55804 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 175 / Friday, September 9, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

the Congress and to the Comptroller 

General of the United States. EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of this final rule in the 

Federal Register. This final rule is not 

a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: August 31, 2011. 

Lois Rossi, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. Section 180.637 is amended by 

revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: 

§ 180.637 Mandipropamid; tolerances for 

residues. 

* * * * * 

(b) Section 18 emergency exemptions. 

Time-limited tolerances specified in the 

following table are established for 

residues of the mandipropamid, 4- 

chloro-N-[2-[3-methoxy-4-(2- 

propynyloxy)phenyl]ethyl]-a-(2- 

propynyloxy)-benzeneacetamide in or 

on the specified agricultural 

commodities, resulting from use of the 

pesticide pursuant to FFIFRA section 18 

emergency exemptions. The tolerances 

expire on the date specified in the table. 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

Expiration 

date 

Basil, dried ........ 240 12/31/12 

Basil, fresh ........ 20 12/31/12 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2011–22983 Filed 9–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0496; FRL–8881–6] 

Dicamba; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of dicamba in or 

on teff, forage; teff, grain; teff, straw; and 

teff, hay. Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4) requested these 

tolerances under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

September 9, 2011. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before November 8, 2011, and 

must be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under docket 

identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2010–0496. All documents in the 

docket are listed in the docket index 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available in the electronic docket at 

http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. 

S–4400, One Potomac Yard (South 

Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, 

VA. The Docket Facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laura Nollen, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 305–7390; e-mail address: nollen.

laura@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 

affected entities may include, but are 

not limited to those engaged in the 

following activities: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

This listing is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather to provide a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. Other types of 

entities not listed in this unit could also 

be affected. The North American 

Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes have been provided to 

assist you and others in determining 

whether this action might apply to 

certain entities. If you have any 

questions regarding the applicability of 

this action to a particular entity, consult 

the person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR 

site at http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/

text/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/

Title40/40tab_02.tpl. To access the 

harmonized test guidelines referenced 

in this document electronically, please 

go http://www.epa.gov/ocspp and select 

‘‘Test Methods and Guidelines.’’ 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2010–0496 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before November 8, 2011. Addresses for 

mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 

40 CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing that does not 

contain any CBI for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information not marked 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 175 / Friday, September 9, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 55805 

confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 

may be disclosed publicly by EPA 

without prior notice. Submit a copy of 

your non-CBI objection or hearing 

request, identified by docket ID number 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0496, by one of 

the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

II. Summary of Petitioned-For 

Tolerance 

In the Federal Register of October 22, 

2010 (75 FR 65321) (FRL–8851–1), EPA 

issued a notice pursuant to section 

408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 

346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a 

pesticide petition (PP 0E7779) by IR–4, 

500 College Rd. East, Suite 201W, 

Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition 

requested that 40 CFR 180.227 be 

amended by establishing a tolerance for 

residues of the herbicide dicamba, 3,6- 

dichloro-o-anisic acid, and its 

metabolite 3,6-dichloro-5-hydroxy-oanisic acid (5-OH dicamba), in or on 

teff, forage at 90.0 parts per million 

(ppm); teff, grain at 6.0 ppm; teff, straw 

at 30.0 ppm; and teff, hay at 40.0 ppm. 

That notice referenced a summary of the 

petition prepared on behalf of IR–4 by 

Helena Chemical Company, the 

registrant, which is available in the 

docket, http://www.regulations.gov. 

There were no comments received in 

response to the notice of filing. 

Based upon review of the data 

supporting the petition, EPA has revised 

the tolerance expression for all 

established commodities to be 

consistent with current Agency policy. 

The reason for this change is explained 

in Unit IV.C. 

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and 

Determination of Safety 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA 

allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the 

legal limit for a pesticide chemical 

residue in or on a food) only if EPA 

determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA 

defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 

pesticide chemical residue, including 

all anticipated dietary exposures and all 

other exposures for which there is 

reliable information.’’ This includes 

exposure through drinking water and in 

residential settings, but does not include 

occupational exposure. Section 

408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 

give special consideration to exposure 

of infants and children to the pesticide 

chemical residue in establishing a 

tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to infants and children from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue.’’ 

Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) 

of FFDCA, and the factors specified in 

section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has 

reviewed the available scientific data 

and other relevant information in 

support of this action. EPA has 

sufficient data to assess the hazards of 

and to make a determination on 

aggregate exposure for dicamba 

including exposure resulting from the 

tolerances established by this action. 

EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks 

associated with dicamba follows. 

In the Federal Register of April 2, 

2008 (73 FR 17914) (FRL–8356–6), EPA 

published a final rule establishing 

tolerances for combined residues of the 

herbicide dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic 

acid, and its metabolite, 3,6-dichloro-5- 

hydroxy-o-anisic acid in or on corn, 

sweet, forage at 0.50 ppm; corn, sweet, 

kernel plus cob with husks removed 

0.04 ppm; and corn, sweet, stover at 

0.50 ppm, based on EPA’s conclusion 

that aggregate exposure to dicamba is 

safe for the general population, 

including infants and children. Since 

2008, there have been no additional 

tolerance actions for dicamba. 

As noted in this unit, the current 

action concerns a tolerance for dicamba 

on teff. Teff is an intermediate grass that 

is morphologically and taxonomically 

similar to other cereal grains, including 

wheat. It is used to make flour in a 

manner similar to wheat and other 

cereal grains. EPA recently assessed the 

proposed use of dicamba on teff. In that 

assessment, EPA determined that 

aggregate dicamba exposures and risks 

will not increase as a result of the 

addition of the proposed teff uses to the 

uses assessed as part of the 2008 

rulemaking. Teff is not included in the 

Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by 

Individuals (CSFII). However, because it 

is used to make flour in a manner 

similar to wheat and other cereal grains, 

it will likely substitute in the diet for 

cereal grain foods which will contain 

similar residues of dicamba; therefore, a 

significant increase in dietary exposure 

to residues of dicamba from 

consumption of teff-containing foods 

will not occur. Furthermore, residues of 

dicamba in teff livestock feeds will be 

similar to those in other forages, hays, 

and silages for which tolerances of 

dicamba are currently established. As 

such, there would be no increase in the 

livestock dietary burden should teff be 

substituted in the livestock diet for 

other hays and silages; residues in meat, 

milk, poultry and eggs will remain the 

same. 

Further information about EPA’s risk 

assessment and determination of safety 

for this action can be found at http://

www.regulations.gov in document ‘‘2,4- 

D and Dicamba: Petition for the 

Establishment of Tolerances on Teff; 

Request for Registration of Latigo (EPA 

Reg. No. 5905–564) on Teff.’’ in docket 

ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0496. 

Except as supplemented by the 

information described in this unit, EPA 

is relying on the safety finding in the 

2008 rulemaking and the risk 

assessment underlying that action in 

establishing the tolerances for dicamba 

on teff, forage; teff, grain; teff, straw; and 

teff, hay. Further information regarding 

the safety finding for the last rulemaking 

can be found in the Federal Register of 

April 2, 2008 (73 FR 17917) (FRL–8356– 

6), at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAPEST/2008/April/Day-02/p6674.htm. 

For the 2008 rulemaking, the toxicity 

database was considered complete. 

However, recent changes to 40 CFR part 

158 imposed new data requirements for 

immunotoxicity testing (OPPTS 

Guideline 870.7800) and acute and 

subchronic neurotoxicity testing 

(OPPTS Guideline 870.6200) for 

pesticide registration. The toxicity 

database for dicamba includes 

acceptable acute and subchronic 

neurotoxicity studies; therefore, the 

requirements for the neurotoxicity 

screening battery have been met. 

Additionally, an immunotoxicity study 

was recently submitted and is currently 

under review. A screening level review 

of this study indicates that no effects, 

including immunotoxic effects, were 

observed at the highest dose tested of 

approximately 307 milligrams/ 

kilograms(mg/kg/day). This value is 

higher than the doses currently used for 

risk assessment; therefore, risk 

assessment endpoints will not change 

and the toxicity database is considered 

complete. 

Based upon the 2008 rulemaking and 

the other information discussed in this 

unit, EPA concludes that there is a 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

55806 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 175 / Friday, September 9, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to the general population, and to 

infants and children, from aggregate 

exposure to dicamba residues. Refer to 

the April 2, 2008 (73 FR 17914) (FRL– 

8356–6) Federal Register document, 

available at http://www.regulations.gov, 

for a detailed discussion of the aggregate 

risk assessments and determination of 

safety. EPA relies upon those risk 

assessments and the findings made in 

the Federal Register document in 

support of this action. 

IV. Other Considerations 

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology 

Adequate enforcement methodologies, 

Methods I and II—gas chromatography 

with electron capture detection (GC/ 

ECD), are available to enforce the 

tolerance expression. The methods are 

published in the Pesticide Analytical 

Manual (PAM) Volume II. The method 

may be requested from: Chief, 

Analytical Chemistry Branch, 

Environmental Science Center, 701 

Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350; 

telephone number: (410) 305–2905; email address: residuemethods@epa.gov. 

B. International Residue Limits 

In making its tolerance decisions, EPA 

seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with 

international standards whenever 

possible, consistent with U.S. food 

safety standards and agricultural 

practices. EPA considers the 

international maximum residue limits 

(MRLs) established by the Codex 

Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as 

required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). 

The Codex Alimentarius is a joint U.N. 

Food and Agriculture Organization/ 

World Health Organization food 

standards program, and it is recognized 

as an international food safety 

standards-setting organization in trade 

agreements to which the United States 

is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance 

that is different from a Codex MRL; 

however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) 

requires that EPA explain the reasons 

for departing from the Codex level. 

The Codex has not established MRLs 

for dicamba in or on commodities 

associated with this action. 

C. Revisions to Petitioned-For 

Tolerances 

The EPA has revised the tolerance 

expression to clarify: 

1. That, as provided in FFDCA section 

408(a)(3), the tolerance covers 

metabolites and degradates of dicamba 

not specifically mentioned; and 

2. That compliance with the specified 

tolerance levels is to be determined by 

measuring only the specific compounds 

mentioned in the tolerance expression. 

V. Conclusion 

Therefore, tolerances are established 

for residues of dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-oanisic acid, including its metabolites 

and degradates, in or on teff, forage at 

90.0 ppm; teff, grain at 6.0 ppm; teff, 

straw at 30.0 ppm; and teff, hay at 40.0 

ppm. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This final rule establishes tolerances 

under section 408(d) of FFDCA in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 

of actions from review under Executive 

Order 12866, entitled Regulatory 

Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993). Because this final rule 

has been exempted from review under 

Executive Order 12866, this final rule is 

not subject to Executive Order 13211, 

entitled Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, 

entitled Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). 

This final rule does not contain any 

information collections subject to OMB 

approval under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 

seq., nor does it require any special 

considerations under Executive Order 

12898, entitled Federal Actions to 

Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.) do not apply. 

This final rule directly regulates 

growers, food processors, food handlers, 

and food retailers, not States or tribes, 

nor does this action alter the 

relationships or distribution of power 

and responsibilities established by 

Congress in the preemption provisions 

of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, 

the Agency has determined that this 

action will not have a substantial direct 

effect on States or tribal governments, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States or tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined 

that Executive Order 13132, entitled 

Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999) and Executive Order 13175, 

entitled Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply 

to this final rule. In addition, this final 

rule does not impose any enforceable 

duty or contain any unfunded mandate 

as described under Title II of the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(UMRA) (Pub. L. 104–4). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 

(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section 

12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

VII. Congressional Review Act 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report to each House of 

the Congress and to the Comptroller 

General of the United States. EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of this final rule in the 

Federal Register. This final rule is not 

a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: August 31, 2011. 

Lois Rossi, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. Section 180.227 is amended by 

revising the introductory text in 

paragraphs (a)(1), (2), and (3); and 

alphabetically adding the following 

commodities to the table in paragraph 

(a)(1) to read as follows: 

§ 180.227 Dicamba; tolerances for 

residues. 

(a) General. (1) Tolerances are 

established for the residues of the 

herbicide dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 175 / Friday, September 9, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 55807 

acid), including its metabolites and 

degradates, in or on the commodities in 

the table below. Compliance with the 

tolerance levels is to be determined by 

measuring only the sum of the residues 

of dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid) 

and its metabolite, 3,6-dichloro-5- 

hydroxy-o-anisic acid, calculated as the 

stoichiometric equivalent of dicamba, in 

or on the following commodities: 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

* * * * * 

Teff, forage ................................. 90.0 

Teff, grain ................................... 6.0 

Teff, hay ...................................... 40.0 

Teff, straw ................................... 30.0 

* * * * * 

(2) Tolerances are established for 

residues of the herbicide dicamba, 3,6- 

dichloro-o-anisic acid, including its 

metabolites and degradates, in or on the 

commodities in the table below. 

Compliance with the tolerance levels is 

to be determined by measuring only the 

residues of dicamba (3,6-dichloro-oanisic acid) and its metabolite, 3,6- 

dichloro-2-hydroxybenzoic acid, 

calculated as the stoichiometric 

equivalent of dicamba, in or on the 

following commodities: 

* * * * * 

(3) Tolerances are established for 

residues of the herbicide dicamba, 3,6- 

dichloro-o-anisic acid, including its 

metabolites and degradates, in or on the 

commodities in the table below. 

Compliance with the tolerance levels is 

to be determined by measuring only the 

residues of dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-oanisic acid, and its metabolites, 3,6- 

dichloro-5-hydroxy-o-anisic acid, and 

3,6-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzoic acid, 

calculated as the stoichiometric 

equivalent of dicamba, in or on the 

following commodities: 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2011–23159 Filed 9–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0466; FRL–8882–1] 

Novaluron; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) for 

residues of novaluron in or on multiple 

commodities which are identified and 

discussed later in this document. 

Additionally, the Agency is amending 

existing tolerances for meat byproducts 

and revising commodity terms for hog 

and poultry byproducts. Interregional 

Research Project Number 4 (IR–4) 

requested the sweet corn tolerances; 

Makhteshim-Agan of North America, 

Inc. requested the food and feed 

handling establishment tolerances. 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

September 9, 2011. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before November 8, 2011, and 

must be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ). 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under docket 

identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2010–0466. All documents in the 

docket are listed in the docket index 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available in the electronic docket at 

http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 

2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The 

Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. 

to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The Docket 

Facility telephone number is (703) 305– 

5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer Gaines, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 305–5967; e-mail address: 

gaines.jennifer@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 

affected entities may include, but are 

not limited to those engaged in the 

following activities: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

This listing is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather to provide a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. Other types of 

entities not listed in this unit could also 

be affected. The North American 

Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes have been provided to 

assist you and others in determining 

whether this action might apply to 

certain entities. If you have any 

questions regarding the applicability of 

this action to a particular entity, consult 

the person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR 

site at http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/ 

text/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/ 

Title40/40tab_02.tpl. To access the 

harmonized test guidelines referenced 

in this document electronically, please 

go http://www.epa.gov/ocspp and select 

‘‘Test Methods and Guidelines.’’ 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2010–0466 in the subject line on 

the first page of your. All requests for a 

hearing must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before November 8, 2011. Addresses for 

mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing that does not 

contain any CBI for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information not marked 

confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 

may be disclosed publicly by EPA 

without prior notice. Submit a copy of 

your non-CBI objection or hearing 

request, identified by docket ID number 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES