alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Senior Airman NICHOLAS G. ELWELL

United States Air Force

ACM S32285

4 August 2015

Sentence adjudged 7 November 2014 by SP CM convened at Joint Base

Langley

- Eustis, Virginia . Military Judge: Jeremy S. Weber (sitting alone).

Approved S entence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 30 days , and

reduction to E

- 2

.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Joy L. Primoli

.

Appellate Counsel for the United Sta tes: Colonel Katherine E. Oler.

Before

ALLRED, TELLER, and DUBRISKE

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent

under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4

.



### PER CURIAM :

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occ urred. Article 66(c),

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed , 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000).

Accor dingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

STEVEN LUCAS

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, N. Scott Gillis, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)of First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First SunAmerica Life InsuranceCompany;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 8, 2005   /s/ N. SCOTT GILLIS   N. Scott Gillis  Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LOUDLE JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Indenture Trustee 

of the Aames Mortgage Investment Trust 2005-1

Appellee.

No. 4D18-39

[November 1, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael L. Gates, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE17015454.

Loudle Jackson, Mirimar, pro se.

Kimbery S. Mello and Joseph H. Picone of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., 

Tampa, and C. Wade Bowden and Tyrone A. Adras of Greenberg Traurig, 

P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 2 8 , 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00769

- CV

Brenda Dickerson, Appellant

v.

Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAM SON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND ROSE

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judg ment signed by the tr i a l court on November 8, 2013. Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that Brenda Dickerson has not prosecuted her appeal and

did not comply with a notice from the clerk of this C ourt. T he appeal is thus subject to

dismissal. T herefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### Carter v. Washington and Others.

Monday, March 16, 1806.

Injunction — Death of Party — Revival—Dissolution.*— where the complainant in a bill of injunction dies; after answer filed, and before a decision of the cause, an order may be obtained, on the motion of the' defendant, that, unless the representatives of the complainant shall appear, within a certain time fixed by the Court, and cause the suit to be revived in their names, the injunction shall stand dissolved.

*

See the principal case approved in Kenner v. Hord, 1 Hen. &M. 204. See generally, monographic *note*on “Injunctions” appended to Claytor v. Anthony, 15 Gratt. 518.

The complainant obtained an injunction, in this Court, to stay waste. After the answer of the defendants had come in, and the cause was set down for hearing, the complainant died.

Botts, for the defendants, stated that the representatives of the complainant were numerous, much dispersed, and not .well known ; and that it would be difficult, if not ’^impossible, to trace their persons, rights, or residence, so as to serve any order of Court upon them. He therefore moved that an order might be entered, that, unless the representatives of the complainant should come in, before the end of the next term, and cause the suit to be revived in their names, the injunction to stay waste should stand dissolved,(a) as an act of this day.

Which motion was granted accordingly..

(a)

 See 2 Eg. Ca. Abr. 2, note (a) in margin.
#### JAMES I MOORE and others v. RICHARD D. JONES and others.

*Restraining order -- Bond.*

Upon the granting of an order restraining certain persons from exercising the duties of certain county offices to which they had been declared elected by the Board of County, Commissioners; *Meld,*not to be error to require from the plaintiffs a bond for costs, damages, &c.

Appeal from an Order made at Chambers in Eranklinton on the 14th day of December, 1876, by *Watts, J.*

Upon granting the restraining order as stated in the preceding case Ilis Honor also required the plaintiffs to execute *190a bond for costs, damages, &e. to the defendants, from •which the plaintiffs appealed.

*Messrs. Merrimon, Fuller § Ashe*and *T B. Venable,*for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. L. G. Edwards*and *J. B. Batchelor,*for defendants.

Pearson, C. J.

Inasmuch as the plaintiffs were advised to include Crews and the other persons, who held the certificate of election made by the “ Board of Commissioners” in the summons, and to ask for a restraining order and injunction, they have no ground to complain of the order requiring them to give bond, which His Honor, after he found that the proceeding would be protracted for some time, thought v it to be his duty to make. ■

No error. •

Per Curiam. - Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 439 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-306, K2025-304.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26569 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000059440
<NAME> BROOKE GROUP LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                       930
<INVENTORY>                                     52,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,707
<PP&E>                                          61,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          182,564
<BONDS>                                        341,506
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,850
<OTHER-SE>                                    (446,425)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,254
<SALES>                                         80,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,005
<CGS>                                           41,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,557
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                       744
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,857
<DISCONTINUED>                                     363
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,220
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
        

</TABLE>
$3,790,520.99                                       32 Avenue of the Americas
                                                    New York, New York  10013
                                                    December 21, 2000



                  For value  received I, David Dorman,  promise to pay on demand
to the order of AT&T Corp. (AT&T) at AT&T Corporate  Headquarters,  32 Avenue of
the Americas,  New York, New York 10013, the sum of three million, seven hundred
ninety   thousand,   five  hundred,   twenty  dollars  and   ninety-nine   cents
($3,790,520.99).  I understand that the interest for any month in which there is
an unpaid  balance  shall be imputed  to me as  additional  compensation  at the
applicable  Federal  short-term  rate in effect for such month as established by
the Internal  Revenue  Service,  under Section  1274(d) of the Internal  Revenue
Code. If demand has not been made earlier,  the full amount of unpaid  principal
shall  immediately  become due and payable on the earliest of December 31, 2002,
my death or any termination of my employment.

Following  my death or other  termination  of  employment,  AT&T shall apply the
following  payments  related to my employment,  less any amounts  required to be
withheld for FICA, and for federal,  state and local income taxes, to the unpaid
principal:

                  Payments of compensation,  including but not limited to salary
                  and vacation pay unpaid as of my  termination  of  employment,
                  non-qualified  deferred  compensation,  Long  Term and  Annual
                  Incentive Awards, and severance benefits.

I shall continue to be obligated for any unpaid principal that remains after the
applications of such payments.

                             /s/ David Dorman           December 21, 2000
                             --------------------       -----------------
                             David Dorman               Date




Witnessed by:     /s/ Marie Miller          December 21, 2000
                  ------------------        ------------------
                  Marie Miller              Date
January 13, 2009 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H197 

OFFERED BY MR. RANGEL

The provisions that warranted a referral to 

the Committee on Ways and Means, in H.R. 

384, the TARP Reform and Accountability 

Act, do not contain any congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff 

benefits as defined in clause 9(d), 9(e), or 9(f) 

of Rule XXI. 

OFFERED BY MR. CONYERS

The provisions that warranted a referral to 

the Committee on the Judiciary, in H.R. 384, 

the TARP Reform and Accountability Act, 

do not contain any congressional earmarks, 

limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in clause 9(d), 9(e), or 9(f) of 

Rule XXI. 

DELETIONS OF SPONSORS FROM 

PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS 

Under clause 7 of rule XII, sponsors 

were deleted from public bills and resolutions as follows: 

H.R. 226: Mr. THOMPSON of California. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with HOUSE
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Please post this proposal from Gulfstream International Airlines in DOT-OST-2000-7881.  Call Kevin at x63176 if you have any questions.
Exhibit 12
CENTRAL TRACTOR FARM & COUNTRY, INC.
Schedule Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(In thousands except ratios)



                                        Three months ended    Three months ended
                                            May 1, 1999           May 2, 1998
                                        ------------------    ------------------


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                           $ 5,475                $ 5,514
  Portion of rent expense
    representing interest                        805                    742
                                             -------                -------
                                               6,280                  6,256
                                             =======                =======



Earnings:
  Income before income taxes                   2,422                  2,654
  Fixed charges                                6,280                  6,256
                                             -------                -------
                                             $ 8,702                $ 8,910
                                             =======                =======


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              1.4x                   1.4x
                                             =======                =======

                                          Six months ended     Six months ended
                                            May 1, 1999           May 2, 1998
                                          ----------------     ----------------


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                           $10,434                $10,798
  Portion of rent expense
    representing interest                      1,520                  1,497
                                             -------                -------
                                              11,954                 12,295
                                             =======                =======



Earnings:
  Income before income taxes                   5,376                  4,028
  Fixed charges                               11,954                 12,295
                                             -------                -------
                                             $17,330                $16,323
                                             =======                =======


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              1.4x                   1.3x
                                             =======                =======
DISTRIC T 3 3 BONNEVILL E COUNT

Y HOM E ADDRES S 263 8 BELLI N CIRCL E IDAh O FALLS . IDAH O 6340 2 bmdBvisObmdlsw.nfl t (non-wtvion ) bmdttvisOsenate.idaho.oo m (awMron ) 

# Idah o Stat e Senat e SENATO R BAR T M . DAVI S

MAJORIT Y LEADE R :~()() 0 •I E nuunco o STATE CAPITO L P.O . BO X 8372 0 BOISE , IDAH O B3720-008 1 (208)332-130 0 FAX : (208 ) 334-232 0

.'•'^'J - '^y^ -

C D October 5,201 0

Th e Honorabl e Ray LaHoo d Secretar y o f Transportatio n U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n 40 0 7 * Street

S.W . Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Development

Grant Progra m Dea r Secretar y LaHood : Pleas e allo w m e t o joi n m y voic e wit

h other s i n suppor t o f grant fund s under

th e Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Development

Grant Progra msubmitte db y th e cit

y o f Idah o Falls . A s a legislator tha t live s i n eastern Idah o wit

h ou r Capito l i n southwes t

Idaho , I personall y understan d th e importanc e o f

asubstantial an dreliabl e air carrier betwee n th e cit

y o f Idah o Fall s an dBoise . Idah o Fall s i s m

y home town . Additionally , th e Idah o National Laborator y an dother busines s an

dgovernmenta

l interest s i

n Southeas t

Idah o depen dupo n reliabl e ai r carrier s betwee

n thes e tw o cities . Simply stated , Idah o Fall s ha s go t t o hav e a n airlin e committe dt o ai r

servic e between ou

r tw o communities . I t i s m y understandin g tha

t th e cit y o f Idah o Fall s ha s air

carrie r option s tha

t the y woul d lik e t o pursue . Th e benefit s o f th e grant applicatio n woul db e t o provid e sufficien t incentive s to encourag e th e initiatio n an dcontinuatio n o f servic e betwee n thes e tw o important communitie s i

n ou r state .S10-|()l()|2-(i( W

Th e Honorabl e Ray LaHoo d Re : Gran t Progra m Pag e No , 2 I strongl y suppor

t th e applicatio n fromth e Idah o Fall s Regiona l Airpor t fo r th e grant funds an durg e your

positiv e consideratio n o f

th e same . Pleas e call i f

yo u hav e questions .

Si n

BMDtt c
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 84 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Transportation 

relating to ‘‘Metropolitan Planning Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2017 

Mr. LEWIS of Minnesota submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Transportation relating to ‘‘Metropolitan Planning Organization Coordination and Planning 

Area Reform’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Transportation relating to ‘‘Metropolitan 

5 Planning Organization Coordination and Planning Area 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 84 IH 

1 Reform’’ (81 Fed. Reg. 93448 (December 20, 2016)), and 

2 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
AMENDMENT NO


Exhibit 10.11


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 is entered into as of May 7, 2020 (“Amendment No. 1”), and is intended to be, and shall constitute an amendment to the Employment Agreement dated January 15, 2019 (“Agreement”), by and between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. (“GCEH” or “Company”), and Noah Verleun (hereinafter, “Employee,” and collectively with the Company, the “Parties”). 

 

WHEREAS, Employee has been promoted to “Executive Vice President”; and;

 

WHEREAS, in connection with his promotion, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein to increase the base salary payable to Employee;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.Section 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

 

“2.1Base Salary.  For the duration of the Term, for all services rendered by Employee hereunder and all covenants and conditions undertaken by the Parties pursuant to this Agreement, the Company shall pay, and Employee shall accept, as compensation, an annual base salary (“Base Salary”) of $310,000.  The Base Salary shall be payable in regular installments in accordance with the normal payroll practices of the Company, in effect from time to time, but in any event no less frequently than on a monthly basis.” 

 

2.All other terms and conditions of the Agreement, except as modified by this Amendment No. 1, shall remain in full force and effect. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Employee have executed this Amendment No. 1 effective as of the date specified above. 

	 

	GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.

 

 

By:/s/ RICHARD PALMER  

Name:  Richard Palmer

Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

 


	 

	EXECUTIVE

 

 

/s/ NOAH VERLEUN  

Noah Verleun

 





 



    		1