alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MORGANTON,

SEPTEMBER TERM, 1793.

#### Hayle *v.*Cowan.

Petition to rectify error in a patent, heard by the Court without Use intm vi-nfiou of a jury j and the error was ordered to be rectifier1 agreeably to the act of Assembly. This was in the case of a royal patent, and Hayle had summoned four witnesses, the dispute being only whether the first line described in the certificate annexed, was really north 54 degrees east, or south 54 degrees east. *Mr. Avery*then moved, that as two of these witnesses had not been sworn at all, and as there could he but one fact to be established, that the Defendant should not be subject to the payment of these two witnesses : but *per curiam,*you informed us a while ago, you had a witness summoned who does not attend; these two witnesses not sworn, might be intended to counteract his testimony, and your not producing him might be the reason why they were not called upon; we cannot undertake to say they were to prove the same fact the other two were sworn to — the motion denied *per*Judges Ashe and Macay.

Note. — Vide *Carpenter*v. Taylor, N. C. *Term Rep.*265.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael Coppins, state and attest that:



|1. | I am the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Main Place Funding, LLC (the Registrant).
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



the Quarterly Report on 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
periodic report) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant for the periods presented.



|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael Coppins                                                         
|                                                                            
|Michael Coppins Principal Financial and Accounting Officer November 14, 2003



36
#### Loveland and another, Appellants, vs. Loyd, Respondent.

*October 11*

November *5, 1929.*

*117For the appellants the cause was submitted on the brief of *Z. S. Rice*of Sparta.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Abel & Goodman*of Sparta, and oral argument by *L. J. Goodman.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

The sole question presented by the assignment^ of error in this case is, Was the evidence offered to contradict the terms of the contract properly received by the trial court ? Upon the trial the defendant admitted that the bond forwarded to him was in accordance with the terms of the written contract. The contract provided that the bond should “protect me in the conditions of this contract.” If the bond was that the plaintiffs would perform the conditions of the contract on the plaintiffs’ part to be performed, then it fully protected the defendant in the conditions of the contract. The language used is not that customarily employed. It is considered, however, that it could mean nothing else *118than that the bond was to be conditioned upon the full performance by the plaintiffs of the terms of the contract. The evidence offered on behalf of the defendant and received by the court tends directly to contradict the terms of this written instrument. This under well established principles the defendant could not do. There is no allegation of fraud, no attempt to have the contract set aside, reformed, or modified, and the plaintiffs were clearly entitled to judgment upon the record. *Ohio Elec. Co. v. Wisconsin-Minnesota L. & P. Co.*161 Wis. 632, 155 N. W. 112.

*By the Court.*— Judgment appealed from is reversed, and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment for the plaintiffs in accordance with the prayer of the complaint.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 89543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26213]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 76

[MB Docket No. 23-203; Report No. 3220; FR ID 260366]

Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petition for Reconsideration; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission corrects Dates for the 
filing of replies to oppositions to the Petition for Reconsideration, 
published in the Federal Register of November 1, 2024, announcing the 
dates for filing oppositions and replies to the Petition for 
Reconsideration of Action. The document contained an error in the Dates 
section.

DATES: November 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, please 
contact Joseph Price, Policy Division, Media Bureau, at 202-418-1423 or 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 1, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-25497, 
on page 87322, in the third column, correct the Dates caption to 
read:DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must be filed on or before 
November 18, 2024. Replies to oppositions to the Petition must be filed 
on or before November 29, 2024.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-26213 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
Working Safely 

in Trenches

When done safely, trenching 

operations can reduce worker 

exposure to cave-ins, falling loads, 

hazardous atmospheres, and 

hazards from mobile equipment. 

OSHA standards require that 

trenches and protective systems 

be inspected daily and as conditions 

change by a competent person before work begins. 

Never enter a trench unless:

• It has been properly inspected by a competent person.

• Cave-in protection measures are in place. 

• There is a safe way to enter and exit. 

• Equipment and materials are away from the edge.

• It is free of standing water and atmospheric hazards. 

Prevent trench collapses:

• Trenches 5 feet deep or greater require a 

protective system.

• Trenches 20 feet deep or greater require a protective 

system designed by a registered professional engineer. 

Protective systems for trenches:

• SLOPE or bench trench walls by cutting back the trench 

wall at an angle inclined away from the excavation. 

• SHORE trench walls by installing aluminum hydraulic 

or other types of supports to prevent soil movement.

• SHIELD trench walls by using trench boxes or other 

types of supports to prevent soil cave-ins.

QUICK CARDTM OSHA 3243-09R 2018

For more information:

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)

SHORE IT

SLOPE IT

SHIELD IT

800-321-OSHA (6742)
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant, 

v. OSHRC Docket No. 10-1057 

OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE 

The parties are requested to brief all issues presented in the Respondent’s Petition for 

Discretionary Review. In particular, the parties are asked to address the following issues: 

Did the judge err in finding that the cited fall protection standard, 29 C.F.R. 

§ 1926.502(d)(15), was applicable to the cited condition and/or that employees 

were exposed to the alleged hazard? 

If not, did the judge err in finding non-compliance with the cited standard? 

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of 

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: June 27, 2011	 /s/ 

Ray H. Darling, Jr. 

Executive Secretary 

2
# C_2017071EN.01000201.xml

| 7.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8352 — KKR/KSL/Apple Leisure Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 71/03)

On 1 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8352. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8352. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 and 70 

[EPA-R07-OAR-2009-0913 ; FRL ] 

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans ; State of 

Nebraska 

AGENCY : Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . 

ACTION : Proposed rule . 

SUMMARY : EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) and Operating Permits Program to 

revise the state definition of volatile organic compounds ; 

clarify language and incorporate rules related to construction 

permits to incorporate application fees and include a mechanism 

to use construction permits to accomplish other permitting 

needs ; and clarify language related to open fires and explicitly 

include an exemption for fires used for religious activities . 

Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency between the 

state and Federally-approved rules . 

DATES : Comments on this proposed action must be received in 

writing by [insert date 30 days from the date of publication in 

the Federal Register] . 

ADDRESSES : Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No . 

EPA-R07-OAR-2009-0913, by mail to Chrissy Wolfersberger, 

Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101 . 
2 

Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand 

delivery/courier by following the detailed instructions in the 

ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule located in the rules 

section of this Feder al Register . 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Chrissy Wolfersberger at 913- 

551-7864 or by e-mail at Wolfersberger .chris@epa .gov . 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : In the final rules section of the 

Federal Register , EPA is approving revisions to .the state's SIP 

and Operating Permits Program as a direct final rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 

noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant 

adverse comments to this action . A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final rule . If no relevant 

adverse comments are received in response to this action, no 

further activity is contemplated in relation to this action . 

EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule 

will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed 

if 

action . EPA will not institute a second comment period on this 

action . Any parties interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time . Please note that if EPA receives 

adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final 
3 

those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse 

comment . For additional information, see the direct final rule 

which is located in the rules section of this Federal Register . 

Dated : 2/ Z O/0 

Julv 21 . 2010 illiam Rice, 

Acting Regional Administrator, 

Region 7 .
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of
ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | June 1, 2007
|----- | ------------



|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                  
|Paritosh K. Choksi Executive Vice President of General Partner,Principal Financial Officer of Registrant

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Page 24 of 24
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on December 31, 2014

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 07-1796

Pullman Power, 

LLC, and its 

successors

09/24/08 DFR Chairman Rogers

2 08-1292

Wal-Mart 

Distribution Center 

#6016

01/12/10 DFR 01/25/10 Closed

3 09-1048 Brand Energy 

Solutions LLC 09/02/10 DFR 09/07/10 Closed

4 08-1656

Central Florida 

Equipment 

Rentals, Inc.

09/08/10 DFR 10/22/10 Closed

5 09-1013 Wal-Mart Stores, 

Inc. 04/06/11 DFR 04/19/11 Closed

6 08-1386 Delek Refining, 

Ltd. 06/08/11 DFR 06/14/11;05/29/12 Closed

7 10-2659

Jacobs Field 

Services North 

America

10/27/11 DFR 11/22/11 Closed

8 09-1901 Seward Ship’s 

Drydock, Inc. 11/14/11 DFR 11/21/11, 04/17/13 Closed

9 09-1184 Dana Container, 

Inc. 03/28/12 DFR 04/25/12 Closed

10 11-0146 Lake Erie 

Construction Co. 05/18/12 DFR 05/24/12 Closed

11 10-1372 Briones Utility Co. 08/20/12 DFR 09/05/12 Closed

12 08-1774 Angelica Textile 

Services, Inc. 09/28/12 DFR 10/16/12 Closed

13 10-2313

Charles W. 

Mason, DDS & 

Associates, PLLC

10/22/12 DFR 11/15/12 Closed

14 11-2395 Kiewit Power 

Constructors Co. 01/24/13 DFR 03/04/13 Closed

15 12-0643 K.M. Davis 

Contracting, Inc. 01/25/13 DFR 01/30/13 Closed

16 10-2096

United Contractors 

Midwest, Inc. d/b/a 

R.A. Cullinan & 

Son

03/20/13 DFR 03/29/13 Closed

17 09-2011

Cranesville

Aggregate 

Companies, d/b/a 

Scotia Bag Plant

04/25/13 DFR 04/26/13 Closed

18 09-2055

Cranesville 

Aggregate 

Companies, d/b/a 

Scotia Bag Plant

04/25/13 DFR 04/26/13 Closed
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on December 31, 2014

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

19 12-1045

S.J. Louis 

Construction of 

Texas

04/25/13 DFR 04/25/13 Closed

20 11-2780 Peacock 

Engineering, Inc. 05/22/13 DFR 05/30/13 Closed

21 12-1496 Action Electric 

Company 06/14/13 DFR 06/18/13 Closed

22 11-1734 Calpine 

Corporation 06/24/13 DFR 06/26/13 Closed

23 11-2556 The Davey Tree 

Expert Company 07/31/13 DFR 08/22/13 Closed

24 10-0637

BP Products North 

America, Inc., & 

BP-Husky 

Refining, LLC

09/16/13 DFR 11/01/13 Closed

25 11-2559 Jim Boyd 

Construction, Inc. 01/22/14 DFR 01/31/14 Closed

26 12-1324 The Davey Tree 

Expert Company 02/06/14 DFR 02/28/14 Closed

27 12-1600 Envision Waste 

Services 02/10/14 DFR 02/24/1404/16/14 Closed

28 13-1034

Empire Roofing 

Company 

Southeast, LLC

04/11/14 DFR 05/05/14 Closed

29 12-2142

Meadows 

Construction 

Company, LLC

06/05/14 DFR 06/24/14 Closed

30 12-2385 Evergreen 

Construction Co. 08/11/14 DFR 10/24/14 Open

31 12-1617 Houston 

Aquarium, Inc. 09/18/14 DFR 10/20/14 Open

32 13-1022

Mid South 

Waffles, Inc., d/b/a 

Waffle House 

#1283

12/31/14 DFR

*DFR – Direction for Review

REM – Appellate Remand

INT REV - Interlocutory Review
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2321]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     TRIBUTE TO MRS. GLORIA COOPER

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. FRED UPTON

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, November 20, 2008

  Mr. UPTON. Madam Speaker, I rise today to recognize Mrs. Gloria 
Cooper of Niles, Michigan for over two decades of broadcasting 
excellence.
  For nearly a quarter century, we in southwest Michigan welcomed 
Gloria into our homes as the hostess of the popular ``Here's Gloria'' 
and ``Gloria's Place'' radio programs on WNIL-AM 1290. Since she first 
hit the airwaves in 1966, Gloria's in-depth interviews and community 
focus through the years earned her the reputation as the ``Voice of 
Niles.''
  In 2006, Gloria took her show to the Web where she has continued to 
educate and entertain her faithful listeners. On November 24, Gloria 
will record her final interview, marking the end of an era. We will all 
miss Gloria's voice over the airwaves and Internet. She is a treasure 
of our community, and I will miss being ``grilled'' by my friend on the 
pressing issues of the day.
  Once again, I would like to congratulate and express my gratitude to 
Gloria Cooper for her many years of distinguished service to the 
residents of Berrien County. I wish Gloria and her husband Richard all 
the best. May God continue to bless the entire Cooper family. Gloria's 
gift of communication has enriched us all.

                          ____________________
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-01-1994
<CASH>                                         22,827
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         840,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (118,682)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 766,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        246,614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    115,750
<COMMON>                                       347
<OTHER-SE>                                     299,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   766,083
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               35,667
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (240)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,423)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.28)


</TABLE>