alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Promissory Notes



 Exhibit 10.24 

Promissory Note 
 FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, Column A, a Chinese citizen (the “Borrower”), hereby unconditionally promises to pay to the order of Mai Wang Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., a Chinese wholly foreign owned company, or its assignee(s)
(collectively, the “Lender”), the principal sum of Column B, as the principal amount under the loan (“Loan”). 

1. Maturity: The Loan shall become due and payable until the earlier of (i) the date on which the Lender, at its sole and absolute discretion,
delivers the Exercise Notice to the Borrower pursuant to the Exclusive Purchase Option Agreement, whereby the Borrower shall transfer the Interests to the Lender or to the Lender’s designated natural or legal Persons; and (ii) the date on
which ML Shopping is dissolved, liquidated, becomes bankruptcy or otherwise terminated in accordance with the Articles of Association of ML Shopping and relevant PRC laws and regulations from the date of the execution of this note. The Loan may be
renewed pursuant to the Loan Agreement executed between the Lender and the Borrower as of Column C (the “Loan Agreement”). 

2. Default and Remedy: Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default specified in the Loan Agreement, the Loan shall automatically become immediately due
and payable together with all Default Interest (as defined in the Loan Agreement) accrued and all other obligations payable under the Loan Agreement without any notice. 

 

			
	By:	 	     /s/ Column A

		
	Name:	 	Column A
		
	Date:	 	  


  


 1 









								
	 	  	 Column A
	  	Column B	  	 Column C

	1	  	 XU YI
	  	RMB	1,500,000	  	Feb 
20th, 2010
	2	  	 ZHANG BANG
	  	RMB	3,000,000	  	Feb
20th, 2010
	3	  	 LIU GUISHENG
	  	RMB	500,000	  	Sep 17, 2010

  

 2
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Scott E. Willkomm, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott E. Willkomm
---------------------

Scott E. Willkomm
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2006

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish
Re Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.02



I, Michael D. Matte, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for CyberGuard Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|Date: February 12, 2004                 
|                                        
|/S/    MICHAEL D. MATTE                 
|                                        
|Michael D. Matte Chief Financial Officer
Order entered July 30 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00791
- CV BILL MCINTYRE, Appellant

V. ELY EDWARDS AND WILL IE RUTH EDWARDS, Appellee s On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 03032



### O RDER By letter dated June 30, 2015, the Court directed appellant to pay the filing fee for the appeal within ten days. By letter dated July 10, 2015, we notified appellant that the Dallas County District Clerk inform ed the Court that appellant has not paid for the clerk’s record. Appellant has not respond ed to either letter, but we note that the reporter’s record was filed on July 10, 2015. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to pay, within TEN DAYS of the date of this o rder, the $195 filing fee for the appeal.
We further ORDER appellant to provide this Court, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, with written verification that he has paid or made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record.We warn appellant that if the filing fee is not paid and we do not receive written

verification regarding payment for the clerk’s record, we will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal . See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to appellant Bill McIntyre and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
#### David Simons, Appellant, v Lee Ross, Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 873]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about February 13, 2003, which denied plaintiffs motion to reargue a prior order, same court and Justice, entered on or about April *2,*2002, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

No appeal lies from an order denying reargument *(Deshler v East W. Renovators,*259 AD2d 351 [1999]). We note that the underlying April 2, 2002 order, which directed entry of judgment, was affirmed by this Court in October 2003 (309 AD2d 667 [2003]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.
U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Re: Company Name Change Dear Sir or Madam: Midstream Integrity Services, LLC (henceforth referred to as “MIS”) hereby petitions the Secretary of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") to change the company name on the petition granted to MIS (Exemption No. 11554, FAA Docket No. FAA - 2015 - 0377) as well as the COA granted to MIS ( FAA - 2015 - 0377 - 333E ) to “ USDataWing Aerial Analytics , LLC.” **Company name change** MIS is changing its company name to USDataWing Aerial Analytics, LLC . We request that all authorizations previously granted to MIS be transferred to USDataWing Aerial Analytics, LLC via a memorandum for record or reissuance of the aforementioned exemption documents, whichever the Secretary determines to be appropriate. Respectfully submitted,

Landon Phillips Program Manager, Unmanned Aerial Systems Midstream Integrity Services / USDataWing Aerial Analytics, LLC
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 167 (Monday, October 20, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10519]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 Senate

Monday, October 20, 2008

(Legislative day of Wednesday, September 17, 2008)

  The Senate met at 3 and 5 seconds p.m., on the expiration of the 
recess, and was called to order by the Honorable Bernard Sanders, a 
Senator from the State of Vermont.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 88755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troutdale Grid, LLC....................  EG24-249-000
Ponderosa Wind II, LLC.................  EG24-250-000
Oliver Wind IV, LLC....................  EG24-251-000
Steele Flats Wind I, LLC...............  EG24-252-000
Minco II Energy Storage, LLC...........  EG24-253-000
Breckinridge Energy Storage, LLC.......  EG24-254-000
Harquahala Sun 1, LLC..................  EG24-255-000
Harquahala Sun 2, LLC..................  EG24-256-000
HV Sun SFA Manager 1, LLC..............  EG24-257-000
MS Solar 7, LLC........................  EG24-258-000
Holyoke BESS, LLC......................  EG24-259-000
PNY BESS, LLC..........................  EG24-260-000
Wellesley BESS, LLC....................  EG24-261-000
Unbridled Solar, LLC...................  EG24-262-000
Mordor ES1 LLC.........................  EG24-263-000
Mordor ES2 LLC.........................  EG24-264-000
Clearview Solar I, LLC.................  EG24-265-000
BPL Crown Solar LLC....................  EG24-266-000
BPL Files Solar LLC....................  EG24-267-000
BPL Sol Solar LLC......................  EG24-268-000
Elisabeth Solar, LLC...................  EG24-270-000
Sierra Pinta Energy Storage, LLC.......  EG24-271-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of October 2024, the status of 
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became 
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) 
(2024).

    Dated: November 4, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-26001 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Chicago Lumber Company, Appellee, v. H. C. Davis *et al.,*Appellants.

Appeal: record : transcript filed, after six months .

*Appeal from Polk District Court.*— Hon. W. F. Conrad, Judge.

Wednesday, February 4, 1891.

Action in equity to establish a mechanic’s lien. There was a decree for plaintiff, and the defendants *appeal.*

Affirmed.

*Ira W. Antlerson,*for appellants.

*WishcCrd & Bailey,*for appellee.

Granger, J.

I.—The short-hand notes of the evidence taken on the trial were not extended and the transcript filed within six months, as provided by Code, section 2742, and the holdings of this court in *Arts v. Culbertson,*73 Iowa, 13, and *Kavaleir v. Machula,*77 Iowa, 121. For this reason appellee moves to strike the evidence from the record, and the motion must be sustained.

*732II. Appellants filed a motion to strike the additional abstract from the files because not filed within the time provided by the rules of this cou’»t. No prejudice appears from the neglect to file within the time, and under the rule announced in *Green v.*Ronen, 62 Iowa, SO, the motion must be refused. Affirmed.
Kejbarok im Ejmour Ilo Jikin Jerbal

EJ KAKIEN!

Aoleb ri-jerbal ewõr air jimwe ñan: 

 Juon jikin jerbal eo ejjelok men in jorren ie. 

 Bõk lõñtak wewein ko rej jumae ejmour ñan 

jikin jerbal eo ak OSHA, ak repoot e jorren ko rej 

walok ilo jikin jerbal ilo ejjelok uwata. 

 Bõk aolep melele im katakin ko ikijen men ko re 

kauatata ko ilo jikin jerbal, ekoba kein jerbal ko 

ewor baijin ie ilo jikin jerbal eo am. 

 Kajitok bwe OSHA en kommane juon etale 

eo ettino ilo jikin jerbal eo am elane kwoj kile 

ke elon wewein men in kakkure ak wewein 

ko rejjab eman ñan ejmour eo am. Ewõr am 

maroñ in kelet juon eo emaroñ in konono iben 

OSHA ilo etam.

 Bõk kwonaam (ak kotlok bwe eo kwar kelete 

en bõk kwonaan) ilo etale ko an OSHA im 

kwalok ilo makelok iam iben rein rej etale. 

 Ewõr 30 raan ñan am kwalok am abnõnõ (ilo 

telephone, online, ak email) elañe ewõr men 

nae eok kin am kar kwalok jimwe ko am. 

 Lale aolep jorren ko OSHA ear lewaj nae jikin 

jerbal eo am. 

 Kajitok kaape in rekoot in ejmour ko,teej ko 

rej kwalok joñan kauatata ilo jikin jerbal eo, im 

nañinmij im jorren ko rej walok ilo jikin jerbal.

Jikin jerbal eo ej aikuij: 

 Lelok ñan ri-jerbal ro jikin jerbal eo ejelok 

kauatata ie. E jumae kakien ñe ej wõr kaje ñan 

ri-jerbal eo ej kõjerbal jimwe eo an iumwin 

kien, ekoba ñe ej bõk lõñtak wewein ko rej 

jumae ejmour im kauatata ñan jikin jerbal eo ak 

OSHA, ak ripoot e jorren ko ak nañinmej ko ilo 

jikin jerbal.

 Loor i wõt kakien ko an OSHA ilo jikin jerbal.

 Kõjelaik OSHA iumwin 8 awa elikin jorren ko 

rej walok ilo jikin jerbal ak iumwin 24 awa elikin 

jorren ko rej aikuij etal ñan hospital, jorren ko 

ewõr jako in mõttan enbwin ie, ak ñe ej jako 

juon mejen armij. 

 Kõmmani ekkatak ko ñan ri-jerbal ro ilo juon 

kajin eo im renaj melele kake.

 Kwalok kin pija kein ilo jikin jerbal eo am. 

 Kwalok kin jorren ko nae jikin jerbal eo jen 

OSHA ilo ijo ak iturin ijo jorren ko raar walok ie.

Ewõr jiban nan jikin jerbal ko redrik im rellap, 

ilo ejjelok kaje, iumwin program ko an 

OSHA ilo aolep state.

Kepaak OSHA. Kem maroñ jiban.

1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • TTY 1-877-889-5627 • www.osha.gov

Ejelok wõneen Pija kein jen OSHA.

Kejbarok ilo Jikin 

jerbal im ijo ej 

Eddoik Ejmour

OSHA 4183-06 2022It’s the Law – Marshallese
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2277]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         DANIEL W. BLANKENBURG

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. JOHN T. DOOLITTLE

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. DOOLITTLE. Madam Speaker, Daniel W. Blankenburg first came to 
Washington in 1994. He began working in Congress for Rep. Don Manzullo 
and then Rep. Tom Ewing. He then served as Legislative Director to Rep. 
John Shimkus until he moved to the private sector to work for the 
National Federation of Independent Businesses. In 2005, Dan decided to 
return to public service, and I was fortunate enough to have him join 
our office. At that time, we were looking for a person to build 
coalitions and form alliances, and Dan's impressive record made him the 
perfect candidate.
  In his role as Chief of Staff, Dan has made each decision with 
careful attention to ensure the best possible outcome. His meticulous 
approach, vast knowledge and inquisitive nature have been tremendous 
assets to me personally as well as to our entire organization. I am 
always confident that Dan leaves no stone unturned when making 
decisions on my behalf.
  Dan's highly regarded character is demonstrated by his popularity 
around the capitol. It is difficult to walk down a hallway, enter an 
elevator or sit at a local restaurant with Dan without striking up a 
conversation with one of his many friends and acquaintances. While most 
of us simply wave or exchange salutations in passing, Dan takes the 
time to catch up with friends whenever possible. There is even a chance 
for encounters with complete strangers if they happen to be wearing a 
Bears or Cubs hat.
  While Dan's professionalism is truly impressive, his personal 
qualities are also admirable. Dan often speaks fondly about his family: 
he enjoys visiting his parents, Millie and Dan, along with his 
grandmother, Mildred, in Colorado. Dan speaks with great pride about 
his brothers, Jason and Chip, and his sister, Jodie. He enjoys being an 
uncle to his nephew, Parken, and his nieces, Jodie and Mattes. Perhaps 
most notably, Dan relishes every opportunity he can find to talk about 
his lovely wife Cate, whom he truly adores.
  Dan is a man of great talents, and I know he will do well in whatever 
future opportunities he pursues. I wish him all the best wherever life 
may take him.

                          ____________________
```
#### Whyte (Harriet) by guardian *ad litem,*Respondent, vs. Lindblom and another, Appellants.

*May 9*

September *11, 1934.*

For the appellants there were briefs by *Hammond & Jones*of Kenosha, and oral argument by *Walter W. Hammond.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Randall, Cavanagh, Stephenson & Mittelstaed*of Kenosha, and oral argument by *Roy S. Stephenson.*

The following opinion was filed June 5, 1934:

Fairchild, J.

The facts in this case are set forth in the companion case of *Jessel S. Whyte v. Lindblom, ante,*p. 21, 255 N. W. 265, 256 N. W. 244. The driver of the car failed to make proper observations before entering an intersection, and is guilty of a failure to maintain a proper lookout. The rule in the companion case controls this case. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and a new trial granted.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to grant a new trial.

The following memorandum was filed September 11, 1934:

Per Curiam

*(on motion for rehearing).*Motion for rehearing denied. We hold that the negligence of the plaintiff *28is so related to the collision involved in the case as to be a cause therefor. The mandate heretofore entered is amended so as to provide that the new trial shall be confined to the comparison of the negligence of the plaintiff and defendant and an assessment of damages in accordance therewith. Neither party to have costs on motion for rehearing.

A motion to clarify the mandate was denied, without costs, on October 9, 1934.
LVENANGO AREA 

CHAMBERO F COA4MERC E '*^ ^^'^ ^*''^^*' ^•^' ^""^ ^^^ 

p r ^ Oil City, Pennsylvania 16301 

J^^ ' ":'PiCrj"^;;:7Cni^T!0N Phone: 814-676-8521 

5 P ^ Fax: 814-676-8185 

^Bf a 

July 9, 2010 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

The Venango Area Chamber of Commerce supports 'Option 1' of Gulfstream 

Internationars proposal to continue offering essential air service to the Oil City/Franklin 

community. This option will enable the community to work toward economic recovery by 

providing air access to the nation's air transportation system. 

The current EAS agreement and the air service provided have been hampered by several 

economic and performance factors resulting in the cost per passenger exceeding the $200 cap. 

Some of these factors include: 

• The contract in 2008 was bid based upon oil costs at $140^bl resulting in $4.50 per gallon 

Jet Fuel. The actual price was half that by the time the service began in September 2008. 

• We quickly entered one of the worst recessions in 50 years. 

• Passengers were fearful of national and international health scares such as the SARs and 

swine flu. 

• The Oil Region had a terrible winter of 2009-2010 that saw the air carrier cancel 21 % of its 

Franklin flights in December, January and February, primarily due to airborne icing. 

Many of our local businesses are just beginning to recover from the recent recession, and 

are hoping to increase their air travel this year. 

The Venango Chamber recently invited community and business leaders to discuss this issue. 

We will work collaboratively with the Venango Regional Airport, elected officials, and our lead 

economic development agency to encourage local businesses to commit a percentage of their 

air travel to being provided by the connection from the Venango Regional Airport. 

Additionally we will work with Mickey Bowman of Gulfstream International on a Save Our 

Service (SOS) campaign to recruit air travelers and encourage our almost 600 business 

members to use the air service. We will collaborate our campaign efforts with other local 

business and community groups to increase passenger intake to reduce our cost per passenger. 

Our chamber represents the entire Venango County community, and our board of 

directors is making a formal commitment to advocate on behalf of the community's air 

service. 

On behalf of the Venango Area Chamber of Commerce, 

Susan Williams Pam Niederriter 

Executive Director President, Board of Directors 

NOTE: A signed hard copy has been mailed to you at the DOT.
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Canterbury Park
Holding Corporation (the Company) herby certify that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                          
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period March
 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents,
 in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
 of the Company.                      

|                    |                                        | 
|------------------- | -------------------------------------- | 
|                    | CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING CORPORATION   
|                    |                                       
|Dated: May 16, 2011 | /s/ Randall D. Sampson                 | 
|                    | Randall D. Sampson,                   
|                    | President, and Chief Executive Officer

|                    |                                              | 
|------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | 
|Dated: May 16, 2011 | /s/ David C. Hansen                          | 
|                    | David C. Hansen,                            
|                    | Vice
 President, and Chief Financial Officer

24

---