alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 36 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 

Soap Box Derby. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2017 

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BEYER, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mrs. COMSTOCK, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. DELANEY, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. RASKIN) 

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

4 DERBY RACES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

6 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

7 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 

8 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

9 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 36 IH 

1 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

2 June 17, 2017, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

3 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

4 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

5 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

7 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

8 Board, the event shall be— 

9 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

10 public; and 

11 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

12 Congress. 

13 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

14 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

15 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

16 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

17 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap18 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

19 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

20 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

21 for the event. 

22 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

23 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

24 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange25 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 36 IH 

1 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

4 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise5 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

6 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

7 Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States Department of Agriculture

About NRCS | Careers | National Centers | State Websites

Browse By Audience | A-Z Index | Advanced Search | Help

You are Here: Home / Cover crops improve soil health, help farmers weather drought

Cover crops improve soil health, help farmers weather drought

By Jody Christiansen and Ciji Taylor

NRCS Public Affairs

With assistance from the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service, farmers and ranchers across the nation 

are using cover crops to protect soil – their most valuable asset, especially with many facing drought conditions 

again this year.

“Producers are beginning to see great value in cover crops,” Eric McTaggart NRCS district conservationist for 

Livingston County, Ill., said.

Cover crops help improve soil health by reducing erosion, increasing soil organic matter content, improving air and 

water movement through soil, reducing soil compaction, capturing and recycling nutrients in the soil profile and 

managing soil moisture to promote biological nitrogen fixation. Several farmers and ranchers using cover crops saw 

increases in yields during extreme drought.

“I read an article about cover crops a couple of years ago and thought I’d give it a try,” Illinois farmer Daniel 

Steidinger, said.

Using radishes as a cover crop, Steidinger successfully increased water infiltration in areas where water previously 

flowed across the field. The radish root depth aerated the area enough to pull water further down into the soil 

profile instead of letting it run off the surface.

“There was a 100-bushel difference in my field with cover crops, and in a drought like we had, that just speaks for 

itself,” he added.

Nearby farmers, Danny and Kevin Harms, planted annual rye grass. This cover crop grows roots as deep as 40 

inches.

“We wanted something to pull nutrients up from deep down and bring them closer to the surface,” said Danny. With 

its thick, fibrous roots, annual ryegrass does that and more, helping with compaction, water infiltration and nitrogen 

sequestration.

Farmers and ranchers can plant several different types of cover crops. The species of cover crop selected along with 

its management determine the benefits and returns.

“NRCS works with producers to determine what specific issues or needs their operation faces, and we help them 

select the ideal cover crop species or mix that addresses those needs,” said McTaggart.

Cover crops are just one conservation practice that can help mitigate drought impacts. Visit us at 

www.nrcs.usda.gov for Drought Mondays and explore more ways to make your lands more resilient to drought.

Read more drought information

NRCS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Civil Rights | FOIA | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Policy| Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | Whitehouse.gov | 

Skip

Natural Resources Conservation Service 

Stay Connected

Topics Programs Newsroom Contact Us

Cover crops improve soil health, help farmers weather drought | NRCS Page 1 of 1

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/home/?cid=STELPRDB1083051 1/30/2015
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10876]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, proceedings 
will resume on questions previously postponed.
  Votes will be taken in the following order: ordering the previous 
question on House Resolution 1533, by the yeas and nays; adoption of 
House Resolution 1533, if ordered; approval of the Journal, de novo.
  This first electronic vote will be conducted as a 15-minute vote. 
Remaining electronic votes will be conducted as 5-minute votes.

                          ____________________
```
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for September 2019

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month					18

2. Cases Added to Docket						 1

Steven S. Moalemi, M.D., P.C., 
d/b/a Empire Physical Medicine and Pain Management
No. 19-0142 
Direction for Review September 26, 2019


  
3. Cases Subtracted From Docket					 0



4. Total Cases Pending End of Month					19
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walter S. Berman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


/s/ Walter S. Berman
----------------------------------
Name:  Walter S. Berman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 24, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under
that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and
specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NO. 07-00-0488-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	AUGUST 10, 2001

	______________________________

SUSAN KAYE HILL, 

								Appellant

v.

TEXAS REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,

								Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 125th DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

	NO. 98-26791; HON. JOHN COSELLI , PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ORDER ON APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

	________________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	Susan Kaye Hill, appellant, has moved to dismiss her appeal contending that the controversy is now moot.  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s personal request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

  								Brian Quinn 

           	                            				    Justice

Do not publish.ade, would significantly impair the children’s physical or emotional development?

	A: Yes. Å
No. 1072.

*W. A. Combs*for petitioner. *William C. Harvin*for respondent.

#### Quintero *v.*Sinclair Refining Co.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 113 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 

Soap Box Derby. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2018 

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

DELANEY, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. BEYER, Mr. SARBANES, and 

Mrs. COMSTOCK) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

4 DERBY RACES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

6 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

7 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 

8 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

9 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 113 IH 

1 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

2 June 16, 2018, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

3 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

4 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

5 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

7 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

8 Board, the event shall be— 

9 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

10 public; and 

11 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

12 Congress. 

13 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

14 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

15 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

16 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

17 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap18 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

19 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

20 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

21 for the event. 

22 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

23 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

24 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange25 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 113 IH 

1 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

4 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise5 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

6 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

7 Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21
                                ALEXANDER'S, INC.
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Alexander's of Brooklyn, Inc.
Alexander's Kings, LLC
Alexander's Kings Plaza, LLC
Alexander's Paramus, LLC
Alexander's of Rego Park II, Inc.
Alexander's of Rego Park III, Inc.
Alexander's of Flushing, Inc.
Alexander's Department Stores of New Jersey, Inc.
Alexander's Department Stores of Brooklyn, Inc.
Kings Parking, LLC
Ownreal Inc.
Sakraf Wine & Liquor Store, Inc.
Alexander's Personnel Providers, Inc.
Alexander's Rego Shopping Center Inc.
731 Commercial Holding LLC
731 Commercial LLC
731 Residential Holding LLC
731 Residential LLC
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for January 2020

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month					25

2. Cases Added to Docket						 0


  
3. Cases Subtracted From Docket					-2

Coleman Hammons Construction Co., Inc.
No. 17-0992 
Remand Order Issued January 23, 2020

Steven S. Moalemi, M.D., P.C., d/b/a Empire Physical 
Medicine and Pain Management
No. 19-0142
Remand Order Issued January 24, 2020



4. Total Cases Pending End of Month					23
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 33-75308, 33-45811, 333-105087,
333-81154, 333-34077 and 333-115271) on Form S-8 of our report on the consolidated financial statements of Bally Technologies, Inc. dated
November 2, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based
Paymentand the restatement of the consolidated financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005), and of our report
on internal control over financial reporting dated November 2, 2007 (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting
because of material weaknesses) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bally Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2007.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Las
Vegas, Nevada
November 2, 2007

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

31.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
         Officer of VOXEL pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
         Act of 2002

I, Michael Anthony, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of VOXEL;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: June 17, 2008


/s/ Michael Anthony
-----------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Michael Anthony
-----------------
Michael Anthony
Chief Financial Officer
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5


     AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL LETTER AGREEMENT

     This Amendment to Change of Control Letter Agreement, dated as of May 11,
2002 (this "Amendment"), by and between Polymer Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and Jerry Zucker ("Executive") amends that certain
letter agreement, dated May 22, 1998, between the Company and Executive (the
"Original Agreement"). Except as otherwise indicated herein, capitalized terms
used herein are defined in the Original Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto herby agree as follows:

1.   AMENDMENT TO ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. The Original Agreement is hereby amended
     to add thereto Section 8.5 as follows:

     8.5  If it is determined that any payments hereunder, either separately or
          in conjunction with any other payments, benefits and entitlements
          received by Executive hereunder, would constitute an "excess parachute
          payment" within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
          Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and thereby be subject to the
          excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (the "Excise Tax"),
          then in such event, PGI shall be obligated to pay to Executive
          promptly following such determination and upon notice thereof a
          "gross-up" payment in an amount equal to the amount of such Excise
          Tax, plus all federal and state income or other taxes with respect to
          the payment of the amount of such Excise Tax, including all such taxes
          (including any additional Excise Tax) with respect to any such
          gross-up payment.

2.   CONTINUING EFFECT OF ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. Except as expressly amended
     hereby, all of the provisions of the Original Agreement are ratified and
     confirmed and remain in full force and effect.

3.   GOVERNING LAW. All issues and questions concerning the construction,
     validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Amendment shall be
     governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of
     South Carolina, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of
     law rules or provisions (whether of the State of South Carolina or any
     other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any
     jurisdiction other than the State of South Carolina.

4.   COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in two or more
     counterparts (including by means of telecopied signature
     pages), any one of which need not contain the signatures of more than one
     party, but all such counterparts taken together shall constitute one and
     the same instrument.

Dated this 11th day of May, 2002.


POLYMER GROUP, INC.

By:___________________________                     _____________________________
Name: ________________________                     Jerry Zucker
Its: _________________________
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40871

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN BRISENO-NERIO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:12-CR-227-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Briseno-Niero

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Briseno-Niero has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 5, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-40871 Document: 00512164586 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/05/2013
No. 12-40871

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-40871 Document: 00512164586 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/05/2013
EXHIBIT 32.2 Certification Pursuant
To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Polymer Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James L. Schaeffer,
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge: (1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
0f 1934, as amended; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ James L.
  SchaefferJames L. SchaefferActing Chief Financial Officer*  August 12, 2003 * James G.
Boyd, the Companys Chief Financial Officer, was involved in an automobile
accident on May 8, 2003 and has been recovering since such date.


---