alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 BEFORE THE

U.S. DEPARTME NT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC

Supplemental Comments On Application For Approval Of An Agreement (resolution 787) By The International Air Transport Association

Docket No. OST

- 2013

- 0048

Business Travel Coalition May 1 , 2013

The European Union And The United States Should Secu re IATA

Foundational Documents And Initiate Multi

- Jurisdictional Data Privacy

Stakeholder Consultation

The European Union Article 29 Working Party’s (WP29) transmitted a letter recently to the International Air Transport Association (IATA) regarding the “New Distribution Capability” (NDC) agreed by IATA airlines in t he form of IATA

Resolution 787. The WP 29 letter raised a number of privacy and human rights concerns about NDC, particularly travel er profiling after observing that under NDC, the airlines had the right to demand every traveler’s nationality, age, marital status, travel history, shopping history, purchase history, frequent flyer participation and whether a trip was for business or lei sure before quoting prices. Due to these concerns, the letter made clear that data protection authorities of the EU Member States would need to evaluate all potential impacts from NDC

and that WP 29 had placed NDC on its agenda.

As a first step in an expa nded review process , WP29 requested documentation

from IATA about i ts proposed new business model. WP29 is comprised of a data protection official from each EU Member State, the European Data Protection Supervisor and a representative from the EC. (The WP2 9 letter can be accessed at http://btcnews.co/12c9dVz.)

Many of the world’s airlines, travel distributi on system participants and organizations that purchase air travel services are global enterprises. As such, BTC calls on the U.S. Department of Transpo rtation (DOT), which is also reviewing NDC, and WP29 to avoid an inefficient data

- privacy review process, and possibly the beginning of a patchwork of new rules, and instead, to work together to harmonize the outputs of their respective reviews concerning the sorts of personal data, if any, that airlines can lawfully demand of travelers before quoting them airfares. A multi

- jurisdictional stakeholder consultation including privacy, consumer and travel groups from around the world would be an efficient,

incl usive and deliberative process to embrace.2 The pote ntial negative effects of NDC of less robust airline and distribution

channel competition and higher fares are only overshadowed by consumer privacy concerns voiced by travel industry participants and co nsumers from six continents. Privacy groups, like all other sta keholders, were locked out of the IATA process to develop its new worldwide business model to price and

distribute airline tickets. DOT and WP29 now have an opportunity to secure the input of o rganizations expert in data privacy issues and thoroughly vet the privacy implications of NDC. Critically important, both governmental organizations have a need to secure the foundational documents from IATA that would inform the purpose and intended effec ts of Resoluti on 787 and NDC.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

IN THE MATTER OF K.H., 

YOUTH IN NEED OF CARE. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

JUN 6 1985 

&Ll PI/! c/aar'-;don, 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

STATE OF MONTANA 

Due to the excessive lapse of time and in light of the 

singular importance of this matter this Court suspends the 

rules pursuant to Rule 3, M.R.App.Civ.P., and invokes its 

i-nherent supervisory powers. 

On November 26, 1984, the Rosebud County Attorney 

petitioned in District Court for intervention in a domestic 

relationship wherein K.H., a child, was allegedly being 

sexually abused. This petition was one for temporary 

investigative authority and protective services pursuant to § 

41-3-402, MCA. 

At the initial hearing on December 6, 1984, the 

affidavit supporting the petition was insufficient and the 

District Court ordered a new petition and affidavit be filed. 

Temporary custody of K.H. was awarded to the county welfare 

department. This order was an order for immediate protection 

of youth pursuant to § 41-3-403, MCA. 

At the second hearing, on December 17, 1984, with new 

petition and affidavit, the District Court found probable 

cause for State intervention and ordered temporary 

investigative authority until February 4, 1985. During this 

time, custody was in the mother and restrictions were placed 

on the father's visitation. 
The parents filed a notice of appeal on January 21, 

1985. The proceeding was properly placed in abeyance by the 

District Court because the notice of appeal removed 

jurisdiction from the District Court and vested it in this 

Court. 

We note that an order for temporary investigative 

authority and protective services may be an appealable order 

within Rule 1, M.R.App.Civ.P., particularly in the instance 

where a parent is deprived of custody. However, in such a 

case appeal will ordinarily not be an adequate remedy because 

of the time necessarily involved. Therefore, the relief of 

an aggrieved. party should properly be pursued through a writ 

of certiorari, habeas corpus, or supervisory control. 

The record before this Court is sufficient to render a 

decision and order. Both sides of this matter are adequately 

set forth. We hold that the proceedings at District Court 

are in substantial compliance with the applicable statutes 

and rules. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

The appeal shall be treated as a writ of certiorari. 

The writ is denied on the grounds that the District Court 

proceedings are in substantial compliance with 1a.w and the 

petitioners were not prejudiced thereby. 

The District Court shall conduct an adjudicatory hearing 

on the Matter of K.H at the earliest possible time. 

fl fl 

DATED this of June, 1985. 
/ Justices
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1105 

To repeal the rule entitled ‘‘Clean Water Rule: Definition of ‘Waters of 

the United States’ ’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To repeal the rule entitled ‘‘Clean Water Rule: Definition 

of ‘Waters of the United States’ ’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop WOTUS Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RULE RELATING TO WATERS OF THE 

6 UNITED STATES. 

7 The final rule entitled ‘‘Clean Water Rule: Definition 

8 of ‘Waters of the United States’ ’’, published on June 29, 

9 2015 (80 Fed. Reg. 37054), shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 66 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 

relating to savings arrangements established by States 

for non-governmental employees. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Labor relating to ‘‘Savings Arrangements 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 66 RDS 

1 Established by States for Non-Governmental Employees’’ 

2 (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 59464 (August 30, 2016)), 

3 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
ghmp_ex108.htm

EXHIBIT 10.8
  
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 (Commercial)
  
 	 U.S. $100,000  
	 July 22, 2019


 
  
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, LONE STAR GOLD, INC. (Borrower) promises to pay to Mainstar Trust Custodian FBO Chris P. Chumas IRA,or order, (Note Holder) the principal sum of $100,000 U.S. Dollars, with interest on the unpaid principal balance from the date of this Note until paid, at the rate of 8% per annum.
  
 This Note, together with all accrued but unpaid interest, shall be due and payable on December 31, 2019
  
 Principal and interest shall be payable at the office of the Note Holder, or such other place as the Note Holder may designate.
  
 Payments received for application to this Note shall be applied first to the payment of costs and expense of collection and/or suit, if any, second to the payment of accrued interest specified above, and the balance applied in reduction of the principal amount hereof.
  
 If this Note is not paid when due, the Note Holder shall be entitled to all reasonable costs and expense of collection and/or suit, including, but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees.
  
 Borrower may prepay the principal amount outstanding under this Note, in whole or in part, at any time without penalty.
  
 Borrower and all other makers, sureties, guarantors, and endorsers hereby waive presentment, notice of dishonor and protest, and they hereby agree to any extensions of time of payment and partial payments before, at, or after maturity.
  
 	 	LONE STAR GOLD, INC.	
	 	 	 	 
		By:	/s/ William Alessi	
	  
	  
	 William Alessi,
 Chief Executive Officer
# CE2004065EN.01023502.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/235 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/235

---

(2004/C 65 E/251)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2872/03

by Margrietus van den Berg (PSE) to the Council

(22 September 2003)

Subject:   Salvaging of the ferry Le Joola

Subject:

A year ago, the ferry Le Joola sank off the coast of Senegal. 1 863 people were drowned, including dozens of Europeans. To this day, the ferry remains on the seabed together with the bodies of the victims. Despite lobbying by their families and friends and by the European Parliament, the ship has still not been salvaged. President Wade of Senegal recently agreed that he would cease to oppose its salvaging. However, there is no money to pay for it. It is very important to the families and friends of the dead that the ferry should be salvaged, so that they can take proper leave of their loved ones.

What has the Council done in the past year to promote the recovery of the bodies of these African and European citizens? Does not the European Union, and hence the Council, have a moral duty to coordinate the salvage operation in cooperation with Senegal? Will the Council do nothing to help the families and friends of the dead, and the dead themselves? What can the Council still do?

Reply

(17 November 2003)

(17 November 2003)

Council Regulation 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning the provision of humanitarian aid does not cover the provision of aid to the families of the victims from the unfortunate sinking of the Le Joola, as recalled by Commissioner Nielsen in its response to the Written Parliamentary question E-3166/02 (15 January 2003).

The European Union has not been approached by the Senegalese authorities to help refloat the Joola. The EU has not extended any direct financial assistance to the victims and their families but it provides regular aid to Senegal from the European Development Fund. The European Investment Bank is considering providing a contribution (in co-operation with Germany) to the complete re-establishment of the maritime line between Dakar and Ziguinchor, interrupted due to the accident.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

MATTSON TECHNOLOGY, INC.  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I,
Ludger Viefhues, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mattson Technology, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: May 6, 2005 |  | /s/LUDGER VIEFHUESLudger Viefhues Executive Vice PresidentFinance
and Chief
Financial Officer
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 24.11




                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

                         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS

     WHEREAS, ALCAN INC., a Canadian corporation (the "Company"), proposes
shortly to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the
provisions of the Securities Act of 1934 as amended (the "Act"), the Annual
Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act.

     WHEREAS, the undersigned is an Officer and/or a Director of the Company as
indicated below;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Serge
Fecteau, D. McAusland and R. Millington and each of them, as attorneys for the
undersigned and in the undersigned's name, place and stead, and in each of the
undersigned's offices and capacities as an Officer and/or a Director of the
Company, to execute and file such Annual Report on Form 10-K, hereby giving and
granting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and perform all and
every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about
the premises as fully, to all intents and purposes, as the undersigned might or
could do if personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be
done, by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of
March 2001.

                                 /s/  R. Genest
                              ---------------------
                              Name:   R. Genest
                              Title:  Corporate Controller
# Official Journal C 316A/11 D

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 316A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5111 December 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 316A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5111 December 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 316A/01 | Call for expression of interest for the appointment of an alternate Chairman of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency — COM/2008/10147 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2008/C 316A/01

Call for expression of interest for the appointment of an alternate Chairman of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency — COM/2008/10147

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

(2004/C 78 E/0276)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3381/03

by David Martin (PSE) to the Commission

(14 November 2003)

Subject:   Transportation of horses from Romania to Italy

Would the Commission explain why in the light of its own findings of violations of the law and great cruelty to the animals involved in the transportation of horses from Romania to Italy it does not suspend this trade until certain legal requirements are met?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(22 December 2003)

The Commission shares the concerns expressed by the Honourable Member regarding the findings of the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) missions carried out in Romania in November 2002 and June 2003 (1) on the operation of controls on the export of live horses to the Union.

In the light of these findings, the Commission took urgent contact with the Romanian authorities to agree the corrective actions required to remedy the deficiencies identified. On two occasions in 2003, the Deputy Director- General for Health and Consumer Protection met a representative of the Mission of Romania to the Union. At each meeting, the question of Romanian horses exported to the Union was raised.

It should be noted that the Commission has presently no legal basis to intervene in the welfare conditions in which horses are kept and transported in Romania. However, the Commission is committed to take all possible actions in this regard to remedy the most critical situations reported.

Concerning the veterinary certification of horses exported to the Union, a mission to Romania took place from 6 to 10 October 2003. The preliminary findings of this mission indicate that progress is under way as regards the identification of horses infected by Equine Infectious Anaemia and that the Romanian authorities are continuing to make real efforts to correct the deficiencies identified.

The number of FVO missions to Romania performed in relation to animal health issues indicates the degree to which the Commission is committed to rapidly improve the current situation.

The Commission will continue to collaborate closely with the Romanian authorities to ensure that any remaining deficiencies are addressed and that measures are taken to avoid a recurrence of such problems. The need for further action, such as evoked by the Honourable Member, will be considered in the light of progress achieved by the Romanian authorities.

----

(1)  Inspection reports are registered under DG (SANCO)/8675/2002 and DG(SANCO)9226/2003.

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Munawar Hidayatallah, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,    certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc.:     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation;     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      BY: /s/  MUNAWAR    H. HIDAYATALLAH    MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     DATE: March 22, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 133 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 133

  Providing for the reappointment of Barbara M. Barrett as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2018

   Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. Cole, and Ms. Matsui) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for the reappointment of Barbara M. Barrett as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Barbara M. Barrett of Arizona 
on January 10, 2019, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent. 
The appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on January 11, 
2019, or the date of the enactment of this joint resolution, whichever 
occurs later.
                                 <all>
```