alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 9, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00284

- CV

Ronald Dean STRICKLAND

, Appellant

v.

IHEARTMEDIA , Inc. and Stephen L. Schaefer, Appellees

From the 198th Judicial District Court

, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVDO

- 21

- 0000063

Honorable M. Rex Emerson , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s “Order Sustaining Defendants’ iHeartMedia, Inc. and Stephen L. Schaefer’s Contest of Plaintiff’s Swo rn Statement of Inability to Pay Costs of Appeal or Post Appeal Bond and Denying Plaintiff’s Sworn Statement of Inability to Pay Costs of Appeal or Post Appeal Bond,” signed on September 17, 2021, is

REVERSED.

We ORDER that appellant Ronald Dean Strickla nd may proceed with this appeal without payment of filing fees or costs for the record.

We ORDER the court reporter to file within 30 days of the date of this order the reporter’s record from the hearing held on July 13, 2021.

We ORDER that appellant’s brief is due 30 days after the reporter’s record is filed.

It is so ORDERED on March 9, 2022.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice04

- 21

- 00284

- CV

- 2

- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the s aid court on this 9th day of March, 2022.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court
The following are signs of a medical emergency!

Abnormal thinking or behavior

Slurred speech 

Seizures

Loss of consciousness

Prevent Heat

Illness at Work

Outdoor and indoor heat exposure

can be dangerous.

First Aid for Heat Illness

New and returning workers need to build 

tolerance to heat (acclimatize) and take 

frequent breaks.

Follow the 20% Rule. On the first day, work 

no more than 20% of the shift’s duration at 

full intensity in the heat. Increase the 

duration of time at full intensity by no more 

than 20% a day until workers are used to

working in the heat.

Ways to Protect Yourself and Others

1 CALL 911 IMMEDIATELY

2 COOL THE WORKER RIGHT AWAY WITH WATER OR ICE

3 STAY WITH THE WORKER UNTIL HELP ARRIVES 

?

? ? ?? ?

Ease into Work. Nearly 3 out of 4 fatalities from heat 

illness happen during the first week of work.

Drink Cool Water 

Drink cool water even if you aren’t thirsty — at least 1 cup 

every 20 minutes.

Watch Out for Each Other

Monitor yourself and others for signs of heat illness.

Find Shade or a Cool Area

Take breaks in a designated shady or cool location.

Take Rest Breaks

Take enough time to recover from heat given the 

temperature, humidity, and conditions.

Dress for the Heat

Wear a hat and light-colored, loose-fitting, and breathable 

clothing if possible.

If Wearing a Face Covering 

Change your face covering if it gets wet or soiled. Verbally 

check on others frequently.

Watch for any other signs of heat illness 

and act quickly. When in doubt, call 911.

For more information: 

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov/heat

Federal law entitles you to a safe workplace. You 

have the right to speak up about hazards without 

fear of retaliation. See www.osha.gov/workers for 

information about how to file a confidential 

complaint with OSHA and ask for an inspection.

Take these actions:

Give cool water to drink

Remove unnecessary clothing 

Move to a cooler area

Cool with water, ice, or a fan 

Do not leave alone

Seek medical care

If a worker experiences:

Headache or nausea

Weakness or dizziness

Heavy sweating or hot, dry skin

Elevated body temperature

Thirst

Decreased urine output 

9-1-1

100%

20%

OSHA 4200-02 2023 | Ukrainian
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DAVID A. GRIMALDI,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellant,

v.

NEW CASTLE COUNTY,

Defendant Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 423, 2018

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. 15C-12-096

§

§

§

§

Submitted: December 10, 2018

Decided: December 11, 2018

O R D E R

This 11th day of December, 2018, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, David Grimaldi, filed this appeal from (i) the Superior 

Court’s order of August 18, 2016, dismissing five of the six causes of action that 

Grimaldi asserted against the appellee, New Castle County and (ii) the Superior 

Court’s order of July 13, 2018, granting New Castle County’s motion for summary 

judgment on the remaining cause of action. Grimaldi’s opening brief was due to be 

filed by October 1, 2018. When Grimaldi did not file the brief, the Chief Deputy 

Clerk issued a brief delinquency notice, dated October 8, 2018, advising Grimaldi 

that the brief must be filed within seven days. Grimaldi did not respond to the brief 

delinquency notice and did not file the opening brief.
2

(2) On October 18, 2018, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, by 

certified mail, directing Grimaldi to show cause why the appeal should not be 

dismissed for failure to file the opening brief. The notice to show cause directed 

Grimaldi to respond within ten days and advised him that if he did not respond, 

dismissal of the appeal would be deemed to be unopposed.

(3) The October 18th notice to show cause was sent to the address that 

Grimaldi provided in his notice of appeal. On November 26, 2018, the postal service 

returned the notice to show cause to the Clerk’s office with the notation, “Return to 

Sender, Attempted-Not Known, Unable to Forward.” On November 29, 2018, the 

notice to show cause was resent by first class mail.

(4) The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause 

within the required ten-day period, to file the opening brief, or to report any change 

of address to the Court, dismissal of this action is deemed unopposed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 29(b) 

and 3(b)(2), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2160/2004

of 16 December 2004         

amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1210/2004 for the 2004/2005 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 of 23 June 1995 laying down detailed implementing rules for the import of products in the sugar sector other than molasses (2), and in particular the second sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 1(2), and Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1423/95, as fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1210/2004 for the 2004/2005 marketing year are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 624/98 (OJ L 85, 20.3.1998, p. 5).

(3)OJ L 232, 1.7.2004, p. 11.

(4)OJ L 329, 4.11.2004, p. 9.

----

ANNEX

Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99  applicable from 17 December 2004

----

(1)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(2)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.I to Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(3)  Fixed per 1 % sucrose content.

----
Worker Safety Pledge Instructions 

This pledge is for use by companies have registered for Safe + Sound Week. If you haven’t 

registered, take the pledge at osha.gov/safeandsoundweek. 

You can use this pledge at a signing event or share photos of your completed pledges on 

social media. Use #SafeAndSoundatWork to tag your photos. 
I pledge to be Safe + Sound at Work. 

Signature Date
EXHIBIT 10(c)24

           SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

                              GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

            Only non-employee directors are compensated for service on the Board
of Directors (the "Board") of Georgia Power Company (the "Company"). The pay
components are as follows:

         o   Annual Cash Retainer Fee:            $22,000 per year

         o   Committee Chair Annual Retainer:     $3,000 per year

         o   Annual Stock Retainer Fee:           520 shares of common stock of
                                                  The Southern Company

         o   Board Meeting Fees:                  $1,800

         o   Committee Meeting Fees:              $1,200

         o   Site Visit, Extra Session or         $1,200
             Conference Fee

         At the election of the director, all or a portion of the cash retainer
may be payable in common stock of The Southern Company, and all or a portion of
total cash compensation may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan and
all of the stock retainer may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan
until membership on the Board is terminated. There is no pension plan for
non-employee directors.
**                                    Exhibit      32.1**

**                    CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
June 18, 2015 

Ms. Enda Cusack 

33 Four Brooks Circle 

Stamford, CT 06903

Dear Ms. Cusack: 

This is in response to your February 18, 2015, letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2015-0400) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Edna Cusack for an 

exemption from §§ 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Edna Cusack to conduct aerial 

photography and videography using an unmanned aerial system. 

By email dated March 24, 2015, which posted to the docket March 31, 2015, the FAA sent 

you a request for additional information asking you to provide: the specific section or 

sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of the relief you seek; the 

reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; and any additional 

information, views, or arguments available to support your request. The FAA has not 

received additional information to support why granting the request would be in the public 

interest. 

 

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your 

exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit 

your petition for exemption to the public docket. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Acting Director 

Office of Rulemaking
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      379
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,089
<PP&E>                                         263,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                 119,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,832
<BONDS>                                        190,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,602
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,522
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (153)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (153)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.53)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SCANTEK
MEDICAL INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE THREE MONTHS THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         547,491
<SECURITIES>                                 4,966,527
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,514,018
<PP&E>                                         351,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,156,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,414,576
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,712
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,148,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,156,643
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,185
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  377,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (418,890)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (418,890)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Community
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Richard H. Flake, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

                                         /s/ Richard H. Flake
                                         --------------------
                                         Richard H. Flake
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer


Date:   August 8, 2006
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A1 36 2 . HAROLD MI LLER v . KASAY COMBS.

Th i s cas e ori g i n a t ed as a su i t o n acco u n t i n m ag i st rat e co u rt

. Aft er t h e

m ag i s t rat e co u rt fo u nd i n fav o r o f Kas ay Co m b s , Haro l d M i ll er ap p eal ed t o t h e

s u p eri o r co u rt

. Th e s u p eri o r co u rt al s o fo u n d in fav o r o f C o m bs an d affi rm ed t h e

m ag i s t rat e’ s ju d gm en t o f $1 5 ,0 0 0

. M i l l er th en fi l ed th i s d i rect ap p eal

. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Becau s e t h e o rd er at i s s u e co ncern s a d e n o vo ap p eal fro m a m ag i s t rat e co u rt
d eci s i o n , M i l l er w as req ui red t o fo l l o w t he d i s cre t i o n ary ap p eal p ro ced u res

. See
OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ); En g l is h v. Del b r i d ge , 2 1 6 Ga. Ap p

. 3 6 6
, 3 6 7 (4 5 4 SE2 d 1 7 5 ) (1 9 9 5). Acco rd i n gl y , t h i s ap peal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. June 01, 2022

06/01/2022
AFS-11-170-E April 12, 2011

Exemption No. 10241 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-11883

Col. Deborah A. Richardson U.S. Department of the Army Aeronautical Services Agency Fort Belvoir, VA 22060

Dear Col. Richardson:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8430, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.



### The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 9, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of U.S. Department of the Army (U.S. Army) for an extension of and amendment to Exemption No. 8430, as amended. That exemption from § 91.169(a)(2) and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the U.S. Army to file instrument flight rules flight plans in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the U.S. Army. That exemption, however, expired on October 31, 2010; therefore, we will treat your request as a new petition.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to U.S. Army.

The FAA has issued you a previous grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 6528 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that based on the U.S. Army’s record of safely conducted operations under the authority of Exemption Nos. 64A and 5368, and its record of ensuring sufficient fuel for flight to an alternate airport, when required, the U. S. Army’s regulations would provide an equivalent level of safe ty as that provided by § 91.169(a)(2) and (c).2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 6528;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 6528 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant U. S. Department of the Army an exemption from 14 CFR § 91.169(a)(2) and (c) to the extent necessary to allow the U. S. Army to file instrument flight rules flight plans in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the U.S. Army.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 180 (Saturday, November 29, 2008)]
[House]
[Page S10783]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 154

WASHINGTON, SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2008

No. 180
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         Alabama National BanCorporation

                  Computation of Earnings Per Share (Unaudited)
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Per Share
                                                   Income      Shares        Amount
                                                   ------      ------      ---------
<S>                                                <C>         <C>         <C>
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002
Basic EPS net income ........................      $8,608      12,350         $0.70
                                                                              =====
Effect of dilutive securities ...............        --           284
                                                   ------      ------
Diluted EPS .................................      $8,608      12,634         $0.68
                                                   ======      ======         =====

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2001
Basic EPS net income ........................      $5,843      11,788         $0.50
                                                                              =====
Effect of dilutive securities ...............        --           239
                                                   ------      ------
Diluted EPS .................................      $5,843      12,027         $0.49
                                                   ======      ======         =====
</TABLE>