alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on February 29, 2020

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 14-1688

Science Applications 

International Corp., 

d/b/a SAIC

06/23/16 DFR 10/31/16 Closed

2 15-1121 Clean Fuels of 

Indiana, Inc. 06/30/16 DFR 11/09/16 Closed

3 14-1268 Dover High 

Performance Plastics 07/19/16 DFR 11/01/16 Closed

4 15-1347 Gate Precast Co. 11/10/16 DFR 12/05/16 Closed

5 16-1533

Cooper/T. Smith 

Corporation, d/b/a 

Blakeley Boatworks, 

Inc.

04/27/17 DFR 04/27/17 Closed

6 16-0803

The Lane 

Construction 

Corporation

05/23/17 DFR 09/14/17 Closed

7 16-1167 Aerospace Testing 

Alliance 08/22/17 DFR 11/20/17 Closed

8 15-1069 Healy Tibbitts 

Builders, Inc. 10/27/17 DFR 11/13/17 Closed

9 16-0940 Angel Brothers 

Enterprises, Ltd. 11/17/17 DFR 12/15/17 Closed

10 17-0190 Shelly & Sands, Inc. 05/02/18 DFR 05/10/18 Closed

11 15-1574

MasTec North 

America dba MasTec 

Advanced 

Technologies, Inc.

06/20/18 DFR 07/10/18 Closed

12 17-0949 Walmart, Inc. 07/12/18 DFR 08/09/18 Closed

13 16-1587 TNT Crane & Rigging, 

Inc. 10/16/18 DFR 10/30/18 Closed

14 17-1214 Mansfield Industrial, 

Inc. 11/23/18 DFR 01/03/19 Closed

15 17-0483 Ceco Concrete 

Construction, LLC 11/28/18 DFR 12/19/18 Closed

16 16-1628 Schaad Detective 

Agency, Inc. 12/18/18 DFR 01/07/19 Closed

17 17-1174 Wayne Farms, LLC 03/01/19 DFR 03/21/19 Closed

18 17-2144 Tampa Electric Co. 04/09/19 DFR 04/23/19 Closed

19 18-0034

Armstrong Utilities, 

Inc. d/b/a Armstrong 

Cable Services

10/15/19 DFR 10/24/19 Open

20 17-0138 Home Rubber 

Company, LP 10/22/19 DFR 11/04/19 Open

21 18-0970 FreightCar America, 

Inc. 10/28/19 DFR 11/04/19 Closed
Page 2 of 2

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on February 29, 2020

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

22 18-0758 RoadSafe Traffic 

Systems, Inc. 10/30/19 DFR 11/01/19 Closed

23 09-0901 Seward Ship’s 

Drydock, Inc. 11/04/19 REM

24 17-1894 Maxim Crane Works 02/06/20 DFR 02/14/20 Open

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Oscar Taylor and Denise Taylor v. Adrienne A. Henny and Damon K. 

Henny

Appellate case number: 01-14-00650-CV

Trial court case number: 2008-40075

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

Appellants, Oscar D. Taylor and Denise Taylor, filed a “Motion to Abate or, In the 

Alternative, Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal.” We deny the request to 

abate this appeal, but grant appellants’ alternative request to extend the time for filing their 

notice of appeal to August 4, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 28, 2014
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51051 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. JUAN ARTURO DOROTEO-SOLANO Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-715-ALL Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Arturo Doroteo-Solano raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D March 5, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51051

2 The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND> 
 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations 
filed as part of the quarterly report on form 10-QSB and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such report on form 10-QSB. 
 
</LEGEND> 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                               0 
<SECURITIES>                                     33539 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    33539 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 38353 
<PP&E>                                         3106172 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  334093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1986360 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2889809 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                          4694 
<OTHER-SE>                                     2252274 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1986360 
<SALES>                                          24684 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 24684 
<CGS>                                            78682 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   107405 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   187 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 907 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (83815) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (83815) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   (83815) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02) 
         

</TABLE>
## Job Safety Commission to Consider Issues of Employee Exposure and 'Significant Risk' in Machine Guarding Case

 

 

 

 

**JOB SAFETY COMMISSION TO CONSIDER ISSUES OF EMPLOYEE EXPOSURE AND `SIGNIFICANT RISK' IN MACHINE GUARDING CASE**

The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission will hear argument on the issue of  whether employers have an obligation to protect employees from injury by guarding machine parts that the employees would not come into contact with in the normal course of their work. In the case to be argued the Secretary of Labor contends that employees could injure their hands under the plungers of electrically powered presses but  the judge found that the potential for employee contact was too `speculative' to warrant the finding of a violation. Oral argument will be held at 10 a.m., October 9, 1997 at the Review Commission's headquarters, 1120 20th St., N.W., Ninth Floor South, Room 965, Washington, D.C.

The parties will debate the following questions: 1) whether the Commission must defer to the Secretary's interpretation of the cited standard; 2) whether the Secretary must show the existence of a significant risk of harm; and 3) whether the Secretary established the existence of a hazard and employee exposure to a hazard under the generally worded standard. Commission precedent on these questions and Supreme Court  precedent, concerning when the Commission must defer to the Secretary's interpretation of OSHA standards will be discussed. E.g., Martin v. OSHRC (CF&I Steel Corp.), 499 U.S. 144 (1991).

Commission Chairman Stuart E. Weisberg and Commissioner Daniel Guttman will hear the arguments. The case involves  Fabricated Metal Products, Inc. (FMP), a maker of small metal parts such as fuel filters and copper cones for ammunition.  OSHA inspected FMP's Naugatuck, Connecticut  worksite in 1993 and cited the company for violations of  machine guarding requirements for its electrically powered presses.   FMP contested the citations. Following a hearing, a Review Commission judge vacated the charges at issue which concern the machines' points of operation and rotating horizontal shafts.  The Secretary sought review of the judge's decision and FMP requested oral argument.

Arguments will be presented by counsel for the Secretary of Labor and counsel for FMP. OSHRC is an independent federal agency created to issue decisions in disputes arising from inspections conducted by OSHA which is part of the U.S. Department of Labor. OSHRC has two adjudication levels.  Administrative Law Judges hear cases and issue decisions that may be reviewed by three presidentially- appointed Commissioners. The Commission generally holds oral arguments only in cases that present significant, complex or novel legal issues.
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket No. 17-0737 

UHS OF WESTWOOD PEMBROKE, INC., UHS 

OF DELAWARE, INC.,

Respondents. 

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief the following issues presented in the petitions for 

discretionary review: 

(1) Whether the judge erred in finding that Respondents were not a “single entity.” 

(2) Whether the judge erred in finding that the Secretary established a feasible and 

effective means of abatement. 

(3) Whether the judge erred in recharacterizing the violation from “repeat” to 

“serious.” See Angelica Textile Servs., Inc., 27 BNA OSHC 1246, 1254-59 (No. 

08-1774, 2018), appeal filed, No. 18-2831, (2d Cir. Sept. 21, 2018). 

The parties are advised that, when a case is directed for review to consider either the merits 

or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1

 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission 

in accordance with Commission Rule 93. The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed 

in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service.

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: March 25, 2020 _/s/_______________________________ 

 John X. Cerveny 

 Executive Secretary

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, 

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. 

Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Research conducted by: Betty S. Chambers Page 1 of 1

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 44

May 3, 1985

Larry Grasch, Deputy Commissioner

Department for Surface Mining Reclamation & Enforcement 

6th Floor, Capital Plaza Tower 

Frankfort, Kentucky 40601

TOPIC: STATES' "BOND POOL" SYSTEM AND COAL EXPLORATION REQUIREMENTS

INQUIRY: Statutes or regulatory data on states' bond pool system and identification of state 

programs that include coal exploration requirements.

SEARCH RESULTS:

Part one of the inquiry is addressed in COALEX COMPARISON REPORT - 37, which is 

enclosed. A COALEX search was conducted to locate those states that have coal exploration 

requirements. Several states were identified and a 'kwic excerpt' for those states are included in 

this Report.

The attached include states as follows: Pennsylvania, Virginia, Alabama, Mississippi, Illinois, 

Ohio, Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, Alaska, Colorado, New Mexico, North Dakota, 

Wyoming, Kansas, Iowa.

ATTACHMENTS:

A. COALEX COMPARISON REPORT - 37.

B. Short excerpts of state regulations referencing coal exploration.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                         3,557
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         796
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               16,162
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         87,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           83,337
<LOANS>                                        251,876
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 373,008
<DEPOSITS>                                     258,365
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            19,691
<LONG-TERM>                                    60,330
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,891
<OTHER-SE>                                     30,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 373,008
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                11,676
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,951
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               287
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               14,914
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             6,313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,964
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,950
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  245
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,664
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,027
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (206)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   821
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 2.28
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,493
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,738
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,738
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                       637
<INVENTORY>                                     55,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,432
<PP&E>                                          90,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,949
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,137
<BONDS>                                            441
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            94
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,962
<SALES>                                         72,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,881
<CGS>                                           54,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    19
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,506
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,506
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 447 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 90331)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-348, K2025-346.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26612 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Raul Alarcon, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spanish Broadcasting
System, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  August 9, 2004



                                   /s/   Raul Alarcon, Jr.
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Raul Alarcon, Jr.
                                   Title: Chairman of the Board of  Directors,
                                          Chief Executive Officer and President