alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United Stat es District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-1476

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Timothy C. Washington, etc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 27, 2006 Filed: January 10, 2007

___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Timothy Washington appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion cha llenging a 2001 order denying 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief. As the district court conclude d--and contrary to Washington’s position--his motion was in reality a successive secti on 2255 motion filed without authorization. Cf. Gonzalez v. Crosby , 125 S. Ct. 2641, 2647-48 (2005) (Rule 60(b) motion should not be treated as successive habeas motio n if it attacks district court’s previous resolution of claim on procedural grounds); United States v. Patton , 309 F.3d 1093,-2- 1094 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (inmates may not bypass authorization requirement of § 2255 by purporting to invoke some other procedure). Thus, dismissal was proper. SeeBoyd v. United States , 304 F.3d 813, 814 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### Majestic Realty Corporation, Appellant, vs. City of Milwaukee and others, Respondents.

*February 10*

March *7, 1933.*

For the appellant there were briefs by *Walter J. Matti-son,*attorney, and *Gold & McCann, Walter D. Corrigan, Sr.,*and *August C. Backus*of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Mattison, Mr. J. E. Porter, Mr. Corrigan, Mr. Walter L. Gold,*and *Mr. Backus,*all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Max Raskin,*city attorney, *William F. Quick,*first assistant city attorney, *Herbert C. Hirschboeck*and *H. A. Kovenock,*assistant city attorneys, and oral argument by *Mr. Quick, Mr. Hirsch-boeck,*and *Mr. Kovenock.*

Fowler, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *Schlitz Realty Corporation v. City of Milwaukee, ante,*p. 62, 247 N. W. 459, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Court.-*— The judgment and orders of the circuit court are affirmed.
# Official Journal L 429/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 429 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6318 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 429

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6318 December 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1989 of 6 November 2020 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 as regards the 2020 update of the taxonomy laid down in the regulatory technical standards for the single electronic reporting format (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1989 of 6 November 2020 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 as regards the 2020 update of the taxonomy laid down in the regulatory technical standards for the single electronic reporting format (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
|   | 1. | Extension of Term.  The term of the Personal Services Agreement is renewed until the earlier of (a) the effective date of a plan of reorganization for Congoleum Corporation, et al., following a final order of confirmation, or (b) June 30, 2010. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Ratification.  Each of ABI and Congoleum hereby ratifies and confirms all of the terms and provisions of the Personal Services Agreement, as amended hereby. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Counterparts.  This Amendment to Personal Services Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original but all of which shall collectively constitute a single instrument. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | AMERICAN BILTRITE INC.  |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   |                         |   |
|   | By:                     |
|   | /s/Richard G. Marcus    |
|   | Name:                   | Richard G. Marcus  |
|   | Title:                  | President  |
|   |                         |   |
|   | CONGOLEUM CORPORATION   |
|   | By:                     |
|   | /s/Roger S. Marcus      |
|   | Name:                   | Roger S. Marcus  |
|   | Title:                  | Chief Executive Officer  |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10860]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         SENATE BILLS REFERRED

  Bills of the Senate of the following titles were taken from the 
Speaker's table and, under the rule, referred as follows:

       S. 3663. An act to provide for the short-term partial 
     extension of analog broadcasting; to the Committee on Energy 
     and Commerce.
       S. 3681. An act to designate the facility of the United 
     States Postal Service located at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in 
     Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Joseph A. Ryan Post Office 
     Building''; to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
     Reform.
       S. 3711. An act to authorize a cost of living adjustment 
     for the Federal judiciary; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
       S. 3712. An act to make a technical correction in the Paul 
     Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and 
     Addiction Equity Act of 2008; to the Committee on Energy and 
     Commerce; in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor 
     for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
     each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 
     the jurisdiction of the committee concerned; in addition to 
     the Committee on Ways and Means for a period to be 
     subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
     consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
     jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

                          ____________________
```
INSPECTION REPORT AOT A53W001‐12 ‐ Appendix 3

• A/C MSN:• Flight cycles:

• Flight hours:

• Date of inspection: inspection:

Frame 

41LH42LH

43LH44LH45LH46LH

41RH

42RH43RH44RH45RH46RH
<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit 31.2


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER I, Ernst Luebke, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Mymetics Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 11, 2007          By: /s/ Ernst Luebke
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                Principal financial and chief accounting officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Sento Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick F. O' Neal, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/
Patrick F. O' Neal

Patrick
F. O' Neal
President and Chief Executive Officer
June 28, 2005

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic
version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

RESPODENT

v.

VONDA KAY BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 133 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 91473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26900]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12587]

Notice of Determinations; Additional Culturally Significant 
Objects Being Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Finding Light 
in the Darkness'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: On June 19, 2019, notice was published in the Federal Register 
of determinations pertaining to certain objects to be included in an 
exhibition entitled ``Finding Light in the Darkness.'' Notice is hereby 
given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain 
additional objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement 
with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the 
aforesaid exhibition at the Holocaust Center for Humanity, Seattle, 
Washington, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021. The notice of determinations published on June 19, 2019, appears 
at 84 FR 28611.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-26900 Filed 11-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
-  Resources 
          A-Z Index
Annual Reports
Budget and Planning
Careers at OSMRE
Coalex Reports
Education & Outreach
FAQs
Federal Assistance Manual
Forms
Glossary
Grants
Reclamation Bonds
Sustainability
Tribal Consultation
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy

# Forms, Applications, and Instructions

This site provides the most current official version of forms, applications, and instructions. We are linking you directly to the websites of the originators of the forms. This site links to the following form libraries: Department of the Interior; Office of Personnel Management; General Services Administration, and other forms.
ALLEN ORGAN COMPANY

Exhibit 32

                 Section 1350 Certifications


In connection with the Annual Report of Allen Organ Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), we certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and
2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and result
  of operations of the Company.


Date: March 26, 2004



/s/STEVEN MARKOWITZ             /s/NATHAN S. ECKHART
Steven Markowitz                Nathan S. Eckhart
Chief Executive Officer         Chief Financial Officer
#### JAMES I MOORE and others v. RICHARD D. JONES and others.

*Mandamus*— *Canvass of Votes*— *Restraining Order.*

When a mandamus is granted to compel a re-canvass of election returns'. bjr a Board of County Commissioners, *Held,*not to be error to grant at-the same time an order restraining- the persons declared elected upon the first canvass from exercising the duties of their offices.

Appeal from a Restraining Order made at Chambers in Franklin ton on the 14th day of December, 1876, by *Watts, X*

Thq defendant Cómmissioners declared the defendant James B. Crews elected Sheriff of Granville ( ounty at an election held on the 7th day of November, 1876, and the defendants James B Hobgood, John Morgan and Elijah C.. Montague, each elected to the office of *(*ounty ('ommissioner at said election.

Upon application of the plaintiffs an order was issued restraining and enjoining said defendants declared elected as-aforesaid, from qualifying or in any way attempting to hold said offices, or to perform any of the duties incident thereto.

The facts stated in the preceding case are applicable to-this. Defendants appealed.

*Messrs. Merrimon, Fuller $ Ashe*and *T. B.*Venable, for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. L. C. Edwards*and *J. B Batchelor*for defendants.

PearsoN, C. J.

The decision in respect t.o the ‘‘Board of' ■Commissioners,” leaves but little that need be said in respect-to these defendants.

The Board of Commissioners certified that these persons-were elected. This certificate was superseded by the writ *189of mandamus, “ *per se,”*from the nature of the thing, the one being a mere sequence of the other; that is, the certificate owed its vitality to the action of the Board, which the mandamus vacated, and of course was vacated with it.

It follows, that if these parties had presumed to exercise the duties of their offices,- after notice of the writ of mandamus, they would have been in contempt for a defiance of what has been termed “ the grand prerogative writ ” of mandamus.

This being so, the fact that they are included in the summons and that the complaint asks for a restraining order and injunction, and the fact that such orders were made, were mere matters of supererogation and could do no harm.

We are of opinion that there is no error in the ruling of His Honor, of which the defendants have a right to complain.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
exv10w25







EXHIBIT 10.25




Annual Cash Compensation of Named Executive Officers



The executive officers named in the compensation table in Monsanto’s proxy statement dated Dec. 7,
2009 (the “Named Executive Officers”) have their base salaries determined yearly by the People and
Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors. It is anticipated that such
determinations will occur annually, effective during a pay period in the following January. The
Named Executive Officers are all “at will” employees, and do not have written or oral employment
agreements other than change of control agreements, the form of which is filed, as required, as an
exhibit to reports filed by the Company under the Exchange Act. The Company, upon the approval of
the Committee, retains the right to unilaterally decrease or increase the Named Executive Officers’
base salaries at any time.



The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s annual incentive
compensation plans for all regular employees, including executive officers, which provide for cash
awards. Summaries of such annual incentive compensation plans are filed as exhibits, as required,
to reports filed by the Company under the Exchange Act.



On Oct. 25, 2010, the Committee approved for the Company’s Named Executive Officers,
(i) the following base salaries to become effective as of Jan. 10, 2011, and (ii) no annual incentive awards for the 2010
fiscal year.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Base Salary	 	Base Salary	 	FY 2010 Annual
	Named Executive Officer	 	(as of 01/11/10)	 	  (as of 1/10/11)  	 	    Incentive Award    
	Hugh Grant

Chairman of the Board, President

and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	1,403,780	 	 	$	1,403,780	 	 	$	 —	 
	Carl M. Casale

Executive V.P. and

Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	590,000	 	 	$	602,000	 	 	$	 —	 
	Brett D. Begemann

Executive Vice President, Seeds & Traits
	 	$	540,000	 	 	$	551,000	 	 	$	 —	 
	Robert T. Fraley, Ph.D.

Executive V.P. and Chief

Technology Officer
	 	$	600,000	 	 	$	612,000	 	 	$	 —	 






The Company intends to provide additional information regarding other compensation awarded to the
Named Executive Officers in respect of and during the 2010 fiscal year in the proxy statement for
its 2011 annual meeting of shareowners, which proxy statement is expected to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in December 2010.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          15,706
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,232)
<INVENTORY>                                     70,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,814
<PP&E>                                          98,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,912)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 363,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,443
<BONDS>                                         47,058
<COMMON>                                        29,595
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   363,565
<SALES>                                        315,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,377
<CGS>                                        (196,119)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (196,119)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (69,540)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (80)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,821)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (19,270)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,520
<DISCONTINUED>                                   7,119
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
        

</TABLE>
## Schaad Detective Agency

**Secretary of Labor v. Schaad Detective Agency, Inc.**

 

**OSHRC Docket 16-1628**

 

Secretary’s PDR (Dec. 10, 2018)

 

Last Updated: January 4, 2019