alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                           
<ARTICLE>                                       5
                                                 
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   234,003
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          7,596,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       144,497,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                            69,517,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         144,497,964
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      27,706,801
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      21,928,360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          97,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     4,932,006
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          748,907
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      748,907
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             748,907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of ALZA Corporation of our report dated February 14, 1997, included in
the 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders of ALZA Corporation.

Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of
ALZA Corporation listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility
of ALZA's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statement schedule
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-3 No. 33-53671 and No. 333-02765 and Forms S-8 No.
2-92629, No. 2-97422, No. 33-21810, No. 33-36141, No. 33-49824, No. 33-51890,
and No. 333-21877) and in the related Prospectuses, of our report dated
February 14, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial statements
incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding
paragraph with respect to the consolidated financial statement schedule
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of ALZA Corporation.


                                                   Ernst & Young LLP


Palo Alto, California
March 28, 1997



                                        -36-
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Willis C. Moore, III, certify that:

1.   I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polymer Group, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

a)                Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)                Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)               Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date: November 14, 2005 | /s/ WILLIS C. MOORE, III |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                         | Willis C.  Moore, III    |
| * *                     | *Chief  Financial Officer*         |

 

----
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1616

LT Case No. 2020-DP-50

_____________________________

T.F., MOTHER OF T.F. AND J.N.,

CHILDREN,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County.

Cary Frank Rada, Judge.

Amanda Peterson of Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, and 

Frederick William Heath of Law Office of Frederick Heath, 

Tampa, for Appellant.

Rachel Batten, Appellate Attorney of Children’s Legal Services, 

of Department of Children and Families, Brooksville, and Kelly 

Schaeffer of Department of Children and Families, Bradenton; 

and Sara Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, Amanda 

Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney of Appellate Division, and 

Samantha Patricia Wuschke, Co-Counsel, of Guardian ad Litem 

Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

September 15, 2023
2

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, SOUD, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. George Heavlin, Appellant.

Appeal: record: evidence.

*Appeal from Jasper District Court.*— Hon. J. K. Johnson, Judge.

Saturday, May 28, 1892.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of nuisance, committed in keeping for sale and selling intoxicating liquors in violation of law. From the judgment requiring him to pay a fine, attorney’s fee, and costs, and committing him to the county jail at hai’d labor until such fine and costs should he paid, not exceeding one day for each three and one-third dollars of the fine and costs, he *appeals,*

Affirmed.

*IAston McMillan,*for appellant.

*W. G. Clements,*County Attorney, for the state.

Per Curiam.

This cause is submitted on a transcript of the record which does not show any of the evidence submitted on the trial, nor the charge of the court to the jury. The only exception taken by thedefend-ant was to the overruling of a motion for a continuance, but the motion is not set out, and we have no means of judging of the correctness of the ruling. We have examined the record submitted to us with care, but do not find any ground for interfering with the judgment of the district court. It is therefore affirmed.
p.1 

OAR Box 1669 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

JB6) ll-E-12 

Docket Number: 

A-98-13 

Printed 9/23/2008 9:36:49 AM Sheet 80 of 110 
P.2 

A-48-13 

ll-E-12 -

Telephone Contact Report 

Organic Liquids Distribution NESHAP 

From: Greg LaFlam, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: October 22,1997 •———___ 

Contact: Mr. Dan Fiddick | —..»_, 

Company: Support Terminal Services, Inc., Texas City, TX j I ' o. «;:••••-

Telephone Number: (409)948-2339 L EPA ROCKET*""" 

Contact Summary: 

The Texas City terminal operates 24 hrs/day, 7 days/wk, and handles liquids which 

include hydrocarbons, acrylates, acids, isocyanate, toluene, xylene, and some petroleum products 

(but no gasoline). Storage tanks consist of refrigerated (LPG at 10 to 20 °F), insulated, heated 

(190 to 240°F), lined, and internal floating roof type vessels. Modes of liquid transportation 

consist of marine vessel and barge (three docks), truck, rail, and some pipeline. Most 

combinations of transfer (e.g., rail to vessel, etc.) are possible. Tank cleaning services (for tank 

trucks and railcars) are not available at the facility. 

The facility has three flares, one of which controls vapor emissions from marine vessel 

loading. They also have a wastewater handling system. Applicable environmental regulations 

are administered by the Texas TNRC. Mr. Fiddick referred me to Mark Saxton, Environmental 

Coordinator, for additional information (see contact report dated 11/6/97).
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 183 (Monday, December 8, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10804]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                IDAHO BARLEY COMMISSION 20TH ANNIVERSARY

 Mr. CRAPO. Mr. President, it is an honor for me to recognize 
the 20th anniversary of the Idaho Barley Commission, IBC, this year. 
Barley is grown in almost every county in Idaho, and Idaho ranks second 
in the Nation in barley production. The IBC has been working for 
growers for two decades, providing current trends, information and 
educational opportunities to those in the barley industry and 
representing the concerns and needs of barley growers to policymakers 
in Idaho and here in Washington.
  The IBC plays an integral role in fostering markets at home and 
abroad in Taiwan and Japan and is currently developing malting barley 
markets in Mexico, Peru, and Colombia and through the U.S. Grain 
Council. It helps ensure that growers' voices are heard in issues like 
Federal farm policy, Federal malt barley crop insurance, pesticide 
regulations and irrigation. The IBC is working with the University of 
Idaho to establish farm business management schools and provides 
services to growers that include helping farmers optimize herbicide 
usage, boost yields, and cut irrigation costs. The IBC supports 
research on barley breeding, pest management, and extension nurseries.
  The IBC has a successful history of working in conjunction with the 
National Barley Growers Association, the National Barley Foods Council, 
the U.S. Grains Council, and the Idaho Grain Growers Association. This 
important collaboration helps keep elected officials informed about 
their members' needs, policies that work, and those in need of 
improvement. This partnership has been invaluable to me as I continue 
to work with IBC to address the needs of an important part of Idaho's 
agriculture economy.
  Congratulations to the IBC on 20 years of support for one of Idaho's 
most widespread commodities. A healthy barley industry keeps Idaho 
thriving and contributes to our Nation's economy and food 
security.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 24

                        AMDAHL CORPORATION
                        POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors of Amdahl Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, do hereby appoint Bruce J. Ryan, Corporate Secretary
of the Corporation, their lawful attorney and agent for signature
with power to execute the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  The power
granted herewith includes the power and authority to sign the
names of the undersigned directors to any and all amendments
filed to the Annual Report.  Each of the undersigned hereby
ratifies and confirms all that said attorney and agent shall do
pursuant to this power.  This power of attorney may be signed in
several counterparts.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
Power of Attorney as of February 8, 1996.




/s/Keizo Fukagawa                  /s/George R. Packard
-----------------                  --------------------
KEIZO FUKAGAWA                     GEORGE R. PACKARD


/s/Michael R. Hallman              /s/Walter B. Reinhold
---------------------              ---------------------
MICHAEL R. HALLMAN                 WALTER B. REINHOLD


/s/E.F. Heizer, Jr.                /s/Takamitsu Tsuchimoto
-------------------                -----------------------
E.F. HEIZER, JR.                   TAKAMITSU TSUCHIMOTO


/s/Kazuto Kojima                   /s/J. Sidney Webb
----------------                   -----------------
KAZUTO KOJIMA                      J. SIDNEY WEBB



----------------                   --------------------
JOHN C. LEWIS                      E. JOSEPH ZEMKE


/s/Burton G. Malkiel
--------------------
BURTON G. MALKIEL
United States of America
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor
Washington, DC 20036-3457


SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.
OSHRC Docket No. 17-1894
MAXIM CRANE WORKS, 

Respondent.



BRIEFING NOTICE
The parties are requested to brief whether, in light of the facts presented, the standard cited in Citation 1, Item 1, 29 C.F.R. § 1910.28(b)(1)(i) (protection from fall hazards on walking-working surface with unprotected sides and edges), is preempted by the construction standard, 29 C.F.R. § 1926.1423(f) (fall protection during crane assembly/disassembly).  In addressing this issue, the parties are asked to discuss the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Brock v. Cardinal Indus., Inc. ̧ 828 F.2d 373 (6th Cir. 1987).
The parties are advised that, when a case is directed for review to consider either the merits or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review.  Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.
All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.[1]  The first brief is to be filed within 40 days of this notice.  A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission 

in accordance with Commission Rule 93.  The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service.

						BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION




Dated:	February 14, 2020			/s/					
						John X. Cerveny
						Executive Secretary
---------------------------
[1]
 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies.  The Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party.  Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 7, 2010



|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                                                                                    
|Dean L. Cash President and
Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE DI STRI CT OF COLUMBIA ROBERT CONWAY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-1538 ( EGS) ) ) SI MON WAI

NWRI GHT, et al. , ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON This is an action for

a wr it of habeas corpus filed by a petitioner who is confined at the District of Columbia J ail on a par ole violator wa rra nt issued by

the United States Parole Commi ssion. SeePet. at 1. For the followingrea sons, the petition will be denied. The e x traordina

ry reme dy of habeas corpus is available to District of Columbia prisoner s if the prisoner

shows that he is “in custody in violation of the Consti tution or laws or trea ties of the United States.” 28 U .S.C. § 2241(c)(3) . Petitioner challeng es the loca l statute g overning supervised r elea se, D.C. Code § 24-403.01, on the ground that its execution violates the separ ation of powe rs doctrine . He se eks “r eca ll[ ]” of the statute and his immediate r elea se. Pet. at 3. As the par oling a

uthority for District of

Columbi a prisoner s, the U.S. Parole Commissi on is authorized by

§ 24-403.01(6) to gr ant, deny , or re voke a D istrict of Columbia offende r' s parole supervision and to impose or modify his parole c onditions. See§ D.C. Code § 24-131(a ); Thompson v. District of Col umbia Dep’ t of Corr ections , 511 F. Supp.2d 111, 114 (D.D .C. 2007).2

Be cause the fore g oing statutes g overn the execution of a judicially imposed sentence , “[t] he Parole Commission does not ex erc ise a judicial func tion and its decisions do not viol ate the separ ation of powe rs.” Montgomery v. U.S. Parole Comm 'n , Civ. Action No. 06-2133 (CKK) , 2007 WL 1232190, *2 (D.D.C. Apr . 26, 2007) (c iting ca ses); ac cord Leach v. U

.S. Parole Comm’n , 522 F. Supp.2d 250, 251 (D.D .C. 2007); Hamme tt v. U.S. Parole Comm’n , Civ. Action No. 10-0442 (JDB) , 2010 WL 1257669, *1 (D.D.C. Apr . 2, 2010) (B ates, J.) (observingthat “[t] his argument, and similar sepa ration of powe rs ar g uments, have be en ra ised often a nd reje cted e ach time.” ). Cf. wi th Maddox v . Elzie , 238 F.3d 437, 445 ( D.C. Cir. 2001) (explaining that “ Morrisseymakes c lear

that parole revoc ation is not the continuation of a cr iminal trial but a separ ate administrati veproce eding at which the pa rolee does not possess the same r ights a s a criminal def

endant at trial.”) ( citing Morrissey v . Brewer , 408 U.S. 471, 480 (1972) (e mphasis added) . Acc ording ly , the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. A sepa rate Orde r

acc ompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

SI GNED: EMMET G. SUL L I VAN UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT J UDGE DATE: Oc tober 19, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           FEB-29-2000

<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              163,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                              4,051,763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         4,295,440
<PP&E>                                  29,426,300
<DEPRECIATION>                           5,521,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          31,597,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    3,802,986
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         2
<OTHER-SE>                              10,597,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            31,597,999
<SALES>                                  9,176,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         9,176,247
<CGS>                                    8,893,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            9,560,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         (215,033)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         861,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (1,030,589)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (1,030,589)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                           (1,030,589)
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.000



</TABLE>