alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Cynthia L. Attwood Sworn In As Review Commission Chairman

**Cynthia L. Attwood Sworn In As Review Commission Chairman**

Cynthia L. Attwood was designated Chairman of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission by President Barack Obama on January 13, 2016. She was first appointed to the Review Commission by President Obama and confirmed by the Senate in 2010 to fill a term that expired on April 27, 2013, and was reappointed by the President with Senate confirmation in August 2013 to fill a term that expires in April 2019. Chair Attwood served as Acting Chairman since April 28, 2015.

 

I am deeply honored that the President has designated me to serve as Chairman of the Review Commission. Congress enacted the Occupational Safety and Health Act “to assure as far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions . . . .” And it created the Commission, a small agency with a significant role under the Act, to fairly and expeditiously adjudicate contests involving the Department of Labor, employers cited for violations of the Act, and employees and/or their representatives. We take our responsibility seriously. I am proud to say that the people who work here are wholly dedicated to our mission, and I am pleased to be given the opportunity to encourage our talented staff in their continuing efforts.

Prior to joining the Commission, Ms. Attwood served as Associate Solicitor of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health and as Associate Solicitor of Labor for Mine Safety and Health. She spent her early years of federal service in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, where she litigated cases before the Supreme Court and the United States Courts of Appeals. 

A native of Oak Park, Illinois, Ms. Attwood holds a B.A. degree from Oakland University and a J.D. degree from the University of Minnesota, where she served on the Law Review and was awarded membership in the Order of the Coif.
# Listing of New Cases Received

 

Last Updated: January 05, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Michael Dodson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                             
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: August 9, 2012/s/ J. MICHAELDODSONJ. Michael DodsonChief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary
Argued and submitted May 28,

affirmed June 23, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*AURELIO ROMERO, III, *Appellant.*

(C91-1676CR; CA A73862)

854 P2d 1001

Louis R. Miles, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

*257ROSSMAN, P. J.

*258ROSSMAN, P. J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for perjury, ORS 162.065(1), assigning error to the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. He argues that there was insufficient evidence to prove that his false statements were made with regard to a material issue. We affirm.

Defendant falsely stated his name and birth date on an affidavit of indigency and request for counsel form, which he swore was true and correct to the best of his knowledge. ORS 162.065(1) provides:

> “A person commits the crime of perjury if the person makes a false sworn statement in regard to a material issue, knowing it to be false.”

ORS 162.055(2) defines “material,” for purposes of perjury, as

> “that which could have affected the course or outcome of any proceeding or transaction. Whether a false statement is ‘material’ in a given factual situation is a question of law.”

Defendant concedes that he knowingly made a false sworn statement, but argues that the trial court nevertheless should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal. He argues that there was insufficient evidence that his false statements were material, because the court did not find that there would have been a different outcome, *i.e.,*that an attorney would not have been appointed, if he had furnished the correct information.

Defendant misunderstands the law. ORS 162.055(2) does not require that the false statements actually affect a proceeding or transaction in order for the statements to be material; it is enough that the statements *could*have affected its course or outcome. A state “verification specialist,” who verifies affidavits of indigency, testified that it is extremely important that a defendant provide the correct name and date of birth on an affidavit of indigency, because false information could prevent accurate verification of a defendant’s actual status and eligibility for appointed counsel. There was sufficient evidence that defendant’s false statements could have affected the determination of his eligibility for appointed counsel, and were, therefore, material. The trial court did not *259err in refusing to grant defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. Defendant’s other arguments are without merit.

Affirmed.
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

 Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant, 

v. OSHRC Docket No. 08-1037 

NUPRECON, LP, 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE 

The Commission requests that the parties brief the following issues: 

(1) Did the judge err in finding that 29 C.F.R. § 1926.501(b)(1) applied to 

Respondent’s Bobcat operator while he was on his equipment on the third 

floor in the area adjacent to the unprotected edge? In briefing this issue 

the parties are asked to discuss the definition of “walking/working 

surface” set forth at 29 C.F.R. § 1926.500(b) and OSHA Standard 

Interpretation Letter #20070417-7634, Fall Protection Requirements for 

Employees on Construction Equipment (Mar. 16, 2009). The parties are 

also asked to discuss whether the cited standard’s specific abatement 

measures would have protected the Bobcat operator from driving off the 

edge. 

(2) If the judge erred, did the Secretary prove that any of the Respondent’s 

employees, including the Bobcat operator, were otherwise exposed to the 

fall hazard? 

(3) Did the judge err in finding that the “Respondent failed to implement one 

of the three acceptable methods of fall protection” under the cited 

standard, particularly with respect to the installation and/or use of an 

alleged personal fall protection system? 

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 
2

 

 All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefore within the applicable time for filing 

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of 

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

 

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: 3/29/2010 /s/________________ 

 Ray H. Darling, Jr. 

 Executive Secretary 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Contact : Directory : J3 : Exercises Directorate  (J37)

# J37 Exercises Directorate

****

Directory Links

                            -  J0 Special Staff   
                            -  J1 Manpower and Personnel   
                            -  J2 Intelligence   
                            -  J3 Operations   
                            -  J4 Logistics   
                            -  J5 Strategic Planning & Policy   
                            -  J6 Communications Systems   
                            -  J7 Training and Exercises Directorate   
                            -  J8 Requirements and Resources Directorate   
                            -  Joint Interagency Task Force - West   

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector GeneralAccessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Flickr
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

      ( print page 92196)    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 450 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-359, K2025-357.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27154 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 23 (1)


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-77318) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Award and Incentive Plan of
American Biltrite Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84667)
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Award and Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as
of March 4, 1997 of American Biltrite Inc., and the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-84669) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors of American Biltrite Inc., of our report dated March 21, 2007, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of American
Biltrite Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2006.

                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,862<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          58,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         65,766<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,068)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,081
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,589
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,286
<INCOME-TAX>                                       843
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,443
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,628
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<FN>
<F1>Includes note receivable of $.63 million.
<F2>Net of bond discount of $1.497 million.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for June 2014



1.
Cases Pending Beginning of Month 
38




2.
Cases Added to Docket 

Meadows Construction Company, LLC
No. 12-2142
Direction for Review on 06/05/14

1

3.
Cases Subtracted From Docket


0
4.
Total Cases Pending End of Month
39
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
M. Parker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  March 15, 2003               By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Parker
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Jeffrey M. Parker
                                            Title:  Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and
will be retained by Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

Secretary of Labor, 

Complainant 

v. OSHRC Docket No. 10-1705 

Sea World of Florida, LLC, 

Respondent. 

Order Denying Petition to Intervene 

Mr. Flick's petition for leave to intervene tiled in this case is DENIED. Pursuant to 

Commission Rule 21, 29 C.F.R. § 2200.21, the petition fails to show that Mr. Flick's pru1icipation 

"will assist in the determination ofthe issues in question", Many matters discussed in Mr. Flick's 

petition are not before the court . 

.. SO ORDERED. --.:_ /" I ''V~ 

Date: November 5, 20 10 Judge Ken S. Welsch 

1924 Building, Suite 2R90 

100 Alabama Street. S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104 

Phone (404) 562-1640 Fax (404) 562-1650 

This order has been sent to: 

For the Secretary of Labor: 

John A. Black, Esquire 

Office ofthe Solicitor 

U.S. Depal1ment of Labor 

Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, Room 7T1 0 

Atlanta, GA 30303 

For the Employer: cc: 

Carla J. Gunnin Stone, Esquire Many Flick 

Constangy. Brooks & Smith, LLC 5 USC 552(b)(6) 

230 Peachtree Street. NW, Suite 

2400 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1557 

~\ v
#### Campbell’s Dollar Stores, Inc., Respondent, vs. Levitan, State Treasurer, Appellant.

*November 10, 1938*

February *7, 1939.*

*276For the appellant there were briefs by the *Attorney General, L. E. Vaudreuil,*deputy attorney general, and *Leonard C. Fons,*special counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Vaud-reuil.*

For the respondent there were briefs by *Kaumheimcr, Alt & Likert*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *Nichols, Wood, Marx & Giutcr*of Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, and oral argument by *Leon E. Kaumheimcr.*

The following opinion was filed December 6, 1938:

NklsoN, J.

This appeal and the appeal in *State v. Sinclair Refining Co., ante,*p. 265, 282 N. *W.*624, were argued at the same time. The question here is the same as that decided in the *Sinclair Case.*The decision in that case rules this.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, without costs, on' February 7, 1939.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/RULE 15d-14(a) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, John J. Millerick, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Analogic Corporation; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | /s/John J. Millerick         
|Date: November 28, 2007 |  |  |  | John J. Millerick            
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Certification

 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company'sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: 12 March 2004 |   | /s/ Geoffery E. Merszei      |   |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | Geoffery E. Merszei          |   |
|                |   | Executive Vice President and |   |
|                |   | Chief Financial Officer      |   |
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



February 28, 2006



/s/    JEFFREY D.
SERKESJeffrey D. Serkes Principal Financial Officer