alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                       120
<INVENTORY>                                     13,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,889
<PP&E>                                          50,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             7
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,113
<SALES>                                         83,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,068
<CGS>                                           64,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (60)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,988
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,988
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.77






AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

COMMON STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT




This Amendment No. 1 to the Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2010
(this “Amendment”), to the Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 15, 2007 (the
“Purchase Agreement”) is entered into by and between Cytokinetics, Incorporated, a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Company”), and Kingsbridge
Capital Limited, an entity organized and existing under the laws of the British Virgin Islands (the
“Investor”).



1. Reference to the Purchase Agreement; Definitions. Reference is made to the Purchase
Agreement and, specifically, to Section 10.6 thereof entitled, “Amendment; No Waiver.” Terms
defined in the Amendment and not otherwise defined herein are used herein with the meanings defined
in the Purchase Agreement.



2. Amendment to the Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by replacing
the definition of “Commitment Period,” as set forth in Article I thereof, is hereby
replaced in its entirety with the following definition: “Commitment Period” means the
period commencing on the Effective Date and expiring on the earliest to occur of (i) the date on
which the Investor shall have purchased Shares pursuant to this Agreement for an aggregate purchase
price equal to the Maximum Commitment Amount, (ii) the date this Agreement is terminated pursuant
to Article VIII hereof, and (iii) March 31, 2011.



3. Miscellaneous. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Purchase Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect without change or modification. This Amendment shall be construed under
the internal laws of the State of New York. This Amendment may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. This Amendment shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and
their respective successors and assigns.



(Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page to follow.)IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Common Stock Purchase Agreement
to be signed and delivered by their respective duly authorized representative as of the date first
written above.




KINGSBRIDGE CAPITAL LIMITED




By: A.R. Gardner-Hillman

Antony Gardner-Hillman

Director





CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED




By: Sharon A. Barbari

Sharon Barbari

EVP, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (#1115) (Hybrid).                

*Date and Time:*                     December 11, 2024—12 p.m.-5 p.m. (eastern), December 12, 2024—9 a.m.-1 p.m. (eastern).                

*Place:*                     NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room 3430, Alexandria, VA 22314 (In-Person and Virtual).                

                    To attend the meeting virtually, please send your request for the virtual meeting link to the following email:                     *ciseac@nsf.gov.*

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Persons:*                     KaJuana Mayberry, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone:703-292-8900; email:                     *ciseac@nsf.gov.*

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice, recommendations, and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to Computer and Information Science and Engineering programs and activities.                

*Agenda:*
    - CISE update
    - CISE AC subgroup update
    - NSF quantum activities
    - NSF research security activities

Dated: November 14, 2024.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-27056 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E90]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

RECOGNIZING THE EFFORTS OF THOSE WHO SERVE THEIR COMMUNITIES ON MARTIN 
                            LUTHER KING DAY

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                          HON. DAVID E. PRICE

                           of north carolina

                    in the house of representatives

                       Tuesday, January 13, 2009

  Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. Mr. Speaker, as a co-chair of the 
National Service Caucus, I am pleased to be a cosponsor of H. Res. 43, 
recognizing the importance of national service, supporting the efforts 
of those who serve their communities on Martin Luther King Day, and 
promoting the Martin Luther King Day holiday as a day of national 
service.
  During the 1950s and '60s, civil rights leader Martin Luther King, 
Jr. recognized the power of service to strengthen communities and 
achieve common goals. King's ideas of unity and purpose highlighted the 
great things that can happen when we work together toward a common 
goal, and these ideas are as important today as they were 50 years ago.
  In 1994, Congress passed the King Holiday and Service Act to 
transform the King Holiday into a national day of service to meet 
community needs. Since that time, millions of Americans have 
participated in community-building activities on King Day, treating the 
holiday as ``a day on, not a day off.''
  The day before President-elect Obama's inauguration is the Martin 
Luther King holiday. With thousands of projects planned across the 
country, in addition to a call to serve from President-elect Obama, the 
2009 King Day of Service on January 19 promises to be the most 
successful national service effort to date.
  Both President-elect Obama and Vice-President-elect Biden, along with 
their families, will be participating in service events to honor Martin 
Luther King and commemorate the holiday. I encourage my colleagues and 
their staff to share in the spirit of volunteerism and unity by 
participating in a service opportunity here in Washington, DC, or back 
home with their constituents on January 19.
  I am pleased that the President-elect has been part of the call to 
ensure that this day be a day devoted to service. However, I know, as 
President-elect Obama knows, that one day of good deeds is not enough. 
Throughout the presidential campaign, the President-elect spoke about a 
new era of civic engagement, and I hope that the passage of H. Res. 43 
will build on Martin Luther King day and the Inauguration and reaffirm 
our ongoing commitment to service.

                          ____________________
```
## A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc.

**Secretary of Labor v. A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc.**

**OSHRC Docket 13-0224**

**Oral Argument before Review Commission**

Recording of June 07, 2018 argument before the Review Commission

Last Updated: June 7, 2018
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Launch
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Launch</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Aug. 30, 2023</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>We are aware of the ballistic missile launch and are consulting closely with our allies and partners. While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory, or to our allies, the missile launch highlights the destabilizing impact of the DPRK’s illicit weapons program. The U.S. commitment to the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan remains ironclad.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2




C.F.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)








In connection with the Annual Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.







/s/ Paul R. CookPaul R. CookExecutive Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)American Consumers, Inc.Date:  August 27, 2009
Exhibit 32
Certifications
In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2003 of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of, Jay S.Wintrob, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and N. Scott Gillis, SeniorVice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.         /s/           JAY S. WINTROB   Jay S. Wintrob   Chief Executive Officer            /s/          N. Scott Gillis   N. Scott Gillis   Senior Vice President and
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Research conducted by: Betty S. Chambers Page 1 of 1

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 23

October 10, 1984

Pete Pitsenbarger 

Chief, Division of Reclamation 

Department of Natural Resources 

1800 Washington Street, Room 322 

Charleston, West Virginia 25305

TOPIC: SUBSIDENCE REGULATIONS

INQUIRY: Requested latest rules and regulations on subsidence, and if there was any pending 

decisions or court action.

SEARCH RESULTS:

After checking inhouse files, a copy of Judge Flannery's decision (ROUND II, which included 

regulations on subsidence) was mailed to Mr. Pitsenbarger. He was asked to review the 

Flannery ruling and if further data was needed, to give specific instructions for a COALEX 

search. A follow-up telephone call was made on October 12. Mr. Pitsenbarger stated the 

ROUND II documents were sufficient and a search was not needed at the present.
EXHIBIT 21.

                     SUNBEAM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           JURISDICTION OF
COMPANY NAME                               INCORPORATION               DOING BUSINESS AS
------------                               ----------------            ------------------
<S>                                       <C>                 <C>
Sunbeam Americas Holdings, Ltd.  ......    Delaware                            -
Goose Holdings, Inc. ..................    Delaware                            -
Sunbeam Products, Inc.  ...............    Delaware            Sunbeam Consumer Products Worldwide
OP II, Inc. ...........................    Florida                             -
Duck Holdings, Inc.  ..................    Delaware                            -
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7028

WILLIAM F. BASKINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY MCMASTER,

Attorney General for South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-04-2220-4)

Submitted: March 17, 2006 Decided: April 5, 2006

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William F. Baskins, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*Baskins did not take issue with the district court’s

timeliness determination in his informal brief on appeal, so he has

waived review of that portion of the district court’s decision.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We have also carefully reviewed the

district court’s disposition of Baskins’ ineffective assistance of

counsel claim and would not find the court’s rejection of that

claim to be debatable or wrong.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William F. Baskins seeks to appeal the district court’s

order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as time-barred and, in the

alternative, on the merits. This order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Baskins has not made the requisite

showing.*

 Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
- 3 -

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Page 1 of 1

To: XXXXXXXX

From: XXXXXXXXX

Subject: SEC results of XXXXX polymer sample 

Date: 07 February 2011
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60688

 

GLYNN RHODES,

Petitioner-Cross-Respondent

versus

TIDELAND WELDING SERVICE, INC;

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY;

Respondents-Cross-Petitioners

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

 

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Benefits Review Board

(94-1955)

 

August 8, 1997

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
----

----

| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period      ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                          |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |

| Date:  November 7,      2008 | /s/ William J.      Fehrman                |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                        | William      J. Fehrman                    |   |
|                                        | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                        | (principal      executive officer)         |   |

----

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 189 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10977]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 Senate

Friday, December 19, 2008

(Legislative day of Wednesday, December 10, 2008)

  The Senate met at 10 and 37 seconds a.m., on the expiration of the 
recess, and was called to order by the Honorable Ron Wyden, a Senator 
from the State of Oregon.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

     I, Hunter M.A. Carr, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ITIS Holdings Inc.,
a Nevada Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
     on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
     to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure
     internal control over financial reporting.

     Date:  July 11, 2005
     --------------------

     /s/ Hunter M.A. Carr
     --------------------
     Name: Hunter M.A. Carr
     Title: Chief Executive Officer