alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 91472-91473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26901]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12588]

Notice of Determinations; Additional Culturally Significant 
Objects Being Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Auschwitz-
Birkenau Artifacts'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: On June 19, 2019, notice was published in the Federal Register 
of determinations pertaining to certain objects to be included in an 
exhibition entitled ``Auschwitz-Birkenau Artifacts.'' Notice is hereby 
given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain 
additional objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement 
with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the 
aforesaid exhibition at the Holocaust Museum LA, in Los Angeles, 
California, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign

[[Page 91473]]

Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 
22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of 
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, 
and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021. The notice of 
determinations published on June 19, 2019, appears at 84 FR 28610.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-26901 Filed 11-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Total hours worked by all employees last year

Sign here

Knowingly falsifying this document may result in a fine.

I certify that I have examined this document and that to the best of 

my knowledge the entries are true, accurate, and complete.

Company executive Title

Phone Date

Annual average number of employees

Employment information (If you don't have these figures, see the 

Worksheet on the next page to estimate.)

North American Industrial Classification (NAICS), if known (e.g., 336212)

Industry description (e.g., Manufacture of motor truck trailers)

Zip

Establishment information

Your establishment name

Street

City State

OSHA’s Form 300A (Rev. 04/2004)

Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses

Year 20 

U.S. Department of Labor

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

All establishments covered by Part 1904 must complete this Summary page, even if no work-related injuries or illnesses occurred during the year. 

Remember to review the Log to verify that the entries are complete and accurate before completing this summary.

Using the Log, count the individual entries you made for each category. Then write the totals below, making sure you've added the entries from 

every page of the Log. If you had no cases, write “0.”

Employees, former employees, and their representatives have the right to review the OSHA Form 300 in its entirety. They also have limited access 

to the OSHA Form 301 or its equivalent. See 29 CFR Part 1904.35, in OSHA’s recordkeeping rule, for further details on the access provisions for 

these forms.

Form approved OMB no. 1218-0176 

Total number of 

deaths

Total number of 

cases with days 

away from work

Total number of cases 

with job transfer or 

restriction

Total number of 

other recordable

cases

(G) (H) (I) (J)

Total number of days 

away from work

Total number of days of 

job transfer or restriction

(K) (L)

Total number of . . .

(M)

(1) Injuries

(2) Skin disorders

(3) Respiratory conditions

(4) Poisonings

(5) Hearing loss

(6) All other illnesses

Post this Summary page from February 1 to April 30 of the year following the year covered by the form.

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 58 minutes per response, including time to review the instructions, search and gather the data needed, and

complete and review the collection of information. Persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. If you have any

comments about these estimates or any other aspects of this data collection, contact: US Department of Labor, OSHA Office of Statistical Analysis, Room N-3644, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20210. Do not send the completed forms to this office.

Number of Days

Number of Cases

Injury and Illness Types

Note: You can type input into this form and save it.

Because the forms in this recordkeeping package are “fillable/writable”

PDF documents, you can type into the input form fields and 

then save your inputs using the free Adobe PDF Reader. 

OSH Manager
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 113 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 113

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public

              

 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 16, 2018, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 113

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
TRANSAMERICAN REFINING CORPORATION'S UNAUDITIED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT JULY
31, 1998 AND THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JULY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          46,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     32,033
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,361
<PP&E>                                       1,328,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,431,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,883
<BONDS>                                      1,050,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     264,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,431,718
<SALES>                                          8,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,652
<CGS>                                            7,819
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,372)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,372)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,294)
<CHANGES>                                        2,674    
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,992)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.73)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014030EN.01001202.xml

| 1.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/12

---

Corrigendum to Call for proposals 2013 — EAC/S11/13 — Erasmus+ programme

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 362 of 12 December 2013
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 362 of 12 December 2013

2014/C 30/08

On page 62, the title of the call should read as follows:

on page 64, point ‘4. Award criteria’ should read as follows:

‘Applications for the actions included in this call for proposals will be assessed against all or part of the following criteria (except applications for funding of higher education students and staff mobility projects where the quality was already assessed at the level of the accreditation of the higher education institution or consortium):

| — | relevance of the project, |
| --- | --- |

—

relevance of the project,

| — | quality of the project design and implementation, |
| --- | --- |

—

quality of the project design and implementation,

| — | quality of the project team and the cooperation arrangements, |
| --- | --- |

—

quality of the project team and the cooperation arrangements,

| — | impact and dissemination. |
| --- | --- |

—

impact and dissemination.

Please refer to the Erasmus+ Programme Guide for further details on how the award criteria are applied to the specific actions.’.

---
From: "Cain, Randy D." <RCAIN2@alleghenyenergy.com> To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Cannon, William E." <WCA NNON@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Lapcevic, Joseph P." <JLAPCEV@alleghenyene rgy.com> Date: 07/06/2010 11:21 AM Subject: Steam Electric Power Generating ICR - Albright Power Station (00066) - Extension Request

July 6, 2010

Jezebele Alicea USEPA 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 4303TWashington, DC 20460 RE: Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines Allegheny Energy Albright Power Station – Plant ID 00066

Dear Ms. Alicea: Allegheny Energy’s Albright Power Station received the EPA Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines on Friday, June 18, 2010. We have reviewed the ICR questionnaire (Version 1) and believe its breadth and depth of information require more time to complete. In accord with the instructions on the EPA cover letter, Allegheny Energy respectf ully requests an additional 30 days to provide responses. There are two reasons for this time extension request. First, Allegheny Energy initiated a merger with FirstEnergy of Akron, Ohio, on February 11, 2010. In order to support the merger and thoroughly explore the resulting synergies of the combined company numerous employees of Allegheny Energy were sent to Akron at the end of May for approximately a three month period. This has decreased an already lean staff to continue conducting business as usual in addition to responding to such inquiries as this ICR. Compounding the problem is potential attrition of Allegheny En ergy Corporate Services staff in anticipation of job loss associated with the combination of the two companies. Already, one key engineer that would have extensively worked on the ICR as left the company. In addition, the unprecedented issuance of a number of new regulatory proposals (e.g. CCRs, GHG MRR, GHG Ta iloring Rule), al ong with other ICRs (i.e. HAPs MACT and PCB) by EPA and state regulatory agencies has also added to the difficulty to provide thorough and meaningful responses by our limited staff. An additional 30 days would allow for Allegheny Energy and power station staffs to not only gather the necessary data required to support the ICR, but also would provide time to review the submittal for completeness and consistency. This additional 30 days in the response time will most likely lessen the need for further inquiry by EPA’s contractor (ERG) for purpose of explanation of the responses provided and possibly supplemental information request to aide clarification.Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, Randy Cain

Randy Cain Environmental Affairs Manager Allegheny Energy 800 Cabin Hill Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 phone: 724-838-6004 fax: 724-830-7711 e-mail: rcain2@alleghenyenergy.com
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for June 2023

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month							14

2. Cases Added to Docket									 3

Shawn D. Purvis d/b/a/ Purvis Home Improvement Co., Inc. (an individual) 
and Purvis Home Improvement Co., Inc. (in the alternative)
Nos. 19-1054, 19-1056, and 19-1905
Directed for Review on June 29, 2023


3. Cases Subtracted from Docket								 0
												

			 
4. Total Cases Pending End of Month							17
Bruce: 

It is OK to use a colorimetric endpoint determination in place of a pH meter for OTM-028. The intent of the 

method was to neutralize the acids but not add more ammonium hydroxide that was necessary for neutrality. The 

use of phenolphthalein or other indicator of reaching a pH of 7.0 achieves that goal. I don't know how much 

residue there may be in two or three drops of phenolphthalein but even at 5mg/100ml three drops would not be 

weighable with a 4 place balance. 

_________________________________

Ron Myers 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Sector Policy and Programs Division 

Monitoring Policy Group, D243-05 

RTP NC 27711 

Tel. 919.541.5407 

Fax 919.541.1039 

E-mail myers.ron@epa.gov 

Bruce, 

First to clarify, you are talking about OTM-028 rather than CTM-028, right (your third paragraph had me confused 

at first)? 

I have cc:ed Ron Myers and Jason DeWees who are much more knowledgeable on OTM-028 than me. 

Hopefully, they will have a quick answer for you, 

Robin 

Robin, 

From: Robin Segall/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "J. Bruce Nemet" <Resolute1@charterinternet.com>

Cc: Ron Myers/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jason Dewees/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/11/2010 12:40 PM

Subject: Re: OTM-028 alternative procedure for pH determination

From: "J. Bruce Nemet" <Resolute1@charterinternet.com>

To: Robin Segall/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/10/2010 09:16 AM

Subject: OTM-028 alternative procedure for pH determination

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C765394Do... 8/26/2010
I own and operate an air quality testing laboratory providing analytical services under the guidelines of 

CAA. I also, incidentally, serve as our Quality Assurance officer. We are currently utilizing several 

analytical and/or preparatory procedures that are either in conflict or not specifially addressed in the 

respective EPA methods. 

In each case I prefer the use of the alternative procedures to those specified in their respective methods 

because of an increased accuracy or reliability and not as a cost-savings means. (The following method 

falls under your domain I believe.) Can you provide me with some feedback on approval (or 

disapproval) of the following procedure. 

EPA Conditional Test Method 028 (CTM-028) specifically requires the use of a pH meter to titrate 

resuspended aqueous samples to a pH 7 (sec. 11.2.2.4). Although our lab is equipped with a pH meter I 

prefer the analyst to use a colorimetric endpoint determination (ie., phenolphthalein) in place of the 

meter. It is much more reliable and doesn't require calibration. A meter, although calibrated, may have 

"response drift" since its last calibration - even in the course of a few hours! Phenolphthalein is 

consistently reliable and never needs calibration. I would like approval from the EPA for its use in place 

of a meter for this specific procedure. 

 

Thank you. 

I can also be contacted by phone at (919) 774-5557. 

Bruce Nemet 

QA Officer 

Resolution Analytics, Inc. 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C765394Do... 8/26/2010
**Exhibit 32.1.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert B. Barnhill, Jr., Chief ExecutiveOfficer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated (the “Company”), certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

# 1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarter ended December 27, 2009 (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

#  

# 2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

#  

#  

| Date:  February 10, 2010 | /s/  Robert B. Barnhill, Jr. |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                          | Robert B. Barnhill, Jr.      |

##  

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 32


                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Roger S. Marcus, Chief Executive Officer, and Howard N. Feist III, Chief
Financial Officer, of American Biltrite Inc. ("the Company"), each hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      1.    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
            December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: March 27, 2007                 /s/ Roger S. Marcus
      --------------                 --------------------------------------
                                     Roger S. Marcus, Chairman of the Board,
                                     Chief Executive Officer and Director


                                     /s/ Howard N. Feist III
                                     -----------------------
                                     Howard N. Feist III, Vice President Finance
                                     and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Bestway, Inc.
    
    Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF BESTWAY, INC. This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended July 31,
2004 of Bestway, Inc. (the Issuer). I, Beth A. Durrett, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that
to the best of my knowledge:  (i)
    
    the Form 10-K fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer. Dated: October 25, 2004/s/ Beth A. DurrettBeth A. DurrettSubscribed and sworn to before me
this 25 day of October 2004./s/ Jeanne A. Andress

Name: Jeanne A. AndressTitle: Notary PublicMy commission expires: 4/13/2006