Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 88657 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2023–0062; FRL–12158–01– 

OCSPP] 

Fluindapyr; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of fluindapyr in 

or on soybean, forage; soybean, hay; 

soybean, hulls; and soybean, seed. FMC 

Corporation requested these tolerances 

under the Federal Food, Drug, and 

Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

November 8, 2024. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before January 7, 2025, and must 

be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2023–0062, is 

available at https://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room, and for the OPP 

Docket is (202) 566–1744. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles Smith, Registration Divison 

(7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 

20460–0001; main telephone number: 

(202) 566–1030; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Office of the Federal Register’s eCFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/ 

current/title-40. 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2023–0062 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing and must be received 

by the Hearing Clerk on or before 

January 7, 2025. Addresses for mail and 

hand delivery of objections and hearing 

requests are provided in 40 CFR 

178.25(b). 

EPA’s Office of Administrative Law 

Judges (OALJ), in which the Hearing 

Clerk is housed, urges parties to file and 

serve documents by electronic means 

only, notwithstanding any other 

particular requirements set forth in 

other procedural rules governing those 

proceedings. See ‘‘Revised Order Urging 

Electronic Service and Filing’’, dated 

June 22, 2023, which can be found at 

https://www.epa.gov/system/files/ 

documents/2023-06/2023-06-22%20- 

%20revised%20order%20urging%20

electronic%20filing%20and%20

service.pdf. Although EPA’s regulations 

require submission via U.S. Mail or 

hand delivery, EPA intends to treat 

submissions filed via electronic means 

as properly filed submissions; therefore, 

EPA believes the preference for 

submission via electronic means will 

not be prejudicial. When submitting 

documents to the OALJ electronically, a 

person should utilize the OALJ e-filing 

system at https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/ 

eab/eab-alj_upload.nsf. 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2023–0062, by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Do not submit electronically 

any information you consider to be CBI 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at https://

www.epa.gov/dockets/where-sendcomments-epa-dockets. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at https:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. Summary of Petitioned-For 

Tolerance 

In the Federal Register of July 5, 2023 

(88 FR 42935) (FRL–10579–05–OCSPP), 

EPA issued a document pursuant to 

FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 

346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a 

pesticide petition (PP 2F9020) by FMC 

Corporation, 2929 Walnut Street, 

Philadelphia, PA 19104. The petition 

requested that 40 CFR part 180 be 

amended by establishing tolerances for 

residues of the fungicide fluindapyr, in 

or on soybean, forage at 15 parts per 

million (ppm); soybean, hay at 30 ppm; 

soybean, hulls at 0.6 ppm; soybean, seed 

at 0.2 ppm. That document referenced a 

summary of the petition prepared by 

FMC Corporation, the registrant, which 

is available in the docket, https://

www.regulations.gov. There were no 

comments received in response to the 

notice of filing. 

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and 

Determination of Safety 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA 

allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the 

legal limit for a pesticide chemical 

residue in or on a food) only if EPA 

determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA 

defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
88658 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 

pesticide chemical residue, including 

all anticipated dietary exposures and all 

other exposures for which there is 

reliable information.’’ This includes 

exposure through drinking water and in 

residential settings but does not include 

occupational exposure. Section 

408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 

give special consideration to exposure 

of infants and children to the pesticide 

chemical residue in establishing a 

tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to infants and children from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue. . . .’’ 

Consistent with FFDCA section 

408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified 

therein, EPA has reviewed the available 

scientific data and other relevant 

information in support of this action. 

EPA has sufficient data to assess the 

hazards of and to make a determination 

on aggregate exposure for fluindapyr, 

including exposure resulting from the 

tolerances established by this action. 

EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks 

associated with fluindapyr follows. 

In an effort to streamline its 

publications in the Federal Register, 

EPA is not reprinting sections of the 

rule that repeat what has been 

previously published in tolerance 

rulemakings for the same pesticide 

chemical. Where scientific information 

concerning a particular chemical 

remains unchanged, the content of those 

sections would not vary between 

tolerance rulemakings, and EPA 

considers referral back to those sections 

as sufficient to provide an explanation 

of the information EPA considered in 

making its safety determination for the 

new rulemaking. 

EPA has previously published a 

tolerance rulemaking for fluindapyr in 

which EPA concluded, based on the 

available information, that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm would 

result from aggregate exposure to 

fluindapyr and established tolerances 

for residues of that chemical. EPA is 

incorporating previously published 

sections from that rulemaking as 

described further in this rule, as they 

remain unchanged. 

A. Toxicological Profile 

EPA has evaluated the available 

toxicity data and considered its validity, 

completeness, and reliability as well as 

the relationship of the results of the 

studies to human risk. EPA has also 

considered available information 

concerning the variability of the 

sensitivities of major identifiable 

subgroups of consumers, including 

infants and children. 

Specific information on the studies 

received and the nature of the adverse 

effects caused by fluindapyr as well as 

the no-observed-adverse-effect-level 

(NOAEL) and the lowest-observedadverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the 

toxicity studies are discussed in the 

final rule published in Unit III.A. of the 

Federal Register of March 9, 2021 (86 

FR 13459) (FRL–10019–19). 

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/ 

Levels of Concern 

Once a pesticide’s toxicological 

profile is determined, EPA identifies 

toxicological points of departure (POD) 

and levels of concern (LOC) to use in 

evaluating the risk posed by human 

exposure to the pesticide. For hazards 

that have a threshold below which there 

is no appreciable risk, the toxicological 

POD is used as the basis for derivation 

of reference values for risk assessment. 

PODs are developed based on a careful 

analysis of the doses in each 

toxicological study to determine the 

dose at which no adverse effects are 

observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest 

dose at which adverse effects of concern 

are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/ 

safety factors are used in conjunction 

with the POD to calculate a safe 

exposure level—generally referred to as 

a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a 

reference dose (RfD)—and a safe margin 

of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold 

risks, the Agency assumes that any 

amount of exposure will lead to some 

degree of risk. Thus, the Agency 

estimates risk in terms of the probability 

of an occurrence of the adverse effect 

expected in a lifetime. For more 

information on the general principles 

EPA uses in risk characterization and a 

complete description of the risk 

assessment process, see https://

www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/assessinghuman-health-risk-pesticides. 

A summary of the toxicological 

endpoints for fluindapyr used for 

human risk assessment can be found at 

https://www.regulations.gov in 

document ‘‘Fluindapyr. Human Health 

Risk Assessment for Section 3 

Registration and Tolerance Requests for 

Use on Soybeans and Proposed New 

Uses on Sod Farms, Athletic Fields and 

Residential Turfgrass and Lawns,’’ 

hereinafter ‘‘Fluindapyr Human Health 

Risk Assessment’’ on pages 19–20 in 

Docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2023– 

0062. 

C. Exposure Assessment 

1. Dietary exposure from food and 

feed uses. In evaluating dietary 

exposure to fluindapyr, EPA considered 

exposure under the petitioned-for 

tolerances as well as all existing 

fluindapyr tolerances in 40 CFR 

180.716. EPA assessed dietary 

exposures from fluindapyr in food as 

follows: 

i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute 

dietary exposure and risk assessments 

are performed for a food-use pesticide, 

if a toxicological study has indicated the 

possibility of an effect of concern 

occurring as a result of a 1-day or single 

exposure. Such effects were identified 

for fluindapyr. In estimating acute 

dietary exposure, EPA used 2003–2008 

food consumption information from the 

United States Department of Agriculture 

(USDA) Nationwide Health and 

Nutrition Examination Survey, What We 

Eat in America (NHANES/WWEIA). As 

to residue levels in food, the acute 

analysis assumed 100% crop treated 

(PCT) for all commodities, highest 

average field trial (HAFT) residue 

values, empirical and default processing 

factors, and anticipated livestock 

residues based on calculated livestock 

dietary burden and tissue transfer rates 

from the livestock feeding studies. 

ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting 

the chronic dietary exposure assessment 

EPA used 2005–2010 food consumption 

data from the USDA’s NHANES/ 

WWEIA. As to residue levels in food, 

chronic analysis assumed 100 PCT for 

all commodities, field trial mean residue 

values, empirical and default processing 

factors and anticipated livestock dietary 

burden and tissue transfer rates from the 

livestock feeding studies and metabolite 

ratios from the metabolism studies. 

iii. Cancer. Based on the data 

referenced in Unit III.A., EPA has 

concluded that fluindapyr does not pose 

a cancer risk to humans. Therefore, a 

dietary exposure assessment for the 

purpose of assessing cancer risk is 

unnecessary. 

2. Dietary exposure from drinking 

water. The proposed uses do not result 

in an increase in the estimated residue 

levels in drinking water, so the 

estimated drinking water concentration 

used in the March 9, 2021, final rule is 

the same as those used in this 

assessment. 

3. From non-dietary exposure. The 

term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in 

this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure 

(e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, 

indoor pest control, termiticides, and 

flea and tick control on pets). 

Fluindapyr is currently registered for 

the following uses that could result in 

residential exposures: turf in public 

areas (i.e., golf courses and landscape 

areas around public, intuitional, and 

commercial properties). The currently 

registered use on turf in public areas 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 88659 

will result in short-term (1 to 30 days) 

residential post-application dermal 

exposures to adults. It will also result in 

residential post-application exposure in 

children 1 to less than 2 years old 

(combined dermal and hand-to-mouth 

exposure). 

4. Cumulative effects from substances 

with a common mechanism of toxicity. 

Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA 

requires that, when considering whether 

to establish, modify, or revoke a 

tolerance, the Agency consider 

‘‘available information’’ concerning the 

cumulative effects of a particular 

pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other 

substances that have a common 

mechanism of toxicity.’’ 

EPA has not found fluindapyr to share 

a common mechanism of toxicity with 

any other substances, and fluindapyr 

does not appear to produce a toxic 

metabolite produced by other 

substances. For the purposes of this 

tolerance action, therefore, EPA has 

assumed that fluindapyr does not have 

a common mechanism of toxicity with 

other substances. For information 

regarding EPA’s efforts to determine 

which chemicals have a common 

mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate 

the cumulative effects of such 

chemicals, see EPA’s website at https:// 

www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/cumulativeassessment-risk-pesticides. 

D. Safety Factor for Infants and 

Children 

Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA 

provides that EPA shall apply an 

additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety 

for infants and children in the case of 

threshold effects to account for prenatal 

and postnatal toxicity and the 

completeness of the database on toxicity 

and exposure unless EPA determines 

based on reliable data that a different 

margin of safety will be safe for infants 

and children. This additional margin of 

safety is commonly referred to as the 

Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) 

Safety Factor (SF). EPA is retaining the 

10X FQPA SF or all exposure 

assessments except acute and chronic 

dietary exposure for the need of the 

comparative thyroid assay (CTA). See 

Unit III.D. of the March 9, 2021, 

rulemaking for a discussion of the 

Agency’s rationale for that 

determination. 

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of 

Safety 

EPA determines whether acute and 

chronic dietary pesticide exposures are 

safe by comparing dietary exposure 

estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and 

chronic PAD (cPAD). Short-, 

intermediate-, and chronic-term 

aggregate risks are evaluated by 

comparing the estimated total food, 

water, and residential exposure to the 

appropriate PODs to ensure that an 

adequate MOE exists. 

1. Acute risk. An acute aggregate risk 

assessment takes into account acute 

exposure estimates from dietary 

consumption of food and drinking 

water. Using the exposure assumptions 

discussed in this unit for acute 

exposure, the acute dietary exposure 

from food and water to fluindapyr will 

occupy 9% of the aPAD for all infants 

under 1 year old, the population group 

receiving the greatest exposure. 

2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure 

assumptions described in this unit for 

chronic exposure, EPA has concluded 

that chronic exposure to fluindapyr 

from food and water will utilize 44% of 

the cPAD for infants under 1 year old 

the population group receiving the 

greatest exposure. Based on the 

explanation in Unit III.C.3., regarding 

residential use patterns, chronic 

residential exposure to residues of 

fluindapyr is not expected. 

3. Short-term risk. Short-term 

aggregate exposure takes into account 

short-term residential exposure plus 

chronic exposure to food and water 

(considered to be a background 

exposure level). Short-term and 

intermediate-term endpoints are 

identical, and so short-term aggregate 

exposure would be considered 

protective of intermediate-term 

aggregate exposures. Regarding shortterm risk, the four population subgroups 

assessed for residential post-application 

exposures are: adults, youth 11 to less 

than 16 years old, children 6 to less than 

11 years old, and children 1 to less than 

2 years old. Of the four population 

subgroups, the children 1 to less than 2 

years old represent the highest exposure 

from post-application exposures 

(combined dermal and hand-to-mouth 

exposure). However, based on registered 

use patterns, intermediate-term 

exposure is not expected for the 

residential exposure pathway. 

Therefore, intermediate-term aggregate 

risk is not estimated. 

Using the exposure assumptions 

described in this unit for short-term 

exposures, EPA has concluded the 

combined short-term food, water, and 

residential exposures result in aggregate 

MOEs for adults, children 11 to less 

than 16 years old, children 6 to less than 

11 years old, and children 1 to less than 

2 years old of 2100, 6500, 5100, and 

1100 respectively. Because EPA’s level 

of concern for fluindapyr is a MOE of 

1,000 or below, these MOEs are not of 

concern. 

4. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. 

population. Based on the lack of 

evidence of carcinogenicity in two 

adequate rodent carcinogenicity studies, 

fluindapyr is not expected to pose a 

cancer risk to humans. 

5. Determination of safety. Based on 

the risk assessment and information 

described above, EPA concludes that 

there is a reasonable certainty that no 

harm will result to the general 

population, or to infants and children 

from aggregate exposure to fluindapyr 

residues. 

IV. Other Considerations 

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology 

For a discussion of the available 

enforcement analytical methods, see 

Unit IV.A. of the March 9, 2021, 

rulemaking. 

B. International Residue Limits 

In making its tolerance decisions, EPA 

seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with 

international standards whenever 

possible, consistent with U.S. food 

safety standards and agricultural 

practices. EPA considers the 

international maximum residue limits 

(MRLs) established by the Codex 

Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as 

required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). 

The Codex Alimentarius is a joint 

United Nations Food and Agriculture 

Organization/World Health 

Organization food standards program, 

and it is recognized as an international 

food safety standards-setting 

organization in trade agreements to 

which the United States is a party. EPA 

may establish a tolerance that is 

different from a Codex MRL; however, 

FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that 

EPA explain the reasons for departing 

from the Codex level. 

The Codex has not established a MRL 

for fluindapyr. 

V. Conclusion 

Therefore, tolerances are established 

for residues of fluindapyr, (3- 

(difluoromethyl)-N-(7-fluoro-1,1,3- 

trimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl)-1- 

methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide), in 

or on Soybean, forage at 15 ppm; 

Soybean, hay at 30 ppm; Soybean, hulls 

at 0.6 ppm; and Soybean, seed at 0.2 

ppm. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This action establishes tolerances 

under FFDCA section 408(d) in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 

of actions from review under Executive 

Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
88660 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 

Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993). Because this action 

has been exempted from review under 

Executive Order 12866, this action is 

not subject to Executive Order 13211, 

entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive 

Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997). This action does not 

contain any information collections 

subject to OMB approval under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require 

any special considerations under 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This action directly regulates growers, 

food processors, food handlers, and food 

retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does 

this action alter the relationships or 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities established by Congress 

in the preemption provisions of FFDCA 

section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency 

has determined that this action will not 

have a substantial direct effect on States 

or Tribal governments, on the 

relationship between the National 

Government and the States or Tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined 

that Executive Order 13132, entitled 

‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999), and Executive Order 13175, 

entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply 

to this action. In addition, this action 

does not impose any enforceable duty or 

contain any unfunded mandate as 

described under Title II of the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 

1501 et seq.). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

VII. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: October 31, 2024. 

Charles Smith, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the 

preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR 

chapter I as follows: 

PART 180—TOLERANCES AND 

EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE 

CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.716, amend table 1 to 

paragraph (a)(1) by adding in 

alphabetical order the entries ‘‘Soybean, 

forage’’, ‘‘Soybean, hay’’, ‘‘Soybean, 

hulls’’, and ‘‘Soybean, seed’’ to read as 

follows: 

§ 180.716 Fluindapyr; tolerances for 

residues. 

(a) * * * 

(1) * * * 

TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(1) 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

* * * * * 

Soybean, forage ....................... 15 

Soybean, hay ............................ 30 

Soybean, hulls .......................... 0.6 

Soybean, seed .......................... 0.2 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2024–25917 Filed 11–7–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1