alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


1.   The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
     Officer of AmeriVest Properties Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to
     18 U.S.C.ss.1350 (ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). This
     Certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB of AmeriVest Properties Inc. for
     the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

2.   We certify that such Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
     information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AmeriVest
     Properties Inc.

November 13, 2002
                                              By: /s/ William T. Atkins
                                              -------------------------
                                              William T. Atkins
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                                              By: /s/ D. Scott Ikenberry
                                              --------------------------
                                              D. Scott Ikenberry
                                              Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, the President and ChiefExecutive Officer of American Science & Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

1.                the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006 (“10-K”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Company’s 10-K being filed fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation ofthe Company
| Date: June 9, 2006 |                                     |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                    | /s/  ANTHONY R. FABIANO                  |
|                    | Anthony R.  Fabiano                      |
|                    | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to American Science &Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by American Science &Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for March 2021 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 21 

2. Cases Added to Docket 0 

 

3. Cases Subtracted from Docket -4 

MasTec North America dba MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.

No. 15-1574

Decision issued on March 2, 2021

FreightCar America, Inc.

No. 18-0970

Decision issued on March 3, 2021

StormForce of Jacksonville, LLC

No. 19-0593

Decision issued March 8, 2021

Tampa Electric Company

No. 17-2144

Decision issued March 19, 2021

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 17
----

**EXHIBIT      32.3**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                               |

----
Summary Statement

In summary, Phantom 3 seeks an exemption from the FARs set forth above and in 

Appendix A to allow commercial operations of a small unmanned vehicle conducting 

aerial video/photographs of residential property. Approval of the exemption allowing 

commercial operations of the DJI Phantom 3 for aerial video/photographs will enhance 

safety by reducing risk. Conventional aerial video/photography operations, using 

conventional aircraft, present risks associated with vehicles that weigh several thousand 

pounds, carry large quantities of fuel and passengers. Such aircraft must fly to and from 

the work location. In contrast, a DJI Phantom 3, weighing less than 3 lbs and powered by 

batteries, eliminates a portion of that risk given the reduced mass and lack of 

combustible fuel carried on board. The Phantom 3 is carried to the survey location, not 

flown there. The Phantom 3 will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not 

expose any individuals to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights. Additionally, 

no national security issue is raised by the grant of the requested exemptions. Given the 

size, load carrying capacity, speed at which it operates, and the fact that it carries no 

explosives or other dangerous materials, the Phantom 3 poses no threat to national 

security. The operation of the Phantom 3 , weighing less than 3 lbs, for aerial 

video/photography in accordance with the strict conditions outlined above, will provide 

an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein, 

including exempting Carroll Engineers PLLC from the requirements of Part 21.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,420<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,695<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          69,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         53,622<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,461)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,428
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,986
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,054<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,074
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    858
<INCOME-TAX>                                       338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                580<F5>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       580
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
<FN>
<F1>Includes restricted cash of $578,000
<F2>Includes notes receivable of $1.1 million.
<F3>Net of bond discount of $1.021 million.
<F4>Excluding financial expenses, disclosed below.
<F5>Net of minority interests in losses of $60,462.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Leutermann, Receiver, Respondent, vs. Aschermann and others, Appellants.

*October 4*

October *24, 1916.*

*Fraudulent conveyances: Purchase of exempt property: Intent: Notice.*

1. A debtor may, in good faith, purchase a homestead with nonexempt money or property.

2.- Even if such a purchase be made with the intention of defeating creditors, the transaction cannot, under sec. 2324, Stats., be set aside unless it be shown that the other party thereto had notice of or participated in such fraudulent intent.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: J. 0. Ludwig, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

The case is this: A receiver appointed in supplementary proceedings brings the action to set aside, because fraudulent as to creditors, a transfer of a $5,000 legacy made by the judgment debtor to one of the defendants in consideration of a conveyance of certain real estate which .the debtor immediately made his homestead. There was no proof that the as-signee of the legacy had any knowledge that the judgment debtor was indebted, and no evidence that she participated in any way in the fraudulent intent of the debtor, if in fact he had one. The trial court set aside the transfer on the ground apparently that, because the conversion of nonexempt property into exempt property must hinder creditors in the collection of their debts, the transfer was necessarily fraudulent, regardless of the intent of the other party to the transaction. The defendants appeal.

Eor the appellants there was a brief by *Flanders, Bottum, Fawsetl & Botium,*attorneys, and IF. *L. Gold,*of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. F. L. McNamara*and *Mr. Gold.*

*F. P. Hopkins,*for the respondent.

WiNsnow, C. J.

The judgment must be reversed because : *First,*a man may, in good faith, purchase a homestead *163and use uonexempt property or money for that purpose even although he be indebted at the time. *Scofield v.*Hopkins, 61 Wis. *370,*21 N. W. 259; *Scott v. Holman,*117 Wis. 206, 94 N. W. 30. Second, even if he makes the purchase with the intention of defeating his creditors, the transaction cannot be set aside unless it is shown that the other party had notice of or participated in the fraudulent intent of the debtor. Sec. 2324, Stats.

The case of *Comstock v. Bechtel,*63 Wis. 656, 24 N. W. 465, when properly read does not lay down any contrary doctrine.

*By the Gourt.*— Judgment reversed, and action remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 25, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00824

- CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF GEORGE V. GARCIA, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON,

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015PB6000016 L 2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant’s First Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant ’ s Amended Brief is

hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of May, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92682-92683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27366]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-12392-01-R5]

Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Order on Petition for 
Objection to State Operating Permit for Warrick Newco LLC

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

[[Page 92683]]

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an Order dated October 9, 2024, denying a petition dated July 9, 2024, 
from Sierra Club. The petition requested that the EPA object to a Clean 
Air Act (CAA) title V operating permit issued by the Indiana Department 
of Environmental Management (IDEM) to Warrick Newco LLC for its 
aluminum production plant located in Newburgh, Warrick County, Indiana.

ADDRESSES: The final order, the petition, and other supporting 
information are available for public inspection during normal business 
hours at the following address: Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend that 
you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section before visiting the Region 5 office. Additionally, the 
final order and petitions are available electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Priyanka Painuly, Air and Radiation 
Division (AR 18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-7569, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA received a petition from the Sierra Club 
dated July 9, 2024, requesting that EPA object to the issuance of 
operating permit no. T173-46378-00007, issued by IDEM to Warrick Newco 
LLC for its aluminum production plant located in Newburgh, Warrick 
County, Indiana. On October 9, 2024, the EPA Administrator issued an 
Order denying the petition. The order explains the basis for EPA's 
decision.
    Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner 
may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny 
issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later 
than January 21, 2025.
    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: November 18, 2024.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2024-27366 Filed 11-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Mymetics Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 11, 2008               /s/ Christian Rochet
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 11, 2008               /s/ Ernst Luebke
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Principal Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
is not being filed as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
unaudited  consolidated  balance sheet of AT&T Corp. at March 31, 1998,  and the
unaudited  consolidated  statement  of income for the  three-month  period ended
March 31, 1998,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         328
<SECURITIES>                                   245
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,020
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,215
<PP&E>                                         46,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                 23,084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 59,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,844
<BONDS>                                        7,342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,683
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   59,467
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,831
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               362
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             80
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                   745
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,285
<DISCONTINUED>                                 10
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,295
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.48


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the period ending August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dinesh R. Desai, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Dinesh
              R.
              DesaiDinesh
              R. DesaiChief
              Executive
              OfficerNovember 29,
              2007
#### JOHN C. GAY *v.*R. S. NASH.

*Crop Lien*— Registration.

A crop[lier¡. to secure agricultural advances (executed Under Bat. Rev. <ch. 65, || 19, SO) is valid *inter partes,*althoughtnoCregistered within ['thirty days as required hy the statute.

PROCEEDING to enforce a Lien for Advances for Agricultural Purposes commenced by affidavit before the Clerk and lieard upon issue joined at Fall Term, 1877, of Richmond Superior Co,urt, before *Seymour, J.*

Upon the trial it appeáred that the parties had entered into a written contract in which the plaintiff, merchant, agreed to furnish supplies to the amount of $700 to the defendant, planter, to enable him to cultivate a crop, in con-¡¿deration of which, the defendant agreed to deliver to the plaintiff so much of the cotton, &c., as might be sufficient *101to pay said sum. The contract wa? executed January 14tlr., 1876, admitted to probate February 14oh, and registered. February 17th, thereafter. And Ilis*Honor dismissed the-proceeding upon the ground that the contract was not registered within 30 daj^s. Judgment in favor of defendant for costs. Appeal by plaintiff.

*Messrs. T. P. Deeereux*and *J. W. Hinsdale,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. 1. 8. Ashe*and *Battle Murdesai,*for defendant..

Reade, J.

The statute provides that a written lien upon a crop, for advances of means to make the crop, shall have preference of other liens, &?. And such written liens are required to be registered within 30 days. Bat. Rev. ch. 65. § § 19, 20. In this case the written lien was not registered within 30 days. That fact w'ould certainly make it void as to third persons; but the question here is, whether it is good as between the parties ?

We are of the opinion that it is good *inter partes.*

The object of registration is to give notice. The parties have notice without registration.

There is error.

Per Curian.. Judgment rcveised.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 92023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27438]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 89 , No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2024 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 92023]]

                Memorandum of November 1, 2024

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 614(a)(1) 
                of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 621 of the Foreign 
                Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the 
                Secretary of State the authority under section 
                614(a)(1) of the FAA to determine whether it is 
                important to the security interests of the United 
                States to furnish up to $76 million in assistance to 
                Ukraine without regard to any provision of law within 
                the purview of section 614(a)(1) of the FAA.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, November 1, 2024

[FR Doc. 2024-27438
Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
```