alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##  	  Review Commission Launches Open Government Web Page

**Review Commission Launches Open Government Web Page**

In response to the Obama Administration’s Open Government Directive, the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) has launched its Open Government Web Page at https://www.oshrc.gov/open/commission.html.  Here, you will find a collection of data sets not previously made available online by the Review Commission.  By introducing this online platform, the Commission hopes to improve public knowledge of the agency’s operations and enhance agency accountability.  The new data sets include reports on the Commission’s monthly case docket, monthly case activity, and briefing notices issued by the Commission. 

The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission is an independent Federal agency tasked with adjudicating disputes between the Department of Labor, employers, and employees arising from contested workplace safety inspections.

The information found on the new OSHRC Open Government page can also be accessed through www.Data.gov - a compendium of Federal Agency data sets.  

“We remain committed to carrying out the Obama Administration’s mission of institutionalizing a culture of openness and transparency within government,” said Commission Chairman Thomasina Rogers.  “The launch of this Web Page represents our ongoing commitment to harnessing new technology and making information about the Review Commission’s operations more available to the public.”  

Detailed information on the three data sets is as follows:

**Monthly Case Docket**at****https://www.oshrc.gov/open/CommMonDocRpt.html.This data set contains a list of all active cases pending before the Review Commissioners at the end of each month.  This report will be updated monthly.

**Monthly Case Activity**This data set details the monthly activity on cases pending before the Commission which includes: total cases pending at the beginning of the month, total cases added to the docket during the month, total cases disposed of during the month, and total cases pending at the end of the month.  This report set will be updated monthly, with the first report for January 2010 posted shortly after January 31.

**Briefing Notices**at****https://www.oshrc.gov/open/CommBriefNotice.html.This data set contains the briefing notices issued by the Commission.  This report will be updated as new briefing notices are issued.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      11,773,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,347,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,487
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,417,542
<PP&E>                                      86,076,188
<DEPRECIATION>                              67,475,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,125,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,437,622
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (55,311,671)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,125,951
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,936,542
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,330,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,763,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,176,530)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,176,530)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             15,887,169
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,710,639
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
"THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JANUARY 23, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND APRIL 25,
1999 AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THIRTY-NINE
WEEKS ENDED JANUARY 23, 2000 AND JANUARY 24, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000926295
<NAME> BOSTON RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-23-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                       1,213,114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    274,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,582,494
<PP&E>                                       8,292,275
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,994,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,100,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,613,941
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,352
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,381,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,100,020
<SALES>                                     10,959,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,995,246
<CGS>                                        2,222,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,694,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             271,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                135,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   135,810
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20493

 

CLAUDE HOWARD JONES,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS 

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(97-CV-2885) 

 

March 1, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court granted Director Johnson’s motion for

summary judgment, denied Claude Howard Jones’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus, and granted a certificate of appealability. Jones

brings three issues in his appeal. His first argument rests on the

retroactivity of the State of Texas’s shift in the definition of

reasonable doubt. It presents no question of constitutional

magnitude. 

Jones next urges error in the admission at trial of expert

opinion testimony by State’s witnesses which “embraced the ultimate
2

issue” of the case. Jones points, for example, to the admission

into evidence of the opinion testimony of Ranger Tommy Walker

expressing the opinion that a robbery had occurred. We find no

error of constitutional magnitude in these evidentiary rulings. 

Finally, Jones argues that there is insufficient evidence to

support a conviction of capital murder. The argument focuses on

the question of whether the State offered sufficient evidence that

Jones murdered Mr. Hilzendager, the proprietor of the liquor store,

in the course of a robbery, as well as the sufficiency of the

evidence that Jones was the culprit. We find the evidence

sufficient. 

There was evidence that the robbery occurred at approximately

6:00 to 6:30 p.m., nearly three hours before the scheduled closing

time. The till had been removed from the cash drawer and contained

no paper money. A part-time employee testified that it would be

unusual to have no paper money during store hours. 

Finally, the evidence of identification, as well as testimony

regarding statements by the defendant that he had killed

Hilzendager, is more than sufficient to support the jury’s belief

that Jones was the culprit. 

The stay of execution is VACATED, and the judgment of the

district court dismissing the petition is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 99c

  EXHIBIT (99)(c) CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF JAMES CABLE
             FINANCE CORP. FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of James
Cable Finance Corp. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2003                                /s/ William R. James
                                                   --------------------
                                                   William R. James
                                                   President
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)

The foregoing certification accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Report of Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation (the "Registrants") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies with respect to each registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated as of March 14, 2005
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By /s/ Wm. Michael Warren, Jr.                  | 
|----------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                | 
|Wm. Michael Warren, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer | 



|By /s/ G. C. Ketcham                  | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|                                      | 
|G. C. Ketcham
Chief Financial Officer | 

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation and will be retained by Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### In re Disch: Disch, Respondent, vs. Wisconsin Power & Light Company, Appellant.

*October 7*

November *8, 1940.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Schubring, Ryan, Petersen & Sutherland*of Madison, and oral argument by *William Ryan.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Blum & Blum*of Monroe and *McGowan & Geffs*of Janesville, and oral argument by *Jacob Geffs*and *George S. Geffs.*

Fritz, J.

In so far as the questions involved on this appeal are concerned, the material facts and the proceedings and rulings of the trial court, which resulted in the judgment under review and are involved under appellant’s assign*65ments of error, are substantially the same as in the companion case No. 51, entitled *In re*Hefty, *ante,*p. 60, 294 N. W. 518, which is decided herewith. Under these circumstances and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in case No. 51, the judgment herein must likewise be reversed and a new trial ordered.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed/and cause remanded with directions to grant appellant’s motion for a new trial.
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 366 

Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of Lunar New Year. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2016 

Mr. COONS (for himself, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. REID, Mr. KIRK, and Mr. RUBIO) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of Lunar 

New Year. 

Whereas Lunar New Year begins on the second new moon 

following the winter solstice, or the first day of the new 

year according to the lunisolar calendar, and extends 

until the full moon 15 days later; 

Whereas February 8, 2016, marks the first day of Lunar 

New Year for calendar year 2016; 

Whereas the 15th day of the new year, according to the 

lunisolar calendar, is called the Lantern Festival; 

Whereas Lunar New Year is often referred to as ‘‘Spring 

Festival’’ in various Asian countries; 

Whereas many religious and ethnic communities use lunarbased calendars; 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 366 ATS 

Whereas Lunar New Year began in China more than 4,000 

years ago and is widely celebrated in East and Southeast 

Asia; 

Whereas the Asian diaspora has expanded the Lunar New 

Year celebration into an annual worldwide event; 

Whereas Lunar New Year is celebrated by millions of Asian 

Americans, and by many non-Asian Americans, in the 

United States; 

Whereas Lunar New Year is celebrated with community activities and cultural performances; 

Whereas participants celebrating Lunar New Year travel to 

spend the holiday reuniting with family and friends; and 

Whereas Lunar New Year is traditionally a time to wish others good fortune, health, prosperity, and happiness: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the cultural and historical signifi3 cance of Lunar New Year; 

4 (2) in observance of Lunar New Year, expresses 

5 its deepest respect for Asian Americans and all indi6 viduals throughout the world who celebrate this sig7 nificant occasion; and 

8 (3) wishes Asian Americans and all individuals 

9 who observe this holiday a happy and prosperous 

10 new year. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-00395), Form S-3 (File No. 333-43245) and
Forms S-8 (File No. 33-27869, File No. 33-46641, File No. 33-48504, File No.
33-48505, File No. 33-26111, and File No. 33-45107) of Energen Corporation of
our report dated October 25, 2000 relating to the consolidated financial
statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated October 25, 2000 relating to the
financial statement schedule of Energen Corporation, which appears in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
December 8, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner,
Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of Diversified Futures Trust I (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                            
|Maureen D. Howley                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2006
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10634]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               PROTECTIVE FORESTS AND WILDLIFE IN SUMATRA

  Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I want to take a moment to call attention 
to the recent action of the Government of Indonesia to preserve the 
endangered rain forests an ecosystems of Sumatra.
  On October 10, 2008, the Indonesian Government, in cooperation with 
the World Wildlife Fund, WWF, announced an agreement between the 10 
provincial governors of Sumatra to protect biodiversity on the world's 
sixth largest island. Although long overdue, this is an important first 
step towards conservation of a unique habitat at a critical time.
  Sumatra is the only place on Earth where tigers, elephants, rhinos, 
and orangutans co-exist. It has also gained a reputation for having 
lost almost half of its natural forest cover since 1985. The rapid 
expansion of palm oil and pulpwood plantations, as well as rampant 
illegal logging, have been largely to blame. These activities have 
contributed to the precipitous decline in numbers of these endangered 
species, whose habitat has become a patchwork of disconnected small 
parcels of forest.
  This action to protect the forests is important not only for 
Indonesia but for the rest of the world. Thirteen percent of 
Indonesia's remaining forests grow on peat soil, which emits large 
amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when trees are felled. 
Further destruction of these forests will contribute to global warming 
at a time when we should be doing everything possible to reduce 
greenhouse gases.
  This agreement represents a significant change of attitude and 
policy, for which President Yudhoyono and his government deserve 
credit. Implementing the agreement will be difficult, requiring 
additional resources for alternative economic opportunities for people 
living in these areas, and for enforcement, and I urge the U.S. Agency 
for International Development and other donors to support it.

                          ____________________
```
# Quad Copter L

. L 

# k and Maintenance

I ni

t i a l D u ra t i on Kema mm g Ba tt e ry Ca pa c i ty U s ed U s ed C h a r g e Max Rng !U s e Ra t e

V o l t s % M inu te s Vo l ta g e % 

### # of m a h m ah % 

## v % m i n u te s amp s/s I W ea t h e r M i ss i o n / Co o

. ...**"~** 

# . . .**"' "'** **"**
Final Notes July 9, 2010 

### Steam Study Data Review Notes

Chloride and Sulfate EPA Method 300 .0 ( Ion Chromatography )

1. If residual chlorine dio xide is suspected in sample, the sample should be purged with an

iner t gas for at least five minutes (300.0/4.8)

.

2. S amples containing particle s larger than 0.45 μm and reagents containing particles larger than 0.2 μm should be filtered prior to analysis (300.0/4.4)

.

3. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 5 times the analyte concentration

in t he laboratory reagent blank, the resu lt should be reported as a nondetect . List all affected samples:

4. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 10 times but greater than 5 times the analyte concentration in the laboratory reagent blank, the result should be reported as

an estima ted value. List all affected samples: