alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 419 

Congratulating the University of North Dakota men’s hockey team for winning the 2016 National Collegiate Athletic Association division I men’s 

hockey championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 13, 2016 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself and Ms. HEITKAMP) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the University of North Dakota men’s hockey 

team for winning the 2016 National Collegiate Athletic 

Association division I men’s hockey championship. 

Whereas the University of North Dakota (referred to in this 

preamble as ‘‘UND’’) men’s hockey team won the 2016 

National Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in 

this preamble as the ‘‘NCAA’’) division I men’s hockey 

championship game in Tampa Bay, Florida, on April 9, 

2016, in a hard-fought victory over the Quinnipiac University Bobcats of Connecticut by a score of 5 to 1; 

Whereas the UND men’s hockey team had an incredible 

2015–16 season, during which Coach Brad Berry became 

the first head coach to win an NCAA division I men’s 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 419 ATS 

hockey national championship in an individual’s first season as head coach; 

Whereas the UND men’s hockey team won its eighth NCAA 

division I men’s hockey championship and ended the 

2015–16 season with a 34–6–4 record; 

Whereas Coach Brad Berry and the coaching staff have instilled character and perseverance in the UND men’s 

hockey team players and have done an outstanding job 

coaching the UND men’s hockey program; 

Whereas under the leadership of Interim President Ed 

Schafer and Athletic Director Brian Faison, academic 

and athletic excellence has been promoted at UND; 

Whereas thousands of UND fans attended the NCAA division 

I men’s hockey championship game, reflecting the tremendous fan base of UND, which showcases the spirit 

and dedication of UND hockey fans and has helped to 

propel the success of the UND men’s hockey team; and 

Whereas the UND men’s hockey team’s victory in the 2016 

NCAA division I men’s hockey championship was also a 

victory for the entire State of North Dakota: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the University of North Da3 kota men’s hockey team, the 2016 National Colle4 giate Athletic Association division I men’s hockey 

5 champions; 

6 (2) commends the players, coaches, and staff of 

7 the University of North Dakota men’s hockey team 

8 for their hard work and dedication; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 419 ATS 

1 (3) recognizes the students, alumni, and loyal 

2 fans for supporting the University of North Dakota 

3 men’s hockey team on a successful quest to capture 

4 another National Collegiate Athletic Association divi5 sion I men’s hockey championship trophy for the 

6 University of North Dakota. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30,2005 of Alliance Gaming Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Richard M. Haddrill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| Dated: December 29, 2005 |     |
|-------------------------------|----------|
| /s/ RICHARD M. HADDRILL       |     |
| Richard M. Haddrill           |     |
| *Chief Executive Officer*     | * * |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01695**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 01695\01695_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01695\01695_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 01695\01695_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 01695\01695_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01695\01695_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01695\01695_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01695\01695_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01695\01695_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01695\01695_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01695\01695_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01695\01695_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01695\Certification Statement Plant ID 01695.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 01695\Supplemental Documents\01695_Diagram 1 Craig 1695 Dry Bottom Ash System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01695\Supplemental Documents\01695_Diagram 3 Craig 1695 GW wells near SPD-7.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01695\Supplemental Documents\01695_Diagram 4 Craig 1695 GW wells near SPD-8.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01695\Supplemental Documents\01695_Diagram 5 Craig 1695 GW wells near RET-LANDFILL-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01695\Supplemental Documents\01695_Map 1 and 2 Aerial Maps of Craig.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01695\Supplemental Documents\01695_Part C_ref.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01695\Supplemental Documents\01695_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01695\Supplemental Documents\01695_WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01695\Supplemental Documents\CBI Substantiation\Tri-State Generation_EIP FOIA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01695\Supplemental Documents\Diagram 2 Craig 1695 Dry Bottom Ash System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### William Exum v. The heirs of Benjamin Sheppard.

From Craven.

Judgment being given for an administrator, upon the plea of “ fully administered,” a scire faoias issued to the heir, to shew cause why judgment of execution should not be had .against the real estate descended. The heir pleaded *“*nothing by descent,” and after-wards, pending the. suit, he pleaded, *“*that since the last continuance, the lands had been sold to satisfy other executions.” The Plaintiff demurred: and the demurrer was sustained.

The Plaintiff recovered against James Glasgow and Martha Jones Sheppard, administrators of the estate of Benjamin Sheppard, deceased, in the County Court of Greene, in an action of covenant, *£*for damages and *£*costs of *suit;*but the plea of “ fully administered’* was found for the Defendants. The Plaintiff then sued out a writ of *scire facias*agaiiu,; the Defendants, suggesting that the. said Benjamin Sheppard died seised of a large real estate, which descended upon the Defendants, as heirs at Law, m<! praying for execution of the said damages and costs against the real estate to them descended. Upon the return of tins writ, the Defendants appeared and pleaded several pleas, amongst which were, *“*no' such record, and nothing by descentand issues being joined upon said pleas, they were all found for the Plaintiff. The Defendants being dissatisfied with the verdict, appealed to the Superior Court for Newbern District. The transcript of the record was filed by the Defendants in due time, and the case stood upon the docket of the Superior Court, for trial upon the issues joined in the County Court, until January term, 1804, when the Defendant’s counsel, as of course, and without motion to the Court, pleaded, “that since the last continuance, the lands have been sold to satisfy other executions issued from this Courtto which plea the Plaintiff demurred, and the Defendants joined in demurrer. *87At July term, tl;o issues joined between ibe parties in the County Court, were tried and (bund for the Plaintiff: and the issue in Law joined between the parties, was sent to this Court. And '

By Tire Court.

Let the demurrer be sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 24280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10054]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Public Availability of Department of Labor FY 2014 Service 
Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and 
Management, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of public availability of FY 2014 Service Contract 
Inventories.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the 
Department of Labor (DOL) is publishing this notice to advise the 
public of the availability of its FY 2014 Service Contract Inventory. 
This inventory provides information on service contract actions over 
$25,000 made in FY 2014. The information is organized by function to 
show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. 
The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on 
November 5, 2010, by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of 
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf. The Department of 
Labor has posted its inventory and a summary of the inventory on the 
agency's Web site at the following link: http://www.dol.gov/dol/aboutdol/main.htm#inventory.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Ngozi Ofili in the DOL/Office 
of Acquisition Management Services at (202) 693-7247 or 
ofili.ngozi.e@dol.gov.

    Dated: April 17, 2015.
Edward C. Hugler,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management.
[FR Doc. 2015-10054 Filed 4-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-23-P
```
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant, 

v.	 OSHRC Docket No. 10-1021 

C.P. BUCKNER STEEL ERECTION, INC., 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE 

The Commission requests that the parties brief the following issues. 

(1)	 With respect to Items 1 through 3, which allege violations of 29 C.F.R. 

§ 1904.32(b)(4), did the judge err in determining that Respondent failed to 

comply with the requirements of this provision? 

(2)	 If Respondent did violate § 1904.32(b)(4) as alleged in Items 1 through 3: 

a.	 Did the judge err in concluding that Respondent had waived its argument that 

the phrase “highest ranking company official” as used in § 1904.32(b)(4)(iii) 

is vague and, if so, does this argument have merit? 

b.	 Did the judge err in determining that the violations alleged in Items 1 and 2 

fell within the six-month limitations period under section 9(c) of the 

Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. § 658(c)? 

c.	 Did the judge err in characterizing the violations as other-than-serious rather 

than de minimis? 

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing 

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of 

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: October 20, 2010 _/s/_______________________________ 

Ray H. Darling, Jr. 

Executive Secretary 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate. 

2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         The following is a list of all subsidiary corporations of the
registrant. All subsidiaries are wholly-owned by the Company, except that
Buckley Mining Corporation and Plastics Universal Corporation are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Ada Mining Corporation. The Company's consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries.

                                                                State of
             Subsidiary                                      Incorporation
             ----------                                      -------------

         Adams Resources Exploration Corporation               Delaware
         Kirbyville Marketing Co., Inc.                        Texas
         Service Transport Company                             Texas
         Bayou City Barge Lines, Inc.                          Texas
         Ada Crude Oil Company                                 Texas
         Ada Mining Corporation                                Texas
         Classic Coal Corporation                              Delaware
         Plastics Universal Corporation                        Kentucky
         CJC Leasing, Inc.                                     Kentucky
         Buckley Mining Corporation                            Kentucky
         GulfMark Energy, Inc.                                 Texas
         Ada Resources, Inc.                                   Texas

         In addition, Adams Resources Exploration Corporation ("Ada Exco") owns
certain general partner and special limited partner interest in six oil and gas
exploration and income partnerships which were organized under the partnership
laws of the State of Texas. Ada Exco's equity in the partnerships' earnings or
losses is included in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
# Official Journal L 372/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 372 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5730 December 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 372

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5730 December 2014

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 1383/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 55/2008 introducing autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 1384/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2014 on the tariff treatment for goods originating in Ecuador | 5 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 1383/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 55/2008 introducing autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova

1

*

Regulation (EU) No 1384/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2014 on the tariff treatment for goods originating in Ecuador

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.



|                                        |  |                             |          | 
|--------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | -------- | 
|Name                                    |  | Jurisdictionof Organization |         
|AmerInst Mezco, Ltd.                    |  |                             | Bermuda  | 
|AmerInst Professional Services, Limited |  |                             | Delaware | 
|AmerInst Insurance Company, Ltd.        |  |                             | Bermuda  | 
|AmerInst Investment Company, Ltd.       |  |                             | Bermuda  | 
|AmerInst Holdings, Ltd. (Inactive)      |  |                             | Bermuda  |
# ***Exhibit 32.1***

# *** ***

# ***CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER***

**PURSUANTTO SECITON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, being the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of AmeriVest Properties Inc., a Maryland real estate investment trust(the “Issuer”), hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q(the “Quarterly Report”) of the Issuer for the three months ended March 31,2006, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. §78 m(a)) and that the information contained in the Quarterly Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Issuer.

 

May 10, 2006

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Charles  K. Knight   |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Charles K.  Knight       |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32(a)

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification

 

I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-Q of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m            or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp.

 

 

 

| Date: August 7, 2009                  |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                  |   |   |
| By:  /s/ Mary B. Halsey          |   |   |
| Mary B. Halsey                        |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----

Exhibit 32(b)

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification

 

I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-Q of Cecil Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m            or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp.

 

 

| Date: August 7, 2009                       |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                       |   |   |
| By:  /s/ Robert Lee Whitehead         |   |   |
| Robert Lee Whitehead                       |   |   |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)              |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1094 

CA 11-00362 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF 

ROCHESTER FOR AN “INSPECTION WARRANT” TO INSPECT 

449-451 CEDARWOOD TERRACE, CITY OF ROCHESTER, 

COUNTY OF MONROE, STATE OF NEW YORK. 

------------------------------------------------ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 

JILL CERMAK AND BRUCE HENRY, APPELLANTS, 

 

V

CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

DAVIDSON FINK LLP, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL A. BURGER OF COUNSEL), FOR

APPELLANTS. 

JEFFREY EICHNER, ACTING CORPORATION COUNSEL, ROCHESTER (IGOR SHUKOFF

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

DIBBLE & MILLER, P.C., ROCHESTER (CRAIG D. CHARTIER OF COUNSEL), FOR

NEW YORK STATE COALITION OF PROPERTY OWNERS & BUSINESSES, INC., AMICUS

CURIAE. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas

A. Stander, J.), entered February 18, 2011. The order authorized the

inspection of certain real property. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of City of Rochester (Cermak)

([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 23, 2011]).

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court