alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-39-2024]

On July 8, 2024, City of Phoenix, grantee of FTZ 75, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of LG Energy Solution Arizona, Inc., within Subzone 75V, in Queen Creek, Arizona.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (89 FR 57851-57852, July 16, 2024). On November 5, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including section 400.14.                

Dated: November 5, 2024.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-26022 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### JOHN HAWKINS v. LEWIS SAVAGE, Adm’r.

In an action for a tort committed in 1867, the Statute of Limitations does not begin to run until the 1st day of January, 1870.

.(The case of *Bdwa/rds*y. *Jarvis,*74 N. 0. Rep., 815, cited and approved.)

Civil Actiost, to recover damages, tried before Moore, J., at May Term, 1876, of Edgecombe Superior Court.

■In March, 1867, the intestate of the defendant converted, to his own use, a quantity of fodder, the property of the plaintiff. The -defendant relied upon the Statute of Limitations as a defence to the action. The summons was issued December 30th, 1872. Prior to the commencement of the present action, to-wit: April 1st, 1870, the plaintiff commenced an action for the same cause, but in November, 1871, •entered a non-suit therein.

His Honor held that the Act of March 1st, 1867, secs. 1-2, entitled *“*An Act explanatory of an Act entitled An Act to change the jurisdiction of the Courts and the rules •of pleading therein,” did not apply to actions for torts. The Court rendered judgment for plaintiff, and thereupon the ■defendant appealed.

*W II. Johnson,*for the appellant

*Bridgets, Jr.,*contra.

Seetle, J.

At the last term of this Court it was held., that the time elapsed from the 20th day of May, 1861, until the 1st day of January, 1870, shall not be counted so as to bar actions or suits, or to presume satisfaction or abandonment of rights, save only that actions of debt, coven ant, ¡as-, sumpsit or account upon any contract, demand or penalty incurred since the 1st day of May, 1865, and the remedies thereon shall be in all respects the same as they were in the year 1860. *Edwards*v. *Jarvis,*74 N. C. Rep., 315.

*134The exception leaves all causes of action *ex contractu*arising before the 1st day of May, 1865, and! all actions *ex- delicto*between the 20th day of May, 1.861, and the 1st day of January, 1870, subject to the provisions- of the first and. general proposition.

This being an action in *tort,*the statute did not begin to-run until the 1st day of January, 1870s and consequently is not barred.

It is proper to remark that the- decisions of the- last terra were not published at the time this appeal was taken.

The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.

Let this be certified, &c.

Per Curiam;. Judgment affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40829 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAFAEL ANGEL ASCENCIO-CONTRERAS, also known as Rafael Acencio, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-1078-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rafael Angel Ascencio-Contreras appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than as elements of the offense that must be found by a jury in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000).No. 05-40829 -2- Ascencio-Contreras’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Ascencio-Contreras contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Ascencio-Contreras properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
#### Vote-Berger Company, Appellant, vs. Carter-Wabeno Telephone Company, Respondent.

*October 10*

October *29, 1912.*

*Bills and notes: Payment: Findings of fact: Evidence.*

A finding by the trial court that a promissory note, -which had been returned to the maker marked “paid,” had in fact been paid, is *held*to he sustained by the evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eorest county: John Goodland, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Action to recover on a promissory note which, by inadvertence, as alleged, had been canceled and returned to the maker as paid, contrary to the facts. The defendant, by ‘answer, insisted that the note was duly paid and canceled according to a memorandum thereon.

The evidence was to the effect that the note was given by •defendant December 1, 1908, and returned to the maker March 12, 1909. The memorandum on the paper was as follows: “Paid. *Vote-Berger Company*by C. S. Boley.” Mr. Boley was the bookkeeper, cashier, and auditor for plaintiff and possessed authority to receive payment on the note and cancel it. He returned it by mail, with a letter calling attention thereto, as canceled. There was conflicting testimony, independent of the circumstances aforesaid, respecting payment of the note.

The trial was by the court and resulted in findings in favor of defendant. Judgment was rendered accordingly.

The' cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Mills Tourtellotte*and *~W. A.*Wescott, and for the respondent on that of *John F. Hooper.*

Marshall, J.

The sole complaint by appellant is that the findings are not warranted by the evidence. The case is pre-*104seated in anticipation of tbis court carefully weighing such evidence and noting, efficiently, preponderating weight without regard to the persuasive effect of the trial opinion. This court has no very nicely balanced scale with which to weigh evidence. Such are afforded only in trial jurisdictions. It follows that great weight in favor of findings of fact made there must be accorded thereto and reasonable doubts resolved in favor thereof. Unless the evidence so strongly preponderates against the same as to indicate, clearly, that they are wrong notwithstanding the presumption in their favor, they cannot be disturbed. Tested thereby, we are constrained to hold that the findings here give the correct state of the case.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 119 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas a carbon tax is a Federal tax on carbon released 

from fossil fuels; 

Whereas a carbon tax will increase energy prices, including 

the price of gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and home 

heating oil; 
2 

•HCON 119 EH 

Whereas a carbon tax will mean that families and consumers 

will pay more for essentials like food, gasoline, and electricity; 

Whereas a carbon tax will fall hardest on the poor, the elderly, and those on fixed incomes; 

Whereas a carbon tax will lead to more jobs and businesses 

moving overseas; 

Whereas a carbon tax will lead to less economic growth; 

Whereas American families will be harmed the most from a 

carbon tax; 

Whereas, according to the Energy Information Administration, in 2016, fossil fuels share of energy consumption 

was 81 percent; 

Whereas a carbon tax will increase the cost of every good 

manufactured in the United States; 

Whereas a carbon tax will impose disproportionate burdens 

on certain industries, jobs, States, and geographic regions and would further restrict the global competitiveness of the United States; 

Whereas American ingenuity has led to innovations in energy 

exploration and development and has increased production of domestic energy resources on private and Stateowned land which has created significant job growth and 

private capital investment; 

Whereas United States energy policy should encourage continued private sector innovation and development and not 

increase the existing tax burden on manufacturers; 

Whereas the production of American energy resources increases the United States ability to maintain a competitive advantage in today’s global economy; 
3 

•HCON 119 EH 

Whereas a carbon tax would reduce America’s global competitiveness and would encourage development abroad in 

countries that do not impose this exorbitant tax burden; 

and 

Whereas the Congress and the President should focus on progrowth solutions that encourage increased development of 

domestic resources: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a carbon 

3 tax would be detrimental to American families and busi4 nesses, and is not in the best interest of the United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 119 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

would be detrimental to the United States economy. 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax
##### 



Exhibit 32.3 CERTIFICATION PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation for the quarter ended June 30,
2004, I, P. Chrisman Iribe, President of Indiantown Cogeneration Funding
Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:  (1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation. August 12, 2004
    /s/ P. CHRISMAN IRIBEP. Chrisman IribePresident
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. and will be retained by Indiantown
Cogeneration, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request
Page 1 of 1

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on May 31, 2019

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETE

D

TYPE

*

BRIEFING

NOTICE

DATE

BRIEFIN

G

STATUS

COMMISSIONE

R NOT

PARTICIPATING

1 14-1688 Science Applications

International Corp.,

d/b/a SAIC

06/23/16 DFR 10/31/16 Closed

2 15-1121 Clean Fuels of

Indiana, Inc.

06/30/16 DFR 11/09/16 Closed

3 14-1268 Dover High

Performance Plastics

07/19/16 DFR 11/01/16 Closed

4 15-1347 Gate Precast Co. 11/10/16 DFR 12/05/16 Closed

5 16-1533 Cooper/T. Smith

Corporation, d/b/a

Blakeley Boatworks,

Inc.

04/27/17 DFR 04/27/17 Closed

6 16-0803 The Lane

Construction

Corporation

05/23/17 DFR 09/14/17 Closed

7 16-1167 Aerospace Testing

Alliance

08/22/17 DFR 11/20/17 Closed

8 15-1069 Healy Tibbitts

Builders, Inc.

10/27/17 DFR 11/13/17 Closed

9 16-0940 Angel Brothers

Enterprises, Ltd.

11/17/17 DFR 12/15/17 Closed

10 17-0190 Shelly & Sands, Inc. 05/02/18 DFR 05/10/18 Closed

11 15-1574 MasTec North

America dba MasTec

Advanced

Technologies, Inc.

06/20/18 DFR 07/10/18 Closed

12 17-0949 Walmart, Inc. 07/12/18 DFR 08/09/18 Closed

13 16-1587 TNT Crane &

Rigging, Inc.

10/16/18 DFR 10/30/18 Closed

14 17-1214 Mansfield Industrial,

Inc.

11/23/18 DFR 01/03/19 Closed

15 17-0483 Ceco Concrete

Construction, LLC

11/28/18 DFR 12/19/18 Closed

16 16-1628 Schaad Detective

Agency, Inc.

12/18/18 DFR 01/07/19 Closed

17 17-1174 Wayne Farms, LLC 03/01/19 DFR 03/21/19 Open

18 17-2144 Tampa Electric

Company

04/09/19 DFR 04/23/19 Open

*DFR – Direction For Review

REM – Appellate Remand

INT REV – Interlocutory Review
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CyberGuard Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick J. Clawson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|                                                            
|/s/    PATRICK J. CLAWSON                                   
|                                                            
|Patrick J. Clawson Chief Executive Officer February 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 187 (Friday, December 12, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10959]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 Senate

Friday, December 12, 2008

(Legislative day of Wednesday, December 10, 2008)

  The Senate met at 10 and 23 seconds a.m., on the expiration of the 
recess, and was called to order by the Honorable Carl Levin, a Senator 
from the State of Michigan.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 104 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 104

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1892, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) Insert before section 1 the following:

             ``DIVISION A--HONORING HOMETOWN HEROES ACT''.

            (2) In section 1, strike ``Act'' and insert ``division''.
            (3) In section 2, after ``a `public safety officer' as 
        defined in section 1204 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control 
        and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10284)'', insert the 
        following: ``.''.
    ``(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to deaths of first responders occurring on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.''.
            (4) At the end of division G, strike the following: ``.''.
    ``(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to deaths of first responders occurring on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 104

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

       Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1892.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CAREDATA.COM, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,018
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,835
<PP&E>                                          10,047
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,809
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,255
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,606
<SALES>                                         11,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,068
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       215
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (474)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (474)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 14, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 31, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 598 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-238, K2025-236.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26358 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for January 2021

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month							23

2. Cases Added to Docket								0


  
3. Cases Subtracted from Docket							-1

Schaad Detective Agency, Inc.
No. 16-1628
Decision issued on January 15, 2021


4. Total Cases Pending End of Month							22