alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: October 1, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC .. ' 

In The Matter Of: 

LOCAIR, INC., BRIAN L. HALL, 

RORY C. CREWS, and PEDRO E. BAEZ 

Respondents 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. OST-2013-0065 

(Enforcement Proceeding) 

{ : . 

ORDER POSTPONING CONFERENCE ON PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER 

On September 10,2013, an Order Setting Conference on Proposed Consent Order was 

filed. This Order set a telephone conference for October 3, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern time. 

As of Monday, September 30, 2013 (11 :59 p.m.), Congress had not passed an 

appropriations bill to continue funding government operations. As a result, the Office of 

Hearings is shut down until Congress acts to appropriate the necessary funds. 

Currently in this case, the next date for the parties to convene is set for October 18, 2013 

at 1:30 p.m. Eastern time. Therefore, the October 3, 2013 telephone conference at 11:00 a.m. 

Eastern time should be postponed until October 18, 2013. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The prehearing conference scheduled for October 3, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern time 

is postponed until October 18, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern time. 
ORDER SETTING CONFERENCE ON PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER 

Page 2 of 2 

2. In the event the shutdown is still in effect on October 18,2013, the October 18,2013 

telephone conference will be cancelled, without separate order, until further notice, 

when this office is reopened. 

Attachment: Service List 
Docket No. OST-2013-0065 

(Enforcement Proceeding) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Dockets Operations, M-30 

West Building, Ground Floor 

Room W12-10 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

ONE COPY 

Ms. Clereece Kroha 

Senior Trial Attorney 

Office of Aviation 

Enforcement and Proceedings, C-70 

U.S. Depatiment of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (W96-472) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9041 

Mr. Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counselfor 

Aviation and Enforcement Proceedings 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Judge J. E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Locair, Inc., Respondent 

c/o Mr. Pedro E. Baez 

27700 SW 164 Ave. 

Homestead, FL 33031 

Mr. Brian L. Hall, Respondent 

ChiefExecutive Officer, Locair, Inc. 

c/o Mr. Pedro E. Baez 

27700 SW 164 Ave. 

Homestead, FL 33031 

Mr. Rory C. Crews, Respondent 

President, Locair, Inc. 

c/o Mr. Pedro E. Baez 

27700 SW 164 Ave. 

Homestead, FL 33031 

Mr. Pedro E. Baez, Respondent & Agent for 

Service 

Vice President, Locair, Inc. 

27700 SW 164 Ave. 

Homestead, FL 33031 

TEL: 305-283-5468
www.osha.gov 

OSHA 4288-08 2023 Korean

(800) 321-OSHA (6742)

For more information: 

Occupational

Safety and Health

Administration

QUICK

CARDTM

Chainsaw Safety 

Operating a chainsaw can be hazardous. Potential 

injuries can be minimized by using proper personal 

protective equipment and safe operating procedures.

Before Starting a Chainsaw

• Check controls, chain tension, and all bolts and handles 

to ensure that they are functioning properly and that they 

are adjusted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 

• Make sure that the chain is always sharp and that the 

oil tank is full.

• Start the saw on the ground or on another firm 

support. Drop starting is never allowed.

• Start the saw at least 10 feet from the fueling area, with 

the chain’s brake engaged.

Fueling a Chainsaw 

• Use approved containers for transporting fuel to the saw.

• Dispense fuel at least 10 feet away from any sources 

of ignition when performing construction activities. 

No smoking during fueling.

• Use a funnel or a flexible hose when pouring fuel into 

the saw.

• Never attempt to fuel a running or HOT saw.

Chainsaw Safety

• Clear away dirt, debris, small tree limbs and rocks 

from the saw’s chain path. Look for nails, spikes or 

other metal in the tree before cutting.

• Shut off the saw or engage its chain brake when 

carrying the saw on rough or uneven terrain. 

• Keep your hands on the saw’s handles, and maintain 

balance while operating the saw.

• Proper personal protective equipment must be worn 

when operating the saw, which includes hand, foot, 

leg, eye, face, hearing and head protection.

• Do not wear loose-fitting clothing.

• Be careful that the trunk or tree limbs will not bind 

against the saw.

• Watch for branches under tension; they may spring 

out when cut.

• Gasoline-powered chainsaws must be equipped with a 

protective device that minimizes chainsaw kickback.

• Be cautious of saw kickback. To avoid kickback, do not 

saw with the tip. Keep tip guard in place.
체인톱 안전정보

체인톱 작동은 위험을 동반합니다. 적절한 개인 보호 장비와 

안전한 작동 절차를 이용하면 잠재적인 부상을 최소화할 수 

있습니다. 

체인톱 작동 전

• 컨트롤, 체인 장력 및 모든 볼트와 핸들이 제대로 작동하는지, 

제조업체의 지침에 따라 조정되었는지 확인합니다.

• 체인이 항상 날카롭고 오일 탱크가 가득 차 있는지 확인합니다.

• 톱을 땅이나 다른 단단한 지지대에서 작동시킵니다. 지지대 

없는 작동은 허용되지 않습니다.

• 체인의 브레이크가 걸린 상태에서 연료 공급 구역에서 최소 10

피트 떨어진 곳에서 톱을 시작합니다. 

체인톱 연료 공급 

• 연료를 충전하기 위해 승인된 용기를 사용합니다.

• 시공 작업을 할 때 점화원으로부터 최소 10피트 이상 떨어진 

곳에서 연료를 분사합니다. 연료 공급 중에 흡연을 하지 마세요.

• 연료를 주입할 때는 깔때기 또는 유연한 호스를 사용하십시오.

• 작동 중이거나 뜨거운 톱에 연료를 공급하지 마십시오.

체인톱 안전 정보 

• 톱의 체인 경로에서 먼지, 잔해, 작은 나무 가지 및 바위를 

치웁니다. 나무를 자르기 전에 나무에 못, 가시, 또는 기타 금속이 

있는지 확인합니다.

• 험하거나 울퉁불퉁한 지형에서 톱을 운반할 때는 톱을 끄거나 

체인 브레이크를 작동시킵니다. 

• 톱의 손잡이에 손을 대고, 톱을 작동하는 동한 균형을 

유지합니다.

• 톱을 작동할 때는 손, 발, 다리, 눈, 얼굴, 청력 및 머리 보호는 

포함한 적절한 개인 보호 장비를 착용합니다.

• 헐렁한 옷을 입지 마십시오.

• 나무 줄기나 가지가 톱에 붙지 않도록 주의하십시오.

• 가지가 팽팽하게 당겨지는 것을 주의하십시오. 자르면 튀어나올 

수 있습니다.

• 가솔린 동력 체인톱에는 체인톱 킥백을 최소화 하는 보호 

장치가 장착되어야 합니다.

• 톱 킥백에 주의하십시오. 킥백을 방지하려면 톱의 끝으로 자르지 

마십시오. 톱의 끝 가드를 제자리에 유지하세요.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)

더 많은 정보는 여기에서:

산업안전

보건청

QUICK

CARDTM
Instrucciones del compromiso de seguridad del 

trabajador 

Este compromiso es para uso de las empresas que se han registrado en la semana sano y 

salvo (Safe + Sound Week, en inglés). Si no se ha registrado, comprométase en 

osha.gov/safeandsoundweek. 

Puede usar este compromiso en un evento de firma o compartir fotos de sus compromisos 

completados en las redes sociales. Use #SanoYSalvoEnElTrabajo para etiquetar sus fotos. 
Firma Fecha
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2300-E2301]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    CONGRESSIONAL RECOGNITION FOR MILITARY ADVISORY COUNCIL MEMBERS

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. GABRIELLE GIFFORDS

                               of arizona

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Ms. GIFFORDS. Madam Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to five 
retired United States Generals who, for the past two years, have served 
as members of my Military Advisory Council.
  These distinguished Americans have served the Nation as leaders of 
our Armed Forces. They continue their service in our community. I am 
fortunate to have the benefit of their advice on military affairs.
  As a member of the House Armed Services Committee, I have often 
turned to my Military Advisory Council as we considered legislation and 
appropriations to meet the needs of our Armed Forces. I have benefited 
immeasurably from their knowledge and experience.
  I commend them for their commitment to our men and women in uniform 
and thank them for making their expertise available to me. They are: 
General John Wickham Jr., former Chief of Staff, United States Army, 
General Donald Shepperd, former Director, Air National Guard, General 
John Cronin, former Deputy Commander, Fleet Marine, General Bill Van 
Dyke, former Adjutant General, Arizona National Guard, and General 
Ronald Shoopman, former Commander Arizona 162nd Fighter Wing.

[[Page E2301]]

  They all have proven themselves to be true patriots. It has been my 
privilege to have them as advisors on military issues. On behalf of our 
Armed Forces I thank them for their continued service.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 175 (Monday, November 17, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Pages D1276-D1277]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      CONGRESSIONAL PROGRAM AHEAD

             Week of November 18 through November 22, 2008

                             Senate Chamber

  On Wednesday, Senate will resume consideration of the motion to 
proceed to consideration of S. 3297, to advance America's priorities.
  During the balance of the week, Senate may consider any cleared 
legislative and executive business.

                           Senate Committees

        (Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated)
  Committee on Armed Services: November 18, closed business meeting 
to consider pending nominations and to consider and approve the 
report of the Committee's inquiry into the treatment of detainees in 
U.S. custody, 4 p.m., SR-222.
  Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: November 18, to 
hold hearings to examine the state of the domestic automobile 
industry, 3 p.m., SD-538.
  November 19, Full Committee, to hold hearings to examine the 
nomination of Neil M. Barofsky, of New York, to be Special Inspector 
General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program of the Treasury, 9:30 
a.m., SD-538.
  Committee on the Budget: November 19, to hold hearings to examine 
the economic outlook and options for stimulus, 10 a.m., SD-608.
  Committee on Finance: November 19, to hold hearings to examine 
health care reform, focusing on the economic perspective, 10 a.m., 
SD-215.
  Committee on the Judiciary: November 19, to hold hearings to 
examine helping families stay in their homes, focusing on the role 
of bankruptcy laws, 10 a.m., SH-216.

                            House Committees

  To be announced.

*These figures include all measures reported, even if there was no 
accompanying report. A total of 265 reports have been filed in the 
Senate, a total of 407 reports have been filed in the House.

[[Page D1277]]
```
City of tflisaCia Office of the 9dayor 

425 'East OaftJ/..venue, Ste. 301, o/isa{ia, CJL 93291 IJ'e{: (559) 713-4512 Pax:; (559) 713-4800 

Steven A. Nelsen January 8, 2015 

Mayor 

E. Warren Gubler 

Vice Mayor 

Gregory F. Collins 

Council member 

Bob Link 

Council member 

Amy Shuklian 

Councilmember 

Scott Faulk 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket OST-2004-19916 

Dear Mr. Faulk: 

,,,;.:.) 

City Council Members, at their meeting on January 5, 2015, discussed the transition 

of service from Great Lakes to SeaPort Airlines. As part of that discussion, Council was 

asked to consider a request from SeaPort to change the service pattern proposed at 

Visalia. Council weighed the benefits of each airport, Oakland and Sacramento, and 

formally adopted a motion "Authorizing the Mayor to sign a letter, to the Department of - , 

Transportation, supporting SeaPort's request for a Change of Service Pattern that would 

provide Visalia with service to Sacramento instead of Oakland." 

For many years now, the City Council has inquired with various air carriers about 

the possibility of having service to our state capitol. Up until now, the Rates & Fees 

structure at SMF has been cost prohibitive. When the City was notified that SMF was now 

an option, our City Council was compelled to review the proposal. 

Not only would service to Sacramento represent the only Central Valley service to 

the state capitol, SMF has service by both American and United, two legacy carriers that do 

not have a presence at OAK. Historically, Visalia travelers have been primarily business 

travelers. Having the two (2) additional carriers would only enhance the viability of 

business travel out of Visalia. 

SeaPort continues to work with Visalia to provide the service that we believe has 

the best chance of success. We urge the department to approve the request for service 

pattern change as soon as possible in hopes that SeaPort can commence service on 

February 9, 2015. 

The City of Visalia appreciates the Essential Air Service program and the 

opportunity it offers the community to continue to have air service. Providing air service is 

an important aspect of our economic development efforts, and is also key to our long-term 

alternative transportation and air quality objectives. 

Respectfully, 

Steve Nelsen 

Mayor
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF OCTOBER 29, 2000 AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED OCTOBER 29, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-29-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-29-2000
<CASH>                                         839,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    423,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,443,881
<PP&E>                                      10,711,975
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,383,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,941,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,833,061
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,602
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,393,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,941,345
<SALES>                                      5,051,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,101,234
<CGS>                                        1,073,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,981,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,447
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,447
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  April 11, 2008
    /s/ Lynn R. BlodgettLynn R. Blodgett, President andChief Executive Officer ofAffiliated Computer
Services, Inc.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 12, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133817 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan COLLEEN J. RUDD, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133817 COA: 266633 WCAC: 04-000094 BEDFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERS E the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REINSTATE the decision of the Work ers’ Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC). The Court of Appeals clearly erre d by failing to affirm the decision of the WCAC, where that decision was supporte d by the record. MCL 418.861a(14); Mudel v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co, 462 Mich 691 (2000).

t0905 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 12, 2007

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                        Alabama National BanCorporation
                 Computation of Earnings Per Share (Unaudited)
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
                   ----------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Per Share
                                                             Income   Shares     Amount
                                                             ------   ------     ------
<S>                                                         <C>       <C>       <C>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
Basic EPS net income...................................     $ 5,903   11,065     $ 0.53
                                                                                 ======
Effect of dilutive securities options..................           -      153
                                                            -------   ------
Diluted EPS............................................     $ 5,903   11,218     $ 0.53
                                                            =======   ======     ======

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
Basic EPS net income...................................     $ 5,380   11,100     $ 0.48
                                                                                 ======
Effect of dilutive securities options..................           -      167
                                                            -------   ------
Diluted EPS............................................     $ 5,380   11,267     $ 0.48
                                                            =======   ======     ======

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
Basic EPS net income...................................     $11,561   11,066     $ 1.04
                                                                                 ======
Effect of dilutive securities options..................           -      146
                                                            -------   ------
Diluted EPS............................................     $11,561   11,212     $ 1.03
                                                            =======   ======     ======

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
Basic EPS net income...................................     $10,399   11,061     $ 0.94
                                                                                 ======
Effect of dilutive securities options..................           -      175
                                                            -------   ------
Diluted EPS............................................     $10,399   11,236     $ 0.93
                                                            =======   ======     ======
</TABLE>
#### The Chairman of the Court *v*. Moore’s administrator and others.

, From Hertford.

All action can be maintained on an administration bond, against the securities, before judgment has been obtained against the adminis-istrator. An action lies against the securities as soon as the administrator forfeits his bond, and a person be thereby “ *injured,”*for

The act of 1791, ch. 10, directs, that administration bonds shall be made payable to the Chairman of the County Court and his successors in office, C-c. and shall be put in suit in the name of the Chairman, at the instance of the person injured.

This case was sent up to this Court from the Superior Court of Lav/ for Hertford County, upon a rule obtained by the Plaintiff to shew cause why a new trial should not be granted. The action was brought upon an administration bond, against EH Moore, administrator of the estate of AYf’iis Moore, deceased, and against his securities *i*and the question submitted to this Court was, whether an action can be maintained on an administration bond, against the securities of the administrator, before a judgment has been obtained against the administrator himself *i*

Ham, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The act of 1715, ch, 48, directs that all administration bonds shall he made payable to the Governor, &c. who is directed to transfer or assign thenr4 *to any person*injured,’ who may maintain an action thereon. No part of the act seems to require that the person injured should prove his injury by the record of a judgment obtained by him against the administrator. Although the administrator might have forfeited his bond, yet the Plaintiff was not entitled to recover any thing of his securities, unless proof was made, according to the act, that he the Plaintiff was a *person injured.*The act of 1791, ch. 10, directs, that in future, administration bonds shall be *23made payable to the Chairman of the County Court and his successors in ofB.ce, &c. and shall be put in suit in the name of the Chairman, at the instance of the *person injured.*Under this act, (and the bond in question was given since this act passed) no recovery can be had in the name of the Chairman, unless, in addition to the proof that the administrator has forfeited his bond, proof is also made, that the party for whose benefit the suit is brought, has been injured by such forfeiture. It is contended, however, that Ibis should be shewn by obtaining judgment against the administrator: if so, it will follow, that this judgment would be good evidence against, and obligatory upon the securities, although it be a proceeding *“ inter alios acta*and the Defendants, if permitted, might have it in their power to shew that the real Pláintiíf had sustained no injury. Upon this point the Court gives no opinion ; but they are of opinion that the whole matter may be enquired into in this action *;*that the acts of Assembly are plain, and require no previous judgment, to be recovered against the administrator, to render his securities liable to the suit of the person injured. Let the rule for a new trial be made absolute.