# Official Journal C 191/8 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 191 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 638 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 191

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 638 June 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2020/C 191/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2020/C 191/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 191/02 | Case C-935/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu (Poland) lodged on 23 December 2019 — Grupa Warzywna Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu | 2 |
| 2020/C 191/03 | Case C-949/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 31 December 2019 — M.A. v Konsul Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w N. | 2 |
| 2020/C 191/04 | Case C-19/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku (Poland) lodged on 16 January 2020 — I.W. and R.W. v Bank BPH Spółka Akcyjna | 3 |
| 2020/C 191/05 | Case C-29/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 23 January 2020 — Biofa AG v Sikma D. Vertriebs GmbH und Co. KG | 4 |
| 2020/C 191/06 | Case C-45/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2020 — E v Finanzamt N | 4 |
| 2020/C 191/07 | Case C-46/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2020 — Z v Finanzamt G | 5 |
| 2020/C 191/08 | Case C-48/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 28 January 2020 — UAB ‘P’ v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Białymstoku | 6 |
| 2020/C 191/09 | Case C-55/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Dyscyplinarny Izby Adwokackiej w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 31 January 2020 — Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości v R.G. | 6 |
| 2020/C 191/10 | Case C-58/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Austria) lodged on 4 February 2020 — K v Finanzamt Linz | 8 |
| 2020/C 191/11 | Case C-59/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Austria) lodged on 4 February 2020 — DBKAG v Finanzamt Linz | 8 |
| 2020/C 191/12 | Case C-73/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 13 February 2020 — ZM in his capacity as liquidator in the insolvency proceedings relating to Oeltrans Befrachtungsgesellschaft mbH v E.A. Frerichs | 9 |
| 2020/C 191/13 | Case C-103/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 27 February 2020 — RC v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira | 9 |
| 2020/C 191/14 | Case C-129/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg) lodged on 9 March 2020 — XI v Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants | 10 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 191/15 | Case T-546/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — Isigny-Sainte Mère v EUIPO (Shape of a golden container with a type of wave) (EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a golden container with a type of wave — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character) | 12 |
| 2020/C 191/16 | Case T-31/19: Order of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — AF v FRA (Action for annulment and damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Duties as an administrator as a policy adviser in grade AD 12 — Assignment to the type of post ‘administrator’ — 2014 Staff Regulations — No eligibility for reclassification in the grade above — 2017 reclassification exercise — Refusal to consider the applicant for the purposes of his reclassification in grade AD 13 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 12 |
| 2020/C 191/17 | Case T-60/19: Order of the General Court of 9 March 2020 — Republic of Cyprus v EUIPO — Filotas Bellas & Yios (Halloumi Vermion) (EU trade mark — Cancellation of the trade mark on which the application for a declaration of invalidity is based — No need to adjudicate) | 13 |
| 2020/C 191/18 | Case T-155/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — AP v EIF (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — EIF Staff — Tendering by the member of staff of her resignation for personal reasons — Leave due to serious illness starting before the end date of the employment contract chosen by the member of staff — Application for withdrawal of the resignation after the end date of the employment contract chosen by the member of staff — EIF’s refusal to accept the retroactive withdrawal of the resignation — End date of the contract delayed on account of sick leave — Whether Article 33 of the EIF Staff Regulations is applicable — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 14 |
| 2020/C 191/19 | Case T-280/19: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2020 — Highgate Capital Management v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Complaint — Measure not open to challenge — Inadmissibility) | 14 |
| 2020/C 191/20 | Case T-326/19: Order of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — Gerber v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Customs territory of the European Union — Regulation (EU) 2019/474 — Directive (EU) 2019/475 — Inclusion of the municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano — Not individually concerned — Inadmissibility) | 15 |
| 2020/C 191/21 | Case T-499/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — ZU v EEAS (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Sick leave — Negative opinion by the medical service — Amendments made in the Human Resource Management information system — Acts not amenable to review — Acts not adversely affecting an official — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Premature challenge — Inadmissibility) | 16 |
| 2020/C 191/22 | Case T-505/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — Merly v Parliament (Action for annulment — Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistant — Special leave for the birth of children born via surrogacy — Answer to a request for information — No act adversely affecting an official — Inadmissibility) | 17 |
| 2020/C 191/23 | Case T-597/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin kaupunki v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency) | 17 |
| 2020/C 191/24 | Case T-814/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2020 — Nutravita v EUIPO — Pegaso (nutravita Healthy Mind, Body & Soul.) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate) | 18 |
| 2020/C 191/25 | Case T-96/20: Action brought on 20 February 2020 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v EUIPO (Limbic® Types) | 18 |
| 2020/C 191/26 | Case T-119/20: Action brought on 24 February 2020 — IN v EASME | 19 |
| 2020/C 191/27 | Case T-127/20: Action brought on 27 February 2020 — France v ECHA | 20 |
| 2020/C 191/28 | Case T-152/20: Action brought on 19 March 2020 — BSH Hausgeräte v EUIPO (Home Connect) | 21 |
| 2020/C 191/29 | Case T-153/20: Action brought on 19 March 2020 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LIGHTYOGA) | 22 |
| 2020/C 191/30 | Case T-157/20: Action brought on 19 March 2020 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LICHTYOGA) | 22 |
| 2020/C 191/31 | Case T-158/20: Action brought on 20 March 2020 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Yuneec Europe (Breeze) | 23 |
| 2020/C 191/32 | Case T-163/20: Action brought on 2 April 2020 — Isopix v Parliament | 24 |
| 2020/C 191/33 | Case T-168/20: Action brought on 20 March 2020 — Creaton South-East Europe v EUIPO — Henkel (CREATHERM) | 25 |
| 2020/C 191/34 | Case T-169/20: Action brought on 23 March 2020 — Marina Yachting Brand Management Company v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear Company (MARINA YACHTING) | 25 |
| 2020/C 191/35 | Case T-170/20: Action brought on 18 March 2020 — Rochefort v Parliament | 26 |
| 2020/C 191/36 | Case T-171/20: Action brought on 18 March 2020 — Rochefort v Parliament | 27 |
| 2020/C 191/37 | Case T-172/20: Action brought on 18 March 2020 — Rochefort v Parliament | 28 |
| 2020/C 191/38 | Case T-173/20: Action brought on 23 March 2020 — Henry Cotton’s Brand Management Company v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear Company (Henry Cotton’s) | 28 |
| 2020/C 191/39 | Case T-176/20: Action brought on 30 March 2020 — Sam McKnight v EUIPO — Carolina Herrera (COOL GIRL) | 29 |
| 2020/C 191/40 | Case T-177/20: Action brought on 30 March 2020 — Himmel v EUIPO — Ramirez Monfort (Hispano Suiza) | 30 |
| 2020/C 191/41 | Case T-178/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Bavaria Weed v EUIPO (BavariaWeed) | 30 |
| 2020/C 191/42 | Case T-181/20: Action brought on 31 March 2020 — Griba v CPVO (Stark Gugger) | 31 |
| 2020/C 191/43 | Case T-182/20: Action brought on 31 March 2020 — Griba v CPVO (Gala Perathoner) | 32 |
| 2020/C 191/44 | Case T-183/20: Action brought on 7 April 2020 — Schneider v EUIPO — Raths (Teslaplatte) | 32 |
| 2020/C 191/45 | Case T-185/20: Action brought on 31 March 2020 — Tikal Marine Systems v EUIPO — Ultra Safety Systems (Tikal Tef-Gel) | 33 |
| 2020/C 191/46 | Case T-186/20: Action brought on 3 April 2020 — Chatwal v EUIPO — Timehouse Capital (THE TIME) | 34 |
| 2020/C 191/47 | Case T-187/20: Action brought on 9 April 2020 — Davide Groppi v EUIPO — Viabizzuno (Lamps) | 35 |
| 2020/C 191/48 | Case T-189/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Chiquita Brands v EUIPO — Fyffes International (HOYA) | 35 |
| 2020/C 191/49 | Case T-190/20: Action brought on 7 April 2020 — Almea v EUIPO — Sanacorp Pharmahandel (Almea) | 36 |
| 2020/C 191/50 | Case T-192/20: Action brought on 9 April 2020 — Tikal Marine Systems v EUIPO — Ultra Safety Systems (Ultra Tef-Gel) | 37 |
| 2020/C 191/51 | Case T-201/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Berebene v EUIPO — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (GHISU) | 38 |
| 2020/C 191/52 | Case T-208/20: Action brought on 9 April 2020 — JH v Europol | 38 |
| 2020/C 191/53 | Case T-212/20: Action brought on 17 April 2020 — Gaz-System v ACER | 39 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 191/02

Case C-935/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu (Poland) lodged on 23 December 2019 — Grupa Warzywna Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu

2

2020/C 191/03

Case C-949/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 31 December 2019 — M.A. v Konsul Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w N.

2

2020/C 191/04

Case C-19/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku (Poland) lodged on 16 January 2020 — I.W. and R.W. v Bank BPH Spółka Akcyjna

3

2020/C 191/05

Case C-29/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 23 January 2020 — Biofa AG v Sikma D. Vertriebs GmbH und Co. KG

4

2020/C 191/06

Case C-45/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2020 — E v Finanzamt N

4

2020/C 191/07

Case C-46/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2020 — Z v Finanzamt G

5

2020/C 191/08

Case C-48/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 28 January 2020 — UAB ‘P’ v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Białymstoku

6

2020/C 191/09

Case C-55/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Dyscyplinarny Izby Adwokackiej w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 31 January 2020 — Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości v R.G.

6

2020/C 191/10

Case C-58/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Austria) lodged on 4 February 2020 — K v Finanzamt Linz

8

2020/C 191/11

Case C-59/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Austria) lodged on 4 February 2020 — DBKAG v Finanzamt Linz

8

2020/C 191/12

Case C-73/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 13 February 2020 — ZM in his capacity as liquidator in the insolvency proceedings relating to Oeltrans Befrachtungsgesellschaft mbH v E.A. Frerichs

9

2020/C 191/13

Case C-103/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 27 February 2020 — RC v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

9

2020/C 191/14

Case C-129/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg) lodged on 9 March 2020 — XI v Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants

10

General Court

2020/C 191/15

Case T-546/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — Isigny-Sainte Mère v EUIPO (Shape of a golden container with a type of wave) (EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a golden container with a type of wave — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character)

12

2020/C 191/16

Case T-31/19: Order of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — AF v FRA (Action for annulment and damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Duties as an administrator as a policy adviser in grade AD 12 — Assignment to the type of post ‘administrator’ — 2014 Staff Regulations — No eligibility for reclassification in the grade above — 2017 reclassification exercise — Refusal to consider the applicant for the purposes of his reclassification in grade AD 13 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

12

2020/C 191/17

Case T-60/19: Order of the General Court of 9 March 2020 — Republic of Cyprus v EUIPO — Filotas Bellas & Yios (Halloumi Vermion) (EU trade mark — Cancellation of the trade mark on which the application for a declaration of invalidity is based — No need to adjudicate)

13

2020/C 191/18

Case T-155/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — AP v EIF (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — EIF Staff — Tendering by the member of staff of her resignation for personal reasons — Leave due to serious illness starting before the end date of the employment contract chosen by the member of staff — Application for withdrawal of the resignation after the end date of the employment contract chosen by the member of staff — EIF’s refusal to accept the retroactive withdrawal of the resignation — End date of the contract delayed on account of sick leave — Whether Article 33 of the EIF Staff Regulations is applicable — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

14

2020/C 191/19

Case T-280/19: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2020 — Highgate Capital Management v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Complaint — Measure not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)

14

2020/C 191/20

Case T-326/19: Order of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — Gerber v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Customs territory of the European Union — Regulation (EU) 2019/474 — Directive (EU) 2019/475 — Inclusion of the municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano — Not individually concerned — Inadmissibility)

15

2020/C 191/21

Case T-499/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — ZU v EEAS (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Sick leave — Negative opinion by the medical service — Amendments made in the Human Resource Management information system — Acts not amenable to review — Acts not adversely affecting an official — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Premature challenge — Inadmissibility)

16

2020/C 191/22

Case T-505/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — Merly v Parliament (Action for annulment — Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistant — Special leave for the birth of children born via surrogacy — Answer to a request for information — No act adversely affecting an official — Inadmissibility)

17

2020/C 191/23

Case T-597/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin kaupunki v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)

17

2020/C 191/24

Case T-814/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2020 — Nutravita v EUIPO — Pegaso (nutravita Healthy Mind, Body & Soul.) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

18

2020/C 191/25

Case T-96/20: Action brought on 20 February 2020 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v EUIPO (Limbic® Types)

18

2020/C 191/26

Case T-119/20: Action brought on 24 February 2020 — IN v EASME

19

2020/C 191/27

Case T-127/20: Action brought on 27 February 2020 — France v ECHA

20

2020/C 191/28

Case T-152/20: Action brought on 19 March 2020 — BSH Hausgeräte v EUIPO (Home Connect)

21

2020/C 191/29

Case T-153/20: Action brought on 19 March 2020 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LIGHTYOGA)

22

2020/C 191/30

Case T-157/20: Action brought on 19 March 2020 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LICHTYOGA)

22

2020/C 191/31

Case T-158/20: Action brought on 20 March 2020 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Yuneec Europe (Breeze)

23

2020/C 191/32

Case T-163/20: Action brought on 2 April 2020 — Isopix v Parliament

24

2020/C 191/33

Case T-168/20: Action brought on 20 March 2020 — Creaton South-East Europe v EUIPO — Henkel (CREATHERM)

25

2020/C 191/34

Case T-169/20: Action brought on 23 March 2020 — Marina Yachting Brand Management Company v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear Company (MARINA YACHTING)

25

2020/C 191/35

Case T-170/20: Action brought on 18 March 2020 — Rochefort v Parliament

26

2020/C 191/36

Case T-171/20: Action brought on 18 March 2020 — Rochefort v Parliament

27

2020/C 191/37

Case T-172/20: Action brought on 18 March 2020 — Rochefort v Parliament

28

2020/C 191/38

Case T-173/20: Action brought on 23 March 2020 — Henry Cotton’s Brand Management Company v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear Company (Henry Cotton’s)

28

2020/C 191/39

Case T-176/20: Action brought on 30 March 2020 — Sam McKnight v EUIPO — Carolina Herrera (COOL GIRL)

29

2020/C 191/40

Case T-177/20: Action brought on 30 March 2020 — Himmel v EUIPO — Ramirez Monfort (Hispano Suiza)

30

2020/C 191/41

Case T-178/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Bavaria Weed v EUIPO (BavariaWeed)

30

2020/C 191/42

Case T-181/20: Action brought on 31 March 2020 — Griba v CPVO (Stark Gugger)

31

2020/C 191/43

Case T-182/20: Action brought on 31 March 2020 — Griba v CPVO (Gala Perathoner)

32

2020/C 191/44

Case T-183/20: Action brought on 7 April 2020 — Schneider v EUIPO — Raths (Teslaplatte)

32

2020/C 191/45

Case T-185/20: Action brought on 31 March 2020 — Tikal Marine Systems v EUIPO — Ultra Safety Systems (Tikal Tef-Gel)

33

2020/C 191/46

Case T-186/20: Action brought on 3 April 2020 — Chatwal v EUIPO — Timehouse Capital (THE TIME)

34

2020/C 191/47

Case T-187/20: Action brought on 9 April 2020 — Davide Groppi v EUIPO — Viabizzuno (Lamps)

35

2020/C 191/48

Case T-189/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Chiquita Brands v EUIPO — Fyffes International (HOYA)

35

2020/C 191/49

Case T-190/20: Action brought on 7 April 2020 — Almea v EUIPO — Sanacorp Pharmahandel (Almea)

36

2020/C 191/50

Case T-192/20: Action brought on 9 April 2020 — Tikal Marine Systems v EUIPO — Ultra Safety Systems (Ultra Tef-Gel)

37

2020/C 191/51

Case T-201/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Berebene v EUIPO — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (GHISU)

38

2020/C 191/52

Case T-208/20: Action brought on 9 April 2020 — JH v Europol

38

2020/C 191/53

Case T-212/20: Action brought on 17 April 2020 — Gaz-System v ACER

39

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN