alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alabama National BanCorporation
(Alabama National) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John H. Holcomb, III, Chief Executive Officer of Alabama National, and
William E. Matthews, V, Chief Financial Officer of Alabama National, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Alabama National.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 9, 2005



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ John H. Holcomb, III  
|John H. Holcomb, III      
|Chief Executive Officer   
|                          
|/s/ William E. Matthews, V
|William E. Matthews, V    
|Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 610 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.610

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain land under the 
jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management in Washakie County and Big 
Horn County, Wyoming, to the Westside Irrigation District, Wyoming, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE.

    (a) In General.--On completion of an environmental analysis under 
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), 
the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the 
Bureau of Land Management (referred to in this Act as the 
``Secretary''), shall convey to the Westside Irrigation District, 
Wyoming (referred to in this Act as ``Westside''), all right, title, 
and interest (excluding the mineral interest) of the United States in 
and to such portions of the Federal land in Big Horn County and 
Washakie County, Wyoming, described in subsection (c), as the district 
enters into an agreement with the Secretary to purchase.
    (b) Price.--The price of the land conveyed under subsection (a) 
shall be equal to the appraised value of the land, as determined by the 
Secretary.
    (c) Land Description.--
        (1) In general.--The land referred to in subsection (a) is the 
    approximately 16,500 acres of land in Big Horn County and Washakie 
    County, Wyoming, as depicted on the map entitled ``Westside 
    Project'' and dated May 9, 2000.
        (2) Adjustment.--On agreement of the Secretary and Westside, 
    acreage may be added to or subtracted from the land to be conveyed 
    as necessary to satisfy any mitigation requirements under the 
    National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (d) Use of Proceeds.--Proceeds of the sale of land under subsection 
(a) shall be deposited in a special account in the Treasury of the 
United States and shall be available to the Secretary of the Interior, 
without further Act of appropriation, for the acquisition of land and 
interests in land in the Worland District of the Bureau of Land 
Management in the State of Wyoming that will benefit public recreation, 
public access, fish and wildlife habitat, or cultural resources.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 177 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10681]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The Honorable Mark L. Pryor led the Pledge of Allegiance, as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                     MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward B. Lipkin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property
Analysts Master Limited Partnership;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2005

By: EBL&S, Inc., its managing general partner

By: /s/ Edward B. Lipkin
    ------------------------
    Name: Edward B. Lipkin
    Title: President
# C_2019122EN.01002101.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/21

---

Action brought on 31 January 2019 — Rot Front v EUIPO — Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (РОШЕН)

(Case T-63/19)

(2019/C 122/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rot Front OAO (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: M. Geitz and J. Stock, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (Kiev, Ukraine)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark РОШЕН — International registration designating the European Union No 11 233 784

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2018 in Case R 1872/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 94(1), 47(5) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 94(1), 47(5) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOUND PAGES 2 AND 3 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,482,728
<SECURITIES>                                   490,577
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,807,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,750,987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,908,181
<PP&E>                                       5,311,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                 878,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,341,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,995,231
<BONDS>                                      7,447,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,408
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,823,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,341,609
<SALES>                                     19,513,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,513,117
<CGS>                                       14,694,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,694,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,954,435
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             255,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,748,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,030,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,718,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,718,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Includes addback of after-tax interest expense for convertible debentures.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Simon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property
Analysts Master Limited Partnership ("NPAMLP");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 10, 2006

By: EBL&S Property Management Inc.,
    Agent for NPAMLP


By: /s/ David A. Simon
    ---------------------------------
Name: David A. Simon
Title: Vice President and
       Chief Financial Officer
COFFEE PEOPLE, INC.

                       CALCULATIONS OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                        Three Months Ended March 31,
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                                     1997                         1996
                             -----------------------      ----------------------
                             Primary      Fully Dil.      Primary     Fully Dil.
Weighted average shares
 outstanding for the
 period                     3,238,938     3,238,939       1,984,968    1,984,968

Dilutive common stock
 options using the
 treasury stock method         32,246        33,688          48,374       48,374


Total shares used for per
 share calculations         3,271,184      3,272,627      2,033,342    2,033,342

 Net income                $ (190,000)   $ (190,000)     $   66,000   $   66,000

 Earnings per share        $     (.06)   $     (.06)     $      .03   $      .03
#### O’Neil, Plaintiff and Appellant, vs. Russell, Defendant: Hartford Exchange Bank, Garnishee and Respondent; Sullivan, Administratrix, Intervenor, Appellant.

*December 7, 1928*

January *8, 1929.*

*10The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *O’Meara & O’Meara*of West Bend, and for the respondent on that of *Sawyer & Gehl*of Hartford.

Stevens, J.

The money of Mr. Sullivan had been so mingled in the bank account with that of other investors that it was not possible to trace any of his money to the fund in the bank when the garnishee summons was served. It was not the intention of the parties that the identical funds belonging to Mr. Sullivan should be returned to him. On the contrary it was the intent to accept in place of the money the written obligations to repay these sums in the form of checks. The relationship created by their course of dealing was the same as it would have been if Mr. Russell, instead of issuing checks, had sent his promissory notes. In either case the ■relationship of debtor and creditor would have been created.

When money, sent to an agent for investment, is deposited in the agent’s account and is so mingled with other funds that it cannot be traced or identified, the investor cannot claim the fund as the beneficiary of a trust. In such case he has only the rights of a general creditor. *Henry v. Mar*
      *11
      *tin,*88 Wis. 367, 368, 60 N. W. 263; *Gianella v. Momsen,*90 Wis. 476, 478, 63 N. W. 1018. In order to establish the right to claim that the money constitutes a trust fund, the fund must be traced to and identified in some existing fund or property. *Union State Bank v. Peoples State Bank,*192 Wis. 28, 34, 211 N. W. 931. “When trust money becomes so mixed up with the trustee’s individual funds that it is impossible to trace and identify it as entering into some specific property, the trust ceases.” *Bromley v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. R. Co.*103 Wis. 562, 568, 79 N. W. 741. See, also, *Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Flanders,*87 Wis. 237, 242, 58 N. W. 383.

The evidence shows conclusively that the parties did not contemplate that the same identical money received by the defendant Russell was to be returned to the intervenor, but only that a like sum should be paid on demand. These transactions were in the nature of loans which created the relationship of debtor and creditor. *Shoemaker v. Hinze,*53 Wis. 116, 117, 10 N. W. 86.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
#### Weber v. Hamilton et al.

1. Mayors’ Courts: territorial jurisdiction. Section 506 of the Code construed, and *held*to give to the mayors of cities and towns territorial;! urisdiction, in civil as well as criminal cases, co-extensive with the counties in which their cities and towns are severally situated.

*Appeal from JTeoI&uh Cirouit Court.*

Thursday, October 13.

ActioN for an injunction to restrain the defendant Hamilton, as mayor of the town of Sigourney, and his successors *578in office, from enforcing a certain judgment rendered against tbe plaintiff in tbe mayor’s court. A temporary injunction was granted, and on motion it was dissolved. From the order dissolving the injunction tbe plaintiff appeals.

*Smith &*Talley, for appellant.

*A. G.*Sehulte, for appellees.

Adams, Ch. J.

Tbe question in this case comes to us upon a certificate, which is in these words: “In a case brought by a resident within the corporate limits of the incorporated town of Sigourney, before the mayor of such corporation, against a resident of the county, but not of the corporation nor of the township in which it is situated, by notice served upon the defendant in the township of his residence, but not served within the limits of such corporation or the township where situated, upon a demand for work and labor for less than one hundred dollars, where defendant makes default, has the mayor jurisdiction?” In reply to this question, we have to say that we think that the mayor has jurisdiction in such case. It is not denied that a justice of the peace would have jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of a mayor is conferred by section 506 of the Code, and is in these words: “The majrnr of each city or incorporated town shall be a magistrate and conservator of the peace, and within the same, have the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace in all matters, civil and criminal; * * * but the criminal jurisdiction hereby conferred shall be co-extensive with the county in which such city or town is situated.”

The plaintiff’s position is that the first part of the section is designed to provide that the mayor shall have the same jurisdiction as a justice of the peace, so far as the kind of proceedings and the amount are concerned, and was not designed to extend his civil jurisdiction to persons beyond his city or incorporated town, and that this appears from the i.ast clause, which expressly makes the mayor’s criminal *579jurisdiction co-extensive with the county. But, in our opinion, the iast clause is added for greater certainty and explicitness. The first clause, if taken by itself, seems to give the mayor the same jurisdiction as a justice of the peace, and we do not think that we should be justified in holding it to be less in civil cases, by reason of any implication which might be thought to arise from the last clause. Ve have no doubt that mayors have frequently taken jurisdiction in cases like this, and we feel somewhat reluctant to adopt a construction so doubtful as that contended for, which might render void many judgments now relied upon.

AFFIRMED.
TYRECE LYNN COX NO. IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPELLANT, 

### vs. MAR 09 2015 STATE OF TEXAS. APPELLEE. APPELLANTS MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE A PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 1. Appellant's has beeninformed that his appeal has been aflBrmed andmandate has been issued on February 12, 2015 in the First Court ofAppeal bearing cause number 01-13- 00565-CR. 

### 2. The gist of the Appellant's motion is that he is withoutthe necessary tools to perfect 

### his PDR such as court records of the proceedings and it would be impossible for the FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS Appellant to have hisPDR submitted within the mandatory thirty(30) days. 3. Appellant counters that no party or partyininterest wouldbe prejudiced by thisAbel Acosta, Clerk Motion and that the interest of justice so require that this court extend the time to 

### allow the Appellant to seek from theDistrict Court or former counsel courtrecords to perfect the PDR. WHEREFORE PREMISE CONSIDERED, Appellant pray that this motion be granted. Respectfully submitted, Tyrece Lynn Cox #01857602 1391 FM 3328 Tennessee Colony, Texas 75880 

# RECEIVED IN?.

CERTTFJCATE OF SERVICE 

### A trueand correct copy of theforegoing wasmailed this 5th day ofMarch 2015 postage prepaid by placing same in mail and copy mailed to the Clerk ofthe Court ofthe Texas Court ofCriminal Appeals and the Office ofthe District Attorney Galveston County 

### located at 600 59th Street, Ste. 1001, Galveston, Texas 77551 Tyrece Lynn Cox0! <b 

# * 153 0 

# I 1 u 

# I ^ II ^ t .ft

i

c



## 3 

# 1 J M 

# SS) A Is 

### r )



## *

0

S3 ^ 

# ri:S2

.ii S 2' rs" o ft r- ft %