alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 567 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-194, K2025-192.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26308 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# Official Journal C 252/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 252 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4918 October 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 252

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4918 October 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 252/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 252/2 | Notice inviting applications for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block P1 of the Dutch continental shelf | 2 |
| 2006/C 252/3 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 252/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 252/2

Notice inviting applications for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block P1 of the Dutch continental shelf

2

2006/C 252/3

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Rare Element Resources, Ltd.


Exhibit 4.2




Approved by the Board of Directors on

November 23, 2006 and approved by the Members at

the Annual General Meeting held on November 23, 2006



























ADDENDUM - INCENTIVE SHARE OPTION PLAN













November, 2006

















ADDENDUM TO STOCK OPTION PLAN

THIS ADDENDUM dated effective as of the 23rd day of November, 2006

WHEREAS Rare Element Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) amends the number of shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the exercise of stock options in the Stock Option Plan dated December 11, 2002 (the “Plan”) as follows:




1.

Section 1.4 (a) of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and substituted by the following:




“1.4

Shares Reserved

(a)

The maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance for all purposes under the Plan shall not exceed 4,129,544 common shares with vesting provisions for plans that reserve more than 10%.  

The maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one person in a 12 month period under the Plan shall be 5% of the Common Shares outstanding at the time of the grant (on a non-diluted basis) less the aggregate number of Common Shares reserved for issuance to such person under any other option to purchase Common Shares from treasury granted as a compensation or incentive mechanism.  

The number of options granted to any one Consultant or to any persons employed to provide investor relations activities in a 12 month period must not exceed 2% of the issued Common Shares of the Corporation, calculated at the date the option was granted.”

2.

All of the capitalized terms not defined herein shall bear the meaning assigned thereto in the Plan.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2630
CHARLES A. TAYLOR, Petitioner, versusW. A. BENNETT COAL COMPANY; OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS'COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (94-0172-BLA) Submitted: March 19, 1996 Decided: March 28, 1996 Before HALL, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles A. Taylor, Petitioner Pro Se. Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, ARTER & HADDEN, Washington, D.C.; Christian P. Barber, Jill M. Otte, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Claude Taylor seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the Board's decision. Taylor v. W. A. Bennett Coal Co. , No. 94-0172-BLA (B.R.B. July 31, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Estate of Watzek: Purdy, Appellant, vs. Watzek, Administratrix, Respondent.

*February 9*

March 7, *1933.*

*Gold & McCann,*attorneys, and *John C. Love*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

*C. F. Rogan*of Pewaukee, for the respondent.

*51Fritz, J.

Dr. Frederick P. Purdy filed a claim for $115 against the estate of Frank Watzek for medical services performed in attending the deceased and his wife. On the hearing the claimant testified as to the nature of the services, and he and another physician testified that $115 was a fair and reasonable charge for such services. No testimony was introduced by way of contradiction or impeachment. The court, however, allowed the claim at only $35, and in connection with that ruling stated that the estate was practically insolvent. Dr. Purdy appealed from that ruling and contends that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, he was entitled on the uncontradicted proof to have his claim allowed at $115.

Under the evidence there is no basis for holding that the' charge for the services is obviously so unreasonable or excessive that the testimony is palpably false and incredible, and can therefore be entirely disregarded by the court. It is insufficient that the court felt that the charges were high inasmuch as the estate was practically insolvent. This court has held that the value of such professional services as are ■ rendered by physicians, dentists, architects, and others engaged in similar professional pursuits is not a subject of general knowledge or such as comes within the field wherein courts can take judicial notice of certain classes of facts; that proper proof as to the measure of compensation in such matters requires the evidence of those familiar as experts with such work and the customary pay therefor in the particular locality where rendered *(Tullgren v. Karger,*173 Wis. 288, 293, 181 N. W. 232); and that “in such cases neither court nor jury can use their own individual views nor those of persons unfamiliar with such particular subjects as proper basis for their findings as against the uncon-tradicted or unimpeached testimony of those who are qualified to know and speak on the subject.” *Holsapple v. Scofield*176 Wis. 649, 187 N. W. 682; *Wurdemann v. Barnes,*
      *5292 Wis. 206, 207, 66 N. W. 111; *Ladd v. Witte,*116 Wis. 35, 40, 92 N. W. 365; *Brust v. First Nat. Bank,*184 Wis. 15, 198 N. W. 749.

The application of those principles of law entitles the appellant to the allowance of his claim at $115. That result would not necessarily follow if the charges were palpably so unconscionably excessive as to compel the conclusion that the evidence in support thereof is unbelievable; or if the facts in issue were of such nature that the trial judge could take judicial knowledge thereof, as he could, for instance, in passing upon the customary charges for legal services in his locality.

*By the Cotirt.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment allowing appellant’s claim at $115.
# Official Journal C 187/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 187 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 585 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 187

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 585 June 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2015/C 187/01 | Position (EU) No 9/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/ECAdopted by the Council on 20 April 2015 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 187/02 | Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 9/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC | 47 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2015/C 187/01

Position (EU) No 9/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/ECAdopted by the Council on 20 April 2015 (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 187/02

Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 9/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC

47

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to                               ( print page 90081)                            the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 14, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 423 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-218, K2025-216.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-26341 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
##### 



Exhibit 10.30

May 29, 2003

Anthony DiCesare
527 Madison Avenue
17th Floor
New York, NY 10022

Dear Koots:

Pursuant to Section 4(b) of your employment agreement dated as of July 1, 1997,
as amended (the Employment Agreement) between Alliance Gaming Corporation
(the Company) and you and with respect to each Employment Year for the
remainder of the Term, the Company deems that (i) in the event that the Company
elects in its discretion to employ your services in connection with a
significant financing, then the closing of each significant financing as
defined in said Employment Agreement shall be an appropriate performance goal
for the Company, and the Company agrees to pay you an aggregate target Bonus of
0.3125% of the Value of such significant financing less $62,500 (Value being
determined as set forth in Section 4 (b) paragraph 2 subsection (y)) upon
closing of each such significant financing (the Financing Compensation) and
(ii) in the event that the Company elects in its discretion to employ your
services in connection with a significant merger, then the closing of each
significant merger as defined in said Employment Agreement shall be an
appropriate performance goal for the Company, and the Company agrees to pay you
an aggregate target Bonus of 0.3875% of the Value of such significant merger
less $100,000 (Value being determined as set forth in Section 4 (b) paragraph 2
subsection (x)) upon closing of each such significant merger (the Merger
Compensation). Each such Financing Compensation amount and each such Merger
Compensation amount shall be inclusive of any minimum Bonuses otherwise due to
you for each significant financing or significant merger, as applicable.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, you shall be entitled to only
the minimum Bonus upon closing of the currently proposed sale of United Coin
and you shall be entitled to minimum Bonuses for each such significant
financing and significant merger for which you do not otherwise receive the
Financing Compensation or the Merger Compensation.

Further, pursuant to Board action taken on April 22, 2003, the Company has
elected to employ your services for the Companys next significant financing
(i.e., a refinancing of the Companys outstanding bank debt and bonds, whether
in one or a series of related transactions) upon closing of which the Financing
Compensation shall be paid to you as set forth above.

Defined terms used herein (other than those terms specifically defined herein)
shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement. This
agreement does not change any terms in the Employment Agreement other than
those terms specifically set forth above.

Sincerely,

ALLIANCE GAMING CORPORATION

/s/ Robert L. Miodunski

AGREED to and ACCEPTED as of the date hereof:

/s/ Anthony DiCesare

Anthony DiCesare
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      4,428,868
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      1,783,585
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            1,075,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 1,946,867
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      7,357,142
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        7,357,142
<LOANS>                                    78,624,259
<ALLOWANCE>                                   413,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            100,719,473
<DEPOSITS>                                 84,601,704
<SHORT-TERM>                                3,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           461,559
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        6,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 10,480,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            100,719,473
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             1,644,863
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             129,220
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               84,735
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            1,858,818
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            900,874
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            931,486
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         927,332
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  22,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               198,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               288,493
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    288,493
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  101,736
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.93
<LOANS-NON>                                   821,136
<LOANS-PAST>                                  128,147
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              388,863
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   2,090
<RECOVERIES>                                    4,240
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             413,513
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          413,513
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0


</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 24

- 00260

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

v. HAMURABI RODRIGUEZ

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court of Wharton County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR24121

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 13, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 88764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25972]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-151]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed October 28, 2024 10 a.m. EST Through November 4, 2024 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20240196, Final, NPS, FL, Big Cypress National Preserve, Final 
Backcountry Access Plan/Wilderness Study/Final Environmental Impact 
Statement, Review Period Ends: 12/09/2024, Contact: Thomas Forsyth 239-
695-1101.
EIS No. 20240197, Final, BLM, OR, Lakeview Proposed Resource Management 
Plan Amendment and Final Environmental Impact Statement, Review Period 
Ends: 12/09/2024, Contact: Michael Collins 541-947-6112.
EIS No. 20240199, Final Supplement, USFWS, BLM, UT, Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement to Reconsider a Highway Right-of-Way and 
Associated Amendment of an Incidental Take Permit, Washington County, 
Utah, Review Period Ends: 12/09/2024, Contact: Dawna Ferris-Rowley 435-
688-3216.
EIS No. 20240200, Draft, USACE, TX, Cedar Port Navigation District 
Channel Deepening Project, Baytown, Texas, Comment Period Ends: 12/23/
2024, Contact: Christopher B. Ford 409-766-3079.
EIS No. 20240201, Final Supplement, USFWS, BLM, AK, Coastal Plain Oil 
and Gas Leasing Program, Review Period Ends: 12/09/2024, Contact: 
Serena Sweet 907-271-4543.
EIS No. 20240202, Final Supplement, USACE, MD, Mid-Chesapeake Bay 
Island Ecosystem Restoration at James Island, Review Period Ends: 12/
09/2024, Contact: Dr. Angela Sowers 410-962-7440.

    Dated: November 4, 2024.
Timothy Witman,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2024-25972 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P