,**~.** .. -



# REQUEST FOR REDESIGNATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR OZONE ATTAINMENT IN THE INDIANA PORTION OF THE LOUISVILLE BASIC OZONE NONATTAINMENTAREA
Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana Developed By: The Indiana Department ofEnvironmental 'Management July 2006 (Revised,September 2006)r------------------------------ --.



### This page left intentionally blank

### TABLE OF CONTENTS 

### 1.0 INTRODUCTION : 1 

### 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Geographical Description 2 1.3 Status ofAir Quality ; 

### 2 

### 2.0 REQUIREMENTS FORREDESIGNATION .3 2.1 General ; ; 3 2.2 Ozone Monitoring · 3 2.3 Emission Inventory 3 2.4 Modeling Demonstration 4 2.5 Controls and Regulations : 4 2.6 Corrective Actions for Potential Future Violations ofthe Standard. .4· 

### 3.0 OZONE MONITORING · 5 3.1 Ozone Monitoring Network : ; 5 

### 3.2Ambient Ozone**Monitori~g D~ta**  : ;..**L:~~~.: ;.;:~~**  

## ..; ..6: ". 3.3 Quality Assurance : : , : ;;;:.:;·:

### ~·.; L8 

### :3.4 Continued Monitoring ; , ;:;;:•.; : ;.9 

### 4.0 EMISSION INVENTORY :

### ::~ ..

### L~ 

## : ..; 9 

### 4.1 Emission Trends : : 9 4.2 Base Year Inventory J4 4.3 Emission Inventories 14 4.4 Demonstration ofMaintenance 18 4.5 Permanent and Enforceable Emission**Reduc~ions** 

### 19 4.6 Provisions for Future Updates : 19 

### 5.0 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY BUDGETS 19 5.1 Overview 19 5.2 Emission Estimations : 20



### ii6.0 

### CONTROL MEASURES AND REGULATIONS 21 6.1 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) 21 6.2 Implementation ofpast SIP revisions 21 6.3 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Rule 23
. 6.4 Measures Beyond Clean AirAct**Requirement~** 24 6.5 Controls to Remain in Effect 25 6.6 New Source Review (NSR) Provisions 25 

### 7.0 MODELING 25 7.1 Summary ofModeling Results for National Emission Control Strategies in Final RUlemakings 26 7.2 Summary ofModeling Results to SupportRulemakings 27 7.3 Summary ofExisting Modeling Results 28 7.4 Temperature Analysis for Clark and Floyd Counties 29 7.5 Summary ofMeteorological Conditions : 31 

### 8.0 CORRECTIVE' ACTIONS : 32
.

. ••8.1C<>mmitmentto Revise 'P1an

### ~"i**+.~ ~34** 

..8.2 CommitmentforContingtmcYMeasures L 

# L : : :: ;;: 3,2 ) r 

### 8.3 Contingency

### Measure~ :;.•; 

### ,.+: ;.; ;-+33 ..•....... 9.0 

### PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ; ;..; 34 10.0 CONCLUSIONS ; 34



### iii

### FIGURES Figure 3.1 Louisville Basic Nonattainment Area 5 

### TABLES Table 3.1 Monitoring Data for Clark and Floyd Counties 2003

- 2005 6 Table 4.1 Comparison of2003 and 2020 Projected Emission Estimates in Tons Per Summer Day, Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana : 17 Table 4.2 Comparison of2003 and 2020 Projected Emission Estimates in Tons Per Summer Day for Entire Nonattainment Area :**~.17** 

### Table 5.1 Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources 20 Table 5.2 Mobile Vehicle Emission Budgets 20 Table 6.1**Tr~nds** 

### in EGU Ozone Season NOx Emissions Statewide in Indiana 23 Table 7.1 Modeling Results from U.S. EPA HDE Rulemaking for Clark and Floyd Counties
...26 Table 7.2 LADCO Modeling Results for 8-Hour Ozone Assessment. : 27 Table 7.3 Modeling Results from U.S. EPA for the Clean Air Interstate Rule 28 Table 7.4 LADCO's Round 3 Modeling Results for the Clean Air InterstateRule 28

.Table 7.5 Analysis ofMaximum Temperatures for Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana{Percent •... .. . Change frpm MaxiInum. Temperature e'F) Normals (l971-4000»**:;~** 

### .•...29
•Table '7.6. ComparisOI,l

### ()fDays~th90o F and

### 8~hour**Ozon~** Exceedance

### D~y.s:, ..

### L.L

..;;..'.:

.....:.30. GRAPHS Graph 3.1 2003-2005 Design Values for Clark and Floyd Counties (Indiana's Portion of NonattainmentArea) : 7 Graph 3.2 2003-2005 Design 

### Values for**Kentucky'~** 

### Portion ofNonattainment Area 7 Graph 3.3 Trends in 

### Clark and Floyd**Counties~** 

### Indiana 8-HourDesign Values '1997 through 2005 8 Graph 4.1 Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana VOC Point Source Emissions 1996

- 2003 10 Graph 4.2 Clark and Floyd Counti,es, IndianaNOx Point Source Emissions 1996

- 2003 .10 Graph 4.3 Statewide NO" Emissions from Electric Generating Units 1999

- 2005 ........•............ 11 Graph 4.4 VOC Emissions Trends, 1996

- '2003, All Sources in Clark and Floyd Counties 12 Graph 4.5 Total VOC Emissions Trends, 1996

- 2003, Entire NonattairimentArea 12 Graph4.6 NOx 

### Emissions Trends, 1996:' 2003, All Sources in Clark and Floyd Counties 13 Graph4.7 Total NO" Emissions Trends, 1996

- 2003, Entire NonattainmentArea 13 Graph 4.8 Comparison of2003, 2011 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for Clark and Floyd Counties ..........................................................................................•......... 15 ' t
. 

### Graph 4.9 Comparisqn of2003, 2011 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for Entire Nonattainrnent Area ; : 16 Graph 4.10 Comparison of2003,2011 and'2020 Projected NOx 

### EmissionS from Clark and Floyd Counties' : : : 16

iv

### Graph 4.11 Comparison of2003, 2011 and 2020 Projected NOx 

### Emissions for Entire Nonattainment Area : 17 

### Graph 7.1 

### Comparison ofDays with 90° F 

### and 8-Hour Ozone Exceedance Days .......•...............31 

### APPENDICES A Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Data B Emissions Inventories C 2011 and 2020 Projected Emissions Inventory Clark and Floyd Counties D Public Participation Documentation E. Mobile Input/Output Calculation Files Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana 

# ·

.



### v

### REQUEST FOR REDESIGNATIONAND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR OZONE ATTAINMENT IN THE 8-HOUR OZONE BASIC NONATTAINMENT AREA CLARKAND FLOYD COUNTIES, INDIANA
1.0 INTRODUCTION This document supports Indiana's request that Clark and Floyd Counties, which are part ofthe Louisville basic ozone nonattainment area, be redesignated from nonattainment to attainment of the 8-hourozone standard. In addition, the State ofKentucky also intends to submit a request for the Kentucky portion Qfthe Louisville basic**ozo~e** 

### nonattainrnent area to be 

### redesignated from nonattainment to attainment ofthe 8-hour ozone" standard. The Louisville area has recorded three years of**co~plete,** 

### quality assured ambient air quality monitoringdata for 2003

- 2005 demonstrating attainment with the 8-"hour standard. Section 1"07 ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA) establishes specific requirementsl<> beme.t'inorderfor ' Can. 

### areat<,>be considered for redesigriation including: fa) •A detennination thatthe area has**attain~d** 

### thei8-hour ozone**standard~** 

### " (b) Anapproved State ImplementatiollPlail(SIP) for the area wider Seqtlon lrO(k). (c) A determination that the improvement in air quality is due to permarient and enforceable reductions in emissions resulting from implementation ofthe SIP and other federal requirements. (d)" A fully approved maintenance plan under Section 175{A). (e) A determination that all Section 110 and Part D requirements have beenmet. 

## This document addresses each ofthose requirements. It 

### also provides additional information to support continued compliance with the 8-hour ozone standard. 1.1 Background The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) required areas failing to meetthe National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone to develop SIPs to expeditiously attain and maintain the standard. 

### In 1997 the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) revised the airquality standards for ozone replacing the"1979 I-hour standard with an 8-hour ozone standard set at 

### 0.08 parts permillion (ppm). The standard was challenged legally and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court 

### in February of2001. The U.S. EPA designated areas under the 8-hourozone standard on April 15, 2004 as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable.



### IHistorically two (2) monitors have been operated by the IDEM's Office ofAir Quality in Clark and Floyd Counties. In Clark County, the Charlestown monitor (Airs ID 18-019-0003) has operated continuously since prior to 1980. In Floyd County, theNew Albany monitor (Airs ID 18-043-1004) has been operated continuously since 1995. On April 15, 2004, U.S. EPA designated Clark and Floyd Counties Basic nonattainment and subject to the new 8-hour ozone . requirements, including development ofa plan to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) and oxides ofnitrogen (NOl{) emissions and a demonstration that the area will meet the 8-hour ozone standard for ozone by June 15,2009. 1.2 Geographical Description FolloWing is a briefdescription ofthe Louisvillebasic nonattainment area. Jefferson, Bullitt and Oldham Counties located in north central Kentucky and Clark and Floyd Counties located in southeastern Indiana are 

### part ofthe Louisville metropolitan statistical area. This area is surrounded by the Kentucky counties ofHardin, Henry, Nelson, Shelby, Spencer, and Trimble and the Indiana counties ofHarrison, Jefferson, Scott, and Washington. The Ohio River

·flows along the border between Kentucky and Indiana and the area lies within the Ohio River Valley. The Louisville Basic Nonattainment Area is shown in Figure 3.1
. .•lhe Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management (IDEM), on behalfofthe Stateof Indiana, isrequesting redesignation forClark and FloydCoiintiesin Indiana. TheAirPQllution· Control District ofJefferson County (APCD) is rel)ponsibleforJeffersonCounty.(Lpwsville) in north central I<.entucky. The Kentucky Department ofEnvironmental ProtectiQIl(KDEP}is responsible for Bullitt and Oldham Counties in Kentucky. the KentuckyDepartment of Environmental Protection is reque$ting redesignation ofKentucky's portion ofthe nonattainment area, including Bullitt, Oldham and Jefferson Counties, from U.S. EPA Region IV, concurrently. 1.3 Status ofAir Quality Ozone monitoring data for the most recent three (3) years, 2003 through 2005, demonstrates that air quality has met the NAAQS for ozone inthis Basic nonattainment area. This fact, accompanied by the permanent and**enforcea~le** reductions in emission levels discussed 

### in Section 4.0,justifies a redesignation to· attainment for the subject area based on Section 107(d)



### . (3) (E) ofthe CAAA.

2 

# ..

### 2.0 REQUIREMENTS FOR REDESIGNATION 2.1 General Section 110 and Part. D ofthe CAAA lists the requirements that must be metby nonattainment areas priorto consideration for redesignation to attainment. In addition, U.S. EPA has published detailed guidance in a document entitled ··Procedures for ProcessingRequests to Redesignate Areas toAttainment", 

### issued September 4. 1992. to Regional Air Directors. This document is hereafter referred to as "Redesignation Guidance". This Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Plan is based on the Redesignation Guidance, supplemented with additional guidance received from staffofthe Regulatory Development Section ofU.S: EPA Region V. 2.2 

### Ozone Monitoring

. 107(d)(3)(E)(i)

1) A demonstration that the NAAQS for ozone, as published in 40 CFR 50:4, have been attained. Ozone monitoring data muSt show that violations ofthe ambient

.standard are no longer occurring.

, 2) 

### Atnbie.nt monitoringdataquality assured in accordance with40 

### CFR SKI0, 

### recorded in the U.S. EPA Air Quality System(AQS) database,and is availablefor '**publicview~** 

### 3) A showing that the three'"yearaverageofthe fourth.highestvalues, based on data .:; from all monitoring sites in the area or its affected downwind environs. is below 85 parts per billion (Ppb). This showing must rely on three (3) complete, consecutive calendaryears ofquality assured data. 4) .A commitment that, once redesignated, the State will continue to operate an appropriate**mo~toring** 

### networkto verify the maintenanc.e ofthe attainment status. 2.3.Emission Inventory 107(d)(3)(E)(iii) 

### 1) 2) 3) A comprehensive einission inventory ofthe precursors ofozone completed for· the

. base year. . A projection ofthe emission inventory for a yearat least 10 years following redesignation.
. A dem.onstration that theprojected level ofemissions is sufficientto maintain the ozone standard.4) A demonstration that improvement in air quality between the year violations occurred and attainment was achieved is based on permanent and enforceable emission reductions and not on temporary adverse economic conditions or unusually favorable meteorology. 5) Provisions for future annual updates ofthe inventory to enabletracking ofthe emission levels including an annual emission statementfrom**~ajor** sources. 2.4 Modeling Demonstration While no modeling

## IS re<iuired for redesignating ozone nonattainment areaS, IDEM has incorporated photochemical modeling information as part ofthis document to further support its request for Clark and Floyd Counties to be redesignated to attainment 2.5 Controls and Regulations

. 107(d)(3)(E)(ii) & 107(d)(3)(E)(v) 1) A U.S. EPA-approved SIP control strategy that includes ReasonablyAvailable Control Technology (RACT) requirements for existing stationary sources covered by ControlTeehnolow Guidelines (CTG) and non-CTGRACTforaUmajor sources. i >> ',; Evidel1cethat**control~easUtes** required in past ()zone SIP revisionshave bee!),: fully implemented. ' , " 3) Acceptable provisions to provide for new source review. 4) Assurances that existing controls will remain in effect afterredesignation, unless the State demonstrates through photochemical modeling that the standard can be maintained without one (1) orm<?re controls.· 5) Ifappropriate, a commitmentto adopt a requirement that all transportationplans conform to, and are consistent with, the SIP. ' 2.6 Corrective Actions for Potential Future Violations ofthe Standard 

# ..

1) 2)

3) 

### 4) A commitmentto submit a revised plan eight (8) years afterredesignation. A commitmentto expeditiously enact and implement additional contingency control measures inresponse to exceeding specifiedpredetermined levels (triggers) or inthe eventthat future violations ofthe ambient standard occurs. A list.ofpotential' contingency measures that would be implemented 

### in such an event. A list ofVOC and NOx sources potentially subjectto future controls. 

### 4

### 3.0 OZONE MONITORING 3.1 Ozone Monitoring Network There are two (2) monitors measuring ozone concentrations in Clark and Floyd·Counties. These monitors are currently operated by IDEM's Office ofAir Quality (OAQ). A listing ofthe existing monitors' four (4) highest readings from 2003 through 2005 is shown in Table 3.1 and was retrieved from the

### U~S. EPA's Air Quality System (AQS). The locations ofthe monitoring sites for Clark and Floyd Counties.are shown on Figure 3.1. 

### Figure 3.1 Louisville Basic Nonattainment Area ,ingtQo

i'fison**~:** .': : 

### \(.:

"

o 2 4 8 MUes I .. , t I I I I I



### 5 Legend .to**2G05~Moo"",** -In_""",,","**-us~** -Mojor

....... STATES DIncIIIIII CJKoNJcItr She'**.~**3.2 Ambient Ozone Monitoring Data The following infonnation is taken from U.S. EPA's "Guideline on Data Handling Conventions for the 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS),"U.S. EPA-454/R-98- 017, December 1998. Three (3) complete years ofozone monitoring data are required to demonstrate attainment at a monitoring site. The 8-hour primary and secondary ozone ambient air quality standards are met at an ambient air quality monitoring site when the three (3) year average ofthe annual fourthhighest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration is less than or equal to 0.08 ppm. When this occurs, the site is said to be in attainment. Three (3) significant digits must be earned in the computations. Because the third decimal digit, in ppm, is rounded, 0.084 ppm is the largest concentration that is less than, orequal to 0.08 ppm. Therefore, for the purposes ofthis request, the 8-hour.standard is considered to be 0.085 ppm. Values below 0.085 ppm meet the**s~dard,** values equal to or greaterthan 0.085 ppm exceed the standard. These data handling procedures are applied on an individual basis at each monitor in the area. An area is in compliance with the 8-hour ozone NAAQS if, and only if, every monitoring site inthe area meets the NAAQS. An· individual site's three (3) year average ofthe annual fourth· highest daily maximum.8-hour average.ozone concentration is also called: thesite's design value
.. The air quality design valuefodheareais the highestdesign.valueamong aU monitoringcsites in the**ar~fi:** 

## . . '.. Table.

### 3.lshowsth6'annharfourth highest values 

### bysite andthe 2003-2005

### d~signvalues for 

### both·oftheozone monitoring sites in

### Indiana'8 portion ofth¢ nonattainment area,.:' D CI k d Fl d C t' 2003-2005 T bl 31 M .



### a e • omtormg ata or ar an OYl 

### oun les 1ST 2ND**~RD** 4TH 2003-02005 SITE 10 COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR %OB5 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR AVERAGE (oom) (porn) (oom) (porn) (oom) 18-019-

0003 CLARK CHARLESTOWN 2003
. 99 0.096 0.092 0.092 0.090 18-019-

0003 CLARK CHARLESTOWN 2004 99 0.08 0.078 0.076 0.074 18-019-

0003 CLARK CHARLESTOWN 2005 95 0.098' 0.092 0.086 0.080 0.081 18-043-

1004 FLOYD NEWALBANY 2003 100 0.097 0.097 0.092 0.086 18-043- :

1004 FLOYD NEWALBANY 2004 96 0.079 0.078 0.077 0.071· 18-043-,

1004 FLOYD NEWALBANY 2005 94 0.092 0.086 0.081 0.080 0.079 Graph 

### 3.1 visually**de~onstrates** the design values forIndiana's portion ofthe nonattainment area.



### 6

L.......,-

-- ----- ------------------ .. --- .. _

### , Graph 3.1

- 2003-2005 Design Values for Clark and Floyd Counties (Indiana's Portion ofNonattainment Area) 0.100 ...-----------------------------, 0.095 

### +------------------,------------l 0.090 

### +----------------------------l

Charlestow n 18-019-0003 New Albany 18-043-1004

. ·11.::
....: ..'%14th High .....8 Hour Standard 

# I
Graph 3.2 illustrates the design values for the Kentucky**port~on** ofthenonattainment

# area. Graph 3.2-2003-20()5DesignValtiesfor

### K~ntllcky's Portion ofNonattainment

### Are~

0.085**+-----.~--..:..--~** 

### ......----,--......-----....-......:..---....--_I

0.080**+----~---------------------**
0.075 

## +.......-------------

. 0.070

0.065 SHEPHERDSVILLE (NOT IN A CITY) 21·029·0006 21·111·0027 lOUISVII.LE 21·111·0051 LOUISV ILlE 21·111·1021 BUCKNER 21·185·0004 1?20l11a2003·2005 Design Value -.-8·hour Standard 

### The design values for Clark and Floyd counties, along withthe nonattainment area 

### in its entirety, demonstrate that the NMQS for ozone have been attained. 

### 7

._. -' --." -_ ......

### _---- ._-----------------"Graph 3.3 1997 through 2005 8-hourDesign Values for Clark and Floyd Counties 

### 0.100 ..,..--------"-------------------, 0.095**+-~~-------------------1**

o 

### =0 085 

# +-------......**&-..--------~--__i** E'**~O,080** 

### +----------------:..----------1
CI) 

# - :;0.075 +---..----r------,,.------.----.----,-----,-----; 

### 97-99 98-00 99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 

### 03-05 !-+-oesignvalue-8 

### Hour NAAQS 

# I
.GraphJ.3 shgws the trend in deslgI)values forClaikand FloydCounties

# overtheiP~tseyeI1 years. TheShariestoWlliIl10mtqr, inClark. County,Jndiana,pas traditional!yseIYe?

### asth~< ••.

..

### co~trolli~g ozonelIlonitotfortile

### L01~isvilIe basic ozone.

### no~attaimnent**area~:t.\comprehensive** ···lislot'the sites' desIgn

## va11:les

## itin Appendix

### A. The area's design value hastiended dowpward·

as emissions have declined·due to such programs as the Acid Rain program and cleaner automobiles and fuels both regionally and locally. U.S. EPA's rule to control nitrogen oxides from specific source categories (40 CFR Parts 51, 72, 75 and 96, published on October 17, 1998 and referred to as the "NOxSIP Call") has significantly reduced emissions from large electric generating units (EGUs),industrial boilers, and cement lOIns. Indiana's NOxRule was adopted on June 6, 2001 (326 lAC 10-3 and 10-4). An analysis ofmeteorological conditions and monitoring values is in Section 7.0 and supports the conclusion that attainment ofthe standard as of2005 is not the result ofunusually favorable**meteorologi~al** conditions. It is expected that this downwardtrend will continue as the above·programs continue and the U.S"EPA Clean Air Interstate Rule is implemented. 3.3' Quality Assurance IDEM has quality assured all data shown 

### in Appendix

## A. in accordance with40 CFR 58.10 and the Indiana Quality Assurance Manual. IDEM has recorded the data in theAQS database and, thus, they are available to the public.



### 83.4 Continued Monitoring Indiana commits to continue monitoring ozone levels at or nearthe sites indicated in Table 3.1 and Appendix A. IDEM will consult with U.S. EPA Region V staffprior to making changes to the existing monitoring network, ·should changes be necessary in the future. IDEM will continue to quality assure the monitoring data to meet the requirements of

## 40 CFR 58. Connection to a central station and updates to the IDEM websiteI will provide real time availability ofthe data and knowledge ofany exceedances. IDEM will enter all data into AQS on a timely basis in accordance with federal guidelines.
4.0 EMISSION INVENTORY Clark and Floyd Counties are part ofthe Louisville metropolitan area but account for a relatively small portion ofthe overall emissions inventory. The impact ofthe NOx SIP call on monitor values in Clark and Floyd Counties demonstrate the area is affected by transport. Thert?fore, regional emission reductions affect ozone levels in Clark and Floyd**Countie~** far more so than emission reductions within the counties themselves. Graphs 4.2 and 4.7 demonstrate .the most relevant regional reduction in NOxthat is attributable to the lowered ozone cqncentrations in (Jll:lrkand FloydC<;>unties.**B~causeof** the significance ofregional**emissionsr~duetions,.** Section 4:0 0summarizes both regional and local emissions information.
. 0 • U.S.EPA's

### Rede~ignation Gllldance requires the submittal ofa

### comprehensiv~inventory of ozone prt?cursoremissions (VOC andNOx ) representative oftheyear when the ·area·achieves"O
. attainment ofthe ozone airquality standard;.Indiarla must also demonstrate 

## tHatthe

oimprovement in air quality between the year that vio.lations occurred and the year that attainment was achieved is based on permanent and enforceable emtssion reductions. Other emissions inventory related requirements include a pI:ojection ofthe emission inventory to a year at leastten (l0) years following redesignation, a demonstration that the projected level ofemissions is sufficient to maintain the ozone standard, and a commitmentt.o provide future updates ofthe inventory to enable tracking ofemission levels during the ten (lO) year maintenance.period. The following subsections address each ofthese requirements. 4.1 Emission Trends· Graphs 4.1 and 4.2 show the trend in point source emissions ofVOC and NOx respectively that generally correspond to the years ofmonitored values referenced in this petition. The point source data are taken from Indiana's**~ual** emissions reporting program.

1 www.in.gov/idem/ 

### 9

### Graph 4.1 Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana VOC Point Source Emissions 1996

- 2003 

# vae Point Source Em issions Clark and Floyd Counties

(T 0 

### ns per Sum mer 0 ay) 

### 10

8 

## 6 4 2 

# o 1996 1999 2002 2003 I{2JVOC 

# I

NOx 

## Pen·n

# t.f's 0 

## urc,e 

# Em issio os 

## ". ,:

## :Clark~ndFI'o yd 

## Counties" (T 0 

## ns per Sum III 

## e r Day) Graph 4.2 Clark and Floyd Counties, IndianaN-ox PointSource EmissioDs1996-2003 ;

,',.

. " .',":. ,',



### 40.0.0 30.00 20.00 10.00

0
..00 

## 1996 1999

. 2002 2003 

# jmNox 

# I

10

### EGUSources Graph 4.3 depicts the trends in statewide NOxemissions from EGUs. While ozone and its precursors are transported into this region from outside the area, this information does provide some indication ofthe' impact that Indiana sources may have on the nonattainment area. The emissions are decreasing substantially in response to national programs affecting all EGUs such as the Acid Rain program and the NOxSIP Call. Other**se~tors** 

### ofthe inventory also impact ozone formation, but large regional sources such as EGUs have a substantial**impac~** 

### on the formation ofozone. . These data were taken from U.S. EPA's Clean AirMarkets database2• 

### Data are available sooner for these units than other point sources in the inventory because ofthe NOxSIP Call budget and trading**requiremen~s.** 

### Information from 2003 

### is significant because some EGUs started operation oftheir NOxSIP Call controls in order to generate Early Reduction Credits ror their future year NOx'budgets. The first season ofthe SIP CaU budgetperiod began May 31, 2004. As part of the NOxSIP Call, the states were required to adopt into theirrules a budget for all large EGUs. Indiana's budget is referenced in**~26** 

### lAC 10-4. The budgetrepresents a statewide cap on NOx**emission~.** 

### Although each unit is allocated emissions based uponhistoric**heatiinput~** i 

### utilities can meet thispudget by,()ver.;con1:I:olling certain units orpurchasingdreditsfrom the
.

. market to account**fo.~.overages** 

# atotherunits: To summarize,NOxemissionsbavediamaiically '. decreased overthe

### ye~representedon these graphs. These emissions, capped birthestateiule"i**:~houletremainat** 

### leastthislowthrough the**m~ntenance** 

### period covered by

### tllls request;· ", ., 

### ·:rL 

### Graph 4.3 Statewide NOx

### Emissions from Electric Generating Units 1999

- 2005 

### 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000

80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000. 

# o 1999 . 2000 2001 

### 2002 2003 2004 2005 

### ImiNOXTOns perOzone Seasonl

http://www.epa.gov/ainnarkets 

### 11

.- .-.-- ..... ----"AllAnthropogenic Sources Periodic inventories, which include emissions from all sectors
- mobile, area, non-road, and point sources - were prepared for 1.996, 1999,2002 and 2003. Graphs 4.4 and 4.6 show the trend for the total emissions for all anthropogenic source categories in these years. Graphs 4.5 and 4.7 below show the trend in VOC and NOx emissions, respectively, for the entire nonattainment area, which also roughly follow the years ofmonitored trends discussed in Section 3.0. Graphs and data tables for emissions for each source category are available in Appendix B.

. 

### Graph 4.4 VOC Emissions Trends, 1996

- 2003, All Sources in Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana
VOC Em issions· All Sources Clark and Floyd Counties

(T 0 n s per Sum mer 0 

# ay) 40 "A Ot> 

# .. 

# . n**"L.O~** 29.26

d •.: .. 

### , .,. ;" . } a.;· ,

.**I'~** :

..... : . , ... : 

### ,. . 2002 

# Imvoc I Graph 4.5 Total VOC Emissions Trends, 1996

- 2003, Entire Nonattainment Area VOC Em isslon·s· All Sources

Entire Nonattainm ent Area

. (10 n s per Sum mer 0 a

### y) 

### 260 240 220 200· 1)1:
...**4~** 

# .



# -

# ---- .r..r. " •.r. v 

### 223.25 217.59

1996 1999 

### 2002 2003

## I~voc 

# I
Note: Kentucky emissions data is preliminary and subject to possible change.

12

L--**~_** ... _

### Graph 4.6 

### NOx 

### Emissions Trends, 1996

- 

### 2003, All 

### Sources in Clark and ,Floyd. Counties, Indiana NOx Em issions ··AII Sources Clark and Floyd Counties

(T 0 

### n s per Sum mer Day) 70 60 50 40 30 20 1 0



## o 1996 1999 57.59

2002 2003



### Graph 4.7 

### TotalNOx

### Emissions 'Trends, .1996
.. 

### 20Q3, Entire Nonattainment,Area'



## .N Ox Emlssio ItS •

# Arts ou rc e. s 

# En tireN 0 n

## alta in 

## 111 en fAre a'

(Tons 

### 'p**~r** 

# s u' m

### m~e r 0 a y) 400 

### 350 

### 300 250 

### 200 150 

### 100

50



# o

. 1996 1999 

## ImNOx 

# I 2003

Note: Kentucky emissions data is preliminary and subject to possible change

.. Graph 4.4 shows a consistent decrease in VOC emissions for Clark and Floyd**Counti~s.** Although graph 4.6 shows a slight increase 

### in NOx emissions for Clark and Floyd Counties from 1999 to 2002, the overall reduction ofVOC and NOxemissions for the entire nonattainment area clearly demonstrate the downward emissions trend for the area. . 

### .13

### 4.2 Base Year Inventory IDEM prepared a comprehensive inventory for Clark and Floyd Counties, including Area, Mobile, and Point sources for precursors ofozone (volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides) for base year2003.
• Area source emissions for the 1996 and 1999 inventories were generated by 

### U.S. EPA and are part ofthe National Emissions Inventory (NEI). The2003 area sources were projected from the Indiana 2002 periodic inventory submitted to U.S. EPA. These projections were derived by applying growth factors developed under contract for LADCO modeling.

• .Mobile source emissions for 1996 and 1999 were generated by 

### U.S. EPA and are part ofthe National Emissions Inventory (NEI). The 2003 mobile source emissions were calculated from MOBILE6produced emission factors.
• Point source infonnation for 1996 and 1999 was compiled from IDEM's 1996 and 1999 annual emissions statement database. Point source information for the 2003 analysis was compiled from IDEM's 2003 annual emissions statement database and the 2Q03 U.S. EPA Air Markets acid rain database3

. • I;3iogenic emissions are not included in these summaries.
• !'fon-road emissionsfor 1996 and 1999 were generated by U.S. EPA and are part of the· ,

### NationfllEmission~ Inventory (NEI). The 2Q03emissions weregeneRtedbyIDEM;{ming

### n~w J;lon-road

### estiIJ1~tion model provided

### byU~S. SPA. to

### ad4[~ss**,c()n?ernS~pout** 

### lb.e'· ?ccuracyofsome

### Q(th~cflteg{)riesin

### U.S. EPA'sNon-rgad

### erili~sions**T-0del~;the)J~e:** ..'
.

### ~ichig~ AirpireGtors' C<)llS9rtiuin(LAJ)CO)(MidwestRegi?nal'

### Plarwing'9rg(ffii~tion),

### contraet~d with two:(2) companiesto review tliebase

### &iaandh1ak~ fe.commendaiions." ;.'

### i EmissioQ.s.were estimatedfor commercial marine

### vesselsand~i1roads, .Recreational ."
. ..,' motorboat population and spatial surrogates (used to assign emissions to each county) were significantly updated. The populations for the construction equipment category were reviewed and updated based upon surveys completed in the Midwest and the temporal allocation for agricultural sources was also updated. One ofthe contractors also estimated emissions for two (2) non-road categories notincluded in U.S. EPA's Non-road model. Appendix B contains datatables and graphs ofall these emissions. 

### 4.3 Emission Projections In consultation with the U.S. EPA and other stakeholders, IDEM selected the year2020 as the maintenance yearfor this redesignation request. This document contains projected emission inventories for 2011 and 2020.
. .

3 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/acidrain 14IDEM performed emission projections 'for Clark and Floyd Counties using the following' approaches:

• Mobile source emission projections are based on the U.S. EPA MOBILE6 model. The 'analysis is described in more detail in Section 5.0. All projections were made in accordance with "Procedures for Preparing Emissions Projections"; U.S. EPA-45/4-91-019.
• Mobile source emission projections for 2011 and 2020 exclude reductions associated with the State ofIndiana's vehicle inspection and maintenance program currently in place in Clark and Floyd Counties, indiana.
• Emission inventories are required to be projected to future dates to assess the influence growth and future controls will have. The Midwest Regional Planning Organization (Midwest RPO) has developed growth and control files for Point, Area, and Non-road categories. These files were used to develop the future year emissions estimates used inthis document. 

### This was done so that the inventories used for redesignation are consistent with modeling performed in the future. The detailed inventory information for Clark and Floyd Counties for 2011 and 2020 is in Appendix B. Emission trends are an important gauge for continued compliance ofthe ozone stapdard. Therefore, IDEMperformed an initialcomparison ofthe inventoriesfor the base year (2003), interimyear (2011), and maintenance year (2020) for Clark and FloydCounties, 9S.well as ille entire.nonattainment area. Graphs 4.8 and 4.10 visually compare the 2003 (base**y~ar)** ,

.**e,slima~e4** emissiQns withthefOJ 1**~d** 2020 projected emissions for CJlifk.ap9,FloydCounties.

Graphs 4.9 and4.1J visually compaJ;e the2003 (baseyear) estimate,d emissions \Viththe201 1'··.

### a:n~~020projeCted.e11:lissi()ns for theJmtire nonattainmentarea.Iy1obileSourc,¢.ernission ,,' "**invelltories~are** .describedin Se<;tion**5~O.** in additionto the MidWestRPQ?s**estimates~;'emissions** 'were projected based upon the state\Vide EGU NO"budgets from'the Indiana

## N0xruJe for affected sources. 

### Graph 4.8 Comparison of2003, 2011 

### and 2020 

### Projected VOC Emissions for Clarkand Floyd ,Counties VOC Tons per Sum m er Day

Clark and floyd Counties

(T0 n s per Sum mer Day) 35 .,-----------------------------, 30**-f------------~----------_==_-_:__--\** 25 

### +----------------------- 20**t--------~-------------­** 15 

## -1----==------------------ 10

5 

### o A rea Nonroad Onroad Point Total 1_2003 m2011 Dl2020 

# I '

. 15

### Graph 4.9 Comparison of2003 Estimated and 2011 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for Entire Nonattainment Area VOC Tons per 8um m er Day Entire Nonattainm ent Area

(T 0 n s per 8 um mer Day)
140 -.---------..,--------------------------, 120 +------------------------- 100 +------------------------:----

80 ;------------------------- 60 ;------------------------- 40 

### -r-:::;;;;:;r==t"I:m-------- 20



### o

.. ",' "''''< ::-'-;:'" ::-",' ';,"
i oo

## '.lJ5120

## 6,3.b 2Q 

### t 1
.

## ~D:1.0 

## 20\20 0,

### Note:t<entuclqf~missi¢n~dcltai~ preliminary

### ~nd subject

# to possible change.

, '
.. .' ",> -.' ,... . ,. . ..' '. 

### Graph 4.10 Comparison of2003, 2011 and 2020 Projected NOx

### Emissions for Clarkand Floyd Counties NOx Tons Per Sum m er Day

Clark and Floyd Counties

(T 0 n s per 8 u m mer 0 a y) 60**,.-------------------------'----:---:-----~** 50 

### +-------------------------- 40 ;--------,-------------------- 30 

### ;-----------------------===--- 20 

### +------------:.-- 10 

### +-------------
A rea Nonroad Onroad Point Total 1&12003 CJ2011 °m2020 

# I

16

### Graph 4.11 Comparison of2003 Estimated and 2011 and 2020 Projected NOx 

### Emissions for Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Tons Per Summer Day Entire Non a tta in men tAre a (Tons per Summer Day)
250 .,.-------------------------------...., 200 i------------------------- 150**i--------~-......:...---------------;** 100 +----------------,==------

50 i----------------,



### o .,·A rell.

• Note: rKen'tuckyefuissions data.ispfeliminary·and subject:toposSil>le change.

. ' _.- -. , - , . . .! , ::**;;,~. >~:.**  

### TABLE 4.1 CompariSo:J} of2003 and 2020 ProjectedEmission Estimates inTons per' SummerDay, Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana

VOC 2003 29.26 51.77 

### 2020 27.91 38.10 

### Chan e -1.35 -13.67 

### 0./0 

### Chan e -4.61 -26.40 

### TABLE 4.2 Comparison of2003 and 2020 Projected EmiSsion Estimates in 

### Tons per SummerDay for Entire NonattainmentArea

VOC 2003 133.11 

### 2020 110.97 

### Chan e -22.14 

### % 

### Chan e -16.66 

### NOx 238.77 126.25 -112.52 -47.12

Note: Kentucky,emissions data is preliminary and subject to possible change. 

### VOC emissions within Clark and Floyd Counties are projected to decline by nearly 5% between 2003 and 2020. VOC emissions within the entire nonattainment area are projected to decrease by over 16%. Areas source emissions, and, to a lesser extent, point sources show an increase due to expectations thatpopulation will grow considerably inClarkand Floyd Counties. 

### 17NOx emissions within Clark and Floyd Comities are projected to decrease by over 26% between 2003 and 2020. NOx emissions within the entire nonattainrnent area are projected to decrease by over47%. In 2003, mobile sources comprised over 58% ofthe inventory. Emjssion reduction benefits from U.S. EPA rules covering the NOx SIP Call, Tier 2 Motor Vehicle Emissions S.tandards and Gasoline Sulfur Control Requirements\ Highway Heavy-Duty Engine Rules and Non-Road Diesel Engine Rule6 are factored into the changes. Further, due to implementation of the NOx SIP Call across the eastern United States, NOxand ozone levels entering this area will also decrease. The Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), issued in March 2005·and to be implemented in ·Iate 2006, will reduce regional EGU NOx emissions by approximately another 15% in 2015. Since CAIR is a regional cap and trade program, it cannot be predicted at this time what effect this will have on EGU units located in Floyd County or other upwind counties. Therefore, potential reductions are not included in Graph 4.6 or Table 4.1. 4.4 Demonstration ofMaintenance Ambient airquality data from all monitoring sites indicate that air quality in Clark arid Floyd Counties met the NAAQS for ozone in 2005. Furthennore,ambient air quality data from aU monitoring sites within the entire nonattainrnent'area iridicatethat

### airquality met the NAAQSfor ozonein 2005.

### U.S.EPA'sRedesi~natidnGuidance (p:age 9) states, "A state'may generally
.

.demonstrate maintenance ofthe NAAQS**byei~er$hQml1g that.fi!~ureemissionsofap<:)llutant**  Qfits precursots will.not exceed the level

### ~ftheattaimli~nt inveritoiy, orby lllodelingio show' that thefuture mixofsourqes andemiss'ionsrat¢swilhnot cause a viqlation ofthe NAAQS." ...•..... Emissions projections outlined in

### Section4.0ofthisdocum~nt clearly illustrate.that.VOCand .', NOx emissions will continue to decline between the years of2003 (base year) and 2020. The NOx SIP rule will result in majorreductions ofEGU emissions (see Section 6.3). Section 7.0 further discusses the implications ofthese emissions trends and provides an analysis to support these conclusions. Therefore, airquality should meet the ozone NAAQS through the projected yearof2011 and 2020
.

. In Indiana, majorpoint sources in all counties are required to submit air emissions infonnation

once every three (3) years or annually, ifVOC potential to emit is greater than 250 tons orNOx greater than 2500 tons, in accordance with the Emission Statement Rule, 326 lAC 2-6. IDEM

.prepares.a new periodic inventory for all ozone precursor emission sectors every three (3) years. These ozone precursorinventories will be prepared for 2005,2008, and 2011, as necessary, to comply with the inventory reporting requirements established in the CAM. Emissions information will be'compared to the 2003 base year and the 2020 projected maintenance year inventories to assess emission trends, as necessary, to assure continued compliance with the ozone standard.

4
. . .

http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstrIEPA-AIRI2000lFebruarylDay-lO/a19a.htm 5 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstrIEPA-AIRl1997/0ctoberlDay-21/a27494.htm 6 http:(/www.epa.gOV/fedrgstrIEPA-AIRI1998/0ctOberlDaY-23/a24836.htm I84.5 Pennanent and Enforceable Emissions Reductions Permanent and enforceable reductions ofvolatile organic compounds and oxides ofnitrogen ' have contributed to the attainment ofthe 8-hourozone standard. Some ofthese reductions were due to the application ofRACT rules and some were due to the application oftighter federal standards on new vehicles. Also, Title IV ofthe Clean Air Act and the NOx SIP Call required the reduction ofoxides ofnitrogen from affected sources. Section 6.0 identifies the emission control measures specific to Clark and Floyd Counties, as well as the implementation status ofeach measure. 4.6 Provisions for Future Updates As required by Section 175A(b) ofthe CAAA, Indiana commits to submit to the Administrator, eight (8) years afterredesignation, an additional revision ofthis SIP. The revision will contain Indiana's plan for maintaining the national primary ozone air quality standard for ten (10) yea:-s beyond the firSt ten (l0) yearperiod after redesignation.


### 5.0 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY BUDGETS**Th~foJI()wing** isa summary ofthe detailed mobile input and outputcalculationfiles located in Appepgi?,E. ',.
. 

### 5.1 Overview The Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency (KIPDA) is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for Clark and Floyd Counties in Indianaas well as Jefferson, BuIIitt and Oldham Counties in Kentucky. This organization has a travel demand forecasting model that is used to simulate the traffic in the area and is used to predict what that traffic would 

### be like in future years given growth'expectations. The model is used mostly to identifY where travel capacity will be needed and to determine the infrastructure requirements necessary to meet**th~t** need. It is also used to supportthe caicuiation'ofmobile source emissions. The travel demand forecasting model is**use~** to predict the total daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and an EPA software program called MOBILE6 is usedto calculate the emissions per**~ile.** The productofthese two outputs, once combined, is the total amount ofpollution emitted by the onroad vehicles for the particular analyzed area. ' , For the Louisville nonattainment area, a numberofagencies are involved in the emissions ' analysis. The Louisville Metro AirPollution Control District (APCD) is the local airquality agency. Staffatthis agency create the MqBILE6 input'files used to detennine the emission factors for the nonattainment area otherthan Bullitt and OldhamCounties. KIPDA determines the average summer weekday VMT using output from the travel model and the APCD emission factors are used to calculate the emissions for Clark, Floyd and Jefferson (KY) Counties. The Kentucky Division for Air Quality (KYDAQ) determines the emission factors and the 

### final emission totals for**Bulli~** and Oldham Counties using VMT and speed**estim~tes** develop¢ by the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC). 195.2 Emission Estimations Table 5.1 outlines the on-road emission estimates for the entire nonattainment area for the years 2003,2011, and 2020. The 2003 emission estimates are based on the actual travel demand model network for the year 2003. The 2020 emission estimates are based on the travel demand model network projected to exist for 2020 underthe 2030 Transportation Plan. The 2011 emission estimates are interpolated values based on the travel demand model network projected to existfor 2009 and 2012 under the 2030 Transportation Pian. The emission estimates for Bullitt and Oldham Counties have been developed by KYDAQ using VMT and speed datafrom the KYTC. 

### Table'S.1

- Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources 

### 2020 16.89 19.62 

### 2011 25.69 ·47.53 

### 2003 40.97 

### 95.51 Louisville NA Area 

## voe (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) 

### Clark 

### & Floyd subtotal 

## voe (tons/day) NOx (tons/day)

### .CJark:.~ •••

### ·Floyd.·.sUb~9tal ..

### ?io.•.• rr--;--.,....o-;'---"'-+----';-

### -----it-'-~~~ __,



# - -Moe (tons/day)
- - --..

## I--.:......:------~I-'---'---....--.--'---+-"'''---"-~-_''_f .• 

### ;NOx (iohslday)
Table 5.2 contains the 2020 motor vehicle emissions budget for the nonattainment area. 

### Table 5.2

- Mobile Vehicle Emission Budgets 

### 2003 ' 40.97 

### 95.51 2020 22.92 29.46 This document creates a single motorvehicle emissions budget for 2003 for the entire

,nonattainment areathat 4escribes the maximum on-road emissions that cannotbe exceeded, between the years 2003 and 2020. This budget is equal to the on-road emissions calculated for 2003 and is**consist~nt** with the methodology and assumptions'used for the 2020 budget described below. ' This document also creates a 'single motorvehicle emissions budget for 2020 for the entire nonattainment area. This budget can not be exceeded in conformity analyses for the year 2020 or later conformity-analysis years. This budgetincludes the emission estimates calculated for 2020'

. , and an additional margin ofsafety. The safety margins include6.03 tons/day for VOC and 9.84 tons/day forNOx. These correspond to approximately a 36% arid 50% increase from the 2020 on-road emissions, respectively.**Margin~** of-safety are usedto accomniodate the wide array of assumptions that are factored into the calculation process. Since assumptions change overtime, it ,20

.... 

## -_ 

## _-_
..**_------~---_.**

### is necessary to have a margin ofsafety that will accommodate the impact ofrefined assumptions in the process. This budget ensures that the 2020 emissions for both VOC and NOx 

### will be below the nonattainment area's base year emissions shown in Table 4.2. All methodologies, latestplanning assumptions and the safety margins were detennined through the interagency consultation process.



### 6.0 CONTROL MEASURES AND REGULATIONS This section provides specific infonnation on the control measures implemented 

### in Clark and Floyd Counties, including CAAA requirements and additional state or local measures implemented beyond CAAA requirements.
. 6.1 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) As required by Section 172 ofthe CAAA, Indiana in the**mid~** 

### 1990s promulgated rules requiring RACT for VOC emission sources. Local and statewide RACT rules have applied to new/existing' sources locating in Clark and Floyd Counties since that time. The Illdianarules are. found in 326**~AC** 8. The. 

### following is a listing ofapplicable statewiderulys:
. 326 IAC8-1-613t\CTfornon-specific sources 

### 326 lAC 8,,2 Surface Coating EmissionLimitations 326 lAC 8.,') Organic Solve.ntDegreasing Operations 326 lAC 8-4 Petroleum Sources 326 lAC 8-5 Miscellaneous Operation 326 lAC 8-6 Organic Solvent Emission Limitations RACT rules specific to Clark and Floyd Counties are summarized in Section 6.2. 6.2 Implementation oCPast SIP Revisions Clark and Floyd Counties were previously nonattainment underthe I-hour ozone standard. The area met all ofits I-hour SIP obligations, and was redesignated to attainment in Septemberof 2001. All ofthe control measures outlined within the 15% rate ofprogress (ROP) plan have been fully implemented. Since the area was designated nonattainment for ozone under the 8-hour standard 

### in 2004 and its attainment plan is not due until 2007, now that the area has attained the standard, no further 

### SIP revisions are required. The following outlines the measures implemented in association with previous SIP submittals that have resulted in permanent and enforceable emission reductions in Clark and Floyd Counties:

21Fifteen Percent Rate ofProgress (ROP) Plan Indiana's final 15% ROP plan was approved by U.S. EPA onMay 7, 1997. The measures included a mix ofpoint, area, and mobile source control measures: Mandatory Measures: The CAAA mandates certain control measures that may be included in a state's 15% plan. These measures include tighter controls on a number ofcategories ofindustrial and area sources. The mandatory measures that apply to Clark and Floyd Counties and were included in the 15% plan are:

• controls on automobile refinishing operations,

• wood furniture coatings,
• shipbuilding and ship repairoperations,

• architectural and industrial maintenance coatings, and
• volatile organic liquids storage facilities. All ofthese measures have b«m fully adopted and are effective within Clark and Floyd Counties, with the exception ofthe architectural and industrial maintenance coatings rule. US EPA indicated in a September 10, 1993 memo from John Seitz, Director ofAir Quality Planning and Standais, to Regional US EPA Offices, that states may take credit for this federal rule without conducting state rulemaking. The administrative code citations for the state rules are as follows;
.

• ..••.**3261~C** 

### 8-10. Automobile Refinishjng;

• '. 326IAC8-fLwo6d fumittireCoatlngs;
. • 326 lAC 8" 12. Shipbuilding or Ship, Repair ()perations;and,
• , 326 lAC 

### 8-9.**Vol~'tileOrganic** Liquid StorageYessels.' '

, .. , ',_, .',
.. -'" i. ,C' AdditionalMeasures: In orderto achieve the necessary emission reductions, additional measuresvere selected by Indiana for impementation in Clark and Floyd Counties. The additional measures were:



## •



# . • a ban on residential open burning,
• installation ofgas collection and combustion equipment at municipal solid waste landfills, • a ridesharing program, and'
• the installation oftherIilal 'incinerators at a printing facility.in Girk County:



### 22'

-_.-_._-------------_.--_

......

### 6.3 Nitrogen Oxides (N01f) 

### Rule The U.S. EPA NOx 

### SIP Call required twenty-two (22) states to adopt rules that would result in significant emission reductions from large EGUs, industrial boilers, and cement kilns in the eastern United States. Indianaadopted this rule in 200I. Beginning in 2004, this rule will account for a reduction ofapproximately thirty-one percent (31 %) 

### ofall NOx 

### emissions statewide compared to previous uncontrolled years. Twenty-one other states have also adopted these rules. The result is that significant reductions will occurupwind and within the nonattainment area because ofthe number oflarge electric utilities located in southern Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, and Tennessee. U.S. EPA andIDEM performed modeling that indicates this area will attain the 8-hour ozone standard with the implementation ofthe NOx 

### SIP Call. Controls for EGUs formally commencedMay 31, 2004. From Graph 4.3, "Statewide NOx

### Emissions from Electric Generating Units" it can be seen that emissions'covered by this programhave been generally trending downWard since 1998 with largerreduction occurring in 2002 and 2003.' Table 6.1, compiled from data taken from the U.S. EPA Clean Air, Markets website, quantifies the gradual NOx

### reductions that have occurred in Indiana as a result ofTitle IV ofthe Clean Air Act Amendments and the beginning ofthe NOx SIP Call Rule. This cap will stay in place through 2008, at which time the CAIR program Will supersede it. , .. . (-',

### Further~U.S. EPA.has

### r~cently**Publish~dPhase'II:()ft4e** NqxSIP Call,that establishes a budget forjarge (greater**t~an** 1 

### ton .perday**emission~)statioIla,ryin~~malcombustionengines** 

### ...This rule

,

### willdecr~e emissions:statewidefroIIlnaturalgascompressor stations by 4,263 tonS duringthe

, ozone season. This rule

### ~as been adopted and became effective'February 26,2006.

Implementation ofthis rule will be in 2007. 

### TABLE 6.1 Trends in EGU Ozone Season NOx

### Emissions Statewide in Indiana Year NOx 

### Emissions (tons/ozone season) 1997 152,834 1998 159,931 1999 149,827 2000 133,881 ' 2001 136,052 2002**113,99~'** 2003 99,283 2004 66,568 2005 ·55,486 Cap 2004-2015 43,654 2015 and Beyond 39,273


### 23

### 6.4 Measures Beyond Cle<l? Air Act "Requirements Reductions in ozone precursor emissions have occurred, or are anticipated to occur, as a result of federal control programs. These additional control measures' include:
. Tier II 

### Emission Standards for Vehicles and Gasoline Sulfur Standards In February 2000, U.S. EPA finalized a federal rule to significantly reduce emissions from cars and light trucks, including sportutility vehicles (SUVs). Underthis proposal, automakers will be required to sell cleaner cars, and refineries will be required to make cleaner, lower sulfurgasoline. This rule will 

### apply'nationwide. The federal rules will phase in between 2004 and 2009. U.S. EPA has estimated thatNOx

### emission reductions will be approximately seventy·seven percent (77%) for passengercars, eighty-six percent (86%) for smaller SUVs, light trucks, and minivans, and sixty-five to ninety-five percent (65-95%)reductions for larger SUVs, vans, and heaviertrucks. VOC emission
. reductions will be approximately twelve percent (12%) for passenger cars, eighteen percent (18%) for smaller SUVs, lighttrucks, and minivans, and fifteen percent (15%) for larger SUVs, vans, and heaviertrucks. Heayy-DutvDieselEngines •... In July2000, U.S. EPA. issued

## afimH.fulefor Highway He(lVY Duty**Engines,aprogr~ni'** 

### .'····Uthatinclucies·low-sll1fit1".diesel fuel·

### standards, andwiil be**ph~edjn** 

### fr0I? 20Qf.ltilrough,;,<., '< 

### 2007. This

### rule applies t() 

### heJivy-duty gasoline anddiese1tI"uC;ks aIld

### l>~ses.'.qrl~,rul~.wR**"t~sult** 

### in approxlinatelya forty percent (40%) reduction in NO" from diesel fI:l,l9ksiaIld",•.. 

### buses, a large sectorofthe mobile sources NO" 

### inventory.'
. . '. Clean AirNon-Road Diesel Rule In May 2004, U.S. EPA issued the Clean AirNon-Road Diesel Rule. This rule applies to diesel engines used in industries such as construction, agriculture, and mining. It 

### also contains

# a cleanerfuel standard, similar to the highway diesel program. The new standards 

### will cut emissions from non-road diesel engines by overninety percent (90%). Non-road diesel equipment, as described in this rule, currently accounts for forty·seven percent (47%) ofdiesel particwate matter (PM) and twenty-five percent (25%) of nitrogen**~xides** 

### (NO,,) from mobile sources'nationwide. Sulfur levels will be reduced in non-road diesel fuel by ninety-nine percent (99%) from current levels, from approximately three-thousand (3,000) parts permillion (ppm) now to (fifteen) 15 ppm in 20

### IO. New engine standards take effect, basedon engine horsepower, starting in 2008. Together, these rules will substantially reduce local and regional sources ofozone precursors. The modeling analyses discussed in Section 7 include these rules and showthe ozone concentrations expected to result from the**imple~entation** 

### ofthese rules.

246.5 Controls to Remain in Effect Indiana·commits to maintain the control measures necessary to maintain attainmentofthe2lJl)ne standard in Clark and Floyd Counties after**redesignati~n.** Indiana will submit to 

### U.s. EPA as a SIP revision any changes to its rules oremission limits applicable to VOC olNOx sources contained in Indiana's SIP.**Jnd~an~throtigh IDEM~s** **Offi~e** ofAir**Quality~nd** its**Offic~of.E:nforceme.nt,hasthelegafauthoritYand ,;n~~~ss~l)'.resouJ:ces** **toactively~nforce** any.violationsofits rulesior**perIlJitprovis,i~ns:Afterredesigrla:tion,** ,"**.~t intend~to**  continue enforcing al.,1 rules that, relate.tothe emissiopofozonepr:ecuJ:sorsin(;larkand Floyd

. Counties.!
. 6.6 New Source Review Provisions Indiana has a longstanding and fully implemented New Source Review (NSR) progranthat is outlinedin rule 326 lAC 2. The rule includes provisions for the Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program in 326 lAC J.2. Indiana's PSD program was conditionally approved on March 3, 2003 (68 FR 9892) and received approval on May20, 2004 (69 FR 29071) by U.S. EPA as part ofthe SIP. Any facility that is not listed in the 2002 emission inventory, orfor the closing ofwhich credit was tamn demonstrating attainment, will not be allowed to construct, reopen, modify, or reconstruct without meeting 'all**applicabl~** permit rule requirement. The review process will be identical to that used for new sources. Once the area is redesignated, OAQwill implementNSRthrough the PSD prograJt) which requires an air quality analysis to evaluate whetherthe new source will threaten the**N~AQS.** ' 7.0 MODELING Although U.S. EPA's redesignation guidance does riotrequire modeling for ozone nonattainmentareas seeking redesignation, extensive modeling has been performed**coverin~outhem** Indianato determine the effect ofnational emission control strategies on ozone levels. These modeling analysdiave determined that Clark and Floyd Counties are significantly iqoacted by ozone and ozone precursortransport, and regional NO. reductions are an effective way to attain the 8hour standard in this area. Future year modeled ozone concentrations are expected to be reduced by 10% to 20% from baseline design values. Examples ofthese modeling analyses are listed below. 

### 2S7.1 Summary ofModeling- Results for National Emission Control Strategies in Final Rulemakings 

## u.S. EPA Modeling Analysis for HDE Final Rulemaking U.S. EPA conducted modeling for Tier II vehicles and low-sulfur fuels. This analysis was performed in 2000 to support final rulemaking for the Heavy D'uty Engine (HOE) and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel and its expected impact on ozone levels. "Technical Support Document for the Heavy Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements: Air Quality Modeling Analyses" (EPA42o-R-00-028) was referenced in support ofthis ozone redesignation for the two counties. Base year emissions from 1996 were modeled for three ozone episodes: June 12-24, 1995; July 5-15, 1995; and August 7-21, 1995. Results ofthis modeling show that ozone impacts from these fuel emission control measures"as well as the NOx SIP call, would be substantial in Clark and Floyd County. Relative Red1.£tion Factors (RRF) were calculated for each monitor in Clark and Floyd County for future years 2007 and 2020. These RRFs were applied to the three-year (2001-2003) design valuC?s of92.0 ppb in Clark CountY and 86.3 ppb in Floyd County. The resulting future year design values for 2007 and 2020 were calculated and shown below in Table 7.1. The modeled future yeardesign values for all monitors in Clark and Floyd Counties werereducedby 11

### % to 13% ofthe 2001-2003 design values and will attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS of**8~** ppb. 

### ;Table7.1
.. Modeling }tesldts fromU:S. EPAH:DERulentaking for**··;Chl~k** 

### andFI()ydCounti¢s

" "'" , <' 'C',. . ,:":¥,

..,, . '",-,,-, > ';'.!'-'/**"~"~** ',-**~~;v** :"(, :.; (, . y" •i ':**<~** 

### ,;: " ,':'F ," .• Modeled : Modeled' 

### I, '!- I . L Design '<Relative Relative Value Reduction Future Reduction. Future Monitor 2001- Factor Design Factor Design MonitorlD Name County 2003 (RRFs)

. Value (RRFs) Value 2007 Base 2007 2020 Base 2020 180190003 Charfestown Clark 92.0 0.8857 81.5 0.8729 80.3 180431004 NewAlbanv Flovd 86.3 0.8914 77.0 0.8859 76.5 LADCO Modeling Analysis for 8-Hour Ozone Standard Assessment The Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) performed modeling to evaluate the effect ofthe NOx SIP Call and Tier 

### II 

### ILow Sulfurrule for future-year 2007 ozone, which included Clark and Floyd Counties. This modeling was originally designed to assess the I-hour ozone standard. Further analysis was conducted and documented in LADCO's White Paper "8- Hour Ozone Assessment," dated May 2, 2001. Base year design values used were the average of the design values for the three 3-yearperiods(1994-1996, 1995-1997, and 1996-1998). Base year emissions·were taken from 1996 and four ozone episodes were evaluated: June 22-28, 1991; July 14-21, 1991; June 13-25, 1995; and July 7-18, 1995. Results are shown in Table 7.2.

26

### Table 7.2 LADCO Modeling Results for 8-Hour Ozone Assessment Monitor 10 Monitor Base Year Average Future Name County Desian Value (oob) Design Value '94-'96, '95-'97, '96-<98 2007 180190003 Charlestown Clark 93 84 180431004 NewAlbanv Flovd 91 84


### The resulting future year design values were calculated at 84 ppb for Clark County and Floyd County, respectively. The modeled future year design values will attain the 8-hourozone NAAQS of85 ppb with future year concentrations decreasing by 8% to 10%. Base-year**av~rage** 

### design values (1994-1996, 1995-1997, 1996-1998) used in the LADCO modeling were 6 to 8 ppb greaterthan current base-yearaverage design values (2001-2003, 2002-2004, 2003-2005)'for most monitors. Therefore, the modeling results would be even lower ifthe current base year average design values were used. The trend for thedesign values at both monitors has trended downward overthis time period. It 

### should be noted,that thisniodelingwas conducted in the year 2000 and used 1996 emission inventories. More recentmodeling uses updated emission inventories from 2002 with revised**~owth** 

### facforsand,**contr0lr~ductions** 

### for future year modeling purposes, as 

### weRas .' ...•..

### photochemiC~lI. modeling updates'that bettercharacterize
..

### ozone·formation~d;trartspori.:Thes~i**fa~tors'w9tiI,d~c2~urit f(){tl1edifferenc~s**  bet\veep the oldermodeling reslllts

### ~d curreri(?'
. modelingJor**theNO~** 

### SIP

### calland 

### tAlR. " " .' 7.2 Summary ofModelirig Results to Support Rulemakings 

## u.s. EPA Modeling for Clean AirInterstate Rule (CAIR), 2005



## . , , 

### On March 10,2005, the U.S. EPA finalized the Clean AirInterstate Rule (CAIR). NO" emissions from powerplants will be cut by 1.7 million tons by 2009 and emissions will be reduced by 1.3 million tons in 2015 in 28 eastern states and the District ofColumbia. Compared to a 2003 ' baseline, Indianawill reduce NOx emissions by 113,000 tons by 2009 and 149,000 tons by 2015. 

## U.s. EPA performed modeling to support the associated emission reductions. The modeling was based on 1999

- 2003 design values. Future yearmodeling was conducted, including Clark and Floyd Counties, and the future yeardesign values for 2010 and 2015 were evaluated for attainment ofthe 8-hour ozone NAAQS, as shown below in Table 7.3. This future year modeling excluded reductions associated with the State ofIndiana's vehicle**ins~ction** 

### and maintenance program currently in place in Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana Results ofthe 

### CAIRmodeling show that both counties will attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS in 2010 with modeled concentrations'reduced by.10 % to 12% and remain below 85 ppb. With further reductions projected in CAIRfor 2015, all design values continue to decrease by 16% to 18% and continue to attain the 8-hourozone NAAQS.

27

.......

## __._---------------'

### Table 7.3 Modeling Results from U.S. 

### EPA for the Clean Air Interstate Rule Design Value Future Future County MSNCMSA [ppb). Desiqn Value Desion Value 1999-2003 2010 with CAIR 2015 with CAIR Clark Louisville 89.3 78.4 73.5 Flovd Louisville 83.7 75.2 70.3

LADCO modeling for Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAlR) LADCO conducted modeling in March of2006 to determine the impact ofCAIR in the Midwest. The modeling was based on 2000-2004 design values. Future year modeling for 2009 and 2012 was conducted and the future year design values were determined, as shown below in Table 7.4. 

### Table 7.4 LADCO's Round 4 Modeling Results for the Clean Air Interstate Rule**.·B~secase** Basecase Monitor Design Value ,withCAJR- with CAIRMonitorlD Name County 2000-2004 2009 2012 '. ... .... (pob)
. Jppb) 

### . (oob) 180190003
. Charlestown Clark 90.0 182.5 '. . 79,2 .' ." , 180431004
. NewAlbany "Floyd'**84;.~** . ......• 77.4
...... 75.7

,.... , , ., i 

### '.' 

## .'

,'.RestlltsofLADCO's most recent

## CAIR**rh~deiil1g** show Glarka'nd Floyd CoUnties will atfum 

### the

8-hour ozone NAAQS of85 ppb in 2009. Future yearmodeled ozone concentrations for**~009** 

### will be 8% lower than baseline ozone design values and 12% lower in 2012. Ozone concentrations are predicted to continue to decrease and remain in attainment ofthe 8-hour ozone NAAQS of85 ppb. 7.3 Summary ofExisting Modeling Results U.S. EPA and LADCO modeling for future year design values have consistently shown that existing national emission control measures will bring Clark and Floyd Counties into attainment ofthe 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Rulemakings to be implemented in the next several years will provide even greater assurance that airquality will continue to meet the standard into the future. Modeling support for the NOx SIP Call, Heavy Duty Engine and Highway Diesel Fuel and Tier IIlLow SulfurFuel and Clean Air Interstate Rule has shown that future yeardesign values for Clark and Floyd Counties will attain the ozone standard with modeled future year design values below 85 ppb. U.S. EPA has modeled base case future years with existing emission controls only**~d** shown that Clarkand Floyd**Counti~s.** will attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS without**addit~onal** national emission control strategies. Future natigl1al and local emission control strategies will ensurethat each county's attainment will 

### be maintained with an increasing margin ofsafety overtime.
.

28 

### '----..,...----------------------------------------------_.

__.-7.4 Temperature 'Anaiysis for Clark and Floyd County Meteorological conditions are one ofthe most important factors that influence ozone development and transport. A temperature analysis has been conducted to detennine how the temperatures during the ozone conducive months ofApril, May, June, July, August, September and Octobercompare to nonnal temperatures for the Southern Indiana. Temperature infonnation was taken from the Charlestown Ordinance Plant in Clark County, Indiana and National Weather Service Station at Standiford International Airport in Louisville, Kentucky. A**vailabl~** nonnal maximum temperatures by summer months from 1971-2000 for the Southern Indi.anal Louisville, Kentucky area are as follows: April

- 66.8° F**May~75.4°F** June

- 83.3° F July

- 87.0° F August

- 85.8° F September

- 79.4° F October-68.4° F May

- September

- 82.2°'F Louisville-'S Il10nthlymID(irI1Ufiltemperaturesfor the 'previous 8 years (1998--"2e05)'

### dUri~gthe sUnunet mpnths are comPared to nonnalsummermonth temperatures in**Table75~** Overall, the;':; temperatures duringthe'l998; 1999,2002

### and~005 swpmer:ffiollths ofMay,

### June~**JlliY,1\~gust,** and September

### were2%:t~4 %

### ·~~9v~!1o.~alWhil,e,t~I~lPeratures ..duringthe

### 2000,'2001, 2003, " 

### and 2004 sUmmer months were; at nOrInal or 1% lower than the**nonn~l** temperatures. Table 7.5 shows the average temperatures in Southern Indiana for each ofthe past eightyears andthe percent difference from nonnal for each year. Table 7.5 Analysis 'ofMaximum, Temperatures for ClarkIFloyd Counties (Percent Change from Maximum Temperature

## COF) Nonnals (1971- 2000» Normal 1998 1999 2000 2001

Max Max % Max % Max % Max % Aoril 68.0 64.0 -4 67.6 , +1 65.7 -2 72.6 +9 Mav 77.2 78.8 +5 78.1 +4 78.7 +4 77.6 +3 June 84.7 82.7 -1 82.8 -1 83.8 +1 82.4 -1 July 88.5 84.1 -3 91.9 +6 84.6 -3 86.6 0 August 87.2 86.4 +1 88.6 +3 85.4 0 87 +1 September 80.6 86.5 +9 85.4 +8 77.4 -3 77.5 -2 October 70.1 70.6 +3 70.7 +3 73.2 +7 68.8 +1 AVE. Mav-5ept. 83.6 83.7 +2 85.4 +4 82 0 82.2 0 AVERAGE April-Oct. 79.S 79.0 +l 80.7 +3' 78.4 +1 78.9 +1

29Normal 2002 2003 2004 2005 Max Max °/0 Max % Max % Max 0/0 April 68.0 69.5 +4 69.9 '1-5 69.2 +4 69.1 +3 May 71.2 73.3 -3 74.5 

### -I 80.7 +7 75.3 0 June 84.7 85 +2 80.3 -4 84.8 +2 86.3 +4 July'
. 88.5 88.7 +2 86.3 

### -I 86.1 -I 88.4 +2**Au~ust** 87.2 88.9 +4 83.0 -3 76.8 -10 90.1 +s September 80.6 83.4 +5 82.0 +3 77.9 -2 84.0 +6 October 70.1 63.7 -7 70.3 +3 69.5 +2 70.5 +3 AVE. May-S.ept. 83.6 83.8 +2 81.2 -1 81.3 -1 84.8 +3 AVERAGE April-Oct. 79.5 78.9 +1 78.0 0 77.9 0 80.5 +3
The number ofdays with temperatures of90° F and higher was collected from the National Weather Service Station at Standiford International Airport and compared to the nonnal number ofdays collected from the Charlestown ORD Plant in Clark County, Indiana and calculated from 1971.through 2000. The average number of90° F and higher days for the**Loui~vill~** area is35.2. Table 7.6shc)'ws'acomparisonof8-hour ozone exceedances andtemperatures '-YlJ.He Graph?2**~hQW~th~** cQrrelation graphically. .;""". 

### '. "', ':<i



### .Table 7.6 

### Comparison of**Day~** 

### with 90° F and**8-H~ur** 

### Oion,: Exceedance.**n~Y'$)**

., • . ..•. " ". .'.' .",::'c." •.• , .'. Numberof 1)3 s with**Telnperatures~r90o** Fand hi her .' ". 

### "1 Nonnal 

### I 1995 11996 19971 1.998 11999 12000 1 2001 200212003 20041 2005 # of90° F days 1**~5.2** 1 37 

### I 25 25 1 26 1 4S 

### I. 14 1 21 40 

### I 17 ·19 1 50 Number or8-Hour Exceedance Davs at Clark/Flovd Counn and Louisville area ozone monitors Monitor Co'unty 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002' 2003 2004 2005 Charlestown Clark 18 2 10 22 II 4 4 17 4 0 3 New Albany Floyd 14 16 3 14 to 0 0 . 13 4 0 2

,/



### 30

1.-..
... _...

### Graph 7.1 Comparison ofDays with 900 

### F and 8-Hour Ozone Exccedance Days
Com parison of Hum ber of gooF days Hd a·hour Ozone Exceadanee Days 55**-.----,...,-...,...,.,.~-.....,..-.,.,---:--,-_.,_--_.._,,...,,.,..,,.,,...,,.,.,.....___._~_.,__,__=_...,...,** 50**+-+:"":';"~~~~~;¥"'+~~~~~4i!,.~~** 45**€..,..,..,..*-=~:.:.:.:f.''-+.-'~~~~~~~~~+** 40 35 :30


# - =25**~20** :; 15 .0 el0 5 

## o .." <0 

### ..... <0 0> C> C"I ...... ..... .." 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> C> C> C> C> C> C> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> C> C> <::> C> C> C> C"I 

### ..... C"I C"I ..... 

### ..... Year -+-90. F Days

___Charle stow n -.-N ew Albany

As c@**bese~n;** ,a.greaternumberofozoneexceedancedays per·yearcorrelate with a greater· nW11ger,of90oP <tays peryear. The**effects9fnation,dcontI:olme~ures appear'~iphave**  an. impa,Q!;on

### t~enllIllber ofozone

### ~xceeqance days

### per:y~ar.]hisiseyid,entjrithat'2005·had a<

### grea.~er;nwnb~r**?fdays~th** temperatm-es Qf90°F or:

### lIlore·tiutthe

### nllIll~t; of8::pOur

### exc~c@1ce, days

### "was

## tQ:W: ,\Vl1ile othermeteorological factqrsplay. haye influenced

### this tOSOllle

### ~¢gree~'it1; "'appears that the loweremissions helped to keep 8-hour

### ~xceedance'days lowerduring the ozoneconducive conditions of2005. 7.5 Summary ofMeteorological Conditions The analysis ofthe departure·from normal ofthe maximum temperatures during the summer months shows variation in the number of90° F days peryear 

### as illustrated in Table 

### 7.6. The analysis shows that 30 ormore days with temperatures of9(fF and higher occurred in 1995, 1999, 2002 and 2005. The number of8-hour ozone exceedance days for those years shows a greater correlation to the number ofhighertemperature days.**Howev~r,** the years with a lesser numberof90° F days still yielded 8-hourozone exceedance days. Ozone formation in the future 

### will be influenced less by meteorological conditions. Lower ozone values correspond to lowered local and regional ozone precursoremissions. This is why U.S. EPA developed the 8-hour standard 

### as a 4th high ozone value averaged over 3 years to account for variations 

### in temperanrre. Despite such variations, ozone values in Clark and Floyd counties have steadily decreased since 1995
..

318.0 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 8.1 Commitment to Revise Plan As noted**~n** Section 4.6 above, Indiana hereby commits to review its Maintenance Plan eight(8) years after redesignation, as required by Section 175(A) ofthe CAAA. 8.2 Comrilitmentfor Contingency Measures Indiana hereby commits to adopt and implementexpeditiously necessary corrective actions in the following circumstances: Warning Level Response A Warning Level Response shall be prompted whenever an annual (I-year) fourth high monitored value of.089 ppm occurs in a single ozone season, or a two (2)-yearaverage fourth high monitored value 0t085**p~s** per million (ppm) or greater occurs within Indiana's portion ofthemaintenaricearea.A Warning Level Response will consist ofa study to .detennine whether the ozone value indicates a trend toward higher ozone values**or'Yhet~eremissions** appeart9beincreasing. Thestudy\Villevaluate\Vhetherthe trend, ifany,

### i~**li~elytcicontinueifUl8,'if~0,**the"cotlu-0l

### me~ures necessary

# to reverse the

### ~pd @cipg

### i~t()**co~i4~ra.~ion easeWUt~tifuing'forimplementation,** **~wdl~** econoIlllc

## anq'/ $6cial c"nsideratipns.

### Irnplem~ntation 'ofnecess¥y controlsin &spoilSe t<ra\Vatning:,i " Level**Respons~tligger.** wiUta}(e pJaceasexpeditiouslY as,possible, but in

## hoi event later than twelve (12) months from the'concJusionofthe most recent ozone season (September 30). Should it 

### be detenninedthrough the Warning L.evel study that action is necessary to reverse the noted trend, the procedures for control**selectio~** and implementation outlined under "Action Level Rel)ponse" shall be followed. Action Level Response 

### An Action Level Response shall be prompted whenever a violation ofthe standard (three (3)-yearaverage fourth high monitored value of.085 parts per million (ppm) orgreater) occurs within the maintenance 

### area. In the event that the Action Level 

### is triggered and is not found to be due to an exceptional event, malfunction, or**noncompli~ce** with a pennit condition orrule requirement, IDEM willdetennine additional control measures needed ,to assure future attainment ofNAAQS for ozone. In this case, measures that can be implemented in a short time will 

### be selected in orderto 

### be in place within eighteen (18) months from the close ofthe ozone season that prompted the Action Level.

32Control Measure Selection and Implementation Adoption ofany additional control measures is subjecttcthe necessary administrative and legal process. This process will include publication ofnotices, an opportunity fopublic hearing, and other measures required by Indiana law for rulemaking by state·environmental boards
.

.Ifa new measure/control isalready promulgated and scheduled tobe implemented at the federalor state level, and that measure/control is determind to be sufficientto addressthe upward trend in air quality, additional local measures may be unnecessary.Furthermore, Indiana will submit to U.S. EPA an analysis to demonstratethe proposed measures are adequate to return the area to attainment. 8.3 Contingency Measures Contingency measures to be considered will be selected from a comprehensive list ofmeasures deemed appropriate and effective at the time the selection is made. Listed below arexample measuresthat may.be considered. The selection cfmeasures will be based upon costeffectiveness, emission reduction potential, economic and social considerations or other factors that IDEM deems appropriate. IDEM will solicit input from all interested and affected persons in the maintenance area prioto selecting appropriate contingency measures. All ofthe listed coritingencymeasures are potentially effective or proven methods ofobtaining significant reductions ofozone precursoremissions
.. Because it is not possible at this time to determine wha,t control measure. will be**appropriate~t** an llnspecified time in the future, the listofcontingency measures outlined below is not.c;omprehensive.lndiana anticipatesthatif**anyconting~ncymeasures**; shollidever be

### neces~ary, itis unlikelythat a significannumber (i.e., all

### th~se Jistedbelow)will be**'req~irea.~** 

## . .. ," "',**'~**
2) Broadergeographic applicability ofexisting measures. 3) Tighten RACT on existing sources covered by U.S. EPA Contol Technique Guidelines issued in response to the 1990 CAAA. 4). Apply RACT to smallerexisting sources. 5) One ormore transportation control measures sufficient to achieve at least halfa percent (0.5%) reduction in actual area wide VOC emissions. TranspaJtation measures will be selected from the following based upon the factors listed above afterconsultation with affected local governments: a) Trip reduction programs, including, but not limited to, employed>ased transportation management plans, area widerideshare programs, work schedule changes, and telecommuting. b) Transit improvements.



### 33Traffic flow**improvements~** c) Other new or innovative transportation measures not yet in widespread use that affects state and local governments deemed appropriate. 6) Alternative fuel and "diesel retrofit,programs for fleet vehicle operations. 7) Controls on consumerproducts consistent with those adopted elsewhere in the United States. 8) Require VOC orNOx emission offsets for new and modified major sources.. 9) Require VOC or NOx emission offsets for new and modified minor sources. 10)Increase the ratio ofemission offsets required for new sources. 11)Require VOC orNOx controls on new minor sources (less than 100 tons).

j,:'

..**~\!~l** {{ :.:":;:.,'«><" ;'

. '"**',~;~ '-~.** 

"c·-','·'-'" "**%i,;~f:':; "'~"**  '}} No c(:mtingency**measur~** shall be implemented without providingthe opportunityfor full public
'.........•••....participation during which the relative costs and benefits ofindividual measures;,atthetime they**,~,;1("';'~,j** areupderconsideration,;caribe

### fully evaluated.;'
.**--~**

In accordance with Section 100 (a) (2) ofthe CAAA, notice ofavailability ofthe ozone redesignation documents and the time and date'ofthe public hearing was published in the Indianapolis Star. (Indianapolis, Inqiana} The NewA!bany Tribune, (New Albany, Indiana) and The Jeffirsonville EveningNews (Jeffersonville, Indiana) for the Indianaportion ofthe Louisvme nonattainment area (Clark and Floyd Counties) on May 15,2006. The public hearing to receive comments onthe redesignation requestwas held on June 14,2006, at Indiana University Southeast inthe MUlti-Purpose Room, located at 4201 Grant Line'Road, in New Albany, Indiana. The public commentperiod closed oil June 21, 2006. A sumniary ofthe comments received and IDEM's responses thereto are included in Appendix D as part ofthe submittal to the U.S. ErA. Appendix D also includes 

## acopy ofthe public notice,**certifi~tions** of publication, and.the transcript.fromthe public hearing. '

10.0 CONCLUSIONS Clark and Floyd Counties, along with the remaining portion ofthe Louisville basic ozone nonattainment 

### area, have attained theNAAQS' standard for ozone. This petition**demon~trates** that Clark and Floyd CoUnties have complied with the applicable provisions ofthe 1990 

### 34Amendments to the Clean AirAct regarding redesignation ofbasic ozone nonattainment areas. IDEM has prepared a State Implementation and Maintenance Plan that meets the requirement of Section 110 (a) (I) ofthe 1990 Clean AirAct. Indiana has performed an analysis that shows the air quality improvements are due to permanent and enforceable**measures~** In addition, significant regional NOxreductions will ensure continued compliance (maintenance) with the standard and that all CAAA requirements necessary for redesignation have been met. Indiana has performed an analysis that shows the air quality improvements are due to permanent and enforceable measures and that significant regional NOxreductions following implementation ofPhase II NOx and CAIR will ensure continued compliance (maintenance) with the standard. Based on this presentation, Indiana's portion ofthe nonattainment area (Clark and Floyd
. Counties) meets the requirements for redesignation under the CAA (Section 107 (d)(3» and U.S. EPA guidance. Furthermore, because this area is subject to significant transport ofpollutants, significant regional NOxreductions will ensure continued compliance (maintenance) with the standards with an increasing margin ofsafety. Consistent with the authority granted to the U.S. EPA, the State ofIndiana hereby requests that Clark andFloyd .counties beredesignated to attaillll1ent simultaneously with 

### U.s. EPA approval· : of the Illdiana Statt:JmplementationandryIaintenance Plan provisions

### con~ed herein.'
.



# 35

### 36

# APPENDIX A Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Data

UNITED STATES ENVRONMefTAi. PROTECllON AGENCY AIR QUAlITY SYSlEM QUICKIDOKREPORT (AAP450) Dec. 28. 2005

PPt.l(001) VAlJD HUM 1ST 2ND 3RO 4TH DAY DAYS DAYS MAX MAX MAX MAX l&l\X>lMEAS REO ll->iR a.HR 8-HR e-HR 0.085 CERT EDT 182 183 0.096 0.092 0.092 0.09 4 Y 0 182 liD 0.06 0.078 0.076 0.074 0 0 173 163 0.096 0.092 0.066 0.06
. 3 0 183 183 0.097 0.097 0.092 0.086
. 4 'Y 0 175 183 0.079 0.078 0.077 O.On 0,' 0'. 172 163 0_ 0.066 0.061 0.06 • 2 • "0' REP ORO CITY COUNTY AOORESS YEAR ME7H %OIlS 520 CIa<1t AAMYAMIAINI1ION PIA 2003 47 99 520 ChaI1_ CIa<1t AAMY AMlAlNiTION PIA 2004 47 99 520 ChafI

.._ Clor. AAMYAMMUNITION PLA 47 95 520

# __ Floyd 2230 GREEN VIUEY R 2003 47 100 520 Now_ Floyd 2230 GREENV.lUEY R 2004 47 96

.. 520 

### .... Floyd 2230 GREEN V.lUEY R 2005 47 84 11l-01HOO3 I 18-019-0003· I 18-019-0003 1 18-043-1004 1 18-043-1004 I 1&-043-1004
. ·1 EXCEPlIONAl. DAll>. TYPES EDT OESCRIP1ION
. o NOEVENTS 1 EVENTS EXCLUDED 2 EVENTS INCUJOED 3 EXCEPllONALEVENTS EXCLUDeD 4 NATURALEVENTS EXCLUDED 5 EVENtS v.mi CONCURRENCE EJCLUOED 6 EXCEPlIONALEVENTS WITH CONCURRENCEEXCLUDED 7 NATURAL EVENTS IMTHCONCIJRRENCE ElCLUOED Note: The • indicates 0l8t Cho meal doe$ IftOt Mtiafy DUnVnery afterl8.**p~** 2 of5 (J UNITED STATES EMI1RONMENi\LPR<1rECTlONAGENCY AIRClUAUTY SYSlEM QUICKIDOKREPORT (AMP45O) 020n0 (44201)
. In<ian.

Il-tlOUR p o SlTEID C 

## I 

## I .1

0.1 

### -r------------------------, 0.095 -l--------------------------1

NewAlbany 18-043-1004 Charlestown 18-019-0003 

# Ih

U }h14th Hi91:l

....

## aHour Standard 

# I

A-I

## Four Highest Daily Values 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 2003-2005 SITE 10 COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR %OBS 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR AVERAGE 18-019-0003 CLARK CHARLESTOWN 2003 99 0.096 0.092 0.092 0.090 18-019-0003 CLARK CHARLESTOWN 2004 99 0.08 0.078 0.076 0.074 18-019-00.03 CLARK CHARLESTOWN 2005 95 0.098 0.092 0.086 0.080 0.081 18-043-1004 FLOYD NEWALBANY 2003 100 0.097 0.097 0.092 0.086 18-043-1004 FLOYD NEWALBANY 2004 . 96 0.079 0,078 0.077 0.071 18-043-1004 FLOYD NEWALBANY 2005 94 0.092 0.086 0.081 0.080 0.079



## . Annual 4th 

## High'Values Year' Annual S-hrValues City 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Charlestown .100 .081 .097 .104 .089 .085 .086 .100 .090 .074 .080 NewAlban .094 .092 .084 .100 .094 .077 .076 .097 .086 .071 .080 

## lIistpriq. Design Values

0.096 0;092 0.086 0.090,; 0.092,. 0.092 0.090 0.082 0.083 0:000

0.1**,-----------~-----__,** 0.095**-t---"""~--------~---:__-__f** 

# ! 0.09**+------"ll~--_::tIIr"'_--__3lllIl..,.__---__1** 

### "" 

### 8- 0.085

# +------........--------.r----J X 0.08**+----------------~__1** 0.075**-t--~--_r_-__r--_r_-___,.---:-..,.--___f** 97-99 9!3-00 99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 

# l

......oesign Value -S Hour NAAQS 

# I

A-2

# Local Monitoring (Design Value) Data for Bullitt, Jefferson, and Oldham Counties, Kentucky 2003-2005

, 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 2003-2005 SITEID COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR %OBS 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR AVERAGE 21-029-0006 BULL/TT SHEPHERDSVILLE 2003 99 0.076 0.073 0.072 0.072 21-029-0006 BULLITT SHEPHERDSVILLE 2004 97 0.102 0.078 0.070 0.068 21-029-0006 BULLITT SHEPHERDSVILLE 2005 97 0.083 0.081 0.081 0.080 0.073 21-111-0027 JEFFERSON (NOT IN A CITYI 2003 100 0.096 0.082 0.076 0.072 21-111-0027 JEFFERSON (NOT IN A clm 2004 98 0.093 0.071 0.071 0.070 21-111-0027 JEFFERSON (NOT IN A CITY] 2005 100 0.083 0.079 0.079 0.079 0.074 21-111-0051 JEFFERSON LOUISVILLE 2003 100 0.084 0.081 0.079 0.075 21-111-0051 JEFFERSON LOUISVILLE 2004 96 0.073 0.071 0.071 0.070 21-111-0051 JEFFERSON LOUISVILLE 2005 100
. 0.091 0.086 0.086 0.085 0.077 21-111-1021 JEFFERSON LOUISVILLE 2003 100 0.081 0.079 0.074 0.073 21-111-1021 JEFFERSON LOUISVILLE 2004 100 0.072 0.071 0.069 0.068 21-111-1021 JEFFERSON LOUISVILLE 2005 100 0.088 0.084 0.076 0.074 0.072 21-185-0004 OLDHAM BUCKNER 2003 100 0.088 0.085 0.082 0.082 21·185-0004 OLDHAM BUCKNER 2004· 99 0.078 0.077 0.076 0.076 21-185-0004 OLDHAM BUCKNER 2005 100 0.094 0.094 0.093 0.089 0.082 '.
" ",', . ,

0.085**-l--~~----~------"r------~-----,6r----j**
0.080**+---------..:.---~--------------**
0.075 

### +-------------

0.070

0.065 SHEPHERDSV ILLE INO TIN A CITY) 21·029·0006
. 21·111·0027 LOUISVILLE 21·111-0051 LOUISV ILLE 21·111·1021 BUCKNER 21·185·0004**Ir:z?llll.I2003'200~** Design Value -.-8·hour Standard 

# I

A-3A-4

# APPENDIXB Emissions Inventories

1996 1999 

### 2002 2003 63.59 55.64 .57.59

51'.76 34.86 34.48 

### 32.69 29.26

70 60 50 40 30 20 10



### o NOx Em issions· All Sources Clark and Floyd Counties

(T 0 n s per Sum mer 0 a y)

1996 1999 IIZlNOX 

# I 2002 2003

VOC Em issions· All Sources Clark and Floyd Counties

(T 0 n s per Sum mer 0 a y) 40 30 20 10



## o 29.26

1996 1999 2002 

## Imvoc 

# I

B-1 2003**~---------------------_.**



### 1996 1999 2002 2003 

### 4.99 6.19 5.85 4.17
NOx Point Source Em issions Clark and Floyd Counties

(T"o ns per Sum mer 

### 0 ay)

VOC**PointS~urce** 

### Emissions Clark and Floyd Counties

(Tons 

### per Su·m m 

### er Day)



### 1996 1999 ·2002 2003 

# Imvoc 

# I

B-2"



## 1990 1999 

## 2002 ,2003 337.79 322.54 ' 156.48 148.51 

## 251.17 217.59 229.20 223.25

NOx Em issions,· All Sources

Entire Nonatta inm ent Area

(T 0 n s per Sum mer 0 a y )

1999

### I~NOx ,

.VOC Em issions· All Sources

Entire Nonattainm ent Area

(1 0 n s per Sum mer 0 a

### y) 

### 260 240 

## 220 200 217.59 

## 223**.2~**


### 1996 1'999 

## 2002 2003 lE81VO C 

# I

B-3

### 2003 

### 37.25. 

### 61.70: 64.96

2002



### B-4 

# .lavoc 

# I 1999, 

### ImNOX

# I

1999 

### P0 

### in t 

### V0C Tre nds Entire N0

## iuttain men t 

### Are·a

(10 

### ns per Sum me'r 0a y). 144.06

1996 

### " ",. V 1./ V v .v v

• AA**.~** 

### 37.25 .vv 

### 88S 80 60 40 20



# o

# STATEWIDE EGU NOx TRENDS

Year NOx Tons per Ozone Season 

### 1999 149,827 2000 133,881 2001 136,052 2002 113,996 2003 99,283 2004 66,568 2005 55,486

160,000 -r-'------,-----------'----'---------, 140,000**+--~t-'-----'-----'---__,__------~--'-I** . ..' 120,000

. 100,000 80,000 60.000 40.000 20.000 

### o 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 

# 1mNOx Tons per Ozone Season 

# I

B-5

### · B-6

# APPENDIXC 2011 and 2020 Projected Eniissions Inventory Clark and Floyd Counties
Sector 

### NOX NOX NOX 2003 2011 2020 Area 1.60 1.71 1.80 Non-road 5.63 4.43 3.49 On-road 20.27 10.20 4.15

Point 24.26 27.29 28.66 Total 51.77 43.63 38.10 Sector 

# voe voe voe 2003 2011 2020 Area 11.94 12.77 14.59 Non-road 3.55 2.35 2.20 On-Road 9.60 6.12 3.98 Point 4.17 6.61 7.14 Total 29.26 27.85 27.91

NOx Tons Per Sum m er Day

Clark and Floyd Counties

(T 0 n s per Sum mer Day)
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 A rea Nonroad Onroad Point Total 1132003 020n m2020 ,



### C-lTotal Poinl 

## onroad



### (;-2 IB2003 0201192020 

### I Nonroad Area VOC Tons per Sum mer Day Clark and Floyd Counties

(T 0 ns per Sum mer 0 ay) 35 ,---------------.:..-------------, 30 -1---------------------------:==-------1 25 -1--------------------"----- 20 -l------------------------ 15 

### r=:::::::iffi---'-----------'-------- 10 5 

### ot· 

# 2011 and 2020 Projected Emissions Inventory Entire Nonattainment Area

Sector NOX NOX NOX 

### 2003 2011 2020 Area 2.54 2.66 2.80 Non-road 41.00 34.77 27.68 On -road 95.51 47.53 19.62

Point 99.71 78.93 75.95 Total 238.77 163.89
. 126.25 Sector VOC VOC VOC 

### 2003 2011 2020 Area 35.07 36.93 40.01**Non~road** 21.17 15.87 15.26 On -road 40.97 ·25.69 16.89

Point 35.90 38.30 38.81 Total 133.11 116.80 110.97

NOx Tons·Per Summer Day Entire Non atta in men tAre a

(Tons per Summer Day)
250 ,..---------------------------, 200 

### +-------------------- 150 

### +-------------------- 100 

### +----------

50 

### +-----------

o 

### -1-----"""""-..--.- A rea Nonroad Onroad Point Total 11B2003 [J2011 m2020 

# I

C-3VOt Tons per Sum m er Day Entire Nonattainm ent Area

(T 0 n s per Sum mer Day)

Nonroad 

### o nroad Point. Total la2003 02011 182020 

# I

C-4

# APPENDIXD Public Participation Documentation 

# Summary ofand Response to Comments Received Legend

• Comment
o IDEM's Response Jeff Kling, Duke Energy Indiana,' Gallagher Station

.• DUkeEnergy Indiana strongly supports the Clark and Floyd County ozone redesignation request. •

o No comment necessary.



### D-l

### D-2

### LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Revision to the Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan in association with the 8 hour ozone standard, for Clark and Floyd Counties. Notice is hereby given under40 CFR 51.102 that the Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management (IDEM) will hold a public hearing on Monday, November 6, 2006. Thepurpose ofthis hearing is to receive public comment on the Draft Revision to the Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan in association with the 8 hour ozone standard, for Clark and Floyd Counties. The meeting will convene at 6:00 p.m. (local time) at Clarksville Branch Library, 1312 Eastern Blvd., Clarksville, Indiana. All interested persons are invited and will be given opportunity to express their views concerning the draft documents. This revision to the Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan is.being drafted and submitted consistent with United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) guidance. Copies ofthe draft documents will be available on orbefore October 6, 2006 to any person upon request and at the following locations:

• Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management, Office ofAir Quality, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate, Room Nl003, Indianapolis, Indiana.

• Floyd County Public Library, 180 West Spring Street, New Albany, Indiana.

• Jeffersonville Township Public Library, 211 East Court Avenue, Jeffersonville, Indiana.

• Charlestown Public Library, 51 Clark Road, Charlestown, Indiana. Oral statements will be heard, but for the accuracy ofthe record, statements should be submitted in writing. Written statements maybe submitted to the attendant designated to receive written comments at the public hearing. IDEM will also accept written comments through November 10,2006. Mailed comments should be addressed to: Clark and Floyd County Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan Revision Kathryn Watson, Chief Air Programs Branch, Office ofAir Quality- Mail Code 61-50 100 North Senate Avenue Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management Indianapolis, IN 46206-2251 A transcript ofthe hearing and all written submissions provided at the public hearing shall be open to public inspection at IDEM and copies maybe made available to any person upon payment of reproduction costs. Any person heard orrepresented at the hearing orrequesting notice shall be given written notice ofactions resulting from the hearing.For additional infonnation contact 

### Mr. Gale Ferris, at the Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management, Office ofAir Quality, Room 1001, Indiana GovernmentCenterNorth, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis or call (317) 234-3653 or (800) 451-6027 ext. 3-0425 (in Indiana).
Kathryn Watson, Chief Air Programs Branch Office ofAir Quality



## ******************************************************************************** Individuals requiring reasonable accommodationsforparticipation in this hearingshouldcontact the IDEMAmericans with DisabilitiesAct(ADA) coordinatorat: Attn: ADA Coordinator Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management

- Mail Code 50-10 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 

### Or call (317) 233-1785 

### (voice) or (317) 232-6565 

### (TDD). Pleaseprovide a minimum of 72 

### hours notification.Joseph E Kernan Governor Lori F. Kaplan Commissioner 

### INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT We make Indiana a cleaner, healthierplace to live.
100 North Senate Avenue P.O. Box 6015 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015 (317) 232-8603 (800) 451-6027 www.IN.gov/idem 

### Indianapolis Star & 

### News 307 North Pennsylvania PO Box 145 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Phone: 3 17-444-4000 Fax: 317-444-8806 ATTENTION: 

### Date: October 2, 2006

PUBLIC NOTICES - LEGAL ADVERTISING SECTION 

### Enclosed, please find a Legal Notice ofPublic Hearing concerning a revision to the 8 Hour Ozone Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan for Clark and Floyd Counties. 

### Please print ONE TIME, on or before October 6, 2006, in order for us to satisfy our statutory requirements. Please send a notarized form no. 99p and/or publisher's claim, together with the clipping, showing the date ofpublication and your Federal ID number to: 

## MAIL TO: Attn: Sandra Robinson, Room NI001 Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management Air Programs Branch, Office ofAir Quality Mail Code 61-50 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-2251 Ifyou have any questions, please call me at**317-233~0427.** 

### Thank you. Sincerely, Sandra Robinson Air Programs Branch Office ofAir Quality Enclosures

RecycledPaper 

### (i) An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 

### 0Form Prescribed by State Board ofAccounts INDDEPT 

### OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT MARION COUNTY, INDIANA 81956-4546769 General Form No. 99 P (Rev. 1987) To: INDIANAPOLIS NEWSPAPERS 307 N PENNSYLVANIA ST

- PO BOX 145 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46206-0145 PUBLISHER'S CLAI RECEIVED STATE OF INDIANA LINE COUNT 0CT 1 2 2006 Display Matter

- (Must not exceed two actual lines. neither ofwhich

shall total more than four solid lines ofthe type in which the body ofthe advertisement is set). Number ofequivalent lines Head

- Number oflines Body

- Number oflines Tail

- Number oflines

Total number oflines in notice COMPUTATION OF CHARGES

119.0 lines -LQ columns wide equals 119.0 equivalent lines at .374 cents per line DEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALMANAGEMENT**OFFI~E** OFAIRQUALITY $._----'-- $._----'--**$--~- $---~** **$,--~-**

$ 4-,-,4"".5",,1

TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM DATA FOR COMPUTING COST

Additional charge for notices containing rule and figure work (50 per cent of above amount) Charges for extra proofs ofpublication ($1.00 for each proofin excess oftwo)

Width ofsingle column 7.83 ems Number ofinsertions -1Q Size oftype 5.7 point . ;"."**$--~-**

$-----'-- $-----'-- $

__---'-.0"-'0'--**$--~­** $

__......::!:44"'.5'-!.1 Pursuant to the provisions andpenalties ofChapter /55, Acts of /953, I hereby certify that the foregoing account isjust and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing alljust credits, and that no part ofthe same has been paid.

DATE: 10/06/06

81956-4546769 PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT State ofIndiana SS: MARION County Personally appeared before me, a notary public in and for said county and state, ",; the**undersi~ed S\a~ey**  McCullough who, being duly sworn. says that SHE is clerk ofthe INDIANAPOLIS NEWSPAPERS a DAILY STAR newspaper ofgeneral circulation printed and published in the Engl.i.sh language in the city ofINDIANAPOLIS in state and county aforesl!id, and that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, which was duly published in said paper for 1 time(s). between the dates of: 10/06/2006 and 10/06/2006

Subscribed and sworn to before me on 10/06/06

# S=~.K~ Notary Public

STATE PRESCRIBED FORMULA form tiS-REY 1-88 "OFFICIALSEAL" My commission expires:**+-_~~Ill_K€~hem-_f** NotaryPublic, State ofIndiana My Commission .05 II
7.83 PICA COLUMN

- 94 POINT 94 POINTS / 5.7 PT. TYPE c 16.49 16.49 EMS / 250

- .06596 SQUARES .06596 SQUARES x $5.14

- .339 CENTS PER LINE PUBLISHED 1 TIME

### =.339 PUBLISHED 2 TIMES= .509 PUBLISHED 3 TIMES= .679 PUBLISHED 4 TIMES= .848DATE: 10/06/06

# ~tff!MdJ»H: ' Title 

### 81956-4546769 

### PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT State ofIndiana SS: MARION County Personally appeared before me, a notary public in and for said county and state,

which was duly published in said paper for 1 time(s), between the dates of: and county aforesaid, and that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy. the undersigned Stacey McCullough who, being duly sworn, says that SHE is clerk

PUBLISHED 1 TIME = .339 PUBLISHED 2 TIMES= .509 PUBLISHED 3 TIMES= ,679 PUBLISHED 4 TIMES= ,848

# s:~~ Notary Public printed and published in the English language in the city ofINDIANAPOLIS in state

10/06/2006 and 10/06/2006

"OFFICIAL SEAL" My. commission expires:: 

### -S

__-'S.I..c;:nlS<"''''!t>
...**G-Jv~.ffi:~**':mt---fNotary Public, State ofIndiana My Commission**E~ O~/~~~ll**  ofthe INDIANAPOLIS NEWSPAPERS a DAILY STAR newspaper ofgeneral circulation

Subscribed and sworn to before,me on 10/06/06 LEGAL NO.TICE OF j PUBUC.HEARING ' Revision to, the RedesiglJation Petiti,on and Mai.ntenance Plan

In association with the 8 . i**'hourozoriestandard~** 

## I , fO.' Clark.'and,.FIO.yd counties., Notice, is hereby 9!Ven under 40 CFR 51.102 that the Indiana

o Department -of-**Environmen~al** Management (IDEM) will. hold a pubnc, hearing, on Mdnday, November 6,' 2006. ,The" pur- pQs,e of this hearing' is to re- ceive pubHc comment o.n the Draft 'ReviSiori to the Redesig- nation Petition a,nd
.. Mainl!'!,- nance Plan irl-'association with**~he** 8 hour ozone**st~ndar.d.** for**Oark~nd** Floyd C0l:lnties. The meeting will convene at.-q:OQ 

## Ip:m."(local f.,.me) at Clar.**~sv.iIJe** BrClnch Ubrary. 1312**~ast~rn** 

## IBlvd., Cia. rkSVil.le, ,Indiana

..AII interested persons are invited and wiH be giv,en opportunity !to e'xpress their views' con-
, cerning the**draftdoauments~** ,This revisionto the**Redesigria~** tlon, Petition and Maintenance,

, Plan is ti'eing' drafted and-'sub- rhitted" consistent 'with United States Environmental**Protec~** titin Agency (USEI:'A)**gUidanc~.** Copies of the draft documents will be available on or bef()re' ,October 6, 2006;to any'person 'upon**re_qu~st** and, at trae**fol~ towin9JQcations~:.**  '. ;**;o~~~~~:iD~:n~~:~~~t~~:** 1**~ri~er~m:~t c~~~~~tYNO~~itog**  I North Senat¢, Room N1003, i·Ihdlanapolis,Indiana. .:'.

. \**ia~I~~~os~;rhg~:~e~~bN~~** 1Albany's Ihdiana. ,',.**Fort'PUbl'~e~6~~~~~~\ E~gt~~.C~**  I**~venue,** Jeffersor:wiJIe, Indl-**~:n~·harlestown** Pu'blic library. SlClayk**.'Road~** Charlestown,**~nr~\?~t~·tements** will be heard, 'E PRESCRIBED FORMULA but fpr the accuracy of tlJe**record~** statements should**~e** submitted in writing., Written**staiem~hts** may be.submitted ICA COLUMN

- 94 POINT to the .attendant**deslgna~ed** to receive**.writte~ c~roments**  at INTS 15 7 PT TYPE

- 16 49 .the,publlc-heanng.,."

.. '. •• •



### ..**~~~~~~~~,?,,~~~e~~~:r:,t~~** EMS 1250 - .06596 SQUARES

1ll 2006, Maired 'CQlllments SQUARE $ CE
. shouldbea.ddressedto:

.. ' S X 5,14

- ,339 NTS PER LINE (:Wk**and,FI~~d** !:ounty Re.d.es-·

. ighation**-Pet'~lon** and.**Ma,l(lt~-** nance Pla,n,R,evisi9n'

# '\!:::~:a**~~part** ..rne ..

## nt:.

# ~~:~:: ronmental M'.lo.a9.ement Indianapolis,IN 46206-2251. A transcript-of the hearing and 'all written.**-submis~ions** pro- vided ;;It the public hearing shall be open**to,public.insp~c­** "tion at IDEM' and copies may "be made available to any per.,.. ;son upon· payment of repro,.. diJction costs.. Any person heard or,**repr~sented** at., the**~tiearing** or, requesting, notice shall**b~** given written notice of actions resulting from'**th~** ,hearing.

. '.Foradditional information**con~** taCt""'Mr. Gale Ferris, 'atthe In-**~iana Departm~At**  of environ- mental**Manage·m·ent~** Office of Air Quality, Room 1001, Indi- ana Government,Center North, 100 North' Senate Avenue, In- dicmapulis or call (317) 234- :3653 or (800) 451-6027 ext. 3, "0425 (in Indiana),

. . Kathryn Watson, Chief Air Programs Branch Olliceof AirQuality

. Individ,uals: .requiring reason- able accommodations for par- ticipation

. in this**he~ring** should , contact the IDEM Americans with', Disabilities Act (AQA) coordinator at:
. ; Attn: ADA Co'ordinator Indiana. Oepartment of Envi-

. ronmenta,! Management - Mail Code 50-10 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 49204-2251 Orcall (317) 233-1785 (voice)·

.or**~17)** 232-6565. (TOO), Please -provide a minimum of j 72 hours. notification. I (S 19/06

- 4546769)" 

### . 

## TO: ACCOUNTING IGCN
..,Room 1345 \

' 

## 'FROM: KAROLT. CHUMA IGCN -1001 

## RULES SECTION**OFFI~E** 

## OF AIR QUALITY DATE: 

# /O-It12-0b " Note: Please send a copy ofthe pajd publication to 

# --:::::r;. d"F1-nl4- D

## /.~ 

## Ai**<ItJ~~~r** ..·' 

## The attached invoice for publication of pu1?lic notice is approved for payment. ACCOUNT # 

## 3610/140900Joseph E. Kernan Governor Lori F. Kaplan Commissioner 

### INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT We makeIndiana a cleaner, healthierplace to live.
100 North Senate Avenue P.O. Box 6015 Indianapolis, Indiana46206-60 15 (317) 232-8603 (800) 451-6027 www.IN.gov/idem 

### Evening News 221 Spring Street Jeffersonville, Indiana 47130 Phone: 812-283-6636 Fax: 812-284-7080 Date: October 2, 2006

ATTENTION: PUBLIC NOTICES - LEGAL ADVERTISING SECTION 

### Enclosed, please find a Legal Notice ofPublic Hearing concerning a revision to the 8 Hour Ozone Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan for Clark and Floyd Counties. 

### Please print ONE TIME, on or before October 6, 2006, in order for us to satisfy our statutory requirements. Please send a notarized form no. 99p and/or publisher's claim, together with the clipping, showing the date ofpublication and your Federal ID number to: 

## MAIL TO: Attn: Sandra Robinson, Room NI001

. Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management

Air Programs Branch, Office ofAir Quality Mail Code 61-50 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-2251 Ifyou have any questions, please call me at 317-233-0427. Thank you. Sincerely, Sandra Robinson Air Programs Branch

. Office ofAir Quality

Enclosures

RecycledPaper 

# * An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 

### 011/15/2005 10:21 8122847080 THE EUENING NEWS

-- PAGE 02
The Evening NeWs 221 Spring St. P.O. Box 867 Jeffersonville, 47130 Genera}·Fonn No. 99p (Revised 1999)
. From: PUBLISHER'S CLAIM .by State Board ofAccounts

.INECOUNT Display tter (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither ofwhich shall total re than four solid lines oftype in which the body ofthe adverti lernent is set)

-- number ofequivalent lines
. -

__.,.--_---.:

_ Head

-- nu IJ1ber oflines

- - -**----ll-'/,.b.-l~tl_'Q::.L.-** - Body

-- N ber oflines

- , .;..'

_ Tail

-- ou er oflines .•...........................................•

__.,..-..,....._.,,-

_ Total Dum t' oflines in notice

__,-I**,.J:~"-LI.LI ~~**  _ I

:: FEDERALID#

55-0870768 )ATA FOR COMpUTING COST Width of

# S~gle column 9.0 ems . Number

## o~nsertions L Slze of

### typi~ 7 point
ursuant to the Jrovisions and penalties ofChapter 155, acts 1953, I herebylertify that the foregoing account isjust and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after Uowing 

### aUiustiils, and that no pitto(the ,...e h
.. 

### beenPaidf2,
. 

### I3li!u.1cr,;
... i

. :OMPUTATIO OF CHARGES 

### U lines, , columns wide equals equivalent lines at cents per line $**~3=:::...Lr;..!... -==3~():....-**  _ ldditional char for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 percen 'ofabove·amount) , , _ :harge for extr proofs ofpublication ($4.00 for each proof in excess :- two) '.'**_...,.-:".::~=-:-** _ 'OTALAMOU T OF CLAIM ........................•.................. ---"S:::.....L'Z..L.**_5~Dc!.-** 

### _ 

### I

.

'if

. .

. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 

### /;'1' day

### of/l..~,- 20d" PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT State ofIndiana ) ) ss: Clark County ) Personally appeared ,before m/} a**not~ublic** in and for ·said coun,ty· .... and state, the undersigned 

### !:Jlm**~C2JJO** who, being duly . : sworn, says that she is legal bookkeeper of1)le Evening News ne""spaper ofgeneral circulation printed and published in**theEngl~sh** language in the (city) ofJeffersonville instate and county'aforesaid,

.and that the printed matter attached hereto 

### is a true copy, which was duly published in said paper for ( time , the
. dates ofpublication being as follows:

### !J~4A...- 6,':;00 (p

.... , ....... Title: Legal Bookkee;per . , 20' 

### (jC· //-/ -j

)(oS 

## If9

## Lo.5l 11/15/2006 WED 9:19 [JOB NO. 5284] 1l!I00211/15/2006 10:21



### ! 

# i I 

# .i ! 

# , I I ! i ! 1 

# I I , i! I

# I , I

# I i ;

### ! ! I

# I I

# I i 

# I ! i , f 

### I ! i , ; 

### I 1 ; 1 

## I 

# I J 

# i 8122847080 THE EUENING NEWS -.

11/15/2006 WED 9: 19 PAGE 03

[JOB NO. 5284]**~003**

## TO: ACCOUNTING IGCN - Room 1345 FROM: KAROL T. CHUMA IGCN -1001 RULES SECTION OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

## DATE:I/--D'l- 0 

## fe Note: Please send a copy ofthe paid

_ publication to EVer;,'"

# 7

# :J./L«J!-
.. {u

# QA-Ied 1';.1 

# ::r ejfdl-fSrrnv,/I

## ~( 

# -rAJ The attached invoice for publication of public notice is approved for payment. ACCOUNT # 3610/140900Joseph E. Kernan Governor Lori F. Kaplan Commissioner 

### INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

### We make Indiana a cleaner, healthierplace to live.
100 North Senate Avenue P.O. Box 6015 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015 (317) 232-8603 (800) 451-6027 www.IN.gov/idem 

### New Albany Tribune PO Box 997 New Albany, Indiana 47150 Phone: 812-283-6636 Fax: 812-283-1150 

### ATTENTION: Date: October 2, 2006



### PUBLIC NOTICES - LEGAL ADVERTISING SECTION Enclosed, please find a Legal Notices ofPublic Hearing concerning a revision to the 8 Hour Ozone Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan for Clark and Floyd Counties
. .{ 

### Please print ONE TIME, on or before October 6, 2006, in order for us to satisfy our statutory requirements. 

## 1L/. &D

- Please send a notarized form no. 99p and/or publisher's claim, together with the clipping, showing the date ofpublication and your Federal ID number to: 

## MAIL TO: Attn: Sandra Robinson, Room NI001 Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management Air Programs Branch, Office ofAir Quality Mail Code 61-50 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-2251 Ifyou have any questions, please call me at 317-233-0427. Thank you. Sincerely, Sandra Robinson Air Programs Branch Office ofAir Quality Enclosures

RecycledPaper @ An Equal Opportunity Employer l 

### /{)O j(/.

Please Recycle 

### 0THE EUENING NEWS 11/15/2006 10:08 8122847080 j

## F~ by Stale Board of

## ACCOU~" To:... '.J,£),. 

## is)qp\ 

# lSb 

# en j

### UA~ PI d C <dQrve11l.meJ1tal Unit:)
.

oy**ounty~** n<11ana : PUBLISHER'S cLAIM

### ~. PAGE 02 General Ponn No. 99p (Revised 1999). From:
.THE TRIBUNE 221 Spring St. P.O. Box 867 Jeffel'Sonville, IN 47130 LINECO Display atter (Must not exceed two actual lines. neither ofwhich shall total ore than four solid lines oftype in which the body ofthe adve isementis set)

-- number ofequivalent lines ..............•..•... ---r--rr--:-"i"-,,;=O------ Head

-- lUmber oflines 

# l X 1/:5 Body

-- umber offmes

_ Tail

-- n mber oflines· • •.•.........................**--....--;...----"7':"~-~---** Total ou aber ofHnes in notice : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . I}( 

## II I COMPUTATI DN OF CHARGES 

## 11.d... lines,

_ columns wide equals

## l.l.d equivalent lines at· 

### 3'

## 3 cents per line ..•....................................$

...... S<...1...L..:..l**.3~b::..-** 

## _ Additional ch rge for notices conUliningrule or**tabul~** work (50 perc t otabove amount)L '.'
.. : ; , _

# Char1~**~~;:t~lr:~s. ~~** **~~~~~~~~ .(~~:~** **:~~ ~~~~** **~~~~ _="';;::;--=~-----_**  raTAL

## AM01~NT OF CLAIM 

### --"'"3:1 

### 3 

# 0<---

_ i DATA FOR CpMPUTING COST Width**o~singl~** column 9.0 ems Number**~'f** insertions 

### ....1- Size of**~pe** 7 point FEDERALID#

. 55-0870768

Pursuant to th(. provisions and penalties ofChapter 155, acts 1953, 1 herebiycertify tbat the foregoing account isjust and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after "lowing

### aU

## julrtcredit" ond that 00 port ofthe

## same has b= paid: 

# £J-ri<...

. .. ...

. Date:

__**~_~--LA..::.l?_'---L-f** 

### -, 20 

### tJC Title: Legal Bookkeeper

Subscribed

## and sworn to before me this

### 7~ day of

### D~ .6 20 dt. I PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT State ofIndiana ) ) ss: Floyd County ) Personally**ap~ared** before**no~lic** in and for said couno/ and state, the undersigned f1kZ.? .t:5£Ll,iJQ who, being**~uly** sworn, says that she is legal bookkeeper ofThe Tribune newspaper ofgeneral circulation published in the English language in the (city) ofNew Albany in state and county aforesaid, and that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, which was duly published in said paperfor 

## I time
. ; the
. dates ofpublication being as follows:

## t2~**~.** 

## tJ.M(o !

..11/15/2006 10:21



## ! 

# i i I 

# I I I I 1 ! 

# I I l I 

## i I 

### j 

# I I i ; 

### ! 

# I 

# I I

# I
I

# I

, 

## l I I 

### I I 1 I

# I 1 1 l I

# I
l

# I 8122847080 PAGE 03

, ...........**,~......** I'!' PIo 0 A 1

## TO: ACCOUNTING IGCN - Room 1345 FROM: KAROL T. CHUMA IGCN -1001 RULES SECTION OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY DATE: 

## //-O?-ofp

ACCOUNT # 

### 3610/140900

H:\Fotms-l\Legal Notice

- Payment Form.wpd

..Ft 1 

### INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT REDESIGNATION PETITION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN



## RECEIVEO---, STATE OF INDi{'

..i t , i 

# Ore

- Q 

### 20CI('

..... , 0
.. ) .It..") 

### DATE:
TIME: November 6, 2006
6:00 P.M. 

# r

I 

# I DEPA/'iTM"Nru I,"." """""",,"", L

__ _ _ __'._

.. i

_ ...**~,-_** ..**_~**


### PLACE:

PRESENT: Clarksville Branch Library 1312 Eastern Boulevard Jeffersonville, Indiana 47130 Scott Deloney and Gale Ferris, Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Audience Members: Jon Trout, Air Pollution Control

District, Louisville JoAnn M. Kaelin, Court Reporter.

### 5 Counties, Indiana. My name is Scott Deloney and I 4 the 8-hour ozone standard for Clark and Floyd 2 MR. DELONEY: This is a public IDEM 1 2 hearing concerning revisions to the redesignation 3 petition and maintenance plan in association with

6 represent the Indiana Department of Environmental 7 Management's office of air quality. I am here to 8 serve as hearing officer for this public hearing 9 this evening. 10 Notice of this hearing was published 11 In the following publications: The Indianapolis 12 Star located in Indianapolis, Indiana; the 13 Jeffersonville Evening News located in 14 Jeffersonville, Indiana; and the Clarksville Tribune 15 located in Clarksville, Indiana. 16 A transcript of this hearing is being 17 made. Anyone interested in recelvlng a copy of the 18 transcript or the final documents concerning this 19 matter may do so by notifying the Indiana Department 20 of Environmental Management. 21 The sign-up sheet lS located in the 22 back of the room for interested parties to be 23 recognized for their participation in this hearing. 24 For those of you interested in providing comment 25 this evening, appearance blanks are also located on

JoAnn M. Kaelin, Court Reporter 

### (812) 284-5289 Fax (812) 284-0075 jrnkaelin@insightbb.com

### 1 

## IDEM the sign-in table in the back of the room. Please 3



## 2 complete an appearance blank and return it to me to 3 ensure that the record accurately depicts your name 4 and affiliation. IDEM is also accepting written 5 comments concerning this matter through 4:00 P.M., 6 Eastern Standard Time, Friday, November 10th. You 7 can refer to the information located in the pUblic 8 notice, also located on the back table this evening. 9 At this time I would like to enter 10 the following documents into record: Overview and 11 background document concerning the Discontinuation 12 of the Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program in 13 Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana; a Section 110(1) 14 of the Clear Air Act Technical Support Document; and 15 the revised Request For Redesignation and 16 Maintenance Plan for Ozone Attainment in the Indiana 17 Portion of the Louisville Basic Ozone Nonattainment 18 Area. 19 (The referenced documents were marked 20 for identification collectively as Exhibit A, and 21 they are attached to the original transcript of this 22 hearing.) 23 MR. DELONEY: Finally, I would like 24 to provide a brief overview of the revisions to the 25 redesignation petition and maintenance plan and

JoAnn M. Kaelin, Court Reporter 

### (812) 284-5289 Fax (812) 284-0075 jrnkaelin@insightbb.com
.

### IDEM 1 share the results of the technical evaluation that 2 supports this revision. 3 IDEM recently submitted an 8-Hour 4 Ozone Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan 5 for Clark and Floyd Counties dated July, 2006, t6 6 the 

# u.s. EPA requesting that these Counties be 4



### 7 redesignated to attainment of the standard. Clark 8 and Floyd Counties, along with the remaining portion 9 of the Louisville nonattainment area, have attained 10 the National Ambient Air Quality standard for ozone. 11 Indiana has performed an analysis 12 that shows the air quality improvements are due to 13 permanent and enforceable measures and that 14 significant regional reductions of oxides of 15 nitrogen following implementation of Phase II of the 16 NOxSIP Call and the Clean Air Interstate Rule will 17 ensure continued compliance or maintenance with the 18 standard. 19 Indiana's petition includes a long20 term maintenance plan that will be implemented to 21 ensure that the area continues to meet the 8-hour 22 standard for ground-level ozone through the year 23 2020. Indiana also committed to maintain all 24 emission control measures necessary to maintain 25 continued compliance with the standard following

JoAnn M. Kaelin, Court Reporter 

### (812) 284-5289 Fax (812) 284-0075 jmkaelin@insightbb.com

### IDEM 1 redesignation. 2 The vehicle inspection and 3 maintenance program was first initiated in 1984 in 4 accordance with the Clean Air Act. This program was 5 augmented in 1997 to a fully enhanced vehicle 6 inspection and maintenance program and was 7 incorporated within Indiana's I-hour ozone State 8 Implementation Plan in 1996. Although the U.S. EPA 9 revoked the I-hour ozone standard on June 15th, 10 2005, Clark and Floyd Counties were designated 11 nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone standard 12 effective June 15th, 2004. Therefore, the program 13 is required to be in place until all applicable 14 Clean Air Act requirements are met. 15 The vehicle inspection and 16 maintenance program is authorized by state statute, 17 IC 13-17-5, paid for by the state general fund and 18 implemented through rules promulgated by the Air 19 Pollution Control Board at 326 lAC 13-1.1. The 20 program tests approximately 7 percent of the 21 registered automobiles in the Greater Louisville 22 Basic Ozone Nonattainment Area and costs the State 23 of Indiana approximately one million dollars per 24 year to operate and maintain. The program yields 25 less than a one percent reduction in total oxides of

JoAnn M. Kaelin, Court Reporter (812) 284-5289 Fax (812) 284-0075 jmkaelin@insightbb.com 

### 5

### IDEM 1 

### nitrogen and volatile organic compound emissions for 2 the nonattainment area. 3 On July 1, 

### 2003, an amendment to 4 IC 13-17-5 became effective that terminates 5 Indiana's vehicle inspection and maintenance rule 6 for Clark and Floyd Counties after December 31st, 7 2006, and directs the Air Pollution Control Board to 6



### 8 

### amend 326 lAC 13-1.1 to reflect this**change~** 

### IDEM 9 is in the process of amending the state rule to 10 accommodate the discontinuation of the vehicle 11 inspection and maintenance program in Clark and 12 Floyd Counties. IDEM has also revised the 8-hour 13 Redesignation Petition and Maintenance Plan for 14 Clark and Floyd Counties in order to move the 15 vehicle inspection and maintenance program from 16 Section 6.2, where it was listed as a measure to 17 remain in place over the course of the maintenance 18 plan, to 'Section 8.0, where it is listed as a 19 contingency measure. 20 IDEM has also revised Section 6.0 to 21 clarify that Indiana in the mid-1990s promulgated 22 rules specific to Clark and Floyd Counties that 23 require RACT (Reasonably Available Control 24 Technology) for new and existing sources of volatile 25 organic compounds locating in these counties.

JoAnn M. Kaelin, Court Reporter 

### (812) 284-5289 Fax (812) 284-0075 jmkaelin@insightbb.com

### 1 

### IDEM In order to support the revision to 7

2 the 8-hour Redesignation**P~tition** 

### and Maintenance 3 Plan for Clark and Floyd Counties, IDEM has prepared 4 a demonstration that meets the requirements of 5 Section 110(1) of the Clean Air Act, hereinafter 6 referred to as the Section 110(1) demonstration. 7 This demonstration is supported by photochemical 8 modeling and an emissions analysis. Photochemical 9 modeling shows that NOx 

### emissions will increase by 10 .78 tons per summer day and .82 tons per winter day 11 with a discontinuation of the vehicle inspection and 12 maintenance program. Volatile organic compound 13 emissions will also increase by .79 tons per summer 14 day and 1.49 tons per winter day. 15 Despite this fact, 2007 total 16 emissions are projected to be less than the total 17 2002 emission levels, which is the base year for the 18 PM 2.5 standard, 2003 total emissions, the base year 19 for the ozone maintenance plan, and 2009 total 20 emissions, which is the deadline for monitoring 21 attainment under the new PM 2.5 standard. 22 The 2010 and 2020 total emission 23 levels referenced In the ozone maintenance plan are 24 also projected to be less than the total 2003 25 emission levels. Therefore, the discontinuation of

JoAnn M. Kaelin, Court Reporter (812) 284-5289 Fax (812) 284-0075 jmkaelin@insightbb.com

### IDEM 1 the vehicle emlSSlons testing program will not 2 interfere with attainment of the 8-hour ozone 3 standard in Clark and Floyd Counties or elsewhere 4 within the nonattainment area. 8



### 5 Furthermore, this demonstration shows 6 that the discontinuation of the vehicle emissions 7 testing program will not interfere with the area's 8 reasonable progress**tow~rds** 

### attainment of the 9 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for fine 10 particles or PM 2.5. 11 This concludes my remarks concernlng 12 this matter. This hearing is now open for public 13 comment. Any public comment? I have not received 14 any appearance blanks. 15 (No response.) 16 

### MR. DELONEY: And ln the absence of 17 further comment, this public hearing is hereby 18 closed. 19 (Conclusion of hearing.) 20 21 22 STATE OF INDIANA ) ) 

### COUNTY OF CLARK ) SS : 23 I, JOANN M. 

### KAELIN, Court Reporter 24 and Notary Public in and for the State of Indiana, 25 whose commission as such expires March 5, 2007, do

JoAnn M. Kaelin, Court Reporter 

### (812) 284-5289 Fax (812) 284-0075 jmkaelin@insightbb.com

### IDEM 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true, correct 2 and complete transcript of the public hearing taken 3 at the time and place and for the purpose set out 4 herein; that the appearances were as set out in the 5 caption hereof; that the said public hearing was 6 taken down by me in stenotypy and afterwards 7 transcribed into**compu~er-assisted** 

### transcription by 8 me. 

## 9 I further certify that I am not 10 attorney or counsel for any of the parties in the 11 matter about which this public hearing took place, 12 or related to or employed by any of the attorneys or 13 counsel involved, and further, that I am not a 14 relative or employee of any of the parties involved 15 and that I am not financially interested in the 16 matter. 17 GIVEN under my hand as Notary 18 aforesaid, this the 27th day of November, 2006. 9



### 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Seal) M. 

### KAELIN Reporter and Notary Public of Indiana

JoAnn M. Kaelin, Court Reporter (812) 284-5289 Fax (812) 284-0075 jmkaelin@insightbb.com