alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2008303EN.01S00301.xml

| 14.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 303/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 303/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 717/2005

of 11 May 2005         

amending for the 45th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freezing of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan (1), and in particular Article 7(1), first indent, thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 May 2005.

For the Commission

Eneko LANDÁBURU            

Director-General for External Relations

----

(1)OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 301/2005 (OJ L 51, 24.2.2005, p. 15).

----

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

The following entry shall be added under the heading ‘Legal persons, groups and entities’:

            ‘Lashkar e-Tayyiba (alias (a) Lashkar-e-Toiba, (b) Lashkar-i-Taiba, (c) al Mansoorian, (d) al Mansooreen, (e) Army of the Pure, (f) Army of the Righteous, (g) Army of the Pure and Righteous, (h) Paasban-e-Kashmir (i) Paasban-i-Ahle-Hadith, (j) Pasban-e-Kashmir, (k) Pasban-e-Ahle-Hadith, (l) Paasban-e-Ahle-Hadis).’         

----
ex10-11_276318.htm




EXHIBIT 10.11


 


________, 2010







Ziegler Asset Partners


Level 11, 459 Collins Street


Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia







RE:           AUSTRALIA ACQUISITION CORP.


Gentlemen:







This letter will confirm our agreement, effective on the date (the “Effective Date”) of the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of Australia Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier to occur of: (i) the consummation of a Business Transaction (as described in the Registration Statement), (ii) 21 months from the Effective Date, and (iii) the date on which the Company ceases its corporate existence in accordance with its Memorandum and Articles of Association, as amended, Ziegler Asset Partners shall make available to the Company office space and related administrative and support services, including but not limited to receptionist, secretarial and general office services.  In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Ziegler Asset Partners the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter.


 


Ziegler Asset Partners hereby irrevocably waives any and all right, title, interest, causes of action and claims of any kind (each, a “Claim”) in or to, and any and all right to seek payment of any amounts due to it out of, the trust account established for the benefit of the public shareholders of the Company and into which substantially all of the proceeds of the Company’s IPO will be deposited (the “Trust Account”), and hereby irrevocably waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, this agreement, which Claim would reduce, encumber or otherwise adversely affect the Trust Account or any monies or other assets in the Trust Account, and further agrees not to seek recourse, reimbursement, payment or satisfaction of any Claim against the Trust Account or any monies or other assets in the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflicts of laws principles.


 



	  	
Very truly yours,


 


AUSTRALIA ACQUISITION CORP.


 


By:  ________________________


Name:  Peter Ziegler


Title:   Chairman and Chief Executive


Officer


	
Accepted and agreed:


Ziegler Asset Partners


 


By:  ________________________


Name:  Peter Ziegler
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROSA H. ENRIQUEZ,

Appellant,

V.

GLORIA CALDERON AND SARA 

LOPEZ,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00095-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2016DCV1154)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant, Rosa H. Enriquez, has failed to file her

brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution.

The Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that her brief was past due and no motion for 

extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellant that the Court intended to dismiss 

the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and showed grounds 

for continuing the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant has not filed the brief or an 
- 2 -

extension motion, and she has not filed any response to the Court’s inquiry. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

October 31, 2018

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 23

- 00905

- CV
London THOMAS , Appellant

v.
THE PLACE AT OAK HILLS , Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3 , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023CV04877 Honorable David J. Rodriguez , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 14, 2024
DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION In this appeal from a forcible detainer judgment, the justice court found that London
Thomas had forcibly detained the plainti ff’s property. Thomas appealed to the county court; it also found she had forcibly detained the property. Thomas filed a notice of appeal in this court,
and her brief was due on J anuary 2 , 202 4

. After no brief or motion for extension of time to file th e brief was received, on January 5, 2024, we ordered Thomas to show cause in writing not later than January 16, 2024, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a). In our order, we04

- 23

- 00905

- CV

- 2

- warned Thomas that if she failed to show cause in writing as ordered, this appeal would be
dismissed without further notice. To date, Thomas has not filed a response to our J anuary 5 , 202 4 order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38 .8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Worlds Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |  |                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial condition and result of operations.



|                     | WORLDS INC.
        (Registrant)             
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|                     |                                              
|Date: March 31, 2014 | By:                                          
|                     | Thomas Kidrin
        Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2453

CORA EVANS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-94-

1662-L)

Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: August 2, 1996

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cora Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia McEvoy Smith, Assistant

Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order* affirming

the Secretary's final decision denying her claim for divorced

spouse survivor's benefits. We have reviewed the record and the

magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Evans v.

Secretary, HHS, No. CA-94-1662-L (D. Md. June 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 452

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 8, 1999

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 452 RFH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

2 (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for

3 purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8

4 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Belinda McGregor shall be held and

5 considered to have been selected for a diversity immigrant

6 visa for fiscal year 2000 as of the date of the enactment

7 of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

8 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Belinda McGregor,

9 or any child (as defined in section 101(b)(1) of the Immi10 gration and Nationality Act) of Belinda McGregor, enters

11 the United States before the date of the enactment of this

12 Act, he or she shall be considered to have entered and

13 remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligi14 ble for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Im15 migration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enact16 ment of this Act.

17 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

18 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Belinda

19 McGregor as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State

20 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one number

21 during the current fiscal year the total number of immi22 grant visas available to natives of the country of the alien’s
3

•S 452 RFH

1 birth under section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nation2 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(c)).

Passed the Senate August 5, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
Exhibit 32(b)


                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alabama Power
Company for the year ended December 31, 2003, we, the undersigned, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge and belief,
that:

     (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alabama Power Company for the year
          ended December 31, 2003, which this statement accompanies, fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of
          Alabama Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2003, fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of Alabama Power Company.



                                              /s/Charles D. McCrary
                                                Charles D. McCrary
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer



                                              /s/William B. Hutchins, III
                                                William B. Hutchins, III
                                                Executive Vice President,
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  March 1, 2004
# L_2009015EN.01S00301.xml

| 20.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 15/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 15/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
# C_2016335EN.01000801.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris — France) — Genentech Inc. v Hoechst GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH

(Case C-567/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Competition - Article 101 TFEU - Non-exclusive licence agreement - Patent - No infringement - Obligation to pay royalties))

(2016/C 335/09)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Genentech Inc.

Applicant:

Defendants: Hoechst GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 101(1) TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding the imposition on the licensee, under a licence agreement such as that at issue in the main proceedings, of a requirement to pay a royalty for the use of a patented technology for the entire period in which that agreement was in effect, in the event of the revocation or non-infringement of a licensed patent, provided that the licensee was able freely to terminate that agreement by giving reasonable notice.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.

1

---
#### Dodd v. Focht.

1. Seduction: action by parent: pleading: minority of child. An action by a parent for the seduction of a child can be maintained only when the child is a minor; (Code, § 2556;) and a petition in such case which does not allege the minority of the child is bad on demurrer. (Compare *Humble v. Shoemaker,*70 Iowa, 223.)

*Appeal from Montgomery District Gowrt*— HoN. Geo. OaesoN, *Judge.*

Thursday, October 13.

This is an action for damages for the alleged seduction of the plaintiff’s daughter. There was a demurrer to the petition, which was sustained, and the plaintiff appeals.

*Z. T.*Fisher, for appellant.

*G. E. Richards*and *F. P. Greenlee,*for appellee.

Rothrock, J.

It was alleged in the original petition that the defendant assaulted, debauched and carnally knew' one Elva Dodd, the daughter and servant of the plaintiff’.' A motion was made demanding that the plaintiff make his petition more specific. The motion was sustained, and thereupon *580tbe plaintiff filed an amendment to his petition, in which he alleged that “ the said Elva Dodd has arrived at the age of majority.”

The demurrer was to the effect that the petition does not state a cause of action, because a parent or guardian can only maintain an action of this character where a *minor*child is the injured party. The proper party plaintiff in an action of this kind is regulated by statute in this state. Section 2555 of the Code is as follows: “ An unmarried female may prosecute as plaintiff an action for her own seduction, and recover such damages as may be found in her favor.” And section 2556 provides as follows: “A father, or, in case of his death or imprisonment, or desertion of his family, the mother, may prosecute as plaintiff an action for the expenses and actual loss of service resulting from the injury or death of a minor child.” The policy of our laws is to require the real party in interest to prosecute actions, and, whatever may-have been the rule heretofore, it is apparent that under the sections of the Code above quoted no action can be maintained by a parent for the seduction of an adult child. The right of action is expressly given to the injured female.

It is claimed, in argument, that the petition does not show that the plaintiff’s daughter was of full age when she was seduced. If it does not so show, the petition is defective for that reason. The plaintiff cannot maintain the action without alleging and proving that his daughter was a minor. In the absence of such an allegation, the presumption is that she was of full age. The demurrer to the petition was rightly sustained. See *Humble v.*Shoemaker, 70 Iowa, 223.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anza Capital, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Vincent Rinehart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  December 14, 2005                          /s/ Vincent Rinehart
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   By:  Vincent Rinehart
                                                   Its:  Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anza Capital, Inc. and will be retained by Anza Capital, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission 

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on June 30, 2012 

 DOCKET 

NUMBER 

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME 

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING 

NOTICE 

DATE 

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING 

1 07-1796 

Pullman Power, 

LLC, and its 

successors 

09/24/08 DFR Chairman Rogers

2 07-1578 Elliot Construction 

Corp. 07/24/09 DFR 08/05/09 Closed 

3 08-0088 

Acme Energy 

Services d/b/a Big 

Dog Drilling, and 

its successors 

12/04/09 DFR 01/26/10 Closed 

4 08-1292 

Wal-Mart 

Distribution Center 

#6016 

01/12/10 DFR 01/25/10 Closed Commissioner 

Attwood 

5 08-1225 

K.E.R. 

Enterprises, Inc. 

d/b/a Armadillo 

Underground 

01/13/10 DFR 01/25/10 Closed 

6 08-0866 

Southern Pan 

Services 

Company 

04/15/10 DFR 05/05/10 Closed 

7 09-0240 Deep South Crane 

& Rigging Co. 04/22/10 DFR 05/06/10 Closed 

8 08-1547 United States 

Postal Service 04/29/10 DFR 05/21/10 Closed 

9 08-1318 LJC Dismantling 

Corp. 05/04/10 DFR 05/24/10 Closed 

10 09-0004 Stark Excavating, 

Inc. 06/15/10 DFR 06/28/10 Closed 

11 09-0005 Stark Excavating, 

Inc. 06/15/10 DFR 06/28/10 Closed 

12 07-0437 

Cleveland 

Wrecking 

Company 

07/28/10 DFR 09/22/10 Closed 

13 09-1072 

Boh Brothers 

Construction 

Company, LLC 

08/25/10 DFR 09/01/10 Closed 

14 09-1048 Brand Energy 

Solutions LLC 09/02/10 DFR 09/07/10 Closed 

15 08-1656 

Central Florida 

Equipment 

Rentals, Inc. 

09/08/10 DFR 10/22/10 Closed 

16 09-0555 

Shaw Global 

Energy Services, 

Inc. 

12/10/10 DFR 12/28/10 Closed 

17 10-0265 Jesco, Inc. 12/30/10 DFR 02/02/11 Closed 
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission 

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on June 30, 2012 

 DOCKET 

NUMBER 

RESPONDENT'S 

NAME 

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING 

NOTICE 

DATE 

BRIEFING 

STATUS 

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING 

18 10-0359 

American 

Engineering & 

Development 

Corporation 

02/04/11 DFR 03/03/11 Closed 

19 09-1278 Otis Elevator 

Company 02/14/11 DFR 03/01/11 Closed 

20 10-0551 

Ryder 

Transportation 

Services 

04/05/11 DFR 05/03/11 Closed 

21 09-1013 Wal-Mart Stores, 

Inc. 04/06/11 DFR 04/19/11 Closed Commissioner Attwood 

22 09-1451 

All Erection & 

Crane Rental 

Corp. 

04/13/11 DFR 04/27/11 Closed 

23 10-0610 E.R. Zeiler 

Excavating, Inc. 05/16/11 DFR 05/27/11 Closed 

24 08-1386 Delek Refining, 

Ltd. 06/08/11 DFR 06/14/11; 05/29/12 Reopened 

25 10-2659 

Jacobs Field 

Services North 

America 

10/27/11 DFR 11/22/11 Closed 

26 09-1901 Seward Ship’s 

Drydock, Inc. 11/14/11 DFR 11/21/11 Closed 

27 11-0977 

Custom Built 

Marine 

Construction, Inc. 

12/13/11 DFR 12/22/11 Closed 

28 10-1697 Spirit 

Aerosystems, Inc. 12/14/11 DFR 12/22/11 Closed 

29 10-1055 

Bardav, Inc., d/b/a 

Martha’s Vineyard 

Mobile Home Park 

03/02/12 DFR 03/29/12 Open 

30 09-1184 Dana Container, 

Inc. 03/28/12 DFR 04/25/12 Open 

31 11-0146 Lake Erie 

Construction Co. 05/18/12 DFR 05/24/12 Open 

* DFR – Direction for Review 

 REM – Appellate Remand 

 INT REV - Interlocutory Review
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10859]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER. Will the gentlewoman from Minnesota (Ms. McCollum) come 
forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Ms. McCOLLUM of Minnesota led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```