alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CEREUS TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      16,972,112
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  955,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,002,493
<PP&E>                                         532,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,244,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,624,921
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,415
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,518,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,244,967
<SALES>                                      1,591,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,591,325
<CGS>                                        1,433,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,433,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,565,104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,354,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,354,699
<DISCONTINUED>                                 236,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              7,187,500
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (16,778,199)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10833]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED

  As in executive session the Presiding Officer laid before the Senate 
messages from the President of the United States submitting sundry 
nominations which were referred to the appropriate committees.
  (The nominations received today are printed at the end of the Senate 
proceedings.)

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  7

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            270,804
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                               485
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                 497
<EQUITIES>                                          447
<MORTGAGE>                                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  271,736
<CASH>                                            2,863
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              328,354
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                            7,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  640,249
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 417,526
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              90,807
<POLICY-OTHER>                                        0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                 0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          7,079
<OTHER-SE>                                       71,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    640,249
<PREMIUMS>                                       80,891
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              15,694
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 (192)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    6,231
<BENEFITS>                                       82,045
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      15,245
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                              4,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (147)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (64)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (83)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (83)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.01)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  143,494
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              73,741
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                 8,304
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               23,804
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 56,475
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 145,260
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          (8,304)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 29A/9 Fe

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 29A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 509 February 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 29A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 509 February 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Chemicals Agency |
| 2007/C 029A/01 | Publication of a vacancy for Executive Director of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in Helsinki (Grade AD 15) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Chemicals Agency

2007/C 029A/01

Publication of a vacancy for Executive Director of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in Helsinki (Grade AD 15)

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Chemicals Agency

| 9.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 29/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 29/1

---

Publication of a Vacancy for Executive Director of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in Helsinki (Grade AD 15)

(2007/C 29 A/01)

The REACH Regulation, which will enter into force on 1 June 2007, will establish a new regulatory framework for chemical substances in the European Union. At the heart of REACH is the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), to be set up in Helsinki, Finland. The ECHA will be responsible for managing technical, scientific and administrative aspects of REACH, and ensuring consistency in its application. It will provide the Member States and the EU institutions with the best possible scientific and technical advice on chemicals issues.

For the post of Executive Director, the Commission seeks candidates with the capacity to lead a major EU regulatory agency in its key early years and steer it through the scientific, technical and organisational challenges of establishing a complex regulatory process in a field that is politically sensitive and crucial to human health, the environment, economic competitiveness and innovation. Candidates should combine solid management experience with leadership in relevant scientific or technical fields.

The Executive Director will be appointed by the Management Board of the Agency from a list of candidates selected by the European Commission. He/she will be appointed as a member of the temporary staff at grade AD 15 pursuant to Article 2a of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities for a period of five years that may be extended once for a further period of up to five years.

For full information, you will find the vacancy notice and application form at the following addresses:

http://www.ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

and

http://www.ec.europa.eu/enterprise/reach/prep_jobs_en.htm

The closing date for the submission of applications is 23 March 2007.

---
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 143 

Honoring the 75th anniversary of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball 

League (AAGPBL). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2018 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself, Mr. CAPUANO, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, and Mr. 

KEATING) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 75th anniversary of the All-American Girls 

Professional Baseball League (AAGPBL). 

Whereas the manpower demands of World War II forced 

many minor league baseball teams to disband as players 

were drafted, resulting in a dearth of minor league teams 

by late 1942; 

Whereas Major League Baseball teams were warned, in late 

1942, by the Federal Government that increased manpower mobilization could result in the canceling of the 

1943 baseball season, threatening to shutter Major 

League Baseball parks across the country; 

Whereas the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League 

(AAGPBL) was established, and spring training for the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 143 IH 

AAGPBL started on May 17, 1943, to address the shortages of baseball players; 

Whereas during its tenure (1943–1954), the AAGPBL provided over 600 women the chance to play professional 

baseball, an opportunity never before afforded to female 

athletes in America; 

Whereas Penny Marshall’s film, ‘‘A League of Their Own’’, 

familiarized millions of Americans with the history of the 

AAGPBL; and 

Whereas at least 29 women from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts played in the AAGPBL, including Noella 

Leduc Alverson, Rita Briggs, Patricia Brown, Jean 

Buckley, Cynthia Esposito, Normine Capritta, Joan 

Tysver Chiancola, Clara Chiano, Patricia Courtney, Mary 

Dailey, Alice DeCambra, Madeline English, Annie 

Gosbee, Dorothy Green, Josephine Hasham, Lillian 

DeCambra Kelley, Marie Mansfield Kelley, Helen Ketola 

LaCamera, Rhoda Leonard Linehan, Marie Eileen 

Albright Lockhart, Georgette Vincent Mooney, Helen 

Nordquist, Beatrice Arbour Parrott, Katherine Pechulis, 

Lucille Stone Richards, Grace Rogato, Mary Sheehan, 

Barbara Parks Young, Sue Parsons Zipay, and Mary 

Pratt of Quincy, who is celebrating her 100th birthday 

this year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress honors the 75th anniversary 

3 of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League 

4 (AAGPBL). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**~ ~**  March 19,2014

CBIC Control Number 359184 Director, Chemical Control Division

rl./ r.· (' r..- ; \I:;:-· L··;·**~L** .. 1,,/ [_: N I,.., • O ooy**Cf~jl"'** j l .,,...,**t~** 20 ll1**l'~r~R** 31 AN 6: 29 DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts Chambers Works Deepwater, NJ 08023 RECEIVED APR 15 US Environmental**Prot~~tion** Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

EPA DOCKET CENTER Room4146 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Re: EPA- HQ- OPPT- 2003

- 0012 DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100

PFOA Data Submittal- Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples February 2014 Sample Data Dear Chemical Control Division: ·Attached please find summaries ofPFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfal1 1 DSN662A in February 2014. In accordance with '"\ the current site NJPDES permit (NJ000510b, effective September 2011), these results are ' provided to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results from this monitoring period. ?)1!w Albert Patrick O'Neill Unit Manager-Site Manufacturing Systems/Fluoroproducts DuPont Chambers Works APO/clc EnclosuresCopy to: Document Control Office US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East Room6428 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) Principal Environmental Engineer

NJDEP Division of Water Quality Bureau of Water Surfacing Mail Code 40 1-02B

401 E. State Street P.O. Box420 Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 (.• ·l,

(: .jAnalytePFOA-SampleIDDateTop(ft)Total(T)/Bottom(ft)unitsDiss.(D)Duplicate#ug/LTSummaryofAnalyticalResults662-February2014662-GRAB662-GRAB662-GRAB 662-GRAB2/3/142/10/142/17/142/24/140000000011113.313.262.232.80PFOA=PerfluorooctanoicAcidug/L=microgramsperLiterIIug/L=microgramsperliterorpartsperbillion(ppb)LOQ-limitofquantification=0.100ug/LSampleswereanalyzedbyCriticalPathServicesLLC.Reportedresultsrepresentasingleanalysis,exceptforthesamplecollectedon2/24/14.Acceptableprecisionwasobtainedandthereportedresultforthesamplecollectedon2/24/14representstheaverageoflabduplicateresults.I--TheNJDEPlabcertificationnumberforCriticalPathServicesL.:LCisPA072.<andNO=NondetectatstatedreportinglimitPage1of1'Copyofcwk662grabresults_feb14.xls:Sheet13/18/20142:00PM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E29]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. LUIS V. GUTIERREZ

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, January 7, 2009

  Mr. GUTIERREZ. Madam Speaker, I was unavoidably absent from this 
Chamber today. I would like the record to show that, had I been 
present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall votes 1 and 4; ``nay'' 
on rollcall vote 3; and for Rep. Nancy Pelosi (CA-08) on rollcall vote 
2 for the election of the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of Sento Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick F. O'Neal, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|May 17, 2004 | /s/PATRICK F. O'NEALPatrick F. O'Neal
President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
D1335 

Friday, January 2, 2009 

Daily Digest 

Highlights 

Second Session of the 110th Congress adjourned sine die. 

See Interim Re ́sume ́ of Congressional Activity. 

Senate 

Chamber Action 

Senate met at 10:00:02 a.m. in pro forma session, 

and in accordance with the provisions of H. Con. 

Res. 440, adjourned sine die at 10:00:33 a.m. until 

12 noon, on Tuesday, January 6, 2009. 

Committee Meetings 

(Committees not listed did not meet) 

h 

No committee meetings were held. 

House of Representatives 

Chamber Action 

The House was not in session today. The House 

is scheduled to meet at 11 a.m. on Saturday, January 

3, 2009, pursuant to the provisions of H. Con. Res. 

440. 

Committee Meetings 

No committee meetings were held. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with DIGEST
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 69 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 69

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 6, 2017

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On October 6, 2017, or on such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the 

              

Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly 
designate, the 32d annual District of Columbia Special Olympics Law 
Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as the ``event'') 
may be run through the Capitol Grounds to carry the Special Olympics 
torch to honor local Special Olympics athletes.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 5, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Peter Arrington v. Gideon Bass *et al.*

The defendant in a *ca- so.*bond, given under the act of 1822 *{Rev. c.*1131) is bound to attend at every term until the cause is finally disposed of.

The defendant *Bass*was arrested upon a *ca.*sa. and gave bond under the act of 1822 *{Tuylor’s Rev.*c. 1131) for his appearance at the August term, 1829, of Nash County Court. At that term, the following entry was made in the cause : “ Continued, upon cause shown by the defendant.” At the ensuing- term, upon a default by *Bass,*judgment was rendered «gainst the defendant and his sureties “ now as of the last termfrom which the defendants appealed.

On the'last circuit, his Honor Judge MartiN reversed the judgment of the County Court, and the plaintiff appealed.

*96
      *A*judgment , *nwnc pro tunc*is not erroneous, that0” it should have been as of the present term.

*BewrmXf*for the plnintifiV

*Badger, contra.*

Haxx, Judge.

The first notice we have of this case

is at August term, 1829= At that term the case was continued upon cause shown by the defendant *Bass ;*and the court by the, act of 1822 *(Rex c.*1131) had the power; to continue it upon sufficient cause shown. Suppose for instance, that owing to some unavoidable accident, the defendant had it not in his power to prove, that he had given ten'days, notice to Ido creditors or their agents;, or attorneys, of his intention to avail himself of the benefit of the act: the court could not dó otherwise than grant a continuance. At November term, judgment was given against the defendant; and nothing illegal appears, in that The reason why -it was entered *nunc pro túne,*is not obvious. But certainly they ought to have given judgment, because it does not appear’ that the defendant *Bass then made Ms*appearance, or caused it to he en- .,, . tered. The bond which he gave for bis appearance was as °hligutoiy 011 him to attend then, as at the preceding term when the continuance was, granted at his instance, *(Mooring*v. *James, ante*2 vol. 254.) And as he did not enter his appearance at the subsequent term» judgment against Mm was the legal consequence.

Ter Cuiíxusí.' — Judgment reversed.
#### Ingram, Appellant, *v.*Orangers.

April 15, 1907:

*Appeals*— Attachment *under Act of March*17, 1869, P. *L. 8*— Records *—Evidence—Discretion of court*— Quashing *appeal.*

*■*An appeal from an order dissolving an attachment under the fraudulent debtors Act of March 17, 1869, P. L. 8, takes up nothing but the record proper, which does not include the evidence. If there is no error in the record the appeal will be quashed; and in such a case a motion to quash will be entertained before the return day.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1907.

Appeal, No. 257, Oct. T., 1906, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1906, No. 1,891, dissolving attachment under act of 1869,’ in case of Charles Ingram and Alfred Armitage, trading as Armitage Brothers, v. Charles C. Orangers.

Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Head and Be ayer, JJ.

Appeal quashed.

Motion fo quash appeal.

*Charles II. Roberts*and *Hugh Roberts,*for appellants.

6r. *Douglas Bartlett*and *George Wentworth Carr,*for appellee.

'Per Curiam,

This is a rule to sho,w cause why the plaintiff’s appeal from an order dissolving their attachment issued under the Act of March *31717,1869, P. L. 8, should not be quashed. It is apparent from the appellants’ answer to this rule that the matter complained of is, not that the court did not have jurisdiction to dissolve the attachment, nor that there is any irregularity in the proceedings, but that the court erred in not talcing a different view of the evidence. But the appeal in such a case brings up nothing but the record proper, which does not include the evidence on which the court acted in dissolving the attachment. Hence, if the proceedings are regular, the action of the court is not reviewable on appeal: Wetherald v. Shupe, 109 Pa. *389;*Black v. Oblender, 2 Mona. 339 ; Hoppes v. Houtz, 133 Pa. 34; Hall v. Oyster, 168 Pa. 399 ; Werner v. Gross, 174 Pa. 622 ; Lafferty v. Corcoran, 175 Pa. 5. Ordinarily, an appeal will not be quashed before the return day, but it has been done in cases of appeals from interlocutory judgments ; also where the record showed a waiver of appeal, and in other exceptional instances. As the object of this appeal is not to correct any error of record, but to bring up for review the discretionary action of the court on the evidence — a matter not reviewable — it seems to be a proper case to entertain a motion to quash before the return day.

The rule to show cause why the appeal should not be quashed is made absolute.