alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### White Eagle Oil & Refining Company, Appellant, vs. Baker and others, Respondents.

*October 10*

November *5, 1929.*

*101For the appellant there were briefs by *R. V. Ahlstrom*and *Q. H.*Hale, both of La Crosse, and oral argument by *Mr. Hale.*

For the lespondents Berg, Sias, Nelson, and Rude there was a brief by *George H. Gordon, Law & Gordon*of La Crosse, and oral argument by *Stanley G. Gordon.*

Crownhart, J.

The appellant contends that the payment in full settlement of a sum much less than the amount due through the fraud of the defendant Baker did not constitute an accord and satisfaction because of lack of consideration.

It clearly appears that the appellant was deceived as to the amount embezzled by Baker, and entered into the settlement in ignorance of the true amount due. Baker cannot profit by such conduct. He paid nothing by way of compromise of a disputed or unliquidated claim. He had embezzled a large sum in excess of the amount disclosed to appellant. He knew that appellant was misled by his fraudulent suppression of his defalcations. There was no consideration passed for the acceptance by appellant of less than the true amount due.

*102The bondsmen gave no part of the amount paid by Baker. They yielded up nothing by way of consideration for their release on their bond. They were bound by their bond to discharge all defaults of Baker to the appellant. They paid nothing and discharged nothing. The discharge of claims by way of accord and satisfaction is dependent upon a contract, express or implied. Therefore the essentials of a contract must obtain in an accord and satisfaction, among which are a meeting of the minds of the parties, and a consideration. Here there was no meeting of the minds of the parties because of the fraudulent concealment of the facts by Baker, and there was no consideration for the settlement. The appellant was entitled to judgment on the undisputed facts. 1 Ruling Case Law, p. 178; 1 Corp. Jur. p. 523; *Leslie v. Keepers,*68 Wis. 123, 31 N. W. 486; *Colby Cheese Box Co. v. Laabs,*186 Wis. 358, 202 N. W. 795; *M. Schulz Co. v. Gether,*183 Wis. 491, 198 N. W. 433; *Chicago, St. P., M. & O. R. Co. v. McDougald,*184 Wis. 227, 199 N. W. 68.

The parties stipulated the amount due from Baker to the appellant, and the amount for which the bondsmen are liable. We have some difficulty in determining the exact amounts from the stipulation. For this reason the case will go back to the trial court to enter the proper judgment.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, with directions to the trial court to enter judgment in accordance with this opinion.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H24]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   REAPPOINTMENT OF INDIVIDUALS TO GOVERNING BOARD OF THE OFFICE OF 
                          CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 4(d) of House Resolution 
5, 111th Congress, and the order of the House of today, the Chair 
announces the reappointment of the following individuals to serve as 
the Governing Board of the Office of Congressional Ethics: Nominated by 
the Speaker with the concurrence of the minority leader:
  Mr. David Skaggs, Colorado, Chairman
  Mrs. Yvonne Brathwaite Burke, California, subject to section 
1(b)(6)(B)
  Ms. Karan English, Arizona, subject to section 1(b)(6)(B)
  Mr. Abner Mikva, Illinois, Alternate Nominated by the minority leader 
with the concurrence of the Speaker:
  Mr. Porter J. Goss, Florida, Cochairman
  Mr. James M. Eagen, III, Colorado, subject to section 1(b)(6)(B)
  Ms. Allison R. Hayward, Virginia, subject to section 1(b)(6)(B)
  Mr. Bill Frenzel, Virginia, Alternate

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 24(a)

 

February 16, 2009

 

Melissa K. Caen and Wayne Boston

 

Ms. Caen and Mr. Boston:

 

The Southern Company (the “Company”) proposes to file or join in the filing of reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the following:  (1) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and (2) the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q during 2009.

The Company and the undersigned directors and officers of the Company, individually as a director and/or as an officer of the Company, hereby make, constitute and appoint each of you our true and lawful Attorney for each of us and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the foregoing said Annual Report on Form 10-K, said Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and any necessary or appropriate amendment or amendments to any such reports, to be accompanied in each case by any necessary or appropriate exhibits or schedules thereto.

|   | Yours very truly,

 

THE SOUTHERN COMPANY                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  

 

                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | By                /s/David M. Ratcliffe

David M. Ratcliffe

Chairman of the Board, President

and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
# Official Journal C 22/21 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 22 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5921 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 22

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5921 January 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 022/1 | Common Catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — first supplement to the 34th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 022/1

Common Catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — first supplement to the 34th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26378]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 618 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-258, K2025-256.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26378 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# Official Journal L 373/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 373 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 639 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 373

English edition

Legislation

Volume 639 November 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1646 of 7 November 2020 on commercial policy measures concerning certain products from the United States of America following the adjudication of a trade dispute under the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the World Trade Organization | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1646 of 7 November 2020 on commercial policy measures concerning certain products from the United States of America following the adjudication of a trade dispute under the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the World Trade Organization

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, I, David P. Szostak, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PetroAlgae Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of PetroAlgae Inc.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ David P. Szostak          
|Name: David P. Szostak        
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer) 

Dated: May 13, 2011

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10776]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          RECESS UNTIL MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2008, AT 9:30 A.M.

  Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, if there is no further business to come 
before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it stand in recess 
under the previous order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 6:03 p.m., recessed until 
Monday, November 24, 2008, at 9:30 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 32.2.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David M. Young, Chief Financial Officer of TESSCOTechnologies Incorporated (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.             The Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 26, 2010(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 3, 2010 | /s/ David M. Young |
|-----------------------------|--------------------|
|                        | David M. Young     |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10887]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     RECESS UNTIL 10 A.M. TOMORROW

  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, if there is no further business to come 
before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate stand in 
recess under the previous order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 6:45 p.m., recessed until 
Thursday, December 11, 2008, at 10 a.m.
```
May 1 5 , 2015

The Honorable John Kerry Secretary of State U.S. Department of State 2201 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20520

The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New J ersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable Penny S. Pritzker Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230

Re: Docket s No. DOS

- 2015

- 0016, DOT

- OST

- 2015

- 0082 , and DOC

- 2015

- 0001

Dear Secretaries Kerry, Foxx and Pritzker:

As you know, three major U.S. airlines have asked the federal government to unravel the Open Skies agreements originally negotiated to protect and expand international air travel for consumers. This misguided approach would artificially prop up these airline s at the expense of international travelers like myself.

As a longtime resident of Da llas and member of The IIT Alumni Association of North Texas ("IITNT" for short) and is incorporated as a not

- for

- profit corporation in the State

of Texas. I respectfull y ask you to protect our Open Skies agreements in their current form. To act otherwise would be unfair, anti

- competitive, and frankly un

- American.

These agreements have been in place for many years and have dramatically expanded

international air travel both to and from the United States. Such activity has led to increased commerce and trade, enhanced productivity, and more jobs here in the United States. These agreements have also enhanced the ability of our local residents

and businesses to connect w ith global markets, individuals and communities around the

world.

By renegotiating previously established Open Skies agreements, U.S. carriers are seeking protectionist policies that would tilt the playing field in their direction. Moreover, frequent tr avelers and tourists to and from international destinations will bear the brunt, with fewer travel choices and decreased competition. Such an impact would ultimately be felt throughout the entire Dallas economy.The current Open Skies agreements with Gu lf carriers are essential to creating a fair

and robust international travel marketplace

– and affordable options for consumers, It is because of these reasons that I urge you to uphold this important policy and let the free market work the way it was inte nded to.

Sincerely,

Anand Gupta Technology Professional staying in Dallas

- Fortworth area for 20+ years

Date: 5/15/2015
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-12917 and 333-89613)
pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Stock Incentive Plan of Sento Corporation and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-115945) of
Sento Corporation and in the related Prospectus of our report dated April 19, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sento Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the year ended March 31, 2005.



Salt
Lake City, Utah
June 27, 2005

---



QuickLinks
# Official Journal L 157/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 157 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6120 June 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 157

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6120 June 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2018/884 of 16 October 2017 on aid measure SA.32874 (2012/C) (ex SA.32874 (2011/NN)) implemented by Denmark
  (notified under document C(2017) 4461)


   (1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2018/884 of 16 October 2017 on aid measure SA.32874 (2012/C) (ex SA.32874 (2011/NN)) implemented by Denmark
  (notified under document C(2017) 4461)


   (1
  )

(notified under document C(2017) 4461)

1

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2018/726 of 2 May 2018 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (EUCAP Sahel Niger/1/2018) ( OJ L 122, 17.5.2018 ) | 27 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2018/726 of 2 May 2018 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (EUCAP Sahel Niger/1/2018) ( OJ L 122, 17.5.2018 )

( OJ L 122, 17.5.2018 )

27

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Den on dem. of Tyce *v.*Ledford.

Where a cause had been depending three years in the County, and five years in the Superior Court, and the Plaintiff for the lass three years had been uniformly ready for trial, the Court ordered the Defendant to pay the costs of the Plaintiff’s witnesses during the term as the condition of another continuance.

Defendant made an affidavit in the usual form, that one Davis was a material witness for him ; that lie liad been summoned and did not attend, &c. But on the other side if being alledged, that this cause had been depending three years ip the County Court, where at length the Plaintiff obtained a verdict; that the Defendant then appealed to this Court, where the cause had been depending five years ; that the Plaintiff for the last three years had been uniformly pressing for u trial, and the Defendant delaying it under various pretences; and the act of 1779 being read and insisted on, which directs that where the Judge shall be of opinion that tiie [tarty praying a continuance, ought not to obtain the same without payment of costs, that the Judge may require him to pay the costs of that term before granting the continuance; and that though afterwards he should eventually prevail, that he should not be allowed such costs in the taxatiop of costs. The Court in this ease, Judge WniiiAMS being on the bench, made such order $ and the Defendant before the continuance granted, was required to pay, and did pay the costs of the attendance of all the Plaintiff’s witnesses during the term j and some of the bar requesting' to know if this was intended to be a general rule for the future, the. Judge, answered, no — only for cases circumstanced like the present.

Note. — Vide *Park*v *Cochran & others, post*178.
**EXHIBIT 10.46**

**FIRST AMENDMENT TO**

**AGREEMENT OF SALE**

This First Amendment to Agreement of Sale is dated this          day of December, 2007(“Amendment”), by and between **INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY**, a New York corporation (“Seller”), and **KIRK & BLUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY,**an Ohio corporation (“Purchaser”) under the followingcircumstances: 

A. Seller and Purchaser are parties to that certain Agreement of Sale dated October 19, 2007 (“Agreement”),pursuant to which Seller agreed to sell, and Purchaser agreed to purchase, certain real estate more particularly set forth in the Agreement; and 

B. Seller and Purchaser desire to enter into this Amendment to, among other things, extend the “Due Diligence Period”, and reduce the “Purchase Price”, all upon the terms and conditions contained herein. 

**NOW, THEREFORE,**in consideration of the foregoing premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which ishereby acknowledged, Purchaser and Seller hereby agree as follows: 

1. The number “Four Million Three Hundred Thousand and 00/100Dollars ($4,300,000.00)” contained in Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the number “Four Million One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 ($4,100,000) Dollars”. 

2. The words “sixty (60) days from the date of this Agreement” contained in Section 16(a) of the Agreement are hereby deleted andreplaced with the words “from the date of this Agreement until January 21, 2008”. 

3. Purchaser and Seller each acknowledgeand agree that the Earnest Money Deposit shall remain refundable until expiration of the Due Diligence Period, as such term is amended hereby, without regard to any provision of Section 9 of the Agreement, or any other Section of the Agreement,to the contrary. 

4. Except as amended, modified or altered hereby, the Agreement is not otherwise amended, modified or altered, and eachof the parties hereto ratify, affirm and confirm each and every provision of the Agreement, as amended hereby. 

5. This Amendment may besigned in any number of original, facsimile or electronic counterparts which, when taken together as a whole, shall constitute a single instrument. 

 

1 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written.

 
SELLER:**INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY,**A New York corporationBy: 
/s/ William A. Merrigan
Printed Name: William A. MerriganIts: VP- GSCDPURCHASER:**KIRK & BLUM,** an Ohio corporationBy: 
/s/ Dennis W. Blazer
Printed Name: Dennis BlazerIts: Secretary, Treasurer
 

2