Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 21 / Friday, January 31, 2014 / Proposed Rules 5363 

most recent notice of Type 1–A or Type 

1–B rate adjustment. 

(d) Unused rate adjustment authority 

generated under paragraph (a) of this 

section shall be subject to the limitation 

under § 3010.29, regardless of whether it 

is used alone or in combination with 

other existing unused rate adjustment 

authority. 

■ 21. Add new § 3010.30 to read as 

follows: 

§ 3010.30 De minimis rate increases. 

(a) The Postal Service may elect to file 

a Type 1–A notice of rate adjustment as 

a de minimis rate increase if: 

(1) For each affected class, the rate 

increases contained within the notice of 

a Type 1–A rate adjustment do not 

result in the percentage change in rates 

for the class equaling or exceeding 0.001 

percent; and 

(2) For each affected class, the sum of 

all rate increases included in de 

minimis rate increases since the most 

recent Type 1–A or Type 1–B rate 

adjustment that was not a de minimis 

rate increase does not result in the 

percentage change in rates for the class 

equaling or exceeding 0.001 percent. 

(b) No unused rate adjustment 

authority will be added to the schedule 

of unused rate adjustment authority 

maintained under § 3010.26(f) as a 

result of a de minimis rate increase. 

(c) No rate decreases may be taken 

into account when determining whether 

rate increases comply with paragraphs 

(a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. 

(d) In the next notice of a Type 1–A 

or Type 1–B rate adjustment for a class 

that is not a de minimis rate increase: 

(1) The annual limitation shall be 

calculated as if the de minimis rate 

increase had not been filed; and 

(2) For purposes of calculating the 

percentage change in rates, the current 

rate shall be the current rate from the de 

minimis rate increase. 

(e) The Postal Service shall file 

supporting workpapers with each notice 

of de minimis rate increase that 

demonstrate that the sum of all rate 

increases included in de minimis rate 

increases since the most recent Type 1– 

A or Type 1–B notice of rate adjustment 

that was not de minimis does not result 

in a percentage change in rates for the 

class equaling or exceeding 0.001 

percent. 

[FR Doc. 2014–01669 Filed 1–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0502; FRL–9905–31– 

Region 5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Wisconsin; Total Suspended 

Particulate Matter SIP Revision 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

revision to the Wisconsin State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP 

revision repeals an obsolete Total 

Suspended Particulate Matter rule to 

align the State’s air quality standards 

with the current National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards. This action makes no 

substantive changes to the SIP and 

imposes no new requirements. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 3, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2013–0502, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: aburano.douglas@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 408–2279. 

4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief, 

Attainment Planning and Maintenance 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano, 

Chief, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Regional Office normal hours 

of operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. The Regional Office official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gilberto Alvarez, Environmental 

Scientist, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 

60604, (312) 886–6143, 

alvarez.gilberto@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the Rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

Dated: December 23, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2014–01899 Filed 1–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2006–0885; FRL–9906–02– 

Region 6] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; 

Approval of Texas Motor Vehicle Rule 

Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of 

revisions submitted by the State of 

Texas that affect the Texas State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning 

Texas’ motor vehicle air pollution rules. 

Based upon the State’s submitted Texas 

clean fuel fleet (TCFF) program 

equivalency demonstration that the new 

Tier 2 and 2007 heavy-duty diesel 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
5364 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 21 / Friday, January 31, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

vehicles and engines meet or exceed the 

LEV requirement, we are proposing to 

approve the removal of the TCFF 

program’s repealed low emission 

vehicle (LEV) rules and mobile emission 

reduction credit (MERC) rules from the 

Texas SIP. We also are proposing to 

approve the removal of the 

Transportation Control Measures (TCM) 

substitution repealed rules from the 

Texas SIP. We are proposing to approve 

as part of the SIP, a new Texas Clean 

Fleet (TCF) program, with submitted 

revisions, to incentivize replacement of 

diesel vehicles and engines with 

alternatively fueled vehicles and 

engines, including hybrids. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before March 3, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning 

Section (6PD–L), Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

Comments may also be submitted 

electronically or through hand delivery/ 

courier by following the detailed 

instructions in the Addresses section of 

the direct final rule located in the rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

John Walser, Air Planning Section 

(6PD–L), Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, 

telephone (214) 665–7128; email 

address walser.john@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal without prior proposal 

because the Agency views this as a 

noncontroversial submittal and 

anticipates no adverse comments. A 

detailed rationale for the approval is set 

forth in the direct final rule. If no 

adverse comments are received in 

response to this action, no further 

activity is contemplated. If EPA receives 

adverse comments, the direct final rule 

will be withdrawn and all public 

comments received will be addressed in 

a subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. Please note 

that if EPA receives adverse comment 

on an amendment, paragraph, or section 

of this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

For additional information, see the 

direct final rule which is located in the 

rules section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: January 15, 2014. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2014–01902 Filed 1–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 79 

[MB Docket Nos. 12–108, 12–107; Report 

No. 2996] 

Petition for Reconsideration of Action 

in Rulemaking Proceeding 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Petition for reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: In this document, a Petition 

for Reconsideration (Petition) has been 

filed in the Commission’s Rulemaking 

proceeding by the National Association 

of the Deaf, et al. 

DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must 

be filed by February 18, 2014. Replies to 

an opposition must be filed by February 

25, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information on this 

proceeding, contact Adam Copeland, 

Adam.Copeland@fcc.gov <mailto: 

Adam.Copeland@fcc.gov.>, Media 

Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418– 

2120. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of Commission’s document, 

Report No. 2996, released January 24, 

2014. The full text of this document is 

available for viewing and copying in 

Room CY–B402, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554, or may be 

purchased from the Commission’s copy 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. 

(BCPI) (1–800–378–3160). The 

Commission will not send a copy of this 

Notice pursuant to the Congressional 

Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), 

because this Notice does not have an 

impact on any rules of particular 

applicability. 

Subject: Accessibility of User 

Interfaces, and Video Programming 

Guides and Menus; Accessible 

Emergency Information, and Apparatus 

Requirements for Emergency 

Information and Video Description: 

Implementation of the Twenty-First 

Century Communications and Video 

Accessibility Act of 2010, published at 

78 FR 77209, December 20, 2013, and 

published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). 

See § 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s 

rules. 

Number of Petitions Filed: 1. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Gloria J. Miles, 

Federal Register Liaison, Office of the 

Secretary, Office of Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2014–02000 Filed 1–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 648 

[Docket No. 130716623–4062–01] 

RIN 0648–BD50 

Fisheries of the Northeastern United 

States; Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and 

Butterfish Fisheries; Framework 

Adjustment 8 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Proposed rule, request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: Framework Adjustment 8 

(Framework 8) proposes several changes 

to facilitate operation of the butterfish 

discard cap in the longfin squid fishery 

and the directed butterfish fishery. 

Framework 8 would allocate the 

butterfish discard cap among trimesters 

in the same percentages used for the 

trimester allocations for longfin squid: 

43 percent to Trimester I (January to 

April); 17 percent to Trimester II (May 

to August), and 40 percent to Trimester 

III (September to December). Each 

trimester would close when it is 

estimated that 95 percent of the 

butterfish discard cap has been taken. In 

addition, Framework 8 would allow 

NMFS to transfer, in either direction, up 

to 50 percent of unused quota between 

the butterfish landing allocation and the 

discard cap on the longfin squid fishery. 

This would occur near the end of the 

year in order to optimally utilize the 

butterfish that is available for fishing 

each year. 

DATES: Public comments must be 

received by March 3, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting 

documents used by the Mid-Atlantic 

Fishery Management Council (Council), 

including the Environmental 

Assessment (EA) and Regulatory Impact 

Review (RIR)/Initial Regulatory 

Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), are 

available from: Dr. Christopher M. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1