alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Genuine Realty Corp., Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Gail Mitchell, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Susan F. Avery, J.), dated November 8, 2017, which denied her motion to vacate a default final judgment and dismiss the petition in a holdover summary proceeding.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Susan F. Avery, J.), dated November 8, 2017, modified by granting tenant's motion to the extent of vacating the default final judgment and deeming tenant's proposed answer timely served and filed; as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.</p><p>Given the strong public policy of this State to dispose of cases on the merits (<a href="../2011/2011_00002.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Chevalier v 368 E. 148th St. Assoc., LLC, </i>80 AD3d 411</a>, 413-414 [2011]), we favorably exercise our discretion and grant tenant's motion to vacate the default final judgment in this holdover summary proceeding based upon allegations of illegal subletting. Tenant demonstrated a reasonable excuse for her unintended default - she was in Missouri caring for her ailing mother and was unaware of the proceeding in time to defend - and a potentially meritorious defense to the holdover proceeding (<a href="../2015/2015_50370.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Horseshoe Realty, LLC v Meah</i>, 47 Misc 3d 127</a>[A],2015 NY Slip Op 50370[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2015]; <a href="../2014/2014_50842.htm" target="_blank"><i>Jones v Jones</i>, 43 Misc 3d 141</a>[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 50842[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2014]). In the circumstances, the viability of this rent stabilized tenancy of more than thirty years' duration should not be determined on default.</p><p>We sustain the denial of tenant's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Tenant's argument that landlord was required to serve her in Missouri is unavailing, since she failed to establish that she provided landlord with "written information" that she resided elsewhere (RPAPL 735[1][a]; <a href="../2009/2009_51822.htm" target="_blank"><i>235 W. 22nd St., LLC v Genshaft</i>, 24 Misc 3d 145</a>[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 51822[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2009]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: October 17, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 99.1


1.   The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
     Officer of AmeriVest Properties Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to
     18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 (ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). This
     Certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB of AmeriVest Properties Inc. for
     the quarter ended March 31, 2003.

2.   We certify that such Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
     information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AmeriVest
     Properties Inc.

May 9, 2003
                                                By: /s/ William T. Atkins
                                                --------------------------------
                                                William T. Atkins
                                                Chief Executive Officer

                                                By: /s/ D. Scott Ikenberry
                                                --------------------------------
                                                D. Scott Ikenberry
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### Seaman Body Corporation, Respondent, vs. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and others, Appellants.

*May 1*

June *11, 1930.*

*14For the appellants there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general, attorneys for the Industrial Commission and the State of Wisconsin, and *IJerbert A. Bunde*of Wisconsin Rapids, attorney for Otto J. Haas, and oral argument by *Mr. Levitan.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Famsett & Shea*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Edmund B. Shea.*

Stevens, J.

The cases which consider the effect of instructions and other attempts to limit the sphere of one’s employment fall into two general classes: *first,*those which actually limit the sphere of employment; *second,*those which attempt to regulate the conduct of employees while acting within the prescribed sphere of employment, such as instructions to use guards or safety devices. ' The failure to use such devices does not take an employee outside the sphere of his employment.

The instant case falls within the first class. The employer had set apart a portion of the balcony and protected it in such a way that an employee could not enter unless he unscrewed the fastening of a door or squeezed his body through an eighteen-inch opening between the wall and the frame of the inclosure.

Employers effectually limit the scope of an employment when they erect physical barriers which make access to the *15prohibited area as difficult as it was in the case at bar. When employees go outside the limits of employment which are as clearly defined by physical barriers as they were in the case at bar, they take themselves outside the protection given them by the workmen’s compensation act, because injuries sustained by them under such circumstances are not incidental to and do not arise out of their employment.

The case involves more than mere disobedience to instructions as to the place in which service was to be performed, as was the case in *Frint Motor Car Co. v. Industrial Comm.*168 Wis. 436, 439, 170 N. W. 285. Here the employer effectually limited the sphere of the employment by the erection of physical barriers which were well calculated to exclude employees from the prohibited area. The plaintiff did not merely give instructions as to the sphere of the employment. It erected barriers which effectively marked the limits of that sphere.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 13, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 28, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 550 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-175, K2025-173.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26280 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32(a)


18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification





I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-Q of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp.








Date: August 9, 2010





By:/s/ Mary B. Halsey


Mary B. Halsey


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)






























































Exhibit 32(b)


18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification





I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-Q of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp.








Date: August 9, 2010





By:/s/ Robert Lee Whitehead


Robert Lee Whitehead


Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
# Official Journal C 223/7 Se

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 223 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 477 September 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 223

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 477 September 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 223/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 223/2 | State aid — Belgium — Aid C 76/2003 ex NN 69/2003 — Reduction of a VAT debt owed by Umicore SA (formerly Union Minière SA) — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 223/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3351 — ARVINMERITOR/VOLVO (Axle Assets)) (1) | 19 |
| 2004/C 223/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3528 — SWISS RE/LAHC) (1) | 20 |
| 2004/C 223/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3506 — FOX PAINE/ADVANTA) (1) | 20 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 223/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 223/2

State aid — Belgium — Aid C 76/2003 ex NN 69/2003 — Reduction of a VAT debt owed by Umicore SA (formerly Union Minière SA) — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

2

2004/C 223/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3351 — ARVINMERITOR/VOLVO (Axle Assets)) (1)

19

2004/C 223/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3528 — SWISS RE/LAHC) (1)

20

2004/C 223/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3506 — FOX PAINE/ADVANTA) (1)

20

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 223/6 | Notice | s3 |

2004/C 223/6

Notice

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 
Commission Monthly Case Activity for April 2015 
 
 
   
1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month  

 33 
 
  
 
2. Cases Added to Docket  
 
Coper Tire & Rubber Co.  
No. 11-1588 
Direction for Review on 04/21/15 
 
Missouri Basin Well Service Inc. 
No. 13-1817 
Direction for Review on 04/23/15 
 
 
 2 
 
 
3. Cases Subtracted From Docket 
 
Delek Refining, Ltd. 
No. 08-1386 
Decision on 04/23/15 
 
Brand Energy Solutions LLC 
No. 09-1048 
Decision on 04/27/15 
 
Wal-Mart Distribution Center #6016 
No. 08-1292 
Decision on 04/27/25 

 -3 
 
4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 

 32
United States of America
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor
Washington, DC 20036-3457


SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.
OSHRC Docket No. 19-0622
ANTHONY MARANO CO., 

Respondent.


BRIEFING NOTICE
The parties are requested to brief the following issues:
(1)	Did the judge err in affirming Citation 1, Item 1, as a sanction for Respondent’s failure to comply with an order requiring the production of documents for in camera review?
(1) With respect to Citation 1, Item 2, did the judge err in finding the cited standard, 29 C.F.R. § 1910.147(d) (lockout/tagout procedures), applies?  Specifically, the parties are requested to brief the following:
a. Did the judge err in finding that the cited work activities constitute “servicing and/or maintenance” outside of normal production?  See 29 C.F.R. § 1910.147(a)(2)(i), (ii)?
b. Did the judge err in finding the minor servicing exception does not apply?  See 29 C.F.R. § 1910.147(a)(2)(ii)(B) (note)?
(2) Did the judge err in affirming Citation 2, Item 1?
All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.[1]  The first brief is to be filed within 40 days of this notice.  A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission in accordance with Commission Rule 93.  The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service.

						BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION



Dated:	February 16, 2022			/s/					
						John X. Cerveny
						Executive Secretary
---------------------------
[1]
 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies.  The Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party.  Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 107 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2018 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing Reverend Billy Graham to lie in honor in the 

Rotunda of the Capitol. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING REVEREND BILLY GRAHAM TO 

4 LIE IN HONOR IN ROTUNDA OF CAPITOL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Reverend Billy Graham shall be 

6 permitted to lie in honor in the Rotunda of the Capitol 

7 from February 28, 2018, to March 1, 2018. 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 107 RDS 

1 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Architect of the Capitol, 

2 under the direction and supervision of the Speaker of the 

3 House of Representatives and the President pro tempore 

4 of the Senate, shall take the necessary steps to implement 

5 subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives February 23, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 181 (Tuesday, December 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10785]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Byrd).
  The legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                 Washington, DC, December 2, 2008.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the 
     Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable 
     Jon Tester, a Senator from the State of Montana, to perform 
     the duties of the Chair.
                                                   Robert C. Byrd,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. TESTER thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10427]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    AUTHORITY TO SIGN ENROLLED BILLS

  Mr. NELSON of Nebraska. I ask unanimous consent that during recess or 
adjournment of the Senate from Friday, October 3, 2008 through Sunday, 
October 5, 2008, the Senator from Virginia, Mr. Webb, be authorized to 
sign all duly enrolled bills and joint resolutions.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. NELSON of Nebraska. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. LEVIN. I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call 
be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
From: alex <acabillo@hotmail.com>

Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 4:49 PM

To: TASreinterpretation

Subject: Proceed with TAS reinterpretation

Fred Leutner, Please proceed with reinterpretation of TAS for tribes. Alex Cabillo
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 99


Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC


Arthur Andersen LLP has represented to Lodgian, Inc. that its audit of the
consolidated financial statements of Lodgian, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended was subject to Andersen's quality
control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office
consultation.  Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur
Andersen is not relevant to this audit.


/s/ Richard Cartoon
-------------------
Richard Cartoon
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE THIRD
QUARTER 2000 10-Q OF BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         927314
<NAME>                        BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                              92,620
<SECURITIES>                                        34,399
<RECEIVABLES>                                       25,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        120,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   351,070
<PP&E>                                             417,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     895,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              251,218
<BONDS>                                            668,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1
<OTHER-SE>                                        (56,374)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       895,071
<SALES>                                            946,471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   946,471
<CGS>                                              687,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      687,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     38,582
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14,275
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 24,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      (330)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        23,977
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26277]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 25, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 547 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-172, K2025-170.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26277 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```