Search

A to Z Index | En Español | Contact Us | FAQs | About OSHA

OSHA Newsletter RSS Feeds

Occupational Safety & Health Administration We Can Help What's New | Offices

Home Workers Regulations Enforcement Data & Statistics Training Publications Newsroom Small Business Anti-Retaliation

 Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents

• Standard Number: 1910.1200(d)

December 1, 1988 

Mr. John Thomas Cooney

Plant Chemist

SUS Chemical Company, Inc.

Post Office Box 10027

Rock Hill, South Carolina 29731

Dear Mr. Cooney: 

This is in response to your letter of September 7, regarding the hazard determination requirements under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's 

(OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200. Please accept by apology for the delay in response. 

Our responses to your questions are numbered in the sequence in which they were posed. 

Question 1: 

If a company chooses not to have their products tested by this method (as stated by 29 CFR 1910.1200), what criteria would determine if a product is classified 

as corrosive on hazard warning labels and MSDS sheets? 

Answer: 

As a chemical manufacturer, importer or employer evaluating chemicals, you are not required to follow any specific test methods stated in 29 CFR 1910.1200 

for the hazard determination. You must, however, be able to demonstrate that the hazards of the chemicals produced or imported have been adequately 

ascertained in accordance with the criteria set forth in Appendix B, Hazard Determination found in 29 CFR 1910.1200. In making the hazard determination you 

are not required to perform chemical testing. The evaluation is to be based on currently available information. You are required to consider all available 

scientific evidence concerning the hazard of a chemical in addition to consulting the floor reference sources, listed in paragraph (d)(3) of the standard. These 

are 29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart Z, Toxic and Hazardous Substances, OSHA; and Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents in the Work

Environment, ACGIH. Additional information sources to evaluate the hazards associated with the chemicals are listed in Appendix C to 29 CFR 1910.1200. 

Question 2: 

Would pH measurements define corrosivity of that product or would there be other test methods? 

Answer: 

The pH is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution. Although pH is a characteristic of a corrosive liquid, it would not define corrosivity, as a corrosive 

material can be liquid or solid. Titanium tetrachloride is an example of a solid corrosive material. To make a thorough and defensible hazard determination, not 

only pH but all relevant data available must be examined. 

Question 3: 

Should other labels such as "CAUTION IRRITANT" be used in place of "CORROSIVE?" 

Answer: 

An irritant is a chemical, which is not corrosive, but which causes a reversible inflammatory effect on living tissue by chemical action at the site of contact. If the 

evidence available on a chemical indicates it is an irritant hazard rather than corrosive, the appropriate hazard warning must be used. The hazard warning must 

convey the hazard of the chemical and the target organ effects, when such information is available (i.e., eye irritant or skin irritant). 

We hope this information is helpful to you. If we can be of further assistance to you, please contact us again. 

Sincerely, 

Directorate of Compliance Programs 

Was this page helpful?

12/01/1988 - Hazard determination criteria for corrosive liquids. Page 1 of 2

https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=19724 6/10/2015
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy & Security Statement | Disclaimers | Important Web Site Notices | International | Contact Us

U.S. Department of Labor | Occupational Safety & Health Administration | 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20210

Telephone: 800-321-OSHA (6742) | TTY

www.OSHA.gov

 Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents

12/01/1988 - Hazard determination criteria for corrosive liquids. Page 2 of 2

https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=19724 6/10/2015