alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. Zugibe, as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Kevin J. Zugibe        
|---------------------------
|Kevin J. Zugibe            
|Chief Executive Officer and
|Chairman of the Board      
|                           
|August 12, 2008
# L_2009018EN.01S00301.xml

| 22.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 18/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 18/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         658,689                 658,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 32,410,174              32,410,174
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,911,939               1,911,939
<PP&E>                                       1,229,522               1,229,522
<DEPRECIATION>                               (863,715)               (863,715)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,346,609              35,346,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,758,988              32,758,988
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        56,460                  56,460
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,531,161               2,531,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,346,609              35,346,609
<SALES>                                     13,715,059              40,378,333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,832,841              40,711,770
<CGS>                                       13,227,713              36,979,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,227,713              36,979,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,115,115               5,467,283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,809                  17,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,516,796)             (1,753,251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,516,796)             (1,753,251)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,516,796)             (1,753,251)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)                  (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)                  (0.31)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Gyanendra Patra v. Clare Schoene and Adam E. Hampton 

Appellate case number: 01-22-00277-CV

Trial court case number: 20-DCV-271333

Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, Gyanendra Patra, has filed a “Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Brief.” Appellant requests a thirty-day extension for filing his appellant’s brief “due to his 

counsel’s family death and personal illness.” In his motion, appellant notes that, on May 

11, 2022, appellant was notified by this Court that the time for filing a brief had expired, 

and the appeal was subject to dismissal if a brief wasn’t filed on or before May 23, 2022. 

Appellant argues that “[i]t would be manifestly unfair and unjust” for the appeal to be 

dismissed for want of prosecution “simply due to his counsel’s personal issues.” 

Appellant’s brief was initially due to be filed on October 7, 2021. When no brief 

was timely filed, appellant was first notified by this Court that the appeal was subject to 

dismissal on October 19, 2021. On November 15, 2021, appellant filed a motion for 

extension of time requesting that his deadline for filing a brief be extended “until [thirty] 

days after the full court reporter transcript has been filed” to include the transcript for the 

hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial. The supplemental reporter’s record was filed, 

and appellant’s motion was granted, extending the deadline to file his brief to December 

13, 2021. Again, no brief was filed. 

Accordingly, on December 21, 2021, appellant was again notified that the time for 

filing appellant’s brief had expired, and that his appeal was subject to dismissal for want 

of prosecution. Because appellant failed to respond to the Court’s December 21, 2021 

notice, on May 11, 2022, appellant was notified a third time that his appeal was subject to 

dismissal if he failed to file a brief on or before May 23, 2022. On May 23, 2022, appellant 

filed his motion for extension.

The motion does not include a certificate of conference stating whether appellees, 

Clare Schoene and Adam E. Hampton are opposed to the relief requested in appellant’s 

motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5).
We grant appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief. Appellant’s 

brief must be filed with this Court on or before June 22, 2022, which is 191 days after the 

first extended deadline for appellant to file his brief, December 13, 2021. Accordingly, no 

further extensions will be considered, and the failure to file a brief by June 22, 2022 will 

result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ April Farris______________________________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___June 7, 2022___
Rare Element Resources, Ltd.


Exhibit 4.4




Approved by the Board of Directors on

December 5, 2008 and approved by the Members at

the Annual General Meeting held on December 5, 2008
























ADDENDUM - INCENTIVE SHARE OPTION PLAN













December, 2008

















ADDENDUM TO STOCK OPTION PLAN

THIS ADDENDUM dated effective as of the 5th day of December, 2008

WHEREAS Rare Element Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) amends the number of shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the exercise of stock options in the Stock Option Plan dated December 11, 2002 (the “Plan”) as follows:




1.

Section 1.4 (a) of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and substituted by the following:




“1.4

Shares Reserved

(a)

The maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance for all purposes under the Plan shall not exceed 4,773,347 common shares with vesting provisions for plans that reserve more than 10%.  

The maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one person in a 12 month period under the Plan shall be 5% of the Common Shares outstanding at the time of the grant (on a non-diluted basis) less the aggregate number of Common Shares reserved for issuance to such person under any other option to purchase Common Shares from treasury granted as a compensation or incentive mechanism.  

The number of options granted to any one Consultant or to any persons employed to provide investor relations activities in a 12 month period must not exceed 2% of the issued Common Shares of the Corporation, calculated at the date the option was granted.”

2.

All of the capitalized terms not defined herein shall bear the meaning assigned thereto in the Plan.
DATOS

RÁPIDOS

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)

Para más información:

Administración de

Seguridad y Salud

Ocupacional

Protéjase

Seguridad de

Generadores Portátiles

Generadores portátiles son usados con un motor de combustion interna para generar electricidad y están comunmente usados durante respuesta a desastres. Generadores

portátiles pueden ser peligrosos si se usan incorrectamente.

Causas Mayores de Peligros y Fatalidades

• Descarga eléctrica o electrocusion por el uso incorrecto

de la energía o energizar accidentalmente otros sistemas

eléctricos.

• Monóxido de carbono por el tubo de escape del generador.

• Fuego por la forma inadecuada de poner combustible

al generador o la manera inapropiada de almacenar el

combustible.

Prácticas deTrabajo Seguras

• Inspeccione los generadores portátiles por daño o

perdida de combustible en la linea que pudo haber sido

occurrido durante la transportación y/o manejo.

• Conserve el generador seco.

• Mantenga y opere el generador portátil de acuerdo con las

instrucciones sobre el uso y la seguridad del fabricante.

• Nunca conecte el generador directamente al sistema

eléctrico de la estructura (casa, oficina, o remolque) a

menos que el generador tenga instalado una dispositivo

de transferencia debido a que esto crea un peligro de

electrocución para los trabajadores de servicios.

• Siempre enchufe los dispositivos eléctricos directamente

al generador usando el cable suplido por el fabricante.

Use cables de extension de uso pesado que estén en

perfecto estado que están conenctado a tierra (enchufe

de 3 terminales)

• Use un interruptor de circuito con perdida a tierra según

la instrucciones del fabricante.

• Antes de echar gasolina nuevamente, apague el generador. Nunca almacene gasolina en el interior.

Envenenamiento con Monóxido de Carbono

Monóxido de carbono es un gas tóxico que es incoloro y

inoloro. Muchas trabajadores han muerto de envenenamiento de CO debido a que los generadores no estabán

ventialados adecuadamente.

• Nunca use un generador en la parte interior.

• Nunca coloque el generador afuera cerca de puerta,

ventanas o ventiladores.

• Si usted o otros muestran síntomas de envenenamiento por

CO - mareos, dolores de cabeza, nausea, cansancio -

obtenga aire fresco inmediatamente y busque atención

médica.

Departamento de Trabajo

de os EE UU
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40464

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID FRANKLIN BECK, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:15-CR-4-2

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent David Franklin Beck, Jr., has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Beck has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed 

to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Beck’s claims of ineffective assistance 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40464 Document: 00514902572 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/04/2019
No. 18-40464

2

of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Beck’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Beck’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

 Case: 18-40464 Document: 00514902572 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/04/2019
Exhibit 24(a)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each of the undersigned directors of Energen Corporation, an Alabama
corporation, hereby nominates, constitutes and appoints James T. McManus, II, and Charles W. Porter, Jr., and each of them, the true and lawful attorneys of the undersigned to sign the name of the undersigned as director to the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of said corporation to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to any and all amendments to said report.

The undersigned hereby grants to said attorneys full power of substitution, resubstitution and revocation, all as fully as the
undersigned could do if personally present, hereby ratifying all that said attorneys or their substitutes may lawfully do by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned directors of Energen Corporation have executed
this Power of Attorney as of the 28thday of January, 2009.



/s/ Stephen D. Ban/s/ Julian W. Banton/s/ Kenneth W. Dewey/s/ James S. M. French/s/ T. Michael Goodrich/s/ Judy M. Merritt/s/ Stephen A. Snider/s/ Wm. Michael Warren, Jr./s/ David W. Wilson/s/ Gary C. Youngblood
Exhibit 32.0

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as Amended by the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A,

for the Period Ended March 31, 2010

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Vermillion, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge, that:



|1. | The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, (the Form 10-Q), as amended by the quarterly report on Form
10-Q/A filed on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Information contained in the Form 10-Q, as amended by the Form 10-Q/A, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 28, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Gail S. Page                                                                                       
|                   |  |  |  | Gail S. Page
Executive Chairperson, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 28, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ John H. Tran                                                                                       
|                   |  |  |  | John H. Tran Vice
President of Finance and Chief Account Officer (Principal Financial Officer)         

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q, as amended by the Form 10-Q/A, or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        DIGITAL DESCRIPTOR SYSTEMS, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Descriptor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
Shupin,  Chairman,  President,  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  of the  Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Digital  Descriptor  Systems,  Inc.  and will be retained by Digital
Descriptor Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

Date:  May 23, 2005


/s/ Anthony Shupin
------------------
Anthony Shupin
President and Chief Executive Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 65

To apply the rates of duty effective after December 31, 1994, to certain

water resistant wool trousers that were entered, or withdrawn from

warehouse for consumption, after December 31, 1988, and before January 1, 1995.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To apply the rates of duty effective after December 31,

1994, to certain water resistant wool trousers that were

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption,

after December 31, 1988, and before January 1, 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN

4 ENTRIES.

5 Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of

6 1930 or any other provision of law, upon proper request

7 filed with the Customs Service within 180 days after the
2

•S 65 IS

1 date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal

2 from warehouse for consumption—

3 (1) that was made after December 31, 1988,

4 and before January 1, 1995, and

5 (2) that, if it had been made on January 1,

6 1995—

7 (A) would have been claimed under sub8 heading 6203.41.05 or 6204.61.10 of the Har9 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States,

10 and

11 (B) would have had a lower duty,

12 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such entry or with13 drawal had been made on January 1, 1995.

Æ
#### J. M. HARDIN v. JESSE RAY and others.

*Judge of Superior Court, power of*— Judgment *rendered, after adjournment of Court.*

A judge has no power to render judgment after the expiration of the term of court without the consent of parties, except in cases where the law clothes him with jurisdiction at chambers.

EjectmeNT tried on exceptions to a referee’s report at Spring Term, 1882, of Ashe Superior Court, before Avery, *J.*

Appeal by defendants.

*Mr. D. M. Fur ches,*for the plaintiff.

*Messrs. J. W. Todd*and *Q. F. Neal,*for defendant.

Asi-ie, J.

The main question presented by the record for our consideration is whether a judge, after the adjournment of court, can render a judgment in a case tried before him at court-, without the consent of the parties, it not being a case of which he was by law clothed with jurisdiction at chambers.

This cause was referred to a referee, who filed a report at fall term, 1881. Upon hearing the report of the referee, the cxcep-*365tions thereto, and the argument of counsel, the court overruled the exceptions; and it appearing that a deed executed by the defendant to the plaintiff, under which he claimed title to the land, though absolute on its face, was admitted to have been intended to secure the payment of a sum of money, and the referee having found that a portion of the debt was still unpaid, the court held that the plaintiff was entitled to a writ of possession, and that the defendant Ray would be entitled to a recon-veyance upon the payment by him of the unpaid residue-of the debt mentioned in the referee’s report.

The court announced before the adjournment, that it would be presumed that no objection would be taken to the signing of decrees and orders after the expiration of the term, and that counsel would be expected to submit orders and decrees, as drawn, to counsel appearing on the other side before asking the signature of the judge.

A judgment in favor of the plaintiff, embodying many points not decided by the court, was signed without examination by His Honor, after the expiration of the term and without having been submitted to the counsel for the defendant before the “signing.”

The defendants excepted to the judgment, and in the statement of the case on appeal by His Honor, it is stated that the defendants’ right to except to the judgment is conceded.

The judgment cannot be allowed to stand. It is reversed and a new trial ordered. Let this be certified to the superior court of Ashe county.

Error. *Venire de novo.*