alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 308/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 308 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6631 August 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 308

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6631 August 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2023/C 308/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) – amending budget No 1 | 1 |
| 2023/C 308/02 | Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Banking Authority (EBA) – amending budget No 1 | 9 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2023/C 308/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) – amending budget No 1

1

2023/C 308/02

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Banking Authority (EBA) – amending budget No 1

9

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Union Agency for Railways ( OJ C 38, 31.1.2023 ) | 14 |
| | Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) – amending budget No 1 ( OJ C 191, 31.5.2023 ) | 15 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Union Agency for Railways ( OJ C 38, 31.1.2023 )

( OJ C 38, 31.1.2023 )

14

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) – amending budget No 1 ( OJ C 191, 31.5.2023 )

( OJ C 191, 31.5.2023 )

15

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on November 30, 2019
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
14-1688
Science Applications International Corp., d/b/a SAIC
06/23/16
DFR
10/31/16
Closed

2
15-1121
Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.
06/30/16
DFR
11/09/16
Closed

3
14-1268
Dover High Performance Plastics
07/19/16
DFR
11/01/16
Closed

4
15-1347
Gate Precast Co.
11/10/16
DFR 
12/05/16
Closed

 5
 16-1533
Cooper/T. Smith Corporation, d/b/a Blakeley Boatworks, Inc.
 04/27/17
DFR
04/27/17
Closed




 6
16-0803
The Lane Construction Corporation 
05/23/17
DFR
09/14/17
Closed

 7
16-1167
Aerospace Testing Alliance
08/22/17
DFR
11/20/17
Closed

 8
15-1069
Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc.
10/27/17
DFR
11/13/17
   Closed

 9
16-0940
Angel Brothers Enterprises, Ltd.
11/17/17
DFR
12/15/17
Closed

10
17-0190
Shelly & Sands, Inc.
05/02/18
DFR
05/10/18
Closed

11
15-1574
MasTec North America dba MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.
06/20/18
DFR
07/10/18
Closed

12
17-0949
Walmart, Inc.
07/12/18
DFR
08/09/18
   Closed

13
16-1587
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc.
10/16/18
DFR
10/30/18
Closed

14
17-1214
Mansfield Industrial, Inc.
11/23/18
DFR
01/03/19
Closed

15
17-0483
Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
11/28/18
DFR
12/19/18
Closed

16
16-1628
Schaad Detective Agency, Inc.
12/18/18
DFR
01/07/19
Closed

17
17-1174
Wayne Farms, LLC
03/01/19
DFR
03/21/19
Closed

18
17-2144
Tampa Electric Co.
04/09/19
DFR
04/23/19
Closed

19
19-0142
Steven S. Moalemi, M.D., P.C., d/b/a Empire Physical Medicine and Pain Management
09/26/19
DFR



20
18-0034
Armstrong Utilities, Inc. d/b/a Armstrong Cable Services
10/15/19
DFR
10/24/19
Open

21
17-0138
Home Rubber Company, LP
10/22/19
DFR
   11/04/19
Open

22
18-0970
FreightCar America, Inc.
10/28/19
DFR
11/04/19
Open

23
18-0758
RoadSafe Traffic Systems, Inc.
10/30/19
DFR
11/01/19
Open

24
09-0901
Seward Ship’s Drydock, Inc.
11/04/19
REM



 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

 Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant, 

v. OSHRC Docket No. 08-1389 

PIKE ELECTRIC, INC., 

Respondent. 

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING NOTICE 

The Commission hereby supplements its May 6, 2010 Briefing Notice to request that the 

parties brief the following additional issues: 

(1) Did the judge err in finding the Secretary established that Respondent had knowledge 

of the cited condition? 

(2) Did the judge err in finding that Respondent failed to establish its affirmative defense 

of unpreventable employee misconduct? 

(3) In addressing these questions, the parties are asked to discuss L.R. Willson and Sons 

Inc., 18 BNA OSHC 1698, 1698-99 (No. 94-1546, 1999), on remand from 134 F.3d 

1235 (4th Cir. 1998), rev’g in pertinent part 17 BNA OSHC 2059, 2063-64 (1997). 

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

 Within 40 days of this supplemental notice, the Secretary shall file a Supplemental Brief. 

Until that time, Respondent’s time for filing its Brief is tolled. Once the Secretary files her 

Supplemental Brief, Respondent shall have 30 days to file its Brief. Otherwise, all briefs are to 

be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1

 A party who does not intend to file a brief 

must notify the Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefore within the applicable 

 

1

 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate. 
2

time for filing briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or 

similar notices of intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

 

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: July 1, 2010 /s/ 

 Ray H. Darling, Jr. 

 Executive Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 36 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public

              

 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 17, 2017, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 25, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      382
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,352
<PP&E>                                         234,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,858
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,756
<BONDS>                                        148,432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,448
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,265
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,955)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,955)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (20.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (20.00)


</TABLE>
Table 7
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2015

JACK MASSENGALE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JULIEN A. GRAYSTONE; JOHN DOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CA-98-472-A)

Submitted: February 23, 1999 Decided: March 22, 1999

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jack Massengale, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Darrin Hummel, Washington,

D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jack Massengale appeals a district court order granting Julien

Graystone’s motion to dismiss and dismissing with prejudice his

amended complaint alleging slander and libel, invasion of privacy,

theft of intellectual property, harassment, false light, conversion

and breach of confidentiality, and intentional interference with

advantageous business relations and contractual relations. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Massengale v. Graystone, No. CA-98-472-A (E.D.

Va. July 6, 1998). Because this was a judgment on the merits, the

district court properly dismissed the case with prejudice. See

Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc. v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 399 n.3

(1981) (noting that the dismissal for failure to state a claim

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is a “judgment on the merits.”).

We affirm the order of the district court but deny Graystone’s

motion to dismiss this appeal and deny his motion for sanctions.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 430 

Supporting the designation of April 20, 2016, as ‘‘Cheyenne Mountain Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2016 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of April 20, 2016, as ‘‘Cheyenne 

Mountain Day’’. 

Whereas, since 1966, Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station 

(in this preamble referred to as ‘‘Cheyenne Mountain’’) 

in Colorado Springs, Colorado, has been a synergistic hub 

for tracking security threats worldwide, serving as an essential component to the defense of North America and 

to global security; 

Whereas countless space and ground sensor data collections 

are synthesized at Cheyenne Mountain, providing vital information for the key threat assessments needed to ensure the safety and security of millions of people throughout North America; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 430 ATS 

Whereas the 21st Space Wing at Peterson Air Force Base in 

Colorado Springs, Colorado, provides operational support 

and infrastructure sustainability; 

Whereas the 721st Mission Support Group at Cheyenne 

Mountain provides dedicated daily sustainment to more 

than 13 mission partners performing the national security mission inside of the Cheyenne Mountain Complex; 

Whereas, every day, more than 1,000 military and civilian 

personnel of the United States and Canada, residing in 

Colorado and working at Cheyenne Mountain, are ever 

vigilant in ensuring the collective common defense of 

North America; 

Whereas Cheyenne Mountain is— 

(1) a valuable national security asset; 

(2) seen as one of the greatest engineering marvels 

of its time; and 

(3) relevant both now and in the future; 

Whereas Colorado is proud to be a nexus of capabilities that 

provide for the defense of North America, which is critical to global security not only today but also in the future; and 

Whereas April 20, 2016, is the 50th anniversary of Cheyenne 

Mountain achieving full operational capability and would 

be an appropriate date to designate as ‘‘Cheyenne Mountain Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of April 20, 2016, 

3 as ‘‘Cheyenne Mountain Day’’; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 430 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes the strategic importance of Chey2 enne Mountain Air Force Station to the defense of 

3 North America; and 

4 (3) commends the efforts of the 21st Space 

5 Wing, the 721st Mission Support Group, and the 

6 1,000 military and civilian personnel of the United 

7 States and Canada working at the Cheyenne Moun8 tain Complex to support the collective common de9 fense of North America. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 391/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 391 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6316 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 391

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6316 November 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 391/01 | Council Decision of 10 November 2020 appointing the President of the Boards of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 391/01

Council Decision of 10 November 2020 appointing the President of the Boards of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for January 2015

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 32

2. Cases Added to Docket 

Florida Gas Contractors, Inc.

No. 14-0948

Direction for Review on 01/15/15

CSA Equipment Company, LLC

No. 12-1287

Direction for Review on 01/16/15

2

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket 0

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 34
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of AMERCO, certify
that:

     1.   the Annual Report of AMERCO on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AMERCO.




                                        /s/ EDWARD J. SHOEN
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Edward J. Shoen
                                        Chairman of the Board and President
                                        September 25, 2002
Argued and submitted April 28,

convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing June 16,

reconsideration denied August 4,

petition for review denied August 24, 1993 (317 Or 486)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*CARL GENE LEWIS, *Appellant.*

(CR91-0054, CR91-0055, CR91-0056, CR91-0057, CR91-0058, CR91-0059, CR91-0060, CR91-0061, CR91-0127; CA A73095 (Control), A73096, A73097, A73098, A73099, A73100, A73101, A73102, A73103)

(Cases Consolidated)

853 P2d 325

James N. Varner, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*200PER CURIAM

Defendant challenges the trial court’s sentence in his appeal of his convictions for four counts of unlawful taking of wildlife, ORS 498.012, four counts of unlawful sale of wildlife, ORS 498.022, and one count of failure to keep or submit fish records. ORS 508.540. All of the convictions are Class A misdemeanors. ORS 161.555(3).

The state concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing, and we accept its concession. Accordingly, we remand for resentencing.

Defendant’s other assignments of error do not require discussion.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 1, 2020

No. 04-20-00180-CR

IN RE Stephen Wayne RICHARDSON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On March 24, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on April 1, 2020.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of April, 2020.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010CR10629, styled The State of Texas v. Stephen Wayne Richardson, 

pending in the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Frank J. Castro presiding.
exv10w11






Exhibit 10.11




AMENDMENT No. 1 TO THE

BRAVO DEVELOPMENT, INC. 2006 STOCK OPTION PLAN








     Pursuant to the authority reserved to it under Section 9.1 of the Bravo Development, Inc.
Option Plan (the “Plan”), the Board of Directors of Bravo
Brio Restaurant Group, Inc. (f/k/a Bravo Development, Inc.) hereby amends the Plan, as follows:








	 	1.	 	Section 1.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end
thereof:





     “The Plan is terminated as of the date on which the Company’s Common Stock becomes Publicly
Traded and no further Awards may be issued hereunder on or after such date.”




	 	2.	 	Section 3.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end
thereof:





     “The Plan is terminated as of the date on which the Company’s Common Stock becomes Publicly
Traded and no further Awards may be issued hereunder on or after such date.”




	 	3.	 	Section 9.2 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety.






	 	4.	 	In all other respects, the Plan is affirmed.
----

(2004/C 78 E/0759)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1285/03

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(4 April 2003)

Subject:   European Union action to ensure civil and respectful treatment for prisoners of war in Iraq

Right from the outset of the war in Iraq we have seen disturbing images of the inhuman treatment to which prisoners from the Anglo-American alliance are being subjected. The conduct of the Iraqi authorities manifestly contravenes the provisions of the Geneva Convention as regards respect for prisoners of war. It may very soon be that EU citizens are prisoners of war of the Iraqi authorities too.

What action will the Commission take in this regard?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(15 May 2003)

The Commission is very concerned by the inhuman treatments of prisoners of war, in violation of the provision of the Geneva Convention, in this war as in any other conflict. In this regard, the behaviour of the Iraqi authorities interviewing publicly American prisoners, with intimidatory intent, represents a clear violation of the Geneva Convention. This behaviour is to be condemned.

The Iraqi government has been dissolved following the United States military occupation. Therefore, the risk of Union citizens becoming prisoners of the Iraqi authorities no longer exists.

----