alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000928032
<NAME> AIM GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          40,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  384,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    174,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               627,148
<PP&E>                                         720,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                 181,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,212,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          743,478
<BONDS>                                      1,121,956
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,801
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,309,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,212,514
<SALES>                                        572,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               572,092
<CGS>                                          428,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  724,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               246,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (152,605)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (152,605)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (152,605)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.038)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF SARBANES – OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Joseph J.Talley Chief Financial Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company. (the“Company”), does hereby certify that:

 

1.               TheCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed aspart of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 26th day ofNovember, 2003.

 
| By:    | /s/ Joseph  J. Talley           |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Joseph  J. Talley         |
|   | Title: Chief  Financial Officer |
|        |                                 |        |  |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 102 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 102

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2018

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
    for an event to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the birth of 
                          Frederick Douglass.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE 200TH 
              ANNIVERSARY OF BIRTH OF FREDERICK DOUGLASS.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on

              

 February 14, 2018, for an event to celebrate the 200th anniversary of 
the birth of Frederick Douglass.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, I, P.
Chrisman Iribe, President of Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  (1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Indiantown
Cogeneration, L.P. August 12, 2004
    /s/ P. CHRISMAN IRIBEP. Chrisman IribePresident
Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. and will be retained by Indiantown
Cogeneration, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

Commission Monthly Case Activity for August 2011 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 37 

 

2. Cases Added to Docket 

Ford Motor Company – Buffalo Stamping Plant 

No. 10-1483 

Direction for Review on 08/10/11 

1 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket 

Ford Motor Company – Buffalo Stamping Plant 

No. 10-1483 

Remand Order on 08/30/11 

-1 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 37
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          22,912
<SECURITIES>                                       400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,231
<PP&E>                                           9,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,599
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,100
<SALES>                                         37,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,228
<CGS>                                           21,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,516
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,002
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        

</TABLE>
#### Aznoe v. Conway.

1. Instruction: no evidence to sustain. An instruction based on an hypothesis which there is no evidence tending to sustain is erroneous. (See opinion for illustration.)

*Appeal from Osceola Circuit Court.*

Wednesday, October 12.

ActioN to recover for an injury to the plaintiffs buggy and horse, alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

*O. J. Ciarle,*for appellant.

*J. R. Morris,*for appellee.

Adams, Ch. J.

At the time of the accident the parties were driving each a span of horses upon a public highway in the same direction. The defendant was alone and had a lumber wagon. The plaintiff had a single seated buggy, and two others were riding with him upon the seat. He was behind the defendant, and undertook to pass him. The defendant, seeing the attempt to pass, struck his own horses with his whip, and urged them with- his voice. Thereupon the plaintiff’s horses became uncontrollable, and in entering upon a bridge in the road, struck it so hard as to break the buggy to pieces, and the horses escaped, and one of them broke his leg.

The court, at the request of the plaintiff, gave an'instruction in these words:, “If you find from all the evidence in the case that at the time, at the place, and in the manner in which the plaintiff undertook to pass the defendant, he was not acting as a reasonable, prudent man should, your conclusion would be that he was guilty of contributory negligence. *569Tet if this was known to the defendant at the time, and he, the defendant, could have avoided the injury by the exercise of reasonable care, he should not be excused, and the plaintiff would be entitled to i-ecover.” The giving of this instruction is assigned as error. The defendant insists that the last part of the instruction should not have been given, because there is no evidence upon which it could be based. The fact appeal’s to be that the road was wide enough to allow the plaintiff to pass in safety, and all that the defendant saw was an attempt to pass him on such a road. The plaintiff’s negligence, if any, grew largely out of an attempt to pass with the kind of team which he had, and where he was unfavorably situated for holding such a team. He testified that one of his horses was wild, and both were hard on the bit, and he was so seated that he lacked elbow-room, and could not pull very hard on his lines. These important facts contributing to the plaintiff’s danger, and tending to'make his acts negligence, do not appear to have been known to the defendant, — at least, not when he struck his horses with his whip and shouted to them. In our opinion, the instruction cannot be sustained.

Some other questions are presented growing out of alleged defects in the petition, and failure of proof to conform to the allegations; but, as the petition will probably be amended before another trial, it is unnecessary to determine the questions. REVERSED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 10(ccc)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                       TO
                               COMSEARCH DIVISION
                            SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN
                           (EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1996)


       WHEREAS, Allen Telecom Inc. sponsors the Comsearch Division Supplemental
Savings Plan (the "Plan");

       NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows, effective
as of January 1, 2000:

                                       I.

       Section 2.8 of the Plan is hereby amended to provide as follows:

              SECTION 2.8. EXECUTIVE shall mean, for a particular Plan Year,
       either:

              (i)    an Employee of the Comsearch Division of the Company, or

              (ii)   effective for the 1999 Plan Year, a Northern Virginia
                     Participant

         (a) for whom Additional Employer Contributions under the Savings Plan
         are limited by Section 401(a)(17) or 415 of the Code, or (b) who elects
         to make "Executive Deferrals" under the Allen Telecom Inc. Deferred
         Compensation Plan.


       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be
executed this day _______ of ___________________, 2000.

                                                    ALLEN TELECOM INC.



                                                    By__________________________

                                                    Its_________________________
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 116 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2018 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1625. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1625, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following correction: Amend the long title so as to read: 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 116 RDS 

1 ‘‘Making appropriations for the fiscal year ending Sep2 tember 30, 2018, and for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 22, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
hpgexhibit104.htm










Exhibit 10.4


 





 


 


 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  









 




  





4











  









 




  





5











  









 




  





6











  









 




  





7











  









 




  





8











  









 




  





9











  









 




  





10











  









 




  





11











  









 




  





12











  









 




  





13











  









 




  





14











  









 15
cbdpage.htm


Exhibit 4x

CONTRACT BENEFIT DATA












Contract Number:  [99-9999999]







Annuitant:  [John Doe]


Age Nearest Birthday:  [65]


Sex:  [Male]







Secondary Life:  [Jane Doe]


Age Nearest Birthday:  [62]


Sex:  [Female]












Rider Date:  [February 1, 2011]







Initial Access Period:  [15] Years







Initial Assumed Investment Return:  [3.00]%







Periodic Income Commencement Date:  [February 1, 2011]







Initial Periodic Income Payment Mode:  [Monthly]







Initial Periodic Income Payment:  [$411.26]







Initial Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [$205.63]







Death Benefit Option:  [Account Value Death Benefit]







[VAPOR Rider Charge:  [0.40%]]







Mortality and Expense Risk Charge and Administrative Charge







During Access Period


[Account Value Death Benefit without Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [1.65%]]


[Account Value Death Benefit with Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [2.15%]]







[Guarantee of Principal Death Benefit without Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [1.70%]]


[Guarantee of Principal Death Benefit with Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [2.20%]]







[Enhanced Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit without Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [1.95%]]


[Enhanced Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit with Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [2.45%]]












After Access Period


[Account Value Death Benefit without Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [1.65%]]


[Account Value Death Benefit with Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [2.15%]]







[Guarantee of Principal Death Benefit without Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [1.65%]]


[Guarantee of Principal Death Benefit with Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [2.15%]]







[Enhanced Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit without Guaranteed Income Benefit:  1.65%]]


[Enhanced Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit with Guaranteed Income Benefit:  [2.15%]]
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Record Steel and Construction, Inc.

dba RSCI )

) ASBCA No. 63563

)

Under Contract No. W912BV

- 19

- C

- 0002 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Tyler J. Anderson, Esq.

Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP

Boise, ID

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Lauren M. Williams, Esq.

Thomas E. Rogers, V, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys

U.S. Army Engineer District, Tulsa

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 24, 2024

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63563

, Appeal of Record

Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCI , rendered in conformance with the Board’s

Charter.

Dated: June 24, 2024 REBA PAGE

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### COMMISSIONERS OF UNION COUNTY v. THE CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY.

*Township Trustees — Assessment of Taxes.*

‘Where the Board of Trustees of a Township meet the County Commissioners in joint session, at the request of the party interested, and assess property for taxation and make a verbal report of the same to-the Commissioners : *Held,*that the assessment was properly made.

Appeal from an Order confirming the decision of the Board, of Commissioners of UNION County, made at Pall Term,. 1876, of the Superior Court of said county, by Buxton, *J.*

The question presented for the decision of this Court is sufficiently stated' in its opinion.

*Messrs.*Merrimon, *Fuller Ashe,*for the plaintiff.

*Mr. Robert Strange,*for the defendant.

Eaircloth, J.

The defendant having failed to list its properly, as required by law, for taxation, through its Attorney requested the several Township Boards, through which the road passed, and the Board of Commissioners to *124convene in joint session to hear said Attorney, and after doing so, the Township Boards made their assessments in presence of the Board of Commissioners, which assessments was at once entered on the records of the said Board of Commissioners. The defendant appealed, on the ground that the Township Boards made their reports to the Commissioners *verbally*and not in *writing.*His Honor overruled the objection, and in effect, as we understand it, decided that the assessments were properly made or at least were sufficient.

Under the circumstances we see ¿10 objection to the decision of His Honor, and it is affirmed, and the plaintiff will recover costs in this Court.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 69 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 69

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On October 6, 2017, or on such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the 

              

Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly 
designate, the 32d annual District of Columbia Special Olympics Law 
Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as the ``event'') 
may be run through the Capitol Grounds to carry the Special Olympics 
torch to honor local Special Olympics athletes.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 5, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 69

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.
```