alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Christopher C. Siffert, Vice President & Corporate Controller of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Christopher C. Siffert  
 21
Canyon Copper Corp.: Exhibit 10.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






PROMISSORY NOTE 

	EXECUTED BY: 	CANYON COPPER CORP. 
	  	(the "Borrower") 
	 	 
	IN FAVOUR OF: 	ANTHONY R. HARVEY 
	  	(the "Lender") 
	 	 
	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: 	$50,000 (USD) 
	 	 
	DATE OF EXECUTION: 	October 7, 2010 
	 	 
	PLACE OF EXECUTION: 	Vancouver, British Columbia
  


FOR VALUE RECEIVED the Borrower hereby promises to pay
to or to the order of the Lender on April 1, 2012, the principal sum of $50,000
(USD), together with interest thereon at the rate of 15% per annum, calculated
and compounded annually, both before and after maturity from the date hereof.


The Borrower waives presentment, demand, notice, protest and
notice of dishonour and all other demands and notices in connection with the
delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this Promissory
Note. 

The Borrower agrees this Promissory Note may be negotiated,
assigned, discounted, or pledged by the Lender and in every case payment will be
made to the holder of this Promissory Note instead of the Lender upon notice
being given by the holder to the undersigned, and no holder of this Promissory
Note will be affected by the state of accounts between the undersigned and the
Lender or by any equities existing between the undersigned and the Lender and
will be deemed to be a holder in due course and for the value of the Promissory
Note held by him. 

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia this 7th day of
October, 2010. 

CANYON COPPER CORP. 
by its authorized signatory:


/s/ Kurt Bordian 
________________________________

KURT BORDIAN
열 스트레스로부터 

근로자들을 보호

온열 질환

열에 노출되면 질병과 사망에 이를 수 있습니다. 가장 

심각한 온열 질환은 열사병입니다. 열탈진, 열경련, 

땀띠와 같은 다른 열질환들도 피해야 합니다. 온도가 

높고 작업에 육체적인 작업이 수반될 때 언제든지 취할 

수 있는 예방 조치가 있습니다.

온열 질환의 위험 인자

• 고온 및 습도, 태양에 직접적인 노출, 바람 부재

• 중노동

• 더운 작업장에 최근 노출이 없음

• 낮은 액체 섭취량

• 방수복

열탈진 증상

• 두통, 어지러움, 또는 실신

• 연약함과 젖은 피부

• 과민성 또는 혼란

• 갈증, 메스꺼움, 또는 구토

열사병 증상

• 혼란스럽거나, 명확하게 생각할 수 없거나, 기절하거나, 

쓰러지거나, 발작 증상

• 땀 멈춤

온열 질환 예방 방법

• 온열 질환 예방 프로그램 수립.

• 열 스트레스를 유발하는 위험에 대한 

교육과 예방 방법 제공.

• 작업장에서 가까운 작업자에게 시원한 

물을 충분히 제공. 시간당 최소 1 파인트의 

물이 필요합니다. 

• 작업 일정을 수정하고 그늘진 곳이나 

에어컨이 설치된 곳에서 물을 마시는 

휴식을 마련합니다.

QUICK

CARDTM
• 일의 양을 점진적으로 늘리고 더위에 익숙하지 않은 

작업자나 작업을 잠시 멈춘 작업자에게는 더위에 

적응하기 위해 더 많은 휴식을 제공합니다.

• 열 스트레스 위험이 있는 작업자를 보호하고 상태를 

모니터링할 책임자를 지정합니다. 

• 냉각 기능을 제공하는 보호복을 고려합니다.

근로자들을 보호하는 방법

• 온열 질환의 징후/증상을 알고, 자신을 

모니터링하며, 동료에게 도움을 

요청합니다.

• 직사광선 및 기타 열원을 차단합니다.

• 수분을 많이 섭취하고, 목이 마르기 전에 

물을 마십니다. 15분 마다 물을 마시세요.

• 알코올이나 카페인이 함유된 음료 

섭취는 피하세요.

• 가볍고, 밝은 색상의 헐렁한 옷을 입으세요.

근로자가 더위로 아플 때 대응 방법

• 관리자에게 도움을 요청하세요. 관리자 부재 경우 911에 

전화하세요.

• 도움이 도착할 때까지 누군가 근로자와 함께 있도록 

하세요.

• 근로자를 더 시원한 곳으로 이동시킵니다.

• 겉 옷을 벗깁니다.

• 근로자에게 부채질을 하고 물을 분무합니다. 얼음(얼음 

봉지 또는 얼음 수건)을 대줍니다.

• 마실 수 있는 경우 시원한 식수를 제공합니다.

작업자가 주의를 기울이지 않거나 혼란스러운 경우 

열사병일 수 있습니다. 즉시 911에 전화하고 가능한 

빨리 얼음을 댑니다.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)

OSHA 4361-08 2023 | Korean

산업안전

보건청

더 많은 정보는 여기에서:

QUICK

CARDTM
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 88853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. FD 36778]


East Tennessee Railway, L.P.--Lease and Operation Exemption--CSX 
Transportation, Inc.

    East Tennessee Railway, L.P. (ETRY), a Class III rail carrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to amend its 
lease with CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) for a 4.05-mile rail line 
that extends from milepost ZJ 0.05 to milepost ZJ 4.10 near Johnson 
City, Tenn., and two short spurs, known as Johnson City Lead and 
Carnegie Spur, in Washington County, Tenn. (the Line). ETRY states that 
it first received authority to lease and operate the Line in 2003,\1\ 
and it is currently the operator of the Line. According to ETRY, the 
amended lease will extend the term of the current lease an additional 
six years, through September 30, 2030, as well as make other minor 
changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See East Tenn. Ry.--Lease & Operation Exemption--CSX 
Transp., Inc., FD 34404 (STB served Sept. 26, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ETRY certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of 
the proposed transaction will not result in ETRY's becoming a Class I 
or Class II rail carrier and will not exceed $5 million. ETRY also 
certifies that the amended lease does not include an interchange 
commitment.
    The transaction may be consummated on or after November 24, 2024, 
the effective date of the exemption (30 days after the verified notice 
of exemption was filed). If the verified notice contains false or 
misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
effectiveness of the exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed by 
November 15, 2024 (at least seven days before the exemption becomes 
effective).
    All pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD 36778, must be filed with 
the Surface Transportation Board either via e-filing or in writing 
addressed to 395 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on ETRY's representative, Justin 
J. Marks, Clark Hill PLC, 1001 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 1300 South, 
Washington, DC 20004.
    According to ETRY, this action is categorically excluded from 
environmental review under 49 CFR 1105.6(c) and from historic 
preservation reporting requirements under 49 CFR 1105.8(b).
    Board decisions and notices are available at www.stb.gov.

    Decided: November 5, 2024.

    By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024-26052 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 166 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10517]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Byrd).
  The legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                 Washington, DC, October 16, 2008.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, section 3, of the Standing 
     Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable Jack 
     Reed, a Senator from the State of Rhode Island, to perform 
     the duties of the Chair.
                                                   Robert C. Byrd,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. REED thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro tempore.

                          ____________________
```
UNITED STATES
             SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                   Washington, D.C. 20549
                          FORM 10-Q/A-1
                              
   Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                              
   For the quarterly period ended            April 30, 1997
                              
             Commission File Number     1-13424
                              
              Data Systems Network Corporation

 
Michigan                                                   38-2649874

(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)

34705 W. 12 Mile Rd., Suite 300                             48331
Farmington Hills, Michigan
(Address of principal executive offices)                   (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(248) 489-8700

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant(1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

YES [X]     NO [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and 
reports required to be filed by Section 12,13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a
plan confirmed by a court.

YES [X]    NO [ ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practical date:
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value - 4,596,206 shares as of April 30, 1997.
<PAGE>

Item 2.  Changes in Securities

  (c)  On January 31, 1997, NBD Bank, N.A. exercised warrants to purchase 85,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock for cash consideration totalling 
510.  Such warrants were issued pursuant to the Company's Third Amended Plan 
of Reorganization in June 1992.  The sale of the shares pursuant to the 
exercise of such warrants was exempt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 1145.



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the drequirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the 
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                     Data Systems Network Corporation

August 18, 1997                      Philip M. Goy
Date                                 Philip M. Goy
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                     (principal financial officer)

August 18,1997                       Michael W. Grieves
Date                                 Michael W. Grieves
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
                                     (duly authorized officer)
Order entered July 10, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00297
- CR KIRK STEVEN JACKSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. F13
- 70153
- Y



### O RDER
T he Court GRANTS the State’s July 9, 2015 amended motion for extension of time to
file the State’s brief

. We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### Jonathan Stephenson *v*. Laban Jones.

From Cumberland.

If no error is assigned in the charge of the Judge, and none appears upon the record, the judgment of the Superior Courtis of course affirmed.

This cause was bought op to this Court by certiorari, awarded on a rule made absolute, without notice to the Defendant, the Plaintiff swearing that be prayed an appeal to this Court, but that the Superior Court adjourned before he could get his sureties to the Court-House, for the purpose of giving bond. The affidavit set forth no special cause for which the appeal was prayed, and the record, which was in the usual form, stated, that after a verdict for the Defendant, before DowNexu, Judge, the Plaintiff obtained a rule for a new trial ec on the ground that the verdict \yas against law and evidence,” which rule was discharged.

*Get ston,*for th? Plaintiff.

*16Per cuRXAM.

From an inspection of the record in this case, nothing appears shewing that judgment was improperly rendered against the Plaintiff in the Superior court. That Judgment must therefore be affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
                      STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS
                                    PER SHARE
                 (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                      APRIL 30,
                                                              -------------------------
                                                                 1998          1999
                                                              -----------   -----------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>
COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS
  PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income (loss)                                             $     1,680   $    (1,242)
                                                              -----------   -----------

Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding                                         9,437,000     9,546,000

Earnings per common share                                     $      0.18   $     (0.13)
                                                              ===========   ===========


COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE ASSUMING DILUTION:

Net income (loss)                                             $     1,680   $    (1,242)
                                                              -----------   -----------

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding            9,437,000     9,546,000

Net effect of dilutive common stock equivalents
   based on the treasury stock method, using
   the average market price                                       320,000          --
                                                              -----------   -----------

Common shares outstanding assuming dilution                     9,757,000     9,546,000
                                                              ===========   ===========
Earnings per common share assuming dilution                   $      0.17   $     (0.13)
                                                              ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Patrick Leon Washington v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-17-00905-CR

Trial court case number: 1490417

Trial court: 208th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Patrick Leon Washington, has filed a “Motion to Strike Current 

Appellant’s Brief and Substitute the Brief Being Filed With This Motion.” We grant the 

motion.

The filing of appellant’s corrected brief on July 2, 2018, does not modify any 

deadlines in this appeal.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting for the Court

Date: July 10, 2018
COVID-19 Guidance for 

In-Home Repair Services

OSHA is committed to protecting the health and safety of America’s workers and workplaces during 

the COVID-19 pandemic. The agency is issuing a series of alerts to help keep workers safe.

Taking the following steps can help reduce the risk of exposure to the coronavirus for workers who 

perform in-home repair services:

 Instruct sick workers to stay home.

 Prior to arrival, ask if anyone in the house has been diagnosed with COVID-19 or exposed to an 

individual with COVID-19.

 Delay non-emergency work if someone is quarantining or isolating in the house. Follow all 

appropriate infection control measures if the work cannot be delayed.

 Provide and have all workers wear face coverings (i.e., cloth face coverings or surgical masks) that 

have at least two layers of tightly woven breathable fabric, unless their work task requires a 

respirator. Face coverings should be provided at no cost to workers.

 Instruct home occupants to wear face coverings during service.

 Ensure that workers wear gloves and clean and disinfect surfaces or equipment.

 Instruct workers to avoid shaking hands with customers or other occupants.

 Implement physically distancing practices to maintain at least six feet of distance between coworkers/contractors/customers. 

 Use walls and closed doors to separate workers from occupants of the home or install plastic 

sheeting to close off areas of the home.

 Do not allow workers to share tools and equipment. If sharing cannot be eliminated, clean and 

disinfect between each use.

 Ensure policies encourage workers to report any safety and health concerns to a supervisor.

For the latest guidance and other resources on protecting workers from coronavirus, visit OSHA’s 

Protecting Workers Guidance.

OSHA issues alerts to draw attention to 

worker safety and health issues and solutions.

 • osha.gov/coronavirus • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

OSHA 4101-03R 2021
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/11

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 11 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
#### THE STATE *v.*W. M. UNDERWOOD.

An appeal by the defendant in a criminal case to the Supreme Court, vacates the judgment below; *therefore,*in such a case, where the Supreme Oourt had decided that there was *no error,*and, upon the transcript being returned, the Solicitor moved for judgment: *Held,*that the defendant upon producing an unconditional *pardon,*had a right to be discharged without paying costs.

Motion, for discharge, by a defendant in a case of larceny, made before *Buxton, T.,*at Eall Term 1869 of Union Court.

The defendant had been convicted of larceny, and having appealed to the Supreme Court, judgment had been rendered there, that there was no error (63 N. C. 98,) and a transcript had been sent down accordingly. Thereupon, the Solicitor for the State moved for judgment; but the defendant, having produced an unconditional *far cion*from the Governor, moved that he be discharged, and that without paying costs. The Solicitor resisted the latter part of such motion. His Honor allowed the motion, and the Solicitor appealed.

*600
      *F. II.*Busbee, for *the*Attorney-General.

*No counsel, contra.*

Settle, J.

It has been a common practice in this State to grant pardons upon condition that the defendant pay all costs, &c.

Here, however, there is a general pardon of the offence, without condition. This was pleaded in open Court, after a prayer by the Solicitor for judgment. His Honor was of opinion that the effect of the pardon, was to discharge the defendant, and that he had no power to impose costs or any other conditions. In this opinion we concur.

In *Baldry*v. Packard, Cro. Charles, 47, cited upon the argument by the Attorney-General, which was a suit in the Spiritual Court for defamation, in which the parties had become interested in the question of costs; and, so in *Hall’s case,*3 Coke, 103, it is held that while all proceedings in the Ecclesiastical Court *ex-officio,*are for the King and, while, therefore, he may pardon any or all suits there pending, still after sentence given and costs taxed for the party, the pardon shall not discharge them. But, if the pardon had been obtained before the sentence, then the pardon had discharged the whole, for then the Court could not have proceeded to any sentence of the principal, and by consequence, not as to the costs which are but accessory. It is true that it is there resolved, that, although an appeal suspends the sentence for divers purposes, yet, by the first sentence *the*party, notwithstanding the appeal, had an interest in the costs which could not be discharged by the King’s pardon, and, that, therefore, as to this purpose, the first sentence is not suspended by the appeal. But we are not disposed to adopt this reasoning in a a case like ours, which is simply a prosecution in behalf of the .State. We think that the appeal to the Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the Superior Court for all purposes, *601■and the defendant’s being pardoned before judgment, puts an end to the whole matter. How it would have been had the pardon not been granted until after judgment, we-will not undertake to decide until the case is properly before us.

Per Curiam. Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, P.
Blake Dupuis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ P. Blake Dupuis
-------------------
P. Blake Dupuis
Chief Financial Officer
June 16, 2003
DATOS

RÁPIDOS

Departamento del Trabajo de EE.UU.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA

Para información más completa:

Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional

Consejos de Seguridad para Demolición

Trabajos de demolición incluyen muchos de los mismos peligros que se presentan durante otras actividades de construcción. Sin embargo, demolición también incluye peligros adicionales debido a la variedad de otros factores. Algunos de

estos incluyen: pinturas con contenido de plomo, objetos

puntiagudos y materiales que contienen asbestos. 

• Reforzarle o apuntale las paredes y piso de la estructuras

las cuales han sido dañadas y en las cuales los empleados

debén entrar.

• Inspeccione el equipo de protección personal (niciales en

ingles - PPE) antes de usarlo.

• Seleccione, póngase y utilice un equipo de protección personal apropiado para la taréa.

• Inspeccione los escalones, pasillos y escaleras; ilumine

todas las escaleras.

• Apague y tape todos los servicios de luz, gas, agua, vapor,

alcantarillados y otros servicios de linea; notifique a la

compañia de servicios apropiada.

• Proteja todas las aperturas de paredes hasta una altura de

42 pulgadas; cubra y asegure las aperturas de pisos con

materiales que sean capaces de soportar la carga que será

posiblemente aplicada.

• La aperturas en el piso usadas para la disposición de materiales no debén ser más de 25% del área total del piso.

• Use vertederos de escombro encerrado con portones en el

final de la descarga. para dejar caer material de la demolición al suelo o en un contenedor de la basura.

• Demolición de paredes exteriores y piso debén comenzar

en la parte de arriba de la estructura y proceder hacia

abajo.

• Los miembros estructurales y los que soportan la cargas

en cualquier piso no debén ser cortados o removidos

hasta que todos los pisos encima de ese piso hayan sido

removidos.

• Todas las cornizas de techos o otras piedras ornamentales

debén ser removidas antes de tirar las paredes hacia

abajo.

• Empleados no se deben permitir trabajar donde existen

peligros de colapso de estructura hasta que sea correjido

con puntales, refuerzos o otros medios efectivos.