alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The following are signs of a medical emergency!

Abnormal thinking or behavior

Slurred speech 

Seizures

Loss of consciousness

Prevent Heat

Illness at Work

Outdoor and indoor heat exposure

can be dangerous.

First Aid for Heat Illness

New and returning workers need to build 

tolerance to heat (acclimatize) and take 

frequent breaks.

Follow the 20% Rule. On the first day, work 

no more than 20% of the shift’s duration at 

full intensity in the heat. Increase the 

duration of time at full intensity by no more 

than 20% a day until workers are used to

working in the heat.

Ways to Protect Yourself and Others

1 CALL 911 IMMEDIATELY

2 COOL THE WORKER RIGHT AWAY WITH WATER OR ICE

3 STAY WITH THE WORKER UNTIL HELP ARRIVES 

?

? ? ?? ?

Ease into Work. Nearly 3 out of 4 fatalities from heat 

illness happen during the first week of work.

Drink Cool Water 

Drink cool water even if you aren’t thirsty — at least 1 cup 

every 20 minutes.

Watch Out for Each Other

Monitor yourself and others for signs of heat illness.

Find Shade or a Cool Area

Take breaks in a designated shady or cool location.

Take Rest Breaks

Take enough time to recover from heat given the 

temperature, humidity, and conditions.

Dress for the Heat

Wear a hat and light-colored, loose-fitting, and breathable 

clothing if possible.

If Wearing a Face Covering 

Change your face covering if it gets wet or soiled. Verbally 

check on others frequently.

Watch for any other signs of heat illness 

and act quickly. When in doubt, call 911.

For more information: 

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov/heat

Federal law entitles you to a safe workplace. You 

have the right to speak up about hazards without 

fear of retaliation. See www.osha.gov/workers for 

information about how to file a confidential 

complaint with OSHA and ask for an inspection.

Take these actions:

Give cool water to drink

Remove unnecessary clothing 

Move to a cooler area

Cool with water, ice, or a fan 

Do not leave alone

Seek medical care

If a worker experiences:

Headache or nausea

Weakness or dizziness

Heavy sweating or hot, dry skin

Elevated body temperature

Thirst

Decreased urine output 

9-1-1

100%

20%

OSHA 4259-06 2023 | Nepali
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-4500

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO R. WOODS, a/k/a Toby,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:18-cr-00418-MGL-1)

Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hannah Rogers Metcalfe, METCALFE & ATKINSON, LLC, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellant. Benjamin Neale Garner, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio R. Woods pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to possession 

with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 

(b)(1)(C) (2018). The district court sentenced Woods to 151 months’ imprisonment. On 

appeal, Woods argues that the district court erred in designating him a career offender and 

in assigning a two-level enhancement to his offense level for maintaining a “stash house” 

under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(C)(2) (2018). The Government has 

moved to dismiss the appeal as barred by Woods’ waiver of the right to appeal included in 

his plea agreement. 

An appeal waiver “preclude[s] a defendant from appealing a specific issue if the 

record establishes that the waiver is valid and the issue being appealed is within the scope 

of the waiver.” United States v. Archie, 771 F.3d 217, 221 (4th Cir. 2014). A defendant 

validly waives his appeal rights if he agreed to the waiver “knowingly and intelligently.” 

United States v. Manigan, 592 F.3d 621, 627 (4th Cir. 2010). “To determine whether a 

waiver is knowing and intelligent, we examine the totality of the circumstances, including 

the experience and conduct of the accused, as well as the accused’s educational background 

and familiarity with the terms of the plea agreement.” United States v. Thornsbury, 670

F.3d 532, 537 (4th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted). “Generally, if a district 

court questions a defendant regarding the waiver of appellate rights during the [Fed. R. 

Crim. P.] 11 colloquy and the record indicates that the defendant understood the full 

significance of the waiver, the waiver is valid.” Id.
3

Our review of the Rule 11 colloquy and the plea agreement confirms that Woods

knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to appeal his sentence and that his claims fall 

squarely within the scope of the waiver. We therefore enforce the appellate waiver and 

grant the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
oxysure_ex10121.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.12.1




 


ADDENDUM TO


LOCK-UP AGREEMENTS







THIS ADDENDUM TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENTS (this “Addendum”) is made and entered into effective as of September 8, 2010 by and between OxySure Systems, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”) and all shareholders of the Company (the “Shareholder”).  The Company and Shareholders are sometimes referred to herein individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”


 


This Addendum to all lock-up agreements shall allow only the first 25% of the shares owned by each Shareholder to be sold during the period beginning the 1st day subsequent to our shares becoming publicly traded in a nationally recognized market and ending on the 90th day thereafter, and then 25% every 90 day period thereafter.


 


All other terms and conditions of the Lock-Up Agreements shall remain in full force and effect and said Addendum is hereby confirmed and ratified accordingly.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Chief Executive Officer has caused this Addendum to Lock-up Agreements to be executed as of the date first written above.












COMPANY

















___________________________________


By: Julian Ross


Its: Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12573]

                    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 7012 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2024 (Div. F, Pub. L. 118-47) (SFOAA); Executive Order 12163, as amended by Executive Order 13346; and Delegation of Authority 513, 1 hereby determine that targeted assistance to Zimbabwe in the areas of health, good governance and respect for human rights, education, leadership, agriculture/food security,                           ( print page 87927)                        poverty reduction, livelihoods, family planning and reproductive health, macroeconomic growth (including anti-corruption efforts), helping victims of trafficking and combatting trafficking, and advancing biodiversity and wildlife conservation, as well as the continuation of assistance that would have a significant adverse effect on vulnerable populations if suspended, is in the national interest of the United States. I thereby waive with respect to Zimbabwe the application of section 7012 of the FY 2024 SFOAA with respect to such assistance.                

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and, along with the accompanying memorandum of justification, shall be transmitted to Congress.                

Dated: August 28, 2024.

Richard R. Verma,

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-25687 Filed 11-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
Exhibit 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Jackelyn  Giroux,  President of  FoneFriend,  Inc ( the "Company" ), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three months
ended June 30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 19, 2003


                                            /S/ Jackelyn Giroux
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Jackelyn Giroux, President/Director
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 164 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1243]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
                  (Committees not listed did not meet)
  No committee meetings were held.
```
D1247 

Thursday, October 16, 2008 

Daily Digest 

Senate 

Chamber Action 

Senate met at 10:00:02 a.m. in pro forma session, 

and recessed at 10:00:30 a.m. until 3 p.m., on Monday, October 20, 2008. 

Committee Meetings 

(Committees not listed did not meet) 

ECONOMIC CRISIS 

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: 

Committee concluded a hearing to examine turmoil 

in the United States credit markets, focusing on the 

genesis of the current financial and economic crisis, 

after receiving testimony from Jim Rokakis, Cuyahoga County, Cleveland, Ohio; Arthur Levitt, Jr., 

Carlyle Group former Chairman, Securities and Exchange Commission, and Marc H. Morial, National 

Urban League, both of New York, New York; Eugene A. Ludwig, Promontory Financial Group, 

former Comptroller of the Currency, Department of 

the Treasury, Washington, DC; and Eric Stein, Center for Responsible Lending, Durham, North Caroh 

lina. 

House of Representatives 

Chamber Action 

The House was not in session today. The House 

is scheduled to meet at 11 a.m. on Saturday, January 

3, 2009, pursuant to the provisions of H. Con. Res. 

440. 

Committee Meetings 

U.S. ECONOMY—ROLE OF CREDIT 

DERIVATIVES 

Committee on Agriculture: On October 15, the Committee held a hearing to review the role of credit derivatives in the U.S. economy. Testimony was heard 

from Walter Lukken, Acting Chairman, CFTC; Erik 

R. Sirri, Director, Division of Trading and Markets, 

SEC; and public witnesses. 

f 

CONGRESSIONAL PROGRAM AHEAD 

Week of October 20 through October 25, 2008 

Senate Chamber 

To be announced. 

Senate Committees 

(Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated) 

To be announced. 

House Committees 

Committee on the Budget, October 20, hearing on Economy Recovery: Options and Challenges, 10 a.m., 210 

Cannon. 

Committee on Financial Services, October 21, hearing entitled ‘‘Regulatory Restructuring and Reform of the Financial System,’’ 10 a.m., 2128 Rayburn. 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, October 

22, hearing on Credit Rating Agencies and the Financial 

Crisis, 10 a.m., 2154 Rayburn. 

October 23, hearing on the Financial Crisis and the 

Role of the Federal Regulators, 10 a.m., 2154 Rayburn. 

October 24, Subcommittee on Domestic Policy, hearing on Gaming the Tax Code: The New York Yankees 

and City of New York Response to Questions about the 

new Yankee Stadium, 10 a.m., 2154 Rayburn. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with DIGEST
Exhibit 15.01  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (as
may be amended or supplemented) (File No. 333-130339) pertaining to the
Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited amended and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan and
the Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited Amended and Restated Incentives Share Purchase
Plan, the Registration Statement on Form F-10 pertaining to Agnico-Eagle
Mines Limited (as may be amended or supplemented) (File No. 333-138921),
our report dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited as of December 31, 2007 and our
report dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited which reports appear in
the December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form 20-F of Agnico-Eagle
Mines Limited.  Toronto,
  Canada
  ERNST &
  YOUNG LLPMarch 24,
  2008
  Chartered
  AccountantsLicensed
  Public Accountants   1
Exhibit
      32





OFFICER'S
      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002




In
      connection with the filing by Tix Corporation (the “Company”) of its Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the
“Quarterly Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Mitch
      Francis, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: August 18, 2007
            By:
            /s/
              MITCH FRANCISMitch
                FrancisChief
                  Executive Officer and
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
Form 10-KSB
Viking Systems, Inc.
File No. 000-49636



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Viking Systems,  Inc.(the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year  ended  December  31,  2004 as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report") for the purpose of complying  with
Rule  13a-14(b) or Rule  15d-14(b) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange  Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

     I, Joseph Warrino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

     1. the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Viking Systems,
Inc.


Dated:     March 30, 2005                  By:  /s/ Joseph Warrino
                                                Chief  Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.7

                                 David N. Salav
                                 31 Harbor Drive
                           Blue Point, New York 11715

                                                        April 13, 2001

PWR Systems, Inc.
3512 Veterans Memorial Highway
Suite 231
Bohemia, New York 11716

     Re:  Promissory Noted, dated January 10, 2001,
          of PWR Systems, Inc. in favor of David N. Salav

Ladies and gentlemen:

          The undersigned  hereby waives,  for the period commencing on the date
hereof and ending on  December  31,  2001,  any  payment of the  principal  and
interest due and owing to the undersigned pursuant to the referenced Promissory
Note.  Interest shall continue to accrue on such Note during the period covered
hereby.

                                                     Very truly yours,

                                                     /S/David N. Salav

                                                     David N. Salav

ACKNOWLEDGED:
PWR SYSTEMS, INC.

By: /s/ Vincent DiSpigno
   -----------------------------------------
    Name:  Vincent DiSpigno
    Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### State ex rel. Patch, Relator, vs. Circuit Court, Respondent.

*April 18*

May *20, 1941.*

*87
      *Samuel M. Pedrick*of Ripon, for the relator.

*Allan L. Bdgarton*of Fond du Lac, for the respondent.

Martin, J.

As heretofore stated, on the original appeal in *Barlow & Seelig Mfg. Co. v.*Patch, 232 Wis. 220, 286 N. W. 577, this court determined a single issue, namely, that the relator was the sole owner of the patent there in dispute, subject to plaintiffs’ shop rights. The judgment of the circuit court as entered on April 9, 1940, conforms to the mandate of this court on the appeal from the original judgment; that is, it declares null and of no effect the judgment of August 26, 1938, as amended December 3, 1938. It determines that relator is the absolute owner of patent No. 1,964,440, subject to the shop rights of the plaintiffs thereunder, and it awards costs and disbursements in his favor. It does not adjudge as to relator’s right of action against the plaintiffs under their bond, for damages, if any, which were sustained by reason of the temporary injunction.

The relator, in the present action, seeks to have other parts of the judgment of April 9, 1940, vacated and set aside, the bond, which was posted by the plaintiffs when the temporary injunction was issued, reinstated, and provision made for a hearing on the question of damages because of such injunc*88tion having been issued. The question of damages was not litigated in the original action. The decision and mandate of this court in the original action make no reference to the question of damages which the relator might have sustained by reason of the temporary injunction. Whatever right of action he might have against the plaintiffs on their bond furnished under the provisions of sec. 268.06, Stats., *at*the time the temporary injunction was issued, is not affected either by the mandate of this court on the original appeal, or by judgment of the circuit court of April 9, 1940.

After carefully considering the present state of the record in this litigation, we conclude that the writ should be denied. In so holding we are not foreclosing any right of action which the relator might have against the plaintiffs on their bond under secs. 268.06 and 268.07, Stats. See *Muscoda Bridge Co. v. Worden-Allen Co. 207*Wis. 22, 29, 239 N. W. 649, 240 N. W. 802.

*By the Court.*— Writ denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7494

JOHN E. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

DAVID JOHN LEWIS; EDDIE COHEN; ALFRED D.

LAMOUREAX; LEROY FRAZIER JONES; FREDDIE LEE

MOUZONE; CHARLIE THOMAS; KHALID ABDULLAH;

MICHAEL PELZER; LEVERN HENRY; HUSSEIN FNEICHE;

LEROY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiffs,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE; PARKER EVATT; WILLIAM D. CATOE;

GEORGE MARTIN; RALPH S. BEARSLEY; THOMAS R.

SMITH; SERGEANT PRITCHERD; SERGEANT ROACH, in

their individual and official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-584-0-17BD, CA-96-2967-0-17BD)

Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann,

ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Moore, No. CA96-584-0-17BD (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Katzer, by Guardian *ad litem,*Appellant, vs. The Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Mitchell Melnik*and *Gold & McCann,*all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: Shaw, *Muskat & Paulsen*'of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0516 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RAY ALLEN ROBERTS,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 21 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2024

09/13/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0516
HILLSBOROUGH,

APRIL TERM, 1791.

#### State *v.*Coulter.

A person entitled to a reward, offered by the General Assembly, on the conviction oí an offender, is a competent witness ag.iinst such offender.

Indictment for horse-sterling. — The General Assembly, at their last session, bud offered a reward to any person who would apprehend him, *to*he ¡laid upon conviction. Stokes .rpjit. hended him for sleaiing his horse j and *ou\*upon trial of ibe indictment for stealing this horse. Stoke*-, was offered as a witness on the part of the State ; and though it was strongly objected that he. ought not to be received, as it depended upon Coulter’s conviction whether he should be entitled to the reward promised by the General Assembly, and that he could not be entitled to it unless Coulter should he convicted. Yet *per curiam,*consisting of Spencer & Macay, be is a competent witness, and must be received : and he was received and gave evidence accordingly, and upon bis evidence Coulter was convicted, and received judgment *5of death, and was executed. Vide 2 *H. H. P.*C. 304, 280, 281.

Note. — Vide *Heward*v. *Shipley,*4 *East’s*Rep. 178.