alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on March 31, 2019

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 14-1688

Science Applications 

International Corp., 

d/b/a SAIC

06/23/16 DFR 10/31/16 Closed

2 15-1121 Clean Fuels of 

Indiana, Inc. 06/30/16 DFR 11/09/16 Closed

3 14-1268 Dover High 

Performance Plastics 07/19/16 DFR 11/01/16 Closed

4 15-1347 Gate Precast Co. 11/10/16 DFR 12/05/16 Closed

5 16-1533

Cooper/T. Smith 

Corporation, d/b/a 

Blakeley Boatworks, 

Inc.

04/27/17 DFR 04/27/17 Closed

6 16-0803

The Lane 

Construction 

Corporation

05/23/17 DFR 09/14/17 Closed

7 16-1167 Aerospace Testing 

Alliance 08/22/17 DFR 11/20/17 Closed

8 15-1069 Healy Tibbitts 

Builders, Inc. 10/27/17 DFR 11/13/17 Closed

9 16-0940 Angel Brothers 

Enterprises, Ltd. 11/17/17 DFR 12/15/17 Closed

10 17-0190 Shelly & Sands, Inc. 05/02/18 DFR 05/10/18 Closed

11 15-1574

MasTec North 

America dba MasTec 

Advanced 

Technologies, Inc.

06/20/18 DFR 07/10/18 Open

12 17-0949 Walmart, Inc. 07/12/18 DFR 08/09/18 Closed

13 16-1587 TNT Crane & 

Rigging, Inc. 10/16/18 DFR 10/30/18 Closed

14 17-1214 Mansfield Industrial, 

Inc. 11/23/18 DFR 01/03/19 Open

15 17-0483 Ceco Concrete 

Construction, LLC 11/28/18 DFR 12/19/18 Open

16 16-1628 Schaad Detective 

Agency, Inc. 12/18/18 DFR 01/07/19 Open

17 17-1174 Wayne Farms, LLC 03/01/19 DFR 03/21/19 Open

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALASKA
AIRLINES, INC. 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         132,300
<SECURITIES>                                   196,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                       900
<INVENTORY>                                     29,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               577,200
<PP&E>                                       1,774,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 453,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,981,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          693,500
<BONDS>                                        337,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     668,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,981,200
<SALES>                                      1,680,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,680,800
<CGS>                                        1,504,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,504,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                196,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    77,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            119,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 679 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-343, K2025-341.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26622 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
ex10-8.htm


Exhibit 10.8


 


 


PROMISSORY NOTE













	
$1,200.00

	
April 5, 2010


	  	
Austin, Texas












FOR VALUE, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Restaurant Concepts of America, a Nevada company referred to as (“Borrower”), promises to pay to David Cho (“Lender”), or order, at Austin, Texas, or as otherwise instructed, the principal sum of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200.00) in lawful tender of the United States, together with simple interest thereon at an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%).







Terms of Repayment. This Promissory Note shall become due and payable together will all accrued interest on April 5, 2011.







Default.  Any one or more of the following events shall constitute a Default under the terms of this Note:








	
1)  

	
Borrower fail to make timely payment when due.








	
2)  

	
Borrower breaches an agreement or promise made to Lender, or fails to timely perform any obligation owing to Lender








	
3)  

	
Borrower makes any representation or statement to Lender that is false or misleading in any material manner.








	
4)  

	
Borrower becomes insolvent, or a receiver is appointed for any part of all of Borrower’s property, of Borrower makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or any proceeding is brought either by Borrower of against Borrower under any Bankruptcy or insolvency laws.












In the event of any default as described herein, Lender, without further protest, presentment or notice, may declare all sums due and payable, together with any interest then due.







Waiver.  Forbearance of any payment due of modification of any term of this Note by Lender in any manner shall not be deemed nor construed as a waiver of any other rights in favor of Lender under the terms of this Notice.







Legal.  This Note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of that State of Texas, which shall be the choice of jurisdiction and venue for purposes of enforcement of this Note.  If any action is brought to enforce any provision or collect on this Note, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement for all reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.








	  	
Restaurant Concepts of America


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
By: /s/ David Cho


	  	
       David Cho - President / CEO
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for February 28, 2019

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month					26

2. Cases Added to Docket						  0


  
3. Cases Subtracted From Docket					 -5

Suncor Energy (U.SA) Inc. 
No. 13-0900
Decision on February 1, 2019

Mid South Waffles, Inc. d/b/a Waffle House 1283
No. 13-1022
Decision on February 15, 2019

Houston Aquarium, Inc.
No. 12-1617
Decision on February 15, 2019

Florida Gas Contractors, Inc.
No. 14-0948
Decision on February 21 2019

A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc.
No. 13-0224
Decision on February 28, 2019
	

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month					21
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
            --------------------------------------------------------

Aceto Corporation
1 Hollow Lane
Lake Success, NY 11042

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-38679, 333-90929 and 333-110653) of Aceto
Corporation of our reports dated September 6, 2006, relating to the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2006, and the effectiveness of
Aceto Corporation's internal control over financial reporting at June 30, 2006,
which are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated September 6, 2006
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


BDO Seidman, LLP
401 Broadhollow Road
Melville, NY 11747

September 12, 2006
----

(2004/C 84 E/0757)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0770/04

by Seán Ó Neachtain (UEN) to the Commission

(5 March 2004)

Subject:   EU citizenship

By 1 May 2004, a number of urgent cases relating to EU citizenship will need to have been clarified. Will the Commission therefore state what are the EU citizenship rights after 1 May 2004 in the following two cases: first, a lady who was born in Russia, moved to Latvia and chose to stay there without citizenship and later married an EU citizen and moved to Ireland where she now has residency rights but requires a visa to travel outside Ireland and, second, Latvian citizens living in Ireland or in any other EU Member State, and their EU citizenship status?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(24 March 2004)

According to article 17 of the EC Treaty, every person holding the nationality of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union. Citizenship of the Union shall complement and not replace national citizenship.

In his first example, the Honourable Member seems to refer to the particular situation of stateless persons in Latvia. The Commission is fully aware of this situation. A woman born in Russia and residing in Latvia without citizenship who later marries an EU citizen and moves with him to Ireland, will only benefit from EU citizenship rights, in her own right, if she acquires EU citizenship herself either by marriage or by any other means laid down in the Member State's legislation on acquisition of citizenship. If she remains stateless or retains a third country nationality, she will still be a beneficiary of Community law on the right of free movement and residence and is entitled to reside in Ireland by virtue of being the spouse of an EU citizen.

If she wants to travel to another Member State from Ireland she will effectively require a visa, since Ireland does not apply, by its own choice, the Community legislation on uniform short-stay visas, external border controls and circulation within an area where internal border controls on persons have been abolished (‘Schengen acquis’). However, it should be stressed that, due to her status as the spouse of an EU citizen, she should be granted every facility for obtaining any necessary visas, which shall also be issued free of charge.

In the second example, the Latvian citizen living in Ireland or in any other Member State shall become an EU citizen as from accession of Latvia to the European Union on 1 May 2004 and shall benefit directly from the rights attached to EU citizenship as laid down in Part Two of the EC Treaty and, in particular, from the right to free movement and residence within the territory of the Member States (subject, where relevant, to applicable transitional measures for workers) and the right to vote and to stand as a candidate at municipal and European Parliament elections in the Member State where he resides.

----
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant, 

v. OSHRC Docket No. 14-0816 

MANSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE

With respect to Citation 1, Item 6, the Commission requests the parties to brief whether the 

judge erred in finding that Respondent failed to comply with 29 C.F.R. § 1926.1431(k)(3). In 

addressing this issue, the parties should address: 

1. Whether the Secretary established that Respondent failed to secure the platform to the 

structure where the work was being performed, as required by 29 C.F.R § 1926.1431(k)? 

2. Whether Respondent met the requirement(s) of the “greater hazard” exception in 29 C.F.R. 

§ 1926.1431(k)(3) (“Before employees exit or enter a hoisted personnel platform that is 

not landed, the platform must be secured to the structure where the work is to be performed, 

unless the employer can demonstrate that securing to the structure would create a greater 

hazard”) (emphasis added)? See Kaspar Electroplating Corp., 16 BNA OSHC 1517, 1522 

(No. 90-2866, 1993) (“[T]he party claiming the benefit of an exception to the requirements 

of a standard has the burden of proof on its claim.”). 

In addressing this question, the parties should address whether the judge erred in 

finding that the “greater hazard” exception in 29 C.F.R. § 1926.1431(k)(3) refers 

to the greater hazard affirmative defense, and therefore requires employers to 

establish all the elements of that defense? See Dole v. Williams Enters., Inc., 876 

F.2d 186, 188 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (quoting Lauhoff Grain Co., 13 BNA OSHC 1084, 

1088 (No. 81-0984, 1987) (Commission holding that to establish greater hazard 

defense, employer must show that “(1) the hazards of compliance with a standard 

are greater than the hazards of noncompliance, (2) alternative means of protection 

are unavailable, and (3) a variance was unavailable or inappropriate.”)). 
2 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1

 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing briefs, 

and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of intent) 

of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: February 2, 2017 /s/ 

 John X. Cerveny 

 Executive Secretary 

 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate. 
3
EXHIBIT
      23.1


**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**







AMERCO


Reno,
      NV







We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form S-3 (No. 333-10119, 333-73357, 333-48396 and 33-56571) of AMERCO and
      its consolidated entities of our reports dated June 10, 2006, relating to
      the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules, and
      the
      effectiveness of AMERCO and its consolidated entities internal control over
      financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.










/s/
      BDO
      Seidman, LLP








Los
      Angeles, California


June 10,
      2006
**Exhibit 21.1**

List ofSubsidiaries of the Company:
| Name of Entity                    | ** ** | **State of Incorporation** |
|-----------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|
|                              |       |                       |
| United Sugars Corporation         |       | Minnesota                  |
|                              |       |                       |
| Midwest Agri-Commodities Company  |       | Minnesota                  |
|                              |       |                       |
| ProGold Limited Liability Company |       | Minnesota                  |
|                              |       |                       |
| Crystech, LLC                     |       | Delaware                   |
|                              |       |                       |
| Sidney Sugars Incorporated        |       | Minnesota                  |
|                              |       |                       |
| Crab Creek Sugar Company          |       | Minnesota                  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration # 20703 and # 20704; SOUTH CAROLINA Disaster 
Number SC-20012]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of South Carolina

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 8.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of South Carolina (FEMA--4829-DR), dated 
September 29, 2024.
    Incident: Hurricane Helene.

DATES: Issued on October 23, 2024.
    Incident Period: September 25, 2024 through October 7, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: November 29, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 30, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Morgan, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of South Carolina, dated September 29, 2024, 
is hereby amended to update the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning September 25, 2024 and continuing through October 7, 2024.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-25354 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

RECEIVED 

OCT 1 4 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

In the Matter of Mountain Air Cargo, Inc., Docket No. FAA-2014-0111, Case 

No. 2013EA680043 

AGENCY'S REQUEST FOR ANOTHER ONE-WEEK EXTENSTION TO 

FILE REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORAMDUM 

IN RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DECISION 

The Agency, by counsel, hereby requests another one-week extension, to 

October 14, 2014, to file a reply to Respondent's Supplemental Memorandum 

in response to the Agency's Motion for Decision. The basis for this motion is as 

follows: 

(1) Under the Order Granting FAA Motion for Extension of Time To File a 

Reply, dated September 30, 2014, the Agency was granted an extension 

until October 7, 2014 to file the subject submission. 

(2) The previous Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply was based on 

the Agency's representation that the parties were engaged in settled 

discussions and had made significant progress in that respect, but some 

more time was needed. Since that time, the parties have actually come 

to a settlement agreement in principle, but just have to come to an 

agreement over the exact details of the language of the settlement 

agreement. It is anticipated that the parties will have a fully executed 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing AGENCY'S REQUEST FOR ANOTHER 

ONE-WEEK EXTENSTION TO FILE REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S 

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORAMDUM IN RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR 

DECISION 

has been sent via first class mail and facsimile addressed as follows: 

Mark A. Dombroff 

Respondent's Counsel 

McKenna Long & Alderidge 

1676 International Drive PH 

Mclean, VA 22102 

FAX: 703-336-8750 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

I hereby certify that the foregoing AGENCY'S REQUEST FOR ANOTHER 

ONE-WEEK EXTENSTION TO FILE REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S 

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORAMDUM IN RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR 

DECISION 

has been sent via first class mail addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Date:October 6, 2014 

h< 

Attorney 

•• it!.~ Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

3
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 33-75308,33-45811, 333-105087, 333-81154, 333-34077 and 333-115271)on Forms S-8 of our report on the financial statements dated December 29,2005 (October 30, 2006 as to the effects of the restatement discussed inNote 2 under the caption “Second Restatement” and the last paragraph in Note11) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the restatement of the consolidated financial statements)and of our report on internal control over financial reporting (which reportexpresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting because of material weaknesses) appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Bally Technologies, Inc.for the year ended June 30, 2005.
| DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP                                                                                                                                                               |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Las Vegas, Nevada                                                                                                                                                                            |
| December 29, 2005 (October 30, 2006 as to  the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 2 under the caption “Second  Restatement” and the last paragraph in Note 11) |

 

----