alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Polymer Group, Inc.'s form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            APR-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                          4,588
<SECURITIES>                                   16,967
<RECEIVABLES>                                 152,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                    9,474
<INVENTORY>                                   112,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              317,142
<PP&E>                                      1,052,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                210,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,455,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         149,128
<BONDS>                                       586,433
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          320
<OTHER-SE>                                    233,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,455,903
<SALES>                                       223,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              223,801
<CGS>                                         172,950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 172,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             22,441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,046
<INCOME-TAX>                                      367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               679
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   741
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,420
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.04


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2351]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          HONORING DYLAN RENO

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. SAM GRAVES

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                       Tuesday, December 9, 2008

  Mr. GRAVES. Madam Speaker, I proudly pause to recognize Dylan Reno, a 
very special young man who has exemplified the finest qualities of 
citizenship and leadership by taking an active part in the Boy Scouts 
of America, Troop 87, and by earning the most prestigious award of 
Eagle Scout.
  Dylan has been very active with his troop, participating in many 
Scout activities. Dylan has shown an extraordinary commitment to 
scouting as evidenced by earning 41 merit badges and holding several 
leadership positions in the troop. In July of 2005, Dylan earned the 
World Conservation Award.
  Dylan's Eagle Scout service project consisted of constructing several 
bird feeders and landscaping around the ``sitting room'' of the 
Missouri Veterans Home in Cameron, Missouri. This project continued the 
tradition of community service established by the Boy Scouts of 
America.
  Madam Speaker, I proudly ask you to join me in commending Dylan Reno 
for his accomplishments with the Boy Scouts of America and for his 
efforts put forth in achieving the highest distinction of Eagle Scout.
```
EXHIBIT 99


      Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer
                       pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that
the accompanying Form 10-QSB of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Bancorp.


By: /s/ Mary B. Halsey                                    May 13, 2003
   -------------------------------------------------------------------
Mary B. Halsey                                                    Date
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal
 Financial Officer)




                                    Page 20
STATE OF LOUISIANA 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

DIGITECH COMPUTER, INC. 

VERSUS 

CITY OF BATON ROUGE AND 

PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE 

NO. 2023 CW 0030 

JANUARY 20, 2023 

In Re: City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District 

Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 657701. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WOLFE AND MILLER, JJ. 

STAY DENIED; WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT 

FOR THE COURT 

JMG 

EW 

SMM
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26558]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 15, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
430 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-271, K2025-269.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26558 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2301]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               HONORING LINDA RAWLS OF SONOMA, CALIFORNIA

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MIKE THOMPSON

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Madam Speaker, I rise today along with my 
colleague, Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey, to honor and acknowledge Linda 
Rawls, who has been named the 2008 Sonoma Treasure Artist of the Year, 
or simply the Sonoma Treasure, by the city of Sonoma. Each year the 
city's Cultural and Fine Arts Commission selects one of the hundreds of 
artists living and working in the Sonoma Valley to receive this honor. 
Ms. Rawls was singled out for her decade's long work in costume design.
  By one account, she has fitted and costumed the stars and extras of 
more than 132 productions, including those of the Sonoma City Opera, 
the Sonoma Ballet Conservatory, school plays at Sonoma Valley High and 
each of the grade schools, Vintage House Senior Center, churches and 
Hootchie Doo Productions, a community theatre group. Her talents have 
led her to create designs for productions in neighboring counties, 
including 42nd Street Moon productions in San Francisco.
  According to Ms. Rawls, ``Costumes have to do everything. A show can 
have no scenery, but with a woman's dress or a man's hat, you can 
decipher the time and place in an instant.'' She calls costumes the 
``elemental scenery of a play, telling more about character and context 
than anything else on stage.''
  Ms. Rawls stumbled into her artistic calling 26 years ago when the 
costume designer for a school opera in which her 8-year-old son was 
performing unexpectedly quit. She volunteered to step in and has been 
following her passion ever since.
  Her peers have acknowledged Ms. Rawls work by awarding her the Best 
First Day Costume Award from the International Gilbert and Sullivan 
Festival in Buxton, England, in 1996 and the Dean Goodman Choice Award 
for Outstanding Achievement in Theatre for Costume Design in 2003.
  Madam Speaker, Linda Rawls is a true artist in every sense of the 
word and it is appropriate that we honor her today as the 2008 Sonoma 
Treasure Artist of the Year.

                          ____________________
```
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for October 2016



1.
Cases Pending Beginning of Month 
29




2.
Cases Added to Docket 



0

3.
Cases Subtracted From Docket

United Contractors Midwest, Inc. d/b/a R.A. Cullinan & Sons
No. 10-2096
Decision on October 28, 2016


-1
4.
Total Cases Pending End of Month
28
Exhibit 32
**Certifications**
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June30, 2004 of First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of,Jay S. Wintrob, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and N. Scott Gillis,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.                                                      /s/  JAY S. WINTROB   Jay S. Wintrob   Chief Executive Officer                                                         /s/  N. SCOTT GILLIS   N. Scott Gillis   Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer   
Date: August 13, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael Coppins, state and attest that:



|1. | I am the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Main Place Funding, LLC (the Registrant).
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
(the Report) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant for the periods presented.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael Coppins                       
|Michael Coppins                           
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|May 16, 2005
#### Clements & Co. *v.*Eason & Wright.

This was an action of covenant, brought upon an instrument executed by two, and appearing to be under seal, but not attested by any subscribing witness. There was no witness to the execution, but proof was offered by *24tjie Plaintiff, of an aeknowledgment by one of the co> venantors that the instrument was executed by both : which Judge Spencer would not admit, and no other evidence being; offered, the. Plaintiff was ordered to be nonsuited; the Court saying, he ought to have brought his action on the case, an ! proof that the instrument was acknowledged, is no proof of the sealing, and will not make it to be a deed.

Note — The case of *Ingham*v. *Hall,*overrules the objection that case, and not covenant or debt, is the proper action upon an unattested sealed instrument. *Post*193. The other objection would now be equally untenable, it is a rule well established, that the subscribing witness to a deed or other sealed instrument, must be produced to prove its execution. *Ormichund*v. Barker, 1 Atkins, 49. *Abbot*v. *Plumbe.*1 *Dong. 216.*This rule is never departed from, except the witness is dead, not to be found after diligent enquiry, removed bevond the process of the Court, become infamous, or interested by operation of law. *Adam and Wife*v. *Kers,*1 *Bos. Pul.*360. *Cogian*v Williamson, 1 *Doug.*93. *Prince*v. Blackburn, 2 *East.*250. *Jones v. Mason. 2 Strange*833 *Cunliffe*v. *Sefton,*2 *East.*183. *Nelius V. Brickell’s adm’r. post*19. *Jones*v *Brinkley, post*20 *Johnston*v. Knight, 1. *Murph.*293. *Selby*v. Clark, 4 *Hawks,*265. Nearly all the cases concur, under these circumstances, in requiring proof of the witness’s hand writing, and from the case of *Milward v. Temple,*1 *Camp. N.P.Rep. 375,*it would seem that the proof of his hand-writing would be sufficient, without proving the hand-writing of the obligor. In the State of N. York, it has been exoressly so adjudged. *Mott v. Doughty,*1 *John. Ca.*230. *Sluby*v. *Champlin,*4 *John.*61. Where there is a subscribing witness, it has been expressly decided, that the acknowledgment uf the obligor is not sufficient proof of the execution of the bond. *Abbot v. Plumbe*and *Cunliffe*v. Sefton, cited above. *Call*v. *Dunning, 4 East.*53. *Johnston*v. *Knight,*2 *Murph. 237.*Where the. subscribing witness is dead, and his hand-writing cannot be proved, proof of the obligor’s hand-writing will be admitted. *Jones’ adm’rs. v. Blount’s ex’rs.*1 *Hay.*238. f there be no subscribing witness, or if the name of .ill. subscribing witness can be shown to be in the handwriting of the obligor, or if the subscribing witness, upon being-called, cannot prove the execution of the bo id, other evidence may be received, as of the obligor’s band-writing or his acknowledgment of the instrument. *Ingham v. Hall,*cited above. *Allen*v. Martin, 1 *Car. Law Repos*93. *Holloway*v. *Lawrence,*1 *Hawks,*49. Where a subscribing witness leaves the State in t ir exercise of a public duty, (as m the case of a member of Congress) bis hand-writing may bo prov-d. *Selby v. Clark, 4 Hawks, 265. See also 1 Philips on Evidence,*419, 420. (3 Am. Ed.)
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41867

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DENNIS LEE PARKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 738

Filed: September 25, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of five years, for felony driving under the influence and 

being a persistent violator, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Dennis Lee Parker pled guilty to felony driving under the influence, I.C. §§ 18-8004 and 

18-8005(9), and being a persistent violator, I.C. § 19-2514. In exchange for his guilty pleas, 

additional charges were dismissed. The district court sentenced Parker to a unified term of 

fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years. Parker also filed an I.C.R. 35 

motion for reduction of his sentence, which the district court denied. Parker appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Parker’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Allied Security Innovations Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Michael
J. Pellegrino, Senior Vice President & CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





By:
                  /s/
      Michael J. PellegrinoMichael
      J. PellegrinoSenior
      Vice President & CFOMay
      13, 2009
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09621

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 09621\09621_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09621\09621_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09621\09621_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09621\09621_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09621\09621_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09621\Certification Statement Plant ID 09621.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09621\Follow up\List of Questions for epa information request.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09621\Follow up\Part C MK 2010.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09621\Follow up\Part D mk 2010 (2).xlsm Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09621\Supplemental Documents\09621_ENVR ASSES PT2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09621\Supplemental Documents\09621_ENVR ASSESS PT1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09621\Supplemental Documents\09621_Visio-Muskogee aerial for epa.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09621\Supplemental Documents\09621_Visio-POND-1 drawing.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09621\Supplemental Documents\09621_Visio-POND-2 drawing.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09621\Supplemental Documents\09621_WB-1 9621 Muskogee water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09621\09621_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09621\09621_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2911

___________________________

Hollis Shannon Winfrey

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Ford Motor Company

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

 ____________

 Submitted: March 24, 2021

Filed: March 29, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Hollis Winfrey appeals following the district court’s1

 denial of his motion

seeking reconsideration of the judgment dismissing this employment discrimination

action. For the following reasons, we affirm.

In November 2019, Winfrey filed his pro se complaint, naming his former

employer, Ford Motor Company. The district court thereafter granted Ford’s motion

to dismiss the complaint, concluding, inter alia, that some of Winfrey’s claims were

untimely, while others failed to state a claim. Judgment was entered on April 1, 2020. 

In July, Winfrey moved for “reconsideration,” asserting, for various reasons, that he

was unable to timely raise his claims. On August 20, the district court entered an

order denying the motion, concluding that Winfrey’s arguments did not merit relief

under, as relevant, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) (court may relieve party

from final judgment or order due to, inter alia, mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or

excusable neglect). On September 11, Winfrey filed his notice of appeal (NOA). On

appeal, he challenges the district court’s dismissal of his complaint, and asserts that

he was entitled to relief under Rule 60(b).

Initially, we conclude that appellate jurisdiction is limited to the district court’s

order denying Winfrey’s motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b), as that is the

only order which he timely appealed. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (NOA must be filed

within 30 days after entry of judgment or order appealed from; if party filed, inter

alia, motion under Rule 60 no later than 28 days after entry of judgment, time to file

appeal runs from entry of order disposing of such motion); see also United States v.

Stute Co., 402 F.3d 820, 822 (8th Cir. 2005) (timely filing of NOA is mandatory and

jurisdictional). We further conclude, after careful review of the record and the

parties’ arguments on appeal, that the district court did not abuse its discretion in 

1The Honorable Greg Kays, United Stated District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

-2-
denying relief under Rule 60(b). See Giles v. Saint Luke’s Northland-Smithville, 908

F.3d 365, 368 (8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam) (standard of review; reversal of denial of

Rule 60(b) motion is rare, as it only authorizes relief in exceptional circumstances).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-3-