alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
*  Note:  This Form 10-QSB Cover Page reflects the proper cover
page that should have been included in the Registrant's previous
quarterly filing, which was incorrectly filed with a Form 10-Q
Cover Page.  The remainder of the Registrant's quarterly report
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 remains
unchanged.

                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          Washington, D.C.
_________________________________________________________________

                          FORM 10-QSB

[  ]  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE
      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

      For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1998

[  ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
      THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from __________ to _____________.

              Commission File Number: 0-24926
                                      -------

                      CECIL BANCORP, INC.
                      -------------------
    (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


      Maryland                                   52-1883546
      --------                                   ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)            Identification Number)


    127 North Street
    Elkton, Maryland                                21921
    ----------------                                -----
  (Address of principal                           (Zip Code)
  executive office)

                         410 398-1650
                        --------------
               (Registrant's Telephone Number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

         Yes   X            NO    
            -------            -------


           Number of shares outstanding of common stock 
                    as of March 31, 1998

$0.01 par value common stock                  470,182 shares
----------------------------                  --------------
         class                                 outstanding 

                              
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
               CECIL BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


                           SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                            CECIL BANCORP, INC.



Date: June 30, 1998         By: /s/  Mary Beyer Halsey       
                                ----------------------
                                Mary Beyer Halsey
                                President
                                Chief Executive Officer
United States Steel Corporation – Minntac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request

April 24, 2012

Item 7

The facility's Best Available Retrofit Technology report, available on the Minnesota

Pollution Control Agency Regional Haze website ("BART report"), discusses the low

efficiency of the facility's wet scrubbers for SO2. Provide all documentation, including reports 

and studies, to determine the current SO2 efficiency of all water scrubbers at the facility. 

Additionally, provide all documents, including reports and studies, completed for the technical 

feasibility of efficiency upgrades for each scrubber.

Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or 

were consulted in the preparation of the response:

Stephani Campbell, Chrissy Bartovich

Answer:

Two reports related to scrubber efficiency were found and have been included and are provided 

as PDFs in this subfolder. In general, increasing the SO2 scrubbing efficiency of the existing 

scrubbers poses several issues. 

First, if more SO2 is removed from the airstream, there will be a corresponding increase in the

sulfate level of the water. When the Line 3 scrubber was added in 2006, air permitting did not 

present any unqiue issues; however water permitting posed a challenge. A scrubber blowdown 

treatment system was installed with water permit requirements for no net increase in sulfate and 

hardness. If SO2 removal efficiency was increased in the Lines 4-7 scrubbers through the 

addition of lime or other chemicals, water permitting would be difficult, if not practicably 

infeasible, because of the corresponding increase in sulfate in the wastewater stream. The Lines 

4-7 scrubbers are a once through system utilizing over 2000 gpm of water. This would create a 

stream which poses technical issues to treat, and likely would be economically and practicably 

infeasible.

Second, as experienced in both the Line 3 scrubber at Minntac and the Phase II scrubber at 

Keetac, the addition of lime to a scrubber for pH control to remove additional SO2 creates an 

issue of scaling. If the pH scale goes to the basic side, calcium sulfate can precipate in the 

scrubber which creates a hard scale. The scale covers the walls and begins to plug the nozzles 

which reduces the water flow through the scrubber. This causes both maintenance and 

operational issues which results in downtime to clean out the scrubber.
November 4`t', ?010 

To: Lisa P . Jackson 

Administrator 

United States Environment Protection Agency 

Fr: Pau I Orth 

Clear Channel Communications 

Eau Claire, W1 

Dear his . Jackson, 

' 11 

2010 NOV -9 AM 8: 16 

0r-I; ;_ G~ , HQ UTI'1~ Sc~~~Tw~~T 

I am contacting to you today to show my support of the NRECA petition dealing with the 

National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal 

Combustion Engines that was filed with your office in late October. 

We have four local radio stations located on cooperative power lines in Dunn County. "Kis. As is 

necessary for many businesses, back up power supply in the face of an outage is a must . When we 

are experiencing weather that could produce an outage, that's when our services come in most 

necessary. An added bonus to having a backup generator is our cooperatives peak shaving 

program. Participating in this saves us approximately, $14,000 per year. 

The rules your agency are trying to start will take away that peak alert rate my Cooperative can 

offer. That sort of penalty, that you're creating, will negatively effect not only our business and 

employees, but our local economy as well . 

I'd like your agency to reconsider not allowing peak shaving controls of generators like mine 

within the proposed 100 hour limits . The request NRECA filed does not ask for more hours of 

operation; just to include peak shaving use within the 100 hour limit. Since I'm a part of a 

Cooperative I see the savings and revenue from this type of arrangement, not them . Plus, we are 

helping to reduce energy demand during the peak times . This is a significant savings to our 

business . 

Sincerely, 

GZ 

Paul Orth 

Clear Channel Communications 

Lau Claire, WI 
o ~n 

; d,c~ v 

O oi 

O 

- 

SSdIO iStlld 

Q31210S32dd 

U 

C 

U 

O 

Qr 

L 

O 

Z 

U 

Q) CD 

. U 

O f~ - 

O N 

n fC Y ~ ~~ + 

C f6'53 N c 

E ~, o _ C ~ 

t 

~ 

r 

c ~ 

Au 

Ocv ~ J 

WQQ~S 1' 

- 

O -Fn 11
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 87 (Tuesday, May 6, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 25682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2013-23804]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 98

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0028; FRL-9845-6]
RIN 2060-AR61

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Final Amendments and 
Confidentiality Determinations for Subpart I

Correction

    In rule document 2013-23804 appearing on pages 68162 through 68238 
in the issue of Wednesday, November 13, 2013, make the following 
corrections.
    1. On page 68203, Equation I-8 is corrected as set forth below.

Sec.  98.93  Calculating GHG emissions [Corrected]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06MY14.001

    2. On page 68205, Equation I-15 is corrected as set forth below.
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06MY14.002
    
    3. On page 68209, Equation I-23 is corrected as set forth below.
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06MY14.003
    
[FR Doc. C1-2013-23804 Filed 5-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
#### HENRY COBB & W. G. COBB Adm’rs of John Cobb v. MARY GRAY and others.

*•Legislative Seale for Confederate Money*— Note *in Substitution of Prior Note.*

A note executed in 1863, for the balance 'doe upon a note executed in 1863,’(such iiew nothbeinggiven because of-alack of space on the old' note for the entry of a credit) is not subject to the legislative scale for Confederate monéy. ■

*<Cable*v. *Hardin,*67 fST. 0. *m*; *King*y. *W. & W. R. R. Co.*01 U. S. Rep. 1, cit.ed and distinguished.)

Civil Action, commenced in a Justice’s Court and tried ■on appeal,at Fall Term, 1877, of Alamance Superior Court,' before Buxton, *J.*

A jury trial being waived, His Honor found the facts as follows:— In 1853, Mary, Margaret and Phoebe Gray gave their note to the plaintiff’s intestate and made several payments which were credited thereon, and in January, 1863, they went to him tp make another payment of $200, but there being no space on which to enter -.the credit, a new note under seal was .executed, for the balance due, less the $200 payment, and signed'by said‘Mary and- Margaret, and bhe husband of said Phoebe (who was then married) and made payable to plaintiff’s intestate, who received it in substitution of the old note which was surrendered to the makers. The new note is now in suit. In August, 1866, the defendants paid to plaintiff’s intestate more than was due •on said note-if it was subject to scale as of January, 1863. but less than was due, if it was not subject to be scaled. The-Court held that although the note .was dated in January, 1863, .and payable one day after .date, yet it was not payable in Confederate money, nor subject to the legislative scale upon the facts found, and gave judgment for the plaintiff', from which the defendants appealed.

*95*Mr. J. A. Gilmer,*for plaintiff.

*Mr. J. JE.*Boyd, for defendants.

Faircloth, J.

(After stating the facts as above.) We agree with His Honor in holding that said note is not liable to the scale. The case of *Cable*v. Hardin, 67 N. C. 472, is not in point. There, it was held from the manifest intent of the parties that the transaction was a new loan, and the scale applied. Here, the debtors did not propose or intend to pay the whole debt, but only a part of it; and the new note was not made for the benefit of the creditor, nor upon any idea of a loan of that amount of money, but because there was not room on the old note to enter the credit. No. Yation is not to be presumed, unless the intention to novate •clearly results from the act of the pai’ties. The intention to •do so does not appear in this ease, but it appears to the contrary; and the transaction in August, 1866, between the same parties shows that they did not intend or understand that the scale was applicable. The over-payment is not alleged to have been made by mistake, &c.

The case of *King*v. *W. & W. R. R. Co.*91 U. S. Rep. 1, does not apply for the reason that the contract was that payment should be in Confederate currency.

No error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
# Commissioners' Monthly Case Activity Report

To view PDF files:** **

 

 

Last Updated: April 02, 2024
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11
 
                              POLYMER GROUP, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED   SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                            -------------------  ----------------
                                            JULY 4,   JUNE 28,   JULY 4, JUNE 28,
                                              1998      1997      1998     1997
                                            --------- ---------  ------- --------
<S>                                         <C>       <C>        <C>     <C>
Basic:
  Net income applicable to common stock.... $   6,240 $   6,012  $ 5,807 $10,974
  Weighted average shares outstanding......    32,000    32,000   32,000  32,000
  Net income per common share--basic....... $    0.20 $    0.19  $  0.18 $  0.34
Diluted:
  Net income applicable to common stock.... $   6,240 $   6,012  $ 5,807 $10,974
  Weighted average shares outstanding......    32,000    32,000   32,000  32,000
  Net income per common share--diluted..... $    0.20 $    0.19  $  0.18 $  0.34
</TABLE>
Argued and submitted September 5,

reversed and remanded November 26, 1979,

reconsideration denied May 9,

petition for review allowed July 17, 1980

#### WASHINGTON SQUARE, INC., *Respondent, v.*FIRST LADY BEAUTY SALONS, INC., et al, *Appellants.*

(No. 42093, CA 13158)

602 P2d 1083

John R. Faust, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for lellants. With him on the brief was Janice M. ;wart, Portland.

Charles R. Markley, Portland, argued the cause for pondent. With him on the brief was Souther, aulding, Kinsey, Williamson & Schwabe, Portland.

Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Lee and hardson, Judges.

*270LEE, J.

*271LEE, J.

Plaintiff brought this FED action to recover posses-on of commercial premises leased for more than one ear. Defendants appeal from the trial court’s judg-ient for plaintiff. We reverse and remand.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the ial court erred in striking their third and fourth ffirmative defenses. Defendants’ third affirmative ifense was that their failure to make timely pay-tents of rent was due to "excusable accident or mis-tke.” The fourth affirmative defense was that plain-ff was estopped to terminate the tenancy. Both de-mses were based upon the allegation that, although te lease required payment of rent on the first day of ich month without notice or demand, the parties had illowed the practice of plaintiff sending defendants onthly invoices for the rent and certain other larges and of defendants making payments after ceiving the invoices. Under that practice, the rent as generally not paid by the beginning of the month which it was due.

Plaintiff agrees that the stricken defenses are of a nd generally cognizable in FED proceedings. *See, g., Caine v. Powell,*185 Or 322, 202 P2d 931 (1949). owever, plaintiff argues that defenses based on a ndlord’s prior history of accepting late rental pay-ents are precluded as a matter of law by ORS .090.1 It is unnecessary to decide whether plaintiff is rrect, because plaintiff’s right of termination here is »verned by relevant provisions of the lease agree*272ment rather than by the statute. *Cf. Fry v. D. M. Overmyer Co., Inc.,*269 Or 281, 306, 525 P2d 140 (1974).

We conclude that the defendants were entitled to attempt to prove their third and fourth affirmative defenses, and the trial court erred in striking them.

Reversed and remanded.

1

 ORS 91.090 provides:

> "The failure of a tenant to pay the rent reserved by the terms of his lease for the period of 10 days, unless a different period is stipulated in the lease, after it becomes due and payable, operates to terminate his tenancy. No notice to quit or pay the rent is required to render the holding of such tenant thereafter wrongful; however, if the landlord, after such default in payment of rent, accepts payment thereof, the lease is reinstated for the full period fixed by its terms, subject to termination by subsequent defaults in payment of rent.”
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on September 30, 2021
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
18-0758
RoadSafe Traffic Systems, Inc.
10/30/19
DFR
11/01/19
Closed

2
17-0737
UHS of Westwood Pembroke, Inc.
UHS of Delaware, Inc.
03/19/20
DFR
03/25/20
Closed

3
18-1451
Summit Contracting Group, Inc.
08/24/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

4
16-1713
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

5
16-1813
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

6
16-1872
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

7
17-0023
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

8
17-0279
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

9
16-1865
AJM Packaging Corporation
10/07/20
DFR
10/14/20
Closed

10
19-0723
Midwest Equipment Company
10/23/20
DFR
11/25/20
Closed

11
16-1587
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc. 
11/18/20
DFR
12/10/20
Closed

12 
18-1864
Henkels & McCoy, Inc.
12/07/20
DFR
12/23/20
Closed

13
18-0242
Onekey, LLC
02/05/21
DFR
02/18/21
Open

14 
18-0731
UHS of Delaware, Inc. and Premier Behavioral Health Solutions of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Suncoast Behavioral Health Center
05/19/21
DFR
05/21/21
Open

15
18-1287
First Marine, LLC
05/19/21
DFR
05/27/21
Open

16
18-1288
First Marine, LLC
05/19/21
DFR
05/27/21
Open

 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2371-E2372]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       COMMEMORATING THE 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE SPECIAL OLYMPICS

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JOE SESTAK

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. SESTAK. Madam Speaker, today I rise to acknowledge the 40th 
anniversary of the Special Olympics, an outstanding organization which 
provides children and adults with intellectual disabilities--more than 
18,000 alone in Pennsylvania--an opportunity to participate in year-
round, athletic competitions. The Special Olympics motto ``Let me win, 
but if I cannot win, let me be brave in the attempt,'' was originally 
spoken by gladiators entering the arena in ancient Rome.
  Villanova University, which is in my district, was the official host 
of the Special Olympics Pennsylvania state games this year. The Special 
Olympics Fall Festival at Villanova is the largest student-run Special 
Olympics event in the world. During the two-day event, Villanova 
University opens its campus to over 1,000 athletes, 400 coaches, and 
2,700 volunteers. The athletes compete in six Olympic-type sports, 
bocce, long distance running, power-lifting, roller skating, soccer, 
and volleyball.
  Worldwide, the Special Olympics brings together more than 2.5 million 
athletes with intellectual disabilities in 180 countries. Children and 
adults who participate in the Special Olympics develop improved 
physical fitness and motor skills, greater self-confidence, and a more 
positive self-image. They grow mentally and socially and, exhibit 
boundless courage and enthusiasm, enjoy the rewards of friendship, and 
ultimately discover new abilities and talents.
  Special Olympics was best described by Sargent Shriver, Chairman of 
the Board of Special Olympics Inc., when he wrote that Special Olympics 
is unique and important because of the ways in which Special Olympics 
inspires and reveals the very best in human nature. ``It has become,'' 
he wrote, ``one of the most encouraging and profound developments in 
modern sports.''

[[Page E2372]]

  I am pleased to recognize Special Olympics International for 40 years 
of service and commitment, and I wish the organization success in the 
years ahead.

                          ____________________
```
Appendix A: Subject Code Identification

A-1

Subject Code Definition Responsible AD/RD/SOH1

ADS Administrative Services Office of Administration

AML Abandoned Mine Lands Program Support Directorate

BFM Budget: Funds Management Office of Planning, Analysis, Budget 

EEO Equal Employment Opportunity Office for Equal Opportunity

FIN Financial Management Finance and Acquisition Directorate

GMT Grants Management Program Program Support Directorate

INE Inspection and Enforcement Program Support Directorate

INF Information Services and Information Resources Office 

Program Promotion 

IT Information Technology Information Resources Office

OPM Organizational Planning and Office of Administration 

Management

PER Personnel Office of Human Resources

PRC Procurement and Contracting Finance and Acquisition Directorate

REG Regulatory Program Development Program Support Directorate

STP State and Tribal Programs Program Support Directorate

TGR Technical Guidance and Research Program Support Directorate

TSR Technical Services and Research Program Support Directorate

1 The managers of these program areas are generally responsible for the subject codes identified. However, there are 

some exceptions, and these directives will have a different responsible party listed at the end of the base directive in

the “Contact” section.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-11-0332

SAT Date: 5/17/2011

Print Date: 8/3/2012

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 21

Exposure Based Review:

Health: Yes Exposure based testing (health): No testing desired for toxicity but material 

should be tested to identify 

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: Forward

Keywords:

 Keywords: UNCERT-MUTA/LUNG

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-11-0332

FATE: Estimations for low weight MW 266 

Liquid with MP = 10 C (M, Pour Point)

log Kow = 7.91 (E) 

S = 0.005 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP = 6.3E-6 torr at 25 C (E)
BP = 363 C (E)

H = 5.87E-4 (E)

log Koc = 5.62 (E)

log Fish BCF = 3.68 (E)

log Fish BAF = 4.33(E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg ≥ mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 3 hrs

Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 7 da

Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 3.7 hr via OH radical

PBT Potential: P2B2

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption of the low molecular weight species is poor 

all routes based on analogs. There is uncertain concern for mutagenicity based on the MSDS 

and by analogy to which gave a weak positive response when tested at 20% 

concentration in other petroleum distillates in strain TA98 (only strain tested). There is also a 

potential as an aspiration hazard if handled at elevated temperatures when the material is a less 

viscous material. The MSDS states that are present that are animal carcinogens but 

specific chemicals were not identified. Low moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; 

SAR chemical class = hydrocarbon; MW 421 (low-weight); log Kow = 7.91 (EPI low-weight); 

pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; 

hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments
Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs neutral organic chemicals

SAR Class hydrocarbon

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones