Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2024 / Notices 91443 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3 17 CFR 240.17ad–25(i). 

4Commission Rule 17ad–25(a) defines ‘Service 

Provider for Core Services’ as any person that, 

through a written services provider agreement for 

services provided to or on behalf of a registered 

clearing agency, on an ongoing basis, directly 

supports the delivery of clearance or settlement 

functionality or any other purposes material to the 

business of the registered clearing agency. 

prescribed amounts. The collection 

obtains earnings information needed by 

the Railroad Retirement Board to 

determine possible reductions in 

annuities because of earnings. 

Changes proposed: The RRB proposes 

minor changes to update the office 

hours on Form G–19L. 

The burden estimate for the ICR is as 

follows: 

Form No. Annual responses Time 

(minutes) 

Burden 

(hours) 

G–19L ........................................................................................................................ 300 15 75 

Additional Information or Comments: 

Copies of the forms and supporting 

documents or comments regarding the 

information collection should be 

addressed to Brian Foster, Railroad 

Retirement Board, 844 North Rush 

Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611–1275 or 

emailed to Brian.Foster@rrb.gov. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

Brian Foster, 

Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2024–26936 Filed 11–18–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7905–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–101603; File No. SR–ICC– 

2024–011] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE 

Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing of 

Proposed Rule Change Relating to the 

ICC Operational Risk Management 

Framework 

November 13, 2024. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934,1 and 

Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is 

hereby given that on October 31, 2024, 

ICE Clear Credit LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with 

the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the 

proposed rule change, as described in 

Items I, II and III below, which Items 

have been primarily prepared by ICC. 

The Commission is publishing this 

notice to solicit comments on the 

proposed rule change from interested 

persons. 

I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the 

Terms of Substance of the Proposed 

Rule Change 

The principal purpose of the 

proposed rule change is to revise the 

Operational Risk Management 

Framework. These revisions do not 

require any changes to the ICC Clearing 

Rules (the ‘‘Rules’’). 

II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the 

Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the 

Proposed Rule Change 

In its filing with the Commission, ICC 

included statements concerning the 

purpose of and basis for the proposed 

rule change, security-based swap 

submission, or advance notice and 

discussed any comments it received on 

the proposed rule change, securitybased swap submission, or advance 

notice. The text of these statements may 

be examined at the places specified in 

Item IV below. ICC has prepared 

summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B), 

and (C) below, of the most significant 

aspects of these statements. 

(A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the 

Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the 

Proposed Rule Change 

(a) Purpose 

ICC proposes to revise its ORMF. The 

ORMF details ICC’s dynamic and 

independent program of risk assessment 

and oversight that aims to reduce 

operational incidents, encourage 

process, and control improvement, bring 

transparency to operational performance 

standard monitoring, and fulfill 

regulatory obligations. ICC believes such 

proposed revisions will facilitate the 

prompt and accurate clearance and 

settlement of securities transactions and 

derivative agreements, contracts, and 

transactions for which it is responsible. 

ICC proposes to make such changes 

effective following Commission 

approval of the proposed rule change. 

The proposed revisions are described in 

detail as follows. 

The primary purpose of the proposed 

revisions is to incorporate procedures 

designed to comply with Commission 

Rule 17Ad–25(i) 3 which imposes 

requirements on ICC related to the 

management of risks from relationships 

with service providers for core services 4

(‘‘SPCS’’). ICC proposes adding new 

Section II.B. ‘Management of Risks from 

Relationships with Service Providers for 

Core Services’ to the ORMF which adds 

procedures regarding ICC’s management 

of the risks related to relationships with 

SPCS. Specifically, proposed Section 

II.B. imposes the following requirements 

on ICC: (1) ICC senior management is 

required to evaluate and document the 

risks related to an agreement with a 

SPCS, including under changes to 

circumstances and potential 

disruptions, and whether the risks can 

be managed in a manner consistent with 

the ORMF; (2) ICC senior management 

is required to submit to the Board for 

review and approval any agreement that 

would establish a relationship with a 

SPCS, along with a risk evaluation 

described in (1) above; (3) ICC senior 

management is required to establish 

policies and procedures that govern 

relationships and manage risks related 

to such agreements with SPCS and the 

Board is required to be responsible for 

reviewing and approving such policies 

and procedures; and (4) ICC senior 

management is required to perform 

ongoing monitoring of the relationships 

with SPCS, and report to the Board 

which will provide its evaluation of any 

action taken by ICC senior management 

to remedy significant deterioration in 

performance or address changing risks 

or material issues identified through 

such monitoring, or if the risks or issues 

cannot be remedied, require ICC senior 

management to assess and document 

weaknesses or deficiencies in the 

relationship with the SPCS for 

submission to the Board. Also, ICC 

proposes to include in new Section II.B. 

a description of how ICC will identify 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
91444 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2024 / Notices 

5 17 CFR 240.17ad–25(i). 

6The ICC BCP and DR Oversight Committee is a 

subcommittee of the ICC Compliance Committee 

and assists the ICC Compliance Committee in 

fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect 

to: (i) providing Business Continuity Planning 

(‘‘BCP’’) and Disaster Recovery (‘‘DR’’) guidance; (ii) 

approving BCP and DR program documentation; 

(iii) reviewing reports on the effectiveness of BCP 

and DR testing; and (iv) the performance of such 

other functions as the ICC Compliance Committee 

may assign from time to time. 

7The ICC Compliance Committee is an internal 

ICC committee that oversees and manages ICC’s 

compliance program that establishes the framework 

for identifying, assessing, measuring, monitoring, 

mitigating, and reporting on compliance risks for 

ICC. 

8 Version 4.0.4 of the ORMF was reviewed and 

approved by the Compliance Committee on 

and manage its SPCS using a twopronged assessment approach broken 

down between internal and external 

service providers. With respect to 

internal service providers, the proposed 

addition to the ORMF describes certain 

services provided by ICC’s ultimate 

parent, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 

(‘‘ICE, Inc.’’) and the applicable legal 

agreements between ICC and ICE, Inc. 

With respect to the identification and 

oversight of external service providers, 

the proposed revisions to the ORMF 

describe the use of ICE, Inc.’s third party 

risk management program and of ICC’s 

counterparty monitoring procedures. As 

a result of the proposed addition of new 

Section II.B., the remainder of the 

ORMF has been re-lettered. 

ICC further proposes to revise and 

replace the former ‘Vendor Assessment’ 

processes in Section II.B. with updated 

Section II.C. ‘External Service Provider 

Assessments’ processes. Accordingly, 

the proposed revisions include 

renaming ‘‘critical vendors’’ as ‘‘external 

SPCS’’ and, together with new Section 

II.B., clarifying that ICC’s assessment of 

external SPCS is in addition to, and will 

take into consideration, ICE, Inc.’s third 

party risk management program. ICC 

proposes to remove the bullet point list 

of items that may be included in the risk 

assessments and replace it with 

language to mirror the regulatory 

requirement of new Commission Rule 

17ad–25(i).5 In particular, ICC, through 

its BCP and DR Oversight Committee 6

(‘‘BDOC’’), must evaluate and document 

the risks related to an agreement with an 

external SPCS, including under changes 

to circumstances and potential 

disruptions, and whether the risks can 

be managed in a manner consistent with 

the ORMF. ICC also proposes updating 

and reordering the language describing 

the responsibilities of the BDOC. The 

BDOC will continue to review and 

recommend approval of the inventory of 

ICC external SPCS (formerly the 

‘‘critical vendor’’ inventory) and will 

continue to assign risk ratings to the risk 

assessments in order to determine the 

frequency of ongoing risk assessment 

reviews. The risk ratings continue to be 

based on the risk assessments and 

consideration of the risk direction for 

strategic, reputational, compliance, 

legal, and operational risk presented by 

the external SPCS (formerly critical 

vendor). ICC is proposing to also clarify 

that the risk ratings will take into 

consideration ICC’s plan to complete 

core processing if the service is 

unavailable. In order to provide for 

more internal consistency, ICC is 

proposing to replace the terminology of 

‘‘Tier’’ with ‘‘Risk Rating’’ noting that 

the criteria and schedule for periodic 

reviews remains the same. 

Furthermore, ICC proposes 

clarifications to the ‘Introduction’ 

section of the ORMF to provide uniform 

abbreviations to existing defined terms. 

By incorporating these abbreviations, 

ICC aims to enhance the clarity and 

readability of the ORMF. 

Also, ICC proposes revising the 

‘Operational Risk Lifecycle’ chart in 

Section I. of the ORMF to replace 

‘‘Respond’’ with ‘‘Monitor,’’ and to 

replace ‘‘Monitor’’ with ‘‘Mitigate.’’ The 

purpose of the revisions to the 

Operational Risk Lifecycle chart is to 

ensure that it accurately reflects the 

description of the operational life cycle 

narrative contained in Section I. 

Furthermore, ICC proposes to correct 

typographical errors in Sections I.A. and 

I.B., to, in each case, delete an erroneous 

‘‘The.’’ 

ICC also proposes revisions to Section 

II., ‘Operational Risk Focus Areas’, to 

update ICC’s reference to certain 

functions performed by ICE, Inc. ICC 

proposes to remove the reference to 

functions being ‘‘outsourced’’ to ICE, 

Inc. and instead notes that the functions 

performed by ICE, Inc. are described in 

the ORMF (e.g., the newly added 

Section II.B.) and such functions are 

performed pursuant to services 

agreements entered into between ICC 

and ICE, Inc. 

In addition, ICC proposes to amend 

Section II.A., ‘Business Continuity 

Planning and Disaster Recovery,’ to 

better describe the steps in the 

collaboration process with respect to the 

business impact analysis (‘‘BIA’’) 

process. Specifically, ICC is proposing 

to reorder and restate the steps for 

completing BIA surveys used in creating 

test plans. Specifically, ICC is clarifying 

that each critical business unit begins by 

performing the BIA; then business 

continuity plans (‘‘BCPs’’) are created 

for those processes identified in the 

BIA; finally, the BCPs are tested, and the 

results of such testing are reported. This 

refresh of the language in Section II.A. 

better describes the order of ICC’s 

process with respect to recovery from a 

wide-scale disruption. 

ICC proposes revisions to Section II.F. 

(previously Section II.E.) ‘Technology 

Control Functions.’ Specifically, ICC 

proposes changes to the description of 

the responsibilities of the ICC 

Technology Department to more 

accurately reflect the responsibilities of 

the ICC Technology Department control 

functions. Such proposed changes 

clarify that the ICC Technology 

Department is responsible for end to 

end design, development, testing, 

deployment, maintenance and day to 

day operations of enterprise software 

systems needed for ICC core functions. 

In addition, ICC proposes to update the 

reference to the title of the ‘ICC Project 

Delivery Policy’ to the document’s 

current title which is the ICC ‘Credit 

Technology Delivery Method.’ Also, ICC 

proposes a minor revision to change a 

reference to the ICC technology director 

to rather reference the ICC Technology 

leadership team to more accurately 

reflect that technology releases are 

assessed by the entire ICC Technology 

leadership team and not just the ICC 

technology director. 

Furthermore, ICC proposes to amend 

Appendix 1 in the ORMF to include the 

titles of the relevant regulatory 

requirements while removing the 

summaries of such regulations. The 

purpose of this proposed amendment is 

to streamline the reference process in 

order to provide the reader with a more 

direct reference to all the applicable 

regulations and to avoid the need to 

review and update summaries of 

applicable regulations as they are 

amended from time-to-time. By 

removing the summaries, employees 

instead should refer to the full current 

regulation which will ensure employees 

are reviewing the most up-to-date 

language in the regulations. 

Lastly, ICC proposes to revise the 

‘Revision History’ section of the ORMF 

to reflect the proposed changes 

described above. 

In addition to the foregoing proposed 

modifications to the ORMF, ICC also 

proposes to formalize a series of nonmaterial updates to the ORMF which 

were reviewed and approved by the 

Board in 2021, 2022 and 2023. Such 

proposed changes, which are described 

below, are the output of the annual 

review of the ORMF conducted by the 

ICC Compliance Committee 7 (the 

‘‘Compliance Committee’’) and 

reviewed and approved by the Board. 

In 2021 the Board approved nonmaterial changes to the ORMF 8 to 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2024 / Notices 91445 

November 18, 2021, recommended by the Risk 

Committee for approval by the Board on December 

8, 2021, and approved by the Board on December 

8, 2021. 

9 Version 4.0.5 of the ORMF was reviewed and 

approved by the Compliance Committee on 

November 29, 2022, recommended by the Risk 

Committee for approval by the Board on December 

13, 2022, and approved by the Board on December 

13, 2022. 

10Proposed modifications to Version 4.0.5 of the 

ORMF was reviewed and approved by the 

Compliance Committee on November 28, 2023, 

recommended by the Risk Committee for approval 

by the Board on December 13, 2023, and approved 

by the Board on December 13, 2023. 

11 ‘‘IS’’ stands for Information Security and 

‘‘GRC’’ stands for Governance, Risk and 

Compliance. 

12 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. 

13 17 CFR 240.17ad–22. 

14 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). 

15 Id. 

16 Id. 

17 17 CFR 240.17ad–22(e)(17). 

18 Id. 

clarify language in Section I.A. ‘Risk 

Assessment.’ Specifically, revisions 

were made to clarify the language which 

describes the Compliance Committee’s 

review of risk assessments. In addition, 

such Board approved changes in 2021 

made minor clarifications to Section I.B. 

to provide further clarity regarding one 

of the current responsibilities of the ICE, 

Inc. Enterprise Risk Management 

(‘‘ERM’’) function. Specifically, such 

change clarified that, with respect to the 

incident management and mitigation 

process, ERM may review and challenge 

corrective action plan decisions and 

priority levels. Both 2021 changes are 

non-material as they are intended to 

clarify the description of current 

practices and the readability of the 

ORMF, and as such, do not change 

current practices. As part of these 2021 

changes, the ORMF was re-dated 

December 8, 2021, the version was 

changed to 4.0.4 and the version history 

was updated to reflect these changes. 

In 2022 the Board approved nonmaterial changes to the ORMF 9 in 

connection with the annual review of 

the document. No changes were made to 

the ORMF as a result of the 2022 review. 

However, the document was re-dated 

December 13, 2022, the version was 

changed to 4.0.5 and the version history 

was updated to reflect the annual 

review. 

In 2023 the Board approved nonmaterial changes to the ORMF 10 to 

make minor language clarifications and 

to update the title of a cross- referenced 

ICE, Inc. procedures document. To date, 

the 2023 changes have not been 

incorporated into the ORMF and ICC is 

proposing to add the 2023 changes to 

the changes described herein. 

Specifically, ICC proposes to revise 

Section II.E. (previously Section II.D.), 

‘ICE Information Security’ to update the 

title of a cross-referenced ICE, Inc. 

procedures document from ‘ICE 

Information Security Risk Management 

and Assessment Procedures’ to ‘ICE IS 

GRC Risk Assessment Profile 

Procedures’ 11 (the ‘‘Cross-Referenced 

Procedure’’). The Cross- Referenced 

Procedure was renamed in order to 

better reflect the subjects covered in the 

procedures. Such renaming does not 

affect the content, ownership, or use of 

the Cross-Referenced Procedure. In 

addition, ICC proposes to clarify 

language in paragraph 2 of Section II.E. 

Specifically, ICC proposes to delete the 

word ‘‘potential’’ from the reference to 

security controls because the word 

improperly narrows the sentence’s 

meaning and does not accurately 

describe ICC’s current practice of 

reviewing not only potential security 

controls but also existing security 

controls. In connection with the 2023 

changes, ICC proposes updating the 

version history to reflect these changes. 

(b) Statutory Basis 

ICC believes that the proposed 

changes are consistent with the 

requirements of Section 17A of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 12 and the regulations 

thereunder applicable to it, including 

the applicable standards under Rule 

17Ad–22.13 In particular, Section 

17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 14 requires that 

the rule change be consistent with the 

prompt and accurate clearance and 

settlement of securities transactions and 

derivative agreements, contracts and 

transactions cleared by ICC, the 

safeguarding of securities and funds in 

the custody or control of ICC or for 

which it is responsible, and the 

protection of investors and the public 

interest. ICC believes that the proposed 

rule change is consistent with the 

requirements of the Act and the rules 

and regulations thereunder applicable to 

ICC, in particular, to Section 

17A(b)(3)(F),15 because the proposed 

rule change enhances ICC’s ability to 

control its operational risk by ensuring 

that ICC is incorporating detailed 

practices on managing relationship and 

risks with SPCS. As such, the proposed 

rule change is designed to promote the 

prompt and accurate clearance and 

settlement of securities transactions, 

derivatives agreements, contracts, and 

transactions; to contribute to the 

safeguarding of securities and funds 

associated with security-based swap 

transactions in ICC’s custody or control, 

or for which ICC is responsible; and, in 

general, to protect investors and the 

public interest within the meaning of 

Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.16

Rule 17Ad–22(e)(17) 17 requires each 

covered clearing agency to establish, 

implement, maintain, and enforce 

written policies and procedures 

reasonably designed to manage its 

operational risks by (i) identifying the 

plausible sources of operational risk, 

both internal and external, and 

mitigating their impact through the use 

of appropriate systems, policies, 

procedures, and controls; (ii) ensuring 

that systems have a high degree of 

security, resiliency, operational 

reliability, and adequate, scalable 

capacity; and (iii) establishing and 

maintaining a business continuity plan 

that addresses events posing a 

significant risk of disrupting operations. 

The proposed revisions provide details 

and updates with respect to ICC’s 

management of SPCS and assuring that 

risks and relationships between ICC and 

the SPCS are continuously being 

monitored. Such detailed processes are 

intended to enhance ICC’s ability to 

identify relevant sources of operational 

risk, both internal and external, and 

define processes and controls for the 

mitigation of the impact of such 

identified risks through the use of 

appropriate systems, policies, 

procedures, and controls, thereby 

ensuring that ICC will continue to fulfill 

regulatory obligations, consistent with 

the requirements of Rule 17Ad– 

22(e)(17).18

Rule 17Ad–25(i) requires that a 

registered clearing agency must 

establish, implement, maintain, and 

enforce written policies and procedures 

reasonably designed to (1) Require 

senior management to evaluate and 

document the risks related to an 

agreement with a service provider for 

core services, including under changes 

to circumstances and potential 

disruptions, and whether the risks can 

be managed in a manner consistent with 

the clearing agency’s risk management 

framework; (2) Require senior 

management to submit to the board of 

directors for review and approval any 

agreement that would establish a 

relationship with a service provider for 

core services, along with the required 

risk evaluation; (3) Require senior 

management to be responsible for 

establishing the policies and procedures 

that govern relationships and manage 

risks related to such agreements with 

service providers for core services and 

require the board of directors to be 

responsible for reviewing and approving 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
91446 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2024 / Notices 

19 17 CFR 240.17ad–25(i). 

20 Id. 

21 17 CFR 240.17ad–22(e)(2)(i) and (v). 22 Id. 23 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

such policies and procedures; and (4) 

Require senior management to perform 

ongoing monitoring of the relationship, 

and report to the board of directors for 

its evaluation of any action taken by 

senior management to remedy 

significant deterioration in performance 

or address changing risks or material 

issues identified through such 

monitoring; or if the risks or issues 

cannot be remedied, require senior 

management to assess and document 

weaknesses or deficiencies in the 

relationship with the service provider 

for submission to the board of 

directors.19 The proposed revisions add 

detailed procedures with respect to 

ICC’s management of the risks 

associated with relationships with 

SPCS. Such procedures include the 

requirement that ICC evaluate and 

document the risks related to an 

agreement with a SPCS and whether 

such risks can be managed in a manner 

consistent with the ORMF. The new 

procedures also require that such risk 

evaluation be provided to the Board, 

along with any agreement that would 

establish a relationship with a SPCS, for 

the Board’s review and approval. 

Furthermore, such new procedures 

establish ICC’s processes for managing 

and monitoring the risks associated with 

such relationships with SPCS, including 

procedures for remediation of any 

significant deterioration in performance 

or to address changing risks. Such 

detailed procedures are intended to 

enhance ICC’s ability to identify and 

manage risks associated with SPCS, 

consistent with the requirements of Rule 

17Ad–25(i).20

Furthermore, the proposed changes 

are consistent with the requirements of 

Rule 17Ad–22(e)(2)(i) and (v) 21 which 

requires, in part, that a covered clearing 

agency establish, implement, maintain 

and enforce written policies and 

procedures reasonably designed to 

provide for governance arrangements 

that are clear and transparent and 

specify clear and direct lines of 

responsibility. The non-material 

changes approved by the Board in 2021 

and 2023 to update the ORMF to clarify 

the description of the Compliance 

Committee and ERM responsibilities, as 

well as the general updates to ensure the 

ORMF is accurate and up-to-date, are 

consistent with the requirement to 

maintain clear and transparent 

governance arrangements, and with the 

requirement to specify clear and direct 

lines of responsibility. Such changes 

improve the accuracy and transparency 

of ICC’s governance arrangements and 

improve the clarity of the lines of 

responsibility. In ICC’s view, the 

proposed changes are therefore 

consistent with the requirements of Rule 

17Ad–22(e)(2)(i) and (v).22

(B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on 

Burden on Competition 

ICC does not believe the proposed 

rule change would have any impact, or 

impose any burden, on competition. 

The proposed changes to revise the 

ORMF will apply uniformly across all 

market participants. Therefore, ICC does 

not believe the proposed rule change 

would impose any burden on 

competition that is inappropriate in 

furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 

(C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on 

Comments on the Proposed Rule 

Change Received From Members, 

Participants or Others 

Written comments relating to the 

proposed rule change have not been 

solicited or received. ICC will notify the 

Commission of any written comments 

received by ICC. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

Within 45 days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register or within such longer period 

up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may 

designate if it finds such longer period 

to be appropriate and publishes its 

reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which 

the self-regulatory organization 

consents, the Commission will: 

(A) by order approve or disapprove 

such proposed rule change, or 

(B) institute proceedings to determine 

whether the proposed rule change 

should be disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s internet 

comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ 

rules-regulations/self-regulatoryorganization-rulemaking); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include file number SR– 

ICC–2024–011 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

Send paper comments in triplicate to 

Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549. 

All submissions should refer to file 

number SR–ICC–2024–011. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ 

rules-regulations/self-regulatoryorganization-rulemaking). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 10 

a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings 

will also be available for inspection and 

copying at ICC’s principal office and on 

ICC’s website at https://www.ice.com/ 

clear-credit/regulation. 

Do not include personal identifiable 

information in submissions; you should 

submit only information that you wish 

to make available publicly. We may 

redact in part or withhold entirely from 

publication submitted material that is 

obscene or subject to copyright 

protection. 

All submissions should refer to file 

number SR–ICC–2024–011 and should 

be submitted on or before December 10, 

2024. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.23

Sherry R. Haywood, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024–26869 Filed 11–18–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1