alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPT 29, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-11008 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cr-00024-LGW-JEG-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JONATHON LEBRON-SANTANA,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Georgia

 ________________________

(September 29, 2010)

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Peter H. Schmidt, II, appointed counsel for Jonathon Lebron-Santana in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lebron-Santana’s conviction

and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit 32(f)


                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Savannah
Electric and Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, we, the
undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our
individual knowledge and belief, that:

     (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Savannah Electric and Power Company
          for the year ended December 31, 2004, which this statement
          accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of
          Savannah Electric and Power Company for the year ended December 31,
          2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of Savannah Electric and Power
          Company.

                                                /s/A. R. James
                                                  A. R. James
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer


                                              /s/Kirby R. Willis
                                                Kirby R. Willis
                                    Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                                 and Treasurer

Date:  February 28, 2005
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 8, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00082

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.C.,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 00544

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presid ing



### O R D E R

Appellant's motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANYS 10-QSB FOR THE TWELVE WEEK
PERIOD ENDED APRIL 6, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-06-1999
<CASH>                                              47
<SECURITIES>                                       302
<RECEIVABLES>                                       44
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        137
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   562
<PP&E>                                             593
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,178
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,471)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,175
<SALES>                                            977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   977
<CGS>                                              902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (256)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S  UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000927790
<NAME>                        Union Acceptance Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                  161,152
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           190,304
<ALLOWANCES>                            (839)
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        350,617
<PP&E>                                  4,446
<DEPRECIATION>                          (2,332)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          479,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   165,186
<BONDS>                                 221,000
<COMMON>                                58,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                              34,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            479,429
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        75,470
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           22,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        3,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      18,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         31,126
<INCOME-TAX>                            12,706  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     18,420
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            18,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                           1.39
                                        


</TABLE>
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 40 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Social Security Administration 

relating to Implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act 

of 2007. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2017 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. FLORES, Mr. 

KING of Iowa, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. 

WITTMAN, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. 

OLSON, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. POLIQUIN, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, 

Mr. MESSER, Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. JONES, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. KELLY

of Pennsylvania, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mrs. WALORSKI, Mr. MCCAUL, 

Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. ROGERS

of Alabama, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. 

BRAT, Mr. BABIN, Mr. HILL, Mr. YOHO, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. 

BARR, Mr. PALMER, Mr. HARPER, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. 

ALLEN, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. NEWHOUSE, 

Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. LONG, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. EMMER, Ms. MCSALLY, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. RENACCI, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. YOUNG

of Alaska, Mr. HUDSON, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. 

WENSTRUP, Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. 

BYRNE, Mr. COLE, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. THOMAS J. ROONEY of Florida, 

Mr. MASSIE, Mr. RATCLIFFE, Mr. BARTON, Mrs. NOEM, Mr. LATTA, Mr. 

LOUDERMILK, Mr. COLLINS of New York, Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. 

JENKINS of West Virginia, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. MARINO, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. 

LAMBORN, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. BARLETTA, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. GOHMERT, 

Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. BANKS of Indiana, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. REED, 

Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. HURD, Mr. BOST, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. 

WILLIAMS, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. POSEY, Mr. NUNES, Mr. HOLDING, Mrs. 

HARTZLER, Ms. FOXX, Mr. PITTENGER, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. GRAVES

of Georgia, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. ROTHFUS, Ms. 

CHENEY, Mr. LABRADOR, Mr. RUSSELL, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. MITCHELL, 

Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. COOK, Mrs. LOVE, Mr. SCALISE, and Mr. AMODEI) 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 40 IH 

submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Social Security Administration relating to Implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 

2007. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the So4 cial Security Administration relating to Implementation of 

5 the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (pub6 lished at 81 Fed. Reg. 91702 (December 19, 2016)), and 

7 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for February 2013

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 32

2. Cases Added to Docket 0

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket

Permabond Construction, Inc.

No. 12-0993

Remand Order on 2/11/13

-1

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 31
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 24, 2011 

t1017 

Order 

 

October 24, 2011 

143359 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143359 

 COA: 295267 

Gogebic CC: 09-000074-FC 

JOHN ANTHONY DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
5 / 3   , 2007
----------



American Consumers, Inc.
55 Hannah Way
Rossville, GA  30741



Gentlemen:

This letter agreement amends and clarifies certain terms in the two Business
Loan Agreements and related Promissory Notes being executed of even date
herewith concerning that certain credit facility, not to exceed $980,000, being
provided by Gateway Bank & Trust (the "Lender") to American Consumers, Inc.
doing business as Shop Rite (the "Borrower"), consisting of:

     A)     The Business Loan Agreement for a term loan in the amount of
            $180,000.00 (the "Term Loan Agreement"); and

     B)     The Business Loan Agreement for a revolving line of credit in the
            maximum amount of $800,000.00 (the "Revolver Loan Agreement" and,
            together with the Term Loan Agreement, the "Loan Agreements").

Each of the Term Loan Agreement and the Revolver Loan Agreement are hereby
modified as follows:

1.   The paragraph entitled "Other Agreements" on page 2 of each of the Loan
     Agreements is hereby modified to read as follows:

     OTHER AGREEMENTS. Comply with all terms and conditions of all other
     agreements, whether now or hereafter existing, between Borrower and any
     other party and notify Lender immediately in writing of any default in
     connection with any other such agreement; provided, however, that this
     paragraph shall only apply to any such noncompliance or default that would
     materially, adversely affect Borrower's financial condition or properties.

2.   The paragraph entitled "Adverse Change" on page 3 of each of the Loan
     Agreements is hereby modified to read as follows:

     ADVERSE CHANGE. A material adverse change occurs in Borrower's financial
     condition.


                                       1
<PAGE>

Additionally, the first sentence of the paragraph entitled "Variable Interest
Rate" on the face of the Promissory Notes related to each of the Loan Agreements
is hereby modified to read as follows:

          The interest rate on this Note is subject to change from time to time
          based on changes in an independent index which is the Wall Street
          Journal Prime Rate (the "Index").


By execution of this Letter Agreement below, each of the parties hereby agrees
to and accepts the modifications to the terms of each of the Loan Agreements and
their related Promissory Notes set forth herein, as of this 3rd day of May,
2007.


GATEWAY BANK & TRUST                AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.


By:     /s/ Shawn Rogers            By:     /s/ Michael A. Richardson
        ------------------                  ---------------------------

Name:   Shawn Rogers                Name:   Michael A. Richardson
        ------------------                  ---------------------------

Title:  Sr. Vice President          Title:   President
        ------------------                  --------------------------


                                       2
Brian Jlerioux. Chainnan Dee Dec Anderson Skradsk1, V-Chmr Ann Jousma-;M!Il,er, Ptl1rickJohu:mu, AirptBn:L Will Cam<', Airpl Brtt August 18, 2014 Kevin Schlemmer Office ofAviation Analysis 

### US DepartmentofTransportation 

### 1200 New Ave SE Washington, D.C. 

### 20590 Dear Mr. Schlemmer: thnid Moyle.Cty 13rd Rep

'' . "·'

The Delta.County Airport Board and the Delta County Board of Commissioners have reviewed the bid offersfor Essential Air Service to the Delta County Airport and has decided to the bid from SkywestAirlines. Consistency and continuity have been major considerations in this decision as passenger boardings been with service Delta partners provided and frequentflyer loyalty has established. Skywest Airlines proposal offersthe same service we are currently receiving and with the code share package with Delta Airlines, we are certain that our community will have the great customerservice, on time performance creating global business and economic opportunities. frequency ;:fnd our current bank oftirneschedules will ensure our enplanement numbers will and allow our customers the best availability and accessibility to Detroit's networkofworld connections. The Airport Board the Delta County BoardofCommissioners is pleased to see the effort Skywest Airlines is makingtosupport our community and airport and supports their bid as the best option for our loyal passengers. Thank you foryour consideration in this matter. Sincerely,

Delta County Board ofCommissioners ian Herioux, Chairman Delta County Airport Board
EDGAR HTML



      

      

         


      



      Exhibit 4.3
      


      Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
      


      We have issued our report dated October 6, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 490 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-239865) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”. 


      


      
         	

                  


               	

                  /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 


               


      


      Chicago, Illinois 


      October 6, 2020
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26356]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 31, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 596 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-236, K2025-234.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26356 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
NO. 07-10-0185-CR 

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

 AT AMARILLO 

 PANEL B 

 FEBRUARY 18, 2011 

 ______________________________ 

 OMAR GUERRERO A.K.A. JUAN 

GUERRERO A.K.A. SALVADOR GUERRERO, 

 Appellant 

 v. 

 THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

 Appellee 

_______________________________ 

 FROM THE 108th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; 

 NO. 59,732-E; HON. DOUGLAS R. WOODBURN, PRESIDING 

 _______________________________ 

 

On Motion to Dismiss

 _______________________________ 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Appellant Omar Guerrero, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his 

appeal, signed by appellant, because he no longer desires to prosecute it. Without passing on 

the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, 

no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

Do not publish. Per Curiam
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6297

FRANK BOSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus DEBIE BENJAMIN, property control officer; JOHN DOE, deputy warden, sued in his individual capacity; JANE DOE, head property control officer, sued in her individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenwood. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-01-151-2-23) Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 8, 2002 Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank Boston, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Frank Boston appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. Appellant’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation in a timely manner. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file timely objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED