alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                                  December 31,          December 31,
                                              ------------------     -----------------
                                                2000      1999        2000       1999
                                                ----      ----        ----       ----

<S>                                            <C>         <C>      <C>       <C>
Net Income (Loss)                              $  (1,036)  11,354  (48,827)   73,049
                                               =========  =======  =======   =======

Weighted average shares outstanding              205,287  210,415  206,996   217,362

Reduction for common shares not yet
 released by Employee Stock Ownership Plan         9,684   11,430   10,133    11,838
                                               ---------  -------  -------   -------

Total weighted average common shares
 outstanding for basic computation               195,603  198,985  196,863   205,524
                                               =========  =======  =======   =======

Basic earnings (loss) per share                $    (.01)     .06     (.25)      .36
                                               =========  =======  =======   =======

Total weighted average common shares
 outstanding for basic computation               195,603  198,985  196,863   205,524

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
 effect of stock options                           2,641    2,643    2,641     2,745
                                               ---------  -------  -------   -------

Total weighted average common shares and
 equivalents outstanding
 for diluted computation                         198,244  201,628  199,504   208,269
                                               =========  =======  =======   =======

Diluted earnings (loss) per share              $    (.01)     .06     (.25)      .35
                                               =========  =======  =======   =======
</TABLE>

                                      -17-
# Official Journal C 169/8 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 169 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 488 July 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 169

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 488 July 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 169/1 | Convention on the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980, and to the First and Second Protocols on its interpretation by the Court of Justice of the European Communities | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2005/C 169/1

Convention on the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980, and to the First and Second Protocols on its interpretation by the Court of Justice of the European Communities

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
223 SW 6 th Street Corvallis, OR 97333 T: 800

- 656

- 4721 www.VDOSGlobal.us REQUEST F OR AMENDMENT TO FAA EXEMPTION NO . 11112

March 19 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to VDOS Global Exemption No. 11112

Dear Sir or Madam,

VDOS Global requests amendment to our FAA Exemption No. 11112, Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0382 for the

purpose of conducting UAS operations within the National Airspa ce System . We req uest the following

change to our exemption to allow the conduct of aerial inspection of additional infrastructure and areas

of interest and benefit to the public good , and to conduct flight training and demonstration i n support of

these flights with the Aeryon SkyRanger UAS.

In the “The FAA’s Decision” section, on pa ge 12 , we request the change of text:

“...t o the extent necessary to allow VDOS to operate unmanned aircraft systems for the purpose of flare

stack inspections on 14 Shell Oil Gulf of Mexico Production platforms with all platforms beyond 12 nm of

the coas t of the United States.”

T o the following text:

“...to the extent necessary to allow VDOS to operate unmanned aircraft systems for the purpose of aerial

inspection, tra ining, and flight demonstration.”

Please contact the under signed if you should have any questions:

Sincerely,

Seth Johnson

Chief Pilot

VDOS Global

Cc:

Robert Pappas

John Duncan

Jake Troutman

John Barbagallo223 SW 6 th Street Corvallis, OR 97333 T: 800

- 656

- 4721 www.VDOSGlobal.us
#### Hugh McLean, plaintiff in error, *vs.*William W. Clark *et*al., defendants.

In a mo'ion for a new trial, the pole ground was that the verdict was strongly and decidedly against the weight of the testimony. The evidence was very voluminous and emphatically conflicting, and was, besides, largely the testimony of the parlies to the controversy, who were sworn as witnesses. This was, also, the second verdict of a jury to the same effect, under mainly the same evidence :

*Held,*that as the judge who tried the case has refused a new trial, this court will not interfere.

New trial. Before Judge Hall. Newton Superior Court. September Term, 1873.

This case is fully reported in 47 *Georgia Reports,*24. As it turns exclusively upon the evidence it is thought unnecessary to add anything here.

J. J. Floyd *;*James S. Hook, for plaintiff in error.

Clark *&*Pace ; C. Peeples ; A. T. Akerman ; A. M. Speer, for defendants.

McCay, Judge.

It would, in our opinion, be a violation of the oft-repeated rulings of this court to reverse this judgment. Upon the main issue, to-wit: the fraud and the putting of the plaintiff in fear, the evidence is very conflicting. McLean and his wife on one side, and Clark and Harris on the other, are most flatly and painfully discordant. Nor is there in the testimony of the two 'employees of McLean that fullness and accuracy and fairness, which should compel the jury to treat them as necessarily requiring a verdict for the plaintiff. Again, upon the question whether in fact there was any damage — whether the property was worth at the time and under the circumstances, any more than McLean got for it, the weight of evidence is with the defendants. But we do not deem it our duty to go in detail over the evidence in this case. The heavy pressure upon our *456time forbids it. It is enough to say that we are well satisfied this is not a case where the judge has abused his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONS

Harry    Kletter and Alan L. Schroering, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief    Financial Officer, respectively, of Industrial Services of America, Inc.,    hereby certify as of this 22nd day of March, 2010, that the Form 10-K for    the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the    information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,    the financial condition and results of operations of Industrial Services    of America, Inc.

 

|        |   |   | /s/ Harry Kletter                 |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                        |
|   |   |   | Harry Kletter, Chief Executive Officer |

 

|        |   |   | /s/ Alan L. Schroering                      |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                             |
|   |   |   | Alan L. Schroering, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S  UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000927790
<NAME>                        Union Acceptance Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         141,318
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (814)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,237
<PP&E>                                         7,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,988)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 449,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,777
<BONDS>                                        339,510
<COMMON>                                       58,360
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     28,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   449,192
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               35,702
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0                 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               3,275                   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,220                
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,548                
<INCOME-TAX>                                   98                
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,450
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0                
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,450                      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.19
                                                
                                                

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 440 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-307, K2025-305.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26570 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Waller *v.*Broddie.

Certiorari. The Plaintiff after obtaining *the certiorari*to remove 1 his cause from the Court below, into which it liad come by appeal from the judgment of a Justice of the Peace, had removed into South-Carolina ; and now upon motion to the Court for that purpose, Judge Wiii-xiams upon the bench, it was ordered, that unless by the next term or before, the Plaintiff put in sureties for prosecuting this cause, and for paying costs in case he fail therein, that this cause shall be dismissed. The Judge said upon this occasion, that the act of 1787, frequently operated with hardship, and peculiarly so, in the case of poor persons who had suffered injuries and were unable to give security ; and in some cases, the Court since that act, b«d permitted such persons to sue in *forma pauperis,.*without any sucii security ; but as the act was passed by the Legislature, the Court was bound by it. That the wot d writ, in the act., extended to the case of a certiorari, as well as to cases of bills in equity ; in w hich case, it had been decided, that such security should be given.

Note. — The act of 1810, *Rev. ch. 793,*requites security to be taken in the same manner as in the case of appeals, and 1 believe that the securities in such cases are considered in the same light, as sureties to an appeal bond, and where the judgment of the Court bi.low is affirmed in the Superior Court, judgum nt may be entered up in*stanter*against the Plaintiff in the *certiorari*and his securities.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32001R1595

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1595/2001 of 2 August 2001 amending representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector***Official Journal L 210 , 03/08/2001 P. 0023 - 0024*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1595/2001

of 2 August 2001

amending representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector(1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 of 23 June 1995 laying down detailed implementing rules for the import of products in the sugar sector other than molasses(2), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 624/98(3), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 1(2), and Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The amounts of the representative prices and additional duties applicable to the import of white sugar, raw sugar and certain syrups are fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1309/2001(4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1523/2001(5).

(2) It follows from applying the general and detailed fixing rules contained in Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 to the information known to the Commission that the representative prices and additional duties at present in force should be altered to the amounts set out in the Annex hereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 August 2001.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 August 2001.

For the Commission

Frederik Bolkestein

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 16.

(3) OJ L 85, 20.3.1998, p. 5.

(4) OJ L 177, 30.6.2001, p. 21.

(5) OJ L 201, 26.7.2001, p. 23.

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 2 August 2001 amending representative prices and the amounts of additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99

>TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 13, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 567 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-194, K2025-192.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26308 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S153]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 
Senate will proceed to a period of morning business, with Senators 
permitted to speak for up to 10 minutes each.
  Mr. REID. Mr. President, are we in a quorum call?
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. No, we are not. The majority leader 
is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EMUEL C. HENLEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 12 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of June, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0640 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-203-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: