alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix D: Standard Operating Procedure Template

D-1

United States Department of the Interior

OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING

RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Washington, D.C. 20240

Subject: OSMRE Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) XXXX-XX, Title

(see page D-3 of this appendix for numbering guidelines)

Version Number: Enter the current FY and the version of this SOP issued within that FY

Effective Date: Enter “Effective Upon Issuance”, or a specific future date

Responsibility: Entity the responsible office, position title, etc. for this SOP

Primary Reference(s): Appropriate statute, regulation, or policy(ies)

1. Purpose

Explain in plain terms the purpose of the SOP. Provide context if appropriate.

2. Scope

Explain who or what the SOP applies to and who or what it does not apply to. 

3. Summary of Changes

Summarize the major changes from the previous version, or simply state “This is a new SOP”.

4. Definitions

a. Provide definitions to key terms the reader may not be familiar with.

5. Procedures

Provide sufficient instructions to the reader.

a. Step 1.

(1) Sub-step 1.

b. Step 2, etc.
 Appendix D: Standard Operating Procedure Template

D-2

6. Contact

Name and contact information for additional information.

Attachments: As needed.

Issued by:

Digital Signature Exclusively_____________

Issuing Authority
Appendix D: Standard Operating Procedure Template

D-3

Administrative Notes (remove before signing SOP) 

• AD/RD/SOH should attempt to follow the SOP template’s format; however, it may be

more appropriate to deviate from the format to better communicate the SOP’s content to

the reader. Final decisions on SOP format are made by the responsible AD/RD/SOH.

• All OSMRE SOPs are identified by two groups of numbers and a title

(e.g., OSMRE SOP XXXX-XX, Title).

1. The first set of numbers identifies the organizational code of the office issuing the

SOP. For example, SOP 1500-02, Survey Procedures, is issued by the Office of

Administration (organizational code 1500).

OSMRE AD/RD/SOH Office Organizational Code 

Director’s Office 1000 

Office for Equal Opportunity (OEO) 1001 

Office of Communications (OC) 1200 

Office of Planning, Analysis and Budget (OPAB) 1300 

Information Resources Office (IRO) 1400 

Office of Administration (OA) 1500 

Office of Human Resources (OHR) 1600 

Assistant Director, Finance and Acquisition (AD/F&A) 2000 

Assistant Director, Program Support (AD/PS) 3000

OSMRE Appalachian Regional Headquarters (Interior Regions 1 and 2) 4000

OSMRE Mid-Continent Regional Headquarters (Interior Regions 3, 4, and 6) 5000

OSMRE Western Regional Headquarters (Interior Regions 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11) 6000 

2. The second set of numbers and the title identify a specific SOP. The two-digit

number and title are assigned by the issuing office and are unique to a specific

SOP within the issuing office. For example, SOP 1500-02, Survey Procedures,

identifies the specific SOP by number and title within the Office of

Administration.
Table
1 to


Purchase
Agreement No. 3219


Aircraft
Delivery, Description, Price and Advance Payments


















































[CONFIDENTIAL
PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH


THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]


















































AAL


48980-1F.TXT                                                                                        Boeing
Proprietary Page 1





Table
1 to


Purchase
Agreement No. 3219


Aircraft
Delivery, Description, Price and Advance Payments















































[CONFIDENTIAL
PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH


THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]


















































AAL


48980-1F.TXT                                                                                        Boeing
Proprietary Page 2








Table
1 to


Purchase
Agreement No. 3219


Aircraft
Delivery, Description, Price and Advance Payments















































[CONFIDENTIAL
PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH


THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]


















































AAL


48980-1F.TXT                                                                                        Boeing
Proprietary Page 3





Table
1 to


Purchase
Agreement No. 3219


Aircraft
Delivery, Description, Price and Advance Payments















































[CONFIDENTIAL
PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH


THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]


















































AAL


48980-2F.TXT                                                                                        Boeing
Proprietary Page 1








Table
1 to


Purchase
Agreement No. 3219


Aircraft
Delivery, Description, Price and Advance Payments















































[CONFIDENTIAL
PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH


THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]


















































AAL


48980-2F.TXT                                                                                        Boeing
Proprietary Page 2








Table
1 to


Purchase
Agreement No. 3219


Aircraft
Delivery, Description, Price and Advance Payments















































[CONFIDENTIAL
PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH


THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]


















































AAL


48980-2F.TXT                                                                                        Boeing
Proprietary Page 3
## Settlement Part Program

    -  Dispute Resolution in the Administrative Process: Evaluation of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission Settlement Part Program 
    -  Settlement Part Evaluation: Supplemental Report 
    -  Settlement Part and Management and Administrative Initiatives to Support Settlement Part Implementation 
    -  Federal Register: Request for Public Comment on Settlement Part Program — 05/11/2012 
    -  Federal Register Notice: Settlement Part program — 4/4/2012 
    -  Federal Register Notice: Settlement Part program — 11/01/2011
#### Hott, Respondent, vs. West Allis Iron Works, Appellant.

*May 4*

June *1, 1915.*

*Master and,' servant: Action for services.*

In an action to recover for services, a judgment for plaintiff in tlie civil court, affirmed "by the circuit court, is *held*to he sustained by the evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: W. J. TubNee, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*F. C.*Weed, for the appellant.

Eor the respondent there was a brief by *Thomas A. Man-ningj*attorney, and *Wheeler &*Witte, of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Manning.*

Kerwin, J.

This action was commenced in the civil court of Milwaukee county to recover for services performed by plaintiff for defendant, and judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for $58.35, which judgment on appeal to the circuit court was affirmed.

*118Tbe court below rendered a decision in writing bolding that tbe evidence was sufficient to support tbe decision of tbe -civil court and that tbe conclusions arrived at by tbe civil court were correct, and affirmed its judgment. We agree with tbe court below and tbink tbe judgment should be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 10.2





Exhibit 10.2




ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT




This Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated October 15, 2010 by and between Catalytic
Solutions, Inc., a California corporation (“Assignor”), and Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (“Assignee”);



W I T N E S S E T H:




WHEREAS, Assignor and Aran Asset Management SA, Cycad Group, LLC, Emerald Energy Fund I LP,
EnerTech Capital Partners II L.P., ECP II Interfund L.P., Landolt & Cie., Sequoia Aggressive Growth
Fund, RockPort Capital Partners, L.P. and RP Co-Investment Fund I, L.P. entered into that certain
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2010 (the “Purchase Agreement”);



WHEREAS, the Purchase Agreement contemplates the assignment by Assignor, and the assumption by
Assignee, of all obligations of the Assignor under each of the Transaction Documents (as such term
is defined in the Purchase Agreement) (the “Obligations”) as a condition precedent to the Final
Closing (as such term is defined in the Purchase Agreement);



WHEREAS, Assignor and Aran Asset Management SA, Cycad Group, LLC, Emerald Energy Fund I LP,
EnerTech Capital Partners II L.P., ECP II Interfund L.P., Landolt & Cie., Sequoia Aggressive Growth
Fund, RockPort Capital Partners, L.P. and RP Co-Investment Fund I, L.P. have entered into that
certain Registration Rights Agreement of even date herewith; and



WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign and Assignee desires to assume the Obligations upon the
terms and conditions set forth herein;



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants set forth herein, and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereto agree as follows:



1. Assignment. Assignor does hereby convey, transfer, assign and deliver to Assignee,
and Assignee does hereby accept from Assignor, all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in and
to the Obligations, to have and to hold the Obligations hereby assigned, transferred and conveyed
unto Assignee, its successors and assigns, to its and their own use and behalf forever.



2. Assumption. From and after the Merger (as such term is defined in the Purchase
Agreement), Assignee shall undertake, assume and agree to perform, pay or discharge to
the extent not theretofore performed, paid or discharged the contractual and other obligations
of Assignor with respect to the Obligations.


 


 









 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective the date first
above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CATALYTIC SOLUTIONS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 



[Signature Page to Assignment and Assumption Agreement]
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on October 31, 2021
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
18-0758
RoadSafe Traffic Systems, Inc.
10/30/19
DFR
11/01/19
Closed

2
17-0737
UHS of Westwood Pembroke, Inc.
UHS of Delaware, Inc.
03/19/20
DFR
03/25/20
Closed

3
18-1451
Summit Contracting Group, Inc.
08/24/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

4
16-1713
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

5
16-1813
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

6
16-1872
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

7
17-0023
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

8
17-0279
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

9
16-1865
AJM Packaging Corporation
10/07/20
DFR
10/14/20
Closed

10
19-0723
Midwest Equipment Company
10/23/20
DFR
11/25/20
Closed

11
16-1587
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc. 
11/18/20
DFR
12/10/20
Closed

12 
18-1864
Henkels & McCoy, Inc.
12/07/20
DFR
12/23/20
Closed

13
18-0242
Onekey, LLC
02/05/21
DFR
02/18/21
Open

14 
18-0731
UHS of Delaware, Inc. and Premier Behavioral Health Solutions of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Suncoast Behavioral Health Center
05/19/21
DFR
05/21/21
Open

15
18-1287
First Marine, LLC
05/19/21
DFR
05/27/21
Open

16
18-1288
First Marine, LLC
05/19/21
DFR
05/27/21
Open

17
18-0701
Midvale Paper Box Company, Inc.
10/21/21
DFR



18
20-0762
CentiMark Corporation
10/27/21
DFR



19
20-0653
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
10/28/21
DFR



 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
# LIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22-0674 THE ESTATE OF FLORENCE TOSCH,

Plaintiffand Appellee, v. EDWARD KAHLE and CATHERINE KAHLE,

Defendants and Appellants. 

# r:D JUN 0 6 2023 Bowen G enwz_,od Clerk of S. rne Court !--C)rtt4ne.a ORDER

On November 28, 2022, Appellants Edward Kahle and Catherine Kahle filed a Notice of Appeal in this matter. In that Notice, they asserted that transcripts had been ordered in accordance with M. R. App. P. 8(3). They further filed a Notice ofTranscript Deemed Necessary for Appeal in which they asserted that arrangements for ordering and paying for the necessary transcripts had been undertaken. Under M. R. App. P. 9(1), the record on appeal, including necessary transcripts, shall be transmitted to this Court within 40 days unless certain conditions are met. On December 27, 2022, theNineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, granted court reporter Debra S. Kambel until February 24, 2023, to file the transcripts. On April 26, 2023, havingreceived notranscriptsnorrequests for extension oftime, this Court ordered Appellants to file a report on the status ofthis appeal on or before May 26, 2023. Appellants have not filed a status report nor have any other filings been made in this appeal. IT ISTHEREFORE ORDERED that this case isDISMISSEDWITHPREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy ofthis OrdertoAppellants and to all counsel ofrecord. 4
- N DATED this " day ofJune, 2023. 06/06/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0674

## / 1 U JetiL

Justices

2
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for June 2018

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month					25

2. Cases Added to Docket						  2

MasTec North America dba
MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.
No. 15-1574
Direction for Review on June 20, 2018

Texas Management Division, Inc.
No. 17-1861
Direction for Review on June 28, 2018

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket					 -1

Coleman Hammons Construction Co., Inc.
No. 17-0992
Decision on June 13, 2018

 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month					26
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H73]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Holden) come 
forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Mr. HOLDEN led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          33,000
<SECURITIES>                                    14,957
<RECEIVABLES>                                  266,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,029
<INVENTORY>                                    337,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               723,418
<PP&E>                                         565,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,109,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          475,974
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        427
<COMMON>                                         2,009
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,109,033
<SALES>                                      1,143,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,143,245
<CGS>                                          910,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  910,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    14
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,955
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,910
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,707)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (634)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,530
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72


</TABLE>
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 28685 1986
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for September 2021

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 17 

2. Cases Added to Docket 0

3. Cases Subtracted from Docket -1

Armstrong Utilities, Inc. d/b/a Armstrong Cable Services

No. 18-0034

Decision issued on September 24, 2021

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 16
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 4172** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TAVON MCPHAUL, a/k/a Block , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Marvin J. Garbis , Senior District Judge. ( 1:12

- cr - 00616

- MJG

- 3 )

Submitted : May 14, 2015 Decided: June 3, 2015

Before WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Beth M. Farber, HARRIS O’BRIEN, New York, New York, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Bonnie S. Greenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Benjamin M. Bloc k, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tavon McPhaul seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence after pleading guilty. McPhaul’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising the issue of whether McPhaul waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence, but concluding that he knowingly and intelligently did so and there are no meritorious gro unds for appeal. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal based in part on the appeal waiver. McPhaul was notified of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. “Plea bargains rest on contractual principles, and each party s hould receive the benefit of its bargain.” United States v. Blick , 408 F.3d 162, 173 (4th Cir. 2005) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “A defendant may waive the right to appeal his conviction and sentence so long as the waiver is knowing and voluntary.” United States v. Davis , 689 F.3d 349, 354 (4th Cir. 2012) (citing United States v. Marin , 961 F.2d 493, 496 (4th Cir. 1992)). We review the validity of an appeal waiver de novo “and will enforce the waiver if it is valid and the issue app ealed is within the scope of the waiver.” Id. at 354

- 55 (citing Blick , 408 F.3d at 168). Upon review of the plea agreement and the transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, we conclude that McPhaul knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appe al his conviction and3 sentence. Moreover, in accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the record for any potentially meritorious issues that might fall outside the scope of the waiver and have found none. Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal. This court requires that counsel inform his or her client, in writing, of his or her right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense w ith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# ~,~\~~o~~- 

# jff\~~-*,

GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS --------0-------- DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND NATURAL RESOURCES

45 Mars Hill, Frederiksted St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 00840-4474 

### Office of the Commissioner Telephone: (340) 773-10&2 Facsimile: (340) 173-1716
December 1, 2015 Judith A. Enck Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency, Reg ion 2 290 Broadway New York, NY 10007-1866 Re : Negative Declaration 40 CFR 60 Subpart MMMM Dear Administrator Enck: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40 Part 62-Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Deslqnated Facilities and Pollutants, grants the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to approve or disapprove state plans for the control of pollutants and facilities under section 111( d) and section 129 of the Clean Air Act, as applicable. Under Part 62, a state may submit a State Plan (SP), adopt a federal plan or submit a letter to EPA certifying that no deSignated facilities exist in the State

. The certification or negative declaration will be in lieu of a plan. In accordance with 40 CFR 62.06 and 40 CFR 60.23(b), the Department of Planning and Natural Resources-Division of Environmental Protection (DPNR-DEP) herby certifies that the United States Virgin Islands does not have any facilities subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart MMMM-Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units. If there are any questions or concerns, please have your staff contact Norman Williams, Director of DEP, at norman.williams@dpnr.vi.gov.

331 ;=. 10 1 0~lN O:) 

### : .t)'I: :m,OdS3Cl~O~ Z L ( '; ~ I : l ~

' i d 

## 'sn 

# ozz Hd ! i ~~G 5iJL cc: Richard Ruvo, Chief, Air Programs Branch 

# a31\13 ~ 3 ~