alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10 (x)


                              THE ALLEN GROUP INC.

                         Key Employee Severance Policy
                                Amendment No. 2


         The second sentence of the first paragraph of The Allen Group Inc. Key
Employee Severance Policy is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to
read as follows:

                 "For purposes of this Policy, a key employee shall be any
                 employee of the Company (other than any employee of one of the
                 Company's foreign subsidiaries) who holds or at any time held
                 stock options granted under the Company's 1982 Stock Plan,
                 1992 Stock Plan, or any successor plan thereto, or any
                 employee of the Company designated by the Management
                 Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
                 Company, unless any such employee is covered by an employment
                 or severance agreement with the Company or, as an employee of
                 the Company or one of its domestic subsidiaries, is eligible
                 to receive severance under the laws or general business
                 practices of any foreign country."


February, 1996
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 78 DB 2022 (No. 40 RST 2022)

:

ASHLEY MARIE ALTOMARE : Attorney Registration No. 208051

: 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Chester County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4

th day of August, 2022, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated July 28, 2022, is approved and it is ORDERED that

ASHLEY MARIE ALTOMARE, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that 

she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission 

to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a 

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the 

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-51969 and 333-75946) and on the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-58951, 33-53499, 33-53487, 33-52420,
33-8658 (Amendment No. 1), 2-99919, 333-51739, 333-68369 and 333-80913) of Allen
Telecom Inc. of our report dated February 13, 2002, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



Cleveland, Ohio
February 28, 2002
**Exhibit 32**Certificationof the Principal Executive OfficersPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)We, Morris H. Wheeler, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Robert W. Pawlak, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Cohesant Inc. (the “Company”), certify that to the best of our knowledge,based upon a review of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February29, 2008 (the “Report”): (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        /s/ Morris H. Wheeler   Morris H. Wheeler   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   April 11, 2008        /s/ Robert W. Pawlak   Robert W. Pawlak   Chief Financial Officer   April 11, 2008
Exhibit 32.2



Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentleman:



In connection with the quarterly report of Featherlite, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jeffery A. Mason, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|August 12, 2005 |  | /s/ Jeffery A. Mason   
|                |  | Chief Financial Officer
## open government

Decision Search

OSHRC Open Government Plan

ALJ Decisions Pending Commission Review

Commission Briefing NoticesCommissioners' Monthly Case Activity ReportCommissioners' Monthly Docket ReportListing of New Cases Received

Plain WritingSignificant Orders - Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)Significant Orders - Commission

Vulnerability Disclosure Policy

opengov@oshrc.gov
# Official Journal C 377/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 377 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 626 November 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 377

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 626 November 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 377/01 | Statutes of the European Research Infrastructure for Imaging Technologies in Biological and Biomedical Sciences — Euro-BioImaging European Research Infrastructure Consortium (Euro-BioImaging ERIC) Euro-BioImaging ERIC Statutes | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 377/01

Statutes of the European Research Infrastructure for Imaging Technologies in Biological and Biomedical Sciences — Euro-BioImaging European Research Infrastructure Consortium (Euro-BioImaging ERIC) Euro-BioImaging ERIC Statutes

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24
                                                  

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     WHEREAS, ALLIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (herein
referred to as the "Company"), is about to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and

     WHEREAS, each of the undersigned holds the office or offices in the Company
hereinbelow set opposite his name, respectively;

     NOW THEREFORE, each of the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints
KENNETH B. LIGHT and DAVID B. CORWINE, and each of them individually, his
attorney, with full power to act for him and in his name, place and stead, to
sign his name in the capacity or capacities set forth below to said Form 10-K
and to any and all amendments thereto, and hereby ratifies and confirms all said
attorney may or shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 12th
day of March, 1997.

     Richard A. Drexler, Chairman of
      the Board, President and Chief               /s/Richard A. Drexler    
      Executive Officer; Director                 ---------------------------
     
     Kenneth B. Light, Executive Vice
      President and Chief Financial                /s/Kenneth B. Light      
      Officer, Chief Administrative               ---------------------------
      Officer, Director

     Robert J. Fleck, Vice President -
      Accounting and Chief Accounting              /s/Robert J. Fleck         
      Officer                                     ---------------------------

     Lloyd A. Drexler, Director                    /s/Lloyd A. Drexler       
                                                  ---------------------------

     William D. Fischer, Director                  /s/William D. Fischer     
                                                  ---------------------------

     Stanley J. Goldring, Director                 /s/Stanley J. Goldring    
                                                  ---------------------------

<PAGE>

        
     John E. Jones, Director                       /s/John E. Jones         
                                                  ---------------------------

     John W. Puth, Director                        /s/John W. Puth          
                                                  ---------------------------

     Mitchell I. Quain, Director                   /s/Mitchell I. Quain     
                                                  ---------------------------

     S. S. Sherman, Director                       /s/S. S. Sherman        
                                                  ---------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 145 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 145

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
 Treasury relating to ``Returns by Exempt Organizations and Returns by 
                  Certain Non-Exempt Organizations''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2018

Mr. Price of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. Schakowsky, 
 Mr. Pocan, Ms. Jayapal, and Mr. Deutch) submitted the following joint 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
 Treasury relating to ``Returns by Exempt Organizations and Returns by 
                  Certain Non-Exempt Organizations''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury relating to ``Returns 
by Exempt Organizations and Returns by Certain Non-Exempt 
Organizations'' (Rev. Proc. 2018-38 (July 16, 2018)), received in the 
House of Representatives on July 26, 2018, and received in the Senate 
on July 30, 2018, and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Research conducted by: Mary Kay Roark Page 1 of 1

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 14

August 13, 1984

James Hamilton

Deputy Commissioner

Division of Mined Land Reclamation

P.O. Drawer U

Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219

TOPIC: SELF-BONDING

INQUIRY: Identify all states that have a self-bonding provision in their regulatory program.

SEARCH RESULTS:

A search of COALEX was conducted. Sixteen states, in addition to Virginia, were identified as 

having the self-bonding provision. Excerpts from the 16 states' programs are attached.

ATTACHMENTS:

Excerpts citing the self-bonding provision from the state regulatory programs are enclosed for 

the following states:

 Alabama

 Arkansas

 Colorado

 Illinois

 Iowa

 Kentucky

 Louisiana

 Mississippi

 New Mexico

 North Dakota

 Ohio

 Oklahoma

 Pennsylvania

 Texas

 West Virginia

 Wyoming
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 101 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct reviews 

of certain budget requests of the President for the medical care accounts 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

conduct reviews of certain budget requests of the President for the medical care accounts of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Healthcare 

5 Improvement Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 101 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT 

2 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CARE 

3 BUDGET SUBMISSIONS. 

4 Section 4 of the Veterans Health Care Budget Re5 form and Transparency Act of 2009 (Public Law 111– 

6 81; 38 U.S.C. 117 note) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 4. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF DEPART8 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CARE 

9 BUDGET SUBMISSION. 

10 ‘‘(a) REVIEW OF BUDGET SUBMISSION; REPORTS.— 

11 For each of fiscal years 2018, 2019, and 2020, the Comp12 troller General of the United States shall— 

13 ‘‘(1) review the budget requests for the medical 

14 care accounts of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

15 in the budget request of the President submitted 

16 pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States 

17 Code; and 

18 ‘‘(2) submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Af19 fairs, Appropriations, and the Budget of the Senate 

20 and the House of Representatives a report or re21 ports on the results of each such review. 

22 ‘‘(b) TIMING AND SCOPE OF REPORTS.—In deter23 mining the timing and scope for the submittal of the re24 port or reports required under subsection (a), the Comp25 troller General shall consult with the Committees on VetVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:52 Jan 07, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H101.IH H101

smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 101 IH

1 erans’ Affairs of the Senate and the House of Representa2 tives. 

3 ‘‘(c) MEDICAL CARE ACCOUNTS.—In this section, the 

4 term ‘medical care accounts of the Department of Vet5 erans Affairs’ means the following medical care accounts 

6 of the Veterans Health Administration, Department of 

7 Veterans Affairs account: 

8 ‘‘(1) Medical Services. 

9 ‘‘(2) Medical Support and Compliance. 

10 ‘‘(3) Medical Facilities.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E50]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             KIDNEY DISEASE EDUCATION BENEFITS ACT OF 2009

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. MARK STEVEN KIRK

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, January 8, 2009

  Mr. KIRK. Madam Speaker, today, I am introducing the Kidney Disease 
Education Benefits Act. As co-Chairman of the Congressional Kidney 
Caucus, I am proud to join with my fellow Kidney Caucus co-Chairman, 
Congressman Jim McDermott (D-WA) to introduce this important 
initiative.
  Each year, some 80,000 people are diagnosed with End-Stage Renal 
Disease. This stage of kidney disease occurs when the kidneys function 
at less than 10 percent and, as a result, are no longer able to 
maintain life. Patients with kidney disease require regular kidney 
dialysis treatments or a transplant to survive. Medicare pays for most 
renal patients at the cost of $20 billion a year, nearly 7 percent of 
all Medicare expenditures, despite the fact that the kidney disease 
population represents just 1.1 percent of all Medicare patients.
  Complications associated with kidney disease are common, but can be 
reduced if appropriate education is provided prior to the onset of 
renal failure. There are a number of steps chronic kidney disease 
patients can take to reduce renal failure and better prepare themselves 
for dialysis, including making lifestyle changes, learning about renal 
replacement options, and seeking a compatible kidney donor. Medicare, 
however, does not provide coverage for education on nutrition, 
treatment options, venous access, or transplant coordination until 
after the patient has experienced kidney failure and is already 
undergoing dialysis.
  To remedy this situation, we are introducing the Kidney Disease 
Education Benefits Act of 2009 to make counseling available to patients 
before they begin dialysis. This is a top National Kidney Foundation 
legislative priority. Our bill would provide reimbursement for an 
estimated $10 million per year for up to six educational sessions for 
Medicare patients. These sessions would be offered one year prior to 
kidney failure to help prevent renal failure, better prepare these 
patients for dialysis, and save Medicare costs that can be associated 
with complications resulting from renal failure.
  Kidney disease cannot be reversed, but, with appropriate education, 
its effects can be slowed, improving the quality of life for renal 
patients and reducing costs to taxpayers. I would like to thank 
Congressman McDermott for joining me in the fight against kidney 
disease. I look forward to working with him and my other colleagues on 
this important initiative.

                          ____________________
```
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1415/2005

of 26 August 2005         

establishing a prohibition of fishing for ling in ICES zones I, II in (Community waters and International waters), by vessels flying the flag of Germany

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy (1), and in particular Article 26(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to common fisheries policy (2), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2005 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.

Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. It shall be prohibited to retain on board, tranship or land such stock caught by those vessels after that date.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 August 2005.

For the Commission

Jörgen HOLMQUIST            

Director-General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs

----

(1)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 59.

(2)OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 (OJ L 128, 21.05.2005, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 12, 14.01.2005, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/2005 (OJ L 207, 10.08.2005, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheet at October 31, 1997 and the unaudited
condensed statement of operations for the nine months ended October 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      924
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,242
<PP&E>                                         777,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,002,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,002,964
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   571
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,595
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,595
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (94,580)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,985)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Hruzek, Respondent, vs. Old Line Life Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

*February 4*

April *28, 1936.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Olwell & Brady*and *George A. Gessner,*all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Gessner.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *L. S. McParlcmd*and *W. J. Riley,*both of Cudahy, attorneys, and *Miles C. Riley*of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by *Miles C. Riley.*

The following opinion was filed March 3, 1936:

Fówler, J.

The action is brought by the beneficiary of a life insurance policy to recover for the death of the insured upon a clause of the policy providing for a double indemnity in case the death of the insured “resulted, directly and independently of all other causes, from injury effected solely, externally, violently and accidentally, . . . within sixty days after sustaining such injury.” The facts were stipulated. The insured died as the result of “heat prostration, or what is commonly known as sunstroke.” There were no visible *280marks of injury or violence upon his person. Upon the stipulated facts, the court entered judgment for the double indemnity upon the clause of the policy above stated.

The clause involved is identical with that involved ift *O’Connell v. New York Life Ins. Co.*220 Wis. 61, 264 N. W. 253. It being stipulated that the death of the insured was caused by heat prostration, the case is ruled by the *O’Connell Case.*There is no need or occasion to add to what is said in the opinion in that case.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on April 28, 1936.