### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls). Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets. Boiler Information Worksheet 1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration. Emission Data Worksheets The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets: Boiler Operation Information 1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field. Fuel Information 1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg 0 

### and , HgP, and Hg +2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

4833100012 Sandow 5 Generating Plant 5BControl Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICRListed (by boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICREIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 4833100012 Sandow 5 Generating Plant 5B

1 3/9/2010 1702 2 3/10/2010 1301 3 3/11/2010 1234 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) 3/9/2010 1927 0.21 Wet 3/10/2010 1521 0.18 Wet 3/11/2010 1454 0.2 Wet Methane Emission Test Results

Test End Time Test End DateTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu U.S. EPA Method 18 ADL 1.27E-04 U.S. EPA Method 18 ADL 1.12E-04 U.S. EPA Method 18 ADL 1.23E-04 Methane Emission Test Results Calculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O 2 0.2 1977 2484 19.67 16.22 3.27 579345 0.18 1993 2487 20.47 15.94 3.31 563279 0.2 1990 2480 19.76 16.08 3.39 580823 Flue Gas O 2(%) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method 192 5544 lignite ton/day gas fuel meter 194 5616 lignite ton/day gas fuel meter 193 5592 lignite ton/day gas fuel meter Other Supporting Information Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Fuel #1EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 4833100012 Sandow 5 Generating Plant 5B

1 3/9/2010 1710 2 3/10/2010 1305 3 3/11/2010 1215 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Me asured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

3/9/2010 1915 7.62 Dry 3/10/2010 1505 8.63 Dry 3/11/2010 1415 6.69 Dry

Test End Time Test End DatePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 5.57E-06 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 6.31E-06 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 4.92E-06 Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results
Based on values in previous test, only a 3 point traverse was required. Spike recovery

for Runs 2 & 3 were 168 & 136%, respectively . According to the method, these runs are invalid because the

recovery was >115%.1977 2484 19.67 16.22 3.27 579345 192 1993 2487 20.47 15.94 3.31 563279 194 1990 2480 19.76 16.08 3.39 580823 193 Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Temperature (F)QA /QC Documentation Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Trap ID

5544 lignite ton/day gas fuel meter 66679 5616 lignite ton/day gas fuel meter 66689 5592 lignite ton/day gas fuel meter 66638

Fuel #1 Other Supporting InformationQA /QC Documentation Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng) Total

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng) Sample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit
605.2 0.5 605.7 100 505.7 0.065789 0 665.9 0.1 666 100 566 0.061624 0 579.4 0 579.4 100 479.4 0.069051 0 Trap #1

≤20% of field

recovery testBreaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike
0.082617317 7.686695344 55734 463 1.1 464.4 0 0.01501727 9.184733221 55725 470.7 0 470.7 0

0 6.94269453 55742 417.8 0 417.8 0 ≤10% of Section 1 Hg ma ss for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 μg/dscmTotal NonSpike Sample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit
464.4 0.061388 6.69 0.237580994 470.7 0.058289 5.44 0 417.8 0.064994 5.88 0 ≤20% of field recovery test Trap #2

≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 μg/dscmConcentration

(μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec R (%) by Run Ravg(%)
7.564996416 0.121699 0.797937 9.21 108 8.07528007 1.109453 6.427881 10.81 168 6.428285688 0.514409 3.847204 8.39 136 Me asured Spike Recovery ( R )

137.3333333 Paired Trap Agreement (RD)

≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or ≤20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 μg/dscmLimit
Note: Mercury concentration greater than expected concentration. Average Recovery, between 85 and 115% Me asured Spike Recovery ( R )EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 4833100012 Sandow 5 Generating Plant 5B

1 3/9/2010 1700 3/9/2010

2 3/10/2010 1305 3/10/2010

3 3/11/2010 1220 3/11/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

2015 <0.02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod

1620 <0.02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod

1535 0.02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod

. Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments

BDL

BDL

ADL 

### Temperature dipped slightly below 248 degF for approximately 30 minutes, which can cause a low bias in measurement. Samples were collected in combined train with HCN, which is contrary to more recent EPA recommendations posted on ICR FAQ page. The pH at receipt of the trains was not recorded by the lab. All 3 trains were below pH 12 on the Sandow 5B Boiler tests, and these tests were performed similarly

the week before. Therefore, the pH was likely not maintained above 12 either, which may result in a low bias. Method 26A was modified as originally specified by

EPA and did not require field blanks. Therefore, a field blank was not reported. Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results<1.51E-05 1977 2484 19.67 16.22 3.27 579345

<1.50E-05 1993 2487 20.47 15.94 3.31 563279

1.85E-05 1990 2480 19.76 16.08 3.39 580823 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method

192 5544 lignite ton/day gas fuel meter

194 5616 lignite ton/day gas fuel meter

193 5592 lignite ton/day gas fuel meter Other Supporting Information Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1