hayfin Capital Management/Frans Bonhomme Group) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 263/05

Publication of an application for approval of non-minor amendments to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 12


                      CENTRAL TRACTOR FARM & COUNTRY, INC.
      SCHEDULE REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                 (in thousands)


                                                   Three months ended
                                            --------------------------------
                                             January 30,        January 31,
                                                1999               1998
                                                ----               ----



Income before income taxes                    $ 2,954             $ 1,375
                                              =======             =======

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                              4,959               5,284
  Portion of rent expense                                                 
    representing interest                         715                 756
                                              -------             -------
 Total fixed charges                            5,674               6,040
                                              =======             =======


Earnings before income                                                    
  taxes and fixed charges                       8,628               7,415
                                              =======             =======


Ratio of earnings to fixed                     1.5 x               1.2 x
charges                                       =======             =======
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S31]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             ENROLLED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTION PRESENTED

  The Secretary of the Senate reported that on December 12, 2008, she 
had presented to the President of the United States the following 
enrolled bills and joint resolution:

       S. 3663. An act to require the Federal Communications 
     Commission to provide for a short-term extension of the 
     analog television broadcasting authority so that essential 
     public safety announcements and digital television transition 
     information may be provided for a short time during the 
     transition to digital television broadcasting.
       S. 3712. An act to make a technical correction in the Paul 
     Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 
     Addiction Equity Act of 2008.
       S.J. Res. 46. Joint resolution ensuring that the 
     compensation and other emoluments attached to the office of 
     Secretary of State are those which were in effect on January 
     1, 2007.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2021254EN.01000601.xml

| 29.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/6

---

Notice from the Government of Denmark pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products

(2021/C 254/06)

In accordance with Article 9(4) of the above Directive, Denmark hereby notifies its undertaking to maintain specific stocks.

| 1. | The level of the specific stocks that Denmark undertakes to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The level of the specific stocks that Denmark undertakes to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption.

| 2. | The undertaking applies to the period from 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The undertaking applies to the period from 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022.

| 3. | The specific stocks will be composed of the following product categories:






  — | Motor gasoline |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

The specific stocks will be composed of the following product categories:

—

Motor gasoline

| — | Gas/diesel oil |
| --- | --- |

—

Gas/diesel oil

| 4. | The stocks will be owned and held by the central Danish stockholding entity, Foreningen Danske Olieberedskabslagre (FDO). |
| --- | --- |

4.

The stocks will be owned and held by the central Danish stockholding entity, Foreningen Danske Olieberedskabslagre (FDO).

---