alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUL-3-1999             JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998             SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          57,648                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  389,717                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    366,991                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               885,727                       0
<PP&E>                                         431,473                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,897,604                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          517,951                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     608,098                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,897,604                       0
<SALES>                                      1,478,370               1,338,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,478,370               1,338,828
<CGS>                                        1,208,393               1,082,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  224,938                 220,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,196                  18,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,843                  16,793
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,931                   7,002
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,912                   9,791
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,912                   9,791
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36                    0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36                    0.22
        

</TABLE>
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

January 27 , 2022.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00721

- CR NO. 14

- 21

- 00722

- CR NO. 14

- 21

- 00723

- CR

IN RE KEENEN JOSEPH , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 209th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1672991 , 1729933 & 1731742



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 13, 2021 , relator Keenen Joseph filed a petition for writ of habeas c orpus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R.2

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to order the Harris County District Attorney to show cause why relator should not be released on reasonable bond

. Original jurisdiction to grant a w rit of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.05 ; Ex Parte Hawkins , 885 S.W.2d 586, 588 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 1 994, orig. proceeding). A court of appeals d oes not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction to consider a challenge to the denial of bail

. Ortiz v. State , 299 S.W.3d 930, 932 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2009, orig. proceeding)

. Accordingly , we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Pois sant. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0377 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRANDON ANTHONY PERESSINI,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 2 3, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 13 2023

02/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0377
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H76]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  (Ms. WOOLSEY addressed the House. Her remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.)

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 189 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1327]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
  No committee meetings were held.
```
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westell Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


/s/ E. Van Cullens
-----------------------------
E. Van Cullens
Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2003


/s/ Nicholas C. Hindman
-----------------------------
Nicholas C. Hindman
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2003
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 17, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23

- 697 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- 11245

________________ 

### Vincenzo Bruno, e t a l. , Appellant s ,
vs. 

### Thomas Drechsler, et al

. , Appellee s

.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Valerie R. Manno Schurr , Judge. Sniffen & Spellman , P.A. , and Robert J. Hauser (West Palm Beach), for appellant s

. Venable LLP , and Aaron S. Blynn , Jonathan E. Perlman and Avi Zemel , for appellee s

.
Before M ILLER, GORDO and BOKOR , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 Affirmed. Escobar v. Marino , 342 So. 3d 748 , 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) ( “We review the denial of a motion to vacate a default under an abuse of discretion standard.” (quoting Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Dimanche , 338 So. 3d 408, 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) ) ; Schwartz v. Bus. Cards Tomorrow, Inc. , 644 So. 2d 611, 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (“[I] n setting aside a default, the trial court must determine inter alia (1) whether the defendant has demonstrated excusable neglect in failing to respond; (2) whether the defendant has demonstrated a meritorious defense; and (3) whether the defendant, subsequent to learning of the default, has demonstrated due diligence in seeking relief. ”); Techvend, Inc. v. Phoenix Network, Inc. , 564 So. 2d 1145, 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (“[I] t is uncontradicted that the defendant

- appellant did not move to set aside the judgment until more than three months after it became aware of its existence . . . [i] t is entirely clear that such a delay c onstituted a lack of the due diligence which is required to justify setting aside a default. ”); Kraus v. Kraus , 344 So. 3d 634, 635 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) ( “We review a trial court ’ s order denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings de novo.” ); Perez Es calona v. City of Miami Beach , 227 So. 3d 722, 724 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ( “A motion for judgment on the pleadings must be decided wholly on the pleadings and is granted only if the pleadings establish that the movant3 is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” ) (internal quotations omitted) ; Kraus , 344 So. 3d at 635 (“ The trial court properly denied the [party’s] motion for judgment on the pleadings. ”) (footnote omitted).
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                     As Adopted Pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarter ended September 25, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ludger
Viefhues, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: May 26, 2006 | /s/ Ludger Viefhues
                     Ludger ViefhuesChief Financial Officer
|------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          32,077
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         900,979
<DEPRECIATION>                                 165,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 862,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        324,501
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     369,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   862,263
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,211
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,536
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,536
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,536
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.70



</TABLE>
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 9 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 

Members of Congress from receiving compensation during a fiscal year 

unless both Houses of Congress have agreed to a concurrent resolution 

on the budget for that fiscal year prior to the beginning of that fiscal 

year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. FITZPATRICK submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to prohibit Members of Congress from receiving 

compensation during a fiscal year unless both Houses 

of Congress have agreed to a concurrent resolution on 

the budget for that fiscal year prior to the beginning 

of that fiscal year. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 9 IH 

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

2 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

3 for ratification: 

4 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. A Member of Congress may not receive 

6 a compensation for service as a Member of Congress dur7 ing a fiscal year unless both Houses of Congress have 

8 agreed to an identical concurrent resolution on the budget 

9 for that fiscal year prior to the beginning of that fiscal 

10 year. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. This article shall apply with respect to 

12 fiscal years which begin after this article becomes a valid 

13 part of the Constitution.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21

List of Subsidiaries



|                                               |  |                                
|---------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Name                                           |  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation  
|Analogic Limited                               |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANALOGIC FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION             |  | U.S. Virgin Islands            
|Analogic China Holding Limited                 |  | Hong Kong                      
|Analogic Holding Luxembourg S.a.r.l.           |  | Luxembourg                     
|Analogic Japan KK                              |  | Japan                          
|Analogic Medical Equipment (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. |  | China                          
|ANALOGIC SECURITIES CORPORATION                |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANADVENTURE II CORPORATION                     |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANA/DVENTURE 3 CORPORATION                     |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANADVENTURE DELAWARE, INC.                     |  | Delaware                       
|ANRAD CORPORATION                              |  | Province of Nova Scotia, Canada
|B-K Medical Holding ApS                        |  | Denmark                        
|B-K Medical ApS                                |  | Denmark                        
|B-K Medical AB                                 |  | Sweden                         
|B-K Medical Benelux NV/SA                      |  | Belgium                        
|B-K Medical Medizinische Systeme GmbH          |  | Germany                        
|B-K Medicale S.r.L                             |  | Italy                          
|B-K Medical Systems, Inc.                      |  | Massachusetts                  
|B-K Medical (China) Limited                    |  | Hong Kong                      
|Copley Motion Systems, LLC                     |  | Delaware                       
|FTNI Inc.                                      |  | Province of Quebec, Canada     
|Sound Technology, Inc.                         |  | Pennsylvania
## Our Programs

Restoring the EnvironmentReclaiming Abandoned Mine Lands

Protecting the EnvironmentRegulating Coal Mines

Applying Science & TechnologyTechnology Development and Transfer

## OSMRE News

### OSMRE announces rule making it easier for public to report coal mine problems

April 4, 2024

### Biden-Harris Administration Announces More Than $244 Million to Address Legacy Pollution, Revitalize Communities in Pennsylvania

April 3, 2024

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

### Biden-Harris Administration Announces Nearly $23 Million to Address Legacy Pollution and Revitalize Coal Communities in Virginia

March 28, 2024

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

            -  
Thanks to individuals like Carter G. Woodson, there is a great record of the relationship between Black history and the history of coal. Please enjoy the following interesting facts about Black history in coal communities.
 Image 
            -  
What do wetlands and abandoned coal mines have in common? Although they appear to be complete opposites, there are several ways in which these features affect each other. Read the rest of the story here.
 Image 
            -  
The Department of the Interior announces the availability of funding for states and Tribes to support reclamation efforts in fiscal year 2021. Federal grants will support job creation and community revitalization.

Read Full Story
 Image 
            -  
Stay connected with OSMRE through social media! Join us on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn to learn more about our programs.
 Image 
            -  
Visit the Newsroom to read the latest stories and news release on OSMRE programs and activities.

Read the Releases
 Image
#### In re Relocation of County Highway: Marx, Appellant, vs. Trempealeau County, Respondent.

*March 4*

June *4, 1929.*

*76For the appellant there was a brief by *Schubert & Stevenson*of La Crosse, and oral argument by *A. H. Schubert.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Elmer E. Barlow,*attorney, and *Gaveney, Barlow & Fugina,*of counsel, all of Arcadia, and oral argument by *Elmer E. Barlow.*

Stevens, J.

Mr. Chief Justice Vinje did not participate in the consideration and decision of the case in this court. The members of the court participating in such decision were equally divided in opinion upon the questions presented by this appeal. Under the established rule it follows that the judgment appealed from is affirmed. *Fox River Paper Co. v. Railroad Comm.*189 Wis. 626, 628, 208 N. W. 266.

*By the Court,*— Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MORAN 
TRANSPORTATION COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND 
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                       361
<INVENTORY>                                      4,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,401
<PP&E>                                         122,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,478
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,052
<SALES>                                         52,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,393
<CGS>                                           36,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (48)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    44.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    43.26
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 691 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-360, K2025-358.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27164 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P