alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 16 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative postage stamp should 

be issued in honor of the Buffalo Soldiers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mrs. BEATTY (for herself, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Ms. NORTON, Mr. GRIJALVA, 

Mr. CONYERS, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MOORE, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. LEWIS of 

Georgia, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. CLAY, and Mr. RYAN of Ohio) 

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative 

postage stamp should be issued in honor of the Buffalo 

Soldiers. 

Whereas, on July 28, 1866, Congress established six allBlack regiments, later consolidated to four, to help rebuild the country after the Civil War and to patrol the 

remote western frontier during the Indian wars; 

Whereas Colonel Charles Young was a Buffalo Soldier and 

the highest ranking African-American commanding officer in the United States Army from 1894 until his death 

in 1922; 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 16 IH 

Whereas more than 200,000 African-Americans served in 

World War I and more than 1 million served in World 

War II; 

Whereas the Buffalo Soldiers received their name because of 

the buffalo’s fierce bravery and fighting spirit; 

Whereas African-American troops accepted the name, Buffalo 

Soldiers, with pride and honor; 

Whereas the Buffalo Soldiers fought alongside White regiments in many conflicts and were instrumental in the exploration and settlement of western lands; 

Whereas, over the 82 years of the Buffalo Soldiers’ existence, 

23 men received the Congressional Medal of Honor, the 

highest recognition awarded by the United States Government for military service; 

Whereas the Buffalo Soldiers ceased to exist in 1948 when 

President Harry Truman signed Executive Order 9981 

mandating equal treatment and opportunity for AfricanAmerican servicemen; 

Whereas the Buffalo Soldiers are a significant part of American military history; 

Whereas a stamp was issued in honor of the Buffalo Soldiers 

on April 22, 1994, and this stamp was placed on ‘‘off 

sale’’ in December 1995; and 

Whereas reissuing a postage stamp to honor the Buffalo Soldiers is fitting and proper: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be 

4 issued in honor of the Buffalo Soldiers; and 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 16 IH 

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

3 such a stamp be issued. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 187 (Friday, December 12, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1323]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
  No committee meetings were held.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                          42,214
<SECURITIES>                                     4,647
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,092)
<INVENTORY>                                     37,173
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,357
<PP&E>                                          37,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,515)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,296
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                     131,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   179,216
<SALES>                                        171,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,084
<CGS>                                           95,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                88,513<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,563
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  79
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,468)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,860)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,608)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,608)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)
<FN>
<F1>Includes $16,870 of merger costs, special charges and in-process R&D
</FN>


</TABLE>
-  About OSMRE 
          General Information
-  OSMRE Map 
-  State and Tribal Contacts 
Mission and Vision
-  History 
Offices and Organization
-  OSMRE Principal Deputy Director 
-  OSMRE Deputy Director 
-  Volunteers and Internships 
OSMRE Organization Chart

# Principal Deputy Director

## Sharon Buccino, Principal Deputy Director

On January 2, 2024, Sharon Buccino joined the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement as the Principal Deputy Director. While leading the agency, Sharon will focus on advancing OSMRE’s mission of ensuring that coal mines are operated in a manner that protects citizens and the environment, land is restored to beneficial use following mining, and that the impacts of historic coal mining are addressed in order to improve the health, environment, and economic opportunities of communities in coal country.

Sharon comes to OSMRE from Laramie, Wyoming, where she has been teaching as an adjunct at the University of Wyoming's College of Law and served on the City of Laramie's Planning Commission. On the commission, Sharon focused on housing, growth management, and local economic development, and was selected as the Wyoming Planning Commissioner of the Year for 2023.

Sharon has over 30 years of experience practicing administrative, environmental, and energy law. She has been an active member of the Foundation for Natural Resource and Energy Law.

Sharon is originally from Lakeland, Florida, where she grew up surrounded by cattle, orange groves, and phosphate mines. She has two adult daughters and currently lives with her husband in Laramie.
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 133 

Providing for the reappointment of Barbara M. Barrett as a citizen regent 

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2018 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. COLE, and Ms. MATSUI) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of Barbara M. Barrett as 

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on 

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Barbara M. Barrett 

8 of Arizona on January 10, 2019, is filled by the reappoint9 ment of the incumbent. The appointment is for a term 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 133 IH 

1 of 6 years, beginning on January 11, 2019, or the date 

2 of the enactment of this joint resolution, whichever occurs 

3 later. 

Æ 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK U34 Planning Cooperative Agreement Review Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         February 4, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK Democracy II, Suite 7000A 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nisan Bhattacharyya, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney, National Institute of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 668 Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2405,                         *nisan.bhattacharyya@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 12, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-26758 Filed 11-15-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
exh4-1.htm


Exhibit 4.1





	  



	 	  









 


 




 


October 14, 2010









 



	
Re:

	
Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement Dated as of March 28, 2002, as amended (the “Purchase Agreement”)












[Warrantholder]:







Reference is made to the Purchase Agreement and the common stock purchase warrants issued pursuant thereto and currently outstanding as listed on Exhibit A attached to this letter (the “Warrants”).







The Warrants have an expiration date, as extended, of October 14, 2010 (the “Expiration Date”).  The Company has extended the Expiration Date to October 29, 2010.  The Company represents and warrants to each of the holders of the Warrants that all necessary corporate action to authorize the extension of the Expiration Date has been taken and the Company has full power and authority to issue this letter.







For our records, please acknowledge receipt of this letter and your consent to the extension of the Expiration Date of the Warrants to October 29, 2010 by countersigning this letter where indicated below.









	
EVERGREEN ENERGY INC.


	  
	  
	
By:______________________________


	
William G. Laughlin


	
Executive Vice President, General


	
Counsel  & Secretary


	  




















  









1225 17th Street, Suite 1300


Denver, CO USA 80202-5506


www.evgenergy.com




  





  











  










	  



	 	  









 
































The undersigned investors acknowledge and agree to the terms of this letter:













	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
 

	  	  	  	
 


	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
	    	 	
 

	 	 	 	    By:  {Warrantholder}
	 	  	
 

	  	  	  	
 


	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
	
 

	  	 	  	  	  	
By:             


	  	  	
 

	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  	  	  





 


 


 


 




 














1225 17th Street, Suite 1300


Denver, CO USA 80202-5506


www.evgenergy.com




  





  











  






 




	  



	 	  









 







EXHIBIT A







Outstanding Warrants







 


 


 







 


 


 












1225 17th Street, Suite 1300


Denver, CO USA 80202-5506


www.evgenergy.com
Exhibit 18

Superior
TeleCom, Inc.
150 Interstate North Parkway
Suite 110
Atlanta, GA 30339-2101

February 18,
2002

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

This
letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a change in accounting
principle or practice.

In
the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company changed the number of last-in, first-out ("LIFO") pools that it uses to segregate its inventory for the purpose of calculating its
LIFO inventory from three pools to five pools. The change created two separate pools for the copper component of inventories in the United States and Mexico, respectively. According to the management
of the Company, this change was made to more accurately reflect the cost of its products in accordance with the LIFO approach as the change in prices of copper do not mirror the changes in prices of
the other components of its inventory. In addition, the change in mix of copper and the other components of inventory has an effect on the overall LIFO results under the previous method and this
fluctuation will be eliminated under the new more detailed approach.

A
complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative principles has not been established by the
accounting profession. Thus, we cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have reviewed the
pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting, in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is based on our determination made in this manner.

We
are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons stated for the change and our discussions
with you, is also preferable under the circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

Very
truly yours,

/s/
Arthur Andersen

---

QuickLinks
#### State *v. Joyce.*

This was an indictment against the Sheriff of Rock-ingham for a misdemeanor in making a false return to an execution, it appeared in evidence, that the execution against one Nathaniel Williams, for levying a certain sum to satisfy Robinson Mnmford, the Plaintiff, was put into his hands to be executed in due time; that he levied on property more than sufficient to satisfy the debt and costs, and appointed a day of sale, at which time there was but one bidder; and he believing, as having been so advised, that a sale could not legally be made, unless there were two bidders at least, returned upon the execution, that he had not sold for want of bid-tiers. For thi$Jia»wsis indicted, and now upon the trial, it was ruled dearly by Judge Wibliams, that one bidder at a Sheriff’s sale is sufficient ; saying if it was not so, no execution could ever he satisfied where the Defendant Could procure a friend to attend and bid more than the property was worth at the first bid, — He was convicted and fined.

Note. — Vide *State*v. *Johnston, post*293.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         The Allied Defense Group, Inc.
                     (Formerly Allied Research Corporation)

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.   ARC Europe, S.A., a Belgian Corporation

     Wholly-owned and majority owned Belgian subsidiaries of ARC Europe S.A.

     A.   MECAR S.A.

     B.   Sedachim, S.I.

     C.   VSK Electronics N.V.

          (1)   Belgian Automation Units, N.V

          (2)   I.D.C.S., N.V.

          (3)   Vigitec S.A.

          (4)   Tele Technique Generale, S.A.

     D.   Hendrickx N.V.

2.   Allied Research Corporation Limited, a U.K. Corporation

3.   Energa Corporation

4.   News/Sports Microwave Rental, Inc.

5.   Titan Dynamics Systems Inc.

6.   SeaSpace Corporation

                                      E-3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 637 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-286, K2025-284.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26554 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
August 14, 2015 

United States Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, NE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Filed in www.regulations.gov, Docket FAA 2015-2042 

AkinGump 

STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

GREGORY S. WALDEN 

+1 202.887.4213/fax: +1 202.887.4288 

gswalden@akingump.com 

Re: Ascend Aerials LLC Petition for Amendment to Exemption 12322, under Section 

333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act, 49 U.S.C. 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 

11, to add the FreeFly Alta Unmanned Aircraft System 

On behalf of Ascend Aerials LLC ("Ascend Aerials"), we hereby seek an amendment to 

Exemption 12322, granted August 4, to allow Ascend Aerials to operate the FreeFly Alta 

hexacopter unmanned aircraft vehicle and system ("UA V" and "UAS"), to provide the same 

services authorized in Exemption 12322. 

To date, two companies have received a Section 333 exemption from the FAA to operate the 

FreeFly Alta: CopelandRED LLC (Docket 2015-0956) obtained Exemption #12103 on July 21, 

2015; Samuel Fleishman (Docket 2015-1624) obtained Exemption #12362 on August 6, 2015. 1 

Ascend Aerials will comply with the conditions and limitations as set forth in Exemption 12322. 

Accordingly, we respectfully ask the FAA to grant this petition in summary fashion, and obviate 

Federal Register publication and public comment. 

uie Northern 

1 We believe the FAA is in possession ofFreeFiy's Aircraft Flight Manual for the Alta hexacopter UAV. Upon 

request, we will provide a copy of this Manual. 

RobertS. Strauss Building 11333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. 1 Washington, D.C. 20036-1564 1202.887.4000 1 fax 202.887.4288 1 akmgump com