alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

SCHAAD DETECTIVE AGENCY, INC.,

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 16-1628

BRIEFING NOTICE AND INVITATION TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS

The parties and interested amici are requested to brief the issues presented in the 

Secretary’s petition for discretionary review. Any amicus curiae shall file its brief within 

the time allowed the party whom the amicus supports. No reply brief of an amicus curiae

will be accepted. Additionally, any amicus curiae brief filed should identify the interest of 

the amicus and shall state the reasons why a brief of the amicus is desirable. See 

Commission Rule 24.

The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider either the 

merits or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to 

review. Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief 

is to be filed within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify 

the Commission in writing within the applicable time for filing briefs, and shall serve a 

copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of intent) of opposing 

parties shall commence on the date of service.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: January 7, 2019 /s/

John X. Cerveny

Executive Secretary

 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the lefthand margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. 

The Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, 

regulations, case law, law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the 

Commission and to the opposing party. Parties should be cautioned that these materials 

will be considered only if appropriate.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8509-8510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02986]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is soliciting 
public comments on the proposed information collection described below. 
The proposed information collection will be sent to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required by the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Comments on this information collection must be submitted on or 
before April 14, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to Mr. Joel Schwartz, Chief 
Guidelines Officer at jschwartz@neh.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NEH will submit the proposed information 
collection to OMB for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 35). This notice is soliciting 
comments from members of the public and affected agencies. NEH is 
particularly interested in comments which help the agency to: (1) 
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the 
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed 
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, including 
through the use of electronic submissions of responses.
    This Notice also lists the following information:
    Type of Review: New Collection.

[[Page 8510]]

    Agency: National Endowment for the Humanities.
    Title of Proposal: General Clearance Authority to Develop 
Evaluation Instruments for the National Endowment for the Humanities.
    OMB Number: N/A.
    Affected Public: NEH grantees.
    Total Respondents: 600.
    Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
    Total Responses: 600.
    Average Time per Response: 60 minutes.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 600 hours.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of the information 
collection request. These comments will also become a matter of public 
record.

    Dated: February 3, 2014.
Carole Watson,
Deputy Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2014-02986 Filed 2-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 181 (Tuesday, December 2, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1297]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 Committee Meetings
  No committee meetings were held.
```
1 The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-2850

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Jeffrey Terrell Thomas, also * Western District of Missouri. known as Donald J. Walker, also * known as Xavier Jackson, also * [UNPUBLISHED] known as Charles Leeper, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 29, 1995 Filed: January 4, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Terrell Thomas, an African-American, appeals the 120- month sentence imposed by the district court 1after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine base (crack), in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We affirm.
We reject Thomas's argument that 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) is ambiguous and irrational, and has a discriminatory impact on African-Americans. SeeUnited States v. Jackson , 67 F.3d 1359, 1367 (8th Cir. 1995). Thomas urges us to reconsider our decisions in United States v. Clary , 34 F.3d 709 (8th Cir. 1994), cert.-2- denied , 115 S. Ct. 1172 (1995), and United States v. Buckner , 894 F.2d 975 (8th Cir. 1990), but only the court en banc can overturn the decision of another panel of the court, United States v. Polanco , 53 F.3d 893, 896 (8th Cir. 1995), pet. for cert. filed , No. 95-5022 (U.S. June 29, 1995). We have consistently rejected the claim that any disparate impact occasioned by the distinction between the penalties for crack and powder cocaine violates the Equal Protection Clause, see, e.g. , United States v. Delaney , 52 F.3d 182, 189 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 209 (1995); and we recently refused to reconsider Clary , United States v. Thompson , 51 F.3d 122, 127 (8th Cir. 1995).
We also conclude Thomas's Eighth Amendment argument--that the "vastly disproportionate penalty" for crack "offends constitutional principles of proportionality"--is foreclosed by our decisions in Thompson , 51 F.3d at 127; United States v. Wesley , 990 F.2d 360, 367 (8th Cir. 1993); and United States v. Winfrey , 900 F.2d 1225, 1227 (8th Cir. 1990).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,407
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,499
<INVENTORY>                                      7,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,114
<PP&E>                                         101,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 636,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,890
<BONDS>                                        136,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           208
<OTHER-SE>                                     215,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   636,285
<SALES>                                         45,639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,317
<CGS>                                           14,067
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   810
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,349
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,629
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,720
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,720
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
        

</TABLE>
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for November 30, 2018

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 23

2. Cases Added to Docket 3

Black Tie Moving Services, LLC

No. 18-0052

Direction for Review on November 7, 2018

Mansfield Industrial, Inc.

No. 17-1214

Direction for Review on November 23, 2018

Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC

No. 17-0483

Direction for Review on November 28, 2018

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket -1

Black Tie Moving Services, LLC

No. 18-0052

Remand Order on November 15, 2018

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 25
Exhibit 10.2

 

Amendment No. 1 to the 2019 Share Incentive Plan

 

This Amendment No.1 (“Amendment No.1”) to the 2019 Share Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”) of 360 Finance, Inc. (the “Company”) is effective as of August 23, 2020.

 

1. Pursuant to the resolutions passed in meeting of the board of directors of the Company on August 23, 2020, effective on the date first set forth above, Section 3.1(a)  of the 2019 Plan is hereby amended by replacing the Section 3.1(a) entirely as follows:

 

“(a)         Subject to the provisions of Article 9 and Section 3.1(b), the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to all Awards (including Incentive Share Options) is 17,547,567 Shares, and an annual increase on the first day of each of the four consecutive fiscal years of the Company commencing with the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2021, by (i) an amount equal to 1.0% of the total number of the then issued and outstanding Shares or (ii) such fewer number of Shares as may be determined by the Board.”

 

2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except as amended hereby, each of the provisions of the 2019 Plan shall remain in full force and effect, and this Amendment shall not constitute a modification, acceptance or waiver of any other provision of the 2019 Plan except as specifically provided herein.

 

3. This Amendment shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the Cayman Islands.
# Official Journal C 317/7 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 317 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 617 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 317

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 617 September 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 317/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 317/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 10 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 317/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2018/C 317/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-03-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                             419
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,611
<ALLOWANCES>                                        25
<INVENTORY>                                     73,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,358
<PP&E>                                          48,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,720
<SALES>                                        150,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,936
<CGS>                                          107,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,761)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,168)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,593)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,593)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.30)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004106EN.01007102.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/71

---

Action brought on 20 February 2004 by Schunk GmbH and Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik GmbH against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-69/04)

(2004/C 106/143)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 20 February 2004 by Schunk GmbH, Thale (Germany), and Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik GmbH, Heuchelheim (Germany), represented by Rainer Bechtold and Simon Hirsbrunner, lawyers.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision of the Commission of 3 December 2003 (Case COMP/E-2/38.359 — carbon and graphite-based products for electrical and mechanical applications); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision of the Commission of 3 December 2003 (Case COMP/E-2/38.359 — carbon and graphite-based products for electrical and mechanical applications);

| — | in the alternative, reduce the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants by that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, reduce the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants by that decision;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In the contested decision the Commission imposed on the applicants a fine in the sum of EUR 30 870 000 for infringement of Article 81(1) EC and Article 53(1) EEA by taking part in a series of agreements and concerted practices on the market in carbon and graphite-based products for electrical and mechanical applications.

In support of their action, the applicants claim, first, that the Commission erred in law by assuming that the first applicant, Schunk GmbH, which is a finance holding company, is jointly and severally liable for the fine imposed on its subsidiary, the second applicant, Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik GmbH (‘SKT’). Further, they plead that the contested decision has an unlawful legal basis, since Article 15 of Regulation 17/62 (1) gives the Commission a margin of discretion in relation to the amount of fines and is therefore incompatible with the principle of legal certainty and with higher ranking Community law. In addition, the Commission discriminated against the applicants relative to other undertakings in fixing the amount of the imposed fines, incorrectly assessed the deterrent effect of the fines and the cooperation of the applicants, and failed to have regard to material circumstances.

1

---

(1)  EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles [81] and [82] of the Treaty (OJ, English Special Edition 1959—1962, p. 87).

1

---
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on March 31, 2010

DOCKET NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S NAME
DOCKETED
TYPE*
BRIEFING NOTICE
DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
1
94-1374
Dayton Tire,
Bridgestone/Firestone
03/27/97
DFR
08/01/97
Closed
2
94-3393
Southern Scrap Materials Co.,
Inc.
11/24/97
DFR
01/30/98
Closed
3
98-0755
Avcon, Inc., Vasilios N. Saites
and Nicholas Saites
09/28/00
DFR
11/29/00
Closed
4
98-1168
Avcon, Inc., Vasilios N. Saites
and Nicholas Saites
09/28/00
DFR
11/29/00
Closed
5
00-1402
Sharon and Walter
Construction, Inc.
09/05/01
DFR
10/18/01
Closed


6


99-0958
Vasilios N. Saites, individually, and d/b/a Altor, Inc. and/or Avcon, Inc.; and Nicholas Saites, individually, and d/b/a
Altor, Inc., and/or Avcon, Inc.


02/01/02


DFR


05/01/02


Closed
7
02-1164
Loretto-Oswego Residential
Health Care Facility (RHCF)
01/27/04
DFR
02/23/05
Closed
8
02-1174
Loretto-Oswego Regional
Health Care Facility (RHCF)
01/27/04
DFR
02/23/05
Closed
9
05-0839
Summit Contractors, Inc.
06/29/06
DFR
05/24/07
Closed
10
06-1990
AKM LLC d/b/a Volks
Constructors
07/27/07
DFR
10/18/07
Closed
11
06-1036
Compass Environmental, Inc.
03/03/08
DFR
03/14/08
Closed
12
07-0645
Erickson Air-Crane,
Incorporated
03/18/08
DFR
04/11/08
Closed
13
07-1796
Pullman Power, LLC and its
successors
09/24/08
DFR


14
07-1045
ConocoPhillips Bayway
Refinery
11/25/08
DFR
12/18/08
Closed
15
07-1578
Elliot Construction Corp.
07/24/09
DFR
08/05/09
Closed
16
06-1542
Thomas Industrial Coatings,
Inc.
09/23/09
DFR
10/07/09
Closed
17
07-1350
MVM Contracting Corp.
09/23/09
DFR
10/01/09
Closed

18

08-0088
Acme Energy Services d/b/a Big Dog Drilling, and its
successors

12/04/09

DFR

01/26/10

Open
19
05-0055
L&L Painting Company, Inc.
12/22/09
DFR
02/02/10
Open
20
08-1292
Wal-Mart Distribution Center
#6016
01/12/10
DFR
01/25/10
Open
21
07-1851
Associated Underwater
Services
01/13/10
DFR
01/29/10
Open
22
08-1225
K.E.R. Enterprises, Inc. dba
Armadillo Underground
01/13/10
DFR
01/25/10
Open
23
09-1284
Shaw Areva Mox Services, LLC
01/20/10
DFR
01/29/10
Open

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on March 31, 2010

DOCKET NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S NAME
DOCKETED
TYPE*
BRIEFING NOTICE
DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
24
08-1037
Nuprecon, LP
02/13/10
DFR
03/29/10
Open
25
09-1559
Burrows Paper Corp.
02/19/10
DFR


*	DFR – Direction for Review REM – Appellate Remand
INT REV - Interlocutory Review
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 57 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
    Education relating to accountability and State plans under the 
            Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

              

 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of 
Education relating to accountability and State plans under the 
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (published at 81 Fed. 
Reg. 86076 (November 29, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 7, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
    Education relating to accountability and State plans under the 
            Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.
```