```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 91335-91337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26906]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-560-836]

Mattresses From Indonesia: Final Results and Partial Rescission 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that PT 
Ecos Jaya Indonesia and PT Grantec Jaya Indonesia (collectively, Ecos/
Grantec) and one non-individually examined company made sales of 
subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value 
(NV) during the period of review (POR), May 1, 2022, through April 30, 
2023. Additionally, Commerce determines that PT. Zinus Global Indonesia 
(Zinus Indonesia) did not make sales of mattresses from Indonesia at 
prices below NV during the POR. Moreover, we are rescinding this review 
with respect to one company that withdrew its request for review and 29 
companies that had no reviewable entries during the POR.

DATES: Applicable November 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith or Noah Wetzel, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 or (202) 
482-7466, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On June 3, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this 
administrative review and invited interested parties to comment.\1\ On 
July 23, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this administrative 
proceeding by seven days.\2\ On October 2, 2024, Commerce extended the 
deadline for the final results of this administrative review until 
November 12, 2024.\3\ For a summary of the events that occurred since 
the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\4\ 
Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Mattresses from Indonesia: Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023, 89 FR 47528 (June 
3, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 23, 2024.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
2022-2023 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated October 2, 
2024.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the 2022-2023 Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review: Mattresses from Indonesia,'' dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order 5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Mattresses from Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Serbia, 
Thailand, Republic of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 
Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping 
Determination for Cambodia, 86 FR 26460 (May 14, 2021) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise covered by this Order is mattresses from Indonesia. 
A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    We addressed all issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs 
filed in this administrative review in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is included in appendix I. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at https://access.trade/gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on an analysis of the comments received, we made one change 
to the margin calculation in the Preliminary Results for Ecos/
Grantec.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 91336]]

Partial Rescission

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if all parties who 
requested a review withdraw their requests within 90 days of the date 
that the notice of initiation of the requested review was published in 
the Federal Register. In the Preliminary Results, we intended to 
rescind this review with respect to PT Champion Mattress Indonesia 
Manufacturing (PTC) because PTC had timely withdrawn its request for 
review and no other interested party requested a review of this 
company. However, because we inadvertently did not rescind this review 
with respect to PTC in the Preliminary Results, we issued an intent-to-
rescind memorandum and provided interested parties with the opportunity 
to comment on this matter.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, in 
Part,'' dated June 4, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because PTC timely withdrew its request for review of itself and no 
other parties requested a review of PTC, Commerce is rescinding this 
administrative review with respect to PTC.
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there are no reviewable 
entries of subject merchandise during the POR subject to the 
antidumping duty order for which liquidation is suspended, Commerce may 
also rescind an administrative review, in whole or only with respect to 
a particular exporter or producer.\8\ At the end of the administrative 
review, any suspended entries are liquidated at the assessment rate 
computed for the review period.\9\ Therefore, for an administrative 
review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to 
be liquidated at the newly calculated assessment rate. On October 3, 
2024, Commerce informed interested parties that it intended to rescind 
this review with respect to 29 companies because those companies had no 
reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise and invited 
parties to comment.\10\ We received no comments on our preliminary 
rescission of the review with respect to these companies. Accordingly, 
in the absence of suspended entries of subject merchandise during the 
POR for these 29 companies for which this review was initiated, we are 
hereby rescinding this administrative review, in part, with respect to 
these companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See, e.g., Forged Steel Fittings from Taiwan: Rescission of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 85 FR 71317, 
71318 (November 9, 2020); see also Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy 
Steel Pipe from Mexico: Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 83 FR 54084 (October 26, 2018).
    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \10\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, in 
Part,'' dated October 3, 2024.
    \11\ See appendix II, where all companies for which we have 
rescinded this review are listed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Non-Examined Respondent

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a weighted-average dumping margin to be determined for 
companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits 
its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 
777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) 
of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others 
rate in an investigation, for guidance when determining the weighted-
average dumping margin for companies which were not selected for 
individual examination in an administrative review.
    Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is 
normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and 
producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis 
margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts 
available{time} .'' We calculated a dumping margin for Ecos/Grantec 
that is not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of 
facts available. Accordingly, we assigned a margin of 30.32 percent 
based on Ecos/Grantec's calculated weighted-average dumping margin to 
the non-selected respondent, PT Graha Seribusatujaya.

Final Results of Review

    We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins 
exist for the POR:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Exporter or producer                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia/PT Grantec Jaya Indonesia \12\.......       30.32
PT. Zinus Global Indonesia..................................        0.00
PT Graha Seribusatujaya.....................................       30.32
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The final results of this review shall be the basis for the 
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by 
the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated 
duties, where applicable.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ We are treating these companies as a single entity for 
purposes of this review. For a complete discussion, see Memorandum, 
``Affiliation and Collapsing of PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia and PT 
Grantec Jaya Indonesia,'' dated December 8, 2022.
    \13\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final 
results of review to interested parties within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject 
merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review.
    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where the respondent Ecos/Grantec 
reported the entered value for their U.S. sales, we calculated 
importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio 
of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined 
sales to the total entered value of those sales. Where Ecos/Grantec did 
not report entered value, we calculated an importer-specific, per-unit 
assessment rate based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total quantity of 
those sales. For Zinus Indonesia, whose weighted-average dumping margin 
is zero, and for any importers whose importer-specific assessment rate 
is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice will apply to entries 
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Ecos/Grantec or Zinus 
Indonesia for which the reviewed companies did not know that the 
merchandise they sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 
company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such 
instances, we

[[Page 91337]]

will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others 
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in 
the transaction.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the company that was not selected for individual review, we 
assigned an assessment rate calculated as noted in the ``Rate for Non-
Examined Respondent'' section, above.
    For the companies for which this review is rescinded with these 
final results (see appendix II), we will instruct CBP to assess 
antidumping duties on any suspended entries at a rate equal to the cash 
deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, 
or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the POR, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rates for the reviewed 
companies will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this review; (2) for producers or 
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior completed 
segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the company-specific rate published in the most recently completed 
segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a 
prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established in the most recently completed segment for the 
producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
producers or exporters will continue to be 2.22 percent, the all-others 
rate established in the LTFV investigation in this proceeding.\16\ 
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double 
antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an APO 
of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary 
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation 
subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative 
review in accordance with sections 751(a) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 
CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: November 12, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Treatment of Disputed Expenses
    Comment 2: Application of the Transactions Disregarded Rule
VI. Recommendation

Appendix II

List of Companies for Which We Are Rescinding the Administrative Review

1. Bali Natural Latex
2. CV. Aumireta Anggun
3. CV. Lautan Rezeki
4. Duta Abadi Primantara, Pt
5. Ecos Jaya JL Pasir Awi
6. Mimpi
7. P.T. Barat Daya Gemilang
8. PT Celebes Putra Prima
9. PT Champion Mattress Indonesia Manufacturing
10. PT Demak Putra Mandiri
11. PT Graha Anom Jaya
12. PT Kline Total Logistics Indonesia
13. PT Rubberfoam Indonesia
14. PT Solo Murni Epte
15. PT. Ateja Multi Industri
16. PT. Ateja Tritunggal
17. PT. Aurora World Cianjur
18. PT. Cahaya Buana Furindotama
19. PT. CJ Logistics Indonesia
20. PT. Dinamika Indonusa Prima
21. PT. Dunlopillo Indonesia
22. PT. Dynasti Indomegah
23. PT. Massindo International
24. PT. Ocean Centra Furnindo
25. PT. Quantum Tosan Internasional
26. PT. Romance Bedding & Furniture
27. PT. Royal Abadi Sejahtera
28. PT. Transporindo Buana Kargotama
29. Sonder Canada Inc
30. Super Poly Industry PT

[FR Doc. 2024-26906 Filed 11-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```