alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for July 2021

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 19

2. Cases Added to Docket 0 

 

3. Cases Subtracted from Docket -1 

Roy Rock, LLC 

No. 18-0068

Decision issued on July 22, 2021

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 18
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 222 (Monday, November 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90694-90695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26818]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GULF COAST ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION COUNCIL

[Docket No.: 111132024-1111-05]

Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council (GCERC).

ACTION: Notice of Performance Review Board (PRB) appointments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the members of the Senior Executive 
Service (SES) Performance Review Board. The PRB is comprised of a 
Chairperson and a mix of state representatives and career senior 
executives that meet annually to review and evaluate performance 
appraisal documents and provide a written recommendation to the 
Chairperson of the Council for final approval of each executive's 
performance rating, performance-based pay adjustment, and performance 
award.

DATES: The board membership is applicable beginning on January 1, 2024 
and ending on December 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary S. Walker, Executive Director, 
Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council, telephone 504-210-9982.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
persons named below have been selected to serve on the PRB:

Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council

Walker, Mary S., Executive Director, [email protected], 
504-210-9982

[[Page 90695]]

Department of Interior

Blanchard, Mary Josie, Deputy Director, Environmental Protection 
Compliance, [email protected], 202-208-3406

State of Florida

Blalock, Adam, Deputy Secretary for Ecosystem Restoration, 
[email protected], 850-245-2118

State of Alabama

Blankenship, Chris, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Conservation 
and Natural Resources, [email protected], 334-242-3486

Environmental Protection Agency

Wyatt, Marc, Director, Gulf of Mexico Division, [email protected], 
228-679-5915

Keala J. Hughes,
Director of External Affairs & Tribal Relations, Gulf Coast Ecosystem 
Restoration Council.
[FR Doc. 2024-26818 Filed 11-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-58-P
```
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on February 28, 2013

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 07-1796

Pullman Power, 

LLC, and its 

successors

09/24/08 DFR Chairman Rogers

2 08-1292

Wal-Mart 

Distribution Center 

#6016

01/12/10 DFR 01/25/10 Closed Commissioner 

Attwood

3 08-0866

Southern Pan 

Services 

Company

04/15/10 DFR 05/05/10 Closed

4 08-1547 United States 

Postal Service 04/29/10 DFR 05/21/10 Closed

5 08-1318 LJC Dismantling 

Corp. 05/04/10 DFR 05/24/10 Closed

6 09-0004 Stark Excavating, 

Inc. 06/15/10 DFR 06/28/10 Closed

7 09-0005 Stark Excavating, 

Inc. 06/15/10 DFR 06/28/10 Closed

8 07-0437

Cleveland 

Wrecking 

Company

07/28/10 DFR 09/22/10 Closed

9 09-1072

Boh Brothers 

Construction 

Company, LLC

08/25/10 DFR 09/01/10 Closed

10 09-1048 Brand Energy 

Solutions LLC 09/02/10 DFR 09/07/10 Closed

11 08-1656

Central Florida 

Equipment 

Rentals, Inc.

09/08/10 DFR 10/22/10 Closed

12 10-0265 Jesco, Inc. 12/30/10 DFR 02/02/11 Closed

13 09-1278 Otis Elevator 

Company 02/14/11 DFR 03/01/11 Closed

14 10-0551

Ryder 

Transportation 

Services

04/05/11 DFR 05/03/11 Closed

15 09-1013 Wal-Mart Stores, 

Inc. 04/06/11 DFR 04/19/11 Closed Commissioner Attwood

16 09-1451

All Erection & 

Crane Rental 

Corp.

04/13/11 DFR 04/27/11 Closed

17 10-0610 E.R. Zeiler 

Excavating, Inc. 05/16/11 DFR 05/27/11 Closed

18 08-1386 Delek Refining, 

Ltd. 06/08/11 DFR 06/14/11;05/29/12 Closed
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on February 28, 2013

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

19 10-2659

Jacobs Field 

Services North 

America

10/27/11 DFR 11/22/11 Closed

20 09-1901 Seward Ship’s 

Drydock, Inc. 11/14/11 DFR 11/21/11 Closed

21 10-1697 Spirit 

AeroSystems, Inc. 12/14/11 DFR 12/22/11 Closed

22 10-1055

Bardav, Inc., d/b/a 

Martha’s Vineyard 

Mobile Home Park

03/02/12 DFR 03/29/12 Closed

23 09-1184 Dana Container, 

Inc. 03/28/12 DFR 04/25/12 Closed

24 11-0146 Lake Erie 

Construction Co. 05/18/12 DFR 05/24/12 Closed

25 10-1372 Briones Utility 

Company 08/20/12 DFR 09/05/12 Closed

26 12-0318 Torre Mackle 

Group, LLC 09/27/12 DFR 10/04/12 Closed

27 08-1774 Angelica Textile 

Services, Inc. 09/28/12 DFR 10/16/12 Closed

28 10-2313

Charles W. 

Mason, DDS & 

Associates, PLLC

10/22/12 DFR 11/15/12 Closed

29 12-0379 Monroe Drywall 

Construction, Inc. 12/28/12 DFR 01/04/13 Open

30 11-2395 Kiewit Power 

Constructors Co. 01/24/13 DFR

31 12-0643 K.M. Davis 

Contracting, Inc. 01/25/13 DFR 01/30/13 Open

* DFR – Direction for Review

REM – Appellate Remand

INT REV - Interlocutory Review
Exhibit 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT



Board of Directors

Airborne, Inc.

Seattle, Washington



We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-83052, 333-55282, 33-3713, 33-39720, 33-51651, 33-58905, and 333-55687 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-88102 on Form S-3 of Airborne, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) of our report dated February
25, 2003 (April 25, 2003 as to Notes G, I, and U (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in the Companys method of accounting for major engine overhaul costs)), included in this
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Airborne, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP                            
|DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP April 25, 2003 Seattle, Washington
*Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."

Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60339 

Summary Calendar

__________________

JANE DOE II,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM T. FERRELL, JR.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:94-CV-86

_________________________________________________________________

December 14, 1995

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

the defendant's motion for summary judgment. She argues that there

remained genuine issues of material fact concerning her claims

against the defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under Mississippi

tort law. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM for

essentially the reasons given by the district court. Doe v.

Ferrell, No. 5:94-CV-86 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 28, 1995).

A F F I R M E D.
Page 1 of 1 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on August 31, 2022

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 16-1713 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

2 16-1813 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

3 16-1872 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

4 17-0023 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

5 17-0279 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

 6 18-0242 Onekey, LLC 02/05/21 DFR 02/18/21 Closed

 7 18-0731

UHS of Delaware, Inc. and 

Premier Behavioral Health 

Solutions of Florida, Inc. d/b/a 

Suncoast Behavioral Health 

Center

05/19/21 DFR 05/21/21 Closed

8 18-1287 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Closed

 9 18-1288 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Closed

10 18-0701 Midvale Paper Box Company, 

Inc. 10/21/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

11 20-0762 CentiMark Corporation 10/27/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

12 20-0653 Eastern Gas Transmission and 

Storage, Inc. 10/28/21 DFR 11/05/21 Closed

13 19-0622 Anthony Marano Co. 02/10/22 DFR 02/16/22 Closed

14 20-0541 Harvey Builders d/b/a Harvey 

Cleary Builders 03/03/22 DFR 03/11/22 Closed

15 19-0550

UHS of Denver, Inc., d/b/a 

Highlands Behavioral Health 

System

03/31/22 DFR 04/06/22 Closed

16 21-0432 Ariana Murrell-Rosario d/b/a 

Liberty Tax Service 07/01/22 DFR 07/13/22 Open

17 20-1212 Roy Rock, LLC 07/14/22 DFR 07/15/22 Open

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification PursuantTo 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Polymer Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Willis C. Moore, III,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: May 10, 2007 |     | /s/ WILLIS C. MOORE, III   |
|-------------------------|----------|----------------------------|
|                    |     | Willis C.  Moore, III |
|                    | * * | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SUNBEAM CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         40,799
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  408,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                   44,344
<INVENTORY>                                    460,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               937,947
<PP&E>                                         596,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,132,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          626,250
<BONDS>                                        2,164,002
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,007
<OTHER-SE>                                     (60,347)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,132,349
<SALES>                                        2,397,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,397,979
<CGS>                                          1,793,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,793,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               13,249
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             200,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (293,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,824)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (299,519)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (299,519)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (2.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.97)



</TABLE>
#### Trautmann, Respondent, vs. Charles Schefft & Sons Company, imp., Appellant.

*December 5, 1929*

March *4, 1930.*

For the appellant Charles Schefft & Sons Company there was a brief by *Hoyt, Bender, Trump, McIntyre & Hoyt*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Rodger M. Trump.*

For the administrator there was a brief by *Schoets, Williams &*Gandrey.of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Alfred R. Gandrey.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *McGovern, Curtis, Devos & Reiss*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Wallace H. Reiss.*

The following opinion was filed January 7, 1930:

Fritz, J.

This case involves the same facts and questions of law, excepting as to the damages, as the companion case of *Raymond Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co. et al.,*which is decided herewith *(ante,*p. 113, 228 N. W. 741), and the decision in that case rules this.

*123*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed as to the defendant Charles Schefft & Sons Company by dismissing the complaint and cross-complaint as to said defendant. Cause remanded, with directions to enter judgment accordingly.

A motion for a rehearing was denied on March 4, 1930.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7238

VIRGIL A. TREECE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; GERALDINE P. MIRO,

Warden; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney

General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-96-3460-3-19BC)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Virgil A. Treece, Appellant Pro Se. Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Treece v. South Carolina, No. CA-96-3460-3-19BC (D.S.C. Aug. 21,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Si()-l()04()5-()ni 

MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY 

OF THE 

CITY OF FARGO 

M;irch:-l.:OIO 

The Jioiioniblc Rastnotul II . l,;il IIKHI 

Sccrelar> 

U.S. Department of I ransporlation 

1200Ne\vJerscy Ave. SIWashington. DC 20590 

Dnckci DOT-OS r-2010-MH 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

On behalf of tlie Municipal Airpori .^iitlmrily olihe C ity of l aruo. North Dakota, thank yon lor 

the opportunity to cxpre.s.s our .'iuppori for the application for antitrnsl immnniiy and proposed 

joint business agreement filed by American Airlines iu\d .lapan .Airlines. Wo bclie\e that the 

proposed alliance between these t\vo airlines is vital for oiu'worki to compete eifectively with the 

Star and Sky Team alliance. The increased inlcralliancc competition will enhance ilie henel'its oi' 

the Department's Open Skies policy first by solidifyinii U.S.-.lapan Open Skies, then by ser\ ini; 

as a foundativ>n for further liberali/ation across .Asia uhich is impiirianl for our business 

community's abilil) to efllciently conduct ulobal ciMnmerce. 

following \t>ur thorough rev iex\. v\e encourage llie Dcpartincni of I ran.s()ortation to approve this 

application. Your approval would enable these oncworld alliance airlines to work clo>eI\ together 

to deliver highly competitive air transponation services which will benefit the traveling public. 

.Appnnal for AA.'JAL alliance u ill ha\c a pixsiiise impact on air ira\el b> offering customers 

more service, .scheduling and pricing opli<ins and will help lo ensure that customers continue to 

benefit from having three conjpetitive air alliances from which to choose. 

We appreciate your quick approval o) this application. 

Sincerely. 

Shawn A. Dobbersiein. A.A.I-. 

l*!.\ecutive Director 

-^\ . .'\-

P.O. Box 2845 f.irgo. ,\D S8)0 8 70 1-24 1 150 1 fax 701•241-153 8
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

     I, Joanna Hoover, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ITIS Holdings Inc.,
a Nevada corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a ) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure
     internal control over financial reporting.

     Date:  July 11, 2005
     --------------------

     /s/ Joanna Hoover
     -----------------
     Name: Joanna Hoover
     Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 687 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 687

    To direct the Secretary of Defense to eliminate the backlog in 
   satisfying requests of former members of the Armed Forces for the 
      issuance or replacement of military medals and decorations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 1999

  Mr. Harkin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of Defense to eliminate the backlog in 
   satisfying requests of former members of the Armed Forces for the 
      issuance or replacement of military medals and decorations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Expedited Military Medals 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF BACKLOG IN REQUESTS FOR REPLACEMENT OF MILITARY 
              MEDALS AND OTHER DECORATIONS.

    (a) Sufficient Resourcing Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
make available funds and other resources at the levels that are 
necessary for ensuring the elimination of the backlog of the 
unsatisfied requests made to the Department of Defense for the issuance 
or replacement of military decorations for former members of the Armed 
Forces. The organizations to which the necessary funds and other 
resources are to be made available for that purpose are as follows:
            (1) The Army Reserve Personnel Command.
            (2) The Bureau of Naval Personnel.
            (3) The Air Force Personnel Center.
            (4) The National Archives and Records Administration
    (b) Condition.--The Secretary shall allocate funds and other 
resources under subsection (a) in a manner that does not detract from 
the performance of other personnel service and personnel support 
activities within the Department of Defense.
    (c) Replacement Decoration Defined.--For the purposes of this 
section, the term ``decoration'' means a medal or other decoration that 
a former member of the Armed Forces was awarded by the United States 
for military service of the United States.

SEC. 3. REPORT.

    Not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the 
status of the backlog described in section 2(a). The report shall 
include a plan for eliminating the backlog.
                                 <all>
```