alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2360-E2361]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  HONORING PHIL FULMER'S TENURE AS UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE'S FOOTBALL 
                                 COACH

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. BART GORDON

                              of tennessee

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. GORDON of Tennessee. Madam Speaker, today I rise to honor Phil 
Fulmer for his impressive record as University of Tennessee's football 
coach. Coach Fulmer finished his career at UT with a record of 152-

[[Page E2361]]

52, including two Southeastern Conference titles, seven SEC Eastern 
Division titles and the 1998 National Championship.
  A Winchester, Tennessee native, Phil graduated from Franklin County 
High School and went on to UT where he played offensive guard for the 
Volunteers' football team. Phil and his team completed the 1969-71 
seasons with a combined record of 30-5, capturing the SEC Championship 
in 1969 and winning the 1971 Liberty Bowl.
  After graduating from UT in 1972, Phil began coaching as a graduate 
assistant in 1972, serving as linebacker coach and defensive 
coordinator for UT's freshman team. From 1974-78, he left UT to coach 
at Wichita State University and later Vanderbilt University.
  Phil returned to his alma mater in 1980 as an assistant coach and 
offensive coordinator. In 1992, he became the 20th head football coach 
of the Volunteers. During his tenure, Tennessee had 17 All-American 
selections, went to 14 bowl games and produced 16 First Round NFL draft 
picks. Phil was named 1998 National Coach of the Year by Sporting News, 
the Football Writers Association of America, the American Football 
Coaches Association, and the Maxwell Football Club. In 1999, he won the 
State Farm Eddie Robinson National Coach of Distinction Award. Phil was 
inducted into the Tennessee Sports Hall of Fame in 2001. Most recently, 
he was inducted into the Knoxville Sports Hall of Fame, in 2008.
  UT will always be a special place for Phil, having spent more than 34 
years there as a coach, student-athlete and a father of four UT 
students--Phillip, Jr.; Courtney; Brittany; and Allison, who plays on 
the UT softball team. Phil will continue helping his alma mater as a 
special assistant to UT President John Peterson.
  I wish Phil, his wife, Vicky, and their family the best in their 
future endeavors.

                          ____________________
```
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 14
- 00105
- CR
COURTNEY ME
- SHA FRANKLIN , Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 25,574

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Courtney Me

- Sha Franklin was adjudicated guilty of the state

- jail felony offense of credit card or debit card abuse by the trial court after it found “true” numerous violations of the conditions of her deferred adjudication community supervision. The trial court assesse d a two

- year sentence, and Appellant appealed. Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief , asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396,Franklin v. State Page 2

18 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1967)

. Although informed of her right to do so, Appellant did not file a
pro se response to the Anders brief.
In an Anders case, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, [] decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” Id. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400 ; accord Stafford v.
State , 813 S.W.2d 5 03, 509

- 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)

. An appeal is “wholly frivolous” or “without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy v. Court of Appeals , 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988)

. We have conducted an ind ependent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous , w e affirm the judgment. We grant appointed

c ounsel ’ s motion to withdraw from representation of Appellant. Notwithstanding this grant, appointed counsel must send Appellant a copy of our decision, notify her of her right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and send this Court a letter certifying counsel ’ s compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4. T EX
. R.
A PP
. P . 48.4; see also Ex parte Owens , 206 S.W.3d 670, 673

- 74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)

.

REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis , and Justice Scoggins (Chief Justice Gray concurs with a note)* Affirmed Opini on delivered and filed December 18, 2014 Do n ot p ublish [CR25]Franklin v. State Page 3

*(Chief Justice Gray concurs in the judgment to the extent it affirms the trial court’s judgment. A separate opinion will not issue.)
Page 1 of 2

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on August 31, 2010

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE*

BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

1 94-1374 Dayton Tire, 

Bridgestone/Firestone 03/27/97 DFR 08/01/97 Closed

2 94-3393 Southern Scrap Materials Co., 

Inc. 11/24/97 DFR 01/30/98 Closed

3 98-0755 Avcon, Inc., Vasilios N. Saites 

and Nicholas Saites 09/28/00 DFR 11/29/00 Closed

4 98-1168 Avcon, Inc., Vasilios N. Saites 

and Nicholas Saites 09/28/00 DFR 11/29/00 Closed

5 00-1402 Sharon and Walter 

Construction, Inc. 09/05/01 DFR 10/18/01 Closed

6 99-0958

Vasilios N. Saites, individually, 

and d/b/a Altor, Inc. and/or 

Avcon, Inc.; and Nicholas 

Saites, individually, and d/b/a

Altor, Inc., and/or Avcon, Inc. 

02/01/02 DFR 05/01/02 Closed

7 02-1164 Loretto-Oswego Residential 

Health Care Facility (RHCF)

01/27/04 DFR 02/23/05 Closed

8 02-1174 Loretto-Oswego Regional 

Health Care Facility (RHCF)

01/27/04 DFR 02/23/05 Closed

9 06-1990 AKM LLC d/b/a Volks 

Constructors 07/27/07 DFR 10/18/07 Closed

10 07-0645 Erickson Air-Crane, 

Incorporated 03/18/08 DFR 04/11/08 Closed

11 07-1796 Pullman Power, LLC and its 

successors

09/24/08 DFR

12 07-1578 Elliot Construction Corp. 07/24/09 DFR 08/05/09 Closed

13 06-1542 Thomas Industrial Coatings, 

Inc. 09/23/09 DFR 10/07/09 Closed

14 08-0088

Acme Energy Services d/b/a 

Big Dog Drilling, and its 

successors

12/04/09 DFR 01/26/10 Closed

15 05-0055 L&L Painting Company, Inc. 12/22/09 DFR 02/02/10 Closed

16 08-1292 Wal-Mart Distribution Center 

#6016 01/12/10 DFR 01/25/10 Closed

17 07-1851 Associated Underwater 

Services 01/13/10 DFR 01/29/10 Closed

18 08-1225 K.E.R. Enterprises, Inc. dba 

Armadillo Underground 01/13/10 DFR 01/25/10 Closed

19 09-1284 Shaw Areva Mox Services, LLC 01/20/10 DFR 01/29/10 Closed

20 08-1037 Nuprecon, LP 02/13/10 DFR 03/29/10 Closed

21 08-0866 Southern Pan Services Co. 04/15/10 DFR 05/05/10 Closed

22 09-0240 Deep South Crane and Rigging 

Co. 04/22/10 DFR 05/06/10 Closed

23 08-1547 United States Postal Service 04/29/10 DFR 05/21/10 Open
Page 2 of 2

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on August 31, 2010

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE*

BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

24 08-1389 Pike Electric, Inc. 05/04/10 DFR 05/06/10 Open

25 08-1318 LJC Dismantling Corp. 05/04/10 DFR 05/24/10 Open

26 09-0004 Stark Excavating, Inc. 06/15/10 DFR 06/28/10 Open

27 09-0005 Stark Excavating, Inc. 06/15/10 DFR 06/28/10 Open

28 07-0437 Cleveland Wrecking Company 07/28/10 DFR

29 09-1072 Boh Brothers Construction 

Company, LLC 08/25/10 DFR

* DFR – Direction for Review

REM – Appellate Remand

INT REV - Interlocutory Review
FY 2024 HSPD-12 Implementation Status Report

Date – 

Quarter

Number 

of

Employe

es

requiring

PIV

credentia

ls

Number of

Employees

requiring a

NACI (or at

least

equivalent)

that have

not

previously

undergone a

background

check

Number of

Employees

requiring a

NACI (or at

least

equivalent)

with

background

investigation

in process*

Number of

Employees

with

completed/

adjudicated

NACI (or

equivalent

background

investigation)

Total

Number of

PIV

credentials

Issued to

Employees

Number of

Contractors

requiring

PIV

credentials

Number of

Contractors

requiring

NACI (or

at least

equivalent)

that have

not 

previously

undergone a

background.

check

Number of

Contractors

requiring a

NACI (or at

least

equivalent)

with

background

investigation

in process

Number of

Contractors

with

completed/

adjudicated

NACI (or

equivalent

background

investigation)

Total

Number of

PIV

credentials

Issued to

Contractors

Number of 

other 

individuals 

(e.g., guest

Researchers

)

requiring PIV

credentials

Number of

other

individuals

(e.g., guest

researchers)

requiring

NACI (or at

least

equivalent)

that have not

previously

undergone a

background

check

Number of

other

individuals

requiring a

NACI (or at

least

equivalent)

with

background

investigation

in process

Number of

other

individuals

with

completed/

adjudicated

NACI (or

equivalent

background

investigation)

Total 

Number

of PIV

credentials

issued to

individuals

other than

employees 

or

contractors

(e.g., guest

researchers)

December

2023

51 2 2 49 51 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0

0

March 2024 52 0 0 52 52 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0

June 2024

September

 2024

Implementation Plan Summary

Planned Date of Full

Implementation

OSHRC has implemented HSPD-12

credentialing requirements.

Planned Total Number

of NACIs to be

verified/completed for

current employees: 0

Next Major Milestone:

The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission follows the HSPD-12 requirements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,343
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             388
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     34,387
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        136,043
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,127
<DEPOSITS>                                     169,761
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,093
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,218
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 192,127
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,543
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  547
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    34
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,124
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,243
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,283
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,841
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      125
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    899
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         899
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       519
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.81
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,063
<LOANS-PAST>                                        28
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,219
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       21
<RECOVERIES>                                        12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,335
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,335
        

</TABLE>
----

----

----

|   | (i) | the      name of the company which is to furnish fuel for the ferry flight and any      scheduled post-delivery flight training, the method of payment for such      fuel, and fuel load for the ferryflight; |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      cargo to be loaded and where it is to be stowed on board the Aircraft, the      address where cargo is to be shipped after flyaway and notification of any      hazardous materials requiring specialhandling; |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (iii) | any      BFE equipment to be removed prior to flyaway and returned to Boeing BFE      stores for installation on Customer's subsequent  Aircraft. |
|--------|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### WILLIAM W. PIERCY *vs.*GIDEON F. MORRIS.

When a road has been laid off by order of a County Court upon the re* port of a Jury, confirmed by the Court, and an appeal is taken to the Superior Court, it is too late to take exceptions to the Jury. ‘ The objection should have *been*made in the Court below, upon the return of the Jury, by a motion to quash the proceedings of the Jury.

Upon an appeal from the final judgment of the County Court on the merits of the case, the Superior Court can only determine on the merits.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the' Superior Court of Cherokee County, his Honor Judge MANLY presiding. The plaintiff and others had petitioned the County Court of Cherokee to have a public road laid out. Notice was given as required by the Act of Assembly. The defendant and others appeared and opposed the prayer of the petition. The Court ordered a Jury, who made a report which was confirmed by the Court and the road directed to be laid off. The defendant appealed to the Superior Court, and there objected to the legality of the proceedings, and contended that they were void, because, 1st, Two of the Jury were not freehoid-ers, (and in support of this exception proof was made); and 2dly, Because one of the petitioners was on the Jury, which *169surveyed and laid off the road. These, objections were o.verruled. The defendant’s counsel then offered to prove by one of the Jury that he himself did not assent to the report, but this was also not allowed. The Court then heard the case on its merits upon oral testimony and gave judgment for the petitioners, and ordered their judgment to be certified to the County Court. From this judgment the defendant appealed.

*Boy den*for the plaintiff.

*Francis*for the defendant.

Gaston, J.

The same points have been made before us as were raised in the Superior Court. In our opinion the exceptions urged against the regularity of the proceedings before the Jury and of the Jury,-ought to have been taken in the County Court, when the report was returned, by a motion to quash the proceedings. This does not appear to have been done, and after an appeal from the final judgment of that *Court*upon *the*merits of the dispute, the cause was to be heard and determined in the Superior Court upon the merits. This was done there, and we are bound to presume was rightfully done.

We see no sufficient cause to reverse the judgment of the Superior Court, and the appellant must payjthe costs of this appeal.

Per Curiam, Judgment accordingly.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10957]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              ADJOURNMENT

  Mr. WELCH of Vermont. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to House Concurrent 
Resolution 440, 110th Congress, I move that the House do now adjourn.
  The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 10 o'clock and 51 minutes 
p.m.), the House adjourned until Saturday, January 3, 2009, at 11 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
-  Newsroom 

# President’s Proposed Budget for OSMRE Invests $301.9 million in Communities 

March 9, 2023

Date: March 9, 2023Contact: news@osmre.gov

#### ***Abandoned Coal Mine Reclamation and Environmental Protection Remain Top Priorities***

**WASHINGTON –**The Biden-Harris administration today released the President’s Budget for Fiscal Year 2024. The budget makes critical, targeted investments in the American people that will promote greater prosperity and economic growth for decades to come.

“The President’s fiscal year 2024 budget proposal makes critical investments in America’s coal communities that lay a stronger foundation for generations to come,” said Laura Daniel-Davis, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management. “These investments will create good-paying jobs and encourage the economic growth of coal communities across the country.”

At the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, the budget will:
                  - Reclaim abandoned mine lands. A proposed $174.6 million will restore eligible lands and waters mined or left inadequately reclaimed before the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act enactment in 1977.                     - $135 million is for the Abandoned Mine Land Economic Revitalization grants program to return legacy coal mining sites to productive use, foster local economic development, and help create good-paying jobs.
                    - $20.4 million for state reclamation program oversight, expanding water treatment grants to mitigate acid mine drainage, federal reclamation operations and projects, and reclamation program development.
                    - $19.1 million for technology development and transfer, financial management, and executive direction. 
                  - Regulate coal mining and provide technical assistance. A request of $127.3 million will help OSMRE and states regulate active coal mining activities and provide technical training and assistance to state regulatory programs.                     - $90.6 million for environmental protection programs, of which $65 million is for state and Tribal regulatory grants.
                    - $36.7 million for technology development and transfer, financial management and executive direction activities. 

For more information on the President’s FY 2024 Budget, please visit:https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/.

– OSMRE –

###### *The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement carries out the requirements of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 in cooperation with States and Tribes. OSMRE’s objectives are to ensure that coal mining activities are conducted in a manner that protects citizens and the environment during mining, to ensure that the land is restored to beneficial use after mining, and to mitigate the effects of past mining by aggressively pursuing reclamation of abandoned coal mines*.
**Exhibit 23**     **Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(Nos. 2-78713, 333-83336, 333-105999 and 333-110739) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-89711 and333-111555, 333-124528 and 333-128710) of Alcan Inc., of our report dated 1 March 2007 relating tothe financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting which appearsunder Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under theheading “Controls and Procedures” in this Form 10-K.    Montreal, Canada  1 March 2007 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
1
# Official Journal L 56/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 56 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6417 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 56

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6417 February 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/236 of 21 December 2020 amending technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 as regards to the timing of when certain risk management procedures will start to apply for the purpose of the exchange of collateral (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/237 of 21 December 2020 amending regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, (EU) 2016/592 and (EU) 2016/1178 as regards the date at which the clearing obligation takes effect for certain types of contracts (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/238 of 16 February 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/532 as regards a derogation from Implementing Regulations (EU) No 180/2014 and (EU) No 181/2014 for checks of specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union and the smaller Aegean islands | 10 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/236 of 21 December 2020 amending technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 as regards to the timing of when certain risk management procedures will start to apply for the purpose of the exchange of collateral (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/237 of 21 December 2020 amending regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, (EU) 2016/592 and (EU) 2016/1178 as regards the date at which the clearing obligation takes effect for certain types of contracts (
  1
  )

1

6

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/238 of 16 February 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/532 as regards a derogation from Implementing Regulations (EU) No 180/2014 and (EU) No 181/2014 for checks of specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union and the smaller Aegean islands

10

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.