alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10-QSB/A 1 FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   172
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,828)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       172
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (741)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne Peterkin, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 567]

Appeal by the defendant from (1) an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), dated March 28, 2003, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender, and (2) so much of an order of the same court entered May 1, 2003, as, upon renewal, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 28, 2003, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order entered May 1, 2003, made upon renewal; and it is further,

*752Ordered that the order entered May 1, 2003, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The People presented clear and convincing evidence sufficient to support the County Court’s determination designating the defendant a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v Hampton,*300 AD2d 641 [2002]; *People v Wroten,*286 AD2d 189 [2001] ). Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 183 (Monday, December 8, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1305]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
U.S. ECONOMY--ROLE OF CREDIT DERIVATIVES
Committee on Agriculture: Held a hearing to review the role of credit 
derivatives in the U.S. economy. Testimony was heard from public 
witnesses.
BRIEFING--MUMBAI/CYBER UPDATE
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence: Met in executive session to 
receive a briefing on Mumbai/Cyber Update. The Committee was briefed by 
departmental witnesses.
```
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

November 14, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-16071

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-21174-CV-AJ

ANA MARTIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

JOSE SALVATIERRA, individually, 

NELSON FIGUEROA, individually, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, a political 

subdivision of the State of 

Florida, 

Defendant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(November 14, 2007)
Before BLACK, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, the Court affirms the district court’s denial

of the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s 28 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for

false arrest based on qualified immunity for the reasons outlined in the district

court’s order dated November 7, 2006.

AFFIRMED.
One American Center 

600 Congress 

Suite 1900 

Austin, TX 78701 

P.O. Box 1149 

Austin, TX 78767 

p: 512.744.9300 

f: 512.744.9399 

www.dwmrlaw.com 

July 23, 2015 

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk 

First Court of Appeals 

301 Fannin Street, Suite 208 

Houston, Texas 77002 

RE: No. 01-12-00470; Entergy Corporation et al. v. David Jenkins et al., 

in the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas 

Dear Mr. Prine: 

Appellants' letter-brief of April 30, 2015, mentioned a recent opinion 

of the federal district court in Mississippi finding federal question 

jurisdiction in a case involving the same System Agreement and similar 

allegations as in this case. This is to advise the Court that the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has denied the plaintiff's requests for a 

discretionary appeal of that jurisdictional order. The appellate orders are 

enclosed. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ David C. Duggins 

David C. Duggins 

alm 

Enclosure 

cc: Joseph D. Jamail – w/enc. 

ACCEPTED

01-12-00470-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/23/2015 2:36:00 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/23/2015 2:36:00 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________________ 

No. 15-90011

___________________ 

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel, Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of 

Mississippi,

 Plaintiff - Petitioner

v.

ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INCORPORATED; ENTERGY CORPORATION; 

ENTERGY SERVICES, INCORPORATED; ENTERGY POWER, 

INCORPORATED; FICTITIOUS DEFENDANTS A-Z, those individuals, 

corporations or otherwise who acted as officer, director, agent, representative 

or employee of any of the other defendants, and have acted within the course 

and scope of that official capacity, agency, representation or employment,

 Defendants - Respondents

________________________ 

Motion for Leave to Appeal

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1453

________________________ 

Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal under 28 U.S.C. §

1453 is DENIED. 

 Case: 15-90011 Document: 00513070621 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2015

2 of 2
Certified as a true copy and issued 

as the mandate on 

Attest: 

Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Jul 15, 2015
NO. 07-06-0068-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	MARCH 2, 2006

	______________________________

	IN RE JOHN ROBERT WHIRTY, RELATOR

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Relator John Robert Whirty, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Potter County District Clerk, Caroline Woodburn, to file, number, and submit a writ of habeas corpus to the 181st District Court of Potter County.  We deny the petition.

	Our mandamus jurisdiction is limited.  We have authority to issue a writ of mandamus when necessary to enforce our jurisdiction and against district and county court judges within our district.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a) &(b)(1) (Vernon 2004). 

	By his petition, relator, who is confined in Potter County, asserts his conviction for capital murder in Dallas County is void and seeks relief by writ of habeas corpus.  He asserts Woodburn has the ministerial duty to file and submit his writ to the trial court.  He has not, however, demonstrated that his petition implicates a pending appeal in our district.  See In re Moody, 93 S.W.3d 928, 929 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding).  Thus, he has not shown that mandamus relief is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.  See generally In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex.App.–San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding) (denying mandamus relief sought against a district clerk). 

	Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice
'0

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

IMPERIAL SUGAR COMPANY,

IMPERIAL-SAVANNAH, L.P.,

Respondents.

ORDER

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

OSHRC DOCKET NO.

08-1104

REGION IV

For good cause shown, the Complainant's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of

Time in Which to Respond to Respondents' Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Partial Summary

Judgment is hereby GRANTED. The Complainant shall have until Friday, February 27, 2009, to

respond to the Motions.

The

c~~/ Honorable Covette Rooney 1

u.s. OSHRC Judge

Dated: j1fJ(1J'f

Washington, D.C.
c

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

o

This is to certify that a copy ofthe Order was mailed to the parties listed below by first class

mail on February 2,2009.

08-1104

Stanley E. Keen, Regional Solicitor

u.S. Department ofLabor

Office ofthe Solicitor

Atlanta Federal Center Room 7T10

61 Forsyth Street

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Attention: Karen Mock, Esquire

Charles H. Morgan, Esquire

Alston & Bird, LLP

One Atlantic Center

1201 West Peachtree Street

Atlanta, GA 30309-3424

Denise

~~M. Bowie, Adm. Asst.

Post Office Address:

Judge Covette Rooney

OSHRC

One Lafayette Centre

1120 20th Street, N.W.

Room 990

Washington, D.C. 20036-3457

(202) 606-5405 FAX (202) 606-5409
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6352

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT LEE TRENT, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:97-cr-70004-jlk; 7:06-cv-00063-jlk) Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 24, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Trent, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Lee Trent, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (2000) motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and dismissing it as successive, and a subsequent order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a subst antial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Trent has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
• You have the right to a safe workplace.

• You can report unsafe conditions to your 

employer, such as: wet floors, electrical 

hazards, or unsafe or unguarded machinery. 

• You have the right to report early signs of 

injuries, such as:

{ Hand pain or numbness

{ Stiffness in your fingers

{ Hand swelling

{ Shoulder or back pain

• You have the right to report symptoms to your 

employer. 

• You have the right to request an OSHA 

inspection if you believe your workplace is 

dangerous — it’s confidential.

• If you have been punished for speaking up, 

call OSHA within 30 days of the punishment.

OSHA 4186-07 2022

Poultry Workers: Protect Your Health!

OSHA is here to help. 

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)
Rijerbal Ro Ilo Mōn Bao Ko: Kōjbarok Ejmour Ko Ami!

• Ej tellôkum juon jikin jerbal eo ejjelôk menin 

kauwôtata ak jorren ko ie. 

• Kwo maroñ ripoote jekjek ko rejjab tiljek ak safe nan 

jikin jerbal eo am, einwot: floor ko rôkkōr ak tutu, to 

ak kein jerbal in jarom ko rajōrwawa, ak machine ko 

ejjelôk kein bōbrae jorren jeni.

• Ewõr am maroñ in ripoote kōkalle in jorren ko ilo tere 

eo wot kwoj jino am loi, einwōt:

{ Metak-tok peim ak mijtok peim

{ Kijñene-tok addiin peim

{ Ebbõj-tok peim

{ Metaktok aeram ak diim [likñm]

• Ewõr am maroñ ñan ripoote kōkalle kein ñan jikin 

jerbal eo am.

• Ewõr am maroñ in kajjitōk lôk an OSHA kōmmane 

juon jerbal in etale, elañe kwōj kile ke jikin jerbal eo 

am ekauwōtata ak ejatiljek nan jerbal — ijin enaaj 

ikōtamiro wōt OSHA.

• Elane ewōr kaje nae yuk kin am kar kwalok am 

abnōnō, kōnnaanōklok OSHA enjab le jen 30 ran.

OSHA ebed ñan jibañ. 

1-800-321-OSHA (6742) Administración de Seguridad

y Salud Ocupacional

Departamento de Trabajo de E.E. U.U.

www.osha.gov

Kejbarok ilo Jikin jerbal 

im ijo ej Eddoik Ejmour
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, November 13, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on November 14, 2024.

# PLACE:

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtual (This meeting will be a hybrid meeting.)

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules and practices.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-25999 Filed 11-5-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit 99.1Agreement Regarding Disclosure of Long-Term Debt Instruments     In reliance upon Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delawarelimited partnership (the “Partnership”), has not filed as an exhibit to its Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, any instrument with respect to long-term debtnot being registered where the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed tenpercent of the total assets of the Partnership and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, the Partnership hereby agrees to furnish acopy of any such agreement to the Securities Exchange Commission upon request.       AIMCO Properties, L.P.       By: AIMCO-GP, Inc., its general partner       By: /s/ Paul J. McAuliffe         Paul J. McAuliffe    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial    Officer
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cecil Bancorp, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; and3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report.4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based
upon such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small
business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 10, 2007/s/ Mary B. Halsey

Mary B. HalseyPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 Page 20
DATOS 

RÁPIDOS
 

Permisos-Requeridos
 

Espacios Confinados
 

Un espacio confinado tiene aperturas de entrada y salida 

limitadas, es lo suficientemente grande para un empleado entrar 

y trabajar y no esta designado para la ocupación de trabajo 

continuo. Espacios confinados incluyen bóvedas subterráneas, 

tanques, recipientes de almacenaje, registros, pozos, silos, 

bóvedas de servicio subterráneas y tuberías de distribución. 

Ver 29 CFR 1910.146. 

Permisos requeridos para espacios confinados son espacios 

confinados que: 

• Pueden contener una atmósfera peligosa o potencialmente

peligrosa.

• Pueden contener un material que puede sumergir a un empleado. 

• Pueden contener paredes que convergen hacia adentro o piso

que la pendiente desciende y se estrechan en un área mas

pequeña en la cual puede atrapar o aficiar al trabajador.

• Pueden contener otros peligros serios físicos tales como

máquinas sin protección o cables vivos expuestos.

• Deben ser identificado por el empleador el cual debe informar

a los empleado expuestos de la existencia y localización de

tales espacios y sus peligros.

Que hacer 

• No entre a un espacio confinado con permiso requerido sin

estar capacitado y sin tener un permiso para entrar.

• Estudie, comprenda y siga los procedimientos del empleador

antes de entrar al espacio confinado con permiso requerido y

sepa como y cuando entrar y salir.

• Antes de entrar, identifique cualquier peligro físico.

• Antes y durante la entrada, examine y controle el contenido de

oxígeno, flamabilidad, toxicidad o peligros de explosión como

sea necesario.

• Use el equipo de protección contra caída, rescate, monitoreo

de aire, ventilación, equipo de comunicación de acuerdo con

los procedimientos de entrada.

• Mantenga contacto en todo momento con un asistente entrenado asi sea visualmente, a travez de teléfono o por radio de communicación direccional. Este sistema de monitoreo le permite al

asistente y al supervisor de la entrada ordenar evacuar y alertar

apropiadamente al personal de capacidad de rescate para rescatar al trabajador cuando sea necesario.

Usted tiene derecho a un lugar de trabajo seguro. 

Si usted tiene preguntas acerca de seguridad y salud 

en el lugar de trabajo, llame a OSHA 

Es confidencial. Te podemos ayudar! 

Para más información: 

Departamento de Trabajo 

de los EE. UU. 

Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional 

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)