alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, William S. Urkiel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IKON Office Solutions, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IKON Office Solutions,
Inc;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such internal controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent financial quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: December 29, 2003



|/s/ WILLIAM S. URKIEL                            |  | 
|------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|William S. Urkiel                                |  | 
|Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,924,550
<SECURITIES>                                   50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,741,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    538,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,544,845
<PP&E>                                         491,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,533,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,768,684
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,043
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,596,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,533,115
<SALES>                                        3,923,446
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,923,446
<CGS>                                          957,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  957,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               905,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (59,638)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (523,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   44,971
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (568,863)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (568,863)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.06)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Diversified Futures Trust I for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                       
|------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ David K. Spohr                                                                                                                                                                    
|Name:  |  | David K. Spohr                                                                                                                                                                        
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer) Preferred Investment Solutions
Corp., Managing Owner of Diversified Futures Trust
I
|       | 
|Date:  |  | May 14, 2007
#### DEN ex dem. of ROBERT H. BURTON, *et. al. v.*JOHN CARRUTH.

The cutting grass in a meadow for seven years successively, stacking it on the land and fencing the stacks, will, with colour of title, bar the entry of one claiming adversely.

Ejectment tried before his Honour Judge Martin, at Lincoln, on the last Circuit. On the trial, it appeared that the land in dispute was patented in the year 1768 by Gillespie. Sloan conveyed the same land to Robert Wear, in the year 1798, and Wear to the lessors of the plaintiff, in the year 1826. To show that Gillespie, or his heirs, had lost their right of entry, and that the title to the land was completely vested in Wear, by the act of 1715, *(Rev. ch.*2,) the lessors of the plaintiff proved, that the grass of a meadow on the premises was mowed each successive year, for seven years, by Wear, or by persons authorised by him, and stacked on the ground, with a fence around the stacks. The question was, whether this was such a possession, as with his colourable title, gave Wear a good and valid title. The Judge instructed the jury that it was. *3A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

No counsel appeared for the defendant.

*Nash,*for the plaintiff.

Daniel, Judge,

after stating the case as above, proceeded : — We are of opinion that the instruction given by the Judge was correct. The seven years continued perception of the profits of the land, by Wear under his deed, by cutting the grass off the meadow, and stacking it on the land and fencing the stacks, was a possession under circumstances, sufficiently capable in their nature of notifying all persons, that he was upon the land claiming it as his own, *Den*v. *Mulford,*1 Hay. 320; *Grant*v. *Winborne,*2 Hay. 56. 76. The claim, or entry of Gillespie, or his heirs, or any person claiming under him, was, by the act of 1715, - *(Rev. ch.*2, sec. 4), perpetually barred ; and the title became perfect and complete in Wear, so as to enable him to convey to the lessors of the plaintiff.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
ACCEPTED

CV-15-00006-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

3/13/2015 2:28:41 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 03/13/2015 2:28:41 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Mark J. Thomas, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Abrams Industries, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to material affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        July 19, 2004 Date:/s/ Mark J. Thomas  Mark J. Thomas   Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 7, 2018

p0228 

# Order

Clerk March 7, 2018

156688

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 156688

COA: 331462

Oakland CC: 2015

- 255591

- FH

CHARLES WILLIAM WOOD,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT counsel for the defendant

to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 159 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10339-S10340]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED

       SA 5683. Mr. BINGAMAN (for Mr. Dorgan (for himself, Mr. 
     Bingaman, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Feingold, Mrs. Boxer, 
     Mr. Byrd, Mr. Sanders, and Mrs. Feinstein)) proposed an 
     amendment to the bill H.R. 7081, to approve the United 
     States-India Agreement for Cooperation on Peaceful Uses of 
     Nuclear Energy, and for other purposes.
       SA 5684. Mr. DODD (for Mr. Pryor) proposed an amendment to 
     the bill S. 602, to develop the next generation of parental 
     control technology.
       SA 5685. Mr. DODD proposed an amendment to the bill H.R. 
     1424, of 1974, section 2705 of the Public Health Service Act, 
     section 9812 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 
     equity in the provision of mental health and substance-
     related disorder benefits under group health plans, to 
     prohibit discrimination on the basis of genetic information 
     with respect to health insurance and employment, and for 
     other purposes.
       SA 5686. Mr. DODD proposed an amendment to the bill H.R. 
     1424, supra.
       SA 5687. Mr. SANDERS proposed an amendment to amendment SA 
     5685 proposed by Mr. Dodd to the bill H.R. 1424, supra.
       SA 5688. Mr. DURBIN proposed an amendment to the bill S. 
     1703, to prevent and reduce trafficking in persons.
       SA 5689. Mr. DURBIN (for Ms. Collins) proposed an amendment 
     to the bill S. 3013, to provide for retirement equity for 
     Federal employees in nonforeign areas outside the 48 
     contiguous States and the District of Columbia, and for other 
     purposes.
       SA 5690. Mr. DURBIN (for Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mrs. 
     Feinstein)) proposed an amendment to the bill S. 3073, to 
     amend the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act 
     to improve procedures for the collection and delivery of 
     absentee ballots of absent overseas uniformed services 
     voters, and for other purposes.
       SA 5691. Ms. CANTWELL submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 1424, of 1974, section 2705 
     of the Public Health Service Act, section 9812 of the 
     Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require equity in the 
     provision of mental health and substance-related disorder 
     benefits under group health plans, to prohibit discrimination 
     on the basis of genetic information with

[[Page S10340]]

     respect to health insurance and employment, and for other 
     purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23(C)

                                     CONSENT

We hereby consent to the reference to our firm name and our review of the
estimates of proved reserves of natural gas, oil and natural gas liquids that
Energen Corporation attributed to its net interests in oil and gas properties
located in the U.S. as of December 31, 2003, which appears in this Form 10-K. In
addition, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-00395, File No. 333-43245 and
File No. 333-86056) and Forms S-8 (File No. 33-27869, File No. 33-46641, File
No. 33-48504, File No. 33-48505, File No. 33-26111, File No. 33-45107 and File
No. 333-84170) of Energen Corporation to the reference to our firm name and our
review of the estimates of proved reserves of natural gas, oil and natural gas
liquids that Energen Corporation attributed to its net interests in oil and gas
properties located in the U.S. as of December 31, 2003, which appears in this
Form 10-K.


Miller and Lents, Ltd.
Birmingham, Alabama
March 12, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request To Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 499 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-116, K2025-114.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25252 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerDecember 14, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 I, Jeffrey R. Mistarz, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Electric City Corp.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuers internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the small business issuers most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting. Date: March 29, 2004 /s/ Jeffrey R. Mistarz