alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State ex rel. Yager, Appellant, vs. Wilcox, Respondent.

*February 3*

February *24, 1914.*

*Opening default: Discretion.*

*An*order refusing to open a default and reinstate a cause is a discretionary order and will not be disturbed unless there was an abuse of discretion.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Polk county: FeaNK A. Eoss, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Action of *quo*warranto, involving the title to the office of school district director. The action was commenced in the spring of 1911 in the circuit court for Polk county, was continued for cause shown at the February, 1912, term of court, was on the calendar for trial at the September, 1912, term of court, and when regularly reached on the 21st day of that month there was no appearance for the relator and judgment, of dismissal was ordered. November 25, 1912, appellant moved to set aside the default and reinstate the case upon affidavits showing that there had been some negotiations for settlement before the September term; that Mr. Dorothy, the local attorney for the appellant, supposed that a settlement had been arranged between Mr. McGhee (an attorney of St. Paul, who was also acting for the appellant and who died September 19th) and the respondent, and for that reason was. not present when the case was reached for trial. This motion *173was opposed by affidavits tending to sbow that the settlement negotiations had failed and that appellant personally knew that fact on the 18th of September. It also appeared that the term of office had expired and that another person was holding the same when the action was dismissed, so that the only real question between the parties had become one of costs. The court denied the motion to reinstate the ease and rendered judgment of dismissal, from which judgment this appeal is taken.

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the briefs of *Frank B.*Dorothy, and for the respondent on that of *Kennedy & Yates.*

Winslow, O. J.

An order refusing to open a default and reinstate a cause is a discretionary order. No abuse of discretion appearing in the present case, the judgment must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— It is so ordered.
Back to Contents

Exhibit 13.a

Certification
  CEO under Section 906

Pursuant to section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, the undersigned officer of Akzo Nobel N.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands (the
company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) of the company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

| |       |                     |  |        |                                           | 
| | ----- | ------------------- |  | ------ | ----------------------------------------- | 
| | Date: | June
      22, 2006 |  | By:    | /s/
      G.J. Wijers                     | 
| |       |                     |  |        |                                           | 
| |       |                     |  |        |                                           | 
| |       |                     |  | Name:  | G.J.
      Wijers                         | 
| |       |                     |  |        |                                           | 
| |       |                     |  |        |                                           | 
| |       |                     |  | Title: | Chairman
      of the Board of Management | 
| |       |                     |  |        |                                           | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis W. Blazer, Vice President-Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Dennis W. BlazerDennis W. BlazerVice President-Finance and Administration andChief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, I, David Szostak, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PetroAlgae Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PetroAlgae Inc.



|                  |  |                              
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ David Szostak
|Name:             |  | David Szostak                
|Title:            |  | President                    
|                  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: November 16, 2009

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Edward James Demolle, Appellant

No. 06-22-00113-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 28002). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

van Cleef, Chief Justice Stevens and Justice 

Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Edward James Demolle, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 26, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for September 2016



1.
Cases Pending Beginning of Month 
30




2.
Cases Added to Docket 

Longhorn Service Company
No. 13-1458
Mandate from the Tenth Circuit issued on August 8, 2016

Employment 2000 Corp.
No. 16-0858
Direction for Review on September 6, 2016

Jessica Hicks dba Logs to Lumber and Beyond
No. 16-0757
Direction for Review on September 6, 2016


3

3.
Cases Subtracted From Docket

Longhorn Service Company
No. 13-1458
Remand Order on September 20, 2016

Employment 2000 Corp.
No. 16-0858
Remand Order on September 28, 2016

Jessica Hicks dba Logs to Lumber and Beyond
No. 16-0757
Decision on September 29, 2016

Empire Roofing Company Southeast, LLC
No. 13-1034
Decision on September 29, 2016


-4
4.
Total Cases Pending End of Month
29
# Official Journal C 368/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 368 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6230 October 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 368

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6230 October 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 368/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — eighth supplement to the 37th complete edition | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 368/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — eighth supplement to the 37th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
BREAKOUT SESSION 

DISCUSSION POINTS –

GENERAL INDUSTRY

NIOSH Personal Protective Equipment 

Conformity Assessment Public Meeting
1) Who defines the BHSRs for your industry?

• Look at Environment

• How is PPT used?

• Experts on Specific Consensus Standards

• Standards Setting Organizations

• Government Agencies

• Safety Professionals and IH’s at particular locations

• OSHA requires employers to make this determination
2) How should the BHSRs be established?

• Environment

• Risk

• Broad set of applications

• Define Hazard category

• Put PPT in category

• What standards exist to address hazards?

• Link CA to PPE/category
3) Who should address what PPE is 

needed to meet BHSRs?

• Safety Professional / IH / Superintendent...

• End users

• Unique applications complicate

• Develop a baseline

• Choice of standard?

• Is product adequate?

• Is CA appropriate?

• PPT a big pot / how to break up?

• 1

st 3 questions not CA

• Needed to apply std. and appropriate CA
4) Who determines the technical standards that 

demonstrate the BHSRs are met?

• Driver – Liability for PPT

• Manufacturers

• Individual parties / safety professionals

• 3

rd party

• NIOSH / OSHA

• CA due diligence valuable to manufacturer

• Standard setting bodies
5) How are conformity assessment 

requirements linked to PPE types?

• Regulatory authority

• Certification Organization (eg. NFPA)

• Safety Professional
Feedback on Schedule

• Is there another PCAWG meeting incorporated into 

schedule?

• Framework didn’t use PCAWG input

• Next public meeting should be full day
Other points made 

• Is the draft scope based on a perceived lack of CA 

requirements in PPE Standards?

• Do BHSR’s come from European Directive?

• Answer – BHSR’s built into programs like OSHA’s referencing 

performance standards

• CA / BHSR’s need to be incorporated more into 

performance standards

• What does BHSR mean in this context?
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 42 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2017

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
         drug testing of unemployment compensation applicants.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Federal-State

              

 Unemployment Compensation Program; Middle Class Tax Relief and Job 
Creation Act of 2012 Provision on Establishing Appropriate Occupations 
for Drug Testing of Unemployment Compensation Applicants'' (published 
at 81 Fed. Reg. 50298 (August 1, 2016)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2362]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    COMMENDING PENNY HOLMES ABRAHAM

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. RODNEY ALEXANDER

                              of louisiana

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. ALEXANDER. Madam Speaker, I rise today to commend Penny Holmes 
Abraham for her accomplishments and work benefitting Central Louisiana.
  For the past 11 years, Mrs. Abraham has been an excellent art teacher 
at Alexandria Country Day School and has established an art program 
recognized throughout the community for its high standards and talented 
students.
  Mrs. Abraham's efforts at Alexandria Country Day School earned a 
$5,000 prize for the school in the educational competition as part of 
the ``Heart of Spain'' exhibit in Alexandria.
  Her students have won numerous awards, and their works have been 
highlighted on book covers, presented in art exhibits, as well as 
featured in fundraisers for St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and 
the American Heart Association. Mrs. Abraham and her students have also 
been a fundamental part of the River Oaks Art Square Van Gogh Gala by 
contributing hundreds of pieces of art for the auction.
  Moreover, Mrs. Abraham has volunteered as the art instructor for 
children who are being served by the Rapides Children's Advocacy Center 
and has assisted them in producing art work for a CASA calendar. She 
created several pieces of art to be used in the show home tour for 
another CASA fundraiser.
  Mrs. Abraham's art work has been displayed in numerous private homes 
and businesses throughout the area, giving her a prominent role in the 
professional art community in Central Louisiana.
  For these endeavors, it was my honor to select Mrs. Abraham to create 
the 2008 White House Christmas ornament for Louisiana's 5th 
Congressional District. Her work, truly illustrative of the region, is 
displayed on this year's White House Christmas tree.
  Madam Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me in commending Mrs. 
Abraham for her aptitude and accomplishments benefitting Central 
Louisiana.

                          ____________________
```
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS A P- 76, 059 & A P- 76, 060 E X P AR T E T E RR E NC E L ADON B RO ADWAY O n A ppl i cat i ons forW r i t s of H abea s C orpus f r om H a rris C o u n ty W OM ACK , J. , f i l ed a conc ur r i ng opi ni on, i n w hi ch J OH N S ON , J. , j oi ned . I j oi n t he C our t ’ s opi ni on, and I fi l e thi s opi ni on onl yt o comm enton i t s us e of the te rm “ p le a -b a rg a in c a s e .” A s th e C o u rt ’s o p in io n p o in ts o u t, a n te atnot e 3, w e have gi ven thatt er m a s peci al d e f in itio n in R u le o f

A p p e lla te P ro c e d u re 2 5 .2 (a )( 2 ): “ In a p le a b a rg a in c a s e – th a t is , a c a se in w h ich a d e f

e n d a n t’s p lea w a s g u iltyo r n o lo c o n ten d e re a n d th e p u n ish m e n t d id notexce ed the puni s hm entr ecomm ended byt he pr os ecut orand agr eed t o byt he defendan t... . ” (I n such a case a def end ant’ s r i gh tt o ap peal i s l i m i t ed to “on l y(A ) tho se m at t er s t hatw er e r ai s ed byw r i t t en mot i on fi l ed and rul ed on bef or e tr i al , or( B ) aft er( Br oadway - 2)

gett i ng t he tr i al cou rt ’s perm i ssi on t o ap peal. ”) Th i s case w as not a pl ea-bargai n case u n d e rt h a td e f

i n i t i o n , a n d R u l e 2 5 . 2 ’ s r e s t r i c t i o n o n a p p e a l d i d n o ta p p l y. B utpl ea ba r gai ns , i n t he comm on m eani ng of t he t er m , m aybe of manyot her ki nds t hatdo noti nvol ve agr eed r ecomm endat i ons of puni s hm entbyt he pr os ecut or . T he m os tfr equentm aybe a de fenda nt ’ s agr eementt o pl ead gui l t yi n one ca s e ( w i t houtan agr eementon puni s hm ent ) i n r etur n fort he di s m i s s al of, oran agr eementnott o br i ng, pr os ecut i ons forot heroffe ns es . O t herbar gai ns m ayaff ectt he puni s hm entw i t hout comi ng w i t hi n t he R ul e 25. 2 defi ni t i on of “pl ea ba r gai n cas e. ” Forexampl e, t he part i es m ayagr ee that , i n a ca s e i n w hi ch t her e mi ghtbe an i s s ue of a deadl yw eapon’ s bei ng us ed ( w hi ch w oul d aff

ecta def endant ’ s el i gi bi l i t yforpar ol e; s ee s ect i on 508. 145( d) of t he G overnm entC ode) , t he j udgm entw i l l noti ncl ude an a ffi r m at i ve fi ndi ng of s uch us e. T oday ’ s deci s i on i ns ur es t hats uch pl ea- bar gai n agr eement s , even though t heydo notcome w i t hi n t he def i ni t i on i n R ul e 25. 2, m us tbe cons i der ed t o have “ cons t i tut ed a bar gai n, ” as w e s ai d ( a n te , at 6 ). A n d , as w e h o ld to d a y , a d e f e n d a n t m a yv o lu n tar ily m ake s uch an a gr eement . I ts eems c l eart o m e, al t hough t oday ’ s cas e does noti nvol ve the i s s ue, t hatt he St at e w oul d be r equi r ed t o per for m i t s par tof t he agr eement . I s s ues of t he t r i al cour t ’ s author i t yt o r ej ects uch agr eement s s ur el yw i l l ar i s e, and the R ul e 25. 2 cas es w i l l pr ovi de gui dance . E n banc. Fi l ed D ece m ber16, 2009. Publ i s h.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Building
Materials Corporation of America (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
April 3, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), William W. Collins, as Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company, and John F. Rebele, as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:


          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ William W. Collins
-----------------------------------------------
Name: William W. Collins
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President

Date:  May 18, 2005




/s/ John F. Rebele
-----------------------------------------------
Name: John F. Rebele
Title: Senior Vice President and
       Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 18, 2005



           This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

     I, Hunter M.A. Carr, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ITIS Holdings Inc.,
a Nevada Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
     on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
     to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure
     internal control over financial reporting.

     Date: March 31, 2005
     --------------------

     /s/ Hunter M.A. Carr
     --------------------
     Name: Hunter M.A. Carr
     Title: Chief Executive Officer