alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JUNE TERM, 1853.

#### M. A. H. McKIEL, ADM’R., &c., *against*CATHERINE CUTLER.

Under the 47th section of the Rev. Stát., ch. 31, no person can he allowed to sue *in forma pauperis,*in a merely representative character.

This was an appeal from an interlocutory order made by Battle, J., at the Pall Term, 1852) of the Court of Equity foi Beaufort County, by which his Honor had refused to dispauper the plaintiff.

All-the facts necessary to an understanding of the case, sufficiently appear in the opinion delivered by this Court.

Donnell, for the plaintiff.

Rodman, for.the defendant.

Battle, J.

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order of the Court of Equity for the County, of Beaufort, refusing to dis-pauper the plaintiff, suing as tne administrator of Bryan Cutler, deceased. An order had been -made on the filing of the bill, per-initting him to sue *in formdpauperis-,*upon his affidavit, that the *140estate of his intestate was insolvent, except as to its interest in the property sued for. Upon the coming in of the answer the motion was made, from the refusal to grant which, the appeal was taken. We think the motion was a proper one and ought to have been allowed.

The permission to sue *in forma*pauperis, was founded upon the provision in the 47th section of the 31st chapter of the Revised Statutes, which is in the following words : *“*Every poor person or p'ersons which have or hereafter shall, have cause of action or« -actions against any other person or persons, either in law or equity, shall have at the discretion of any one of the Judges of the Supreme or Superior Courts, a writ or writs at law, or writ of subpoena in equity, according to the nature of their causes, paying no costs on the same, nor giving any security therefor,” *&c.*This enactment was taken from the statute, 11 H. VII, ch. 12, and *mutatis mutandis,*is substantially the same. The construction which has been put upon the English statute, may therefore very properly be applied to ours. The authorities referred to by the counsel, very clearly show that'it is well settled in England, that no person can sue *in forma*pauperis, in a merely representative 'character. *Paradise*v. *Shephard,*1 Dick. Rep. 136. 1 Daniel’s Ch. Prac. 42. And a very good reason may be given for it, to wit,'that though the estate in right of which the executor or administrator wishes to sue may be insolvent, the creditors,legatees or next of kin, for whose benefit the suit is to be brought, may be amply able to give security and pay costs.

The order in this case having been improvidently granted, ought to have been rescinded upon the defendant’s motion ; .and the refusal to do so was erroneous. The interlocutory order must be reversed, and the opinion will be certified as the law directs. „

Pee Curiam. Order reversed.
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on December 31, 2017
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
09-1901
Seward Ship’s Drydock, Inc.
11/14/11
DFR
11/21/11, 04/17/13
Closed

2
08-1774
Angelica Textile Services, Inc.
09/28/12
DFR
10/16/12
Closed

3
11-2395
Kiewit Power Constructors Co.
01/24/13
DFR
03/04/13
Closed

4
11-1734
Calpine Corporation
06/24/13
DFR
06/26/13
Closed

5
10-0637
BP Products North America, Inc., & BP-Husky Refining, LLC
09/16/13
DFR
11/01/13
Closed

6
12-1600
Envision Waste Services
02/10/14
DFR
02/24/14
04/16/14
Closed

7
12-2142
Meadows Construction Company, LLC
06/05/14
DFR
06/24/14
Closed

8
12-1617
Houston Aquarium, Inc.
09/18/14
DFR
10/20/14
Closed

9
13-1022
Mid South Waffles, Inc., d/b/a Waffle House #1283
12/31/14
DFR
02/03/15
Closed

10
14-0948
Florida Gas Contractors, Inc.
01/15/15
DFR
02/06/15
Closed

11
12-1287
CSA Equipment Company, LLC
01/16/15
DFR
02/09/15
Closed

12
13-0224
A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc.
03/23/15
DFR
04/08/15
Closed

13
13-1817
Missouri Basin Well Service Inc.
04/23/15
DFR
05/07/15
Closed

14
14-0844
Quick Transport of Arkansas, LLC
07/01/15
DFR
07/28/15
Closed

15
13-1124
Integra Health Management, Inc.
07/21/15
DFR
09/18/15
Closed

16
13-0900
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc.
08/31/15
DFR
09/18/15
Closed

17
13-1169
North Eastern Precast LLC
10/29/15
DFR
11/02/15
Closed

18
13-1170
Masonry Services Inc. dba MSI
10/29/15
DFR
11/02/15
Closed

19
13-0644
Wynnewood Refining Co., LLC
03/03/16
DFR
03/18/16
Closed

20
13-0791
Wynnewood Refining Co., LLC
03/03/16
DFR
03/18/16
Closed

21
14-1688
Science Applications International Corp., d/b/a SAIC
06/23/16
DFR
10/31/16
Closed

22
15-1121
Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.
06/30/16
DFR
11/09/16
Closed

23
14-1268
Dover High Performance Plastics
07/19/16
DFR
11/01/16
Closed

24
15-1347
Gate Precast Company
11/10/16
DFR
12/05/16
Closed

25
 16-1533
Cooper/T. Smith Corporation, d/b/a Blakeley Boatworks, Inc.
 04/27/17
DFR
04/27/17
Closed




26
16-0803
The Lane Construction Corporation 
05/23/17
DFR
09/14/17
Open

27
16-1167
Aerospace Testing Alliance
8/22/17
DFR
11/20/17
Open

28
15-1069
Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc.
10/27/17
DFR
11/13/17
Open

29
16-0940
Angel Brothers Enterprises, Ltd.
11/17/17
DFR
12/15/17
Open

 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 955

To allow the National Park Service to acquire certain land for addition

to the Wilderness Battlefield in Virginia, as previously authorized by

law, by purchase or exchange as well as by donation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 4, 1999

Mr. WARNER (for himself, Mr. ROBB, and Mr. MCCONNELL) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To allow the National Park Service to acquire certain land

for addition to the Wilderness Battlefield in Virginia,

as previously authorized by law, by purchase or exchange

as well as by donation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITION TO WILDERNESS BATTLEFIELD, VIR4 GINIA.

5 (a) REMOVAL OF CONDITION ON BATTLEFIELD AD6 DITION.—Section 2(a)(2) of Public Law 102–541 (16

7 U.S.C. 525k note; 106 Stat. 3565) is amended by striking

8 ‘‘: Provided,’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Interior’’.
2

•S 955 IS

1 (b) AUTHORIZED METHODS OF ACQUISITION.—

2 (1) ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LANDS BY DONA3 TION.—Section 3(a) of Public Law 101–214 (16

4 U.S.C. 425l(a)) is amended by adding at the end the

5 following new sentence: ‘‘However, the lands des6 ignated ‘P04–04’ on the map referred to in section

7 2(a) numbered 326–40072E/89/A and dated Sep8 tember 1990 may be acquired only by donation.’’.

9 (2) REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON ACQUISITION

10 OF ADDITION.—Section 2 of Public Law 102–541

11 (16 U.S.C. 525k note; 106 Stat. 3565) is amended

12 by striking subsection (b).

13 (c) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 2(a) of Pub14 lic Law 101–214 (16 U.S.C. 425k(a)) is amended by strik15 ing ‘‘Spotslyvania’’ and inserting ‘‘Spotsylvania’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 190 (Tuesday, December 23, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10979]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           RECESS UNTIL FRIDAY, DECEMBER 26, 2008, AT 11 A.M.

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 
Senate stands in recess until Friday, December 26, 2008, at 11 a.m.
  Thereupon, the Senate, at 11 and 40 seconds a.m., recessed until 
Friday, December 26, 2008, at 11 a.m.
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polymer Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended October 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Veronica M. Hagen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
November 12, 2009

/s/ VERONICA M. HAGEN Veronica M. Hagen Chief Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    140,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               238,979
<PP&E>                                         692,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                 413,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 581,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          193,327
<BONDS>                                        186,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     33,542
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   581,504
<SALES>                                        677,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               677,004
<CGS>                                          136,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,279
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                368,483
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,727
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            366,756
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   366,756
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: Barnett, Keith

Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 1:58 PM

To: Land, Eva

Cc: Teal, Kim

Subject: RE: Emission Calculations for Airless and Air Assisted Spray Guns

Attachments: autbody.pdf

Dear Eva:

I apologize for taking so long to respond to this

– my technical expert has been on sick leave and tired up

in a rulemaking with a court ordered deadline.

A quick review of the information you sent implies that you were correct that the fallout factor looks too

high. My understanding is that a fallout fact or represents the amount of coating solids that end up on

the part, the floor, the spray gun operator, the walls, ceiling, etc. A fallout factor of 98.56 implies that

only 1.44 percent of the sprayed solids exit the spray both. That seems very high based o n a

conversation with Kim Teal (my coatings expert).

I have attached a document that explains fall out factors in more detail and has recommended values

(see page 12). I noticed that you can have values as high as 91 percent based on this reference

– but the

factor is very much influenced by the type of spray gun and the type of spray booth.

Hope this helps.

Keith Barnett

Group Leader

Minerals and Manufacturing Group

919

- 541

- 5605

From: Land, Eva

Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 4:21 PM

To: Barnett, Keith

C c: King, Melanie

Subject: RE: Emission Calculations for Airless and Air Assisted Spray Guns

Here is a better electronic version. The emission calculations are on page 98, Appendix B.

Eva Land

Air Permits Section

EPA

- Region 4

61 Forsyth St., SW

Atlanta , GA 30303

Phone: 404

- 562

- 9103

From: Barnett, Keith

Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 3:24 PM

To: Land, EvaCc: King, Melanie

Subject: Emission Calculations for Airless and Air Assisted Spray Guns

The person who normally answers these questions is out on extended sick leave

– I am checking to see

who else may have knowledge. Could you send the interesting calculations?

Keith Barnett

Group Leader

Minerals and Manufacturing Group

919

- 541

- 5605

From: King, Melanie

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 1:37 PM

To: Land, Eva; Barnett, Keith

Subject: RE: Personnel Question

We probably do within our division, but I don’t think anyone in my group does. Keith, do you have

someone in your group that might have th is expertise, or know who in SPPD would?

Melanie

From: Land, Eva

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 1:33 PM

To: King, Melanie

Subject: Personnel Question

Hey Melanie,

I am working on a permit application that has some interesting emission calculations fo r their painting

operations. I was wondering if you know someone in your section that has a lot of knowledge about

calculating emissions from airless and air assisted spray guns?

Thanks.

Eva Land

Air Permits Section

EPA

- Region 4

61 Forsyth St., SW

Atlanta, GA 30303

Phone: 404

- 562

- 9103
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E34]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      INTRODUCING THE CRITICAL ELECTION INFRASTRUCTURE ACT OF 2008

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. ALCEE L. HASTINGS

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, January 7, 2009

  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Madam Speaker, I rise today to introduce the 
Critical Election Infrastructure Act of 2009.
  This legislation is a necessary and vital investment in our citizens 
and the future of our democracy. This bill authorizes $1 billion to 
states and local governments over the next four years for the 
acquisition of additional voting systems and equipment, improving 
training of election administration officials, upgrading existing 
election equipment, and allocating additional election administration 
officials to polling places serving greater numbers of voters. This 
funding is essential to improve efficiency and fairness in the 
operation of polling places in federal elections.
  President Dwight Eisenhower once said, ``The future of this republic 
is in the hands of the American voter.'' In the 2008 Presidential 
election, an astounding 130 million people voted and, even more 
exciting, an unprecedented number of youth and minorities lined up at 
the polls to participate in the electoral process, many for the first 
time. While this increased turnout is emblematic of our nation's 
commitment to our future, in some parts of the country it caused undue 
difficulties.
  For example, throughout South Florida and elsewhere in the country, 
hundreds of thousands of voters found themselves waiting on 
interminable lines, sometimes for over five hours. Five hours! Forced 
to stand in the heat and during Florida's famous afternoon 
thunderstorms with little food and water, voters are to be commended 
for their civic commitment. But American citizens should not have to 
face such difficulties when exercising their sacred right to vote.
  Elections officials simply did not have enough equipment and trained 
personnel on the ground to speedily and effectively handle such large 
numbers of voters. Clearly what is needed is more: more polling booths, 
more trained workers, more equipment, and more polling locations and 
facilities to handle increasing numbers of voters.
  Madam Speaker, voting should not be a right granted only to those who 
can stand in line the longest or can go the longest without food or a 
bathroom break. Voting is the sacred right of all eligible citizens. We 
have a solemn responsibility to ensure the greatest possible access to 
exercise that right. Authorizing funding for the necessary equipment 
and personnel is an essential first step in that process. I urge my 
colleagues to support this legislation.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H24]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 11 of rule X, clause 11 
of rule I, and the order of the House of today, the Chair announces the 
Speaker's appointment of the following Members of the House to the 
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence:
  Mr. Reyes, Texas, Chairman
  Mr. Hoekstra, Michigan

                          ____________________
```
ALASKA SEAFOOD CBI REPL AC EME NT PAG E

EPA- HQ

- OW -2013- 0652

DCN: 00304 CBI

THE FO LL OW ING H AS BEEN REMOVED BE CAUSE IT

CONT AINS CONF ID ENT IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA TIO N

(CB I) PER 40 CFR P ART 2, SU BP ART B

.
#### FREEMAN LEATH AND OTHERS *vs.*JACOB SUMMERS AND OTHERS.

December 1842.

In a petition to turn or change a public road, it must be alleged that the new road is necessary, or would he more useful to the public — otherwise the petition will he dismissed.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Caswell County, at Fall Term, 1842, his Honor Judge Settle presiding.

*109This was a petition to alter a public rood between certain *termini*designated in the petition, and was brought up by appeal to the Superior Court. The petitioners merely prayed for an alteration of the road without assigning any reasons therefor. A copy of the petition had been served on the defendant, who appeared and opposed it. At the hearing the counsel for the defendant moved to dismiss the petition, 1st, for the want of sufficient matter set forth in the petition to enable the court to found any decree thereon : 2ndly, because of a former decree on the same subject matter between ’.hese parties in the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions of Has well, at April Term, 1841; and, in support of the latter petition, he produced a petition and the records of the County Court, shewing a hearing of the petition at April Term aforesaid, upon the testimony of witnesses and argument of counsel, and a decree dismissing the said petition at the costs of the petitioners. His Honor being of opinion with the petitioners upon the latter question, refused the motion to dismiss upon that ground ; but, being satisfied that the petition was so defective as not to authorize any decree, directed the same to be dismissed at the costs of the petitioners. From this decree the petitioners appealed to the Supreme Court.

*W. H. Haywood*for the petitioners.

*Morehead*for the defendant.

Daniel, J.

This was a petition to turn a road. The defendants moved the court to dismiss it, because there was no allegation in it, that the new road was necessary, or would be more useful to the public, The court, for this reason, dismissed the petition, and the petitioners appealed. We are of opinion that the judgment of the court was correct. By the 1st section of the act, Rev. iSt. c. 104, s. 1, the County Court has power to order the laying out of public roads, *when necessary;*and to alter roads as often as occasion shall require, so as to make them *more useful.*The *110seeon<^' seeti°a of the said aet, after pointing out the mode of proceeding in petitions of this kind, authorizes the County Court “ to hear the allegations set forth in the said petition;" and, if sufficient reasons be shewn, the court has power to order the laying out or discontinuance of the said road, as the case may be. This petition has no general nor particular allegation in it, that the road, sought to be established, would either be necessary or useful to the public. The court, therefore, had no power to- hear witnesses to prove any thing, except the allegations set forth in the petition; ánd these allegations ought to be such as to make a proper ease, eoming within the meaning of the Aet of Assembly. The petitioners did not move to amend their petition. The judgment must be affirmed.

Pei. Curias®. Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         209,277
<SECURITIES>                                19,649,433
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,745,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                   300,823
<INVENTORY>                                 16,715,328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,964,475
<PP&E>                                      23,113,797
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,684,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,466,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,789,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,537,993
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,783,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                67,466,070
<SALES>                                     58,018,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,018,742
<CGS>                                       36,793,515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,793,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,412,371
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,108,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,224,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,884,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,884,488
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.46


</TABLE>