# T echnical S upport D ocument

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of California; Sacramento Metro Area; Attainment Plan for 1997 8

- Hour Ozone Standard



# Additional Supporting Information
and Analys i s of Select Issues
in the Notice of P roposed Rulemaking

John Ungvarsky
USEPA, Region 9 September 24 , 2014

### 1



### Table of Contents

I. Adopted Measures and Evaluation of Whether Reductions Were Credited in 2018 Inventory Baseline Used in 2013 Sacramento Plan Update

.

II. EPA Adjustments to 20 08 and 2011 Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) Milestone Demonstrations in 2006 and 2009 State Submittals

.

III. EPA Adjustments to Attainment Demonstration and RFP

.

IV. Compilation of Measures Adopted by Sacramento Metro Ozone Nonattainment Area
Districts

V. Califor nia Air Resources Board Rules and Measures 1990

- 2013

VI. Air Quality Modeling

VII. Post

- 2018 Contingency Measure

VIII. Status of Reasonable Available Control Technology State Implementation Plan Submittals

### 2



## I. Adopted District/State Measures and Evaluation of Whe ther Reductions Were Credited in 2018 Inventory Baseline in Tables C1 and C2 1 

## in the 2013 Sacramento Plan Update

M easures evaluated :

 Table I

- 1. Defined and adopted commitment measures in the Sacramento Regional 8

- Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Pr ogress Plan that have been submitted to EPA. Reductions from measures in the SIP are eligible for credit towards attainment.

 Table I

- 2. Other adopted measures in the Sacramento federal ozone nonattainment area that achieve emissions reductions greater th an 0.1 tpd, are not commitments, and have not yet been submitted to EPA.

 Table I

- 3. Adopted CARB measures not yet approved by EPA (e.g., not in the SIP) but credited in C1 and C2.

In terms of districts’ adopted measures and determining which measures we re credited in C1 and C2 of the CARB S taff R eport. CARB did not use a rule adoption cutoff date for determining which districts rules reductions should be included. Instead, CARB requested all districts provide approved local rules for inclusion in the i nventory by September 2012. In other words, even if a rule was adopted prior to September 2012, it wasn’t necessarily credited in the inventory baseline for the plan. September 2012 serve d as a date after which the districts could no longer provide CARB wi th adopted rules for inclusion in the inventory reflected in tables C1 and C2. The information in Tables 1 and 2, plus for consumer products in Table 3, was confirmed by CARB . (See docket for more details of email exchanges between EPA and CARB .)

Table I

- 1. Defined and a dopted c ommitment m easures in the Sacramento Regional 8

- Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Progress Plan that have been s ubmitted to EPA. Reductions from measures in the SIP are eligible for credit towards attainment.

Rule No. Rule Titl e Date of Adoption Estimated

Reductions (2018 planning inventory, tpd) 

### Reductions

credit ed in C1 and C2 inventories ? Approved

into the SIP ?
NO x 

### VOC

YSAQMD 2.31 Surface Preparation and

Cleanup 5/14/2008

- 0.8 No No

FRAQMD 3.14 Solvent Degreasing 5/8/2008

- <0.1 No No

1 CARB’s Staff Report includes tables C1: Summer Planning Emissions Inventory for Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) in tons per day Sacramento Nonattainment Area and C2: Summer Planni ng Emissions Inventory for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in tons per day Sacramento Nonattainment Area

.

### 3

YSAQMD 2.37 Large Water Heaters and

Small Boilers 4/8/2009 0.5

- No Yes

PCAPCD 245 Surface Coating of Metal

Parts and Products 8/20/2009

- <0.1 No Yes

FRAQMD 3.22 Internal Combustion Engines 6/1/2009 <0.1

- No Yes

PCAPCD 218 Archi tectural Coatings 10/14/2010

- 0.2 No Yes

SMAQM D 459 Automotive Refinishing 8/25/2011

- 0.1 No Yes

PCAPCD 247 Large Water Heaters and

Small Boilers 10/10/2013 0.5

- No No a

a On September 5 , EPA Region Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld signed propo sed rulemaking and direct final notices to approve notices acting on PCAPCD 247. It is expected that the approval of PCAPCD 247 will be effective prior to a final action on the Sacramento ozone plan.



### Table I

- 2. Other adopted m easures in the Sacramento fede ral ozone nonattainment a rea t hat achieve emissions reductions greater than 0.1 tpd, are not commitments , and h ave not y et b een s u b mitted to EPA. a



### Rule No. Rule Title Date of Adoption Estimated Reductions (tpd) 

### Reductions

included in C1 and C2 inventori es in CARB S taff R eport ? NO x 

### VOC

YSAQMD 2.26 Motor Vehicle & Mobile

Equipment Coating 11/9/1994
, 8/13/1997 - 0.3 Yes

YSAQMD 2.39 Wood Products Coatings

Operations 2/10/1999

- 0.2 Yes

SMAQMD 442 Architectural Coatings 5/24/2001

- 0.6 No

SMAQMD 460 Adhesives and Sealants 11/20/2000

- 1 .0 Yes

a Although there are other district measures adopted but not in the SIP , any measure provid ing less than 0.1 tpd in additional reductions was not included in this table

.

### 4

Table I

- 3. Adopted C ARB measures n ot y et approved by EPA (e.g., not in the SIP ) but credited in C1 and C2.

Measure Title Date of Adoption Reductions

(tpd) Status

- - rule submitted,

authorization or waiver requested? NO x 

### VOC

Large Spark Ignition Engines 11/21/08 TBD TBD On June 2, 2014, CARB submitted an authorization request. Authorization granted for previous Large SI engines measure. Combined NOx and VOC reductions statewide are 1.9 tpd in 2014 and 4.5 tpd in 2020.

Consumer Products 11/18/2010

- 0.3 a 

### Federal Register notices signed on August 5, 2014. b 

### Esti m ated 6.7 tpd reduction statewide.

a EPA estimate based on population in SMA.

b On August 5 , 2014, EPA Region Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld signed prop osed rulemaking and direct final notices acting on the November 2010 consumer products rule. The notices are pending publication in the Federal Register

. It is expected that the approval of the November 2010 consumer products rule will be effective prior t o a final action on the Sacramento ozone plan.


### The Districts have made progress in adopting measures committed to in the 2009 Plan. In the 2013 Plan Update, the Districts revised their remaining commitment measures a nd estimated reductions. Table I

- 4 lists the Districts’ remaining commitment measures and estimated reductions that are not yet in the SIP.

Table 1

- 3 . Defined Districts’ Measures in the 2013 Plan Update that are n ot y et in the SIP, Expected Emissions Reductions

. ( 2018 planning inventory, tpd)

Control Measure Category District Measures Adoption Year Expected

Reductions

NO x 

### VOC

Architectural Coatings EDCAQMD 215 2013

- 0.2

FRAQMD 3.15 2014

- <0.1

SMAQMD 442 2014

- 0.9

YSAQMD 2.14 2014

- 0.2

Automotive Refinishing FRAQMD 3.19 2016

- <0.1

PCAPCD 234 2015

- <0.1

### 5 YSAQMD 2.26 12/10/2008 a



### - <0.1

Degreasing/Solvent Cleaning FRAQMD 3.14 8/1/2011 a



### - <0.1

YSAQMD 2.24/2.31 5/8/2013 a



### - 0.7

Graphic Arts YSAQMD 2.29 2016

- n a

Natural Gas Production and Processing SMAQMD 461 2014

- 0.1

Bo ilers, Steam Generator, and Process Heaters YSAQMD 2.27 2016 0.2

-

Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers EDCAQMD 239 2015 <0.1

-

FRAQMD 3.23 2016 0.0

- Mobile Source Incentive Programs (On Road) ONMS

- LD

- 1, ONMS

- HD

1 2012 0.5 < 0.1
Other Nonregulatory Control Measures OFMS

- HD

- 1, OFMS

- SI

- 1, TCM

- ONMS

- ED

- 1 2009

- 2012 < 0.1 < 0.1

Totals 0.7 2.3

na: not available

a 

### Submitted by CARB to EPA for inclusion in the SIP and pending processing by EPA

### 6

II. 

## EPA Adjustments to 2008 and 2011 Reasonable Further Progress Milestone Demonstrations in 2006 and 2009 State Submittals

Reasonable Further Progress Calculations
The table below represents the RFP demonstrations in the Sacramento ozone nonattainment area for the 1997 ozone standard. Because the 2013 Plan Update did not include recalculated milestone demonstrations for 2008 and 2011, EPA undertook the process of recalculating the 2008 and 2011 demonstrations using the revised 2002 baseline inventory in the 2013 Plan Update. The recalculation of the 2008 and 2011 miles tones involved using the revised 2002 inventory baseline and then adjusting the 2008 and 2011 forecasted VOC and NOx inventories in the 2006 and 2009 State submittals to account for the change in the 2002 baseline inventory. The original 2008 and 2011 demo nstrations submitted by the State are provided further below. The process EPA used to make the adjustments is described below.

Calculation of RFP Demonstrations for SMA VOC Emission Calculations (tons/day) 2002 2008 a 

### 2011 b 

### 2014 c 

### 2017 c 

### 2018 c



### 1. 2002 Basel ine VOC i nventory c 

### 147 147 147 147 147 147

2. Non

- c reditable FMVCP/RVP a djustments d 

### 0 13 e 

### 11 e 

### 11 12 12
3. Adjusted 2002 b aseline VOC i nventory (Line 1

– Line 2) 1 34 13 6 136 135 135

4. VOC e missions f orecast with existing controls + ERCs 1 20 e 

### 1 20 e 

### 1 06 100 99

5. Adjustments to remove reductions from measures not yet approved by EPA f 

### - 2 2 2 2

6 . RFP c ommitment for VOC r eductions from

n ew m easures - 0 0 0 0

7 . Forecasted VOC c reditable r eductions s ince 2002 (ine 3

- Line 4

- Line 5 + Line 6) 15 1 5 28 33 34

8 . Forecasted % VOC r eductions s ince 2002 (Line 7 ÷ Line 3) 1 1 % 1 1 % 2 1 % 2 5% 2 6 %

9 . RFP % r eduction r equired from 2002

a djusted b aseline VOC i nventory g 

### 18% 27% 36% 45% 48%

10 . Forecasted % VOC s hortfall (Line 9

– Line 8 ) 7 % 1 6 % 1 5 % 20 % 2 2 %

1 1 . VOC s hortfall previously addressed provided by NOx substitution % - 7% 16% 16% 20%

1 2 . Actual VOC s hortfall 7% 9% 0% 4% 2%

### 7

NO x 

### Emission Calculations (tons/day) 2002 2008 a 

### 2011 b 

### 2014 c 

### 2017 c 

### 2018 c



### 1 3 . 2002 Baseline NO x 

### i nventory a 

### 165 165 165 1 65 165 165

1 4 . Non

- c reditable FMVCP a djustments d 

### 0 7 e 

### 1 1 e 

### 10 11 11

1 5 . Adjusted 2002 b aseline NO x 

### i nventory (Line 1 3

– Line 1 4 ) 15 8 15 4 15 5 154 154

1 6 . NO x 

### e missions f orecast with existing controls + ERCs 1 26 e 

### 12 6 e 

### 93 80 77

17. Adjustments to remove reductions from measures not yet approved by EPA f 

### 0 3 1 1

1 8 . RFP c ommitment for NO x 

### r eductions from

n ew m easures 0 0 0 0

1 9 . Forecasted NO x 

### c reditable r eductions

s ince 2002 (Line 1 5

- Line 1 6

- Line 17 + Line 1 8) 32 29 59 74 7 6

20 . Forecasted % NO x 

### r eductions s ince 2002 (Line 1 9 ÷ Line 1 6 ) 21 % 19 % 38 % 48% 50%

2 1. NOx previously used for VOC shortfall by NOx substitution % 0% 7% 16% 16% 20%

2 2 . NOx available for VOC shortfall by NOx substitution and contingency % 21% 12% 22% 32% 30%

2 3 . NOx s ubstitution n eeded for VOC s hortfall % (Same as Line 1 2 ) 7% 9% 0% 4% 2%

2 4 . Forecasted % NOx r eduction s urplus (Line 2 2

– Line 2 3 ) 14% 3% 22% 28% 27%

25. C ontingency measure reserve achieved? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

2 6

. RFP achieved? Yes Yes Yes Yes Ye s

a Sacramento Regional Nonattainment Area 8

- Hour Ozone Reasonable Further Pr ogress Plan 2002

- 2008, February 2006, Chapter 6, t able 6

- 1.
b Sacramento Regional 8

- Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan, December 19, 2008, Chapter 5, t abl es 5

- 2 and 5

- 3, adjusted by EPA.

c Sacramento Regional 8

- Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan, September 26, 2013, Chapter 13, t able 13

- 1.
d CARB provided the non

- creditable FMVCP/RVP adjustments in documents listed immediately above.

e Adjusted by EPA for consistency with baseline in 2013 Ozone Plan. See TSD.
f See TSD

. Does not include EPA adjustments for measures approved by EPA (see table 10) but not yet credited by State in RFP demonstration

. g RFP reduction requirements contained in EPA’s Final Rule to Implement the 8

- Hour Ozone NAAQS (Phase 2) published in the November 29, 2005 Federal Register

. S ee 70 FR 70612. Note: Because of rounding convention, values in table may not reflect sum of underlying numbers.

### 8



### RFP demonstration in February 24, 2006 Plan submittal from ARB

.

### 9



### RFP demonstration in April 19, 2009 Plan submittal from ARB.

### 10



### RFP demonstration in December 31, 2013 Plan submittal from ARB.

### 11



## Explanation of RFP Adjustments by EPA

 Adjustments to 2002 VOC and NOx inve ntories

o EPA replaced the 2002 VOC inventory baseline estimates in the 2008 (150 tpd) and 2011 (160 tpd) submittals with the 2002 inventory baseline in the 2013 Plan Update (147 tpd). This was done to allow for a consistent comparison across all the milest one years required for the 1997 ozone standard.

o EPA replaced the 2002 NOx inventory baseline estimates in the 2008 (193 tpd ) and 2011 (196 tpd) submittals with the 2002 inventory baseline in the 2013 Plan Update (165 tpd). This was done to allow for a c onsistent comparison across all the milestone years. This was done to allow for a consistent comparison across all the milestone years required for the 1997 ozone standard.

 Non

- creditable Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program (FMVCP) adjustments

o For 200 8, EPA adjust ed the non

- creditable VOC FMVCP reductions ( 13 tpd ) in 2006 SIP submittal as follows. 1 3 tpd x ratio of baselines in 2006 and 2013 submittals [i.e., 147 (baseline in 2013 SIP submittal) divided by 150 (baseline in the 2006 SIP submittal]. This was done to allow for a consistent comparison across all the milestone years required for the 1997 ozone standard. Because the 2013 Plan Update did not include recalculated milestone demonstration for 2008, EPA undertook the process of recalculating the 2 008 demonstration using the most up to date 2002 baseline inventory. This recalculation involved using the most up

- to

- date 2002 inventory baseline and then adjusting the 2008 non

- creditable VOC FMVCP adjustment t o account for the lower 2002 baseline invent ory in the 2013 Plan Update. For 2008, this resulted in a slightly lower non

- creditable VOC FMVCP (12.7 tpd rounded to 13 tpd) compared to the 1 3 t pd in the 200 6 submittal.

o For 2011, EPA adjusted the non

- creditable non

- creditable VOC FMVCP reductions (1 1. 9 tpd) in 2009 SIP submittal as follows. 11.9 tpd x ratio of baselines in 2009 and 2013 submittals [i.e., 147 (baseline in 2013 SIP) divided by 160 (baseline in the 2008 SIP)]. This was done to allow for a consistent comparison across all the milestone
yea rs required for the 1997 ozone standard. Because the 2013 Plan Update did not include recalculated milestone demonstration for 2011, EPA undertook the process of recalculating the 2011 demonstrations using the most up to date 2002 baseline inventory. This recalculation involved using the most up

- to

- date 2002 inventory baseline and then adjusting the 2011 non

- creditable FMVCP adjustment to account for the lower 2002 baseline inventory in the 2013 Plan Update. For 20 11 , this

### 12 

### resulted in a slightly lower non

- c reditable VOC FMVCP (10.9 tpd rounded to 11 tpd ) compared to the 1 1.9 t pd in the 200 9 submittal.

o For 2008, EPA adjust ed the non

- creditable NOx FMVCP reductions ( 8 tpd) in 2006 submittal as follows

. 8 x ratio of baselines in 2006 and 2013 submittals [i.e., 165 tpd (baseline in 2013 SIP submittal) divided by 193 tpd (baseline in the 2006 SIP submittal)]. Because the 2013 Plan Update did not include recalculated milestone demonstration for 2008, EPA undertook the process of recalculating the 2008 demonstratio n using the most up to date 2002 baseline inventory. This recalculation involved using the most up

- to

- date 2002 inventory baseline and then adjusting the
2008 non

- creditable NOx FMVCP adjustment to account for the lower 2002 baseline inventory in the 2013 Plan Update. For 2008, this resulted in a lower non

- creditable
NOx FMVCP (7 tpd) compared to the 8 tpd in the 2006 submittal.

o For 2011, EPA adjust ed the non

- creditable NOx FMVCP (1 3 tpd) in 200 9 submittal as follows

. 13 tpd x ratio of baselines in 2008 an d 2013 submittals [i.e., 165 tpd (baseline in 2013 SIP submittal) divided by 196 tpd (baseline in the 2006 SIP submittal)]. This was done to allow for a consistent comparison across all the milestone years required for the 1997 ozone standard. Because the 2013 Plan Update did not include recalculated milestone demonstration for 2011, EPA undertook the process of recalculating the 2011 demonstrations using the most up to date 2002 baseline inventory. This recalculation involved using the most up

- to

date 2002 inventory baseline and then adjusting the 2011 non

- creditable NOx FMVCP adjustment to account for the lower 2002 baseline inventory in the 2013 Plan Update. For 20 11 , this resulted in a lower non

- creditable NOx FMVCP (1 1 tpd) compared to the 1 3 tpd foreca st in the 200 9 submittal.

 Adjustment to Emissions Forecasts with existing controls + ERCs ( see b above)

o For 2008, adjustment to VO C forecast (122 tpd ) in 2006 SIP submittal as follows. 122 tpd x ratio of baselines in 2006 and 2013 submittals [i.e., 147 (baseline in 2013 SIP submittal) divided by 150 (baseline in the 2006 SIP submittal]. This was done to allow for a consistent comparison across all the milestone years required for the 1997 ozone standard. Because the 2013 Plan Update did not include recal culated milestone demonstration for 2008, EPA undertook the process of recalculating the 2008 demonstration using the most up to date 2002 baseline inventory. This recalculation involved using the most up

- to

- date 2002 inventory baseline and then adjusting the 2008 VOC projected inventory to account for the lower 2002 baseline inventory in the 2013 Plan Update. For 2008, this resulted in a slightly lower ( 120 tpd) forecast compared to the 122 tpd forecast in the 2006 submittal.

### 13



### o For 2011, adjustment to VOC f orecast (130 tpd) in 2009 SIP submittal as follows. 130 tpd x ratio of baselines in 2009 and 2013 submittals [i.e., 147 (baseline in 2013 SIP) divided by 160 (baseline in the 2008 SIP)]. This was done to allow for a consistent comparison across all the mil estone years required for the 1997 ozone standard. Because the 2013 Plan Update did not include recalculated milestone demonstration for 2011, EPA undertook the process of recalculating the 2011 demonstrations using the most up to date 2002 baseline invent ory. This recalculation involved using the most up

- to

- date 2002 inventory baseline and then adjusting the 2011 projected VOC inventory to account for the lower 2002 baseline inventory in the 2013 Plan Update. For 2008, this resulted in a lower (1 20 tpd) fo recast compared to the 130 tpd forecast in the 2009 submittal.

o For 2008, adjustment to NOx forecast (147 tpd) in 2006 submittal. 147 x ratio of baselines in 2006 and 2013 submittals [i.e., 165 tpd (baseline in 2013 SIP submittal) divided by 193 tpd (basel ine in the 2006 SIP submittal)]. Because the 2013 Plan Update did not include recalculated milestone demonstration for 2008, EPA undertook the process of recalculating the 2008 demonstration using the most up to date 2002 baseline inventory. This recalcula tion involved using the most up

- to

- date 2002 inventory baseline and then adjusting the 2008 NOx projected inventory to account for the lower 2002 baseline inventory in the 2013 Plan Update. For 2008, this resulted in a significantly lower (126 tpd) forecas t compared to the 147 tpd forecast in the 2006 submittal.

o For 2011, adjustment to NOx forecast (146 tpd) in 2008 submittal. 147 tpd x ratio of baselines in 2008 and 2013 submittals [i.e., 165 tpd (baseline in 2013 SIP submittal) divided by 196 tpd (baseli ne in the 2006 SIP submittal)]. This was done to allow for a consistent comparison across all the milestone years required for the 1997 ozone standard. Because the 2013 Plan Update did not include recalculated milestone demonstration for 2011, EPA undertoo k the process of recalculating the 2011 demonstrations using the most up to date 2002 baseline inventory. This recalculation involved using the most up

- to

- date 2002 inventory baseline and then adjusting the 2011 projected NOx inventory to account for the l ower 2002 baseline inventory in the 2013 Plan Update. For 2008, this resulted in a significantly lower ( 126 tpd) forecast compared to the 146 tpd forecast in the 200 9 submittal.

NOTES

EPA’s RFP analysis did not include credit for measures recently approve d by EPA but for which the State did not credit in their demonstration. See tables I

- 1 and III

- 2 in this TSD. EPA allowed credit for measures (i.e., Large Spark Ignition Engines ) for whi ch CARB has requested a waiver or authorization.

### 14

III. 

## EPA Adjustments to Attainment a nd RFP Demonstrations

Table III

- 1 below identifies measures and reductions that are currently not approved by EPA but for which the State has credited towards attainment and RFP in the Sacramento Plan Update and in tables C1 and C2 of CARB ’s Staff Report . E PA adjusted the 2018 baseline in the attainment demonstration and RFP demonstration by removing the reductions associated with these measures or programs.

Table I II

- 1

. Meas ures and reductions currently not approved by EPA but credited by CARB in the inventory baselines used for the Sacramento 2018 attainment demonstration

. a



### Agency Title Date of Adoption Estimated

Reductions (tpd) 

### Comments NO x 

### VOC

YSAQMD Rule 2.26

- Motor Vehicle &

Mobile Equipment Coating 11/9/1994
, 8/13/1997 - 0.3 b 

### Not submitted to EPA

YSAQMD Rule 2.39

- Wood Products

Coatings Operations 2/10/1999

- 0.2 b 

### Not submitted to EPA

SMAQMD Rule 460

- Adhesives and

Sealants 11/20/2000

- 1 .0 c 

### Not submi tted to EPA

CARB Large Spark Ignition Engines 11/21/08 NA NA A uthorization request submitted to EPA on June 2, 2014

. Combined NOx and VOC reductions statewide are 1.9 tpd in 2014 and 4. 5 tpd in 2020.

CARB Moyer (non

- road) None 0.4

- See Table C3 in CARB 2013 Staff Report. Not submitted to EPA

CARB Prop 1B None 0.1

- See Table C3 in CARB 2013 Staff Report. Not submitted to EPA

CARB Truck and Bus Rule 4/25/2014 TBD

- Final rule makin g package not yet submitted to OAL.

Totals 0.5 1. 5

a Although there are other district measures adopted but not in the SIP
, any measure provid ing less than 0.1 tpd in additional reductions was not included in this table

. b email communication s with Y SAQMD (Matt Jones), June 2014

c phone co nversation with SMAQMD (Kevin Williams), June 18, 2014.

### 15



### Table III

- 2 below identifies measures and reductions approved by EPA but for which the State has not yet credited towards attainment in the Sacramento Plan U pdate and tables C1 and C2
in CARB ’s Staff Report . E PA credited these reductions in the 2018 attainment

.

III

- 2. Creditable Reductions from Districts Measures Approved by EPA but not credited in C1 and C2 of CARB’s Staff Report, Expected Emissions Reductio ns (2018 planning inventory, tpd), and Federal Register Cite. EPA adjusted the 2018 baseline by adding reductions associated with these measures.

Agency Rule No. and Title Estimated Reductions (tpd) EPA Approval

NO x 

### VOC

YSAQMD 2.37

- Large Water Hea ters and Small Boilers 0.5

- 75 FR 25778 (May 10, 2010)

PCAPCD 218

- Architectural Coatings

- 0.2 75 FR 18068 (December 5, 2011)

PCAPCD 245

- Surface Coating of Metal Parts and

Products - <0.1 76 FR 30025 (May 24, 2011)

SMAQMD 459

- Automotive Refin ishing

- 0.1 77 FR 47536 (August 9, 2012)

FRAQMD 3.22

- Internal Combustion Engines <0.1

- 77 FR 12493 (March 1, 2012)

PCAPCD 247

- Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers 0.5

- Federal Register notices signed on September 5 , 2014 and pending publication. a



### Totals 1

. 0 0.3

a On September 5 , EPA Region Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld signed proposed rulemaking and direct final notices acting on PCAPCD 247. It is expected that the approval of PCAPCD 247 will be effective prior to a final action on t he Sacramento ozone plan.

### 16



## Summary of Adopted and Creditable Measures

Table III

- 3 . Creditable State Measures Applicable to SMA, Adoption Dates, and Current Status a



### Defined State Measure s Adoption Date EPA Approval

Smog Check Improvements August 31, 20 09 Elements approved, 75 FR 38023 (July 1, 2010)

Modifications to Reformulated Gasoline Program June 14, 2007 Approved, 75 FR 26653 (May 12, 2010)

Cleaner In

- use Heavy Duty Trucks b 

### December 16, 2010 Approved 77 FR 20308, April 4, 2012.

Clean Up Existin g Harbor Crafts November 15, 2007 Authorization granted; 76 FR 77521, December 13, 2011.

Cleaner In

- Use Off

- Road Equipment (over 25 hp) December 17, 2010 Authorization granted; (78 FR 58090, 9/20/13).
Additional Evaporative Emission Standards (for Off

- Ro ad Sources) (e.g., Portable Outboard Marine Tanks and Components) September 25, 2008 

### Similar to federal requirement at 40
CFR 1060.105

Consumer Products Program November 17, 2007 Approved, 74 FR 57074, November 4, 2009

June 26, 2008 Approved, 76 FR 2 7613, May 12, 2011

September 24, 2009 Approved, 77 FR 7535, February 13, 2012

November 18, 2010 Proposed rulemaking and direct final notices signed on August 5, 2014 and pending publication.

a The 2013 Plan Update and CARB’s 2013 Staff Report describ e nonregulatory programs providing emissions reductions through agreements resulting in replacement of older locomotives with cleaner engines. The Union Pacific (UP) rail yard located in Roseville has benefitted from programs targeting NOx and Particulate Matter (PM) emissions. ARB utilized Proposition 1B Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program (“ Prop 1B”) funding for 15 Tier 2 “regional” line haul locomotives. UP also operates six ultra

- low emitting genset switch locomotives within the Roseville rail yar ds. The UP 9900, an experimental Tier 3+ locomotive (Tier 4 PM, and Tier 3+ NOx), has been assigned to UP Roseville and operates primarily in Northern California. CARB’s 2013 Staff Report indicates 0.07 tpd of NO x reduction from the State’s Prop 1B. EPA is not crediting the 0.07 tpd NO x reduction associated with Prop 1B in the Sacramento attainment demonstration because an enforceable measure supporting the reductions has not been submitted to and approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP. EPA has adopted fe deral engines

### 17

standards for locomotives and the resulting reductions from the federal standards are credited in the 2018 inventory. See 73 FR 37096 (June 30, 2008) and 40 CFR part 1033, 1065, and 1068 for more details regarding the federal locomotive stand ards.
b On April 25, 2014, the CARB Board approved Resolution 14

- 3 to revise CARB’s Truck and Bus Rule. The final rulemaking package with the revisions to the Truck and Bus Rule has not yet been submitted to the State’s Office of Administrative Law (OAL) f or their approval.



### III

- 4

. Creditable Reductions from Districts Measures Approved by EPA, Expected Emissions Reductions (2018 planning inventory, tpd), and Federal Register Cite.

Rule No. Rule Title Estimated Reductions (tpd) EPA Approval

NO x 

### VOC

YSA QMD 2.37 Large Water Heaters and Small

Boilers 0.5

- 75 FR 25778 (May 10, 2010)

PCAPCD 218 Architectural Coatings

- 0.2 75 FR 18068 (December 5, 2011)

PCAPCD 245 Surface Coating of Metal Parts and

Products - <0.1 76 FR 30025 (May 24, 2011)

SMAQMD 459 A utomotive Refinishing

- 0.1 77 FR 47536 (August 9, 2012)

FRAQMD 3.22 Internal Combustion Engines <0.1

- 77 FR 12493 (March 1, 2012)

PCAPCD 247 Large Water Heaters and Small

Boilers 0.5

- Federal Register notices signed on September 3, 2014 and pending
pu blication. a



### Totals 1

. 0 0.3

a On September 3, EPA Region Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld signed proposed rulemaking and direct final notices acting on PCAPCD 247. It is expected that the approval of PCAPCD 247 will be effective prior to a final

a ction on the Sacramento ozone plan

## IV. Compilation of Measures Adopted by Sacramento Metro Ozone

Nonattainment Area Districts

 Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (AQMD)

 El Dorado County AQMD

 Feather River AQMD

 Placer County Air Pollutio n Control District

 Yolo

- Solano AQMD

### Status of Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District NO x 

### and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

408 Incinerator Burning 11/29/1983 7/18/2008 12/5/1984 49 FR 47490

411 NOx from Boilers, Process Heaters and

Steam Generators 8/23/2007 7/18/2008 5/6/2009 74 FR 20880

412 Stationary Internal Combustion Engine 6/1/1995 06/16/1995 4/30/1996 61 FR 18959

413 Stationary Gas Turb ines 3/24/2005 9/5/2007 1/10/2008 73 FR 1819

414 Natural Gas

- fired Water Heater 3/25/2010 4/11/2011 11/1/2011 76 FR 67366

441 Organic Solvents 11/29/1983 11/30/1994 1/24/1985 50 FR 3338

442 Architectural Coatings 5/24/2001 05/18/1998 11/9/1998 63 FR 60214 Revision planned for 2014. Reductions from 2001 rule not credited in inventory baseline for attainment plan.

443 Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical &

Polymer Manufacturing 9/5/1996 05/18/1998 11/9/1998 63 FR 60214

### 2 Status of Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District NO x 

### and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

444 Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners 11/29/1983 04/19/1984 1/24/1985 50 FR 3338

446 Storage of Petro leum Products 11/16/1993 11/30/1994 9/16/1994 59 FR 47544

447 Organic Liquid Loading (VOC) 4/2/1998 6/23/1998 11/26/1999 64 FR 66393

44 8 Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage

Containers 2/26/2009 4/11/2011 1/7/2013 78 FR 898

449 Transfer of Gasoline into Vehicle Fuel

Tanks 2/26/2009 4/11/2011 1/7/2013 78 FR 898

450 Graphic Arts 10/23/2008 4/29/2009 4/9/2010 75 FR 18068

451 Surface Coating of Manufactured Metal

Parts & Products 10/28/2010 4/05/2011 11/21/2011 76 FR 71886

452 Can Coating 9/25/2008 9/15/2009 4/9/2010 75 FR 18068

453 Cutback & Emulsified Asphalt Paving

Materials 11/29/1983 4/19/1984 1/24/1985 50 FR 3338

454 Degreasing Operations 9/25/2008 9/15/2009 4/9/2010 75 FR 18068

### 3 Status of Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District NO x 

### and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

455 Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing 9/5/1996 5/18/1998 1/24/1985 50 FR 3338

456 Aerospace Assembly and Component

Coating Operations 10/23/2008 9/15/2009 7/14/2010 75 FR 4072 6

458 Large Commercial Bread Bakeries 9/5/1996 5/18/1998 11/9/1998 63 FR 60214

459 Automotive, Truck and Heavy Equipment

Refinishing Operations 8/25/2011 2/23/2012 8/9/2012 77 FR 47536

460 Adhesives and Sealants 11/20/2000 Not submitted Not in SIP Not in SIP Revision planne d for early 201 5 to update rule.

463 Wood Products Coatings 9/25/2008 9/15/2009 4/9/2010 75 FR 18068

464 Organic Chemical Manufacturing

Operations 9/25/2008 9/15/2009 10/3/2011 76 FR 61057

465 Polyester Resin Operations 9/25/2008 9/15/2009 7/26/2011 76 FR 44493

466 Solvent Cleaning 10/28/2010 4/11/2011 9/29/2011 756 FR 60376

496 Large Confined Animal Facilities 08/24/2006 Not submitted Not in SIP Not in SIP

### 4 Status of El Dorado County Air Quality Management District NOx and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

206 Incinerator Bur ning TBD 11/4/1977 11/2/1978 43 FR 51632

209 Fossil Fuel

- Steam Generator Facility TBD 04/10/1975 06/14/1978 43 FR 25674

215 Architectural Coatings 9/27/1994 11/30/1994 7/18/1996 61 FR 37390

216 Organic Compounds 03/12/84 07/10/84 01/24/85 TBD

224 C utback Asphalt Paving Material 9/27/1994 11/30/1994 8/21/1995 60 FR 43383

225 Solvent Cleaning (Degreasing) 9/27/1994 11/30/1994 8/21/1995 60 FR 43383

229 Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial

Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters 1/23/200 1 5/23/2001 10/10/2001 66 FR 51578

230 Motor Vehicle & Mobile Equipment

Coating 9/27/1994 11/30/1994 4/30/1996 61 FR 18962

231 Graphic Arts 9/27/1994 11/30/1994 7/11/1997 62 FR 37136

232 Biomass Boilers 9/25/2001 11/09/2001 10/14/2003 68 FR 59121

### 5 Status of El Dorado County Air Quality Management District NOx and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

2 33 Stationary Internal Combustion Engines 6/6/2006 7/2/2002 9/13/2002 67 FR 57960 No a dditional reductions from 2006 revision; EPA will discuss with E D CAQMD possible submittal.

234 VOC RACT Rule

- Sierra Pacific Industries 4/25/1995 6/16/1995 9/12/1995 60 FR 47273

235 Surface Preparation and Cleanup 6/27/1995 10/13/1995 4/30/1996 61 FR 18962

236 Adhesives 7/25/1995 10/13/1995 7/18/1996 61 FR 37390

237 Wood Products Coatings 6/27/1995 10/13/1995 7/18/1996 61 FR 37390

238 Gasoline Transfer and Dispen sing 3/27/2001 5/23/2001 8/27/2001 66 FR 44974

239 Natural Gas

- Fired Residential Water

Heaters 3/24/1998 6/23/1998 3/30/1999 64 FR 15129

240 Polyester Resin Operations 2/15/2000 7/26/2000 7/17/2001 66 FR 37154

### 6 Status of El Dorado County Air Quality Management District NOx and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

244 Organic Liquid Loading and Transport

Vessels 9/25/2001 11/9/2001 7/8/2002 67 FR 45067

245 Valves And Flanges 3/27/2001 5/23/2001 8/27/2001 66 FR 44974



### Status of Feather River Air Quality Management District NO x 

### and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date Of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date Of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

3.5 Combination of Emissions 6/1991 1/28/1981 4/12/1982 47 FR 15585

3.8 Storage and Transfer of Gasoline 6/1991 1/28/1981 5/3/1982 47 FR 15856

3.9 Storage of Petroleum Products 6/1991 1/28/1981 4/12/1982 47 FR 15585

3.14 Solvent Degreasing 8/1/2011 2/10/2014 5/3/1982 47 FR 15856 Minimal reductions (<0.1 tpd) ; EPA intends to process in 2014/15.

### 7 Status of Feather River Air Quality Management District NO x 

### and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date Of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date Of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

3.15 Architectural Coatings 11/13/2002 2/10/2014 5/3/1982 4 7 FR 15856 Minimal reductions (<0.1 tpd) ; district is currently revising rule.

3.19 Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating

Operations 8/1/2011 2/10/2014 Not in SIP Not in SIP Minimal reductions (<0.1 tpd) ; EPA intends to process in 2014/15.

3.20 Wood Prod ucts Coating Operations 8/1/2011 2/10/2014 Not in SIP Not in SIP Minimal reductions (<0.1 tpd) ; EPA intends to process in 2014/15.

3.21 Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial

Boilers, Steam Generators, And Process Heaters 6/5/2006 2/10/2014 Not in SI P Not in SIP No sources in the Sacramento ozone NA; EPA intends to process in 2014/15.

3.22 Internal Combustion Engines 6/1/2009 1/10/2010 3/1/2012 77 FR 12493



### Status of Placer County Air Pollution Control District Rule s

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Rec ent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

206 In cinerator Burning 4/11/2013 2/10/2014 Not in SIP Not in SIP Minimal VOC and NOx reductions; EPA intends to process in 2014/2015.

### 8 Status of Placer County Air Pollution Control District Rule s

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Rec ent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

209 Fossil Fuel

- Steam Facility 5/24/1977 11/30/1994 4/30/1997 62 FR 23365

212 Storage Of Organic Liquids 6/19/1997 7/18/2008 6/11/2009 74 FR 27714

213 Gasoline Transfer Into Stationary Storage

Containers 2/21/2013 2/ 10/2014 3/3/1997 62 FR 23365 No additional reductions from 2013 revision ; EPA intends to process in 2014//2015.

214 Transfer Of Gas oline Into Vehicle Fuel

Tanks 2/21/2013 2/10/2014 4/30/1997 62 FR 23365 No additional reductions from 2013 revision; EPA intends to process in 2014/2015.

215 Transfer Of Gasoline Into Tank Trucks,

Trailers and Railroad Tank Cars At Loading Facilities 6/19/1997 7/18/2008 1/31/2011 76FR5277

216 Degreasing Operations 12/11/2003 7/18/08 5/5/2010 75 FR 24406

217 Cutback And Emulsified Asphalt Paving

Materials 10/19/1993 11/30/1994 4/30/1997 62 FR 23365

218 Architectural Coatings 10/14/2010 4/11/2011 12/5/2011 76 FR 75795

219 Organic Solvents 5/20/1985 11/30/1994 4/30/1997 62 FR 23365

### 9 Status of Placer County Air Pollution Control District Rule s

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Rec ent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

223 Metal Container (Can) Coating 10/6/19 94 11/30/1994 3/23/1995 60 FR 15241

229 Fiberboard Manufacturing 6/28/1994 2 / 12 / 2014 7 / 14 /20 14 79 FR 40675 Request to withd raw rule ;
no sources.

230 Plastic Products And Materials

- Paper

Treating Operation 6/28/1994 2 / 12 / 2014 7 / 14 /20 14 79 FR 40675 Request to withdraw rule ;
no sources

231 Industrial, Institutional, And Commerc ial

Boilers, 10/09/1997 3/17/2009 11/1/2011 76 FR 67366

233 Biomass Boilers 6/14/2012 9/21/12 8/29/2013 78 FR 53250

234 Automotive Refinishing Operations

(effective 7/1/2011) 10/14/2010 4/11/2011 12/05/2011 76 FR 75795

235 Adhesives 10/11/2012 2/6/2013 8/30/2013 78 FR 53680

236 Wood Products Coating Operations 10/14/2010 4/11/2011 11/21/2011 76 FR 71886

238 Factory Coat ing Of Flat Wood Paneling 10/14/10 4/11/2011 11/21/2011 76 FR 71886

239 Graphic Arts Operations 10/11/2012 2/6/2013 3/13/201 4 79 FR 14178

### 10 Status of Placer County Air Pollution Control District Rule s

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Rec ent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

240 Surface Preparation and Cleanup 12/11/2003 9/24/13 3/13/2014 79 FR 14178

241 Crematories 4/11/2013 Not submitted Not in SIP Not in SIP No sources in District

242 Stationary Internal Combustion Engines 4/10/2003 12/7/2010 11/1/2011 76 FR 67366

243 Polyester Resin Operations 4/10/2003 12/7/2010 10/3/2011 76 FR 61057

244 Semiconductor Operations 2/9/1995 5/24/1995 7/25/1996 61 FR 38571

245 Surface Coating o f Metal Parts and

Products 8/20/2009 1/10/2010 5/24/2011 76 FR 30025

246 Natural Gas

- Fired Water Heaters 6/19/1997 1 2/7/2010 11/1/2011 76 FR 67366

247 Natural Gas

- Fired Water Heaters, Small

Boilers, and Process Heaters 10/10/2013 5/13/14 Not in SIP Not in SIP Federal Register notices signed on September 5 , 2014 and pending publication

249 Surface Coating of Plastic P arts and

Products 8/8/2013 5/13/14 Not in SIP Not in SIP No reductions; EPA intends to process in 2014/2015.

### 11 Status of Placer County Air Pollution Control District Rule s

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Rec ent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

250 Stationary G as Turbines 10/17/1994 10/19/1994 8/23/1995 60 FR 43713



### Status of Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District NO x 

### and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved in to the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

408 Incinerator Burning 11/29/1983 7/18/2008 12/5/1984 49 FR 47490

411 NOx from Boilers, Process Heaters and

Steam Generators 8/23/2007 7/18/2008 5/6/2009 74 FR 20880

412 Stationary Internal Combustion Engine 6/1/1995 06/16/1995 4/30/1996 61 FR 18959

413 S tationary Gas Turbines 3/24/2005 9/5/2007 1/10/2008 73 FR 1819

414 Natural Gas

- fired Water Heater 3/25/2010 4/11/2011 11/1/2011 76 FR 67 366

### 12 Status of Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District NO x 

### and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved in to the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

441 Organic Solvents 11/29/1983 11/30/1994 1/24/1985 50 FR 3338

442 Architectural Coatings 5/24/2001 05/18/1998 11/9/1998 63 FR 60214 Revision planned for 2014. Reductions from 2001 rule not credited in inventory baseline for attainment plan.

443 Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical &

Polymer Manufacturing 9/5/1996 05/18/1998 11/9/1998 63 FR 60214

444 Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners 11/29/1983 04/19/1984 1/24/1985 50 FR 3338

446 Storage of Petroleum Products 11/16/1993 11/30/1994 9/16/1994 59 FR 47544

447 Organic Liquid Loading (VOC) 4/2/1998 6/23/1998 11/26/199 9 64 FR 66393

448 Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage

Containers 2/26/2009 4/11/2011 1/7/2013 78 FR 898

449 Transfer of Gasoline into Vehicle Fuel

Tanks 2/26/2009 4/11/2011 1/7/2013 78 FR 898

450 Graphic Arts 10/23/2008 4/29/2009 4/9/2010 75 FR 18068

### 13 Status of Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District NO x 

### and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved in to the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

451 Surface Coating of Manufactured Meta l

Parts & Products 10/28/2010 4/05/2011 11/21/2011 76 FR 71886

452 Can Coating 9/25/2008 9/15/2009 4/9/2010 75 FR 18068

453 Cutback & Emulsified Asphalt Paving

Materials 11/29/1983 4/19/1984 1/24/1985 50 FR 3338

454 Degreasing Operations 9/25/2008 9/15/2009 4/9/2010 75 FR 18068

455 Pharmaceutic als Manufacturing 9/5/1996 5/18/1998 1/24/1985 50 FR 3338

456 Aerospace Assembly and Component

Coating Operations 10/23/2008 9/15/2009 7/ 14/2010 75 FR 40726

458 Large Commercial Bread Bakeries 9/5/1996 5/18/1998 11/9/1998 63 FR 60214

459 Automotive, Truck and Heavy Equipment

Refinishing Operations 8/25/2011 2/23/2012 8/9/2012 77 FR 47536

460 Adhesives and Sealants 11/20/2000 Not submitted Not in SIP Not in S IP Revision planned for early 201 5 to update rule.

463 Wood Products Coatings 9/25/2008 9/15/2009 4/9/2010 75 FR 18068

### 14 Status of Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District NO x 

### and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved in to the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

464 Organic Chemical Manufacturing

Operations 9/25/2008 9/15/2009 10/3/2011 76 FR 61057

465 Polyester Resin Operations 9/25/2008 9/15/2009 7/26/2011 76 FR 4 4493

466 Solvent Cleaning 10/28/2010 4/11/2011 9/29/2011 756 FR 60376

496 Large Confined Animal Facilities 08/24/2006 Not submitted Not in SIP Not in SIP

Status of Yolo

- Solano Air Quality Management District NOx and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

2.10 Incinerator Burning TBD 2/21/1972 5/31/1972 37 FR 10856

2.13 Organic Solvents 5/24/1994 11/30/1994 4/30/1996 61 FR 18962

### 15 Status of Yolo

- Solano Air Quality Management District NOx and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

2.14 Architectural Coatings 11/14/2001 01/22/2002 1/2/2004 69 FR 34

2.15 Disposal and Evaporation of Solvents TBD 06/22/197 8 1/29/1979 44 FR 5663 R ecinded

2.16 Fuel Burning Equipment TBD 02/21/1972 1/29/1979 44 FR 5664

2.21 Organic Liquid Storage & Transfer 9/14/2005 10/20/2005 10/31/2006 71 FR 63694

2.22 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities 6/12/2002 08/06/2002 1/23/2003 6 8 FR 3190

2.23 Fugitive Hydrocarbon 8/13/1997 11/30/1994 11/26/1999 64 FR 66393 1997 version n ot yet submitted, but reductions minimal

.

2.24 Solvent Cleaning Operations (Degreasing) 11/14/1990 05/13/1991 12/13/1994 59 FR 64130 Request to be rescinded

su bmitted on 2/10/2014

2.25 Surface Coating or Manufactured Metal

Parts and Products 5/14/2008 11/30/1994 2/12/1996 61 FR 5288 2008 version n ot yet submitted, but reductions minimal

.

2.26 Motor Vehicle & Mobile Equipment

Coating 12/10/2008 02/24/1995 4/30/ 1996 61 FR 18962 EPA has requested submittal of 2008 rule

2.27 Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial

Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters 8/14/1996 10/18/1996 6/17/1997 62 FR 32691

### 16 Status of Yolo

- Solano Air Quality Management District NOx and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

2.28 Cutback & Emulsified Asphalt 5/25/1994 11/30/1994 2/5 /1996 61 FR 4215

2.29 Graphic Arts Printing Operations 5/14/2008 11/30/1994 8/21/1998 63 FR 44792 2008 version not yet submi tted, but reductions minimal.

2.30 Polyester Resin Operation 5/14/2008 06/03/1999 7/21/1999 64 FR 39037 2008 version not yet sub m itted, but reductions minimal.

2.31 Surface Preparation and Cleanup 5/8/2013 2/10/2014 4/2/1999 64 FR 15922 EPA intends to process in 2014/2015.

2.32 Stationary Internal Combustion Engines 10/10/2001 11/28/2001 1/28/2002 67 FR 3816

2.33 Adhesives Opera tion 5/14/2008 06/05/2003 3/22/2004 69 FR 13234 2008 version n ot yet submitted, but reductions minimal

.

2.34 Stationary Gas Turbines 7/13/1994 09/28/1994 9/3/1998 63 FR 46892

2.35 Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Operations 5/14/2008 11/30/1994 2/24/1997 62 FR 8172 EPA has requested submittal of 2008 rule

.

2.37 Natural Gas

- Fired Water Heaters and

Small Boilers 4/8/2009 09/15/2009 5/10/2010 75 FR 25778

2.38 Standards for Municipal Solid Waste

Landfills 3/12/1997 12/3/1998 withdrawn 64 FR 51447 CAA Section 111(d) State Plan for landfills. Adopted 8/14/97

### 17 Status of Yolo

- Solano Air Quality Management District NOx and VOC Rules

Rule No. Rule Date of Most Recent Rule Adopted/ Revised Date of Most

Recent Rule Submitted Date Rule

Approved into the SIP Federal Register

Cite Comments

2.39 Wood Products Coatings Operations 5/14/2008 Not submitted Not in SIP Not in SIP EPA has requested submittal of 2008 rule

2.41 Expandable Polystyrene Manufacturing

Operations 9/10/2008 12/23/2008 9/8/2 011 76 FR 55581 2008 version n ot yet submitted, but reductions minimal

.

2.42 Nitric Acid Production 5/13/2009 09/15/2009 5/10/2010 75 FR 25778

2.43 Biomass Boilers 10/10/2010 4/11/2011 7/2/2012 77 FR 39181

2.44 Central Furnaces 5/13/2009 Not submitted Not in SIP Not in SIP EPA has requested submittal of 2009 rule

## V. C alifornia A ir R esources B oard Rules and Measures 1990

- 2013

August 27 , 2014 Compiled by USEPA, Region 9

### 19 Table of Acronyms

AB Assembly Bill ACC Advanced Clean Ca r CAFE Corporate Average Fuel Economy CARB California Air Resources Board or The Board CARBOB California Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygenate Blending CaRFG California Reformulated Gasoline CCR California Code of Regulations CFR Code of Fe deral Regulations CHE Cargo Handling Equipment EWIR Emission Warranty Information Reporting and Recall FR Federal Register GDF Gasoline Dispensing Facility GHG Greenhouse Gas HDGE Heavy

- Duty Gas Engine HDV Heavy

- Duty Vehicle ISOR Initial Stateme nt of Reasons LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard LDT Light

- Duty Trucks loaded vehicle weight up to 8500 pounds LDV Light

- Duty vehicle LEV I First generation Low Emission Vehicle program, adopted in a 1990

- 1991 rulemaking, and

generally applicable in the 1994

- 2003 model years LEV II (or 2) Second generation Low Emission Vehicle program, adopted in a 1998

- 1999 rulemaking,

and generally applicable in the 2004 and subsequent model years LEV III (or 3) Third generation Low Emission Vehicle program (criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas

emission fleet standards), adopted in 2012, and generally applicable to 2015 and subsequent model years for Criteria Pollutants, and applicable to 2017 and subsequent model years for Greenhouse Gases. MIR Maximum Incremental Reactivity MY Model Year NOx Oxides of Nitrogen OAL (Calofornia) Office of Administrative Law OBD On

- Board Diagnostics OHRV Off

- Highway Recreational Vehicles ORCI Off

- Road Compression

- Ignition PERP Portable Equipment Registration Program PM Par ticulate Matter RVP Reid Vapor Pressure SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SORE Small Off

- Road Engines T Title TRU Transport Refrigeration Units U.S. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency VOC Volatile Organic Compound ZEB Zero Emission Bus ZEV Zero Emission Vehicle

### 20



## Comp ilation of State Measures

Table A

- 1 is a list of all measures adopted by CARB from 1990 until the end of 2013. The table is intended to include any substantive rules that generat ed emissions reductions in the S acramento ozone nonattainment area during the 1990

- 2013 period. This list does not include the limits on pesticide emissions adopted by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation nor the State’s inspection and maintenance program adopted by the California Bureau of Automotive Repair. Measures that are categorized as Not Applicable are either solely administrative (e.g., permit fees, state ambient air quality standards), do not address ozone attainment plan
precursors (e.g., asbestos air toxi c control measure) in the S acramento nonattainment area, or otherwise do not affect emissions ( e.g., test methods) in the S acramento area.

NOTE : The hearing date is the date that appears next to each measure listed in CARB’s Rulemaking Activity web page ( http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/regact.htm ) covering rules adopted between 1994 to present. The hearing date is also generally the date that the California Air Resources Board adopts a resolution in whi ch it approves the measure or amendments to an existing measure. The hearing date is not the date that the measure was approved by the California Office of Administrative Law.

Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Antiperspirant/Deodorants. . T 17, CCR, 94500

- 94506 11/09/89 Consumer products

Transported Pollutants (Ozone). . T 17, CCR, 70500 12/04/89 Not applicable

Emission Control System Warranty. . T 13, CCR, 2035

- 2041, 1977 12/14/ 89 On

- road

Non

- vehicular Test Methods. . T 17, CCR, 94002, 94003 17, &26, 94146

- 94149, 94132, 94135, 94139, 94140 01/11/90 Not applicable

Certification Procedure for Aftermarket Parts. VC 27156 & 38391 02/08/90 On

- road

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Asbestos in Surfacing Applications. . T 17, & 26, CCR, 93106 04/12/90 Not applicable

Test Method for Asbestos in Serpentine Aggregate. . T 17, & 26, CCR, 94147, Method 435 04/12/90 Not applicable

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, & 26, CCR, 90700

- 90704, 93300

- 93347 05/10/90 Not applicable

Airborne Air Toxic Measure for Ethylene Oxide from Sterilizers & Aerators. . T 17, CCR, 93108 05/10/90 Not applicable

### 21 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. . T 17, CCR, 90800.1, 90800, 90802

- 90 803 05/10/90 Not applicable

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Emissions Inventory Criteria and Guidelines. . T 17, & 26, CCR, 93300

- 93347 06/14/90 Not applicable

Consumer Products Regulations for the BAAQMD. . T 17, CCR, 94520

- 94526 06/14/90 Consumer products

Crit eria for Area Designations for the State Ambient Air Quality Standard. . T 17, CCR, 70303 & 70304 06/14/90 Not applicable

Emission Standards for Medium Duty Vehicles. . T 13, CCR, 1900, 1956.8, 1960.1, 1968.1, 2061, 2112, 2139 06/14/90 On

- road

Wintertime Limits for Sulfur in Diesel Fuel. . T 13, CCR, 2255 06/21/90 Fuels

Dioxins Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Medical Waste Incinerators. . T 17, CCR, 93104 07/12/90 Not applicable

Emissions Reduction Accounting Procedures for California Clean Air Act. . T 17, CCR, 70700

- 70704 07/12/90 Not applicable

Identification of Inorganic Arsenic as a Toxic Air Contaminant. . T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 07/12/90 Not applicable

Evaporative Emission Standards. . T 13, CCR, 1976 08/09/90 On

- road

Transport Mitigation Reg ulations. . T 17, CCR, 70600

- 70601 08/09/90 Not applicable

Air Toxic Fee Schedule & Emissions Inventory Criteria and Guidelines. . T 17, & 26, CCR, 90700

- 90704, 93300

- 93347 09/13/90 Not applicable

California Reformulated Gasoline (CaRFG), Phase I. . T 13 , CCR, 2251.5 09/27/90 Fuels

Low Emission Vehicles and Clean Fuels. . T 13, CCR, 1900, 1904, 1956.8, 1960.1, 1960.1.5, 1960.5 and 2111, 2112, 2125, and 2139, 2061. 09/28/90 On

- road

Identification of Trichloroethylene as a Toxic Air Contaminant. . T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 10/11/90 Not applicable

Phase I

- Consumer Products. . T 17, CCR, 94507

- 94517 10/11/90 Consumer products

Controls for Abrasive Blasting. . T 17, CCR, 92000, 92200, 92400, 98500, 98510, 92520, 92530 11/08/90 Not applicable

Heavy Duty Dies el Smoke Emission Testing. . T 13, CCR, 2180

- 2187 11/08/90 On

- road

### 22 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category
Revision to Designation Criteria. . T 17, CCR, 60200

- 60204, 60208 11/08/90 Not applicable

Identification of Vinyl Chloride as a Toxic Air Contaminant. . T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 11/13/90 No t applicable

Conflict of Interest Code. . T 17, CCR, 95001, et. seq. 12/13/90 Not applicable

Emission Standards for Utility and Lawn and Garden Engines. . T 17, CCR, 2400 et. seq. 12/13/90 Off

- road

Identification of Chloroform as a Toxic Air Contaminant . . T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 12/13/90 Not applicable

Limit on Aromatic Content of Diesel Fuel. . T 13, CCR, 2256 12/13/90 Fuels

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. . T 17, CCR, 90800.2, 90801, 90803 02/24/91 Not applicable

Acid Deposition Fe e Regulations. . T 17, CCR, 90621.2, 90620, 90622 04/11/91 Not applicable

Non

- Vehicular Test Methods. . T 17, CCR, 94131, 94132, 94142 04/11/91 Not applicable

Administrative Hearing Procedures. . T 17, CCR, 60075.1, 60075.47 05/09/91 Not applicable

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. . T 17, & 26, CCR, 90700

- 90705 06/13/91 Not applicable

Agricultural Burning Guidelines. T 17, 80130, 80150, 80250, 80260, 80290 07/11/91 Not applicable

Identification of Metallic & Inorganic Nickel Compounds as a Tox ic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, 93000 08/08/91 Not applicable

Onboard Diagnostics for Light

- Duty Trucks and Light & Medium

Duty Motor Vehicles. T 13, CCR, 1977, 1968.1 09/12/91 On

- road

Identification of Perchloroethylene as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 10/10/91 Not applicable

State Ambient Air Quality Standard for SO 2 . T 17, CCR, 70100, 70200, 70201 10/10/91 Not applicable

Onboard Diagnostic, Phase II. T 13, CCR, 1968.1, 1977 11/12/91 On

- road

Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 60200, 6020 9 11/14/91 Not applicable

Low Emission Vehicles amendments revising reactivity adjustment factor (RAF) provisions and adopting a RAF for M85 transitional low emission vehicles. T 13, CCR, 1960.1 11/14/91 On

- road

### 23 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category
California Reformulated Gasoline, Phase II . T 13, CCR, 2250, 2255.1, 2252, 2260

- 2272, 2295 11/21/91 Fuels

Wintertime Gasoline Program. T 13, CCR, 2258, 2298, 2251.5, 2296 11/21/91 Fuels

Specifications for Alternative Motor Vehicle Fuel. T 13, & 26, CCR, 2290, 2291, 2292.1, 2292.2, 2292.3, 229 2 .5 , 2292.6, 2292.7, 1960.1(k), 1956.8(b), 1956.8(d) 12/12/91 Fuels

Heavy Duty Diesel Cycle Engines. T 13, CCR, 2420

- 2427 01/09/92 Off

- road

Phase II

- Consumer Products. T 17, CCR, 94501, 94502, 94505, 94514, 94503.5, 94506, 94507

- 94513, 94515 01/09/92 Consumer products

Identification of Formaldehyde as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 03/12/92 Not applicable

Specifications for Alternative Motor Vehicle Fuels. T 13, & 26, CCR, 2290

- 2292.7, 1960.1(k), 1956.8(b), 1956.8(d) 03/12/92 On

- road

Atmospheric Acidity Protection Fees. T 17, CCR, 90621.3 04/09/92 Not applicable

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90800.3, 90803 04/09/92 Not applicable

Criteria for Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 70303, 70304 05/14/92 Not app licable

Standards and Test Procedures for Alternative Fuel Retrofit Systems. T 13, CCR, 2030, 2031 05/14/92 On

- road

Transported Air Pollutants. T 17, CCR, 70500 05/28/92 Not applicable
Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, & 26, CCR, 90701, 90704 , 90705 07/09/92 Not applicable

Identification of 1.3 Butadiene as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 07/09/92 Not applicable

Phase 2 RFG certification fuel specifications. T 13, CCR, 1960.1, 1956.8(d) 08/13/92 On

- road

CFC Refrigerants in A ir Conditioning Systems. T 13, CCR, 2500 09/10/92 Not applicable

Substitute Fuel or Clean Fuel Incorporated Test Procedures. T 13, CCR, 1960.1(k), 2317 11/12/92 On

- road

Notice of General Public Interest for Consumer Products. T 17, CCR, 94507

- 94517 11/ 30/92 Consumer products

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Emission of Toxic Metals from Non

- Ferrous Metal Melting. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93107 12/10/92 Not applicable

### 24 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category
Criteria for Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 70303.5, 60200

- 60203, 60205, 70303 12/10/92 Not applicable

Smoke Self Inspection Program for Heavy Duty Diesel & Gasoline Engines. T 13, CCR, 2190

- 2194, 2180

- 2187, 1956.8(b) 12/10/92 On

- road

Certification Requirements for Low Emission Passenger Cars, Light

- Duty Trucks & Medium Duty Vehicles. T 13, CCR , 1960.1, 1976, 2061, 1900 01/14/93 On

- road

Transport Mitigation Regulations. T 17, CCR, 70600, 70601 03/11/93 Not applicable

1

- year Implementation Delay in Emission Standards for Utility Engines. T 13, CCR, 2400, 2403

- 2407 04/08/93 Off

- road

Acid Deposi tion Fee Regulations. T 17, CCR, 90622, 90621.4 04/08/93 Not applicable

Identification of Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants as Toxic Air Contaminants. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93001, 39665, 39666 04/08/93 Not applicable

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular So urces. T 17, CCR, 90800.4, 90803 04/08/93 Not applicable

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Emissions Inventory Criteria and Guidelines. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93300

- 93347 06/10/93 Not applicable

Urban Transit Buses. T 13, CCR, 1956.8, 1965, 2112 06/10/93 On

- road

Air Tox ics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, & 26, CCR, 90700

- 90705 07/08/93 Not applicable

Onboard Diagnostic, Phase II. T 13, CCR, 1968.1 07/09/93 On

- road

Mitigation Transport Pollutants. T 17, CCR, 70500, 70600 08/12/93 Not applicable

Wintertime Oxygenate P rogram. T 13, CCR, 2258, 2251.5, 2263(b), 2267, 2298, 2259, 2283, 2293.5 09/09/93 Fuels

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93109, 93110 10/14/93 Not applicable

Diesel Fuel Regulations

- Emergency. T 13, CC R, 2281(h), 2282(1) 10/15/93 Fuels

Conflict of Interest. T 17, CCR, 90500 11/18/93 Not applicable

Criteria for Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 60200

- 60202, 60204, 60206, 60208, 70300

- 70306 11/18/93 Not applicable

### 25 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Off

- Highway Recreational Vehicles. T 13, C CR, 2410

- 2414, 2111

- 2140 01/03/94 Off

- road

Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures. T 13, CCR, 1976 02/10/94 On

- road

SCAQMD's RECLAIM Consideration 03/10/94 Stationary Sources
Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90800 .5, 90803 04/14/94 Not applicable

Predictive Model for Phase II CaRFG. T 13, CCR, 2261, 2262

- 2270 06/09/94 Fuels

Small Refiner Diesel. T 13, CCR, 2282(e)(1) 07/24/94 Fuels
Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, & 26, CCR, 90700

- 90705 07/28/94 Not applicable

Utility and Lawn and Garden Equipment Engines. T 13, CCR, 2403(c), 11(a)(1)(I)(ii), 4(a)(1)(I)(ii) 07/28/94 Off

- road

Alternative Control Plan for Consumer Products. T 17, CCR, 94540

- 94555 09/22/94 Consumer products

Diesel Fuel Certification. T 13, CCR, 1956.8(b)&(d), 1960.1(k), 2292.6 09/22/94 Fuels

Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 60201, 60204 11/09/94 Not applicable

Self Inspection Program for Heavy Duty Diesel & Gasoline Engines. T 13, CCR, 2190

- 2194, 2180

- 2187, 1956.8(b) 11/09/94 On

- road

O nboard Diagnostics, Phase II. T 13, CCR,1963.1, & Certification Procedures 12/08/94 On

- road

Periodic Smoke Inspection Program. T 13, CCR, 2190 12/08/94 On

- road

Specification for Alternative Motor Vehicle Fuels (M100). T 13 CCR, 2292.1 12/08/94 Fuels

Ae rosol Coating Products and Alternative Control Plan. T 17, CCR, 94520

- 94528, 94540

- 94543, 94547... 03/23/95 Consumer products

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90800.6, 90803 04/27/95 Not applicable

Employee

- Based Trip Reductio ns Emission Formula. T 13, CCR, 2330, 2331, 2332 06/29/95 Not applicable

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems. T 17, CCR, 94010

- 94015, 94150

- 94160, 94000

- 94004, 94007. 06/29/95 Vapor Recovery

### 26 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Heavy Duty Vehicle Exhaust Emission Standards. T 13, CCR, 1956.8 an d incorporate test procedures. 06/29/95 On

- road

Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery Standards. T 13, CCR, 1976, 1978 and incorporate test procedures 06/29/95 On

- road

Test Method for Oxygen in Gasoline. T 13, CCR, 2251.5(c), 2258(c), 2263(b) 06/29/95 Fuels

Retrofit Emission Standards. T 13, CCR, 1956.9, 2030, 2031, and incorporate test procedures 07/27/95 On

- road

Antiperspirants and Deodorants, Consumer Products, and Aerosol Coating Products. T 17, CCR, 94500

- 94506, 94508, 94521 09/28/95 Consumer products

Low Emission Vehicle Standards 3 (LEV 3). T 13, CCR, 1956.8, 1960.1, 1965, 2101, 2061, 2062, and incorporate test procedures 09/28/95 On

- road

Test Methods for CaRFG 13, CCR, 2263(b) 10/26/95 Fuels

Required Additives in Gasoline (Deposit Control Additives ). T 13, CCR, 2257 and incorporates testing procedures. 11/16/95 Fuels

CaRFG Housekeeping & CARBOB. T 13, CCR, 2263.7, 2266.5, 2260, 226 2.5 , 2264, 2265, 2272 12/14/95 Fuels

Exemption of Military Tactical Vehicles. T 13, CCR, 1905, 2400, 2420 12/14/95 On Road/Off Road

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, CCR, 90700

- 90705 and Appendix A 01/25/96 Not applicable

CaRFG Variance Requirements. T 13, CCR, 2271 (Emergency) 01/25/96 Fuels

Relaxation of Carbon Monoxide Emission Standards for Utility Engin es. T 13, CCR, 2403 and incorporating test procedures 01/25/96 Off

- road

Postpone Zero Emission Vehicle Requirements. T 13, CCR, 1900, 1960.1, 1976 03/28/96 On

- road

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90803, 90800.7 04/25/96 Not a pplicable

Basin Boundaries for Agricultural Burning (Mojave Desert, South Coast & Salton Sea). T 17, CCR, 60104, 60109, 60114, 80280, 80311 05/30/96 Not applicable

Regulation Improvement and Repeal. T 17, CCR, 93301

- 93355, Appendix A

- E (emissions invento ry) 05/30/96 Not applicable

Regulation Improvements and Repeals (fuel additives). T 13, CCR, 2201, 2202 05/30/96 Fuels

### 27 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category
Emissions Inventory Criteria & Guideline Report. T 17, CCR, 93300.5 07/25/96 Not applicable

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, CCR, 90701

- 90705 Appendix A to §§ 90700

- 90705 09/26/96 Not applicable

Stationary Source Test Methods. T 17, CCR, 94105, 94107, 94114, 94135, 94141, 94143, 94161 09/26/96 Not applicable

Wintertime Requirements for Utility Engines & Off

- Highway Vehicle s. T 13, CCR, 2403 09/26/96 Off

- road

Diesel Fuel Certification Test Methods . T 13, CCR, 1956.8(b), 1960.1(k), 2281(c), 2282(b), (c) and (g) 10/24/96 Fuels

Diesel Fuel Test Methods. T 13, CCR, 1956.8(b), 1960.1(k), 2281(c), 2282(b), (c) and (g) 10/24/96 Fuels

Antiperspirants and Deodorants, Consumer Products, Aerosol Coating Products (ARB Test Method 310). T 17, CCR, 94506(a), 94515(a), 94526 11/21/96 Consumer products

Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 60201

- 60209 11/21/96 Not applicable

Consumer Products and Aerosol Coating Products Amendments. T 17, CCR, 94508

- 94515, 99517, 94321 11/21/96 Consumer products

Transport Pollutants. T 17, CCR, 70500, 70600 11/21/96 Not applicable
Onboard Diagnostics, Phase II, Technical Status. T 13, CCR, 1968.1, 2030, 2031 12/12/96 On

- road

Consumer Products (Hair Spray) Amendments. T 17, CCR, 94509, 94513, 94514 03/27/97 Consumer products

Liquefied Petroleum Gas Propane Limit Specification Delay. T 13, CCR, 2292.6 03/27/97 Fuels

Portable Equipment Registration Program. T 13, CCR, 2450

- 2465 03/27/97 Off

- road

Identification of Inorganic Lead as Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC). T 17, CCR, 93000 04/24/97 Not applicable

Interchangeable Emissions Reduction Credits. T 17, CCR, 91500 05/22/97 Not applicable

Postpone Enhanced Evapor ative Emission Requirements for Ultra

- Small Volume Vehicle Manufacturers. T 13, CCR, 1976 and incorporate test procedures 05/22/97 On

- road

Consumer Products (Mid

- Term Measures) Amendments. T 17, CCR, 94508, 94509, 94513 07/24/97 Consumer products

Off

- Cyc le Emissions Supplemental Federal Test Procedures (SFTPs). T 13, CCR, 1960.1, 2101 and incorporate test procedures 07/24/97 On

- road

### 28 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category
Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, CCR 90701

- 90705 and Appendix A 11/13/97 Not applicable

Area Designations. T 1 7, CCR, 60201 & 60205 11/13/97 Not applicable
Consumer Products (Hairspray Credit Program). T 17, CCR, 94502, 94509, 94522, & 94548 11/13/97 Consumer products

Heavy Duty Vehicle Smoke Inspection Program/Periodic Smoke Inspection Program. T 13, CCR, 2180

- 2188 and 2190

- 2194 12/11/97 On

- road

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17,CCR 90800.... 01/29/98 Not applicable

Small Off

- Road Engines (SORE). T 13, CCR, 2400,2410

- 2414 03/26/98 Off

- road

Classifying Minor Violations. T 17, CCR, 60090

- 60 095 04/23/98 Not applicable

Heavy Duty Vehicle Regulations: 2004 Standards. T 13, CCR, 1956.8, 1965, 2036, 2112 and test procedures 04/23/98 On

- road

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Chrome Plating. T 17, CCR, 93102 05/21/98 Not applicable

Cleaner Burn ing Gasoline Model Flexibility. T 13, CCR, Sections 2260, 2262.1, 2262.3, 2262.4, 2262.5, 2262.6, 2262.7 and 2265 08/27/98 Fuels

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems. T 17, CCR, 94010

- 94015 and 94150, 94156, 94157, 94158, 94159, 94160, 94162 08/27/98 Vapor Rec overy

Identification of Diesel Exhaust as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, CCR, 93000 08/27/98 Not applicable

Gasoline Deposit Control Additive Regulation. T 13, CCR, 2257, and incorporating test procedures 09/24/98 Fuels

Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Fee Regula tions. T 17, CCR, 90701

- 90705 and Appendix A 10/22/98 Not applicable

Area Designations and Criteria for the National and State Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone. T 17, CCR, 60301, 60202, 60205, 60206, 70300

- 70306, 70303.1 10/22/98 Not applicable

L arge Off

- Road Spark

- Ignition Engine Regulations. T 13, CCR, 2430 et seq., and 2411

- 2414 10/22/98 Off

- road

Stationary Source Test Methods. T 17, CCR, 94101

- 94104, 94106, 94108

- 94113, 941T 17

- 94124, 94137 and revision of Method 12. 10/22/98 Not applic able

### 29 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category
Low Emission Vehicles Standards (LEV 2) and Compliance Assurance Program (CAP 2000). T 13, CCR,1961 & 1962 (both new); 1900, 1960.1, 1965, 1968.1, 1976, 1978, 2037, 2038, 2062, 2101, 2106, 2107, 2110, 2112, 2114, 2119, 2130, 2137

- 2140, 2143

- 2148 11/0 5/98 On

- road

Aftermarket Parts for Off

- Road Engines. T 13, CCR, 2470

- 2476 11/19/98 Off

- road

Consumer Products

- LVP

- VOC Definitions And Test Methods. T 17, CCR, 94506, 94506.5, 94508(a)(78), 94515 and 94526, and the amendment of ARB Method 310 11/19/98 C onsumer products

Consumer Products, Aerosol Coatings & Antiperspirants and Deodorants. T 17, CCR, 94501, 94508, 94521, 94522, and 94524 11/19/98 Consumer products

1997 & Later Model Off

- Highway Recreational Vehicles and Engines. T 13, CCR, 2410

- 2414, 241 5 12/10/98 Off

- road

Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 Marine Engines. T 13, CCR, 2440 et seq 12/10/98 Off

- road

Exhaust Standards for (On

- Road) Motorcycles. T 13, CCR, 1958 12/10/98 On

- road

Revisions to Statewide Portable Equipment Registra tion Program. T 13, CCR, 2450

- 2463 12/10/98 Off

- road

Voluntary Accelerated Light Duty Vehicle Retirement Regulations. T 13, CCR, 2600

- 2610 12/10/98 On

- road

Cleaner Burning Gasoline (Increasing the Oxygen Content). T 13, CCR, sections 226 2.5 (b) and 2265(a )(2) 12/11/98 Fuels

Specifications for Liquid Petroleum Gas Used as a Motor Vehicle Fuel. T 13, CCR, 2292.6 12/11/98 Fuels

Cleaner Burning Gasoline, Oxygen Requirement for Wintertime In Lake Tahoe Area/Gas Pump Labeling for MTBE. T 13, CCR, 226 2.5 , and 2 273 06/24/99 Fuels

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems. T 17, CCR, 94011, 94153, 94155, and incorporated test procedures, CP

- 201, TP

- 201.4, and TP

- 201.6 06/24/99 Vapor Recovery

Clean Fuels Regulation Requirements. T 13, CCR, sections 2300

- 2317, and 2303.5, 2311.5 07/22/99 On

- road

Portable Container Spillage Control Measure. T 13, CCR, 2470

- 2478 09/23/99 Off

- road

Administrative Hearing Procedures. T 17, CCR, 60040 and 60075.1

- 60075.45 10/22/99 Not applicable

California Consumer Products Regulation Mid

- Term Measures II. T 17, CCR, 94508, 94509, and 94513 10/28/99 Consumer products

### 30 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category
Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards. T 17, CCR, 60201 11/18/99 Not applicable

CaRFG Phase 3 Amendments (Phase out of MTBE, standards, predictive model). T 1 3, CCR, 2260, 2261, 2262.1, 226 2.5 , 2263, 2264, 2264.2, 2265, 2266 etc... 12/09/99 Fuels

Off

- Road Compression Ignition Engines. T 13, CCR, 2111, 2112, 2137, 2139, 2140, 2141, 2144, 2400, 2401, 2403, 2420, 2421, 2423

- 2427, & appendix A to article 2.1. 01/27/ 00 Off

- road

Transit Bus Standards. T 13, CCR, 1956.1, 1956.2, 1956.3, 1956.4, 1956.8, 1965 02/24/00 On

- road

Agricultural Burning Guidelines. T 17 Amendments 80145, 80T 179, 80100

- 80102, 80110, 80120, 80130, 80140, 80150, 80155, 80160, 80T 170, 80180, 802 00, 80210, 80230, 80240, 80250, 80260, 80270, 80280, 80290, 80300, 80310, 80311, 80320, 80330 03/23/00 Not applicable

Enhanced Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems (Emergency Filing CP

- 201, section 18). T 17, CCR, 94011 03/23/00 Vapor Recovery

Enhanced Gasoli ne Vapor Recovery Systems (In Station Diagnostics and Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery). T 17, CCR, 94011 03/23/00 Vapor Recovery

Air Toxic Control Measure for Chlorinated Toxic Air Contaminants from Automotive Maintenance and Repair Facilities. T 17, CCR , 93111 04/27/00 Other

Consumer Products Aerosol Adhesives Control Measure. T 17, CCR, 94508, 94509, 94512, 94513 05/25/00 Consumer products

Aerosol (Paint) Coatings Products. T 17, CCR, 94700, 94701, 94521

- 94524, 94526 06/22/00 Consumer products

Air To xic Control Measure for Asbestos Containing Serpentine. T 17, CCR, 93106 07/20/00 Not applicable

Conflict of Interest Code. T 17, CCR, 95001, 95002, 95005, and subchapter 9 09/28/00 Not applicable

Rice Straw Conditional Burn Permit Program. T 17, CCR, 80 101, 80156

- 80158 09/28/00 Not applicable

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulations. T 17, CCR, 90705 tables 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, and 4 10/26/00 Not applicable

Antiperspirant and Deodorant Regulations. T 17, CCR, 94502, 94504 10/26/00 Consumer products

Area D esignations for the State Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone. T 17, CCR, 60201 11/16/00 Not applicable

### 31 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

CaRFG Phase 3 Follow

- up Amendments. T 13, CCR, sections 2260, 2261, 2262.3, 226 2.5 , 2263, 2264, 2265, 2266, 2266.5, 2270, 2272, 2273, 2282, 2296, 22 97, 2262.9 and incorporated test procedures 11/16/00 Fuels

CaRFG Phase 3 Test Methods. T 13, CCR, sections 2263(b) 11/16/00 Fuels

Heavy Duty Diesel Engines "Not

- to

- Exceed" Test Procedures. T 13 CCR, 1956.8, 2065 12/07/00 On

- road

Light

- and Medium Duty Lo w Emission Vehicle Alignment with Federal Standards. Exhaust Emission Standards for Heavy Duty Gas Engines. T 13, CCR, 1956.8 &1961 12/07/00 On

- road

Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation Update. T 13, CCR, 1900, 1960.1(k), 1961, 1962 & incorporated Test Proced ure 01/25/01 On

- road

Ozone Transport Assessment. T 17, CCR, 70500 & 70600 04/26/01 Not applicable

Zero Emission Vehicle Infrastructure and Standardization of Electric Vehicle Charging Equipment. T 13, CCR, 1900(b), 1962(b) 1962.1 06/28/01 On

- road

Airbo rne Toxic Control Measure for Asbestos from Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining. T 17, CCR, 93105 07/26/01 Not applicable

Marine Inboard Engines. T 13, CCR, 2111, 2112, 2139, 2140, 2147, 2440

- 2442, 2443.1

- 2443.3, 2444, 2445.1, 2445.2, 244 6, 2444.2 and incorporation of documents by reference 07/26/01 Off

- road

Air Toxic Control Measures for Auto and Mobile Equip Refinishing Coatings containing Hexavalent Chromium and Cadmium Compounds. T 17, CCR, 93112 09/20/01 Not applicable

Air Toxics "H ot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, CCR, 90700

- 90705 10/25/01 Not applicable

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems Test Methods and Compliance Procedures. T 17, CCR, 94010, 94011, 94153, 94155, 94163, 94164, 94165 & incorporated procedures 10/25/01 Vapor Recovery

Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Standards for 2007 and Later. T 13, CCR, 1956.8 and incorporated test procedures 10/25/01 On

- road

Distributed Generation Guidelines and Regulations. T 17, CCR, 94200

- 94214 11/15/01 Other

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems Defects. T 17, CCR, 94006 and incorporated document. 11/15/01 Vapor Recovery

### 32 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Low Emission Vehicle Regulations. T 13, CCR, 1960.1,1960.5, 1961, 1962 and incorporate test procedures and guidelines 11/15/01 On

- road

California Motor Vehicle Service Information Rule. T 13&17, CCR, 1969 & 60060.1

- 60060.7 12/13/01 On

- road

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Outdoor Residential Waste Burning. T 17, CCR, 93113 02/21/02 Other

Voluntary Accelerated Light Duty Vehicle Retirement Regulations. T 13, CCR, 2601

- 2605, 2606 & app endices C & D, and 2607

- 2610 02/21/02 On

- road

On

- Board Diagnostic II Review Amendments. T 13, CCR, 1968.1, 1968.2, 1968.5 04/25/02 On

- road

Diesel Retrofit Verification Procedure, Warranty and In

- Use Compliance Requirements. T 13, CCR, 2700

- 2710 05/16/02 On

- road

Review of California Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter and Sulfates. T 17, CCR, 70100,70200, and 70100.1 06/20/02 Not applicable

CaRFG Phase 3 Amendments. T 13, CCR, 2261, 2262, 2262.4, 226 2.5 , 2262.6, 2262.9, 2266.5, 2269, 22 71, 2272, 2265, and 2296 07/25/02 Fuels

Revision to Transit Bus Regulations Amendments. T 13, CCR, 1956.1, 1956.2, 1956.4,1956.8, and 2112, & documents incorporated by reference 10/24/02 On

- road

Administrative Civil Penalties Program. T 17, CCR, 60065.1

- 60065.45 and 60075.1

- 60075.45 12/12/02 Not applicable

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Diesel Particulate from School Bus Idling. T13, CCR, 2480 12/12/02 On

- road

CaRFG Phase 3 Amendments (specifications for De Minimis Levels of Oxygenates and MTBE Phase Out Issues). T 13, CCR, 2261, 2262.6, 2263, 2266.5, 2272, 2273, 2260, 2273.5 12/12/02 Fuels

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems Test Procedures. T 17, CCR, 94010, 94011, 94163, 94164, and 94165 and procedures incorporated by reference, and 94166, 94167, and incorporation by reference. 12/12/02 Vapor Recovery

Low Emission Vehicles II. Align Heavy Duty Gas Engine Standards with Federal Standards; minor administrative changes. T 13, CCR, 1961, 1965, 1956.8, 1956.1, 1978, 2065 and documents incorporated by reference 12/12/02 On

- road

### 33 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category
Zero Emission Vehicle Amendments for 2003. T 13, CCR, 1960.1(k), 1961(a) and (d), 1900, 1962, and documents incorporated by reference 03/25/03 On

- road

Ozone Transport Mitigation Regulations. T 17, CCR, 70600 and 70601 05/22/03 Not applicable

Off

- Highway Recreation Vehicles. T13, CCR, 2415 07/24/03 Off

- road

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90800.75, 90800.9, 90804, 90800.8, 90801, 90802, and 90803 07/24/03 Not applicable

Specifications for Motor Veh icle Diesel Fuel. T 13 & T 17, CCR, 1961, 2281, 2282, 2701, 2284, 2285, 93114, and incorporated test procedure 07/24/03 Fuels

Solid Waste Collection Vehicles. T 13, CCR, 2020, 2021, 2021.1, 2021.2 09/24/03 On

- road

Small Off

- Road Engines (SORE). T 13, CCR , 2400

- 2409, 2405.1, 2405.2, 2405.3, 2750

- 2754, 2754.1, 2754.2, 2755

- 2767, 2767.1, 2768

- 2773 and the documents incorporated by reference 09/25/03 Off

- road

Revised Tables of Maximum Incremental Reactivity Values. T 1, CCR, 94700. 12/03/03 Consumer products

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Diesel Particulate for Transport Refrigeration Units. T 13, CCR, 2022 & 2477 12/11/03 Off

- road

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Stationary Compression Ignition Engines. T 17, CCR 93115 & documents incorporate by refe rence 12/11/03 Other

Diesel Retrofit Verification Procedure, Warranty and In

- Use Compliance Requirements (Amendments). T 13, CCR, 2701

- 2707 & 2709 12/11/03 On

- road

Area Designation Criteria and Area Designations for State PM 2.5 and Ozone Ambient Air Qua lity Standards. T 17, CCR, 60201, 60202, 60205, 60210 01/22/04 Not applicable

CA Motor Vehicle Service Information Rule. T 13, CCR, 1969 01/22/04 On

- road

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Diesel

- Fueled Portable Engines. T 17, CCR,93116, 93116.1, 93116.2 , 93116.3, 93116.4, and 93116.5 02/26/04 Off

- road

Modifications to the Statewide Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP) Regulations . T 13, CCR Amendments to 2450

- 2465, and repeal of 2466 02/26/04 Off

- road

### 34 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Heavy Duty Diesel Engine

- Chip Reflash. T 13, CCR, 2011, 2180.1, 2181, 2184, 2185, 2186, 2192, and 2194 03/27/04 On

- road

Engine Manufacturer Diagnostic System Requirements for 2007 and Subsequent Model Heavy Duty Engines. T 13, CCR, 1971 05/20/04 On

- road

Consumer Products & Methods 310/ATCM for Para

Dicholorobenzene. T 17, CCR, 94501, 94506, 94507, 94508, 94509, 94510, 94512, 94513, 94515, and 94526, and ARB Method 310, which is incorporated by reference 06/24/04 Consumer products

Urban Bus Engines/Fleet Rule for Transit Agencies. T 13, CCR, 1 956.1, 1956.2, 1956.3, and 1956.4, 06/24/04 On

- road

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Diesel Particulate from Diesel Fueled Commercial Vehicle Idling. T 13, CCR, 2485 07/22/04 On

- road

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems at Dispensing Facilities. Emergency Filing. T 17, CCR, 94011 07/22/04 Vapor Recovery

Unihose Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems. T17, CCR, 94011 07/22/04 Vapor Recovery

Gasoline Vapor Recovery System Equipment Defects List. T 17, CCR, 94006(b) & incorporated document 08/24/04 Vapor Recovery

Greenhouse Gas. T 13, CCR, 1961.1, 1900, 1961 and Incorporated Test Procedures 09/23/04 On

- road

California Reformulated Gasoline, Phase 3. T 13, CCR, 2260, 2262, 2262.4, 226 2.5 , 2262.6, 2262.9, 2263, 2265 (and the incorporated “California Procedures”), an d 2266.5 11/18/04 Fuels

Diesel Fuel Standards for Harbor Craft & Locomotives. T 13, CCR, 2299, 2281, 2282, and 2284, and T 17, CCR, 93117 11/18/04 Fuels

Enhanced Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems Extension. T 17, CCR, 94011 and certification procedure 11/ 18/04 Vapor Recovery

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T17, CCR 90805 and 90806; and 90800.8 and 90803 11/18/04 Not applicable

Emergency Regulation for Temporary Delay of Diesel Fuel Lubricity Standard. T 13, CCR, 2284 11/24/04 Fuels

### 35 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Air borne Toxic Control Measure for Hexavalent Chromium and Nickel from Thermal Spraying. T 17, CCR, 9310 2.5 12/09/04 Not applicable

Off

- Road Compression Ignition Engines. T 13, CCR, 2420, 2421, 2423, 2424, 2425, 2427 12/09/04 Off

- road

Area Designations. T 1 7, CCR, 60201, 60202, 60205, 60210 01/20/05 Not applicable

Transit Fleet Rule. T 13, CCR, 2023, 2023.1, 2023.2, 2023.3, 2023.4, 1956.1, 2020, 2021, repeal 1956.2, 1956.3, 1956.4 02/24/05 On

- road

State Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone. T 17, CCR, 7 0100, 70100.1, and 70200 04/28/05 Not applicable

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Stationary Compression Ignition Engines (amendments). T 17, CCR, 93115 05/26/05 Other

Definition of Large Confined Animal Facility. T 17, CCR 86500 and 86501 06/23/05 Not applicable

On

- Board Diagnostic System Requirements for 2010 and Subsequent Model

- Year Heavy

- Duty Engines (HD OBD). T 13, CCR, 1971.1 07/21/05 On

- road

Reid Vapor Pressure Limit. Emergency Rule. T 13, CCR, 2262 and 2262.4 08/08/05 Fuels

2007

- 2009 Model

- Y ear Heavy Duty Urban Bus Engines and the Fleet Rule for Transit Agencies. T 13, CCR, 1956.1, 1956.2, and 1956.8 09/15/05 On

- road

Portable Fuel Containers (PFC) [Part 2 of 2]. T 13, CCR 2467.2, 2467.3, 2467.4, 2467.5, 2467.6, 2467.7; repeal of 2467.8, and adoption of new 2467.8 and 2467.9. 09/15/05 Off road

Portable Fuel Containers (PFC) [Part 1 of 2]. T 13, CCR, 2467 and 2467.1 09/15/05 Off road

Requirements to Reduce Idling Emissions from New and In

- Use Trucks, Beginning in 2008. T 13, CCR section1956 .8 and the incorporated document 10/20/05 On

- road

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Cruise Ships Onboard Incineration. T 17, CCR, 93119 11/17/05 Off road

Marine Inboard Sterndrive Engines. T 13 CCR 2111, 2112, 2441, 2442, 2444.2, 2445.1, 2446, 2447, and incorporated document 11/17/05 Off

- road

Auxiliary Diesel Engines and Diesel

- Electric Engines Operated on Ocean

- Going Vessels within California Waters and 24 Nautical Miles of the California Baseline. T 13, CCR, 2299.1 and T 17, CCR, 93118 12/08/05 Off

- ro ad

### 36 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Diesel Particulate Matter Control Measure for On

- Road Heavy

Duty Diesel

- Fueled Vehicles Owned or Operated by Public Agencies and Utilities. T 13, CCR, 2022 and 2022.1 12/08/05 On

- road

Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment at Ports and Intermodal Rail Yards. T 13, CCR, 2479 12/08/05 On and Off

- road

AB1009 Heavy

- Duty Vehicle Smoke Inspection Program. T 13, CCR, 2180, 2180.1, 2181, 2182, 2183, 2184, 2185, 2186, 2187, and 2188, 2189 01/26/06 On

- road

Identification of Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, CCR, 93000 01/26/06 Not applicable

Diesel Verification Procedure, Warranty & In

- Use. T 13, CCR, 2702, 2703, 2704, 2706, 2707, and 2709. 03/23/06 On

- road

Technical Amendments to Evaporative Exhaust and Evaporative Emissions Test Procedures. T 13, CCR , 1961,1976 and 1978. 05/25/06 On

- road

Fork Lifts and Other Industrial Equipment. (Large Off

- Road Spark Ignition Engines > 1 liter) T 13, CCR 2430, 2433, 2434. Adopt 2775, 2775.1, 2775.2, 2780, 2781, 2783, 2784, 2785, 2786, 2787, 2788, and 2789. 05/26/06 Off

- road

California Motor Vehicle Service Information Rule. T 13, CCR, 1969 and incorporated documents 06/22/06 On

- road

Evaporative and Exhaust Emissions Test Procedures . T13, CCR, 1961, 1976, 1978 06/22/06 On

- road

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems. T 17 CCR 94011 and incorporated certification 06/22/06 Vapor Recovery

Portable Equipment Registration Program. T 13, CCR, 2450, 2451, 2452, 2453, 2454, 2455, 2456, 2457, 2458, 2459, 2460, 2461 , 2462, 2463, 2464, and 2465 06/22/06 Off

- road

Off

- Highway Recreational Vehicles and Engines. T 13, CCR, 2411

- 2413, 2415 & documents incorporated by reference 07/20/06 Off

- road

Heavy

- Duty In

- Use Compliance Regulation. T 13, CCR, 1956.1, 1956.8, and docum ents incorporated by reference 09/28/06 On

- road

On

- Board Diagnostic II. T 13, CCR, 1968.2, 1968.5, 2035, 2037 and 2038 09/28/06 On

- road

Distributed Generation Guidelines and Regulations. T 17, CCR, 94201, 94201.1, 94203, 94204, & 94207

- 942142 10/19/06 Ot her

Zero Emission Bus Regulation. T13, CCR, 2023.1, 2023.3, & 2023.4 10/19/06 On

- road

### 37 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category
Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Emissions Inventory Criteria and Guidelines. T 17, CCR, 93300.5 and document incorporated by reference 11/16/06 Not applicable

Airborne Toxic Co ntrol Measure for Cruise Ships and Ocean

Going Ships Onboard Incineration (amendments). T 17, CCR, 93119 11/16/06 Off

- road

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Stationary Compression Ignition Engines (amendments, Agricultural Eng. Exemption removal). T 17, CCR, 93115.1

- 93115.15.t. 11/16/06 Other

Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards. T 17, CCR, 60201, 60202, 60205, & 60210 11/16/06 Not applicable

Consumer Products. T 17, CCR, 94508

- 94510, 94513 & 94523 11/17/06 Consumer products

Emerg ency Regulation for Portable Equipment Registration Program, Airborne Toxic Control Measures and Portable and Stationary diesel

- Fueled Engines. T 13, CCR, 2452, 2455, 2456, 2461; T17 CCR 93115, 93116.2, 93116.3 12/06/06 Off

- road

Airborne Toxic Control Mea sure for Chrome Plating and Chromic Acid Anodizing Operations. T 17, CCR, 93102.1

- 93102.16 12/07/06 Not applicable

Voluntary Accelerated Retirement Regulation. T 13, CCR, 2601

- 2610 and appendices A

- D 12/07/06 On

- road

Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Operations 1/25/07 Not applicable

State Ambient Air Quality Standard for Nitrogen Dioxide 2/22/07 Not applicable

Portable Equipment Registration Program

. 3/22/07 Off

- road

Formaldehyde Emissions from Composite Wood Products 4/26/07 N ot applicable

In

- Use Off

- Road Diesel Vehicles 5/24/07, 7/26/07 Off

- road

Phase 3 California Reformulated Gasoli ne Regulations (Ethanol Permeation) 06/14/07 Fuels

Smog Index Labels Regulations 6/21/07 Not applicable

Vapor Rec overy Aboveground Storage Tanks 6/21/07 Vapor recovery

Indoor Air Cleaning Devices 9/27/07 Not applicable

Aftermarket (New) Catalytic Converters and Used Catalytic Converters

. 10/25/07 On

- road

### 38 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Commercial Harbor Craft 11/15/07 Of f

- road

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mandatory Reporting 12/06/07 Not applicable

Heavy

- Duty Diesel In

- Use Compliance ~ Gaseous Pollutant Measurement 12/06/07 On

- road

In

- Use On

- Road Diesel

- Fueled Heavy

- Duty Drayage Trucks 12/06/07 On

- road

Ocean

- Going Vessels While At Berth At A California Port 12/06/07 Off

- road

Port Truck Modernization. 12/07/07 On

- road

Vapor Recovery Defects List N/A Vapor recover y

Verification Procedure, Warranty and In

- Use Compliance to Control Emissions from Diesel Engines 1/24/08 On

- road

Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation 3/27/08 On

- road

Consumer Products Regulation 6/26/08 Consumer products

Fuel Requirements for Ocean

- Going Vessels 7/24/08 Fuels/Off

- road

Spark

- Ignition Marine Engine and Boat Regulations 7/24/08 Off

- road

Air Quality Improvement Program For the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle and Technology Program 9/25/08 On

- road

Portable Outboard Marine Tanks and Components 9/25/08 Off

- road

Large Spark Ignition Engines 11/21/08 Off

- road

Small Off Road Engine Regulatio ns 11/21/08 Off

- road

Truck / Bus Regulation 2008 12/11/08 On

- road

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Heavy

- D uty Vehicles 12/11/08 On

- road

In

- Use Off

- Road Diesel Fueled Fleets 1/22/09 Off

- road

Small Containers of Automotiv e Refrigerant 1/22/09 Not applicable

Aftermarket Critical Emission Control Parts on Highway Motorcycles 1/22/09 On

- road

Semiconductor Operations 2/26/09 Not applicable

### 39 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Sulfur Hexafluoride Emissions in Non

- Semiconductor and Non

Utility Applications 2/26/09 Not applicable

Tire Pressure Regulation 3/26/09 On

- road

Low Carbon Fuel Standard 4/23/09 On

- road

Air Quality Improvement Program 4/23/09 On

- road

Plug

- In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Test Procedure Amendments and Aftermarket Parts Certification Requirements 5/28/09 On

- r oad

Heavy

- Duty On

- Board Diagnostics 5/28/09 On

- road

Enhanced Fleet Modernization Program (Car Scrap) (former ly “Expanded Vehicle Retirement Program”). 6/26/09 On

- road

Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills 6/26/09 Not applicable

In

- Use Off

- Road Diesel Fueled Fleets 7/23/09 Off

- road

AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation 9/24/09 Not applicable

New Passenger Motor Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards 9/24/09 On

- road

Consumer Products Regulation and Test Method 310 9/24/09 C onsumer products

Emission Warranty Information Reporting and Recall Regulations 11/19/09 On

- road

Tables of Ma ximum Incremental Reactivity Values 11/3/09 Not applicable

High Global Warming Potential Refrigerants for Stationary Sources 12/9/09 Not applicable

Indoor Air Cleaning Devices 12/9/09 Not applicable

Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP), Portable Engine ATCM, and In

- Use Off

- Road Diesel

- F ueled Vehicles 1/28/10 Off

- road
Verification Procedure, Warranty and In

- Use Compliance Requirements for In

- Use Strategies to Control Emissions from Diesel Engines 1/28/10 On

- and off

- road

New Passenger Motor Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards 2/25/10 On

- road

Sulfur Hexafluoride Emissio ns from Gas Insulated Switchgear 2/25/10 Not applicable

Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards 3/25/10 Not applicable

Commercial Harbor Craft Operated Within California Waters and 24 Nautical Miles of the California Baseline 6/24/10 Off

- road

### 40 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category
Energy Efficiency and Co

- Benefits As sessment of Large Industrial Facilities 7/22/10 Not applicable

Periodic Smoke Inspection Program 10/21/10 On

- road

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Stationary Compression Ignition Engines 10/21/10 Not applicable

Consumer Products Regulations 11/18/10 Consumer products

Transport Refrigeration Units 11/18/10 Off

- road

California Cap

- and

- Trade Program 12/16/10 Not applicable

Truck and Bus Regulation 2010 12/16/10 On

- road

In

- Use Off

- Road Diesel

- Fueled Fleets 12/16/10 Off

- road

Mandatory Reporting for Greenhouse Gas Emissions 12/16/10 Not applicable

Low Carbon Fuel Standard Intensity Lookup Tables 2/24/11 On

- road

Ocean

- Going Vessels Within California Waters and 24 Nautical Miles of the California Baseline 6/23/11 Off

- road

He avy

- Duty Diesel In

- Use Compliance Regulation 6/23/11 On

- road

Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards 6/23/11 Not applicable

Vapor Recovery Certification and Test Procedures 9/22/11 Vapor Recovery

Mobile Cargo Handling 9/22/11 On and Off

- road

AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation 10/20/11 Not applicable

California Reformulated Gasoline Regulations 10/20/11 Fuels

Transport Refrigeration Units 10/20/11 Off

- road

Specially Constructed Vehicles (Kit Cars) 11/17/11 On

- road

Small Off

- Road Engine and Tier 4 Off

- Road Compression

Ignition Engine Regulations and Test Procedures; and, Amendments to the Exhaust Emission Certification Test Fuel for Off

- Road Spark

- Ignition Engines, Equipm ent, and Vehicles 12/16/11 Off

- road

Low Carbon Fuel Standard 12/16/11 On

- road

### 41 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

Vapor Recovery Equipment Defects List N/A Vapor Recovery

Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards N/A Not applicable

L ow

- Emission Vehicle and GHG 2012 ( Advanced Clean Cars Program) 1/26/12 On

- road

Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation 1/26/12 On

- road

Cap and Trade Regulation 6/28/12 Not applicable

Heavy

- Duty OBD and OBD II Regulation 8/23/12 On

- road

Verification Procedures Regulation 8/23/12 On

- and Off

- road

Mandatory Reporting, Fee Regulation and Cap and Trade 2012 9/20/12 Not applicable

Consumer Products: Automotive Windshield Washer Fluid Products 10/18/12 Consumer products

Emergency Regulation for Tractor Trailer Gr eenhouse Gas Regulation N/A On

- road

LEV III GHG and ZEV Regulation Amendments for Federal Compliance Option 11/15/12 On

- road

Alternative Fuel Conversion Certification Procedures 9/26/13 Fuels

Area Designations ( 2013 Amendments to Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Stan dards) N/A Not applicable

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Test Methods 1/25/13 Fuels

Off

- Highway Recreational Veh icles 7/25/13 Off

- road

Vapor Recovery Systems at GDFs and Cargo Tanks 7/25/13 Vapor recovery

Consumer Products 9/26/13 Consumer Products

Cap and Trade 10/24/13 Not applicable

Mandatory Reporting 10/24/13 Not a pplicable

Mobile Agricultural Equipment 10/24/13 Off

- road

Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation 10/24 /13 On

- road

Heavy Duty GHG Phase 1 12/12/13 On

- road

### 42 

### Table A

- 1 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resource Board

1990 to 2013

M easure Hearing Date Category

### 43



## A

- 2. State Fuel Measures

CARB has adopted a number of revisions to its reformulated gasoline program and clean diesel pro gram since 1990, as well as measures addressing other motor vehicle fuels and fuel standards for off

- road sources. Table A

- 2 is a list of these revisions.

Table A

- 2 Fuel Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Heari ng Date 1 Comments

Wintertime Limits for Sulfur in Diesel Fuel. T 13, CCR, 2255 06/21/90 Renumbered to section 2281. Approved 60 FR 43379 (8/21/95)

California Reformulated Gasoline (CaRFG), Phase I. T 13, CCR, 2251.5 09/27/90 RVP standard for period betwe en 1992 and 1996. Obsolete.

Limit on Aromatic Content of Diesel Fuel. T 13, CCR, 2256 12/13/90 Renumbered to section 2282. Approved 60 FR 43379 (8/21/95) (listed as 4/15/01 adoption in FR)

California Reformulated Gasoline, Phase II. T 13, CCR, 2250, 2255 .1, 2252, 2260

- 2272, 2295 11/21/91 Approved 60 FR 43379 (8/21/95)

Wintertime Gasoline Program. T 13, CCR, 2258, 2298, 2251.5, 2296 11/21/91 Approved 60 FR 43379 (8/21/95)

Wintertime Oxygenate Program. T 13, CCR, 2258, 2251.5, 2263(b), 2267, 2298, 2259, 2283, 2293.5 09/09/93 Carbon monoxide control measure

Diesel Fuel Regulations

- Emergency. T 13, CCR, 2281(h), 2282(1) 10/15/93 Approved 60 FR 43379 (8/21/95)

Predictive Model for Phase II CaRFG. T 13, CCR, 2261, 2262

- 2270 06/09/94 Superseded by 11/18/ 04 & 6/14/07 rules
Small Refiner Diesel. T 13, CCR, 2282(e)(1) 07/24/94 Approved 60 FR 43379 (8/21/95)

Test Method for Oxygen in Gasoline. T 13, CCR, 2251.5(c), 2258(c), 2263(b) 06/29/95 Section 2251.5

- obsolete; section 2258 wintertime; section 2263, superseded

Test Methods for CaRFG 13, CCR, 2263(b) 10/26/95 Superseded by 11/18/04 & 6/14/07 rules

Required Additives in Gasoline (Deposit Control Additives). T 13, CCR, 2257 and incorporates testing procedures. 11/16/95 Superseded by 11/18/04 & 6/14/07 rules

CaRFG Housekeeping & CARBOB. T 13, CCR, 2263.7, 2266.5, 2260, 226 2.5 , 2264, 2265, 2272 12/14/95 Superseded by 11/18/04 & 6/14/07 rules

CaRFG Variance Requirements. T 13, CCR, 2271 (Emergency) 01/25/96 Superseded by 11/18/04 & 6/14/07 rules

### 44 

### Table A

- 2 Fuel Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Heari ng Date 1 Comments

Regulat ion Improvements and Repeals (fuel additives). T 13, CCR, 2201, 2202 05/30/96 Repealed sections

Diesel Fuel Test Methods. T 13, CCR, 1956.8(b), 1960.1(k), 2281(c), 2282(b), (c) and (g) 10/24/96 Approved 75 FR 26653 (5/12/10)

Liquefied Petroleum Gas Prop ane Limit Specification Delay. T 13, CCR, 2292.6 03/27/97 Expired

Cleaner Burning Gasoline Model Flexibility. T 13, CCR, Sections 2260, 2262.1, 2262.3, 2262.4, 226 2.5 , 2262.6, 2262.7 and 2265 08/27/98 Superseded by 11/18/04 & 6/14/07 rules

Gasoline Depos it Control Additive Regulation. T 13, CCR, 2257, and incorporating test procedures 09/24/98 Superseded by 11/18/04 & 6/14/07 rules

Cleaner Burning Gasoline (Increasing the Oxygen Content). T 13, CCR, sections 226 2.5 (b) and 2265(a)(2) 12/11/98 Wintertime g asoline for South Coast and Imperial County.

Specifications for Liquid Petroleum Gas Used as a Motor Vehicle Fuel. T 13, CCR, 2292.6 12/11/98 No identifiable emissions reductions

Cleaner Burning Gasoline, Oxygen Requirement for Wintertime In Lake Tahoe Area/Gas Pump Labeling for MTBE. T 13, CCR, 226 2.5 , and 2273 06/24/99 Not applicable to the SC area/Obsolete

CaRFG Phase 3 Amendments (Phase out of MTBE, standards, predictive model). T 13, CCR, 2260, 2261, 2262.1, 226 2.5 , 2263, 2264, 2264.2, 2265, 2266 e tc... 12/09/99 2262.1 renumber to 2262.4; 2264 (designation of alternative limits) not approved; otherwise superseded by 11/18/04 and 6/14/07 rules

CaRFG Phase 3 Test Methods. T 13, CCR, sections 2263(b) 11/16/00 Superseded by 11/18/04 & 6/14/07 rules

CaRF G Phase 3 Follow

- up Amendments. T 13, CCR, sections 2260, 2261, 2262.3, 226 2.5 , 2263, 2264, 2265, 2266, 2266.5, 2270, 2272, 2273, 2282, 2296, 2297, 2262.9 and incorporated test procedures 11/16/00 Superseded by 11/18/04 & 6/14/07 rules

CaRFG Phase 3 Amend ments. T 13, CCR, 2261, 2262, 2262.4, 226 2.5 , 2262.6, 2262.9, 2266.5, 2269, 2271, 2272, 2265, and 2296 07/25/02 Superseded by 11/18/04 & 6/14/07 rules

CaRFG Phase 3 Amendments (specifications for De Minimus Levels of Oxygenates and MTBE Phase Out Issues). T 13, CCR, 2261, 2262.6, 2263, 2266.5, 2272, 2273, 2260, 2273.5 12/12/02 Superseded by 11/18/04 & 6/14/07 rule. Approved 75 FR 26653 (5/12/10) (except for section 2272 (CaRFG3 standards for small refineries) and 2273.5 (requirement to identify gasoline co ntaining ethanol when delivered to retail station))

Specifications for Motor Vehicle Diesel Fuel. T 13 & T 17, CCR, 1961, 2281, 2282, 2701, 2284, 2285, 93114, and incorporated test procedure 07/24/03 Approved 75 FR 26653 (5/12/10)

### 45 

### Table A

- 2 Fuel Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Heari ng Date 1 Comments

California Reformulate d Gasoline, Phase 3. T 13, CCR, 2260, 2262, 2262.4, 226 2.5 , 2262.6, 2262.9, 2263, 2265 (and the incorporated “California Procedures”), and 2266.5 11/18/04 Approved 75 FR 26653 (5/12/10)

Diesel Fuel Standards for Harbor Craft & Locomotives. T 13, CCR, 229 9, 2281, 2282, and 2284, and T 17, CCR, 93117 11/18/04 See CARB 6/29/09 Letter

Emergency Regulation for Temporary Delay of Diesel Fuel Lubricity Standard. T 13, CCR, 2284 11/24/04 Temporary delay of standard. Expired

Reid Vapor Pressure Limit. Emergency Rule. T 13, CCR, 2262 and 2262.4 08/08/05 Operative for September and October 2005 only. Obsolete. Phase 3 Reformulated Gasoline (Ethanol Permeation). T 13, CCR, 2260, 2261, 2262, 2263, 2264, 2265, 2266, 2270, 2271, and 2273 06/14/07 Approved 75 FR 26653 (5/12/10)

Cleaner Fuels in Ocean

- Going Vessel Main Engines and Auxiliary Boiler. T 13, CCR, 2299.2 and T 17, CCR, section 93118.2 07/24/08 U.S. Secretary of State has accepted the designation by the International Maritime Organization of an Emission Cont rol Area (ECA) in the waters off the North American coasts. Under this designation, ships are required to meet tighter fuel and emissions standards. Within the North American ECA, first

- phase fuel sulfur standard (August 2012), second phase (January 2015), and NOx after treatment requirements (2016). Under the terms of CARB’s regulation, the requirements set forth therein shall remain in effect until the CARB Executive Order issues written findings that federal requirements are in place that will achieve eq uivalent emissions reduction within the Regulated California Waters and are being enforced within the Regulated California Waters. 13 CCR, section 2299.2(j)(1).

Ocean

- Going Vessels (OGV) W ithin California Waters and 24 Nautical Miles of the California Baseline

. T 13, CCR, 2299.3; T 17, CCR, 93118.3. 6/23/11 Adjusts the offshore regulatory boundary; facilitates successful transition to very low sulfur fuels by aligning implementation dates more closely with recently approved federal requirements; See above comment in 7/24/08 OGV measure regarding North American ECA.

### 46 

### Table A

- 2 Fuel Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Heari ng Date 1 Comments

California Reformulated Gasoline Regulations

. T 13, CCR, Repeal section 2258, and amend sections 2260, 2261, 2264, 2265 2265.1, 2266, 2266.5, and 2271. 10/20/11 See staff report. No additional reductions expected.

Gasoline and Diesel F uel Test Methods . T 13, CCR, 2262, 2263, 2282. 1/25/13 Additional test methods

Alternative Fuel Conversion Certification Procedures . T 13, CCR, 2030, 2031. 9/26/13 Administr ative and procedural changes. Impact on emissions will depend on sales of vehicle conversions of cleaner versus the same emission standards. This measure has not yet been approved by the State of CA’s Office of Administrative Law (OAL).

### 47



## A

- 3. State On

- Road Mobile Sources Measures

Table A

- 3 lists measures adopted by CARB since 1990 for on

- road sources.

Table A

- 3 On

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Certification Pro cedure for Aftermarket Parts. VC 27156 & 38391 02/08/90 Compliance provisions

Emission Standards for Medium Duty Vehicles. T 13, CCR, 1900, 1956.8, 1960.1, 1968.1, 2061, 2112, 2139 06/14/90 Waiver granted September 16, 1994 (59 FR 48625 (9/22/94))

Evapor ative Emission Standards. T 13, CCR, 1976 08/09/90 Waiver granted August 25, 1994 (59 FR 46979 (9/13/94))
Low Emission Vehicles and Clean Fuels. T 13, CCR, 1900, 1904, 1956.8, 1960.1, 1960.1.5, 1960.5 and 2111, 2112, 2125, and 2139, 2061. 09/28/90 Waivers granted January 7, 1993 & April 6, 1998 (58 FR 4166 (1/13/93) & 63 FR 18403 (4/15/98))

Heavy Duty Diesel Smoke Emission Testing. T 13, CCR, 2180

- 2187 11/08/90 Inspection program

Onboard Diagnostics for Light

- Duty Trucks and Light & Medium

Duty Motor Ve hicles. T 13, CCR, 1977, 1968.1 09/12/91 Waiver granted October 2, 1996 (61 FR 53371, 10/11/96) Onboard Diagnostic, Phase II. T 13, CCR, 1968.1, 1977 11/12/91
Low Emission Vehicles amendments revising reactivity adjustment factor (RAF) provisions and ad opting a RAF for M85 transitional low emission vehicles. T 13, CCR, 1960.1 11/14/91 Confirm within the scope finding requested February 18, 1993

Alternative Motor Vehicle Fuel Certification Fuel Specification. T 13 & 26, CCR, 2290

- 2292.7, 1960.1(k), 1956. 8(b), 1956.8(d) 3/12/92 Confirm within the scope finding requested February 17, 1994

Standards and Test Procedures for Alternative Fuel Retrofit Systems. T 13, CCR, 2030, 2031 05/14/92 Compliance provisions

Phase 2 RFG certification fuel specifications. T 13, CCR, 1960.1, 1956.8(d) 08/13/92 Confirm within the scope finding requested February 17, 1994
Substitute Fuel or Clean Fuel Incorporated Test Procedures. T 13, CCR, 1960.1(k), 2317 11/12/92 Confirm within the scope finding requested February 17, 1994

Smoke Self Inspection Program for Heavy Duty Diesel & Gasoline Engines. T 13, CCR, 2190

- 2194, 2180

- 2187, 1956.8(b) 12/10/92 Inspection program

Certification Requirements for Low Emission Passenger Cars, Light

- Duty Trucks & Medium Duty Vehicles. T 13, CC R, 1960.1, 1976, 2061, 1900 01/14/93 Confirm within the scope finding requested February 21, 1994

Onboard Diagnostic, Phase II. T 13, CCR, 1968.1 07/09/93 Waiver granted October 2, 1996 (61 FR 53371, 10/11/96)

### 48 

### Table A

- 3 On

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Urban Transit Buses. T 13, CCR, 1956.8, 1965 , 2112 06/10/93 Found within the scope September 28, 2004 (69 FR 59920, October 6, 2004)

Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures. T 13, CCR, 1976 02/10/94 Waiver granted July 28, 1999 (64 FR 42689, 8/5/99)
Diesel Fuel Certification. T 13, CCR, 1956.8(b)&(d), 1960.1(k), 2292.6 09/22/94 Confirm within the scope finding requested September 14, 1995
Self Inspection Program for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines. T 13, CCR, 2190

- 2194, 2180

- 2187, 1956.8(b) 11/09/94 Inspection program

Onboard Diagnostics, Ph ase II. T 13, CCR,1963.1, & Certification Procedures 12/08/94 Waiver granted October 2, 1996 (61 FR 53371, 10/11/96)
Periodic Smoke Inspection Program. T 13, CCR, 2190 12/08/94 Inspection program
Heavy Duty Vehicle Exhaust Emission Standards. T 13, CCR, 1956.8 and incorporate test procedures. 06/29/95 Found within the scope September 28, 2004 (69 FR 59920, 10/6/04)

Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery Standards. T 13, CCR, 1976, 1978 and incorporate test procedures 06/29/95 Waiver granted August 13, 2002 (67 FR 54180, 8/21/02)

Retrofit Emission Standards. T 13, CCR, 1956.9, 2030, 2031, and incorporate test procedures 07/27/95 Compliance provision

Low Emission Vehicle Standards 3 (LEV 3). T 13, CCR, 1956.8, 1960.1, 1965, 2101, 2061, 2062, and incorporate tes t procedures 09/28/95 Confirm within the scope finding requested October 8, 1996.

Postpone Zero Emission Vehicle Requirements. T 13, CCR, 1900, 1960.1, 1976 03/28/96 Found within the scope January 18, 2001 (66 FR 7751, 1/25/01)

Diesel Fuel Certification Test Methods. T 13, CCR, 1956.8(b), 1960.1(k), 2281(c), 2282(b), (c) and (g) 10/24/96 Confirm within the scope finding requested November 24, 1997
Onboard Diagnostics, Phase II, Technical Status. T 13, CCR, 1968.1, 2030, 2031 12/12/96 Initial notice 69 FR 5542 (February 5, 2004)
Postpone Enhanced Evaporative Emission Requirements for Ultra

Small Volume Vehicle Manufacturers. T 13, CCR, 1976 and incorporate test procedures 05/22/97 Found within the scope July 28, 1999 (64 FR 42689 (8/5/99))

Off

- Cycle Emis sions Supplemental Federal Test Procedures (SFTPs). T 13, CCR, 1960.1, 2101 and incorporate test procedures 07/24/97 Waiver granted September 30, 2004 (69 FR 60996, 10/14/04)

Heavy Duty Vehicle Smoke Inspection Program/Periodic Smoke Inspection Program. T 13, CCR, 2180

- 2188 and 2190

- 2194 12/11/97 Inspection program

Heavy Duty Vehicle Regulations: 2004 Standards. T 13, CCR, 1956.8, 1965, 2036, 2112 and test procedures 04/23/98 Confirm within the scope finding requested December 26, 2001

### 49 

### Table A

- 3 On

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Low Emission Vehic les Standards (LEV 2) and Compliance Assurance Program (CAP 2000). T 13, CCR,1961 & 1962 (both new); 1900, 1960.1, 1965, 1968.1, 1976, 1978, 2037, 2038, 2062, 2101, 2106, 2107, 2110, 2112, 2114, 2119, 2130, 2137

- 2140, 2143

- 2148 11/05/98 Waiver granted Apri l 11, 2003 (68 FR 19811 (4/22/03))/found within the scope (1999 ZEV amendments) December 21, 2006 (71 FR 78190 (12/28/06))

Exhaust Standards for (On

- Road) Motorcycles. T 13, CCR, 1958 12/10/98 Waiver granted July 27, 2006 (71 FR 44027, 8/3/06)

Voluntary Accelerated Light Duty Vehicle Retirement Regulations. T 13, CCR, 2600

- 2610 12/10/98 Establishes standards for a voluntary accelerated retirement program. Revised 2/21/06 and 12/7/06

Clean Fuels Regulation Requirements. T 13, CCR, sections 2300

- 2317, and 2303.5, 2311.5 07/22/99 Removal of obsolete provisions, streamlining and other minor changes to 9/1990 rule.

Transit Bus Standards. T 13, CCR, 1956.1, 1956.2, 1956.3, 1956.4, 1956.8, 1965 02/24/00 Waiver granted for LDV & HDV July 15, 2013 (78 FR 44112, J uly 23, 2013). Combination of fleet requirements, emission standards, and zero

- emission bus standards. Federal & state emission standards are the same for 2010 MY buses.

Light

- and Medium Duty Low Emission Vehicle Alignment with Federal Standards. Exhaust Emission Standards for Heavy Duty Gas Engines. T 13, CCR, 1956.8 &1961 12/07/00 Waiver granted for LDV & HDV April 11, 2003 (68 FR 19811, 4/22/03). Initial notice on within

- the

- scope finding request for HDGE: 72 FR 27114 (5/14/07).
Heavy Duty Diesel Engin es "Not

- to

- Exceed (NTE)" Test Procedures. T 13 CCR, 1956.8, 2065 12/07/00 Confirm within the scope finding requested December 26, 2001.

Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation Update. T 13, CCR, 1900, 1960.1(k), 1961, 1962 & incorporated Test Procedure 01/25/01 Found within the scope finding and waiver granted on December 21, 2006 (71 FR 78190, 12/28/06)

Zero Emission Vehicle Infrastructure and Standardization of Electric Vehicle Charging Equipment. T 13, CCR, 1900(b), 1962(b) 1962.1 06/28/01 Found within the s cope and waiver granted on December 21, 2006 (71 FR 78190, 12/28/06)

Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Standards for 2007 and Later. T 13, CCR, 1956.8 and incorporate test procedures 10/25/01 Waiver granted August 19, 2005 (70 FR 50322, 8/26/05)

Low Emission Vehi cle Regulations. T 13, CCR, 1960.1,1960.5, 1961, 1962 and incorporate test procedures and guidelines 11/15/01 Found within the scope April 21, 2005 (70 FR 22034, 4/28/05)

California Motor Vehicle Service Information Rule. T 13&17, CCR, 1969 & 60060.1

- 60 060.7 12/13/01 Compliance provision. Very similar to EPA regulations at 40 CFR 86.1808.01

### 50 

### Table A

- 3 On

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Voluntary Accelerated Light Duty Vehicle Retirement Regulations. T 13, CCR, 2601

- 2605, 2606 & appendices C & D, and 2607

- 2610 02/21/02 Establishes standards for a vo luntary accelerated retirement program. Revised 12/7/06.

On

- Board Diagnostic II Review Amendments. T 13, CCR, 1968.1, 1968.2, 1968.5 04/25/02 Initial notice 69 FR 5542 (2/5/04)

Diesel Retrofit Verification Procedure, Warranty and In

- Use Compliance Requir ements. T 13, CCR, 2700

- 2710 05/16/02 Procedures to verify diesel retrofit technology.

Revision to Transit Bus Regulations Amendments. Public Transit Fleet Rule and Emission Standards for New U rban Buses

. T 13, CCR, 1956.1, 1956.2, 1956.4,1956.8, and 2112, & documents incorporated by reference 10/24/02 Waiver granted for LDV & HDV July 15, 2013 (78 FR 44112, July 23, 2013). Slight relaxation in requirements over 2000 rule.

Low Emission Vehicle s II. Align Heavy Duty Gas Engine Standards with Federal Standards; minor administrative changes. T 13, CCR, 1961, 1965, 1956.8, 1956.1, 1978, 2065 and documents incorporated by reference 12/12/02 Waiver granted August 19, 2005 (70 FR 50322 (8/26/05)) for all but HDGE. HDGE standards adopted to harmonize with EPA’s. Initial notice on within

- the

scope finding request for HDGE: 72 FR 27114 (5/14/07).

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Diesel Particulate from School Bus Idling. T13, CCR, 2480 12/12/02 No emis sions reductions claimed.

Zero Emission Vehicle Amendments for 2003. T 13, CCR, 1960.1(k), 1961(a) and (d), 1900, 1962, and documents incorporated by reference 03/25/03 Found within the scope and waiver granted on December 21, 2005 (71 FR 78190, 12/28/06)

Solid Waste Collection Vehicles. T 13, CCR, 2020, 2021, 2021.1, 2021.2 09/24/03 Diesel reduction program. Minimal reductions. See CARB, “Staff Report: Initial Statement Of Reasons, Proposed Diesel Particulate Matter Control Measure for On

- Road Heavy

- Duty Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Collection Vehicles,” June 6, 2003, p. 53.
Diesel Retrofit Verification Procedure, Warranty and In

- Use Compliance Requirements (Amendments). T 13, CCR, 2701

- 2707 & 2709 12/11/03 Procedures to verify diesel retrofit technology.

CA Motor Vehicle Service Information Rule. T 13, CCR, 1969 01/22/04 Compliance provision. Very similar to EPA regulations at 40 CFR 86.1808.01

Heavy Duty Diesel Engine

- Chip Reflash. T 13, CCR, 2011, 2180.1, 2181, 2184, 2185, 2186, 2192, and 2194 03/27/04 Compliance provision.

Engine Manufacturer Diagnostic System Requirements for 2007 and Subsequent Model Heavy Duty Engines. T 13, CCR, 1971 05/20/04 Waiver granted December 22, 2005 (71 FR 335, 1/4/06)

### 51 

### Table A

- 3 On

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Urban Bus Engines/Fleet Rule for Trans it Agencies. T 13, CCR, 1956.1, 1956.2, 1956.3, and 1956.4 06/24/04 Waiver granted for LDV & HDV 7/15/13 (78 FR 44112, 7/23/13). Added optional exhaust emission standards for diesel

fueled hybrid

- electric urban bus engines for authorized transit agencies with NO X mitigation plans for the 2004

– 2006 model years.

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Diesel Particulate from Diesel Fueled Commercial Vehicle Idling. T 13, CCR, 2485 07/22/04 CARB has requested that EPA confirm requirement is not preempted. Initial notice 75 FR 43975 (7/27/10)
Greenhouse Gas Standards. T 13, CCR, 1900, 1961 and Incorporated Test Procedures 09/23/04 Waiver granted 6/30/09 (74 FR 32744, 7/8/09)

Transit Fleet Rule. T 13, CCR, 2023, 2023.1, 2023.2, 2023.3, 2023.4, 1956.1, 2020, 2021, repeal 1956.2, 1956.3, 1956.4 02/24/05 Waiver granted for LDV & HDV 7/15/13 (78 FR 44112, 7/23/13). Diesel reduction program. Clarified the optional standards for hybrid

- electric buses that were allowed in the 2004 rulemaking.

On

- Board Diagnostic System Requirements for 2010 and Subsequent Model

- Year Heavy

- Duty Engines (HD OBD). T 13, CCR, 1971.1 07/21/05 Waiver granted 8/13/08 (73 FR 52042, 9/8/08)

2007

- 2009 Model

- Year Heavy Duty Urban Bus Engines and the Fleet Rule for Transit Agencies. T 13, CCR, 195 6.1, 1956.2, and 1956.8 10/20/05 Waiver granted for LDV & HDV 7/15/13 (78 FR 44112, 7/23/13). Aligns State emission standards with federal emission standards for heavy

- duty diesel engines.
Requirements to Reduce Idling Emissions from New and In

- Use Truck s, Beginning in 2008. T 13, CCR section 1956.8 and the incorporated document 10/20/05 Waiver granted on 2/8/12 (77 FR 9239, 2/16/12).

Diesel Particulate Matter Control Measure for On

- Road Heavy

Duty Diesel

- Fueled Vehicles Owned or Operated by Public Agenc ies and Utilities. T 13, CCR, 2022 and 2022.1 12/08/05 Diesel reduction program. Minimal reductions. See CARB, “Staff Report: Initial Statement Of Reasons, Proposed Diesel Particulate Matter Control Measure for On

- Road Heavy

- Duty Diesel

- Fueled Vehicles Own ed or Operated By Public Agencies And Utilities,” 10/ 21/05, p. 55.

Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment at Ports and Intermodal Rail Yards. T 13, CCR, 2479 12/08/05 Waiver (and authorization) granted on 11/28/11 (77 FR 9916, 2/21/12)).

AB 1009 Heavy

- Duty Vehi cle Smoke Inspection Program. T 13, CCR, 2180, 2180.1, 2181, 2182, 2183, 2184, 2185, 2186, 2187, and 2188, 2189 01/26/06 Requires trucks have emission control labels.

Diesel Verification Procedure, Warranty & In

- Use. T 13, CCR, 2702, 2703, 2704, 2706, 270 7, and 2709. 03/23/06 Procedures to verify diesel retrofit technology, supporting rule for in

- use control measures.

### 52 

### Table A

- 3 On

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Technical Amendments to Evaporative Exhaust and Evaporative Emissions Test Procedures. T 13, CCR, 1961,1976 and 1978. 05/25/06 Within the s cope finding 7/22/10 (75 FR 44948, 7/27/10).

California Motor Vehicle Service Information Rule. T 13, CCR, 1969 and incorporated documents 06/22/06 Compliance provision. Very similar to EPA regulations at 40 CFR 86.1808.01

Evaporative and Exhaust Emissions Test Procedures

. T 13, CCR, 1961, 1976, and 1978 06/22/06 Waiver granted 7/27/10 (75 FR 44951, 7/30/10).

On

- Board Diagnostic II. T 13, CCR, 1968.2, 1968.5, 2035, 2037 and 2038 09/28/06 ARB request sent to EPA on 1/22/08

Heavy

- Duty In

- Use Compliance Regulation. T 13, CCR, 1956.1, 1956.8, and documents incorporated by reference 09/28/06 Compliance provision. Compliance program "essentially identical to EPA's." See Updated Information Dige st for the Rule.

Zero Emission Bus Regulation. T13, CCR, 2023.1, 2023.3, & 2023.4 10/19/06 Delays ZEB requirements due to high bus costs and unproven durability, reliability and ability to produce the number of buses required by the regulation. See Update d Information Digest.
Voluntary Accelerated Retirement Regulation. T 13, CCR, 2601

- 2610 and appendices A

- D 12/07/06 Establishes standards for a voluntary accelerated retirement program.

Aftermarket (New) Catalytic Converters and Used Catalytic Converters. T 13, CCR, 2222 10/25/07 Establishes more stringent emissions performance and durability requirements for new aftermarket converters offered for sale in CA, and eliminates current pro visions allowing the sale and use of used catalytic converters in CA. ARB has indicated this falls under CAA 209(c) because of a preexisting waiver.
Heavy

- Duty Diesel In

- Use Compliance ~ Gaseous Pollutant Measurement . T 13, CCR, 1956.8 12/06/07 Modifies the measurement allowances during compliance testing.

In

- Use On

- Road Diesel

- Fueled Heavy

- Duty Drayage Trucks . T 13, CCR, 2027. 12/06/07 77 FR 20308 (4/4/12).

Verification Procedure, Warranty and In

- Use Compliance to Control Emissions from Diesel Engines . T 13, CCR, 2700

- 2710 1/24/08 Impro ves verification process and better support ARB’s in

- use fleet rules.
Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation . (Six parts) T 13, CCR, 1900, 1962, and California Exhaust Emission Standards an d Test Procedures. 3/27/08 Waiver granted 9/26/11 (76 FR 61098, 10/3/11)).

### 53 

### Table A

- 3 On

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Air Quality Improvement Program For the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle and Technology Progr am . T 13, CCR, 2340

- 2345. 9/25/08 Ensures that both the Air Quality Improvement Program and the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program complement existing air quality programs and maintain or improve upon the emission benefits achie ved.
Truck / Bus Regulation 2008

. T 13, CCR, 2025, 2020 and 2022, 2451

- 2453, 2455, 2456, 2458, 2461, and 2462. 12/11/08 Revised 12/16/10. Revised version approved at 77 FR 20308 (4/4/12).
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Heavy

- Duty Vehicles (Tractor

Trailers) . T 17, CCR, 95300

- 95311. 12/11 /08 Waiver granted 7/30/14 (7 9 FR 46256, 8 / 7 /1 4 )

Aftermarket Critical Emission Control Parts on Highway Motorcycles

. T 13, CCR, 2222 1/22/09 Amendments allow manufacturers to sell, off er for sale, advertise, or install aftermarket emission control parts for highway motorcycles.

Plug

- In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Test Procedure Amendments and Aftermarket Parts Certification Requirements . T 13, CCR, 1961, 1962, 1976, and 1978, and California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures 5/28/09 Amendments to adapt existing exhaust and evaporative emission test procedures to more accurately reflect the exhaust and evaporati ve emissions generated from new configurations of plug

- in hybrid electric vehicles.

Air Quality Improvement Program 4/23/09 Guidelines for Air Quality Improvement Program to fund air qual ity improvement projects (AB 118)

Heavy

- Duty On

- Board Diagnostics . T 13, CCR, 1968 and 1971 5/28/09 Waiver granted 11/29/12 (77 FR 73459, 12/10/12)

Enhanced Fleet Modernization Program (Car Scrap) (formerly “Expanded Vehicle Retirement Program”). T 13, CCR, 2620

- 2630 6/26/09 Expands CA’s existing vehicle retirement program to improve CA’s air quality through t he voluntary early retirement of vehicles in the South Coast and San Joaquin Valley.

New Passenger Motor Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards . T 13, CCR, 1961 and 1961.1, and the C alifornia Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light

- Duty Trucks, and Medium

- Duty Vehicles. 9/24/09 Allows manufacturers to meet the fleet average GHG emission requirements by pooling the CA and CAA S ec. 177 State Vehicle sales; allows use of data from the federal CAFE program to demonstrate compliance with CA’s new passenger motor vehicle GHG regulations; administrative amendments to align with current federal requirements.
Emission Warranty Information Reporting and Recall Regulations

. T 13, CCR, 1956.8, 1958, 1961, 1976, 1978, 2111, 2112, 2122, 2136, and 2141, and related test procedures. 11/19/09 Repeal 2007 Emission Warran ty Information Reporting and Recall (EWIR) amendments and readopt 1998 version of the EWIR regulation. Verification Procedure, Warranty and In

- Use Compliance Requirements for In

- Us e Strategies to Control Emissions from Diesel Engines . T 13, CCR, 2700

- 2707, and 2711. 1/28/10 Amendments to improve the verification process.

### 54 

### Table A

- 3 On

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

New Passenger Motor Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards . T 13, CCR, 1961 and 1961.1, and amendments to the CA Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures 2/25/10 Allows manufacturer compliance with EPA standards to be deemed as compliant with CA’s standards for the 2012 through 2016 MYs.

Periodic Smoke Inspection Program . T 13, CCR, 2190 10/21/10 Eliminates duplicative emissions testing requiremen ts for owners of diesel fleet vehicles that operate in CA. Truck and Bus Regulation 2010 . (Includes three parts: Truck and Bus regulation, Tractor

- Trailer GHG regulation, and the Drayage Truck regulation.) T 13, CCR, 2025; T17, CCR, 95300

- 95311; T13, CCR, 2027. 12/16/10 Approved 77 FR 20308 (4/4/12). For portions of the measure a w aiver was granted on 7/30/14 and published at 7 9 FR 46256 (8 / 7 /1 4 )

. Low Carbon Fuel Standard Intensity Lookup Tables . T 17, CCR, 95486. 2/24/11 Amends the LCFS carbon intensity Lookup Tables through the adoption of 28 additional fuel pathways.
Heavy

- Duty Diesel In

- Use Compliance Regulation . T 13, CCR, 1956 and CA Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures. 6/23/11 PM measurement allowance to compensate for uncertainties when performing compliance testing.

Mobile Cargo Handling . T 13, CCR, 2479 9/22/11 Waiver request submitted by CARB on 5/16/13. Provides additional flexibility to CHE owners/ operators in complying with requirements by reducing

c ompliance costs while continuing to reduce emissions of diesel PM and NOx.

Specially Constructed Vehicles (Kit Cars)

. T 13, CCR, 2210

- 2218. 11/17/11 New regulation and associated certific ation procedures for new light

duty engines for use in specially constructed vehicles.

Low Carbon Fuel Standard . T 17, CCR, 95480

- 95482, 95484

- 95486, 95488, and 95490 12/16/11 Refines and improves certain aspects of the regulation; vast majority of the regulation remains unchanged. Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation
, Low

- Emission Vehicle and GHG 2012 ( Advanced Clean Cars Program) . T 13, CCR, 1900, 1956, 1960

- 1962, 1965, 1968, 1976, 1978, 2037, 2038, 2062, 2112, 2139, 2140, 2145, 2147, 2235, 2300, 2302

- 2304, 2306

- 2318. 1/27/12 Waiver gran ted 12/27/12 (78 FR 2112, January 9, 2013).

Heavy

- Duty OBD and OBD II Regulation . T 13, CCR, 1968 and 1971 8/23/12 Waiver request submitted by CARB on February 14, 2014. Amends monitori ng and performance requirements of OBD II systems in diesel fueled medium

- duty vehicles, the monitoring and performance requirements of HD OBD systems, and the enforcement provisions applicable to OBD II systems and HD OBD systems
Verification Procedures Regulation . T 13, CCR, 2700

- 2711. 8/23/12 Reduces the amount of in

- use testing.

Emergency Regulation for Tract or Trailer Greenhouse Gas Regulation . T 17, CCR, 95300

- 95312 N/A Corrects an oversight that required registration and compliance deadlines that preceded effective date of the rule.

### 55 

### Table A

- 3 On

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

LEV III GHG and ZEV Regulation Amendments for Federal Compliance Option . T 13, CCR, 1900, 1956, 1960

- 1962, and 1976 11/15/12 Amendments to new passenger motor vehicle GHG emission standards for MY 2017

- 2025 to permit compliance based on federal GHG em ission standards and additional minor revisions to the LEV III and ZEV regulations. Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation

. T 13, CCR, 1962 and California Exhaust Emissions Standards and Test Procedures. 10/24/13 Minor amendments

Heavy Duty GHG Phase 1 . (Five parts: GHG Regulations for Medium

- and Heavy

- Duty Engines and Vehicles; Optional Reduced Emission Standards for Heavy

- Duty Engines; and amendments to the Tractor

- Trailer GHG Regulation, the Diesel

- Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling Rule, and the Heavy

- Duty Hybrid

- Electric Vehicles Certification Procedures.) T 13, CCR, 1900, 1956, 2036, 2037, 2112, 2139, 2140, and 2147; T17, CCR, 95660

- 95664, and California Exhaust Emissions Standards and Test Procedures. 12/12/13 All related to on

- road medium

- and heavy

- duty vehicles and engines; intended to help usher in new generations of lower

- emitting trucks, to enhance th e enforcement and implementation of existing requirements, and to establish new, optional provisions. This measure has not yet been approved by OAL.

### 56



## A

- 4. State Off

- Road Mobile Sources Measures

Table A

- 4 lists measures adopted by CARB since 1990 for off

- road sources.

Table A

- 4 Off

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Emission Standards for Utility and Lawn and Garden Engines. T 17, CCR, 2400 et. seq. 12/13/90 Authoriz ation granted July 5, 1995 (60 FR 37440, 7/20/95) 1

- year Implementation Delay in Emission Standards for Utility Engines. T 13, CCR, 2400, 2403

- 2407 04/08/93

Heavy Duty Diesel Cycle Engines. T 13, CCR, 2420

- 2427 01/09/92 Authorization granted May 15, 19 95 (60 FR 48981, 9/21/1995)

Off

- Highway Recreational Vehicles. T 13, CCR, 2410

- 2414, 2111

- 2140 01/03/94 Authorization granted December 23, 1996 (61 FR 69093, 12/31/1996)
Utility and Lawn and Garden Equipment Engines. T 13, CCR, 2403(c), 11(a)(1)(I)(ii), 4(a)(1)(I)(ii) 07/28/94 Within the scope finding November 9, 2000 (65 FR 69763, 11/20/00)
Exemption of Military Tactical Vehicles. T 13, CCR, 1905, 2400, 2420 12/14/95 Within the scope finding November 9, 2000 (65 FR 69763, 11/20/00)

Utility and Lawn and Garden Equipment Engines. CO Standards 1/25/96 Within the scope finding November 9, 2000 (65 FR 69763, 11/20/00)

Wintertime Requirements for Utility Engines & Off

- Highway Vehicles. T 13, CCR, 2403 09/26/96 Within the scope finding November 9, 2000 (65 FR 69763, 11/20/00)

Portable Equipment Registration Program. T 13, CCR, 2450

- 2465 03/27/97 Revised on 12/10/98. Waiver request withdrawn/replaced.

Small Off

- Road Engines (SORE). T 13, CCR, 2400, 2410

- 2414 03/26/98 Within the scope finding 11/9/00 (65 FR 6 9767, 11/20/00), Authorization granted (durability requirements), 10/10/03 (65 FR 65702, 11/21/03).

Large Off

- Road Spark

- Ignition Engine Regulations. T 13, CCR, 2430 et seq., and 2411

- 2414 10/22/98 Authorization granted 5/15/06 (71 FR 29623, 5/23/06)

19 97 & Later Model Off

- Highway Recreational Vehicles and Engines. T 13, CCR, 2410

- 2414, 2415 12/10/98 Authorization granted 1/27/14 (79 FR 6584, 2/4/14)

Revisions to Statewide Portable Equipment Registration Program. T 13, CCR, 2450

- 2463 12/10/98 Superseded on 2/26/04.

Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 Marine Engines. T 13, CCR, 2440 et seq 12/10/98 Authorization granted 3/22/07 (59 FR 14546, 3/28/07)

### 57 

### Table A

- 4 Off

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Aftermarket Parts for Off

- Road Engines. T 13, CCR, 2470

- 2476 11/19/98 Compliance measure

P ortable Container Spillage Control Measure. T 13, CCR, 2470

- 2478 09/23/99 Similar federal regulation. 40 CFR part 59, subpart F.

Off

- Road Compression Ignition Engines. T 13, CCR, 2111, 2112, 2137, 2139, 2140, 2141, 2144, 2400, 2401, 2403, 2420, 2421, 2423

- 2427, & appendix A to article 2.1. 01/27/00 Authorization granted, 2/5/10 (75 FR 8056, 2/23/2010)

Marine Inboard Engines. T 13, CCR, 2111, 2112, 2139, 2140, 2147, 2440

- 2442, 2443.1

- 2443.3, 2444, 2445.1, 2445.2, 2446, 2444.2 and incorporation of documents by reference 07/26/01 Authorization granted in part 3/22/07 (59 FR 14546, 3/28/07)) 2007 standards waiver granted 4/26/11 (76 FR 24872, 5/3/11)

Off

- Highway Recreation Vehicles. T13, CCR, 2415 07/24/03 Authorization granted 1/27/14 (79 FR 6584, 2/4/14).

Small Off

- Road Engines (SORE). T 13, CCR, 2400

- 2409, 2405.1, 2405.2, 2405.3, 2750

- 2754, 2754.1, 2754.2, 2755

- 2767, 2767.1, 2768

- 2773 and the documents incorporated by reference 09/25/03 Authorization granted, 12/11/06 (71 FR 75536, 12/15/06)

Airborne Tox ic Control Measure for Diesel Particulate for Transport Refrigeration Units. T 13, CCR, 2022 & 2477 12/11/03 Authorization granted (non

- road) 1/9/09 (74 FR 3030, 1/16/09)

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Diesel

- Fueled Portable Engines. T 17, CCR,93116, 93116.1, 93116.2, 93116.3, 93116.4, and 93116.5 02/26/04 Authorization granted on 11/29/12 (77 FR 72846, 12/6/12).

Modifications to the Statewide Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP) Regulations. T 13, CCR Amendments to 2450

- 2465, and repeal of 2466 02/26/04 Superseded on 6/22/06 and 3/22/07.

Off

- Road Compression Ignition Engines. T 13, CCR, 2420, 2421, 2423, 2424, 2425, 2427 12/09/04 Authorization granted 2/5/10 (75 FR 8056, 2/23/10)

Portable Fuel Containers (PFC) [Part 1 of 2]. T 13, CCR, 24 67 and 2467.1 09/15/05 Similar federal regulation. 40 CFR part 59, subpart F.

Portable Fuel Containers (PFC) [Part 2 of 2]. T 13, CCR 2467.2, 2467.3, 2467.4, 2467.5, 2467.6, 2467.7; repeal of 2467.8, and adoption of new 2467.8 and 2467.9. 09/15/05 Simil ar federal regulation. 40 CFR part 59, subpart F.

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Cruise Ships Onboard Incineration. T 17, CCR, 93119 11/17/05 See Initial Statement of Reasons for Rule, p. II

- 1.

### 58 

### Table A

- 4 Off

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Marine Inboard Sterndrive Engines. T 13 CCR 2111, 2112, 2441, 2442, 2444.2, 2445.1, 2446, 2447, and incorporated document 11/17/05 Revision to year 2007 standards in 7/26/2001 marine inboard engine standards. Waiver requested by CARB on 2/7/08. No impact on reductions after 2020.

Auxiliary Diesel Engines and Diesel

- Electric Engines Operated on Ocean

- Going Vessels within California Waters and 24 Nautical Miles of the California Baseline. T 13, CCR, 2299.1 and T 17, CCR, 93118 12/08/05 In Pacific Merchant Shipping Assciation v. Goldstene , 517 F.3d 1108, 1109

– 10 (9th Cir. 2008), the Ninth Circuit enjoined California from enforcing this measure. The measure adopted on 07/24/08.

Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment at Ports and Intermodal Rail Yards. T 13, CCR, 2479 12/08/05 Authorization (and waiver) granted on 11/28/1 1 (77 FR 9916, 3/21/12).

Fork Lifts and Other Industrial Equipment. (Large Off

- Road Spark Ignition Engines > 1 liter) T 13, CCR 2430, 2433, 2434. Adopt 2775, 2775.1, 2775.2, 2780, 2781, 2783, 2784, 2785, 2786, 2787, 2788, and 2789. 05/26/06 Authorization granted on 3/29/12 (77 FR 20329, 4/4/12).

Portable Equipment Registration Program. T 13, CCR, 2450, 2451, 2452, 2453, 2454, 2455, 2456, 2457, 2458, 2459, 2460, 2461, 2462, 2463, 2464, and 2465 06/22/06 Superseded on 3/22/07.

Off

- Highway Recreational Veh icles and Engines. T 13, CCR, 2411

- 2413, 2415 & documents incorporated by reference 07/20/06 Authorization granted 1/27/14 (79 FR 6584 (2/4/14).

Emergency Regulation for Portable Equipment Registration Program Airborne Toxic Control Measures and Portable and Stationary diesel

- Fueled Engines. T 13, CCR, 2452, 2455, 2456, 2461; T17 CCR 93115, 93116.2, 93116.3 12/06/06 Expired.

Portable Equipment Registration Program and Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Diesel

- Fueled Portable Engines. T 13, CCR, 2451, 2452 , 2456, 2458, 2459, 2460, 2461, and 2462, T 17, CCR, 93116.1, 93116.2, 93116.3 , 93116.3.1 03/22/07 Authorization granted on 11/29/12 (77 FR 72851, 12/6/12).

In

- Use Off

- Road Diesel Vehicles. T 13, CCR, 2449 07/26/07 Superseded on 1/22/09

Commercial Harbo r Craft. T 13, CCR, section 2229.5 and T 17, CCR section 93118.5. 11/15/07 Authorization granted on 12/5/11 (77 FR 77521, 12/13/11)

Ocean

- Going Vessels At Berth (Shore Power). T 13, CCR, 2299.3 and T 17, CCR, 93118.3 and documents incorporated by referenc e 12/06/07 Authorization granted on 11/28/11 (77 FR 77515, 12/13/11)

### 59 

### Table A

- 4 Off

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Spark

- Ignition Marine Engine and Boat Regulations . T 13, CCR, 2111, 2112 (including Appendix A), 2139, 2147, 2440 , 2441, 2442, 2443.1, 2443.2, 2443.3, 2444.1, 2444.2, 2445, and the repeal of section 2448. 7/24/08 Notice of opportunity for public hearing and comment published on 8/19/13 (78 FR 50413).

Cleaner Fuels in Ocean

- Going Vessel Main Engines and Auxiliary Bo iler. T 13, CCR, 2299.2 and T 17, CCR, section 93118.2 07/24/08 U.S. Secretary of State has accepted the designation by the International Maritime Organization of an Emission Control Area (ECA) in the waters off the North American coasts. Under this design ation, ships are required to meet tighter fuel and emissions standards. Within the North American ECA, first

- phase fuel sulfur standard (August 2012), second phase (January 2015), and NOx after treatment requirements (2016). Under the terms of CARB’s regul ation, the requirements set forth therein shall remain in effect until the CARB Executive Order issues written findings that federal requirements are in place that will achieve equivalent emissions reduction within the Regulated California Waters and are b eing enforced within the Regulated California Waters. 13 CCR, section 2299.2(j)(1).
Portable Outboard Marine Tanks and Components

. T 13, CCR, Chapter 9, article 6.5, section 2468, and adoption of “CP

- 510 Certification Procedure for Portable Outboard Marine Tanks and Components”, “TP

- 511 Diurnal Rate from Portable Outboard Marine Tanks”, and “TP

- 512 Permeation Rate from Portable Outboard Marine Tank Fuel Hoses and Portable Outboard Mari ne Tank Primer Bulbs” 9/25/08 Requires permeation and evaporative technologies to reduce gasoline vapor emissions. Analogous federal requirement at 40 CFR 1060.105.

Large Spark Ignition Engines . T 13, CCR, 2433 and California Exhaust Emissions Standards and Test Procedures 11/21/08 Author ization request sent to EPA on 6 /2/2014. Amended regulations to include more stringent exhaust emission standards; new regulations to control evaporat ive emissions. CARB is preparing package to request authorization. Authorization previously granted for prior Large SI engines measure. See 05/26/06

measure.

### 60 

### Table A

- 4 Off

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Small Off Road Engine Regu lations

. T 13, CCR, 2403, 2405, 2406, 2408, and 2409, and California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures 11/21/08 Notice of opportunity for public hearing and comment published on 4/28/14 (79 FR 30610). Modifies SORE regulations to address emi ssion credits, etc.

Cleaner In

- Use Heavy

- Duty Trucks. T 13, CCR, 2025 12/11/08 Authorization granted on 5/16/13 (78 FR 31536, 5/24/13) for portion of rule that applies to in

- use nonroad yard trucks and auxiliary engines used in
two

- engine sweepers.

In

- Use Off

- Road Diesel Fueled Fleets . T 13, CCR, 2449, 2449.1, and 2449.2 1/22/09 Superseded on 7/23/09

In

- Use O ff

- Road Diesel Fueled Fleets . T 13, CCR, 2449, 2449.1, and 2449.2 7/23/09 Superseded on 12/16/10.
Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP), Portable Engine ATCM, and In

- Use Off

- Road Diesel

- Fueled Vehicles

. (Part 1) T 13, CCR, 2025, 2449, 2452, 2453, 2456, 2458, 2460, 2461 and 2462; T17, CCR, 93116; (Part 2) T 13, CCR, 2451, 2452, 2453, 2456, 2458, 2460

- 2462; T 17, CCR, 93116. 1/28/10 Operating extension for certain uncertified portable engines in small and medium fleets; revises the applicability of the regulations for water well drilling rigs; ... (more) Commercial Harbor Craft Operated Within California Waters and 24 Nautical Miles of the California Baseline 6/24/10 Authorization request sent to EPA on 5/28/2014. Authorization granted for prior harbor craft measure.
Transport Refrigeration Units . T 13, CCR, 2477 11/18/10 Authorization granted on 6/19/13 (see 78 FR 38970, 6/28/13) .

In

- Use Off

- Road Diesel

- Fueled Fleets . T 13, CCR, 2775 12/16/10 Authorization granted on 9/13/13 (78 FR 58090, 9/20/13).

Ocean

- Going Vessels Within California Waters and 24 Nautical Miles of the California Baseline

. T 13, CCR, 2299.3; T 17, CCR, 93118.3. 6/23/11 Adjusts the offshore regulatory boundary; facilitates successful transition to very low sulfur fuels by aligning implementation dates more closely with recently approved federal requirements; See above comment regarding North American ECA.

Mobile Cargo Handling . T 13, CCR, 2479 9/22/11 Notice of opportunity for public hearing and comment published on 4/28/14 (79 FR 30608). Provides additional flexibility to CHE owners/operators in complying with th e regulation’s requirements by reducing compliance costs while continuing to reduce emissions of diesel PM and NOx.

### 61 

### Table A

- 4 Off

- Road Mobile Source Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Transport Refrigeration Units . T 13, CCR, 2477 10/20/11 Provides MY 2001 through 2003 TRU engines that complied with applicable Low Emission TRU in

- use performance standards by specified time periods, a one or two year extension from the more stringent Ultra

- Low Emission TRU in

- use performance standards. Small Off

- Road Engine and Tier 4 Off

- Road Compression

Ignition Engine Regulations and Test Procedures; and, Amendments to the Exhaust Emission Certification Test Fuel for Off

- Road Spark

- Ignition En gines, Equipment, and Vehicles . T 13, CCR, 2403, 2404, 2407, 2412, 2421, 2423, 2424, 2425, 2425.1, 2426, 2427, 2433, 2447, 2783, 2784 and incorporated by reference various California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures. 12/16/11 The amendments provide better harmonization with federal certification and exhaust emission testing requirements for SORE and tier 4 ORCI engine regulations and associated test procedures.

Verif ication Procedures Regulation . T 13, CCR, 2700

- 2711 8/23/12 To reduce testing costs, reduces the amount of in

- use testing required.

Off

- Highway Recreational Vehicles

. T 13, CCR, 24 16

- 2419 and TP

- 933. 7/25/13 Adds OHRV test procedure and evaporative emissions standard. This measure has not yet been approved by CA’s OAL.

### 62



### A

- 5 . State Consumer Product Measures

California has been regulating the VOC content of consumer products for over 20 years and continues to tighten standards and regulate more products. Table A

- 5 is a list of CARB’s rulemaking actions on consumer products since 1990.

Table A

- 5 Consumer Products Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board 1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Antiperspirant/Deodorants. T 17, CCR, 94500

- 94506 11/09/89 Approved 8/21/95 (60 FR 43379)

Consumer Products BAAQMD. T 17, CCR, 94520

- 94526 06/14/90 Not applicable to the South Coast

area
Phase I

- Consumer Products. T 17, CCR, 94507

- 94517 10/11/90 Approved 8/21/95 (60 FR 43379)

Phase II

- Consumer Products. T 17, CCR, 94501, 94502, 94505, 94514, 94503.5, 94506, 94507

- 94513, 94515 01/09/92 Approved 8/21/95 (60 FR 43379)

Notice of General Public Interest for Consumer Pro ducts. T 17, CCR, 94507

- 94517 11/30/92 Not a control measure

Alternative Control Plan for Consumer Products. T 17, CCR, 94540

- 94555 09/22/94 Voluntary compliance option. No action.
Aerosol Coating Products and Alternative Control Plan. T 17, CCR, 94520

- 94528, 94540

- 94543, 94547. 03/23/95 Superseded by 6/22/00 rule.

Antiperspirants and Deodorants, Consumer Products, and Aerosol Coating Products. T 17, CCR, 94500

- 94506, 94508, 94521 09/28/95 Superseded by 6/24/04 rule for antiperspirants and deodorants; superseded by 11/17/06 rule for consumer products; superseded by 11/17/06 rule for aerosol coating products.

Antiperspirants and Deodorants, Consumer Products, Aerosol Coating Products (ARB Test Method 310). T 17, CCR, 94506(a), 94515(a), 94526 11/21/96 S uperseded by 6/24/04 rule for antiperspirants and deodorants; superseded by 11/17/16 rule for consumer products; superseded by 11/17/06 rule for aerosol coating products.
Consumer Products and Aerosol Coating Products Amendments. T 17, CCR, 94508

- 94515, 9 9517, 94321 11/21/96 Superseded by 11/17/06 rule

Consumer Products (Hair Spray) Amendments. T 17, CCR, 94509, 94513, 94514 03/27/97 Voluntary compliance option. No action.
Consumer Products (Mid

- Term Measures) Amendments. T 17, CCR, 94508, 94509, 94513 0 7/24/97 Superseded by 11/17/06 rule

Consumer Products (Hairspray Credit Program). T 17, CCR, 94502, 94509, 94522, & 94548 11/13/97 Voluntary compliance option. No action.

### 63 

### Table A

- 5 Consumer Products Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board 1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Consumer Products, Aerosol Coatings & Antiperspirants and Deodorants. T 17, CCR, 94 501, 94508, 94521, 94522, and 94524 11/19/98 Superseded by 11/17/06 rule

Consumer Products

- LVP

- VOC Definitions And Test Methods. T 17, CCR, 94506, 94506.5, 94508(a)(78), 94515 and 94526, and the amendment of CARB Method 310 11/19/98 Superseded by 6/24/0 4 rule for test method 310 and 11/17/06 rule for
rest.

California Consumer Products Regulation Mid

- Term Measures II. T 17, CCR, 94508, 94509, and 94513 10/28/99 Superseded by 11/17/06 rule

Consumer Products Aerosol Adhesives Control Measure. T 17, CCR, 9 4508, 94509, 94512, 94513 05/25/00 Superseded by 11/17/06 rule

Aerosol (Paint) Coatings Products. T 17, CCR, 94700, 94701, 94521

- 94524, 94526 06/22/00 Approved 9/13/05 70 FR 53920; superseded by 11/17/06 rule
Antiperspirant and Deodorant Regulations. T 1 7, CCR, 94502, 94504 10/26/00 Superseded by 6/24/04 rule

Revised Tables of Maximum Incremental Reactivity Values. T 1, CCR, 94700. 12/03/03 Approved 9/13/05 70 FR 53920; superseded by 11/17/06 rule

Consumer Products & Methods 310/ATCM for Para

Dicholorob enzene. T 17, CCR, 94501, 94506, 94507, 94508, 94509, 94510, 94512, 94513, 94515, and 94526, and CARB Method 310, which is incorporated by reference 06/24/04 Approved 11/4/09 (74 FR 57074)

Consumer Products. T 17, CCR, 94508, 94509, 94510, 94513 and 945 23 11/17/06 Approved 11/4/09 (74 FR 57074)

Consumer Products Regulation . T 17, CCR, 94508, 94509, 94510, 94512, 94513, and 94515 6/26/08 Approved 5/12/11 (76 FR 27613).

Consumer Products Regulation and Test Method 310 . T 17, CCR, 94508, 94509, 94510, 94512, 94513, and 94515, and amendments to ARB Method 310 9/24/09 Approved 2/13/12 (77 FR 7535)

Consumer Products Regulations . T 17, CCR, 94508, 94509, 94510, 94512, and 94515, and amendments to ARB Method 310 11/18/10 Amendments set new or lower VOC limits for various categories of consumer products

. Estimated 6.7 tpd VOC reduction statewide.

Consumer Products: Automotive Windshield Washer Fluid Products

. T 17, CCR, 94508 and 94509 10/18/12 Expands the areas where higher VOC
content ready

- to

- use Automotive Windshield Washer Fluid products may be sold. No emissions benefit.

### 64 

### Table A

- 5 Consumer Products Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board 1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Consumer Products . T 17, CCR, 94501, 94506, 94508

- 9, 94512

- 13, 94515, 94520

- 94526, 94528, 945 60

- 94575, and 94700, and amendments to ARB Method 310

. 9/26/13 Amendments to the following: regulations (i.e., Antiperspirants and Deodorants, Consumer Products, Aerosol Coating Products); Tables of MIR Values; Test Method 310; and proposed repeal of the H airspray Credit Program. This measure has not yet been submitted to OAL.

### 65



## A

- 6. State Vapor Recovery Measures

Under California State law (Health and Safety Code Sections 41954), CARB is required to adopt procedures and performance standards for contr olling gasoline emissions from gasoline marketing operations, including transfer and storage operations. State law also authorizes CARB, in cooperation with the districts, to certify vapor recovery systems, identify defective equipment, and develop test me thods. The installation and operation of CARB

- certified vapor recovery equipment is required and enforced by d istrict r ules. Table A

- 6 is a list of rulemaking actions taken by CARB since 1990 that address vapor recovery equipment certification, defects,

an d/or test methods.

Table A

- 6 Gasoline Vapor Recovery Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date Comments
Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems. T 17, CCR, 94010

- 94015, 94150

- 94160, 94000

- 94004, 94007. 06/29/95

C ARB sets requirements for and certifies vapor recovery equipment. District rules establish requirements for the installation of CARB

- certified equipment. See SCAQMD Rules 461 & 462 Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems. T 17, CCR, 94010

- 94015 and 94150, 94156, 94157, 94158, 94159, 94160, 94162 08/27/98

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems. T 17, CCR, 94011, 94153, 94155, and incorporated test procedures, CP

- 201, TP

- 201.4, and TP

- 201.6 06/24/99

Enhanced Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems (In Station Diagnostics and Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery). T 17, CCR, 94011 03/23/00

Enhanced Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems (Emergency Filing CP

- 201, section 18). T 17, CCR, 94011 03/23/00

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems Test Methods and Compliance Procedures. T 17, CCR, 94 010, 94011, 94153, 94155, 94163, 94164, 94165 & incorporated procedures 10/25/01

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems Defects. T 17, CCR, 94006 and incorporated document. 11/15/01

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems Test Procedures. T 17, CCR, 94010, 94011, 941 63, 94164, and 94165 and procedures incorporated by reference, and 94166, 94167, and incorporation by reference. 12/12/02

Unihose Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems. T17, CCR, 94011 07/22/04

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems at Dispensing Facilities. Emerge ncy Filing. T 17, CCR, 94011 07/22/04

Gasoline Vapor Recovery System Equipment Defects List. T 17, CCR, 94006(b) & incorporated document 08/24/04

### 66 

### Table A

- 6 Gasoline Vapor Recovery Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board

1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date Comments Enhanced Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems Extension. T 17, CCR, 94011 and certification procedure 11/18/04

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems. T 17 CCR 94011 and incorporated certification 06/22/06

Vapor Recovery Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST). T 17, CCR, 94010, 94011, 94016 and 94168 and incorporated documents 06/21/07

Gasoline Vapor Recovery System Equip ment Defects List. T 17, CCR, 94006 N/A

Vapor Recovery Defects List N/A

Vapor Recovery Certification and Test Procedu res . T 17, CCR, 94010, 94011, 94016, 94150, and 94168, and the incorporated D

– 200

- Definitions for Vapor Recovery Procedures, CP

– 201

- Certification Procedure for Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, and CP

- 206

- Vapor Recovery Certification Procedure 9/22/11

Vapor Recovery Equipment Defects List N/A

Vapor Recovery Systems at GDFs an d Cargo Tanks . T 17, CCR, 94011, 94014, and 94016 7/25/13

### 67



## A

- 7. State Rules that Do Not Address Ozone Precursors in the South Coast Nonattainment Area

A substantial number of the measures adopted by CARB since 1990 do not affect direct
ozone pr ecursor emissions in the S acramento nonattainment area. These types of measures include fee rules, identification of toxic air contaminants, area boundary designations, and controls for pollutants other than ozone precursors. Table A

- 7 provides a list of t hese measures.

Table A

- 7 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board That Do Not Address Ozone in the South Coast Nonattainment Area 1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments
Transported Pollutants (Ozone). T 17, CCR, 70500 12/04/89 Not an emissions reduction measure

Non

- vehicular Test Methods. T 17, CCR, 94002, 94003 17, &26, 94146

- 94149, 94132, 94135, 94139, 94140 01/11/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Test Method for Asbestos in Serpentine Aggregate. T 17, & 26, CCR, 94147, Method 435 04/12/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Asbestos in Surfacing Applications. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93106 04/12/90 Not an ozone precursor emissions reduction measure
Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90800.1, 90800, 90802

- 90803 05/10/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, & 26, CCR, 90700

- 90704, 93300

- 93347 05/10/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Dioxins Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Medi cal Waste Incinerators. T 17, CCR, 93104 07/12/90 Air toxics control measure

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Emissions Inventory Criteria and Guidelines. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93300

- 93347 06/14/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Criteria for Area Designations for t he State Ambient Air Quality Standard. T 17, CCR, 70303 & 70304 06/14/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Emissions Reduction Accounting Procedures for California Clean Air Act. T 17, CCR, 70700

- 70704 07/12/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Identif ication of Inorganic Arsenic as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 07/12/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Transport Mitigation Regulations. T 17, CCR, 70600

- 70601 08/09/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxic Fee Schedule & Emis sions Inventory Criteria and Guidelines. T 17, & 26, CCR, 90700

- 90704, 93300

- 93347 09/13/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Identification of Trichloroethylene as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 10/11/90 Not an emissions reduction measu re

Revision to Designation Criteria. T 17, CCR, 60200

- 60204, 60208 11/08/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Identification of Vinyl Chloride as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 11/13/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

### 68 

### Table A

- 7 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board That Do Not Address Ozone in the South Coast Nonattainment Area 1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Identification of Chloroform as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 12/13/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Conflict of Interest Code. T 17, CCR, 95001, et. seq. 12/13/90 Not an emissions reduction measure

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- Vehicular Sour ces. T 17, CCR, 90800.2, 90801, 90803 02/24/91 Not an emissions reduction measure

Non

- Vehicular Test Methods. T 17, CCR, 94131, 94132, 94142 04/11/91 Not an emissions reduction measure.

Acid Deposition Fee Regulations. T 17, CCR, 90621.2, 90620, 90622 04/11/91 Not an emissions reduction measure. Obsolete.
Administrative Hearing Procedures. T 17, CCR, 60075.1, 60075.47 05/09/91 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, & 26, CCR, 90700

- 90705 06/13/91 Not an emiss ions reduction measure

Agricultural Burning Guidelines. T 17, 80130, 80150, 80250, 80260, 80290 07/11/91 Not an emissions reduction measure

Identification of Metallic & Inorganic Nickel Compounds as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, 93000 08/08/91 Not an emissions reduction measure

State Ambient Air Quality Standard for SO 2 . T 17, CCR, 70100, 70200, 70201 10/10/91 Not an emissions reduction measure

Identification of Perchloroethylene as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 10/10/91 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 60200, 60209 11/14/91 Not an emissions reduction measure
Identification of Formaldehyde as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 03/12/92 Not an emissions reduction measure

Atmospheric Acidity Protection Fees. T 17, CCR, 90621.3 04/09/92 Not an emissions reduction measure

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90800.3, 90803 04/09/92 Not an emissions reduction measure

Criteria for Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 703 03, 70304 05/14/92 Not an emissions reduction measure
Transported Air Pollutants. T 17, CCR, 70500 05/28/92 Not an emissions reduction measure
Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, & 26, CCR, 90701, 90704, 90705 07/09/92 Not an emissions reduction measure

Identification of 1.3 Butadiene as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93000 07/09/92 Not an emissions reduction measure

CFC Refrigerants in Air Conditioning Systems. T 13, CCR, 2500 09/10/92 Air toxics control measure

Criteria for Area D esignations. T 17, CCR, 70303.5, 60200

- 60203, 60205, 70303 12/10/92 Not an emissions reduction measure

### 69 

### Table A

- 7 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board That Do Not Address Ozone in the South Coast Nonattainment Area 1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Transport Mitigation Regulations. T 17, CCR, 70600, 70601 03/11/93 Not an emissions reduction measure

Identification of Federal Hazardous Air Pollutant s as Toxic Air Contaminants. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93001, 39665, 39666 04/08/93 Not an emissions reduction measure

Acid Deposition Fee Regulations. T 17, CCR, 90622, 90621.4 04/08/93 Not an emissions reduction measure

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90800.4, 90803 04/08/93 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Emissions Inventory Criteria and Guidelines. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93300

- 93347 06/10/93 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulat ion. T 17, & 26, CCR, 90700

- 90705 07/08/93 Not an emissions reduction measure

Mitigation Transport Pollutants. T 17, CCR, 70500, 70600 08/12/93 Not an emissions reduction measure

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning. T 17, & 26, CCR, 93109, 93110 10/14/93 Air toxics control measure

Conflict of Interest. T 17, CCR, 90500 11/18/93 Not an emissions reduction measure
Criteria for Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 60200

- 60202, 60204, 60206, 60208, 70300

- 70306 11/18/93 Not an emission s reduction measure

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90800.5, 90803 04/14/94 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, & 26, CCR, 90700

- 90705 07/28/94 Not an emissions reduction measure

A rea Designations. T 17, CCR, 60201, 60204 11/09/94 Not an emissions reduction measure
Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90800.6, 90803 04/27/95 Not an emissions reduction measure

Employee

- Based Trip Reductions Emission Formula. T 13, CCR, 2330, 2331, 2332 06/29/95 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, CCR, 90700

- 90705 and Appendix A 01/25/96 Not an emissions reduction measure

Relaxation of Carbon Monoxide Emission Standards for Utility Engines. T 13, CCR, 2403 and incorporating test procedures 01/25/96 Carbon monoxide requirement

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90803, 90800.7 04/25/96 Not an emissions reduction measure

Basin Boundaries for Agricultural Bur ning (Mojave Desert, South Coast & Salton Sea). T 17, CCR, 60104, 60109, 60114, 80280, 80311 05/30/96 Not an emissions reduction measure

Regulation Improvement and Repeal. T 17, CCR, 93301

- 93355, Appendix A

- E (emissions inventory) 05/30/96 Not an emission s reduction measure

### 70 

### Table A

- 7 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board That Do Not Address Ozone in the South Coast Nonattainment Area 1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments
Emissions Inventory Criteria & Guideline Report. T 17, CCR, 93300.5 07/25/96 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, CCR, 90701

- 90705 Appendix A to §§ 90700

- 90705 09/26/96 Not an emissions reduc tion measure

Stationary Source Test Methods. T 17, CCR, 94105, 94107, 94114, 94135, 94141, 94143, 94161 09/26/96 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 60201

- 60209 11/21/96 Not an emissions reduction measure
Transport Pollutant s. T 17, CCR, 70500, 70600 11/21/96 Not an emissions reduction measure
Identification of Inorganic Lead as Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC). T 17, CCR, 93000 04/24/97 Not an emissions reduction measure

Interchangeable Emissions Reduction Credits. T 17, CCR, 9 1500 05/22/97 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, CCR 90701

- 90705 and Appendix A §§ 90700

- 90705 11/13/97 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations '97 . T 17, CCR, §§ 60201 & 60205 11/13/97 Not an em issions reduction measure

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T 17,CCR 90800.... 01/29/98 Not an emissions reduction measure

Classifying Minor Violations. T 17, CCR, 60090

- 60095 04/23/98 Not an emissions reduction measure

Airborne Toxic Co ntrol Measure for Chrome Plating. T 17, CCR, 93102 05/21/98 Not an emissions reduction measure

Identification of Diesel Exhaust as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, CCR, 93000 08/27/98 Not an emissions reduction measure

Stationary Source Test Methods. T 17, CCR, 94101

- 94104, 94106, 94108

- 94113, 941T 17

- 94124, 94137 and revision of Method 12. 10/22/98 Not an emissions reduction measure

Administrative Hearing Procedures. T 17, CCR, 60040 and 60075.1

- 60075.45 10/22/99 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations and Criteria for the National and State Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone. T 17, CCR, 60301, 60202, 60205, 60206, 70300

- 70306, 70303.1 10/22/98 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Fee Regulations. T 17, CCR, 9 0701

- 90705 and Appendix A 10/22/98 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards. T 17, CCR, 60201 11/18/99 Not an emissions reduction measure

Agricultural Burning Guidelines. T 17 Amendments 80145, 80T 179 , 80100

- 80102, 80110, 80120, 80130, 80140, 80150, 80155, 80160, 80T 170, 80180, 80200, 80210, 80230, 80240, 80250, 80260, 80270, 80280, 80290, 80300, 80310, 80311, 80320, 80330 03/23/00 Not an emissions reduction measure

### 71 

### Table A

- 7 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board That Do Not Address Ozone in the South Coast Nonattainment Area 1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments

Air Toxic Control Measure for Asbe stos Containing Serpentine. T 17, CCR, 93106 07/20/00 Air toxics control measure

Conflict of Interest Code. T 17, CCR, 95001, 95002, 95005, and subchapter 9 09/28/00 Not an emissions reduction measure

Rice Straw Conditional Burn Permit Program. T 17, CCR , 80101, 80156

- 80158 09/28/00 Not a South Coast control measure (Sacramento Valley air basin only)
Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulations. T 17, CCR, 90705 tables 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, and 4 10/26/00 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations for t he State Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone. T 17, CCR, 60201 11/16/00 Not an emissions reduction measure

Ozone Transport Assessment. T 17, CCR, 70500 & 70600 04/26/01 Not an emissions reduction measure

Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. T 17, CC R, 90700

- 90705 10/25/01 Not an emissions reduction measure

Review of California Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter and Sulfates. T 17, CCR, 70100,70200, and 70100.1 06/20/02 Not an emissions reduction measure

Administrative Civil Penalt ies Program. T 17, CCR, 60065.1

- 60065.45 and 60075.1

- 60075.45 12/12/02 Not an emissions reduction measure

Ozone Transport Mitigation Regulations. T 17, CCR, 70600 and 70601 05/22/03 Not an emissions reduction measure

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- ve hicular Sources. T 17, CCR, 90800.75, 90800.9, 90804, 90800.8, 90801, 90802, and 90803 07/24/03 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designation Criteria and Area Designations for State PM 2.5 and Ozone Ambient Air Quality Standards. T 17, CCR, 60201, 6 0202, 60205, 60210 01/22/04 Not an emissions reduction measure

Permit Fee Regulations for Non

- vehicular Sources. T17, CCR 90805 and 90806; and 90800.8 and 90803 11/18/04 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations. T 17, CCR, 60201, 60202, 60205 , 60210 01/20/05 Not an emissions reduction measure

State Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone. T 17, CCR, 70100, 70100.1, and 70200 04/28/05 Not an emissions reduction measure

Definition of Large Confined Animal Facility. T 17, CCR 86500 and 86501 06/ 23/05 Not an emissions reduction measure

Identification of Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. T 17, CCR, 93000 01/26/06 Not an emissions reduction measure

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Cruise Ships and Ocean

Going Ships Onboard Incineration ( amendments). T 17, CCR, 93119 11/16/06 Air toxics control measure

### 72 

### Table A

- 7 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board That Do Not Address Ozone in the South Coast Nonattainment Area 1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments
Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Emissions Inventory Criteria and Guidelines. T 17, CCR, 93300.5 and document incorporated by reference 11/16/06 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards. T 17, CCR, 60201, 60202, 60205, & 60210 11/16/06 Not an emissions reduction measure

Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Operations T17, CCR, 93109, 931 09.1, and 93109.2. 1/25/07 Air toxics control measure

State Ambient Air Quality Standard for Nitrogen Dioxide T17, CCR, 70100, 70100.1 and 70200, ARB document "Air Monitoring Quality Assura nce Manual Volume IV”, which is incorporated by reference in 70100.1. 2/22/07 Not an emissions reduction measure

Formaldehyde Emissions from Composite Wood Products T17, CCR, 9312 0

- 93120.12 4/26/07 Air toxics control measure

Smog Index Labels Regulations T13, CCR, 1961, 1965 6/21/07 Not an emissions reduction measure

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mandatory Reporting T17, CCR, 95100, 95101, 95102, 95103, 95104, 95105, 95106, 95107, 95108, 95109, 95110, 95111, 95112, 95113, 95114, 95115, 95125, 95130, 95131, 95132, 95133, and Appendix A 12/06/07 N ot an emissions reduction measure

Small Containers of Automotive Refrigerant 1/22/09 Not an emissions reduction measure

Semiconductor Operations 2/26/09 Air toxics control measure

Sulfur Hexafluoride Emissions in Non

- Semiconductor and Non

Utility Applications 2/26/09 Not an emissions reduction me asure

Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills 6/25

- 26/09 Not an emissions reduction measure

AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation 9/24/09 Not an emissions reduction measure

Tables of Maximum Incremental Reactivity Values 11/3/09 Not an emissions reduction measure

High Global Warming Potential Refrigerants for Stationary Sources 12/9/09 Not an emissions reduction measure

Indoor Air Cleaning Devices 12/9/09 Not an emissions reduction measure

Sulfur Hexafluoride Emissions from Gas Insulated Switchgear 2/25/10 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards 3/25/10 Not an emissions reduction measure

Energy Efficiency and Co

- Ben efits Assessment of Large Industrial Facilities 7/22/10 Not an emissions reduction measure

### 73 

### Table A

- 7 Measures Adopted by the California Air Resources Board That Do Not Address Ozone in the South Coast Nonattainment Area 1990 to 2013

Measure Hearing Date 1 Comments
Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Stationary Compression Ignition Engines 10/21/10 Not an emissions reduction measure

California Cap

- and

- Trade Program 12/16/10 Not an emissions reduction measure

Mandatory Reporting for Greenhouse Gas Emissions 12/16/10 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards 6/23/11 Not an emissions reductio n measure

AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation 10/20/11 Not an emissions reduction measure

Cap and Trade Regulation 6/28/12 Not an emissions reduction measure

Mandatory Reporting, Fee Regulation and Cap and Trade 2012 9/20/12 Not an emissions reduction measure

Area Designations ( 2013 Amendments to Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards) N/A Not an emissions reduction measure

Cap and Trade 10/24/13 Not an emissions reduction measure

Mandatory Reporting 10/24/13 Not an emissions reduction measure

Mobile Agricultural Equipment

. T13, CCR, 2428. 10/24/13 An administrative mechanism to ensure that incentive funded projects implemented in the San Joaquin Valley and using Carl Moyer Program Guidelines are surplus, q uantifiable, enforceable, and permanent, and result in emission reductions that are eligible for SIP credit. This measure has not yet been approved by CA’s OAL.

### 74



## VI. Air Quality Modeling

1. Requirements for Air Quality Modeling

CAA section 182(c)(2)(A) requires states with ozone nonattainment areas classified as serious or above to submit plans that demonstrate attainment of the applicable standard as expeditiously as practicable but no later than the applicable attainment date. The attainment demonstra tion must be based on photochemical grid modeling or another analytical method determined by the EPA Administrator to be at least as effective. Under the ozone implementation rule (40 CFR § 51.908; see 70 FR 71612 at 71624), the attainment demonstration is due within three years of the area’s designation as nonattainment and should include technical analyses to locate and identify sources of emissions that are causing violations of the 8

- hour ozone standard within the nonattainment area. Air quality modelin g is used to establish emissions attainment targets, the combination of emissions of ozone precursors that the area can accommodate without exceeding the NAAQS, and to assess whether the proposed control strategy will result in attainment of the NAAQS. Air quality modeling is performed for a base year and compared to air quality monitoring data in order to evaluate model performance. Once the performance is determined to be acceptable, future year changes to the emissions inventory are simulated to determin e the relationship between emissions reductions and changes in ambient air quality, and to show that the emission reductions are sufficient for attainment of the standard. The procedures for modeling ozone as part of an attainment SIP are contained in EPA’ s “Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM 2.5 

### , and Regional Haze.” EPA

- 454/B

- 07

- 002, April 2007 2 

### (“Guidance”).

2. Modeling in the Sacramento 2013 Ozone Plan

The Central California O zone Study (CCOS) comprises a field study data collection and processing, air quality modeling, and the continuing data analysis of ozone formation in Central California and neighboring areas. CCOS is a multi

- million dollar cooperative effort involving Cal ifornia cities, State and local and air pollution control agencies, federal agencies, industry groups, academics, and contractors. Meteorological and air quality field study data for CCOS were collected during the 4 months from June through October 2000 an d included five several

day intensive monitoring periods. The CCOS ozone episode selected for modeling was July 29

- August 2, 2000. CARB also modeled July 9

- 13, 1999, using routinely available meteorological and air quality data. CARB modeled these with the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx), with meteorological fields from the Mesoscale Model version 5 (MM5).
The 2013 Ozone Plan’s a ir quality modeling is discussed in the Executive Summary (p.1

- 5, pdf p.22), Chapter 4 “8

- hour Ozone Air Q uality Trends”, Chapter 6 “Air Quality Modeling Analysis” , and Chapter 10 “Weight

- of

- Evidence Determination”, with detailed descriptions and results in Appendix B “Photochemical Modeling.” An additional Plan component is the CARB

2 A vailable at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/final

- 03

- pm

- rh

- guidance.pdf).

### 75



### Staff Report, 3 

### which incl udes Appendix B “Attainment Demonstration Analysis” and Appendix F “Unmonitored Area Analysis”. The 2013 Ozone Plan, Appendix B (p. B

- 1, pdf p.22) references modeling documents including a Modeling Protocol

. 4



### The 2013 Ozone Plan uses the same model results , including modeling protocol, air quality model selection, episode selection, model domain and spatial resolution, boundary and initial conditions, meteorological model selection and set

- up, and emission inventory set

- up as was used in the 2007 San Joaqu in Valley (SJV) Ozone Plan 5 

### which was approved by EPA on March 1, 2012 (77 FR 12652). The 2007 SJV Ozone Plan also includes an extensive meteorological and air quality model performance evaluation over the entire modeling domain. a. Conceptual Descriptio n A “conceptual description” is a qualitative way of characterizing the nature of an area’s nonattainment or regional haze problem. It can be helpful in identifying potential stakeholders and for developing a modeling protocol; it could influence the choi ce of air quality model, modeling domain, grid cell size, priorities for quality assuring and refining emissions estimates, and the choice of initial diagnostic tests to identify potentially effective control strategies. In general, a conceptual descriptio n is useful for helping a state or tribe identify priorities and allocate resources in performing a modeled demonstration. The Guidance (pp. 126

- 128) lists examples of key components of such a description: local vs. regional nonattainment problem; vertic al and horizontal extent of high concentrations; characteristic spatial patterns; monitored violations at locations subject to mesoscale wind patterns ( e.g. , at a coastline) differing from the general wind flow; recent changes in precursor emissions in or near the nonattainment area; trends in design values or other air quality indicators that have accompanied emissions changes; spatial pattern to the trends; past modeling results; distinctive meteorological measurements coinciding with exceedances.

2013 Oz one Plan’s conceptual description has components in Appendix B (pp. B

- 2

– B

- 3) and in section 1.3 of the Modeling Protocol (pp. 6

- 8). These Plan portions note phenomena conducive to high ozone concentrations in the Sacramento Valley. The Modeling Protoco l notes that weather conditions leading to high ozone levels in the San Joaquin Valley include large

- scale, high

- pressure systems that develop over the Western United States, low wind speeds, and high temperatures. These conditions occur frequently in the San Joaquin Valley between May and September, and may persist for several days. This characterization also applies to ozone formation in the Sacramento Valley. As support, the 2013 Ozone Plan notes 500 mb heights at a fixed location, an indicator of behav ior showing the sequence of pressure ridges and troughs, and the 850 mb temperature, a measure of large

- scale subsidence which produces stable layers in the atmosphere and limits vertical dispersion of air pollutants, have historically correlated well with ozone formation over California.

3 “Staff Report on Proposed Revisions to the 8

- Hour Ozon e State Implementation Plan for the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area”, State of California Air Resources Board, Release Date: October 22, 2013.

4 “Photochemical Modeling Protocol for Developing Strategies to Attain the Federal 8

- hour Ozone Air Quality Standard in Central California”, California Air Resources Board, May 22, 2007, this document is located at http://eos.arb.ca.gov/eos/SIP _Modeling/ and in the docket associated with this action.

5 2007 Ozone Plan, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, dated April 30, 2007.

### 76

Additional flow patterns affecting ozone levels in the Sacramento Valley include transport between the Sacramento Valley, San Joaquin Valley and Bay Area as well as within valley up

- valley, down

- valley diurnal flows. The 2013 Ozone Plan description of the episodes modeled provide additional information on these con ditions leading to high ozone.



### EPA finds that the conceptual description of the ozone problem in Sacramento provided in the Plan forms an adequate basis for th e development of the modeling protocol and analysis work. b. Modeling Protocol A modeling protocol should detail and formalize the procedures for conducting all phases of the modeling study, such as describing the background and objectives for the study, creating a schedule and organizational structure for the study, developing the input data, conducting model performance evaluations, interpreting modeling results, describing procedures for using the model to demonstrate whether proposed strategies are suf ficient to attain the NAAQS and/or regional haze goals, and producing documentation to be submitted for EPA Regional Office review and approval. The Guidance (p. 134) lists topics to be addressed in the modeling protocol:

1. Overview of Modeling/Analysis Proj ect

a. Management structure b. Technical committees or other communication procedures to be used

c. Participating organizations d. Schedule for completion of attainment demonstration or uniform rate of progress analyses

e. Description of the conceptual model for the nona ttainment area (or Class I area(s))

2. Model and Modeling Inputs

a. Rationale for the selection of air quality, meteorological, and emissions models b. Modeling domain

c. Horizontal and vertical resolution d. Specification of initial and boundary conditions

e. Episode selec tion f. Description of meteorological model setup
g. Development of emissions inputs h. Geographic area identified for application of the attainment test(s) i. Methods used to quality assure emissions, meteorological, and other model inputs

3. Model Performance Evaluatio n
a. Describe ambient data base b. List evaluation procedures

c. Identify possible diagnostic testing that could be used to improve model performance

### 77



### 4. Supplemental Analyses

a. List additional analyses to be completed to corroborate the model attainment
test b. Outline pla ns for conducting a weight of evidence determination, should it be
necessary
5. Procedural Requirements

a. Identify how modeling and other analyses will be archived and documented b. Identify specific deliverables to EPA Regional Office
2013 Ozone Plan’s modeling p rotocol (“Protocol”) is referenced in the Staff Report, as noted above. The Protocol covers the most important topics recommended in the Guidance, as discussed following subsections. EPA finds the protocol is adequate for developing the attainment demonst ration.

c. Air Quality Model Selection A model should meet several general criteria for it to be a candidate for consideration in an attainment demonstration. Guidance, p. 136. These general criteria are consistent with requirements in 40 CFR § 51.112 an d 40 CFR part 51, Appendix W. The Guidance does not recommend a specific model for use in the attainment demonstration. At present, there is no single model which has been extensively tested and shown to be clearly superior than its alternatives. Thus, 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix W does not identify a “preferred model” for use in attainment demonstrations of the ozone NAAQS. Based on the language in Appendix W, models used for these purposes should meet requirements for “alternative models”. States/Tribes shou ld use a non

- proprietary model, which is a model whose source code is available for free (or for a “reasonable” cost). Furthermore, the user must be able to revise the code to perform diagnostic analyses and/or to improve the model’s ability to describe ob servations in a credible manner. The model should meet several additional prerequisites to be used to support an attainment demonstration:

1. revised in response to a scientific peer review;

2. appropriate for the specific application on a theoretical basis;

3. use d with a data base which is adequate to support its application;

4. shown to have performed well in past ozone or PM modeling applications (or if it is the first application, then the State should note why it believes the new model is expected to perform suff iciently); and

5. applied consistently with the protocol on methods and procedures.

### 78



### 2013 Ozone Plan’s Model selection is discussed in the Protocol (p. 20). CARB considered the SAQM 6 

### , CMAQ 7 

### , and CAMx 8 

### models. The SARMAP photochemical mechanism and numerical
tr ansport schemes were out of date, and costly to update. CMAQ was considered a viable option, though with limited application to California. CAMx was selected because it was felt to be faster running, it incorporates several probing tools (DDM and PA; see d iscussion of diagnostic evaluation in Air Quality Model Performance subsection below; CMAQ did not include these at that time), and the initial investigation showed it to have greater flexibility and ease of set up, as well as better performance based on l imited testing. Any of the three candidate models would have been acceptable. CAMx is explicitly mentioned in EPA Guidance (Table 13.1, p. 139), and EPA finds that CAMx is an adequate model for the ozone attainment demonstration.
2013 Ozone Plan’s chemica l mechanism selection was the California S tatewide A ir P ollution R esearch C enter (SAPRC). The Protocol noted (p. 31) that SAPRC was the most up

- to

- date mechanism available at the time, has been thoroughly peer

- reviewed, and has often been applied in Califo rnia. SAPRC is cited multiple times in EPA Guidance Appendix B summarizing model performance evaluations (p. 243), and CARB provides several good rationales for using it. EPA finds it is an adequate chemical mechanism for use in the attainment demonstratio n modeling. d. Episode Selection The Guidance discusses several criteria for selecting time periods to model ( p. 140

- 147). Experience has shown that evaluation ozone response to control strategies should rely on modeling of f ull synoptic cycles, preferabl y including ramp

- up and ramp

- down days. It is desirable to include a variety of meteorological conditions (regimes or episode types), concentrations near the area’s design value, periods with extensive meteorological and air quality databases, and a suffic ient number of days so that the modeled attainment test may be applied over multiple days. Episode types may be identified using qualitative procedures such as reviewing weather maps and wind patterns, or more quantitative procedures, such as Classificatio n and Regression Tree (CART) analysis or a principal component analysis (PCA). 2013 Ozone Plan’s episode selection is discussed in Chapter 6, Appendix B and in the Protocol. The chosen July 29

- August 2, 2000 episode coincided with one of five intensive
op eration periods of the 2000 CCOS field study. Meteorological and air quality characteristics of this episode are detailed starting at Chapter 6, p.6

- 5 (pdf p.79) and Appendix B, p.B

- 4 (pdf p.24). While ozone

- conducive conditions were prevalent throughout the episode, the highest readings in the Sacramento region occurred on August 1 st 

### at Sloughhouse (108 ppb), located in the southern part of the nonattainment area and on August 2 nd 

### at Auburn (107 ppbv) and Grass Valley (113 ppb), located in the northeast p art of the nonattainment area.

6 SAQM: S ARMAP A ir Q uality M odel, where SARMAP stands for SJV/AUSPEX Regional Modeling Adaptation Project (an emissions inventory and modeling system), and in turn AUSPEX stands for Atmospheric Utility Signature Prediction Experiment (a field study).

7 CMAQ: C ommunity M ultiscale A ir Q uality Modeling System, developed by EPA.

8 CAMx: C omprehensive A ir Quality M odel with E x tensions, developed by ENVIRON Corporatio n.

### 79



### The July 9

- 13, 1999 period was another period chosen for modeling as it was particularly conducive to ozone formation; though it had only routine meteorological and air quality data were available for it. Appendix B, p. B

- 5 (pdf p. 25). High surface 8

- hour ozone readings were widespread throughout the Sacramento region during the period, reaching a maximum at Folsom (129 ppb) on July 10 th



### . Four episodes were originally under consideration (the above two, September 17

- 21, 200 0, and August 8

- 17, 2002), but due to time and resource constraints the decision was made to focus on the July 2000 and July 1999 episodes, especially after initial modeling of the September 2000 episode showed poor performance. Appendix B, p. B

- 2 (pdf p.2 2); Protocol p. 11. Both of the modeled episodes displayed concentrations near the monitors’ ozone design values and had meteorological features typical of high ozone and transport patterns characteristic of Central California.

EPA finds that the chosen ep isodes provide an adequate basis for the attainment demonstration. e. Model Domain and Spatial Resolution
The model domain is chosen based the nature of the area’s ozone problem and the scale of the emissions that affect the nonattainment area and may be subject to control strategies. Isolated nonattainment areas that are not affected by regional transport of ozone and its precursors may be able to use a relatively small domain. Some areas of the western U.S. may fall into this category. The modeling doma in should be designed so that all major upwind source areas that influence the downwind nonattainment area are included in the modeling domain. The influence of boundary conditions should be minimized to the extent possible. Guidance p. 153 (pdf. 162).

For the horizontal resolution of the coarse portions of regional grids, we recommend a grid cell size of 12 km if feasible, but not larger than 36 km. For urban and fine scale portions of nested regional grids, it may be desirable to use grid cells about 4 km , but not larger than 12 km. States/Tribes should examine past model applications and data analyses for their area when choosing the fine grid resolution. Past model applications and data analyses may help determine whether a grid cell size as small as 4 k m (or smaller) is necessary for a particular area. Model performance and the relative response to emissions controls should be considered in the decision. States/Tribes should consider diagnostic tests to assess the difference in model performance and resp onse from varying model grid resolution, particularly in oxidant

- limited areas. All ozone monitor locations within a nonattainment area should ordinarily be placed within the fine scale portion of a nested regional grid if nested models are used. Guidance p. 157 (pdf. 166).
Vertical resolution chosen will vary depending on the application. There is no correct minimum number of vertical layers needed in an attainment demonstration. Greater resolution allows more precise estimation of mixing heights and avoid s unrealistic step increases in mixing; alignment with the layers in the meteorological model can affect accuracy; the lowest layer should generally by no more than 50 meters thick; resolution above the boundary layer can generally be coarser. Recent appli cations of one atmosphere models (with model tops at

### 80



### 100 millibars) have used anywhere from 12 to 21 vertical layers with 8

- 15 layers approximately within the boundary layer (below 2500 m) and 4

- 6 layers above the Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL). Guidance p . 159 (pdf. 168). 2013 Ozone Plan’s modeling domain is shown in Figure 6

- 1 of Chapter 6 (p. 6

- 5, pdf p.79), and was chosen with the objective of including all of the Central Valley of California and upwind areas. It includes most of California south of Mt. Shasta and north of Los Angeles, and extends from Pacific Ocean to the central Mojave Desert and Nevada. The grid horizontal resolution used is 4 km; the full grid is 185 x 185 cells. Protocol p. 26. The July 2000 episode used 20 layers, while the July 1 999 episode used 16 layers. Protocol p. 27. Given the topography of the Sacramento Valley, which has bounding mountains to the east, north, and west but which is open to the south and therefore subject to transport of ozone and emissions of ozone precursor s from the San Joaquin Valley and from the San Francisco Bay Area, the model domain encompasses the Sacramento nonattainment area as well as areas likely to contribute to its ozone problem. The boundaries are in rural northern California, the Nevada desert , mountains to the south, over the Pacific ocean, all areas with low emissions and so the model boundary conditions are unlikely to have a substantial effect on the simulations. The 4 km grid horizontal resolution used is considerably more refined than the 12 km Guidance recommendation, and the number of layers is consistent with the range in the Guidance. EPA finds the chosen modeling domain is adequate fo r the attainment demonstration.


## Sacramento Modeling Domain

Source: Protocol, Figure 4.2, p. 27 .



### f. Initial and Boundary Conditions

### 81



### If there is no larger regional model application available, then it is recommended that background boundary conditions be used to specify initial and boundary concentrations for the attainment demonstration modeling. Howeve r, concentration fields derived from a larger domain regional or global chemistry model ( i.e. nesting approach) is considered more credible than the assumption of static concentrations, since the pollutant concentration fields reflect simulated atmospheric chemical and physical processes driven by assimilated meteorological observations. Therefore, we recommend using boundary conditions derived from a regional or global scale model, whenever possible. We recommend using a “ramp

- up” period by beginning a sim ulation prior to a period of interest to diminish the importance of initial conditions; we recommend a ramp

- up period of at least 2

- 3 days for ozone. Diagnostic testing which indicates a large impact on the model results from initial or boundary conditions may indicate that the domain is not large enough or the ramp

- up period is too short. In either case, it should generally be assumed that initial and boundary conditions do not change in the future. The use of altered initial or boundary conditions in the future year should be documented and justified. Guidance p. 153 (pdf. 162). 2013 Ozone Plan’s initial and boundary conditions are discussed starting at Protocol p. 36. Generally defaults from earlier EPA guidance document “Guideline for the Regulatory Appl ication of the Urban Airshed Model”, EPA, (EPA

- 450/4

- 91

- 013, July 1991) were used as a starting point, but these were checked against available ozonesonde data and aircraft measurements. Final decisions on the initial and boundary conditions were made join tly by CARB, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, and the Sacramento Municipal Air Quality Management District. Protocol, p. 36; table of values on following page. The boundary conditions were left unchanged for simulation of future years, consistent with the EPA Guidance recommendation. A two

- day “ramp

- up” period was used for both episodes, to minimize the impact of uncertain initial conditions. Protocol p. 39.

EPA finds that the procedure use d to determine boundary and initial conditions is adequate for the attainment demonstration.

g. Meteorological Model Selection and Setup Generally a standard meteorological model should be used. The recommended approach for generating the meteorological data needed to conduct the attainment demonstration is to apply dynamic meteorological models with four dimensional data assimilation (FDDA). These models use the fundamental equations of momentum, thermodynamics, and moisture to determine the evolution of specific meteorological variables from a given initial state. When modeling past events, the use of data assimilation helps to “nudge” solutions so that they do not diverge greatly from the actual observed meteorological fields. A major benefit of using d ynamic meteorological models is that they provide a way of consistently characterizing meteorological conditions at times and locations where observations do not exist. Examples of frequently used meteorological models are listed below (Guidance p. 160 (pd f. 169)) :

 The Penn State University / National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model version 5 (MM5)

 The Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS)

### 82



###  The Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF)

A description of the methods used to generate th e meteorological fields should be included in the modeling protocol. In cases in which standard meteorological modeling ( e.g. MM5, RAMS, or WRF in a retrospective analysis mode) is not used, it is recommended that a detailed description of the technique th at is used to generate the three

- dimensional meteorological fields be shared with the appropriate EPA regional office(s) prior to conducting the air quality modeling analysis. Guidance p. 161 (pdf. 170).
The meteorological model domain must be large enough to contain the photochemical modeling domain. It is expected that most attainment demonstrations will cover large areas and use nested grids. The outermost grid should capture all upwind areas that can reasonably be expected to influence local concentrati ons of ozone, and/or PM 2.5 

### . One should extend the grid 3 to 6 cells beyond the domains of each air quality modeling grid to avoid boundary effects. EPA recommends that the dynamic meteorological models use the same grid resolution as desired for the air qu ality model applications. However, poor meteorological model performance or the extra costs incurred may not warrant finer resolution; in these specific situations it is recommended that the air quality model application use available results from meteorol ogical models on the next coarser scale. Guidance p. 161 (pdf. 170). Physics options in meteorological models allow users to select how a given feature will be simulated. For example, there may be several options for specifying the planetary boundary laye r scheme or the cumulus parameterization. In many situations, the “optimal” configuration cannot be determined without performing an initial series of sensitivity tests which consider various combinations of physics options over specific time periods and r egions. While these tests may not ultimately conclude that any one configuration is clearly superior at all times and in all areas, it is recommended that these sensitivity tests be completed, as they should lead to a modeling analysis that is best

- suited for the domain and period being simulated. Typically, the model configuration which yields predictions that provide the best statistical match with observed data over the most cases (episodes, regions, etc. ) is the one that should be chosen, although other more qualitative information can also be considered. Additionally, model configurations should be designed to account for the pollutants and time periods that are of most interest. Guidance p. 162 (pdf. 171). 2013 Ozone Plan’s meteorological model selecti on is discussed starting at Protocol p. 19. CARB considered the NCEP Eta model 9 

### , as well as RAMS, MM5, and WRF. The Eta model has mainly been used for weather forecasting and not as a research tool, whereas RAMS showed some poor characteristics when used f or air quality modeling by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and WRF has been little tested for SIP air quality modeling. MM5, on the other hand has been used extensively for SIPs, including by CARB, and so was chosen as the meteorological mode l. 2013 Ozone Plan’s meteorological model domain consists of three nested grids. The innermost is just larger than the photochemical domain that it supplies meteorological fields to; it has 189 x 189 cells, each 4 km on a side. This is nested within a 12 k m resolution grid covering the entire State of California, and that in turn is nested within an outer 36 km grid that

9 National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Eta Model (Greek eta, η, a height coordinate based on pressure).

### 83



### stretches inland to New Mexico and a similar distance west over the Pacific Ocean, and that extends from southern Canada to the tip of the Baja California peninsula. Protocol p. 23. Boundary conditions for the inner two grids are derived from the output of the next larger grid each is nested within. The July 2000 episode used 50 vertical layers, and the July 1999 episode used 30 layers. FDDA was used only for the outer two grids; data from some 300 surface and 25 upper air meteorological stations was available for FDDA for the year 2000 CCOS episode.



## Sacramento Valley Meteorological Domain

Source: Protocol, Figure 4.1, p. 23.



### 2013 Ozone Pla n’s physics options are listed starting at Protocol p. 29, such as Kain

- Fritsch cumulus parameterization for the outer grids (2000 episode only). The Protocol also states that many combinations of model options were tested before settling on the final choi ces. Some of these options are discussed in the following subsection on meteorological model performance.

EPA finds that the meteorological model choice and setup are consistent with the Guidance, and are adequate for use in the attainment demonstration mo deling.

h. Meteorological Model Performance

### 84



### EPA recommends that States/Tribes devote appropriate effort to the process of evaluating the meteorological inputs to the air quality model as we believe good meteorological model performance will yield more co nfidence in predictions from the air quality model. This evaluation should determine if the meteorological model output fields represent a reasonable approximation of the actual meteorology that occurred during the modeling period. This can be done via an operational evaluation ( i.e. , quantitative, statistical, and graphical comparisons). A second objective of the evaluation should be to identify and quantify the existing biases and errors in the meteorological predictions in order to allow for an downstrea m assessment of how the air quality modeling results are affected by issues associated with the meteorological data. This can be done via a more phenomenological assessment, i.e. , generally qualitative comparisons of observed features vs. their depiction i n the model data. Guidance p. 163 (pdf. 172). Operational Evaluation: The operational evaluation results should focus on the values and distributions of specific meteorological parameters as paired with and compared to observed data. It is recommended that the observation

- model matching be paired as closely as possible in space and time. Typical statistical comparisons of the key meteorological parameters will include: comparisons of the means, mean bias, mean normalized bias, mean absolute error, mean ab solute normalized error, root mean square error (systematic and unsystematic), and an index of agreement. For modeling exercises over large domains and entire ozone seasons or years, it is recommended that the operational evaluation be broken down into ind ividual segments such as geographic sub

- regions and/or months/seasons to allow for a more comprehensive assessment of the meteorological strengths and weaknesses. Phenomenological Evaluation: Within the conceptual description of a particular modeling

exer cise, it is recommended that the specific meteorological parameters that influence air quality be identified and qualitatively ranked in importance. When evaluating meteorological models or any other source of meteorological data, the focus of the phenomen ological evaluation should be on those specific meteorological phenomena that are thought to strongly affect air pollution formation and transport within the scope of a specific analysis. It is expected that this event

- oriented evaluation will need to summ arize model performance in terms of statistical metrics such as probability of detection and false alarm rate. As an example of a potential phenomenological analysis, many regional air quality modeling exercises attempt to assess the effects of transport o f emissions from one area to a downwind area with an intent to establish source

- receptor relationships. For these types of modeling analyses, accurate transport wind trajectories are needed to properly establish these source

- receptor linkages. In this type of model application, a useful event

- based meteorological evaluation would be to compare model

- derived trajectories versus those based on ambient data to determine what error distance can be associated with the model fields. 2013 Ozone Plan’s Meteorologic al Model Performance over the modeling domain shown above was evaluated in depth as part of the San Joaquin 2007 Ozone Plan (See Appendix F p. F

61) which we approved on March 1, 2012 (77 FR 12652). Performance statistics are presented in graphical form fo r various sub

- regions over the domain. They generally show results averaged over multiple sites within each sub

- region, and are only a subset of the many site

specific plots that were examined during development of the meteorological modeling. There are a) time series plots over the days of each episode showing observed and simulated wind

### 85



### speed, wind direction, or temperature, b) scatter plots of wind speed gross error against wind speed root mean square error, and c) scatter plots of temperature gross erro r against temperature bias. The scatter plots include lines indicating performance benchmarks. The plots are provided for the 1999 episode staring at p. F

- 67 (pdf. 69), and for the 2000 episode at p. F

79 (pdf. 81). Finally, maps of horizontal wind vectors are included for the 2000 episode with various physics options, starting at p. F

- 89 (pdf. 91). For the 1999 episode, statistics and plots were prepared for three different MM5 runs: without FDDA, with FDDA, and with FDDA but excluding data from short (2 m eter) meteorological towers. CARB notes that FDDA improved results, but excluding the 2 meter data made little difference. The regular FDDA run of MM5 was used for the air quality modeling. CARB provided summaries of some of the results: For the Bay Area r egion, wind speeds were generally underpredicted and temperatures showed good agreement with observations, while for the Sacramento region wind speed performance was good ,and temperatures tended to be underpredicted during the day and overpredicted during the morning. For the Central, Southern, and Northern San Joaquin regions, winds tended to be underpredicted some, and again temperatures tended to be underpredicted during the day and overpredicted during the morning. The simulations were the result of su bstantial effort by the CARB and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and though not ideal, were deemed ac ceptable for use in modeling. S ee results summary staring at p. F

- 65 (pdf. 67). For the 2000 episode, statistics and plots were prepared for six different MM5 runs: four produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) with alternative land

- surface model physics options and roughness lengths, and two produced by CARB, with and without FDDA. These runs had various choice of soil physics and boundary layer parameterizations. After noting the variability of results for different locations, CARB states that the NOAA runs with increase roughness length tended to worsen performance for temperature. CARB also states that all of th e FDDA runs did fairly well for the wind field, but for temperature the initia l NOAA run performed the best. Although for the Angiola temperature time series included in the documentation, the CARB runs look better. Figure 1

- 12(a), p. F

- 87 (pdf. 89). The i nitial NOAA run of MM5 was used for the air quality modeling. S ee results summary staring at p. F

- 77 (pdf. 79). CARB states that, in addition to these operational evaluation analyses, qualitative performance analyses of the meteorological model were undert aken. These included comparison of modeled and observed wind patterns, to ensure that the model is reproduce phenomena known to occur in the SJV, such as the sea breeze, the Fresno eddy, and slope and drainage flows. They also included comparison of wind p rofiler observations with the simulated wind field at the profiler location, and of upper air observations with simulated mixing layer height. p. F

- 64 (pdf. 66). The operational evaluation undertaken by CARB is consistent with the recommendations in the EP A Guidance, in terms of meteorological parameters examined, statistics computed, and the consideration of differing sub

- regions within the model domain. The CARB qualitative analyses mentioned above are also consistent with the EPA Guidance recommendations for a phenomenological evaluation. EPA finds that the meteorological model evaluation and the

### 86



### model performance are adequate to support the air quality model for the attainment demonstration.

i. Emission Inventory Air quality modeling requires emission inputs for base case, baseline, and future modeling years. Preparation of emissions data for air quality models for the base and future years requires several steps. First, States and Tribes need to compile base

- year inventories for their modeling region ( e.g. , the States and Tribes in the modeling grid). For ozone model applications, emission inventories should include a complete accounting of anthropogenic and biogenic VOC (speciated), NO x 

### , and CO. Second, modelers must collect “ancillary data” associated with the inventories, which prescribes the spatial, temporal, and chemical speciation information about the emission inventory. Third, modelers use the ancillary data for “emissions modeling”. Emissions models spatially, temporally, chemically, and vertic ally allocate emission inventories to the resolution needed by air quality models. Fourth, modelers must collect data on growth rates and existing control programs for use in projecting the base year emission inventories to the future year, and then use an emissions model to prepare that future year inventory data for input to the air quality model. Fifth, emissions inventories that reflect the emissions reductions needed for attainment will have to be prepared for air quality modeling.
2013 Ozone Plan’s em issions inputs are discussed starting at Protocol p. 40 start. The Protocol provides description of the modeling inventory preparation process. The topics covered include: quality assurance checks, the effects of growth and of the application of control me asures, temporally resolved emissions for some larger point sources, temporal allocation of annual emissions to account for monthly and weekly variations, diurnal profiles of emissions, temperature dependence of emissions from some source types, California

- specific vehicle emissions from the EMFAC model, a summary of some of the algorithms and inputs to the BEIGIS biogenic emissions model, spatial allocation of the various source category emissions into model grid squares (via known coordinates for point so urces and for links of the roadway network, land use and demographic spatial surrogates for area source categories), speciation of VOC emissions into particular chemical species needed by the photochemical model’s chemical mechanism, and speciation of NO x 

### into NO and NO 2 

### . The Protocol’s description of the emissions input process is fairly comprehensive, and covers all the key topics in the EPA Guidance. EPA finds that the emission inventory prepared for input to the air quality model is adequate to support the attainment demonstration.

j. Air Quality Model Performance Model performance can be assessed in terms of its ability to replicate observed concentrations of ozone and its precursors (operational evaluation), and in terms of the model’s ability to co rrectly portray physical processes, and thus its ability to simulate the effect of emission changes (diagnostic evaluation).
For the operational evaluation , useful statistical metrics include mean normalized bias (MNB), mean normalized gross error (MNGE), peak bias (APPB), and peak error (APPE). The defining formulas are at Guidance p. 198 (pdf. 207). Other statistics such as mean bias, mean

### 87



### error, root mean square error, correlation coefficients, etc

. should also be calculated to the extent that they prov ide meaningful information. Graphical analyses can also be useful, such as time series and scatter plots of modeled vs. observed concentrations, spatial plots or animations of modeled ozone in each grid cell with observed values noted for monitor locations . EPA no longer recommends specific performance goals for statistical metrics, and cautions against their use as “pass/fail” tests. Guidance p. 216 (pdf. 225). Instead, the results of various tests and analyses should be weighed qualitatively to assess the adequacy of model performance. Appendix B to the Guidance lists sets of performance goals and results that have been used in recent model evaluations.
For the diagnostic evaluation , the Guidance discusses a number of approaches, including observational mo dels, probing tools, receptor models, retrospective analyses, and sensitivity analyses. Guidance p. 208 (pdf. 217). Observational models include the use of indicator species ratios that give clues about which processes are dominant, and whether VOC or NO x 

### is the limiting precursor for ozone formation. Probing tools include source apportionment tools that track the chemical products of emissions from specified source groups, the direct decoupled method (DDM) that reports model sensitivity to input changes wi thout rerunning the model, and process analysis (PA) that tracks the contributions of particular physical and chemical process to model results. A retrospective analysis compares modeled trends to observed trends given known emission changes over a histori cal period. Sensitivity analyses explore the model response to changes in important inputs such as total emissions, alternative boundary conditions, alternative meteorological models or model setups, alternative vertical layer schemes, and finer or coarse grid resolution. All of these methods can help to determine whether the model responds in a physically reasonable way to change, and to identify inputs that may need further refinement. 2013 Ozone Plan’s air quality model performance is discussed briefly i n 2013 Ozone Plan Chapter 6, and in detail in Appendix B. Chapter 6 states: “Based on the statistical comparisons between observed ozone and predicted ozone data, the base case modeling scenarios were determined to be performing adequately overall in the S acramento Region.” p 6

- 6 (pdf p.80). Appendix B lists statistics that were calculated to evaluate model performance for 1

- hour ozone and 8

- hour ozone (Tables B

- 5

– B

- 30). These are substantially the same as the statistics recommended in the EPA Guidance. T he exception is that instead of the peak bias and peak error, a comparable “peak site prediction ratio” and “region peak prediction ratio” are listed; here the peak ratios are unpaired meaning that concentrations are not paired hour by hour, but rather the peak concentration for the day is considered, regardless of the particular hour. The 1999 episode performance is summarized in Appendix B, Tables B

- 5

– B

- 6. Day and site specific statistics are detailed in Tables B

- 9

– B

- 19. The 2000 episode performance is summarized in Appendix B, Table B

- 7

– B

- 8. Day and site specific statistics are detailed in Tables B

- 20

– B

- 30. Examination of the episode summary tables shows a slight underprediction and a slight overprediction in 8

- hour ozone, for example, as charac terized by the five

- day episode average of the mean normalized bias for the Sacramento Region,

- 2% and +9% for 1999 and 2000 episodes respectively. Additional performance evaluations over the remaining modeling domain can be found in the SJV 2007 Ozone Pl an, Appendix F and our TSD associated with that action (77 FR 12652)

### 88



### EPA f inds the model performance is adequate for conducting the attainment demonstration.

k. Modeled Attainment Test

A modeled attainment test is an exercise in which an air quality mode l is used to simulate current and future air quality. If future estimates of ozone concentrations are less than the NAAQS, then this element of the attainment test is satisfied. Our recommended test is one in which model estimates are used in a “relative” rather than “absolute” sense. That is, we take the ratio of the model’s future to current (baseline) predictions at monitors. We call these ratios relative response factors , RRFs. Future ozone concentrations are estimated at existing monitoring sites by mu ltiplying the modeled relative response factor at locations “near” each monitor by the observation

- based “baseline” design value for the monitor. The resulting predicted “future concentrations” are compared to NAAQS. Guidance p. 15 (pdf. 24).

Future concen tration = (baseline design value) * (model future prediction) / (model baseline prediction) = (baseline design value) * RRF

After analyzing how RRFs vary with the number of days modeled and with the choice of minimum ozone threshold, EPA recommended sever al criteria for day selection to ensure that the RRFs are robust in the face of natural variability (Guidance p. 146 (pdf. 155)):

 If there are 10 or more days with daily maximum 8

- hour average baseline modeled ozone > 85 ppb, then use an 85 ppb threshold.

 If there are less than 10 days with daily maximum 8

- hour average baseline modeled ozone > 85 ppb, then reduce the threshold down to as low as 70 ppb until there are 10 days in the mean RRF calculation.

 If there are less than 10 days with daily maximum 8

- ho ur average modeled ozone > 70 ppb, then use all days > 70 ppb.

 Don’t calculate an RRF for sites with less than 5 days > 70 ppb.

2013 Ozone Plan’s NAAQS attainment test is discussed in Appendix B, starting at p. B

- 33 (pdf p.53) . The Plan provides RRF tables and ozone isopleths diagrams (“carrying capacity diagrams”) for each monitoring site for the future year 2018 (Appendix B, Figures B1

- B10). Each table has a column for every day modeled in the two episodes, and has entries for observed and modeled peak concentration, modeled peak within 15 km, design value, average of the modeled peak over days eligible for inclusion in the RRF calculation, and the future year concentration within 15 km. The ratio of the latter two is the RRF itself, which is not explici tly shown. Below each table is an ozone isopleth diagram, which shows ozone concentration for various fractional emissions reductions from the original forecasted 2018 planning emissions inventory (121 tpd ROG and 104 tpd NO x 

### ). The isopleths show the ozone result with the application of the RRFs, and with an “offset” of 40 ppb (which is assumed to be a background value not affected by emission reductions). The attainment test was based on these isopleths.

### 89



### The reductions needed by the plan overall were drive n by results at the peak ozone site, Cool. This site has a base year design value of 88 ppb (Appendix B, p. B

- 40, pdf p.61). The Plan states that year 2018 emission reductions from all new local, regional, state and federal control measure committals (11.6 % VOC and 16.3% NO x 

### ) are more than the percent reduction needed, and will provide reductions for accelerated progress (see strike

- out point A in Figure B

- 1 on p.B

40). The air districts within the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area (SFNA) initially ado pted a 2009 Sacramento Regional 8

- hour ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan in February 2009 (2009 Ozone Plan), which included the air quality modeling discussed above . At the time, the 2009 Ozone Plan reflected the best available emissio n inventory and modeling calculations. Since then, CARB and Districts within SFNA have updated several emission inventory categories including trucks, in

- use off

- road equipment, ocean

- sea going vessels, and cargo handling equipment. This review has resulte d in a 16% reduction in NO x 

### and a 9% reduction in VOC as compared with the 2002 baseline emission inventory used as the basis for the 2009 Ozone Plan air quality modeling. Because photochemical modeling is a multi

- year, time and resource intensive process, modeling to include the revised emission estimates was not conducted here. Instead new emissions targets were developed using an alternative approach. The response of the existing modeling to percent emission reductions is assumed to apply, despite the ch ange in absolute emissions levels in the baseline. This approach determines whether emission reductions from the baseline year, using revised emission estimates, are consistent with attainment using existing modeling. This is a conservative approach, sinc e existing ozone response diagrams show that ozone concentrations decrease more rapidly as NO x 

### emissions decrease ( i.e. , incrementally, each new ton of NO x 

### reductions will have a greater ozone benefit).
Table B

- 31 compares the original and updated NOx and VOC emission estimates. The percent change in the 2002 baseline and 2018 a year inventory from the 2009 Ozone SIP are 54% and 27% for NO x 

### and VOC respectively. The percent change using updated emissions are 53% and 33% respectively, sufficient to achieve attainment using existing modeling (see point A in Figure B

- 1 on p.B

- 40). The 2013 Ozone Plan applies the modeled attainment test in accordance with EPA Guidance, except Plan’s version is more conservative, since it assumes a constant 40 ppb background. Th e revised inventory analysis supports the conclusion that adopted controls will result in attainment by 2018. Given all the uncertainties the carrying capacity, the approach used is acceptable. EPA finds that the Plan’s modeled attainment test was correctl y applied, and that the modeling demonstrates attainment of the ozone NAAQS.

l. Unmonitored Area Analysis

An unmonitored area analysis (UAA) uses a combination of model output and ambient data to identify areas without a monitor that might exceed the NA AQS in the base year or after application of the control strategy. This is necessary because the recommended modeled attainment test based on relative reduction factors may be applied only at monitor locations, and is particularly necessary in nonattainmen t areas where the ozone or PM 2.5 

### monitoring

### 90



### network just meets or minimally exceeds the size of the network required to report data to Air Quality System (AQS). The analysis should include, at a minimum, all nonattainment counties and counties surrounding the nonattainment area (located within the State). In order to examine unmonitored areas in all portions of the domain, it is recommended to use interpolated spatial fields of ambient data combined with gridded modeled outputs. G uidance p. 29 (pdf. 38). EP A’s MATS software can perform this calculation, but other methods may also be used. Due to the location of monitored data, the results of the analysis are less certain than for the modeled attainment test and should be handled on a case by case basis, poss ibly by additional analyses or tracking. G uidance pp. 32 and 33 (pdf. 41 and 42), respectively.
Gradient

- adjusted spatial fields are first created for the base year. Future year estimates can then be created by applying gridded RRFs to the gradient

- adjuste d spatial fields. The basic steps are as follows:

1. 

### Interpolate base year ambient data to create a set of spatial fields;

2. 

### Adjust the spatial fields using gridded model output gradients (base year values);

3. 

### Apply gridded model RRFs to the gradient

- adjusted spa tial fields; and

4. 

### Determine if any unmonitored areas are predicted to exceed the NAAQS in the future.
The 2013 Ozone Plan’s unmonitored area analysis is discussed in CARB’s Staff Report, Appendix F “Unmonitored Analysis”. This analysis used MATS with the de fault configuration following the four steps laid out in the Guidance, and provided maps at each step, colored according to the resulting ozone level (or the RRF, for step 3). CARB notes the monitors show adequate coverage of the regions with elevated ozo ne concentrations. The network captures elevated ozone within a 15

- km radius of the monitors and no peak concentrations are found outside of the networks spatial coverage. Therefore CARB concludes, no unmonitored areas with concentrations higher than those predicted to occur at the monitors in the attainment
year.
EPA finds that the unmonitored area analysis was properly performed, and that its results support the attainment demonstration. m. Weight of Evidence Determination States/Tribes should always per form complementary analyses of air quality, emissions and meteorological data, and consider modeling outputs other than the results of the attainment test. Such analyses are instrumental in guiding the conduct of an air quality modeling application. Someti mes, the results of corroboratory analyses may be used in a weight of evidence determination to show that attainment is likely despite modeled results which may be inconclusive. The further the attainment test is from being passed, the more compelling
cont rary evidence produced by corroboratory analyses must be to draw a conclusion differing from that implied by the modeled attainment test results. Guidance p. 17 (pdf. 26). Supplemental analyses could include additional modeling using alternative models and inputs, modeling apportionment and process analysis tools, alternative metrics (such as change in the number of grid cells above the NAAQS), trends in ambient air quality, trends in emissions, receptor modeling, and indicator species approaches.

### 91 T ABLE 

### B

- 1 

## Guidelines For Weight of Evidence Determinations

Results of Modeled Attainment Test Supplemental Analyses Ozone Annual PM 2.5 24

- Hour PM 2.5

Future Design Value < 82 ppb, all monitor sites Future Design Value

< 14.5 μg/m 3 , all monitor sites Future Desig n Value

< 62 μg/m 3 , all monitor sites Basic supplemental analyses

should be completed to confirm the outcome of the modeled attainment test

Future Design Value 82

- 87 ppb, at one or more sites/grid cells Future Design Value

14.5

- 15.5 μg/m 3 , at

one or mor e sites/grid cells Future Design Value

62

- 67 μg/m 3 , at one or more sites/grid cells A weight of evidence

demonstration should be conducted to determine if aggregate supplemental analyses support the modeled attainment
test

Future Design Value > 88 ppb, at one or more sites/grid cells Future Design Value

> 15.5 μg/m 3 , at one or more sites/grid cells Future Design Value

> 68 μg/m 3 , at one or more sites/grid cells More qualitative results are less

likely to support a conclusion differing from the outcome of t he modeled attainment test.



### 2013 Ozone Plan’s weight of evidence determination is discussed in the 2013 Ozone Plan, Chapter 10 with additional information in Chapter 4. This discussion includes ozone air quality trends, meteorologically adjusted ozone tr ends, and precursor emission and ambient trends, all of which show continued progress toward NAAQS attainment.

NO x 

### and VOC (comparable to “ROG” in the Plan documents) emissions are estimated to have declined since the mid

- 1990s. The analysis in Chapter 4 indicates that the number of days over the 8

- hour ozone standard for the peak monitoring site in each year from 1990

- 2012 decreases from about 34 down to 15, which equals a decline rate of about 0.8 exceedance days per year (r 2 

### = 0.32). The ozone design val ue (which is the running 3

- year average of the 4 th 

### highest daily ozone value for each year) for the peak monitoring site also indicates a decline, from 107 ppb down to about 98 ppb. The ozone design value has improved from being 24 ppb (or 28%) over the st andard down to about 14 ppb (or 16%), which equals a decline rate of about 0.4 ppb per year (r 2 

### = 0.52). There is considerable year

- to

- year variability due to meteorological factors, however, there appears to be overall improvement as indicated by the trend lines shown. During the late

- 1990s, the ozone problem was more widespread throughout the nonattainment area. Now, the ozone problem is confined to the central subregion and more urbanized portions of the eastern subregion.

EPA finds that these analyses support the attainment demonstration prediction of ozone NAAQS attainment, and constitute an adequate weight of evidence determination.

3. Conclusions

### 92



### The modeling used for the attainment demonstration was made available to the public for comment at the same time as the draft 2013 Ozone Plan, and were subject to public hearing as part of final version of the Plan. The air quality modeling documentation in Chapter 6 and Appendix B of the Plan and CARB’s Unmonitored Area Analysis, contains all the elements required by EPA’s modeling guidance. The modeling is based on the best and most current information available at the time the plan was developed. Based on our evaluation discussed above, we propose to find that the modeling analysis used for the attainmen t demonstration in the 2013 Ozone Plan meet the CAA section 182(c)(2)(A) requirement that the plan provide for attainment of the NAAQS, and that the modeling in the 2013 Ozone Plan provides an adequate basis for the Plan’s reasonably available control meas ures, reasonable further progress, and attainment demonstrations.

### 93



### VII. Post

- 2018 Contingency Measure

The Sacramento Ozone Plan relies on emission reductions in excess of RFP as contingency measures if the SMA fails to meet RFP requirements. If the SMA fail s to attain by June 15, 2019, the Sacramento Ozone Plan relies on additional incremental emissions reductions in 2019 from fleet turnover resulting from continued implementation of measures in the Revised 2007 State Strategy.

To provide contingency measu res for failure to attain, the SIP relies on the additional incremental emissions reductions resulting from fleet turnover in calendar year 2019 (the year after the attainment year). Additional emissions reductions resulting from turnover in the on

- and of f

- road mobile source fleet in 2019 may be used to meet the attainment contingency measure requirement. Table 1 4 below demonstrates that the Sacramento Ozone Plan has sufficient VOC reductions in 2019 to provide at least a three percent reserve for use as a possible attainment contingency measure. In addition, the Sacramento Ozone Plan also provides NO x 

### reductions in 2019 that are available for use in support of the attainment contingency measure, although the NOx reductions alone do not provide a three perc ent reserve unless combined with a portion of the VOC reductions.

Table 1 4 . Calculation of Post

- 2018 Attainment Contingency Measure

Emission Calculations VOC
tpd NO x



### tpd

A . 2018 Attainment Year Inventory Target 107 .1 7 6.5

B . CARB 2019 Emissions Forecas t 99.8 a 

### 74 .4 a



### C . EPA Adjustments to 2019 Inventory 0 +0.5 b



### D . Adjusted 2019 Inventory (Line B + Line C ) 99.8 7 4.9

E . Forecasted 2019 Creditable Reductions (Since 2018) Exceeding the Attainment Target Since 2018 (Line A

– Line D ) 7.3 1.6

F . Forecasted Percent Reductions Since 2018 (Line E ÷ Line D ) 7 % 2 %

G . Percent Reduction Required From 2018 Adjusted Baseline Inventory 3 % na c



### H . Attainment Contingency Measure Met? (Is Line F > o r = Line G ?) Yes na c

a Tables C1 and C2 of CARB’s 2013 Staff Report. These are conservative estimates because, for example, the on

road mobile source estimates do not include reductions for Moyer, Prop 1B, RFG, Smog Check, AB1493, and Advanced Clean Car program.

b EPA removed estimated reductions credit s for non

- road mobil e source reductions from Moyer and Prop 1B programs currently not in the SIP.

c not applicable (na) because requirement already met by VOC reductions.

### 94



### VIII. Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets

Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in the Sacramento Ozone Plan (tpd, average summer weekday) NO x 

### VOC 2014 2017 2018 2014 2017 2018 On

- Road Inventory 4 7.70 3 7.12 3 4.34 23.43 18.98 17.75 CARB adjustments to baseline a 

### RFG 0.0 0.0 0.0

- 1.87

- 1.47

- 1.31 Prop 1B

- 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Moyer

- 0.08

- 0.04

- 0.05 0.0 0.0 0.0 AB1493

- 0.01

- 0.01

- 0.01

- 0.11

- 0.21

- 0.33 Smog Check

- 0.37

- 0.37

- 0.33

- 0.64

- 0.57

- 0.33 Advanced Clean Cars 0.0

- 0.18

- 0.28 0.0

- 0.12

- 0.15 Regional Strategy Reductions b



### - 0.53

- 0.41

- 0.49

- 0.10

- 0.03

- 0.03 Totals 45.02 36.11 33.19 20.70 16.58 1 5.46

EPA adjustments for measures not in the SIP Prop 1B

- 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Moyer

- 0.08

- 0.04

- 0.05 0.0 0.0 0.0 Regional Strategy Reductions

- 0.53

- 0.41

- 0.49

- 0.10

- 0.03

- 0.03 EPA adjustment s t otals 47.33 36.56 33.73 20.8 16.61 15.49 Safety Margin 3 2 3 2 1 1 Adjusted MVEBS 50.33 38.56 36.73 22.80 17.61 16.49 Adjusted MVEBs (r ounded up ) 

### 51 39 37 23 18 17 MVEBs in Sacramento Plan that EPA has found adequate c 

### 49 39 37 23 18 17

a 2013 CARB Staff Report , Appendix E, Table E1.

b Sacrame nto Plan, Appendix F, Table F

- 1. The Regional Strategy Reductions includes the Sacramento Emergency Clean Air & Transportation Grant Program ( SECAT ).

c 79 FR 46436, August 8, 2014.

Discussion

EPA cannot credit reductions from on

- road mobile source incenti ve measures that have not approved by EPA . The Proposition 1B program, Carl Moyer program, and SECAT program measures have not been approved by EPA

. Therefore, these reductions are not eligible for use in a budget test. For the 2014 NO x budget , removing cr edit for measures not in the SIP would still allow for a conformity test to pass the 49 tpd NOx budget as long as the remaining safety margin is not exceeded

. In the Sacramento Plan, the 2014 NOx budget includes a 3.0 tpd safety margin plus a 0.98 tpd cush ion from rounding up the on

- road inventory . This creates a total buffer of approximately 4.0 tpd of NOx. By removing credits (i.e., 2.3 tpd of NOx) for measures not in the SIP, a safety margin of approximately 1.7 tpd of NOx still remains. Therefore, EPA d oes not expect it will be difficult to pass a budget test for NOx during the 2014

- 2017 time frame. If and when EPA approves the Proposition 1B program, Carl Moyer program, and SECAT program measures into the SIP, the 2014 safety margin will increasing redu ctions from those programs can be credited in the budget test. This will potentially result in restoration of the entire 3 tpd safety margin, depending on which programs the State submits and EPA approves.
For all VOC budgets and for the 2017 and 2018 NOx budgets, the entire safety margin is available, even after disallowing credit for measures currently not in the SIP.

### 95



### IX. Status of Reasonable Available Control Technology State Implementation Plan Submittals

District Submittal Status Published Cite#

Feathe r River AQMD 10/27/2009 Under Review

- -

Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD 01/21/2009 Under review

- -

Placer County APCD 07/11/2007 Under Review

- -
Placer County APCD 07/18/2014 Under review

- -

Yolo Solano AQMD 01/31/2007 Proposed Disapproval 08/18/2008 73 FR 48166

El Dorado AQMD 07/11/2007 Final Approval 04/18/2014 79 FR 21849