# C_2015245EN.01000501.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2015 — Joachim Pöpperl v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

(Case C-187/15)

(2015/C 245/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Joachim Pöpperl

Applicant:

Defendant: Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 45 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding a national law according to which a person employed as a civil servant in a Member State loses his expectancies concerning a retirement pension (civil servant benefits) arising from employment as a civil servant because, in order to take up employment in another Member State, that person was released from the civil service at his own wish, when at the same time national law provides that that person is insured retrospectively in the statutory pension scheme on the basis of the gross salary received as a civil servant, although the resulting pension rights are less than the lost retirement pension expectancies? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 45 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding a national law according to which a person employed as a civil servant in a Member State loses his expectancies concerning a retirement pension (civil servant benefits) arising from employment as a civil servant because, in order to take up employment in another Member State, that person was released from the civil service at his own wish, when at the same time national law provides that that person is insured retrospectively in the statutory pension scheme on the basis of the gross salary received as a civil servant, although the resulting pension rights are less than the lost retirement pension expectancies?

| 2. | If the reply to the first question is in the affirmative for all or some civil servants, is Article 45 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that, in the absence of other national provisions, the earlier appointing body of the civil servant in question has to pay the civil servant either the amount of retirement pension on the basis of the period of pensionable service in the earlier civil service post, reduced by the amount of pension rights arising from the retrospective insurance, or to compensate him financially in some other way for the loss of the retirement pension, although under national law only the civil servant benefits provided for by that law may be granted? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the reply to the first question is in the affirmative for all or some civil servants, is Article 45 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that, in the absence of other national provisions, the earlier appointing body of the civil servant in question has to pay the civil servant either the amount of retirement pension on the basis of the period of pensionable service in the earlier civil service post, reduced by the amount of pension rights arising from the retrospective insurance, or to compensate him financially in some other way for the loss of the retirement pension, although under national law only the civil servant benefits provided for by that law may be granted?

---