88964 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination and 

Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain HotRolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India and 

Indonesia, 66 FR 60198 (December 3, 2001) 

(Orders). 2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 89 

FR 54435 (July 1, 2024). 3See Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of 

Intent to Participate in Sunset Reviews,’’ dated July 

15, 2024. 

4See Nucor Corporation’s Letters, ‘‘Hot-Rolled 

Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Notice of 

Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated July 

15, 2024; and ‘‘Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from Indonesia: Notice of Intent to 

Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated July 15, 2024. 5See United States Steel Corporation’s Letter, 

‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated July 16, 

2024. 6See Steel Dynamics, Inc. and SSAB Enterprises, 

LLC’s Letters, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from India: Notice of Intent to 

Participate,’’ dated July 16, 2024; and ‘‘Certain HotRolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Indonesia: 

Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated July 16, 2024. 

7See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, 

‘‘Domestic Industry Substantive Response,’’ dated 

July 31, 2024. 

8 8 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews for 

July 2024,’’ dated August 21, 2024. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Fourth Sunset Reviews of the Countervailing Duty 

Orders on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from India and Indonesia,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and adopted by, this notice. 

Comment 11: Whether Income Tax 

Reductions under Article 28 of the 

Enterprise Income Tax is Specific 

Comment 12: Whether It is Appropriate to 

Consider Other Subsidies 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–26175 Filed 11–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–821, C–560–813] 

Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 

Products From India and Indonesia: 

Final Results of the Expedited Fourth 

Sunset Reviews of the Countervailing 

Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

(CVD) orders on certain hot-rolled 

carbon steel flat products (hot-rolled 

steel) from India and Indonesia would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of countervailable subsidies 

at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of the Sunset Reviews’’ section 

of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable November 12, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0189. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 3, 2001, Commerce 

published the Orders on hot-rolled steel 

from India and Indonesia.1 On July 1, 

2024, Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the fourth five-year (sunset) 

reviews of the Orders, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act).2 From July 15 

through July 16, 2024, Commerce 

received notices of intent to participate 

from Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.,3 Nucor 

Corporation,4 United States Steel 

Corporation,5 Steel Dynamics, Inc., and 

SSAB Enterprises, LLC6 (collectively, 

the domestic interested parties), within 

the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i). Each of the domestic 

interested parties claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(v) as 

producers of the domestic like product. 

On July 31, 2024, Commerce received 

adequate substantive responses from the 

domestic interested parties within the 

30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).7 Commerce did not 

receive a substantive response from any 

other interested party to this 

proceeding. On August 21, 2024, 

Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that it 

did not receive an adequate substantive 

response from respondent interested 

parties.8 As a result, Commerce 

conducted expedited (120-day) sunset 

reviews of the Orders, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2). 

On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled 

certain deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.9 The 

deadline for these final results is now 

November 5, 2024. 

Scope of the Orders 

The merchandise covered by the 

Orders is certain hot-rolled carbon steel 

flat products from India and Indonesia. 

For a complete description of the scope 

of the Orders, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.10

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in these sunset reviews, 

including the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of subsidization in the 

event of revocation of the Orders and 

the countervailable subsidy rates likely 

to prevail if the Orders were to be 

revoked, is provided in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

topics discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS), which is available to 

registered users at https://access.

trade.gov. In addition, complete 

versions of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Reviews 

Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) 

of the Act, Commerce determines that 

revocation of the CVD orders on hotrolled steel from India would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

a countervailable subsidies at the 

following net countervailable subsidy 

rates: 

Producers/exporters 

Net countervailable 

subsidy rate 

(percent ad valorem) 

Essar Steel Limited .............................................................................................................................................................. 336.62 

Ispat Industries Limited ........................................................................................................................................................ 360.23 

Steel Authority of India Limited ........................................................................................................................................... 346.61 

Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited ................................................................................................................................ 337.51 

All Others ............................................................................................................................................................................. 344.44 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices 88965 

1See Laminated Woven Sacks from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 78 

FR 39256 (August 7, 2008) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 89 

FR 54335 (July 1, 2024). 

3The Laminated Woven Sacks Fair Trade 

Coalition consists of Polytex Fibers LLC and 

ProAmpac Holdings Inc. 

4See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Third 

Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Countervailing 

Duty Order on Laminated Woven Sacks from the 

People’s Republic of China: Domestic Interested 

Parties Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated July 

12, 2024. 

5See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Third 

Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Countervailing 

Duty Order on Laminated Woven Sacks from the 

People’s Republic of China: Domestic Interested 

Parties Substantive Response,’’ dated July 31, 2024. 

6See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews for 

July 2024,’’ dated August 21, 2024. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on 

Laminated Woven Sacks from China,’’ dated 

concurrently with and adopted by this notice 

(Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) 

of the Act, Commerce determines that 

revocation of the CVD order on hotrolled steel from Indonesia would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable 

subsidies at the following net 

countervailable subsidy rates: 

Producers/exporters 

Net countervailable 

subsidy rate 

(percent ad valorem) 

P.T. Krakatau Steel ............................................................................................................................................................. 10.21 

All Others ............................................................................................................................................................................. 10.21 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218. 

Dated: November 5, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Orders 

IV. History of the Orders 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates 

Likely to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–26120 Filed 11–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–917] 

Laminated Woven Sacks From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Third Expedited Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

(CVD) order on laminated woven sacks 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of the 

Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable November 12, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5255. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 7, 2008, Commerce 

published the order on laminated 

woven sacks from China.1 On July 1, 

2024, Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the third sunset review of 

the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 On July 12, 2024, Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

from the Laminated Woven Sacks Fair 

Trade Coalition 3 (the domestic 

interested party), within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).4

The domestic interested party claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(29) as U.S. manufacturers of 

laminated woven sacks. 

On July 31, 2024, Commerce received 

an adequate substantive response from 

the domestic interested party within the 

30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).5 Commerce did not 

receive a substantive response from any 

government or respondent interested 

party to this proceeding. On August 21, 

2024, Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that it 

did not receive an adequate substantive 

response from respondent interested 

parties.6 As a result, Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

Order is laminated woven sacks. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of subsidization in the event 

of revocation of the Order and the 

countervailable subsidy rates likely to 

prevail if the Order were to be revoked, 

is provided in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the topics 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES