alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00105-CR

COURTNEY ME-SHA FRANKLIN,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 25,574

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Courtney Me-Sha Franklin was adjudicated guilty of the state-jail 

felony offense of credit card or debit card abuse by the trial court after it found “true” 

numerous violations of the conditions of her deferred adjudication community 

supervision. The trial court assessed a two-year sentence, and Appellant appealed. 

Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an 

Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in 

his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 
Franklin v. State Page 2

18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although informed of her right to do so, Appellant did not file a 

pro se response to the Anders brief. 

In an Anders case, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, [] 

decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; accord Stafford v. 

State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is “wholly frivolous” or 

“without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 

U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988).

We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find 

this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment. We grant appointed 

counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Appellant. Notwithstanding this 

grant, appointed counsel must send Appellant a copy of our decision, notify her of her

right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and send this Court a letter 

certifying counsel’s compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4. TEX. R.

APP. P. 48.4; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

(Chief Justice Gray concurs with a note)*

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed December 18, 2014

Do not publish

[CR25]
Franklin v. State Page 3

*(Chief Justice Gray concurs in the judgment to the extent it affirms the trial 

court’s judgment. A separate opinion will not issue.)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 186 (Thursday, December 11, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10951]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED

       SA 5699. Mr. SESSIONS submitted an amendment which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 5700. Mr. BAUCUS submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 7005, to amend the Internal 
     Revenue Code of 1986 to provide alternative minimum tax 
     relief for individuals for 2008; which was ordered to lie on 
     the table.
       SA 5701. Mr. ENSIGN (for himself and Mr. Shelby) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     7005, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 5702. Mr. ENSIGN (for himself and Mr. Shelby) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     7321, to authorize financial assistance to eligible 
     automobile manufacturers, and for other purposes; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 5703. Mr. CORKER submitted an amendment which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 5704. Mr. DODD submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 7005, to amend the Internal 
     Revenue Code of 1986 to provide alternative minimum tax 
     relief for individuals for 2008; which was ordered to lie on 
     the table.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

      ( print page 91805)    
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Advisory Committee for Technology, Innovation and Partnerships (# 84684) (Hybrid).                

*Date and Time:*                     December 13, 2024; 11a.m.-3p.m. (eastern).                

*Place:*                     NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 (In-Person and Virtual).                

                    The meeting will be hybrid, with some Advisory Committee members participating in person and others participating virtually. Members of the public can view the meeting virtually. To attend the virtual meeting, please send your request for the virtual meeting link to the following email:                     *afenzel@nsf.gov.*

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Persons:*                     Chaitanya Baru, Senior Advisor, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: (703) 292-8050.                

                    Additional meeting information, an updated agenda, and registration information will be posted on the AC's website at                     *https://new.nsf.gov/​tip/​tip-advisory-commitee.*

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice to the National Science Foundation concerning the implementation of the provisions of the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, Public Law 117-167, pertaining to the Directorate for Technology, Innovation and Partnerships (TIP), along with other related policies and activities of the Foundation.                

*Agenda:*

*Friday, December 13, 2024*
    - Welcome and overview of the TIP Advisory Committee's charge
    - Introduction to TIP, including current portfolio of investments and partnerships
    - Strategic recommendations for TIP
    - Next steps and closing remarks.

Dated: November 14, 2024.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-27057 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
8888 Acquisition Corporation - Exhibit 10.7 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com





Exhibit 10.7 

English Summary of 

  Employment Agreement 

Party A: Jinjiang Chengchang Shoes Co., Ltd. 

  Party B:  Xuanzhi Luo

In accordance with the Chinese Labor Contract Laws, the parties
  reach the following agreements: 

1. Term of the Contract: July 28, 2010 to July 27, 2011


2. Scope of the Work: Party B will serve as the chief financial
  officer of Party A. Party A has the right to change Party B’s position
  and work scope as it deems necessary, Party B shall not object to such change
  without proper cause. 

3. Work Time and Vacation: Party A shall comply with the applicable
  laws and regulations regarding work time and has right to adjust Party B’s
  work time based on his work scope. 

4. Compensation: RMB 8,000 per month. Party A shall have the
  right to adjust Party B’s salary based on his performance, tenure, change
  of position, etc.

5. Social Insurance: both Parties shall participate in the social
  insurance in compliance with the applicable laws and regulation. 

6. Labor protection, working conditions and protection against
  occupational hazards: Party A shall provide the labor protection and work condition
  as required by the applicable law and regulations; protect Party B against occupational
  hazards; and provide Party B with necessary trainings. 

7. Miscellaneous: Party B shall comply with Party A’s confidentiality
  rules. 

8. Amendment: this agreement can be amended only with consent
  of both Parties. 

9. Termination and Renewal: the termination, expiration and renewal
  of this agreement shall be governed by the applicable national, provincial and
  municipal rules and regulations. 

10. Dispute: if the parties have dispute regarding this agreement,
  the parties may apply for mediation through Party A’s labor dispute mediation
  committee; if the parties fail to resolve the dispute through mediation, the
  parties may submit written application to the local labor dispute arbitration
  commission within the time period permitted by the applicable regulation; if
  either parties refuse to accept such decision, such party may bring action at
  the local people’s court within 15 days from the receipt of the arbitration
  decision.

Party A: Jinjiang Chengchang Shoes Co., Ltd. 

  (SEAL) 

Party B:  Xuanzhi Luo

  /s/  Xuanzhi Luo
|   | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:          March 31, 2010    | by:             /s/ Roger S. Marcus       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                              | Roger S. Marcus, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director                                                             |

|   | by:             /s/ Howard N. Feist III       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Howard N. Feist III, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer                                                                      |
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AmSouth Bancorporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2005 (the Report), I, C. Dowd Ritter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Beth E. Mooney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       |  |  |  |                                       
|-------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|                                       |  | 
|/s/  C. Dowd Ritter                    |  |  |  | /s/  Beth E. Mooney                   
|C. Dowd Ritter Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Beth E. Mooney Chief Financial Officer

March 10, 2006
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 34 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior regarding 

requirements for exploratory drilling on the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself and Mr. PEARCE) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the 

Interior regarding requirements for exploratory drilling 

on the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement and the 

5 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management of the Department 

6 of the Interior relating to ‘‘Oil and Gas and Sulfur Oper7 ations on the Outer Continental Shelf—Requirements for 

8 Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Outer Continental 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 34 IH 

1 Shelf’’ (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 46478 (July 15, 2016)), 

2 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Publications Spanish

**Publicaciónes de la Comisión de Revisiónsobre Salud y Seguridad Ocupacional**

Normas de Procedimiento

Guía sobre los Procedimientos de la Comisión de Revisión

Guía del Empleado sobre los Procedimientos de la Comisión de Revisión

Guía sobre procedimientos simplificados 

Comisión De Revisión De Seguridad Y Salud Ocupacional Instrucciones Para La Presentación Electrónica De Documentos

Presentación Electrónica de Casos – Guía de Políticas y Procedimientos

Plan de Acceso a Idiomas

 

Para preguntas sobre los procedimientos de la Comisión de Revisión, por favor contacte (202) 606-5400.

 

Para preguntas sobre OSHA

Para OSHA Publicaciónes
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). LA / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR I A E S T HE R T OR R E S DE R OMO, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 70553 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 194- 060 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a r i aE s the rT orr e s D e R om o, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) r e i ns t a t e m e ntof apr i oror de rof

r e m ova l . W e ha ve 

# FI LED DE C 22 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSL A/ Res ea r ch 06- 70553 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of l a w a nd due p r o c e s s c la im s . G a r c ia de R in c o n v . D e p ’ t H o m e la n d Se c u r ity , 539 F . 3d 1133, 1 1 3 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T orre s D e R om o’ s c on t ent i on thatthe IJerre d i n rei nst at i ng her r em ov al or de rw i thoutde t e rm i ni ng he re l i gi bi l i tyf ora dj us tm e ntof

s t a tus f a i l s be c aus e s he w as no tel i gi bl e f

or an adj ustm entof st atus because s he re ent er ed the U ni t ed S t at es w ith o u t p e rm is s io n a f

te rb e in g r e m o v e d . Se e G onz ale s v . D e p’ t of H om e land Se c u r ity , 508 F . 3d 1227, 1242 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( abr oga t i ng P er ez -G on zalezv. A s h c r o ft , 3 7 9 F .3 d7 8 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ) . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 33 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 33

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2017

 Received and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall 
  Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. 
                      Marshall Museum and Library.

Whereas General George C. Marshall served as Army Chief of Staff during World 
        War II, Special Ambassador to China, Secretary of State, and Secretary 
        of Defense;
Whereas General George C. Marshall was promoted to General of the Army in 1944, 
        one of only five Army five-star generals in the history of the United 
        States;
Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in 
        1946 for his military strategy and vital role during World War II;
Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1953 for 
        developing the European economic recovery strategy known as the Marshall 
        Plan;
Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation was established in 1953 and is devoted 
        to preserving the legacy of General George C. Marshall through 
        educational scholarship programs and facilities;
Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation opened the George C. Marshall Museum 
        and George C. Marshall Research Library in 1964 in Lexington, Virginia, 
        on the post of the Virginia Military Institute, which is the alma mater 
        of General George C. Marshall;
Whereas the George C. Marshall Museum educates the public about the military and 
        diplomatic contributions of General George C. Marshall through extensive 
        exhibits; and
Whereas the George C. Marshall Research Library maintains the most comprehensive 
        collection of records documenting the life and leadership of General 
        George C. Marshall: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress designates the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. 
Marshall Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National 
George C. Marshall Museum and Library.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 7, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 99 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2017, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2017, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2017 (division 

4 C of Public Law 114–223) is further amended by— 

5 (1) striking the date specified in section 106(3) 

6 and inserting ‘‘May 5, 2017’’; and 

7 (2) inserting after section 201 the following 

8 new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 202. (a) This section may be cited as the ‘Fur10 ther Continued Health Benefits for Miners Act’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 99 IH 

1 ‘‘(b) Section 402(h)(2)(C)(ii) of the Surface Mining 

2 Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 

3 1232(h)(2)(C)(ii)) is amended— 

4 ‘‘(1) in subclause (II), by striking ‘April 30, 

5 2017’ and inserting ‘May 5, 2017’; 

6 ‘‘(2) in subclause (II)(aa), by striking ‘the Con7 tinued Health Benefits for Miners Act’ and inserting 

8 ‘the Further Continued Health Benefits for Miners 

9 Act’; and 

10 ‘‘(3) by adding at the end the following: ‘For 

11 purposes of subclause (II)(aa), a beneficiary enrolled 

12 in the Plan as of the date of the enactment of the 

13 Further Continued Health Benefits for Miners Act 

14 shall be deemed to have been eligible to receive 

15 health benefits under the Plan on January 1, 2017.’. 

16 ‘‘(c) The provisions of section 167(d) of Public Law 

17 114–223 (as added by Public Law 114–254) shall apply 

18 to this section.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 134 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 134

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2018

Mr. Arrington (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Gallagher, 
 Mr. Gonzalez of Texas, Mr. Meadows, Mr. O'Rourke, and Mr. Gianforte) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. No person shall serve as a Representative for more 
than six two-year terms. Service as a Representative for more than one 
year of any two-year term shall be treated as a complete term for 
purposes of this section, without regard to whether the service was 
completed by the individual originally elected to the term.
    ``Section 2. No person shall serve as a Senator for more than two 
six-year terms. Service as a Senator for more than three years of any 
six-year term shall be treated as a complete term for purposes of this 
section, without regard to whether the service was completed by the 
individual originally elected to the term.
    ``Section 3. This article shall not apply to any person who served 
as a Representative or as a Senator during any Congress occurring 
before the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```