alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
Main Place Real Estate Investment Trust                                                              Exhibit 12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in Thousands) 
<CAPTION>
                                      Three Months      Year           Year           Year       From Inception
                                         Ended          Ended          Ended          Ended         Through
                                        March 31,    December 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31, 
                                          1998          1997           1996           1995           1994 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                    <C>           <C>             <C>            <C>            <C> 
Income before taxes..................  $  565,724    $  1,293,866    $  216,709     $   48,070     $   5,459 

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense..................     360,134         595,818       255,318        145,822        25,701 
   Amortization of debt discount and
    appropriate issuance costs.......       1,014           3,713         2,856            983             - 
                                       ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Total fixed charges.............     361,148         599,531       258,174        146,805        25,701 

Earnings before fixed charges........  $  926,872    $  1,893,397    $  474,883     $  194,875     $  31,160 
                                       ========================================================================

Fixed charges........................  $  361,148    $    599,531    $  258,174     $  146,805     $  25,701 
                                       ========================================================================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges...        2.57            3.16          1.84           1.33          1.21 

</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-10249

Summary Calendar

____________________

GEORGE G. JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HOUSTON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:96-CV-819-Y)

_________________________________________________________________

July 25, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

George G. Jackson, pro se, appeals the dismissal, pursuant to

FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6), of his complaint against Houston General

Insurance Company (HGIC). Jackson alleged in his complaint that

HGIC offered him a position as a consultant, but withdrew the offer

after he requested that HGIC accommodate his disability by allowing

him to “dress business casual without a tie”. (The complaint does

not specify the nature of Jackson’s disability; in his brief,
- 2 -

Jackson states that, as a result of injuries sustained in an

automobile accident, one of his legs is shorter than the other.)

Jackson claimed that HGIC’s refusal to grant the requested

accommodation violated the Americans with Disabilities Act; and

that it also violated Title VII, because HGIC does not require

female employees to wear neckties.

Needless to say, Jackson failed to state a claim under Title

VII; an employer does not violate Title VII by imposing different

grooming and dress standards for male and female employees. See

Willingham v. Macon Telegraph Publishing Co., 507 F.2d 1084, 1092

(5th Cir. 1975) (en banc); Fountain v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 555

F.2d 753, 755-56 (9th Cir. 1977). And, Jackson failed to state a

claim under the ADA, because he did not allege that he suffers from

an impairment that substantially limits one or more of his major

life activities. See Ellison v. Software Spectrum, Inc., 85 F.3d

187, 190 (5th Cir. 1996).

Accordingly, the judgment dismissing Jackson’s complaint is

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 21.01**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

 

1. Concur Technologies (UK) Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the UnitedKingdom. 

 

2. Concur Technologies (Australia) Pty. Limited, a corporationorganized under the laws of Australia. 

 

3. Concur Technologies Pty. Limited, acorporation organized under the laws of Australia. 

 

4. Captura Software, Inc.,a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. 

 

5. CapturaSoftware International, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the United Kingdom. 

 

6. Outtask LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES — OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, David A. Berg, Chief Executive Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 23rd day of November, 2011.

 

 
|   | By:                              | /s/ David A. Berg |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|   | Name:   David A. Berg            |              |
|   | Title:   Chief Executive Officer |              |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS *

 

I, Patrick F.O’Neal, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A ofSento Corporation;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)                                      designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)                                     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “**Evaluation Date**”); and

 

c)                                      presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)                                      allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)                                     anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.

 
| Date:  August 9, 2004 |                                  |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                       |                                  |
|                       |                                  |
|                       | /s/ PATRICK F. O’ NEAL           |   |
|                       | Patrick F. O’Neal                |
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for July 2016



1.
Cases Pending Beginning of Month 
32




2.
Cases Added to Docket 

Dover High Performance Plastics
No. 14-1268
Directed for Review on July 19, 2016


1

3.
Cases Subtracted From Docket

Action Electric Company
No. 12-1496
Decision on July 6, 2016

Tower Maintenance Corp.
No. 13-0777
Remand Order on July 6, 2016

Central Florida Equipment Rentals, Inc.
No. 08-1656
Decision on July 26, 2016


-3
4.
Total Cases Pending End of Month
30
Back  to Contents

218

| **Exhibit      15.a** |
|-----------------------|

| **Consent      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

To the Board of Management  of Akzo Nobel N.V.:

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File  Nos. 033-36808, 333-06194 and 333-13280) of Akzo Nobel N.V. of our report dated  June 13, 2007, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Akzo Nobel N.V.  and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated  statements of income, cash flows, and changes in equity for each of the years  in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, the related financial statement  schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control  over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness of internal  control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appears  in the 2006 Annual Report on Form 20-F of Akzo Nobel N.V.

Our report dated June 13,  2007, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control  over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting as of December 31, 2006, contains an explanatory paragraph that states  Akzo Nobel N.V. acquired various companies during 2006 (together the Acquired  Companies), and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness  of Akzo Nobel N.V. internal control over financial reporting as of December  31, 2006, The Acquired Companies internal control over financial reporting representing  1.7% (EUR 221 million) of consolidated assets in accordance with IFRS of Akzo  Nobel N.V. and revenues representing 1.5% (EUR 202 million) of consolidated  revenues in accordance with IFRS of Akzo Nobel N.V. as of and for the year ended  December 31, 2006. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of  Akzo Nobel N.V. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial  reporting of The Acquired Companies.

June 13, 2007

| Arnhem,      the Netherlands | KPMG        Accountants N.V. |
|------------------------------|------------------------------|
Amendment No.1 to Cequent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan



  
 Exhibit 10.4

 CEQUENT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 
 Amendment No. 1 To 
 2006 Stock Incentive Plan 

The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of Cequent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly known as Cequent, Inc.) is hereby
amended, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Plan, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The first sentence of Section 4 of the Plan be and hereby is deleted in its entirety and the following is inserted in lieu thereof: 


Subject to adjustment under Section 8, Awards may be made under the Plan for up to 3,173,052 shares of common stock, $.001 par value
per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”). 
  

	 	2.	The following language be and hereby is added as a new Paragraph (j) at the end of Section 9 of the Plan: 


Stockholders’ Agreement. A Participant or Designated Beneficiary shall have no rights as a stockholder with respect to shares
of Common Stock subject to an Award unless and until such Participant or Designated Beneficiary executes and delivers to the Company a Common Stockholder Instrument of Accession to the Stockholders’ Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2006,
as amended from time to time (the “Stockholders’ Agreement”), pursuant to which the Participant or Designated Beneficiary will become bound by the obligations of the Stockholders’ Agreement as a “Common Stockholder”
thereunder. 
  

	 	3.	The following language be and hereby is added as a new Paragraph (g) at the end of Section 10 of the Plan: 


Compliance with Code Section 409A. No Award shall provide for deferral of compensation that does not comply with
Section 409A of the Code, unless the Board, at the time of grant, specifically provides that the Award is not intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code. The Company shall have no liability to a Participant, or to any other party, if
an Award that is intended to be exempt from, or compliant with, Section 409A is not so exempt or compliant or for any action taken by the Board. 
 Adopted by the Board of Directors: October 31, 2006 
 Adopted
by the Stockholders: October 31, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOUND ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         398,516
<SECURITIES>                                 2,760,670
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,359,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,120,765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,183,937
<PP&E>                                       2,998,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                 663,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,519,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,971,053
<BONDS>                                      5,715,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,057
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,782,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,519,080
<SALES>                                     16,287,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,287,812
<CGS>                                       12,354,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,354,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,784,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             278,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,131,467
<INCOME-TAX>                                   810,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,321,467
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,321,467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .245<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .243<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Includes add back of after-tax effect of interest expense for convertible
debentures for 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                        AMENDMENT TO PROJECT MANAGER AGREEMENT


DATED:    AUGUST  21, 1996

PARTIES:  GARY L. MCDONALD REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT CO. 
          (PROJECT MANAGER)

          REGENCY SERVICE CORPORATION (RSC)


                                    AGREEMENT


Exhibit C of the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

In the event that total commissions paid to all parties exceed 6% of the 
total sales price, net of incentives,  the Project Manager's 3% commission 
will be reduced to an amount so that total commissions paid to all parties do 
not exceed 6% of the total sales price, net of incentives.  Said reduction 
shall in no way cause the Project Manager's commission to go negative.



By:         /s/ STEVEN HERTEL  Pres
    -------------------------------------
Regency Service  Corporation, a California Corporation




By:        /s/ GARY L. MCDONALD
    -------------------------------------
Gary L. McDonald Real Estate and Development Co., Inc., a California 
Corporation
OSHA 3386-4N-10
#### First National Bank of Neenah, Appellant, vs. W. J. Durham Lumber Company, Respondent. First National Bank of Menasha, Appellant, vs. Same, Respondent. Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Appellant, vs. Same, Respondent.

*June 25*

October *9, 1934.*

*68For the appellants there was a brief by *Bouck, Hilton, Kluwin & Dempsey*of Oshkosh, and oral argument by *Ray C. Dempsey.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *La Follette, Rogers & Roberts,*and oral argument by *Philip F. La Follette*and *Gordon Sinykin,*all of Madison.

Rosenberry, C. J.

These cases were submitted on the 25th day of June, 1934. A motion for rehearing in *Hanauer v. Republic Building Co., ante,*p. 49, 255 N. W. 136, 256 N. W. 784, was then pending. We have considered these cases and the motion for rehearing in the *Hanauer Case*together. After full reconsideration, we adhere to the determination made in the *Hanauer Case*that sec. 269.58, Stats., is invalid because in conflict with the provisions of the constitution of the United States in the particulars set forth in the memorandum filed in the *Hanauer Case,*on motion for-rehearing, to which reference is hereby made. The section being unconstitutional, other questions raised need not be considered nor discussed. Our conclusion requires a reversal of the order appealed from.

*By the Court.*— The order appealed from in each case, is reversed, and cause remanded with directions to sustain the demurrer and for further proceedings according to law.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, our financial condition and result of  operations. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |                                           |                   |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|                            | WORLDS.COM INC.(Registrant)                    |
|                            |                                           |                   |
| Date: October      1, 2009 | By:                                  | /s/ Thomas Kidrin |
|                            | Thomas      KidrinChief      Executive Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     0

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   36,412
<RECEIVABLES>                                  211,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,926
<INVENTORY>                                    149,214
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               568,598
<PP&E>                                         515,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 302,105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,417,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          468,721
<BONDS>                                        641,963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    47,871
<COMMON>                                       2,571
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,417,294
<SALES>                                        1,470,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,562,943
<CGS>                                          1,346,276
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,389,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,413
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             30,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                24,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,077
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      28,956
<NET-INCOME>                                   41,145
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dean L. Cash,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of ATEL  Financial  Services,  LLC,
General  Partner of ATEL Cash  Distribution  Fund VI, L.P. (the  "Partnership"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:
May 11, 2004


/s/ Dean L. Cash
------------------------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive
Officer of General Partner


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  Partnership  and  will  be  retained  by the  Partnership  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.