alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State, Respondent, vs. Eigel, imp., Appellant.

*December 8, 1932*

January *10, 1933.*

*276The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *John F. Thieman*of Milwaukee, and for the respondent on that of *George A. Bowman,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, *O. L. O’Boyle,*corporation counsel, and *Clark J. A. Hazelwood,*assistant corporation counsel.

Owen, J.

Sec. 269.46, Stats., provides that a court may relieve a party from an order against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. The court was without power to vacate the order of March 6, 1931, except as provided in sec. 269.46, because the term during which it was made had expired. It is the contention of the plaintiff that the order of December 28, 1931, reinstating the action, is not an appealable order. *277The order of March 6, 1931, dismissing the action, was appealable because it determined the action. Sec. 274.33, Stats. The order of December 28, 1931, reinstating the action, was not appealable, however, because, although it affected a substantial right, it did not “determine the action” nor “prevent a judgment from, which an appeal might be taken.” *Raymond v. Keseberg,*98 Wis. 317, 73 N. W. 1010. While the motion made by the defendants was to .amend the order sustaining the demurrer, the court granted an order reinstating the case and placing it upon the calendar. The order of March 6, 1931, was not a judgment. A judgment is the final determination of the rights of the parties in the action. Sec. 270.53. The order, of December 28, 1931, reinstating the case is therefore not an order made after judgment, and not appealable under sec. 274.33 (2). Nol-is the order appealable under sec. 274.33 (4). The order sought to be amended was not an order made in chambers but one made in open court.

In *Bonesteel v. Orvis,*31 Wis. 117, it was held, upon the authority of *Walsh v. Dart,*19 Wis. 433, that an order vacating a previous order which dismissed an action for want of prosecution was appealable. The appeal was from an order of dismissal, and was taken by the party whose rights were thereby concluded. There can be no doubt about the ap-pealability of such an order. However, an order reinstating a case after an order of dismissal does not determine the action nor prevent a judgment from which an appeal might be taken. *Bonesteel v. Orvis*stands alone, and is contrary to the holdings in other jurisdictions. 3 Corp. Jur. p. 504, § 336. An order which opens *k*default and allows a defendant to plead is not a final order nor does it prevent' a judgment from which an appeal might be taken. *Port Huron E. & T. Co. v. Rude,*101 Wis. 324, 77 N. W. 177. An order vacating a prior order dismissing an action for want of prosecution within five years, and reinstating a prior *278order opening a judgment on cognovit, is not appealable. *Hanson v. Custer,*203 Wis. 55, 233 N. W. 642. See, also, *Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Frost,*206 Wis. 178, 239 N. W. 454.

The order not being appealable, the court is without jurisdiction to consider other questions presented.

*By the Court.*— Appeal dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90074-90075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26520]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION OF THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Institute of Museum and Library Services

50th Meeting of the National Museum and Library Services Board

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), National 
Foundation of the Arts and the Humanities (NFAH).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given that the National Museum and Library Services Board will 
meet to advise the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) with 
respect to duties, powers, and authority of IMLS relating to museum, 
library, and information services, as well as coordination of 
activities for the improvement of these services.

DATES: The meeting will be held on December 10th, 2024, from 9 a.m. 
until 5 p.m. or adjourned.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will convene in a hybrid format. Virtual meeting 
and audio conference technology will be used to connect virtual 
attendees with in-person attendees. Instructions for joining will be 
sent to all registrants. In-person attendees will meet at the Kellogg 
Conference Hotel Capitol Hill at Gallaudet University, 800 Florida Ave. 
NE, Washington, DC 20002-3695.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Maas, Chief of Staff and 
Alternate Designated Federal Officer, Institute of Museum and Library 
Services, Suite 4000, 955 L'Enfant Plaza North SW, Washington, DC 
20024; (202) 653-4798; [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Museum and Library Services 
Board is meeting pursuant to the National Museum and Library Service 
Act, 20 U.S.C. 9105a, and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), as 
amended, 5 U.S.C. App.
    The 50th Meeting of the National Museum and Library Services Board, 
which is open to the public, will convene at 9 a.m. Eastern Time on 
December 10, 2024.
    The agenda for the 50th Meeting of the National Museum and Library 
Services Board will be as follows:

I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes of the 49th Meeting
III. Welcome and Update
IV. Guest Presentation
V. Medals Process Discussion
VI. PCAH Update
VII. Grantmaking Overview
VIII. Reauthorization Discussion and Working Session

    If you wish to attend the meeting, please inform IMLS as soon as 
possible, but no later than close of business on December 6th, 2024, by 
contacting the IMLS Office of the Director at [email protected]. 
Please indicate whether you would like to attend virtually or in 
person. Please provide notice of any special needs or accommodations by 
December 1st, 2024.

[[Page 90075]]

    Dated: November 8, 2024.
Brianna Ingram,
Paralegal Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2024-26520 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036-01-P
```
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 74 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding 

the right to vote. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2017 

Mr. POCAN (for himself, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. RYAN of 

Ohio, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. NORTON, Mr. COHEN, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. MOORE, Mr. 

CARTWRIGHT, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. SLAUGHTER, 

Mr. NORCROSS, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. JUDY CHU of 

California, Mr. JEFFRIES, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. GRIJALVA, 

and Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD) submitted the following joint resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States regarding the right to vote. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 74 IH 

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

2 States after the date of its submission for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Every citizen of the United States, who 

5 is of legal voting age, shall have the fundamental right 

6 to vote in any public election held in the jurisdiction in 

7 which the citizen resides. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to en9 force and implement this article by appropriate legisla10 tion.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
WRAP TSS as of 7/15/09

Table Revised 10/21/09

Plan02d

(tpy)

PRP18b

(tpy)

Net Change 

From Plan02d to 

PRP18b

(Percent)

Point 646 990 53

Area 2,000 1,975 -1

On-Road Mobile 304 249 -18

Off-Road Mobile 625 411 -34

Oil & Gas 0 0 0

Road Dust 20 26 30

Fugitive Dust 96 133 39

Windblown Dust 0 0 0

Anthro Fire 1,709 886 -48

Natural Fire 23,793 23,793 0

Biogenic 0 0 0

Total 29,193 28,463 -3

Region Scenario Year Point Anthro Fire

Natural 

Fire All Fire Biogenic Area

WRAP Area 

O&G Off-Shore

On-Road 

Mobile

Off-Road 

Mobile

Road 

Dust

Fugitive 

Dust WB Dust

Primary Organic 

Aerosol

WY Plan02d 2002 646.32 1708.654 23793.198 2000.43 0 303.9875 624.7325 20.18 96.47

WY Prp18b 2018 989.75 886.356 23793.197 1974.65 0 249.215 411.225 25.995 133.4

Source Category

Statewide OC

Wyoming Planning and Preliminary Reasonable Progress

Emission Inventories

Wyoming OC Emission Inventory - 2002 and 2018
#### Mueller & Son Company, Appellant, vs. Gothard and another, Respondents.

*September 22, 1920*

January 11, *1921.*

*Workmen’s compensation:, Treble damages to injured minor:-Misrepresentation as to age: Constitutional law: Child working without permit.*

*1.*An award of treble damages to an injured minor,under the workmen’s compensation act should not be set aside because of false representations of the minor as to his age. *Stefs v. F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Co.*163 Wis. 151; followed.

2. Ch. 624, Laws 1917, providing for treble compensation in cases where a minor of permit age is allowed to work without a permit, is constitutional. *Brenner v. Heruben,*170 Wis. 565, reaffirmed.

Appeal from a judgment , of the circuit court for Dane county: E. Ray Stevens, Circuit Judge.

*.Affirmed.*

Action to review an order of the *Industrial Commission*awarding, under the workmen’s compensation act, treble damages to a minor in the employ of plaintiff, said minor being of permit age but employed without a permit. It appears that the minor falsely represented himself to be above the permit age and that the employer relied upon such representation in employing him.

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the briefs of *Otjen & Otjen*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *E. A. Morse*of Antigo, of counsel, and for. the respondent *Industrial Commission*on that of the *Attorney General*and *Winfield W. Gilman,*assistant attorney general.

The following opinion was filed October 19, 1920:

■Vinje, J.

The claim that the award should be set aside because of the false representations of the minor as to his age is disposed of adversely to plaintiff by the ruling in *136*Stetz v. F. Mayer B. & S. Co.*163 Wis. 151, 156 N. W. 971. A strong appeal and an able argument is presented'to the court to overrule its decision in *Brenner v. Heruben,*170 Wis. 565, 176 N. W. 228, holding that ch. 624. Laws 1917, providing for treble compensation in cases where a minor of permit age is allowed to work without a permit, is Constitutional. Counsel for plaintiff presented a brief as *amici curice*in that case, and made an oral argument therein. We have carefully considered the briefs filed in this case and find that the arguments but supplement those made in the *Brenner Case.*A reconsideration of the subject matter but confirms us in the view that the *Brenner Case*was correctly decided and should be adhered to.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $15 costs, on January 11, 1921.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9954]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Intelligent Transportation Systems Program Advisory Committee; 
Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Research and Innovative Technology Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces, pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 72-363; 5 U.S.C. app. 2), a Web 
conference of the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program 
Advisory Committee (ITS PAC). The Web conference will be held on May 
18, 2011, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    The ITS PAC, established under Section 5305 of Public Law 109-59, 
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A 
Legacy for Users, August 10, 2005, and re-chartered on February 7, 
2010, was created to advise the Secretary of Transportation on all 
matters relating to the study, development, and implementation of 
intelligent transportation systems. Through its sponsor, the ITS Joint 
Program Office (JPO), the ITS PAC makes recommendations to the 
Secretary regarding ITS Program needs, objectives, plans, approaches, 
content, and progress.
    Following is the Web conference preliminary agenda: (1) Welcome and 
Opening Remarks; (2) Review Technology Strategy Subcommittee Findings; 
(3) Review Standards and Harmonization Subcommittee Findings; (4) 
Review Program Evaluation and Strategy Subcommittee Findings; and (5) 
Summary and Action Item Review.
    The Web conference will be available to the public, but limited 
conference lines will be available on a first-come, first-serve basis. 
Members of the public who wish to participate must notify Mr. Stephen 
Glasscock, the Committee Designated Federal Official, at (202) 366-9126 
no later than May 11, 2011, at which time the Web conference URL and 
call-in phone number will be provided. Members of the public who wish 
to present oral statements during the Web conference must request 
approval from Mr. Glasscock no later than May 11, 2011.
    Questions about the agenda or written comments may be submitted by 
U.S. Mail to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and 
Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office, 
Attention: Stephen Glasscock, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., HOIT, Room 
E33-415, Washington, DC 20590 or faxed to (202) 493-2027. The JPO 
requests that written comments be submitted no later than May 11, 2011.
    Notice of this Web conference is provided in accordance with the 
FACA and the General Services Administration regulations (41 CFR part 
102-3) covering management of Federal advisory committees.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 19th day of April 2011.
Linda Dodge,
Chief of Staff, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2011-9954 Filed 4-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             370
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                        71
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,041
<PP&E>                                          57,120
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,891
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,912
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,170
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    614
<INCOME-TAX>                                       328
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                286
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       286
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
#### Susannah Nichols *v.*Thomas Cartwright.

!>From Pasquotank.

*A. by*deed “lent to his sister B. a negro slave and her increase, during her natural life, and at her death gave the said slave and her increase unto the heirs of his said sister, lawfully begotten of her body, forever.” Held, that the slave vested absolutely in B.

Holloway Sawyer, by deed executed on 20th January, 1798, conveyed, in consideration of love and affection, to his sister Absala Sawyer, as follows, to-wit: *“l*lend to my sister Absala Sawyer, the use and labour of thy negro girl Lidda and her increase, during her natural life, and at her death ! give the said girl and her increase unto the heirs of my said sister, lawfully begotten of her body, forever.” The question submitted to the Court was, whether Absala Sawyer took the absolute estate in the negro girl Lidda, or an estate for life.

Tavxor, Chief-Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

A rule applied to chattels, is, that where a remainder is limited by such words, as if applied to realty would constitute an estate tail, the person to' whom it is given takes the property absolutely. The deed before us does not permit a doubt as to the intention of the maker, for the words are precisely such as would amount to an estate tail in real property. Absala Sawyer is to take the use and labor of the slave and her increase during her natural life, and at her death they are to go to the heirs of her body lawfully begotten. This is exactly the way in which an estate tail in lands would subsist, the tenant having it in his power to defeat his issue only by a fine and recovery, or lineal warranty with assets. From the whole tenor of the deed, the legal construction is, that Absala Sawyer took the negro girl absolutely.
##### 



Exhibit 12 AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in millions) 2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Earnings:Earnings (loss) before income taxes
and cumulative effect of accounting
change
    
    $
    (821
    )
    
    $
    (1,409
    )
    
    $
    (3,669
    )
    
    $
    (2,449
    )
    
    $
    1,282Add: Total fixed charges (per below)
    
    
    1,480
    
    
    
    1,421
    
    
    
    1,532
    
    
    
    1,435
    
    
    
    1,068Less: Interest capitalized
    
    
    77
    
    
    
    66
    
    
    
    80
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    143Total earnings
    
    $
    582
    
    
    $
    (54
    )
    
    $
    (2,217
    )
    
    $
    (1,149
    )
    
    $
    2,207Fixed charges:Interest
    
    $
    653
    
    
    $
    525
    
    
    $
    522
    
    
    $
    406
    
    
    $
    281Portion on rental expense
representative of the interest
factor
    
    
    815
    
    
    
    888
    
    
    
    1,005
    
    
    
    1,025
    
    
    
    785Amortization of debt expense
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    2Total fixed charges
    
    $
    1,480
    
    
    $
    1,421
    
    
    $
    1,532
    
    
    $
    1,435
    
    
    $
    1,068Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2.07Coverage deficiency
    
    
    898
    
    
    $
    1,475
    
    
    $
    3,749
    
    
    $
    2,584
    
    
    $
    
 Note: In April 2001, the
Board of Directors of American approved the guarantee by American of
AMRs debt obligations. As of December 31, 2004, American has
guaranteed approximately $1.3 billion of unsecured debt and
approximately $466 million of secured debt. The impact of these
unconditional guarantees is not included in the above computation.
Exhibit No. 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
------------------------------
Effective as of March 19, 1998

              Name                                              Jurisdiction
              ----                                              ------------

Effective as of March 19, 1998 Name

American Biltrite (Canada) Ltd.                                   Canada
     200 Bank Street
Sherbrooke, Quebec JIH 4K3

     also doing business in Canada
     as Produits American Biltrite Ltee

American Biltrite Far East, Inc.                                  Delaware
     57 River Street
Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts 02181

American Biltrite Sales Corporation                               Virgin Islands
     57 River Street
Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts 02181

Majestic Jewelry, Inc.                                            Delaware
     57 River Street
Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts 02181

Ocean State Jewelry, Inc.                                         Rhode Island
     57 River Street
Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts 02181

Aimpar, Inc.                                                      New York
     57 River Street
Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts 02181

ABTRE, Inc.                                                       Tennessee
     57 River Street
Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts 02181


Ideal Tape Co., Inc.                                              Delaware
     1400 Middlesex Street
Lowell, Massachusetts 01851

American Biltrite Intellectual Properties, Inc.                   Delaware
     1013 Centre Road    Suite 350
Wilmington, Delaware 19805


                                       60
<PAGE>

K & M Trading (H.K.) Limited                                      Hong Kong
     1001 Hutchison House
     10 Harcourt Road
Hong Kong

Congoleum Corporation                                             Delaware
     3705 Quakerbridge Road
Mercerville, New Jersey 08619

ABItalia, Inc.                                                    Delaware
     57 River Street
Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts 02181


                                       61
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10860]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 RECESS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 12(a) of rule I, the 
Chair declares the House in recess subject to the call of the Chair.
  Accordingly (at 8 o'clock and 1 minute p.m.), the House stood in 
recess subject to the call of the Chair.

                          ____________________
```