alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, David W. Dorman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AT&T;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date:  March 10, 2004

                                            /s/ David W. Dorman
                                          -------------------------
                                           Chief Executive Officer
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United St ates District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-1034

___________ Hugh A. Cook, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. B & W Co., Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 15, 2009 Filed: June 8, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Hugh Cook appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action against his former employer, B & W Company. Upon careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat , 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district co urt. Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 40 0- CV Andre w W. CA M ER ON , Appellant
v . Br enda M. CA M ER ON , Appellee Fr om the 166th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 1991-CI -00547 Honora ble Michae l Peden, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini, J ustice

Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Aug ust 26, 2009 DI SMI SSED Appellant h as filed a motion to di smiss t his appea l. Appellee ha s not opposed the motion. There fore , we g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a) . Costs of appeal
are taxed ag ainst appellant. See id. 42.1(d).

PER C URI AM
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Aceto Corporation, a New York
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas Roth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Douglas Roth
    Chief Financial Officer
    September 26, 2003


                                        5
Exhibit
10.2


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO


 


ROCKETFUEL
BLOCKCHAIN, INC.


 


2018
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This
Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) amends the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of
RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc., a Nevada corporation (formerly B4MC gold mines, Inc.)(the “Company”).


 


1.
Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment, capitalized terms have the meanings set forth in the Plan.


 


2.
Increase in Number of Shares subject to the Plan. Section 3(a) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


 


(a)
Maximum Number of Shares. Subject to the provisions of Section 11(a) below, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may
be issued in connection with all Awards (including Incentive Stock Options) is 4,000,000 Shares. The Shares may be authorized
but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock or treasury shares.


 


3.
Stockholder Approval. This Amendment shall be submitted to the stockholders of the Company for approval within 12 months
after the date of its approval by the Company’s board of directors.


 


4.
Continuation. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


The
undersigned Secretary certifies that the foregoing sets forth Amendment No. 1 to the RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive
Plan as duly adopted by the Board as of September 15, 2020.


 


	Dated:
    September 15, 2020	/s/
Bennett J. Yankowitz
	 	Bennett
    J. Yankowitz, Secretary
# United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 12

- 472 C

August 10

, 2012

(U npublished)



### Romie David Bishop and

Shirley Ann Bishop

,

Plaintiff s ,

v.

The United States of America

Defendant

.



### ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Pro se plaintiff s filed a complaint in this court on July 26 , 2012, seeking declaratory

relief, attorney fees, and costs pursuant to 42 U.S. § § 198 3 and 1988

, Pl.’s Compl. at ¶ 1, 37,

ECF No. 1. In addition to the United States, plaintiffs name as defendants the United S tates

Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the

Honorable Judge Brendon Linehan Shannon, and the Honorable Chief Judge Kevin Gross.

The Tucker Act grants this jurisdiction over claims “against the United State s founded

upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or

any express or implied contract with the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1). H owever, the

Act does no t provide any substantive right to relief. United States v. Testan , 424 U.S. 392, 401

(1976). Thus, a plaintiff seeking relief must base his claim on a separate money

- mandating

source of law

. James v. Caldera , 159 F.3d 573, 580 (Fed. Cir. 1998).

In relying on Sections 1983 and 1988

, plaintiffs have failed to identify a money

mandating source of law that can give rise to an action in this court. See Jefferson v. United

States , 104 Fed. Cl. 81, 89 (2012) (“[T]he court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over

actions arising under sections o f the Civil Rights Acts, including 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . . . and §

1988.”). Moreover, even if plaintiffs had identified a money

- mandating source of law, the court

would have no jurisdiction to hear any claim against any of the named defendant’s except for th e

U nited States. S ee Stephenson v. United States , 58 Fed. Cl. 186, 190 (2003 ). Accordingly,

plaintiff s ’ CASE is hereby DISMISS ED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Rule

12(h)(3), Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims.- 2

- The Clerk is directed to take the necessary steps to dismiss this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________________ Lawrence J. Block

Judge
ghmp_ex106.htm

EXHIBIT 10.6
  
 CONVERTIBLE NOTE
  
 Lone Star Gold, Inc., (the “Company”) for value received, hereby promises to pay to the order of Chris P. Chumas (the “Holder”), the principal sum of $50,287.40 on demand at the office of the Company in such coin or currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts, and to pay interest on said principal sum at the rate of 10% per year, at said office, in like coin or currency. Until demand for payment is made, interest will be payable quarterly, with the first interest payment due on October 17, 2019.
  
 At the option of the Holder,  this Note may, at any time and from time-to-time, prior to the full payment of this Note, be converted, in whole or in part, into fully paid and nonassessable shares of the Company’s common stock upon surrender of this Note to the Company at its office, accompanied by written notice of election to convert and (if so required by the Company) instruments of transfer in form satisfactory to the Company, duly executed by the Holder or by his duly authorized attorney. The number of shares which will be issued upon any conversion of this Note will be determined by dividing the principal amount to be converted (plus, at the  option of the Holder, accrued and unpaid interest) by the lower of (i) $0.001 (the “Fixed Conversion Price”) or, (ii) 50% of the lowest bid price during the forty-five (45) consecutive trading day period ending on the trading day immediately prior to the applicable conversion date.
  
 The Fixed Conversion Price will be proportionately adjusted for stock splits or similar capital reorganizations. Any fractional shares resulting from a conversion will be rounded to the nearest whole share.
  
 If the Company, so long as this Note is outstanding, enters into a subsequent financing with a third party on terms that are more favorable to the third party than as provided by this Note, this Note will be amended to include such more favorable terms.
  
 The Holder may assign this Note by providing written notice to the Company. 
  
 This Note is secured by all of the Company’s assets.
  
 In the event of default, the Company agrees to pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney’s fees.
  
 	 
	 1

	

	 

 
  
 This Note shall be deemed to be a contract made under the laws of North Carolina and  for all purposes shall be construed in accordance with the laws of North Carolina.
  
 	 	LONE STAR GOLD, INC.	
	 	 	 	 
	Dated: July 17, 2019	By:	/s/ William Alessi	
	  
	  
	 William Alessi, 
 Chief Executive Officer
	 

 
  
 	 
	 2
**EXHIBIT 31.2**Certification of the Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)I, Robert W. Pawlak, the Chief Financial Officer of Cohesant Technologies Inc. (the “Company”),certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.(4) The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company andwe have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
 

 
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (theCompany’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and(5) The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the Company’s internal controls over financialreporting.   /s/ Robert W. Pawlak  Robert W. Pawlak  Cohesant Technologies Inc.  Chief Financial Officer
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Readout of Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III Meeting on Red Hill Defueling, Closure and Health Response Plan
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Readout of Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III Meeting on Red Hill Defueling, Closure and Health Response Plan</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Oct. 26, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>WASHINGTON -- Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III convened senior Department leaders yesterday for an update on efforts to safely and expeditiously defuel and permanently close the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility. The Secretary emphasized the need to continue health response efforts to protect and ensure the health of military families affected by the November 2021 water contamination. The meeting included the Secretary of the Navy, Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, Chief of Naval Operations, INDOPACOM Commander, Joint Task Force Red Hill commander Rear Admiral John Wade, and other senior leaders.<br />
<br />
Rear Admiral Wade briefed Secretary Austin that defueling unpacking operations will begin this week and that the Joint Task Force is on schedule. During the meeting, the Secretary relayed his confidence that the Joint Task Force Red Hill will continue to focus on protecting the population and the environment throughout the defueling process. The Secretary emphasized that Department of Defense remains committed to the health and safety of our military families and the people of Hawaii.<br />
<br />
Secretary Austin visited the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility on September 30 to receive an update from Rear Admiral Wade, who is in command of a more than one hundred person Joint Task Force charged with the defueling effort of the facility. Joint Task Force Red Hill continues to work closely with the Hawaii Department of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency on the planning and implementation of the defueling process. Once the Joint Task Force Red Hill has completed its defueling efforts, the Department of the Navy will work with the Hawaii Department of Health and the EPA to close the facility. The Navy will be submitting a closure plan for the Red Hill Facility no later than November 1, 2022 to the Hawaii Department of Health.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
Georqia Department of Natural Resources 

Environmental Protection Division Air Protection Branch 

4244 International Parkway Suite 120 Atlanta Georgia 30354 

4041363-7000 Fax: 4041363-71 00 

Mark Williams, Commissioner 

Judson H. Turner, Director 

July 19, 201 2 

Ms. Gwen Keyes Fleming 

EPA Regional Administrator, Region IV 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-31 04 

Dear Ms. Fleming: 

This letter is being sent in response to concerns that EPA has raised recently regarding 

Georgia EPD's Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) for the Control Techniques Guidelines (CTGs). Based upon communications 

that we have had with your staff, we have been led to believe that EPA is planning to 

propose conditional approval of our SIP in accordance with Clean Air Act Section 

1 1 0 (k) (4). 

Specifically, EPA had a concern that for certain pre-2006 CTGs that the applicability for 

these CTGs was set at 100 tons per year for the 7-county area that was not a part of the 

13-county 1 -hour ozone nonattainment area. EPA stated that the applicability for these 

7 counties should be the same as the applicability for the 13 counties for each of the 

CTGs. 

If EPA moves forward with conditional approval of our SIP in accordance with Clean Air 

Act Section 1 1 0(k) (4), we commit to submit a SIP revision to address the applicability 

concerns raised by EPA in the federal register notice within one year. Our planned 

schedule is as follows: 

i SIP revision out for public comment July 19, 201 2 

Address comments received, if any August 201 2 

Submit final SIP revision for approval September 201 2 

In light of the fact that we are today proposing rule changes to resolve this issue, we 

request that EPA propose full approval of our SIP simultaneously with conditional 

approval. We are hopeful that we can get full approval from EPA for this SIP as soon 

as possible and we will continue to work with your staff to make this happen. If you 
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Page 2 

should have any questions regarding this SIP revision commitment, please contact 

Jimmy Johnston of my staff at (404)363-7014. 

Sincerely, 

Judson H. Turner 

Director 

Scott Davis, EPA Region 4 

Lynorae Benjamin, EPA Region 4 

Sara Waterson, EPA Region 4 

Jimmy Johnston, Georgia EPD
1 

### Nesky, Anthony

From: Dawn Kolkman <dkolkman@uranerz.com>

Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 4:21 PM

To: Nesky, Anthony

Subject: RE: Public Hearing for proposed rule making 40 CFR Part 192

Thank You!

Dawn Kolkman

Permitting Manager

Uranerz Energy Corporation

1701 East “E” Street

PO Box 50850

Casper, WY 82605

‐ 0850 USA

T: 307

‐ 289

‐ 8900 | F: 307

‐ 265

‐ 8904 | E: dkolkman@uranerz.com

This electronic coummunication, and any attachments, may contain information which is confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended

recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying or reliance upon the contents of this coummunication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this coummunication in error, please notify the sender immediately and kindly delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.

From: Nesky, Anthony [mailto:Nesky.Tony@epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 2:14 PM

To: Dawn Kolkman

Cc: Rosencrantz, Ingrid

Subject: RE: Public Hearing for proposed rule making 40 CFR Part 192

Dear Ms. Kolkman:

Thank you for your interest in hearings about the proposed rulemaking for 40 CFR 192

. I wanted to acknowledge your

request for an extension of the comment period. You do not need to take any further action: I have forwarded your

request for an extension to management, and it is under consideration.

Tony Nesky

Center for Radiation Information and Outreach

Tel: 202-343-9597

nesky.tony@epa.gov

From: Dawn Kolkman [ mailto:dkolkman@uranerz.com ]

Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 2:27 PM

To: Nesky, Anthony

Subject: Public Hearing for proposed rule making 40 CFR Part 192

Tony,

Thank you for returning my call earlier today regarding my request for public hearing. I understood from your message

that it looks like there may be a March 10 th hearing. I look forward to receiving the registration information for that

date.2 Also, I would like to formally request an extension, if possible, for the review of the proposal

– can that occur and how

do I officially go about it?

Thank you again for all your assistance.

Regards,

Dawn Kolkman

Permitting Manager

Uranerz Energy Corporation

1701 East “E” Street

PO Box 50850

Casper, WY 82605

‐ 0850 USA

T: 307

‐ 289

‐ 8900 | F: 307

‐ 265

‐ 8904 | E: dkolkman@uranerz.com

This electronic coummunication, and any attachments, may contain information which is confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended

recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying or reliance upon the contents of this coummunication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this coummunication in error, please notify the sender immediately and kindly delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.