alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on August 31, 2023 

DOCKET 

NUMBER 

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME 

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING 

NOTICE 

DATE 

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING 

1 18-0701 Midvale Paper Box 

Company, Inc. 10/21/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed 

2 20-0653 

Eastern Gas 

Transmission and 

Storage, Inc. 

10/28/21 DFR 11/05/21 Closed 

3 19-0622 Anthony Marano Co. 02/10/22 DFR 02/16/22 Closed 

4 20-0541 Harvey Builders d/b/a 

Harvey Cleary Builders 03/03/22 DFR 03/11/22 Closed 

5 21-0432 Ariana Murrell-Rosario 

d/b/a Liberty Tax Service 07/01/22 DFR 07/13/22 Closed 

6 20-1212 Roy Rock, LLC 07/14/22 DFR 07/15/22 Closed 

7 20-0232 U.S. Ceiling Corp. 09/29/22 DFR 10/05/22 Closed 

8 21-0794 U.S. Postal Service – 

Canovanas Post Office 11/16/22 DFR 11/18/22 Closed 

9 20-0032 UHS of Fuller, Inc., 

UHS of Delaware, Inc. 03/02/23 DFR 03/20/23 Open 

10 21-0295 Poinsett Hutterian 

Brethren, Inc. 03/16/23 DFR 03/27/23 Open 

11 20-1437 K.M. Davis Contracting 

Co., Inc. 03/23/23 DFR 03/31/23 Closed 

12 17-0053 Joon, LLC d/b/a Ajin USA 03/23/23 DFR 03/29/23 Closed 

13 20-0559 MasTec Services, Inc. 04/04/23 DFR 04/06/23 Open 

14 19-1667 A Crane Rental LLC 04/27/23 DFR 04/27/23 Open 

15 19-1054 

Shawn D. Purvis d/b/a/ 

Purvis Home 

Improvement Co., Inc. (an 

individual) and Purvis 

Home Improvement Co., 

Inc. (in the alternative) 

06/29/23 DFR 06/30/23 Open 

16 19-1056 

Shawn D. Purvis d/b/a/ 

Purvis Home 

Improvement Co., Inc. (an 

individual) and Purvis 

Home Improvement Co., 

Inc. (in the alternative) 

06/29/23 DFR 06/29/23 Open 

Page 1 of 2 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on August 31, 2023 

DOCKET 

NUMBER 

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME 

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING 

NOTICE 

DATE 

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING 

17 19-1905 

Shawn D. Purvis d/b/a/ 

Purvis Home 

Improvement Co., Inc. (an 

individual) and Purvis 

Home Improvement Co., 

Inc. (in the alternative) 

06/29/23 DFR 06/29/23 Open 

18 21-0575 The Penta Building 

Group, LLC 08/10/23 DFR 08/14/23 Open 

19 23-0236 East West Seafoods LLC, 

dba F/V Pacific Producer 08/22/23 DFR 

20 20-0306 Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. 08/29/23 DFR 08/30/23 Open 

*DFR – Direction For Review 

REM – Appellate Remand 

INT REV – Interlocutory Review 

Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President of ATEL Financial Services, LLC,
General  Partner of ATEL Cash  Distribution  Fund VI, L.P. (the  "Partnership"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:
May 11, 2004


/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
------------------------------
Paritosh K. Choksi
Executive Vice President of General
Partner, Principal Financial Officer of Registrant


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  Partnership  and  will  be  retained  by the  Partnership  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1800 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore, Maryland 21230

Dear Secretary Summers:

On December 16, 201 1, the U. S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a

revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department oftheEnvironment. The SIP revision pertains to adoption of EPA’s Control Technique Guidelines(CTG) for lithographic and letterpress printing into Regulation 0.1 1 under COMAR 26.11.19 -

Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes. EPA ha determined that the submittal isadministratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of ProposedRulemaking.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Asrah Khadr,

at (215) 814-2071. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

cc: George S. Aburn, IVIDE

Brian Hug, MDE

Sincerely,

t_ \——

Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division

PriFted on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100%post-corrrmerflber andptocess chiorinefree.

Ctrsccrner Service Hctiie: i0C438.274
# Official Journal L 74/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 74 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6311 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 74

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6311 March 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/389 of 31 October 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union list of projects of common interest | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/390 of 10 March 2020 amending for the 312th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations | 20 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2020/391 of 20 September 2019 on the measure SA.34402 – 2015/C (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Germany for Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH
  (notified under document C(2019) 6836)

   (
  1
  ) | 22 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/389 of 31 October 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union list of projects of common interest

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/390 of 10 March 2020 amending for the 312th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

20

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2020/391 of 20 September 2019 on the measure SA.34402 – 2015/C (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Germany for Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH
  (notified under document C(2019) 6836)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2019) 6836)

1

22

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 3, 2021

No. 04-21-00343-CV

IN RE SATURNINO NIRA AND ASPHALT INC. L.L.C.,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI23616

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Original Proceeding1

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On August 17, 2021, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for stay 

pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. This court granted the stay and 

requested responses, which are due September 21, 2021.

On September 2, 2021, relators filed an unopposed motion to abate this original 

proceeding for thirty days to allow the parties to settle the underlying suit. The motion is 

GRANTED and all deadlines are held in abeyance pending further order of this court. Relators 

are ORDERED to file a motion to extend the abatement, reinstate this original proceeding, or 

dismiss this original proceeding no later than October 8, 2021.

It is so ORDERED September 3, 2021.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CI-23616, styled Alyson Lewis v. Saturnin Nira and Asphalt Inc. 

LLC d/b/a Lone Star Paving, pending in the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The orders at issue 

in this original proceeding were signed by the Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Presiding Judge of the 408th Judicial 

District Court, Bexar County, Texas; the Honorable David Canales, Presiding Judge of the 73rd Judicial District 

Court, Bexar County, Texas; the Honorable Tina Torres, Presiding Judge of the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar 

County, Texas; and the Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Presiding Judge of the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar 

County, Texas.
PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS 12* Caurt oiAppeals District

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308,CAPITOLSTATION,AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 FILE COPY



### 11/4/2015 COA No. 12-14-00189-CR 

### HASS, TRACYRAY Tr. Ct. No. 061728 PD-0810-15 

## On this day, the Appellant's Pro Se petition for discretionary review has been refused. 

### Abel Acosta, Clerk 12TH COURT OFAPPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 

### 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 TYLER, TX 75701 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 137 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 137

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  authorizing the territories of the United States to cast electoral 
                    votes in presidential elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2018

   Ms. Bordallo submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  authorizing the territories of the United States to cast electoral 
                    votes in presidential elections.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is hereby proposed as 
an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. If the number of persons in a territory of the United 
States exceeds thirty thousand, the territory shall appoint, in such 
manner as its territorial legislature may direct, a number of electors 
of President and Vice President equal to the whole number of 
Representatives to the House of Representatives to which such territory 
would be entitled if it were a State. Such electors shall be in 
addition to those appointed by the States and the District of Columbia, 
but they shall be considered, for the purposes of the election of 
President and Vice President, to be electors appointed by a State. Such 
electors shall meet in the territory in which they were appointed and 
perform such duties as provided by the twelfth article of amendment.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6398** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JEFFREY TARRATS, a/k/a Skip, a/k/a Ozzy , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:04

- cr - 00016

- RAJ

- JEB

- 7 )

Submitted : July 22, 2015 Decided: July 29, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jeffrey Tarrats, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bindi ng precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Tarrats appeals the district court ’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Tarrats , No. 2:04

- cr - 00016

- RAJ

- JEB

- 7 (E.D. Va. June 18, 2015; filed Feb. 27, 2015, entered Feb. 28, 2015); see also United
States v. Mann , 709 F.3d 301, 304

- 05 (4th Cir. 2013) (according deference to a district court’s interpretation of its own judgment). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the de cisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Docket No. FAA-2012-1155
#### HEMAN H. ROBINSON *vs.*JOSHUA BRYAN & AL.

Where, in an appeal bond given by the defendant, the plaintiff’s name is omitted, although the Court at the first term would dismiss the appeal un - less the defendant gave a sufficient bond, yet they will not do so as a matter of course, when several terms have elapsed.

The cases of *McDowell*v *Bradley,*8 Ire. 92, *Wallace*v *Garbit,*4 Ire. 45, and *Arrington*v *Smith,*4 Ire, 59, cited an'd approved.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Bladen County, at the Spring Term, 1851, his Honor Judge Manly presiding.

'The suit began in the County Court and was there tried on issues, and the plaintiff had a verdict and judgment in February 1849. The defendant appealed, and in filling up the appeal bond the name of the plaintiff, as the obligee, was omitted by the Clerk. The defendant filed the transcript in the Superior Court before the next term, which was in April 1849, and each'party summoned witnesses and the suit pended until April term 1851; and then the plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal for the defect in the bond. The Court allowed the motion, and the defendant appealed.

*W. Window,*for the plaintiff.

*Strange,*for the defendant.

Ruffin, C. J.

If the motion had been made at the first term it would have been proper to allow it, unless the defendant had then offered to give ‘ a sufficient bond. *McDowell*v. *Bradley,*8 Ire. 92. So, if the defendants were not of substance to answer the plaintiff’s recovery made and the «costs, the Court might have laid them under a rule to *184give a proper bond, which would secure the plaintiff. There was no suggestion of that kind, but the plaintiff insisted peremptorily, that the Court- should not entertain the appeal, by reason, merely, that an appeal bond had not been duly given. Now the omission to make that motion, for two years after the case was in the Superior Court for trial, is, according to the established practice, such *laches*as deprives the appellee o( the right to make it at all. *Wallace*v. *Corbit*4 Ire. 45 ; *Arrington*v. *Smith,*4 Ire. 59.

Pee. Curiam. Judgment reversed, and a *procedendo*awarded.
HILLSBOROUGH,

APRIL TERM, 1793.

#### Ferguson and Wife *v.*Taylor.

Plaintiff’s wife, while *sole,*lent to Defendant specie certificates, to be returned in three weeks, or at any time when requested. The Plaintiff did not bring suit until after the expiration of three years from the end of the three weeks: but Plaintiffs proved Taylor had acknowledged the receiving the certificates within three years before the action brought; and said he had not settfed for them, but would pay them to the administrator of Plaintiff’s first husband, one Leonard. Per Judge Macay, here is no acknowledgment of the debt, but only acknowledgment it was not paid — there must be an acknowledgment of the debt. The authorities cited, which are 3 *Burr,*1097, and *Bong.*653, went upon the acknow-*28lodgment of the debt, not of a fact which shews it to be unsatisfied : and the jury found accordingly.

Note. — Vide *Bank of Newbern v. Sneed,*3 *Hawks*500, in which the Counsel took an extended view of all the cases upon the subject, and the Court recognised the principle of those which require an acknowledgment of a present subsisting debt to take a case out oí the statute.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Polymer Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended April 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis E. Norman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
August 17, 2010

/s/ DENNIS E. NORMAN Dennis E. Norman Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 36 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.36
                                        Agreed to April 27, 2017        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 17, 2017, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
        (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
        (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 22, 2014

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 13

‐ 2905

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee

,

v.

NORVELL MOORE,

Defendant–Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division

No. 10 CR 896

‐ 1

John F. Grady, Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion issued in the above

‐ entitled case on August 19, 2014, is hereby

amended as follows:

On page 15, line 6, “unanimity of its verdicts on Counts One

and Two” should be changed to “unanimity of its verdicts

on Counts Two and Three”.

On page 16, line 4, “a new trial on Counts One and Two”

should be changed to “a new trial on Counts Two and

Three”.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, P. Chrisman Iribe, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 of Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the co-registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The co-registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
co-registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the co-registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the co-registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered in this report based
on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the co-registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
co-registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the co-registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the co-registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The co-registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the co-registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
co-registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the co-registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
co-registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 12, 2004 /s/ P. CHRISMAN IRIBEP. Chrisman IribePresident
Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P.