### 1415 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Notices

4 Availability of funds for the i3 program in FY 2011 and in subsequent years is contingent upon an appropriation of funds for the program by the Congress. the maximum possible points assigned to each criterion.

Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in which we choose to use these priorities, requirements, and selection criteria, we invite applications through a notice in the Federal Register. 4

Executive Order 12866: Under Executive Order 12866, the Secretary must determine whether a regulatory action is ‘‘ significant’’ and therefore subject to the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a ‘‘ significant regulatory action’’ as an action likely to result in a rule that may (1) have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local or Tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to as an ‘‘ economically significant’’ rule); (2) create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, or local programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive order. The Secretary has determined that this regulatory action is not significant under section 3(f) of the Executive order.

This notice has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have assessed the potential costs and benefits of this proposed regulatory action.

The potential costs associated with this proposed regulatory action are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as necessary for administering the Department’s discretionary grant programs effectively and efficiently.

In assessing the potential costs and benefits—both quantitative and qualitative—of this proposed regulatory action, we have determined that the benefits of the proposed priorities and definitions justify the costs.

We have determined, also, that this proposed regulatory action does not unduly interfere with State, local, and Tribal governments in the exercise of their governmental functions. Summary of Potential Costs and Benefits

This proposed regulatory action affects only LEAs and nonprofit organizations that are applying for assistance under the i3 program. This regulatory action creates flexibility for the Department to (a) select from among the priorities and selection criteria that were established in the 2010 NFP specific priorities and criteria to use in the FY 2011 i3 grant competition and those in subsequent years, and (b) select other selection criteria under 34 CFR 75.209 and 75.210. We believe that any priority or criterion that would be used in a future grant competition would not impose a financial burden that LEAs and nonprofit organizations would not otherwise incur in the development and submission of a grant application under the i3 program, and under some circumstances (for example, if the Department elected to use fewer criteria or factors in a given competition) the proposed changes could reduce the financial burden of preparing an i3 grant application by a modest amount.

Additionally, although the ‘‘Limits on Grant Awards ’’ and ‘‘ Cost Sharing or Matching’’ requirements are i3 program requirements, both requirements affect only the highest-rated applications from the peer review process that are also determined to be eligible for an i3 grant award. Therefore, we believe that the proposed modifications to the requirements would not impose a financial burden that LEAs and nonprofit organizations would not otherwise incur in the development and submission of a grant application under the i3 program.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

This notice contains information collection requirements that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520). The burden associated with CFDA Nos. 84.396A/B/C was approved by OMB under OMB Control Number 1855–0021, which expires on October 31, 2013. These proposed revisions to priorities, requirements, and selection criteria would allow the Department to improve the design of the i3 program to better achieve its purposes and goals by (a) establishing the flexibility to select priorities and selection criteria and (b) modifying the ‘‘Limits on Grant Awards ’’ and ‘‘ Cost Sharing or Matching’’ requirements. However, the revisions do not change the number of applications an organization may submit or the burden that an applicant would otherwise incur in the development and submission of a grant application under the i3 program. Therefore, the Department expects that this proposed regulatory action will not affect the total burden of 150,000 hours.

Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance.

This document provides early notification of our specific plans and actions for this program.

Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document in an accessible format ( e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed under **FOR FURTHER**
**INFORMATION CONTACT**

.

Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ fedregister. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1– 888–293–6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512–1530.

Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ index.html.

Dated: January 5, 2011. James H. Shelton, III, Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.

[FR Doc. 2011–269 Filed 1–7–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4000–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge**  **Reservation**

**AGENCY :**  Department of Energy.

**ACTION :**  Notice of cancellation of open meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces the cancellation of the January 12, 2011,


### 1416 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Notices

meeting of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting cancellation be announced in the Federal Register . The next regular meeting will be held on February 9,

2011.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Patricia J. Halsey, Federal Coordinator, Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM– 90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576–4025; Fax (865) 576–2347 or e-mail: halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ ssab

.

Issued at Washington, DC, on January 6,

2011. LaTanya R. Butler, Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–339 Filed 1–6–11; 4:15 pm]

**BILLING CODE 6405–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**Federal Energy Regulatory Commission** 

**[Project No. 6552–021]**

**HDI Associates V; Sprague Hydro LLC; Notice of Application for Transfer of**  **License, and Soliciting Comments and Motions To Intervene** 

December 29, 2010.

On December 10, 2010, HDI Associates V (transferor) and Sprague Hydro LLC (transferee) filed an application for transfer of license for the North Fork Sprague River Hydroelectric Project No. 6552, located on the North Fork Sprague River in Klamath County, Oregon.

Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for the North Fork Sprague River Hydroelectric Project from transferor to transferee.

Applicants’ Contact: Transferor: Craig Smith, Grayco, LLC, P.O. Box 566, Gresham, Oregon 97030, (503) 618–8717 ext. 105. For Transferee: Ted S. Sorenson, Sprague Hydro LLC, 5203 South 11th East, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404, (208) 522–8069.

FERC Contact: Jeremy M. Jessup, (202) 502–6779, Jeremy.Jessup@ferc.gov.

Deadline for filing comments and motions to intervene: 30 days from the issuance date of this notice. Comments and motions to intervene may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1) and the instructions on the Commission’s Web site under http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at http:// www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the end of your comments. If unable to be filedelectronically, documents may be paperfiled. To paper-file, an original plus seven copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. More information about this project can be viewed or printed on the eLibrary link of Commission’s Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P–6552) in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1–866–208–3372.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011–181 Filed 1–7–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6717–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**Federal Energy Regulatory Commission** 

**Combined Notice of Filings #1**

December 30, 2010.

Take notice that the Commission received the following electric corporate filings:

Docket Numbers: EC11–34–000. Applicants: White Oak Energy Holdings LLC.

Description: Application for Authorization for Disposition of Jurisdictional Facilities, Request for Confidential Treatment, and Request for Expedited Consideration of White Oak Energy Holdings LLC.

Filed Date: 12/30/2010. Accession Number: 20101230–5140. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, January 20, 2011.

Take notice that the Commission received the following electric rate filings:

Docket Numbers: ER93–3–000. Applicants: United Illuminating Company, The.

Description: Updated Market Power Analysis of The United Illuminating Company.

Filed Date: 12/30/2010. Accession Number: 20101230–5148. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER98–4159–019; ER04–268–017; ER06–398–014; ER06– 399–014; ER07–157–011; ER10–622–
004.

Applicants: Duquesne Light Company, Macquarie Energy LLC.

Description: Updated Market Power Analysis of the Duquesne Companies and Macquarie Energy LLC.

Filed Date: 12/30/2010. Accession Number: 20101230–5136. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER99–1522–006; ER02–723–005; ER04–359–004; ER06– 796–004; ER07–553–003; ER07–554– 003; ER07–555–003; ER07–556–003; ER07–557–003.

Applicants: Emera Energy Services Subsidiary No. 2 LLC, Emera Energy Services Subsidiary No. 3 LLC, Emera Energy Services Subsidiary No. 5 LLC, Emera Energy Services, Inc., Bangor Hydro Electric Company, Emera Energy U.S. Subsidiary No. 1, Inc., Emera Energy U.S. Subsidiary No. 2, Inc., Emera Energy Services Subsidiary No. 1 LLC, Emera Energy Services Subsidiary No. 4 LLC.

Description: Triennial Update of Bangor Hydro Electric Company, et al.

Filed Date: 12/29/2010. Accession Number: 20101229–5135. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, February 28, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER00–3621–013; ER01–468–012; ER02–23–016; ER04– 249–009; ER04–318–009; ER05–34–009; ER05–35–009; ER05–36–009; ER05–37– 009; ER07–1306–008; ER08–1323–004; ER96–2869–017; ER97–30–010; ER97– 3561–009; ER99–1695–018.

Applicants: Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.; Dominion Energy Marketing, Inc.; Fairless Energy, LLC; Dominion Retail, Inc.; Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.; Dominion Energy New England, Inc.; Dominion Energy Salem Harbor, LLC; Dominion Energy Brayton Point, LLC; Dominion Energy Manchester Street, Inc.; NedPower Mt. Storm, LLC; Fowler Ridge Wind Farm LLC; State Line Energy, LLC; Kincaid Generation, L.L.C.; Virginia Electric and Power Company; Elwood Energy, LLC.

Description: Dominion Resources Services, Inc. Supplement to Market Power Analyses.

Filed Date: 12/30/2010. Accession Number: 20101230–5102. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, January 20, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER00–2918–021; ER01–1654–024; ER02–2567–021; ER04–485–019; ER05–261–014; ER05– 556–002; ER05–728–014; ER08–537– 003; ER10–1443–002; ER10–2172–001; ER10–2174–001; ER10–2176–001; ER10–2178–001; ER10–2179–001; ER10–2180–001; ER10–2181–001;