T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B E N IG N O G U T IE R R E Z -B A R R IO S ; et a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 72859 A ge nc yN os . A 072- 109- 839

A 077- 432- 006 A 076- 672- 461 A 076- 859- 994 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t2, 2011 ** B e f o r e : R Y M E R , I K U T A , a n dN .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . B e n ig n o G u tie rr e z - B a rr io s , F lo r id aA lm aE s p in o z ad e G u tie rr e z , a n dth e ir c hi l dr e n, na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of Im m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ o rd erd ism issin g th eir ap p ea l fro m an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s deci si on denyi ng thei r app l i ca t i on s f or as ylum , w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and rel i ef



# FI LED AU G 5 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 72859 2 un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture ( “ C A T ”) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e , Li m v . I NS , 224 F . 3d 929, 933 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 0 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e s u p p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t p e titio n e r s d id note s t abl i s h pa s tpe r s e c ut i on oraw e l l - f ounde d f e arof f utur e pe r s e c ut i on ba s e d on G u tie rr e z - B a rr io s ’ p a rtic ip a tio n in ac iv il d e f e n s e p a tr o l b e c au s e th e yf a ile dto show a nexus betw ee n the threa t s thathe and h i s f am i l y r ec ei ved and a prot ec t ed g r o u n d . Se e Sa n g h a v . I NS , 103 F . 3d 1482, 1487 ( 9th C i r . 1997) ( pe r s e c ut i on by a nt i - gove rnm e ntgue r i l l a s m a ynot , “ f r om tha tf

a c ta l one , be pr e s um e d t o be ‘ on a c c o u n t o f’ p o litic a l o p in io n ” ) ; A rr i aga- B arr i e ntos v . I NS , 9 3 7 F .2 d4 1 1 , 4 1 4 ( 9 th C i r. 19 91 ) ( m andat ory s ervi ce i n the G uat em al an m i l i t ary di d n otdem on stra t e a ne xus t o apr ot e c t e d gr ound) . I n the abs e nc e of ane xus t o apr ot e c t e d gr ound, p e titio n e r s ’ a s y lu m a n dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. See Sori an o v. H

older , 5 6 9 F .3 d1 1 6 2 , 1 1 6 6 - 6 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . S u b st an t i al ev i d en ce al so su p p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se pet i t i on er s f

ai l ed t o sho w thati ti s m ore l i kel y than n otthatthey w ou l d b e t ortured if r e m o v e dto G u a te m a la . Se e id. a t1167. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.08- 72859 3