alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000927388
<NAME> BGLS INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     42,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,012
<PP&E>                                         108,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 246,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          298,552
<BONDS>                                        280,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (415,157)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   246,956
<SALES>                                        108,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,409
<CGS>                                           41,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,310
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (16,244)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,613
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,729
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,884
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,249
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Jones *v.*Brinkley.

Debt upon two bonds subscribed by a witness, who «pon search could not be found. This being proved to the Court, his hand-writing was proved, and the bond given in evidence.

Note. — Vide *Clements & Co.*v. *Eason & Wright, ante*18,
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90351-90352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26683]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control

Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of this person are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: This action was issued on November 12, 2024. See Supplementary 
Information section for relevant date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Lisa M. Palluconi, Acting 
Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, 
tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-
2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or 
the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 
202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Action

    On November 12, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following 
person are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.

[[Page 90352]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15NO24.002

Lisa M. Palluconi,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2024-26683 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
```
1

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-0AR-20IO-0620; FRL- ---.J

Approval and Promulgation ofAir Quality Implementation Plans;

Texas; Revisions to the New Source Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP);

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Texas PSD State Implementation

Plan (SIP). EPA proposes to approve a SIP revision submitted February 1, 2006, as amended by

a SIP revision submitted July 16, 2010. This action makes no significant changes to the Texas

PSD SIP; it merely approves reorganization and renumbering ofthe Texas PSD SIP rules.

Further, the July 16, 2010 submission corrects certain deficiencies identified in EPA's September

23,2009 proposed disapproval. The EPA proposes to approve these revisions pursuant to

section 110 and part C ofthe Federal Clean Air Act (Act or CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before [Insert date 30 days from date of

publication in the Federal Registerl.
2

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailedto Mr. Stanley M. Spruiell, AirPermits Section

(6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas

75202-2733. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier

by following the detailed instructions in the Addresses section of the direct final rule located in

the rules section ofthis Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley M. Spruiell, Air Permits Section

(6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-7212; fax number 214-665-7263; e-mail address

Spruiell.stanley@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section ofthis Federal Register,

EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because

the Agencyviews this as a noncontroversial submittal andanticipates no adverse comments. A

detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in thedirect final rule. Ifno relevant adverse

comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. IfEPA

receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn andall public

comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on thisproposed rule.

EPAwill notinstitute a secondcomment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this

actionshould do so atthistime. Please notethat if EPAreceives adverse comment on an

amendment, paragraph, or sectionofthis rule and if that provision may be severed from the
3

remainder of the rule, EPA mayadopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject

of an adverse comment.

For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules section of

this Federal Register.

_?;hi_10__

Dated: A! endaiiz,

Regional Administrator, Re 6.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90084-90085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26324]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a

[[Page 90085]]

domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service 
Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products 
List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 588 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-227, K2025-225.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26324 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Polymer Group, Inc.'s Form 10Q for the quarter ended October 2, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                         24,069
<SECURITIES>                                   15,417
<RECEIVABLES>                                 140,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                   10,072
<INVENTORY>                                   103,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              318,041
<PP&E>                                        972,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                171,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,402,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         140,780
<BONDS>                                       599,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          320
<OTHER-SE>                                    239,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,402,330
<SALES>                                       222,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              222,486
<CGS>                                         161,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 161,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,055
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                    4,515
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             8,203
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    8,203
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.26



</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26614]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 15, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 671 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-334, K2025-332.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26614 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
14910-I3-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANS10RTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

L.<0-.

~oum,G S'-MBOl

DATE

i o/L.LI", ACTION: Final rule.

RlN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airous Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, an

I INI'rIM,SISIG

-243F Airplanes, Model A330-3j;OOSelies Airplanes, and Model A340-200, A340-300, DAT~-

A340-500, and A340-600 Serie Airplanes \0 i."l Q

j OUTIN ""MOO.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTranSpOliation

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0675; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-061-AD; Amendme

IIPSDI ;i..3-IJ.1

39-*****; AD 2010-**-**)

14 CFRPart 39

(DOT).

DATE

NlTlAL'''''G

"(lUriNG 'YMBDL

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthmess directive (AD) for the products lis I,\I~"'SIG

above. This AD results from mlctatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) ATE

I

ongmated by an aviatlon authority of another country to Identify and correct an unsafe kQUllNGSYM!lOl

.. I . ~~

conditIOn on an aVIatIOn produC1" The MeAl descnbes the unsafe condlhon as.

DAI E

* * *1 * '" * *

ROlITJN[] sYMBOl.

Investigation conducted Py Tha1es on * * * probes revealed oil residue

between the stator and the rotor parts of the AoA [angle of attack] vane

position resolvers. This 6il residue was due to incorrect cleaning of the

machining oil during thelmanufacturing process of the AoA resolvers. At

low temperatures, this oi~Tesidue becomes viscous (typically in cruise)

causing lag of AoA vane movement.

Such condition could IJd to discrepant AoA measurement. Ifnot

conceted, and iftv.'o or t~ee AoA probes were simultaneously affected

and provided \\/fong indications of the AoA to a similar extent, it could

lead to a late activation dfthe angle of attack protection, which in
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02
- 11
- 00542
- CR
BILLY RICHARD RENFRO , JR. APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appe llant Billy Richard Renfro, Jr. attempts to appeal his January 2011

c onviction and life sentence for murder

. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
On October 17, 2011, Appellant filed in the trial court a pro se notice of appeal and a pro se “Motion for Pe rmission to File Direct Appeal Under the Texas Rules of Appellant [sic] Procedures, Rule 25.2(A)(2)(B).” Concerned that we did not have jurisdiction over Appellant’s attempted appeal, we informed Appellant and his counsel by letter on December 8 , 201 1 , th at this appeal was subject to dismissal unless Appellant or any party showed grounds for continuing

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

the appeal on or before December 19, 2011

. Appellant and his counsel responded, but the respo nse s do not show grounds on which this court may rely
for cont inuing this appeal. Jurisdiction is vested in this court by a timely filed notice of appeal. Slaton
v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A defendant’ s notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order, or within ninety days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2. Because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, it does not invoke this court’s jurisdiction. Furthermore, t his court does not have authority to grant an out

- of

time appeal. See Slaton , 981 S.W. 2d at 210 (reasoning that if an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals has no jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss it). Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s motion as moot and dismiss th is a ppeal for want of jurisdiction. See
Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); 43.2(f); Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 523.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )
DELIVERED: December 29, 2011
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 186 (Thursday, December 11, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10889]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10678]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  ADJOURNMENT UNTIL 9:30 A.M. TOMORROW

  Mr. CASEY. If there is no further business to come before the Senate, 
I ask unanimous consent that it stand adjourned under the previous 
order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 6:42 p.m., adjourned until 
Thursday, November 20, 2008, at 9:30 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket Nos. 09-2011 & 09-2055

CRANESVILLE AGGREGATE COMPANIES, 

INC., d/b/a SCOTIA BAG PLANT,

Respondent.

REMAND ORDER

Before: MACDOUGALL, Chairman; ATTWOOD and SULLIVAN, Commissioners.

BY THE COMMISSION:

This case is before the Commission on remand from the United States Court of Appeals 

for the Second Circuit. Sec’y of Labor v. Cranesville Aggregate Cos., 878 F.3d 25 (2d Cir. 2017). 

Former Administrative Law Judge Ken S. Welsch vacated six citations issued by the Occupational 

Safety and Health Administration, concluding that the Mine Safety and Health Administration’s 

standards, rather than OSHA’s, applied to the cited conditions. Cranesville Aggregate Cos., 24 

BNA OSHC 1115, 1123 (No. 09-2011, 2013) (consolidated) (ALJ) (“Because MSHA has statutory 

authority to regulate the working conditions[,] . . . MSHA preempts OSHA’s authority under 

§ 4(b)(1) of the [OSH] Act.”). The judge’s decision became the final order of the Commission. 

Cranesville Aggregate Cos., 25 BNA OSHC 2001 (No. 09-2011, 2016) (consolidated). The 

Second Circuit reversed, ruling that “the Commission did not afford proper deference to the 

Secretary’s reasonable determination” regarding applicability of OSHA’s standards. 878 F.3d at 

36.
2

By mandate filed February 27, 2018, the court has remanded this case to the Commission. 

We, in turn, remand this case to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for reassignment and further 

proceedings consistent with the court’s opinion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/

Heather L. MacDougall

Chairman

/s/

Cynthia L. Attwood

Commissioner

/s/

James J. Sullivan, Jr.

Dated: March 13, 2018 Commissioner
# Official Journal L 127/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.127.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 127 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5515 May 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.127.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 127

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5515 May 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 385/2012 of 30 April 2012 on the farm return to be used for determining the incomes of agricultural holdings and analysing the business operation of such holdings | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 385/2012 of 30 April 2012 on the farm return to be used for determining the incomes of agricultural holdings and analysing the business operation of such holdings

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Tune *v.*Williams.

Judgment had been given for the Plaintiff on a bond, in the County Court of Warren, for twenty-nine *pounds;*and Williams alleging he ought to have credits to a considerable amount, Plaintiff agreed to come to a setilement, and credit the judgment with such sum as he had paid : they came to this settlement, and credited all but fifty *shillings;*and Williams assumed to pay that sum if Mr. Lyue had not paid it for him to the Plaintiff. Mr. Lyne in fact had not paid it, and a warrant was brought upon this assumpsit, and judgment for Plaintiff: and the suit removed by *certiorari*to this Court, Upon the evidence here, it was objected by Col. *Davie,*that there being a judgment now existing for this fifty shillings, no action upon assumpsit could be-brought for it; and so ruled the Court arid nonsuited the Plaintiff. Col. *Davie*cited *Bull.*128, which cites *Cro. J.*206.

Note. — Vide *Bain*v. *Hunt,*3 *Hawks,*592.
1 Date: August 2 0 , 2010 Subject: Minutes of the August 17 , 2010 Conference Call with Ne vada Division of Environmental Protection EPA Contract No. EP

- D

- 06

- 118; EPA Work Assignment No. 4

- 06 RTI Project No. 0210426.004.006

From: Chuck French OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243

- 02) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

To: Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0239

I

. Introduction

A conference call with Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) was held o n August 17 , 20 10 . The purpose of the meeting was to discuss NDEP’s major comments to the proposed rule. This memorandum summarizes the major topics discussed during the meeting

.

II

. Attendees
Mike Elges, NDEP Rob Bamford, NDEP

Chuck French, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Marvin Branscome, RTI Internat ional Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

III

. Discussion
The major topics discussed during the meeting included title V permitting, compliance date for new sources, new source limit and percent reduction alternative for carbon processes affected
source, ann ual compliance schedule, Method 29 for annual mercury testing, other mercury test methods, consistency of units in equations, one

- hour periods, calendar year basis, measuring ore as fed to autoclave, mercury concentration monitoring for roasters, mercury c oncentration monitoring for carbon adsorbers, definition of retort, and outlier test data.