alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27181]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 455 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-375, K2025-373.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27181 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit (32)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with this Annual Report of American Greetings Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the year ended February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Corporation certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



April 29, 2008







|                                                      |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Zev Weiss                                         |  | 
|Zev Weiss                                             |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
|                                                      | 
|/s/ Stephen J. Smith                                  |  | 
|Stephen J. Smith                                      |  | 
|Senior Vice President and                            
|Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                     As Adopted Pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Dutton, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: August 3, 2007 | /s/ David Dutton
                     David DuttonChief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6338
STEPHEN T. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN DOE, Captain, Caldwell County Jail; JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Caldwell County Jail; JOHN DOE, Correction Officer, Caldwell County Jail; J. AUSTIN, Correction Officer, Caldwell County Jail; MIA LNU, Correction Officer, Caldwell County Jail; JANE DOE, Nurse, Caldwell County Jail; JANE DOE, Dietitian, Caldwell County Jail, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-95-111-5-MU) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen T. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Doe , No. CA-95-111-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 90 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 90

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate the 
      expenditure of funds for political activity by corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2017

 Ms. Shea-Porter (for herself, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Hastings, 
  Mr. Raskin, Mr. Welch, and Mr. Soto) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate the 
      expenditure of funds for political activity by corporations.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Nothing in this Constitution shall prohibit Congress 
and the States from imposing content-neutral regulations and 
restrictions on the expenditure of funds for political activity by any 
corporation, limited liability company, or other corporate entity, 
including but not limited to contributions in support of, or in 
opposition to, a candidate for public office.
    ``Section 2. Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed 
to abridge the freedom of the press.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the report of Consolidated
Water Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Sasnett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date: November 9, 2012 | By: | /s/ David W. Sasnett                              
|---------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------
|                       |     | David W. Sasnett                                  
|                       |     | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|                       |     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 95 

Expressing support for the use of public-private partnerships to bring 

computer science education to more K–12 classrooms. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2017 

Mr. TAYLOR (for himself, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, and Mr. KILMER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the use of public-private partnerships 

to bring computer science education to more K–12 classrooms. 

Whereas 9 in 10 parents want their child to study computer 

science, but only 40 percent of schools teach computer 

programming; 

Whereas low-income students and students from small towns 

and rural communities are less likely to attend a school 

that offers computer science programming; 

Whereas computing makes up two-thirds of all projected new 

jobs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 

fields; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 95 IH 

Whereas there are over 500,000 open computing jobs nationwide and such job openings are projected to grow at 

twice the rate of all other jobs; 

Whereas significant workforce shortages in computing fields, 

particularly in cybersecurity, can pose significant threats 

to our national security; 

Whereas computing occupations are among the highest paying jobs for new graduates; and 

Whereas, by 2020, there will be 1,400,000 computer-sciencerelated jobs available, but only about 400,000 computer 

science graduates who will have the skills necessary to 

apply for those jobs: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress expresses support for the 

3 use of public-private partnerships to bring computer 

4 science education to more K–12 classrooms throughout 

5 the country. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### Cedar Point Park Association, Respondent, vs. Lenney, Appellant.

*September 12*

October *10, 1939.*

*435The cause was submitted for the appellant on, the brief of *Lyman K. Arnold*of Elkhorn, and for the respondent on that of *Charles E. Lyon*of Elkhorn and *Olin & Butler*of Madison.

Fritz, J.

The plaintiff and respondent noticed a motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that the defendant, Michael T. Lenney, has not served his notice of appeal upon his codefendant, Helen A. Lenney, who is jointly bound by the judgment appealed from, as is required by the provision in sec. 274.12, Stats., that—

> “In case one of a number of parties jointly or severally bound by the same judgment appeals therefrom, he shall serve his notice of appeal on all parties who are bound with him by the judgment.”

As Michael T. Lenney and his codefendant Llelen A. Len-ney were clearly jointly bound by provisions in the judgment from which he attempted to appeal without having her join with him in his notice of appeal, and without any service thereof upon her or a representative of her estate, his appeal has not been perfected so as to confer jurisdiction on this court. *Stevens v. Jacobs,*226 Wis. 198, 275 N. W. 555, 276 N. W. 638; *Joachim v. Wisconsin Dental Clinic,*219 Wis. 35, 261 N. W. 745. Consequently the respondent’s motion for the dismissal of the appeal must be granted.

As no jurisdiction has been conferred upon this court, no relief can be granted on Michael T. Lenney’s countermotion in this court for leave to change the title of the action by excluding the name of Helen A. Lenney as a defendant and *436appellant, and to permit him to' continue and prosecute his appeal. Pie bases that motion upon an affidavit that Helen A. Lenney, who was his wife, died October 15, 1938, after the entry of the judgment appealed from; that his notice of appeal was served on the respondent on December 28, 1938; that he, as survivor, succeeded to his wife’s interest in the lands, which were owned by them as joint tenants and were adjudged herein to be subject to sale on foreclosure to satisfy the maintenance liens in question; that he took the appeal in good faith, but through mistake and accident failed to obtain an order excluding Helen A. Lenney as a defendant, and directing that the action continue in his name. Neither good faith in attempting to take an appeal, which, however, has not been perfected by service of notice thereof upon all parties who are bound with the appellant by the judgment, nor the death of one of the parties between the time of the entry of judgment and the time of the service of a notice of appeal constitutes a ground for relieving an appellant from the consequence of his noncompliance with the statutory requirement to serve his notice of appeal upon all parties bound with him by the judgment. *Stevens v. Jacobs, supra.*In that case we stated that the legislature might properly make provision against the defeat under such circumstances of an appeal attempted in good faith, but that the court cannot supply remedial legislation.

*By the Court.*— Appeal dismissed.
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on August 31, 2020
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
14-1268
Dover High Performance Plastics
07/19/16
DFR
11/01/16
Closed

2
16-1167
Aerospace Testing Alliance
08/22/17
DFR
11/20/17
Closed

3
15-1069
Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc.
10/27/17
DFR
11/13/17
   Closed

4
17-0190
Shelly & Sands, Inc.
05/02/18
DFR
05/10/18
Closed

5
15-1574
MasTec North America dba MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.
06/20/18
DFR
07/10/18
Closed

6
17-0949
Walmart, Inc.
07/12/18
DFR
08/09/18
   Closed

7
17-1214
Mansfield Industrial, Inc.
11/23/18
DFR
01/03/19
Closed

8
17-0483
Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
11/28/18
DFR
12/19/18
Closed

9
16-1628
Schaad Detective Agency, Inc.
12/18/18
DFR
01/07/19
Closed

10
17-1174
Wayne Farms, LLC
03/01/19
DFR
03/21/19
Closed

11
17-2144
Tampa Electric Co.
04/09/19
DFR
04/23/19
Closed

12
18-0034
Armstrong Utilities, Inc. d/b/a Armstrong Cable Services
10/15/19
DFR
10/24/19
Closed

13
17-0138
Home Rubber Company, LP
10/22/19
DFR
  11/04/19
Closed

14
18-0970
FreightCar America, Inc.
10/28/19
DFR
11/04/19
Closed

15
18-0758
RoadSafe Traffic Systems, Inc.
10/30/19
DFR
11/01/19
Closed

16
17-1894
Maxim Crane Works
02/06/20
DFR
02/14/20
Closed

17
17-0737
UHS of Westwood Pembroke, Inc.
UHS of Delaware, Inc.
03/19/20
DFR
03/25/20
Closed

18
19-0593
StormForce of Jacksonville, LLC
06/04/20
DFR
07/28/20
Open

19
18-1091
Keenan, Hopkins, Suder and Stowell Constractors, Inc. dba KHS&S Contractors
07/10/20
DFR
07/23/20
Open

20
19-1922
Arch-Tech Construction
08/11/20
DFR



21
18-0068
Roy Rock, LLC
08/21/20
DFR
08/28/20
Open

22
18-1451
Summit Contracting Group, Inc.
08/24/20
DFR



23
16-1713
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR



24
16-1813
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR



25
16-1872
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR



26
17-0023
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR



27
17-0279
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR



 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
[image]
                                            United States of America
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
                                  1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor
                                        Washington, DC 20036-3457


SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.
OSHRC Docket No. 17-2144
TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, 

Respondent.


BRIEFING NOTICE
The parties are requested to brief the issues presented in the Secretary’s petition for discretionary review, and in particular:
(1)	Did the judge err in requiring the Secretary to prove actual exposure to anhydrous ammonia at a level above OSHA’s permissible exposure limit in order to establish that Respondent violated 29 C.F.R. § 1910.120(q)(3)(iv) (procedures for handling emergency response)? 
(2)	Did the judge err in ruling at the hearing that evidence Critical Intervention Services (CIS) employees suffered adverse health effects due to anhydrous ammonia exposure is irrelevant to determining whether a violation of § 1910.120(q)(3)(iv) has been established?
The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider either the merits or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review.  Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.
All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.[1]  The first brief is to be filed within 40 days of this notice.  A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission in writing within the applicable time for filing briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties.  The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service.

						BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION




Dated:	April 23, 2019				/s/						
						John X. Cerveny
						Executive Secretary

---------------------------
[1]
 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies.  The Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party.  Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WORLDWIDE PETROMOLY, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         117,814
<SECURITIES>                                   951,448
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     89,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,558,954
<PP&E>                                         116,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,750,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          423,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,914,773
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,875,458)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,750,050
<SALES>                                         65,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,318
<CGS>                                           52,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               534,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (485,375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (485,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (485,375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on September 30, 2018
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
12-1617
Houston Aquarium, Inc.
09/18/14
DFR
10/20/14
Closed

2
13-1022
Mid South Waffles, Inc., d/b/a Waffle House #1283
12/31/14
DFR
02/03/15
Closed

3
14-0948
Florida Gas Contractors, Inc.
01/15/15
DFR
02/06/15
Closed

4
12-1287
CSA Equipment Company, LLC
01/16/15
DFR
02/09/15
Closed

5
13-0224
A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc.
03/23/15
DFR
04/08/15
Closed

6
14-0844
Quick Transport of Arkansas, LLC
07/01/15
DFR
07/28/15
Closed

7
13-1124
Integra Health Management, Inc.
07/21/15
DFR
09/18/15
Closed

8
13-0900
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc.
08/31/15
DFR
09/18/15
Closed

9
13-0644
Wynnewood Refining Co., LLC
03/03/16
DFR
03/18/16
Closed

10
13-0791
Wynnewood Refining Co., LLC
03/03/16
DFR
03/18/16
Closed

11
14-1688
Science Applications International Corp., d/b/a SAIC
06/23/16
DFR
10/31/16
Closed

12
15-1121
Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.
06/30/16
DFR
11/09/16
Closed

13
14-1268
Dover High Performance Plastics
07/19/16
DFR
11/01/16
Closed

14
15-1347
Gate Precast Co.
11/10/16
DFR 
12/05/16
Closed

15
 16-1533
Cooper/T. Smith Corporation, d/b/a Blakeley Boatworks, Inc.
 04/27/17
DFR
04/27/17
Closed




16
16-0803
The Lane Construction Corporation 
05/23/17
DFR
09/14/17
Closed

17
16-1167
Aerospace Testing Alliance
08/22/17
DFR
11/20/17
Closed

18
15-1069
Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc.
10/27/17
DFR
11/13/17
   Closed

19
16-0940
Angel Brothers Enterprises, Ltd.
11/17/17
DFR
12/15/17
Closed

20
17-0190
Shelly & Sands, Inc.
05/02/18
DFR
05/10/18
Closed

21
15-1574
MasTec North America dba MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.
06/20/18
DFR
07/10/18
Open

22
17-0949
Walmart, Inc.
07/12/18
DFR
08/09/18
Open

 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review