Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices 88957 

Third Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Steel Wire Garment Hangers from 

the People’s Republic of China’’ (Issues and 

Decisions Memorandum), dated concurrently with 

these results and hereby adopted by this notice. 

8 Id. 

1See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and 

Rescission of Review, in Part; 2022, 89 FR 35790 

(May 2, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

3Commerce extended the time period for the final 

results to 180 days after the publication date of the 

Preliminary Results (i.e., October 29, 2024). 

However, because Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in this administrative review by seven 

days, the deadline is now November 5, 2024. See 

Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Final 

Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review, 2022,’’ dated July 26, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of 

Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic 

of China; 2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 17360 (April 19, 

2018); see also Certain Aluminum Foil from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court 

Decision Not in Harmony With the Amended Final 

Determination in the Countervailing Duty 

Investigation, and Notice of Amended Final 

Determination and Amended Countervailing Duty 

Order, 85 FR 47730 (August 6, 2020) (collectively, 

Order). 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review, 

including the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping in the event 

of revocation and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the Order 

were revoked, are addressed in the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.8 A list of topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://access.

trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on steel 

hangers from China would be likely to 

lead to the continuation or recurrence of 

dumping, and that the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail would be 

weighted-average dumping margins up 

to 187.25 percent. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to interested parties subject to 

an APO of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305. Timely notification of the 

return or destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and terms 

of an APO is a violation which is subject 

to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: November 5, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to 

Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–26177 Filed 11–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–054] 

Certain Aluminum Foil From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative; 2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies were provided 

to certain exporters/producers of certain 

aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) 

during the period of review (POR) 

January 1, 2022, through December 31, 

2022. 

DATES: Applicable November 12, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Natasia Harrison or Harrison Tanchuck, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1240 or 

(202) 482–7421, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 2, 2024, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results of this 

administrative review in the Federal 

Register and invited comments from 

interested parties.1 On July 22, 2024, 

Commerce tolled certain deadlines in 

this administrative proceeding by seven 

days.2 On July 26, 2024, Commerce 

extended the deadline for issuing these 

final results to November 5, 2024.3 For 

a complete description of the events that 

occurred since the Preliminary Results, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.4

Scope of the Order 5

The product covered by the scope of 

the Order is aluminum foil from China. 

A full description of the scope of the 

Order is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by the interested 

parties in their case and rebuttal briefs 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of topics discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is provided in Appendix 

I to this notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of comments 

from interested parties and the evidence 

on the record, we revised the 

calculation of the net countervailable 

subsidy rates for Hangzhou Five Star 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
88958 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices 

6See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

7With two respondents under examination, 

Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weightedaverage of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for 

the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of 

the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the 

examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average 

of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the 

examined respondents using each company’s 

publicly-ranged U.S. sale quantities for the 

merchandise under consideration. Commerce then 

compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate 

closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all 

other producers and exporters. See, e.g., Ball 

Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, 

Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final 

Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and 

Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 

(September 1, 2010). 

8Commerce finds the following companies to be 

to be cross-owned with Five Star: Jiangsu 

Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd. 

(Jiangsu Dingsheng), Dingsheng Aluminium 

Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Limited or 

Dingsheng Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) 

Trading Co., Ltd. (Dingsheng HK), Hangzhou 

Dingsheng Import & Export Co., Ltd. or Hangzhou 

Dingsheng Import and Export Co., Ltd. (Dingsheng 

IE), Hangzhou Teemful Aluminium Co., Ltd. 

(Teemful), Inner Mongolia Liansheng New Energy 

Material Co., Ltd. or Inner Mongolia Liansheng New 

Energy Material Joint-Stock Co., Ltd. (Liansheng), 

Inner Mongolia Liansheng New Energy Material 

Co., Ltd. or Inner Mongolia Xinxing New Material 

Co., Ltd. (Xinxing), Hangzou Dingsheng Industrial 

Group Co., Ltd. (Dingsheng Group), Hangzhou 

Dingcheng Aluminum Co., Ltd. (Dingcheng); 

Luoyang Longding Aluminium Co., Ltd. (Longding); 

Walson (HK) Trading Co., Limited (Walson HK); 

Dingheng New Materials Co., Ltd. (Dingheng) and 

Thai Ding Li New Materials Co., Ltd. (Ding Li), 

(collectively, Dingsheng Respondents). Longding, 

Walson HK, Dingheng and Ding Li were listed 

separately in the Initiation Notice. See Dingsheng 

Respondents’ Letter, ‘‘Hangzhou Five Star 

Affiliation Response,’’ dated August 25, 2023 

(Dingsheng Respondents AQR) at Exhibit A.1. 

9As discussed in the Preliminary Results, 

Commerce finds the following companies to be to 

be cross-owned with Zhongji HK: Jiangsu Zhongji 

Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (Zhongji) (FKA 

Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd.); 

Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd. 

(Jiangsu Huafeng); Shantou Wanshun New Material 

Group Co., Ltd. (Shantou Wanshun) (FKA Shantou 

Wanshun Package Material Stock Co., Ltd.); Anhui 

Zhongji Battery Foil Sci&Tech Co., Ltd. (Anhui 

Zhongji) (FKA Anhui Maximum Aluminium 

Industries Company Limited); and Sichuan 

Wanshun Zhongji Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd. 

(Sichuan Wanshun). Anhui Zhongji, Anhui 

Maximum Aluminium Industries Company 

Limited, Jiangsu Huafeng, Zhongji, and Shantou 

Wanshun Package Material Stock Co., Ltd. were 

listed separately in the Initiation Notice. 

10This net countervailable ad valorem subsidy 

rate reflects an EVA. See Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 3. 

11See Appendix II for a list of the non-selected 

companies under review. 

12The non-selected company rate reflects Five 

Star’s ad valorem net countervailable subsidy rate 

and Zhongji HK’s ad valorem net countervailable 

subsidy rate without the EVA. See Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at 4 and Comment 3. 

Aluminium Co., Ltd. (Five Star) and 

Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials 

Co., (HK) Limited (Zhongji HK). In 

addition, we have also revised the rate 

applicable to companies not selected for 

individual review. For a discussion of 

these changes, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For 

each of the subsidy programs found to 

be countervailable, we find that there is 

a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided 

financial contribution that gives rise to 

a benefit to the recipient, and that the 

subsidy is specific.6 For a complete 

description of the methodology 

underlying all of Commerce’s 

conclusions, including our reliance, in 

part, on facts otherwise available, 

including adverse facts available, 

pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of 

the Act, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not directly address the 

establishment of rates to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination where Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the 

Act. However, Commerce normally 

determines the rates for non-selected 

companies in reviews in a manner that 

is consistent with section 705(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides the basis for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation. Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of 

the Act instructs Commerce, as a general 

rule, to calculate an all-others rate equal 

to the weighted average of the 

countervailable subsidy rates 

established for exporters and/or 

producers individually examined, 

excluding any rates that are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available. 

There are 18 companies for which a 

review was requested and not 

rescinded, and which were not selected 

as mandatory respondents or found to 

be cross-owned with a mandatory 

respondent. In this review, the 

preliminary rates calculated for Five 

Star and Zhongji HK are above de 

minimis and not based entirely on facts 

available. Therefore, we are applying to 

the non-selected companies the simple 

average of the net subsidy rates 

calculated for Five Star and Zhongji 

HK.7

Final Results of Review 

We determine the following net 

countervailable subsidy rates exist for 

the period January 1, 2022, through 

December 31, 2022: 

Company Subsidy rate 

(percent ad valorem) 

Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd.8 .......................................................................................................................... 29.90 

Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., (HK) Limited 9 .................................................................................................. 10 22.35 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 11 ........................................................................................................................ 12 27.50 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose 

calculations and analysis performed for 

the final results of review within five 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce also intends to 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits 

of estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts shown above for the abovelisted companies with regard to 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of these final results of 

review. For all non-reviewed firms, we 

will instruct CBP to continue to collect 

cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties at the all-others 

rate or the most recent company-specific 

rate applicable to the company, as 

appropriate. These cash deposit 

requirements, effective upon 

publication of these final results, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Assessment Requirements 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(2), Commerce has 

determined, and CBP shall assess, 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices 88959 

13The Zhongji Respondents include Zhongji HK, 

Zhongji, Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminium Industry Co., 

Ltd. (Jiangsu Huafeng), Shantou Wanshun New 

Material Group Co., Ltd. (Shantou Wanshun), 

Anhui Zhongji Battery Foil Sci&Tech Co., Ltd. 

(Anhui Zhongji), and Sichuan Wanshun Zhongji 

Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd. (Sichuan Wanshun). 

entries covered by this review, for the 

above-listed companies at the applicable 

ad valorem assessment rates listed. 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after publication of the final results 

of this review in the Federal Register. 

If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

The final results are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: November 5, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

V. Subsidies Valuation 

VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Application of Adverse Inferences 

VII. Analysis of Programs 

VIII. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Continue to Make an Adverse Inference 

to Find that the Mandatory Respondents 

Benefited from the Export Buyer’s Credit 

Program (EBCP) 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise its Application of the Trading 

Company Methodology for Jiangsu 

Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., (HK) 

Ltd. (Zhongji HK) 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Grant Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination 

Materials Co., Ltd. (Zhongji) an Entered 

Value Adjustment (EVA) 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Include Non-Production Income and 

Commission Expenses in Zhongji’s Total 

Sales Denominator 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the Aluminum Plate and/or Sheet 

and Strip Benchmark for the Zhongji 

Respondents 13

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Include Warehouse Storage Fees in the 

Benchmark for the Government 

Provision of Primary Aluminum for Less 

Than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the Calculation of the Zhongji 

Respondents’ Inland Freight Used in the 

Primary Aluminum Benchmark 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should 

Include Certain Purchases Disclosed at 

Verification to calculate Anhui Zhongji’s 

Benefit from the Government Provision 

of Primary Aluminum for LTAR 

Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise the Dingsheng Respondents’ 

Intercompany Sales 

Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the Primary Aluminum, 

Aluminum Sheet and Coal Benchmarks 

for the Dingsheng Respondents 

Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should 

Include London Metal Exchange (LME) 

Data in the Calculation of the Primary 

Aluminum Benchmarks for the 

Dingsheng Respondents 

Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the Ocean Freight Benchmarks for 

the Dingsheng Respondents 

Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise the Dingsheng Respondents’ 

Benefit Calculations for Income Tax 

Deductions for Research and 

Development (R&D) Expenses Under the 

Enterprise Income Tax Law (EITL) 

Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust Dingsheng Respondents’ Benefit 

Calculation for the Government 

Provision of Electricity for LTAR 

Comment 15: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise Inner Mongolia Liansheng New 

Energy Material Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.’s 

(Liansheng’s) Benefit Calculation for 

Certain Government Grants 

IX. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

1. Alcha International Holdings Limited 

2. Baotou Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

3. Gra ̈nges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

4. Guangxi Baise Xinghe Aluminum Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

5. Hunan Suntown Marketing Limited 

6. Jiangyin Dolphin Pack Ltd. Co. 

7. Luoyang Longding Aluminium Industries 

Co., Ltd. 

8. Shandong Yuanrui Metal Material Co., Ltd. 

9. Shanghai Huafon Aluminium Corporation 

10. Shanghai Shenhuo Aluminium Foil Co., 

Ltd. 

11. Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials 

Co., Ltd. 

12. SNTO International Trade Limited 

13. Suntown Technology Group Corporation 

Limited 

14. Xiamen Xiashun Aluminium Foil Co. Ltd. 

15. Yangtai Jintai International Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

16. Yantai Donghai Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

17. Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd. 

18. Zhejiang Zhongjin Aluminum Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2024–26168 Filed 11–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

United States-Mexico-Canada 

Agreement (USMCA), Article 10.12: 

Binational Panel Review: Notice of 

Request for Panel Review 

AGENCY: United States Section, USMCA 

Secretariat, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of USMCA Request for 

Panel Review. 

SUMMARY: A Request for Panel Review 

was filed on behalf of the Coalition for 

Fair Mexican Exports of Aluminum 

Extrusions with the United States 

Section of the USMCA Secretariat on 

November 1, 2024, pursuant to USMCA 

Article 10.12. Panel Review was 

requested of the U.S. Department of 

Commerce’s Final Results in the matter 

of Aluminum Extrusions from Mexico: 

Final Affirmative Determination of Sales 

at Less than Fair Value. The USMCA 

Secretariat has assigned case number 

USA–MEX–2024–10.12–05 to this 

request. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vidya Desai, United States Secretary, 

USMCA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, 202–482–5438. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on October 3, 2024 (89 

FR 80463). 

Article 10.12 of Chapter 10 of USMCA 

provides a dispute settlement 

mechanism involving trade remedy 

determinations issued by the 

Government of the United States, the 

Government of Canada, and the 

Government of Mexico. Following a 

Request for Panel Review, a Binational 

Panel is composed to review the trade 

remedy determination being challenged 

and issue a binding Panel Decision. 

There are established USMCA Rules of 

Procedure for Article 10.12 (Binational 

Panel Reviews), which were adopted by 

the three governments for panels 

requested pursuant to Article 10.12(2) of 

USMCA which requires Requests for 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES