alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10768]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            DR. WALTER CARL GORDON, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING

  Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate 
proceed to the immediate consideration of H.R. 6859, which is at the 
desk.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       A bill (H.R. 6859) to designate the facility of the United 
     States Postal Service located at 1501 South Slappey Boulevard 
     in Albany, Georgia, as the ``Dr. Walter Carl Gordon, Jr. Post 
     Office Building.''

  There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill.
  Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the bill be 
read three times and passed, the motion to reconsider be laid upon the 
table, with no intervening action or debate, and any statements 
relating thereto be printed in the Record.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The bill (H.R. 6859) was ordered to a third reading, was read the 
third time, and passed.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Canterbury ParkHolding Corporation (the “Company”) herby certify that:

 

(1)          The accompanying quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2010 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained inthe accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                                                                                                | **CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING CORPORATION**     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                |                                        |
| Dated:             August 16, 2010 | /s/ Randall D. Sampson                      |
|                                                                                                | Randall D. Sampson,                         |
|                                                                                                | President, and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                                                                                |                                        |
| Dated:             August 16, 2010 | /s/ David C. Hansen                         |
|                                                                                                | David C. Hansen,                            |
|                                                                                                | Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer |

 

24

----
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J A M ES TI M O TH Y H A Y ES, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 30071 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 4 - c r - 0 0 1 3 4 - PA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon O w e n M . P a nne r , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , T A L L M A N , an d B E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a m e s T i m othyH a y e s appe a l s f r om the e i ght - m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d upon r e voc a t i on of

s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a n d w e a f

f i rm. 

# FI LED OC T 28 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 30071 2 H a y e s c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e d b yc o n s id e r in g le g a lly i m pe rm i s s i bl e f

a c t or s w he n i m pos i ng the s e nt e nc e . T he r e c or d r e f l e c t s tha tthe d i s tr i c tc o u rtc o n s i d e r e d th e ap p r o p r i a t e s e n t e n c i n g f a c t o r s u n d e r1 8 U . S. C. § 3 58 3(e) and w as sanct i on i ng H ay es for “ brea ch of trust . ” See U ni ted States v. Mi qb el , 44 4 F . 3d 11 73 , 11 76 , 11 81 -82 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). H a y e s a ls o c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o c e d u r a llye rr e d b yf a ilin g to pr ovi de a n a de qua t e s t a t e m e ntof r e a s ons f

orthe s e nt e nc e i m pos e d, a nd tha tthe se nt ence i s s ub st ant i vel y unrea sonabl e. T he re cord ref l ec t s thatthe di stri ctcourt di d notpr oc e dur a l l ye rra nd tha t , i n l i ghtof the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t a nc e s , the s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . Se e U n ite d Sta tes v . Ca r ty , 520 F . 3d 984, 9 9 1 - 9 3 , 9 9 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) ; se e al so Mi qb el , 44 4 F . 3d at11 76 (s ent ence i m po se d u po n revocat i on of supervi se d rel ea se re vi ew ed for r ea sonabl enes s) . A FFI R M ED .
exhibit10-2.htm












CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 


THIS CONSULTING AGREEMENT made as of the 15th day of October, 2010.







BETWEEN:


NATURE’S CALL BRANDS, INC., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada


 


(the “Company”)


 


- and -


 


1367826 ONTARIO LIMITED, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario


 


(the “Consultant”)


 


- and -


 


ROBBIE MANIS


 


(the “Officer”)


 


WHEREAS the Company is desirous of engaging the Consultant and the Consultant is desirous of accepting such mandate, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged), the parties hereto agree as follows:







NOW THEREFORE








	
1.  

	
The Consultant will make available the services of the Officer who will act as the Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer as well as the sole director of the Company. In this capacity the Officer will fulfill all senior officer duties as required by the Company including sourcing and implementing new business opportunities, raising financing reasonably required from time to time by the Company, coordinating all required accounting, reporting and disclosure and fulfilling any other needed administrative functions.













	
2.  

	
In consideration of the provisions of the Consulting Services, the Company shall pay to the Consultant the sum of US$5,000 per month (the “Basic Monthly Fee”), on the 15th day of each calendar month for the duration of the Agreement, exclusive of any applicable sales tax.











  





  











  









	
3.  

	
This Consulting Agreement shall continue indefinitely unless terminated by either party with sixty (60) days advance written notice to the other party.













	
4.  

	
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Nevada, without reference to conflict of laws principles.







 



	
5.  

	
This Consulting Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which execution may be by facsimile, each of which shall be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written.







 



	  	  	
NATURE’S CALL BRANDS, INC.


	  	  	
By:

	
/s/ Robbie Manis


	  	  	  	
Robbie Manis, Chief Executive Officer












 



	  	  	
1367826 ONTARIO LIMITED


	  	  	
By:

	
/s/ Robbie Manis


	  	  	  	
Name:  Robbie Manis


A.S.O.












 



	
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED


in the presence of


/s/ Signed

	
)


)


)


)


)


)

	
 


 


/s/ Robbie Manis


	
Witness

	
Robbie Manis












 
















  





2
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**804 KA 13-01549**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DEONTE J. BRINSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), rendered January 3, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the first degree (two counts), criminal mischief in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, two counts of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [3], [4]) and two counts of robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [3], [4]) in connection with a home invasion robbery. Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record establishes that his waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, intelligent and voluntary ( see People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver encompasses his contention concerning the severity of the sentence ( see id. ).

Entered: July 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
From: alex < acabillo@hotmail.com >

Sent: Mon day, June 9, 2014 4:49 PM

To: TASreinterpretation

Subject: Proceed with TAS reinterpretation



### Fred Leutner, Please proceed with reinterpretation of TAS for tribes. Alex Cabillo
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 129 DB 2020 (No. 82 RST 2020)

:

KIMBERLY BANE HYNES : Attorney Registration No. 76479

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : ( Chester County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26 th day of October

, 2020 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated October 19

, 2020

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Kimberly Bane Hynes

, who has been on Inactive Status

, h as demonstrated that s he has

the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
J

- S42021

- 22

NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

- SEE SUPERIOR COURT O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Appellant

v.

JESSICA AMBER FROEHLICH :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 606 WDA 2022

Appeal from the Suppression Order Entered April 22, 2022 In the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County Criminal Division at No(s):

CP

- 25

- CR

- 0002135

- 2021

BEFORE: BOWES, J., OLSON, J., and COLINS, J. *

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY COLINS, J.: FILED: December 21, 2023

I feel compelled to write separately to distinguish that I am joining the

majority memorandum because I believe our Supreme Court’s decision in

Commonwe alth v. Hicks , 208 A.3d 916 (Pa. 2019), and this Court’s decision

in Commonwealth v. Malloy , 257 A.3d 142 (Pa. Super. 2021), compel the

result reached in this case

. At the same time, I note that the iss ue of police

officer safety that the dissent ing memorandum addresses at length makes me

question the internal logic of Malloy ’s holding that prevents officers from

conducting firearms authorization searches incidental to lawful traffic stops

when they are already in possession of the firearms in questio n. Without

Malloy , this Court could arguably distinguish Hicks in this case, but I disagree

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.J

- S42021

- 22

- 2

-

with the dissent that Malloy can be distinguished. For these reasons , I think

this case w ould warrant en banc review.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 183 (Monday, December 8, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1306]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      CONGRESSIONAL PROGRAM AHEAD

              Week of December 9 through December 13, 2008

                             Senate Chamber

  On Tuesday, at 12 noon, Senate will resume consideration of S. 3297, 
Advancing America's Priorities Act.
  During the balance of the week, Senate may consider any cleared 
legislative and executive business.

                           Senate Committees

        (Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated)
  Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: December 10, to hold 
hearings to examine investment in clean energy and natural resources 
projects and programs to create jobs and stimulate the economy, 9:30 
p.m., SD-366.
  Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions: December 10, 
to hold hearings to examine prevention and public health, 10 a.m., 
SD-192.
  Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs: December 
11, to hold hearings to examine a report from the Commission on the 
Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Proliferation, and 
Terrorism, 10 a.m., SH-216.
```
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4050 — Goldman Sachs/Cinven/Ahlsell)

(2005/C 307/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
Exhibit
32.3





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of National Property Analysts Master
Limited Partnership (“NPAMLP”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, David A. Simon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
EBL&S Property Management, Inc., Agent for NPAMLP and the equivalent of its
Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of NPAMLP.





National
      Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership(Registrant)Date:
                      May 12, 2010By:
                      EBL&S Property Management, Inc., Agent for
      NPAMLPBy:
                      /s/ David A. SimonName:
                      David
      A. SimonTitle:
                      Vice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; G08.                     

*Date:*                         March 13, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ali Sharma, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, NIH, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 500, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968,                         *ali.sharma@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 28, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-25385 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 3, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60850

Summary Calendar

 

ALLAUDDIN SULTAN FATTU

Petitioner

v.

ALBERTO R GONZALES, US ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A77 533 669

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Allauddin Sultan Fattu, a native and citizen of Pakistan,

petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) adopting and affirming, and dismissing Fattu’s

appeal of, the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his

application for withholding of removal, filed pursuant to 8

U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3). 

Because the BIA adopted the IJ’s decision, the IJ’s decision

is the final agency determination for judicial review. 
No. 04-60065

-2-

See Mikhael v. INS, 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). We will

uphold the finding that an alien is not eligible for withholding

of removal if that finding is supported by substantial evidence. 

See Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). The substantial

evidence standard requires that the IJ’s decision be based on the

record evidence and that the decision be substantially

reasonable. Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir.

1996). Under this standard, the IJ’s determination will be

affirmed unless the “evidence compels a contrary conclusion.” 

Id.

At his hearing before the IJ, Fattu asserted that several

years after he left Pakistan, political opponents of his father

threw stones at the family home and business several times,

forcing his parents to leave the country as well. The IJ

determined that these alleged actions were a “far cry” from

“persecution.” After reviewing the record and the briefs, we

conclude that the IJ’s decision is supported by substantial

evidence and that the record evidence does not compel a contrary

conclusion. See Carbajal-Gonzalez, 78 F.3d at 197. Fattu’s

allegations do not even rise to the level of other types of

mistreatment that we have held not to qualify as persecution. 

See, e.g., Abdel-Masieh v. INS, 73 F.3d 579, 584 (5th Cir. 1996);

Ozdemir v. INS, 46 F.3d 6, 7 (5th Cir. 1994). 

The petition for review is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions
Corp. (the Managing Owner), of Diversified Futures Trust I (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer     
|Kenneth A. Shewer         
|Co-Chief Executive Officer
|November 14, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of A.S.V., Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gary Lemke, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                         /s/ Gary Lemke
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Gary Lemke
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         November 9, 2004

                                       24