alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016329EN.01000401.xml

| 7.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/4

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2016/C 329/04)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oxalic acid | India
  The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 325/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of oxalic acid originating in India and the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 106, 18.4.2012, p. 1). | 19.4.2017 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Oxalic acid

India

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 325/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of oxalic acid originating in India and the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 106, 18.4.2012, p. 1).

19.4.2017

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
No. 12-15-00157-CR

In the Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Judicial District at Tyler, Texas

Stanford Jones, Appellant
V. State of Texas, Appellee

On Appeal From Cause No. 2013-0744 in the 217th Judicial District Court of Angelina County, Texas

State’s Second Motion for Extension (Unopposed)

To the Honorable Justices of this Court: Appellee, State of Texas, moves for a 10-day extension of time to file its brief.
I. Under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the general deadline to file an appellee’s brief is 30 days after the date the appellant’s brief was filed. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(b). Appellant’s Brief was filed on October 15, 2015, giving the State until Monday November 16, 2015 to file its brief. ACCEPTED 12-15-00157-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 12/17/2015 10:22:50 AM

Pam Estes CLERKThis Court granted the State a 30-day extension of time in which to file its

brief on November 18, 2015 giving the State until T hursday December 17, 2015 to file its brief. The State of Texas now requests a 10-day extension of time in which to file its brief.
II. Good cause exists for allowing the State additional time to file its brief for the following reasons: 1. Counsel for the State is working on another brie f during this time period, Jenkins v. State 12-15-00039-CR. 2. Counsel for the State has just returned to work on December 11, 2015 following a medical emergency that occurre d on November 2,
2015. 3. Counsel for the State is lead counsel on five fe lony sentencing’s, one suppression hearing, and two non- jury trials occurring between December 14-21, 2015. This is in addition to the normal felony case load. 4. Counsel for the Appellant is unopposed to this m otion,
III.From the above-listed reasons, the State has demon strated that good

cause for the failure to be able to submit its brie f by the Court’s deadline. This is the State’s first motion for extension, and it is not brought for purposes of delay or harassment, but to see that ju stice is done. Wherefore, Appellee State of Texas prays that the C ourt grant its requested 10-day extension to file its State’s Brie f in this matter.

Respectfully Submitted, /s/April Ayers-Perez Assistant District Attorney Angelina County D.A.’s Office P.O. Box 908 Lufkin, Texas 75902 (936) 632-5090 phone (936) 637-2818 fax State Bar No. 24090975 aperez@angelinacounty.net Attorney for Appellee State of TexasCertificate of Service

I do certify that on December 17, 2015 a true and correct copy of the above document has been served electronically to Jo hn Reeves, 1007 Grant Ave., Lufkin, Texas, 75901, attorney for Appe llant, Stanford Jones, through efile.txcourts.gov. /s/April Ayers-Perez

Certificate of Conference I certify that on December 16, 2015, I conferred w ith John Reeves by telephone about this motion, and certify that he wa s unopposed to a 10-day extension. /s/April Ayers-Perez
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 627 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 627

            To terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 1999

Mr. Hutchinson (for himself and Mr. Brownback, Mr. Burns, Mr. Smith of 
New Hampshire Mr. Coverdell, Mr. McCain, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. 
Bunning, Mr. Allard, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Gorton, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Grams, Mr. 
Bond, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Helms, Mr. Craig, and Mr. Crapo) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Code Termination Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986.

    (a) In General.--No tax shall be imposed by the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986--
            (1) for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2003, 
        and
            (2) in the case of any tax not imposed on the basis of a 
        taxable year, on any taxable event or for any period after 
        December 31, 2003.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to taxes imposed 
by--
            (1) chapter 2 of such Code (relating to tax on self-
        employment income),
            (2) chapter 21 of such Code (relating to Federal Insurance 
        Contributions Act), and
            (3) chapter 22 of such Code (relating to Railroad 
        Retirement Tax Act).

SEC. 3. NEW FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM.

    (a) Structure.--The Congress hereby declares that any new Federal 
tax system should be a simple and fair system that--
            (1) applies a low rate to all Americans,
            (2) provides tax relief for working Americans,
            (3) protects the rights of taxpayers and reduces tax 
        collection abuses,
            (4) eliminates the bias against savings and investment,
            (5) promotes economic growth and job creation, and
            (6) does not penalize marriage or families.
    (b) Timing of Implementation.--In order to ensure an easy 
transition and effective implementation, the Congress hereby declares 
that any new Federal tax system should be approved by Congress in its 
final form not later than July 4, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
# Requests Report FY22 Quarter 3
WORKER SAFETY 

IS YOUR BUSINESS 

KEEP DRIVERS SAFE
Texting while driving dramatically 

increases the risk of a motor vehicle 

injury or fatality. Employers need to 

make it clear to all workers that their 

company doesn’t require or condone 

texting while driving. It’s literally a 

matter of life and death.

How businesses can get started:

Strong policies 

 Have a strong policy that prohibits the use of 

portable electronic devices while driving. 

 Establish work procedures and rules that do not 

make it necessary to text while driving. 

 Make safe driving an integral part of your 

business culture.

Training

 Provide continuous driver safety training 

and communication. 

 Train workers on driving distractions and to not 

solely rely on navigation and other advanced 

technology systems.

Photo: iStock
 Instruct drivers to take extra precautions during 

inclement weather.

 Ensure drivers know procedures, times and 

places for drivers to use phones and other 

technologies for communicating with managers, 

customers and others.

Vehicle and driver safety

 Review and consider the safety features of all 

vehicles used, including late model vehicle 

safety systems (e.g., collision warning, driving 

control assistance).

 Check the driving records of all employees who 

drive for work purposes.

 Ensure vehicles are safe and properly maintained.

 Encourage workers to focus on the road, avoid 

electronic distractions, slow down in work zones 

and not drive if fatigued. 

Safety at work is no accident

 Build a workplace culture of safety through 

explicit policies and sound practices.

 Incorporate safe communications practices into 

work orientation and training.
Benefits to your business

 Keep your employees safe

 Reduce the costs of crashes and incidents

 Reduce stress and improve employee morale

 Minimal business interruptions

How OSHA can help

OSHA’s On-Site consultation program can help 

small- and medium-size businesses keep workers 

safe by providing:

 No-cost and confidential occupational safety 

and health services

 Assistance with identifying workplace hazards

 Advice on compliance with OSHA standards

 Assistance with safety and health programs

To learn more, visit www.osha.gov or call 

1-800-321-OSHA (6742), TTY 1-877-889-5627.

When you commit to keeping your 

employees safe behind the wheel, you 

are also ensuring the safety of coworkers, 

pedestrians and other road users.

OSHA 3416-09R 2021

This document does not have the force and effect of law and is not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is 

intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.
1

Ogulei, David

From: Damico, Genevieve

Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:06 AM

To: Woolums, Jane; Ogulei, David

Subject: FW: Follow-up meeting per your request in your December 19 letter

Feb 11th?

From: Harris, Doug [mailto:doug.harris@veolia.com]  

Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:48 AM

To: Damico, Genevieve

Subject: Re: Follow‐up meeting per your request in your December 19 letter

Genevieve, 

Each of your three proposed dates are workable for us. Do you just want to pick the morning of the 11th? Let 

me know? 

On 8 January 2015 at 10:19, Damico, Genevieve <damico.genevieve@epa.gov> wrote: 

Doug, 

 

I hope you are keeping warm. 

 

I wanted to connect with you on your request for a meeting included in the cover letter to your comments on 

the draft Title V renewal permit so it doesn’t get lost in the hustle and bustle. We are currently busily working 

through the various comments we received but our calendars should free up some in early February. Could we 

plan to meet in the morning of February 10, 11, or 12? 

-- 

Doug Harris

General Manager

Veolia ES Technical Solutions

7 Mobile Avenue

Sauget, IL 62201

Office 618-271-2804 

Cell 618-616-7420

Fax 618-271-2128
2

Email: doug.harris@veolia.com

SERVICE FIRST. SAFETY ALWAYS.

This e-mail message from Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. is for the sole use of 

the intended recipient and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 

review, use disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 

communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and 

delete same from all computers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
"THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JANUARY 24, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND APRIL 26,
1998 AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THIRTY-NINE
WEEKS ENDED JANUARY 24, 1999 AND JANUARY 25, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000926295
<NAME> BOSTON RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-24-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                       1,715,923
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    231,672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,082,423
<PP&E>                                       5,844,953
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,463,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,785,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          910,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,242
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,368,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,785,939
<SALES>                                      9,237,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,241,548
<CGS>                                        1,934,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,851,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             243,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                201,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   201,604
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03



</TABLE>
D1266 

Thursday, November 13, 2008 

Daily Digest 

Senate 

Chamber Action 

Senate met at 3:00:15 p.m. in pro forma session, 

and recessed at 3:00:41 p.m. until 12 noon, on Monday, November 17, 2008. 

Committee Meetings 

(Committees not listed did not meet) 

EMERGENCY ECONOMIC STABILIZATION 

ACT 

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: 

Committee concluded a hearing to examine the 

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, focusing on 

reviewing financial institution use of funding under 

the Capital Purchase Program, after receiving testimony from Martin D. Eakes, Center for Responsible 

Lending, Durham, North Carolina; Barry L. Zubrow, 

JPMorgan Chase and Company, Far Hills, New Jersey; Gregory K. Palm, The Goldman Sachs Group, 

Inc., New York, New York; Susan M. Wachter, 

University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School, 

Philadelphia; Anne Finucane, Bank of America, Lincoln, Massachusetts; Jon Campbell, Wells Fargo and 

Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Nancy 

Zirkin, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, 

h 

Washington, D.C. 

House of Representatives 

Chamber Action 

The House was not in session today. The House 

is scheduled to meet at 11 a.m. on Saturday, January 

3, 2009, pursuant to the provisions of H. Con. Res. 

440. 

Committee Meetings 

TREATMENTS FOR AN AILING ECONOMY 

Committee on Energy and Commerce: Subcommittee on 

Health held a hearing entitled ‘‘Treatments for an 

Ailing Economy: Protecting Health Care Coverage 

and Investing in Biomedical Research.’’ Testimony 

was heard from Governor Janet Napolitano, State of 

Arizona; Raynard S. Kington, M.D., Acting Director, NIH, Department of Heath and Human Services; and public witnesses. 

PREVENTING HOME MORTGAGE 

FORECLOSURE 

Committee on Financial Services: On November 12, the 

Committee held a hearing entitled ‘‘Private Sector 

Cooperation with Mortgage Modifications—Ensuring 

That Investors, Services and Lenders Provide Real 

Help for Troubled Homeowners.’’ Testimony was 

heard from Benjamin Allensworth, Senior Legal 

Counsel, Managed Fund Association; Thomas 

Deutsch, Deputy Executive Director, American 

Securitization Forum; Michael Gross, Managing Director, Loan Administration Loss Mitigation, Bank of 

America; and Molly Sheehan, Senior Vice President, 

Home Lending Division, JP Morgan Chase. 

HEDGE FUNDS AND THE FINANCIAL 

MARKET 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: Held a 

hearing on Hedge Funds and the Financial Market. 

Testimony was heard from David Ruder, former 

Chairman, SEC; and public witnesses. 

f 

CONGRESSIONAL PROGRAM AHEAD 

Week of November 17 through 22, 2008 

Senate Chamber 

To be announced. 

Senate Committees 

(Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated) 

To be announced. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with DIGEST
----

(2004/C 78 E/0328)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3775/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Ancona municipality

In response to my previous question (E-1062/03 (1)) asking whether the Ancona municipality had submitted projects and obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission stated on 8 May 2003 that Ancona had not applied for such funding.

Will the Commission state, again in respect of centrally managed funds, whether any projects were submitted subsequently and, if so, what decision has been taken on them?

----

(1)OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**


**Pursuant
      to 18 United States Code Section 1350**








The
      undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2006 of Nanobac Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated (the
      "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                John D StantonJohn
                  D Stanton
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
                November
                  6, 2006





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nanobac Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated and will be retained by it and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018345EN.01001101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 345/11 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9079 — Advent International Corporation/KN Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 345/09)

1.

On 20 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018345EN.01001101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Advent International Corporation (‘AIC’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | KN Network Services Holdings Limited (‘KN’, Ireland). |

AIC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of KN.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for AIC: private equity investor which sponsors funds that invest globally,

—   for KN: provision of services to the telecommunication, media installations, transport infrastructure and power sectors, in Ireland and in the United Kingdom.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018345EN.01001101-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9079 — Advent International Corporation/KN Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018345EN.01001101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018345EN.01001101-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

A-Vet Roofing & Construction, LLC 

Under Contract No. N40085-16-C-7708 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 62318 

Mr. Bobby L. Gregory 

President 

Craig D. Jens en, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Colleen M. Shook, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Board docketed this appeal on December 26, 2019. By motion received 

January 14, 2020, prior to filing its complaint, appellant requested to withdraw the appeal. 

The government does not object. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed from the Board's 

docket without prejudice. See TTF, L.L.C., ASBCA No. 58494, 13 BCA ,r 35,343 

at 173,464. 

Dated: January 28, 2020 

J\.dmi 1strative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62318, Appeal of A-Vet Roofing & 

Construction, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

PAULLAK. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals