alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,524
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      348
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,842
<PP&E>                                         234,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                 113,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,890
<BONDS>                                        145,346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,455
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,144
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,996)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (20.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (20.42)


</TABLE>
RIVERCREEK PRESERVE, 

LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED 

LIABILITY COMPANY, 

WILLIAM E. GLENN AND 

PATRICIA W. GLENN,

Appellants,

v.

AMERIS BANK,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1568

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 8, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Victor Lawson Hulslander, Judge.

Stephen C. Bullock, Lake City; Steven R. Browning, Jacksonville; and William H. 

Rogner, Winter Park, for Appellants.

Frederick R. Brock, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellants’ response to the Court’s order of May 6, 

2014, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not one which 

determines jurisdiction of the person. Cf. Keehn v. Joseph C. Mackey and Co., 

420 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction to 
review the order by appeal. Moreover, we decline appellants’ suggestion that we 

undertake certiorari review, concluding that appellants have failed to demonstrate 

entitlement to such relief. Belair v. Drew, 770 So. 2d 1164, 1166 (Fla. 2000). 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

BENTON, CLARK, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.

2
Exhibit 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                             ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY
                      Computation of Net Earnings Per Share
                  Years Ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994

                (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                                 1996      1995      1994
PRIMARY:
<S>                                                            <C>        <C>       <C>    
Net earnings ...............................................   $62,744    52,651    44,068

Weighted average shares outstanding ........................    27,786    27,715    28,031
Add:
    Net additional shares from the assumed exercise
      of stock options .....................................       427       134        11


Weighted average shares outstanding including common
      stock equivalents ....................................    28,213    27,849    28,042


Net earnings per share .....................................   $  2.22      1.89      1.57



FULLY-DILUTED:

Net earnings ...............................................   $62,744    52,651    44,068

Add:
    Interest expense on convertible subordinated debentures,
      net of tax benefit ...................................     3,635       783      --

Adjusted net earnings ......................................   $66,379    53,434    44,068

Weighted average shares outstanding ........................    27,786    27,715    28,031

Add:
    Net additional shares from the assumed exercise
      of stock options .....................................       513       184        50

    Weighted average shares from the assumed conversion
      of the subordinated debentures .......................     3,089       677      --

Weighted average shares outstanding including common
      stock equivalents ....................................    31,388    28,576    28,081


Net earnings per share .....................................   $  2.11      1.87      1.57
</TABLE>
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC DOCKET NO. 

XYZ CORP., 

 Respondent.

DIRECTION FOR REVIEW

Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 66(j) and 29 C.F.R. § 2200.92(a), the report of the Administration Law Judge 

is directed for review. A briefing order will follow.

COMMISSIONER

Dated:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10645]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur) 
come forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Ms. KAPTUR led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 118 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 118

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2018

   Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the printing of ``United States Capitol Grounds: Landscape 
 Architect Frederick Law Olmstead's Design for Democracy'' as a House 
                               document.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. UNITED STATES CAPITOL GROUNDS: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FREDERICK 
              LAW OLMSTEAD'S DESIGN FOR DEMOCRACY.

    (a) Printing as House Document.--The book entitled ``United States 
Capitol Grounds: Landscape Architect Frederick Law Olmstead's Design 
for Democracy'', 

              

prepared by the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, shall be 
printed as a House document under the direction of the Joint Committee 
on Printing.
    (b) Style; Binding.--The book described in subsection (a) shall be 
printed in such style, form, and manner and with such binding as the 
Joint Committee on Printing may direct, in consultation with the Clerk 
of the House of Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate.
    (c) Number of Copies.--In addition to the usual number of copies, 
there shall be printed for the use of the Architect of the Capitol the 
lesser of--
            (1) 5,000 copies of the book printed under this section; or
            (2) such number of copies of the book as does not exceed a 
        total production and printing cost of $400,000.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 11290 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:14

- cv - 00186

- GAP , Bkcy No. 6:13

- bk

- 09954

- CCJ

In re: KIMBERLEY COLETTE NEMCIK , Debtor.

_____________________ _______________________________ BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus KIMBERLEY COLETTE NEMCIK , Defendant

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District o f Florida

________________________ ( September 3, 2014 ) Case: 14-11290 Date Filed: 09/03/2014 Page: 1 of 32 Before MARCUS, MARTIN, and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Bank of America appeals from the district court’s order affirming an order from the bankruptcy court voiding Bank of America’s lien on Kimberley Nemcik’s property in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding she initiated

. Nemcik’s property was subject to two mortgage liens at the time s he filed for bankruptcy. The debt owed on the first mortgage exceeded the fair market value of the property. Because the debt secured by the first lien exceeded the value of the property, Bank of America’s junior lien was considered to be wholly “underwater.” This being the

case , Nemcik moved the bankruptcy court to “strip off” or “void”

— that is, extinguish in its entirety

— Bank of America’ s lien

. Bank of America’s response to Nemcik’s motion acknowledged that under binding Eleventh Circuit precedent holding that a wholly underwater junior lien is voidable, the motion should be granted. See Folendore v. U.S. Small Bus. Admin

. , 862 F.2d 1537, 1538

– 39 (11th Cir. 1989); see also McNeal v. GMAC Mortg.,
LLC , 735 F.3d 1263, 1265

– 66 (11th Cir. 2012) (per curiam)

. For that reason, the bankruptcy court granted Nemcik’s motion. Bank of America appealed to the district court, but moved for summary affirmance in light of this Court’s binding precedent. The district court granted the motion, and Bank of America now seeks

Case: 14-11290 Date Filed: 09/03/2014 Page: 2 of 33 the appellate review that its motion for summary affirmance was intended to expedite. Bank of America maintains that Folendore and McNeal should be overturned in light of Dew s nup v. Timm , 502 U.S. 410, 112 S. Ct. 773 (1992), which held that a chapter 7 debtor could not “strip down” a creditor’s lien on real property where the value of the property is less than what is due to be paid to the creditor

. Id. at 417, 112 S. Ct. at 778. But in McNeal , we reaffirmed Folendore despite the holding in Dewsnup

. McNeal , 735 F.3d at 1265

– 66. A s Bank of America concedes, we are bound as a panel to follow our Court’s decision i n McNeal

. We therefore AFFIRM

.

Case: 14-11290 Date Filed: 09/03/2014 Page: 3 of 3
#### STATE v. JOHN E. HAMPTON.

*Indictment*— Selling *Liquor— Construction of Statute*— Jurisdiction.

1. The Act of 1S74 — ”/5, oh. 120, making it indictable to sell liquor, &c., “within three miles of the located line of the Asheville & Spartanburg R. R., during the construction of the said road,” applies only to that *t*part of the road actually undergoing construction; *Therefore,*where a defendant was indicted un ler this act, and the jury found specially that ho sold liquor within two miles of the *located*line, but that the road had never been in *process of eonsti notion*within seven miles of the place of sale ; *Held,*that he was not guilty.

2. A misdemeanor punishable “by fine of notless than ten nor more than fifty dollars, or by imprisonment of not less than ten days,” is not within the jurisdiction of a Justice of the Peace.

INDICTMENT for a Misdemeanor, triéd at Spring Term, 1877, of Buncombe Superior Court, before *Funches, J.*

The defendant was indicted for selling liquor in violation of Laws 1874-’75, eh. 126 : Sec. 1. “That it shall be unlawful for any person or persons to sell or in any manner give away any intoxicating liquors, or either directly or indirectly receive any compensation for the same, within three miles of the located line of the Asheville and Spartanburg Railroad during the construction of the said road.

Sec. 2. “Any person violating the provisions of this Act shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction before any Justice of the Peace, shall be punished by a fine notless than ten dollars or more than fifty dollars, or by imprisonment of not less than ten days.”

It was found by a special verdict that the defendant sold liquor in Asheville ; that the line of said Railroad ’was located two miles south of Asheville ; and that the Road had never been in process of construction within seven miles of the place of selling the liquor. Thereupon the Court held *527that the defendant was guilty. Judgment. Appeal by defendant.

*Attorney General,*for the State.

*Messrs. A. T. $ T. F. Davidson*and *J. FI. Merrimon,*for the defendant.

Eaibuloth, J.

This case turns on the Act of 1874-’75, ch. 126, making it unlawful for any person to sell any intoxicating liquors *“*within three miles of the located line of the Asheville and Spartanburg Railroad, during the construction of the said road.”

The defendant sold liquor within three miles of the “ located line,” but not within three miles of any part of it undergoing construction, which seems to be the proper interpretation ; especially as this view remedies the evil probably aimed at.

If the Legislature intended to give exclusive jurisdiction of this offence to a Justice of the Peace, they failed to do so, by not complying with' Art. IV. § 33 (now § 27) of the Constitution.

There is error. Let this be certified to the Superior Court of Buncombe County to the end that the defendant may be discharged.

Pee, Cueiaij. Judgment reversed.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Richard B. Abshire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Richard B. Abshire
 Richard B. Abshire
 Chief Financial Officer
 March 21, 2011
 
 
 
 This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 159/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 159 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6021 June 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 159

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6021 June 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1016 of 14 June 2017 amending Annexes II, III and IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for benzovindiflupyr, chlorantraniliprole, deltamethrin, ethofumesate, haloxyfop, Mild Pepino Mosaic Virus isolate VC1, Mild Pepino Mosaic Virus isolate VX1, oxathiapiprolin, penthiopyrad, pyraclostrobin, spirotetramat, sunflower oil, tolclofos-methyl and trinexapac in or on certain products (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1017 of 15 June 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials (
  1
  ) | 48 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1016 of 14 June 2017 amending Annexes II, III and IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for benzovindiflupyr, chlorantraniliprole, deltamethrin, ethofumesate, haloxyfop, Mild Pepino Mosaic Virus isolate VC1, Mild Pepino Mosaic Virus isolate VX1, oxathiapiprolin, penthiopyrad, pyraclostrobin, spirotetramat, sunflower oil, tolclofos-methyl and trinexapac in or on certain products (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1017 of 15 June 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials (
  1
  )

1

48

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on November 30, 2022
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
16-1713
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

2
16-1813
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

3
16-1872
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

4
17-0023
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

5
17-0279
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

 6
18-0242
Onekey, LLC
02/05/21
DFR
02/18/21
Closed

 7 
18-0731
UHS of Delaware, Inc. and Premier Behavioral Health Solutions of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Suncoast Behavioral Health Center
05/19/21
DFR
05/21/21
Closed

 8
18-1287
First Marine, LLC
05/19/21
DFR
05/27/21
Closed

 9
18-1288
First Marine, LLC
05/19/21
DFR
05/27/21
Closed

10
18-0701
Midvale Paper Box Company, Inc.
10/21/21
DFR
11/09/21
Closed

11
20-0762
CentiMark Corporation
10/27/21
DFR
11/09/21
Closed

12
20-0653
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
10/28/21
DFR
11/05/21
Closed

13
19-0622
Anthony Marano Co.
02/10/22
DFR
02/16/22
Closed

14
20-0541
Harvey Builders d/b/a Harvey Cleary Builders
03/03/22
DFR
03/11/22
Closed

15
19-0550
UHS of Denver, Inc., d/b/a Highlands Behavioral Health System
03/31/22
DFR
04/06/22
Closed

16
21-0432
Ariana Murrell-Rosario d/b/a Liberty Tax Service
07/01/22
DFR
07/13/22
Closed

17
20-1212
Roy Rock, LLC
07/14/22
DFR
07/15/22
Closed

18
20-0232
U.S. Ceiling Corp.
09/29/22
DFR
10/05/22
Open

19
21-0794
U.S. Postal Service – Canovanas Post Office
11/16/22
DFR
11/18/22
Open

20
17-0949
Walmart, Inc.
11/28/22
REM



 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-087-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
# L_2013134EN.01S00301.xml

| 18.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 134/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 134/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---