alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 33 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to equal rights for men and women. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. BRENDAN F. 

BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. DANNY K. 

DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. HIGGINS of New 

York, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. CRIST, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. CLAY, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. DENT, 

Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. THOMPSON of 

Mississippi, Mr. MCEACHIN, Mr. KIND, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. 

JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. WALZ, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. 

JEFFRIES, Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. 

SCHIFF, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. REED, Mr. LANCE, Mr. HOYER, 

Mr. DELANEY, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. PALLONE, Mrs. DINGELL, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. NORCROSS, Ms. MENG, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, 

Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. LARSEN

of Washington, Mr. KEATING, Ms. ADAMS, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Ms. WILSON

of Florida, Ms. MATSUI, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Ms. BONAMICI, Ms. LEE, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. NORTON, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. 

SWALWELL of California, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. SIRES, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. POCAN, Ms. DEGETTE, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. 

MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mr. AGUILAR, Mr. 

CA ́RDENAS, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. BEYER, Mr. COOPER, and Mr. 

COHEN) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 33 IH 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to equal rights for men and women. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 

9 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

10 ‘‘SECTION 1. Women shall have equal rights in the 

11 United States and every place subject to its jurisdiction. 

12 Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or 

13 abridged by the United States or by any State on account 

14 of sex. 

15 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress and the several States shall 

16 have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the 

17 provisions of this article. 

18 ‘‘SECTION 3. This amendment shall take effect two 

19 years after the date of ratification.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 107 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.107
                                     Agreed to February 26, 2018        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING REVEREND BILLY GRAHAM TO LIE IN HONOR IN ROTUNDA 
              OF CAPITOL.

    (a) In General.--Reverend Billy Graham shall be permitted to lie in 
honor in the Rotunda of the Capitol from February 28, 2018, to March 1, 
2018.
    (b) Implementation.--The Architect of the Capitol, under the 
direction and supervision of the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, shall take 
the necessary steps to implement subsection (a).
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
## Decisions Search

Search Tips:

To find a decision by either case name or docket number, type the case name or docket number (##-####) into the box above and select search. You do not need to complete the other fields.

For a broader search, you may use the dropdown feature to select “All” or narrow your search by “Final ALJ Decisions” or “Final Commission Decisions.” You may also narrow your search by selecting a date range if you so choose. For this type of search, leave the case/docket number field empty.

 

 

**Please note that this search contains final Commission and unreviewed ALJ decisions, but only those unreviewed ALJ decisions that have become final orders of the Commission since 1993.  Some final orders of unreviewed ALJ decisions since 1993 are not included on this list (e.g., settlements and defaults). Since 1987, ALJ decisions that were reviewed by the Commission are appended to the end of the final Commission decision. Final Commission decisions dated 1993 or earlier have been reproduced following conversion from prior formats. Corrections have been made and noted to the extent possible where the original copy was unreadable or contained errors or omissions.
EXHIBIT 12.1AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORPORATIONCOMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(Dollars in millions)

|                                         |  | Years
    Ended December 31,
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                                         |  |                             
|Earnings:                                |  |                             
|Net income                               |  | $                           
|Income tax provision                     |  |                             
|Interest expense                         |  |                             
|Total earnings (a)                       |  | $                           
|                                         |  |                             
|Fixed charges - interest expense (b)     |  | $                           
|                                         |  |                             
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a/b) |  |                             

Interest expense does not include interest on liabilities recorded under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes  an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). Credcos policy is to classify such interest in the income tax provision in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

---
(/)

Valmont Generating Station

Valmont Station has two Xcel Energy operating units

Overview

Location: Boulder, Colo.

Plant Description: Valmont Station has two Xcel Energy operating units. Unit V5 is a coal-fired, steam-electric

generating unit that can also use natural gas as fuel. Unit V6 is a combustion turbine that uses natural gas as

fuel. Southwest Generation also owns and operates two 40 MW combustion turbines that are located on site.

Power Production Capabilities: 229 megawatts (MW): V5 – 186 MW and V6 – 43 MW

Fuel Source: Low-sulfur coal from western Colorado mines and natural gas.

Plant History

Interesting Features

Unit 5 uses three surrounding reservoirs for circulating cooling water. These reservoirs attract a variety of

wildlife, including an abundance of waterfowl. For decades the plant site has been recognized as a unique

wildlife refuge. Southwest Generation owns and operates two 40 MW natural gas-fired combustion turbines

and a 43 MW steam turbine at the site. Xcel Energy purchases Southwest Generation's electric output. From

January through early Valmont Station spring, great horned owls use a nest box located about 260’ up one of

the plant’s three stacks. We have installed a camera in the box so the public can watch nesting activities and

learn more about the owls on Xcel Energy’s Owl Cam, available at xcelenergy.com.

Environmental Highlights

Clean Air Clean Jobs Act

In spring of 2010, the Colorado Legislature passed the Clean Air-Clean Jobs Act, which Xcel Energy

supported. The legislation requires regulated utilities, like Xcel Energy, to work to reduce emissions from coalfired power plants. As a result, Valmont unit 5 will be shut down by 2017.

Technology helps reduce plant emissions. Air emissions are controlled on V5 with low-NOx burners that

reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. The plant also has a baghouse that acts like a giant vacuum cleaner,

removing particulate emissions from the flue gas by more than 99 percent. As part of Xcel Energy’s voluntary

emission reduction effort in the Denver metro area, a scrubber was installed to reduce sulfur dioxide

emissions.

Community Involvement

For more information contact:

Colorado Plant Information and Tour Request

1-800-895-4999
Colorado Media Inquiries

303-294-2300

loading
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 42 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted 

the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2017 

Ms. KAPTUR (for herself, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Ms. NORTON, Mr. SEAN

PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. HIGGINS of New 

York, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. SOTO, Mr. BLUMENAUER, 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, and Mr. RASKIN) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court 

misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution 

in the case of Buckley v. Valeo. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the Su3 preme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the 

4 Constitution in its decision in the 1976 case of Buckley 

5 v. Valeo because— 

6 (1) the decision failed to recognize that the un7 limited spending of large amounts of money on elec8 tions has a corrosive effect on the electoral process 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 42 IH 

1 not simply because of direct transactions between 

2 those who give large amounts of money and can3 didates and elected officials but because the presence 

4 of unlimited amounts of money corrupts the process 

5 on a more fundamental level; and 

6 (2) the decision failed to recognize other legiti7 mate State interests which justify limiting money in 

8 campaigns, including the need to preserve the integ9 rity of our republican form of government, restore 

10 public confidence in government, and ensure all citi11 zens a more equal opportunity to participate in the 

12 political process. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 32


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Mymetics Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: January 12, 2006             /s/ Christian Rochet
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: January 12, 2006             /s/ Ernst Luebke
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Principal financial and Chief Financial
                                    Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as a separate
disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Polymer Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended July 2,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Willis C. Moore, III, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 22, 2005 | /s/ WILLIS C. MOORE, III |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------|
| * *                   | Willis C.  Moore, III    |
| * *                   | *Chief  Financial Officer*    |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
Exhibit 32.1




C.E.O.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE
ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)








In
connection with the Annual Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





/s/
      Michael A. RichardsonMichael
      A. RichardsonChairman
      and Chief Executive OfficerAmerican
      Consumers, Inc.








Date:  August
29, 2008
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for December 2011
1.Cases Pending Beginning of Month 382.Cases Added to Docket 

Custom Built Marine Construction, Inc.
No. 11-0977
Direction for Review on 12/13/11

Spirit Aero Systems, Inc.
No. 10-1697
Direction for Review on 12/14/11

2
3.Cases Subtracted From Docket

Barnhart, Inc.
No. 10-0108
Final Order on 12/6/11

-1


4.Total Cases Pending End of Month39
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket No. 16-1029

CALDWELL TANKS, INC.,

Respondent.

BRIEFING NOTICE

The Commission requests the parties to address the following questions on review of the 

administrative law judge’s decision:

1. Does the cited provision of the welding standard (29 C.F.R. 

§ 1926.353(b)(1)) presume that a hazard exists “whenever welding, cutting, 

or heating is performed in a confined space”?

In briefing this issue, the parties are asked to address the meaning of the 

term “confined space” in the cited provision and whether the Secretary’s 

interpretation of the term is reasonable and entitled to deference. The 

parties should also specifically discuss how the meaning of “confined 

space,” as used in the cited provision, was affected, if at all, by OSHA’s 

later promulgation and revocation of 29 C.F.R § 1926.21(b)(6)(ii) and 

OSHA’s promulgation of the Confined Spaces in Construction standard

(Part 1926–Subpart AA). See 37 Fed. Reg. 3512, 3514 (February 17, 1972); 

80 Fed. Reg. 25366, 25518-19 (May 4, 2015). 

2. Did the Secretary provide sufficient notice of his interpretation of the cited 

provision?

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission on review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. Accordingly, 

the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.
2

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party that does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing briefs, 

and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of intent) 

of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: May 18, 2018 /s/

 John X. Cerveny

 Executive Secretary 

 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 97-1683

RAYMOND G. MAXSON, APPELLANT,

V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and HOLDAWAY and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

On July 6, 1999, the Court issued an opinion affirming the July 31, 1997, Board of Veterans'

Appeals (Board) decision that had determined that Mr. Maxson's partial colectomy, received prior

to active service, was not aggravated by his combat service and thus had denied his reopened claim

for VA service-connected benefits. See Maxson v. West, 12 Vet.App. 453 (1999). On July 28, 1999,

judgment was entered. On August 2, 1999, Mr. Maxson filed, through counsel, an appeal to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit). 

On October 27, 2000, the Federal Circuit affirmed this Court's July 1999 decision and

returned the matter to this Court. See Maxson v. Gober, 230 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2000). On

November 9, 2000, the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-475, 114 Stat.

2096 (Nov. 9, 2000) (VCAA), was enacted. In accordance with In Re: Veterans Claims Assistance

Act of 2000, 15 Vet.App. 27 (2001) (en banc order) (Misc. Order 4-00), the July 28, 1999, judgment

was recalled. Further, Misc. Order 4-00 invited the parties to provide memorandum of law on the

impact that the VCAA could have on Mr. Maxson's claim. The parties did not file any responses

pursuant to Misc. Order 4-00. On August 31, 2001, Misc. Order 4-00 was rescinded. See In Re:

Rescission of Misc. No. 4-00, In Re: Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, U.S. Vet. App. Misc.

Order No. 6-01 (Aug. 31, 2001) (en banc order).

Because neither party has argued the beneficiality of the VCAA in this case, the Court will

not address it and, accordingly, will enter judgment. See Tellex v. Principi, __ Vet.App. __, __, No.

98-1886 (Sept. 25, 2001); Williams v. Principi, __ Vet.App. __, No. 98-1491 (Aug. 31, 2001) (en

banc) (Court did not address applicability of VCAA to claim pending on appeal when VCAA

enacted). Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that judgment on the Court's July 6, 1999, opinion is entered. This order

constitutes the mandate of the Court.
2

DATED: October 10, 2001 PER CURIAM.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Pages S115-S116]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      By Mr. KERRY (for himself, Ms. Snowe, and Mrs. Lincoln):
  S. 138. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 
alternative minimum tax limitations on private activity bond interest, 
and for other purposes; to the Committee on Finance.
  Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, today Senator Snowe and I are introduce 
legislation to exempt private activity bond interest from the 
alternative minimum tax, AMT. My colleague from Massachusetts, 
Representative Richard Neal has introduced similar legislation. Under 
current law, interest paid on private activity bonds is subject to the 
alternative minimum tax. This results in the bonds not being very 
marketable in these difficult economic times.
  Making private activity bonds no longer subject to the AMT would help 
with the issuance of bonds. This legislation would assist in needed 
relief to State and local governments across the Nation. It would 
provide more buyers to the market, resulting in interest savings for 
issuers, and ultimately taxpayers.

[[Page S116]]

  Subjecting private activity bond interest to the AMT could cost an 
issuer 25 to 30 more basis points when issuing an AMT bond compared to 
a non-AMT bond. However, the recent freezing of the municipal credit 
market has led the difference to rise as much as 100 basis points. This 
results in increased costs for various infrastructure projects 
including airports, docks and other transportation-related facilities; 
water, sewer and other utility facilities; and solid and hazardous 
waste disposal facilities.
  Last Congress, I worked on a provision to exempt the interest from 
private activity housing bonds from the AMT and this provision was 
included in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. The 
legislation Senator Snowe and I are introducing builds on this 
provision by exempting interest from all private activity bonds from 
the AMT.
  I believe this legislation will help spur the economy and create 
jobs. This legislation will provide better funding options for 
essential infrastructure projects and create jobs across the country. I 
look forward to working with my colleagues on this important 
legislation.
                                 ______
```