***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xi LIST OF TABLES
Table ES

- 1. Summary of Emission Reductions by Sector for Known Controls for 70 ppb Proposed Alternative Standard Level for 2025, except California (1,000 tons/year) a

........ 8
Table ES

- 2. Summary of Emission Reductions by Sector for Known Controls for 65 ppb Proposed Alternative Standard Level for 2025

- except California (1,000 tons/year) a

...... 8
Table ES

- 3. Summary of Emission Reductions by Sector for Known Controls for 60 ppb Alternative Standard Level for 2025

- except California (1,000 tons/year) a

....................... 8
Table ES

- 5. Summary of Emissions Reductions by Alternative Standard Level for Unknown Controls for post

- 2025

- California (1,000 tons/year) a

................................ ..... 10
Table ES

- 6. Total Annual Costs a and Benefits b for U.S., except California in 2025 (billions of 2011$, 7% Dis count Rate)

................................ ................................ .............. 13
Table ES

- 7. Summary of Total Number of Annual Ozone and PM

- Related Premature Mortalities and Premature Morbidity: 2025 National Benefits a

................................ ....... 13
Table ES

- 8. Total Annual Costs a and Benefits b for California, post

- 2025 (billions of 2011$, 7% Dis count Rate)

................................ ................................ ................................ . 15
Table ES

- 9. Summary of Total Number of Annual Ozone and PM

- Related Premature Mortalities and Premature Morbidity: Post

- 2025 a

................................ ............................. 15
Table 3

- 1. 2011 and 2025 Base Case VOC and NO x Emissions by Sector (thousand tons) 10
Table 3

- 2. List of Emissions Sensitivity Cases that Were Modeled in CAMx to Determine Ozone Response Factors

................................ ................................ .................. 14
Table 3

- 3. Anthropogenic NO x and VOC Emissions from the 2025 Base and Explicit Control Cases*

................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 15
Table 3A

- 1. Daily maximum 8

- hour ozone performance statistics ≥ 60 ppb by region, by network.

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 6
Table 3A

- 2. Key monitoring sites used for the ozone time series analysis.

............................. 11
Table 3A

- 3. Emissions reductions applied to create the baseline scenario*

............................ 25
Table 3A

- 4. Emissions reductions applied beyond the baseline scenario to create the 70 ppb scenario

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 26
Table 3A

- 5. Emissions reductions applied beyond the baseline scenario to create the 65 ppb scenario

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 26***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xii Table 3A

- 6. Emissions reductions applied beyond the baseline scenario to create the 60 ppb scenario

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 26
Table 3A

- 7. Design Values for California Region monitors

................................ .................... 27
Table 3A

- 8. Design Values for Southwest monitors

................................ ................................ 31
Table 3A

- 9. Design Values for Central region monitors

................................ .......................... 34
Table 3A

- 10. Design Values for Midwest monitors

................................ ................................ ... 39
Table 3A

- 11. Design Values for Northeast monitors

................................ ................................ . 45
Table 3A

- 12. Monitors without projections due to insufficient high modeling days to meet EPA guidance for projecting design values

................................ ................................ ....... 51
Table 3A

- 13. Monitors determined to have design values affected by winter ozone events

..... 53
Table 3A

- 14. Monitors with limit ed response to regional NOx and national VOC emissions reductions in the 2025 baseline

................................ ................................ ......... 56
Table 4

- 1. Controls Applied for the Alternative Standard Analyses Control Strategy

............ 6
Table 4

- 2. Summary of Emission Reductions by Sector for Known Controls Applied to Demonstrate Attainment of the Current Standard for the 2025 Baseline

- U.S., except California (1,000 tons/year) a

................................ ................................ .............................. 10
Table 4

- 3. Summary of Emission Reductions (Known and Unknown Controls) Applied to Demonstrate Attainment in California for the post

- 2025 Baseline (1,000 tons/year) a

................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 10
Table 4

- 4. Number of Counties with Exceedances and Number of Additional Counties Where Reductions Were Applied for the 2025 Alternative Standards Analyses

- U.S., except California

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 17
Table 4

- 5. Summary of Emission Reduction s by Sector for Known Controls Applied to Demonstrate Nationwide Attainment with a 70 ppb Ozone Standard in 2025, except California (1,000 tons/year) a

................................ ................................ .............................. 17
Table 4

- 6. Summary of Emission Reductions by Sector for Known Controls Applied to Demonstrate Nationwi de Attainment with a 65 ppb Ozone Standard in 2025

- except California (1,000 tons/year) a

................................ ................................ .............................. 18
Table 4

- 7. Summary of Emission Reductions by Sector for Known Controls Applied to Demonstrate Nationwide Attainment with a 60 ppb Ozone Standard in 2025

- except C alifornia (1,000 tons/year) a

................................ ................................ .............................. 18
Table 4

- 8. Summary of Emissions Reductions by Alternative Standard for Unknown Controls for 2025

- except California (1,000 tons/year) a

................................ ................... 20***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xiii Table 4

- 9. Summary of Emissions Reductions by Alternative Level for Unknown Controls for post

- 2025

- California (1,000 tons/year) a

................................ ...................... 20
Table 4

- 10. Summary of Known and Unknown Emissions Reductions by Alternative Standard Levels in 2025, Except California (1,000 tons/year) a

................................ ......... 21
Table 4

- 11. Summary of Known and Unknown Emissions Reductions by Alternative Standard Levels for post

- 2025

- California (1,000 tons/year) a

................................ .......... 22
Table A4

- 1. Geographic Areas for Application of NOx Controls in the Baseline and Alternative Standard Analyses

- U.S., except California a

................................ ................... 2
Table A4

- 2. Geographic Areas for Applic ation of VOC Controls in the Baseline and Alternative Standard Analyses

- U.S., except California a

................................ ................... 3
Table A4

- 3. Geographic Areas for Application of NO x Controls in the Baseline and Alternative Standard Analyses

- California a

................................ ................................ ........ 3
Table A4

- 4. Geographic Areas for Application of VOC Controls in the Baseline and Alternative Standard Analyses

- California a

................................ ................................ ........ 4
Table A4

- 5. NO x Control Measures Applied in the Baseline Analysis

................................ ...... 5
Table A4

- 6. VOC Control Measures Applied in the Baseline Analysis

................................ ..... 6
Table A4

- 7. NOx Contr ol Measures Applied in the 70 ppb Alternative Standard Analysis

...... 6
Table A4

- 8. VOC Control Measures Applied in the 70 ppb Alternative Standard Analysis

..... 8
Table A4

- 9. NOx Control Measures Applied in the 65 ppb Alternative Standard Analysis

...... 8
Table A4

- 10. VOC Control Measures Applied in the 65 ppb Alternative Standard Analysis

... 10
Table A4

- 11. NOx Control Measures Applied in the 60 ppb Alternative Standard Analysis

.... 10
Table A4

- 12. VOC Control Measures Applied in the 60 ppb Alternative Standard Analysis

... 12
Table 5

- 1. Estimated Monetized Benefits of Attainment of the Alternative Ozone Standards for the 2025 Scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard everywhere in the U.S. except California)

– Full Attainment (billions of 2011$) a

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 3

T able 5

- 2. Estimated Monetized Benefits of Attainment of the Alternative Ozone Standards for the Post

- 2025 Scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard just in California)

– Full Attainment (billions of 2011$) a

.................. 3
Table 5

- 3. Human He alth Effects of Pollutants Potentially Affected by Strategies to Attain the Primary ozone standards (endpoints included in the core analysis are identified with a red checkmark)

................................ ................................ ......................... 5***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xiv Table 5

- 4. Baseline Incidence Rates and Population Prevalence Rates for Use in Impact Functions, General Population

................................ ................................ ........................... 27
Table 5

- 5. Asthma Prevalence Rates

................................ ................................ ..................... 28
Table 5

- 6. Criteria Used When Selecting C

- R Functions

................................ ...................... 31
Table 5

- 7. Health Endpoints and Epidemiological Studies Used to Quantify ozone

related Health Impacts in the Core Anal ysis a

................................ ................................ ... 34
Table 5

- 8. Health Endpoints and Epidemiological Studies Used to Quantify PM 2.5 - related Health Impacts in the Core Analysis a

................................ ................................ ... 35
Table 5

- 9. Health Endpoints and Epidemiological Studies Used to Quantify ozone

related Health Impacts in the Sensitivity Analysis a

................................ .......................... 36
Table 5

- 10. Unit Values for Economic Valuation of Health Endpoints (2011$) a

.................. 57
Table 5

- 11. Influence of Applied VSL Attributes on t he Size of the Economic Benefits of Reductions in the Risk of Premature Death (U.S. EPA, 2006a)

................................ ... 63
Table 5

- 12. Unit Values for Hospital Admissions a

................................ ................................ . 68
Table 5

- 13. Alternative Direct Medical Cost of Illness Estimates for Nonfatal Heart Attacks a

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 70
Table 5

- 14. Estimated Costs Over a 5

- Year Period of a Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (in 2011$) a

................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 70
Table 5

- 15. Elasticity Values Used to Account for Projected Real Income Growth a

............. 75
Table 5

- 16. Adjustment Factors Used to Account for Projected Real Income Growt h a

........ 76
Table 5

- 17. Population

- Weighted Air Quality Change for the Proposed and Alternative Annual Primary ozone Standards Relative to Analytical Baseline for 2025 a

.................. 78
Table 5

- 18. Emission Reductions in Illustrative Emission Reduction Strategies for the P roposed and Alternative Annual Primary ozone standards, by Pollutant and Region Relative to Analytical Baseline

– Full Attainment (tons) a

................................ ................. 78
Table 5

- 19. Estimated Number of Avoided ozone Health Impacts for the Proposed and Alternative Annual Ozone Standard s (Incremental to the Analytical Baseline) for the 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard everywhere in the U.S. except California) a, b

................................ ................................ ....................... 79
Table 5

- 20. Total Monetized ozone Benefits for the Proposed and Alternative Annu al Ozone Standards (Incremental to the Analytical Baseline) for the 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard everywhere in the U.S. except California) (millions of 2011) a, b

................................ ................................ ............ 80***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xv Table 5

- 21. Estimated Number of Avoided PM 2.5 Health Impacts for the Proposed and Alternative Annual Ozone Standards (Incremental to the Analytical Baseline) for the 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard everywhere in the U.S. except California) a

................................ ................................ .......................... 81
Table 5

- 22. Mo netized PM 2.5 Health Co

- Benefits for the Proposed and Alternative Annual Ozone Standards (Incremental to Analytical Baseline) for the 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard everywhere in the U.S. except California) (Milli ons of 2011) a,b,c

................................ ................................ ........... 81
Table 5

- 23. Estimate of Monetized Ozone and PM 2.5 Benefits for Proposed and Alternative Annual Ozone Standards Incremental to the Analytical Baseline for the 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard eve rywhere in the U.S. except California)

– Full Attainment (billions of 2011$) a,b

............................ 82
Table 5

- 24. Regional Breakdown of Monetized Ozone

- Specific Benefits Results for the 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard everywhere in the U.S. except California)

– Full Attainment a

................................ ............................. 83
Table 5

- 25. Population

- Weighted Air Quality Change for the Proposed and Alternative Annual Primary ozone Standards Relative to Analytical Baseline for post

- 2025 a

........... 83
Table 5

- 26. Estimated Number of Avoided Ozone Health Impacts for the Proposed and Alternative Annual Ozone Standards (Incremental to the Analytical Baseline) for the Post

- 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard just in California) a, b

................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 84
Table 5

- 27. Total Mone tized ozone Benefits for the Proposed and Alternative Annual Ozone Standards (Incremental to the Analytical Baseline) for the post

- 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard just in California) (millions of 2011) a, b

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 85
Tabl e 5

- 28. Estimated Number of Avoided PM 2.5 Health Impacts for the Proposed and Alternative Annual Ozone Standards (Incremental to the Analytical Baseline) for the post

- 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard just in Califor nia) a

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 86
Table 5

- 29. Monetized PM 2.5 Health Co

- Benefits for the Proposed and Alternative Annual Ozone Standards (Incremental to Analytical Baseline) for the post

- 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard just in California) (Millions of 2011) a,b

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 86
Table 5

- 30. Estimate of Monetized Ozone and PM 2.5 Benefits for Proposed and Alternative Annual Ozone Standards Incremental to the Analytical Baseline for the post

- 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard just in California)

– Full Attainment (billions of 2011$) a

................................ ................................ .............. 87***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xvi Table 5

- 31. Regional Breakdown of Monetized Ozone

- Specific Benefits Results for the post

- 2025 scenario (nationwide benefits of attaining each alternative standard just in California)

– Full Attainment a

................................ ................................ .......................... 88
Table 5A

- 1. Summary of Qualitative Uncertainty for Key Modeling Elements in O 3 Benefits

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 6
Table 5B

- 1. Long

- term O3 Mortality Incidence at Various Assumed Thresholds a

.................. 4
Table 5B

- 2. Application of Alternative (Expert Elicitation

- Based Effect Estimates) to the Modeling of PM 2.5 Co

- benefit Estimates for PM 2.5 (av oided incidence)

............................ 7
Table 5B

- 3. Ranges of Elasticity Values Used to Account for Projected Real Income Growth a

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 8
Table 5B

- 4. Ranges of Adjustment Factors Used to Account for Projected Real Income Growth to 2024 a

................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 8
Table 5B

- 5. Sensitivity of Monetized O 3 Benefits to Alternative Income Elasticities in 2025 (Millions of 2011$) a

................................ ................................ ................................ ... 8
Table 5C

- 1. Potential Reduction in Premature Mortality by Age Range from Attaining Alternate Ozone Standards (2025 scenario) a, b

................................ ................................ .... 4
Table 5C

- 2. Potential Years of Life Gained by A ge Range from Attaining Alternate O3 Standards (2025 Scenario) a,b

................................ ................................ ............................... 4
Table 5C

- 3. Estimated Percent Reduction in All

- Cause Mortality Attributed to the Proposed Primary Ozone Standards (2025 Scenario) a

................................ ........................ 5
Table 5C

- 4. Population Exposure in the Baseline Sector Modeling (used to generate the benefit

- per
- ton estimates) Above and Below Various Concentrations Benchmarks in the Underlying Epidemiology Studies a

................................ ................................ ............. 12
Table 5C

- 5. Fraction of Total Core Benefits Associated with P artial Attainment (application of known controls) (2025 Scenario)

................................ .............................. 14
Table 5D

- 1. Health Endpoints and Epidemiological Studies Used to Quantify PM 2.5 - related Health Impacts in the Core Analysis a

................................ ................................ ..... 4
Table 5D

- 2. Summary of Effect estimates from Associated wit h Change in Long

- Term Exposure to PM 2.5 in Recent Cohort Studies in North America

................................ ........ 10
Table 6

- 1. Welfare Effects of NOx and VOC emissions

................................ ......................... 3
Table 6

- 2. Change in Consumer and Producer Surplus in the Forestry Sector from Attaining Alternative Ozone Standard L evels Compared to Attaining the Current Ozone Standard (Million 2011$)

................................ ................................ ....................... 10***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xvii Table 6

- 3. Percent Change in Consumer and Producer Surplus in the Forestry Sector from Attaining Alternative Ozone Standard Levels Compared to Attaining the Current Ozone Standard

................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 11
Table 6

- 4. Change in Consumer and Producer Surplus in the Agricultural Sector from Attaining Alternative Ozone Standard Levels Compared to Attaining the Current Ozone Standard (Million 2011$)

................................ ................................ ....................... 11
Table 6

- 5. Percent Change in Consumer and Producer Surplus i n the Agricultural Sector from Attaining Alternative Ozone Standard Levels Compared to Attaining the Current Ozone Standard

................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 11
Table 6

- 6. Annualized Changes in Consumer and Producer Surplus in Agriculture and Forestry from Attaining Alternative Ozone Stand ard Levels Compared to Attaining the Current Ozone Standard, 2010

- 2040, Million 2011$ (3% Discount Rate)

.................. 12
Table 6

- 7. Annualized Percent Changes in Consumer and Producer Surplus in Agriculture and Forestry from Attaining Alternative Ozone Standard Levels Compared to Attaining the Current Ozone Standard, 2010

- 2040, (3% Discount Rate)

.... 13
Table 6

- 8. Annualized Changes in Consumer and Producer Surplus in Agriculture and Forestry from Attaining Alternative Ozone Standard Levels Compared to Attaining the Current Ozone Standard, 2010

- 2040, Million 2011$ (7% Discount Rate)

.................. 13
Table 6

- 9. Annualized Percent Changes in Consumer and Producer Surplus in Agriculture and Forestry from Attaining Alternative Ozone Standard Levels Compared to Attaining the Current Ozone Stan dard, 2010

- 2040, (7% Discount Rate)

.... 13
Table 6

- 10. Increase in Carbon Sequestration from Attaining Alternative Ozone Standard Levels Compared to Attaining the Current Ozone Standard , MMtCO 2 e

.......................... 15
Table 6

- 11. Percent Change in Carbon Sequestration from Attain ing Alternative Ozone Standard Levels Compared to Attaining the Current Ozone Standard , MMtCO 2 e

........... 15
Table 6A

- 1. Comparison of Total Cropland and Forestland NLCD Area (sq m)

...................... 2
Table 6A

- 2. Parameter Values Used for Crops and Tree Species

................................ .............. 5
Table 6A

- 3. Mapping of Ozone Impacts on Crops to FASOMGHG Crops

............................... 6
Table 6A

- 4. Mapping of Ozone Impacts on Forests to FASOMGHG Forest Types

.................. 7
Table 6A

- 5. Forestland W126 Ozone Values under Alternative Scenarios

............................. 11
Table 6A

- 6. Cropland W126 Ozone Values under Modeled Scenarios

................................ ... 12
Table 6A

- 7. Agricultural Production Fisher Indices (Current conditions =100)

...................... 26
Table 6A

- 8. Major Crop Acreage, Million Acres

................................ ................................ ..... 29***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xviii Table 6A

- 9. Forest Products Production, Million Cubic Feet

................................ .................. 31
Table 6A

- 10. Forest Product Prices, U.S. Dollars per Cubic Foot

................................ ............. 32
Table 6A

- 11. Forest Product Prices and Percentage Change, U.S. Dollars per Cubic Foot

....... 33
Table 6A

- 12. Forest Acres Harvested, Thousand Acres

................................ ............................. 34
Table 6A

- 13. Existing and New Forest Inventory, Million Cubic Feet

................................ ...... 35
Table 6A

- 14. Land Use by Major Cat egory, Thousand Acres

................................ ................... 36
Table 6A

- 15. Consumer and Producer Surplus in Agriculture, Million 2010 U.S. Dollars

....... 38
Table 6A

- 16. Consumer and Producer Surplus in Forestry, Million 2010 U.S. Dollars

............ 39
Table 6A

- 17. Annualized Changes in Consumer and Producer S urplus in Agriculture and Forestry, 2010

– 2044, Million 2010 U.S. Dollars (3% Discount Rate)

.............................. 40
Table 6A

- 18. Annualized Changes in Consumer and Producer Surplus in Agriculture and Forestry, 2010

– 2044, Million 2010 U.S. Dollars (7% Discount Rate)

.............................. 40
Table 6A

- 19. Carbon Storage, MMtCO 2 e

................................ ................................ .................. 42
Table 6A

- 20. Forestry Carbon Sequestration, MMtCO 2 e

................................ ........................... 43
Table 7

- 1. Summary of Known Annualized Control Costs by Sector for 70 ppb for 2025 7

- U.S., except California (millions of 2011$) a

................................ ................................ ................. 7
Table 7

- 2. Summary of Known Annualized Control Costs by Sector for 65 ppb for 2025 8

- U.S., except California (millions of 2011$) a

................................ ................................ ................. 8
Table 7

- 3. Summary of Known Annualized Control Costs by Sector for 60 ppb for 2025 8

- U.S., except California (millions of 2011$) a

................................ ................................ ................. 8
Table 7

- 4. Compa rison of Key Assumptions Used in Developing Estimates of NOx Emissions Controls and Costs across Past and Current Ozone NAAQS Regulatory Impact Analyses a

................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 14
Table 7

- 5. Average NO x Offset Prices in Four Areas (2011$) a

................................ ............ 21
Table 7

- 6. Annualized NOx Offset P rices for Four Areas (2011$) a

................................ ...... 22***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xix Table 7

- 7. Extrapolated Control Costs in 2025 by Alternative Standard for 2025

-- U.S., except California (millions of 2011$)

................................ ................................ ................ 29
Table 7

- 8. Extrapolated Control Costs in 2025 by Alternative Standard for Post

- 2025

-- Californ ia (millions of 2011$)

................................ ................................ ........................... 29
Table 7

- 9. Summary of Total Control Costs (Known and Extrapolated) by Alternative Level for 2025

- U.S., except California (millions of 2011$, 7% Discount Rate) a

........... 31
Table 7

- 10. Summary of Total Control Costs (Known and Extrapolate d) by Alternative Level for post

- 2025

- California (millions of 2011$, 7% Discount Rate) a

........................ 31
Table A7

- 1. Costs for Known NOx Controls in the 70 ppb Analysis (millions of 2011$) a

....... 1
Table A7

- 2. Costs for Known VOC Controls in the 70 ppb Analysis (millions of 2011$) a

...... 2
Table A7

- 3. Costs for Known NO x Controls in the 65 ppb Analysis (millions of 2011$) a

....... 3
Table A7

- 4. Costs for Known VOC Controls in the 65 ppb Analysis (millions of 2011$) a

...... 4
Table A7

- 5. Costs for Known NOx Controls in the 60 ppb Analysis (millions of 2011$) a

...... 5
Table A7

- 6. Costs for Known VOC Controls in the 60 ppb Analysis (millions of 2011$) a

...... 6
Table A7

- 7. Extrapolated Control Costs in 2025 by Alternative Standard for 2025 U.S., except California, using Alternative Fixed Cost Assumptions (millions of 2011$)

............ 7
Table A7

- 8. Extrapolated Control Costs in 2025 by Alternative Standard for Post

- 2025 California, using Alternative Fixed Cost Assumptions (millions of 2011$)

....................... 7
Table A7

- 9. Summary of Total Control Costs (Known and Extrapolated) by Alternative Level for 2025

- U.S. using Alternative Cost Assumption for Extrapolated Costs, except California (millions of 2011$) a

................................ ................................ ................. 7
Table A7

- 10. Summary of Total Control Costs (Known and Extrapolated) by Alternative Level for 2025

- U.S. using Alternative Cost Assumption for Extrapolated Costs, except California (millions of 2011$) a

................................ ................................ ................. 8
Table 8

- 1. Total Costs, Total Monetized Benefits, and Net Benefits in 2025 for U.S., except California (billions of 2011$)

................................ ................................ ................... 3
Table 8

- 2. Total Costs, Total Monetized Benefits, and Net Benefits, Post

- 2025 for California (billions of 2011$)

................................ ................................ .............................. 3
Table 8

- 3. Human Health Effects of Pollutants Potentially Affected by Strategies to Attain the Primary Ozone Standards

................................ ................................ .................... 4
Table 8

- 4. Relevan t Factors and Their Potential Implications for Attainment

...................... 10***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xx Table 9

- 1. Demographic Attributes of CBSAs with One or More Monitors Exceeding Alternative Levels of the Primary Ozone Standards

................................ ............................ 6
Table 9

- 2. Age Distribution and Socioeconomic Attributes of CB SAs with One or More Monitors Exceeding Alternative Levels of the Primary Ozone Standards

.......................... 6
Table 10

- 1. Summary of Direct Labor Impacts for SCR installation at EGUs

........................ 11
Table 10

- 2. Key Assumptions in Labor Analysis for EGUs

................................ .................... 12
Table 10

- 3. Summary of Direct Labor Impacts for ICI Boilers

................................ ............... 14
Table 10

- 4. Estimated Direct Labor Impacts for SNCR Applied to Mid

- Sized Cement Kilns (125

- 208 tons clinker/hr)

................................ ................................ .......................... 15***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review***

xxi22