alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheet  of  AT&T  Corp.  at  December  31,  1998,  and the
consolidated  statement of income for the twelve-month period ended December 31,
1998,  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3,160
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,060
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,118
<PP&E>                                         52,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                 25,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 59,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,442
<BONDS>                                        5,556
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,630
<OTHER-SE>                                     22,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   59,550
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               53,223
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  45,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,389
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,072
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                 1,300
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (137)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,398
<EPS-BASIC>                                    2.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.37


</TABLE>
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Research conducted by: Betty Chambers Page 1 of 1

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 31

January 4, 1984

Gayle Townley 

Deputy Chief Mine Inspector 

Department of Mines 

4040 N. Lincoln, Suite 107 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105

TOPIC: OPERATOR CERTIFICATION FOR UNDERGROUND MINING; BONDING COSTS; 

STATE CIVIL PENALTY DATA; AND NOV VARIANCE.

INQUIRY: Under SMCRA Sec. 503(a), in order for a state to obtain primacy under the Act, it 

must enact state law which provides regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation 

operations "in accordance with the requirements of [the] Act". Moreover, the state regulatory 

program must be "consistent with" the federal regulations promulgated under SMCRA. Has 

there been any interpretation of what constitutes "in accordance with" and "consistent with"?

SEARCH RESULTS:

(1) Contacted several states (Colorado, Wyoming, West Virginia, Kentucky, Illinois and 

Arkansas) and the Mine Safety Health Administration (MSHA) concerning operator certification 

requirements to operate an underground mine. Survey concluded that any specific requirements 

for underground mining operations are regulated by the individual states. West Virginia's 

requirements are comparable to Oklahoma. Illinois has an extensive background in mine safety 

requirements and will be available to explain their procedures.

(2) OSM reported that East Tennessee State is presently working on a basic nationwide 

information survey, i.e., number of mines, bonds per acre, etc. -- a gross statistical survey. It is 

not a states comparison survey and the information is on a voluntary basis. The survey will be 

available for distribution in approximately a month. Chuck Meyers, at OSM, is coordinating the 

survey and is available for further details.

(3) The IMCC distributed a questionnaire in 1984 for states' civil penalty system data. Most of 

the states are in line with OSM's point system with the exception of Ohio and Pennsylvania. A 

copy of the questionnaire and several states' reports are enclosed: Indiana, Ohio, Alabama, 

Kentucky, Virginia, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Illinois.

(4) No state has been identified as having received a variance with regard to NOV's.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 106 

To amend the VOW to Hire Heroes Act of 2011 to make permanent the 

Veterans Retraining Assistance Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the VOW to Hire Heroes Act of 2011 to make 

permanent the Veterans Retraining Assistance Program, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help Hire Our Heroes 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VETERANS RETRAINING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

7 (a) PERMANENT PROGRAM.—Section 211 of the 

8 VOW to Hire Heroes Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–56; 

9 38 U.S.C. 4100 note) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 106 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(2)(B), by striking ‘‘the pe2 riod beginning October 1, 2012, and ending March 

3 31, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘each subsequent fiscal 

4 year that the program is carried out’’; and 

5 (2) by striking subsection (k). 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section is 

7 further amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘Not later 

9 than July 1, 2012, the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘Except as 

11 provided by subsection (k), each’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘Each’’; 

13 (3) in subsection (e)(1)(G), by striking ‘‘by not 

14 later than October 1, 2013,’’; 

15 (4) by striking subsection (i); and 

16 (5) by redesignating subsections (j) and (l) as 

17 subsections (i) and (j), respectively. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS24-21]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

# ACTION:

Notice of special closed meeting.

*Description:*                     In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, codified at 12 U.S.C. 3333(b), notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) met for a Special Closed Meeting on this date.                

*Location:*                     Virtual meeting via Webex.                

*Date:*                     November 13, 2024.                

*Time:*                     11:16 a.m. ET.                

## Discussion Item

### State Compliance Reviews

The ASC convened a Special Closed Meeting to discuss State Compliance Reviews pursuant to section 1104(b) of title XI (12 U.S.C. 3333(b)).

James R. Park,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2024-27110 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
1 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50568

UNITED STATES AVIATION UNDERWRITERS, INC., Manager, United States Aircraft Insurance Group, Inc., a New York Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Etc., ET AL., Defendants, RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY, a Kansas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (USDC No. 1:03-CV-26-LY)

_________________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 2 PER CURIAM: * The summary judgment of the district court is affirmed for the following

reasons: 1. There is no evidence that Raytheon as a reseller altered or modified the plane before reselling it in 1999. Under Oklahoma law, no strict liability is obtained. Allenberg v. Bentley Hedges Travel Serv., Inc. , 22 P.3d 223, 230 (Okla. 2001). 2. As for the wiring criticized by the FAA in 1991, that was how the plane was m anufactured in 1976. While Raytheon is the corporate successor of Beech Aircraft, which manufactured the plane, this liability is barred by the General Aviation Revitalization Act’s eighteen-year statute of repose. 49 U.S.C. § 40101. 3. Assuming the inverter select relay was made by Beech and installed in 1990, there is no evidence it was defective. The argument over Dr. Rhoten’s testim

ony is misplaced. Indeed, there was a fact issue on the recovery of the relay and, in any event, his testimony was certainly3 adm issible. But all he said was that he thought the inverter select relay failed. He said that he did not know why or how it failed and that he had no knowledge as to whether it was defective when it was

ma nufactured. Ahrens v. Ford Motor Co. , 340 F.3d 1142, 1145 (10th Cir. 2003) (applying Oklahoma law). 4. The claim that Raytheon failed to warn the buyer of the plane of the 1991 FAA statement about the bus wiring fails because this information was known by the plane’s pilot. Duane v. Okla. Gas & Elec. Co. , 833 P.2d 284, 287 (Okla. 1992) (“Where the danger or potentiality of danger is known or should be known to the user, the duty to warn does not attach.”). Furthermore, the change

recom me nded by the FAA would not have saved this plane where both buses failed. Gaines-Tabb v. ICI Explosives , USA, Inc. , 160 F.3d 613, 620 (10th Cir. 1998) (applying Oklahoma law) (recognizing lack of proximate cause where the causal nexus is broken). AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 680 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-345, K2025-343.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26623 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**868 KA 11-00188**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
LESTER P. IRVING, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (PATRICK J. MARTHAGE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M. Donalty, J.), rendered December 2, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of aggravated criminal contempt and assault in the third degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: November 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1104 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for pro-rated charges 

to entitlement to educational assistance under Department of Veterans 

Affairs Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program for certain licensure 

and certification tests and national tests, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana (for herself and Miss RICE of New York) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for prorated charges to entitlement to educational assistance 

under Department of Veterans Affairs Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program for certain licensure and 

certification tests and national tests, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans To Enhance 

5 Studies Through Accessibility Act’’ or the ‘‘Veterans 

6 TEST Accessibility Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1104 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHARGE TO ENTITLEMENT FOR CERTAIN LICEN2 SURE AND CERTIFICATION TESTS AND NA3 TIONAL TESTS UNDER DEPARTMENT OF VET4 ERANS AFFAIRS POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL AS5 SISTANCE PROGRAM. 

6 (a) LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION TESTS.—Sub7 section (c) of section 3315 of title 38, United States Code, 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘shall be determined’’ and all that 

9 follows through the end of such subsection and inserting 

10 ‘‘shall be pro-rated based on the actual amount of the fee 

11 charged for the test.’’. 

12 (b) NATIONAL TESTS.—Section 3315A of such title 

13 is amended— 

14 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

15 following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(3) A national test that evaluates prior learn17 ing and knowledge and provides an opportunity for 

18 course credit at an institution of higher learning as 

19 so described.’’; and 

20 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘shall be de21 termined’’ and all that follows through the end of 

22 such subsection and inserting ‘‘shall be pro-rated 

23 based on the actual amount of the fee charged for 

24 the test.’’. 

25 (c) TESTS INCLUDED.—Section 3452(b) of such title 

26 is amended in the last sentence— 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1104 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and national tests providing’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘, national tests providing’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 

4 following: ‘‘, and national tests that evaluate prior 

5 learning and knowledge and provides an opportunity 

6 for course credit at an institution of higher learn7 ing’’. 

8 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this Act shall apply to a test taken after the date that 

10 is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S349]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    AUTHORITY FOR COMMITTEES TO MEET

            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

  Mr. NELSON of Florida. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that 
the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs be authorized to 
meet during the session of the Senate on January 13, 2009 at 10 a.m. to 
conduct a committee hearing on the nomination of Mr. Shaun Donovan to 
be Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

  Mr. NELSON of Florida. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that 
the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources be authorized to meet 
during the session of the Senate to conduct a hearing on Tuesday, 
January 13, 2009, at 10 a.m., in room SD-366 of the Dirksen Senate 
Office Building. At this hearing, the Committee will consider the 
nomination of Steven Chu, to be Secretary of Energy.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                     Committee on Foreign Relations

  Mr. NELSON of Florida. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that 
the Committee on Foreign Relations be authorized to meet during the 
session of the Senate on Tuesday, January 13, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., to 
hold hearing a nomination hearing.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

  Mr. NELSON of Florida. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that 
the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions be authorized 
to meet, during the session of the Senate on January 13th, to conduct a 
hearing on the nomination of Mr. Arne Duncan, of Illinois, to be 
Secretary of Education. The hearing will commence at 10 a.m. in room 
430 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00194

- CR

J AMIE F UENTEZ R

AMIREZ

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EX

AS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the Criminal District

Court No. 3

of Tarrant County ( 1704962R )

January 18, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Br ian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
## Federal Job Safety Commission Gets Hammer Award for Simplifying Employers' "Day in Court"

 

 

 

 

**FEDERAL JOB SAFETY COMMISSION GETS HAMMER AWARD FOR SIMPLIFYING EMPLOYERS' "DAY IN COURT"**

The independent Federal agency that issues decisions in work place safety disputes will receive Vice President Albert Gore's Hammer Award for "simplifying and expediting" its decision-making by implementing a process called E-Z Trial. Pat Wood, a representative of the Vice President's National Partnership for Reinventing Government (NPR) will present the award at 10:30 a.m., November 17, 1998, at the agency's Washington, DC headquarters, 1120 20th St., N.W. NPR is the initiative lead by Vice President Gore to improve government service and efficiency. The Hammer Award recognizes Federal agencies whose work results in a government that works better and costs less.

The Review Commission, created by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, resolves disputes that start when an employer or group of employees or their union disagrees with some portion of a job safety or health citation issued by inspectors from another Federal agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).  Each such case is assigned to one of the Review Commission's Administrative Law Judges (ALJ). Before E-Z Trial, many employers or employees did not get "their day in court" because they were confused by the legal process or technical legal rules or discouraged by the cost of hiring an attorney.  With E-Z Trial, contesting a citation became simpler, quicker and less costly, especially for small employers and those appearing without attorneys.

The new process eliminates pleadings, discourages discovery and requires the disclosure to employers of certain useful information concerning the inspection and citation, without compromising due process. In addition, complex federal rules of evidence, which can confound many non-lawyers, do not apply in E-Z Trial proceedings and post-hearing briefs are discouraged in favor of oral arguments at the hearing.  In 1998, roughly 25 per cent of OSHRC's cases were E-Z Trials. Cycle times for E-Z Trials were reduced by nearly 60 per cent compared to similar cases heard under the conventional trial process.  Employers receive a step-by-step plain english guide to E-Z Trial and an explanatory videotape.