alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the
annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report
or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


By          /s/ WALTER C. JOHNSEN
         ------------------------------
                Walter C. Johnsen
                 President and
             Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 10, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and will
be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6080

CARL BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-1403-PJM)

Submitted: April 21, 1998 Decided: June 22, 1998

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1403-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 5,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2303]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        TRIBUTE TO MELVIN McCREE

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. DALE E. KILDEE

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. KILDEE. Madam Speaker, I rise today to honor Melvin Phillip 
McCree. Melvin passed away on November 12th following a long illness 
and a tribute will be held tomorrow in remembrance of his life and 
work.
  After graduating from Flint Northern High School, where he was the 
Student Council President, Melvin went on to graduate from Mott 
Community College. He continued his studies at Western Michigan 
University and the University of Michigan-Flint. In 1981 he was elected 
to the Flint City Council for the Fifth Ward. During his service on the 
Council, he was elected to a record-setting 5 consecutive terms as 
Council President.
  Appointed to the position of Register of Deeds in 1990, Melvin was 
re-elected for 4 more terms. During the 18 years he served as Register 
of Deeds, Melvin sought to bring the office into the 21st century. He 
was diligent in implementing new technologies to provide better service 
to the public. Melvin developed an office website, a system to scan and 
store all documents digitally, and the ability to provide documents to 
the public in a variety of media. Through his foresight, the Genesee 
County Register of Deeds office is a model for other county offices to 
image and store records.
  Melvin McCree was an enthusiastic, conscientious public servant, an 
insightful innovator, and a thoughtful humanitarian. I knew Melvin 
since he was a child and I watched him grow and develop into a good 
man, and a kind friend. I valued his counsel, his sense of humor, and 
his community spirit.
  Madam Speaker, I ask the House of Representatives to rise with me and 
honor Melvin Phillip McCree. The people of Genesee County have lost a 
dedicated public official and I mourn his passing.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 31(b)1**

**ALABAMA POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Charles D. McCrary, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Alabama Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 27, 2006

                  /s/Charles D. McCrary                  

Charles D. McCrary

President and Chief Executive Officer
#### MARGARET McCLENNAN v. ALEXANDER McCLEOD.

After a defendant lias entered a defence to an action of Ejectment, lie cannot be permitted to allege, that others are also in possession with him, and have the title and the sole possession. If such defendant meant to disavow any possession in himself, lie should not have entered any, de-fence.

*{Thomas*v. *Orrell,*5 Ired. 569; and *Judge*v. *Houston,*13 Ired. 108, cited and approved.)

This was an action of *Ejectment*instituted prior to the adoption of the C. C. P., and tried before Buxton, J., at *65Spring Term, 1876, of the Superior Court of Montgomeey County.

The record is voluminous, the declaration containing many counts, and a great deal of evidence was introduced.

The facts necessary to an understanding of the case as decided are stated in the opinion of the Court.

There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

*J. D. Mclver, Merrimon, Fuller & Ashe,*for the appellant;.

*Neill McKay*and *Pemberton,*contra.

Bynum, J.

All the other counts have been abandoned! except the count upon the demise of Farquhar Martin, and. by a former decision of this Court that demise has been-held to be sufficient to maintain this action. 70 N. C. Rep., 364. The lessor was a purchaser at sheriff's sale under a *fi. fa.*against the defendant. The defendant was living on the land at the time of the sale‘and at the beginning of. this action, and is still living on it. The defendant cannot defend, as he attempts to do, by setting up title in third persons. After entering a defence to the action, he-cannot be permitted to allege that others are also in possession with him and have the title and the sole possession. If. the person thus sued meant to disavow any possession in himself, he should not have entered any defence. *Doe ex. dem.; Thomas*v. *Orrell,*5 Ired., 569; *Judge*v. *Houston,*13 Ired., 108. These established principles are decisive of this case. The McDuffie tract of land only is in dispute in; this action. As to that, it appears that when the lessor of the plaintiff purchased, the defendant was only one of several heirs who inherited the land upon the death of John McLeod, who was known as *“*Bahama John.” If- that is so, the lessor of. the plaintiff, by the purchase of Alexander McLeod’s interest, became a tenant in common with the ■ other, heirs.. The,-*66judgment in this action cannot affect their rights, as they are not parties. The writ of possession upon the judgment to which the lessor of the'plaintiff i:s here entitled will be executed by him at his own peril.

The exceptions to the charge of his Honor are not tenable.There is no error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 375 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>
                                                       Calendar No. 398
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 375

                  Raising awareness of modern slavery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2016

   Mr. Corker (for himself, Mr. Cardin, and Mr. Coons) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

                             March 16, 2016

               Reported by Mr. Corker, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                  Raising awareness of modern slavery.

Whereas it is estimated that tens of millions of children, women, and men around 
        the world are subjected to conditions of modern slavery;
Whereas the International Labour Organization estimates that modern slavery 
        generates more than $150,000,000,000 in criminal profits each year;
Whereas despite being outlawed in every nation, modern slavery exists around the 
        world, including in the United States;
Whereas around the world, 55 percent of forced labor victims are women or girls, 
        and nearly 1 in 5 victims of slavery is a child; and
Whereas each year, individuals around the world join together to call for an end 
        to modern slavery by symbolically drawing a red ``X'' symbol on their 
        hands to share the message of the END IT movement: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends each individual that supports the END IT 
        movement on February 25, 2016;
            (2) notes the dedication of individuals, organizations, and 
        governments to end modern slavery; and
            (3) calls for concerted, international action to bring an 
        end to modern slavery around the world.

                                                       Calendar No. 398

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              S. RES. 375

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

                  Raising awareness of modern slavery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 16, 2016

                       Reported without amendment
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I,Leonard Borow, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aeroflex Incorporated,hereby certify that the Form 10-K of Aeroflex Incorporated for the periodended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Aeroflex Incorporated.

 

 
|   | /s/  Leonard Borow            |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                          |
|   | Name: Leonard Borow           |
|   |                          |
|   | Date: September 1,  2010 |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporatedand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
Exhibit 10.4

                             ACME UNITED CORPORATION

                               Severance Pay Plan

         This Severance Pay Plan shall apply to each officer of the Company at
the level of Vice President or above under the age of 65.

         The Policy pertains to the termination of employment or the equivalent
by the Company for any other reason than gross misconduct or having reached the
age of 65, the normal retirement age. This Plan applies unless the Salary
Continuation Plan applies. For purposes of this Policy, termination or
equivalent shall mean any of the following conditions:

         1. Employment is terminated involuntarily, including termination as a
            result of death but excluding termination as a result of disability.
         2. The equivalent of termination means: 1) that the responsibility,
            status, or compensation of the person is reduced or 2) transfer of
            the person to any unreasonably distant location from the current
            location.

         The severance benefit for any reason other than death shall be
determined on the basis of one month's salary for each year of service to the
Company. Except that the minimum number of months applies if it produces a
larger benefit. The severance benefit as a result of death of the Officer is one
months' salary times the number of months indicated below.

         Schedule of Benefits
                                                                Termination
         Officer level                          Death       Minimum     Maximum

         Director of the Company who            9 mos.      9 mos.      30 mos.
         is also an Officer of the Company
         at the level of Executive Vice
         President or above

         Senior Vice President and Vice         6 mos.      6 mos.      18 mos.
         President

                                       END

         Revised September 28, 2004
August 3, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 3rd day of August, 2016.

10-16-00168-CV	IN THE INTEREST OF K.L.T. AND T.K.T., CHILDREN - ON APPEAL FROM THE 66TH DISTRICT COURT OF HILL COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 50574 - DISMISSED – Memorandum Opinion by Justice Davis:

“This cause came on to be heard on the Court’s own motion to dismiss appeal, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of the Court that said appeal should be dismissed; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that said appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed.  It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 18, 2014

s0611 

# Order

Clerk June 18, 2014

148691

- 2

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148691

COA: 318888

Washtenaw CC: 12

- 001384

- FH

PAUL JOSEPH CREPS, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148692

COA: 318889

Washtenaw CC: 12

- 001557

- FH

PAUL JOSEPH CREPS, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2013

orders of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2335]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          EARMARK DECLARATION

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. DAVE WELDON

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, November 20, 2008

  Mr. WELDON of Florida. Madam Speaker, pursuant to the Republican 
Leadership standards on earmarks, I am submitting the following 
information for publication in the Congressional Record regarding 
earmarks I received as part of H.R. 2638, the Consolidated Security, 
Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009:
  Requesting Member: Rep. Dave Weldon (FL-15).
  Bill Number: H.R. 2638.
  Account: DOD, Other Procurement, Navy.
  Legal Name of Requesting Entity: Northrop Grumman Corp.
  Address of Requesting Entity: 1000 Wilson Blvd, Suite 2300, 
Arlington, VA 22209.
  Description of Request: ALMDS is a major technology innovation in 
Airborne Mine Countermeasures that will revolutionize the U.S. Navy's 
ability to rapidly detect and localize near-surface and moored mines in 
the littorals. ALMDS will provide Navy assured access to Pacific Rim 
and Middle East Littoral waters by providing wide-area, 3-D imagery 
capable of detecting and classifying types of mines.

                          ____________________
```
D1306 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST December 8, 2008 

S. 1193, to direct the Secretary of the Interior to 

take into trust 2 parcels of Federal land for the benefit of certain Indian Pueblos in the State of New 

Mexico, and for other purposes. Signed on December 

2, 2008. (Public Law 110–453) 

f 

COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR TUESDAY, 

DECEMBER 9, 2008 

(Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated) 

Senate 

No meetings/hearings scheduled. 

House 

Committee on Oversight and Government, hearing on The 

Role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the Financial Crisis; followed by a mark up of a Committee Report regarding President Bush’s assertion of executive privilege 

in response to the Committee subpoena to Attorney General Michael Mukasey, 10 a.m., 2154 Rayburn. 

Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, hearing entitled ‘‘The Energy Independence Implications of the Auto Bailout Proposal,’’ 10 a.m., 2175 Rayburn. 

CONGRESSIONAL PROGRAM AHEAD 

Week of December 9 through December 13, 

2008 

Senate Chamber 

On Tuesday, at 12 noon, Senate will resume consideration of S. 3297, Advancing America’s Priorities 

Act. 

During the balance of the week, Senate may consider any cleared legislative and executive business. 

Senate Committees 

(Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated) 

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: December 10, 

to hold hearings to examine investment in clean energy 

and natural resources projects and programs to create jobs 

and stimulate the economy, 9:30 p.m., SD–366. 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions: December 10, to hold hearings to examine prevention and 

public health, 10 a.m., SD–192. 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs: 

December 11, to hold hearings to examine a report from 

the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass 

Destruction, Proliferation, and Terrorism, 10 a.m., 

SH–216. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with DIGEST
#### Merten, Respondent, vs. Koester and another, Appellants.

*April 2*

June *4, 1929.*

*80For the appellants there was a brief by *Brennan, Lucas &*
      *81
      *McDonough*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *G. L. Mc-Donough.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Stern & Hersh,*and oral argument by *Willard A. Bowman,*all of Milwaukee.

Rosenberry, C. J.

The question presented is whether or not Exhibit 1, set out in the statement of facts, is a sufficient memorandum of the transaction to satisfy the statute of frauds, there having been no other writing between the parties. Sec. 240.08 provides:

> “Every contract for the leasing for a longer period than one year or for the sale of any lands or any interest in lands shall be void unless the contract or some'note or memorandum thereof, expressing the consideration, be in writing and be subscribed by the party by whom the lease or sale is to be made or by his lawfully authorized agent.”

It is considered that the memorandum is insufficient to comply with the statute of frauds and this case is within the rule of *Durkin v. Machesky, 177*Wis. 595, 188 N. W. 97. The memorandum does not express the consideration nor embody the agreement between the parties. A material and essential part of the agreement was the assumption of the mortgage by the purchaser. In the light of the surrounding circumstances it is apparent that the memorandum did not express the true agreement, nor is the bungalow which is to be given as a part of the purchase price sufficiently described to amount to a compliance with the statute. Having regard only to the terms of the instrument, the defendant Zetley seems to have no relation whatever to the transaction. *Harney v. Burhans,*91 Wis. 348, 64 N. W. 1031; *Wirthwein v. Dailey,*182 Wis. 200, 196 N. W. 221. The contract is therefore void and the judgment of the circuit court was right.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed,