alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Plain Writing

The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission is committed to writing new documents in plain language by using the Federal Plain Language Guidelines.

Our goal is to use plain language in any document that:
> 
• Is necessary for obtaining any of our services;• Provides information about any of our services; or• Explains how to comply with a requirement that we administer or enforce.

**Why we make this promise**

While we’ve been believers in plain language for a long time, the Plain Writing Act of 2010 requires all federal agencies to write “clear government communication that the public can understand and use.” President Obama also emphasized the importance of “transparency, public participation, and collaboration” in his January 21, 2009, Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government.

**Let us know how we’re doing**

You can help us to meet our plain language goals by letting us know when we fall short. If you have trouble understanding any of our documents or any material on our Web site, please contact one of the staff we have assigned to oversee our plain language efforts:

**We need your help to comply with this Act!**

Let us know if you have trouble understanding our documents or the pages on our website: plain@oshrc.gov.

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — July 13, 2011 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 13, 2012 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 12, 2013 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 11, 2014 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 13, 2015 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 13, 2016 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 13, 2017 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 13, 2018 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 13, 2019 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 13, 2020 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 13, 2021 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 13, 2022 [HTML] [PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 13, 2023 [HTML][PDF]

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report — April 12, 2024 [HTML] [PDF]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 454 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-371, K2025-369.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27157 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15
- 6474

WILFREDO ANDUJAR , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. KENNY ATKINSON , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:14

- hc

- 02126

- FL )

Submitted : May 30, 2017 Decided: June 12, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Wilfredo Andujar, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Wilfredo Andujar , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (20 12) petition without prejudice . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Andujar leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Andujar v. Atkinson , No.
5:14

- hc

- 02126

- FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Order filed April 10, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals _______________

NO. 14-14-00119-CV

______________

IN RE EDWARD R. NEWSOME, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-24410

O R D E R

This court issued its opinion in this case on February 13, 2014. Texas Rule 

of Appellate Procedure 49.1 provides for the filing of a motion for rehearing within 

fifteen days after a court of appeals’ judgment or order is rendered. Tex. R. App. 

Proc. 49.1. Relator timely filed his motion for rehearing on February 27, 2014. 

This court denied relator’s motion for rehearing on March 11, 2014. Relator filed a 

motion for rehearing en banc on April 7, 2014, more than 15 days after this court’s

denial of relator’s timely-filed motion for rehearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.7. 

“A court of appeals may extend the time for filing a motion for rehearing or en
2

banc reconsideration if a party files a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) no later 

than 15 days after the last date for filing the motion.” Tex. R. App. P. 49.8. A 

party seeking an extension of time in the court of appeals is required to file a motion 

specifically stating the facts that reasonably explain the need for an extension. Rios 

v. Calhoon, 889 S.W.2d 257, 259 (Tex. 1994); see also Tex. R. App. P. 

10.5(b)(1)(C) (requiring motion to extend time to include facts relied on to 

reasonably explain the need for an extension). No motion for extension of time was 

filed in this case, however. 

The Texas Supreme Court has consistently treated minor procedural mistakes 

with leniency to preserve appellate rights. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 

615, 616−17 (Tex. 1997) (implying extension of time when a party perfects an 

appeal in good faith within the 15-day period for filing an extension). Thus, a

motion for extension of time can be implied when a motion for rehearing en banc is 

filed within the 15-day period for filing a motion for extension of time if the 

appellant thereafter files a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b)(1) that contains a 

reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Houser v. McElveen, 243 

S.W.3d 646, 647 (Tex. 2008); see also Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Ctr. Assoc., 

Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 807 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.)

(implying extension but requiring reasonable explanation). 

Accordingly, unless relator files with the clerk of this court a motion that 

complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b)(1) and provides a 

reasonable explanation for the late filing of the party’s motion for rehearing en banc

within 10 days of the date of this order, the court will deny the motion for rehearing 

en banc as untimely.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 31.1**
|    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2018 of Industrial Services of America, Inc.; |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |  |
| April 30, 2019 |  |  /s/ Todd L. Phillips |
| Date           |  | Todd L. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer |
|           |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
**Exhibit 32.1.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Robert B. Barnhill, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of TESSCO TechnologiesIncorporated (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the quarter ended June 27, 2010 (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 11,  2010 | /s/ Robert B.  Barnhill, Jr. |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                   | Robert B.  Barnhill, Jr.     |

 

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
----

Notice pursuant to Article 27(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1) concerning Case COMP/B-1/38348 — Repsol CPP SA

(2004/C 258/03)

1.   Introduction

2.   Parties

3.   The fuel market

4.   The position of Repsol CPP

5.   The notified agreements

6.   Preliminary assessment

6.1.   The agency issue

6.2.   The maximum price clauses

6.3.   The non-compete clauses

7.   The commitments

7.1.   The commitments offered

7.2.   Assessment of the commitments

8.   The Commission's intention at this stage

----

(1)OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 70, 19.3.2002, p. 29.

(3)  See, generally, the reports of the Comisión Nacional de la Energía: ‘Información básica de los sectores de la energía’, accessible at www.cne.es.

(4)  Commission Decision of 29 September 1999 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case COMP/M.1383 — Exxon/Mobil), paragraphs 428 to 439, and Commission Decision of 9 February 2000 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case COMP/M.1628 TotalFina/Elf), paragraphs 22 to 29.

----
<PAGE>

                                                          Exhibit (10)(iii)(A)22


                               September 16, 2002

Thomas W. Horton
AT&T
900 Route 202/206N
P.O. Box 752
Bedminster, NJ  07921-752

Dear Tom:

         Paragraph 5(e) of your employment agreement dated June 10, 1999
("agreement") provides that you must repay your signing bonus if you leave your
employment without Good Reason (as defined in the agreement) before January 1,
2004. We have subsequently discussed and agreed that if your termination before
January 1, 2004 is for Good Reason or due to Death or Disability, then you shall
have no obligation to repay the signing bonus.

         Please sign where indicated below to acknowledge this modification to
the agreement.

                                                     Very truly yours,



                                                     /s/  Mirian M. Graddick
                                                     Mirian M. Graddick



Acknowledged by:

/s/  Thomas W. Horton

---------------------------
Thomas W. Horton
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 732 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-416, K2025-414.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27235 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 10.13

Amendment to Employment Agreement

 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of September 1, 2020 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), by and between Galaxy Next Generation, Inc., (the “Company”), and Gary LeCroy (the “Executive” and, together with the Company, the “Parties”).

 

Whereas, the Company and Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of January 1, 2020, as amended as of September 1, 2020, and

 

Whereas, the Parties desire to amend Section 7(D) of the Agreement in the manner reflected herein, and

 

Whereas, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved the amendment of the Agreement in the manner reflected herein,

 

Now Therefore, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants and conditions herein, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date:

 

1. Relocation. Section 3.6 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and Tthe 51% voting class ownership is no longer part of the employment agreement):

 

“(D) Other.

 

- Issuance of company preferred voting stock in conjunction with issuance to CEO to maintain more than 50% voting right.”

 

2. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more facsimile, electronic or original counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and both of which together shall constitute the same instrument.

 

3. Ratification. All terms and provisions of the Agreement not amended hereby, either expressly or by necessary implication, shall remain in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment, all references to the term “Agreement” in this Amendment or the original Agreement shall include the terms contained in this Amendment.




Title: Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Gary LeCroy Gary LeCroy
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

AND

 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF

ADUDDELL INDUSTRIES, INC.

I, Tim Aduddell, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Aduddell Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”):

|   | a. | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at March 31, 2008, and the results of the Company’s operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                |   |   |   |                                     |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|
| Date:  May 15, 2008 |   |   |   | /s/ Tim Aduddell                         |
|                |   |   |   |                                     |
|                |   |   |   | Tim Aduddell                             |
|                |   |   |   | *President, Chief Executive Officer and* |
|                |   |   |   | *Interim Chief Financial Officer*        |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor,

United States Department of Labor

Complainant,

v.

IMPERIAL SUGAR COMPANY; IMPERIALSAVANNAH, L.P.; and their Successors,

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

OSHRC Docket No. 08-1104

OSHA Inspection No. 310988712

ORDER

Complainant's Motion for Extension ofTime to Serve Answers and Objections to

Respondent Imperial-Savannah, L.P.'s First Interrogatories and First Request for Production of

Documents comes now for consideration before this Court. It appears good cause has been

shown in support ofsaid motion and Respondents will not be prejudiced by the granting ofthe

same.

Wherefore, premises considered, Complainant's Motion for Extension ofTime to Serve

Answers and Objections to Respondent's First Interrogatories and First Request for Production

ofDocuments in the above referenced matter is GRANTED.

Complainant is hereby granted up to and including January 9, 2009, to serve her answers

and objections to Respondent's Interrogatories and Requests.

DEC 1 2 2000

Date: -

-----

tvvo\:..rp'" -k'Vc .

V. L,('.

HONORABLE DENNIS L. ILLIPS

Administrative Law Judge
I'

o

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy ofthe Order was mailed to the parties listed below by first class

mail on December 12, 2008.

08-1104

Stanley E. Keen, Regional Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

Office ofthe Solicitor

Atlanta Federal Center

61 Forsyth Street, Room 7T10

Atlanta, GA 30303

Attn: Karen Mock, Esquire

Charles H. Morgan, Esquire

ALSTON & BIRD, LLP

One Atlantic Center

1201 West Peachtree Street

Atlanta, GA 30309-3424

~~Q&b~ T:B: Dillard, Paralegal Specialist

Post Office Address:

Judge Dennis Phillips

OSHRC

One Lafayette Center

1120 20th Str., N.W. - 9th Floor

Washington, D.C. 20036-3419

(202) 606-5405 FAX (202) 606-5409