alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
contains ultraviolet (UV) radiation,

uses premature aging of the skin,

, cataracts, and skin cancer. The amount

ge from UV exposure depends on the

 of the light, the length of exposure, and

 the skin is protected. There are no safe

or safe suntans.

ancer

sure at any age can cause skin cancer. Be 

y careful in the sun if you burn easily, spend a

ecting

rself in

Sun

ecting

rself in

un

lot of time outdoors, or have any of the following physical features:

Numerous, irregular, or large moles.Freckles.Fair skin.Blond, red, or light brown hair.

Self-ExaminationIt’s important to examine your body monthly becauseskin cancers detected early can almost always be cured.The most important warning sign is a spot on the skinthat is changing in size, shape, or color during a periodof 1 month to 1 or 2 years. Skin cancers often take the following forms:

Pale, wax-like, pearly nodules.Red, scaly, sharply outlined patches.Sores that don’t heal.Small, mole-like growths—melanoma, the most serious type of skin cancer.

If you find such unusual skin changes, see a health care professional immediately.
Block Out UV Rays

up.

Wear tightly-woven clothing that blocks

ht. Try this test: Place your hand between a

ayer of the clothing and a light source. If 

n see your hand through the fabric, the 

nt offers little protection.

nscreen. A sun protection factor (SPF) of at

5 blocks 93 percent of UV rays. You want to

oth UVA and UVB rays to guard against skin

 Be sure to follow application directions 

bottle.

 hat. A wide brim hat (not a baseball cap) 

 because it protects the neck, ears, eyes,

ad, nose, and scalp.

UV-absorbent shades. Sunglasses don’t 

o be expensive, but they should block 99 to

rcent of UVA and UVB ra

diation.

xposure. UV rays are most intense 

en 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. If you’re unsure about

n’s intensity, take the shadow test: If your

w is shorter than you, the sun’s rays are 

y’s strongest. 

Preventing Skin CancerFor more information about preventing, detecting, 

and treating skin cancer, check out these sources:American Cancer Society www.cancer.org1-800-ACS-2345Centers for Disease Control and Pre

vention 

www.cdc.gov/sun-safet

y-tips-e

mployers.htm

1-888-842-6355The Skin Cancer Found

ation

www.skincancer.org1-800-SKIN-490

www.osha.gov U.S. Department of Labor

OSHA 3166-06R 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000926978
<NAME>                        Frederick Brewing Co.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-Mos      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1 
<CASH>                                            245,455 
<SECURITIES>                                            0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                     536,441 
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0 
<INVENTORY>                                       417,729 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,556,352 
<PP&E>                                          9,583,176 
<DEPRECIATION>                                    744,448 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,335,988 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,244,902 
<BONDS>                                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0 
<PREFERRED>                                     3,335,248 
<COMMON>                                              127 
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,587,741 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,335,988 
<SALES>                                         1,072,961 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,072,961 
<CGS>                                             949,904 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,133,214 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 95,927 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,211,591)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0 
<CHANGES>                                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,211,591)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.44)
                                                          


</TABLE>
Docket No: FAA-2012-1293 

Directorate ID: 2012-NE-45 

Disposition Comments 

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP03881EN-E 

Next Step: D FRAN D SNPRM 

D These comments are in 

response to an SNPRM 

IZI No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received- If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required. 

Yes/No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? 

If yes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the 

previously published NP RM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point 

for guidance. Latest Revision. 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1 C Chapter 9. 

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: Choose one. 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): Click here to enter text. 

What change to the AD action is requested? Click here to enter text. 

Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? Click here to enter text. 

Do we agree? Yes/No 

IfYES, we agree because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with Insert text because Insert justification We disagree with 

Insert text because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD 

If NO, we don't agree because Insert our rationale 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: Choose one. 

If other, explain: Click here to enter text. 

Commenter(s): Click here to enter text. 

What change to the AD action is requested? Click here to enter text. 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Click here to enter text. 

Do we agree? Yes/No 

Page 1 of 3 
IfYES, we agree because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD 

IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with Insert text because Insert justification We disagree with 

Insert text because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD 

If NO, we don't agree because Insert our rationale 

For additional issues, double-click here 

Page 2 of3 
Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action. 

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP03881EN-E 

Martin Adler 3/6/17 

ASE Printed Name: Date 

Eugene Triozzi 3/6/17 

Branch Manager Date 

Page 3 of3
<PAGE>

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Anza  Capital,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  October 31, 2004, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on or  about  the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Vincent Rinehart,  President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Sections
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  Information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  December 17, 2004                       /s/  Vincent Rinehart
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By:  Vincent Rinehart
                                                Its:  President


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anza Capital,  Inc. and will be retained by Anza  Capital,  Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### E. K. Range, Executor of Alvira Shearer, Deceased, *v.*Thomas M. Culbertson, Appellant.

Judgment— *Opening judgment.*

The refusal of the court below to open a judgment when the testimony is conflicting will not be disturbed by the supreme court.

Argued April 30, 1895.

Appeal, No. 75, Jan. T., 1895, by defendant, from order of C. P. Erie Co., MayT., 1898, No. 588, discharging a rule to open judgment.

Before Williams, Mc-Collum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.

Affirmed.

Rule to open judgment.

From the record it appeared that T. M. Culbertson owed Alvira Shearer $621, on a judgment note dated May 1, 1892. Alvira died on April 3,1893. On July 26,1893, the judgment note was entered up by the executor. On a rule to open the judgment, defendant offered in evidence a paper dated Oct. 27, 1892, as follows:

“ $500.00 Le Boeuee, Oct. 27, 1892.

“ I, Alvira Shearer, promise to give $500.00 to Nancy Culbertson out of note I hold against T. M. Culbertson.

(Signed) “Alvira Sheareb, X-

“ *Witness:*

“ Grant Culbertson.”

The execution and delivery of this paper were denied by plaintiff.

Nancy Culbertson was the wife of T. M. Culbertson, and daughter of Alvira Shearer. There was no evidence that at the time the above paper was signed Alvira Shearer owed anything to her daughter Nancy Culbertson.

The court discharged the rule to open judgment. Defendant appealed.

*Error assigned*was above order.

*S. M. Brainerd, Geo. H. Higgins*with him, for appellant.

*325
      *E. A.*Walling, *T. A. Lamb*with him, for appellee.

May 20, 1895:

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from the refusal of the court below to open a judgment, and requires an examination of the evidence rather than of any legal question. We have examined the evidence as it appears upon the paper-books. The learned trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses and hearing them. His conscience was not moved by the testimony, and we are not inclined to disturb his conclusion.

The appeal from his refusal to open the judgment is dismissed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DOROTHY LAFORTUNE,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

DAVID J. SHULKIN, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2016-2350

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 15-1381, Judge Mary J. Schoelen.

______________________ 

Decided: September 8, 2017

______________________ 

 KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law Offices of Carpenter 

Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant.

 SARAH CHOI, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by JOYCE R. BRANDA, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR.,

ALLISON KIDD-MILLER; Y. KEN LEE, MARTIE ADELMAN, 

CHRISTINA LYNN GREGG, Office of General Counsel, Unit-
2 LAFORTUNE v. SHULKIN

ed States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, 

DC.

______________________ 

Before MOORE, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. 

Our jurisdiction to review decisions by the Veterans 

Court is limited by statute. Unless an appeal raises a 

constitutional issue, we lack jurisdiction to review “a 

challenge to a factual determination” or “a challenge to a 

law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular 

case.” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2). The issues raised on appeal 

are all limited to the appeal of fact findings as to whether 

Ms. LaFortune and the veteran entered into a civil/ceremonial or common-law marriage. We see no question of law. Because Ms. LaFortune’s appeal only involves 

factual determinations and the application of law to the 

facts of the case, Ms. LaFortune’s appeal is beyond the 

scope of our jurisdiction. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

DISSMISSED 

COSTS

No costs.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Jay Isco, as Chief Financial Officer of MotivNation, Inc.,certify that:

> 
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB		for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of MotivNation, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not		contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a		material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the		circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with		respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,		and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly		present in all material respects the financial condition, results of		operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods		presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I		are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and		procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))		for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and				procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to				be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material				information relating to the registrant is made known to us by				others within the company, particularly during the period in				which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the				registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in				this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the				disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period				covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this annual report any				change in the registrant's internal control over financial				reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent				fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the				case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is				reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's				internal control over financial reporting; and 

> 
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I		have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls		over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit		committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing		the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material				weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over				financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely				affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize				and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that				involves management or other employees who have a significant				role in the registrant's internal controls and over financial				reporting.

Date: May 9, 2005

/s/ Jay Isco                                   

Jay Isco

Chief Financial Officer
#### Minton, Appellant, vs. Beck and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Wilbershide & Bmmblatt*of Racine.

For the respondent Thorwald M. Beck: *Vilas H. Whaley*of Racine.

For the respondent George A. Nelson: Thompson, *Myers & Helm*of Racine.

For the respondent Roy A. Spencer: *Foley & Brack*of Racine.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2269-E2270]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          EARMARK DECLARATION

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. TERRY EVERETT

                               of alabama

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. EVERETT. Madam Speaker, pursuant to the Republican Leadership 
standards on earmarks, I submit the following information regarding one 
earmark I received as part of H.R. 2638, the Consolidated Security, 
Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act (P.L. 110-329).
  Requesting Member: Congressman Terry Everett.
  Bill Number: H.R. 2638, the Consolidated Security, Disaster 
Assistance and Continuing Appropriations Act.
  Account: Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDTE), U.S. 
Army.
  Legal Name of Requesting Entity: Lockheed Martin.

[[Page E2270]]

  Address of Requesting Entity: Pike County, Alabama.
  Description of Request: The Close Combat Missile System Modernization 
for Javelin earmark funding is for $3,700,000. This funding will help 
the Army meet its requirements in the Concept Development doctrine 
stating that the Javelin missile be modernized to meet modern and 
irregular warfare needs. The modernization addresses known obsolescence 
issues such as parts replacement and decreasing inventory levels.
  Javelin has been in production since 1994. This modernization program 
will move the missile closer to its objective performance standard, 
while maintaining cost effective production levels and help sustain the 
industrial base.
  The funding is to be used to evolve Javelin capabilities and address 
the requirements stated in the Joint Service Operational Requirement 
for Advanced Anti-Armor Weapons Systems-Medium.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CyberGuard Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Patrick J. Clawson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Patrick J. Clawson                                     
|Patrick J. Clawson Chief Executive Officer February 4, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           K-Tron International, Inc.

                              List of Subsidiaries*

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           State or Jurisdiction
Name of Subsidiary                                                         of Incorporation
------------------                                                         ---------------------
<S>                                                                        <C>
K-Tron Investment Co..................................................      Delaware
        Hurricane Pneumatic Conveying Inc.............................      Canada
        K-Tron America, Inc...........................................      Delaware
               Colormax Limited.......................................      United Kingdom
               Pneumatic Conveying Systems Limited ...................      United Kingdom
        K-Tron (Schweiz) AG...........................................      Switzerland
               K-Tron Asia Pacific Holding Pte Ltd. ..................      Singapore
                      K-Tron Asia Pacific Pte ........................      Singapore
               K-Tron China Limited...................................      Hong Kong
               K-Tron Deutschland GmbH................................      Germany
               K-Tron France S.a.r.l..................................      France
               K-Tron Great Britain Ltd...............................      United Kingdom
K-Tron Technologies, Inc..............................................      Delaware
</TABLE>


*      Pursuant to applicable Securities and Exchange Commission regulations,
       the Registrant has omitted those subsidiaries which when considered in
       the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not have been considered a
       significant subsidiary as of the end of fiscal year 2001.