alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QUICK

CARDTM

ProtectYourself

West Nile Virus

West Nile Virus (WNV) infection is an illness transmitted to

humans primarily by mosquitoes. Flooded areas, particularly

in warm climates, provide ideal conditions for mosquitoes to

breed in stagnant water. Bites from infected mosquitoes may

result in illnesses which range from mild flu-like conditions

(West Nile fever) to severe and sometimes life-threatening

diseases requiring hospitalization (West Nile encephalitis or

meningitis). If you have symptons of severe illness or have

concerns about your symptoms, seek immediate medical

assistance.

Signs & Symptoms of West Nile Fever (mild illness)

• Tiredness, headache, fever, body aches.

• Swollen lymph nodes, and/or a skin rash on the body.

Signs & Symptoms of West Nile Encephalitis

or Meningitis (severe illness)

• Nausea and vomiting.

• Headache, high fever, stiff neck.

• Disorientation (in very severe cases, coma).

• Tremors, convulsions and muscle weakness (in very

severe cases, paralysis).

Preventing Mosquito Exposure

• Reduce or eliminate mosquito breeding grounds (i.e.,

sources of standing water).

• Cover as much skin as possible by wearing light weight

long-sleeved shirts, long pants and socks when possible.

• Avoid use of perfumes and colognes when working outdoors.

• Use insect repellent containing an EPA-registered active

ingredient, such as DEET or Picaridin, on skin that is not

covered by clothing.

• Choose a repellent that provides protection for the

amount of time that you will be exposed. The more DEET

or Picaridin a repellent contains, the longer it will protect

you.

• Spray insect repellent on the outside of your clothing

(mosquitoes can bite through thin clothing).

• Do NOT spray insect repellent on skin that is under clothing.

• Do NOT spray on skin that is irritated or cut/lacerated.

• Do NOT spray aerosol or pump products in enclosed

areas or directly on your face. Do not allow insect repellent to contact your eyes or mouth. Do not use repellents

on cuts, wounds or irritated skin.

• After working, use soap and water to wash skin and

clothing that has been treated with insect repellent.

• Be extra vigilant at dusk and dawn when many types of

mosquitoes are most active.

OSHA 3278-09R 2012

U.S. Department of Labor

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)

For more information:

Occupational

Safety and Health

Administration
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 13, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 576 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-207, K2025-205.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26317 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# Official Journal L 380/24 D

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 380 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4724 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 380

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4724 December 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 2199/2004 of 10 December 2004 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2199/2004 of 10 December 2004 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6442
DONNIE LEE BRUCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAUL M. PEATROSS; JAMES L. CAMBLOSS, III; CHERYL HIGGINS; DENISE Y. LUNSFORD; DEBORAH K. HITE; EARL SHIFFLETT, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-97-163-2) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donnie Lee Bruce, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, app eals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court and deny Appellant's "Motion to Amend." Bruce v. Peatross , No. CA-97-163-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 1997). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00324-CV

Mark WYNNE and Premier General Holdings, Ltd.,

Appellants

v.

Dean DAVENPORT, et al.,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-CI-11585

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 26, 2009

DISMISSED

Before the court is appellants’ motion for voluntary dismissal. Appellants’ motion to dismiss

is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of appeal are taxed

against the appellants. See id. at (d). 

PER CURIAM
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26250]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[FR ID 260904]

Radio Broadcasting Services; AM or FM Proposals To Change the 
Community of License

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: The agency must receive comments on or before January 13, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, 202-418-2054, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Media Bureau shall provide notice in the 
Federal Register that an application to modify an AM or FM station's 
community of license has been filed. See 71 FR 76208, 76211 (published 
December 20, 2006). The following applicants filed AM or FM proposals 
to change the community of license: ZIMMER MIDWEST COMMUNICATIONS, 
INC., KBFL-FM, FAC ID NO. 33654, FROM: BUFFALO, MO, TO: FAIR GROVE, MO, 
FILE NO. 0000252190; DOCKINS BROADCAST GROUP, LLC, KPWB-FM, FAC ID NO. 
28121, FROM: PIEDMONT, MO, TO: MARQUAND, MO, FILE NO. 0000251701; 
SOUTHERN CULTURAL FOUNDATION, KVJB (FM), FAC ID NO. 762526, FROM: LAS 
ANIMAS, CO, TO: SWINK, CO, FILE NO. 0000253862; DELTA BROADCASTING, 
LLC, KYMO-FM, FAC ID NO. 69568, FROM: EAST PRAIRIE, MO, TO: BERTRAND, 
MO, FILE NO. 0000254766; ALLIANCE RADIO, LLC, WPNA-FM, FAC ID NO. 
74177, FROM; NILES, IL, TO: EVANSTON, IL, FILE NO. 0000255099; SSR 
COMMUNICATIONS, INC., KCAY(FM), FAC ID NO. 203590, FROM: DAMMERON 
VALLEY, UT, TO: ENTERPRISE, UT, FILE NO. 0000254789; AND ELIJAH RADIO, 
WLJL(FM), FAC ID NO. 764082, FROM: RIVERSIDE, AL, TO: LINCOLN, AL, FILE 
NO. 0000247585. The full text of these applications is available 
electronically via Licensing and Management System (LMS), https://apps2int.fcc.gov/dataentry/public/tv/publicAppSearch.html.

Federal Communications Commission.
Nazifa Sawez,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2024-26250 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10351 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

GARY E. LAROCK, JR.

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:13

- CR

- 44

- 1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gary E. Larock, Jr.,

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Larock h a s not filed a response . We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
December 20, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10351 Document: 00513805427 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016No. 16

- 10351

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-10351 Document: 00513805427 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
# L_2008275EN.01S00301.xml

| 16.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 275/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 275/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
#### Mollet, Respondent, vs. Bloedorn and wife, Appellants.

*October 13*

November *9, 1937.*

*84The cause was- submitted for the appellants on the brief of *Barber, Keefe, Patri & Stillman*of Oshkosh, and for the respondent on that of *Benton, Bosser, Becker & Parnell,*attorneys, and *David L. Fulton*of counsel, all of Appleton.

*85Fowler, J.

The defendants contend that the original contract shows what the consideration for the farm was, and that, certain payments having been specified in that contract, the rule prohibiting the change of the terms of a written instrument by parol testimony prevents the plaintiff from showing that any further payments were agreed to be made. They contend that as by the original contract they had agreed to pay only the debts therein specified, the subsequent agreement evidenced by the note in suit was without any- consideration whatever.

The plaintiff contends that while the original consideration was as stated in the contract, the parties to the transaction might thereafter orally and without any new consideration modify the contract by agreeing upon an additional consideration of payment to the plaintiff for his work; that a promise to pay such additional consideration was so made; and that such promise was enforceable by the plaintiff under the rule of *Tweeddale v. Tweeddale,*116 Wis. 517, 93 N. W. 440, and constituted a valid consideration for the note in suit.

The contentions of the plaintiff respecting the change of the terms of a written contract are sustained. See *Schoblasky v. Rayworth,*139 Wis. 115, 120 N. W. 822, and the cases therein cited. So also as to the rule of the *Tweeddale Case, supra.*This leaves for consideration only whether the findings of the trial court that bn October 1st, the date of the mother’s quitclaim deed, the mbther executed the deed “in consideration of the promise to her by the said defendants to pay to the plaintiff the amount owing to him ... [by the mother] for work, labor and services” in addition to the amount specified in the original contract, and that the note was given pursuant to the promise so made, are sustained by the evidence. These findings appear to us to be supported by the evidence of the mother as to the additional agreement and the testimony as to the circumstances under which the note was executed and delivered. No useful purpose would be served by detailing this testimony. While the de*86fendants deny the promise as testified to by the mother was made, the court might properly consider her testimony more trustworthy than that of the defendants, especially as she was making her home with the defendants, and living in amity with them at the time of the trial, and had been so living ever since the transaction involved was consummated.

*By the Court.*

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        DIGITAL DESCRIPTOR SYSTEMS, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Pellegrino, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Digital
Descriptor Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

Date: December 29, 2005


/s/ Michael Pellegrino
-------------------------------------
Michael Pellegrino
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 88762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25944]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-12350-01-R9]


Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Order on Petition for 
Objection to State Operating Permit for Ultramar Inc.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an order dated October 4, 2024, denying a petition dated July 13, 2024, 
from Dr. Genghmun Eng. The petition requested that the EPA object to a 
Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating permit renewal issued by the 
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to Ultramar Inc. 
for its refinery located in Wilmington, Los Angeles County, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nidia K. Trejo, EPA Region 9, (415) 
972-3968, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2868097989ddc9c9b969b93b2978293dc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="314543545b5e1f5f58555850715441501f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>. The final order and petition are 
available electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA received a petition from Dr. 
Genghmun Eng dated July 13, 2024, requesting that the EPA object to the 
issuance of operating permit renewal for Facility ID 800026, issued by 
SCAQMD to Ultramar Inc. in Wilmington, Los Angeles County, California. 
On October 4, 2024, the EPA Administrator issued an order denying the 
petition. The order itself explains the basis for the EPA's decision.
    Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner 
may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny 
issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later 
than January 7, 2025.

    Dated: November 2, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2024-25944 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2011219EN.01002102.xml

| 23.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/21

---

Order of the General Court of 7 June 2011 — Arcelor Mittal Espãna v Commission

(Case T-399/10) (1)

1

2011/C 219/34

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0341

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL RICHARD BONKO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 6, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 28 2021

05/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0341
----

(2004/C 88 E/0665)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3396/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(17 November 2003)

Subject:   Failure to pay compensation to Italian exiles in former Yugoslavia

The cultural association ‘Movimento nazionale Istria Fiume Dalmazia’ has for many years now been campaigning for recognition of the rights of the 350 000 Italian exiles who were obliged to leave Yugoslavia for historical reasons that are sufficiently well known.

Two agreements were concluded, at Osimo in 1975 and Rome in 1983, recognising the right to fair compensation of the Italian exiles who had been obliged to abandon their entire property. However, with the break-up of Yugoslavia, the successor states, Slovenia and Croatia, have failed to pay the agreed instalments. According to a recent study by the technical commission set up by Trieste province in cooperation with Rome province and the Trieste city council, the 1983 agreements need to be revised in order to put an end to the exclusion of foreign citizens under the ‘denationalisation’ laws and remove the bureaucratic obstacles to the purchase of property in Slovenia.

Can the Commission state:

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(9 January 2004)

The agreements concluded between Italy and Yugoslavia in 1975 and 1983 are bilateral agreements between two sovereign states concerning property ownership issues. Slovenia has informed the Commission that — as one of the successor states of Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) — it has taken over obligations as concerns compensations to be paid under the agreement.

The EC Treaty and the Treaty on the European Union do not prejudice systems of property ownership in the Member States — hence property ownership issues are a matter of national legislation. Hence the principles of the Treaties cannot be applied to property ownership matters.

As concerns the provisions of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Charter concerns Union institutions and Member States only when they implement Union legislation. As property ownership regimes are not regulated by Union law, the Charter is not applicable in this area.

----
# Official Journal C 439/18 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 439 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6318 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 439

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6318 December 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 439/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 439/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN