alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6445

ARNETT COBB,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., Chair; U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION; SCOTT 

KUBIK, Hearing Examiner, U.S. Parole Commission; WARDEN, 

FCI Gilmer,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00066-FPS-JES)

Submitted: August 29, 2011 Decided: September 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnett Cobb, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Arnett Cobb, a District of Columbia Code offender, 

seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent 

“a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Cobb has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
5· DEPARTMENT OF THE Subject Numb£: 

ADS-16-2 

Uniform Standards and Allowances 

Director 

Revise paragraph '•.b(l)(cJ to read: 

"(c) OSM Badge Requirement. All GS/GM 1801 series Surface 

Mining Reclamation Specialists (inspectors) have the option of carrying the 

inspector badge in lieu of wearing the badge on the uniform." * 

* The entire directive will be revised at a later date to reflect organizational 

changes,
H. J. Res. 44 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

Joint Resolution 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to 

Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used 

to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy 

and Management Act of 1976. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management 

of the Department of the Interior relating to ‘‘Resource Management 

Planning’’ (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 89580 (December 12, 2016)), 

and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 99.1


United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street NW
Washington, DC  50249

         Re:  Featherlite, Inc.
              File No. 000-24804
              Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
              as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
              of 2002

Ladies and Gentleman:

         In connection with the quarterly report of Featherlite, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Conrad D. Clement,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



November 14, 2002                                    /s/ Conrad D. Clement
                                                     Chief Executive Officer




                                       27
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10867]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          ADDITIONAL SPONSORS

  Under clause 7 of rule XII, sponsors were added to public bills and 
resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 661: Ms. Harman.
       H.R. 2266: Mr. Weiner.
       H.R. 2407: Mr. Abercrombie.
       H.R. 3175: Mr. Weiner.
       H.R. 4109: Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California.
       H.R. 4138: Mr. Hare.
       H.R. 5615: Mr. Petri.
       H.R. 5734: Mr. Pastor, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, and Mr. 
     Weiner.
       H.R. 5927: Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Clay, 
     Mr. Ellison, Mr. Etheridge, Ms. Giffords, Mrs. Gillibrand, 
     Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Ms. 
     McCollum of Minnesota, Mr. McDermott, Mrs. Maloney of New 
     York, Mr. Markey, Mr. Michaud, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. Price 
     of North Carolina, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Sherman, Mr. 
     Sires, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Stark, and Mr. Towns.
       H.R. 5935: Mr. Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania.
       H.R. 6134: Mr. Bilbray.
       H.R. 6157: Mr. Hinchey.
       H.R. 6201: Mr. Hare.
       H.R. 6597: Mrs. Maloney of New York.
       H.R. 6598: Ms. Harman.
       H.R. 6801: Mr. Walsh of New York.
       H.R. 6873: Mr. Moore of Kansas.
       H.R. 6949: Mr. Honda.
       H.R. 7157: Mr. Whitfield of Kentucky.
       H.R. 7275: Mr. McHugh.
       H.R. 7277: Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of 
     California, Mr. Goode, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Wilson 
     of South Carolina, Mr. Roskam, Mr. Mack, Mr. Ellsworth, Mr. 
     Wittman of Virginia, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Coble, Mr. 
     Wolf, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Petri, Mr. Sessions, and Mr. 
     Kirk.
       H.R. 7281: Mr. Filner.
       H.R. 7296: Mr. Stark, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Scott of 
     Virginia, Mr. McDermott, Ms. Lee, and Mr. Lewis of Georgia.
       H.J. Res. 101: Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Sensenbrenner, and 
     Ms. Kaptur.
       H. Res. 1037: Mr. Baird.
       H. Res. 1064: Mr. Courtney.
       H. Res. 1120: Mr. McCaul of Texas.
       H. Res. 1397: Mr. Ackerman.
       H. Res. 1475: Mrs. Miller of Michigan.
       H. Res. 1531: Ms. Lee, Mr. Stark, Mr. Frank of 
     Massachusetts, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. Pastor, and Mr. 
     Lewis of Georgia.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S238]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   ADJOURNMENT UNTIL 10 A.M. TOMORROW

  Mr. REID. If there is no further business to come before the Senate, 
I ask unanimous consent that the Senate stand adjourned under the 
previous order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 6:31 p.m., adjourned until 
Friday, January 9, 2009, at 10 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90352-90353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26667]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control

Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the removal of a person currently on 
OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN 
List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal 
criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject 
to U.S. jurisdiction of this person is unblocked, and U.S. persons are 
permitted to engage in lawful transactions with them. OFAC is also 
publishing updates to the identifying information of three persons 
currently included on the SDN List.

DATES: This action was issued on October 30, 2024. See Supplementary 
Information for relevant dates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Associate Director for Global 
Targeting, 202-622-2420; or https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website: https://ofac.treasury.gov.

Notice of OFAC Action

    On October 30, 2024, OFAC removed from the SDN List the person 
listed below, whose property and interests in property were blocked 
pursuant to E.O. 14024. This person is no longer subject to the 
blocking provisions of E.O. 14024.

Individual

    1. LENG, Holger, Tallinn, Estonia; Switzerland; DOB 12 Jun 1969; 
nationality Estonia; alt. nationality Switzerland; Gender Male; 
Secondary sanctions risk: See Section 11 of Executive Order 14024. 
(individual) [RUSSIA-EO14024] (Linked To: MILUR SA).
    Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(iii)(C) of E.O. 14024 for 
being or having been a leader, official, senior executive officer, 
or member of the board of directors of Milur SA, an entity whose 
property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 
14024.
    On October 30, 2024, OFAC updated the entry on the SDN List for the 
following persons, whose property and interests in property subject to 
U.S. jurisdiction continue to be blocked under the relevant sanctions 
authority listed below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[[Page 90353]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15NO24.001

Lisa M. Palluconi,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2024-26667 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
```
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0640 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 203

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Cond**  **ition Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 

### $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexi bility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
EXHIBIT 23.1 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**

**PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

**Board of Directors and Shareholders**

**CECO Environmental Corp.**

**Cincinnati,Ohio**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-130294 on Form S-3 and RegistrationStatements Nos. 333-33270, 333-143527, and 333-159948 on Forms S-8 of our report dated March 15, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of CECO Environmental Corp., which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ BDO USA, LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 15, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000927584
<NAME> FOAMEX-JPS AUTOMOTIVE LP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        118,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (58,055)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   71,652
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (665)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

SHAWN D. PURVIS dba PURVIS HOME

IMPROVEMENT CO., INC. (an individual)

and PURVIS HOME IMPROVEMENT CO., 

INC. (in the alternative),

Respondent.

 OSHRC Docket Nos. 19-1054, 

19-1056, 19-1905 

(Consolidated)

 

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief the issues presented in Respondent’s petition for 

discretionary review. The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider 

either the merits or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject 

to review. Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission 

in accordance with Commission Rule 93. The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed 

in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: June 30, 2023 /s/_______________________________

John X. Cerveny

Executive Secretary

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, 

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. 

Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                        1,206
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 42,031
<ALLOWANCES>                  1,414
<INVENTORY>                   60,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              4,445
<PP&E>                        83,591
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                296,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         86,701
<BONDS>                       130,701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      293
<OTHER-SE>                    67,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  296,349
<SALES>                       65,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         53,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 63,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              566
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            4,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (2,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                  547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2753)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (2,753)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for June 2022

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 18

2. Cases Added to Docket 1 

Petroplex Pipe and Construction, Inc.

19-1498

Direction for Review on June 16, 2022

3. Cases Subtracted from Docket -2 

A-1 Sewer and Water Contractors, Inc.

21-0562

Decision on June 1, 2022

TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc.

16-1587

Decision on June 2, 2022

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 17
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E60]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    TRIBUTE TO MRS. JOSEPHINE ARNOLD

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. FRED UPTON

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, January 9, 2009

  Mr. UPTON. Madam Speaker, I rise today in recognition of Mrs. 
Josephine Arnold of Portage, Michigan, for her nearly 30 years of 
distinguished service to the Portage Senior Center and the greater 
Kalamazoo area.
  Jo began working with the Portage Senior Center in 1979 and was named 
its charter director in 1992 when the Portage City Council created the 
Department of Senior Services to give the senior center a direct link 
to the council. Since its inception 30 years ago, the Portage Senior 
Center has gained 2,000 members and currently has a regular daily 
attendance of 200 senior citizens. Under Jo's leadership in 2000, the 
Portage Senior Center became Michigan's first nationally accredited 
senior center and one of an elite group of 127 centers that have been 
nationally accredited. Throughout the years, Jo's overriding goal at 
the center has been to promote personal growth, health, friendship, and 
independence for area seniors and all generation participants. In 
addition to her career with the city of Portage, Jo has been an active 
community member as an instructor at Kalamazoo Valley Community College 
and as the activities director of Friendship Village.
  Jo has been an inspirational figure, exuding friendship, generosity, 
and leadership in her commitment to a population often neglected by 
society. Her dedication to community development will be remembered for 
years to come and her example followed to continue to aid senior 
citizens in Kalamazoo.
  Once again, I would like to personally congratulate and thank Jo 
Arnold for her many years of public service to the citizens of this 
great country. Southwest Michigan is truly a better place because of 
her contributions.

                          ____________________
```