alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 69 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 

Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2017 

Ms. NORTON submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On October 6, 2017, or on such other date as the 

7 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Com8 mittee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may 

9 jointly designate, the 32d annual District of Columbia 

10 Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this 


srobinson on DSKBC5CHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 69 IH 

1 resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through 

2 the Capitol Grounds to carry the Special Olympics torch 

3 to honor local Special Olympics athletes. 

4 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

5 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

6 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

7 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA8 TIONS. 

9 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

10 for physical preparations for the event. 

11 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

12 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce13 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

14 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise15 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

16 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

17 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKBC5CHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 180 (Saturday, November 29, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10783]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           RECESS UNTIL TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2008, 10:30 A.M.

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 
Senate stands in recess until Tuesday, December 2, 2008, at 10:30 a.m.
  Thereupon, the Senate, at 2 and 30 seconds p.m., recessed until 
Tuesday, December 2, 2008, at 10:30 a.m.
```
#### State ex rel. Peters, Appellant, vs. Sleeman and others, Respondents.

*October 12*

November *9, 1938.*

*254
      *L. R. McPherson*of Superior, for the appellant.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Maynard Berg-lund,*corporation counsel of the city of Superior, and *Claude F. Cooper,*assistant corporation counsel, and oral argument by *Mr.*Berglund,

*255Rosen berry, C. J.

It is clear that the plaintiff has no right upon which he can base a demand that he be returned to his employment unless his tenure was in effect in July or August, 1937, when he made a demand that he be assigned to work in the schools. The plaintiff testified that he was familiar with and understood the rules of the board of education. These rules provide in express terms that a leave of absence shall not be given for more than one year. The plaintiff knew that the leave given him at the beginning of school July 1935-1936 expired in 1936 and he requested no leave for the year 1936-1937.

It is considered therefore that there is no basis for the plaintiff’s claim that the relationship continued to August 7, 1937, when he demanded that he be restored to his position. The plaintiff claims that the reason that he did not secure a leave of absence for the year 1936-1937 was that at the time Mr. Davies, the superintendent, was critically ill. Being-familiar with the rules of the board of education, plaintiff must be presumed to know that Mr. Davies had no power to grant leaves of absence, and while he had made his former applications to the board through Mr. Davies, he must have known there was nothing to prevent him from making like application through the secretary, the president, or any other member of the board of education who would bring it before the board. The plaintiff having allowed his contractual relationship with the school board to lapse by his failure to secure a leave of absence, the trial court correctly held that the writ of *mandamus*should not issue. The plaintiff secured no rights under the tenure act of 1937 (ch. 374, Laws of 1937) because at the time that act went into effect he was not a teacher in the schools of the city of Superior.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March

3 , 2022

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00672

- CV

JEFFREY RYAN WOOD , Appellant

V.

ANA RICKARD WOOD , Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. 2014

- 38613B

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a n order signed October 18, 202 1 . On February 14, 2022, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
We dismiss the ap peal

. PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      363282
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               299681
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 171488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1822078
<PP&E>                                      172069
<DEPRECIATION>                               84375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1909772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       473993
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                  11454871
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                               (10589630)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1909772
<SALES>                                     311408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            311408
<CGS>                                       206950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               206950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            435514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (331056)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (331056)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (331056)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.02)


</TABLE>
#### Knapp, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*February 14*

March *9, 1920.*

*Bastardy: Evidence: Sufficiency.*

In a bastardy proceeding, the evidence is *held*to support a conviction.

Error to review a judgment of the municipal court of Outagamie county: Albert M. Spencer, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by *Ryan & Cary*of Appleton, and oral argüment by *Thomas H. Ryan.*

For the defendant in error there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and /. *E. Messer schmidt,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Messerschmidt.*

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of bastardy and sued out a writ of error. His sole contention is that the judgment is not supported by the evidence. An examination of the record satisfies us that the judgment is supported by the evidence and should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 6 (Monday, January 12, 2009)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D28]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
  No committee meetings were held.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited  financial  statements of Quality  Stores,  Inc. at and for the period
ended July 29, 2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                         12,138
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,357
<INVENTORY>                                    442,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               475,866
<PP&E>                                         138,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 915,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          245,127
<BONDS>                                        434,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   915,551
<SALES>                                        331,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               331,690
<CGS>                                          231,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  70,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                15,004
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,061
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,943
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,943
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 23 Report and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Allied Capital Corporation: The audits referred to in our report dated
March 14, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Allied Capital Corporation included the related financial statement schedule
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in the annual report on
Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial
statement schedule based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein. We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-45525, No. 333-13584, No. 333-88681 and No. 333-101849) on Form S-8 of
Allied Capital Corporation of our reports dated March 14, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated
financial statements and the related financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, which reports appear in Allied Capital Corporation's
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. /s/ KPMG LLPWashington, D.C.
March 14, 2005
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. 

OSHRC Docket Nos. 16-1713, 16-1813, 

16-1872, 17-0023, 17-0279 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief the issues presented in the Secretary’s petition for 

discretionary review and Respondent’s conditional cross-petition for discretionary review. The 

parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider either the merits or 

characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.

Unless specified otherwise, all briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 

93.1

 Any brief filed shall address the petitioned issues as presented in all five cases identified 

above. Separate briefs for each case will not be accepted. The length of any brief filed may exceed 

the limits set forth in Commission Rule 93(e) by 30 pages. The times set forth in Commission 

Rule 93(b)(1) for filing any briefs are expanded as follows: 80 days for the first brief, 60 days for 

any responsive briefs, and 30 days for any reply brief. 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, 

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. 

Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
2

A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission in accordance with

Commission Rule 93. The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed in lieu of briefs) 

shall commence on the date of service.

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: September 25, 2020 _/s/_______________________________ 

 John X. Cerveny 

 Executive Secretary
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 033-05913, 033-53381, 033-27372, 333-40715, 333-55588, 333-113039, 333-113040, 333-129010, 333-143743, and 333-149007) of Analogic Corporation of our reportdated September 29, 2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston,Massachusetts 

September 29, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>       5
  <LEGEND>
  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
  Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at December 31,
  1997 (Unaudited) and the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for
  the Year Ended December 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its
  entirety by reference to such financial statements.
  
  </LEGEND>
  <MULTIPLIER>    1
         
  
  <S>                           <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1997
  <PERIOD-START>                            Jan-01-1997
  <PERIOD-END>                              Dec-31-1997
  <CASH>                                        134,096
  <SECURITIES>                                        0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                       0
  <ALLOWANCES>                                        0
  <INVENTORY>                                         0
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
  <PP&E>                                              0
  <DEPRECIATION>                                      0
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                246,462
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
  <BONDS>                                             0
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
  <PREFERRED>                                         0
  <COMMON>                                      314,080
  <OTHER-SE>                                          0
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  246,462
  <SALES>                                             0
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                              126,744
  <CGS>                                               0
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                              137,120
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,376)
  <INCOME-TAX>                                        0
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
  <DISCONTINUED>                                (10,376)
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
  <CHANGES>                                           0
  <NET-INCOME>                                  (10,376)
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.00
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.00
          
  
  
  
</TABLE>
Exhibit 3.1a

INNKEEPERS USA TRUST

AMENDMENT OF DECLARATION OF TRUST

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT:

FIRST: The Amended and
Restated Declaration of Trust, as amended (the Declaration of Trust), of Innkeepers USA Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the Company), is hereby amended by deleting Article XII in its entirety and substituting
therefor as follows:

XII.[INTENTIONALLY DELETED]

SECOND: The foregoing amendment to the Declaration of Trust of the Company has been duly approved by the shareholders of the Company by at least a
majority vote of all votes entitled to be cast as required by the Declaration of Trust.

THIRD: The undersigned acknowledges that
this amendment to be the trust act of the Company and, as to all matters or facts required to be verified under oath, the undersigned acknowledges that, to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, these matters and facts are true in all
material respects and that this statement is made under the penalties for perjury.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this
amendment to be signed in its name and on its behalf by its undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer and attested to by its Secretary on this th day of May, 2006.



INNKEEPERS USA TRUST/s/ Jeffrey H. FisherJeffrey H. FisherChief Executive Officer and President




|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Murphy
|Mark A. Murphy    
|Secretary
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

p0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

139427 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139427 

 COA: 291832 

Kalamazoo CC: 05-001647-FC 

KENDRICK LEE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 21, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
### BATCH PROCESS

DESCRIPTION

FOR NCS

BLENDING

- pl6duction

Flows NCS=New

Chemical

Substance Cleaning Flows
Unit Operation

1

# tr-llambient " I nsfer NCS to 1000 gallon mixer from 55 gallon
s or 330 gallon totes* kglbatch as NC 

# v Unit Operation

2 *330gallon totescontaining

1 kg NC returned to manufacturing site for reuse.Drums

sent to offsite

reclaimer

(contain appprox 2 kg NC total) 

# E- water added to Mixer 1. Mixed with Lightning mixer for approximately

15 minutes 2647 kgs

per batch

water added 

# l \y Unit Operation

3 

# E# 1). approximately

I% (w/w)of

total batch NaCladded s granuales

andmixed

for one hour. 2). Less

than 0.1% (w/w) of total batch weight of ry low mol.

Wt. acrylate

polymer added 

# J

Unit Operation

4 

# E+ aterial containerized

via pump

into 330 gallon caged plastic totes 550 gallon Stainless Steel Containers.

I I I I I I 

# v Unit Operation

5 Mixer l andpump

cleaned with approx

50 kgs water. Water

contains < 1 kg NC

(as t30%l and is in toteand reused

in subsequent

batch.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H202]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 SCHIP LEGISLATION IS VITAL LEGISLATION

  (Ms. SPEIER asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. SPEIER. Madam Speaker and Members, it is a remarkable day today 
because we will vote to insure 11 million American children. But the 
real question is, do we want to continue to be a third world country 
because we are the only industrialized Nation in the world that does 
not provide health care to its children.
  Twice our outgoing President has vetoed similar bills. But what is 
the cost of not providing medical coverage to our children? What is the 
cost of routine medical conditions clogging our emergency rooms? What 
is the cost of healthy children sharing classrooms and playgrounds with 
classmates afflicted with undiagnosed and untreated contagious 
diseases?
  Nearly three-quarters of the uninsured children qualify for Medicaid 
or SCHIP but are not enrolled. And with job losses, multiplying at a 
record pace, these numbers will only increase.
  I urge my colleagues to support this measure because simply put, we 
cannot afford not to.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Brent J. Santha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. Date: November 22, 2004
    
    By: /s/ Brent J. SanthaName: Brent J. Santha
Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H199]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                                 January 14, 2009.
       I hereby appoint the Honorable Ellen O. Tauscher to act as 
     Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                     Nancy Pelosi,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```