alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Guaranty Bond Bank, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00112

- CV v.

Jeff and Erica Fouche, et al

. , Appellee s Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 08C

0323

- 005 ). Memorandum Opinion d elivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the joint motion of the parties to dismiss the appeal by agreement should be granted. Therefore, it is ordered that the judgment of the trial court below is set aside, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of rendering a judgment in accord with the parties ’ settlement agreement, and the appeal is

dismissed

. We further order that each party shall bear i ts own costs of appeal.

RENDERED JANUARY 30, 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# Official Journal C 358/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 358 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 614 October 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 358

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 614 October 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European ParliamentCouncil |
| 2018/C 358/01 | Joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission relating to Regulation (EU) 2018/1475 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the legal framework of the European Solidarity Corps and amending Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013, Regulation (EU) No 1293/2013 and Decision No 1313/2013/EU | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European ParliamentCouncil

2018/C 358/01

Joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission relating to Regulation (EU) 2018/1475 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the legal framework of the European Solidarity Corps and amending Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013, Regulation (EU) No 1293/2013 and Decision No 1313/2013/EU

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10678]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             SPECIAL ORDERS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Ms. Clarke). Under the Speaker's announced 
policy of January 18, 2007, and under a previous order of the House, 
the following Members will be recognized for 5 minutes each.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-5186
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MELVIN WARREN JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-05-156) Submitted: August 25, 2006 Decided: September 13, 2006 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Devon L. Donahue, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Melvin Warren Johnson was convicted of possessing with intent to distribute cocaine (Count 1), maintaining a place for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing and using cocaine (Count 2), possessing firearms and ammunition by a convicted felon (Count 3), and possessing firearms in furtherance of the drug trafficking crimes alleged in Counts 1 and 2, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c) (West Supp. 2006) (Count 4). He timely appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for Count 4. Viewing the evidence as required, United States v. Burgos , 94 F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir. 1996), we find there was substantial evidence to support Johnson’s § 924(c) conviction for Count 4. Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). We reject Johnson’s argument that there was insufficient evidence that the guns at issue were in furtherance of his drug trafficking. United States v. Lomax, 293 F.3d 701, 705 (4th Cir. 2002). To the extent that Johnson alleges erroneous jury instructions regarding Count 4, this court only reviews for plain error, because he failed to object to the instructions below. Fed. R. Crim. P. Rule 30(d). We find no plain error in the district court’s instructions for Count 4. United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 731-32 (1993) (giving review standard for plain error).- 3 - Accordingly, we affirm Johnson’s convictions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6442

DONNIE LEE BRUCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAUL M. PEATROSS; JAMES L. CAMBLOSS, III;

CHERYL HIGGINS; DENISE Y. LUNSFORD; DEBORAH K.

HITE; EARL SHIFFLETT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-97-163-2)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnie Lee Bruce, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal

is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court and deny Appellant's "Motion to Amend." Bruce

v. Peatross, No. CA-97-163-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
AMENDMENT TO SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT TO THE SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT dated as of the
30th day of September 2010 (the "Amendment") between GENESIS
ELECTRONICS GROUP, INC. (the "Company"), and TANGIERS INVESTORS, LP
("Investor")

WHEREAS, the parties have entered into that certain Securities Purchase
Agreement dated May 10, 2010, issued by the Company to provide
financing to the Company (the "Agreement");

WHEREAS, the Company and Investor now desire to enter into this
Amendment to amend certain terms of the Agreement as described herein
and set forth below;

NOW, THEREFORE, the terms of the Agreement are hereby amended as
follows:

Section 1.  Amendments.  The Agreement is amended by deleting
Section 7 (j) in its entirety and any and all references thereto
shall have no further force or validity under the Agreement:

Section 2.   Other Provisions.  The other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in effect as is and shall be equally
applicable to this Amendment.


(Signatures Follow)












<PAGE>2

GENESIS ELECTRONICS GROUP, INC.

By:   /s/ Edward Dillon
      ------------------------
      Edward Dillon
      Chief Executive Officer

TANGIERS INVESTORS, LP

By:   /s/ Michael Sobeck
      -----------------------
      Michael Sobeck, Partner


2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         756,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,108,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,629,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,677,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,127,000
<PP&E>                                       6,997,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,986,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,174,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,746,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,465,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,174,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,732,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,316,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             164,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Final Notes July 9, 2010

Steam Study Data Review Notes

Chloride and Sulfate EPA Method 300.0

(Ion Chromatography)

1. If residual chlorine dioxide is suspected in sample, the sample should be purged with an 

inert gas for at least five minutes (300.0/4.8).

2. Samples containing particles larger than 0.45 μm and reagents containing particles larger 

than 0.2 μm should be filtered prior to analysis (300.0/4.4).

3. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 5 times the analyte concentration 

in the laboratory reagent blank, the result should be reported as a nondetect. List all 

affected samples:

4. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 10 times but greater than 5 times 

the analyte concentration in the laboratory reagent blank, the result should be reported as 

an estimated value. List all affected samples:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 89669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26285]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 28, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 555 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-182, K2025-180.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26285 Filed 11-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Każdy może stać się ofiarą handlu ludźmi.

Jeśli jesteś nakłaniany, rekrutowany lub transportowany do pracy, usług lub 

seksu komercyjnego przez kogoś, kto używa siły, oszustwa lub przymusu, 

jest to handel ludźmi.

Cele handlu ludźmi: pracownicy nieposiadający dokumentów, 

tymczasowi pracownicy zagraniczni, osoby zażywające substancje 

psychoaktywne, osoby cierpiące na zaburzenia psychiczne, bezdomna lub 

uciekająca młodzież oraz osoby doświadczające trudności ekonomicznych.

Oznaki handlu ludźmi:

• używa siły, oszustwa, obietnic lub kontroli psychologicznej

• zmusza do długich godzin pracy lub wykonywania niebezpiecznej pracy

• zapewnia niskie wynagrodzenie lub jego brak, wstrzymując wypłaty

• może grozić Tobie lub Twoim bliskim

• kontroluje Twoją mobilność, mieszkanie, dostęp do pieniędzy lub osoby, 

z którymi możesz rozmawiać, oraz

• ukrywa przed Tobą Twój dowód osobisty lub paszport.

Handel pracownikami jest bardziej powszechny w rolnictwie lub na farmach, 

budownictwie, owocach morza, architekturze krajobrazu, hotelach, restauracjach 

i pracach domowych.

Jeśli Ty lub ktoś, kogo znasz, znajduje się w środowisku, w którym 

podejrzewa się handel ludźmi, zadzwoń pod numer 911.

Ty lub ktoś, komu ufasz, może również zadzwonić na infolinię National 

Human Trafficking Hotline pod numer 1-888-373-7888; wysłać SMS o treści 

“BeFree” (233733); lub LiveChat humantraffickinghotline.org.

IDENTYFIKACJA I ZGŁASZANIE

osha.gov/workers

OSHA 4344-08 2023 | Polish

HANDLU

LUDŹMI

Administracja 

Bezpieczeństwa i 

Higieny Pracy
**                               **                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1.

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Dr. Thomas Drees, Chief Executive Officer, and David Nelson, Principal Accounting Officer, of Sanguine Corporation (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2009 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

Dated:  August 20, 2009

By:  /s/ Dr. Thomas Drees

                            

        Dr. Thomas Drees

                           

        Chief Executive Officer

By:  /s/  David Nelson

       David Nelson, Chief Financial Officer

 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanguine Corporation and will be retained by Sanguine Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 29, 2010

d0922 

# Order

September 29, 2010

140945

KEVIN KROHN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140945 COA: 283862 Lenawee CC: 06-002176-NF HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1 ) whether the experimental surgical procedure that the plaintiff underwent in Portugal wa s a “reasonably necessary” allowable expense under the no-fault act, MCL 500 .3107(1)(a); (2) whether th e procedure was “lawfully rendered” under MCL 500.3157, given that it is not approved to be performed in this country by the United States Food and Dr ug Administration (FDA); (3) whether the Court of Appeals erred in sua sponte raising the issue whether the trial court failed to perform its gatekeeper function under MRE 702 and People v Davis , 343 Mich 348 (1955); Frye v United States , 54 App DC 46; 293 F 1013 (1923), to exclude testimony from the plaintiff’s medical w itness regarding the experiment al surgical procedure, see Craig v Oakwood Hosp , 471 Mich 67, 82 (2004); (4) whether the Court of Appeals properly relied on SPECT Imaging, Inc v Allstate Ins Co , 246 Mich App 568, 578-579 (2001), for the proposition that a no-fault insurer is only liabl e for scientifically proven medical tests or procedures; and (5) whether the issue of reasonable necessity under MCL 500.3107(1)(a) may include consideration by th e trier of fact of the success of the experimental procedure or of any degree of improvement in the plaintiff’s condition.

The Michigan Association for Justice and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel,
Inc. are invited to file briefs amicus curiae . Other persons or gro ups interested in the determination of the issues presented in th is case may move the Co urt for permission to
file briefs amicus curiae.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2264]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 IN RECOGNITION OF MR. WOODFIN K. GROVE

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. MIKE ROGERS

                               of alabama

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Madam Speaker, I would like to request the 
House's attention today to pay recognition to a special day in the life 
of a constituent of mine, Mr. Woodfin K. Grove.
  On October 23rd, Mr. Grove will celebrate his 90th birthday. To help 
commemorate this special occasion, his friends and church family are 
surprising him with a dinner at The Bridge at First United Methodist 
Church in Anniston, Alabama, on October 22nd.
  Woodfin K. Grove was born in Birmingham, Alabama, and was an only 
child. He graduated from Ensley High School and Birmingham Southern, 
both located in Birmingham. He received his degree in Theology from 
Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Grove married Dorothy Rowland 
with whom he had one daughter, Ann, and one grandson, John.
  Today Mr. Grove is loved by everyone. He is known for his good advice 
to those around him and serves as a wise leader in his church. He and 
his wife, Dot, both are young at heart and have been known to ride 
around Anniston on his motorcycle or in his sports car. They attend 
First United Methodist Church in Anniston where he became Pastor 
Emeritus in 2001.
  I would like to congratulate Mr. Grove on reaching this important 
milestone in his life. I wish him a happy birthday and the best in the 
future.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88848-88849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26041]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20759 and #20760; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-
20015]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Florida

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4834-DR), dated October 
11, 2024.
    Incident: Hurricane Milton.

DATES: Issued on November 4, 2024.
    Incident Period: October 5, 2024 through November 2, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: December 10, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: July 11, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

[[Page 88849]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Florida, dated October 11, 2024, is hereby 
amended to update the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
October 5, 2024 and continuing through November 2, 2024.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-26041 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
# C_2016181EN.01000101.xml

| 19.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2013-2014 SESSION

Sittings of 7 to 10 October 2013

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 13 E, 17.1.2014.

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 13 E, 17.1.2014.

The text adopted of 9 October 2013 concerning the discharge for the financial year 2011 has been published in OJ L 328, 7.12.2013.

The text adopted of 9 October 2013 concerning the discharge for the financial year 2011 has been published in OJ L 328, 7.12.2013.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10422]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              KENNETH PETER ZEBROWSKI POST OFFICE BUILDING

  The bill (S. 3625) to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 245 North Main Street in New York, New York, 
as the ``Kenneth Peter Zebrowski Post Office Building,'' was ordered to 
be engrossed for a third reading, was read the third time, and passed, 
as follows:

                                S. 3625

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. KENNETH PETER ZEBROWSKI POST OFFICE BUILDING.

       (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
     Service located at 245 North Main Street in New City, New 
     York, shall be known and designated as the ``Kenneth Peter 
     Zebrowski Post Office Building''.
       (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
     document, paper, or other record of the United States to the 
     facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 
     a reference to the ``Kenneth Peter Zebrowski Post Office 
     Building''.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 172 (Thursday, November 6, 2008)]
[House]
[Page S10529]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 154

WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2008

No. 172
```