alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                              ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (In thousands, except ratios)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           2003           2002           2001           2000           1999
                                         ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
<S>                                      <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings:
Income before income tax expense         $  11,838      $ (87,368)     $ (16,421)     $ (20,079)     $ 186,525

Less: Capitalized interest                  (1,484)        (2,051)        (7,459)       (13,799)       (10,380)
Add:
Interest on indebtedness                    45,164         46,261         47,432         36,043         16,339
Amortization of debt expense                   916            815            695            322            429
Amortization of capitalized interest         4,990          4,993          5,013          4,736          4,663
Portion of rent under long-term
  operating leases representative
  of an interest factor                     66,590         65,896         64,161         62,691         65,243
                                         ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------

Earnings Available for Fixed Charges     $ 128,014      $  28,546      $  93,421      $  69,914      $ 262,819
                                         =========      =========      =========      =========      =========


Fixed Charges:
Interest on indebtedness                    45,164         46,261         47,432         36,043         16,339
Amortization of debt expense                   916            815            695            322            429
Portion of rent under long-term
  operating leases representative
  of an interest factor                     66,590         65,896         64,161         62,691         65,243
                                         ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------

Total Fixed Charges                      $ 112,670      $ 112,972      $ 112,288      $  99,056      $  82,011
                                         =========      =========      =========      =========      =========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges            1.14           0.25           0.83           0.71           3.20
                                         =========      =========      =========      =========      =========

Coverage deficiency                             --      $  84,426      $  18,867      $  29,142             --
                                         =========      =========      =========      =========      =========
</TABLE>
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 557 

Designating September 2016 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself and Mr. BOOKER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2016 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

Whereas approximately 480,000 public and private school 

buses carry 26,000,000 children to and from school every 

weekday in the United States; 

Whereas America’s 480,000 public and private school buses 

comprise the largest mass transportation fleet in the Nation; 

Whereas during the school year, school buses make more 

than 55,000,000 passenger trips daily and students ride 

these school buses 10,000,000,000 times per year as the 

Nation’s fleet travels over 5,600,000,000 miles per school 

year; 

Whereas in an average year, about 25 school children are 

killed in school bus accidents, with one-third of these children struck by their own school buses in loading/unloadVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:50 Sep 13, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR557.ATS SR557

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 557 ATS 

ing zones, one-third struck by motorists who fail to stop 

for school buses, and one-third killed as they approach or 

depart a school bus stop; 

Whereas The Child Safety Network, celebrating 28 years of 

national public service, has collaborated with the National 

PTA and the school bus industry to create public service 

announcements to reduce distracted driving near school 

buses, increase ridership, and provide free resources to 

school districts in order to increase driver safety training, 

provide free technology for tracking school buses, reduce 

on-board bullying, and educate students; and 

Whereas the adoption of School Bus Safety Month will allow 

broadcast and digital media and social networking industries to make commitments to disseminate public service 

announcements designed to save children’s lives by making motorists aware of school bus safety issues: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates September 

2 2016 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 27, 2020

No. 04-19-00878-CR

Thomas Robert GILCHRIST,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-04-13013-CR

Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On December 19, 2019, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal seeking to appeal an 

order that denied his “Pretrial Motion to Dismiss Prosecution with Prejudice” and “Motion to 

Dismiss Abuse-Prosecutorial Misconduct” signed on December 16, 2019. On January 17, 2020, 

the district clerk filed the clerk’s record, which contained the December 16, 2019 order but did 

not include a judgment of conviction. 

In general, we have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant only when 

the trial court has signed a judgment of conviction. McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 

(Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (citing Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1961)). We do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that 

jurisdiction has been expressly granted to us by law. Id. 

Because there is no judgment of conviction, we ORDER appellant to file a response 

showing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction by February 26, 2020.

appellant fails to satisfactorily respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to 

establish this court’s jurisdiction, appellant must ask the district clerk to prepare one and notify 

this court that such a request was made. All deadlines in this matter are suspended until further 

order of the court.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court, all 

counsel, appellant, and the court reporter. 
_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26283]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 28, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 553 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-178, K2025-176.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26283 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 14, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 31, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 608 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-251, K2025-249.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26368 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# CA2009086EN.01S00301.xml

| 15.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 86/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 86/s3

---

REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 9 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | (IT) |
| 12 | (DE/FR) |
| 13 | |
| 14 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 16 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 17 | (BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO) |
| 20 | |
| 21 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 23 | |
| 24 | (DE/FR/NL) |
| 25 | (BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO) |
| 28 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 34 | (FR) |
| 36 | (GA/EN) |
| 37 | |
| 38 | |
| 39 | (SV) |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | (EN) |
| 45 | |
| 46 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 47 | |
| 52 | (DA/FI/MT) |
| 58 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 59 | (DE/EN/ES/FR/PT/SV) |
| 62 | (BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 63 | |
| 70 | |
| 71 | |
| 75 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 80 | (FR) |
| 84 | (BG/RO) |
| 86 | |

9

(DE/EN/FR)

10

(IT)

12

(DE/FR)

13

14

(DE/EN/FR)

16

(DE/EN/FR)

17

(BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO)

20

21

(DE/EN/FR)

23

24

(DE/FR/NL)

25

(BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO)

28

(DE/EN/FR)

34

(FR)

36

(GA/EN)

37

38

39

(SV)

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

(EN)

45

46

(DE/EN/FR)

47

52

(DA/FI/MT)

58

(DE/EN/FR)

59

(DE/EN/ES/FR/PT/SV)

62

(BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK)

63

70

71

75

(DE/EN/FR)

80

(FR)

84

(BG/RO)

86

---
#### In the Matter of the Guardianship of Robert P. Lewis and Another, Infants.

Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County,

February 24, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Siben & Siben*for petitioner. *James Schultz*for objectant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ernest L. Signorelli, S.

In these contested guardianship proceedings, the parties have settled their differences, pursuant to the terms of a stipulation of settlement filed with the court providing, *inter alia,*that the pending proceedings be converted to applications for the appointment of the petitioner as donee of a power to manage the infants’ funds during their minority.

*944The petitioner herein is the infants’ paternal grandmother. The infants’ father died, testate, on the 8th day of November 1985, and their mother is still alive.

Pursuant to the provisions of his last will and testament, the infants’ father devised and bequeathed his entire estate in equal shares per stirpes to his two children, and nominated and appointed his mother as guardian of their property. As a consequence thereof, on the 22nd day of April 1987, the infants’ paternal grandmother petitioned the court for the issuance to her of letters of guardianship of the property of the infants’ funds derived from their late father’s estate. Subsequent thereto, on the 29th day of June 1987, the infants’ mother filed objections to the relief requested by the petitioner, and simultaneously cross-petitioned for the issuance to her of letters of guardianship of the property of the infants.

Thereafter, the matter was settled in accordance with the terms of a stipulation of settlement filed with the court providing, *inter alia,*for the appointment of the infants’ paternal grandmother as donee of a power in trust with respect to the property of the infants.

SCPA 1714 provides as follows: "The donee of a power to manage during minority property vested in an infant resulting from an ineffectual attempt by will or deed to appoint the donee as guardian shall be subject to the provisions of this article. In respect of such property he shall have all the rights and duties of a guardian and shall be entitled to receive the commissions allowed to a guardian.” Therefore, where a testator nominates someone, other than a surviving parent, as guardian of his children, such appointment is ineffective, and instead, vests in the nominee the power to manage the infants’ funds during their minority, with the same rights and duties attendant thereto as a guardian of the property. *(See also,*Domestic Relations Law § 81.)

Accordingly, Gladys Lewis, the infants’ paternal grandmother, is hereby appointed donee of a power to manage the infants’ property during their minority, and, in such capacity, is hereby directed to collect and receive all funds passing to the infants pursuant to the terms of the decedent’s will, and to hold such funds jointly with the Chief Clerk of the Surrogate’s Court, in accordance with the provisions of SCPA article 17.
Exhibit
31.1





MANAGING
GENERAL PARTNER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Edward
B. Lipkin, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property Analysts Master
Limited Partnership;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
                  November 12, 2009By:
                  EBL&S, Inc., its managing general
      partnerBy:
                  /s/ Edward. B. LipkinName:
                  Edward
      B. LipkinTitle:
                  President
Amendment of the Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan



  
 Exhibit 10.1

 AMENDMENT 
 OF THE 
 THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED 

WESTWOOD HOLDINGS GROUP, INC. 
 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The Third Amended and Restated Westwood
Holdings Group, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended in the following respects, effective as of July 22, 2010. 
  

	 	1.	The last two sentences of Section 9.2 of the Plan are deleted in their entirety. 


 

	 	2.	The following new sentences are added at the end of Section 9.2 of the Plan: 

 “The Committee may provide that no dividends or dividend equivalents will be paid or accrued with respect to outstanding shares of Restricted Stock. If the Committee determines that dividends will be
payable with respect to shares of Restricted Stock, then, unless the Committee determines otherwise, and subject to such claw back or other conditions as the Committee may impose, the dividends will be payable currently to the holder of such
Restricted Stock. If the Committee determines that dividends on shares of Restricted Stock will be subject to vesting conditions (e.g., to the vesting conditions applicable to the corresponding shares of Restricted Stock), then such dividends will
be forfeited if and to the extent such vesting conditions are not satisfied. If the Committee determines that dividends with respect to Restricted Stock will be paid in the form of additional shares of Restricted Stock, then the Committee may, in
its sole discretion, cause the Company to register in the name of a Participant a stock certificate representing such shares of Restricted Stock issued as a dividend, and may cause the Company to hold such certificate in custody for the
Participant’s account subject to the applicable vesting and other terms and conditions. Upon a forfeiture of any shares of Restricted Stock (including, without limitation, shares of Restricted Stock issued as dividends), such forfeited shares
of Restricted Stock shall be transferred to the Company without further action by the Participant.” 
 This amendment has
been adopted by the Board of Directors of Westwood Holdings, Group, Inc. on the date first above written.
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

 Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket No. 11-1734

CALPINE CORPORATION, and its 

successors,

Respondent.

BRIEFING NOTICE 

The Commission requests that the parties brief the issues raised in the Secretary’s petition 

for discretionary review and the Respondent’s conditional petition for discretionary review. The 

parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item is before the Commission 

for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. Accordingly, the parties 

may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief is asked to notify 

the Commission of its intent in writing within the applicable time for filing briefs and serve a 

copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of intent) of opposing 

parties shall commence on the date of service. 

 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: June 26, 2013 /s/ 

Ray H. Darling, Jr. 

Executive Secretary

 

1

 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
Back to Contents

Exhibit 12.a

Certification CEO

|I,G.J. Wijers,
      certify that:
|----------------------------------
|                                  
|1.                                
|2.                                
|3.                                
|4.                                
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|5.                                
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  

| | Date: | June 22, 2006 |  | By:    | /s/
G.J. Wijers                     | 
| | ----- | ------------- |  | ------ | ----------------------------------- | 
| |       |               |  |        |                                     | 
| |       |               |  | Name:  | G.J. Wijers                         | 
| |       |               |  |        |                                     | 
| |       |               |  | Title: | Chairman of the Board of Management | 
| |       |               |  |        |                                     | 

---