alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.0

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the
Report) by Intervest Bancshares Corporation (the Company), each of the undersigned, as the principal executive and principal financial officers of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to §. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lowell S. Dansker                                  
|Lowell S. Dansker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                          
|April 29, 2011                                         



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John J. Arvonio                                    
|John J. Arvonio, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                          
|April 29, 2011                                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H49]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, proceedings 
will resume on motions to suspend the rules previously postponed.
  Votes will be taken in the following order:
  H.R. 35, by the yeas and nays;
  H.R. 36, by the yeas and nays.
  The first electronic vote will be conducted as a 15-minute vote. The 
second electronic vote will be conducted as a 5-minute vote.

                          ____________________
```
# Official Journal L 130/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.130.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 130 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5417 May 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.130.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 130

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5417 May 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/278/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2011) 2772) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2011/278/EU

*

Commission Decision of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2011) 2772)

(notified under document C(2011) 2772)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>





                                FORM OF AGREEMENT

                  AGREEMENT by and between Baby Superstore, Inc., a South
Carolina corporation (the "Company") and Linda M. Robertson (the "Executive"),
dated as of _______ __, 1996.

                  IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

                  For three years after the date of termination for any reason
of the Executive's employment with the Company, or such longer period as may be
provided by the terms of the appropriate plan, program, practice or policy, the
Company shall provide welfare benefits to the Executive and/or the Executive's
family at least equal, in the aggregate, to those benefits provided under the
most favorable of the welfare benefit plans, practices, policies and programs
(including, without limitation, medical, prescription, dental, disability,
employee life, group life, accidental death and travel accident insurance plans
and programs) in effect for the Executive at any time during the 120-day period
immediately preceding the date hereto or, if more favorable to the Executive,
those provided generally at any time after the date hereto to other peer
executives of the Company and its affiliated companies, provided, however, that
if the Executive becomes reemployed with another employer and is eligible to
receive medical or other welfare benefits under another employer provided plan,
the medical and other welfare benefits described herein shall be secondary to
those provided under such other plan during such applicable period of
eligibility.


                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the
Executive's hand and, pursuant to the authorization from its Board of Directors,
the Company has caused these presents to be executed in its name on its behalf,
all as of the day and year first above written.




                                                        Linda M. Robertson




                                        BABY SUPERSTORE, INC.



                                        By
1

Benefits in 2030

 2030 shows effects of full program and approaches full fleet

turnover

 PM-related Premature Mortality

 660 to 1,500 avoided (Krewski et al., 2009 & Lepeule et al., 2012)

 Proposal: 670 to 1,700 avoided (Pope et al., 2002 & Laden et al., 2006)

 Ozone-related Premature Mortality

 110 to 500 avoided (based on range of six studies)

 Proposal: 160 to 710 avoided (based on range of same studies)

 Total Monetized Benefits

 $7.4 to $19 Billion (3% DR); $6.7 to $18 Billion (7% DR)

 Proposal: $8.0 to $23 Billion (3% DR); $7.4 to $21 Billion (7% DR)

 Total Costs

 $1.5 Billion

 Proposal: $3.4 Billion

 Benefit-to-Cost Ratio

 4.5 to 13

 Proposal: 2.2 to 6.8

Draft - Deliberative
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRITY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000003941               
<NAME>         ALLIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION               
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1997           
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1997             
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1.000       
<CASH>                                         609 
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                               55,260    
<ALLOWANCES>                                   531    
<INVENTORY>                                 78,702       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           147,228    
<PP&E>                                      94,332    
<DEPRECIATION>                              48,811    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             199,783     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       95,736    
<BONDS>                                        670
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       140
<OTHER-SE>                                  92,884   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               199,783    
<SALES>                                    270,562    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           270,562
<CGS>                                      204,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              204,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            34,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             31,489   
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,518   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         19,971   
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                19,971   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.65 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.62 
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-60454

____________

JAMES BRADDOCK,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEGGETT & PLATT,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

(1:96-CV-29-D-D)

March 31, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leggett & Platt (“Leggett”) appeals from a judgment in favor

of James Braddock, awarding $33,000 in compensatory damages and

$50,000 in punitive damages for discriminatory discharge in

violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”),

Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 12101

et seq.

Because the district court has yet to rule on Braddock’s

timely filed Motion for Reinstatement or, Alternatively, for Front
2

Pay——a matter intimately tied to the merits of Braddock’s claim and

clearly “an element of [his] complete compensation”——Leggetts’

notice of appeal is “ineffective” pursuant to the Federal Rules of

Appellate Procedure. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a) (“A notice of appeal

filed after . . . entry of the judgment but before disposition of

[a motion to alter or amend the judgment under FED. R. CIV. P. 59]

is ineffective to appeal from the . . . judgment . . . until the

entry of the order disposing of the . . . outstanding [motion].”);

Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney, 489 U.S. 169, 175-76, 109 S. Ct. 987,

991-92, 103 L. Ed. 2d 146 (1989) (holding that motions involving

“an element of [the] plaintiff’s complete compensation” and

requiring the consideration of “matters encompassed within the

merits of the underlying action,” such as whether a particular

award is “necessary to compensate the plaintiff fully,” constitute

a “motion to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59(e)”)

(internal quotation and alteration omitted).

The appeal is DISMISSED without prejudice.
United States of America

 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

______________________________________

SECRETARY OF LABOR, :

 Complainant, :

 . : OSHRC DOCKET NO. 08-1104 v

 

 :

IMPERIAL SUGAR COMPANY,

IMPERIAL-SAVANNAH, L.P., 

 Respondents, :

_______________________________________

ORDER PERMITTING ORAL ARGUMENT AND REPLY BRIEF 

For good cause shown, the Respondents’ Motion (1) for Telephonic Oral Argument and 

(2) to File a Reply Brief Regarding Respondents’ Motion to Depose OSHA Compliance Officers

is hereby GRANTED. A telephonic conference limited to 30 minutes will be held at 11:30 a.m.,

on Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Complainant and Respondent shall be limited to 15 minutes each to

present their arguments. The Respondents shall have until Thursday, March 26, 2009, to file a

Reply in support of said Motion, said reply brief (1) will be limited to 5 pages; (2) will be limited

to a reply to Complainant’s arguments; (3) will address the precise paragraph of Complainant’s

response to which a reply is being made; and (4) will not make any statement or argument that

advances any new grounds for relief, supplements any ground for relief, or repeats arguments set

forth in the initial motion.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2009.

/s/ Covette Rooney

COVETTE ROONEY

U.S. OSHRC JUDGE
 United States of America

 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

______________________________

SECRETARY OF LABOR, :

 Complainant, :

 : OSHRC DOCKET NO. 08-1104 v

 

IMPERIAL SUGAR COMPANY and :

IMPERIAL-SAVANNAH, L.P.,

 Respondents. :

__________________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that all parties have consented that all papers required to be served may 

be served and filed electronically. I further certify that a copy of the ORDER PERMITTING ORAL

ARGUMENT AND REPLY BRIEF served on March 19, 2009, on the following parties: 

Charles H. Morgan, Esq. 

charlie.morgan@alston.com

Matthew J. Gilligan, Esq. 

matt.gilligan@alston.com

Ashley D. Brightwell, Esq. 

ashley.brightwell@alston.com

Jeremy D. Tucker, Esq. 

jeremy.tucker@alston.com 

KAREN E. MOCK, Esq 

Mock.karen@dol.gov

ANGELA F. DONALDSON, Esq. 

Donaldson.angela@dol.gov

 /s/ Covette Rooney

 COVETTE ROONEY

 U.S. OSHRC JUDGE
3
1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2832

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Douglas Franklin, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 7, 2007 Filed: November 28, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Douglas Franklin appeals the 63-month prison sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to being a fe lon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On appeal, Franklin’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that it would be a miscarriage of justice to enforce the appeal waiver, because, at the time Franklin signed the plea agreement, neither party contemplated that Franklin would not receive a 2-level acceptance-of-responsib ility reduction or that he would receive-2- a 2-level obstruction-of-justice enhancement, both of which counsel further maintains were based upon clearly erroneous findings.
Franklin’s written plea agreement cont ains a valid appeal waiver which encompasses the argument that counsel rais es on appeal, and we conclude that the waiver is enforceable and that enforcing it would not cause a mi scarriage of justice. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam ) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case).
After reviewing the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and finding no non-frivolous issues not covered by the waiver, we enforce the waiver and dismiss this appeal. We gran t counsel’s motion to withdraw on condition that counsel inform appellant about the pr ocedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for certiorari.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2284-E2285]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          EARMARK DECLARATION

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. KENNY C. HULSHOF

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. HULSHOF. Madam Speaker, consistent with the Republican 
leadership's policy on earmarks, I am requesting funding for Special 
Operations Forces Advanced Mission Planning Tools in fiscal year 2009, 
in H.R. 2638, Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2008, 
Continuing Resolution, from account 31 0603003A Aviation Advanced 
Technology. The entity to receive funding for this project is the 
Westar Aerospace & Defense Group, Inc., 4 Research Park Drive, St. 
Charles, MO 63304-5685. The funding would be used for the continued 
development of enterprise-enabled, integrated aviation tools and 
provide this ability to all Army aviation systems. I certify that 
neither I nor my spouse has any financial interest in this project.

[[Page E2285]]

  I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge this request (1) is 
not directed to an entity or program named or will be named after a 
sitting Member of Congress; (2) is not intended for a ``front'' or 
``pass through'' entity; and (3) meets or exceeds all statutory 
requirements for matching funds where applicable. I further certify 
that should this request be included in the bill, I will place a 
statement in the Congressional Record describing how the funds will be 
spent and justifying the use of Federal taxpayer funds.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 46 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 46

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the final rule of the National Park Service 
 relating to ``General Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

  Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Biggs, Mrs. Black, Mrs. Radewagen, Mr. 
 Newhouse, and Mr. Gohmert) submitted the following joint resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the final rule of the National Park Service 
 relating to ``General Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to ``General 
Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights'' (81 Fed. Reg. 77972 
(November 4, 2016)), and such policy shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2004245EN.01S00301.xml

| 17.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 245/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 245/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

In view of the situation which has arisen following enlargement, some editions of the Official Journal of 30 April 2004 have been published, in a simplified manner, in the 11 official languages of that date.

It has been decided to republish, as corrigenda and in the Official Journal’s traditional presentation, Acts which appear in those Official Journals.

It is for this reason that Official Journals which contain only those corrigenda have been published in the 11 pre-enlargement language versions. The translations of Acts in the languages of the new Member States will be published in a special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union comprising texts of the institutions and the European Central Bank adopted prior to 1 May 2004.

Given below is a list of the Official Journals published on 30 April and their corresponding corrigenda.

| OJ of 30 April 2004 | Corrected OJ |
| --- | --- |
| L 139 | L 226 of 25 June |
| L 144 | L 199 of 7 June |
| L 146 | L 225 of 25 June |
| L 149 | L 215 of 16 June |
| L 150 | L 185 of 24 May |
| L 151 | L 208 of 10 June |
| L 152 | L 216 of 16 June |
| L 153 | L 231 of 30 June |
| L 154 | L 189 of 27 May |
| L 155 | L 193 of 1 June |
| L 156 | L 202 of 7 June |
| L 157 | L 195 of 2 June |
| L 158 | L 229 of 29 June |
| L 159 | L 184 of 24 May |
| L 160 | L 212 of 12 June |
| L 161 | L 206 of 9 June |
| L 164 | L 220 of 21 June |
| L 165 | L 191 of 28 May |
| L 166 | L 200 of 7 June |
| L 167 | L 201 of 7 June |

OJ of 30 April 2004

Corrected OJ

L 139

L 226 of 25 June

L 144

L 199 of 7 June

L 146

L 225 of 25 June

L 149

L 215 of 16 June

L 150

L 185 of 24 May

L 151

L 208 of 10 June

L 152

L 216 of 16 June

L 153

L 231 of 30 June

L 154

L 189 of 27 May

L 155

L 193 of 1 June

L 156

L 202 of 7 June

L 157

L 195 of 2 June

L 158

L 229 of 29 June

L 159

L 184 of 24 May

L 160

L 212 of 12 June

L 161

L 206 of 9 June

L 164

L 220 of 21 June

L 165

L 191 of 28 May

L 166

L 200 of 7 June

L 167

L 201 of 7 June

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E53]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       HONORING SPECIAL KIDS DAY

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. PETER J. ROSKAM

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, January 9, 2009

  Mr. ROSKAM. Madam Speaker, I rise today to recognize an important 
community service organization located in Elmhurst, Illinois in my 
congressional district called Special Kids Day.
  Special Kids Day was created in 1990 as a holiday event for children 
with special needs and their families to visit Santa Claus without 
obstacles. This venture has evolved into a not-for-profit organization 
dedicated to providing celebratory events for children with 
disabilities and their families in an environment designed to 
accommodate their special needs.
  On the first Wednesday each December, Special Kids Day holds their 
flagship event. Volunteers help children get their picture taken with 
Santa and distribute goodie bags with toys and candy. Other surprises 
from face painters to balloon animals help make these events a 
memorable time for special needs children. All of this allows these 
children and their families to enjoy the magic of the Christmas season 
without some of the challenges of making a trip to the mall at the 
holidays.
  Today, the Special Kids Day organization has grown to include dozens 
of volunteers who serve hundreds of families in the Chicagoland area. 
For the first time, Special Kids Day also began holding a Carnival Day 
at the Annual Elmfest in Elmhurst this year.
  Madam Speaker and distinguished colleagues, please join me in 
honoring the time and effort of Special Kids Day volunteers. This 
organization's selfless, charitable spirit is what makes Illinois' 
Sixth District such a pleasure to represent.

                          ____________________
```