alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Settlement Talks Program for Complex Job Safety Cases Earns High Marks in Independent Evaluation
#### THE CLERK OF DAVIDSON COUNTY COURT *vs.*JACOB WAGONER.

After a judgment, the Clerk has a right to issue execution against a party to the suit for his own costs, though that party has succeeded in his suit.

*Lockman’s*case, 1 Dev, 146, cited and approved.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Davidson county, at the Fall Term, 1843, his hono.r Judge Manly presiding.

This was a motion made by Charles Mock, clerk of the County Court of Davidson, for a judgment against the defendant under the following circumstances. There had been before a justice of the peace an action, by warrant, in favor of Daniel Shuler against the defendant Wagoner, in which a judgment was rendered for Shuler. From this judgment the defendant appealed. In the County Court there was a rule upon Shuler, at the instance of the defendant, to give surety for the costs; and, in consequence of a failure to comply with this rule, his cause was dismissed and a judgment entered against him for the costs of the defendant. Mock, the clerk, then moved for a judgment also against the deT fendant Wagoner for the costs due to him by Wagoner, which motion was overruled, and an appeal taken to the Superior Court. In this court the motion was also overruled, and an appeal taken to the Supreme Court.

*Iredell*for the plaintiff.

*Mendenhall*for the defendant.

Ruffin, C. J.

It has been usual for the officers of the court to indulge the successful'party for his costs, until a return of his execution therefor against the party cast. If raised on that execution, the officers, instead of the party, receive them, and thus the matter is settled. But it is clear, that every parly may be required to pay his own costs as they are incurred, or at any time when demanded. It is in-. .cident to every court to have a jurisdiction oyer its suitors *132and officers, to regulate the taxing and payment of the proPer costs 5 anc^ f°r purpose to make rules on those persons and enforce them by attachment. This is most usually done, when the officers have charged and levied more or higher fees than they ought to have done. But it maybe done as properly, wheu the party owing the costs to the officers fails to pay them. In this State it has not been the course to proceed by rule and attachmentTor his own costs, because, after judgment, a milder method by execution was given by statute. The act of 1784, Rev. Stat. c. 105, s. 24, is express, that where suits are determined and fees ate not paid by the party from whom they are due, the clerKmay issue execution for them. In *Lockman’s*case, 1 Dev. 146, it is true, the execution against the successful party was not moved for, until a return of *nulla ~bona*on a against the party cast. But the court there said, in so many words, that the party is *at all times*answerable for his own costs ; and execution was awarded against the party, who had gained the suit, for his own costs. So, we think, it must be here. The judgment is therefore reversed, and the rule must be made absolute as moved for by the clerk; and this certified to the court below.

Per Cueiam, Ordered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Alderwoods Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the sixteen weeks ended October 9, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

Dated:
November 18, 2004.

| |  | /s/PAUL A. HOUSTONPaul A. Houston
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)    
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/KENNETH A. SLOANKenneth A. Sloan
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

70

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 41 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2017

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange 
Commission relating to ``Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction 
                               Issuers''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the

              

 Securities and Exchange Commission relating to ``Disclosure of 
Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers'' (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 
49359 (July 27, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We have issued our report dated September 28, 2006,    accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedules    incorporated in the annual Report of Allied Defense Group on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for each of two    years in the period ended December 31, 2004. We hereby    consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the    Registration Statements of Allied Defense Group on    Forms S-3    (File    No. 33-101724,    effective February 7, 2003) and    S-8 (File    No. 2-96771,    effective April 22, 1985, File    No. 33-25677    effective December 14, 1988, File    No. 33-41422    effective June 27, 1992, File    No. 33-45303    effective January 24, 1993, File    No. 33-57170    effective January 19, 1994, and File    No. 33-57172    effective January 19, 1994 and From    S-8 filed    March 20, 1998 and June 27, 2001). /s/  Grant    Thornton, LLP     Baltimore, Maryland    November 6, 2006
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30547

Summary Calendar

__________________

JODY VAUGHN,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RYAN-WALSH, INC.,

 Intervenor-Defendant,

versus

AMERICAN RIVER TRANSPORTATION COMPANY,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CV-816 S

- - - - - - - - - -

February 1, 1996

Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jody Vaughn appeals from the district court's denial of

remand and entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant ARTCO

in his suit under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation

Act; 33 U.S.C. § 905(b). Vaughn contends that the district court

erred in denying remand because the Jones Act claim filed against
No. 95-30547

-2-

Ryan-Walsh was a nonremovable claim; therefore, the court lacked

jurisdiction to hear ARTCO's motion for summary judgment. Vaughn

contends that the district court erred by granting ARTCO's motion

for summary judgment because a genuine issue of material fact

existed with regard to ARTCO's compliance with its duty to

deliver a safe barge to Ryan-Walsh with respect to its gear,

equipment, and workplace. 

We have reviewed the briefs and the record and we affirm. 

The district court did not err by denying remand and granting

ARTCO's motion for summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE00562A 2

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, J.
Tracy Mey, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Indiantown Cogeneration,
L.P., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:  (1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. November 10, 2004
    
    /s/ J. TRACY MEYJ. Tracy MeyController and Principal Accounting OfficerIndiantown Cogeneration, L.P.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation and will be retained by
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
United States Steel Corporation

– Minntac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 2012

**Item 7** The facility's Best Available Retrofit Technology report, available on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Regional Haze website ("BART report"), discusses the low efficiency of the facility's wet scrubbers for SO2. Provide all documentation, inc luding reports and studies, to determine the current SO2 efficiency of all water scrubbers at the facility

. Additionally , provide all documents, including reports and studies, completed for the technical feasibility of efficiency

upgrades for each scrubber

. **Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were consulted in the preparation of the response:**  Stephani Campbell, Chrissy Bartovich
**Answer:** Two reports related to scrubber efficiency were found and have b een included and are provided as PDFs in this subfolder. Ingeneral, i ncreasing the SO 2 scrubbing efficiency of the existing scrubbers poses several issues. First, if more SO 2 is removed from the airstream, there will be a corresponding increase in the sulfate level of the water. When the L ine 3 scrubber was added in 2006, air permitting did not present an y unqiue issues; however water permitting posed a challenge. A scrubber blowdown treatment s ys tem was installed with water permit requirements for n o net increase in sulfate and hardness. If SO 2 removal efficiency was increased in the L ines 4

- 7 scrubbers through the addition of lime or other chemicals, water permitting would be difficult , if not practicabl y infeasible, because of the corresponding in crease in sulfate in the wastewater stream . The Lines 4

- 7 scrubbers are a once through s ys tem utilizing over 2000 gpm of water. This would create a stream which poses technical issues to treat, and likely would be economically and practicabl y infeasible. Second, as experienced in both the L ine 3 scrubber at Minntac and the Phase II scrubber at Keetac, the addition of lime to a scrubber for pH control to remove additional SO 2 creates an issue of scaling. If the pH scale goes to the basic side, calcium sulfate can precipate in the scrubber which creates a hard scale. The scale covers the walls and begins to plug the nozzles which reduces the water flow through the scrubber. This causes both maintenance and operational issues which results in downtime to clean out the scrubber.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 222 (Monday, November 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26810]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20701 and #20702; NORTH CAROLINA Disaster Number 
NC-20007]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of North Carolina

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4827-DR), dated 
September 28, 2024.
    Incident: Tropical Storm Helene.

DATES: Issued on November 13, 2024.
    Incident Period: September 25, 2024, and continuing.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: January 7, 2025.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 30, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of North Carolina, dated September 28, 2024, 
is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for 
physical damages as a result of this disaster to January 7, 2025.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-26810 Filed 11-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 April 18, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-14943

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

BIA Nos. A98-602-627 & A98-602-628

KEYLIZ ANNA BERTI, 

GREGORY ALEXANDER MORENO, 

VIANNA JULIETT MORRELL, 

Petitioners, 

versus 

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent. 

________________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

_________________________

(April 18, 2007)

Before DUBINA, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Keyliz Anna Berti, a native and citizen of Venezuela, petitions for review of
2

the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals that affirmed the decision of the

Immigration Judge that denied her asylum, 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(1); withholding of

removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3); and relief under the United Nations Convention

Against Torture. Berti argues that substantial evidence does not support the

adverse credibility finding of the IJ; bias exhibited by the IJ denied Berti a full and

fair opportunity to present her claims; and she satisfied the requirements for

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the CAT. These arguments fail. 

Berti challenged before the BIA neither the adverse credibility finding nor

the fairness of her hearing. When an applicant fails to raise an issue before the

BIA, she has not exhausted her administrative remedies, and we lack jurisdiction to

entertain the issue. Amaya-Artunduaga v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 463 F.3d 1247, 1251

(11th Cir. 2006). We are unable to disturb the adverse credibility finding or

consider the fairness of Berti’s hearing.

It is well-settled that an adverse credibility determination alone may support

a denial of relief. See Forgue v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 401 F.3d 1282, 1287 (11th Cir.

2005). Berti entered the United States on January 6, 1999, and maintains that in

1998 she was persecuted on account of her political opinion by the Bolivarian

Circles, a group sympathetic to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. The IJ based

the adverse credibility finding on, among other things, the fact that a United States

Citizenship and Immigration Services report states that the Bolivarian Circles did
3

not come into existence until 2001. In Berti’s case, the adverse credibility

determination is sufficient to support the denial of asylum, withholding of removal,

and relief under the CAT. 

DENIED.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0590)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3077/01

by Luis Berenguer Fuster (PSE) to the Commission

(9 November 2001)

Subject:   The case concerning State aid for the ‘Terra Mítica’ theme park (Alicante)

The Parque Temático de Alicante SA (SPTA), a public company owned by the Valencian regional government, has signed a number of agreements with two subsidiaries of the US multi-national Viacom, called Paramount Parks and Paramount Pictures. Under the agreement signed with the first of these companies, Paramount Parks undertakes to run the ‘Terra Mítica’ theme park for four years. At the same time, Paramount Pictures signed a contract for collaboration on the ‘Ciudad de la Luz’ theme park in Alicante. The Valencian regional government has granted a bank guarantee of up to USD 6 million to the SPTA for this contract.

Despite the pretence that the State guarantee is not for ‘Terra Mitica’, there is the following evidence that it is:

In view of all this, can the Commission say:

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(10 January 2002)

The Commission thanks the Honourable Member for the information he has provided. It will approach the Spanish authorities for more details in order to view the facts in the light of the rules on State aid, in particular with regard to the Terra Mitica file (1). It will make its findings known.

----

(1)OJ C 300, 26.10.2001.

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0174

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

GENE LYNN WATSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 12, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 7 2020

07/07/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0174
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT
           (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:
April 29, 2008
 By
    /s/ Victor M. PerezVictor M. PerezChief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90349-90350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26631]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

[Docket No. FHWA-2024-0018]

Withdrawal of a Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement for a Proposed Highway Project in Clark County, Nevada

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of 
Transportation (USDOT).

ACTION: Notice of withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA and the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) 
are issuing this notice to advise the public that they are withdrawing 
the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS) published in the Federal Register for transportation improvements 
to a section of Interstate 11 (formerly I-515)/US 95/US 93 in the City 
of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada. The project is commonly referred to 
as the Downtown Access Project.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    For Federal Highway Administration: Abdelmoez Abdalla, 
Environmental Program Manager, FHWA Nevada Division, 705 N. Plaza, 
Suite 220, Carson City, NV 89701; Telephone: (775) 687-1231, email: 
[email protected].
    For the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT): Danja Petro, 
Senior Project Manager, Nevada Department of Transportation, 123 E 
Washington Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89101; Telephone: (702) 671-8865, email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in coordination with NDOT, 
published an NOI on March 22, 2024, at 89 FR 20530, to prepare an EIS 
for transportation improvements to a

[[Page 90350]]

section of Interstate 11 (I-11)/U.S. Highway 95 (US 95)/US Highway 93 
(US 93) in the City of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada, known as the 
Downtown Access Project. The agencies hereby notify the public of the 
withdrawal of this NOI. The EIS process is being rescinded due to 
recent and ongoing reprioritization of major projects within Nevada, as 
well as the escalating overall cost of the project.
    Any future federally assisted action within this corridor would 
comply with the environmental review requirements of the National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); 23 U.S.C. 
139, CEQ regulations for implementing NEPA (40 Code of Regulations 
[CFR] 1500-1508); FHWA regulations implementing NEPA (23 CFR parts 771, 
772, and 774); and applicable Federal, State, and local laws and 
regulations.
    Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48.

Khoa Nguyen,
Division Administrator, Carson City, Nevada.
[FR Doc. 2024-26631 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
```
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 40 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Social Security Administration relating to Implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 

2007. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HJ 40 EH 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the So2 cial Security Administration relating to Implementation of 

3 the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (pub4 lished at 81 Fed. Reg. 91702 (December 19, 2016)), and 

5 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 2, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 40 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapment Amendments Act of 2007. relating to Implementation of the NICS Improve- submitted by the Social Security Administration ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule