alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2369-E2370]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         TRIBUTE TO THE SUNY CORTLAND MEN'S CROSS COUNTRY TEAM

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. MICHAEL A. ARCURI

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. ARCURI. Madam Speaker, I rise today in recognition of the State 
University of New

[[Page E2370]]

York (SUNY) Cortland Men's Cross Country Team, which won its first ever 
national title on November 22. During the NCAA Division III 
Championships at Hanover College in Hanover, Indiana, the Cortland Red 
Dragons beat 31 competitors with a score of 80 points. The team solidly 
outpaced the second and third place finishers who scored 115 and 129 
points, respectively, and improved on their previous finishes of fourth 
in 2006 and third in 2007 to win this year's title.
  Four of the team's runners earned All-America honors by finishing in 
the top 35 competitors over the 8,000-meter course. Junior Seth DuBois 
finished seventh; senior Shamus Nally, 11th; senior Josh Henry, 15th: 
and junior Justin Wager, 28th.
  The team was led by first year head coach Steve Patrick and assistant 
coaches Kathryn Wagner and Jacob Smith. Coach Patrick was named the 
2008 Division III Men's Cross Country National Coach of the Year by the 
United States Track & Field and Cross Country Coaches Association 
(USTFCCCA).
  Overall, the win marks SUNY Cortland's 22nd national team title, 
including 16 NCAA crowns in seven different sports.
  Madam Speaker. I am honored to represent such skilled and hard-
working athletes in my district. Please join me in congratulating the 
team and wishing them the best of luck in their future athletic and 
scholarly pursuits.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Allied Security Innovations Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Anthony
Shupin, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





By:
                    /s/
      Anthony ShupinAnthony
      ShupinPresident,
      Chief Executive OfficerMay
      13, 2009
Submitted on appellant’s brief October 18,

reversed November 5, 1973

#### BRIDGES, *Respondent, v.*BRIDGES, *Appellant.*

515 P2d 427

William M. Sloan, Grants Pass, and Johnson, Sloan & Jordan, Grants Pass, for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

*276Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Tahzek, Judges.

SCHWAB, C. J.

Defendant wife appeals from an order of the circuit court modifying a decree of dissolution of marriage by deleting the provision for alimony.

The parties were married in 1949. In 1971, the parties signed a settlement agreement which contained a provision providing for the payment of $100 per month “as alimony and support.” The dissolution decree provided for alimony payments in the sum of $100 per month.1

The bases of Mr. Bridges’s motion to delete the alimony provision were that his income had decreased and that Mrs. Bridges had obtained employment. The record does not support these allegations. Mrs. Bridges was employed both at the time of the decree and the time of the modification hearing without any substantial change in income. Between the time of the decree and the time of the modification hearing Mr. Bridges’s monthly earnings increased by $49 per month.

 The real thrust of Mr. Bridges’s argument was that the provisions of the divorce decree for alimony and child support imposed too great a financial burden upon him. If so, he should have appealed from the decree. A motion for modification is not an acceptable *277substitute- for an appeal. *Verburg v. Verburg,*8 Or App 524, 495 P2d 35 (1972).

A party seeking a modification of a provision of a divorce decree relating to support must allege and prove some material change of circumstances subsequent to the decree. *Watson v. Watson,*251 Or 65, 67, 444 P2d 476 (1968); *Osterholme v. Osterholme,*13 Or App 73, 508 P2d 824 (1973).

Reversed.

1

 The decree also contained provisions for child support in the amount provided for in the settlement agreement. Those provisions are not at issue here. We note, however, that at the dissolution hearing the plaintiff husband alleged that reasonable amounts for both alimony and child support were those amounts which the decree provided should be paid.
Exhibit 10(i)

                        AMDAHL CORPORATION

                      1995 BONUS PROGRAM FOR
           OFFICERS, VICE PRESIDENTS, SENIORS AND KEYS

Principles:

1.   Maintain a tiered approach to bonus plans to reflect market
practice

2.   Raise the threshold at which bonuses begin to be paid

3.   Strengthen the link between performance and compensation by
trending salaries towards the 50th percentile and targeting base
salary plus bonus to the 75th percentile of the market

4.   Increase the bonus opportunity to make possible greater
variability in pay

5.   Make pre-tax profit, operating income or other financial
measures the determinant at target of 60 percent of bonus
opportunity for Seniors and Keys and 80 percent for Vice
Presidents and Officers

6.   Make performance against other operational goals the
determinant at target of 40 percent of bonus opportunity for
Seniors and Keys and 20 percent for Vice Presidents and Officers

7.   Persons managing or assigned to the various lines of
business may earn 60 percent of bonus based on their units'
operating income or other financial measures at target

8.   Persons managing or assigned to the corporate functions may
earn 60 percent of bonus based on corporate pre-tax income profit
at target


Bonus Eligible Population

Approximately nine percent of the company's employees would be
bonus eligible.  These employees have been assigned to various
levels of incentive participation based on competitive
positioning and internal organization.

<PAGE>
Incentive           Representative                Bonus
Plan Level          Participants                  Range

 2                  Sr. Officers                  0-100%
                    & LOB GM's
 
 3                  Other Officers                0-75%
                    & Senior VP's

 4                  Other VP's                    0-60%

 5                  Seniors                       0-30%

 6                  Keys                          0-15%
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10
- 17

- 00102
- CR
IN RE SHAWNA PHALENE JOHNSON

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Shawna Johnson was convicted of the misdemeanor offense of possession of marijuana in an amount of four ounces or less but more than two ounces

. We affirmed
her conviction on March 1 7 , 2016. See Johnson v. State , No. 10

- 14

- 00263

- CR, 2016 WL 1072610 (Tex. App.

— Waco Mar. 17, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Johnson has now filed a document requesting that we please “forgive” her sentence as “time served.” Johnson asks that we release her from her obligations to McLennan County and, specifically, that the suspension on her driver’s license be
removed

. Johnson’s request is a matter within the exclusive ju risdiction of the Board of
Pardons and Paroles. See Haliburton v. State , 578 S.W.2d 726, 728 (Tex. Crim. App. [PanelIn re Johnson Page 2

Op.] 1979). We therefore construe the document filed by Johnson as a petition for writ of
mandamus requesting that we compel the Board of Pardons and Paroles to act according
to her wishes

. 1 However, we have no mandamus jurisdiction over the Board of Pardons
and Paroles. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221 (West 2004 ); In re Fowler , No. 14

- 15

- 00712

- CR, 2015 WL 5092623, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 27, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Accordingly, Johnson’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justic e Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition dismissed Opi nion delivered and filed May 3, 2017 Do not publish [OT06]

1 Johnson’s filing has many deficiencies. It lack s proof of service; a copy of all documents presented to the Court must be served on all parties and must contain proof of service. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.5, 52.2. The filing also lack s most of the contents required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 52. Id. 52.3, 52.7. It do es not include the certification required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3(j). Id. 52.3(j). It also lack s a record. Id. 52.7. To expedite this matter, we invoke Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 to suspend these requirements. Id. 2.
----

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 28 June 2004

in Case C-445/02 P: Glaverbel SA v OHIM (1)

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Community trade mark - Design applied to the surface of goods - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character)

(2004/C 228/33)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-445/02 P: Glaverbel SA, established in Brussels (Belgium), (Lawyer: S. Möbus) — appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2002 in Case T-36/01 Glaverbel v OHIM (glass-sheet surface) [2002] ECR II-3887, seeking to have that judgment set aside in so far as the Court of First Instance held that the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) did not infringe Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) by adopting its decision of 30 November 2000 refusing to register a design applied to the surface of glass products as a Community trade mark (Case R 137/2000-1), the other party to the proceedings being: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Schneider and R. Thewlis), defendant at first instance — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta and J. Makarczyk, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 28 June 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

----

(1)OJ C 31 of 8.2.2003.

----
**Exhibit 21****THE ALLIED DEFENSE GROUP, INC.****LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**     1. ARC Europe, S.A., a Belgian Corporation          Wholly-owned and majority owned Belgian subsidiaries of ARC    Europe S.A.           A. MECAR S.A.           B. Sedachim S.I., S.A.           C. VSK Electronics N.V.          (1) Belgian Automation Units, N.V           (2) Intelligent Data Capturing Systems, N.V.           (3) VIGITEC, S.A.           (4) Tele Technique Generale, S.A.           (5) Control Monitor Systems, Inc.          D. Hendrickx N.V.     2. Allied Research Corporation Limited, a U.K. Corporation     3. Energa Corporation     4. News/ Sports Microwave Rental, Inc.     5. Titan Dynamics Systems, Inc.     6. SeaSpace Corporation     7. MECAR USA, Inc.     8. Allied Technology, LLC
E-2
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By /s/ William S. Ayer
   -----------------------------------
William S. Ayer
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
May 20, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                     MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward B. Lipkin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of National Property
Analysts Master Limited Partnership;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: July 14, 2006
By: EBL&S, Inc., its managing general partner
By: /s/ Edward B. Lipkin
    ------------------------------
Name: Edward B. Lipkin
Title: President
March 19, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GARY ISHMAEL BOLIN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00521

- CR V. NO. 14

- 14

- 0052 2

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observanc e.
| Official Journalof the European Union | ISSN 1725-2423C 270EVolume 50**13 November 2007** |
| --- | --- |

Official Journalof the European Union

ISSN 1725-2423C 270EVolume 50**13 November 2007**

| English edition | | Information and Notices | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| |
| Notice No | Contents | page | |
| | | III *Preparatory Acts* | |
| | | **COUNCIL** |
| 2007/C 270 E/01 | Common Position (EC) No 14/2007 of 20 September 2007 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC | 1 |

English edition

Information and Notices

---

Notice No

Contents

page

III *Preparatory Acts*

**COUNCIL**

2007/C 270 E/01

Common Position (EC) No 14/2007 of 20 September 2007 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC

1

| **EN** | |
| --- | --- |

**EN**
Exhibit 32(a)

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification

 

I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-Q of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m            or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp.

 

 

 

| Date: May 8, 2009                     |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                  |   |   |
| /s/ Mary B. Halsey                    |   |   |
| Mary B. Halsey                        |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |

 

 

Page 21

 

 

----

Exhibit 32(b)

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification

 

I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-Q of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m            or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp.

 

 

| Date: May 8, 2009                          |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                       |   |   |
| /s/ Robert Lee Whitehead                   |   |   |
| Robert Lee Whitehead                       |   |   |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)              |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |

 

 

Page 22
Exhibit 4.2


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated October 6, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2037 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-239864) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


	 	/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


 


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 6, 2020
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2367-E2368]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        TRIBUTE TO FRANK NELSON

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. KEN CALVERT

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. CALVERT. Madam Speaker, I rise today to honor and pay tribute to 
an individual whose dedication and contributions to the community of 
Corona, California are exceptional. Corona has been fortunate to have 
dynamic and dedicated community leaders who willingly and unselfishly 
give their time and talent and make their communities a better place to 
live and work. Frank Nelson is one of these individuals.
  Frank Nelson has been a Realtor in the Corona area for 17 years. He 
is the current

[[Page E2368]]

Board President for the Inland Gateway Association of Realtors and he 
also served as President in 1998. Frank has served the Realtors as the 
Federal Political Coordinator and State Director for 14 years, and is 
the 14th district Vice President.
  Frank has also served as Chairman of Land Use and Vice Chairman of 
Property Management and Land Use for the California Association of 
Realtors. He is a member of Federal Issues, Local Government Relations, 
and served on a special task force for Private Transfer Tax and 
presently is serving on the Department of Real Estates for rewriting 
questions for the California Department of Real Estate license exam.
  I also have a personal connection with Frank. He lived across the 
street from my mother, Marsha, and would often look in on her while I 
was away. Frank epitomized a good neighbor who was always there to lend 
a helping hand.
  Frank's tireless passion for community service has contributed 
immensely to the betterment of the community of Corona, California. I 
am proud to call Frank a fellow community member, American and friend. 
I know that many community members are grateful for his service and 
salute him as his term ends as the Inland Gateway Association of 
Realtors Board President.

                          ____________________
```