alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States of America

**OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

**ANSWER**

**I, II, III**

Respondent admits Paragraphs I, II and III.

**IV**

Respondent denies Paragraph IV.

**V**

Respondent has insufficient information to either admit or deny the allegations at Paragraph V, and therefore denies the same.

**VI**

Respondent denies Paragraph VI.

**VII**

Respondent has insufficient information to either admit or deny the allegations at Paragraph VII, and therefore denies the same.

**VIII**

Respondent denies the allegations at Paragraph VIII.  The penalties are excessive under § 17(j) of the Act based upon the small size of the employer, which has only twelve employees, and the low gravity of the alleged violations.

**IX**

Respondent pleads the affirmative defense of “greater hazard” as to Citation 1, Item 3a.  Abatement of the violation alleged in Citation 1, Item 2 will increase the safety risk to employees.  Respondent also pleads the affirmative defense of “unpreventable employee misconduct” as to Citation 2, Item 2.  The alleged conditions were the result of unauthorized actions by certain employees which resulted in the conditions referred to in the alleged violations.

RESPONDENTBy _______________________AttorneyXYZ Corp.123 StreetCity, State Zip Code

**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**

**[Electronic filing].**

This is to certify that service of the Joint Notification of Settlement filed in the Commission’s E-File System was also simultaneous served by email attachment to the parties listed below on ______________________.

**[Self-Represented party exempt from electronic filing].**

This is to certify that a copy of the Joint Notification of Settlement was served by first class, postage prepaid, U.S. Mail to the parties listed below on ______________________.

*___/s/______________________*

Name     Title

Company / Firm Name / Office of the Solicitor

Street Address

City, State, Zip Code

Email Address

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      3,112,314
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      1,455,640
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              250,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                13,449,669
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      6,680,418
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        6,680,418
<LOANS>                                    87,452,950
<ALLOWANCE>                                   405,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            119,453,268
<DEPOSITS>                                 87,452,950
<SHORT-TERM>                                1,750,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           528,849
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        6,124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 10,690,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            119,453,268
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             1,649,432
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             122,653
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               68,903
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            1,860,988
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            900,192
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            970,517
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         890,471
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  22,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               205,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               294,528
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    294,528
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  205,135
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.60
<LOANS-NON>                                   824,421
<LOANS-PAST>                                  287,072
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              233,513
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  34,349
<RECOVERIES>                                    3,378
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             405,042
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          405,042
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0


</TABLE>
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Rachel Carson State Office Building 

P.O. Box 2063 

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 

December 7, 2007 

Secretary 717-787-2814 

Mr. Donald S . Welsh 

Regional Administrator 

EPA Region III (3APOO) 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Welsh: 

I am enclosing a demonstration showing how Pennsylvania has satisfied the "infrastructure" 

elements for State Implementation Plans (SIP) required under Sections 110(a)(2)(A) - (M) of the Clean 

Air Act (CAA) for the eight-hour ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.

s) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS) adopted in 1997. 

Those infrastructure elements that we have identified as either not already been addressed by 

currently SIP-approved or pending revisions, or that need updating are set forth in the document entitled 

State Implementation Plan Revision: Section 110(a)(2)(A) - (M) Requirementsfor Ozone and Fine. 

Particulates. We are hereby submitting this document for your approval as a SIP revision under 

Section 110 of the CAA. The SIP revision was available for a 30-day public comment period, and a 

public hearing was held on October 16,2007. No comments were received. Evidence of public 

notification is enclosed. These procedures meet the public participation requirements of the CAA and 

the Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act for a SIP revision. 

I am enclosing with this letter a table that identifies those infrastructure requirements that we 

believe are already contained in the SIP and that are applicable to both the eight-hour ozone and PM2.s 

NAAQS, as well as those infrastructure requirements applicable to the eight-hour ozone NAAQS that 

we believe are contained in SIP revisions which have been submitted to but not yet approved by EPA. 

The attainment and maintenance plans and the regulations cited in this table went through public notice 

and hearing prior to submittal to EPA. The table also identifies those infrastructure requirements that 

are not applicable to Pennsylvania. 

I am also submitting under separate cover a SIP revision that meets specific obligations under 

CAA Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i). 

Should you have any questions concerning the requested SIP revision, please contact Joyce E. 

Epps, Director, Bureau of Air Quality, bye-mail at jeepps@state.pa.us or by telephone at 717-787-9702. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosures 

An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.lIIs 

W 

Printed on Recycled Paper "\6<;9
# IMMC.EESC-2022-00297-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2022-00297-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

| OPINION |
| --- |
| European Economic and Social Committee |
| Maximum authorised dimensions and weights / road vehicles (codification) |
| _____________ |
| Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Union the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic (codification) [COM(2021) 769 final – 2021/0400 (COD)] |
| |
| TEN/768 |
| |
| |

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Maximum authorised dimensions and weights / road vehicles (codification)

_____________

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Union the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic (codification) [COM(2021) 769 final – 2021/0400 (COD)]

TEN/768

EN

Referral

| Referral | European Parliament, 13/12/2021


  Council of the European Union, 17/12/2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 91 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society |
| Adopted at plenary | 23/02/2022 |
| Plenary session No | 567 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 214/1/6 |

Referral

European Parliament, 13/12/2021

European Parliament, 13/12/2021

Council of the European Union, 17/12/2021

Council of the European Union, 17/12/2021

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 91 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 91 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

23/02/2022

23/02/2022

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

567

567

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

214/1/6

214/1/6

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 567th plenary session of 23 and 24 February 2022 (meeting of 23February), by 214 votes to 1 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 567th plenary session of 23 and 24 February 2022 (meeting of 23February), by 214 votes to 1 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Bruxelles, 23 February 2022

Bruxelles, 23 February 2022

Christa SCHWENG

Christa SCHWENG

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________

_____________
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 179 (Wednesday, November 26, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1293]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
  No committee meetings were held.
```
Exhibit 99.1Agreement Regarding Disclosure of Long-Term Debt InstrumentsIn reliance upon Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delawarelimited partnership (the “Partnership”), has not filed as an exhibit to its Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, any instrument with respect to long-termdebt not being registered where the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does notexceed ten percent of the total assets of the Partnership and its subsidiaries on a consolidatedbasis. Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, the Partnership hereby agrees tofurnish a copy of any such agreement to the Securities Exchange Commission upon request.         AIMCO Properties, L.P.           By: AIMCO-GP, Inc., its general partner           By: /s/ Thomas M. Herzog Thomas M. Herzog      Executive Vice President andChief FinancialOfficer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2361]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      TRIBUTE TO MARTHA L. FRANCO

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. JOHN T. DOOLITTLE

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. DOOLITTLE. Madam Speaker, in my years of public service, I have 
benefitted from the efforts of many capable employees on my staff who 
have come and gone. Yet there has always remained one constant in my 
office, Martha Franco, and for that I am truly grateful.
  Martha was born in Guadalajara, Mexico. Her parents, Maria and 
Doroteo Franco and her siblings, Jeronimo, Humberto, Benilde, Bertha, 
Oscar, Abel, Hector, Dinora and Gloria all emigrated to the United 
States where they settled in the small town of Colusa, California. As a 
naturalized citizen, she is a model example of someone who made the 
efforts required to become a U.S. citizen and has gone on to contribute 
to our country through public service. She is also active in helping 
needy families in the Sacramento area and from the small village in 
Mexico where her family is from. Martha first came to work for me in 
1984 when I served in the California State Senate.
  When I was elected to Congress in 1990, Martha became my Executive 
Assistant and Office Manager. She has worked for me in Washington and 
in California, and this year I named her as my Deputy Chief of Staff. 
Martha's loyal presence has meant so much to my wife, Julie, to me, and 
to our entire organization. The people who call upon our office have 
appreciated seeing a familiar face through the years, and I have 
appreciated having someone who knows the many people who have been 
important to us throughout my career. Martha's unsurpassed character 
and dedication have allowed me to trust her with confidential and 
sensitive materials and to do so with great confidence.
  Martha's spirit is demonstrated by her commitment to family and 
heritage as well. She cares for her father at home and is a wonderful 
aunt to her many nieces and nephews, their beloved ``Tia Mart''. I know 
she is looking forward to spending even more time with her large family 
as she begins a new chapter in her life.
  While our work together will soon end, Martha will always remain an 
important person in our lives. As she looks to new opportunities, I 
wish Martha all the best, and look forward to her continued friendship 
in the years to come.

                          ____________________
```
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for January 2013

1.Cases Pending Beginning of Month 302.Cases Added to Docket 

Neupauer Masonry, Inc.
No. 12-1336
Direction for Review on 1/14/13

Permabond Construction, Inc.
No. 12-0993
Direction for Review on 1/16/13

Kiewit Power Constructors Co.
No. 11-2395
Direction for Review on 1/24/13

K.M. Davis Contracting, Inc.
No. 12-0643
Direction for Review on 1/25/13

4
3.Cases Subtracted From Docket

K.E.R. Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Armadillo Underground
No. 08-1225
Decision on 1/9/13

Neupauer Masonry, Inc.
No. 12-1336
Remand Order on 1/24/13

-24.Total Cases Pending End of Month32
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MARGARET DORMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1710 ) MID-STATE PLUMBING, INC., a ) Florida profit corporation, and ) GREGORY TAYLOR, an individual, ) ) Appellees. ) ________________________________ )
Opinion filed September 21, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; John Radabaugh, Judge. David I. Shiner, Lara S. Shiner, and Ronnie M. Gotti II of Shiner Law Group, Boca Raton, for Appellant. Michael L. Forte and Robert L. Blank, B.C.S., of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 13, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 13, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0172. JOEY SAMPSON v. JAMES CURETON et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SU10DM3887
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 475 

Recognizing the 100th running of the Indianapolis 500 Mile Race. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2016 

Mr. COATS (for himself and Mr. DONNELLY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th running of the Indianapolis 500 Mile 

Race. 

Whereas founders of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Carl 

G. Fisher, Arthur C. Newby, Frank H. Wheeler, and 

James A. Allison pooled their resources in 1909 to build 

the Indianapolis Motor Speedway 6 miles from downtown 

Indianapolis as a testing ground to support the growing 

automotive industry of Indiana, paving the way for 

motorsport innovation; 

Whereas, in 1909, the track of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway was surfaced with 3,200,000 paving bricks at a cost 

of $400,000; 

Whereas, on May 30, 1911, the first Indianapolis 500 Mile 

Race took place and was won by Ray Harroun in 6 hours 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 475 ATS 

and 42 minutes at an average speed of 74.6 miles per 

hour; 

Whereas, as of 2016, the Indianapolis 500 Mile Race has occurred on every Memorial Day weekend since 1911, except during the involvement of the United States in 

World Wars I and II from 1917 through 1918 and 1942 

through 1945, respectively; 

Whereas, in 1936, Louis Meyer, after his third win of the Indianapolis 500 Mile Race, established the iconic tradition 

of drinking milk in the winner’s circle; 

Whereas Tony Hulman purchased the Indianapolis Motor 

Speedway in 1945, restoring the track and restarting the 

Indianapolis 500 Mile Race after its cancellation during 

World War II; 

Whereas the Indianapolis 500 Mile Race is the largest single 

day sporting event in the world, with more than 300,000 

fans packing the grandstands and the expansive infield of 

the Indianapolis Motor Speedway on race day; 

Whereas the Indianapolis 500 Mile Race has played an integral part in the culture and heritage of the City of Indianapolis, the State of Indiana, and motorsports and the 

automotive industry in the United States; 

Whereas the Indianapolis Motor Speedway has been a showcase of speed, human achievement, and the continuous 

pursuit of glory, and is a source of great pride for all citizens of Indiana; 

Whereas Tony Kanaan set the record for the fastest Indianapolis 500 Mile Race, finishing it in slightly longer than 

2 hours and 40 minutes at an average speed of 187.4 

miles per hour; 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 475 ATS 

Whereas, in 2016, the Indianapolis Motor Speedway and racing fans around the world prepare to celebrate the greatest spectacle in racing for the 100th time: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the 100th run2 ning of the Indianapolis 500 Mile Race. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         744,396
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,951,366
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               270,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,064,173
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,188,699
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         6,890,728
<LOANS>                                     99,856,920
<ALLOWANCE>                                    431,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,125,547
<DEPOSITS>                                 100,409,711
<SHORT-TERM>                                 7,100,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,776,427
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,833,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             120,125,547
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,970,248
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              140,232
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                61,631
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,172,111
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,024,947
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,073,254
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,098,857
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   55,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             133,716
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                854,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                322,249
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     198,615
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   198,615
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.96
<LOANS-NON>                                    814,021
<LOANS-PAST>                                   303,787
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               434,515
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   59,506
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,420
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              434,929
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           431,929
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





AMERCO
 Reno, Nevada
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No 33-56571) of AMERCO and consolidating entities (“Company”) of our report dated May 29, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of SAC Holding II Corporation (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Blackwater Investments, Inc.) and its subsidiaries consolidated in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010.
 /s/ Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP
 
 Phoenix, Arizona
 June 9, 2010