September 3, 2015

Exemption No. 11267B

Regulatory Docket No

. FAA− 20 14

− 0918

Mr. Charlie Terry

Engineering Manager

ETAK Systems, Inc.

4045 Perimeter West Drive, Suite 600

Charlotte, NC 28214

Dear Mr. Terry :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By le tter posted to the docket on June 26, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) on behalf of ETAK Systems, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner or operator)

for an amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ),

61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform a erial data

collection

. You requested an amendment to add the DJI Inspire 1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exe mption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

. T he

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed

and operating capabilities to those in this petition

.

Airworthiness Certification

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112

− 95 in

reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited

operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation2

has determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA

finds that relief from 14 CFR part 21, C ertification procedures for products and parts,

Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing

requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of

Exemption No. 11267 remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the

authority contained in 49 U.S.C

. 1 06(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the

Administrator, the operator is granted an amendment to add new aircraft to its UAS

operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11267 remain in effect except as

follows. Condition No. 1 has been updated to reflect the additional aircraft

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exempti on will be

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom 2,

DJI Phantom 2 Vision +, DJI Phantom 3 , and the DJI Inspire 1 when weighing less

than 55 p ounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will

require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

T his exemption terminates on April 30, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service