alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 180/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.180.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 180 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 536 July 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.180.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 180

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 536 July 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2010/C 180/01 | Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 11 and 23 November 2009, 14 December 2009, 19 April 2010 and 5 July 2010 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament | 1 |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 180/02 | Euro exchange rates | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2010/C 180/01

Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 11 and 23 November 2009, 14 December 2009, 19 April 2010 and 5 July 2010 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament

1

European Commission

2010/C 180/02

Euro exchange rates

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2015205EN.01001501.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 March 2015 — Lidl Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. KG v Freistaat Sachsen

(Case C-134/15)

(2015/C 205/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Lidl Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. KG

Appellant:

Respondent: Freistaat Sachsen

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 5(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 (1) compatible with the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), in conjunction with Articles 15(1) and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 5(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 (1) compatible with the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), in conjunction with Articles 15(1) and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?

1

| 2. | Is Article 5(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 compatible with the second subparagraph of Article 40(2) TFEU? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 5(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 compatible with the second subparagraph of Article 40(2) TFEU?

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 of 16 June 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards the marketing standards for poultrymeat (OJ 2008 L 157, p. 46).

1

---
## Martin. Michael (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject:
Dear Mr. Martin, Justin Mandel <justin.mandel@gmail.com> Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:21 PM Martin, Michael (OST) Altoona-Blair Airport

As Iwas unable to attend the airport authority meeting this evening, Iwanted to ensure that voice was hear on the subject of anew subsidized airline serving Altoona airport. While Iunderstand some people may prefer a larger aircraft, they appear to be uneconomical serving ADO. My family and I,and many others Iknow in the area would bevery likely to useservices that connected to both Pittsburgh and/or Dulles more frequentlywith smaller aircraft. Reading that fares could beaslow as$59 each way this seems to beavery attractive proposition. Much more than the current services operating from ADO. More frequent services would allow usto make more connections from these bigger airports. Aswe would be inside the air-side area of the airport once arriving in PITor lAD, we would be more likely to originate our travel atADO rather than making the 2-3 hour drive to a hub airport. Inshort, we would like to see more frequent services to more airports at better prices, regardless of the equipment type. Best regards, Justin
Justin Mandel 814-931-6282 (NEW NUMBER) justin. mandel@gmail.com

1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with AAPC on May 23, 2011

FROM: Don Kopinski

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on May 23, 2011 between AAPC and EPA staff. 

The following people attended:

AAPC member companies: Barbara Kiss, Steve Fornetti, Cynthia Williams, Ken 

McAlinden, Gary Oshnock, Mike Hartrick, others

EPA: Don Kopinski, Chuck Moulis, others

The discussion focused on HD pickup trucks and van regulations for the HD GHG rule.
#### The Governor for the use of Archibald Campbell, County Trustee *v.*William Barr, et. al.

From Stokes.

The comity tax cannot be recovered of the Sheriff upon the official bond required by the act of *1777.*

Debt upon a bond, conditioned that William Barr should “ well and truly execute, and due return make, of all process, &c. and pay and satisfy alt fees and sums *66of money by him received, &c. and *in all other things well, truly and faithfully execute the office of Sheriff,*&c.” The breach assigned was that *Barr*had not paid over certain County taxes, which “ he liad collected and received by virtue of bis office as Sheriff.1” After oyer, the Defendants plead, *ist. non estfactum.*2d. Conditions performed, and not broken. 3d. That they sealed and delivered their bond for 2000 dollars, to the Chairman of the County Court of Stokes, conditioned that *Barr*should account for the county tax; that judgment had been obtained on the same for the sum of 3024 dollars, of which 1024 dollars, had been remitted, concluding with an averment that the sum so remitted, was the sum now sought to be recovered.

Upon the third plea, his honor Judge Norwood, intimating an opinion in favor of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was called and nonsuited; and a *rule to set*the non-suit aside, and grant a new trial, being discharged, the Defendant appealed.

No Counsel appeared for the Plaintiff in this Court.

The case was submitted by *Murphey*and *Gaston,*for the Defendant.

The opinion oftbe Court was delivered by

Haze, Judge:

The bond on which this suit is brought, certainly cannot he converted by the declaration, into an obligatios upon the Sheriff to pay the County tax. The bond is a proper one, given to the Governor, and conditioned that the Sheriff shall “execute all process,” &c. and “pay and satisfy all fees and sums of money to the persons by law entitled to them but nothing in the bond makes it his duty to collect the County and poor tax. The Defendant states that he gave a bond to the Chairman of the County Court, for that purpose, and that Judgment was obtained against him upon it.

I have no hesitation in saying, that the nonsuit should not he set aside, and that there ought not to be a new trial.

Judgment ateirme»»
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE COUNTY COURT OF HENDERSON COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 8th

day of July, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF

THELMA PAULINE TAYLOR ERWIN, DECEASED

NO. 12-14-00244-CV; Trial Court No. 28-2014

By per curiam opinion.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, 

it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, 

and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be certified to 

the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 18th day of September, 2015.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas L. Monahan III, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of CEB Inc.; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: April 4, 2017

 

| /s/ Thomas L. Monahan III                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Thomas L. Monahan III                                          |
| Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.0

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Period Ended September 30, 2010

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Vermillion, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify,
to the best of such officers knowledge, that:



|1. | The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                             
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Gail S. Page                                                                            
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Gail S. Page Executive
Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 12, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Sandra A. Gardiner                                                                      
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Sandra A. Gardiner Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) 

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.
Order entered March 26, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00039-CV

THE CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V.

THOMAS A. DAVENPORT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-09411-K

ORDER

The Court has before it appellee’s March 21, 2013 unopposed motion for extension of 

time to file his brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that appellee’s brief be 

filed by April 25, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                       
                           MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON
                          AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                  (UNAUDITED)

                                                             Nine months ended
                                                                 October 31,
                                                           ---------------------
                                                              1996        1995
                                                           ---------   ---------

Computation of primary earnings per common share:
Net income ...............................................    $1,618      $1,080
                                                           ---------   ---------

Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding.............................................. 3,999,000   3,170,000

Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrants,
 based on the treasury stock method, using average
 market price.............................................   432,000       -
                                                           ---------   ---------

Common shares outstanding................................. 4,431,000   3,170,000
                                                           ---------   ---------
                                                           ---------   ---------

Earnings per common share ................................     $0.37       $0.34
                                                           ---------   ---------
                                                           ---------   ---------

Computation of earnings per common share
 assuming full dilution:
Net income................................................    $1,618      $1,080
                                                           ---------   ---------

Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding.............................................. 3,999,000   3,170,000

Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
 based on the treasury stock method, using the
 end-of-period market price...............................   490,000       -
                                                           ---------   ---------

Common shares outstanding assuming full
 dilution................................................. 4,489,000   3,170,000
                                                           ---------   ---------
                                                           ---------   ---------
Earnings per common share assuming full
 dilution.................................................     $0.36       $0.34
                                                           ---------   ---------
                                                           ---------   ---------


                                      12
Exhibit 10.2

Promissory Note 1. Names

   Borrower:

        Sierra Norte, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company
        5111 Juan Tabo Blvd. N.E.
        Albuquerque, New Mexico 87122

   Lender:

        Karen Y. Duran
        12512 Modesto Ave. N.E.
        Albuquerque, New Mexico 87122

2.   Promise to Pay

     For value received, Borrower promises to pay Lender $150,000 and interest
     at the yearly rate of 8.5% on the unpaid balance as specified below.


3.   Payment Date

     Borrower will pay the entire amount of principal and interest on or before
     May 25, 2006.


4.   Prepayment

     Borrower may prepay all or any part of the principal without penalty.


5.   Security

     This is an unsecured note.


6.   Collection Costs

     If Lender prevails in a lawsuit to collect on this note, Borrower will pay
     Lender's costs and lawyer's fees in an amount the court finds to be
     reasonable.


7.   Entire Agreement

     This is the entire agreement between the parties. It replaces and
     supersedes any and all oral agreements between the parties, as well as any
     prior writings.


8.   Successors and Assignees

     This agreement binds and benefits the heirs, successors and assignees of
     the parties.


9.   Notices

     All notices must be in writing. A notice may be delivered to a party at the
     address that follows a party's signature or to a new address that a party
     designates in writing.


                          Promissory Note-- Page 1 of 3


<PAGE>



A notice may be delivered:

    o    in person
    o    by certified mail, or
    o    by overnight courier.


10.  Governing Law

     This agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the
     laws of the state of New Mexico.


11.  Waiver

     If one party waives any term or provision of this agreement at any time,
     that waiver will be effective only for the specific instance and specific
     purpose for which the waiver was given. If either party fails to exercise
     or delays exercising any of its rights or remedies under this agreement,
     that party retains the right to enforce that term or provision at a later
     time.


12.  Severability

     If any court determines that any provision of this agreement is invalid or
     unenforceable, any invalidity or unenforceability will affect only that
     provision and will not make any other provision of this agreement invalid
     or unenforceable and such provision shall be modified, amended or limited
     only to the extent necessary to render it valid and enforceable.


13.  Disputes

     If a dispute arises, either party may take the matter to court.



                         Promissory Note -- Page 2 of 3

<PAGE>



BORROWER


Sierra Norte, LLC,
a New Mexico limited liability company
5111 Juan Tabo Blvd. N.E.
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87122


Dated:  May 20, 2005
       --------------------------
By: /s/ Fred M. Montano
    --------------------------------
    Fred M. Montano Managing Member
The following are signs of a medical emergency!

Abnormal thinking or behavior

Slurred speech 

Seizures

Loss of consciousness

Prevent Heat

Illness at Work

Outdoor and indoor heat exposure

can be dangerous.

First Aid for Heat Illness

New and returning workers need to build 

tolerance to heat (acclimatize) and take 

frequent breaks.

Follow the 20% Rule. On the first day, work 

no more than 20% of the shift’s duration at 

full intensity in the heat. Increase the 

duration of time at full intensity by no more 

than 20% a day until workers are used to

working in the heat.

Ways to Protect Yourself and Others

1 CALL 911 IMMEDIATELY

2 COOL THE WORKER RIGHT AWAY WITH WATER OR ICE

3 STAY WITH THE WORKER UNTIL HELP ARRIVES 

?

? ? ?? ?

Ease into Work. Nearly 3 out of 4 fatalities from heat 

illness happen during the first week of work.

Drink Cool Water 

Drink cool water even if you aren’t thirsty — at least 1 cup 

every 20 minutes.

Watch Out for Each Other

Monitor yourself and others for signs of heat illness.

Find Shade or a Cool Area

Take breaks in a designated shady or cool location.

Take Rest Breaks

Take enough time to recover from heat given the 

temperature, humidity, and conditions.

Dress for the Heat

Wear a hat and light-colored, loose-fitting, and breathable 

clothing if possible.

If Wearing a Face Covering 

Change your face covering if it gets wet or soiled. Verbally 

check on others frequently.

Watch for any other signs of heat illness 

and act quickly. When in doubt, call 911.

For more information: 

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov/heat

Federal law entitles you to a safe workplace. You 

have the right to speak up about hazards without 

fear of retaliation. See www.osha.gov/workers for 

information about how to file a confidential 

complaint with OSHA and ask for an inspection.

Take these actions:

Give cool water to drink

Remove unnecessary clothing 

Move to a cooler area

Cool with water, ice, or a fan 

Do not leave alone

Seek medical care

If a worker experiences:

Headache or nausea

Weakness or dizziness

Heavy sweating or hot, dry skin

Elevated body temperature

Thirst

Decreased urine output 

9-1-1

100%

20%

OSHA 4379-10 2023 | Lao
##### 



Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, I, Thomas
E. Legro, Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Indiantown
Cogeneration, L.P., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                                                
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Indiantown
Cogeneration, L.P.

|             |  |                               
|------------ |  | ------------------------------
|May 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Thomas E. Legro           
|             |  | Thomas E. Legro               
|             |  | Vice President, Controller and
|             |  | Chief Accounting Officer      
|             |  | Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Indiantown Cogeneration, L.P. and will be retained by Indiantown
Cogeneration, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request
# Official Journal C 451A/8 No

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 451A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 648 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 451A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 648 November 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 451 A/01 | Secretariat-General – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) – COM/2021/10409 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2021/C 451 A/01

Secretariat-General – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) – COM/2021/10409

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN