alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 06-0262 262/265 Focus Ready Draft 2/9/2006

ENGINEER: Hall \ AMO PV (kg/yr): 200,000 YX

SUBMITTER: Champion Technologies

USE: Chemical intermediate for a hydrate inhibi tor for oil and gas wells, production pipelines and

flowlines.

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Respirator:

Health Effects:

TLV/PEL:

CRSS (02/06/2006):

Chemical Name: Consolidated Set S-H20: 0.00001 g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @

MW: 368.65 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (02/07/2006): Migration to groundw ater: Negligible PBT rating: P1B1T2 Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation, XB Testing (Testing desired) Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water), XB Testing (Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. This IRER is for th e consolidated set of chemicals P06-0262/265. The production volume for each chemical is 200,000 kg/yr and all estimates are for each PMN (not a combination). Physical properties and SAT ratings are the same

for both chemicals unless otherwis e noted in the IRER. These cas es are intermediates for P06- 0263/264/266/267. A separate IRER has been complete d for these chemicals. Any changes to this IRER may effect the other IRER. The PMNs are site-limited intermediates. The media of releasefor equipment cleaning release was uncertain in and deepwell injection in and . Additional submitter information on potential media of release was used for this IRER.POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: Yes (0 criteria met)

1) # of workers exposed: 7 >1000? No 2) >100 workers with >10 mg/day inhalation exposure: No 3) (a) >100 workers w/1-10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100 days/yr: No (b) Routine Dermal Cont: > 250 workers & >100 days/yr: NoINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 06-0262 262/265

MFG: Batch Process Manufacturing

Number of Sites/ Location: 1 Corsicana Technologies Corsicana TX 75110 Days/yr: 7

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASE S ESTIMATE SUMMARY Air - negligible (VP<0.001 torr)| Land - not required, per SAT.

Water or Incineration Conservative: 2.9E+2 kg/site-day over 1 day/yr from 1 site or 2.9E+2 kg/yr to: Water, Incineration,

from:

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL 2.9E+2 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers expose d via assessed routes:

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 06-0262 262/265

USE: Intermediate for P06-0263/264/266/267

Number of Sites/ Location: 1 Corsicana Technologies Corsicana TX 75110 Days/yr: 94

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASE S ESTIMATE SUMMARY Air - negligible (VP<0.001 torr)| Land - not required, per SAT

Water or Incineration High End: 4.3E+0 kg/site-day over 94 days/yr from 1 site or 4.0E+2 kg/yr

to: Incineration or Water

from:

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL 4.0E+2 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers expose d via assessed routes:

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10617

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

ISAAC LEVELL TAYLOR,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:18-CR-114-1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Isaac Levell Taylor

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Taylor has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 17, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10617 Document: 00515276266 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/17/2020
No. 19-10617

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-10617 Document: 00515276266 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/17/2020
Exhibit 31.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Jeffrey A. Mason, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Featherlite, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. Mason   
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
### 1

From: "Palazzolo, Michael A." <Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/05/2011 03:06 PM

Subject: RE: Lake Charles Carbon Plant

- Paste Plant Mixer Type



### Rochelle,

Lake Charles’ paste plant has a continuous mixer.

Mike

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 2:53 PM

To: Palazzolo, Michael A.

Subject: RE: Lake Charles Carbon Plant

- Paste Plant Mixer Type

Ok Thanks.

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243

- 02

Ph: (919) 541

- 1390 Fax: (919) 541

- 3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov

From: "Palazzolo, Michael A." <Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/05/2011 02:49 PM

Subject: RE: Lake Charles Carbon Plant

- Paste P lant Mixer Type



### Rochelle,

I asked that question but h ave no reply yet. I will check in again.

Mike

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 2:21 PM

To: Palazzolo, Michael A.

Subject: Fw: Lake Charles Carbon Plant

- Paste Plant Mixer Type

Mike, do you know if that process is batch or continuous?

### 2

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Po licies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243

- 02

Ph: (919) 541

- 1390 Fax: (919) 541

- 3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/05/2011 02:20 PM

-----

From: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com

Date: 12/28/2010 09:55 AM

Subject: Lake Charles Carbon Plant

- Paste Plant Mixer Type

In our calculations for allowable paste plant emissions we were going to use the limit for batch mixers but

I figured I would just check to see if you have a continuous or batch paste plant production process so

that we can have an accurate allowable calculation for Lake Charles?

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 2 7711

Mail Drop D243

- 02

Ph: (919) 541

- 1390 Fax: (919) 541

- 3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136563 & (11) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136563 

 COA: 283491 
 Wayne CC: 90-008948-01

MARVIN K. LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. 

s1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTACCOUNTANTS**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.2‐78713, 333-83336, 333-105999 and 333-110739) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-89711and 333-111555, 333-124528 and 333-128710) of Alcan Inc., of our reports dated 8March 2006 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, and our Comments by Auditors forU.S. Readers on Canada‐U.S. Reporting Differences dated 8 March 2006, whichappear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by referencein this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us underthe heading "Controls and Procedures" in this Form 10-K.

|  
		 
** **
		 
		 
		 
		 
		 
		 
Montreal, Canada
		 
		 
8 March		2006
		 
/s/		PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
		 
		 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 192 (Tuesday, December 30, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1333]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
  No committee meetings were held.
```
# Official Journal C 103/27 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 103 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5827 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 103

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5827 March 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2015/C 103/01 | Sixteenth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2015/C 103/01

Sixteenth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Opinion issued August 10, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00147-CV

———————————

RICHARD STILLWELL A/K/A WILBERT RICHARD STILLWELL, 

Appellant

V.

NORTH EAST PINE VILLAGE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION D/B/A 

PINE VILLAGE NORTH ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2016-74522

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Richard Stillwell, also known as Wilbert Richard Stillwell, has

neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See

TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 
2

§§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, 

in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on 

Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On 

March 21, 2023, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if 

appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by April 20, 2023. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the 

preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On April 12, 2023, 

appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not 

submit written evidence that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the 

preparation of the clerk’s record by May 12, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

Appellant did not adequately respond. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and 

want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.
#### Samuel Strudwick and others *v.*Pasquale Paoli Ashe and Wife.

1 V. From New-Hanover. j

A man dies seised of lands situate in two counties. The lands in one county are partitioned among the heirs at law, by commissioners appointed by the County Court, agreeably to the provisions of the act of 1787, ch. 17. This partition does not preclude the Court of Equity from decreeing a sale of the lands situate in the other county, if it appear to the Court that partition cannot be made of the lands without injury to the parties interested.

This was a petition filed in the Court of Equity for New-Hanover County, under the act of 1812, ch. 25, which gives to the Courts of Equity power to decree the sale of lands, where it shall, appear that an actual partition cannot be made without injury to some, or all, of the parties interested. Samuel Strudwick, the elder, died in July, 1810, seised of real estates situate in the counties of Orange and New-Hanover. The petitioners, and Elizabeth, wife of P. P. Ashe, were his heirs at law. Partition had been made of the real estates in Orange, by commissioners appointed for that purpose, agreeably to the provisions of the act of 1787, ch. 17. This petition was filed, praying for an order to sell the real estates in New-Hanover, upon the ground that they could not be partitioned without injury to the parties interested. It appeared to the satisfaction of the Court, not only by sundry affidavits appended to the petition, but also by the finding of a Jury, that partition of the real estates described in the petition could not be made without injury to the parties interested j but, as part of the lands descended frora William Strudwick had been partitioned, and those described in the petition had not then been taken into view *208by the commissioners, so as to enable the Court to decide, whether, if *all*the lands descended had been taken into view by the commissioners, partition could not have been made without injury to any of the parties, the Court doubted whether the case of the petitioners came within the purview and meaning of the act of 1812, ch. 25, and sent the case to this Court.

By the Court.

The verdict of the Jury is, that th© lands cannot be divided without great injury to the petitioners, and that a sale would be greatly to their interest. This brings the case completely within the act of 1812, ch. 25, which authorises the Court to make an order of sale in all cases where an actual partition cannot be made without injury to some one, or all, of the parties interested. That the lands in Orange have been divided, makes no change in the power of the Court as to those now in question.
Exhibit 21 - Subsidiary List
                       List of Subsidiaries of AT&T Corp.
                                  As of 3/29/01

                                                Jurisdiction of Incorporation

ACC Corp.................................................Delaware
Alascom, Inc.............................................Alaska
AT&T Communications, Inc.................................Delaware
AT&T Communications of California, Inc...................California
AT&T Communications of Delaware, Inc.....................Delaware
AT&T Communications of Hawaii, Inc.......................Hawaii
AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc.....................Illinois
AT&T Communications of Indiana, Inc......................Indiana
AT&T Communications of Maryland, Inc.....................Maryland
AT&T Communications of Michigan, Inc.....................Michigan
AT&T Communications of the Midwest, Inc..................Iowa
AT&T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc..........Colorado
AT&T Communications of Nevada, Inc.......................Nevada
AT&T Communications of New England, Inc..................New York
AT&T Communications of New Hampshire, Inc................New Hampshire
AT&T Communications of New Jersey, Inc...................New Jersey
AT&T Communications of New York, Inc.....................New York
AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc.........................Ohio
AT&T Communications of the Pacific Northwest, Inc........Washington
AT&T Communications of Pennsylvania, Inc.................Pennsylvania
AT&T Communications of the South Central States, Inc.....Delaware
AT&T Communications of the Southern States, Inc..........New York
AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc................Delaware
AT&T Communications of Virginia, Inc.....................Virginia
AT&T Communications of Washington D.C., Inc..............New York
AT&T Communications of West Virginia, Inc................West Virginia
AT&T Communications of Wisconsin, Inc....................Wisconsin
AT&T Communications Services International Inc...........Delaware
AT&T Global Communications Services Inc..................Delaware
AT&T Solutions Inc.......................................Delaware
AT&T Global Network Services Inc.........................Delaware
AT&T of Puerto Rico, Inc.................................New York
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc..............................Delaware
Teleport Communications Group Inc........................Delaware
AT&T Broadband LLC ......................................Delaware
MediaOne Group, Inc. ....................................Delaware
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 61378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24909]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, October 11, 2012, 1:15 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave. SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT: Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. At the meeting, the BBG will 
recognize the David Burke Distinguished Journalism Awards winners. The 
BBG will receive and consider proposed BBG meeting dates in 2013 and 
consider a resolution honoring an employee for his service. The BBG 
will recognize the anniversaries of Agency language services, receive a 
Middle East trip report, receive a distribution/technology initiatives 
update, receive a budget update, and receive reports from the 
International Broadcasting Bureau Director, the Technology, Services 
and Innovation Director, the Communications and External Affairs 
Director, the VOA Director, the Office of Cuba Broadcasting Director, 
and the Presidents of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, 
and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks.
    The public may attend this meeting in person at BBG headquarters in 
DC as seating capacity allows. Member of the public seeking to attend 
the meeting in person must register at http://bbgboardmeetingoct2012.eventbrite.com by 12 p.m. (EDT) on October 10. 
For more information, please contact BBG Public Affairs at (202) 203-
4400 or by email at pubaff@bbg.gov. This meeting will also be available 
for public observation via streamed webcast, both live and on-demand, 
on the BBG's public Web site at www.bbg.gov. The public is advised to 
check the Web site for updated information on the starting time of the 
meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-24909 Filed 10-4-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```