alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<CIK>                      0000927632
<NAME>                     INDIANTOWN COGENERATION, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                              28,732,890
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       13,774,244
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         1,080,898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    44,738,087
<PP&E>                              638,213,448
<DEPRECIATION>                      69,170,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      715,038,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               36,166,796
<BONDS>                             591,252,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        715,038,932
<SALES>                             44,106,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    44,106,240
<CGS>                               21,495,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       24,257,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    2,762,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  14,453,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     5,793,875
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           920,356
<NET-INCOME>                        6,714,231
<EPS-BASIC>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 3.3


                           CERTIFICATE OF ELIMINATION
                                       OF
              14 1/4% SENIOR EXCHANGEABLE PREFERRED STOCK, SERIES A
                                       OF
                        SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.


         Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Company"),

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors by unanimous written consent of its
members, duly adopted resolutions setting forth the proposed elimination of the
existing 14 1/4% Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $.01
per share (the "1999 Series A Preferred Stock"), as set forth herein:

                           RESOLVED, that no shares of the Corporation's 1999
                  Series A Preferred Stock are outstanding and none will be
                  issued;

                           FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Authorized Officers are
                  hereby authorized to approve, execute and file with the
                  Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a Certificate of
                  Elimination, which shall have the effect when filed and
                  recorded in Delaware of eliminating from the Third Amended and
                  Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation all
                  reference to the 1999 Series A Preferred Stock;

         SECOND: None of the authorized shares of the 1999 Series A Preferred
Stock are outstanding and none will be issued.

         THIRD: In accordance with the provisions of Section 151 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Third Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company is hereby amended to eliminate all
reference to the Series A Preferred Stock.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this certificate to be
signed by its duly appointed officer, this 28th day of October, 2003.




                                       SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.


                                       By:/s/ Joseph A. Garcia
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Joseph A. Garcia
                                          Title: Chief Financial Officer,
                                                 Executive Vice
                                                 President and Secretary
## James M. Stephens is New Job Safety and Health Commissioner
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for March 2024

    1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month							27

    2. Cases Added to Docket									 1
K V Inc.
22-0339
Direction for Review on March 21, 2024


    3. Cases Subtracted from Docket								 0
												
			 
    4. Total Cases Pending End of Month							28
ALLIED RESEARCH CORPORATION              EXHIBIT 21

                                 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





1.      Mecar S.A., a Belgian Corporation

        Wholly-owned and majority owned Belgian subsidiaries of Mecar S.A.


               A. Sedachim, S.I.

               B. Tele Technique Generale

               C. VSK Electronics N.V.

                      Belgian Automation Units, N.V. (100% owned)

                      I.D.C.S., N.V.

                      VSK Electronics, S.A. (a French Company)

2.      Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

3.      Allied Research Corporation Limited, a U.K. Corporation

4.      Allied Environmental, Inc.

5.      ARC Services, Inc.
Avg Nox exc Validation

Date & Hour Plant Status Average AIT607

Nox (ppm)

8/1/09 0:00 84.15

8/1/09 1:00 79.22

8/1/09 2:00 88.57

8/1/09 3:00 89.42

8/1/09 4:00 81.52

8/1/09 5:00 84.52

8/1/09 6:00 82.94

8/1/09 7:00 83.25

8/1/09 8:00 96.75

8/1/09 9:00 72.59

8/1/09 10:00 65.08

8/1/09 11:00 63.53

8/1/09 12:00 59.03

8/1/09 13:00 60.52

8/1/09 14:00 70.80

8/1/09 15:00 84.10

8/1/09 16:00 78.56

8/1/09 17:00 77.72

8/1/09 18:00 65.36

8/1/09 19:00 72.77

8/1/09 20:00 70.19

8/1/09 21:00 76.85

8/1/09 22:00 72.66

8/1/09 23:00 72.23

8/2/09 0:00 71.37

8/2/09 1:00 76.27

8/2/09 2:00 71.80

8/2/09 3:00 68.40

8/2/09 4:00 60.55

8/2/09 5:00 60.36

8/2/09 6:00 65.68

8/2/09 7:00 56.67

8/2/09 8:00 Plant shut down 07:30

0900006480f37c56.xls Hourly NOx 1 of 1 9/27/2011 10:53 AM
#### Moen, Respondent, vs. Madison Railways Company, Appellant.

*May 1*

June *4, 1929.*

*170For the appellant there was a brief by *Sclmbring, Ryan, Clarke & Petersen*of Madison, and oral argument by *William Ryan.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *HiU, Thomann & Beckwith,*and oral argument by *John T. Harrington,*all of Madison.

Fowler, J.

A mere general allegation of negligence is a conclusion of law rather than an allegation of fact, and is not admitted by a demurrer. The allegations of “adequate” and “proper” warning, if they are to be construed as a statement that the motorman either heard, or by the exercise of due care would have heard, the warning, are also conclusions rather than facts. It is of the essence of negligence that the person charged should have knowledge that there was a duty for him to perform; knowledge of the facts out of which the duty to act arises is essential; in order that an .act or omission may be regarded as negligent, the person charged must have knowledge or ought to have known from the circumstances that the act or omission charged involved danger to another. '45 Corp. Jur. p. 651, §§ 24, 25. To the same general effect are *Routt v. Look,*180 Wis. 1, 191 N. W. 557; *Wickert v. Wis. Cent. R. Co.*142 Wis. 375, 125 N. W. 943; *Case v. Hobart,*25 Wis. 654.

We are of the opinion that without an allegation that the motorman heard the gong, or an allegation that the defendant or its servant or agent committed or omitted some act because of which, if not committed or omitted, the motorman would, in the exercise of ordinary care, have discovered the approach of the fire truck, the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

*By the Court.*— The order appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to sustain the demurrer.
Page 1 of 1 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission 

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on July31, 2021 

 DOCKET 

NUMBER 

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME 

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING 

NOTICE 

DATE 

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING 

1 18-0034 Armstrong Utilities, Inc. d/b/a 

Armstrong Cable Services 10/15/19 DFR 10/24/19 Closed 

 2 17-0138 Home Rubber Company, LP 10/22/19 DFR 11/04/19 Closed 

3 18-0758 RoadSafe Traffic Systems, 

Inc. 10/30/19 DFR 11/01/19 Closed 

4 17-0737 

UHS of Westwood 

Pembroke, Inc. 

UHS of Delaware, Inc. 

03/19/20 DFR 03/25/20 Closed 

5 18-1451 Summit Contracting Group, 

Inc. 08/24/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed 

6 16-1713 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed 

7 16-1813 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed 

8 16-1872 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed 

9 17-0023 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed 

10 17-0279 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed 

11 16-1865 AJM Packaging 

Corporation 10/07/20 DFR 10/14/20 Closed 

12 19-0723 Midwest Equipment 

Company 10/23/20 DFR 11/25/20 Closed 

13 16-1587 TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc. 11/18/20 DFR 12/10/20 Closed 

14 18-1864 Henkels & McCoy, Inc. 12/07/20 DFR 12/23/20 Closed 

15 18-0242 Onekey, LLC 02/05/21 DFR 02/18/21 Open 

16 18-0731 

UHS of Delaware, Inc. and 

Premier Behavioral Health 

Solutions of Florida, Inc. 

d/b/a Suncoast Behavioral 

Health Center

05/19/21 DFR 05/21/21 Open 

17 18-1287 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Open 

18 18-1288 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Open 

 *DFR – Direction For Review 

 REM – Appellate Remand 

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,712
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,428
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          83,691
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            81,465
<LOANS>                                        100,667
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,047
<DEPOSITS>                                     169,648
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,325
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,020
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,940
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,498
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 202,047
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,184
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,481
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   200
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,865
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,989
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,308
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,557
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      335
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    975
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         975
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (128)
<NET-INCOME>                                       452
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.23
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,662
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,997
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,997
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 83 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.83

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
``Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation to Make and Maintain 
       an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Clarification 
of Employer's Continuing Obligation to Make and Maintain an Accurate 
Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness'' (published at 81 Fed. 
Reg. 91792 (December 19, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,945-01

IN RE LEONARD RAY JACKSON, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 2002CR5940 IN THE 175 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he wrote to the Bexar County District Clerk

requesting an estimate of costs for copies of his trial transcripts, but has received no response. 

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Bexar

County, is ordered to file a response stating whether she received a request from the Relator for a

statement of costs for his trial records. If the District Clerk received such a request, she shall state

the nature of her response and, if available, provide a copy of the response. If the District Clerk

received such a request and did not respond, she shall provide her rationale for not responding. This
2

application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has

submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of

this order.

Filed: September 17, 2014

Do not publish
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 19 

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding reconsideration of the merits 

of awarding the Medal of Honor posthumously to Doris Miller for acts 

of valor during World War II for which he was originally awarded 

the Navy Cross. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding reconsideration 

of the merits of awarding the Medal of Honor posthumously to Doris Miller for acts of valor during World 

War II for which he was originally awarded the Navy 

Cross. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the Sec3 retary of the Navy should reconsider, pursuant to the 

4 process authorized by section 1130 of title 10, United 

5 States Code, whether the award of the Navy Cross to 

6 Doris Miller (service number 356–12–35) for acts of valor 

7 during the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 19 IH 

1 while a member of the United States Navy should be up2 graded to the Medal of Honor on account of possible racial 

3 bias in the original decision to award the Navy Cross. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Glenogle Company, Appellant, vs. City of Milwaukee and others, Respondents.

*February 10*

March *7, 1933.*

For the appellant there were briefs by *Walter J. Matti-son,*attorney, and *Gold & McCann, Walter D. Corrigan, Sr.,*and *Attgust C. Backus*of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. MaMison, Mr. J. E. Porter, Mr. Corrigan, Mr. Walter L. Gold,*and *Mr. Backus,*all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Max Raskin,*city attorney, *William F. Quick,*first assistant city attorney, *Herbert C. Hirschboeck*and *H. A. Kovenock,*assistant city attorneys, and oral argument by *Mr. Quick, Mr. Hirsch-boeck,*and *Mr. Kovenock.*

Fowler, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *Schlitz Realty Corporation v. City of Milwaukee, ante,*p. 62, 247 N. W. 459, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Court.*— The judgment and orders of the circuit court are affirmed.
# Official Journal C 170/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 170 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6612 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 170

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6612 May 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 170/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2023/2 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2023/C 170/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2023/2 (
  1
  ) | 18 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 170/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2023/2 (
  1
  )

1

1

2023/C 170/02

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2023/2 (
  1
  )

1

18

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

WAYNE FARMS, LLC,

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 17-1174

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief the issues presented in the Secretary’s petition for 

discretionary review. The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to 

consider either the merits or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty 

is also subject to review. Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty 

if they so choose.

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief 

is to be filed within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify 

the Commission in writing within the applicable time for filing briefs, and shall serve a 

copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of intent) of opposing 

parties shall commence on the date of service.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: March 21, 2019 /s/

John X. Cerveny

Executive Secretary

 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the lefthand margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. 

The Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, 

regulations, case law, law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the 

Commission and to the opposing party. Parties should be cautioned that these materials 

will be considered only if appropriate.
# CE2004065EN.01017701.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/177 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/177

---

(2004/C 65 E/193)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2555/03

by Robert Evans (PSE) to the Commission

(4 August 2003)

Subject:   Cross-channel ferry operators

Subject:

The Commission has previously been questioned on the suggested cartel pricing practices of the cross-channel ferry companies and Eurotunnel (P-3419/00 (1)). In his response, Commissioner Monti expressed concern that there should be ‘effective competition between cross-channel operators’.

1

Several constituents have contacted me to suggest that there is effectively a cartel operating between the ferry companies and Eurotunnel. For example, although various prices are quoted, GBP 300 appears to be the cost of crossings for five-day returns for summer trips. They feel they are comparatively paying more for this particular route than other ferry crossings in the EU (offered by Greek and Italian ferry companies). More information can be found on a website that has been established by those unhappy with these companies, http://www.channelpirates.com

Could the Commission comment on the pricing practices of the ferry companies and Eurotunnel operators, and whether it believes the companies are operating in an anti-competitive way?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(22 September 2003)

(22 September 2003)

The Honourable Member may know that the Commission has recently carried out simultaneous unannounced inspections at the premises of a number of operators of cross-Channel transport services (2). The purpose of these inspections was indeed to ascertain whether these companies are inter alia fixing prices and trade conditions for cross-Channel transport services, as suggested by the information referred to by the Honourable Member.

2

Such surprise inspections are a preliminary step in investigations into suspected cartels. As the Honourable Member will understand, the Commission can at this early stage of the investigation not make any further comments on the case.

---

(1)  OJ C 151 E, 22.5.2001, p. 164.

1

(2)  ΙΡ/03/168 of 3 September 2003; Spokeperson's Statement on inspections in cross-Channel transport services.

2

---
consent.htm




 







Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141766) pertaining to Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 11, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 7, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H.


 


                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


 


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


October 27, 2010