alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on October 31, 2010

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE*

BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

1 94-3393 Southern Scrap Materials Co., 

Inc. 11/24/97 DFR 01/30/98 Closed

2 98-0755 Avcon, Inc., Vasilios N. Saites 

and Nicholas Saites 09/28/00 DFR 11/29/00 Closed

3 98-1168 Avcon, Inc., Vasilios N. Saites 

and Nicholas Saites 09/28/00 DFR 11/29/00 Closed

4 00-1402 Sharon and Walter 

Construction, Inc. 09/05/01 DFR 10/18/01 Closed

5 99-0958

Vasilios N. Saites, individually, 

and d/b/a Altor, Inc. and/or 

Avcon, Inc.; and Nicholas 

Saites, individually, and d/b/a

Altor, Inc., and/or Avcon, Inc. 

02/01/02 DFR 05/01/02 Closed

6 02-1164 Loretto-Oswego Residential 

Health Care Facility (RHCF)

01/27/04 DFR 02/23/05 Closed

7 02-1174 Loretto-Oswego Regional 

Health Care Facility (RHCF)

01/27/04 DFR 02/23/05 Closed

8 06-1990 AKM LLC d/b/a Volks 

Constructors 07/27/07 DFR 10/18/07 Closed

9 07-0645 Erickson Air-Crane, 

Incorporated 03/18/08 DFR 04/11/08 Closed

10 07-1796 Pullman Power, LLC and its 

successors

09/24/08 DFR

11 07-1578 Elliot Construction Corp. 07/24/09 DFR 08/05/09 Closed

12 06-1542 Thomas Industrial Coatings, 

Inc. 09/23/09 DFR 10/07/09 Closed

13 08-0088

Acme Energy Services d/b/a 

Big Dog Drilling, and its 

successors

12/04/09 DFR 01/26/10 Closed

14 05-0055 L&L Painting Company, Inc. 12/22/09 DFR 02/02/10 Closed

15 08-1292 Wal-Mart Distribution Center 

#6016 01/12/10 DFR 01/25/10 Closed

16 07-1851 Associated Underwater 

Services 01/13/10 DFR 01/29/10 Closed

17 08-1225 K.E.R. Enterprises, Inc. dba 

Armadillo Underground 01/13/10 DFR 01/25/10 Closed

18 09-1284 Shaw Areva Mox Services, LLC 01/20/10 DFR 01/29/10 Closed

19 08-1037 Nuprecon, LP 02/13/10 DFR 03/29/10 Closed

20 08-0866 Southern Pan Services Co. 04/15/10 DFR 05/05/10 Closed

21 09-0240 Deep South Crane and Rigging 

Co. 04/22/10 DFR 05/06/10 Closed

22 08-1547 United States Postal Service 04/29/10 DFR 05/21/10 Open

23 08-1389 Pike Electric, Inc. 05/04/10 DFR 05/06/10 Open
Page 2 of 2

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on October 31, 2010

DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE*

BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

24 08-1318 LJC Dismantling Corp. 05/04/10 DFR 05/24/10 Open

25 09-0004 Stark Excavating, Inc. 06/15/10 DFR 06/28/10 Closed

26 09-0005 Stark Excavating, Inc. 06/15/10 DFR 06/28/10 Closed

27 07-0437 Cleveland Wrecking Company 07/28/10 DFR 09/22/10 Open

28 09-1072 Boh Brothers Construction 

Company, LLC 08/25/10 DFR 09/01/10 Open

29 09-1048 Brand Energy Solutions LLC 09/02/10 DFR 09/07/10 Open

30 08-1656 Central Florida Equipment 

Rentals, Inc. 09/08/10 DFR 10/22/10 Open

31 10-1021 C.P. Buckner Steel Erection, 

Inc. 09/28/10 DFR 10/20/10 Open

32 08-0316 Cranesville Block Company / 

Clark Division 10/15/10 DFR

33 08-0317 Cranesville Block Company / 

Clark Division 10/15/10 DFR

* DFR – Direction for Review

REM – Appellate Remand

INT REV - Interlocutory Review
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of
ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 8, 2007



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                      
|Paritosh K. Choksi                          
|Executive Vice President of General Partner,
|Principal Financial Officer of Registrant   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2021163EN.01003502.xml

| 3.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/35

---

Order of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Kassl (STUDIO KASSL)

(Case T-7/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 163/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J.F. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Kassl Holding BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 October 2020 (Case R 880/2020-4), relation to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés and Kassl.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.

---
----

Action brought on 2 May 2005 by Bart Nijs against the Court of Auditors of the European Communities

(Case T-171/05)

(2005/C 182/71)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 2 May 2005 by Bart Nijs, Bereldange (Luxembourg), represented by Fränk Rollinger, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant in the present case, having also brought the action lodged in Case T-377/04, (1) contests the decisions of the defendant awarding him promotion points for 2003 and establishing his staff report for that year, and its decision not to promote him in 2004 to the post of reviser in the Dutch translation unit.

In support of his claims he relies on pleas of:

----

(1)  Case T-377/04 Nijs v Court of Auditors (OJ 2004 C 284, 20.11.2004, p. 26).

----
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
 

Commission Monthly Case Activity for November 2010
 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 33 

2. Cases Added to Docket 2 

Boh Brothers Construction Company, LLC
 

No. 09-0239
 

Direction for Review on 11/04/10
 

Trinity Yachts, LLC
 

No. 09-1123
 

Direction for Review on 11/19/10
 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket -2 

Sharon and Walter Construction, Inc.
 

No. 00-1402
 

Decision and Order issued on 11/18/10
 

Boh Brothers Construction Company, LLC
 

No. 09-0239
 

Remand Order issued on 11/30/10
 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 33
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 31, 1997 AND THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                             238
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                       900
<INVENTORY>                                      8,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,875
<PP&E>                                           8,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,261
<BONDS>                                          9,965
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,610
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           989
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,103)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,722
<SALES>                                         47,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,743
<CGS>                                           40,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   730
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,168)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        36
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,204)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,204)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7287

MELVIN DOUGLAS BERROW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (1:05-cv-00019-JAB)

Submitted: January 28, 2008 Decided: February 7, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Douglas Berrow, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Douglas Berrow moves for a certificate of

appealability, seeking to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Berrow has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis

and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 103/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.103.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 103 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 525 May 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.103.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 103

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 525 May 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 103/01 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 1,25 % on 1 May 2009 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2009/C 103/02 | Results of sales of wine alcohol held by public agencies | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2009/C 103/03 | Extract from the Decision concerning Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg S.A. pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions | 19 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 103/01

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 1,25 % on 1 May 2009 — Euro exchange rates

1

2009/C 103/02

Results of sales of wine alcohol held by public agencies

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2009/C 103/03

Extract from the Decision concerning Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg S.A. pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions

19

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 103/04 | Prior notification of a concentration — (Case COMP/M.5380 — Air France-KLM/Royal Air Maroc/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 20 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 103/05 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 21 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2009/C 103/04

Prior notification of a concentration — (Case COMP/M.5380 — Air France-KLM/Royal Air Maroc/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

20

OTHER ACTS

Commission

2009/C 103/05

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

21

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             856,347
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,889,742
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      2,794,433
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,260,550
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,001,050
<LOANS>                                        103,901,983
<ALLOWANCE>                                        472,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,747,574
<DEPOSITS>                                      96,466,633
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,050,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,142,340
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             6,190
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,082,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 124,747,574
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,092,410
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  135,208
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    67,544
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,295,162
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,036,101
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,184,304
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,110,858
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       81,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    851,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    351,598
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         219,081
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       219,081
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        3.74
<LOANS-NON>                                        796,492
<LOANS-PAST>                                       198,884
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   431,929
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       48,375
<RECOVERIES>                                         7,650
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  472,704
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               472,704
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0




</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31(d)1**

**GULF POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Susan N. Story, certify that:

1.

 I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gulf Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 26, 2007

/s/Susan N. Story

Susan N. Story

President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6197

R. J. KEYSTONE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON; GARY L. BASS; JAMES SISK;

MICHAEL J. COMBS,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (7:05-cv-00366-jct)

Submitted: October 20, 2006 Decided: November 7, 2006

Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

R. J. Keystone, Appellant Pro se. William W. Muse, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

R. J. Keystone seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Keystone has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
June 18, 2015

Ms. Enda Cusack

33 Four Brooks Circle

Stamford, CT 06903

Dear Ms. Cusack:

This is in response to your February 18, 2015, letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2015-0400) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Edna Cusack for an exemption from §§ 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Edna Cusack to conduct aerial photography and videography using an unmanned aerial system.

By email dated March 24, 2015, which posted to the docket March 31, 2015, the FAA sent you a request for additional information asking you to provide : the specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of the relief you seek; the reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; and any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. The FAA has not received additional information to support why granting the request would be in the public

interest.

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Acting Director Office of Rulemaking