alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 398 

Designating March 15, 2016, as ‘‘National Speech and Debate Education 

Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2016 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. COONS, and Mr. KING) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 15, 2016, as ‘‘National Speech and 

Debate Education Day’’. 

Whereas it is essential for youth to learn and practice the art 

of communicating with and without technology; 

Whereas speech and debate education offers students myriad 

forms of public speaking through which students may develop talent and exercise unique voice and character; 

Whereas speech and debate education gives students the 

21st-century skills of communication, critical thinking, 

creativity, and collaboration; 

Whereas critical analysis and effective communication allow 

important ideas, texts, and philosophies the opportunity 

to flourish; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 398 ATS 

Whereas personal, professional, and civic interactions are enhanced by the ability of the participants in those interactions to listen, concur, question, and dissent with reason and compassion; 

Whereas students who participate in speech and debate have 

chosen a challenging activity that requires regular practice, dedication, and hard work; 

Whereas teachers and coaches of speech and debate devote 

in-school, afterschool, and weekend hours to equip students with life-changing skills and opportunities; 

Whereas National Speech and Debate Education Day emphasizes the lifelong impact of providing people of the United 

States with the confidence and preparation to both discern and share views; 

Whereas National Speech and Debate Education Day acknowledges that most achievements, celebrations, commemorations, and pivotal moments in modern history 

begin, end, or are crystallized with public address; 

Whereas National Speech and Debate Education Day recognizes that learning to research, construct, and present an 

argument is integral to personal advocacy, social movements, and the making of public policy; 

Whereas the National Speech & Debate Association, in conjunction with national and local partners, honors and 

celebrates the importance of speech and debate through 

National Speech and Debate Education Day; and 

Whereas National Speech and Debate Education Day emphasizes the importance of speech and debate education and 

the integration of speech and debate education across 

grade levels and disciplines: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 398 ATS 

1 (1) designates March 15, 2016, as ‘‘National 

2 Speech and Debate Education Day’’; 

3 (2) strongly affirms the purposes of National 

4 Speech and Debate Education Day; and 

5 (3) encourages educational institutions, busi6 nesses, community and civic associations, and all 

7 people of the United States to celebrate and promote 

8 National Speech and Debate Education Day. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Li Shaoming, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      January 12, 2010
              /s/ Li ShaomingBy:
      Li ShaomingIts:
      Chief Executive Officer
船厂工作

保护工人免受密闭空间内热病

在密闭空间工作可能会增加工人患热病的风险。

• 这里的温度经常高于室外空气。

• 气流通常很低

• 个人防护装备 (PPE) 可能引起身体过热
了解热病的体征

一有热病症状就采取行动。热病会迅速恶化。如果有疑问,请拨打 911!

如果工人发生:

• 头痛或恶心

• 虚弱或头晕

• 大量出汗或皮肤干热

• 体温升高

• 口渴

• 尿量减少

采取以下措施:

• 离开密闭空间

• 转移到凉爽的地方

• 给予饮用水

• 脱掉个人防护装备和不必要的衣服

• 用水、冰或风扇降温

• 不要让患者独处

• 如有需要,应就医

9-1-1

以下是医疗紧急情况的体征!

• 思维或行为异常

• 说话含糊不清

• 痫性发作

• 意识丧失

立即拨打 911 

立即用水或冰为工人降温

留在工人身边,直到救援人员抵达
您可以做什么来预防热病

制定计划并提供培训

• 制定预防热病的计划,并将其传

达给主管和工人。计划应包括监

测、适应、作息安排和紧急情况

等要素。

• 对所有工人进行热病风险、症状

和应对程序以及预防措施的培

训。

制定工作计划

• 让新工人和返工工人建立对高

温的耐受性(适应),并经常休

息。遵循 20% 规则。本安全规程

规定,第一天在高温下全强度

工作的时间不超过当班时间的

20%。每天增加不超过 20% 的全

强度工作时间,直到工人习惯在

高温下工作。

• 根据高温条件调整工作时间或白

天工作时间。考虑让工人轮岗。

• 允许经常停下来休息。考虑到

温度、湿度和工作条件,休息时

间应该足够长,让工人从高温

中恢复过来。

制定控制措施和监测现场活动

• 工作前检查空间内的温度。当

计划户外活动时,使用OSHANIOSH 热安全工具应用程序。

• 对空间进行通风,引入较冷的

空气,形成气流。

• 实行搭档制度,让工人们互相

监控自己和对方的热病体征。

• 指定一个阴凉的地方用于休

息。

• 提供清凉的饮用水。鼓励工人

每 20 分钟至少喝一杯。

• 尽可能让工人穿宽松透气的

衣服。
了解更多信息:1-800-321-OSHA (6742) 

TTY 1-877-889-5627 

www.osha.gov/heat 

要详细了解有关其他密闭空间危害的信息,请访问

www.osha.gov/maritime。

联邦法律赋予您在安全工作场所工作的权利。您对危险有权发言,

而不必担心遭到报复。

访问 www.osha.gov/workers,了解如何向 OSHA 提交保密投诉,并

要求检查。

扫描二维码获取更多信息。

OSHA 4352-08 2023
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7248

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KENNETH ROSHAUN REID , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. ( 0:04

- cr
- 00353

- CMC

- 1 )

Submitted : December 18 , 2018 Decided: December 21, 2018

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judge s
.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kenneth Roshaun Reid , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Roshaun Reid seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his
motio n seeking correction of his sentence. We conclude that Reid ’s motion was in substance a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The district court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong.
Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S . 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the
motion states a de batable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85.
Reid ’s motion challenged the validity of his sentence and should have been construed as a successive § 2255 motion. * See Gonzalez v. Crosby , 545 U.S. 524, 531

- 32 (2005); U nited States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 207 (4th Cir. 2003). In the absence of

* The district court denied relief on Reid’s prior § 2255 motion on the merits in 2010.3 pre
- filing authorization from this court, the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear Reid’s successive § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) (2012). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
### RA//.WAY

January29, 2016
Mr. JakeTroutman Program Analyst 

## IRulemaking Airmen and Airspace Rules Division 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Gary Grissum Assistant Vice President Telecommunications BNSF Railway Company 2400 Western Center Blvd. FortWorth, Texas 76131-1322 817-352-1919 (phone) 817-352-3919 (fax) Gary.Grissum@bnsf.com

RE: Docket No. FAA-2015-75121 BNSF Railway Company Exemption Request 91.113
Dear Mr. Troutman: BNSF Railway Company submits the enclosed in response to yourJanuary 20, 2016 request for a description ofthe specific locations, dates and times regarding the proposed flight plans for BNSF Pathfinder phases 2 and 3. We respectfully note thatthe information regarding ourflight plans and candidate locations for Visual Line ofSight and Beyond Visual LineofSight is currently on file with the FAA PathfinderTearn and Experimental Airworthiness Team. BNSF Railwav submits the enclosed areas anrl flinht details for · BNSF Railway submits the aetans ror eacn ofthese areas as a confidential document under49 CFR 7.13 as the material contains trade secret and commercial proprietary information that BNSF has not and will not sharewith others except underappropriate confidentiality agreements. The material contains operating conditions and procedures that are not available to the public and are protected from release underthe Freedom of Information Act. See 5 USC 552et. seq. Yourtime and cooperation is much appreciated. We look forward to discussing this submission with you. In the interim, ifyou have any questions regarding our request that this submission betreated as Confidential, please do not hesitateto contact me. Sincerely,



# v/

**~4t//-** , \
... 

## /a"~;? 

# 7

**/::__p2.<-·;~<-------.__** Gary Grissum Assistant Vice President, Technology Services- Telecom
CC: Charles W. Shewmake Vice President and General Counsel
## Comments in Response to "Final rule; request for comments" Docket: FAA-2016-2843 Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-003-AD Comments have been received in response to: "Final rule; requestfor comments," Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered abo ve. (Pro ject engineer: Please review any comments to determine 

## if additional action is warranted. Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

## if

necessary. Then includeyour name and the date in the spaces provided , and return it to the AD directoratefocal. The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from : Daniel Henrique (Please check one) lSI These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or change ofthis AD. 

### 0 These comments have been fo und to contain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory action. 

### (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual F

AA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.) David Hatfield 

# 5/o:s/ ;;o; (p Name: Dat e :

(This form is p art ofthe official docket file for this AD action .)

Rev 0 (9/08)
**Exhibit 23.B****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements onForm S-3(File No. 333-82412,333-127797) andForm S-8 (FileNos. 333-127951,333-126599,333-126597,333-96959,333-26813,333-26831,333-26823,033-46519,033-49956,033-51851,033-57553,033-51853,333-75781,333-78949,333-78951,333-78979,333-94717,333-94719,333-64240, and333-31060) ofEl Paso Corporation of our report dated February 20,2006 relating to the financial statements, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of Midland CogenerationVenture L.P., which appears in thisForm 10-K./s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPDetroit, MichiganFebruary27, 2006
Exhibit 24(v)
POWER OF ATTORNEY


	KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, officer 
and/or director of ACCESS Corporation, an Ohio Corporation, which is 
about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, 
DC, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as 
amended, a 1998 Annual Report, hereby constitutes Mr. Newton D. Baker, 
his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of 
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and 
stead, in any and all capacities, to sign such 1998 Annual Report and 
any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits 
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact 
and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act 
and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, 
as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, 
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent 
or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by 
virtue hereof.
	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 
16th day of July, 1998.
						JAMES M. ANDERSON
						____________________
						James M. Anderson
#### MEREDITH CREWS v. JAMES A. CREWS.

A verdict for “ four hundred dollars in old bank money, interest from the-27th of May 1863, scaled at value at time,”' — is too uncertain to warrant a judgment thereupon.

*[Gibson*v. *Groner,*63 N. C. 10, and *Mitchell*v. *Henderson, Ib.*613, approved.)

Debt, tried before *Watts,*/., at Spring Term 1870 of Geahville Court.

No statement is necessary.

The defendant appealed.

*Rogers & Batchelor,*for the appellant.

*Hayes, contra.*

Settle, J.

The question for our consideration is, Did the verdict of the jury warrant the judgment which his Honor directed to be entered. The verdict is as follows, to-wit: “We find all issues in favor of the plaintiff, and assess his *537damages at tour hundred dollars in old bank-money, interest from the 27th day of May 1863, sealed at value at time.”' Thereupon the Court directed the clerk to enter the following judgment, to-wit: “That the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of four hundred and fifty-two dollars and seventy-four cents, the value of the bond declared on, of which three hundred and twenty-five dollars and thirty-seven cents is principal money, and the interest is one hundred and twenty-seven dollars and forty-one cents, and costs of suit.”

We have examined the verdict and judgment together, with all the statements which accompany the case, but we are at a loss to discover the process of calculation by which his Honor determined the amounts of principal and interest, which he directed to be entered as a judgment. Indeed, we think the verdict so vague and uncertain in its terms as to-afford no basis for a calculation: “A verdict finding matter uncertainly or ambiguously, is insufficient, and no judgment shall be given thereupon: Coke on Lit. p. 227 a.

Here the jury assessed the damages in *old bank-money,*by which we are to understand, the notes issued by old banks. But there were many banks whose notes circulated in this. State, and they were of different values, some worth five, and others twenty-five cents in the dollar. Which bank shall we select as the standard to govern in this case *?*

We are left without chart or compass, to find our way as. best we can.

Again the verdict says, “ *scaled*at value at time.” Scaled as what ? Confederate money, or bank notes ? If bank notes, we are aware of no standard by which they can be scaled; and the words “at time” are equally as unintelligible. *Gibson*v. *Groner,*63 N. C. 10, and *Mitchell*v. *Henderson, Ib.*643, establish the rule that the value of all contracts must be estimated in United States Treasury Notes, and judgment, be rendered for such amount solvable in currency.

*538Here there is no objection to the judgment on its tace, but .it- is not in pursuance of the verdict, which assessed damages in “old bank-money”; and as we have seen, was so unintelligible, that his Honor was not warranted in proceeding to judgment upon it.

Let it be certified that there was error, &c.

Per Curiam, *Venire de novo.*
# Official Journal L 116/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 116 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6513 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 116

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6513 April 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2022/625 of 13 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2022/626 of 13 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2022/263 concerning restrictive measures in response to the recognition of the non-government controlled areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and the ordering of Russian armed forces into those areas | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/627 of 13 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 6 |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/628 of 13 April 2022 amending Decision (CFSP) 2022/266 concerning restrictive measures in response to the recognition of the non-government controlled areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and the ordering of Russian armed forces into those areas | 8 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/625 of 13 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/626 of 13 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2022/263 concerning restrictive measures in response to the recognition of the non-government controlled areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and the ordering of Russian armed forces into those areas

3

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/627 of 13 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

6

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/628 of 13 April 2022 amending Decision (CFSP) 2022/266 concerning restrictive measures in response to the recognition of the non-government controlled areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and the ordering of Russian armed forces into those areas

8

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
                      STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS
                                    PER SHARE
                 (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED                      NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                      OCTOBER 31,                            OCTOBER 31,
                                                            -------------------------------        -------------------------------
                                                               1999                1998               1999                1998
                                                            -----------         -----------        -----------         -----------
<S>                                                         <C>                 <C>                <C>                 <C>
COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS
  PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income (loss)                                           $    (1,070)        $       988        $    (4,404)        $     3,519
                                                            -----------         -----------        -----------         -----------
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding          9,551,000           9,516,000          9,550,000           9,486,000

Earnings per common share                                   $     (0.11)        $      0.10        $     (0.46)        $      0.37
                                                            ===========         ===========        ===========         ===========

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
  ASSUMING DILUTION:

Net income (loss)                                           $    (1,070)        $       988        $    (4,404)        $     3,519
                                                            -----------         -----------        -----------         -----------

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding          9,551,000           9,516,000          9,550,000           9,486,000

Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
   based on the treasury stock method, using
   the average market price                                          --              94,000                 --             196,000
                                                            -----------         -----------        -----------         -----------

Common shares outstanding assuming dilution                   9,551,000           9,610,000          9,550,000           9,682,000
                                                            ===========         ===========        ===========         ===========
Earnings per common share assuming dilution                 $     (0.11)        $      0.10        $     (0.46)        $      0.36
                                                            ===========         ===========        ===========         ===========
</TABLE>
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, our financial condition and result of operations. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                         |                                                                    |                                       |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                         | WORLDS.COM,                INC.(Registrant)                        |
|                                         |                                                                    |                                       |
| Date: March                4, 2008 | By:                                                      | /s/ Thomas                Kidrin |
|                                         | Thomas                KidrinChief                Executive Officer |