alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ALsTON&BIRD UP

One Atlantic Center

1201 West Peachtree Street

Atlanta, GA 30309-3424

404-881-7000

Fax:404-881-7m

www.alston.com

Charles H Morgan Direct Dial: 404-881-71Jfl

August 5, 2008

E-mail: charlie.morgan@alston.com

Via UPS and Facsimile (202-606-5050)

Mr. Ray H. Darling

Executive Secretary

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

1120 20th Street, NW

Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

Re: Imperial Sugar Company,' Imperial-Savannah, L.P.,

OSHRC Docket No. 08-1104, OSHA Inspection No. 310988712

Dear Mr. Darling:

Enclosed is a copy ofthe completed form posted today notifying the

Respondent's employees ofthe notice of contest and their rights under the Review

Commission's Rules of Procedure.

Please let me know if you have questions. Thank you.

cOD-~. Charles H. Morgan

CHt\.1:chm

Enclosure

cc: Karen E. Mock, Esq. (via facsimile)

Christopher D. Helms, Esq. (via facsimile)

Matthe\\' J. Gilligan, Esq.

LEGAL02/30903934v2

. -------------- Atlanta. Charlotte. Dallas. New York. Research Triangle· Silicon Valley. Washington, D.C.
," ;

t'- o • ••••• :

" ,

"0

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTII REVIEW COMMISSION

DOCKET NO: ()Y-IIa/f

aV&~JIf.5 c. S/1~t:'J t .0 115 r

PIe- PrirJt~IJfgrllt~ N- '

C-oI<,4ae4--""~ srtr.e-ry Tf/{6R. ~/Apl\ntk I

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES REGARDING

SAFFIY AND HEALTH CITATIONS

7

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

I certify tb2t the Employer's Notice ofContest in the above case and the Notice to Employees infonning them

of their right to participate in a proceeding before the Review Commission have been posted at each place

where the OSHA cit2tion is required to be posted. I further certify that copies of both notices were also mailed

or personally delivered to the following Authorized Employee Representative(s) [Union(s)J of the affected

employees:

"I

!

:-!,

,

,

J

Your employer has been cited by the Secrewy ofLabor for violation ofthe Occupational Safety and

Health Act of 1970. The citation bas been contested and will be the subject of a hearing befure a

Review Commission Administrative Law Judge. Affected employees are entided to participate in

this hearing as parties Wider the Commission's Rules of Procedure. A copy ofthe Guide to Review

Commission Procedures has been provided to your employer ifyou need information on this process.

Notice ofintent to participate must be filed with the Commission no later than 10 days before the

hearing and should be sent to the fullowing address:

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

1120 20d'Street, NW- N"mth Floor, Washington, DC 20036-3457

All papers relewnt to this matter may be inspected at:

()d?'(~ 51j-<E".s' $ a·P.h~E (jAY1iV~I/H fo~JteI'? ~eF.v6ley J EmpI~ Fill in location ofreleVlUltJMPCC'S in me space"~,.e befOre posting this aotfCe.

" "j

\/;;¥/0;~1i

Please caD (202) 606-5400 ifyou have anyestions about Review COnmUssion rocedures.

t

'f..."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.2

                                 AMENDMENT TO
                                PLUG POWER INC.
                     1999 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Section 3(a) is replaced in its entirety with the following:

Stock Issuable. The maximum number of shares of Stock reserved and available for
issuance under the Plan shall be 6,128,632 shares of Stock plus, as of the first
day of each January and July, commencing July 1, 2001, 16.4 percent of any net
increase since the preceding July 1 or January 1, as the case may be, in the
total number of shares of Stock actually outstanding; plus shares of Stock
underlying awards under the Plug Power, L.L.C. Membership Option Plan which are
forfeited, cancelled, reacquired by the Company, satisfied without the issuance
of Stock or otherwise terminated (other than be exercise) from time to time.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum number of shares of Stock for which
Incentive Stock Options may be issued under the Plan shall not exceed 4,561,002.
For purposes of this limitation, the shares of Stock underlying any Awards which
are forfeited, cancelled, reacquired by the Company, satisfied without the
issuance of Stock or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) shall be
added back to the shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan. Subject
to such overall limitation, shares of Stock may be issued up to such maximum
number pursuant to any type or types of Award; provided, however, that from and
after the date the Company becomes subject to the provisions of Section 162(m)
of the Code, Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with respect to no more
than 500,000 shares of Stock may be granted to any one individual participant
during any one calendar year period. The shares available for issuance under the
Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of Stock or shares of Stock
reacquired by the Company and held in its treasury.
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket No. 13-1458

LONGHORN SERVICE COMPANY,

Respondent.

REMAND ORDER

Before: ATTWOOD, Chairman; and MACDOUGALL, Commissioner.

BY THE COMMISSION:

This case is before the Commission on remand from the United States Court of Appeals 

for the Tenth Circuit. Longhorn Service Co. v. Perez, No. 15-9554, 2016 WL 3397714 (10th

Cir. June 14, 2016). On appeal by Respondent, the court reviewed a decision of Administrative 

Law Judge John H. Schumacher. Longhorn Service Co., 25 BNA OSHC 1572 (No. 13-1458, 

2015). By mandate issued August 8, 2016, the court has remanded the case to the Commission

to vacate Citation 1, Item 2A and to enter a separate penalty for Citation 1, Item 2B. We, in turn,

remand this case to the judge for further proceedings consistent with the court’s opinion. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/

Cynthia L. Attwood

Chairman

/s/

Heather L. MacDougall

Dated: September 20, 2016 Commissioner
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 213 (Monday, November 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 87717-87718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0259]


Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered 
Aviation Employees for the Period of January 1, 2025, Through December 
31, 2025

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has determined that the minimum random drug and 
alcohol testing percentage rates for the period January 1, 2025, 
through December 31, 2025, will remain at 25 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random

[[Page 87718]]

drug testing and 10 percent of safety-sensitive employees for random 
alcohol testing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicky Dunne, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, 
Program Policy Branch; Email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2541575042444744514048404b51654344440b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90f4e2e5f7f1f2f1e4f5fdf5fee4d0f6f1f1bef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>; Telephone (202) 
267-8442.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Discussion: Pursuant to 14 CFR 120.109(b), the FAA Administrator's 
decision on whether to change the minimum annual random drug testing 
rate is based on the reported random drug test positive rate for the 
entire aviation industry. If the reported random drug test positive 
rate is less than 1.00%, the Administrator may continue the minimum 
random drug testing rate at 25%. In 2023, the random drug test positive 
rate was 0.881%. Therefore, the minimum random drug testing rate will 
remain at 25% for calendar year 2025.
    Similarly, 14 CFR 120.217(c), requires the decision on the minimum 
annual random alcohol testing rate to be based on the random alcohol 
test violation rate. If the violation rate remains less than 0.50%, the 
Administrator may continue the minimum random alcohol testing rate at 
10%. In 2023, the random alcohol test violation rate was 0.141%. 
Therefore, the minimum random alcohol testing rate will remain at 10% 
for calendar year 2025.
    If you have questions about how the annual random testing 
percentage rates are determined, please refer to the Code of Federal 
Regulations Title 14, section 120.109(b) (for drug testing), and 
120.217(c) (for alcohol testing).

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Susan Northrup,
Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. 2024-25569 Filed 11-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of A.S.V., Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas R. Karges,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and results of
                 operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ Thomas R. Karges
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas R. Karges
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        November 7, 2003
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140680

PATRICK J. DEVLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140680 COA: 287827 Ingham CC: 08-000769-AW ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit32**

 

# **CERTIFICATION**

# ** **

Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Canterbury ParkHolding Corporation (the “Company”) herby certify that:

 

(1)   Theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2007fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|                      | **CANTERBURY  PARK HOLDING CORPORATION**     |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                         |
| Dated: November 14,  2007 | /s/ Randall D. Sampson                       |   |
|                      | Randall D. Sampson,                          |
|                      | President, and Chief  Executive Officer      |
|                      |                                         |
| Dated: November 14,  2007 | /s/ David C. Hansen                          |   |
|                      | David C. Hansen,                             |
|                      | Vice President, and  Chief Financial Officer |
|                           |                                              |  |  |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Billy
F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
June 11, 2004
 21
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<CAPTION>

<ARTICLE>  7
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET  AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF FIRST SUNAMERICA LIFE
INSURANCE  COMPANY'S  FORM  10-Q  FOR  THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>          1,260,273,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                     0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                       0
<EQUITIES>                                0
<MORTGAGE>                      204,303,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                             0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                1,483,772,000
<CASH>                           13,440,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                        0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>          130,731,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2,053,893,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>               1,392,618,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                       0
<POLICY-OTHER>                            0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                     0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMON>                          3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                      181,404,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2,053,893,000
<PREMIUMS>                                0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>              54,406,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                 (577,000)
<OTHER-INCOME>                    4,339,000
<BENEFITS>                       34,898,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>      10,800,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                168,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  10,049,000
<INCOME-TAX>                      4,155,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               5,894,000
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      5,894,000
<EPS-BASIC>                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                            0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                       0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                         0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                        0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                          0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                           0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                   0







</TABLE>
14910-I3-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANS10RTATION Federal Aviation Administration 

### L.<0-.

~oum,G S'-MBOl DATE i

# o/L.LI", ACTION: Final rule. RlN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airous Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, an I INI'rIM,SISIG -243F Airplanes, Model A330-3

# j;OO Selies Airplanes, and Model A340-200, A340-300, DAT~- A340-500, and A340-600 Serie Airplanes 

### \0 i."l Q 

### j OUTIN ""MOO. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTranSpOliation [Docket No. FAA-2010-0675; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-061-AD; Amendme 

# IIPSDI ;i..3-IJ.1 39-*****; AD 2010-**-**) 14CFRPart 39

(DOT).

DATE

NlTlAL'''''G "(lUriNG 'YMBDL SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthmess directive (AD) forthe products lis I,\I~"'SIG above. This AD results from 

### mlctatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) ATE I ongmated by an aviatlon authority ofanother country to Identify and correct an unsafe kQUllNGSYM!lOl

.. I
. ~~ conditIOn on an aVIatIOnproduC1" The MeAl descnbes the unsafe condlhon as. DAI E 

### * 

## * *1 

### * '" * * ROlITJN[] sYMBOl. Investigation conducted 

# Py Tha1es

### on

## *** probes revealed oil residue between the stator and the rotor parts ofthe AoA [angle ofattack] vane position resolvers. This 6il residue was due to incorrect cleaning of the machining oil during thelmanufacturing process ofthe AoA resolvers. At low temperatures, this oi~Tesiduebecomes viscous (typically in cruise) causing lag ofAoA vane movement. Such condition could IJd to discrepant AoA measurement. Ifnot conceted, and iftv.'o ort~ee AoA probes were simultaneously affected and provided \\/fong indications ofthe AoA to a similar extent, itcould lead to alate activation dfthe angle of attack protection, which in
Exhibit
10.14


 


Oil Production Equipment and
Facilities Purchase Agreement


 


Party A: Tianjin New Highland
Technology Development Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Hebei Dao Fu Petroleum
Exploration Technology Development Co., Ltd.


 


After mutual consultations between
the Parties, the Parties have agreed to the following terms regarding the
business transaction on oil extraction equipment and facilities:


 


1. According to production
requirements, Party A has, during the period of November 25, 2005 through December 31,
2006, procured and installed the oil field equipment and facilities necessary
to petroleum engineering technology services at Huanxi Ling Oil Plant, Section Huan
2-14-16. The quantity of, and the equipment and facilities themselves procured
and installed by Party A is necessary to complete the petroleum engineering
technology services in the Agreement. Party A agrees to sell to Party B all of
the equipment and facilities on the item lists.


 


2. Party B shall inspect and verify
every item on the equipment and facilities lists provided by Party A. Party B
agrees to buy all of the equipment and facilities on the lists provided by
Party A.


 


3. The transaction price shall be
determined by the account value of the equipment and facilities on Party B’s
financial reports dated June 30, 2007.


 


4. Payment in installments: Within
25 working days after the Agreement is signed into effect, Party B shall make
the initial payment amounting to 20,000,000 yuan to the account specified by
Party A. The remainder shall be paid before June 30, 2008.


 


5. Party B agrees that beginning
from the date that this Agreement is signed into effect, Party B shall formally
lease such equipment and facilities to Party A, the term of which shall expire
on December 31, 2010.


 


6. Party A shall pay to Party B as
rent 730,000 yuan/month for the use of such equipment and facilities, to be
paid to the account specified by Party B before the 8th of each following
month.


 


7. This Agreement is in 2 originals,
each party holding 1 original. The Agreement enters into effect on the date of
signing.


 

















 


Parties’ signatures and seals:


 


Party A (affix seal here): Tianjin Xin Gao Di Technology Development Co., Ltd.


 


	
  /s/ Liu Feng Kai

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  (Name of Legal Representative)

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:
  Liu Feng Kai

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date: July 12, 2007

  	
   

  



 


2

















 


Party B (affix seal here): Hebei Dao Fu Petroleum Exploration Technology Development
Co., Ltd.


 


	
  /s/ Yan Peu Ju

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  (Name of Legal Representative)

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:
  Yan Peu Ju

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date: July 12, 2007

  	
   

  



 


3
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10700-S10701]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT--H.R. 6867

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that at 3 p.m. 
today, the Senate proceed to vote on the motion to invoke cloture on 
the motion to proceed to H.R. 6867; that if cloture is invoked on the 
motion to proceed, then

[[Page S10701]]

all postcloture time be yielded back and the motion to proceed be 
agreed to; that after the bill is reported, it then be read a third 
time, and the Senate proceed to vote on passage of the bill, without 
further intervening action or debate; that if cloture is not invoked on 
the motion to proceed, then a motion to reconsider the failed cloture 
vote be considered as entered, and the Senate then proceed to a period 
of morning business, with Senators permitted to speak for up to 10 
minutes each.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  Mr. REID. If the Chair will withhold, I appreciate very much all 
Senators' thoughtful consideration of what we are trying to accomplish. 
I especially extend my appreciation to the Republican leader for his 
stepping out of important meetings to take calls from me and being 
available to help us work our way through these difficult times.
  We are all trying to accomplish the same thing. We have an economy 
that is in peril, and we want to make sure we do everything we can 
within reason and keeping with our responsibilities to succeed.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  Mr. ALEXANDER. No objection.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. REID. This will be the last vote this week.

                          ____________________
```