From:    Mohan Nagavedu [mnagavedu@aqmd.gov]

Sent:    Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:07 PM

To:    Adams, Lucy H.

Cc:    Mulrine.Phil@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: FW:   More data for EPA on Chrome NESHAP

Attachments: ATOTECH USA INC Fumitrol 140 MSDS.doc; PES DisMist NP at Gene's Plating.pdf

Lucy / Phil,

I will be emailing you the Chrome data you had requested in several emails.  We have a 5 MB limit at a

time.  Also see Cheryl’s email below for this particular attachment.  Please call me if you have a problem

with the attachments.

Mohan Nagavedu

Supervising Air Quality Inspector

909‐396‐3739

909‐396‐3342 fax

MNagavedu@AQMD.Gov

From:     Cheryl Marshall   

Sent:     Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:22 AM  

To:     Mohan Nagavedu  

Cc:     Eugene Kang  

Subject:   More data for EPA on Chrome NESHAP

Mohan,

Attached are the PES Source Test for Gene’s Plating (DisMist NP) and 2 MSDS for Fumitrol 140 that EPA  

asked for.  I believe this completes what was requested of our group with the exception of the Data  

for Table B‐6 and B‐7 which we were unable to locate and Chris Abe, who did the calculations, has  

since left the District.

Cheryl
ATOTECH USA INC -- FUMETROL 140 MIST SUPPRESSANT -- 6810-00F053502 

===================== Product Identification ===================== 

Product ID:FUMETROL 140 MIST SUPPRESSANT 

MSDS Date:02/11/1992 

FSC:6810 

NIIN:00F053502 

MSDS Number: CDRPD 

=== Responsible Party === 

Company Name:ATOTECH USA INC 

Address:1750 OVERVIEW DR 

Box:12000 

City:ROCK HILL 

State:SC 

ZIP:29731-2000 

Country:US 

Info Phone Num:803-817-3500 

Emergency Phone Num:803-817-3500 

CAGE:ATOTC 

=== Contractor Identification === 

Company Name:ATOTECH USA INC 

Address:1750 OVERVIEW DR 

Box:12000 

City:ROCK HILL 

State:SC 

ZIP:29731-2000 

Country:US 

Phone:803-817-3500 

CAGE:0RP46 

Company Name:ATOTECH USA INC 

Address:1000 HARVARD AVE 

Box:12000 

City:CLEVELAND 

State:OH 

ZIP:44109-5000 

Country:US 

Phone:800-752-8464 

CAGE:ATOTC 

============= Composition/Information on Ingredients ============= 

Ingred Name:ORGANIC FLUOROSULFONATE 

Fraction by Wt: 1-7% 

OSHA PEL:2.5 MG/CUM 

ACGIH TLV:2.5 MG/CUM 

===================== Hazards Identification ===================== 

Routes of Entry: Inhalation:YES Skin:NO Ingestion:NO 

Reports of Carcinogenicity:NTP:NO IARC:NO OSHA:NO 

Health Hazards Acute and Chronic:EYES/SKIN: MAY CAUSE IRRITATION. 

 INHALATION: FUMES/VAPORS FROM A HEATED SOLUTION MAY CAUSE 

 RESPIRATORY TRACT IRRITATION. 

Explanation of Carcinogenicity:NONE 

Effects of Overexposure:IRRITATION. 
======================= First Aid Measures ======================= 

First Aid:EYES: IMMEDIATELY FLUSH W/FLOWING WATER FOR 15 MINS. SKIN: 

 WASH EXPOSED AREAS THOROUGHLY W/SOAP & FLOWING WATER. INHALATION: 

 REMOVE TO FRESH AIR. GIVE CPR/OXYGEN IF NEEDED. INGESTION: NEVER 

 GIVE FLUID S/INDUCE VOMITING IF UNCONSCIOUS/HAVINGCONVULSIONS. IF 

 CONSCIOUS/NONCONVULSIVE, INDUCE VOMITING & GIVE 1-2 GLASSES OF 

 WATER/MILK. OBTAIN MEDICAL ATTENTION IN ALL CASES. 

===================== Fire Fighting Measures ===================== 

Extinguishing Media:WATER SPRAY, FOAM, CO2, DRY CHEMICAL. 

Fire Fighting Procedures:WEAR A SCBA & PERSONAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING. 

Unusual Fire/Explosion Hazard:IRRITATING FUMES/VAPORS MAY DEVELOP IF 

 PRODUCT IS EXPOSED TO ELEVATED TEMPS/OPEN FLAME. 

================== Accidental Release Measures ================== 

Spill Release Procedures:WEAR RESPIRATOR & PROTECTIVE CLOTHING. SAFELY 

 STOP LEAK. REMOVE IGNITION SOURCES. DIKE AREA. LARGE: COVER LIQUID 

 POOLS W/FOAM TO CONTROL VAPORS. PUMP LIQUID INTO SALVAGE TANK & 

 RETAIN FOR EVALUATION & /DISPOSAL. (SEE SUPP) 

====================== Handling and Storage ====================== 

Handling and Storage Precautions:NORMAL WAREHOUSE HANDLING & STORAGE IN 

 A COOL, DRY AREA. 

Other Precautions:MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO AQUATIC LIFE IF RELEASED TO OPEN 

 WATERS. DON'T WEAR CONTACT LENSES. AVOID CONTACT W/EYES, SKIN & 

 CLOTHING. DON'T BREATHE FUMES/INHALE VAPORS/MISTS FROM SOLUTION. 

============= Exposure Controls/Personal Protection ============= 

Respiratory Protection:WEAR A NIOSH/MSHA APPROVED ORGANIC VAPOR 

 RESPIRATOR W/DUST & MIST PREFILTER IF VENTILATION IS INADEQUATE. 

Ventilation:LOCAL EXHAUST: RECOMMENDED. MECHANICAL (GENERAL): REQUIRED. 

Protective Gloves:POLYVINYL CHLORIDE 

Eye Protection:CHEMICAL GOGGLES 

Other Protective Equipment:PROTECTIVE CLOTHING, EYEWASH & EMERGENCY 

 SHOWER. 

Work Hygienic Practices:REMOVE/LAUNDER CONTAMINATED CLOTHING BEFORE 

 REUSE. WASH THOROUGHLY AFTER HANDLING. 

Supplemental Safety and Health 

SPILLS: SMALL: COVER W/SAND, CLAY/OTHER NONCOMBUSTIBLE ABSORBENT. USE 

 NON-SPARKING TOOLS TO TRANSFER ABSORBED MATERIAL TO SUITABLE 

 CONTAINER FOR DISPOSAL. CAREFULLY FLUSH AREA W/LARGE VOLUMES OF 

 WATE R. RETAIN WATER-RESIDUE MIXTURE FOR EVALUATION &/DISPOSAL. 

================== Physical/Chemical Properties ================== 

Melt/Freeze Pt:M.P/F.P Text:27-32F 

Spec Gravity:1.025 

Solubility in Water:MISCIBLE 

Appearance and Odor:WHITE/PALE YELLOW, SLIGHTLY CLOUDY LIQUID. 

================= Stability and Reactivity Data ================= 
Stability Indicator/Materials to Avoid:YES 

Stability Condition to Avoid:ELEVATED TEMPS, OPEN FLAME & OTHER 

 IGNITION SOURCES. 

Hazardous Decomposition Products:SULFUR OXIDES & HYDROGEN FLUORIDE. 

==================== Disposal Considerations ==================== 

Waste Disposal Methods:DISPOSE OF IAW/FEDERAL, STATE & LOCAL 

 REGULATIONS. DISCHARGE TO PUBLIC SEWERAGE AUTHORITY SHOULD COINCIDE 

 W/ALL APLLICABLE LOCAL PERMITS & NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. 

 Disclaimer (provided with this information by the compiling agencies): 

 This information is formulated for use by elements of the Department 

 of Defense. The United States of America in no manner whatsoever, 

 expressly or implied, warrants this information to be accurate and 

 disclaims all liability for its use. Any person utilizing this 

 document should seek competent professional advice to verify and 

 assume responsibility for the suitability of this information to their 

 particular situation. 
Material Safety Data Sheet 

SECTION I - Material Identity

SECTION II - Manufacturer's Information

SECTION III - Physical/Chemical Characteristics

SECTION IV - Fire and Explosion Hazard Data

SECTION V - Reactivity Data

SECTION VI - Health Hazard Data

SECTION VII - Precautions for Safe Handling and Use

SECTION VIII - Control Measures

SECTION IX - Label Data

SECTION X - Transportation Data

SECTION XI - Site Specific/Reporting Information

SECTION XII - Ingredients/Identity Information

SECTION I - Material Identity 

Item 

Name 

Part Number/Trade Name FUMETROL (R) 140 MIST SUPPRESSANT

National Stock Number 6850L4162322027

CAGE Code 08514

Part Number Indicator A

MSDS Number 192022

HAZ Code B

SECTION II - Manufacturer's Information 

Manufacturer Name ATOTECH USA INC
Street 1750 OVERVIEW DRIVE

City ROCK HILL

State SC

Country US

Zip Code 29730

Emergency Phone 800-424-9300

Information Phone 803-817-3500

MSDS Preparer's Information 

Date MSDS Prepared/Revised 16JUN98

Active Indicator Y

Alternate Vendors 

SECTION III - Physical/Chemical Characteristics 

Appearance/Odor SLIGHTLY CLOUDY WHITE TO PALE YELLOW 

LIQUID. SLIGHT ODOR

Boiling Point N/A

Vapor Pressure N/A

Vapor Density N/A

Specific Gravity 1.025

Evaporation Rate N/A

Solubility in Water SOLUBLE

Percent Volatiles by Volume N/A

Chemical pH 4-7

Container Pressure Code 1

Temperature Code 4

Product State Code L
SECTION IV - Fire and Explosion Hazard Data 

Flash Point Method NA

Lower Explosion Limit NA

Upper Explosion Limit NA

Extinguishing Media WATER, DRY CHEMICAL, CARBON DIOXIDE, 

FOAM 

Special Fire Fighting Procedures DO NOT GET MATERIAL ON SKIN OR 

CLOTHING. AVOID INHALATION OF FUMES 

OR MISTS. STAY UPWIND, OUT OF LOW 

AREAS, AND VENTILATE CLOSED SPACES 

BEFORE ENTERING. COOL CONTAINERS FROM 

THE SIDE WITH WATER UNTIL FIRE IS 

OUT. USE WATER SPRAY TO REDUCE VAPOR. 

DO NOT PUT WATER DIRECTLY ON LEAK OR 

SPILL AREA. KEEP COMBUSTIBLES AWAY 

FROM SPILLED MATERIAL. SCBA AND 

CHEMICAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING CAN BE 

WORN BUT MAY NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE 

THERMAL PROTECTION FOR CHEMICAL FIRE 

UNLESS STATED BY THE MANUFACTURER 

Unusual Fire/Explosion Hazards DURING FIRE CONDITIONS, PRODUCT MAY 

EVOLVE IRRITATING AND TOXIC FUMES 

SECTION V - Reactivity Data 

Stability YES

Stability Conditions to Avoid NA

Materials to Avoid STRONG OXIDIZERS

Hazardous Decomposition Products THERMAL DECOMPOSITION MAY RESULT IN 

THE EVOLUTION OF CORROSIVE & TOXIC 
FUMES OF HYDROFLUORIC ACID & AMMONIA 

Hazardous Polymerization NO

Polymerization Conditions to Avoid WILL NOT OCCUR

SECTION VI - Health Hazard Data 

Route of Entry: Skin YES

Route of Entry: Ingestion YES

Route of Entry: Inhalation YES

Health Hazards - Acute and Chronic [EYE] IRRITATION TO THE EYES AND 

SURROUNDING AREAS CHARACTERIZED BY 

REDNESS, SWELLING, TEARING AND PAIN. 

[SKIN] IRRITATION TO THE SKIN 

CHARACTERIZED BY REDNESS, SWELLING, 

AND PAIN. [INHAL] IRRITATION TO THE 

RESPIRATORY PASSAGES, INCLUDING THE 

NOSE, AIRWAY AND LUNGS CHARACTERIZED 

BY SORE THROAT, CHEST PAIN, COUGH, 

DIZZINESS, HEADACHE, ANUSEA, AND 

SHORTNESS OF BREATH. [INGEST] 

IRRITATION TO THE MOUTH, THROAT, AND 

STOMACH CHARACTERIZED BY SORE THROAT, 

ABDOMINAL PAIN, HEADACHE, NAUSEA, 

VOMITING

Carcinogenity: NTP NO

Carcinogenity: IARC NO

Carcinogenity: OSHA NO

Explanation of Carcinogenity NR

Symptoms of Overexposure SEE ABOVE

Emergency/First Aid Procedures [EYE] IMMEDIATELY FLUSH EYES WITH 

PLENTY OF WATER FOR AT LEAST 15 MIN. 

LIFT LIDS. GET MED ATTEN IF 
IRRITATION PERSISTS. [SKIN] WASH 

EXPOSED AREAS THOROUGH WITH SOAP AND 

WATER WHILE REMOVING CONTAMINATED 

CLOTHING AND SHOES. LAUNDER BEFORE 

REUSE. GET MED ATTEN IF IRRITATION 

PERSISTS. [INHAL] REMOVE TO FRESH 

AIR. GIVE ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION OR 

OXYGEN AS NEEDED. GET IMMEDIATE MED 

ATTEN. [INGEST] DO NOT INDUCE 

VOMITING. GIVE MILK OR WATER. CALL A 

PHYSICIAN OR POISON CONTROL CENTER 

IMMEDIATELY. NEVER GIVE ANYTHING BY 

MOUTH TO AN UNCONSCIOUS PERSON 

SECTION VII - Precautions for Safe Handling and Use 

Steps if Material Released/Spilled WEAR NIOSH/MSHA APPROVED RESPIRATORY 

PROTECTION AND APPROPRIATE PPE. DO 

NOT GET SPILLED MATERIAL ON SKIN OR 

CLOTHING. STOP LEAK IF YOU CAN DO SO 

WITHOUT RISK. IF NECESSARY, DIKE AREA 

OF SPILL TO PREVENT SPREADING. COVER 

WITH SAND, CLAY OR OTHER NONCOMBUSTIBLE ABSORBENT MATERIAL. 

TRANSFER ABSORBED MATERIAL TO AN 

APPROPRIATE AND PROPERLY LABELED 

CONTAINER FOR DISPOSAL 

Neutralizing Agent NR

Waste Disposal Method DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIAL FROM THE 

USE OF THIS PRODUCT MAY BE SUBJECT TO 

FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL 

REGULATIONS 

Handling and Storage Precautions DO NOT GET IN EYES, ON SKIN, OR ON 

CLOTHING. DO NOT BREATH DUST, MIST OR 
VAPOR. DO NOT TAKE INTERNALLY. USE 

ONLY WITH ADEQUATE VENTILATION. WASH 

THOROUGHLY AFTER HANDLING. EMPTIED 

CONTAINER RETAINS VAPOR AND PRODUCT 

RESIDUE. OBSERVE ALL LABEL 

SAFEGUARDS. KEEP CONTAINER LIGHTLY 

CLOSED IN UPRIGHT PSTN

Other Precautions NR

SECTION VIII - Control Measures 

Respiratory Protection USE NIOSH APPROVED RESPIRATOR WHEN 

TLV ARE EXCEEDED

Ventilation LOCAL EXHAUST OR AN ENCLOSED HANDLING 

SYSTEM IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED. 

MECHANICAL/GENERAL VENTILATION IS 

REQUIRED

Protective Gloves CHEMICAL RESISTANT

Eye Protection CHEMICAL SPLASH GOGGLES AND FACE 

SHIELD

Other Protective Equipment SAFETY SHOWER, EYEWASH STATION

Work Hygenic Practices WASH SKIN THOROUGHLY AFTER HANDLING

SECTION IX - Label Data 

Protect Eye YES

Protect Skin YES

Protect Respiratory YES

Chronic Indicator UNKNOWN

Contact Code UNKNOWN

Fire Code UNKNOWN
Health Code UNKNOWN

React Code UNKNOWN

SECTION X - Transportation Data 

SECTION XI - Site Specific/Reporting Information 

Volatile Organic Compounds (P/G) .4

Volatile Organic Compounds (G/L) 47.9355

SECTION XII - Ingredients/Identity Information 

Ingredient # 01

Ingredient Name NO INGREDIENTS LISTED ON MANUF. MSDS

CAS Number 1005

Proprietary NO

Percent 0

TEST RESULTS FOR FUME: SUPPRESSANT CERTIFICATION 

MCGEAN ROHCO'S DIS MIST NP 

IN DECORATIVE CHROME PLATING TANKS 

Prepared For: 

South Coast Air Quality Management District 

9150 Flair Drive 

Prepared By: 

Pacific Environmental Services Inc. 

150 East Foothill Blvd. 

Arcadia, CA. 91006 

(815) 357-1993 

- March 16, 1990 
, . 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Executive Summary .................................. -1 

Introduction ....................................... 2 

Equipment and Process Description .................. 4 

Testing Methodology ............................... 6 

Quality Assurance/Quality Control.. ................. 9 

Results of Source Tests,- .......................... 11 

Process Data Sheets .......................... Ap~endix 

Field Data Sheets ............................ Appendix 

Sample Recovery Sheets. ...................... Appendix 

Calculation Sheets .......................... Appendix 

Lab 2esults ..,............................... Appendix 

Chain of Custody Sheets ...................... Appendix 

Calibration Sheets ........................... Appendix 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

SCAQMD Rule 1169, adopted June 3, 1988 and amended 

September 8, 1989, requires all decorative chrome 

plating operations in the District to demonstrate 

emission reductions of 95% or stack emission rates 

below 0.15 mg/amp-hour as of November 1, 1989. Further 

reductions are required in 1990 and 1992 for facilities 

with substantial emi ssions. The Metal Finishing 

Association of Southern California (MFASC) has offered 

to provide data on the efficiency of fume suppressants 

for preventing 'emissions of chromic acid mists. 

SCAQMD has indicated that data from such tests 

would be accepted if the tests are conducted in 

accordance with SCAQMD requirements. The extent of the - 

emission reduction in terms of a percentage of 

uncontrolled tank emissions must be clearly 

demonstrated for each anti-mist additive by multiple 

tests on full scale plating tanks. Once the additive 

is certified by the SCAQMD, the emission reductions 

will be acknowledged if the additive is used in 

accordance with the manufacturer's directions. 

This report provides source test data and results 

on the efficiency of McGean Rohco, Inc.'s, anti-,mist 

additive, Dis Mist NP, in controlling chromic acid 

emissions from decorative chrome plating tanks. After 

6 days of testing a decorative chrome plating tank 

under uncontrol led and control 1 ed conditions, it was 

found that the average efficiency of Dis Mist NP in 

control ling chromic acid emissions was 99.73% for total 

chrome and 99.84% for hexavalent chrome. 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

1 
INTRODUCTION 

Pacific Environmental Services (PES), a 

participant in CARB's Independent Contractor Program, 

was contracted by McGean Rohco, Inc., to perform source 

testing to determine the efficiency of McGean Rohco's 

Dis Mist NP, in reducing chromic acid emissions from 

decorative chrome plating tanks. Two tests per day 

were conducted for a three day period on uncontrolled 

emissions from a decorative chrome plating tank, and 

two tests per day were conducted for a three day period 

on the emissions from the--same plating tank with Dis 

Mist NP added to the plating solution. Test dates were 

February 20 - February 22, 1990 for the uncontrolled 

tests and February 27 - March 1, 1990 for the tests 

with Dis Mist NP. 

In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the 

anti-mist additive Dis Mist NP, it was necessary to 

have a host decorative chrome plating tank outfitted 

with an emission collection system. Facilities were - 

made available by Mr. Harry W. Levy, President of 

Gene's Plating blorks, 3498 E. 14th Street, Los Angeles, 

%A. Earnest McClellan, Plant Manager, provided 

assi stance with tank operati on during source testing. 

The sampling location for the tests was in the 12,.75" 

I.D. tank exhaust duct for Tank #42, before the 

emissions passed through any air pollution control 

equipment. The sample location and tank diagram are 

shown in Figure 1. 

Source tests were conducted by M.J. Simon and S.G. 

Parks of PES, under the direction of M.D. High, Vice 

President of PES. Sam Oguntulu of SCAQMD was present 

during most days of testing to observe test conditions. 

Gary Wannlund and Ed Ong of McGean Rohco, Inc. were 

present during the testing to make additions of Dis 

Mist NP to the decorative chrome plating solution and 

to measure the surface tension of the plating bath. 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

2 

EQUIPMENT AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION 

Gene's Plating Works, 3498 E. 14th Street, Los 

Angeles, CA.. 90023 is engaged in the bus,iness of 

decorative chrome plating. Tests of chromic acid 

emissions were performed on decorative chrome plating 

Tank #42. The dimension-s of Tank #42 were 5'L x 3'W x 

4'D. 

Before the tests were initiated, a smoke tube was 

used to check the collec-t-ion efficiency of the Tank #42 

emission collection system. No fugitive emissions were 

observed. 

Two-tests each were conducted using applied 

amperages of approximately 800, 1300, and 2300 for both 

uncontroll ed and control led conditions (a total of 

twelve tests). Voltage was 6.0 - 7.0 volts D.C.. It 

was supplied by a smaller rectifier for the low and 

medium load conditions and by a larger rectifier for - 

the high load condition. Amp-hours were recorded from 

the amp-hour m'eter for the low and medium loads for use 

in subsequent calculations. During the high load test 

the larger rectifier could not be hooked up properly to 

the amp-hour meter so the amp-hours were calculated by 

the number of wheels used, the amperage used during 

plating, and the average time of plating. 

In order to obtain repeatable current consumption, 

identical loads were plated during the controlled and 

uncontrolled tests. For the low load tests, one wheel 

was plated at a time for a duration of 60-70 seconds. 

A total of 45 wheels were plated for each low test. 

During the medium load test an additional dummy wheel 

was placed in the tank and plated along with the 45 

wheels. For the high load test two additional dummy 

wheels were placed in the tank and plated along with 

the 45 wheels. 

Duri ng testing, tank temperature was mai ntained at 

100 degrees Fahrenheit. Freeboard height was 

myintained at 8.5" for all tests. The chromic acid 

concentration was measured at 23.0 ozlgal. 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

4 
For 

suppressa 

The manuf 

suppressa 

reduced s 

74.8 dyne 

the 

nt m 

actu 

nt i 

urfa 

slsa 

control led emission te 

anufacturer provided t 

rer's representative, 

n quantities sufficien 

ce tension in the plat 

uare centimeter. A re 

sts, the fume 

he fume suppressant. 

Ed Ong, installed 

t to maintain a 

i ng solution below 

cord of chemical 

addi tibns and surface tension measurements is included 

in the Appendix as part of the test data. Surface 

tension results at the beginning and end of each test 

are shown below: 

Test L o a d 

DMRlO Low L.oad 

DMRll Low Load 

Surface Tension 

dyneslsquare centimeter 

- 

DMR13 . Medium Load 70.2-74.8 

DMRl4 Medium Load 70.2-73.2 

DMR16 High Load 71.7-74.8 

DMR17 High Load 71.7-74.8 

Dis Mist NP is a liquid fume suppressant used to 

reduce drag-out losses and chromic acid mist generated 

during the course of decorative chromium plating. Dis 

Mist NP reduces the solution surface tension, thus 

reducing the spray and mist which would either. be 

thrown into the atmosphere, or drawn up into the 

exhaust hoods. The reduced surface tension also allows 

better drainage of racks and parts. 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

5 
TESTING METHODOLOGY 

PES used the proposed test method of CARB Method 

425, dated July 7th, 1989, for sampling the chrome 

emissions. Sampling locations, velocities, volumetric 

flow rate, and moi sture content determinations were 

done in accordance with CARB Methods 1, 2, and 4. As 

specifi.ed by CARB Method 1, 12 sampling points were 

used. 

The sample was extracted through a glass nozzle, a 

nonheated 20" glass-line3 stainless steel probe, a 10 

foot teflon hose from the probe to the first impinger, 

two Greenburg-Smith impingers each with 100 ml of 0.1N 

sodium hydroxide solution, an empty impinger, a glass 

filter holder, an impinger filled with silica gel, a 25 

foot umbilical line, a vacuum pump, a dry gas meter, 

and a calibrated orifice connected to an inclined 

manometer (Figure 2). Teflon coated glass fiber 

filters with 0.3, 0.1, and 0.035 micron pore, layers 

were used in the filter holders. 

The length of each test was 120 minutes. Sample 

sizes ranged from 97 to 120 cubic feet depending on the 

nozzle size used and the measured stack gas velocities. 

Field data were recorded on field data sheets during 

each test (Appendix). Leak checks were performed before 

and after each test. 

The volume of the impinger solution and the weight 

of the silica gel was recorded before and after the 

tests in order to obtain the moisture content of the 

stack gas stream. The contents of the impingers were 

placed in 500 ml. polyethylene containers and the 

sampling train from the impingers to the nozzle was 

rinsed 3 times with a 0.1 N sodium hydroxide solution 

and added to the same containers. Filters were placed 

in other polyethylene bottles and analyzed separately. 

The samples were kept at 60 degrees Fahrenheit or less 

during and after the tests prior to the analyses in 

,order 'to prevent deterioration of hexavalent chrome to 

total chrome. 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

6 
- 

1. Glass or stainless steel sampling nozzle 

2. Stainless steel probe sheath 

3. Stainless steel, glass, or Teflon-1 ined probe 

4. Type S pitot tube and manometer for AP readings 

5. Stack temperature sensor 

6. 15 ft. teflon probe line with ball and socket connectors 

8. Greenburg-Smith impinger with 100 ml. of .1 N NaOH 

Filter holder with teflon-lined glass fiber filter 

1. Modi fied Greenburg-Smi th impinger fi 1 led with 200 grams 

of si 1 ica gel 2* Impinger case filled with ice 

3. Impinger exit gas temperature sensor 

4. Umbilical line to meter box 

By-pass valve to adjust AH 

8. Leak free vacuum pump 

9* Dry gas meter 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC 

FIGURE2 n:.--.- nc r.--i:,- T-,:, 
Laboratory analyses were conducted by Thermo 

Analytical Laboratory in Clonrovia, California. 

Analyses for total chrome used atomic absorp'ti on 

spectrophotometry and analyses for hexavalent chrome 

used diphenylcarbazide colorometric techniques. The 

detection level of the analytical procedure for 

hexavalent chrome, Cr 6, and total chrome, Cr T, were 

0.003 and 0.001 mg/l respectively. Total chrome is 

easier to measure and detection levels can be reduced 

to lower levels than those possible for hexavalent 

chrome. Total chrome analyses serve as a back-up and 

qua1 i ty control check for hexavalent chrome 

concentrations. 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

8 
QUALITY ASSURANCEIQUALITY CONTROL 

A1 1 sampli ng devices were constructed and 

calibrated as specified in EPA reference Methods 2 and 

5 of 40 CFR 60, APTD-0576, and APTD-0581. The meter 

box was not moved from the site during the test series. 

It was calibrated before and after the tests to make 

sure that the gas meter correction factor remained 

within tolerance during the tests. 

To ensure that the sampling trains were clean for 

each day of testing, all glassware and probe lines were 

cleaned with 0.1 normal nitric acid solution, 0.1 

normal sodium hydroxide solution, di stilled water, and 

acetone. The sampling trains were then capped until 

the next tests. 

To demonstrate that the sampl i ng trains remained 

free from contamination, a field train blank was run 

for each. day of testing. An extra sampling train was 

taken to- the site each day. and placed near the actual 

sampling train. The sample from the field train blank 

was retrieved along with samples from the trains used 

for the tests. Results showed that the amount of 

hexavalent chrome in the trains wa.s below detectable 

amounts and that the average amount of total chrome was 

below 0.010 mg/li ter for the liquid -sample and below 

2.9 micrograms for filter samples (Table 1). - Trai.n 

blank results were used ,to correct the values for the 

test resul-ts. 

Extra Fare was used during sample retrieval. 

Clean rubber stoppers were used to cap the trains. 

Each sampling train was rinsed three times with 0.1 

normal sodium hydroxide solution after the each test 

and these rinses were added to the respective sample. 

Di sposabl e rubber gloves were worn during sample 

retrieval to help el iminate contamination. A1 1 sample 

volumes and weights were recorded immediately on sample 

recovery sheets during charging and sample recovery. - 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
FIELD TRAIN BLANK RESULTS ............................................. 

TEST I) IQU ID LIQUID FILTER FILTER. 

DATE Cr6 CrT Cr6 CrT ....................................................................... 

Average r 0. 003 rng/lJ 0.010 mg/l . (0.5 ug. 2.9 ug 

The value of 0,0015 rrrg/l was used for purposes of .correctingtest values. 
RESULTS OF SOURCE TESTS 

Calculations were made from the field data sheets 

to determine sample volume, moisture content, molecular 

weight, velocities, and flow rates of the exhaust gas 

stream. Results are shown on the emission test 

calculation sheets (Appendix). 

LOW LOAD 

Tests DMR-1 & DMR-2, conducted on the uncontrolled -- 

tank with an average amperage of 328 showed an 

emissions rate of 5.68 mglamp-hour for total chrome and 

4.28 mglamp-hour .for hexavalent chrome (Table 2A and 

2B). - 

Tests DMR-10 & DMR-11, conducted with Dis Mist NP 

and with an average amperage of 371, showed an 

emissions rate of 0.021 mglamp-hour for total chrome 

and 0.010 mg/amp-hour for hexavalent chrome (Table 5A 

and 5B). 

From these results the reduction benefit of Dis 

Mist NP for decorative plating conditions with nominal 

amperages of 800 was calculated. Results showed a 

reduction of 99.63% for total chrome and 99.77% 

respectively for hexavalent chrome (Table 8). 

MEDIUM LOAD 

Tests AMT-4 & AMT-5, conducted on the uncontrolled 

tank with an average amperage of 453 showed an 

emissions rate of 4.75 mglamp-hour for total chrome and 

4.00 mglamp-hour for hexavalent chrome (Table 3A and 

38). 

Tests DMR-13 & DMR-14, conducted with.Dis Mist NP 

and with an average amperage of 451, showed an 

emissions rate of 0.00 mglamp-hour for total chrome 

(after correcting for the blank) and 0.003 mglamp-hour 

for hexavalent chrome (Table 6A and 6B). 

I 

! PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

11 
From these results the reduction benefit of Dis 

Mist NP, for decorative plating conditions with nominal . 

amperages of 1300 A was calculated. Results showed a 

reduction of 100.0% total chrome and 99.93% 

respectively for hexavalent chrome (Table 8). 

HIGH LOAD 

Tests DMR-7 & DMR-0, conducted on the uncontrolled 

tank with an average amperage of 919 showed an 

emissions rate of 2.55 mg/amp-hour for total chrome and 

2.44 mg/amp-hour for hexavalent chrome (Table 4A and 

48). 

Tests DMR-16 & DMR-17, conducted with Dis Mist NP 

and with an average amperage of 994, showed an 

emissions rate of 0.011 mg/amp-hour for total chrome 

and 0.004 mg/amp-hour for hexavalent chrome (Table 7A 

and 78). 

From these res-ults the reduction benefit of Dis 

Mist NP for decorative plating conditions with nominal 

amperages of 2300 A was calculated. Results showed a 

reduction of 99.57% for total chrome and 99.84% for 

hexavalent chrome (Table 8). 

SUMMARY 

When Dis Mist NP was used in the decorative chrome 

plating solution in quantities to keep the surface 

tension between 63.0 and 74.8 dynes/square centimeter, 

hexavalent chrome emissions were reduced by an average 

of 99.84% for plating loads between 800 and 2300 

amperes. 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL 

12 

SERVICES, INC. 1 
03 

C'J 

Y, 

I 

J 1 

0 I w-2- l 2 -1 IIE U I 

ITW m 1 QCU I mw- I 

r I 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTACSERVICES, INC. 

13 
C I C 

x I - lr 0 I cr1 

U WI .* rS. 

9 1 L 

0 I ca 3 ' 

WI. 

A I I 

_I I 

0 I 

lr C I ,:=. Z I 

I 

c;. 

O I 

w 

Z I 1 x I - I '2. - ZIU- rn a I .-.. C 

- I .3 01 m.3 L I T'.,CCE 

13 1 ."OU lr I I'.JZZZ - ! 

L L 

aJCIBC 

CP '3 nn .A 

E E .3 L .4 L- 

. U nu La. U, 

f .L' L2 U 

.- .- .3 .- .3 -3 

01- 01'- L AX Y w-CIA 

iT .L u rz .u 0 0 LCLC 

CL TJ .- 13 

- . ,. - 13 

I IC iiL 

x >Tz + U u L.6'1 

I.." ' C 

I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

14 
C C .4 LU .* nn - nu LPL 

UYY 

razz. .- _. 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. I 
'.p Ln

"aI 

LIT 1 13. ,..3 1 C'., 

. I a I c'., 

J I 

0 I u=r- I 

2 -1 LU U I 

ZWUI I 

<CU I 

rnw- I 

I '=L - IS- -. "3 

C - 'U u, .4 

r'4CCE 

-.or~u 

87.4 = z = 

LIT 

z, 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

i 16 
LY L-4 0 Ln CTI U1 + la, ..- m d .A> 

LU '+ w '+ L i: +l Ill 42 LLI fT 2 

I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
I - , t . .., 

, .. .- . ... :. . .. -..:. I..'. 


I.' '. . ... 

L 

8. v.. ... . . . 

!::.:; 

. .. , 

$.. 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

2 1 

I PACIFIC SERVICES. INC. 
WI. wu- 1 CllCT ml 4E I WW b 1 w12m =.=- I 

I 

a .rT I 

I 

ffl ffl 

L L 

WCWC 

ET .. CT '4 

C C 

.rl L ... L 

nwnw 

EU CSU .d - .rl A 

.d -3 

w- LY- L L Y w4 w L- AEUEU 

0 0 - LCLC 

0- 0 

.;z. rD 

.c. 

.-, 

0 

U3 - 

3 

,3 

u-, CT 

U-J 

WWNW 

nn-~ 

EEL== 

1.0 ID 111 .n cn rn cn cn 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
I 

D. 1 t3 In1 0- 

UY I u-l r., I 8: 4 

I 

I 

2 _I -_I LL. LLT ALL-z. w I I+- I I+ r-- I-- 0 ra 4, '3 La .- I +- *z I-c r~ I I I I 

II lX I- E IS + !.+ _..x zz rlrJ E x rn C1 P LU 

.XI 

DRW + C 

I I 

\, PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

23 
I -1. M - I 

I.. I TI - 

I 

I 

I 

I 

LI-, I r.7 .3 1 ,=. I .c, r5 1 $3 .=. I 0 

. I 

0 ] 03 

1 i 0 I 

W>- 1 1 -1 aCT U I 

XZW Ln 1 CCCD I mw- 1 sz I 

I 

b-l .=. IJJ 

C. 

*i 

1 

I 

I 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. 

24 
i ' 

I .- I... 

m 4 

In U3 

d'd' 

I 

Ecl m Lo1 Ec 

md' 

4 m 

mm 
The field tests were conducted by M. J. Simon and 

S.G. parks. Study direction and report preparation were under the supervisfon of M. Dean Hfgh, Vice 

President of Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. 

pprove: 3nt-iv 

I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

26 
APPENDIX 
Plant: prsl < PhdIk Works 

Date : 3-30 -tin 

Source/Sampl e Number: flA.Ak! - % 

2, Volume Hater Vapor Colleoted, Standard Conditions 

Vlo = - 13.3 condensate from irnpingers and Silica Gel 

Yu(at4) = ,04707 Vro = o . .' 6% aaf 

3, Percent Moisture, by volume 

4. ~olecular W~ighf, Stack gas 

Dry Molecular Night 

Md = 0. 440 (% COa) + 0,320 (X 02) + 0.280. (X,Na + % CO) 
Pl ant: 

Date: 

Source/Saapl e Number: _ f-d 

5, Stack .Gas . . ' Velocity Average 

6 , Stack Yolumetric Flow Rate, Aotual Conditions (Stack 

Temperature and Pressure) I 

7. Stack vo1uinetri.o flow rate, standard oonditioae (680 8, 29.92. 

Hgl 

8. 'Isokinetia Variation 
! i. 

1. 

I:. 

SAMPLE RD20VERY DATA. 

Plant: Gc-evs P\q*; 4 \ L~)*\<S 4 

Date: 2-20 --q0 

Sampling Location: TA~Y 47 Scq3s~:~n ?Id~H~ , 

Sample Type: c ARB mGWoa ~ZS - CHIXW~ - 

Run Nunber: D~R-~ 

Sample Box Number: GB 

clean-up Man: Bclv~,~ - SL 

Job Number: 3 q gc 

Comments : 

FRONT HALF 

Filter Number: bm- IF 

Description of Filter: D?-7 

ImpingeFinal Volume: 10% m 1 90 m 1 i ml 

Initial Volume: 1 O0 ml 100 ml 0 ml 

Ne t Volume r m 1 m 1 ml 

Total H20: V 

Silica Gel 

Final Volume: D g 9 9 

Initial Volume 646 9 9 

Net Volume Q 

Total Moisture: 

Description of Impinger Catch: C)- 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
Plant GLPE'S j71.A-IIh)~, ;A&.\<c; 

Date -Z -20 - ?n 

Sampling Location TIJLCT OJCT 

sample Type c4eR 425 Ct-lj?or~G 

RunNumber Db~-z 

Operator 3,\ wed 

Ambient Temperature 6 TUF 

Barmetric Pressure 3;> ,s8 

Static Pressure (Pa -z.6 *H?O 

Filter Number(e) wmf= 

Pretest Leak Rate -- cfm B (1.0 in. Hg 

Pre tea t Pi tot Leak Check 0.19. 

Pretest Oreat Teak Check -~~-. 

Read a4 Record all Data EXery 10 Mikutee' . - 

Schematic of 

I 

Probe Length and Type Zo 'q\qss-,:,. , 1 ss 

Pitot Tube I.D. No. C-Tm 

.a ., , , Nozzle 1.n. No. i ~IA-TF~ ' &'by P . - --.. IV I 

Assumed Nois ture , t 1 , o 

Temp. Readout S/N U .4 , 

Meter Box Number I k 

Meter bllg 2.13 

C Factor t.7~ 

Meter Gamma I ,,-. .-1'7 . fieater BoxSettinq N.A. < 

Reference Ap +&&+ 0.5-0 

Post Test Leak Rate =or010cfm @ (ban. fig 

Post Test Pi tot Leak ~?leck ".I(. 

Traverse Point Layout Post %st Orsat Leak Check Q 4 . 
Plant: LEN '5 c PMW6 

Date: r) 

Source/Sampl e Number: 

2. Volume Hater Vapor Colleoted, Standard Conditions 

Ylo = .a noodensate from irnpingers and Silioa Gel 

v~(~t4) = ,04707 V~O = . -6) 70 aof 

I.. :.. 

... 

I . .: I-:.. 

3, Percent Moisture, by volume 

4. Holecular Heiqht, Staok gas 

Dry Molecular Hight 
Plant: 

Date:. 

Source/Sampl e Number: Y)/lA/? - 2 

5, Stack Gas Yelooity Average 

6. Staok YolurnetriC Flow Rate, Aotual Conditions (Staok Tent~erature and Pressure) I 

7. Staok yolu~netric flow rate, standard oonditiom (680 B, 28.82 

Hs) 

8. 'Isokinetio Variation 
SAMPLE RE2OVERY DATX 

Plant: Ge-e'~ f'\~*; dy W*\<s 4 

Date : 2-'2-0-40 

Sampling Location: TA~JY 47 SCR~BDER -LPJU=-T 

Sample Type: c ARB MEWon 92~ CH)~W~ - 

Run Number: DmR- 2 

sample Box Number: 4% 

Clean-up Manr ~ack< - S- - 

Job Number : 3 7 gs 

Comments : 

E'RONT HALF 

Filter NunSer: blu\R- I= 

Description of Filter: D?~7q I 

Impingers 

Final Volume: /c c! m1 @& m1 0 m 1 

~nitial Volume: 1 O0 ml 100 ml 

Net Volume: m 1 

Total H20: 

Silica Gel 

Final Volume : &J-?, if 9 g 9 

Initial Volume 6333 g 

Net Volume /4,(? 9 9 T: 

Total Moisture: 

Description of Impinger Catch: 

* PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
SAMPLE EDVERY DATA 

Plant: Ge-e1s P1-i 4, W-ls~ 

Date : 2 -Ye -4s - 

Sampling Location: TA~Y 4-2 SC~~BBER -L~J~-J 

Sample Type :-- c ARB MEWan e2~ c~nc;l.\tr/ 

Run Number: DIW~GL k~ ir) 

Sample Box Number: 18 

Clean-up Manr PW~S- Sh 

Job Number: 3qg5 

FRONT HALF 

Filter Nuober: bNR- 3 I= 

Description o f . F i l t e r : 

MOISTURE 

Impi nge rs 

Fi nal Volume : (00 m 1 [ud m 1 0 rn 1 

ml 100 Lril 

c3 Initial Volume: 1 ml 

Net Volume: m 1 m 1 rnl 

Total H20: 0 

Silica Gel 

Final. Volume : 1,6Z1( g 9 9 

Initial Volume 6/,240 g 9 g 

Net Volume g Q g 

Totdl Moisture: 0. \ 

Description of Impinger Catch: I 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. I 
FIELD DATA 

plant Gerre'~ PLQ-~;~ 4r)srh~ 

Date 2-I\- 70 I I 

Sampling Locatiorl r4uk 4-2 SC~~U~R W 

Sample Type mug /Mbfjjo~ f?< cI-)Rofi 

Run Number bmg-4- 

operator 5J/Yl@/tj 

Ambient Temperature 5°F 

Barane tric Pressure 30.00 1' (+a - 

Static Preesure (Pe -2, 15'1f-+,c3A 

Filter Number (8) DMR-YF 

Pretest Leak Rate =O.co7cfm @ /,c in. Hg c 

Pretest Pitot Leak Check 0. c.(r- - Pretest Orsat T~ak Check 40. 6 

Read ard Record all Data Every & Minutes 

Schematic of 

Traverse Point Layout - 

Probe Length and Type ~a''(2~.rr~;y~ 

Pitot Tube I.U. No. 5-'3A 

Nozzle I.D. NO. i ~,AU~~U 07p Aseumed Hoieture, s 1- 0 1 

Temp. Readout S/N fi .A 

Meter Box Number I 

U. 

A 

Meter All@ 2.t3 

C Factor 1-20 

Meter Gamma \*0\l 

lleater Box Setting N.A. 

Reference Ap O.?L 

Poet Test Leak Rate =O&Dcfm @ IZ,oin. lig 

Post Test Pi tot Leak Check AX. 

U. 

Meter All@ 2.t3 

Meter Gamma \*0\l 

Reference Ap O.?L 

Poet Test Leak Rate =O&Dcfm @ - (Loin. lig 

- .. Post Teat Orsat Leak Check d.A. 

- dm, eF&Jhe& *- 
Plant: 2-2 1-40 

Pkfi~ 

Date : 

Source/Sampl e Number: o4R-Y 

2. Volume Water Vapor Colleated, Standard Conditions 

Vlo = aa. 4 oondensate from inpingera and Silica Gel 

vw(atd) = ,04707 Vlo = - /,fig sof 

3, Percent Moisture, by volume 

4. Molecular Weiqht, Stack gas 

Dry Molecular Wight 

Md = 0.440 (% CO2) + 0,320 (X 03) + 0,280 (X,Na + % CO) 
Plant: &EKE '5 pL+iM 

Source/Sarnpl 

Date:. L-Y6 

e Number: , fl~R-5' 

5. Stack Gas Velooity Average 

6. Staoh VolurnetriC Flow Rate, Aotual Conditions (Staok 

Temperature and Pressure) I 

7. Staok volurnetrio flow rate, standard oonditlone, (680 8, 28.82 

Hrr) 

Q(atd)= 17,64 Qo (1-8~8) b = 

T8 

Qiat~) = 17,64(5&~ )(i -om)( 12q6gq I-- 

Qstd = ,- dsofm 

8. 'Isokinetio Variation 
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA 

Plant: Ge*e'~ P\4t; .r.\ a*\<s 

Date : *2- z\-yo 

Sampling Location: TA~K 42SCSJBBER -L~JL~T 

. Sample Type: . C RRS . MEW'O~. '?-2 - s c~17&g 

D~R- 'q . . Run Number: 

Sample Box. Number: 

E'RONT KAtF 

Filter Nunber: ~MR- 4 F 

'~escription of Filter: G C'eV 

/i 

Impingers 

Final Volume : 8'55 m 1 /4/ ml 3 m 1 

Initialvolume: loo ml 100 ml 0 ml 

Ne t Volume : -4s nl -t L/ f ml -f 3 ml 

& Totdl HZOx 

Silica Gel 

Final Volume: 6CS.f 9 g 

Ini ti a1 Volume 64-1 .T 9 9 9 

Net Volume 

Description 'of Impinger Catch: C(ec,- 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
G Fh!~, PLL,. Plant: I 

J - 

Date: a-j-qc> 

Source/Saaple Number: &AR-C; 

vrn(atd), =. - linla3 dscf 

2. Volume Hater Vapor Colleoted, Standard Conditions 

Vla = . /LI~ oondensate from impinsera and Slllaa Gel 

3. Percent Moisture, by volu~e 

Bus = 

4. Molecular. Heic~ht, Staok gas 

Dry Molecular Wight 

Md = 0,440 (% COa) t.0.320 (X Oa) + 0.280 (X,.b + % CO) 

Md = 0.440( )+ 0.320( I)+ 0.280( ) 

M* = 29-0 lb/lb-mole ' 
Plant: GPrp15 4z+h1 

Date: . rC 

u 

Source/Sanpl e Number: 

5, Stack Gas Velooity Average 

6, Stack Volumetric Flow Rate, Aotual Conditions (Stack 

Ternperatur.8 and Pressure) 4 

7. Stack voluioetrio flow rate, standard oonditlons (680 B, 20.82 

Hg) 

. - 2635 dsofrn 

I 

Qstd = 

8, 'Isokinetio Variation 
SAMPLE RE20VERY DATA 

Plant: Ge-e8s f'\*~; 4 y 

4 

Date: .Z-Z\-?OSampling Location: TAN 42 SCSJBG€R X~JLL~~ 

Sample Type : -- 

- C AR8 MEW~~ 4-25 CNR&K 

Run Number: DMR- !i 

Sanple Box Number: 28 

Clean-up Man; SI /L) 

Job Number: 3 q %< 

Comments : 

FRONT HALF 

Filter Number: bm- F' 

Description of Filter: G ' Y 

Lnpingers 

Final Volume: 108 ml 92 m 1 t ml 

D ~nitialvolume: loo ml 100 ml ml 

Net Volume: ml . ml J/ m 1 

Total H20: 

Silica Gel 

Final Volume : 703.3 9 9 9 

~nitial~olume '637,t 9 51 9 

Net Volume cE7C 

v- 9 

Totdl Moisture: 

Description of Impinger Catch: .c~.ehs 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
FIELD DATA 

. - 

C 

Sampling Location rjdk a 

Sample Type CARB p@ 

Ambient Temperature '7i) r - 

Darcxnetric Pressure 2 <) tP+7']jc 

Static Pressure (PSI - 2,'6''lIt0 

Filter Number(s) 

Pretest Leak Rate - ~.o/Zcfrn - @ in. Hq 

Pretest Pi tot Leak Check 0. k 

Heter Allg 

C Factor 1-20 

Meter Gamma I*o\'l 

tleater Box Setting &.A- < 

Reference Ap r 6 r.) 

Post Test Leak Rate =ccl\cfm - @ !.?-in. llg -. 

Pretest Oreat I~ak Check - N. fi Schematic of Post Test Pi tot Leak Check 

Read and Record all Data Every /O Minutes Traveree Point Layout Post Teat Orsat Leak Check AI.A- 
FIELD DATA 

Date 

Samplirlg .Location rep.jk 4-2 SC~~S~FQ w- I 

Rur~ Number ~MR-% 

operator SIMQ~ 

Ambient Temperahre xac,F 

Barme tric Pressure 9-5l .f4/' 1-14 

static ~reasure (pa) --2,3.*'/4;5 

Filter Number(s1 pfi&- $e 

Pretest Leak Rate -0~~cfrn @&din. Hg 

Pretest PitDt Leak Check 0.l~~ 

Pretest Orsat leak Check pl. A - 

nead ard Record a11 Data Every - (0 Minutes 

I 

Sclhema t lc of 

Traverse Point Layout - 

Probe Lerlgtl~ and Type T~''Q r,sr~;4 5 tG; ,les Pi tot Tube 1.1). 140. - '5-2 --. A 

Nozzle I.D. NO. i ba*uTE~ 4 o P 

Asaumed Hois ture, \ 1. o 

Temp. Readout S/N ,u .A 

Heter .Box Number I A 

Heter Alla 2-13 c! - 

C Factorll \ ~20 

Heter Ganima l.0\7 

lleater Box Settlng ju.A. 

Reference dp 0.w 

Poat fist Leak Rate =&g,?frn @ fO.dn. 114 

Post Test Pitot Leak Cl~eck OX - 

Poat ~ebt Orsat ~eak.CIleck ' &.A. 
Plant: Gewj- f/d,k~ 

Date: ,J-{-LFiO 

Source/Smpl e Number: OMR- 7 

- 

2. Yolurns Water Yapor Colleuted, Standard Conditions 

VL o = i47 oondensate from impingers and Silios Gel 

vucstd) = ,04707 Yio = 0.642 sof 

V~(8td) = --&&EL, mf 

3, Percent Moisture, by volume 

4 Molec~der Weight, Stack gas 

Dry kolecular Hight 
Plant: Ge. E '5 P/~Tx,di; 

Date: ,2-a340 . 

5ource/Sampl e Number: - 04 I?-? 

5, St.-,k as' Veloaity Average 

va iavt) = 85,49 Cp (w) ave 

6. Stack YolumetriC Flow Ratep AatuaP Conditions (Stack 

Tee-gerature and Pressure) I 

1 

7. S; -.cB voluinetrio flow rate, ~tandard oonditiona (680 8, 28.82 1 

H8) ! 

I 

Q,-cd)= 1?,64 Qe (l-a~~) b = i 

, 

Te I 

Q = ~0s)(~4~~7).( 37176) I i7,64 -w i 

dsofm 

i 

Qub6 = ~CO 1 i l a 

8 '1.: ~kinetio Vari ati on 
SAMPLE RE)=OVERY DATA 

plait: Gc-e's y\q+; 4 \ 

4 

a*\<& 

Date,: 2 - 2/-70 

Sampling Location: TArJY 4-2 . SCR~BEER xh1~67 

Samp'le Type : C ARTL MEW'on 2 ~~fl~t?? 

Run Number:. bm~- 6 ( BLwk ) 

Sample Box Number: 18 - 

- - 

Clean-up Man: Stmod - 

Job Number: 3 4 

Comments : 

FRONT HALF 

Filter Nunber: ~MR- 6 F 

Description Filter: 

HO I S TURE 

Impingezs 

Flnal Volume : / 06 ml 9 ml n 1 

Initialvolume: loo ml 100 ml ml 

Ne t Volume t m 1 m 1 rnl 

Silica Gel 

Final Volume : 6 44 -7 9 9 g 

mitialvolume ~4i.f -7 

g 9 9 

Nez Volune 9 S' 9 

Total Moismre: 

Description of Impinger Catch: ~IU. 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
FIELD DATA I 

plant c errc '5 PLQ+;~ C301- k* Probe Length and Type -LZ.L "a,,rr-(-y d 

Date s t*; PitotTutx 1.D.No. 5-3A 

Nozzle I.D. No. i, D,auTE~ 

Assumed Hoisture, \ 1. o 

4-;Lp 

Temp. Readout S/N ,U .A 

operator HeCer Box Number 1 A 

Mlbient Temperature - '7SUF Meter Allg -2.15 

Barmetric Pressure -$,q) C Factor 1.20 

Static Pressure (P,) - 2,T" /fZ0 EIJ~ +Ed LooklNt Meter Gamma 1.017 

Filter Number(s) IMP- / OF 7013hSD5 ~rk(~ lleater apx Setting N-ACF~, 15 lr~~i pfl%R\ ~eferencd Ap 0.d~ 

0. Post Test Leak Rate =d-@\&fin @ fD,oin. llg 

Pretest Oreat Teak Check @, A Scliematic of PostTest Pitot Leak~Gk 

Read an3 Record all Data Every (8 Minutes Traverse Point Layout Post Test Orsat Leak Check N.A. 
1 plant: PIk+/nq 

Date: w * ' Source/SEp?Ni!er: D/zilR-f 

2, Volume Water Vapor Colleated, standard Conditions 

VL E = 12.2 aonde~,ate from inpingers and Silica Gel 

YW(8td) - - 0.57(I scf 

3, Percent Moisture, by volume 

4. Molecular Wai9ht, Stack gas 

Dry Molecular Wight 

Ma = 0.440 (X COz) + 0. 320- (X Oa) + 0.280 (%,N2 + % CO) 

Me = Ma t Bus (18-Md) =( &q,0 )+( olC06 )(18- &?b ) 

Me = 'a3 ib/lb-mole 
Plant: i,p& PidfiYq 

Date: w 

Source/Sampl e Number: 

5,- Stack Gas Veloaity Average 

6 . Stack Volumetric Flow Rate Autual Goaditi osts (8ta~k 

Temperature and Pressure) I 

Q(8td) = 

Q~td = dsofm 

7. Staok volurnetrio flow gate, standardaonditloas (680 8, 29.92 

H~) 

.. . / 8. -1sokinetio Variation 

i 
SAMPLE RE2OVERY DATA 

Date: 2-2-2-40 

Sapling Location: TA~Y 42 SCR~BB~~ -rFJzf7 

Sanple Type : C ARB MEWcn 92r CH\~&K 

Run Nder: DmR- ASample Sox Number: / & " 

Clean-up Man: S\mod 

Job Nunber: 3q%c 

Comments: 

FRONT HALF 

Filter Number: bm- $ I= 

Description of Filter: 

HOISrn 

Impinge3 

Final Volume : /a 9 m 1 77 m 1 ml 

Initial Volume: to0 ml 100 ml ml 

Net Volume: m 1 $ ml ml 

Totdl H20: -16 

Silica Gel 

Final Volume: 1 0s .7 '3 9 9 

Ini ti a 1 Volume 677-5 Q Q g 

Nec Volune 

Total Moisture: 

Description of Impinger Catch: 

I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. I 
:IFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. 
.SAMPLE RD=OVEXY DATA 

Date: 2-72-5'0 

Sampling Location: TA~Y 7 SCR~BE€R -cdefT 

Sample Type: C RR8 MEWon 7-2-r CH\?&K - 

Run Number: DMR-$4 , 

sample ox NU^: 2 G [&-\4 

Clean-up Manx s\/n oIJ 

30bNumber: 3q85 

Comments : 

E'RONT HALF 

Filter Nuzber: ~MQ-q F 

'Description of Filter: 

Lmpingezs 

Final Volme: ID a ml ml 6 ml 

I ~ni ti a1 volume : 1 nil I 00 nil. o ml I 

Ne t Volume : 

TO tdl HZO: 

Silica Gel 

Final Volume: 6w-9 g 9 9 

Ini ti a 1 Volume tA??- < 9 g 9 

Net Volume g., 9 Q 

To til Moi s tur e : 

I Description of Lmpinger CaVh: 

I PACIFICENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. I 
5, Stack Gas Velooity Average 

6, Stack YolumetriC Flon RateD Aotual Conditions (Staok 

Temperature and Pressure) I 

Qs = 60 Vs A = 60 (9,~;)(0$$& ) 

26 S6 &e = &of m 

7. Staok volu~netric flow rate, standard oonditlons (680 8, 29.82 a H$) \ 

1 ' 

8, 'Isokinetia Yariatio.n 
Plant: GE~E's @in.hq 4 

Date: 9-27-40 

Source/Sampl e Number: ~NI /Q -I(? 

2. Yolurce Water vapor Colleoted, Btandard Conditions 

Y~o = , 4 condensate from irnpingers and Silloa Gel 

0, [8$ vu(std) = ,04707 Vlo = 60f 

3. Percsnt Moisture, by volume 

4. Molecular sight, Staak ges a 

Dry Molecular Hight 

Ma = 0.440 (X COa) + 0.320 (X. Oa) t 0.280 (X;Na * % CQ) 
I SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA 

plant: Gc*e'~ f'\qt; 4 \ W*\c5 4 

Date : 2- 2-2-70 

Sanpllng Location: -TA~Y 42 StTd%D€R zhlLL-)7 

Sample Type: C AR% ME7Hon 4-2s CHR~/'~~ - 

Run Number: D~U-? I Sample Box Number: q+% 

Clean-up Man: S\r\od 

Job Nunber : 34 5 

I Comments: T-P--u b~f- UGS LL- 5. ?.,-lo S- (1 

rc ws 5~ 7- UVC- - 

-07 I->-&- Fad3 5%-i -re .-d5?-~.' A\sa s%f;t3t pC& 1'- 

c".c r4, 3 I 

FRONT KALF 

Filter Number: ~PQ- I= 

~escrlption of Filter: 

Lmpir.ge,-s 1. Final Volume: 7'2 ml (12 ml # ml I I 

Ini ti 21 volume : 100 ml 100 !Id 0 

Net Volme: -,J2 ml +- 1-2 m 1 

Total H20: ~ 

Silica Gel 

Final Volume : 7'74; $ 9 9 9 

1nZtial Volume C85.1 9 

Net Volume /7 7 9 +5 

Total Moismre: 

I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. I 

I 

i 

I 

I 

I 

I 

i 

Description of Lmpinger Cakh: i 

I 
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA 

Plant: Gene's ?\&ti 4, W-\<s 4 

Date : C- 27 -4 0 

Sampling Location: TA~ t( 4-2 SCR~BB En zrl.~~=~T 

Sample Type: c RR% ME7Hon 7-2s CM\X&K 

Run Number: bmR - lo 

Sample Box Number: 36 

Clean-up Man: .!i\Md 

Job Nunber: 34%~ 

Comments : 

F'RONT RALT 

Filter Nunber: ~MR- t-rd-- 

Description of Filter: 

Zapi nge rs 

Finhi Volume: 90 ml 93 ml I m 1 

~nitial volume: 1 O0 ml 100 ml 0 d 

Net Volume: ml ml ml 

Total HZO: 

Silica Gel 

Final Volume : 64.t. 1 9 Q 9 

~ni ti a1 Volume 6'2-4.1 ., g Q. 9 

Net Volume - P 9 

Total Noistxre: 

Description, of Lmpinger Catch: .L ICW 

PAClFlC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

Pl ant: wf3 pL4+;* 

Date: .3 72 7- 40 J 

Source/Sampl e Number: OIAk -/ 1 

2 a Volume Hater Vapor Colleoted,, Standard Conditions 

VIO = d1.R oondensate from impingers and silica Gel 

vwcatct) = ,04707 lo = 6 016 802 

V~(atc) = /(026 SO^ 

3, Percent Moisture, by volume 

4. Molecclar -Weight, Stack gas 

Dry Molecular Night 

Mc = 0,440 (X COz) t 0,320 (% Oa) t 0,280 (X,.N2 + % CO) 

Md = 0.440( )+ 0.320( ,)+ 0.280( 

Md = .A Ib/lb-mole ' 

) 
~1 ant: ~P<C 3- ?iptii.o Date:. 4 -,4?4'0 1 

5ource/Sampl e Number: fl~e-// 

5, St ..-'ic Gea Yelooity Average . .. 

iave) = 85.49 Cp (q) BVg 

6. Stack Yolumetric Flow Rate, Autual Conditio~s (Stauk 

Te.-derature and Pressure) I 

7, S:.-.zk volurnetrio flow zatep standard oonditboll~4 (680 8, 29,92 El?) 

8, 'I.r,~kinetio Variation 
SAYPLE FLECOVERY DATA 

Plant: Ge*el~ Y\4*; 4q W*\<S d 

Date: 2-~q- 40 

Sampling Location: TA~Y 47 S~qdlf~En zr~~67 

Sample Type : c ARIL /L\€won 92s ~~\70/+\tr' 

Run Number: bmR- I\ 

Sample BOX Number: 38 

Clean-up Manr $\Mo~ - 

Job Nunher: 34%~ 

Connents : 

Filter Number: bMR- !\F 

Description of Filter: 

Impi ngem 

Findl Volume: 40 ml 110 m l I m l 

In1 ti a1 volune : 1 * ml 100 ml 0 ml 

Net Volume : m 1 m 1 m 1 

Silica Gel 

Find Volume: kt?. .B 9 9 F 

Initiel Volume ~4.0 a 

9 

Net Volume 9 

Total Moisture: 

Descziption of Impinger Cakh: C\PW 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 
SAMPLE RB2OVERY DATA 

Date : 

Sampling Location: -~A~JY 47 Scqd$Bgn -L~JL&~T 

Sanple Type: c RRTL MEWon P2* CH\?&~ - 

Run Nuher: DnR- /'a 

Sanpie %x Number: 

Clean-up Manr 

job Number: 3 q gc 

Comments : 

%ONT 'HALF' 

?il ter Nu&==: bMR-(2 F 

Description of Filter: 

up1 ngers 

Final Voluse : m l 100 ml ml 

Initialvolume: lo* . ml 100 ml ml 

Ner. Volume: nl ml ml 

Silicc Gel 

Flnrl Volume : (2578 g Q Q 

Ir.1 ti a1 Volume a G57,2 9 9 9 

Net Volune 9 9 9 

Tot& Moismre: 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.