alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2276]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        A TRIBUTE TO ANISH BERRY

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. EDOLPHUS TOWNS-

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. TOWNS. Madam Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute and to honor 
Mr. Anish Berry. Mr. Berry is the President of the Diagnostic Imaging 
Group, which operates 38 diagnostic imaging centers, 23 of which are in 
New York and 6 in New Jersey under the name Doshi Diagnostic Imaging 
Services, as well as 16 centers in Florida under the name Signet 
Diagnostic Imaging Services.
  Mr. Berry helped to engineer the aggressive growth of the Diagnostic 
Imaging Group by leveraging hardware-and-software prowess with the 
talents of a diverse medical, technical, and administrative staff to 
deliver high-caliber customer service to patients and over 40,000 
referring physicians. This excellent team of medical professionals is 
paired with state of the art equipment in each facility where the full 
range of imaging services are offered, including MRI/MRA, CT, 
Ultrasound, X-ray, Mammography, PET/CT, Nuclear Medicine, Nuclear 
Cardiology, DEXA, Echocardiolgraphy and Vascular Duplex.
  Mr. Berry takes the same aggressive approach to his charitable works. 
He is the co-founder of the Doshi Difference Program at the John Bowne 
High School in Flushing, NY. This unique, selective program affords its 
students an outstanding introduction in research techniques as well as 
valuable learning experiences including scientific competitions, 
mentoring, field trips, and speakers. Mr. Berry was also responsible 
for the recent construction of a brand new science lab at John Bowne 
High School to further assist the students in their quest for 
educational excellence.
  Mr. Berry is also a staunch supporter of law enforcement, serving as 
the Director of the New York Law Enforcement Foundation, the Medical 
Director of Amtrack Police, the Director of the Suffolk County Police 
Reserves, and as a member of the Nassau County Police Reserves.
  Madam Speaker, I would like to recognize Mr. Anish Berry for his 
extraordinary accomplishments in diagnostic imaging, science education, 
and community service.
  Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in paying tribute to 
Mr. Anish Berry.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 11





ALABAMA NATIONAL BANCORPORATION





COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED)


(In thousands, except per share amounts)





Income

Shares

Per Share AmountTHREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002Basic EPS net income

$
8,782

12,359

$
0.71Effect of dilutive securities




298Diluted EPS

$
8,782

12,657

$
0.69THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001Basic EPS net income

$
6,976

11,821

$
0.59Effect of dilutive securities




268Diluted EPS

$
6,976

12,089

$
0.58SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002Basic EPS net income

$
17,390

12,354

$
1.41Effect of dilutive securities




290Diluted EPS

$
17,390

12,644

$
1.38SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001Basic EPS net income

$
12,819

11,805

$
1.09Effect of dilutive securities




275Diluted EPS

$
12,819

12,080

$
1.06
lwasan ang Sakit Sanhi ng lnit 

saTrabaho 

Ang pagkalantad sa init sa labas at sa loob ay maaaring mapanganib. 

Mga Paraan upang Protektahan ang lyong Sarili at ang Iba 

Dahan-dahan sa Trabaho. Halos 3 sa 4 ng mga pagkamatay mula sa sakit sanhi ng init ay nangyayari sa unang linggo ng trabaho. 

100% ✓

✓

Ang bago at bumabalik na mga manggagawa ay kailangang dahan-dahang masanay sa klima (acclimatize) at magpahinga nang madalas.

Sundin ang Patakarang 20%. Sa unang araw, huwag magtrabaho sa init nang higit sa 20% ng haba ng oras ng trabaho sa buong tindi.

Dagdagan ang haba ng oras sa buong tindi nang hindi hihigit sa 20% kada a raw hanggang ang mga manggagawa ay masanay sa

pagtatrabaho sa init.

M

Uminom ng Maligamgam na Tubig 

Uminom ng maligamgam na tubig kahit hindi ka 

nauuhaw - hindi bababa sa 1 tasa kada 20 minuto. 

agpahinga 

Maglaan ng sapat na oras upang makabawi mula sa 

init na du lot ng temperatura, kahalumigmigan, at mga 

kondisyon. 

Humanap ng Lilim o Malamig na Lugar 

Magpahinga sa nakatalagang malilim o malamig na 

lokasyon. 

Magdamit ayon sa lnit 

Magsuot ng sombrero at dam it na may malumanay 

na kulay, maluwag, at maaliwalas kung posible. 

Bantayan ang lsa't Isa 

Subaybayan ang sarili at ang iba para sa mga 

palatandaan ng sakit sanhi ng init. 

Kung Nagsusuot ng Panakip sa Mukha 

Palitan ang iyong panakip ng mukha kung ito ay mabasa 

o madumihan. Kausapin nang madalas ang iba upang

kumustahin sila.

Unang Panlunas para sa Sakit sanhi ng lnit 

Ang sumusunod ay mga palatandaan ng medikal 

na emerhensiya! 

• Hindi normal na pag-iisip o pag-uugali

• Bulol na pagsasalita

• Mga sumpong

• Pagkawala ng malay

1 KAAGAD NA TUMAWAG SA 911 

2 AGAD NA PALAMIGIN ANG MANGGAGAWA GAMIT ANG 

TUBIG O VELO 

3 SAMAHAN ANG MANGGAGAWA HANGGANG DUMATING

ANG TULONG 

Bantayan ang iba pang mga palatandaan ng sakit sanhi ng init at kumilos nang mabilis. Kapag hindi 

sigurado, tumawag sa 911. 

Kung nakararanas ang manggagawa ng: 

Pananakit ng ulo o pagduduwal Panghihina 

o pagkahilo

Matinding pagpapawis o mainit at tuyong 

balat 

Mataas na temperatura ng katawan 

Pagkauhaw 

Pagbawas ang dami ng ihi 

-------•► Gawin ang mga aksyong ito:

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

Magbigay ng maligamgam na tubig upang

1num1n

. . 

Magtanggal ng hindi kinakailangang na damit

Lumipat sa malilim o mas malamig na lugar

Magpalamig, gamit ang tubig, yelo, pamaypay

Huwag iwanan

Humingi ng medikal na pangangalaga

® 

o 

Pangangasiwa ng 

Kaligtasan at 

Kalugusan sa Trabah

Para sa karagdagang impormasyon: 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) 

TTY 1-877-889-5627 www.osha.gov/heat 

May karapatan ka sa ligtas na lugar ng trabaho ayon sa pederal na batas. Mayroon kang karapatang magsalita 

tungkol sa mga panganib nang walang takot ng paghihiganti. Tingnan ang ww.osha.gov/workers para sa 

impormasyon tungkol sa kung paano magsampa ng kumpidensyal na reklamo sa OSHA at humiling ng inspeksyon. 

2023-02 OSHA 421

3
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 551 

Honoring the Maine-Endwell Little League Team of Endwell, New York, 

for the victory of the team in the 2016 Little League World Series. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2016 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the Maine-Endwell Little League Team of Endwell, 

New York, for the victory of the team in the 2016 

Little League World Series. 

Whereas, on Saturday, August 27, 2016, the Maine-Endwell 

Little League Team won the United States championship 

at the Little League Baseball World Series, defeating a 

talented and energetic team from Goodlettsville, Tennessee, by 4 to 2; 

Whereas, on Sunday, August 28, 2016, the Maine-Endwell 

Little League Team competed against the East Seoul 

Little League Team of South Korea in the 70th Little 

League Baseball World Series championship and won 2 

to 1, rounding out an amazing undefeated season in 

which the team won 24 games and lost none; 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 551 IS 

Whereas the Maine-Endwell Little League Team is the first 

United States team to win the Little League Baseball 

World Series title since 2011 and the first team from the 

State of New York to win the championship since 1964; 

Whereas the Maine-Endwell Little League Team showed humility and grace both on and off the diamond, earning 

the 2016 Jack Losch Little League Baseball World Series Team Sportsmanship Award, and was the first team 

ever to win the World Series title and the sportsmanship 

award in the same year; 

Whereas the Maine-Endwell Little League Team is comprised 

of Billy Dundon, Jude Abbadessa, Brody Raleigh, Michael Mancini, Jordan Owens, Conner Rush, Justin 

Ryan, Jack Hopko, James Fellows, Jayden Fanara, and 

Ryan Harlost; 

Whereas the Maine-Endwell Little League Team is managed 

and coached by Scott Rush, Joe Mancini, and Joe 

Hopko, among others; and 

Whereas the Maine-Endwell Little League Team has brought 

tremendous excitement, pride, and honor to the Southern 

Tier of New York, the State of New York, and the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates and honors the Maine3 Endwell Little League Team and their fans on the 

4 victory of the team at the 70th Little League Base5 ball World Series championship; 

6 (2) recognizes and commends the hard work, 

7 dedication, determination, and commitment to excelVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:40 Sep 12, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR551.IS SR551

smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 551 IS 

1 lence of the members, parents, families, coaches, and 

2 managers of the Maine-Endwell Little League Team; 

3 and 

4 (3) recognizes and commends the people of the 

5 Town of Union, Broome County, and the Southern 

6 Tier of New York for their incredible dedication, loy7 alty, and support for the Maine-Endwell Little 

8 League Team throughout the season. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 167 (Monday, October 20, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1249]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
  No committee meetings were held.
```
# C_2022380EN.01001801.xml

| 3.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/18

---

Action brought on 20 July 2022 — PW v EEAS

(Case T-448/22)

(2022/C 380/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PW (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the implicit decision of the defendant dated 30 July 2021 refusing to correct the calculation of the reimbursement of his annual travel expenses for 2020 as regards his children and, in as far as necessary, the annulment of the decision of the defendant, dated 14 April 2022, rejecting his complaint filed on 28 October 2021, under Article 90(2) of the EU Staff Regulations; and, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the implicit decision of the defendant dated 30 July 2021 refusing to correct the calculation of the reimbursement of his annual travel expenses for 2020 as regards his children and, in as far as necessary, the annulment of the decision of the defendant, dated 14 April 2022, rejecting his complaint filed on 28 October 2021, under Article 90(2) of the EU Staff Regulations; and,

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs incurred by the applicant for the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs incurred by the applicant for the present appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a breach of Articles 7(1) and 8(1) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations and a breach of the principle of good administration. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a breach of Articles 7(1) and 8(1) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations and a breach of the principle of good administration.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty of care. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty of care.

---
#### STATE v. HILLSMAN MORGAN.

*Appeal*— Practice *in Criminal Cases.*

In criminal cases, a defendant cannot appeal without security, unless lie-makes an affidavit that he is advised by counsel that he has reasonable cause for appeal and that his appeal is in good faith. The Superior Court has no right to allow such appeal merely for delay.

INDICTMENT for Murder tried at Spring’ Term, 1877, off FkanKlin Superior Court, before *Buxton, J.*

The exceptions upon which the appeal was taken are set out by Mr. Justice Reads in delivering the opinion of this Court. There was a verdict of guilty. Judgment. Appeal by the defendant.

*Attorney General,*for the State.

No Counsel for the defendant.

Reade, J.

In criminal actions every reasonable indulgence is granted the defendant. And if convicted he is allowed an appeal to the Supreme Court without security if he is unable to give it. There is however one restriction upon his-right of appeal. In as much as he has no new trial in the Supreme Court, but .only questions of law are determined, he is reasonably required to make an affidavit that he is *advised by-counsel*that he has *reasonable cause*for appeal and that his appeal is in good faith.

The law is strictly, just to its subjects and it is the duty of the Courts to execute justice in mercy, but still there must be firmness and decision. Punishment must follow guilty and that with reasonable dispatch and without evasion. The Superior Court has no right to allow an appeal without security merely for delay. There must be a compliance with *511tbe statute. It is not a matter of discretion. If the Legislature had contemplated an appeal.for delay merely, there would have been no necessity for the expense and trouble of an appeal. It might have provided that no convict should be punished until six months after conviction.

There having been no affidavit by the defendant that he had been advised by counsel that he had reasonable cause for the appeal, aiid- that the appeal was in good faith, it might be dismissed as improvidently granted.

The exceptions upon which the case comes up very clearly indicate that the appeal was for delay merely. Probably no-counsel would have risked his reputation in endorsing them,, and no counsel ought to have taken them. There is not only no force in them, but they are trifling. They are:

> 1. “Because witnesses summoned for the prisoner were not present.

> 2. “Because until up to a recent period the prisoner was without counsel.

> 3. “Because the prisoner had not asked for a continuance.

> 4. “Because the Solicitor had entered a *nol pros,*on the first bill and tried on the second bill.

> 5. “Because the *venire*were not summoned to try on the second bill.

> 6. “Because His Honor excused a juror who swore he was-too infirm to serve as a juror.”

It is apparent that there is no force in any of the exceptions taken as they appear of record.

We have examined the whole record and there is no error. This will be certified with this opinion.

PER Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
#### WARREN HARPER *vs*JAMES M. DAVIS.

Where more damages are recovered than are demanded, the plaintiff will be permitted to remit the excess, and have judgment for the proper sum, on paying the costs of this Court.

The case of *Williamson*v. Canady, 3 Ired. 349, cited and approved.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Duplin County, at the Spring Term, 1848, his Honor Judge Deck presiding.

The case began by warrant before a Justice of the Peace for “the sum of twelve dollars due by assumpsit.” Upon non-assumpsit, the verdict was for the plaintiff» and the damages assessed to $12 for principal money, and for interest $1 50; and from a judgment accordingly the defendant appealed.

The defendant excepted to the instructions to the jury; but it is not material to state the point, as his counsel abandoned it here, and moved to reverse the judgment because there was an excess of damages recovered above those demanded. On the part of the plaintiff, there is a motion to remit the excess, and to have judgment for the residue.

*Strange,*for the plaintiff.

*D. Reid,*for the defendant.

Rufpin, C. J.

The case of *Williamson*v. *Canady, 3*Ire. 343, is in point for the plaintiff, on the payment of costs in this Court. Besides the reason there given, it is substantially doing only what the Court would be bound to do on the motion .of the defendant. For, if damages be improperly assessed, as, for example, in a *45popular action, the judgment may be rightly reversed for the penalty, without the damages ; and, if rendered for both debt and damages, upon error brought, the judg* ment is not reversed *in ioto*and judgment arrested, for the incongruity between the declaration and the verdict; but it is reversed as to the damages only, with costs in the Court of error, and affirmed for the debt and the costs in the Court below. *Frederick*v. Lookup, Bur. Rep. 2018. The reason is, that the higher Court is to give such judgment as, upon the whole record, ought to have been given in order to terminate the litigation according to the right apparent between the parties. That is the jurisdiction of this Court under the Statute ; and therefore the judgment of the Superior Court must be reversed as to the sum of $1 50, assessed damages above the sum demanded in the warrant, with costs in this Court, and affirmed for the sum of *$12,*thus demanded, and all the other costs.

Pee Curiam. Judgment accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              87
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,111
<INVENTORY>                                      4,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,310
<PP&E>                                         130,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,637
<BONDS>                                         25,432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,349
<SALES>                                         13,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,899
<CGS>                                           10,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,111
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,060)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,523)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,257)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,266)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,266)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.88)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of Akorn, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Akorn, Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 11, 2011




/s/ RAJAT RAIRajat RaiChief Executive Officer
#### John Williams *v*. Ambrose Jones.

From Pitt.

A. gave liis bond for the hire of a slave for one year. *By*the terms of the hiring he was not to employ the slave on water. He, however, did employ the slave on water, and the slave was drowned. He was Sued for this breach of the terms of hiring, and the value of the slave recovered against him. In an action on his bond for the hire, judgment given for the whole amount. The hiring shall not be apportioned, because of his breach of promise.

This was an action of debt on a bond given for th© hire of a negro slave. - By the terms of the hiring, the Defendant was not permitted to employ the slave on water during the time for which he was hired : but he, in *55violation of these'terms, employed *the*slave on Water, and the slave was drowned. For this he was sued, and a verdict given for the value of the slave *;*and now being sued upon his bond for the hire, a question arose, whether the hire should be apportioned, and the Defendant be charg’ed only for the time the slave lived.

By the Court.

The Defendant having violated the contract of hiring, must abide by the consequences. He ought not to be relieved from the payment of his bond, because he has thought proper to do an improper act.
#### McIntosh, Appellant, vs. Tax Commission and another, Respondents. [Two cases.]

*March 11*—

May *25, 1937.*

For the appellants there were briefs by , *Upham, Black, Russell & Richardson,*attorneys, and *Perry J. Stearns*and *Howard R.- Johnson*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Johnson.*

*73For the respondents there were briefs by the *Attorney General*and *L. E. Vaudreuil,*deputy attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Vaudreuil.*

The following opinion was filed April 7, 1937:

Wickhem, J.

For the years 1928 to 1932, inclusive, the taxpayers filed joint returns o.f income. Field audits were made in December, 1933, by the assessor of incomes. He separated the income of the wife, Anne H. McIntosh, appellant, 'from that of the husband, Charles J. McIntosh, appellant, and on the separate incomes made additional assessments aggregating $15,557.05 against Anne J. McIntosh, and found refunds aggregating $9,548.48 payable to Charles J. McIntosh. The taxpayers took proper proceedings to review this determination, and no question arises here as to the sufficiency of any of the procedural steps.

The issues presented upon these appeals are identical with those considered in *Amerpohl v. Tax Comm., ante,*p. 62, 272 N. W. 472, and the appeals are disposed of by the determination in that case.

*By the Court.*— Judgments affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $10 costs, on May 25, 1937.