August 8, 2015

Steven Briscoe 15 Desert Rose Pl The Wo odlands, TX 77382

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Wa shington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012

UA requested for exemption are listed below:

DJI Phantom 3 DJI Inspire 1 DJI Spreading W ings S800 EVO DJI Spreading W ings S900 DJI Spreading W ings S1000 DJI Spreading W ings S1000 Plus

Attachments: These attachments are too large for submission via the submi ssion portal. The User Manual, Quick Start Guide, and Safety Guidelines and Disclaimer for each of the following models are available at the following websites for viewing or download.

http://www.dji .com/product/phantom

- 3 http://www.dji.com/product/inspire

- 1 http://www.dji.com/product/spreading

- wings

- s800

- evo http://www.dji.com/product/spreading

- wings

- s900 http://www.dji.com/product/spreading

- wings

- s1000 http://www.dji.com/product/spreading

- wings

- s1000

- plus

References: 1) FAA Exemption No. 11138, Regulatory Docket No. FAA20140481in the matter of the petition of DOUGLAS TRUDEAU 2) FAA Exemption No. 11136, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

–2014

– 0508 in the matter of the petition of ADVANCED AVIATION SOLUTIONS LLC 3) FAA Exemption No. 11080 Regulatory Docket No. FAA20140355in the matter of the petition of FLYING CAM INC

Dear Sir or Madam,In a ccordance with the FAA’s Guidelines for Submitting a Petition for Exemption

under section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 , I, Steven Briscoe, referred to hereafter as the petitioner, request exemption from the following sections of Titl e 14, Code of Federal Regulations §§ **61.113(a); 61.113(b); 91.119(c); 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409 (a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) & (b);** 

In order to operate small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the purposes of aerial photography, cinematography, videography, mapping, crop surveying, inspections and other flight operations that could be performed safely and more cost effectively with the use of smal l UAS at low altitude within the U.S. national airspace system as compared to a manned aircraft. Operations will be performed only at the request of and with the authorization and permission of clients or their authorized agents in order to facilitate comm erce and raise awareness of the beneficial uses of small unmanned air systems. So long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. The conditions identifie d and proposed by the petitioner are drawn from references 13.

**The FA Rs**  The petitioner seeks exemption from the above mentioned FARs for the following
reasons;

**61.113(a) & (b)** ; The petitioner requests relief in order to facilitate the utilization of pilots, who hold a PRIVATE PILOT (or greater) certificate. Any pilots operating under this exemption would be required to comply with any conditions as set forth and in a similar fashion to the previously granted exemptions.

**91.119(c)** As discussed in Exemption 11138 (DOUGLAS TRUDEAU), operations conducted closer than 500 feet to the ground may require that the UA be operated closer than 500 feet to essential persons, or objects that wou ld not be possible without additional relief. The petitioner requests modification, waiver or exemption and clarification concerning the terms “congested areas” and “densely populated”. The petitioner requests waiver for this condition to allow reasonable and responsible operations in areas of subdivisions and neighborhoods if required

**91.121** As discussed in Exemption 11138 (DOUGLAS TRUDEAU) is inapplicable since the UAS does not have an altimeter and instead utilizes electronic GPS with a barometric sens or for altitude information.

**91.151(a)** As discussed in Exemption 11136 (ADVANCED AVIATION SOLUTIONS LLC) prior relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the prescribed minimums, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and10650. In addition, similar UAS specific relief has been granted in Exemption

Nos. 8811, 10808, and 10673 for daytime, VFR conditions. The UAS provides battery power remain ing in percent to the PIC. Information provided in the operating documents discusses procedu res regarding rema ining battery power management. Those documents contain a condition in which the PIC will initiate a landing procedure when battery remaining reaches a specified level. Given the limitations on proposed operations and the location of th ose proposed operations, t he FAA found that a reduced minimum power reserve for flight in daytime VFR conditions was reasonable.

**91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409 (a)(1) & (2); 91.417(a) & (b)** As discussed in Exemption 11138 (DOUGLAS TRUDEAU), The petition er proposes to inspect and ensure that the UAS is in a condition for safe flight in accordance with the operating documents. The FAA found that adherence to the petitioner’s operating documents and the conditions and limitations specified, describing the requirements for maintenance, inspection, and recordkeeping, were sufficient to ensure that safety would not be adversely affected.

**The UA S**  All UA requested for exemption are manufactured by DJI. All UA requested for exemption weigh less than 55 pounds including payload. All UA requested for exemption have a maximum speed less than 87 knots. Other specifications for each model can be found with the internet links listed above.

**Risk mitigation** The petitioner has reviewed FAA exemptions reference’s 13 Conditions and Limitations section and believes that the procedures specified therein are reasonable and will be utilized in order to manage and mitigate risk and ensure public safety. A preflight checklist will be developed and employed to ensure that the UA airworthiness will be verified before launch. All operations will be in accordance with the prescribed manufacturer User Manuals and sa fety guidelines. Airworthiness will be maintained by performance of routine inspections before each flight, maintaining flight and maintenance logs to record time on failure prone components.

The petitioner request that in a manner similar to reference 3, he be allowed to operate within 5 miles of an airport provided that;

“ The UA may not operate in Class B, C, or D airspace without written approval from the FAA. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of the geographic center of a non towered a irport as denoted on a current FAA published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’ s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’ s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request .”Operations within 5 miles of an airport are not anticipated to be routine but the

petitioner is requesting a mechanism to facilitate such activities without requesting a new and separate exemption(s) should the need arise. Operations within class B airspace are not requested due to the lack of mode C transponder.

**Public interest** Use of the UAS in lieu of a manned aircraft would enhance safety and reduce the environmental impact as compared to similar operations conducted with manned aircraft of greater proportions, carrying a crew and flammable fuel. Additionally, use of the UAS i n order to facilitate commerce could lead to economic growth. Operations for this petition will enable service for property owners or their designees seeking an enhanced perspective for characteristics, amenities, and benefits of their desired photographic subjects that cannot be displayed through ground level videography/photography. Aerial photography is a valuable marketing tool that can lead to increased commerce and enhance personal photography. Crop surveying applications could lead to decreased use o f pesticides and fertilizer and conservation of water as well as increased crop yields and decreased costs. Aerial surveying and inspections can increase work site efficiency, improve volumetric estimations and reduce risks. The petitioner will provide cli ents with photographic data for these purposes on a ‘for hire’ basis acting as an independent contractor. A visual observer will be utilized. Liability insurance will be obtained commensurate with the granting of this request for exemption. Flight data inc luding UA flight time, Control Unit operation time, incident, accident, and details concerning any deviations from normal operations will be available to FAA for use in collecting data regarding the use of UAS as part of this application. This data may be submitted to FAA via traditional means, e.g. COA Monthly Reports, or other means as required.

**Conclusion** The petitioner is requesting this exemption for the purposes of “aerial photography, cinematography, videography, mapping, crop surveying, inspectio ns and other flight operations”. The reason for such a general and broad based request is that the petitioner wishes to utilize a business strategy of horizontal integration and maximize economies of scope in order to capitalize on opportunities as they ma y arise in the future without the long turnaround time associated with additional exemptions. The petitioner's business model is based on the idea of offering ad hoc small UAS services to individuals or companies who wish to employ these services as a safe, effective, and legal option to enhance their business or hobby. The petitioner’s own market research shows pent up demand for these services currently exists in the real estate market and other markets are just beginning to emerge. The petitioner has refrained from engaging in commercial use of the UAS. The primary purpose of seeking this exemption is to obtain the capability to offer those services while remaining in compliance. The petitioner holds an ATP Certificate, and a current FAA First Class Me dical.Respectfully submitted,

Steven Briscoe