alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2367]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   A TRIBUTE TO MAURICE WRIGHT, M.D.

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. EDOLPHUS TOWNS-

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. TOWNS. Madam Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute and to honor 
Dr. Maurice Wright. Dr. Wright is the chief of the Emergency Department 
and president of the Medical Board at the Woodhull Medical and Mental 
Health Center. A graduate of Fordham University and the Albert Einstein 
College of Medicine, he did his medical training at St. Luke's-
Roosevelt Hospital from 1987 to 1990, after which he continued to work 
in the Emergency Department as an attending and later as the assistant 
director until 1997.
  Dr. Wright joined the Woodhull Staff on April 1997 as the associate 
director of the Emergency Department and was promoted to chief of the 
Emergency Department in 1998. In addition, he has held several academic 
appointments, including assistant clinical professor of medicine at 
Columbia University and Medical Director of the Harlem CUNY Physician 
Assistant Program at the Sophie Davis School of Biomedical Sciences. He 
is also a member of several professional organizations, including the 
American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), The American College 
of Physicians (ACP), the National Association of Public Hospitals 
Health System (NAPHHS), and is also a graduate of the Physician 
Leadership Institute of the NAPHHS '03.
  As a visionary leader, he strives to foster teamwork and inspire 
excellence. While managing a high volume emergency department, he has 
achieved a high standard of care that is responsive to community needs 
and concerns. Among his accomplishments at Woodhull, Dr. Wright 
embarked on a continuous clinical performance improvement program with 
outstanding results in cardiac, asthma and abdominal pain care among 
others. This vigorous program is supported by evidence-based practice 
guidelines and frequent emergency medicine conferences. He was recently 
honored by the New York State Physician Assistant Society as its 
Physician of the Year for his clinical teaching and leadership.
  Madam Speaker, I would like to recognize Dr. Maurice Wright for his 
extraordinary accomplishments at the Woodhull Medical and Mental Health 
Center.
  Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in paying tribute to 
Dr. Maurice Wright.

                          ____________________
```
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for December 2019

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month					24

2. Cases Added to Docket						1

Coleman Hammons Construction Co., Inc.
No. 17-0992 
Mandate from Fifth Circuit Issued December 30, 2019

  
3. Cases Subtracted From Docket					 0



4. Total Cases Pending End of Month					25
Exhibit 32(f)

                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Savannah
Electric and Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2003, we, the
undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our
knowledge and belief, that:

     (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Savannah Electric and Power Company
          for the year ended December 31, 2003, which this statement
          accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of
          Savannah Electric and Power Company for the year ended December 31,
          2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of Savannah Electric and Power
          Company.



                                                      /s/A. R. James
                                                       A. R. James
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer



                                                    /s/Kirby R. Willis
                                                     Kirby R. Willis
                                         Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                                     and Treasurer

Date:  March 1, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10857]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            PETITIONS, ETC.

  Under clause 3 of rule XII, petitions and papers were laid on the 
clerk's desk and referred as follows:

       340. The Speaker presented a petition of the National Urban 
     League, relative to a letter asking for an economic stimulus 
     that meets the urgent needs of the nation; to the Committee 
     on Education and Labor.
       341. Also, a petition of the Polish Legion of American 
     Veterans, relative to a resolution opposing the removal of 
     memorials honoring heroic veterans; to the Committee on House 
     Administration.
```
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 September 2005 — Heinen v Commission

(Case T-181/04) (1)

(Officials - Internal competition - Oral test - Non-placement on the reserve list - Choice of language - Breach of the notice of competition - Equality of treatment)

(2005/C 257/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties:

Applicant(s): Nathalie Heinen (Ottignies, Belgium) (represented by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by L. Lozano Palacios and M. Velardo, Agents)

Application for:

Annulment of the decision of the Selection Board for internal competition COM/PB/02 awarding the applicant, for the oral test, insufficient marks for her to be placed on the reserve list for recruitment.

Operative part of the judgment:

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 190 of 24.7.2004.

----
#### Manhattan Brass Co., Appellant, *v.*Albert P. Reger.

*Sale*— Rescission—Misrepresentations—Partnership.

Where a partnership makes a false statement to a mercantile agency and subsequently is dissolved and a new firm is organized under the same name, and goods are sold to the new firm before the statement to the mercantile agency comes to the knowledge of the vendor, the sale of the goods cannot be subsequently rescinded by the vendor, on the ground that the statement to the mercantile agency was false.

Argued April 12, 1895.

Appeal, No. 18, Jan. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June T., 1891, No. 903, on verdict for defendant.

Before Green, Williams, McCollum, Dean and Fell, JJ.

Affirmed.

Sheriff’s interpleader to determine the ownership of goods taken in execution.

The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

The court gave binding instructions for defendant.

Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.

*Error assigned*was above instruction.

*John Sparhawk, Jr.,*for appellants.

*Charles Francis Gummey, Jr., M. Hampton Todd*with him, for appellee.

*645May 30, 1895:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Fell,

For some years prior to March 1, 1891, P. A. Reger and C. A. Reger were partners trading as Perry A. Reger & Bro. On the date named the partnership was dissolved, and a new partnership, the members of which were P. A. Reger and C. T. Hickman was formed, and the same firm name was retained. The statement as to the financial condition of Perry A. Reger & Bro., which it is claimed was the basis of the credit given, was made by the old firm to a mercantile agency on Dec. 30, 1890, and not communicated to the plaintiff until July 30, 1891. The merchandise in question was sold to the new firm in June, 1891.

From these facts it follows that the learned judge was clearly right in directing a verdict for the defendant in the inter-pleader. The right to rescind the contract of sale was based upon the alleged falsity of a statement made not in relation to the defendant in the execution, but in relation to another party, and not communicated to the plaintiff until after the goods were sold. The facts do not raise the legal questions elaborately argued by the appellant’s counsel, and it is unnecessary to consider them.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26577]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 15, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 646 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-300, K2025-298.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26577 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.4 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation for the quarter ended March 31,
2004, I, Thomas E. Legro, Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer of Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  (1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation. May 11, 2004
    
    /s/ THOMAS E. LEGROThomas E. LegroVice President, Controller andChief Accounting OfficerIndiantown CogenerationFunding Corporation
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation and will be retained by
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report of SentoCorporation (the “**Company**”) onForm 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Anthony J. Sansone, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 9, 2004                    |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/ ANTHONY  J. SANSONE                |   |
| Anthony J.  Sansone                    |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

----
Opinion filed June 17 , 202 1



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___ _

__ _

____ 

### No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 092

- CR

____ __ _____ 

### MELVIN JOHNATAY HENRY , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 104th District Court Tay lor County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2 2 018 B

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant entered into a plea agreement with the State . Pursuant to that plea agreement, Appellant pleaded guilty to t he third

- degree felony offense of possession
of cocaine

. T he trial court assessed Appellant’s punishment , in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, at imprisonment for seven years

. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal

.2 T his court notified A ppellant by letter that the t rial c ourt had certified that th is
is a plea bargain case in which Appellant has no right of appeal

. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d) ; see also T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN . art

. 44.02 (West
2018 )

. We requested that A ppellant respond and show grounds to continue the appeal . We have received a response from Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel in which counsel agrees that Appellant has no right to appeal and that this appeal should be dismissed. Counsel notes that Appellant’s assertions can be addressed in a postc onviction writ of habeas corpus

. Rule 25.2(a)(2) provides that, in a plea bargain case in which the punishment does not exceed the punishment agreed to in the plea bargain, “a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal , or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute .” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2)

. Subsections (A), (B), and (C) are not applicable here. We note t hat Rule 25.2 does not permit a plea

- bargaining defendant to appeal matters related to the voluntariness of the plea bargain

— unless the defendant has obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. See Cooper v. State , 45 S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim. App. 2 001);
Carender v. State , 155 S.W.3d 929, 931 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2005, no pet.).
The documents on file in th is appeal reflect that Appellant entered into a plea bargain , that h is punishment wa s assessed in accordance with the plea bargain , and
that he waived h is right of appeal. T he trial court certified that Appellant has no right of appeal

. Both the plea agreement and t he trial court’s certification w ere signed by Appellant, Appellant ’s trial counsel , and the judge of the trial court. T he
documents on file in this court sup port the trial court’s certification

. See Dears v.
State , 154 S.W.3d 610 , 613

– 14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)

. Accordingly , we must3 dismiss t h is appeal without further action. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 6 75, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). This appeal is dismissed

.

PER CURIAM

June 17, 2021 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J., Trott er , J., and W illiams , J.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 37 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Congress and the President should 

prioritize the reduction and elimination, over a reasonable period of 

time, of the overall trade deficit of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2017 

Mr. BROOKS of Alabama (for himself and Mr. LIPINSKI) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Congress and the 

President should prioritize the reduction and elimination, 

over a reasonable period of time, of the overall trade 

deficit of the United States. 

Whereas the United States has run 41 consecutive years of 

trade deficits; 

Whereas the trade deficit of the United States has substantially increased in the last 25 years; 

Whereas the overall trade deficit of the United States in 

2016 was $502.3 billion; 

Whereas the manufacturing sector of the United States has 

suffered a disproportionate impact from such trade deficits, resulting in substantial losses of jobs and industries; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 37 IH 

Whereas a robust manufacturing capability is essential for 

national security; 

Whereas trade imbalances are unhealthy for the global economy and stagnate economic growth in deficit countries 

such as the United States and especially in the manufacturing sectors of such countries; 

Whereas certain foreign trading partners of the United 

States are running persistent trade surpluses against the 

United States as an economic growth alternative to fostering the domestic consumption of their manufacturers; 

Whereas persistent trade deficits hinder the ability of the 

United States to reach full employment and increase 

underemployment and reliance on low-wage and often 

part-time service sector jobs; and 

Whereas the United States national interest in trade policy 

lies in strategically reducing and eliminating its currently 

massive trade deficit, including a deficit in trade in 

goods, and reducing and eliminating dependency of foreign countries on United States demand for goods of 

such countries: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that Con3 gress and the President should prioritize the reduction and 

4 elimination, over a reasonable period of time, of the overall 

5 trade deficit of the United States. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 14, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 623 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-269, K2025-267.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26383 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
E2386 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks December 10, 2008 

SENATE COMMITTEE MEETINGS 

Title IV of Senate Resolution 4, 

agreed to by the Senate on February 4, 

1977, calls for establishment of a system for a computerized schedule of all 

meetings and hearings of Senate committees, subcommittees, joint committees, and committees of conference. 

This title requires all such committees 

to notify the Office of the Senate Daily 

Digest—designated by the Rules Committee—of the time, place, and purpose 

of the meetings, when scheduled, and 

any cancellations or changes in the 

meetings as they occur. 

As an additional procedure along 

with the computerization of this information, the Office of the Senate Daily 

Digest will prepare this information for 

printing in the Extensions of Remarks 

section of the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD

on Monday and Wednesday of each 

week. 

Meetings scheduled for Thursday, December 11, 2008 may be found in the 

Daily Digest of today’s RECORD.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection
with the Quarterly Report of National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership (“NPAMLP”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Robert McKinney, President of Feldman International, Inc., the Equity General Partner of NPAMLP certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) Information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NPAMLP.



| | National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | (Registrant)                                         
| |                                                      
| | Date:                                                
| |                                                      
| | By:                                                  
| |                                                      
| | By:                                                  
| | Name:                                                
| | Title: