alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ambrose, Appellant, vs. Reichenbach, Sheriff, Respondent.

*January 10*

February *4, 1930.*

*18
      *Douglas J. Mangan*of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by *George A. Bowman,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, *A. J. Beyer,*deputy district attorney, and *Louis S. Wiener,*assistant district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Beyer.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

The contention of counsel here is that because sec. 351.41, Stats., which defines the offense of taking improper liberties with the person of a minor, does not declare the offense to be a felony, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted under sec. 340.52 for an attempt to commit an offense.

The statutes involved are the following:

> “Section 340.52 *Attempt or advising.*Any person who shall advise the commission of or attempt to commit any felony as defined in section 353.31, that shall fail in being committed, the punishment for which such advice or attempt is not otherwise prescribed in these statutes, shall be imprisoned in the state prison not more than three years nor less than one year, or by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, nor less than one hundred dollars.

> “Section 351.41 *Improper liberties.*Any person who shall indecently assault and take improper liberties with the privates of any minor by the use of the hand, or who shall voluntarily permit the use of his own privates in such manner by any minor, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not less than thirty days nor more than six months, or by imprisonment in the state prison not exceeding two years.

> *19“Section 353.31 *Felony.*The term ‘felony,’ when used in any statute, shall be construed to mean an offense for which the offender, on conviction, shall be liable by law to be punished by imprisonment in a state prison.”

It is not necessary for us to consider the effect of sec. 353.31 in relation to any other matter than that presented by the record in this case. If we substitute in sec. 340.52 the provisions of sec. 353.31 which are imported into it, we have the following:

> “Any person who shall advise the commission of or attempt to commit an offense for which the offender, on conviction, shall be liable by law to be punished by imprisonment in a state prison, that shall fail in being committed, the punishment for which such advice or attempt is not otherwise prescribed in these statutes, shall be imprisoned,” etc. •

We are unable to perceive how a substantial argument ' can be made that this is not the meaning of sec. 340.52. The offense of taking improper liberties with the person of a minor is defined by sec. 351.41; being one for which the offender is liable to be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, the petitioner in this case was properly charged and the trial court was not in error in overruling the demurrer to the return.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 698 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.698

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
 To review the suitability and feasibility of recovering costs of high 
 altitude rescues at Denali National Park and Preserve in the State of 
                     Alaska, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That no later than nine 
months after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
(hereinafter referred to as the ``Secretary'') shall complete a report 
on the suitability and feasibility of recovering the costs of high 
altitude rescues on Mt. McKinley, within Denali National Park and 
Preserve. The Secretary shall also report on the suitability and 
feasibility of requiring climbers to provide proof of medical insurance 
prior to the issuance of a climbing permit by the National Park 
Service. The report shall also review the amount of fees charged for a 
climbing permit and make such recommendations for changing the fee 
structure as the Secretary deems appropriate. Upon completion, the 
report shall be submitted to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate, and the Committee on Resources of the House of 
Representatives.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
COFFEE PEOPLE, INC.
<TABLE>
                       CALCULATIONS OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<CAPTION>

                             Three Months                 Nine Months
                            Ended September 30,         Ended September 30,
                         ----------------------     -----------------------
                            1997        1996            1997        1996
                         ----------  ----------     -----------  ----------
<S>                      <C>          <C>            <C>         <C>    

Weighted average
  shares outstanding
  for the period          3,252,958   2,069,505       3,245,814   2,000,652

Dilutive common
  stock options using
  the treasury stock
  method                          -      65,424               -      65,601
                         ----------  ----------     -----------  ----------
Total shares used
   for per share
  calculations            3,252,958   2,134,929       3,245,814   2,066,253
                         ==========  ==========     ===========  ==========

Net income (loss)        $( 320,000) $   47,000     $(6,564,000) $  181,000
                         ==========  ==========     ===========  ==========
Earnings(loss)
   per share             $    (0.10) $     0.02     $     (2.02) $     0.09
                         ==========  ==========     ===========  ==========

</TABLE>
#### ARCHIBALD H. ARRINGTON *vs.*CALVIN A. SMITH.

In the ease of an appeal from the County to the Superior Court, where the cause has been continued for two years in the Superior Court and witnesses summoned on both sides, it is too late for the appellee to move to dismiss the appeal for the want of an appeal bond. He will ‘be considered as having waived his right to a bond.

Appeal from the Superior .Court of Law of Wake County, at Fall Term, 1843, his Honor Judge Bailex presiding.

This was an action on the case commenced in the County Court of Wake. . A judgment having been rendered in that Court against the plaintiff at May Term, 1841, he appealed to the Superior Court, but neglected to give an appeal bond. The cause was entered on the docket of the Superior Court of Wake County at the Fall Term, 1841, and continued-at the several terms of the Court until the Fall Term, 1843. When the cause was called for trial on the second day of that term, the plaintiff declared himself ready, but the defendant, hawing called his witnesses, stated he was not ready; whereupon the cause was left open until the next day. On the next day the defendant moved to dismiss the appeal for the want of an appeal bond. The plaintiff then moved for leave to file a bond lor costs and damages, which was refused. It appeared that a subpeena had been issued by the Clerk of the Superior Court for the defendant’s witnesses, returnable to the Fall Term, 1841. On the above facts, the Court dis *60missed the appeal and gave judgment against the plaintiff ^01’ costó °f ^ie Superior and County Courts.

From this judgment the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.

*/Saunders and Miller*for the plaintiff.

*W. II. Haywood*for the defendant.

Daniel, J.

At May sessions 1841 of the County Court of Wake, the plaintiff appealed. The Defendant, two years after the transcript of the record had been filed in the Superior Couit, moved to dismiss the appeal, because there was no appeal bond. The defendant, at any of the antecedent terms of the Superior Court, could have made the motion to dismiss) he did not do so, but went on and forced the plaintiff at one term to continue the cause by affidavit, and at another term he obtained leave of the Court for time to prepare for the trial of the cause — he moreover had caused his witnesses to be subpcgned to the first term of the Superior Court. It seems to us, that this case is within the principle and reason of the case of *Den on Demise of Wallace*& *Walters*v *Corbitt,*decided at this term (ante p. 45). All the facts and circumstances, disclosed by the case, *are,*we think, sufficient *to*raise an implied waiver by the defendant of an appeal bond. The judgment must be reversed, and a *procedendo awarded.*

Per Curiam, Judgment arrested and *procedendo*awarded.
**Exhibit 23.3**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of WasteServices, Inc. on Form S-3/A (File No. 333-116795) of our report dated March 20, 2003, except forthe effect of the restatement related to the beneficial conversion feature as described in Note 1to the financial statements included in the 2002 Form 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) of CapitalEnvironmental Resource Inc., which is as of November 4, 2003, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements, which appear in Waste Services Inc.’s Annual Report to Shareholders on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement.
**/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**
Chartered Accountants
Toronto, Canada
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 371 

Congratulating the Denver Broncos for winning Super Bowl 50. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2016 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Denver Broncos for winning Super Bowl 

50. 

Whereas, on February 7, 2016, the Denver Broncos won 

Super Bowl 50, defeating the Carolina Panthers by a 

score of 24-10 at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, California; 

Whereas the victory marks the third Super Bowl title for the 

Denver Broncos; 

Whereas the Broncos’ appearance in the Super Bowl was 

their National Football League record-tying eighth appearance; 

Whereas quarterback Peyton Manning earned his 200th career win; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 371 ATS 

Whereas linebacker Von Miller earned the Most Valuable 

Player award while recording 2 1⁄2 sacks and 2 forced 

fumbles; 

Whereas running back C.J. Anderson rushed for 90 yards 

and 1 touchdown; 

Whereas wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders caught 6 passes 

for 83 yards; 

Whereas defensive tackle Malik Jackson recorded 5 tackles 

and a defensive touchdown; 

Whereas wide receiver Jordan Norwood’s 61-yard punt return 

was the longest in Super Bowl history; 

Whereas head coach Gary Kubiak led the team to a Super 

Bowl victory in his first season as head coach of the 

Broncos; 

Whereas defensive coordinator Wade Phillips won the National Football League Assistant Coach of the Year 

award; 

Whereas Owner Pat Bowlen and the Bowlen family have 

owned the Denver Broncos since 1984 and led the team 

to 7 American Football Conference championships and 3 

Super Bowl victories, and the Broncos have the thirdhighest winning percentage among all professional sports 

teams during that period; 

Whereas Executive Vice President of Football Operations and 

General Manager of the Denver Broncos, John Elway, 

has helped lead the Broncos to 2 Super Bowl appearances in 5 seasons; and 

Whereas the Denver Broncos football team has proudly represented the City of Denver and the State of Colorado, 

and all of the loyal Broncos fans: Now, therefore, be it 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•SRES 371 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the Denver Broncos for win3 ning Super Bowl 50; 

4 (2) recognizes the achievements of all the play5 ers, coaches, and staff who contributed to the vic6 tory; and 

7 (3) requests that the Secretary of the Senate 

8 prepare an official copy of this resolution for presen9 tation to— 

10 (A) the Owner of the Denver Broncos, Pat 

11 Bowlen; 

12 (B) the President and CEO of the Denver 

13 Broncos, Joe Ellis; and 

14 (C) the Head Coach of the Denver Bron15 cos, Gary Kubiak. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Amendment to Deferred Stock Award Agreement - Comverse and Raz Alon



 Exhibit 10.45 
 

 
 May 30, 2008 

Raz Alon 
 Topview Ventures 

2225 East Bayshore Road, Suite 219 
 Palo Alto,
CA 94303 
  

	Re:	Amendment to the Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Deferred Stock Award Agreement”) dated effective as of December 5, 2007 between Comverse
Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) and Raz Alon 

 Dear Raz: 

Pursuant to the terms of the Deferred Stock Award Agreement, the Company is required to deliver to you on January 1, 2009 the number
of shares of Company common stock equal to the aggregate number of Granted Units (as defined in the Deferred Stock Award Agreement) that vest as of such date (i.e., 10,000 shares of Company common stock The Compensation Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors has determined that it would be beneficial to amend your Deferred Stock Award Agreement to provide greater flexibility as to the timing of the delivery of the 10,000 shares of Company common stock which will vest on
January 1, 2009 in order to alleviate the possibility of the vested Company common stock being required to be delivered to you (and taxable to you) when the Company common stock is not subject to an effective registration statement and/or other
restrictions on the resale of such stock. Accordingly, upon your execution of this letter amendment below and delivery to the Company by June 30, 2008, the Deferred Stock Award Agreement is hereby amended by adding
the following as the last sentence of Section 4: 
 “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 4, the
number of shares of Common Stock deliverable to the Grantee in respect of any Granted Units which vest in calendar year 2009 shall be deliverable to the Grantee on the first date within the “short-term deferral period” (as defined in
Treasury Reg. §1.409A-l(b)(4)) on which there is an Effective Registration (as defined below) in place, but in no event later than March 15, 2010; provided, however, that in the event of the Grantee’s Service Termination
in accordance with Section 3(b) prior to March 15, 2010, the number of shares of Common Stock in respect of any Granted Units which are vested as of the Termination Date shall be delivered to the Grantee on the Termination Date. For
purposes of this Section 4, “Effective Registration” shall mean the registration of the shares of Common Stock granted to the Grantee hereunder pursuant to an effective registration statement on Form S-8 or any successor form under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and no restrictions under applicable law apply to the resale of such shares of Common Stock at the time of delivery of such shares of Common Stock.” 







 Except as expressly herein amended, the terms and conditions of the Deferred Stock Award
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
  

			
	COMVERSE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Andre Dahan
	Name:	 	Andre Dahan
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer



 

	
	Accepted and Agreed as of May 30, 2008:
	
	/s/ Raz Alon
	Raz Alon

  

 2
EXHIBIT 99-1

NEWS RELEASE


Contact:
Dick Becht
716/655-3800


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



                 ACME ELECTRIC ANNOUNCES YEAR-END RESULTS


     EAST AURORA, N.Y., August 5, 1999  -- Acme Electric Corporation (NYSE:
ACE) reported today that, for the year ended June 30, 1999, sales were
$79,813,000 with net income of $2,707,000, or $.53 per share, compared to
sales of $90,916,000 and net income of $2,529,000, or $.50 per share, for
the prior year.
     Robert J. McKenna, Chairman and CEO, said, "During the year, we have
achieved many of our strategic objectives, including establishing a basis
for increased sales over time, strengthening our balance sheet, and
significantly improving the efficiency and profitability of our operations.
We are particularly pleased that these efforts enabled Acme to report
higher earnings on a smaller revenue base.
     The decline in sales was attributable to the previously announced loss
of a major customer in our electronics business, due to a consolidation
process that favored multi-national suppliers much larger than Acme.  Our
prompt response to this situation helped produce improved financial
performance reported for the year.
     A key driver of Acme's future revenue growth is our continuing
commitment to developing both new products and customer relationships.  We
have made considerable progress in both areas.
     During the year, we introduced several new products, including a line
of quick-to-install DIN-rail mounted power supplies and a new line of back-
up power units for the cable industry.  Customer response has been very
positive.
     We also established new relationships with several major OEM
customers.  As an important strategic supplier to each company, we expect
these new relationships to provide Acme with many new profitable growth
opportunities in the future."
     Founded in 1917, Acme Electric Corporation is a leader in the design
and manufacture of power conversion equipment for electronic and electrical
systems for industrial, commercial, residential, military and aerospace
applications.  Corporate headquarters are in East Aurora, N.Y., with
operations in Cuba, N.Y., Lumberton, N.C., and Tempe, Ariz.
                                  # # # #

<PAGE>

ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION

Comparative Analysis
(in thousands, except for per share data)


                         For the Year Ended  For the 13 Weeks Ended
                         06/30/99  06/30/98  06/30/99  06/30/98


Net Sales                 $79,813   $90,916   $19,532   $23,633
Net Income                 $2,707  $  2,529    $1,021    $1,276
Net Income Per
 Common Share
 (Basic and Diluted)         $.53      $.50      $.20      $.25
Weighted Number of Shares
 Outstanding Used to Compute
 Net Income Per
 Common Share:
  Basic                     5,060     5,046     5,068     5,050
  Diluted                   5,091     5,060     5,110     5,065
#### STATE v. ALFRED WHITE.

*Jurisdiction*— *Town Ordinances*— *By whom executed.*

1. The Superior Court has no original jurisdiction to try indictments for violation of town ordinances, and the Act of li>71, Chapter 195, does not confer jurisdiction.

Town authorities have the power to execute the police laws adopted for the government thereof.

*(Stole*v. *Threadijill*at this Term, and *¡State*v. Brookshanlc, 6 Ire., 73, cited and approved.)

• INDICTMENT for misdemeanor tried at Spring Term, 1876, of Halifax Superior Court, before *Watts, J.*

The defendant was charged with selling spirtuous liquors on Sunday, in the town of Scotland Neck, in violation of an ordinance of said town.-' On the trial in the Court below, the defendant moved to quash the bill of indictment for *16want of jurisdiction, which motion was allowed, and the State appealed.

*Attorney*General, for the State.

*Mr. Thos. N. Hill,*for the defendant.

Bynum, J.

This case is governed by the *State*v. *Threadgill,*decided at this term of the Court. It is there held, that the Superior Court has no original jurisdiction to indict for the violation of town ordinances, but that the town only,, through its proper officers and machinery of government. must execute its own police laws.

The indictment here is based upon a misconstruction of the Act of 1871, cb. 195. That Act consists of but two sections. The first section gives to the chief officers of cities, and towns the jurisdiction and powers of Justices of the Peace, over crimes committed within their corporations. The second section makes any violation of anj" ordinance of such cities and towns, a misdemeanor, “subject to the provisions of this Act,” What provisions ? The only provisions are in the first section, which do no more than confer the jurisdiction of Justices of the Peace upon the chief officers of cities and towns. Manifestly then, the purpose of the second section of the Act, if it has any meaning at all, -was to give to Mayors, &c., final jurisdiction to hear and determine as misdemeanors, all violations of town ordinances where the offence and its punishment are cognizable by a Justice of the Peace. However that may be, most clearly no jurisdiction is conferred expressly or by fair implication, upon the Superior Courts. The Act itself creates no new offence. Selling spirituous liquors on the_ Sabbath, for which the defendant is indicted, is not an indictable offence ’either at common law or by statute. *State*v. *Brookshank,*6 Ired., 73.

No error. This will be certified.

Per Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 938 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 174
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 938

                          [Report No. 106-92]

To eliminate restrictions on the acquisition of certain land contiguous 
       to Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 1999

 Mr. Akaka (for himself and Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                             June 24, 1999

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To eliminate restrictions on the acquisition of certain land contiguous 
       to Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hawaii Volcanoes National Park 
Adjustment Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RESTRICTIONS ON LAND ACQUISITION.

    The first section of the Act entitled ``An Act to add certain lands 
on the island of Hawaii to the Hawaii National Park, and for other 
purposes'', approved June 20, 1938 (16 U.S.C. 391b), is amended by 
striking ``park: Provided,'' and all that follows and inserting ``park. 
Land (including the land depicted on the map entitled `NPS-PAC 1997HW') 
may be acquired by the Secretary through donation, exchange, or 
purchase with donated or appropriated funds.''.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 174

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 938

                          [Report No. 106-92]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To eliminate restrictions on the acquisition of certain land contiguous 
       to Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 24, 1999

                       Reported without amendment`