alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on October 31, 2016

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 09-1901 Seward Ship’s 

Drydock, Inc. 11/14/11 DFR 11/21/11, 04/17/13 Closed

2 10-1372 Briones Utility Co. 08/20/12 DFR 09/05/12 Closed

3 08-1774 Angelica Textile 

Services, Inc. 09/28/12 DFR 10/16/12 Closed

4 11-2395 Kiewit Power 

Constructors Co. 01/24/13 DFR 03/04/13 Closed

5 12-0643 K.M. Davis 

Contracting, Inc. 01/25/13 DFR 01/30/13 Closed

6 11-2780 Peacock 

Engineering, Inc. 05/22/13 DFR 05/30/13 Closed

7 11-1734 Calpine 

Corporation 06/24/13 DFR 06/26/13 Closed

8 10-0637

BP Products North 

America, Inc., & 

BP-Husky 

Refining, LLC

09/16/13 DFR 11/01/13 Closed

9 11-2559 Jim Boyd 

Construction, Inc. 01/22/14 DFR 01/31/14 Closed

10 12-1600 Envision Waste 

Services 02/10/14 DFR 02/24/1404/16/14 Closed

11 12-2142

Meadows 

Construction 

Company, LLC

06/05/14 DFR 06/24/14 Closed

12 12-2385 Evergreen 

Construction Co. 08/11/14 DFR 10/24/14 Closed

13 12-1617 Houston 

Aquarium, Inc. 09/18/14 DFR 10/20/14 Closed

14 13-1022

Mid South 

Waffles, Inc., d/b/a 

Waffle House 

#1283

12/31/14 DFR 02/03/15 Closed

15 14-0948 Florida Gas 

Contractors, Inc. 01/15/15 DFR 02/06/15 Closed

16 12-1287 CSA Equipment 

Company, LLC 01/16/15 DFR 02/09/15 Closed

17 13-0224 A.H. Sturgill 

Roofing, Inc. 03/23/15 DFR 04/08/15 Closed

18 13-1817 Missouri Basin 

Well Service Inc. 04/23/15 DFR 05/07/15 Closed

19 14-0844 Quick Transport of 

Arkansas, LLC 07/01/15 DFR 07/28/15 Closed
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on October 31, 2016

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

20 13-1124 Integra Health 

Management, Inc. 07/21/15 DFR 09/18/15 Closed

21 13-0900 Suncor Energy 

(U.S.A.) Inc. 08/31/15 DFR 09/18/15 Closed

22 13-1169 North Eastern 

Precast LLC 10/29/15 DFR 11/02/15 Closed

23 13-1170 Masonry Services 

Inc. dba MSI 10/29/15 DFR 11/02/15 Closed

24 13-0644 Wynnewood 

Refining Co., LLC 03/03/16 DFR 03/18/16 Closed

25 13-0791 Wynnewood 

Refining Co., LLC 03/03/16 DFR 03/18/16 Closed

26 14-1688

Science 

Applications 

International 

Corp., d/b/a SAIC

06/23/16 DFR 10/31/16 Open

27 15-1121 Clean Fuels of 

Indiana, Inc. 06/30/16 DFR

28 15-1121

Dover High 

Performance 

Plastics

07/19/16 DFR

*DFR – Direction for Review

REM – Appellate Remand

INT REV - Interlocutory Review
## EEO Information

Affirmative Action Plan FY 2023

EEO Data Pursuant to the No FEAR Act

EEO Policy Statement

Anti-Harassment Policy Statement

Anti-Harassment Policy

Harassment Reporting & Investigation Procedures

 

 

**Angela D. Bridges**abridges@oshrc.gov(202) 606-5380EEO DirectorAlternative Dispute Resolution Program ManagerAnti-Harassment (EEO related matters)

 

 

U.S. Office of Special Counsel
----

(2004/C 88 E/0525)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0584/04

by Nirj Deva (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(26 February 2004)

Subject:   EU aid money to Zimbabwe

Following observations noted by the Court of Auditors in its Annual Report for the financial year 2002, more precisely in the part entitled ‘Report on the activities of the 6th, 7th and 8th European Development Funds’, Chapter V — ‘A special case: The decision taken by the General Affairs Council and the monetary situation in Zimbabwe’ (1), I would like to ask if the Commission is going to start an official audit enquiry into the implementation of its financial aid to Zimbabwe, which enabled black-listed members of the Mugabe regime — as listed in Council Regulation (EC) No 310/2002 (2) concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe, Article 2 and Annex 1 — to enrich themselves with EU money by applying ‘an exchange rate which bears no relation to money-market realities and which, in 2002, reduced the value of the EDF resources by 89 %, to the detriment of the people on whom the aid had been retargeted’ (see Court of Auditors Annual Report 2002, Chapter V, Paragraph 68(a))?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(6 April 2004)

The Commission does not accept the Court of Auditors' analysis of the situation for the following reasons:

Total Community aid to Zimbabwe in 2002 came to EUR 94 million, of which only EUR 8 million was spent inside the country. Food aid, agricultural inputs, and medical supplies, for instance, were bought from neighbouring countries.

For these reasons, the Commission sees no justification for an audit enquiry.

----

(1)OJ C 286, 28.11.2003, p. 355 et seq.

(2)OJ L 50, 21.2.2002, p. 4.

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10829]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 154

WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2008

No. 176
```
# Official Journal L 54I/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 054I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6126 February 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 054I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6126 February 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/281 of 26 February 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them | 1 |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/282 of 26 February 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/283 of 26 February 2018 amending Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 concerning restrictive measures against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them | 6 |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2018/284 of 26 February 2018 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria | 8 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/281 of 26 February 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them

1

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/282 of 26 February 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

3

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/283 of 26 February 2018 amending Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 concerning restrictive measures against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them

6

*

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2018/284 of 26 February 2018 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

8

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### McGovern, Trustee, Respondent, vs. Eckhart, imp., Appellant.

*March 7*

June *18, 1928.*

*180For the appellant there were briefs by *C. J. Smith,*attorney, and /. *Henry Bennett,*of counsel, both of Viroqua, and oral argument by *Mr. Smith.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Grady, Farns-worth & Walker*of Portage, and oral argument by *Daniel H. Grady.*

The following opinion was filed April 3, 1928:

Crown hart, J.

This case was here on a former appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, seeking to recover the penalty provided in sec. 116.04, Stats. *McGovern v. Eckhart,*192 Wis. 558, 213 N. W. 332.

In that case the construction of the statutes, secs. 116.03 and 116.04, was involved, and this court, following the decision in *Quiggle v. Herman,*131 Wis. 379, 111 N. W. 479, held that the giver and taker of the note were *in pari delicto,*and for that reason, if for no other, plaintiff could not recover the penalty. That decision is the law of this case, so far as the status of the parties is concerned under secs. 116.03 and 116.04, Stats. *Roberts v. Gerber,*194 Wis. 509, 217 N. W. 691; *Borosich v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.*194 Wis. 289, 215 N. W. 575.

In the present case the complaint was amended, but the parties are the same, the same facts are involved, and the relief sought depends upon a contrary construction of the statute than was given in the former case. The trustee has no *181greater right than the defendant Kraus had. If Kraus, in giving the note, was in equal wrong under the statute with Eckhart in taking the note, then Kraus clearly cannot recover on the facts stated in the third cause of action. We express no opinion as to the right of the trustee to a common-law right of action for damages by reason of a fraud perpetrated on Kraus by Eckhart, if any.

If the *Quiggle Case, supra,*were before this court as an original proposition, we should not hold the parties to the transaction as to the execution and delivery of the note *in pari delicto.*The court was clearly in error, probably for the reason that it overlooked the fact that the penalty provided was in sec. 116.04 instead of being in sec. 116.03, and applied only to the taker of the note.

On the former appeal the complaint, in its third cause of action, sought to recover the penalty provided in the statute for its violation.

In the *Quiggle Case, supra,*the court held the note given in violation of the statute was void, but queried whether the maker might not be estopped from setting up that fact when the note had passed into the hands of an innocent purchaser. However, in *Arnd v. Sjoblom,*131 Wis. 642, 111 N. W. 666, it was held that such a note, under the negotiable instrument statutes, in the hands of a purchaser in due course was valid as to him.

*By the Court.*— The order of the circuit court is reversed,

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on June 18, 1928.
# C_2022427EN.01004701.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/47

---

EUROPEAN HEALTH AND DIGITAL EXECUTIVE AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/47)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://hadea.ec.europa.eu/about/legal-base-and-key-documents_en

---
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for April 2017

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 28

2. Cases Added to Docket 3

Cooper/T. Smith Corporation 

d/b/a Blakeley Boatworks, Inc. 

No. 16-1533

Direction for Review on April 27, 2017

Peacock Engineering, Inc. 

No. 11-2780-A

Severed by the Commission from Docket No. 11-2780 on April 27, 2017

True Value Company

No. 16-0597

Direction for Review and Remand on April 27, 2017

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket 6

Evergreen Construction Company

No. 12-2385 

Decision on April 26, 2017

K.M. Davis Contracting, Inc.

No. 12-0643

Decision on April 26, 2017

Manson Construction Company

No. 14-0816

Decision on April 27, 2017

Peacock Engineering, Inc. 

Docket No. 11-2780

Decision on April 27, 2017

Peacock Engineering, Inc. 

Docket No. 11-2780-A

Decision on April 27, 2017

True Value Company

No. 16-0597

Direction for Review and Remand on April 27, 2017

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 25
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2362]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       HONORING THE LIFE AND SERVICE OF MR. ANTONIO RUGIERO, SR.

                                 ______
                                 

                       HON. THADDEUS G. McCOTTER

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. McCOTTER. Madam Speaker, today I rise to honor and acknowledge 
the remarkable life and legacy of Antonio Rugiero, Sr. upon his passing 
at the age of 70.
  Antonio was born in San Giovanni Fiore, Calabria, Italy on June 18, 
1938. He attended the Peitra Fitta Monasteri in Cosenza, Italy and 
later completed his college business degree. In 1960, he arrived in 
America and two years later borrowed $2,000 to begin his pursuit of the 
American dream. With his funds, a small pizzeria named Roman Village 
Restaurant was born. With his incredible commitment to make his 
business a success, Papa Rugiero created a thriving business. His sons 
carried on Antonio's tradition of excellent food and premier service by 
opening Antonio's Cucina Italiana, named after their father. Four 
restaurants later, it is clear that Antonio's family has created a 
legacy.
  Antonio Rugiero, Sr. was a man deeply involved in the Detroit area 
community. He never hesitated to sponsor local events, such as kid's 
hockey teams, baseball and football teams. Along with supporting his 
wonderful family, Antonio was a community leader in contributing to 
charitable causes including Dearborn Heights Spirit Fest, the Feast of 
Saint Antonio, Dine Out Detroit, Breast Cancer Awareness, Diabetes 
Foundation and numerous others.
  On October 19, 2008, Antonio passed away. A beloved husband, father, 
and grandfather, he is survived by his loving wife, Enrica, four sons 
Patrick Attilio, Mark Luigi, Robert Attilio, and Anthony Rugiero, Jr., 
and ten grandchildren.
  Madam Speaker, Antonio Rugiero, Sr. was a man of great respect, a 
successful entrepreneur, and a loving husband and father. Today, as we 
bid him farewell, I ask my colleagues to join me in mourning his 
passing and honoring his lifetime of contribution to our community.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                      AMERCO and Consolidated Subsidiaries

      Exhibit 12.  Statement Re: Computation of Ratios


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Year end
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                           2002    2001    2000    1999    1998
                                        ---------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>       <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>
Pretax earnings from operations         $   5.0     5.8    99.7    94.7    75.0
Plus:  Interest expense                   106.8   109.0    97.2    85.6    89.3
       Preferred stock dividends           13.0    13.0    13.6    17.4    20.8
       Amortization of debt expense
         and discounts                      1.1     0.8     0.5     0.3     0.3
       A portion of rental expense
         (1/3)                             58.5    57.7    43.7    39.6    30.0
                                        ---------------------------------------

     Subtotal (A)                         184.4   186.3   254.7   237.6   215.4
                                        ---------------------------------------


Divided by:


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                        106.8   109.0    97.2    85.6    89.3
  Preferred stock dividends                13.0    13.0    13.6    17.4    20.8
  A portion of rental expense (1/3)        58.5    57.7    43.7    39.6    30.0
  Interest capitalized during the
    period                                  2.0     2.5     1.4     0.9     2.2
  Amortization of debt expense
    and discounts                           1.1     0.8     0.5     0.3     0.3
                                        ----------------------------------------

     Subtotal (B)                       $ 181.4   183.0   156.4   143.8   142.6
                                        ---------------------------------------

     Ratio of earnings to fixed
       charges (A)/(B)                     1.02    1.02    1.63    1.65    1.51
                                        =======================================
</TABLE>


         AMERCO believes that one-third of AMERCO's annual rental expense is a
reasonable approximation of the interest factor of such rentals.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James L. Schaeffer,certify that:

1.           I have reviewed this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Polymer Group, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: November 15,  2004 |   | /s/ JAMES L. SCHAEFFER                        |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | James L.  Schaeffer *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 106 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY 

4 TO PRESENT THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD 

5 MEDAL TO THE OFFICE OF STRATEGIC SERV6 ICES. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

8 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on March 
2 

•HCON 106 EH 

1 21, 2018, for a ceremony to present the Congressional 

2 Gold Medal collectively to the members of the Office of 

3 Strategic Services (OSS), in recognition of their superior 

4 service and major contributions during World War II. 

5 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

6 ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out 

7 in accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed 

8 by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 27, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 106 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for a 

Strategic Services. Medal collectively to the members of the Office of ceremony to present the Congressional Gold
#### Integrity Savings Building & Loan Association, Plaintiff, vs. Nixdorf and another, Defendants and Appellants, and Federal Mortgage Company, imp., Respondent.

*January 10*

February *5, 1929.*

The cause was submitted for the appellants on the brief of *Arthur H. Bartelt*of San Antonio, Texas, and *Fred D. Huber*of Milwaukee, and for the respondent Federal Mortgage Company on that of *Aaron B. Rosenthal*of Milwaukee.

Crownhart, J.

The defendants re-allege the fifth paragraph of their second defense, which, together with the balance of the third defense, among other things, contains a *140general denial of the giving of the mortgage by Mary Nix-dorf, or the note secured thereby.

In the third defense it is also alleged that the giving of the mortgage and note was done through a corrupt agreement between the plaintiff and one J. Murray O’Brien, to secure usury.

The answer as a whole is not a model pleading, and may be subject to motions to make more accurate, definite, or certain, but on demurrer each defense must stand on its own allegations, and we deem the third defense good within the rule of liberality of construction now prevailing. As is said in *McIntyre v. Carroll,*193 Wis. 382, 387, 214 N. W. 366:

> “The present-day Code permits of speedy methods of requiring pleadings to be made more accurate, definite, or certain when they appear to the opposite party to be too diffuse, discursive, covering too much territory, or aiming in too many directions. All these possible defects may be and should be cured by appropriate motions under such provisions as are embodied in secs. 263.43 and 263.44, Stats.”

*By the Court.*— The order of the circuit court is reversed, with costs to the appellant.