alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant,

v. 

SEWARD SHIP’S DRYDOCK, INC.,

Respondent. 

OSHRC Docket No. 09-1901 

FINAL ORDER

This case is on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Sec’y 

of Labor v. Seward Ship’s Drydock, Inc., 937 F.3d 1301 (9th Cir. 2019), rev’g 26 BNA OSHC 

2303, 2305-08 (No. 09-1901, 2018). The Ninth Circuit’s formal mandate was received by the 

Commission on November 4, 2019. On April 29, 2020, Respondent withdrew its Notice of Contest 

in the case pursuant to Commission Rule 102, 29 C.F.R. § 2200.102. The Commission therefore 

vacates its decision issued on February 28, 2018, and Administrative Law Judge Patrick B. 

Augustine’s decision issued on October 6, 2011. 

SO ORDERED.

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: April 30, 2020 /s/ 

John X. Cerveny 

 Executive Secretary
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49554-49555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19903]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8836]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Northern Baroque Splendor: The Hohenbuchau Collection 
From: Liechtenstein. The Princely Collections, Vienna'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Northern

[[Page 49555]]

Baroque Splendor: The Hohenbuchau Collection from: Liechtenstein. The 
Princely Collections, Vienna,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign 
owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of 
the exhibit objects at the Bruce Museum, Greenwich, CT, from on or 
about September 20, 2014, until on or about April 12, 2015; the 
Cincinnati Art Museum, Cincinnati, OH, from on or about June 27, 2015, 
until on or about September 20, 2015, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 14, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-19903 Filed 8-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the
annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report
or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


By          /s/ PAUL G. DRISCOLL
         ------------------------------
                Paul G. Driscoll
               Vice President and
             Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 10, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and will
be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                      AMERCO and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Exhibit 12.  Statement Re: Computation of Ratios

                                                     Year end
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         1999   1998   1997    1996   1995
                                         ---------------------------------
Pretax earnings from operations       $  97.6   76.3   83.5    96.2   93.5
Plus:  Interest expense                  73.7   79.4   76.0    67.6   68.6
       Preferred stock dividends         17.4   20.8   16.9    13.0   13.0
       Amortization of debt expense
         and discounts                     .3     .3     .1       -      -
       A portion of rental expense
         (1/3)                           39.6   30.0   28.6    23.0   22.2
                                         ---------------------------------

     Subtotal (A)                       228.6  206.8  205.1   199.8  197.3
                                        ----------------------------------


Divided by:


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                       73.7   79.4   76.0    67.6   68.6
  Preferred stock dividends              17.4   20.8   16.9    13.0   13.0
  A portion of rental expense (1/3)      39.6   30.0   28.6    23.0   22.2
  Interest capitalized during the
    period                                 .9    2.2    3.4     1.8    1.7
  Amortization of debt expense
    and discounts                          .3     .3     .1       -      -
                                        ----------------------------------

     Subtotal (B)                     $ 131.9  132.7  125.0   105.4  105.5
                                        ----------------------------------

     Ratio of earnings to fixed
        charges  (A)/(B)                 1.73   1.56   1.64    1.90   1.87
                                        ==================================

     AMERCO believes that one-third of AMERCO's annual rental expense is a
reasonable approximation of the interest factor of such rentals.
NO. ___________________

JOSE ISMAEL ARREOLA § IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS §
v. § STATE OF TEXAS § THE STATE OF TEXAS § AUSTIN, TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: NOW COMES, the Appellant, JOSE ISMAEL ARREOLA, and moves for an extension of time to file the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review in this case, and in support thereof would show the following:

I. a. This case is pending below in the 195 District Court of Dallas County, Texas under TH Cause No. F12-00581-N, styled State of Texas v. Jose Ismael Arreola. It is also pending in the Dallas Court of Appeals under case number 05-13-00181-CR. b. Appellant was convicted of Aggravated Assault/Serious Bodily Injury/Deadly Weapon/Family Violence and sentenced to 28 years in prison and a fine of $5,000.00. The judgment date was February 6, 2013. On December 5, 2014, the Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Appellant is currently in prison. c. The deadline for filing the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review was January 4, 2015. d. Appellant requests an extension until February 5, 2015, to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. e. The reason for this request is that during the last few weeks counsel has been working on the following: 1. Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus in Ex parte Dinesh Kumar Shah , No. 1040406, in the 182nd District Court of Harris County, Texas.
Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review - Page 1 PD-1666-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/22/2014 11:53:05 AM Accepted 12/29/2014 1:14:57 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK2. Br ief in United St at es v. E seos Igiebor , No. 14-10581, in the Unit ed S tates Court of Appea ls for the F ifth Circuit.
3. Sentencing hear ing in United States v. Rahee m Abdul Shabazz , No. 3:13-CR026, in the United States District Court for the Norther n District of Mississ ippi. WHEREFORE, PREMI SES CONSI DERED, Appellant respe ctfully pray s that this Motion be g rante d. Respectf ully submitt ed,

/s/ Gary A. Udashen GARY A. UD ASHEN Texas State Ba

r No. 20369590
SORREL S, UDASHEN & ANTON 2311 Cedar Spring s Road Suite 250 Dallas, Te x as 75201 214-468-8100 214-468-8104 f

ax
ATTORNEY F OR APPEL L ANT

CERTIFIC ATE OF SERVICE
The undersig ned here by cer tif ies that a true and corr ect copy of the fore g oing Motion for Ex tension of Time to File Ap p el lant’s Br ief was elec tronically delivere d to the Dallas County District Attorney ’s Offic e, 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., L .B. 19, Dallas, Texas 75207, to michael.c asillas@dallascounty .org , and elec tronically delivere d to the State Prosecuting Attorney , P. O. Box 12405, Austin, Texas 78711, to information@spa.texas.g ov, on this the 22nd day of Dec ember , 2014. /s/ Gary A. Udashe n GARY A. UD ASHEN

M ot ion f or Ex tension o f Tim e to File A ppellant’s P etitio n fo r Discret ionar y Re view - Pag e 2
EXHIBIT 32.2 Certification
Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Polymer Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James L. Schaeffer,
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act 0f 1934, as amended; and (2)The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. /s/ James L.
  SchaefferJames L. SchaefferActing Chief Financial Officer*  November 12, 2003  
 *James
G. Boyd, the Companys Chief Financial Officer, was involved in an automobile
accident on May 8, 2003 and has been recovering since such date.


---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 44 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.44

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                            Joint Resolution

 
   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior 
  relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the 
procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to 
           the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management of the Department of 
the Interior relating to ``Resource Management Planning'' (published at 
81 Fed. Reg. 89580 (December 12, 2016)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
----

----

| [CONFIDENTIAL      PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A      REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]  |  [CONFIDENTIAL      PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A      REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [CONFIDENTIAL      PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A      REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]       | [CONFIDENTIAL      PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A      REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]             |

----

| Premium Class (PC)      Seats | [CONFIDENTIAL      PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A      REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Lifevests[CONFIDENTIAL      PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A      REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Galley      Meal Carts[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE      COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL    TREATMENT] |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### United States National Bank, Respondent, vs. Town of Swiss, Appellant.

*March 7*

April 3, *1928.*

*177For the appellant there was a brief by *Hanitch, Hartley & Johnson*of Superior, and oral argument by *Clarence J. Hartley.*

*H. V. Gard*of Superior, for the respondent.

Stevens, J.

(1) The complaint contains two counts. The first is upon the promissory note given by the town, which is the note involved in *Town of Swiss v. United States National Bank,*decided herewith *(ante,*p. 171, 218 N. W. 842).

The second count alleges the loan of money to the defendant town of Swiss by the Danbury State Bank, the statement of an account between the Danbury State Bank and the town, the giving of the note in suit to represent the amount of the account stated, and the assignment of the note and of the indebtedness evidenced by it to the plaintiff bank, which is alleged to be the owner and holder of the note and of the indebtedness evidenced by the note.

Giving the complaint the liberal construction which we must give it when its sufficiency is challenged by general demurrer, it must be held that each count of the complaint states a cause of action to recover the amount due upon the promissory note which is here in question. But the decision in the companion case of *Town of Swiss v. United States National Bank, supra,*renders this a moot question.

*178(2) The second count does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for either money had and received or upon an account stated, because, among other objections, it is not alleged that a claim based upon such alleged causes of action has been filed with the town clerk or laid before the town board of audit as required by sec. 60.36 of the Statutes. *Stone v. Langlade,*181 Wis. 104, 107, 193 N. W. 980.

Under the decision in *Town of Swiss v. United States National Bank, supra,*there can be no recovery upon this note, yet it must be held as a matter of pleading that each count does state a cause of action upon the note. It follows that the order overruling the demurrer should be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-0189V

UNPUBLISHED

RINA SCHNAUFER,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: June 14, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Hepatitis A (Hep A) 

Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to 

Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Matthew F. Belanger, Faraci Lang, LLP, Rochester, NY , for Petitioner.

Lynn Christina Schlie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On February 24, 2020, Rina Schnaufer filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a Hepatitis A (“Hep A”) vaccine that was 

administered to her on August 24, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the 

Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 14, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, Respondent states that “[P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the 

Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”).”

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

Id. at 9. 

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 554 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 554

    Honoring the life of Jacob Wetterling and the efforts of Patty 
  Wetterling and the Wetterling family to find abducted children and 
                        support their families.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2016

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Franken) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Honoring the life of Jacob Wetterling and the efforts of Patty 
  Wetterling and the Wetterling family to find abducted children and 
                        support their families.

Whereas Patty and Jerry Wetterling faced the unimaginable tragedy of having 
        their 11-year-old son, Jacob Wetterling, abducted near their home in 
        Stearns County, Minnesota, on October 22, 1989;
Whereas Jacob Wetterling was taken at gunpoint and his disappearance remained 
        unsolved for nearly 27 years;
Whereas Jacob Wetterling's body was not recovered until September of 2016;
Whereas Patty Wetterling bravely turned her grief into action and devoted her 
        life to advocating for missing and exploited children;
Whereas Patty Wetterling has become a nationally recognized educator on child 
        abduction and the sexual exploitation of children;
Whereas Patty Wetterling serves on the Board of Directors of the National Center 
        for Missing and Exploited Children;
Whereas Patty Wetterling and her husband co-founded the Jacob Wetterling 
        Resource Center to educate communities about child safety issues to 
        prevent child exploitation and abductions;
Whereas Patty Wetterling authored the publication ``When Your Child is Missing: 
        A Family Survival Guide'', along with 4 other families;
Whereas Patty Wetterling served for more than 7 years as Director of Sexual 
        Violence Prevention for the Minnesota Department of Health;
Whereas the Star Tribune selected Patty Wetterling as one of the ``100 Most 
        Influential Minnesotans of the Century'';
Whereas Patty Wetterling's efforts led to the passage of the Jacob Wetterling 
        Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act 
        (Public Law 103-322; 108 Stat. 2038), a Federal law that requires States 
        to implement a sex offender and crimes against children registry; and
Whereas Jacob Wetterling's memory lives on through the efforts of the Wetterling 
        family: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate honors--
            (1) the life of Jacob Wetterling; and
            (2) the efforts of Patty Wetterling and the Wetterling 
        family to prevent child exploitation and abductions across the 
        United States.
                                 <all>
```