alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket No. 16-1167

AEROSPACE TESTING ALLIANCE,

Respondent.

BRIEFING NOTICE

The Commission requests that the parties brief the following issues:

(1) Whether the judge erred in finding that the hold-down piston guards do not 

comply with 29 C.F.R. § 1910.212(a)(1).

(2) Whether the judge erred in finding that employee exposure to the hazard was 

established. In addressing this issue, the parties are requested to discuss:

a. Did the judge err in failing to address whether the Secretary established actual 

exposure? See Phoenix Roofing, Inc., 17 BNA OSHC 1076, 1079 (No. 90-

2148, 1995) (“Exposure to a violative condition may be established by 

showing actual exposure or that access to the hazard was reasonably

predictable.”) If so, did the presence of the injured employee’s hand under the 

hold-down piston establish actual exposure to the cited hazard?

b. Even if actual exposure was shown, does the Secretary meet his burden of 

proof or is the Secretary required under the circumstances present here to 

prove that exposure was “reasonably predictable”? See Rockwell 

International Corp., 9 BNA OSHC 1092, 1097-1098 (No. 12470, 1980) (“The 

mere fact that it was not impossible for an employee to insert his hands under 

the ram of a machine does not itself prove that the point of operations exposes 

him to injury.”). If so, was reasonable predictability established?

(3) Whether the judge erred in finding that Respondent had knowledge of the 

violative conditions. In addressing this issue, the parties are requested to discuss
2

whether Respondent, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, could have known

of the alleged violative conditions.

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party that does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: November 20, 2017 /s/

John X. Cerveny

Executive Secretary

 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
#### STATE v. JAMES MATTHEWS.

*Indictment*— Burglary—Wife’s *Separate Property.*

While a husband and wife live together, the husband has a special property as bailee in the wife’s separate personal property which is in common use by them ; *Therefore,*in an indictment for burglary, where certain goods alleged to have been stolen, were the separate property of A’s wife, and were charged in the indictment as the property of A ; *Held*not to be error.

*(State*v. Wincroft, ante, cited and approved.}

INDICTMENT for Burglary, tried at Spring Term, 1876, of Robeson Superior Court, before McKoy, *J.*

The bill of indictment charged the defendant and Andy Wincroft with breaking and entering into the dwelling house of Joseph G-. Baxley, with intent to commit a felony. The defendants were tried separately, and the facts in this case are substantially the same as in the preceding case.

*42Under the charge of the Court below, the jury rendered a verdict of guilty. Judgment. Appeal by defendant.

*Attorney*General, for the State.

*Mr. W. McL.*McKay, for the defendant.

Rodman, J.

The prisoner after conviction moved fur a new trial for the following reasons:

1. That the indictment charged the felony to have been committed on 1 January, 1875, when the evidence showed it to have been committed on 4 December, 1875.

It is familiar learning that this variance is immaterial.

2. That the indictment charged that the house was the property of J. G-. Baxley, and that the bed-quilt and one pair of pants and one shirt were of the goods and chattels of said Joseph G. Baxley, wheu the evidence was that the bed-quilt and shirt were the property of his wife, and were her’s before her marriage in 1875.

As the evidence is not set out, it is impossible to say whether it proved the articles to have belonged to the husband or to the wife. And if the pants were proved to have been stolen, and they were the property of the husband, it would sustain the indictment. If all the articles had been the separate property of the wife, inasmuch as the husband and wife were living together in the house, and in the common use of the articles, they were properly alleged to be the property of the husband. *State v. Wincroft,*at this term.

These exceptions are clearly untenable. The exception taken to the instructions of the Judge is too general and does not specify any error. The Judge gave substantially the instructions prayed for. We see no positive error in those which he gave, although they appear- to us meagre, and not likely- to have beqn of much service to the jury. We would probably do an injustice to the Judge, if we as-*43snmed. that what is sent up to us, is a full report of his charge.

We have carefully examined the record and see no error in it.

There is no error. Let this opinion be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

136883 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r & (43) Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, SHUBH HOTELS DETROIT, LLC, J ustices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 136883 COA: 276666 Wayne CC: 05-535718-CK WELLS OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this C ourt. The motion for
admission pro hac vice is GRANTED.

1215 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 30, 2008

Clerk
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 9
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000491

13-DEC-2018

08:59 AM
----

(2004/C 84 E/0977)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0816/04

by Stefano Zappalà (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(15 March 2004)

Subject:   Recognition of diplomas

Mr Luca Ghezzi, a resident of Camucia di Cortona (Arezzo), is qualified to pursue the profession of industrial expert.

He applied for a teaching post with the Galilei Galileo ITIS (industrial and technical secondary school) in via D. Menci, Arezzo.

The director of the establishment refused to recognise Mr Ghezzi's qualification as conferring the requisite points, apparently disregarding the table laid down in (Italian) Ministerial Decree No 40 of 16 April 2003 implementing Directive 89/48/EEC (1) and Directive 92/51/EEC (2) and in point B(3) of Annex A to Ministerial Decree No 201 of 25 May 2000.

If the facts are as stated, what measures can the Commission take to ensure compliance with Community legislation and the corresponding national rules?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(26 April 2004)

The question raised by the Honourable Member prompts the following comments:

----

(1)OJ L 19, 24.1.1989, p. 16.

(2)OJ L 209, 24.7.1992, p. 25.

(3)  Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration, OJ L 19, 24.1.1989.

(4)  Council Directive 92/51/EEC of 18 June 1992 on a second general system for the recognition of professional education and training to supplement Directive 89/48/EEC, OJ L 209, 24.7.1992.

----
# Official Journal C 1A/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 1A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 504 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 1A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 504 January 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 001A/01 | Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 24th complete edition | 1 |
| 2007/C 001A/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — seventh supplement to the 24th complete edition | 48 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

Commission

2007/C 001A/01

Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 24th complete edition

1

2007/C 001A/02

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — seventh supplement to the 24th complete edition

48

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 62 

Designating the week beginning on February 8, 2015, as ‘‘National Tribal 

Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2015 

Ms. HEITKAMP (for herself, Mr. THUNE, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. 

DAINES, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. HOEVEN, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. MORAN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. PETERS, 

Ms. STABENOW, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. UDALL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning on February 8, 2015, as 

‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

Whereas there are 37 tribal colleges and universities operating on more than 75 campuses in 16 States; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities are tribally or federally chartered institutions of higher education and therefore have a unique relationship with the Federal Government; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities serve students from 

more than 250 federally recognized Indian tribes; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities offer students access 

to knowledge and skills grounded in cultural traditions 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 62 ATS 

and values, including indigenous languages, which enhance Indian communities and enrich the United States 

as a whole; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities provide access to high 

quality postsecondary education opportunities for American Indians, Alaska Natives, and other individuals living 

in some of the most isolated and economically depressed 

areas in the United States; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities are accredited institutions of higher education that effectively prepare students 

to succeed in their academic pursuits and in a global and 

highly competitive workforce; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities have open enrollment 

policies, and approximately 20 percent of the students at 

tribal colleges and universities are non-Indian; and 

Whereas the collective mission and considerable achievements 

of tribal colleges and universities deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning on February 

3 8, 2015, as ‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Univer4 sities Week’’; and 

5 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

6 interested groups to observe the week with appro7 priate ceremonies, activities, and programs to dem8 onstrate support for tribal colleges and universities. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      4,407,838
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      3,505,775
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              630,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 3,884,688
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      6,234,318
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        6,196,555
<LOANS>                                    80,952,211
<ALLOWANCE>                                   388,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            101,584,377
<DEPOSITS>                                 86,954,578
<SHORT-TERM>                                2,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         1,885,062
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        6,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 10,238,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            101,584,377
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             1,633,336
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             145,789
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               83,863
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            1,862,988
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            942,321
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            972,944
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         890,044
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  22,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               653,269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               292,113
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    292,113
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  178,398
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.77
<LOANS-NON>                                   437,915
<LOANS-PAST>                                  102,347
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              402,309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  41,230
<RECOVERIES>                                    5,284
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             388,862
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          388,862
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

      ( print page 86853)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 527 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-149, K2025-147.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25291 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



|                                           |  |                                             
|------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|CECO Group, Inc.                           |  | (Delaware)                                  
|CECO Filters, Inc.                         |  | (Delaware, subsidiary of CECO Group, Inc.)  
|CECO Abatement Systems, Inc.               |  | (Delaware, subsidiary of CECO Group, Inc.)  
|H.M. White, Inc. (f/k/a CECO Energy, Inc.) |  | (Delaware, subsidiary of CECO Group, Inc.)  
|CECOaire, Inc.                             |  | (Delaware, subsidiary of CECO Group, Inc.)  
|The Kirk & Blum Manufacturing Company      |  | (Ohio, subsidiary of CECO Group, Inc.)      
|kbd/Technic, Inc.                          |  | (Indiana, subsidiary of CECO Group, Inc.)   
|CECO Filters India Pvt. Ltd.               |  | (India, subsidiary of CECO Filters, Inc.)   
|New Busch Co., Inc.                        |  | (Delaware, subsidiary of CECO Filters, Inc.)
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2011/2005

of 8 December 2005         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005 of 2 September 2005 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2005/2006 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 2 to 8 December 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1438/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 December 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 8 December 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

(3)OJ L 228, 3.9.2005, p. 5.

----
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

Commission Monthly Case Activity for March 2015 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 34 

2. Cases Added to Docket 1 

A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc. 

No. 13-0224 

Direction for Review on 03/23/15 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket -2 

Jacobs Field Services North America 

No. 10-2659 

Decision on 03/04/15 

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 

No. 09-1013 

Final Order on 03/18/15 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 33
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 578 

Supporting Lights On Afterschool, a national celebration of afterschool 

programs held on October 20, 2016. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Ms. MIKULSKI, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting Lights On Afterschool, a national celebration of 

afterschool programs held on October 20, 2016. 

Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States 

have parents who work outside the home; 

Whereas high-quality programs that expand learning opportunities for children, such as afterschool, before-school, 

summer, and expanded learning opportunities, provide 

safe, challenging, engaging, and fun learning experiences, 

including experiences that encourage science, technology, 

engineering, and math, that help children and youth develop social, emotional, physical, cultural, and academic 

skills; 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 578 ATS 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs and high-quality 

expanded learning opportunities provide students with 

hands-on, engaging lessons that are aligned with the 

school day; 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs complement regular and expanded school days, and support working families by ensuring that the children of those families are 

safe and productive during the hours parents are working; 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs engage families, 

schools, and diverse community partners in advancing the 

well-being of children and youth in the United States; 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs that partner with 

high-quality community-based organizations build stronger communities by integrating the school with the larger 

community; 

Whereas Lights On Afterschool, a national celebration of 

afterschool, before-school, summer, and expanded learning opportunities programs, held on October 20, 2016, 

highlights the critical importance of those high-quality 

programs to children, their families, and their communities; and 

Whereas nearly 2 in 5 afterschool programs report that their 

budgets are in worse condition in 2016 than at the height 

of the recession in 2008, and more than 3 in 5 afterschool programs report that their level of funding is lower 

than it was in 2013, making it difficult for afterschool 

programs across the United States to keep their doors 

open and their lights on: Now, therefore, be it 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 578 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports Lights On After2 school, a national celebration of afterschool programs held 

3 on October 20, 2016. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 6, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-826

Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-203 & 11-948

________________

Luis A. Soro,

Appellant,

vs.

Jose L. Soro,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby Cynamon, Judge.

Luis A. Soro, in proper person.

Jerome Hurtak, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the initial brief, and finding no preliminary basis for

reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).

Affirmed.

2