alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 83 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 

for the unveiling of the American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action 

(POW/MIA) Chair of Honor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2017 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Ms. BORDALLO, Ms. CLARK

of Massachusetts, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. DONOVAN, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, 

Mr. JONES, Mr. KEATING, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. LANCE, Mr. 

LOEBSACK, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. ROE of 

Tennessee, Mr. ROUZER, and Mrs. WALORSKI) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for the unveiling of the American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) Chair of 

Honor. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 83 IH 

1 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR UNVEILING 

2 OF AMERICAN PRISONERS OF WAR/MISSING 

3 IN ACTION (POW/MIA) CHAIR OF HONOR. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

5 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used for an 

6 event on November 8, 2017, to unveil the American Pris7 oners of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) Chair of 

8 Honor. 

9 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

10 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 

11 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

12 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation 
by reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 26, 1999 included in
American Home Products Corporation's (the Company) Annual Report to Shareholders
for the year ended December 31, 1998. Furthermore, we consent to the
incorporation of our reports dated January 26, 1999 included in or made part of
this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-45324 and 33-57339) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-96127,
33-24068, 33-41434, 33-53733, 33-55449, 33-45970, 33-14458, 33-50149, 33-55456
and 333-15509).




                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP





New York, N.Y.
March 29, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1164 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1164

   To condition assistance to the West Bank and Gaza on steps by the 
  Palestinian Authority to end violence and terrorism against Israeli 
                               citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2017

Mr. Lamborn (for himself and Mr. Zeldin) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To condition assistance to the West Bank and Gaza on steps by the 
  Palestinian Authority to end violence and terrorism against Israeli 
                               citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taylor Force Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ASSISTANCE TO THE WEST BANK AND GAZA.

    Funds appropriated or otherwise made available for assistance under 
chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2346 et seq.; relating to the Economic Support Fund) and available for 
assistance for the West Bank and Gaza may only be made available for 
such purpose if the Secretary of State certifies to the appropriate 
congressional committees that the Palestinian Authority--
            (1) is taking credible steps to end acts of violence 
        against United States and Israeli citizens that are perpetrated 
        by individuals under its jurisdictional control, such as the 
        March 2016 attack that killed former United States Army officer 
        Taylor Force, a veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan;
            (2) is publicly condemning such acts of violence and is 
        taking steps to investigate or is cooperating in investigations 
        of such acts to bring the perpetrators to justice; and
            (3) has terminated payments for acts of terrorism against 
        United States and Israeli citizens to any individual who has 
        been imprisoned after being fairly tried and convicted for such 
        acts of terrorism and to any individual who died committing 
        such acts of terrorism, including to a family member of such 
        individuals.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
means--
            (1) the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on 
        Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
            (2) the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on 
        Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1177 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to release on behalf 

of the United States the condition that certain lands 

conveyed to the City of Old Town, Maine, be used for 

a municipal airport, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1177 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Outdated 

3 Restrictions to Allow for Job Growth Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST. 

5 (a) RELEASE.—Notwithstanding section 32(c) of the 

6 Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act (7 U.S.C. 1011(c)), if 

7 the City of Old Town, Maine, makes a written request to 

8 the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary shall release, 

9 convey, and quitclaim, without monetary consideration, all 

10 rights, title, and interest of the United States in and to 

11 the lands specified in subsection (b). 

12 (b) LANDS SPECIFIED.—The lands subject to sub13 section (a) include only the lands— 

14 (1) conveyed by the United States to the City 

15 of Old Town, Maine, under section 32(c) of the 

16 Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act (7 U.S.C. 

17 1011(c)) by the deed dated June 5, 1941; 

18 (2) proposed for conveyance by the City of Old 

19 Town, Maine, for the purpose of economic develop20 ment; and 
3 

•HR 1177 EH

1 (3) described in the written request submitted 

2 by the City of Old Town, Maine, to the Secretary of 

3 Agriculture pursuant to subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1177 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to release on 

other purposes. Maine, be used for a municipal airport, and for certain lands conveyed to the City of Old Town, behalf of the United States the condition that
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for August 2016

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 30

2. Cases Added to Docket 0

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket -0

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 30
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Matthew D. Osburn, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Schlotzsky’s, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 11, 2004      By: /s/ MATTHEW D. OSBURN       Matthew D. Osburn   Vice President and Controller   (Principal Financial Officer)
No. 86-629.

#### Seattle Master Builders Assn. et al. *v.*Pacific Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Planning Council et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1551-09

OSCAR RENE BENAVIDEZ, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HIDALGO COUNTY

HERVEY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which KELLER, P.J., joined. 

DISSENTING OPINION

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the Court’s decision that “the court of appeals was not

justified in ordering the entry of an acquittal.” Maj. op. at 6. I also agree with the Court’s decision

that this case should be remanded to the court of appeals. Maj. op. at 9. I believe that the Court

should, however, simply remand this case to the court of appeals for further proceedings not

inconsistent with its opinion.

I respectfully dissent.

Hervey, J.

Filed: October 20, 2010

Publish
OFFICE OFTHEATT'ORNEY GENERAL OFAUSTlN 

Eon0rcbla roatsr flarir 

couaty Attorney 

~oaa-4 oeuuty 

crow;011, TomIs 

0ear Sir; QpiniBn PO. Q4lb7 

Ror County bar no authorit to nrW= 

t6tn and keep Up a ptibllo oaaatrry. 
ty Of the CUOW~~ CSZWItsF7 AS606i6tiOAe Ma t0 biad the OfJUIIty 

for the Upka6&l 9Jta ~61CtW6666 thermi. 

Your8 very truly
----

|                             |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)     | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended  September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |

|                             |                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|                         |                                       |        |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  November 5, 2010 | /s/ William J. Fehrman                |   |
|                    | William J. Fehrman                    |   |
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    | (principal executive officer)         |   |
DLD
- 180 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11

- 1802

___________ IN RE: JOHNNIE DELANTRO YOUNG,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Related to E.D. Pa. Civ. No

. 10

- cv - 06112)

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

May 5, 2011 Before: BARRY, FISHER and ROTH, Circuit Judges

.

(Opinion f

iled : July 22, 2011 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM Johnnie Delantro Young has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to provide him with “the court docke t statements and the court documents [from his underlying habeas case] . . . without fee payment.” For the following reasons, we will deny the petition. In November 2010, Young filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a 2008 controlled substance conviction in the Court of Common Pleas of2

Lancaster County . The matter was referred to a Magistrate Judge, who directed the District Attorney of Lancaster County to respond to the petition. Meanwhile, Young requested that the District Court fu rnish him with “the court docket and documents.” A Deputy Clerk informed Young that there was a 30

- cent fee for the information he requested, that the records could not be sent until the fee was received, and that the documents could not be provided free of charge without a specific order from the judge. Young now asks us to direct the District Court Clerk to provide him with copies of the documents he seeks. 1 Issuance of a writ of mandamus is an appropriate remedy in extraordinary circumstances only. S ee Sporck v. Peil , 759 F.2d 312, 314 (3d Cir. 1985). Its main purpose is “ to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do so.” Roche v. Evaporated
Milk A ss’ n , 319 U.S. 21, 26 (1943). To justify the Court’ s use of this remedy, a petitioner must demonstrate that “ there are no other adequate means of relief and the right to the writ is clear and indisputable.” First Jersey Sec., Inc. v. Bergen , 6 05 F.2d 690 , 700 (3d Cir. 1979). Young’s petition does not meet these requirements. Indeed, he can obtain the requested documents by paying the requisite fee. See Electronic Public Access Fee Schedule (re printed with 28 U.S.C. § 1914 ). Nevertheless, as a courtes y in this

1 Other than the “docke t statement,” which we believe refers to the District Court docket report, Young has not identified the court documents that he wants.3

instance, t he Clerk of this Court is hereby directed to provide to Young , without charge, one (1) copy of the District Court docket report. For the foregoing reasons, Young’s petition for a writ of mandamus will be denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S239]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. SHAWN NICHOLAS FREEMORE, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 131 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 2nd day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED . The Petition to Withdraw as Counsel is GRANTED
.
#### Nebraska Seed Company and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and another, Respondents.

*November 1*0

December *8, 1931.*

*201For the appellants there was a brief by *Stephens, Sletteland & Sutherland,*and oral argument by *Leon E. Isaacson,*all of Madison.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general, and *Fisher, Cashin & Reinholdt*of Stevens Point for the respondent Lena Anderson, and oral argument by *Mr. Levitan.*

Fairchild, J.

The judgment in the circuit court confirmed the finding of the Industrial Commission that Fred Anderson’s death was due to a hazard peculiar to and arising out of his employment.

The deceased was in the employ of the appellant. On the day of his death and while his day’s work was not yet completed, he, with others similarly employed, sought shelter for himself and team from a thunder storm. The building into which he entered was so situated, and its height above the surrounding surface was such, as to increase the danger from lightning. It all resulted in an unusual risk of such an accident incidental to the employment.

The evidence sustains the findings and warrants the conclusion that the death of Anderson resulted from a hazard substantially increased by reason of his employment, and it follows the judgment must be affirmed. *Newman v. Industrial Comm.*203 Wis. 358, 234 N. W. 495; *Madura v. New York,*238 N. Y. 214, 144 N. E. 505.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
----

----

| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period      ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                          |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |

| Date:  November 7,      2008 | /s/ Thomas B.      Specketer       |   |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                        | Thomas      B. Specketer           |   |
|                                        | Vice      President and Controller |   |
|                                        | (principal      financial officer) |   |

----

----
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

p0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

139427

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139427 COA: 291832 Kalamazoo CC: 05-001647-FC KENDRICK LEE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 21, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  “Report”), I, Stephen C. Donnelly, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ Stephen C. Donnelly
| |  |                        
| |  | Stephen C. Donnelly    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer

November
  30, 2006



---