From: Mohan Nagavedu [mnagavedu@aqmd.gov]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:07 PM
To: Adams, Lucy H.
Cc: Mulrine.Phil@epamail.epa.gov Subject: FW: More data for EPA on Chrome NESHAP Attachments: ATOTECH USA INC Fumitrol 140 MSDS.doc; PES DisMist NP at Gene's Plating.pdf Lucy / Phil,
I will be emailing you the Chrome data you had requested in several emails. We have a 5 MB limit at a time. Also see Cheryl’s email below for this particular attachment. Please call me if you have a problem with the attachments. Mohan Nagavedu Supervising Air Quality Inspector 909

‐396

‐3739 909

‐396

‐3342 fax MNagavedu@AQMD.Gov

From: Cheryl Marshall
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:22 AM
To: Mohan Nagavedu
Cc: Eugene Kang Subject: More data for EPA on Chrome NESHAP Mohan, Attached are the PES Source Test for Gene’s Plating (DisMist NP) and 2 MSDS for Fumitrol 140 that EPA asked for. I believe this completes what was requested of our group with the exception of the Data for Table B

‐6 and B

‐7 which we were unable to locate and Chris Abe, who did the calculations, has since left the District. Cheryl

### ATOTECH USA INC -- FUMETROL 140 MIST SUPPRESSANT -- 6810-00F053502 ===================== Product Identification ===================== Product ID:FUMETROL 140 MIST SUPPRESSANT MSDS Date:02/11/1992 FSC:6810 NIIN:00F053502 MSDS Number: CDRPD === Responsible Party === Company Name:ATOTECH USA INC Address:1750 OVERVIEW DR Box:12000 City:ROCK HILL State:SC ZIP:29731-2000 Country:US Info Phone Num:803-817-3500 Emergency Phone Num:803-817-3500 CAGE:ATOTC === Contractor Identification === Company Name:ATOTECH USA INC Address:1750 OVERVIEW DR Box:12000 City:ROCK HILL State:SC ZIP:29731-2000 Country:US Phone:803-817-3500 CAGE:0RP46 Company Name:ATOTECH USA INC Address:1000 HARVARD AVE Box:12000 City:CLEVELAND State:OH ZIP:44109-5000 Country:US Phone:800-752-8464 CAGE:ATOTC ============= Composition/Information on Ingredients ============= Ingred Name:ORGANIC FLUOROSULFONATE Fraction by Wt: 1-7% OSHA PEL:2.5 MG/CUM ACGIH TLV:2.5 MG/CUM ===================== Hazards Identification ===================== Routes of Entry: Inhalation:YES Skin:NO Ingestion:NO Reports of Carcinogenicity:NTP:NO IARC:NO OSHA:NO Health Hazards Acute and Chronic:EYES/SKIN: MAY CAUSE IRRITATION. INHALATION: FUMES/VAPORS FROM A HEATED SOLUTION MAY CAUSE RESPIRATORY TRACT IRRITATION. Explanation of Carcinogenicity:NONE Effects of Overexposure:IRRITATION.======================= First Aid Measures ======================= First Aid:EYES: IMMEDIATELY FLUSH W/FLOWING WATER FOR 15 MINS. SKIN: WASH EXPOSED AREAS THOROUGHLY W/SOAP & FLOWING WATER. INHALATION: REMOVE TO FRESH AIR. GIVE CPR/OXYGEN IF NEEDED. INGESTION: NEVER GIVE FLUID S/INDUCE VOMITING IF UNCONSCIOUS/HAVINGCONVULSIONS. IF CONSCIOUS/NONCONVULSIVE, INDUCE VOMITING & GIVE 1-2 GLASSES OF WATER/MILK. OBTAIN MEDICAL ATTENTION IN ALL CASES. ===================== Fire Fighting Measures ===================== Extinguishing Media:WATER SPRAY, FOAM, CO2, DRY CHEMICAL. Fire Fighting Procedures:WEAR A SCBA & PERSONAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING. Unusual Fire/Explosion Hazard:IRRITATING FUMES/VAPORS MAY DEVELOP IF PRODUCT IS EXPOSED TO ELEVATED TEMPS/OPEN FLAME. ================== Accidental Release Measures ================== Spill Release Procedures:WEAR RESPIRATOR & PROTECTIVE CLOTHING. SAFELY STOP LEAK. REMOVE IGNITION SOURCES. DIKE AREA. LARGE: COVER LIQUID POOLS W/FOAM TO CONTROL VAPORS. PUMP LIQUID INTO SALVAGE TANK & RETAIN FOR EVALUATION & /DISPOSAL. (SEE SUPP) ====================== Handling and Storage ====================== Handling and Storage Precautions:NORMAL WAREHOUSE HANDLING & STORAGE IN A COOL, DRY AREA. Other Precautions:MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO AQUATIC LIFE IF RELEASED TO OPEN WATERS. DON'T WEAR CONTACT LENSES. AVOID CONTACT W/EYES, SKIN & CLOTHING. DON'T BREATHE FUMES/INHALE VAPORS/MISTS FROM SOLUTION. ============= Exposure Controls/Personal Protection ============= Respiratory Protection:WEAR A NIOSH/MSHA APPROVED ORGANIC VAPOR RESPIRATOR W/DUST & MIST PREFILTER IF VENTILATION IS INADEQUATE. Ventilation:LOCAL EXHAUST: RECOMMENDED. MECHANICAL (GENERAL): REQUIRED. Protective Gloves:POLYVINYL CHLORIDE Eye Protection:CHEMICAL GOGGLES Other Protective Equipment:PROTECTIVE CLOTHING, EYEWASH & EMERGENCY SHOWER. Work Hygienic Practices:REMOVE/LAUNDER CONTAMINATED CLOTHING BEFORE REUSE. WASH THOROUGHLY AFTER HANDLING. Supplemental Safety and Health SPILLS: SMALL: COVER W/SAND, CLAY/OTHER NONCOMBUSTIBLE ABSORBENT. USE NON-SPARKING TOOLS TO TRANSFER ABSORBED MATERIAL TO SUITABLE CONTAINER FOR DISPOSAL. CAREFULLY FLUSH AREA W/LARGE VOLUMES OF WATE R. RETAIN WATER-RESIDUE MIXTURE FOR EVALUATION &/DISPOSAL. ================== Physical/Chemical Properties ================== Melt/Freeze Pt:M.P/F.P Text:27-32F Spec Gravity:1.025 Solubility in Water:MISCIBLE Appearance and Odor:WHITE/PALE YELLOW, SLIGHTLY CLOUDY LIQUID. ================= Stability and Reactivity Data =================Stability Indicator/Materials to Avoid:YES Stability Condition to Avoid:ELEVATED TEMPS, OPEN FLAME & OTHER IGNITION SOURCES. Hazardous Decomposition Products:SULFUR OXIDES & HYDROGEN FLUORIDE. ==================== Disposal Considerations ==================== Waste Disposal Methods:DISPOSE OF IAW/FEDERAL, STATE & LOCAL REGULATIONS. DISCHARGE TO PUBLIC SEWERAGE AUTHORITY SHOULD COINCIDE W/ALL APLLICABLE LOCAL PERMITS & NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. Disclaimer (provided with this information by the compiling agencies): This information is formulated for use by elements of the Department of Defense. The United States of America in no manner whatsoever, expressly or implied, warrants this information to be accurate and disclaims all liability for its use. Any person utilizing this document should seek competent professional advice to verify and assume responsibility for the suitability of this information to their particular situation.

# Material Safety Data Sheet

SECTION I - Material Identity SECTION II - Manufacturer's Information SECTION III - Physical/Chemical Characteristics SECTION IV - Fire and Explosion Hazard Data SECTION V - Reactivity Data SECTION VI - Health Hazard Data SECTION VII - Precautions for Safe Handling and Use SECTION VIII - Control Measures SECTION IX - Label Data SECTION X - Transportation Data SECTION XI - Site Specific/Reporting Information SECTION XII - Ingredients/Identity Information

SECTION I - Material Identity

Item Name Part Number/Trade Name FUMETROL (R) 140 MIST SUPPRESSANT National Stock Number 6850L4162322027 CAGE Code 08514 Part Number Indicator A MSDS Number 192022 HAZ Code B



### SECTION II - Manufacturer's Information

Manufacturer Name ATOTECH USA INCStreet 1750 OVERVIEW DRIVE City ROCK HILL State SC Country US Zip Code 29730 Emergency Phone 800-424-9300 Information Phone 803-817-3500 

### MSDS Preparer's Information

Date MSDS Prepared/Revised 16JUN98 Active Indicator Y


### Alternate Vendors

SECTION III - Physical/Chemical Characteristics

Appearance/Odor SLIGHTLY CLOUDY WHITE TO PALE YELLOW LIQUID. SLIGHT ODOR Boiling Point N/A Vapor Pressure N/A Vapor Density N/A Specific Gravity 1.025 Evaporation Rate N/A Solubility in Water SOLUBLE Percent Volatiles by Volume N/A Chemical pH 4-7 Container Pressure Code 1 Temperature Code 4 Product State Code L

### SECTION IV - Fire and Explosion Hazard Data

Flash Point Method NA Lower Explosion Limit NA Upper Explosion Limit NA Extinguishing Media WATER, DRY CHEMICAL, CARBON DIOXIDE, FOAM Special Fire Fighting Procedures DO NOT GET MATERIAL ON SKIN OR CLOTHING. AVOID INHALATION OF FUMES OR MISTS. STAY UPWIND, OUT OF LOW AREAS, AND VENTILATE CLOSED SPACES BEFORE ENTERING. COOL CONTAINERS FROM THE SIDE WITH WATER UNTIL FIRE IS OUT. USE WATER SPRAY TO REDUCE VAPOR. DO NOT PUT WATER DIRECTLY ON LEAK OR SPILL AREA. KEEP COMBUSTIBLES AWAY FROM SPILLED MATERIAL. SCBA AND CHEMICAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING CAN BE WORN BUT MAY NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE THERMAL PROTECTION FOR CHEMICAL FIRE UNLESS STATED BY THE MANUFACTURER Unusual Fire/Explosion Hazards DURING FIRE CONDITIONS, PRODUCT MAY EVOLVE IRRITATING AND TOXIC FUMES



### SECTION V - Reactivity Data

Stability YES Stability Conditions to Avoid NA Materials to Avoid STRONG OXIDIZERS Hazardous Decomposition Products THERMAL DECOMPOSITION MAY RESULT IN THE EVOLUTION OF CORROSIVE & TOXICFUMES OF HYDROFLUORIC ACID & AMMONIA Hazardous Polymerization NO Polymerization Conditions to Avoid WILL NOT OCCUR



### SECTION VI - HealthHazard Data

Route of Entry: Skin YES Route of Entry: Ingestion YES Route of Entry: Inhalation YES Health Hazards - Acute and Chronic [EYE] IRRITATION TO THE EYES AND SURROUNDING AREAS CHARACTERIZED BY REDNESS, SWELLING, TEARING AND PAIN. [SKIN] IRRITATION TO THE SKIN CHARACTERIZED BY REDNESS, SWELLING, AND PAIN. [INHAL] IRRITATION TO THE RESPIRATORY PASSAGES, INCLUDING THE NOSE, AIRWAY AND LUNGS CHARACTERIZED BY SORE THROAT, CHEST PAIN, COUGH, DIZZINESS, HEADACHE, ANUSEA, AND SHORTNESS OF BREATH. [INGEST] IRRITATION TO THE MOUTH, THROAT, AND STOMACH CHARACTERIZED BY SORE THROAT, ABDOMINAL PAIN, HEADACHE, NAUSEA, VOMITING Carcinogenity: NTP NO Carcinogenity: IARC NO Carcinogenity: OSHA NO Explanation of Carcinogenity NR Symptoms of Overexposure SEE ABOVE Emergency/First Aid Procedures [EYE] IMMEDIATELY FLUSH EYES WITH PLENTY OF WATER FOR AT LEAST 15 MIN. LIFT LIDS. GET MED ATTEN IFIRRITATION PERSISTS. [SKIN] WASH EXPOSED AREAS THOROUGH WITH SOAP AND WATER WHILE REMOVING CONTAMINATED CLOTHING AND SHOES. LAUNDER BEFORE REUSE. GET MED ATTEN IF IRRITATION PERSISTS. [INHAL] REMOVE TO FRESH AIR. GIVE ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION OR OXYGEN AS NEEDED. GET IMMEDIATE MED ATTEN. [INGEST] DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING. GIVE MILK OR WATER. CALL A PHYSICIAN OR POISON CONTROL CENTER IMMEDIATELY. NEVER GIVE ANYTHING BY MOUTH TO AN UNCONSCIOUS PERSON



### SECTION VII - Precautions for Safe Handling and Use

Steps if Material Released/Spilled WEAR NIOSH/MSHA APPROVED RESPIRATORY PROTECTION AND APPROPRIATE PPE. DO NOT GET SPILLED MATERIAL ON SKIN OR CLOTHING. STOP LEAK IF YOU CAN DO SO WITHOUT RISK. IF NECESSARY, DIKE AREA OF SPILL TO PREVENT SPREADING. COVERWITH SAND, CLAY OR OTHER NONCOMBUSTIBLE ABSORBENT MATERIAL. TRANSFER ABSORBED MATERIAL TO AN APPROPRIATE AND PROPERLY LABELED CONTAINER FOR DISPOSAL Neutralizing Agent NR Waste Disposal Method DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIAL FROM THE USE OF THIS PRODUCT MAY BE SUBJECT TO FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS Handling and Storage Precautions DO NOT GET IN EYES, ON SKIN, OR ON CLOTHING. DO NOT BREATH DUST, MIST ORVAPOR. DO NOT TAKE INTERNALLY. USE ONLY WITH ADEQUATE VENTILATION. WASH THOROUGHLY AFTER HANDLING. EMPTIED CONTAINER RETAINS VAPOR AND PRODUCT RESIDUE. OBSERVE ALL LABEL SAFEGUARDS. KEEP CONTAINER LIGHTLY CLOSED IN UPRIGHT PSTN Other Precautions NR



### SECTION VIII - Control Measures

Respiratory Protection USE NIOSH APPROVED RESPIRATOR WHEN TLV ARE EXCEEDED Ventilation LOCAL EXHAUST OR AN ENCLOSED HANDLING SYSTEM IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED. MECHANICAL/GENERAL VENTILATION IS REQUIRED Protective Gloves CHEMICAL RESISTANT Eye Protection CHEMICAL SPLASH GOGGLES AND FACE SHIELD Other Protective Equipment SAFETY SHOWER, EYEWASH STATION Work Hygenic Practices WASH SKIN THOROUGHLY AFTER HANDLING



### SECTION IX - Label Data

Protect Eye YES Protect Skin YES Protect Respiratory YES Chronic Indicator UNKNOWN Contact Code UNKNOWN Fire Code UNKNOWNHealth Code UNKNOWN React Code UNKNOWN



### SECTION X - Transportation Data

SECTION XI - Site Specific/Reporting Information

Volatile Organic Compounds (P/G) .4 Volatile Organic Compounds (G/L) 47.9355



### SECTION XII - Ingredients/Identity Information

Ingredient # 01 Ingredient Name NO INGREDIENTS LISTED ON MANUF. MSDS CAS Number 1005 Proprietary NO
Percent 0TEST RESULTS FOR FUME: SUPPRESSANT 

### CERTIFICATION MCGEAN ROHCO'S DIS MIST NP IN DECORATIVE CHROME PLATING TANKS

Prepared For: South Coast Air Quality Management District 9150 Flair Drive

Prepared By: Pacific Environmental Services Inc. 150 East Foothill Blvd. Arcadia, CA. 91006 (815) 357-1993 

# - March 16, 1990, . 

### TABLE OF CONTENTS



# .................................. Executive Summary 

### -1



# ....................................... Introduction 

### 2



# .................. Equipment and Process Description 

### 4



# ............................... Testing Methodology 

### 6



# ................. Quality Assurance/Quality Control.. 

### 9 Results of Source Tests,- 

# .......................... 11 Process Data Sheets

# .......................... Ap~endix Field Data Sheets

# ............................ Appendix Sample Recovery Sheets. 

# ...................... Appendix Calculation Sheets 

# .......................... Appendix Lab 2esults

# ..,............................... Appendix Chain of Custody Sheets

# ...................... Appendix



# ........................... Calibration Sheets Appendix

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

### EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



### SCAQMD Rule 1169, adopted June 3, 

### 1988 and amended September 8, 1989, requires all decorative chrome plating operations in the District to demonstrate emission reductions of 95% or stack emission rates below 0.15 mg/amp-hour as of November 

### 1, 1989. Further reductions are required in 1990 and 1992 for facilities with substantial emi ssions. The Metal Finishing Association of Southern California (MFASC) has offered to provide data on the efficiency of fume suppressants for preventing 'emissions of chromic acid mists. SCAQMD has indicated that data from such tests would be accepted 

### if the tests are conducted in accordance with SCAQMD requirements. The extent of the - 

### emission reduction in terms of a percentage of uncontrolled tank emissions must be clearly demonstrated for each anti-mist additive by multiple tests on full scale plating tanks. Once the additive is certified by the SCAQMD, the emission reductions will 

### be acknowledged 

### if the additive is used in accordance with the manufacturer's directions. This report provides source test data and results on the efficiency of McGean Rohco, Inc.'s, anti-,mist additive, Dis Mist NP, in controlling chromic acid emissions from decorative chrome plating tanks. After 6 

### days of testing a decorative chrome plating tank under uncontrolled and control1 ed conditions, it 

### was found that the average efficiency of Dis Mist NP 

### in controlling chromic acid emissions was 99.73% for total chrome and 99.84% for hexavalent chrome.

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

### 1

### INTRODUCTION

Pacific Environmental Services (PES), a participant in CARB's Independent Contractor Program, was contracted by McGean Rohco, Inc., to perform source testing to determine the efficiency of McGean Rohco's Dis Mist NP, 

### in reducing chromic acid emissions from decorative chrome plating tanks. Two tests per day were conducted for a three day period on uncontrolled emissions from a decorative chrome plating tank, and two tests per day were conducted for a three day period on the emissions from the--same plating tank with Dis Mist NP 

### added to the plating solution. Test dates were February 20 

# - February 22, 1990 for the uncontrolled tests and February 27 

## - March 1, 

### 1990 for the tests with Dis Mist NP. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the anti-mist additive Dis Mist NP, it 

### was necessary to have a host decorative chrome plating tank outfitted with an emission collection system. Facilities were - 

### made available by Mr. 

### Harry W. 

### Levy, President of Gene's Plating blorks, 3498 E. 14th Street, Los Angeles, %A. Earnest McClellan, Plant Manager, provided assistance with tank operation during source testing. The sampling location for the tests was in the 12,.75" 

### I.D. tank exhaust duct for Tank #42, before the emissions passed through any air pollution control equipment. The sample location and tank diagram are shown in Figure 1. 

### Source tests were conducted by M.J. Simon and S.G. 

### Parks of PES, under the direction of M.D. 

### High, Vice President of PES. Sam Oguntulu of SCAQMD was present during most days of testing to observe test conditions. Gary Wannlund and Ed Ong of McGean Rohco, Inc. were present during the testing to make additions of Dis Mist NP to the decorative chrome plating solution and to measure the surface tension of the plating bath.

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

### 2EQUIPMENT 

### AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION

Gene's Plating Works, 3498 

### E. 14th Street, Los Angeles, CA.. 90023 is engaged in the bus,iness of decorative chrome plating. Tests of chromic acid emissions were performed on decorative chrome plating Tank #42. The dimension-s of Tank #42 were 5'L x 3'W x 4'D. Before the tests were initiated, a smoke tube was used to check the collec-t-ion efficiency of the Tank #42 emission collection system. No fugitive emissions were observed. Two-tests each were conducted using applied amperages of approximately 800, 1300, and 2300 for both uncontrolled and controlled conditions (a total of twelve tests). Voltage was 6.0 

# - 7.0 volts D.C.. It was supplied by a smaller rectifier for the low and medium load conditions and by a larger rectifier for - the high load condition. Amp-hours were recorded from the amp-hour m'eter for the low and medium loads for use in subsequent calculations. During the high load test the larger rectifier could not be hooked up properly to the amp-hour meter so the amp-hours were calculated by the number of wheels used, the amperage used during plating, and the average time of plating. In order to obtain repeatable current consumption, identical loads were plated during the controlled and uncontrolled tests. For the low load tests, one wheel was plated at a time for a duration of 60-70 seconds. A total of 45 wheels were plated for each low test. During the medium load test an additional dummy wheel was placed in the tank and plated along with the 45 wheels. For the high load test two additional dummy wheels were placed in the tank and plated along with the 45 wheels. During testing, tank temperature was mai ntained at 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Freeboard height was myintained at 8.5" for all tests. The chromic acid concentration was measured at 23.0 ozlgal.

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 4

### For suppressa The manuf suppressa reduced s 74.8 dyne the nt m actu nt i 

### urfa slsa controlled emission te anufacturer provided t 

### rer's representative, n quantities sufficien ce tension in the plat uare centimeter. A re sts, the fume he fume suppressant. Ed Ong, installed t 

### to maintain a 

### ing solution below cord of chemical additibns and surface tension measurements is included in the Appendix as part of the test data. Surface tension results at the beginning and end of each test are shown below: Test L o a d
DMRlO Low L.oad DMRll Low Load Surface Tension dyneslsquare centimeter

- 

### DMR13

. 

### Medium Load 70.2-74.8 DMRl4 Medium Load 70.2-73.2 DMR16 High Load 71.7-74.8 DMR17 High Load 71.7-74.8

Dis Mist NP 

### is a liquid fume suppressant used to reduce drag-out losses and chromic acid mist generated during the course of decorative chromium plating. Dis Mist NP 

### reduces the solution surface tension, thus reducing the spray and mist which would either. be thrown into the atmosphere, or drawn up into the exhaust hoods. The reduced surface tension also allows better drainage of racks and parts.

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

### 5

### TESTING METHODOLOGY

PES 

### used the proposed test method of CARB 

### Method 425, dated July 7th, 1989, for sampling the chrome emissions. Sampling locations, velocities, volumetric flow rate, and moi sture content determinations were done in accordance with CARB 

### Methods 1, 

### 2, and 4. As specifi.ed by CARB 

### Method 1, 

### 12 sampling points were used. The sample was extracted through a glass nozzle, a nonheated 20" glass-line3 stainless steel probe, a 10 

### foot teflon hose from the probe 

### to the first impinger, 

### two Greenburg-Smith impingers each with 100 ml of 0.1N sodium hydroxide solution, an empty impinger, a glass filter holder, an impinger filled with silica gel, a 25 

### foot umbilical line, a vacuum pump, a dry gas meter, and a calibrated orifice connected 

### to an inclined manometer (Figure 2). Teflon coated glass fiber filters with 0.3, 0.1, and 0.035 micron pore, layers were used in the filter holders. The length of each test was 120 minutes. Sample sizes ranged from 97 

### to 120 cubic feet depending 

### on the nozzle size used and the measured stack gas velocities. Field data were recorded 

### on field data sheets during each test (Appendix). Leak checks were performed before and after each test. The volume of the impinger solution and the weight of the silica gel was recorded before and after the tests in order 

### to obtain the moisture content of the stack gas stream. The contents of the impingers were placed in 

### 500 ml. polyethylene containers and 

### the sampling train from the impingers 

### to the nozzle was rinsed 3 

### times with a 0.1 N 

### sodium hydroxide solution and added 

### to the same containers. Filters were placed in other polyethylene bottles and analyzed separately. The samples were kept at 60 degrees Fahrenheit or less during and after the tests prior 

### to the analyses in ,order 

### 'to prevent deterioration of hexavalent chrome 

### to

total chrome.

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

### 6-



### 1. 

### Glass or stainless steel sampling nozzle 2. Stainless steel probe sheath 3. 

### Stainless steel, glass, or Teflon-1 ined probe 4. Type 

### S pitot tube and manometer for 

### AP readings 5. Stack temperature sensor 

### 6. 15 

### ft. teflon probe line with ball and socket connectors
8. 

### Greenburg-Smith impinger with 100 ml. of .1 

### N 

### NaOH

Filter holder with teflon-lined glass fiber filter 1. 

### Modi fied Greenburg-Smi th impinger fi1 

### led with 200 grams of si 1 ica gel 2* 

### Impinger case filled with ice 3. 

### Impinger exit gas temperature sensor 4. 

### Umbilical line to meter box By-pass valve to adjust AH 8. 

### Leak free vacuum pump 9* 

### Dry gas meter

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC 

### FIGURE2
n:.--.- nc r.--i:,- T-,:,

### Laboratory analyses were conducted by 

### Thermo Analytical Laboratory in Clonrovia, California. Analyses for total chrome used atomic absorp'ti

### on spectrophotometry and analyses for hexavalent chrome used diphenylcarbazide colorometric techniques. The detection level of the analytical procedure for hexavalent chrome, Cr 6, and 

### total chrome, Cr T, were 0.003 

### and 0.001 

### mg/l respectively. Total chrome is easier to 

### measure and 

### detection levels can be reduced 

### to lower levels than those possible for hexavalent chrome. Total 

### chrome analyses serve as 

### a back-up and qua1 ity 

### control check for hexavalent chrome concentrations.

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

### 8

### QUALITY ASSURANCEIQUALITY CONTROL

A1 1 sampli ng devices were constructed and calibrated as specified in EPA reference Methods 

### 2 and 5 of 40 CFR 60, APTD-0576, and APTD-0581. The meter box was not moved from the site during the test series. It 

### was calibrated before and after the tests to make sure that the gas meter correction factor remained within tolerance during the tests. To ensure that the sampling trains were clean for each day of testing, all glassware and probe lines were cleaned with 0.1 normal nitric acid solution, 0.1 normal sodium hydroxide solution, distilled water, and acetone. The sampling trains were then capped until the next tests. To demonstrate that the sampl 

### ing trains remained free from contamination, a field train blank was run for each. day of testing. An extra sampling train was taken to- the site each day. and placed near the actual sampling train. The sample from the field train blank was retrieved along with samples from the trains used for the tests. Results showed that the amount of hexavalent chrome in the trains wa.s below detectable amounts and that the average amount of total chrome was below 0.010 mg/li ter for the liquid -sample and below 2.9 micrograms for filter samples (Table 

### 1). - 

### Trai.n blank results were used ,to correct the values for the test resul-ts. Extra Fare was used during sample retrieval. Clean rubber stoppers were used to cap the trains. Each sampling train was rinsed three times with 0.1 normal sodium hydroxide solution after the each test and these rinses were added to the respective sample. Disposable rubber gloves were worn during sample retrieval to help eliminate contamination. A1 1 sample volumes and weights were recorded immediately on sample recovery sheets during charging and sample recovery. -

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

### FIELD TRAIN BLANK RESULTS



### .............................................

TEST I)IQU ID LIQUID FILTER FILTER. DATE Cr6 

### CrT 

### Cr6 CrT

.......................................................................



### Average 

### r 0.003 rng/lJ 0.010 mg/l

. (0.5 

### ug. 2.9 

### ug

The value 

### of 0,0015 rrrg/l 

### was used for 

### purposes of 

### .correctingtest values.RESULTS OF SOURCE TESTS

Calculations were made from the field data sheets to determine sample volume, moisture content, molecular weight, velocities, and flow rates of the exhaust gas stream. Results are shown on the emission test calculation sheets (Appendix).
LOW LOAD Tests DMR-1 & DMR-2, conducted on the uncontrolled -- tank with an average amperage of 328 showed an emissions rate of 5.68 mglamp-hour for total chrome and 4.28 mglamp-hour .for hexavalent chrome (Table 2A and 2B). - Tests DMR-10 & DMR-11, conducted with Dis Mist NP and with an average amperage of 371, showed an emissions rate of 0.021 mglamp-hour for total chrome and 0.010 mg/amp-hour for hexavalent chrome (Table 5A and 5B). From these results the reduction benefit of Dis Mist NP for decorative plating conditions with nominal amperages of 800 was calculated. Results showed a reduction of 99.63% for total chrome and 99.77% respectively for hexavalent chrome (Table 8).

MEDIUM LOAD Tests AMT-4 & AMT-5, conducted on the uncontrolled tank with an average amperage of 453 showed an emissions rate of 4.75 mglamp-hour for total chrome and 4.00 mglamp-hour for hexavalent chrome (Table 3A and 38). Tests DMR-13 & DMR-14, conducted with.Dis Mist NP and with an average amperage of 451, showed an emissions rate of 0.00 mglamp-hour for total chrome (after correcting for the blank) and 0.003 mglamp-hour for hexavalent chrome (Table 6A and 6B).

I ! PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 11From these results the reduction benefit of Dis Mist NP, for decorative plating conditions with nominal

. amperages of 1300 A was calculated. Results showed a reduction of 100.0% total chrome and 99.93% respectively for hexavalent chrome (Table 8).
HIGH LOAD Tests DMR-7 & DMR-0, conducted on the uncontrolled tank with an average amperage of 919 showed an emissions rate of 2.55 mg/amp-hour for total chrome and 2.44 mg/amp-hour for hexavalent chrome (Table 4A and 48). Tests DMR-16 & DMR-17, conducted with Dis Mist NP and with an average amperage of 994, showed an emissions rate of 0.011 mg/amp-hour for total chrome and 0.004 mg/amp-hour for hexavalent chrome (Table 7A and 78). From these res-ults the reduction benefit of Dis Mist NP for decorative plating conditions with nominal amperages of 2300 A was calculated. Results showed a reduction of 99.57% for total chrome and 99.84% for hexavalent chrome (Table 8).
SUMMARY When Dis Mist NP was used in the decorative chrome plating solution in quantities to keep the surface tension between 63.0 and 74.8 dynes/square centimeter, hexavalent chrome emissions were reduced by an average of 99.84% for plating loads between 800 and 2300 amperes.

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

# 1 1203 C'J Y,

I J 1 0 I w-2- l 2 -1 IIE U I ITW m 1 QCU I mw- I r I

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTACSERVICES, INC. 

### 13C I C x I 

# - lr I 0 cr1 U WI rS. .* 9 1 L I 0 3 ca ' WI. A I I _I I 0 I lr I C ,:=. Z I I c;. O I w Z I 1 x I 

# - I '2. 

# - ZIU- rn a I .-.. C 

### - I .3 01 m.3
L I T'.,CCE 13 1 ."OU lr I I'.JZZZ 

# - !

L L aJCIBC CP '3 nn .A E E .3 L .4 L-

. U nu La. U,

f .L' L2 U .- 

## .- .3 

### .- .3 -3 01- 01'- L AX Y w-CIA iT .L u rz .u 0 0 LCLC CL TJ .- 13

. ,. 

# - - 13 I IC

iiL x >Tz + U u L.6'1 I.." ' C

I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

### 14C C .4 LU 

### .* nn 

# - nu LPL UYY

razz. .- 

## _.

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. I'.p Ln"aI LIT 1 13. ,..3 1 C'.,

. I a I c'.,

J I 0 I u=r- I 2 -1 LUU I ZWUI I <CU I rnw- I I '=L 

# -
IS- 

## -. "3 C 

# - 'U u, .4 r'4CCE -.or~u 87.4 

### = z 

### =

LIT 

## z,

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. i 

### 16LY L-4 0 Ln CTI U1 + la, ..- m d .A>

LU '+ w '+ L i: +l Ill 42 LLI fT 2

I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.I - t ..., ,

, .- .. . ... :.

. .. -..:. I..'.I.' '.

. ...

L

8. v..

... . . . !::.:;

. .. , $..

ENVIRONMENTAL 

### 2 1 I PACIFIC SERVICES. INC.WI. wu- 1 CllCT ml 4E I WW b 1 w12m I 

### =.=- I a .rT I I

ffl ffl

L L WCWC ET

# .. CT '4 C C .rl L ... L nwnw EU CSU .d

# - .rl A .d -3 w- LY- L L Y w4 w L- AEUEU 0 0 LCLC 

# - 0- 0 rD .;z. .c. 

### .-, 0

U3 

# -
3 ,3

u-, CT U-J WWNW nn-~ EEL== 1.0 ID 111 .n cn rn cn cn

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.I D. 1 t3 In1 0- UY I u-l r., I 8: 4 I I

2 _I -_I LL. LLT ALL-z. w I I+- I I+ r-- I-- 0 ra 4, '3 La .- I +- *z I-c r~ I I I I II lX I- E IS + !.+ _.. x zz rlrJ E x rn C1 P LU .XI DRW + C

I I \, PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

### 23I -1. M



# - I I.. I TI - I I I

I LI-, I r.7 .3 1 ,=. I .c, r5 1 $3 

### .=. I 0



## . I 0 ] 03

1 i 0 I W>- 1 1 -1 aCT U I XZW Ln 1 CCCD I mw- 1 sz I I

b-l IJJ .=. C. *i

1 I I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. 

### 24i ' I .- I...

m 4 In U3 d'd' I Ecl m Lo1 Ec

md' 4 m mm

### The field tests were conducted by M. 

### J. 

### Simon and S.G. 

### parks. Study direction and report preparation were under the supervisfon of M. 

### Dean Hfgh, Vice President of 

### Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.

pprove: 

# 3nt-iv

I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

### 26

### APPENDIX

### Plant: prsl 

# < 

# PhdIk Works 

## Date : 3-30

## -tin Source/Sampl

## e Number: 

# flA.Ak! 

# - 

# %

2, 

## Volume 

## Hater Vapor Colleoted, Standard Conditions Vlo 

# = 

# - 13.3 condensate from 

## irnpingers and Silica Gel Yu(at4) 

# = ,04707 

## Vro 

# = 

# o

. 

## .' 

# 6% aaf

3, 

## Percent Moisture, by 

## volume

4. 

## ~olecular 

## W~ighf,Stack gas Dry 

## Molecular 

## Night
Md 

# = 0. 

### 440 (% 

### COa) 

# + 0,320 (X 

## 02) 

# + 0.280. (X,Na 

## + % 

## CO)

## Pl ant: Date: 

## Source/Saapl e Number: 

# _ f-d

5, 

## Stack .Gas

.. ' 

## Velocity Average

6 , 

## Stack Yolumetric Flow 

## Rate, Aotual Conditions (Stack 

## Temperature and 

## Pressure) I



### 7. 

## Stack vo1uinetri.o flow rate, standard oonditioae (680 8, 

### 29.92. Hgl

8. 

## 'Isokinetia Variation! i. 1. I:. SAMPLE RD20VERY DATA. Plant: 

## Gc-evs P\q*; 4 \ L~)*\<S
4 Date: 2-20 

### --q0 Sampling Location: 

### TA~Y 

### 47 Scq3s~:~n ?Id~H~

, Sample Type: 

## c ARB mGWoa 

### ~ZS
- 

### CHIXW~

- Run Nunber: 

## D~R-~ Sample Box Number: 

### GB clean-up Man: Bclv~,~ 

# - SL Job Number: 

### 3

## q gc Comments :

FRONT HALF Filter Number: 

## bm-

# IF Description of Filter: 

### D?-7

ImpingeFinal Volume: 10% m 1 

### 90 m 1 

## i ml Initial Volume: 1 O0 ml 100 ml 0 ml Net Volumer m 1 m 1 ml Total H20: V Silica Gel Final Volume: 

### D g 9 9 Initial Volume 

### 646 9 9 Net Volume Q Total Moisture: Description of Impinger Catch: 

### C)-

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.Plant 

### GLPE'Sj71.A-IIh)~, ;A&.\<c; Date -Z -20 

# - ?n Sampling Location TIJLCT OJCT sample Type c4eR 425 Ct-lj?or~G RunNumber Db~-z Operator 3,\wed Ambient Temperature 6 TUF Barmetric Pressure 3;>,s8 Static Pressure (Pa -z.6 *H?O Filter Number(e) 

## wmf= Pretest Leak Rate

# --

cfm B (1.0 in. Hg Preteat Pitot Leak Check 0.19. Pretest Oreat Teak Check -~~-. Read a4Record all Data EXery 10 Mikutee'

. 

### - Schematic of 

# I Probe Length and Type Zo 'q\qss-,:,. , 1 ss Pitot Tube I.D. No. C-Tm .a 

### ., ,, Nozzle 1.n. No. 

### i ~IA-TF~ ' &'by P


### . - 

### --.. IV I Assumed Noisture , t 1 

### , o Temp. Readout S/N U .4, Meter Box Number I k Meter bllg 2.13 C Factor t.7~ Meter Gamma I .-1'7 

### ,,-. 

## . fieater BoxSettinq N.A.
< Reference Ap +&&+ 0.5-0 Post Test Leak Rate =or010cfm @ (ban. fig Post Test Pitot Leak ~?leck 

### ".I(. Traverse Point Layout Post %st Orsat Leak Check Q 4

.

### Plant: 

# LEN '5 c 

# PMW6 Date: r) 

## Source/Sample Number:

2. 

## Volume Hater Vapor Colleoted, Standard Conditions Ylo 

# = 

# .a noodensate from irnpingers and Silioa Gel v~(~t4) 

# = ,04707 

## V~O 

# =

.

# -6) 

# 70 aof

I.. :..

... I

. .: I-:.. 

### 3, 

## Percent Moisture, by 

## volume

4. 

## Holecular Heiqht, 

## Staok gas Dry 

## Molecular Hight

## Plant: Date:. 

## Source/Sampl e 

## Number: Y)/lA/? -

# 2

5, 

## Stack Gas Yelooity Average



## 6. 

## Staok YolurnetriC 

## Flow 

## Rate, 

## Aotual Conditions (Staok 

## Tent~erature and 

## Pressure) I



## 7. Staok 

## yolu~netric flow 

## rate, standard oonditiom (680 

## B, 28.82 

# Hs)

8. 

## 'Isokinetio VariationSAMPLE RE2OVERY DATX Plant: 

## Ge-e'~ f'\~*;dy 

### W*\<s

4 Date : 2-'2-0-40 Sampling Location: TA~JY 

### 47 

### SCR~BDER -LPJU=-T Sample Type: 

## c ARB MEWon 

### 92~ CH)~W~
- Run Number: 

### DmR- 

## 2 sample Box Number: 

# 4% Clean-up Manr 

## ~ack< 

# -S-

- Job Number : 

### 3 

## 7gs Comments :

E'RONT HALF Filter NunSer: 

## blu\R- 

## I= Description of Filter: 

### D?~7q I
Impingers Final Volume: 

# /c c! m1 

# @& m1 

## 0 m 1 ~nitial Volume: 1 O0 ml 100 ml Net Volume: m 1 Total H20: Silica Gel Final Volume : 

### &J-?, 

## if 9 g 9 Initial Volume 

### 6333 g Net Volume 

# /4,(? 9 9 

# T:

Total Moisture: Description of Impinger Catch: 

# *

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.SAMPLE EDVERY DATA Plant: 

### Ge-e1s 

### P1-i 4, 

### W-ls~ Date : 2 -Ye 

### -4s 

# - Sampling Location: 

### TA~Y 

### 4-2 

### SC~~BBER -L~J~-J Sample Type :-- 

## c ARB MEWan 

# e2~ c~nc;l.\tr/ Run Number: 

### DIW~GLk~ 

### ir) Sample Box Number: 

### 18 Clean-up Manr 

## PW~S- Sh Job Number: 

### 3qg5

FRONT HALF Filter Nuober: 

## bNR- 3 

## I= Description o f . F i l t e r :
MOISTURE Impingers Final Volume : (00 m 1 [ud m 1 0 rn 1 ml 100 Lril c3 Initial Volume: 1 ml Net Volume: m 1 m 1 rnl Total H20: 0 Silica Gel Final. Volume : 1,6Z1( g 9 9 Initial Volume 

### 6/,240 g 9 g Net Volume g 

### Q g Totdl Moisture: 0. \ Description of Impinger Catch: 

# I

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

# IFIELD DATA plant Gerre'~ 

## PLQ-~;~ 4r)srh~ Date 2-I\-70 I I Sampling Locatiorl 

### r4uk 

### 4-2 SC~~U~R W Sample Type 

### mug /Mbfjjo~f?< cI-)Rofi Run Number bmg-4- operator 5J/Yl@/tj Ambient Temperature 

### 5°F Baranetric Pressure 30.00 1' (+a - Static Preesure (Pe -2, 15'1f-+,c3A Filter Number (8) 

### DMR-YF Pretest Leak Rate =O.co7cfm @ /,c in. Hg 

## c Pretest Pitot Leak Check 

### 0. c.(r- - Pretest Orsat T~ak Check 40. 6 Read ard Record all Data Every 

### & Minutes Schematic of Traverse Point Layout

# - Probe Length and Type ~a''(2~.rr~;y~ Pitot Tube I.U. No. 5-'3A Nozzle I.D. NO. 

### i ~,AU~~U 

### 07p Aseumed Hoieture, s 1- 0 1 Temp. Readout S/N fi .A Meter Box Number I A U. Meter All@ 2.t3 C Factor 1-20 Meter Gamma 

### \*0\l lleater Box Setting N.A. Reference Ap O.?L Poet Test Leak Rate =O&Dcfm @ IZ,oin. lig Post Test Pi tot Leak Check 

### AX. U. Meter All@ 2.t3
Meter Gamma 

### \*0\l
Reference Ap O.?L Poet Test Leak Rate =O&Dcfm @ (Loin. lig - 

# -
.. Post Teat Orsat Leak Check d.A. 

# - dm, eF&Jhe& 

# *-

## Plant: 

## 2-21-40 

# Pkfi~ Date 

### : 

### Source/Sampl e 

## Number: 

# o4R-Y

2. 

## Volume Water Vapor Colleated, Standard Conditions Vlo 

# = 

# aa. 4 oondensate from inpingera and Silica Gel vw(atd) 

# = ,04707 Vlo 

# = - 

# /,fig sof

3, 

## Percent Moisture, by 

## volume



## 4. Molecular 

## Weiqht, Stack gas Dry 

## Molecular Wight
Md 

## = 0.440 (% 

## CO2) 

# + 0,320 

# (X 03) 

# + 0,280 

## (X,Na 

# + % 

## CO)

## Plant: 

# &EKE '5 

# pL+iM Date:.

# L-Y6 Source/Sarnpl e 

## Number:

, 

# fl~R-5'

5. 

## Stack Gas 

## Velooity Average



### 6. 

## Staoh VolurnetriC Flow Rate, 

## Aotual Conditions (Staok 

## Temperature 

## and Pressure) I



### 7. 

## Staok volurnetrio flow rate, standard oonditlone, (680 

### 8, 

## 28.82 

## Hrr) Q(atd)= 

## 17,64 Qo (1-8~8)

## b 

# = T8 Qiat~) 

# = 17,64(5&~ 

# )(i

# -om)( 12q6gq 

# I--
Qstd 

# = ,- 

## dsofm
8. 

## 'Isokinetio VariationSAMPLE RECOVERY DATA Plant: 

## Ge*e'~ P\4t; .r.\ a*\<s Date : *2- 

## z\-yo Sampling Location: 

### TA~K 42 SCSJBBER -L~JL~T

. Sample Type:

. 

### C RRS

. MEW'O~. 

### '?-2 - 

### s c~17&g D~R- 

# 'q

. . Run Number: Sample Box.Number:

E'RONT KAtF Filter Nunber: 

### ~MR- 

# 4F '~escription of Filter: 

### G C'eV /i
Impingers Final Volume : 

## 8'55 m 1 

## /4/ ml 

# 3 m 1 Initialvolume: 

### loo ml 100 ml 

### 0 ml Ne t Volume : 

# -4s nl 

### -t L/ 

# f ml -f 

# 3 ml

& Totdl HZOx Silica Gel Final Volume: 

### 6CS.f 9 g Initi a1 Volume 

### 64-1.T 9 9 9 Net Volume
Description 'of Impinger Catch: 

### C(ec,-

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES, INC.

# GFh!~, PLL,. Plant: I J - 

## Date: a-j-qc> 

### Source/Saaple 

## Number: &AR-C;

vrn(atd), =. - 

# linla3 dscf

2. 

### Volume 

## Hater Vapor Colleoted, Standard Conditions Vla 

# = 

# . 

# /LI~ oondensate from impinsera and Slllaa 

## Gel

3. 

### Percent 

## Moisture, by 

### volu~e

Bus 

# =

4. Molecular.

## Heic~ht,

## Staok gas Dry 

### Molecular Wight
Md 

## = 0,440 (% 

## COa) t.0.320 (X 

## Oa) 

# + 0.280 (X,.b 

## + % 

## CO)
Md 

## = 0.440( )+ 

## 0.320( I)+ 

## 0.280( 

# ) M* = 

# 29-0 lb/lb-mole '

### Plant: GPrp15 

# 4z+h1 Date:

. rC u 

## Source/Sanpl 

## e 

## Number:

5, 

### Stack 

### Gas 

## Velooity Average

6, 

## Stack 

## Volumetric Flow 

## Rate, 

## Aotual Conditions 

## (Stack Ternperatur.8 and 

## Pressure) 4



### 7. Stack 

## voluioetrio flow 

## rate, standard oonditlons (680 

## B, 20.82 Hg)



# .- 

# 2635 dsofrn I Qstd 

# = 8, 

### 'Isokinetio 

## VariationSAMPLE RE20VERY DATA Plant: Ge-e8s 

### f'\*~; 4 y
4 Date: 

### .Z-Z\-?OSampling Location: 

### TAN 

### 42 

### SCSJBG€R X~JLL~~ Sample Type : -- - 

### C AR8 MEW~~ 

### 4-25 CNR&K Run Number: 

## DMR- !i Sanple Box Number: 

# 28 Clean-up Man; 

## SI /L) Job Number: 

### 3

## q %< Comments :

FRONT HALF Filter Number: 

## bm- 

# F' Description of Filter: G 

### ' Y

Lnpingers Final Volume: 

### 108 ml 

# 92 m1 

## t ml D ~nitialvolume: loo ml 100 ml ml Net Volume: ml

. ml 

### J/ m 1 Total H20: Silica Gel Final Volume : 

### 703.3 9 9 9 ~nitial~olume

## '637,t 9 51 9 Net Volume 

## cE7C
v- 9 Totdl Moisture: Description of Impinger Catch: 

# .c~.ehs

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.FIELD DATA

. - C Sampling Location rjdk a Sample Type CARB p@

Ambient Temperature '7i)

### r

- Darcxnetric Pressure 2 <) tP+7']jc Static Pressure (PSI 

### - 2,'6''lIt0 Filter Number(s) Pretest Leak Rate

# - ~.o/Zcfrn @ in. Hq 

### - Pretest Pitot Leak Check 0. 

### k Heter Allg C Factor 1-20 Meter Gamma I*o\'l tleater Box Setting &.A- < Reference Ap r 6r.) Post Test Leak Rate =ccl\cfm

- @ !.?-in. llg 

## -. Pretest Oreat I~ak Check 

### - N. fi Schematic of Post Test Pitot Leak Check Read and Record all Data Every /O Minutes Traveree Point Layout Post Teat Orsat Leak Check AI.A-FIELD DATA
Date Samplirlg .Location 

### rep.jk 4-2 SC~~S~FQ 

### w- 

# I

Rur~ Number 

### ~MR-% operator SIMQ~ Ambient Temperahre 

### xac,F Barmetric Pressure 9-5l .f4/' 1-14 static ~reasure (pa) 

### --2,3.*'/4;5 Filter Number(s1 pfi&-

## $e Pretest Leak Rate -0~~cfrn @&din. Hg Pretest PitDt Leak Check 0.l~~ Pretest Orsat leak Check pl. A

# - nead ard Record a11 Data Every (0 Minutes - I Sclhema t lc of Traverse Point Layout

# - Probe Lerlgtl~ and Type T~''Qr,sr~;4 5 tG; ,les Pi tot Tube 1.1). 140. '5-2 A 

### - 

### --. Nozzle I.D. NO. 

### i ba*uTE~4o 

## P Asaumed Hoisture, \ 

### 1. o Temp. Readout S/N ,u .A Heter .Box Number 

### I 

### A Heter Alla 2-13 c! - C Factorll \ ~20 Heter Ganima l.0\7 lleater Box Settlng ju.A. Reference dp 

## 0.w Poat fist Leak Rate =&g,?frn @ fO.dn. 114 Post Test Pitot Leak Cl~eck 

### OX
- Poat ~ebt Orsat ~eak.CIleck ' &.A.

## Plant: 

# Gewj- f/d,k~ Date: 

### ,J-{-LFiO 

### Source/Smpl e 

## Number: 

# OMR- 

# 7

- 

## 2. Yolurns Water Yapor Colleuted, Standard Conditions 

## VLo 

## = 

# i47 oondensate from impingers and 

## Silios 

## Gel vucstd) 

# = ,04707 Yio 

# = 

# 0.642 sof
V~(8td) 

# = 

# --&&EL, mf
3, 

## Percent Moisture, by 

## volume

4 

### Molec~der 

## Weight, Stack gas 

### Dry 

### kolecular Hight

### Plant: 

# Ge. E'5 P/~Tx,di; Date: 

## ,2-a340

. 

### 5ource/Sampl 

## e Number: 

# - 

# 04 

# I?-?

5, St.-,k 

# as' Veloaity Average


## va iavt) 

# = 85,49 

## Cp 

# (w) ave

6. 

### Stack 

### YolumetriC Flow Ratep 

## AatuaP Conditions (Stack Tee-gerature 

## and Pressure) I

1 

### 7. 

### S; -.cB 

### voluinetrio 

## flow 

## rate, ~tandard oonditiona (680 

### 8, 

### 28.82 

# 1 H8) 

### ! I Q,-cd)= 

## 1?,64 Qe 

## (l-a~~) 

## b 

# = i

, 

# Te I 

### ~0s)(~4~~7).( 

# 37176) I 

## Q 

# = i7,64 

# -w i
dsofm 

# i
Qub6 

# = 

# ~CO 1 

# i l

a 

### 8 '1.: 

### ~kinetio 

## Variati

## onSAMPLE RE)=OVERY DATA plait: Gc-e's y\q+; 4 \ 

# a*\<&

4 Date,: 

### 2

# - 2/-70 Sampling Location: TArJY 

### 4-2

. 

### SCR~BEERxh1~67 Samp'le Type : C ARTL MEW'on 2 ~~fl~t?? 

### bm~- 6 

## ( BLwk 

## ) Run Number:. Sample Box Number: 

## 18

-
- - Clean-up Man: 

### Stmod
- Job Number: 

### 3 

# 4 Comments :

FRONT HALF
Filter Nunber: 

### ~MR- 

# 6 F Description Filter:
HOISTURE Impingezs Flnal Volume : / 06 ml 

## 9 ml n 1 Initialvolume: loo ml 100 ml ml Ne t Volume t m 1 m 1 rnl

Silica Gel Final Volume : 

### 6 44 

### -7 9 9 g mitialvolume ~4i.f -7 g 9 9 Nez Volune 9 S' 9 Total Moismre: Description of Impinger Catch: ~IU.

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES, INC.FIELD DATA I plant 

# cerrc '5 

### PLQ+;~ C301- 

### k* Probe Length and Type -LZ.L 

### "a,,rr-(-y d Date 

## s t*; PitotTutx 1.D.No. 5-3A Nozzle I.D. No. i, D,auTE~ Assumed Hoisture, \ 

### 1. o4-;Lp Temp. Readout S/N ,U .A operator HeCer Box Number 1 

### A Mlbient Temperature 

### - 

### '7SUF Meter Allg -2.15 Barmetric Pressure -$,q) C Factor 1.20 Static Pressure (P,) 

### - 2,T"/fZ0 EIJ~ +Ed LooklNt Meter Gamma 1.017 Filter Number(s) 

### IMP- / 

### OF 7013hSD5 ~rk(~ lleater apx Setting N-ACF~, 15 lr~~i pfl%R\ ~eferencd Ap 0.d~ 0. Post Test Leak Rate =d-@\&fin @ fD,oin. llg Pretest Oreat Teak Check @, A Scliematic of PostTest Pitot Leak~Gk Read an3 Record all Data Every (8 Minutes Traverse Point Layout Post Test Orsat Leak Check N.A.

# 1 plant: 

### PIk+/nq Date: w * 

# ' Source/SEp?Ni!er: 

# D/zilR-f

2, 

## Volume Water Vapor 

## Colleated, 

## standard Conditions 

## VLE 

# = 

# 12.2 aonde~,ate

## from 

## inpingers and Silica 

## Gel



# - - 

# 0.57(I scf YW(8td)



### 3, 

## Percent 

## Moisture, by 

## volume

4. 

## Molecular 

# Wai9ht, Stack gas 

## Dry 

## Molecular Wight 

## Ma 

## = 0.440 (X COz) 

# + 0. 

## 320-(X Oa) 

# + 0.280 (%,N2 

# + % 

### CO)

Me 

## = Ma t 

### Bus 

### (18-Md) 

# =( &q,0 

# )+( olC06 )(18- 

# &?b 

# )
Me 

## = 

# 'a3 ib/lb-mole

## Plant: 

# i,p& PidfiYq Date: w 

## Source/Sampl 

## e Number:

5,-Stack 

## Gas 

## Veloaity 

## Average

6

# . Stack 

## Volumetric 

## Flow Rate Autual 

## Goaditi osts 

## (8ta~k 

## Temperature 

## and Pressure) I

Q(8td) 

# =
Q~td 

# = dsofm 7. 

## Staok 

## volurnetrio flow gate, 

## standardaonditloas (680 

### 8, 

### 29.92 

## H~)

.. . 

# / 8. 

## -1sokinetio 

## Variation 

# iSAMPLE RE2OVERY DATA

Date: 

### 2-2-2-40 Sapling Location: 

### TA~Y 42 

### SCR~BB~~ -rFJzf7 Sanple Type : 

### C ARB MEWcn 

### 92r CH\~&K Run Nder: 

### DmR- 

# ASample Sox Number: 

# / 

# & " Clean-up Man: 

## S\mod Job Nunber: 

## 3q%c Comments:

FRONT HALF Filter Number: 

## bm- 

# $ I= Description of Filter:
HOISrn Impinge3 Final Volume : 

# /a

# 9 m 1 

# 77 m 

### 1 ml Initial Volume: to0 ml 100 ml ml Net Volume: 

### m 1 $ ml ml Totdl H20: 

## -16
Silica Gel Final Volume: 

## 10s 

## .7 '3 9 9 Initia 1 Volume 

# 677-5 Q Q g Nec Volune Total Moisture: Description of Impinger Catch:

I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. I:IFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC..SAMPLE RD=OVEXY DATA

Date: 

## 2-72-5'0 Sampling Location: TA~Y 7 

### SCR~BE€R -cdefT Sample Type: 

### C RR8 MEWon 

## 7-2-r CH\?&K

- Run Number: 

# DMR-$4

, sample 

### ox NU^: 

### 2 

## G 

# [&-\4 Clean-up Manx 

# s\/n oIJ 30bNumber: 

### 3q85 Comments :

E'RONT HALF Filter Nuzber: 

# ~MQ-q F 'Description of Filter:

Lmpingezs Final Volme: ID a ml ml 6 ml 

# I ~ni ti a1 volume : 1 

### nil I 00 nil. 

## o ml 

# I
Ne t Volume : TO tdl HZO: Silica Gel Final Volume: 

## 6w-9 g 9 9 Initi a 1 Volume 

### tA??- 

# < 9 g 9 Net Volume g., 9 Q Totil Moi sture : 

# I Description of Lmpinger CaVh:

I PACIFICENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. I

### 5, 

## Stack Gas 

## Velooity Average

6, 

## Stack 

## YolumetriC 

## Flon RateD

## Aotual Conditions 

## (Staok Temperature and 

## Pressure) I 

### Qs 

# = 60 Vs 

## A 

# = 60 

# (9,~;)(0$$& 

# ) 

# 26 S6 &e 

# = &of 

## m
7. 

## Staok volu~netric flow 

## rate, standard 

## oonditlons (680 

### 8, 

### 29.82

a 

## H$) \

1 ' 

### 8, 

## 'Isokinetia Yariatio.n

### Plant: 

# GE~E's @in.hq

4 

### Date: 

### 9-27-40 

### Source/Sampl 

## e 

## Number: ~NI /Q 

## -I(?

2. 

## Yolurce 

## Water 

## vapor 

## Colleoted, Btandard Conditions Y~o 

# = , 

# 4 condensate 

## from irnpingers and Silloa Gel 

# 0, [8$ vu(std) 

# = ,04707 

## Vlo 

# = 60f



### 3. 

## Percsnt Moisture, by 

## volume

4. 

### Molecular 

# sight, Staak 

## ges a 

## Dry Molecular Hight 

## Ma 

## = 0.440 

### (X 

### COa) 

## + 0.320 (X. Oa) t 

## 0.280 (X;Na 

# * % 

## CQ)

# I SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA plant: 

## Gc*e'~ f'\qt; 4 \ W*\c5

4 

# 2- 2-2-70 Date : Sanpllng Location: 

### -TA~Y 

### 42 StTd%D€R zhlLL-)7 Sample Type: C AR% ME7Hon 

### 4-2s CHR~/'~~

- Run Number: 

### D~U-? 

# I Sample Box Number: 

## q+% Clean-up Man: S\r\od Job Nunber : 

## 34 5 

# I Comments: 

### T-P--u b~f- UGS LL- 5. ?.,-lo S- (1 rc ws 5~ 7- UVC- 

### - -07 I->-&- Fad3 

### 5%-i-re .-d5?-~.' A\sa 

## s%f;t3t pC& 1'- c".c 

# r4, 3 I FRONT KALF Filter Number: ~PQ- 

## I= ~escrlption of Filter:

Lmpir.ge,-s 

# 1. Final Volume: 

# 7'2 ml 

### (12 ml 

## # ml 

# I I

Initi 21 volume : 100 ml 100 !Id 

# 0 Net Volme: 

## -,J2 ml 

# +- 1-2 m 1 Total H20: 

# ~ Silica Gel 

### 7'74; $ Final Volume : 9 9 9 

### C85.1 1nZtial Volume 9 Net Volume 

# /7 

# 7 9 

# +5 Total Moismre:

I PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

### I
Ii I I I I 

# i

Description of Lmpinger Cakh: 

## i 

# ISAMPLE RECOVERY DATA Plant: 

### Gene's ?\&ti 4, 

### W-\<s

4 Date : C- 

### 27

## -4 0 Sampling Location: 

### TA~ t( 4-2 

### SCR~BB 

## En zrl.~~=~T Sample Type: 

## c RR% ME7Hon 

### 7-2s CM\X&K Run Number: 

## bmR

# -lo Sample Box Number: 

# 36 Clean-up Man: 

### .!i\Md Job Nunber: 

# 34%~ Comments :

F'RONT RALT Filter Nunber: 

## ~MR- t-rd-- Description of Filter:

Zapingers Finhi Volume: 

## 90 ml 

## 93 ml 

# I m 1 ~nitial volume: 1 O0 ml 100 ml 

### 0 d Net Volume: ml ml 

### ml Total HZO: Silica Gel Final Volume : 

## 64.t. 1 9 

### Q 9 ~ni ti a1 Volume 

### 6'2-4.1 ., g 

### Q. 9 Net Volume - 

### P 9 Total Noistxre: Description, of Lmpinger Catch: 

### .L 

### ICW

PAClFlC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

# wf3 pL4+;* Pl 

## ant: Date: .3 72

## 7- 

## 40 J 

### Source/Sampl e 

## Number: 

## OIAk -/ 

# 1

2 a 

## Volume 

## Hater Vapor Colleoted,, Standard Conditions
VIO 

## = 

# d1.R oondensate from impingers and 

## silica Gel vwcatct) 

# = ,04707 

## lo 

# = 

# 6016 802 V~(atc) 

# = 

# /(026 SO^

3, 

## Percent 

## Moisture, by 

## volume



## 4. Molecclar -Weight, 

## Stack gas Dry 

## Molecular Night 

## Mc = 0,440 (X 

### COz) t 

## 0,320 (% 

## Oa) t 

## 0,280 (X,.N2 

## + % 

### CO)
Md 

## = 0.440( 

# )+0.320( 

# ,)+ 0.280(
Md 

## = .A 

## Ib/lb-mole ' 

# )

### ~1

## ant: 

# ~P<C 

# 3- ?iptii.o Date:. 

# 4-,4?4'0 1 

## 5ource/Sampl 

## e Number: 

# fl~e-//

5, 

### St..-'ic 

### Gea 

## Yelooity Average

. .. iave) 

# = 85.49 Cp 

# (q) BVg



### 6. 

## Stack 

## Yolumetric Flow Rate, 

## Autual Conditio~s (Stauk 

## Te.-derature and 

## Pressure) I



### 7, S:.-.zk 

## volurnetrio flow zatep standard oonditboll~4 (680 8, 

### 29,92 

### El?)

8, 

## 'I.r,~kinetio VariationSAYPLE FLECOVERY DATA Plant: Ge*el~ Y\4*; 4q 

### W*\<S

d Date: 

## 2-~q- 40 Sampling Location: 

### TA~Y 

### 47 S~qdlf~En zr~~67 Sample Type : 

## c ARIL 

### /L\€won 

### 92s ~~\70/+\tr' Run Number: 

### bmR- I\ Sample BOX Number: 

## 38 Clean-up Manr $\Mo~ - Job Nunher: 

## 34%~ Connents :

Filter Number: 

## bMR- !\F Description of Filter:

Impingem Findl Volume: 

### 40 ml 110 

### ml 

## I m 

### l In1 ti a1 volune : 1 

# * ml 100 ml 

### 0 ml Net Volume : m1 m 1 m 1

Silica Gel Find Volume: 

# kt?..B 9 9 F Initiel Volume 

# ~4.0 a 9 Net Volume 9 Total Moisture: Descziption of Impinger Cakh: 

### C\PW

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.SAMPLE RB2OVERY DATA

Date : Sampling Location: -~A~JY 

### 47 Scqd$Bgn -L~JL&~T

MEWon 

### P2* CH\?&~ Sanple Type: 

## c RRTL - Run Nuher: 

### DnR-

# /'a Sanpie %x Number: Clean-up Manr job Number: 

### 3

## q gc Comments :

%ONT 'HALF' 

## bMR-(2 

## F ?il ter Nu&==: Description of Filter:

up1 ngers Final Voluse : m

### l 

# 100 ml ml Initialvolume: lo*

. ml 100 ml ml Ner. Volume: 

### nl ml 

### ml

Silicc Gel Flnrl Volume : 

# (2578 g 

### Q Q Ir.1ti a1 Volume a 

## G57,2 9 9 9 Net Volune 9 9 9 Tot& Moismre:

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.