39256 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that it justifies 

making any regulatory distinctions, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends Part 39 of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 39) as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

2011–12–16 Schweizer Aircraft 

Corporation (Schweizer): Amendment 

39–16723; Docket No. FAA–2011–0593; 

Directorate Identifier 2011–SW–002–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This AD is effective July 21, 2011. 

Affected ADs 

(b) This AD supersedes Emergency AD 

2011–01–52, issued December 20, 2010; 

Directorate Identifier 2010–SW–111–AD. 

Applicability 

(c) Schweizer Model 269A, A–1, B, C 

helicopters (serial number (S/N) 1846 and 

larger); C–1 helicopters (S/N 0156 and 

larger); and TH–55 series helicopters with an 

Aft Cluster Fitting Modification Kit, part 

number (P/N) SA–269K–106, installed; 

certificated in any category. 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This AD was prompted by a locknut 

working loose on the tailboom aft cluster 

fitting strut because the locknut installed on 

one expandable bolt did not have the proper 

threads. This AD contains terminating action 

to require modifying each expandable bolt to 

allow installing a cotter pin to prevent the 

strut and driveshaft separating from the 

helicopter and subsequent loss of control of 

the helicopter. 

Compliance 

(e) Required as indicated, unless already 

done. 

(1) Before further flight, remove both the 

left-hand and right-hand locknuts, P/N 

MS21043–3. Reinstall the locknuts while 

determining the locknut drag torque. If the 

drag torque is a minimum of 2 in-lbs., 

retorque the locknut to 23 in-lbs. If the drag 

torque is not at least 2 in-lbs, replace the 

locknut with an airworthy locknut. 

(2) Within 10 hours time-in-service, modify 

each expandable bolt, P/N ADB221–1A, 

torque locknut, P/N MS21043–3, and install 

cotter pin, P/N MS24665–132 or MS24665– 

151, in accordance with the Procedure 

Section, Part II, of Schweizer Service Bulletin 

(SB) No. B–295, dated December 21, 2010, for 

Model 269A, A–1, B, C, and TH–55 series 

helicopters or SB No. C1B–032, dated 

December 21, 2010, for Model 269C–1 

helicopters. 

(3) Before installing an expandable bolt, 

P/N ADB221–1A, to secure the tailboom 

support strut to the tailboom aft cluster 

fitting, modify the expandable bolt in 

accordance with paragraph (e)(2) of this AD. 

(f) Modifying both expandable bolts by 

torquing the locknuts and installing the 

cotter pins as required by this AD is 

terminating action for the requirements of 

paragraph (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this AD. 

Special Flight Permit 

(g) Special flight permits will not be 

issued. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(h) The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (NYACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the NYACO, send it to the 

attention of the Program Manager, 

Continuing Operational Safety. 

Note: Before using any approved AMOC, 

we request that you notify your appropriate 

principal inspector, or lacking a principal 

inspector, the manager of the local flight 

standards district office or certificate holding 

district office. 

Related Information 

(i) For more information about this AD, 

contact Stephen Kowalski, Aviation Safety 

Engineer, FAA, Airframe and Propulsion 

Branch, ANE–171, 1600 Stewart Ave., Suite 

410, Westbury, New York 11590, telephone 

(516) 228–7327, fax (516) 794–5531. 

Subject 

(j) Joint Aircraft System Component 

(JASC)/Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 5302: Rotorcraft Tailboom. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(k) You must use the specified portions of 

the service information contained in 

Schweizer Service Bulletins B–295 or C1B– 

032, both dated December 21, 2010, for your 

model helicopter to do the actions required 

by this AD. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Schweizer Aircraft 

Corporation, Elmira/Corning Regional 

Airport, 1250 Schweizer Road, Horseheads, 

NY 14845, telephone (607) 739–3821, fax: 

(607) 796–2488, e-mail address 

schweizer@sacusa.com, or at http:// 

www.sacusa.com/support. 

(3) You may also review copies of the 

service information that is incorporated by 

reference at the FAA, Office of the Regional 

Counsel, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, 

Fort Worth, Texas, or at the National 

Archives and Records Administration 

(NARA). For information on the availability 

of this material at an NARA facility, call 202– 

741–6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/ 

federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 3, 

2011. 

Kim Smith, 

Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–16571 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0152; Directorate 

Identifier 2010–NM–079–AD; Amendment 

39–16739; AD 2011–14–04] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault 

Aviation Model FALCON 7X Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above. This AD results 

from mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of 

another country to identify and correct 

an unsafe condition on an aviation 

product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 

condition as: 

On some Falcon 7X aeroplanes, it has been 

determined potential low clearance between 

electrical wiring or hydraulic pipe and 

nearby structure. 

Although no in service incident has been 

reported, there is no certainty that the 

minimum clearances would be maintained 

over time. In the worst case, interference or 

contact with structure might occur and lead 

to electrical short circuits or fluid leakage, 

potentially resulting in loss of several 

functions essential for safe flight. 

* * * * * 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 39257 

We are issuing this AD to require 

actions to correct the unsafe condition 

on these products. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

August 10, 2011. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of August 10, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in person at the 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, M–30, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom 

Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that would 

apply to the specified products. That 

NPRM was published in the Federal 

Register on March 8, 2011 (76 FR 

12624). That NPRM proposed to correct 

an unsafe condition for the specified 

products. The MCAI states: 

On some Falcon 7X aeroplanes, it has been 

determined potential low clearance between 

electrical wiring or hydraulic pipe and 

nearby structure. 

Although no in service incident has been 

reported, there is no certainty that the 

minimum clearances would be maintained 

over time. In the worst case, interference or 

contact with structure might occur and lead 

to electrical short circuits or fluid leakage, 

potentially resulting in loss of several 

functions essential for safe flight. 

Dassault Aviation has developed two 

Service Bulletins (SB) that provide corrective 

actions to ensure the minimum required 

clearance, as well as adequate protection 

between hydraulic pipe (SB n° 0 92) and 

electrical wiring (SB n° 006) and the 

aeroplane structure. 

This [European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA)] AD requires the implementation of 

both SBs on the affected aeroplanes. 

Since issuance of EASA AD 2010–0029, 

Dassault Aviation has developed 

modifications M1036 and M1037. M1036 is 

equivalent to M1007 while M1037 is 

equivalent to M1020. These modifications are 

embodied during production on new 

aeroplanes. 

This [EASA] AD has been revised to 

exclude from the AD applicability the 

aeroplanes on which those modifications are 

embodied. 

Required actions include general 

visual inspections for damage of wiring 

bundles and feeders. Damage includes, 

but is not limited to: Signs of overheat, 

discoloration, or damaged and cut 

strands on the cables and insulating 

sleeves. Corrective actions for damage of 

wiring bundles and feeders include 

repairing damage. Other required 

actions include modifying the 

applicable wiring and layout, a general 

visual inspection for absence of marks 

of the rear tank wall at the contact area, 

installing a protective plate on the rear 

tank wall, and installing a hydraulic 

pipe if necessary. If contact marks are 

found, required actions include an eddy 

current inspection or a penetrant 

inspection for cracks, and repair if 

necessary. You may obtain further 

information by examining the MCAI in 

the AD docket. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. We 

received no comments on the NPRM or 

on the determination of the cost to the 

public. 

Editorial Change 

We have made a minor editorial 

change to paragraph (g)(3)(ii)(A) of this 

AD. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the available data and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting the AD 

with the change described previously. 

We determined that this change will not 

increase the economic burden on any 

operator or increase the scope of the AD. 

Differences Between This AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have required different 

actions in this AD from those in the 

MCAI in order to follow our FAA 

policies. Any such differences are 

highlighted in a NOTE within the AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD will affect 

21 products of U.S. registry. We also 

estimate that it will take about 65 workhours per product to comply with the 

basic requirements of this AD. The 

average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. 

Required parts will cost about $0 per 

product. Where the service information 

lists required parts costs that are 

covered under warranty, we have 

assumed that there will be no charge for 

these parts. As we do not control 

warranty coverage for affected parties, 

some parties may incur costs higher 

than estimated here. Based on these 

figures, we estimate the cost of this AD 

to the U.S. operators to be $116,025, or 

$5,525 per product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this AD will not 

have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

39258 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains the NPRM, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

the Docket Operations office (telephone 

(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES

section. Comments will be available in 

the AD docket shortly after receipt. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

2011–14–04 Dassault Aviation: 

Amendment 39–16739. Docket No. 

FAA–2011–0152; Directorate Identifier 

2010–NM–079–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) 

becomes effective August 10, 2011. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Dassault Aviation 

Model FALCON 7X airplanes, certificated in 

any category; having serial numbers 2 

through 22 inclusive, 24 through 26 

inclusive, 29, 30, 32 and subsequent; except 

those on which modifications M964, M937, 

M976, M1007 or M1036, M1020 or M1037, 

and M1022 have all been implemented. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 20: Air Frame Wiring; and 

ATA Code 29: Hydraulic Power. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

On some Falcon 7X aeroplanes, it has been 

determined potential low clearance between 

electrical wiring or hydraulic pipe and 

nearby structure. 

Although no in service incident has been 

reported, there is no certainty that the 

minimum clearances would be maintained 

over time. In the worst case, interference or 

contact with structure might occur and lead 

to electrical short circuits or fluid leakage, 

potentially resulting in loss of several 

functions essential for safe flight. 

* * * * * 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Inspections and Modification of Wiring and 

Rear Fuel Tank Panel 

(g) Within 10 months or 650 flight hours 

after the effective date of this AD, whichever 

occurs first, do the actions specified in 

paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD. 

(1) Do a general visual inspection for 

damage of wiring bundles and feeders, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Dassault Mandatory Service 

Bulletin 7X–006, Revision 1, dated March 3, 

2010. If any damage is found, before further 

flight, repair, in accordance with Dassault 

Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–006, Revision 

1, dated March 3, 2010. 

(2) Modify the applicable wiring and 

layout, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault 

Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–006, Revision 

1, dated March 3, 2010. 

(3) Do a general visual inspection for 

absence of marks on the rear tank wall at the 

contact area, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault 

Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–092, Revision 

1, dated January 4, 2010. 

(i) If no contact marks are found during the 

inspection required by paragraph (g)(3) of 

this AD, before further flight, modify the 

protective plate, and install a hydraulic pipe 

as applicable, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault 

Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–092, Revision 

1, dated January 4, 2010. 

(ii) If any contact marks are found during 

the inspection required by paragraph (g)(3) of 

this AD, before further flight, do either an 

eddy current inspection for cracks or a 

penetrant inspection for cracks, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Dassault Mandatory Service 

Bulletin 7X–092, Revision 1, dated January 4, 

2010. 

(A) If no crack is detected during any 

inspection required by paragraph (g)(3)(ii) of 

this AD, before further flight, do the actions 

specified in paragraph (g)(3)(i) of this AD. 

(B) If any crack is detected during any 

inspection required in paragraph (g)(3)(ii) of 

this AD, before further flight, repair the crack 

using a method approved by either the 

Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the 

European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or 

its delegated agent); and modify the 

protective plate, and install a hydraulic pipe 

as applicable, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault 

Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–092, Revision 

1, dated January 4, 2010. 

Credit for Actions Accomplished in 

Accordance With Previous Service 

Information 

(h) Doing a general visual inspection for 

damage, repairing wiring bundles and 

feeders, and modifying the applicable wiring 

and layout, in accordance with Dassault 

Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–006, dated 

December 18, 2009; and doing a general 

visual inspection for absence of marks on the 

rear tank wall at the contact area, modifying 

the protective plate, installing a hydraulic 

pipe as applicable, and doing either an eddy 

current inspection for cracks or a penetrant 

inspection for cracks, in accordance with 

Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–092, 

dated July 17, 2009; before the effective date 

of this AD is acceptable for compliance with 

the corresponding actions required by 

paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(i) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, 

Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, 

ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using 

any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 

principal inspector, or lacking a principal 

inspector, the manager of the local flight 

standards district office/certificate holding 

district office. The AMOC approval letter 

must specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

Related Information 

(j) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness 

Directive 2010–0029R1, dated November 25, 

2010; Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin 

7X–006, Revision 1, dated March 3, 2010; 

and Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X– 

092, Revision 1, dated January 4, 2010; for 

related information. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(k) You must use Dassault Mandatory 

Service Bulletin 7X–006, Revision 1, dated 

March 3, 2010; and Dassault Mandatory 

Service Bulletin 7X–092, Revision 1, dated 

January 4, 2010; as applicable; to do the 

actions required by this AD, unless the AD 

specifies otherwise. 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

this service information under 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 

2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey 07606; 

telephone 201–440–6700; Internet http:// 

www.dassaultfalcon.com. 

(3) You may review copies of the service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 39259 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

(4) You may also review copies of the 

service information that is incorporated by 

reference at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 17, 

2011. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–16057 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0116; Airspace 

Docket No. 11–ANE–1] 

Establishment of Class E Airspace; 

Brunswick, ME 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This action corrects the 

effective date of a final rule that was 

published in the Federal Register on 

June 22, 2011, that establishes Class E 

airspace at Brunswick Executive 

Airport, Brunswick, ME. 

DATES: The effective date is moved from 

0901 UTC, August 25, 2011, to 0901 

UTC, July 28, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Fornito, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 

305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

Federal Register Docket No. FAA– 

2011–0116, Airspace Docket No. 11– 

ANE–1, published on June 22, 2011 (76 

FR 36285), establishes Class E airspace 

at Brunswick Executive Airport, 

Brunswick, ME. This action will move 

up the effective date of this rulemaking, 

as the new approach procedures are to 

be published July 28, 2011. The original 

August 25, 2011, effective date was an 

oversight by the FAA. The FAA has 

determined good cause exists to have an 

effective date less than 30 days after the 

publication of this final rule because of 

the financial hardship the airport and its 

employees would incur with a delay of 

this magnitude. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. It, therefore, (1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of airspace necessary to 

ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it establishes Class E airspace at 

Brunswick Executive Airport, 

Brunswick, ME. 

Correction to Final Rule 

In final rule FR Doc 2011–15305, on 

page 36285 in the Federal Register of 

June 22, 2011 (76 FR 36285), make the 

following correction: 

On page 36285, in the third column, 

in the DATES section, remove the date 

August 28, 2011, and replace with the 

date July 25, 2011. 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 28, 

2011. 

Rebecca B. MacPherson, 

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–16783 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 91 

[Docket No. FAA–2001–11133; Amendment 

No. 91–323] 

Manual Requirements 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) is making a 

minor technical change to a final rule 

published in the Federal Register on 

July 27, 2004. This final rule established 

new requirements for the certification, 

operation, and maintenance of lightsport aircraft under several regulations. 

In the final rule, the FAA inadvertently 

did not change an affected regulatory 

reference in one section. The FAA is 

issuing this technical amendment to 

correct that oversight. 

DATES: Effective Dates: This rule 

becomes effective on August 5, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim 

Barnette, Flight Standards Service, 

Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS– 

300, Federal Aviation Administration, 

950 L’Enfant Plaza North, SW., 

Washington, DC 20024; telephone (202) 

385–6403; facsimile (202) 385–6474; email Kim.A.Barnette@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

published a final rule entitled 

‘‘Certification of Aircraft and Airmen for 

the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft,’’ 

in the Federal Register on July 27, 2004 

(69 FR 44772). That final rule 

established new requirements for the 

certification, operation, and 

maintenance of light-sport aircraft. That 

final rule also redesignated the 

concluding text of § 43.9(a) as § 43.9(d) 

but did not revise a cross-reference in 

§ 91.417(a)(2)(vi) to reflect the 

redesignation of that text. This technical 

amendment will correct 

§ 91.417(a)(2)(vi) to reference the 

redesignated text in § 43.9(d). 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Accordingly, Title 14 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR) part 91 is 

amended as follows: 

The Amendment 

PART 91—GENERAL OPERATING AND 

FLIGHT RULES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 91 

continues to read as follows: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES