alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of ACMAT Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael P. Cifone,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

                                                 /s/ MICHAEL P. CIFONE
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                    Michael P. Cifone
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

March 27, 2003

                                        71
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 516 

Relative to the death of Pat Summitt, head coach emeritus of the University 

of Tennessee women’s basketball team. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2016 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mr. CORKER, and Ms. MIKULSKI) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Relative to the death of Pat Summitt, head coach emeritus 

of the University of Tennessee women’s basketball team. 

Whereas coaching was the great passion of Pat Summitt’s 

life and was an opportunity for her to work with studentathletes, help student-athletes discover their true potentials, and change the lives of the young women she 

coached; 

Whereas Pat Summitt won 8 National Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘NCAA’’) 

championships, received National Coach of the Year honors 7 times over her career, and was recognized as the 

Naismith Women’s Collegiate Coach of the Century in 

2000; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 516 ATS 

Whereas Pat Summitt won the Gold Medal in the 1984 Summer Olympics as the head coach of the United States 

women’s national basketball team; 

Whereas the last team at the University of Tennessee that 

Pat Summitt coached finished the season with an overall 

record of 27–9, winning a Southeastern Conference Tournament Championship and earning a spot in the Elite 

Eight in the NCAA Women’s Division I Basketball 

Championship in Iowa; 

Whereas Pat Summitt, who had more wins than any other 

basketball coach, male or female, in NCAA history, concluded her coaching career after 38 seasons at the University of Tennessee on April 18, 2012; 

Whereas Pat Summitt also worked off the court, holding a 

graduation record of 100 percent for all members of the 

University of Tennessee women’s basketball team who 

completed their eligibility at the University of Tennessee 

during Coach Summitt’s tenure; 

Whereas Pat Summitt announced on August 23, 2011, that 

she had been diagnosed with early onset dementia, Alzheimer’s type; 

Whereas later in November 2011, Coach Summitt announced 

the Pat Summitt Foundation, which helps provide funding and research for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia; 

and 

Whereas, on May 29, 2012, President Barack Obama awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor of the United States, to Pat Summitt for her 

remarkable career as an unparalleled figure in women’s 

team sports and for her courage in speaking out openly 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 516 ATS 

and courageously about her battle with early onset dementia, Alzheimer’s type: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Senate has heard with profound sorrow 

3 and deep regret the announcement of the death of 

4 Pat Summitt, head coach emeritus of the University 

5 of Tennessee women’s basketball team; and 

6 (2) the Senate instructs the Secretary of the 

7 Senate communicate these resolutions to the House 

8 of Representatives and transmit an enrolled copy 

9 thereof to the family of the deceased. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6660

RONALD MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD JONES, Superintendent, Piedmont Correctional Institution; SHIELA THOMPSON, Programmer, Piedmont Correctional Institution;

FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Secretary of Department of

Corrections; LYNN PHILLIPS, Director of

Prisons,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-95-728-4)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Moore, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Moore v. Jones,

No. CA-95-728-4 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

 

# **CERTIFICATION**

 

The undersigned certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C.  1350, that:

 

(1)          The accompanying Report on Form 10-Q fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the accompanyingReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                      | Canterbury Park Holding Corporation         |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                        |
| Dated:  May 15, 2003 | /s/ Randall D. Sampson                      |   |
|                      | Randall D. Sampson,                         |
|                      | President, and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                      |                                        |
| Dated:  May 15, 2003 | /s/ David C. Hansen                         |   |
|                      | David C. Hansen,                            |
|                      | Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer |
|                           |                                             |  |  |

 

----
SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION

I, Daniel
Clozza, certify that:

I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 20-F of Forum National Investments Ltd.;

Based on my
knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report;

The company's other
certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

Designed such
internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Evaluated the
effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual
report based on such evaluations; and

Disclosed in
this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
companys internal control over financial reporting: and

The company's
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

All significant
deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal
control of financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.

|Date:
  April 26, 2011 | /s/
  Daniel Clozza                                  
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                       | Daniel
  Clozza, Chief Executive Officer and Director

---
**Exhibit 31(f)2**

**SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Kirby R. Willis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Savannah Electric and Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 27, 2006

                    /s/Kirby R. Willis                    

Kirby R. Willis

Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer

and Assistant Corporate Secretary
1

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Helen Mayfield v. Capital One, National Association

Appellate case number: 01-18-00762-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-48720

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Helen Mayfield, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final 

summary judgment order. On March 16, 2018, the trial court signed an order sustaining 

appellee Capital One, National Association’s contest to Mayfield’s affidavit of inability 

to pay and requiring her to pay “all court costs, including filing fees” by March 23, 2018. 

On July 16, 2018, the trial court ordered Mayfield, in part, “to pay the Harris County 

District Clerk $556.00 for the unpaid filing fees and court costs incurred thus far in this 

case” by August 17, 2018. After she filed her notice of appeal, Mayfield filed, in the trial 

court, a motion for a free appellate record and an “Affidavit of Inability to Pay Filing 

Fees on Appeal, Free Clerk and Reporter’s Record.” See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (b). 

Capitol One filed a response to Mayfield’s motion. Cf. id. 145(f)(1). However, a partial 

clerk’s record filed in this appeal does not reflect that the trial court has signed any order 

regarding Mayfield’s most recent affidavit of inability to pay. See id. 145(f)(5), (6), (7). 

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court to 

determine whether appellant must pay the cost of preparation of the appellate 

record, according to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145.1 See id.

The trial court clerk is directed to prepare and file a clerk’s record containing any 

additional filings, trial court orders, or findings related to Mayfield’s “Affidavit of 

Inability to Pay Filing Fees on Appeal, Free Clerk and Reporter’s Record.” The court

reporter is directed to prepare and file a reporter’s record of any hearing related to a

Mayfield’s “Affidavit of Inability to Pay Filing Fees on Appeal, Free Clerk and 

 

1 Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 governs payment of fees for preparation of the clerk’s and 

reporter’s records. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(c) (defining “costs” to include clerk’s and court 

reporter’s fees for preparation of appellate record); TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(a) (“In this rule, ‘costs’ 

mean filing fees charged by the appellate court. Fees charged for preparation of the appellate 

record are governed by [Rule] 145.”).
2

Reporter’s Record.” The clerk’s record and reporter’s record are due to be filed no later 

than 30 days from the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated when the requested records are filed in this 

appeal.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __January 17, 2019___
# C_2014202EN.01000501.xml

| 30.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — Bimbo SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Panrico SA

(Case C-591/12 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the word mark BIMBO DOUGHNUTS - Earlier Spanish word mark DOGHNUTS - Relative grounds for refusal - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion - Independent distinctive role of one element of a composite word mark))

2014/C 202/06

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Bimbo SA (represented by: C. Prat, abogado, and R. Ciullo, Barrister)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents), Panrico SA (represented by: D. Pellisé Urquiza, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012 in Case T-569/10 Bimbo SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment brought by the applicant for the word mark ‘BIMBO DOUGHNUTS’ for goods in Class 30 against the decision R 838/2009-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 7 October 2010 dismissing the action against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing registration of that mark in opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the international and national word marks ‘DONUT’, ‘DOGHNUTS’ and ‘DONUTS’ and the international and national figurative marks containing the word ‘donuts’ for goods in Class 30 — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion

Bimbo SA

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Bimbo SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bimbo SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.

1

---
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE BONUS AGREEMENT



 Exhibit 10.5 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE BONUS AGREEMENT 
 (DTAC and DTAG) 

This Amendment is effective as of the 1st day of January, 2009 by and among DT Acceptance Corporation
(“DTAC”) and DriveTime Automotive Group, Inc. (“DTAG”) (collectiveIy, the “Company”) and Al Appelman (the “Employee”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. The Company and Employee are parties to an
Executive Bonus Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2005 (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which the Employee replaced certain benefits under an Executive Sale Participation Plan, dated January 1, 2004 with certain payments following the
Payment Date as set forth in the Agreement. 
 B. The Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement on the
terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment. 
 In consideration of the premises and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Defined Terms. Unless otherwise specified herein, all capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the same meaning given to such terms in the Agreement. 

2. Amendment to Section 3 of the Agreement. Effective as of January 1, 2009, Section of the
Agreement is amended to delete the current table in the section and replace it as follows: 
  

				
	 Date of Contribution
	  	Amount of Contribution
	 May 1, 2006
	  	$	400,000
	 May 1, 2007
	  	$	400,000
	 May 1, 2008
	  	$	400,000
	 May 1, 2009
	  	$	200,000
	 May 1, 2010
	  	$	200,000
	 May 1, 2011
	  	$	400,000

 3.
Amendment to Section 6(e)(iii). Effective as of January 1, 2009, “2010” in Section 6(e)(iii) shall be changed to 2011. 
 4. Payment Date Distributions. For purposes of clarity under Section 6(b) of the Agreement, in calculating the first payment to Employee beginning on the first anniversary of the Payment Date
(May 1, 2011) the amounts allocated to the Employee’s Account shall include the May 1, 2011 contribution under Section 3. 
 5. Heading. The paragraph headings contained in this Amendment are for convenience of reference only and shall not be considered a part of this Amendment in any respect. 

6. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Arizona. 
 7. Execution in Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts
and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

[Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 








			
	 DRIVETIME AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Jon Ehlinger

	 Its:
	 	 Secretary

	
	 DT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Jon Ehlinger

	 Its:
	 	 Secretary

	
	 /s/ Al Appelman

	 Al Appelman

		
	 Date:
	 	 4/3/09



  

 2