alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dean L. Cash, Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of ATEL
Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2007       
|                             
|/s/ Dean L. Cash             
|Dean L. Cash                 
|President and Chief Executive
|Officer of General Partner   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 340/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.340.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 340 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5322 December 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.340.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 340

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5322 December 2010

---

| Contents | | IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 789/08/COL of 17 December 2008 amending College Decision No 195/04/COL on the implementing provisions referred to under Article 27 in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice as regards the standard forms for notification of aid | 1 |

Contents

IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty

page

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 789/08/COL of 17 December 2008 amending College Decision No 195/04/COL on the implementing provisions referred to under Article 27 in Part II of Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice as regards the standard forms for notification of aid

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H24]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            RECALL DESIGNEE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                              The Speaker's Rooms,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                  Washington, DC, January 6, 2009.
     Hon. Lorraine C. Miller,
     Clerk of the House of Representatives,
     The Capitol, Washington, DC.
       Dear Madam Clerk: Pursuant to House Concurrent Resolution 
     1, and also for purposes of such concurrent resolutions of 
     the current Congress as may contemplate my designation of 
     Members to act in similar circumstances, I hereby designate 
     Representative Steny Hoyer of Maryland to act jointly with 
     the Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, in the 
     event of my death or inability, to notify the Members of the 
     House and the Senate, respectively, of any reassembly under 
     any such concurrent resolution. In the event of the death or 
     inability of that designee, the alternate Members of the 
     House listed in the letter bearing this date that I have 
     placed with the Clerk are designated, in turn, for the same 
     purposes.
           Sincerely,
                                                     Nancy Pelosi,
     Speaker.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 10.1







EXHIBIT 10.1




October 12, 2010




William Farber


RR 1 Box 1281


Carbondale, PA. 18407



Dear Bill



In anticipation of the closing (the “Closing Date”) of the contemplated merger of Comm Bancorp, Inc. (“CBI”) with and
into F.N.B. Corporation (“FNB”), the parties hereto agree to the following terms and conditions:




	 	1)	 	This agreement is acknowledged by FNB and William F. Farber, Sr., to be a supplemental agreement and not
an agreement to be substituted for the Executive Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2010 entered into between
CBI and William F. Farber, Sr.






	 	2)	 	The severance payments to be paid to Mr. Farber as recited in his employment agreement with CBI is to be
paid to him on the 1st day of the 7th month after his employment is terminated. Upon the
1st day of the 7th month following his termination of employment, Mr. Farber is to
receive the accumulated 6 month payments together with interest as determined under the applicable section(s)
of the Internal Revenue Code.






	 	3)	 	With regard to whatever payments are paid to Mr. Farber under the terms of this Supplemental Agreement
and the initial Executive Employment Agreement referenced herein William F. Farber, Sr., agrees and
acknowledges that his taxes imposed with respect to change of control and severance payments and/or severance
benefits shall be Mr. Farber’s responsibility alone.






	 	4)	 	The severance payments and/or benefits which is referenced in the Executive Employment Agreement as past
retirement payments and/or benefits William F. Farber, Sr., is to receive under the terms of that Agreement
and this Supplemental Agreement is conditioned upon his remaining employed by FNB through the period of the closing of
the merger of CBI with and into FNB and continuing through that period upon which FNB converts CBI’s core
processing system to FNB’s system.



 


1









 






William F. Farber, Sr.


Page 2


October 12, 2010



In the event William F. Farber, Sr., fails to comply with what is expected of him to remain employed with FNB
during the critical time periods referenced hereinabove then FNB shall have no obligation to pay Mr. Farber
any severance or change of control payment(s) unless FNB terminates Mr. Farber before or during the time
periods recited and referenced above.




/s/ William F. Farber, Sr.        

 William F. Farber, Sr.



Date:10/12/10                          



 


2
## OSHRC e-FOIA Reading Room

Comments on Proposed Rulemaking, 29 C.F.R. part 2200

Open Commission Meeting, August 30, 2012, Building a Legacy: Innovative and Effective Case Resolution at the Commission Level

In accordance with the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996, Pub. L. 104-231, 110 Stat. 3048 (codified as amended in 5 U.S.C. 552) (e-FOIA), we provide the following records, which were created on or after November 1, 1996, electronically over the internet:

(1) Final decisions including concurring and dissenting opinions as well as orders issued as a result of adjudication of cases;

(2) OSHRC Rules of Procedure and Guides to those procedures -- Guide to Review Commission Procedures, Employee Guide to Review Commission Procedures and Guide to Simplified Proceedings; and

(3) A general index of and copies of (a) records that have been released under the FOIA that, because of the subject matter, the Commission determines have become or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records; (b) records that have been released to a person under the FOIA and have been requested three or more times; and (c) records that the Commission determines, absent a FOIA request, could be of significant public interest:

Secretary of Labor v. A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc.

Secretary of Labor v. Kiewit Power Constructors Co.

Secretary of Labor v. SeaWorld of Florida, LLC

Secretary of Labor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Secretary of Labor v. Summit Contractors Inc.

Secretary of Labor v. Imperial Sugar Co., Imperial-Savannah, L.P.

Secretary of Labor v. Southern Pan Services Co.

Secretary of Labor v. AKM LLC d/b/a Volks Construction

Secretary of Labor v. Integra Health Management, Inc.

Secretary of Labor v. Schaad Detective Agency, Inc.

OSHRC welcomes feedback on how we can improve our e-Reading Room. Please contact the FOIA Service Requester Center with any suggestions. Thank you.

Last Updated: January 4, 2019
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 21

                    ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    State or
                                                                     Other
                                                                  Jurisdiction
        Subsidiary                                              of Incorporation
        ----------                                              ----------------
        <S>                                                     <C>
        Alberto-Culver (Australia) Pty. Ltd....................       Australia
        Alberto-Culver Canada, Inc.............................          Canada
        Alberto-Culver Company (U.K.), Limited.................  United Kingdom
        Alberto-Culver International, Inc......................        Delaware
        Alberto-Culver de Mexico, S.A. de C.V..................          Mexico
        Alberto-Culver (P.R.), Inc.............................        Delaware
        Alberto-Culver USA, Inc................................        Delaware
        Beauty Systems Group, Inc..............................        Delaware
        Beauty Systems Group (Canada), Inc.....................          Canada
        BDM Grange, Ltd........................................     New Zealand
        Cederroth International AB.............................          Sweden
        CIFCO, Inc.............................................        Delaware
        Indola Cosmetics, B.V.................................. The Netherlands
        IHB SpA................................................           Italy
        La Farmaco Argentina I. y C.S.A........................       Argentina
        Pro-Line International, Inc............................        Delaware
        Sally Beauty Company, Inc..............................        Delaware
        Soraya, S.A. 3/4.......................................          Poland
        St. Ives Laboratories, Inc.............................        Delaware
</TABLE>

Subsidiaries of the company omitted from the above table, considered in the
aggregate, would not be considered significant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          27,615
<SECURITIES>                                     3,148
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,056
<PP&E>                                          12,794
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,961
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,710
<SALES>                                         93,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,396
<CGS>                                           52,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,056
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,647
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,178
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,469
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,469
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Property Analysts Master
Limited Partnership ("NPAMLP") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Edward B. Lipkin, President of EBL&S, Inc., the Managing
General Partner of NPAMLP certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NPAMLP.

                           NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           (Registrant)

                           Date: May 17, 2006
                                 ------------

                           By: EBL&S, Inc., its managing general partner
                               -----------------------------------------

                           By: /s/ Edward B. Lipkin
                               --------------------
                               Name:  Edward B. Lipkin
                               Title: President
October 15, 2015

Christopher La Berge

11442 Bristle Oaks Terrace

Austin, TX 78750

Dear Mr. Christopher La Berge:

This is in response to your April 9, 2015, letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2015-0960)

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). You requested to conduct aerial videography and 

photography using an unmanned aerial system.

The information you submitted did not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81. On 

July 7, 2015, the FAA sent you a letter stating that we were unable to process your request 

without further information. Specifically, we asked you to provide the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

On September 2, 2015, the FAA received additional information. The FAA has reviewed the 

information and finds that you did not provide the sections from which you seek relief, why 

granting the request would be in the public interest, and the reasons why the exemption 

would not adversely affect safety.
2

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your 

exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit 

your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director, Office of Rulemaking
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30887

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TIMMY COBBINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-1657-I (89-295)

- - - - - - - - - -

December 23 1996

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Timmy Cobbins, federal inmate #21216-034, appeals the denial

of this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Cobbins argues that because the

superseding indictment charged him and his

codefendants/conspirators with using “and” carrying firearms

during and in relation to a drug conspiracy and because “and” and

“or” both mean “and,” the Government was obligated to prove both

“use” and “carry” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and the Government

did not prove active employment of the firearm, i.e. “use,” as
No. 96-30887

- 2 -

defined by Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). He

also argues that the jury instructions covering § 924(c)

erroneously defined “use” under the statute as defined by Bailey

and that in light of the remand in United States v.Fike, 82 F.3d

1315, 1328 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 241 (1996),

Cobbins’ case should receive the same result. 

We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate

record. For essentially the same reasons as explained by the

district court in its order denying § 2255 relief, we conclude

that the district court did not err in denying Cobbins’ motion. 

See United States v. Cobbins, No. 96-1657 (89-295) (E.D. La. July

31, 1996).

To the extent that Cobbins requires a certificate of

appealability (COA) in order to appeal the district court’s

judgment, we conclude that Cobbins has not made a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). 

AFFIRMED. COA DENIED.
EXHIBIT 10.20





Narrative Summary of American Consumers, Inc.


Named Executive Officer Base Salaries for Fiscal 2011





The following table sets forth the base salary established for the fiscal year ending in May 2011 for the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”), the only currently serving executive officer of the Company who qualifies as a “named executive officer” pursuant to Item 402(m)(2) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K.  The annual base salary for the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Michael A. Richardson, was set at $88,400 at the time of his death on November 20, 2009.  The Board of Directors of the Company, acting upon the recommendations of management and the Board’s Compensation Committee, has elected to leave the base salary for the current Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer unchanged from his base salary at the end of the Company’s 2010 fiscal year.








Name:
Title:
Annual Base Salary:Paul R. Cook
Chairman of the Board, President

and Chief Executive Officer, and

Chief Financial Officer
$72,800
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21








                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<PAGE>   2

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21



                SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC.




     The subsidiaries of the Company as of March 14, 1997, all of which are
wholly-owned, are set forth below:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          NAME                            STATE OF INCORPORATION
          ----                            ----------------------

<S>                                              <C>
BookCrafters USA, Inc.                           Michigan
Curtis 1000 Inc.                                 Georgia
Discount Labels, Inc.                            Indiana
International Envelope Company                   Delaware
Jen-Coat, Inc.                                   Massachusetts
Vanier Graphics Corporation                      California
</TABLE>



     The results of operations of all subsidiaries described above are included
in the Consolidated Financial Statements
#### Crane Marks Company *v.*Gordon, Appellant.

April 15, 1907:

*Appeals*— Paper-books—-Evidence—Quashing *appeal.*

Where the assignments of error depend for their correct determination upon a consideration of the evidence rule XXIV will be strictly enforced.

Where a considerable part of the oral evidence as taken by the official reporter is not printed, a certificate of the appellant’s counsel that the part printed is all of the evidence pertinent to the questions raised by the assignments of error, cannot take the place of the certificate of the judge required by rule VI, and prevent enforcement of the rules where it is insisted on by appellee’s counsel.

Argued March 1, 1907.

Appeal, No. 52, Jan. T., 1907, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Jan. T., 1905, No. 453, on verdict for plaintiff in case of The Crane Marks Company v. A. A. Gordon.

Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Orlady, Head and Beaver, JJ.

Appeal quashed.

Motion to quash appeal.

*Thomas P. Puffy,*for appellant.

*R. J. Murray,*for appellee, filed no printed brief.

Per Curiam,

The assignments of error in this case depend for their correct determination upon a consideration of the evidence; there is reason, therefore, for strict enforcement of rule XXIV : *316Bradley v. Vernon, 166 Pa. 603; Pittenger v. Kennedy, 148 Pa. 198. Where a considerable part of the oral evidence as taken by the official reporter is not printed, a certificate of the appellant’s counsel that the part printed is all of the evidence pertinent to the questions raised by the assignments of error, cannot take the place of the certificate of the judge required by rule VI, and prevent enforcement of the rules where it is insisted on by appellee’s counsel.

The appellee’s motion is allowed, the appeal is non prossed and the record remitted to the court below.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10842]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 
leadership time is reserved.

                          ____________________
```
#### Dexter Lake Trailer Park, Inc. v. Badger

(14701).

Affirmed. Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 25.10 and Rule 25.15. (602 P2d 352))