Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2024 / Notices 89965 

17See APO and Service Final Rule. 

18See Thai Harvest’s Letter, ‘‘Postponement of 

Final Determination and Extension of Provisional 

Measures Period,’’ dated October 18, 2024. 

19See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Petitioner’s Request to 

Postpone Final Antidumping Duty Determination,’’ 

dated October 17, 2024. 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).17

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a 

written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, within 30 days after the date 

of publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain the party’s name, 

address, and telephone number, the 

number of participants, whether any 

participant is a foreign national, and a 

list of the issues to be discussed. If a 

request for a hearing is made, Commerce 

intends to hold the hearing at a time and 

date to be determined. 

Postponement of Final Determination 

and Extension of Provisional Measures 

Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides 

that a final determination may be 

postponed until not later than 135 days 

after the date of the publication of the 

preliminary determination if, in the 

event of an affirmative preliminary 

determination, a request for such 

postponement is made by exporters who 

account for a significant proportion of 

exports of the subject merchandise, or in 

the event of a negative preliminary 

determination, a request for such 

postponement is made by the 

petitioners. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.210(e)(2), Commerce requires that 

requests by respondents for 

postponement of a final antidumping 

duty determination be accompanied by 

a request for extension of provisional 

measures from a four-month period to a 

period not more than six months in 

duration. 

On October 18, 2024, Thai Harvest 

requested that Commerce postpone the 

final determination and that provisional 

measures be extended to a period not to 

exceed six months.18 On October 17, 

Corteva Agriscience LLC (the petitioner) 

also requested that Commerce postpone 

the final determination.19 In accordance 

with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii), because: (1) the 

preliminary determination is 

affirmative; (2) the requesting exporter 

accounts for a significant proportion of 

exports of the subject merchandise; and 

(3) no compelling reasons for denial 

exist, Commerce is postponing the final 

determination and extending the 

provisional measures from a four-month 

period to a period not greater than six 

months. Accordingly, Commerce will 

make its final determination no later 

than 135 days after the date of 

publication of this preliminary 

determination. 

U.S. International Trade Commission 

Notification 

In accordance with section 733(f) of 

the Act, Commerce will notify the U.S. 

International Trade Commission (ITC) of 

its preliminary determination of sales at 

LTFV. If the final determination is 

affirmative, the ITC will determine 

before the later of 120 days after the date 

of this preliminary determination or 45 

days after the final determination 

whether imports of subject merchandise 

are materially injuring, or threaten 

material injury to, the U.S. industry. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This preliminary determination is 

issued and published in accordance 

with sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.205(c). 

Dated: November 6, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

Scope of the Investigation 

The merchandise covered by this 

investigation is 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic 

acid (2,4-D) and its derivative products, 

including salt and ester forms of 2,4-D. 2,4- 

D has the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) 

registry number of 94–75–7 and the chemical 

formula C8H6 Cl2O3. 

Salt and ester forms of 2,4-D include 2,4- 

D sodium salt (CAS 2702–72–9), 2,4-D 

diethanolamine salt (CAS 5742–19–8), 2,4-D 

dimethyl amine salt (CAS 2008–39–1), 2,4-D 

isopropylamine salt (CAS 5742–17–6), 2,4-D 

tri-isopropanolamine salt (CAS 3234180–3), 

2,4-D choline salt (CAS 1048373–72–3), 2,4- 

D butoxyethyl ester (CAS 1929–733), 2,4-D 2- 

ethylhexylester (CAS 1928–43–4), and 2,4-D 

isopropylester (CAS 94–11–1). All 2,4-D, as 

well as the salt and ester forms of 2,4-D, is 

covered by the scope irrespective of purity, 

particle size, or physical form. 

The conversion of a 2,4-D salt or ester from 

2,4-D acid, or the formulation of nonsubject 

merchandise with the subject 2,4-D, its salts, 

and its esters in the country of manufacture 

or in a third country does not remove the 

subject 2,4-D, its salts, or its esters from the 

scope. For any such formulations, only the 

2,4-D, 2,4-D salt, and 2,4-D ester components 

of the mixture is covered by the scope of the 

investigations. Formulations of 2,4-D are 

products that are registered for end-use 

applications with the Environmental 

Protection Agency and contain a dispersion 

agent. 

The country of origin of any 2,4-D 

derivative salt or ester is determined by the 

country in which the underlying 2,4-D acid 

is produced. 2,4-D, its salts, and its esters are 

classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 

2918.99.2010. Subject merchandise, 

including the abovementioned formulations, 

may also be classified under HTSUS 

2922.12.0001, 2921.11.0000, 2921.19.6195, 

2922.19.9690, 3808.93.0500, and 

3808.93.1500. The HTSUS subheadings and 

CAS registry numbers are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes. The 

written description of the scope of the 

investigation is dispositive. 

Appendix II 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Period of Investigation 

IV. Application of Facts Available and Use of 

Adverse Inferences 

V. Single Entity Analysis 

VI. Discussion of the Methodology 

A. Non-Market Economy Country 

B. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value 

Comments 

C. Separate Rates 

D. Combination Rates 

E. The China-Wide Entity 

F. Date of Sale 

G. Comparisons to Fair Value 

H. Export Price 

I. Value-Added Tax 

J. Normal Value 

K. Factor Valuation Methodology 

VII. Adjustment Under Section 777(A)(F) of 

the Act 

VIII. Adjustment to Cash Deposit Rates for 

Export Subsidies in the Companion 

Countervailing Duty Investigation 

IX. Recommendation. 

[FR Doc. 2024–26458 Filed 11–13–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–839] 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From 

the Republic of Tu ̈rkiye: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

common alloy aluminum sheet (CAAS) 

from the Republic of Tu ̈rkiye (Tu ̈rkiye) 

was sold in the United States at less 

than normal value during the period of 

review (POR) April 1, 2022, through 

March 31, 2023. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable November 14, 2024. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
89966 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2024 / Notices 

1See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Tu ̈rkiye: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 36759 

(May 3, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated August 29, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Republic of Tu ̈rkiye; 2022–2023,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

5 Id.; see also Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet 

from Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, 

India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, 

Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan and the 

Republic of Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 

FR 22139 (April 27, 2021) (Order). 

6See the Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

descriptions of these changes. 

7See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3148. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 3, 2024, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results in the Federal 

Register and invited comments from 

interested parties.1 On July 22, 2024, 

Commerce tolled certain deadlines in 

this administrative proceeding by seven 

days.2 On August 29, 2024, Commerce 

extended the deadline for the final 

results of this review to November 6, 

2024.3 The review covers the mandatory 

respondents Assan Alu ̈minyum Sanayi 

ve Ticaret A.S., Kibar Americas, Inc., 

and Kibar Dis Ticaret A.S. (collectively, 

Assan) and Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi 

A.S. (Teknik). A summary of the events 

that occurred since publication of the 

Preliminary Results, as well as a full 

discussion of the issues raised by parties 

for these final results, are discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 5

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is CAAS from Tu ̈rkiye. For a complete 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in parties’ case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum and 

are listed in the appendix to this notice. 

The Issues and Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade/gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received from interested 

parties, Commerce made certain 

changes to the margin calculations for 

Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret 

A.S. (Assan) and Teknik Aluminyum 

Sanayi A.S. (Teknik).6

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a weighted-average 

dumping margin to be determined for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when determining the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis, or 

determined entirely on the basis of facts 

available. For these final results of 

review, we calculated weighted-average 

dumping margins for Assan and Teknik 

that are not zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available. Therefore, 

consistent with Commerce’s practice, 

we determined a dumping margin for 

the non-examined companies by weightaveraging the margins for Assan and 

Teknik using publicly ranged sales 

values for sales of subject merchandise 

to the United States. The non-examined 

companies subject to this review are 

ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret 

A.S., Panda Aluminyum A.S., PMS 

Metal Profil Aluminyum Sanayi ve 

Ticaret A.S., and TAC Metal Ticaret 

Anonim Sirketi. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We determine the following estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the period April 1, 2022, through March 

31, 2023: 

Exporter or producer 

Weightaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Assan Alu ̈minyum Sanayi ve 

Ticaret A.S ........................ 2.38 

Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi 

A.S .................................... 2.72 

Non-Selected Companies ..... 2.55 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results of review to interested parties 

within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. Commerce 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

this administrative review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

because Assan’s and Teknik’s weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), 

we calculated importer-specific ad 

valorem assessment rates based on the 

ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales. Where 

an importer-specific assessment rate is 

zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.7

Consistent with Commerce’s 

clarification of its assessment practice, 

for entries of subject merchandise 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2024 / Notices 89967 

8See Order, 86 FR at 22142. 

9For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

10See Order, 86 FR at 22142. 

during the POR produced by any of the 

above-referenced respondents for which 

they did not know the merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the all-others rate established in the 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation 

of 4.85 percent ad valorem 8 if there is 

no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.9

For the non-examined companies 

subject to review, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate all applicable entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR at 

the rate listed in the table above. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided for 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

company-specific cash deposit rate for 

Assan and Teknik will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review for each respondent (except, if 

that rate is de minimis, then the cash 

deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently-completed segment of this 

proceeding in which they were 

reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review or a prior 

segment of the proceeding but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 4.85 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.10 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties, and/or an increase in the amount 

of antidumping duties by the amount of 

the countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2) and 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: November 6, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Calculation of Assan’s Duty 

Drawback Adjustment 

Comment 2: Exclusion of Assan from the 

AD Order on CAAS from Tu ̈rkiye 

Comment 3: Ministerial Errors in Teknik’s 

Calculations 

Comment 4: Partial Adverse Facts 

Available (AFA) for Certain Freight 

Charges Reported by Assan 

Comment 5: Ministerial Error Regarding 

Assan’s Home Market Variables Incurred 

in Multiple Currencies 

Comment 6: Costs Associated with 

Teknik’s Returned Merchandise 

Comment 7: Teknik’s Freight Revenues 

Comment 8: Revise Teknik’s COP 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–26511 Filed 11–13–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XE438] 

Fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico; 

Southeast Data, Assessment, and 

Review (SEDAR); Public Meeting 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of SEDAR 87 assessment 

webinar IV for Gulf of Mexico white, 

pink, and brown shrimp. 

SUMMARY: The SEDAR 87 assessment 

process of Gulf of Mexico white, pink, 

and brown shrimp will consist of a Data 

Workshop, and a series of assessment 

webinars, and a Review Workshop. See 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. 

DATES: The SEDAR 87 assessment 

webinar IV will be held December 2, 

2024, from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m., Eastern 

Time. 

ADDRESSES: 

Meeting address: The meeting will be 

held via webinar. The webinar is open 

to members of the public. Those 

interested in participating should 

contact Julie A. Neer at SEDAR (see FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) to 

request an invitation providing webinar 

access information. Please request 

webinar invitations at least 24 hours in 

advance of each webinar. 

SEDAR address: 4055 Faber Place 

Drive, Suite 201, North Charleston, SC 

29405. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie 

A. Neer, SEDAR Coordinator; (843) 571– 

4366; email: Julie.neer@safmc.net. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf 

of Mexico, South Atlantic, and 

Caribbean Fishery Management 

Councils, in conjunction with NOAA 

Fisheries and the Atlantic and Gulf 

States Marine Fisheries Commissions 

have implemented the Southeast Data, 

Assessment and Review (SEDAR) 

process, a multi-step method for 

determining the status of fish stocks in 

the Southeast Region. SEDAR is a multistep process including: (1) Data 

Workshop, (2) a series of assessment 

webinars, and (3) A Review Workshop. 

The product of the Data Workshop is a 

report that compiles and evaluates 

potential datasets and recommends 

which datasets are appropriate for 

assessment analyses. The assessment 

webinars produce a report that describes 

the fisheries, evaluates the status of the 

stock, estimates biological benchmarks, 

projects future population conditions, 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1