alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26289]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 28, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 559 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-185, K2025-183.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26289 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1230]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
  No committee meetings were held.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90088-90089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26367]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby

[[Page 90089]]

gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 31, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 607 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-250, K2025-248.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26367 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                         MEDIRISK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                        THREE MONTHS
                                                                                                       ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                                                      1998         1997
                                                                                                      ----         ----
<S>                                                                                                 <C>          <C>     
Net loss attributable to common stock                                                               $(4,126)     $  (749)
                                                                                                    =======      =======

Net loss per share of common stock - basic and diluted:
Income (loss) per share before extraordinary item                                                   $ (0.92)     $  0.02
Loss per share - extraordinary item                                                                      --        (0.25)
                                                                                                    -------      -------

Net loss per share of common stock                                                                  $ (0.92)     $ (0.23)
                                                                                                    =======      =======

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted                              4,495        3,265
                                                                                                    =======      =======
</TABLE>
    





                                       18
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2336]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          EARMARK DECLARATION

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. DAVE WELDON

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, November 20, 2008

  Mr. WELDON of Florida. Madam Speaker, pursuant to the Republican 
Leadership standards on earmarks, I am submitting the following 
information for publication in the Congressional Record regarding 
earmarks I received as part of H.R. 2638, the Consolidated Security, 
Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009:
  Requesting Member: Rep. Dave Weldon (FL-15).
  Bill Number: HR 2638.
  Account: Military Construction.
  Legal Name of Requesting Entity: EDC of Florida's Space Coast.
  Address of Requesting Entity: 597 Haverty Court, Suite 100, 
Rockledge, FL 32955.
  Description of Request: Construct a permanent Satellite Operations 
Support Facility (SOSF). The new facility will support existing and 
future satellite processing operations for GPS II, GPS Ill, the Space 
Based Infrared System (SBIRS) and future generations of military 
satellites. The new facility will provide a consolidated location for 
approximately 140 personnel.
```
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 6, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-826

Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-203 & 11-948

________________



### Luis A. Soro

, Appellant,

vs.



### Jose L. Soro

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby Cynamon

, Judge.

Luis A. Soro

, in proper person.

Jerome Hurtak

, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Upon consideration of the initial brief, and finding no preliminary basis for

reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).

Affirmed.

2
#### Werdehoff Realty Company, Appellant, vs. City of Milwaukee and others, Respondents.

*February 10*

March *7, 1933.*

For the appellant there were briefs by *Walter J. Matti-son,*attorney, and *Gold & McCann, Walter D. Corrigan, Sr.,*and *August C. Backus*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Mattison, Mr. J. E. Porter, Mr. Cor-rigan, Mr. Walter L. Gold,*and *Mr. Backus,*all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Max Raskin,*city attorney, *William F. Quick,*first assistant city attorney, *Herbert C. Hirschboeck*and *H. A. Kovenock,*assistant city attorneys, and oral argument by *Mr. Quick, Mr. Hirsch-boeck,*and *Mr. Kovenock.*

Fowler, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *Schlitz Realty Corporation v. City of Milwaukee, ante,*p. 62, 247 N. W. 459, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Court.*— The judgment and orders of the circuit court are affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         293,348
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       8,996,665
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    248,750
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       3,520,139
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         3,528,000
<LOANS>                                     23,587,727
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (59,671)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,079,513
<DEPOSITS>                                  34,541,995
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            346,502
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,319
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,111,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              39,079,513
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                389,108
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               55,254
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               165,788
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               610,150
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             419,478
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             419,478
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          190,672
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                242,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,560)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (23,760)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,760)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.20
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                58,171
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               59,671
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            59,671
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<LEGEND>
                                  EXHIBIT 27.1

                       PLAY CO. TOYS & ENTERTAINMENT CORP.

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

This  schedule  contains  summary  information   extracted  from  the  condensed
consolidated  balance  sheet,  statements of operations and cash flows and notes
thereto  incorporated in Part 1, Item 1, of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                  12,295,195
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           985,422
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             14,175,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        28,753,164
<PP&E>                                  12,144,350
<DEPRECIATION>                          4,832,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          40,512,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   10,198,081
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             7,866,020
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                              8,456,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            16,322,547
<SALES>                                 30,691,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        30,691,508
<CGS>                                   17,370,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           14,790,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      998,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (2,932,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (2,932,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (2,932,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.92)



</TABLE>
#### Wm. H. McHenry *et al.,*Appellants, v. Stephen King, Assignee, Appellee.

General Assignment: trust fund: sureties: subrogation.

*Appeal from Harrison District ‘ Gomt.*— Hon. G. W. Wakefield, Judge.

Thursday, January 21, 1892.

Action in equity to recover for an amount of money paid by the plaintiffs as sureties for the assignors of the defendants. A demurrer to the petition was sustained, and the plaintiffs *appeal.*

Affirmed.

*John A. Berry,*for appellants.

*8.1. King,*for appollee.

*718Robinson, C. J.

The petition shows the following facts: In January, 1888, the board of supervisors of Harrison county authorized L. E. Massey, the county treasurer, to deposit in the Boyer Valley Bank of Woodbine, Iowa, a certain sum of money, as authorized by section 912 of the Code. A bond signed by the plaintiffs as sureties was given as contemplated by the statute, and money to the amount of three thousand, five hundred and sixty-seven dollars and fifty-two cents was thereafter deposited in the bank by the treasurer. The bond stated, in effect, that Phineas Cadwell and William C. Cadwell, as partners, were the owners of the bank. On the ninth day of October, 1888, the members of the bank made to the defendant a general assignment of all the property of the bank for the benefit of their creditors. At that time the deposit specified had not been drawn out, and in December, 1888, on demand of the treasurer, it was paid to him by the plaintiffs as sureties. The bond was at that time delivered to them, and they were subrogated to all the rights which had been held by the county and the treasurer. The plaintiffs were induced to sign the bond by the assurances of the officers of the bank that it was solvent and in a prosperous condition, and by the statement that the bond would be signed by more persons than the number who actually signed it. At the time the bond was obtained and at the time the deposits were made the bank was hopelessly insolvent, but the plaintiffs signed the bond believing the statements of the officers to be true. They claim that the deposit should be treated as a trust fund, and that the amount they paid to the treasurer should be refunded to them before payments are made to other creditors, and ask for an order directing such payment to be made by the defendant. The ground of the demurrer is that the facts stated in the petition do not entitle the plaintiffs to the relief demanded. It appears that the questions involved in this ease are the same as those considered and determined in *Cadwell v. King,*84 Iowa, 228. Wo adhere to the conclusions announced in that case. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
#### Finefrock *v.*United Traction Company, Appellant

May 13, 1907:

(No. 2).

Argued April 11, 1907.

Appeal, No. 52, April T., 1907, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1902, No. 857, on verdict for plaintiff in case of David C. Finefrock and Margaret Finefrock, his wife, v. The United Traction Company.

Before Rice, P. J., Henderson, Morrison, Head and Beaver, JJ.

Affirmed.

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

In the court below two verdicts were rendered in a joint action, brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant. J udgment being entered thereon, separate appeals were taken to this court.

We have just filed an opinion in No. 51, ante, p. 638, in which, for the reasons therein stated, the judgment for one of the plaintiffs is affirmed. For like reasons, which need not here be repeated, the judgment in favor of the other defendant is likewise affirmed.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 463 

Honoring the memory and service of Omaha Police Officer Kerrie Orozco. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2016 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. SASSE, and Mrs. ERNST) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the memory and service of Omaha Police Officer 

Kerrie Orozco. 

Whereas Officer Kerrie Orozco bravely served the Omaha Police Department for 7 years as an officer and detective, 

working in the gang unit of the Omaha Police Department; 

Whereas Officer Orozco was a beloved wife, daughter, sister, 

and mother; 

Whereas Officer Orozco was a devoted public servant who engaged in many volunteer pursuits in Nebraska and Iowa, 

including youth sports, youth mentoring, and animal rescue; 

Whereas, as a parishioner of St. Joseph Church in Omaha, 

Officer Orozco was committed to her Catholic faith; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 463 ATS 

Whereas Officer Orozco was killed in the line of duty on May 

20, 2015, while serving an arrest warrant on a suspect; 

and 

Whereas Officer Orozco was the first female officer of the 

Omaha Police Department to be killed in the line of duty: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the memory and 

2 service of Omaha Police Officer Kerrie Orozco. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 175 (Monday, November 17, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10535]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 513 

Designating September 25, 2016, as ‘‘National Lobster Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2016 

Mr. KING (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. REED, Mr. MURPHY, 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mrs. SHAHEEN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 25, 2016, as ‘‘National Lobster 

Day’’. 

Whereas the American lobster is recognized around the world 

as a prized and flavorful culinary delicacy; 

Whereas lobster fishing has served as an economic engine and 

family tradition in the United States for centuries; 

Whereas thousands of families in the United States make 

their livelihoods from lobster fishing and processing; 

Whereas more than 120,000,000 pounds of lobster is caught 

each year in the waters of the United States, representing one of the most valuable catches in the United 

States; 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 513 IS 

Whereas foreign markets for lobster from the United States 

are booming, with export values having more than doubled since 2009; 

Whereas historical lore notes that lobster likely joined turkey 

on the table at the very first Thanksgiving feast in 1621; 

Whereas responsible lobstering practices beginning in the 

1600s have created one of the most sustainable fisheries 

in the world; 

Whereas Lobster Newburg was featured at the inaugural dinner celebration for President John F. Kennedy; 

Whereas lobster is an excellent source of lean protein and is 

low in saturated fat and high in vitamin B12; 

Whereas lobster has become a culinary icon, with the lobster 

roll featured at the 2015 World Food Expo in Milan, 

Italy; 

Whereas the White House proudly served lobster at the State 

Dinner with Chinese President Xi Jinping on National 

Lobster Day in 2015; 

Whereas, on September 24, 2015, steamed lobster was prepared for the visit by Pope Francis to New York; 

Whereas lobster is enjoyed at casual beach-side lobster boils 

and also revered as a delicacy at fine dining restaurants; 

and 

Whereas the peak of the lobstering season in the United 

States occurs in the late summer: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 25, 2016, as National 

3 Lobster Day; and 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 513 IS 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 activities. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-021-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[House]
[Pages H10869-H10870]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDICS OF STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

  (Ms. FOXX asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. FOXX. Madam Speaker, earlier this fall I had the privilege to 
visit Zimmer Manufacturing in Statesville, North Carolina. During my 
visit to Zimmer's Statesville facility, I witnessed a thriving company 
committed to producing high quality surgical

[[Page H10870]]

products. But as impressed as I was with Zimmer's Statesville plant, I 
was more impressed with the company's dedication to its employees and 
their safety.
  This summer the Zimmer plant logged more than 1 million safe hours 
with no injuries or illnesses that resulted in lost work days. That is 
nearly four straight years of providing a flawless safety record. So I 
was not surprised when I found out later that Doug Pond, the supervisor 
at Zimmer, won first place in the annual North Carolina Statewide 
Safety Talk Contest hosted by the North Carolina Industrial Commission 
in Greensboro, North Carolina.
  I congratulate Zimmer of Statesville for its impressive safety record 
and for its commitment to providing an accident-free workplace. During 
these uncertain economic times, it's good to talk about a company that 
is doing something right.

                          ____________________
```