alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E14]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             INTRODUCTION OF THE CAPTIVE PRIMATE SAFETY ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. EARL BLUMENAUER

                               of oregon

                    in the house of representatives

                        Tuesday, January 6, 2009

  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Madam Speaker, today I am introducing a bill to 
prohibit interstate commerce in nonhuman primates as pets. The Captive 
Primate Safety Act, CPSA, would amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 
to treat nonhuman primates as prohibited wildlife species under that 
Act and to make corrections in the provisions relating to captive 
wildlife offenses under that Act.
  Nonhuman primates kept as pets pose serious risks to public health 
and safety. They can transmit diseases and inflict serious physical 
harm. These risks are increased by interstate transport of the animals. 
Currently, twenty states prohibit keeping primates as pets, and many 
others require a permit. Even in states where it is legal to keep 
primates, most people cannot provide the special care, housing, and 
social structure these animals require.
  Although the importation of nonhuman primates into the United States 
for the pet trade has been banned by Federal regulation since 1975, 
these animals are bred in the United States and are readily available 
for purchase from exotic animal dealers and even over the Internet. 
Because of the importation laws, there remains an active domestic trade 
in these animals.
  The CPSA would amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to add nonhuman 
primates to the list of animals that cannot be transported across state 
lines. It would prohibit the import, export, transportation, sale, 
receipt, acquisition, or purchase in interstate or foreign commerce of 
nonhuman primates in order to safeguard public health and safety and 
protect the welfare of monkeys, apes (which include chimpanzees and 
orangutans), marmosets and lemurs. The bill is similar to the Captive 
Wildlife Safety Act, CWSA, which Congress passed in 2003 to ban 
interstate commerce in lions, tigers, and other big cats for the pet 
trade.
  The CPSA would not affect trade or transportation of animals for 
zoos, research facilities, or other federally licensed and regulated 
entities. In the 110th Congress, the CPSA received strong support in 
the 110th Congress from Dr. Jane Goodall, the American Veterinary 
Medical Association, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, and The 
Humane Society of the United States. It easily passed the House of 
Representatives.
  I look forward to working with my colleagues to advance this bi-
partisan legislation.

                          ____________________
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-20231

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHIRLEY THIBODEAUX,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CR-541-1 

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shirley Thibodeaux appeals her sentence imposed on a guiltyplea conviction for fraud in connection with identification

documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7), (b)(1)(D),

(c)(3)(A). Thibodeaux argues that the district court erred in

imposing a 12-level adjustment because the loss attributed to

Thibodeaux exceeded $200,000, a two-level adjustment because the

offense involved more than 10 but fewer than 50 victims, and a

two-level adjustment because Thibodeaux used one means of
No. 04-20231

-2-

identification to unlawfully obtain another means of

identification. See U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(1)(G), (b)(2)(A),

(b)(9)(C)(i)(Nov. 2002). 

For the first time on appeal, Thibodeaux argues that these

sentencing adjustments were unconstitutional under Blakely v.

Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). As Thibodeaux concedes, her

Blakely argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in United

States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 473 (5th Cir. 2004), petition

for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263). Accordingly,

Thibodeaux’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 491 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 491

   Designating June 12, 2016, as a national day of racial amity and 
                            reconciliation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2016

  Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Burr, and Mr. 
Grassley) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating June 12, 2016, as a national day of racial amity and 
                            reconciliation.

Whereas the greatest asset of the United States is the people of the United 
        States;
Whereas the motto on the Great Seal of the United States is E Pluribus Unum, 
        ``out of many, one'';
Whereas the United States is comprised of multicultural, multiethnic, and 
        multiracial people;
Whereas friendship, collegiality, civility, respect, and kindness are commonly 
        shared ideals of the people of the United States; and
Whereas organizations and communities across the United States, motivated by the 
        ideals behind the motto of E Pluribus Unum, have joined together in 
        introspection and reflection on how the diversity of the people of the 
        United States has been indispensable in creating the United States: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates June 12, 2016, as a national day of racial 
        amity and reconciliation;
            (2) supports all people of the United States who join in 
        activities in support of the goals and ideals of racial amity; 
        and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 11

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     Quarter Ended     Quarter Ended
                                                     June 30, 2002     June 30, 2001
                                                     -------------     -------------
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>
Net Income                                              $ 70,866         $  4,446
                                                        ========         ========
Weighted average shares outstanding                      205,007          204,787

Reduction for common shares not yet released by
  Employee Stock Ownership Plan                            6,688            8,741
                                                        --------         --------
Total weighted average common shares
  outstanding for basic computation                      198,319          196,046
                                                        ========         ========
Basic earnings per share                                $    .36         $    .02
                                                        ========         ========
Total weighted average common shares
  outstanding for basic computation                      198,319          196,046

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
  effect of stock options                                  2,462            2,647
                                                        --------         --------
Total weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding for diluted computation        200,781          198,693
                                                        ========         ========
Diluted earnings per share                              $    .35         $    .02
                                                        ========         ========
</TABLE>


                                      -17-
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10648]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED

  As in executive session the Presiding Officer laid before the Senate 
messages from the President of the United States submitting sundry 
nominations which were referred to the appropriate committees.
  (The nominations received today are printed at the end of the Senate 
proceedings.)

                          ____________________
```
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1605/2004

of 14 September 2004         

amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1210/2004 for the 2004/2005 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 of 23 June 1995 laying down detailed implementing rules for the import of products in the sugar sector other than molasses (2), and in particular the second sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 1(2), and Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1423/95, as fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1210/2004 for the 2004/2005 marketing year are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 September 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 624/98 (OJ L 85, 20.3.1998, p. 5).

(3)OJ L 232, 1.7.2004, p. 11.

(4)OJ L 288, 8.9.2004, p. 10.

----

ANNEX

Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99  applicable from 15 September 2004

----

(1)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(2)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.I to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(3)  Fixed per 1 % sucrose content.

----
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cecil Bancorp, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report.4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
    5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Robert Lee Whitehead

Robert Lee Whitehead
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 Page 21
Conversion Notice, dated as of October 1, 2010



  
 Exhibit 10.55

 CONVERSION NOTICE 
 To: MECOX LANE LIMITED (the “Company”) 
 The undersigned, being a holder of Preference
Shares of the Company, hereby irrevocably (subject to the provisions of the next paragraph) instructs you to convert its Preference Shares into that certain amount of the Ordinary Shares of the Company in accordance with Article 7(ii)(d) of the
currently effective Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company, subject to and with effect immediately upon the completion of the Company’s initial public offering. 
 If (i) the Company does not intend to proceed with the Offering, (ii) the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Offering is withdrawn,
(iii) for any reason the Underwriting Agreement shall be terminated prior to the “time of purchase” (as defined in the Underwriting Agreement), or (iv) if the Offering is not completed by January 31, 2011, then in each such
case, this conversion notice shall be deemed to be revoked and the undersigned shall continue to hold all of its Preference Shares. 

Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the currently effective Memorandum and
Articles of Association of the Company. 
 (Signature page to follow) 







  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
have executed or have caused to be executed, this Conversion Notice on October 1, 2010. 
  

			
	MAXPRO HOLDINGS LIMITED
		
	By:	 	/s/ Neil Nanpeng Shen
	Name:	 	Neil Nanpeng Shen
	Title:	 	Authorized Representative
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7287
MELVIN DOUGLAS BERROW, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:05-cv-00019-JAB) Submitted: January 28, 2008 Decided: February 7, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Douglas Berrow, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Melvin Douglas Berrow moves for a certificate of appealability, seeking to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Berrow has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
----

(2004/C 88 E/0736)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0901/04

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(24 March 2004)

Subject:   The treatment of animals in livestock markets

Could the Commission please advise what infringement proceedings under Article 226 of the Treaty have been initiated against Member States with regard to inadequate implementation of EU legal provisions on animal welfare?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(22 April 2004)

The treatment of animals in livestock markets is only governed by Community Law currently in force to the extent that it falls within Council Directive 91/628/EEC of 19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during transport (1) as amended by Directive 95/29/EC (2).

Transport of the animals to, and unloading them at, the market would be covered if the journey to the market was more than 50 kilometres but once the animals pass out of the control of the transporter the Directive does not deal with their situation until loading for the journey from the market commences.

The Commission's proposal for a new Regulation on the protection of transported animals aims, in particular, to extend the protection afforded by Community Law to animals at markets. Personnel handling animals at markets would have to receive the necessary training. Livestock market operators would be responsible for ensuring that the welfare of the animals was respected during their stay at the market including during loading and unloading. Market operators would also be responsible for the introduction and monitoring of the appropriate procedures to ensure respect of the relevant rules on their premises.

Infringement proceedings were opened against Belgium in the year 2000 in connection (inter alia) with serious animal welfare deficiencies in relation to loading and unloading of animals at a livestock market.

Following further incidents, Belgium modified its legislation and adopted strict enforcement procedures including prosecution of those alleged to be responsible for some of the incidents. Following reports of the Commission's Food and Veterinary Office (FVO), which indicated an improved situation, the Commission subsequently decided not to proceed further with the infringement action.

Other incidents concerning alleged mistreatment of animals in markets in some other Member States have also been brought to the attention of the Commission in recent years but following the intervention of the Commission's services, action was in most cases taken to improve the situation. It was not considered necessary to open infringement proceedings in relation to these incidents.

In relation to the Commission's general position on initiation of infringement proceedings in relation to breaches of Community animal welfare legislation, the Honourable Member is referred to the answer given to written question E-2884/02 of Mr Erik Meijer on 20 November 2002 (3).

----

(1)OJ L 340, 11.12.1991.

(2)OJ L 148, 30.6.1995.

(3)OJ C 155 E, 3.7.2003.

----
----

----

----

**PRELIMINARY      STATEMENT**

**DESIGNATION**

**ARTICLE      I**

**DEFINITIONS**

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

**ARTICLE      II**

**SERIES      2007-1 COLLECTIONS**

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

**ARTICLE      III**

**RAPID      AMORTIZATION EVENTS**

**ARTICLE      IV**

**FORM      OF SERIES 2007-1 NOTES**

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

**ARTICLE      V**

**GENERAL**

* *

----

| Exhibit                A-1: | Form                of Restricted Global Series 2007-1 Note                                                                                                                          |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Exhibit                A-2: | Form                of Temporary Global Series 2007-1 Note                                                                                                                           |
| Exhibit                A-3: | Form                of Permanent Global Series 2007-1 Note                                                                                                                           |
| Exhibit                B:   | Form                of Clearing System Certificate                                                                                                                                   |
| Exhibit                C:   | Form                of Certificate of Beneficial Ownership                                                                                                                           |
| Exhibit                D-1: | Form                of Transfer Certificate for Exchange or Transfer from Restricted                Global                Series 2007-1 Note to Temporary Global Series 2007-1 Note  |
| Exhibit                D-2: | Form                of Transfer Certificate for Exchange or Transfer from Restricted                Global                Series 2007-1 Note to Permanent Global Series 2007-1 Note  |
| Exhibit                D-3: | Form                of Transfer Certificate for Exchange or Transfer from Temporary Global                Series 2007-1 Note to Restricted Global Series 2007-1 Note                 |
| Exhibit                E:   | Form                of Monthly Noteholders’ Statement                                                                                                                          |

**THIS      SERIES SUPPLEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN      ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.**

----

----

----

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.4 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation for the quarter ended June 30,
2004, I, J. Tracy Mey, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Indiantown
Cogeneration Funding Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, that:  (1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation. August 12, 2004
    /s/ J. TRACY MEYJ. Tracy MeyController and Chief Accounting Officer
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation and will be retained by
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request