### 26712 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules

1 76 FR 71798 (Nov. 18, 2011). 2 On November 5, 2012, the FCA enacted final regulations governing investment management at Farmer Mac. This final rule amended §§ 652.10, 652.15, 652.25, 652.30, and 652.45. See 77 FR 66375. In a later phase of this rulemaking, we plan to enact a final rule pertaining to eligible investments that Farmer Mac may purchase and
hold.

3 The four definitions pertaining to liquidity are ‘‘Cash,’’ ‘‘Contingency Funding Plan,’’ ‘‘Liquidity Maturity Management Plan,’’ and ‘‘Liquidity

reserve.’’ **DATES :**  Please send your comments to us on or before June 7, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  We offer a variety of methods for you to submit comments on this proposed rule. For accuracy and efficiency reasons, commenters are encouraged to submit comments by email or through the Agency’s Web site. As facsimiles (fax) are difficult for us to process and achieve compliance with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, we are no longer accepting comments submitted by fax. Regardless of the method you use, please do not submit your comment multiple times via different methods. You may submit comments by any of the following
methods:

• Email: Send us an email at regcomm@fca.gov.

• FCA Web site: http://www.fca.gov. Select ‘‘Public Commenters,’’ then ‘‘Public Comments,’’ and follow the directions for ‘‘Submitting a Comment.’’

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Mail: Laurie A. Rea, Director, Office of Secondary Market Oversight, Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, VA 22102–5090.

You may review copies of all
comments we receive at our office in McLean, Virginia, or on our Web site at http://www.fca.gov. Once you are in the Web site, select ‘‘Public Commenters,’’ then ‘‘Public Comments,’’ and follow the directions for ‘‘Reading Submitted Public Comments.’’ We will show your comments as submitted, but for technical reasons we may omit items such as logos and special characters. Identifying information that you provide, such as phone numbers and addresses, will be publicly available. However, we will attempt to remove email addresses to help reduce Internet

spam.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Joseph T. Connor, Associate Director for Policy and Analysis, Office of Secondary Market Oversight, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102–5090, (703) 883–4280, TTY (703) 883–4434;

Or Richard Katz, Senior Counsel, Office of

the General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102– 5090, (703) 883–4020, TTY (703) 883–

4020.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On November 18, 2011, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking to revise Farmer Mac’s non-program investment and liquidity requirements. 1 The 60-day comment period ended on January 17, 2012. The proposed rulemaking covered several topics. The FCA decided to finalize several of the proposed regulations separately in different phases of this rulemaking. 2 This phase of the rulemaking focuses on Farmer Mac’s liquidity by addressing four definitions in § 652.5, 3 liquidity management in § 652.35, and the liquidity reserve and the supplemental liquidity buffer in § 652.40.

We received a letter dated April 17,
2013 from Farmer Mac that asked us to reopen the comment period for 30 days on proposed § 652.40. Farmer Mac
informed us that after the final investment management rule became effective, it ‘‘commenced an evaluation and rebalancing of its investment portfolio in the context of the proposed liquidity requirements’’ set forth in proposed § 652.40. Farmer Mac believes that this evaluation process exposed possible concerns regarding the liquidity requirements in the proposed regulation, which in its opinion, may merit further consideration by the FCA
before a final rule is enacted.

In response to this request, we are reopening the comment period for all of the above-referenced liquidity regulations for an additional 30 days.
Based on the circumstances that Farmer Mac identified in its April 17, 2013 letter, reopening the comment period ensures the transparency and fairness of the rulemaking process in accordance with the requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act. In addition, because the proposed rule
would increase Farmer Mac’s minimum liquidity reserve requirement from 60 days to 90 days, FCA believes it is important to receive thorough comment on the impact of the proposal. The FCA invites all interested parties to provide additional comments about proposed §§ 652.35 and 652.40, and the four liquidity-related definitions in proposed § 652.5.

Dated: May 1, 2013.
Dale L. Aultman, Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. 2013–10821 Filed 5–7–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6705–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2013–0399; Directorate Identifier 2011–SW–064–AD]** 

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model EC 155B, EC155B1, SA–365N, SA– 365N1, AS–365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA– 366G1 helicopters. This proposed AD would require inspecting the collective pitch lever for correct locking and unlocking conditions. This proposed AD is prompted by two separate reports of inadvertent collective pitch lever locking and unlocking. The proposed
actions are intended to detect an incorrectly adjusted collective pitch lever, which could result in loss of control of the helicopter.

**DATES :**  We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 8, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may send comments by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.

• Fax: 202–493–2251.

• Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the **ADDRESSES** section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.


### 26713 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules

For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232– 0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at http:// www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Matt Wilbanks, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222–5110; email matt.wilbanks@faa.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Comments Invited

We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should submit only one time.

We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for comments.
We will consider comments filed after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change this proposal in light of the comments we
receive.

Discussion

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2011– 0154, dated August 22, 2011, to correct an unsafe condition for Eurocopter Model EC 155B, EC155B1, SA–365N, SA–365N1, AS–365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA–366G1 helicopters. EASA advises that two occurrences have been reported of inadvertent locking and unlocking of the collective pitch lever. One inadvertent collective pitch lever locking occurred when moving the collective pitch lever to the low-pitch position, and one inadvertent collective pitch lever unlocking occurred during engine start. To address this unsafe condition, Eurocopter issued AS 365 Alert Telex No. 67.00.10, SA 366 Alert Telex No. 67.05, and EC 155 Alert Telex No. 67A007, which describe procedures to inspect the collective pitch lever for correct locking and unlocking conditions. This inspection was mandated by Direction Ge  ́ ne

 ́rale de l’Aviation Civile (DGAC) France AD No. F–2005–127, dated July 20, 2005. DGAC subsequently revised its AD, No. F– 2005–127 R1, dated February 1, 2006 (DGAC AD F–2005–127 R1), after Eurocopter issued Alert Service Bulletins containing the same inspection procedures and bearing the same numbers as the Alert Telexes. Since the issuance of DGAC AD F– 2005–127 R1 Eurocopter developed an assembly comprised of a blade, a hinge, and a return spring to replace the flexible collective lever locking blade as terminating action for the inspection required by the AD. EASA then issued AD No. 2011–0154, dated August 22, 2011 (EASA AD 2011–0154), which superseded DGAC AD F–2005–127 R1, retaining the inspection procedures for the collective pitch lever and removing from the applicability helicopters with the hinged, spring-loaded collective lever locking blade installed, designated as modification (MOD) 0767B65.

FAA’s Determination

These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of France and are approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in its AD. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Related Service Information

We reviewed Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 67.00.10 for Model AS365 helicopters, ASB No. 67.05 for Model SA366 helicopters, and ASB No. 67A007 for Model EC155 helicopters.
All three ASBs are Revision 1 and are dated February 25, 2009. These ASBs describe procedures for inspecting and adjusting the collective pitch lever for correct locking and unlocking
conditions.

Eurocopter has also issued ASB No. 67.00.12, Revision 0, dated February 25, 2009, for Model AS365 helicopters; ASB No. 67.07, Revision 0, dated February 25, 2009, for Model AS366 helicopters; and ASB No. 67–009, Revision 1, dated July 19, 2010, for Model EC 155 helicopters. These ASBs contain the procedures for MOD 0767B65.

Proposed AD Requirements

This proposed AD would require:

• Inspecting the collective pitch lever for correct unlocking with a spring
scale.

• If the collective pitch lever unlocks outside of the correct ‘‘G’’ load, adjusting the collective pitch lever restraining tab and, for certain models, adjusting the collective link rods.

• Inspecting the collective pitch lever for the risk of inadvertent locking by measuring the clearance between the locking pin of the collective pitch lever and the L-section of the restraining tab.

• If the clearance between the locking pin of the collective pitch lever and the L-section of the restraining tab is incorrect, modifying the tab with a slight bend to the tab.

Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 32 helicopters of U.S. Registry.

We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to comply with this AD. Inspecting and adjusting the collective pitch lever would require about 1 work hour at an average labor rate of $85 per hour, for a total cost per helicopter of $85 and a cost to U.S. operators of $2,720.

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking
action.

Regulatory Findings

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications


### 26714 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules

under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and

4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by Reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:

**PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS**
**DIRECTIVES**

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

**§ 39.13 [Amended]**

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

Eurocopter France: Docket No. FAA–2013– 0399; Directorate Identifier 2011–SW–

064–AD.

(a) Applicability

This AD applies to Model EC 155B, EC155B1, SA–365N, SA–365N1, AS–365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA–366G1 helicopters, except helicopters with modification (MOD) 0767B5 installed, certificated in any category.

(b) Unsafe Condition

This AD defines the unsafe condition as inadvertent locking and unlocking of the collective pitch lever, which could result in subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

(c) Reserved

(d) Compliance

You are responsible for performing each action required by this AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

Within 50 hours time-in-service: (1) For Model EC155B and EC155B1 helicopters:

(i) Lock the collective pitch lever, and using a spring scale, measure the load (G) required to unlock the pilot’s collective pitch lever as depicted in Figure 1, Detail B of Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 67A007, Revision 1, dated February 25, 2009 (ASB 67A007).

(ii) If the collective pitch lever unlocks at a load less than 11 deca Newtons (daN) (24.7 lbs) or greater than 14 daN (31.5 lbs), before further flight, adjust the collective pitch lever restraining tab (F) using the oblong holes.

(iii) Set the collective pitch lever to the ‘‘low pitch’’ position and hold it in this position, without forcing it downwards.

(iv) Measure the clearance (J1) between the locking pin of the collective pitch lever (C) and the L-section of the restraining tab (F) as depicted in Figure 1, Detail A of ASB

67A007.

(v) If the clearance between the locking pin of the collective pitch lever and the L-section of the restraining tab is less than 3 millimeters (mm), before further flight, remove the restraining tab, clamp the restraining tab (F) in a vice with soft jaws, and gradually apply a load (H) to ensure a clearance of 3 mm or more, as depicted in Figure 1, Detail K of ASB 67A007.

(2) For Model SA–365N, SA–365N1, AS– 365N2, and AS 365 N3 helicopters:

(i) Completely loosen the friction, lock the collective pitch lever, and using a spring scale, measure the load (G) required to unlock the pilot’s collective pitch lever as depicted in Figure 1, Detail B of Eurocopter ASB No. 67.00.10, Revision 1, dated February 25, 2009 (ASB 67.00.10).

(ii) If the collective pitch lever unlocks at a load less than 5 daN (11.3 lbs) or greater than 14 daN (31.5 lbs), before further flight, adjust the collective pitch lever restraining tab (F) using the oblong holes and adjust the
collective link rods as described in the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.4., of ASB 67.00.10.

(iii) Set the collective pitch lever to the ‘‘low pitch’’ position and hold it in this position, without forcing it downwards.

(iv) Tighten the friction lock and measure the clearance (J1) between the locking pin ofthe collective pitch lever (C) and the Lsection of the restraining tab (F) as depicted in Figure 1, Detail A of ASB 67.00.10.

(v) If the clearance between the locking pin of the collective pitch lever and the L-section of the restraining tab is less than 3 mm, before further flight, remove the restraining tab, clamp the restraining tab (F) in a vice with soft jaws, and gradually apply a load (H) to ensure a clearance of 3 mm or more, as depicted in Figure 1, Detail K, of ASB

67.00.10.

(3) For Model SA–366G1 helicopters: (i) Completely loosen the friction, lock the collective pitch lever, and using a spring scale, measure the load (G) required to unlock the pilot’s collective pitch lever as depicted in Figure 1, Detail B of Eurocopter ASB No. 67.05, Revision 1, dated February 25, 2009 (ASB 67.05).

(ii) If the collective pitch lever unlocks at a load less than 5 daN (11.3 lbs) or greater than 14 daN (31.5 lbs), before further flight, adjust the collective pitch lever restraining tab (F) using the oblong holes and adjust the

collective link rods as described in the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.4., of ASB 67.05.

(iii) Set the collective pitch lever to the ‘‘low pitch’’ position and hold it in this position, without forcing it downwards.

(iv) Tighten the friction lock and measure the clearance (J1) between the locking pin ofthe collective pitch lever (C) and the Lsection of the restraining tab (F) as depicted in Figure 1, Detail A, of ASB 67.05.

(v) If the clearance between the locking pin of the collective pitch lever and the L-section of the restraining tab is less than 3 mm, before further flight, remove the restraining tab, clamp the restraining tab (F) in a vice with soft jaws, and gradually apply a load (H) to ensure a clearance of 3 mm or more, as depicted in Figure 1, Detail K, of ASB 67.05.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Wilbanks, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222–5110; email matt.wilbanks@faa.gov.

(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office or certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(g) Additional Information

(1) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety Agency AD No. 2011–0154, dated August 22, 2011.

(h) Subject

Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)

Code: 6710: Main Rotor Control.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 26,

2013.
Kim Smith, Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2013–10909 Filed 5–7–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**