alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 507 

Designating July 8, 2016, as Collector Car Appreciation Day and recognizing 

that the collection and restoration of historic and classic cars is an 

important part of preserving the technological achievements and cultural 

heritage of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2016 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mr. TESTER) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 8, 2016, as Collector Car Appreciation 

Day and recognizing that the collection and restoration 

of historic and classic cars is an important part of preserving the technological achievements and cultural heritage of the United States. 

Whereas many people in the United States maintain classic 

automobiles as a pastime and do so with great passion 

and as a means of individual expression; 

Whereas the Senate recognizes the effect that the more than 

100-year history of the automobile has had on the economic progress of the United States and supports wholeheartedly all activities involved in the restoration and exhibition of classic automobiles; 


emcdonald on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 507 ATS 

Whereas the collection, restoration, and preservation of automobiles is an activity shared across generations and 

across all segments of society; 

Whereas thousands of local car clubs and related businesses 

have been instrumental in preserving a historic part of 

the heritage of the United States by encouraging the restoration and exhibition of such vintage works of art; 

Whereas automotive restoration provides well-paying, highskilled jobs for people in all 50 States; and 

Whereas automobiles have provided the inspiration for music, 

photography, cinema, fashion, and other artistic pursuits 

that have become part of the popular culture of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 8, 2016, as ‘‘Collector Car 

3 Appreciation Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes that the collection and restora5 tion of historic and classic cars is an important part 

6 of preserving the technological achievements and cul7 tural heritage of the United States; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to engage in events and commemorations of Col10 lector Car Appreciation Day that create opportuni11 ties for collector car owners to educate young people 

12 about the importance of preserving the cultural her13 itage of the United States, including through the 

14 collection and restoration of collector cars. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7871

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LARRY L. STEWART,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-174-N)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 29, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry L. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Harvey Lee Bryant, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Stewart, No. CR-92-174-N

(E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
DATOS

RÁPIDOS

Departamento del Trabajo de EE.UU.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA

Para información más completa:

Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional

Astilladoras

Consejos de Seguridad

Las astilladoras cortan ramas de árboles en pedazos

pequeños. Los riesgos surgen cuando los trabajadores se

acercan demasiado o hacen contacto con las astilladora. El

contacto con los componentes de una astilladora en funcionamiento (cuchillas, discos o cuchillos) puede tener como

resultado una amputación o la muerte. Los trabajadores

también pueden ser lesionados por el material que sale de

la máquina. Para reducir estos riesgos, use los controles de

ingeniería y prácticas de trabajo apropiados, incluyendo la

capacitación de los trabajadores.

Riesgos

• Trabajadores teniendo contacto o siendo halados hacia

dentro de la astilladora.

• Pérdida de audición.

• Lesiones en la cara, ojos, cabeza o manos.

Prácticas de Trabajo Seguras 

• Nunca ponga las manos adentro de una astilladora mientras esté en funcionamiento.

• No use ropa holgada alrededor de una astilladora.

• Siga siempre las recomendaciones e instrucciones de

seguridad del manufacturero.

• Use tapones para oídos, gafas de seguridad, casco de

seguridad y guantes.

• Los trabajadores deben estar adiestrados en la operación

segura de las astilladoras. Siempre supervise a los

empleados nuevos que usen astilladoras para asegurarse

que ellos trabajan de manera segura y que nunca se

ponen en peligro o ponen en peligro a otros.

• Protéjase de contactar los componentes de astilladoras

en funcionamiento poniendo guardas en los puntos de

alimentación y descarga, y evitando que se abran las

cubiertas o puertas de acceso hasta que el tambor o

disco se detenga completamente. 

• Evite que remolques desconectados de las astilladoras

rueden o se deslicen en áreas inclinadas poniéndole calzos a las ruedas del remolque.

• Mantenga una distancia segura (o sea, el largo de 2

árboles o troncos) entre trabajos con astilladoras y otros

trabajos/trabajadores.

• Cuando se esté dando servicio o mantenimiento a equipo

de astillar (o sea, desatascándolo) use el sistema de candado para asegurarse de que el equipo esté desactivado.
y

y

g

g

September 18, 2012 

Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator 

Environmental Protection Agency-Region 10 

1200 Sixth A venue, Suite 900 

Seattle, W A 98101 

RE: Washington Department of Ecology Failure to Promulgate Fish Consumption Rates 

Dear Administrator McLerran, 

Sixteen years ago the Tulalip Tribes, together with the Squaxin Island Tribe, published the results 

of our fish consumption survey. The results of this scientifically reviewed study (Toy, et al., 1996) 

indicated that our tribal members consume, despite diminished and less accessible populations of 

fish and shellfish, dramatically higher amounts of fish than is assumed under the State of 

Washington's current rate of approximately 6.5 grams/day. After years of hard work and 

collaboration with the State, and after many promises to the Tribes to establish human health 

criteria and update their default fish consumption rate, Ecology appears to have bowed to pressure 

from industry, and is further delaying this critical process. 

The revised approach from Ecology represents a reversal of previous commitments made. Ecology 

asked that tribes wait until a numeric default FCR was established in the state's sediment 

management standards for toxic cleanup. Ecology no longer intends to include a default FCR in 

the sediment management standards. Tribes have lost two years waiting for this process to 

conclude, and our confidence in Ecology's ability to adopt a protective standard has been severely 

weakened. 

Ecology has published a revised version of the technical support document fish consumption rates, 

which was previously published in September, 2011. The revised version lacks the substance of 

the earlier version, which included important public health recommendations affecting tribal 

people. Ecology has stripped the document of essential technical recommendations related to a 

default range for fish consumption rates that would protect public health. 

All parties, including the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Ecology, tribes, and 

many businesses have agreed that the existing fish consumption rate is not accurate, and is a 

fraction of actual fish consumption. The Department of Ecology has known for years that existing 
p

q

y 

sixteen years that have passed since Tulalip's fish consumption study was completed and results 

shared with EPA and Ecology, we believe it is high time for action, not more process. The State of 

Oregon has adopted 175 g/day FCR in response to tribal and other scientifically sound data, in 

order to be protective of the public health of its residents. We cannot afford to stand by any longer 

while this political football is tossed back and forth. We are asking the Environmental Protection 

Agency, as our federal trustee, to intervene and establish an interim protective and accurate FCR 

until such time that the State of Washington can provide the same. 

Sincerely, 

Terry Williams, Commissioner Fisheries and Natural Resources 

Cc: Tulalip Chairman and Board of Directors
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000059440
<NAME> VECTOR GROUP LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          33,046
<SECURITIES>                                    50,345
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     55,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,655
<PP&E>                                         215,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (49,118)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 530,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          359,893
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,199
<OTHER-SE>                                    (141,240)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   530,930
<SALES>                                        383,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               384,979
<CGS>                                         (154,142)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (365,056)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (23,570)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,762
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,314
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,592
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (230)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,362
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
# Public SVEP Log

&KFF0000CONFIDENTIAL:      FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY	&"Arial,Bold"&12NATIONAL OFFICE SVEP LOG(Updated &D)	

&P	&8&D &T

# Total Follow-ups

SVEP Follow-Up Status as of Jan. 31, 2012

Region

Number of SVEP Cases

# Followups

SVEP Follow-Up: Construction v. Non Construction as of Jan. 31, 2012

Region

Number of SVEP Cases

# Contest Status

# FY 2013
# Official Journal C 404/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 404 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 619 November 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 404

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 619 November 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2018/C 404/01 | Opinion No 2/2017 accompanying the Commission Evaluation report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Article 19) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2018/C 404/01

Opinion No 2/2017 accompanying the Commission Evaluation report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Article 19)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FROM  THE FIRST
QUARTER 2000 10-Q OF BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         927314
<NAME>                        BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                              54,403
<SECURITIES>                                        29,032
<RECEIVABLES>                                       30,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        127,650
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   408,425
<PP&E>                                             411,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     958,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              260,531
<BONDS>                                            638,937
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1
<OTHER-SE>                                          23,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       958,356
<SALES>                                            289,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   289,815
<CGS>                                              214,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      214,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                           438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    746
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           746
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 129 

Recognizing the significance of the parsonage allowance to the Nation’s 

religious and spiritual communities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2018 

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. CARTER of Texas, 

Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. BARTON, Mr. BABIN, Mr. POSEY, Mr. WILSON of 

South Carolina, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. SMUCKER, Mr. RUTHERFORD, 

Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. 

PALAZZO, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. GIANFORTE, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, 

Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. THORNBERRY, and Mr. WALBERG) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the significance of the parsonage allowance to 

the Nation’s religious and spiritual communities. 

Whereas churches, synagogues, and other religious institutions lie at the heart of communities large and small 

across the United States; 

Whereas these institutions are focal points for worship, spiritual devotion, education, neighborhood development, social services, and many other benefits to the communities 

of which they form an integral part; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 129 IH 

Whereas, for more than 200 years, tax exemptions and exclusions for religious institutions have served as essential 

tools to promote religious liberty and prevent government 

entanglement, enabling these institutions to provide such 

benefits to their communities; 

Whereas the parsonage allowance under section 107 of the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is one such exclusion; 

Whereas the parsonage allowance is available to clergy from 

a wide variety of faith traditions in nearly every community in the United States; 

Whereas Congress intended the parsonage allowance to facilitate equitable treatment for tax purposes between 

church-provided housing for clergy and housing provided 

to secular and military employees by their employers; 

Whereas the corresponding tax exclusion for secular employees is not viable in the religious context, given that many 

clergy are self-employed and the practices of religious employers vary in accordance with denominational structure 

and polity; 

Whereas the parsonage allowance has been reflected in the 

application of the Internal Revenue Code since 1939; 

Whereas throughout its history, the parsonage allowance has 

allowed religious leaders to live near their congregations 

and serve their communities; and 

Whereas the parsonage allowance is essential to treating the 

faith community fairly and avoiding excessive government 

entanglement in religion: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress recognizes the significance 

3 of the parsonage allowance to the Nation’s religious and 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 129 IH 

1 spiritual communities, and supports its continued reten2 tion in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, K. S. Adams, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ K. S. Adams, Jr.


K. S. Adams, Jr.


Chief Executive Officer


March 21, 2011











This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                            AMSOUTH BANCORPORATION
                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of all subsidiaries of AmSouth Bancorporation and the
jurisdiction in which they were organized. Each subsidiary does business under
its own name.


            Name                                  Jurisdiction Where Organized
            ----                                  ----------------------------

  ALABANC PROPERTIES, INC.                        Delaware

  AMSOUTH BANK                                    Alabama
    AmSouth Capital Corporation                   Delaware
    AmSouth Finance Corporation                   Alabama
    AmSouth Leasing Corporation                   Alabama
      AmSouth Leasing, Ltd.                       Alabama
    AmSouth Insurance Agency, Inc.                Florida
    AmSouth Investment Services, Inc.             Alabama
    AmSouth Retirement Services, Inc.             Florida
    AmSouth Riverchase, Inc.                      Alabama
    Cahaba Corporation                            Delaware
    Fifth Avenue Realty Company                   (unincorporated joint venture)
    FirstGulf Insurance Agency, Inc.              Alabama
    Five Points Capital Advisors, Inc.            Alabama
    FMLS, Inc.                                    Tennessee
    Fortune Mortgage Corporation                  Florida
    National Properties and Mining Company, Inc.  Delaware
    OakBrook Investments, LLC                     Delaware
    Rockhaven Asset Management, LLC               Delaware
    Sawgrass Asset Management LLC                 Delaware
    Service Mortgage and Insurance Agency, Inc.   Florida