alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1041 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the refundable portion 

of the child tax credit to individuals who are not authorized to be 

employed in the United States and to terminate the use of certifying 

acceptance agents to facilitate the application process for ITINs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2017 

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the 

refundable portion of the child tax credit to individuals 

who are not authorized to be employed in the United 

States and to terminate the use of certifying acceptance 

agents to facilitate the application process for ITINs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Handouts to Un5 authorized Taxpayers Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘SHUT Act 

6 of 2017’’. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1041 IH

1 SEC. 2. DENIAL OF REFUNDABLE PORTION OF CHILD TAX 

2 CREDIT TO INDIVIDUALS NOT AUTHORIZED 

3 TO BE EMPLOYED IN THE UNITED STATES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 24 of the 

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting 

6 after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(3) IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT WITH RE8 SPECT TO TAXPAYER.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) shall 

10 not apply to any taxpayer for any taxable year 

11 unless the taxpayer includes the taxpayer’s so12 cial security number on the return of tax for 

13 such taxable year or otherwise demonstrates on 

14 the return that the taxpayer is authorized to be 

15 employed in the United States. 

16 ‘‘(B) JOINT RETURNS.—In the case of a 

17 joint return, the requirement of subparagraph 

18 (A) shall be treated as met if either spouse 

19 meets such requirement. 

20 ‘‘(C) OMISSION TREATED AS MATHE21 MATICAL OR CLERICAL ERROR.—Any failure to 

22 meet the requirement of subparagraph (A) shall 

23 be treated as a mathematical or clerical error 

24 and assessed according to section 6213(b)(1).’’. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 1041 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

4 SEC. 3. TERMINATION OF CERTIFYING AGENT PROGRAM. 

5 Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

6 no Individual Taxpayer Identification Number may be 

7 issued by the Secretary of the Treasury (or any delegate 

8 of such Secretary) unless the supporting documentary evi9 dence is submitted to such Secretary or any delegate of 

10 such Secretary who is an employee within the Department 

11 of the Treasury. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 100 

The People &c.,

 Respondent,

 v.

Anthony Parson, Jr.,

 Appellant.

Deborah K. Jessey, for appellant.

Ashley R. Lowry, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted, upon his guilty plea, of

criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree after the

- 1 -
- 2 - No. 100

hearing court denied his motion to suppress the loaded firearm

that was seized from the rear floor of the car he was driving. 

The charge stemmed from a traffic stop resulting in the search of

the car. Defendant claims that he was denied effective

assistance of counsel based upon counsel's performance in the

litigation of the suppression motion. The record does not

support defendant's contention.

In a plea context, where, as here, the voluntariness of

the guilty plea is not in dispute, "the defendant 'must show that

there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors,

he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going

to trial,'" or that the outcome of the proceedings would have

been different (People v Hernandez, 22 NY3d 972, 975 [2013],

quoting Hill v Lockhart, 474 US 52, 59 [1985]). On this record,

it is evident that defendant's motion to suppress the gun that

was recovered during defendant's encounter with the police, if

granted, would have resulted in the dismissal of the indictment. 

When viewed in its totality, the attorney's performance

in this case throughout the proceedings, including at the

suppression hearing, did not deprive defendant of "meaningful

representation" (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). To

find otherwise on this record necessitates engaging in the exact

form of hindsight review that this Court has cautioned against in

analyzing ineffective assistance of counsel claims. In

determining whether a defendant received meaningful

- 2 -
- 3 - No. 100

representation, "counsel's efforts should not be second-guessed

with the clarity of hindsight to determine how the defense might

have been more effective" (People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712

[1998]). 

The record demonstrates that defense counsel conducted

a competent cross-examination of the witnesses at the suppression

hearing and provided the court with cogent legal arguments to

support his motion to suppress the gun. This Court will not

engage in the supposition and conjecture required to evaluate

defendant's criticism of the scope of counsel's cross-examination

at the suppression hearing. We have examined defendant's other

criticisms of counsel's performance and conclude that they are

without merit. 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges

Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Garcia concur. Judge

Fahey took no part.

Decided June 14, 2016

- 3 -
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 73 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection relating to prepaid accounts under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and the Truth in Lending Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2017 

Mr. WILLIAMS (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. 

MCHENRY, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. POSEY, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. 

HUIZENGA, Mr. DUFFY, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. ROSS, Mr. 

PITTENGER, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. BARR, Mr. ROTHFUS, Mr. MESSER, Mr. 

TIPTON, Mr. HOLLINGSWORTH, Mr. POLIQUIN, Mr. HENSARLING, Mrs. 

LOVE, Mr. HILL, Mr. EMMER, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. TROTT, Mr. 

LOUDERMILK, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Mr. MACARTHUR, Mr. DAVIDSON, Mr. BUDD, Mr. KUSTOFF of Tennessee, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. 

ROYCE of California, and Mr. GRAVES of Georgia) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 

Services 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 

to prepaid accounts under the Electronic Fund Transfer 

Act and the Truth in Lending Act. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the BuVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:17 Feb 15, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ73.IH HJ73

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 73 IH 

1 reau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to prepaid 

2 accounts under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 

3 U.S.C. 1693 et seq.) and the Truth in Lending Act (15 

4 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (81 Fed. Reg. 83934 (November 22, 

5 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                      EQUITY GENERAL PARTNER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert McKinney, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property
Analysts Master Limited Partnership;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 10, 2006

By: Feldman International Inc., its equity general partner


By: /s/ Robert McKinney
    ---------------------------------
Name: Robert McKinney
Title: President
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.21
 
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
OIL-DRI CORPORATION OF AMERICA
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
WHEREAS, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (the “Corporation”) maintains the Oil-Dri Corporation of America Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, Section 5.1 of the Plan provides that the Corporation may amend the Plan at any time; 
WHEREAS, the Corporation previously amended the Plan effective March 1, 2020, to freeze Plan participation and future benefit accruals; 
WHEREAS, Section 5.2 of the Plan provides that the Corporation may terminate the Plan at any time;
WHEREAS, the Corporation deems it appropriate to terminate the Plan effective June 30, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has previously approved terminating the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Corporation amends the Plan, effective June 30, 2020, to provide for its termination, as follows:
1.Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning as defined under the Plan.


2.Article 8 is added to the Plan and reads as follows:


“Article 8 - Plan Termination
8.1    Termination. Effective June 30, 2020 (the “Termination Date”), the Plan shall be terminated in accordance with this Article 8. 
8.2    Distribution of Benefits.
(a)    Except as provided in sections 8.2(b) and 8.2(c), all benefits payable to a Participant or Beneficiary under the Plan shall be distributed in the form of one lump sum no earlier than 12 months and no later than 24 months following the Termination Date.
(b)    All payments that become due to a Participant or Beneficiary pursuant to the Plan prior the first anniversary of the Termination Date shall be paid pursuant to the terms of the Plan without regard to this Section 8.2.
(c)    Any payments that would otherwise have been payable pursuant to the Plan on or after June 30, 2021, shall instead be paid in the form of one lump sum, with such lump sum payable no earlier than June 30, 2021 and no later than June 8, 2022.” 
 [Signature Page Follows]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Second Amendment to be executed by the signature of a duly authorized officer as of this 29th day of June 2020 effective as provided herein.











	
		
	



ATTEST
By: /s/ Laura G. Scheland
Its:  Vice President and General Counsel
Date: June 29, 2020
	COMPANY:
OIL-DRI CORPORATION OF AMERICA
By: /s/ Susan Kreh
Its:  CFO
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26583]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 15, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 652 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-310, K2025-308.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26583 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# Environmental Assessment

OSMRE GUIDE  - NEPA Review and Coordination PointsEnvironmental Assessment (EA)	

OMRE GUIDE  - NEPA Review and Coordination PointsEnvironmental Assessment (EA)
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant, 

v. OSHRC Docket No. 18-1701 

MIDVALE PAPER BOX CO., 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE 

The parties are requested to brief the following issues: 

(1) With respect to Citation 2, Item 2, Instance 1, did the judge err in concluding that the 

Secretary established employee exposure to the unguarded rotating shaft on the 

International Paper Box Machine Company Swifty Right-Angle Model FZ Gluer #1 

(Serial No. 602)? 

(2) With respect to Citation 2, Item 2, Instances 1 and 3 (failure to enclose horizontal 

shafting for Model FZ Gluer #1 and Model KH Gluer #3, respectively), did the judge 

err in concluding that the Secretary established that the violations are properly 

characterized as willful? 

(3) With respect to Citation 3, Item 3, did the judge err in concluding that the Secretary 

established employee exposure to the unguarded pulleys and horizontal belts on the #2 

Zerand Printing, Stripping, and Die Cutting machine? 

The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider either the merits 

or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, 

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. 

Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate. 
 

 

 

in accordance with Commission Rule 93. The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed 

in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service. 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: November 9, 2021 /s/ 

John X. Cerveny 

Executive Secretary 

2
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on September 30, 2019
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
14-1688
Science Applications International Corp., d/b/a SAIC
06/23/16
DFR
10/31/16
Closed

2
15-1121
Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.
06/30/16
DFR
11/09/16
Closed

3
14-1268
Dover High Performance Plastics
07/19/16
DFR
11/01/16
Closed

4
15-1347
Gate Precast Co.
11/10/16
DFR 
12/05/16
Closed

 5
 16-1533
Cooper/T. Smith Corporation, d/b/a Blakeley Boatworks, Inc.
 04/27/17
DFR
04/27/17
Closed




 6
16-0803
The Lane Construction Corporation 
05/23/17
DFR
09/14/17
Closed

 7
16-1167
Aerospace Testing Alliance
08/22/17
DFR
11/20/17
Closed

 8
15-1069
Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc.
10/27/17
DFR
11/13/17
   Closed

 9
16-0940
Angel Brothers Enterprises, Ltd.
11/17/17
DFR
12/15/17
Closed

10
17-0190
Shelly & Sands, Inc.
05/02/18
DFR
05/10/18
Closed

11
15-1574
MasTec North America dba MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.
06/20/18
DFR
07/10/18
Closed

12
17-0949
Walmart, Inc.
07/12/18
DFR
08/09/18
   Closed

13
16-1587
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc.
10/16/18
DFR
10/30/18
Closed

14
17-1214
Mansfield Industrial, Inc.
11/23/18
DFR
01/03/19
Closed

15
17-0483
Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
11/28/18
DFR
12/19/18
Closed

16
16-1628
Schaad Detective Agency, Inc.
12/18/18
DFR
01/07/19
Closed

17
17-1174
Wayne Farms, LLC
03/01/19
DFR
03/21/19
Closed

18
17-2144
Tampa Electric Co.
04/09/19
DFR
04/23/19
Closed

19
19-0142
Steven S. Moalemi, M.D., P.C., d/b/a Empire Physical Medicine and Pain Management
09/26/19
DFR



 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
# Official Journal L 130I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 130I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 654 May 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 130I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 654 May 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/699 of 3 May 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council by removing Russia as a destination from the scope of Union general export authorisations | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/699 of 3 May 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council by removing Russia as a destination from the scope of Union general export authorisations

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentleman:



In connection with the quarterly report of Featherlite, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Conrad D. Clement, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 14, 2004 |  | /s/ Conrad D. Clement  
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for March 2021

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month							21

2. Cases Added to Docket								0


  
3. Cases Subtracted from Docket							-4

MasTec North America dba MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.
No. 15-1574
Decision issued on March 2, 2021

FreightCar America, Inc.
No. 18-0970
Decision issued on March 3, 2021

StormForce of Jacksonville, LLC
No. 19-0593
Decision issued March 8, 2021

Tampa Electric Company
No. 17-2144
Decision issued March 19, 2021


4. Total Cases Pending End of Month							17
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brent
J. Santha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. Date: August 13, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Brent J. SanthaName: Brent J. SanthaTitle: Chief Financial Officer