alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 83/17 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 83 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6017 March 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 83

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6017 March 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 83/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 83/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 12 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 83/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2017/C 83/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ACCEL INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            30,343
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  36,294
<CASH>                                           2,587
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,618
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 49,535
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             12,449
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           947
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,618
<PREMIUMS>                                      18,824
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              2,150
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                (44)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     566
<BENEFITS>                                      22,051
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        308
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             9,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (270)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,451)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,451)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  22,028
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             17,641
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                4,721
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               7,927
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 6,063
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 49,535
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (4,647)
        

</TABLE>
Safe Forklift Operation

Forklift operators and employees working around 

these operations are at risk of hazards such as 

collisions, falls, tip-overs, and struck-by conditions. 

Ways to prevent these hazards include: 

Forklift Operations

• Always operate the vehicle according to the 

manufacturer’s instructions.

• Always wear a seatbelt when the forklift has one.

• Never exceed the rated load and ensure it is stable 

and balanced.

• Do not raise or lower the load while traveling.

• Keep a safe distance from platform and ramp edges.

• Be aware of other vehicles in the work area.

• Have clear visibility of the work area and ensure 

you have enough clearance when raising, loading, 

and operating a forklift.

• Use proper footing and the handhold, if available, 

when entering the lift.

• Use horns at cross aisles and obstructed areas.

• Watch for pedestrians and observe the speed limit.

• Do not give rides or use the forks to lift people.

Safety Training

• Only trained and certified workers may operate 

a forklift.

• Ensure operators are trained on types of trucks in use.

Forklift Maintenance

• Remove from service any forklift found to be in 

unsafe operating condition.

• Keep forklifts in clean condition; free of excess oil 

and grease.

• Repair and maintain according to the manufacturer’s 

recommendations.

QUICK

CARDTMOSHA 3949-04R 2019

For more information:

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY L. WATTS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

H. NGUYEN; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-17104 

D.C. No. 1:13-cv-00917-AWI-SKO 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 13, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Timothy L. Watts appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing for failure to prosecute his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action 

alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Omstead v. Dell, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-17104 

Inc., 594 F.3d 1081, 1084 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Watts’s action 

for failure to prosecute because Watts did not comply with the district court’s 

orders directing Watts to file a response to defendants’ motion for summary 

judgment or explain why he failed to do so. See id. (discussing the five factors for 

determining whether to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute

or comply with a court order); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 

1992) (although dismissal is a harsh penalty, the district court’s dismissal should 

not be disturbed absent “a definite and firm conviction” that it “committed a clear 

error of judgment” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We do not consider Watts’s contentions regarding lost legal papers raised for 

the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 

2009).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2364]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               HONORING JIM WITT, CITY MANAGER OF COPPELL

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. KENNY MARCHANT

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. MARCHANT. Madam Speaker, I rise to recognize Jim Witt, who is 
retiring after fifteen years of service as City Manager of Coppell, 
Texas. His dedication to the community proves that citizens can truly 
make a difference in the lives of others, and I am proud to honor such 
a distinguished leader.
  Mr. Witt has played an indispensable role in the development of 
Coppell during his tenure. In his fifteen years of service, Coppell has 
increased its size by 19,000 residents, the City staff increased from 
178 to 365, and the City budget grew from roughly $15 million to 
approximately $81 million.
  Mr. Witt oversaw tremendous economic growth in Coppell. Many of the 
buildings in Coppell that stand as cornerstones of the community were 
only possible through the efforts of Mr. Witt. To name just a few of 
the buildings he has played an instrumental role with: the Justice 
Center, three Fire Stations, a Fire Administration building, a Service 
Center, the William T. Cozby Public Library, an Aquatics and Recreation 
Center, a Municipal Cemetery, Wagon Wheel Park, Andy Brown East and 
Central, MacArthur Park, over six miles of trails, Town Center Plaza, 
and the Community/Senior Center.
  With Mr. Witt's leadership, he helped create several community-based 
initiatives such as Farmers Market, community gardens and the half-cent 
sales tax for schools.
  On behalf of the 24th District of Texas, I would like to thank Mr. 
Witt for his tireless service to Coppell. Mr. Witt's successes have 
been many, and it is an honor for me to recognize him for his nearly 
two decades of contributions to the people of Coppell. I ask all my 
colleagues to join me in wishing Jim Witt continued success in his 
future.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Signal
Investment & Management Co.'s unaudited financial statements and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                              14
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,645
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        336,567
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                         697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   349,816
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,503
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,641
<INCOME-TAX>                                       558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,083
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,083
<EPS-BASIC>                                      4,332
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    4,332


</TABLE>
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on December 31, 2016

DOCKET NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S NAME
DOCKETED
TYPE*
BRIEFING NOTICE
DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT
PARTICIPATING
1
09-1901
Seward Ship’s Drydock, Inc.
11/14/11
DFR
11/21/11,
04/17/13
Closed

2
08-1774
Angelica Textile
Services, Inc.
09/28/12
DFR
10/16/12
Closed

3
11-2395
Kiewit Power Constructors Co.
01/24/13
DFR
03/04/13
Closed

4
12-0643
K.M. Davis Contracting, Inc.
01/25/13
DFR
01/30/13
Closed

5
11-2780
Peacock Engineering, Inc.
05/22/13
DFR
05/30/13
Closed

6
11-1734
Calpine
Corporation
06/24/13
DFR
06/26/13
Closed


7

10-0637
BP Products North America, Inc., & BP-Husky
Refining, LLC

09/16/13

DFR

11/01/13

Closed

8
12-1600
Envision Waste Services
02/10/14
DFR
02/24/14
04/16/14
Closed


9

12-2142
Meadows
Construction Company, LLC

06/05/14

DFR

06/24/14

Closed

10
12-2385
Evergreen Construction Co.
08/11/14
DFR
10/24/14
Closed

11
12-1617
Houston Aquarium, Inc.
09/18/14
DFR
10/20/14
Closed


12

13-1022
Mid South Waffles, Inc., d/b/a Waffle House
#1283

12/31/14

DFR

02/03/15

Closed

13
14-0948
Florida Gas Contractors, Inc.
01/15/15
DFR
02/06/15
Closed

14
12-1287
CSA Equipment Company, LLC
01/16/15
DFR
02/09/15
Closed

15
13-0224
A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc.
03/23/15
DFR
04/08/15
Closed

16
13-1817
Missouri Basin Well Service Inc.
04/23/15
DFR
05/07/15
Closed

17
14-0844
Quick Transport of Arkansas, LLC
07/01/15
DFR
07/28/15
Closed

18
13-1124
Integra Health Management, Inc.
07/21/15
DFR
09/18/15
Closed

19
13-0900
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc.
08/31/15
DFR
09/18/15
Closed


Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on December 31, 2016

DOCKET NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S NAME
DOCKETED
TYPE*
BRIEFING NOTICE
DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT
PARTICIPATING
20
13-1169
North Eastern Precast LLC
10/29/15
DFR
11/02/15
Closed

21
13-1170
Masonry Services Inc. dba MSI
10/29/15
DFR
11/02/15
Closed

22
13-0644
Wynnewood Refining Co., LLC
03/03/16
DFR
03/18/16
Closed

23
13-0791
Wynnewood Refining Co., LLC
03/03/16
DFR
03/18/16
Closed


24

14-1688
Science Applications
International Corp., d/b/a SAIC

06/23/16

DFR

10/31/16

Open

25
15-1121
Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.
06/30/16
DFR
11/09/16
Open


26

15-1121
Dover High
Performance Plastics

07/19/16

DFR

11/01/16

Open

27
15-1347
Gate Precast Company
11/10/16
DFR
12/05/16
Open

*DFR – Direction for Review REM – Appellate Remand
INT REV - Interlocutory Review
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JILL MCKELVY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 15

- 35879

D.C. No. 3:14

- cv

- 05681

- RBL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 24, 2020 * *

Before: FARRIS, TROTT, and SILVERMAN , Circuit Judges.

Jill McKelvy appeals from the district court’s order granting the

Commissioner of Social Security’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion

to amend the district court’s original judgment following the Commiss ioner’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 26 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 35879

denial of her application for disability insurance and supplemental security income

benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We review for abuse of

discretion

, Allstate Ins. Co. v. Herron , 634 F.3d 1101, 1111 (9th Cir. 2011)

, and we

affirm

.

The district court initially remanded the action in part for the administrative

law judge (ALJ) to develop the record, but subsequently granted the

Commissioner’s Rule 59(e) motion and affirmed the Commissioner’s denial of

benefits. The district court did not abuse its discretion because the original order

was based on an erroneous reading of the ALJ’s decision. See Herron , 634 F.3d at

1111 (amending a judgment appropriate where the original judgment rested on

manifest factual or legal error). Contrary to the district court’s original order , the

ALJ did not ignore the diagnoses of two examining dermatologists. The d istrict

court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the original judgment

improperly shifted McKelvy’s burden of proof to the ALJ, where the record

contained no evidence of functional limitations related to McKelvy’s delusional

disorder. See May es v. Massanari , 276 F.3d 453, 459

- 60 (9th Cir. 2001) ( claimant

has the burden to prove disability and , where there is a complete lack of evidence,

the ALJ has no duty to develop the record).

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 3

(Mark One)

|x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarter ended: September 30, 2008

or



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from  to

Commission
File Number: 0-26004

DIVERSIFIED FUTURES TRUST I

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 13-3780260                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



|                                                |  |           
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------
|900 King Street, Suite 100, Rye Brook, New York |  | 10573     
|(Address of principal executive offices)        |  | (Zip Code)

(914) 307-7000

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes
  x     No    ̈

Indicate by
check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller
reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



|                           |  |                             
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Large accelerated filer   ̈ |  | Accelerated filer   ̈        
|Non-accelerated filer  x   |  | Smaller Reporting Company   ̈

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).

Yes    ̈     No   x









---

DIVERSIFIED FUTURES TRUST I





Explanatory Note

The Form 10-Q/A is being filed solely to correct the omission of certain language required under
the Certification in the Diversified Futures Trust Is Form 10-Q previously filed on November 12, 2008 as amended and further amended on February 2, 2009, which are restated in their entirety herewith. Except for the foregoing amended
information, no other changes have been made to the Form 10-Q filed on November 12, 2008 as amended and further amended on February 2, 2009 by this amendment.



2
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 
Commission Monthly Case Activity for April 2013 
 
 
  
 
1. 
 Cases Pending Beginning of Month  
 30 
 
 
  
 
  
 
2. 
 Cases Added to Docket  
 
Cranesville Aggregate Companies, Inc., d/b/a Scotia Bag Plant; and Cranesville Block Company, Inc. 
No. 09-2011 
Direction for Review on 4/25/13 
 
Cranesville Aggregate Companies, Inc., d/b/a Scotia Bag Plant; and Cranesville Block Company, Inc. 
No. 09-2055 
Direction for Review on 4/25/13 
 
Cranesville Aggregate Companies, Inc., d/b/a Scotia Bag Plant; and Cranesville Block Company, Inc. 
No. 10-0447 
Direction for Review on 4/25/13 
 
S.J. Louis Construction of Texas 
No. 12-1045 
Direction for Review on 4/25/13 
 
 
 4 
 
 
3. 
 Cases Subtracted From Docket 
 
Otis Elevator Company 
No. 09-1278 
Decision on 4/8/13 
 
Monroe Drywall Construction, Inc.  
No. 12-0379 
Decision and Remand on 4/19/13 
 
Cranesville Block Company, Inc. 
No. 10-0447 
Order on 4/26/13 
 
 
 -3 
 
4. 
 Total Cases Pending End of Month 
 31
Swanson, Brian (OST) hmr^QgTr.L^^f - %(*0^ 

— ^i^Mp/OP 

From: Frank J. Valach [fjvalach@midrivers.com] '"-''• OnTATlDKf 

Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 12:45 PM ~, (P"]' DPFPArb^uf, 

To: Swanson, Brian (OST) ^^'^CW//U^'6 

Subject: IVIontana EAS •;']< i ..i , « 

^^^/J4A/n p 2:00 

Dear Brian Swanson, 

Tomorrow morning i am taking a flight from Lewistown, Montana to Dallas/Fort Worth via 

Denver. 

This has me thinking how fortunate I have been over the last several years to have had this 

direct flight to Denver which allowed me to make connections to cities across the U.S. 

Some people in control of decisions for Montana EAS have decided we do not need flights to 

Denver but only to Billings resulting in a switch of carriers. 

I question if this decision is what the majority of passengers want. 

I know that Great Lakes Aviation has not been perfect by any sense of the word. There have 

been many flight cancellations and schedule problems. 

Great Lakes offers service to Billings for those communities that want it. Maybe GLA needed 

to be held more accountable for the promises they made. 

In the future having service only to Billings means more plane changes, waiting time, etc to 

get to cities beyond Billings. This adds to the already long day trying to fly into/out of 

small town Montana. 

Previously Big Sky Airlines provided EAS service from Montana towns to Billings. This 

obviously did not work. Are we just going back to those days? 

Is this change a done deal? Is it possible for individual towns to select their choice of 

carrier? I would appreciate any thoughts you might have regarding this matter. 

Thank you for your time. 

Sincerely, 

Frank D. Valach