alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S208]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MEASURES READ THE FIRST TIME

  The following bills were read the first time:

       S. 181. A bill to amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act 
     of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 
     and to modify the operation of the Americans with 
     Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 
     to clarify that a discriminatory compensation decision or 
     other practice that is unlawful under such Acts occurs each 
     time compensation is paid pursuant to the discriminatory 
     compensation decision or other practice, and for other 
     purposes.
       S. 182. A bill to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 
     1938 to provide more effective remedies to victims of 
     discrimination in the payment of wages on the basis of sex, 
     and for other purposes.

                          ____________________
```
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2010

s1018 

# Order

October 26, 2010

141480

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141480 COA: 289700 Jackson CC: 07-004261-FH JAMES FLEMING, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

D AVIS



### , J., not participating. I recuse myse lf and am not par ticipating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated October 14, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2038 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-240140) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 14, 2020
Exhibit 31.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Jeffrey A. Mason, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Featherlite, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  | 



27
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 69 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 69

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 17 (legislative day, February 16), 2017

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior 
      relating to ``Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public 
 Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 
                               Alaska''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of the 
Interior relating to ``Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public 
Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 
Alaska'' (81 Fed. Reg. 52247 (August 5, 2016)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 16, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2



Bestway, Inc.



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

OF BESTWAY, INC.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the
Form 10-K) for the year ended July 31, 2004 of Bestway, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, Beth A. Durrett, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 15, 2005



/s/ Beth A. DurrettBeth A. Durrett




|                                  |  |                  
|--------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|Subscribed and sworn to before me
|this 15th day of April 2005.     
|                                 
|/s/ Jeanne A. Andress            
|Name:                             |  | Jeanne A. Andress
|Title:                            |  | Notary Public    
|                                 
|My commission expires: 4/13/2006
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 22 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 

relating to ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, 

Reconstructed, and Modified Sources’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2017 

Mr. PERRY submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of a rule submitted by the 

Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Oil and 

Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Oil and Nat5 ural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Recon6 structed, and Modified Sources’’ (published at 81 Fed. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 22 IH 

1 Reg. 35824 (June 3, 2016)), and such rule shall have no 

2 force or effect. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
BEFORE THE 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

MEXICO PROCEDURAL DOCKET Docket DOT -OST -2011.0076 

Application of 

ALLEGIANT AIR, LLC 

For exemption authority pursuant to 49 USC § 40109 Docket DOT -OST -2013-0128 

Las Vegas - Hermosillo, Mexico 

Las Vegas - Los Cabos/San Jose del Cabo, Mexico 

NOTICE OF DORMANCY 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

July 28, 2014 

Aaron A. Goerlich 

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC 

1200 New Hampshire Ave NW 

Washington DC 20036-6802 

Tel (202) 776-3970 

Fax (202) 776-3975 

agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com 

Counsel for Allegiant Air, LLC 
BEFORE THE 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

MEXICO PROCEDURAL DOCKET Docket DOT -OST -2011-0076 

Application of 

ALLEGIANT AIR, LLC 

For exemption authority pursuant to 49 USC § 40109 Docket DOT -OST -2013-0128 

Las Vegas - Hermosillo, Mexico 

Las Vegas - Los Cabos/San Jose del Cabo, Mexico 

NOTICE OF DORMANCY 

Allegiant Air has decided not to initiate scheduled service between Las Vegas, Nevada, on one 

hand, and Hermosillo and San Jose del Cabo, Mexico, on the other hand, for the foreseeable future. This 

service was authorized by Notice of Action Taken dated July 22, 2013 (Docket DOT-OST-2013-0128). 

Expiration of the dormancy period for the routes is August 29, 2014. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Aaron A. Goerlich 

GAROFALO GO ERLICH HAINBACH PC 

Counsel for Allegiant Air, LLC 

July 28, 2014 
Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on July 28, 2014, a copy of the foregoing notice of Allegiant Air was served 

by email upon each ofthe persons listed below. 

Robert Kneisley (AirTran, Southwest) 

Marshall Sinick (Alaska) 

Robert Wirick (American, American Eagle) 

Robert Cohn (ASA, Frontier) 

Eileen Gleimer (ExpressJet) 

Jonathan Hill (JetBiue) 

Alexander Van der Sellen (Delta) 

Joanne Young (Spirit) 

John Fredericksen (Sun Country) 

Dan Weiss (United) 

Steve Morrissey (United) 

Howard Kass (US Airways) 

Barbara Russell (Virgin America) 

Chris Pappaioanou (Mesa) 

Gerry Murphy (Skywest) 

Brian Hedberg (DOT) 

Esta Rosenberg (DOT) 

Brett Kruger (DOT) 

Michael Koester 

bob.kneisley@wnco.com 

marshall.sinick@squiresanders.com 

robert.wirick@aa.com 

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com 

egleimer@crowell.com 

jhill@cooley.com 

sascha. vanderbellen@delta.com 

jyou ng@yklaw .com 

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com 

dan.weiss@united.com 

steve.morrissey@united.com 

howard_kass@usairways.com 

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com 

chris.pappaioanou@mesa-air.com 

gmurphy@crowell.com 

brian.hedberg@dot.gov 

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov 

brett. kruger@dot.gov
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00304

- CV

PLATINUM RECOVERY & RECYCLING, LLC

, Appellant

v.

A

- 1 SPECIALIZED SERV ICES, INC.

, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 1428

- CV Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. We order that appellee recover its costs of this appeal from appellant.

SIGNED February 15, 2017.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frederick W. McTaggart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge anD belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 14, 2003                By: /s/ FREDERICK W. MCTAGGART
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Frederick W. McTaggart
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and
will be retained by Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



              Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David
Dutton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 ("Section 906"), that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.




May 7, 2004                                            /S/ DAVID DUTTON
                                                -------------------------------
                                                         David Dutton
                                                    Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Mattson Technology, Inc. and will
be retained by Mattson Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, Thomas W. Horton, Chief Financial Officer of AT&T Corp., certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
         2002 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2)      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         AT&T Corp.

Dated: March 28, 2003

                                                  /s/ Thomas W. Horton
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Thomas W. Horton
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 14

- 00125

- CR

Juan MARTINEZ , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 5481 Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 22, 2015
AFFIRMED Appellant Juan Martinez was convicted by a jur y of one count of continuous sexual abuse and assessed punishment at ninety

- nine years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The trial court appointed appellate counsel, and counsel timely filed a notice o f appeal.
Martinez ’s court

- appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional
evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967) ; counsel
also filed a motion to withdraw. In his brief, Martinez’s counsel states that he has reviewed the04

- 14

- 00125

- CR

- 2

- entire record and found no reversible error. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 44.2. The brief meets the Anders requirements. See id. at 744 ; see also High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 , 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978);
Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 , 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). As required, counsel provided
Martinez with a copy of the brief and counsel’s motion to withdraw, and informed Martinez o f his right to review the record and file his own pro se brief. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85

– 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); see also Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Martinez did not file a pro se brief.
After r eviewing the entire record, we agree with counsel’s Ander s b rief that the record
contains no reversible error. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment, s ee id. , and grant counsel’ s motion to
withdraw , s ee Nichols , 954 S.W.2d at 85

– 86; Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Martinez wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, s he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or she must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from (1) the date of this opinion

or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing or en banc reconsideration is overruled by this

court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk
of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 68.3 (a)

. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Rule 68. 4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See
id. R. 68.4. Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton 

IZELA E. PAZ 

v. Record No. 1970-96-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

McDONALD'S STORE #01638 JANUARY 14, 1997 

AND 

AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS 

 INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Eric S. Wiener, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Edward H. Grove, III; Brault, Palmer, Grove, 

Zimmerman, White & Mims, on brief), for 

appellees. 

 Izela E. Paz (claimant) contends that the Workers' 

Compensation Commission (commission) erred in finding that she 

failed to prove she sustained an injury by accident arising out 

of her employment. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of 

the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 

5A:27. 

 "To prove the 'arising out of' element, [in a case involving 

injuries sustained from falling down stairs at work,] claimant 

must show that a condition of the workplace either caused or 

contributed to her fall." Southside Virginia Training Ctr. v. 

Shell, 20 Va. App. 199, 202, 455 S.E.2d 761, 763 (1995) (citing 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

County of Chesterfield v. Johnson, 237 Va. 180, 184, 376 S.E.2d 

73, 76 (1989)). "Whether an injury arises out of the employment 

is a mixed question of law and fact and is reviewable by the 

appellate court." Plumb Rite Plumbing Serv. v. Barbour, 8 Va. 

App. 482, 483, 382 S.E.2d 305, 305 (1989). However, unless we 

conclude that claimant proved, as a matter of law, that her 

employment caused her injury, the commission's finding is binding 

and conclusive on appeal. Tomko v. Michael's Plastering Co., 210 

Va. 697, 699, 173 S.E.2d 833, 835 (1970). 

 Although claimant was in the course of her employment when 

her injury occurred, her evidence did not show that any defect in 

the stairs, the presence of any foreign substance on the stairs, 

or any condition peculiar to her workplace caused her to fall 

down the steps and injure herself. Although claimant and her 

witness testified that there was grease and water on employer's 

kitchen floor, no evidence showed that claimant had grease or 

water on her shoes when she fell or that claimant had any 

problems walking through the kitchen before she descended the 

stairs. Moreover, employer's witness testified that she examined 

the stairs immediately following claimant's fall and did not 

observe any grease, water, or foreign substance on the floor or 

stairs. Because no evidence showed a causal connection between 

the conditions of claimant's employment and her fall, we are 

unable to find that she proved as a matter of law that her injury 

arose out of her employment. 
 3 

 For the reasons stated, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H192]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              ADJOURNMENT

  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now 
adjourn.
  The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 8 o'clock and 54 minutes 
p.m.), the House adjourned until tomorrow, Wednesday, January 14, 2009, 
at 10 a.m.

                          ____________________
```