alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 104 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 104

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent certain 
programs that assist homeless veterans and other veterans with special 
                     needs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent certain 
programs that assist homeless veterans and other veterans with special 
                     needs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helping Homeless Veterans Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAMS ASSISTING HOMELESS VETERANS AND OTHER VETERANS WITH 
              SPECIAL NEEDS.

    (a) Homeless Veterans Reintegration Programs.--Section 2021(e)(1) 
of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(G) $50,000,000 for each fiscal year after 2017.''.
    (b) Referral and Counseling Services for Veterans at Risk of 
Homelessness Who Are Transitioning From Certain Institutions.--Section 
2023 of such title is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (d); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).
    (c) Treatment for Seriously Mentally Ill and Homeless Veterans.--
Section 2031 of such title is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``(a)''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (b).
    (d) Housing Assistance for Homeless Veterans.--Section 2041 of such 
title is amended by striking subsection (c).
    (e) Financial Assistance for Supportive Services for Very Low-
Income Veteran Families in Permanent Housing.--Section 2044(e)(1) of 
such title is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
            ``(F) $300,000,000 for each fiscal year after fiscal year 
        2017.''.
    (f) Grant Program for Homeless Veterans With Special Needs.--
Section 2061(d)(1) of such title is amended--
            (1) by striking ``each of fiscal years 2007 through 2017'' 
        and inserting ``each fiscal year''; and
            (2) by striking ``such''.
    (g) Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans.--Section 2066 of such 
title is amended by striking subsection (d).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
<PAGE>


                              EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

       We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
  registration statements on Form S-3 (Registration Statement Nos. 33-
  47497 and 33-62797) of American Express Credit Corporation and in
  the related prospecti of our report dated February 7, 1997, with
  respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
  American Express Credit Corporation included in this Annual Report
  on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP




  New York, New York
  March 25, 1997
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket No. 16-1587 

TNT CRANE & RIGGING, INC., 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief the following issues: 

1. Whether the judge, in finding Respondent lacked actual knowledge of the

violations alleged under 29 C.F.R. §§ 1926.1407(b)(3) (power line

encroachment during assembly/disassembly) and 1926.1407(d) (power line

minimum clearance distance), erred by concluding that Respondent’s 

supervisor was the only employee engaged in the violative conduct. If not, 

whether the Secretary established the supervisor’s violative conduct was 

foreseeable. See W.G. Yates & Sons Constr. Co. v. OSHRC, 459 F.3d 604 

(5th Cir. 2006) (barring imputation of a supervisor’s knowledge of his own 

violative conduct unless the Secretary establishes that conduct was 

foreseeable). 

2. Whether Respondent established the affirmative defense of unpreventable 

employee misconduct with respect to either violation. 

The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider either the merits 

or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 
2

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission 

in accordance with Commission Rule 93. The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed 

in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service.

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: December 10, 2020 /s/ 

 John X. Cerveny 

 Executive Secretary

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, 

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. 

Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
##  	  John X. Cerveny Named Executive Secretary of the Review Commission

**John X. Cerveny Named Executive Secretary of the Review Commission**

John X. Cerveny has been named Executive Secretary of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. During his tenure at the Review Commission, Mr. Cerveny served as Acting Executive Secretary starting in early 2014, as Deputy Executive Secretary for the Commission starting in 2006, and as an attorney advisor in the Office of the General Counsel starting in 1987.

As Executive Secretary, Mr. Cerveny will be responsible for supervising the docketing of contested citations issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). He will also supervise the filing of documents before the Commissioners and advise them with respect to various issues.

Mr. Cerveny received his Bachelor's degree from Emory University and his Juris Doctor from William & Mary Law School. He is admitted to the Virginia and District of Columbia Bars and is admitted to practice before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Mr. Cerveny is originally from Baltimore, Maryland. He and his wife currently reside in Potomac, Maryland with their two children.

Mr. Cerveny fills the position previously held by Ray H. Darling, Jr., who retired at the beginning of 2014.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        DIGITAL DESCRIPTOR SYSTEMS, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Pellegrino, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Digital
Descriptor Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                        Date:  November 4, 2005


                                        /s/ Michael Pellegrino
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            Michael Pellegrino
                                            Chief Financial Officer
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 30 

Recognizing the 75th Anniversary of the establishment of the United States 

Navy Seabees and the Navy personnel who comprise the construction 

force for the Navy and the Marine Corps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2017 

Mr. KELLY of Mississippi submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 75th Anniversary of the establishment of 

the United States Navy Seabees and the Navy personnel 

who comprise the construction force for the Navy and 

the Marine Corps. 

Whereas, on March 5, 1942, Navy Construction Battalion 

personnel were officially named Seabees by the Navy Department; 

Whereas the purpose of the Navy Seabees is to build, maintain, and support base infrastructure in remote locations 

for the Navy and the Marine Corps, while simultaneously 

being capable of engaging in combat operations; 

Whereas the Navy Seabees dual role is exemplified by the 

Seabee motto Construimus, Batuimus: We Build, We 

Fight; 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 30 IH 

Whereas, for 75 years, the Navy Seabees have answered the 

call of duty to protect the United States and its democratic values both in times of war and peace; 

Whereas the Navy Seabees support United States national security at combatant commands worldwide, through the 

construction, both on land and underwater, of bases, airfields, roads, bridges, and other infrastructure; 

Whereas members of the Navy Seabees and their families 

have demonstrated unmatched courage and dedication to 

sacrifice for the United States, from service in World 

War II, Korea, and Vietnam to the recent conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere; 

Whereas the Navy Seabees exhibit honor, personal courage, 

and commitment as they sacrifice their personal comfort 

to keep the United States safe from threats; 

Whereas the Navy Seabees continue to display strength, professionalism, and bravery in the all-volunteer force; and 

Whereas March 5, 2017, is the 75th Anniversary of the Seabees: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the 75th Anniversary of the es4 tablishment of the United States Navy Seabees and 

5 the Navy personnel who comprise the construction 

6 force for the Navy and the Marine Corps; and 

7 (2) urges the President to issue a proclamation 

8 calling on the people of the United States to observe 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 30 IH 

1 the 75th Anniversary of the establishment of the 

2 Seabees with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
TELEPHONE CALL SUMMARY

PROJECT: Oil and Natural Gas Sector CALL INCOMING:

_ X

_ OUTGOING:

___ STAFF: Greg Nizich EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/FIG

DATE: February 9, 2012

CONVERSATION WITH: Heather Bleile

COMPANY: Wyoming Department of Environmental Q uality

Casper, WY field office

SUMMARY:

Glycol Dehydration Units

According to Ms. Bleile, in order to achieve a 98% reduction for glycol dehydration units, they

have to do one of two things, depending on location:

install a condenser and a combustion de vice; or install a condenser, flash separator and

combustion device.

That's considered a "package" that meets 98%.

Storage Tanks

To achieve 98% sources typically install a combustor alone. The monitoring is pretty limited

- monitor to verify the pilot flame is on when well is operating. Heather said most companies use

the same model combustor at all their sites.

VRU's are used when there is electricity. She said they can also run VRU's w/o electricity, but

then they need to run a gas engine to powe r them "and they don't like to do that." I asked why

they'd bother with the VRU compared to a combustor and she said it was due to the revenue

from the captured gas. She said downtime for a VRU is about 2 days per year in her experience.

She said during that time they are required to send the vapors to a combustor (98% verified

again).

Combustors, general

She said the operator has to use a combustor that has been "verified" by the manufacturer as

meeting 98%. BUT, there is no requirement/procedure that the manufacturer follows to

demonstrate 98%. They just accept the verification.
Exhibit 99(1)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Biltrite Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger
S. Marcus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

April 15, 2003


/s/ Roger S. Marcus
-----------------------
Roger S. Marcus
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Biltrite Inc. and will be retained by American Biltrite
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       104
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 121 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 121

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      relating to parental rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2017

Mr. Hultgren (for himself, Mr. Budd, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mrs. 
  Noem, Mr. Walberg, Mrs. Comstock, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. 
 Lamborn, Mr. Banks of Indiana, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Posey, Mr. Pittenger, 
Mr. Huizenga, Mr. Marchant, Mrs. Hartzler, and Mr. Babin) submitted the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      relating to parental rights.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, 
education, and care of their children is a fundamental right.
    ``Section 2. The parental right to direct education includes the 
right to choose, as an alternative to public education, private, 
religious, or home schools, and the right to make reasonable choices 
within public schools for one's child.
    ``Section 3. Neither the United States nor any State shall infringe 
these rights without demonstrating that its governmental interest as 
applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.
    ``Section 4. The parental rights guaranteed by this article shall 
not be denied or abridged on account of disability.
    ``Section 5. This article shall not be construed to apply to a 
parental action or decision that would end life.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Willis C. Moore, III,certify that:

1.                 Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Polymer Group, Inc.;

2.                 Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 22, 2005 | /s/ WILLIS C. MOORE, III                       |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Willis C.  Moore, III*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YANG MO GOO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

MARIA RULLO,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 22

- 55399

D.C. No. 8:22

- cv

- 00341

- JLS

- DFM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2023 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judg es.

Yang Mo Goo appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying Goo’s

request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and dismiss ing Goo’s action alleging

federal law violations by a state court judge pro tempore. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of d iscretion the denial of an IFP

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 24 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 55399

request

. Rodriguez v. Steck , 795 F.3d 1187, 1188 (9th Cir. 2015) (order)

. We

review de novo a determination of judicial immunity

. Sadoski v. Mosley , 435 F.3d

1076, 1077 n.1 (9th Cir. 2006)

. We affirm.

The district court properly denied Goo’s request to proceed IFP and

dismissed Goo’s action as barred by absolute immunity. See Ashelman v. Pope

,

793 F.2d 1072 , 1075

- 78 (9th Cir. 1986) (en banc) (“ Judges and those performing

judge

- like functions are absolu tely immune from damage liability for acts

performed in their official capacities. ”) ; Duvall v. County of Kitsap

, 260 F.3d 1124,

1133 (9th Cir. 2001) (describing factors relevant to the determination of whether

an act is judicial in nature and subject to a bsolute judicial immunity).

Because Goo has paid the required filing fee on appeal

, Goo’s motion to

proceed IFP on appeal (D ocket Entry No. 6) is denied as moot

.

AFFIRMED.