alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

      ( print page 92199)    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 449 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-356, K2025-354.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27137 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
     and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
     undersigned officer of American Science & Engineering, Inc., a
     Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such
     officer's knowledge and belief, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
     for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-K
     fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
     results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Roger P. Heinisch
---------------------------
ROGER P. HEINISCH
INTERIM PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

JULY 29, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        7,192,821
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               7,192,821
<CASH>                                         827,741
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              79,751
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         286,428
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,875,669
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             29,898,561
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          3,080,609
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  7,331,440
<COMMON>                                       102,501
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,875,669
<PREMIUMS>                                   4,497,702
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            297,733
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (5,179)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   2,922,277
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,017,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           281,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (430,117)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (146,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (284,117)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (284,117)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.77)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              31,982,392
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          2,922,277
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             487,000
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             4,267,000
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             29,898,561
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E55]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     HONORING SAM AND DORIS SHORTER

                                 ______
                                 

                      HON. SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR.

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, January 9, 2009

  Mr. BISHOP of Georgia. Madam Speaker, I rise today to offer my 
congratulations to Sam and Doris Shorter of Cataula, Georgia, upon the 
occasion of their golden wedding anniversary on January 17, 2009. In 
this day and age where family values are often discussed, I can think 
of no greater testament to life, love, honor, and family values than 
the commitment of a 50 year marriage.
  Samuel Shorter and Doris Lawson, both native Georgians, were born, 
reared and educated in Terrell County. They met while attending Terrell 
County high school. Sam was the starting guard on the basketball team 
and Doris was a pretty girl who caught his eye and snared his heart. 
After courting for just a few months, they both realized they had found 
true love and were destined to be partners in life. Shortly thereafter, 
Sam and Doris were joined in holy matrimony on January 17, 1959.
  Along the way, during these last 50 years, they built a loving home, 
had successful careers, created a business and raised a family. 
Although they settled in New Jersey in the early 1960s, they never 
forgot their Georgia roots, and retired to Georgia in 2003.
  Their marriage has been blessed with three children--Malcom, Tonya 
and Courtney; a loving daughter-in-law Joan; and six granddaughters--
Natalya, Olivia, Alazandra, Victoria, Ciara and Daijohna.
  Madam Speaker, I ask you and my colleagues to join me in 
congratulating the Shorters as they celebrate 50 years of marriage. It 
is refreshing to see two people who have devoted their lives to 
creating a successful marriage and happy family. They are an example of 
what a little dedication, a lot of love, and a belief in God can 
create.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1159
BRENDA SAWADA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General; REGINA EWING, Supervisor; LISA MILLER, Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00754-AMD) Submitted: July 16, 2008 Decided: September 23, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael J. Snider, Ari Taragin, Jeffery C. Taylor, Jason I. Weisbrot, Jacob Statman, SNIDER & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Brenda Sawada appeals the district court’s order denying her motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f), and granting Defendants-Appellees’ motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sawada v. Potter , No. 1:06-cv-00754-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 9, 2007). We grant the motion to withdraw filed by one of Sawada’s attorneys and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6963

JOHNATHAN CRAIG, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

LORETTA KELLY, Warden, 

 Respondent – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:07-CV-00464-GBL-TCB) 

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008 

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Johnathan Craig, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Johnathan Craig seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) 

(2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Craig has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny his 

motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1133 

AN ACT 

To amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability 

Act of 2014 to authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide for an operation on a live donor for 

purposes of conducting a transplant procedure for a veteran, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1133 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Transplant 

3 Coverage Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO PROVIDE FOR OPERATIONS ON 

5 LIVE DONORS FOR PURPOSES OF CON6 DUCTING TRANSPLANT PROCEDURES FOR 

7 VETERANS. 

8 Section 101 of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Ac9 countability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–146; 38 U.S.C. 

10 1701 note) is amended by adding after subsection (t) the 

11 following new subsection: 

12 ‘‘(u) TRANSPLANT PROCEDURES WITH LIVE DO13 NORS AND RELATED SERVICES.— 

14 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraphs (2) 

15 and (3), in a case in which a veteran is eligible for 

16 a transplant procedure from the Department, the 

17 Secretary may provide for an operation on a live 

18 donor to carry out such procedure for such veteran, 

19 notwithstanding that the live donor may not be eligi20 ble for health care from the Department. 

21 ‘‘(2) OTHER SERVICES.—Subject to the avail22 ability of appropriations for such purpose, the Sec23 retary shall furnish to a live donor any care or serv24 ices before and after conducting the transplant pro25 cedure under paragraph (1) that may be required in 

26 connection with such procedure. 
3 

•HR 1133 EH

1 ‘‘(3) USE OF NON-DEPARTMENT FACILITIES.— 

2 In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary may 

3 provide for the operation described in paragraph (1) 

4 on a live donor and furnish to the live donor the 

5 care and services described in paragraph (2) at a 

6 non-Department facility pursuant to an agreement 

7 entered into by the Secretary under this section. The 

8 live donor shall be deemed to be an individual eligi9 ble for hospital care and medical services at a non10 Department facility pursuant to such an agreement 

11 solely for the purposes of receiving such operation, 

12 care, and services at the non-Department facility.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 7, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1133 

AN ACT 

To amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and Acother purposes. a transplant procedure for a veteran, and for ation on a live donor for purposes of conducting retary of Veterans Affairs to provide for an oper- countability Act of 2014 to authorize the Sec-
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") of
Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the
"Company"), for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to his respective knowledge:

         1.       the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  March 28, 2003                   /s/ Richard D. Parsons
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Richard D. Parsons
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.



Dated:  March 28, 2003                   /s/ Wayne H. Pace
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Wayne H. Pace
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  “Report”), I, Dinesh R. Desai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ Dinesh R. Desai    
| |  |                        
| |  | Dinesh R. Desai        
| |  | Chief Executive Officer

November
  30, 2006



---
**EXHIBIT 23.2**
**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIEDPUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AMERCO
The audits referred to in our report dated August18, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements of AMERCO,and subsidiaries and SAC Holdings Corporation and its subsidiariesand SAC Holdings Corporation II and its subsidiaries which isincorporated in Item 8 of the Form 10-K by reference to the annualreport to stockholders for the year ended March 31, 2003included the audit of the financial statement schedules listed in theaccompanying index. These financial statement schedules are theresponsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibilityis to express an opinion on these financial statement schedules basedupon our audits.
In our opinion such financial statement schedulespresent fairly, in all material respects, the information set forththerein.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 18, 2003
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the annual report of Oncolytics Biotech Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Doug Ball, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Doug Ball


__________________________________


Doug Ball, CA


Chief Financial Officer


Principal Accounting and Financial Officer


March 24, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Oncolytics Biotech Inc. and will be retained by Oncolytics Biotech Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James L. Schaeffer, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polymer Group, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

| Date: November 14, 2005 |     | /s/ JAMES L. SCHAEFFER |
|------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------|
|                         |     | James L.  Schaeffer    |
|                         | * * | *Chief  Executive Officer*  |

 

----