OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 1 of 6

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 310

January 1995

Rod Richardson

Bureau of Mine Reclamation

Department of Natural Resources

402 W. Washington St.

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-27648

TOPIC: POSTMINING LAND USE CHANGE - SURFACE MINING

INQUIRY: Must all postmining land use changes be considered "significant alterations" 

which require the full blown permit review process? Can a postmining land use change 

for a surface mining operation which involves under 5% of the permitted area be 

considered a minor change? OSM's interpretive rule of October 1, 1980 (45 FR 64908) 

applies to underground mines. Is there any material that discusses this issue with 

regard to surface mines?

SEARCH RESULTS: Research was conducted using prior COALEX Reports, the 

COALEX Library and other materials available in LEXIS. The materials identified 

indicate that all alterations to the original permit require a permit revision; however, it is 

the regulatory authorities that determine which revisions are "significant", are subject to 

a full blown permit review, and which revisions are "nonsignificant", subject to a simpler 

review procedure. For some states, land use changes are always considered 

"significant, in that the changes are subject to full blown permit review procedures.

Copies of the October 1, 1980 interpretive rule, relevant COALEX Reports, federal 

regulatory and OSM directives listed below are attached.

BACKGROUND MATERIAL

45 FR 64908 (OCTOBER 1, 1980). Final interpretive rule.

"The Office of Surface Mining is providing an interpretation of 30 CFR 784.15 and 

817.133 to clarify OSM's position that an operator of a long duration underground 

coal mining operation may apply for approval of an alternative post-mining land use 

through the permit revision procedures of 30 CFR 788.12 [now 30 CFR 774.13] 

toward the end of the mine life rather than initial permit application."

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 165, "Permit revisions; incidental boundary 

revisions" (March, 1991).
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 2 of 6

This Report provides information on legislative history, regulatory history and state 

regulations of incidental boundary revisions (IBRs) from prior Reports; OSM Directives 

and Federal Register preambles discussing OSM rational for approving or disapproving 

state IBR requirements; administrative and state decisions indicating situations were 

IBRs or revised permits were required; and a survey of eleven IMCC member states 

providing information on state regulations and their implementation.

COALEX STATE COMPARISON REPORT - 228, "Incidental boundary revisions 

and insignificant permit revisions." (August, 1992).

Part of this Report included a survey of nine IMCC member states asking if land use 

changes were allowed via the insignificant permit revisions process and, if so, under 

what criteria they were allowed.

There was no uniformity among the states on this issue. Some allowed land use 

changes if they were "nonsignificant", as defined by state program guidelines, while 

other states always required public notice and other "full blown" review provisions for 

land use changes.

REGULATORY HISTORY

44 FR 14902 (MARCH 13, 1979). Permanent program final preamble -- final rules. 

Sec. 788.12 Permit revisions. [Now 774.13)]

A commenter suggested that a permit revision be required only for "substantial" 

changes that would constitute a significant departure from the methods of mining or 

reclamation contemplated by the original permit. OSM modified the language in the final 

rule to provide the regulatory authorities with "parameters in their regulations to 

determine what changes in the methods of operations or reclamation constitute a 

significant departure from those approved in the original permit and, therefore, 

necessitate a revision."

Another commenter's request for the inclusion of a definition for the term "significant 

alteration" was rejected. OSM stated that the language of the regulation closely tracked 

that of the Act which "requires that revision or modification of a permit required by the 

regulatory authority (based on written findings) be subject to notice and hearing 

requirements established by the State or Federal program."

48 FR 44344 at 44377 (SEPTEMBER 28, 1983). Final rule. (Renumbering of 

sections.) Sec. 774.13 Permit revisions.

"The final rule allows the permittee to apply for both significant and insignificant 

permit revisions, but also requires...that the regulatory authority set guidelines 

establishing the scale or extent of 'significant revisions'." Significant revisions must 

meet all the permit application requirements; nonsignificant revisions are subject 

only to review procedures.
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 3 of 6

OSM added: "The final rule changes the concept of the previous rule which 

required permit revisions only for 'significant departures' from the original permit. It 

was not the intent of the previous rule to allow the operator to violate the terms of 

the existing permit so long as the departure was not 'significant'."

51 FR 21574 (JUNE 13, 1986). Notice of availability of a petition to initiate 

rulemaking and request for comments. Guidelines for significant revisions. And 

52 FR 6827 (March 5, 1987). Notice of decision on rulemaking petition.

The OSM director granted the petition for the federal program for Tennessee which 

requested that the regulatory authority establish guidelines for determining when a 

proposed revision to a permit is considered "significant". The petition included a request

that any change in postmining land uses be considered significant.

The OSM guidelines drafted in 1985, proposed specific criteria for significant 

revisions. Generally the changes involved environmental issues, e.g., changes in land 

use from nonindustrial or noncommercial to industrial or commercial.

59 FR 27932 (MAY 27, 1994). Final rule. Land use information.

The revised regulations concerning premining and postmining land use information 

that must be submitted in a permit application is included here for background.

OTHER OSM MATERIAL

OSM DIRECTIVE, Subject No. REG-21, Transmittal No. 398, "Findings and 

Determinations for Revisions and Renewals of Federal Permits" (1987).

Minor permit revision. "In most cases, a minor permit revision does not alter the 

original environmental document findings."

OSM DIRECTIVE, Subject No. TSR-5, Transmittal No. 399, "Alternative Postmining 

Land Use Requirements for Real Property" (1987)

"Any changes to the postmining land use should be approved during the permitting 

process or as a revision to the permit."

ATTACHMENTS

1. 45 FR 64908 (OCTOBER 1, 1980). Final interpretive rule.

2. COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 165, "Permit revisions; incidental 

boundary revisions" (March, 1991).

A. OSM DIRECTIVE, Subject No REG-19, Transmittal No 387, "Incidental 

Boundary Revisions" (October 19, 1987).
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 4 of 6

B. OSM DIRECTIVE, Subject No REG-21, Transmittal No 398, "Findings and 

Determinations for Revisions and Renewals of Federal Permits" 

(November 10, 1987).

C. COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 34, "Incidental boundary revision" 

(1985).

A. S Rep No 402, 93rd Cong, 1st Sess 57 (1973). [Excerpt]

B. S Rep No 128, 95th Cong, 1st Sess 79-80 (1977). [Excerpt]

C. 48 FR 44376-78 (September 28, 1983). Sec. 774.13 Permit 

revisions. [Excerpt]

D. Kentucky Administrative Regulations, 405 KAR 8:010 Sec. 20 

Permit Revisions. [Excerpts]

E. Illinois Coal Mining Regulations. Parts 1711, 1786, 1787 and 1788. 

[Excerpts]

F. West Virginia Surface Mining Reclamation Regs. Sec. 7D, IBRs; 

West Virginia Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Act, Article 6, 

Sec. 20-6-19 Permit Revision. [Excerpts]

G. Annotated Code of Maryland, Sec. 7-505 (1979). Code of Maryland 

Regulations Sec. 08.13.09.08. [Excerpts]

H. Wyoming Environmental Quality Act, Sec. 35-11-402. Land Quality 

Div. of the Dept. of Environmental Quality Regs., Sec. 6 (1980). 

[Excerpts]

I. North Dakota Admin. Code, Sec. 69-05.2-11-02 Permit Revisions. 

[Excerpt]

J. Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act, Sec. 34-33-103. 

Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Regs., Sec. 2.08.4 

(1982).

D. COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 118, "Major/minor permit revisions" 

(1989).

A. SMCRA Sec. 511.

B. 30 CFR 774.13 Permit Revisions.

C. Indiana Regulations and Statutes

D. Tennessee Regulations and Statutes

E. West Virginia Regulations and Statutes

F. Montana Regulations and Statutes

G. Wyoming Regulations and Statutes

E. Illinois: 53 FR 43112 (October 25, 1988) [Excerpts]

F. Indiana: 51 FR 17478 (May 13, 1986) [Excerpts]

G. Iowa: 51 FR 17176 (May 9, 1986) [Excerpts]

H. Kentucky:

1. 55 FR 46054 (November 1, 1990)

2. 55 FR 24113 (June 14, 1990) [Excerpts]

3. 48 FR 21574 (May 13, 1983) [Excerpts]

4. 48 FR 22711 (May 20, 1983) [Excerpts]

I. Ohio: 52 FR 26959 (July 17, 1987) [Excerpts]

J. Tennessee: 53 FR 49104 (December 5, 1988)
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 5 of 6

K. West Virginia:

0. 55 FR 23703 (June 12, 1990) [Excerpts]

1. 55 FR 21304 (May 23, 1990) [Excerpts]

2. 54 FR 16136 (April 21, 1989) [Excerpts]

L. TURNER BROTHERS, INC. (TBI) v OSM, Docket No. TU 6-51-R (1987).

M. ROCKY COAL CO., INC. v OSM, Docket No. NX 7-90-R (1987).

N. MULLINS COAL CO., INC. v OSM, Docket Nos. NX 5-29-R, NX 5-41-R 

(August 23, 1985).

O. ISLAND CREEK COAL CO. v OSM), Docket Nos. NX 9-106-R, NX 0-35-P 

(1981).

P. KOCHER COAL CO. v COMMONWEALTH OF PENN., DEPT. OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES (DER), EHB Docket No. 82-073-W 

(1986).

Q. ROCKWOOD INSURANCE CO. (BLUE COAL CO.) AND ROCKWOOD 

INSURANCE CO. (NORTHWEST MINING CO.) v COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENN., DPET. OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES (DER), 1981 EHB 

424, Docket Nos. 78-168-S, 78-166-S (1981).

R. OOTEN v FAERBER, COMMISSIONER, W. VA. DEPT. OF ENERGY, 

AND MAGNET COAL, INC., 383 SE 2d 774 (W Va 1989).

3. COALEX STATE COMPARISON REPORT - 228, "Incidental boundary revisions 

and insignificant permit revisions." (August, 1992).

A. Alabama:

1. Memorandum from Randall C. Johnson, Director, Alabama Surface 

Mining Commission, "Revised Guidelines for Revisions" (1987).

2. Rules of Alabama Surface Mining Commission, Sec. 880-X-8M-.06 

(1982). Permit revisions.

B. Indiana:

1. 310 IAC 12-3-121 (1986). Permit revisions; revisions and renewals, 

etc.

2. 310 IAC 12-3-82 (1982). Postmining land use.

C. Kentucky:

1. . KRS Ann. Sec. 350.070 (Baldwin)(1991). Permit revisions.

2. 405 KAR 8:010, Sec. 20 (1991). Permit revisions.

D. Maryland: COMAR 08.13.09.08 (1980). Permit review and transfer of 

permit rights.

E. Ohio:

1. Ohio Admin. Code 1501:13-4-06 (1986). Permit applications, 

revisions and renewals, etc.

2. Ohio Admin. code 1501: 13-9-17 (1982). Postmining use of land.

F. Pennsylvania:

1. Current Policy Guidelines, "Insignificant Boundary Corrections for 

Surface Mining Activities", Sec. II:02:03:1 (1986).

2. PADER Coal Mining Regulations, Sec. 86.54 (1989). Public notice 

of permit revision.
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 6 of 6

G. Texas: Railroad Commission of Texas, Surface Coal Mining Regulations, 

Sec. 051.07.04.226 (1979). Permit revisions.

H. Virginia:

1. Memorandum from Danny R. Brown, Commissioner, Division of 

Mined Land Reclamation, "Incidental Boundary 

Revision/Insignificant Permit Revision" (1992).

2. Virginia Surface Mining Regulations, Sec. 480-03-19.774.13 

(1985). Permit revisions.

I. West Virginia:

1. West Virginia Surface Mining Regulations, Sec. 38-2-3 (1990). 

Incidental boundary revisions.

2. West Virginia Surface Mining Regulations, Sec. 38-2-7 (1986). 

Criteria for approving alternative postmining use of land.

3. West Virginia Surface Mining Regulations, Sec. 38-2-3 (1986). 

Permit revisions.

4. West Virginia Surface Mining Regulations, "Addendum to Permit or 

Significant Revision of a Permit".

J. OSM DIRECTIVE, Subject No. REG-19, Transmittal No. 397, "Incidental 

Boundary Revisions" (1987).

K. OSM DIRECTIVE, Subject No. REG-21, Transmittal No. 398, "Findings 

and Determinations for Revisions and Renewals of Federal Permits" 

(1987).

L. Copies of survey conducted by IMCC for COALEX REPORT - 165.

M. COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 165, "Permit revisions; incidental 

boundary revisions" (1991). [ONLY SURVEY RESPONSES INCLUDED -

SEE ABOVE]

4. 44 FR 14902 (MARCH 13, 1979). Permanent program final preamble -- final 

rules. Sec. 788.12 Permit revisions. [Now 774.13)]

5. 48 FR 44344 at 44377 (SEPTEMBER 28, 1983). Final rule. (Renumbering of 

sections.) Sec. 774.13 Permit revisions.

6. 51 FR 21574 (JUNE 13, 1986). Notice of availability of a petition to initiate 

rulemaking and request for comments. Guidelines for significant revisions.

7. 52 FR 6827 (MARCH 5, 1987). Notice of decision on rulemaking petition.

8. 59 FR 27932 (MAY 27, 1994). Final rule. Land use information.

9. OSM DIRECTIVE, Subject No. REG-21, Transmittal No. 398, "Findings and 

Determinations for Revisions and Renewals of Federal Permits" (1987).

10.OSM DIRECTIVE, Subject No. TSR-5, Transmittal No. 399, "Alternative 

Postmining Land Use Requirements for Real Property" (1987).