21732 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4) 

of this AD. 

(1) For airplanes on which the inspection 

specified in paragraph (g) of this AD is 

accomplished on or after the effective date of 

this AD: Submit the report within 30 days 

after performing the inspection. 

(2) For airplanes on which the inspection 

specified in paragraph (g) of this AD is 

accomplished before the effective date of this 

AD: Submit the report within 30 days after 

the effective date of this AD. 

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–1138; fax 425–227–1149. 

Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116- 

AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using 

any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 

principal inspector, or lacking a principal 

inspector, the manager of the local flight 

standards district office/certificate holding 

district office. The AMOC approval letter 

must specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer, the action must 

be accomplished using a method approved 

by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 

116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or 

the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If 

approved by the DOA, the approval must 

include the DOA-authorized signature. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, nor 

shall a person be subject to a penalty for 

failure to comply with a collection of 

information subject to the requirements of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that 

collection of information displays a current 

valid OMB Control Number. The OMB 

Control Number for this information 

collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for 

this collection of information is estimated to 

be approximately 5 minutes per response, 

including the time for reviewing instructions, 

completing and reviewing the collection of 

information. All responses to this collection 

of information are mandatory. Comments 

concerning the accuracy of this burden and 

suggestions for reducing the burden should 

be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence 

Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: 

Information Collection Clearance Officer, 

AES–200. 

(4) Required for Compliance (RC): If any 

service information contains procedures or 

tests that are identified as RC, those 

procedures and tests must be done to comply 

with this AD; any procedures or tests that are 

not identified as RC are recommended. Those 

procedures and tests that are not identified 

as RC may be deviated from using accepted 

methods in accordance with the operator’s 

maintenance or inspection program without 

obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided 

the procedures and tests identified as RC can 

be done and the airplane can be put back in 

an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or 

changes to procedures or tests identified as 

RC require approval of an AMOC. 

(k) Related Information 

Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2014–0197, dated 

September 4, 2014, for related information. 

This MCAI may be found in the AD docket 

on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov 

by searching for and locating Docket No. 

FAA–2015–8136. 

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–3202, 

dated May 6, 2014. 

(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–3212, 

dated May 6, 2014. 

(iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53– 

3213, dated May 6, 2014. 

(iv) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53– 

3214, dated May 6, 2014. 

(v) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–3216, 

dated May 6, 2014. 

(vi) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53– 

3217, dated May 6, 2014. 

(vii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53– 

3218, dated May 6, 2014. 

(viii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53– 

3219, dated May 6, 2014. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness 

Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 

31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 

5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email 

airworthiness.A330–A340@airbus.com; 

Internet http://www.airbus.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 

31, 2016. 

Victor Wicklund, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2016–08366 Filed 4–12–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–4204; Directorate 

Identifier 2015–NM–001–AD; Amendment 

39–18482; AD 2016–08–06] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, 

and F4–600R series airplanes, and 

Model A300 C4–605R Variant F 

airplanes (collectively called Model 

A300–600 series airplanes), modified by 

a particular supplemental type 

certificate (STC). This AD was prompted 

by a report of chafing found on the 

overflow sensor harness of the surge 

tank, and subsequent contact between 

the electrical wiring and fuel tank 

structure. This AD requires a one-time 

inspection for damage of the outer tank 

overflow sensor harness, and repair if 

necessary. This AD also requires 

modification of the sensor harness. We 

are issuing this AD to prevent chafing of 

the harness and subsequent contact 

between the electrical wiring and fuel 

tank structure, which could result in 

electrical arcing and a fuel tank 

explosion. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 

18, 2016. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of May 18, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this final rule, contact 

Simmonds Precision Products, Inc., A 

UTC Aerospace Company, 100 Panton 

Road, Vergennes, VT 05491; phone 802– 

877–2911; fax 802–877–4444; Internet 

http://www.utcaerospacesystems.com. 

You may view this referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA. For information on 

the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also 

available on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 

4204. 


jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 21733 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 

4204; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

the Docket Office (telephone 800–647– 

5527) is Docket Management Facility, 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, M–30, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marc Ronell, Aerospace Engineer, 

Boston Aircraft Certification Office, 

ANE–150, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, 

Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781– 

238–7776; fax: 781–238–7170; email: 

marc.ronell@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to certain Airbus Model A300 B4– 

600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series 

airplanes, and Model A300 C4–605R 

Variant F airplanes (collectively called 

Model A300–600 series airplanes), 

modified by a particular STC. The 

NPRM published in the Federal 

Register on October 23, 2015 (80 FR 

64371) (‘‘the NPRM’’). 

The European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA), which is the Technical Agent 

for the Member States of the European 

Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness 

Directive 2013–0193, dated August 23, 

2013 (referred to after this as the 

Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness 

Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct 

an unsafe condition for all Airbus 

Model A300 series airplanes and all 

Model A300–600 series airplanes. 

The MCAI corresponds to FAA AD 

2015–03–03, Amendment 39–18099 (80 

FR 11101, March 2, 2015) (‘‘AD 2015– 

03–03’’), which applies to Airbus Model 

A300 series airplanes and Model A300– 

600 series airplanes, all serial numbers, 

except for airplanes modified by STC 

ST00092BO (http://rgl.faa.gov/

Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/

rgstc.nsf/0/D41C5AE8E46B49018625749

00069E004?OpenDocument&Highlight=

st00092bo). 

In AD 2015–03–03, we explained that 

airplanes that have had the in-tank fuel 

quantity system modified by STC 

ST00092BO cannot accomplish the 

actions required by AD 2015–03–03 by 

using Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28– 

6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 

2013. 

We also stated that we were 

considering separate rulemaking to 

require the procedures and compliance 

time specified in UTC Aerospace 

Systems Service Bulletin 300723–28–03 

(V–1577), dated October 10, 2014, for 

airplanes modified by STC ST00092BO. 

We have determined that further 

rulemaking is indeed necessary, and 

this AD follows from that 

determination. 

You may examine the MCAI in the 

AD docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 

4204. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. We 

have considered the comments received. 

The following presents the comments 

received on the NPRM and the FAA’s 

response to each comment. 

Request To Extend Proposed 

Compliance Time 

FedEx asked that we extend the 

compliance time required by paragraph 

(g) of the proposed AD from 12 to 30 

months. FedEx stated that AD 2015–03– 

03 required accomplishing the 

inspection and rerouting within 30 

months. FedEx added that, in both AD 

2015–03–03 and the NPRM, improper 

harness routing is the root cause of the 

issue, and stated that airplanes having 

STC ST00092BO have equal 

susceptibility to harness chafing damage 

as those identified in AD 2015–03–03. 

FedEx suggested that a 30-month 

compliance time would still provide an 

acceptable level of safety. FedEx added 

that it is expecting to wait four to six 

months for one of the required 

materials, and the availability of its 

installation tool has not been confirmed. 

FedEx also stated that a longer 

compliance time would allow it to 

minimize the operational impact and 

accomplish the potentially lengthy 

service information at C-checks. 

We do not agree with the commenter’s 

request to extend the compliance time, 

because the request is not supported by 

any analysis or supporting data. This 

compliance time is shorter to account 

for the time already elapsed for 

airplanes having STC ST00092BO. In 

developing an appropriate compliance 

time for the actions specified in this AD, 

we considered the safety implications 

and normal maintenance schedules for 

the timely accomplishment of the 

specified actions. We have determined 

that the proposed 12-month compliance 

time will ensure an acceptable level of 

safety and allow the actions to be done 

during scheduled maintenance intervals 

for most affected operators. However, 

affected operators may request an 

alternative method of compliance 

(AMOC) to request an extension of the 

compliance time under the provisions of 

paragraph (i) of this AD by submitting 

data and analysis substantiating that the 

change would provide an acceptable 

level of safety. We have not changed 

this AD in this regard. 

Request To Increase Work Hour 

Estimate 

FedEx stated that, although the 

referenced service information specifies 

14 work-hours per airplane for 

accomplishing both actions, the number 

of work-hours could be closer to 24, 

especially if a harness is replaced. 

We infer that the commenter is 

requesting that the work–hour estimate 

specified in the ‘‘Costs of Compliance’’ 

section be increased. We partially agree 

with the request. We provided our best 

estimate for the work hours based on the 

information received from the airplane 

manufacturer and specified in the 

referenced service information. 

However, we do not know the number 

of work-hours it would take to replace 

a harness, and as stated in the ‘‘Costs of 

Compliance’’ section, we have received 

no definitive data that would enable us 

to provide cost estimates for the oncondition actions. We have not changed 

this final rule in this regard. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

as proposed except for minor editorial 

changes. We have determined that these 

minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM for 

correcting the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM. 

Related Service Information Under 1 

CFR Part 51 

UTC Aerospace Systems has issued 

Service Bulletin 300723–28–03 (V– 

1577), Revision 01, dated July 20, 2015. 

The service information describes 

procedures for an inspection for damage 

of the outer tank of the overflow sensor 

harness, repair, and modification of the 

sensor harness. This service information 

is reasonably available because the 

interested parties have access to it 

through their normal course of business 


jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
21734 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

or by the means identified in the 

ADDRESSES section. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 65 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We also estimate that it takes about 3 

work-hours per product to comply with 

the inspection required by this AD. The 

average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. 

Based on these figures, we estimate the 

cost of this inspection required by this 

AD on U.S. operators to be $16,575, or 

$255 per product. 

We estimate that it takes about 11 

work-hours per product to comply with 

the modification requirements of this 

AD. The average labor rate is $85 per 

work-hour. Required parts cost about 

$100 per product. Based on these 

figures, we estimate the cost of this 

modification on U.S. operators to be 

$67,275, or $1,035 per product. 

We have received no definitive data 

that would enable us to provide cost 

estimates for the on-condition actions 

specified in this AD. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this AD will not 

have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2016–08–06 Airbus: Amendment 39–18482; 

Docket No. FAA–2015–4204; Directorate 

Identifier 2015–NM–001–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD becomes effective May 18, 2016. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes 

specified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), 

and (c)(4) of this AD; certificated in any 

category; modified by Simmonds Precision 

Products, Inc., Supplemental Type Certificate 

(STC) ST00092BO (http://rgl.faa.gov/

Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/

0/D41C5AE8E46B4901862574900069E004

?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00092bo). 

(1) Model A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, 

and B4–622 airplanes. 

(2) Model A300 B4–605R and B4–622R 

airplanes. 

(3) Model A300 F4–605R and F4–622R 

airplanes. 

(4) Model A300 C4–605R Variant F 

airplanes. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 28, Fuel. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by a report of 

chafing found on the overflow sensor harness 

of the surge tank, and subsequent contact 

between the electrical wiring and fuel tank 

structure. We are issuing this AD to prevent 

chafing of the harness and subsequent 

contact between the electrical wiring and fuel 

tank structure, which could result in 

electrical arcing and a fuel tank explosion. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) One-Time Inspection and Repair 

Within 12 months after the effective date 

of this AD: Do the actions required by 

paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD, 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of UTC Aerospace Systems 

Service Bulletin 300723–28–03 (V–1577), 

Revision 01, dated July 20, 2015. 

(1) Perform a one-time general visual 

inspection for damage of the outer tank 

sensor harness, and if any damage is found 

on the expando sleeving, before further flight, 

do a detailed inspection of the underlying 

wires for exposed conductor wires. If any 

exposed conductor wire is found, before 

further flight, replace the outer wing harness 

assembly. 

(2) Install new brackets and re-route the 

surge tank overflow sensor harness. 

(3) Modify the harness protection. 

(h) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for actions 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those 

actions were performed before the effective 

date of this AD using UTC Aerospace 

Systems Service Bulletin 300723–28–03 (V– 

1577), dated October 10, 2014. This service 

information is not incorporated by reference 

in this AD. 

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Boston Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), ANE–150, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 

39.19, send your request to your principal 

inspector or local Flight Standards District 

Office, as appropriate. If sending information 

directly to the manager of the ACO, send it 

to the attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(j) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Marc Ronell, Aerospace Engineer, 

Boston Aircraft Certification Office, ANE– 

150, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, 

MA 01803; phone: 781–238–7776; fax: 781– 

238–7170; email: marc.ronell@faa.gov. 

(2) Service information identified in this 

AD that is not incorporated by reference is 

available at the addresses specified in 

paragraphs (k)(3) and (k)(4) of this AD. 

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 


jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 21735 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) UTC Aerospace Systems Service 

Bulletin 300723–28–03 (V–1577), Revision 

01, dated July 20, 2015. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Simmonds Precision 

Products, Inc., A UTC Aerospace Company, 

100 Panton Road, Vergennes, VT 05491; 

phone 802–877–2911; fax 802–877–4444; 

Internet http://www.utcaero

spacesystems.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://www.archives.

gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 

30, 2016. 

Victor Wicklund, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2016–08352 Filed 4–12–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–3771; Airspace 

Docket No. 15–ANM–28] 

Establishment of Class E Airspace, 

South Bend, WA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule, correction. 

SUMMARY: This action corrects 

administrative errors in a final rule 

published in the Federal Register of 

March 8, 2016, that establishes Class E 

airspace at Willapa Harbor Heliport, 

South Bend, WA, by amending the 

assigned paragraph for rule 

incorporation within FAA Order 

7400.9Z, by correcting format errors in 

the text header of the airspace legal 

description, and by correcting 

inconsistent airport name information 

in the airspace legal description. These 

changes do not affect the boundaries or 

operating requirements of the airspace. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, May 26, 

2016. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under Title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom 

Clark, Federal Aviation Administration, 

Operations Support Group, Western 

Service Center, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA 98057; Telephone: (425) 

203–4511. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

The FAA published a final rule in the 

Federal Register establishing Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface at Willapa Harbor 

Heliport, South Bend, WA (81 FR 12001 

March 8, 2016) Docket No. FAA–2015– 

3771. Subsequent to publication the 

FAA identified errors in the assigned 

paragraph for incorporation, text header 

format, and airport name information. 

This action corrects the errors. 

Correction to Final Rule 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, in the 

Federal Register of March 8, 2016 (81 

FR 12001) FR Doc. 2016–05059, 

Establishment of Class E airspace, South 

Bend, WA, is corrected as follows: 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

On page 12002, column 1, line 17, 

remove ‘‘Paragraph 5000 Class D 

Airspace’’, and add in its place 

‘‘Paragraph 6005. Class E airspace Areas 

Extending Upward from 700 feet or 

more Above the Surface of the Earth.’’ 

On page 12002, column 1, line 19 and 

20, remove ‘‘ANM WA E5 Willapa 

Harbor Heliport, South Bend, WA 

[New]’’ and add in its place ‘‘ANM WA 

E5 South Bend, WA [New].’’ 

On page 12002, column 1, lines 27, 

28, 34 and 35, after the word ‘Harbor’ 

add the word ‘Heliport’. 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on April 5, 

2016. 

Tracey Johnson, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Western 

Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2016–08395 Filed 4–12–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0165; FRL–9944–68– 

Region 9] 

Promulgation of Air Quality 

Implementation Plans; Arizona; 

Regional Haze Federal Implementation 

Plan; Reconsideration 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is revising portions of the 

Arizona Regional Haze Federal 

Implementation Plan (FIP) applicable to 

the Coronado Generating Station 

(Coronado) and the Cholla Power Plant 

(Cholla). In response to a petition for 

reconsideration from the Salt River 

Project Agricultural Improvement and 

Power District (SRP), the owner and 

operator of Coronado, we are replacing 

a plant-wide compliance method with a 

unit-specific compliance method for 

determining compliance with the best 

available retrofit technology (BART) 

emission limits for nitrogen oxides 

(NOX) from Units 1 and 2 at Coronado. 

While the plant-wide limit for NOX

emissions from Units 1 and 2 was 

established as 0.065 lb/MMBtu, we are 

now setting a unit-specific limit of 0.065 

lb/MMBtu for Unit 1 and 0.080 lb/

MMBtu for Unit 2. In addition, we are 

revising the work practice standard in 

the FIP for Coronado. Finally, we are 

removing the affirmative defense for 

malfunctions, which applied to both 

Coronado and Cholla. 

DATES: Effective date: This rule will be 

effective May 13, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0165. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., confidential business information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available electronically through http://

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vijay Limaye, U.S. EPA, Region 9, 

Planning Office, Air Division, Air–2, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 

94105; telephone number: (415) 972– 

3086; email address: limaye.vijay@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Definitions 

II. Background 

III. Proposed Action 

IV. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

V. Final Action 

VI. Environmental Justice Considerations 

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 


jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES