alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       FEB-27-1999            FEB-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          MAY-31-1998            MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            AUG-29-1998            AUG-29-1998
<CASH>                                          811                    811
<SECURITIES>                                      0                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,976                  1,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0                      0
<INVENTORY>                                  60,726                 60,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             68,259                 68,259
<PP&E>                                       51,410                 51,410
<DEPRECIATION>                               29,644                 29,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               98,399                 98,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        34,827                 31,706
<BONDS>                                           0                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                       0                      0
<COMMON>                                          1                      1
<OTHER-SE>                                   28,908                 28,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 98,399                 98,399
<SALES>                                      54,190                109,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             54,190                109,205
<CGS>                                        39,190                 79,527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                14,642                 29,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (65)                  (125)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              789                  1,551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (366)                  (962)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (366)                  (962)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                      0
<CHANGES>                                         0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (366)                  (962)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.04)                 (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.04)                 (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE *vs.*WILLIAM L. WALLACE.

December 1842.

Where the jury in a special verdict do not say that they find in one way or the other, according as the opinion of the court may be upon the law, the ver-diet is

Where a special verdict is imperfect or bad, so that no judgment can be given thereon, the proper course is to direct a *venire de novo.*

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Moore county, at Fall Term, 1842, his Honor Judge Dick presiding.

The defendant was indicted for an assault and battery on Robert Dean, and pleaded not guilty. On the trial of this issue, the jury found the following special verdict. The jury find, that while the prosecutor was sitting,in a chair, the defendant raised his gun in a striking position, being within striking distance of the prosecutor, and declared, that if he repeated certain words just uttered, he would strike him, which words were not repeated by the prosecutor, and the jury submit to the court whether this is in law an assault.

The court, being of opinion that it was not in law an assault, rendered judgment for the defendant, from which, the Solicitor for the State appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Attorney General*for the State.

*D. Reid*for the defendant.

Gaston, J.

The special verdict in this case is so imperfect, that in law no judgment can be rendered thereon. The jury submit to the court, whether the defendant be guilty of *196an assault, but they do not find the defendant guilty, if in the opinion of .the court he is guilty ; and not guilty, if in the opinion of the .court he is not guilty. The finding one way or *umst*be a finding of the jury, or the verdict is bad. When a special verdict is imperfect or bad, the proper course is to direct a *venire de novo.*Cro. Jac. 113. 2 L. Ray. 1521, 1522.

Should it be thought proper to bring the case before us after another trial, .we desire that the circumstances be stated more fully than they are set forth in this verdict. The words used, which the defendant forbade to be repeated, and the intent with which he raised his gun, and whether as wielded by him it would probably have occasioned death or great bodily harm had it descended on the prosecutor, are all matters proper to be noticed,

We have had occasion j.n the case .of the *State*v *Morgan, (supra,*p. 186) to give our views of the law on questions supposed .to be involved in this case, a.nd therefore our inability to render judgment in this case will probably not cause any serious .disappointment to those interested therein.

This opinion must be certified to the Superior Court of Moore, with instructions to set aside the verdict, and issue a *venire de novo.*

Per Curiam. Ordered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H55]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Kirk) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  (Mr. KIRK addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.)

                          ____________________
```
#### Calvert, Respondent, vs. City of Appleton, Appellant.

*March 9*

June *18, 1928.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Alfred C. Bosser*of Appleton, and for the respondent on that of *Bradford & Bradford*of Appleton.

The following opinion was filed April 3, 1928:

Doerfler, J.

The parties to this action have stipulated that the decision in this case may abide by the decision in *Calvert v. City of Appleton, ante,*p. 235, 219 N. W. 102.

*By the Court.*— The order of the circuit court overruling the demurrer is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings according to law

A motion for a rehearing was denied on June 18, 1928.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E46]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              THE TURNABOUT RANCH IN GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JIM MATHESON

                                of utah

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, January 8, 2009

  Mr. MATHESON. Madam Speaker, I rise today to introduce legislation 
that would correct a drafting error that involves a 25-acre parcel of 
Bureau of Land Management, BLM, land, and land that is part of the 
Turn-About Ranch, which rehabilitates troubled youth.
  An erroneous survey in January 1999 was the cause of this trespass 
conflict when Congress approved a major land exchange, P.L. 105-335, 
between the State of Utah and the border of the Grand Staircase 
Escalante, GSE, Monument. This legislation makes a minor boundary 
change to resolve the trespass conflict. It would grant the owners of 
the ranch to purchase the erroneously surveyed land at a fair market 
value, enabling this important and effective program for troublesome 
youth to continue unimpeded.
  The Turn-About Ranch has graduated approximately 500 troubled and at 
risk teenagers through an intense program of training and 
rehabilitation. The ranch also employs about 35 Garfield County 
residents. The Turnabout Ranch has strong support from the local 
community, and the Garfield County Commission, as well as approval from 
the parents of the troubled youth.
  The Government-owned land administered by the BLM surrounds the 
congressional action by passing this legislation in Congress. The land 
was historically used for agriculture and grazing purposes. The 
Townsend family purchased the ranch and then leased the land to the 
Turn-About Ranch, Inc., for the sole purpose of rehabilitating the 
troubled youth, and restoring the values and self-esteem to these 
wayward teens.
  Madam Speaker, this legislation is a fair resolution to a technical 
problem. I hope Congress can implement this legislation and resolve 
this problem to continue helping our troubled adolescent teens.

                          ____________________
```
800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

June 29, 2011 

Mr. Todd Sigler 

Assistant Vice President, Civil Aviation 

Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 

1000 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1700 

Arlington, VA 22209 

Dear Mr. Sigler: 

This letter is in response to your April 18, 2011, petition for rulemaking to amend part 21, 

Subpart G, of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). In your petition, you 

recommend new rulemaking that would allow engine manufacturers to produce articles under 

the engine manufacturer’s production certificate, whereby such articles are type certificated 

as part of an aircraft. 

We find that the proposals in your petition have merit; and we are working to revise our 

regulations and policy to accommodate those changes. 

We will consider your comments and arguments for future rule changes and we will not treat 

your petition as a separate action. 

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 

§§ 40113 and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, your petition for rulemaking is 

hereby denied. 

Accordingly, we will close Docket No. FAA-2011-0441. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Frank P. Paskiewicz 

Acting Deputy Director, Aircraft Certification 

 Service
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        C.E.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


     In connection with the Annual Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


/s/ Michael A. Richardson
----------------------------------------
Michael A. Richardson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  August 29, 2003


<PAGE>
Page 1 of 1 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on July 31, 2022

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 16-1713 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

2 16-1813 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

3 16-1872 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

4 17-0023 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

5 17-0279 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

 6 18-0242 Onekey, LLC 02/05/21 DFR 02/18/21 Closed

 7 18-0731

UHS of Delaware, Inc. and 

Premier Behavioral Health 

Solutions of Florida, Inc. d/b/a 

Suncoast Behavioral Health 

Center

05/19/21 DFR 05/21/21 Closed

8 18-1287 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Closed

 9 18-1288 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Closed

10 18-0701 Midvale Paper Box Company, 

Inc. 10/21/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

11 20-0762 CentiMark Corporation 10/27/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

12 20-0653 Eastern Gas Transmission and 

Storage, Inc. 10/28/21 DFR 11/05/21 Closed

13 19-0622 Anthony Marano Co. 02/10/22 DFR 02/16/22 Closed

14 20-0541 Harvey Builders d/b/a Harvey 

Cleary Builders 03/03/22 DFR 03/11/22 Closed

15 19-0550

UHS of Denver, Inc., d/b/a 

Highlands Behavioral Health 

System

03/31/22 DFR 04/06/22 Closed

16 19-1498 Petroplex Pipe and Construction, 

Inc. 06/16/22 DFR 06/21/22 Open

17 21-0432 Ariana Murrell-Rosario d/b/a 

Liberty Tax Service 07/01/22 DFR 07/13/22 Open

18 20-1212 Roy Rock, LLC 07/14/22 DFR 07/15/22 Open

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
From: Donley, Charles F. [mailto:charles.donley@squirepb.com]

Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 4:27 PM 

### To: Christofano, David(OST) Cc: Finamore, Robert (OST) Subject: RE:Volaris: DOT-OST-2011-0020 

### Hi, David. Volaris will no longer operate Leon-Sacramento orOaxaca-Los Angeles. We therefore request issuance ofthe renewal notice without those two routes. Thanks. Best regards. Charlie From: david.christofano@dot.gov [mailto:david.christofano@dot.qov] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:06 PM To: Donley, Charles F. Cc: Robert.Finamore@dot.gov Subject: Volaris: DOT-OST-2011-0020 Good afternoon Mr. Donley, I'll hopefully be able to send you DOT-OST-2013-0153 and DOT-OST-2013-0161 for Volaris sometime this afternoon. There isone issue for Volaris' DOT-OST-2011-0020 application. The Leon-Sacramento and Oaxaca-Los Angeles designations were both withdrawn within the last year. Do you have any information concerning these withdrawn designations? Thank you, David 

### R.Christofano DOT/Office ofInternational Aviation: X-45 Work Phone #: (202) 366-0584 Work E-mail: david.christofano@dot.gov

44 Offices in21 Countries This message isconfidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Ifyou are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system; you must not copy or disclose the contents ofthis message or any attachment to any other person. Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP ispart ofthe international legal practice Squire Patton Boggs, which operates worldwide through anumber of separate legal entities. Please visit www.sguirepattonboggs.com for more information.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 66 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 66

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2017

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
    savings arrangements established by States for non-governmental 
                               employees.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Savings 
Arrangements

              

 Established by States for Non-Governmental Employees'' (published at 
81 Fed. Reg. 59464 (August 30, 2016)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 10.25    August 15, 2000  Mark Lerner, Assistant
General Counsel Alliance Gaming
Corporation 6601 South Bermuda Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89119  Dear Mark:  In accordance with a
resolution of the board of directors of Alliance Gaming Corporation, Alliance
offers you the positions and titles of Senior Vice President of Law and
Government Affairs, General Counsel, and Secretary, as well as Secretary in
appropriate cases of the Alliance subsidiaries. 
Your duties and oversight responsibilities will include the Alliance
legal and regulatory compliance departments. 
You will report directly to the president of Alliance and to the
Alliance board of directors.  Effective
as of July 14, 2000, your annual salary will be increased to $220,000, and
you will also be eligible to receive regular salary reviews, bonuses, stock
options, insurance, expenses, and other benefits commensurate with your
position with Alliance.  Alliance will
pay the costs and fees of any licensing required because of your new
positions.  If at any time Alliance or
any successor-in-interest to Alliance terminates your employment without cause
(including, without limitation, after or as the result of a merger,
acquisition, spin-off, or other transaction or change of control), or if you
terminate your employment with Alliance or any successor-in-interest to
Alliance for cause, Alliance or its successor in interest as the case may be
shall continue to pay your base salary (subject to customary withholding) and
benefits for up to six months after the termination date, offset by any
compensation and benefits you receive from other employment during that
period.  This letter shall be binding on
Alliance and any of its successors-in-interest.  If you accept this offer,
please sign below and return this letter to me. 
A copy is enclosed for your records. 
Once signed and returned, this letter will comprise a binding agreement
between you and Alliance.  Sincerely,  ALLIANCE GAMING
  CORPORATION/s/ Robert L. MiodunskiRobert L. Miodunski, President6601 SOUTH BERMUDA ROADLAS VEGAS, NEVADA
  89119-3605TELEPHONE:
  (702) 270-7600FAX:
  (702) 263-5636
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 143 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 6, 2018 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2019, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That division C of Public Law 115–245 is amended— 

4 (1) by striking the date specified in section 

5 105(3) and inserting ‘‘December 21, 2018’’; and 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 143 RDS 

1 (2) by adding at the end (before the short title) 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 136. Sections 1309(a) and 1319 of the Na4 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a) 

5 and 4026) shall be applied by substituting the date speci6 fied in section 105(3) of this Act for ‘December 7, 

7 2018’.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.43












     


     


    











     


     


    














     


     


    














     


     


    














     


     


    














     


     


    














     


     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this Sixth Amendment as of the year and date above first written.


 


	 	LANDLORD:
	 	 	 
	 	
        900 NORTH MICHIGAN, LLC,

        a Delaware limited liability company
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ PATRICK MEARA
	 	Print Name:   	PATRICK MEARA
	 	Title:	VICE PRESIDENT
	 	 	 
	 	TENANT:
	 	 
	 	GROSVENOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.,

 an Illinois limited partnership
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Paul Meister
	 	Print Name:   	Paul Meister
	 	Title:	Vice Chairman
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26317]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 576 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-207, K2025-205.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26317 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Summary of Analytical Results

662 - October 2011

Sample ID 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB

Date 10/3/11 10/10/11 10/17/11 10/24/11 10/31/11

Top (ft) 0 0 0 0 0

Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 0 0 0 0 0

Analyte units Diss. (D) Duplicate # 1 1 1 1 1

PFOA ug/L T 6.09 3.51 3.47 9.17 4.84

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services. Reported results 

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid

ug/L = micrograms per Liter

 represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 10/31/11.

 collected on 10/31/11 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

 Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1

0900006480fc8948.xls:Sheet1

2/29/2012 11:26 AM
H. J. Res. 66 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

Joint Resolution 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to savings 

arrangements established by States for non-governmental employees. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘Savings Arrangements Established by States for Non-Governmental Employees’’ (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 59464 (August 30, 

2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.