# RULES AND REGULATIONS

**Title 25—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION** 

**ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD [ 25 PA. CODE CH. 129 ]** **Large Appliance and Metal Furniture Surface Coat**

**ing Processes**

The Environmental Quality Board (Board) amends Chapter 129 (relating to standards for sources) to read as set forth in Annex A.

The final-form rulemaking amends Chapter 129 to limit emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the use and application of coatings and cleaning materials inlarge appliance and metal furniture surface coating processes. The final-form rulemaking adds § 129.52a (relating to control of VOC emissions from large appliance and metal furniture surface coating processes) and amends §§ 129.51 and 129.52 (relating to general; and surface coating processes).

This order was adopted by the Board at its meeting on June 15, 2010.

A. Effective Date

This final-form rulemaking will be effective upon finalform publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin

. B. Contact Persons

For further information, contact Arleen J. Shulman, Chief, Division of Air Resource Management, P. O. Box 8468, Rachel Carson State Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8468, (717) 772-3436; or Kristen Campfield Furlan, Assistant Counsel, Bureau of Regulatory Counsel, P. O. Box 8464, Rachel Carson State Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8464, (717) 787-7060. Persons with a disability may use the Pennsylvania AT&T Relay Service by calling (800) 654-5984 (TDD users) or (800) 654-5988 (voice users). This final-form rulemaking is available electronically through the Department of Environmental Protection’s (Department) web site atwww.depweb.state.pa.us (DEP Keyword: Public Participation).

C. Statutory Authority

This final-form rulemaking is authorized under section 5 of the Air Pollution Control Act (APCA) (35 P. S. § 4005), which in subsection (a)(1) grants the Board theauthority to adopt rules and regulations for the prevention, control, reduction and abatement of air pollution in this Commonwealth and in subsection (a)(8) grants theBoard the authority to adopt rules and regulations designed to implement the Clean Air Act (CAA) (42 U.S.C.A. §§ 7401—7671q).

D. Background and Purpose

The purpose of this final-form rulemaking is to reduce VOC emissions from large appliance and metal furniture surface coating operations. VOCs are a precursor forozone formation. Ground-level ozone is not emitted directly by surface coatings to the atmosphere, but is formed by a photochemical reaction between VOCs and nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the presence of sunlight. The final-form rulemaking adopts the emission limits and other requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2007 Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for large appliance coatings and metal furniture coatings to meet Federal CAA requirements.

The EPA is responsible for establishing National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six criteria pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment: ozone; particulate matter; NOx; carbon monoxide; sulfur dioxide; and lead. The CAA established two types of NAAQS: primary standards, limits set to protect public health; and secondary standards, limits set to protect public welfare, including protection against visibility impairment and from damage to animals, crops, vegetation and buildings. The EPA established primary and secondary ozone NAAQS to protect public health and welfare.

When ground-level ozone is present in concentrations in excess of the Federal health-based 8-hour NAAQS for ozone, public health and welfare are adversely affected.Ozone exposure correlates to increased respiratory disease and higher mortality rates. Ozone can inflame and damage the lining of the lungs. Within a few days, the damaged cells are shed and replaced. Over a long time period, lung tissue may become permanently scarred, resulting in permanent loss of lung function and a lower quality of life. When ambient ozone levels are high, more people with asthma have attacks that require a doctor’s attention or use of medication. Ozone also makes people more sensitive to allergens including pet dander, pollen and dust mites, which can trigger asthma attacks.

The EPA concluded that there is an association between high levels of ambient ozone and increased hospital admissions for respiratory ailments including asthma. While children, the elderly and those with respiratory problems are most at risk, even healthy individuals may experience increased respiratory ailments and other symptoms when they are exposed to high levels of ambient ozone while engaged in activities that involve physical exertion. High levels of ozone also affect animals in ways similar to humans.

In addition to causing adverse human and animal health effects, the EPA concluded that ozone affectsvegetation and ecosystems, leading to reductions in agricultural crop and commercial forest yields by destroying chlorophyll; reduced growth and survivability of tree seedlings; and increased plant susceptibility to disease, pests and other environmental stresses, including harsh weather. In long-lived species, these effects may become evident only after several years or even decades and have the potential for long-term adverse impacts on forest ecosystems. Ozone damage to the foliage of trees andother plants can decrease the aesthetic value of ornamental species used in residential landscaping, as well as the natural beauty of parks and recreation areas. Throughdeposition, ground-level ozone also contributes to pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. The economic value of some welfare losses due to ozone can be calculated, such as crop yield loss from both reduced seed production andvisible injury to some leaf crops, including lettuce, spinach and tobacco, as well as visible injury to ornamental plants, including grass, flowers and shrubs. Other types of welfare loss may not be quantifiable, such as the reduced aesthetic value of trees growing in heavily visited parks. 

### 5132

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 40, NO. 37, SEPTEMBER 11, 2010**High levels of ground-level ozone can also cause damage to buildings and synthetic fibers, including nylon, and reduced visibility on roadways and in natural areas. The implementation of additional measures to address ozoneair quality nonattainment in this Commonwealth is necessary to protect the public health and welfare, animal and plant health and welfare and the environment.

In 1997, the EPA established primary and secondary ozone standards at a level of 0.08 parts per million (ppm) averaged over 8 hours. See 62 FR 38855 (July 18, 1997).In 2004, the EPA designated 37 counties in this Commonwealth as 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 69 FR 23858, 23931 (April 30, 2004). This Commonwealth is meeting the 1997 standard in all areas except the five-county Philadelphia area. The areas in which the 1997 standard has been attained arerequired to have permanent and enforceable control measures to ensure violations do not occur for the next decade.

Furthermore, in March 2008, the EPA lowered the primary and secondary standards to 0.075 ppm averaged over 8 hours to provide even greater protection for children, other at-risk populations and the environment against the array of ozone-induced adverse health and welfare effects. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). The EPA is reconsidering the March 2008 ozone NAAQS and proposed at 75 FR 2938 (January 19, 2010) to set a more protective 8-hour ozone primary standard between 0.060and 0.070 ppm to provide increased protection for children and other at-risk groups. The EPA also proposedthat the secondary ozone standard, which was set identically to the revised primary standard in the 2008 final rule, should instead be a new cumulative, seasonal standard. See 75 FR 2938. This seasonal standard isdesigned to protect plants and trees from damage occurring from repeated ozone exposure, which can reduce tree growth, damage leaves and increase susceptibility to disease. The final revised ozone NAAQS are expected in October 2010.

There are no Federal statutory or regulatory limits for VOC emissions from large appliance and metal furniture surface coating operations. State regulations to control VOC emissions from large appliance and metal furniture surface coating operations are required under Federal law, however, and will be reviewed by the EPA forwhether they meet the reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements of the CAA and its implementing regulations. See 72 FR 57215, 57218 (October 9, 2007).

Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA (42 U.S.C.A. § 7502(c)(1)) provides that State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for nonattainment areas must include reasonably availablecontrol measures, including RACT, for sources of emissions. Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA (42 U.S.C.A.§ 7511a(b)(2)) provides that for moderate ozone nonattainment areas, states shall revise their SIPs to include RACT for sources of VOC emissions covered by a CTG document issued by the EPA prior to the area’s date of attainment. More importantly, section 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA (42 U.S.C.A. § 7511a(b)(1)(B)) requires that states inthe Ozone Transport Region (OTR), including the Commonwealth, submit a SIP revision requiring implementation of RACT for sources of VOC emissions in the state covered by a specific CTG.

Section 183(e) of the CAA (42 U.S.C.A. § 7511b(e)) directs the EPA to list for regulation those categories of products that account for at least 80% of the VOC emissions from consumer and commercial products in ozone nonattainment areas. Section 183(e)(3)(C) of the CAA further provides that the EPA may issue a CTG in place of a National regulation for a product categorywhen the EPA determines that the CTG will be ‘‘substantially as effective as regulations’’ in reducing emissions of VOC in ozone nonattainment areas.

In 1995, the EPA listed large appliance coatings and metal furniture coatings on its § 183(e) list and in 2007 issued CTGs for these two product categories. See 60 FR 15264 (March 23, 1995) and 72 FR 57215. In the 2007 notice, the EPA determined that the CTGs would besubstantially as effective as National regulations in reducing VOC emissions from these product categories in ozone nonattainment areas. See 72 FR 57215, 57220.

The CTG provides states with the EPA’s recommendation of what constitutes RACT for the covered category. States can use the recommendations provided in the CTG to inform their own determination as to what constitutes RACT for VOC emissions from the covered category. State air pollution control agencies are free to implement other technically sound approaches that are consistent with theCAA requirements and the EPA’s implementing regulations or guidelines.

The Department reviewed the recommendations included in the 2007 CTGs for large appliance and metal furniture coatings for their applicability to the ozone reduction measures necessary for this Commonwealth. The Department determined that the measures provided in the CTGs for large appliance and metal furniturecoatings are appropriate to be implemented in this Commonwealth as RACT for this category.

This final-form rulemaking will assist in reducing VOC emissions locally as well as reducing the transport of VOC emissions and ground-level ozone to downwind states. Adoption of VOC emission requirements for large appliance and metal furniture surface coating operations is part of the Commonwealth’s strategy, in concert with other OTR jurisdictions, to further reduce transport of VOC ozone precursors and ground-level ozone throughout the OTR to attain and maintain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The final-form rulemaking is required under the CAA and is reasonably necessary to attain and maintain the health-based 8-hour ozone NAAQS and to satisfy related CAA requirements in this Commonwealth. This final-form rulemaking will be submitted to the EPA as a revision to the SIP.

The final-form rulemaking was discussed with the Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee (AQTAC) on April 29, 2010. The AQTAC voted 13-0-1 to concur with the Department’s recommendation to present the final-form amendments to the Board for approval for publication as a final-form rulemaking. The Department also consulted with the Small Business Compliance Advisory Committee (SBCAC) on April 28, 2010, and the Citizens Advisory Council (CAC) on May 6, 2010. The SBCAC and CAC did not have concerns.

E. Summary of Regulatory Requirements and Changes to

the Proposed Rulemaking

The final-form rulemaking amends § 129.51(a) to extend its coverage to large appliance and metal furnituresurface coating processes covered by this final-form rulemaking. Section 129.51(a) provides an alternative methodfor owners and operators of facilities to achieve compliance with air emission limits. 

### RULES AND REGULATIONS 5133

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 40, NO. 37, SEPTEMBER 11, 2010**The final-form rulemaking amends § 129.52 by adding subsection (i). Section 129.52 specifies requirements and emission limits for various surface coating processes. The amendment in this final-form rulemaking clarifies in subsection (i) that the requirements and limits already specified in § 129.52 for metal furniture coatings andlarge appliance coatings are superseded by the requirements and limits that will be adopted in this final-form rulemaking.

One emission limit is expressed in § 129.52 for large appliance coatings and one emission limit is expressed for metal furniture coatings, whereas in the CTGs separate emission limits are expressed for eight different coating types within each of these two categories. Several of the limits in the CTGs are more stringent and several are less stringent than the existing limits expressed in § 129.52. As is explained in the following discussion regarding § 129.52a, Tables I and II (relating to emission limits of VOCs for large appliance surface coatings; and emission limits of VOCs for metal furniture surface coatings), the more stringent limits are retained in this final-form rulemaking.

The final-form rulemaking adds § 129.52a to regulate VOC emissions from large appliance and metal furniture surface coating processes. The applicability of this new section is described in subsection (a), which establishes that § 129.52a applies to the owner and operator of a large appliance or metal furniture surface coating process if the total actual VOC emissions from large appliance ormetal furniture surface coating operations, including related cleaning activities, at the facility are equal to or greater than 15 pounds (6.8 kilograms) per day or 2.7 tons (2,455 kilograms) per 12-month rolling period before consideration of controls. The emission limits and other requirements of this section supersede the emission limitsand other requirements of § 129.52. Basing the applicability on a 12-month rolling period is generally considered to be more stringent than basing it on a calendar year, as in § 129.52, but is consistent with the CTGs.

Final-form subsection (b) explains that § 129.52a supersedes the requirements of a RACT permit for VOC emissions from a large appliance or metal furniture surface coating operation already issued to the owner or operator of a source subject to § 129.52a, except to theextent the RACT permit contains more stringent requirements.

Final-form subsection (c) establishes VOC emission limits. Beginning January 1, 2011, a person may not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOCs from a large appliance or metal furniture surface coating process, unless: the VOC content of each as applied coating is equal to or less than the limit specified in one of the two tables in § 129.52a; or the overall weight of VOCs emitted to the atmosphere is reduced through the use of vapor recovery, incineration or another method that is acceptable under § 129.51(a). The second option also addresses the overall efficiency of a control system.

Final-form subsection (d) identifies daily records that shall be kept to demonstrate compliance with § 129.52a, including records of parameters and VOC content of each coating, thinner, component and cleaning solvent, as supplied, and the VOC content of each as applied coating or cleaning solvent. Final-form subsection (e) contains a change to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements proposed in § 129.52a(e). The proposed rulemaking required thatrecords be maintained for 2 years. The final-form provision requires that records be maintained for 2 years unless a longer period is required under § 127.511(b)(2) (relating to monitoring and related recordkeeping and reporting requirements). Additionally, § 129.52a(e) has been amended to clarify that records shall be submitted to the Department upon receipt of a written request.

Under final-form subsection (f), an owner or operatorsubject to § 129.52a may not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOCs from the application of large appliance or metal furniture surfacecoatings, unless the coatings are applied using electrostatic coating, roller coating, flow coating, dip coating (including electrodeposition), high volume-low pressure spray or brush coating. An owner or operator may useanother coating application method if a request is submitted in writing to the Department that demonstrates that the method is capable of achieving a transfer efficiency equivalent to or better than that achieved by the other methods in subsection (f) and is approved in writing by the Department prior to use.

Final-form subsection (g) exempts stencil coatings,safety-indicating coatings, solid-film lubricants, electricinsulating coatings, thermal-conducting coatings, touch-up and repair coatings and coating applications using hand-held aerosol cans from the VOC coating content limits in § 129.52a, Tables I and II. Subsection(g) also exempts a coating used exclusively for determining product quality and commercial acceptance and other small quantity coatings if the quantity of coating used does not exceed 50 gallons per year for a single coating and a total of 200 gallons per year for all coatings combined for the facility and if the owner or operator of the facility requests, in writing, and the Department approves, in writing, the exemption prior to use of the coating.

Final-form subsection (h) establishes work practices that an owner or operator of a large appliance or metal furniture surface coating process subject to § 129.52a shall comply with for coating-related activities.

Final-form subsection (i) establishes work practices that an owner or operator of a large appliance or metal furniture surface coating process subject to § 129.52a shall comply with for cleaning materials.

Final-form Table I establishes emission limits for VOCsfor eight types of large appliance surface coatings, expressed in weight of VOC per volume of coating solids (kilograms per liter (kg/l) or pounds per gallon (lb/gal)), as applied. Limits are prescribed for coatings that are baked and coatings that are air dried. The emission limits for the following coating types are taken from the large appliance coatings CTG: Baked (kg/l and lb/gal)—‘‘General, One Component’’ and ‘‘General, MultiComponent’’; Air Dried (kg/l)—‘‘General, One Component’’;and Air Dried (lb/gal)—‘‘General, One Component,’’ ‘‘General, Multi-Component’’ and ‘‘Extreme High Gloss.’’ Theemission limits for Air Dried (kg/l)—‘‘General, MultiComponent’’ and ‘‘Extreme High Gloss’’ are taken from both the CTG and the emission limit for large appliance coatings in § 129.52, as they are the same in both places. The remaining emission limits are taken from § 129.52 because the limit in § 129.52 is more stringent than the recommended limits in the CTG. Whenever the limit in § 129.52 is the same as or more stringent than the recommended limit in the CTG, the limit in § 129.52 is 

### 5134 RULES AND REGULATIONS

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 40, NO. 37, SEPTEMBER 11, 2010**retained due to the CAA prohibition against backsliding from existing emission control requirements.

Final-form Table II establishes emission limits for VOCs for eight types of metal furniture surface coatings, expressed in weight of VOC per volume of coating solids (kg/l or lb/gal), as applied. Limits are prescribed for coatings that are baked and coatings that are air dried. The emission limits from the following coating types are taken from the metal furniture CTG: Baked (kg/l andlb/gal)—‘‘General, One Component’’ and ‘‘General, MultiComponent’’; and Air Dried (kg/l and lb/gal)—‘‘General,One Component,’’ ‘‘General, Multi-Component’’ and ‘‘Extreme High Gloss.’’ The emission limits for Baked (kg/l)— ‘‘Extreme High Gloss,’’ ‘‘Extreme Performance,’’ ‘‘Heat Resistant’’ and ‘‘Solar Absorbent’’ are taken from both the CTG and the emission limit for metal furniture coatings in § 129.52, as they are the same in both places. Theremaining emission limits are taken from § 129.52 because the limit in § 129.52 is more stringent than the recommended limits in the CTG. Whenever the limit in § 129.52 is the same as or more stringent than the recommended limit in the CTG, the limit in § 129.52 is retained due to the CAA prohibition against backsliding from existing emission control requirements.

The tables in the final-form rulemaking include several amendments to emission limits made for the purpose of providing consistency in the number of significant digits. Specifically, the emission limit of 3.3 lb/gal in the ‘‘Baked’’ columns for ‘‘General, One Component’’ and ‘‘General, Multi-Component,’’ and in the ‘‘Air Dried’’ columns for ‘‘General, One Component’’ coatings has been revised to 3.34 lb/gal. The proposed emission limit of 4.5 lb/gal in the ‘‘Air Dried’’ columns for ‘‘General, Multi-Component’’ and ‘‘Extreme High Gloss’’ coatings has been revised at final to 4.62 lb/gal. The 4.62 lb/gal emission limit is being used to provide consistency with the limit in § 129.52 in addition to providing for consistency in the number of significant digits. Despite the fact that 4.62 is a higher emission limit than the limit of 4.5 recommended in the CTGs, the emission reduction that will be achieved is equivalent. The difference between these two numbers is due to different but equally acceptable methodologies being used for rounding during the conversion from metric units to English units. The reductions achieved with the emission limit of 4.62 lb/gal for the ‘‘General, Multi-Component’’ and ‘‘Extreme High Gloss’’ coatings are equivalent to those that would be achieved by using the number recommended in the CTGs.

F. Comments and Responses

The Board approved publication of the proposed rulemaking at its meeting on November 17, 2009. The proposed rulemaking was published at 40 Pa.B. 420 (January 16, 2010) with a 66-day public comment period. Three public hearings were held on February 16, 17 and 18, 2010, in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg and Norristown, PA, respectively. The public comment period closed on March 22, 2010.

No public comments were received by the Board.
The Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC) commented that proposed § 129.52a(d), which required the owners and operators of the regulated surface coating processes to maintain certain records, is unclear. IRRC requested that the Board clarify the format in which these records must be maintained. The Board respectfully disagrees that subsection (d) was unclear. Requiring regulated facilities to maintain records is astandard requirement in many Board-approved regulations, including § 129.52(g), for instance. Neither the Department nor the regulated sources have had difficulty understanding or complying with this requirement.

IRRC commented that proposed § 129.52a(e), which required that records required under § 129.52a(d) be submitted to the Department ‘‘upon request,’’ is unclear as to whether this request will be made orally or in writing. The Board agrees and revised the final-form rulemaking to specify that the records shall be submitted to the Department upon receipt of a written request.

G. Benefits, Costs and Compliance Benefits

Implementation of the final-form rulemaking will benefit the health and welfare of the approximately 12 million residents and the animals, crops, vegetation andnatural areas of this Commonwealth by reducing emissions of VOCs, which are precursors to ground-level ozoneair pollution. Although the final-form rulemaking is designed primarily to address ozone air quality, the reformulation or substitution of coating products to meet the VOC content limits applicable to users may also result in reduction of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions, which are also a serious health threat.

The final-form rulemaking provides as one compliance option that coatings used on or applied to large applianceor metal furniture products manufactured in this Commonwealth meet specified limits for VOC content, usually through substitution of low VOC-content solvents or water for the high VOC-content solvents. The reduced levels of high VOC-content solvents will also benefitwater quality through reduced loading on water treatment plants and in reduced quantities of high VOCcontent solvents leaching into the ground. Owners and operators of affected large appliance and metal furniture coating process facilities may also reduce VOC emissions through the use of add-on controls, or a combination of complying coatings and add-on controls.

In this Commonwealth, approximately 4 large appliance surface coating operations combine to emit an estimated total of 18.2 tons of VOCs per year and about 16 metal furniture surface coating operations combine to emit an estimated total of 50.33 tons of VOCs per year.

The EPA estimates that implementation of the recommended control options for large appliance coatings processes will result in approximately a 30% reduction in VOC emissions. The maximum anticipated additional annual VOC reductions from the large appliance surface coating facilities as a result of this final-form rulemaking is approximately 5.5 tons (18.2 tons × 30%).

The EPA estimates that implementation of the recommended control options for metal furniture coatings processes will result in approximately a 35% reduction in VOC emissions. The maximum anticipated additional annual VOC reductions from the metal furniture surface coating facilities as a result of this final-form rulemaking is approximately 17.6 tons (50.33 tons × 35%). Compliance Costs

The costs of complying with the final-form rulemaking include the cost of using alternative product formulations, such as low-VOC or water-based coatings, and the cost of using add-on controls. The facility owner or operator will be given the flexibility to choose controls. Based on information provided by the EPA in the large appliance coating CTG, the cost effectiveness of reducing VOC emissions from large appliance surface coating operations is estimated to be $500 per ton of VOC reduced. This 

### RULES AND REGULATIONS 5135

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 40, NO. 37, SEPTEMBER 11, 2010**estimate is based on the use of low VOC-content coatings for control. The estimated annual costs for the owners or operators of the affected large appliance surface coating facilities in this Commonwealth, combined, is $2,750 (5.5 tons VOC reduced × $500 per ton reduced).

Similarly, based on information provided by the EPA in the metal furniture coating CTG, the cost effectiveness of reducing VOC emissions from metal furniture surface coating operations is estimated to be $200 per ton of VOC reduced. This estimate is based on the use of low VOC-content coatings for control. The estimated annual costs for the owners or operators of the affected metalfurniture coating facilities in this Commonwealth, combined, is $3,520 (17.6 tons VOC reduced × $200 per ton reduced).

The potential total annual costs to the regulated industry of $2,750 for large appliance surface coating operations and $3,520 for metal furniture surface coating operations are negligible compared to the improved health and environmental benefits that will be gained from this final-form rulemaking.

The implementation of the work practice requirements for cleaning materials is expected to result in a net cost savings. The recommended work practices should reduce the amount of cleaning materials used by reducing the amount of cleaning materials lost to evaporation, spillage and waste.

Compliance Assistance Plan

The Department plans to educate and assist the public and regulated community in understanding the revised requirements and how to comply with them. This will beaccomplished through the Department’s ongoing compliance assistance program.

Paperwork Requirements

The owners and operators of affected large appliance ormetal furniture surface coating operations shall be required to keep daily operational records of information for coatings and cleaning solvents sufficient to demonstrate compliance, including identification of materials, VOCcontent and volumes used. The records must be maintained for 2 years and submitted to the Department upon request. Persons claiming the small quantity exemption or use of exempt coating shall be required to keep records demonstrating the validity of the exemption. Persons seeking to comply through the use of add-on controlsshall be required to meet the applicable reporting requirements specified in Chapter 139 (relating to sampling and testing).

H. Pollution Prevention

The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C.A.§§ 13101—13109) established a National policy that promotes pollution prevention as the preferred means forachieving state environmental protection goals. The Department encourages pollution prevention, which is the reduction or elimination of pollution at its source, through the substitution of environmentally friendly materials, more efficient use of raw materials and the incorporationof energy efficiency strategies. Pollution prevention practices can provide greater environmental protection with greater efficiency because they can result in significant cost savings to facilities that permanently achieve or move beyond compliance. This final-form rulemaking incorporates the following pollution prevention incentives. The final-form rulemaking assures that the citizens and the environment of this Commonwealth will experience the benefits of reduced emissions of VOCs and HAPs fromlarge appliance and metal furniture surface coating processes. Although the final-form rulemaking is designed primarily to address ozone air quality, the reformulation or substitution of coating products to meet the VOC content limits applicable to users may also result in reduction of HAP emissions, which are also a serious health threat. The final-form rulemaking provides as one compliance option that coatings used on or applied to large appliance or metal furniture products manufactured in this Commonwealth meet specified limits for VOC content, usually through substitution of low VOC-content solvents or water for the high VOC-content solvents. The reduced levels of high VOC-content solvents will also benefit water quality through reduced loading on watertreatment plants and in reduced quantities of high VOCcontent solvents leaching into the ground. Owners and operators of affected large appliance and metal furniture surface coating process facilities may also reduce VOCemissions through the use of add-on controls or a combination of complying coatings and add-on controls.

I. Sunset Review

This final-form rulemaking will be reviewed in accordance with the sunset review schedule published by theDepartment to determine whether the regulations effectively fulfill the goals for which they were intended.
J. Regulatory Review

Under section 5(a) of the Regulatory Review Act (71 P. S. § 745.5(a)), on January 5, 2010, the Department submitted a copy of the notice of proposed rulemaking, published at 40 Pa.B. 420, to IRRC and to the House and Senate Environmental Resources and Energy Committees (Committees) for review and comment.

Under section 5(c) of the Regulatory Review Act, IRRC and the Committees were provided with copies of the comments received during the public comment period, as well as other documents when requested. In preparingthe final-form rulemaking, the Department has considered all comments from IRRC, the Committees and the public.

Under section 5.1(j.2) of the Regulatory Review Act (71 P. S. § 745.5a(j.2)), on August 4, 2010, the final-form rulemaking was deemed approved by the Committees. Under section 5.1(e) of the Regulatory Review Act, IRRC met on August 6, 2010, and approved the final-form rulemaking.
K. Findings

The Board finds that: (1) Public notice of proposed rulemaking was given under sections 201 and 202 of the act of July 31, 1968 (P. L. 769, No. 240) (45 P. S. §§ 1201 and 1202) and regulations promulgated thereunder, 1 Pa. Code §§ 7.1 and 7.2.

(2) At least a 60-day public comment period was provided as required by law and all comments were considered.

(3) These final-form regulations do not enlarge the purpose of the proposed rulemaking published at 40 Pa.B. 420.

(4) These regulations are necessary and appropriate for administration and enforcement of the authorizing acts identified in Section C of this preamble.

(5) These regulations are necessary to attain and maintain the ozone NAAQS and to satisfy related CAA requirements. 

### 5136 RULES AND REGULATIONS

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 40, NO. 37, SEPTEMBER 11, 2010**L. Order The Board, acting under the authorizing statutes, orders that:

(a) The regulations of the Department, 25 Pa. Code Chapter 129, are amended by amending §§ 129.51 and 129.52 and adding § 129.52a to read as set forth in Annex A, with ellipses referring to the existing text of the regulations.

(b) The Chairperson of the Board shall submit this order and Annex A to the Office of General Counsel and the Office of Attorney General for review and approval as to legality and form as required by law.

(c) The Chairperson of the Board shall submit this order and Annex A to IRRC and the Committees as required by the Regulatory Review Act.

(d) The Chairperson of the Board shall certify this order and Annex A and deposit them with the Legislative Reference Bureau, as required by law.

(e) This final-form rulemaking will be submitted to the EPA as an amendment to the Pennsylvania SIP.

(f) This order shall take effect immediately upon publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin

. JOHN HANGER, Chairperson
(Editor’s Note : For the text of the order of the Independent Regulatory Review Commission relating to this document, see 40 Pa.B. 4814 (August 21, 2010).)

Fiscal Note: Fiscal Note 7-449 remains valid for the final adoption of the subject regulations.

Annex A

TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Subpart C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES

ARTICLE III. AIR RESOURCES

CHAPTER 129. STANDARDS FOR SOURCES

SOURCES OF VOCs
§ 129.51. General.

(a) Equivalency. Compliance with §§ 129.52, 129.52a,and 129.54—129.73 may be achieved by alternative methods if the following exist:

(1) The alternative method is approved by the Department in an applicable plan approval or operating permit, or both.

(2) The resulting emissions are equal to or less thanthe emissions that would have been discharged by complying with the applicable emission limitation.

(3) Compliance by a method other than the use of a low VOC coating or ink which meets the applicable emission limitation in §§ 129.52, 129.52a, 129.67 and 129.73 shall be determined on the basis of equal volumes of solids.

(4) Capture efficiency testing and emissions testing are conducted in accordance with methods approved by the EPA.

(5) Adequate records are maintained to ensure enforceability.

(6) The alternative compliance method is incorporatedinto a plan approval or operating permit, or both, reviewed by the EPA, including the use of an air cleaning device to comply with § 129.52, § 129.52a, § 129.67, § 129.68(b)(2) and (c)(2) or § 129.73.

(b) New source performance standards. Sources covered by new source performance standards which are more stringent than those contained in this chapter shall comply with those standards in lieu of the standards found in this chapter.

(c) Demonstration of compliance. Test methods and procedures used to monitor compliance with the emissionrequirements of this section are those specified in Chapter 139 (relating to sampling and testing).

(d) Records. The owner or operator of a facility or source subject to the VOC emission limitations and control requirements in this chapter shall keep records to demonstrate compliance with the applicable limitation or control requirement.

(1) The records must provide sufficient data and calculations to clearly demonstrate that the emission limitations or control requirements are met. Data or information required to determine compliance with an applicable limitation shall be recorded and maintained in a timeframe consistent with the averaging period of the standard.

(2) The records shall be retained at least 2 years and shall be made available to the Department on request.

(3) An owner or operator claiming that a facility or source is exempt from the VOC control provisions of this chapter shall maintain records that clearly demonstrate to the Department that the facility or source is notsubject to the VOC emission limitations or control requirements.
§ 129.52. Surface coating processes.

*****
(i) Beginning January 1, 2011, the requirements and limits for metal furniture coatings and large appliancecoatings in this section are superseded by the requirements and limits in § 129.52a (relating to control of VOCemissions from large appliance and metal furniture surface coating processes).

*****
§ 129.52a. Control of VOC emissions from large appliance and metal furniture surface coating processes. (a) Applicability. This section applies as follows:
(1) This section applies to the owner and operator of a large appliance or metal furniture surface coating process if the total actual VOC emissions from all large appliance or metal furniture surface coating operations, including related cleaning activities, at the facility are equal to or greater than 15 pounds (6.8 kilograms) per day or 2.7 tons (2,455 kilograms) per 12-month rolling period, before consideration of controls.

(2) The emission limits and other requirements of thissection supersede the emission limits and other requirements of § 129.52 (relating to surface coating processes) for large appliance and metal furniture surface coating

processes.

(b) Existing RACT permit. The requirements of this section supersede the requirements of a RACT permit issued to the owner or operator of a source subject to subsection (a)(1) prior to January 1, 2011, under §§ 129.91—129.95 (relating to stationary sources of NOx and VOCs) to control, reduce or minimize VOCs from a 

### RULES AND REGULATIONS 5137

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 40, NO. 37, SEPTEMBER 11, 2010**large appliance or metal furniture surface coating operation, except to the extent the RACT permit contains more stringent requirements.

(c) Emission limits. Beginning January 1, 2011, a person subject to this section may not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOCs from alarge appliance or metal furniture surface coating process, unless one of the following limitations is met:

(1) The VOC content of each as applied coating is equal to or less than the limit specified in Table I or Table II (relating to emission limits of VOCs for large appliance surface coatings; and emission limits of VOCs for metal furniture surface coatings).

(i) The VOC content of the as applied coating, expressed in units of weight of VOC per volume of coating solids, shall be calculated as follows:
VOC = (W

o )(D

c )/V

n Where: VOC = VOC content in lb VOC/gal of coating solids

W

o = Weight percent of VOC (W

v -W

w -W

ex )

W

v = Weight percent of total volatiles (100%-weight percent solids)

W

w = Weight percent of water

W

ex = Weight percent of exempt solvent(s)

D

c = Density of coating, lb/gal, at 25° C

V

n = Volume percent of solids of the as applied coating

(ii) The VOC content of a dip coating, expressed in units of weight of VOC per volume of coating solids, shall be calculated on a 30-day rolling average basis using the following equation:

SUM i (W oi × D ci × Q i ) + SUM J (W oJ × D dJ × Q J ) VOC A = SUM i (Vni × Q i )

Where:

VOC A = VOC content in lb VOC/gal of coating solids for a dip coating, calculated on a 30-day rolling average basis

Woi = Percent VOC by weight of each as supplied coating (i) added to the dip coating process, expressed as a decimal fraction (that is 55% = 0.55)

D ci = Density of each as supplied coating (i) added to the dip coating process, in pounds per gallon
Q i = Quantity of each as supplied coating (i) added to the dip coating process, in gallons

Vni = Percent solids by volume of each as supplied coating (i) added to the dip coating process, expressed as a decimal fraction

W oJ = Percent VOC by weight of each thinner (J) added to the dip coating process, expressed as a decimal fraction

D dJ = Density of each thinner (J) added to the dip coating process, in pounds per gallon
Q J = Quantity of each thinner (J) added to the dip coating process, in gallons

(iii) Sampling and testing shall be done in accordancewith the procedures and test methods specified in Chapter 139 (relating to sampling and testing).

(2) The overall weight of VOCs emitted to the atmosphere is reduced through the use of vapor recovery or incineration or another method that is acceptable under § 129.51(a) (relating to general). The overall efficiency of a control system, as determined by the test methods and procedures specified in Chapter 139, may be no less than 90% or may be no less than the equivalent efficiency as calculated by the following equation, whichever is less stringent:

O = (1

E/V) × 100

Where:
V = The VOC content of the as applied coating, in lb VOC/gal of coating solids.
E = The Table I or Table II limit in lb VOC /gal of coating solids.
O = The overall required control efficiency.

(d) Compliance monitoring procedures. The owner or operator of a facility subject to this section shall maintain records sufficient to demonstrate compliance with this section. At a minimum, the owner or operator shall maintain daily records of:

(1) The following parameters for each coating, thinner, component and cleaning solvent as supplied:

(i) Name and identification number.

(ii) Volume used.

(iii) Mix ratio.
(iv) Density or specific gravity.
(v) Weight percent of total volatiles, water, solids and exempt solvents.

(vi) Volume percent of solids for each Table I or Table II coating used in the surface coating process.

(2) The VOC content of each coating, thinner, component and cleaning solvent as supplied.

(3) The VOC content of each as applied coating or cleaning solvent.

(e) Recordkeeping and reporting requirements. The records required under subsection (d) shall be:

(1) Maintained for 2 years, unless a longer period is required under § 127.511(b)(2) (relating to monitoring and related recordkeeping and reporting requirements).

(2) Submitted to the Department upon receipt of a written request.

(f) Coating application methods. A person subject to this section may not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOCs from the application of large appliance or metal furniture surface coatings, unless the coatings are applied using one or more of the following coating application methods:

(1) Electrostatic coating.
(2) Roller coating.
(3) Flow coating.
(4) Dip coating, including electrodeposition.
(5) High volume-low pressure (HVLP) spray.
(6) Brush coating.
(7) Other coating application method, if approved in writing by the Department prior to use.

(i) The coating application method must be capable of achieving a transfer efficiency equivalent to or better than that achieved by the methods listed in paragraphs (1)—(6). 

### 5138 RULES AND REGULATIONS

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 40, NO. 37, SEPTEMBER 11, 2010**(ii) The request for approval must be submitted in writing.

(g) Exempt coatings and coating operations. The VOC coating content limits in Table I and Table II do not apply to the following types of coatings and coating operations:

(1) Stencil coatings.

(2) Safety-indicating coatings.

(3) Solid-film lubricants.

(4) Electric-insulating coatings.

(5) Thermal-conducting coatings.

(6) Touch-up and repair coatings.

(7) Coating applications using hand-held aerosol cans.

(8) A coating used exclusively for determining productquality and commercial acceptance and other small quantity coatings, if the coating meets the following criteria:

(i) The quantity of coating used does not exceed 50 gallons per year for a single coating and a total of 200 gallons per year for all coatings combined for the facility.

(ii) The owner or operator of the facility requests, in writing, and the Department approves, in writing, the exemption prior to use of the coating.

(h) Work practice requirements for coating-related activities. The owner or operator of a large appliance or metal furniture surface coating process subject to this section shall comply with the following work practices for coating-related activities:

(1) Store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners and coating-related waste materials in closed containers.

(2) Ensure that mixing and storage containers used for VOC-containing coatings, thinners and coating-related waste materials are kept closed at all times except when depositing or removing these materials.

(3) Minimize spills of VOC-containing coatings, thinners and coating-related waste materials and clean up spills immediately.

(4) Convey VOC-containing coatings, thinners and coating-related waste materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes.

(i) Work practice requirements for cleaning materials. The owner or operator of a large appliance or metal furniture surface coating process subject to this sectionshall comply with the following work practices for cleaning materials:

(1) Store all VOC-containing cleaning materials and used shop towels in closed containers.

(2) Ensure that mixing and storage containers used for VOC-containing cleaning materials are kept closed at alltimes except when depositing or removing these materials.

(3) Minimize spills of VOC-containing cleaning materials and clean up spills immediately.

(4) Convey VOC-containing cleaning materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes.

(5) Minimize VOC emissions from cleaning of storage, mixing and conveying equipment. Table I

Emission Limits of VOCs for Large Appliance Surface Coatings

Weight of VOC per Volume of Coating Solids, as Applied Coating Type Baked Air Dried kg/l lb/gal kg/l lb/gal
General, One

Component 0.40 3.34 0.40 3.34
General, MultiComponent 0.40 3.34 0.55 4.62 Extreme High Gloss 0.55 4.62 0.55 4.62

Extreme Performance 0.55 4.62 0.55 4.62

Heat Resistant 0.55 4.62 0.55 4.62

Metallic 0.55 4.62 0.55 4.62

Pretreatment 0.55 4.62 0.55 4.62

Solar Absorbent 0.55 4.62 0.55 4.62

Table II

Emission Limits of VOCs for Metal Furniture Surface Coatings

Weight of VOC per Volume of Coating Solids, as Applied Coating Type Baked Air Dried kg/l lb/gal kg/l lb/gal
General, One

Component 0.40 3.34 0.40 3.34
General, MultiComponent 0.40 3.34 0.55 4.62 Extreme High Gloss 0.61 5.06 0.55 4.62

Extreme Performance 0.61 5.06 0.61 5.06

Heat Resistant 0.61 5.06 0.61 5.06

Metallic 0.61 5.06 0.61 5.06

Pretreatment 0.61 5.06 0.61 5.06

Solar Absorbent 0.61 5.06 0.61 5.06

[Pa.B. Doc. No. 10-1677. Filed for public inspection September 10, 2010, 9:00 a.m.]



### ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD **[ 25 PA. CODE CH. 261a ] Hazardous Waste Management System; Exclusion** 

**for Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste**

The Environmental Quality Board (Board) amends Chapter 261a (relating to identification and listing of hazardous waste) to read as set forth in Annex A. The final-form rulemaking amends an existing hazardouswaste delisting previously granted to Geological Reclamation Operations and Waste Systems, Inc. (GROWS), whose successor by merger, Waste Management Disposal Services of Pennsylvania, Inc. (WMDSPA), petitioned the Board to increase the maximum annual volume covered by the current delisting.

This order was adopted by the Board at its meeting on June 15, 2010. 

### RULES AND REGULATIONS 5139

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 40, NO. 37, SEPTEMBER 11, 2010**