alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 358/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 358 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5929 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 358

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5929 September 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2016/C 358/01 | Position (EU) No 15/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 91/2003 on rail transport statistics, as regards the collection of data on goods, passengers and accidents Adopted by the Council on 18 July 2016 | 1 |
| 2016/C 358/02 | Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 15/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 91/2003 on rail transport statistics, as regards the collection of data on goods, passengers and accidents | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2016/C 358/01

Position (EU) No 15/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 91/2003 on rail transport statistics, as regards the collection of data on goods, passengers and accidents Adopted by the Council on 18 July 2016

1

2016/C 358/02

Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 15/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 91/2003 on rail transport statistics, as regards the collection of data on goods, passengers and accidents

8

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 504 

Recognizing the 70th anniversary of the Fulbright Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2016 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

WYDEN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. COTTON, Mr. RUBIO, Mrs. CAPITO, and 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JUNE 28, 2016 

Reported by Mr. CORKER, without amendment 

JULY 6, 2016 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 70th anniversary of the Fulbright Program. 

Whereas August 1, 2016, marks the 70th anniversary of 

President Harry S. Truman signing into law the Act of 

August 1, 1946 (60 Stat. 754, chapter 723) (commonly 

known as the ‘‘Fulbright Act of 1946’’); 

Whereas the Fulbright Program was established by Senator 

James William Fulbright of Arkansas for the ‘‘promotion 

of international good will through the exchange of students in the fields of education, culture, and science’’; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 504 ATS 

Whereas the Fulbright Program is sponsored by the Bureau 

of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the Department of 

State; 

Whereas the Fulbright Program provides approximately 

8,000 grants annually and, as of 2016, operates in more 

than 160 countries, including 50 that have established 

cost-sharing binational commissions; 

Whereas approximately 1,300 institutions of higher education 

in the United States, both public and private, host students at home and send scholars abroad; 

Whereas current Fulbright students and scholars hail from 

all 50 States and 2 United States territories, and approximately a quarter are from minority or underrepresented populations; 

Whereas more than 370,000 individuals from across the globe 

have benefitted from this unique opportunity; 

Whereas alumni of the Fulbright Program include 54 Nobel 

Prize laureates, 82 recipients of the Pulitzer Prize, 33 

heads of state, 16 Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients, 8 members of the United States Congress, and a 

former Secretary-General of the United Nations; 

Whereas, on April 21, 2016, an American Elm was planted 

on the grounds of the United States Capitol in recognition of the 70th anniversary of the Fulbright Program; 

and 

Whereas the Fulbright Program promotes United States 

higher education abroad and remains a valuable diplomatic tool: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 504 ATS 

1 (1) recognizes the 70th anniversary of the Ful2 bright Program; 

3 (2) encourages the President and the Secretary 

4 of State to work with the Bureau of Educational 

5 and Cultural Affairs of the Department of State to 

6 support the work of the Fulbright Program; 

7 (3) congratulates all past and present recipients 

8 of Fulbright awards; and 

9 (4) calls on students, scholars, and profes10 sionals around the world to seek out opportunities to 

11 engage with each other and promote international 

12 good will. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEAN EMMANUEL JABOUIN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 1714

[ July 18, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; George Odom , Judge; L.T. Case No. 18012319CF10A

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender

, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L

. Bettendorf, Senior Assistant Attorney General

, W est Palm Beach , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , F ORST and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                     As Adopted Pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended October 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David
Dutton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: November 13, 2006 | /s/ David Dutton
                     David DuttonChief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### Bruha, Appellant, vs. La Crosse Plow Company, Respondent.

*April 3*

April *30, 1935.*

*240For the appellant there was a brief by *Lees & Bunge*of La Crosse, and oral argument by *Geo. W. Bunge.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *George H. Gordon, Law & Gordon*of La Crosse, and oral argument by *George H. Gordon.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

It was contended at the trial, upon oral argument and in briefs of counsel here, that the plaintiff accepted the principal of his note, with interest to November 22, 1926, in full satisfaction and accord of his claim. We find it unnecessary to determine that question. It appears without dispute that the entire principal was paid. The payment is so indorsed upon the back of the note; ninety per cent of the principal having been paid February 5, 1930, and the remaining ten per cent having been paid February 23, 1931, all interest being paid to November 22, 1926. The note, being payable upon demand, was due when the loan was made. *Barty v. Minahan,*127 Wis. 570, 107 N. W. 488; 17 R. C. L. p. 769, § 136, cases cited note 16.

It is a well-established principle of law that where interest is recoverable upon payments deferred beyond the time of maturity it is recoverable as damages; that it does not constitute a distinct claim, and can only be recovered in an action brought for the principal. Under such circumstances, a separate action cannot be maintained for the interest when the principal sum has been paid and discharged. *Stewart v. Barnes,*153 U. S. 456, 14 Sup. Ct. 849, 38 L. Ed. 781; 17 C. J. p. 814, and cases cited footnote 28; 1 Sutherland, Damages, p. 1199, § 372.

In this case the interest is claimed because of a withholding of payment at a time when the note was long overdue. Under such circumstances, interest measures plaintiff’s damages for a detention of the payment, and is not a payment *241due under the contract. *Lash v.*Lambert, 15 Minn. 416. In a case where the contract provided for interest “on each of said sums at the .rate of six per cent per annum from date hereof until paid,” it was held an action could be maintained for interest, although the principal had been paid. *W. W. Kimball Co. v.*Williams, 36 App. D. C. 43, 23 Ann. Cas. 1331, and cases cited in note. See also *Bennett v. Federal Coal & Coke Co.*70 W. Va. 456, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 588, and cases cited in note.

The plaintiff having accepted payment of the principal, he is in no position to maintain an action for interest accruing after the note became due.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2013

h1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2013

145779

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145779

COA: 304998

Oakland CC: 2011-235532-FC

DAJUAN MARTELL GEORGE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of November 20, 2012, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 

2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

People v Hardy (Docket No. 144327) and People v Glenn (Docket No. 144979). On 

order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 29, 2013, 494 Mich 430 (2013), 

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EDGAR HTML



      

      

         


      



      Exhibit 4.1
      


      THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
      


      NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON 


      2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN, N.Y. 11217 


        


      October 20, 2020 


        


      Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 


      2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza 


      Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 


      SmartTrust 493 (the "Fund")
      


      Dear Sirs: 


      The Bank of New York Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on October 19, 2020, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-239866) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.
      


      


      
         	

                  


               	

                  Very truly yours, 


               
	

                    


               	

                    


               
	

                  


               	

                  /s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO 


               
	

                  


               	

                  Gerardo Cipriano 


               
	

                  


               	

                  Vice President
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Pivinski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:   Date: May 9, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Joseph PivinskiName:
    Joseph PivinskiTitle:
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IB 

Union Calendar No. 66 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1039 

[Report No. 115–112] 

To amend section 3606 of title 18, United States Code, to grant probation 

officers authority to arrest hostile third parties who obstruct or impede 

a probation officer in the performance of official duties. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2017 

Mr. REICHERT (for himself and Mr. PASCRELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 8, 2017 

Additional sponsor: Mr. POE of Texas 

MAY 8, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1039 RH

A BILL 

To amend section 3606 of title 18, United States Code, 

to grant probation officers authority to arrest hostile 

third parties who obstruct or impede a probation officer 

in the performance of official duties. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1039 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Probation Officer Pro5 tection Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF PROBATION OFFICERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3606 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘and return 

10 of a probationer’’ and by inserting ‘‘authority 

11 of probation officers’’; 

12 (2) by striking ‘‘If there’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) If 

13 there’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(b) A probation officer, while in the performance of 

16 his or her official duties, may arrest a person without a 

17 warrant if there is probable cause to believe that the per18 son has forcibly assaulted, resisted, opposed, impeded, in19 timidated, or interfered with the probation officer, or a 

20 fellow probation officer, in violation of section 111. The 

21 arrest authority described in this subsection shall be exer22 cised under such rules and regulations as the Director of 

23 the Administrative Office of the United States Courts 

24 shall prescribe.’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 1039 RH

1 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections for 

2 subchapter A of chapter 229 of title 18, United States 

3 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4 3606 and inserting the following: 

‘‘3606. Arrest authority of probation officers.’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 66 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1039 

[Report No. 115–112] 

A BILL 

To amend section 3606 of title 18, United States 

duties. a probation officer in the performance of official rest hostile third parties who obstruct or impede Code, to grant probation officers authority to arMAY 8, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 91 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 91

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  regarding Presidential election voting rights for residents of all 
              United States territories and commonwealths.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2017

   Ms. Plaskett submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  regarding Presidential election voting rights for residents of all 
              United States territories and commonwealths.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in 
the election for President and Vice President shall not be denied or 
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of residency 
in a territory or commonwealth of the United States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on January 31, 2017
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
09-1901
Seward Ship’s Drydock, Inc.
11/14/11
DFR
11/21/11, 04/17/13
Closed

2
08-1774
Angelica Textile Services, Inc.
09/28/12
DFR
10/16/12
Closed

3
11-2395
Kiewit Power Constructors Co.
01/24/13
DFR
03/04/13
Closed

4
12-0643
K.M. Davis Contracting, Inc.
01/25/13
DFR
01/30/13
Closed

5
11-2780
Peacock Engineering, Inc.
05/22/13
DFR
05/30/13
Closed

6
11-1734
Calpine Corporation
06/24/13
DFR
06/26/13
Closed

7
10-0637
BP Products North America, Inc., & BP-Husky Refining, LLC
09/16/13
DFR
11/01/13
Closed

8
12-1600
Envision Waste Services
02/10/14
DFR
02/24/14
04/16/14
Closed

9
12-2142
Meadows Construction Company, LLC
06/05/14
DFR
06/24/14
Closed

10
12-2385
Evergreen Construction Co.
08/11/14
DFR
10/24/14
Closed

11
12-1617
Houston Aquarium, Inc.
09/18/14
DFR
10/20/14
Closed

12
13-1022
Mid South Waffles, Inc., d/b/a Waffle House #1283
12/31/14
DFR
02/03/15
Closed

13
14-0948
Florida Gas Contractors, Inc.
01/15/15
DFR
02/06/15
Closed

14
12-1287
CSA Equipment Company, LLC
01/16/15
DFR
02/09/15
Closed

15
13-0224
A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc.
03/23/15
DFR
04/08/15
Closed

16
13-1817
Missouri Basin Well Service Inc.
04/23/15
DFR
05/07/15
Closed

17
14-0844
Quick Transport of Arkansas, LLC
07/01/15
DFR
07/28/15
Closed

18
13-1124
Integra Health Management, Inc.
07/21/15
DFR
09/18/15
Closed

19
13-0900
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc.
08/31/15
DFR
09/18/15
Closed

20
13-1169
North Eastern Precast LLC
10/29/15
DFR
11/02/15
Closed

21
13-1170
Masonry Services Inc. dba MSI
10/29/15
DFR
11/02/15
Closed

22
13-0644
Wynnewood Refining Co., LLC
03/03/16
DFR
03/18/16
Closed

23
13-0791
Wynnewood Refining Co., LLC
03/03/16
DFR
03/18/16
Closed

24
14-1688
Science Applications International Corp., d/b/a SAIC
06/23/16
DFR
10/31/16
Open

25
15-1121
Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.
06/30/16
DFR
11/09/16
Open

26
15-1121
Dover High Performance Plastics
07/19/16
DFR
11/01/16
Open

27
15-1347
Gate Precast Company
11/10/16
DFR
12/05/16
Open

28
14-0816
Manson Construction Company
01/11/17
DFR
 





 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	7th Fleet Aircraft Transits Taiwan Strait
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">7th Fleet Aircraft Transits Taiwan Strait</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Feb. 27, 2023</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>TAIWAN STRAIT – A U.S. Navy P-8A Poseidon transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace on Feb. 27, 2023 (local time). The United States will continue to fly, sail, and operate anywhere international law allows including within the Taiwan Strait. By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations. The aircraft’s transit of the Taiwan Strait demonstrates the United States’ commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Mymetics Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 12, 2004           /s/ Christian Rochet
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 12, 2004           /s/ Ernst Lubke
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Principal financial and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as a separate
disclosure document.