alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 359/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.359.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 359 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5331 December 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.359.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 359

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5331 December 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 359/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2010 to 31 October 2010(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  ) | 1 |
| 2010/C 359/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 July 2010 to 31 August 2010(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC
  or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC
  ) | 17 |
| 2010/C 359/03 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2010 to 31 October 2010(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC
  or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC
  ) | 18 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 359/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2010 to 31 October 2010(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  )

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council

)

1

2010/C 359/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 July 2010 to 31 August 2010(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC
  or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC
  )

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC

or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC

)

17

2010/C 359/03

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2010 to 31 October 2010(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC
  or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC
  )

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC

or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC

)

18

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN BUSINESS PRODUCTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          60,034
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,133
<INVENTORY>                                     32,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,211
<PP&E>                                         134,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,480
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301,244
<SALES>                                        461,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               461,270
<CGS>                                          322,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  429,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,457
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,337
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (6,550)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 162 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[House]
[Page S10509]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 154

WASHINGTON, MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2008

No. 162
```
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 433 

Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, and the contributions of 

these brave men and women who protect public safety, and expressing 

support for the designation of April 18, 2016, as ‘‘National Lineman 

Appreciation Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2016 

Mr. TILLIS submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, and the contributions of these brave men and women who protect 

public safety, and expressing support for the designation 

of April 18, 2016, as ‘‘National Lineman Appreciation 

Day’’. 

Whereas the profession of linemen is steeped in personal, 

family, and professional tradition; 

Whereas linemen are often first responders during storms 

and other catastrophic events, working to make the scene 

safe for other public safety heroes; 

Whereas linemen must work high atop power lines 24 hours 

a day, 365 days a year, to keep electricity flowing; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 433 ATS 

Whereas linemen play a vital role in the economy of the 

United States by maintaining and growing the energy infrastructure of the United States; 

Whereas linemen must often work under dangerous conditions while separated from their families to keep schools 

and businesses open; 

Whereas linemen put their lives on the line every day with 

little recognition from the community regarding the danger of their work; and 

Whereas April 18, 2016 would be an appropriate date to designate as ‘‘National Lineman Appreciation Day’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the efforts of linemen in keeping 

3 the power on and protecting public safety; and 

4 (2) supports the designation of ‘‘National Line5 man Appreciation Day’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26428]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Clinical Trials in Neurology 
(II).
    Date: December 6, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Shanta Rajaram, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-435-6033, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 7, 2024.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-26428 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000927388
<NAME> BGLS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,868
<SECURITIES>                                    59,809
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     46,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               241,925
<PP&E>                                         132,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 548,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          240,150
<BONDS>                                        191,193
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (158,873)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   548,863
<SALES>                                        217,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,292
<CGS>                                           81,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               300,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (29,650)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                307,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                    83,374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            222,512
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,249
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,056)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   222,705
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 98 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 98

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 11, 2018

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make a correction in the 
                     enrollment of the bill S. 139.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 139, the 

              

Secretary of the Senate shall make the following correction: Amend the 
long title so as to read: ``An Act to amend the Foreign Intelligence 
Surveillance Act of 1978 to improve foreign intelligence collection and 
the safeguards, accountability, and oversight of acquisitions of 
foreign intelligence, to extend title VII of such Act, and for other 
purposes.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 11, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis W. Blazer, Vice President-Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Dennis W. BlazerDennis W. BlazerVice President-Finance and Administration andChief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2009
## Judge Covette Rooney Named Chief Administrative Law Judge

**Judge Covette Rooney Named Chief Administrative Law Judge**

Judge Covette Rooney has been named Chief Administrative Law Judge at the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. Rooney, who has served as an ALJ at the Review Commission since 1996, first became an ALJ at the Social Security Administration in 1994.

During her tenure at the Review Commission, Judge Rooney has distinguished herself through the adjudication and settlement of complex cases. Most recently, as settlement judge, she presided over a multi-million dollar settlement agreement in the Imperial Sugar Co. case involving the Occupational Safety and Health Administration citations stemming from an explosion at its Port Wentworth, Georgia facility.

As Chief Judge, Rooney will be responsible for the management and general administrative supervision of the administrative law judges in the Review Commission’s National office as well as the two regional offices. With an expected increase in the number of contested citations before the Commission, she will also focus on information technology and how it can help the Office of Chief Administrative Law Judge maximize efficiency in both case processing and management.

Before becoming an ALJ, Judge Rooney was the regional counsel for the Mine Safety and Health Administration and Black Lung Benefits Program at the U.S. Department of Labor.

Rooney received her undergraduate degree from Colgate University where in 1970, she was among the small group of women in its first coed first-year class. She went on to receive her Juris Doctor at Temple University School of Law. She is admitted to the Pennsylvania Bar, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

She fills the position previously held by Judge Irving Sommer, who retired at the end of 2010. She is the first woman and only African American to hold this title at the Review Commission.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ROBERT CONWAY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 10-1538 (EGS) 

)

)

SIMON WAINWRIGHT, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an action for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a petitioner who is confined at the

District of Columbia Jail on a parole violator warrant issued by the United States Parole

Commission. See Pet. at 1. For the following reasons, the petition will be denied.

The extraordinary remedy of habeas corpus is available to District of Columbia prisoners

if the prisoner shows that he is “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of

the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). Petitioner challenges the local statute governing

supervised release, D.C. Code § 24-403.01, on the ground that its execution violates the

separation of powers doctrine. He seeks “recall[]” of the statute and his immediate release. Pet.

at 3. 

As the paroling authority for District of Columbia prisoners, the U.S. Parole Commission

is authorized by § 24-403.01(6) to grant, deny, or revoke a District of Columbia offender's parole

supervision and to impose or modify his parole conditions. See § D.C. Code § 24-131(a);

Thompson v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Corrections, 511 F. Supp.2d 111, 114 (D.D.C. 2007). 
2

Because the foregoing statutes govern the execution of a judicially imposed sentence, “[t]he

Parole Commission does not exercise a judicial function and its decisions do not violate the

separation of powers.” Montgomery v. U.S. Parole Comm'n, Civ. Action No. 06-2133 (CKK),

2007 WL 1232190, *2 (D.D.C. Apr. 26, 2007) (citing cases); accord Leach v. U.S. Parole

Comm’n, 522 F. Supp.2d 250, 251 (D.D.C. 2007); Hammett v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, Civ. Action

No. 10-0442 (JDB), 2010 WL 1257669, *1 (D.D.C. Apr. 2, 2010) (Bates, J.) (observing that

“[t]his argument, and similar separation of powers arguments, have been raised often and

rejected each time.”). Cf. with Maddox v. Elzie, 238 F.3d 437, 445 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (explaining

that “Morrissey makes clear that parole revocation is not the continuation of a criminal trial but a

separate administrative proceeding at which the parolee does not possess the same rights as a

criminal defendant at trial.”) (citing Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 480 (1972) (emphasis

added). Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. A separate Order

accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DATE: October 19, 2010
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 /s/ JOSEPH A. GARCÍAName:
    Joseph A. GarcíaTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Administrative Officer,
Senior Executive Vice
President and Secretary
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jonathan Sandelman, state and attest that:



| | (1) |  | I am the President of Main Place Funding, LLC (the Registrant).
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the quarterly Report on 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the quarterly report) containing financial statements fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for
the periods presented.
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    JONATHAN
SANDELMAN   
|Jonathan Sandelman President



May 13, 2003
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

CHARLES W. MASON, DDS &

ASSOCIATES, PLLC

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 10-2313

BRIEFING NOTICE

The Commission requests that the parties brief the following issues:

(1) Did the judge err in affirming Citation 1, Item 1, which alleged a violation of 29

C.F.R. § 1910.1200(h)(1) (hazardous chemical information and training)? In

addressing this question, the parties are asked to discuss: 

(a) the material safety data sheets for the substances at issue which set forth

the chemical manufacturers’ hazard determinations (see 29 C.F.R.

§ 1910.1200(d)(1) (hazard determination)); and 

(b) the training documents which Respondent claims show that its employees

received hazardous chemical training on the substances at issue.

(1) Did the judge err in affirming Citation 1, Item 3a, which alleged a violation of 29

C.F.R. § 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(1) (contaminated sharps discarding and

containment)?

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are

before the Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to

review. Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so

choose.

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief

is to be filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief

1

 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the lefthand margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. 

The Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law,

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the

opposing party. Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only

if appropriate.
must notify the Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the

applicable time for filing briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for

filing briefs (or similar notices of intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date

of service.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: November 15, 2012 _/s/______________________________

Ray H. Darling, Jr.

Executive Secretary

2