# Official Journal L 160/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.160.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 160 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5326 June 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.160.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 160

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5326 June 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 560/2010 of 25 June 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farine de blé noir de Bretagne/Farine de blé noir de Bretagne — Gwinizh du Breizh (PGI)) | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 561/2010 of 25 June 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2010/350/EU |
| | * | European Council Decision of 17 June 2010 on the examination by a conference of representatives of the governments of the Member States of the amendments to the Treaties proposed by the Spanish Government concerning the composition of the European Parliament and not to convene a Convention | 5 |
| | | 2010/351/CFSP |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision EUJUST LEX-IRAQ/1/2010 of 22 June 2010 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ | 10 |
| | | 2010/352/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 22 June 2010 on a Union financial contribution towards Member States’ fisheries control, inspection and surveillance programmes for 2010
  (notified under document C(2010) 3940) | 11 |
| | | 2010/353/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 24 June 2010 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances amisulbrom, chlorantraniliprole, meptyldinocap and pinoxaden
  (notified under document C(2010) 4177)

   (
  1
  ) | 26 |
| | | 2010/354/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 25 June 2010 amending Decision 2008/855/EC as regards animal health control measures relating to classical swine fever in feral pigs
  (notified under document C(2010) 4170)

   (
  1
  ) | 28 |
| | | 2010/355/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 25 June 2010 concerning the non-inclusion of trifluralin in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC
  (notified under document C(2010) 4199)

   (
  1
  ) | 30 |
| | | 2010/356/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 25 June 2010 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substance profoxydim
  (notified under document C(2010) 4225)

   (
  1
  ) | 32 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 560/2010 of 25 June 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farine de blé noir de Bretagne/Farine de blé noir de Bretagne — Gwinizh du Breizh (PGI))

1

Commission Regulation (EU) No 561/2010 of 25 June 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

3

DECISIONS

2010/350/EU

*

European Council Decision of 17 June 2010 on the examination by a conference of representatives of the governments of the Member States of the amendments to the Treaties proposed by the Spanish Government concerning the composition of the European Parliament and not to convene a Convention

5

2010/351/CFSP

*

Political and Security Committee Decision EUJUST LEX-IRAQ/1/2010 of 22 June 2010 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ

10

2010/352/EU

*

Commission Decision of 22 June 2010 on a Union financial contribution towards Member States’ fisheries control, inspection and surveillance programmes for 2010
  (notified under document C(2010) 3940)

(notified under document C(2010) 3940)

11

2010/353/EU

*

Commission Decision of 24 June 2010 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances amisulbrom, chlorantraniliprole, meptyldinocap and pinoxaden
  (notified under document C(2010) 4177)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2010) 4177)

1

26

2010/354/EU

*

Commission Decision of 25 June 2010 amending Decision 2008/855/EC as regards animal health control measures relating to classical swine fever in feral pigs
  (notified under document C(2010) 4170)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2010) 4170)

1

28

2010/355/EU

*

Commission Decision of 25 June 2010 concerning the non-inclusion of trifluralin in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC
  (notified under document C(2010) 4199)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2010) 4199)

1

30

2010/356/EU

*

Commission Decision of 25 June 2010 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substance profoxydim
  (notified under document C(2010) 4225)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2010) 4225)

1

32

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

| 26.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 560/2010

of 25 June 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farine de blé noir de Bretagne/Farine de blé noir de Bretagne — Gwinizh du Breizh (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Farine de blé noir de Bretagne’ or ‘Farine de blé noir de Bretagne — Gwinizh du Breizh’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Farine de blé noir de Bretagne’ or ‘Farine de blé noir de Bretagne — Gwinizh du Breizh’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 June 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 157, 10.7.2009, p. 14.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

FRANCE

Farine de blé noir de Bretagne/Farine de blé noir de Bretagne — Gwinizh du Breizh (PGI)

---

| 26.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 561/2010

of 25 June 2010

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 June 2010.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 June 2010.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 44,4 |
| MK | 39,0 |
| TR | 53,0 |
| ZZ | 45,5 |
| 0707 00 05 | MK | 41,0 |
| TR | 117,2 |
| ZZ | 79,1 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 101,0 |
| ZZ | 101,0 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 86,2 |
| TR | 73,7 |
| US | 84,1 |
| ZA | 87,6 |
| ZZ | 82,9 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 115,3 |
| BR | 92,3 |
| CA | 95,4 |
| CL | 103,9 |
| CN | 59,1 |
| NZ | 118,7 |
| US | 112,0 |
| UY | 160,6 |
| ZA | 89,7 |
| ZZ | 105,2 |
| 0809 10 00 | TR | 229,7 |
| ZZ | 229,7 |
| 0809 20 95 | SY | 178,6 |
| TR | 298,9 |
| US | 700,6 |
| ZZ | 392,7 |
| 0809 30 | AR | 133,5 |
| TR | 149,8 |
| ZZ | 141,7 |
| 0809 40 05 | AU | 258,9 |
| EG | 218,2 |
| IL | 210,4 |
| US | 319,2 |
| ZZ | 251,7 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

44,4

MK

39,0

TR

53,0

ZZ

45,5

0707 00 05

MK

41,0

TR

117,2

ZZ

79,1

0709 90 70

TR

101,0

ZZ

101,0

0805 50 10

AR

86,2

TR

73,7

US

84,1

ZA

87,6

ZZ

82,9

0808 10 80

AR

115,3

BR

92,3

CA

95,4

CL

103,9

CN

59,1

NZ

118,7

US

112,0

UY

160,6

ZA

89,7

ZZ

105,2

0809 10 00

TR

229,7

ZZ

229,7

0809 20 95

SY

178,6

TR

298,9

US

700,6

ZZ

392,7

0809 30

AR

133,5

TR

149,8

ZZ

141,7

0809 40 05

AU

258,9

EG

218,2

IL

210,4

US

319,2

ZZ

251,7

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---

DECISIONS

| 26.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/5

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION

of 17 June 2010

on the examination by a conference of representatives of the governments of the Member States of the amendments to the Treaties proposed by the Spanish Government concerning the composition of the European Parliament and not to convene a Convention

(2010/350/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 48(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal for amendments to the Treaties submitted to the Council by the Spanish Government on 4 December 2009 and submitted to the European Council by the Council on 7 December 2009,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament not to convene a Convention (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

After notification of the proposal to the national parliaments,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | On 4 December 2009, following the conclusions of the European Council at its meetings on 11 and 12 December 2008 and on 18 and 19 June 2009, the Spanish Government submitted, in accordance with Article 48(2), first sentence, of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), a proposal for the amendment of the Treaties concerning the composition of the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 4 December 2009, following the conclusions of the European Council at its meetings on 11 and 12 December 2008 and on 18 and 19 June 2009, the Spanish Government submitted, in accordance with Article 48(2), first sentence, of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), a proposal for the amendment of the Treaties concerning the composition of the European Parliament.

| (2) | On 7 December 2009, in accordance with Article 48(2), third sentence, of the TEU, the said proposal was submitted by the Council to the European Council. It was also notified to the national Parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 7 December 2009, in accordance with Article 48(2), third sentence, of the TEU, the said proposal was submitted by the Council to the European Council. It was also notified to the national Parliaments.

| (3) | At its meeting on 10 and 11 December 2009, the European Council decided, in accordance with Article 48(3), first subparagraph, of the TEU, to consult the European Parliament and the Commission on the proposed amendments. It also decided, in accordance with Article 48(3), second subparagraph, of the TEU, to request the consent of the European Parliament on its intention not to convene a Convention given that, in its view, this was not justified by the extent of the proposed amendments. Letters to those ends were sent by the President of the European Council on 18 December 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

At its meeting on 10 and 11 December 2009, the European Council decided, in accordance with Article 48(3), first subparagraph, of the TEU, to consult the European Parliament and the Commission on the proposed amendments. It also decided, in accordance with Article 48(3), second subparagraph, of the TEU, to request the consent of the European Parliament on its intention not to convene a Convention given that, in its view, this was not justified by the extent of the proposed amendments. Letters to those ends were sent by the President of the European Council on 18 December 2009.

| (4) | On 6 May 2010, the European Parliament adopted a favourable opinion on the proposed amendments. It also gave its consent on the decision not to convene a Convention as this is not justified by the extent of the proposed amendments. On 28 April 2010, the Commission adopted a favourable opinion on the proposed amendments. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On 6 May 2010, the European Parliament adopted a favourable opinion on the proposed amendments. It also gave its consent on the decision not to convene a Convention as this is not justified by the extent of the proposed amendments. On 28 April 2010, the Commission adopted a favourable opinion on the proposed amendments.

| (5) | Therefore, it is appropriate that, in accordance with Article 48(3) of the TEU, the European Council decide that a conference of representatives of the governments of the Member States should examine the amendments proposed by the Spanish Government, define the terms of reference of the conference and decide not to convene a Convention, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Therefore, it is appropriate that, in accordance with Article 48(3) of the TEU, the European Council decide that a conference of representatives of the governments of the Member States should examine the amendments proposed by the Spanish Government, define the terms of reference of the conference and decide not to convene a Convention,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The European Council hereby decides that a conference of representatives of the governments of the Member States shall examine the amendments to Article 2 of the Protocol on transitional provisions annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, regarding the composition of the European Parliament, as proposed by the Spanish Government on 4 December 2009, in the wording as annexed to this Decision, which will constitute the terms of reference of the said conference. In view of the extent of the proposed amendments, a Convention under Article 48(3) of the Treaty on European Union shall not be convened.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2010.

For the European Council

The President

H. VAN ROMPUY

---

(1)  Consent of 6 May 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  Opinion of 6 May 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

2

(3)  Opinion of 28 April 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

3

---

ANNEX

DRAFT

PROTOCOL

amending the Protocol on transitional provisions annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM,

THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA,

THE CZECH REPUBLIC,

THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK,

THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY,

THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA,

IRELAND,

THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC,

THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN,

THE FRENCH REPUBLIC,

THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC,

THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS,

THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA,

THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA,

THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG,

THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY,

MALTA,

THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS,

THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA,

THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND,

THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC,

ROMANIA,

THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA,

THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC,

THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND,

THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN,

THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND,

HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS ‘THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES’,

WHEREAS, as the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force after the European Parliament elections on 4 to 7 June 2009, and as provided for in the declaration adopted by the European Council at its meeting on 11 and 12 December 2008 and in the political agreement reached by the European Council at its meeting on 18 and 19 June 2009, it is necessary to lay down transitional provisions on the composition of the European Parliament until the end of the 2009-2014 parliamentary term,

WHEREAS such transitional provisions are to allow those Member States whose number of members of the European Parliament would have been higher if the Treaty of Lisbon had been in force at the time of the European Parliament elections in June 2009 to be given the appropriate number of additional seats and to fill them,

CONSIDERING the number of seats per Member State provided for in the draft Decision of the European Council approved politically by the European Parliament on 11 October 2007 and by the European Council (Declaration No 5 annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon) and considering Declaration No 4 annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon,

WHEREAS it is necessary to create, for the period remaining between the entry into force of this Protocol and the end of the 2009-2014 parliamentary term, the 18 additional seats provided for the Member States concerned by the political agreement reached by the European Council at its meeting on 18 and 19 June 2009,

WHEREAS, in order to do this, it is necessary to allow, provisionally, the number of members to exceed, respectively, the number of members per Member State and the maximum number of members provided for both in the Treaties in force at the time of the European Parliament elections in June 2009 and in the first subparagraph of Article 14(2) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon,

WHEREAS it is also necessary to lay down the detailed arrangements for the Member States concerned to fill the additional seats provisionally created,

WHEREAS, as regards transitional provisions, it is necessary to amend the Protocol on transitional provisions annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

HAVE AGREED UPON THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS:

Article 1

Article 2 of the Protocol on transitional provisions annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 2

1.   For the period of the 2009-2014 parliamentary term remaining at the date of entry into force of this Article, and by way of derogation from Articles 189, second paragraph, and 190(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Articles 107, second paragraph, and 108(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, which were in force at the time of the European Parliament elections in June 2009, and by way of derogation from the number of seats provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 14(2) of the Treaty on European Union, the following 18 seats shall be added to the existing 736 seats, thus provisionally bringing the total number of members of the European Parliament to 754 until the end of the 2009-2014 parliamentary term:

| Bulgaria | 1 |
| --- | --- |
| Spain | 4 |
| France | 2 |
| Italy | 1 |
| Latvia | 1 |
| Malta | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 |
| Austria | 2 |
| Poland | 1 |
| Slovenia | 1 |
| Sweden | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |

Bulgaria

1

Spain

4

France

2

Italy

1

Latvia

1

Malta

1

Netherlands

1

Austria

2

Poland

1

Slovenia

1

Sweden

2

United Kingdom

1

2.   By way of derogation from Article 14(3) of the Treaty on European Union, the Member States concerned shall designate the persons who will fill the additional seats referred to in paragraph 1, in accordance with the legislation of the Member States concerned and provided that the persons in question have been elected by direct universal suffrage:

| (a) | in ad hoc elections by direct universal suffrage in the Member State concerned, in accordance with the provisions applicable for elections to the European Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

in ad hoc elections by direct universal suffrage in the Member State concerned, in accordance with the provisions applicable for elections to the European Parliament;

| (b) | by reference to the results of the European Parliament elections from 4 to 7 June 2009;
  or |
| --- | --- |

(b)

by reference to the results of the European Parliament elections from 4 to 7 June 2009;

or

| (c) | by designation, by the national parliament of the Member State concerned from among its members, of the requisite number of members, according to the procedure determined by each of those Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

by designation, by the national parliament of the Member State concerned from among its members, of the requisite number of members, according to the procedure determined by each of those Member States.

3.   In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 14(2) of the Treaty on European Union, the European Council shall adopt a decision determining the composition of the European Parliament in good time before the 2014 European Parliament elections.’.

Article 2

This Protocol shall be ratified by the High Contracting Parties, in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the Government of the Italian Republic.

This Protocol shall enter into force if possible on 1 December 2010, provided that all the instruments of ratification have been deposited, or, failing that, on the first day of the month following the deposit of the instrument of ratification by the last signatory State to take this step.

Article 3

This Protocol, drawn up in a single original in the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, each text being equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the Italian Republic, which shall transmit a certified copy to each of the governments of the other signatory States.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Protocol.

Done at ... this day of ... in the year ... .

---

| 26.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/10

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUJUST LEX-IRAQ/1/2010

of 22 June 2010

extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ

(2010/351/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/330/CFSP of 14 June 2010 on the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ (1) and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 9(2) of Council Decision 2010/330/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of political control and strategic direction of the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ (hereinafter referred to as ‘EUJUST LEX-IRAQ’), including in particular the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 9(2) of Council Decision 2010/330/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of political control and strategic direction of the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ (hereinafter referred to as ‘EUJUST LEX-IRAQ’), including in particular the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | On 15 December 2009, upon a proposal by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR), the PSC adopted Decision 2009/982/CFSP (2) appointing Mr Francisco DÍAZ ALCANTUD as Head of Mission of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 15 December 2009, upon a proposal by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR), the PSC adopted Decision 2009/982/CFSP (2) appointing Mr Francisco DÍAZ ALCANTUD as Head of Mission of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ.

| (3) | On 16 June 2010, the HR proposed to the PSC that it extend the mandate of Mr Francisco DÍAZ ALCANTUD as Head of Mission of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ until 30 June 2011. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 16 June 2010, the HR proposed to the PSC that it extend the mandate of Mr Francisco DÍAZ ALCANTUD as Head of Mission of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ until 30 June 2011.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Francisco DÍAZ ALCANTUD as Head of Mission of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ is hereby extended from 1 July 2010 until 30 June 2011.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 22 June 2010.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairman

C. FERNÁNDEZ-ARIAS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 149, 15.6.2010, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 338, 19.12.2009, p. 92.

2

---

| 26.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/11

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 22 June 2010

on a Union financial contribution towards Member States’ fisheries control, inspection and surveillance programmes for 2010

(notified under document C(2010) 3940)

(Only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Lithuanian, Polish, Romanian, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)

(2010/352/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 861/2006 of 22 May 2006 establishing Community financial measures for the implementation of the common fisheries policy and in the area of the Law of the Sea (1), and in particular Article 21 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Member States have submitted to the Commission their fisheries control programme for 2010 together with the applications for a Union financial contribution towards the expenditure to be incurred in carrying out the projects contained in such programme. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Member States have submitted to the Commission their fisheries control programme for 2010 together with the applications for a Union financial contribution towards the expenditure to be incurred in carrying out the projects contained in such programme.

| (2) | Applications concerning actions listed in Article 8(a) of Regulation (EC) No 861/2006 may qualify for Union funding. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Applications concerning actions listed in Article 8(a) of Regulation (EC) No 861/2006 may qualify for Union funding.

| (3) | Applications for Union funding are to comply with the rules set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 391/2007 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Applications for Union funding are to comply with the rules set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 391/2007 (2).

| (4) | It is appropriate to fix the maximum amounts and the rate of the Union financial contribution within the limits set by Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 861/2006 and to lay down the conditions under which such contribution may be granted. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

It is appropriate to fix the maximum amounts and the rate of the Union financial contribution within the limits set by Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 861/2006 and to lay down the conditions under which such contribution may be granted.

| (5) | In order to encourage investment in the priority actions defined by the Commission in conformity with the Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 (3) and in view of the negative impact of the financial crisis on Member States’ budgets, expenditure related to automation and management of data, electronic recording and reporting systems (ERS) and vessel monitoring systems (VMS), as well as to seminars by Member States aiming at enhancing awareness on the new control Regulation as well as on illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, should benefit from a high co-financing rate, within the limits laid down in Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 861/2006. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In order to encourage investment in the priority actions defined by the Commission in conformity with the Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 (3) and in view of the negative impact of the financial crisis on Member States’ budgets, expenditure related to automation and management of data, electronic recording and reporting systems (ERS) and vessel monitoring systems (VMS), as well as to seminars by Member States aiming at enhancing awareness on the new control Regulation as well as on illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, should benefit from a high co-financing rate, within the limits laid down in Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 861/2006.

| (6) | In order to limit the amount dedicated to the purchase and modernisation of fisheries patrol vessels and aircraft, the Union contribution to these expenditure shall be restricted to a maximum amount of EUR 1 Million by Member State. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

In order to limit the amount dedicated to the purchase and modernisation of fisheries patrol vessels and aircraft, the Union contribution to these expenditure shall be restricted to a maximum amount of EUR 1 Million by Member State.

| (7) | In order to qualify for the contribution, automatic localisation devices should satisfy the requirements fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2244/2003 of 18 December 2003 laying down detailed provisions regarding satellite-based Vessel Monitoring Systems (4). |
| --- | --- |

(7)

In order to qualify for the contribution, automatic localisation devices should satisfy the requirements fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2244/2003 of 18 December 2003 laying down detailed provisions regarding satellite-based Vessel Monitoring Systems (4).

| (8) | In order to qualify for the contribution, electronic recording and reporting devices on board fishing vessels should satisfy the requirements laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1077/2008 of 3 November 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1966/2006 on electronic recording and reporting of fishing activities and on means of remote sensing and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1566/2007 (5). |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In order to qualify for the contribution, electronic recording and reporting devices on board fishing vessels should satisfy the requirements laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1077/2008 of 3 November 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1966/2006 on electronic recording and reporting of fishing activities and on means of remote sensing and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1566/2007 (5).

| (9) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture, |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Subject matter

This Decision provides for a Union financial contribution for 2010 towards expenditure incurred by Member States for 2010 in implementing the monitoring and control systems applicable to the common fisheries policy (CFP), as referred to in Article 8(a) of Regulation (EC) No 861/2006. It establishes the maximum amount of the Union financial contribution for each Member State, the rate of the Union financial contribution and the conditions on which such contribution may be granted.

Article 2

Closure of outstanding commitments

All payments in respect of which a reimbursement is claimed shall be made by the Member State concerned by 30 June 2014. Payments made by a Member State after that deadline shall not be eligible for reimbursement. The budgetary appropriations related to this Decision shall be de-committed at the latest by 31 December 2015.

Article 3

New technologies and IT networks

1.   Expenditure incurred, in respect of projects referred to in Annex I, on the setting up of new technologies and IT networks in order to allow efficient and secure collection and management of data in connection with monitoring, control and surveillance of fisheries activities, shall qualify for a financial contribution of 90 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits laid down in that Annex.

2.   Expenditure incurred, in respect of projects referred to in Annex I and related to vessel monitoring system (VMS), electronic recording and reporting system (ERS) or illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing shall qualify for a financial contribution of 90 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits laid down in that Annex.

3.   Any other expenditure incurred for new technologies and IT networks, in respect of projects referred in Annex I, shall qualify for a financial contribution of 50 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits let down in that Annex.

Article 4

Automatic localisation devices

1.   Expenditure incurred, in respect of projects referred to in Annex II, on the purchase and fitting on board of fishing vessels of automatic localisation devices enabling vessels to be monitored at a distance by a fisheries monitoring centre through a vessel monitoring system (VMS) shall qualify for a financial contribution of 90 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits established in that Annex.

2.   The financial contribution referred to in paragraph 1 shall be limited to EUR 2 500 per vessel.

3.   In order to qualify for the financial contribution referred to in paragraph 1, automatic localisation devices shall satisfy the requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 2244/2003.

Article 5

Electronic recording and reporting systems

Expenditure incurred, in respect of projects referred to in Annex III, on the development, purchase, and installation of, as well as technical assistance for, the components necessary for electronic recording and reporting systems (ERS), in order to allow efficient and secure data exchange related to monitoring, control and surveillance of fisheries activities, shall qualify for a financial contribution of 90 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits laid down in that Annex.

Article 6

Electronic recording and reporting devices

1.   Expenditure incurred, in respect of projects referred to in Annex IV, on the purchase and fitting on board of fishing vessels of ERS devices enabling vessels to record and report electronically to a Fisheries Monitoring Centre data on fisheries activities, shall qualify for a financial contribution of 90 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits established in that Annex.

2.   The financial contribution referred to in paragraph 1 shall be limited to EUR 3 000 per vessel, without prejudice to paragraph 4.

3.   In order to qualify for a financial contribution, ERS devices shall satisfy the requirements established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1077/2008.

4.   In case of devices combining ERS and VMS functions, and fulfilling the requirements laid down in Regulations (EC) No 2244/2003 and (EC) No 1077/2008, the financial contribution referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be limited to EUR 4 500.

Article 7

Pilot projects

Expenditure incurred, in respect of projects referred to in Annex V, on pilot projects on new control technologies shall qualify for a financial contribution of 90 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits laid down in that Annex.

Article 8

Training and exchange programmes

Expenditure incurred, in respect of projects referred to in Annex VI, on training and exchange programmes of civil servants responsible for monitoring, control and surveillance tasks in the fisheries area shall qualify for a financial contribution of 50 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits laid down in that Annex.

Article 9

Initiatives raising awareness of CFP rules

1.   Expenditure incurred, in respect of projects referred to in Annex VIII, on initiatives including seminar and media tools aimed at enhancing awareness among fishermen and other players such as inspectors, public prosecutors and judges, as well as among the general public, on the need to fight irresponsible and illegal fishing and to implement the new control Regulation, shall qualify for a financial contribution of 90 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits laid down in that Annex.

2.   Any other expenditure incurred for initiatives raising awareness of CFP rules, in respect of projects referred in Annex VIII, shall qualify for a financial contribution of 50 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits let down in that Annex.

Article 10

Fisheries patrol vessels and aircraft

1.   Expenditure incurred, in respect of projects referred to in Annex IX, on the purchase and modernisation of vessels and aircraft used for inspection and surveillance of fishing activities by the competent authorities of the Member States shall qualify for a financial contribution up to 50 % of the eligible expenditure, within the limits laid down in that Annex.

2.   The financial contribution specified for each Member State in Annex IX shall be calculated on the basis of the utilisation of the concerned vessels and aircraft for inspection and surveillance as a percentage of their total yearly activity, as declared by the Member States.

Article 11

Total maximum Union contribution per Member State

The planned expenditure, the eligible share thereof, and the maximum Union contribution per Member State are as follows:

| (in EUR) |
| --- |
| Member State | Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme | Eligible expenditure | Maximum Union contribution |
| Belgium | 254 270 | 254 270 | 176 343 |
| Bulgaria | 195 828 | 195 828 | 153 748 |
| Denmark | 3 215 749 | 3 148 559 | 2 729 961 |
| Germany | 6 418 061 | 1 120 000 | 893 600 |
| Estonia | 239 745 | 239 745 | 207 873 |
| Ireland | 51 495 000 | 46 395 000 | 1 997 500 |
| Greece | 18 595 000 | 7 085 750 | 5 111 175 |
| Spain | 9 563 245 | 9 153 093 | 7 735 444 |
| France | 4 536 370 | 3 497 768 | 2 640 008 |
| Italy | 26 650 600 | 2 625 600 | 1 312 800 |
| Cyprus | 357 800 | 357 800 | 318 900 |
| Lithuania | 460 001 | 460 001 | 404 001 |
| Netherlands | 2 809 000 | 1 616 000 | 1 424 000 |
| Poland | 702 600 | 696 000 | 600 000 |
| Romania | 593 600 | 593 600 | 334 240 |
| Slovenia | 510 807 | 507 649 | 383 900 |
| Finland | 981 000 | 881 000 | 766 500 |
| Sweden | 2 353 016 | 2 139 327 | 1 902 083 |
| United Kingdom | 2 164 334 | 1 408 528 | 1 036 432 |
| Total | 132 096 027 | 82 375 517 | 30 128 508 |

(in EUR)

Member State

Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme

Eligible expenditure

Maximum Union contribution

Belgium

254 270

254 270

176 343

Bulgaria

195 828

195 828

153 748

Denmark

3 215 749

3 148 559

2 729 961

Germany

6 418 061

1 120 000

893 600

Estonia

239 745

239 745

207 873

Ireland

51 495 000

46 395 000

1 997 500

Greece

18 595 000

7 085 750

5 111 175

Spain

9 563 245

9 153 093

7 735 444

France

4 536 370

3 497 768

2 640 008

Italy

26 650 600

2 625 600

1 312 800

Cyprus

357 800

357 800

318 900

Lithuania

460 001

460 001

404 001

Netherlands

2 809 000

1 616 000

1 424 000

Poland

702 600

696 000

600 000

Romania

593 600

593 600

334 240

Slovenia

510 807

507 649

383 900

Finland

981 000

881 000

766 500

Sweden

2 353 016

2 139 327

1 902 083

United Kingdom

2 164 334

1 408 528

1 036 432

Total

132 096 027

82 375 517

30 128 508

Article 12

Addressees

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Lithuania, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Poland, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 22 June 2010.

For the Commission

Maria DAMANAKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 97, 12.4.2007, p. 30.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 333, 20.12.2003, p. 17.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 295, 4.11.2008, p. 3.

5

---

ANNEX I

NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND IT NETWORKS

| Member State and project code | Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme | Eligible expenditure | Utilisation rate for control purposes | Net eligible | Maximum Union contribution |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (EUR) | (EUR) | (EUR) | (EUR) |
| Belgium |
| BE/10/03 | 20 000 | 20 000 | 100  % | 20 000 | 18 000 |
| Sub-Total | 20 000 | 20 000 | | 20 000 | 18 000 |
| Bulgaria |
| BG/10/02 | 8 181 | 8 181 | 100  % | 8 181 | 7 363 |
| BG/10/05 | 16 362 | 16 362 | 100  % | 16 362 | 14 725 |
| Sub-Total | 24 543 | 24 543 | | 24 543 | 22 088 |
| Denmark |
| DK/10/01 | 1 343 815 | 1 343 815 | 100  % | 1 343 815 | 1 209 434 |
| DK/10/02 | 44 346 | 44 346 | 100  % | 44 346 | 22 173 |
| DK/10/03 | 67 191 | 0 | 100  % | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 1 455 352 | 1 388 161 | | 1 388 161 | 1 231 607 |
| Germany |
| DE/10/05 | 24 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| DE/10/08 | 220 000 | 220 000 | 100  % | 220 000 | 198 000 |
| DE/10/07 | 14 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 258 000 | 220 000 | | 220 000 | 198 000 |
| Estonia |
| EE/10/03 | 60 000 | 60 000 | 100  % | 60 000 | 54 000 |
| Sub-Total | 60 000 | 60 000 | | 60 000 | 54 000 |
| Ireland |
| IE/10/01 | 200 000 | 200 000 | 100  % | 200 000 | 180 000 |
| IE/10/03 | 45 000 | 45 000 | 100  % | 45 000 | 40 500 |
| IE/10/05 | 100 000 | 100 000 | 100  % | 100 000 | 90 000 |
| IE/10/06 | 300 000 | 300 000 | 100  % | 300 000 | 270 000 |
| IE/10/09 | 100 000 | 100 000 | 100  % | 100 000 | 90 000 |
| IE/10/11 | 100 000 | 100 000 | 100  % | 100 000 | 50 000 |
| Sub-Total | 845 000 | 845 000 | | 845 000 | 720 500 |
| Greece |
| EL/10/01 | 400 000 | 400 000 | 100  % | 400 000 | 360 000 |
| EL/10/03 | 1 000 000 | 1 000 000 | 100  % | 1 000 000 | 900 000 |
| EL/10/09 | 1 500 000 | 1 500 000 | 100  % | 1 500 000 | 1 350 000 |
| EL/10/08 | 430 000 | 430 000 | 100  % | 430 000 | 387 000 |
| EL/10/11 | 2 045 000 | 2 045 000 | 35  % | 715 750 | 644 175 |
| Sub-Total | 5 375 000 | 5 375 000 | | 4 045 750 | 3 641 175 |
| Spain |
| ES/10/01-1 | 400 000 | 400 000 | 100  % | 400 000 | 200 000 |
| ES/10/01-2 | 100 000 | 100 000 | 100  % | 100 000 | 50 000 |
| ES/10/05-1 | 28 805 | 28 805 | 100  % | 28 805 | 25 924 |
| ES/10/05-2 | 103 737 | 103 737 | 100  % | 103 737 | 93 364 |
| ES/10/13 | 9 500 | 9 500 | 100  % | 9 500 | 8 550 |
| Sub-Total | 642 042 | 642 042 | | 642 042 | 377 838 |
| France |
| FR/10/01 | 320 000 | 320 000 | 100  % | 320 000 | 288 000 |
| Sub-Total | 320 000 | 320 000 | | 320 000 | 288 000 |
| Italy |
| IT/10/01 | 23 305 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| IT/10/02 | 480 000 | 380 000 | 100  % | 380 000 | 190 000 |
| IT/10/03 | 60 000 | 60 000 | 100  % | 60 000 | 30 000 |
| IT/10/04 | 10 000 | 10 000 | 100  % | 10 000 | 5 000 |
| Sub-Total | 23 855 000 | 450 000 | | 450 000 | 225 000 |
| Cyprus |
| CY/10/02 | 50 000 | 50 000 | 100  % | 50 000 | 45 000 |
| Sub-Total | 50 000 | 50 000 | | 50 000 | 45 000 |
| Lithuania |
| LT/10/01 | 39 389 | 39 389 | 100  % | 39 389 | 35 450 |
| Sub-Total | 39 389 | 39 389 | | 39 389 | 35 450 |
| Netherlands |
| NL/10/01 | 300 000 | 300 000 | 100  % | 300 000 | 270 000 |
| NL/10/02 | 285 000 | 285 000 | 100  % | 285 000 | 256 500 |
| NL/10/03 | 75 000 | 75 000 | 100  % | 75 000 | 67 500 |
| NL/10/04 | 135 000 | 60 000 | 100  % | 60 000 | 30 000 |
| NL/10/07 | 100 000 | 100 000 | 100  % | 100 000 | 90 000 |
| NL/10/08 | 80 000 | 80 000 | 100  % | 80 000 | 72 000 |
| NL/10/10 | 6 000 | 6 000 | 100  % | 6 000 | 3 000 |
| NL/10/11 | 3 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 984 000 | 906 000 | | 906 000 | 789 000 |
| Poland |
| PL/10/01 | 22 600 | 16 000 | 100  % | 16 000 | 8 000 |
| Sub-Total | 22 600 | 16 000 | | 16 000 | 8 000 |
| Slovenia |
| SI/10/03 | 40 000 | 40 000 | 100  % | 40 000 | 36 000 |
| SI/10/04 | 9 000 | 9 000 | 100  % | 9 000 | 4 500 |
| SI/10/05 | 3 158 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 52 158 | 49 000 | | 49 000 | 40 500 |
| Finland |
| FI/10/06 | 40 000 | 40 000 | 100  % | 40 000 | 20 000 |
| Sub-Total | 40 000 | 40 000 | | 40 000 | 20 000 |
| Sweden |
| SE/10/04 | 97 132 | 97 132 | 100  % | 97 132 | 87 419 |
| SE/10/05 | 48 566 | 48 566 | 100  % | 48 566 | 43 709 |
| SE/10/06 | 485 659 | 485 659 | 100  % | 485 659 | 437 093 |
| SE/10/09 | 291 395 | 291 395 | 100  % | 291 395 | 262 256 |
| Sub-Total | 922 752 | 922 752 | | 922 752 | 830 476 |
| United Kingdom |
| UK/10/01 | 2 212 | 2 000 | 100  % | 2 000 | 1 000 |
| UK/10/02 | 5 144 | 4 000 | 100  % | 4 000 | 2 000 |
| UK/10/03 | 4 425 | 4 000 | 100  % | 4 000 | 2 000 |
| UK/10/06 | 3 319 | 3 319 | 100  % | 3 319 | 1 659 |
| UK/10/08 | 6 637 | 6 000 | 100  % | 6 000 | 3 000 |
| UK/10/09 | 7 965 | 7 965 | 100  % | 7 965 | 7 168 |
| UK/10/12 | 27 655 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/14 | 9 403 | 9 403 | 100  % | 9 403 | 8 462 |
| UK/10/40 | 5 531 | 4 000 | 100  % | 4 000 | 2 000 |
| UK/10/48 | 21 815 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/49 | 7 300 | 6 000 | 100  % | 6 000 | 3 000 |
| UK/10/50 | 38 717 | 38 717 | 100  % | 38 717 | 34 844 |
| UK/10/51 | 442 478 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 582 600 | 85 402 | | 85 402 | 65 134 |
| Total | 35 548 436 | 11 453 289 | | 10 124 039 | 8 609 768 |

Member State and project code

Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme

Eligible expenditure

Utilisation rate for control purposes

Net eligible

Maximum Union contribution

(EUR)

(EUR)

(EUR)

(EUR)

Belgium

BE/10/03

20 000

20 000

100  %

20 000

18 000

Sub-Total

20 000

20 000

20 000

18 000

Bulgaria

BG/10/02

8 181

8 181

100  %

8 181

7 363

BG/10/05

16 362

16 362

100  %

16 362

14 725

Sub-Total

24 543

24 543

24 543

22 088

Denmark

DK/10/01

1 343 815

1 343 815

100  %

1 343 815

1 209 434

DK/10/02

44 346

44 346

100  %

44 346

22 173

DK/10/03

67 191

0

100  %

0

0

Sub-Total

1 455 352

1 388 161

1 388 161

1 231 607

Germany

DE/10/05

24 000

0

0

0

DE/10/08

220 000

220 000

100  %

220 000

198 000

DE/10/07

14 000

0

0

0

Sub-Total

258 000

220 000

220 000

198 000

Estonia

EE/10/03

60 000

60 000

100  %

60 000

54 000

Sub-Total

60 000

60 000

60 000

54 000

Ireland

IE/10/01

200 000

200 000

100  %

200 000

180 000

IE/10/03

45 000

45 000

100  %

45 000

40 500

IE/10/05

100 000

100 000

100  %

100 000

90 000

IE/10/06

300 000

300 000

100  %

300 000

270 000

IE/10/09

100 000

100 000

100  %

100 000

90 000

IE/10/11

100 000

100 000

100  %

100 000

50 000

Sub-Total

845 000

845 000

845 000

720 500

Greece

EL/10/01

400 000

400 000

100  %

400 000

360 000

EL/10/03

1 000 000

1 000 000

100  %

1 000 000

900 000

EL/10/09

1 500 000

1 500 000

100  %

1 500 000

1 350 000

EL/10/08

430 000

430 000

100  %

430 000

387 000

EL/10/11

2 045 000

2 045 000

35  %

715 750

644 175

Sub-Total

5 375 000

5 375 000

4 045 750

3 641 175

Spain

ES/10/01-1

400 000

400 000

100  %

400 000

200 000

ES/10/01-2

100 000

100 000

100  %

100 000

50 000

ES/10/05-1

28 805

28 805

100  %

28 805

25 924

ES/10/05-2

103 737

103 737

100  %

103 737

93 364

ES/10/13

9 500

9 500

100  %

9 500

8 550

Sub-Total

642 042

642 042

642 042

377 838

France

FR/10/01

320 000

320 000

100  %

320 000

288 000

Sub-Total

320 000

320 000

320 000

288 000

Italy

IT/10/01

23 305 000

0

0

0

IT/10/02

480 000

380 000

100  %

380 000

190 000

IT/10/03

60 000

60 000

100  %

60 000

30 000

IT/10/04

10 000

10 000

100  %

10 000

5 000

Sub-Total

23 855 000

450 000

450 000

225 000

Cyprus

CY/10/02

50 000

50 000

100  %

50 000

45 000

Sub-Total

50 000

50 000

50 000

45 000

Lithuania

LT/10/01

39 389

39 389

100  %

39 389

35 450

Sub-Total

39 389

39 389

39 389

35 450

Netherlands

NL/10/01

300 000

300 000

100  %

300 000

270 000

NL/10/02

285 000

285 000

100  %

285 000

256 500

NL/10/03

75 000

75 000

100  %

75 000

67 500

NL/10/04

135 000

60 000

100  %

60 000

30 000

NL/10/07

100 000

100 000

100  %

100 000

90 000

NL/10/08

80 000

80 000

100  %

80 000

72 000

NL/10/10

6 000

6 000

100  %

6 000

3 000

NL/10/11

3 000

0

0

0

Sub-Total

984 000

906 000

906 000

789 000

Poland

PL/10/01

22 600

16 000

100  %

16 000

8 000

Sub-Total

22 600

16 000

16 000

8 000

Slovenia

SI/10/03

40 000

40 000

100  %

40 000

36 000

SI/10/04

9 000

9 000

100  %

9 000

4 500

SI/10/05

3 158

0

0

0

Sub-Total

52 158

49 000

49 000

40 500

Finland

FI/10/06

40 000

40 000

100  %

40 000

20 000

Sub-Total

40 000

40 000

40 000

20 000

Sweden

SE/10/04

97 132

97 132

100  %

97 132

87 419

SE/10/05

48 566

48 566

100  %

48 566

43 709

SE/10/06

485 659

485 659

100  %

485 659

437 093

SE/10/09

291 395

291 395

100  %

291 395

262 256

Sub-Total

922 752

922 752

922 752

830 476

United Kingdom

UK/10/01

2 212

2 000

100  %

2 000

1 000

UK/10/02

5 144

4 000

100  %

4 000

2 000

UK/10/03

4 425

4 000

100  %

4 000

2 000

UK/10/06

3 319

3 319

100  %

3 319

1 659

UK/10/08

6 637

6 000

100  %

6 000

3 000

UK/10/09

7 965

7 965

100  %

7 965

7 168

UK/10/12

27 655

0

0

0

UK/10/14

9 403

9 403

100  %

9 403

8 462

UK/10/40

5 531

4 000

100  %

4 000

2 000

UK/10/48

21 815

0

0

0

UK/10/49

7 300

6 000

100  %

6 000

3 000

UK/10/50

38 717

38 717

100  %

38 717

34 844

UK/10/51

442 478

0

0

0

Sub-Total

582 600

85 402

85 402

65 134

Total

35 548 436

11 453 289

10 124 039

8 609 768

---

ANNEX II

AUTOMATIC LOCALISATION DEVICES

| (in EUR) |
| --- |
| Member State and project code | Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme | Eligible expenditure | Maximum Union contribution |
| Bulgaria |
| BG/10/04 | 102 260 | 102 260 | 92 034 |
| Sub-Total | 102 260 | 102 260 | 92 034 |
| Germany |
| DE/10/12 | 465 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 465 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Greece |
| EL/10/10 | 1 000 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 1 000 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Spain |
| ES/10/02 | 90 000 | 90 000 | 75 000 |
| ES/10/07 | 448 200 | 448 200 | 403 380 |
| ES/10/12 | 132 470 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 670 670 | 538 200 | 478 380 |
| France |
| FR/10/03 | 500 000 | 500 000 | 450 000 |
| Sub-Total | 500 000 | 500 000 | 450 000 |
| Netherlands |
| NL/10/04 | 875 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 875 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Slovenia |
| SI/10/01 | 182 649 | 182 649 | 95 000 |
| Sub-Total | 182 649 | 182 649 | 95 000 |
| Finland |
| FI/10/04 | 100 000 | 100 000 | 90 000 |
| Sub-Total | 100 000 | 100 000 | 90 000 |
| Sweden |
| SE/10/07 | 186 979 | 186 979 | 168 281 |
| SE/10/08 | 97 131 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 284 110 | 186 979 | 168 281 |
| United Kingdom |
| UK/10/61 | 5 531 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/62 | 6 637 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 12 168 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 191 857 | 1 610 087 | 1 373 695 |

(in EUR)

Member State and project code

Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme

Eligible expenditure

Maximum Union contribution

Bulgaria

BG/10/04

102 260

102 260

92 034

Sub-Total

102 260

102 260

92 034

Germany

DE/10/12

465 000

0

0

Sub-Total

465 000

0

0

Greece

EL/10/10

1 000 000

0

0

Sub-Total

1 000 000

0

0

Spain

ES/10/02

90 000

90 000

75 000

ES/10/07

448 200

448 200

403 380

ES/10/12

132 470

0

0

Sub-Total

670 670

538 200

478 380

France

FR/10/03

500 000

500 000

450 000

Sub-Total

500 000

500 000

450 000

Netherlands

NL/10/04

875 000

0

0

Sub-Total

875 000

0

0

Slovenia

SI/10/01

182 649

182 649

95 000

Sub-Total

182 649

182 649

95 000

Finland

FI/10/04

100 000

100 000

90 000

Sub-Total

100 000

100 000

90 000

Sweden

SE/10/07

186 979

186 979

168 281

SE/10/08

97 131

0

0

Sub-Total

284 110

186 979

168 281

United Kingdom

UK/10/61

5 531

0

0

UK/10/62

6 637

0

0

Sub-Total

12 168

0

0

Total

4 191 857

1 610 087

1 373 695

---

ANNEX III

ELECTRONIC RECORDING AND REPORTING SYSTEMS

| (in EUR) |
| --- |
| Member State and project code | Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme | Eligible expenditure | Maximum Union contribution |
| Belgium |
| BE/10/01 | 9 270 | 9 270 | 8 343 |
| Sub-Total | 9 270 | 9 270 | 8 343 |
| Denmark |
| DK/10/04 | 201 572 | 201 572 | 181 415 |
| DK/10/05 | 100 786 | 100 786 | 90 708 |
| DK/10/06 | 134 382 | 134 382 | 120 943 |
| DK/10/07 | 503 931 | 503 931 | 453 538 |
| DK/10/08 | 201 572 | 201 572 | 181 415 |
| DK/10/09 | 67 191 | 67 191 | 60 472 |
| DK/10/10 | 268 763 | 268 763 | 241 887 |
| Sub-Total | 1 478 197 | 1 478 197 | 1 330 377 |
| Germany |
| DE/10/13 | 350 000 | 350 000 | 315 000 |
| DE/10/14 | 50 000 | 50 000 | 45 000 |
| DE/10/15 | 60 000 | 0 | 0 |
| DE/10/16 | 30 000 | 30 000 | 27 000 |
| DE/10/17 | 100 000 | 100 000 | 90 000 |
| Sub-Total | 590 000 | 530 000 | 477 000 |
| Ireland |
| IE/10/10 | 80 000 | 80 000 | 72 000 |
| IE/10/12 | 150 000 | 150 000 | 135 000 |
| Sub-Total | 230 000 | 230 000 | 207 000 |
| Spain |
| ES/10/03-2 | 300 000 | 300 000 | 270 000 |
| Sub-Total | 300 000 | 300 000 | 270 000 |
| France |
| FR/10/02 | 811 120 | 811 120 | 730 008 |
| Sub-Total | 811 120 | 811 120 | 730 008 |
| Cyprus |
| CY/10/01 | 300 000 | 300 000 | 270 000 |
| Sub-Total | 300 000 | 300 000 | 270 000 |
| Lithuania |
| LT/10/02 | 379 612 | 379 612 | 341 651 |
| Sub-Total | 379 612 | 379 612 | 341 651 |
| Netherlands |
| NL/10/09 | 700 000 | 700 000 | 630 000 |
| Sub-Total | 700 000 | 700 000 | 630 000 |
| Poland |
| PL/10/02 | 560 000 | 560 000 | 504 000 |
| Sub-Total | 560 000 | 560 000 | 504 000 |
| Romania |
| RO/10/04 | 93 600 | 93 600 | 84 240 |
| Sub-Total | 93 600 | 93 600 | 84 240 |
| Slovenia |
| SI/10/02-01 | 246 000 | 246 000 | 221 400 |
| Sub-Total | 246 000 | 246 000 | 221 400 |
| Finland |
| FI/10/01 | 300 000 | 300 000 | 270 000 |
| FI/10/02 | 400 000 | 400 000 | 360 000 |
| Sub-Total | 700 000 | 700 000 | 630 000 |
| Sweden |
| SE/10/01 | 339 961 | 339 961 | 305 965 |
| SE/10/03 | 339 961 | 339 961 | 305 965 |
| Sub-Total | 679 922 | 679 922 | 611 930 |
| Total | 7 077 720 | 7 017 720 | 6 315 949 |

(in EUR)

Member State and project code

Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme

Eligible expenditure

Maximum Union contribution

Belgium

BE/10/01

9 270

9 270

8 343

Sub-Total

9 270

9 270

8 343

Denmark

DK/10/04

201 572

201 572

181 415

DK/10/05

100 786

100 786

90 708

DK/10/06

134 382

134 382

120 943

DK/10/07

503 931

503 931

453 538

DK/10/08

201 572

201 572

181 415

DK/10/09

67 191

67 191

60 472

DK/10/10

268 763

268 763

241 887

Sub-Total

1 478 197

1 478 197

1 330 377

Germany

DE/10/13

350 000

350 000

315 000

DE/10/14

50 000

50 000

45 000

DE/10/15

60 000

0

0

DE/10/16

30 000

30 000

27 000

DE/10/17

100 000

100 000

90 000

Sub-Total

590 000

530 000

477 000

Ireland

IE/10/10

80 000

80 000

72 000

IE/10/12

150 000

150 000

135 000

Sub-Total

230 000

230 000

207 000

Spain

ES/10/03-2

300 000

300 000

270 000

Sub-Total

300 000

300 000

270 000

France

FR/10/02

811 120

811 120

730 008

Sub-Total

811 120

811 120

730 008

Cyprus

CY/10/01

300 000

300 000

270 000

Sub-Total

300 000

300 000

270 000

Lithuania

LT/10/02

379 612

379 612

341 651

Sub-Total

379 612

379 612

341 651

Netherlands

NL/10/09

700 000

700 000

630 000

Sub-Total

700 000

700 000

630 000

Poland

PL/10/02

560 000

560 000

504 000

Sub-Total

560 000

560 000

504 000

Romania

RO/10/04

93 600

93 600

84 240

Sub-Total

93 600

93 600

84 240

Slovenia

SI/10/02-01

246 000

246 000

221 400

Sub-Total

246 000

246 000

221 400

Finland

FI/10/01

300 000

300 000

270 000

FI/10/02

400 000

400 000

360 000

Sub-Total

700 000

700 000

630 000

Sweden

SE/10/01

339 961

339 961

305 965

SE/10/03

339 961

339 961

305 965

Sub-Total

679 922

679 922

611 930

Total

7 077 720

7 017 720

6 315 949

---

ANNEX IV

ELECTRONIC RECORDING AND REPORTING DEVICES

| (in EUR) |
| --- |
| Member State and project code | Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme | Eligible expenditure | Maximum Union contribution |
| Belgium |
| BE/10/02 | 225 000 | 225 000 | 150 000 |
| Sub-Total | 225 000 | 225 000 | 150 000 |
| Germany |
| DE/10/10 | 84 000 | 84 000 | 75 600 |
| Sub-Total | 84 000 | 84 000 | 75 600 |
| Estonia |
| EE/10/01 | 160 000 | 160 000 | 144 000 |
| Sub-Total | 160 000 | 160 000 | 144 000 |
| Spain |
| ES/10/03-1 | 6 912 000 | 6 912 000 | 6 220 800 |
| Sub-Total | 6 912 000 | 6 912 000 | 6 220 800 |
| France |
| FR/10/08 | 1 098 000 | 1 098 000 | 732 000 |
| FR/10/07 | 1 109 250 | 188 648 | 150 000 |
| Sub-Total | 2 207 250 | 1 286 648 | 882 000 |
| Slovenia |
| SI/10-02-02 | 24 000 | 24 000 | 21 600 |
| Sub-Total | 24 000 | 24 000 | 21 600 |
| Sweden |
| SE/10/02 | 291 395 | 291 395 | 262 256 |
| Sub-Total | 291 395 | 291 395 | 262 256 |
| United Kingdom |
| UK/10/52 | 774 336 | 774 336 | 696 903 |
| Sub-Total | 774 336 | 774 336 | 696 903 |
| Total | 10 677 981 | 9 757 379 | 8 453 159 |

(in EUR)

Member State and project code

Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme

Eligible expenditure

Maximum Union contribution

Belgium

BE/10/02

225 000

225 000

150 000

Sub-Total

225 000

225 000

150 000

Germany

DE/10/10

84 000

84 000

75 600

Sub-Total

84 000

84 000

75 600

Estonia

EE/10/01

160 000

160 000

144 000

Sub-Total

160 000

160 000

144 000

Spain

ES/10/03-1

6 912 000

6 912 000

6 220 800

Sub-Total

6 912 000

6 912 000

6 220 800

France

FR/10/08

1 098 000

1 098 000

732 000

FR/10/07

1 109 250

188 648

150 000

Sub-Total

2 207 250

1 286 648

882 000

Slovenia

SI/10-02-02

24 000

24 000

21 600

Sub-Total

24 000

24 000

21 600

Sweden

SE/10/02

291 395

291 395

262 256

Sub-Total

291 395

291 395

262 256

United Kingdom

UK/10/52

774 336

774 336

696 903

Sub-Total

774 336

774 336

696 903

Total

10 677 981

9 757 379

8 453 159

---

ANNEX V

PILOT PROJECTS

| (in EUR) |
| --- |
| Member State and project code | Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme | Eligible expenditure | Maximum Union contribution |
| Denmark |
| DK/10/11 | 67 191 | 67 191 | 60 472 |
| Total | 67 191 | 67 191 | 60 472 |

(in EUR)

Member State and project code

Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme

Eligible expenditure

Maximum Union contribution

Denmark

DK/10/11

67 191

67 191

60 472

Total

67 191

67 191

60 472

---

ANNEX VI

TRAINING AND EXCHANGE PROGRAMMES

| (in EUR) |
| --- |
| Member State and project code | Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme | Eligible expenditure | Maximum Union contribution |
| Bulgaria |
| BG/10/01 | 40 904 | 40 904 | 20 452 |
| BG/10/03 | 15 339 | 15 339 | 7 669 |
| Sub-Total | 56 243 | 56 243 | 28 122 |
| Denmark |
| DK/10/12 | 87 348 | 87 348 | 43 674 |
| DK/10/13 | 51 737 | 51 737 | 25 868 |
| DK/10/14 | 75 926 | 75 926 | 37 963 |
| Sub-Total | 215 010 | 215 010 | 107 505 |
| Germany |
| DE/10/04 | 11 800 | 0 | 0 |
| DE/10/11 | 130 000 | 130 000 | 65 000 |
| DE/10/18 | 120 000 | 120 000 | 60 000 |
| Sub-Total | 261 800 | 250 000 | 125 000 |
| Estonia |
| EE/10/04 | 3 000 | 3 000 | 1 500 |
| Sub-Total | 3 000 | 3 000 | 1 500 |
| Ireland |
| IE/10/02 | 150 000 | 50 000 | 25 000 |
| IE/10/08 | 20 000 | 20 000 | 10 000 |
| Sub-Total | 170 000 | 70 000 | 35 000 |
| Greece |
| EL/10/11 | 40 000 | 40 000 | 20 000 |
| Sub-Total | 40 000 | 40 000 | 20 000 |
| Spain |
| ES/10/03-3 | 20 000 | 20 000 | 10 000 |
| ES/10/04-3 | 30 240 | 0 | 0 |
| ES/10/04-2 | 10 000 | 10 000 | 5 000 |
| ES/10/14 | 8 225 | 0 | 0 |
| ES/10/09 | 22 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 90 465 | 30 000 | 15 000 |
| France |
| FR/10/04 | 70 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 70 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Italy |
| IT/10/07 | 24 000 | 24 000 | 12 000 |
| IT/10/08 | 51 600 | 51 600 | 25 800 |
| IT/10/09 | 250 000 | 0 | 0 |
| IT/10/10 | 150 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 475 600 | 75 600 | 37 800 |
| Cyprus |
| CYP/10/03 | 7 800 | 7 800 | 3 900 |
| Sub-Total | 7 800 | 7 800 | 3 900 |
| Lithuania |
| LT/10/03 | 25 000 | 25 000 | 12 500 |
| Sub-Total | 25 000 | 25 000 | 12 500 |
| Netherlands |
| NL/10/12 | 20 000 | 0 | 0 |
| NL/10/13 | 20 000 | 0 | 0 |
| NL/10/14 | 10 000 | 10 000 | 5 000 |
| Sub-Total | 50 000 | 10 000 | 5 000 |
| Poland |
| PL/10/03 | 50 000 | 50 000 | 25 000 |
| Sub-Total | 50 000 | 50 000 | 25 000 |
| Romania |
| RO/10/02 | 50 000 | 50 000 | 25 000 |
| RO/10/03 | 50 000 | 50 000 | 25 000 |
| Sub-Total | 100 000 | 100 000 | 50 000 |
| Finland |
| FI/10/03 | 26 000 | 26 000 | 13 000 |
| Sub-Total | 26 000 | 26 000 | 13 000 |
| Sweden |
| SE/10/10 | 174 837 | 58 279 | 29 140 |
| Sub-Total | 174 837 | 58 279 | 29 140 |
| United Kingdom |
| UK/10/07 | 2 212 | 2 212 | 1 106 |
| UK/10/15 | 9 695 | 9 695 | 4 847 |
| UK/10/16 | 2 729 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/17 | 4 507 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/18 | 93 405 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/19 | 3 655 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/20 | 12 824 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/21 | 3 312 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/22 | 11 403 | 11 403 | 5 701 |
| UK/10/23 | 11 097 | 11 097 | 5 549 |
| UK/10/24 | 6 750 | 6 750 | 3 375 |
| UK/10/25 | 9 978 | 9 978 | 4 989 |
| UK/10/26 | 9 978 | 9 978 | 4 989 |
| UK/10/27 | 32 313 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/28 | 7 200 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/29 | 9 978 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/30 | 9 978 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/31 | 9 978 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/32 | 13 382 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/33 | 6 750 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/34 | 6 307 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/35 | 12 824 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/36 | 9 978 | 9 978 | 4 989 |
| UK/10/37 | 4 960 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/38 | 8 384 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/39 | 6 588 | 6 588 | 3 294 |
| UK/10/41 | 3 319 | 3 319 | 1 659 |
| UK/10/42 | 442 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/43 | 442 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/44 | 442 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/54 | 2 084 | 2 084 | 1 042 |
| UK/10/55 | 365 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/56 | 243 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/57 | 216 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/58 | 127 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/59 | 1 161 | 0 | 0 |
| UK/10/60 | 513 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 329 522 | 83 082 | 41 541 |
| Total | 2 145 278 | 1 100 014 | 550 008 |

(in EUR)

Member State and project code

Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme

Eligible expenditure

Maximum Union contribution

Bulgaria

BG/10/01

40 904

40 904

20 452

BG/10/03

15 339

15 339

7 669

Sub-Total

56 243

56 243

28 122

Denmark

DK/10/12

87 348

87 348

43 674

DK/10/13

51 737

51 737

25 868

DK/10/14

75 926

75 926

37 963

Sub-Total

215 010

215 010

107 505

Germany

DE/10/04

11 800

0

0

DE/10/11

130 000

130 000

65 000

DE/10/18

120 000

120 000

60 000

Sub-Total

261 800

250 000

125 000

Estonia

EE/10/04

3 000

3 000

1 500

Sub-Total

3 000

3 000

1 500

Ireland

IE/10/02

150 000

50 000

25 000

IE/10/08

20 000

20 000

10 000

Sub-Total

170 000

70 000

35 000

Greece

EL/10/11

40 000

40 000

20 000

Sub-Total

40 000

40 000

20 000

Spain

ES/10/03-3

20 000

20 000

10 000

ES/10/04-3

30 240

0

0

ES/10/04-2

10 000

10 000

5 000

ES/10/14

8 225

0

0

ES/10/09

22 000

0

0

Sub-Total

90 465

30 000

15 000

France

FR/10/04

70 000

0

0

Sub-Total

70 000

0

0

Italy

IT/10/07

24 000

24 000

12 000

IT/10/08

51 600

51 600

25 800

IT/10/09

250 000

0

0

IT/10/10

150 000

0

0

Sub-Total

475 600

75 600

37 800

Cyprus

CYP/10/03

7 800

7 800

3 900

Sub-Total

7 800

7 800

3 900

Lithuania

LT/10/03

25 000

25 000

12 500

Sub-Total

25 000

25 000

12 500

Netherlands

NL/10/12

20 000

0

0

NL/10/13

20 000

0

0

NL/10/14

10 000

10 000

5 000

Sub-Total

50 000

10 000

5 000

Poland

PL/10/03

50 000

50 000

25 000

Sub-Total

50 000

50 000

25 000

Romania

RO/10/02

50 000

50 000

25 000

RO/10/03

50 000

50 000

25 000

Sub-Total

100 000

100 000

50 000

Finland

FI/10/03

26 000

26 000

13 000

Sub-Total

26 000

26 000

13 000

Sweden

SE/10/10

174 837

58 279

29 140

Sub-Total

174 837

58 279

29 140

United Kingdom

UK/10/07

2 212

2 212

1 106

UK/10/15

9 695

9 695

4 847

UK/10/16

2 729

0

0

UK/10/17

4 507

0

0

UK/10/18

93 405

0

0

UK/10/19

3 655

0

0

UK/10/20

12 824

0

0

UK/10/21

3 312

0

0

UK/10/22

11 403

11 403

5 701

UK/10/23

11 097

11 097

5 549

UK/10/24

6 750

6 750

3 375

UK/10/25

9 978

9 978

4 989

UK/10/26

9 978

9 978

4 989

UK/10/27

32 313

0

0

UK/10/28

7 200

0

0

UK/10/29

9 978

0

0

UK/10/30

9 978

0

0

UK/10/31

9 978

0

0

UK/10/32

13 382

0

0

UK/10/33

6 750

0

0

UK/10/34

6 307

0

0

UK/10/35

12 824

0

0

UK/10/36

9 978

9 978

4 989

UK/10/37

4 960

0

0

UK/10/38

8 384

0

0

UK/10/39

6 588

6 588

3 294

UK/10/41

3 319

3 319

1 659

UK/10/42

442

0

0

UK/10/43

442

0

0

UK/10/44

442

0

0

UK/10/54

2 084

2 084

1 042

UK/10/55

365

0

0

UK/10/56

243

0

0

UK/10/57

216

0

0

UK/10/58

127

0

0

UK/10/59

1 161

0

0

UK/10/60

513

0

0

Sub-Total

329 522

83 082

41 541

Total

2 145 278

1 100 014

550 008

---

ANNEX VII

PILOT INSPECTION AND OBSERVER SCHEMES

| (in EUR) |
| --- |
| Member State and project code | Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme | Eligible expenditure | Maximum Union contribution |
| Spain |
| ES/10/17 | 138 500 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 138 500 | 0 | 0 |

(in EUR)

Member State and project code

Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme

Eligible expenditure

Maximum Union contribution

Spain

ES/10/17

138 500

0

0

Total

138 500

0

0

---

ANNEX VIII

INITIATIVES RAISING AWARENESS OF CFP RULES

| (in EUR) |
| --- |
| Member State and project code | Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme | Eligible expenditure | Maximum Union contribution |
| Bulgaria |
| BG/10/06 | 12 782 | 12 782 | 11 504 |
| Sub-Total | 12 782 | 12 782 | 11 504 |
| Ireland |
| IE/10/13 | 50 000 | 50 000 | 35 000 |
| Sub-Total | 50 000 | 50 000 | 35 000 |
| Greece |
| EL/10/02 | 500 000 | 500 000 | 450 000 |
| Sub-Total | 500 000 | 500 000 | 450 000 |
| Spain |
| ES/10/08 | 645 851 | 645 851 | 322 926 |
| ES/10/11 | 60 000 | 60 000 | 30 000 |
| ES/10/04-1 | 20 000 | 20 000 | 18 000 |
| Sub-Total | 725 851 | 725 851 | 370 926 |
| Italy |
| IT/10/11 | 280 000 | 100 000 | 50 000 |
| Sub-Total | 280 000 | 100 000 | 50 000 |
| Lithuania |
| LT/10/04 | 16 000 | 16 000 | 14 400 |
| Sub-Total | 16 000 | 16 000 | 14 400 |
| Poland |
| PL/10/04 | 70 000 | 70 000 | 63 000 |
| Sub-Total | 70 000 | 70 000 | 63 000 |
| Finland |
| FI/10/05 | 15 000 | 15 000 | 13 500 |
| Sub-Total | 15 000 | 15 000 | 13 500 |
| Slovenia |
| SI/10/06 | 6 000 | 6 000 | 5 400 |
| Sub-Total | 6 000 | 6 000 | 5 400 |
| Total | 1 675 633 | 1 495 633 | 1 013 730 |

(in EUR)

Member State and project code

Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme

Eligible expenditure

Maximum Union contribution

Bulgaria

BG/10/06

12 782

12 782

11 504

Sub-Total

12 782

12 782

11 504

Ireland

IE/10/13

50 000

50 000

35 000

Sub-Total

50 000

50 000

35 000

Greece

EL/10/02

500 000

500 000

450 000

Sub-Total

500 000

500 000

450 000

Spain

ES/10/08

645 851

645 851

322 926

ES/10/11

60 000

60 000

30 000

ES/10/04-1

20 000

20 000

18 000

Sub-Total

725 851

725 851

370 926

Italy

IT/10/11

280 000

100 000

50 000

Sub-Total

280 000

100 000

50 000

Lithuania

LT/10/04

16 000

16 000

14 400

Sub-Total

16 000

16 000

14 400

Poland

PL/10/04

70 000

70 000

63 000

Sub-Total

70 000

70 000

63 000

Finland

FI/10/05

15 000

15 000

13 500

Sub-Total

15 000

15 000

13 500

Slovenia

SI/10/06

6 000

6 000

5 400

Sub-Total

6 000

6 000

5 400

Total

1 675 633

1 495 633

1 013 730

---

ANNEX IX

PATROL VESSELS AND AIRCRAFT

| Member State and project code | Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme
  (EUR) | Eligible expenditure
  (EUR) | Utilisation rate for control purposes | Net eligible
  (EUR) | Maximum Union contribution
  (EUR)
  (50 % limited to 1 million) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Germany |
| DE/10/01 | 45 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| DE/10/02 | 36 000 | 36 000 | 100  % | 36 000 | 18 000 |
| DE/10/06 | 4 527 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| DE/10/09 | 151 261 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 4 759 261 | 36 000 | | 36 000 | 18 000 |
| Estonia |
| EE/10/02 | 16 745 | 16 745 | 100  % | 16 745 | 8 373 |
| Sub-Total | 16 745 | 16 745 | | 16 745 | 8 373 |
| Ireland |
| IE/10/04 | 200 000 | 200 000 | 100  % | 200 000 | 100 000 |
| IE/10/07 | 50 000 000 | 50 000 000 | 90  % | 45 000 000 | 900 000 |
| Sub-Total | 50 200 000 | 50 200 000 | | 45 200 000 | 1 000 000 |
| Greece |
| EL/10/04 | 2 000 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| EL/10/05 | 180 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| EL/10/06 | 4 500 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| EL/10/07 | 5 000 000 | 5 000 000 | 50  % | 2 500 000 | 1 000 000 |
| Sub-Total | 11 680 000 | 5 000 000 | | 2 500 000 | 1 000 000 |
| Spain |
| ES/10/15 | 5 000 | 5 000 | 100  % | 5 000 | 2 500 |
| ES/10/16 | 34 470 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| ES/10/10 | 44 248 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 83 718 | 5 000 | | 5 000 | 2 500 |
| France |
| FR/10/05 | 48 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| FR/10/06 | 580 000 | 580 000 | 100  % | 580 000 | 290 000 |
| Sub-Total | 628 000 | 580 000 | | 580 000 | 290 000 |
| Italy |
| IT/10/05 | 40 000 | 0 | | 0 | 0 |
| IT/10/06 | 2 000 000 | 2 000 000 | 100  % | 2 000 000 | 1 000 000 |
| Sub-Total | 2 040 000 | 2 000 000 | | 2 000 000 | 1 000 000 |
| Netherlands |
| NL/10/05 | 200 000 | 0 | | | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 200 000 | 0 | | | 0 |
| Romania |
| RO/10/01 | 400 000 | 400 000 | 100  % | 400 000 | 200 000 |
| Sub-Total | 400 000 | 400 000 | | 400 000 | 200 000 |
| Finland |
| FI/10/07 | 100 000 | 0 | | | 0 |
| Sub-Total | 100 000 | 0 | | | 0 |
| United Kingdom |
| UK/10/04 | 387 168 | 387 168 | 100  % | 387 168 | 193 584 |
| UK/10/05 | 3 761 | 3 761 | 100  % | 3 761 | 1 881 |
| UK/10/10 | 8 850 | 8 850 | 100  % | 8 850 | 4 425 |
| UK/10/11 | 30 973 | 30 973 | 100  % | 30 973 | 15 487 |
| UK/10/45 | 27 655 | 27 655 | 100  % | 27 655 | 13 827 |
| UK/10/47 | 6 637 | 6 637 | 100  % | 6 637 | 3 319 |
| UK/10/53 | 664 | 664 | 100  % | 664 | 332 |
| Sub-Total | 465 708 | 465 708 | | 465 708 | 232 854 |
| Total | 70 573 431 | 58 703 453 | | 51 203 453 | 3 751 727 |

Member State and project code

Expenditure planned in the national fisheries control programme

(EUR)

Eligible expenditure

(EUR)

Utilisation rate for control purposes

Net eligible

(EUR)

Maximum Union contribution

(EUR)

(50 % limited to 1 million)

Germany

DE/10/01

45 000

0

0

0

DE/10/02

36 000

36 000

100  %

36 000

18 000

DE/10/06

4 527 000

0

0

0

DE/10/09

151 261

0

0

0

Sub-Total

4 759 261

36 000

36 000

18 000

Estonia

EE/10/02

16 745

16 745

100  %

16 745

8 373

Sub-Total

16 745

16 745

16 745

8 373

Ireland

IE/10/04

200 000

200 000

100  %

200 000

100 000

IE/10/07

50 000 000

50 000 000

90  %

45 000 000

900 000

Sub-Total

50 200 000

50 200 000

45 200 000

1 000 000

Greece

EL/10/04

2 000 000

0

0

0

EL/10/05

180 000

0

0

0

EL/10/06

4 500 000

0

0

0

EL/10/07

5 000 000

5 000 000

50  %

2 500 000

1 000 000

Sub-Total

11 680 000

5 000 000

2 500 000

1 000 000

Spain

ES/10/15

5 000

5 000

100  %

5 000

2 500

ES/10/16

34 470

0

0

0

ES/10/10

44 248

0

0

0

Sub-Total

83 718

5 000

5 000

2 500

France

FR/10/05

48 000

0

0

0

FR/10/06

580 000

580 000

100  %

580 000

290 000

Sub-Total

628 000

580 000

580 000

290 000

Italy

IT/10/05

40 000

0

0

0

IT/10/06

2 000 000

2 000 000

100  %

2 000 000

1 000 000

Sub-Total

2 040 000

2 000 000

2 000 000

1 000 000

Netherlands

NL/10/05

200 000

0

0

Sub-Total

200 000

0

0

Romania

RO/10/01

400 000

400 000

100  %

400 000

200 000

Sub-Total

400 000

400 000

400 000

200 000

Finland

FI/10/07

100 000

0

0

Sub-Total

100 000

0

0

United Kingdom

UK/10/04

387 168

387 168

100  %

387 168

193 584

UK/10/05

3 761

3 761

100  %

3 761

1 881

UK/10/10

8 850

8 850

100  %

8 850

4 425

UK/10/11

30 973

30 973

100  %

30 973

15 487

UK/10/45

27 655

27 655

100  %

27 655

13 827

UK/10/47

6 637

6 637

100  %

6 637

3 319

UK/10/53

664

664

100  %

664

332

Sub-Total

465 708

465 708

465 708

232 854

Total

70 573 431

58 703 453

51 203 453

3 751 727

---

| 26.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/26

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 24 June 2010

allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances amisulbrom, chlorantraniliprole, meptyldinocap and pinoxaden

(notified under document C(2010) 4177)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2010/353/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1), and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in March 2006 the United Kingdom received an application from Nissan Chemical Europe SARL for the inclusion of the active substance amisulbrom in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2007/669/EC (2) confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in March 2006 the United Kingdom received an application from Nissan Chemical Europe SARL for the inclusion of the active substance amisulbrom in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2007/669/EC (2) confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.

| (2) | In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in February 2007 Ireland received an application from DuPont International Operations SARL for the inclusion of the active substance chlorantraniliprole in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2007/560/EC (3) confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in February 2007 Ireland received an application from DuPont International Operations SARL for the inclusion of the active substance chlorantraniliprole in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2007/560/EC (3) confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in August 2005 the United Kingdom received an application from Dow Agrosciences for the inclusion of the active substance meptyldinocap in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2006/589/EC (4) confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in August 2005 the United Kingdom received an application from Dow Agrosciences for the inclusion of the active substance meptyldinocap in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2006/589/EC (4) confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.

| (4) | In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in March 2004 the United Kingdom received an application from Syngenta Ltd for the inclusion of the active substance pinoxaden in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2005/459/EC (5) confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in March 2004 the United Kingdom received an application from Syngenta Ltd for the inclusion of the active substance pinoxaden in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2005/459/EC (5) confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.

| (5) | Confirmation of the completeness of the dossiers was necessary in order to allow them to be examined in detail and to allow Member States the possibility of granting provisional authorisations, for periods of up to three years, for plant protection products containing the active substances concerned, while complying with the conditions laid down in Article 8(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC and, in particular, the condition relating to the detailed assessment of the active substances and the plant protection products in the light of the requirements laid down by that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Confirmation of the completeness of the dossiers was necessary in order to allow them to be examined in detail and to allow Member States the possibility of granting provisional authorisations, for periods of up to three years, for plant protection products containing the active substances concerned, while complying with the conditions laid down in Article 8(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC and, in particular, the condition relating to the detailed assessment of the active substances and the plant protection products in the light of the requirements laid down by that Directive.

| (6) | For these active substances, the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, for the uses proposed by the applicants. The rapporteur Member States submitted the respective draft assessment reports to the Commission on 15 July 2008 (amisulbrom), on 11 February 2009 (chlorantraniliprole), on 25 October 2006 (meptyldinocap) and on 30 November 2005 (pinoxaden). |
| --- | --- |

(6)

For these active substances, the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, for the uses proposed by the applicants. The rapporteur Member States submitted the respective draft assessment reports to the Commission on 15 July 2008 (amisulbrom), on 11 February 2009 (chlorantraniliprole), on 25 October 2006 (meptyldinocap) and on 30 November 2005 (pinoxaden).

| (7) | Following submission of the draft assessment reports by the rapporteur Member States, it has been found to be necessary to request further information from the applicants and to have the rapporteur Member States examine that information and submit their assessment. Therefore, the examination of the dossiers is still ongoing and it will not be possible to complete the evaluation within the timeframe provided for in Directive 91/414/EEC, read in conjunction with Commission Decision 2008/724/EC (6) (pinoxaden). |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Following submission of the draft assessment reports by the rapporteur Member States, it has been found to be necessary to request further information from the applicants and to have the rapporteur Member States examine that information and submit their assessment. Therefore, the examination of the dossiers is still ongoing and it will not be possible to complete the evaluation within the timeframe provided for in Directive 91/414/EEC, read in conjunction with Commission Decision 2008/724/EC (6) (pinoxaden).

| (8) | As the evaluation so far has not identified any reason for immediate concern, Member States should be given the possibility of prolonging provisional authorisations granted for plant protection products containing the active substances concerned for a period of 24 months in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC so as to enable the examination of the dossiers to continue. It is expected that the evaluation and decision-making process with respect to a decision on a possible inclusion in Annex I to that Directive for amisulbrom, chlorantraniliprole, meptyldinocap and pinoxaden will have been completed within 24 months. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

As the evaluation so far has not identified any reason for immediate concern, Member States should be given the possibility of prolonging provisional authorisations granted for plant protection products containing the active substances concerned for a period of 24 months in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC so as to enable the examination of the dossiers to continue. It is expected that the evaluation and decision-making process with respect to a decision on a possible inclusion in Annex I to that Directive for amisulbrom, chlorantraniliprole, meptyldinocap and pinoxaden will have been completed within 24 months.

| (9) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Member States may extend provisional authorisations for plant protection products containing amisulbrom, chlorantraniliprole, meptyldinocap or pinoxaden for a period ending on 30 June 2012 at the latest.

Article 2

This Decision shall expire on 30 June 2012.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 June 2010.

For the Commission

John DALLI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 274, 18.10.2007, p. 15.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 213, 15.8.2007, p. 29.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 240, 2.9.2006, p. 9.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 160, 23.6.2005, p. 32.

5

(6)  
  OJ L 245, 13.9.2008, p. 15.

6

---

| 26.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/28

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 25 June 2010

amending Decision 2008/855/EC as regards animal health control measures relating to classical swine fever in feral pigs

(notified under document C(2010) 4170)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2010/354/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2) and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2008/855/EC of 3 November 2008 concerning animal health control measures relating to classical swine fever in certain Member States (3) lays down certain control measures in relation to classical swine fever in the Member States or regions thereof set out in the Annex to that Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2008/855/EC of 3 November 2008 concerning animal health control measures relating to classical swine fever in certain Member States (3) lays down certain control measures in relation to classical swine fever in the Member States or regions thereof set out in the Annex to that Decision.

| (2) | The Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC comprises three parts, depending on the epidemiological situation in the areas listed therein. Parts I and II of that Annex list the areas in the Member States where the epidemiological situation with regard to feral pigs is considered to be most favourable. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC comprises three parts, depending on the epidemiological situation in the areas listed therein. Parts I and II of that Annex list the areas in the Member States where the epidemiological situation with regard to feral pigs is considered to be most favourable.

| (3) | Although feral pigs are included in the scope of Decision 2008/855/EC, the control measures provided for in that Decision are primarily targeting pigs from holdings and products derived therefrom. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Although feral pigs are included in the scope of Decision 2008/855/EC, the control measures provided for in that Decision are primarily targeting pigs from holdings and products derived therefrom.

| (4) | Commission Decision 2002/106/EC (4) sets out the diagnostic procedures, sampling methods and criteria for evaluation of the laboratory tests for the confirmation of classical swine fever. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Commission Decision 2002/106/EC (4) sets out the diagnostic procedures, sampling methods and criteria for evaluation of the laboratory tests for the confirmation of classical swine fever.

| (5) | In order to better control the spread of classical swine fever, it is appropriate to provide for certain animal health control measures targeting the feral pig population affected by that disease. In particular, a prohibition on the dispatch from the areas listed in the Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC of consignments of live feral pigs and of fresh meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat should be laid down. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In order to better control the spread of classical swine fever, it is appropriate to provide for certain animal health control measures targeting the feral pig population affected by that disease. In particular, a prohibition on the dispatch from the areas listed in the Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC of consignments of live feral pigs and of fresh meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat should be laid down.

| (6) | It is however appropriate to permit that consignments of fresh meat of feral pigs, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat be dispatched from those areas to other areas not listed in the Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC, provided that virological tests are performed in accordance with Decision 2002/106/EC, that the results of those tests are negative and that the competent veterinary authority of the place of destination gives its prior approval. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

It is however appropriate to permit that consignments of fresh meat of feral pigs, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat be dispatched from those areas to other areas not listed in the Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC, provided that virological tests are performed in accordance with Decision 2002/106/EC, that the results of those tests are negative and that the competent veterinary authority of the place of destination gives its prior approval.

| (7) | Decision 2008/855/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Decision 2008/855/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (8) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following Article 8b is inserted in Decision 2008/855/EC:

‘Article 8b

Measures relating to live feral pigs, fresh meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat from feral pigs

1.   The Member States concerned with areas listed in the Annex shall ensure that:

| (a) | no live feral pigs from the areas listed in the Annex are dispatched to other Member States or to other areas in the territory of the same Member State; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

no live feral pigs from the areas listed in the Annex are dispatched to other Member States or to other areas in the territory of the same Member State;

| (b) | no consignments of fresh meat of feral pigs, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat from the areas listed in the Annex are dispatched to other Member States or to other areas in the territory of the same Member State. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

no consignments of fresh meat of feral pigs, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat from the areas listed in the Annex are dispatched to other Member States or to other areas in the territory of the same Member State.

2.   By way of derogation from paragraph 1(b), the Member States concerned with areas listed in Parts I and II of the Annex may authorise the dispatch of consignments of fresh meat of feral pigs, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat from those areas to other areas not listed in the Annex, provided that:

| (a) | the pigs have been tested with negative results for classical swine fever according to any of the diagnostic procedures described in Part A(1), Part B or Part C of Chapter VI of the Annex to Decision 2002/106/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the pigs have been tested with negative results for classical swine fever according to any of the diagnostic procedures described in Part A(1), Part B or Part C of Chapter VI of the Annex to Decision 2002/106/EC;

| (b) | the competent authority of the place of destination gives its prior approval.’ |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the competent authority of the place of destination gives its prior approval.’

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 June 2010.

For the Commission

John DALLI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 302, 13.11.2008, p. 19.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 39, 9.2.2002, p. 71.

4

---

| 26.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/30

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 25 June 2010

concerning the non-inclusion of trifluralin in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC

(notified under document C(2010) 4199)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2010/355/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1), and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Commission Decision 2007/629/EC (2) it was decided not to include the active substance trifluralin in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. That Decision was taken within the framework of the second stage of the programme of work provided for in Commission Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 (3) and (EC) No 703/2001 (4) which lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and which establish a list of active substances to be assessed, with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Commission Decision 2007/629/EC (2) it was decided not to include the active substance trifluralin in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. That Decision was taken within the framework of the second stage of the programme of work provided for in Commission Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 (3) and (EC) No 703/2001 (4) which lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and which establish a list of active substances to be assessed, with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.

| (2) | The original notifier submitted a new application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I (5). It requested the application of the accelerated procedure pursuant to Articles 13 to 19 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and submitted an updated dossier. The application was submitted to Greece, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 451/2000. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The original notifier submitted a new application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I (5). It requested the application of the accelerated procedure pursuant to Articles 13 to 19 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and submitted an updated dossier. The application was submitted to Greece, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 451/2000.

| (3) | That application complies with the substantive and procedural requirements of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and was submitted within the time period provided for in the second sentence of Article 13 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

That application complies with the substantive and procedural requirements of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and was submitted within the time period provided for in the second sentence of Article 13 of that Regulation.

| (4) | Greece evaluated the new information and data submitted by the notifier and prepared an additional report on 7 January 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Greece evaluated the new information and data submitted by the notifier and prepared an additional report on 7 January 2009.

| (5) | The additional report was peer reviewed by the Member States and the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter EFSA, and presented to the Commission on 14 July 2009 in the format of the EFSA Scientific Report for trifluralin (6). This report was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 11 May 2010 in the format of the Commission review report for trifluralin. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The additional report was peer reviewed by the Member States and the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter EFSA, and presented to the Commission on 14 July 2009 in the format of the EFSA Scientific Report for trifluralin (6). This report was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 11 May 2010 in the format of the Commission review report for trifluralin.

| (6) | The new assessment by the rapporteur Member State and the new conclusion by the EFSA concentrated on the concerns that lead to the non-inclusion, which were due to the high risk for aquatic organisms, especially fish, the toxicity of metabolites to sediment dwelling organisms, the consumer exposure for non-cereal applications, the high persistence in soil, the high potential for bioaccumulation, and the potential for long range transport via air. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The new assessment by the rapporteur Member State and the new conclusion by the EFSA concentrated on the concerns that lead to the non-inclusion, which were due to the high risk for aquatic organisms, especially fish, the toxicity of metabolites to sediment dwelling organisms, the consumer exposure for non-cereal applications, the high persistence in soil, the high potential for bioaccumulation, and the potential for long range transport via air.

| (7) | New data and information were submitted by the notifier in the updated dossier, in particular as regards the aquatic risk assessment, especially fish, the toxicity of metabolites to sediment dwelling organisms, the high persistence in soil and the high potential for bioaccumulation. In order to reduce the risk to consumers, the notifier, in the context of the resubmission, only supported applications on oil seed rape. As regards the potential for long range transport via air, the submitted data simply reproduced a monitoring report which already figured in the original dossier. A new assessment was performed, as included in the additional report and in the EFSA Scientific Report for trifluralin. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

New data and information were submitted by the notifier in the updated dossier, in particular as regards the aquatic risk assessment, especially fish, the toxicity of metabolites to sediment dwelling organisms, the high persistence in soil and the high potential for bioaccumulation. In order to reduce the risk to consumers, the notifier, in the context of the resubmission, only supported applications on oil seed rape. As regards the potential for long range transport via air, the submitted data simply reproduced a monitoring report which already figured in the original dossier. A new assessment was performed, as included in the additional report and in the EFSA Scientific Report for trifluralin.

| (8) | However, the additional data and information provided by the notifier did not permit to eliminate all the specific concerns that led to the non-inclusion. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

However, the additional data and information provided by the notifier did not permit to eliminate all the specific concerns that led to the non-inclusion.

| (9) | In particular, the concern on potential high risk for aquatic organisms, especially fish, could not be solved due to shortcomings in the newly submitted studies. As a consequence, the surface water risk assessment could not be finalised. Furthermore, the potential for long range transport via air has not been adequately elucidated by the produced information which was of an obsolete nature. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

In particular, the concern on potential high risk for aquatic organisms, especially fish, could not be solved due to shortcomings in the newly submitted studies. As a consequence, the surface water risk assessment could not be finalised. Furthermore, the potential for long range transport via air has not been adequately elucidated by the produced information which was of an obsolete nature.

| (10) | The Commission invited the notifier to submit its comments on the results of the peer review. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 21(1) to Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, the Commission invited the notifier to submit comments on the draft review report and in particular on the remaining concerns for the aquatic risk and the potential for long range transport. The notifier submitted its comments, which have been carefully examined. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The Commission invited the notifier to submit its comments on the results of the peer review. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 21(1) to Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, the Commission invited the notifier to submit comments on the draft review report and in particular on the remaining concerns for the aquatic risk and the potential for long range transport. The notifier submitted its comments, which have been carefully examined.

| (11) | However, despite the arguments put forward by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing trifluralin satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

However, despite the arguments put forward by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing trifluralin satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.

| (12) | Trifluralin should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

Trifluralin should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.

| (13) | Decision 2007/629/EC should be repealed. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

Decision 2007/629/EC should be repealed.

| (14) | This Decision does not prejudice the submission of a further application for trifluralin pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

This Decision does not prejudice the submission of a further application for trifluralin pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.

| (15) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(15)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Trifluralin shall not be included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.

Article 2

Decision 2007/629/EC is repealed.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 June 2010.

For the Commission

John DALLI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 255, 29.9.2007, p. 42.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 55, 29.2.2000, p. 25.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 98, 7.4.2001, p. 6.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 15, 18.1.2008, p. 5.

5

(6)  EFSA Scientific Report (2009) 327 — Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance trifluralin (re-issued on 14 July 2009).

6

---

| 26.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/32

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 25 June 2010

allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substance profoxydim

(notified under document C(2010) 4225)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2010/356/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1), and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in March 1998 Spain received an application from BASF SE for the inclusion of the active substance profoxydim in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 1999/43/EC (2) confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in March 1998 Spain received an application from BASF SE for the inclusion of the active substance profoxydim in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 1999/43/EC (2) confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.

| (2) | Confirmation of the completeness of the dossier was necessary in order to allow it to be examined in detail and to allow Member States the possibility of granting provisional authorisations, for periods of up to 3 years, for plant protection products containing the active substance concerned, while complying with the conditions laid down in Article 8(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC and, in particular, the condition relating to the detailed assessment of the active substance and the plant protection products in the light of the requirements laid down by that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Confirmation of the completeness of the dossier was necessary in order to allow it to be examined in detail and to allow Member States the possibility of granting provisional authorisations, for periods of up to 3 years, for plant protection products containing the active substance concerned, while complying with the conditions laid down in Article 8(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC and, in particular, the condition relating to the detailed assessment of the active substance and the plant protection products in the light of the requirements laid down by that Directive.

| (3) | For this active substance, the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, for the uses proposed by the applicant. The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 28 March 2001. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

For this active substance, the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, for the uses proposed by the applicant. The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 28 March 2001.

| (4) | Following submission of the draft assessment report by the rapporteur Member State, it has been found to be necessary to request further information from the applicant and to have the rapporteur Member State examine that information and submit its assessment. Therefore, the examination of the dossier is still ongoing and it will not be possible to complete the evaluation within the timeframe provided for in Directive 91/414/EEC, read in conjunction with Commission Decision 2008/564/EC (3). |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Following submission of the draft assessment report by the rapporteur Member State, it has been found to be necessary to request further information from the applicant and to have the rapporteur Member State examine that information and submit its assessment. Therefore, the examination of the dossier is still ongoing and it will not be possible to complete the evaluation within the timeframe provided for in Directive 91/414/EEC, read in conjunction with Commission Decision 2008/564/EC (3).

| (5) | As the evaluation so far has not identified any reason for immediate concern, Member States should be given the possibility of prolonging provisional authorisations granted for plant protection products containing the active substance concerned for a period of 24 months in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC so as to enable the examination of the dossier to continue. It is expected that the evaluation and decision-making process with respect to a decision on a possible inclusion in Annex I to that Directive for profoxydim will have been completed within 24 months. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

As the evaluation so far has not identified any reason for immediate concern, Member States should be given the possibility of prolonging provisional authorisations granted for plant protection products containing the active substance concerned for a period of 24 months in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC so as to enable the examination of the dossier to continue. It is expected that the evaluation and decision-making process with respect to a decision on a possible inclusion in Annex I to that Directive for profoxydim will have been completed within 24 months.

| (6) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Member States may extend provisional authorisations for plant protection products containing profoxydim for a period ending on 30 June 2012 at the latest.

Article 2

This Decision shall expire on 30 June 2012.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 June 2010.

For the Commission

John DALLI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 14, 19.1.1999, p. 30.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 181, 10.7.2008, p. 47.

3

---