alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 92 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas the Jewish people have had a homeland in modernday Israel for more than 3,000 years; 

Whereas on November 2, 1917, United Kingdom Foreign 

Secretary Lord Arthur Balfour wrote to Lord Walter 

Rothschild, to be declared to the Zionist Federation, a 

letter declaring, on behalf of the Government of 
2 

•HCON 92 EH 

the United Kingdom, support for a home for the Jewish 

people in the former Ottoman district of Palestine; 

Whereas this letter, known as the Balfour Declaration, was 

ratified by the League of Nations on July 24, 1922; 

Whereas on September 21, 1922, President Warren G. Harding signed House Joint Resolution 322, after unanimous 

support from the House of Representatives and the Senate, favoring the establishment, in the former Ottoman 

district of Palestine, of a national home for the Jewish 

people; 

Whereas the Balfour Declaration clearly recognized and 

sought to uphold the ‘‘civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,’’ as well as 

the ‘‘rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any 

other country’’; 

Whereas the Balfour Declaration was a significant part of 

the chain of events that led to the establishment of the 

modern State of Israel on May 14, 1948; 

Whereas since Israel’s founding, it has been a strong and 

steadfast ally to the United States, and the relationship 

is built on a mutual commitment to shared values; 

Whereas Israel serves as a beacon for democracy by holding 

free and transparent elections and promoting the free exchange of ideas; 

Whereas in April 1998, the United States designated Israel 

as a Major Non-NATO ally and in 2014 was elevated to 

the status of a Major Strategic Partner; and 

Whereas the 100th Anniversary of the Balfour Declaration 

offers an opportunity for recommitment to strengthening 

the relationship between the United States and Israel: 

Now, therefore, be it 
3 

•HCON 92 EH 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) affirms its commitment to maintaining the 

4 strongest of bilateral ties with the State of Israel; 

5 (2) recognizes the importance of the establish6 ment of the modern State of Israel as a secure and 

7 democratic homeland for the Jewish people that up8 holds full and equal rights for all of its citizens; and 

9 (3) supports efforts to continue to increase eco10 nomic, security and cultural ties between the United 

11 States and Israel. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 92 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the deep and abiding friendship 

between the United States and Israel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN PART II, ITEM 8 OF FORM 10-K DATED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              65
<SECURITIES>                                       109
<RECEIVABLES>                                      120
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1
<INVENTORY>                                         38
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   358
<PP&E>                                             402
<DEPRECIATION>                                      91
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              105
<BONDS>                                            903
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,369
<SALES>                                            146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   464
<CGS>                                               93
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   369
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (211)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (261)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (261)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.07)


</TABLE>
D-15
D-16
D-17
D-18
D-19
D-20
D-21
D-22
D-23
Argued and submitted July 22, 1982,

appeal dismissed August 3,

reconsideration denied September 16, petition for review allowed October 25, 1983 (295 Or 840)

See 297 Or 234,683 P2d 1360 (1984)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*BRUCE NEIL CLEVENGER, *Appellant.*

(81-2006, 81-2389; CA A23835, CA A23836)

(Cases Consolidated.)

667 P2d 9

Ronald K. Cox, Assistant Public Defender, Coquille, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Daryl Dodson Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*184PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions of theft in the first degree and assault in the second degree, following pleas entered as part of a plea bargain that resulted in the dismissal of several other charges. He assigns error to the trial court’s denying his motion to withdraw his plea of no contest to the assault charge and his plea of guilty to the theft charge, contending that the factual basis for the no contest plea ceased to exist as of the time of sentencing and that the guilty plea was rendered involuntary because of certain misrepresentations made by a police officer.

This court is not authorized to consider on direct appeal defendant’s claim that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion to withdraw his pleas. ORS 138.050; *State v. Lugo,*48 Or App 919, 618 P2d 986 (1980); *State v. Slopak,*3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970). Only matters relating to the sentence may be considered unless, as a matter of law, there has been no valid guilty plea under ORS 135.380(2)1 and, therefore, no conviction. *State v. Reichert,*39 Or App 905, 593 P2d 1298 (1979). If defendant has a remedy, it is under the Post Conviction Act.

Appeal dismissed.

1

 ORS 135.380(2) provides:

> “A defendant with counsel may plead guilty or no contest on the day of arraignment or any time thereafter. A defendant without counsel shall not be allowed to plead guilty or no contest to a felony on the day of arraignment.”
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ RAÚL ALARCÓN, JR.Name:
    Raúl Alarcón, Jr.Title:
    Chairman of the Board of
Directors, President and
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                       812,610
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              6,141,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   0
<PP&E>                                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           185,740,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              0
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                89,103,366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             185,740,170
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           8,884,611
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           7,628,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              88,846
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         2,135,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (968,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (968,405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (968,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 14, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 584 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-223, K2025-221.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26331 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.4 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Thomas E. Legro, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 of Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the co-registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The co-registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
co-registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
co-registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the co-registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered in this report based on such
evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the co-registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
co-registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the co-registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the co-registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The co-registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the co-registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
co-registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the co-registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
co-registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 11, 2004 /s/ THOMAS E. LEGROThomas E. LegroVice President, Controller and Chief AccountingOfficerIndiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation
EXHIBIT 10.132
                  TUDOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ELECTION TO EXERCISE




                            TUDOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                      a British Virgin Islands Corporation
                         Tortola, British Virgin Islands
                             c/o Bart Nachamie, Esq.
                                 425 Park Avenue
                            New York, New York 10022


July 15, 1999


Play Co. Toys & Entertainment Corp.
Richard Brady, President
550 Rancheros Drive
San Marcos, California 92069

         Re:      Election of Option to Exercise

Dear Mr. Brady:

     Pursuant to an Assignment of Conversion Rights Agreement (the "Assignment")
duly  executed on September  15, 1998 by and between  Tudor  Technologies,  Inc.
("Tudor") and ABC Fund, Inc., the holder of a debenture (the "Debenture") issued
by Play Co.  Toys &  Entertainment  Corp.  ("Play  Co.") in  January  1998,  ABC
assigned all of its right,  title,  and interest in and to its right to purchase
up to an aggregate of twenty-five (25%) percent of the outstanding shares of the
common stock of a wholly-owned Play Co.  subsidiary,  Toys  International,  Inc.
("Toys"),  all as more fully set forth in a certain Letter  Agreement dated June
30, 1998 by and between ABC and Play Co. (the "Letter Agreement").

     In accordance with the aforesaid documents (the Debenture,  the Assignment,
and the  Letter  Agreement),  please be  advised  that  Tudor  hereby  elects to
exercise its option to purchase from Play Co. 25% of the issued and  outstanding
shares of Toys at an exercise  price  equivalent to the net book value per share
of Toys'  common  stock as of the most recent ended  quarter,  to wit,  June 30,
1999.

     Please  acknowledge  receipt of the foregoing by executing below. Thank you
for your attention to this matter.

Very truly yours,




Receipt of the foregoing is hereby acknowledged by Play Co. Toys &
Entertainment Corp.


James B. Frakes, Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 438 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-305, K2025-303.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26568 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Will of Schneider: Haack, Appellant, vs. Union Trust Company, Respondent.

*February 9*

March *10, 1931.*

*95For the appellant there was a brief by *Field & Field,*attorneys, and *Bagley, Spohn, Ross & Stevens*of counsel, all of Madison, and oral argument by *Ted H. Field*and *W. H. Spohn.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Lowry & Beggs,*and oral argument by *H. J. Lowry*and *Spencer Lucas,*all of Madison.

Fowler, J.

From the facts stated we are of opinion that the learned county judge was justified in inferring as his written decision shows he did infer, that the testatrix signed at the house; that she and Schroeder then went to Dr. Scollard’s office and that the testatrix there acknowledged the signature to the will to be hers; and that the witnesses thereupon signed as witnesses in her presence and the presence of each other, as the attestation clause recites they did. The attestation clause should be given great weight after so long a lapse of time. *Will of Lewis,*51 Wis. 101, *7*N. W. 829. “It creates a strong presumption which must *96prevail unless overcome by clear and satisfactory evidence.” *Will of Grant,*149 Wis. 330, 135 N. W. 833; *Will of Maresh,*177 Wis. 194, 187 N. W. 1009; *Will of Hawkinson,*143 Wis. 136, 126 N. W. 683; *Adams v. Rodman,*102 Wis. 456, 78 N. W. 588, 759; *Will of Foxen,*186 Wis. 640, 203 N. W. 328. In the *Adams*and *Foxen Cases*probate was denied, but both cases recognize the great force of the presumption. That Schroeder signed immediately under the attestation clause is an impeachment, of no little force, of his contradictory testimony so many years afterward. Acknowledging a previously signed signature to a will in presence of both witnesses is equivalent to signing in the presence of both. *Will of Gillmor,*117 Wis. 302, 94 N. W. 32. The apparent identity of the ink in the signature of the witnesses and that both witnesses used a stub pen is some indication that the witnesses used the same pen and signed at the same time, and that the witnesses used a stub and the testatrix a sharp pen and different ink tends to show that Schroeder did not sign at the same time as the testatrix as he testified.

*By the Court.*— The judgment is affirmed.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

IMPERIAL SUGAR COMPANY;

IMPERIAL-SAVANNAH, L.P.,

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 08-1104

NOTICE

REASSIGNMENT OF REVIEW COMMISSION JUDGE

THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that this matter has been reassigned to the

following Review Commission Judge:

Judge Covette Rooney

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

One Lafayette Centre

1120 20th Street, N.W. 9th Floor

Washington, D.C. 20036-3457

Phone: (202) 606-5405

Effective immediately, all pleadings and correspondence shall be filed with the Judge

until she releases jurisdiction ofthe matter.

Dated: January 9, 2009

Washington, D.C.
•

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy ofthe Order was mailed to the parties listed below by first class

mail on January 9, 2009.

08-1104

Stanley E. Keen, Regional Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

Office ofthe Solicitor

Atlanta Federal Center Room 7Tl 0

61 Forsyth Street

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Attention: Karen Mock, Esquire

Charles H. Morgan, Esquire

Alston & Bird, LLP

One Atlantic Center

1201 West Peachtree Street

Atlanta, GA 30309-3424

~~enise M. BOWIe, Adm. Asst.

Post Office Address:

ChiefJudge Irving Sommer

OSHRC

One Lafayette Centre

1120 20th Street, N.W.

Room 990

Washington, D.C. 20036-3457

(202) 606-5405 FAX (202) 606-5409