alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NitroMed, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Grimm, Senior Vice President, Business Development and Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated:
December 18, 2003

| |  | /s/JOSEPH GRIMMJoseph Grimm
Senior Vice President, Business Development and Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NitroMed, Inc. and will be retained by
NitroMed, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 712 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-391, K2025-389.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27190 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NitroMed, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Loberg,Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

###### (1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

######  

###### (2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 3, 2005 | /s/  MICHAEL D. LOBERG, Ph.D.          |   |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | Michael  D. Loberg, Ph.D.              |
|                          | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27188]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 458 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-380, K2025-378.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27188 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 710 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-388, K2025-386.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27186 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Table 12 below illustrates allocations to States and Tribes and transfers to the UMWA for FY 2023 to FY 2025.

Permanent Appropriations 2023 

Actual

2024 

Annualized 

CR

2025 

Estimate

Change 

from 2024

Payments to States and Tribes

Payments to States in Lieu of Coal Fee Receipts (Treasure Funds)

In Lieu Payments to Certified States and Tribes 31.4 30.3 24.9 -5.4

Mandatory Sequester -1.8 -1.7 -1.4 0.3

Subtotal 29.7 28.6 23.5 -5.1

Mandatory Grants to Noncertified States (AML Fund)

State & Tribal Share 16.2 16.1 18.3 2.2

Historic Coal Fund 61.5 59.2 63.5 4.3

Minimum Program Make Up 25 27.1 26.2 -0.9

Mandatory Sequester -5.9 -5.8 -6.2 -0.3

Subtotal 96.9 96.6 101.8 5.3

Total - Payments to States and Tribes 126.5 125.1 125.3 0.2

Payments to UMWA Health Benefit and Pension Plans

Payments to UMWA Health Benefit Plans (AML Fund Interest) 6 1.6 6.1 4.4

Supplemental Payments to UMWA Health Benefit Plans (Treasury Funds) 342.1 363 428.9 65.9

Supplemental Payments to 1974 UMWA Pension Plan (Treasury Funds) 712.5 718.1 719 1

Total - Payments to UMWA Health Benefit and Pension Plans 1,060.6 1,082.7 1,154.0 71.3

Total - Permanent Appropriations 1,187.2 1,207.8 1,279.3 71.5

Subtotal from AML Fund 102.9 98.2 107.9 9.7

Subtotal from Treasury 1,084.3 1,109.6 1,171.4 61.8

* Payments/Grants to States and Tribes are subject to sequestration pursuant to 2 USC 901(a). 

** Payments to the UMWA Health Benefit Plans include payments for additional beneficiaries of the 1993 plan impacted by bankruptcy proceedings in 

2020, as authorized by the American Miner Benefits Improvement Act of 2020.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1024 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1024

 To amend section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, to require 
that annual budget submissions of the President to Congress provide an 
  estimate of the cost per taxpayer of the deficit and of the public 
                                 debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2017

  Mr. Messer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, to require 
that annual budget submissions of the President to Congress provide an 
  estimate of the cost per taxpayer of the deficit and of the public 
                                 debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT IN BUDGET SUBMISSION WITH RESPECT TO THE COST 
              PER TAXPAYER OF THE DEFICIT.

    Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(40)(A) in the case of a fiscal year in which the budget 
        is projected to result in a deficit, an estimate of the pro 
        rata cost of such deficit for taxpayers who will file 
        individual income tax returns for taxable years ending during 
        such fiscal year; and
            ``(B) in the case of any fiscal year, an estimate of the 
        pro rata cost of the public debt for taxpayers who will file 
        individual income tax returns for taxable years ending during 
        such fiscal year.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 44 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 44

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior 
 relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the 
procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to 
          the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, 

              

 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land 
Management of the Department of the Interior relating to ``Resource 
Management Planning'' (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 89580 (December 12, 
2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 7, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 44

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior 
 relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the 
procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to 
          the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Diversified Futures Trust I
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000926805
<NAME>              Diversified Futures Trust I
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1997

<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos

<CASH>                          64,174,647

<SECURITIES>                    1,794,229

<RECEIVABLES>                   32,072

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                66,000,948

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  66,000,948

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,603,748

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      62,397,200

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    66,000,948

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                983,397

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                4,217,172

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (3,233,775)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (8.11)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0452 JOHNNY TYRONE HUFFMAN, JR.,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 11 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 31 2023

08/31/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0452
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frederick W.
McTaggart, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 9, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Frederick W. McTaggartFrederick
      W. McTaggartChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### Schenck and another, Respondents, vs. Sterling Engineering & Construction Company, Appellant.

*November 20*

December *9, 1913.*

Res judicata: *Former adjudication: Appeal: Double costs.*

1. The judgment of this court upon appeal in a former action between the same parties, wherein the same questions were litigated and determined, is conclusive upon the parties in this action.

2. Double costs under sec. 2951, Stats., are not allowed to respondents in this case, although the parties are held to be concluded by a former judgment of this court.

Appeal from an order of the circuit' court for Milwaukee county: Oscar M. Eritz, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

This action was brought by the respondents to recover commission for the alleged sale of certain real estate belonging to appellant. Shortly after the commencement of respondents’ action one *Franklin H. Feasley*commenced an action against the appellant in the same court to recover commission for the alleged sale of the same property. The appellant answered in each of the actions denying liability, and in the instant action set up in its answer the commencement of the action by *Franklin H.*Feasley, and after exami*220nation under sec. 4096, Stats., a motion was made asking that *Frarilclin H. Feasley*be made a party to this action and tbat' be be restrained from prosecuting his action separately and apart from this action, and that the whole controversy be tried in one trial to avoid a multiplicity of actions. The motion -was denied. The appellant appealed, assigning error in denial of motion to make *Feasley*a party to this action and in refusal to perpetually restrain him from prosecuting his action separately and apart from this action.

*C. J. Davelaar,*for the appellant.

*H. L. Kellogg,*for the respondents *Schenck*and *Hayward.*

Eor the respondent' *Franklin H. Feasley*there was a brief by *Perry, Morton & Kroesing,*and oral argument by *George E. Morton.*

KeewiN, J.

The same questions presented between the same parties here were litigated and determined in a former action and disposed of on a former appeal in this court. *Schenck v. Sterling E. &. C. Co.*151 Wis. 266, 138 N. W. 637, 769. The appellant contends that a different question is presented on this appeal. But an examination of the record shows that the issues are the same. The parties are therefore concluded by the judgment of this court on the former appeal. *State ex rel. Kurath v. Ludwig,*146 Wis. 385, 132 N. W. 130; *Kiley v. C., M. & St. P. R. Co.*142 Wis. 154, 125 N. W. 464; *Jeffery v. Osborne,*145 Wis. 351, 129 N. W. 931; *West v. Bayfield M. Co.*149 Wis. 145, 135 N. W. 478; *Roach v. Sanborn L. Co.*140 Wis. 435, 122 N. W. 1020; *Twentieth Century Co. v. Quilling,*136 Wis. 481, 117 N. W. 1007; *Case v. Hoffman,*100 Wis. 314, 75 N. W. 945.

The respondents insist that double costs under sec. 2951, Stats., should be allowed them. We are not inclined, however, to allow double costs or anything further than the usual costs on affirmance.

*By the Court.*— The order appealed from is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                             ------------
                            CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
"Report") of AMCON Distributing Company (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter
ended December 31, 2007, I, Christopher H. Atayan, Chief Executive Officer and
Vice Chairman of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge, that:

    (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of the Company.


Date: January 16, 2008          /s/ Christopher H. Atayan
                                -------------------------
                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                        and Vice Chairman
EXHIBIT 10.20








Narrative Summary of American Consumers, Inc.


Executive Officer Base Salaries for Fiscal 2010





The following table sets forth the base salary established for the fiscal year ending in May 2010 for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”), the only executive officer of the Company who qualifies as a “named executive officer” pursuant to Item 402(m)(2) of Securities and
Exchange Commission Regulation S-K.  The Board of Directors of the Company, acting upon the recommendations of management and the Board’s Compensation Committee, has elected to leave the Chief Executive Officer’s base salary unchanged from his base salary for the Company’s 2009 fiscal year.






Name:
Title:
Annual Base Salary:Michael A. Richardson
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
$88,400
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Joseph “Joe” Walter Darlak, * From the County Court at 

 Law of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 1-1268-12.

Vs. No. 11-13-00177-CV * August 15, 2013

City of Abilene, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

 This court has considered Joseph “Joe” Walter Darlak’s motion for voluntary 

dismissal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court=s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal are taxed against Joseph “Joe” Walter Darlak.
Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony J. Sansone, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2005 of Sento Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



5.     The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
June 28, 2005

| |  | /s/ANTHONY J. SANSONEAnthony J. Sansone
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---