alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S  UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000927790
<NAME>                        Union Acceptance Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         141,318
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (814)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               316,988
<PP&E>                                         7,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,988)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 443,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,777
<BONDS>                                        334,811
<COMMON>                                       58,360
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     27,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   443,115
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,130
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0                 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               3,275                   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,220                
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,024)             
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,367)           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0                
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,657)                     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.43)
                                                
                                                

</TABLE>
## Oral Argument in Secretary of Labor v. AKM LLC d/b/a Volks Construction

**Oral Argument at OSHRC**

**WASHINGTON, D.C**.—On Tuesday, November 2, 2010 at 10:30 am, the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission will hear an Oral Argument in the case of *Secretary of Labor v. AKM LLC, dba Volks Constructors* (OSHRC Docket No. 06-1990). The argument will take place in the Review Commission's hearing room in Washington, D.C., located at One Lafayette Centre South – 1120 20th Street, NW on the 9th Floor.  The Review Commission is an independent Federal agency tasked with adjudicating disputes between the Department of Labor, employers, and employees arising from contested workplace safety inspections by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

The Oral Argument will address the issue of whether five items of a citation for recordkeeping violations are time barred under section 9(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.  Among other issues, the Commission will consider whether certain recordkeeping violations are “continuing violations.”  

The Secretary cited AKM on November 8, 2006 for alleged recordkeeping violations that spanned from 2002 to 2006.  The Chief Administrative Law Judge affirmed the violations and AKM appealed to the full Commission.  Each party will have 30 minutes to present its argument, and Counsel for the Respondent (AKM) will argue first, followed by  Counsel for the Secretary of Labor.

The briefs before the Commission in the case are available on the Commission’s website at https://www.oshrc.gov/foia/akm-llc-dba-volks-construction/.
http://av-info.faa.gov/sdrx/Query.aspx [11/15/2016 10:59:00 AM] Service Difficulty Report

1. Submitter Information

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (a) Unique Control #: SQP2011F00000 (b) Difficulty Date: 08/29/2011 (c) Registration # : 6993N (d) Submitter Type : E - CARRIER PART 135 (e) Submitter Designator: (f) Submission Date: 9/9/2011 7:40:19 AM

2. Codes

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (a) Operator Designator : SQPA (b) Operator Type : Air Carrier (c) JASC/ATA Code : 8530 (d) Stage of Operation : CL - CLIMB (e) How Discovered : O - Other (f) Nature of Condition : O - OTHER (g) Precautionary Procedures: A - UNSCHED LANDING (h) FAA Region : NM (i) District Office : 11

3. Major Equipment Identity

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |Manufacturer |Model |Serial Number |Total Time |Total Cycles (a) Aircraft |CESSNA |T210N |21063202 | | (b) Engine |CONT |TSIO520M |511407 | | (c) Propeller | | | | |

4. Problem Description

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PILOT REPORTED LOUD BANG ON CLIMBOUT. RETURNED WITHOUT INCIDENT TO FIELD. UPON EXAMINATION FOUND NR 4 CYLINDER HEAD SEPARATED FROM CYLINDER AT 5TH COOLING FIN ON HEAD. ENGINE TSO AND CYLINDER TSN 817.6 HRS. LAST COMPRESSION CHECK WAS AT 100 HR INSPECTION 19.2 HRS PRIOR WITH COMPRESSION 69/80.

5. Specific Part or Structure Causing Difficulty

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (a) Part Name : CYLINDER HEAD (b) Manufacturer's Name : (c) Part Number : AEC631397 (d) Serial Number : 4658905 (e) Part Condition: SEPARATED (f) Part/Defect Location: ENGINE (g) Total Time : 818 (h) Total Cycles : (i) Time Since :

6. Component/Assembly That Includes Defective Part

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (a) Component Name: (b) Manufacturer's Name : (c) Part Number : (d) Serial Number : (e) Model Number : (f) Location : (g) Total Time : (h) Total Cycles : (i) Time Since :

7. Structure Causing Difficulty

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (a) Body or Fuselage Station - From/At: To: (b) Water Line - From/At: To: (c) Crack Length : (d) Number of Cracks: (e) Stringer - From/At: To: (f) Butt Line - From/At: To: (g) Wing Station - From/At: To: (h) Structural Other: (i) Corrosion Level :

------------------------------------- End Of Report --------------------------------------
Scorr P. LEWIS 

slewis@andersonkreiger.com 

T: 617-621-6560 

F: 617-621-6660 

June 1, 2016 

ANDERSON 

KREIGER 

BY EMAIL AND US MAIL (9-AWA-AGC-Part-16@faa.gov) 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

AGC-600 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Re: Mark Smith, et al. v. City of Santa Monica, California, Docket No. 16-16-02 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

I have enclosed for filing a signed original and three copies of RESPONDENT'S ASSENTED-To 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME. One of the copies of this document is unbound, as specified in the 

Notice of Docketing and 14 C.F.R. § 16.13. 

K. Simon (by email and US mail) 

---------- -----------------

ANDERSON & KREIGER LLP ONE CANAL PARK, SUITE 200, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02141 617.621.6500 
BEFORE THE 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

MARK SMITH ET AL. 

Complainants, 

v. Docket No. 16-16-02 

CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA, 

Respondent. 

RESPONDENT'S ASSENTED-TO MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 

The Respondent, the City of Santa Monica (the "City"), moves to extend the time to 

answer the Complaint under 14 C.F.R. § 16.26 by eighteen days, from Monday, June 13, 2016 to 

Friday, July 1, 2016. In support of its motion, the City states as follows: 

1. On April 11, 2016, the City filed a Motion to Dismiss Part IV of the Complaint. 

On April 22, the Complainants filed an Answer to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. The FAA 

has not yet issued a decision on the Motion to Dismiss. 

2. Accordingly, under 14 C.F.R. §§ 16.26(4) and (5) the City's Answer to the 

Complaint is currently due on June 13, 2016. 

3. The City needs the additional time it now seeks to prepare its answer to the 

Complaint, and the Complainants will not be prejudiced by the proposed extension of time. 

4. Complainants' counsel has consented to this proposed extension of time. 
For these reasons, the City respectfully moves that the time to answer the Complaint be 

extended to July 1, 2016. 

Assented to by: 

MARK SMITH ET AL. 

Ric?!a~onK-. 

1700 Decker School Lane 

~~ Malibu, CA 90265 

310-503-7286 

rsimon3@verizon.net 

June 1, 2016 

slewis@andersonkreiger.com 

Marsha Moutrie 

City Attorney 

CITY OF SANTA MONICA 

1685 Main Street, Room 310 

Santa Monica, CA 90401 

Marsha.moutrie@smgov.net 

2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify in accordance with 14 CFR § 16.IS(a) that I have on this day served the 

foregoing Respondent's Assented-to Motion to Extend Time on the following persons at the 

fo11owing addresses by email and first-class mail: 

FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk 

AGC-600 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

9-A WA-AGC-Part-16@faa.gov 

3 

Richard K. Simon 

1700 Decker School Lane 

Malibu, CA 90265 

310-503-7286 

rsimon3@verizon.net
Exhibit 24.2

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS

WHEREAS, ALCAN INC., a Canadiancorporation (the "Company"), proposes shortly to file with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Actof 1934 as amended (the "Act"), the Annual Report on Form 10-Kpursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act.

WHEREAS, the undersigned is anOfficer and/or a Director of the Company as indicated below;

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersignedhereby constitutes and appoints R. Millington, D. McAusland and P. Chenard andeach of them, as attorneys for the undersigned and in the undersigned's name,place and stead, and in each of the undersigned's offices and capacities as anOfficer and/or a Director of the Company, to execute and file such AnnualReport on Form 10-K, hereby giving and granting to said attorneys full powerand authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoeverrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully, to allintents and purposes, as the undersigned might or could do if personallypresent at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying and confirming all that saidattorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be done, by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand this 11th day of March 2005. 

 

| Signed:   /s/ L. YvesFortier     Name:    L. Yves FortierTitle:       Director |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 112 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2018 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for an event to celebrate the birthday 

of King Kamehameha I. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO 

4 CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF KING KAMEHA5 MEHA I. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

7 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used for an 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 112 RDS 

1 event on June 10, 2018, to celebrate the birthday of King 

2 Kamehameha I. 

3 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

4 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 

5 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

6 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 9, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION 

36 CFR Ch. VIII 

Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions 

AGENCY: Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. 

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda. 

SUMMARY: The following Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regulations are scheduled for 

development. They are submitted herein for publication in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and 

Deregulatory Actions. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Advisory Council contact person for Unified Agenda 

matters is Javier E. Marques, Associate General Counsel, 202-517-0192, 401 F Street, NW., Suite 308, 

Washington, DC 20001. 

Dated: October 22, 2014. 

NAME: Javier Marques, 

Associate General Counsel. 

1

Regulations.gov Friday, November 21, 2014 Unified Agenda
The 1 Regulatory Agendas

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation - Proposed Rule

Title

Regulation 

Identifier

Number

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Freedom of Information Act Regulations Update 3010-AA07

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ( ACHP ) RIN: 3010-AA07

 View Related Documents

Title: Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Freedom of Information Act Regulations Update

Abstract: The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) is revising its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regulations,

36 CFR part 810, which were last updated in 1981, in order to comply with the 2007 Open Government Act, to reflect the

ACHP's business practices, and correct obsolete information.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 36 CFR 810 (Revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 5 USC 552, The Freedom of Information Act

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2014 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Javier E. Marques 

Associate General Counsel

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

401 F Street, NW., Suite 308, Washington, DC 20001-2637

Washington , DC 20001-2637 

Phone: 202 517-0192 

FAX: 202 517-6382

E-Mail: jmarques@achp.gov

2

Regulations.gov Friday, November 21, 2014 Unified Agenda
CHRISTOPHE R S
. BON D

MISSOUR I COMMITTEES : APPROPRIATION S 

### SMAL LBUSINES S "BU M ^tatC S ^1^1 1 ENVIRONMEN TAN D " " ' " ' - ' ":" ' "'"" " PUBLI C WORK S WASHINGTON , D C 20510-250 3 INTELLIGENC E Jun e 1,201 0 \• '" ' Denni s DeVany , Chie f EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Division Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jersey , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Dear Mr . DeVany , It ha s bee n brough t

t o my attentio n tha t

th e U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n recentl y receive dseveral proposal s fromdifferen t airline s t o provid e Essentia l Ai r Servic e t o th e Kirksvill e Regiona l Airport . Th e City o f

Kirksvill e an dmember s o f th e communit y hav e carefull y weighe deac h optio n an dth e impac t

eac hproposa l wil l hav e o n th e Kirksvill e community . In doin g so , the y hav e selecte daproposa l that wil l bes t servic e th e surroundin g communit y b y providin g several dail y flight s t o alarge r

airport o n aschedul e that

wil l allo w for

th e succes s o f

th e airline . Pleas e giv e th e Kirksvill e City Counci l recommendatio n full an dfavorabl e consideratio n whe n reviewin g Essentia l Ai r Servic e for

th e community .

Cnrisfophe r

S . Bon d
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: S. Michele Manning

Page 1 of 1

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT – 97

June 23, 1988

Sally Just 

Pennsylvania DER, Office of Policy 

Fulton Bldg., 2nd Floor 

P.O. Box 2063 

Harrisburg, PA 17120

TOPIC: DEFINITION OF "PERENNIAL STREAM"

INQUIRY: Please search the Federal Register and selected state regulations for the definitions 

of "perennial stream."

SEARCH RESULTS: The federal regulation defining the term "perennial stream" is found at 

30 CFR Sec. 701.5, and reads as follows: Perennial stream "means a stream or part of a stream 

that flows continuously during all of the calendar year as a result of ground-water discharge or 

surface runoff". The term does not include "intermittent stream" or "ephemeral stream."

This definition has not been revised or amended since its promulgation in 1979. In the preamble 

to the 1979 final regulations, OSM noted that this definition was based on a definition of the 

term which was contained in a 1960 U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper. No comments 

were received on this regulation, which was adopted as proposed. (44 FR 14,932 (1979)). 

Of the six states which were researched, four (Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, and Virginia) 

contained a definition of "perennial stream" that is identical to that found in the federal 

regulations. Ohio's definition differed from the others in that the phrase "or part of a stream" was 

omitted; otherwise, Ohio's definition was identical to that used by OSMRE. 

West Virginia’s definition differs from the OSMRE definition, in that it makes no reference to a 

flow during "a calendar year" or to "surface runoff" of "ground water discharge". That state’s

definition of "perennial streams" reads: "a stream or portion of a stream that flows continuously." 

ATTACHMENTS

A. 44 FR 14, 932 (1979). 

B. 405 KAR 7:020, Sec. 1 (1986). 

C. 310 IAC 12-1-3 (1986). 

D. Illinois Surface Coal Mining Regs., Sec. 1701.5 (1982). 

E. Virginia Coal Surface Mining Reclamation Regs. Sec. 480-03-19. 700.5 (1986). 

F. Ohio Admin Code Sec. 1501:13-1-02 (1987). 

G. West Virginia Surface Mining Reclamation Regs. Sec. 2 (1983).
#### In the Matter of Diane H., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Julie H., Appellant; Matthew H., Sr., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Missy H., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Julie H., Appellant; Matthew H., Sr., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Alexya H., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Julie H., Appellant; Matthew H., Sr., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 3.) In the Matter of Jose H., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Adminis*771tration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Julie H., Appellant; Matthew H., Sr., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 4.) In the Matter of Sylena H., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Julie H., Appellant; Matthew H., Sr., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 5.) In the Matter of Matthew H., Jr., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Julie H., Appellant; Matthew H., Sr., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 6.)

[773 NYS2d 613]

—In related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Richmond County (Porzio, J.), dated March 25, 2002, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, inter alia, found that she abused the subject children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother’s contention that the Family Court should have adjourned the instant proceedings in light of a related criminal proceeding that was pending against her is unpreserved for appellate review (see *Matter of Kenny C.,*245 AD2d 32 [1997]), and in any event, is without merit (see *Matter of Derra G.,*232 AD2d 211 [1996]; *Matter of New York City Commr. of Social Servs. [Jason C.] v Elminia E.,*134 AD2d 501 [1987]; *Matter of Germaine B.,*86 AD2d 847, 848 [1982]). Prudenti, P.J., Goldstein, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter  ended  September  30,  2003  (the  "Report")  by  Intervest  Bancshares
Corporation  (the  "Company"),  the  undersigned, as the principal executive and
principal  financial  officer  of  the  Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that,  to  my  knowledge:

(1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Lowell  S.  Dansker
------------------------
Lowell  S.  Dansker,  Vice  Chairman,  President  and  Treasurer
(Principal  Executive  and  Financial  Officer)
November  12,  2003


<PAGE>
Exhibit 23(1)
-------------

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-77318) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Award and Incentive Plan of
American Biltrite Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84667)
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Award and Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as
of March 4, 1997 of American Biltrite Inc., and the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-84669) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors of American Biltrite Inc., of our report dated March 1, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of American
Biltrite Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2001.


                                                   /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 2002


                                       77