alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                          32,862
<SECURITIES>                                     1,420
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,556
<PP&E>                                          10,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,104
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           150
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,682
<SALES>                                        122,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,826
<CGS>                                           69,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,477
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,640
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,302
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,302
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78
        

</TABLE>
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 337 

Expressing support for the designation of February 12, 2016, as ‘‘Darwin 

Day’’ and recognizing the importance of science in the betterment of 

humanity. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17, 2015 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of February 12, 

2016, as ‘‘Darwin Day’’ and recognizing the importance 

of science in the betterment of humanity. 

Whereas Charles Darwin developed the theory of evolution by 

the mechanism of natural selection, which, together with 

the monumental amount of scientific evidence Charles 

Darwin compiled to support the theory, provides humanity with a logical and intellectually compelling explanation 

for the diversity of life on Earth; 

Whereas the validity of the theory of evolution by natural selection developed by Charles Darwin is further strongly 

supported by the modern understanding of the science of 

genetics; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 337 IS 

Whereas it has been the human curiosity and ingenuity exemplified by Charles Darwin that has promoted new scientific discoveries that have helped humanity solve many 

problems and improve living conditions; 

Whereas the advancement of science must be protected from 

those unconcerned with the adverse impacts of global 

warming and climate change; 

Whereas the teaching of creationism in some public schools 

compromises the scientific and academic integrity of the 

education systems of the United States; 

Whereas Charles Darwin is a worthy symbol of scientific advancement on which to focus and around which to build 

a global celebration of science and humanity intended to 

promote a common bond among all the people of the 

Earth; and 

Whereas February 12, 2016, is the anniversary of the birth 

of Charles Darwin in 1809 and would be an appropriate 

date to designate as ‘‘Darwin Day’’: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Darwin Day’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) recognizes Charles Darwin as a worthy sym5 bol on which to celebrate the achievements of reason, 

6 science, and the advancement of human knowledge. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### ISHAM A. DUMAS *v.*ROBERT POWELL, Adm’r of SAUNDERS MEREDITH.

^le owner °f a single bill or bond for the payment of money destroyed by accident, may in equity recover the principal and interest due on it, upon tendering bond and security to the defendant to indemnify'him against any liability that may afterwards arise concerning the said obligation.

The bill stated that Saunders Meredith,' in consideration of goods, wares and merchandise, sold and delivered to him, executed to the plaintiff’ a single bill for the sum of $189-^, on the 25th of May, 1827, and payable one day after date ; and that the obligation had been since destroyed by accident. The prayer was for a discovery, and also for relief in the payment of the amount of the *obligation with the*interest accrued thereon. To his bill the plaintiff annexed an affidavit of the truth of the facts set forth in it.

The answer of the administrator of Meredith, admitted nothing, and put the plaintiff upon full proof of his pase ; nor did it admit or deny assets to satisfy a decree if the plaintiff should obtain one.

No counsel appeared for either party in this Court.

Danibi,, Judge,

after stating the case as above, proceeded as follows : We have examined the evidence, and the proofs are sufficient to satisfy us that the defendant’s intestate did execute to the plaintiff, the obligation mentioned in the bill, for the consideration therein stated, and for the sum of $189-5^0-, payable one day after date, and dated the 25th of May, 1827. There is no proof that the said obligation has ever been paid. The plaintiff has appended to his bill an affidavit that the debt is unpaid, and that the obligation has been destroyed by accident, and there is strong corroborating proof of the truth of this affidavit. We are of opinion that he is entitled to a decree for f 189-^0-, principal money and interest on the same, to be computed from the 26th day of May, 1827, on tendering to the defendant a bond with security to indemnify the estate of his intestate against any liability which may hereafter arise concerning the said supposed lost bond. But before the decree can be render*123ed, there must be an inquiry and report as to the amount of assets in the hands of the defendant, unless he waive such inquiry.

When the answer of an administrator neither admits nor denies assets, there must be an inquiry jj”1tt/rifert amount of assets in the defend-?nl f less SoTM‘ waive such beüoreíhe a decree,

Per Curiam. Direct accordingly.
ex_10-1.htm






Ruby Tuesday, Inc.


Executive Compensation Clawback Policy


July 22, 2010




In the event of a restatement of Ruby Tuesday, Inc.’s (the “Company”) financial results (other than a prophylactic or voluntary restatement due to a change in applicable accounting rules or interpretations) due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements, with respect to any compensation granted (whether already paid or only calculated as payable and yet to be paid) to any current or former employee holding a position of vice president or above (each an “Executive”) after July 22, 2010, if the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company determines in good faith that such compensation was awarded (or in the case of unpaid compensation, determined for award) based on such material noncompliance, then the Board or a committee thereof comprised of independent Board members shall be entitled on behalf of the Company to recover all of the Executive’s compensation (or in the case of unpaid compensation, to reduce such compensation) based on the erroneous financial data in excess of what would have been paid (or in the case of unpaid compensation, what should be paid) to the Executive under the accounting restatement.  Such recovery period shall comprise up to the three (3) years preceding the date on which the Company is required to prepare the accounting restatement.




 


In determining whether to seek recovery of compensation, the Board or applicable committee thereof may take into account any considerations it deems appropriate, including whether the assertion of a claim may violate applicable law or adversely impact the interests of the Company in any related proceeding or investigation, the extent to which the Executive was responsible for the error that resulted in the restatement, and the cost and likely outcome of any potential litigation in connection with the Company’s attempts to recoup compensation. The Board or committee shall have sole discretion in determining whether an Executive’s conduct met or did not meet any particular standard of conduct under law or this policy.
AMERCO and Consolidated Subsidiaries

     Exhibit 12.  Statement Re: Computation of Ratios

                                                            Year end
                                          -------------------------------------
                                           2000    1999    1998    1997    1996
                                          -------------------------------------
Pretax earnings from operations         $ 102.7    97.6    76.3    83.5    96.2
Plus:  Interest expense                    81.5    73.7    79.4    76.0    67.6
       Preferred stock dividends           13.6    17.4    20.8    16.9    13.0
       Amortization of debt expense
         and discounts                      0.5     0.3     0.3     0.1       -
       A portion of rental expense
         (1/3)                             45.3    39.6    30.0    28.6    23.0
                                          -------------------------------------

     Subtotal (A)                         243.6   228.6   206.8   205.1   199.8
                                          -------------------------------------


Divided by:


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                         81.5    73.7    79.4    76.0    67.6
  Preferred stock dividends                13.6    17.4    20.8    16.9    13.0
  A portion of rental expense (1/3)        45.3    39.6    30.0    28.6    23.0
  Interest capitalized during the
    period                                  1.4     0.9     2.2     3.4     1.8
  Amortization of debt expense
    and discounts                           0.5     0.3     0.3     0.1       -
                                          -------------------------------------

     Subtotal (B)                       $ 142.3   131.9   132.7   125.0   105.4
                                          -------------------------------------

     Ratio of earnings to fixed
       charges (A)/(B)                      1.71    1.73    1.56    1.64   1.90
                                          =====================================

     AMERCO believes that one-third of AMERCO's annual rental expense is a
reasonable approximation of the interest factor of such rentals.
#### GEORGE TURNER, Adm’r, v. J. D. QUINN, Adm’r.

*Appeal Bond.*

An appeal bond is of no effect unless it be accompanied by the affidavit of one of the sureties that he is worth *double*the amount specified therein. The Code, § 560. •

*{Lytle*v. *Lytle,*90 N. O., 647; *Bryson*v. Lucas, 85 N. C., 897, cited and approved.)

Civil Action tried at Fall Term, 1884, of Jones Superior Court, before *Shepherd, J.*

The defendant appealed, and upon call of the case in this court the plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated in the opinion here.

*Mr. S. W. Isler,*for plaintiff. .

*Messrs. Faircloth & Allen,*for defendant.

Ashe, J.

The appeal bond sent up with the record to this court is justified as follows; “ Personally appeared heme R. C. Broadhurst who, being duly sworn, says he is worth the amount of the above bond over and above his homestead and personal property exemption and personal liabilities.”

In this court there was a motion by the appellee to dis*93miss the appeal, because the appeal bond was not justified according to law, in that, neither the surety nor principal thereto stated upon oath that he was worth double the amount of the said bond over and above his exemptions and liabilities, &c.

. The statute is peremptory, that an undertaking upon appeal shall be of no affect unless it be accompanied by the affidavit of one of the sureties that he is worth double the amount specified therein. The Code, § 560. Theobjection is well taken. *Lytle*v. *Lytle,*90 N. C., 647 ; *Bryson*v. *Lucas*85 N. C., 397.

The motion of the appellee must be allowed and the appeal dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 184 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10838]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ORDERS FOR WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2008

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that when the Senate 
completes its business today, it stand adjourned until 10:30 a.m., on 
Wednesday, December 10; that following the prayer and pledge, the 
Journal of proceedings be approved to date, the morning hour be deemed 
expired, the time for the two leaders be reserved for their use later 
in the day, and that there then be a period for the transaction of 
morning business for up to 1 hour, with Senators permitted to speak for 
up to 10 minutes each, and that the Senate then resume consideration of 
the motion to proceed to S. 3297.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 88849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20753 and #20754; GEORGIA Disaster Number GA-
20014]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Georgia

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 6.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Georgia 
(FEMA-4830-DR), dated October 9, 2024.
    Incident: Hurricane Helene.

DATES: Issued on November 4, 2024.
    Incident Period: September 24, 2024 through October 30, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: December 9, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: July 9, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Georgia, dated October 9, 2024 is hereby amended to update the incident 
period for this disaster as beginning September 24, 2024 and continuing 
through October 30, 2024.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-26034 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Registration Statement Nos. 33-62797, 333-38199, 333-84320,
333-102373, 333-134864, 333-160018) of American Express Credit Corporation of
    our report dated March 30, 2009, except for the effects of the restatement
    described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, as to which
    the date is November 16, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements
    of American Express Credit Corporation, which appears in this Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New
York
November 16, 2009

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      1,914,148
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      3,002,685
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 2,063,806
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      2,976,035
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        2,976,035
<LOANS>                                    50,805,141
<ALLOWANCE>                                   148,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             63,891,590
<DEPOSITS>                                 52,995,357
<SHORT-TERM>                                1,750,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         1,848,370
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        4,694
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,293,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             63,891,590
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             1,119,873
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              66,601
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               47,469
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            1,233,943
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            561,592
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            601,428
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         632,515
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  25,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               132,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               242,908
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    242,908  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  142,842
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.27
<LOANS-NON>                                   487,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                  406,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              124,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   4,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    2,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             148,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          148,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10869]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 154

WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2008

No. 185
```
AAM-11-331-E June 10, 2011 Exemption No. 10284 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0574

Mr. Monte R. Myers Double M Helicopters, Inc. 242 Pirates Loop, S.E. Mandan, ND 58554

Dear Mr. Myers:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 19, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Double M Helicopters, Inc. (Double M) for an exemption from § 120.117(a)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Double M, which is operating under separate parts of 14 CFR, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Double M.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—2

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Double M Helicopters, Inc. an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Double M, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the

conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Double M are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Double M part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M. D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dean L. Cash,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of ATEL  Financial  Services,  LLC,
General  Partner of ATEL Cash  Distribution  Fund VI, L.P. (the  "Partnership"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended
September  30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:       November 11, 2004



/s/ Dean L. Cash
------------------------------------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive
Officer of General Partner


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  Partnership  and  will  be  retained  by the  Partnership  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.