alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
f8k102010ex10lxxx_naturaln.htm


 


Exhibit 10.80


 



NaturalNano, Inc.


15 Schoen Place


Pittsford, NY 14534


 


October 20, 2010


 


Platinum Long Term Growth IV, LLC


152 West 57th Street 54th Floor


New York,NY 10019


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter shall serve as the agreement and promise of NaturalNano, Inc. (the "Company") to pay to the order of Platinum Long Term Growth IV, LLC. ("Platinum"), the sum of $16,923 plus interest at 8 % per annum. The Company acknowledges that Platinum has advanced $16,923 in funds at the Company's request, and the Company's obligations hereunder shall be secured by all other collateral that secures the various senior secured promissory notes that the Company has previously issued to Platinum. In the event the Company fails to repay Platinum in accordance with the terms of this letter, Platinum should be entitled to exercise all rights granted to it as a secured creditor pursuant to the Security Agreements (as defined in the Senior Secured Promissory Existing Notes issued to Platinum by the Company on or about March 7, 2007,August 4,2008, September 29,2008, and October 31, 2008).


 


All payments under or pursuant to this Note shall be made in United States Dollars, in immediately available funds, to Platinum at the address set forth above or at such other place as Platinum may designate from time to time in writing to the Company or by wire transfer of funds to Platinum's account, as requested by Platinum. The outstanding principal balance of this Note, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, shall be due and payable in full on January 15, 2011.


 


 


Very truly yours, 


 


Natural Nano, Inc.


 


 


By:  /s/ James Wemett                       


Name: James Wemett


Title: CEO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 13, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 25, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 548 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-173, K2025-171.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26278 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### EZEKIEL DOWDLE *vs.*WILLIAM STALCUP.

December 1842.

It is not necessary that the transcript of a record, containing the copyof an execution, should set forth that there was a seal to the execution.

Besides, if such an objection would lie, it should have been taken when the record was offered in evidence, and is too late on a motion for a ncjv trial.

■ Appeal from the Superior Court of Raw of Macon county, at Fail Term, 1842, his Honor Judge *Pearson*presiding-.

This was an action of Trover for a horse. After the jury were impannelled, the plaintiff’s counsel stated, that he was surprized by the fact that a record from Burke Superior Court, which he expected to- offer in evidence, had no seal to the Clerk’s certificate, or the seal was too indistinct to be identified, and intimated an intention to submit to a nonsuit. Thereupon, the defendant’s counsel consented that the re' cord might be read without objection for want of a seal. The record was read, and shewed a judgment against one Brit-tain, and an execution thereon against the property of Brit-tain, directed to the Sheriff of Macon, and an order for one Howell, the Sheriff of Haywood, to execute it, under the act of Assembly. A verdict was found for the plaintiff. A motion was made by defendant’s counsel for a new trial, on the ground, that it did not appear from the record read in evidence, that the execution under which Howell sold had a seal to it. The court refused to grant a new trial, because the objection had not been taken or noticed until after the trial, and for other reasons. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff pursuant to the verdict, and the defendant appealed.

*Glingman*for the plaintiff.

*Francis*for the defendant.

Daniel, J.

This was an action of Trover, tried in Ma-*46Con Superior Court. The plaintiff deduced his title *to the*in controversy, under a purchase at a Sheriff's sale of the property of one B. Brittain. He produced a transcript a rec01'd of a judgment obtained in - Court of Burke against Brittain, and an execution issued on the same to the Sheriff of Macon, under which execution he purchased the horse. The plaintiff obtained a verdict. The defendant moved for a new trial, because the court permitted the transcript oí the record of the execution to be read in evidence, when it did not appear by the same that there had been a seal of Burke Court affixed to the original execution. The court overruled the motion, and, we think, very properly. The transcript of the record of Burke was proper evidence; the seal to the original execution, (when the execution is proved by a transcript,) must *•prima facie*be presumed to have been affixed, as the record, from which the transcript is taken, never contains a *fac simile*of the seal; and, besides, had there been such an objection as that insisted on by the defendant, it was incumbent on him to make it upon the trial. It is too late for him to raise it upon a motion for a new trial.

Pee Cukxam. Judgment affirmed.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 756

AN ACT

To provide adversely affected crop producers with additional

time to make fully informed risk management decisions

for the 1999 crop year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 756 ES

1 SECTION 1. CROP INSURANCE OPTIONS FOR PRODUCERS

2 WHO APPLIED FOR CROP REVENUE COV3 ERAGE PLUS.

4 (a) ELIGIBLE PRODUCERS.—This section applies

5 with respect to a producer eligible for insurance under the

6 Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) who

7 applied for the supplemental crop insurance endorsement

8 known as Crop Revenue Coverage PLUS (referred to in

9 this section as ‘‘CRCPLUS’’) for the 1999 crop year for

10 a spring planted agricultural commodity.

11 (b) ADDITIONAL PERIOD FOR OBTAINING OR TRANS12 FERRING COVERAGE.—Notwithstanding the sales closing

13 date for obtaining crop insurance coverage established

14 under section 508(f)(2) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act

15 (7 U.S.C. 1508(f)(2)) and notwithstanding any other pro16 vision of law, the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

17 shall provide a 14-day period beginning on the date of en18 actment of this Act, but not to extend beyond April 12,

19 1999, during which a producer described in subsection (a)

20 may—

21 (1) with respect to a federally reinsured policy,

22 obtain from any approved insurance provider a level

23 of coverage for the agricultural commodity for which

24 the producer applied for the CRCPLUS endorse25 ment that is equivalent to or less than the level of

26 federally reinsured coverage that the producer ap-
3

S 756 ES

1 plied for from the insurance provider that offered

2 the CRCPLUS endorsement; and

3 (2) transfer to any approved insurance provider

4 any federally reinsured coverage provided for other

5 agricultural commodities of the producer by the

6 same insurance provider that offered the CRCPLUS

7 endorsement, as determined by the Corporation.

Passed the Senate March 25, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 756

AN ACT

To provide adversely affected crop producers with

agement decisions for the 1999 crop year.additional time to make fully informed risk man-
#### Bentle, Respondent, vs. Hoh and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Benton, Bosser, Becker & Parnell*of Appleton.

For the respondent: *Walter T. Kuchenherg,*attorney, and *James R. Joyce*of counsel, both of Appleton.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# Official Journal C 242A/22 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 242A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6322 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 242A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6322 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Securities and Markets Authority |
| 2020/C 242 A/01 | Vacancy notice — ESMA Chair (F/M) — REF.: ESMA/2020/VAC11/AD15 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Securities and Markets Authority

2020/C 242 A/01

Vacancy notice — ESMA Chair (F/M) — REF.: ESMA/2020/VAC11/AD15

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Harvey R. Blau, Chairman of the Board  of Aeroflex Incorporated, certify
that:

         The Form 10-K of Aeroflex Incorporated for the period ended June 30,
         2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Aeroflex Incorporated for the periods presented.

This certification is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic
report described herein nor shall it be deemed filed by Aeroflex Incorporated
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




                                        /s/ Harvey R. Blau
                                        ----------------------------------------

                                        Name: Harvey R. Blau

                                        Date: September 30, 2002
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10753-S10754]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

SENATE RESOLUTION 714--HONORING THE FIREFIGHTERS AND EMERGENCY WORKERS 
          WHO COURAGEOUSLY FOUGHT FIRES IN CALIFORNIA IN 2008

  Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. Feinstein) submitted the following 
resolution; which was considered and agreed to:

                              S. Res. 714

       Whereas, in 2008, there have been more than 10,000 
     wildfires in California started by natural causes and human 
     activity;
       Whereas more than 1,440,000 acres of Federal, State, and 
     local land in California burned in 2008;
       Whereas, in June 2008, fires started by lightning strikes 
     burned approximately 1,200,000 acres of Federal, State, and 
     local land in California, making the June fires the largest 
     single wildfire event in California's recorded history;
       Whereas 41 counties across California were impacted by 
     wildfires in 2008;
       Whereas more than 1,400 homes were destroyed by fires in 
     California in 2008;
       Whereas State and local firefighters have been called to 
     duty for increasingly long fire seasons, working on the front 
     lines of these fires for weeks;
       Whereas firefighters have risked their lives and endured 
     great hardship to protect lives, property, and the 
     environment in California;
       Whereas many firefighters were injured and 14 firefighters 
     tragically lost their lives in California in 2008;
       Whereas 25,000 firefighters and emergency response 
     personnel from California, 41 other

[[Page S10754]]

     States, and other nations worked side-by-side to fight the 
     wildfires;
       Whereas members of the National Guard from California and 
     other States provided essential support to the firefighting 
     effort; and
       Whereas the people of California and the United States 
     recognize the steadfast dedication of the firefighters 
     throughout the ongoing fire suppression and subsequent repair 
     and rebuilding efforts: Now, therefore, be it
       Resolved, That the Senate--
       (1) commends the firefighters and emergency workers from 
     California, 41 other States, and other nations for their 
     courageous actions and sacrifices in fighting wildfires in 
     California;
       (2) supports the continued work of firefighters to protect 
     National Forest System land, other public lands, and private 
     property from further damage;
       (3) praises the people of California for their great 
     courage in the face of the fires; and
       (4) extends heartfelt sympathy to the people who have lost 
     loved ones, homes, and businesses in the wildfires.

                          ____________________
```
SERVED: JULY 31,2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0620 

HEARING NOTICE 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on September 29 and 30, 2014, in Courtroom TBA, U.S. District Court, Northern District 

of Illinois, Everett McKinley Dirksen Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 1 Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each 

day. The parties should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper 

pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service . 

.... s· 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 The parties should confirm the courtroom with Larry Collins, Administrative Assistant to the Chief Judge, 

Room 2530A [312-435-5603; FAX 312-408-5088], prior to or on the day of hearing. 

1 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue, AGL-7 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7862 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

ONE COPY 

Martin A. Blumenthal, Respondent's Counsel 

Attorney 

One Northfield Plaza, Suite 300 

Northfield, IL 60093 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin; Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0620 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 417 

Celebrating the 144th anniversary of Arbor Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11, 2016 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself and Mr. SASSE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the 144th anniversary of Arbor Day. 

Whereas Arbor Day was founded in Nebraska City, Nebraska 

on April 10, 1872, to recognize the importance of planting trees; 

Whereas it is estimated that on the first Arbor Day, more 

than 1,000,000 trees were planted in the State of Nebraska alone; 

Whereas Arbor Day is observed in all 50 States and across 

the world; 

Whereas participating in Arbor Day activities promotes civic 

participation and highlights the importance of planting 

and caring for trees and vegetation; 

Whereas those activities provide an opportunity to convey to 

future generations the value of land and stewardship; 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 417 ATS 

Whereas National Arbor Day is observed on the last Friday 

of April each year; and 

Whereas April 29, 2016, marks the 144th anniversary of 

Arbor Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes April 29, 2016, as ‘‘National 

3 Arbor Day’’; 

4 (2) celebrates the 144th anniversary of Arbor 

5 Day; 

6 (3) supports the goals and ideals of National 

7 Arbor Day; and 

8 (4) encourages the people of United States to 

9 participate in National Arbor Day activities. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2009220EN.01003201.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/32

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 April 2008 — CPEM v Commission

(Case T-106/08 R) (1)

1

(Application for interim measures - Application for suspension of operation - New application - New facts - Absence - Inadmissibility - Article 109 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance)

2009/C 220/66

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Centre de promotion de l’emploi par la micro-entreprise (CPEM) (Marseilles, France) (represented by: C. Bonnefoi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Flynn and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of debit note No 3240912189 of 17 December 2007 relating to Commission Decision C(2007) 4645 of 4 October 2007, cancelling the assistance granted to CPEM by the European Social Fund (ESF) by Decision C(1999) 2645 of 17 August 1999

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 26.4.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 23(a)1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
2-78617, 33-54115, 33-58371, 33-60427, 333-31808, 333-44127, 333-73462,
333-110557, 333-110559, and 333-118061 on Form S-8 and Registration Nos.
33-3546, 333-09077, 333-64871, 333-65178 and 333-101349 on Form S-3 of our
reports dated February 28, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial
statements (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of a new accounting principle in
2003) and financial statement schedule of Southern Company and management's
report of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southern Company for the year
ended December 31, 2004.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
February 28, 2005
----

(2004/C 65 E/059)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0946/03

by Jorge Hernández Mollar (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject:   EU contribution to building the Málaga Picasso Museum

The Málaga authorities are hoping to emulate the Guggenheim Museum's contribution to Bilbao's modernisation and economic revitalisation, with the future Picasso Museum acting as a flagship for development and modernisation.

The fact that Málaga is hoping to repeat Bilbao's Guggenheim success means that all administrative levels should be making the maximum possible contribution to ensure that the new museum becomes a genuine flagship for Málaga as a modern city with more to offer than just sunshine and beaches.

What contribution is the Commission making to the building of the Málaga Picasso Museum, and how does it assess this project in terms of its contribution to the cultural wealth of the EU as a whole?

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(25 April 2003)

The Commission would like to draw the Honourable Member's attention to the fact that it did not contribute to the building of the Malaga Picasso Museum.

----