alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 0189 V

UNPUBLISHED

RINA SCHNAUFER

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: June 14, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Hepatitis A (Hep A)

Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to
Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Matthew F. Belanger

, Faraci Lang , LLP

, Rochester

, NY , for P etitioner.

Lynn Christina Schlie , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On February 24, 2020

, Rina Schnaufer filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoul der injury related to vaccine administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of a Hepatitis A ( “ Hep A ” ) vaccine that was

administered to her on August 24, 2017 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 14, 2 021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that

P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent states that “ [P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table ( “ Table ” ) and the Q ualifications and Aids to I nterpretation ( “ QAI ” )

. ”

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012 ).2

Id. at 9

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 4, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-15422 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 5:11-cr-00024-MTT-CHW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES POOLE, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Georgia

 ________________________

(May 4, 2012)

Before CARNES, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
John Philip Fox, appointed counsel for Charles Poole in this appeal, has

moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Poole’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED. 

2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2327]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     HONORING BRANDEN DEMAR THOELE

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. SAM GRAVES

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, November 20, 2008

  Mr. GRAVES. Madam Speaker, I proudly pause to recognize Branden Demar 
Thoele of Kansas City, Missouri. Branden is a very special young man 
who has exemplified the finest qualities of citizenship and leadership 
by taking an active part in the Boy Scouts of America, Troop 1378, and 
earning the most prestigious award of Eagle Scout.
  Branden has been very active with his troop, participating in many 
Scout activities. Over the many years Branden has been involved with 
Scouting, he has not only earned numerous merit badges, but also the 
respect of his family, peers, and community.
  Madam Speaker, I proudly ask you to join me in commending Branden 
Demar Thoele for his accomplishments with the Boy Scouts of America and 
for his efforts put forth in achieving the highest distinction of Eagle 
Scout.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H91]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            PETITIONS, ETC.

  Under clause 3 of rule XII,

       2. The SPEAKER presented a petition of the City of Margate, 
     Florida, relative to Resolution No. 11-354 objecting to the 
     state requiring present users of the Margate utility system 
     to pay for all alternative water sources without additional 
     funding or grants from the State of Florida and urging the 
     State of Florida to either provide additional revenue sources 
     or withdraw the requirement that utility systems find 
     alternative water sources; and providing for an effective 
     date; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
     Resources.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                        DIGITAL DESCRIPTOR SYSTEMS, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Anthony  Shupin,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  Acting Chief Financial
Officer and Director of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Digital  Descriptor  Systems,  Inc.  and will be retained by Digital
Descriptor Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

Date: February 11, 2004



/s/ Anthony Shupin
-------------------------------------------
Anthony Shupin
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Acting Chief Financial Officer and Director



                                      -23-
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCOS VILLAFUERTE ROCHA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72608

Agency No. A079-359-493

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Marcos Villafuerte Rocha, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review de novo questions of law, and review for substantial evidence 

FILED

DEC 21 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-72608

the agency’s factual findings. Aguilar Gonzalez v. Mukasey, 534 F.3d 1204, 1208

(9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Villafuerte Rocha

was inadmissable for alien smuggling where the record contains Villafuerte

Rocha’s sworn statement admitting that he knew the passengers in his car had no

legal documentation to enter the United States, and that he had participated in

making arrangements to pick them up in Mexico. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i);

Urzua Covarrubias v. Gonzales, 487 F.3d 742, 748-49 (9th Cir. 2007).

We reject Villafuerte Rocha’s due process claim regarding the manner in

which the immigration officials obtained his statement. See Cuevas-Ortega v. INS,

588 F.2d 1274, 1278 (9th Cir. 1979) (no due process violation because “the bare

assertion that a statement is involuntary is insufficient” to prove coercion).

We lack jurisdiction to review Villafuerte Rocha’s remaining contentions

because he failed to exhaust them before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358

F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2012-1107 (2011-NM-216-AD)
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on June 30, 2020
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
15-1121
Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.
06/30/16
DFR
11/09/16
Closed

2
14-1268
Dover High Performance Plastics
07/19/16
DFR
11/01/16
Closed

 3
16-0803
The Lane Construction Corporation 
05/23/17
DFR
09/14/17
Closed

 4
16-1167
Aerospace Testing Alliance
08/22/17
DFR
11/20/17
Closed

 5
15-1069
Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc.
10/27/17
DFR
11/13/17
   Closed

 6
16-0940
Angel Brothers Enterprises, Ltd.
11/17/17
DFR
12/15/17
Closed

 7
17-0190
Shelly & Sands, Inc.
05/02/18
DFR
05/10/18
Closed

 8
15-1574
MasTec North America dba MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.
06/20/18
DFR
07/10/18
Closed

 9
17-0949
Walmart, Inc.
07/12/18
DFR
08/09/18
   Closed

10
17-1214
Mansfield Industrial, Inc.
11/23/18
DFR
01/03/19
Closed

11
17-0483
Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
11/28/18
DFR
12/19/18
Closed

12
16-1628
Schaad Detective Agency, Inc.
12/18/18
DFR
01/07/19
Closed

13
17-1174
Wayne Farms, LLC
03/01/19
DFR
03/21/19
Closed

14
17-2144
Tampa Electric Co.
04/09/19
DFR
04/23/19
Closed

15
18-0034
Armstrong Utilities, Inc. d/b/a Armstrong Cable Services
10/15/19
DFR
10/24/19
Closed

16
17-0138
Home Rubber Company, LP
10/22/19
DFR
  11/04/19
Closed

17
18-0970
FreightCar America, Inc.
10/28/19
DFR
11/04/19
Closed

18
18-0758
RoadSafe Traffic Systems, Inc.
10/30/19
DFR
11/01/19
Closed

19
17-1894
Maxim Crane Works
02/06/20
DFR
02/14/20
Closed

20
17-0737
UHS of Westwood Pembroke, Inc.
UHS of Delaware, Inc.
03/19/20
DFR
03/25/20
Closed

21
19-0593
StormForce of Jacksonville, LLC
06/04/20
DFR



22
18-0188
U.S. Postal Service
06/17/20
DFR


Laihow
 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
# Official Journal C 31/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 31 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6330 January 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 31

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6330 January 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 31/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9688 — Cinvend/Astorg/LGC Science Group) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 31/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9688 — Cinvend/Astorg/LGC Science Group) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 31/02 | Euro exchange rates — 29 January 2020 | 2 |
| 2020/C 31/03 | Public Holidays 2020 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 31/02

Euro exchange rates — 29 January 2020

2

2020/C 31/03

Public Holidays 2020

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 31/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9680 — La Voix Du Nord/SIM/Mediacontact/Roof Media) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2020/C 31/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9709 — ENI/CDP Equity /GreenIT) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2020/C 31/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9587 — ENGIE/EDP Renovaveis/EDPR Offshore España) (
  1
  ) | 7 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 31/07 | Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 31/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9680 — La Voix Du Nord/SIM/Mediacontact/Roof Media) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

2020/C 31/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9709 — ENI/CDP Equity /GreenIT) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

2020/C 31/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9587 — ENGIE/EDP Renovaveis/EDPR Offshore España) (
  1
  )

1

7

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 31/07

Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 398/2017

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 398 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6024 November 2017 |

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 398

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6024 November 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II	Information | |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES | |
| | European Commission | |
| 2017/C 398/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8656 — Mitsui/Sime Darby/JV) (Text with EEA relevance.
  ) | 1 |
| | | |
| 2017/C 398/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8518 — MDP/HPS/Nevada/Towergate) (Text with EEA relevance.
  ) | 1 |
| | | |
| |
| | IV	Notices | |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES | |
| | European Commission | |
| 2017/C 398/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | | |
| |
| | V	Announcements | |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY | |
| | European Commission | |
| 2017/C 398/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8708 — Société Générale/BNP Paribas/Powerhouse France) — Candidate case for
  simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance.
  ) | 3 |
| | | |

Notice No

Contents

page

II	Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 398/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8656 — Mitsui/Sime Darby/JV) (Text with EEA relevance.
  )

1

2017/C 398/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8518 — MDP/HPS/Nevada/Towergate) (Text with EEA relevance.
  )

1

---

IV	Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 398/03

Euro exchange rates

2

---

V	Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2017/C 398/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8708 — Société Générale/BNP Paribas/Powerhouse France) — Candidate case for
  simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance.
  )

3

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D18]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
NOMINATION
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions: Committee 
concluded a hearing to examine the nomination of Hilda L. Solis, to be 
Secretary of Labor, after the nominee, who was introduced by Senators 
Feinstein and Boxer, testified and answered questions in her own 
behalf.
```
## Judge John H. Schumacher Joins Review Commission

**JUDGE JOHN H. SCHUMACHER JOINS REVIEW COMMISSION**

Chairman W. Scott Railton recently announced that a new administrative law judge, John H. Schumacher, has joined the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. “Judge Schumacher, with his breadth of experience, is a welcome addition to our judicial ranks,” Chairman Railton remarked. 

Judge Schumacher will work out of the Washington, D.C. headquarters of the Review Commission. The Review Commission is an independent adjudicatory agency that hears and decides disputes involving allegations that job safety or health standards were violated. Created by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, the Review Commission’s cases emanate from contested workplace inspections conducted by an agency of the U.S. Department of Labor, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Judge Schumacher has served as a Social Security Administration Administrative Law Judge, as a Senior Trial Attorney with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, specializing in civil litigation, and as a Judge Advocate with the United States Air Force. He joined the U.S. Air Force Reserves after separating from active duty in 1999. He retired from the reserves as a Lieutenant Colonel in 2004. The judge is the author of *Mumbo Jumbo*, a light-hearted lampoon of the legal profession.

Judge Schumacher received his J.D. from the University of Nebraska, a Master of Business Administration from the University of Phoenix and his undergraduate degree from Columbia College in Denver, Colorado. He and his wife, the parents of two, reside in Virginia.
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We have issued our report dated March 14, 2005,accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedulesincorporated in the annual Report of Allied Defense Group onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reportin the Registration Statements of Allied Defense Group onForms S-3 (File No. 33-101724, effectiveFebruary 7, 2003) and S-8 (File No. 2-96771, effectiveApril 22, 1985, File No. 33-25677 effectiveDecember 14, 1988, File No. 33-41422 effectiveJune 27, 1992, File No. 33-45303 effectiveJanuary 24, 1993, File No. 33-57170 effectiveJanuary 19, 1994, and File No. 33-57172 effectiveJanuary 19, 1994 and Form S-8 filed March 20,1998 and June 27, 2001). /s/ Grant Thornton LLP    Baltimore, MarylandMarch 14, 2005
E-3
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 141 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 141

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 regarding the permissible sources of funding for elections for public 
                   office and State ballot measures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2018

Mr. McNerney (for himself and Mr. Jones) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 regarding the permissible sources of funding for elections for public 
                   office and State ballot measures.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The only source of funding to directly or indirectly 
support or oppose a campaign for election to public office shall be 
either contributions by individual citizens to the principal campaign 
committee controlled by the candidate or funds provided under a system 
of public election financing or voter education established by 
Congress, the State, or other jurisdiction as appropriate.
    ``Section 2. The only source of funding that may be used to 
directly or indirectly support or oppose a ballot measure to amend a 
State constitution or other initiatives or referenda shall be either 
contributions made by individuals who are eligible to vote on the 
measure or funds provided under a system of public election financing 
or voter education established by the State.
    ``Section 3. Congress, the States, and local jurisdictions shall 
establish limits on the amount of contributions individuals may make 
with respect to a single campaign for election to Federal, State, or 
local office, respectively, including limits on the amount of 
contributions an individual who is a candidate for such office may make 
with respect to the individual's own campaign, and the States and local 
jurisdictions shall establish limits on the amount of contributions 
individuals may make with respect to a ballot measure.
    ``Section 4. Congress and the States shall have the power to carry 
out this article through appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 5. Nothing in this article shall be construed to grant 
Congress or the States the power to abridge the freedom of the 
press.''.
                                 <all>
```