alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### OLLEN MOBLEY *v.*JOHN A. FOSSETT.

Where an agreement in writing was made for the- exchange of slaves, and one of the parties afterwards refused to complete the contract, *itwashdd*that the latter might, maintain an action of assumpsit on the special agreement.

' This was an action of Assumpsit in which the plaintiff declared upon a special agreement for the exchange of slaves. On the trial at Sampson, on the last circuit, before his Honor Judge Dick,, the proof was as follows: — The defendant being the owner of a slave by the name of Squire, wrote a letter to the plaintiff proposing to exchange Squire with him for either one of two slaves belonging to the plaintiff, by the names of Sam and Balaanc, if the plaintiff would carry one of said slaves to the defendant at Hillsborough. The plaintiff immediately agreed to the proposition, and sent an agent with the slave Sam, and also a bill of sale for him to the defendant, and a letter informing the defendant that he, (the plaintiff) accepted the offer made. The agent on his way met with the defendant in Raleigh, and -handed him the plaintiff’s letter, and at the same time tendered to him; *97the slave Sam, with the bill of sale, and offered *to*liver Sam either at Raleigh or Hillsborough, and receive in exchange the slave Squire, according to the agreement. The defendant then refused to take Sam, and.declared that he would not receive him at any place, nor would he deliver Squire. Upon this evidence the Judge directed a nonsuit, on the ground that the plaintiff had misconceived his action- — that he ought to have brought either trover or detinue: whereupon the plaintiff appealed.

where a party is bound by his agree-make'a ‘cnnr¿[i(?|fe at a parti- and'the06’ othel Party apprises him that he reive the6” au'ft'dfs-penses with the necessity of s!is

June, 1838.

*Strange,*for the plaintiff.

No counsel appeared for the defendant.

Daniel, Judge.

After stating the case, proceeded as follows : — The mode of contracting for this species of property, prescribed by the act of 1819, (1 Rev. stat. c. 50. sec. 8,) that is, in writing signed &c., was complied with by the parties. The defendant’s positively refusing to take the ic i. i , , P „ , slave Sam at all, dispensed with the necessity oí a tender of him at Hillsborough, 2 Stark. on Ev. 778. Whether the plaintiff had a right to bring trover or detinue, it seems to us, not necessary to determine; for if he had, he might waive such right, and bring assumpsit to recover damages for a refusal to deliver Squire according to the contract when de- ..... . . manded. Mr. Starkie in his treatise on evidence (2 vol. 886,) says, *“*An action by the vendee of goods, is either on a special contract for not delivering the goods, (assumpsit;) or of detinue; or of trover for a *conversion;*or of money had t • j • -, j *'*and received upon a rescinded contract; or upon a warranty,” Here, the plaintiff elected to bring assumpsit, and to declare on the breach of the special contract to deliver the slave Squire. We think the action was sustainable. The nonsuit must be set aside, and a new trial had.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.
Ricardo J. Vázquez Rivera

PO Box 1839 Guaynabo, PR 00970-1839 Tel. (787) 457-5907

rvazquez@decontpr.com

EDUCATION

PRESIDIO GRADUATE SCHOOL May 2009

MBA in Sustainability San Francisco, California

WEST LIBERTY COLLEGE June 2006 

Emerging Minority Business Leaders Program (EMBL) Wheeling, West Virginia

in Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property Management, 

Business Development and Commercialization of Technology

 

UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO May 2006

Mayagüez Campus Mayagüez, PR

Bachelor of Arts in Economics 

 

EXPERIENCE

DECONT CORP. January 2007-Present

Chief Executive Officer Guaynabo, PR

Worked on permits for 11 acres to establish a concrete and asphalt recycling plant, negotiated contracts with 

suppliers and partner, created a business plan and marketing campaign, execute sales, acquire and introduce 

brands like Ecobust and Aquaphalt, manage Decont’s brand and oversee all business units on a day to day basis. 

AGRO-TURISM RESEARCH Jan - May 2006

Research Assistant Mayagüez, PR

Performed surveys in a variety of Mayagüez, PR communities to obtain population demographics. 

Worked on the feasibility study in order to determine if agricultural jobs were created, and if poverty could be 

alleviated in Mayagüez.

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. Summer of 2005

Finance Department San Juan, PR

Charged insurance policy amounts to agents and clients, financed insurance contracts, balanced check and cash 

accounts and recorded finance department transactions.

SEMINARS & WORKSHOPS

BUILDING NEW VENTURES January 2007 

Professor Lynda Applegate from Harvard Business School San Juan, PR

Analyzing Business Models, Idea Generation Tools and Jumpstarting Innovation.

ENTERPRISE PERFORMANCE November 2006

“The Language of Leadership”: Breakdowns, Fundamental Elements of a Promise, San Juan, PR

Level of Trustworthiness, Conversation for Action, Assertions vs. Assessments and

Canonical Conversations for Moods 

 

OTHER INVOLVEMENTS 

Association of Students of Economics – UPR - Mayaguez – President, Guest Speaker at the Concrete Ready 

Mix Association Monthly Lunch, Volleyball Junior Olympics- 1996-2000, Team Captain and All Star Team 

member-1999, President of Young Contractors Committee (2013), President of Information Technology 

Committee and Board Member (2015) of the Association of General Contractors of America – Puerto Rico 

Chapter, Armorer’s Certification for Sig Sauer Semi-Auto Pistols. 

SKILLS

Fully bilingual (English and Spanish) and proficiency using Excel, Power Point, Publisher, Word, Outlook, 

Pages, Keynote and Numbers (Apple).
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation for the quarter ended September 30,
2003, I, P. Chrisman Iribe, President Indiantown Cogeneration Funding
Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                                                              
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation

|                  |  |                                                                         | 
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|November 13, 2003 |  | /s/ P. CHRISMAN IRIBE                                                  
|                  |  |                                                                        
|                  |  | P. Chrisman Iribe
President
Indiantown Cogeneration
Funding Corporation

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation and will be retained by
Indiantown Cogeneration Funding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

Commission Monthly Case Activity for February 2010 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 26 

2. Cases Added to Docket 2 

Nuprecon, LP 

Docket No. 08-1037 

Direction For Review on 2/13/10 

Burrows Paper Corp. 

Docket No. 09-1559 

Direction for Review on 2/19/10 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket -1 

Mosser Construction, Inc. 

No. 08-0631 

Decision issued on 2/23/10 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 27
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011
-NM - 021
- AD Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Presidential Documents

88867 

Federal Register 

Vol. 89, No. 217 

Friday, November 8, 2024 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of November 7, 2024 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 

On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States 

posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons 

(weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. 

On July 28, 1998, by Executive Order 13094, the President amended Executive 

Order 12938 to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat of weapons 

of mass destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, by Executive 

Order 13382, the President, among other things, further amended Executive 

Order 12938 to improve our ability to combat proliferation. The proliferation 

of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them continues 

to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 

policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, with 

respect to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means 

of delivering such weapons must continue beyond November 14, 2024. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency 

declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 7, 2024. 

[FR Doc. 2024–26226 

Filed 11–7–24; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-O0BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
DATOS

RÁPIDOS

Departamento del Trabajo de EE.UU.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA

Para información más completa:

Administración de

Seguridad y Salud

Ocupacional

Astilladoras

Seguridad

Las astilladoras cortan ramas de árboles en

pedazos pequeños. Los riesgos surgen cuando

los operarios se acercan demasiado o hacen

contacto con las astilladora. El contacto con los componentes de una astilladora en funcionamiento (cuchillas, discos o cuchillos) puede tener como resultado una

amputación o la muerte. Los operarios también pueden ser

lesionados por el material que sale de la máquina. Para

reducir estos riesgos, use los controles de ingeniería y prácticas de trabajo apropiados, incluyendo la capacitación de

los operarios.

Riesgos

• Operarios teniendo contacto o siendo halados hacia dentro de la astilladora.

• Pérdida de audición.

• Lesiones en la cara, ojos, cabeza o manos.

Prácticas deTrabajo Seguras

• Nunca ponga las manos adentro de una astilladora mientras esté en funcionamiento.

• No use ropa holgada alrededor de una astilladora.

• Siga siempre las recomendaciones e instrucciones de

seguridad del manufacturero.

• Use tapones para oídos, gafas de seguridad, casco de

seguridad y guantes.

• Los trabajadores deben estar adiestrados en la operación

segura de las astilladoras. Siempre supervise a los trabajadores nuevos que usen astilladoras para asegurarse

que ellos trabajan de manera segura y que nunca se

ponen en peligro o ponen en peligro a otros.

• Protéjase de contactar los componentes de astilladoras

en funcionamiento poniendo guardas en los puntos de

alimentación y descarga, y evitando que se abran las

cubiertas o puertas de acceso hasta que el tambor o

disco se detenga completamente.

• Evite que remolques desconectados de las astilladoras

rueden o se deslicen en áreas inclinadas poniéndole calzos a las ruedas del remolque.

• Mantenga una distancia segura (o sea, el largo de 2

árboles o troncos) entre trabajos con astilladoras y otros

trabajos en árboles/trabajadores.

• Cuando se esté dando servicio o mantenimiento a equipo

de astillar (o sea, desatascándolo) use el sistema de candado para asegurarse de que el equipo esté desactivado.
United States of America
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1120 20  Street, N.W., Ninth Floorth
Washington, DC 20036-3457


SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v. OSHRC Docket No. 16-1029

CALDWELL TANKS, INC.,
Respondent.

BRIEFING NOTICE
 The Commission requests the parties to address the following questions on review of the
administrative law judge’s decision:
1. Does the cited provision of the welding standard (29 C.F.R.
§ 1926.353(b)(1)) presume that a hazard exists “whenever welding, cutting,
or heating is performed in a confined space”?
In briefing this issue, the parties are asked to address the meaning of the
term “confined space” in the cited provision and whether the Secretary’s
interpretation  of  the  term  is  reasonable  and  entitled  to  deference.  The
parties  should  also  specifically  discuss  how  the  meaning  of  “confined
space,” as used in the cited provision, was affected, if at all, by OSHA’s
later  promulgation  and  revocation  of  29  C.F.R  § 1926.21(b)(6)(ii)  and
OSHA’s  promulgation  of  the  Confined  Spaces  in  Construction  standard
(Part 1926–Subpart AA). See 37 Fed. Reg. 3512, 3514 (February 17, 1972);
80 Fed. Reg. 25366, 25518-19 (May 4, 2015).
2. Did the Secretary provide sufficient notice of his interpretation of the cited
provision?
The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the
Commission on review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review.  Accordingly,
the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.

[pict][pict]

1
 All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.   The first brief is to be
filed within 40 days of this notice.  A party that does not intend to file a brief must notify the
Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing briefs,
and shall serve a copy on all other parties.  The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of intent)
of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service.
BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated:  May 18, 2018 /s/
 John X. Cerveny
 Executive Secretary



1
The  Commission  requests  that  all  briefs  include  an  alphabetical  table  of  authorities  with
references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand
margin  of  the  table  to  indicate  those  authorities  on  which  the  brief  principally  relies.    The
Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal
articles and  legal  treatises,  be  provided  to  the Commission  and  to  the opposing  party.    Parties
should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
2
CHARLESL.GRECO,PresidentMARKKNIGHT,SeniorVicePresidentARTDANIEL,VicePresidentJOSEPHM.STELLA,TreasurerSTEPHENE.SANDHERR,ChiefExecutiveOfficerDAVIDLUKENS,ChiefOperatingOfficerMarch26,2015DocketManagementFacilityAGCofAmericaTHEASSOCIATEDGENERALCONTRACTORSOFAMERICAQualityPeople.QualityProjects.U.S.DepartmentofTransportation,1200NewJerseyAvenueS.E.,W12-140,Washington,DC20590-0001RE:DocketNo.DOT-OST-2015-0013DearDocketClerk:Onbehalfofthemorethan26,000memberorganizationsoftheAssociatedGeneralContractorsofAmerica(AGCLIwritetorequestanextensionofthecommentperiodfortheDepartmentofTransportation's(DOT)NoticeofProposedRulemakingonGeographic-BasedHiringPreferencesinAdministeringFederalAwards,publishedMarch6,2015at80FR12092.AGCrepresentscontractorsthatperformconstructionservicesforstateandlocalDOTs,localtransitagenciesandforotherpublicagenciesthatreceivefederalassistancefromtheFederalHighwayAdministration(FHWA)andtheFederalTransitAdministration(FTA).TheproposedpilotprogramandadditionalproposaltoalterFHWAandFTAregulationstoallowtheuseoflocalresidencypreferenceswillhaveasignificantimpactonAGCmemberfirmsnationwide.Ourmembersandchaptersareonlynowbecomingawareofthisproposalandbelieveitisimportanttoexpresstheiropinionsabouttheimpactofthisproposalontheiroperations.Theproposed30daycommentperiodwillstiflemeaningfulcommentfromtheindustryandweurgethatitbeextendedanadditional30days,ataminimum.Thankyouforconsiderationofthisrequest.AGClooksforwardtosubmittingcommentsontheproposalandbelievesthattheadditionaltimewillallowforamorethoroughreviewoftheproposalbyaffectedpartiesSincerely,BrianDeerySeniorDirectorHighwayandTransportationDivision2300WilsonBlvd.,Suite300•Arlington,VA22201-3308Phone:703.548.3118•Fax:703.837.5400•www.agc.org
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for January 2014

1.Cases Pending Beginning of Month 38
2.Cases Added to Docket 

Jim Boyd Construction, Inc. 
No. 11-2559
Direction for Review on 1/22/14

1
3.Cases Subtracted From Docket

M.V.P. Piping Co., Inc.
No. 12-1233
Decision on 1/22/14

All Erection & Crane Rental Corp.
No. 09-1451
Decision on 1/23/14

-24.Total Cases Pending End of Month37
### Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = EWR

Holder = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future) 12/21/2010 07:51:47



### Query Parameters:

### 12/21/2010 07:51:47

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Holders)

Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 54

ABX ABX AIR 2

ACA AIR CANADA 24

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 4

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 6

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 882

CSQ CARGOJET 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 32

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 1

EVA EVA AIRLINES 2

FDX FED EX 9

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 27

MEP MIDWEST AIRLINES (MIDWEST EXPRESS 10

NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 32

POE PORTER AIRLINES 14

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 2

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 4

TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 13

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 33

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 16

USA US AIRWAYS 31

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 4

WJA WESTJET 2

Page 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 97-20098

_____________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: MBM INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE L P; IN THE MATTER OF: MATZ REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC., IN THE MATTER OF: INTERMARQUE AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS, INC. Debtors.

___________________________________________
STEWART A. FELDMAN AND MARLA B. MATZ, D.D.S., Appellants-Cross-Appellees,
VERSUS

NIEL MORGAN, Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CV-2489)

______________________________________________________ December 10, 1997 Before DAVIS, JONES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * This appeal brings before us the propri ety of the district
court's January 14, 1997 order directing the Feldma ns to pay sanctions to Morgan in the amount of $253,700. This sanction2

followed the order of the bankruptcy court imposing sanctions that totalled $499,700. The district court has broad discretion to determine an appropriate sanctio n to obtain compliance with its order. The district court did not abuse its discretion in requiring Feldman to pay sanctions in the amount of $253,000. Although Feldman complains of earlier orders issued by the bankruptcy court, he did not prosecute timely appeals from those orders and they are therefore not properly before us.
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2365]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               HONORING THE LEWIS AND CLARK TRAILBLAZERS

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JOHN SHIMKUS

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, December 10, 2008

  Mr. SHIMKUS. Madam Speaker, today I rise to pay tribute to an 
outstanding group of women from Lewis and Clark Community College who 
last week completed an amazing soccer season by winning the National 
Junior College Athletic Association Division 1 National Championship.
  The Lewis and Clark Trailblazers defeated previously unbeaten Darton 
College by a score of 3-2 on November 3, 2008 to cap off a 27-1 season, 
thereby setting an NJCAA record for most wins in a single season.
  My congratulations go to head coach Tim Rooney, assistant coaches 
Ryan Hodge and Meghan Rooney, and the members of the 2008 National 
Champion Trailblazers: Taylor Bivens, Nicole Yaun, Brittany St. John, 
Liz Pivin, Molly Kellett, Meredith Morkel, Sarah Schultenhenrich, Kim 
Kahre, Bridget Belli, Kaylee Neutzling, Jennifer Vandever, Mallory 
Morkel, Kelly Musenfechter, Bianca Busch, Jessica Randazzo, Emily 
Winschel, Jamie Beuhrle, Kristin Pelley, Emily Silorski, and Danielle 
Lucks.
  These women represented themselves, their families and their 
community in a first-class fashion, and I wish them all the best in 
their future endeavors, both on and off the field.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32



                 OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Tix Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

    (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                  /s/ MITCHELL J. FRANCIS
Date:  November 16, 2005                     By:  ___________________________
                                                  Mitchell J. Francis
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer



    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.