alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
0042. Comments covering the accuracy o

t

s bu

de

a

d suggest

o

s 

o

educ

g t

e bu

de

s

ou

d be d

ected to t

e 

at 800 

Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591. ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200. 

AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP FOR AMATEUR-BUILT AND OTHER 

NON-TYPE CERTIFICATED AffiCRAFT 

(does not include light-sport) 

U. S. Identification T004 7650 

Name of Amateur I N_o_n_T_c_· 

Model Ou4d Serial Number BSQ4DUTOE 

Class (airplane, rotorcraft, glider, weight shift control, powered-parachute, etc.) Rotorcraft - UAS 

Type of Engine Installed (reciprocating, turboprop, 2 or 4 cycle, electric, etc.) Electric 

Manufacturer, Model and Serial Number of each Engine Installed SteadiDrone PTY Ltd 

Model 3506 650KV Number of Engines Installed 4 

BuiltforLandorSeaOperation Land & SEA NumberofSeats _0 ________ _ 

MUST CHECK ONE 

O More than 50% of the above-described aircraft was built from miscellaneous parts and I am the owner. (This option is for aircraft 

eligible for amateur-built certification.) · 

D More than 50% of the above-described aircraft was bu11t from a kit (prefabricated parts) and I am the owner. The bill of sale from 

the kit manufacturer is attached. (This option is for aircraft eligible for amateur-built certification.) 

[2] I certify that the above-described aircraft is a newly built non-type certificated aircraft and is not currently registered in another 

country. (This option is for aircraft eligible for experimental certification other than amateur-built.) 

D I certify that the above-described aircraft is a previously built (used) non-type certificated aircraft and is not currently registered in 

another country. (This option is for aircraft eligible for experimental certification other than amateur-built certification.) 0 Evidence of ownership from the aircraft builder through any intervening owners is attached (chain of ownership). D Unable to obtain complete chain of ownership. Statement as to ownership history and whereabouts of aircraft is attached. 

Name of Owner: Daniel Harry 

Signature of Owner: 

Address: 2215 Repsdorph Rd. 

City: Seabrook 

Telephone: 281-326-1800 

Notary Public: 

State: TX 

.:::J...::...l. •• 

(. f, 

Title of Signer 

(If Appropriate): __ President __:_ __ _ 

Zip: 77586 

State of: Texas f=ounty 07' ''-"c.!.:l.s=-,,--..------------Subscribed and sworn to before me this ;;)_1\J day of -;;::ri/.::;-

My Commission Expires: Jl-{ ' 

lMa-1dR fY{ CJ)df ------------------ . 

(Signature of Notary Public) If"¥7!-&. yraier.ie. I 
~ ......, ;e; 

' ~ :;;JJ .<'I 

!!> ,.., .. "' .., :::!!11 """' ..., 

n 

s:l -1 rrn ;;o 

..c: "" rn 

::e ., 

(i; =i 

""0 -i.Z: 

t3 "'-, 

::::j I'..) ;~ -< <:> 

a :;;;; 

i 

--·-

'
|    |                                                                                                                    |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed the Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Industrial Services of America, Inc.; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |
| April 30, 2014 | /s/  Orson Oliver |
| Date           | Orson Oliver, Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer |
#### Kruse, Appellant, vs. Weigand and another, Respondents.

*February 12*

March *10, 1931.*

For the appellant there were briefs by *Alexander Wiley*and *Robert L. Wiley,*both of Chippewa Falls, and oral argument by *Alexander Wiley.*

*Roy P. Wilcox*of Eau Claire, for the respondents.

*207Nelson, J.

This case, and the case of Anna Kruse v. Arthur J. Weigand and Ray Wilcox, decided herewith *(ante,*p. 195, 235 N. W. 426), were tried together. This case, therefore, is ruled by the decision in the case in which Anna Kruse was plaintiff.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed. No costs to be taxed, except clerk’s fees to be taxed against appellant.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.2


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-04835 and 333-64998 on Form S-3 of Alaska Airlines, Inc. of our report dated
February 27, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph regarding the change in the method of accounting for
goodwill, discussed in Note 15 to the financial statements), appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alaska Airlines, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2004.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Seattle, Washington
February 22, 2005
#### City of Milwaukee, Appellant, vs. Public Service Commission and another, Respondents.

*September 11*

October *10, 1939.*

*399For the appellant there was a brief by *Walter J. Mattison,*city attorney, and *Joseph L. Bednarek,*assistant city attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Bednarek.*

For the respondent Public Service Commission there was a brief by the *Attorney General, Harold H. Persons*and *H. T. Ferguson,*assistant attorneys general, and *Philip H. Porter,*counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Ferguson.*

*Fred L. Luehring*of Milwaukee, for the respondent town of Greenfield.

Rosenberry, C. J.

It is considered that the trial court correctly held that upon the facts stated in the complaint and the exhibits annexed thereto, it clearly appears that the city of Milwaukee is in no' manner affected by the order and so has no interest which entitles it to maintain an action to set aside the order of the Public Service Commission authorizing the town of Greenfield to construct mains and an elevated tank as set out in its application.

*By the Court.*— The order appealed from is affirmed.
EX-10.13





 Exhibit 10.13 

KAMD Holdings, Inc. 
 111
Radio Circle 
 Mount Kisco, NY 10549 

January 31, 2017 
 Mr. Matthew Jennings 

Dear Matt: 
 On behalf of KAMD Holdings, Inc.
(“KAMD”), I am pleased to extend to you this consulting agreement on the following terms and conditions: 
 Title. Member
of the Board of Directors (the “Board”). 
 Salary. You will receive an annual salary of $50,000, effective starting
February 1, 2017 (the “Start Date”), payable in accordance with normal payroll practices of KAMD and its subsidiaries. 

Options. You will be granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock in KAMD. Options granted will be exercisable at a per
share price of$1.00. Options will vest ratably over a four-year period from the Start Date, and will be subject to accelerated vesting in the event of a sale of KAMD. 

If you are in agreement with the contents of this letter, please execute both copies in the space provided below and return one copy to me,
retaining the other copy for your files. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. 
 Sincerely, 

Christopher W. Anderson 
 President 

Agreed and accepted: 
  

							
	 /s/ Matthew Jennings
	 		 		 	1/31/2017                        
	Matthew Jennings	 		 		 	Date
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,2006 of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RobertC. Caller, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

1.                 The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act       of 1934; and

2.                 The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 15, 2007
| /s/ Robert C. Caller                                             |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Caller                                                 |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
hpgexhibit105.htm










Exhibit 10.5


 





 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  









 




  





4











  









 




  





5











  









 




  





6











  











  





7











  









 




  





8











  









 




  





9











  









 




  





10











  









 




  





11











  









 




  





12











  









 




  





13











  









 




  





14











  









 




  





15











  









 




  





16











  









 




  





17











  









 




  





18











  









 




  





19











  









 




  





20











  









 




  





21











  









 


22
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 



### .!'.'I ,,,

$I# Bkta aor upon the oonteat8 thrrvoi @ml fh0 BtatO Boardoio&atmlu4 a.lothorbomrdohavfneoh~6.ot buildlug 

## OS tb State 

## and the 

## oontoato i l 

## uoh buildlaga, are 

## boreby **huItruot.b BOt**  **to &#ITO**  

## woh burrildings

**nor property**  lnmued, **notr%thStaodiBg** 

## there may be ltm 

### In the appropriationblllm authorizing- 

## --, 02

Dr. Ceo. W. Cox, February 14, 1939, Poge 8

the OXpOBdittUW Of WBOY iOr th. PWWJBt Of in- (luraaoepuluu. 

## ProTidod,

that it 

## lm deolared

to ba tha 

## polloy oltho **Stata** 

### hmunetor at 

### the end 6f oaoh **two-year** 

### prlod to 8o tl



### 814 a l pproxlukl7 oae 

### poroont of the Tolra 0r all ~UbllO btllldln&m own.4 w the stste w l 

### l

laMag tund utll ton per 0-t of the total T&U ~0s fi WOh bUfldb&# hU b.aB 880WUhtd, and .that thlm 8lBklBg fun6 mu k lBTwtoa la 

## theaboo 4lmtrlot8 af thla

State.* 

### Nhllo 

## thla

ruolutlea doa not 

## hawet&o 

### eiYeot OS l #JO BWíd & U pt it 6 O W b T 0 tb, O fl OOt Oi l 1U IQW 

### tb, putlaulum~~o0tn8ol+e4ap0n lntha 

## molutlo8801~ l 

### t&t partlamlu 

### thing 

### or ooadltlon

### ulatr or wtll mob rwolut%on im otboryi~orevoked by 

### tha Loglelaturo.



## Thfo~laloa **wwmlw t&k**  **opln&ta oi.**  **Sha .Sonoreb&**  **w. I.**  **d*Ti..** **wrlttdseteber ;**  **‘ @a**  **la& -ua**  **,toilaa Ia**  **gDok ’**  **86, Pa@+.**  

### 848, *lnl o B

8898 u r ll a ll l lbwq8oBt 

### o o a o wln@ *l a l o B8. Yo u r8 T b r y t r u l y



## IlRrob
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H169]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        NATIONAL MENTORING MONTH

  (Mr. DONNELLY of Indiana asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute.)
  Mr. DONNELLY of Indiana. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to join my 
colleagues in honoring the contributions of mentors as we celebrate 
National Mentoring Month.
  I want to recognize mentoring programs across America that are 
dedicated to encouraging all aspects of student development. I believe 
mentoring is an essential tool in cultivating a child's emotional and 
behavior development, and I strongly support these programs.
  I would also like to congratulate an exemplary program in my district 
that is celebrating its 10th anniversary, the Joy Elementary School in 
Michigan City, Indiana. This program is a school-based mentoring 
program, partnering Michigan City area schools with the Michigan City 
business community. It is with great pleasure that I stand before the 
House and the American people today and commend the work of mentors and 
programs like Safe Harbor.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge all my colleagues to vote for the resolution 
honoring mentors.

                          ____________________
```
#### Estate of Neitman: Prochnow, Appellant, vs. Neitman, Respondent.

*January 9*

February *5, 1929.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Eugene A. Clifford*of Juneau and *Grady, Farnsworth & Walker*of Portage, and oral argument by *W. H. Farnsworth.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Hooker & Wagner*of Waupun, and oral argument by *E. W. Hooker.*

For the administrator *de bonis non*there was a brief by *Chr. A. Christiansen*of Juneau.

Crownhart, J.

This case was here before, *Estate of Neitman,*193 Wis. 305, 214 N. W. 345. All questions there decided are the law of the case. *Borosich v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.*194 Wis. 289, 215 N. W. 575. On that appea/ it was held that the contract between Charles Neitman and his father was “valid, definite, and capable of enforcement from and by its own terms.” That contract was entered into long before the indebtedness of the father to his daughter, which claim of the daughter wai allowed by the county court and here sought to be made a prior charge to respondent’s claim under such valid contract.

The only ground upon which this appeal can prevail, if at all, is on the construction of that part of the former decision wherein it was said:

> “The order, therefore, must be modified by subjecting, if necessary, the allowance of $3,000 to the son Charles H. to his proportionate share of the expenses of the administration.”

*128That language, it would seem, is definite and its meaning plain. If it were not, the situation calling it forth would clarify it contrary to appellant’s contention. The respondent had a prior claim under his contract, which could not be subjected to later claims, but respondent was interested in the administration of the estate in order to clear his title to his land, conveyed to him by virtue of the contract, and for that reason was required to pay his proportionate share of. the expenses of administration, as a matter of equity.

The orders of the county court were in conformity with our decision on the former appeal.

*By the Court.*— The appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 5 (Sunday, January 11, 2009)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D24]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
  No committee meetings were held.
```
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter  ended  June 30, 2006 (the "Report") by Intervest Bancshares Corporation
(the  "Company"),  each  of  the  undersigned,  as  the  principal executive and
principal  financial  officers  of  the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Sec.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that,  to  our  knowledge:

(1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jerome Dansker
------------------
Jerome Dansker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
July 31, 2006


/s/ Lowell S. Dansker
---------------------
Lowell S. Dansker, Vice Chairman, President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
July 31, 2006


A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise adopting the signatures
that  appear  in  typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of this written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained  by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 21-0005 

IN RE THE MOTION OF CHRISTIAN B. 

CORRIGAN FOR ADMISSION TO THE 

BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

FILED 

AUG 2 it 2021 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Mootann 

ORDER 

Christian B. Corrigan has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of 

Montana pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar 

Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the 

Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Corrigan has provided the 

necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on 

motion under Rule V. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Christian B. Corrigan may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Suprerne Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DA FED thisc-Li 'day of August, 2021. 

Chief Justice 

2:t3-1-s—e--71) 

08/24/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0005
94 ,I,AIL 

Justices 

2
```

[Federal Register: August 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 148)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 45571-45572]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03au10-20]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81

[EPA-R09-OAR-2010-0590; FRL-9184-7]

 
Determination of Attainment for PM10 for the Las Vegas 
Valley Nonattainment Area, NV

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to determine that the Las Vegas Valley 
nonattainment area in Nevada attained the National Ambient Air Quality 
Standard (NAAQS) for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 
less than or equal to a nominal ten micrometers (PM10) by 
the applicable attainment date (December 31, 2006), and that the Las 
Vegas Valley nonattainment area is currently attaining the standard.

[[Page 45572]]

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 2, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2010-0590, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 
the on-line instructions.
    2. E-mail: tax.wienke@epa.gov.
    3. Mail or deliver: Wienke Tax, Air Planning Office, EPA Region IX, 
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
    Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules 
section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to 
submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wienke Tax at telephone number: (415) 
947-4192, e-mail address: tax.wienke@epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 
IX address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the 
direct final action, of the same title, which is located in the Rules 
section of this Federal Register. EPA is approving the attainment 
determination as a direct final rule without prior proposal because EPA 
views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse 
comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the 
preamble to the direct final rule. If EPA receives no adverse comments, 
EPA will not take further action on this proposed rule.
    If EPA receives adverse comments, EPA will withdraw the direct 
final rule and it will not take effect. EPA will address all public 
comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA 
will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. 
Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, 
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed 
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions 
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

    Dated: July 21, 2010.
Keith Takata,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2010-19062 Filed 8-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options



 Exhibit
 10.96 
  

			
	  	  	Cortex
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
	Notice of Grant of Stock Options	  	ID: 33-0303583
	and Option Agreement	  	15231 Barranca Parkway
		  	Irvine, CA 92618
	  	  	(949)
                                         727-3157
  


  

			
	(Insert grantee name)	  	Option Number: (Insert option number)
	(Insert grantee street address)	  	Plan: (Insert stock option plan)
	(Insert
grantee City, State, Zip Code)	  	ID:
                                         (Insert ID)
  


 Effective
         (insert grant date), you have been granted a(n) (insert Incentive or Non-qualified) Stock Option to buy (insert number
         of shares) shares of Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) stock at $(insert exercise price) per share. 
 The
                                         total option price of the shares granted is $(insert total option price). 
 Shares
                                         in each period will become fully vested on the date shown. 
  

							
	Shares
	  	Vest
Type	 	Full
Vest	 	Expiration
	(insert
                                       number of shares vesting)
	  	(insert vest
type)	 	(insert date)	 	(insert date)

  
  

 By your signature
                                         and the Company’s signature below, you and the Company agree that these options
                                         are granted and governed by the terms and conditions of the Company’s Stock Option
                                         Plan as amended and the Option Agreement, all of which are attached and made a part of
                                         this document. 
  

  

					
			
	   	 		 	   
	Cortex
                 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
	 		 	Date

			
	   	 		 	   
	(Insert
                 grantee name)
	 		 	Date