Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 34063 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under Executive Order 

13211, Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have determined that this action is one 

of a category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves 

establishing a temporary safety zone for 

a fireworks display. The fireworks are 

launched from navigable waters of the 

United States and may negatively 

impact the safety or other interests of 

waterway users and near shore activities 

in the event area. The activity includes 

fireworks launched from barges near the 

shoreline that generally rely on the use 

of navigable waters as a safety buffer to 

protect the public from fireworks 

fallouts and premature detonations. 

This action is necessary to protect 

persons and property during the project. 

This rule is categorically excluded from 

further review under paragraph 34(g) of 

Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. An environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

and a Categorical Exclusion 

Determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T05–0315 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T05–0315 Safety Zone for Fireworks 

Display, Patapsco River, Inner Harbor; 

Baltimore, MD. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

safety zone: All waters of the Patapsco 

River, within a 100 yards radius of a 

fireworks discharge barge in 

approximate position latitude 39°16′56′′ 

N., longitude 076°36′19′′ W., located in 

the Inner Harbor at Baltimore, 

Maryland. All coordinates refer to 

datum NAD 1983. 

(b) Regulations. The general safety 

zone regulations found in 33 CFR 

165.23 apply to the safety zone created 

by this temporary section, § 165.T05– 

0315. 

(1) All persons are required to comply 

with the general regulations governing 

safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23. 

(2) Entry into or remaining in this 

zone is prohibited unless authorized by 

the Coast Guard Captain of the Port 

Baltimore. All vessels underway within 

this safety zone at the time it is 

implemented are to depart the zone. 

(3) Persons desiring to transit the area 

of the safety zone must first obtain 

authorization from the Captain of the 

Port Baltimore or his designated 

representative. To seek permission to 

transit the area, the Captain of the Port 

Baltimore and his designated 

representatives can be contacted at 

telephone number 410–576–2693 or on 

Marine Band Radio VHF–FM channel 

16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard 

vessels enforcing this section can be 

contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF– 

FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon 

being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard 

vessel, or other Federal, State, or local 

agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing 

light, or other means, the operator of a 

vessel shall proceed as directed. If 

permission is granted, all persons and 

vessels must comply with the 

instructions of the Captain of the Port 

Baltimore or his designated 

representative and proceed as directed 

while within the zone. 

(4) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast 

Guard may be assisted in the patrol and 

enforcement of the zone by Federal, 

State, and local agencies. 

(c) Definitions. As used in this 

section: 

Captain of the Port Baltimore means 

the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard 

Sector Baltimore, Maryland. 

Designated representative means any 

Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or 

petty officer who has been authorized 

by the Captain of the Port Baltimore to 

assist in enforcing the safety zone 

described in paragraph (a) of this 

section. 

(d) Enforcement period. This section 

will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. through 

10:30 p.m. on July 2, 2015. 

Dated: May 29, 2015. 

Kevin C. Kiefer, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the 

Port Baltimore. 

[FR Doc. 2015–14633 Filed 6–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0652; FRL–9929–07– 

Region–3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Pennsylvania; Update of the Motor 

Vehicle Emissions Budgets and 

General Conformity Budgets for the 

Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 1997 8-Hour 

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard Maintenance Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions 

submitted by the Commonwealth of 

Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania). These 

revisions consist of an update to the 

motor vehicle emissions budgets 

(MVEBs) for nitrogen oxides (NOX) for 

the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) 

maintenance SIP for the Scranton/

Wilkes-Barre 1997 8-Hour Ozone 

NAAQS Maintenance Area (Scranton/

Wilkes-Barre Maintenance Area or 

Area). These SIP revisions also include 

general conformity budgets for the 

construction of the Bell Bend Nuclear 

Power Plant. In addition, these SIP 

revisions include updated point and 

area source inventories for NOX. EPA is 

approving these revisions to the 

Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with 

the requirements of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA). 

DATES: This final rule is effective on July 

15, 2015. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
34064 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

Number EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0652. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the electronic docket, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for 

public inspection during normal 

business hours at the Air Protection 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Pennsylvania 

Department of Environmental 

Protection, Bureau of Air Quality 

Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market 

Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Asrah Khadr, (215) 814–2071, or by 

email at khadr.asrah@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

On March 10, 2015 (80 FR 12604), 

EPA published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPR) for revisions to the 

Pennsylvania SIP. In the NPR, EPA 

proposed approval of an update to the 

MVEBs, updates to the point and area 

source inventories, and general 

conformity budgets for the construction 

of the Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant. 

The formal SIP revision was submitted 

by Pennsylvania on May 28, 2014. 

II. Summary of SIP Revision 

Pennsylvania’s SIP revisions revised 

the MVEBs for the Scranton/WilkesBarre Maintenance Area to reflect the 

use of the MOVES model; made updates 

to the point and area source inventories; 

and established general conformity 

budgets for the construction of the Bell 

Bend Nuclear Power Plant. A detailed 

discussion of the SIP revisions can be 

found in the SIP submittal, NPR, and 

technical support document (TSD) in 

this docket. The rationale for EPA’s 

action is explained in the NPR and will 

not be restated here. No public 

comments were received on the NPR. 

III. Final Action 

EPA is approving an update to the 

MVEBs for the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 

Maintenance Area, updates to the point 

and area source inventories for NOX, 

and general conformity budgets for the 

construction of the Bell Bend Nuclear 

Power Plant as revisions to the 

Pennsylvania SIP. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by August 14, 2015. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. 

This action which approves an update 

to the MVEBs for the Scranton/WilkesBarre Maintenance Area, updates to the 

point and area source inventories, and 

general conformity budgets for the 

construction of the Bell Bend Nuclear 

Power Plant may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: June 1, 2015. 

William C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 34065 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart NN—Pennsylvania 

■ 2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph 

(e)(1) is amended by revising the entry 

‘‘8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan and 

2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory’’ 

for ‘‘Scranton/Wilkes-Barre Area: 

Lackawanna, Luzerne, Monroe and 

Wyoming Counties’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.2020 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

(1) * * * 

Name of non-regulatory 

SIP revision 

Applicable geographic 

area 

State 

submittal 

date 

EPA Approval date Additional explanation 

*******

8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan and 2002 

Base Year Emissions 

Inventory.

Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 

Area: Lackawanna, 

Luzerne, Monroe and 

Wyoming Counties.

6/12/07 11/14/07 

72 FR 64948.

5/28/14 6/15/15 [Insert Federal 

Register citation].

Revised 2009 and 2018 Motor Vehicle Emission 

Budgets. Revised 2009 and 2018 point source 

inventories. Revised 2018 area source inventory. General conformity budgets for the construction of the Bell Bend Nuclear Power 

Plant. See sections 52.2043 and 52.2052. 

*******

* * * * * 

3. Section 52.2043 is amended by 

adding paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) to 

read as follows: 

§ 52.2043 Control strategy for 

maintenance plans: ozone. 

* * * * * 

(d) As of June 15, 2015, EPA approves 

the following revised 2009 and 2018 

point source inventory for nitrogen 

oxides (NOX) for the Scranton/WilkesBarre 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance 

Area submitted by the Secretary of the 

Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection: 

Applicable geographic area Year 

Tons 

per 

day 

NOX

Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 1997 

8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area ........................ 2009 7.7 

Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 1997 

8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area ........................ 2018 5.8 

(e) As of June 15, 2015, EPA approves 

the following revised 2018 area source 

inventory for nitrogen oxides (NOX) for 

the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 1997 8-Hour 

Ozone Maintenance Area submitted by 

the Secretary of the Pennsylvania 

Department of Environmental 

Protection: 

Applicable geographic area Year 

Tons 

per 

day 

NOX

Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 1997 

8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area ........................ 2018 7.5 

(f) As of June 15, 2015, EPA approves 

the following general conformity 

budgets for 2009 and 2018 for nitrogen 

oxides (NOX) for the Scranton/WilkesBarre 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance 

Area submitted by the Secretary of the 

Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection: 

Applicable geographic area Year 

Tons 

per 

day 

NOX

Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 1997 

8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area ........................ 2009 1.0 

Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 1997 

8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area ........................ 2018 1.0 

4. Section 52.2052 is amended by 

adding paragraph (d) to read as follows: 

§ 52.2052 Motor vehicle emissions 

budgets for Pennsylvania ozone areas. 

* * * * * 

(d) As of June 15, 2015, EPA approves 

the following revised 2009 and 2018 

Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets 

(MVEBs) for nitrogen oxides (NOX) for 

the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 1997 8-Hour 

Ozone Maintenance Area submitted by 

the Secretary of the Pennsylvania 

Department of Environmental 

Protection: 

Applicable geographic area Year 

Tons 

per 

day 

NOX

Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 1997 

8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area ........................ 2009 59.3 

Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 1997 

8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area ........................ 2018 30.5 

[FR Doc. 2015–14440 Filed 6–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0176; FRL–9928–63] 

Di-n-butyl carbonate; Exemption From 

the Requirement of a Tolerance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of di-n-butyl 

carbonate (CAS Reg. No. 542–52–9) 

when used as an inert ingredient 

(solvent) in pesticide formulations 

applied to growing crops, raw 

agricultural commodities after harvest, 

and animals, and when used as an inert 

ingredient in antimicrobial pesticide 

formulations in food-contact surfaces 

sanitizer products at a maximum level 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES