alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7373

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JIMMY PRUITT DAWKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (6:07-cr-01454-HMH-1; 6:15-cv-02411-HMH)

Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Pruitt Dawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, 

III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Pruitt Dawkins seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack,

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in 

the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Dawkins’ 

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district 

court’s disposition, Dawkins has forfeited appellate review of 

the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 21


                     ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant



                                                           State or
                                                            Other
                                                        Jurisdiction
                                                             of
         Subsidiary                                     Incorporation

Alberto-Culver (Australia) Pty. Ltd.                    Australia
Alberto-Culver Canada, Inc.                             Canada
Alberto-Culver Company (U.K.), Limited                  United Kingdom
Alberto-Culver International, Inc.                      Delaware
Alberto-Culver de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                  Mexico
Alberto-Culver (P.R.), Inc.                             Delaware
Alberto-Culver USA, Inc.                                Delaware
BDM Grange, Ltd.                                        New Zealand
Cederroth Holding B.V.                                  Holland
Cederroth International AB                              Sweden
CIFCO, Inc.                                             Delaware
Indola Cosmetics, B.V.                                  The Netherlands
Indola SpA                                              Italy
Sally Beauty Company, Inc.                              Delaware
St. Ives Laboratories, Inc.                             Delaware


Subsidiaries  of the company  omitted  from the above table,  considered  in the
aggregate, would not be considered significant.
                                                   - 297 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EMUEL C. HENLEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 12 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E56]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                  GAZA

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. BILL PASCRELL, JR.

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, January 9, 2009

  Mr. PASCRELL. Madam Speaker, nearly 9,000 rockets, missiles, and 
mortars have been fired into Israel since 2001, terrorizing the Israeli 
people. More than 6,000 of them have fallen since Israel withdrew 
entirely from the Gaza Strip and Hamas took over its leadership in 
2005. The range of these rockets continues to grow, putting more of 
Israel's population in danger.
  The humanitarian situation in Gaza also worsens by the day, and 
scores of civilians have been hurt or killed in the fighting. Hamas 
terrorists embed themselves in private homes, schools, mosques, 
hospitals, and use innocent Palestinians as human shields.
  I fully support Israel's right to defend itself against the constant 
barrage of attacks from Hamas. However, it is imperative that both the 
Hamas government in Gaza and the State of Israel stop this cycle of 
violence that has caused hundreds of casualties, before it gets worse. 
Israelis in Southern Israel and Palestinians in Gaza live in constant 
fear for their lives, and this is unacceptable.
  The Bush Administration must immediately take all necessary measures, 
in conjunction with the world community, to broker a peaceful and 
sustainable resolution to this volatile situation. Should the President 
heed this call, it will bolster the incoming Obama Administration's 
efforts as it advocates for a lasting peace.
  Military action will not result in an enduring resolution of these 
long simmering tensions. It is only through diplomacy and a 
strengthening of the Israeli Palestinian reconciliation process that a 
sustainable two state solution will be achieved. The violence must stop 
and the healing process begin, before more civilians are hurt and more 
lives are destroyed.

                          ____________________
```
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORP ORATION, Appellant

v.

SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee

______________________

2016

- 2135

______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015

- 00156.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

P AUL A SHLEY A INSWORTH , Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by B YRON L EROY P ICKARD
, L ORI A. G ORDON
, M ICHAEL B RADLEY R AY

.

J EFFREY B RAGALONE , Bragalone Conroy PC, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by J USTIN K IMBLE
, D ANIEL F LETCHER O LEJKO
, T ERRY S AAD

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN
, C HEN
, and S TOLL
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Robert F. Woods, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: December 10, 2004



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ROBERT F.
WOODS                                           
|Robert F. Woods Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

COREY CUNNINGHAM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-807

[August 4, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Rothschild, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 93-17507CF10A.

Corey Cunningham, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S150]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          NOTICES OF HEARINGS

               COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES

  Mr. BINGAMAN. Mr. President, I would like to announce for the 
information of the Senate and the public that a hearing has been 
scheduled before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. 
The hearing will be held on Thursday, January 8, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., in 
room SD-366 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  The purpose of the hearing is to receive testimony on current energy 
security challenges.
  Because of the limited time available for the hearing, witnesses may 
testify by invitation only. However, those wishing to submit written 
testimony for the hearing record may do so by sending it to the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, 
Washington, D.C. 20510-6150, or by e-mail to 
Rosemarie_Calabro@energy.senate.gov.
  For further information, please contact Tara Billingsley at (202) 
224-4756 or Rosemarie Calabro at (202) 224-5039.

               COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES

  Mr. BINGAMAN. Mr. President, I would like to announce for the 
information of the Senate and the public that a hearing has been 
scheduled before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. 
The hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 13, 2009, at 10 a.m., in 
room SD-366 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  The purpose of the hearing is to consider the nomination of Steven 
Chu to be Secretary of Energy.
  Because of the limited time available for the hearing, witnesses may 
testify by invitation only. However, those wishing to submit written 
testimony for the hearing record may do so by sending it to the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, 
Washington, D.C. 20510-6150, or by e-mail to 
Amanda_Kelly@energy.senate.gov.
  For further information, please contact Sam Fowler at (202) 224-7571 
or Amanda Kelly at (202) 224-6836.

               COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES

  Mr. BINGAMAN. Mr. President, I would like to announce for the 
information of the Senate and the public that a hearing has been 
scheduled before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. 
The hearing will be held on Thursday, January 15, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., 
in room SD-366 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  The purpose of the hearing is to consider the nomination of Ken 
Salazar to be Secretary of the Interior.
  Because of the limited time available for the hearing, witnesses may 
testify by invitation only. However, those wishing to submit written 
testimony for the hearing record may do so by sending it to the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, 
Washington, D.C. 20510-6150, or by e-mail to 
Amanda_Kelly@energy.senate.gov.
  For further information, please contact Sam Fowler at (202) 224-7571 
or Amanda Kelly at (202) 224-6836.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Sasnett,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 9, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/
      David W. SasnettDavid
      W. SasnettExecutive
      Vice President & Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,863
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              99
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,973
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          38,296
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            38,209
<LOANS>                                         70,539
<ALLOWANCE>                                        999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,537
<DEPOSITS>                                     104,862
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,581
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,100
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 117,537
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,003
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,234
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    67
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,304
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,688
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,688
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,616
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      184
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    560
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         560
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.91
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   811
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  999
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Oscar Taylor and Denise Taylor v. Adrienne A. Henny and Damon K.

Henny

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00650

- CV

Trial court case number: 2008

- 40075

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

Appellants, Oscar D. Taylor and Denise Taylor, filed a “Motion to Abate or, In the

Alternative, Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal.” We deny the request to

abate this appeal, but grant appellants ’ alternative request to extend the time for filing their

notice of appeal to August 4, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 28, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 457 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-379, K2025-377.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27175 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
•,.l&!'-it n S•.•.^r ( O-'- o tiu.Li.-.; .

77 1 fiiifi-'.n'l.'ii l i'^i . riOV.'.-.lM' t

SiiJlI T

. 1'j( l );. t AHM^ F ME ' Gu.i t 3? 5 Crr-.' T RA'II'?' . ' * 52.'.^ ' (3lO!."=M-'i33 ! 

# Bnitcil 3tatc 6 Senat e CHAflLnSn . GRASGLCY WASHINGTON . D C 20!: . 10-150 1 Augus t 2 , 201 0 The Hononibl c RiJ

y l-.'illoo d Sccrciar y U.S . Dcp«'"i"^^" ^ ofrriuisporuiiio n 120 0 New Jersey Avenu e S E Washingion , D

C 2059 0 Dc.irSccrcinrvLaMocjci : ' " K'. ! "• ] i,|p,-. i i:rn;i,r., : nj., 1 P^ , 1 ; . :i/Ji;Ti.S:i..-. t

r S.i w ::u•..l«^••;o;-•;?.^ ; •7-;' : :M3-ie.- u

. " .'IH'.V'.U'';:;-'3.-..;•.•. c •.'.'••i'£i-i.>: . l

A uo;t.i''.-:n / iji'j : ;3:-'i.''.. T
..i.^<f) I "^iiuB.v.RiJUiii;.; ;

—- 1 > o >:=^— ' C O I wa s rcccml v contacie dreuardin g Ui e Small Coni.iii.nii y Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

I ro..rani 'innlic-^uon (bocke l H OS T - 2010-0124 ^ suhtniite db y ih e Siou x Ciaicwa y A>rport/Col . liitdUa

> r el di n Sioux Ciiv . Iowa . I as k

.ha t thi s applicatio n b e given al l du e consideration . An

y inlbrmatio n o r

assistanc e yot . coul dprovid e m e wit h respec t to thi s issu e wouldbe greatly appreciated . Than k yo u fo r your tim e an deffor

t o n thi s matter . I

f I ma y b e o f an y assistanc e wiili thi s application , ple'iis c contac t m y offic e a t 202-224-3744 . Sincerely .
Charle s I: . Grassle y Unite dState s Senato r Cr.G/s k

FINANC E Ci)niiriiit(.r ; Aur.innnnMHv BUDGE T JLIDICIAH Y AGHlCULlUK E Crj-CHAiRWAfj , INTERNATIONA L NAnCOTlC S CONTRO L CAUCU S ir.'jitDiir:rrr:ki'.ir.iji'-MM '
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 2‐78713, 333-83336, 333-105999and 333-110739) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-6210, 333-89711 and 333-111555) ofAlcan Inc., of our report, dated 16 March 2005 relating to the financialstatements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and our Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada‐U.S.Reporting Difference dated 16 March 2005 which appears in the Annual Report toShareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form10-K.

|                  |  | ** **                     |
|------------------|--|--------------------------------|
|                  |  |                                |
|                  |  |                                |
| Montreal, Canada |  |                                |
| 16 March 2005    |  | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|                  |  | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     |