alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 278A/11 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 278A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4811 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 278A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4811 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 278A/1 | Publication of a vacancy notice for the post of assistant — Reference: Council/B/025 | 1 |
| | European Central Bank |
| 2005/C 278A/2 | Vacancy in the Directorate-General Legal Services Deputy — Director-General Legal Services | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Council

2005/C 278A/1

Publication of a vacancy notice for the post of assistant — Reference: Council/B/025

1

European Central Bank

2005/C 278A/2

Vacancy in the Directorate-General Legal Services Deputy — Director-General Legal Services

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 10.3


 


FORM OF AMENDMENT


TO


SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE


 


THIS
                  
AMENDMENT TO SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of
September     , 2010 by and among TECHNISCAN,
INC., (the “Maker”) and the undersigned holder of the Maker’s
senior secured convertible promissory note (together with his heirs, successors
and assigns, “Payee”).


 


R  E  C  I  T  A
L  S:


 


WHEREAS,
the Maker and the Payee desire to revise that certain Senior Secured
Convertible Promissory Note dated
                      ,
2010 entered into by and between the Maker and the Payee (the “Note”).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual benefits
to be derived from this Amendment, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1.             Amendment
of the Note.  Pursuant to Section 11 of the Note:


 


(a)  Section 3 of the Note is hereby amended as
follows:


 


The date September 30, 2010 shall
be deleted and replaced with October 8, 2010.


 


(b)  Sections 6(b)(iv)(B) and (C) of the Note are
hereby amended as follows:


 


The date October 1, 2010 shall be
deleted and replaced with October 8, 2010.


 


(c) 
Section 6(b)(v) of the Note is hereby amended as follows:


 


Each of July 30, 2010 and
September 15, 2010 shall be deleted and replaced with October 8, 2010.


 


2.             Continued
Effect of the Note.  All provisions of the Note, except as
modified by this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect and are
reaffirmed.  Other than as stated in this
Amendment, this Amendment shall not operate as a waiver of any condition or
obligation imposed on the parties under the Note.


 


3.             Interpretation
of Amendment.  In the event of any conflict, inconsistency,
or incongruity between any provision of this Amendment and any provision of the
Note, the provisions of this Amendment shall govern and control.


 


4.             Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in any number
of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which
together shall constitute one and the same agreement.  A facsimile or e-mailed “.pdf” data file copy
of an original written signature shall be deemed to have the same effect as an
original written signature.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the
date first set forth above.


 

















 


	
  TECHNISCAN, INC.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  David C. Robinson

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  Name:
Order entered July 30, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00791-CV

BILL MCINTYRE, Appellant

V.

ELY EDWARDS AND WILLIE RUTH EDWARDS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-03032

ORDER

By letter dated June 30, 2015, the Court directed appellant to pay the filing fee for the 

appeal within ten days. By letter dated July 10, 2015, we notified appellant that the Dallas 

County District Clerk informed the Court that appellant has not paid for the clerk’s record. 

Appellant has not responded to either letter, but we note that the reporter’s record was filed on 

July 10, 2015.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to pay, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, 

the $195 filing fee for the appeal.

We further ORDER appellant to provide this Court, within TEN DAYS of the date of 

this order, with written verification that he has paid or made payment arrangements for the 

clerk’s record.
We warn appellant that if the filing fee is not paid and we do not receive written 

verification regarding payment for the clerk’s record, we will, without further notice, dismiss 

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to appellant Bill McIntyre and to 

counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael Coppins, state and attest that:



| | (1) |  | I am the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Main Place Funding, LLC (the Registrant).
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the quarterly Report on 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the quarterly report) containing financial statements fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for
the periods presented.
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL
COPPINS                                    
|Michael Coppins Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



May 13, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                          1018402
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7729032
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  119083076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           0
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                      59700548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    119083076
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26546901
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19068127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                500000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3710959
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3267815
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3267815
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3267815
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26618]

[[Page 90329]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 15, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 675 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-338, K2025-336.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26618 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                     11,934,788
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           12,159,302
<PP&E>                                     863,075
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             14,354,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      643,488
<BONDS>                                    8,250,682
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   9,061
<OTHER-SE>                                 5,450,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               14,354,145
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,365,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         171,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,537,857)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,537,857)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,537,857)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.22)
        

</TABLE>
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

Commission Monthly Case Activity for June 2013 

 

 

 

1. 

Cases Pending Beginning of Month 

32 

 

 

 

 

2. 

Cases Added to Docket 

 

Action Electric Company 

No. 12-1496 

Direction for Review on 6/14/13 

 

Calpine Corporation 

No. 11-1734 

Direction for Review on 6/24/13 

 

2 

 

3. 

Cases Subtracted From Docket 

 

 

 

0 

4. 

Total Cases Pending End of Month 

34
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>


                                  Exhibit 27.1
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X


This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Balance
Sheet,  Statement  of  Operations,  Statement  of Cash  Flows and Notes  thereto
incorporated in Part 1, Item 1, of this Form 10-QSB is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                   jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                                         392,745
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  131,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    12,247,019
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               14,092,150
<PP&E>                                                         9,866,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 (4,283,071)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 22,598,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          9,470,382
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    6,346,217
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (2,184,661)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   22,598,023
<SALES>                                                        6,508,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               6,508,565
<CGS>                                                          3,763,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  3,763,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               3,977,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             965,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (1,548,039)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (1,548,039)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (1,548,039)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (1,548,039)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.39)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007 of AMERCO (the
      “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2007
      (the “Report”), I, Jason A. Berg, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.


AMERCO,


a Nevada corporation




/s/
      Jason A. Berg


Jason A. Berg


Chief Accounting Officer


Date:
      June 6, 2007
<PAGE>

32.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
        of VOXEL pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VOXEL (the "Company")
for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael Anthony,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of VOXEL, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 17, 2008


                                    /s/ Michael Anthony
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Michael Anthony
                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                    /s/ Michael Anthony
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Michael Anthony
                                    Chief Financial Officer
On respondent’s motion for reconsideration filed April 27,

reconsideration allowed, opinion (111 Or App 392,823 P2d 1040 (1992)) withdrawn; conviction affirmed and remanded for resentencing June 16, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*NADAIR D. JENABZADEH, *Appellant.*

(9011-36365; CA A68311)

853 P2d 325

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for motion.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Motion for reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; conviction affirmed and remanded for resentencing. *State v. Ferrell,*315 Or 213, 843 P2d 939 (1992).
# Official Journal C 356/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 356 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 646 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 356

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 646 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 356/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10420 — Brookfield/Digital Realty/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 356/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10231 — AerCap/GECAS/SES) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 356/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10420 — Brookfield/Digital Realty/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 356/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10231 — AerCap/GECAS/SES) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 356/03 | Euro exchange rates — 3 September 2021 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 356/03

Euro exchange rates — 3 September 2021

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 127375(34) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, THOMAS A. CENSKE, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 127375 

 COA: 256102 

Dep’t of Community Health:

 04-002142-RR 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF 

COMMUNITY HEALTH, and

CMH PATHWAYS OF MARQUETTE, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of 

May 31, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously. 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
#### McNEELY & WALTON v. J. A. HAYNES & Co.

*Arrest — Liability of Partners.*

A defendant cannot be arrested under O. 0. P. § 149. (sub. sec. 4) unless *lie*has been guiltjr of fraud in contracting the debt for which the action is brought. *Therefore,*when *one*partner in a firm obtains credit by false representations, the *other*partner is not liable to arrest.

MotioN to vacate an Order of Arrest, made at Fall Tet m, 1876, of Eowan Superior Court, before *Cloud, J.*.

No statement of the facts is necessary to an understanding of the opinion. ITis Honor allowed the motion to vacate, and the plaintiff appealed.

*Mr. Jas. C*Kerr, for the plaintiffs.

*Mr. J. M. McCorkle,*for the defendants.

Bynum, J.

The defendants, J. A. and Calvin Haynes were partners in a mercantile business carried on in the county of Yadkin, where they both lived.

The plaintiffs were doing business in the town of Salisbury. Calvin Haynes purchased of the plaintiffs a bill of goods, as he at the time alleged, for the defendant firm and obtained credit therefor by false pretences and representations.

The plaintiffs thereupon instituted an action against both J. A. and Calvin Haynes, upon which .J. A. Haynes only was arrested, Calvin having escaped.

In a civil action, the defendant cannot be arrested, unless *he*has been guilty of a fraud in contracting the debt. C. C. P. § 149, sub. section 4. As it appears from the case, J. A. Haynes was not present when the goods were purchased by, Calvin, had no knowledge of it and in no wise connived at *123or assented to it; nor does it appear that the goods were-sent to ór received by him. His affidavit negatives every allegation of fraud on his part and the counter-affidavit of' the plaintiff does not contradict it.

His, Honor did not err in vacating the order of arrest as-to the defendant J. A.'Haynes.

Pee, Curiam. Judgment affirmed.