alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1138 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a criminal penalty for 

launching drones that interfere with fighting wildfires affecting Federal 

property, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mr. COOK (for himself, Mr. ROYCE of California, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, and Mr. AGUILAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a criminal 

penalty for launching drones that interfere with fighting 

wildfires affecting Federal property, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wildfire Airspace Pro5 tection Act of 2017’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1138 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERFERENCE WITH WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION, 

2 LAW ENFORCEMENT, OR EMERGENCY RE3 SPONSE EFFORT BY OPERATION OF UN4 MANNED AIRCRAFT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 65 of title 18, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘§ 1370. Interference with wildfire suppression, law 

9 enforcement, or emergency response ef10 fort by operation of unmanned aircraft 

11 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Except as provided in subsection 

12 (b), an individual who operates an unmanned aircraft and 

13 in so doing knowingly or recklessly interferes with a wild14 fire suppression, law enforcement, or emergency response 

15 effort shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not 

16 more than 5 years, or both. 

17 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTIONS.—This section does not apply to 

18 the operation of an unmanned aircraft conducted by a unit 

19 or agency of the United States Government or of a State, 

20 tribal, or local government (including any individual con21 ducting such operation pursuant to a contract or other 

22 agreement entered into with the unit or agency) for the 

23 purpose of protecting the public safety and welfare, includ24 ing firefighting, law enforcement, or emergency response. 

25 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following 

26 definitions apply: 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1138 IH

1 ‘‘(1) WILDFIRE.—The term ‘wildfire’ has the 

2 meaning given that term in section 2 of the Emer3 gency Wildfire Suppression Act (42 U.S.C. 1856m). 

4 ‘‘(2) WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION.—The term ‘wild5 fire suppression’ means an effort to contain, extin6 guish, or suppress a wildfire.’’. 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

8 for chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

9 by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘1370. Interference with wildfire suppression, law enforcement, or emergency response effort by operation of unmanned aircraft.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 676 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 90328)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-339, K2025-337.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26619 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 31.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the
annual period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report
or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


By          /s/ PAUL G. DRISCOLL
         ------------------------------
                Paul G. Driscoll
               Vice President and
             Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 14, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and will
be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Frederick W. McTaggart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. Date: November 22, 2004
    
    By: /s/ Frederick W. McTaggartName: Frederick W. McTaggart
Title: Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 194 (Saturday, January 3, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H10998]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          ADDITIONAL SPONSORS TO PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS

  Under clause 7 of rule XII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 7325: Mr. Paul, Mr. Burton of Indiana, and Mr. 
     Gallegly.

                          ____________________
```
From: Nizich.Sharon@epamail.epa.gov 

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov; Gillis.Thomas@epamail.epa.gov; 

Silverman.Steven@epamail.epa.gov; Laney, Michael N.

Date: Wed 12/12/2012 2:45 PM

Subject: RE: TSD Appendices

CourtneyI forgot to attach the TSD appendices when I sent you the earlier files. I'm sorry about the oversight.

(See attached file: Final TSD Appendix.xlsx)

Sharon V. Nizich

Minerals and Manufacturing Group (MMG)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS - US EPA

RTP NC 27711

919/541-2825

"Higgins, Cortney" ---12/11/2012 03:28:33 PM---Thanks! Can you also send the following documents?

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/11/2012 03:28 PM

Subject: RE: Correlation curves for PM and CEMS

Thanks! 

Can you also send the following documents?

• Portland Cement Reconsideration Technical Support Document – the final 

December 2012 version

o If possible, can you send a redline comparison to the June 2012 

document?

• meeting notes, PCA November 28 2012

• response to comments document – if there are any responses that are 

not contained in the preamble, the full document or those responses

• S. Johnson, memo to docket, November 2012

Thanks,

Cortney
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H328]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 BLOCK THE NEXT CONGRESSIONAL PAY RAISE

  (Mr. MITCHELL asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. MITCHELL. Mr. Speaker, I rise to urge my colleagues to block the 
next scheduled congressional pay raise. At a time when the economy is 
forcing so many of the families we represent to tighten their belts, I 
believe this is the wrong time to be raising our own pay.
  Last month, 524,000 Americans lost their jobs, bringing the 
unemployment rate to its highest since 1993. Since last year, jobless 
rates increased in 49 States and in the District of Columbia. In my 
home State of Arizona, unemployment rose by over 50 percent, leaving 
nearly 200,000 workers unemployed.
  Last week, I introduced House Resolution 156, with Representative 
Paul of Texas, to stop the next automatic congressional pay raise from 
taking effect next year. As of this morning, we have been joined by 77 
cosponsors--Republicans and Democrats.
  Our Nation is at war. Our economy is reeling. The American people 
aren't getting a pay raise. We shouldn't either. I will be donating my 
2009 pay raise to charity just as I did with the 2008 pay raise.
  I urge my colleagues to join our growing coalition and to support the 
Stop the Congressional Pay Raise Act.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OFTITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, the Senior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of American Science &Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to theundersigned’s knowledge:

 

1.                    the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended March 31, 2010(“10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                    the information contained in the Company’s 10-K beingfiled fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company

 

Date: June 7, 2010

 
|   | /s/ KENNETH J.  GALAZNIK                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Kenneth J.  Galaznik                                            |
|   | *Senior  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toAmerican Science & Engineering, Inc. and will be retained byAmerican Science & Engineering, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Stan Genega, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Aduddell Industries, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-(e)) for theregistrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Reserved;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:May 15, 2007   /s/ Stan Genega Signature  Title: Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 30 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 30

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several 
 States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of 
      persons in each State who are citizens of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2017

 Mr. King of Iowa submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several 
 States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of 
      persons in each State who are citizens of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States 
according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by 
counting the number of persons in each State who are citizens of the 
United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             783
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,047
<PP&E>                                             996
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,043
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   156
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (126)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 
Commission Monthly Case Activity for September 2011 

1. 
Cases Pending Beginning of Month 37 

2. 
Cases Added to Docket 2 


Aerospace Manufacturing CT Systems, LLC 
No. 11-0315 
Petition for Interlocutory Review Granted on 09/06/11 

Bill Jones Repairs & Reroofs, Inc. 
No. 11-1284 
Direction for Review on 09/08/11 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket -4 
Otis Elevator Company 
No. 10-1057 
Final Order on 09/08/11 

Aerospace Manufacturing CT Systems, LLC 
No. 11-0315 
Order on 09/22/11 

Bill Jones Repairs & Reroofs, Inc. 
No. 11-1284 
Decision and Order on 09/22/11 

Southern Scrap Materials Co., Inc. 
No. 94-3393 
Decision on 09/28/11 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 35
OSMRE NEPA HANDBOOK 1 JULY 2019

APPENDIX 5.1 NEPA ADEQUACY REVIEW FORM EXAMPLE

[INSERT MINE NAME]

Federal Coal Lease [INSERT NUMBER] 

NEPA Adequacy Review Form

[INSERT NAME OF NEPA DOCUMENT]

[INSERT COUNTY, STATE]

[INSERT DATE]

United States Department of the Interior

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Program Support Division 

1999 Broadway, Suite 3320 Denver, CO 80202 

PH: 303-293-5000 FAX: 303-293-5032
OSMRE NEPA HANDBOOK 2 JULY 2019

Worksheet

NEPA Adequacy Review Form (NARF)

OFFICE: 

PROPOSED ACTION TITLE/TYPE: 

LOCATION/LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 

APPLICANT (if any): 

A. Description of the Proposed Action and any applicable mitigation measures

B. Identify applicable National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents and 

other related documents that cover the proposed action.

C. NEPA Adequacy Criteria

1. Is the new proposed action a feature of, or essentially similar to, an alternative analyzed 

in the existing NEPA document(s)? Is the project within the same analysis area, or if the 

project location is different, are the geographic and resource conditions sufficiently similar 

to those analyzed in the existing NEPA document(s)? If there are differences, can you 

explain why they are not substantial?

2. Is the range of alternatives analyzed in the existing NEPA document(s) appropriate with 

respect to the new proposed action, given current environmental concerns, interests, and 

resource values?

3. Is the existing analysis valid in light of any new information or circumstances (such as, 

rangeland health standard assessment, recent endangered species listings, updated lists of 

sensitive species)? Can you reasonably conclude that new information and new 

circumstances would not substantially change the analysis of the new proposed action?

4. Are the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects that would result from implementation of 

the new proposed action similar (both quantitatively and qualitatively) to those analyzed in 

the existing NEPA document?

5. Are the public involvement and interagency review associated with existing NEPA 

document(s) adequate for the current proposed action?
OSMRE NEPA HANDBOOK 3 JULY 2019

D. Persons/Agencies /OSMRE Staff Consulted

Identified below are those team members that conducted or participated in the preparation of 

this document.

Name:

Title:

Resource/Agency Represented:

Name:

Title:

Resource/Agency Represented:

Based on the review documented above, I conclude that this proposal conforms to the 

applicable land use plan and that the NEPA documentation fully covers the proposed action 

and constitute the OSMRE’s compliance with the requirements of NEPA.

Project Lead: Date:

NEPA Coordinator: Date:

Responsible Official: Date:

Note: The signed Conclusion on this Worksheet is part of an interim step in the OSMRE’s 

internal decision process and does not constitute an appealable decision.
consent.htm




 







Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141754) pertaining to Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 11, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 7, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H.







                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


 


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


October 27, 2010