**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 
**NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration**  **Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart**  **CCC ) (Renewal)** 
**1. Identification of the Information Collection 1(a) Title of the Information Collection**  NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC) (Renewal ), EPA ICR Number 1821.08 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0419

. **1(b) Short Characteriza tion/Abstract**  The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the regulations published at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC were proposed on September 18, 1997, promulgated on June 22, 1999, and amended on September 19, 2012

. The 2012 Residual Risk and Technology

(RTR) review deemed the risk under the existing rule to be acceptable, but eliminated an alternative compliance option for acid regeneration facilities to establish their own site

- specific emission limits, removed exemption during startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM), and required certain performance test reports to be submitted electronically

. This rule applies to all facilities that pickle steel using h ydrochloric acid or regenerate hydrochloric acid, and are e ither major sources or part of a facility that is a major source. This regulation does not appl y to any pickling line that uses an acid other than hydrochloric acid or an acid solution containing either less than 6 percent hydrochloric acid (HCl) or at a temperature less than 100 **°** F. New facilities include th ose that commenced construction or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC. In general, all NESHAP stand ards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of an y startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility , or any period during which the monitoring sy stem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority . In the event that there is no such delegated authorit y, the reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of 1.14 affected facilities at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the2

owner/operator of the plant site). Over the next three ye ars, an average of 100 respondents (95 steel pickling and 5 acid regeneratio n facilities) per y ear will be subject to the standard , and no additional respondents per ye ar will become subject to the standard. The Office of Management and Budget ( OMB ) approved the currentl y active I CR without any “ Terms of Clearance ”

. All of th e steel pickling, HCl process facilities and hydrochloric acid regeneration plants in the United States are owned and operated b y the steel pickling, HCl process facilities and the hydrochloric acid regeneration industry (the “Affected Public”). None of the facilities in the United States are owned by state, local, tribal or the Federal government. They are all privatel y owned, for

- profit businesses. The burden to the “Affected Public” may be found in Table 1 : Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC) (Renewal)

. T he burden to the “Federal Government” burden is attributed entirely to work performed by

federal employ ees or government contrac tor s and may be found in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC) (Renewal)

. **2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need**  **/Authority for the Collection** The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. Inaddition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; ( F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administr ator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment , hydrochloric acid emi ssions from continuous and batch3

pickling l ines and acid regeneration units, and chlorine emissions from acid regeneration units cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP were promulgated for this source cate gory at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which w ere promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s initial capability to comp ly

with the emission standard . Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all t imes. During the performance test a record of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor. The notificat ions required in the standard are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to che ck if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated , leaks are being detected and repaired , and the standard s are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, id entify problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations. **3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria** The requested recordkeeping an d reporting are required under 40 CFR Part 63, Subp art CCC. **3(a) Nonduplication** If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, no dup lication exists. **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB** An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Register ( 79 FR 30117 ) on May 27 , 2014

. No comments were received on the4

burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations** The Agency

has consulted i ndustry

experts and internal data sources to project the number of affected facilities and industry growth over the next three ye ars. The primary source of information as reported by industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO), which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compl iance. ECHO is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data. The industry size is based on EPA’s estimates obtained during the development of the 2012 RTR.
Industry trade associations and other interested partie s were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being developed and the standard has been previously

reviewed to determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes. In developing this I CR, we co ntacted the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) at (202) 452

- 7122 and the Steel Manufacturers Association at (202) 296

- 1515. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitt ed in response to the f irst Federal Register n otice. In this case, no comments were received. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection** Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likel y. **3(e) General Guidelines**
T hese reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR Part 1320, Section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five ye ar records retention re quirement is consistent with the Part 70 permit program and the five ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. T he retention of records for five years allow s EPA to establish the compliance history of a source , an y pattern of non - c ompliance and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records

.5

**3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confi dentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended b y 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions**
T he reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes**  The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are steel pickling, HCl process facilities, and h ydrochloric acid regeneration plants. The United States Standard Industrial Classification ( SI C ) code s for the respondents affected b y the standards , and the corresponding North American Industry Classification Sy stem (NAICS ) codes are shown below.

**Standard (40 CFR**  **P art 6**  **3 ,**  **S ubpart**  **CCC )**  **SIC Codes NAICS Codes**  Steel Works, Blast Furnaces (including Coke Ovens), and Rolling Mills (except coke ovens not integrated with steel mills) 3312 331111
Rolled Steel Shape Manufacturing 3312 31221 Steel Wiredrawing and Steel Nails and Spikes (steel, wire drawing) 3315 331222 Cold

- Rolled Steel Sheet, Strip and Bars 3316 331221 Steel Pipes and Tubes 3317 33121

**4(b) Information Requested (i) Data Items** 
In this ICR , all the data that is recorded or reported is required by the NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC)

. A source must make the following reports:6

**Notification s**  Notification when an area source subsequentl y becomes subject to the rule requirements 63.9(b)(1), 63.1163(a)(1) Notification of rule applicability 63.9(a)(2), 63.1163(a)(2) Notification and application of construction or reconstruction 63.9(b)(3

- 4), 63.1163(a)(3

- 4) Notification and application of intent to construct a new affected source 63.9(b)(5), 63.1163(a)(5) Request for an extension of compliance 63.1163(b) Notification that the source is subject to special compliance requirements 63.1163(c) Notification of performance tests 63.7(b), 63.9(e), 63.1163(d) Notification of ph ys ical or operational change which may increase the emission rate N/A Notification of compliance status 63.9(h), 63.1163(e)
**Reports** Report of performance test results 63.10(d)(2), 63.1164(a), Demonstration of continuous monitoring sy stem, if applicable 63.9(g) Progress reports, if applicable 63.6(i), 63.1164(b) Semiannual report including reporting of malfunctions 63.10(d)(5)(1), 63.1164(c) A source must keep the following records:
**Recordkeeping** Occurrence and duration of malfunctions and an y maintenance performed on the air pollution control equipment 63.10(b)(2), 63.1165(a) (1)

- (4) All measurements needed to demonstrate compliance with the standard 63.1165(a)(5) Initial and subsequent performance test results 63.1165(a)(6) Emission test results and other data needed to demonstrate a source is meeting waiver requirements 61.13(g), 63.1165(a)(7)7 **Recordkeeping** All reports , notifications , and applicability determination 63.9, 63.10(b), 63.1165(a) (9)

- (10) Records for sources with continuous monitoring systems 63.10(3) Records are required to be retained for five years 63.1165(a

- c) Electronic Reporting Some of the r espondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordke eping at a plant site. The 2012 amendment requires facilities to submit electronic copies of required performance test reports to EPA’s WebFIRE database through an electronic emissions test report structure called the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). The requirement to submit performance test data electronicall y to EPA applies only to those performance tests conducted using test methods that are supported by the ERT. **(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities** Familiarization with the regulatory requirements. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate s ys tems for the measurement of process gas temperature, excess air proportion, make

- up water flow, and recirculation flow rate for web scrubbers or other parameters established during the performance test for an alternative control device. Perform initial performance test, Reference Method 1, 2, 3, 4 and 26 test s , and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required t o be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and8 **Respondent Activities** providing information. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities** EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analy sis, storage, and distribution of the required information.
**Agency Activities** Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in Integrated Compliance Information System (I CI S) and ECHO. **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are p roperl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source ’ s initial capability to compl y with the emission standard, and note the operating conditions under which compliance was achi eved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for complianc e determinations.
In formation contained in the reports is reported b y state and local governments in the IC IS Air database which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. IC IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retriev al of compliance data for industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses IC IS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five9

ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** A majority

of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the ty pes of control equipment employed, the recordk eeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larg er businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown in below Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC) (Renewal )

. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paper work Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it display s a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 35, 100 ( Total L abor Hours from Table 1). T hese hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency

knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously approved ICR, and an y comments received. **6(b) Est imating Respondent Costs**  **(i) Estimating Labor Costs** This I CR uses the following labor rates:10 Managerial $ 129

. 93 ($ 61.87 + 110%) Technical $ 103

. 97 ($ 49.51 + 110%) Clerical $ 5 1

. 79 ($2 4

. 66 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2014 , “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 pe rcent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs** The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activ ities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. Th e capital/startup costs are one

- time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor(s) and other costs su ch as photocop ying and postage.

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**
**Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs** (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F)
Flow

- meters with high/low alarms $830 0 $0 $106 100 $10,600
TO TAL $0 $10,600 The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are zero . This is the total o f column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance ( O&M) costs for this I CR are $ 10,600

. This is the total of column G. The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $ 10,600

. These are recordkeeping costs. **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost**  The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program i ncludes activities such as the examination of records maint ained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of11

emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three y ears of the ICR is estimated to be $ 25, 000

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $ 6 2. 90 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 9.31 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 67 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 2 9

. 17 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5. 25 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 78 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 20 1 4 General Schedule , which excludes locality

rates of pay

. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees
. Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cos t

– NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC) (Renewal )

. **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 100 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that no additional respondents per ye ar will become subject. The overall average number of r espondents, as shown in the table below, is 100 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR.12 **Number of Respondents** Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 0 100 0 0 100
2 0 100 0 0 100
3 0 100 0 0 100 Average 0 100 0 0 100 1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities. C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 100

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table:

**Total Annual Responses**  (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D
Notification of applicability 0 1 0 0 Notification of construction/reconstruction 0 1 0 0 Notification of anticipated startup 0 1 0 0 Notification of actual startup 0 1 0 0 Notification of special compliance requirements 0 1 0 0 Notification of initial performance test 0 1 0 0 Notification of compliance status 0 1 0 0 Waiver application 0 1 0 0 Report of performance test 0 1 0 013

**Total Annual Responses**  Report of monitoring exceedances 20 2 0 40 Report of no excess emissions 80 2 0 160
Total 200 The number of Total Annual Responses is 200. The total annual labor costs are $3,5 30,000

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC) (Renewal )

. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectivel y, and summarized below. **(i) Respond ent Tally**  The total annual labor hours are 35, 100

. Details regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC) (Renewal )

. We assume that burdens for managerial tasks take 5% of the time required for technical tasks because the ty pical tasks for managers are to review and approve reports. Clerical burdens are assumed to take 10% of the time required for technical tasks because the ty pical duties of clerical staff are to proofread the reports, make copies and maintain records. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to averag e 175 hours per response

. The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $10,600

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs. **(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three y ears is estimated to be 552 labor hours at a cost of $25, 000 . See Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC) (Renewal )

. We assume that burdens for managerial tasks take 5% of the time required for technical tasks because the ty pical tasks for managers are to review and approve reports. Clerical burdens are assumed to take 10 % of the time required for technical14

tasks because the ty

pical duties of clerical staff are to proofread the reports, make copies and maintain records.
**6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** The increase in burden and cost from the most recently approve d ICR is due to an adjustment

. Itis not due to any program changes. During the 2012 RTR, EPA did not add additional requirements, other than report ing performance test results through the WebFIRE interface if the test methods used are those supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). However, we updated the estimated average number of respondents subject to Subpart CCC from 72 to 100. The increase in the number of facilities results in an overall increase in the respondent and Agency

burden and in O&M costs. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 175 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it display s a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15. To comment on the Agency 's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any su ggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 201 4

- 0064

. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access thos e documents in the public docket that are available electronically

. When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance D ocket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holiday s . The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 1927

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of15

In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2014

- 0064 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0419 in any correspondence. **Part B of the Supporting Statement** This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.16

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Proces**  **s Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC)**  **(Renewal)**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) Person**  **hours per occurrence**  **No. of**

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **Person**

**hours per respondent**  **per year (C=AxB)**  **Respondents**

**per year a**  **Technical**

**person**   ** hours per** **year (E=CxD)**  **Managem ent** 

**person hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) Clerical** 

**person hours per**  **year (Ex0.1)**  **Total Cost per**

**year b** 

1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting requirements A. Read instructions 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 $0 B. Required activities Initial performance test 125 1 125 0 0 0 0 $0 Repeat performance test c 125 1 125 0 0 0 0 $0 Annual performance test d, e 125 1 125 100 12 , 500 625 1250 $1,445,568.75 Startup, shutdown, malfunction plan 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 Maintenance plan 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 Maintenance plan revision f 40 1 40 10 400 20 40 $46,258.20 C. Create information See 3B D. Gather existing information See 3B E. Write Report Notification of applicability g 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of construction/reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of anticipated startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of special compliance requirements N/A Notification of performance test 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $017

Notification of compliance status 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 $0 NESHAP w aiver application h N/A Report of performance test See 3B Report of monitoring exceedances i 16 2 32 20 640 32 64 $74,013.12 Report of no excess emissions j 8 2 16 80 1280 64 128 $148,026.24 **Subtotal for Reporting** 17,043 $1,713,866.31 4. Recordkeeping requirements A. Read instructions See 3B B. Plan activities N/A C. Implement Activities N/A D. Develop record system N/A E. Time to enter information Records of all information required by standards k 3 52 156 100 15600 780 1560 $1,804,069.80 F. Time to train personnel 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 $0 G. Time to adjust existing ways to comply with previously applicable requirements N/A
H. Time to transmit or disclose information l 0.25 3 0.75 100 75 3.75 7.5 $8,673.41 I. Time for audits N/A **Subtotal for Recordkeeping** 18 , 026 $1,812,743.21 **TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded) 35,069**  **$3,526,610** Capital & O&M $10,600 **Grand TOTAL $3,537,210** 
**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that there are approximately 100 respondents subject to the standard. We have further assumed that no addi tional respondent per year will become subject to the regulation in the next three years. We have further assumed that all exist ing sources are in compliance with the regulation since the compliance date of this rule h as passed and no additional requirements , other than electronic reporting of performance test results, were added under the 2012 RTR amendment

. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $129.93 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $103.97 per h our for Technical labor, and $51.79 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bur eau of Labor Statistics, June 2014 “Table 12: Civilian workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 p ercent to account for the benefit18

packages available to those em ploy ed by

private industry. c We have assumed that each new respondent will be required to conduct an initial performance test and will not have to repeat this test. d We have assumed that it will take 125 hours for each respondent to complete the annual performance test and report. e Each of the respondents are required to conduct an annual performance test to either measure the HCl mass flows at the contro l device i nlet and outlet or the concentration of HCl exiting the control device and report the results in the semiannual reports or through the WebFIRE interface if the test methods use d are those supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT)

. f We have assume d that 10 percent of respondents must w rite a revised maintenance plan. g We have assumed that all new sources will be required to meet initial notification requirements. h We have assumed that no respondent will request a NESHAP waiver application. i W e have assumed that 20 percent of respondents will report excess emissions on a semiannual basis. j We have assumed that 80 percent of respondents will report no excess emissions on a semiannual basis. k We have assumed that each respondent will take thr ee hours each week to record all information required by the standard. l We have assumed that each respondent will take 15 minutes three times per year to transmit or disclose information. Note: Figures may not add up exactly due to rounding.19

**Table 2:**  **Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid**  **Regeneration Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCC) (Renewal)** 

**Activity (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) EPA**  **person**   ** hours per** **occurrence No. of** 

**occurrences per plant**  **per year EPA** 

**person**   ** hours per** **plant per year**  **(C=AxB) Plants per** 

**year a**  **Technical**

**person -**  **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) Managem**  **ent**

**person -**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) Clerical** 

**person -**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) Cost, $**  **b**

Report Review **New Sources** Notification of applicability 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of construction/ reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of special compliance requirements N/A Notification of performance test 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of compliance status 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Review of performance test report 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 $0 Review of repeat test report 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 $0 **Existing Sources** Review of excess emissions report c 4 2 8 20 160 8 16 $8,374.40 Review of no excess emissions report d 2 2 4 80 320 16 32 $16,748.80
Review of waiver application e 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Subtotals Labor Burden and cost 480 24 48 $25,123.20 **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)**  **552 $25,123** 20

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that there are approximately 100 respondents subject to the standard. We have further assumed that no additional respondent per year will become subject to the regulation in the next three years. We have further assumed that all existi ng sources are in compliance with the regulation since the compliance date of this rule as passed and no additional requirements, other than electronic reporting of performance test results, were added under the 2012 RTR am endment

. b This cost is based on the following hourly labor rates times a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: $62. 90 for Managerial (GS

- 13, Step 5), $46.67 for Technical (GS

- 12, Step 1) and $25.25 Clerical (GS

- 6, Step 3). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2014 General Schedule”, which excludes locality rates of pay.
c We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents will report excess emissions on a semiannual basis d We have assumed that 80 percent of respondents will report no excess emissions on a semiannual basis.
e We have assumed that no waiver application is expected. Note: Figures may not add up exactly due to rounding.