alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FY 2022 BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE LAW AML GRANT DISTRIBUTION

State/Tribe

P1-P3 

Unfunded Inventory 

9/30/21 

(eAMLIS) Eligible for BIL

Eligible 

Historic 

Coal 

Tonnage Percentage of Total

FY22 

Annual 

Distribution

Alabama 553,504,081 Yes 1,254,440 2.8257% 20,450,847

Alaska 25,780,985 Yes 13,536 0.0305% 1,333,333

Arkansas 17,618,343 Yes 104,296 0.2349% 1,700,314

Colorado 33,714,287 Yes 611,350 1.3771% 9,966,699

Illinois 141,992,123 Yes 4,647,256 10.4683% 75,763,148

Indiana 175,548,879 Yes 1,513,001 3.4082% 24,666,108

Iowa 82,051,415 Yes 367,329 0.8274% 5,988,480

Kansas 795,136,278 Yes 297,779 0.6708% 4,854,623

Kentucky 902,515,504 Yes 4,554,605 10.2596% 74,252,680

Louisiana - No - 0.0000% -

Maryland 69,832,367 Yes 295,137 0.6648% 4,811,551

Mississippi 23,410 No - 0.0000% -

Missouri 114,709,224 Yes 359,548 0.8099% 5,861,629

Montana 137,938,666 Yes 282,225 0.6357% 4,601,049

New Mexico 33,889,106 Yes 148,627 0.3348% 2,423,032

North Dakota 35,341,075 Yes 190,256 0.4286% 3,101,700

Ohio 506,348,432 Yes 2,848,828 6.4172% 46,443,789

Oklahoma *** 128,422,725 No 214,174 0.4824% 3,491,630

Pennsylvania 5,078,533,785 Yes 15,022,237 33.8388% 244,904,081

Tennessee 46,693,768 Yes 526,185 1.1853% 8,578,273

Texas 1,385,912 Yes 60,503 0.1363% 986,367

Utah 6,335,800 Yes 353,866 0.7971% 5,768,996

Virginia 422,806,023 Yes 1,397,951 3.1490% 22,790,474

West Virginia 1,731,126,309 Yes 8,633,592 19.4479% 140,751,469

Wyoming 44,181,763 Yes 594,834 1.3399% 9,697,442

Crow Tribe - No - 0.0000% -

Hopi Tribe - No - 0.0000% -

Navajo Nation 1,829,000 Yes 101,943 0.2296% 1,661,953

Nat'l Total 11,087,259,260 No Data $44,393,498 100.0000% $ 724,849,667

Footnotes:

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law AML Grant Distribution presents only the Fiscal Year 2022 grant amount that each eligible State and Tribe will receive. Eligibility for these grant funds is limited to 

States and Tribes with an approved AML Program. These grant funds are distributed through a congressionally mandated formula under Public Law 117-58. Eligible States and Tribes will receive 

annual BIL AML grant distributions for the remaining 14 years, subject to any required adjustments. 

Adjustments were made, as required by BIL, to ensure that each eligible State and Tribe receive at least $20M over the course of the 15 year distribution, unless the amount needed for 

reclamation projects on the State or Tribal lands is less than $20M. 

*** Consistent with McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), and related cases, neither the State of Oklahoma nor any of its agencies are currently eligible for BIL AML funding. Oklahoma v. 

U.S. Dep’t of the Interior, No. CIV-21-719-F, 2021 WL 6064000 (W.D. Okla. Dec. 22, 2021). In the event that one or more entities become eligible for BIL AML grants this fiscal year, OSMRE is 

reserving BIL funds for AML reclamation on Indian lands in Oklahoma.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 91771-91772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration

Notice of Supplemental Funding; Rural Health and Economic 
Development Analysis Program

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department 
of Health and Human Services.

[[Page 91772]]

ACTION: Notice of supplemental funding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HRSA provided supplemental funds to the sole award recipient 
of the Rural Health and Economic Development Analysis Program to 
support a research project that quantifies the relationships between 
health care and economic factors in rural communities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karis Tyner, Federal Office of Rural 
Health Policy, HRSA, at [email protected] and 240-645-5756.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Intended Recipient of the Award: University of Kentucky.
    Amount of Non-Competitive Award: One award for $175,000.
    Project Period: September 1, 2022, through August 31, 2025.
    Assistance Listing (CFDA) Number: 93.155.
    Award Instrument: Cooperative Agreement Supplement for Research.
    Authority: Section 711 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 912).

                                      Table 1--Recipients and Award Amounts
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Grant No.                    Award recipient name             City, state          Award amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U1ZRH33331..............................  University of Kentucky....  Lexington, KY.............        $175,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Justification: The University of Kentucky, the sole recipient of 
the Rural Health and Economic Development Analysis Program funding, 
possesses specialized experience in rural health care research and 
economic analysis that positions it to be the most qualified entity to 
perform this work. The funding allows the University of Kentucky to 
collect and analyze additional data on health care and economic 
impacts, building on the planned research project and providing more 
information to inform policy makers and other rural stakeholders. Its 
research may focus on emerging issues at the intersection of rural 
health care improvement and rural economic analysis.

Diana Espinosa,
Principal Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024-27109 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
```
# Official Journal C 117A/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.117.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 117A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5226 May 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.117.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 117A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5226 May 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 117A/01 | Vacancy for a Director (Grade AD 14) of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm — COM/2009/10181 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2009/C 117A/01

Vacancy for a Director (Grade AD 14) of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm — COM/2009/10181

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2009/C 117A/02 | REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs | s3 |

2009/C 117A/02

REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 95 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 95

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas 9 in 10 parents want their child to study computer science, but only 40 
        percent of schools teach computer programming;
Whereas low-income students and students from small towns and rural communities 
        are less likely to attend a school that offers computer science 
        programming;
Whereas computing makes up two-thirds of all projected new jobs in science, 
        technology, engineering, and mathematics fields;
Whereas there are over 500,000 open computing jobs nationwide and such job 
        openings are projected to grow at twice the rate of all other jobs;
Whereas significant workforce shortages in computing fields, particularly in 
        cybersecurity, can pose significant threats to our national security; 
        and
Whereas computing occupations are among the highest paying jobs for new 
        graduates: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress expresses support for the use of public-private 
partnerships to bring computer science education to more K-12 
classrooms throughout the country.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 95

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing support for the use of public-private partnerships to bring 
          computer science education to more K-12 classrooms.
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 13, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 13, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0372. GIBBS LANDSCAPE COMPANY et al. v. LUCERO CARDONA.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

1719448
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                          58,428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  325,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    337,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               768,087
<PP&E>                                         437,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,793,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          474,032
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     530,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,793,532
<SALES>                                      2,712,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,712,086
<CGS>                                        2,199,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  449,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                95,413
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (71,082)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,251)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,831)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  9,712
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,543)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)
        

</TABLE>
#### Hale, Respondent, vs. Schultz and another, Appellants.

*November 12*

December *8, 1936.*

*286For the appellants there was a brief by *Peterson & Slo-cumb*of Menomonie, attorneys, and *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toebaas*of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by *Harold M. Wilkie*and *Carl E. Peterson.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Higbee & Higbee*of La Crosse, and oral argument by *Jesse E. Higbee.*

Fairchild, J.

The propositions which control this case are the same as those ruled upon in the case of *Swanson v. Schultz, ante,*p. 278, 270 N. W. 43. The two cases were tried.together at the circuit and argued together in this court. The negligence of the driver of appellant’s truck having been determined to be the cause of the collision with the car in which respondent was riding, and the driver of that car being free from negligence, the rulings on the questions of negligence and resulting liability are controlled by the decision in the companion case.

Plere, as in the *Swanson Case,*the trial court was of the opinion that the damages allowed by the jury were excessive. Without determining the lowest amount an impartial jury, properly instructed, would'reasonably fix, he apparently reduced the assessment here in the same manner as in the *Swanson Case.*Error exists because of the character of the option given respondent. The judgment of the trial judge on the question of whether damages are excessive or not must be accorded considerable influence when the matter is presented to this court. He has seen the witnesses and heard the testimony. When, however, the record discloses that the judge probably failed to follow the correct rule in correcting an excessive assessment of damages, if the situation warrants such interference at all, we must return the case for his further action in the matter unless we can determine from the evidence submitted what the proper amount is, under the *287rule. The circumstances present in this case put it under the ruling of the companion case.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for the granting of an option to plaintiff to take judgment for the lowest amount or submit to a new trial under the rule provided for such cases.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6474

WILFREDO ANDUJAR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

KENNY ATKINSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02126-FL)

Submitted: May 30, 2017 Decided: June 12, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilfredo Andujar, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Andujar, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Andujar leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Andujar v. Atkinson, No. 

5:14-hc-02126-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             528
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                       647
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,717
<PP&E>                                           4,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                     280
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,786
<BONDS>                                          2,591
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,041
<SALES>                                            489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   489
<CGS>                                              385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                Certification of the Principal Executive Officers

                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

We, Morris H. Wheeler, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Robert W.
Pawlak, the Chief Financial Officer of Cohesant Technologies Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31,
2004 (the "Report"):

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

/s/ Morris H. Wheeler
---------------------
Morris H. Wheeler
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 29, 2004

/s/ Robert W. Pawlak
--------------------
Robert W. Pawlak
Chief Financial Officer
September 29, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S262]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            RECESS UNTIL SUNDAY, JANUARY 11, 2009, AT 1 P.M.

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, if there is no further business to come 
before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it stand in recess 
under the previous order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 2:43 p.m., recessed until 
Sunday, January 11, 2009, at 1 p.m.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,882   <F1>
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,975   <F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,299
<PP&E>                                      79,229
<DEPRECIATION>                             (20,198)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,789
<BONDS>                                     53,983   <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (17,377)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,332
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,438
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            32,344   <F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   198   <F5>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,813)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<FN>
<F1>  Includes  restricted  cash  $157,000
<F2>  Includes  notes  receivable  of  $2,100,000
<F3>  Net  of  a  bond  discount  of  $737,000
<F4>  Represent  total  expenses including depreciation of $1,816,896, excluding
      financial  expenses  reproted separately.
<F5>  Represents  a  provision  for  income  tax  from a deferred tax liability.


</TABLE>
H. J. Res. 42 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

Joint Resolution 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to drug 

testing of unemployment compensation applicants. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘Federal-State Unemployment Compensation Program; Middle 

Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 Provision on Establishing Appropriate Occupations for Drug Testing of Unemployment 

Compensation Applicants’’ (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 50298 (August 

1, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals

 

NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN

 CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104-3741 ASSISTANT CLERK

TELEPHONE 334-229-0733

February 9, 2024

CL-2023-0390

Victoria Smith v. Otis Smith (Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court: DR18-900067.01).

ORDER

You are hereby notified that the following action was taken in the 

above cause by the Court of Civil Appeals: 

Application for Rehearing Overruled. No opinion written on 

rehearing.

Moore, P.J., and Edwards, Hanson, and Fridy, JJ., concur.

Nathan P. Wilson, Clerk