alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
consent.htm




Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-149449) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 7, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 7, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities.







                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


 


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


October 27, 2010
Exhibit  3.2


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                            ------------------------
                                       TO
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               ITIS HOLDINGS INC.

                            (Pursuant to NRS 78.380)

     FIRST:  The  undersigned  is  the  sole incorporation or ITIS Holdings Inc.
     -----

     SECOND:  The  original Articles of Incorporation of ITIS Holdings Inc. were
     ------
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on August 15, 2002.

     THIRD:  As  of  the  date  hereof,  no stock of ITIS Holdings Inc. has been
     -----
issued.

     FOURTH:  The  Articles  of  Incorporation  of  ITIS Holdings Inc. is hereby
     ------
amended  by  adding  the  following  provision  thereto:

     TWELFTH:  Upon written demand of the Corporation, each record holder of any
     -------
     shares of the capital stock of any class or series of the Corporation shall
     provide  the  Corporation with the name and address of each person for whom
     such  person  holds  such shares as the beneficial owner, the number, class
     and  series  of  the  shares  so  held,  and manner of holding such shares.
     Likewise, upon written demand of the Corporation, each beneficial holder of
     any  shares  of the capital stock of any class or series of the Corporation
     shall  provide  the Corporation with the name and address of any person who
     has  an  interest in such shares, directly or indirectly, and the nature of
     such  interest. As used herein, the terms "beneficial owner" shall mean and
     include any person who has the sole or joint right to dispose of the shares
     or  direct  the  disposal of shares, the sole or joint economic interest in
     the  shares, or the sole or joint right to receive or direct the receipt of
     dividends  or  other  distributions  relating  to  the  shares.


     IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereby execute these Articles of Incorporation on
August  26,  2002.




                                        ----------------------
                                        Lawrence E. Wilson


<PAGE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anza Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent Rinehart, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  
 Dated: September 11, 2003
/s/ Vincent RinehartBy: Vincent RinehartIts: President 
  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Anza Capital, Inc. and will be retained by Anza Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Yates, Appellant, vs. Helstern, Sheriff, imp., Respondent.

*May 7*—

June *4, 1940.*

*89For the appellant there was a brief by *Tom L. Yates*of Amery in *pro. per.*and *Frederick F. Hillyer*of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Yates.*

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *Nelton & McGinnis*of Balsam Lake.

*90Fairchild, J.

The cause of action appearing from the pleadings is to recover for the county money now in the hands of the defendant Helstern. The question to1 be decided on this appeal is whether an action can be maintained at the behest of a taxpayer without authorization by the county board of supervisors for and on behalf of the county, against one who claims tO' have the right to certain moneys in his possession where the county board is so constituted that demand on it for action would be futile.

This action was begun June 14, 1939. There were no formal proceedings on any resolution referring directly to the commencement of an action by the county tO' recover this money. A written resolution was not introduced into’ the board until August 22, 1939. The proceedings of the county board prior to June 14th are disclosed by the pleadings and the evidence. The court below decided the case upon the point that the taxpayer’s action was prematurely brought.

It is shown that the plaintiff is a member of the county board of supervisors of Polk county, and that he had investigated the question of the ownership of the moneys, and found that an amount of at least $228.50' belonging to the county was in the possession of the defendant. Plis report to the board in May was at a regular meeting. Immediately following this report he urged that action be taken to collect from the defendant the amount in question. The response to this request was the adoption by the board of a motion providing: “That the sheriff’s bills already allowed and paid be accepted by the board.” This was a sufficient declaration of the board’s attitude on the matter to show it to be in opposition to bringing any proceeding to recover the county’s property, and warranted the taxpayer, under these circumstances, in beginning this action. It then became apparent that the board of supervisors was hostile to any attempt to interfere with the defendant’s retention of the money. This *91was a refusal to bring an action, and gave plaintiff his right to sue. The claim of the plaintiff, if well founded, entitles the county to the benefit of that money. *Northern Trust Co. v.*Snyder, 113 Wis. 516, 89 N. W. 460; *Schulz v. Kissling,*228 Wis. 282, 280 N. W. 388; *Reetz v. Kitch,*230 Wis. 1, 283 N. W. 348.

Because the trial court was of the opinion that something more definite or formal disclosing the attitude of the board be done before the action could be begun by plaintiff, it ruled that' the complaint was prematurely made and declined to decide the case upon the merits. This was error, and to set matters right the case must go back for findings of fact and conclusions of law and the entering of a proper judgment.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TERRICK M. CROSBY, )

a/k/a TERRICK MAURICE CROSBY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-875

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; Lauren L. Brodie, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Keith W. Upson, Special Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Andrew Tetreault, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 205/2006

of 6 February 2006         

amending Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, as regards toltrazuril, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 of 26 June 1990 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin (1), and in particular Articles 2 and 3 thereof,

Having regard to the opinions of the European Medicines Agency formulated by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annexes I and II to Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 8 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 February 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 6/2006 (OJ L 3, 6.1.2006, p. 3).

(2)OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/28/EC (OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 58).

----

ANNEX

A.   The following substance is inserted in Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90:

2.   Antiparasitic agents

2.4.   Agents acting against protozoa

2.4.1.   Triazinetrione derivatives

B.   The following substances are inserted in Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90:

2.   Organic compounds

3.   Substances generally recognised as safe

----

(1)  Not for use in animals from which milk is produced for human consumption.

(2)  For porcine species this MRL relates to “skin and fat in natural proportions”.

(3)  Not for use in animals from which eggs are produced for human consumption.’         

----
Mount Knowledge Holdings, Inc.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.1

LETTER OF INTENT 

October 26, 2010 

Mr. Erwin Sniedzins 
Mount Knowledge USA, Inc. 
Chairman
and Director 
39555 Orchard Hill Place 
Suite 600 
Novi, Michigan 48375



Re: Extension of Letter of Intent dated September 26, 2010 

Dear Mr. Sniedzins: 

This letter confirms our mutual intentions to further extend
the effective period of the Letter of Intent executed on April 26, 2010 by and
between MOUNT KNOWLEDGE HOLDINGS, INC., a fully reporting public Nevada
corporation (“Purchaser and/or MKHD”) and MOUNT KNOWLEDGE USA, INC. (“MTKUSA”),
a privately-held Nevada corporations and its Shareholders (“Shareholders”),
hereinafter MTKUSA and the Shareholders shall be collectively referred to as
(the “Sellers”) with respect to the potential transaction described therein.

All of the terms and conditions of the proposed transaction
shall be set forth in a definitive agreement (the “Stock Purchase and Share
Exchange Agreement”) to be executed on or before December 31, 2010 (the
“Extended Period”), with a subsequent date of closing (the “Closing Date”), to
be mutually agreed to by Sellers and Purchaser. 

The modification and extension is required for Mount Knowledge
USA, Inc. to complete the ongoing Regulation D Rule 506 Private Placement to
raise a maximum of $1,500,000 dollars in equity capital in MTKUSA. MTKUSA has
represented to MKHD as of the date of this Letter of Intent extension that it
has already raised a total of approximately $1,450,000 dollars to date. Both
parties agree that MTKUSA shall be allowed to continue to raise capital from its
offering until the Closing Date at which time the shareholders of record of
MTKUSA at such date would be acknowledged and included in the executed Stock
Purchase and Share Exchange Agreement. 

This document, in and of itself, does not represent an
enforceable legal contract. This extension, when executed by both parties, shall
not supersede any of the terms and conditions set forth in the previously
executed Letter of Intent on or about April 26, 2010. All terms and conditions
of the original Letter of Intent dated on April 26, 2010 shall remain in full
effect. 

1




If the foregoing terms and conditions are acceptable to Mount
Knowledge USA, Inc, please so indicate by initialing each page and signing the
enclosed copy of this Letter of Intent and returning it to the attention of the
undersigned.

Sincerely, 

	MOUNT KNOWLEDGE HOLDINGS, INC. 
	  	 	 
	  	 	 
	  	 	 
	                   	/s/ Daniel A.
      Carr  	 
	By: 	 	 
	                   	Daniel A. Carr,  	 
	                   	President and
      CEO  	 
	  	 	 
	  	 	 
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED 
	  	 	 
	  	 	 
	  	 	 
	MOUNT KNOWLEDGE USA, INC. 
	  	 	 
	  	 	 
	  	 	 
	                   	/s/ Erwin
      Sniedzins  	 
	By: 	 	 
	                   	Erwin Sniedzins  	 
	                   	Chairman and
      Director  	 
	  	 	 
	  	 	 
	Date: October 26, 2010 


2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S150]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              APPOINTMENT

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Pursuant to the order of the Senate of 
December 11, 2008, authorizing appointments to be made during the 
recess or adjournment of the Senate, the Chair lays before the Senate 
an appointment made on December 18, 2008:
  The Chair, on behalf of the Republican Leader, pursuant to provisions 
of Public Law 110-343, appoints the following individual as a member of 
the Congressional Oversight Panel: the Honorable John Sununu, of New 
Hampshire vice the Honorable Judd Gregg, of New Hampshire.

                          ____________________
```
# Official Journal C 160A/27 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 160A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5727 May 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 160A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5727 May 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2014/C 160A/01 | Cancellation notice | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2014/C 160A/01

Cancellation notice

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 160A/02 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 2 |

2014/C 160A/02

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on December 31, 2019 

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 14-1688

Science Applications 

International Corp., 

d/b/a SAIC

06/23/16 DFR 10/31/16 Closed

2 15-1121 Clean Fuels of 

Indiana, Inc. 06/30/16 DFR 11/09/16 Closed

3 14-1268 Dover High 

Performance Plastics 07/19/16 DFR 11/01/16 Closed

4 15-1347 Gate Precast Co. 11/10/16 DFR 12/05/16 Closed

 5 16-1533

Cooper/T. Smith 

Corporation, d/b/a 

Blakeley Boatworks, 

Inc.

04/27/17 DFR 04/27/17 Closed

 6 16-0803

The Lane 

Construction 

Corporation

05/23/17 DFR 09/14/17 Closed

 7 16-1167 Aerospace Testing 

Alliance 08/22/17 DFR 11/20/17 Closed

 8 15-1069 Healy Tibbitts 

Builders, Inc. 10/27/17 DFR 11/13/17 Closed

 9 16-0940 Angel Brothers 

Enterprises, Ltd. 11/17/17 DFR 12/15/17 Closed

10 17-0190 Shelly & Sands, Inc. 05/02/18 DFR 05/10/18 Closed

11 15-1574

MasTec North 

America dba MasTec 

Advanced 

Technologies, Inc.

06/20/18 DFR 07/10/18 Closed

12 17-0949 Walmart, Inc. 07/12/18 DFR 08/09/18 Closed

13 16-1587 TNT Crane & Rigging, 

Inc. 10/16/18 DFR 10/30/18 Closed

14 17-1214 Mansfield Industrial, 

Inc. 11/23/18 DFR 01/03/19 Closed

15 17-0483 Ceco Concrete 

Construction, LLC 11/28/18 DFR 12/19/18 Closed

16 16-1628 Schaad Detective 

Agency, Inc. 12/18/18 DFR 01/07/19 Closed

17 17-1174 Wayne Farms, LLC 03/01/19 DFR 03/21/19 Closed

18 17-2144 Tampa Electric Co. 04/09/19 DFR 04/23/19 Closed

19 19-0142

Steven S. Moalemi, 

M.D., P.C., d/b/a 

Empire Physical 

Medicine and Pain 

Management

09/26/19 DFR

20 18-0034

Armstrong Utilities, 

Inc. d/b/a Armstrong 

Cable Services

10/15/19 DFR 10/24/19 Open
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on December 31, 2019 

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

21 17-0138 Home Rubber 

Company, LP 10/22/19 DFR 11/04/19 Open

22 18-0970 FreightCar America, 

Inc. 10/28/19 DFR 11/04/19 Open

23 18-0758 RoadSafe Traffic 

Systems, Inc. 10/30/19 DFR 11/01/19 Open

24 09-0901 Seward Ship’s 

Drydock, Inc. 11/04/19 REM

25 17-0992 Coleman Hammons 

Constr. Co. Inc. 12/30/19 REM

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
1 Subject: FW: Air pollution and birth weight in TX paper in AWMA (2012) Attachments: Tables 5_Adj. Health Service Regions.docx

From: Laura Geer [ mailto:Laura.Geer@downstate.edu ] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 5:48 PM To: Luben, Tom Subject: Re: Air pollution and birth weight in TX paper in AWMA (2012)

Hi Tom,

Please see attached the additional NO2 data you have requested. Let me know if you have any questions.

Best, Laura

-----"Luben, Tom" < Luben.Tom@epa.gov > wrote: ----- To: " laura.geer@downstate.edu " < laura.geer@downstate.edu > From: "Luben, Tom" < Luben.Tom@epa.gov > Date: 04/19/2013 08:04AM Subject: Air pollution and birth we ight in TX paper in AWMA (2012)



### Hi Dr. Geer,

I am working on the current review of the NOx National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and am reviewing your paper, “Ambient air pollution and term birth weight in Te xas from 1998 to 2004”. One of the key considerations we look for in our review of the literature are populations that coul d be potentially at-risk due to exposure. I noticed that in Table 5 of your pape r you present stratified results based on race/ethnicity for some, but not all, pollutants. I wa s wondering if you had results of such analyses for NO2 and if you would be willing to share them with me? Even if there is no evidence of an association between NO2 and birthweight, nor evidence of effect measure modi fication by race/ethnicity, this informa tion is valuable and will help to inform our evaluation of NO2 for this NAAQS review.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, Tom

Tom Luben, PhD National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency RTP, NC 27711 (919) 541-5762Table 5. Change in birth weight per IQR increase in pollutant for gestational period, by race (95% confidence interval). Difference in birth weight (g) per IQR of pollutant
Pollutant Non

- Hispanic b lack mother Hispanic mother Non

- Hispanic w hite mother
NO 2 * 5.24 (

- 0.37 to 10.86 ) 2.22 (

- 1.79 to 6.23 )

- 1.77 (

- 6.18 to 2.62 )

CO * 9.52 (5.53 to 13.52 )

- 0.3 (

- 2.46 to 1.86 ) 4.32 (1.72 to 6.92 )

O 3 - 3.89 (

- 6.6 to

- 1.17 )

- 1.87 (

- 3.95 to 0.21 )

- 2.97 (

- 5.15 to

- 0.78 )

SO 2 * - 1.81 (

- 7.54 to 3.93 )

- 6.39 (

- 9.62 to

- 3.16 ) 0.34 (

- 4.22 to 4.9 )

PM 2.5 * 1.93 (

- 3.95 to 7.82 ) 3.35 (1.37 to 5.33 )

- 3.44 (

- 7.01 to 0.12 )

PM 10 * 9.62 (6.28 to 12.96 ) 1.59 (0.35 to 2.83 )

- 2.3 (

- 4.19 to

- 0.41 )
*p<0.05 for comparison of results from infants with non

- Hispanic black mothers to infants of non

- Hispanic white and H ispanic mothers. Adjusted for Texas Health Service Region s 1

- 11 (excluding Region 2 due to lack of data)

.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



March 10, 2005



| |  |                                            
| |  | -------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/    PAUL J.
EVANSON                     
| |  | Paul J. Evanson Principal Executive Officer
1 State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD

CALIFORNIA EXHAUST AND EVAPORATIVE EMISSION STANDAR DS AND TEST

PROCEDURES FOR NEW 2010 AND LATER OFF-ROAD LARGE SP ARK-IGNITION

ENGINES

(2010 and Later Test Procedure 1048)

Adopted: March 2, 2007 Amended: [insert date of amendment]

NOTE: This document is printed in a style to indica te changes from the existing

provisions. All existing language is indicated by plain type. All additions to language are indicated by underlined text. All deletions to language are indicated by strikeout . Only those sections containing the suggested modifications from the existing language are includ ed. All other portions remain unchanged and are indicated by the symbol “* * * * *” for

reference.2

PART 1048 – CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM NEW, LARGE NO NROAD SPARKIGNITION ENGINES

Subpart A—Overview and Applicability

* * * * *

§1048.101 What exhaust emission standards must my engines meet?

* * * * *

(a) (2) Exhaust Emission Standards. Exhaust emissions from off-road large sparkignition engines manufactured for sale, sold, or of fered for sale in California, or that are introduced, delivered or imported into California f or introduction into commerce, must

not exceed:

Exhaust Emission Standards (grams per brake horsepower-hour) [grams per kilowatt-hour] (1)

Model Year Engine Displacement Durability

Period HC + NO

x Carbon

Monoxide

2010 and subsequent ≤ 1.0 liter 1,000 hours or 2 years 9.0

[12.0] 410

[549]

2011 and subsequent ≤ 825 cc 1,000 hours or 2 years 6.0

[8.0] 410

[549]

2011 - 2014 > 825 cc - ≤ 1.0 liter 1,000 hours or 2 years 4.8

[6.5] 280

[375]

2015 and subsequent > 825 cc - ≤ 1.0 liter 1,000 hours or 2 years 0.6

[0.8] 15.4

[20.6]

2010 and subsequent (2) > 1.0 liter 5000 hours or 7 years 0.6

[0.8] 15.4

[20.6]

Note: (1) Pollutant emissions reported to ARB by ma nufacturers must be in grams per kilowatthour. (2) Small volume manufacturers are required to com ply with these emission standards in

2013.

For severe-duty engines, the HC+NOx standard is 2.7 g/kW-hr and the CO standard is 130.0 g/kW-hr. The following engines are not subje ct to the transient standards in this paragraph (a): A. High-load engines. B. Engines with maximum engine power above 560 kW. C. Engines with maximum test speed above 3400 rpm.

D. Constant-speed engines and severe-duty engines.