alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26348]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 31, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
426 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-241, K2025-239.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26348 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
## Swanson , Bria n (OST) hmr^QgTr.L^^ f- %(*0 ^



# —^i^Mp/O P From : Fran k J

. Valac h [fjvalach@midrivers.com ] '"-'' •OnTATlDK f Sent : Tuesday , January25 , 2011 12:4 5 P M ~ , (P"] ' DPFPArb^uf , To : Swanson , Bria n (OST ) ^^'^CW//U^' 6 Subject : IVIontan aEA S •;'] < i ..i , « 

## ^^^/J4A/ n p 2:0 0 Dea r Bria nSwanson , Tomorro wmornin g i a mtakin g a fligh t fro mLewistown , Montan a t o Dallas/For t Wort hvi a Denver . Thi s ha s m e thinkin g ho wfortunat e I hav e bee nove r th e las t severa l year s t o hav e had thi s direc t fligh t t o Denve r whic hallowe d m e t o mak e connection s t o citie s acros s th e U.S . Som e peopl e i ncontro l o f decision s fo r Montan a EA S hav e decide d w e d o no t nee d flight s t o Denve r bu t onl yt o Billing s resultin g i na switc ho f carriers . I questio ni f thi s decisio ni s wha t th e majorit yo f passenger s want . I kno wtha t Grea t Lake s Aviatio nha s no t bee nperfec t b yan ysens e o f th e word . Ther e hav e bee nman

yfligh t cancellation s and schedul e problems . Grea t Lake s offer s servic e t o Billing s fo r thos e communitie s tha t wan t it . Mayb e GLAneede d t o b e hel d mor e accountabl e fo r th e promise s the ymade . I nth e futur e havin g servic e onl yt o Billing s mean s mor e plan e changes , waitin g time , et c t o ge t t o citie s beyond Billings . Thi s add s t o th e alreadylon g daytryin g t o fl yinto/ou t o f smal l townMontana . Previousl yBi g SkyAirline s provide d EA S servic e fro mMontan a town s t o Billings . Thi s obviousl ydi d no t work . Ar e w e jus t goin g bac k t o thos e days ? I s thi s chang e a don e deal ? I s i t possibl e fo r individua l town s t o selec t thei r choic e o f carrier ? I woul d appreciat e an ythought s yo u migh t hav e regardin g thi s matter . Than k yo u fo r you r time . Sincerely , Frank D . Valac h
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

JUDY C. PARKER

Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

November 7, 2019

Eric Coats

Attorney at Law

1716 South Polk Street

Amarillo, TX 79102

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Jawone O'Neal Lee Riles

TDCJ-ID #02257072

Fort Stockton Unit

1536 IH-10 East

Fort Stockton, TX 79735 Warren L. Clark

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

Randall County Justice Center

2309 Russell Long Boulevard, Suite 120

Canyon, TX 79015

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-19-00153-CR, 07-19-00154-CR;

Trial Court Case Number: 27,687-B, 28,575-B

Style: Jawone ONeal Lee Riles v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel and Mr. Riles:

The Court this day issued an opinion and judgment in the captioned cause. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 48.

In addition, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(b)(2), exhibits on file with

this Court, if any

, will be destroyed three years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier

date if ordered by the Court.

Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable John B. Board (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Joel Forbis (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
#### J. R., B. F. and G. G. GARY, Exec’rs. to the use of W. H. Harris and wife *v.*JAMES JOHNSON and J. J. LONG.

An action brought by the original obligees of a note, to the use of a *feme*plaintiff and her husband, is subject to be set oil by an account for medical services rendered the *feme*plaintiff before her marriage.

Civil action, on a bond for money, tried at the Spring Term, 1874, of .Northampton Superior Court, before *Albert-son', J.,*and a jury.

The plaintiffs declared in debt, before the Code of Civil Procedure, on two bonds amounting in the aggregate to $130, with interest, payable to the plaintiff's, executors of R. B. Gary, and executed by the defendant Johnson as principal, and *69Long as surety. The bonds were transferred by the executors to the guardian of the *feme*beneficial plaintiff, the wife of Smith, in part payment of a legacy coming to her under the will of their testator; and were transferred by said guardian, upon the majority of the *feme*plaintiff, to Smith, her husband, in part settlement of his guardian account. The execution of the bonds was admitted.

The defendants relied upon the plea of payment and set off', and offered in evidence an account for medical services rendered by the defendant, Dr. James Johnson, to the said *feme*plaintiff and her slaves, during her minority and at the request of her said guardian, who at the time held the bonds now sued upon. The amount of the defendant’s account and interest was about the same as that of the bonds. This evidence, the Court excluded, and the defendants excepted.

The defendant then offered to prove that he had not made any effort to collect his account, because he held it as an offset to said bonds. This was also excluded, and the defendants again excepted.

There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs; from which judgment, the defendants appealed.

Peebles, for appellants..

No counsel *contra*in this Court.

Reade, J.

The device of suing in the name of the original obligees to the use of the beneficial plaintiffs instead of in the name of the beneficial plaintiffs themselves, amounts to nothing. The defendants, set off attached when the bonds were in the hands of the guardian of *the feme*beneficial plaintiff. And now it would be against conscience to allow them to be collected for her use out of the defendant, while she is indebted to the de*-fendant an equal amount.

There is error.

Pee Cukiam. *Venire de novo.*
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41358

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO DANIEL LOPEZ-PENA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-03-CR-418-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Francisco Daniel Lopez-Pena appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Lopez-Pena contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony”

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. 

He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one

under the lesser included offense found in 8 U.S.C. § 1362(a),

his judgment must be reformed to reflect a conviction only under
No. 03-41358

-2-

that provision, and his sentence must be vacated and the case

remanded for resentencing to no more than two years’ imprisonment

and one year of supervised release. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Lopez-Pena acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 2, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1879

Lower Tribunal No. F21-7542

________________

Guillermo Penalver,

Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Zachary 

James, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Deborah Prager, Assistant 

Public Defender, for petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney 

General, for respondent.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Guillermo Penalver seeks a writ of certiorari quashing the trial court’s 

order denying his motion to dismiss based on stand your ground immunity 

filed pursuant to section 776.032, Florida Statutes (2020). The trial court, 

based on its conclusion that Penalver’s motion below was not sworn and did 

not rely on record evidence, together with Penalver’s failure to present any 

evidence or testimony to support his claim of immunity, denied the motion.

For the reasons discussed herein, we grant the petition, quash the trial

court's order, and remand with instructions.

While Penalver’s petition was pending in this Court, we issued 

Casanova v. State, 46 Fla. L. Weekly D2326 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 27, 2021), 

holding:

[A] defendant’s motion to dismiss under Florida's Stand Your 

Ground law can establish a prima facie claim of self-defense 

immunity from criminal prosecution even though the motion to 

dismiss is not sworn to by someone with personal knowledge or 

supported by evidence or testimony establishing the facts in the 

motion to dismiss.

We therefore grant the petition for a writ of certiorari, quash the order 

below, and remand for further proceedings consistent with Casanova.

Petition granted; order quashed.
**Exhibit 31(f)2**

**SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Michael W. Southern, certify that:

1.

 I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Southern Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 26, 2007

/s/Michael W. Southern

Michael W. Southern

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
David Garofalo, Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited ("Agnico-Eagle"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

The
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Agnico-Eagle for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Agnico-Eagle.

|Toronto, Canada
May 26, 2006 |  | By: | /s/DAVID GAROFALODavid Garofalo Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Agnico-Eagle and will be retained by Agnico-Eagle and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

47

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10869]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, the Reverend Daniel P. Coughlin, offered the following 
prayer:
  Lord of the ages, ever-faithful to Your promises, be with Your 
people, now and forever.
  The sun grows dim and the daylight is measured. In the darkness, 
phantoms loom. The eye cannot discern as the distance fades. Be for us 
light.
  Help Your people make clear judgments that will propel us into the 
future. Remove any shadowy cloud so we follow the patterns of silent 
stars.
  O Lord of the ages, ever-faithful to Your promises, be with Your 
people now and forever.
  Amen.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 21


<PAGE>


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                               As of June 30, 1997



Subsidiary                                               State of Incorporation
Agway Consumer Products, Inc...........................................Delaware
Agway Data Services, Inc...............................................Delaware
Agway Financial Corporation............................................Delaware
Agway General Agency, Inc..............................................New York
Agway Holdings Inc.....................................................Delaware
Agway Insurance Company................................................New York
Agway Petroleum Corporation............................................Delaware
Agway Realties, Inc....................................................Delaware
Milford Fertilizer Company.............................................Delaware
Telmark Inc............................................................New York
Texas City Refining, Inc. (1)..........................................Delaware



Notes:
(1)   Agway  Petroleum  Corporation  owns 67% of Texas City  Refining,  Inc.  In
      September  1993,  Texas  City  Refining,  Inc.,  filed  a  certificate  of
      dissolution in the office of the Delaware Secretary of State; in September
      1996, Texas City Refining, Inc. was dissolved.
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on May 31, 2010

DOCKET NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S NAME
DOCKETED
TYPE*
BRIEFING NOTICE
DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
1
94-1374
Dayton Tire,
Bridgestone/Firestone
03/27/97
DFR
08/01/97
Closed
2
94-3393
Southern Scrap Materials Co.,
Inc.
11/24/97
DFR
01/30/98
Closed
3
98-0755
Avcon, Inc., Vasilios N. Saites
and Nicholas Saites
09/28/00
DFR
11/29/00
Closed
4
98-1168
Avcon, Inc., Vasilios N. Saites
and Nicholas Saites
09/28/00
DFR
11/29/00
Closed
5
00-1402
Sharon and Walter
Construction, Inc.
09/05/01
DFR
10/18/01
Closed


6


99-0958
Vasilios N. Saites, individually, and d/b/a Altor, Inc. and/or Avcon, Inc.; and Nicholas Saites, individually, and d/b/a
Altor, Inc., and/or Avcon, Inc.


02/01/02


DFR


05/01/02


Closed
7
02-1164
Loretto-Oswego Residential
Health Care Facility (RHCF)
01/27/04
DFR
02/23/05
Closed
8
02-1174
Loretto-Oswego Regional
Health Care Facility (RHCF)
01/27/04
DFR
02/23/05
Closed
9
05-0839
Summit Contractors, Inc.
06/29/06
DFR
05/24/07
Closed
10
06-1990
AKM LLC d/b/a Volks
Constructors
07/27/07
DFR
10/18/07
Closed
11
06-1036
Compass Environmental, Inc.
03/03/08
DFR
03/14/08
Closed
12
07-0645
Erickson Air-Crane,
Incorporated
03/18/08
DFR
04/11/08
Closed
13
07-1796
Pullman Power, LLC and its
successors
09/24/08
DFR


14
07-1045
ConocoPhillips Bayway
Refinery
11/25/08
DFR
12/18/08
Closed
15
07-1578
Elliot Construction Corp.
07/24/09
DFR
08/05/09
Closed
16
06-1542
Thomas Industrial Coatings,
Inc.
09/23/09
DFR
10/07/09
Closed
17
07-1350
MVM Contracting Corp.
09/23/09
DFR
10/01/09
Closed

18

08-0088
Acme Energy Services d/b/a Big Dog Drilling, and its
successors

12/04/09

DFR

01/26/10

Open
19
05-0055
L&L Painting Company, Inc.
12/22/09
DFR
02/02/10
Closed
20
08-1292
Wal-Mart Distribution Center
#6016
01/12/10
DFR
01/25/10
Closed
21
07-1851
Associated Underwater
Services
01/13/10
DFR
01/29/10
Closed
22
08-1225
K.E.R. Enterprises, Inc. dba
Armadillo Underground
01/13/10
DFR
01/25/10
Closed
23
09-1284
Shaw Areva Mox Services, LLC
01/20/10
DFR
01/29/10
Closed

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on May 31, 2010

DOCKET NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S NAME
DOCKETED
TYPE*
BRIEFING NOTICE
DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
24
08-1037
Nuprecon, LP
02/13/10
DFR
03/29/10
Open
25
08-0866
Southern Pan Services Co.
04/15/10
DFR
05/05/10
Open
26
09-0240
Deep South Crane and Rigging
Co.
04/22/10
DFR
05/06/10
Open
27
08-1547
United States Postal Service
04/29/10
DFR
05/21/10
Open
28
08-1389
Pike Electric, Inc.
05/04/10
DFR
05/06/10
Open
29
08-1318
LJC Dismantling Corp.
05/04/10
DFR
05/24/10
Open
*	DFR – Direction for Review REM – Appellate Remand
INT REV - Interlocutory Review
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         6,698
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 16,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                       621,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                79,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               588,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                      309,748
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                       20
<COMMON>                                         105
<OTHER-SE>                                   244,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 588,548
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              72,121
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 36,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            17,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            9,335
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (117)
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9,218
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .90



</TABLE>