alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of
ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2007



|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                   
|Paritosh K. Choksi Executive Vice President of
General Partner, Principal Financial Officer of Registrant

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40797

Consolidated with No. 97-41238 Summary Calendar

WILLIE BERRY, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TIMOTHY WEST; TROY SIMPSON, LIEUTENANT, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas (1:96-CV-168)

January 11, 1999

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *



### Willie Berry, Jr., a Texas state prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights

action for want of prosecution, and the order directing that he pay a partial appellate

filing fee. Berry briefs neither issue. This failure constitutes an abandonment of this1 Al-Ra’id v. Ingle , 69 F.3d 28 (5 th Cir. 1995).

2 5 th Cir. R. 42.2.

2 

### appeal. 1 

### Therefore this appeal must be and is DISMISSED as frivolous. 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 82 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 82

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule of the Bureau of Land Management 
 relating to ``Onshore Oil and Gas Operations; Federal and Indian Oil 
                 and Gas Leases; Measurement of Oil''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2017

  Mr. Westerman (for himself, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Gosar, and Mr. Cramer) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule of the Bureau of Land Management 
 relating to ``Onshore Oil and Gas Operations; Federal and Indian Oil 
                 and Gas Leases; Measurement of Oil''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ``Onshore 
Oil and Gas Operations; Federal and Indian Oil and Gas Leases; 
Measurement of Oil'' (81 Fed. Reg. 81462 (November 17, 2016)), and such 
rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                     [COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P. LETTERHEAD]


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Bestway, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-60471) of our report dated
October 7, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Bestway, Inc. as of July 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the years ended July 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.


/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Dallas, Texas
October 7, 1997
Congressional Record UNUM

E PLURIBUS

United States

of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110th

 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION

∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor.

.

S10975 

Vol. 154 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2008 No. 188 

House of Representatives 

The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Saturday, January 3, 2009, at 11 a.m. 

Senate 

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2008 

(Legislative day of Wednesday, December 10, 2008) 

The Senate met at 11 and 19 seconds 

a.m., on the expiration of the recess, 

and was called to order by the Honorable JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER, a Senator 

from the State of West Virginia. 

f 

APPOINTMENT OF ACTING 

PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE 

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The 

clerk will please read a communication 

to the Senate from the President pro 

tempore (Mr. BYRD). 

The assistant legislative clerk read 

the following letter: 

U.S. SENATE, 

PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, 

Washington, DC, December 16, 2008. 

To the Senate: 

Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, 

of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby 

appoint the Honorable JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER, a Senator from the State of West 

Virginia, to perform the duties of the Chair. 

ROBERT C. BYRD, 

President pro tempore. 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President 

pro tempore. 

f 

RECESS UNTIL FRIDAY, 

DECEMBER 19, 2008, AT 10 A.M. 

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 

Senate stands in recess until 10 a.m. on 

Friday, December 19, 2008. 

Thereupon, the Senate, at 11 and 50 

seconds a.m., recessed until Friday, December 19, 2008, at 10 a.m. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with SENATE
Exhibit 10.20.4


                        TERMINATION OF ALBERTSON'S, INC.
                         1990 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


     This   instrument   terminating   the   Albertson's,   Inc.  1990  Deferred
Compensation  Plan (the "1990  Plan") is made by  Albertson's,  Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation") effective December 31, 1999.

                                    RECITALS:

A.   The Board of  Directors  (the  "Board")  of the  Corporation,  pursuant  to
     Section 10.2 of the Plan, retained the right to terminate the 1990 Plan.

B.   The  Corporation  has  established  the  Albertson's,  Inc.  2000  Deferred
     Compensation  Plan and, as a result,  the Board has  determined  that it is
     advisable  to  terminate  the 1990  Plan and has  terminated  the 1990 Plan
     pursuant to a resolution duly adopted by the Board at a regularly scheduled
     meeting  of the  Board  held on  November  30,  1999,  and such  resolution
     continues in full force and effect.

                                BOARD RESOLUTION

     WHEREAS, upon the recommendation of the Grantor Trust Committee,  the Board
of Directors of the Corporation deems it advisable to terminate the Albertson's,
Inc. 1990 Deferred  Compensation Plan ("1990 Plan") effective  December 31, 1999
pursuant to Section 10.2 of the Plan;

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, (a) that the 1990 Plan be terminated
effective  December 31, 1999 pursuant to Section 10.2 of the 1990 Plan; (b) that
Participant  deferrals  under the Plan cease as of such date;  (c) that benefits
payable  under the 1990 Plan  shall be paid at such times and  pursuant  to such
terms and conditions as were effective  immediately  prior to the termination of
the 1990 Plan; and (d) that the Board of Directors,  the Grantor Trust Committee
and their duly  authorized  delegates  continue to have authority  under Section
10.1 of the 1990  Plan to amend  the  Plan,  in  whole or in part,  at  anytime;
provided, however, that no amendment shall be effective to decrease the benefits
or rights of any Participant theretofore accrued.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused its officer, duly authorized
by its Board of Directors,  to execute this instrument this 1st day of December,
1999, to be effective as of December 31, 1999.

                                               ALBERTSON'S, INC.
                                               a Delaware corporation



                                               By: /s/ Thomas R. Saldin
                                                   ------------------------
                                                   Thomas R. Saldin
                                                   Executive Vice President
                                                   and General Counsel
Allied Research Corporation                 EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.       Mecar S.A., a Belgian Corporation

        Wholly-owned and majority owed Belgian subsidiaries of Mecar S.A.

               A. Mecar Immobliere S.A.

               B. Sedachim, S.I.

               C. Tele Technique Generale

                      Detectia, N.V. (0.2% owned)

               D. VSK Electronics N.V.

                      Classics, B.V.B.A.

                      Detectia, N.V. (99.8% owned)

                      Belgian Automation Units, N.V. (100% owned)

                      I.D.C.S., N.V.

                      VSK Electronics, S.A. (a French Company)


2.       Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., a Delaware Corporation


3.       Allied Research Corporation Limited, a U.K. Corporation


4.       ARC Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

5.       Allied Environmental, Inc.

                                      E-4
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 61 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States giving 

Congress power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Mr. WOMACK (for himself, Mr. AMODEI, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. JENKINS of 

West Virginia, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. BYRNE, Mr. 

OLSON, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. COOK, Mr. ABRAHAM, 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, and Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio) submitted 

the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States giving Congress power to prohibit the physical 

desecration of the flag of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 61 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘The Congress shall have power to prohibit the phys5 ical desecration of the flag of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Eiij n Advocac y W Collaboratio n Result s

Februar y 18 , 200 4 Kare n Rega s Departmen

t o f Environmenta

l Protection 1 Winter Street, 8 t hFloo r Boston , M A 02108-474

7 Dea r Ms . Regas : Th e Environmenta

l Leagu e o f Massachusett

s ha s seriou s concern s regardin g 31 0 CM R 7.02(l)(b)(2) , whic h introduce s presumptive pla n approval s fo r

limite d pla

n applications
. W e urg e cautio n whe

n implementin g apla

n tha t provide s fo r

implie d consent . Whil e w e understan d tha t DE P i s unde r financia l an

d staffin g constraint s an

d i s lookin g to sav

e tim e i n writin g approva

l letters , those sam

e financial an

d staffin g constraint s ma y i n fac t preven t DE P fro madequatel

y reviewin g permit s withi n th e timeframe allotted
. Onc e th e timefram e ha

s passed , w e question DEP' s ability to mak e adjustments t

o plan s tha

t ar e not adequatel y preventin g emissions , a

s the pla n wil l hav e alread y bee n "approved. " Th e inclusio n o f

arequiremen

t fo r professiona

l engineer s to stam p plan s fo r

submission i s aste

p i n th e righ t direction
. However , compan y consultants ar

e stil l employee s o f

th e compan

y tha t hire s them , regardles s i f

the y ar e o n contract . Consultant

s functio n to fulfil l th

e goal s an

d need s o f their clients
. Thi s reduce s som e o f th e hop e tha t aprofessiona

l enginee r pai d fo r by acompan

y wil l necessaril

y submi t a n objectivel y adequat

e pla n unde r these regulations
. I f

DE P i s unabl

e t o sufficientl y revie w al l plan s prio r t o th e 6 0 da y deadline , an

d thi s ma y ver y wel l b e th e cas e fo r man y plans , the

n air qualit y i s not being protected by thi s regulation
. W e encourag

e you t o reconside

r th e inclusio n o f

presumptive pla

n approval s i n these regulations
. W e ar e ver y concerne

d tha t by allowin g th

e regulated communit

y t o regulat e itsel f i n th e absenc e o f sufficien t

DE P fundin g an

d staffing , yo

u wil l b e puttin g a

t ris k ai r qualit y an d th e healt h an d safet y o f th e peopl e o f Massachusetts
. Sincerely ,

1 Mega n Amundso n Polic y Researche

r

1 4 Beaco n Street , Suit e 71 4 Boston , M A 0210 8 (617) 742-255 3 Fax : 742-965 6 www.EnvironmentalLeague.or g elm@EnvironmentalLeague.or g
Argued and submitted April 30, 1992,

affirmed June 16, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*HONORATO VALENCIA ALVAREZ, *Appellant.*

(90-CR-0718-ST; CA A68492)

853 P2d 326

David K. Allen, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the case for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Janie M. Burcart, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Bonham,*120 Or App 371, 852 P2d 905 (1993).
### 316B RULE **TELEPHONE LOG** Name of Caller: John Sunda, SAI C Date: February 26 , 2010 Company Name: SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc. Street Address: 7401 W 129 Street City /State/ZIP: Overland Park, KS 66213 Person Contacted: Kent A. Martens, P. E. Titl e: Chief Technical Advisor

- Evaporative Cooling Contact Info: Tel: 913/664

- 7501

Fax: 913/693

- 9522 Cell: 913/302

- 7234 kent.martens@spx.com Questions: Called to inquire about treated flu gas disposal through natural draft cooling towers, their project to do this at the Cardinal Power Plant, and about natural draft tower cost and prevalence The AEP Cardinal power plant $47 million project includes demolishing the fill ring and replacing nearl y the entire unit 3 cooling tower internal comp onents. T he plant would have had to do this an yw ay to extend the life of the tower so it wasn’t necessary to accommodate the flue gas disposal sy stem. They do need to provide engineering solutions to deal with the hole through which the flue gas passes. A detailed engineering anal ys is is performed and the solution will be dependent on tower de sign its condition and various loads

– he mentioned that the towers are subject to substantial wind loads. One solution is to install a steel ring around the t ower near when the breach is. I confirmed that the s ys tem was only for unit 3 (the press release is vague about this. T he compan y that recentl y put in new stacks for unit 1&2 as part of those units FGD retrofit at the plant was well into engineering design for unit 3 as well when AEP decided to go with the SPX solution us ing the natural draft towers instead. AEP had already last year during a shut down lined the inside and outside near the top of cooling tower with a corrosion resistant coating in anticipation of the project and so this component was not part of the $47 million. Distance to the existing (or new) tower is an important consideration. He also noted that German y requires that treated flue gas be discharged through the natural draft cooling tower. I asked about a comparison of long term costs for natural draft towers versus mechanical draft towers and he said natural draft towers need an expected life of about 40 years andbe a base load operation like a large coal plant. I asked if he had a feel abo ut expectations

of the future use of natural draft towers and he mentioned that few of the 17 coal plants being proposed were considering natural draft towers but that a recent coal plant project now cancelled or on hold was not considering natural draft t owers until the option and savings such as stack costs for flue gas was introduced

. We discussed the issues regarding aesthetics and the nuclear stigma for natural draft tower s and I noted the trend in US businesses for short economic horizons, he agreed that the public acceptance issues are a problem but that new large coal plants do use long time horizons of 40+ years when evaluating plant economics.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0003959 11-FEB-2014 10:58 AM
<PAGE>

                          [Arthur Andersen Letterhead]



Superior Telecom, Inc.
150 Interstate North Parkway
Suite 110
Atlanta, Georgia 30339

February 13, 2001




Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for
a letter from a registrant's independent accountant whenever there has been a
change in an accounting principle or practice.

In the fourth quarter of 2000, the Company changed its method of amortizing
unrecognized actuarial gains and losses in computing its annual pension cost
for its defined benefit pension plans. Under the new method, any unrecognized
actuarial gains and losses that exceed 10% of the greater of a) the projected
benefit obligation or b) the market value of plan assets are amortized over
five years using a straight-line basis. Under the previous method, all
unrecognized actuarial gains and losses that exceeded the 10% corridor were
amortized over the average remaining service life of active employees.
Company management believes that this accelerated amortization method is
preferable as it will result in more timely recognition of significant
actuarial gains and losses in computing the Company's annual pension cost.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for
determining the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable
alternative principles has not been established by the accounting profession.
Thus, we cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in
accounting described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method.
However, we have reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to
financial reporting, in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our
opinion stated below is based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to
an acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under
the circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we
have relied on the business judgement and business planning of your
management.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Arthur Andersen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information 
extracted from the consolidated balance sheet and the 
consolidated statement of operations filed as part of the 
quarterly report on form 10-QSB and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such report on form 10-QSB.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           28604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    73945
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      21351
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                144548
<PP&E>                                          916230
<DEPRECIATION>                                  135130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  925648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           445873
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2201
<OTHER-SE>                                      479775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    925648
<SALES>                                         102297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 92741
<CGS>                                            63651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   119078
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (26216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (26216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26216)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
f-f -£b^U^—tJXl:>^Lg>Xo4- AU^ 3a t3»oi.5 

### ^cv^_u^3^^ : REGBVEDJfl MAR 25 2015 2v(pq.Ffvv3Ln8 AbolAeesta,Clerk

V. 

### TV* sA-aw. q\ ~v^yA^ W^o. ^w^ -\c> \AaA-e ~"TQ tLIE .;...Wa a ,^-y.._\j.^>.>e^ ^>< -yVo 4t-ac4-- ~yw^y 

### 1,,/^qjno \oQAfAg W^l V^^ Woyjg^'y v..n\^



## TV* cJL ~T~ Valo^lA ^joV- \^aju^JL b-e^e^ cyi>e,.

-O. 

### -A-Vr. ^ K^Vkt
AAdL£U lQ-^^—. 

### ^ X^_-^J^^^v—CcD-ps _„^^.£^cii^k*Jb^



## ^=diC du &Q-&- 

### SrnAii^«^= 

### j4ccV>L^ [ *„ ^y^-A-L jffj^ai&UL
^Q33g> -3353^