alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 14, 2018

s0213

Order 

Clerk

February 14, 2018

157088

SC: 157088

In re CLEMONS, Minors. COA: 338177

Genesee CC Family Division:

16-133700-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanguine Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), we, Thomas C.
Drees, President and Chief Executive Officer and David Nelson, Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: 8/16/2006                           /s/Thomas C. Drees
      ----------                           -------------------------------
                                           Thomas C. Drees, Ph.D.
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Director

Dated: 8/14/2006                           /s/David E. Nelson
      ----------                           -------------------------------
                                           David E. Nelson
                                           Chief Financial Officer,
                                           Secretary/Treasurer and
                                           Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,797
<PP&E>                                       5,834,786
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,119,109)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,434,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,657
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,434,972
<SALES>                                        704,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               708,031
<CGS>                                          595,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  595,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                99,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,596
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,596
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,596
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MARGARET DORMAN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1710

)

MID-STATE PLUMBING, INC., a )

Florida profit corporation, and )

GREGORY TAYLOR, an individual, )

)

Appellees. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 21, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; John Radabaugh, Judge.

David I. Shiner, Lara S. Shiner, and

Ronnie M. Gotti II of Shiner Law Group,

Boca Raton, for Appellant.

Michael L. Forte and Robert L. Blank,

B.C.S., of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell,

P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 17

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  limit the number of consecutive terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2017

Mr. Palazzo (for himself and Mr. Sanford) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  limit the number of consecutive terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has been a Senator for two consecutive 
terms shall again be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate 
until the date that is one year after the end of such second 
consecutive term.
    ``Section 2. No person who has been a Representative for six 
consecutive terms shall again be eligible for election to the House of 
Representatives until the date that is one year after the end of the 
sixth consecutive term.
    ``Section 3. For purposes of this article, any term a person serves 
as a Senator or Representative to fill a vacancy shall not be included 
in determining the number of consecutive terms that the person has been 
a Senator or Representative unless the period of time for which the 
person fills the vacancy is greater than three years in the case of a 
Senator or greater than one year in the case of a Representative.
    ``Section 4. For the purposes of this article, any term that began 
before the date of the ratification of this article shall not be 
included in determining the number of consecutive terms that a person 
has been a Senator or Representative.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 28, 2016

p1212

Order 

Clerk

December 28, 2016

152781(23)(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152781

COA: 329345

St. Joseph CC: 12-017973-FC;

CLARENCE ALLEN WALTER, III, 12-017974-FC

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 6, 

2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. The motion to expand the record is DENIED.
APPENDIX 4 

Number of Vehicles Included in the I/M Program 
(This page intentionally left blank)
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 1
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 2
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 3
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 4
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 5
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 6
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 7
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 8
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 9
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 10
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 11
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 12
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 13
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 14
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 15
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 16
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 17
Counties Required to Implement I/M

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 4 - 18
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 111 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 111

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
      Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration Agreements''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the

              

 Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration 
Agreements'' (82 Fed. Reg. 33210 (July 19, 2017)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 111

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
      Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration Agreements''.
```
# dep

west virginia department of environmental protection Exec uti ve Offi ce 60 I 57th Street SE Charl es to n, WV 25304 Phon e: ( 3 04) 926-0440 Fax : (304) 926-0446

Mr
. Shawn M
. Garvin Regional Administrator U
. S. E PA, Region III (3RAOO) 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 June 6, 2012 Earl Ray T omblin , G ov ernor Rand y C. Huffm a n, Cabin et Secreta ry www . de p.wv . go v



### Re: Revision to the West Virginia State Implementation Plan Pursuant to Prevention of Significant Deterioration -Request For Approval Dear Administrator Garvin : On behalf of the State of We s t Virginia , I am herein submitting the 2012 Legislative Rule 45CSR14

- 

### Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationat y Sourc es for th e Pr e ve ntion of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality, effective June 1 , 2012, a s a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). Included in this submittal is appropriate documentation which validates that proper state and federal administrative procedural rulemaking requirements have been fulfilled
. Also included with this submittal is an electronic copy on compact disk in searchable PDF format. We certify that the enclosed electronic copy contains an exact duplicate of information contained in the hardcopy submis s ion. West Virginia requests that you approve this most recent version of 45CSR14 as a revision to the SIP , replacing the current version of 45CSR14 approved by EPA on May 27, 2011 at 76 FR 30832. If you have any questions regarding this submittal or require additional information , please contact John A. Benedict, Director of the Division of Air Qu a lity at (304) 926-0462. Sincerely ,

# ~:t~ Cabinet Secretary Enclosure

cc: Diana Esher (3APOO) John A. Benedict , Director, WVD E P 

### Promoting a h e a lthy e nv ironm e nt.
#### Trampe (Julia), Plaintiff, vs. Wisconsin Telephone Company and another, Defendants. [Cross-appeals.]

*January 10*

February *6, 1934.*

*221For the plaintiff Trampe there was a brief by *Brennan, Lucas & McDonough*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *M. J. Brennan*and *G. L. McDonough.*

For the defendant Wisconsin Telephone Company there were briefs by *Miller, Mack & Fairchild,*and oral argument by *Leon F. Foley,*all of Milwaukee.

For the defendant .Wren there was a brief by *Qucwles, Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Arthur Wickham*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Wickham.*

Fairchild, J.

When this case was finally brought on for trial, no cause of action existed in favor of Julia Trampe against the appellant Telephone Company. The claim which *222Julia Trampe had theretofore alleged against the appellant had been rejected by a jury and the court below had in July directed the dismissal of her complaint on the merits. By reason of the stipulation made on the part of Julia Trampe with Wren, no cause of action remained in her against him. After the trial, when the true situation was disclosed before the court, the complaint of Julia Trampe and the cross-complaint of Wren should have been dismissed.

With reference to Julia Trampe’s position in this matter, no justification for litigation exists, and her complaint must be dismissed. With reference to the claim of Wren, we have not considered whether under the law of the case he and appellant are joint tortfeasors, but because of the facts set forth, and the imposition upon the court of a fictitious suit (see case of Herman Trampe, plaintiff, against the Wisconsin Telephone Co. and Harry Wren, defendants, decided herewith, *ante,*p. 210, 252 N. W. 675), he is not entitled to recover any amount whatever, nor does he take his costs.

The American Automobile Insurance Company mentioned in the judgment was not a party to the action and the reference to it evidently was inadvertently made. Under the ruling, no further consideration need be given that matter.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, cause remanded with directions to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, the defendant Wren’s cross-complaint, and to enter judgment in favor of appellant.
----

            COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2006/78/EC

of 29 September 2006         

amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purposes of adapting Annex II thereto to technical progress

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

After consulting the Scientific Committee of Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products intended for Consumers,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

In Annex II to Directive 76/768/EEC entry No 419 is replaced by the following:

Article 2

1.   Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 30 March 2007 at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.

When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.

2.   Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.

Article 3

This Directive shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 4

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 September 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p. 169. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2006/65/EC (OJ L 198, 20.7.2006, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 273, 10.10.2002, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 208/2006 (OJ L 36, 8.2.2006, p. 25).

(3)OJ L 147, 31.5.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1041/2006 (OJ L 187, 8.7.2006, p. 10).

----
EXHIBIT
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006 of AMERCO and
      U-Haul International, Inc. (together, the “Company”), as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Edward J.
      Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:









(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







AMERCO,


a
      Nevada
      corporation


/s/
      Edward J. Shoen


Edward
      J.
      Shoen


President
      and Chairman of the Board


Date:
      June 12, 2006








U-HAUL
      INTERNATIONAL, INC.,


a
      Nevada
      corporation




/s/
      Edward J. Shoen


Edward
      J.
      Shoen


President
      and Chairman of the Board


Date:
      June 12, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polymer Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended July 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis E. Norman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
August 17, 2010

/s/ DENNIS E. NORMAN Dennis E. Norman Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on July 31, 2023 

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 18-0701 Midvale Paper Box 

Company, Inc. 10/21/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

2 20-0653

Eastern Gas 

Transmission and 

Storage, Inc.

10/28/21 DFR 11/05/21 Closed

3 19-0622 Anthony Marano Co. 02/10/22 DFR 02/16/22 Closed

4 20-0541 Harvey Builders d/b/a 

Harvey Cleary Builders 03/03/22 DFR 03/11/22 Closed

5 21-0432 Ariana Murrell-Rosario 

d/b/a Liberty Tax Service 07/01/22 DFR 07/13/22 Closed

6 20-1212 Roy Rock, LLC 07/14/22 DFR 07/15/22 Closed

7 20-0232 U.S. Ceiling Corp. 09/29/22 DFR 10/05/22 Closed

8 21-0794 U.S. Postal Service –

Canovanas Post Office 11/16/22 DFR 11/18/22 Closed

9 20-0032 UHS of Fuller, Inc.,

UHS of Delaware, Inc. 03/02/23 DFR 03/20/23 Open

10 21-0295 Poinsett Hutterian 

Brethren, Inc. 03/16/23 DFR 03/27/23 Open

11 20-1437 K.M. Davis Contracting 

Co., Inc. 03/23/23 DFR 03/31/23 Closed

12 17-0053 Joon, LLC d/b/a Ajin USA 03/23/23 DFR 03/29/23 Closed

13 20-0559 MasTec Services, Inc. 04/04/23 DFR 04/06/23 Open

14 19-1667 A Crane Rental LLC 04/27/23 DFR 04/27/23 Open

15 19-1054

Shawn D. Purvis d/b/a/ 

Purvis Home 

Improvement Co., Inc. (an 

individual) and Purvis 

Home Improvement Co., 

Inc. (in the alternative)

06/29/23 DFR 06/30/23 Open

16 19-1056

Shawn D. Purvis d/b/a/ 

Purvis Home 

Improvement Co., Inc. (an 

individual) and Purvis 

Home Improvement Co., 

Inc. (in the alternative)

06/29/23 DFR 06/29/23 Open
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on July 31, 2023 

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

17 19-1905

Shawn D. Purvis d/b/a/ 

Purvis Home 

Improvement Co., Inc. (an 

individual) and Purvis 

Home Improvement Co., 

Inc. (in the alternative)

06/29/23 DFR 06/29/23 Open

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review