alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Property Analysts Master
Limited Partnership ("NPAMLP") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, Edward B. Lipkin, President of EBL&S, Inc., the Managing General
Partner of NPAMLP, Robert McKinney, President of Feldman International, Inc.,
the Equity General Partner of NPAMLP, and David A. Simon, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of EBL&S Property Management, Inc., Agent for NPAMLP and
the equivalent of its Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NPAMLP.

                                       National Property Analysts Master Limited
                                       Partnership
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       (Registrant)

                                       Date: August 13, 2003

                                       By: EBL&S, Inc., its managing general
                                           partner
                                       -----------------------------------------

                                       By: /s/ Edward B. Lipkin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Edward B. Lipkin
                                           Title: President

                                       By: Feldman International Inc., its
                                           equity general partner
                                           -------------------------------------

                                       By: /s/ Robert McKinney
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Robert McKinney
                                           Title:   President

                                       By: EBL&S Property Management, Inc.,
                                           Agent for NPAMLP
                                           -------------------------------------

                                       By: /s/ David A. Simon
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: David A. Simon
                                           Title: Vice President
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Allied.
 /s/ Robert P. Dowski
    
    
    
    /s/ John J. MarcelloRobert P. Dowski
    
    
    
    John J. MarcelloChief Financial Officer
    
    
    
    Chief Executive OfficerOctober 5, 2005
    
    
    
    October 5, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 7 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 7

    Directing the Joint Committee on the Library to accept a statue 
  commemorating the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 for placement in the 
   United States Capitol, authorizing the use of the rotunda of the 
    Capitol for a ceremony for the presentation of the statue, and 
    directing the Architect of the Capitol to place the statue in a 
              suitable permanent location in the Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2017

   Mr. Ross (for himself, Ms. Kaptur, and Mr. Harris) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Directing the Joint Committee on the Library to accept a statue 
  commemorating the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 for placement in the 
   United States Capitol, authorizing the use of the rotunda of the 
    Capitol for a ceremony for the presentation of the statue, and 
    directing the Architect of the Capitol to place the statue in a 
              suitable permanent location in the Capitol.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. ACCEPTANCE AND PLACEMENT OF STATUE COMMEMORATING HUNGARIAN 
              REVOLUTION OF 1956.

    (a) Acceptance.--The Joint Committee on the Library shall accept 
for placement in the United States Capitol the ``Lads of Pest'' statue 
provided by Hungary to commemorate the heroes of the Hungarian 
Revolution of 1956 on the occasion of the Revolution's 60th 
anniversary.
    (b) Presentation Ceremony.--On such date following the acceptance 
of the statue under subsection (a) as the Joint Committee on the 
Library determines to be appropriate, the Joint Committee is authorized 
to use the rotunda of the Capitol for a presentation ceremony for the 
statue. The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board shall 
take such action as may be necessary with respect to physical 
preparations and security for the ceremony.
    (c) Placement.--
            (1) Initial placement in rotunda.--During a period not to 
        exceed one year beginning on the date of the presentation 
        ceremony under subsection (b), the Architect of the Capitol 
        shall place the statue accepted under this section in the 
        rotunda of the Capitol.
            (2) Permanent placement.--After the expiration of the 
        period described in paragraph (1), the Architect of the Capitol 
        shall provide for the placement of the statue in a suitable 
        permanent location in the United States Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on March 31, 2019
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
14-1688
Science Applications International Corp., d/b/a SAIC
06/23/16
DFR
10/31/16
Closed

2
15-1121
Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.
06/30/16
DFR
11/09/16
Closed

3
14-1268
Dover High Performance Plastics
07/19/16
DFR
11/01/16
Closed

4
15-1347
Gate Precast Co.
11/10/16
DFR 
12/05/16
Closed

 5
 16-1533
Cooper/T. Smith Corporation, d/b/a Blakeley Boatworks, Inc.
 04/27/17
DFR
04/27/17
Closed




 6
16-0803
The Lane Construction Corporation 
05/23/17
DFR
09/14/17
Closed

 7
16-1167
Aerospace Testing Alliance
08/22/17
DFR
11/20/17
Closed

 8
15-1069
Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc.
10/27/17
DFR
11/13/17
   Closed

 9
16-0940
Angel Brothers Enterprises, Ltd.
11/17/17
DFR
12/15/17
Closed

10
17-0190
Shelly & Sands, Inc.
05/02/18
DFR
05/10/18
Closed

11
15-1574
MasTec North America dba MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.
06/20/18
DFR
07/10/18
Open

12
17-0949
Walmart, Inc.
07/12/18
DFR
08/09/18
   Closed

13
16-1587
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc.
10/16/18
DFR
10/30/18
Closed

14
17-1214
Mansfield Industrial, Inc.
11/23/18
DFR
01/03/19
Open

15
17-0483
Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
11/28/18
DFR
12/19/18
Open

16
16-1628
Schaad Detective Agency, Inc.
12/18/18
DFR
01/07/19
Open

17
17-1174
Wayne Farms, LLC
03/01/19
DFR
03/21/19
Open

 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26570]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 15, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
440 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-307, K2025-305.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26570 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 23 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve to four 

in the House of Representatives and two in the Senate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2017 

Mr. HOLLINGSWORTH submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the number of terms that a Member 

of Congress may serve to four in the House of Representatives and two in the Senate. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 23 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person who has served four terms 

5 as a Representative shall be eligible for election to the 

6 House of Representatives. Any period during which a per7 son serves as a Representative pursuant to an election to 

8 fill a vacancy shall not be included as a term served by 

9 the person for purposes of this section. 

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has served two terms 

11 as a Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment 

12 to the Senate. For purposes of this section, any period 

13 during which a person serves as a Senator pursuant to 

14 an election or appointment to fill a vacancy shall not be 

15 included as a term served by the person for purposes of 

16 this section. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 3. No term beginning before the date of 

18 the ratification of this article shall be taken into account 

19 in determining eligibility for election or appointment under 

20 this article.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Order entered January 31, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00040-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.P. AND S.P., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-20-04783

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s January 18, 2022 motion for an extension of 

time to file a notice of appeal and appellee’s response opposing the motion. 

Appellant explains in his motion that he filed a motion pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Civil Procedure 306a to extend deadlines because counsel did not obtain actual 

notice of the trial court’s October 19, 2021 judgment until November 19, 2021.1 

See TEX. R. CIV. P. 306(a)(4). He further explains that the trial court has refused to 

set a hearing on his rule 306a motion. See id. 306a(5). In her response to the 

motion, appellee asserts that appellant’s remedy is by way of petition for writ of 

1 Appellant filed his notice of appeal and rule 306a motion on December 10, 2021.
mandamus for failing to conduct a hearing on his rule 306a motion. See Cantu v. 

Longoria, 878 S.W.2d 131, 132 (Tex. 1994).

Given the posture of this case with the notice of appeal having been filed, we 

ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the 

date of this order, on appellant’s rule 306a motion. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 306(a)(5).

We further ORDER the trial court to sign a written order that finds the date when 

appellant or his counsel first either received notice or acquired actual knowledge 

that the judgment was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(c).

We ORDER LaToya Young-Martinez, Official Court Reporter for the 255th 

Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record of the hearing WITHIN 

FORTY DAYS of the date of this order. 

We ORDER Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order on appellant’s rule 

306a motion , WITHIN THIRTY-FIVE DAYS of the date of this order.

Appellant’s extension motion will be determined after receiving the 

supplemental clerk’s record with the trial court’s order. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the 

Honorable Kim Cooks, Presiding Judge of the 255th Judicial District Court; Ms. 

Pitre: Ms. Young-Martinez; and, all parties.
We ABATE this appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to comply 

with this order. The appeal will be reinstated in FORTY DAYS or when the 

supplemental clerk’s record is filed with the requested order from the trial court, 

whichever occurs sooner.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
JACK FURST DRIVE

RIDGE ROAD

VALLEY LOOP

LOOP R OAD

LOGISTICS CEN TER ACCESS ROAD

GARDEN GROUN D ROAD

ECHO PASS

DELTA PASS

UPPER MT N BIKE ROAD

HEL I P AD ACCESS ROAD

ALP HA BRAVO ROAD

UPPER RIDGE R OAD

WWTPACC ESS ROAD (E AST)

WWTP ACCES S ROA D (WEST)

GAR DEN GROUND ACC E SS ROAD (EA S T)

HILLTOP WAY

MOUNTAIN PASS (NO RTH)

GARDEN GROUND ACCESS ROAD (WEST)

MOUNTAIN PASS E XT

RID GE ROAD

JAC K FURST DRIVE

LO OP ROAD

GARDEN

GROUND ROAD

UPPER RIDGE ROAD

!14 !6 !5

!1

!11

!4

!7

!15

!12

!3

!13

!8

!10

!9

!2

!5

Copyright:© 2009 ESRI

Legend

Reforestation Phase

2013

2014

2015

2016

Area Type

Backstack

Flat

2013 Development Areas

Conservation Area

Summit Property Boundary

Primary Roads

Secondary/Access Roads

Summit Bechtel Scout Reserve: Proposed Reforestation Plan

°

Conservation Area

SBR North Entrance

To South Entrance

Mayhem

Mountain

Adventure

Valley

Summit Center

Garden Ground

Mount Hope

Logistics

Center

Gate One

Base Camp

A

Base Camp

B

Base Camp

C

Base Camp

D

Base Camp

E

Base Camp

F

SBR South Entrance

1 inch = 2,640 feet

0 0.25 0.5 1

Miles

Glen Jean

(Flat)

61

16

16

61

61

16

£¤19

£¤19

£¤19

Notes

1. Areas #6 & #7 are flat.

All other areas are

backstack.

2. #9 is DOH roadcut

3. #2 is waste area slope +

AML slope

4. #1 Includes roadcut

Area Acres

1 55.87

2 16.52

3 35.66

4 42.62

5 14.1

5 76.32

6 21.77

7 40.28

8 25.06

9 17.71

10 21.57

11 53.66

12 23.83

13 25.93

14 104.7

15 39.82
Exhibit 10.1


 


[CANTEL MEDICAL CORP. LETTERHEAD]


 


To:                  All executive officers of Cantel Medical
Corp. (the “Executives”)


Fr:                      Andrew A. Krakauer,
President and CEO


Re:                   Severance Agreements


Date:        October 25, 2010


 


On
October 21, 2010, at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Cantel Medical
Inc. (the “Company”), the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors, approved an amendment to the Severance
Agreements dated January 1, 2010 between the Company (or Company subsidiary)
and each of the Executives (the “Severance Agreement(s)”) to provide for
automatic, accelerated vesting of all outstanding options/restricted stock held
by the Executive upon termination of his employment by the Company (or
subsidiary) without cause.


 


Therefore,
effective as of October 21, 2010, Section 4(e) of each Severance
Agreement is amended by deleting said section and replacing it with the
following:


 


“(e) In the event such termination occurs prior to the full
vesting of stock options and restricted stock held by the participant (i.e.,
the options becoming exercisable in their entirety and the restricted stock
ceasing to have any risks of forfeiture), then, effective as of the Termination
Date, vesting of stock options will automatically accelerate in full and all
restrictions of restricted stock Awards will automatically lapse.”


 


Please
sign and return a copy of this letter to acknowledge your receipt of this
memorandum and attach this memorandum to your Severance Agreement.


 


Sincerely,


 


 


Andrew
A. Krakauer


President
and CEO


 


 


ACKNOWLEDGED:


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
   

  
	
  Date:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 103 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.103
                                     Agreed to February 26, 2018        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE 
              CEREMONY.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on April 9, 2018, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of 
the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical 
preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with 
such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
-  Programs 
          -  Reclaiming Abandoned Mine Lands 
          e-AMLIS
e-AMLIS Priority 1 and 2 Problem Types
e-AMLIS Priority 3 Problem Type
e-AMLIS Priority 4 and 5 Problem Types
e-AMLIS Data Dictionary

# e-AMLIS Priority 4 and 5

The 1990 amendments to SMCRA eliminated the original Priority 4 pertaining to AML reclamation research and renumbered Priority 5 Priority 4 and Priority 6 Priority 5. The 2006 amendments to SMCRA eliminated Priorities 4 and 5 for future projects, however, the e-AMLIS will continue to maintain historical information on Priority 4 and 5 projects completed prior to the amendments.

## Priority 4

The protection, repair, replacement, construction, or enhancement of public facilities such as utilities, roads, recreation, and conservation facilities adversely affected by coal mining practices.

## Priority 5

The development of publicly owned land adversely affected by coal mining practices including land acquired as provided in SMCRA for recreation and historic purposes, conservation, and reclamation purposes and open space benefits.
FEDERAL REGISTER: 55 FR 78 (January 2, 1990)

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM)

30 CFR Parts 700, 702, 750, 870, 905, 910, 912, 921, 922, 933, 937, 939, 941, 942, and 947

Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations; 

Exemption for Coal Extraction Incidental to the Extraction of Other Minerals

ACTION: Correction 

In rule document 89-29434 beginning on page 52092 in the issue of Wednesday, December 20, 1989, make the following 

corrections: 

 1. On page 52092, in the second column, in the first complete paragraph, in the fourth line, insert "Sess." following 

"1st". 

 2. On page 52094, in the 2nd column, in the 1st complete paragraph, in the 12th line, "of" should read "is". 

 3. On page 52095, in the third column, under Section 702.5 Definitions, in the second complete paragraph, in the fifth 

line, the second "the" should read "a". 

 4. On page 52096, in the 3rd column, in the 1st complete paragraph, in the 18th line, "is" should read "as". 

 5. On page 52098, in the third column, in the first complete paragraph, in the ninth line, "application" should read 

"applicant". 

 6. On the same page, in the same column, in eighth line from the bottom, "address" should read "addresses". 

 7. On page 52102, in the 2nd column, in the 13th line, "Sec. 702.702.16" should read "Sec. 702.16". 

 8. On page 52103, in the third column, in the fourth line "applicant can convince the regulatory" should read 

"authority that the estimates so". 

 9. On page 52118, in the 3rd column, under F. Section 870.11(d) Applicability, in the 16th line, "part 703" should 

read "part 702". 

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-17-00235-CR

JAMES STEVEN CHAMPION, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (1465584D)

January 3, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel