alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# -~-?: 

# '~l/~~ Chippewa

va"e0 

# REGIONAL AIRPORT
July29,2013

Mr. Dennis J, DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 

### 20590 L. c:: 

# .-- l.,J


### -P. N N

Dear Mr. DeVany, The Chippewa Valley Regional Airport Commission has reviewed the airservice proposal submitted by SkyWest Ai~ines. I have been in communication with the City of Eau Claire and we agree that the Airport Commission would provide this letteron behalfofthecommunity. On behalf of the Airport Commission, Iwould liketo express support forthe Skywest Ai~ines proposal to provide ai~ine service to the Chippewa Valley Regional Airport, The combination of the lower financial subsidy, CRJ aircraft, and non-stop service to Chicago O'Hare make the Skywest proposal attractive tothe community. TheAirport Commission is extremely pleased with the community response tothe service provided by SkyWest Ai~ines which began in March 2010. SkyWest has assisted the Airport with its marketing program and worked tooffer competitive airfares inan efforttofurther increase passenger traffic. In response to this increase in passenger lraffic, the Airport Commission is pleased that SkyWest has been able to reduce their subsidy request by almost $200,000 over the prior two year period. The Airport will work with SkyWest 10continue reducing that subsidy over the next two years with continued growth in passenger traffic. A recent airline passenger analysis indicated that more than 300,000 passengers traveling from the Chippewa Valley are departing from another Airport. Ihave already been Intouch with SkyWest Airlines to determine how we can work to capture some of those passengers and eliminate the need forfuture airservice subsidies. Thank you forproviding this opportunity 

### 10comment ontheSkyWesl Ai~lnes proposal toprovide airline service tothe Chippewa Valley Regional Airport Sincerely,



### 3800 Starr Avenue. Eau Claire, 

### WI 54703
. 715-839-6241 , admin@chippc\\,,!v,!lIeyairport.com www.chippewovolleyoirport.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000926978
<NAME>                        Frederick Brewing Co.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         208,292
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  777,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                   35,076
<INVENTORY>                                    840,836
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,032,015
<PP&E>                                         12,261,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                 938,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,597,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,825,147
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,041,796
<COMMON>                                       464
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,823,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,597,527
<SALES>                                        1,389,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,389,386
<CGS>                                          974,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  974,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,246,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,936,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,936,003)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.20)
        


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7090** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. GARY VINCENT WHORLEY, a/k/a Tyrone , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg
. Gina M. Groh , Chief District Judge. ( 3:15

- cr - 00010

- GMG

- RWT

- 1 )

Submitted : October 13, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gary Vincent Whorley, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gary Vincent Whorley appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion to produce notarized document .” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Whorley , No. 3:15

- cr - 00010

- GMG

- RWT

- 1 (N.D.W. V a ., Aug. 1, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would n ot aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1307. IN THE INTEREST OF C. M., a child. 

This appeal was docketed on April 7, 2021. Appellant C. M. has previously

moved this Court to supplement the record with the transcript of proceedings held in

Fulton County Juvenile Court on December 21, 2020 (before the transfer of the case

to Clayton County Juvenile Court, from which the appeal came). 

According to C. M., the clerk of Fulton County Juvenile Court notified her on

May 10, 2021 that the transcript of the December 21 hearing cannot be completed due

to “the poor quality of the recordings used to capture that proceeding.” C. M. now

moves this Court to remand the case for purposes of reconstructing the record

pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-41. 

The motion to REMAND is GRANTED. C. M. shall have 30 days after the

filing of the reconstructed transcript or its equivalent to file a new notice of appeal.

The pending motion to supplement the record is DENIED AS MOOT. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

May 27, 2021

05/27/2021
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Daniel
L. Johnston, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Able Energy Inc.;





2. Based on my
knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this Report;





3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this Report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Report is being prepared;




b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Report based on such evaluation; and




c) Disclosed in
this Report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.






November 13,
      2008
            /s/
      Daniel L. Johnston
              Daniel
      L. Johnston
              Chief
      Financial Officer
**Exhibit32**

 

# **CERTIFICATION**

# ** **

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersignedChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, ofCanterbury Park Holding Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certify that:

 

(1)          The accompanyingquarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                       | Canterbury Park Holding Corporation        |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                       |
| Dated:  May  14, 2004 | /s/ Randall D. Sampson                     |   |
|                       | Randall D. Sampson,                        |
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                       |                                       |
| Dated:  May  14, 2004 | /s/ David C. Hansen                        |   |
|                       | David C. Hansen,                           |
|                       | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                            |                                            |  |  |

 

1

----
Exhibit 10(a)9

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") made and entered into by and between The Southern Company ("Southern"), Alabama Power Company (the "Company") and Mr. Charles Douglas McCrary ("Mr. McCrary") (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties") is effective December 31**,**2008.  This Agreement amends and restates the Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement entered into by Mr. McCrary, Southern and the Company, effective January 1, 2007. 

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, Mr. McCrary is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company; 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to provide to Mr. McCrary certain severance benefits under certain circumstances following a change in control (as defined herein) of Southern or the Company;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and the agreements of the Parties set forth in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

 

1

 

 

----
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I M ELD A CO N TRERA S G O N ZA LES, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71043 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 952- 052 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Im el da C on tre ra s G on za l es , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f G uat em al a, pet i t i on s pro s e f orr e vi e w of

the de c i s i on of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s a f f i rm i ng the i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s deni alof her app l i cat i on for c ance l l at i on of re m ov alre l i ef 

# FI LED JU N 03 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71043 2 base d o n h erfa i l ure t o est abl i sh the re qu i si t e har dshi p t o h erU ni t ed S t at es ci t i ze n c hi l dr e n. C ontr e r a s G onz a l e s c ont e nds tha tthe B I A e rr e d i n de ny i ng he rc anc e l l a t i on ap p lic a tio n b e c au s e h e rU n ite dS ta te s c itiz e n c h ild r e n w ill e x p e r ie n c e h ar d s h ip if she i s r em ov ed t o G uat em al a. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the IJ ’ s di sc re t i on ary h ar d s h ip d e te rm in a tio n . See Mendez- Castro v. Mukasey , 5 5 2 F .3 d9 7 5 , 9 8 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ; s e e a ls o R o m e r o - T o rr es v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 2 7 F .3 d8 8 7 , 8 9 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D I SM I SSED .
Exhibit 32(b)

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification

I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-QSB of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp.

 

 

 

| Date: May 12, 2006 |                                                                                                                                                        |   |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| By:                | /s/ Robert Lee Whitehead                                                                                                                                    |   |   |  |
|               |  

 

 

Robert Lee WhiteheadVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

  |
**ALLIED
      SECURITY INNOVATIONS, INC.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Allied Security Innovations, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Anthony Shupin, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Allied Security Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by Allied Security
      Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.




Date:
                      November 8, 2007/s/ Anthony
                      ShupinAnthony
                      Shupin
                    President
                        and Chief Executive
                        Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

DANTE MORRIS, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civ. Action No. 11-0549 (ESH)

) 

FEDERAL ACQUISITION )

POLICY DIVISION, )

)

 Respondent. )

____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM

Petitioner, a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Fort Dix, New Jersey,

seeks a writ of habeas corpus, but he has named the wrong respondent and has filed in the wrong

court. “The writ[] or order to show cause [why the writ should not be granted] shall be directed

to the person having custody of the person detained.” 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Furthermore, "a district

court may not entertain a habeas petition involving present physical custody unless the

respondent custodian is within its territorial jurisdiction.” Stokes v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 374

F.3d 1235, 1239 (D.C. Cir. 2004); see Rooney v. Sec’y of Army, 405 F.3d 1029, 1032 (D.C. Cir.

2005) (habeas “jurisdiction is proper only in the district in which the immediate . . . custodian is

located") (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). 

The Federal Acquisition Policy Division is not a proper habeas respondent, and

petitioner’s recourse lies, if at all, in the United States District Court for the District of New

Jersey. Accordingly, this action will be dismissed. A separate order accompanies this

Memorandum. 

 /s/ 

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE

DATE: March 21, 2011 United States District Judge
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0824

DCN CBM00666A1 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
##  	  Job Safety and Health Decisions Available on Compact Computer Disk

 

 

 

 

**JOB SAFETY AND HEALTH DECISIONS AVAILABLE ON COMPACT COMPUTER DISK**

Hundreds of legal decisions resolving disputes over whether employers violated workplace safety and health rules can now be read, printed and researched using a compact computer disk with read only memory (CD-ROM), the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission announced today.

OSHRC Administrative Law Judge and Commission Decisions on CD ROM will be sold to the public through its publisher, the Government Printing Office, GPO Stock No. 1070-L-01.  OSHRC is the independent Federal agency that issues the decisions, which arise from contests of workplace safety and health inspections. A one-year subscription costs $31 for domestic purchasers; individual copies are $13 for domestic purchasers and $16.25 for foreign purchasers and can be obtained by calling the Superintendent of Documents of the GPO at 202-512-1800.  The current publication is a three-disk set covering agency final decisions issued from January 1993 through October 1998; it will be updated quarterly.

The new CD ROM replaces the publication of agency decisions on microfiche. It contains complete texts of all substantive agency legal decisions and a copy of the Adobe, Inc. Acrobat 3.0 Reader with Search.  Copies of the disk will also be provided by GPO to municipal and university libraries that serve as depository libraries for U.S. government documents.

Installation and user instructions are included with the CD-ROM.
Exhibit
32.3





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of National Property Analysts Master
Limited Partnership (“NPAMLP”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, David A. Simon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
EBL&S Property Management, Inc., Agent for NPAMLP and the equivalent of its
Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of NPAMLP.





National
      Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership(Registrant)Date:
                  November 12, 2009By:
                  EBL&S Property Management, Inc., Agent for
      NPAMLPBy:
                  /s/ David A. SimonName:
                  David
      A. SimonTitle:
                  Vice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ELI ROSA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 422 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of April, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# Official Journal L 224/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 224 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5918 August 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 224

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5918 August 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1376 of 8 August 2016 laying down technical information for the calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds for reporting with reference dates from 30 June until 29 September 2016 in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1376 of 8 August 2016 laying down technical information for the calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds for reporting with reference dates from 30 June until 29 September 2016 in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.