alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

             EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


    The following is a list of subsidiaries of AFC at December 31,
1996.  All corporations are subsidiaries of AFC and, if indented,
subsidiaries of the company under which they are listed.

                                                                   Percentage of
                                                     State of      Common Equity
Name of Company                                      Incorporation   Ownership

American Financial Enterprises, Inc.                  Connecticut        83%
American Premier Underwriters, Inc.                   Pennsylvania       81
  Pennsylvania Company                                Delaware          100
    Atlanta Casualty Company                          Illinois          100
    Infinity Insurance Company                        Florida           100
     Leader National Insurance Company                Ohio              100
   Republic Indemnity Company of America              California        100
   Windsor Insurance Company                          Indiana           100
Great American Holding Corporation                    Ohio              100
  Great American Insurance Company                    Ohio              100
    American Annuity Group, Inc.                      Delaware           81
      AAG Holding Company                             Ohio              100
        Great American Life Insurance Company         Ohio              100
          Loyal American Life Insurance Company       Alabama           100
          Prairie National Life Insurance Company     South Dakota      100
            American Memorial Life Insurance Company  South Dakota      100
        American Annuity Capital Trust I              Delaware          100
    American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company   Delaware          100
    American National Fire Insurance Company          New York          100
    Brothers Property Corporation                     Ohio               80
    Great American Management Services, Inc.          Ohio              100
    Mid-Continent Casualty Company                    Oklahoma          100
    Millennium Dynamics, Inc.                         Ohio              100
    Stonewall Insurance Company                       Alabama           100
    Transport Insurance Company                       Ohio              100

    The names of certain subsidiaries are omitted, as such subsidiaries
in the aggregate would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

    See Part I, Item 1 of this Report for a description of certain
companies in which AFC owns a significant portion and accounts for
under the equity method.

                                 E-3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-K of Alcan Inc. for the year ended 31 December 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                             261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                        55
<INVENTORY>                                      2,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,656
<PP&E>                                          16,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,840
<BONDS>                                          3,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        160
<COMMON>                                         4,597
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,407
<SALES>                                          9,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,244
<CGS>                                            7,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  78
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    867
<INCOME-TAX>                                       254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       618
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.45


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit (99)(i)

                                  NEWS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                          AMERICAN STANDARD'S DIASORIN
                            ANNOUNCES VIRUS DISCOVERY

Piscataway, NJ - February 24, 1999 - DiaSorin Inc., a member of the Medical
Systems Group of American Standard Companies Inc. (NYSE: ASD), today announced
that its scientists have discovered a previously unidentified virus with several
variants. The virus and its variants have unique genomic sequences that have
been characterized at the molecular level and a prototype assay has been
developed.

Preliminary studies on a limited number of subjects appear to link this virus to
advanced liver disease of as yet unknown cause. Furthermore, the virus has been
found in a high percentage of intravenous drug abusers. The prevalence of the
virus in healthy blood donors is low.

Recognizing the difficulty of linking a new viral agent to diseases of unknown
cause and the potential significance of these findings to blood banking,
DiaSorin intends to extend its studies to assess the biological significance of
this viral agent in an expeditious manner. To this end, DiaSorin is inviting
clinical investigators to participate in studies of this virus.

Patent applications covering this discovery have been filed. Its future
commercialization potential, however, is considered speculative at the present
time and will depend on, among other things, issuance of the patents applied for
and development of additional evidence confirming linkage of the virus with
disease of presently unknown cause.

American Standard is the global, diversified manufacturer of Trane(R) and
American Standard(R) air conditioning products, American Standard(R), Ideal
Standard(R), Standard(R) , Porcher(R), Armitage Shanks(R) and Dolomite(R)
plumbing products, WABCO(R) commercial and utility vehicle braking and control
systems, LARA(R) and Copalis(R) medical diagnostic systems and DiaSorin(TM)
medical diagnostic products.


For Further Information Contact:
Ray Pipes (732) 980-6095

The latest news release and corporate information can be heard on
1-888-ASD-NEWS. Additional information on American Standard is available on the
Company's Worldwide Web site at http://www.americanstandard.com
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 97 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 97

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
  Agriculture relating to ``Tongass National Forest Land and Resource 
                      Management Plan Amendment''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

Mr. Young of Alaska submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
  Agriculture relating to ``Tongass National Forest Land and Resource 
                      Management Plan Amendment''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Agriculture relating to ``Tongass 
National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment'' (81 Fed. 
Reg. 88657 (December 8, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                               ------------
                               CERTIFICATION
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
"Report") of AMCON Distributing Company (the "Company") for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2009, I, Christopher H. Atayan, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, have executed this
certification for furnishing to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
I hereby certify that:

    (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of the Company.


Date: April 16, 2009         /s/ Christopher H. Atayan
                             ------------------------------
                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
                              and Chairman



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to AMCON Distributing Company and will be retained by AMCON
Distributing Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.40





 



    	 



    	 



    

 





 



    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Landlord and Tenant have executed this Third Amendment as of the year and date above first written.


 


	 	LANDLORD:
	 	 
	 	
        900 NORTH MICHIGAN. LLC,
	 	a Delaware limited liability company
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Patrick Meara
	 	Print Name:	Patrick Meara
	 	Title:	Vice President
	 	 
	 	TENANT:
	 	 
	 	
        GROSVENOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT,

        L.P., an Illinois limited partnership

	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Paul Meister
	 	Print Name:	Paul Meister
	 	Title:	V.P. of Grosvenor Holdings, L.L.C.
	 	 	Manager of GCM, L.L.C.
	 	 	G.P. of Grosvenor Capital Management, L.P.


 


 


S-1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 26, 2011 

p0919 

Order 

 

September 26, 2011 

143211 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143211 

 COA: 297166 

Wayne CC: 09-026001-FH 

MARK LEWIS NEDROW, a/k/a 

MARK L. NEDROW, a/k/a MARK LOUIS 

NEDROW, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,112
<PP&E>                                          72,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,534
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         63,510<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,763)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,985
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,086
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,378
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,971)<F2>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,971)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
<FN>
<F1>Net of bond discount of $1.253 million.
<F2>Net of minority interest in losses of $.027 million.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

STEVEN MCLEOD )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) C.A. No. N11C

- 03

- 111 MJB

)

HUGHEY F. MCLEOD )

)

)

Defendant. )

Submitted: February 25, 2015

Decided: April 6, 2015

Upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Allow Expert Testimony by Video conference

, GRANTED

.

OPINION

Steven A. McLeod, pro se , 1050 Big Joe Road, Monticello, Florida 32344

.

Cynthia H. Pruitt, Esq., Doroshow, Pasquale

, Krawitz & Bhaya, 1208 Kirkwood Highway,

Wilmington, Delaware 10805, Attorney for Defendant.

Brady, J.2 This is a personal injury case. Plaintiff Steven A. McLeod (“Plaintiff”) alleges that he

was sexually abused by his father Defendant H ughey F. McLeod (“Defendant”) from

approximately December 1967 through January 1972. Both parties were domiciled in Delaware

at the time of the alleged abuse, but both now reside in Florida. Plaintiff is incarcerated in

Florida serving a life sentence . On April 29, 2011, Plaintiff filed the instant action under 10 Del.

C . § 8145.

On February 25, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Motion for an Order Allowing Plaintiff’s expert

,

Dr. Marianne Barnes

, to testify by videoconference. 1 Plaintiff explains that Dr. Bar nes currently

resides in the State of Mississippi. Because Dr. Barnes’ testimony is expected to last less than an

hour and a half, Plaintiff requests that the witness be permitted to testify using videoconferencing

technology instead of traveling to Delaw are to be physically present in the courtroom. 2 Plaintiff

requests this accommodation for the convenience of the witness and to limit the cost of the

expert’s testimony

. 3

Delaware courts routinely make reasonable accommodations for witnesses in both civil

and criminal trials. 4 As a prevailing party may move to recover expert witness fees, including

travel expenses, 5 it is in the interest of both parties to limit these expenses where practicable.

Allowing Dr. Barnes to testify by videoconference is a reas onable accommodation in the instant

case , provided that the appropriate technology arrangements can be made between Dr. Barnes

and the Court , as well as with Plaintiff, if he is not present in the courtroom.

1 Motion, Item 209, at 1.

2 Motion, Item 209, at 1.

3 Motion, Item 209, at 2.

4 See, e.g., Wilmoth v. Donegal Ins. Co ., 2004 WL 78021, *1 (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 6, 2004) ( The Court allowed

plaintiff’s counsel to finish their arguments after the defendant had presented its defense in order to accommodate

various witnesses).

5 Super. Ct. Civ. R. 54; 10 Del. C. §8906.3 Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order All owing Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Marianne

Barnes, to testify by videoconference is hereby GRANTED

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________ /s/

__________________

M. J ANE B RADY

Superior Court Judge
#### In the Matter of Lawrence Timson, Appellant, v Janice Timson, Respondent.

[774 NYS2d 751]

In a proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 240, the father appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Stack, J.), dated March 5, 2003, which, inter alia, denied, without a hearing, his petition, in effect, for unsupervised visitation with the parties’ child, and (2) from so much of an order of the same court dated June 26, 2003, as, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 5, 2003, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated June 26, 2003, made upon reargument; and it is further,

*692Ordered that the order dated June 26, 2003, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the mother.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, his petition, in effect, for unsupervised visitation with his child. One who seeks to modify an existing order of visitation is not automatically entitled to a hearing, but must make some evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant it (see *Matter of Goldberg v Goldberg,*300 AD2d 585 [2002]; *Matter of Gerow v Gerow,*257 AD2d 718 [1999]). Here, the father failed to provide any evidence to demonstrate a change of circumstances which would warrant unsupervised rather than supervised visitation.

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Krausman, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E85-E86]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        HONORING MICHAEL MUSSER

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. GEORGE RADANOVICH

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, January 14, 2009

  Mr. RADANOVICH. Madam Speaker, I rise today to posthumously honor 
Michael Musser. Mr. Musser passed away on November 3, 2008.
  Michael Musser was born and raised in Fresno, California. He 
graduated from Fresno High School in 1968. Just four years later he was 
married to Anna. They lived a happy life together. They have two 
children; Jason and Julie. His children and five grandchildren still 
live in the Fresno area. Mr. Musser was an avid golfer. However, if 
there was a family event, his family would always come first.
  Madam Speaker, I rise today to honor Michael Musser. I invite my 
colleagues to join me in honoring his life and wishing the best for his 
family.

[[Page E86]]

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>   1
 
EXHIBIT 23 -- CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of American General Corporation of our report dated February 12, 1996,
included in the 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders of American General
Corporation.
 
     Our audits also included the financial statement schedules of American
General Corporation listed in Item 14(a). These schedules are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth herein.
 
     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 REGISTRATION
                                  STATEMENT
                                    NUMBER                                  ON FORM
<S>  <C>                                                                    <C>     <C>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     33-39200............................................................     S-8
     33-39201............................................................     S-8
     33-39202............................................................     S-8
     2-98021.............................................................     S-8
     33-51973............................................................     S-8
     33-19075............................................................     S-3
     33-30693............................................................     S-3
     33-51045............................................................     S-3
     33-58317............................................................     S-3
     33-58317-01.........................................................     S-3
     33-58317-02.........................................................     S-3
     333-00513...........................................................     S-4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
 
of our report dated February 12, 1996, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our report included
in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedules
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of American General Corporation.
 
                                          /s/  Ernst & Young LLP
 
Houston, Texas
March 20, 1996
AMENDMENT NO



EXHIBIT 10.8

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 is entered into as of May 7, 2020 (“Amendment No. 1”), and is intended to be, and shall constitute an amendment to the Executive Employment Agreement dated October 16, 2018 (“Agreement”), by and between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. (“GCEH” or “Company”), and Richard Palmer (hereinafter, “Executive,” and collectively with the Company, the “Parties”). 

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein to increase the base salary payable to Executive;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.Section 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

 

“2.1Base Salary.  For the duration of the Term, for all services rendered by Executive hereunder and all covenants and conditions undertaken by the Parties pursuant to this Agreement, the Company shall pay, and Executive shall accept, as compensation, an annual base salary (“Base Salary”) of $350,000.  The Base Salary shall be payable in regular installments in accordance with the normal payroll practices of the Company, in effect from time to time, but in any event no less frequently than on a monthly basis.” 

 

2.All other terms and conditions of the Agreement, except as modified by this Amendment No. 1, shall remain in full force and effect. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this Amendment No. 1 effective as of the date specified above. 

	 

	GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.

 

 

By:/s/ DAVID R. WALKER  

Name:  David R. Walker

Title:  Chairman of the Board

 


	 

	EXECUTIVE

 

 

/s/ RICHARD PALMER  

Richard Palmer

 




 


    1