alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S239]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Byrd).
  The legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                  Washington, DC, January 9, 2009.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the 
     Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable 
     Sheldon Whitehouse, a Senator from the State of Rhode Island, 
     to perform the duties of the Chair.
                                                   Robert C. Byrd,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. WHITEHOUSE thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer ofAlcan Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, thatthe Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 31 December 2005(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: 8 March 2006                                                          /s/ Michael Hanley                          

                                                                                        Michael Hanley

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Annual Report onForm 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, November 20, 2024-10 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Meeting will take place remotely and in person at 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland, Room 420.

# STATUS: 

Commission Meeting—Closed to the Public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Meeting Matter

Briefing Matter.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Alberta E. Mills, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (Cell).

Dated: November 13, 2024.

Alberta Mills,

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-26892 Filed 11-14-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         506,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    122,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               857,971
<PP&E>                                      14,121,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,350,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,887,716
<BONDS>                                     10,086,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,333
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,372,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,350,971
<SALES>                                      1,833,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,833,033
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,020,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             305,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (534,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (534,350)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 705 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-382, K2025-380.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27189 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### State ex rel. Fox Valley Canning Company, Respondent, vs. Poole, Village Clerk, Appellant.

*May 2*

June *4, 1929.*

*176For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *Albert H. Krugmeier*and *Joseph Witmer,*both of Appleton.

For the respondent there was a brief by *David C.*Pinker*ton*of Oshkosh, attorney, and *Bradford & Bradford*of Appleton, associate counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Pinkerton*and by *Mr. Roman Heilman*of Madison.

Rosenberry, C. J.

Error is assigned because it is claimed the court by the judgment reversed the entire action by the board of review. This contention seems to be based upon a *177misconception of the holding of the trial court. The only-matter treated in the judgment is the assessment relating to improvements upon the land. After setting forth the facts and the evidence in relation thereto, the court determined and adjudged “that the said action of the said board of review be and is hereby reversed and annulled.” This can refer to nothing but the action of the board increasing the assessment on the improvements as indicated.

It is further urged that the court was in error in holding that there was no evidence to sustain the finding made by the board of review. We have carefully searched the record and it is considered that the trial court must be sustained. There is considerable evidence as to how the assessor arrived at his valuation. There is some evidence as to the cost of machinery and buildings, but none whatever as to the fair market value of the improvements. One has only to look around at property owned by brewing companies, tanneries, and beet-sugar factories to realize that cost bears very little if any relation to present market value. The statute requires the real estate to be valued at the full value which could ordinarily be obtained therefor at private sale, which ordinarily is its fair market value. It is considered that the trial court correctly determined this question.

It is also urged that this action is futile and that the proper remedy of the relator was to pay the tax and bring an action to recover it. It is considered that this contention is not well founded. The board of review took final action August 1, 1928, the writ of *certiorari*was issued August 13th, - the judgment of the circuit court was rendered October 19, 1928; the assessment roll remains in the hands of the clerk until the third Monday in December as provided by sec. 70.68, Stats. *State ex rel. Heller v. Lawler,*103 Wis, 460, 79 N. W. 777.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 104 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2018 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1892. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1892, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following corrections: 

5 (1) Insert before section 1 the following: 

6 ‘‘DIVISION A—HONORING 

7 HOMETOWN HEROES ACT’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 104 RDS 

1 (2) In section 1, strike ‘‘Act’’ and insert ‘‘divi2 sion’’. 

3 (3) In section 2, after ‘‘a ‘public safety officer’ 

4 as defined in section 1204 of title I of the Omnibus 

5 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 

6 U.S.C. 10284)’’, insert the following: ‘‘.’’. 

7 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply with respect to deaths of first re9 sponders occurring on or after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act.’’. 

11 (4) At the end of division G, strike the fol12 lowing: ‘‘.’’. 

13 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this Act shall apply with respect to deaths of first respond15 ers occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this 

16 Act.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **GROVER**

**SELLERS Al-rORNEI** 

**GCNERN.**mnomblo f . P. MoDonola, mm P.

Lo~lslrtum eaut neoeasuily **hem uswl**  Chc ldentloal nmber

in orbe: to ag;:roprltta that p~rtloul~r 

### dm0ien0 p l ppropria- 2103 

### 01:

t ba Governur*8i. 5y 

### u t alni~ th0 O IOY nuder, 

### t he

X & &e**lbture** ;rrbcenta

6 oontlnulty 

### or progreeslreapproprlbtire aotlon whla:i

lu uneristakable

1x1 its latent. .tpproprlstlon aUz+*rfi

ua e orration of t&r Coaptroll*r*sofrio* pnd nn uhqU 8olely ror ltm oonmnlonoe In the ria0d reoord kwpis+g 

## 0r rwdr. The **wmber -T-97**  **” vme**  **80 use4**  to Indicate Item Lll of the si;solal

Pure bred Cotton Seed Izmpeotion wnd during **the** tiaoalyearl9U. It warn ohangod by the Conptrollu to -U-ls3w during **tne** rlmoalyoar **1F45, but**  et111 it lnaleetod the Uantlml rd. In the flwal year 1966, lt will **bs** ohangod again **by** tie Comptsiallar and **lndlamte** the ram6 fund. Tto Caaptroller haa ngwisd the aicresuntlcned np::mprlstlon 08 ohuaed to the Epsiel Fur@ Bre4 Cottcm tier4 Inapootlon 

## ma and haa lasued w-t* pumwnt thereto.

Thr,oaptlssof the Uixglsl~tur+*s a&ra&itlon blll uhlon rwda "kc ;ot tmklng 8gproprlatlcm to pay 

## dericlsncy ogproprlatioas

&rented by tiit Oavaraa~ .prlor to January 1, 19b5.

. . .‘

. la 8ufilaiwitunder Art. 3. Sea. 35 or the Statb Cfmatltutlon tc sita rearorable notioe of the subjest matter 

## or the Btatuto. IO 84ditii0~, SW. 2 or the uqi8ieun*8 

### l pproprlatloa

### iet

l lnrlp cltatea that ~Oofiahsop 

### 6r rat s **MChOrhti e@!dn&t**  **speOia1 .PuadS**  **6htil b0**  **F&b :G+Ut**  **Of the**  bd.nnam or’ said Speoirl ?umIs now In tbs State Tre~8ury.”

a T~U Or th@ rar8@htg it 16 she OplaiOs Or thb off100 that tte dsrloleaoy .ppropriatluagcastul by th8

‘ ;QTerncmla 1964, l ttI qgmoprlat4 **by Aots**  1545. **49th LeqLa**  18ture. ii.

Is., p. 293, oh. 2ll, **tio8th-l be**  **OhM#5d 0**  the swoiol Pura Bred c&ton Seed Isupeotlon Rand. : vsrytwy your6
0FFlcE 0F THE ATTORNEY GENE~~AL OFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

April 6, lOa 
I 

"'rr ISFURTHERORDERlL'D,ADJVDCEDA?JD 

DECREED by the wurt that upon ths payment 

0r the mm 0r lumen an6 (W.te) as/m 

gollu8 by the DUendant to the Plaintifi 

a16 the County or Montgbmery, the tax. 

sent heroin 8h811 be demlared utlrrle r 

dgon6 pal6 in full, 8n6 th8t the tax lien upon 

the above duoribed property to 880~~0 thr 

pCIyi88nt Or raid #WI, 8h811 be l tin( F tir h.6 

an6 ~atlmrlrb Wfkll for l aoh an6 l rw~ roar, 

a8 set out la Plalntirr** orlglnal Petition, 

. an6 that the Plaintift hare ltm l xwutloa 

aa6 ardor or #alo.* 

It dll bo note6 in the tlrmt par8graph,hordnabwo uoteb that the noovary la for an mount or ~levoa 

@16 EE v 100 ($11&a) Dollar8 plutr 8h (6%) pu oont pot 

anmm from 6ato pot11 paid. The aown paragraph above 

quoted rorider that th8 pamnt of thk 8um or norm an6 

~~/lOO ytll.2fS) Dollar8 rhall ratirrr mob Jtl6@mnt u&l 

mabsr no reremenoe to the payment or lntorrrt. Thor. 

two paragraphr, therofora, are appebently repugrunt. 

tlon a ji6tgwnt dll be road a# a whole. Sea 10 TO% 

hu. tee, an6 Ikagnolla P8trolaum COmpSnJl v8* Caa~ll, 

a SW En6 897 (mm. or App. re-hearln 

are apparent repugnant olau888 in a (1 

68nlo6). If them 

udfpnt br r8a8oa 

or whloh the slenning lr.ob8oure the OlaU88 rwt appearlng will oontrol. PrixlO9 v#, ?l'O8t-&hn8On lumber OOmpany, 194 SW l61 (Writ of error refU8ed). 

Applying the abwo~m8ntloxwd ml.08 Or oon8tnaotion to the Judgment lnvolve6 in thl8 ln@rY it 18 the 

opinion or thla Department an6 you are 80 a6&6 that 

the 8ix (6%) per osnt int8rert provided ln the rmt 

paragraph herelnabovr Quoted will prevail an6 WV8m 

I 
Mr. A. IL Elokuaon, April 6,'19SS, Pa@ S 

thi8 ju6gment an6 that it 18 th8 6utr of the 6i8triot 

oluk fo w&e the oolleotion of the intrreat th8roin 

provided ror boror8 relw8er 04n bCproporly 1881106 

byhlm. 

Tr u8tlng tht thl8 8atl8raotorllf l nmmr8 yo ur 

inwv, lm a r . 

WtAW 

(8g6) GERALD C. &URN 

AlToRI9EyG~OFTEX4S
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000885 22-NOV-2016 08:50 AM
### SERVED: August 8, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF 

### MESAAIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil PenaltyAction) FDMS No. FAA-2013-0614


### NOTICE OFHEARING DATES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered on September23 and 24, 2013, inclusive, in Courtroom 406 [U.S. Tax Court], Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse, 401 WestWashington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties should vacate the courthouse on orbefore 5:00p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be removed from the docket untilthejudge receives the proper pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier orpostal service. 

# tit-«-,(**('.(~~** Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Christopher Pappaioanou, Vice President

and General Counsel MesaAir Group 410 N. 44th Street, Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ 85008 TEL: 602-685-4000 FAX: 602-685-4350 Robert C. Cohn, Respondent's Counsel Patrick R. Rizzi, Respondent's Counsel Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 TEL: 202-637-4999/5659 FAX: 202-637-5910 robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com ONE COPY

Theodore P. Byrne, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7112 FAX: 310-725-6816 FDMSNo. FAA-2013-0614 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-

### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) ·Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536



### -3-
----

(2004/C 84 E/0508)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0605/04

by Albert Maat (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(27 February 2004)

Subject:   Follow-up to question E-3005/02 on the European shipbuilding sector

In respect of the aid of approximately EUR 700 million granted by the Spanish government to the Spanish shipbuilding sector, can the Commission answer following questions:

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(1 April 2004)

----

(1)OJ C 201, 26.8.2003.

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40750

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEWELL KEITH FOLLMER,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1-94-CR-137-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 21, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dewell Keith Follmer appeals the sentence he received

following his conviction for being a felon in possession of

firearms. We have reviewed the record and Follmer's brief and

AFFIRM the district court's rulings, made during the sentencing

hearing, on: (1) whether Follmer's offense level properly was

increased because he obstructed justice; (2) whether Follmer

should have received a reduction for acceptance of responsiblity;
No. 95-40750

-2-

(3) the number of firearms possessed by Follmer; and (4) whether

Follmer used the firearm in relation to another felony. See

United States v. Follmer, No. 1:94-CR-137 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 7,

1995). 

 Regarding the following arguments raised by Follmer for the

first time on appeal, we find no error, plain or otherwise: 

(1) the calculation of Follmer's base offense level; (2) the

alleged denial of due process brought about by the district

court's refusal to reveal the location of the firearms; and 

(3) the applicability of the sporting/collecting reduction. See

United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993). 

 AFFIRMED.
State/Tribe1 Start Date FY 2021 Final 

Distribution

 FY 2022 Three 

Month Estimate 

Regional 

Recommendations2 

Final Fiscal Year 

2022 Final 

Distribution3

Kentucky 1-Sep 13,691,363 14,559,831 13,295,421

Alabama 1-Oct 1,400,399 1,764,632 1,359,901

Arkansas 1-Oct 124,677 98,162 98,162

Indiana 1-Oct 1,471,596 1,179,966 1,179,966

Mississippi 1-Oct 249,800 285,846 242,576

Pennsylvania 1-Oct 13,345,783 13,989,230 12,959,835

Hopi Tribe 1-Jun 376,841 353,996 353,996

Navajo Nation 1-Jun 1,519,135 1,670,000 1,475,203

Alaska 1-Jul 373,229 381,400 362,436

Colorado 1-Jul 2,334,725 2,401,342 2,267,207

Crow Tribe 1-Jul 576,007 599,221 559,349

Illinois 1-Jul 3,339,928 4,206,782 3,243,340

Iowa 1-Jul 46,557 47,079 45,211

Kansas 1-Jul 55,126 43,819 43,819

Montana 1-Jul 2,217,710 2,217,710 2,153,576

New Mexico 1-Jul 840,373 839,842 816,070

North Dakota 1-Jul 1,019,912 1,109,328 990,417

Ohio 1-Jul 1,496,399 1,680,760 1,453,124

Oklahoma4 1-Jan 1,319,217 - -

Utah 1-Jul 2,054,707 2,138,274 1,995,287

Wyoming 1-Jul 2,472,498 2,559,063 2,400,996

Louisiana 1-Jan 263,961 277,230 256,327

Maryland 1-Jan 924,586 866,118 866,118

Missouri 1-Jan 206,262 212,921 200,297

Virginia 1-Jan 3,600,000 3,700,000 3,495,891

West Virginia 1-Jan 10,503,010 10,709,573 10,199,272

Texas 1-Dec 2,766,199 3,152,958 2,686,203

Totals $68,590,000 $71,045,083 $65,000,000

1

This distribution does not include the distribution under the TN Program Development grant, which has a 

period of performance end date of 9/30/2023.

2

Each state and tribe that has a Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act P.L. 95-87, as amended, Title V 

Regulatory Program will forecast in advance its current annual program budget prior to the beginning of each 

Fiscal Year for which a grant will be requested. OSMRE then conducts a detailed analysis of the state and 

tribe estimates and provides a regional recommendation. No estimates were submitted for OK.

3

The Fiscal Year 2022 Regulatory Grant Final Distribution is $65,000,000, as authorized by the Consolidated 

Appropriations Act of 2022, PL 117-103.

Fiscal Year 2022 Regulatory Grant Distribution

4

This distribution does not include any development or other regulatory grants that may be made this fiscal 

year to entities authorized to regulate on Indian lands in Oklahoma consistent with McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 

S. Ct.. 2462 (2020), and related cases.