alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Simon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property
Analysts Master Limited Partnership ("NPAMLP");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2005

By: EBL&S Property Management Inc.,
    Agent for NPAMLP


By: /s/ David A. Simon
    ---------------------------------
Name: David A. Simon
Title: Vice President and
       Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 10(j)


                                                    [LOGO]
                                                    KeyBank
                                                    Mailcode: OH-01-27-0606
                                                    127 Public Square
                                                    Cleveland, OH  44114-1306



September 24, 1996



Ms. Alayne L. Reitman
Vice President-Finance and CFO
The Tranzonic Companies
30195 Chagrin Blvd.
Pepper Pike, Ohio  44124

Re:     Extension of Commitment Period under Credit Agreement, dated as of 
        October 7, 1993 (the "Credit Agreement"), by and among The Tranzonic 
        Companies (the "Borrower") the Banks which are parties thereto and 
        KeyBank National Association as Agent for the Banks.
        --------------------------------------------------------------------

Reference is hereby made to the Credit Agreement, which provides for, among
other things, Revolving Credit Loans aggregating $30,000,000, such Revolving
Credit Loans available to the Borrower, upon certain terms and conditions and
as limited by the Credit Agreement, on a revolving credit basis until June 30,
1997, (the last day of the "Commitment Period" now in effect).

We are in receipt of the letter dated June 13, 1996 from the Borrower
requesting that the Credit Agreement be amended by deleting from the definition
of "COMMITMENT PERIOD" the date "June 30, 1997" and substituting for the
deleted date "June 30, 1999".

Please be advised that KeyBank hereby consents to the extension of the Credit
Agreement as set forth above.  In all other respects the Credit Agreement shall
remain in full effect.


Sincerely,

KeyBank

By:       /s/ Matthew P. Tuohey
      --------------------------

Its:  Assistant Vice President
      --------------------------
# L_2007079EN.01004101.xml

| 20.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 79/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 79/41

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 of 27 June 2005 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 169 of 30 June 2005
  )

Official Journal of the European Union L 169 of 30 June 2005

On Page 19, in Annex II, in the ‘List of products included in the arrangements referred to in Article 1(2) (a) and (b)’:

for:

| ‘0208 | Other meat and edible meat offal, fresh, chilled or frozen: (1) | S |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0208 10 | Of rabbits or hares | S |
| 0208 20 00 | Frogs' legs | NS |
| 0208 30 00 | Of primates | S |
| 0208 40 00 | Of whales, dolphins and porpoises (mammals of the order Cetacea); of manatees and dugongs (mammals of the order Sirenia) | S |
| 0208 50 | Of reptiles (including snakes and turtles) | S |
| ex 0208 90 | Other, excluding products of 0208 90 55 | S |

‘0208

Other meat and edible meat offal, fresh, chilled or frozen: (1)

S

0208 10

Of rabbits or hares

S

0208 20 00

Frogs' legs

NS

0208 30 00

Of primates

S

0208 40 00

Of whales, dolphins and porpoises (mammals of the order Cetacea); of manatees and dugongs (mammals of the order Sirenia)

S

0208 50

Of reptiles (including snakes and turtles)

S

ex 0208 90

Other, excluding products of 0208 90 55

S

read:

| ‘ex 0208 | Other meat and edible meat offal, fresh, chilled or frozen, excluding products of 0208 90 55 (2) (except 0208 20 00 for which the footnote does not apply) | S |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0208 20 00 | Frogs' legs | NS |

‘ex 0208

Other meat and edible meat offal, fresh, chilled or frozen, excluding products of 0208 90 55 (2) (except 0208 20 00 for which the footnote does not apply)

S

0208 20 00

Frogs' legs

NS

---

(1)  For these products, the arrangement referred to in Section 1 of Chapter II does not apply.’,

1

(2)  For these products, the arrangement referred to in Section 1 of Chapter II does not apply.’

2

---
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 22 June 2005         

on the measure implemented by Italy for professional sports clubs (Decreto Salva Calcio)

(notified under document number C(2005) 1794)

(Only the Italian version is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/898/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 88(2) thereof,

Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision cited above (1) and having regard to their comments,

Whereas:

I.   PROCEDURE

II.   DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE

III.   ASSESSMENT OF THE MEASURE

IV.   CONCLUSION

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The measure which Italy has implemented for professional sports clubs by way of Law No 27 of 21 February 2003, as amended by Law No 62 of 18 April 2005, does not constitute state aid.

Article 2

This decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.

Done at Brussels, 22 June 2005            

For the Commission

Neelie KROES            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ C 308, 18.12.2003, p. 9.

(2)  See footnote 1.

(3)  Published in Official Gazette No 96 of 27 April 2005 (Supplemento ordinario n. 76).

(4)  That is, beyond the normal five-year period for carrying forward losses.

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 1 7 , 2024

No. 04

- 22

- 00669

- CR

Arnoldo A. ALMEIDA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR7294

Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl , Judge Presiding

ORDER

Court

- appointed counsel filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Because there is an arguable ground for appeal, we GRANT Vincent D. Callahan’s motion to withdraw.

We WITHDRAW our May 3 , 2023 submission date, ABATE this appeal, and REMAND

the cause.

We ORDER the trial court to (1) appoint a different attorney to represent Appellant on appeal and (2) notify this court of the appointment by March 2, 2024

.

If Appellant wishes to prosecute this appeal, new appellate counsel must file a brief that addresses the issue we have identified and any other arguable grounds for appeal.

Appellant’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS after the trial court’s order appoints new counsel.

It is so ORDERED on January 17, 2024

.

___________________ __________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice04

- 22

- 00669

- CR

- 2

- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of January, 2024

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 576 

Calling on Congress, schools, and State and local educational agencies to 

recognize the significant educational implications of dyslexia that must 

be addressed and designating October 2016 as ‘‘National Dyslexia Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. MURPHY, and Ms. WARREN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Calling on Congress, schools, and State and local educational 

agencies to recognize the significant educational implications of dyslexia that must be addressed and designating 

October 2016 as ‘‘National Dyslexia Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas dyslexia is— 

(1) defined as an unexpected difficulty in reading for 

an individual who has the intelligence to be a much better reader; and 

(2) most commonly due to a difficulty in phonological processing (the appreciation of the individual 

sounds of spoken language), which affects the ability of 

an individual to speak, read, spell, and often, learn a second language; 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 576 ATS 

Whereas dyslexia is the most common learning disability and 

affects 80 percent to 90 percent of all individuals with a 

learning disability; 

Whereas dyslexia is highly prevalent, affecting as many as 1 

out of 5 individuals, and persistent; 

Whereas dyslexia is a paradox such that an individual with 

dyslexia may have— 

(1) weaknesses in decoding that results in difficulties in accurate or fluent word recognition; and 

(2) strengths in higher-level cognitive functions, such 

as reasoning, critical thinking, concept formation, or 

problem solving; 

Whereas great progress has been made in understanding dyslexia on a scientific level, including the epidemiology and 

cognitive and neurobiological bases of dyslexia; and 

Whereas early diagnosis of dyslexia is critical for ensuring 

that individuals with dyslexia receive focused, evidencebased intervention that leads to the promotion of selfawareness and self-empowerment and the provision of 

necessary accommodations so as to ensure school and life 

success: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) calls on Congress, schools, and State and 

3 local educational agencies to recognize that dyslexia 

4 has significant educational implications that must be 

5 addressed; and 

6 (2) designates October 2016 as ‘‘National Dys7 lexia Awareness Month’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Будь-хто може стати жертвою торгівлі людьми. 

Якщо Вас спонукають, вербують або перевозять для роботи, надання послуг 

або комерційного сексу із застосуванням сили, шахрайства або примусу, це 

є торгівлею людьми.

Жертви торгівлі людьми: нелегальні працівники, тимчасові іноземні 

працівники, споживачі психоактивних речовин, особи з психічними 

розладами, безпритульні або молоді люди, які втекли з дому, а також 

особи, які перебувають у скрутному економічному становищі. 

Ознаки торгівлі людьми :

• застосування сили, шахрайства, обіцянок або психологічного контролю

• примушують працювати понаднормово або виконувати небезпечну 

роботу

• платять мало або взагалі не платять, затримують зарплату

• можуть погрожувати Вам або Вашим близьким

• контролює Вашу мобільність, житло, доступ до грошей або те, 

з ким Ви можете спілкуватися, а також

• приховують від вас ваше посвідчення особи або паспорт.

Торгівля людьми найчастіше трапляється в сільському господарстві, на 

фермах, будівництві, у сфері вилову морепродуктів, озеленення, в готелях, 

ресторанах і в якості домашньої прислуги.

Якщо ви або хтось, кого ви знаєте, опинилися в ситуації, коли є 

підозра, що ви стали жертвою торгівлі людьми, зателефонуйте 911. 

Ви або хтось, кому ви довіряєте, також можете зателефонувати на Національну 

гарячу лінію з протидії торгівлі людьми за номером 1-888-373-7888; написати 

“BeFree” (233733); або в чат humantraffickinghotline.org.

ВИЯВЛЕННЯ ТА ПОВІДОМЛЕННЯ ПРО 

osha.gov/workers

OSHA 4349-08 2023 | Ukrainian

ТОРГІВЛЮ

ЛЮДЬМИ

Управління з охорони 

праці Міністерства 

праці США
Fl) (Ar RIPL

- • ;

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0042

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

AUTREE ANIEL PEDERSEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

,ED

MM 1 1 2021

Bovven Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Autree Aniel Pedersen appeals his Cascade County conviction of and sentence for

Sexual Intercourse Without Consent (SIWC). Pedersen raises three issues on appeal.

Pedersen argues in part that the District Court erred by denying his motion to substitute the

assigned district judge for the stated reason that the public defender's substitution motion

was "ineffective due to late payment of the substitution fee. After Pedersen was found

guilty by a jury, the court sentenced him to 100 years of imprisonment with no time

suspended, restrictions on parole eligibility, and a level 3 sexual offender designation.

Pedersen argues that the court improperly imposed an enhanced sentence under

§ 45-5-503(3)(b), MCA (2015). The judge who imposed the sentence has since retired.

The parties, by and through their counsel of record, now stipulate that Pedersen is

entitled to have his sentence vacated. Without agreeing on the underlying merits of

Pedersen's claims, the parties agree the case should be remanded for Pedersen to be

resentenced under § 45-5-503(2), MCA (2015). The parties also agree the resentencing

hearing should occur before a new sentencing judge with an updated presentence

investigation report. The parties have agreed to this resolution and seek dismissal of the

remaining issues Pedersen raises on appeal.

Having reviewed the parties' Motion to Dismiss by Stipulation, and good cause

appearing,

05/11/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0042
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Cascade County Cause No. ADC-17-417 is

remanded to the Eighth Judicial District Court, with instructions to vacate the

November 21, 2019 sentencing order. The District Court is directed to designate a new

judge to hold a new sentencing hearing with an updated Presentence Investigation Report

and to sentence Pedersen pursuant to § 45-5-503(2), MCA (2015).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of Pedersen's appeal is dismissed

with prejudice.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to the

Judges and the Clerk of the District Court for the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County.

Dated this I I 1-;ayof May, 2021.

Chief Justice

Justices
<TABLE>

                             ACCESS CORPORATION
             SCHEDULE II- Valuation and Qualifiying Accounts
<CAPTION>

<S>                   <C>           <C>           <C>         <C>
Column A              Column B      Column C      Column D    Column E
                      Balance       Charged to    Charged to  Balance
                      Beginning     Costs and     Other       End of
Description           of Period     Expenses      Accounts    Period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended
April 30, 1998

Deferred Income
Tax Benefit
Valuation
Allowance           ($2,949,018)                  163,300      ($3,112,318)

Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts       $12,000                   ($6,438)         $18,438
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended
April 30, 1997

Deferred Income
Tax Benefit
Valuation
Allowance           ($2,539,700)       ($3,182)   $412,500      ($2,949,018)
 
Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts      $189,685   (1) ($12,000)   $189,685           $12,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 
April 30, 1996

Deferred Income
Tax Benefit
Valuation
Allowance            ($2,539,700)       $0          $0           ($2,539,700)

Allowance for 
Doubtful Accounts        $18,100  (1) ($39,000)(2) ($132,585)       $189,685


<FN>

(1)  Net change in reserve.

(2)  Net increase as a result of acquisition in FY 96

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10807]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             GENERAL LEAVE

  Ms. DeGETTE. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and 
include extraneous material on the bill just passed by the House.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentlewoman from Colorado?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         228,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     83,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               638,760
<PP&E>                                      11,901,206
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,030,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,517,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,849,025
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,989
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,638,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,517,978
<SALES>                                        537,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,513,719
<CGS>                                          236,162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,948,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                524,148
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            524,148
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   524,148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley D. Tilden, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|   |  |                        
|-- |  | -----------------------
|By |  | /s/ Bradley D. Tilden  
|   |  | Bradley D. Tilden      
|   |  | Chief Financial Officer
|   |  | March 5, 2007
#### R. H. LANE v. D. W. MORTON.

*Praetiee*— Aetion *under Landlord and Tenant Aet*— Appeal *from Justice’s Court--Answer of Defendant.*

In an action under the Landlord and Tenant Act, begun before a Justice of the Peace, and carried by appeal to the Superior Court, it was not error in the Court to allow the defendant to file an answer claiming title in himself, and raising the question of the jurisdiction of the Justice’s Court, although a motion to file such answer had been denied by the Justice.

*{Hinton*v. *Deans,*75 N. C. 18 ; *Heyer*v. *Beatty,*76 N. C. 28, cited and approved.)

Civil ActioN tried at Fall Term, 1877, of Pamlico Superior Court, before *JTure, J.*

This action was commenced before a Justice of the Peace, under the Landlord and Tenant Act, to recover possession of real estate. ' The defendant claimed title in himself to the premises, and at the hearing in July, 1877, asked leave to file his answer in writing, raising the question of jurisdiction. The Justice refused the motion and gave judgment for the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendant asked leave to be allowed to file the same answer which he had offered before the Justice. Iiis Honor allowed'the motion and from that order the plaintiff appealed.

No counsel for plaintiff.

*Messrs. W. J. Clarice § Son,*for defendant.

Faircloth, J.

(After stating the facts as above.) The only-question is, did the Judge have the power to allow the answer to be filed. In *Hinton*v. *Deans,*75 N. C. 18, the defendant applied to His Honor to be allowed to add the plea of the statute of limitations, and we decided that it was discretionary and not a matter of right in the defen*8dant. In *Heyer*v. Beatty, 76 N. C. 28, we held that the defendant ought to be allowed -to amend his answer and make it what he intended it to be before the Justice, and that decision governs the present case, which involves the same question.

No error.

Per Curiam. Judgment-affirmed.