alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

# RECEIVED OCT 1 4 2014 HEARING DOCKET

In the Matter ofMountain Air Cargo, Inc., Docket No. FAA-2014-0111, Case No. 2013EA680043

AGENCY'S REQUEST FORANOTHER ONE-WEEKEXTENSTION TO FILE REPLYTO RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTALMEMORAMDUM IN RESPONSE TO MOTIONFORDECISION The Agency, by counsel, hereby requests another one-week extension, to October 14, 2014, to file a reply to Respondent's Supplemental Memorandum in response to the Agency's Motion for Decision. The basis for this motion is as follows: (1) Under the Order Granting FAA Motion for Extension ofTime To File a Reply, dated September 30, 2014, the Agency was granted an extension until October 7, 2014 to file the subjectsubmission. (2) The previous Motion for Extension ofTime to File a Reply was based on the Agency's representation that the parties were engaged in settled discussions and had made significant progress in that respect, but some

more time was needed. Since that time, the parties have actually come to a settlement agreement in principle, but just have to come to an agreement over the exact details of the language of the settlement agreement. It is anticipated that the parties will have a fully executedCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify thatthe foregoing AGENCY'S REQUEST FORANOTHER ONE-WEEKEXTENSTION TO FILE REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTALMEMORAMDUMINRESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DECISION has been sent via first classmail and facsimile addressed as follows: MarkA. Dombroff Respondent's Counsel McKenna Long & Alderidge 1676 International Drive PH Mclean, VA 22102 FAX: 703-336-8750 Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 FAX: 202-366-7536 I hereby certify thatthe foregoing AGENCY'S REQUEST FORANOTHER ONE-WEEKEXTENSTIONTO FILE REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORAMDUMIN RESPONSE TO MOTIONFOR DECISION has been sent via first class mail addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Date:October 6, 2014 h<••

# it!.~ Attorney FederalAviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 3
REGULATORY EVA UATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-I02-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD beconsidered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have asignificant economic impact on asubstantial number of small entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation inAlaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is

## if appropriate to Include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
J.

that he would appeal appellant's sentence. Appellant did not provide any facts indicating that he believed an appeal had been filed or that he filed his petition within a reasonable time of learning that counsel had not filed an appeal. See id. at 254-55, 71 P.3d at 507-08. Thus, we conclude that the district court did not err in rejecting this good cause argument.

Appellant also claimed that the law library was not equipped to assist someone who lacked legal knowledge, that he was mentally ill and had been taken advantage of by other inmates, and that he had been placed in protected segregation. Appellant's lack of legal knowledge does not constitute good cause. Phelps v. Dir., Nev. Dep't of Prisons, 104 Nev. 656, 660, 764 P.2d 1303, 1306 (1988). As to his assertions that he was mentally ill and placed in segregation, he failed to specify any facts as to how this impeded him from filing a timely post-conviction petition. See Hathaway, 119 Nev. at 254-55, 71 P.3d at 507-08. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying his petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

Saitta

2 We deny appellant's motion for a stay and abeyance. We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2

### cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Raffick Sahibjohn Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 

### 3
#### John R. Adam *v.*David Hay.

From Cumberland.

In an action against a Common Carrier on the Cape-Fear River, there was a verdict for the Plaintiff, and Defendant moved for a new trial, supporting his motion by an affidavit that he expected to prove by the witnesses whom he examined on the trial, a custom among the owners and freighters of Boats on the River, winch would have excused him from the liability of a common carrier: That he was disappointed in their evidence and thereby surprised : That since the verdict he had discovered witnesses who he believed would prove the custom, and that he did not know of their testimony until after the verdict. Motion for a new trial disallowed.

The Defendant was sued as a common carrier on the River Cape-Fear, between Fayetteville and Wilmington.

There was a verdict for the Plaintiff, and a rule for a new trial was obtained upon the following affidavit, to-wit,

“ The Defendant swears that he had been induced to believe that the “ witnesses whom he summoned to prove the custom of the owners and *“*freighters of boats upon the River, would have sufficiently proved the « custom, so as to excuse him as a carrier: and that he was surprised at « the trial, to learn that they would not. That since the trial he has dis- *“*covered witnesses who he believes will prove the custom, and that he * did not know of their testimony until since the trial.”

The rule for a new trial was discharged, and the De» fendant appealed to this Court: And

Daniel, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We do not see any facts disclosed in the affidavit to induce us to grant a new trial. We know of no custom which could excuse the Defendant from the operation of the law governing common carriers. If such a custom do exist, and it would aid the Defendant, it is strange he should have been unable to prove it on the trial, as the Court was liolden in the town where the greatest part of the commercial transactions on the Cape-Fear are carried on. Let the rule be discharged.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Property Analysts Master
Limited Partnership ("NPAMLP") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert McKinney, President of Feldman International, Inc.,
the Equity General Partner of NPAMLP certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NPAMLP.

              NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                  (Registrant)

                                     Date: July 14, 2006
                                          --------------

                                     By:  Feldman International Inc., its equity
                                          general partner
                                          --------------------------------------

                                      By: /s/ Robert McKinney
                                          -------------------
                                          Name:  Robert McKinney
                                          Title: President
COURT OF APPEALS FOIl TtlE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER 

### Appellate case name: Steven Allender v. Judith Cooper, Katy Chamber of Commerce d/b/a Katy Area Chamber of Commerce, and Katy Chamber of Commerce d/b/a Katy Rice Harvest Festival Appellate case number: 01-12-00430-CV 

### Trial court case number: 0859572 Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County Appellees Katy Chamber of Commerce d/b/a Katy Area Chamber of Commerce and Katy Chamber of Commerce d/b/a Katy Rice Harvest Festival have filed a motion to dismiss the above-referenced appeal. The motion is DENIED. 

### Judge’s signature: /s/Sherry Radack

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court Date: December 6, 2012
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Diversified Futures Trust I for the period July 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                   
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr
|Name:              |  | David K. Spohr                                                                                                                                                                    
|Title:             |  | Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.,Managing Owner ofDiversified
Futures Trust I
|                   | 
|Date:              |  | November 12, 2008
jQuery('#edit-request-representative-from-regional').parent().hide();
jQuery('#edit-request-representative-from-area').parent().hide();
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 21, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-17-00914-CV

NDEM BURABARI ODUU, Appellant 

V.

BARIVURE ELIZABETH DAN-DUKOR, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 311th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-00572 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

After we sustained the court reporter’s contest to appellant’s statement of 

inability to afford payment of costs, we ordered appellant to provide, by May 2, 

2018, proof he had paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and the 

reporter’s record. We extended the deadline 60 days on appellant’s motions, but no 

proof of payment arrangements was filed.

On July 19, 2018, we again ordered appellant to provide proof of payment or 

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and reporter’s record. Such proof was due 
2

by July 30, 2018. We stated no further extensions would be granted absent 

extraordinary circumstances. We cautioned that if appellant failed to make such a 

showing with respect to the clerk’s record, this appeal may be dismissed. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2), 37.3(b). Neither the clerk’s record nor proof of payment or 

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record has been filed.

Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Donovan, and Wise
# ]f Dowlohnes

Dow Lohnes PLLC Mru.dôwlohnes.com Jonathan B. Hill D 2o2.776.2725 E jhill@dowlohres.com September 30, 2011 

### VIA 

## EMAIL Esta Rosenburg 

### Chief U.S.

### Air Calrier Licensing 

### Division Department of

### Transponation 1200 

### New Jersey 

### Avenue, SE 

### x-44 Washington, 

### DC 20590



# Re: DOT-OST-20l1-0186 Dea¡ 

### Ms. Rosenbwg: Hawaiian 

### Airlines, Inc. 

### ("Hawaiian") has completed its 

### polling of carriers served 

### with Hawaiian's 

### Application for a Statement 

### of Authorization 

### filed in the above-referenced docket. The Statement 

### of Authorization 

### will allow Hawaiian to commence codeshare serwice

### with 

### Virgin Australìa Intemational 

### Airlines Pty 

### Ltd 

### (*V Australia") asdescribed in the

### application.

### All 

## of the

### air carriers 

### polled expressed 

### "no objection," so Hawaiian 

### respectfully requests that the Department grantthe Statement 

### ofAuthorization as soon as practicaJ. Thank you 

### for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely

# yours, /fp F



# A**r^* ß.JW Jãnathan B. 

### Hitl Counsel

### for Hawaiian

### Airlines, Inc. 

# cc: Service 

### list for DOT-OST-2O11-0186 

### Anita Mosner, Esq.

i2oo New Hampshir€ Avenue, NU Su¡te 8oo Washinglon, DC 2o036-68o2 f 2o2-776.2000 Í 2o2-776.22a2 WASH|NGToN, DC ATLANm, GA
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Henry W. Nozko, Jr., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
      ACMAT Corporation; and

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report.


Date:    October 19, 2004
                                                        /s/ Henry W. Nozko, Jr.
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                       5
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000002880
<NAME>                        AIC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                             842,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,297,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (138,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,655,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,807,000
<PP&E>                                           1,301,000              
<DEPRECIATION>                                     305,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,821,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,523,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           424,488
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,082,000      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,821,000
<SALES>                                         13,478,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,478,000
<CGS>                                            9,044,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,044,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 211,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    527,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                       411,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                116,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       116,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .03
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90078-90079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26384]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby

[[Page 90079]]

gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
428 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-253, K2025-251.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26384 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<TABLE>
Main Place Real Estate Investment Trust
Exhibit 12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in Thousands)
<CAPTION>
                                        Six Months      Year           Year           Year       From Inception
                                         Ended          Ended          Ended          Ended         Through
                                         June 30,    December 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
                                          1998          1997           1996           1995           1994
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>            <C> 
Income before taxes................  $  1,144,788    $  1,293,866    $  216,709      $   48,070     $   5,459

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense................       641,954         595,818       255,318         145,822        25,701
   Amortization of debt discount and
    appropriate issuance costs.....         2,046           3,713         2,856             983             -
                                     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Total fixed charges...........       644,000         599,531       258,174         146,805        25,701

Earnings before fixed charges......  $  1,788,788    $  1,893,397    $  474,883      $  194,875     $  31,160

                                     ===========================================================================

Fixed charges......................  $    644,000    $    599,531    $  258,174      $  146,805     $  25,701

                                     ===========================================================================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.          2.78            3.16          1.84            1.33          1.21

</TABLE>
1

Date: August 20, 2010

Subject: Minutes of the August 17, 2010 Conference Call with Nevada Division of 

Environmental Protection

EPA Contract No. EP-D-06-118; EPA Work Assignment No. 4-06

RTI Project No. 0210426.004.006

From: Chuck French

OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243-02)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

To: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0239

I. Introduction

A conference call with Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) was held on 

August 17, 2010. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss NDEP’s major comments to the 

proposed rule. This memorandum summarizes the major topics discussed during the meeting.

II. Attendees

Mike Elges, NDEP

Rob Bamford, NDEP

Chuck French, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Marvin Branscome, RTI International

Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

III. Discussion

The major topics discussed during the meeting included title V permitting, compliance date 

for new sources, new source limit and percent reduction alternative for carbon processes affected 

source, annual compliance schedule, Method 29 for annual mercury testing, other mercury test 

methods, consistency of units in equations, one-hour periods, calendar year basis, measuring ore 

as fed to autoclave, mercury concentration monitoring for roasters, mercury concentration 

monitoring for carbon adsorbers, definition of retort, and outlier test data.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10860]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    BILLS PRESENTED TO THE PRESIDENT

  Lorraine C. Miller, Clerk of the House reports that on November 20, 
2008 she presented to the President of the United States, for his 
approval, the following bills.

       H.R. 5714. To require the Secretary of the Treasury to mint 
     coins in recognition and celebration of the establishment of 
     the United States Army in 1775, to honor the American Soldier 
     of both today and yesterday, in wartime and in peace, and to 
     commemorate the traditions, history, and heritage of the 
     United States Army and its role in American Society, from the 
     Colonial period to today.
       H.R. 6867. To provide for additional emergency unemployment 
     compensation.

  Lorraine C. Miller, Clerk of the House reports that on November 25, 
2008 she presented to the President of the United States, for his 
approval, the following bill.

       H.R. 2050. To require the Secretary of the Treasury to mint 
     coins in commemoration of the semicentennial of the enactment 
     of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

                          ____________________
```