# Official Journal C 207/23 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 207 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6523 May 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 207

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6523 May 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2022/C 207/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2022/C 207/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2022/C 207/02 | Case C-132/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — BN, DM, EN v Getin Noble Bank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ — Article 19(1) TEU — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection — Principle of judicial independence — Tribunal previously established by law — Judicial body, a member of which was appointed for the first time to the position of judge by a political body within the executive branch of an undemocratic regime — Way in which the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) operates — Unconstitutionality of the law on the basis of which that council was composed — Whether that body is to be considered to be an impartial and independent court or tribunal within the meaning of EU law) | 2 |
| 2022/C 207/03 | Case C-139/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 31 March 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation of energy products used by energy-intensive businesses — Directive 2003/96/EC — Article 17(1)(b) and (4) — Businesses covered by the EU Emissions Trading System — Exemption from excise duty) | 3 |
| 2022/C 207/04 | Case C-472/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. v PN (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms — Loan contracts — Loan denominated in a foreign currency and repayable in the national currency — Contractual term placing the foreign exchange risk on the consumer — Unfairness of a term relating to the main subject matter of the contract — Effects — Invalidity of the contract — Serious damage to the consumer — Effectiveness of Directive 93/13 — Non-binding opinion of the supreme court — Possibility of restoring the parties to the situation they would have been in if that contract had not been concluded) | 3 |
| 2022/C 207/05 | Case C-687/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2002/49/EC — Assessment and management of environmental noise — Agglomerations, major roads and major railways — Article 7(2) — Strategic noise maps — Article 8(2) — Action plans — Article 10(2) — Annex VI — Information provided by the strategic noise maps — Summaries of action plans — Failure to communicate to the European Commission within the periods prescribed) | 4 |
| 2022/C 207/06 | Case C-96/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen — Germany) — DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Right of withdrawal for distance and off-premises contracts — Exceptions to the right of withdrawal — Article 16(l) — Provision of services related to leisure activities — Contract providing for a specific date or period of performance — Provision of ticket agency services — Intermediary acting in its name but on behalf of the organiser of a leisure activity — Risk associated with the exercise of the right of withdrawal) | 5 |
| 2022/C 207/07 | Case C-195/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit — Bulgaria) — LB v Smetna palata na Republika Bulgaria (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Applicability to a purely internal situation — Article 58(1) and (4) — Selection criteria — Technical and professional ability of the tenderers — Protection of the financial interests of the European Union — Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Article 8(3) — Control measures — Possibility for national authorities protecting the financial interests of the European Union to assess differently a public procurement procedure) | 5 |
| 2022/C 207/08 | Case C-231/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — IA v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Dublin system — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Article 29(2) — Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection — Six-month time limit for transfer — Possibility of extending that time limit up to a maximum of one year in the event of imprisonment — Definition of ‘imprisonment’ — Court-authorised non-voluntary committal of the asylum seeker to a hospital psychiatric department) | 6 |
| 2022/C 207/09 | Case C-287/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — EL, CP v Ryanair DAC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Strike by cabin crew and pilots — Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 12 and 28 — Articles 12 and 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — No infringement of the workers’ freedom of assembly and association and the air carrier’s right of negotiation) | 7 |
| 2022/C 207/10 | Case C-467/21: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio de Stato — Italy) — Comune di Venezia v Telecom Italia SpA, Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA — Inwit SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Approximation of laws — Electronic communications networks and services — Restrictions on the installation of mobile phone base transceiver stations established by local authorities — Insufficient details concerning the reasons why an answer to the question referred is necessary for the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility) | 8 |
| 2022/C 207/11 | Case C-505/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège — Belgium) — FU v Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des Demandeurs d’Asile (Fedasil) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Asylum policy — Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) — Article 27 — Remedies against a transfer decision — Article 27 — Remedies against a transfer decision — No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose — Manifest inadmissibility) | 8 |
| 2022/C 207/12 | Case C-89/22: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Passengers friend GmbH v British Airways plc (Air transport — Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights — Connecting flight consisting of two legs — Significant delay to final destination on the second leg operated by a non-European airline — Compensation claim against the European airline that operated the first leg) | 9 |
| 2022/C 207/13 | Case C-305/21 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2021 by João Miguel Barata against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 3 March 2021 in Case T-723/18, Barata v Parliament | 9 |
| 2022/C 207/14 | Case C-801/21 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2021 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 October 2021 in Case T-342/20, Indo European Foods v EUIPO | 10 |
| 2022/C 207/15 | Case C-19/22 P: Appeal brought on 10 January 2022 by Sanford LP against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 10 November 2021 in Case T-443/20, Sanford v EUIPO — Avery Zweckform (Labels) | 11 |
| 2022/C 207/16 | Case C-57/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 28 January 2022 — YQ v Ředitelství silnic a dálnic ČR | 11 |
| 2022/C 207/17 | Case C-66/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 2 February 2022 — Infraestruturas de Portugal, S.A., Futrifer Indústrias Ferroviárias, S.A. v Toscca Equipamentos de Madeira, Lda. | 12 |
| 2022/C 207/18 | Case C-88/22 P: Appeal brought on 8 February 2022 by QB against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 December 2021 in Case T-71/21, QB v Commission | 13 |
| 2022/C 207/19 | Case C-101/22 P: Appeal brought on 10 February 2022 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 1 December 2021 in Case T-546/20, Sopra Steria Benelux and Unisys Belgium v Commission | 14 |
| 2022/C 207/20 | Case C-105/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 15 February 2022 — P.M. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie | 14 |
| 2022/C 207/21 | Case C-106/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 15 February 2022 — Xella Magyarország Építőanyagipari Kft. v Innovációs és Technológiai Miniszter | 15 |
| 2022/C 207/22 | Case C-107/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 February 2022 — X BV, Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane | 15 |
| 2022/C 207/23 | Case C-115/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängige Schiedskommission Wien (Austria) lodged on 17 February 2022 — E.N. | 16 |
| 2022/C 207/24 | Case C-122/22 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2022 by Dyson Ltd, Dyson Technology Ltd, Dyson Operations Pte Ltd, Dyson Manufacturing Sdn Bhd, Dyson Spain, SL, Dyson Austria GmbH, Dyson sp. z o.o., Dyson Ireland Ltd, Dyson GmbH, Dyson, Dyson Srl, Dyson Sweden AB, Dyson Denmark ApS, Dyson Finland Oy, Dyson BV against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 8 December 2021 in Case T-127/19, Dyson and Others v Commission | 17 |
| 2022/C 207/25 | Case C-132/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 25 February 2022 — BM, NP v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca | 18 |
| 2022/C 207/26 | Case C-143/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 1 March 2022 — Association Avocats pour la défense des droits des étrangers (ADDE) and Others v Ministre de l’Intérieur | 18 |
| 2022/C 207/27 | Case C-148/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Président du tribunal du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 2 March 2022 — OP v Commune d’Ans | 19 |
| 2022/C 207/28 | Case C-201/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 15 March 2022 — Kopiosto r.y. v Telia Finland Oyj | 19 |
| 2022/C 207/29 | Case C-224/22: Action brought on 29 March 2022 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union | 20 |
| | General Court |
| 2022/C 207/30 | Case T-323/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Martinair Holland v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Single and continuous infringement — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons) | 22 |
| 2022/C 207/31 | Case T-324/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — SAS Cargo Group and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Equality of arms — Article 266 TFEU — State coercion — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Duration of participation in the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Substantially limited involvement — Aggravating circumstances — Repeated infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 23 |
| 2022/C 207/32 | Case T-325/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Single and continuous infringement — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Extenuating circumstances — Anticompetitive conduct encouraged by the national authorities — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 24 |
| 2022/C 207/33 | Case T-326/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Air Canada v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Failure to send a new statement of objections — Single and continuous infringement — Withdrawal of the leniency application — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 25 |
| 2022/C 207/34 | Case T-334/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Cargolux Airlines v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Failure to send a new statement of objections — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Duration of participation in the infringement — Additional amount — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Follow-my-leader role — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 26 |
| 2022/C 207/35 | Case T-337/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Air France-KLM v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Single and continuous infringement — Attributability of unlawful conduct — Conditions for granting immunity — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Duration of participation in the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 27 |
| 2022/C 207/36 | Case T-338/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Air France v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Single and continuous infringement — Conditions for granting immunity — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Duration of the participation in the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 28 |
| 2022/C 207/37 | Case T-340/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Japan Airlines v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Article 266 TFEU — Limitation period — Rights of the defence — Non-discrimination — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Additional amount — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Substantially limited involvement — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 28 |
| 2022/C 207/38 | Case T-341/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — British Airways v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Obligation to state reasons — Article 266 TFEU — State coercion — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Duration of participation in the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 29 |
| 2022/C 207/39 | Case T-342/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Deutsche Lufthansa and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Obligation to state reasons — Effect on trade between Member States — State coercion — Single and continuous infringement) | 30 |
| 2022/C 207/40 | Case T-343/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Limitation period — State constraint — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of anticompetitive behaviour by public authorities — Substantially reduced participation — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 31 |
| 2022/C 207/41 | Case T-344/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Latam Airlines Group and Lan Cargo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Limitation period — Ne bis in idem principle — Principle of non-discrimination — Rights of the defence — State constraint — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Substantially limited participation — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 32 |
| 2022/C 207/42 | Case T-350/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Ne bis in idem principle — State coercion — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 33 |
| 2022/C 207/43 | Case T-129/19 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Necci v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Social security — JSIS — Rejection of the application for membership following a transfer of pension rights — Condition relating to a period of employment of more than three years — Article 95 of the CEOS — Article 34(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 45 TFEU) | 33 |
| 2022/C 207/44 | Case T-291/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection) | 34 |
| 2022/C 207/45 | Case T-292/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection) | 35 |
| 2022/C 207/46 | Case T-299/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — KF v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Complaint of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Decision rejecting the complaint — Error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Liability) | 36 |
| 2022/C 207/47 | Case T-720/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Perry Street Software v EUIPO — Toolstream (SCRUFFS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark SCRUFFS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001)) | 36 |
| 2022/C 207/48 | Case T-30/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO COUTURE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SO COUTURE — EU word mark SO ...? — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 37 |
| 2022/C 207/49 | Case T-35/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION — Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 38 |
| 2022/C 207/50 | Case T-36/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — PO v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/338/17 — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 1d(1) and (4) of the Staff Regulations — Reasonable accommodation — Principle of non-discrimination on the ground of disability — Directive 2000/78/EC — Obligation to state reasons — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Responsibility — Material and non-material damage) | 38 |
| 2022/C 207/51 | Case T-206/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Kalita and Haas v EUIPO — Kitzbühel Tourismus (Representation of two animals) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing two animals — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an animal — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 39 |
| 2022/C 207/52 | Case T-264/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Établissement Amra v EUIPO — eXpresio (Shape of a rebound shoe) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU three-dimensional mark — Shape of a rebound shoe — Absolute ground for refusal — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Presence of word elements — Lack of essential non-functional characteristics) | 40 |
| 2022/C 207/53 | Case T-451/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Hesse v EUIPO — Wedl & Hofmann (Testa Rossa) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Testa Rossa — Earlier EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 40 |
| 2022/C 207/54 | Case T-17/21: Order of the General Court of 22 March 2022 — Miquel y Costas & Miquel v EUIPO (Pure Hemp) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate) | 41 |
| 2022/C 207/55 | Case T-232/21: Order of the General Court of 18 March 2022 — Saure v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Correspondence of the Commission concerning the quantities and delivery times of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccines — Implied refusal of access — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate — Requests to amend the form of order sought — Lis pendens — Manifest inadmissibility) | 41 |
| 2022/C 207/56 | Case T-431/21: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2022 — UNIS v Commission (Application for annulment — Social security — Bodies entrusted with the management of statutory health insurance and old-age insurance schemes — Caisse nationale d’assurance vieillesse — Economic activity — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility) | 42 |
| 2022/C 207/57 | Case T-550/21: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2022 — Kalypso Media Group v EUIPO (COMMANDOS) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate) | 42 |
| 2022/C 207/58 | Case T-123/22: Action brought on 7 March 2022 — Ecocert India v Commission | 43 |
| 2022/C 207/59 | Case T-156/22: Action brought on 23 March 2022 — Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings v Commission | 44 |
| 2022/C 207/60 | Case T-157/22: Action brought on 22 March 2022 — Dehaen v EUIPO — National Geographic Society (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC) | 45 |
| 2022/C 207/61 | Case T-158/22: Action brought on 22 March 2022 — Dehaen v EUIPO — National Geographic Society (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC) | 46 |
| 2022/C 207/62 | Case T-160/22: Action brought on 25 March 2022 — 1906 Collins v EUIPO — Peace United (bâoli BEACH) | 47 |
| 2022/C 207/63 | Case T-163/22: Action brought on 28 March 2022 — Transformers Manufacturing Company v EUIPO — H&F (TMC TRANSFORMERS) | 47 |
| 2022/C 207/64 | Case T-167/22: Action brought on 28 March 2022 — Transformers Manufacturing Company v EUIPO — H&F (TMC TRANSFORMERS) | 48 |
| 2022/C 207/65 | Case T-168/22: Action brought on 30 March 2022 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI) | 49 |
| 2022/C 207/66 | Case T-170/22: Action brought on 31 March 2022 — Telefónica de España v Commission | 50 |
| 2022/C 207/67 | Case T-171/22: Action brought on 31 March 2022 — OR and OS v Commission | 51 |
| 2022/C 207/68 | Case T-172/22: Action brought on 31 March 2022 — Gönenç v EUIPO — Solar (termorad ‘ALUMINIUM PANEL RADIATOR’) | 52 |
| 2022/C 207/69 | Case T-174/22: Action brought on 4 April 2022 — Novartis v EUIPO — AstraZeneca (BREZTREV) | 52 |
| 2022/C 207/70 | Case T-175/22: Action brought on 4 April 2022 — Novartis v EUIPO — AstraZeneca (BREZTRI) | 53 |
| 2022/C 207/71 | Case T-178/22: Action brought on 4 April 2022 — FA World Entertainment v EUIPO (FUCKING AWESOME) | 54 |
| 2022/C 207/72 | Case T-179/22: Action brought on 5 April 2022 — Farco-Pharma v EUIPO — Infarco (FARCO) | 54 |
| 2022/C 207/73 | Case T-183/22: Action brought on 11 April 2022 — Eggers & Franke v EUIPO — E. & J. Gallo Winery (EF) | 55 |
| 2022/C 207/74 | Case T-184/22: Action brought on 12 April 2022 — Eggers & Franke v EUIPO — E. & J. Gallo Winery (E & F) | 55 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2022/C 207/02

Case C-132/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — BN, DM, EN v Getin Noble Bank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ — Article 19(1) TEU — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection — Principle of judicial independence — Tribunal previously established by law — Judicial body, a member of which was appointed for the first time to the position of judge by a political body within the executive branch of an undemocratic regime — Way in which the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) operates — Unconstitutionality of the law on the basis of which that council was composed — Whether that body is to be considered to be an impartial and independent court or tribunal within the meaning of EU law)

2

2022/C 207/03

Case C-139/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 31 March 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation of energy products used by energy-intensive businesses — Directive 2003/96/EC — Article 17(1)(b) and (4) — Businesses covered by the EU Emissions Trading System — Exemption from excise duty)

3

2022/C 207/04

Case C-472/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. v PN (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms — Loan contracts — Loan denominated in a foreign currency and repayable in the national currency — Contractual term placing the foreign exchange risk on the consumer — Unfairness of a term relating to the main subject matter of the contract — Effects — Invalidity of the contract — Serious damage to the consumer — Effectiveness of Directive 93/13 — Non-binding opinion of the supreme court — Possibility of restoring the parties to the situation they would have been in if that contract had not been concluded)

3

2022/C 207/05

Case C-687/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2002/49/EC — Assessment and management of environmental noise — Agglomerations, major roads and major railways — Article 7(2) — Strategic noise maps — Article 8(2) — Action plans — Article 10(2) — Annex VI — Information provided by the strategic noise maps — Summaries of action plans — Failure to communicate to the European Commission within the periods prescribed)

4

2022/C 207/06

Case C-96/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen — Germany) — DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Right of withdrawal for distance and off-premises contracts — Exceptions to the right of withdrawal — Article 16(l) — Provision of services related to leisure activities — Contract providing for a specific date or period of performance — Provision of ticket agency services — Intermediary acting in its name but on behalf of the organiser of a leisure activity — Risk associated with the exercise of the right of withdrawal)

5

2022/C 207/07

Case C-195/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit — Bulgaria) — LB v Smetna palata na Republika Bulgaria (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Applicability to a purely internal situation — Article 58(1) and (4) — Selection criteria — Technical and professional ability of the tenderers — Protection of the financial interests of the European Union — Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Article 8(3) — Control measures — Possibility for national authorities protecting the financial interests of the European Union to assess differently a public procurement procedure)

5

2022/C 207/08

Case C-231/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — IA v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Dublin system — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Article 29(2) — Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection — Six-month time limit for transfer — Possibility of extending that time limit up to a maximum of one year in the event of imprisonment — Definition of ‘imprisonment’ — Court-authorised non-voluntary committal of the asylum seeker to a hospital psychiatric department)

6

2022/C 207/09

Case C-287/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — EL, CP v Ryanair DAC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Strike by cabin crew and pilots — Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 12 and 28 — Articles 12 and 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — No infringement of the workers’ freedom of assembly and association and the air carrier’s right of negotiation)

7

2022/C 207/10

Case C-467/21: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio de Stato — Italy) — Comune di Venezia v Telecom Italia SpA, Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA — Inwit SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Approximation of laws — Electronic communications networks and services — Restrictions on the installation of mobile phone base transceiver stations established by local authorities — Insufficient details concerning the reasons why an answer to the question referred is necessary for the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility)

8

2022/C 207/11

Case C-505/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège — Belgium) — FU v Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des Demandeurs d’Asile (Fedasil) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Asylum policy — Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) — Article 27 — Remedies against a transfer decision — Article 27 — Remedies against a transfer decision — No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose — Manifest inadmissibility)

8

2022/C 207/12

Case C-89/22: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Passengers friend GmbH v British Airways plc (Air transport — Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights — Connecting flight consisting of two legs — Significant delay to final destination on the second leg operated by a non-European airline — Compensation claim against the European airline that operated the first leg)

9

2022/C 207/13

Case C-305/21 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2021 by João Miguel Barata against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 3 March 2021 in Case T-723/18, Barata v Parliament

9

2022/C 207/14

Case C-801/21 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2021 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 October 2021 in Case T-342/20, Indo European Foods v EUIPO

10

2022/C 207/15

Case C-19/22 P: Appeal brought on 10 January 2022 by Sanford LP against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 10 November 2021 in Case T-443/20, Sanford v EUIPO — Avery Zweckform (Labels)

11

2022/C 207/16

Case C-57/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 28 January 2022 — YQ v Ředitelství silnic a dálnic ČR

11

2022/C 207/17

Case C-66/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 2 February 2022 — Infraestruturas de Portugal, S.A., Futrifer Indústrias Ferroviárias, S.A. v Toscca Equipamentos de Madeira, Lda.

12

2022/C 207/18

Case C-88/22 P: Appeal brought on 8 February 2022 by QB against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 December 2021 in Case T-71/21, QB v Commission

13

2022/C 207/19

Case C-101/22 P: Appeal brought on 10 February 2022 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 1 December 2021 in Case T-546/20, Sopra Steria Benelux and Unisys Belgium v Commission

14

2022/C 207/20

Case C-105/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 15 February 2022 — P.M. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie

14

2022/C 207/21

Case C-106/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 15 February 2022 — Xella Magyarország Építőanyagipari Kft. v Innovációs és Technológiai Miniszter

15

2022/C 207/22

Case C-107/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 February 2022 — X BV, Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane

15

2022/C 207/23

Case C-115/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängige Schiedskommission Wien (Austria) lodged on 17 February 2022 — E.N.

16

2022/C 207/24

Case C-122/22 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2022 by Dyson Ltd, Dyson Technology Ltd, Dyson Operations Pte Ltd, Dyson Manufacturing Sdn Bhd, Dyson Spain, SL, Dyson Austria GmbH, Dyson sp. z o.o., Dyson Ireland Ltd, Dyson GmbH, Dyson, Dyson Srl, Dyson Sweden AB, Dyson Denmark ApS, Dyson Finland Oy, Dyson BV against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 8 December 2021 in Case T-127/19, Dyson and Others v Commission

17

2022/C 207/25

Case C-132/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 25 February 2022 — BM, NP v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca

18

2022/C 207/26

Case C-143/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 1 March 2022 — Association Avocats pour la défense des droits des étrangers (ADDE) and Others v Ministre de l’Intérieur

18

2022/C 207/27

Case C-148/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Président du tribunal du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 2 March 2022 — OP v Commune d’Ans

19

2022/C 207/28

Case C-201/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 15 March 2022 — Kopiosto r.y. v Telia Finland Oyj

19

2022/C 207/29

Case C-224/22: Action brought on 29 March 2022 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union

20

General Court

2022/C 207/30

Case T-323/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Martinair Holland v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Single and continuous infringement — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons)

22

2022/C 207/31

Case T-324/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — SAS Cargo Group and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Equality of arms — Article 266 TFEU — State coercion — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Duration of participation in the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Substantially limited involvement — Aggravating circumstances — Repeated infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction)

23

2022/C 207/32

Case T-325/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Single and continuous infringement — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Extenuating circumstances — Anticompetitive conduct encouraged by the national authorities — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction)

24

2022/C 207/33

Case T-326/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Air Canada v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Failure to send a new statement of objections — Single and continuous infringement — Withdrawal of the leniency application — Unlimited jurisdiction)

25

2022/C 207/34

Case T-334/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Cargolux Airlines v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Failure to send a new statement of objections — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Duration of participation in the infringement — Additional amount — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Follow-my-leader role — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction)

26

2022/C 207/35

Case T-337/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Air France-KLM v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Single and continuous infringement — Attributability of unlawful conduct — Conditions for granting immunity — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Duration of participation in the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction)

27

2022/C 207/36

Case T-338/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Air France v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Single and continuous infringement — Conditions for granting immunity — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Duration of the participation in the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction)

28

2022/C 207/37

Case T-340/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Japan Airlines v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Article 266 TFEU — Limitation period — Rights of the defence — Non-discrimination — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Additional amount — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Substantially limited involvement — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction)

28

2022/C 207/38

Case T-341/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — British Airways v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Obligation to state reasons — Article 266 TFEU — State coercion — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Duration of participation in the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Unlimited jurisdiction)

29

2022/C 207/39

Case T-342/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Deutsche Lufthansa and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Obligation to state reasons — Effect on trade between Member States — State coercion — Single and continuous infringement)

30

2022/C 207/40

Case T-343/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Limitation period — State constraint — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of anticompetitive behaviour by public authorities — Substantially reduced participation — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction)

31

2022/C 207/41

Case T-344/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Latam Airlines Group and Lan Cargo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Limitation period — Ne bis in idem principle — Principle of non-discrimination — Rights of the defence — State constraint — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Substantially limited participation — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction)

32

2022/C 207/42

Case T-350/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Ne bis in idem principle — State coercion — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction)

33

2022/C 207/43

Case T-129/19 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Necci v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Social security — JSIS — Rejection of the application for membership following a transfer of pension rights — Condition relating to a period of employment of more than three years — Article 95 of the CEOS — Article 34(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 45 TFEU)

33

2022/C 207/44

Case T-291/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

34

2022/C 207/45

Case T-292/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

35

2022/C 207/46

Case T-299/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — KF v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Complaint of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Decision rejecting the complaint — Error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Liability)

36

2022/C 207/47

Case T-720/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Perry Street Software v EUIPO — Toolstream (SCRUFFS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark SCRUFFS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))

36

2022/C 207/48

Case T-30/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO COUTURE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SO COUTURE — EU word mark SO ...? — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

37

2022/C 207/49

Case T-35/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION — Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

38

2022/C 207/50

Case T-36/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — PO v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/338/17 — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 1d(1) and (4) of the Staff Regulations — Reasonable accommodation — Principle of non-discrimination on the ground of disability — Directive 2000/78/EC — Obligation to state reasons — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Responsibility — Material and non-material damage)

38

2022/C 207/51

Case T-206/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Kalita and Haas v EUIPO — Kitzbühel Tourismus (Representation of two animals) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing two animals — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an animal — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

39

2022/C 207/52

Case T-264/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Établissement Amra v EUIPO — eXpresio (Shape of a rebound shoe) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU three-dimensional mark — Shape of a rebound shoe — Absolute ground for refusal — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Presence of word elements — Lack of essential non-functional characteristics)

40

2022/C 207/53

Case T-451/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Hesse v EUIPO — Wedl & Hofmann (Testa Rossa) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Testa Rossa — Earlier EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

40

2022/C 207/54

Case T-17/21: Order of the General Court of 22 March 2022 — Miquel y Costas & Miquel v EUIPO (Pure Hemp) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

41

2022/C 207/55

Case T-232/21: Order of the General Court of 18 March 2022 — Saure v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Correspondence of the Commission concerning the quantities and delivery times of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccines — Implied refusal of access — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate — Requests to amend the form of order sought — Lis pendens — Manifest inadmissibility)

41

2022/C 207/56

Case T-431/21: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2022 — UNIS v Commission (Application for annulment — Social security — Bodies entrusted with the management of statutory health insurance and old-age insurance schemes — Caisse nationale d’assurance vieillesse — Economic activity — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)

42

2022/C 207/57

Case T-550/21: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2022 — Kalypso Media Group v EUIPO (COMMANDOS) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

42

2022/C 207/58

Case T-123/22: Action brought on 7 March 2022 — Ecocert India v Commission

43

2022/C 207/59

Case T-156/22: Action brought on 23 March 2022 — Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings v Commission

44

2022/C 207/60

Case T-157/22: Action brought on 22 March 2022 — Dehaen v EUIPO — National Geographic Society (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC)

45

2022/C 207/61

Case T-158/22: Action brought on 22 March 2022 — Dehaen v EUIPO — National Geographic Society (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC)

46

2022/C 207/62

Case T-160/22: Action brought on 25 March 2022 — 1906 Collins v EUIPO — Peace United (bâoli BEACH)

47

2022/C 207/63

Case T-163/22: Action brought on 28 March 2022 — Transformers Manufacturing Company v EUIPO — H&F (TMC TRANSFORMERS)

47

2022/C 207/64

Case T-167/22: Action brought on 28 March 2022 — Transformers Manufacturing Company v EUIPO — H&F (TMC TRANSFORMERS)

48

2022/C 207/65

Case T-168/22: Action brought on 30 March 2022 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI)

49

2022/C 207/66

Case T-170/22: Action brought on 31 March 2022 — Telefónica de España v Commission

50

2022/C 207/67

Case T-171/22: Action brought on 31 March 2022 — OR and OS v Commission

51

2022/C 207/68

Case T-172/22: Action brought on 31 March 2022 — Gönenç v EUIPO — Solar (termorad ‘ALUMINIUM PANEL RADIATOR’)

52

2022/C 207/69

Case T-174/22: Action brought on 4 April 2022 — Novartis v EUIPO — AstraZeneca (BREZTREV)

52

2022/C 207/70

Case T-175/22: Action brought on 4 April 2022 — Novartis v EUIPO — AstraZeneca (BREZTRI)

53

2022/C 207/71

Case T-178/22: Action brought on 4 April 2022 — FA World Entertainment v EUIPO (FUCKING AWESOME)

54

2022/C 207/72

Case T-179/22: Action brought on 5 April 2022 — Farco-Pharma v EUIPO — Infarco (FARCO)

54

2022/C 207/73

Case T-183/22: Action brought on 11 April 2022 — Eggers & Franke v EUIPO — E. & J. Gallo Winery (EF)

55

2022/C 207/74

Case T-184/22: Action brought on 12 April 2022 — Eggers & Franke v EUIPO — E. & J. Gallo Winery (E & F)

55

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN