3-sided shed

Dryer 

screens Fabric filter Total

PM testing 

(initial/every 5 

years)

Semi-annual 

baghouse 

inspection

Annual 

Opacity 

(method 9)

Weekly 

visual 

inspection

Annualized 3-

sided Shed

Annualized 

Dryer screens

Annualized 

Fabric Filter Total

6A

Greenfield GE w/capacity > 

DD cutoffs due only to 

permanent storage

 NA, sheds 

constructed for 

DD already 

 NA, Dryer 

screens added 

for DD already 

 NA, FF applied for 

DD 

 Initial testing 

attritbuted to DD. 

No Dda costs. 

Retesting outside of 

60 months. 

 Assumes avg of 3 

FF's per GE 

 Based on # of 

affected facilities 

 Based on # of 

affected 

facilities 

 NA, sheds 

constructed for 

DD already 

 NA, Dryer screens 

added for DD 

already 

 None estimated 

All ER due to DD 

requirements

6B

Greenfield GE w/capacity > 

DD cutoffs due to adding TSF 

capacity

 Costed for TSF 

and permanent 

area 

 Dryer screens 

added due to 

TSF cap. 

 Assumed 3 new FF 

would be needed 

 Based on Survey, 

avg of 3 FF for each 

GE. Initial testing 

due to TSF; no cost 

for re-test because 

outside 60 month 

 Assumes avg of 3 

FF's per GE 

 Based on # of 

affected facilities 

 Based on # of 

affected 

facilities 

 Costed for TSF 

and permanent 

area 

 Dryer screens 

added due to TSF 

cap. 

 Assumed 3 new FF 

would be needed 

ER due to controlling 

dryers, and ER in grain 

handling and truck 

unloading from TSF 

grain

7

Existing GE w/capacity < DD 

cutoffs, but then adds TSF 

capacity and exceed cutoffs

 Costed for TSF 

area 

 Not costed. 

Dryer is not 

affected 

facility. 

 NA, grain handling 

and truck unloading 

are only affected 

facilities. Assume 

existing FF could be 

used. 

 Assumed FF 

associated with TSF 

unloading and grain 

handling would 

need to be tested. 

Due to Dda 

requirements. No 

cost for re-test 

because outside 60 

months. 

 Assumes at least 

1 FF at affected 

facilities 

associated with 

TSF would be 

affected. 

 Based on # of 

affected facilities 

 Based on # of 

affected 

facilities 

 Costed for TSF 

area 

 Not costed. Dryer 

is not affected 

facility. 

 NA, grain handling 

and truck unloading 

are only affected 

facilities. Assume 

existing FF could be 

used. 

Affected facility is only 

TSF unloading station 

and grain handling. 

Assumes existing FF 

could be used. ER in 

grain handling and 

truck unloading from 

TSF grain

8

Existing GE w/capacity <DD 

cutoffs, but then adds 

permanent storage capacity 

and exceed cutoffs

 NA, Shed would 

be constructed 

for DD 

 NA, Dryer 

screens added 

for DD already 

 NA, FF would be 

used for DD 

 Initial testing 

attritbuted to DD. 

No Dda costs. 

Retesting outside of 

60 months. 

 Assumes at least 

1 FF at each 

affected facility 

at each GE would 

be affected and 

require 

inspection 

 Based on # of 

affected facilities 

 Based on # of 

affected 

facilities 

 NA, Shed would 

be constructed 

for DD 

 NA, Dryer screens 

added for DD 

already 

 NA, FF would be 

used for DD 

All ER due to DD 

requirements

9

Existing GE w/capacity >DD 

cutoffs, but then adds 

permanent storage capacity 

 NA, Shed would 

be constructed 

for DD 

 NA, Dryer 

screens added 

for DD already 

 NA, FF would be 

used for DD 

 Initial testing 

attritbuted to DD. 

No Dda costs. 

Retesting outside of 

60 months. 

 Assumes at least 

2 FF at each 

affected facility 

at each GE would 

be affected and 

require 

inspection 

 Based on # of 

affected facilities 

 Based on # of 

affected 

facilities 

 NA, Shed would 

be constructed 

for DD 

 NA, Dryer screens 

added for DD 

already 

 NA, FF would be 

used for DD 

All ER due to DD 

requirements

10

Existing GE w/capacity >DD 

cutoffs, but then adds TSF 

capacity

 Added Shed cost 

for TSF truck 

unloading 

 NA, Dryer 

screens added 

for DD already 

 NA, assumed grain 

handling would use 

existing FF and truck 

unloading could be 

tied to existing FF. 

 Initial testing 

attritbuted to DD. 

No Dda costs. 

Retesting outside of 

60 months. 

 Assumes at least 

2 FF at each 

affected facility 

at each GE would 

be affected and 

require 

inspection 

 Based on # of 

affected facilities 

 Based on # of 

affected 

facilities 

 Added Shed cost 

for TSF truck 

unloading 

 NA, Dryer screens 

added for DD 

already 

 NA, assumed grain 

handling would use 

existing FF and truck 

unloading could be 

tied to existing FF. 

Affected facility is only 

TSF unloading station 

and grain handling. 

Assumes existing FF 

could be used. ER in 

grain handling and 

truck unloading from 

TSF grain

11

Existing GE w/capacity> DD 

cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction

 NA Not estimated None estimated Initial testing 

attritbuted to DD. 

No Dda costs. 

Retesting outside of 

60 months. 

 Assumes all 

modifications 

would result in 

bag inspection. 

Overestimates 

Cost because not 

all will be 

affected. 

 Based on # of 

affected 

facilities. 

Potentially 

overestimates 

costs. 

 Based on # of 

affected 

facilities 

 NA Not estimated None estimated 

Assumed no 

reductions

Scenario Description

Capital Costs ($) Annual Costs ($/yr)

PM-10 Emission 

Reductions 

(tons/year)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total

# Affected GE's # Affected GE's # Affected GE's # Affected GE's # Affected GE's # Affected GE's

6

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 1 1 1 3

6A

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due only to permanent 

storage 1 1 2

6B

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due to adding TSF 

capacity 1 1

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs 1 1 1 1 1 5

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs 1 1 1 1 1 5

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 2 2 2 2 2 10

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity 2 2 2 2 2 10

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction 18 18 18 18 18 88

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

# Affected GE's # Affected GE's # Affected GE's # Affected GE's # Affected GE's

6

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 1 1 2 3 3

6A

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due only to permanent 

storage 1 1 1 2 2

6B

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due to adding TSF 

capacity 0 0 1 1 1

Scenario Description

Number of Grain Elevators Affected in Each Year For Each Scenario

Cumulative Number of Grain Elevators Affected in Each Year For Each Scenario

Scenario Description
7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs

12345

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs

12345

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 

2468 10

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

2468 10

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction 18 35 53 70 88
 % of GE with 

Modification

s to Affected 

Faciliites 

6 6A 6B 7 8 9 10 11

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD 

cutoffs

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD 

cutoffs due only 

to permanent 

storage

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD 

cutoffs due to 

adding TSF 

capacity

Existing GE 

w/capacity < DD 

cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity 

and exceed 

cutoffs

Existing GE 

w/capacity <DD 

cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent 

storage capacity 

and exceed 

cutoffs

Existing GE 

w/capacity >DD 

cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent 

storage capacity 

Existing GE 

w/capacity >DD 

cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

Existing GE 

w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, 

and does 

modification 

or 

reconstruction

Grain Handling 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 25%

Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0 10%

Rack 1.5 1.5 1.5 0 0 0 0 15%

Truck Unloading 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 15%

Truck Loading 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 1 1 1 10%

Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0 2%

Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0 5%

Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0 5%

Railcar Unloading 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 10%

Railcar Loading 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 15%

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Number of Affected Facilites per Grain Elevator in Each Scenario

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenarios



Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Grain Handling 4 4 4 8 8 Grain Handling 4 0 0 4 0

Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0 Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0

Rack 1.5 1.5 1.5 3 3 Rack 1.5 0 0 1.5 0

Truck Unloading 2 2 2 4 4 Truck Unloading 2 0 0 2 0

Truck Loading 1.5 1.5 1.5 3 3 Truck Loading 1.5 0 0 1.5 0

Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0 Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0

Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0 Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0

Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0 Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Unloading 1 1 1 2 2 Railcar Unloading 1 0 0 1 0

Railcar Loading 1 1 1 2 2 Railcar Loading 1 0 0 1 0

Total 11 11 11 22 22 Total 11 0 0 11 0

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Grain Handling 0 0 4 4 4 Grain Handling 0 0 4 0 0

Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0 Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0

Rack 0 0 1.5 1.5 1.5 Rack 0 0 1.5 0 0

Truck Unloading 0 0 2 2 2 Truck Unloading 0 0 2 0 0

Truck Loading 0 0 1.5 1.5 1.5 Truck Loading 0 0 1.5 0 0

Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0 Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0

Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0 Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0

Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0 Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Unloading 0 0 1 1 1 Railcar Unloading 0 0 1 0 0

Railcar Loading 0 0 1 1 1 Railcar Loading 0 0 1 0 0

Total 0 0 11 11 11 Total 0 0 11 0 0

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Grain Handling 1 2 3 4 5 Grain Handling 1 1 1 1 1

Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0 Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0

Rack 0 0 0 0 0 Rack 0 0 0 0 0

Truck Unloading 1 2 3 4 5 Truck Unloading 1 1 1 1 1

Truck Loading 1 2 3 4 5 Truck Loading 1 1 1 1 1

Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0 Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0

Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0 Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0

Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0 Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Unloading 0 0 0 0 0 Railcar Unloading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Loading 0 0 0 0 0 Railcar Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3 6 9 12 15 Total 3 3 3 3 3

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Grain Handling 1 2 3 4 5 Grain Handling 1 1 1 1 1

Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0 Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0

Rack 0 0 0 0 0 Rack 0 0 0 0 0

Truck Unloading 1 2 3 4 5 Truck Unloading 1 1 1 1 1

Truck Loading 1 2 3 4 5 Truck Loading 1 1 1 1 1

Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0 Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0

Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0 Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0

Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0 Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Unloading 0 0 0 0 0 Railcar Unloading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Loading 0 0 0 0 0 Railcar Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3 6 9 12 15 Total 3 3 3 3 3

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Grain Handling 2 4 6 8 10 Grain Handling 2 2 2 2 2

Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0 Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0

Rack 0 0 0 0 0 Rack 0 0 0 0 0

Truck Unloading 2 4 6 8 10 Truck Unloading 2 2 2 2 2

Truck Loading 2 4 6 8 10 Truck Loading 2 2 2 2 2

Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0 Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0

Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0 Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0

Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0 Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Unloading 0 0 0 0 0 Railcar Unloading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Loading 0 0 0 0 0 Railcar Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Total 6 12 18 24 30 Total 6 6 6 6 6

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Grain Handling 2 4 6 8 10 Grain Handling 2 2 2 2 2

Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0 Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0

Rack 0 0 0 0 0 Rack 0 0 0 0 0

Truck Unloading 2 4 6 8 10 Truck Unloading 2 2 2 2 2

Truck Loading 2 4 6 8 10 Truck Loading 2 2 2 2 2

Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0 Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0

Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0 Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0

Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0 Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Unloading 0 0 0 0 0 Railcar Unloading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Loading 0 0 0 0 0 Railcar Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Total 6 12 18 24 30 Total 6 6 6 6 6

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Grain Handling 4 9 13 18 22 Grain Handling 4 4 4 4 4

Rice Column 2 4 5 7 9 Rice Column 2 2 2 2 2

Rack 3 5 8 11 13 Rack 3 3 3 3 3

Truck Unloading 3 5 8 11 13 Truck Unloading 3 3 3 3 3

Truck Loading 2 4 5 7 9 Truck Loading 2 2 2 2 2

Enmasse 0 1 1 1 2 Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0

Marine Leg 1 2 3 4 4 Marine Leg 1 1 1 1 1

Barge/Ship Loading 1 2 3 4 4 Barge/Ship Loading 1 1 1 1 1

Railcar Unloading 2 4 5 7 9 Railcar Unloading 2 2 2 2 2

Railcar Loading 3 5 8 11 13 Railcar Loading 3 3 3 3 3

Total 20 39 59 78 98 Total 20 20 20 20 20

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Grain Handling 3 6 13 16 19

Rice Column 0 0 0 0 0

Rack 0 0 2 2 2

Truck Unloading 3 6 11 14 17

Truck Loading 3 6 11 14 17

Enmasse 0 0 0 0 0

Marine Leg 0 0 0 0 0

Barge/Ship Loading 0 0 0 0 0

Railcar Unloading 0 0 1 1 1

Railcar Loading 0 0 1 1 1

Total 9 18 38 47 56

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty Subcategory

TSF Modification

Existing GE w/capacity> DD cutoffs, and does modification or reconstruction

Dryer

Dryer Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading Barge/Ship Unloading

Dryer

Scenario 11

Existing GE w/capacity> DD cutoffs, and does modification or reconstruction

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 10

Existing GE w/capacity >DD cutoffs, but then adds TSF capacity

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty

Barge/Ship Unloading

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Subcategory

Scenario 9

Existing GE w/capacity >DD cutoffs, but then adds permanent storage capacity 

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 8

Existing GE w/capacity <DD cutoffs, but then adds permanent storage capacity and exceed cutoffs

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 7

Existing GE w/capacity < DD cutoffs, but then adds TSF capacity and exceed cutoffs

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 6A

Greenfield GE w/capacity > DD cutoffs

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 6B

Greenfield GE w/capacity > DD cutoffs

Cumulative Number of Affected Facilities Number of Affected Facilities 

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 7

Existing GE w/capacity < DD cutoffs, but then adds TSF 

capacity and exceed cutoffs

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 6A

Greenfield GE w/capacity > DD cutoffs

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 6B

Greenfield GE w/capacity > DD cutoffs

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 8

Existing GE w/capacity <DD cutoffs, but then adds 

permanent storage capacity and exceed cutoffs

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 9

Existing GE w/capacity >DD cutoffs, but then adds 

permanent storage capacity 

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 11

Existing GE w/capacity> DD cutoffs, and does modification 

or reconstruction

Dryer

Barge/Ship Unloading

Affected Facilty Subcategory

Scenario 10

Existing GE w/capacity >DD cutoffs, but then adds TSF 

capacity
Scenario Description

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

6a

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due only to permanent 

storage

 - - - - -

6A

Greenfield GE w/capacity 

> DD cutoffs due only to 

permanent storage

 207 207 207 414 414

6A

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due only to permanent 

storage

 27,940 27,940 27,940 55,879 55,879

6b

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due to adding TSF 

capacity

 - - 36,576 36,576 36,576

6B

Greenfield GE w/capacity 

> DD cutoffs due to 

adding TSF capacity

 - - 207 207 207

6B

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due to adding TSF 

capacity

 - - 27,940 27,940 27,940

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs

 12,192 24,384 36,576 48,767 60,959

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then adds 

TSF capacity and exceed 

cutoffs

 69 138 207 276 345

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs

 7,620 15,240 22,860 30,480 38,100

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs - - - - -

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs 69 138 207 276 345

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent 

storage capacity and 

exceed cutoffs 7,620 15,240 22,860 30,480 38,100

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 

 - - - - -

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 

 138 276 414 552 690

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent 

storage capacity 

 15,240 30,480 45,719 60,959 76,199

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 - - - - -

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 138 276 414 552 690

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 15,240 30,480 45,719 60,959 76,199

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction

 - - - - -

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction

 1,051 2,101 3,152 4,202 5,253

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction

 49,783 99,567 149,350 199,134 248,917

Total 12,192 24,384 73,151 85,343 97,535 Total 1,672 3,136 4,808 6,479 7,944 Total 123,443 218,946 342,388 465,831 561,334

Method 5 PM testing

$ 12,192

Baghouse inspection cost 

per facility $ 69 Based on:

Method 9 Cost

$ 2,540

Testing cost: 12,000 2008 $ Labor costs ($/hr): 34.5 From ICR supporting statement, technical labor Testing cost: 2,500 2008 $

Escalation ratio: 584.6/575.4 # times/year: 2 From subpart DDa proposal Escalation ratio: 584.6/575.4

# hrs per affected facility: 1 Based on estimated time for inspection

Cumalative Cost For Each Year, For Each Scenario -PM Testing Cost

Cumulative Costs For Each Year

Scenario Description

Cumalative Cost For Each Year, For Each Scenario -Method 9 Opacity Annual Cost

Cumulative Costs For Each Year

From CISWI standards, and escalated to 2012 $ 

from 2008$ From CISWI standards, and escalated to 2012 $ from 2008$

Cumalative Cost For Each Year, For Each Scenario -FF/dust collector Inspection Annual Costs

Scenario Description

Cumulative Costs For Each Year
Total Capital Costs - Shed, Dryer Screens, FF Total Annual Costs - PM testing, baghouse inspection, opacity testing, visual monitoring, Shed, dryer, FF

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

6

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs

 - - - - -

6

Greenfield GE w/capacity 

> DD cutoffs

 149,351 149,351 298,703 448,054 448,054

6a

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due only to permanent 

storage - - - - -

6a

Greenfield GE w/capacity 

> DD cutoffs due only to 

permanent storage

 33,080 33,080 33,080 66,160 66,160

6b

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due to adding TSF 

capacity - - 589,400 589,400 589,400

6b

Greenfield GE w/capacity 

> DD cutoffs due to 

adding TSF capacity

 - - 233,946 233,946 233,946

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs

 33,200 66,400 99,600 132,800 166,000

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then adds 

TSF capacity and exceed 

cutoffs

 33,613 67,225 100,838 134,450 168,063

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs

 - - - - -

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs

 9,034 18,069 27,103 36,138 45,172

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 

 - - - - -

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 

 18,069 36,138 54,206 72,275 90,344

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 66,400 132,800 199,200 265,600 332,000

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 42,841 85,683 128,524 171,366 214,207

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction - - - - -

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction 59,625 119,249 178,874 238,498 298,123

Total 99,600 199,200 888,200 987,800 1,087,400 Total 196,262 359,444 756,571 952,833 1,116,015

Scenario Description

Cumulative Costs For Each Year

Scenario Description

Cumulative Costs For Each Year
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

6A

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due only to permanent 

storage

 4,934 4,934 4,934 9,867 9,867

6A

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due only to permanent 

storage

 - - - - -

6A

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due only to permanent 

storage

 - - - - -

6B

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due to adding TSF 

capacity

 - - 4,934 4,934 4,934

6B

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due to adding TSF 

capacity

 - - 66,400 66,400 66,400

6B

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due to adding TSF 

capacity

 - - 24,773 24,773 24,773

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs

 1,346 2,691 4,037 5,382 6,728

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs

 33,200 66,400 99,600 132,800 166,000

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs

 12,386 24,773 37,159 49,545 61,931

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs 1,346 2,691 4,037 5,382 6,728

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs - - - - -

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs - - - - -

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 

 2,691 5,382 8,073 10,764 13,455

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 

 - - - - -

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 

 - - - - -

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 2,691 5,382 8,073 10,764 13,455

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 66,400 132,800 199,200 265,600 332,000

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 24,773 49,545 74,318 99,090 123,863

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction

 8,791 17,581 26,372 35,162 43,953

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction

 - - - - -

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction

 - - - - -

Total 21,797 38,661 60,458 82,255 99,119 Total 99,600 199,200 365,200 464,800 564,400 Total 37,159 74,318 136,249 173,408 210,567

Visual monitoring cost 

per affected facility $ 449 Based on:

3-sided shed

$ 33,200 Annual cost = indirect + direct costs

Annua Cost 12,386.29

Labor costs: 34.5 $/hr From ICR supporting statement, technical labor Capital Cost 83 $/sqft Direct + Indirect 5,514

# times a year: 52 From subpart DDa proposal area 400 sq ft Direct costs = maintenance and maintenance labor

# hrs per affected facility: 0.25 Based on estimated time for inspection Direct costs 3,398

mainenance labor 1,699 Calculated based on:

Calculatd using EPA's ACA tool, see Attachment C

Cumalative Cost For Each Year, For Each Scenario -3-sided Shed Capital Cost

Scenario Description

Cumulative Costs For Each Year

Cumalative Cost For Each Year, For Each Scenario -3-sided Shed Annual Cost

Scenario Description

Cumulative Costs For Each Year

Cumalative Cost For Each Year, For Each Scenario -weekly Visual Monitoring

Scenario Description

Cumulative Costs For Each Year
Performed 1 time a month, taking

Hours 4 hours an event, at a rate of

labor cost 35.4 $/hr

mainenance materials 1,699 Based on OAQPS Cost Manual

Indirect Costs = overhead, adminstrative, property tax, insurance, capital recovery

Indirect Costs 8,987.89

Admin, tax, ins. 3,815 From EPA's ACA tool, see attachment C

Overhead 2,039.04

Capital Recovery $ 3,133.85

CRF 0.0943929 Calculated from:

Interest rate 7%

lifetime 20 years

Calculated by multiplying shed costs and CRF
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

6A

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due only to permanent 

storage

 - - - - -

6A

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD 

cutoffs due only to 

permanent storage

 - - - - -

6A

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due only to permanent 

storage

 - - - - -

6B

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due to adding TSF 

capacity

 - - 370,000 370,000 370,000

6B

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD 

cutoffs due to 

adding TSF 

capacity - - 78,986 78,986 78,986

6B

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD cutoffs 

due to adding TSF 

capacity

 - - 153,000 153,000 153,000

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs

 - - - - -

7

Existing GE 

w/capacity < DD 

cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity 

and exceed cutoffs - - - - -

7

Existing GE w/capacity < 

DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs

 - - - - -

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs - - - - -

8

Existing GE 

w/capacity <DD 

cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent 

storage capacity 

and exceed cutoffs - - - - -

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity and exceed 

cutoffs - - - - -

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 

 - - - - -

9

Existing GE 

w/capacity >DD 

cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent 

storage capacity - - - - -

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent storage 

capacity 

 - - - - -

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 - - - - -

10

Existing GE 

w/capacity >DD 

cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 - - - - -

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 - - - - -

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction

 - - - - -

11

Existing GE 

w/capacity> DD 

cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction - - - - -

11

Existing GE w/capacity> 

DD cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction

 - - - - -

Total - - 370,000 370,000 370,000 Total - - 78,986 78,986 78,986 Total - - 153,000 153,000 153,000

Capital Cost

$ 370,000.00 Email from Rice Manufacturer for rice screens Annual cost = indirect + direct costs

Capital Cost

$ 51,000.00 per unit, from vender cost, see attachment C

See attachment C Annua Cost $ 78,986.25

Direct costs = maintenance and maintenance labor

Estimate assumes 1 dryer to be fitted with screens Direct costs $ 14,726 Capital cost estimated assuming 3 dust collectors that would not have been added

maintenance labor $ 7,363 Calculated based on: for dust control but would be to meet additional Dda requirements

Performed 52 a year

Cumalative Cost For Each Year, For Each Scenario -FF/Dust Collector Capital Cost

Scenario Description

Cumulative Costs For Each Year

Cumalative Cost For Each Year, For Each Scenario -Dryer Screen Capital Cost

Scenario Description

Cumulative Costs For Each Year

Cumalative Cost For Each Year, For Each Scenario -Dryer Screen Annualized Cost

Scenario Description

Cumulative Costs For Each Year
Hours

4 hours an event, at a rate of

labor cost 35.4 $/hr

maintenance materials $ 7,363 Based on OAQPS Cost Manual

Indirect Costs = overhead, adminstrative, property tax, insurance, capital recovery

nce, capital recovery Indirect Costs $ 64,259.85

Admin, tax, ins. $ 14,800

overhead $ 8,835.84 60% of maintenance labor+materials, from OCCM

Capital Recovery $ 40,624.01

CRF 0.10979462 Calculated from:

Interest rate 7%

lifetime 15 years See attachment C

Calculated by multiplying screen costs and CRF
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

6A

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD 

cutoffs due only to 

permanent storage

 - - - - -

6B

Greenfield GE 

w/capacity > DD 

cutoffs due to adding 

TSF capacity

 - - 60,531 60,531 60,531

7

Existing GE w/capacity 

< DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity and 

exceed cutoffs

 - - - - -

8

Existing GE w/capacity 

<DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent 

storage capacity and 

exceed cutoffs - - - - -

9

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds permanent 

storage capacity 

 - - - - -

10

Existing GE w/capacity 

>DD cutoffs, but then 

adds TSF capacity

 - - - - -

11

Existing GE 

w/capacity> DD 

cutoffs, and does 

modification or 

reconstruction - - - - -

Total - - 60,531 60,531 60,531

Annual Cost $ 20,176.97

Direct costs = Maintenance, electricty for fan, dust disposal

Direct Costs $ 10,498

Electicity for fan $ 5,000 Based on OAQPS Cost Manual 

Maintenance labor $ 1,699 Based on OAQPS Cost Manual

Annual cost = capital recovery + indirect + direct costs

Cumalative Cost For Each Year, For Each Scenario -FF/Dust Collector Annual Cost

Scenario Description

Cumulative Costs For Each Year
Performed 1 time a month, taking

Hours 4 hours an event, at a rate of

labor cost 35.4 $/hr

Maintenance materials $ 1,699 Based on OAQPS Cost Manual

Dust disposal $ 2,100 Based on $42.14/ton from Boiler NESHAP

and ratio of 3:1 PM to PM10

Indirect Costs = overhead, adminstrative, property tax, insurance, capital recovery

Indirect Costs $ 9,679

Admin, tax, ins. $ 2,040 4% of capital cost, from OCCM

overhead $ 2,039

Capital Recovery $ 5,600

CRF 0.10979462 Calculated from:

Interest rate 7%

lifetime 15 years see attachment C

Calculated by multiplying FF costs and CRF
Permanent Capacity 2,000,000 Grain density: 54 lb/bushel

Temporary Capacity 2,000,000

Permanent Turnovers: 3.61

Throughput based on turnovers: 7,220,000

% of 114 pop with turnovers: 72%

Equivalency Ratio: 0.34

Temporary storage equivalents 680,000

Total permanent storage capacity 2,680,000

Temporary storage turnovers: 1

Uncontrolled Emissions:

Total Uncontrolled Emissions (TonPM10/year)

Affected Facility Type

% grain 

throughput

emission factor 

(lbPM10/ton 

grain) 

Uncontrolled 

emissions (ton 

PM10/year)

% grain 

throughput

emission factor 

(lbPM10/ton 

grain) 

Uncontrolled 

emissions (ton 

PM10/year) 20% rack dryer 10% rack dryer 5% rack dryer

Unloading Truck Straight 25% 0.059 1.4 25% 0.059 0.4 1.8 1.8 1.8

Hopper 25% 0.0078 0.2 75% 0.0078 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3

Railcar 50% 0.0078 0.4 0% 0.0078 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4

Loading Truck 50% 0.029 1.4 50% 0.029 0.4 1.8 1.8 1.8

Railcar 50% 0.0022 0.1 50% 0.0022 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1

Grain handling 100% 0.034 3.3 100% 0.034 0.9 4.2 4.2 4.2

Dryer Rack 20% 0.75 14.6 20% 0.75 4.1 18.7

Dryer Rack 10% 0.75 7.3 10% 0.75 2.0 9.3

Dryer Rack 5% 0.75 3.7 5% 0.75 1.0 4.7

27 18 13 Total

NSPS Controlled 

Total NSPS Reductions (TonPM10/year)

Affected Facility Type % capture % control

Controlled 

Emissions 

(tonsPM10/yr)

Emission 

Reductions (tons 

PM10/yr) % capture % control

Controlled 

Emissions 

(tonsPM10/yr)

Emission 

Reductions 

(tons 

PM10/yr) 20% rack dryer 10% rack dryer 5% rack dryer

Unloading Truck Straight 95% 99% 0.09 1.4 95% 99% 0.02 0.4 1.7 1.7 1.7

Hopper 95% 99% 0.01 0.2 95% 99% 0.01 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3

Railcar 95% 99% 0.02 0.4 95% 99% 0.00 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4

Loading Truck 95% 99% 0.08 1.3 95% 99% 0.02 0.4 1.7 1.7 1.7

Railcar 95% 99% 0.01 0.1 95% 99% 0.00 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1

Grain handling 95% 99% 0.20 3.1 95% 99% 0.05 0.9 4.0 4.0 4.0

Dryer Rack 20% 100% 84% 2.34 12.3 100% 84% 0.65 3.4 15.7

Dryer Rack 10% 100% 84% 1.17 6.1 100% 84% 0.32 1.7 7.8

Dryer Rack 5% 100% 84% 0.58 3.1 100% 84% 0.16 0.9 3.9

24 16 12 Total

Permanent Storage Temporary Storage

Permanent Storage Temporary Storage