alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           Certification Pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                            As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alderwoods Group, Inc. (the "Company") for
the twelve weeks ended March 22, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officer's
knowledge:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
           Report.


Dated: May 1, 2003


                                                ------------------------------
                                                Name:  Paul A. Houston
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer



                                                ------------------------------
                                                Name:  Kenneth A. Sloan
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alderwoods Group, Inc. and will be retained by Alderwoods Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission 

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on April 30, 2010 

 DOCKET 

NUMBER 

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME 

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING 

NOTICE 

DATE 

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

1 94-1374 Dayton Tire, 

Bridgestone/Firestone 03/27/97 DFR 08/01/97 Closed 

2 94-3393 Southern Scrap Materials Co., 

Inc. 11/24/97 DFR 01/30/98 Closed 

3 98-0755 Avcon, Inc., Vasilios N. Saites 

and Nicholas Saites 09/28/00 DFR 11/29/00 Closed 

4 98-1168 Avcon, Inc., Vasilios N. Saites 

and Nicholas Saites 09/28/00 DFR 11/29/00 Closed 

5 00-1402 Sharon and Walter 

Construction, Inc. 09/05/01 DFR 10/18/01 Closed 

6 99-0958 

Vasilios N. Saites, individually, 

and d/b/a Altor, Inc. and/or 

Avcon, Inc.; and Nicholas 

Saites, individually, and d/b/a 

Altor, Inc., and/or Avcon, Inc. 

02/01/02 DFR 05/01/02 Closed 

7 02-1164 Loretto-Oswego Residential 

Health Care Facility (RHCF) 01/27/04 DFR 02/23/05 Closed 

8 02-1174 Loretto-Oswego Regional 

Health Care Facility (RHCF) 01/27/04 DFR 02/23/05 Closed 

9 05-0839 Summit Contractors, Inc. 06/29/06 DFR 05/24/07 Closed 

10 06-1990 AKM LLC d/b/a Volks 

Constructors 07/27/07 DFR 10/18/07 Closed 

11 06-1036 Compass Environmental, Inc. 03/03/08 DFR 03/14/08 Closed 

12 07-0645 Erickson Air-Crane, 

Incorporated 03/18/08 DFR 04/11/08 Closed 

13 07-1796 Pullman Power, LLC and its 

successors 

09/24/08 DFR 

14 07-1045 ConocoPhillips Bayway 

Refinery 11/25/08 DFR 12/18/08 Closed 

15 07-1578 Elliot Construction Corp. 07/24/09 DFR 08/05/09 Closed 

16 06-1542 Thomas Industrial Coatings, 

Inc. 09/23/09 DFR 10/07/09 Closed 

17 07-1350 MVM Contracting Corp. 09/23/09 DFR 10/01/09 Closed 

18 08-0088 

Acme Energy Services d/b/a 

Big Dog Drilling, and its 

successors 

12/04/09 DFR 01/26/10 Closed 

19 05-0055 L&L Painting Company, Inc. 12/22/09 DFR 02/02/10 Open 

20 08-1292 Wal-Mart Distribution Center 

#6016 01/12/10 DFR 01/25/10 Open 

21 07-1851 Associated Underwater 

Services 01/13/10 DFR 01/29/10 Closed 

22 08-1225 K.E.R. Enterprises, Inc. dba 

Armadillo Underground 01/13/10 DFR 01/25/10 Open 

23 09-1284 Shaw Areva Mox Services, LLC 01/20/10 DFR 01/29/10 Open 
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission 

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on April 30, 2010 

 DOCKET 

NUMBER 

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME 

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING 

NOTICE 

DATE 

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

24 08-1037 Nuprecon, LP 02/13/10 DFR 03/29/10 Open 

25 08-0866 Southern Pan Services Co. 04/15/10 DFR 

26 09-0240 Deep South Crane and Rigging 

Co. 04/22/10 DFR 

27 08-1547 United States Postal Service 04/29/10 DFR 

* DFR – Direction for Review 

 REM – Appellate Remand 

 INT REV - Interlocutory Review
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On November 15, 2024, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed first material modification to the Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States and State of Washington*
                     v. 
                    *City of Seattle,*
                     Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00678-JCC. The proposed modification revises provisions in a Consent Decree between the parties that was entered by the Court on July 3, 2013. The proposed modification would revise certain sewer control measures, design criteria, deadlines, and adaptive management procedures in the Consent Decree to address changed circumstances since the Decree was first entered, and would update and clarify a number of related provisions. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the modification. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural 
                    ( print page 92162)
                    Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States and State of Washington*
                     v. 
                    *City of Seattle,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-10066. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: *To submit comments:*
*Send them to:*By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 Any comments submitted in writing may be filed by the United States in whole or in part on the public court docket without notice to the commenter. During the public comment period, the modification may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: 
                    *https://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*
                     If you require assistance accessing the modification, you may request assistance by email or by mail to the addresses provided above for submitting comments. Kathryn C. Macdonald, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2024-27172 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10348

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Eli Lujano Medina, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:21-CR-251-2

______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Eli Lujano Medina has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Medina has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 5, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10348 Document: 00517022992 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/05/2024
No. 23-10348

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10348 Document: 00517022992 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/05/2024
Exhibit 24.5**POWER OF ATTORNEY**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS     WHEREAS, ALCAN INC., a Canadian corporation (the “Company”), proposes shortly to file with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934 as amended(the “Act”), the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act.     WHEREAS, the undersigned is an Officer and/or a Director of the Company as indicated below;     NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints R. Millington, D. McAuslandand P. Chenard and each of them, as attorneys for the undersigned and in the undersigned’s name,place and stead, and in each of the undersigned’s offices and capacities as an Officer and/or aDirector of the Company, to execute and file such Annual Report on Form 10-K, hereby giving andgranting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thingwhatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully, to all intentsand purposes, as the undersigned might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof,hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to bedone, by virtue hereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of February 2007.         Signed: /s/ Yves Mansion   Name:  Yves Mansion   Title:  Director
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 57 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 57

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
    Education relating to accountability and State plans under the 
            Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2017

Mr. Rokita submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
            to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
    Education relating to accountability and State plans under the 
            Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to 
accountability and State plans under the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 86076 (November 29, 
2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H199]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  Rev. Dr. Silvester S. Beaman, Bethel African Methodist Episcopal 
Church, Wilmington, Delaware, offered the following prayer:
  Almighty God, the focus of our adoration, the hope of our salvation 
and the source of our strength.
  In this immense Hall for which the reverberating echoes of great men 
and women have raised their voices for the cause of justice, liberty 
and equality, we pause to surrender to Your sovereign authority.
  We invoke Your presence. We petition You for wisdom. We await Your 
effectual power.
  A Nation and world look to this deliberative body to be a voice for 
the voiceless, help for the hurting, and inspiration for the weary. 
Give us courage for our times. In the season of celebration, help us to 
see the transformative light of faith that inspired Mahatma Gandhi, 
Malcolm X, and Martin Luther King, that transcends the things that 
divide and help us to hold fast to those universal principles that 
unite.
  God, may our motives, words, actions, and love define us in these, 
our defining moments, by Your grace and according to Your will.
  Amen.

                          ____________________
```
#### Bank of Baraboo, Respondent, vs. Laird, Appellant.

*May 16*

June *4, 1912.*

*Bills and notes: Owner in due course: Notice to maker.*

The rights of a hank as owner in due course of a note purchased hy it are not prejudiced hy the sending of a notice to the maker stating that the note is at the hank “for collection.”

Appear from a judgment of tbe circuit' court for Sauk county: E. Bay SteveNS, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*V. H. Cady,*for tbe appellant.

Eor tbe respondent' there was a brief by *Qrotophorst, Evans <&*Thomas, and oral argument by *E. A. Evans.*

WiNsnow, C. J.

Tbe action is upon a negotiable promissory note executed by tbe defendant to a corporation called the Great Lakes Portland Cement 'Company, which note was afterwards purchased by tbe plaintiff. Tbe defense was that the execution of tbe note was induced by fraud, and that tbe plaintiff did not become tbe owner thereof in due course.

Upon tbe trial it appeared that tbe note was a three-months note executed and dated October Í0, 1910, and tbe plaintiff’s cashier testified that tbe same was purchased by tbe bank from tbe agent' of tbe promisee in tbe regular course of business on tbe 18th of October for tbe face thereof, less a discount of seven per cent, for tbe time it bad to run. There was nothing in tbe case tending to contradict' or throw any serious doubt on this testimony unless it be tbe fact that when tbe note fell due tbe bank sent a notice to tbe maker stating that tbe note in question was at tbe bank “for collection,” instead-of stating that tbe bank owned tbe note. Testimony by tbe defendant to tbe effect that tbe assistant cashier of tbe bank made an oral request of tbe defendant to pay tbe note, in tbe course of which be stated that tbe same was at tbe bank “for collection,” was ruled out, and a verdict for the plaintiff for tbe full amount of tbe note, principal and interest, was directed. Certain testimony tending to prove certain of the *244alleged fraudulent representations was received, but the court held that the testimony showed without dispute that the plaintiff was the owner in due course for value, and on this ground directed the verdict.

The ruling of the trial court was manifestly right. The note was bought over the counter of the bank in regular business hours at the ordinary rate of discount, and there was nothing in its appearance to indicate that it was anything more or less than an ordinary negotiable note given by a business man in the ordinary course of his business. The fact that the bank notified the maker that the note was at the bank “for collection” cuts no figure. We suppose that such notices are sent out by all banks whether they own the particular note in question or not. They are not inconsistent with ownership by the bank. There might perhaps be special circumstances surrounding a given case where such a notice or statement might acquire the significance of an admission that the bank was not the owner, but there are no such facts here.

*By tKe Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1117 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1117

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                                 An Act

 
To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
   to submit a report regarding certain plans regarding assistance to 
applicants and grantees during the response to an emergency or disaster.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ACTION PLAN TO IMPROVE FIELD TRANSITION.
    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency (FEMA) shall report to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate regarding the 
plans the agency will undertake to provide the following:
        (1) Consistent guidance to applicants on FEMA disaster funding 
    procedures during the response to an emergency or disaster.
        (2) Appropriate record maintenance and transfer of documents to 
    new teams during staff transitions.
        (3) Accurate assistance to applicants and grantees to ease the 
    administrative burden throughout the process of obtaining and 
    monitoring assistance.
    (b) Maintaining Records.--The report shall also include a plan for 
implementing operating procedures and document retention requirements 
to ensure the maintenance of appropriate records throughout the 
lifecycle of the emergency or disaster.
    (c) New Technologies.--Finally, the report shall identify new 
technologies that further aid the disaster workforce in partnering with 
State, local, and tribal governments and private nonprofits in the wake 
of a disaster or emergency to educate, assist, and inform applicants on 
the status of their emergency or disaster assistance applications and 
projects.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# Official Journal C 20A/20 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 20A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6620 January 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 20A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6620 January 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2023/C 20 A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/282/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union – Directorate for Legislative and Committee Coordination | 1 |
| 2023/C 20 A/02 | Recruitment notice PE/283/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Communication – Directorate for Campaigns | 8 |
| 2023/C 20 A/03 | Recruitment notice PE/284/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Parliamentary Democracy Partnerships – Directorate for External Liaison Offices | 14 |
| 2023/C 20 A/04 | Recruitment notice PE/285/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Parliamentary Democracy Partnerships – Directorate for Resources | 20 |
| 2023/C 20 A/05 | Recruitment notice PE/286/S – Director-General (Function group AD, grade 15) – Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support | 24 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2023/C 20 A/01

Recruitment notice PE/282/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union – Directorate for Legislative and Committee Coordination

1

2023/C 20 A/02

Recruitment notice PE/283/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Communication – Directorate for Campaigns

8

2023/C 20 A/03

Recruitment notice PE/284/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Parliamentary Democracy Partnerships – Directorate for External Liaison Offices

14

2023/C 20 A/04

Recruitment notice PE/285/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Parliamentary Democracy Partnerships – Directorate for Resources

20

2023/C 20 A/05

Recruitment notice PE/286/S – Director-General (Function group AD, grade 15) – Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support

24

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1005 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1005

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of 
              adult day health care services for veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2017

   Mr. Zeldin (for himself and Miss Rice of New York) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of 
              adult day health care services for veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROVISION OF ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE SERVICES FOR VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1745 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d)(1) The Secretary shall enter into an agreement under section 
1720(c)(1) of this title or a contract with each State home for payment 
by the Secretary for adult day health care provided to a veteran who is 
eligible for, but does not receive, nursing home care pursuant to 
subsection (a).
    ``(2) Payment under each agreement or contract between the 
Secretary and a State home under paragraph (1) for each veteran who 
receives care under such paragraph shall be made at a rate that is 
equal to 65 percent of the payment that the Secretary would pay to the 
State home pursuant to subsection (a)(2) if the veteran received 
nursing home care under subsection (a) rather than under paragraph (1) 
of this subsection.
    ``(3) Payment by the Secretary under paragraph (1) to a State home 
for adult day health care provided to a veteran described in that 
paragraph constitutes payment in full to the State home for such care 
furnished to that veteran.''; and
            (2) in the heading, by inserting ``, adult day health 
        care,'' after ``home care''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 17 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to 
section 1745 and inserting the following new item:

``1745. Nursing home care, adult day health care, and medications for 
                            veterans with service-connected 
                            disabilities.''.
                                 <all>
```