alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Pages S165-S166]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS

                                 ______
                                 

                      RETIREMENT OF CHARLENE DAVIS

 Mr. BOND. Mr. President, today I acknowledge and pay tribute 
to Charlene Davis's dedication and service to the people of Missouri as 
she retires from the Jackson County Election Board of Election 
Commissioners after 34 years.
  During her tenure with the board, Charlene has helped modernize our 
election technology, improving the reliability and integrity of 
elections.

[[Page S166]]

  Charlene had the opportunity to design the program to implement punch 
card voting; to design, implement, and monitor the computerized 
database for voter registration; and to implement the National Voting 
Rights Act, making modifications to the database to conform. Charlene 
has been instrumental to making the voting process in the State of 
Missouri a secure one.
  Charlene was also implemental in securing the new electronic voting 
system required by Help America Vote Act. As a sponsor of the Help 
America Vote Act, I express my gratitude to Charlene in executing this 
program.
  She has been an active member of The International Association of 
Clerks, Recorders, Election Officials & Treasurers since 1981, serving 
as State director from Missouri for 10 years, treasurer of IACREOT and 
special assistant to the president in 2004.
  Charlene received her formal education from the University of 
Missouri, in Columbia, MO, where she majored in math and physics.
  She and her husband Wade are the parents of three married children, 
and they have eight grandchildren.
  Charlene, congratulations on your well-deserved retirement and best 
wishes for your future endeavors.

                          ____________________
```
#### DEN ON DEM. OF JOHN McENTIRE *vs.*ARCHILEES DURHAM.

A purchaser at a Sheriff’s sale of land, under execution, is only bound to shew a judgment, execution and the sheriff’s deed. He is not bound to shew a levy by the sheriff. His title is complete as against the defendant in the execution.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Rutherford County, at the Fall Term, 1846, his. Honor Judge Calcwei.l presiding.

*152The plaintiff claimed title to the lands in dispute as a purchaser, at ' a sale made by the sheriff; and, on the trial of the case, he offered in evidence several judgments rendered against the defendant, in Rutherford Superior Court, in favor of third persons ; also executions issuing thereon, a sheriff’s deed covering the premises, and proved the defendant in possession of the same. The sheriff was examined, and testified, that said lands were sold by virtue of said executions. It was insisted for the defendant, that it ought to appear, that a levy on the land had been made by the Sheriff, and that he had acted under it. The Court charged the jury, that to entitle the plaintiff to their verdict, in a case of this kind, he must show a judgment against the defendant; an execution issuing thereon, and corresponding with said judgment, a Sheriff’s deed covering the premises, and that the defendant was in possession, when the suit was brought; and if he made out these facts, he was, *prima facie,*entitled to their verdict.

The jury found for the plaintiff, and on a new trial being refused, the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court!

*Alexander*and *Bynum,*for the plaintiff.

*Guión,*for the defendant.

Daniel, J.

The executions, which were issued on the judgments against Durham, bound his lands from the *teste*of the same. The Sheriff was the proper officer to sell the land and raise the money to satisfy the said executions. The Sheriff on the trial, proved, that he sold the lands by virtue of said executions. The plaintiff showed several judgments and executions against Durham, and then proved a sale of the land by the Sheriff, under those executions, and produced the Sheriff’s deed to himself. That was sufficient to transfer the title to *153him. The objection taken by the defendant, that the Sheriff did not *levy*the executions on the land before he sold them, was, we think, properly overruled by the Judge. There is no law, that we know of, which requires a purchaser of land at a Sheriff’s sale to show, that the executions had been levied on the same, before the sale by the Sheriff to him ; if he shows a judgment, execution sale, and a Sheriff’s deed to himself for the land, he is entitled to recover the possession, as against the defendant in the execution.

Pee Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41045

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

JOSE INFANTE-HERNANDEZ , 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:14-CR-870-1 

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Infante-Hernandez has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Infante-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41045 Document: 00514072351 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2017
No. 15-41045

2 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41045 Document: 00514072351 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 14, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 587 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-226, K2025-224.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26334 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on July 31, 2016

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 09-1901 Seward Ship’s 

Drydock, Inc. 11/14/11 DFR 11/21/11, 04/17/13 Closed

2 10-1372 Briones Utility Co. 08/20/12 DFR 09/05/12 Closed

3 08-1774 Angelica Textile 

Services, Inc. 09/28/12 DFR 10/16/12 Closed

4 11-2395 Kiewit Power 

Constructors Co. 01/24/13 DFR 03/04/13 Closed

5 12-0643 K.M. Davis 

Contracting, Inc. 01/25/13 DFR 01/30/13 Closed

6 10-2096

United Contractors 

Midwest, Inc. d/b/a 

R.A. Cullinan & 

Son

03/20/13 DFR 03/29/13 Closed

7 11-2780 Peacock 

Engineering, Inc. 05/22/13 DFR 05/30/13 Closed

8 11-1734 Calpine 

Corporation 06/24/13 DFR 06/26/13 Closed

9 10-0637

BP Products North 

America, Inc., & 

BP-Husky 

Refining, LLC

09/16/13 DFR 11/01/13 Closed

10 11-2559 Jim Boyd 

Construction, Inc. 01/22/14 DFR 01/31/14 Closed

11 12-1600 Envision Waste 

Services 02/10/14 DFR 02/24/1404/16/14 Closed

12 13-1034

Empire Roofing 

Company 

Southeast, LLC

04/11/14 DFR 05/05/14 Closed

13 12-2142

Meadows 

Construction 

Company, LLC

06/05/14 DFR 06/24/14 Closed

14 12-2385 Evergreen 

Construction Co. 08/11/14 DFR 10/24/14 Closed

15 12-1617 Houston 

Aquarium, Inc. 09/18/14 DFR 10/20/14 Closed

16 13-1022

Mid South 

Waffles, Inc., d/b/a 

Waffle House 

#1283

12/31/14 DFR 02/03/15 Closed

17 14-0948 Florida Gas 

Contractors, Inc. 01/15/15 DFR 02/06/15 Closed

18 12-1287 CSA Equipment 

Company, LLC 01/16/15 DFR 02/09/15 Closed
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on July 31, 2016

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

19 13-0224 A.H. Sturgill 

Roofing, Inc. 03/23/15 DFR 04/08/15 Closed

20 13-1817 Missouri Basin 

Well Service Inc. 04/23/15 DFR 05/07/15 Closed

21 14-0844 Quick Transport of 

Arkansas, LLC 07/01/15 DFR 07/28/15 Closed

22 13-1124 Integra Health 

Management, Inc. 07/21/15 DFR 09/18/15 Closed

23 13-0900 Suncor Energy 

(U.S.A.) Inc. 08/31/15 DFR 09/18/15 Closed

24 13-1169 North Eastern 

Precast LLC 10/29/15 DFR 11/02/15 Closed

25 13-1170 Masonry Services 

Inc. dba MSI 10/29/15 DFR 11/02/15 Closed

26 13-0644 Wynnewood 

Refining Co., LLC 03/03/16 DFR 03/18/16 Open

27 13-0791 Wynnewood 

Refining Co., LLC 03/03/16 DFR 03/18/16 Open

28 14-1688

Science 

Applications 

International 

Corp., d/b/a SAIC

06/23/16 DFR

29 15-1121 Clean Fuels of 

Indiana, Inc. 06/30/16 DFR

30 15-1121

Dover High 

Performance 

Plastics

07/19/16 DFR

*DFR – Direction for Review

REM – Appellate Remand

INT REV - Interlocutory Review
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

February 27, 2007



/S/    PHILIP L.
GOULDINGPhilip L. GouldingPrincipal Financial Officer
----

| Subject: | [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND      FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR      CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]. |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Reference: | Purchase      Agreement No. 3219 (the Purchase Agreement) between The Boeing Company      (Boeing) and American Airlines, Inc.(Customer) |
|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1.   | [CONFIDENTIAL      PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITHTHE |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (i) | [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND      FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR      CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND      FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR      CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### Commonwealth *v.*Hughes, Appellant (No. 2).

February 25, 1907:

Argued Dec. 10, 1906.

Appeal, No. 17, Jan. T., 1907, by defendant, from order of Q. S. Luzerne Co., Jan. T., 1906, No. 151, refusing to quash the array of grand jurors in case of Commonwealth v. H. H. Hughes.

Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Orlad y, Head and Beaver, JJ.

Affirmed.

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

This appeal brings up the same questions which were considered in the case of the Commonwealth v. the same defend*35ant, post, p. 90, in which case an opinion has been this day-filed. For the reasons therein given this judgment is affirmed and the record remitted to the court below that the sentence may be executed according to law.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 148 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 148

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 3628, the Secretary of the Senate 
shall make the following 

              

correction: Strike ``November 30, 2018'' each place such term appears 
and insert ``December 7, 2018''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 21, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 148

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make a correction in the 
                    enrollment of the bill S. 3628.
```
# Official Journal L 331/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 331 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6220 December 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 331

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6220 December 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2019/2143 of 11 November 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Trade Committee established under the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part, as regards the amendment of Annexes II and VIII to Protocol II of the Agreement | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2019/2143 of 11 November 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Trade Committee established under the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part, as regards the amendment of Annexes II and VIII to Protocol II of the Agreement

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 478 

Expressing support for the designation of June 2, 2016, as ‘‘National Gun 

Violence Awareness Day’’ and June 2016 as ‘‘National Gun Violence 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2016 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Mr. COONS, Mr. KAINE, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. 

CASEY, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. BOOKER, 

Mr. REED, and Ms. WARREN) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of June 2, 2016, 

as ‘‘National Gun Violence Awareness Day’’ and June 

2016 as ‘‘National Gun Violence Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas, each year, more than— 

(1) 32,000 people in the United States are killed 

and 80,000 are injured by gunfire; 

(2) 11,000 people in the United States are killed in 

homicides involving firearms; 

(3) 21,000 people in the United States commit suicide by using firearms; and 

(4) 500 people in the United States are killed in accidental shootings; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 478 IS 

Whereas, since 1968, more people of the United States have 

died from guns in the United States than on the battlefields of all the wars in the history of the United States; 

Whereas, by 1 count in 2015 in the United States, there 

were— 

(1) 372 mass shooting incidents in which not fewer 

than 4 people were killed or wounded by gunfire; and 

(2) 64 incidents in which a gun was fired in a 

school; 

Whereas gun violence typically escalates during the summer 

months; 

Whereas, every 70 minutes, 1 person in the United States 

under 25 years of age dies because of gun violence, and 

more than 6,300 such individuals die annually, including 

Hadiya Pendleton, who, in 2013, was killed at 15 years 

of age while standing in a Chicago park; and 

Whereas, on June 2, 2016, on what would have been Hadiya 

Pendleton’s 19th birthday, people across the United 

States will recognize National Gun Violence Awareness 

Day and wear orange in tribute to Hadiya and other victims of gun violence and their loved ones: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports— 

3 (A) the designation of June 2016 as ‘‘Na4 tional Gun Violence Awareness Month’’ and the 

5 goals and ideals of that month; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 478 IS 

1 (B) the designation of June 2, 2016, as 

2 ‘‘National Gun Violence Awareness Day’’ in re3 membrance of the victims of gun violence; and 

4 (2) calls on the people of the United States 

5 to— 

6 (A) promote greater awareness of gun vio7 lence and gun safety; 

8 (B) wear orange, the color that hunters 

9 wear to show that they are not targets, on June 

10 2; 

11 (C) concentrate heightened attention on 

12 gun violence during the summer months, when 

13 gun violence typically increases; and 

14 (D) bring citizens and community leaders 

15 together to discuss ways to make communities 

16 safer. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ALLEN WADE VELA,

Petitioner

v.

R. IRWIN, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI

FOREST,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 28 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of September , 2023, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DISMISSED

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6176

CARLOS E. GONZALEZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JON E. OZMINT; HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney

General for South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-04-2420-2-13)

Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 29, 2005

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos E. Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Carlos E. Gonzalez, a South Carolina prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Gonzalez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED