alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert B. Barnhill, Jr., Chief ExecutiveOfficer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated (the “Company”), certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

# 1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarter ended September 27, 2009 (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

#  

# 2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 11,  2009 | /s/ Robert B.  Barnhill, Jr. |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                          | Robert B. Barnhill, Jr.      |

##  

##  

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for August 2014

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 38

2. Cases Added to Docket 

Evergreen Construction Co. 

No. 12-2385

Direction for Review on 08/11/14

1

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket

Torre Mackle Group, LLC

No. 12-0318

Final Order on 08/20/14

-1

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 38
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission 

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on September 30, 2011 

DOCKET 

NUMBER 

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME 

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING 

NOTICE 

DATE 

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

1 07-0645 Erickson Air-Crane, 

Incorporated 03/18/08 DFR 04/11/08 Closed 

2 07-1796 Pullman Power, LLC and its 

successors 

09/24/08 DFR 

3 07-1578 Elliot Construction Corp. 07/24/09 DFR 08/05/09 Closed 

4 06-1542 Thomas Industrial Coatings, 

Inc. 09/23/09 DFR 10/07/09 Closed 

5 08-0088 

Acme Energy Services d/b/a 

Big Dog Drilling, and its 

successors 

12/04/09 DFR 01/26/10 Closed 

6 05-0055 L&L Painting Company, Inc. 12/22/09 DFR 02/02/10 Closed 

7 08-1292 Wal-Mart Distribution Center 

#6016 01/12/10 DFR 01/25/10 Closed 

8 07-1851 Associated Underwater 

Services 01/13/10 DFR 01/29/10 Closed 

9 08-1225 K.E.R. Enterprises, Inc. dba 

Armadillo Underground 01/13/10 DFR 01/25/10 Closed 

10 09-1284 Shaw Areva Mox Services, LLC 01/20/10 DFR 01/29/10 Closed 

11 08-1037 Nuprecon, LP 02/13/10 DFR 03/29/10 Closed 

12 08-0866 Southern Pan Services Co. 04/15/10 DFR 05/05/10 Closed 

13 09-0240 Deep South Crane and Rigging 

Co. 04/22/10 DFR 05/06/10 Closed 

14 08-1547 United States Postal Service 04/29/10 DFR 05/21/10 Closed 

15 08-1318 LJC Dismantling Corp. 05/04/10 DFR 05/24/10 Closed 

16 09-0004 Stark Excavating, Inc. 06/15/10 DFR 06/28/10 Closed 

17 09-0005 Stark Excavating, Inc. 06/15/10 DFR 06/28/10 Closed 

18 07-0437 Cleveland Wrecking Company 07/28/10 DFR 09/22/10 Closed 

19 09-1072 Boh Brothers Construction 

Company, LLC 08/25/10 DFR 09/01/10 Closed 

20 09-1048 Brand Energy Solutions LLC 09/02/10 DFR 09/07/10 Closed 

21 08-1656 Central Florida Equipment 

Rentals, Inc. 09/08/10 DFR 10/22/10 Closed 

22 10-1021 C.P. Buckner Steel Erection, 

Inc. 09/28/10 DFR 10/20/10 Closed 

23 08-0316 Cranesville Block Company / 

Clark Division 10/15/10 DFR 12/28/10 Closed 

24 08-0317 Cranesville Block Company / 

Clark Division 10/15/10 DFR 12/28/10 Closed 

25 09-1123 Shaw Global Energy Services, 

Inc. 12/10/10 DFR 12/28/10 Closed 

Page 1 of 2 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission 

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on September 30, 2011 

DOCKET 

NUMBER 

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME 

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING 

NOTICE 

DATE 

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

26 10-0265 Jesco, Inc. 12/30/10 DFR 02/02/11 Closed 

27 10-0264 Nova Group/Tutor-Saliba, a 

Joint Venture 12/30/10 DFR 02/08/11 Closed 

28 10-0359 American Engineering & 

Development Corporation 02/04/11 DFR 03/03/11 Closed 

29 09-1278 Otis Elevator Company 02/14/11 DFR 03/01/11 Closed 

30 10-0551 Ryder Transportation Services 04/05/11 DFR 05/03/11 Closed 

31 09-1013 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 04/06/11 DFR 04/19/11 Open 

32 09-1451 All Erection & Crane Rental 

Corp. 04/13/11 DFR 04/27/11 Closed 

33 10-0610 E.R. Zeiler Excavating, Inc. 05/16/11 DFR 05/27/11 Open 

34 08-1386 Delek Refining, Ltd. 06/08/11 DFR 06/14/11 Open 

35 10-0108 Barnhart, Inc. 07/14/11 DFR 08/11/11 Open 

* DFR – Direction for Review 

REM – Appellate Remand 

INT REV - Interlocutory Review 

Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26559]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 15, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
431 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-272, K2025-270.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26559 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         294,746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  175,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    122,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               677,335
<PP&E>                                      14,544,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,603,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,287,897
<BONDS>                                     10,733,516
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,751
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,578,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,603,692
<SALES>                                      1,800,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,800,823
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,400,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             291,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,304
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________

No. 95-30261

Conference Calendar

_________________

JUDE B. SAUCIER,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOEY ALCEDE, Warden,

Calcasieu Correctional Center,

 Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-30261

- - - - - - - - - -

June 28, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jude B. Saucier requests a certificate of probable cause

(CPC) and maintains that he has exhausted state remedies

regarding his challenge to the constitutionality of Louisiana's

"good-time" statute, La. Rev. Stat. Ann. 15:571.5 (West 1994). 

Saucier's habeas petition is a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition,

not a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Dickerson v. Louisiana, 816

F.2d 220, 224 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 956 (1987). He

is attacking a restraint on his liberty, a parole-hold detainer,

caused, not by documents issued by a state court, but by
No. 95-30261

-2-

Louisiana prison officials. See Birdwell v. Skeen, 983 F.2d

1332, 1335 n.5 (5th Cir. 1993) (documents such as detainers

issued by a criminal justice agency are not documents issued by a

state court). Thus, a CPC is unnecessary for the appeal because

"the detention complained of [does not] arise[] out of process

issued by a State court." Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); cf. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253. Saucier's motion for a CPC is DENIED as unnecessary. 

There is no statutory requirement that a petitioner seeking

federal habeas relief under § 2241 exhaust state habeas remedies. 

See § 2241(c)(3). However, there is a "judicially crafted"

exhaustion requirement based on "federalism grounds in order to

protect the state courts' opportunity to confront and resolve any

constitutional issues arising within their jurisdictions as well

as to limit federal interference in the state adjudicatory

process." Dickerson, 816 F.2d at 225.

The exhaustion doctrine requires a habeas petitioner to

present his claims to the state's highest court in the procedural

posture in which the claims ordinarily will be considered on

their merits. Castille v. Peoples, 489 U.S. 346, 351 (1989);

Dupuy v. Butler, 837 F.2d 699, 702 (5th Cir. 1982). Saucier

admits that he has not done this. The district court's

dismissal, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state

remedies was proper.

CPC DENIED as unnecessary; JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, I, Thomas E.
Legro, Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Indiantown
Cogeneration, L.P., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Indiantown
Cogeneration, L.P.

|                |  |                               
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------
|August 13, 2003 |  | /s/ THOMAS E. LEGRO           
|                |  |                               
|                |  | Thomas E. Legro               
|                |  | Vice President, Controller and
|                |  | Chief Accounting Officer      
|                |  | Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. and will be retained by Indiantown
Cogeneration, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00572-CR

JESUS ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2012-DCR-1221

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 22, 2015
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant, 

v. OSHRC Docket No. 20-0653 

EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND 

STORAGE, INC., 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE 

The parties are requested to brief the following issues with respect to Items 1a and 1b: 

(1) Whether the judge erred in concluding that the Secretary established recognition of the 

alleged hazards. 

(2) Whether the judge erred in concluding that the Secretary established Respondent’s 

knowledge of the alleged hazardous conditions. 

The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider either the merits 

or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission 

in accordance with Commission Rule 93. The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed 

in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service. 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: November 5, 2021 /s/ 

John X. Cerveny 

Executive Secretary 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, 

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. 

Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
#### State v. Palaia, John Henry

(14049).

Affirmed. *State v. Cloutier,*286 Or 579, 596 P2d 1278 (1979); *State v. Applegate,*39 Or App 17, 591 P2d 371, *rev den*287 Or 301 (1979). (603 P2d 780, *rev den*288 Or 335 (1980))
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2225]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          EARMARK DECLARATION

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. VITO FOSSELLA

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, October 3, 2008

  Mr. FOSSELLA. Madam Speaker, I submit the following:
  Bill Number: H.R. 2638.
  Account: Military Construction, Army Reserve National Guard.
  Legal Name of Requesting Entity: New York National Guard.
  Address of Requesting Entity: 330 Old Niskayuna Road, Latham, NY 
12110.
  Description of Request: $2.955 million will be used for the 
establishment of an additional Civil Support Team. This team, located 
within the New York City metropolitan area, ensures that the top 
terrorist target in the country, New York City, has an immediate and 
prepared asset, ready at a moments notice, if a chemical, biological, 
radiological, nuclear, high explosive, CBRNE, incident were to occur.

                          ____________________
```
#### RACHEL STOKES’ adm’r. v. JOSIAH COWLES and others.

The value of a promisory note, dated March, 1863, payable on demand, is the sum due upon applying the Legislative scale at the time the note was made, and not when payment was demanded.

See Bank of *Qlitwlotte*v. Dmidaon, next proceeding.

Civil aotioN, (to recover a promissory note,) tried before his Honor, *Budge*Albertson, at the August (Special) Term, 1873, of RowaN Superior Court.

At Fall Term, 1870, the case was submitted to a jury, who returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $2000, the full amount of the note sued upon, with interest from the date thereof. The note was dated 2d March, 1873, and made pay. able on demand. In their verdict, the jury in applying the scale to estimate the value of the note in currency, adopted the time of the demand, to wit, March, 1864, as the proper time to ascertain its value; and the plaintiff, insisting that the scale should be applied at the date of the note, moved for a judgment in accordance therewith, notwithstanding the verdict. This motion was continued until the last August Term, when his Honor refused the plaintiff’s motion, whereupon he appealed.

*MeOorlde*& Bailey, for appellant,

cited and relied upon the Act of 1866 — ’67, chap. 44; *Sanders*v. Jarmin, 67 N. C. Rep. 86; *Cable*v. Hardin, Ibid 472 ; *Terrell*v. Walker, 66 N. 0. Rep. 250; also *llrmilton*v. Person, 2 Hay. 236; *Bruton*v. Bullock, Conf. Rep. 372.

No counsel for defendant, in this Court.

RodmaN, J.

There is nothing in this case to distinguish it from the case preceding, *Bank of Charlotte*v. *Davidson,*and numerous other cases of a similar character. The legislative scale must be applied at the date of the note. The Legislature of 1866 thought it equitable that in all eases whether upon *125loans of Confederate money or on purchases of property, *the borrower or purchaser should repay the vdkie which he received.*Snell contracts were not looked on as contracts to deliver stocks or specific articles of fluctuating value, where the damages for the breach would be the price of such articles on the day of delivery. We have felt ourselves bound by the intent and language of the act, and we have no reason to doubt that the assumed equity upon which the act was founded, was the one really and properl}' applicable to such cases.

We do not think that it makes any material difference that the note sued on, was payable on demand, or earlier at the option of the makers; or that it expressed on its face that it was payable in Confederate money.

Judgment below reversed and judgment may be entered here in conformity with this opinion.

Pee Curiam. Judgment reversed.
# C_2014292EN.01004301.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Stal-Florez Botero (la nana)

(Case T-196/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark ‘la nana’ - Earlier national word mark NANA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

2014/C 292/52

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Lina M. Stal-Florez Botero (Maarssen, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 January 2013 (Case R 300/2012-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Lina M. Stal-Florez Botero.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 193 (Friday, January 2, 2009)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1335]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
  No committee meetings were held.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of National Property Analysts Master
Limited Partnership ("NPAMLP") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert McKinney, President of Feldman International, Inc.,
the Equity General Partner of NPAMLP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of operations of NPAMLP.

                      National Property Analysts Master Limited
                      Partnership
                      ----------------------------------------------------------
                      (Registrant)

                      Date:  November 13, 2002
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                      By: Feldman International Inc., its equity general partner
                          ------------------------------------------------------
                      By: /s/ Robert McKinney
                          ------------------------------------------------------
                          Name: Robert McKinney
                          Title:   President