alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. C. D. BUTNER.

*Charge to Jury — Manner of.*

In a charge to a jury, where there is no allegation that the emphasis, tone ormanner of the Judge impressed his words with any other than their recognized signification ; *Held,*not to be error.

INDICTMENT, for Fornication and Adultery, tried at Fall Term, 1876, of Yadkin Superior Court, before *Kerr, J.*

The facts in the case and the exception to His Honor’s charge to the jury, are sufficiently stated in the opinion of *119this Court. There was a verdict of guilty and judgment,, from which the defendant appealed.

*Attorney*General, for the State.

*Mr. J. M. McCorkle,*for defendant.

Reade, J.

The defendant and a woman were indicted for fornication and adultery ; and there was evidence, that in a playful scuffle between them, in the presence of the defendant’s wife and others, the woman fell or was pulled into the lap of the defendant. And the Solicitor for the State insisted in his argument to the jury, that such familiarity was evidence of guilt; and indeed, that the impropriety was so great, that if it had been in refined society and the female had had a proper “avenger,” it would have put the defendant’s life in jeopardy. To this the defendant’s counsel replied, that while that might be so in high life, yet such acts of familiarity were common in that section among plain people, such as the defendants were, and that they were regarded as “innocent sport.” That is what we understand the counsel said, substantially.

After reciting what the counsel on both sides had said as above, His Honor said to the jury, “ It is for you, gentlemen of the jury, to say if such acts are usual here.”

The defendant insists that thereby His Honor intimated to the jury his opinion upon, the facts, in violation of the statute of 1796.

Now we can conceive how, by emphasis, tone and manner, ITis Honor might have expressed his indignation and horror at what was said by the defendant’s counsel and his strong sympathy with what was said by the Solicitor, by the language which he used, just as well as if he had said, “It is for you to say, gentlemen of the jury, whether it is possible' for such acts of familiarity to be usual among any virtuous *120people, and whether they are not the clearest proof of the guilt of the defendant.”

But there is no allegation that there was anything in Ilis Honor’s emphasis, tone or manner to impress upon his words any other than their recognized signification. And it is certainly not our duty or our pleasure, by a strained construction of his language, to put His Honor in fault.

There is no error. This will bo certified, &c.

Pee Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,095,604
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,028,376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,401,436
<PP&E>                                         41,953,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (674,791)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 48,735,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,952,842
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,544
<OTHER-SE>                                     (908,949)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   48,735,562
<SALES>                                        521,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               521,310 
<CGS>                                          3,171,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,520,797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,031,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,201,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,201,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,201,817)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.28)
        


</TABLE>
<Page>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walter S. Berman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/Walter S. Berman
Name:  Walter S. Berman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 31, 2003
**ALLIED
      SECURITY INNOVATIONS, INC.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Allied Security Innovations, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Michael Pellegrino, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Allied Security Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by Allied Security
      Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.


Date:
                          November 8, 2007/s/ Michael
                          PellegrinoMichael
                          Pellegrino
                          Chief Financial
                            Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


                  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph A. Garcia, Chief Financial Officer, Executive
Vice President and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





                                     Joseph A. Garcia
                                     Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice
                                     President and Secretary
                                     August 12, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. and will be retained by Spanish
Broadcasting System, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, William L.
Walton, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William L. WaltonName:
    William L. WaltonDate: March 2, 2009
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

|                                 |                         |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|
| SECRETARY OF LABOR,             |                         |
| Complainant,                    |                         |
| v.                              | OSHRC Docket No.18-0758 |
| ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC., |                         |
| Respondent.                     |                         |

BRIEFING NOTICE

Theparties are requested to brief the issues presented in theRespondent’s petition for discretionary review. The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the Commission on review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be filed within 40 days of this notice. A partynot intendingto file a brief must notify the Commission in writingwithinthe applicable time for filingbriefs, andshall serve a copy on all other parties.The time for filing briefs (or similar notices ofintent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated:November 1, 2019/s/

John X. Cerveny

Executive Secretary

----

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2220]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   BREAST CANCER AWARENESS AND BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL'S LYNNE 
                            CANCER INSTITUTE

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. RON KLEIN

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, October 3, 2008

  Mr. KLEIN of Florida. Madam Speaker, today I rise to recognize the 
month of October as Breast Cancer Awareness Month, and to commend the 
Boca Raton Community Hospital for its renewed efforts to fight breast 
cancer and to raise awareness of this disease.
  Breast cancer claims the lives of thousands of our mothers, daughters 
and sisters each year. The disease is the second most common type of 
cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer death. Yet, if 
discovered early breast cancer can be treated and the victim's chances 
of survival greatly increased.
  Currently, 61 percent of breast cancers are diagnosed at a localized 
stage, due largely to early detection by mammography screening and 
improvements in treatment.
  In October, the Boca Raton Community Hospital hosts its 5th annual Go 
Pink Cancer Awareness Luncheon and later this year, the hospital will 
open the Eugene and Christine Lynne Cancer Institute at the Sandler 
Pavilion. This 98,000-square-foot facility will house oncology, 
chemotherapy and clinical research that will lead the fight against 
cancer in my South Florida community.
  With over 20 oncology physicians, the Institute will treat over 3,000 
patients each year. These outstanding physicians and early detection 
programs will allow more breast cancer patients and their families win 
the battle against this disease.
  Like many other families in my community, mine has been affected by 
breast cancer. This month allows each and every one of us to remember 
those who died from this disease and celebrate the triumph of those who 
have survived. I look forward to continuing the fight against cancer 
here in Congress and at home in South Florida.

                          ____________________
```
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(2006/C 67/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)  The scheme and all individual measures based on it lasting beyond 31 December 2006 will be adapted in accordance with the rules applicable following a review of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001. The obligation includes to inform the European Commission of amendments pursuant to Regulation 70/2001 or its successor.

(2)  EUR 359,03 million earmarked for the contractual period to 31 December 2006

(3)  EUR 33,07 million earmarked for the contractual period to 31 December 2006

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 646 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-300, K2025-298.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26577 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC.
(the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

February 27, 2008



/s/ Philip L. GouldingPhilip L. Goulding Principal Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 30, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40133

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JONATHAN BISHOP, also known as Willie Bruce Allen,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:99-CR-97-1

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jonathan Bishop appeals the 24-month sentence imposed

following the revocation of supervised release. He contends that

the district court erred by finding that the conduct that

resulted in revocation, possession of a small amount of cocaine,

was a Grade B violation rather than a Grade C violation. 

A conviction for possession of any amount of cocaine could

have resulted in Bishop’s imprisonment for more than one year

under Texas law. See TEXAS HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 481.112; TEXAS PENAL

CODE § 12.35(a). The conduct therefore constituted a Grade B
No. 06-40133

-2-

violation, and the sentence was within the proper advisory

guidelines range. See U.S.S.G. §§ 7B1.1(a)(2), 7B1.4(a)(table). 

In any event, the sentence did not exceed the statutory

maximum, and the district court considered the sentencing factors

of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) when choosing the sentence. The sentence

was thus neither “unreasonable” nor “plainly unreasonable.” See

United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119-20 (5th Cir. 2005),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1804 (2006). 

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints RICHARD G. SMITH, JOHN H. KARR, AND DAWN
M. GRAY, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents,
with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American
Business Products, Inc., for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, and any
and all amendments to such Annual report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary
to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, lawfully may
do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

         This 11th day of February, 1998.



/S/ F. Duane Ackerman                        /S/ James F. McDonald
------------------------                     ---------------------------
F. Duane Ackerman                            James F. McDonald


/S/ W. Joseph Biggers                        /S/  Hollis L. Harris
------------------------                     ---------------------------
W. Joseph Biggers                            Hollis L. Harris


/S/ Thomas R. Carmody                        /S/ W. Stell Huie
------------------------                     ---------------------------
Thomas R. Carmody                            W. Stell Huie


/S/ Henry Curtis VII                         /S/ Thomas F. Keller
------------------------                     ---------------------------
Henry Curtis VII                             Thomas F. Keller


/S/ Daniel W. McGaughlin                     /S/ William B. Stokely, III
------------------------                     ---------------------------
Daniel W. McGaughlin                         William B. Stokely, III


/S/ C. Douglas Miller                        /S/ G. Harold Northrop
------------------------                     ---------------------------
C. Douglas Miller                            G. Harold Northrop
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

THE DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY,

and its successors,

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 11-2556

BRIEFING NOTICE 

 The Commission requests that the parties brief the issue of whether the judge erred in

concluding that 29 C.F.R. § 1910.266(d)(6)(i) (work areas in logging operations) did not apply to 

the cited condition. In so doing, the parties should address the standard’s definition of “logging 

operations” in its entirety, including the phrase “to the point of delivery.” 29 C.F.R. 

§ 1910.266(c). 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing 

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of 

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: August 22, 2013 __/s/_____________________________ 

Ray H. Darling, Jr. 

Executive Secretary 

 

1

 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.