alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Annual Report of Aceto Corporation, a New York corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Albert L. Eilender, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ Albert L. Eilender


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


September 10, 2010
- Harassment Reporting & Investigation Procedures
- The Review Commission’s Policy
- Harassment
- Harassment Reporting Procedures
- Harassment Investigation Procedures
- Resources
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012

- NM

- 044

- AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate t o include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41301 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. LUCIANO SOLIS

- RUIZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16

- CR

- 623

- 1

Before REAVLEY, SOUTHWICK , and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Luciano Solis

- Ruiz appeals his conviction and sentence for importing five kilograms or more of cocaine into the United States. 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960(a)(1), (b)(1); 18 U.S.C. § 2 . His offense involved 28 kilograms of cocaine. The district court sentence d him at the bottom of the guideline range to 87 months of imprisonment

. Solis

- Ruiz challenges the denial of a mitigating role

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 6, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41301 Document: 00514144796 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2017No. 16

- 41301

2 reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, and he raises a foreclosed challenge to the sufficiency of the factual basis for his guilty ple a. Whether a defendant was a minor or minimal participant is a factual question that we review for clear error. United States v. Torres

- Hernandez , 843 F.3d 203, 207 (5th Cir. 2016). A district court need not expressly weigh each factor in d eciding wheth er to grant a mitigating role reduction. Id. at 209. Solis

- Ruiz decided to bring his common

- law wife and her 15

- year old son with him when he tried to bring the drugs into the United States. Thus, he did participate in planning the criminal activity to some degree, and he had some degree of discretion in performing the acts. See § 3B1.2, comment. (n.3(C)(ii), (iv)). T he district court’s finding that Solis

- Ruiz was not “substantially less culpable than the average participant in the criminal activity” w as plausible in light of the record as a whole. § 3B1.2, comment. (n.3(A)); see Torres

Hernandez , 843 F.3d at 207. Solis

- Ruiz argues that his factual basis was insufficient because it failed to establish that he knew the type and quantity of drugs that h e was importing. He seeks to reduce his conviction to importation of marijuana , which carries a five

- year maximum prison sentence under § 960(b)(4). As he acknowledges,

w e rejected the same argument under a nearly identical drug statute, 21 U.S.C. § 841. See United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3 d 303, 307

- 09 (5th Cir. 2009). AFFIRMED. Case: 16-41301 Document: 00514144796 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2017
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-1068

_____________________________

KEION MARQUISE JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

April 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Glenna Joyce Reeves, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Quentin 

Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
APPENDIX C

UAS #1: DJI – INSPIRE 1

See Appendix D for manual

UAS#2: CINESTAR 8

See Appendix e for manual*

*CineStar 8 is a customizable platform. We have included the manufacturer’s build manual for 

insight into the components. The UAS complies with all restrictions placed in this petition
UAS#3: DJI Phantom 3

See Appendix F for manual

UAS#4: DJI - S-1000

See Appendix G for manual 
UAS #5: DJI – S900

See Appendix H for manual

UAS #6: DJI – S800

See Appendix I for manual
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 650 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-308, K2025-306.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26581 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 435 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-298, K2025-296.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26565 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Stephen Brow*n v.*The Adm’r of Blake Brady, dec’d.

From Granville.

The act of 1800, respecting horáe-racing contracts, declares “ that all such contracts shall be reduced to writing’ and signed by the parties thereto, at the time they are made.” Under this act, a race may be made on one day, and the articles of the race and the bonds for the money bet, may be reduced to writing’ and signed by the parties on a subsequent day ; but the contract shall not be reduced to writing on one day, and signed by the parties on a subsequent day.

This was an action of debt, to recover money won on a horse-race; and the only question in th'e case was, whether as the race was made on one day, and the articles of the race, and the bonds for the monoy bet, were not reduced to writing and signed by the parties until the subsequent day, this was such *“*a reducing to writ- *“*ing, and such a signing as are required by the act of *te*Assembly.”

Tatiok, Chief-Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case turns upon the interpretation of certain words introduced into the act of 1800, concerning horse-racing. The words of the act are, “ that all horse-rac- “ ing contracts shall be reduced to writing, and signed by the parties thereto at the time they are made.” Do these words signify that a race shall not be made by parol on one day, and the writings executed on another? Or do they import that the contract shall not he written on one day, and signed by the parties on a subsequent, day ? That the latter is their true and rational construction, is evident from the context and the subsequent part of the clause; for a contract- cannot be signed until it is written, and therefore it is not made until it is reduced to writing. What passes between the parties in *118conversation before the contract is written, is carefully kept out of view by the( act itself, which excludes parol evidence to alter or explain ; but if the written contract js get a'side because the parties talked about the race before, or even made the race before, it must be done by parol evidence of that fact, which woukl be in the face of the act. No possible mischief can arise from the parties making a race at one time, if they afterwards deliberately put the terms on paper, and sign them at the Same time. But if there be any length of interval between the writing and signing of the contract, a man . might b¿ entrapped by hastily putting his name to a contract, the terms of which might have escaped his recollection. It was this inconvenience whicli the Legislature meant to guard against, and not to destroy a written contract, because it had been preceded by discussion and argument as to the *terms;*for such a method is calculated to prevent surprise and misapprehension. If, however, it could be shown by any induction, that the written articles do not form the contract contemplated Iby the Legislature, but that the race is the contract, what is the consequence ? It is declared to be void j but it was already a nullity, being extinguished by the subsequent specialty. So that whichever way it be taken, the party has a right to recover.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) 
ALBERTSON'S ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 30, 1997 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          90,865
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,201,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,475,923
<PP&E>                                       4,622,655
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,568,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,714,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,055,093
<BONDS>                                      1,051,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       250,690
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,996,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,714,633
<SALES>                                     13,776,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,776,678
<CGS>                                       10,211,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,211,348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                794,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                   301,068
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            493,779
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   493,779
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.96
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 150 (Thursday, August 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51537-51538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18525]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

2016 Meetings of the Equip 2020 Plenary and Working Groups; 
Supplemental Notice

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to scheduling conflicts, the FAA is rescheduling meeting 
dates that were published in the notice May 6, 2016, announcing the 
2016 meetings of the Equip 2020 Plenary and Working Groups.

DATES: Meeting 2 is rescheduled for Thursday, September 29, at 8:30 
a.m.; and meeting 3 is rescheduled for Tuesday, December 6, at 8:30 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: Meetings 2 and 3 will be held at Helicopter Association 
International, 1920 Ballenger Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elisabeth Auld, Program Support--FAA 
AVS Safety Technical Support Services Flight Technologies and 
Procedures Division; Email: Elisabeth.ctr.auld@faa.gov, Phone: 202-267-
4976. More information on ADS-B Out can be found at https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/equipadsb/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Meeting Procedures

    (a) Meeting attendance is by invitation only, and is generally 
limited to those that have participated in previous meetings or are a 
proxy from their organization.
    (b) All meetings start at 8:30 a.m. and conclude at approximately 
3:30 p.m. Doors open 30 minutes prior to the beginning of each meeting
    (c) Equip 2020 meetings generally start with 2 hours of Plenary 
briefings/discussion, 2-3 hours of working group meetings and 1-2 hours 
of Plenary for working group out briefs. Working groups are currently: 
Air Carrier Equipage, General Aviation Equipage

[[Page 51538]]

and Engagement, Benefits and ADS-B In and Installation and Approvals.
    (d) Contact Elisabeth Auld (elisabeth.ctr.auld@faa.gov) to request 
an invitation. There are no plans for telecon/webex access to these 
meetings.
    (e) The meetings will not be formally recorded. However, minutes 
are posted approximately 2-3 weeks after the meeting on the Equip 2020 
SharePoint site https://avssp.faa.gov/avs/afs400/EQUIP2020/SitePages/Equip2020.aspx.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 
10854, 24 FR 9665, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p.389.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 20, 2016.
Mark Steinbicker,
Assistant Manager, Flight Technologies and Procedures Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-18525 Filed 8-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 32


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Mymetics Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: April 28, 2006               /s/ Christian Rochet
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 28, 2006               /s/ Ernst Luebke
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Principal financial and Chief Financial
                                    Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as a separate
disclosure document.
Exhibit
31.3





CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David
A. Simon, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property Analysts Master
Limited Partnership (“NPAMLP”);





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
                  May 12, 2010By:
                  EBL&S Property Management Inc., Agent for
      NPAMLPBy:
                  /s/ David A. SimonName:
                  David
      A. SimonTitle:
                  Vice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer