alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 665 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-323, K2025-321.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26590 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.5
 
                             Consulting Agreement

Parties: Spacetec IMC Corp and George R. Rea
--------

Issue to be addressed: SIMC needs to make revenue targets for Q2. Several 
distracting factors may keep top management from concentrating on this goal 
(Sun Capital, CFO missing/recruitment, issues listed in BOD presentation 
regarding shortfall in Q1)

Consultant Function:
--------------------

a) provide focal point for all BOD-related issues. Resolve and communicate 
   with Board and President/COO.

b) Provide back-up management to enable Pres/COO to place heavy emphasis on
   Sales activities.

c) Support Gain and Sullivan on any projects to free Pres/COO to place heavy 
   emphasis on Sales activities.

Responsibility/Authority:
-------------------------

a) President/COO retains decision making and personnel management authority for 
   SIMC.

b) Consultant will work using the general form of the standard SIMC consulting 
   agreement.

c) Consultant will have office in Boott Mill and be on-site a majority of days, 
   and will be available telephonically on other days.

Period: Until Sun Capital is completed or 9/30/98 or whichever other date is 
agreed by the parties.

Compensation:
-------------

a) Expenses of rental car, apartment or condo in good location, travel to
   Florida for 2 twice per month, reasonable miscellaneous living costs.

b) Cash compensation of $1,500 per day being $30,000 per month, pro-rated if 
   completed before 9/30/98.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                             4,661
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     44,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                       1,473
<INVENTORY>                                       66,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   4,140
<PP&E>                                            89,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   306,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             98,825
<BONDS>                                          128,501
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             316
<OTHER-SE>                                        65,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     306,479
<SALES>                                           67,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                             53,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     63,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     399
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 4,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         726
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (2,010)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      (236)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (2,246)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.07)
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 24, 2019

No. 04-19-00580-CR

Cheryl STEVENSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR6195

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant Cheryl Stevenson entered into a plea bargain with the State, and pled nolo 

contendere to the charged offense. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the 

agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO 

right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Stevenson timely filed a notice of appeal. The 

clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea 

bargain agreement, has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal 

“if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the 

record.” Id.

The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the 

punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Stevenson does 

not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding 

that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification 

is accurate). 

Appellant is hereby given notice that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to rule 

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing that 

Stevenson has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by October 15, 2019. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, 

order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not 

designated for publication).
We order all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further 

order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court 

reporter.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1
                             ------------
                            CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
"Report") of AMCON Distributing Company (the "Company") for the fiscal
quarter ended March 26, 2004, I, William F. Wright, Chariman and Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

    (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 10, 2004          /s/ William F. Wright
                                -------------------------
                                Title: Chairman and Principal
                                        Executive Officer
[639 NYS2d 764]

#### In the Matter of James Mitchell Flick, an Attorney, Resignor.

Fourth Department,

March 8, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*James Mitchell Flick,*Winthrop, Massachusetts, resignor *pro se.*

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on February 22, 1977 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that in 1990 he moved to Maine, where he currently resides and practices law, that he has no intention of returning to New York to practice law, and that he is resign*9ing because he no longer wishes to maintain his attorney registration. There are no complaints pending against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name removed from the roll of attorneys.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.4**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                               |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income found on pages 3 & 4 of the
company's Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,867
<SECURITIES>                                    38,785
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,373
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,918
<PP&E>                                           8,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,974
<BONDS>                                         74,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,788
<SALES>                                         15,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,501
<CGS>                                            5,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,384)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,816
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30887 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TIMMY COBBINS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 96-CV-1657-I (89-295)

- - - - - - - - - - December 23 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Timmy Cobbins, federal inmate #21216-034, appeals the denial of this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Cobbins argues that because the superseding indictment charged him and his codefendants/conspirators with using “and” carrying firearms during and in relation to a drug conspiracy and because “and” and “or” both mean “and,” the Government was obligated to prove both “use” and “carry” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and the Government did not prove active employment of the firearm, i.e. “use,” asNo. 96-30887 - 2 - defined by Bailey v. United States , 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). He also argues that the jury instructions covering § 924(c) erroneously defined “use” under the statute as defined by Bailey and that in light of the remand in United States v.Fike , 82 F.3d 1315, 1328 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 241 (1996), Cobbins’ case should receive the same result. We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate record. For essentially the same reasons as explained by the district court in its order denying § 2255 relief, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying Cobbins’ motion.
See United States v. Cobbins , No. 96-1657 (89-295) (E.D. La. July 31, 1996). To the extent that Cobbins requires a certificate of appealability (COA) in order to appeal the district court’s judgment, we conclude that Cobbins has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
AFFIRMED. COA DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7008

TRAVIS J. MARRON, a/k/a Abdul Mu’Min,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GUARD, SGT., MILLER; GUARD FLAVIN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief

District Judge. (7:13-cv-00338-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: December 10, 2014

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis J. Marron, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Travis J. Marron appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on this action arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons 

Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Marron v. Miller, No. 7:13-cv-00338-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. 

June 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
M otion Granted, Memorandum Opinion filed October 18, 2018 Withdrawn,

Appeal Reinstated, and Order filed November 13 , 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00727

- CV

____________ SONIA BARBOZA , Appellant

V.
MORRELL MASONRY SUPP LY, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- 20565



### ORDER

On October 18, 2018 , this court issued an opin ion dismissing this appeal for want of prosecution for failure to pay for the clerk’s record. On October 30, 2018
, appellant filed a motion stating that she had paid for the clerk’s record. On November 6, 2018, the clerk’s record was filed. Appellant’s mot ion is granted

. This court’s opinion filed October 18, 2018 is withdrawn , and our judgment
of that date is vacated

. The appeal is ordered reinstated.The clerk’s record reflects that t his is an appeal from a judgment signed May

9, 2018 . Appellant file d a timely post

- judgment motion extending appellate
timetables . The notice of appeal was due September 7, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P.
26.1. Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on September 17, 2018 , a date within 15 days of the due date for the not ice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of
its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did
not file a motion to extend time to file the not ice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 199 8, no pet.).
Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal and ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date
of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; 1 0 .5(b). If appellant does not comply w ith this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Donovan, Wise, and Jewell.
#### Barlow & Seelig Manufacturing Company, Respondent, vs. Patch, Appellant.

*November 4*

December *3, 1940.*

*225
      *Samuel M. Pedrick*of Ripon, attorney, and *A. Trevor Jones*of Chicago, Illinois, of counsel, for the appellant.

*Allan L. Edgarton*of Fond du Lac, for the respondent.

Wickhem, J.

The sole question debated upon this appeal is whether in entering the judgment appealed from the circuit court followed the mandate of this court. If it did, the judgment so entered is the judgment of this court and cannot be appealed from. If it did not, the remedy is by mandamus, and this court will not entertain an appeal. The sole remedy of defendant is an original action invoking the supervisory power of this court to compel the lower court to follow its mandate. *Falk v. Wisconsin Tax Comm.*204 Wis. 518, 235 N. W. 925; *Miswald-Wilde Co. v. Armory Realty Co.*213 Wis. 354, 251 N. W. 450. It follows that defendant’s appeal must be dismissed.

*By the Court.*— Appeal dismissed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 17, 2023
No. 04

- 23

- 00017

- CR Hector Enrique LARA
- SANCHEZ ,

Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas

Tria l Court No. 2022CR3039 Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The trial court’s certification in this appeal states “this criminal case

. . . is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(a)(2). This court must dismiss this appeal “ if a certification that t he defe ndant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We ORDER A ppellant to cause an amended trial court certification to be filed in this
co urt within T HIR TY days of the date of this order showing A ppellant has the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d) , 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). If no amended trial court certification is filed as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d)

. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of February, 2023

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk o f Court