alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit23**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of DirectorsAeroflex Incorporated:

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8(No. 33-75496, No. 33-88868, No. 33-88878, No. 333-42399,No. 333-42405, No. 333-64611, No. 333-90173, No. 333-31654,No. 333-53626, No. 333-53622, No. 333-61094, No. 333-73646,No. 333-97027, No. 333-97029, No. 333-10860A,No. 333-103322 and No. 333-128483) and on Form S-3(No. 333-53618, No. 333-111094 and No. 333-110599) of AeroflexIncorporated of our reports dated September 12, 2006, relating to (i) theconsolidated balance sheets of Aeroflex Incorporated and subsidiaries (theCompany) as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidatedstatements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cashflows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2006,and the related financial statement schedule, and (ii) management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June30, 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof June 30, 2006, which reports appear in the June 30, 2006 Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Aeroflex Incorporated. Our report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements referredto in (i) above contains an explanatory paragraph related to the Company’sadoption of FASB Interpretation No. 47, *Accounting for ConditionalAsset Retirement Obligations,*effective June 30, 2006, and theadoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*, effective July 1, 2005.
| /s/ KPMG LLP       |   |
|--------------------|--------|
|               |
|               |
|               |
| Melville, New York |
| September 12, 2006 |

 

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ABINGTON LITTLE LEAGUE, INC.

v.

GLENBURN TOWNSHIP ZONING 

HEARING BOARD

PETITION OF: DAVID DRUCK; MARILYN 

DRUCK; LYNN SANSKY; CHARLES 

SANSKY; GERARD O'SULLIVAN; CARA 

O'SULLIVAN; & MARILYN COSTA

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 199 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth 

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 99.14  CONSENT OF CAROL PLUMMER  I consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March     , 2017 (the Annual Report) of my name and the information that I have approved of as a qualified person under the Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 in the Annual Information Form of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited dated March     , 2017 (the AIF) filed as part of the Annual Report.  I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-10 (registration no. 333-206498), Form F-3D (registration no. 333-215096) and Form S-8 (registration nos. 333-130339 and 333-152004) of the reference to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.  March 27, 2017  /s/Carol PlummerCarol PlummerVice President, Project   Development, Southern Business
직업 안전 및 건강

법률로 규정된 의무입니다!

모든 근로자는 다음과 같은 권리가 있습니다.

 안전한 직장. 

 보복 당하는 일 없이 여러분의 고용주 또는 

OSHA(직업 안전 위생 관리국)에 안전 문제 

또는 건강 문제를 제기하거나, 작업 관련 부상 

또는 질병을 보고하십시오. 

 작업장의 모든 위험 물질들을 비롯한 직무 

관련 위험 요소에 대한 정보와 교육을 

받으십시오. 

 안전하지 않거나 건강에 해로운 환경이 

존재한다고 생각되면 귀하의 작업장에 대한 

OSHA 검사를 요청하십시오. OSHA는 귀하의 

이름을 비밀로 취급합니다. 귀하는 본인을 

대신해서 대표자가 OSHA에 연락하도록 할 

권리가 있습니다. 

 OSHA 검사에 참여해서(또는 대표자가 

참여하도록 해서) 비밀 보장 하에 검사관과 

대화하십시오. 

 귀하가 귀하의 권리를 행사했다는 이유로 

보복 당한 경우 30일 이내에 (전화, 

온라인, 우편을 통해) OSHA에 진정서를 

제출하십시오. 

 귀하의 고용주에게 발부된 OSHA 소환장이 

있는지 확인하십시오.

 귀하의 의료기록 사본, 직장 내 위험 요소 

측정 시험 결과 사본, 작업장 부상 및 질병 

기록 사본을 요청하십시오.

고용주는 다음과 같은 책임이 있습니다.

 알려진 위험요소가 없는 직장을 종업원에게 

제공해야 합니다. 종업원이 고용주 또는 

OSHA에 건강 및 안전 관련 우려사항을 

제기하거나 작업 관련 부상이나 질병을 

신고하는 행위를 비롯하여 종업원이 법률에 

의거하여 자신의 권리를 행사했다는 이유로 

보복하는 것은 불법입니다. 

 모든 해당 OSHA 기준을 준수해야 합니다. 

 모든 작업 관련 사망을 8시간 내에 OSHA에 

보고해야 하며, 모든 입원, 절단 사고, 실명 

사고는 24시간 내에 보고해야 합니다. 

 직원들이 이해할 수 있는 언어와 어휘로 

필요한 교육훈련을 제공해야 합니다.

 작업장 내부 눈에 잘 띄는 곳에 에 이 

포스터를 게시해야 합니다. 

 고용주는 위반 혐의가 발생한 장소 또는 

인근에 OSHA 소환장을 게시해야 합니다.

모든 주에서 중소기업 고용주는 OSHA가 

지원하는 상담 프로그램을 통해 소환장이나 

벌금 없이 위험요인 파악 및 교정에 

관한 도움을 무료로 받을 수 있습니다.

미국 노동부

(U.S. Department of Labor)

OSHA에 연락하십시오. 저희는 

도움을 드릴 수 있습니다. 

1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • 전신타자기 (TTY) 1-877-889-5627 • www.osha.gov

이 무료 포스터는 OSHA에서 구할 수 있습니다.

OSHA 3725-07R 2019It’s the Law — Korean

산업안전보건청

(Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration)
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. George Kern, Appellant.

Criminal Law: assault : appeal.

*Appeal from Polk. District Court.*— Hon. W. F. Conrad, Judge.

Thursday, October 23, 1890.

Indictment for assault with intent to murder. The defendant was convicted on his plea of guilty of the crime of an assault with intent to inflict great bodily injury. From a judgment imposing a fine of *753•one hundred dollars, and costs, and that the defendant be imprisoned in the county jail for thirty days unless the fine be paid, the defendant appeals.

No appearance for either party.

Granger, J.

The only paper before us is a transcript of the proceedings below showing the indictment and proceedings upon which the conviction was had. The record discloses no error in the proceedings, and the judgment is affirmed.
#### V. C. BARRINGER, Guardian, &c., v. W. *J.*HOLBROOK.

Where an appeal from a magistrate is regular in form, and the Court discovers no error in the proceedings, — the judgment should be one affirming that given below, and not, dismissing the appeal.

(Case where a note was allowed as a set off because of theTexpress agreement of the parties.)

Civil action, tried, upon appeal from a Justice of the Peace, by *Logcm, J.,*at Spring Term 1870 of Cabarrus Court.

The cause of action was a note given by the defendant to the plaintiff, for the hire of a slave for 1860. The slave belonged to one J. E. Eussell, a ward of - the plaintiff, and at the hiring, it was bid off by one E. E. Eussell, another ward of the plaintiff. The plaintiff declined to take a bond for the price from the hirer, because of the relation between them, but told the defendant to give his bond therefor, and then to take a bond for the same amount from the hirer, payable to himself; and that upon a settlement he (plaintiff) *541would, allow the latter bond as a set off to the one given to him. These bonds were accordingly executed.

Upon the trial before the magistrate the set off was allowed, and the plaintiff appealed.

When the case was tried by his Honor, he ordered the appeal to be dismissed.

The plaintiff appealed again.

*Boyden &*Bailey, and Wilson, for the appellant.

No counsel *contra.*

Bodman, J.

The set off alleged as a defence was made -so by the express agreement of the plaintiff. The Judge below should have affirmed the judgment of the justice, instead of dismissing the plaintiff’s appeal. The latter course would have been proper, if there had been any irregularity in the appeal itself, but that was not alleged.

Judgment of his Honor reversed, and judgment for the •defendant.

Per Curiam. Judgment accordingly.
RE: One more modeling question. and updates to Illinois' Lead Emissions

Sprague, Jeff to

:

Kaleel, Rob, Andy Chang

Cc

:

"Sprague, Jeff", "Asselmeier, Buzz"

From: "Sprague, Jeff" <Jeff.Sprague@Illinois.gov>

To: "Kaleel, Rob" <Rob.Kaleel@Illinois.gov>, Andy Chang/R5/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Sprague, Jeff" <Jeff.Sprague@Illinois.gov>, "Asselmeier, Buzz" <Buzz.Asselmeier@Illinois.gov>

Andy,

 Yes, the modeling-related questions are fairly easy to answer:

Question #1: Was the air dispersion modeling based on potential or actual emission?

Response: The U.S. Steel – Granite City Works emissions were based upon the facility’s reported actual 

emissions.

Question #2: Were fugitive emissions or re-entrainment of dust factored into your modeling or analyses? 

If so, how were they considered?

Response: Modeled fugitive lead emission sources included uncaptured Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) 

roof monitor emissions and coke battery door emissions. They were treated as volume sources, and in 

total represented 17 discrete modeling input file entries. Lead emission estimates from “re-entrainment 

of dust” from roadways, stockpiles, or other traditional fugitive sources were not available for this 

facility, and thus not modeled. Recent chemical analyses of “grab samples” for slag crushing, coal 

pulverizing, and on-site roadway dust yielded results in which lead (Pb) was below instrument (XRF and 

ICPMS) detection levels.

Jeff Sprague

Air Quality Planning Section

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

217-524-4692

Jeff.Sprague@illinois.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                        81
<INVENTORY>                                        318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,477
<PP&E>                                           2,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,853
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,623)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,833
<SALES>                                          2,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,048
<CGS>                                              658
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (184)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    34
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,859)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,859)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,859)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.19)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alabama National BanCorporation (Alabama National) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William E. Matthews, V, Chief Financial Officer of Alabama National, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Alabama National.





/s/    William E. Matthews, V





William E. Matthews, V


Chief Financial Officer


August 12, 2002
EXHIBIT
32.b
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADDED BY
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Provident Community Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard H. Flake,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the
Report.
 
 
 /s/ 
Richard H. Flake
 Richard H.
Flake
 Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 Date:   May
7, 2008
#### ANDERSON B. HOLDERBY *v.*JOHN C. BLUM.

The assignee oí a bond without notice, who took it before it fell due, as a’secu- • rity for a pre-existing debt, without paying any thing for it, or impairing his original debt, in consideration of the assignment, is not a purchaser so as to protect himself against an equity subsisting in favor of the'obligor, 'to have the bond cancelled.

The case upon the pleadings was as follows. — The plaintiff purchased of A. D. Murphy a tract of land, and executed four bonds, to secure the purchase money, payable at different times. Subsequently the plaintiff became embarrassed, and Murphy agreed to receive a re-conveyance of the land, and to surrender the bonds. This agreement was executed by the plaintiff, but Murphy on several pretences evaded the execution of his part of it, and assigned them before they became due to the defendant, the agent of the Bank of Cape Fear at Salem, as collateral security for a judgment, obtained against him by the bank. ’ Upon this assignment nothing was paid Murphy for the bonds, neither was the judgment of the bank in any way .affected thereby.

The plaintiff prayed that the bonds might be surrendered to bé cancelled, and for an injunction against a suit commenced on them by the defendant.

*J. T. Moorehead*& *Boyden,*for the plaintiff.

*Mendenhall,*for the defendant.

Daniel, Judge,

after stating the facts, proceeded as follows-: The plaintiff, as to Murphy, had an undoubted equity to have the bonds surrendered and cancelled. What is there in the case that puts the defendant in a better situation than his assignor ? The defendant says that he was only agent of the Bank in this transaction. But we think the facts ad*52mitted, in law, make him also the agenQof Murphy. But ^et us Put ^ie case *n ^ stl’ongest light against the plaintiff. Suppose the assignment of the bonds had been to the bank directly; still, if the bank had given no new credit, money or other consideration for the assignment, it could not. pretend to have an equity equal to that of the plaintiff although it' might have the legal title. Therefore the rule, where equity is equal the law shall prevail, could not have aided the bank. In the language of this court, in the case of *Donaldson*v. *Bank of Cape Fear,*1 *Dev. E. Rep.*103, we would ask, what value did the defendant or the bank pay for the assignment ? Nothing — it was to secure a debt contracted before the assignment was contemplated. As regards expenditure, stood after, as it did before the assignment. Had the bank purchased with an antecedent debt, the extinguishment of the debt would have been value sufficient. But the judgment against Murphy, was not released or extinguished by the bank ; it stands in -full force now. The assignment is without'foundation, and as to the plaintiff void. The law, as just stated, was by this court affirmed in the case of *Harris*v. *Horner,*Ante 1st vol. 455._ We think the case clear against the defendant, and the plaintiff must have the decree prayed for. ■ '

The cases 0tDr Cape Pear U Dev- Eq. Harris®, anteUrt yoI. p. 455)

Per Curiam. Decree accordingly.
EXHIBIT 31.02



I, Michael D. Matte, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for CyberGuard Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: November 14,
2003



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL D. MATTE
|                       
|Michael D. Matte       
|Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 923 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 923

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 1999

          Referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
       To promote full equality at the United Nations for Israel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equality for Israel at the United 
Nations Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EFFORT TO PROMOTE FULL EQUALITY AT THE UNITED NATIONS FOR 
              ISRAEL.

    (a) Congressional Statement.--It is the sense of the Congress 
that--
            (1) the United States should help promote an end to the 
        inequity experienced by Israel in the United Nations whereby 
        Israel is the only longstanding member of the organization to 
        be denied acceptance into any of the United Nations region 
        blocs, which serve as the basis for participation in important 
        activities of the United Nations, including rotating membership 
        on the United Nations Security Council; and
            (2) the United States Ambassador to the United Nations 
        should take all steps necessary to ensure Israel's acceptance 
        in the Western Europe and Others Group (WEOG) regional bloc, 
        whose membership includes the non-European countries of Canada, 
        Australia, and the United States.
    (b) Reports to Congress.--Not later than 60 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act and on a quarterly basis thereafter, the 
Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
committees a report which includes the following information (in 
classified or unclassified form as appropriate):
            (1) actions taken by representatives of the United States, 
        including the United States Ambassador to the United Nations, 
        to encourage the nations of the Western Europe and Others Group 
        (WEOG) to accept Israel into their regional bloc;
            (2) efforts undertaken by the Secretary General of the 
        United Nations to secure Israel's full and equal participation 
        in that body;
            (3) specific responses solicited and received by the 
        Secretary of State from each of the nations of Western Europe 
        and Others Group (WEOG) on their position concerning Israel's 
        acceptance into their organization; and
            (4) other measures being undertaken, and which will be 
        undertaken, to ensure and promote Israel's full and equal 
        participation in the United Nations.

            Passed the Senate November 8, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2258]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   CONGRATULATING THE EVANSVILLE MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL BOYS AND GIRLS 
     SOCCER TEAMS FOR WINNING THE 2008 INDIANA SOCCER CHAMPIONSHIPS

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. BRAD ELLSWORTH

                               of indiana

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. ELLSWORTH. Madam Speaker, I rise today to congratulate the 
Evansville Memorial High School boys and girls soccer teams on their 
recent historic achievement. On Saturday, November 1, 2008 the teams 
became the first to win both the boys and girls Indiana soccer 
championships in the same year.
  With their impressive 23-0-2 record, the boys' team--led by Coach 
Bill Vieth, Jr.--defended their state title by defeating the Zionsville 
Eagles 3-2, while Angie Lensing coached the girls' team to its second 
state championship, defeating Fort Wayne Snider 2-0, ending their 
season with a 22-2 record.
  The extraordinary dedication and teamwork shown by these young 
athletes is something they can be proud of long after they have left 
Memorial High School. The teams and coaching staff have demonstrated 
outstanding talent and an unwavering commitment to achieving their 
goals. They are an inspiration to me and everyone in the Evansville, 
Indiana community who have followed them throughout the years.
  Go Tigers!

                          ____________________
```