alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S· DEPARTMENT OF THE 

3/3/87 

is directive establishes the Office of Surface 

;~;;i'~: and Enforcement's (OSMRE) policy for providing copies of Federal inspection reports and Ten-Day 

(TDN). 

2. DEFINITIONS. 

•• A Federal inspection report is 

<~;p·o:' (IE-163) including any 

Reclamation Specialist after 

Surface Mining Control and 

b. Ten-Day Notice. A Ten-oay Notice is OS!-lRE's formal 

written notification to the State regulatory authority in a primacy 

State of an observed or alleged violation of a permit condition or 

program requirement at a surface coal mining operation. 

3. Field Office Directors shall establish a 

that permittees are provided with a 

copy of the Federal inspection report within 15 days of any Federal 

inspection and where a TDN is issued, provided with a copy of the 

TDN at the same time it is sent to the regulatory authority. 

4. REPORTING REQOIRE~1ENTS. None. 

5. REFERENCES. a. Section 517(e) of the Act. 

b. 30 CFR 843.12(a)(2). 

Replaces Directive, 'Furnishing 

of Inspection Reports," INE-3, 

7. EFFECTIVE DATE. Upon Issuance. 

8. CONTACT. Chief, Branch of Inspection (FTS) 343-5384.
Exhibit 23 Report and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and
Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation: The audits referred to in our report dated
February 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Allied Capital Corporation included the related financial statement schedule
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in the annual report on
Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial
statement schedule based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein. We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-45525, No. 333-13584, No. 333-88681,
No. 333-101849, No. 333-115979, No. 333-115980,
No. 333-115981, No. 333-130792, No. 333-130793 and
No. 333-143409)
 on Form S-8 of
Allied Capital Corporation of our reports dated February 26, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated
financial statements and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, which reports appear in Allied Capital Corporations
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our report on the consolidated financial statements makes reference
to the Company modifying its method of determining the
fair value of portfolio investments in 2008 due to the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. /s/ KPMG LLPWashington, D.C.
February 26, 2010
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:07-cv-00417-PMP-PAL Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 16 of 16
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1109 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1109

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2017

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
             To amend section 203 of the Federal Power Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF FACILITY MERGER AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 203(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
824b(a)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ``such facilities or any part 
thereof'' and inserting ``such facilities, or any part thereof, of a 
value in excess of $10,000,000''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION FOR CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS.

    Section 203(a) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 824b(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(7)(A) Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        enactment of this paragraph, the Commission shall promulgate a 
        rule requiring any public utility that is seeking to merge or 
        consolidate, directly or indirectly, its facilities subject to 
        the jurisdiction of the Commission, or any part thereof, with 
        those of any other person, to notify the Commission of such 
        transaction not later than 30 days after the date on which the 
        transaction is consummated if--
                    ``(i) such facilities, or any part thereof, are of 
                a value in excess of $1,000,000; and
                    ``(ii) such public utility is not required to 
                secure an order of the Commission under paragraph 
                (1)(B).
            ``(B) In establishing any notification requirement under 
        subparagraph (A), the Commission shall, to the maximum extent 
        practicable, minimize the paperwork burden resulting from the 
        collection of information.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect 180 days after 
the date of enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Outline of Transport Rule Revisions for Program Implementation

III. Specific Revisions

A. Budgets/New Unit Set-aside Revisions

 Of approximately 3,600 units in the Transport Rule EGU 

inventory, proposal would revise control assumptions at 

only about a dozen units, based on updated information 

about planned controls.

 Proposal includes re-calculation of new unit set-asides in 

a couple of states to account for new facilities coming 

online, to ensure allowance availability to new units

 Proposal also considers new information provided by 

utilities and system operators regarding immediate-term 

operational constraints that drive out-of-merit-order 

dispatch of certain units, whose emissions would affect the 

calculation of Transport Rule state budgets

 Results in revisions to budgets in FL, LA, MI, MS, NE, NJ, 

NY, TX, and WI, and revisions to new unit set-asides in AR 

and TX

B. Allowance Allocation Revisions to Units Covered by 

Existing Utility Consent Decrees

 Proposal aligns allocations to units under consent 

decrees to match their maximum allowable emissions, 

which ensures that all other allowances under that 

state budget remain available to other sources
C. Amend the Assurance Penalty Provisions to Make Them 

Effective Starting in 2014

 Starting the assurance provisions in 2014 will help 

promote the pace of robust allowance market 

development and will encourage trading to go forward 

immediately for reductions in the 2012-2013 timeframe

 Smoothes transition from CAIR to Transport Rule 

programs

D. Correct Typographical Errors

 These edits are cosmetic corrections.

IV. Recordation of Transport Rule Allowances

 EPA will record 99.7% of allowances from final Transport 

Rule on schedule for program implementation and promotion 

of markets; the other 0.3%, plus any new allowances 

resulting from the proposed revisions, will be recorded 

promptly after issuance of the final revisions rule.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SWIFT ENERGY
PENSION PARTNERS 1994A LTD'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS CONTAINED
IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEP-30-1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,040
<PP&E>                                       2,755,577
<DEPRECIATION>                               (956,271)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,867,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,863,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,867,346
<SALES>                                        308,641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               308,674
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,933<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                126,869
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            126,869
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   126,869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES LEASE OPERATING EXPENSES, PRODUCTION TAXES AND DEPRECIATION AND
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE. EXCLUDES GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AND INTEREST EXPENSE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### M. W. ROBINSON v. J. A. HOWARD and another.

*-'School Committee*— 'Public *■Officeris*— Mandamus—Jurisdiction.

.A sehool committee agreed in writing to 'pay a teacher oí a free school the sum of thirty dollars per month, and the teacher brought an action in a justice’s court against the committee to recover the same^ Held, (1) .-School committeemen are public officers and not personally liable on • contracts made in the lino of their duty.; nor will this action lie .-against them in their corporate capacity.

$) In suctnease *amiin.dam.us*to compel\£he committee to give an order *152on the county treasurer for the sum» due for plaintiff rs service?,, is the' only remedy;- and of this,, a justice of the peace-has.no jurisdiction..

*(Taylor*v.. *Sehoo-l Oom.,5*Jones,.98, cited1 and approved.),

Civil Action tried at Fall Term, 1880s of Lincoln Superior Court, before *Seyjnour,*Ji

The plaintiff'sued in. a justice's court upon- a. contract of which the folio-wing; is a copy r, “'We the undersigned committee-of Edward's district authorize M. W. Robinson, to-teach, the free public school in this- district, to commence on. Monday* July 15th, 1878, and continue until funds- are exhausted. Wag.es $80 per month.” (Dated July 2d, 1878, and signed by J. A. Ho-ward and J. H..H. McC'onnell, school committee). The plaintiff alleged that he had performed! the services and the committee had, refused- to pay him- the-wages agreed on.

From the justice^ court the- ease was. carried by appeal to. the superior-court, where judgment of nonsuit was entered,,, and the plaintiff appealed,.

*Messrs. Bphe ¿¡¿ Hoke,,*for- plain-tiff:

*Mr. B. G. Gohb,*for defendants^.

Ruffin, J.

If the plaintiff'seeks to- recover of the- parties whom, he styles,.“ school committee,” in their individual capacity, then his action will not lie; for-being public officers and- contracting with the plaintiff'as such, they are not-personally responsible; it being the law, that public officers are not liable on any contract they may make within the-line o-f their duty. If he seeks to recover of the “-school committee” in its,corporate capacity, then he-has-mistaken his remedy.

The school committee- is not allowed-, by law, to have any of the school fund under its control. I.t could, not, if it would, pay the plaintiff out of the proper fund... Its duty *153consists in giving the teacher an order on. the county treasurer for the sum due for his services. And should the-plaintiff get a judgment against the “ committee,”1 he would: be no nearer his money than now. His appropriate and only remedy is by means of *mandamus, (Taylor*v. Schoo*l Committee,*5 Jones, 98) of which a justice of the peace has no jurisdiction.

No error. Affirmed.
Exhibit 21



ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|Subsidiary                             |  | State orOtherJurisdictionofIncorporation
|-------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Alberto-Culver (Australia) Pty. Ltd.   |  | Australia                               
|Alberto-Culver Canada, Inc.            |  | Canada                                  
|Alberto-Culver Company (U.K.), Limited |  | United Kingdom                          
|Alberto-Culver International, Inc.     |  | Delaware                                
|Alberto-Culver de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico                                  
|Alberto-Culver (P.R.), Inc.            |  | Delaware                                
|Alberto-Culver USA, Inc.               |  | Delaware                                
|Beauty Systems Group, Inc.             |  | Delaware                                
|Beauty Systems Group (Canada), Inc.    |  | Canada                                  
|BDM Grange, Ltd.                       |  | New Zealand                             
|Cederroth International AB             |  | Sweden                                  
|CIFCO, Inc.                            |  | Delaware                                
|Indola Cosmetics, B.V.                 |  | The Netherlands                         
|IHB SpA                                |  | Italy                                   
|La Farmaco Argentina I. y C.S.A.       |  | Argentina                               
|Pro-Line International, Inc.           |  | Delaware                                
|Sally Beauty Company, Inc.             |  | Delaware                                
|Soraya, S.A.                           |  | Poland                                  
|St. Ives Laboratories, Inc.            |  | Delaware                                



Subsidiaries of the company omitted
from the above table, considered in the aggregate, would not be considered significant.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1060 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include certain individuals 

who work on farms or ranches as individuals who are employed in 

public service jobs for purposes of eligibility for loan forgiveness under 

the Federal Direct Loan program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2017 

Mr. COURTNEY (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, and Mr. FASO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include 

certain individuals who work on farms or ranches as 

individuals who are employed in public service jobs for 

purposes of eligibility for loan forgiveness under the Federal Direct Loan program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Young Farmer Success 

5 Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1060 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN FARM AND RANCH WORK2 ERS FOR STUDENT LOAN FORGIVENESS. 

3 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Section 455(m)(3)(B) of the 

4 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

5 1087e(m)(3)(B)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (i); 

7 (2) by striking the period at the end of clause 

8 (ii) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

10 clause: 

11 ‘‘(iii) a full-time job as an employee or 

12 manager of a qualified farm or ranch.’’. 

13 (b) DEFINITION.—Section 455(m)(3) of such Act (20 

14 U.S.C. 1087e(m)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the 

15 following new subparagraph: 

16 ‘‘(C) QUALIFIED FARM OR RANCH.—The 

17 term ‘qualified farm or ranch’ means, with re18 spect to a year, a farm or ranch whose earnings 

19 of gross revenue during the year from the sale 

20 of agricultural products are equal to or greater 

21 than— 

22 ‘‘(i) in the case of 2017, $35,000; or 

23 ‘‘(ii) in the case of any succeeding 

24 year, the amount applicable under this 

25 subparagraph for the previous year in26 creased by the estimated percentage 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1060 IH

1 change in the Consumer Price Index (as 

2 determined by the Secretary, using the def3 inition in section 478(f)) for the most re4 cent year preceding such year.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 26, 2011

p0919 

# Order

September 26, 2011

143211

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143211 COA: 297166 Wayne CC: 09-026001-FH MARK LEWIS NEDROW, a/k/a MARK L. NEDROW, a/k/a MARK LOUIS NEDROW, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.
OFFICIAL NOTICE

Pursuant to Title 40, Section 1506.6 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the Office of Surface 

Mining Reclamation and Enforcement – Denver Field Branch (OSMRE – DFB) gives notice of 

the availability of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) prepared in response to our 

receipt and analysis of the Lewis Mine Fire Mitigation Environmental Assessment (EA). The EA

examines potential environmental impacts associated with an abandoned mine land reclamation 

project designed to mitigate an underground coal mine fire on private property in Boulder 

County, Colorado.

The Lewis Mine Fire Mitigation project is designed to extinguish the burning and smoldering 

coal and to halt the mine fire’s progress by preventing oxygen flow to adjacent coal seams.

Contractors supervised by the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety – Inactive 

Mine Reclamation Program (DRMS – IMRP) would accomplish this task by excavating an area 

of approximately 1.5-acres to the bottom of the mine workings, a depth of about 25 feet below 

grade. Any of the excavated material measuring 100 degrees-Fahrenheit or greater would be 

blended with cool, non-carbonaceous fill at a ratio of approximately one-to-five. The blended 

fill, once cooled below 100 degrees-Fahrenheit, would be returned to the excavation and 

compacted in place. The disturbed area would then be recontoured and revegetated. OSMRE is 

providing federal funding to DRMS – IMRP to complete this project. 

Complete copies of the EA and FONSI are available at the Office of Surface Mining

Reclamation and Enforcement, Denver Field Branch, One Denver Federal Center, Building 41, 

Lakewood, Colorado 80225 and the Colorado Inactive Mine Reclamation Program, 1313 

Sherman Street #215, Denver, Colorado 80203.
Western Region

Interior Regions 5, 7-11

Western Region

Regional 

Director’s Office

Program Support 

Division

Indian Programs 

Branch

Field Operations 

Branch

Denver Field 

Division

Denver Field 

Branch

Casper Area 

Office

Program Services 

and Grants 

Division

Grants 

Management 

Branch

Program Services 

Branch 

Technology 

Management 

Division

TIPS Training 

and Technology 

Services Branch

TIPS Geospatial 

Information 

Services Branch
Order entered July 21, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00212-CR

JASON MONDRAE ROSS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-80241-2022

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 18, 2022 second motion for an extension 

of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief 

filed by August 17, 2022.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
         Officer of VOXEL pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
         of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VOXEL (the "Company")
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael
Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of VOXEL, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 17, 2008

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      -----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      -----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Financial Officer