alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>              OCT-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              620170
<SECURITIES>                                          4680
<RECEIVABLES>                                        12000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    643650
<PP&E>                                              269494
<DEPRECIATION>                                       38682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1076702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               210195
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             20742
<OTHER-SE>                                          821441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1076702
<SALES>                                              23167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     23167
<CGS>                                                15846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      1549099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (178)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (4468)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1497578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1497578)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1497578)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.07)
        


</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 21 June 2005         

granting Italy the derogation provided for in Article 3(2) of Council Directive 92/102/EEC on the identification and registration of animals

(notified under document number C(2005) 1826)

(Only the Italian text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2005/458/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/102/EEC of 27 November 1992 on the identification and registration of animals (1), and in particular Article 3(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Italy is authorised to apply the derogation provided for in Article 3(2) of Directive 92/102/EEC as regards holdings with no more than one pig.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.

Done at Brussels, 21 June 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 32. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 (OJ L 5, 9.1.2004, p. 8).

----
## NUMBER 13 -21-00467-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

RAYVEN RUIZ, Appellant,

v. THE LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD WEAVER, PLLC D/B/A THE WEAVER LAW FIRM , Appellee.
On appeal from the 36 th District Court of Bee County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva On December 27, 2021, a ppellant Rayven Ruiz filed a notice of appeal from a n

“ Order for Disbursement of Settlement Proceeds ” in trial court cause number B

- 13

- 1236

- CV -A in the 36 th District Court of Bee County, Texas. On March 10, 2022, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the reporter ’ s record in the above cause was originally2 due on February 22, 2022 , and t he court reporter, Sarah Riemenschneider, ha d notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements to pay for the reporter ’ s record. The Clerk advised appellant that the Court w ould consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter ’ s record for a decision unless this defect wa s cured within
t en days

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(c) . Appellant did not respond to the C lerk’s notice or otherwise file the reporter ’ s record. After an extension of time, the clerk ’ s record for the appeal was filed on March 22, 2022. On March 28, 2022, the C lerk advised appellant that it would consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter ’ s record for a decision, and the C lerk expected appellant ’ s brief to be filed by April 21, 2022. Appellant did not therea fter file a brief. On April 27, 2022, the Clerk notified appellant that her b rief had not been timely filed

. The Clerk advised appellant that the appeal would be dismissed f or want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant reasonably explain ed the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant ’ s failure to timely file a brief

. See id. R. 38.8(a)

. Appellant did not respond to the Clerk ’ s notice or file a brief in this matter. Appellate courts possess the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when an appellant in a civil case fails to timely file the appellant ’ s brief and gives no reasonable explanation for the failure. See id . R. 38.8(a)(1) ; id. R. 42.3(b) ; Am. Bail Bonds

v. City of El Paso , 225 S.W.3d 612 , 612 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2006, no pet.) ; Newman v. Clark , 113 S.W.3d 622, 623 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2003, no pet.) (per curiam). Similarly, courts may dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution generally or because the appellant3 has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the appellate court clerk requiring a response or other action w ithin a specified time. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3 (b), (c). The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s failure to file a brief, is o f the opinion that this appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

. See id. R. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c). C LARISSA SILVA Justice Delivered and filed on the 26th day of May , 202 2

.
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for February 2012


1.
Cases Pending Beginning of Month 
39




2.
Cases Added to Docket 



0

3.
Cases Subtracted From Docket

Shaw Areva Mox Services, LLC
No. 09-1284
Decision on 2/6/12

Nuprecon, LP d/b/a Nuprecon Acquisition, LP
No. 08-1037
Decision on 2/7/12

Associated Underwater Services
No. 07-1851
Decision on 2/28/12

Thomas Industrial Coatings, Inc.
No. 06-1542
Decision on 2/28/12

-4



4.
Total Cases Pending End of Month
35
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1796

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Vincent B. Swain, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 12, 2000 Filed: September 19, 2000

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Vincent B. Swain pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. The district court applied a twolevel enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1) (1998) for possession of a firearm and sentenced Swain to 156 months imprisonment.
Swain appeals the application of the § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement, contending the Government

did not establish by a preponderance of the evidence that Swain possessed the firearm found during a search of his girlfriend's apartment. We disagree. "The-2-

district court must impose the [§ 2D1.1(b)(1)] enhancement unless it finds that it is 'clearly improbable that the weapon had a nexus to criminal activity.'" UnitedStates v. Fairchild , 189 F.3d 769, 779 (8th Cir. 1999) (quoted case omitted); accord U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 cmt. n.3. "In a conspiracy case, a sufficient nexus is established if 'the weapon was found in the same location where drugs or drug paraphernalia were stored, or where part of the conspiracy took place.'" UnitedStates v. Tauil-Hernandez , 88 F.3d 576, 580 (8th Cir. 1996) (quoted case omitted). Here, the district court heard evidence that Swain's girlfriend was involved in the conspiracy with Swain to distribute cocaine, t hat Swain periodically stayed at his girlfriend's home, that Swain knew the gun was in his girlfriend's home, that Swain knew the girlfriend's home was a transfer point for the drugs involved in the conspiracy, and that the gun was found in close proximity to drugs and drug paraphernalia. Thus, a sufficient nexus between the gun and the drug conspiracy to which Swain pleaded guilty was established, and the district court did not commit clear error in applying the § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement. See id. (§ 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement

appropriate because defendant knew coconspirators possessed gun in furtherance of conspiracy, even though defendant testified she was afraid of gun and never used it); Fairchild , 189 F.3d at 779 (weapons owned by defendant and found in coconspirator's home were sufficient evidence to justify § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement to defendant's sentence); UnitedStates v. Turpin , 920 F.2d 1377, 1386 (8th Cir. 1990) ("single gun may justify an enhancement of the sentences of both [coconspirators], since possession of a gun by either would suffice to justify an upward adjustment of the other's offense level if it was reasonably foreseeable that one of them would possess a gun in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity").
We have reviewed Swain's remaining arguments and conclude they are likewise without merit. We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-3-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 432 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 90334)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-285, K2025-283.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26560 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

32.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
        of VOXEL pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VOXEL (the "Company")
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael Anthony,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of VOXEL, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 17, 2008


                                    /s/ Michael Anthony
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Michael Anthony
                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                    /s/ Michael Anthony
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Michael Anthony
                                    Chief Financial Officer
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4284 — Axa/Winterthur)

(2006/C 177/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1.

----
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

Commission Monthly Case Activity for October 2011 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 35 

 

2. Cases Added to Docket 

ConocoPhillips Bayway Refinery 

No. 07-1045 

Mandate from Third Circuit received on 10/12/11 

Chenal Valley Construction, Inc. 

No. 11-1351 

Direction for Review on 10/20/11 

Jacobs Field Services North America 

No. 10-2659 

Direction for Review on 10/27/11 

3 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket 

ConocoPhillips Bayway Refinery 

No. 07-1045 

Decision on 10/25/11 

-1 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 37
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

          - [OCC Charter Number 700165]

                    Notice is hereby given that on November 8, 2024, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) approved the application of Mutual Savings and Loan Association Metairie, Louisiana, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available on the OCC website at the FOIA Reading Room (                    *https://foia-pal.occ.gov/​palMain.aspx*) under Mutual to Stock Conversion Applications. If you have any questions, please contact Licensing Activities at (202) 649-6260.                

(Authority: 12 CFR 192.205).

Dated: November 8, 2024.

By the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

Stephen A. Lybarger,

Deputy Comptroller for Licensing.

[FR Doc. 2024-26680 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-33-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2348]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   THE 60TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

                                 ______
                                 

                       HON. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                       Tuesday, December 9, 2008

  Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Madam Speaker, I rise to 
commemorate the anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human 
Rights. Sixty years since its inception, the Declaration of Human 
Rights continues to be a foundation for the protection of rights and a 
statement to the world that human rights abuse is an abomination of the 
human race.
  On December 10, 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations 
adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The 
declaration was established from the horrific religious and racial 
bigotry of World War II. The declaration represented the first global 
expression of rights to which all human beings are inherently entitled. 
This declaration expresses to the world that human rights are not just 
a principle for the few, the wealthy, or for those who live in 
economically developed nations--human rights are universal and for all 
humankind.
  Today, we still live in a world where people murder their neighbors 
over religion, the color of their skin, and national ideologies. This 
is unacceptable. It is my hope that we as a world of nations can settle 
our differences through dialogue and treat our fellow man with dignity 
and respect.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                        ALABAMA NATIONAL BANCORPORATION
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED)
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997
                                                             ------------------------------------
                                                                 Primary        Fully Diluted
                                                                 ------             ------
<S>                                                          <C>                <C>   
Net income ..............................................        $8,193             $8,193
                                                                 ======             ======


Average shares outstanding ..............................         6,531              6,531
Effect of stock options .................................           188                202
Effect of Performance Share and
  Deferred Compensation Plans ...........................            17                 20
                                                                 ------             ------

Applicable shares outstanding ...........................         6,736              6,753
                                                                 ======             ======

Earnings per share ......................................        $ 1.22             $.1.21
                                                                 ======             ======

<CAPTION>
                                                             Three Months Ended September 30, 1997
                                                             -------------------------------------
                                                                 Primary        Fully Diluted
                                                                 ------             ------
<S>                                                          <C>                <C>   
Net income ..............................................        $2,844             $2,844
                                                                 ======             ======


Average shares outstanding ..............................         6,552              6,552
Effect of stock options .................................           200                202
Effect of Performance Share and
  Deferred Compensation Plans ...........................            22                 22
                                                                 ------             ------

Applicable shares outstanding ...........................         6,774              6,776
                                                                 ======             ======

Earnings per share ......................................        $ 0.42             $ 0.42
                                                                 ======             ======
</TABLE>







                                       24
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raúl Alarcón, Jr., Chairman of the Board of
Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Raúl Alarcón, Jr.Name:
    
    Raúl Alarcón, Jr.Title:
    
    Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    May 10, 2005
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for September 2015

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 34

2. Cases Added to Docket 

Richard Kaposy d/b/a Treeman Landscaping

No. 10-2333

Mandate from Third Circuit received on September 10, 2015

Tom Reed Contracting

No. 14-1659

Direction for Review on September 18, 2015

2

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket

Richard Kaposy d/b/a Treeman Landscaping

No. 10-2333

Remand Order on September 24, 2015

Lake Erie Construction Co.

No. 11-0146

Decision and Remand on September 24, 2015

Tom Reed Contracting

No. 14-1659

Remand Order on September 25, 2015

-3

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 33