**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG) (Renewal)** 
**1. Identification of the Information Collection 1(a) Title of the Information Collection**  NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG) (Renewal), EPA I CR Number 1781.07 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0358 **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, subpart GGG) were : 1) proposed on April 2, 1997 ; 2) promulgated on September 21, 1998 ; and 3) amended on April 21, 2011

. The most recent amendment to the rule eliminate d the startup, shutdown, and malfunction ex emption, remove d the SSM plan requirement, add ed provisions to provide an affirmative defense against civil penalties for exceedances of emission standards caused by malfunctions, added a provision to require electronic submittal of performance test result s , and correct ed editorial error s
. The amendment did not otherwise impose any additional burden. These regulations apply to existing and new pharmaceuticals manufacturing operations that are major sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP). The affected facilities encompass all pharmaceuticals manufacturing operations that include process vents, storage tanks, equipment components, and wastewater sy stems. New facilities include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart GGG

. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. The y are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring s ys tem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, an d records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority

. In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the U

. S

. Envi ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of one affected facilities at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site). Over the next three ye ars, an average of 27 respondents per ye ar will be subject to the se2

standard s , and no additional respondents per year will become subject to the standard s
. The Office of Management and Budget ( OMB) approved the currentl y active I CR without any

“Terms of Clearance.” All of the pharmaceutical production facilities in the United States are owned and operated b y the pharmaceutical industry (the “Affected Public”). None of the facilities in the United States are owne d by either state, or local, or tribal entities or by the Federal government. They are all privatel y- owned , for

- profit businesses. The “burden ” to the “Affected Public” may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG) (Renewal) . The “burden ” to the Federal g overnment is attributed entirel y to work performed b y either F ederal employees or government contractors and may be found below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG) (Renewal)

. **2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintai n such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, duri ng such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certification s in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment, HAP emissions from pharmaceuticals production (predominatel y methanol, methylene chloride and tolu ene) cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP w ere promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 63, subpart GGG

.3

**2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data**  The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the se standard s ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which were promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as ev idence in legal proceedings. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard. Continuous e mission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times. During the performance test a record of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor. The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated , leaks are being dete cted and repaired , and the standard is being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations.
**3. Non**
**- duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria**  The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 63, subpart GGG

. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Fede ral standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, duplication does not exist. **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submis sion to OMB**  An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Register (78 FR 35023) on June 11, 2013. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations** The Agency ’s industry

experts have been consulted, and the Agency ’s internal data4

sources and projections of industry growth over the next three years have been considered. The primary source of information as reported b y industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S) which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. OTIS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all complianc e data. The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agency ’s internal industry experts. Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard s as they were being developed and the standard s have been reviewed previously to determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes. Indeveloping this ICR, we contacted : 1) the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) , at (202) 835

- 3400 ; and 2) Noramco Incorporated , at (302) 652

- 3840

. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice. In this case, no comments were received. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection** Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines**
These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including rep orts and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five

- ye ar records retention requirement is consistent with Part 70 permit program and the five

- ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. Th e retention of records for five ye ars allows EPA to establish the compliance history of a source, any pattern of non

- compliance and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has f

ound that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made5

will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions**
The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive question s. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes**  The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are pharmaceuticals manufacturing operations . The United States Standard Industrial Classification ( SI C ) code for the respondents affected by the standards and the corresponding North American Industry Classification System (NAI CS ) codes are listed below

. **Standard ( 40 CFR,**  **P art 63,**  **S ubpart GGG** **) SIC Codes**  **NAICS Codes** Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing 2835 , 2834 325412 Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing 2833 325411 **4(b) Information Requested (i) Data Items** 
In this ICR , all the data that is recorded or reported is required b y NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG) (Renewal)

. A source must make the following reports:

**Notification s**  Change in area source status (as applicable) 63.1(c)(5) Application and notification of construction/reconstruction 63.5(b)(4), 63.5(d), 63.1260(c) Notification of applicability 63.9(a), 63.1260(b) Notification of initial startup 63.9(b), 63.9(d), 63.1260(b) Notification of initial performance test, submittal of test plan, request of waiver of performance test 63.7(b)(1

- 2), 63.7(c), 63.7(f), 63.7(h), 63.9(e), 63.12 57(b)(8), 63.1260(1) Notification of delay

(reschedule) of initial performance test 63.7(b)(2)6
**Notification s**  Notification of CMS performance evaluation and results 63.8(e)(2), 63.9(e)(5), 63.9(g)(1), 63.10(e)(2), 63.1260(d) Notification of continue use of alternative to relative accuracy testing has been exceeded 63.9(g)(3), 63.1260(d) Notification of compliance status report (NOCSR) 63.9(h), 63.1260(f) Initial performance test results 63.10(d)(2), 63.7(g) 63.1260(f) Request for compliance extension and progress reports for compliance extension (as applicable) 63.10(d)(4), 63.1250(f)(6), 63.1260(m) Reports of malfunctions 63.1260(i) Pre

- compliance report (as applicable) 63.1260(e) Notification of process change 63.1260(h) Periodic reports 63.1260(g) Reports of leak detection and repair (LDAR) 63.1260(j), 63.1255(h) Reports of emissions averaging 63.1260(k) Reports of malfunctions that result in an exceedances of the standard for the purpose of affirmative defense 63.1250(g)(4)
A source must keep the following records:
**Recordkeeping** Recordkeeping requirements 63.10(a), 63.1259(a) All reports and notifications 63.10(b)(1), 63.1259(a)(1) Record of applicability 63.10(b)(3), 63.1259(a)(2) Records of sources with continuous monitoring systems (CMS) 63.10(c)(1

- 14), 63.1259(a)(4) Application for approval of construction/reconstruction 63.1259(a)(5) Records of equipment operation 63.1259(b) Records of operating scenarios 63.1259(c) Records of LDAR programs 63.1259(d), 63.1255(g) Records of emissions averaging 63.1259(e) Records of delay

of repair 63.1259(f) Records of wastewater stream or residual transfer 63.1259(g)7 **Recordkeeping** Records of extensions 63.1259(h) Records of inspections 63.1259(i) Records should be retained for 5 ye ars 63.10(b)(1), 63.1259(a)(1) Electronic Reporting Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies in cooperation with th e respondents continue to create reporting sy stems to transmit data electronically . However, electronic reporting s ys tems are still not widely used. At this time, it is estimated that approximately 20 percent of the respon dents use electronic reporting. The amendments to the NESHAP require that any performance tests performed after December 31, 2011 be submitted electronicall y to EPA’s Central Data Exchange b y using the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) for test methods that are compatible with ERT. This new requirement to submit the data to the ERT is in addition to the other existing submission requirements for this data.

**(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities** Read instructions. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate monitoring devices

. Perform initial performance test, Reference Method 1, 2, 3, 4, 18, 25, and 26 test, and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information.8 **Respondent Activities** Develop, acquire, install, and utilize tec hnology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. Currently sources are using monitoring and reporting equipment that provide parameter data in an automated way ( e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem) . Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this ty pe of monitoring equipm ent has significantl y reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. EPA is including in Table 3 (located at the end of this supporting statement) an estimate of the burden associated with performing an affirmative defense. The EPA is providing this as an illustrative example of the potential additional administrative burden a source may incur to assert an “ Affirmative Defense ” in response to an action to enforce the standards set forth in the applicable subpart. This illustrative es timate is not considered a duplicate estimate of cost under the General Duty to Minimize Emissions clause under 63.6(e)(1)(i), which states: “At all times, the owner and operator must operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. Determining whether such operation and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on informati on available to the Administrator which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, review of operation and maintenance procedures, review of operation and maintenance records, and inspection of the source.” To provide the public with an estimate of the relative magnitude of the burden associated with an assertion of the affirmative defense position adopted by a source, EPA estimates the costs of the notification, recordkeeping and reporting requirements associated with the assertion of the a ffirmative defense in this I CR . EPA’s estimate for the required notification, reports and records, including the root cause analy sis, associated with a single incident totals approximately $3, 298 and is based on the time and effort required of a source to review relevant data, interview plant employees, and document the events surrounding a malfunction that has caused an exceedance of an emission limit. The estimate also includes time to produce and retain the records and reports for submission to EPA. The EPA provides this illustrative estimate of this burden because these costs are onl y incurred if there has been a violation and a source chooses to take advantage of the affirmative defense. Of the number of excess emission events reported by source operators, onl y a small number would be expected to result from a malfunction, and only a subset of excess emissions caused b y malfunctions would result in the source choosing to assert the affirmative defense.9

Thus we believe the number of instances in which source operators might be expected to avail themselves of the affirmative defense will be extremely small. For this reason, we estimate no more than 2 or 3 such occurrences for all sources wi thin a given category over the 3

- ye ar period covered b y this ICR. For the purpose of this estimate, we are adding two (2) instances of affirmative defense. We expect to gather information on such events in the future and will revise this estimate as bett er information becomes available. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities** EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analy sis, storage, and distribution of the required information.
**Agency Activities** Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information Sy stem (OTI S). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are p roperl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source ’ s initial capability to comp ly with the emission standard, and note the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determi nations.
In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

EPA's Office of Compliance. OT IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industri al and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses the OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five ye ars.10

**5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** A majority

of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the ty pes of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum require ments needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown in below Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG) (Renewal)

. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection**  Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Wherever appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 44,2 66 hours ( Total Labor Hours from Table 1 below). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and exp erience with the NESHAP program, the previously

approved ICR, and any

comments received. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $ 123.04 ($5 8

. 59 + 110%) Technical $ 10 1

. 2 2 ($4 8

. 2 0 + 110%) Clerical $ 51

. 18 ($2 4

. 37 + 110%)11

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2013 , “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs** The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are on

- time costs when a facility becomes subject t o the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor(s) and other costs such as photocop ying and postage.

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**
**Capital/Startup vs. Operati on and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**  (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F)

Data

- logger and Thermocouple $4,400 0 $0 $4,158 27 $112,266
**Total $0**  **$112,266** The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $ 0 . This is the total o f column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this I CR are $ 112,266

. This is the total of column G.

The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $ 112,266

. **(iv) Affirmative Defense, Root Cause Analysis, and Malfunction Costs.** EPA’s estimate for an affirmative defense and root cause anal ys is is based on general experience to calculate the time and effort required of a source to review relevant data, inter view plant employees, and reconstruct the events prior to a malfunction in order to determine primary and contributing causes. The level of effort also includes time to produce and retain the report in document form so that the source will have it availab le should EPA or state enforcement agencies ever request to review it.12

**6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program i ncludes activities such as the examination of records maint ained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 71, 518

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $ 6 2.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 8. 92 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28. 88 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 63 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 20 1 3 General Schedule , which excludes locality , rates of pay

. The rates have been increased b y 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees
. Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG) (Renewal)

. **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the n ext three years, approximately 27 existing respondents will be subject to the se standard s . It is estimated that no additional respondents per ye ar will become subject. The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below, is 27 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR.
**Number of Respondents**

Year (A)

Number of New Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 0 27 0 0 27
2 0 27 0 0 27
3 0 27 0 0 27 **Average 0**  **27 0**  **0 27** 13

1 New respondent include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities. C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 27

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table below : **Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D
Notification of construction/reconstruction 0 1 0 0 Notification of physical or operational changes 27 3 0 81 Notification of actual startup 0 1 0 0 Notification of initial performance test 0 1 0 0 Notification of applicability 0 1 0 0 Notification of demonstration of CMS 0 1 0 0 Notification of compliance status 0 1 0 0 Pre

- compliance report (emission averaging) 0 1 0 0 Malfunction 27 2 0 54 No deviations 24 2 0 48 Deviations 3 2 0 6 LDAR report 27 2 0 54 Emissions averaging report 3 2 0 6 Reports of malfunctions that result in an exceedances of the standard for the purpose of affirmative defense 27 0.025 0 0.7 **Total Number of Annual Responses Total**  **2 49.7**  The number of Total Annual Responses is 250 (rounded)

. The total annual labor costs are $4,3 30 , 252

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG) (Renewal)

. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents a nd the14

Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectivel y, and summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 44,2 66 hours at a cost of $4,330,252

. Details regarding these estimates may

be found below in Table 1: Annual Responde nt Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG) (Renewal)

. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 177 hours per response

. The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $112,266

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs. **(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 1,5 8 7 labor hours at a cost of $71, 518 . See below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG) (Renewal )

. **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** There is no change in the labor hours in this I CR compared to the previous ICR. This is due to two considerations : 1) the regulations have not changed since the publication of the 2011 final rule, which was covered in the last ICR renewal ; and 2) the growth rate for the industry is very low, negative or non

- existent, so there is no significant change in the overall burden. However, there is an increase in industry cost as the burden calculations in this I CR, includi ng affirmative defense, have been updated to use more recent labor rates. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 177 hours per response. “ Burden ” means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency . This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control15

Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.
T o comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2013

- 0349. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access t he index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically . When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are als o available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the docket center is (202) 566

- 17 5 2 . Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation an d Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2013

- 0349 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0358 in any correspondence.
**Part B of the Supporting Statement**  This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.16

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost** 

**– NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG)**  **(Renewal)**

**Burden item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per year**  **(A x B) (** **D)**

**Respondents per year (a)**  **(E)**

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(CxD) (F)** 

**Management person hours**  **per year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person hours**  **per year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Total Cost per year (b)** 
1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read rule and instructions 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 B. Required Activities i. Initial performance tests New 480 1 480 0 0 0 0 $0 Reconstructed 160 1 160 0 0 0 0 $0 Wastewater 160 1 160 0 0 0 0 $0 ii. Quality control plan for CMS 60 1 60 0 0 0 0 $0 iii. Develop record system 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 iv. Train personnel 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 v. Repeat performance test d 60 1 60 0 0 0 0 $0 C. Write reports i. Notification of construction/reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 ii. Notification of physical or operational changes c, e 8 3 24 27 648 32.4 64.8 $72,893.52 iii. Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 iv. Notification of initial performance test 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 v. Notification of applicability 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 vi. Notificati o n of demonstration of CMS 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 vii. Notification of compliance status 120 1 120 0 0 0 0 $0 viii. Per

- compliance report (emission averaging) 180 1 180 0 0 0 0 $0 ix. Startup, shutdown, malfunction f 40 2 80 27 2,160 108 216 $242,978.40 x. Semiannual summary report a. No deviations g 8 2 16 24 384 19.2 38.4 $43,196.16 b. Deviations h 24 2 48 3 144 7.2 14.4 $16,198.56 xi. Leak det ection and repair (LDAR) report i 432 2 864 27 23,328 1,166.4 2,332.8 $2,624,166.7217

**Burden item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per year**  **(A x B) (** **D)**

**Respondents per year (a)**  **(E)**

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(CxD) (F)** 

**Management person hours**  **per year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person hours**  **per year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Total Cost per year (b)** 
xii. Emissions averaging report j 20 2 40 3 120 6 12 $13,498.80 xiii. Affirmative defense n 30 0.67 20 1 12 8 0 $2,198.96 **Subtotal for Reporting Requirements 30,821.6**  **$3,015,131.12** 4. Recordkeeping requirements i. Records for operating parameters for control devices k 1 365 365 27 9,855 492.75 985.5 $1,108,588.95 ii. Records of SS&M l 2 26 52 27 1,404 70.2 140.4 $157,935.96 iii. Calibration of CMS m 16 1 16 27 432 21.6 43.2 $48,595.68 iv. LDAR See 3C **Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements 13,444.**  **7 $1,315,120.59**  **Total Labor Burden and Cost (rounded)**  **44,2 66**  **$4,3 30**  **, 25**  **2**

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to this rule will be 27. There will be no new ad ditional sources during the next three years of this ICR. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $123.04 per hour for Exec utive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $101.22 per hour for Technical labor, and $51.18 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2013, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by Oc cupational and Industry group. The rates are from column 1, Total Compensation. The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
c We have assumed that there will be no ne w or reconstructed facilities during the next three years of this ICR, however the ICR estimates that all existing sources will have changes in their operations d We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents would have to repeat performance tests due to failure. e We have assumed that each source will require an average of three processing changes each year to complete this task over the next three years of this ICR. f We have assumed that each respondent will take 40 hours two times per year to complete the startup, shutdown, malfunction rep orts. g We have assumed that 90 percent of respondents will each take eight hour two times per year to complete the n o deviation report. h We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will each take 24 hours two times per year to complete the deviation report. i We have assumed that it will take each respondent 432 hour two times per year to complete the LDAR report. j We have assumed that ten percent of respondents will each take 20 hours two times per year to complete the emissions averagin g report. k We have assumed that it will take each respondent 1 hour 365 times per year to record the operating parameters for control de vices.18

l We have assumed that it will take each respondent 2 hours 26 times per year to record the SSM plans.
m We have assum ed that it will take each respondent 16 hours one time per year to record the calibration of CMS.
n Assumes 2 affirmative defense reports for entire industry during the 3

- yr ICR period. Formulas are not followed for person

- hours per year. For affirmati ve d efense hours required assumes 1 8 hours technical, 12 hours management, 0 clerical for each instance of affirmative defense.19

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG)**  **(Renewal)**

**Activity (A)**  **EPA person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per plant per year**  **(C)**

**EPA person hours per**  **plant per year**  **(A x B) (D)** 

**Plants per year**  **(a) (E)**  **Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(CxD) (F)** 

**Management person hours**  **per year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Cost, $ (b)**

1. Required activities i. Initial performance tests (c) 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 ii. Repeat performance test (d) 24 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 2. Report review

- one time i. Notification of construction/reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 ii. Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 iii. Notification of demonstration of CMS 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 iv. Initial notification 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 v. Notification of compliance status report 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 vi. Pre

- compliance report (e) a. With emissions averaging (f) 20 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 b. Without emissions averaging 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 3. Report review

- on - going i. Semiannual summary report a. No deviations (g) 2 2 4 24 96 4.8 9.6 $4,975.15 b. Deviations (h) 8 2 16 3 48 2.4 4.8 $2,487.58 ii. Notification of physical or operational changes (i) 8 3 24 27 648 32.4 64.8 $33,582.28 iii. Startup, shutdown malfunction (j) 2 2 4 27 108 5.4 10.8 $5,597.05 iv. Leak detection and repair (LDAR) report (k) 8 2 16 27 432 21.6 43.2 $22,388.18 v. Emissions averaging report (l) 8 2 16 3 48 2.4 4.8 $2,487.58 **Total Annual Burden and Cost (rounded)**  **1, 587**  **$71, 51**  **8**

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to this rule will be 27. There will be no new ad ditional sources during the next three years of this ICR. b This cost is based on the following labor rates w hich incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: $62.27 Managerial rate (GS

- 13, Step 5, $38.92 x 1.6), $46.21 Technical rate (GS

- 12, Step 1, $28.88 x 1.6), and $25.01 Clerical rate (GS

- 6, Step 3, $15.63 x 1.6). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2013 General Schedule which excludes locality rates of pay.20

c We have assumed that there will be no new or reconstructed facilities during the next three years of this ICR. d We have assumed that 20 pe rcent of respondents would have to repeat performance tests due to failure.
e We have assumed that 50 percent of new facilities will submit a pre

- com pliance report. f We have assumed that 10 percent of existing facilities will have to comply with emission averaging requirements; new faciliti es are not allowed to use emissions averaging. g We have assumed that 90 percent of respondents will each take two hours two ti me s per year to complete this report. h We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will have to report deviation. i We have assumed that each respondent will be required to review the physical/operational changes for each facility three time s per year over the next three

- year period of this ICR. j We have assumed that each respondent will report actions taken during startup, shutdown, or malfunction that are consistent. k We have assumed that each respondent will have to comply with the LDAR report two times per year. l We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will have to review the emission averaging report.

**Table 3: Single Affirmative Defense Burden Estimate** 

**Personnel Number of** 

**Personnel Time** 

**Requirement (hours)**  **Total**

**Hours Hourly Rate** 

**($/hr) Total**  Technical Personnel 3 6 18 101.22 $ 1, 822 Managerial Personnel 2 6 12 1 23.04 $ 1, 476 **Total 5**  **30 $3,**  **298**