alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingSeptember 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. AltonWingate, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Harry L. Stephens, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and
(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
 
	 	 	 
Date: November 12, 2004     BY: /S/ J. Alton Wingate                    J. Alton Wingate                    President and Chief Executive                    Officer      
Date: November 12, 2004     BY: /S/ Harry L. Stephens                    Harry L. Stephens                    Executive Vice-President              and Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER WITHDRAWING MEDIATION ORDER

Appellate case name: Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services v. Carol Mersch

Appellate case number: 01-13-00021-CV

Date motion filed: February 7, 2013

Type of Motion: Objection to Mediation

Party filing motion: Appellee

Trial court case number: 26248

Trial court: 344th District Court of Chambers County

It is ORDERED that Appellee’s objection to mediation is granted. We withdraw 

our Mediation Order dated January 29, 2013.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

x Acting individually 

Date: February 13, 2013 i

 

i

Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for 

motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Note: Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice 

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion 

for rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.4(a).
# Official Journal L 2/5 Ja

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 495 January 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 2

English edition

Legislation

Volume 495 January 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 3/2006 of 4 January 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 4/2006 of 4 January 2006 laying down the reduction coefficient to be applied under tariff subquota III for common wheat of a quality other than high quality opened by Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 | 3 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 3/2006 of 4 January 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 4/2006 of 4 January 2006 laying down the reduction coefficient to be applied under tariff subquota III for common wheat of a quality other than high quality opened by Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002

3

| | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | Council Decision of 21 December 2005 amending Decision 2004/465/EC on a Community financial contribution towards Member States fisheries control programmes | 4 |

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

Council

*

Council Decision of 21 December 2005 amending Decision 2004/465/EC on a Community financial contribution towards Member States fisheries control programmes

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2339]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   HONORING ASSISTANT DEAN EVE KLOTHEN, RECIPIENT OF THE 2009 FATHER 
                          ROBERT DRINAN AWARD

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. ROBERT E. ANDREWS

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                       Tuesday, December 9, 2008

  Mr. ANDREWS. Madam Speaker, I rise today to honor Assistant Dean Eve 
Klothen for receiving the 2009 Father Robert Drinan Award. This 
prestigious award is given by the American Association of Law Schools 
in recognition of outstanding contributions to pro bono activities and 
public service.
  Assistant Dean Klothen's distinguished career has included service as 
a legal services lawyer in Georgia, director of the Philadelphia 
Volunteers for the Indigent Program, and director of the Philadelphia 
Bar Foundation. During Assistant Dean Klothen's service in these 
positions, she has successfully created programs to help the less 
fortunate while also mentoring students and young professionals. 
Assistant Dean Klothen has worked tirelessly over the course of her 
career to instill the values of public service and expand opportunities 
for students to participate in pro bono activities. During Assistant 
Dean Klothen's tenure at Rutgers Law School, she has been central to 
efforts to create a number of programs, including the Pro Bono Research 
Project, new pro bono projects in areas such as tax assistance and 
immigration, and leadership training for students at nearby law 
schools.
  Assistant Dean Klothen's record of serving low income clients in 
south Jersey and Philadelphia is exceptional. This reputation, along 
with her remarkable leadership in advising the next generation of 
outstanding legal minds, clearly demonstrates why Assistant Dean 
Klothen is very deserving of the 2009 Father Robert Drinan award.
  Madam Speaker, I congratulate Assistant Dean Klothen on this 
achievement and wish her the best of luck in future endeavors.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6221
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HARVEY WILSON MILLER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-106-R, CA-97-202-R) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harvey Wilson Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Miller , Nos. CR-94-106-R; CA-97-202-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 46 

Expressing support for the designation of a ‘‘National Purebred Dog Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2017 

Mr. YOHO (for himself, Mr. SCHRADER, and Mr. ABRAHAM) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of a ‘‘National 

Purebred Dog Day’’. 

Whereas there is currently no day set aside to celebrate and 

acknowledge the contributions of the purebred dog, and 

we wish to designate a day to expressly recognize those 

contributions; 

Whereas purebred dogs are living legacies of the cultures that 

created them, and historically these dogs worked alongside their people and provided them companionship; 

Whereas today, the service of these breeds continues as they 

work alongside humans and provide inestimable companionship while serving as guide dogs, service dogs, conservation dogs, livestock guardians, search and rescue 

dogs, earth dogs, police dogs, canine soldiers serving by 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 46 IH 

the sides of our military men and women, and ultimately 

guardians of family, home, and hearth; 

Whereas purebred dogs have been of enormous help to medical science, serving as models for many heritable human 

diseases, playing a role in humanity’s understanding of 

the human and canine genomes, and benefiting pharmaceutical research and development; 

Whereas purebred dogs are working dogs, serving as avalanche dogs, trackers and trailers, herders, controllers of 

vermin, water rescuers, carting and sled dogs, retrievers, 

protectors, hunters, and bird dogs, and always they are 

the heartbeat of a companion near and dear to humans; 

Whereas all dogs should be valued, whatever their ancestry, 

but the purpose-bred dog and the predictability of its 

breed should be cherished and preserved; and 

Whereas each breed is indelibly etched in the history of the 

culture that created it just as surely as that culture’s 

music, art, and language: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress supports the designation of a 

3 ‘‘National Purebred Dog Day’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf Frankfurt Houston London Los Angeles Miami Milan

Munich New York Orange County Paris Rome Seoul Silicon Valley Washington, D.C.

Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices (Shanghai)

U.S. practice conducted through McDermott Will & Emery LLP.

Arthur G. Sapper

Attorney at Law

asapper@mwe.com

202.756.8246

500 North Capitol Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20001-1531

Facsimile: 202.756.8087

www.mwe.com

 November 4, 2013

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL (washoshrccommission@oshrc.gov)

The Honorable Ray H. Darling, Jr., Executive Secretary

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Re: Kiewit Power Constructors Co., OSHRC Docket No. 11-2395

Dear Mr. Darling:

KPCC respectfully submits the following regarding the Secretary’s reply to its 

citation of additional authorities: Contrary to the Secretary’s principal argument that the

authorities are “inapplicable because they concern...retroactiv[ity],” at least one (LedezmaGalicia v. Holder, 636 F.3d 1059, 1067, 1075 (9th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 1170 (2009))

concerns implied repeal—thus showing that the principle of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 

320 n.45 (2001), applies to any matter required to be clear.

Please distribute this letter to the Commission and the General Counsel, and 

electronically acknowledge receipt to asapper@mwe.com.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Arthur G. Sapper

cc: Messrs. Glabman and Joseph (electronic service certified this date)
#### Merrit *v.*Merrit, and Brehon *v.*Tuton’s Adm’r.

Plaintiffs in these respective suits hsflWfcovcrcd judgments, and executions having been issued against the Defendants respectively, *milla bona*were returned : and thereupon in the latter of these causes, the clerk had issued execution for Plaintiffs costs, against the Plaintiff himself: and the propriety of this measure being moved to the Court, they said unanimously, that the Plaintiff is liable for his own costs where the Defendant is insolvent, and that the Clerk was justifiable in what he had done.

The original note of this case is without date, and perhaps it may be misplaced in point of time.

Note. — Vide *Superior Caurt Office*v. Lockman, 1 *Dev. Rep.*146.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 632 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-280, K2025-278.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26549 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant, 

v. OSHRC Docket No. 18-0242 

ONEKEY, LLC, 

Respondent.

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief the following issues: 

(1) With respect to Willful Citation 2, Item 1, whether the judge erred in imputing the 

knowledge of Respondent’s supervisors given relevant precedent from the U.S. Court 

of Appeals for the circuit in which the company is headquartered. See 29 U.S.C. 

§ 660(a) (employer may appeal to circuit where violation is alleged to have occurred, 

employer has its principal office, or D.C. Circuit); Pa. Power & Light Co. v. OSHRC, 

737 F.2d 350 (3d Cir. 1984) (“[I]n a case where the inference of employer knowledge 

is raised only by proof of a supervisor’s misconduct,” that misconduct “will not, 

standing alone, end the inquiry into foreseeability.”). 

(2) With respect to Willful Citation 2, Item 2, whether the judge erred in concluding that 

the Secretary established Respondent’s knowledge of the cited hazard. See Burford’s 

Tree, Inc., 22 BNA OSHC 1948, 1950 (No. 07-1899, 2010) (“To establish a violation 

of the general duty clause, the Secretary must prove, in addition to the four elements 

not in dispute here, that the employer knew or, with the exercise of reasonable 

diligence, could have known of the hazardous condition.”). 

(3) With respect to Willful Citation 2, Items 1 and 2, whether the judge erred in affirming

the violations as willful. 

The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider either the merits 

or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 
2

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission

in accordance with Commission Rule 93. The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed 

in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service.

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: February 18, 2021 /s/ 

 John X. Cerveny 

 Executive Secretary

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, 

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. 

Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
# Official Journal L 120/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.120.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 120 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5313 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.120.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 120

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5313 May 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 11 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to door latches and door retention components | 1 |
| | * | Regulation No 18 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to their protection against unauthorized use | 29 |
| | * | Regulation No 39 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the speedometer equipment including its installation | 40 |
| | * | Regulation No 73 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of goods vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers with regard to their lateral protection | 49 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 11 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to door latches and door retention components

1

*

Regulation No 18 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to their protection against unauthorized use

29

*

Regulation No 39 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the speedometer equipment including its installation

40

*

Regulation No 73 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of goods vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers with regard to their lateral protection

49

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

I, Robert B. Barnhill,Jr., Chief Executive Officer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated, (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

# 1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the period ended December 24, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

# 2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: February 7, 2007 |   |   |   | /s/ Robert B. Barnhill, Jr. |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                   |   |   |   | Robert B. Barnhill, Jr.     |

##  

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

##  

----