alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Date .

Calibrator .

Ambient Temperature, of .

Barometric Press. (in. Hg) .

Thermocouple ID Number.. .

Reference Thermometer Serial Number. .

12/8/2009

DJSi.JB

60

29.87

Probe 42

7238

Reference Point

Reference

Thermocouple Temperature

Thermometer Difference(a) Potentiometer Pass/Fail 

, 

Temperature, % of

PASS Warm0.70 Water 104.0 108.0 %

Boiling Water 214.0 210.0 PASS 0.60 %

Hot PASSPeanut 0.90 420.0 428.0 Oil %

(a) [((Ref. Temp., OR) _ (Test Thermocouple Temp., °R))/ Ref Temp., °R]* I00, where oR = of + 460.

Temperature difference must be < 1.50 %.

Date

if'

• '__ -·~I

""
Date .

Calibrator .

Ambient Temperature, of .

Barometric Press. (in. Hg) .

Thermocoup 1e ID Number .

Reference Thermometer Serial Number. .

12/8/2009

DJS/.JB

60

29.87

Probe 48

7238

Reference Point

Reference

Thermocouple Temperature

Source Thermometer Difference(a) Potentiometer Pass/Fail ,

Temperature, % of

Warm Water 93.087.0 PASS 1.10%

Boiling Water 209.0 209.0 PASS 0.00 %

Hot PASSPeanut 0.00 446.0 446.0 Oil %

(a) [((Ref. Temp., OR) _ (Test Thermocouple Temp., °R))/ Ref. Temp., °R]*IOO, where oR = of + 460.

Temperature difference must be < 1.50 %.

Signature Date
Date .

Calibrator. .

An1bient Temperature, of .

Barometric Press. (in. Hg) .

Thermocouple ID Number. .

Reference Thermometer Serial Number. .

12/8/2009

DJS/JB

60

29.87

Probe 68

7238

Reference Point

Reference

Thermocouple Temperature

Source Thermometer Difference(a) Po ten ti0meter Pass/Fail ,

Temperature, % of

Warm Water 108.0 105.0 PASS 0.53 %

Boiling Water 215.0 211.0 PASS 0.60 %

Hot Peanut435.0425.0 Oil PASS 1.13%

(a) [((Ref. Temp., OR) - (Test Thermocouple Temp., °R))/ Ref. Temp., °R]*l 00, where oR = of + 460.

Temperature difference must be < 1.50 %.

Signatur~~

Date
|JENNIFER C. ANDERSON

Jennifer C. Anderson         |  | D. WILLIAM HAGAN

D. William Hagan
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|RICHARD F. BAALMANN, JR.

Richard F. Baalmann, Jr. |  | HOWARD J. JUNG

Howard J. Jung    
|ERIC R. BIBENS II

Eric R. Bibens II               |  | RICHARD A. KARP

Richard A. Karp  
|JAMES T. GLENN

James T. Glenn                     |  | RICHARD W. STINE

Richard W. Stine
|DANIEL L. GUST

Daniel L. Gust                     |  | DAVID S. ZIEGLER

David S. Ziegler
DATOS 

RÁPIDOS

Pictograma para la norma sobre 

la comunicación de peligros

La norma de comunicación de peligros (HCS, por sus 

siglas en inglés) exige pictogramas en las etiquetas para 

advertir a los usuarios de los peligros químicos a los que 

puedan estar expuestos. Cada pictograma representa un 

peligro definido y consiste en un símbolo sobre un fondo 

blanco enmarcado con un borde rojo. La clasificación 

del peligro químico determina el pictograma que 

muestra la etiqueta.

Pictogramas y peligros según la HCS

Peligro para la salud 

• Carcinógeno

• Mutagenicidad

• Toxicidad para la 

 reproducción

• Sensibilización 

 respiratoria

• Toxicidad especifica

 de órganos diana

• Peligro por 

 aspiración

 Llama 

• Inflamables

• Pirofóricos

• Calentamiento 

 espontáneo

• Desprenden gases 

 inflamables

• Reaccionan 

 espontáneamente 

 (autorreactivas)

• Peróxidos orgánicos

 Signo de exclamación

• Irritante (piel y ojos)

• Sensibilizador cutáneo

• Toxicidad aguda

 (dañino)

• Efecto narcótico

• Irritante de vías 

 respiratorias

• Peligros para la capa

 de ozono (no obligatorio)

 Botella de gas 

• Gases a presión

 Corrosión 

• Corrosión o 

 quemaduras 

 cutáneas

• Lesion ocular

• Corrosivo para los

 metales

 Bomba explotando

• Explosivos

• Reaccionan 

 espontáneamente 

 (autorreactivas)

• Peróxidos orgánicos

Llama sobre círculo 

• Comburentes

 

 Medio ambiente 

 (No obligatorio) 

 

• Toxicidad acuática

 Calavera y 

 tibias cruzadas 

• Toxicidad aguda 

 (mortal o tóxica)

Departamento de Trabajo 

de los EE. UU.

Para más información:

Administración de

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional
Tractor incidents are the leading cause of death and injury 

on farms. Farmworkers are especially at risk from rollovers, 

tipping and highway incidents.

Employers and supervisors should take steps to ensure a 

safe work environment by providing:

• Safe and adequately maintained equipment

• Proper supervision and training

• An Emergency Action Plan (i.e., each vehicle with a

first‐aid kit and fire extinguisher)

To Prevent Injuries, Train Workers to:

• Inspect farm vehicles for safety guards, seat belts and

rollover protection structure (ROPS) before driving.

• Check that the Slow Moving Vehicle (SMV) emblem is

clean, visible and not faded.

• Avoid traveling at night and during

bad weather or low visibility.

• Watch traffic patterns, obey speed

limits and avoid highways during

busy travel times.

• Use the tractor’s platform to enter

and exit.

• Be aware of overhead power lines, people, and uneven

ground.

• Carry passengers only when there is appropriate seating

with seat belts.

• Take extra precautions when driving on steep slopes

and downhill.

• Always shut down the tractor before climbing down.

Safe Work Practices

• On highways, farm vehicles should display flashing

lights and reflectors, or consider escort vehicles.

• Provide workers with emergency phone numbers and

the address of the closest hospital.

Protecting Farmworkers from 

Tractor and Harvester Hazards

OSHA 3706-07 2014

QUICK

CARDTM

U.S. Department of Labor
# CA2005218EN.01000101.xml

| 6.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 218/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 218/1

---

Publication of a vacancy for

DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR

(Grade A*14)

(Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2005/10003

(2005/C 218 A/01)

The Commission is seeking to appoint a Director for the Institute for Health and Consumer Protection of the Directorate-General Joint Research Centre in Ispra (Italy).

Full job descriptions, selection criteria and application details can be found at

Full job descriptions, selection criteria and application details can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

The senior official will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*14 grade officials of the European Communities. The Commission applies an equal opportunities policy.

To be eligible candidates must: - be a citizen of a European Union Member State; - hold a university degree that gives access to undertake doctoral studies; - have at least 15 years' postgraduate professional experience at a level to which the qualifications referred to above give admission, including at least five years at a high management level; - have a thorough knowledge of one of the official languages of the European Union and an adequate knowledge of another of these official languages.

If you want to apply, you must register via the Internet by going to the website

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html

and follow the instructions concerning the various stages of the procedure. Please note that you must have an e-mail address; this will be used to identify your registration.

The closing date for registration is 6 October 2005. On-line registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.

6 October 2005

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
condensed  financial  statements for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

(All figures in thousands except per share amounts.)

</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         465
<SECURITIES>                                   526
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                   903
<INVENTORY>                                    422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,986
<PP&E>                                         312
<DEPRECIATION>                                 166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,635
<BONDS>                                        58
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,784
<SALES>                                        1,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,688
<CGS>                                          387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               181
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,629)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,629)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.80)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10(a)20**

**FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHERN COMPANY**

**DEFERRED CASH COMPENSATION TRUST AGREEMENT FOR DIRECTORS**

**OF SOUTHERN COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES**

**WHEREAS,** the Grantors adopted the Southern Company Deferred Cash Compensation Trust Agreement for Directors of Southern Company and its Subsidiaries (“Trust”) amended and restated effective September 1, 2001; and

**WHEREAS**, the Grantors desire to amend the Trust in order to ascertain compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code; and

**WHEREAS,** under Section 4 of the Trust, the Grantors have the authority to amend the Trust. 

**NOW, THEREFORE,** effective as of January 1, 2009, the Grantors hereby amend the Trust as follows:

**1.**

|   | Section 7 is amended by adding the following Section 7(i) to the end thereof. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Notwithstanding the provisions in this Section 7 or any other provision of the Trust, the dispute resolution provisions shall at all times be administered to be in compliance with Section 409A of the Code and any provision determined by the Trustee to be non-compliant should be disregarded and the Trustee shall take a similar action which the Trustee reasonably believes is compliant with Section 409A of the Code.  With respect to the obligation in the Trust to reimburse a Beneficiary for legal fees or any other expenses or assessments (“Expenses”), the following requirements shall apply:  All reimbursements of Expenses under the Trust will be for Expenses incurred during Beneficiary’s lifetime.  Reimbursement will be made within ten (10) days following the date Beneficiary submits an invoice for Expenses.  In no event shall the payments by the Company under the Trust bemade later than the end of the calendar year next following the calendar year in which such Expenses were incurred, provided, that the Participant shall have submitted an invoice for such Expenses at least ten (10) days before the end of the calendar year next following the calendar year in which such Expenses were incurred.  In no event will the amount of Expenses reimbursed in one year affect the amount of Expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind benefit to be provided, to Beneficiary in any other taxable year and the Beneficiary’s right to have the Trust pay such Expenses may not be liquidated or exchanged for any other benefits.

**2.**

Except as amended herein by this First Amendment, the Trust shall remain in full force and effect as adopted by the Grantors prior to the adoption of this First Amendment.

 

----
Department of Environmental Quality 

### 1274425 - R8SDMS

Amanda Smith Executive Director 

### State ofUtah DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION GARY R. HERBERT Governor
GREG BELL LieutenantGovernor Brent H. Everett Director ERRC-114-13 August 20,2013

Bill Murray Superfund Program Director U.S. EPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop 8EPR-PS Denver Colorado 80202-1129
Re: National Priorities List (NPL)Deletion Midvale SlagSite

The Utah Department of Environment of Quality, Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) has reviewed your July 16, 2013, letter requesting concurrence with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) proposal to delete the Midvale Slag Site from the NPL. In addition to your letter, the DERR also reviewed the draft Notice ofIntent to Delete and concurs with EPA'sproposal to deletethe Midvale SlagSite from theNPL. Ifyou should have any questions regarding the DERR's concurrence, please contact Tony Howes at 801-536-4283.

BHE/TH/pd

cc: Tony Howes, Division ofEnvironmental Response and Remediation Hans Millican, Division ofEnvironmental Response and Remediation Ema Waterman,U.S. EPA, Region 8 Philip Hill, Midvale City John Jacobson, Midvale City Sincerely,

Brent H. Everett, Division Director Division ofEnvironmental Response and Remediation

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City. UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144840• Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4840 Telephone (801) 536-4100• Fax (801) 359-8853 •T.D.D. (801) 536-4414 www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper
NUMBER 13-08-00318-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOSE REYNA DEL TORO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 139th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on August 27, 2010, because the appellant’s 

brief had not been timely filed. Appellant, Jose Reyna del Toro, by and through his 

attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to 

prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). 
2

Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant 

to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed 

the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our 

mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the 7th

day of October, 2010.
#### T. S. ROYSTER, Adm’r, v. H. H. BURWELL and others.

*Appeal.*

An appeal will be dismissed where there is no statement of the case and no bond with proper justification filed within the time allowed by law.

*(Adams*v. Reeres, 74 N. C., 106; *Bryson*V. *Lucas,*S5 N. C., 397; *Sever*v. *McLauchlin,*82 N. C., 332, cited and approved).

Civil A.ctioN tried at Fall Term, 1883, of Granville Superior Court before *MacRae, J.*

The defendants appealed from the judgment of the court below, and the plaintiff moved in this court to dismiss the appeal.

*25
      *Mr. T. B. Venable,*for plaintiff.

No counsel for defendants.

Ashe, J.

There was judgment in behalf of the plaintiff. *41*From which judgment-defendants appealed to the supreme court; notice waived; bond in the sum of $25 adjudged sufficient; by consent, defendants allowed till Vance superior court to file bond and make up case.” This entry on the record is signed by the judge presiding.

No statement of the ease on appeal accompanies the record. The bond sent up is without justification and was not filed until after Vance court. Upon these grounds the plaintiff’s counsel moved in this court to dismiss the appeal, and the motion is sustained. *Adams*v. *Reeves,*74 N. C., 106; *Smith*v. *Abrams,*at this term ; *Bryson*v. *Lucas,*85 N. C., 397; *Sever*v. *McLaughlin,*82 N. C., 332., The Code, §560, and the numerous cases there cited.

Appeal dismissed.
August 2, 2013

Ms. Gina McCarthy Admiriistrator L.I.S. Environi-nent Protection Agency 1200 Pemisylvania Avenue, N.W. Washingtoii, D.C. 20460

Dear Adi-ninistrator McCarthy:

I write today regarding the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed rule amending 40 CFR Paits 280 and 281; Revisions to Existing Requirements and New Requirements for Secondary Containment and Operator Training (EPA—flQ—UST-201 1-0301). Currently, there are significant discrepancies between the compliance cost estimates that EPA has calculated and those estimated by the affected businesses. I'he industry estimates the annual average compliance costs for a typical filling station to exceed $6,000, considerably more than the $900 average amount estimated by the EPA. I consider this difference to be of sufficient magnitLide to deserve additional scrutiny and consideration as you continue this rulemaking action.

As we know, small businesses are a vital sector of our economy, accepting considerable risks to provide valuable services and products, to create jobs, and to contribute to their communities in ways small and large. Similarly, protecting the environment and ensuring clean drinking water are also important to our economy and to the health of our citizens. So that I can better understand liow you intend to balance these complementary goals, I would like additional informatioii regarding the differences in compliance cost estimates and how you will account for those in your rulemaking. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincercly,

'I'om flarkin United States Senator
#### Schultz, Administrator, Respondent, vs. Spain and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Lockney, Lowry & Hunter*of Wau-kesha.

For the respondent: *Harold W. Hartwig*of Watertown, attorney, and *George A. Hartman*of Juneau of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25280]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 516 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-137, K2025-135.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-25280 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10646]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair will entertain up to 10 requests 
for 1-minute speeches on each side of the aisle.

                          ____________________
```
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

9 August 2004

(2004/C 202/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
**Exhibit 23(a)**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-00395, File No. 333-86056 and File No. 333-119926) and Forms S-8 (File No. 33-27869, File No. 33-46641, File No. 33-48505, File No. 333-26111,File No. 333-45107 and File No. 333-84170) of Energen Corporation of our report dated February 27, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Birmingham, Alabama 

February 27, 2007
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mitcham Industries, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.
Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
June 13, 2005