alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00798-CR

Dustin Taylor Parks, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

NO. 48204, THE HONORABLE EVAN C. STUBBS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Dustin Taylor Parks pleaded guilty to the offense of evading arrest with 

a vehicle and, following a hearing on punishment, was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment. 

See Tex. Penal Code § 38.04.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported 

by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record 

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); 

see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 86-87 (1988).

Appellant’s counsel has represented to the Court that he has provided copies of 

the motion and brief to appellant; advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record 

and file a pro se brief; and provided appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the 
2

appellate record along with the mailing address of this Court. See Kelly v. Smith, 436 S.W.3d 

313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 

766. Appellant requested access to the appellate record, and pursuant to this Court’s order, the 

clerk of the trial court provided written verification to this Court that the record was provided to 

appellant. See Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 321. To date, appellant has not filed a pro se response or 

requested an extension of time to file a response.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate 

counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 

766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel 

that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s judgment of conviction

is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith

Affirmed

Filed: June 11, 2019

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 5 (Sunday, January 11, 2009)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D25]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR MONDAY,

                            JANUARY 12, 2009

        (Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated)

                                 Senate

  No meetings/hearings scheduled.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E56-E57]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        TRIBUTE TO RUTH COLE-CHU

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JOE COURTNEY

                             of connecticut

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, January 9, 2009

  Mr. COURTNEY. Madam Speaker, I rise today to honor the life of one of 
eastern Connecticut's most dynamic leaders, Ruth Cole-Chu of Salem, who 
passed away on Wednesday, January 7, 2009.
  Ruth was born in Hweli, China where her parents were serving as 
Baptist Missionaries. After returning to the United States, Ruth 
attended Wheaton College in Illinois where she received her bachelor of 
arts in speech communications. She later attended Golden Gate 
University School of Law in San Francisco where she received her law 
degree.
  Ruth was a devoted wife, mother, and public servant. She was also an 
attorney and an education consultant. As an active member of her 
community, she participated in various local boards and commissions. 
She served 6 years as a member of the Board of Education, including a 
term as chairwoman, where she fought tirelessly to expand opportunities 
for the students of Salem. While she began her career as an attorney, 
it was as an advocate for children that Ruth truly made her mark.
  Ruth believed that school communities should be a place where 
children from all walks of life could grow and learn. She was an

[[Page E57]]

unwavering advocate for multiculturalism and diversity, and it was with 
that in mind that she founded the Inter-district School for Arts and 
Communications, the ISAAC Charter School. Since 1997, the ISAAC school 
has offered a unique educational experience for students in 
southeastern Connecticut where they can learn about the importance of 
diversity and the value of community service.
  Ruth's belief in compassion and open-mindedness is a message that she 
carried to all she met. It is a spirit that lives on in her own 
children, Emily, Hannah and Lily. While her compassion for all children 
marked her legacy, it was the love that she had for her own children 
that defined her life.
  We in eastern Connecticut are blessed to have had such a dedicated 
public servant and those of us who knew her are blessed to have had 
such a friend. We will take solace in her memory and the example that 
she set for thousands of young people across our State. To Lee, her 
beloved husband, and the entire Cole-Chu family, please know that our 
thoughts and prayers are with you.

                          ____________________
```
# Official Journal C 204/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 204 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6217 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 204

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6217 June 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 204/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fourth supplement to the 37th complete edition | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 204/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fourth supplement to the 37th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
** **

**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David M. Young, ChiefFinancial Officer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated, (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

# 1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the period ended June 25, 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

# 2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

| Date: August 9, 2006 |   | /s/ David M. Young |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------|
|                 |   | David M. Young     |

##  

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 3030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1048]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twenty-Eighth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical Information 
and Meteorological Data Link Services.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
twenty-eighth meeting of RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services

DATES: The meeting will be held February 6-10, 2012, from 8 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Doubletree Suites by Hilton 
Melbourne Beach Oceanfront, 1665 N. Highway A1A, Melbourne, Florida 
32903

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 206, Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological data Link Services. The agenda will 
include the following:

February 6, 2012

 Welcome, Introductions, and Administrative Remarks
 Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes
 Review and approve meeting agenda
 Introduce advisory and normal definitions
 Review proposed TOR changes
 ConUse Review

February 7, 2012

 ConUse Review

February 8, 2012

 SG1, SG2, and SG3 Meetings

February 9, 2012

 SG1, SG2, and SG3 Meetings

February 10, 2012

 Plenary Session
 Sub-Group 1 Report
 Sub-Group 2 Report
 Sub-Group 3 Report
 Action item review
 Future meeting plans and dates
 Plenary presentation selection process
 Approve advisory and normal definitions
 Approve proposed TOR changes and new or modified Sub-groups' 
roles and responsibilities
 Decision to release ConUse document for FRAC process
 Other business
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 12, 2012.
John Raper,
Manager, Business Operations Branch, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-1048 Filed 1-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-50096

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LETICIA MARTINEZ, also known as

Leticia Torres,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-95-CR-214-1

- - - - - - - - - -

September 20, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leticia Martinez appeals from her conviction and sentence

following her guilty plea to one count of bank fraud in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. She argues that her guilty plea was not

knowing and voluntary, that she received ineffective assistance

of counsel because her attorney advised her that she would

probably receive probation if she pleaded guilty, and that the

district court erred by refusing to grant her a reduction for
No. 96-50096

-2-

acceptance of responsibility. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Martinez's guilty plea was knowingly

and voluntarily entered. See United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d

296, 298 (5th Cir. 1993) (en banc). Martinez has not

demonstrated a reasonable probability that, but for the alleged

statement by her attorney regarding her probable sentence, she

would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted upon going

to trial. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 57-58 (1985). 

Finally, the district court did not clearly err by denying her a

reduction for acceptance of responsibility. See United States v.

Wilder, 15 F.3d 1292, 1298 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.