# Official Journal C 89/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.089.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 89 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5419 March 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.089.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 89

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5419 March 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2011/C 089/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 80, 12.3.2011 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2011/C 089/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 80, 12.3.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2011/C 089/02 | Case C-449/09: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria OOD (The first subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Right of the proprietor of a mark to oppose the first placing into circulation within the EEA, without his consent, of goods bearing that mark) | 2 |
| 2011/C 089/03 | Case C-73/10 P: Order of the Court of 16 November 2010 — Internationale Fruchtimport Gesellschaft Weichert GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Commission Decision relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC — Action for annulment — Time-limit — Action brought out of time — Reasons justifying derogation from the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Right of access to a court — Principles of legality and proportionality — Appeal clearly unfounded) | 2 |
| 2011/C 089/04 | Case C-156/10 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 December 2010 — Karen Goncharov v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), DSB (Appeals — Community trade mark — Marks consisting of acronyms — Earlier trade mark DSB — Word sign ‘DSBW’ — Opposition proceedings — Relative ground for refusal — Examination of the likelihood of confusion — Visual similarity — Aural similarity — Inadmissibility — Assessment of the facts) | 3 |
| 2011/C 089/05 | Case C-204/10 P: Order of the Court of 23 November 2010 — Enercon GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Hasbro, Inc. (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Word mark ENERCON — Opposition of the proprietor of the word mark TRANSFORMERS ENERGON — Refusal to register — Likelihood of confusion) | 3 |
| 2011/C 089/06 | Case C-216/10 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2010 — Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Applus Servicios Technológicos SL (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 73, 74 and 79 — Figurative mark A+ — Opposition by the proprietor of the Community word mark AirPlus International — Opposition rejected) | 4 |
| 2011/C 089/07 | Case C-352/10: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo — Spain) — Angel Lorenzo González Alonso v Nationale Nederlanden Vida Cia De Seguros y Reaseguros SAE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Inadmissibility) | 4 |
| 2011/C 089/08 | Case C-583/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) made on 13 December 2010 — The United States of America v Christine Nolan | 4 |
| 2011/C 089/09 | Case C-586/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 15 December 2010 — Bianca Kücük v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5 |
| 2011/C 089/10 | Case C-588/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Polish Republic) lodged on 14 December 2010 — Minister Finansów v Kraft Foods Polska S.A. | 5 |
| 2011/C 089/11 | Case C-589/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Białymstoku (Polish Republic) lodged on 14 December 2010 — Janina Wencel v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Białymstoku | 5 |
| 2011/C 089/12 | Case C-591/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 14 December 2010 — Littlewoods Retail Ltd and others v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Revenue and Customs | 6 |
| 2011/C 089/13 | Case C-602/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Călărași (Romania) lodged on 21 December 2010 — SC Volksbank România SA v Autoritatea Națională pentru Protecția Consumatorilor — Comisariatul Județean pentru Protecția Consumatorilor Călărași (CJPC) | 7 |
| 2011/C 089/14 | Case C-604/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) made on 21 December 2010 — Football Dataco Limited, Football Association Premier League Ltd, Football League Limited, Scottish Premier League Limited, Scottish Football League, PA Sport UK Limited v Yahoo UK Limited, Stan James (Abingdon) Limited, Stan James PLC, Enetpulse APS | 7 |
| 2011/C 089/15 | Case C-607/10: Action brought on 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden | 8 |
| 2011/C 089/16 | Case C-609/10 P: Appeal brought on 23 December 2010 by Dieter C. Umbach against the judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 21 October 2010 in Case T-474/08 Dieter C. Umbach v European Commission | 8 |
| 2011/C 089/17 | Case C-616/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank ‘s Gravenhage (Netherlands) lodged on 29 December 2010 — Solvay S.A. v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe B.V. Honeywell Belgium N.V. Honeywell Europe N.V. | 9 |
| 2011/C 089/18 | Case C-629/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) made on 24 December 2010 — TUI Travel plc, British Airways plc, easyJet Airline Co. Ltd, International Air Transport Association, The Queen v Civil Aviation Authority | 10 |
| 2011/C 089/19 | Case C-630/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 24 December 2010 — University of Queensland, CSL Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks | 10 |
| 2011/C 089/20 | Case C-18/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 12 January 2011 — The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v Philips Electronics UK Ltd | 11 |
| 2011/C 089/21 | Case C-33/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Administrative Court (Finland) lodged on 21 January 2011 — A Oy | 11 |
| 2011/C 089/22 | Case C-36/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Second Chamber (Italy) lodged on 24 January 2011 — Pioneer HI-Bred Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali | 12 |
| 2011/C 089/23 | Case C-349/09: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 14 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland | 12 |
| 2011/C 089/24 | Case C-486/09: Order of the President of the Court of 17 November 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic | 12 |
| 2011/C 089/25 | Case C-80/10: Order of the President of the Court of 12 November 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic | 13 |
| 2011/C 089/26 | Case C-251/10 P: Order of the President of the Court of 9 November 2010 — KEK Diavlos v European Commission | 13 |
| 2011/C 089/27 | Case C-315/10: Order of the President of the Court of 16 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal)) — Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, CSN Cayman Ltd v Unifer Steel SL, BNP Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl (Portugal) SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI) | 13 |
| 2011/C 089/28 | Case C-353/10: Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic | 13 |
| 2011/C 089/29 | Case C-394/10: Order of the President of the Court of 17 November 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg | 13 |
| 2011/C 089/30 | Case C-398/10: Order of the President of the Court of 3 January 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic | 13 |
| | General Court |
| 2011/C 089/31 | Case T-33/05: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Cetarsa v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market-sharing — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Equal treatment — Principle of proportionality — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Cooperation) | 14 |
| 2011/C 089/32 | Case T-205/07: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Italy v Commission (Rules on the use of languages — Publication on EPSO’s website of a Call for expressions of interest to constitute a database of candidates to be recruited as contractual agents — Publication in three official languages — Articles 12 EC and 290 EC — Article 82 of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants — Regulation No 1) | 14 |
| 2011/C 089/33 | Case T-157/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2011 — Paroc v OHIM (INSULATE FOR LIFE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark INSULATE FOR LIFE — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Merely confirmatory decision — Partial inadmissibility) | 15 |
| 2011/C 089/34 | Case T-584/08: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Cantiere Navale De Poli v Commission (State aid — Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding — Alteration planned by the Italian authorities to an aid scheme previously authorised by the Commission — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market) | 15 |
| 2011/C 089/35 | Case T-3/09: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Italy v Commission (State aid — Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding — Alteration planned by the Italian authorities to an aid scheme previously authorised by the Commission — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market) | 15 |
| 2011/C 089/36 | Case T-194/09: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2011 — Lan Airlines v OHIM — Air Nostrum (LÍNEAS AÉREAS Del MEDITERRÁNEO LAM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark LINEAS AEREAS DEL MEDITERRANEO LAM — Earlier Community word and figurative marks LAN — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 16 |
| 2011/C 089/37 | Case T-222/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2011 — Ineos Healthcare v OHIM — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (ALPHAREN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ALPHAREN — Earlier national word marks ALPHA D3 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Examination of the facts of its own motion — Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 16 |
| 2011/C 089/38 | Case T-299/09 and T-300/09: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Gühring v OHIM (Combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey and combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Examination of the facts of the Court’s own motion — Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) | 16 |
| 2011/C 089/39 | Case T-136/10: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2011 — M v EMA (Action for damages — Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Referral back to the Civil Service Tribunal) | 17 |
| 2011/C 089/40 | Case T-587/10: Action brought on 29 December 2010 — Interspeed v Commission | 17 |
| 2011/C 089/41 | Case T-588/10: Action brought on 29 December 2010 — Hellenic Republic v Commission | 18 |
| 2011/C 089/42 | Case T-2/11: Action brought on 4 January 2011 — Portugal v Commission | 20 |
| 2011/C 089/43 | Case T-43/11: Action brought on 25 January 2011 — Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo PTE v Commission | 21 |
| 2011/C 089/44 | Case T-50/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Fraas v OHIM (Dark grey, light grey, black, beige, dark red and light red coloured checked pattern) | 22 |
| 2011/C 089/45 | Case T-56/11: Action brought on 25 January 2011 — SAS Cargo Group and Others v Commission | 23 |
| 2011/C 089/46 | Case T-58/11 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2011 by Michel Nolin against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 1 December 2010 in Case F-82/09, Nolin v Commission | 23 |
| 2011/C 089/47 | Case T-59/11: Action brought on 31 January 2011 — ISOTIS v Commission | 24 |
| 2011/C 089/48 | Case T-61/11: Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Vermop Salmon v OHIM — Leifheit (Clean Twist) | 25 |
| 2011/C 089/49 | Case T-64/11: Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Run2Day Franchise v OHIM — Runners Point (Run2) | 25 |
| 2011/C 089/50 | Case T-66/11: Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Present Service Ullrich v OHIM — Punt-Nou (babilu) | 26 |
| 2011/C 089/51 | Case T-69/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Truvo Belgium v OHIM — AOL (Truvo) | 26 |
| 2011/C 089/52 | Case T-76/11: Action brought on 2 February 2011 — Spain v Commission | 27 |
| 2011/C 089/53 | Case T-416/06: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2011 — Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe v Commission | 27 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2011/C 089/54 | Case F-60/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 February 2011 — Chiavegato v Commission | 28 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2011/C 089/02

Case C-449/09: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria OOD (The first subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Right of the proprietor of a mark to oppose the first placing into circulation within the EEA, without his consent, of goods bearing that mark)

2

2011/C 089/03

Case C-73/10 P: Order of the Court of 16 November 2010 — Internationale Fruchtimport Gesellschaft Weichert GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Commission Decision relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC — Action for annulment — Time-limit — Action brought out of time — Reasons justifying derogation from the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Right of access to a court — Principles of legality and proportionality — Appeal clearly unfounded)

2

2011/C 089/04

Case C-156/10 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 December 2010 — Karen Goncharov v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), DSB (Appeals — Community trade mark — Marks consisting of acronyms — Earlier trade mark DSB — Word sign ‘DSBW’ — Opposition proceedings — Relative ground for refusal — Examination of the likelihood of confusion — Visual similarity — Aural similarity — Inadmissibility — Assessment of the facts)

3

2011/C 089/05

Case C-204/10 P: Order of the Court of 23 November 2010 — Enercon GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Hasbro, Inc. (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Word mark ENERCON — Opposition of the proprietor of the word mark TRANSFORMERS ENERGON — Refusal to register — Likelihood of confusion)

3

2011/C 089/06

Case C-216/10 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2010 — Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Applus Servicios Technológicos SL (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 73, 74 and 79 — Figurative mark A+ — Opposition by the proprietor of the Community word mark AirPlus International — Opposition rejected)

4

2011/C 089/07

Case C-352/10: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo — Spain) — Angel Lorenzo González Alonso v Nationale Nederlanden Vida Cia De Seguros y Reaseguros SAE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Inadmissibility)

4

2011/C 089/08

Case C-583/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) made on 13 December 2010 — The United States of America v Christine Nolan

4

2011/C 089/09

Case C-586/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 15 December 2010 — Bianca Kücük v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

5

2011/C 089/10

Case C-588/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Polish Republic) lodged on 14 December 2010 — Minister Finansów v Kraft Foods Polska S.A.

5

2011/C 089/11

Case C-589/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Białymstoku (Polish Republic) lodged on 14 December 2010 — Janina Wencel v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Białymstoku

5

2011/C 089/12

Case C-591/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 14 December 2010 — Littlewoods Retail Ltd and others v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Revenue and Customs

6

2011/C 089/13

Case C-602/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Călărași (Romania) lodged on 21 December 2010 — SC Volksbank România SA v Autoritatea Națională pentru Protecția Consumatorilor — Comisariatul Județean pentru Protecția Consumatorilor Călărași (CJPC)

7

2011/C 089/14

Case C-604/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) made on 21 December 2010 — Football Dataco Limited, Football Association Premier League Ltd, Football League Limited, Scottish Premier League Limited, Scottish Football League, PA Sport UK Limited v Yahoo UK Limited, Stan James (Abingdon) Limited, Stan James PLC, Enetpulse APS

7

2011/C 089/15

Case C-607/10: Action brought on 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden

8

2011/C 089/16

Case C-609/10 P: Appeal brought on 23 December 2010 by Dieter C. Umbach against the judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 21 October 2010 in Case T-474/08 Dieter C. Umbach v European Commission

8

2011/C 089/17

Case C-616/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank ‘s Gravenhage (Netherlands) lodged on 29 December 2010 — Solvay S.A. v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe B.V. Honeywell Belgium N.V. Honeywell Europe N.V.

9

2011/C 089/18

Case C-629/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) made on 24 December 2010 — TUI Travel plc, British Airways plc, easyJet Airline Co. Ltd, International Air Transport Association, The Queen v Civil Aviation Authority

10

2011/C 089/19

Case C-630/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 24 December 2010 — University of Queensland, CSL Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks

10

2011/C 089/20

Case C-18/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 12 January 2011 — The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v Philips Electronics UK Ltd

11

2011/C 089/21

Case C-33/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Administrative Court (Finland) lodged on 21 January 2011 — A Oy

11

2011/C 089/22

Case C-36/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Second Chamber (Italy) lodged on 24 January 2011 — Pioneer HI-Bred Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali

12

2011/C 089/23

Case C-349/09: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 14 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

12

2011/C 089/24

Case C-486/09: Order of the President of the Court of 17 November 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic

12

2011/C 089/25

Case C-80/10: Order of the President of the Court of 12 November 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

13

2011/C 089/26

Case C-251/10 P: Order of the President of the Court of 9 November 2010 — KEK Diavlos v European Commission

13

2011/C 089/27

Case C-315/10: Order of the President of the Court of 16 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal)) — Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, CSN Cayman Ltd v Unifer Steel SL, BNP Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl (Portugal) SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI)

13

2011/C 089/28

Case C-353/10: Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

13

2011/C 089/29

Case C-394/10: Order of the President of the Court of 17 November 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

13

2011/C 089/30

Case C-398/10: Order of the President of the Court of 3 January 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

13

General Court

2011/C 089/31

Case T-33/05: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Cetarsa v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market-sharing — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Equal treatment — Principle of proportionality — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Cooperation)

14

2011/C 089/32

Case T-205/07: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Italy v Commission (Rules on the use of languages — Publication on EPSO’s website of a Call for expressions of interest to constitute a database of candidates to be recruited as contractual agents — Publication in three official languages — Articles 12 EC and 290 EC — Article 82 of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants — Regulation No 1)

14

2011/C 089/33

Case T-157/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2011 — Paroc v OHIM (INSULATE FOR LIFE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark INSULATE FOR LIFE — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Merely confirmatory decision — Partial inadmissibility)

15

2011/C 089/34

Case T-584/08: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Cantiere Navale De Poli v Commission (State aid — Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding — Alteration planned by the Italian authorities to an aid scheme previously authorised by the Commission — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market)

15

2011/C 089/35

Case T-3/09: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Italy v Commission (State aid — Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding — Alteration planned by the Italian authorities to an aid scheme previously authorised by the Commission — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market)

15

2011/C 089/36

Case T-194/09: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2011 — Lan Airlines v OHIM — Air Nostrum (LÍNEAS AÉREAS Del MEDITERRÁNEO LAM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark LINEAS AEREAS DEL MEDITERRANEO LAM — Earlier Community word and figurative marks LAN — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

16

2011/C 089/37

Case T-222/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2011 — Ineos Healthcare v OHIM — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (ALPHAREN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ALPHAREN — Earlier national word marks ALPHA D3 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Examination of the facts of its own motion — Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009))

16

2011/C 089/38

Case T-299/09 and T-300/09: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Gühring v OHIM (Combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey and combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Examination of the facts of the Court’s own motion — Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

16

2011/C 089/39

Case T-136/10: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2011 — M v EMA (Action for damages — Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Referral back to the Civil Service Tribunal)

17

2011/C 089/40

Case T-587/10: Action brought on 29 December 2010 — Interspeed v Commission

17

2011/C 089/41

Case T-588/10: Action brought on 29 December 2010 — Hellenic Republic v Commission

18

2011/C 089/42

Case T-2/11: Action brought on 4 January 2011 — Portugal v Commission

20

2011/C 089/43

Case T-43/11: Action brought on 25 January 2011 — Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo PTE v Commission

21

2011/C 089/44

Case T-50/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Fraas v OHIM (Dark grey, light grey, black, beige, dark red and light red coloured checked pattern)

22

2011/C 089/45

Case T-56/11: Action brought on 25 January 2011 — SAS Cargo Group and Others v Commission

23

2011/C 089/46

Case T-58/11 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2011 by Michel Nolin against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 1 December 2010 in Case F-82/09, Nolin v Commission

23

2011/C 089/47

Case T-59/11: Action brought on 31 January 2011 — ISOTIS v Commission

24

2011/C 089/48

Case T-61/11: Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Vermop Salmon v OHIM — Leifheit (Clean Twist)

25

2011/C 089/49

Case T-64/11: Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Run2Day Franchise v OHIM — Runners Point (Run2)

25

2011/C 089/50

Case T-66/11: Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Present Service Ullrich v OHIM — Punt-Nou (babilu)

26

2011/C 089/51

Case T-69/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Truvo Belgium v OHIM — AOL (Truvo)

26

2011/C 089/52

Case T-76/11: Action brought on 2 February 2011 — Spain v Commission

27

2011/C 089/53

Case T-416/06: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2011 — Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe v Commission

27

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2011/C 089/54

Case F-60/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 February 2011 — Chiavegato v Commission

28

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN