alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 67 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                        Calendar No. 53
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 67

To designate the headquarters building of the Department of Housing and 
Urban Development in Washington, District of Columbia, as the ``Robert 
                     C. Weaver Federal Building''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

    Mr. Moynihan (for himself, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Robb, Mr. 
  Schumer, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Graham, Mr. Sarbanes, Mrs. Boxer, and Mr. 
   Hollings) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

                             March 17, 1999

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To designate the headquarters building of the Department of Housing and 
Urban Development in Washington, District of Columbia, as the ``Robert 
                     C. Weaver Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT C. WEAVER FEDERAL BUILDING.

    In honor of the first Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 
the headquarters building of the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development located at 451 Seventh Street, SW., in Washington, District 
of Columbia, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert C. Weaver 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert C. Weaver Federal 
Building''.
                                     





                                                        Calendar No. 53

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 67

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the headquarters building of the Department of Housing and 
Urban Development in Washington, District of Columbia, as the ``Robert 
                     C. Weaver Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 17, 1999

                       Reported without amendment`
3rd Amend. to the 3rd Amended & Restated Non-Emp. Director Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.5 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE 

GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. 

THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED 

2000 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN 

This Third Amendment to the Global Payments Inc. Third Amended and Restated 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the
“Director Plan”), is hereby adopted as of 30th day of September, 2010, by the Board of Directors of Global Payments Inc. (the “Company”). 

WHEREAS, the Company adopted the Director Plan for the purposes set forth therein; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 of the Director Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company has the right to amend the Director Plan
with respect to certain matters; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has approved and authorized this Amendment to the
Director Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Director Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof, in the following
particulars: 
 By deleting the first paragraph of Section 5(a) in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 “(a) Grant. Each person who becomes a Non-Employee Director shall be granted on the date that he or she first
becomes a Non-Employee Director an option to purchase that number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock having a value of $45,000 pursuant to the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of the grant (utilizing the same assumptions as
the Company utilizes for its proxy disclosure), multiplied by a fraction, the numerator or which is the number of full months before the next regularly scheduled annual shareholders meeting of the Company, and the denominator of which is 12. In
addition, as of the day following each annual meeting of the Company’s public shareholders, each Non-Employee Director serving as such on that date shall be granted an option to purchase that number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock
having a value of $45,000 pursuant to the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of the grant (utilizing the same assumptions as the Company utilizes for its proxy disclosure). Each such day that options are to be granted under the Plan is
referred to hereinafter as a “Grant Date.” ” 
 All other provisions of the Director Plan shall remain the same.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Global Payments Inc., by a duly authorized officer, has executed this Amendment to the Director Plan, as
of the 30th day of September, 2010. 
  

			
	GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Suellyn P. Tornay
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10400]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 
Senate will proceed to a period of morning business, with Senators 
permitted to speak therein for up to 10 minutes each.
  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. REED. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  Mr. REED. I ask unanimous consent that I be allowed to speak as in 
morning business.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.

                          ____________________
```
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned officer of Tix Corporation (the “Company”) hereby
certifies:





(i)
            The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
      September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





(ii)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the periods covered in the
Report.





DATE:
        November 9, 2009
              /s/
      MITCH FRANCISMitch
      Francis,Chief
      Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Tix Corporation and will be retained by Tix Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The foregoing certification is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to the Form
10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form
10-Q.
---

Exhibit 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Forum National Investments
  Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2004
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: December 22, 2006 | By                                                        | /s/
      *Daniel Clozza*
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------
|                         | Daniel Clozza, Chief Executive Officer
      and Director



---
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 2

(Mark One)

|x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarter ended: June 30, 2008

or



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from  to

Commission
File Number: 0-26004

DIVERSIFIED FUTURES TRUST I

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 13-3780260                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|                                                               | 
|900 King Street, Suite 100, Rye Brook, New York                |  | 10573                               
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                          

(914) 307-7000

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.    Yes  x    No   ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



|                           |  |                             
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Large accelerated filer   ̈ |  | Accelerated filer   ̈        
|Non-accelerated filer  x   |  | Smaller Reporting Company   ̈

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).    Yes   ̈    No  x









---

DIVERSIFIED FUTURES TRUST I





Explanatory Note

The Form 10-Q/A is being filed solely to correct the omission of certain language required under
the Certification in the Diversified Futures Trust Is Form 10-Q previously filed on August 12, 2008 and amended on February 2, 2009, which are restated in their entirety herewith. Except for the foregoing amended information, no
other changes have been made to the Form 10-Q filed on August 12, 2008 and amended on February 2, 2009 by this amendment.



2
Bruce:

It is OK to use a colorimetric endpoint determination in place of a pH meter for OTM-028. The intent of the

method was to neutralize the acids but not add more am monium hydroxide that was necessary for neutrality. The

use of phenolphthalein or other indicator of reaching a pH of 7.0 achieves th at goal. I don't know how much
residue there may be in two or three drops of phenolphthalein but even at 5mg/100ml three drops would not be
weighable with a 4 place balance.

_________________________________ Ron Myers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policy and Programs Division Monitoring Policy Group, D243-05
RTP NC 27711

Tel. 919.541.5407
Fax 919.541.1039 E-mail myers.ron@epa.gov

Bruce,

First to clarify, you are talking about OTM-028 rather than CTM-028, right (your third paragraph had me conf used at first)?

I have cc:ed Ron Myers and Jason DeWees who are much more kno wledgeable on OTM-028 than me.

Hopefully, they will have a quick answer for you,

Robin



### Robin, From: Robin Segall/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "J. Bruce Nemet" <Resolute1@charterinternet.com>

Cc: Ron Myers/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jason Dewees/RTP/USEPA/ US@EPA

Date: 02/11/2010 12:40 PM

Subject: Re: OTM-028 alternative procedure for pH determinat ion

From: "J. Bruce Nemet" <Resolute1@charterinternet.com>

To: Robin Segall/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/10/2010 09:16 AM

Subject: OTM-028 alternative procedure for pH determination Page 1 of 2

8/26/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4C765394Do

...I own and operate an air quality testing laboratory providing analytical se rvices under the guidelines of

CAA. I also, incidentally, serve as our Quality Assurance office r. We are currently utilizing several analytical and/or preparatory procedures that are either in conflict or not specifially addressed in the respective EPA methods.

In each case I prefer the use of the alternative procedures to thos e specified in their respective methods because of an increased accuracy or reliability and not as a cost- savings means. (The following method falls under your domain I believe.) Can you provide me with some feedback on approval (or disapproval) of the following procedure.

EPA Conditional Test Method 028 (CTM-028) specifically requires the use of a pH meter to titrate resuspended aqueous samples to a pH 7 (sec. 11.2.2.4). Although our lab is equi pped with a pH meter I prefer the analyst to use a colorimetric endpoint determination (ie. , phenolphthalein) in place of the meter. It is much more reliable and doesn't require calibration. A meter, although calibrated, may have "response drift" since its last calibration - even in the course of a few hours! Phenolphthalein is consistently reliable and never needs calibration. I would like approval from the EPA for its use in place of a meter for this specific procedure.

Thank you. I can also be contacted by phone at (919) 774-5557.

Bruce Nemet QA Officer Resolution Analytics, Inc. Page 2 of 2

8/26/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4C765394Do

...
#### Otto, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *L. E. Vaudreuil*of Kenosha.

For tfie respondent Industrial Commission: *John E. Martin,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# BART Screening Analysis Results DV Frequency

SW Domain 1995 1996 2001 1995 1996 2001 (Num Values >.5 DV)(Num Values >.5 DV)(Num Values >.5 DV)Max DV ChangeMax DV ChangeMax DV Change P4 Production Bridger Wilderness 0 0 0 0.143 0.381 0.388 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 0 0 0 0.081 0.129 0.094 Pacificorp - Bridger Bridger Wilderness 55 21 42 9.717 8.6664.617 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 25 15 23 3.3373.7644.327 Pacificorp - Naughton Bridger Wilderness 105 109 128 5.984 6.185 7.331 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 48 43 81 3.305 5.2534.789 FMC - Granger Bridger Wilderness 3 13 7 0.862 1.719 1.090 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 0 2 0 0.260 1.140 0.272 FMC - Green River Bridger Wilderness 20 24 38 2.0632.788 2.214 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 5 8 11 1.003 1.811 1.235 General Chemical Bridger Wilderness 11 18 27 1.471 2.369 1.757 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 4 5 6 0.702 1.658 1.077 OCI - Wyoming Bridger Wilderness 0 0 0 0.097 0.149 0.127 Fitzpatrick Wilderness 0 0 0 0.019 0.056 0.028



### NE Domain 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 (Num Values >.5 DV)(Num Values >.5 DV)(Num Values >.5 DV)Max DV ChangeMax DV ChangeMax DV Change Basin Electric - LRS Bad Lands 81 57 62 5.5035.879 5.441 Wind Cave 73 58 36 6.273 7.709 8.518 Black Hills - Neil Simpson 1 Bad Lands 0 0 0 0.207 0.346 0.374 Wind Cave 0 0 1 0.234 0.425 0.700 Pacificorp - Dave Johnston Bad Lands 88 65 79 4.2994.051 3.482 Wind Cave 91 69 77 4.46 4.678 4.326 Pacificorp - Wyodak Bad Lands 20 23 29 1.155 2.16 2.484 Wind Cave 30 28 37 1.671 2.49 3.685 Sinclair - Casper Refinery Bad Lands 0 0 0 0.075 0.089 0.091 Wind Cave 0 0 0 0.112 0.119 0.106 Sinclair - Sinclair Refinery Bad Lands 0 0 0 0.196 0.166 0.132 Wind Cave 0 0 0 0.303 0.189 0.247



### SE Domain 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 (Num Values >.5 DV)(Num Values >.5 DV)(Num Values >.5 DV)Max DV ChangeMax DV ChangeMax DV Change Sinclair - Sinclair Refinery Rocky Mountain NP 0 0 0 0.242 0.282 0.144 Rawah Wilderness 0 0 0 0.267 0.32 0.151 Mt. Zirkel Wilderness 0 0 0 0.425 0.213 0.177 Dyno-Nobel Rocky Mountain NP 1 3 1 0.819 0.883 0.671 Rawah Wilderness 1 1 0 0.696 0.552 0.134 Mt. Zirkel Wilderness 0 0 0 0.261 0.282 0.271
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Samuel Day, Appellant.

Nuisance: judgment: affirmance.

*Appeal from Polh District Court.*— Hon. C. P. Holmes, Judge.

Tuesday, February 9, 1892.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of keeping a saloon nuisance, and *appeals.*

Affirmed.

Kinne, J.

This appeal is presented upon a transcript of the information and record entry of a trial by jury, and judgment. The transcript does not contain the evidence, or the instructions of the court to the jury. We have examined the record and discover no error therein. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
THEA~TORNEYGENERAII~ 

OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN. 'l-XCXAS 78711 

January 17, 1974 

The Honorable Fred P. Holub Opinion No. H- 2,16 

County Attorney 

Matagorda County Re: Circumstances under 

Bay City, Texas 77414 which persons under 16 

years of age may marry, 

pear Mr. Holub: if at all 

You have requested our opinion “as to whether or not under the new 

Family Code a person under the age of sixteen (16) years can obtain a 

marriage license from the County Clerk. ” 

In our opinion the Family Code allows a person under ,16 years of 

age to obtain a marriage License and to marry only if a district judge has 

ordered a waiver of the age requirement (16 years of age) “for good cause 

shown. ‘I Section 1. 51(c), infra. 

The Legislature, 1973, amended provisions of the Family Code with 

respect to marriage licenses (Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., ch. 577, p. 1596). 

Amended 6 1.07 provides in part: 

“(a) The county clerk may not issue a license to the 

applicants if: 

. . . . 

“(3) either applicant is under 16 years of age 

and the waiver of age requirements has not been 

ordered under the provisions of Section 1.51(c) of 

this code; . . . .” 

Section 1. 51 refers to “Age Requirements. ” Subsection (a) provides: 

“A person under 16 years of age may not marry. ” However, subsection (c) 

provides: 

‘p. 1008 
The Honorable Fred P. Holub, page 2 (H-216) 

“Upon petition in a district court in the name of 

the person seeking the waiver, the court may order 

the waiver of the age requirement prescribed in 

Subsection (a) for good cause shown. ” 

Section 2.41 provides that the marriage of persons under .16’ years 

of age is voidable, “unless a waiver of the age,requirement has been ordered. ” 

It is therefore plain that a district judge, upon petition and a showing 

of good cause, and only then, may order the waiver of the 16 year age 

requirement and that, with such an order, a person under the age of 16 years 

of age may obtain a marriage license from the county clerk in the state of 

Texas. 

SUMMARY 

Only upoq waiver of the age requirement by a 

district court upon proper petitions and proof of good 

cause. may a person under the age of 16 obtain a 

marriage license in the state of Texas. 

Yours very truly, 

u Attorney General of Texas 

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

p. 1009
#### SEVER & WILD v. J. M. McLAUGHLIN.

*Practice*— Appeal *Bond*— Time *of Filing.*

All appeals will be dismissed on motion of the adverse counsel when the appeal bond is not filed within ten days from the rendition of the judgment appealed from, unless there is a waiver on the record or in. writing.

*(Wade*v. *City of New*Berne, 72 IST. 0., 498, cited and approved )

Civil Action tried at Spring Term, 1879, of Mecklen-burg Superior Court, before Kerr, *J.*

Verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and the defendant appealed.

*Mr. A. Burwell,*for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Wilson & Son,*for defendant.

Asi-ie, J.

Upon the hearing in this court, the plaintiffs’ counsel moved to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that *333the appeal bond was not filed within the time required by law.

As appears from the record the judgment was rendered on the 3rd day of March, 1879, and the appeal prayed for and granted. The appeal bond bears date March the 20th, 1879, and there is an endorsement on the back of the bond by the clerk of the court that the bond was filed on the 29th day of April, 1879. Taking either date as the time of filing the bond, it was not done within ten days- from the rendition of the judgment appealed from, as required by law, and it does not appear from the record that there was any agreement between the counsel, waiving the time of complying with the rule. *Wade*v. *City of New Berne,*72 N. C., 498.

This court has established the rule that all appeals will be dismissed, on motion of the adverse counsel, when the appeal bond is not filed within the ten days from the rendition of the judgment, unless there is a waiver on the record or in writing. This appeal must therefore be dismissed. Let this be certified.

Per Curiam. Appeal dismissed.

Same point decided in *Wadsworth*v. *Carroll*from Craven, (case not reported in full) at January Term, 1879, citing and approving *Wade*v. *City of New Berne,*72 N. C., 498, as follows:

Dillard, J.

This was an action for breach of covenant of seizin, and the plaintiff by a motion in the cause sought an injunction to the sale of the premises advertised under a mortgage, and the plaintiff being dissatisfied with the order of the judge below appeals to this , court. The defendant moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that there is no case of appeal, and that the appeal bond filed was not filed within the time prescribed by law, and the plaintiff moved for a writ of *certiorari*to bring up the appeal. .

*334On looking into the record, we find the appeal was taken and notice given on the 10th of September, 1878, and an appeal bond was executed and filed on the 1st of October, and there is no case of appeal. In *Wade*v. *City of New Berne,*72 N. C., 498, this court decided that if an appeal bond is not given within ten day from the rendition of the judgment appealed from, the appeal -will be dismissed, and we adhere to that rule. The appeal is dismissed, but with leave to plaintiff to move for a *certiorari,*on laying proper ground therefor to bring up the case for review.

Per Curiam. Appeal dismissed.