alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
[LEGEND]
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of Form 10-K dated December 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
[/LEGEND]
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             104
<SECURITIES>                                        67
<RECEIVABLES>                                      144
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2
<INVENTORY>                                         51
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   389
<PP&E>                                             480
<DEPRECIATION>                                     119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              118
<BONDS>                                            923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,576
<SALES>                                            233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   585
<CGS>                                              117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    173
<INCOME-TAX>                                        61
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       112
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Pages S137-S138]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      By Mr. McCAIN (for himself and Mr. Kyl):
  S. 152. A bill to direct the Secretary of the Interior and the 
Secretary of Agriculture to jointly conduct a study of certain land 
adjacent to the Walnut Canyon National Monument in the State of 
Arizona; to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
  Mr. McCAIN. Mr. President, I am pleased to be joined by Senator Kyl 
in reintroducing legislation to authorize a special resources and land 
management study for lands adjacent to the Walnut Canyon National 
Monument in Arizona. The study is intended to evaluate a range of 
management options for public lands adjacent to the monument to ensure 
adequate protection of the canyon's cultural and natural resources. A 
similar bill was introduced last Congress and received a hearing in the 
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee's Subcommittee on 
National Parks. The bill being introduced today reflects suggested 
changes of that Subcommittee and includes language that met their 
approval. I am grateful for the input of the members of the 
Subcommittee and their staff.
  For several years, local communities adjacent to the Walnut Canyon 
National Monument have debated whether the land surrounding the 
monument would be best protected from future development under 
management of the U.S. Forest Service or the National Park Service. The 
Coconino County Board and the Flagstaff City Council have passed 
resolutions concluding that the preferred method to determine what is 
best for the land surrounding Walnut Canyon National Monument is by 
having a Federal study conducted. The recommendations from such a study 
would help to resolve the question of future management and whether 
expanding the monument's boundaries could compliment current public and 
multiple-use needs.
  The legislation also would direct the Secretary of the Interior and 
the Secretary of Agriculture to provide recommendations for management 
options for maintenance of the public uses and protection of resources 
of the study area. I fully expect that as this measure continues 
through the legislative process, Congress will ensure that funding 
offsets are provided to it and every other spending measure as we work 
to restore fiscal discipline to Washington in a bi-partisan manner.
  This legislation would provide a mechanism for determining the 
management options for one of Arizona's high uses scenic areas and 
protect the natural and cultural resources of this incredibly beautiful 
monument. I urge my colleagues to support its passage.

[[Page S138]]

                                 ______
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9
<MULTIPLIER>            1

<PERIOD-TYPE>           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>            DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                  11,550,133
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        17,870,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            143,473,608
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                 143,473,608
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                   143,473,608
<LOANS>                                271,449,833
<ALLOWANCE>                              3,563,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         461,632,426
<DEPOSITS>                             319,810,818
<SHORT-TERM>                           104,096,043
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                      6,365,190
<LONG-TERM>                                937,681
<COMMON>                                 7,824,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              22,598,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>         461,632,426
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         22,500,530
<INTEREST-INVEST>                        6,967,295
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           417,703
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        29,885,528
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      10,930,962
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      13,802,110
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   16,083,418
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (922)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         12,707,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          5,768,345
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>               3,665,978
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             3,665,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 2.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 2.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                0430
<LOANS-NON>                                547,000
<LOANS-PAST>                               744,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           672,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                         3,853,633
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              427,602
<RECOVERIES>                               137,743
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                        3,563,774
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0


</TABLE>
#### DEN ex DEM. of ZACHARIAH CANDLER *v.*ELI LUNSFORD, et al.

As patenta or grants from the state are recorded in the office of the Secretary of State, copies of of them obtained from that office, may be given in evidence without accounting for the originals, by all persons except the patentees or grantees themselves, or those claiming under them who would be entitled to the possession of the? originals.

Ejectment for two tracts of land, tried at Buncombe on the last circuit before his Honor Judge Dick.

After the lessor of the plaintiff had made out his case by showing a grant from the state for the lands in dispute dated the 10th of January, 1829, and that the defendants Were in possession of the said lands, the defendants offered in evidence a copy of.a grant from the state to one John *G.*Blount of older date than the one to the lessor of the plaintiff, and covering the whole of one of the tracts claimed by the lessor of the plaintiff, and also a large body of land not claimed either by the plaintiff’s lessor or the defendants. An affidavit was also offered by the defendants, in which it was stated that they did not know where the original grant to Blount was, without stating that they had made any inquiry for it. Upon this, and because it appeared further to the Court that the Blount grant covered a large portion of Buncombe, and one or two of the adjoining counties, and that it was a matter of notoriety in the county of Buncombe that the said grant was, and for a number of years had been in the possession of Colonel Love, of Haywood County, the Court rejected the copy as evidence. The lessor of the *19plaintiff had a verdict and judgment, and the defendants appealed.

Dec. 1838.

No counsel appeared for either party in this Court.

Ruffin, Chief Justice.

The principle on which the Court rejected the copy of the grant offered in evidence by the defendants, applies to papers between private persons. The rule is different as to patents or grants from the sovereign. They • are enrolled in the office from which they emanate, and are there records. Like all other records, they may be used as evidence by all persons, by obtaining copies, except -the patentee or those claiming under him, who would be entitled to the possession of the original. Such was the rule at the common law, inasmuch as the grant is of record. This principle is recognized by a- statute of 1748, (Rev. ch. 44, sec. 6,) which not only makes the “ record of every grant in the Secretary’s office evidence, but goes further and makes the abstracts entered in theoffice of Lord Granville, or (generally) exemplificaffi^^^^^mu'duly proved, evidence, as if the orignals

The judgment appeale -ire be reversed and a *venire de novo*awa:

Per Curiam. tot reversed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23b
                                                                     -----------

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-51969) and on the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(File Nos. 33-58951, 33-53499, 33-53487, 33-52420, 33-8658 and 2-99919,
333-51739, 333-68369 and 333-80913) and the related Prospectuses of Allen
Telecom Inc. of our report dated February 16, 1999, except as to paragraph five
of Note 9 as originally presented in the financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 1998, which is as of March 1, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Allen
Telecom Inc. which appears under Item 14 on page 17. We also consent to the
references to our firm in the above-mentioned Prospectuses under the caption
"EXPERTS".

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 28, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         191,772
<SECURITIES>                                   210,671
<RECEIVABLES>                                  509,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                   10,185
<INVENTORY>                                    128,755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,116,409
<PP&E>                                         950,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                 705,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,596,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          877,118
<BONDS>                                        12
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,088
<OTHER-SE>                                     607,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,596,404
<SALES>                                        538,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,631,549
<CGS>                                          559,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,374,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               589,009
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (313,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   13,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (326,682)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (326,682)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.71)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,239-01

EX PARTE EYNEL GUZMAN, Relator

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NOS. 219-81005-08 & 219-81460-08 

IN THE 219TH DISTRICT COURT FROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed applications for writs of habeas corpus in

the 219th District Court of Collin Countychallenging cause numbers 219-81005-08 and 219-81460-

08. The trial court entered orders designating issues in both causes on August 20, 2012. These

applications have yet been forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the Judge of the 219th District Court of Collin County, shall file a response with

this Court by having the District Clerk submit the records on such habeas corpus applications. In

the alternative, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the orders designating issues and then
2

have the District Clerk submit the records on such applications. In either case, Respondent’s answer

shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ

of mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted a response.

Filed: November 5, 2014

Do not publish
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S31]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MEASURES READ THE FIRST TIME

  The following bills were read the first time:

       S. 1. A bill to create jobs, restore economic growth, and 
     strengthen America's middle class through measures that 
     modernize the nation's infrastructure, enhance America's 
     energy independence, expand educational opportunities, 
     preserve and improve affordable health care , provide tax 
     relief, and protect those in greatest need, and for other 
     purposes.
       S. 2. A bill to improve the lives of middle class families 
     and provide them with greater opportunity to achieve the 
     American dream.
       S. 3. A bill to protect homeowners and consumers by 
     reducing foreclosures, ensuring the availability of credit 
     for homeowners, businesses, and consumers, and reforming the 
     financial regulatory system, and for other purposes.
       S. 4. A bill to guarantee affordable, quality health 
     coverage for all Americans, and for other purposes.
       S. 5. A bill to improve the economy and security of the 
     United States by reducing the dependence of the United States 
     on foreign and unsustainable energy sources and the risks of 
     global warming, and for other purposes.
       S. 6. A bill to restore and enhance the national security 
     of the United States.
       S. 7. A bill to expand educational opportunities for all 
     Americans by increasing access to high-quality early 
     childhood education and after school programs, advancing 
     reform in elementary and secondary education, strengthening 
     mathematics and science instruction, and ensuring that higher 
     education is more affordable, and for other purposes.
       S. 8. A bill to return the Government to the people by 
     reviewing controversial ``midnight regulations'' issued in 
     the waning days of the Bush Administration.
       S. 9. A bill to strengthen the United States economy, 
     provide for more effective border and employment enforcement, 
     and for other purposes.
       S. 10. A bill to restore fiscal discipline and begin to 
     address the long-term fiscal challenges facing the United 
     States, and for other purposes.
       S. 33. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
     with respect to the proper tax treatment of certain 
     indebtedness discharged in 2009 or 2010, and for other 
     purposes.
       S. 34. A bill to prevent the Federal Communications 
     Commission from repromulgating the fairness doctrine.

                          ____________________
```
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on October 31, 2019 

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 14-1688

Science Applications 

International Corp., 

d/b/a SAIC

06/23/16 DFR 10/31/16 Closed

2 15-1121 Clean Fuels of 

Indiana, Inc. 06/30/16 DFR 11/09/16 Closed

3 14-1268 Dover High 

Performance Plastics 07/19/16 DFR 11/01/16 Closed

4 15-1347 Gate Precast Co. 11/10/16 DFR 12/05/16 Closed

 5 16-1533

Cooper/T. Smith 

Corporation, d/b/a 

Blakeley Boatworks, 

Inc.

04/27/17 DFR 04/27/17 Closed

 6 16-0803

The Lane 

Construction 

Corporation

05/23/17 DFR 09/14/17 Closed

 7 16-1167 Aerospace Testing 

Alliance 08/22/17 DFR 11/20/17 Closed

 8 15-1069 Healy Tibbitts 

Builders, Inc. 10/27/17 DFR 11/13/17 Closed

 9 16-0940 Angel Brothers 

Enterprises, Ltd. 11/17/17 DFR 12/15/17 Closed

10 17-0190 Shelly & Sands, Inc. 05/02/18 DFR 05/10/18 Closed

11 15-1574

MasTec North 

America dba MasTec 

Advanced 

Technologies, Inc.

06/20/18 DFR 07/10/18 Closed

12 17-0949 Walmart, Inc. 07/12/18 DFR 08/09/18 Closed

13 16-1587 TNT Crane & Rigging, 

Inc. 10/16/18 DFR 10/30/18 Closed

14 17-1214 Mansfield Industrial, 

Inc. 11/23/18 DFR 01/03/19 Closed

15 17-0483 Ceco Concrete 

Construction, LLC 11/28/18 DFR 12/19/18 Closed

16 16-1628 Schaad Detective 

Agency, Inc. 12/18/18 DFR 01/07/19 Closed

17 17-1174 Wayne Farms, LLC 03/01/19 DFR 03/21/19 Closed

18 17-2144 Tampa Electric Co. 04/09/19 DFR 04/23/19 Closed

19 19-0142

Steven S. Moalemi, 

M.D., P.C., d/b/a 

Empire Physical 

Medicine and Pain 

Management

09/26/19 DFR

20 18-0034

Armstrong Utilities, 

Inc. d/b/a Armstrong 

Cable Services

10/15/19 DFR 10/24/19 Open
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on October 31, 2019 

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

21 17-0138 Home Rubber 

Company, LP 10/22/19 DFR

22 18-0970 FreightCar America, 

Inc. 10/28/19 DFR

23 18-0758 RoadSafe Traffic 

Systems, Inc. 10/30/19 DFR

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
# Official Journal L 109/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 109 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5828 April 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 109

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5828 April 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2015/657 of 5 February 2013 on State aid granted by Germany and Austria to Bayerische Landesbank (Case SA.28487 (C 16/09, ex N 254/09))
  (notified under document C(2013) 507)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2015/658 of 8 October 2014 on the aid measure SA.34947 (2013/C) (ex 2013/N) which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for support to the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station
  (notified under document C(2014) 7142)

   (
  1
  ) | 44 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/657 of 5 February 2013 on State aid granted by Germany and Austria to Bayerische Landesbank (Case SA.28487 (C 16/09, ex N 254/09))
  (notified under document C(2013) 507)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2013) 507)

1

1

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/658 of 8 October 2014 on the aid measure SA.34947 (2013/C) (ex 2013/N) which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for support to the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station
  (notified under document C(2014) 7142)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2014) 7142)

1

44

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3818 — Gilde/DSM Bakery Ingredients)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 114/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----