alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







Aceto Corporation




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-149586, 33-38679, 333-90929 and 333-110653) of Aceto Corporation of our reports dated September 10, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of Aceto Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, which are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated September 10, 2010 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.













BDO USA, LLP





Melville, New York


September 10, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 12, 2020

b 0611 

# Order

Clerk June 12, 2020

161433 & (26)

BRENDA STUMBO and LARRY DOE,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 161433

COA: 353695

Washtenaw CC: 20

- 000443

- CZ

KAREN LOVEJOY ROE,

Defendant,

and

HEATHER JARRELL ROE,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The

application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Innkeepers USA Trust (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Dennis M. Craven, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 9, 2007



/s/ Dennis M. CravenDennis M. CravenChief Financial Officer
Order entered October 21, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00259-CR

TRAVIS WAYNE CARROLL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-41119-H

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s October 19, 2014 motion to extend time to file his brief 

as follows. We ORDER appellant to file, by NOVEMBER 20, 2014, either appellant’s a 

motion to dismiss the appeal that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). If 

neither a brief nor a motion to dismiss is filed by that date, the Court will order the trial court to 

make findings regarding the status of the appeal.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Property Analysts Master
Limited Partnership ("NPAMLP") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David A. Simon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
EBL&S Property Management, Inc., Agent for NPAMLP and the equivalent of its
Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NPAMLP.

                          NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                          ----------------------------------------------------
                          (Registrant)

                          Date: May 17, 2006
                                ------------
                          By: EBL&S Property Management, Inc., Agent for NPAMLP
                              -------------------------------------------------

                          By: /s/ David A. Simon
                              ------------------
                              Name:  David A. Simon
                              Title: Vice President
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  March 16, 2011 | /s/ Li Shaoming                       |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                             | Li Shaoming                           |
|                             | Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                             | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  March 16, 2011 | /s/ Weiqiu Dong                          |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                             | Weiqiu Dong                              |
|                             | Chief Financial Officer                  |
|                             | (Chief Accounting and Financial Officer) |

----
##### 



Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation for the quarter ended March 31,
2003, I, Thomas E. Legro, Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer of Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2003 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                               
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation.

|             |  |                                           
|------------ |  | ------------------------------------------
|May 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Thomas E. Legro                       
|             |  | Thomas E. Legro                           
|             |  | Vice President, Controller and            
|             |  | Chief Accounting Officer                  
|             |  | Indiantown CogenerationFunding Corporation

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation and will be retained by
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
No. 81—2195.

#### The Pennsylvania Co. v. Chandler S. Redfield et al.

This was an action by appellant against appellees as sureties upon the bond of one Broomhall, for the faithful performance of the duties of the latter as agent of appellant at Englewood, in this county. The breach assigned was the failure of said Broomhall to pay over to the proper agent of the appellant the sum of three thousand dollars, which had come into the hands of said Broomhall as agent of appellant, at Englewood, aforesaid; which breach the defendants traversed by plea. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and the court- found the issues for plaintiff -; the debt,, the penalty mentioned in the bond, and damages in the sum of fifteen hundred and nineteen dollars; upon which finding judgment in proper form was given. The plaintiff brings the case here by appeal, and assigns for error, that the amount of damages found should have been larger. The court is of opinion that appellant’s counsel have failed to point out of the complicated mass of evidence in the record, the evidence which demonstrates the error relied upon. The mere conclusion of witnesses upon a question which the court, sitting in the place of a jury, was just as competent to determine as theysvitnesses, will not suffice to establish that clear weight and preponderance required by *639our practice to justify the interference of an appellate court, with the findings of the court below, when sitting for the determination of facts, or the verdict of a jury.

Judge below, Joseph E. Gary.

Attorneys, for appellant, Messrs. Willard & Driggs ;

for appellee, Messrs. C. H. & C. B. Wood, and Mr. A. H. Yeeder.

Opinion filed Jan. 6, 1886.

Opinion by McAllister, J.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Toni Jones, Charlene Spells, Ketan Patel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

FROM: Jason Huckaby, Eastern Research Group, Inc.

DATE: August 12, 2010

SUBJECT: Teleconference Meeting Summary with Reusable Industrial Packaging 

Association (RIPA) 

INTRODUCTION

A telephone conference between representatives of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

and the Reusable Industrial Packaging Association (RIPA) was held so that RIPA could present 

their comments and concerns on the proposed Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste 

Incineration (CISWI) emission guidelines and new source performance standards.

ATTENDEES

C.L. Pettit, RIPA

Larry Bierlein, RIPA Counsel

Kay Rykowski, Industrial Container Services, LLC (RIPA member representative)

Toni Wyche Jones, EPA

Ketan Patel, EPA

Charlene Spells, EPA

Paul Versace, EPA

Robin Dunkins, EPA

Jason Huckaby, ERG

TIME and DATE

10:30 to 11:00 AM on August 9, 2010

AGENDA

See Attached agenda prepared by RIPA.

DISCUSSION SUMMARY

The meeting discussion followed the agenda, opening with an introduction of attendees. 

Principle talking points are summarized below.
2

Attachment: Agenda

Teleconference Call

Monday August 9, 2010

10:30 am – 11:00 am

Dial (919) 541 – 4332 (no PIN or Passcode needed)

U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation (Research Triangle Park, NC)

and

Reusable Industrial Packaging Association

Re: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units (CISWI)

NPRM June 4, 2010; 75 Fed. Reg. 31937

I. Introductions

II. Drum Furnaces are not Ovens

III. Materials Throughput is not Comparable

IV. Was EPA’s Methodology in Calculating Limits Flawed?

V. Cost Impacts Were Grossly Underestimated

VI. Applicability of December Deadline

VII. Emptied Drums in Reconditioning Networks Are Not Discarded

VIII. Jobs Impact 

IX. Conclusion
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

Order 

August 6, 2009 

139300-2 

_________________________________________ 

In re ARMON MARCUS TAVORN, Minor. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 139300 

 COA: 287495 

Macomb CC Family Division: 

2006-000358-NA 

ANNA MOZELLA TAVORN, 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

RAFAEL CHAPMAN and BENNIE MITCHELL, 

Respondents. 

_________________________________________ 

In re JANET ARIELA TAVORN, Minor. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 139301 

 COA: 287497 

Macomb CC Family Division: 

2006-000359-NA 

ANNA MOZELLA TAVORN, 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

RAFAEL CHAPMAN and BENNIE MITCHELL, 

Respondents. 

_________________________________________ 
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

s0804 

 

2

In re JORDAN RITCHIE TAVORN, Minor. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 139302 

 COA: 287498 

Macomb CC Family Division: 

2008-000023-NA 

ANNA MOZELLA TAVORN, 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

RAFAEL CHAPMAN and BENNIE MITCHELL, 

Respondents. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                  A.S.V., INC.
                 EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Three Months Ended                  Nine Months Ended
                                                                       September 30,                      September 30,
                                                                       -------------                      -------------
BASIC                                                              2001             2000             2001              2000
                                                                   ----             ----             ----              ----
<S>                                                           <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>
   Earnings
     Net earnings                                             $      92,882     $     220,156    $     387,626     $   1,236,225
                                                              =============     =============    =============     =============
   Shares
     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding                                        10,224,760         9,701,541       10,215,205         9,696,413
                                                              =============     =============    =============     =============

   Basic earnings per common share                            $         .01     $         .02    $         .04     $         .13
                                                              =============     =============    =============     =============

DILUTED
   Earnings
     Net earnings                                             $      92,882     $     220,156    $     387,626     $   1,236,225
                                                              =============     =============    =============     =============
   Shares
     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding                                        10,224,760         9,701,541       10,215,205         9,696,413
     Assuming exercise of options and warrants
       reduced by the number of shares which could
       have been purchased with the proceeds from
       the exercise of such options and warrants                    220,538           193,346          151,281           212,185
                                                              -------------     -------------    -------------     -------------

     Weighted average number of common and
       common equivalent shares outstanding                      10,445,298         9,894,887       10,366,486         9,908,598
                                                              =============     =============    =============     =============

   Diluted earnings per common share                          $         .01     $         .02    $         .04     $         .12
                                                              =============     =============    =============     =============
</Table>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000926978
<NAME>                        Frederick Brewing Co.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         208,292
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  777,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                   35,076
<INVENTORY>                                    840,836
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,032,015
<PP&E>                                         12,261,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                 938,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,597,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,825,147
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,041,796
<COMMON>                                       464
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,823,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,597,527
<SALES>                                        2,309,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,309,102
<CGS>                                          1,779,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,779,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,990,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             210,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,672,007)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,672,007)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.34)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1288]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
NOMINATIONS
Committee on Armed Services: Committee ordered favorably reported 795 
nominations in the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps.
```
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket No. 16-0940

ANGEL BROTHERS ENTERPRISES, LTD.,

Respondent.

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief the issues presented in the Respondent’s petition for

discretionary review. The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item

are before the Commission on review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to

review. Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party that does not intend to file a brief must notify the

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: December 15, 2017 /s/

John X. Cerveny

Executive Secretary

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1566/2005

of 26 September 2005         

fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Jordan

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 of 21 December 1987 fixing conditions for the application of preferential customs duties on imports of certain flowers originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (1), and in particular Article 5(2)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Community producer and import prices for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses as referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 shall be as set out in the Annex hereto for the period from 28 September to 11 October 2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 September 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 382, 31.12.1987, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/97 (OJ L 177, 5.7.1997, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 72, 18.3.1988, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2062/97 (OJ L 289, 22.10.1997, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 346, 31.12.2003, p. 65.

(4)OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 117.

(5)OJ L 2, 5.1.2005, p. 4.

----

ANNEX

----