alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of ACMAT Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry W. Nozko,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

                                                /s/ HENRY W. NOZKO, JR.
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                   Henry W. Nozko, Jr.
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

March 27, 2003

                                        70
#### E. A. WRIGHT *v. J.*D. FLANNER, Ex., &c.

Where an executor defendant at Spring Term 1867 had pleaded Fully-administered. and a reference had been had under such plea, and a report made charging him with assets : *Held,*that the Court had no power at a subsequent term, in May 1870, to allow the defendant to strike out such plea, and to plead anew.

Motion to amend pleading, heard by Thomas, *J.,*at May Special Court 1870, for Wayne.

This was an action begun on the 15th December 1866, to which the defendant, at March Term 1870 of Wayne Superior Court, pleaded, that he had fully administered, and had no *assets;*it was referred to a referee to inquire and report as to the truth of this report; the referee reported, and it .must be assumed, although it is not expressly stated, that his report showed assets in the hands of the defendant, applicable to the plaintiff’s claims. At a Special Term in May 1870, the defendant excepted to the report, and moved for leave to withdraw his former plea, and to plead anew, which the Judge allowed; and from that order the plaintiff appealed.

*Isler,*for the appellant.

Moore, *contra.*

Bodman, J.

(After stating the case as above.) Every plea must be true at the time it is pleaded: the difference therefore between the issues made by the plea “ fully administered ” pleaded at March Term 1867, and the same plea pleaded in May 1870, is sufficiently obvious. Under the latter the defendant would have the benefit of any payment of debts of equal dignity with the plaintiff’s, made by him since his first plea. We do not here say that there may *511not be circumstances which would justify a Court, under its general power of allowing amendments of pleading, to allow an amendment with such an effect; but the circumstances would be peculiar, to make such an amendment equitable. It is suggested in the present case, that the Judge supposed himself constrained to allow the amendment, by section 80 of chapter 113 of the acts of 1868-’69. What the effect of that section might be, were it applicable in this case, it is unnecessary to consider. The act of 1870, chapter 58, page 90, ratified February 16th 1870, declares that the act above referred to, was intended only to apply to cases in which letters of probate or administration were granted subsequently to July 1st 1868. There are some exceptions in this act, which it is not necessary to notice. This act could scarcely have been known to the Judge at the time of his decision. But it governs this case.

How far the defendant may avail himself of the act of 1866, allowing preference in certain cases, we are not called on to consider.

We think there is error in the order appealed from. Let this opinion be certified.

Peb Cubiam. Error.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


 /s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.
--------------------------
Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
December 15, 2003
Montana Association of Counties 

2715 SKYWAY DRIVE, SUITE A, HELENA, MT 59602 

April 5, 2013 

Docket Operations M-30 

West Building Ground Floor W 12-140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington DC 20590;3 

United States of America 

Department of Transportation 

Office of Secretary 

Washington DC 

RE. Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 

140nl444-4!!nO F<'~x I40nl 447-.'>nR 

1, ....... ,.; 

The Montana Association of Counties strongly encourages the continuation of Essential Air 

Service to the Montana communities of Lewistown and Miles City. In both communities, air 

service may become the only commercial means of accessing larger airline hubs with the 

recent shut down of Rimrock Stages bus service. While some of the routes that Rimrock 

operated are slowing being replaced by other ground carriers, that future is uncertain at 

best. 

The continuation of service to these communities is an essential part of the complete statewide connectivity in Montana and losing any of the links may well forshadow the loss of 

EAS statewide, which would be very damaging to our state's economy. 

Billings is a medical center where two large tertiary medical centers are located. These 

centers serve the advanced medical needs of central and eastern Montana. The air 

connectivity between Miles City and Lewistown may be a patient's best option to seek 

medical services. 

MACo 
Montana is a state of vast distances when compared with most other states. Losing 

Essential Air Service in Lewistown and Miles City is not a matter of passengers being 

inconvenienced by an additional drive of 25- SO miles. The distances between these 

communities and Billings are not all that different than from Washington DC to 

Philadelphia. 

Both communities are en-route stops to and from Havre or Glendive so the actual 

operational costs are low. Without the ridership of Lewistown, will the Havre- Billings 

route become unsustainable and without the ridership in Miles City will the Glendive -

Billings route become unsustainable? 

The graphic below shows the locations of these communities and the current Silver Airways 

routes. 

The Montana Association of Counties requests that you not enforce the Show Cause Order 

contained in Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 and to allow the Montana Essential Air Task 

Force and affected communities at least two years to develop plans to increase ridership. 

Sincerely, 

L Harold Blattie, Executive Director
#### Hart, Respondent, vs. Wisconsin Tax Commission, Appellant.

*November 12, 1931*

February *9, 1932.*

*64For the appellant there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *F. C. Seibold,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Seibold.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Stephens, Sletteland & Sutherland,*and oral argument by *Perry C. Sletteland*and *Eleanor Louise Jones,*all of, Madison.

Rosenberry, C. J.

The issues presented in this case are the same as those presented in *Whitbeck v. Wisconsin Tax Comm.,*decided herewith *(ante,*p. 58, 239 N. W. 655, 240 N. W. 804). The mandate in this case is the same as the mandate in that case for the reasons (here stated.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.
**EXHIBIT 99.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CyberGuard Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott J. Hammack, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

/s/ Scott J. Hammack 

 

Scott J. Hammack 

Chief Executive Officer 

May 27, 2003
Exhibit
4.2


 




	
  

  	
  NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT. INCORPORATED UNDER
  THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA. 2011 China Packaging
  GROUP INC. AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 190,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE: $0.001
  CUSIP NO. 16949R 10 0 THIS CERTIFIES THAT SPECIMEN IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF
  Shares of CHINA PACKAGING GROUP INC. Common
  Stock transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in
  person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate
  properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the
  Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of
  the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.
  Dated: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHAIRMAN CHINA PACKAGAGING GROUP INC.
  CORPORATE Seal NEVADA COUNTERSIGNED & REGISTERED COUNTERSIGNED
  Transfer Agent-Authorized Signature #19-C Copyright(c) 2006 / Reynolds
  Graphics, Inc. / Salt Lake City, Utah [ILLEGIBLE]

  






 


 












	
  

  	
  The following
  abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
  shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
  applicable laws or regulations. TEN COM - as tenants in common TEN ENT - as
  tenants by the entireties JTTEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship
  and not as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian (Cust) (Minor)
  under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also
  be used though not in the above list. For Value Received, hereby sell, assign
  and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER
  OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP
  CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within certificate,
  and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the
  said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
  subsititution in the premises. Dated 
  NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
  AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT
  ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER • NOTICE SIGNATURE
  GUARANTEED: SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A FIRM WHICH IS A MEMBER
  OF A REGISTERED NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE, OR BY A BANK (OTHER THAN A SAVINGS
  BANK). OR A TRUST COMPANY. THE GUARANTEEING FIRM MUST BE A MEMBER OF THE MEDALLION GUARANTEE PROGRAM.
  TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY *** FOR MEDALLION GUARANTEE USE ONLY *** SPECIMEN
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Jeffrey A. Whitnell, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Akorn, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 30, 2006 /s/ JEFFREY A. WHITNELL   Jeffrey A. Whitnell   Chief Financial Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 645

To amend the Clean Air Act to waive the oxygen content requirement for

reformulated gasoline that results in no greater emissions of air pollutants than reformulated gasoline meeting the oxygen content requirement.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 17, 1999

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to waive the oxygen content

requirement for reformulated gasoline that results in no

greater emissions of air pollutants than reformulated

gasoline meeting the oxygen content requirement.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF OXYGEN CONTENT REQUIREMENT

4 FOR CERTAIN REFORMULATED GASOLINE.

5 Section 211(k)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

6 7545(k)(2)(B)) is amended—

7 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘The oxy8 gen’’ and inserting the following:
2

•S 645 IS

1 ‘‘(i) REQUIREMENT.—The oxygen’’;

2 and

3 (2) in the second sentence—

4 (A) by striking ‘‘The Administrator’’ and

5 inserting the following:

6 ‘‘(ii) WAIVERS.—The Administrator’’;

7 (B) by striking ‘‘area upon a’’ and insert8 ing the following: ‘‘area—

9 ‘‘(I) upon a’’;

10 (C) by striking the period at the end and

11 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

12 (D) by adding at the end the following:

13 ‘‘(II) if the Administrator deter14 mines, by regulation, that reformu15 lated gasoline that contains less than

16 2.0 percent by weight oxygen and

17 meets all other requirements of this

18 subsection will result in total emis19 sions of ozone forming volatile organic

20 compounds and toxic air pollutants,

21 respectively, that are not greater than

22 the total emissions of those com23 pounds and pollutants resulting from

24 reformulated gasoline that contains at

25 least 2.0 percent by weight oxygen
3

•S 645 IS

1 and meets all other requirements of

2 this subsection.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>   1






                                   EXHIBIT 21

                        Subsidiaries of ACMAT Corporation



Listed are the subsidiaries of ACMAT Corporation:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 STATE OF
                  NAME                                    OWNERSHIP           INCORPORATION
                  ----                                    ---------           -------------
<S>                                                       <C>                 <C>
           ACMAT Companies, Inc.                              100%               Delaware


           AMINS, Inc.                                        100%              Connecticut


           Geremia Electric Co.                               100%              Connecticut


           ACSTAR Holdings, Inc.                              100%               Delaware

           ACSTAR Insurance Co. (1)                           100%                Illinois


           ACMAT of Texas, Inc.                               100%               Delaware


           United Coastal Insurance Company (2)                66%                Arizona
</TABLE>


(1) Owned 100% by ACSTAR Holdings, Inc.

(2)  Owned 66% by ACMAT Corporation and 34% by ACSTAR Insurance Company






                                       58
D1255 

Monday, October 27, 2008 

Daily Digest 

Senate 

Chamber Action 

Senate met at 9:00:03 a.m. in pro forma session, 

and recessed at 9:00:31 a.m. until 9:15 a.m., on 

Thursday, October 30, 2008. 

Committee Meetings 

(Committees not listed did not meet) 

h 

No committee meetings were held. 

House of Representatives 

Chamber Action 

The House was not in session today. The House 

is scheduled to meet at 11 a.m. on Saturday, January 

3, 2009, pursuant to the provisions of H. Con. Res. 

440. 

Committee Meetings 

BUILDING AN ECONOMIC RECOVERY 

PACKAGE 

Committee on Education and Labor: On October 24, the 

Committee held a hearing on Building an Economic 

Recovery Package: Creating and Preserving Jobs in 

America. Testimony was heard from Charles E.F. 

Millard, Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation; and public witnesses. 

GAMING THE TAX CODE: THE NEW 

YANKEE STADIUM 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: On October 24, the Subcommittee on Domestic Policy, 

hearing on Gaming the Tax Code: the New York 

Yankees and City of New York Response to Questions about the new Yankee Stadium. Testimony was 

heard from public witnesses. 

f 

COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR THURSDAY, 

OCTOBER 30, 2008 

(Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated) 

Senate 

No meetings/hearings are scheduled. 

House 

No committee meetings were held. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with DIGEST
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10699]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   TIME LIMITATION OF REFERRED BILLS

  Pursuant to clause 2 of rule XII the following actions were taken by 
the Speaker:

       H.R. 554. Referral to the Committees on Agriculture and the 
     Judiciary extended for a period ending not later than October 
     3, 2008.
       H.R. 948. Referral to the Committee on Ways and Means 
     extended for a period ending not later than October 3, 2008.
       H.R. 1717. Referral to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
     extended for a period ending not later than October 3, 2008.
       H.R. 1746. Referral to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, 
     Oversight and Government Reform, and the Judiciary for a 
     period ending not later than October 3, 2008.
       H.R. 5577. Referral to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
     extended for a period ending not later than October 3, 2008.
       H.R. 6357. Referral to the Committee on Ways and Means 
     extended for a period ending not later than October 3, 2008.
       H.R. 6598. Referral to the Committee on Agriculture 
     extended for a period ending not later than October 3, 2008.

                          ____________________
```
ex10-2.htm







Stoecklein Law Group, a Professional Corporation




Practice Limited to Federal Securities













	
Emerald Plaza

	
Telephone:  (619) 704-1310


	
402 West Broadway

	
Facsimile:  (619) 704-1325


	
Suite 690

	
email:  djs@slgseclaw.com


	
San Diego, California  92101

	
web:  www.slgseclaw.com


	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	  	  















Drew Hall


President


Bassline Productions, Inc.


860 Sacramento Ave.


Sacramento, CA 95605












RE:  Offering on a Best Efforts All or None Basis-Waiver of Rights as a Creditor







Dear Mr. Hall:







We understand that you are filing a Form S-1 Registration and plan on raising money on a best efforts, all or none basis.  The money raised from this offering will be put into an account that will not bar attachment from creditors.  We know we may be one of those creditors and we agree to waive any rights and claims we have to funds in that account, other than any amount you pay us voluntarily pursuant to our agreement.












Sincerely,

















/s/ Donald J. Stoecklein


Donald J. Stoecklein