alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 67 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 

savings arrangements established by qualified State political subdivisions 

for non-governmental employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Mr. FRANCIS ROONEY of Florida (for himself, Mr. WALBERG, and Ms. FOXX) 

submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 

relating to savings arrangements established by qualified 

State political subdivisions for non-governmental employees. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Labor relating to ‘‘Savings Arrangements Es5 tablished by Qualified State Political Subdivisions for 

6 Non-Governmental Employees’’ (published at 81 Fed. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 67 IH 

1 Reg. 92639 (December 20, 2016)), and such rule shall 

2 have no force or effect. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on June 30, 2023
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
18-0701
Midvale Paper Box Company, Inc.
10/21/21
DFR
11/09/21
Closed

2
20-0653
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
10/28/21
DFR
11/05/21
Closed

3
19-0622
Anthony Marano Co.
02/10/22
DFR
02/16/22
Closed

4
20-0541
Harvey Builders d/b/a Harvey Cleary Builders
03/03/22
DFR
03/11/22
Closed

5
21-0432
Ariana Murrell-Rosario d/b/a Liberty Tax Service
07/01/22
DFR
07/13/22
Closed

6
20-1212
Roy Rock, LLC
07/14/22
DFR
07/15/22
Closed

7
20-0232
U.S. Ceiling Corp.
09/29/22
DFR
10/05/22
Closed

8
21-0794
U.S. Postal Service – Canovanas Post Office
11/16/22
DFR
11/18/22
Closed

9
20-0032
UHS of Fuller, Inc.,
UHS of Delaware, Inc.
03/02/23
DFR
03/20/23
Open

10
21-0295
Poinsett Hutterian Brethren, Inc.
03/16/23
DFR
03/27/23
Open

11
20-1437
K.M. Davis Contracting Co., Inc.
03/23/23
DFR
03/31/23
Open

12
17-0053
Joon, LLC d/b/a Ajin USA
03/23/23
DFR
03/29/23
Open

13
20-0559
MasTec Services, Inc.
04/04/23
DFR
04/06/23
Open

14
19-1667
A Crane Rental LLC
04/27/23
DFR
04/27/23
Open

15
19-1054
Shawn D. Purvis d/b/a/ Purvis Home Improvement Co., Inc. (an individual) and Purvis Home Improvement Co., Inc. (in the alternative)
06/29/23
DFR
06/30/23
Open

16
19-1056
Shawn D. Purvis d/b/a/ Purvis Home Improvement Co., Inc. (an individual) and Purvis Home Improvement Co., Inc. (in the alternative)
06/29/23
DFR
06/29/23
Open

17
19-1905
Shawn D. Purvis d/b/a/ Purvis Home Improvement Co., Inc. (an individual) and Purvis Home Improvement Co., Inc. (in the alternative)
06/29/23
DFR
06/29/23
Open

 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 49 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior relating 

to ‘‘Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the 

Department of the Interior relating to ‘‘Non-Subsistence 

Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure 

Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of the Interior relating to ‘‘Non-Subsistence 

5 Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure 

6 Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska’’ (81 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 49 IH 

1 Fed. Reg. 52248 (August 5, 2016)), and such rule shall 

2 have no force or effect. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
1. AML Emergency or 

Problem Identified

1a. Tribal AML Program 

Emergency Status 

Evaluation

2. With non-emergency status, Tribal 

AML program issues reclamation 

evaluation and project review

3. OSMRE project review

APPENDIX 4.2-8

Indian Lands Emergency and Non-Emergency AML Reclamation Process

OSMRE evaluates significance 

of impacts and prepares 

appropriate NEPA 

documentation

OSMRE makes a finding and 

prepares a decision 

document

OSMRE assesses the 

environmental review in the 

ATP request 

1b. With emergency 

status, OSMRE issues 

briefing paper, emergency 

declaration, and 

Authorization to Proceed

4. OSMRE issues 

Authorization to Proceed

5. Tribe spends AML funds 

on approved project

6. AML site is 

reclaimed

Step 1

Other Regulatory 

Processes

Step 2

Other Regulatory 

Processes

Step 3

Other Regulatory 

Processes

Step 4

Other Regulatory 

Processes

3. CE, EA, 

or EIS Determination

(See Chapter 2)

4. Identify 

Alternatives

(if any) and Study 

Methodologies

7. Alternative 

Selection and 

Decision 

Document

1. Identify the 

Proposal and Need

2.Identify Federal 

Action(s)

5. Complete 

Studies/Technical 

Reports 

DEIS or EA

6. NEPA 

Document and 

Preferred Alternative

NEPA Compliance 

Complete

1c. Emergency abatement 

may occur concurrent or 

prior to completion of NEPA

(See Chapter 3.3)

Start NEPA 

Review

(Data Collection 

Complete)

Note: This flowchart only illustrates an approval process. An applicant can withdraw 

the proposal, and/or OSMRE can request additional information, and/or not approve 

the proposal at anytime throughout the review process.

Legend

Beginning or End Point Task Direction Arrows

Required Project Tasks Iterative Task Direction Arrows

State or Tribal Program Responsibility

OSMRE Program Responsibility

OSMRE NEPA Review Tasks

OSMRE Tasks for Other Regulatory Processes 

Timing Guide in relation to Tasks

Milestone and Decisions Points

NEPA Schedule Guide

Guidelines for Milestones and Decisions 

Point Timing (Note: Approximately located as a 

sliding scale based on specific project circumstances)
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 233 (Monday, December 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 75876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)

AGENCY: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference call of the State 
Energy Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463; 86 Stat.770) requires that public notice of these meetings 
be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, January 19, 2012. 3:30 p.m.-4 p.m. EST.
    To receive the call-in number and passcode, please contact the 
Board's Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at the address or phone number 
listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gil Sperling, STEAB Designated Federal 
Officer, Senior Management Technical Advisor, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 1000 
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585. Phone (202) 287-1644.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
Assistant Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable 
Energy regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative 
policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's responsibilities as 
designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 
1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Welcome new members to the Board, review and 
update accomplishment of STEAB's Task Forces since the November meeting 
in Knoxville, TN, review the revised priorities of the STEAB, and 
provide an update to the Board on routine business matters and other 
topics of interest.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Gil Sperling at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must 
be received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will 
be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the 
Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB Web site: http://www.steab.org.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on November 28, 2011.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-31120 Filed 12-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H76]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Sherman) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  (Mr. SHERMAN addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.)

                          ____________________
```
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall

Page 1 of 2

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 109 

March 23, 1989 

Patrick T. Walker, Director

Division of Mining and Reclamation 

State of South Carolina 

Land Resources Conservation Commission 

2221 Devine Street, Suite 222 

Columbia, South Carolina 29205 

TOPIC: DURATION OF MINING PERMITS FOR NON-FUEL MINES

INQUIRY: What is the normal duration of mining permits for non-fuel mines (1 year, 5 year, 

life of mine, etc.), renewal procedures (automatic, administrative review, technical review, etc.) 

and any fees associated with permit renewals?

SEARCH RESULTS: Research was conducted in the state codes in LEXIS. Permitting and 

renewal information was identified for 20 states (the current codes for 30 states are presently 

available in LEXIS). 

States issue prospecting or mining permits for periods anywhere from one to 20 years. There is a 

similar diversity among the states in the term of renewed permits, renewal fees and the 

administrative and reporting requirements attached to the renewal procedures. Copies of the 

statues and regulations identified are attached for your review.

ATTACHMENTS

Statutes and regulations are enclosed for the following states:

A. Alaska 

B. Arkansas 

C. California 

D. Delaware 

E. Indiana 

F. Iowa 

G. Maryland 

H. Minnesota 

I. Missouri 

J. Nebraska 

K. Nevada 

L. New Mexico 

M. New York 

N. North Carolina 
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall

Page 2 of 2

O. Ohio 

P. Tennessee 

Q. Virginia 

R. West Virginia 

S. Wisconsin 

T. Wyoming 

PLEASE NOTE: The material provided was the result of a general overview of permit 

information on LEXIS. If a more in-depth and specific survey is required, please let us know.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 694 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-365, K2025-363.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27136 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# Official Journal L 292/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 292 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6213 November 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 292

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6213 November 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2019/1897 of 8 November 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the Republic of Finland, of the European Economic and Social Committee | 1 |
| | * | Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2019/1898 of 8 November 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the Hellenic Republic, of the European Economic and Social Committee | 2 |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2019/1899 of 8 November 2019 appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Kingdom of Spain, of the Committee of the Regions | 3 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1900 of 12 November 2019 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2019) 8161)

   (
  1
  ) | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2019/1897 of 8 November 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the Republic of Finland, of the European Economic and Social Committee

1

*

Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2019/1898 of 8 November 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the Hellenic Republic, of the European Economic and Social Committee

2

*

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1899 of 8 November 2019 appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Kingdom of Spain, of the Committee of the Regions

3

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1900 of 12 November 2019 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2019) 8161)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2019) 8161)

1

4

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 82 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the final rule of the Bureau of Land Management 

relating to ‘‘Onshore Oil and Gas Operations; Federal and Indian Oil 

and Gas Leases; Measurement of Oil’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mr. WESTERMAN (for himself, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. CRAMER) 

submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the 

Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Onshore Oil 

and Gas Operations; Federal and Indian Oil and Gas 

Leases; Measurement of Oil’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Onshore Oil and 

5 Gas Operations; Federal and Indian Oil and Gas Leases; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 82 IH 

1 Measurement of Oil’’ (81 Fed. Reg. 81462 (November 17, 

2 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Conrad D. Clement, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Featherlite, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 12, 2005 |  | /s/ Conrad D. Clement  
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer



24
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of J. O.G.A.

, J.A.G.A., * From the 118 th District Court

D.O.G.

, and R.G., children, of Howard County,

Trial Court No. 53660

.

No. 11

- 20

- 00 2 62

- C V * May 6 , 20 2 1

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that th ere is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

order of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed.
# Official Journal C 91/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 91 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6023 March 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 91

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6023 March 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2017/C 91/01 | Opinion No 1/2017 (pursuant to Article 322, TFEU) concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002, Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1305/2013, (EU) No 1306/2013, (EU) No 1307/2013, (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014 and (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Decision No 541/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council — Revision of the ‘Financial Regulation’ — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 ( OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1 ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2017/C 91/01

Opinion No 1/2017 (pursuant to Article 322, TFEU) concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002, Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1305/2013, (EU) No 1306/2013, (EU) No 1307/2013, (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014 and (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Decision No 541/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council — Revision of the ‘Financial Regulation’ — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 ( OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1 )

(pursuant to Article 322, TFEU)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN