alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 9:57 PM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Srivastava, Ravi; Tsirigotis, Peter

Subject: RE: Deliverables for Tuesday, April 8

Thanks Bob!

I’ll see you tomorrow!

Regards, Cortney

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 6:59 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Srivastava, Ravi; Tsirigotis, Peter; Wayland, Robertj

Subject: Deliverables for Tuesday, April 8

Cortney -

Attached please find the Powerpoint slides for tomorrow's 1 pm discussion with you and the interagency group, and the State Goals TSD and Appendix. Please let either Kevin or me know if you have any questions/concerns. We look forward to meeting with you and the group tomorrow.

thanx!

bob Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code D243-01 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

Office: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov*****************************************

DRAFT/Deliberative Document - FOIA EXEMPT

*****************************************

<< 4-9 OMB briefing - final 3 pm.pptx >> << TSD for goal setting (Draft April 7).docx >> << appendix1 (April 1).xlsx >>
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Li Shaoming, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      January 7, 2010
                /s/
      Li ShaomingBy:
      Li ShaomingIts:
      Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jonathan Sandelman, state and attest that:



|1. | I am the President of Main Place Funding, LLC (the Registrant).
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the
Report) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods
presented.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Jonathan Sandelman
|Jonathan Sandelman    
|President             
|August 13, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26238]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Department of Veterans Affairs National Academic Affiliations 
Council, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. ch. 10, that the VA National 
Academic Affiliations Council (NAAC) will meet via conference call on 
December 4, 2024, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m., eastern standard time. The 
meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Council is to advise the Secretary on matters 
affecting partnerships between VA and its academic affiliates.
    On December 4, 2024, the Council will receive project updates and 
have discussions on actions affecting the educational mission of VA. 
The Council will receive oral public comments from 2:25 p.m. to 2:55 
p.m. EST.
    Interested persons may attend and/or present oral statements to the 
Council.
    The dial in number to attend the conference call is: 669 254 5252. 
At the prompt, enter meeting ID 161 789 6622, then press #. The meeting 
passcode is 267962 then press #. Individuals seeking to present oral 
statements are invited to submit a 1-2-page summary of their comments 
at the time of the meeting for inclusion in the official meeting 
record. Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or less, 
depending on the number of participants. Interested parties may also 
provide written comments for review by the Council prior to the meeting 
or at any time, by email to [email protected], or by mail to 
Nellie Mitchell, MS, RHIA, Designated Federal Officer, Office of 
Academic Affiliations (14AA), 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20420. Any member of the public wishing to participate or seeking 
additional information should contact Ms. Mitchell via email or by 
phone at 608-358-9902.

    Dated: November 7, 2024.
Jelessa M. Burney,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-26238 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
#### JAMES PAGE *v.*GREENBERRY WINNINGHAM.

A defendant, who has given bond under the act of 1822, eh. 3, for the relief of insolvent debtors, cannot object to the informality of the bond, and pray a discharge on account thereof.

When this Court affirms the judgment of the Superior Court, ordering a defendant in a off. sa. to be imprisoned, it directs a *procedendo*to the Court below, to carry the judgment into effect.

This case came on before his honour Judge Seawell, at Randolph, on the last Circuit, when it appeared, that the defendant had been arrested under a *ca. sa.,*at the instance of Smitherman and Page, for the use of James Page, and had given a bond with security, payable to James Page alone, conditioned for “ his personal appearance before the Justices of the County Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions, to be held for the county of Randolph, at the Court-house in Ashborough, on the first Monday of August next, then and there to stand and abide by such proceedings as may be had by the Court, in relation to his taking the benefit of the law, provided for the relief of debtors in certain cases.” Upon the appearance of the defendant in the County-Court, his counsel moved for his discharge, upon the ground that-the appearance bond was illegal and void, being made payable to James Page alone, instead of Smitherman and Page, and for other defects in its condition, whereupon the Court ordered the defendant to be discharged, and the plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court. His honour held, that “ it was not competent for the defendant to object to the informality of the bond, which by the act of assembly he is required to tender for his release from confinement,” and reversed the order of the County Court, and adjudged that the defendant should be imprisoned until he should be discharged therefrom by due proceeding of law. From this the defendant appealed.

No counsel appeared for the defendant.

*Mendenhall,*for the plaintiff.

Gaston, Judge.

— The Court affirms the judgment which has been rendered in this case in the Superior *114Court. Wede em it unnecessary tó say more in support or explanation of the grounds of this decision, than to refer to those set forth in the opinion of the Judge below, of which we entirely approve.

In general, this Court enforces by its own process the execution of its own judgments; but as the defendant is not in person before us, and if he were, from the constitution of the Court, the ulterior proceedings, which *may*follow upon the judgment affirmed, could not be here had, we direct that in this case a *procedendo*issue to the Superior Court of Randolph, to cause the judgment there rendered and here affirmed, to be carried into effect.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary information extracted from the March 31,
     2000 10-Q for Main Place Funding, LLC and is qualified in its entirety by
     reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         976,064
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,000,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,707,098
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          36,497
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            36,440
<LOANS>                                     11,902,905
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (35,865)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,735,143
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,404,284
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             98,082
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,999,962
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,232,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              19,735,143
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                217,831
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               48,795
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                75,562
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               342,188
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,878
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          243,310
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,065
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                236,245
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     236,245
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        6,926
<NET-INCOME>                                   157,261
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     76,496
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                35,988
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (123)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               35,865
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            35,865
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26340]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
420 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-215, K2025-213.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26340 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2335]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    IN HONOR OF PARLIAMENTARIANS FOR NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION AND 
                              DISARMAMENT

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, November 20, 2008

  Mr. KUCINICH. Madam Speaker, I rise today in honor of 
Parliamentarians for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament (PNND) 
and in recognition of their dedication to educating and engaging 
parliamentarians around the world to promote nuclear non-proliferation.
  PNND is an international non-partisan network devoted to establishing 
channels of communication between parliamentarians around the world and 
to providing them with current nuclear weapons policies in order to 
raise awareness for the need to abolish the use of nuclear weapons. 
Currently, PNND's membership consists of over 500 parliamentarians from 
over 70 countries worldwide who are engaged in nuclear non-
proliferation initiatives. This year, PNND marked the 40th anniversary 
of the International Non-Proliferation Treaty with the Nuclear Weapons 
Convention initiative--a declaration presented by the European 
Parliamentarian section of PNND. The Nuclear Weapons Convention is an 
initiative dedicated to promoting multilateral negotiations that would 
lead to the elimination of nuclear weapons. I join with the members of 
PNND in supporting this important initiative.
  Madam Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honor of 
Parliamentarians for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament, and in 
recognition of their dedication to promoting disarmament and 
international human rights.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,075
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         58,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,291)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,081
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,539
<CGS>                                            2,756
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,084
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,081)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,081)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.45)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          24,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  217,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (223)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               264,225
<PP&E>                                          67,235
<DEPRECIATION>                                (38,590)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 293,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          244,787
<BONDS>                                          9,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              422
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   293,048
<SALES>                                      3,995,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,996,659
<CGS>                                        3,976,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,987,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  75
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,683
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,387
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.51


</TABLE>
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/23

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

 Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant, 

v. OSHRC Docket Nos. 09-0004 & 09-0005 

STARK EXCAVATING, INC., 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE 

The Commission requests that the parties brief the following issues. 

Docket No. 09-0004 

(1) With respect to Serious Citation 1, Item 1b, did the judge err in finding that 

Respondent knew its employee did not wear required eye protection that complied 

with the specifications of 29 C.F.R. § 1926.102(a)(2)? 

(2) With respect to Willful Citation 2, Item 1, alleging that Respondent failed to 

provide adequate excavation protection in violation of 29 C.F.R. 

§ 1926.652(a)(1): 

(a) Did the judge err in rejecting Respondent’s unpreventable employee 

misconduct (“UEM”) defense? 

(b) If the judge properly affirmed the alleged violation, did he err in 

recharacterizing it as serious? 

(3) With respect to Repeat Citation 3, Item 1, alleging that Respondent placed a spoil 

pile and equipment too close to the edge of an excavation in violation of 29 

C.F.R. § 1926.651(j)(2), did the judge err in rejecting Respondent’s UEM 

defense? 

Docket No. 09-0005 

(1) With respect to Willful Citation 1, Item 2, alleging that Respondent failed to 

provide adequate excavation protection in violation of 29 C.F.R. 

§ 1926.652(a)(1): 

(a) Did the judge err in finding that Respondent failed to comply with the 

requirements of the cited provision and in rejecting Respondent’s UEM 
defense? 

(b) If the judge properly affirmed the alleged violation, did he err in 

recharacterizing it as serious? 

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1

 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefore within the applicable time for filing 

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of 

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: June 28, 2010 /s/________________________________ 

 Ray H. Darling, Jr. 

 Executive Secretary 

 

1

 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate. 

2