alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 101 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 101

   To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct 
  reviews of certain budget requests of the President for the medical 
          care accounts of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct 
  reviews of certain budget requests of the President for the medical 
          care accounts of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Healthcare Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              MEDICAL CARE BUDGET SUBMISSIONS.

    Section 4 of the Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and 
Transparency Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-81; 38 U.S.C. 117 note) is 
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 4. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              MEDICAL CARE BUDGET SUBMISSION.

    ``(a) Review of Budget Submission; Reports.--For each of fiscal 
years 2018, 2019, and 2020, the Comptroller General of the United 
States shall--
            ``(1) review the budget requests for the medical care 
        accounts of the Department of Veterans Affairs in the budget 
        request of the President submitted pursuant to section 1105 of 
        title 31, United States Code; and
            ``(2) submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs, 
        Appropriations, and the Budget of the Senate and the House of 
        Representatives a report or reports on the results of each such 
        review.
    ``(b) Timing and Scope of Reports.--In determining the timing and 
scope for the submittal of the report or reports required under 
subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall consult with the 
Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and the House of 
Representatives.
    ``(c) Medical Care Accounts.--In this section, the term `medical 
care accounts of the Department of Veterans Affairs' means the 
following medical care accounts of the Veterans Health Administration, 
Department of Veterans Affairs account:
            ``(1) Medical Services.
            ``(2) Medical Support and Compliance.
            ``(3) Medical Facilities.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40577 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICTOR MANUEL MENDOZA-OCHOA, also known as Tomas Claro-Alfaro, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-01-CR-754-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Victor Manuel Mendoza-Ochoa appeals from his guilty-plea conviction of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. He contends, for the first time on appeal, that 21 U.S.C. § 841 was rendered unconstitutional by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because drug types and quantities should be treated as elements of the offense of possession with intent to distribute. Mendoza concedes that his argument runs counter to this court’sNo. 02-40577 -2- caselaw; he raises the issue to preserve it for Supreme Court review. Because Mendoza did not raise his Apprendi issue in the district court, his contention is reviewed under the plain-error standard. United States v. Vasquez , 298 F.3d 354, 356 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 546 (2002). Apprendi did not render 21 U.S.C. § 841 facially unconstitutional. Id . at 360. Mendoza has not shown error, plain or otherwise.
AFFIRMED.
**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**

**[Electronic filing].**

This is to certify that service of the Joint Notification of Settlement filed in the Commission’s E-File System was also simultaneous served by email attachment to the parties listed below on ______________________.

**[Self-Represented party exempted from electronic filing].**

This is to certify that a copy of the Joint Notification of Settlement was served by first class, postage prepaid, U.S. Mail to the parties listed below on ______________________.

*___/s/______________________*

Name     Title

Company / Firm Name / Office of the Solicitor

Street Address

City, State, Zip Code

Email Address
#### Badger State Bank of Milwaukee, Respondent, vs. Finkler Motor Car Company, Inc., Appellant.

*September 12*

October *9, 1934.*

*164For the appellant there was a brief by *Julius 0. Roehl,*and oral argument by *Harry G. Slater,*both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Gians & Gians*and *Elroy J.*Ruehl, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Victor H. Gians.*

Fairchild, J.

The only subject for consideration upon this appeal is whether or not the Finkler Motor Car Company, Inc., intended to waive its right, if any it had, so far as John H. Fink and the bank are concerned, to pay Anna Fink’s back salary in stock.

Intent to abandon a known right may appear conclusively as a legal result of conduct as well as by the existence of actual and expressed intent. *Somers v. Germania Nat. Bank,*152 Wis. 210, 138 N. W. 713. Anna Fink’s account was never charged with the issue to her of any stock. The correspondence between Fink’s attorney and the Finkler Motor Car Company, Inc., was in reference to money due for •back salary of the secretary. Under the facts in this case, the decision of the lower court must be affirmed upon the proposition that if a right did exist in the corporation to pay in stock, it was waived as to the defendant John H. Fink, and such waiver is effective so far as the interests of the respondent bank are concerned. The Finkler family owned the corporation. Anna D. Fink was a sister of the other officers of the company. Proceedings were under way to eliminate John H. Fink from all their affairs. In the ad*165justment of the matters in difference between Anna and her husband, a balance of $1,800 was due him. In satisfaction of this amount' a note payable in two years was given, secured by an assignment of back salary due her from the Finkler Motor Car Company, Inc. The correspondence between Fink’s attorney and the company certainly warrants the inference that the amount due for back salary was payable in cash. With this established, the correctness of the judgment entered below cannot be questioned. *Somers v. Germania Nat. Bank, supra.*

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 13, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 571 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-198, K2025-196.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26312 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## * !HDES

CELEBRATING

~2 ~98T 25 ~o i

. ~ Y - E ARS 

### The State of New Hampshire 

## Department of Environmental Services

Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner Celebrating 25years ofprotecting New Hampshire's environment.

March 23, 2012 Mr. Curt Spalding, Administrator USEPA Region 1 5 Post Office Square Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912 Re: SIP Revision Proposal for VOCRACT Order Hutchinson Sealing Systems, Inc., Newfields, NH Facility ID

: 3301500046; RACT Order ARD-11-001 Dear Mr . Spalding: Pursuant to section 110of the Clean Air Act and as Governor John Lynch's designee, I hereby submit for your approval a proposed revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) . An electronic version of this submittal, which is an exact duplicate of the paper version, is enclosed on a disk. This revision involves the issuance of a VOCReasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Order in accordance with the New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules, Env-A 1205, RACT Procedures and Env-A 1220, Miscellaneous IndustrialAdhesives, to Hutchinson Sealing Systems, Inc., (HSS) ofNewfields, NH . On August 11, 2011, HSS filed an application to obtain a RACT Order that would allow for the generation and use ofemission credits for compliance with VOCRACT requirements. The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division (DES) published a public notice in the Union Leader and the Exeter Newsletter on February 3, 2012. No public comments or requests for a public hearing were received during the comment period. DES finalized the order and submitted it to USEPAon March 22, 2012. This SIP revision proposal includes the following documentation: " Acopy of the public notice published on February 3, 2012. " DES Proposed VOC RACT Order letter dated February 3, 2012. " DES final RACT Order issuance letter dated March 22, 2012. " Final RACT Order issued on March 22, 2012. " State Permit to Operate SP-0141 issued on March 22, 2012. DES is hereby withdrawing its SIP revision request regarding VOCRACT Order ARD-O1-002, issued to HSS and submitted to USEPA on August 8, 2002, and submitting VOCRACT Order ARD-11-001 in its place. Should you require further information, please contact Patricia North of the Air Resources Division, Permitting and Environmental Health Bureau at (603) 271-0901 or via e-mail at patricia.north@des .nh .gov. Sincerely, Craig A. Wright Assistant Director Air Resources Division CAW/prn Enclosures cc: David Conroy, USEPA

Paul MacDonald, Hutchinson Sealing Systems Inc. w/o enclosures Johnny Ray Evens, Hutchinson Sealing Systems Inc. w/o enclosures www .des.nh.gov 29 Hazen Drive " PO Box 95 " Concord, NH03302-0095 (F,(1'~) 771-Rr,n3 " TIITI ArrPCC~ RPlav NH 1-Rn(1-7~r,-7c)f,4
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 47

   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior 
  regarding requirements for exploratory drilling on the Arctic Outer 
                           Continental Shelf.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

 Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Cramer, 
and Mrs. Radewagen) submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior 
  regarding requirements for exploratory drilling on the Arctic Outer 
                           Continental Shelf.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement 
and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management of the Department of the 
Interior relating to ``Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations on the Outer 
Continental Shelf--Requirements for Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic 
Outer Continental Shelf'' (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 46478 (July 15, 
2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 143 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2019, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That division C of Public Law 115–245 is amended— 

4 (1) by striking the date specified in section 

5 105(3) and inserting ‘‘December 21, 2018’’; and 
2 

•HJ 143 EH 

1 (2) by adding at the end (before the short title) 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 136. Sections 1309(a) and 1319 of the Na4 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a) 

5 and 4026) shall be applied by substituting the date speci6 fied in section 105(3) of this Act for ‘December 7, 

7 2018’.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 143 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2019, and for other purposes.
American
Airlines, Inc.
 6-1162-TRW-0665
 Page
2


6-1162-TRW-0665








American
Airlines, Inc.


P.O. Box
619616


Dallas-Fort
Worth Airport


Texas
75261-9616








Subject:                      [CONFIDENTIAL
PORTION OMITTED AND FILED


SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT]








Reference:
            Purchase
      Agreement No. 3219 (the Purchase Agreement) between The Boeing Company
      (Boeing) and American Airlines, Inc. (Customer) relating to
      Model 787-923 aircraft (the
Aircraft)








This
letter agreement (Letter Agreement) amends and supplements the Purchase
Agreement.  All terms used but not defined in this Letter Agreement
have the same meaning as in the Purchase Agreement.





Customer
has requested and Boeing has agreed that [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].








[CONFIDENTIAL
PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST
FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT], and Boeing and Customer
shall execute a Supplemental Agreement to the Purchase Agreement conforming
Table 1, Supplemental Exhibit EE1 and the Performance Guarantees to Customer’s
[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT
TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].





P.A. No.
3219 80227
 Alternate_Engine_Selection Rev.:
01/08/04
 BOEING
PROPRIETARY
 
 American
Airlines, Inc.
 6-1162-TRW-0665
 Page
2


Confidential
Treatment.                                                      Customer
and Boeing understand that certain commercial and financial information
contained in this Letter Agreement are considered by Boeing and Customer as
confidential. Customer and Boeing agree that each will treat this Letter
Agreement and the information contained herein as confidential and will not,
without the prior written consent of the other, disclose this Letter Agreement
or any information contained herein to any other person or entity, except as
provided in this Letter Agreement or in the applicable Purchase
Agreement.














Very
truly yours,





THE
BOEING COMPANY








By





ItsAttorney-In-Fact








ACCEPTED
AND AGREED TO this





Date:
,
2008





AMERICAN
AIRLINES, INC.








By





Its











P.A. No.
3219
 Alternate_Engine_Selection Rev.:
01/08/04
 BOEING
PROPRIETARY
**EXHIBIT 10.47**

**THIRD AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT**

This Third Amendment to Purchase Agreement(“Amendment”) is made by and between the Kirk & Blum Manufacturing Company (“Purchaser”) and Buckley Properties Co. (“Seller”) under the following circumstances: 

A. Purchase and Seller are parties to that certain Purchase Agreement dated September 6, 2005 (“Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to whichSeller agreed to sell, and Purchaser agreed to purchase, certain real property more particularly described in the Purchase Agreement, all upon the terms and conditions contained therein; 

B. Pursuant to Section 8(d) through (h) of the Purchase Agreement, Purchaser’s obligation to close the transaction contemplated by thePurchase Agreement is subject to certain contingencies, none of which have occurred; and 

C. Purchaser and Seller heretofore amended thePurchase Agreement by written amendments dated November 15, 2005 and November 30, 2005; and 

D. Purchaser and Seller each desireto enter into this Third Amendment to extend the period of time within which Purchaser may satisfy the contingencies contained in Section 8(d) through (h) of the Purchase Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is herebyacknowledged, Purchase and Seller hereby agree as follows: 

1. Purchaser waives the contingencies contained in Sections 8(a), (b), and(c) of the Purchase Agreement, provided Seller cures Purchaser’s objections contained in Purchaser’s correspondence dated October 20, 2005 and October 21, 2005 to Purchaser’s sole satisfaction. 

2. Section 4(a) of the Purchase Agreement as previously amended is further amended by deleting the date “December 19, 2005” and replacingit with the date “January 20, 2006”, and any reference to “Closing” or “date of Closing” shall mean January 20, 2006. 

3. The period of time in which Seller has to notify Purchaser of which matters it will cure and how of those previously objected to by Purchaser following the Inspection Period, as set forth in the subject Agreement,is hereby further extended through January 20, 2006. 

4. Except as further amended, modified or altered hereby, the Purchase Agreementas heretofore amended is not otherwise amended, modified or altered, and each of the parties hereto ratifies, affirms and confirms each and every provision of the Purchase Agreement, as amended hereby. 

Dated this /15th/ day of December, 2005. 

 
PURCHASER:The Kirk & Blum Manufacturing CompanyBy: 
/s/ L. John Bertoli, III
 L. John Bertoli, III, Vice PresidentSELLER:Buckley Properties Co.By: 
/s/ Thomas Strotman
 Tom Strotman, Treasurer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-51051

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LORENZO ADRIAN MACIAS-MARTINEZ, also known as Adrian MaciasMartinez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-1675-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Lorenzo Adrian MaciasMartinez presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States

v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 562-63 (5th Cir. 2008), which held that the

disparity between sentences of defendants who can participate in a fast-track

program and defendants who cannot is not “unwarranted” within the meaning

of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-51051 Document: 00511515509 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2011
No. 10-51051

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its

alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-51051 Document: 00511515509 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2011
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

List of Subsidiaries of the Company:

 
| **Name of  Entity**               | ** ** | **State of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|------------|
|                              |       |                       |       |
| United Sugars Corporation         |       | Minnesota                  |       |
|                              |       |                       |       |
| Midwest Agri-Commodities Company  |       | Minnesota                  |       |
|                              |       |                       |       |
| ProGold Limited Liability Company |       | Minnesota                  |       |
|                              |       |                       |       |
| Crystech, LLC                     |       | Delaware                   |       |
|                              |       |                       |       |
| Sidney Sugars Incorporated        |       | Minnesota                  |       |
|                              |       |                       |       |
| Crab Creek Sugar Company          |       | Minnesota                  |       |

 

----
Exhibit 23(1)

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-11879) pertaining to the 1985 Stock Option Plan of American Biltrite
Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77318) pertaining to the
1993 Stock Award and Incentive Plan of American Biltrite Inc. of our report
dated March 8, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of American Biltrite Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 23, 1999


                                       74
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23(a)
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated June 29, 1999, included in this Form 10-K,
into The Alpine Group, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-16703, 2-70015, 333-60071, 33-81996 and 33-62544)
and on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-60073, 333-00301, 33-63819, 33-81996,
33-30246 and 33-53434).

Arthur Andersen LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
July 27, 1999