alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.1AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORPORATION
COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(Dollars in millions)

|                                         |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | - | ----- | 
|                                         |  | Years
  Ended December 31, |      
|                                         |  |                            |      
|                                         |  | 2005                       |       | 2004 |   | 2003  |  | 2002 |       | 2001 |  
|                                         |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |  
|Earnings:                                |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|Net income                               |  | $                          | 415   |      | $ | 234   |  | $    | 260   |      | $ | 228   |  | $ | 277   | 
|Income tax provision                     |  |                            | 50    |      |   | 75    |  |      | 135   |      |   | 118   |  |   | 140   | 
|Interest expense                         |  |                            | 1,141 |      |   | 863   |  |      | 852   |      |   | 916   |  |   | 1,458 | 
|                                         |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|Total earnings (a)                       |  | $                          | 1,606 |      | $ | 1,172 |  | $    | 1,247 |      | $ | 1,262 |  | $ | 1,875 | 
|                                         |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|                                         |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|Fixed charges - interest expense (b)     |  | $                          | 1,141 |      | $ | 863   |  | $    | 852   |      | $ | 916   |  | $ | 1,458 | 
|                                         |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a/b) |  |                            | 1.41  |      |   | 1.36  |  |      | 1.46  |      |   | 1.38  |  |   | 1.29  | 
|                                         |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 

---
#### Metzinger, Appellant, vs. Perry and another, Respondents.

*September 11*

October *9, 1928.*

*19For the appellant there was a brief by *McGovern, Lyons, Curtis, Devos & Reiss*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *F. E. McGovern.*

*John F. Baker*of Milwaukee, for the respondents.

Eschweiler, J.

An. examination of the record in this case convinces us that the right result was reached and no injustice to plaintiff done thereby, and for those reasons as well as by the authority of sec. 274.37, Stats., the judgment, should and must be affirmed. *Braun v. M., St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co.*170 Wis. 10, 17, 172 N. W. 743.

The appellant has numerous assignments of error as grounds for his claim that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted. None of them, however, can have any substantial effect upon the controlling feature of this case, which i's embodied in the jury’s findings that the assault and battery on the plaintiff by conductor Perry was done with the use of only the necessary force to repel an assault and threatened battery by the plaintiff, and which findings are amply supported. This renders immaterial a discussion of the details of many of the alleged errors.

*20The admission by Perry, through his pleading and testimony, of the use of force in self-defense, then properly placed the burden in this case upon plaintiff to satisfy the jury by a fair preponderance of the evidence that Perry used more than reasonable or necessary force in such self-defense, and the court so properly charged the jury. *Ogodziski v. Gara,*173 Wis. 371, 377, 181 N. W. 227.

• The court charged the jury to the effect that if they found that plaintiff used abusive or insulting language toward Perry at the time of the striking, then such language might be considered in mitigation of plaintiff’s compensatory damages. This was error, for0such evidence would be proper for consideration only on the question of punitory damages. *Korney v. Boyd,*186 Wis. 594, 597, 203 N. W. 371. This went only to the question of damages and is immaterial.

We see nothing to be gained by a further discussion of the many questions so earnestly úrged upon our attention by appellant’s counsel. If there were errors on the trial they could not now be permitted to change the result reached in the court below.

*By the Court,*— Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2333-E2334]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       IN MEMORY OF STUDS TERKEL

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. DANNY K. DAVIS

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, November 20, 2008

  Mr. DAVIS of Illinois. Madam Speaker, on October 31st America lost 
its unofficial historian laureate: Louis ``Studs'' Terkel.
  Because he was so modest, Studs would deny it, but in fact he created 
a new genre of literature and history--the oral history.
  Studs and his tape recorder probed every corner of our collective 
consciousness with the delicacy and certainty of a brain surgeon.
  He interviewed the famous and the infamous, the rich and the poor, 
the celebrity and the common man and woman.
  Invariably he was able to extract something very special, a strand of 
the grand story which is America. He recorded those stories in books 
such as Division Street: America, Hard Times: An Oral History of the 
Great Depression, Working: People Talk About What They Do All Day and 
How They Feel About What They Do, The Good War, Race: What Blacks and 
Whites Think and Feel About the American Obsession, Talking to Myself: 
A Memoir of My Times, Will the Circle Be Unbroken: Reflections on 
Death, Rebirth and Hunger for Faith, and Hope Dies Last: Keeping Faith 
in Difficult Times.
  Madam Speaker, we all have conversations of all types every day. But 
Studs was able to turn his conversations into oral history because he 
was not just a passive observer of history, he was an active maker of 
history.
  Studs earned a JD degree from the University of Chicago, but he never 
practiced law. Instead he apprenticed for his future career with a job 
in a writers project in the Works Progress Administration writing plays 
and learning the craft of acting.
  He went on to become one of the founders of the Chicago school of TV 
by creating and hosting ``Studs' Place'' until he was blacklisted 
during the McCarthy period.
  He spoke out for progressive causes, refusing to compromise his 
principles.
  He finally found a home at WFMT, Chicago's classical radio station, 
where he created his own version of talk radio with great conversation 
and an eclectic selection of music, signing off each broadcast with 
Woody Guthrie's classic line, ``Take it easy, but take it.''

[[Page E2334]]

  Studs had an irrepressible sense of humor and delighted in composing 
his own epitaph: ``Curiosity did not kill this cat.''
  Studs was as much a part of Chicago as his friends Nelson Algren and 
Mike Royko but like Mark Twain he is claimed by all America. We will 
miss him.

                          ____________________
```
----

Action brought on 28 March 2004 by Patrick Rousseaux against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-125/04)

(2004/C 118/106)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 28 March 2004 by Patrick Rousseaux, resident in Brussels, represented by Nicolas Lhoëst, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court of First Instance should:

Pleas and main arguments

The applicant in these proceedings who, on his recruitment in October 1986, was classified in Grade A7, step 3, challenges the decision of the appointing authority classifying him, on revision, in Grade A6, step 2, and not in Grade A6, step 3, refusing to reconstitute his career and limiting the date of effect of the decision on his reclassification to 5 October 1995.

The pleas raised are identical to those in Case T-125/04 Rousseaux v Commisison

In support of his claims he asserts:

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                     MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward B. Lipkin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property
Analysts Master Limited Partnership;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 10, 2006

By: EBL&S, Inc., its managing general partner


By: /s/ Edward B. Lipkin
    ---------------------------------
Name: Edward B. Lipkin
Title: President
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:FAA-2011-0308 service document
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cecil Bancorp, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the issuer and have:
    5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    By:
    /s/ Robert Lee WhiteheadRobert Lee WhiteheadVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) Page 21
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26314]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 573 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-204, K2025-202.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26314 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**EXHIBIT
32**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Community Bankshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J.
Alton Wingate, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and I, Harry L. Stephens, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 
 Date:
      May 13, 2005
    BY:
      /S/ J. Alton
      WingateJ.
      Alton WingatePresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      May 13, 2005
    BY:
      /S/ Harry L.
      StephensHarry
      L. Stephens
      Executive
      Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 149 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 4174, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following corrections: 

5 (1) Page 2, beginning line 13, strike ‘‘has the 

6 meaning given the term ‘Executive agency’ under 

7 section 105’’ and insert ‘‘means an agency referred 

8 to under section 901(b) of title 31’’. 
2 

•HCON 149 EH 

1 (2) Page 19, line 13, insert ‘‘for data that does 

2 not concern monetary policy’’ after ‘‘open data 

3 plan’’. 

4 (3) Page 32, beginning line 6, strike ‘‘career’’ 

5 and all that follows through ‘‘title 5)’’ and insert 

6 ‘‘nonpolitical appointee employee’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 21, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 149 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

H.R. 4174. to make certain corrections in the enrollment of
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7618

MALCOLM E. PFEIFFER-EL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RICK JACKSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-939-5-BO) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 8, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malcolm E. Pfeiffer-El, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Malcolm E. Pfeiffer-El seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pfeiffer-El v. Jackson , No. CA-00- 939-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.1

                               Amendment Number 1
                                       to
                             SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

                           Zero Coupon Bonds Due 2010
                                  With Warrants
                        to subscribe for common shares of
                             Shinsung Eng. Co. Ltd.


                          Dated as of FEBRUARY 23, 2001
                                -----------------
                               ("Effective Date")



         Shinsung Eng. Co. Ltd. ("Issuer") and PRI Automation, Inc.
("Purchaser") hereby agree that the Subscription Agreement dated November 30,
2000 for Zero Coupon Bonds Due 2010 with warrants to subscribe for common shares
of Shinsung Eng. Co. Ltd. ("Agreement") shall be modified as follows:

1.       Exhibit B, TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF WARRANTS, is modified by adding the
following subsections to Section 2, Subscription Right:

                  C. Upon exercise of the Warrants into common stock, the
                     Purchaser is restricted from selling or transferring the
                     common stock for a period of 33 days after the date of said
                     warrant exercise.

                  D. The warrants in the Agreement are restricted and may not be
                     transferred or sold to any third party.

2.       In all other respects the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full
force and effect.

         Issuer and Purchaser have each instructed their duly authorized
representatives to execute this Amendment as of the effective date.


Shinsung Eng. Co. Ltd.                             PRI Automation, Inc.

By: _________________                              By: ______________________

Title: ________________                            Title: _____________________
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 186 (Thursday, December 11, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10958]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     AUTHORITY TO MAKE APPOINTMENTS

  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that 
notwithstanding the upcoming recess or adjournment of the Senate, the 
President of the Senate, the President pro tempore, and the majority 
and minority leaders be authorized to make appointments to commissions, 
committees, boards, conferences, or interparliamentary conferences 
authorized by law, by concurrent action of the two Houses, or by order 
of the Senate.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**ALLIED
      SECURITY INNOVATIONS, INC.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Allied Security Innovations, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
      Pellegrino, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Allied Security Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by Allied Security
      Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.




Date:
                May 14, 2007
            
            /s/ Michael
                PellegrinoMichael
                PellegrinoChief Financial
                Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2331]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   HONORING DAVID PHILIP ISEMAN, JR.

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. SAM GRAVES

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, November 20, 2008

  Mr. GRAVES. Madam Speaker, I proudly pause to recognize David Philip 
Iseman, Jr. of Lee's Summit, Missouri. David is a very special young 
man who has exemplified the finest qualities of citizenship and 
leadership by taking an active part in the Boy Scouts of America, Troop 
1391, and earning the most prestigious award of Eagle Scout.
  David has been very active with his troop, participating in many 
Scout activities. Over the many years David has been involved with 
Scouting, he has not only earned numerous merit badges, but also the 
respect of his family, peers, and community.
  Madam Speaker, I proudly ask you to join me in commending David 
Philip Iseman, Jr. for his accomplishments with the Boy Scouts of 
America and for his efforts put forth in achieving the highest 
distinction of Eagle Scout.

                          ____________________
```