alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   8-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          19,542
<SECURITIES>                                     7,841
<RECEIVABLES>                                  264,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,193)
<INVENTORY>                                    313,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               644,479
<PP&E>                                         594,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                (78,303)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,183,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          474,458
<BONDS>                                      1,253,020
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          133,959
<PREFERRED>                                        427
<COMMON>                                         2,166
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,183,629
<SALES>                                      1,370,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,370,385
<CGS>                                        1,116,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,116,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,778
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,959
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (21,746)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,007
<DISCONTINUED>                                  35,369
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (990)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,386
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.79


</TABLE>
FEDERAL REGISTER: 58 FR 8655 (February 16, 1993)

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM)

30 CFR Parts 701 and 785

Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations; Permanent Regulatory Program;

Definitions; Requirements for Permits and Permit Processing

ACTION: Correction 

In rule document 93-388 beginning on page 3466 in the issue of Friday, January 8, 1993, make the following corrections: 

 1. On page 3466, in the second column, in the second full paragraph, beginning in the ninth line, "In Re: Permanent 

Surface Mining Regulation Litigation (II)" should be italicized. 

 2. On the same page, in the same column, in the fourth full paragraph, in the sixth line from the end, after "could be" 

delete "in". 

 3. On page 3468, in the 3d column, in the 1st full paragraph, in the 13th line from the end, "all" should be italicized. 

 4. On page 3469, in the first column, in the last full paragraph, in the sixth line from the end, "NMF v. Lujan" should 

read "NWF v. Lujan". 

 5. On the same page, in the second column, in the seventh line from the top of the page, "weigh in factor" should read 

"weigh in favor". 

 6. On page 3470, in the second column, in the first paragraph, in the last line, "programs." should read "program." 

 Sec. 785.10 [Corrected] 

 7. On page 3470, in the third column, in Sec. 785.10, in the third line, after "and (h)" insert a comma. 

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
----

Information procedure — Technical rules

(2005/C 117/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services. (OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37; OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18).

Notifications of draft national technical rules received by the Commission

The Commission draws attention to the judgement delivered on 30 April 1996 in the ‘CIA Security’ case (C-194/94 — ECR I, p. 2201), in which the Court of Justice ruled that Articles 8 and 9 of Directive 98/34/EC (formerly 83/189/EEC) are to be interpreted as meaning that individuals may rely on them before national courts which must decline to apply a national technical regulation which has not been notified in accordance with the Directive.

This judgement confirms the Commission's communication of 1 October 1986 (OJ C 245, 1.10.1986, p. 4).

Accordingly, breach of the obligation to notify renders the technical regulations concerned inapplicable, and consequently unenforceable against individuals.

For more information on the notification procedure, please write to:

Also consult the website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/

If you require any further information on these notifications, please contact the national departments listed below:

LIST OF NATIONAL DEPARTMENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DIRECTIVE 98/34/EC

BELGIUM

CZECH REPUBLIC

DENMARK

GERMANY

ESTONIA

GREECE

SPAIN

FRANCE

IRELAND

ITALY

CYPRUS

LATVIA

LITHUANIA

LUXEMBOURG

HUNGARY

MALTA

NETHERLANDS

AUSTRIA

POLAND

PORTUGAL

SLOVENIA

SLOVAKIA

FINLAND

SWEDEN

UNITED KINGDOM

EFTA - ESA

TURKEY

----

(1)  Year - registration number - Member State of origin.

(2)  Period during which the draft may not be adopted.

(3)  No standstill period since the Commission accepts the grounds of urgent adoption invoked by the notifying Member State.

(4)  No standstill period since the measure concerns technical specifications or other requirements or rules on services linked to fiscal or financial measures, pursuant to the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC.

(5)  Information procedure closed.

----
Regional Fact Sheet - Interior Regions 3, 4 & 6

Mid-Continent Region

General Information

The Mid-Continent Region has oversight jurisdiction for 40% of all coal producing states and 

regulatory jurisdiction on Tribal lands in Oklahoma.

Regional Office:

Alton, IL

• Regional Director’s Office

• Program Services & Grants

Division

• Technical Support Division

Field Offices: 

Alton, IL

• Serves IA, IL, IN, & MO

Birmingham, AL

• Serves AL, LA, & MS

• Director – Richard O’Dell

Tulsa, Oklahoma 

• Serves AR, KS, TX, and Cherokee,

Choctaw and Muscogee (Creek)

Tribes

• Director – Joe Maki

Recent Regional Awards 

AML Awards

• Interior States Award (2022) –

Indiana AML Site 2084, Surprise

Pit

• Small Project Award (2022) –

Texas AML Project TX000056

• Interior States Award (2023) –

Patrick AML Reclamation Project

Regional Initiatives 

 Implementing the Bipartisan

Infrastructure Law.

 Meeting with Cherokee, Choctaw

and Muscogee Tribal Nations to

discuss the availability of regulatory

programs, developing grants and

training opportunities.

 Reporting on Abandoned Mine

Lands Economic Redevelopment

(AMLER) projects in Alabama.

 Staff training on new Reigl V-2000i

Terrestrial LiDAR scanner to map

open pit mining.

At a Glance

2022 coal production: 90.8 million short 

tons

# of active mines: 43

Site visits & inspections conducted 

(2022): 255

FY23 Title V grants: $9.4 million

FY23 Title IV grants: $27.5 million

FY23 AMLER grants: $11.7 million

Source: OSMRE Greenbook, U.S. Energy Information Administration, 

OSMRE I&E database

CONTACTS

Regional Director: 

William L. Joseph 

bjoseph@osmre.gov

Senior Program Specialist:

Joy E. Schieferstein

jschieferstein@osmre.gov

Regional Office: 

William L. Beatty Building

501 Belle Street #216

Alton, IL 62002

(618) 463-6460

STATES WITH PRIMACY

AL, AR, IA, IL, IN, KS,

LA, MO, MS, TX

RESOURCES

State and Tribal Contacts

3

4

6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                        71
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,597
<PP&E>                                          36,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,880
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,513
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,799
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    460
<INCOME-TAX>                                       175
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                285
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       285
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
MAR 0 2 1550

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

FROM: Kathi Epping, EE-43

SUBJECT: Phone call with John Peltz and Peyton Glenn of Naval Facilities Engineering

Command--Atlantic Division regarding distribution transformer definition

[Docket Numbers EE-TP-98-550]

On February 19, 1999, I spoke with John Peltz and Peyton Glenn, both from the Naval Facilities

Engineering Command--Atlantic Division, concerning their interpretation of the definition of the

term "distribution transformer" as it pertains to low voltage (600 volts and below) transformers.

Mr. Peltz and Mr. Glenn both believe that low voltage transformers are not covered by the

ANSI/IEEE C57.12.80 definition of "distribution transformer". They stated that low voltage

transformers are "general purpose transformers," which are specialty transformers. They also

stated that they believe that IEEE standard 241 ("the Gray Book") is merely a guideline for

transformer installers and that ANSI/IEEE C57.12.80 standard is the authority regarding

transformer definitions.

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 24

MAR 0 2 19~9 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

FROM: Kathi Epping, EE-43 

SUBJECT: Phone call with John Peltz and Peyton Glenn of Naval Facilities Engineering 

Command--Atlantic Division regarding distribution transformer definition 

[Docket Numbers EE-TP-98-550J 

On February 19, 1999, I spoke with John Peltz and Peyton Glenn, both from the Naval Facilities 

Engineering Command--Atlantic Division, concerning their interpretation of the definition of the 

term "distribution transformer" as it pertains to low voltage (600 volts and below) transformers. 

Mr. Peltz and Mr. Glenn both believe that low voltage transformers are not covered by the 

ANSI/IEEE C57.12.80 definition of "distribution transformer". They stated that low voltage 

transformers are "general purpose transformers," which are specialty transformers. They also 

stated that they believe that IEEE standard 241 ("the Gray Book") is merely a guideline for 

transformer installers and that ANSI/IEEE C57.12.80 standard is the authority regarding 

transformer definitions.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 11.1
                        EQUITY CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In thousands, except per share data)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Three months ended       Nine months ended
                               September 30,            September 30,
                               1996        1995         1996        1995
<S>                            <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>
Computation of earnings per 
  common and equivalent share:
Net income attributable to 
  common stock................ $    2,112  $    1,188   $    6,994  $    4,304
                               ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding...     19,148      14,691       17,312      14,690
Additional shares assuming 
  conversion of stock options.        278         211          255         117
Effect of restricted stock 
  issued......................         21          --           16          --
                               ----------  ----------     --------  ----------

Weighted average shares for 
primary earnings per share....     19,447      14,902       17,583      14,807

Incremental shares issuable 
  using quarter-end market 
    price:
      Conversion of stock 
        options...............         20          36           18          54
      Effect of restricted 
        stock issued..........          2          --            2          --
                               ----------  ----------   ----------  ----------

Weighted average shares for 
  fully diluted earnings 
    per share.................     19,469      14,938       17,603      14,861
                               ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========

Primary earnings per common 
  and equivalent share........ $     0.11  $     0.08   $     0.40  $     0.29
                               ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========

Fully diluted earnings per 
  common and equivalent share. $     0.11  $     0.08   $     0.40  $     0.29
                               ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         3,396
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         815
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               13,703
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         94,933
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           91,714
<LOANS>                                        241,687
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 367,119
<DEPOSITS>                                     239,370
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            8,452
<LONG-TERM>                                    77,330
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,891
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 367,119
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                5,646
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,520
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               90
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               7,256
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,844
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,412
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,844
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  155
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                600
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     600
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   390
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 2.17
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,493
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,648
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,648
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
Alcan Corporation

Executive Company Vehicle Program

 

 

The company provides designated individuals with a company paid leased vehicle.  The executive is given an allowance that may be spent on a vehicle of the employee's choosing (Appendix A).  The executive may select a vehicle with a cost in excess of the allowance, but the excess is payable by the individual.

Lease Program

The company has a designated vehicle leasing company that obtains the vehicle and provides the following services at no cost to the individual. 

|   | Vehicle Purchase

   Maintenance Services

   Vehicle Registration

   Personal Tax Calculation

   Fuel Purchase Credit Card

   Vehicle Disposal |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Vehicle Operation

The vehicle is available for both business and personal use by the executive and his/her spouse.  Per U.S. Internal Revenue Service Regulation, the driver is required to maintain records of personal use, because a company provided vehicle is considered a taxable benefit to the employee.  The leasing company provides an automated reporting system to accommodate this process.

Vehicle Cost Exceeding Allowance

Should the executive select a vehicle in excess of the allowance, the amount above the allowance will be divided by 50 months (amortization period) and deductions taken from the employee's paycheck.

Vehicle Disposal

Company vehicles are disposed of after 36 months in service or 60,000 miles whichever comes first.  The driver is given first right to purchase the vehicle at the book value (28% of the original capitalized cost).  Should the driver decline to purchase the vehicle, the company will take responsibility for disposing of the vehicle.  Any employee deductions for leases over the allowance cease upon disposal of the vehicle.

----

APPENDIX A

 

Executive Company Vehicle Program

Allowances

| PRESIDENT, ROLLED PRODUCTS AMERICAS AND ASIA                     | $ 40,000 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
|                                                             |     |
|                                                             |     |
| JOB GRADE 43 AND ABOVE (as approved by VP, Human Resources RPAA) | $ 37,000 |
|                                                             |     |
|                                                             |     |
| JOB GRADE 42 AND BELOW (as approved by VP, Human Resources RPAA) | $ 32,000 |

Approved by: David Godsell, VP, HR - RPAA

November 7, 2000
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 

CASE NUMBER: P04-0153

RELATED CASES 

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS 

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL: 1-2 3 

KEYWORDS: AQUATOX-A,C, LUNG 

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT: 

FATE: MW184 with 48% and 52% with mp = 1400 EC (M) and needs to be a very fine 

powder based on intended use and with mean 

vp < 1.0E-6 mm Hg or torr at 25 EC (P) 

bp >> 1400 C (P) 

H < 1.0E-8 (P) 

log Koc > 4.5 (P) 

log fish BCF = 0.50 (P) 

log fish (carp) BCF for <= 1.7 (M) [ ]; 

POTW removal = 0% based on uncertainty; however, if dissociation occurs, then removal of 

PO4 has been measured by the OW = 32% (M); if dissociation does not occur, then PMN will 

act like a fine particle in the POTW and in the aquatic environment 

time for complete ultimate aerobic biodegradation is uncertain, thus > months as worst case 

sorption to soils and sediments is uncertain and depends on the degree of dissociation 

PBT Potential: P3B1T1 with B1 based on fish 

*CEB FATE: migration to ground water is uncertain and depends on the degree of dissociation 

HEALTH: Absorption nil thru skin, poor thru lung and GI tract based on physical/chemical 

properties and analogs; 

concern for lung toxicity and lung cancer if inhaled due to nature of PMN substance; 

if dissolution occurs, the concern for is low; 

low to moderate concern for toxicity; 

*CEB HEALTH: Exposures to humans: inhalation 

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are: 

fish 96-h LC50 = 0.060 P toxicity 

daphnid 48-h LC50 = 6.0 P toxicity 

green algal 96-h EC50 c = 0.060 P stimulation of growth by 

algal 96-h EC50 c = 0.310 P toxicity by ion 
fish chronic value = 0.006 P 

daphnid ChV = 0.600 P 

algal ChV = 0.020 P 

Predictions are based on SAR-nearest analog analysis for soluble compounds with MW 

adjustment and test data for inorganic with regard to eutrophication in freshwater 

environments; ; MW184; ; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and 

mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; 

high concern for toxicity from the Y 

high concern for eutrophication from the 

assessment factor = 10.0 

CC for = 0.001 mg/L (ppm) 

CC for = 0.020 mg/L (ppm) 

*CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water; 

SAT Co-chair: Vince Nabholz, 564.8909
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

p0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

144230

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144230 COA: 301608 Saginaw CC: 09-032607-FC DYTERIUS MICHAEL ROBY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 25, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.