alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2024-P-4163]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 16, 2024. The document announced that NOXAFIL (posaconazole) delayed-release tablets, 100 grams (g), was not withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness. The document incorrectly listed the dosage strength as 100 g. The correct strength is 100 milligrams (mg). This notice corrects that error.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Awo Archampong-Gray, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6243, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-0110,                         *Awo.Archampong-Gray@fda.hhs.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2024-23811, published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Wednesday, October 16, 2024 (89 FR 83504), appearing on pages 83504 and 83505, the following corrections are made:                

1. On page 83504, in the second column, the title of the document is corrected to read “Determination That NOXAFIL (Posaconazole) Delayed-Release Tablets, 100 Milligrams, Was Not Withdrawn From Sale for Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness.”

                    2. On page 83504, in the third column, in the                     **SUMMARY**                    , in the first paragraph, “NOXAFIL (posaconazole) delayed-release tablets, 100 grams (g),” is corrected to read “NOXAFIL (posaconazole) delayed-release tablets, 100 milligrams (mg),”.                

3. On page 83505, in the first and second columns, all uses of “100 g” are corrected to read “100 mg”.

Dated: November 7, 2024.

Kimberlee Trzeciak,

Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Legislation, and International Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2024-27082 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**Certification of the Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)I, Morris H. Wheeler, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Cohesant Technologies Inc. (the“Company”), certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.(4) The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company andwe have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
 

 
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (theCompany’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and(5) The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the Company’s internal controls over financialreporting./s/ Morris H. WheelerMorris H. Wheeler
# C_2022224EN.01000101.xml

| 8.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2021–2022 SESSION

Sittings of 22 to 25 November 2021

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
# FIFRA Overview: Pesticide Registration November 9, 2015 Dominic Schuler U.S . Environmental Protection Agency Office of Chemical Safety & Pollution Prevention

Office of Pesticide Programs 12 

## Pesticide Product: Registration Process • Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) requires all pesticides sold or distributed in the US to be registered by EPA.
- A pesticide is any substance or mixture intended for preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating any pest.
- Legionella is a pest and any substance making claims against Legionella is a pesticide.3 

## Pesticide Product: Registration Process • Registration Process for new products:
- PRIA – fee for service.
- Active ingredients already approved for potable water can have a review time of 4 -5 mos. with few( er) data requirements.


### - Active ingredients that have not been approved for potable water can have a review time up to 15 mos. with significant 

### data requirements.
- Legionella claims require efficacy data.4



## Pesticide Devices • “any instrument or contrivance (other than a firearm) that is intended for trapping, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest or any form of plant or animal life.” • Devices are not registered, but are “regulated” by FIFRA. • Devices include ultraviolet light systems, ozone generators, water filters, etc. • Device claims cannot be false or misleading • They must be manufactured in an EPA registered establishment.

## FIFRA: State Authority • FIFRA allows states to have stricter standards than those prescribed in federal regulations.

– A state can require compliance with state -specific pesticide registration process in addition to the EPA registration. 5

# Clarification Questions

6
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E54-E55]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   ST. PETERSBURG MAYOR RICK BAKER NAMED ONE OF NATION'S OUTSTANDING 
                            PUBLIC OFFICIALS

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. C.W. BILL YOUNG

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, January 9, 2009

  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Madam Speaker, I rise to pay tribute to St. 
Petersburg Mayor Rick Baker who last November was named one of 
Governing magazine's eight public officials of the year.
  Now beginning his 8th year as mayor, Rick has brought insurmountable 
energy and passion to serving the people of St. Petersburg and 
revitalizing the entire community. His catch phrase is, ``Another great 
day in St. Petersburg,'' and under his leadership, every day has become 
another great day for our community.
  As the only mayor honored this year, the magazine dubbed Mayor Baker 
as ``Mr. Inclusive'' for his work to revitalize the city's economy, 
improve its parks system, and improve the city's schools.
  This is one of many honors Rick's hard work and commitment to public 
service have earned him and the city. Just last September, General 
Colin Powell's America's Promise Alliance named St. Petersburg one of 
our Nation's 100 Best Communities for Young People.
  During ceremonies September 22 at Union Station, the organization 
cited St. Petersburg for its effort to improve its schools by forming 
corporate sponsorships. In particular, it said, ``St. Petersburg has a 
strong backbone--the mayor--who, since 2003, has increased corporate 
partners for its schools from nine to nearly 80.''
  It was Rick Baker whose vision led to the establishment of the 
Mayor's Mentors & More program 6 years ago. With the support of the 
Pinellas Education Foundation, which funded a city staff position to 
lead mentor training, the city has trained more than 500 mentors over 
the past 2 years.
  Madam Speaker, as Rick Baker embarks upon his final year as mayor, it 
is good that he

[[Page E55]]

receives recognition for a job well done for the people of St. 
Petersburg, Florida. He and his work stand as a symbol for all that is 
good about public service and those who choose to serve.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,085-03

EX PARTE JERMAINE ANDRE GRANT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1016934-A IN THE 230 DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion in which JOHNSON, J., joined.

CONCURRING OPINION

I respectfully concur in the Court’s order that remands this pro se habeas application

to the convicting court for further development of the record. I, however, do not join the

Court’s order because it fails to accurately track the statutory language in the Code of

Criminal Procedure, in that it improperly limits an indigent pro se habeas applicant’s

entitlement to the assistance of appointed post-conviction counsel to situations involving a

hearing on remand. As I previously explained in my concurring opinion in Ex parte Pointer,

in order to comply with the statutory requirements in the Code, this Court’s order should

instead more broadly require a habeas court to appoint counsel for an indigent pro se habeas
Grant - 2

applicant whenever the court determines that the interests of justice require it. See Ex parte

Pointer, Nos. WR-84,786-01 & WR-84,786-02, 2016 WL 3193254 (Tex. Crim. App. June

8, 2016) (Alcala, J., concurring) (citing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 1.051(d)(3) (providing

that an indigent habeas applicant “is entitled to have the trial court appoint an attorney to

represent him in . . . a habeas corpus proceeding if the court concludes that the interests of

justice require representation”)). Because the Court’s order fails to track the statutory

language in the Code of Criminal Procedure by incorrectly suggesting that the habeas court’s

authority to appoint post-conviction counsel is limited to situations involving a hearing on

remand, I cannot join the Court’s order. Aside from my disagreement with the language in

this Court’s order, I otherwise respectfully concur.

Filed: June 29, 2016

Do not publish
#### Estate of Byrne: Dollard and others, Appellants, vs. Minahan and others, Respondents.

*December 3, 1929*

March *4, 1930.*

For the appellants there were briefs by *McGovern, Curtis, Devos & Reiss*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Francis E. McGovern.*

*E. D. Minahan*of Rhinelander, for the respondent Elizabeth Minahan.

*W. K. Parkinson*of Phillips, for the respondents Jane Gallet and Mary Flynn.

*77For the respondents James P. Traynor and others there was a brief by *Thompson, ■Hessian & Fletcher*of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

The following opinion was filed January 7, 1930:

Crownhart, J.

There being one vacancy, only six members of the court participated in the decision of this case. The members of the court are equally divided in opinion upon the questions presented upon this appeal. Mr. Justice Owen, Mr. Justice Stevens, and Mr. Justice Fowler are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fritz, and the writer are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Under the well established rule it follows that the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on March 30, 1930.
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on September 30, 2020 

 DOCKET 

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 17-0190 Shelly & Sands, Inc. 05/02/18 DFR 05/10/18 Closed

2 15-1574

MasTec North America 

dba MasTec Advanced 

Technologies, Inc.

06/20/18 DFR 07/10/18 Closed

3 17-0949 Walmart, Inc. 07/12/18 DFR 08/09/18 Closed

4 17-1214 Mansfield Industrial, Inc. 11/23/18 DFR 01/03/19 Closed

5 17-0483 Ceco Concrete 

Construction, LLC 11/28/18 DFR 12/19/18 Closed

6 16-1628 Schaad Detective 

Agency, Inc. 12/18/18 DFR 01/07/19 Closed

7 17-2144 Tampa Electric Co. 04/09/19 DFR 04/23/19 Closed

 8 18-0034

Armstrong Utilities, 

Inc. d/b/a Armstrong 

Cable Services

10/15/19 DFR 10/24/19 Closed

 9 17-0138 Home Rubber 

Company, LP 10/22/19 DFR 11/04/19 Closed

10 18-0970 FreightCar America, 

Inc. 10/28/19 DFR 11/04/19 Closed

11 18-0758 RoadSafe Traffic 

Systems, Inc. 10/30/19 DFR 11/01/19 Closed

12 17-1894 Maxim Crane Works 02/06/20 DFR 02/14/20 Closed

13 17-0737

UHS of Westwood 

Pembroke, Inc.

UHS of Delaware, Inc.

03/19/20 DFR 03/25/20 Closed

14 19-0593 StormForce of 

Jacksonville, LLC 06/04/20 DFR 07/28/20 Open

15 18-0068 Roy Rock, LLC 08/21/20 DFR 08/28/20 Open

16 18-1451 Summit Contracting 

Group, Inc. 08/24/20 DFR 09/25/20 Open

17 16-1713 United States Postal 

Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Open

18 16-1813 United States Postal 

Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Open

19 16-1872 United States Postal 

Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Open

20 17-0023 United States Postal 

Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Open

21 17-0279 United States Postal 

Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Open

22 20-0623 Petsmart, Inc. 09/24/20 DFR
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on September 30, 2020 

 DOCKET 

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

23 20-0528

Burlington Capital 

PM Group, Inc. 

d/b/a Post Woods 

Apartment Homes

09/25/20 DFR

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GARRETT KIRBY LAFROMBOISE, Defendant - Appellant. No. 14-30082 D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00116-BMM-1 MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 27, 2015 ** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. Garrett Kirby LaFromboise appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his 160-month sentence for assau lt resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a), 113(a)(6), and 3559(f)(3). 

# FILED JUL 29 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), LaFromboise’s counsel has filed a brief stating that th ere are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of reco rd. We have provided LaFromboise the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED . AFFIRMED .

2
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 22,
1997 (February 19, 1997 as to Note 2) on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of American Filtrona Corporation and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
in the registration statements on Form S-8, pertaining to the American Filtrona
Corporation 1988 Stock Option Plan and the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan.




                                              /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Richmond, Virginia
March 27, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
unaudited  consolidated  balance sheet of AT&T Corp. at September 30, 1998,  and
the unaudited  consolidated  statement of income for the nine-month period ended
September  30,  1998,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such
financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         4,190
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,029
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,563
<PP&E>                                         49,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                 24,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 58,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,723
<BONDS>                                        6,079
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,631
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   58,318
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               39,695
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  35,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,050
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,148
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,901
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,247
<DISCONTINUED>                                 1,300
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (137)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,410
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.62


</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131350 & (23) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 131350 

 COA: 266135 
 Wayne CC: 86-006461-FY

TERRY LYNN COOPER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of 

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
TRANSAMERICAN ENERGY CORPORATION'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AT OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          49,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,764
<PP&E>                                       2,879,715
<DEPRECIATION>                                 916,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,166,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,337
<BONDS>                                      1,870,481
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (65,964) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,166,504
<SALES>                                        133,782 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               208,399
<CGS>                                           66,821 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  377,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (233,412)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (38,882)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (194,530) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,436)
<CHANGES>                                        2,674
<NET-INCOME>                                  (159,130)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (17,681)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (17,681)
        

</TABLE>