alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form S-8
No. 2-68366, Form S-8 No. 333-19325, Form S-8 No. 33-27866, Form S-8 No.
33-60725, Form S-8 No. 333-13751, Form S-8 No. 33-60727, Form S-8 No. 333-56947,
Form S-8 No. 333-70239, Form S-8 No. 333-104611, Form S-3 No. 33-46325, Form S-3
No. 33-52121, Form S-3 No. 333-68211, Form S-3 No. 333-84292-01, Form S-3 No.
333-110760 and Form S-3 No. 333-136563-01) of American Airlines, Inc., and in
the related Prospectuses, of our reports dated February 18, 2009, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of American Airlines and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of American
Airlines,  included in this Annual Report (Form  10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2008.








/s/  ERNST
& YOUNG LLP











Dallas,
Texas


February
18, 2009
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT

EM IR SEHIC ,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,

v. W ILLIAM VAN ANDER SON a nd M AYUKA S. ANDER SON,

De fe nda n ts-Appe lle e s. No. 13-17205 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-03030-DAD

M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Sta t e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Da le A. Droz d, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d August 16, 2016 ** Sa n Fra n c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : THOM AS, C hie f Judge , a nd HAW KINS a n d M c KEOW N, C i rc uit Judge s. Em ir Se hic a

ppe a l s the distric t c ourt’ s orde r dism issing h is a c tion a nd de ny ing his m otion to withdra

w from a n ora l s e ttle m e nt ag r eem e n t. W e re vie w the distric t 

# FIL ED
AUG 18 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U

. S

. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not ap p r o pr i at e f o r pu b l i cat i o n an d i s not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.
** T h e p a n e l u n a n i mo u s l y c o n c l u d e s t h i s c a s e i s s u i t a b l e f o r d e c i s i o n without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).c ourt’ s de c i sion to e nforc e the se ttle m e nt a gre e m e nt for a n a buse of disc re tion, W

ilc ox
v . Arpaio , 753 F.3d 872, 875 (9th C ir. 2014), a nd we a ffirm

. The distric t c o urt did n ot a buse its disc re tion by e nforc ing the te rm s of the ora l

se ttle m e nt a g re e m e nt the pa rtie s re a c he d on M a y 24, 2013. T he a gre e m en t wa s
c om ple t e a nd unc om

p l ic a te d , a nd both pa

rtie s a c knowle dge d the ir a gre e m e nt t o the te rm s on the re c ord. A fte r re a c hing the a gre e m e nt, the pa rtie s c a m e “ i nto ope n c ourt
a nd a nnounc e d tha t the re wa s a se ttle m e nt. The se ttle m e nt c onta ine d a gre e m e nt a s to
a ll m a te ria l te rm s, whic h te rm s we re put on the re c o rd.” Doi v . Hale k ulani C orp. , 276 F.3d 1131, 1137-39 (9th C ir. 2002) (e n forc ing a sim ila r o r al a gre e m e nt m a de of

re c o rd in ope n c ourt). The re wa s no ne e d t o hold a n e vide ntia ry he a ring to de te rm ine if the re wa s a co m

p le te a gre e m e nt or m e e ting of the m inds, be c a use the pa

rtie s h a d

a lre a dy a c knowle dge d

a s m uc h in ope n c ourt. Se e id. 1 AFFIRM E D
.

1 The d istric t c ourt a lso re ta ine d jurisdic tion to e nforc e the te rm s of the pa rtie s’ a gre e m e nt, a nd a

ny dispute s a

bout ongoing c om

plia nc e w i th the a gre e m e nt m a y be dire c te d to tha

t c ourt. 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7704
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES EDWARD RANCHER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-268, CA-96-31-5) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Edward Rancher, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rancher , Nos. CR-89-268; CA-96-31-5 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 69 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 69

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2017

  Ms. Norton submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On October 6, 2017, or on such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration 
of the Senate may jointly designate, the 32d annual District of 
Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds to 
carry the Special Olympics torch to honor local Special Olympics 
athletes.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6138

ALBERT TYRONE JOHNSON, 

Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of 

Corrections, 

Respondent - Appellee. 

No. 11-6403

ALBERT TYRONE JOHNSON, 

Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of 

Corrections, 

Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior 

District Judge. (1:09-cv-01297-CMH-IDD) 

Submitted: November 10, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Albert Tyrone Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
3

PER CURIAM: 

In these consolidated appeals, Albert Tyrone Johnson

seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition (No. 11-6138) and its order 

denying leave to appeal in forma pauperis in appeal No. 11-6138

(No. 11-6403). In No. 11-6138, the district court’s order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal in No. 11-6138. 
4

Turning to appeal No. 11-6403, the denial of in forma 

pauperis status is immediately appealable. Roberts v. U.S. 

Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950) (per curiam). Because this 

court granted Johnson leave to appeal in forma pauperis in No. 

11-6138, we dismiss the appeal in No. 11-6403 as moot. 

See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir. 2007) 

(setting forth the principles of appellate mootness). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1012 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1012

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar 
 limitation on employer-provided group term life insurance that can be 
            excluded from the gross income of the employee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2017

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar 
 limitation on employer-provided group term life insurance that can be 
            excluded from the gross income of the employee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Group Term Life Insurance Increase 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED GROUP 
              TERM LIFE INSURANCE PURCHASED FOR EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 79(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``$50,000'' and inserting ``$375,000''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Section 79 of such Code is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Inflation Adjustment.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of any taxable year 
        beginning after 2018, the $375,000 amount under subsection 
        (a)(1) shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `2017' for `1992' in subparagraph (B) thereof.
            ``(2) Rounding.--If any amount as adjusted under paragraph 
        (1) is not a multiple of $10,000, such amount shall be rounded 
        to the nearest multiple of $10,000.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT JULY 31, 1997 AND THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         127,807
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,128
<PP&E>                                       1,851,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                 702,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,966,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          125,982
<BONDS>                                      1,513,932
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     244,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,966,149
<SALES>                                        123,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               657,449
<CGS>                                           47,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              69,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                452,780
<INCOME-TAX>                                   172,483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            280,297
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (156,539)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   123,758
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   13,749
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 91382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26943]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: CP25-16-000.
    Applicants: Golden Pass Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Golden Pass Pipeline LLC submits Abbreviated 
Application to Amend Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity 
previously granted to construct, own and operate jurisdictional 
facilities et al. located in Sabine Pass, Texas.
    Filed Date: 11/7/24.
    Accession Number: 20241107-5157.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/29/24.

    Docket Numbers: RP25-181-000.
    Applicants: EQT Energy, LLC, Equinor Natural Gas LLC.
    Description: Joint Petition for Limited Waivers of Capacity Release 
Regulations, et al. of EQT Energy, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 11/13/24.
    Accession Number: 20241113-5042.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/24.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or [email protected].

    Dated: November 13, 2024.
Carlos D. Clay,
Acting Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-26943 Filed 11-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
**Exhibit 31(i).1****CERTIFICATION**I, Raúl Alarcón, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(f)) for theregistrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 

 
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 9, 2005           /s/ Raúl Alarcón, Jr.     Name:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2382]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         TRIBUTE TO KAREN DAVIS

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. LEE TERRY

                              of nebraska

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. TERRY. Madam Speaker, I rise to honor the accomplishments of 
Karen Davis. Karen recently celebrated 10 years of service in my Omaha 
Congressional Office. She is a dedicated servant to the Second 
Congressional District of Nebraska. She works hard and deserves 
accolades.
  Karen Davis serves as Outreach Coordinator for my Omaha Congressional 
Office. Karen is the epitome of customer service. Karen has the skill 
and understanding to help seniors make sense of complex issues such as 
Medicare and Medicaid. Although at times carrying a crushing workload 
while being a working mother, she is accessible, helpful and always 
puts constituents first. Her dedication to service has touched 
thousands of individuals during her 10 years. I should also point out 
that Karen's dad was a Tuskeegee airman--a point of pride for not only 
Karen but all of us in our office.
  Karen, today I offer you a heartfelt thank you. Thank you for your 
vision, passion and understanding. You should be proud of the many 
things you have accomplished over the years. I know I am. I consider 
you a friend and I am grateful to have you on my team. Thank you.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



RELM Wireless Corporation

Melbourne, Florida



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-112446) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan (as amended) and the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-25795) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of RELM Wireless Corporation of our report dated February 23, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.





/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP



Miami, Florida

March 8, 2006