alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0 43 7 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 - CE - 0 36 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Exhibit 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT



Board of Directors

Airborne, Inc.

Seattle, Washington



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 333-83052, 333-55282, 33-3713, 33-39720, 33-51651, 33-58905, and 333-55687 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-88102 on Form S-3 of Airborne, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) of our report dated February 25, 2003
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in the Companys method of accounting for major engine overhaul costs), included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Airborne, Inc. and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP                               
|DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP March 14, 2003 Seattle, Washington
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant, 

v. OSHRC Docket No. 13-0224 

A.H. STURGILL ROOFING, INC.

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief all issues presented in the Respondent’s Petition for 

Discretionary Review, including, but not limited to: 

Whether an employer’s knowledge or lack of knowledge of its employees’ underlying 

health conditions or ages, and any legal restrictions upon the employer in obtaining such 

information, are relevant to the Secretary’s burden to establish a violation of the general 

duty clause in this case.

Whether the judge miscalculated the heat index on the day in question and, if so, whether 

the Secretary established the existence of a hazard even if the heat index remained in the 

lowest “caution” quadrant.

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate. 

 
Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing 

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of 

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: April 8, 2015 /s/ 

 John X. Cerveny 

 Executive Secretary 

2
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26699]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice: 2024-3093]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Agency Information 
Collection Activities: Submission to the Office of Management and 
Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; EIB 92-79, 
Commissioned Broker Application Form

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM), as a part 
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the 
proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 16, 2024 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB 92-79) or by mail to Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20038, Attn: OMB 
3048-0024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information, 
please contact Jennifer Krause, [email protected], 305.586.2022.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This form is used by insurance brokers to 
register with EXIM and by EXIM to make a determination of the 
eligibility of the broker to receive commission payments under Export-
Import Bank's credit insurance programs.
    The form can be viewed at: https://img.exim.gov/s3fs-public/pub/pending/eib92-79_2024_508.pdf.
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-79, Commissioned Broker Application 
Form.
    OMB Number: 3048-0024.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: This form is used by insurance brokers to register 
with EXIM. The form provides EXIM staff with the information necessary 
to make a determination of the eligibility of the broker to receive 
commission payments under Export Import Bank's credit insurance 
programs. Our customers will be able to submit this form on paper or 
electronically.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities engaged in brokering 
export credit insurance policies.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 3.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: As needed.

    Dated: November 12, 2024.
Andrew Smith,
Records Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-26699 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for February 2014

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 37

2. Cases Added to Docket 

The Davey Tree Expert Company

No. 12-1324

Direction for Review on 2/6/14

Envision Waste Services, LLC

No. 12-1600

Direction for Review on 2/10/14

2

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket

All Star Realty Co., Inc.

No. 12-1597

Decision on 2/3/14

-1

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 38
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 187 (Friday, December 12, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10974]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          RECESS UNTIL TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2008, AT 11 A.M.

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 
Senate stands in recess until 11 a.m. on Tuesday, December 16, 2008.
  Thereupon, the Senate, at 10 and 54 seconds a.m., recessed until 
Tuesday, December 16, 2008, at 11 a.m.
```
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03504

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
United States of America
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor
Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.
OSHRC Docket No. 17-0190
SHELLY & SANDS, INC.,

Respondent.


BRIEFING NOTICE

	The Commission requests that the parties brief the issues raised in the Respondent’s petition for discretionary review.  The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the Commission on review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review.  Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.
All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.[1]  The first brief is to be filed within 40 days of this notice.  A party that does not intend to file a brief must notify the Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties.  The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service.	
BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION



Dated:  May 10, 2018	    			 /s/						
					             John X. Cerveny
				                         Executive Secretary 
---------------------------
[1]
 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies.  The Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party.  Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 187 (Friday, December 12, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1323]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        House of Representatives

Chamber Action
  The House was not in session today. The House is scheduled to meet at 
11 a.m. on Saturday, January 3, 2009, pursuant to the provisions of H. 
Con. Res. 440.
```
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

 Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant, 

v. OSHRC Docket No. 09-1451 

ALL ERECTION & CRANE RENTAL CORP., 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE 

The Commission requests that the parties brief the following issues. 

(1) In affirming Citation 1, Item 4, did the judge err by concluding that the 

Secretary established Respondent’s failure to comply with the 

requirements of 29 C.F.R. § 1910.151(a)? 

(2) In affirming Citation 2, Item 1, did the judge err by concluding that 

Respondent was required to perform an asbestos survey in accordance 

with 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1001(j)(2)(i)? 

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1

 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing

 

1

 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate. 
2

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices 

ofintent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: April 27, 2011 /s/ 

 Ray H. Darling, Jr. 

 Executive Secretary
<PAGE>

32.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
        of VOXEL pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VOXEL (the "Company")
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael Anthony,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of VOXEL, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 17, 2008


                                    /s/ Michael Anthony
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Michael Anthony
                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                    /s/ Michael Anthony
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Michael Anthony
                                    Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E46]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           SITUATION IN GAZA

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. LEONARD L. BOSWELL

                                of iowa

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, January 8, 2009

  Mr. BOSWELL. Madam Speaker, I strongly support Israel's right to 
defend itself against the rocket attacks by Hamas--attacks which have 
killed and injured many Israeli citizens. Israel's actions are 
understandable. We must stand by our ally and be involved in any 
negotiations. I'm heartened to learn of a possible cease fire proposal. 
However, any cease fire must ensure an end to the terrorist attacks by 
Hamas.

                          ____________________
```
#### Stankiewicz, Respondent, vs. Hartland Farmers’ Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

*April 9*

May *12, 1931.*

*125For the appellant there was a brief by *Winter & Winter*of Shawano, and oral argument by *P. J. Winter.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Lehner & Lehner*of .Oconto Falls, and oral argument by *Philip Lehner*of Princeton.

Fowler, J.

The appellant assigns as error the conclusion of the court that the defendant is estopped from claiming the assignment of the policy was not consented to by the company.

The trial court’s conclusion was apparently based on *Spohn v. National Fire Ins. Co.*190 Wis. 446, 209 N. W. 725, which held that the company was estopped to deny that its consent to an assignment of a policy had been given when its agent had been requested to perfect the assignment and had told-the assignee that all the requisites necessary to perfect it had been complied with and he was fully protected. In that case the agent had authority to act for the company in consenting to the assignment. Here the agent in fact did not have such authority. This case is distinguishable in that respect.

However, the plaintiff sent the policy to one who was not only an agent but a director of the company with request to him in effect that the company take such action as was necessary to render the assignment effectual. The plaintiff lived remote from the home office of the company, if a town mutual company has a home office in view of the fact that it has no regular place of business unless the private residence of the president or secretary or perhaps any one of a half dozen or more others can be considered as such. The plaintiff was an ignorant man, unable to- read or write, unacquainted with the manner of transacting insurance business and not informed of any special limitations of the authority of the director to whom he sent the policy. He applied to *126the director to have done whatever was necessary to be done by the company to effectuate the insurance on his building and paid him the fee for having this done, himself not knowing what should be done or who should do it, but assuming that his request would be complied with and relied on the assurance given by the director that it had been complied with. Nearly three years of the term of insurance had yet to run. It was plainly the duty of the company upon the plaintiff’s application either to consent to the assignment of the policy or return to the plaintiff the unearned premium. Somebody had to act for the company upon the plaintiff’s application. We consider that a director of the company had apparent authority so to act. Apparent authority is equivalent to actual authority as far as persons dealing with the company are concerned, and under the rule of the *Spohn Case, supra,*the company is estopped to deny that its consent to the assignment was given.

*By the Court.*— The judgment is affirmed.
FILED 18-0330 4/10/2018 7:13 PM tex-23799647 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK I 

# ORIGINAL

IN THE MATTER OF



### G: CAUSE NO. 2016-01145J § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

## I/IL~D Chris

### O~el District <§erk 

### Nov 16**~0\6**



# -- § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

### MYiftSQtG\Htft'a oopl§y § § JUVENILE RESPONDENT § 313TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
ORDERWITHDRAWING, APPOINTING APPELLATE COUNSEL AND CONFIRMING JJNENILE RESPONDENT'S INDIGENCE On November 16, 2016, the court considered the motion for withdrawal, appointment of appellate counsel and confirmation ofindigence brought by the juvenile respondent, G R G , JR The Court after considering the evidence and arguments of counsel finds that good
cause 

### exists to permit Michael McLane to withdraw as thejuvenile respondent's attorney ofrecord and appoint appellate counsel. It 

### is therefore ORDERED, that, Michael McLane is withdrawn as thejuvenile respondent's attorney ofrecord. Further, the Court appoints DONALD M. CRANE appellate counsel for the juvenile
respondent and confirms that G.



## -- R ' G ! JR is indigent. The Court further ORDERS that the Harris County District Clerk and the Official Court Reporter ofthis court shall, upon request ofthe appellate counsel and at no cost to thejuvenile! respondent or appellate counsel, prepare and file with the Court ofAppeals the Clerk's Record and the Reporter's Record. 

### NOV 162016 NOV 

## 16 2016 SIGNED this

_____ day ofNovember, 2016.

Approved as to form only:

Isl Donald M. Crane Donald M. Crane, Attorney at Law 810 South Mason Road, Suite 350 Katy, Texas 77450 Telephone (713) 501-8529 Facsimile (281) 392-5383 State Bar No. 05005900 donmc5ane@gmail.com
AITORNEY AD LITEM ON APPEAL 

## runQfEPRESIDING
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 641 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-292, K2025-290.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26572 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P