alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10K
FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000277595
<NAME> ENERGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      276,533
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    168,383
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         115,295
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        10,760
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 570,971
<COMMON>                                           112
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       89,635
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             98,658
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 188,405
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           195,545
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              59,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,805
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 126,216
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  570,971
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      399,442
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             5,048
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     360,645
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     365,693
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         33,749
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,712
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  35,461
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        13,920
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,541
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   21,541
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        12,903
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        9,890
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          52,457
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.95
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-68656) and the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (Nos. 333-117941, 333-117536, 333-105284, 333-62030, 333-44764, and333-42385) of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. of our report dated July 29,2004, except as to the seventh paragraph of Note 17, which is as of August 13,2004, the tenth paragraph of Note 17, which is as of August 25, 2004, and the secondparagraph of Note 23, which is as of August 26, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K.
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Dallas, Texas
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE COUNTY COURT OF HENDERSON COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 8th

day of July, 2015 , the cause upon a ppeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF

THELMA PAULINE TAYLO R ERWIN, DECEASED

NO. 12

- 14

- 00244

- CV; Trial Court No. 28

- 2014

By per curiam opinion.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered,

it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the

appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution

.

It is t herefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be,

and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution ; and that this decision be certified to

the court below for observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of ou r said Court of Appeals

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of

Tyler, this the 18 th day of September , 2015.

PAM ESTES , CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10861 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FELIX SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:96-CR-008-1
- - - - - - - - - - December 11, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Felix Sandoval pleaded guilty to one count of possession of heroin with the intent to distribute it. He was sentenced to 76 months’ imprisonment. Sandoval argues that the district court erred in finding that he committed his offense within a "protected location" as defined by U.S.S.G. § 2D1.2 and 21 U.S.C. § 1860. We have reviewed the record and Sandoval's contentions and we find noNo. 96-10861 - 2 -

reversible error. United States v. Echevaria , 995 F.2d 562, 564 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                  EXHIBIT 27.1


                       PLAY CO. TOYS & ENTERTAINMENT CORP.
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE


This  schedule  contains  summary  information   extracted  from  the  condensed
consolidated  balance  sheet,  statements of operations and cash flows and notes
thereto  incorporated in Part 1, Item 1, of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                                         377,178
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  172,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    15,127,625
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               18,761,014
<PP&E>                                                         11,757,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 (4,511,565)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 29,419,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          21,556,555
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    7,145,618
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (2,026,898)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   29,419,769
<SALES>                                                        13,375,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               0
<CGS>                                                          7,364,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               7,995,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             1,312,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (143,497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (2,502,984)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (2,502,984)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (2,502,984)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.70)



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51492

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS RIVAS-ZUBIATE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-1581-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus RivasZubiate raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 14, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 613 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-257, K2025-255.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26373 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**EXHIBIT21**

**ALEXANDER’S, INC.**

**SUBSIDIARIES OFREGISTRANT**

 

731 Commercial Holding LLC

731 Commercial LLC

731 Office One Holding LLC

731 Office One LLC

731 Office Two Holding LLC

731 Office Two LLC

731 Residential Holding LLC

731 Residential LLC

731 Restaurant LLC

731 Retail One LLC

Alexander’s Department Stores of Brooklyn, Inc.

Alexander’s Department Stores of New Jersey, Inc.

Alexander’s Kings Plaza, LLC

Alexander’s of Kings, LLC

Alexander’s Management LLC

Alexander’s of Brooklyn II LLC

Alexander’s of Brooklyn, Inc.

Alexander’s of Flushing, Inc.

Alexander’s of Rego Park II, Inc.

Alexander’s of Rego Park III, Inc.

ALX of Paramus, LLC

Alexander’s Personnel Providers, Inc.

Alexander’s Rego Park Center, Inc.

Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc.

Alexander’s Restaurant LLC

Kings Parking, LLC

Kings Plaza Lender LLC

Ownreal Inc.

Rego Park Commercial LLC

Rego Park Residential LLC

Sakraf Wine & Liquor Store, Inc.

----
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 12

                                ALEXANDER'S, INC.

                CONSOLIDATED RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(amounts in thousands except ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       December 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
                                          2001           2000           1999           1998           1997
                                         --------      --------       --------       --------       --------
<S>                                    <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings                                 $ 23,901      $  5,197       $  5,524       $ (6,055)      $  7,466

Fixed charges (1)                          22,608        21,563         17,786         16,651         13,749
                                         --------      --------       --------       --------       --------
Income from continuing operation
  before income taxes and
  fixed charges                          $ 46,509      $ 26,760       $ 23,310       $ 10,596       $ 21,215
                                         ========      ========       ========       ========       ========

Fixed charges:
  Interest and debt expense              $ 22,469      $ 21,424       $ 17,647       $ 16,541       $ 13,639
  1/3 of rent expense - interest
   factor                                     139           139            139            110            110
                                         --------      --------       --------       --------       --------
                                           22,608        21,563         17,786         16,651         13,749
Capitalized interest                       19,259        16,731          9,352          7,864          9,079
                                         --------      --------       --------       --------       --------
                                         $ 41,867      $ 38,294       $ 27,138       $ 24,515       $ 22,828
                                         ========      ========       ========       ========       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges           1.11            --             --             --             --

Deficiency in earnings available to
  cover fixed charges                    $     --      $(11,534)      $ (3,828)      $(13,919)      $ (1,613)
                                         ========      ========       ========       ========       ========
</TABLE>

Notes:

(1)   For purposes of this calculation, earnings before fixed charges consist of
      earnings plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense on
      all indebtedness (including amortization of debt issuance costs) from
      continuing operations and the portion of operating lease rental expense
      that is representative of the interest factor (deemed to be one-third of
      operating lease rentals).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of
ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2007                      
|                                            
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                      
|Paritosh K. Choksi                          
|Executive Vice President of General Partner,
|Principal Financial Officer of Registrant   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Argued October 4,

affirmed November 5, 1973

#### DOCKHAM, *Respondent, v.*DOCKHAM (No. 27401), *Appellant,*

515 P2d 430

*Ronald I. Gevurts,*Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Pozzi, Wilson *&*Atchison.

Answer to appellant’s brief filed by respondent, Sandra Mariam Dockham Bine, Bellevue, Washington, pro se.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Fort, Judges. •

LANGTRY, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant-father’s motion to change custody of a sis-*257(now- seven) year-old son from Ms. former wife to himself

The boy arid " the two other" children of the parties were placed in the custody of the mother in a divorce decree in October 1970. Each-of the parties remarried in 1972.

The boy at' age of six had án I.Q. of 53 and the mental development of a child of three. He had been placed by his mother in a school and a home where retarded children were cared for and had been making good progress, considering his difficulties.

In Ms own home he had had trouble manifested by such tMngs as pushing his brother’s Mghchair (with the brother in it) into a creek, throwing a kitten into a fire, and spreading birdseed on the basement stairway, resulting in his grandfather’s sliding, falling and breaking Ms back.

The defendant proposed to take the boy into his home where Ms new wife and her young cMldren live. The new wife appears by education and experience to be capable of caring for the boy, but by reason of her job as a social worker it would not be she who would be caring for the boy much of the time. The parties and their new spouses displayed a marked dislike for erich other. The record indicates defendant has had three successive attorneys since starting this change of custody proceeding. Plaintiff has had two, and represented herself on the appeal.

We have reviewed the transcript consisting of 509 pages and conclude that the trial judge was correct when he said at the conclusion of the protracted hearings :

> “* * * [A]ll things being equal, the Court prefers to have children in the home of the natural *258parent * * *. I would normally * * * change custody, but I’m not satisfied * * * there bas been sufficient change of circumstances to justify it * # # 33

While we have read the record, we see no point in detailing in this opinion the difficulties of these sincere people. *See Sarty v. Forney,*12 Or App 251, 506 P2d 535 (1973).

Affirmed.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 596 

Designating September 2016 as ‘‘Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 

Mr. COONS (for himself, Mr. KIRK, and Mr. MURPHY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2016 as ‘‘Pulmonary Fibrosis 

Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas pulmonary fibrosis is a debilitating and ultimately 

fatal condition that causes progressive scarring in the 

lungs and generally has no known definitive cause; 

Whereas as many as 200,000 individuals in the United States 

are known to suffer from pulmonary fibrosis, the majority of whom are between the ages of 50 and 75; 

Whereas the average survival rate for the idiopathic form of 

pulmonary fibrosis is just 2.8 years and up to 80 percent 

of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients die within 5 

years of diagnosis; 

Whereas pulmonary fibrosis takes the lives of 40,000 individuals in the United States each year, approximately 1 

death every 13 minutes; 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 596 IS 

Whereas many patients with pulmonary fibrosis are 

misdiagnosed for 1 year or longer after the patients are 

presenting with pulmonary fibrosis symptoms; 

Whereas as of September 2016, there are no biomarkers for 

screening and testing for pulmonary fibrosis; 

Whereas a cure or drug that is effective for all pulmonary fibrosis patients that would extend life or universally improve symptoms does not exist; 

Whereas the symptoms of pulmonary fibrosis vary from person to person and include shortness of breath, a dry 

cough, fatigue, weight loss, and aching muscles and 

joints; 

Whereas volunteers, researchers, caregivers, and medical professionals are working to improve the quality of life for 

individuals with pulmonary fibrosis and the families of 

those individuals; and 

Whereas developing more effective treatments for pulmonary 

fibrosis and providing access to quality care to individuals 

with pulmonary fibrosis requires increased research, education, and community support services: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2016 as ‘‘Pulmonary 

3 Fibrosis Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Pulmonary 

5 Fibrosis Awareness Month; 

6 (3) continues to support more robust and accel7 erated research to develop more effective treatments 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 596 IS 

1 for pulmonary fibrosis and to ultimately find a cure 

2 for the disease; 

3 (4) recognizes the courage and contributions of 

4 individuals with pulmonary fibrosis who participate 

5 in vital clinical trials to advance the knowledge of 

6 the disease; and 

7 (5) commends the dedication of organizations, 

8 volunteers, researchers, and millions of individuals in 

9 the United States and abroad working to improve 

10 the quality of life for individuals with pulmonary fi11 brosis and the families of those individuals. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS