88724 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 89 

FR 54435 (July 1, 2024). 

2See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and 

Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Persulfates from the People’s 

Republic of China, 62 FR 36259 (July 7, 1997), as 

amended by Notice of Amended Antidumping Duty 

Order: Persulfates from the People’s Republic of 

China, 62 FR 39212 (July 22, 1997) (collectively, 

Order). 

3See Evonik’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to 

Participate,’’ dated July 10, 2024 (Domestic 

Interested Party Intent to Participate). 

4See Evonik’s Letter, ‘‘Domestic Industry’s 

Substantive Response,’’ dated July 26, 2024. 

5See Domestic Interested Party Intent to 

Participate. 

6See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews for 

July 2024,’’ dated August 21, 2024; see also 19 CFR 

351.218(3)(1)(ii)(C)(1). 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ inadvertently dated June 22, 2024, 

rather than July 22, 2024. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Fifth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Persulfates from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

9 Id. 

by BIS pursuant to section 764.3(a)(2) of 

the Regulations; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from Rossiya of any item 

subject to the EAR that has been 

exported from the United States except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; 

D. Obtain from Rossiya in the United 

States any item subject to the EAR with 

knowledge or reason to know that the 

item will be, or is intended to be, 

exported from the United States except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the EAR that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by Rossiya, or 

service any item, of whatever origin, 

that is owned, possessed or controlled 

by Rossiya if such service involves the 

use of any item subject to the EAR that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States except directly related to 

safety of flight and authorized by BIS 

pursuant to section 764.3(a)(2) of the 

Regulations. For purposes of this 

paragraph, servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification, or 

testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the EAR, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Rossiya by 

ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

sections 766.24(e) of the EAR, Rossiya 

may, at any time, appeal this Order by 

filing a full written statement in support 

of the appeal with the Office of the 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast 

Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South 

Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202– 

4022. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may 

seek renewal of this Order by filing a 

written request not later than 20 days 

before the expiration date. A renewal 

request may be opposed by Rossiya as 

provided in section 766.24(d), by filing 

a written submission with the Assistant 

Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement, which must be received 

not later than seven days before the 

expiration date of the Order. 

A copy of this Order shall be provided 

to Rossiya and shall be published in the 

Federal Register. 

This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect for one year. 

Matthew S. Axelrod, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2024–25983 Filed 11–7–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–847] 

Persulfates From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of the 

Expedited Fifth Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

fifth sunset review, the U.S. Department 

of Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on persulfates from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) 

would likely lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping at the level 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Expedited Sunset Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

DATES: Applicable November 8, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Howard Smith, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

After Commerce initiated this sunset 

review 1 of the Order,2 pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act), Evonik 

Corporation (Evonik), a domestic 

interested party, timely submitted a 

complete notice of intent to participate 

in,3 and an adequate substantive 

response regarding, the sunset review.4

Evonik claimed interested party status 

under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a 

producer of the domestic like product in 

the United States.5 Commerce did not 

receive a substantive response from any 

respondent interested party, nor was a 

hearing requested. Consequently, on 

August 21, 2024, Commerce notified the 

U.S. International Trade Commission 

that it did not receive an adequate 

substantive response from any 

respondent interested parties.6 As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. On July 22, 

2024, Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.7 The 

deadline for the final results of this 

expedited sunset review is now 

November 5, 2024. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is persulfates from China. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.8

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and the 

magnitude of the dumping margin likely 

to prevail if the Order were to be 

revoked, is provided in the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.9 A list of the sections in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum is 

in the appendix to this notice. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Notices 88725 

1See Polyester Textured Yarn from Indonesia: 

Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value, 86 FR 58875 (October 25, 2021) 

(Final Determination), and accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

2See Polyester Textured Yarn from Indonesia, 

Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 71031 

(December 14, 2021) (Order). 

3See PT. Asia Pac. Fibers TBK v. United States, 

673 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (CIT 2023). 

4 Id., 673 F. Supp. 3d at 1333. 

5See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, PT. Asia Pacific Fibers TBK v. 

United States, 673 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (CIT 2023), 

dated August 8, 2024 (Final Remand), at 6, 

available at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FinalRemandRedetermination.aspx. 

6See PT. Asia Pac. Fibers TBK v. United States, 

No. 22–00007, Slip Op. 24–113 (CIT October 11, 

2024). 

7See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 

(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 

8See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers 

Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 

2010) (Diamond Sawblades). 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Expedited Sunset 

Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

would likely lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping, and that the 

magnitude of the dumping margins 

likely to prevail are up to 119.02 

percent. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing, and publishing notice 

of, the results of this sunset review in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: November 4, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping 

Likely to Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–26024 Filed 11–7–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–560–838] 

Polyester Textured Yarn From 

Indonesia: Notice of Court Decision 

Not in Harmony With the Final 

Determination of Antidumping 

Investigation; Notice of Amended Final 

Determination; Notice of Amended 

Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 11, 2024, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

issued its final judgment in PT. Asia 

Pacific Fibers Tbk. v. United States and 

Unifi Manufacturing, Inc. and Nan Ya 

Plastics Corporation, Court no. 22– 

00007, sustaining the U.S. Department 

of Commerce’s (Commerce) remand 

determination pertaining to the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation on 

Polyester Textured Yarn from Indonesia 

covering the period October 1, 2019, 

through September 30, 2020. Commerce 

is notifying the public that the CIT’s 

final judgment is not in harmony with 

Commerce’s final determination in the 

investigation, and Commerce is 

amending the final determination and 

the resulting AD order with respect to 

the dumping margins assigned to PT. 

Asia Pacific Fibers Tbk (Asia Pacific) 

and all other producers and exporters of 

subject merchandise. 

DATES: Applicable October 21, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Shaw, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0697. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 25, 2021, Commerce 

published its Final Determination in the 

LTFV investigation of Polyester 

Textured Yarn from Indonesia.1

Commerce concluded that Asia Pacific 

failed to cooperate to the best of its 

ability and thus determined the use of 

an adverse inference in selecting from 

among the facts available (AFA) was 

warranted in determining the rate for 

Asia Pacific. Commerce subsequently 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD order on polyester textured yarn 

from Indonesia.2

Asia Pacific appealed Commerce’s 

Final Determination. On December 12, 

2023, the CIT remanded the Final 

Determination.3 Specifically, the CIT 

remanded to Commerce to prepare a 

verification report and to provide Asia 

Pacific a reasonable opportunity to 

place information on the record 

addressing any deficiencies found by 

Commerce in the respondent’s 

verification questionnaire responses and 

all parties the opportunity to file case 

briefs.4

In its final remand redetermination, 

issued August 8, 2024, Commerce 

reconsidered its Final Determination, 

determining that AFA was no longer 

warranted for Asia Pacific and 

recalculated the estimated weightedaverage dumping margin for Asia 

Pacific.5 The CIT sustained Commerce’s 

final redetermination.6 Asia Pacific’s 

dumping margin is now 9.20 percent. 

Consequently, the dumping margin 

applicable to all other companies has 

changed and is now 8.72 percent. 

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken,7 as clarified 

by Diamond Sawblades,8 the U.S. Court 

of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held 

that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), Commerce must publish a 

notice of court decision that is not ‘‘in 

harmony’’ with a Commerce 

determination and must suspend 

liquidation of entries pending a 

‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s 

October 11, 2024, judgment constitutes 

a final decision of the CIT that is not in 

harmony with Commerce’s Final 

Determination and Order. Thus, this 

notice is published in fulfillment of the 

publication requirements of Timken. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1