alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

 

I, Michael D. Matte, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for CyberGuard Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 168 (Thursday, October 23, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1252]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        House of Representatives

Chamber Action
  The House was not in session today. The House is scheduled to meet at 
11 a.m. on Saturday, January 3, 2009, pursuant to the provisions of H. 
Con. Res. 440.
```
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

23 October 2006

(2006/C 256/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
November 20, 2008 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H10857 

H. Con. Res. 284: Mr. GOODLATTE. 

H. Con. Res. 434: Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota. 

H. Res. 1328: Mr. HIGGINS, and Ms. LORETTA

SANCHEZ of California. 

H. Res. 1477: Mr. GOODE, Mr. DAVID DAVIS

of Tennessee, Mr. BOYD of Florida, Mr. JONES

of North Carolina, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. DICKS, 

Mr. SHULER, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, and Mr. PICKERING. 

H. Res. 1482: Mr. GOODLATTE. 

H. Res. 1529: Ms. LINDA T. SA ́ NCHEZ of California, Mr. WEINER

f 

, and Mr. CUMMINGS. 

PETITIONS, ETC. 

Under clause 3 of rule XII, petitions 

and papers were laid on the clerk’s 

desk and referred as follows: 

340. The Speaker presented a petition of 

the National Urban League, relative to a letter asking for an economic stimulus that 

meets the urgent needs of the nation; to the 

Committee on Education and Labor. 

341. Also, a petition of the Polish Legion of 

American Veterans, relative to a resolution 

opposing the removal of memorials honoring 

heroic veterans; to the Committee on House 

Administration. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HOUSE
Argued and submitted June 27,

affirmed July 20, 1983

#### 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON et al, *Petitioners, v.*WASCO COUNTY COURT et al, *Respondents.*

(82-052; CA A26426)

666 P2d 299

Mark J. Greenfield, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Bernard L. Smith, District Attorney, Wasco County, The Dalles, waived appearance for respondent Wasco County Court.

Timothy V. Ramis, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Chidvalis Rajneesh Meditation Center. On the brief were Steven L. Pfeiffer and O’Donnell, Sullivan & Ramis, Portland.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*4PER CURIAM.

LUBA’s dismissal of the petition for review is affirmed, because the order sought to be reviewed, the proclamation of incorporation of the city, is not the final order involving a land use decision in the incorporation process. The order authorizing an incorporation election is the order reviewable by LUBA. *1000 Friends of Ore. v. Wasco Co. Court,*62 Or App 75, 659 P2d 1001, *rev den*295 Or 259 (1983).

Affirmed.
Consejos para Prevenir las Enfermedades 

Relacionadas con el Calor en el Trabajo

La exposición al calor al trabajar al aire libre y en espacios interiores

puede ser peligrosa.

Casi 3 de cada 4 muertes por las enfermedades relacionadas con el calor ocurren durante la primera 

semana de trabajo. Los trabajadores nuevos y los que regresan necesitan desarrollar lentamente la 

tolerancia al calor y trabajar turnos más cortos en el calor para empezar.

La exposición peligrosa al calor extremo puede ocurrir en espacios interiores y exteriores durante todo 

el año. Mantenga a los trabajadores seguros con estos consejos de seguridad útiles y fácil de seguir:

 Siga la Regla de 20% — el primer día, no permita que los empleados 

trabajen más de 20% de la duración del turno a intensidad plena en el 

calor. Aumente la duración de tiempo no más de 20% al día hasta estén 

acostumbradas a trabajar en el calor.

 Proporcione agua fría para beber — aliente a los trabajadores a beber al 

menos un vaso cada 20 minutos, aun si no tienen sed. 

 Descansos — permita a los trabajadores el tiempo para recuperase del 

calor bajo la sombra o en un sitio fresco.

 Use ropa adecuada— haga que los trabajadores usen sombrero y ropa 

liviana, de color claro, holgada y respirable de ser posible.

 Esté pendiente a sus compañeros — aliente a los trabajadores a 

vigilarse muy de cerca y vigilar a los demás por signos de enfermedades 

relacionadas con el calor.

 Busque cualquier signo de enfermedades relacionadas con el calor, incluyendo desmayo, mareos, 

náuseas, y espasmos musculares, y actúe rápido — en caso de duda, llame al 911.

 Ofrezca capacitación sobre los riesgos de estar expuesto al calor y cómo prevenir las 

enfermedades relacionadas. 

 Tenga listo un plan de emergencia para saber qué acciones debe tomar si uno de los trabajadores 

presenta síntomas de agotamiento por calor.

Visite www.osha.gov/calor para más información sobre la prevención y primeros auxilios para las 

enfermedades causadas por el calor.

Los avisos de OSHA se emiten en ocasiones para llamar la atención a 

asuntos y medidas de seguridad y salud de los trabajadores.

 • osha.gov/calor • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

OSHA 4067-07R 2021 | Prevent Heat Illness at Work (Spanish)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20751 and #20752; TENNESSEE Disaster Number TN-20019]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-4832-DR), dated October 9, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Tropical Storm Helene.                    

# DATES:

Issued on November 4, 2024.

*Incident Period:*                         September 26, 2024, through September 30, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         December 9, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         July 9, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

      ( print page 88852)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Tennessee, dated October 9, 2024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Hancock, Sevier.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-25973 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-73,556-03

EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER LAMAR MOORE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2007-503-C3B IN THE 54TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MCLENNAN COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to twenty-nine years’

imprisonment. The Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Moore v. State, No.

10-08-00211-CR (Tex. App.–Waco, July 2, 2009). Applicant filed this application for a writ of

habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant attaches an affidavit to his writ application, which he alleges is newly discovered

evidence. The State calls into question the credibility of the unsworn affidavit and claims that, even

if true, Applicant fails to show that his sentence would have been different without that testimony. 

The application was forwarded to this Court without the trial court making findings of fact and
conclusions of law. We remand this application to the trial court to complete an evidentiary

investigation addressing whether the affidavit provides a newly available factual basis for a

subsequent writ application. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07 Sec. 4(c). If the trial court determines

the affidavit overcomes the Section 4 bar to subsequent applications, the trial court shall also make

findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the credibility of the affidavit and the effect of this

evidence on Applicant’s sentence. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: October 7, 2020

Do not publish
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10702]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    THIS MAY BE THE DAY AMERICA DIED

  (Ms. FOXX asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Ms. FOXX. Madam Speaker, there is a song ``The Day the Music Died.'' 
I don't think it is too much of a stretch to say this may be the day 
America died. I am not alone in feeling that what the Congress is about 
to do today is a very, very serious, consequential thing for this 
country.
  I want to quote from an article from Investor's Business Daily today.
  ``After years of faking it, the Federal Government has finally hit 
bottom or, depending on how you look at it, ascended to its level of 
maximum destructive incompetence.''
  ``Through its power over education and communications, Washington 
already influences the creation and dissemination of knowledge. Once it 
takes over the financial industry, nothing will be left standing in the 
way of the Federal Government's dominance. States and localities are 
mere administrative units and disbursing agents for Washington. 
Government has won its war against religion, sidelining churches.''
  ``American capitalism is not just an economic theory. It is a way of 
life where rewards are based on achievement, not identity or class, and 
is therefore inextricably bound up with individual freedom and American 
exceptionalism.''

                          ____________________
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            SIX MONTHS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     7,023,000
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                             20,337,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  293,000
<INVENTORY>                                3,725,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          41,027,000
<PP&E>                                     2,369,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            40,242,000
<CURRENT-LAIBILITIES>                     25,151,000
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      45,962
<OTHER-SE>                                16,450,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              40,242,000
<SALES>                                   39,528,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          39,528,000
<CGS>                                     29,991,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              7,113,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           711,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,886,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 755,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1,131,828
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,131,828
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .27
        

</TABLE>
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT J ULY 18, 2005 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [D O N OT P UB LISH ] IN TH E U NITE D S TAT ES C OUR T OF AP PE ALS F OR TH E E LE V EN TH C IR C U IT

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 04- 1637 0 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D.C. Dock etNo. 0 4- 00 05 9- CR-3 -LAC UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Plaintiff-Appellee, ve rs us SA ND OR DO NA LD BO ZS AR, D ef en da nt- Appe llant.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ Appe al f ro m the U nit ed

S ta te s D istri ct

Co urt fo r the N orthe rnD istri ct

of F lor ida

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ ( Jul y 18, 200 5) Before AN DE RSO N, BL ACK and BARKE TT , C ircuit Judg es PE R CU RIA M: Patr ic k L . Ja ck son, appoi nte d c ouns el f or S an dor D ona ld B oz sar in this dir ec t c ri m ina l a

ppe al , ha s m ove d to w ith dr awf ro m f urthe r re pr es en ta tio n of

the ap pe llant and f

ile d abr ie f pur suant t o A nde rs v. Ca lif or nia , 386 U . S. 738 , 87 S . Ct . 1396 , 18 L . E d. 2d 4 93 ( 1967 ). O ur ind ep en de nt r ev ie w of

the e nti re r ec or d r ev ea ls2

tha t c ouns el ’ s a sse ssm en t of the r el at ive m er it of

the appe al is co rr ec t. B ec au se ind ep en de nt e xa m ina tio n of the e nti re r ec or d r ev ea ls n o arg uable iss ue s of m er it, co unse l’ s m oti on t o w ith dr awis GRA NTE D , a nd B oz sar’ s c onvi ct iona nd sentence are AF FIRMED .
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000926978
<NAME>                        Frederick Brewing Co.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                         800,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  659,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (35,544)
<INVENTORY>                                    713,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,427,288
<PP&E>                                       9,147,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                (562,397)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,468,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,683,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,718,340
<COMMON>                                           354
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,378,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,468,231
<SALES>                                        919,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               919,716
<CGS>                                          804,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,552,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,660)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (736,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (736,004)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (736,004)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.12)
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. GEORGE H. PIPPIN.

*Fornication and Adultery*— Evidence.

In fornication and adultery, evidence of acts anterior to the two years preceding the finding of the bill of indictment, is competent to be considered by the jury in connection with evidence of other acts of a like nature within the two years.

*(State*v. *Kemp,*87 N. C. 538, cited and approved).

INDICTMENT for fornication and adultery tried at Fall Term, 1882, of Martin Superior Court, before *Gilliam, J.*

The defendants appealed.

*647*Attorney-General,*for the State.

*Messrs. Pruden & Shaw,*for defendants.

Smith, C. J.

The defendants (George H. Pippin and Tabitha Hawkins) are charged with maintaining an illicit sexual intercourse during the two years preceding the finding of the bill of indictment, and, on the trial, to prove the offence, evidence was admitted of their being seen in bed together at a tinte antecedent to that protected by the statute of limitations.

The court charged the jury that it was competent for them to consider the relations between the parties as subsisting more than two years before the finding of the bill, and the other circumstances in evidence, including the fact that for the past two years and up to the trial they had lived alone in the same house.

To this instruction is directed the only exception relied on and pressed in this court. We find no error in the instruction, and it is fully warranted by the case of *State*v. *Kemp,*87 N. C., 538. Let this be certified, &c.

No error. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         122,457
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               571,579
<PP&E>                                      16,563,944
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,258,862)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,305,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,473,231
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,438
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,424,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,305,082
<SALES>                                        698,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               698,305
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               519,841
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             176,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,738
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,738
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,738
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .001
        




</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. LAMARTH DUBOSE, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 489 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 9th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.