alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3 Benjamin Z. Smith

UAV Aviation Services Inc. (UAS,Inc.)

827 W. Trindle Rd.

Mechanicsburg, PA 17055

717.278.7502

benjamin.smith@uavaviationservices.com

04 September 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Petition to Amend Exemption No. 12353 Issued to UAS, Inc.

(Docket No. FAA

- 205

- 1071)

Dear Sir or Madam:

UAS, Inc. was issued Exemption No. 12353 o n August 5, 2015 (hereinafter “the Exemption ”)

, allowing operation of the Hawkeye Mk

- III, Microdrones MD4

- 1000 and MD4

- 3000 models

. Petitioner hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow additional types of small

UAS under the same conditions and limitations of the Exemption.

UAS, Inc. seeks to add the DJI Phantom 3 Advanced, and the DJI Phantom 3 Professional (t ogether, “DJI Phantom 3”), the Sense F ly eBee, Sense F ly eXom and Sense F ly Ag.

UAS, Inc. believes this to continue to be in the public interest as these models reduce hazards

and emissions associated with manned aircraft, and the vehicles are light weight and do not carry

passe ngers

, crew

, or any flammable fuel.Page 2 of 3 The models to be consider ed for addition to the E xemption are all smaller aircraft than those cu rrentl y approved for use by UAS, Inc., wit h similar safety and operating capabilities.

All models are considered Micro, and have been approved by the FAA in one or more prior e xemptions (only one example listed for clarity) :

Make: DJI

Model: Phantom 3 Advanced

Type: Rotocraft

Maximum weight including Payload: Approx. 2.8 (less than 5 pounds)

Exemption No : 12142

Make: DJI

Model: Phantom 3 Professional

Type: Rotocraft

Maximum weight including Payload: Approx. 2.8 pounds (less than 5 pounds)

Exemption No: 12142

Make: SenseFly

Model: eBee

Type: Fixed Wing

Maximum weight including Payload: A pprox. 3.9 pounds (less than 5 pounds)

Exemption No.: 11263A

Make: SenseFly

Model: eXom

Type: Fixed Wing

Maximum weight including Payload: A pprox. 3.9 pounds (less than 5 pounds)

Exemption No.: 11263A

Make: SenseFly

Model: Ag

Type: Fixed Wing

Maxim um weight including Payload: A pprox. 3.9 pounds (less than 5 pounds)

Exemption No.: 11339Page 3 of 3 UAS, Inc. respectfully submits that good cause exists for granting the requested amendments e xpeditiously. UAS, Inc. asks only to amend its existing Exemption t o add additional micro UAS,

the DJI Phantom 3 and listed SenseFly “micro” unmanned aircraft, as that term is defined in the

Small UAS Proposed Rule. This request would not set any precedent, and any delay in acting on

the request would be detrimental to th e petitioner, as they intend to conduct operations using the

listed types of micro UAS as soon as the requested amendment is approved.

Appropriate manuals have been submitted separately and with confidentialty

.

Please do not hesitate to contact UAS, Inc. with any questions about this filing.

Sincerely,

Benjamin Z. Smith, President

827 W.Trindle Rd.

Mechanicsburg, PA 17055

Cell 717

- 278

- 7502

Office 717

- 691

- 8882

benjamin.smith@uavaviationservice s.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM POLYMER
GROUP, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                          11,527
<SECURITIES>                                    21,846
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,705)
<INVENTORY>                                    111,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               326,648
<PP&E>                                       1,030,757
<DEPRECIATION>                               (195,473)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,457,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          125,921
<BONDS>                                        594,804
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           320
<OTHER-SE>                                     237,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,457,918
<SALES>                                        231,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,952
<CGS>                                          180,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,137
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,137
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
IV 

House Calendar No. 37 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 36 

[Report No. 115–86] 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 

Soap Box Derby. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2017 

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BEYER, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mrs. COMSTOCK, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. DELANEY, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. RASKIN) 

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HCON 36 RH 

1 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

2 DERBY RACES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

4 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

5 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 

6 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

7 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 

8 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

9 June 17, 2017, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

10 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

11 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

12 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

14 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

15 Board, the event shall be— 

16 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

17 public; and 

18 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

19 Congress. 

20 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

21 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

22 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

23 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

24 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap25 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

26 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•HCON 36 RH 

1 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

2 for the event. 

3 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

4 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

5 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange6 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 

7 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

8 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce9 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

10 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise11 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

12 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

13 Grounds, with respect to the event. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

House Calendar No. 37 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 36 

[Report No. 115–86] 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

Greater Washington Soap Box Derby. 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 63 

Congratulating the New England Patriots on their victory in Super Bowl 

XLIX. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2015 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. REED, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mrs. 

SHAHEEN, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. COLLINS, 

and Mr. KING) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

FEBRUARY 4, 2015 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the New England Patriots on their victory 

in Super Bowl XLIX. 

Whereas on Sunday, February 1, 2015, the New England 

Patriots won Super Bowl XLIX with a score of 28 to 24, 

defeating the Seattle Seahawks in Glendale, Arizona; 

Whereas Malcolm Butler’s goal line interception with 20 seconds remaining in the game clinched the Super Bowl 

XLIX Championship for the New England Patriots; 

Whereas the Super Bowl XLIX victory is the fourth Super 

Bowl Championship for the New England Patriots; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 63 ATS 

Whereas quarterback Tom Brady broke, tied, or extended 9 

Super Bowl records in leading the New England Patriots 

to their fourth Super Bowl victory and was named the 

‘‘Super Bowl Most Valuable Player’’ for the third time; 

Whereas Head Coach Bill Belichick, Coordinators Matt Patricia and Josh McDaniels, and the staff of the New 

England Patriots brilliantly created successful game 

plans throughout the 2014 season; 

Whereas extraordinary efforts by players of the New England 

Patriots, including Tom Brady, Julian Edelman, Rob 

Gronkowski, Brandon LaFell, Danny Amendola, Shane 

Vereen, LeGarrette Blount, Darrelle Revis, Chandler 

Jones, Jamie Collins, Vince Wilfork, Rob Ninkovich, 

Devin McCourty, Don’ta Hightower, Sealver Siliga, Alan 

Branch, Ryan Allen, Stephen Gostkowski, Brandon 

Browner, Matthew Slater, and Malcolm Butler, significantly contributed to the Super Bowl XLIX victory; 

Whereas the offensive line of the New England Patriots was 

crucial to their victory in Super Bowl XLIX, and strong 

efforts by Nate Solder, Sebastian Vollmer, Bryan Stork, 

Ryan Wendell, Dan Connolly, and Cameron Fleming resulted in the New England Patriots conceding only one 

sack out of the 51 times quarterback Tom Brady 

dropped back to pass during Super Bowl XLIX; 

Whereas Robert Kraft, the owner of the New England Patriots, deserves great credit for his unwavering commitment 

and leadership, and for his gracious acknowledgment that 

the team’s Super Bowl Championship would not have 

been possible without the strong support of the millions 

of fans who comprise ‘‘Patriots Nation’’; and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 63 ATS 

Whereas all members of the New England Patriots ‘‘did their 

job’’ to help deliver a fourth Vince Lombardi Trophy to 

New England and are now ‘‘on to the White House’’ to 

celebrate their victory: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the New 

2 England Patriots on their dramatic Super Bowl XLIX vic3 tory. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# L_2008244EN.01S00301.xml

| 12.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 57 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Education relating to accountability 

and State plans under the Elementary and Secondary 

Education Act of 1965. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HJ 57 EH 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De2 partment of Education relating to accountability and 

3 State plans under the Elementary and Secondary Edu4 cation Act of 1965 (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 86076 (No5 vember 29, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or 

6 effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 7, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 57 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chap1965. Elementary and Secondary Education Act of ing to accountability and State plans under the submitted by the Department of Education relat- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
            --------------------------------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Aceto Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-38679, 333-90929, and 333-110653) on Form S-8 of Aceto Corporation of our
reports dated September 8, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Aceto Corporation as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2005, and
the related financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2005
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June
30, 2005, which reports appear in the June 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K
of Aceto Corporation.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Melville, New York
September 12, 2005
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 99 ) IV-C-6

5 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:56

AM Sheet 99 of 232

## $ A \ I *mtrj % UNITE

D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA

L PROTECTIO

N AGENC

Y \^r. '- WASHINGTON , D.C . 2046 0 F*\2
_

^ ^ t 0 FE B

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Charle s Ros e Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D . C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Rose : Thank yo u fo r you r lette r o f January26 , 1988 , whic h transmitte d letter s fro mfour o f you r constituent s expressing thei r view s o f EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar d refueling emissio n controls . Thes e letter s wil l be place d in the publi c docke t t o b e considere d along wit hman yother s we hav e receive d o n thi s importan t issue . Sincerel yyours ,
Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s cc : Docke t A-87-1 1
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 186 (Thursday, December 11, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10958]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 ORDERS FOR FRIDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2008, THROUGH FRIDAY, JANUARY 2, 2009

  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that when the 
Senate completes its business today, it stand in recess for pro forma 
sessions with no business conducted on the following days and times: 
Friday, December 12 at 10 a.m.; Tuesday, December 16 at 11 a.m.; 
Friday, December 19 at 10 a.m.; Tuesday, December 23 at 11 a.m.; 
Friday, December 26 at 11 a.m.; Tuesday, December 30 at 10:30 a.m.; and 
Friday, January 2 at 10 a.m.; that at the close of the pro forma 
session on January 2, the Senate stand adjourned sine die under the 
provisions of H. Con. Res. 440.
  Further, I ask unanimous consent that the record remain open for 
statements until 12 noon tomorrow.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1533

___________

Gregory Lew Neujahr, Citizen in *

Party, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Curtis H. Evans, County Judge, York *

County Courthouse, York, Nebraska; *

Alan G. Gless, District Judge, York *

County Courthouse, York, Nebraska; *

John C. Whitehead, District Judge, *

Columbus, Nebraska; Jon Zavadil, *

Platte County Sheriff and all others; * Appeal from the United States

John J. Kohl, Platte County Attorney * District Court for the 

and all others; Brian J. Wangler, * District of Nebraska

Columbus Police Department; William *

Gumm, Chief, Columbus Police * [UNPUBLISHED]

Department; Stan A. Emerson, *

Attorney, Sipple, Hansen, Emerson & *

Shumacker; Mid-East Nebraska Mental *

Health, Roberta Saunders, Clinical *

Director, and all others; Colin E. *

Alexander, Columbus Police *

Department; Roger W. Anderson, *

Sheriff, Seward County Sheriff&s Office *

and all others; Roger A. Jacobs, *

Coroner; Christopher A. Johnson, *

Attorney, Conway, Connally, Pauley, *

P.C.; Kevin Schlender, Attorney; *

James M. Dake, Attorney; Jo Peterson, *
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Nebraska, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable David L.

Piester, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska.

-2-

County Attorney, Seward County *

Courthouse; Debra M. Swanson, *

Attorney; Charles W. Campbell, York *

County Attorney; Daniel E. Pullen, *

Public Defender York County; Carlos *

Monzon, Attorney; Dale Radcliff, York *

County Sheriff; Dina Critel-Rathjie, *

Family Counseling Center; Attorney *

General, Don Stenberg; Bruce E. *

Stephens, Attorney; Richard T. *

Seckman, Colfax County Attorney; *

Unknown Doe, 1 to 100; *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: September 3, 1997

 Filed: September 25, 1997

___________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Lew Neujahr appeals from a final order of the United States District

Court for the District of Nebraska, dismissing his complaint with prejudice for failing 1

to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, and denying his motions for default

judgment and for summary judgment. We have carefully reviewed the record and

affirm on the basis of the district court&s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC DOCKET NO. 

XYZ CORP., 

 Respondent.

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Pursuant to Commission Rule 91, 29 C.F.R. 2200.91, Respondent, XYZ Corp. petitions the 

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission for review of the Administrative Law 

Judge’s decision in this case.

Statement Of Portions Of The Decision And Order To Which Exception Is Taken

1. XYZ Corp. takes exception to that portion of the Decision and Order wherein the 

Administrative Law Judge held XYZ Corp. in serious violation of the standard published at 29 

CFR 1926.28(a) as alleged in Serious Citation 1, Item 1, in finding that XYZ’s employee John 

Jones was exposed to the alleged violation. (Judge’s Decision at pp. 8 - 12.)

2. XYZ Corp. takes exception to that portion of the Decision and Order pertaining to Serious 

Citation 1, Item 1, wherein the Administrative Law Judge held that action of employee John 

Jones was not unpreventable employee misconduct. (Judge’s Decision at pp. 13 - 17.)

Statement Of Reasons For Which Exceptions Are Taken

1. In the Decision, the Administrative Law Judge failed to follow the test set forth for the Fifth 

Circuit’s Decision in Secretary of Labor v. RPQ Corp. for determining the existence of employee 

exposure. The testimony at transcript pages 25-45 clearly shows that John Jones was not in the 

zone of danger because he was on a work break and outside of the definition of the zone.

2. The evidence of record supports XYZ’s position that the actions taken by employee John 

Jones were unpreventable. The Commission has set forth the test for determining unpreventable 

employee misconduct at Secretary of Labor v. ROM Corp. The testimony of XYZ’s employees 

at transcript pp. 46-59 met all of the requirements of ROM Corp. to prove John Jones’s actions 

were unpreventable.
2

For the reasons stated herein, XYZ Corp. submits that the Occupational Safety and Health 

Review Commission should direct review of the Decision and Order of the Administrative Law 

Judge.

Respectfully submitted,

By ________________________

Attorney for

XYZ Corp.

123 Street

City, State Zip Code

Tel. No. (999) 999-9999
#### Nathaniel O. Tilton, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

1. The proper time to demand the right to poll the jury, is after the publication of the verdict and before the dispersion of the jury and recording of the verdict.

2. In criminal eases the privilege of polling the jury is a legal right in the defendant, and it is error to refuse it.

Criminal law. Practice in the Superior Court. Jury, Before Judge Bartlett. Chatham Superior Court. May Term, 1874.

Tilton was placed on trial for the offense of an assault and battery. He pleaded not guilty. The jury found to the contrary. After the verdict had been read, but before it had been recorded, in the presence of the jury, the defendant moved that they be polled. The' motion was overruled upon the ground that it came too late. The defendant moved for a. new trial on account of error in this decision. The motion, was overruled and the defendant excepted.

A. B. Smith, for plaintiff in error.

*479Albert R. Lamar, solicitor general, for the state.

McCay, Judge.

1. In the case of *Malone vs. The State,*49 *Georgia,*211, this court held, that the proper time to ask for leave to poll the jury, was after the verdict was read, and we adhere to that ruling. How is the prisoner to know whether lie desires to poll them until he knows what the verdict is ? It may be in his favor. The English practice was for the foreman to render the verdict *viva voee.*How could a juryman answer until the foreman had spoken ? The court refused to permit the jury to be polled because the demand came too late. This was error. But, it is said the leave to poll rests in the discretion of the court. It might be enough to say, that in this case the judge did not exercise his discretion, and that the prisoner has not, in fact, had even the opinion of the court that it was not wise to permit him to poll the jury. Had the judge not thought the time gone by, maybe he would have allowed it.

2. But we are of the opinion that in criminal cases the privilege of polling a jury is a legal right in the defendant, and does not depend on the discretion of the court. In an experience of thirty years at the bar, I have never known it denied to a prisoner demanding it, and my brethren, one of whom has an experience of nearly fifty years, say the same. And this seems to be the settled rule: 1. Wend., 91; 18 John., 187; 2 Alabama, 102; 2 Hale, P. C., 299, 300. The cases in this court, where the privilege has been said to depend on the discretion of the court, were all civil cases, and the court has distinctly confined the ruling to civil cases: 6 *Georgia,*464; 22 *Ibid.,*431 ; 41 *Ibid.,*465; 31 *Ibid.,*661.

Judgment reversed.