Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s MAC TPerformance Tes tPla n Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : Appendice s



# Appendi xC Isokineti c Samplin g Trai n Setu p an d Recover ySchematics

O:\mw97\PVq^\10002022Weoti a Performance Tes t Pla n U 3 R2_052108.do c



## V E S 00262 9•\ 

# iii i 

# AECO M

SAMPL E TRAI N SETU P MULTIMETAL

S (a s PerEPAMetho

d 2 9 / 0060 )

IMPINGER S - 1s tempt y* 2n d - 10 0 m L 5 % HN0 3/10 % H 2 O z 3r d - 10 0 m L 5 % HN0 3/10 % H 2 O z 4t h - empt y 5t h - 100mL10%H 2 S O 4 /4%KMnO 4 6t h - 10 0 m L 10 % H 2 S 0 4/ 4 % KMnO „ 7t h Silic a Ge l
FIEL D BLANK S - (Exac t Volume s Specifie d b yMethod )
0. 1 N HN0 3 - 30 0 m L 5 % HNO a/10 % H 2 0 2- 20 0 m L 10 % H 2 S 0 4/

4 % KMn0 4- 10 0 m L D l Wate r- 10 0 m L 8 N HC I - 2 5 m L (adde d t o 20 0 m L water ) Filte r- On e unuse d filte r

* optiona l - use d fo rhig h moistur e stack s

Q:taiw9nPrajertsU0002022lApperidi) i Cal l unils\[selupM60 xlsJHIMOIS T



## V E S 00263 0

# AECO M

NOZZL E

Brush ; 0. 1 N f-25 r Rins e

HNO 3 nl) 3 X PROB E

Brush/ 0. 1 N f-50 n Rins e HNO 3 nL(3 X FRON THAL F FILTE R HOUSIN G FILTE R

Brush/Rins e 0. 1 N HNO 3 ( ~ 2 5 mL

) 3 X Carefull yremov e filter fro m suppor

twith Teflon coate d tweezers an d plac e i n petr i dis h

25 0 m L Ambe r 1 1

Brus h loos e f

. pet i >articulat

e onto i dis h


### F H - HNO

3 (2 ) Containe r3 Sea l petri dis h wit h tape

Notel : Exactl y10 0 m L o f0. 1 N HN0 3 use d fo rrinsin g nozzle , prob e an d F H filte r housing . Not e 2 : Nozzle , prob e an d F H filte rhousin g ar e rinse d wit h wate rfollowe d b yaceton e afte rth e nitri c aci d rinse . Th e wate ran d aceton e ar e the n discarded . Filte r ( D Containe r1



## METHO D 2

9 (METALS ) RECOVER YSCHEMATI C FRON THAL FRECOVER Y Pag e 1 o f2

J:\Air_Tox\Schematics\Recovery\M29FH.doc



## V E S 00263 1

# ENS R AECO M IMPINGER S

FILTE R SUPPOR TAN D BAC K HAL FO F FILTE R HOUSIN G

Rins e Thre e Time s wit h 0. 1 N Nitri c Aci d (Empty) (Optional )

Measur e Volum e

Emptyth

e into C c Content s ntaine r

Rins e T h with 0. 1 N ree Time s

Nitri c Aci d

Note : Exactl y10 0 m L o f nitri c aci d i s use d t o rins e al l component s u p throug h impinger s 1-3 . 2 n dan d 3 M (HN0 3 /H 2 0 2 )

Measure Volum e

Empt yth e Int o C o Content s rtaine r

Rins e Th r with 0. 1 N ae Time s

Nitri c Aci d
•

95 Q m L B H (Containe r4) 4 m (Empty ) 5 t h an d 6" 1 (KMn0 4 )

Measure Volum e

Empt yth e No . 4 Co n Cont i Impinge r tents Int o alner

Rins e wi t 0. 1 N h 100 m L HN0 3 •

25 0 m L 0. 1 N HNO 3 (Containe r5A) 7 

# * (Silic a Gel )

Weig h fo rMoisture Discar d

Emptyth e Impinge r Nos . 5 an d 6 Content s into Containe r
Rins e Thre e Time s wit h Permanganat e Reagent , (100 m L total ) the n wit h Wate r (100 m L total )

50 0 m L KMn0 4 (Containe r5B ) Remov e An y Residu e wit h 2 5 m L 8 N HC I Solutio n

25 0 m L 8 N HC I (Containe r5C ) J:\Ai rTox\Schematics\Recoverv\M29BH.doc METHO D 2 9 (METALS ) RECOVER YSCHEMATI C - BAC KHAL FRECOVER Y Pag e 2 o f2

## V E S 00263 3Prepare d fo r Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s 7 Mobil e Avenu e Sauget , I L 6220 1



# Metal s Performanc eTes t Pla nPrepare d fo r th eRotar y Kil nIncinerator Number 4 i nAccordanc ewith 4 0 CF R§ 63 Subpar

t EE E

ENS R Corporatio n Ma y200 8 Documen tNo. : 10002-02 2 

# ENS RPrepare d for . Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s 7 Mobil e Avenu e Sauge tI L 6220 1



# Metal s Performanc eTes t Pla nPrepare d fo r th eRotar y Kil nIncinerator Number 4 i nAccordanc ewith 4 0CF R§ 63 Subpar

t EE E

Reviewe d B yCrai g Doolittl e

ENS R Corporatio n Ma y200 8 Documen tNo. : 10002-02 2 

# ENS RRevision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : Tabl e o

fContents Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes tPla n Pageiofv i 

# Contents

1. 0 Introductio n 1 1. 1 Progra m Summar y[4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f ) an d § 63.7(c)(2)(i) ] 1 1. 2 Facility/Uni t Identificatio n 1 1.2. 1 Genera l 1 1.2. 2 Facilit yID , Mailin g Address , an d Primar yContact s 1 1.2. 3 Incinerato rOvervie w1 1. 3 Purpos e an d Objective s o fth e Performanc e Tes t 2 1.3. 1 Genera l 2 1. 4 Performanc e Tes tPla n Organizatio n 2
2. 0 Engineerin g Descriptio n - 1 2. 1 Proces s Overvie w1 2. 2 Wast e Fee d System s [4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(c ) an d (f)(1XHi)(D) an d (E) ] 1 2.2. 1 Uni t4 Liqui d Wast e Fee d Syste m an d Blendin g Operation s 1 2. 3 Manufacturer , Mak e an d Mode l o fth e Incinerato r[4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(A) ] 2 2.3. 1 Combustio n Chambe ran d Burner s [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f)( 1 p)(B ) an d (C ) 2 2.3. 2 Secondar yCombustio n Chambe r(SCC ) 3 2.3. 3 Locatio n ofCombustio n Zon e Temperatur e Devic e [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f)( 1 )(xix)] 4 2.3. 4 Hazardou s Wast e Residenc e Tim e [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f) (1 )(ix)] 4 2.3. 5 Combustio n Syste m Lea k 4 2.3. 6 Emergenc ySafet yVen t 4 2. 4 Procedure s fo rRapidl yStoppin g Hazardou s Wast e Fee d Durin g Equipmen tMalfunctio n [40 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(viii) ] 5 2. 5 Ai rPollutio n Contro l Equipmen t[4 0 CF R §63.1207(f)( 1 )(iii)(G) ] 5 2.5. 1 Ai rPollutio n Contro l System s Description s 5 2. 6 Stac k

Emission s Monitorin g [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f){1)(iii)(H) ] 8 2.6. 1 CE M Syste m Descriptio n 8 2. 7 Proces s Monitorin g an d Contro l 9 2. 8 Automati c Wast e Fee d Cut-of fSyste m [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f)( 1 )(ili)(F)] 9 2.8. 1 AWFC O Syste m Testin g 1 0 2. 9 Ai rPollutio n Contro l Equipmen tMaintenanc e Practice s [40 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(G) ] 1 0 2.9. 1 Progra m Overvie w1 0 2.9. 2 Tes tProgra m Preparatio n Activitie s 1 1

Q:\mw97\Proiects\10002022Weoli a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00263 6Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : Tabl e o

fContents

3. 0 Incinerato rFee d Strea m Description s „ : 1 3. 1 Genera l , '. 1 3. 2 Hig h Volum e Waste s 1 3.2. 1 Liqui d Waste s , - 1 3.2. 2 Bul k

Solid s ' . 1 3.2. 3 Containerize d Wast e 1 3. 3 Auxiliar yfuel s 1 4. 0 Performanc e Tes t Protoco l —« ~ 1 4. 1 Genera l Descriptio n 1 4. 2 Performanc e Standard s 1 4. 3 TestCondifions[40CFR§63.1207(f)(1)(vi)and(vii) ] ' . 1 4. 4 Wast e Fee d Spikin g 1 4.4. 1 Inorgani c Constituent s 2 4.4. 2 Spikin g fo rth e LV M Categor y2 4.4. 3 Spikin g fo rth e SV M Categor y2 4.4. 4 Spikin g fo rMercur y2 4. 5 Metal s Extrapolatio n Metho d '. 3 4. 6 Description , Preparatio n an d Deliver yo fFeed s fo rth e Performanc e Tes t [4 0 CF R § 63.120 7 (f)(1)(vi ) an d (vii)

] 3 4. 7 Conditionin g Tim e Neede d to Reac h Stead yStat e [4 0 CFR§63.1207(f)(1)(xii) ] 3 4. 8 Anticipate d Tes tSchedul e 3 4. 9 Performanc e Tes tReportin g : - , 4 5. 0 Samplin g an d Analytica l Progra m Qualit yAssurance/Qualit yContro l 1 5. 1 Titl e Pag e 2 5.1. 1 Projec tTitl e 2 5.1. 2 Expecte d Performanc e Tes tDat e 2 5.1. 3 Projec tApproval s t2 5. 2 Tabl e o fContent s 3 5. 3 Projec t Descriptio n 3 5. 4 Projec t Organizatio n •• 3 5.4. 1 Q AOfficer' s Responsibilitie s 3 5.4. 2 LaboratoryCoordinato rResponsibilitie s 3 5. 5 QA/Q C Progra m Objective s 4 5.5. 1 Precision , Accurac yan d Completenes s , 4
Q:\nwi97VProjecls\10002022\Vedi a Perfomiance Tes l Ha n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00263 7Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 j Section : Tabl e ofContent s

Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t4 HW C MAC TPerformanc e Tes tPla n Pag e Si o fv i

5.5. 2 Representativenes s an d Comparabilit y4 5.5. 3 Metho d Detectio n Limi t (MDL ) Determination s 5 5. 6 Samplin g an d Monitorin g Procedure s 5 5.6. 1 Rei d Progra m Descriptio n 5 5.6. 2 Pre-samplin g Activitie s 5 5.6.3 Samplin g Location s 7 5.6. 4 Wast e Fee d Strea m Samplin g Procedure s 7 5.6. 5 Stac k

Samplin g Methodologie s * . 7 5. 7 Sampl e Handling , Traceabilit yan d Holdin g Time s '. 8 5. 8 Analytica l Method s an d Calibratio n Procedure s 9 5.8. 1 Analysi s o fWast e Fee d Stream s 9 5.8. 2 Analysi s o fStac k Ga s Sample s 9 5. 9 Interna l Q AProgra m 1 0 5.9. 1 Dat a Collectio n an d Samplin g Q C Procedure s 1 0 5.9. 2 Analytica l Q C Procedure s fo rSample s t o b e Analyze d i n th e Laborator y1 1 5.1 0 Dat a Reduction , Verificatio n an d Dat a Reportin g 1 1 5.10. 1 Fiel d Dat a Reductio n 1 1 5.10. 2 LaboratoryAnalysi s Dat a Reductio n 1 2 5.10. 3 Dat a Verificatio n • •1 2 5.10. 4 Rna l Dat a Reportin g 1 3 5.1 1 Routin e Maintenanc e Procedure s an d Schedule s .- . 1 3 5.11. 1 Hel d Samplin g Equipmen t 1 4 5.11. 2 FacilityEquipmen tan d Instrumentatio n 1 4 5.1 2 QA/Q C Assessmen t Procedure s 1 4 5.12. 1 Accurac y1 4 5.12. 2 Precisio n : , 1 5 5.12. 3 Completenes s 1 5 5.1 3 Externa l Q AProgra m 1 5 5.13. 1 Performanc e Audit s 1 6 5.13. 2 Correctiv e Actio n 1 6 5.13. 3 QualityAssuranc e Report s t o Managemen t1 7

a\rm»97\Projects\10002022Weor a Performance Tes tPla n W R3_052108Jo e



## V E S 00263 8Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : Tabl e o

fContents Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit 4HW C MAC TPerformanc e Tes tPla n Pageivofv i 

# Listo fAppendices Appendi xAUni t 4 Proces s Flo wDiagra m Appendi xB Rei d Dat a Sampl e Collectio n Form s Appendi xC Isokineti c Samplin g Trai n Setu p an d Recover ySchematic s

Q$n^TV^ds\10WX22Mt^Ptrfomanot! Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00263 9Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : Tabl e o fContents Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes t Pla n Pag e vo fv i 

# Listo fTables Tabl e 1- 1 Summar yo fApplicabl e MAC TEmissio n Standard s 3 Tabl e 1 - 2 Cros s Referenc e o fPerfonnanc e Tes t Requirement s .' . -4 Tabl e 2- 1 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s - Continuou s Emission s Monitor s 8 Tabl e 2- 2 Technica l Informatio n Summar yo n Incinerato rNo . 4 : ; 1 2 Tabl e 2- 3 Curren t AWFC O Parameter s an d Limit s fo rIncinerato rNo . 4 1 3 Tabl e 3- 1 To p Volum e Liqui d Wast e Stream s .-. 2 Tabl e 3- 2 To p Bul k Soli d Wast e Stream s 2 Tabl e 3- 3 To p Containerize d Soli d Wast e Stream s : 3 Tabl e 3- 4 Summar yo fMajo rHAP s Processe d : , 3 Tabl e 3- 5 Typica l Propertie s fo rSupplementa l Fue l Oi l 4 Tabl e 3- 6 Typica l Propertie s fo rNatura l Ga s 4 Tabl e 4- 1 MAC TOPL s t o b e Establishe d Durin g th e Performanc e Tes t 5 Tabl e 4- 2 Metal s Evaluatio n Pla n 6 Tabl e 4- 3 Anticipate d Metal s Performanc e Tes t Schedul e 7 Tabl e 5- 1 Genera l Samplin g an d Analytica l Progra m Overvie w(Stac k Exhaust ) 1 9 Tabl e 5- 2 Q AObjective s fo rFiel d Measurement s 2 0 Tabl e 5- 3 Overal l Summar yo fPerfomianc e Tes t Stac k Ga s Samplin g an d Analysi s Progra m 2 1 Tabl e 5- 4 Travers e Poin t Location s 2 2 Tabl e 5- 5 Sampl e Preservatio n an d Holdin g Tim e Requirement s 2 3 Tabl e 5- 6 Q ARequirement s fo rMetal s i n Stac k Ga s b yICA P o rICP-M S 2 4

Q:\nM97\Projects\10002022WeoS a Performance Test Pla n U 4 R3_05210B.do c



## V E S 00264 0Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : Tabl e ofContents Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit 4 HW C MAC TPerfonnanc e Tes t Pla n Pageviofv i 

# Listo fFigures Rgur e 5- 1 Stac k

Samplin g Location s . : 2 5 Rgur e 5-2 Exampl e Sampl e Packin g Lis t ; , 2 6

Q:tai«7\Protffite\10M202aVeof e Performance Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00264 1Revision : 0 Date : May2008 Section : 1.0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes tPla n Pag e 1 o f5


# 1. 0 Introductio n
1.1 Progra m Summar y[4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f

) an d § 63.7(c)(2)(i)

] Thi s documen ti s th e Metal s Performanc e Tes tPla n fo rth e rotarykil n Incinerato rNumbe r4 operate d b yVeoli a E S Technica l Solution s (Veolia ) a tit s Sauget , Illinoi s facility . Sinc e th e Veoli a incinerato rtreat s certai n wast e tha t ar e classifie d a s hazardou s unde rstat e and/o rfedera l regulations , thi s uni t i s subjec tt o th e requirement s o fth e HW C MAC TRule . Thi s Pla n ha s bee n prepare d i n accordanc e wit h requirement s initiall ypromulgate d i n NESHAPS : Fina l Standard s fo rHazardou s Wast e Ai rPollutant s fo rHazardou s Wast e Combustors , (generall yreferre d t o a s th e Hazardou s Wast e Combusto r[o r"HWC" ] MAC TRule) . Thes e regulation s wer e initiall ypublishe d b y U S EP Ao n Septembe r30,199 9 i n 4 0 CF R § 6 3 Subpar t EEE . However , thes e initia l regulations wer e vacate d base d o n a D C Circui tCour truling , wer e subsequentl yreplace d b y"Interi m Standards " i n Februar yo f 200 2 an d the n re-promulgate d agai n i n th e Permanen t Replacement s Standard s publishe d i n th e Federa l Registe ro n Octobe r12, 2005 . Thi s documen taddresse s th e requirement s t o develo p an d submi ta Perfonnanc e Tes t Pla n se t fort h i n 4 0 C F R § 63.1207 . Thi s Performanc e Tes t Pla n i s writte n t o addres s al l applicabl e Subpar t EE E (an d Genera l Provisions ) requirement s incorporate d int o th e regulation s throug h promulgatio n ofth e Fina l Replacemen t Standard s publishe d i n th e Federa l Registe ro n Octobe r12,2005 . 

## 1. 2 Facility/Uni t Identificatio n 1.2.1 Genera l A s mentione d above , thi s Performanc e Tes t Pla n ha s bee n develope d t o evaluat e th e rotarykil n incinerato r Numbe r4 atth e Veoli a facilityi n Sauget , IL . Thi s i s a commercia l hazardou s wast e incineratio n facilitythat treat s liqui d an d soli d waste s that ar e classifie d a s bot h hazardou s an d non-hazardous . 

## 1.2. 2 Facilit

yID , Mailin g Address , Th e facilityaddres s is : Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s 7 Mobil e Avenu e Sauget , I L 6220 1 Facilit yID# : ILD09864242 4 Primar yContact s Th e facilitycontac tis : Mr . Dav e Klaric h Phone : 361-572-231 7 Email : David.Klarich@veoliaes.co m

1.2. 3 Incinerato rOvervie w Thi s incinerato ri s a rotarykil n incineratio n syste m wit h primaryan d secondar ycombustio n chamber s that treat s soli d waste s a s wel l a s aqueou s an d organi c liquids . Th e proces s i s monitore d an d controlle d bya distribute d contro l syste m (DCS ) capabl e o fcontinuousl ymonitorin g th e proces s t o assur e al l operationa l parameter s ar e withi n regulatoryan d pemii t limits whil e wast e i s bein g fe d t o th e unit . I n addition , thi s
a\rm^7\Projecls\10u02022\Veoi a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do cRevision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8

- Section : 1.0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes t Pla n Pag e 2 o f5
incinerato ri s equippe d wit h a Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g Syste m (CEMS ) tha t continuousl ysample s th e exhaus t gase s fo roxyge n an d carbo n monoxid e i n th e stac k ga s exhaus t stream . 

## 1. 3 Purpos e an d Objective s ofth e Performance Tes t 1.3.1 General Th e purpos e o fth e performanc e tes t i s t o validat e th e performanc e leve l o fth e incinerato ragains t th e requirement s i n 4 0 CF R Par t 63 , Subpar t EEE . T o thi s end , th e specifi c objective s o fthi s performanc e tes t ar e to :

•Demonstrat e tha t th e metal s emission s fro m th e incinerato rmee t th e HW C MAC Temissio n limit s

whil e treatin g hazardou s wast e fo rth e parameter s bein g tested .
•Collec t monitorin g dat a i n orde rt o re-establis h operatin g paramete rlimit s (OPLs ) o rse t ne wOPL s o n ke yoperatin g variable s that wil l ensur e tha t th e incinerato roperate s withi n th e HW C MAC Temissio n limits whil e treatin g hazardou s waste . •' Utiliz e a n extrapolatio n procedure , a s appropriate , t o establis h metal s fee d rat e limits . Th e performanc e tes t wil l includ e feedin g a variet yo fliqui d an d soli d wast e material s t o th e incinerator , samplin g an d analyzin g th e fee d streams , monitorin g certai n proces s parameter s an d conductin g emission s testing . Th e emission s standard s that wil l b e evaluate d unde rth e HW C MAC Tregulation s ar e summarize d i n Tabl e 1-1 . 

## 1. 4 Performance Test Pla n Organizatio n Thi s tes t pla n ha s bee n organize d i n a forma t typicall yuse d fo rcomplianc e demonstratio n tes t programs . Tabl e 1-2 i s include d s o that th e performanc e tes t requirement s i n th e HW C MAC Trul e ca n b e cross reference d wit h th e section s i n thi s Plan . Th e remainde rofth e documen t ha s bee n organize d a s follows :

•Sectio n 2. 0 provide s a genera l physica l descriptio n o fth e rotarykil n incineratio n syste m an d associate d uni t operation s (includin g th e ai rpollutio n contro l system ) a s wel l a s a n overvie wo fth e automati c wast e fee d cutoff(AWFCO ) syste m an d maintenanc e procedures .
•Sectio n 3. 0 present s a briefdiscussio n o fth e waste s t o b e treate d i n term s o fphysica l an d chemica l parameter s whic h impac t therma l oxidatio n an d summarize s th e hazardou s ai rpollutant s presentl y identifie d i n th e wast e streams .
•Sectio n 4. 0 present s th e Tes t Protoco l includin g planne d fee d an d tes t conditions , rational e fo rth e tes t design , anticipate d test schedul e an d fina l report format .
•Sectio n 5. 0 full ydescribe s al l samplin g an d analysi s procedure s an d associate d QA/Q C protocol s followin g th e lates t EP Aguidance . Thi s sectio n essentiall yserve s a s th e Qualit yAssuranc e Projec t Pla n (QAPP ) fo rthi s project . Th e Appendice s contai n Proces s Flo wDiagram s (Appendi xA) , example s o fperformanc e tes t fiel d dat a sheet s an d tes t equipmen t calibratio n (Appendi xB) ; an d isokineti c sampl e trai n setu p an d recover yform s (Appendi xC) .

O:\rrmi97\Praiects\10002022\Veon a Perfomianc e Tes t Ptent M R 3 052108.do c



## V E S 00264 3Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 1.0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerfomianc e Tes t Pla n Pag e 3 of5

Tabl e 1- 1 Summar yo fApplicabl e MAC TEmissio n Standard s Emission s Paramete r Limi t Citatio n Mercur y S 13 0 ug/dsc m 4 0 CF R § 63.1219(a)(2 ) Semivolatil e Metal s (SVM ) (Cadmiu m an d Lead ) < 23 0 (ig/dsc m 4 0 CF R § 63.1219(a)(3 ) Lo wVolatil e Metal s (LVM ) (Arsenic , Berylliu m an d Chromium ) £9 2 ug/dsc m 4 0 CF R § 63.1219(a)(4 ) Note : Al l emissio n concentration s ar e correcte d t o 7 % oxygen .

O:\rm»97\PrajK:ls\10002022Weoli a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R 3 052108.do c



## V E S 00264 4

### Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 1.0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit4 HW C MAC TPerfomianc e Tes tPla n Pag e 4 of5
Tabl e 1-

2 Cros s Referenc e o fPerformanc e Tes tRequirement s

Topi c Regulator yCitatio n Sectio n No . I n thi s Documen t Progra m Summar

y 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f ) an d § 63.7(c)(2Kf

) 1. 1 Tes tschedul e 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f) , (f)(1 ) M an d §63.7(c)(2)(i ) 4. 7 Data Qualit

yObjectives (DQOs ) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f ) an d § 63.7(c)(2)(f

) 5. 5 Interna l an d Externa l Qualit yAssuranc e Pla n 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f ) an d § 63.7(c)(2)(f

) 5. 9 &5.1 3 Analysi s o

ffeedstream s (as fired ) ' Heatin g value , as h content , semi-volatil e metals , lo wvolatil e metals , mercur yan d tota l chlorin e Viscosity Identificatio n an d quantificatio n o freasonabl y expected HAP s 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1)(f ) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1)(i)(A ) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1Xi)(B) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(A ) &(B ) 3. 0

Detailed engineerin g descriptio n ofcombusto r Manutacturer/make/mode l ofHW C Typ e o fHW C Maximu m desig n capacit y Fee d system s Locatio n ofcombustio n zon e temperatur e devic e Hazardou s wast

e AWFC O syste m Design , operatio n an d maintenance ofAP C Justificatio n ofalternativ e ga s flo wrat e measuremen ttechniqu e Design , operatio n an d maintenance o fstac k ga s monitorin g system s 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)( 1 )(iii)(A ) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207 (0( 1 )(iii)(B) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207 (0(1)(iii)(C) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207 (0( 1 )(iii )P ) &(E ) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207 (0(1)(xix ) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207 (0( 1 )(iii)(F ) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(f)(iii)(G ) 40 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1)(xvii ) 40 CF R § 63.1207 (0( 1 )(iii)(H) 2. 0 22. 

### 2. 2 2. 2 2. 3 2.2. 6 2.5. 1 2.4.1 1 N/ A 2. 6 Descriptio n o

fWaste handlin g an d blendin g Operation s 4OCFR§63.12O7 (0 (1)(ii)(C ) 2.3. 5 Detailed tes

t protoco l including : Descriptio n o

fsampling , monitorin g an d analytica l procedures Descriptio n o

fPlanne d Fee d an d Operatin g condition s durin g th e Performance Tes t 40CFR§63.1207 (0 (1)(iv ) 40 CF R § 63.1207 (0( 1 )(vi) &(vii ) 5. 6 &5. 8 4.3,4. 4 &4. 5 Procedures fo rrapidlystoppin g hazardou s waste fee d an d controllin g emission s durin g malfunctio n 40CFR§63.1207 (0 (1)(viii ) 2.3. 6 Determinatio n o

fhazardou s waste residenc e tim e 40CFR§63.1207 (0 (1)(ix ) 2.2. 7 Meta l fee d rat

e limi t extrapolatio n (i

fused ) 40CFR§63.1207(f)(1)(x ) 4.4. 2 Documentatio n o

fexpected level s o

fregulate d constituent

s i n otherfee d stream s tha t are no tanalyze d 40 CF R §63.1207 (0 (1)(» ) 3. 0 Documentatio n o

fconditionin g tim e neede d to reac h stead ystat

e prio rt o testin g 40CFR§63.1207 (0 (1)(xii ) 4. 6 Alternativ

e monitorin g frequencyfo rwe tscrubbers (i

f used ) 4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)( 1 )(xxiii) N/ A Othe rinformatio n deeme d necessaryb yth e agency 40 CF R § 63.1207 (0(1)(xxvii ) 

## -

Q:\m»r37V J rojecls\10002022\VeoS a Perfonnanc e Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052106.do c



## V E S 00264 5Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes t Pla n Pag e 1 o f1 7 

# 2.0 Engineerin g Descriptio n
2. 1 Proces s Overview Veoli a operate s 2 Fixe d Heart h Dua l Chambere d Incinerator s (Unit s 2 an d 3 ) an d on e rotarykil n incinerato r (Uni t 4 ) a t th e Sauget , I L facility . Th e two fixe d heart h unit s ar e rate d a t 1 6 millio n Btu/h reach . Incineratio n Uni tNo . 3 i s a mirro rimag e o fUni tNo . 2 . Bot h o fthes e unit s hav e thei row n wast e handlin g system s a s describe d i n th e section s tha t follow . Th e onl ydifferenc e bein g Uni t No . 2 i s equippe d wit h fou r(4) baghous e modules , whil e Uni tNo . 3 i s equippe d wit h thre e (3 ) baghous e modules . However , eac h incinerato ri s operate d identicall ywit h onl ythre e baghous e module s i n servic e durin g operation . Uni t4 i s rate d a t 5 0 millio n Btu/h ran d i s equippe d wit h its ow n tan k far m system , dru m storage , bul k solid s storag e an d fee d systems . 

## 2.2 Waste Fee d System s [4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(c ) an d (f)(1)(iii)(D

) an d (E)

] 2.2.1 Unit4Liqui d Wast e Feed System an d Blendin g Operations Th e Uni t4 Rotar yKil n ca n incinerat e an yo fth e wast e that Veoli a i s authorize d an d permitte d t o receive . Al l physica l form s o fwaste s wil l b e handle d an d fe d b yth e system' s wast e fee d devices . Liquid s wil l b e fe d t o eithe rth e kil n o rth e Secondar yCombustio n Chambe r(SCC) . Bul k soli d waste s wil l b e fe d t o th e kil n throug h eithe rth

e ram feeder . Containerize d waste s wil l b e fe d t o th e kil n throug h th e ra m feede ro rth e auxiliar yra m feeder . Thi s uni t ca n receiv e an ycombinatio n o fwaste s - liquid , semi-solid , o rsoli d —wit h a hea t valu e o fu p t o 5 0 millio n Btu/hr . Uni t 4 i s supporte d b ystorag e tank s locate d i n Tan k Far m #3 . Thes e tank s ar e use d to stor e th e liqui d organi c waste , aqueou s wastes , an d pumpabl e sludge s t o b e fe d to th e system . Unlike Tan k Far m #1 , al l o fth e tank s i n Tan k Far m #

3 ca n b e use d a s fee d tanks t o th e incinerator . Severa l criteri a ar e importan t i n designin g a blen d fro m receive d wastes . Thes e includ e compatibility , prope rrang e o fheatin g value , an d permi t restriction s regardin g elementa l compositio n (base d o n emissio n limitations) . Pump s t o transfe rthes e waste s t o th e syste m ar e installe d i n th e tan k farm . Th e materia l i s transferre d throug h abovegroun d pipeline s fro m th e tan k

far m t o th e incinerator. Pipeline s use d to transfe rliqui d organi c wast e an d aqueou s wast e ar e equippe d wit h strainers . I n complianc e wit h th e Benzen e NESHAP , al l tank s ar e vente d t o individua l carbo n adsorptio n canister s fo r remova l o forganic s befor e vapo ri s discharge d t o th e atmosphere . Eac h carbo n adsorbe rcaniste ri s essentiall yequivalen tto a 5 5 gallo n containe ro rgreater , ifnecessary . Al l tank s ar e equippe d wit h conservatio n vents , i n additio n t o th e carbo n caniste radsorber . Al l tank s ar e grounded , an d flam e arrester s ar e installe d betwee n th e carbo n adsorber s an d th e tanks . 2.2.1. 1 Organi c an d Aqueou s Liqui d Wast e Feed s Th e liqui d wast e injector s use d i n th e combustio n chamber s ar e air-atomizin g injectors . Thes e ar e use d fo r injectio n o fpumpabl e sludges , aqueou s waste s an d organi c liqui d waste s t o th e kil n an d fo rinjectio n o f organi c liqui d wast e t o th e SCC . Dua l fluid injectio n nozzle s wil l b e use d fo ratomizatio n o fth e waste . Eac h o f th e injector s i s rate d at 0-30 0 gph . Th e liqui d wast e fee d nozzle s ar e serve d b yparalle l redundan t pump s an d recirculatio n system s wit h bac k pressur e control .

Q:\nrw97\Projects\10002022\Veofi a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00264 6Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes tPla n Pag e 2 of1 7

2.2.1 2 

## Package

d an d Bulk Solid .' . Container s o fwaste s ar e sample d an d analyze d afte rreceip t i n accordanc e wit h th e facility' s Wast e Analysi s Plan . Thes e waste s ca n the n b e delivere d directl yt o Uni t 4 orrepacke d int o smal l combustibl e container s a t th e facility . Repackage d container s ar e delivere d to , an d staged , i n th e Containe rStorag e Uni t No . 6 adjacen t t o th e Uni t4 incinerator . Whe n schedule d fo rfeedin g t o th e system , th e container s o fwast e ar e transferre d b y forWrft s t o th e fee d conveyor s servin g Uni t 4 . Bul k solid s an d non-pumpabl e waste s ar e delivere d an d discharge d int o wast e feed , bin s i n th e Bul k Solid s Storag e Buildin g afte rbein g received , sampled , an d analyzed . Aclamshel l operatin g from a n overhea d cran e i s use d t o transfe rthes e waste s fro m th e bin s t o th e fee d hopper s dischargin g t o th e system' s ram feeder . Th e weig h hoppe ri s equippe d wit h weig h cell s s o eac h charg e o fwast e ca n b e weighe d befor e i t i s discharge d int o th e ram feeder . Fugitiv e emission s ar e controlle d b ya baghouse , cyclone , an d carbo n adsorptio n syste m connecte d t o thi s system . Th e ra m feede ri s a 25-inc h wid e by4 2 inc h hig h (insid e dimensions ) rectangula rtub e operate d b ya hydraulicall ydrive n ram . Th e ra m tub e i s equippe d wit h a vertical , hydraulicall yoperate d charg e doo rnea rth e kil n end . Thi s doo ri s opene d befor e th e ram begin s advancin g t o pus h a charg e int o th e kiln . Afte rth e ram ha s full yretracted , a limi t switc h trigger s th e doo rt o clos e s o a s t o protec t th e ra m feede rfro m th e kiln' s radian theat . Th e ra m i s capabl e o foperatin g fro m 0-3 0 cycles/hour . Th e to p fac e o fth e ram feede rha s a 2 ' x2 ' openin g whic h receive s wast e charge s fro m th e hopper . Th e ram feede risolatio n gate , th e charg e door , an d th e ra m operat e in sequence . A t th e beginnin g o fa cycle , th e ra m i s full yretracted . O n a "start " comman d fro m th e operato ro rth e programmabl e controller , th e ram feede r isolatio n gat e open s t o receiv e a charg e o fwast e fro m th e hopper . Th e gat e the n closes , th e charg e doo r opens , an d th e ra m begin s its advance . Onc e th e ra m reache s its ful l extension , i t begin s t o retract . Whe n th e ra m i s full yretracted , th e charg e doo ri s close d an d the.'cycl e ca n b e repeated . Thi s system' s sequence d operatio n combine d wit h th e negativ e pressur e i n th e kil n preven t fugitiv e emission s fro m escapin g th e kil n ra m feede rsystem . Th e ra m feede rals o receive s container s ofwaste s delivere d bya n auxiliaryfee d system . Th e auxiliaryfee d conveyo ri s capabl e o fhandlin g charg e weight s o f1 t o 10 0 pounds . Th e syste m i s capabl e o fhandlin g charg e size s u p t o 2 4 inche s i n diamete ran d 2 4 inche s tall . Th e auxiliaryfee d conveyo ri s capabl e o fmakin g 6 0 charge s a n hou ro ron e complet e cycl e ever yminute . 

## 2.2.1. 3 Specialt yLiqui d Feed s Th e Specialt yFee d Syste m associate d wit h Incinerato rNo . 4 i s a Direc tInject Liqui d Fee d System . 

## 2.3 Manufacturer , Mak e an d Mode l ofth e Incinerato r[4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(A) ] 2.3.1 Combustio n Chamberand Burner s [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(B ) and (C ) Incinerato rNo . 4 feature s a two-stag e combustio n process . Ignitio n o fwast e materia l take s plac e i n th e kiln , o rprimarycombustio n chambe r(PCC) . Asecondar ycombustio n chambe r(SCC ) serve s a s a n "after-burner " fo rproces s gase s an d i s als o permitte d to incinerat e hig h Bt u liqui d waste . Ignitio n ofth e wast e take s plac e a t temperature s i n exces s o f160 0 degree s F . Th e secondar ycombustio n chambe rmaintain s a minimu m temperatur e o fapproximatel y187 5 degree s F . Th e rotarykil n i s fabricate d o fcarbo n steel . I t ha s approximat e dimension s o f8'8 " O.D . X35 ' long . I ti s supporte d o n a one-degre e slop e b ytw o stee l tire s o rridin g rings. Eac h riding ring rides o n tw o pair s o fstee l Qlm»«7\Projects\10002022\Veori a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00264 7

### Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit 4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes t Ra n Pag e 3 of1 7
trunnion s an d hav e a n approximat e outsid e diamete ro f9 fee t 5 inches . Th e thicknes s an d fac e widt h ofth e trunnion s ar e approximatel y6 inche s an d 9 inches , respectively . Tabl e 2- 2 provide s a summar yofth e incinerato rdesig n specifications . Th e Wi n i s line d wit h approximatel y7 Vz inches o fdens e abrasion-resistan thigh-alumin a firebric k refractory . Wit h thi s refractorysystem , th e kil n ha s a n insid e diamete ro fapproximatel y7 fee t an d a lengt h o f approximatel y3 5 feet , a n integra l cross-sectio n are a o fapproximatel y3 8 squar e fee t an d a n interna l volum e o fapproximatel y1,34 6 cubi c fee t Al l kil n feed s wil l ente rthroug h th e uppe rkil n fac e plat e whic h i s locate d o n th e fee d en d o fth e kiln . Th e plat e contain s a primarybumer , thre e liqui d fee d nozzle s (fo rpumpabl e sludge , aqueou s waste , an d hig h Bt u liqui d waste) , a ra m feede ran d a surg e ven t Th e primar ybume ri s equivalen t t o a Nort h America n 'Fue l Directed ' burne ro f2 5 MMBtu/hr . an d bum s No . 2 fue l oi l o rnatura l gas . Th e burne rsyste m i s supplie d wit h approximatel y4,00 0 acf m combustio n ai ra t a stati c pressur e o f20 " wate rcolum n (WC) . Th e pilo t fo rth e primar yburne rwil l bu m natura l gas . Th e fue l syste m fo rth e kil n (an d secondar ycombustio n chamber ) i s controlle d b ya Factor yMutua l approve d bume rmanagemen t syste m complet e wit h interlock s an d safet yvalves . 

## 2.3. 2 Secondar

yCombustio n Chamber(SCC ) Th e SC C i s a vertical , cylindrica l chambe rhavin g approximat e dimension s o f10'-6 " O.D . x71 ' high . I t i s fabricate d o fcarbo n stee l an d line d wit h a n inne rcours e (hot face ) o fapproximatel ysi xinche s o fhig h alumin a refractoryan d a n oute rcours e o fapproximatel ytw o inche s o finsulatin g refractory. Wit h thi s installe d refractory , th e SC C ha s a n insid e diamete ro fapproximatel ynin e feet . Th e effectiv e lengt h (ga s retentio n length ) o fth e chambe ri s approximatel y48 ' - 6" . Consequently , th e SC C ha s a cross-sectio n are a o f6 4 squar e fee t an d a n effectiv e volum e o fapproximatel y3,08 4 cubi c feet . A t maximu m combustio n ga s flows , th e combustio n ga s residenc e tim e i s greate rtha n two seconds . Combustio n gase s fro m th e kil n ente rth e botto m ofth e SC C throug h a refractory-line d sid e duc t an d exi t fro m th e to p o fth e SC C throug h a refractory-line d duc t to th e temperin g chamber . Th e floo ro fth e chambe ri s slope d to facilitat e th e remova l o fas h an d solid s throug h a sla g tap . Th e SC C i s equippe d wit h on e burne rmounte d o n th e sidewal l o fth e chambe rnea rth e bottom , Th e bume ri s a Tran e Therma l Model , o requivalent , wit h a desig n hea t releas e o fapproximatel y3 0 millio n Btu/hr . Thi s burne ri s supplie d wit h No . 2 fue l oi l o rnatura l ga s an d combustio n air . A s wit h th e kil n burner , th e SC C burne ri s supplie d wit h atomizin g ai ran d i s equippe d wit h a burne r managemen t system . Thi s syste m control s th e ignitio n an d initiate s a n automati c shutof fwhe n ther e i s a los s o fflame , combustio n ai rsupply , fue l pressure , atomizin g ai rpressure , pilot burne ro rI D fan . Th e SC C burne ri s a high-intensity , vorte xtyp e uni t wit h a spi n van e assembly , locate d withi n th e windbo xt o impart a n intens e rotarymotio n to th e combustio n air . Thi s rotarymotio n an d th e burne rdesig n provid e complet e mixin g o fai ran d fuel , an d recirculatio n o fth e gase s withi n th e combustio n chambe rpromote s rapi d combustio n an d hig h hea t intensity .

a\rm»97\Proiecte\100d2022VVe ^ Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00264 8Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes tPla n Pag e 4 o f1 7 

## 2.3.3 Location o

fCombustio n Zone Temperatur e Devic e [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(xix)] Th e pyromete rthat monitor s temperatur e i n th e rotarykil n i s locate d top-centeri n th e transitio n sectio n betwee n fh e rotarykil n an d th e SC C abou ttw o fee t downstrea m fro m th e exi t o fth e kiln . Th e thennocoupl e that monitor s temperatur e i n th e SC C i s locate d o n th e wes t sid e o fth e chambe rnea rth e SC C exi t duc t 

## 2.3.4 Hazardous Wast e Residenc

e Time [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(ix)] Th e hazardou s wast e ga s residenc e tim e fo rth e Uni t4 Rotar yKil n Incinerato ri s calculate d a s follows :

•RotaryKil n Volum e -134 6 ft3

•Secondar yCombustio n Chambe rVolum e - 308 4 ft 3

•Tota l Volum e - 443 0 ft3

•Maximu m Flu e Ga s Flowrat e - 43,00 0 acf m (71 7 frJVsec )

•Tota l Combustio n Zon e Residenc e Tim e = (443 0 ft 3 )/(71 7 ft 3/sec ) = 6. 2 se c 

## 2.3. 5 Combustion System Leak Th e kil n itsel fi s equippe d wit h a doubl e sea l syste m tha t i s comprise d o foverlapping , adjustable , stainles s stee l sprin g plate s o n bot h th e fee d an d discharg e end s o fth e kiln . Th e sealin g edge s o feac h plat e ar e fitte d wit h a sintered-meta l wea rsho e simila rto a brak e sho e wit h th e inne rsea l restin g o n th e kil n shell . Th e powdere d meta l formulatio n fo rth e sea l shoe s includ e graphit e granules , whic h mak e th e shoe s self lubricating . Th e voi d betwee n th e seal s an d th e oute rshel l o fth e kil n i s pressurize d to furthe rpreven t fugitiv e emissions . I n additio n t o th e kil n sea l system , Uni t 4 als o utilize s a n induce d draf t fa n tha t maintain s a vacuu m o f- 0. 5 to - 1. 0 inche s wate rcolum n whil e wast e i s bein g fire d into th e system . 

## 2.3. 6 Emergenc

ySafet yVen t Uni t4 i s equippe d wit h tw o emergenc yvents , on e locate d a tth e kil n inlet whic h act s a s a n emergenc y pressur e relief , th e secon d i s locate d atth e to p ofth e SC C a s a therma l relie fvent . Th e emergenc yven ta tth e kil n inlet woul d onl yb e require d fo ra n occunenc e that overwhelm s th e abilityo f th e I D fa n to contro l th e pressur e o fth e kiln . Th e ven t an d chut e openin g i s designe d suc h that wast e fro m th e bul k solid s chut e woul d no timped e th e escapin g ga s flow . Adeflecto rseparate s th e fee d flowfro m th e ven t opening . Th e entrainmen to fsolid s throug h th e surg e ven t i s minimal . A s a n extr a precaution , th e exhaus t openin g ofth e ven ti s angle d t o provid e a horizonta l exit , thereb yminimizin g solid s entrainmen t into th e air . Th e ven t i s kep t close d byweighted louvers . Thes e louver s wil l ope n onl yi fth e pressur e i n th e kil n suddenl y rises beyon d th e compensatin g capacit yofth e I D fan . Alimi t switc h o n th e louver s wil l automaticall yshutoffal l wast e feed s t o th e kil n an d SC C whe n th e ven ti s opened . Th e incinerato ri s als o equippe d wit h a n emergenc ysafet yven t (ESV ) locate d at th e to p o fth e secondar y combustio n chamber . Thi s ES Vi s a refractory-line d emergenc ytherma l relie fven t (TRV ) whic h i s hel d i n th e close d positio n bya pneumati c cylinder . Th e contro l valv e i n th e lin e supplyin g ai rto th e cylinde ran d th e cylinde rven tvalv e whic h open s th e TR Var e locate d i n th e contro l roo m fo reac h unit . Valv e lock s (wit h key s attached ) ar e utilize d to dete rindiscriminat e operatio n o fthes e valves . Openin g o fth e TR Vallow s hot combustio n ga s to ven tfro m th e combustio n syste m durin g emergenc yshutdow n events . Th e purpos e o fth e TR Vi s t o protectth e downstrea m APC S fro m excessiv e temperatur e situations . Alimi t switc h o n th e TR V shut s of fal l wast e feed s t o th e syste m a s itsense s tha t th e ca p i s opening . Q:Vr»i97\Proie*\10rxi202WeoliaPerfo<nraric e Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do< :



## V E S 00264 9Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerfomianc e Tes t Pla n Pag e 5 o f1 7 

## 2. 4 Procedure s fo rRapidl yStoppin g Hazardou s Waste Fee d Durin g Equipmen t Malfunctio n [4

0 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(viii) ] Equipmen t malfunction s ar e identifie d b yth e contro l system , observatio n o fproces s contro l variables , o rb y regularfiel d inspections . I n th e even t o fa mino requipmen t malfunctio n (e.g . wast e fee d o rscrubbe rleaks) , th e contro l roo m operato r wil l b e notified . Th e contro l roo m operato rwil l the n clos e th e wast e fee d valve s an d disabl e th e wast e fee d pumps . I n th e even t o fmajo requipmen t malfunctio n (e.g . fire) , th e emergenc ysto p butto n locate d i n th e contro l roo m wil l b e pushed . I

fthi s butto n i s pushe d al l equipmen t wil l switc h t o its fail-saf e position . 

## 2. 5 Ai rPollutio n Contro l Equipmen t [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f)( 1 )(iii)(G) ] 2.5. 1 Ai rPollutio n Contro l Systems Description s Th e ai rpollutio n contro l syste m consist s o fa temperin g chamber , tw o spra ydrye rabsorbers , an d fabri c filte r baghous e modules . Th e ai rpollutio n contro l syste m neutralize s acidi c compound s an d removes particulat e fro m th e exhaus t gas . Tw o subsystems , th e spra ydrye rabsorbe ran d th e fabri c filter , carr you t th e chemica l neutralizatio n an d particulat e remova l functions , respectively . Athir d subsystem , th e lim e system , i s use d t o prepar e an d provid e lim e slurryt o th e spra ydrye rabsorbe rfo rus e i n th e chemica l neutralizatio n process . Th e induce d draft fa n an d stac k provid e th e mechanica l energ yrequire d t o transport th e flu e ga s throug h th e interconnectin g ductwork , to its eventua l discharg e poin t t o atmosphere . 2.5.1. 1 Temperin g Chambe r Th e temperin g chambe ri s a vertical , cylindrica l uni t designe d to coo l th e combustio n gase s usin g a serie s o f interna l dual-flui d (wate ran d air) spra ynozzles . Th e combustio n gase s ente rth e to p o fth e chamber , flow downwar d throug h th e spra ypatter n an d exi t fro m th e botto m o fth e chamber . Th e spra ypatter n i s designe d t o eliminat e direct contac t ofwate rwit h refractory , an d th e chambe ri s designe d to maintai n a drybotto m unde r al l operatin g conditions . Tha t is , th e injectio n rat e o fspra ywate ri s controlle d s o tha t it i s completel yvaporize d an d carrie d ou t o fth e chambe ri n th e combustio n gases . Th e temperin g chambe ri s approximatel y49 ' hig h wit h 11 ' I.D . an d i s fabricate d of' / inc h nomina l plat e thicknes s carbo n stee l (AST M A36 ) an d line d wit h refractory . Th e spra ynozzle s an d extension s ar e fabricate d o f30 4 S S material . Th e temperin g chambe ri s size d s o that a combustio n ga s retentio n tim e o fgreate rtha n on e secon d wil l b e maintaine d at al l ga s flows . Becaus e som e molte n particulat e material s i n th e combustio n gase s ar e coole d i n thi s proces s uni t to belo wthei rfusio n point , som e solid s ar e generate d an d collecte d i n th e chamber . Therefore , th e chambe rha s a con e botto m an d a slid e gat e to facilitat e th e remova l o fsolids . Thes e solid s ar e discharge d ont o a conveyo rsystem , whic h transport s the m to a hopper . 2.5.1. 2 Lim e Syste m Th e lim e syste m prepare s lim e slurryfo rus e i n th e chemica l neutralizatio n proces s i n sufficien t suppl yan d concentratio n to maintai n continuou s flu e ga s treatmen t i n th e spra ydrye rabsorber . Th e syste m ha s bee n designe d fo rbatc h mixin g to provid e thi s service . Hydrate d lim e i s store d i n a storag e bi n abov e th e lim e preparatio n area . Th e storag e bi n i s size d t o hol d enoug h hydrate d lim e t o maintai n severa l day s o fsyste m operatio n at th e maximu m combustio n rat e o fth e Q:\mw97\Projects\10002022\Veo5 a Performance Tes t Pla n U 4 R 3 05210 8 do c



## V E S 00265 0Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit 4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes t Pla n Pag e 6 o f1 7
incinerator . Lim e i s discharge d throug h th e conica l storag e bi n bottom . Th e flowo fth e materia l fro m th e bi n i s aide d b ya vibratin g liv e bottom, " o rbi n activator . Avariabl e spee d scre wfeede ri s use d t o mete rth e hydrate d lim e i n th e proportion s require d fo rbatc h mixin g lim e slurry . Th e lim e i s mixe d wit h wate ri n a tan k beneat h th e lim e storag e bin . Th e scre wfeede rspee d an d th e rat e that wate ri s adde d t o th e lim e slurr ytan k ar e variabl e s o that th e desire d lim e solid s concentratio n ca n b e achieve d i n th e tank . Th e variabl e fee d adjustment s allo wwate ran d lim e t o b e adde d to th e lim e slurrytan k a t a rat e that wil l allo wa batc h mod e o f mixing . A n agitato ri s provide d i n fh e slurrytan k t o mi xth e wate ran d lim e an d t o maintai n th e suspensio n o f lim e solids . Th e mixe d lim e slurryi s pumpe d a t a continuou s rate o fflo wthroug h a recirculatio n loo p t o th e S D Anozzles . 

## 2.5.1. 3 Spra y

## Dr

yAbsorbe r Uni t 4 i s equippe d wit h two Spra yDrye rAbsorber s (SDA ) locate d immediatel ydownstrea m o fth e Temperin g Chamber . Eac h SD Auni t i s fabricate d o f3/ 8 inc h carbo n steel . Th e functio n o fth e SDA s i s to :

•Furthe rcoo l th e combustio n gase s fro m 600-800° Ft o 300-500°F ,
•Neutraliz e an d remov e HC I an d othe racid s fro m th e combustio n gases , •Remov e a" portio n o fth e particulat e (fl yash ) fro m thes e gases . Slurr yflowt o eac h spra ydrye rabsorbe r(SDA ) i s rnetere d b ya flowcontro l valv e t o obtai n th e prope rfee d concentratio n to th e spra ydrye rabsorber . Manua l adjustmen t t o th e flo wi s mad e a s a functio n o fth e SD A outle t temperatur e an d a s a functio n o fth e outpu t fro m a hydrochlori c aci d (HCI ) analyze ri n th e ga s duc t downstrea m o fth e fabri c filter . Th e combine d unit s ar e size d t o remov e mor e tha n 82 0 Ib/hr . o fchlorin e fro m th e combustio n gases . Eac h SD Ai s approximatel y72 ' hig h b y107 " i n diameter . Eac h uni t include s a hea d section , an d a 60 ° conica l hopper . Eac h SD Achambe rha s on e acces s doo ri n th e uppe rsection . Eac h hoppe rha s on e acces s door , a flange d clean-ou t port , an d a drai n connection . Th e SD Ahea d sectio n consist s o fa flange d inlet connectio n an d a ho t ga s inlet plenum . Th e dual-flui d atomizin g nozzle s includ e stainles s stee l housing s an d stellite d inserts . Th e nozzle s ar e assemble d t o permi t fiel d remova l fro m th e piping . Th e two lim e slurrypipin g header s hav e automati c isolatio n valves . Combustio n gase s ente rth e to p o feac h o fthes e units , flo wdownwar d throug h a centra l duc t an d ar e disperse d symmetricall yfro m thi s duc t int o th e absorbe rchambe ra t a velocit yan d directio n that assure s optima l contac t wit h th e clou d o fatomize d lim e slurrydroplet s introduce d int o th e chambe rbydual-flui d (lim e slurr yan d air) nozzles . Th e gase s the n flowdownwar d throug h eac h absorbe rchambe ran d exi t throug h a botto m sid e duct . A s th e gase s contac t an d pas s throug h th e clou d o fatomize d lim e slurry , th e wate ri n th e slurryevaporates , coolin g th e gases . Simultaneously , th e lim e i n th e slurryreact s wit h th e hydroge n chlorid e i n th e gase s to produc e calciu m salts . Som e ofth e resultin g drymaterial , consistin g o fcalciu m salts , fl yas h an d exces s lime , fall s to th e conica l botto m o feac h unit . Th e drymateria l fro m eac h uni t i s discharge d to a conveyo rsyste m whic h transport s it t o a dum p traile ro requivalen t typ e system . 2.5.1. 4 Fabri c Filte r Ga s exhauste d fro m th e spra ydrye rabsorber s i s distribute d to tw o fabri c filte rmodule s connecte d i n parallel . Eac h modul e i s divide d into thre e compartment s connecte d i n parallel , whic h contai n multipl e fabri c filte rbag s throug h whic h th e combustio n gase s pas s t o remov e particulates . Withi n eac h compartment , th e ga s i s passe d throug h Teflon-coate d fiberglas s clot h bags . Th e ga s passe s fro m th e outsid e t o th e insid e o fth e filte r

Q:\rnv»97\Proiecls\100D2022»Veoli a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00265 1. Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MACT . Performance Tes t Pla n Pag e 7 of1 7 bags . Particulat e entraine d i n th e ga s strea m i s mechanicall ydeposite d o n th e outsid e o fth e filte rbag s a s th e ga s passe s throug h th e cloth . Eac h compartmen t ha s a clea n ai rplenu m an d housin g sectio n t o contai n approximatel y30 8 bags . Eac h ba g i s approximatel y5 " i n diamete rb y5 ' long . Th e baghouse s ar e fabricate d fro m 3/16 " mil d stee l plate , o fwelde d construction , ga s tigh t an d stiffene d t o withstan d th e maximu m operatin g negativ e pressure . Eac h compartmen t ha s a tub e shee t that support s th e bag s an d provide s fo rto p bag/cag e removal . Acces s t o th e clea n ai rplenu m i s vi a a bolte d acces s door . Eac h traile rmounte d uni t contain s th e compresse d ai rheaders, " ga s inlet an d outlet manifolds , an d th e conveyor . Th e fabri c filte rcleanin g mechanis m utilize s jet s o fai rt o clea n th e filte rbags . Periodically , th e cleanin g sequenc e wil l b e initiated . Th e sequenc e i s starte d whe n th e differentia l pressur e acros s th e filte rreache s a predetermine d setpoin t o fapproximatel y8.0 " w.c . o rwhe n th e operato rinitiate s a cycle . Th e controlle rthe n sequence s t o eac h ro wo ffilte rbag s i n eac h module , releasin g a burs t o fai ropposit e t o th e directio n o fga s flow . Th e quickl yrelease d burs t o fai rdislodge s dus t cak e o n th e exterio ro feac h ba g a s i t travel s fro m th e to p t o th e botto m o fth e bags . Release d fro m th e bag , th e dus t cak e fall s b ygravit yint o th e hoppe rat th e botto m ofth e module . Fro m ther e it i s discharge d t o a conveyo rsyste m whic h transport s i t t o a dum p trailer , o r equivalen t typ e system . Treate d b yth e spra ydrye rabsorber s an d filtere d b yth e fabri c filters , th e cleane d flu e ga s exit s th e fabri c filte r compartment s to a n outle t manifol d fo rexhaust . 2.5.1. 5 Carbo n Injectio n

' Th e carbo n injectio n syste m wil l ai rinjec t activate d carbo n int o th e plenu m immediatel yupstrea m o fth e baghouse s an d allo wfo ra mor e efficien t mean s o fcontrollin g Dioxin/Fura n an d mercui yemissions . Thi s syste m wil l b e controlle d bya n existin g PL C whic h wil l contro l th e inpu t o factivate d carbo n t o th e baghous e inlet plenum . 2 to 2 0 pound s pe rhou ro fpowdere d activate d carbo n wil l b e ai rinjecte d int o thi s plenu m an d allo wfo rdirec t contac t wit h th e stac k gase s exitin g th e SDA's . Th e amoun t o fcarbo n i s dose d i n a dust-fre e manne rint o a lo wpressur e ai rstrea m vi a pneumati c eduction . Th e educto ruse s a blowe rfo rth e motiv e air . Hig h an d lo wai rpressur e switche s ensur e that th e blowe ri s operatin g correctl yan d tha t th e carbo n deliverysyste m i s clea rfro m obstruction . Th e minimu m hig h pressur e settin g i s 4 psi g an d th e maximu m lo wpressur e settin g i s 1 inc h wate rcolumn . Th e carbon/ai rstrea m wil l the n trave l throug h pipin g to th e injectio n nozzl e int o th e ductwork . Th e carbo n wil l contac t th e ga s strea m exitin g th e SDA' s an d allo wfo rth e adsorptio n o fan ydioxin/furan s an d mercur ythat migh t b e presen t i n thi s stream . Adsorptio n wil l continue a s th e stac k gases.procee d throug h th e baghouses . Th e clea n stac k ga s wil l exi t th e fina l stac k

vi a th e induce d draf t fa n an d th e capture d solid s wil l b e discharge d fro m th e baghouse s vi a th e scre wconveyin g syste m int o a n enclose d dum p traile rfo rdisposa l a t a Subtitl e C landfill . 2.5.1. 6 Induce d Draf t Fa n an d Stac k Th e induce d draf

t fa n an d stac k

ar e locate d downstrea m o fth e fabri c filter . Combustio n gase s ar e draw n throug h th e syste m b ya 40 0 h p induce d draf t (ID) fan , rate d at 53,00 0 acf m a t 400 ° F saturated , an d 25 " wate r colum n pressure . Th e induce d draf t fa n provide s th e mechanis m fo rtransportin g th e incinerato rflu e ga s throug h th e spra ydrye rabsorber , fabri c filter , an d al l interconnectin g ducts . Th e I D fa n include s a n inlet volum e contro l dampe rt o b e use d t o contro l th e velocit yo fth e ga s withi n th e ductin g an d treatmen t devices . Treate d gase s ar e exhauste d fro m th e induce d draft fa n to th e atmospher e throug h a 100-ft . hig h stack . Th e stac k diamete rfo rUni t 4 i s 4 8 inche s I.D . Th e stac k i s equippe d wit h instrumen t samplin g port s an d a Q:\rrtw97VProjecls M 0002022\Veoi a Performance Tes t Pla n I M R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00265 2. •Revision : 0 Date : May20O 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerformanc e Tes t Pla n Pag e 8 of1 7 samplin g platfor m fo remission s testing . Figur e 5- 1 provide s detail s o n ih e desig n an d sampl e por t location s an d configuration s fo rth e stack . 

## 2.6 Stac k

Emission s Monitorin g [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(H) ] Th e continuou s emission s monitorin g (CEM ) syste m consist s o fsampl e probes , sampl e deliver yan d conditionin g apparatus , an d ga s analyzers . Sample s ar e extracte d fro m th e transitio n ductin g locate d betwee n th e I D fa n an d th e stack . ACE M performanc e tes t an d qualit yassuranc e progra m ha s bee n implemente d i n accordanc e wit h Perfonnanc e Specification s fo rContinuou s Emissio n Monitorin g o fCarbo n Monoxid e an d Oxyge n fo rIncinerators , Boiler s an d Industria l Furnace s Burnin g Hazardou s Waste , a s define d i n 4 0 CF R 266 , Appendi xIX , Sectio n 2.1 . Response s fro m eac h CEM S wil l b e fe d t o th e Contro l Syste m (CS ) wher e th e C O houri yrollin g averag e i s calculate d an d interlocke d t o th e wast e fee d cutoffvalve s a s part o fth e Automati c Wast e Fee d Cutof fSyste m (AWFCO ) discusse d i n Sectio n 2.8 , below . Th e followin g provide s a briefdescriptio n o fth e CEM S instrument s includin g th e operatin g range an d measuremen t principal . < 

## 2.6.1 CE M System Descriptio n Th e Continuou s Ernission s Monitorin g System s (CEMS ) currentl ybein g utilize d atIncinerato r4 analyze s fo r opacity , carbo n monoxide , hydroge n chloride , tota l hydrocarbon s an d oxygen . Thes e monitors , excep t opacity , ar e extractive device s mounte d i n th e ductwor k betwee n th e I D fa n an d th e stack . Th e tabl e belo w summarize s th e analyze rspecifications . Th e opacit ymonito rcontinuousl ymeasure s th e stac k ga s opacit yan d report s th e measurement s t o a n indicato ran d a recorder . A n opacit ythat exceed s a prese tlimi t trigger s a n alar m an d interlock . Carbo n monoxid e an d hydroge n chlorid e ar e monitore d wit h extractiv e non-dispers e infrare d analyzers . Tota l hydrocarbo n i s monitore d wit h a n extractiv e flam e io n detecto ranalyzer . Oxyge n i s monitore d wit h a zirconiu m oxid e cell . Stac k ga s flo wrate i s continuousl ymonitore d usin g a n anuba rthat send s a 4-2 0 m Asigna l to th e PL C whic h convert s th e signa l t o acfm . Tabl e 2- 1 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s - Continuou s Emission s Monitor s Paramete r Curren tMfg . Rang e Principl e Oxyge n COS A 0-25 % Electrochemica l Carbo n Monoxid e Echoche m M C 3 0-20 0 ppm v 0-300 0 ppm v Infrare d Tota l hydrocarbon s Thermoelectro n 0-10 0 ppm v FID/lnfrare d Hydroge n chlorid e Echoche m M C 3 0-100 0 ppm v Infrare d Opacit y Teledyn e 0-100 % Whit e ligh t Stac k ga s flow PSE/Rosemoun t 0-55,00 0 acf m Pressur e dro p

Q:\mw97\Projeds\10002022Weoi a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.do e



## V E S 00265 3Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerformance Test Ra n Pag e 9 of1 7 

## 2. 7 Proces s Monitorin g an d Contro l Th e facilityi s equippe d wit h a state-of-the-ar t monitoring an d contro l system , whic h facilitate s complianc e wit h permi t conditions , an d otherwise , collect s proces s contro l information , facilitate s efficien t operatio n an d detect s an d prevent s damag e t o th e facility . Th e syste m consist s o fthre e majo rcomponents :

•Ahuman-machin e interfac e (HMI ) system ,
•Programmabl e logi c controller' s (PLC's) , an d

•Ahig h spee d etherne t cabl e connect s al l contro l syste m component s Th e desire d contro l function s ar e implemente d throug h th e HM I system . Al l digita l contro l an d emergenc y interlocks ar e accomplishe d b yth e PLC . Th e contro l syste m i s capabl e o fmonitorin g th e "operationa l envelope " o fth e incinerato ran d i s capabl e o f performin g a numbe ro factivitie s including :

•Contro l roo m indicatio n o fprocesso rsensor s locate d withi n th e incinerato rsyste m (suc h a s pressur e indicatio n o fa fiel d installe d pressur e transmitter) ;

•Proces s controlle rfo rsingl e instrumen t loop s o ra n individua l sub-system , suc h a s a temperatur e contro l loo p involvin g a senso rreadin g fro m on e temperatur e transmitte raffectin g th e functio n o fon e temperatur e contro l valve ; an d

•Alar m fo ra n exceedanc e o fa designate d setpoint , suc h a s a hig h pressur e o rlo wtemperature . Th e proces s contro l corripute rwil l continuousl ycontro l an d monito rth e operatio n o fth e incinerator . Whe n out of-rang e condition s exist , it wil l notif yth e operato ro fthos e conditions . Th e proces s contro l compute ri s programme d to shut-dow n equipmen t (i.e. , brin g th e syste m into a saf e mode ) whe n designate d parameter s ar e exceeded , whic h i s a protectiv e mechanis m agains t potentia l equipmen t damage , operatio n outsid e o f penni t limits , o rcondition s that migh t lea d t o a releas e t o th e environment . Continuou s monitorin g ofth e incinerato ran d scrubbe rsyste m i s a n importan t aspec t o fth e syste m design . A digita l readou t o fal l monitorin g instrumentatio n i s displaye d o n th e mai n contro l screen . A n audibl e an d visua l alar m alert s th e incinerato roperato rt o significan t deviation s fro m nonna l operatin g conditions . Thi s syste m allow s a n immediat e respons e to advers e condition s b yth e operator . Automati c wast e fee d cut-offan d incineratio n shutdow n mechanism s ar e als o interlocke d wit h th e monitorin g syste m a t o rprio rt o reachin g permi t limi t levels . Monitorin g method s an d calibratio n frequencie s ar e liste d i n Tabl e 2-3 . Th e Incinerato rha s a n independen t proces s contro l compute rtha t interface s to th e Allen-Bradle y programmabl e controllers . Th e proces s compute ri s capabl e o fcontrollin g th e incinerato ri n cas e o fa failur e i n a HM I server . Thi s compute rrun s a RSVIE WHM I contro l softwar e tha t provide s operato rinterfac e to al l instrumentatio n an d controls . 

## 2. 8 Automati c Waste Fee d Cut-offSyste m [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f)( 1 )(iii)(F) ] Th e incinerato rha s a n Automati c Wast e Fee d Cut-Of f(AWFCO ) Syste m that wil l shu t wast e feed s of fi n th e even t certai n operatin g parameter s deviat e fro m allowabl e se t points . Th e PL C continuousl ymonitor s operatin g parameters , makin g adjustment s t o th e proces s a s neede d fo rprope rcontrol . Alar m logi c i s incorporate d int o th e PL C syste m to automaticall yinitiate a n AWFCO . Tabl e 2- 3 summarize s th e curren t

Q:\rrTM97tProjer^\10002022\VeoI a Performanc e Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do cRevision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit 4 HW C MAC TPerformanc e Tes t Pla n Pag e 1 0 of1 7
AWFC O se t points . AWFC O limits hav e bee n establishe d base d o n severa l factor s tha t ar e summarize d , below .

•Reaulatorv/penmi t limits - establishe d to compl ywit h existin g permits . A n exampl e o fthi s typ e o flimi t i s th e lowtemperatur e limit , belo wwhic h wast e canno t b e fe d unti l th e prope rlimi t i s re-established . I n addition , th e HW C MAC Tregulation s requir e tha t th e AWFC O syste m b e interlocke d wit h th e spa n o feac h proces s instrumen t that i s part o fth e Continuou s Monitorin g Syste m (CMS) . Alistin g o fthes e CM S instrument s an d thei rinterlocke d spa n setpoint s i s maintaine d a s part o fVeolia' s Operatin g Record .
•Proces s safet ylimit s - establishe d t o assur e proces s equipmen t i s protecte d an d unsaf e operatin g condition s d o no t occur . A n exampl e o fthi s i s inadequat e exces s ai ri n th e combustio n chambe rtha t ca n lea d t o fue l ric h conditions .
•Utilit

yo rPowe rfailur e - establishe d t o facilitat e a controlle d shutdow n o fth e proces s durin g los s o f proces s air , steam , wate ro relectricity . A n exampl e o fthi s i s th e los s o finstrumen t ai rthat i s necessar yfo rcertai n type s o fproces s instrument s t o functio n properly . Waste s wil l not b e re introduce d into th e incinerator s unti l prope roperatio n o fke yinstrument s i s re-established . I n additio n t o th e AWFC O system , operator s ca n manuall yshutdow n wast e feed s o rth e entire proces s shoul d thi s b e needed . 

## 2.8.1 AWFCO System Testin g Veoli a test s th e AWFC O system s bi-weekly . Instrumen t calibration s ar e performe d a s indicate d i n Tabl e 2-3 . I n som e case s thi s testin g occur s mor e frequentl ydependin g o n ho wofte n actua l AWFCO s occu ra t th e uni t Pe rth e require d frequency , incinerato rpersonne l chec k th e functionalit yo fAWFC O logi c that i s part o fth e incinerator' s PL C syste m t o mak e sur e tha t shoul d proces s condition s deviat e fro m allowabl e limits , th e compute rlogi c wil l initiate wast e fee d shutdown s a s required . Thi s i s accomplishe d b ymanuall ysimulatin g proces s condition s that ar e outsid e allowabl e limit s an d observin g an d documentin g whe n th e contro l o rbloc k valv e softwar e logi c o n th e wast e fee d lin e begin s to initiat e valv e closure . Shoul d actua l AWFCO s occu r durin g a give n testin g period , thes e ar e documente d b yoperatin g personne l to satisf yregulatoryrequirement s fo rsyste m testing . Result s o fthi s testin g ar e documente d o n a separat e AWFC O Testin g Lo g an d maintaine d a s part o fth e unit' s Operatin g Record . 

## 2.9 Ai rPollutio n Contro l Equipmen t Maintenance Practice s [4 0 CF R §63.1207(f){1)(iii)(G) ] 2.9.1 Progra m Overvie w Onc e equipmen t i s installe d an d operational , Veoli a utilize s a n extensiv e preventativ e maintenanc e (PM ) progra m to kee p equipmen t operationa l an d preven t breakdown s an d failures . Base d upo n th e typ e o f equipmen t an d historica l operation s an d maintenanc e experience , schedule s fo rvariou s inspectio n an d P M activitie s ar e followed . Thi s include s aspect s suc h a s documentin g detaile d maintenanc e historie s o n equipment , routin e inspectio n an d lubricatio n program s fo rhig h wea requipmen t an d non-destructiv e testin g o f pipin g an d vessel s usin g technique s lik e ultrasoun d t o asses s integrity . Th e frequenc yo fthes e activitie s varie s dependin g upo n th e equipment , P M activityan d th e incinerator' s shutdow n schedule . Fo rexample , frequen t (i.e. , weekly ) instrumen t an d certai n mechanica l equipmen t check s ar e mad e fo rcritica l proces s items . Lubrication , vibratio n analysi s an d othe rmechanica l integritycheck s ar e don e a t longe r
Q:\rtlw97\ProjectsU0002022\VeoS a Performance Tes t Pla n I M R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00265 5Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes tPla n Pag e 1 1 o f1 7 frequencie s like monthl yo rquarterly . An d finally , suc h item s a s inspectin g refractorybric k fo rwear , ar e typicall yperforme d whe n th e entire incinerato ri s shu t dow n fo rmaintenance . 

## 2.9. 2 Tes t Program Preparation Activities Prio rt o testing , instrumentatio n associate d wit h ke yparameter s o fth e tes t wil l b e checked , calibrated , o r replaced , a s appropriate , t o ensur e prope roperatio n ofth e instrumentatio n durin g testin g (i.e. , wast e fee d flowmeter s an d scales , CEM's , pressur e transmitters , thermocouple s an d pyrometers , stac k flowmeters , etc.) .

Q:\mw97\Projects\10002022\VeoS a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00265 6Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes t Pla n Pag e 1 2 of1 7
Tabl e 2- 2 Technica l Informatio n Summar yo n Incinerato rNo . 4

•Manufacture r Trad e Wast e Incineratio n Mode l No . TWI-2000 , Serie s 2 Typ e Rotar yKil n Dat e o fManufactur e 198 9 Dimension s Primar yChambe r Secondar yChambe r Externa l Lengt h 35 ' 48'6 " Externa l Diamete r 8'8 " 10'6 " Interna l Diamete r 7 ' 9 ' Cross-sectiona l are a 3 8 squar e fee t 6 4 squar e fee t Burner s Primar yChambe rBurne r Secondar yChambe rBurne r Manufacture r Nort h America n Tran e Therma l Siz e 12. 0 Millio n Btu/h r 3 0 Millio n Btu/h r Fue l Natura l Ga s Natura l Ga s Prime rMove r Induce d Draf t Fa n 4,00 0 acf m @ 400° Fsaturated , 2 0 in . wate rcolum n

Q:\rm^7\Projeols\10002022\Vet*" a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3.052108.do cRevision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes tPla n Pag e 1 3 of1 7

Tabl e 2- 3 Curren t AWFC O Parameter s an d Limit s fo rIncinerato rNo . 4

Syste m Devic e Unit s Cutof fLimit s Calibratio n Frequenc y Primar yCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e Pyromete r " F £1,24 0 (one-minut e average ) <1,50 7 (HRA 1 ) £2,40 0 (instantaneous ) Annuall y

Secondar yCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e Type K Thermocoupl e " F £1,82 5 (one-minut e average ) <1,88 6 (HRA 1 ) >2,40 0 (instantaneous ) Annuall y

Primar yCombustio n Chambe r pressur e Pressur e transmitte r in . w.c . 2 atmospheri c (instantaneous ) Quarterl y Secondar yCombustio n Chambe r pressur e Pressur e transmitte r in . w.c . t atmospheri c (instantaneous ) Quarterl y Spra yDrye rAdsorbe rInlet Temperatur e Type K Thennocoupl e ° F s 1,20 0 (on e minut e average ) Annuall y Spra yDrye rAdsorbe rOutle t Temperatur e Type K Thermocoupl e " F 5 50 0 (on e minut e average ) >43 5 (HRA ) Annuall y
Tota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e Mas s flow meter/scale s Ib/h r >426 2 (HRA ) Annuall y Tota l Wast e Feedrat e Mas s flow meter/scale s ib/h r >14,80 2 (HRA ) Annually/ Quarterl y LV M Feedrat e Mas s flow meter/scale s Ib/h r >12 0 (1 2 HRA ) Annually/ Quarterl y SV M Feedrat e Mas s flow meter/scale s Ib/h r >117(12HRA ) Annually/ Quarterl y Mercur yFeedrat e Mas s flow meter/scale s Ib/h r >0,067(12HRA ) Annually/ Quarterl y Chlorin e Feedrat e Mas s flo w meter/scale s Ib/h r >27 4 (1 2 HRA ) Annually/ Quarterl y As h Feedrat e Mas s flow meter/scale s Ib/h r >877 7 (1 2 HRA ) Annually/ Quarterl y Carbo n Feedrat e Mas s flow mete r Ib/h r > 6 (HRA ) Quarterl y Chlorin e Fee d t o Siun yFlo wRati o Flo wMete r Rati o >44. 4 Annuall y Combustio n Ga s Flo wRat e Anuba r acf m > 43,90 0 (HRA ) Annuall y Stac k Ga s Exces s Oxyge n Zirconiu m Oxid e fue l cel l 

### % £3 (on e minut e average ) Quarterl y

Q:\mw97VPrqjects\10002022\Veof e Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_0S2108.do c



## V E S 00265 8••Revision : 0 Date : May200 8

. . Section : 2. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerfonnanc e Tes tPla n Pag e 1 4 o f1 7

Syste m Devic e Unit s Cutof fLimit s Calibratio n Frequenc y Stac k carbo n monoxid e Infrare d ppmv . 210 0 (HRA ) 250 0 (on e minut e average ) Quarterl y Stac k Hydrocarbo n . FI D ppm v 21 0 (on e minut e average ) Quarterl y Stac k ga s opacit y~ Whit e Ligh t 

### % 21 0 (on e minut e average ) Quarterl y Stac k hydroge n chlorid e Infrare d ppm v 210 0 (HRA ) 250 0 (on e minut e average ) Quarterl y Liqui d feedrat e Mas s flow mete r Ib/h r 2 1,70 0 Annuall y Sludg e feedrat e Mas s flow mete r Ib/h r 2 1,10 0 Annuall y Drumme d an d Bul k

Solid s Feedrat e Scal e Ib/h r > 15,00 0 Quarterl y Baghous e lo wpressur e dro p Delt a P transmitte r in . w.c . £2 o r£1 0 (on e minut e average ) Quarterl y

1 HR Amean s "hourl yrollin g average " a s calculate d b yaveragin g th e previou s 6 0 one-minut e averag e values .

Q:^rr^7\f^'ects\10002022\Veoi a Performance Tes t Pla n U 4 R3.05210B.do c



## V E S 00265 9Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 3. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit 4 HW C MAC TPerformanc e Tes t Pla n . Pag e 1 o f6 

# 3. 0 incinerato rFeed Strea m Description s
3. 1 Genera l Veoli a treat s a broa d rang e o fwaste s an d thu s th e individua l stream s that ma ymak e u p th e incinerato roveral l fee d a t an ygive n tim e ca n var ygreatly , dependin g o n generato rproductio n an d shippin g schedules . Prio rt o schedulin g waste s fo rshipmen t t o th e facility , th e wast e stream s ar e characterize d b yth e generato ran d reviewe d b yVeoli a staff . AWast e Profil e Numbe runiquel yidentifie s eac h differen t wast e stream . Thi s assure s that onl ypre-approve d waste s ar e handle d a t th e facilityan d tha t al l necessar yregulatory , handling , safet yan d othe rimportan t infonnatio n i s availabl e t o Operation s personnel . Organi c Hazardou s Ai rPollutant s (HAPs ) measure d o rexpecte d (base d o n proces s knowledge ) t o b e presen t i n a sourc e wast e a t o rabov e approximatel y0. 1 % b yweigh t ar e liste d i n th e table s i n thi s Section . Organi c HAP S no t liste d are , base d o n proces s knowledge , believe d t o b e eithe rcompletel yabsen t o rpresen t i n th e wast e at les s tha n 0. 1 % b y weigh t I n additio n t o th e infonnatio n belo wthat summarize s fh e to p volum e wast e stream s processe d a t Veolia , Tabl e 3- 1 provide s a summar yo fth e majo rHAP s processe d at th e facility . 

## 3.2 Hig h Volum e Waste s 3.2. 1 Liqui d Waste s Liqui d waste s ar e receive d a t th e Sauge t facilityi n tan k truck s an d drum s an d ar e eithe rdirec t fe d throug h a dedicate d lin e o rar e blende d wit h othe rcompatibl e wast e stream s int o th e tan k farm . Tabl e 3- 1 provide s a summar yofth e to p volum e liqui d stream s tha t hav e bee n processe d i n th e las t year . Liqui d waste s ca n b e processe d i n an yon e o fth e thre e incinerators . Thes e stream s ca n b e organic , aqueou s o ra mixture . 3.2. 2 Bul k

Solid s Tabl e 3- 2 provide s a summar yo fth e to p bul k soli d stream s handle d a t th e Sauge t facility . Bul k solid s ca n includ e stream s lik

e contaminate d soils , wastewate rsludge s o rmanufacturin g proces s solids . Thes e waste s ar e receive d at th e sit e primaril yi n 2 0 to 4 0 cubi c yar d roll-offcontainer s o rothe rsimita rbul k transpor t vehicles . 3.2. 3 Containerize d Wast e Tabl e 3- 3 provide s a summar yo fth e to p containerize d wast e streams handle d a t Sauget . Containerize d waste s are receive d i n drum s an d smalle rcartons , boxe s o rpail s an d ca n includ e material s suc h a s laborator y waste , spen t carbon , proces s residues . 3. 3 Auxiliar yfuel s Natura l ga s o r#

2 fue l oi l ca n b e use d a s auxiliaryfuel s t o start-u p an d obtai n desire d temperature s i n th e incinerators . At thi s time , al l incinerator s us e natura l ga s a s thei rprimaryfossi l fuel . Typica l compositio n o f bot h fuel s i s provide d i n Table s 3- 5 an d 3-6 .

Q:\mw97\PiojectsV I 0002022\VeoS a Performanc e Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_05210B.do cRevision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 3. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerformanc e Tes tPla n Pag e 2 of6
Tabl e 3- 1 To p Volum e Liqui d Wast e Stream s

Profil e Wast e Nam e Annua l Pound s Receive d BZ332 8 REFLU XWATE R 3,222,36 3 38895 5 1.51 B WAST E ORGANICS/MK H 2,897,02 5 39762 8 DE175-IP AWAS H &FILTRAT E WAS H 2,192,83 2 34663 1 SEMICARBAZID E PROCES S WAST E 1,594,45 4 38885 2 BUL KMIXE D WAST E LIQUID S 1,453,76 6 39365 1 PV APRODUCTIO N 1,273.06 3 41001 3 DP20 2 949,03 5 29622 7 RINS E WATER/A G CHEMICA L 815,88 2 35107 1 BULKE D LIQUI D HIG H BT U >300 0 797,68 2 BF056 8 BUL KLIQUID S LO WBT U <300 0 753,59 5

Tabl e 3- 2 To p Bul k Soli d Wast e Stream s

Profil e Wast e Nam e Annua l Pound s Receive d 39687 1 DO G FOO D 9,682,70 4 34660 3 HYDROCARBO N TAN KBOTTOM S 3,677,04 0 56222 1 BUL KSOLI D WAST E BT U >500 0 2,638,52 0 33054 8 HYDROCARBO N WAST E FRO M

PETROL E 2,567,40 0 39677 5 WASTEWATE R TRAS H BOXES-DR Y 1,613,94 0 35107 0 CW D BULKE D INCINERATIO N SOLI D 1,610,36 0 67406 5 DRUM S &BUL KCONTAININ G GREAS E 1,557,68 0 35040 0 SMAL L PAIN TCAN S 1,380,78 0 02404 2 SURG E TAN K CLEA N OU T 1,058,00 0 36006 9 PRIMAR YSEPARATO R SLUDG E 956,98 0

Q:\rma7\Projecte\10002022WeoS a Performance Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_05210&do c



## V E S 00266 1Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 3. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit 4 HW C MAC TPerfonnanc e Tes t Pia n Pag e 3 o f6
Tabl e 3- 3 To p Containerize d Soli d Wast e Stream s

Profil e Wast e Nam e i Annua l Pound s Receive d SOL00 3 SOLID S CHLORIN E < 25 % 1,635,92 9 39548 5 NON-HA Z PRODUCTIO N WAST E PP E 1,439.51 3 CG694 4 PILO TPLAN TSOLVENT S 1,026;87 7 BB144 5 RE P LA B PAC K(DCN ) 858,46 7 LOP00 3 LOOS E PACK S O F NON-REGULATE D 855,39 6 39339 9 PHARMACEUTICAL S (DEA ) 771,07 8 39375 8 Q8-606 1 SILOXAN E DRUM S 648,24 0 36016 9 M86 5 ROUND S 646,79 6 34666 2 FLAMMABL E LA B WAST E 579,68 5 64000 4 PHARMACEUTICA L SAMPLE S 567,96 1 PZLOP 4 LOOS E PACK S O F NON-RE G USE D 548,42 5 57975 1 SHARP S WIT H CONSUME R PRODUCT S 547,09 8

Tabl e 3- 4 Summar yo fMajo rHAP s Processe d

HA P C A S Numbe r Annua l Pound s Receive d Toluen e 108-88- 3 1,692,44 0 Methano l 67-56- 1 1,534,59 9 Acetonitril e 75-05- 8 654,93 9 Xylen e (mixe d isomers ) 1330-20- 7 595,372 Methy l isobuty l keton e 108-10- 1 515,31 0 n-Hexan e 110-54- 3 348,99 4 Acrylonitril e 107-13- 1 329,24 8 Methy t ethy l keton e 78-93- 3 201,43 1 Methy l tert-buty l ethe r 1634-04- 4 188,21 9 Hydrazin e 302-01- 2 180,23 8

Q:\mw97\Projeds\10002022Weoli a Performance Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00266 2Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 3. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes t Pla n Pag e 4 of6
Tabl e 3- 5 Typica l Propertie s fo rSupplementa l Fue l Oi l Paramete r Unit s Valu e Paramete r Unit s Valu e HeatValu e Btu/l b > 17.00 0 Chromiu m pp m 2. 0 As h Conten t %w t <5. 0 Lea d pp m <2 0 Chlorid e Conten t %w t <2. 0 Mercur y pp m N/ A Antimon y pp m <1. 0 Nicke l pp m <1 0 Arseni c pp m <1. 0 Seleniu m pp m <0. 1 Bariu m pp m <2. 0 Silve r pp m <0. 1 Berylliu m pp m <2. 0 Thalliu m pp m <0.0 5 Cadmiu m pp m <5. 0
Tabl e 3- 6 Typica l Propertie s fo rNatura l Ga s Componen t Unit s Valu e I Componen t Unit s Valu e Methan e mol e % 94.42 8 | Heptane s mol e % 0.01 9 Ethan e mol e % 3.08 1 Octane s mol e % 0.00 5 Propan e mol e % 0.58 2 Nitroge n mol e % 0.70 3 Isobutan e mol e % 0.08 7 Carbo n Dioxid e mol e % 0.82 4 N-butan e mol e % 0.12 9 Heliu m mol e % 0.01 4 Isopentan e mol e % 0.04 0 Hydroge n mol e % 0.02 3 N-pentan e mol e % 0.03 2 Argo n mol e % 0. 0 Hexane s mol e % 0.02 9 Oxyge n mol e % 0.00 4 Paramete r Unit s Valu e Paramete r Unit s Valu e Hea t Content , gross , dry Btu/C F 1040. 5 Relativ e Densit y 

## - 0.59 2 Hea t Content , gross , sa t Btu/C F 1023. 6 Wobb e Inde x 

## - 133 0

O:Vriw97tProjeas\10002022\VeoS a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00266 3Revision : 0 Date : Ma y2008 Section : 4. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerfonnance Tes tPla n Pag e 1 o f1 2 

# 4.0 Performanc

e Test Protoco l 4. 1 Genera l Descriptio n Thi s Performanc e Tes tPla n ha s bee n designe d t o demonstrat e performanc e unde ra singl e tes t condition usin g a combinatio n o factua l an d spike d feeds . Thi s tes t conditio n wil l b e designe d t o establis h maximu m metal s fee d rate s whil e demonstratin g conformanc e wit h applicabl e HW C MAC Tmetal s emission s standards . Durin g th e performanc e test , Veoli a wil l b e seekin g t o establis h ne wOperatin g Limit s fo rUni t 4 . Du e t o this , Veoli a wil l adjus t th e limit s a twhic h th e AWFC O syste m activate s excep t fo rcarbo n monoxide . A t th e en d o f eac h da yo ftesting , cunen tAWFC O limit s wil l b e reinstate d bac k t o currentl yestablishe d limits . 

## 4. 2 Performance Standard s Th e Performanc e tes t fo rth e Veoli a incinerato rha s bee n designe d t o demonstrat e complianc e wit h curren t performanc e standard s ofth e Hazardou s Wast e MAC Trul e a s follows :

•Conformanc e wit h th e mercur yemissio n limi t o f13 0 pg/dsc m correcte d t o 7 % oxygen ;

•Conformanc e wit h th e semivolatil e meta l (cadmiu m an d lead ) emissio n limi t o f23 0 pg/dsc m correcte d t o 7 % oxygen ; an d

•Conformanc e wit h th e volatil e meta l (arsenic , berylliu m an d chromium ) emissio n limi t o f9 2 pg/dsc m correcte d t o 7 % oxygen . 

## 4. 3 Tes t Condition s [4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1 )(vi) an d (vii) ] Th e tes t condition fo rthi s performanc e tes t i s designe d to demonstrat e complianc e wit h th e applicabl e MAC T metal s emission s standards . Uni t4 wil l b e operate d at norma l combustio n zon e temperature s durin g thi s conditio n wit h norma l wast e fee d rates . Th e flue ga s flo wrat e an d chlorin e fee d rat e wil l b e maximized . Th e baghous e inle t temperatur e wil l b e maximized . Th e propose d operatin g limit s fo rth e performanc e tes t ar e summarize d i n Tabl e 4-1 . 

## 4.4 Waste Fee d Spikin g In orde rto demonstrat e th e require d performanc e criteri a fo rthi s program , i twil l b e necessar yt o fortif y(spike ) th e incinerato rfeed s wit h organi c an d inorgani c constituents . Th e spikin g level s an d approac h propose d fo r thi s performanc e tes t hav e bee n use d successfull yi n th e pas t fo rtestin g a tnotonl yVeoli a bu t fo rtestin g a t othe rhazardou s wast e combustio n facilitie s a s well . Eac h spike d materia l wil l b e prepare d t o a know n specificatio n an d verifie d b ya certificat e o fanalysis . Thes e material s wil l b e prepare d an d fe d i n a manne rthat assure s a veryconsisten t feedrate . Fee d rate s o feac h spike d compoun d ar e chose n to b e wel l abov e expecte d level s i n nativ e wastes , generall ya n orde ro f magnitud e o rmor e higher , s o that th e spike d constituen ti s th e dominan t fee d an d th e nativ e contributio n i s not significant . Spikin g rates ar e als o selecte d base d o n historica l performanc e to assur e tha t emission s ca n b e detecte d an d actual results , versu s non-detec t results , ar e use d i n calculatio n remova l efficiencies .

Q:\mw97\Projecls\10002022Weori a Performance Tes tPla n I M R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00266 4•' Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8

. Section : 4. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes t Pla n Page 2 of1 2 

## 4.4. 1 Inorganic Constituent s Severa l metal s wil l b e spike d to th e syste m t o permi t calculatio n o fsyste m remova l efficiencie s (SREs) , whic h ca n the n b e use d t o determin e appropriat e fee d rat e limits , a s necessary ! Regulate d metal s ma yb e fe d a t som e leve l i n th e nativ e wast e material s t o b e use d durin g th e test . However , thes e nativ e concentration s ma y no t b e hig h enoug h t o achiev e fh e desire d fee d rat e limit s t o b e se t fo rth e system . Therefore , Veoli a plan s t o spik e thre e surrogat e metal s at highe rtha n norma l rates t o ensur e tha t sufficien t metal s ar e fe d t o achiev e measurabl e emission s i n th e stac k emissions . Tabl e 4-

2 provide s a n overal l summar yo finformatio n relevan t t o th e metal s testin g portio n o fth e program . S R E dat a fro m previou s tes t program s hav e bee n use d i n conjunctio n wit h presen t fee d rat e limit s an d presen t MAC Temissio n limit s to specif ytarge t fee d rate s that wil l resul t i n acceptabl e emissio n rates . Thi s tabl e i s onl yuse d a s a predictiv e tool , however , an d fina l limit s t o b e impose d wil l depen d o n th e actua l result s ofth e performanc e test . Tw o othe rpoint s ar e wort h notin g wit h regar d t o Tabl e 4-2 :

•Th e spike d amoun t fo ra give n meta l wil l b e th e differenc e betwee n th e desire d fee d rat e limi t an d th e nativ e quantityexpecte d t o fe d durin g th e test ; an d

•Surrogat e metal s wil l represen t th e whol e grou p (i n th e cas e o fLV M an d SVM ) an d tes t result s wil l b e use d t o extrapolat e u p to th e applicabl e MAC Tstandard . Th e thre e metal s t o b e spike d ar e representativ e o fth e thre e classe s o fmeta l volatilityan d therefor e ca n b e use d t o se t limits fo ran ymetal s no t spiked . 4.4. 2 Spikin g forth e LV M Categor y Th e LV M Categor yfo rincinerator s include s arsenic , berylliu m an d chromium . Veoli a plan s to spik e chromiu m at 40-4 5 Ib/h rt o establis h a SR E fo ral l thre e tes t runs . Th e SR E demonstrate d durin g th e performanc e tes t fo rchromiu m wil l b e use d t o establis h a LV M fee d rat e limit . Chromiu m wil l b e spike d a s chromi c aci d throug h a liqui d fee d injecto rvi a a pumpin g statio n that wil l monito r th e fee d rate . N Wast e chromi c aci d i s treate d at Veoli a an d thus , spikin g chromi c aci d durin g th e performanc e tes t i s representativ e o fnonna l operations . 4.4. 3 Spikin g forth e SV M Categor y Th e SV M categor yfo rincinerator s include s cadmiu m an d lead . Veoli a plan s to spike lea d a t 60-6 5 Ib/h rdurin g th e performanc e tes t to establis h a SR E fo ral l thre e runs . Th e SR E demonstrate d durin g th e performanc e tes t fo rlea d wil l b e use d to establis h a SV M fee d rat e limit . Lea d wil l b e spike d a s lea d nitrate an d delivere d i n small , pre-measure d plasti c baggie s a t regula rinterval s alon g wit h othe rsoli d wast e feed s durin g th e performanc e test . Lea d containin g wast e tha t ar e normall y treate d a t Veoli a ar e predominantl ybul k o rcontainerize d solid s an d thus , thi s spikin g approac h durin g th e performanc e tes t i s representative o fnorma l operations . 4.4. 4 Spikin g fo rMercur y Fo rmercury , th e onl yhig h volatil e metal , Veoli a plan s t o spik e thi s at approximatel y0.0 1 - 0.0 2 Ib/h ran d wil l follo wa simila rapproac h a s note d abov e fo rth e othe rMACT-regulate d metals . Mercur ywil l b e fe d a s a mercuri c nitrat e solutio n at regula rinterval s alon g wit h othe rsoli d feed s durin g th e performanc e test . Mercur y i s predominantl ypresen t i n soli d feed s processe d at Veoli a an d usin g a liqui d solutio n fo rspikin g wil l provid e Q:\mw97\Projecls\10002022\Veoli a Perfomiance Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_052108.rJo c



## V E S 00266 5Veoli a E S Technica l Solufion s Unit 4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes t Pla n

a n easil yvolatilize d for m fe d alon g wit h othe rsoli d feed s i n a manne rtha t i s representativ e o fnorma l operations . 

## 4. 5 Metal s Extrapolatio n Metho d Veoti a plan s t o extrapolat e t o highe rfee d rat e limit s tha n actuall yfe d durin g th e tes t usin g th e performanc e tes t -establishe d SREs . Thi s i s appropriat e sinc e i t i s generall yagree d tha t SRE s a t highe rfee d rate s woul d b e a t leas t a s goo d a s thos e observe d a t th e lowe rlevel . An yextrapolatio n performe d wil l tak e int o consideratio n th e MAC Tstandard s t o ensur e ful l compliance . Base d o n previou s discussion s wit h EP ARegio n 5 , th e followin g approac h wil l b e used . Th e averag e SR E fo rth e thre e run s woul d b e calculate d fro m th e fee d an d emissio n rate s fo reac h ru n an d a n averag e SR E fo rth e performanc e test . Afee d rat e limi t woul d the n b e calculate d fo reac h meta l categor yb y dividin g 75 % o fth e emissio n standar d fo rthat categor yb yth e SR E fo rth e spike d compoun d representin g tha t category . Asimila rapproac h woul d b e followe d fo rSV M (cadmiu m an d lead ) an d fo rmercury . T o furthe r assur e that thi s metho d i s protective , Veoli a propose s t o limi t th e maximu m feedrat e fo ran yon e categor yt o 1 0 time s th e spike d fee d rat e durin g th e performanc e test . Th e tes t progra m wil l establis h 12-hou rfee d rat e limit s fo rth e MAC Tmetals . Exampl e calculation s ar e sho wbelow : Maximu m emissio n rate fo rextrapolatio n

= (emissio n standard (ug/m 3@ 7 % Oz ) * 0.75 * ( W(dscf m @ 7 % Oz ) * 0.0283 m 3 ffi 3 * 60 min/hrV(453. 6 g/l b * 10 6pg/g ) Maximu m extrapolate d fee d rate

= Maximu m emissio n rate / (1 - SR E fro m performanc e test ) 

## 4. 6 Description , Preparatio n an d Deliver yo fFeed s fo rth e Performance Test [4 0 CF R § 63.120

7 (f)(1)(vi) an d (vii)

] T o th e exten t possibl e (an d wit h th e exceptio n o fth e spike d constituent s note d above) , onl ynomia l wast e material s processe d at th e facilitywil l b e fe d t o th e incinerato rdurin g th e tes t program . Wast e material s wil l b e stockpile d t o mee t th e objective s fo rth e targe t performanc e tes t parameters . Thes e waste s wil l b e characterize d i n advanc e o fth e tes t an d kep t unti l needed . Al l wast e material s wil l b e delivere d t o th e facility i n accordanc e wit h routin e operatio n an d currentl ypermitte d procedure s a s describe d elsewher e i n thi s document . 

## 4. 7 Conditionin g Tim e Neede d t o Reac h SteadyState [4 0 CF R § 63.1207(f)(1)(xii) ] Th e incinerato rwil l b e operate d fo r1 5 minute s a t th e desire d fee d rate s an d operatin g condition s befor e samplin g begin s fo ra give n conditio n o fth e performanc e test . Thi s wil l assur e al l operatin g parameter s ar e stabilize d a

t th e desire d setting s to achiev e stead ystat e befor e sampiing . 

## 4. 8 Anticipate d Test Schedul e Th e performanc e tes t wil l b e performe d ove ra 4-da yperio d usin g a three-perso n fiel d cre waccordin g t o th e schedul e show n i n Tabl e 4-3 . Fo rthi s performanc e test , i t i s anticipated tha t al l run s wil l b e approximatel ytw o hour s i n duration , a s dictate d byth e sampl e ru n tim e require d fo rmetal s measurements . Th e performanc e tes t progra m fo rthi s incinerato ri s planne d t o start o n o rafte rAugus t 1,2008 . Q:\mw97\ftoiecls\10002022\Veoli a Performance Tes t Pla n I M R3_05210B.do c Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 4. 0 Pag e 3 o f1 2



## V E S 00266 6Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 4. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit 4 HW C MAC TPerformance Tes t Pla n Pag e 4 of1 2 

## 4. 9 Performanc e Test Reportin g Th e fina l report wil l b e prepare d fo rsubmitta l n o late rtha n 9 0 day s fro m completio n o fth e fiel d tes t program . Thi s documen t wil l provid e a concis e presentatio n o fperformanc e tes t result s an d wil l includ e al l necessar y supportin g documentation . A n exampl e outlin e ofth e fina l performanc e tes t report i s presente d below : Sectio n 1. 0 Certificatio n - Include s projec t title , statemen t o fcomplianc e an d project approva l signature s Sectio n 2. 0 Summar yo fTes t Result s - Summar yo femissio n result s compare d t o applicabl e standards ; interi m statu s operatin g limits ; overvie wo fproces s operatin g conditions ; Sectio n 3. 0 Projec t Overvie w- Facilit yan d uni t description ; project backgroun d an d scope ; tes t requirements ; tes t chronolog yan d report organizatio n Sectio n 4. 0 MAC TNotificatio n o fComplianc e - Regulator yrequirements ; performanc e tes t result s an d complianc e determination ; are a o rmajo rsourc e determination ; descriptio n o fai rpollutio n contro l system ; an d descriptio n o fproces s monitorin g system s Sectio n 5. 0 Proces s Operatin g Condition s - Overvie wo ftes t condition s an d summar yo ffacility proces s monitorin g dat a Sectio n 6. 0 Samplin g an d Analytica l Progra m Overvie w- Summar yo fpropose d plan s an d discussio n o factua l activitie s an d an yrequire d deviation s fro m pla n Sectio n 7. 0 Tes t Result s - Detaile d presentatio n o fwast e analysi s an d stac k samplin g result s includin g tabulate d presentatio n o fal l dat a Sectio n 8. 0 Qualit yAssuranc e / Qualit yContro l - Detaile d discussio n o fwast e an d stac k samplin g an d analytica l QA/Q C procedure s an d result s APPENDICE S A- Facilit yProces s Monitorin g Dat a B - Spikin g Repor t C - Fiel d Samplin g Documentatio n D - Analytica l Dat a Report s

Q.Army97\Projeds\10002022WeoS a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_OS2ios.do cRevision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 4. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Unit 4 HW C MAC TPerformanc e Tes t Ra n Pag e 5 o f1 2
Tabl e 4- 1 MAC TOPL s t o b e Establishe d Durin g th e Performanc e Tes t

Proces s Paramete r Unit s Avg . Perio d Ho wLimi t Establishe d Expecte d Limi t Maximu m Flu e Ga s Flowrat e acf m 1-h r Averag e o fmaximu m HRA s fo reac h ru n 40,00 0 - 45,00 0 Maximu m Lo wVolatil e Metal s (LVM ) Fee d Rat e lb/h r 12-h r Averag e ofth e averag e HRA s fo reac h ru n 40 0 - 45 0 Maximu m Tota l Pumpabl e LV M Fee d Rat e Ib/h r 12-h r Averag e ofth e averag e HRA s fo reac h ru n 40 0 - 45 0 Maximu m Semi-Volatil e Metal s (SVM ) Fee d Rat e Ib/h r 12-h r Averag e o fth e averag e HRA s fo reac h ru n 60 0 - 65 0 Carbo n Fee d Rat e Ib/h r 1-h r Averag e ofth e averag e HRA s fo reac h ru n 6- 7 Maximu m Chlorine/Chlorid e Fee d Rat e Ib/h r 12-h r Averag e o fth e tes t ru n average s 250-35 0 Maximu m Tota l Mercur yFee d Rat e Ib/hr . 12-h r Averag e o fth e tes t ru n average s 0.1-0. 2 Maximu m Fabri c Filte rInle t Temperatur e ° F 1-h r Averag e ofth e tes t ru n average s 400-44 0

Q:\rtM«7\Prcie(^M0O02022\Veoli a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3JD52108.do c



## V E S 00266 8Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 4. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t4 HW C MAC TPerfomianc e Tes t Pla n Pag e 6 o f1 2
Tabl e 4- 2 Metal s Evaluatio n Pla n

Meta l Historica l Desire d

Fee d Rang e Fee d Rat e (lb/hr) Limi t(Ib/hr ) •Expecte d Spike d Quantit y (lb/hr) Expecte d

Meta l SR E (% ) Project © Rat e at t Feed R (lb/hr) d Emissio n I

li e Desire d at e Limi t ug/m 3 @ 7%O z Mercury 0. 1 0.02 85.00 % 0.002 3 3 SV M 60 0 - 65 0 60-7 5 99.9999 % 0.00 1 14. 5 Chromiu m * 400-45 0 40-4 5 99.9999 % 0.000 5 10.0 , Assumptions : Q s = stac k

ga s flowrate = 18,60 0 dscf m O2-stackoxyge n leve l = 12. 0 %vol . MAC TStandards : SV M (C d an d Pb) = 23 0 pg/m 3 LV M (As , B e an d Cr ) = 9 2 pg/m 3 Mercur y= 13 0 ug/m 3

* Surrogate metal s to be spike d durin g th e 200 8 Performanc e Tes t

Q:\nw97tf>rcjects\10002022\Veoli a Perfomianc e Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00266 9Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s Uni t 4 HW C MAC TPerfonnanc e Tes t Pla n Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 4. 0 Pag e 7 of1 2

Tabl e 4-

3 Anticipate d Metal s Performanc e Tes t Schedul e Genera l Overvie wo fPlanne d Schedul e Activit y Schedul e Mobilization , sit e safet ytrainin g an d set-u p Da y1 Preliminar ytraverses , Conduc tRu n 1 an d Ru n 2 Da y2 Conduc tRu n 3 Day 3 Equipmen tremova l an d depar t sit e Da y4
Exampl e o fDetaile d Dail ySchedul e (Da y2 Above ) Tes tActivit y Tim e Incinerato rline d ou to n tria l bu m waste s 07:0 0 Begi n meta l spikin g 08:3 0 Initiate al l stac k

samplin g an d wast e samplin g 08:4 5 Approx . en d tim e fo rsamplin g run s 15:0 0 Recover yo fsamplin g trai n 15:00-16:3 0 Depar tSit e 17:0 0

O:\mw97\Prt3ects\10002022\Veolra Performance Tes tPla n I M R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00267 0Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Performanc e Tes t Pla n Page1of3 7 

# 5. 0 Samplin g an d Analytica l Progra m Qualit yAssurance/Qualit

y Contro l

Thi s sectio n present s th e Qualit yAssuranc e an d Qualit yContro l goals , objectives , an d procedure s fo rth e MAC TPerformanc e Tes tprogram . Th e qualit yassurance/qualit ycontro l procedure s an d criteri a fo rthi s progra m wil l compl ywit h th e requirement s o fthi s documen t an d it s updates . Th e analytica l wor k conducte d wil l incorporat e th e QA/Q C requirement s ofth e approve d methods . Thi s documen t ha s bee n prepare d usin g availabl e guidanc e provide d i h th e followin g EP Adocuments :

•"EP ARequirement s fo rQualit yAssuranc e Projec t Plans" , EP AQA/R-5 , Novembe r1999 . •"Componen t 2 - Ho wto Revie wa Qualit yAssuranc e Projec t Pla n (includin g Attachmen tA- Generi c Tria l Bu m QAPP" , Hazardou s Wast e Combustio n Uni tPermittin g Manual , U.S . EP ARegio n 6 , Januar y1998 .
•"Handboo k

- Qualit yAssurance/Qualit yContro l (QA/QC ) Procedure s fo rHazardou s Wast e Incineration " (EPA/625/6-89/02 3 Januar y1990) .

Qualit yAssuranc e Projec t Pla n fo rVeoli a E S Technica l MAC TMetal s Performanc e Tes to n th e Rotar y Kil n Incineratio n Numbe r4 Facilit yI D Number : ILD09864242 4 Prepare d for : Veoli a E S Technical , 7 Mobil e Avenue , Sauget , I L 6220 1 Prepare d by : ENS R Corporation , Westford , M A0188 6 Revisio n No. : 0 Date : Ma y200 8

Q:\rflw97\Projecls\10002022\VeoB a performance Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.do cRevision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t4 HW C Performanc e Tes tPla n Pag e 2 of3 7 

## 5.1 Titl e Pag e 5.1.1 Projec

tTitl e Qualit yAssuranc e Projec tPla n fo rVeoli a E S Technica l Solution s HW C MAC TMetal s Performanc e Tes tPla n fo rth e Rotar yKil n Incineratio n Syste m 

## 5.1. 2 Expecte

d Performanc

e Tes tDat e O n o rafte rAugus t1,2008 . 

## 5.1. 3 Projec

tApproval s

Veoli a Projec tManage rDat e

ENS R Projec tManage rDat e

ENS R Q AOffice rDat e

Maxxa m Analytic s La b Service s Coordinato rDat e

ata»S71PrDjecls«0002022\Veoli a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00267 2Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Perfomianc e Tes t Pla n Pag e 3 of37 

## 5.2 Tabl e ofContents | Acomplet e tabl e o fcontents , includin g listing s o ftable s an d figure s an d acronym s i s presente d a t th e beginnin g o fthi s Performanc e Tes t Pla n an d include s al l pertinen t informatio n applicabl e t o thi s QAP P section . 

## 5.3 Project Descriptio n Thi s project wil l consis to fa comprehensiv e samplin g an d analysi s progra m designe d t o demonstrat e complianc e wit h th e HW C MAC Trul e requirements . Testin g wil l b e performe d unde ron e proces s operatin g condition , entailin g triplicat e samplin g runs . Operatin g paramete rlimit s (OPLs ) associate d wit h metal s emission s testin g wil l b e re-establishe d o rmodifie d base d o n th e result s ofth e program . Th e reade ri s referre d t o Section s 1.3,1.4,2.5. 3 an d 4. 0 fo rfurthe rdetail s o n progra m scope , tes t objective s an d targe t parameter s fo remissio n measurement s an d proces s monitoring . Th e remainde ro fthi s sectio n outline s th e detaile d measure s tha t wil l b e followe d t o ensur e colleclio n o fvali d data . Abrie fovervie wo fth e measurement s t o b e mad e durin g th e tes t progra m i s provide d i n Tabl e 5-1 . Amor e detaile d summar yofth e samplin g an d analytica l progra m i s provide d late ri n Sectio n 5.6 . 

## 5.4 Project Organizatio n Th e ENS R Projec t Manager , Mr . Jeffre yGorma n wil l b e responsibl e forth e overal l directio n o fthi s progra m an d wil l report to th e Veoli a Projec t Manager , Mr . Davi d Klarich . Mr . Gorma n wil l b e responsibl e fo rprojec t desig n an d implementation , communicatin g wit h th e client , schedulin g al l activities , reviewin g all , projec t dat a an d preparin g al l reports . H e wil l b e assiste d i n th e oversigh t o fQualit yAssuranc e activitie s b yth e progra m Qualit yAssuranc e Office r(QAO ) an d eac h Analytica l Laborator yService s Coordinato r(LSC) . Eac h contrac t laboratorywil l hav e on e individua l designate d a s th e perso n responsibl e fo rprojec t activities . 5.4. 1 QAOfficer' s Responsibilitie s Mr . Crai g Doolittl e wil l serv e a s th e projec t Qualit yAssuranc e Office r(QAO ) an d wil l b e responsibl e fo rrevie w an d approva l o fth e Qualit yAssuranc e Projec t Pla n presente d i n thi s section , a s wel l a s an ysubsequen t revisions . H e wil l monito rimplementatio n o ffiel d an d laboratoryactivities , schedulin g performanc e and/o r syste m audit s a s warranted . Th e QA O wil l report to th e Projec t Manage ro n an ycondition s note d whic h ma y adversel yaffec t dat a quality . Mr . Doolittl e wil l provid e independen t oversigh t fo rdat a verificatio n an d dat a qualityassessmen t activities . H e wil l prepar e a sectio n fo rth e Fina l Repor t summarizin g QA/Q C activitie s an d provid e a n overal l evaluatio n o f dat a quality . 5.4.2 Laborator yCoordinato rResponsibilitie s Eac h analytica l laboratorywil l designat e a Laborator yService s Coordinato r(LSC) , wh o wil l b e th e principa l poin t o fcontac t fo rth e ENS R Projec t Manager . Th e LS C wil l revie wQ Arequirement s wit h al l laborator ystaff to ensur e that al l require d measure s ar e take n to mee t dat a qualityobjectives . The ywil l monito rth e shipmen t an d receip t o fsamples , trac k analytica l progres s an d revie wdat a a s reporte d fro m th e laboratorie s fo r completeness . Eac h LS C wil l b e responsibl e fo rvalidatio n o fal l dat a generate d b yth e laborator yfo rthi s progra m an d wil l provid e al l necessar ydocumentatio n fo rinclusio n i n th e fina l report .

Q:VrrMi97lProjecls\10002022\Veoli a Performance Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00267 3Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t 4 HW C Performanc e Tes t Pla n 

## 5.5 QA/Q C Progra m Objective s 5.5.1 Precision , Accurac yan d Completeness Th e collectio n o fdat a t o full ycharacteriz e th e incinerato rwast e fee d material s an d stac k ga s emission s require s tha t samplin g an d analysi s procedure s b e conducte d wit h propertyoperate d an d calibrate d equipmen t b ytraine d personnel . Q Aobjective s fo rmeasurement s mad e i n th e fiel d ar e summarize d i n Tabl e 5-2 . Q A objective s specifi c t o eac h analytica l methodolog yperforme d b yth e subcontracto rlaboratorie s ar e presente d late ri n Sectio n 5.9 . Th e overal l progra m ha s bee n designe d wit h consideratio n o fsamplin g parameter s an d analytica l limit s t o ensur e that th e achieve d MDL s fo remission s wil l b e mor e tha n adequat e fo rregulator ylimi t decisions . Critica l MD L determination s ar e addresse d subsequentl yi n Sectio n 5.5.3 . Precisio n i s define d a s a measuremen t o fmutua l agreemen t amon g individua l measurement s mad e unde r prescribe d simila rconditions . Precisio n i s expresse d i n term s o frelative percen t differenc e (RPD ) betwee n dupficat e determination s an d i n term s o frelativ e standar d deviatio n (RSD ) whe n 3 d rmor e determination s ar e made . Overal l precisio n fo ranalysi s o fth e wast e fee d stream s wil l b e assesse d throug h th e analysi s o fon e se t o fduplicat e sample s fo reac h designate d parameter . Accurac yi s th e degre e o fagreemen t o fa measuremen t wit h a n accepte d referenc e o rtru e value . Analytica l accurac ywil l b e measure d throug h th e recoverie s o fmatri xspikes , analysi s o fstandar d referenc e material s o r audi t sampl e analysis . Matri xspik e sample s fo rth e wast e fee d wil l b e prepare d b yspikin g know n amount s o f targe t analyte s int o a portio n o fth e sampl e Recoverie s ar e monitore d t o asses s laborator yan d metho d accuracy . Laborator ycontro l sample s (LCS ) wil l als o b e use d to distinguis h betwee n metho d performanc e an d matri xeffect s o n accuracy . LC S an d M S spikin g solution s wil l b e independen t fro m calibratio n standards . Completenes s i s a measur e o fth e amoun t o fvali d dat a obtaine d compare d t o th e amoun t that wa s expecte d unde rnorma l conditions . Th e overal l progra m objectiv e i s t o obtai n vali d dat a fo rthre e (3 ) runsifo reac h tes t condition . Fo ral l dat a considere d critica l t o th e investigation , a completenes s objectiv e o f100% ha s bee n established . A s a result , critica l prioritydat a fro m eac h o fthre e (3 ) run s shoul d achiev e th e precisio n an d accurac ygoal s establishe d herein . Thi s completenes s criterio n applie s t o al l permi t parameter s i n emission s sample s a s wel l a s feed/proces s strea m samples . Individua l sample s fo rwhic h th e critica l dat a point s d o no t achiev e accurac yand/o rprecisio n dat a qualit yobjective s ma yrequir e reanalysis . Result s fo rsample s wher e matri xinterference s preclud e meetin g objective s fo rth e recoverie s o fsurrogate s o rspike s wil l b e evaluate d fo r potentia l bia s to calculate d emissio n results . I n summary , th e completenes s goal s ar e state d a t 100% , sinc e thre e vali d run s ar e necessar yt o asses s operatio n at an yon e condition . 5.5. 2 Representativenes s an d Comparabilit y I t i s recognize d that th e usefulnes s ofth e dat a i s als o contingen t upo n meetin g th e criteri a fo r representativenes s an d comparability . Whereve rpossible , referenc e method s an d standar d samplin g procedure s wil l b e used . Th e Q Aobjectiv e i s tha t al l measurement s b e representativ e ofth e matri xan d operatio n bein g evaluated . Th e detaile d requirement s fo rsamplin g give n i n th e variou s EP AReferenc e Method s wil l b e followe d to ensur e representativ e samplin g o fflu e gases . Th e samplin g o fincinerato rfee d stream s prio rt

o th e performanc e tes t wil l provid e representativ e sample s o fthes e matrices . Th e correspondin g Q Aobjectiv e i s tha t al l dat a resultin g fro m samplin g an d analysi s b e comparabl e wit h othe r representativ e measurement s mad e b yth e performanc e tes t fiel d team , o n thi s o ra simila rproces s operatin g unde rsimila rconditions . Th e us e o fpublishe d samplin g an d analytica l method s an d standar d reportin g unit s wil l ai d i n ensurin g th e comparabilit yo fth e data .
Q:\mii971Ptojecls\1000202aVeot a Performance Tes t Pla n U 4 R3JJ52 1 D8.doc Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Pag e 4 of37



## V E S 00267 4. Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit4 HW C Performance Tes tPla n Pag e 5 of3 7 

## 5.5. 3 Metho

d Detection Limi

t(MDL ) Determinations Metho d Detectio n Limit s (MDLs ) fo rth e variou s analyte s t o b e measure d i n thi s progra m wil l b e determine d followin g well-establishe d laborator yprocedure s i n accordanc e wit h standar d EP Aprotocols . Thes e ar e describe d belo wfo rthos e parameter s deeme d mos t crucia l t o th e program . 5.5.3. 1 Metals-Method s 602 0 and7470 A Reportin g limits fo ral l metal s ar e detennine d base d o n th e result s ofth e lates tMD L studie s performe d fo r eac h metal . Fo rthi s program , th e MD L fo rnon-detec t value s wil l b e detennine d b ylow-leve l replicat e spikin g o faliquot s o fth e tria l bu m sample s submitted . Th e reportin g limi t fo rnon-detectabl e metal s i s a chose n whol e numbe rabov e th e MDL , usuall yi n th e rang e o f1.5- 2 time s th e MD L value . 

## 5. 6 Samplin g an d Monitorin g Procedure s Thi s sectio n describe s th e procedure s that wil l b e followe d durin g th e fiel d samplin g program . Throughou tth e overal l program , al l samplin g wil l b e performe d usin g samplin g protocol s describe d herei n an d approve d b y EPA ; Regulator yagenc yapprova l wil l b e obtaine d fo ran ydeviation s fro m o rchange s t o th e approve d Performanc e Tes tPla n whic h ma yb e warrante d prio rt o progra m implementatio n a s a resul t o fchange s i n personne l o rfacilitycircumstances . I fsituation s occu rdurin g th e demonstratio n testin g whic h necessitat e deviation s fro m th e plan , th e agenc ywil l b e notifie d an d onsit e approva l requested . An ydeviation s fro m th e specifie d protocol s wil l b e full ydocumente d i n th e fina l Performanc e Tes t Report . 

## 5.6.1 Fiel d Program Descriptio n Adetaile d descriptio n o fth e complianc e strateg yan d tes t condition s wa s provide d previousl yi n Sectio n 4.0 . I n general , however , th e progra m i s presentl yconfigure d to collec t sample s durin g thre e run s fo ra singl e proces s operatin g condition . Tabl e 5- 3 provide s a detaile d listin g o fth e samplin g an d analytica l parameter s an d method s planne d fo rthi s program . Al l samplin g wil l b e conducte d concurrentl yatth e outle t stac k location . 

## 5.6. 2 Pre-samplin g 

## Activitie s Pre-samplin g activitie s includ e equipmen tcalibration , sampl e medi a preparation , cleanin g o fsampl e trai n glassware , preparatio n o fcomputer-generate d sampl e labels , an d othe rmiscellaneou s tasks . Eac h o fthes e activitie s ar e describe d o rreference d i n th e followin g subsections . Othe rpre-samplin g activitie s includ e suc h detail s a s tea m meetings , equipmen tpackin g an d shipment , equipmen tsetup , an d finalizatio n o fal l detail s leadin g u p t o th e coordinate d initiatio n o fth e samplin g program . 5.6.2. 1 Equipmen tCalibratio n Amos timportan taspec to fpre-samplin g preparation s i s th e inspectio n an d calibratio n o fal l equipmen t planne d to b e use d fo rth e fiel d effort . Equipmen ti s inspecte d fo rprope roperatio n an d durabilityprio rto calibration . Calibratio n o fequipmen ti s conducte d i n accordanc e wit h th e procedure s outline d i n th e EP A documen tentitle d "Qualit yAssuranc e Handboo k fo rAi rPollutio n Measuremen t Systems ; Volum e III — StationarySourc e Specifi c Methods " (EPA-600/4-77-027b) . Equipmen t calibratio n i s performe d i n accordanc e wit h EP Aguideline s and/o rmanufacturer' s recommendations . Documentatio n o fal l calibratio n record s wil l b e kept i n th e projectfil e durin g th e fiel d progra m an d wil l b e availabl e fo rinspectio n b ytes t observers . Example s o ffiel d equipmen t use d an d typica l calibratio n requirement s follows :

Q:\rrw97\ProieclsH0C)02022\Veoli a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00267 5) VeoDa E S Technica l MAC TUni t4 HW C Performance Tes t Pla n

. •Prob e nozzle s (O AHandboo k Sectio n 3.4.2 , pg . 19 ) - mak e thre e measurement s ofth e nozzl e I D (t o th e neares t0.00 1 in. ) usin g differen t diameter s wit h a micrometer . Differenc e betwee n th e hig h an d lowvalue s shoul d no texcee d 0.00 4 in . Post-tes tchec k - inspec tfp rdamage .
•Pito t tube s (Q AHandboo k Sectio n 3.1.2 , pp . 1.-13 ) - measure d fo rappropriat e spacin g an d dimension s o rcalibrat e i n a win d tunnel . Rejectio n criteri a give n o n th e calibratio n sheet . Post-tes t chec k - inspec t fo rdamage .
•Thermocouple s (Q AHandboo k Sectio n 3.4.2 , pp . 15-18 ) - verifyagains t a mercury-in-glas s thermomete ra ttw o o rmor e point s includin g th e anticipate d measuremen t range . Acceptanc e limit s - impinge r*2T ; DG M ±5.4°F ; stac k ±1. 5 percen t o fstac k temperature .
•Dr yga s meter s (Q AHandboo k Sectio n 3.4.2 , pp . 1 -12 ) - calibrat e agains t a we ttes t meter . Acceptanc e criteri a - pretes t Y i = Y±0.02 ; pos ttes t Y= ±0.0 5 Yi .
•Fiel d baromete r(Q AHandboo k Sectio n 3.4.2 , pp . 18-19 ) - compar e agains t a mercury-in-glas s baromete ro rus e AirportStatio n B P an d correc tfo relevation . Acceptanc e criteri a - ±0.0 2 in . Hg ; post-tes tchec k

- same . 5.6.2. 2 Glasswar e Preparatio n Sampl e trai n glasswar e an d sampl e container s requir e specialize d pre-cleanin g t o avoi d contaminatio n ofth e sampl e fro m th e collectio n containe ro rdevices . Cleaning/storag e procedure s fo rsampl e trai n glasswar e ar e summarize d below . Not e tha t al l bottl e cap s ar e fitte d wit h teflo n liner s whic h ar e cleane d i n th e sam e manne r a s th e bottle s themselves . Sampl e container s use d fo rwast e fee d stream s ar e purchase d pre-cleane d an d seale d t o specifie d EP Aprotocols .

•EP AMetho d 2 9 glasswar e an d container s (metals ) - was h wit h soa p an d water , rins e wit h ho t ta p water , rins e thre e time s wit h reagen twater . Th e glasswar e i s next soake d i n a 10 % nitp c aci d solutio n fo ra minimu m o f4-hours , rinse d thre e time s wit h reagen t water , rinsed a fina l tim e wit h aceton e an d ai rdried . Al l glasswar e opening s wher e contaminatio n ca n occu rwil l b e covere d unti l th e samplin g trai n i s assemble d prio rt o sampling . 5.6.2. 3 Sampl e Medi a Preparatio n Al l reagent s wil l b e checke d i n accordanc e wit h ENSR' s existin g Q C Progra m to minimiz e th e probabilit yo f usin g contaminate d solvents . Thi s include s th e us e ofth e prope rgrad e reagents/solvent s a s specifie d i n th e tes t method , selectio n o freagent s fro m th e sam e lo tan d th e collectio n an d analysi s o fth e appropriat e blanks . Samplin g medi a wil l b e procure d an d prepare d i n accordanc e wit h th e appropriat e tes t method s a s describe d below :

•Quart zfilter s use d i n th e Metho d 2 9 samplin g trai n are purchase d fro m Pallfle xProduct s Co . wh o pre-scree n filters fo rmetal s content . 5.6.2. 4 Othe rPre-Samplin g Activitie s Sampl e tea m meeting s wil l b e hel d to designat e responsibilitie s t o eac h tea m member . Assignment s wil l b e base d o n individua l experienc e an d relative importanc e o fth e assigne d task . Othe rpre-samplin g activitie s i n th e offic e wil l includ e generatio n o fsampl e checklists , printin g o fcomputer-generate d sampl e labels , an d prope rpackin g o fal l equipment . Equipmen twil l the n b e transporte d b yfreigh t o rtruc k to th e samplin g location .

Q:\mw97IPnier*\10002022VVeoli a Performance Tes l Pla n I M R 3 052108.do c Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Pag e 6 o f3 7 ,



## V E S 00267 6" - , . Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Teohnlca l MAC TUni t4 HW C Performance Tes t Pla n Pag e 7 o f3 7
Sit e setu p i s th e fina l pre-samplin g adrvity . Thi s tas k wil l involv e movin g th e equipmen t t o th e vicinityofth e sampl e collectio n area . Aseparat e offic e traile ro rothe rsuitabl e onsit e facilitywil l b e use d t o serv e a s a sampl e trai n setu p an d recover yare a an d sampl e custod yarea . Normally , preliminarytest s ar e conducte d a tth e stac k locatio n t o verif yth e presenc e o rabsenc e o fcycloni c flo wcondition s an d t o determin e flu e ga s moisture , temperatur e an d velocity . Thes e measurement s facilitat e determinatio n o fnozzl e siz e selectio n an d sampl e trai n operatio n rate s for . th e isokineti c samplin g trains .

. 5.6. 3 Samplin g Location s 5.6.3. 1 Wast e Fee d Stream s Wast e fee d material s wil l b e sample d i n accordanc e wit h th e facility' s fee d strea m analysi s pla n (FSAP ) an d RCR AWast e Analysi s Pla n (WAP) . Wast e fee d samplin g wil l occu rupstrea m o fan ymeta l spikin g location . Sample s wil l b e collecte d usin g methodologie s describe d i n th e FSA P an d WAP . 5.6.3. 2 Stac k

Samplin g Locatio n Sampl e tes t port s i n th e circula r48-inc h insid e diamete r(ID ) stac k ar e locate d 65. 5 fee t (16. 4 diameters ) downstrea m o fth e induced-draf t fa n an d 2 6 fee t (6.5 0 diameters ) upstrea m o fth e stac k exi t t o atmosphere . I n accordanc e wit h EP AMetho d 1 , a 12-poin t travers e wil l b e performe d durin g testing . On e tes t port leve l wil l b e use d t o accommodat e simultaneou s testin g o fal l emission s tes t parameters . Figur e 5- 1 provide s a schemati c ofth e stac k showin g th e locatio n ofth e samplin g ports . Actua l travers e poin t location s an d upstream/downstrea m distance s fro m flo wdisturbance s ar e show n i n Tabl e 5-4 . 5.6. 4 Wast e Fee d Strea m Samplin g Procedure s Eac h wast e fee d materia l fe d durin g fh e tes t wil l b e sample d fro m tap s i n th e fee d line s o rothe rappropriat e locations , upstrea m o fan ymeta l spikin g location . Durin g th e testin g eac h wast e fee d materia l wil l b e sample d a tth e start o

feac h run , a tport change , an d at th e completio n o feac h run . Afte rtestin g i s completed , th e thre e sample s that wer e collecte d wil l b e composite d an d analyse s wil l b e performe d o n thi s composit e sample . Th e fee d stream s wil l b e characterize d fo rash , hea t content , metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an d mercury ) an d tota l chlorine . Veoli a wil l b e responsibl e fo ral l wast e fee d analyses . 5.6. 5 Stac k

Samplin g Methodologie s , Gase s discharge d fro m th e exhaus tstac k wil l b e sample d b yENS R fo rth e followin g parameters :

•Flu e ga s velocity , flo wrate , temperature , moistur e conten tan d fixe d ga s (O 2 an d C0 2 ) composition ;

•MAC TMetal s - arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , lea d an d mercury ; Th e followin g section s provid e summarie s o fth e samplin g methodologie s t o b e followed . I n addition , sampl e fiel d dat a sheet s to b e use d durin g th e progra m ar e provide d i n Appendi xB . Summarie s o frelevan t informatio n pertainin g to setu p an d recover yofth e EP AMetho d 2 9 samplin g trai n ar e provide d i n Appendi xC .

Q:\nwfl7lProjecls\10002022\VeoS a Perfonnanc e Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00267 7Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Performance Tes tPla n

5.6.5. 1 Ga s Strea m Velocity , Moistur e an d Fixe d Gase s Ga s strea m flowrate , moistur e an d fixe d ga s concentratio n wil l b e determine d concurren t wit h th e EP A Metho d 2 9 isokineti c samplin g train . Ga s strea m velocit ywil l b e determine d usin g a pito t tub e an d wate r manomete ri n accordanc e wit h EP AMetho d 2 . Ga s strea m temperatur e wil l als o b e determine d ateac h ofth e Metho d 2 travers e point s usin g a Typ e T C thermocoupl e an d pyrometer . Ga s strea m moistur e wil l b e wil l b e determine d a s specifie d i n EP AMetho d 4 concurren twit h th e EP AMetho d 2 9 isokineti c samplin g train . I n thi s procedur e th e impinge rcontent s ar e measure d o rweighe d befor e an d afte reac h tes t ru n an d use d i n conjunctio n wit h th e metere d ga s volum e t o determin e th e ga s strea m moistur e content . Fixe d gase s (0 2an d C0 2 ) fo rga s strea m molecula rweigh t determinatio n an d constituen toxyge n conectio n wil l b e determine d i n accordanc e wit h EP AMetho d 3 (Orsa t procedure ) durin g eac h tes t run . 5.6.5. 2 Metal s EP AMetho d 2 9 wil l b e utilize d fo rth e collectio n o fMAC Tan d othe rmetal s including :

•MAC TLV M metal s - arsenic , berylliu m an d chromium ;

•MAC TSV M metal s - cadmiu m an d lead ; an d

•Mercury . Specifi c samplin g detail s fo rth e Metho d 2 9 samplin g trai n ar e a s follows :

•Targe tsamplin g rat e - 0.7 5 cf m

•Sampl e ru n tim e - 2-h r

•Numbe rofsamplin g point s pe rstac k travers e - 6

•Tota l numbe ro fsamplin g point s - 1 2

•Numbe ro ffiel d reagen tblan k set s collecte d - 1 5.6.5. 3 Continuou s Emissio n Monitorin g ENS R wil l provid e measuremen to foxyge n (0 2 ) an d carbo n dioxid e (C0 2 ) throughou t al l tes t ru n periods . Thes e parameter s wil l b e measure d usin g th e procedure s specifie d i n 4 0 CF R 60 , Appendi xA , Metho d 3 (Orsa tanalysis) . Veoli a wil l provid e continuou s emissio n monitorin g fo rcarbo n monoxid e (CO ) durin g al l thre e tes t run s i n accordanc e wit h th e facility' s Qualit yAssuranc e Pla n fo rthei rCEMs . 

## 5.7 Sampl e Handling , Traceabilit yan d Holdin g Time s Sampl e integritywil l b e maintaine d throughou t al l phase s o fth e samplin g an d analysi s program . Sample s wil l b e hel d withi n sigh to fth e sampler s o rsampl e custodian , o rwil l b e kep t i n seale d o rsecure d container s a t al l times . Seale d cooler s an d DO Tshippin g boxe s wil l b e use d t o shi p sample s to th e designate d laboratoryvi a Priority1 overnigh t FedE xservice . Preprinte d sampl e identificatio n label s ar e use d b yENS R t o ensur e that al l require d informatio n i s full y documented . Whe n sampl e batche s ar e shippe d t o th e specifie d laboratory , a sampl e packin g list(se e

Q:Virafl7\Projecls\10002022VVecSa Performanc e Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_O52108.do c Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Pag e 8 o f3 7



## V E S 00267 8Revision : Q Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Performanc e Tes t Pla n Pag e 9 of3 7 Figur e 5-2 ) accompanie s th e shipmen t Thi s for m i s base d o n establishe d laboratoryforma t an d wil l b e use d t o documen t sampl e transfe ri n th e fiel d an d fro m samplin g personne l t o th e laboratory . Th e ENS R Fiel d Tea m Leade rwil l coordinat e th e packin g an d shipmen t o fal l samples . Worksheet s specificall ydesigne d fo rthi s progra m wil l b e generate d prio rto th e fiel d effort . Thes e sheet s wil l assis tth e Fiel d Tea m Leade ri n assurin g that al l sample s hav e bee n collected , accounte d fo ran d shippe d unde rsampl e traceabilitydocumentatio n t o th e appropriat e laboratory . Requirement s pertainin g t o sampl e preservatio n an d recommende d holdin g time s ar e note d i n Tabl e 5-5 . Al l material s suc h a s fiel d an d laborator ynotebook s an d logbooks , fiel d an d laborator ydat a records , correspondence , reports , sampl e tags , traceabilityrecord s an d instrumen t printout s wil l b e clearl ylabele d wit h th e project numbe ran d becom e a permanen t part ofth e project file . Projec t sample s wil l b e dispose d o fi n a n appropriat e manne r6 0 day s afte racceptanc e an d approva l o fa fina l report . Al l project-relate d documentatio n a t bot h ENS R an d th e subcontracto rlaboratorie s wil l b e kep t o n fil e fo r2 year s followin g submitta l o fth e fina l report . 

## 5.8 Analytica l Method s an d Calibratio n Procedure s Thi s sectio n delineate s th e analytica l protocol s that wil l b e use d t o analyz e sample s durin g thi s performanc e tes t Sample s o fwast e fee d material s an d stac k ga s wil l b e collecte d an d analyze d forth e parameter s previousl ydiscusse d usin g th e appropriat e laborator yprotocol s detaile d i n thi s sectio n an d a s outline d previousl yi n Tabl e 5-3 . 

## 5.8.1 Analysi s o

fWast e Fee d Streams 5.8.1. 1 Chemica l an d Physica l Propertie s o fWast e Fee d Stream s Analyse s to determin e th e chemica l an d physica l propertie s o fth e wast e fee d material s wil l b e performe d usin g appropriat e AST M o rEP ASW-84 6 analytica l method s a s outline d i n th e Veoli a FSA P an d WAP . Fo r an yanalytica l result s that ar e "non-detect" , Veoli a wil l utilize 1 4 o fth e detectio n limi t fo rthat paramete ri n an y calculatio n o ffee d rates . 5.8. 2 Analysi s o fStac k Ga s Sample s 5.8.2. 1 Metal s i n Stac k Ga s Sample s Analysi s - Eac h samplin g trai n wil l b e prepare d an d analyze d i n accordanc e wit h EP AReferenc e Metho d 29 . Fro m eac h samplin g train , seve n individua l sample s ar e generate d fo ranalysis . Th e first two samples , labele d Fraction s 1 Aan d 1 B consist s ofth e digeste d sampl e fro m th e fron t hal fo fth e train , consistin g ofth e particulat e filte ran d th e front-hal fnitri c aci d prob e rinse. Fractio n 1 Ai s fo rIC P analysi s an d Fractio n 1 B i s fo r mercur yanalysis . Fraction s 2 Aan d 2 B consis to fdigestate s fro m th e moistur e knoc k ou t an d HNO3/H2O 2 impinger s 1,2 , an d 3 . Fractio n 2 Ai s fo rIC P analysi s an d Fractio n 2 B i s fo rmercur yanalysis . Fraction s 3A , 3 B an d 3 C consis to fth e impinge rcontent s an d rinses fro m th e empt yan d permanganat e impinger s 4 , 5 , an d 6 . Thes e fraction s wil l b e analyze d fo rmercury . Analyse s fo rmetal s othe rtha n mercur ywil l b e performe d usin g Inductivel yCouple d Plasm a Mas s Spectroscop y(ICP-MS ) a s describe d i n EP AMetho d 602 0 (SW-846 , 3r d Edition) . Mercur yanalysi s wil l b e performe d usin g EP AMethod s 7470 Ao r7471 A(SW-846,3r d Edition) . Al l qualit ycontro l procedures , includin g th e interferenc e chec k standard , wil l b e followe d a s describe d i n th e respectiv e method . a\mw97\Projects\10002022lVeoli a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00267 9Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t 4 HW C Performance Tes t Pla n Pag e 1 0 o f37
Calibratio n - Calibratio n o fth e ICA P wil l b e performe d dail yi n accordanc e wit h th e procedure s describe d i n Melho d 602 0 an d th e manufacturer' s instructions . Th e calibratio n i s verifie d dail yb yanalysi s o fa n instrumen t chec k standar d prepare d fro m a n EP Aqualit ycontro l concentrat e o rothe rindependen t standard . QA/Q C requirement s fo rth e analysi s o fmetal s i n stac k ga s sample s ar e summarize d i n Tabl e 5-6 . 

## 5. 9 Interna l Q AProgra m Qualit ycontro l check s wil l b e performe d t o ensur e th e collectio n o frepresentativ e sample s an d th e generatio n o fvali d analytica l result s fo rthes e samples . Thes e check s wil l b e performe d b yprojec t participant s throughou t th e progra m unde rth e directio n o fth e Projec t Manage ran d th e Q AOfficer . 

## 5.9. 1 Dat

a Collectio n and Samplin g Q C Procedure s ' Q C check s fo rth e proces s dat a collectio n an d samplin g aspect s o fthi s progra m wil l include , bu t not b e limite d to , th e following : 1 . Us e o fstandardize d dat a sheets , checklist s an d fiel d notebook s t o ensur e completeness , traceability , an d comparabilit yofth e proces s informatio n an d sample s collected . 2 . Fiel d checkin g o fstandardize d form s b yth e Fiel d Tea m Leade ran d a secon d perso n t o ensur e accurac y an d completeness . 3 . Stric t adherenc e t o th e sampl e traceabilit yprocedures . 4 . Submissio n o ffiel d biase d blanks . 5 . Lea k

check s o fsampl e train s befor e an d afte rsampl e collectio n an d durin g th e test , whe n appropriate . 5.9.1. 1 Samplin g Equipmen t Q C Check s an d Frequenc y Calibratio n o fth e fiel d samplin g equipmen t wil l b e performe d prio rt o an d at th e conclusio n o fth e field samplin g effort . Copie s ofth e calibratio n sheet s wil l b e availabl e onsit e durin g th e fiel d samplin g progra m fo r inspection , wil l b e kep t i n th e projec t fil e an d wii l b e submitte d i n th e fina l report . Calibration s wil l b e performe d a s describe d i n th e EP Apublicatio n "Qualit yAssuranc e Handboo k fo rAi rPollutio n Measuremen t Systems , Volum e III , Stationar ySourc e Specifi c Methods; " Sectio n 4.2. 1 present s acceptanc e limits . Lea k check s o fth e sampl e train s wil l b e conducte d i n accordanc e wit h th e protoco l calle d ou t fo reac h method . Lea k check s wil l b e conducte d prio rto an d at th e en d o fsampl e collectio n an d durin g th e tes t run , whe n appropriate . 5.9.1. 2 Sampl e Collectio n Q C Check s Field-biase d blank s o freagent s an d collectio n medi a (deionize d water , filters , impinge rsolutions , etc. ) wil l b e place d i n appropriatel ycleane d an d size d sampl e container s i n th e fiel d an d handle d i n th e sarn e wa ya s actua l fiel d samples , t o provid e a Q C chec k o n sampl e handling . Fo rthi s program , sampl e collectio n Q C check s an d frequenc yfo rsample s t o b e analyze d i n th e laborator yar e liste d below :

•On e fiel d reagen t blan k Metho d 2 9 samplin g train . a\rnw97\Prcjeds\10fM2022\VeoS a Performance Tes t Pla n I M R3_052108.do cVeoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Performance Tes t Pla n Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Pag e 1 1 o f3 7 

## 5.9. 2 Analytica l Q C Procedure s fo rSample

s t o b e Analyzed i n the Laborator y Th e Qualit yContro l progra m fo rlaborator yanalysi s make s us e o fa numbe ro fdifferen t type s o fQ C sample s t o documen t th e validityofth e generate d data . Th e followin g type s o fQ C sample s wil l b e use d durin g th e program . 5.9.2. 1 Qualit yContro l Sample s an d Blank s Metho d Blank s Metho d blank s contai n al l th e reagent s use d i n th e preparatio n an d analysi s o fsample s an d ar e processe d throug h th e entir e analytica l schem e t o asses s spuriou s contaminatio n arisin g fro m reagents , glassware , an d ofhe rmaterial s use d i n th e analysis . Calibratio n Chec k

Sample s On e ofth e workin g calibratio n standard s whic h i s periodicall yuse d t o chec k tha t th e origina l calibratio n i s stil l valid . Laborator yContro l Sample s (LCS ) o rBlan k Spike s Thes e sample s ar e generate d fro m spike s prepare d independentl yfro m th e calibratio n concentrates . Th e LC S ar e use d t o establis h tha t a n instrumen t o rprocedur e i s i n control . A n LC S i s nonmall ycarrie d throug h th e entire sampl e preparatio n an d analysi s procedur e also . Reagent s use d i n th e laborator yar e normall yo fanalytica l reagen t grad e o rhighe rpurity ; eac h lot o faci d o r solven t use d i s checke d fo racceptabilit yprio rt o laboratoryuse . Al l reagent s ar e labele d wit h tii e dat e ' receive d an d dat e opened . Th e qualityofth e laboratorydeionize d wate ri s routinel ychecked . A H glasswar e use d i n th e samplin g an d analysi s procedure s wil l b e pre-cleane d accordin g t o th e metho d requirements . Standar d laboratorypractice s fo rlaboratot ycleanliness , personne l trainin g an d othe rgenera l procedure s ar e used . Th e result s o fthes e qualit ycontro l procedure s wil l b e include d i n th e fina l report . 

## 5.1 0 Dat

a Reduction , Verificatio n an d Dat a Reportin g Specifi c Q C measure s wil l b e use d t o ensur e th e generatio n o freliabl e dat a fro m samplin g an d analysi s activities . Prope rcollectio n an d organizatio n o faccurat e informatio n followe d b yclea ran d concis e reportin g o f th e dat a i s a primarygoa l i n al l suc h projects . 

## 5.10.1 Fiel d Dat

a Reductio n Appendi xB o fthi s Performanc e Tes t Pla n present s th e standardize d form s that wil l b e use d to recor d field samplin g data . Th e Fiel d Tea m Leade ran d at leas t on e othe rfield cre wmembe rwil l revie wth e dat a collecte d fro m eac h trai n i n its entiret yi n th e field . Error s o rdiscrepancie s wil l b e note d an d deal t wit h accordingly . Th e Fiel d Tea m Leade rha s th e authorityto institute correctio n actions i n th e field . Th e Q Aoffice rwil l als o b e notifie d fo rresolutio n i fth e situatio n warrants . At a minimum , th e Q Aoffice ri s apprise d o fal l deviation s fro m standar d protocol . Fiel d dat a reductio n (checkin g o fvali d isokineti c samplin g rat e an d othe rsamplin g parameters ) i s don e wit h a lapto p compute rusin g standardize d Exce l spreadsheets . Appendi xC provide s sampl e trai n setu p an d recover yschematic s an d a descriptio n o fsolution s an d reagent s t o b e use d i n eac h isokineti c trai n require d fo rth e overal l program . Al l sampl e recover ysheet s wil l b e checke d fo rcompleteness .

a\m«97\PrDjeclsl1000202aVeo« a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00268 1Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t4 HW C Performance Tes t Pla n Pag e 1 2 o f3 7 

## 5.10. 2 Laborator

yAnalysi s Dat

a Reductio n Analytica l result s wil l b e reduce d to appropriat e unit s b yth e laborator yusin g th e equation s give n i n th e applicabl e analytica l method . Unles s otherwis e specified , result s fro m th e analysi s o fwast e fee d an d proces s sample s fo rspecifi c targe t constituent s wil l b e reporte d i n unit s o fmg/k g o r% w tOthe rparameter s wil l b e reporte d i n standar d unit s suc h a s g/cc , Btu/lb , etc . Th e laborator ytypicall yreport s result s fro m th e analysi s o fstac k flu e ga s sample s a s tota l mas s detecte d fo r th e sampl e submitted . Fo rthos e sampl e fraction s wher e liqui d impinge rcondensat e i s analyzed , th e laborator ywil l measur e th e tota l liqui d volum e submitte d an d multipl yb yth e measure d concentration s o ftarge t analyte s i n thes e samples . Th e laboratorie s wil l generall yreport dat a a s follows :
« Al l metal s excep tmercur y- tota l p g o feac h meta l i n th e combine d front-hal fan d back-hal fsampl e trai n fraction s

•Mercury-tota l p g i n eac h sampl e trai n fractio n Eac h LS C wil l b e responsibl e fo rreviewin g al l result s an d calculation s an d verifyin g th e completjenes s o ffh e dat a se tTh e laboratoryreport s submitte d b yeac h laborator ywil l includ e th e followin g deliverables :

•Transmitta l lette rlistin g al l sample s an d analyse s an d a cas e narrativ e identifyin g an ydifficultie s associate d wit h th e analyse s an d an yanomalou s QA/Q C result s

•Copie s o fChai n o fCustod yForm s

•Sampl e Repor tform s wit h sampl e fiel d an d laborator yidentifier , date s o fsampl e preparatio n an d analysis , analytica l result s an d detectio n limit s

•Metho d Blan k

result s

•Matri xspik e an d matri xspike duplicat e result s (a s applicable )

•Replicat e sampl e analyse s (a s applicable )

•Laborator yContro l Sampl e result s 

## 5.10. 3 Dat a Verificatio n Dat a verificatio n i s fh e proces s o freviewin g dat a an d accepting , qualifyin g o rrejectin g i to n th e basi s o f method-specifi c criteria . Th e independen tproject QA O wil l us e validatio n method s an d criteri a appropriat e t o th e typ e o fdat a an d th e purpos e ofth e measurement . Record s o fal l dat a wil l b e maintained , eve n that judge d to b e a n "outlying " o rspuriou s value . Fiel d samplin g dat a wil l b e validate d b yth e Fiel d Tea m Leade rbase d o n a judgmen t ofth e representativenes s o fth e sample , maintenanc e an d cleanlines s o fsamplin g equipmen tan d th e adherenc e t o a n approved , writte n sampl e collectio n procedure . Analytica l dat a wil l b e validate d byth e subcontracto rlaboratoryQ C o rsupervisor ypersonne l usin g criteri a outline d i n thei rlaboratory-specifi c Q APla n and/o rwritte n SOPs . Result s fro m field an d laboratorymetho d blanks , replicat e sample s an d interna l Q C sample s wil l b e use d t o furthe rvalidat e analytica l results . Analytica l result s o n fiel d blank s an d replicat e fiel d sample s ar e valuabl e fo rvalidatio n o fsampl e collectiort also . Q C personne l wil l revie wal l subcontracto rlaboratoryra wanalytica l dat a t o verif ycalculate d result s Presented .

a\mw97\Projects\10002022\VeoS a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00268 2Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t 4 HW C Performance Tes tPla n Pag e 1 3 o f3 7

Th e followin g criteri a wil l b e use d t o evaluat e th e fiel d samplin g data :

•Us e o fapprove d tes t procedure s

•Prope roperatio n o fth e proces s bein g teste d

•Us e o fpropertyoperatin g an d calibrate d equipmen t

•. Lea k

check s conducte d befor e an d afte rtest s

•Us e o freagent s that hav e conforme d t o Q C specifie d criteri a

•Us e o fNB S traceabl e CE M calibratio n gase s (a s applicable )

•Prope rchain-of-custod ymaintaine d

•Al l sampl e train s -chec k t o ensur e prope rsampl e ga s volum e collecte d Th e criteri a liste d belo wwil l b e use d t o evaluat e th e analytica l data :

•Us e o fapprove d analytica l procedure s •Us e o fpropertyoperatin g an d calibrate d instrumentatio n

•Precisio n an d accurac yachieve d shoul d b e comparabl e t o that achieve d i n previou s analytica l program s an d consisten twit h objective s state d i n thi s document . 

## 5.10.4 Fina l 

## Dat

a Reportin g i Stac k ga s concentration s fo reac h applicabl e paramete rwil l b e calculate d fro m laborator yresults an d fiel d samplin g data . Th e tota l weigh t o fth e analyt e detecte d wil l b e divide d b yth e volum e o fga s sample d t o provid e emissio n concentrations . Fo rMAC Tcompliance , al l emissio n concentration s ar e furthe rcorrecte d t o 7 % oxyge n fo rcompariso n t o th e publishe d standards . Acomplet e Fina l Repor toutlinin g th e goals , method s an d result s fo rth e progra m wil l b e prepare d an d an y deviation s fro m thi s tes t pla n wil l b e documented . Th e Fina l Repor twil l includ e a sectio n o n evaluatio n an d discussio n o fQA/Q C results. Result s wil l b e compare d to expecte d limits fo raccuracy , precisio n and/o r completenes s a s targete d i n thi s protocol . Th e fina l tes t reportwil l als o includ e th e result s o fan yinterna l audit s conducte d o n th e progra m a s wel l as :

•Al l fiel d dat a sheet s showin g samplin g method , dates , ru n times , personnel , equipment ; sampl e preservation , identificatio n an d compositin g records .
•Fiel d equipmen t calibratio n data .

•Analytica l la b report s an d relevan tsupportin g documentation . 

## 5.1 1 Routin e Maintenance Procedure s an d Schedule s Thi s sectio n provide s pertinen tinformatio n fo rfiel d samplin g equipmen t a s wel l a s a listin g o fal l critica l facility equipmen tnecessar yto maintai n permitte d operatin g condition s an d t o demonstrat e continuin g permi t compliance . Informatio n i s provide d fo rpreventiv e maintenanc e an d schedule s an d spar e part s fo rke y equipmen tan d instrumentation .

Q:lmw97»>rojeclsV10002022\VeoS a Performanc e Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.drj c



## V E S 00268 3Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Performance Tes tPla n Pag e 1 4 o f3 7 

## 5.11. 1 Fiel d Samplin g Equipmen t Th e fiel d tea m follow s a n orderl yprogra m o fpositiv e action s to preven tth e failur e o fequipmen to rinstrument s durin g use . Thi s preventiv e maintenanc e an d carefu l calibratio n help s t o ensur e accurat e measurement s an d minima l fiel d delays . Al l equipmen tthat i s schedule d fo rfiel d us e i s calibrate d a s outline d previousl yi n Sectio n 5.6.2.1 . Prio rt o eac h fiel d us e fo ra specifi c project , th e equipmen t i s cleane d an d checke d t o ensur e i t i s i n goo d workin g order . A n adequat e suppl yo fspar e part s an d sampl e trai n glasswar e i s brough tt o eac h sit e t o minimiz e downtim e an d fiel d samplin g delays . An yequipmen t tha t doe s experienc e problem s i s appropriatel ytagge d i n th e fiel d to ensur e that i t i s repaire d upo n retur n t o th e office . 

## 5.11. 2 Facilit yEquipmen

t an d Instrumentation A s state d i n Section s V.a.F . an d V.b.F . o fVeolia' s Par tB RCR APermit , eac h incinerato rsyste m undergoe s a "thoroug h visua l inspectio n fo rleaks , spills , fugitive emissions , an d sig n o ftamperin g a t leas t dail yan d i n accordanc e wit h th e inspectio n schedul e containe d i n Appendi x6 ofth e approve d permi tapplication" . Veoli a utilize s thes e inspection s an d additiona l preventiv e maintenanc e activitie s a s proactiv e measure s fo r minimizin g th e potentia l fo rmalfunctions . T o facilitat e prope rmaintenance , a col d shutdow n wil l occu ra t leas t onc e pe ryea rfo reac h incinerato rsystem . Routin e inspectio n an d maintenanc e activitie s ar e scheduled , communicated , an d recorde d throug h th e us e o f fiel d checklists . Part s o fth e incinerato rsystem s tha t ar e subjec tto wea r(e.g. , bearings , O-rings ; air/oi l filters ) ar e replace d base d o n th e schedule s indicate d o n thes e checklists . Thes e fiel d checklist s wil l als o b e use d t o documen trepair s o rreplacement s o fincinerato rcomponent s that ma yb e reveale d durin g inspections . Brie f procedures/instruction s fo rinspectio n an d maintenanc e activitie s ar e provide d o n fiel d checklists . Continuou s monitorin g syste m component s ar e comprise d o fman yinstrument s includin g scales , flowmeters , thermocouples , pressur e transmitters , differentia l pressur e cells , ba g lea k detectors , an d limi t switches . Al l component s critica l fo rmonitorin g permitte d parameter s ar e audite d eithe ro n a quarterl yo rannua l basi s to ensur e prope roperation . Dail ycalibratio n check s ar e performe d o n th e Unit" s CEM's . 

## 5.1 2 QA/Q C Assessmen tProcedure s Th e Q Aactivitie s implemente d i n thi s progra m wil l provid e a basi s fo rassessin g th e accurac yan d precisio n o f th e analytica l measurements . Sectio n 5. 8 o fthi s QAP P discusse s th e Q Aactivitythat wil l generat e th e accurac yan d precisio n dat a fo reac h sampl e type . Ageneralize d for m ofth e equation s tha t wil l b e use d t o calculat e accuracy , precisio n an d completenes s follows . 5.12. 1 Accurac y Percen taccurac ywil l b e determine d usin g th e followin g equation : % Recover y= —

~S ) x 10 0 where : X= experimentall ydetermine d concentratio n o fth e spike d sampl e

T= tru e concentratio n ofth e spike S = sampl e concentratio n befor e spikin g
a\rro«mProjecls\10002022\Veoli a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00268 4VeoB a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Performance Tes t Pla n Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Pag e 1 5 of37 

## 5.12. 2 Precisio n Precisio n (calculate d a s percen t relativ e difference ) wil l b e determine d usin g th e followin g equation :

R c lative Percent

Difference 'RPD ) = where : Di an d D 2= result s o fduplicat e measurement s o rstandar d deviatio n relativ e t o th e averag e valu e

expresse d a s relativ e standar d deviation : Relativ e standar d deviatio n wil l b e expresse d a s follows : Relativ e Standar d Deviatio n ( % RSD ) = x (xi • X.) x

100 where :
a (n-i ) = standar d deviatio n o fth e sampl e dat a n = numbe ro freplicate s x<xi..xn) =arithmeti c mea n o fth e sampl e dat a 

## 5.12. 3 Completenes

s Dat a completenes s i s a measur e o fth e exten t t o whic h th e databas e resultin g fro m a measuremen t effort fulfill s objective s fo rth e amoun t o fdat a required . Fo rthi s program , completenes s wil l b e define d a s th e percentag e o fvali d dat a fo rth e tota l vali d tests . Completenes s i s assesse d usin g th e followin g equation : Completeness (%) = Dr Dc x 10 0 where : D r= numbe ro fsample s fo rwhic h vali d result s ar e reporte d D c= numbe ro fvali d sample s that ar e collecte d an d reac h th e laborator yfo ranalysi s Th e completenes s objective wil l hel p to evaluat e th e accurac yan d precisio n o fth e analytica l measurements . 

## 5.1 3 Externa l Q AProgra m Th e Externa l Qualit yAssuranc e Progra m include s bot h performanc e an d syste m audit s a s independen t check s o n th e qualityo fdat a obtaine d fro m sampling , analysis , an d dat a gatherin g activities . Ever yeffort i s mad e t o hav e th e audi t asses s th e measuremen t proces s i n norma l operation . Eithe rtyp e o faudi t ma ysho w th e nee d fo rcorrectiv e action .

Q:\mw97\Projccts\10002022\VeoS a Performance Tes tPla n I M R3_052108.OO C



## V E S 00268 5Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoti a E S Technica l MAC TUni t 4 HW C Performanc e Tes t Pla n Pag e 1 6 o f3 7 

## 5.13. 1 Performanc

e Audit s Th e sampling , analysis , an d dat a handlin g segment s o fa project are.checke d i n performanc e audits . A differen t operator/analys t prepare s an d conduct s thes e audi t operation s t o ensur e th e independenc e o fth e quantitative results . EP AQualit yContro l concentrate s o rothe rstandard s wil l b e use d t o asses s th e analytica l work . Result s wil l b e reviewe d b yth e subcontracto rlaborator yan d Q C personnel . An yadditiona l audi t sample s presente d b y th e regulator yagencie s wil l b e analyze d alon g wit h progra m samples , b yth e appropriat e la b an d at th e sam e time a s al l othe rsamples . I t will , however , b e th e responsibilit yo fth e regulator yagenc yt o obtai n thes e samples , an d presen t the m t o th e facilityproject manage ri n a for m tha t i s amenabl e an d appropriat e t o th e analytica l method s bein g utilized . I fth e regulatoryagenc yadvise s facilityprogra m manage rtha t audi t result s fal l outsid e o facceptabl e ranges , th e analytica l dat a wil l b e furthe rreviewe d fo rerro ri n conjunctio n wit h th e agency , l fa simple , correctabl e erro ri s foun d (e.g. , a n arithmeti c error) , correctio n wil l b e mad e an d result s resubmitted . I fn o erro ri s found , a n investigatio n int o othe rcause s o fth e failur e (e.g. , lac k o fsampl e integrity) wil l b e conducte d an d result s evaluate d i n term s ofth e impac t o n sampl e dat a integrity . 

## 5.13.2 Correctiv

e Actio n Th e acceptanc e limits fo rth e samplin g an d analyse s t o b e conducte d i n thi s progra m wil l b e thos e state d i n th e metho d o rdefine d b yth e projec t manager . Th e correctiv e actions ar e likel yt o b e immediat e i n natur e an d mos t ofte n wil l b e implemente d b yth e analys t o rProjec t Manager ; th e correctiv e actio n wil l usuall yinvolv e recalculation , reanalysis , o rrepeatin g a sampl e run . Ongoin g conectiv e actio n polic yi s describe d here . 5.13.2. 1 Immediat e Correctiv e Actio n Specifi c Q C procedure s an d checklist s ar e designe d t o hel p analyst s detec t th e nee d fo rcorrectiv e action . Ofte n th e person' s experienc e wil l b e mor e valuabl e i n alertin g th e operato rto suspiciou s dat a o r malfunctionin g equipment . I fa correctiv e actio n ca n b e take n at thi s point , a s part o fnorma l operatin g procedures , th e collectio n o fpoo r qualitydat a ca n b e avoided . Instrumen t an d equipmen t malfunction s ar e amenabl e t o thi s typ e o factio n an d Q C procedure s includ e troubleshootin g guide s an d correctiv e actio n suggestions . Th e action s take n shoul d b e note d i n fiel d o rlaboratorynotebook s bu t n o othe rforma l documentatio n i s required , unles s furthe r correctiv e actio n i s necessary . Thes e on-the-spo t correctiv e actions ar e a n everyda ypart o fth e QA/Q C sysfem . Correctiv e actio n durin g th e fiel d samplin g portio n o fa progra m i s mos t ofte n a resul t o fequipmen t failur e o r a n operato roversigh t an d ma yrequir e repeatin g a run . Whe n equipmen t i s discovere d t o b e defectiv e (i.e. , pre - an d post-samplin g lea k check ) it i s repaire d o rreplace d an d a correctio n facto ri s establishe d a s pe rth e EP Amethod . I

fa correctio n facto ri s unacceptabl e th e ru n i s repeated . Operato roversigh t i s bes t avoide d b y havin g fiel d cre wmember s audi t eac h other' s wor k befor e an d afte ra test . Ever yeffort i s mad e b yth e fiel d tea m leade rto ensur e that al l Q C procedure s ar e followed . Economically , it i s preferre d t o repea t a ru n durin g a particula rfiel d tri p rathe rtha n retur n a t a late rdate . Correctiv e actio n fo ranalytica l wor k woul d includ e re-calibratio n o finstruments , reanalysi s o fknow n Q C sample s and , i fnecessary , o factua l fiel d samples .

Q:\mw97\Projects\10002022\Veofa Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00268 6Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Performance Tes t Pla n Page17of3 7

I fth e proble m i s not solve d i n thi s way , mor e formalize d long-ter m correctiv e actio n ma yb e necessary . 5.13.2. 2 Long-Ter m Correctiv e Actio n Th e nee d fo rthi s actio n ma yb e identifie d b ystandar d Q C procedures , contro l charts , performanc e o rsyste m audits . An yqualityproble m whic h canno t b e solve d b yimmediat e correctiv e actio n fall s int o th e long-ter m category . Th e condition i s reporte d t o a perso n responsibl e fo rcorrectin g i t wh o i s part o fIh e closed-loo p actio n an d follow-u p plan : Th e essentia l step s i n th e closed-loo p correctiv e actio n syste m are :

•Identif

yan d defin e th e problem . •Assig n responsibilit yfo rinvestigatin g th e problem .
•Investigat e an d detennin e th e caus e o fth e problem .
•Detennin e a correctiv e actio n t o eliminat e th e problem .
•Assig n an d accep t responsibilit yfo rimplementin g th e correctiv e action . •Establis h effectivenes s o fth e conectiv e actio n an d implemen t i t

•Verif ythat th e conectiv e actio n ha s eliminate d th e problem . Documentatio n ofth e proble m i s importan t t o th e system . ACorrectiv e Actio n Reques t For m i s fille d ou t b y th e perso n findin g th e qualityproblem . Thi s for m identifie s th e problem , possibl e cause s an d th e perso n responsibl e fo ractio n o n th e problem . Th e responsibl e perso n ma yb e a n analyst , fiel d tea m leader , departmen t Q C coordinato ro rth e Q ADirector . I fn o perso n i s identifie d a s responsibl e fo raction , th e Q A Directo rinvestigate s th e situatio n an d determine s wh o i s responsibl e i n eac h case . Th e Correctiv e Actio n Reques t For m include s a descriptio n o fth e correctiv e actio n planne d an d th e dat e i t wa s taken , an d spac e fo rfollow-up . Th e Q ADirecto rcheck s t o b e sur e that initia l actio n ha s bee n take n an d appear s effectiv e and , at a n appropriat e late rdate , check s agai n t o se e i fth e proble m ha s bee n full ysolved . Th e Q ADirecto rreceive s a cop yo fal l Correctiv e Actio n Form s an d the n enter s the m i n th e Correctiv e Actio n Log . Thi s permanen t recor d aid s th e Q ADirecto ri n follow-u p an d make s an yqualit yproblem s visibl e t o management ; th e fo g ma yals o prov e valuabl e i n listin g a simila rproble m an d its solution . 5.13. 3 Qualit yAssuranc e Report s t o Managemen t 5.13.3. 1 Interna l Report s Th e Laborator yService s Coordinato rwil l prepar e a writte n report o n Q C activitie s associate d wit h thi s projec t fo rth e Qualit yAssuranc e Director . Thi s report wil l detai l th e result s o fqualit ycontro l procedures , problem s encountere d an d an ycorrectiv e action , whic h ma yhav e bee n required . Al l Correctiv e Actio n Form s ar e submitte d to th e Q AOffice rfo rinitia l approva l ofth e correctiv e actio n planne d an d a cop yi s provide d t o th e Progra m Manager . Al l syste m audi t report s ar e provide d t o th e Progra m Manage ran d th e Qualit yAssuranc e Officer .

Q:\rr^7\Prcj«te\10002022\Veoli a Performanc e Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00268 7Revision : 0
1 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t4 HW C Performanc e Tes t Pla n Pag e 1 8 o f3 7

5.13.3. 2 Report s t o Clien t Th e fina l reportwil l includ e a sectio n summarizin g QA/Q C activitie s durin g th e program . Th e Projec t Manager , Laborator yService s Coordinator s an d th e Q AOffice rwil l participat e i n preparin g thi s section . Thi s sectio n wil l provid e summar yQA/Q C result s fo rmetho d blank s an d laborator ycontro l spik e recoveries . Thi s sectio n wil l evaluat e overal l dat a qualit yi n term s o faccuracy , precisio n an d completeness . An ydiscrepancie s o r difficultie s note d i n progra m work , protoco l deviation s o rdocumentatio n gap s wil l b e identifie d an d discussed .

l

aVm#7\Prqects\10002022\Vi!oJ a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do o



## V E S 00268 8Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit4 HW C Perfonnanc e Tes t Pta n Pag e 1 9 o f37
Tabl e 5-

1 Genera l Samplin g an d Analytica l Progra m Overvie w(Stac k Exhaust )

Paramete r MAC TEmissio n Limit s (a ) Samplin g Metho d Analytica l Metho d Flow , Fixe d Gase s an d Moisture N/ A E P AMethod s 2, 3 an d 4 N/ A Mercur y 13 0 ug/dsc m EP AMetho d 2 9 EP AMetho d 747 1 CVAA S LV M Metai s (As , B e an d Cr ) 9 2 ug/dsc m E P AMetho d 2 9 EP AMetho d 602 0 ICP-M S SV M Metal s (C d an d Pb ) 23 0 ug/dsc m E P AMetho d 2 9 EP AMetho d 602 0 ICP-M S 1

t

I

Q:\rrw97\ProjectsV10002022\Vedl a Performance Tes l Pla n I M R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00268 9Revision : 0 Date : May200 8

, Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t 4 HW C Performance Tes t Pla n Pag e 2 0 o f3 7
Tabl e 5- 2 Q AObjective s fo rFiel d Measurement s Fiel d Measuremen t Accurac y Precisio n Completenes s Moistur e (EP AMetho d 4 ) (a) ±20 % 100 % Carbo n Dioxid e (EP AMetho d 3 - Orsa t Analysis ) - (b ) N/ A 100 % Oxyge n (EP AMetho d 3 -r Orsa t Analysis ) (c ) N/ A 100 % (a ) No t determinable . (b ) A n accurac yo f+ 0.2 % woul d b e expecte d i fa certifie d ga s audi t i s performed . Otherwis e individua l reading s mus t b e withi n 0. 3 g/g-mol e ofth e mea n valu e fo rthre e (replicate ) readings . (c ) A n accurac yo f20.8 % ±0.5 % woul d b e expecte d i fa n ambien t ai raudi t i s performed .

I

i i

O:\mw97\Praiects\10002022WeoS a Perfonnanc e Tes t Ra n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00269 0Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Perfonnanc e TestPIa n Pag e 2 1 o f37

Tabl e 5- 3 Overal l Summar yo fPerformanc e Tes t Stac k Ga s Samplin g an d Analysi s Progra m
Sample Matri

xan d Samplin q Metho

d Analytical

Parameter

s Analytica l

Metho d La b .

(a ) Tota l Samples Analyzed Sample Matri

xan d Samplin q Metho

d Analytical

Parameter

s Analytica l

Metho d La b .

(a ) Tota l Runs Fiel d Blank s Audi t Lab Q C I EP AM 29 Metals (b ) EP AM 6010B/6020/700 0 MA X 3 1 0 1 EP AM 3 QzandCO j EP AM 3 (Orsat ) ENS R 3 0 0 0 Facilit yCE M 0 2 andC O Facilit yCE M Q APla n Veoli a 3 0 0 0 (a ) ' MA X= Maxxa

m Analyti c Veoli a = Veoli a E S Tec h (b ) Targe

t metals include : a

al , Burlington , Ontario nical Solutions rsenic, beryllium , cadmium , chromium , lea d an d mercur

y

a\mw97\Pniiects\10M2022\Veoli a Performanc e Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00269 1Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t 4 HW C Performanc e Tes tPla n Pag e 2 2 of3 7
Tabl e 5- 4 Travers e Poin t Location s STAC K INSID E DIAMETER : 4 8 inche s SAMPLIN G LOCATIONS : 16. 4 diameter s downstrea m 6.5 0 diameter s upstrea m MINIMU M NUMBE R O FTRAVERS E POINT S 1 2 A S SPECIFIE D B YEP AMETHO D 1 : NUMBE R O FTRAVERS E POINT S SAMPLED : 1 2

Percen t o fStac k Travers e Poin t Diamete r Distanc e i n Inche s Numbe r Fro m Insid e Wal l Fro m Insid e Wal l

1 95. 6 45. 9 2 85. 4 41. 0 3 70. 4 33. 8 4 29. 6 14. 2 5 14. 6 7. 0 6 4. 4 2. 1

Q:\mw9nProjecls\10002022\Veoi a Performance Tes l Pla n U 4 R3_0521O8.do cVeoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Performanc e Tes t Pla n Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 •Section : 5. 0 Pag e 2 3 o f37

Tabl e 5- 5 Sampl e Preservatio n an d Holdin g Tim e Requirement s Stac k Ga s Sample s w
Paramete r Matri x Preservatio n Holdin g Tim e Metal s (Metho d 29 ) (excep t Hg ) Aqueou s Cool,4° C 6 month s Metal s (Metho d 29 ) (excep t Hg ) Soli d /Filte r Cool,4° C 6 month s Mercur y(Metho d 29 ) Aqueou s Cool , 4° C 2 8 day s Solid/Filte r Cool,4° C 2 8 day s (a ) Holdin g times wil l b e calculate d fro m th e da yo fsampl e collection .

QArrM97\Proiects\10002022\VBOi a Performance Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00269 3Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : 5. 0 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t 4 HW C Performance Tes t Pla n Pag e 2 4 of3 7
Tabl e 5- 6 Q ARequirement s fo rMetal s i n Stac k Ga s b yICA P o rICP-M S Qualit y Parameter , Metho d Determinatio n Frequenc y Targe t Criteri a Calibratio n Initial analysi s ofstandard s Daff y Analysi s o fcalibratio n chec k standard withi n 10

% o ftru e valu e Calibratio n Continuin g mid-rang e calibratio n

standard A t least onc e befor

e an d afte rsampl e analysi s 90-110 % Calibratio n

Continuin g calibratio n blan k Wit h continuin g calibratio n standard Subject t o interpretatio n Accurac y- IC V Analysi s o fcalibratio n chec k standard Afte rever yinitia l calibratio n 90 % t o 110% o

ftru e valu e Accurac y- fitter

s Analysi s o

fNIS Tstandard reference fitter s o rEP Aaudit filters , ifprovided Onc e pe rtes t 70 % to 130% o freference valu e Accurac y Post-digestio n spikes Onc e pe rtest 70 % t o 130% recover y Precisio n Post-digestio n spike s Onc e pe rtest RP D < o r= 35 % Blanks Fiel d Reagen t Blank s an d Method Blank s On e eac h pe rtes t Evaluate d o n cas e b ycas e basi s | RP D = Relativ

e Percen t Differenc

e ICA P = Inductivel

yCouple d Argo n Plasma ICP-M S = Inductivel

yCouple d Plasma - Mas

s Spectrometr

y ICV= Initia

l Calibration Verification

a:Vnw97\Prtfe<^\1rXH)2022Vveo!i a Performanc e Tes t Pla n I M R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00269 4Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit4 HW C Performance Tes tPla n Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Pag e 2 5 o f37 Figure . 5-

1 Stac k

Samplin g Location s

1 s i l 

## •A

Traversa

i 3 4 

### & &*ZKTD 3 fciTl •

a n 

### 7 ,0 1 4&3 B

* S T i

a\m«a7\Prcjecte\10M2022\Vec* i Performance Tes t Pla n U 4 R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00269 5Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t 4 HW C Performanc e Tes tPla n Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Section : 5. 0 Pag e 2 6 o f3 7 Figur e 5- 2 Exampl e Sampl e Packin g Lis t


## ENSRAECO M 

## SAMPL E PACKIN G LIST Projec tSite : Sampl e Date : Projec tLocation : P.O. # Pronra m Tvpe : ntat e Shipped : 1 ahnratnryProjec tNo. : Coole rNo. : ENS R Office : WESTFOR D DOTBoxNo. : j . : ENS R Contact : Dou a Roec k Sianatur e : 

### FedE

xAirbil l N

j . : Sampl e I D Matrix DescriDtio n Analytica l 

## Parameters . . Instruction s

Fiplrl Nntfis /

Comments

- (1 1 Plpasfi m

h i m this for

m wit h analytical msi fir

s Relinquishe

d b y(Print ) Date : Signature : Time : Receive d b y(Print ) Date : Signature : Time : Analytica l Laboratory :
Relinquishe

d b y(Print ) Date : Signature : Time : Receive d b y(Print ) Date : Signature : Time : Receive d by: Date : Signature : Time :

Q:\rr^7lProjecls\10O02022\Veoli a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R3_0521O8.do c



## V E S 00269 6Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit 4 HW C Performanc e Tes tPla n Section : Appendice s



# Appendi xA Unit4 Proces s Flo

wDiagra m

Qtaw97\Projects\10002022\Veoli a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R 3 052108.do c



## V E S 00269 7

## V E S 00269 8Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUnit4 HW C Performance Tes tRa n Revision : 0 Date : Ma y200 8 Section : Appendice s



# Appendi xB Fiel d Dat a Sampl e Collectio n Form s

i

Q:\rnw97\r^,ecls\10002022\VeoS a Performance Tes tPla n U 4 R3_052108.do o



## V E S 00269 9

## ENS R AECO M EP A ISOKINETI C SAMPLIN G- FIEL D DAT A SHEE T SamplingTrai n RunNumber

. Clien t Facilit yLocatio n Sourc e Dat e | Operato r Stac k Dla , - in , Stnr t Tim e Sto p Tim e Bi t r o metri c Prcstur c Stati c Pressur e{+/-) Probe/Plto t

Numbe r Plto l Coefficient Filte r Bo xNo . Mete r Bo xNo . Orlllc eCoefficien t

(Y ) Delt aH ® Nonl o Stec/No . X A D Thermocoupl eID : Imp Outle t

T C ID i LEA K CHECK S l n"H g INITIA LVAC , In . CF M M I D VAC , tn . CF M FINA LVAC . In . CF M INIT . PITOT . FINA LPITO T

FILTE RDAT A

li t i J u '

< m w 

## o o r o o o

# ENS R AECO M ORSA TANALYSI S (EP AMETHO D 3 ) PLANT : PRE-LEA KCHECK : DATE : POST-LEA KCHECK : LOCATION : 

### NOTE : Vali d Leak

Check : Liqui d leve l mus tno t fal l belo wbotto m o fcapillar ytubing i n 4 minute

s an d meniscus mus

tno tchange b

ymor e than 0. 2 m L i n 4 minutes. SAMPL E TYP E : 

### NOTE : Vali d Leak

Check : Liqui d leve l mus tno t fal l belo wbotto m o fcapillar ytubing i n 4 minute

s an d meniscus mus

tno tchange b

ymor e than 0. 2 m L i n 4 minutes. OPERATOR : 

### NOTE : Vali d Leak

Check : Liqui d leve l mus tno t fal l belo wbotto m o fcapillar ytubing i n 4 minute

s an d meniscus mus

tno tchange b

ymor e than 0. 2 m L i n 4 minutes. NOTE S /

DAT ACRITERIA - C 0 2 : Whe n greate rtha n 4% , differenc e betwee n reading s shal l b e 0.3 % o rless .

Whe n les s tha n 4% , differenc e betwee n reading s shal l b e 0.2 % o rless . 0 2 : Whe n greate rtha n o requa l t o 15% , differenc e betwee n reading s shal l b e 0.2 % o rless .

Whe n les s tha n 15% , differenc e betwee n reading s shal l b e 0.3 % o rless . Tes tCondition : Run : Readin g A Readin g B Readin g C Avg . Ne t Volum e G A S Actua l Ne t Actua l Ne t Actua l Ne t Avg . Ne t Volum e 

## co 2


## o 2

## *
Run : Readin g A Readin g B Readin g C Avg . Ne t Vplum e G A S Actua l Ne t Actua l Ne t Actua l Ne t Avg . Ne t Vplum e C 0 2 • i

0 2* Run : Readin g A Readin g B . Readin g C Avg . Ne t Volum e GA S Actua l Ne t Actua l Ne t Actua l Ne t Avg . Ne t Volum e 

## co 2
0 2*

*Net0 2i s actua l 0 2minu s actua l C0 2reading . Q:\rnw97Vrojeclsi1000202Z\Appendi xB_al l urals\rOreatAndy3isFc-mi.xis] A



## V E S 00270 1

## SAMPL E TRAI N MOISTUR E RECOVER YDAT ASHEE T Referenc eMetho d/ Samplin gTrai n: Recovere

d by: ' Recovere d by : Recovere d by : Ru nNo. Date : Ru nNo. Date : Ru nNo. Date : Filte rNo. : FQte rNo. : Filte rNo. : I mpinge rNo . an d Volum e I m pinge rNo . an d Volum e I m pinge rNo . an d Volum e No . Initia l

(mL) . Fina l

(mL ) Rins e (mL ) No . Initia l

(mL ) Fina l (mL ) Rins e (mL ) No . Initia l

(mL) Fina l

(mL ) Rins e (mL ) 1 1 1

2 2 2
3 3 3

4 4 4

5 5 5
6 6 6

7 7 7 DIFF : DIFF : 7 DIFF : Total s Total s Total s

' *- y' ',. Initia l (g ) Fina l

(9 ) initia l (g) Fina l

(g) 

## - Initia l (g ) Fina l

(g) ' *- y' ',. Initia l (g ) Fina l

(9 ) DIFF : initia l (g) Fina l

(g) DIFF : 

## - Initia l (g ) Fina l

(g) DIFF : Silic a Ge l Silic a Ge l Silic a Ge l Fina l Net Moistur e Gain : Fina l Ne t Moistur e Gain : Fina l Ne t Moisture Gain : Q:\mwv97\PTpiecls\10002022\Appendi KBjal l unil5\lM4Recovery.xlsJ A



## V E S 00270 2

# NOZZL E CALIBRATIO N FOR M Client : . Project* : Date : _ ^ Calibrate d by :

Nozzl e I D # D, , in . D 2 , in . D 3 , in . Delt a D , in . D avg , in .

Where : Di^, 3 = Nozzl e diamete rmeasure d o n a differen t diamete rt o th e neares t 0.00 1 in . Delt a D = Maximu m differenc e betwee n an ytw o measurements , in .

Toleranc e = 0.00 4 in . D a v g= Averag e o fD , i 2 3
Q:Vnw97\Projects\10002022\Arjpendi xB_al l unifca[Noz2leCaKbForm.xls]A



## V E S 00270 3Revision : 0 Date : May200 8 Veoli a E S Technica l MAC TUni t 4 HW C Performance Tes tPla n Section : Appendice s



# Appendi xC Isokineti c Samplin g Trai n Setu p an d Recover ySchematic s

Q:\mw97TProjecls\10002022\Veofe Performanc e Tes l Pla n I M R3_052108.do c



## V E S 00270 4

# SAMPL E TRAI N SETU P MULTIMETAL

S (a s PerEPAMetho

d 2 9 / 0060 )

IMPINGER S 1s t 2n d 3r d 4t h 5t h 6t h 7t h empt y* 10 0 m L 5 % HN0 3/

10 % H 2 0 2 10 0 m L 5 % HNO

3 /10 % H z O z empt y 10 0 m L 10 % H 2 S 0 4 7 4 % KMn0 4

. 10 0 m L 10 % H 2 S 0 4/ 4 % KMnO , Silic a Ge l
FIEL D BLANK S (Exac tVolume s Specifie d b yMethod )
0. 1 N HN0 3 5%HNO 3 /10%H 2 O 2 10%H 2 S O 4 /4%KMnO 4 D l Wate r 8 N HC I
Filte r 30 0 m L 20 0 m L 10 0 m L 10 0 m L 2 5 m L (adde d t o 20 0 m L water ) On e unuse d filte r optiona l - use d fo rhig h moistur e stack s

Q'.toiv»97\Projects\10002022\AppendixCal l unils\[selupM60.KlspMOlS T



## V E S 00270 5

### NOZZL E

Brush/ 0. 1 N (~25r TCnse HN0 3 

### nU3 X PROB E

Brush/ 0. 1 N ( - 50 n Rins e 

### HNO 3 dU3 X FRON THAL F FILTE R HOUSIN G 

## FILTE R

Brush/Rins e 0.INHNO 3 f~25mLl3 X Carefull yremove filter fro m suppor

fwit h Teflon coate d tweezers an d plac e i n petr i dis h

25 0 m L Ambe r Brus h loos e particulate ont o petr i dis h
FH-HNO a (2) Containe r3 Sea l petr i dis h wit h tape

Notel : Exactl y10 0 m L o f0.1 N HN0 3 use d fo rrinsin g nozzle , prob e an d F H filte r housing . Not e 2 : Nozzle , prob e an d F H filte rhousin g ar e rinse d wit h wate rfollowe d b yaceton e afte rth e nitri c aci d rinse . Th e wate ran d aceton e ar e the n discarded . Filte r 

## ( D Containe r1



## METHO D 29 (METALS ) RECOVER YSCHEMATI C FRON THAL FRECOVER Y Pag e 1 o f2

J:\Air_Tox\Schematics\Recovery\M29FH.doc



## V E S 00270 6

# ENS R AECO M IMPINGER S

FILTE R SUPPOR TAN D BAC K HAL F O F FILTE R HOUSIN G 1 1 1 (Empty ) (Optional )

Rins e Thre e Time s with 0. 1 N Nitri c Aci d 2" " an d 3 M 

### (HNO3/H2O2

)

Measur e Volum e

Emptythe int o C c Content s ntaine r

Rins e T h with 0. 1 N ree Time s

Nitri c Aci d

Note : Exactl y10 0 m L o f nitri c aci d i s use d t o rins e al l component s u p throug h impinger s 1-3 . Measure Volum e

Emptyth e Content s int o Containe r

Rins e Th r wit h 0. 1 N ee Time s

vlitric Aci d

95 0 m L B H (Containe r4)



# < m c o o o r o

--1 

### o -v l 4 t h(Empty ) 5 l h an d 6 t h (KMn0 4 )

Measur e Volum e

Emptyth e Impinge r No . 4 Content s int

o Containe r

Rins e wit h 10

0 m L 

### 0. 1 N HNO

3

25 0 m L 

### 0. 1 N HNO

3 (Containe r5A) 

### • 7

m (Silic a Gel )

Weig h fo rMoistur

e Discar d

Emptyth e Impinge r Nos . 5 an d 6 Content s into Containe r
Rins e Thre e Tlmes.wlt h Permanganat e Reagent , (100 m L total ) the n with Wate r (100 m L total )

50 0 m L KMn0 4 (Containe r5B ) Remov e An y Residu e with 2 5 m L 8 N HC I Solutio n

25 0 m L 8 N HC I (Containe r5C )
J:\Ai rTox\Schematics\Recoverv\M29BH.doc METHO D 2 9 (METALS ) RECOVER YSCHEMATIC - BAC K HAL FRECOVER Y

Pag e 2 o f2