alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20666 and #20667; LOUISIANA Disaster Number LA-20007]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-4817-DR), dated September 23, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Francine.                    

# DATES:

Issued on November 7, 2024.

*Incident Period:*                         September 9, through September 12, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         November 22, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         June 23, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Louisiana, dated September 23, 2024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Parishes:*                     St. James, St. John The Baptist.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro C. Contreras,

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-26652 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT

CASE NUMBER: P04-0153

RELATED CASES

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL: 1-2 3

KEYWORDS: AQUATOX-A,C, LUNG

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT:

FATE: MW184 with 48% and 52% with mp = 1400 E C (M) and needs to be a very fine powder based on intended use and with mean vp < 1.0E-6 mm Hg or torr at 25 E C (P) bp >> 1400 C (P) H < 1.0E-8 (P) log Koc > 4.5 (P) log fish BCF = 0.50 (P) log fish (carp) BCF for <= 1.7 (M) [ ];

POTW removal = 0% based on uncer tainty; however, if dissocia tion occurs, then removal of PO4 has been measured by the OW = 32% (M); if dissociation does not occur, then PMN will act like a fine particle in the PO TW and in the aquatic environment time for complete ultimate aerobic biodegradation is uncertain, thus > months as worst case sorption to soils and sediments is uncertain and depends on the degree of dissociation

PBT Potential: P3B1T1 with B1 based on fish *CEB FATE: migration to ground water is uncertain and depends on the degree of dissociation

HEALTH: Absorption nil thru skin, poor thru lung and GI tract based on physical/chemical properties and analogs;

concern for lung toxicity and l ung cancer if inhaled due to nature of PMN substance; if dissolution occurs, the concern for is low;

low to moderate concern for toxicity; *CEB HEALTH: Exposures to humans: inhalation

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are: fish 96-h LC50 = 0.060 P toxicity daphnid 48-h LC50 = 6.0 P toxicity green algal 96-h EC50 c = 0.060 P stimulation of growth by algal 96-h EC50 c = 0.310 P toxicity by ionfish chronic value = 0.006 P daphnid ChV = 0.600 P algal ChV = 0.020 P Predictions are based on SAR-nearest analog an alysis for soluble compounds with MW adjustment and test data for inorganic with regard to eutrophication in freshwater environments; ; MW184; ; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and

mean measured concentrati ons; hardness <150.0 mg/L as; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; high concern for toxicity from the Y high concern for eutrophication from the

assessment factor = 10.0 CC for = 0.001 mg/L (ppm) CC for = 0.020 mg/L (ppm) *CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water;

SAT Co-chair: Vince Nabholz, 564.8909
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, DavidA. Berg, Chief Executive Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.          The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended August 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.          Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 29th day of November,2007.

 
|   | By:                            | /s/ David A. Berg |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|-------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Name: David A. Berg            |              |
|   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |              |
|        |                                |                   |        |        |  |

 

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months        Six Months
                                                Ended              Ended
                                          September 30, 1997  September 30, 1997
                                          ------------------  ------------------
<S>                                             <C>                 <C>
Net Income                                       $ 29,279              67,540
                                                 ========             =======
 
Weighted average shares outstanding               229,276             230,158
 
Reduction for common shares not yet released by
  Employee Stock Ownership Plan                    14,803              14,969
 
Common stock equivalents due to dilutive effect
  of stock options                                  *                    *
                                                ---------             -------
 
Total weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding                         214,473             215,189
                                                 ========             =======
 
Primary earnings per share                       $    .14                 .32
                                                 ========             =======
 
Total weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding for primary
  computation                                     214,473             215,189
 
Additional dilutive shares using the end of
  period market value versus the average market
  value when applying the treasury stock method     **                   **
                                                 --------             -------
 
Total weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding for fully diluted
  computation                                     214,473             215,189
                                                 ========             =======
 
Fully diluted earnings per share                 $    .14                 .32
                                                 ========             =======
 
</TABLE>

*  Note: The fair value of the stock at September 30, 1997 was $10.00 per share,
         the same as the stock option exercise price; therefore no common stock
         equivalents are computed.

** Note: If average share price is greater than ending price, use average price
         for both primary and fully diluted calculation. This adjustment does
         not apply because the average price and the ending price at September
         30, 1997 are the same as the option exercise price of $10.00 per
         share.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 66 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.66

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
    savings arrangements established by States for non-governmental 
                               employees.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Savings 
Arrangements Established by States for Non-Governmental Employees'' 
(published at 81 Fed. Reg. 59464 (August 30, 2016)), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H76]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Oregon (Mr. DeFazio) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  (Mr. DeFAZIO addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.)

                          ____________________
```
August 14, 2015 United States Department ofTransportation Federal Aviation Administration DocketManagement System 1200 NewJersey Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20590 Filed in www.regulations.gov, Docket FAA 2015-2042 

# AkinGump STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP

GREGORY S. WALDEN +1 202.887.4213/fax: +1 202.887.4288 gswalden@akingump.com

Re: Ascend Aerials LLC Petition for Amendmentto Exemption 12322, under Section 333 oftheFAA Modernization and Reform Act, 49 U.S.C. 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, to add the FreeFly AltaUnmanned Aircraft System On behalf of Ascend Aerials LLC ("Ascend Aerials"), we hereby seek an amendment to Exemption 12322, granted August 4, to allow Ascend Aerials to operate the FreeFly Alta hexacopter unmanned aircraft vehicle and system ("UAV" and "UAS"), to provide the same services authorized in Exemption 12322. To date, two companies have received a Section 333 exemption from the FAA to operate the FreeFly Alta: CopelandRED LLC (Docket 2015-0956) obtained Exemption #12103 on July 21, 2015; Samuel Fleishman (Docket 2015-1624) obtained Exemption #12362 on August 6, 2015. 1 Ascend Aerials will comply with the conditions and limitations as set forth in Exemption 12322. Accordingly, we respectfully ask the FAA to grant this petition in summary fashion, and obviate Federal Register publication and public comment.

uie Northern
1We believe the FAA is in possession ofFreeFiy's Aircraft Flight Manual for the Alta hexacopter UAV. Upon request, we will provide a copy ofthis Manual.

RobertS. Strauss Building 1 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. 1 Washington , D.C. 20036-1564 1202.887.4000 1 fax 202.887.4288 1akmgump com
FA A PAR T 1 6 AIRPOR

T PROCEEDINGS DOCKE T ' i,.» t

^ « . «,, * FEDERA L AVIATIO

N ADMINISTRATIO

N WASHINGTON , DC i Docke t No . 16-08-0 5 ALCA , Inc. , Cylinde

r Shop , Inc. , Suncoas t Aviation , Aircraf

t Part s an d Nationa l Aviation , Complainants , vs . Miami-Dad

e County , Florid a Respondent . 

# F l

I P

—J, —^ O / MOTIO N FO R EXTENSIO N O F TIM E T O FIL E REPL Y BRIE F Petitioners , hereb y file s thi s Motion fo r Extensio n of

Tim e to Fil e Reply Brie f

an d in suppor t thereo f woul d show : 1 . Petitioner s hav e file

d aPar t 1 6 Complain

t agains t Miam i Dad e County ; 2 . The Count

y filed it s respons e afte

r asevera l mont h dela y an d receive d asevera

l mont h tim e extension ; 3 . The Reply Brie f

will addres s issue s speirmin g alength y time perio d and involvin g multipl e partie s an

d factua l an d lega l issues ; 4 . Undersigne d counsel i s currently preparin g fo r severa l trial s and severa

l appeals ; 5 . It i s requeste d tha

t undersigne d counsel receiv e a n extensio n of

up to Novembe

r 1,2008 , to file th e Repl

y Brief ;Michae l A , Pizzi , Jr. , Esq . Florid aBa r No . 07954 5 

### CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I HEREB Y CERTIF Y tha t acopy o f th e abov e Motio n fo

r Extensio n of

Tim e to Fil e Repl y Brie f wa s mailed/FAXe d to : Offic e of th e Chie f Counsel Attn : FA A Par t 1 6 Airpor t Proceeding s Docke t 16-08-0 5 Roo m925 , Federa

l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , SW Washington , DC 2059 1 Jennife r Trock , Esq . Pillsbur y Winthro p Sha w Pittman , LL

P 230 0 N . Street , N

W Washington , D C 2003 7

By : ichae l A . Pizzi , Jr. , Esq . 

# 1Respectfull y submitted , MICHAE L A . PIZZI , Jr. , P.A . Attorne y fo r

Defendan t 1527 1 N W 60 * Avenu e Miam i Lakes , F l 3301 6 Phone : 30 5 23 1 212 1 FAX : 30 5 23 1 212 3 E-mail : mpi7y.ijr(%vahoo.co m By:_ 

# / ^ 4 "Michael A

^ Pizzi , Jn , Es q Florid aBa r No . 07954 5 

### CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I HEREB Y CERTIF Y tha t acopy of th e abov e Motio n fo

r Extensio n of

Time to Fil e Repl y Brie f wa s mailed/FAXe d to : Offic e o f th e Chief Counsel Attn : FA A Par t 1 6 Airpor t Proceeding s Docke t 16-08-0 5 Roo m925 , Federa

l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , SW Washington , D C 2059 1 Jennife r Trock , Esq . Pillsbur y Winthro p Sha w Pittman , LL

P 230 0 N . Street , N

W Washington , D C 2003 7 

### By : ichae l A . Pizzi , Jr. , Esq . 

# n
#### ROWLAND GOSS and others v. JAMES WALLER, Ex’r.

*Pleading*— Demurrer.

A demurrer “ that the complaint states no cause of action whatever” against the defendant, will be disregarded. It must distinctly specify the grounds of objection to the complaint. The Code, $240.

*{Love*v. *Commissioners,*64 N. C., 706; *Bank*v. *Bogle,*86 N. C., 203, cited and approved).

Special PROCEEDING- against the defendant executor of Nancy Waller, for an account and the payment of legacies bequeathed to the plaintiffs, commenced before the clerk and heard on appeal at Fall Term, 1883, of Granville Superior Court, before *MacRae, J.*

The defendant demurred to the petition as follows: “That the petition or complaint states no cause of action whatever against him. Wherefore he demands judgment that he go without day and recover of the petitioners his costs of action.”

On the first day of March, 1873, .the clerk gave judgment *150overruling the demurrer, from which judgment the defendant: appealed to the judge of the fith judicial district, and at fall term, 1883, the case was heard, before His Honor, who sustained the ruling of the clerk, and' adjudged that plaintiffs recover of defendant and his sureties the costs of, appeal, and' directed the ruling and-his opinion to be certified, &c. From,this judgment the defendant appealed to this court.

*Mr. T. B.*Venable, for plaintiffs..

*Messrs. J. B. Batchelor*and *L. G. Edwards,*for defendant.

Ashe, J.

There is no error in the ruling of His Plonor-The statute provides that the demurrer shall distinctly specify the grounds of objection to the complaint, and unless it does so,, it may be disregarded. The Code, §240 — same as C. C. P.,. §96. This section has received judicial construction.

In *Love*v. *Commissioners,*64 N. C., 706, where the court held “ that a demurrer under the C. C. P. differs from the former-demurrer *at law*in this: Every demurrer, whether for substance or form, must distinctly specify the ground of objection, to the complaint, or be disregarded. It differs from the former demurrer in equity, in that the judgment overruling.it is final and decides the case, unless the pleadings are amended.” Chief-Justice PeaksoN, who delivered the opinion, said, “it is so easy to specify the ground of objection that the court is not disposed to relax the rule. *There is no use in having a scribe unless you. cut up to it.”*This decision was cited with approval in-the more recent case of *Bank*v. *Bogle,*85 N. C., 203.

The judgment of the judge of the superior court must be affirmed, and this opinion certified to the superior court of Gran-ville county, that the same may be certified to the clerk of the superior court with directions to proceed according to law. The appellant must pay the costs of the appeal.

No error. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,153
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,194
<PP&E>                                          58,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,818
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,755
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,730
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,387)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (974)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (102)
<CHANGES>                                        (177)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,253)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
|    |                                                                                                      |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cheniere Energy, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |
|                                            |
| /s/ Neal A. Shear                               |
| Neal A. ShearInterim Chief Executive Officer of |
| Cheniere Energy, Inc.                           |
# Memorandum
U.s. Departmentof Transportation OfficeoftheSecretary ofTransportation Subject: Notice ofCommunication in Docket: DOT-OST

-2008-0252 Joint Application of: AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., BRITISH AIRWAYS 

### /L,**,~INNAIR** 0 IBERIA LlNEAS AEREAS DE

. E PANA, S
.., an YAL JORDANIAN AIRLINES Date: 

# / /**22-/~ I~Plyto**  Attn. of: To: Chief, Dockets
In accordance with Departmentrules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the following communication. OnJanuary 13,2010, I met withJose Blanco L6pez, Spain'sMinister for Development. During our meeting, Minister Blanco stated thathe wanted to leavebehind a briefpaperregarding the application ofIberia Air Lines, together with other members ofthe oneworld alliance, for antitrust immunity. Thatpaperis provided as an attachment to this memorandum. I did not engage in any substantive discussion onthis matter withMinister Blanco. Pleaseplace this memorandum and the accompanying attachment inthe appropriate file and in the Docket.

AttachmentMINISTERIO DE FOMENTO Encuentro Espana (Presidencia Consejo UE)-EE. UU Washington, 13 de enero de 2010



### (Asunto al margen de la reunion formal) Sr. Secretario, me gustaria aprovechar la confianza que mantenemos para comentar brevemente con Ud. el asunto de 

### la solicitud de inmunidad antitrust por la Alianza OneWorld (de la que forma parte Iberia). Soy plenamente consciente de su posici6n en este asunto y 

### S9 que el tema esta en manos de las autoridades competentes de su Departamento. Por eso, no es mi intenci6n pedirle un pronunciamiento al respecto durante nuestro encuentro de hoy.

13 I PASEO DE LA CASTElLANA, 67 28071 MADRIDMINISTERIO DE FOMENTO EncuentroEspana (Presidencia Consejo UE)-EE. UU Washington, 13 de enero de 2010



### No obstante, no qUiero desaprovechar esta oportunidad para subrayar una vez mas nuestro interes por este asunto, e insistir en la importancia de una decisi6n a la mayor brevedad en este expediente. Como sabe, la concesi6n de la inmunidad antitrust a OneWorld es un compromiso de la 1 8 

### fase y por 

### 10 tanto es un requisito imprescindible para la UE, y especialmente para Espana, para poder concluir la 28 

### fase del Acuerdo de Servicios Aereos, que ahora negociamos. En cualquier caso, estoy convencido de que en breve lIegara el pronunciamiento del Departamento de Transportes que Ud. dirige, y con ello desaparecera este eventual peligro para la negociacion de la 28 

### fase, que tendra una cita importante en febrero en Madrid.

14 PASEO DE LA CASTElLANA, 67 28071 f,IIAORID