alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    349,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               349,554
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     342,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   349,554
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (741)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 165 (Tuesday, October 14, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10515]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Byrd).
  The assistant legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                 Washington, DC, October 14, 2008.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the 
     Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable 
     Mary L. Landrieu, a Senator from the State of Louisiana, to 
     perform the duties of the Chair.
                                                   Robert C. Byrd,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Ms. LANDRIEU thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant, 

 v. 

CSA EQUIPMENT COMPANY, LLC,

Respondent. 

OSHRC Docket No. 12-1287 

BRIEFING NOTICE

 

The Commission requests that the parties brief all issues raised in Respondent’s Petition 

for Discretionary Review; in particular, the parties are asked to address: 

1. Whether Respondent’s new coil unloading system as implemented is the same abatement 

method proposed by the Secretary in the Citation. Specifically, the parties are asked to 

discuss whether the new unloading system as implemented “establish[ed] a safe area that 

was separate from the forklift operating areas where the [coil] checker/clerk employees 

could perform their duties free from forklift struck-by hazards.”

2. Whether the Secretary proved that Respondent’s new coil unloading system, as 

implemented, materially reduced or eliminated the cited hazard and did not create 

additional hazards. Specifically, did the Secretary prove that the coil checker/clerk 

employees are not now subject to new hazards from other vehicles, even assuming a 

reduced or eliminated hazard from the forklifts that retrieve the coils? 

In lieu of filing briefs directly with the Commission, the parties may, if they choose, rely 

upon their briefs on remand that were filed with the administrative law judge. See Commission 

Rule 93(a). If the parties intend to do so, they must advise the Commission accordingly within 

thirty (30) days.

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 
All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1

 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of 

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service. 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: February 9, 2015 /s/ 

John X. Cerveny

Executive Secretary

1

 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.

2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Lodgian, Inc., (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David E. Hawthorne,
the Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and after reasonable inquiry:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.





                                         LODGIAN, INC.

         March 31, 2003           By:      /s/  DAVID E. HAWTHORNE
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                                DAVID E. HAWTHORNE
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
Filed 10/4/13 P. v. Velazquez CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JONATHAN VE LAZQUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant. B244005

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. NA081703)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

Mark C. Kim, Judge. Affirmed.

Gideon Margolis, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant

and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant Jonathan Velazquez appeals from the judgment entered upon

remand to the trial court following his prior appeal in People v. Velazquez (2011)2

201 Cal.A pp.4th 219. In that appeal, we reversed convictions on four counts not

here relevant, affirmed the convictions on one count of criminal threats with a gang

enhancement (Pen. Code, §§ 422 & 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(B)) 1 and one count of

dissuading a witness wi th a gang enhancement (§§ 136.1, subd. (b)(2) & 186.22,

subd. (b)(4)), and remanded for resentencing. On remand, the trial court sentenced

defendant to seven years to life on the dissuading a witness count, and eight years

on the criminal threats count, w hich was stayed pursuant to section 654. Later, in a

modified judgment, the court corrected defendant’s credit to award 288 days actual

credit, and 43 days good time/work time, for a total of 331 days. The facts

underlying the charges are set forth in ou r prior opinion and are not necessary to

repeat in this appeal.

Defendant’s court appointed attorney filed a brief pursuant to People v.

Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, requesting that we review the record. On April 12,

2013, we notified defendant that he ha d 30 days within which to file a

supplemental brief. No supplemental brief was filed.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that no arguable issues

exist, and that appellant has, by virtue of counsel’s compliance with the Wende

procedure and our review of the record, received adequate and effective appellate

review of the judgment entered against him in this case. ( Smith v. Robbins (2000)

528 U.S. 259, 278; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 112

- 113.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

1 All undesignated section references are to the Penal Code.3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

WILLHITE, J.

We concur:

EPSTEIN, P. J.

MANELLA, J.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

# ***CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER***

**PURSUANT TO SECITON 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, beingthe Chief Financial Officer of AmeriVest Properties Inc., a Maryland realestate investment trust (the “Issuer”), hereby certifies that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report”) of the Issuer for the three monthsended March 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. §78 m(a)) and that the information contained in the Quarterly Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Issuer.

 

May 9, 2005
|   | By:    | /s/  Kathryn L. Hale          |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |   |  Kathryn L.  Hale        |
|   |   |  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 487 

Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Reserve Officers’ Training 

Corps program of the Army. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2016 

Mrs. ERNST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Reserve 

Officers’ Training Corps program of the Army. 

Whereas June 3, 2016, marks the 100th anniversary of the 

Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program of the Army 

(referred to in this preamble as ‘‘Army ROTC’’); 

Whereas Congress established Army ROTC and the Naval 

Reserve Officer Training Corps in the Act of June 3, 

1916 (39 Stat. 166, chapter 134) (commonly known as 

the ‘‘National Defense Act of 1916’’); 

Whereas the Army has commissioned more than 650,000 officers from Army ROTC; 

Whereas Army ROTC serves as a critical component for the 

training of men and women to take command, protecting 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 487 ATS 

the national security of the United States and way of life 

of individuals in the United States; 

Whereas Army ROTC produces the next generation of innovative and adaptive leaders while providing those leaders 

with essential collegiate educational opportunities; 

Whereas Army ROTC commissioned 5,536 officers in 2014; 

Whereas Army ROTC produced 21 4-star generals between 

2000 and 2016; 

Whereas Army ROTC is available at nearly 1,000 institutions 

of higher education across all 50 States and all territories; 

Whereas the Army has included in Army ROTC programs 

such as the Green to Gold and Simultaneous Membership 

programs to allow an enlisted member of the Army to 

gain a college education and become an officer of the 

Army; 

Whereas women have been an integral part of Army ROTC 

since academic year 1972–1973; and 

Whereas Army ROTC serves as a way for an individual to 

gain a college education and serve the United States: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps pro3 gram of the Army (referred to in this resolving 

4 clause as ‘‘Army ROTC’’) continues to train the 

5 next generation of military leaders, who are well6 equipped to defeat existing enemies of the United 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 487 ATS 

1 States and those enemies that may emerge in the fu2 ture; 

3 (2) the Senate is encouraged by the quality of 

4 leaders that Army ROTC has and will continue to 

5 produce; and 

6 (3) as of the date of adoption of this resolution, 

7 Army ROTC produces more Army officers than any 

8 other source. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26306]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 565 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-192, K2025-190.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26306 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 172 (Thursday, November 6, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10529]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Byrd).
  The assistant legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                 Washington, DC, November 6, 2008.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of Rule I, Section 3, of the Standing 
     Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable Benjamin 
     L. Cardin, a Senator from the State of Maryland, to perform 
     the duties of the Chair.
                                                   Robert C. Byrd,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. CARDIN thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2225]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 INTRODUCTION OF THE IMMIGRATION OVERSIGHT AND FAIRNESS ACT, H.R. 7255

                                 ______
                                 

                       HON. LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, October 3, 2008

  Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD. Madam Speaker, on any given day, roughly 30,000 
immigration detainees are held in a mix of federal, state, local and 
private detention facilities. Explosive growth in the number of non-
citizens in immigration detention across the country has resulted in 
sometimes shameful conditions of confinement and repeated incidents of 
detainee abuse.
  Although federal immigration authorities adopted detention standards 
in 1998 and 2000, you wouldn't know it today. These non-binding 
standards, which cover access to medical care, the separation of 
violent and non-violent suspects, and access to a lawyer, have not been 
enforced.
  It is long past time that Congress make the federal government abide 
by its own detention standards. That is why today I am introducing the 
Immigration Oversight and Fairness Act of 2008.
  The bill establishes long-overdue legally binding detention standards 
for all immigration detention facilities.
  The Immigration Oversight and Fairness Act also establishes legally 
binding standards for Customs and Border Patrol stations which, though 
not technically detention facilities, house immigrants for a few hours 
or a few days before their transfer to immigration authorities.
  Finally, the Immigration Oversight and Fairness Act treats those 
detainees who a judge determines are not a flight risk or a threat to 
society in a more humane and rational way. Under this bill, these 
individuals would be placed in a proven program of supervised release 
instead of in a detention facility where the federal government must 
expend enormous resources to feed, house and watch over them.
  Madam Speaker, I look forward to the House considering these critical 
reforms of the immigration detention system in the next Congress.

                          ____________________
```
1

Filed 10 / 5/ 16 P. v. Peters CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

REGGIE PETERS

,

Defendant and Appellant. A 14 8121

( Alameda County

Super. Ct. No. 160205 )

Appellant Reggie Peters appeals from the denial of a petition for writ of error

coram nobis. Appellant’s counsel has filed an opening brief in which no issues are

raised

, and asks this court for an independent revie w of the record as required by People

v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Counsel has declared that appellant has been notified

that no issues were being raised by counsel on appeal

, and that an independent review

under Wende instead was being requested. Appe llant was also advised of h is right

personally to file a supplemental brief raising any issues he chooses to bring to this

court’s attention

. No supplemental brief has been filed by appellant personally.

While the denial of appellant’s petition is appeal able ( People v. Gallardo (2000)

77 Cal.App.4th 971, 982), the Wende procedure is not available in an appeal from a

postjudgment petition. ( People v. Serrano (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 496, 501, rev.

denied.)

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.2 _________________________ RUVOLO, P. J.

We concur:

_________________________ REARDON, J.

_________________________ RIVERA, J.

A148121, People v. Peters
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              87
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,111
<INVENTORY>                                      4,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,887
<PP&E>                                         130,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,855
<BONDS>                                         25,432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,926
<SALES>                                         13,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,709
<CGS>                                           10,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,111
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,060)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,314)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,399)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,399)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.90)

</TABLE>