alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
    SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  Form 10-K/A
  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the consolidated financial condition and
    results of operations of Allied.  /s/  Robert
    P. Dowski

/s/  John
    J.
    Marcello.Robert P. Dowski

John J. MarcelloChief Financial Officer

Chief Executive OfficerNovember 7, 2006

November 7, 2006  E-8
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 165 (Tuesday, October 14, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1245]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        House of Representatives

Chamber Action
  The House was not in session today. The House is scheduled to meet at 
11 a.m. on Saturday, January 3, 2009, pursuant to the provisions of H. 
Con. Res. 440.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NitroMed, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Loberg,Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

###### (1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

######  

###### (2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

######  

| Dated: August 16, 2004 |                                   |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                   |                                   |
|                   | /s/ Michael D. Loberg                  |   |
|                   | Michael D. Loberg,  Ph.D.              |
|                   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S  UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000927790
<NAME>                        Union Acceptance Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         20,225
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  253,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,214)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               271,794
<PP&E>                                         12,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,917)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 498,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,376
<BONDS>                                        386,612
<COMMON>                                       58,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     29,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   498,666
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               45,299
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  20,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               3,600               
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             13,290         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,109       
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,129     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,980
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0        
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,980                 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.38
                                                
 

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annul report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: January 18, 2010
    /s/ Andrew C. PlummerAndrew C. Plummer, Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0222 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-007-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 695 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The proposed actions are intended to prevent the forward servo-control hydraulic hoses 

from becoming damaged and leaking hydraulic fluid that could ignite in flight, which can result 

in loss of main rotor control, power loss, structural damage, propagation of fire, and subsequent 

loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $212

Labor per Helicopter

(1 x $85/work-hour)

$85

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $297

Total US Fleet Cost $206,415

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Wilbanks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheet at April 30, 1997 and the unaudited
condensed statement of operations for the three months ended April 30,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,344
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,814
<PP&E>                                         585,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 608,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,885
<BONDS>                                        379,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   608,404
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,867
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,047)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,047)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
ALASKA SEAFOOD CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0652

DCN: 00315CBI

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 43 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule submitted by Secretary of Health 
and Human Services relating to compliance with title X requirements by 
             project recipients in selecting subrecipients.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, 

              

 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services relating to compliance with title X 
requirements by project recipients in selecting subrecipients (81 Fed. 
Reg. 91852; December 19, 2016), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 16, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule submitted by Secretary of Health 
and Human Services relating to compliance with title X requirements by 
             project recipients in selecting subrecipients.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited  financial  statements of Quality  Stores,  Inc. at and for the period
ended  October 28, 2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such
financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                         9,279
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,338)
<INVENTORY>                                    422,670
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               457,379
<PP&E>                                         177,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (38,876)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 895,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          222,445
<BONDS>                                        430,654
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     236,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   895,762
<SALES>                                        858,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               858,534
<CGS>                                          606,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  606,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               223,354
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             35,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,105)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (498)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,607)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,607)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Research conducted by: Betty S. Chambers Page 1 of 2

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 15

August 27, 1984

Brent Blauch, Director

Office of Environmental Energy Management

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120

TOPIC: REPROCESSING OF ABANDONED COAL REFUSE PILES AND COAL SILT DAMS 

ON ABANDONED MINE LANDS

INQUIRY: Conduct a search of the provisions under state regulatory programs concerning the 

reprocessing of coal refuse piles and coal silt dams on abandoned mine lands. Include within 

the investigation: state rules and regulations; application requirements; bonding requirements; 

revegetation requirements; and special variance procedures to allow mining activities within 

these restricted areas.

SEARCH RESULTS:

A search of COALEX was conducted to identify coal refuse processing requirements on 

abandoned mine lands that differ from the general regulatory standards applied to other forms 

of surface coal mining. None were identified. In both the federal and state regulatory programs 

under SMCRA, the reprocessing of abandoned coal refuse piles and coal silt dams are included 

under the definition of "surface coal mining activity" and the general permitting, bonding and 

performance standards apply. (See 30 CFR Secs. 701.5 and 870.5)

The following state regulatory provisions were identified as specifically addressing the issue of 

reprocessing abandoned coal refuse disposal areas and are attached.

The West Virginia regulations contain, as special requirements, a section addressing the 

"reprocessing or removal of abandoned refuse disposal areas". (Coal Refuse Disposal Regs.; 

West Virginia Surface Mining Reclamation Regs.; Department of Natural Resources; Chapter 

20-6; Series VIII (1981))

The Kentucky regulatory program provides a special provision for "lands acquired or reclaimed 

by the state containing coal, coal refuse or other marketable minerals which should be removed" 

to become designated small operator projects. (Kentucky Surface Mining Law: KRS Sec. 

350.450, as revised (12/31/80))

ATTACHMENTS:

A. Excerpts from Coal Refuse Disposal Regs.; West Virginia Surface Mining Reclamation 

Regs.; Department of Natural Resources; Chapter 20-6; Series VIII (1981).

1. Sec. C.01: Standard Permits or Plans and Specification.

2. Sec. C.02: Special Permits.

3. Sec. D.06: Submittal Requirements; Reprocessing on Removal of Abandoned Coal 

Refuse Disposal Piles.
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Research conducted by: Betty S. Chambers Page 2 of 2

4. Sec. E.09: Performance Standards; Material Removal.

5. Sec. B: Definition of "Abandoned Coal Refuse Disposal Area".

B. Excerpt from Kentucky Surface Mining Law: KRS Sec. 350.450, as revised (12/31/80): 

Technical Assistance for small operator.
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by:Joyce Zweben Scall Page 1 of 2

COALEX STATE COMPARISON REPORT - 314

February 1995

Charles Gardner, Director

Division of Land Resources

Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources

P.O. Box 27687

Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687

TOPIC: REGULATION OF NON-COAL ON FEDERAL LANDS

INQUIRY: North Carolina currently exempts non-coal mining operations located on

U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service lands from complying with state

reclamation laws. Do other IMCC-member states allow the same exemption?

SEARCH RESULTS: Seven IMCC-member states were contacted by phone regarding

regulation of non-coal mining operations on federal forest service lands in their states:

Alabama, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West

Virginia. Of these, only two states, Alabama and South Carolina, exempt non-coal

mining operations from the requirement to obtain a state permit and comply with state

regulations for reclamation, bonding, etc. Alabama encourages these mining operations

to comply with reclamation regulations. South Carolina, at its discretion, may require a

non-coal mining operation on federal lands to obtain a permit. The remaining states

indicated that state regulations for non-coal mines apply to all operations; the

regulations do not differentiate between those operations located on state lands versus

those on federal lands.

Specific state responses to the survey are attached.

Survey conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall

TABLE OF RESPONSES

QUESTION: DOES YOUR STATE EXEMPT NON-COAL MINING OPERATIONS

LOCATED ON FEDERAL LANDS FROM COMPLYING WITH STATE PERMTITING

AND RECLAMATION REQUIREMENTS?

STATE YES/NO DETAILS

ALABAMA YES Non-coal mining operations located on federal lands are

not required to obtain a state permit. Such Operations are
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by:Joyce Zweben Scall Page 2 of 2

not required to meet state reclamation regulations but are

encouraged to do so.

KENTUCKY NO There is no exemption for non-coal mining operations

located on federal lands. All operations follow the same

regulations.

PENNSYLVANIA NO All non-coal mining operations are required to follow state

laws regardless of whether they are Located on state or

federal lands.

SOUTH

CAROLINA

YES At the state's discretion, a non-coal mining operator may

be required to obtain a permit for mining on federal lands.

Prior to 1990, non-coal mining on federal lands was

totally exempt from state permitting requirements.

TENNESSEE NO All non-coal mining operations are required to follow state

laws.

VIRGINIA NO The state non-coal regulatory program applies to all such

operations regardless of location.

WEST VIRGINIA NO There is no exclusion fornon-coal mining operations

located on federal forest service lands. All non-coal

operations are regulated the same under state statutes.
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for January 2018

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month					29

2. Cases Added to Docket						  2

Valmet, Inc. 
No. 17-0909 
Direction for Review and Remand Order on January 11, 2018

Coleman Hammons Construction Co., Inc.
No. 17-0992
Direction for Review on January 25, 2018 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket					  -1

Valmet, Inc. 
No. 17-0909 
Direction for Review and Remand Order on January 11, 2018

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month					30
## James J. Sullivan, Jr. Sworn-In As OSHRC Commissioner

# Press Release

**James J. Sullivan, Jr. Sworn-In As OSHRC Commissioner**

James J. Sullivan, Jr. was sworn-in today as Commissioner of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. Mr. Sullivan was nominated by President Trump to fill a term expiring April 27, 2021 and was unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate on August 3, 2017. He fills the seat previously held by former Chairman Thomasina V. Rogers.

Prior to joining the Review Commission, Mr. Sullivan was a shareholder with Cozen O'Connor with a practice focused on labor and employment law and workplace safety and heath matters. He recently completed a term as the management co-chair of the American Bar Association Committee on Occupational Safety and Health Law and, previously in his career, was a partner at Pepper Hamilton and a shareholder at Buchanan Ingersoll and Rooney. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Sullivan served as Vice-President of Labor and Employment Law and Deputy General Counsel for Comcast.

Upon his being sworn in as Commissioner, Mr. Sullivan stated, "I am honored to be appointed by the President to serve as a Commissioner on the Review Commission and to have the opportunity to bring my experience to this significant agency in public service to our country. I look forward to working with Chairman MacDougall and Commissioner Attwood."

Mr. Sullivan received a B.A. from the Pennsylvania State University and a J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center.

The Review Commission is an independent Federal agency tasked with adjudicating disputes under the Occupational Safety and Health Act between the Department of Labor, employers, and employees arising from contested workplace safety inspections.
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 36 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2017 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the 

Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 36 RDS 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu2 reau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Waste Prevention, 

3 Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conserva4 tion’’ (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 83008 (November 18, 

5 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 3, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS