alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(c)

                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Georgia Power
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, we, the undersigned, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and
belief, that:

     (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Georgia Power Company for the year
          ended December 31, 2004, which this statement accompanies, fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of
          Georgia Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of Georgia Power Company.

                                        /s/Michael D. Garrett
                                         Michael D. Garrett
                                President and Chief Executive Officer

                                          /s/C. B. Harreld
                                            C. B. Harreld
                                      Executive Vice President,
                               Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
                                         Assistant Secretary

Date:  February 28, 2005
ex10_6.htm


 Exhibit 10.6 


 




 



	 
September 18, 2009







John Sprovieri


Auscrete Corporation


PO Box 847


Rufus, OR 97050







Dear John,

	





 




I am responding to your request to provide a letter of intent to proceed with the construction of in excess of 100 affordable houses on our development property, Gorge Vista, in the heights behind Rufus.







As you know, the population of the Sherman County area is expected to increase dramatically in the coming years, and the need for affordable housing is expected to increase right along with that.  Furthermore, there is demand for second homes in the Gorge, and the affordability of Auscrete homes will put the dream of a second home within reach for many that may not otherwise be able to afford one.  I feel strongly that Auscrete homes are the perfect solution for these needs, and will provide us with an opportunity to develop a very unique look and feel for our development.







The vision for our development is to have an attractive layout with open spaces, common areas, trails, and a variety of recreational amenities.  As the climate is relatively dry in Rufus, we are planning to project a theme that could be described as “Southwestern” in nature. Your aerated concrete house construction fits perfectly with this need, and will allow us to cultivate an overall feel that is both well-suited to the area and completely new to the area.  There are no other developments in the Gorge that have this motif, which creates an opportunity for us to do something that is completely unprecedented.







 I have enclosed two draft site plans that we are currently contemplating for the site.  We expect to have a final design for Phase 1 developed by January next year, and we expect to be in a position to break ground early next year and begin construction of houses shortly thereafter.  At completion, Gorge Vista will likely have over 300 houses.  We look forward to working with Auscrete to achieve this long-term goal. 







Sincerely,


 


John  F. Schmidt  IV




 


John Schmidt


Principal












 


 Gorge Vista LLC   P.O. Box 1934    Sandy  OR   97055    Phone 503 704 9745   gorgevista@gmail.com
# Official Journal L 112I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 112I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6226 April 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 112I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6226 April 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RULES OF PROCEDURE |
| | * | European Investment Bank Decision of 26 February 2019 laying down internal rules concerning the processing of personal data by the Personnel Directorate of the European Investment Bank in relation to the provision of information to data subjects and the restriction of certain of their rights | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

RULES OF PROCEDURE

*

European Investment Bank Decision of 26 February 2019 laying down internal rules concerning the processing of personal data by the Personnel Directorate of the European Investment Bank in relation to the provision of information to data subjects and the restriction of certain of their rights

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 148/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.148.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 148 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5312 June 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.148.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 148

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5312 June 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 7 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of front and rear position lamps, stop-lamps and end-outline marker lamps for motor vehicles (except motor cycles) and their trailers | 1 |
| | * | Regulation No 23 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of reversing lamps for power-driven vehicles and their trailers | 34 |
| | * | Regulation No 38 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of rear fog lamps for power-driven vehicles and their trailers | 55 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 7 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of front and rear position lamps, stop-lamps and end-outline marker lamps for motor vehicles (except motor cycles) and their trailers

1

*

Regulation No 23 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of reversing lamps for power-driven vehicles and their trailers

34

*

Regulation No 38 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of rear fog lamps for power-driven vehicles and their trailers

55

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1

The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2832

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of South Dakota.

Douglas Franklin, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 7, 2007

Filed: November 28, 2007

___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Franklin appeals the 63-month prison sentence the district court1

imposed after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On appeal, Franklin’s counsel has moved to withdraw and

has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that

it would be a miscarriage of justice to enforce the appeal waiver, because, at the time

Franklin signed the plea agreement, neither party contemplated that Franklin would

not receive a 2-level acceptance-of-responsibility reduction or that he would receive
-2-

a 2-level obstruction-of-justice enhancement, both of which counsel further maintains

were based upon clearly erroneous findings.

Franklin’s written plea agreement contains a valid appeal waiver which

encompasses the argument that counsel raises on appeal, and we conclude that the

waiver is enforceable and that enforcing it would not cause a miscarriage of justice.

See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc)

(discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); see alsoUnited States v. Estrada-Bahena,

201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders

case).

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), and finding no non-frivolous issues not covered by the waiver, we enforce the

waiver and dismiss this appeal. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw on condition

that counsel inform appellant about the procedures for filing petitions for rehearing

and for certiorari.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10607]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                SCHEDULE

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, following leader remarks, the Senate will 
proceed to a period of morning business, with Senators permitted to 
speak for up to 10 minutes each.
  For the information of Senators, there will be a Senators-only 
classified briefing at 2:30 today. It will last for an hour or an hour 
and a half. We will have there Secretary Gates, Secretary Rice, and 
Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff James Cartwright. This will 
take place in our new secure meeting room in the Visitor Center.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6176

CARLOS E. GONZALEZ, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JON E. OZMINT; HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General for South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-2420-2-13) Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 29, 2005 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carlos E. Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Carlos E. Gonzalez, a South Carolina prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gonzalez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 318 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 318

   To authorize deposition testimony and representation in Care One 
Management LLC, et al. v. United Healthcare Workers East, SEIU 1199, et 
                                  al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2015

   Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize deposition testimony and representation in Care One 
Management LLC, et al. v. United Healthcare Workers East, SEIU 1199, et 
                                  al.

Whereas, in the case of Care One Management LLC, et al. v. United Healthcare 
        Workers East, SEIU 1199, et al., No. 2:12-cv-06371, pending in the 
        United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, testimony 
        has been sought from Rachel Pryor, a former employee in the office of 
        Senator Richard Blumenthal, relating to her official responsibilities;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent former employees of the Senate with 
        respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to 
        their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Rachel Pryor, former employee in the Office of 
Senator Richard Blumenthal, is authorized to testify in a deposition in 
the case of Care One Management LLC, et al. v. United Healthcare 
Workers East, SEIU 1199, et al., except concerning matters for which a 
privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Ms. 
Pryor in connection with the testimony authorized in section one of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                           EXHIBIT 10(III)(A)(1)
 
     FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALEXANDER'S, INC.
                               AND BRIAN M. KURTZ
 
     Amendment agreement, dated as of this the 11th day of December 1996
("Amendment Date") by and between Alexander's, Inc. and any successor in
interest thereto (the "Company") and Brian M. Kurtz (the "Executive").
 
     WITNESSETH:
 
     Whereas, the Company and the Executive are parties to an Employment
Agreement, dated March 29, 1995 (the "Current Agreement"); and
 
     Whereas, the Company and the Executive now desire to amend the Current
Agreement in accordance with the terms and provisions hereinafter set forth;
 
     Now, therefore, in consideration of these covenants and agreement set forth
herein and in the Current Agreement, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
 
     Effective January 1, 1997.
 
          1. Salary: Your base salary will be at the rate of $120,000 per annum
     and shall be paid to you in accordance with the Company's normal payroll
     practice.
 
          2. Duties: You shall be required to perform your duties for 104 days
     per year, reduced from 156 days per year.
 
          3. Benefits: You will not be entitled to any paid vacation during this
     extension period.
 
          4. No other changes: Except for the changes and amendments provided
     above, the Current Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
 
          5. Governing Law: This Amendment Agreement shall be governed by and
     construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.
 
                                          Alexander's, Inc.
 
                                          By:       /s/ JOSEPH MACNOW
                                          --------------------------------------
 
                                          Title: Vice President, Chief Financial
                                          Officer
 
                                          --------------------------------------
 
                                                  /s/ BRIAN M. KURTZ
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Brian M. Kurtz
 
                                       58
#### In Worth *v.*Raleigh & Gaston Railroad Company.

Smith, C. J.

.This appeal must be disposed of in the same manner and for the same reasons assigned and discussed in the appeal of the *Wilmington & Weldon Railroad, Company.*The provisions for exemption in the charters of each are essentially similar, and were both reviewed and passed on in the supreme court in *Raleigh & Gaston Railroad Company*v. *Reid,*13 Wall., 269.

There is error, and the judgment must be reversed and judgment here entered for the defendant.

Error. Reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INNKEEPERS USA TRUST FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998           
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,642
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         705,632
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 692,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,121
<BONDS>                                        265,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           331
<OTHER-SE>                                     339,631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   692,133
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,856
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,117
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,760)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Innkeepers USA Trust (the “Company”) for the period endingJune 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce Riggins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Date: August 8, 2005
Exhibit 32(e)


                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mississippi
Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, we, the undersigned, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and
belief, that:

(1)           such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mississippi Power Company for
              the year ended December 31, 2004, which this statement
              accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of
              Mississippi Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2004,
              fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
              and results of operations of Mississippi Power Company.

                                        /s/Anthony J. Topazi
                                          Anthony J. Topazi
                                President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       /s/Michael W. Southern
                                         Michael W. Southern
                                    Vice President, Treasurer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

Date:  February 28, 2005
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-147850) of Akorn, Inc.(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-124190) pertaining to the Amended and
Restated Akorn, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan of Akorn, Inc.(3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-160077) of Akorn, Inc.(4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-161908) pertaining to the Amended and
Restated Akorn, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan of Akorn, Inc.(5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-162273) of Akorn, Inc.
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP