alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MEDIRISK, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1998 AND THE MEDIRISK, INC. CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,280
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                       209
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,505
<PP&E>                                           3,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,587
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,291
<SALES>                                          5,176
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,176
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,626)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,626)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.03)
        

</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00323

- CV

George Travis Cervenka Jr. v. Karen Marie Cervenka

On Appeal from the 25th District Court of Lavaca County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- 01

- 24886CV

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified in part and reversed in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIF I ED IN PART and
REVERSED IN PART, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 50% against appellant and against

a ppell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 13 , 2023
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10702]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               ACT DECISIVELY AND IN A BIPARTISAN FASHION

  (Mr. PALLONE asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. PALLONE. Madam Speaker, today the House must act decisively and 
in a bipartisan fashion to begin the process of rescuing an economy 
that has been spiraling downward for some time. Without action, we are 
warned the credit markets will freeze up, preventing families from 
getting car and home loans, students from qualifying for college loans, 
and small businesses from being able to pay their employees or purchase 
new products.
  Over the last couple of days, we have heard that traffic in 
automobile dealerships is down 50 percent in the last month because 
people can't get the credit to purchase a new car. We have heard about 
college students not being able to pay for their classes or their books 
because they can't get the loan to attend school.
  If we don't act today, credit markets will freeze and Main Street 
will suffer. Families living from paycheck to paycheck will see their 
credit card limits slashed and interest rates increased. This is 
something we simply can't allow to happen. I hope that we can come 
together in strong bipartisan fashion to pass this economic rescue 
package today.

                          ____________________
```
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for May 2018

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 23

2. Cases Added to Docket 2

Shelly & Sands, Inc.

No. 17-0190

Direction for Review on May 2, 2018

Caldwell Tanks, Inc.

No. 16-1029

Direction for Review on May 10, 2018

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket 0

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 25
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

__________________________________________

SECRETARY OF LABOR, :

:

Complainant, :

:

v. : OSHRC Docket No. 11-2395

:

KIEWIT POWER CONSTRUCTORS CO., :

:

Respondent. :

__________________________________________:

ORDER AND NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT

Respondent has filed a Motion for Oral Argument in OSHRC Docket Number 11-2395, 

which was opposed by Complainant. The Commission grants Respondent’s Motion. Oral 

argument will be held on January 11, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. in the hearing room at the Review 

Commission’s Washington, D.C. headquarters listed above. 

Oral argument will be conducted in accordance with Commission Rule 95, 29 C.F.R. 

§ 2200.95. Each party will have 30 minutes to present its argument. Respondent will argue first, 

and may allocate a portion of its time for argument to its amicus curiae. Each party may reserve 

up to ten minutes of its time for rebuttal, and must so advise the Commission no later than 

December 21, 2017. The issues to be heard are those that were stated in the briefing notice.

Persons requiring special accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act 

shall submit their requests in writing to the Executive Secretary no later than three (3) working 

days in advance of the above scheduled date for oral argument to allow time for the request to be 

handled in an appropriate manner.
2

Any motion for postponement should be submitted immediately upon receipt of this 

notice. Counsel should be aware, however, that the Commission looks with disfavor upon such a 

motion, and it will not be routinely granted.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: November 8, 2017 /s/ John X. Cerveny

John X. Cerveny

Executive Secretary
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket No. 08-1386

DELEK REFINING, LTD., 

Respondent.

ORDER AND SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING NOTICE

On April 16, 2012, after briefing in this case had been completed, Respondent submitted 

a letter advising the Commission of a recent decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 

D.C. Circuit. In the letter, Respondent asserts that the decision, AKM LLC v. OSHRC, 675 F.3d 

752 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (“Volks”), requires dismissal of two citation items at issue on review. The 

Secretary filed an Opposition to Respondent’s letter and moved in the alternative that she be 

permitted to file a supplemental brief addressing the issues discussed in the letter. Respondent 

subsequently filed a Response to the Secretary’s Opposition. 

The Commission sets aside these filings and requests that the parties file supplemental 

briefs addressing what effect, if any, the court’s decision in Volks has on this case.

1

 All briefs 

are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93, 29 C.F.R. § 2200.93, except that the 

supplemental briefs shall not exceed 15 pages in length and any reply brief shall not exceed 10 

pages in length.2 The first supplemental brief is to be filed by Respondent within 40 days of this 

 

1

The parties are to limit their supplemental briefing to the issue specified in this Notice and not 

repeat arguments that have been previously presented in briefs filed with the Commission. 

2

The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 
2

notice. A party that does not intend to file a brief must notify the Commission in writing setting 

forth the reason therefor within the time for filing briefs, and shall serve a copy of the notice on 

all parties.

SO ORDERED.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: May 29, 2012 _/s/__________________________

Ray H. Darling, Jr.

Executive Secretary

 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles, and legal treatises be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 1:53 PM To: Hutson, Nick; Harvey, Reid; Culligan, Kevin Cc: Frey, Nathan J.; Grossman, Andrea Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 1 3563 -- 111(b) Modifications Data Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866_EO135 63_111bModData.docx

Attached please find a summary of interagency comme nts under EO 12866 and 13563 providing a table of h istorical EGU modifications for EPA’s consideration in relation t o the development of EPA draft final rule, Standard s of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, an d Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utilit y Generating Units.

Thanks and please let me know if you have any quest ions.

Aaron L. Szabo Policy Analyst Office of Management and Budget 202-395-3621 Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
 

Commission Monthly Case Activity for December 2011
 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 38 

2. Cases Added to Docket 2 

Custom Built Marine Construction, Inc.
 

No. 11-0977
 

Direction for Review on 12/13/11
 

Spirit Aero Systems, Inc.
 

No. 10-1697
 

Direction for Review on 12/14/11
 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket -1 

Barnhart, Inc.
 

No. 10-0108
 

Final Order on 12/6/11
 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 39
#### State, Plaintiff, vs. Surdick, Defendant.

*January 19*

February *12, 1924.*

*Criminal law: Trial: Submission of doubtful questions of law to supreme court.*

Under sec. 4721, Stats., the submission to this court of doubtful questions of law arising on the’trial of a criminal action must be made before sentence, p. 107.

Reported from the municipal court of Milwaukee county: A. C. Backus, Judge. *Questions not answered.*

On behalf of the *State*there was a brief by-the *Attorney General, George A. Sha-ughnessy,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, and *Eugene Wengert,*assistant district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Wengert*and *Mr. Robert M. Rieser,*deputy attorney general.

*107Doerfler, J.

Under the provisions of sec. 4721 of the Statutes there are certified to this court two questions of law for our determination. The defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of forgery and of uttering forged paper, and was sentenced to imprisonment for the period of three years, and is now serving his sentence.

The report of the learned municipal judge having been made after sentence, under the authority of *State v. Sheppard,*37 Wis. 395, we must hold that we have no authority to determine the questions submitted to us. When the *Sheppard Case*was decided sec. 4721 was known as sec. 8 of ch. 180 of the Statutes of 1871, which were then in force, and the statute as it then existed, in its wording was identical with the present statute. Sec. 4721 is not intended to take the place of a writ of error, and in order to comply with such section such questions should have been submitted before sentence.

We therefore cannot comply with the request of the learned municipal judge.
**Exhibit 32.1.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert B. Barnhill, Jr., ChiefExecutive Officer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

# 1.             The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 28,2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

#  

# 2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

#  

#  

| Date:  February 11,  2009 | /s/ Robert B.  Barnhill, Jr. |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                     | Robert B.  Barnhill, Jr.     |

##  

##  

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for November 2022

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 18

2. Cases Added to Docket 2

U.S. Postal Service – Canovanas Post Office

21-0794

Direction for Review on November 16, 2022

Walmart, Inc.

17-0949

Mandate from Second Circuit issued November 28, 2022

3. Cases Subtracted from Docket 0

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 20
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 549 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 549

 Expressing a commitment by the Senate to never forget the service of 
                      aviation's first responders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 2016

 Mr. Markey (for himself, Ms. Warren, Mr. Casey, Mrs. Gillibrand, and 
 Mr. Booker) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing a commitment by the Senate to never forget the service of 
                      aviation's first responders.

Whereas the events of September 11, 2001, forever changed the United States as 
        the people of the United States faced unspeakable destruction and grief 
        that touched millions of lives;
Whereas 4 commercial aircraft were turned into weapons of mass destruction, 
        killing nearly 3,000 innocent people at the World Trade Center, the 
        Pentagon, and in Shanksville, Pennsylvania;
Whereas the crewmembers of United Flight 175, American Flight 11, American 
        Flight 77, and United Flight 93 acted as first responders, providing the 
        first information about the unfolding attacks and selflessly protecting 
        the United States and the lives of countless others;
Whereas ever since 9/11, pilots and flight attendants in the United States 
        report to work with heightened responsibilities as first responders and 
        as the last line of defense in aviation security; and
Whereas the bravery of the crewmembers 15 years ago and our crewmember heroes 
        are prominent in the hearts and minds of the people of the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) forever memorializes the service of aviation's first 
        responders on that fateful day; and
            (2) will always seek to honor the sacrifice of aviation's 
        first responders, who continue to keep the United States safe 
        today.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AMERCO (the Registrant) on Form
10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Shoen,
Chairman of the Board and President of the Registrant certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.

| |  |                              |  |                                                                           
| |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | AMERCO,
a Nevada corporation
| |  |                              |  |                                                                           
| |  | By:
 
Title:
 
Date:         |  | /s/ Edward J. Shoen
Chairman of the Board and President 
 
August 22, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2362]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                TRIBUTE TO SPECIAL AGENT SCOTT E. JACOBS

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JIM SAXTON

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. SAXTON. Madam Speaker, I rise today in recognition of Special 
Agent Scott E. Jacobs, who will be retiring from the Naval Criminal 
Investigative Service (NCIS) after 28 years of dedicated service.
  Throughout his expansive career, Scott has been instrumental in the 
successful implementation of many operations within NCIS. When he first 
began his career in 1981, Scott was assigned to the Naval Investigative 
Service, NIS, in Seattle, Washington. After his initial post, he took 
on an undercover bidding operation in Yokosuka, Japan when he 
transferred to the NIS Resident Office. He then returned to the United 
States, where his keen operational style garnered Scott positions 
within management ranks, such as staff assistant to the regional 
director, Far East region, 1997-1988; special agent in charge of the 
Regional Fraud Office in New Jersey, 1988-1992; and assistant special 
agent in charge of the Metropolitan Northeast Field Office in New 
Jersey, 1992-1995.
  I came to know Scott during his time as a Department of the Navy 
legislative fellow. For 2 years, he worked with my staff as a Navy 
fellow and helped to ensure the people of New Jersey's third district 
were well-represented. Following a stint as executive assistant to the 
deputy director and deputy assistant director for economic crimes, 
1996-1997, he returned to Capitol Hill to work with the Joint Economic 
Committee. There, he focused his efforts on the Endangered Species Act. 
Scott then returned to NCIS headquarters and resumed his position as 
deputy assistant director for economic crimes.
  In 2001, Scott spent time in Seattle as a special agent-in-charge of 
the NCIS Northwest Field Office and spearheaded the NCIS Law 
Enforcement Information Exchange (LInX). This valuable data-sharing 
system has become one of the Nation's premier tools for law enforcement 
agencies. He later returned to our Nation's Capitol in 2005 upon his 
appointment to the Senior Executive Service as the executive assistant 
director for combating terrorism. Scott was also tapped to serve as the 
acting director of the Department of Defense Counterintelligence Field 
Activity (CIFA), where he managed the CIFA's transition to the Defense 
Intelligence Agency.
  Madam Speaker, Scott's enthusiasm and abiding loyalty for the NCIS 
are only surpassed by his genuine desire to embrace and enhance the 
world around him. As he celebrates his retirement, I would like to 
extend my sincere gratitude for his leadership, commitment, and service 
to our Nation.

                          ____________________
```
#### In re Condemnation of Lands: Baerwolf and wife, Appellants, vs. Wisconsin River Power Company and another, Respondents.

*January 8*

February *5, 1929.*

For the appellants there was a brief by *Grady, Farns-worth & Walker*of Portage, and oral argument by *W. H. Farnsworth.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Schubring, Ryan, Clarke & Petersen*of Madison, and oral argument by *William Ryan.*

Crownhart, J.

This case presents substantially the same questions presented in *Application of Gehrke,*176 Wis. 452, 186 N. W. 1020. The main question is whether the evidence produced before the county judge was of such probative force as to warrant this court in reversing his finding of fact. The finding by the county judge is: “I do not find, from the evidence, that it can be reasonably held there has *113been such taking,” referring to a taking of the lands involved.

The appellants’ petition alleged facts bringing them within sec. 32.15 of the Statutes, giving the owners of land a right to condemn pursuant to ch. 32 of the Statutes, when a person having the right to condemn takes possession of lands without condemnation. By sec. 32.04 it is provided:

> “If any owner of property desires to institute condemnation proceedings, he shall present his verified petition therefor to the county or circuit judge of the county where the land is situated. Such petition shall describe the land, state the board, commission or corporation against which the condemnation proceedings are instituted, and use to which it has been put or is designed to have been put by the board, commission or corporation against which the proceedings are instituted.”

Manifestly, the petitioner must make proof of the facts alleged before the county court is required to proceed. The county court then had to find as a fact in this case that the respondents had taken possession of the petitioners’ land. The county court found the evidence insufficient to determine such to be the fact. Until there was such a taking the petitioners were not entitled to institute condemnation proceedings. That is the effect of the decision in *Application of Gehrke, supra.*

It will serve no useful purpose to review the large amount of evidence in the proceeding. The burden was upon the petitioners to establish a taking of the lands by the respondents, by reason of the raising cf the dam in 1919. As in the *Gehrke Case, supra,*we are unable to say, with any degree of certainty, that there was such a taking; hence the decision of the court must stand.

*By the Court.*— The order and judgment of the county court are affirmed.