alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT and CYTEC INDUSTRlES INC. TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDERNO. 8114 MODIFICATION
TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION In the matter ofa Trading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and CYTEC Industries Inc. ("CYTEC"). WHEREAS, the Commissionerand CYTEC, having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 81 14 issued on December20, 1996, do now, by mutual agreement, modify paragraphs C.I., E.I., E.3. and C.IO. as follows: I. Change the second date specified in paragraph C.1. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 2. Replace paragraph E.1. as follows: No laterthan March I of 1999, 2000, 200I, 2002, 2003 and 2004, CYTEC shall submitto the Commissioner an annual report on 

### NO" emissions for each unit in the averaging set in accordance with Par. D.3 for each unit in the averaging set during the previous 12 month calendar year. This report shall include a demonstration that the averaging set has achieved compliance with conditions ofthis order for each month and with the annual emission limit in 

### tons. 3. Change the first date specified in paragraph E.3. from September I, 1998 to September I, 2002. 4. Change the second date specified in paragraph E.3. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 5. Change the first date specified in paragraph E.IO. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. All other terms and conditions ofTrading**Agr~ement** and Order No. 8114 issued 

### by the Commissioner acting under Sections 22a-6. 22a-171. 22a-174. 22a·176, 22a-177 and 22a-178 of the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

Initials 

# //;1
(Printed on Recycled Paper) 19 Elm Streel • Hartford, CT 06106·5121 hllP:lIdep.SIalc.Ct.us A.n Equal Oppor/unity Empfoyu Date:

# .'

CYTEC INDUSTRlES INC, 2 TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDERNO, 8114 MODIFICATION

CYTEC Industries Inc. hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice. CYTEC Industries Inc. Signature: 

## -----"-izh.=c;-,

# ,--,/~---'[''--c'rU,-",,-,'J.v:Y'--'.,,------ I Type Name: Type Title: Date: Stephen Johns Plant Manager
Apri] '2, 1999 Entered as amodification ofan Orderofthe Commissi ner ofEnvirorunental Protection numbered 8114 this

# _~d~2L- 

# __ day of

# ---.L-',i~~__ 1999,**~rthur** 1. Rocque, Jr. Commissioner TOWN OF WALLINGFORD LAND RECORDS MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Certified DocumentNo.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40395

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARCOS ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-PRADO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-1114-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcos HernandezPrado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California. Hernandez-Prado has filed a response. Our independent 1

review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Hernandez-Prado’s response discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 20, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-40395 Document: 00511008608 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/20/2010
No. 09-40395

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

2

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

2

Case: 09-40395 Document: 00511008608 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/20/2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 658 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-316, K2025-314.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26604 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William S. Ayer, Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|   |  |                                              
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|By |  | /S/ William S. Ayer                          
|   |  | William S. Ayer                              
|   |  | Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
|   |  | February 17, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                              EXHIBIT 23(a)



                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our reports dated February 13, 2001, included in this Form
10-K, into The Alpine Group, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-16703, 2-70015, 33-62544 and 333-60071) and on
Forms S-3 (File Nos. 33-30246, 33-53434, 333-60073, 333-00301, 33-63819 and
33-81996).

Arthur Andersen LLP



Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 2001
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:FAA-2012-1107 (2011-NM-216-AD)
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10(uu)



                                  [LETTERHEAD]

                                                              As of May 1, 1998

The Alpine Group, Inc.
1790 Broadway, Suite 1500
New York, NY 10019-1412

Re:  Services Agreement dated as of October 2, 1996 by and between 
     The Alpine Group, Inc. and Superior Telecom Inc., as amended by
     letter agreement dated as of May 1, 1997 (as so amended the "Agreement")

Gentlemen:

     This will memorialize our agreement to extend the captioned Agreement 
for a term commencing as of the date hereof and expiring April 30, 1999, it 
being understood that in consideration for your rendering the services 
provided for under the Agreement, the undersigned shall continue to pay to 
you the annual $2,717,000 service fee and other reimbursable amounts as 
payable thereunder in the manner provided for under the Agreement.

     The terms of this extension have been approved by the Audit Committee of 
the Board of Directors of Superior Telecom Inc.

     As modified hereby the Agreement is hereby expressly ratified and 
confirmed.

     If the foregoing conforms with your understanding of the agreement 
reached between us, kindly execute a copy of this letter so indicating.

                                       Very truly yours,

Agreed to as of the date first  
hereinabove set forth                  SUPERIOR TELECOM INC.
THE ALPINE GROUP, INC.


By:  /s/ Bragi F. Schut                By:  /s/ Steven S. Elbaum
   ----------------------------           -------------------------------
   Bragi F. Schut                         Steven S. Elbaum

Its:  Executive Vice President            Its:  President and
cc:  Gary Edwards X                             Chief Executive Officer
#### RICHMOND M. PEARSON, Adm’r, of MARTHA TENNESON *v.*JOHN TAYLOR

Martha Tennesson the first child that should be born alive of the. body of Dice after the time he was speaking, to wit: the date of his will, and that she would take such first born child whether born in the life time of the testator or after his death. Where a testator bequeathed his negro woman Dice to his daughter Betsey, and added “ the first born of Dice that is living hereafter to fall to Martha Tennesson,” *it was*held, that the intention of the testator was to give to

This was an action of trover for a negro slave, named joe tried at Davie on the last circuit before his Honor Judge . SETTLE.

The plaintiff claimed under the following bequest in the will of Caleb Webb, deceased — “ and to my eldest daughter Betsey, I will and bequeath forever to her and her heirs, one negro woman Dice, one horse beast, one cow and calf, one bedstead and furniture for the same, the first born of Dice that is living hereafter to fall to Martha Tennesson, three sheep and one saddle to Betsey.” It was alleged by the plaintiff that the slave Joe, for the conversion of whom this suit was brought, was the first born of Dice as described the will. There was testimony showing that there were other children born of Dice before Joe, but whether they were born before or after the date of the will, did not

His Honor instructed the jury that the will of the testator ^ not ta^e e^"ect bis death, and that no child of Dice bom alive during the life of the testator would satisfy the bequest; but if they believed that Joe was the first born j)jce; after the death of the 'testator, the plaintiff would be entitled to recover. The jury returned á verdict for the *61defendant, and the plaintiff, moved for a new trial upon the ground that the Judge ought to have charged the jury, that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, if Joe were the first born of Dice after the date of the will, though he were born in the testator’s life-time. The motion was overruled and the plaintiff appealed.

Dec. 1838.

*Boyden*and *Cook,*for the plaintiff.

*D. F. Caldwell,*for the defendant.

Daniel, Judge,

after stating the case proceeded as follows : — It seems to us, that the intention of the testator, was to give to Martha Tennesson, the first child that should be born alive of the body of Dice, after the time he was speaking, to wit, after the date of his will. The first child born alive of Dice, after the date of the will, would be a specific legacy; and if that child died, in the life-time of the testator, it would be the legatee’s misfortune. But on the contrary, if Joe was the first child born of Dice after the date of the will, the plaintiff would be entitled to recover hjs value, whether he was born before or after the death of the testator. We think the Judge erred when he said, that no child of Dice born alive during the life of the testator would satisfy the bequest.

The judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted.

Pee, Curiam. Judgment reversed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        DIGITAL DESCRIPTOR SYSTEMS, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
Shupin, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies
            with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Digital
Descriptor Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

Date: August 22, 2005


/s/ Anthony Shupin
-------------------------------------
Anthony Shupin
President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 113 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.113
                                          Agreed to June 5, 2018        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 16, 2018, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
        (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
        (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000001923
<NAME> ABRAMS INDUSTRIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,448,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,402,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (122,396)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,972,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,578,575
<PP&E>                                      83,726,979
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,046,976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             126,132,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,692,673
<BONDS>                                     56,554,488
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,014,039
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,258,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               126,132,540
<SALES>                                    188,483,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           188,971,527
<CGS>                                      171,114,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              171,114,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,566,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (7,644)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,262,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (963,619)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (287,588)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (676,031)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)




</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER Appellate case name: In re The State of Texas ex rel. Kim Ogg, Harris County District Attorney Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 006 44

- CR ; 01

- 20

- 00645

- CR; 01

- 20

- 006 46

- CR Trial court case number: 1680891; 1684291; 1684291 Trial court: 228th District Court of Harris County Relator has filed a motion for leave to amend its petition for writ of mandamus in these causes , claiming that it failed to include a challenge to another order for production of documents. Visiting Judge Leslie Yates ordered relator to produce a number of documents, which order was adopted by Judge Aguilar, but in its original petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenged only the order to produce offense repor ts S

- 19

- 07 and NS

- 20

- 08. Relator now asserts that it intended to challenge another order of production and asks to amend its petition to challenge not only the order to produce reports S

- 19

- 07 and NS

- 20

- 08, but also the order to produce “all mapping, pow er points, or reports prepared by Harris County District Attorney’s Office Investigator Nathaniel Gates.” The motion for leave is GRANTED . The amended petitions for writ of mandamus are ordered filed in th e se causes as of September 24, 2020

. Because re al party in interest has already filed a response to the original petitions, the Court GRANTS real party 15 days from the date of this order to file a response to the amended petitions. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Richard Hightower

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court
Date: __ September 25, 2020

___
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND
(B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Mymetics Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2003
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 12, 2004        /s/ Christian Rochet
                                -----------------------------------------------
                                President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 12, 2004        /s/ Ernst Lubke
                                -----------------------------------------------
                                Principal financial and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as a separate
disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Form 10-K for the year endedMarch 31, 2005 of AMERCO (the “Company”), asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission onJune 22, 2005 (the “Report”), I, Jack A.Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     AMERCO,     a Nevada corporation      /s/ Jack A. Peterson       Jack A. Peterson *Chief Financial Officer*Date: June 22, 2005
# Official Journal C 199/27 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 199 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5727 June 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 199

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5727 June 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 199/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2014 to 31 May 2014(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 199/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2014 to 31 May 2014(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN