alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM MORAN
TRANSPORTATION COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                       433
<INVENTORY>                                      4,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,060
<PP&E>                                         124,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,604
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,267
<SALES>                                         78,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,790
<CGS>                                           55,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (48)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,487
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,716
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,771
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    62.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    59.98
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6605

FREEMAN WRAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CECILIA R. REYNOLDS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District 

Judge. (2:09-cv-02676-RBH)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freeman Wray, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Freeman Wray seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition as untimely. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) 

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Wray has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
Page 1 of 1

**To:** XXXXXXXX
**From:** XXXXXXXXX **Subject:** SEC results of XXXXX polymer sample
**Date:** 07 February 2011
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of G/O International, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB/A-3 for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Brian E. Rodriguez, President, Treasurer and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Dated: 4/26/07                               /s/Brian E. Rodriguez -----------                            ---------------------- Brian E. Rodriguez President Treasurer Director
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S353]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Byrd).
  The assistant legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                 Washington, DC, January 14, 2009.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the 
     Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable 
     Benjamin L. Cardin, a Senator from the State of Maryland, to 
     perform the duties of the Chair.
                                                   Robert C. Byrd,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. CARDIN thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```
GRANT OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT MONITORING STATEMENT

Recipient Name ___________________________________________________________ 

Grant Number ________________ 

I. MONITORING ACTION PERFORMED (For example, Review of financial status report dated 

2/15/10 for period 1/1/09 - 12/31/09) 

II. FINDINGS

 

 

 

 

 

III. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MONITORING OFFICIAL ________________________________________ ______________ 

 (Signature) Date 

__________________________________________________________ 

(Printed or Typed Name, Organization, and Telephone No.)

Attach Additional Sheets If Necessary 

Distribution: Grant File
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2043/2004

of 26 November 2004         

prohibiting fishing for greater silver smelt by vessels flying the flag of Ireland

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Catches of great silver smelt in the waters of ICES zone III, IV (Community waters and waters not under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of third countries) by vessels flying the flag of Ireland or registered in Ireland are hereby deemed to have exhausted the quota allocated to Ireland for 2004.

Fishing for great silver smelt in the waters of ICES zone III, IV, (Community waters and waters not under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of third countries) by vessels flying the flag of Ireland or registered in Ireland is hereby prohibited, as are the retention on board, transhipment and landing of this stock caught by the above vessels after the date of application of this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply with effect from 1 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 November 2004.

For the Commission

Jörgen HOLMQUIST            

Director-General for Fisheries

----

(1)OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1954/2003 (OJ L 289, 7.11.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 356, 31.12.2002, p. 1.

----
## Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission Launches New Electronic Filing System

**OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION LAUNCHES NEW ELECTRONIC FILING (E-FILING) SYSTEM**

Chair Cynthia L. Attwood today announces the launch of an "e-file" system for electronic filing and service of litigation documents before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the independent Federal agency that decides disputes involving alleged violations of workplace safety rules. Modernizing the Agency's procedures and bringing it into the 21st century has been a years-long process and Chair Attwood praised the much-anticipated development, which will greatly facilitate increased efficiency in case docketing and management both inside the Agency and for the parties who appear before it.

This innovation also directly supports the Review Commission's strategic and annual performance plans, which are focused on engendering respect for the rule of law by assuring fair, just, and expeditious adjudication of disputes brought before the Commission and its judges; expanding transparency and openness by providing for stakeholder engagement and ensuring that the Review Commission keeps interested parties and the public it serves informed of the agency's work at all levels; and providing responsible stewardship of Agency resources to enhance Agency operations and efficiencies in information management, financial management, human resources, and real property to accomplish the Agency's statutory and regulatory mandates. 

It is anticipated that the e-file system will be available beginning September 1, 2016. Any updates regarding start-up will be posted on the Commission's website at www.oshrc.gov.

E-file assistance is available at: mp.support@oshrc.gov
EXHIBIT 21

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES

Subsidiaries of the Company and the jurisdiction in which each company was incorporated are listed below. Unless otherwise indicated parenthetically,
100% of the voting securities of each subsidiary are owned by the Company. All companies indicated with an asterisk (*) are subsidiaries of AMVAC. All of the following subsidiaries are included in the Companys consolidated financial
statements:



|                                                        |  |                
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|AMVAC Chemical Corporation                              |  | California     
|GemChem, Inc.                                           |  | California     
|2110 Davie Corporation (formerly ABSCO Distributing)    |  | California     
|AMVAC Chemical UK Ltd.*                                 |  | Surrey, England
|AMVAC Chemical GmbH                                     |  | Switzerland    
|AMVAC do Brasil Representácoes Ltda                     |  | Brasil         
|Agroservicios Amvac, SA de CV                           |  | Mexico         
|Quimica Amvac de Mexico SA de CV                        |  | Mexico         
|AMVAC de Costa Rica Sociedad Anonima                    |  | Costa Rica     
|Environmental Mediation, Inc.                           |  | California     
|Calhart Corporation                                     |  | California     
|Manufacturers Mirror & Glass Co., Inc.                  |  | California     
|Todagco (80%)*                                          |  | California     
|American Vanguard Corporation of Imperial Valley (90%)* |  | California     
|AMVAC Ag-Chem*                                          |  | California     
|AMVAC Chemical Corporation-Nevada*                      |  | Nevada
Exhibit 21
                                                                      ----------
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

                                                                 Jurisdiction of
         Subsidiary                                              Organization
         ----------                                              ---------------
AMREP Southwest Inc.                                             New Mexico
      AMREPCO Inc.                                               Colorado
      Eldorado at Santa Fe, Inc.                                 New Mexico
El Dorado Utilities, Inc.                                        New Mexico
Kable Media Services, Inc.                                       Delaware
      Kable News Company, Inc.                                   Illinois
         Kable Fulfillment Services, Inc.                        Delaware
         Kable Fulfillment Services of Ohio, Inc.                Delaware
         Kable News Company of Canada, Ltd.                      Ontario, Canada
      Kable Distribution Services, Inc.                          Delaware
         Kable News Export, Ltd.                                 Delaware
         Kable News International, Inc.                          Delaware
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92199-92200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27201]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 724 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 92200]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-405, K2025-403.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27201 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
#### WILLIAM JONES, Chairman, &c. *v.*WILLIAM MONTFORT et al.

A bond given by a sheriff; with a condition to return process and pay over monies &c., “ and in all things well &c. to execute the said office,” is not broken by a neglect to collect and pay the parish taxes.

The cases of Crumpler *v.*the Governor, 1 Dev. 52, and of the Governor *v.*Mat-lock, ib. 214 approved.

Debt upon a bond executed by the defendants as the surities of Boyd Fonville, for the faithful discharge of his duties as sheriff of Onslow. The breach assigned was that Fonville had not paid over to the wardens of the poor the parish taxes for the year 1831.

Upon *oyer*the condition of the bond declared on was as follows:

“The condition of the above obligation is such, that whereas the above bounded B. F. hath been constituted and appointed sheriff, &c. Now in case the said B. F. shall well and truly execute and due return make of all process and precepts to him directed, and pay satisfy all fees and sums of money by him received or levied by virtue of any process, into the proper office to which the same by the tenor thereof ought to be paid, or to the persons to whom the same shall be due,his heirs, &c. and in all other things well, truly and faithfully execute the said office of sheriff, during his continuance therein, then &c. *Pleas*— Performance and *non infregerunt conventionem.*

On the trial before Nash, Judge, on the Spring Circuit of 1837., his Honor ruled the default assigned as a breach, was not within the condition, and thereupon the plaintiff offered to prove by parol that the parish taxes were intended to be *74secured by the bond declared on. His Honor rejected this testimony, and the plaintiff submitted to a non-suit and appealed.

June, 1838.

*fía(iger*for plaintiff.

*J. H. Bryan*for the defendant.

Gaston, Judge.

The condition of the bond declared on in this case corresponds *precisely*with that which was under the consideration of the Court in the case of the Governor *v.*Matlock, (1 Dev. 213.) It there received a judicial construction by which it was held not *to extend to*the fiscal duties of the office. The decision then made was in conformity to the principle before established in the cases of Grumpier *v.*the Governor, 1 Dev. 52, and the Governor v. Barr, 1 Dev. 65, that the general words in the conclusion of the condition shall be restricted by the preceding particular words, to duties of a like kind with those specified. To hold any other doctrine now, and to put a different construction on the words in the condition of this bond from that so authoritatively assigned to the same words heretofore, would be to fly in the face of former adjudications, and to introduce the most perplexing confusion.

The instruction of the Judge to the jury was in conformity to the settled law of the country, and the rejection of the offered evidence to explain the bond was unquestionably correct.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00566-CR

DIEGO SANCHEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 175th District Court of Bexar County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2012-CR-7790).

The cause heard today by the Court is an appeal from the judgment signed by the 

court below on June 9, 2014. After inspecting the record of the court below, it is the 

opinion of this Court that there is no reversible error in the judgment. It is therefore 

CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the judgment of the court below be 

affirmed.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered July 7, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
2-78856, Registration Statement No. 33-47359, Registration Statement No.
333-47546 and Registration Statement No. 333-42439 of American Indemnity
Financial Corporation on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 13, 1998 appearing
in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American
Indemnity Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1997.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
March 26, 1998
EXHIBIT 15





AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








MidAmerican Energy Company


Des Moines, Iowa





We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited consolidated interim financial information of MidAmerican Energy Company and subsidiary for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, as indicated in our report dated August 6, 2010; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.





We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-153777 on Form S-3.





We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.








/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Des Moines, Iowa


August 6, 2010
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for August 2019 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 18

2. Cases Added to Docket 0 

 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket 0 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 18
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Sento Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley J. Cutler, Senior Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/
Stanley J. Cutler

Stanley
J. Cutler
Senior Vice President of Finance (Principal Financial Officer)
June 26, 2002

---

QuickLinks
1

The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1137

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Jesus Trevino-Celaya, also known as *

Arturo Torres Medina, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: May 31, 2002

 Filed: June 5, 2002

___________

Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jesus Trevino-Celaya appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1

 upon

remand for resentencing, arguing that the court should have departed downward from

the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. Having thoroughly reviewed the record,

we affirm the judgment. See U.S.S.G. §§ 5H1.6, 5K2.19; United States v. King, 280

F.3d 886, 889 (8th Cir. 2002); United States v. Maldonado, 242 F.3d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.

2001).
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.