alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 448 

Recognizing the roles and contributions of the teachers of the United States 

in building and enhancing the civic, cultural, and economic well-being 

of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2016 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. KIRK, Mr. COTTON, Mr. BLUNT, 

Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. MORAN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. DAINES, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. 

COONS, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. 

CARPER, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. WARREN, Mr. DONNELLY, 

Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. 

HATCH) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the roles and contributions of the teachers of 

the United States in building and enhancing the civic, 

cultural, and economic well-being of the United States. 

Whereas education and knowledge form the foundation of the 

current and future strength of the United States; 

Whereas teachers and other education staff have earned and 

deserve the respect of their students and communities for 

the selfless dedication of the teachers and staff to community service and the futures of the children of the 

United States; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 448 ATS 

Whereas the purposes of National Teacher Appreciation 

Week, held from May 2, 2016, through May 6, 2016, are 

to raise public awareness of the unquantifiable contributions of teachers and to promote greater respect and understanding for the teaching profession; and 

Whereas students, schools, communities, and a number of organizations representing educators are hosting teacher 

appreciation events in recognition of National Teacher 

Appreciation Week: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) thanks the teachers of the United States; 

3 and 

4 (2) promotes the profession of teaching by en5 couraging students, parents, school administrators, 

6 and public officials to participate in teacher appre7 ciation events during National Teacher Appreciation 

8 Week. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          35,437
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,069
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                44,838
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 2,590
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    115,963
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          61,455
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            61,900
<LOANS>                                        630,139
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 938,792
<DEPOSITS>                                     711,405
<SHORT-TERM>                                   125,634
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             15,088
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,480
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,574
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 938,792
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 42,181
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,859
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,875
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                51,915
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,463
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,089
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           26,826
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      107
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   7
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 26,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,167
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,167
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,193
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.33
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,734
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   484
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,322
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      827
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,097
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,699
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,699
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          9,699
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. ELI O’KELLY.

*Appeal in State Cases.*

1. Appeals in criminal as well as in civil cases must be taken to the next ensuing term of this court.

2. Where the judge who tries a criminal action goes out of office before making up the case on appeal, a new trial will be awarded, provided the defendant himself is guilty of no laches.

*(Isler v. Haddock, 72 N.*C., 119; *State v. Fox,*81 N. C., 576, cited and approved).

INDICTMENT for bigamy tried at June Term, 1882, of Wake Superior Court, before *Bennett, J.*

After verdict of guilty and before the judgment was pronounced, the judge resigned and the office became vacant. James C. MaoRae being appointed his successor, qualified, and presided at the same term, and upon motion of the solicitor, proceeded to judgment against the defendant, from which he appealed.

*Attorney-General,*for the State.

No counsel for defendant.

Ruffin, J.

As the judge who presided at the trial, and before whom the exceptions were taken had gone out of office, *610no statement of the case on appeal was ever prepared, or filed with the clerk below, nor was any ever sent to this court-. The transcript of the record was filed with the clerk here on the 29th day of January, 1883.

When the cause was called the Attorney-General moved to dismiss the defendant’s appeal upon the ground of his laches, in that, he failed to docket the transcript at the October term last of this court.

The retirement from office of the judge who presided at the trial, put it out of the defendant’s power to have his exceptions stated, and he would, therefor, without doubt, have been entitled to a new trial under the rule laid down in *Isler*v. *Haddock,*72 N. C., 119, and that class of cases, provided he had been diligent in docketing his appeal. But parties cannot be permitted to dally with the courts in any such manner. If they take appeals, they must press them with earnestness, and not in such wise as to leave the impression that they are seeking delay in the execution of the sentence, rather than a reversal of the judgment. The decision in *State*v. *Fox,*81 N. C., 576, was put partly on this ground, and it commends itself to the court, with whom the maxim is, *leges vigilantibus non dormientibus factce sunt.*

We have more than once said that an appeal meant an appeal to the *next term,*and if neglected to be so taken, the party would have no favors extended to him. Acting upon this principle, we feel constrained to yield to the motion of the Attorney General.

The judgment of the court below is, therefore, affirmed, and this will be certified, to the end that the cause may be proceeded in according to law.

No error. Affirmed.
#### D. D. SUTTLE v. J. M. GREEN.

*Practice*— Appeal *from Justice’s Court.*

*"Where*.the defendant upon judgment being rendered against him in a Justice’s Court appealed in open Court, and afterwards told the Justice not to send up the papers, who thereupon delayed so doing, and ■thereafter the plaintiff changed his mind and filed with the Clerk of ■the Superior Court a bond sufficient to cover the plaintiff’s claim and costs; *Held,*that it was not error in the Court below to refuse to ■dismiss the appeal.

Motion to dismiss an Appeal heard at Eall Term, 1877, -®f CleavelaNd Superior Court, before *Kerr, J.*

The .statement embodied in the opinion of this Court delivered -by Mr. Justice Reade is sufficient to an understanding of the point decided. His Honor refused the motion to ■dismiss and the plaintiff appealed.

*Mr. A¥. J.*Montgomery, for plaintiff.

*Mr. J. F.*Hoke, for defendant.

Reade, J.

On the trial before the Justice, the defendant -denied that he owed the plaintiff any thing. And when the Justice gave judgment against him, he appealed in open Court. This was all that he was obliged to do. Jt than became the duty of the Justice, upon his fees being paid, to send the papers to the Clerk of the Court. As an •excuse for not sending up the papers, the Justice said that the defendant told him not to do it. Concede that this was .•a sufficient excuse for delay on the part of the Justice, still it did not estop the defendant. He had *locuspoenitentice,*and be did change his mind and filed with the Clerk a good bond to cover the plaintiff’s claim and cost. And even ■«when the defendant told the Justice that he need not send *77up the appeal, it was not upon the idea of abandoning his. defence; but as he said, upon theidea that he .could defeat the judgment by another way, the homestead; failing in. which, lie fell back upon his appeal.

We have already said that there was nothing in what the-defendant did or'said to estop him from prosecuting his appeal. And if there had been some slight'irregularity, such) as what he said to the Justice and his tardiness in not having the Justice to send up the papers before the term of the-Court, if indeed the 8th of October was after the commencement of the term; yet as it was manifest from his denying; the debt, appealing from the judgment and giving a good bond, that he never intended to abandon his defence, it was-very proper that His Honor should have refused to dismiss-the appeal. And even if the defendant had lost his appeal by any technical fault, His. Honor o might well have had it. brought up by *recordari.*

There is no error. This will be certified-

Per Curiam. • Judgment affirmed-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOUND ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          58,922
<SECURITIES>                                 2,749,164
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,693,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                 30,511,759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,894,961
<PP&E>                                       5,744,241
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,044,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,594,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,506,078
<BONDS>                                      2,235,736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,735
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,756,105
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,594,654
<SALES>                                     17,526,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,526,818
<CGS>                                       12,870,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,870,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,629,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             126,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,047,642
<INCOME-TAX>                                   710,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,337,642
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,337,642
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 431 

Recognizing the immeasurable benefits of the national 4-H program to the 

young people of the United States and supporting the campaign to 

expand the 4-H program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2016 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Ms. HEITKAMP, Mr. ALEXANDER, Ms. BALDWIN, 

Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BROWN, Mrs. CAPITO, 

Mr. CASEY, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. COONS, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

CRAPO, Mr. DAINES, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. ENZI, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. 

ISAKSON, Mr. KIRK, Mr. KING, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MORAN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. PETERS, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. 

TILLIS, Mr. UDALL, Mr. VITTER, Mr. MERKLEY, Mrs. ERNST, and Mr. 

INHOFE) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the immeasurable benefits of the national 4- 

H program to the young people of the United States 

and supporting the campaign to expand the 4-H program. 

Whereas in the late 1800s, 4-H clubs developed in rural communities to promote agricultural education among young 

people; 

Whereas the Smith-Lever Act (7 U.S.C. 341 et seq.) established the cooperative extension services, which resulted 

in a national 4-H program; 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 431 ATS 

Whereas the 4-H program and pledge are based on the values 

of community service, public leadership, and healthful living; 

Whereas 4-H has played an indispensable role in shaping the 

lives of young leaders in rural areas of the United States 

for over 100 years; 

Whereas nearly 6,000,000 young people are currently involved in 4-H, 40 percent of whom are from urban and 

suburban backgrounds; 

Whereas the 4-H program has evolved to include opportunities for 4-H youth to become proficient in— 

(1) science, technology, engineering, and math 

(STEM); and 

(2) citizenship and public speaking; 

Whereas young people who participate in 4-H are twice as 

likely as their peers who are not involved in 4-H— 

(1) to be civically engaged; 

(2) to participate in science, engineering, and computer technology programs outside of school; and 

(3) to make healthful life choices; 

Whereas the National 4-H Congress, National 4-H Conference, and Citizenship Washington Focus give hundreds 

of young people who participate in 4-H the opportunity 

to exercise leadership skills nationally and to learn about 

the history and government of the United States; and 

Whereas in April 2016, the National 4-H Council launched 

a ‘‘Grow True Leaders’’ campaign to expand the benefits 

of 4-H to more communities, with the goal of creating 

10,000,000 True Leaders by 2025: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 431 ATS 

1 (1) recognizes 4-H as a vital organization for 

2 training the next generation for national leadership; 

3 (2) congratulates the National 4-H Council on 

4 its ‘‘Grow True Leaders’’ campaign; and 

5 (3) supports the efforts of the National 4-H 

6 Council to grow and diversify the 4-H program. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Kevin  Monson,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report of  Ecological  Services,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period
ended September 30, 2001 fully complies within the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained
in such Form 10-QSB  fairly  represents  in all material  respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Ecological Services, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ Kevin Monson
                                           ----------------------------
                                        Name: Kevin Monson
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer


I,  Kevin  Monson,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report of  Ecological  Services,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period
ended September 30, 2001 fully complies within the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained
in such Form 10-QSB  fairly  represents  in all material  respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Ecological Services, Inc.



                                          By: /s/ Kevin Monson
                                             --------------------------
                                          Name: Kevin Monson
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                     149,832
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            190158
<PP&E>                                     3056707
<DEPRECIATION>                             1764821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2231684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       368327
<BONDS>                                     737436
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     62386
<OTHER-SE>                                  865465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2231684
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            658485
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          46414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (192804)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (192804)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (192804)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.25)


</TABLE>
#### Wisconsin Chair Company and another, Respondents, vs. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and another, Appellants.

*February 25*

April *11, 1916.*

*Appeal: Affirmance on equal division.*

*&*judgment of the circuit court reversing an award made by the industrial commission is affirmed, this court being equally divided on the question whether there was sufficient evidence before the commission to give it jurisdiction.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for .Dane county: E. Ray Stevens, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by *Martin Borsenih*against the *Wisconsin Chair Company.*An award made by the *Industrial Commission*was reversed on appeal to the circuit court, and from the judgment of the circuit court the *Industrial Commission*and *Borsenih*bring this appeal.

Eor the appellant *Industrial Commission of Wisconsin*there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *J. B. Messerschmidt,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Messer schmidt.*

Eor the respondents there was a brief by *Olin, Butler, Stebbins & Stroud,*attorneys, and *Adams, Crews, Bobb & Wescott,*of counsel, and oral argument by *Byron II. Steb-bins.*

Rosenbebey, J.

The question presented by the appeal is whether or not there was sufficient evidence before the *Commission*to give it jurisdiction to act in the premises. Chief Justice Winslow and Justices Maeshall and Vinje are of the opinion that there was no such evidence and that therefore the judgment of the circuit court should be affirmed, while Justices SiebecKeb, Kebwin, and the writer are of the opin*26ion that there was such evidence and that therefore the judgment of the circuit court should be reversed and the award of the *Commission*affirmed. This court being equally divided, the judgment of the circuit court is thereby affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 10(a)26

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") made and entered into by and between The Southern Company ("Southern"), Southern Company Services, Inc. (the "Company") and Mr. William Paul Bowers ("Mr. Bowers") (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties") is effective December 31,****2008.  This Agreement amends and restates the Change in Control Agreement entered into by Mr. Bowers, Southern and Southern Company Services, effective January1, 2007. 

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, Mr. Bowers is Executive Vice President of the Company;

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to provide to Mr. Bowers certain severance benefits under certain circumstances following a change in control (as defined herein) of Southern or the Company;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and the agreements of the Parties set forth in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

 

1

 

 

----