alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134432 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134432 

 COA: 269785 

Marquette CC: 04-042159-FH

JEFFREY WAYNE ROEDER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. Although the 

trial court improperly instructed the jury that it could consider MRE 404(b) testimony for 

the limited purpose of judging the believability of the testimony contrary to this Court’s 

explicit instruction in People v Sabin (After Remand), 463 Mich 43, 69-70 (2000), 

defendant has failed to demonstrate prejudicial error where the prosecution presented a 

strong case against him, and the MRE 404(b) evidence was properly admitted to show 

defendant’s system, plan, or scheme in committing the acts. 

d1128 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 5, 2007 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30,2005 of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RobertC. Caller, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.                 The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| Dated: October 31, 2006                                       |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ ROBERT C. CALLER                                               |   |
| Robert C. Caller                                                   |
| *Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,560
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                       822
<INVENTORY>                                     11,602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,643
<PP&E>                                          10,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            70
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,226
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,962
<SALES>                                        168,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,052
<CGS>                                          130,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   193
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (97)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,157)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (25,342)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,499)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.49)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1642

ROBERT J. MORGAN, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

BRITTANY WOODS HOMEOWNER’S ASSOCIATION, INC.; TALIS 

MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cv-00291-D) 

Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Robert J. Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Alan Collins, BAILEY & DIXON, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Robert J. Morgan seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ 

motion for judgment on the pleadings in his civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment 

or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 14, 2019. The notice 

of appeal was filed on June 14, 2019, one day late. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(1). Because 

Morgan failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the 

appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Tax Indemnity Letters



 Exhibit 10.21 

Column A 
 Column B 

Column C 
 Re: Tax
Payables 
 Dear Column D: 

In connection with that certain Loan Agreement, Equity Pledge Agreement and Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement entered into among Column B,
Shanghai Mecox Lane Information Technology Co., Ltd. (“ML Information Technology”) and Mai Wang Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. on the date hereof (the “Agreements”), ML Information Technology will reimburse Column
B for any and all taxes payable by Column B arising from the transactions contemplated under the Agreements. 
  

			
	 Sincerely,
  

Shanghai Mecox Lane Information Technology Co., Ltd.
  

[seal: Shanghai Mecox Lane Information Technology Co., Ltd.]

	
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
	
	/s/ Column B
	(Signature of Column B)
	
	By: Column B

  

 








													
	 	  	 Column A
	  	 Column B
	  	 Column C
	  	 Column D
	  	 Column E
	  	 Column F

							
	 1
	  	Feb ___, 2008	  	Xu Yi	  	Room 701, No. 2, Lane 925, South Zhong Shan Road
(2nd), Shanghai, China	  	Mr. Xu	  	ML Information Technology	  	 Mai
 Wang Trading (Shanghai)
Co., Ltd.

							
	 2
	  	Jan
15th, 2010	  	Zhang Bang	  	Room 1408, No. 29, Shui Yin Road, Yue Xiu District, Guangzhou, China	  	Mr. Zhang	  	ML Information Technology	  	 Mai
 Wang Trading (Shanghai)
Co., Ltd.

							
	 3
	  	July 20, 2010	  	Pu Sijie	  	No. 118, Lane 910, Weihai Road, Shanghai, China	  	Mr. Pu
Amendment to State Implementation Plan for the Removal of the Clean Fuel Fleet Program: Submitted January 2015 

Note: The Letter and the Attachments are available from the links below. 

• Amendment to State Implementation Plan for the Removal of the Clean Fuel Fleet Program

• Attachments 

◦ Attachment A: Supporting Documentation for 110(l) and 193 Demonstration Georgia Chapter 391-1-22, 

Georgia’s Clean Fueled Fleet Rules 

◦ Attachment B: July 2, 2004, Leila H. Cook Memo: Clean Fuel Fleet Program

◦ Attachment B: July 21, 2005, Memo to Manufacturers: Clean Fuel Vehicle Standards

◦ Attachment B: April 17, 2006, Leila H. Cook Memo to Air Directors: Clean Fuel Fleet Program Requirements

◦ Attachment C: Clean Fuel Fleet Rule Package, Rule 

◦ Attachment C: Clean Fuel Fleet Rule Package, Synopsis & Rationale

Page 1 of 1

file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Documentum/CTS/docbases/ProDocbase/config/temp_sessions/493721656... 7/13/2015
#### CHARLES L. TORRENCE *vs*JOHN KERNS et al.

This was an appeal from the judgment of Rowan Superior Court, at Fall Term, 1841, and the case is precisely the same as that of *McNamara*v *Kerns*above reported.

*Badger for*the plaintiff.

*Barringer'*for the defendant.

Per Curiam.

This case is governed by that of McNamara *v*the same defendants. There must therefore be the same judgment in it.

Judgment accordingly.
Exhibit 10.26


 


Creditor Claims and Debt
Assignment Agreement


 


This CLAIMS AND DEBT ASSIGNMENT
AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made on June 25, 2010 by and among:


 


Party A: International Petroleum
Services Corporation Limited


 


Party B:   Liu Qingzeng (PRC ID Card No.:
132903195912096511)


 


Party C:  Tianjin New Highland Science Development Co., Ltd.


 


WHEREAS,


 


(1)  Party B has creditor
claims against Party A in the amount of HKD242,613,954;


 


(2)  Party C has creditor
claims against Party B in the amount of RMB156,785,948;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, upon friendly
consultations, the parties agree as follows in respect of the foregoing
creditor claims and debts:


 


1. 
Party B shall waive an amount of HKD179,579,489 out of its forgoing
creditor claims against Party A.


 


2. 
In consideration of Paragraph 1 above, Party B shall assign its debt in
respect of Party C to Party A, which shall be responsible for repaying such
RMB156,785,948 to Party C.


 


3. 
As from the effective date hereof, the balance of Party B’s creditor
claims against Party A shall be in the amount of HKD63,034,465 only and Party B
shall become clear and free of any debt to Party C.


 


4. This Agreement shall be executed
in three copies and each party shall hold one copy. This Agreement shall become
effective as from the date of execution and sealing.


 


(No Operative Text Below)


 

















 


(Signature Page)


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have each duly executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.


 


 


Party A


 


International Petroleum Services
Corporation Limited (Seal)


 


	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  (Authorized Representative)

  	
   

  



 


 


Party B


 


	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  (Liu Qingzeng)

  	
   

  



 


 


Party C


 


Tianjin New Highland Science
Development Co., Ltd. (Seal)


 


	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  (Authorized Representative)

  	
   

  



 


2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 471 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 471

  Designating the week of May 15 through May 21, 2016, as ``National 
                          Public Works Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2016

    Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mrs. Boxer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of May 15 through May 21, 2016, as ``National 
                          Public Works Week''.

Whereas public works infrastructure, facilities, and services are of vital 
        importance to the health, safety, and well-being of the people of the 
        United States;
Whereas the public works infrastructure, facilities, and services could not be 
        provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, 
        including engineers and administrators, who represent State and local 
        governments throughout the United States;
Whereas public works professionals design, build, operate, and maintain the 
        transportation systems, water infrastructure, sewage and refuse disposal 
        systems, public buildings, and other structures and facilities that are 
        vital to the people and communities of the United States; and
Whereas understanding the role that public infrastructure plays in protecting 
        the environment, improving public health and safety, contributing to 
        economic vitality, and enhancing the quality of life of every community 
        of the United States is in the interest of the people of the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of May 15 through May 21, 2016, as 
        ``National Public Works Week'';
            (2) recognizes and celebrates the important contributions 
        that public works professionals make every day to improve--
                    (A) the public infrastructure of the United States; 
                and
                    (B) the communities that public works professionals 
                serve; and
            (3) urges individuals and communities throughout the United 
        States to join with representatives of the Federal Government 
        and the American Public Works Association in activities and 
        ceremonies that are designed--
                    (A) to pay tribute to the public works 
                professionals of the United States; and
                    (B) to recognize the substantial contributions that 
                public works professionals make to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-81,473-01
EX P ARTE JOSE P H WAYNE G ILLIL AND, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1413241-A IN THE 182 DISTRICT COURT N D F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Ap p l i cant was convicted of possession of marihuana and sentenc ed to six months’ imprisonment in a state jail fac ility
. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that post conviction testing of the s u b s ta n c e s reve al that he possessed less than four ounces of marihuana , and that there is insufficient evidenc e to suppor t his conviction for a felony
. He also argues that the new test results prove he is actua lly innocent. The S t at e and trial2

court agree that there is “no evidenc e” to s up p o rt the judgme nt, and Applicant that is entitled to relief
. We agree . Applicant is entitled to habea s relief , but h e has not car

ried his burden to prove he is actua lly innocent. The “ac tual innocenc e” term applies in Texas case s “only in circ umstances in which an ac cu s ed did not, in fac t, commit the charg ed offe nse or any of the lesser- included offe nses.” State v. W

ilson , 324 S.W .3d 595, 598 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Her e, Applicant has proven he should not have been convicted of the g reater offe nse of state jail felony possession of marihuana to which he pleade d. But he has also proven that he is guilty of the lesser- included offe nse of misdemeanor possession of marihuana
. Though he is not “ac tually innocent,” Applicant is entitled to relief. State v. W

ilson , 324 S.W .3d 595 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Relief is grante d. The judgment in Cause No. 141324101010 in the 182 District Court of n d Har ris County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Har ris County to answe r the charg es as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any neces s ary b ench
war rant within 10 day s after

the mandate of this Court issues. Co p ies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal Ju s ti c e
–Co r r e c ti o n a l Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Fe bruar

y 25, 2015 Do not publish
向所有工人提供有关热病的培训。

制定紧急计划。

'

t"'I 

了解更多信息:

1-800-321-0SHA {6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov/heat 

联邦法律赋予工人在安全工作场所工作的权利。工人对危险有权

发言,而不必担心遭到报复。访问www.osha.gov/workers,了解

如何向OSHA提交保密投诉,并要求检查。

1-800-321-0SHA (6742) I TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov/heat

OSHA 4296-08 2023 

Heat Illness 

Prevention 

在高温下安全工作

室内和户外工作人员有患热病的风险。

热病是可以预防的

0 0 

...... 

喝凉水 休息 寻找阴凉处

可能的情况下穿

浅色、宽松的衣服

互相监测 有些设备可能会增加

您对高温的暴露

`

o

u 

,
如果工人发生:

头痛或恶心 虚弱或头晕 大量出汗

皮肤干热 口渴 尿量减少

体温高

采取以下措施:

·喝水

·脱掉不必要的衣服

·转移到凉爽的地方并使用风扇

(如有)

·用水和冰冷却

·不要让患者独处

·如果有疑问,请拨打 911

道[ 朕疗紧急情况的体征

, 说话含糊不清

? 

忠维或钉刀异帘 VV

痛性发作

意识丧失

1. 立即拨打 911

立即用水或冰为工人降温

3. 脱掉不必要的衣服并喝凉水

4. 留在工人身边,直到救援人员抵达
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         Alabama National BanCorporation
                  Computation of Earnings Per Share (Unaudited)
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
                    ----------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                      Per Share
                                                              Income        Shares      Amount
                                                              ------        ------    ---------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>       <C>
 THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001
 Basic EPS net income.....................................    $ 7,508        11,846       $ 0.63
                                                                                          ======
 Effect of dilutive securities............................         --           289
                                                              -------        ------
 Diluted EPS..............................................    $ 7,508        12,135       $ 0.62
                                                              =======        ======       ======

 THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
 Basic EPS net income.....................................    $ 6,556        11,782       $ 0.56
                                                                                          ======
 Effect of dilutive securities............................         --           172
                                                              -------        ------
 Diluted EPS..............................................    $ 6,556        11,954       $ 0.55
                                                              =======        ======       ======

 NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001
 Basic EPS net income.....................................    $20,327        11,819       $ 1.72
                                                                                          ======
 Effect of dilutive securities............................         --           297
                                                              -------        ------
 Diluted EPS..............................................    $20,327        12,116       $ 1.68
                                                              =======        ======       ======

 NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
 Basic EPS net income.....................................    $18,730        11,794       $ 1.59
                                                                                          ======
 Effect of dilutive securities............................         --           162
                                                              -------        ------
 Diluted EPS..............................................    $18,730        11,956       $ 1.57
                                                              =======        ======       ======
</TABLE>
ACCEPTED04-14-00620-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALSSAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/1/2015 3:05:08 PMKEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

            FILED IN4th COURT OF APPEALS  SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS7/1/2015 3:05:08 PM    KEITH E. HOTTLE              Clerk
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 578 

Supporting Lights On Afterschool, a national celebration of afterschool 

programs held on October 20, 2016. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Ms. MIKULSKI, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting Lights On Afterschool, a national celebration of 

afterschool programs held on October 20, 2016. 

Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States 

have parents who work outside the home; 

Whereas high-quality programs that expand learning opportunities for children, such as afterschool, before-school, 

summer, and expanded learning opportunities, provide 

safe, challenging, engaging, and fun learning experiences, 

including experiences that encourage science, technology, 

engineering, and math, that help children and youth develop social, emotional, physical, cultural, and academic 

skills; 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 578 IS 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs and high-quality 

expanded learning opportunities provide students with 

hands-on, engaging lessons that are aligned with the 

school day; 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs complement regular and expanded school days, and support working families by ensuring that the children of those families are 

safe and productive during the hours parents are working; 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs engage families, 

schools, and diverse community partners in advancing the 

well-being of children and youth in the United States; 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs that partner with 

high-quality community-based organizations build stronger communities by integrating the school with the larger 

community; 

Whereas Lights On Afterschool, a national celebration of 

afterschool, before-school, summer, and expanded learning opportunities programs, held on October 20, 2016, 

highlights the critical importance of those high-quality 

programs to children, their families, and their communities; and 

Whereas nearly 2 in 5 afterschool programs report that their 

budgets are in worse condition in 2016 than at the height 

of the recession in 2008, and more than 3 in 5 afterschool programs report that their level of funding is lower 

than it was in 2013, making it difficult for afterschool 

programs across the United States to keep their doors 

open and their lights on: Now, therefore, be it 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•SRES 578 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports Lights On After2 school, a national celebration of afterschool programs held 

3 on October 20, 2016. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS