alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2nd Amend. to the 3rd Amended & Restated Non-Emp. Director Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.4 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 

GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. 

THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED 

2000 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN 

This Second Amendment to the Global Payments Inc. Third Amended and Restated 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the
“Director Plan”), is hereby adopted this 24th day of July, 2007, by the Board of Directors of Global Payments Inc. (the “Company”). 

WHEREAS, the Company adopted the Director Plan for the purposes set forth therein; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 of the Director Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company has the right to amend the Director Plan
with respect to certain matters; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has approved and authorized this Amendment to the
Director Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Director Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof, in the following
particulars: 
 By deleting the first paragraph of Section 5(a) in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 “(a) Grant. Each person who becomes a Non-Employee Director shall be granted on the date that he or she first
becomes a Non-Employee Director an option to purchase that number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock having a value of $80,000 pursuant to the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of the grant (utilizing the same assumptions as
the Company utilizes for its proxy disclosure), multiplied by a fraction, the numerator or which is the number of full months before the next regularly scheduled annual shareholders meeting of the Company, and the denominator of which is 12. In
addition, as of the day following each annual meeting of the Company’s public shareholders, each Non-Employee Director serving as such on that date shall be granted an option to purchase that number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock
having a value of $80,000 pursuant to the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of the grant (utilizing the same assumptions as the Company utilizes for its proxy disclosure). Each such day that options are to be granted under the Plan is
referred to hereinafter as a “Grant Date.” ” 
 All other provisions of the Director Plan shall remain the same.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Global Payments Inc., by a duly authorized officer, has executed this Amendment to the Director Plan, as
of the 24th day of July, 2007. 
  

			
	GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Suellyn P. Tornay
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 643 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-294, K2025-292.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26574 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
consent.htm




 







Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141760) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 11, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 7, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities.







                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


 


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


October 27, 2010
# Official Journal L 257/1 Oc

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 257 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 481 October 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 257

English edition

Legislation

Volume 481 October 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1564/2005 of 7 September 2005 establishing standard forms for the publication of notices in the framework of public procurement procedures pursuant to Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005 amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement (1) | 127 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1564/2005 of 7 September 2005 establishing standard forms for the publication of notices in the framework of public procurement procedures pursuant to Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)

1

*

Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005 amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement (1)

127

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Pollack, Appellant, vs. Wilhelm, Respondent.

*April 7*

May *11, 1926.*

This case is ruled by *Mayfield Woolen Mills v. Goodrich & Martineau Co.*189 Wis. 406.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Wood county: Byron B. Park, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Fishy Marshuts & Hoffman',*attorneys, and *Irving A. Fish*and *F. C. John,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Fish.*

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *R. R. Williams*of Marshfield.

Doerfler, J.

This case is ruled by the opinion in the case of *Mayfield Woolen Mills v. Goodrich & Martineau Co.*189 Wis. 406, 207 N. W. 954.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the lower court is reversed, with directions for further proceedings in accordance with the *Mayfield Case, supra.*
NO. 07-01-0486-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

MAY 15, 2002

______________________________

EUSEBIO MARTINEZ, APPELLANT

V.

POTTER COUNTY, ET AL., APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 13,031-E; HONORABLE ABE LOPEZ, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

Samuel Brown Silverman appeals from the trial court’s order granting taxing entities

of Potter County excess proceeds from an order of sale in the amount of $5,059.45.

Presenting two issues, he contends (1) the trial court’s ex parte hearing denied him due

process resulting in reversible error because he was not given notice under Rule 21a of

the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure in a contested case where pleadings were properly

served and a hearing date was set; and (2) the trial court’s failure to respond to a timely
2

and proper request for findings of fact and conclusions of law is presumed harmful where

Potter County, et al. was awarded ex parte all of the excess proceeds. For the reasons

expressed herein, we reverse and remand.

In 1999, judgment was entered against Eusebio Martinez and Olga Martinez for

delinquent taxes on a parcel of real property and an order of sale for real property ensued

to satisfy the debt. An excess of $5,059.45 was deposited with the Potter County Clerk on

August 23, 1999 and a notice of excess funds was given to Martinez. Stonehenge FASA,

Texas JDC, L.P., the legal and equitable beneficiary of a deed of trust securing the

purchase-money lien of the property against which taxes were assessed, assigned its lien

to Silverman, who filed a petition to claim $3,014.07 of the excess proceeds. On August

28, 2001, the trial court ordered that Silverman recover $3,014.07 of the excess proceeds.

On September 4, 2001, the trial court set aside its August 28 order and granted a new

hearing on the ground that the taxing entities had not been given notice of the hearing.

Thereafter, Potter County filed a motion to release the entire amount of excess funds.

Without notice to Silverman, on September 10, 2001, the trial court ordered the excess

proceeds be released to the taxing entities of Potter County.

By its brief, Potter County candidly acknowledges and stipulates that the trial court’s

order of September 10, 2001 be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for

further proceedings on the ground that no reporter’s record of the hearing was made.
3

Agreeing with Potter County, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the

cause for further proceedings.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice

 

Do not publish.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Quarter Ended
                                                                   June 30, 1997
                                                                   -------------
<S>                                                                <C> 
Net Income                                                           $  38,261
                                                                      ========

Weighted average shares outstanding                                    231,041

Reduction for common shares not yet released by
  Employee Stock Ownership Plan                                         15,136

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
   effect of stock options                                                *
                                                                      --------

Total weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding for primary computation                      215,905
                                                                      ========

Primary earnings per share                                            $    .18
                                                                      ========

Total weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding for primary computation                      215,905

Additional dilutive shares using the end
  of period market value versus the average
  market value when applying the treasury
  stock method                                                            **
                                                                      --------

Total weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding for fully diluted
  computation                                                          215,905
                                                                      ========

Fully diluted earnings per share                                      $    .18
                                                                      ========

</TABLE> 
*    Note:  The fair value of the stock at June 30, 1997 was $10.00, the same as
            the stock option exercise price; therefore no common stock
            equivalents are computed.

**   Note:  If average share price is greater than ending price, use average
            price for both primary and fully diluted calculation. This
            adjustment does not apply because the average price and the ending
            price at June 30, 1997 were the same as the stock option exercise
            price of $10.00 per share.
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting including a Discussion on Ozone NAAQS 

 Proposal 

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Date: February 18, 2015

On February 8, 2015, Tom Powers, Senior Policy Advisor, Office of Air and Radiation fielded 

general questions concerning the Agency’s November 25, 2015, proposed revisions to the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone from members of the Local Government 

Advisory Committee (LGAC), Air, Climate & Energy Workgroup. 

There were no meeting materials. The meeting agenda is attached.

The attendees were as follows:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Kevin Culligan

Paul Gunning

Tom Powers

LGAC Workgroup Members

Commissioner Carolyn Peterson, Tompkins County, NY

Commissioner Robert Cope, Lemhi County, ID

Supervisor Salud Carbajal, Santa Barbara, CA

Mayor Elizabeth Kautz, Burnsville, MN

Mayor Pro Tem Cindy Circo, Kansas City, MO
EXHIBIT 32.2 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Express Credit Corporation (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David L.
Yowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                   |  |                         
|------------------ |  | ------------------------
|/s/David L.
 Yowan
|                  
|Name:              |  | David L.
 Yowan         
|Title:             |  | Chief
 Financial Officer
|Date:              |  | March 30,
 2009         

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except
to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated
by reference in any such filing.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Page 1 of 2

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on January 31, 2018

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 09-1901 Seward Ship’s 

Drydock, Inc. 11/14/11 DFR 11/21/11, 04/17/13 Closed

2 08-1774 Angelica Textile 

Services, Inc. 09/28/12 DFR 10/16/12 Closed

3 11-2395 Kiewit Power 

Constructors Co. 01/24/13 DFR 03/04/13 Closed

4 11-1734 Calpine 

Corporation 06/24/13 DFR 06/26/13 Closed

5 10-0637

BP Products North 

America, Inc., & 

BP-Husky 

Refining, LLC

09/16/13 DFR 11/01/13 Closed

6 12-1600 Envision Waste 

Services 02/10/14 DFR 02/24/1404/16/14 Closed

7 12-2142

Meadows 

Construction 

Company, LLC

06/05/14 DFR 06/24/14 Closed

8 12-1617 Houston 

Aquarium, Inc. 09/18/14 DFR 10/20/14 Closed

9 13-1022

Mid South 

Waffles, Inc., d/b/a 

Waffle House 

#1283

12/31/14 DFR 02/03/15 Closed

10 14-0948 Florida Gas 

Contractors, Inc. 01/15/15 DFR 02/06/15 Closed

11 12-1287 CSA Equipment 

Company, LLC 01/16/15 DFR 02/09/15 Closed

12 13-0224 A.H. Sturgill 

Roofing, Inc. 03/23/15 DFR 04/08/15 Closed

13 13-1817 Missouri Basin 

Well Service Inc. 04/23/15 DFR 05/07/15 Closed

14 14-0844 Quick Transport of 

Arkansas, LLC 07/01/15 DFR 07/28/15 Closed

15 13-1124 Integra Health 

Management, Inc. 07/21/15 DFR 09/18/15 Closed

16 13-0900 Suncor Energy 

(U.S.A.) Inc. 08/31/15 DFR 09/18/15 Closed

17 13-1169 North Eastern 

Precast LLC 10/29/15 DFR 11/02/15 Closed

18 13-1170 Masonry Services 

Inc. dba MSI 10/29/15 DFR 11/02/15 Closed

19 13-0644 Wynnewood 

Refining Co., LLC 03/03/16 DFR 03/18/16 Closed
Page 2 of 2

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on January 31, 2018

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

20 13-0791 Wynnewood 

Refining Co., LLC 03/03/16 DFR 03/18/16 Closed

21 14-1688

Science 

Applications 

International 

Corp., d/b/a SAIC

06/23/16 DFR 10/31/16 Closed

22 15-1121 Clean Fuels of 

Indiana, Inc. 06/30/16 DFR 11/09/16 Closed

23 14-1268

Dover High 

Performance 

Plastics

07/19/16 DFR 11/01/16 Closed

24 15-1347 Gate Precast 

Company 11/10/16 DFR 12/05/16 Closed

25 16-1533

Cooper/T. Smith 

Corporation, d/b/a 

Blakeley 

Boatworks, Inc.

04/27/17 DFR 04/27/17 Closed

26 16-0803

The Lane 

Construction 

Corporation

05/23/17 DFR 09/14/17 Open

27 16-1167 Aerospace Testing 

Alliance 08/22/17 DFR 11/20/17 Open

28 15-1069 Healy Tibbitts 

Builders, Inc. 10/27/17 DFR 11/13/17 Open

29 16-0940 Angel Brothers 

Enterprises, Ltd. 11/17/17 DFR 12/15/17 Open

30 17-0992

Coleman 

Hammons 

Construction Co., 

Inc.

01/25/18 DFR Open

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James L.Schaeffer, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Polymer Group, Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)                Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered in thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)                Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: May 17, 2004 |   | /s/ James L. Schaeffer                      |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | James L. Schaeffer  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----