alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mitcham Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.    Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.  Chief Executive Officer  December 14, 2004
1

Filed 12/27/23 P. v. Anguiano CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY

ANGUIANO

, Defendant and Appellant. A 166350

( Napa County Super. Ct.

No. 21 CR000719 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

In April 2021, two brothers

— Mike and Gary L.

— were in a car in a

Napa liquor store parking lot driving towards the exit when Christopher

Anthony Anguiano blocked their car with his truck. Anguiano got out of his

truck

, approached the brothers’ car, “pulled out a knife

, ” and swung it “ back

and forth” in front of them.

A jury convicted Anguiano of two counts of misdemeanor exhibiting

a deadly weapon

— one f or each brother ( § 417, subd

. (a)(1) ; counts 7 &

8)

— and other crimes , including felonie s. Various special allegations were

either admitted or found true . T he trial court imposed a prison term of four

1 We resolve this case by memorandum opinion, reciting only those

facts necessary to resolve the limited issue before us. (Cal. Stds. Jud. Admin.,

§ 8.1.) Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.2

years on the felon y convictions and associated special allegations. For each of

the two convictions for exhibiting a deadly weapon, the court ordered

concurrent time served in county jail

.

On appeal, Anguiano contends

— and the Attorney General

concedes

— one of the convictions for exhibitin g a deadly weapon should be

stricken

. 2 We agree. Ex hibiting or brandishing “ a deadly weapon in the

presence of another person is not a crime of violence ‘ upon ’ that person, but i s

committed in someone ’ s presence.

. . . Thus, a single act of brandishing can

only support a conviction of a single count of violation of section 417,

subdivision (a)(1), no matter how many people witness the act. ” ( In re Peter F.

(2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 877, 8 81 .) Here, Anguiano committed a sing le

violation of exhibiting a deadly weapon when he wi e lded a knife in the

presence of the brothers

.

Disposition

C ount 8 is stricken. The trial court is directed to amend the October 7,

2022 sentencing minute order reflecting th at count 8 is stricken

. As modified

,

the judgment is affirmed.

2 Anguiano does not contest any aspect of this case other than the two

misdemeanor convictions for brandishing.3 HIRAMOTO, J

. *

WE CONCUR:

BROWN, P. J.

GOLDMAN, J.

People v. Anguiano ( A16 6350 )

 Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa

, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the

California Constitution.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Verges, Appellant.

[771 NYS2d 897]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.), rendered November 16, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of vehicular assault in the second degree, operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and endangering the welfare of a child, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

*115The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence established defendant’s intoxication, and warranted the inference that he acted with criminal negligence *(see People v Givens,*268 AD2d 240 [2000], *lv denied*94 NY2d 947 [2000]; *People v Carkner,*213 AD2d 735 [1995], *lv denied*85 NY2d 970 [1995]).

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]). None of the convictions upon which the court permitted inquiry was too old for such purpose.

The court’s charge, viewed as a whole *(see People v Job,*87 NY2d 956 [1996]), provided the jury with appropriate guidance concerning the effect of defendant’s refusal to take sobriety tests, along with the surrounding circumstances.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.
**Exhibit 31(c)1**

**GEORGIA POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Michael D. Garrett, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Georgia Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 27, 2006

                  /s/Michael D. Garrett                  
Michael D. Garrett

President and Chief Executive Officer
QUICK CARDTM

Electrical Safety

Electrical hazards can cause burns, 

shocks and electrocution (death).

• Assume that all overhead wires are energized at 

deadly voltages. Never assume that a wire is safe to 

touch even if it is down or appears to be insulated.

• Never touch a fallen overhead power line. 

Call the electric utility company to report fallen 

electrical lines.

• Stay at least 10 feet (3 meters) away from 

overhead wires during cleanup and other 

activities. If working at heights or handling 

long objects, survey the area before starting 

work for the presence of overhead wires.

• If an overhead wire falls across your vehicle while 

you are driving, stay inside the vehicle and 

continue to drive away from the line. If the engine 

stalls, do not leave your vehicle. Warn people not 

to touch the vehicle or the wire. Call or ask 

someone to call the local electric utility company 

and emergency services.

• Never operate electrical equipment while you are 

standing in water.

• Never repair electrical cords or equipment unless 

qualified and authorized.

• Have a qualified electrician inspect electrical 

equipment that has gotten wet before energizing it.

• If working in damp locations, inspect electric cords 

and equipment to ensure that they are in good 

condition and free of defects, and use a ground-fault 

circuit interrupter (GFCI).

• Always use caution when working near electricity.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)

OSHA 4283-08 2023 | Electrical Safety (Korean)

For more information: 

Occupational

Safety and Health

Administration
전기 안전

전기 위험은 화상, 충격 및 

감전(사망)을 일으킬 수 있습니다.

• 모든 가공선로가 치명적인 전압으로 통전된다고 

가정하세요. 선로가 작동하지 않거나 절연된 것처럼 

보이는 경우에도 선로 접촉이 안전하다고 가정하지 

마십시오.

• 떨어진 가공 전력선을 만지지 마십시오. 전기 회사에 

연락해서 떨어진 전선을 신고하세요. 

• 청소 및 기타 작업 중에는 가공선로로부터 최소 

3m(10피트) 이상 떨어져 있어야 합니다. 높은 곳에서 

작업하거나 긴 물체를 취급하는 경우 작업을 시작하기 

전에 가공선로가 있는지 확인하세요.

• 주행 중에 차량이 가공선로에 걸려 넘어진 경우 차량 

내부에 머무른 채 계속 차량을 주행하여 선로를 

벗어나십시오. 엔진이 정지된 경우 차량을 떠나지 

마십시오. 사람들에게 차량이나 전선을 만지지 말라고 

경고하세요. 전화를 걸거나 누군가에게 지역 전기 

회사와 응급 서비스에 전화를 요청하십시오.

• 물 속에 있는 동안에는 절대 전기 장비를 작동하지 

마십시오.

• 승인이나 자격이 없는 경우 전기 코드 또는 장비를 

수리하지 마십시오,

• 전기 장비에 전원을 공급하기 전에 자격을 갖춘 전기 

기술자에게 젖은 전기 장비 검사를 맡기세요.

• 습기가 많은 곳에서 작업하는 경우 전기 코드와 장비를 

검사하야 상태가 양호하고 결함이 없는지 확인 후 접지 

고장 회로 차단기(GFCI)를 사용하십시오.

• 전기/전류 근처에서 작업할 떄는 항상 주의하십시오.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)

더 많은 정보는 여기에서:

산업안전

보건청

QUICK CARDTM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 164 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1243]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      CONGRESSIONAL PROGRAM AHEAD

                 Week of October 13 through October 18

                             Senate Chamber

  To be announced.

                           Senate Committees

        (Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated)
  To be announced.

                            House Committees

  Committee on Agriculture, October 15, hearing to review the role 
of credit derivatives in the U.S. economy, 11 a.m., 1300 Longworth.
```
AAM-11-331-E 

June 10, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10284 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0574 

Mr. Monte R. Myers 

Double M Helicopters, Inc. 

242 Pirates Loop, S.E. 

Mandan, ND 58554 

Dear Mr. Myers: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 19, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Double M Helicopters, Inc. (Double M) for an exemption from § 120.117(a)(2) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Double M, 

which is operating under separate parts of 14 CFR, to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one drug testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Double M. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 
2 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Double M Helicopters, Inc. an exemption from part 120 to 

the extent necessary to allow Double M, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Double M are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Double M part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M. D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10486]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            SUBMISSION OF CONCURRENT AND SENATE RESOLUTIONS

  The following concurrent resolutions and Senate resolutions were 
read, and referred (or acted upon), as indicated:

           By Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. McConnell):
       S. Res. 702. A resolution commending David J. Tinsley on 
     his service to the United States Senate; considered and 
     agreed to.
           By Mr. BAUCUS (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Ms. Cantwell, 
             Mr. Levin, Mr. Thune, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. 
             Roberts, Mr. Smith, Mr. Obama, Mr. Nelson of 
             Nebraska, Mr. Tester, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Coleman, Mr. 
             Reid, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Craig, Mr. 
             Wyden, Mr. Salazar, Mrs. Feinstein, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. 
             Feingold, and Mr. Enzi):
       S. Res. 703. A resolution designating November 2008 as 
     ``National Methamphetamine Awareness Month'', to increase 
     awareness of methamphetamine abuse; considered and agreed to.
           By Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Murray, and 
             Mr. Obama):
       S. Res. 704. A resolution congratulating the members of the 
     United States Olympic and Paralympic Teams on their success 
     in the 2008 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games and 
     supporting the selection of Chicago, Illinois, as the site of 
     the 2016 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games; considered and 
     agreed to.
           By Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself, Mr. Levin, and Mr. 
             Voinovich):
       S. Res. 705. A resolution expressing the sense of the 
     Senate on the commitment of the United States to the 
     preservation of religious and cultural sites and condemning 
     instances in which such sites are desecrated; considered and 
     agreed to.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SOUTHFIRST BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,625
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     36,946
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             553
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               553
<LOANS>                                        105,943
<ALLOWANCE>                                        615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,193
<DEPOSITS>                                     124,178
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,755
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,124
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,414
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 159,193
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,081
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  572
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,653
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,473
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,696
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              957
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       37
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    112
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        67
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.39
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,182
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   732
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      146
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  615
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               615
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>