alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 37 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 37

   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Defense, the 
General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space 
     Administration relating to the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

  Ms. Foxx (for herself, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Chabot, and Mr. Mitchell) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Defense, the 
General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space 
     Administration relating to the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Defense, the General Services 
Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
relating to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (published at 81 Fed. 
Reg. 58562 (August 25, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H373]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Franks) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  (Mr. FRANKS of Arizona addressed the House. His remarks will appear 
hereafter in the Extensions of Remarks.)

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         The following is a list of all subsidiary corporations of the
registrant. All subsidiaries are wholly-owned by the Company, except that
Buckley Mining Corporation and Plastics Universal Corporation are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Ada Mining Corporation. The Company's consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries.

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                          State of
           Subsidiary                                   Incorporation
           ----------                                   -------------
<S>                                                     <C>
Adams Resources Exploration Corporation                    Delaware
Kirbyville Marketing Co., Inc.                             Texas
Service Transport Company                                  Texas
Bayou City Pipelines, Inc.                                 Texas
Ada Crude Oil Company                                      Texas
Ada Mining Corporation                                     Texas
Classic Coal Corporation                                   Delaware
Plastics Universal Corporation                             Kentucky
CJC Leasing, Inc.                                          Kentucky
Buckley Mining Corporation                                 Kentucky
GulfMark Energy, Inc.                                      Texas
Ada Resources, Inc.                                        Texas
Adams Resources Marketing, Ltd.                            Texas
Adams Resources Marketing GP, Inc.                         Texas
Adams Resources Marketing II, Inc.                         Nevada
Gulfmark Energy Marketing, Inc.                            Nevada
</Table>
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1109 

AN ACT 

To amend section 203 of the Federal Power Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1109 EH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF FACILITY MERGER AU2 THORIZATION. 

3 Section 203(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Power Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 824b(a)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘such facili5 ties or any part thereof’’ and inserting ‘‘such facilities, or 

6 any part thereof, of a value in excess of $10,000,000’’. 

7 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION FOR CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS. 

8 Section 203(a) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

9 824b(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

10 new paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(7)(A) Not later than 180 days after the date 

12 of enactment of this paragraph, the Commission 

13 shall promulgate a rule requiring any public utility 

14 that is seeking to merge or consolidate, directly or 

15 indirectly, its facilities subject to the jurisdiction of 

16 the Commission, or any part thereof, with those of 

17 any other person, to notify the Commission of such 

18 transaction not later than 30 days after the date on 

19 which the transaction is consummated if— 

20 ‘‘(i) such facilities, or any part thereof, are 

21 of a value in excess of $1,000,000; and 

22 ‘‘(ii) such public utility is not required to 

23 secure an order of the Commission under para24 graph (1)(B). 

25 ‘‘(B) In establishing any notification require26 ment under subparagraph (A), the Commission 
3 

•HR 1109 EH

1 shall, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize 

2 the paperwork burden resulting from the collection 

3 of information.’’. 

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect 

6 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1109 

AN ACT 

To amend section 203 of the Federal Power Act.
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Section 302 Certification**

 

I, Charles P. Dougherty, certify that:

 

1.                          I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Science and Engineering, Inc.; and

 

2.                          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: July 29, 2016
|   | /s/ CHARLES P.   DOUGHERTY                |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Charles P.   Dougherty                    |
|   | *President   and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,807,014
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,474,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                   397,842
<INVENTORY>                                    302,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,200,960
<PP&E>                                       1,797,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                 522,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,860,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,532,043
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,435,268
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,139,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,860,652
<SALES>                                     20,639,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,639,845
<CGS>                                       14,227,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,479,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             358,466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                365,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                   302,090
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            365,065
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H73]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  APPOINTMENT OF TELLERS ON THE PART OF THE HOUSE TO COUNT ELECTORAL 
                                 VOTES

  The SPEAKER. Pursuant to Senate Concurrent Resolution 1, 111th 
Congress, the Chair appoints as tellers on the part of the House to 
count the electoral votes:
  The gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Brady) and
  The gentleman from California (Mr. Daniel E. Lungren).

                          ____________________
```
Opinion issued August 10, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 23 - 00 147 - CV

——————————— RICHARD STILLWELL A/K/A WILBERT RICHARD STILLWELL , Appellant V. NORTH EAST PINE V ILLAGE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION D/B/A

PINE V ILLAGE NORTH ASSOCIATION , Appellee
On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2016 - 74522
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Richard Stillwell, also known as Wilbert Richard Stillwell , ha s neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145 ; T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 5, 20.1; see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
.2

§§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b) , 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supr eme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15

- 9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On March 21, 2023 , appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established , by April 20, 2023

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond. Further, appellant ha s not paid or made arr angements to pay the fee for the
prepar ation of the clerk’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 37.3(b). On April 12, 202 3 , appellant w as notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not submit written evidence that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record by May 12, 2023

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant d id not adequately respond. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and want of prosecution

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly , Landau, and Farris

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EX REL. ANDY J. WATSON, DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY,

Respondent

v.

KAITLYN NICOLE CROSBY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 195 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 19, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00657

- CV

In re Mary Melinda PALACIO , a.k.a., Melinda Palacio

Origin al Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

R elator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8 (a). The

court’s opinion will follow at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on January 19, 2018

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED BY:

___________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016PC2950, styled In the Estate of Lucio A. Palacio, Deceased , pending

in the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Tom Rickhoff presiding.
Document

Exhibit 10.6
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (i) NOT MATERIAL AND (ii) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED

September 3, 2020


Mr. Andy Sklawer
Co-founder and COO
Brickell Biotech, Inc.
5777 Central Ave, Ste 102
Boulder, Colorado  USA 80301


RE:    Letter Agreement Concerning [***]
(“[***] Letter Agreement”)


Dear Andy,


As you know, Brickell Biotech, Inc. (“Brickell”) and Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (“Kaken”) exchanged numerous emails and had a series of discussions concerning the [***] (as such term is defined in Schedule A attached hereto).


The purpose of this [***] Letter Agreement is to document the agreement reached by Brickell and Kaken through the exchange of emails and discussions regarding the [***] and certain related matters so as to avoid any misunderstanding between Brickell and Kaken. Accordingly, Brickell and Kaken hereby confirm and set forth their agreement regarding the [***] and certain related matters as follows:


1.The [***] shall be “[***]” for purposes of the License, Development and Commercialization Agreement entered into between Brickell and Kaken as of March 31, 2015, as amended (“LDCA”) and specifically pursuant to Section [***] of the LDCA, subject to the terms set forth in this [***] Letter Agreement.


2.Notwithstanding Section [***] of the LDCA:


a.Kaken [***], including [***] in [***] of the Kaken Territory (as such term is defined in the LDCA): [***] and [***] for the following countries of the Kaken Territory: [***], with all such [***] listing Kaken as [***], at Kaken’s [***] cost and expense; and


b.Brickell [***], including [***] outside the Kaken Territory, with the [***] Brickell as [***], at Brickell’s [***] cost and expense.


3.No later than [***] prior to [***] for the [***], Kaken and Brickell shall inform each other [***] and [***] that they will [***] for the [***] in accordance with Paragraph 2(a) and Paragraph 2(b) of this [***] Letter Agreement.















4.Promptly after the date of this [***] Letter Agreement, Brickell and
Kaken will discuss in good faith the [***], obtaining necessary [***] to ensure that each of Brickell and Kaken have the rights to the [***] as set forth herein.


5.Except as expressly amended by this [***] Letter Agreement, the LDCA will remain in full force and effect.


Please kindly signify Brickell’s agreement to the foregoing terms by signing below where indicated and return a signed copy of this Letter Agreement to my attention.


Sincerely yours,
															
					
					
					
	/s/ [***]
				
	[***]
				
	[***]
Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
				
					
	Agreed this 3rd day of September, 2020.
				
					
					
					
	/s/ Andy Sklawer				
	Name: Andy Sklawer
				
	Title: Co-founder and COO
				
	Brickell Biotech, Inc.				
					


2









SCHEDULE A




[***]
[***]


[***]
[***]




and [***] (“[***]”).
3
EXHIBIT 32.1


        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
           OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report of American Hospital Management Corporation
a California corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2003, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Allen Shaw, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/  Allen Shaw
------------------------
     Allen Shaw
Chief Executive Officer

October 15, 2003

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Hospital Management Corp and will be retained by American
Hospital Management Corp. and furnished to the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
EXHIBIT 13.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the annual report of Oncolytics Biotech Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Brad Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Brad Thompson


_________________________________


Brad Thompson, PhD


Chief Executive Officer


Principal Executive Officer


March 19, 2015








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Oncolytics Biotech Inc. and will be retained by Oncolytics Biotech Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Subpart B -- Definitions

**§ 2204.201 Definitions.**

For the purposes of this part:

            *Adversary adjudication* means an adjudication under 5 U.S.C. 554 and 29 U.S.C. 659(c) in which the position of the Secretary is represented by counsel or otherwise, subject to certain exclusions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 504(b)(1)(C).

            *Agent* means any person other than an attorney who represents a party in a proceeding before the Commission pursuant to § 2200.22 of this chapter.

            *Commission* means the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

            *Demand* means the express demand of the Secretary which led to the adversary adjudication, but does not include a recitation by the Secretary of the maximum statutory penalty:

(1) In the administrative complaint; or

(2) Elsewhere when accompanied by an express demand for a lesser amount.

            *Excessive demand* means a demand by the Secretary, in an adversary adjudication arising from the Secretary’s action to enforce a party’s compliance with a statutory requirement that is substantially in excess of the decision of the judge or Commission and is unreasonable when compared with such decision, under the facts and circumstances of the case.

            *Final disposition* means the date on which a decision or order disposing of the merits of the adversary adjudication or any other complete resolution of the adversary adjudication, such as a settlement or voluntary dismissal, become final and unappealable, both within the agency and to the courts.

            *Judge* means the Administrative Law Judge appointed under 29 U.S.C. 661(j) who presided over the adversary adjudication or presides over an EAJA proceeding.

            *Party* means a party, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3), who is:

(1) An individual whose net worth did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; or

(2) Any owner of an unincorporated business, or any partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization, the net worth of which did not exceed $7,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated, and which had not more than 500 employees at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; except that an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code, or a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act, may be a party regardless of the net worth of such organization or cooperative association.  For purposes of 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(4), “party” also includes a small entity as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601.

            *Position of the Secretary* means, in addition to the position taken by the Secretary in the adversary adjudication, the action or failure to act by the Secretary upon which the adversary adjudication is based, except that fees and other expenses may not be awarded to a party for any portion of the adversary adjudication in which the party has unreasonably protracted the proceedings.

            *Secretary*means the Secretary of Labor.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H6]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 APPOINTMENT AS MEMBERS OF COMMITTEE TO NOTIFY THE PRESIDENT, PURSUANT 
                         TO HOUSE RESOLUTION 3

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Ross). Without objection, pursuant to 
House Resolution 3, the Chair announces the Speaker's appointment of 
the following Members to the committee on the part of the House to join 
a committee on the part of the Senate to notify the President of the 
United States that a quorum of each House has assembled and that 
Congress is ready to receive any communication that he may be pleased 
to make:
  The gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer) and
  The gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Boehner)
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
The HONORABLE RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge 1

for the District of Minnesota.

___________

No. 95-2559

___________

Petri R. Carmen; Laila T. *

Kujala-Carmen, family and *

friends of Petri R. Carmen, *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Mayo Foundation, doing business * District of Minnesota.

as Mayo Clinic; St. Mary's *

Hospital; Rochester Methodist * [UNPUBLISHED]

Hospital, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 26, 1996

 Filed: March 27, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Petri and Laila Kujala-Carmen filed a pro se diversity medical

malpractice action alleging defendants negligently diagnosed and treated

Petri for various medical problems. The district court concluded that the 1

Carmens' malpractice claims were outside the common knowledge of the lay

juror, and thus the requisite standard of care, causation, and damages

could not be established without expert testimony. Citing Minn. Stat.

§ 145.682, the district court dismissed, on defendants' motion, the

Carmens' complaint with prejudice for failing to comply with the statute's

expert identity
-2-

and opinions affidavit requirement, and this appeal followed.

We agree with the district court that expert testimony was necessary

for the Carmens to pursue their malpractice action, and that the Carmens'

failure to comply with Minnesota's expert affidavit requirements mandated

dismissal with prejudice. See Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Ctr.,

457 N.W.2d 188, 190 (Minn. 1990). We reject the Carmens' attempt to

supplement the record with regard to this claim, and grant defendants'

motion to strike the newly submitted evidence. See Dakota Indus., Inc. v.

Dakota Sportswear, Inc., 988 F.2d 61, 63 (8th Cir. 1993).

As to the Carmens' argument that the statute unconstitutionally

violates their Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial, we see no merit to

the contention that a party who has failed to present a prima facie case

has a right to a jury trial. We do not consider the Carmens' remaining

constitutional arguments presented for the first time on appeal. See

United States v. Dixon, 51 F.3d 1376, 1383 (8th Cir. 1995).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.