alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Owen Clinton v. Noah Mercer.

From Robeson.

.-A. agrees to deliver to I?, certain specific articles by a particular day, for which B agrees to pay him a certain price. A. neglects to deliver them, for which he is sued. Although upon the trial it do not appear that B has sustained any actual damage, he is entitled to recover nominal damages.

¿For the breach of all valid contracts, when proved to the satisfaction of a .Jury, the law requires damages to be assessed.

This was an action on the case, founded upon the undertaking-of-the Defendant to deliver to the-Plaintiff five hundred tar barrels by a particular day. The Defendant pleaded, non *assumpsit;*and upon the trial, it appeared in evidence that the Defendant, in the fall of the year 1715, agreed to deliver to the Plaintiff by the first day of'March then next ensuing, five hundred tar barrels, for each of which the Plaintiff agreed to pay him, upon the delivery of the barrels, thirty-five cents. The Plaintiff had prepared several tar kilns ready for burning by- the first of March, except as to the logging and turfing of them, which kilns would have yielded several hundred barrels of tar, but not *120as many as five hundred. The Defendant failed to deliver the barrels, or any of them, by the first day of March, nor did he deliver them afterwards. The Plaintiff did not ;lppiy f01. them, nor offer to pay the Defendant for them, until some time in May following, when he went to the Defendant’s house to demand the barrels, and the Defendant being from home, he informed the Defendant’s wife that he hád come to demand the barrels. The price of tar during the month of March, was one dollar and forty cents per barrel: It soon afterwards fell to one dollar, and continued at that price for a considerable time. The Court instructed the Jury, that if they believed the Plaintiff had not sustained any damage by the failure of the Defendant to deliver the barrels by the first day of March, they might find a verdict for the Defendant. If they were of opinion that he had sustained any damage, they should find for the Plaintiff. The Jury found for the Defendant,' and a rule was obtained to shew cause why a new trial should not be granted, on the ground of misdirection by the Court j which rule was sent to this Court, and

Tayxor, Chief-Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

For the breach of all valid contracts, when proved to the satisfaction of a Jury, the law requires damages to be assessed ,• which are greater or loss, according to the injury sustained by the party. Put whenever a non-performance is established, although no real loss be proved, nominal damages, at least, ought to be given. The Court cannot, therefore, approve of the instructions given by the Judge to the Jury, that if they believed the Plaintiff had not really sustained any damage by the failure on the part of the Defendant to deliver the barrels on the day, they might find a verdict for the Defendant. On the contrary, the Jury were bound to find a verdict for the Plaintiff upon a breach of the contract being established. The rule for a new trial must be made absolute.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26187]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Committee 
(AIDS) Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 5, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Samita S. Andreansky, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, 
Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-2915, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 6, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-26187 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 119 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental 

to the United States economy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2018 

Mr. SCALISE (for himself and Mr. MCKINLEY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would 

be detrimental to the United States economy. 

Whereas a carbon tax is a Federal tax on carbon released 

from fossil fuels; 

Whereas a carbon tax will increase energy prices, including 

the price of gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and home 

heating oil; 

Whereas a carbon tax will mean that families and consumers 

will pay more for essentials like food, gasoline, and electricity; 

Whereas a carbon tax will fall hardest on the poor, the elderly, and those on fixed incomes; 

Whereas a carbon tax will lead to more jobs and businesses 

moving overseas; 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 119 IH 

Whereas a carbon tax will lead to less economic growth; 

Whereas American families will be harmed the most from a 

carbon tax; 

Whereas, according to the Energy Information Administration, in 2016, fossil fuels share of energy consumption 

was 81 percent; 

Whereas a carbon tax will increase the cost of every good 

manufactured in the United States; 

Whereas a carbon tax will impose disproportionate burdens 

on certain industries, jobs, States, and geographic regions and would further restrict the global competitiveness of the United States; 

Whereas American ingenuity has led to innovations in energy 

exploration and development and has increased production of domestic energy resources on private and Stateowned land which has created significant job growth and 

private capital investment; 

Whereas United States energy policy should encourage continued private sector innovation and development and not 

increase the existing tax burden on manufacturers; 

Whereas the production of American energy resources increases the United States ability to maintain a competitive advantage in today’s global economy; 

Whereas a carbon tax would reduce America’s global competitiveness and would encourage development abroad in 

countries that do not impose this exorbitant tax burden; 

and 

Whereas the Congress and the President should focus on progrowth solutions that encourage increased development of 

domestic resources: Now, therefore, be it 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 119 IH 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a carbon 

3 tax would be detrimental to American families and busi4 nesses, and is not in the best interest of the United States. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2453
CORA EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-94- 1662-L) Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: August 2, 1996 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cora Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Mc Evoy Smith, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order * affirming the Secretary's final decision denying her claim for divorced spouse survivor's benefits. We have reviewed the record and themagistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Evans v. Secretary, HHS , No. CA-94-1662-L (D. Md. June 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE>
Main Place Real Estate Investment Trust
Exhibit 12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands)
<CAPTION>
                            Nine Months     Year         Year     From Inception
                               Ended        Ended        Ended        Through   
                           September 30, December 31, December 31, December 31, 
                                1997         1996         1995         1994   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                          <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>
Income before taxes........  $   770,752   $  216,709   $  48,070   $    5,459  

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense ........      269,035      255,318     145,822       25,701
  Amortization of debt
    discount and appropriate
    issuance costs.........        2,726        2,856         983            -
                             -------------------------------------------------
     Total fixed charges...      271,761      258,174     146,805       25,701

Earnings...................  $ 1,042,513   $  474,883   $ 194,875   $   31,160
                             =================================================

Fixed charges..............  $   271,761   $  258,174   $ 146,805   $   25,701
                             =================================================
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
     Charges...............         3.84         1.84        1.33         1.21

</TABLE>
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 79 

Honoring Dean Edwards Smith, former head coach for the men’s basketball 

team for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mr. TILLIS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Dean Edwards Smith, former head coach for the 

men’s basketball team for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 

Whereas Dean Edwards Smith, born in Emporia, Kansas, on 

February 28, 1931, spent 44 years dedicating himself to 

the sport of collegiate basketball; 

Whereas Dean Edwards Smith was educated at the University of Kansas and was a member of the men’s basketball 

team for the University of Kansas, which won a National 

Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘NCAA’’) title in 1952; 

Whereas Dean Edwards Smith served as an assistant coach 

for the men’s basketball team for the University of Kansas in 1953 after he graduated; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 79 ATS 

Whereas Dean Edwards Smith served as an assistant coach 

for the men’s basketball team for the United States Air 

Force Academy from 1954 through 1958; 

Whereas Dean Edwards Smith coached the men’s basketball 

team for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 

as an assistant coach from 1958 through 1961, and as 

the head coach from 1961 through 1997; 

Whereas Dean Edwards Smith, during his time at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, led the men’s 

basketball program to 11 appearances in the semifinals 

of the NCAA tournament (commonly known as the 

‘‘Final Four’’), 2 NCAA championships in 1982 and 

1993, and 1 National Invitation Tournament in 1971, 

becoming the most successful men’s collegiate basketball 

coach at the time of his retirement with 879 career victories; 

Whereas Dean Edwards Smith led the men’s basketball team 

for the United States to a gold medal in the 1976 Olympics; and 

Whereas Dean Edwards Smith made invaluable contributions 

to his community, State, and the University of North 

Carolina at Chapel Hill: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) has profound sorrow and deep regret at the 

3 announcement of the death of Dean Edwards Smith; 

4 and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 79 ATS 

1 (2) requests the Secretary of the Senate to pre2 pare an official copy of this resolution for presen3 tation to the family of Dean Edwards Smith. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INNKEEPERS USA TRUST FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,437
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         812,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (74,635)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 767,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        237,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    115,750
<COMMON>                                           347
<OTHER-SE>                                     333,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   767,707
<SALES>                                         25,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,015
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,484
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10671]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, proceedings 
will resume on motions to suspend the rules previously postponed.
  Votes will be taken in the following order:
  S. 3641, by the yeas and nays;
  H.R. 7221, by the yeas and nays.
  The vote on S. 3197 will be taken tomorrow.
  The first electronic vote will be conducted as a 15-minute vote. 
Remaining electronic votes will be conducted as 5-minute votes.

                          ____________________
```
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 7524 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 231

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

c ost

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Deactivation 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 

### 1 $ 85.00



### Inspection 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 

### 1 $ 85.00



### Modification 4.0 $ 340.00 $3,650 $ 3, 990.00 

### 1 $ 3,990.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance: 0



### Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 4,160



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

0.0 $ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysi s ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regu latory action”?

YES * NO

* Explan ation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No ans wer.

YES NO

Explanation: 

### Does not afect small business.

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transpo rtation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a                               ( print page 90339)                            domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 662 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-320, K2025-318.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26587 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7404

IN RE: ALLAH BURMAN, a/k/a A,

Petitioner.

On Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Submitted: January 26, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allah Burman, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Allah Burman petitions this court for a writ of habeas 

corpus, challenging the legality of his detention and seeking 

immediate release. Because Burman is not incarcerated within 

the Fourth Circuit, we lack jurisdiction to grant the requested 

relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(a) (2006). We further conclude it 

is not in the interest of justice to transfer the petition to 

the district court having jurisdiction to entertain it. See 28 

U.S.C. §§ 1631, 2241(b) (2006). Accordingly, we deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10821]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The Honorable Jon Tester led the Pledge of Allegiance, as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```