alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23







INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-54998 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 2-80776, 33-2139, 33-7901,
33-15062,  33-43635,  33-62799, 33-59803,  333-82157,  333-82161,  333-87773 and
333-73194 on Form S-8 of Albertson's,  Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated
March 25, 2004 (which  report  expresses  an  unqualified  opinion and  includes
explanatory  paragraphs  relating  to  changes  in  methods  of  accounting  for
goodwill, closed stores and vendor funds and to the stock purchase agreement the
Company  entered into with J Sainsbury plc and JS USA  Holdings  Inc. to acquire
all of the  outstanding  capital stock of the entities which conduct J Sainsbury
plc's U. S. retail  grocery store  business)  appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Albertson's,  Inc. and  subsidiaries for the year ended January 29,
2004.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boise, Idaho
March 25, 2004
<PAGE>
                      AMERCO and Consolidated Subsidiaries

      Exhibit 12.  Statement Re: Computation of Ratios

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Year end
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                           2002    2001    2000    1999    1998
                                        ---------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>       <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>
Pretax earnings from operations         $   5.0     5.8    99.7    94.7    75.0
Plus:  Interest expense                   116.3   114.6    99.9    85.6    89.3
       Preferred stock dividends           13.0    13.0    13.6    17.4    20.8
       Amortization of debt expense
         and discounts                      1.1     0.8     0.5     0.3     0.3
       A portion of rental expense
         (1/3)                             58.5    57.7    43.7    39.6    30.0
                                        ---------------------------------------

     Subtotal (A)                         193.9   191.9   257.4   237.6   215.4
                                        ---------------------------------------


Divided by:


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                         76.1    87.4    81.5    73.7    79.4
  Preferred stock dividends                13.0    13.0    13.6    17.4    20.8
  A portion of rental expense (1/3)        58.5    57.7    43.7    39.6    30.0
  Interest capitalized during the
    period                                  2.0     2.5     1.4     0.9     2.2
  Amortization of debt expense
    and discounts                           1.1     0.8     0.5     0.3     0.3
                                        ----------------------------------------

     Subtotal (B)                       $ 150.7   161.4   140.7   131.9   132.7
                                        ---------------------------------------

     Ratio of earnings to fixed
       charges (A)/(B)                     1.29    1.19    1.83    1.80    1.62
                                        =======================================
</TABLE>

         AMERCO believes that one-third of AMERCO's annual rental expense is a
reasonable approximation of the interest factor of such rentals.
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 116 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1625, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following correction: Amend the long title so as to read: 
2 

•HCON 116 EH 

1 ‘‘Making appropriations for the fiscal year ending Sep2 tember 30, 2018, and for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 22, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 116 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 

1625.
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 102 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO 

4 CELEBRATE 200TH ANNIVERSARY OF BIRTH 

5 OF FREDERICK DOUGLASS. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

7 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on Feb-
2 

•HCON 102 EH 

1 ruary 14, 2018, for an event to celebrate the 200th anni2 versary of the birth of Frederick Douglass. 

3 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

4 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 

5 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

6 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 102 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the 

Douglass. the 200th anniversary of the birth of Frederick Capitol Visitor Center for an event to celebrate
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Matthew B. Smith, state and attest that:



|1. | I am the President of Main Place Funding, LLC (the Registrant).
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) containing financial statements fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented.



|                    
|--------------------
|/s/ Matthew B. Smith
|Matthew B. Smith    
|President           
|November 13, 2008   



20
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1
       
<CAPTION>
Exhibit 27: Financial Data Schedule
<S>									<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>						6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>					DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>						JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>						JUN-30-1997
<CASH>								16,565,816
<SECURITIES>						0
<RECEIVABLES>						14,250,668
<ALLOWANCES>						0
<INVENTORY>							568,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>					32,262,636
<PP&E>								675,632,960
<DEPRECIATION>						27,955,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>						742,666,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>				21,261,852
<BONDS>								616,365,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>				0
<PREFERRED>							0
<COMMON>							0
<OTHER-SE>							0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>		742,666,764
<SALES>								76,001,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>					76,001,113
<CGS>								33,221,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>						38,016,743
<Other-Costs>						4,795,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>					0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>					29,168,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>						10,097,103
<INCOME-TAX>						0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>					10,097,103
<DISCONTINUED>						0
<EXTRAORDINARY>						0
<CHANGES>							0
<NET-INCOME>						10,097,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>						0
<EPS-DILUTED>						0
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.6


                 AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL LETTER AGREEMENT

     This Amendment to Change of Control Letter Agreement, dated as of May 11,
2002 (this "Amendment"), by and between Polymer Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and James G. Boyd ("Executive") amends that certain
letter agreement, dated May 22, 1998, between the Company and Executive (the
"Original Agreement"). Except as otherwise indicated herein, capitalized terms
used herein are defined in the Original Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto herby agree as follows:

1.   AMENDMENT TO ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. The Original Agreement is hereby amended
     to add thereto Section 8.5 as follows:

     8.5  If it is determined that any payments hereunder, either separately or
          in conjunction with any other payments, benefits and entitlements
          received by Executive hereunder, would constitute an "excess parachute
          payment" within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
          Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and thereby be subject to the
          excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (the "Excise Tax"),
          then in such event, PGI shall be obligated to pay to Executive
          promptly following such determination and upon notice thereof a
          "gross-up" payment in an amount equal to the amount of such Excise
          Tax, plus all federal and state income or other taxes with respect to
          the payment of the amount of such Excise Tax, including all such taxes
          (including any additional Excise Tax) with respect to any such
          gross-up payment.

2.   CONTINUING EFFECT OF ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. Except as expressly amended
     hereby, all of the provisions of the Original Agreement are ratified and
     confirmed and remain in full force and effect.

3.   GOVERNING LAW. All issues and questions concerning the construction,
     validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Amendment shall be
     governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of
     South Carolina, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of
     law rules or provisions (whether of the State of South Carolina or any
     other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any
     jurisdiction other than the State of South Carolina.

4.   COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in two or more
     counterparts (including by means of telecopied signature pages), any one of
     which need not contain the signatures of more than one party, but all such
     counterparts taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

Dated this 11th day of May, 2002.


POLYMER GROUP, INC.

By:___________________________                     _____________________________
Name: ________________________                     James G. Boyd
Its: _________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FOR JUNO ACQUISITIONS, INC.
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          81,398
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,398
<PP&E>                                             144
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,639
<BONDS>                                         28,938
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           814
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,959
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,942)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 178 (Monday, November 24, 2008)]
[House]
[Page S10779]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 154

WASHINGTON, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2008

No. 178
```
#### Cowper *v.*Edwards. Adm’r. of Webb.

Action of debt against Defendant, naming him executor. Plea in abatement, that be is administrator and not ex'cutor. Plaintiff moved to amend upon the act of 1790, and cited *Strange*890, where after issue joined, the court permitted an amendment, by laying the as-sumpsit to be made to the Plaintiffs themselves, instead of its being made to their testator: but the Court said, the act. of i 790, is but a repetition of the provisions before made by the acts of amendment and jeofail, and that by this act nothing could be amended, but what the other party might have demurred to, and specially set down as the cause of his demurrer, which was not the case in the present instance. The amendment of writs, to mak® *27that maintainable which before the amendment was not so, might be productive of great hardship; for very possibly the reason of the bail entering into a bail bond, was his knowledge that'the action on the defective writ could not be supported, and then the amendment would entrap him : so the motion was denied.

Note. — Our Judges have expounded the act of 1790 with great liberality saying, "any tiling may be amended at any time.” Vide *McClure*v *Burton and others, 1 Car. Law Rep.*472. *Davis and another*v *Evans,*Ibid. 499. *Williams v. Lee’s Heirs, N. C. Term Rep.*146 *Justices of Camden*v. *Sawyer, 2 Hawks,*61. *Boyt v. Cooper, 2 Murph.*286. *Wilcox & Co.*v. *Hawkins,*3 *Hawks,*84.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 193 (Friday, January 2, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S10985]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Byrd).
  The legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                  Washington, DC, January 2, 2009.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, section 3, of the Standing 
     Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable Jeff 
     Bingaman, a Senator from the State of New Mexico, to perform 
     the duties of the Chair.
                                                   Robert C. Byrd,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. BINGAMAN thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
         Officer of VOXEL pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
         of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VOXEL (the "Company")
for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael
Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of VOXEL, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 17, 2008

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      -----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      -----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Financial Officer
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket No. 20-0232

US CEILING CORP.,

Respondent.

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief whether the judge, in affirming the two violations at issue 

in this case, erred in finding the Secretary failed to establish the violations were serious and 

recharacterizing them as other-than-serious. See 29 U.S.C. § 666(k).

The parties are advised that when a case is directed to consider either the merits or 

characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the penalty amount if they so choose.

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1

 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission 

in accordance with Commission Rule 93. The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed 

in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: October 5, 2022 /s/

John X. Cerveny

Executive Secretary

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, 

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. 

Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1
       
<CAPTION>
Exhibit 27: Financial Data Schedule
<S>									<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>						6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>					DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>						JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>						JUN-30-1998
<CASH>								4,937,128
<SECURITIES>						0
<RECEIVABLES>						14,531,305
<ALLOWANCES>						0
<INVENTORY>							956,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>					21,338,792
<PP&E>								661,494,471
<DEPRECIATION>						42,918,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>						716,655,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>				24,413,312
<BONDS>								606,382,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>				0
<PREFERRED>							0
<COMMON>							0
<OTHER-SE>							0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>		716,655,414
<SALES>								78,610,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>					78,610,056
<CGS>								34,301,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>						39,068,761
<Other-Costs>						4,766,904
<LOSS-PROVISION>					0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>					29,604,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>						11,194,876
<INCOME-TAX>						0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>					11,194,876
<DISCONTINUED>						0
<EXTRAORDINARY>						0
<CHANGES>							0
<NET-INCOME>						11,194,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>						0
<EPS-DILUTED>						0
        

</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 4, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-2989

Lower Tribunal No. 02-15545C

________________

Ernest M. Flowers,

Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction -- Habeas Corpus.

Ernest M. Flowers, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for respondent.

Before LAGOA, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

This Court issued an opinion on July 8, 2015 denying Ernest M. Flowers’

amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Flowers v. State, 2015 WL

4111336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). The opinion contained an order directing Flowers to
show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se

pleadings in this Court concerning his conviction and sentence imposed in case

number F02-015545C. Flowers’ response to the show cause order offers no new

argument, information, or other basis to persuade this Court to allow him to

continue filing further pro se documents in this Court. This Court thus concludes

that Flowers has not demonstrated good cause to justify further filings of appeals,

petitions, motions, and other pleadings in this Court. 

Therefore, the Clerk of the Court of the Third District Court of Appeal shall

refuse to accept further pro se filings related to case number F02-015545C, unless

such filings have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a licensed

member of the Florida Bar in good standing. Any such further and unauthorized

pro se filings by Flowers will subject him to sanctions, including the issuance of

written findings forwarded to the Florida Department of Corrections for

consideration by it for disciplinary action, pursuant to section 944.279(1), Florida

Statutes (2004). 

Order issued.

2
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 10, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-0520 Lower Tribunal No. F11-8943

________________ John Aaron Jackson, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Dava J. Tunis, Judge. Loren D. Rhoton (Tampa), for appellant.Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy CharestTurken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before HENDON, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.