alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130197.en1.txt[6/4/2013 7:53:06 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0197 Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 4/9/2013 ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ REC
: SUBMITTER: The Dow Chemical Companyfile:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130197.en1.txt[6/4/2013 7:53:06 AM] SAT (concerns) (01/18/2013): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox: Analogs: Migration to groundwater: Moderate PBT rating: P2B1T2 . Health: 2-3 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 20.00 ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130197.en1.txt[6/4/2013 7:53:06 AM] None. EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0197 Use: Number of Sites/ Location: 1 Days/yr: 159

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Air or Incineration or Landfill Output 2: 9.5E-1 kg/site-day over 53 days/yr from 1 site or 5.0E+1 kg/yr

Incineration Output 2: 1.9E+0 kg/site-day over 53 days/yr from 1 site or 10.0E+1 kg/yrfile:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130197.en1.txt[6/4/2013 7:53:06 AM] RELEASE TOTAL 1.5E+2 kg/yr - all sites OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 3
Inhalation: Exposure to Particulate (Class I) Upper Bound: 1.5E+2 mg/day over 53 days/yr Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: 3

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW 1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit or data not specific to industry): Yes 2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? Yes OR b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? 2-3 Yes Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? Yes (both criteria met) Dermal: Exposure to Solid at 100.00% concentration High End: 3.1E+3 mg/day over 53 days/yr Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 3

CBI: Yes MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION CALL BY: M El-Zoobi Organization: epa CALL TO: Imogene Treblefile:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130197.en1.txt[6/4/2013 7:53:06 AM] Organization: Date: 03/12/2013 Time: 2:30 Concerning what TSCA CBI? PMN: 13-0197

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION CALL BY: M El-Zoobi Organization: epa CALL TO: Imogene Treble
Date: 03/19/2013 Time: 11 Concerning what TSCA CBI? PMN: 13-0197file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130197.en1.txt[6/4/2013 7:53:06 AM]
Order entered July 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00297-CR

KIRK STEVEN JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-70153-Y

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s July 9, 2015 amended motion for extension of time to 

file the State’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### Derfus, Administratrix, Respondent, vs. Stoelting Brothers Company, Appellant.

*November 10*

December *8, 1936.*

*206For the appellant there was a brief by *Nash & Nash,*and oral argument by *Walter J. Clark,*all of Manitowoc.

*207For the respondent there was a brief by *Sigmcm & Sigmam,*of Appleton, and oral argument by *Abraham Sigman.*

Fairchild, J.

The appellant received the right to manufacture and market the machine. The contract fixed the obligations of the parties. A sufficient consideration was given. The relinquishment by one party of a right to manufacture and sell a patented device, in consideration of another party’s promise to pay money therefor, amply meets all requirements in that particular. As the trial court found, Derfus gave up all right under his patent in exchange for the promise of appellant to pay a royalty on manufactured and sold machines and semiannually for a period of five years a minimum sum whether machines were made or sold or used or not.

Derfus was trying to perfect a machine to overcome difficulties resulting from cutting curd in a vat and then delivering it into a conventional curd mill. It appears by reference to the application for the patent that the common practice was first to cut the curd by hand within the vat and shovel it into a mill, generally placed on top of the vat. As the curd passed through the mill, it was again discharged into the vat, there to be mixed. This method of cutting and working the curd required hard work, and frequently resulted in crushing or breaking up of the curd. The machine was put in operation in several cheese factories and the operation was witnessed by appellant. The lack of perfection was apparent, but it performed well enough to interest appellant and to breed a hope of further improvement. As found by the court, Derfus’ statement that he would perfect the machine was not a misrepresentation. *Miranovits v. Gee,*163 Wis. 246, 157 N. W. 790; *Karls v. Drake,*168 Wis. 372, 170 N. W. 248; *Graff v. Tinkham,*202 Wis. 141, 231 N. W. 593. All knew the existing conditions. All knew *208he had been able to accomplish but partially his objective. Five years were set apart as a period during which he was to- be paid $400 per year whether any machines were manufactured or sold. After that period, his revenue depended solely on sales of machines. Efforts to improve the machine for the benefit of both parties are consistent with this understanding of the contract. The evidence is that Derfus had an intention not only to attempt, but to- accomplish, an improvement. Pie had the theory that one machine could perform the functions of cutting and mixing. He was trying to perfect it. His failure to do- so up to the time of his death leaves the appellant with its rights to the machine, but also liable for payments provided for by the contract.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      1,912,441
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      2,913,960
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 1,783,966
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      3,385,750
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        3,385,750
<LOANS>                                    53,962,286
<ALLOWANCE>                                   194,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             67,071,779
<DEPOSITS>                                 56,133,639
<SHORT-TERM>                                1,750,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           409,768
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        4,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,591,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             67,071,779
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             1,169,550
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              68,536
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               46,424
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            1,284,510
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            608,651
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            639,675
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         644,835
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  22,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               117,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               243,843
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    243,843  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  160,163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.13
<LOANS-NON>                                   368,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                  210,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              174,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   8,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    7,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             195,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          195,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

 

| **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of our reports dated February 23, 2009, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of Alexander’s, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alexander’s, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008:  

Registration Statement No. 333-151721 on Form S-8  

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-155727 on Form S-3

 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Parsippany, New Jersey

February 23, 2009
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10820]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  (Ms. KAPTUR addressed the House. Her remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.)

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1033091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2234927
<ALLOWANCES>                                     18438
<INVENTORY>                                     140951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3511713
<PP&E>                                         1987892
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1804559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4410089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1265933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          1500000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        488183
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4410089
<SALES>                                        8873887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8873887
<CGS>                                          6864579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2865833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 891
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (811986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (811986)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (811986)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (811986)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (811986)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walker C. Tompkins, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/Walker C. Tompkins, Jr.
Name:  Walker C. Tompkins, Jr.
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 31, 2003
# Official Journal C 344/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.344.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 344 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5512 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.344.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 344

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5512 November 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2012/C 344/01 | Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2011, together with the institutions’ replies | 1 |
| 2012/C 344/02 | Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2011, together with the Commission's replies | 243 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Auditors

2012/C 344/01

Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2011, together with the institutions’ replies

1

2012/C 344/02

Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2011, together with the Commission's replies

243

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
exv10w60






Exhibit 10.60




NAVISITE, INC.

SUMMARY OF FY 2011 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT BONUS PROGRAM




     On July 6, 2010, the Governance, Nominating and Compensation Committee (the “GNC Committee”)
of the Board of Directors of NaviSite, Inc. (the “Company”) established the NaviSite, Inc. FY 2011
Executive Management Bonus Program, creating target cash bonuses for the Company’s 2011 fiscal year
for the executive officers of the Company.



     The award of a cash bonus to any executive officer pursuant to this program is subject to the
achievement of certain targets for fiscal year 2011, including bookings of new contract value,
EBITDA for the Company and individual performance objectives. EBITDA, for purposes of this bonus
program, is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, excluding
impairment costs, stock-based compensation, severance, costs related to discontinued operations,
and other non-operational charges.



     The bonus which would be made if the targets are met, for each of the principal executive
officers and the principal financial officer, is set forth below:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Target Bonus
	Arthur P. Becker
	 	$	262,500	 
	R. Brooks Borcherding
	 	$	235,000	 
	James W. Pluntze
	 	$	125,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<CIK>                      0000927632
<NAME>                     INDIANTOWN COGENERATION, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                         27,270,564
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,331,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,172,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               43,682,698
<PP&E>                                         631,980,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                 76,744,786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 708,728,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          39,897,734
<BONDS>                                        585,485,433
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   708,728,671
<SALES>                                        134,012,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,012,839
<CGS>                                          67,459,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  75,998,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,539,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             42,807,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                16,788,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      920,536
<NET-INCOME>                                   17,709,267
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 302/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 302 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6013 September 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 302

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6013 September 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 302/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2017/C 302/02 | Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 October 2017(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 ( OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1 )) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 302/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2017/C 302/02

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 October 2017(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 ( OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1 ))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 ( OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1 ))

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 302/03 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 3 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2017/C 302/03

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant, 

v.	 OSHRC Docket No. 10-0264 

NOVA GROUP/TUTOR-SALIBA, A JOINT 

VENTURE, 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE 

The Commission requests that the parties brief the following issues. 

(1)	 Do the circumstances of this case warrant remand and reassignment to a different 

administrative law judge for rehearing, as requested by the Respondent? In 

discussing this issue, the parties should address the timing and form of the 

Respondent’s request for relief under Commission Rule 68(b), 29 C.F.R. 

§ 2200.68(b), and 5 U.S.C. § 556(b). 

(2)	 In the event the case is not remanded for a rehearing, does the record support the 

judge’s decision to affirm a serious violation of 29 C.F.R. § 1926.250(a)(1)? 

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing 

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of 

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate. 
 

 

 

 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: February 8, 2011	 _/s/_______________________________ 

Ray H. Darling, Jr. 

Executive Secretary 

2
#### The State *v.*Joseph Gregory.

From Wilkes.

®n the trial of an indictment for perjury, charged to have been committed in an oath taken before a company .court-martial, i\ is not necessary to produce the commission of the Captain : parol proof of his acting as such is sufficient.

The Defendant was indicted for perjury, charged to ,have been committed in an oath taken before a company court-martial, for the purpose of getting a fine remitted. On the trial a question arose, Whether the commission of the senior officer of the Court ought not to'be produced, to prove his grade as an officer and tiiat the court was legally constituted ? Tiie presiding Judge thought that it was not necessary to produce the commission, and received parol proof of the grade of the officers and of the constitution of tiie court. The question being sent to this Court, it was decided

By the Couiit

That it was not necessary to produce the commission of the Captain : that parol proof of his acting as such was sufficient.*

*

 The Solicitor for the State relied upon 4 Hawk. 432, Title *Evidence*— and 2 M’Nally 485 to 488, and the authorities there cited.