alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THIRD AMENDMENT TO LINE OF CREDIT
                        ---------------------------------
                               DATED APRIL 3, 2000
                               -------------------
                                                            Dated: July 23, 2001


This  Amendment is to the Line of Credit dated April 3, 2000, as amended May 24,
2000  and  April 9, 2001.  This amendment extends the line of credit to November
30, 2001 and retains the amount of the line of credit at $350,000 [Three Hundred
Fifty  Thousand].  The  items  listed below supersede such items in the April 3,
2000 Line of Credit agreement as amended on May 24, 2000 and April 9, 2001.  All
other  items  remain  as  stated  in  the  previous  agreements.

     FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED, Telesoft Corp ("Maker") promises to repay to --------
("Holder")  the  principal  advances  received  plus interest at the rate of ten
percent  per  annum,  in  United  States  currency,  payable  as  follows:

1.   Principal  and  interest  shall  be  all  due  on  November  30,  2001.

     Interest shall accrue from the date hereof at the rate of ten percent (10%)
     per  annum  and  is  due  monthly.

2.   This  Line  of  Credit  is  due and payable on before November 30, 2001. If
     payment is not made by this date, this Line of Credit will be considered in
     default  by  Holder, without notice to Maker. Interest will begin to accrue
     on  the  defaulted Note at the rate of fifteen percent (15%) per annum, and
     will  continue to accrue until such time that the Line of Credit is paid in
     full.

3.   This  Line  of  Credit  is  secured  by  the  Maker's  accounts receivable,
     inventory,  property  plant  and equipment and all other assets held by the
     Maker.  Should  the  Maker  enter  into  a  financing  agreement  from  a
     non-affiliate,  the  Holder  shall  take  a  subordinate  position  in this
     security.  A  UCC  filing  for  this  security  interest  has  been  filed.

     IN  WINTNESS  WHEREOF, Maker has executed this instrument in his respective
     Name,  and on his behalf, and has set his hand hereunto, all as of the date
     first  Written  above.  This  document  shall  have  the effect of a sealed
     instrument.

       ________________________________________________________________



     ________________________________           ______________________________

     Telesoft  Corp                              ----------------------
     By  ___________________


<PAGE>
Ex Parte Meeting Report
Date: 9 March 2011 Time: 9:00-10:00 a.m. Eastern Location: U.S. Department of Energy Organizer: Ken Salaets, Director, Inform ation Technology Industry Council Purpose: To discuss industry concerns regardi ng the impact of new battery charger efficiency standards for units that power Unlimited Power Supply units. Attendees

Name Affiliation Victor Petrolati US De partment of Energy Matthew Nardotti Navigant Consulting David Cassano Apple Steven Kuo Apple Jay Taylor APC by Schneider-Electric James Spitaels APC by Schneider-Electric Rona Newmark EMC (by phone) Martin Marzinelli HP (by phone) James Kardach Intel Corporation Henry Wong Intel Corporation Roy Wood Kodak (by phone) Ken Salaets Information Technology Industry Council Meeting Summary

• DOE expects to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the next few months that will propose energy efficiency standards for external power supplies (EPS) and battery chargers (BC). Uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) will be one of the product categories covered. This action is required by July 1, 2011 according to statute. The effective date for the EPS standard is two years after publication. The statute did not specify a date for a BC standard, but DOE is likely to issue one in the same timeframe.

• The test procedure for BCs will be finalized in the next month or so, and will likely be modeled after the test procedures being es tablished by the California Energy Commission (CEC) for the same products.2

2 • Industry expressed concern about the standard’s applicabil ity to commercial-grade UPS units. DOE said that the scope of the standard will be limited to consumer UPS units, although the definition of “consumer” is somewhat ambiguous.

• Industry also raised concerns about the pending testing standard, particularly in terms of its potential to constrain addi tional functionality. DOE indicat ed that the opportunity to express formal comments on the testing rulemaking had closed, but indicated that industry could raise the issu e as part of comments on the BSC/BC proposed rule. Next Steps

• Industry will include in future comments recommendations on how to effectively delineate between commercial- and consumer-focused products.
EXHIBIT
32.b
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADDED BY
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Community Bancshares, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard H. Flake,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the
Report.
 
 
 /s/
Richard H. Flake
 Richard
H. Flake
 Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 Date: August 8,
2008
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of
Diversified Futures Trust I (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer     
|Kenneth A. Shewer         
|Co-Chief Executive Officer
|August 12, 2005
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 407 

Congratulating the University of Wyoming men’s Nordic ski team for winning 

the 38th annual United States Collegiate Ski and Snowboard Association 

national championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2016 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. BARRASSO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the University of Wyoming men’s Nordic ski 

team for winning the 38th annual United States Collegiate Ski and Snowboard Association national championship. 

Whereas, on March 12, 2016, the University of Wyoming 

men’s Nordic ski team won the 2016 United States Collegiate Ski and Snowboard Association (referred to in this 

preamble as the ‘‘USCSA’’) national championship in 

Lake Placid, New York, by sweeping all 4 events; 

Whereas the University of Wyoming men’s Nordic ski team 

has won consecutive USCSA national titles; 

Whereas as members on the University of Wyoming Nordic 

ski teams, Will Timmons won the 2016 USCSA men’s inVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:56 Mar 17, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR407.ATS SR407

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 407 ATS 

dividual title and Elise Sulser won the 2016 USCSA 

women’s individual title; 

Whereas the University of Wyoming men’s Nordic ski team 

placed 3 men among the top 10 overall individual finishers at the 2016 USCSA national event; 

Whereas co-head coaches Christi Boggs and Rachel Watson 

have successfully guided the University of Wyoming 

men’s and women’s Nordic ski teams to multiple USCSA 

national titles; 

Whereas the University of Wyoming men’s and women’s Nordic ski teams have each won 6 team USCSA national titles between 2003 and 2016: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the University of Wyoming 

3 men’s Nordic ski team as the winner of the 2016 

4 United States Collegiate Ski and Snowboard Asso5 ciation national championship; 

6 (2) commends the athletes, coaches, parents, 

7 and staff of the University of Wyoming Nordic ski 

8 teams for their hard work and dedication; 

9 (3) recognizes the students, alumni, and loyal 

10 fans that supported the University of Wyoming 

11 men’s Nordic ski team on the team’s journey to win 

12 another national title; and 

13 (4) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

14 the Senate prepare an official copy of this resolution 

15 for presentation to— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 407 ATS 

1 (A) the president of the University of Wyo2 ming; 

3 (B) the athletic director of the University 

4 of Wyoming; and 

5 (C) the co-head coaches of the University 

6 of Wyoming Nordic ski teams. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE on the relation of W. R. COX, Solicitor v. NICHOLAS PEEBLES, Guardian, and others.

Confederate money taken in good faith, should he received at its scaled value, in all fiduciary transactions: Therefore, a Guardian who paid the taxes due from his Ward’s estate, with his own Confederate money, can only receive credit for the value thereof according to the Legislative scale.

Good faith requires that any profit which arises from a transaction of the Guardian in the management of the Ward’s estate, must be for the benefit of the Ward, and not of the Guardian.

Civil action, (on a guardian bond and for tbe removal of a guardian,) tried before Albertson, *J.,*at tbe Fall Term, 1873, of the Superior Court of Nobthampton county.

During the pendency of the suit it was referred to a commissioner to state an account between the guardian and his ward, who at Fall Term, 1873, reported the stated account.

The guardian, one of the defendants, and the other defendants, sureties on his guardian bond, filed exceptions to the report of the referee or commissioner, for the reason, that he had credited in the account, the scaled value of certain moneys paid by the guardian in 1862 ’63 and ’64 for his ward, instead oí allowing the whole amounts of such several payments.

His Honor overruled the defendants’ exceptions, confirmed the report of the referee, and gave judgment for the amount stated to be due. From this judgment defendants appealed to this Court.

Barnes, for appellants.

*Busbee <&*Busbee, contra.

Settle, J.

Should a guardian who paid the taxes on the estate of his ward during the war, out of his (the guardian’s) own Confederate money, be allowed in a settlement with his ward the full amount of such payments, or should they be *11scaled to the value of the Confederate, money so paid *\*Had the gnardian received in good faith Confederate money for his ward before it became so depreciated as to amount to notice, that it would not be received, he would have been liable only for the value of the Confederate money at the time of its receipt. With this principle another goes hand in hand, to-wit; that where the guardian used his own Confederate money in the payment of debts against his ward, he should be allowed only the value of such money. To hold otherwise would violate, the fundamental principle that aguardian shall not be allowed to speculate upon the estate of his ward. .

Hood faith requires that any profit which flows from a transaction of the guardian, in respect to the ward’s estate, must be for the benefit of the ward, and not for. the guardian.

The spirit of our decision is, that Confederate money taken in good faith should be received at its scaled value in all fiduciary transactions, and indeed in all transaetions.exeept where the parties dealt directly with each other and at arms’ length; as for instance, where a debtor tenders and a creditor receives Confederate money in payment of a debt, each dealing *suojure„*In such case we have held that the payment amounts to a discharge of the debt.

The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.

Pee CubxaM. Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Arctic Research Commission

# ACTION:

Notice of vacancy.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given, pursuant to public law, which states that any vacancy occurring in the membership of the Commission shall be filled, after notice of the vacancy is published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , in the manner in which the original appointment was made, for the remainder of the unexpired term. This notice is published to comply with the aforesaid requirement.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Debra Dickson, Administrative Officer, Arctic Research Commission, 703-235-1040.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984 (Title I, Pub. L. 98-373) and the Presidential Executive Order on Arctic Research (Executive Order 12501) dated January 28, 1985, established the United States Arctic Research Commission and provides the authority for this notice.

Debra L. Dickson,

Administrative Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-25860 Filed 11-6-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
•"EPARTMEMTOF 

mmcmnoH 

•nCKET OPERATIONS 

Docket Management Facility '/(]"} i^rq M , n • T 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation J\lh:\5, U p r ^ j 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

West Building Grand Floor, Room W-120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

February?, 2012 

RE: Sun Country slot exemption Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

We strongly support and use the non-stop, near-daily Sun Country Airline flights that 

currently operate between Lansing, Michigan and Washington DC, Reagan. Our use to 

dale has been personal as we have family in the Washington DC area and the Sun 

Country flights have been ideal - extremely convenient with friendly service and 

competitive fares. We foresee additional fijture use for our business purposes. 

We realize the issue involves Department of Transportation precedent in awarding takeoffand landing rights at Reagan. We sincerely hope this matter can be resolved in a 

manner that would allow the non-stop, near-daily service from Lansing to Washington 

Reagan to continue. It's important to us, personally, as well as for business travel from 

throughout the mid-Michigan area. 

Thank you for your consideration of this request. 

Sincere!' 

^^^f^^jM r 

__Ray and Pat Ha^inmerschmidt 

5225 Blue Haven Drive 

East Lansing, Ml 48823 

Cc: Senator Debbie Stabenow 

Senator Carl Levin 

Congressman Mike Rogers
#### GEORGE W. LOGAN v. JOHN H. WILKINS.

Where a plaintiff in an attachment recovered judgment against the defendant therein, for the amount of his debt, and at the same term, a judgment was rendered on the replevy bond of the defendant, which was subsequently stricken out: *Held^*that striking out the judgment on the replevy bond, did not disturb or vacate the first judgment against the defendant in the attachment

Attachment, tried before *Watts, J.,*at the Fall Term, 1874, of Hendeeson Superior Court, having been removed thereto, upon affidavit, from the county of Rutherford.

The plaintiff on the 4th December, 1867, sued out of the Superior Court of Rutherford county, au attachment against the defendant, which was duly levied on both real and personal property. The suit was afterwards removed to Henderson Superior Court. The defendant at a subsequent term, appeared and gave a replevy bond, which being accepted by the Court, he was allowed to plead.

At Fall Term, 1870, of Henderson Superior Court, the plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant for $2,809.65 with interest and costs; and at the same term, on motion, judgment was rendered on the replevy bond in favor of the plaintiff, for $5,000, to be discharged upon the payment of the said $2,809.65, &c. From this latter judgment, the sureties on the replevy bond, appealed to the Supreme Court. During the same term, however, the judgment on the bond being stricken out, the appeal was not prosecuted.

On the trial in the court below, it was insisted by the defendant, that the order of the court at Fall Term, 1870, striking out the judgment against the sureties on the replevy bond, had the effect of striking out the first judgment against the defendant in the attachment. His Honor was of opinion, that *50the order had no such effect. Erom this ruling, the defendant appealed.

*Shipp (& Bailey,*for defendant.

*Smith <& Strong, Hargrove, J. H. Merrimon,*and *J. G. L. Harris,*contra.

Reads, J.

We agree with his Honoi’ that the striking out the judgment against the defendants upon the replevy bond, did not have the effect to disturb the judgment which had been rendered against the principal debtor Wilkins, for the debt. And that being the only matter appealed from, the judgment must be affirmed.

There is no error.

Pee CuRiam, Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q of Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter
      ended January 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuoliang Wang, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                August 11, 2008/s/
                Zuoliang WangBy:
            Zuoliang
                WangInterim
                Chief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Renhuang Pharmaceuticals,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         491,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                     93,625
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,029,288
<PP&E>                                      12,154,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,884,677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,510,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,168,832
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,810
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,310,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,510,456
<SALES>                                        553,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,636,785
<CGS>                                          265,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,995,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                627,426
<INCOME-TAX>                                   100,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            527,426
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   527,426
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>