alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 10.17


                     AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 2 (this "Amendment") to Amendment No.1 ("Amendment No. 1") to
the Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") dated as of March 1, 1999
by and between Michael Gorin (the "Executive") and Aeroflex Incorporated (the
"Company"), hereby amends Amendment No. 1, effective as of August 13, 2001, as
set forth below.

                 1. Paragraph 2 of Amendment No. 1 is hereby amended to read in
its entirety as follows:

                    "The Company shall credit each Deferred Amount to a
                    bookkeeping account in the name of the Executive (the
                    "Account") on the date the Deferred Amount would (absent
                    this Amendment) have been paid to the Executive. The Company
                    shall permit the Executive to file an Investment
                    Designation, as defined in Section 1.2 of the Company's Key
                    Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), and shall
                    credit to the Account earnings in accordance with such
                    Investment Designation and in accordance with and subject to
                    the terms and conditions of Section 2.2 of the Plan. The
                    Account shall be reduced as and to the extent distributions
                    are made from the Account pursuant to Sections 4, 6 and 7 of
                    Amendment No. 1."

                 2. Paragraph 7 of Amendment No. 1 is hereby amended to read in
its entirety as follows:

                    "Notwithstanding any other provision of Amendment No. 1, if
                    the Committee determines that it is possible for the Company
                    to pay the Executive all or any portion of the amounts
                    credited to his Account at a time when he is still employed
                    with the Company or any of its affiliates, without the
                    amount so paid being nondeductible by reason of Section
                    162(m), then subject to the approval of the Committee in its
                    sole and complete discretion, such amount may be paid to the
                    Executive."

                 3. Except as specifically provided in this Amendment, the
Employment Agreement and Amendment No. 1 are in all other respects ratified and
confirmed without amendment.

                 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their
hands as of the date first above written.




<PAGE>



                                AEROFLEX INCORPORATED


                                By: /s/ Leonard Borow
                                   ----------------------------
                                Name:  Leonard Borow
                                Title: Executive Vice-President


                                /s/ Michael Gorin
                                -------------------------------
                                Michael Gorin


                                        2
Exhibit
10.3(a)


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


To That


AMENDED AND RESTATED


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


Of


CHARLES P. McDONALD


 


This First Amendment (the “First
Amendment”) to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective
as of January 1, 2009 by and between Global Aviation Holdings Inc.
(formerly Global Aero Logistics Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
and Charles P. McDonald (the “Executive”), is made and entered into as of this
16th day of September 2010 (Global and Executive hereinafter collectively
the “Parties”).


 


WHEREAS, Executive and
Company entered into that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
effective as of January 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”) which sets forth the
terms and conditions for Executive’s continued employment; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
hereto desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing recital and of the mutual covenants set forth
herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.             Article 5.1, “Annual Base Salary,” is hereby
amended, effective as of November 1, 2010, to increase the Executive’s
Base Salary from $400,000 to $425,000.


 


2.             Continuing Effect. 
Except as otherwise amended hereby, all terms and conditions set forth
in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are incorporated by
reference herein.  Capitalized terms used
but not defined herein shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties
hereto have executed this First Amendment effective as of the month, day and
year set forth above.


 


	
  GLOBAL AVIATION HOLDINGS INC.

  	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Mark M. McMillin

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Charles P. McDonald

  
	
   

  	
  Mark M. McMillin

  	
   

  	
  Charles
  P. McDonald
#### JOHN J. HASTY v. G. C. FUNDERBURK and others.

Appeal— *Costs.*

An appeal will be dismissed where it satisfactorily appears that the question of costs is the only matter involved.

*(State*v. *Railroad,*74 N. C., 287, and oases cited, approved).

MOTION by defendant to dismiss the appeal, heard at October Term, ,1883, óf The Supreme Court.

*Messrs. Haywood & Haywood,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Payne & Vann,*for defendants.

Merrimon, J.

It is suggested, and made *to*appear to the satisfaction of the court, that the matter involved in this action has been settled by the parties thereto, and that it is unnecessary to decide the question of law presented by the exceptions speci*94fied in the record. It further appears that the defendant, the appellee, has notified the appellant that he would move at the present term of the court to dismiss the appeal when the case should be called in its order foUargument. Accordingly the motion to dismiss the appeal has been entered, and the appellant fails to appear and prosecute his appeal or oppose the motion to dismiss.

This court has repeatedly held, that when it appears that the matter in litigation in the action before it has been settled by the parties, or is disposed of in some other way, and it has thus become unnecessary to decide the questions presented by the appeal, it will not proceed to consider and decide them, but will dismiss the appeal. Courts are eminently practical tribunals. It is not their province, and it ought not to be their desire, to decide questions or causes unnecessarily. *State*v. *Railroad,*74 N. C., *287; Martin*v. *Sloan,*69 N. C., 128; *Kidd*v. *Morrison,*Phil. Eq., 31.

In such cases, if the parties agree to dismiss the appeal, it may be done simply on motion; when they do not so agree, it is competent for the appellee, after reasonable notice of his proposed motion to appellant, to move to dismiss the appeal and to support the same by proof satisfactory to the court by affidavit or otherwise, as the court may direct, and the motion in a proper case will be granted.

The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case is allowed. Let an order to that effect be entered.

Per CuriaM. Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingJune 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. AltonWingate, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Harry L. Stephens, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and
(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
 
	 	 	 
Date: August 10, 2004     BY: /S/ J. Alton Wingate                    J. Alton Wingate                    President and Chief Executive                    Officer      
Date: August 10, 2004     BY: /S/ Harry L. Stephens                    Harry L. Stephens                    Executive Vice-President              and Chief Financial Officer |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 13.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Embratel Participações S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers
knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2004 of the Company, as amended by this amendment, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F, as amended by this amendment, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 16, 2006



/s/ Carlos Henrique
MoreiraName:

Carlos Henrique MoreiraTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




Date: March 16, 2006



/s/ Isaac
BerensztejnName:

Isaac BerensztejnTitle:

Chief Financial Officer & Investor Relations Officer
## FE91000 THU 

# 9 10 AM 

### PENOBSC3T INDIAH 

### NAT1ON FAY 

## NO 207 827 1137 

## I 2

szots delit

VP4 OPCIE



### February 

# 4 2000 UNITED 

## STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEOT1ON AGENCY REGION 

## CONORESS STREET SUITE 1100 

## BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS 021142023



### Richard Hamilton Chief 

### Penobscot Indian Nation 6 

### River Road Indian Island Reservation 

### Old

# Town 

# ME 04468 Dear ChiefHamilton This letter is to 

### acknowledge receipt of

### your letter dated 

### December 

# 9 1999 addressed to 

### Ronald Manfredonia concerning your request that the

# US Environmental Protection 

### Agency promulgate water quality standards 

### and administer related 

### Clean Water Act programs for the 

### Penobscot Nations reservation 

### This request raises the question 

### whether under the 

### Clean Water Act

# CWA and the 

### Maine Indian 

### Claims Settlement 

### Act 

## 7vIICSA 

# EPA may retain authority to 

### promulgate federal water quality standards 

### on behalf ofIndian tribes in Indian country in

## Maine 

# Asyou 

## may

# know your request implicates 

## manyofthe 

### same issues as the application 

### from the State of

### Maine for authorization to administer the National Pollution Discharge Elimination 

### System

# NPDES permitting 

### program under the

# CWA in 

### Maine including Indian country within the State 

# W8 are currently considering these issues with reference to the 

### Maine application 

# We
are consulting closely with the 

### Department of Interior

### and are in the midst 

### of consultation 

### with the 

### Maine tribes including the 

### Penobscot Nation 

# We will fully consider 

### your request that 

## we promulgate water quality standards for

### your reservation 

### and administer related 

### Clean Water Act programs within your reservation Please contact 113 if 

### you would like

# EPA to treat your 

## December

# 9 1999 letter as a

## comment on the record for

## Maines

# NPDES program application 

# When we have made a determination as to

# MICSAs effect 

### on 

# EPAs authority to 

### promulgate water quality standards in 

### Maine Indian 

### country 

## we will continue to consult with 

## you as appropriate to decide acourse ofaction concerning the applicable water quality standards in 

### your reservation 

### Sincerely

1 

# AL614 7 Linda 

## Murphy Director Office 

### ofEcosystems Protection


## cc John 

## Banks Natural 

### Resources Director

# PIN Kathy Gorospe American Indian 

### Environmental Office 

# EPA

Tot Frov 11398372734 intomol Addrots 

### JAL Illiporwwopegovirosplonl RscycleiVRecielabli PrtnIso Wirt

# Veg bla ON abaci Mks ROCyCIO Paper

## woman30 Pootooneumt6 

# PN000140
U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Company Name Change

Dear Sir or Madam:

Midstream Integrity Services, LLC (henceforth referred to as “MIS”) hereby petitions the Secretary

of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") to change the company name on the 

petition granted to MIS (Exemption No. 11554, FAA Docket No. FAA-2015-0377) as well as the 

COA granted to MIS (FAA-2015-0377-333E) to “USDataWing Aerial Analytics, LLC.”

Company name change

MIS is changing its company name to USDataWing Aerial Analytics, LLC. We request that all 

authorizations previously granted to MIS be transferred to USDataWing Aerial Analytics, LLC via a 

memorandum for record or reissuance of the aforementioned exemption documents, whichever the 

Secretary determines to be appropriate. 

Respectfully submitted,

Landon Phillips

Program Manager, Unmanned Aerial Systems

Midstream Integrity Services / USDataWing Aerial Analytics, LLC
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 41 

Congratulating the North Dakota State University football team for winning 

the 2014 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football 

Championship Subdivision title. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2015 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself and Ms. HEITKAMP) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the North Dakota State University football 

team for winning the 2014 National Collegiate Athletic 

Association Division I Football Championship Subdivision title. 

Whereas the North Dakota State University (referred to in 

this preamble as ‘‘NDSU’’) Bison won the 2014 National 

Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘NCAA’’) Division I Football Championship 

Subdivision title game in Frisco, Texas, on January 10, 

2015, in a hard-fought victory over the Illinois State 

Redbirds by a score of 29 to 27; 

Whereas NDSU has won 12 NCAA Football Championships; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 41 ATS 

Whereas NDSU has now won 4 consecutive NCAA Football 

Championships since 2011, an unprecedented achievement in Football Championship Subdivision history; 

Whereas the NDSU Bison have displayed tremendous resilience and skill over the past 4 seasons, with 58 wins to 

only 3 losses, including a streak of 33 consecutive winning games; 

Whereas an estimated 17,000 Bison fans attended the Championship game, reflecting the tremendous spirit and dedication of Bison Nation that has helped propel the success 

of the team; and 

Whereas the 2014 NCAA Division I Football Championship 

Subdivision title was a victory not only for the NDSU 

football team, but also for the entire State of North Dakota: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the North Dakota State Uni3 versity football team as the 2014 champion of the 

4 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I 

5 Football Championship Subdivision; 

6 (2) commends the North Dakota State Univer7 sity players, coaches, and staff for their hard work 

8 and dedication; and 

9 (3) recognizes the students, alumni, and loyal 

10 fans that supported the Bison in their successful 

11 quest to capture another Division I trophy for North 

12 Dakota State University. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 7, 2016

s1130 

# Order

Clerk December 7, 2016

153697

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153697

COA: 324963

Van Buren CC: 14

- 019392

- FC

JOSE L. GARCIA

- MANDUJANO,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT t he Van Buren County

Prosecuting Attorney to file a supplemental response to the application for leave to

appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall specifically

address : (1) whether the defendant was denied effective assista nce of counsel where his

trial attorney failed to impeach the testimony of the physician’s assistant, that she used an

adult speculum on the complainant, with the witness’s report, which contain ed no

reference to the speculum; and (2) whether the defendant was prejudiced by trial

counsel’s failure to use the physician assistant’s report when cross

- examining the

witness.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         193,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               53,520,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,125,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            78,749,000
<PP&E>                                      10,246,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,164,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              85,325,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,636,000
<BONDS>                                      9,286,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,490,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,028,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,758,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                85,325,000
<SALES>                                    271,131,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           271,131,000
<CGS>                                      210,851,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              210,851,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            53,451,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,906,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,923,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,050,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,873,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,873,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.80


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 88849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26033]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20711 and #20712; GEORGIA Disaster Number GA-
20013]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Georgia

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 8.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4830-DR), dated September 
30, 2024.
    Incident: Hurricane Helene.

DATES: Issued on November 4, 2024.
    Incident Period: September 24, 2024 through October 30, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: November 29, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 30, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Georgia, dated September 30, 2024, is 
hereby amended to update the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning September 24, 2024 and continuing through October 30, 2024.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-26033 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
EXHIBIT 23.1 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**

**PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

**Board of Directors and Shareholders**

**CECO Environmental Corp.**

**Cincinnati, Ohio**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-130294 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-33270 and 333-143527 on Forms S-8 of our reports dated March 13, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of CECO Environmental Corp., which appear in this Form 10-K. Our report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness ofthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 16, 2009
Exhibit 10a  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR


To the Board of Management of Akzo Nobel N.V.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 033-36808, 333-06194 and 333-13280) of Akzo Nobel N.V. of our
report dated February 10, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Akzo Nobel N.V.and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
related consolidated statements of income, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 Annual Report
on Form 20-F of Akzo Nobel N.V.







18 April, 2003

Arnhem, the Netherlands                     KPMG Accountants N.V.