alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.4****CERTIFICATION**I, Kevin Kyser, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affiliated ComputerServices, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3.*{Intentionally omitted};*4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: October 19, 2007 /s/ Kevin Kyser   Kevin Kyser,   Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer ofAffiliated Computer Services, Inc.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-2906 Directorate ID: 2014-SW-068-AD

Helicopter Model: 

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 130 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent main rotor (M/R) blade grip failure, 

separation of the M/R blade, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $56,385 for two grips

Labor per Helicopter

(20 work hours X $85 for 

replacement)

$1,700

Other

(Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $58,085

Total US Fleet Cost $7,551,050

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Scott Franke
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

-c.llua 

.-eunn. 

xou. Job8A.Haoailton 

Plrtriat Attorney 

lihtedor, Teas 

purpaeo of thi8 Act the term, 

rball w8n s final oanrietlon. 

Aleo, for t&i parposo otthI A&, a iorfsiture 

of bail or oellatorel deporlted to 8wum l 

emi lr a da a tías p a r ek nee in uo ur t, vhleh fo r - 

r 0ituz-a he r h9î o b o *n r a o a teb , s& l bo eq uir elent to 8 aontbtlon.* 
s22 

Aasirtnat Attorney Oenersl , aQdres8sd to Bcimr OeWlsoa, 

Jr, Direat&, Departmat of Fublio Safety, Aqdln, T~Hs, 

holding that: 

*Theo 18 a0 wadetory 21u6perusioa of 

driver'8 liowl8a in the oaw ar ociaviotion 

wherein n tuspendsd wateaoe is given tmlasr 

and until ruoh judmat baa koow final by 

l atlon of the court in keeping !TSth the t e?ma 

Iror your oontenleno~ we l aalo8r ~1 Oopf at thth 

d~ore wntloned oplnloa. 

. In via? oi the above meatioaad apin%os end the 

auth0titiee aited therein, you 8m ~t3pO0m.n~ 0twieed 

that it-is the opinion-ofthi dspartmnt that when a d&endwt has been oonricted of drivhg a-motor rahlale under 

?ho lnflaeaae at lntorhati* llquar, under ~Mlole 808 

of tha Ptmel Code anl tha sentewe ha8 been mspanded, 

all the punishment ineluding the retokation OS a defondant’a Uo*nse wzntid be dUSQMild8d under the jwl#neat aad 

that the defendant*8 licentm oeanot be revoked under Art%- 

018 68E#a Varnon*r Rarimd Civil Statulms, where be has 

been oomhdl of drirlng a motor rehlols upon a pub118 

road tiile intorioated and his juclgmsnt af mwiatioa ha8 

been suepsndbd. 

Trurtl thd 

% 

the foregoing fully ,BparerB your 

inquiry, '18 rwn 

Yours tory truly 

ATTORNEY CRgagRAt OF TEUAS 

ATTORNEY GENE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.21

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                          BANCORPSOUTH CAPITAL TRUST IV

         THIS Certificate of Trust of BancorpSouth Capital Trust IV (the
"Trust"), dated as of October 31, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss. 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

                  1.       Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is
BancorpSouth Capital Trust IV.

                  2.       Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of
the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are The Bank of New York
(Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.

                  3.       Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be
effective upon filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust,
have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)
of the Act.

                                    THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE), not in its
                                    individual capacity but solely as trustee
                                    of the Trust



                                    By:    /s/ William T. Lewis
                                           ------------------------------------
                                    Name:
                                           ------------------------------------
                                    Title: WILLIAM T. LEWIS, SVP
                                           ------------------------------------

                                    THE BANK OF NEW YORK, not in its individual
                                    capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust



                                    By:     /s/ Robert A. Massimillo
                                            -----------------------------------
                                    Name:   Robert A. Massimillo
                                            -----------------------------------
                                    Title:  VICE PRESIDENT
                                            -----------------------------------



                                    /s/ Aubrey B. Patterson
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    AUBREY B. PATTERSON, not in his
                                    individual capacity but solely as trustee of
                                    the Trust



                                    /s/ L. Nash Allen, Jr.
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    L. NASH ALLEN, JR., not in his individual
                                    capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2024 11 334 2024 21 2898 2024 31 2118 2024 32 706 2024 41 5 2024 42 3 2024 43 37 2024 51 4 2024 52 164 2024 53 24 2024 54 43 2024 61 63 2024 62 86
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 891 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 891

 To amend section 922(x) of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit 
   the transfer to and possession of handguns, semiautomatic assault 
 weapons, and large capacity ammunition feeding devices by individuals 
       who are less than 21 years of age, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 1999

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 922(x) of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit 
   the transfer to and possession of handguns, semiautomatic assault 
 weapons, and large capacity ammunition feeding devices by individuals 
       who are less than 21 years of age, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Juvenile Gun Loophole Closure Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER TO AND POSSESSION OF HANDGUNS, 
              SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS, AND LARGE CAPACITY 
              AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES BY INDIVIDUALS LESS THAN 21 
              YEARS OF AGE.

    Section 922(x) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting a semicolon; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(C) a semiautomatic assault weapon; or
            ``(D) a large capacity ammunition feeding device.'';
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting a semicolon; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(C) a semiautomatic assault weapon; or
            ``(D) a large capacity ammunition feeding device.'';
            (3) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``, 
                semiautomatic assault weapon, or large capacity 
                ammunition feeding device'' after ``handgun''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``or 
                ammunition'' and inserting ``, ammunition, 
                semiautomatic assault weapon, or large capacity 
                ammunition feeding device''; and
            (4) in paragraph (5), by striking ``18'' and inserting 
        ``21''.
                                 <all>
```
ST ATE of WISCONSIN 

~ 

• 

OFFICEof the GOVERNOR 

WHEREAS, observed annually on the anniversary of the creation of the federal 

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Workers' Memorial Day recognizes 

and pays tribute to the memory of all workers who have died while on the job; and 

WHEREAS, OSHA was established by the landmark Occupational Safety and Health 

Act of 1970, which made it the responsibility of employers to maintain safe and healthy 

workplaces, and is tasked with ensuring good working conditions by setting and enforcing 

standards and by providing employers with training, education, and assistance to help them 

meet those standards; and 

WHEREAS, despite advances in health and safety standards and enforcement over the 

past half-century, according to the AFL-CIO, an average of 15 workers in the United States 

are killed while at work each day; and 

WHEREAS, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data report that in 2021, there were 5,190 

fatal work-related injuries across the United States, with 105 fatalities occurring in Wisconsin 

alone; and 

WHEREAS, the highest concentration of workplace fatalities in 2021 occurred in 

transportation-related occupations and the construction industry, with 2,474 fatal work 

injuries nationwide, and 302 fatalities occurred among police officers and frrefighters and 218 

occurred among workers in farming, fishing, and forestry occupations; and 

WHEREAS, today, the state of Wisconsin joins workers, working families, and labor 

unions in honoring and remembering those who were killed or injured while on the job and 

reaffirms its commitment to ensuring the health and safety of all workers across the state; 

NOW,THEREFORE, I, Tony Evers, Governor of the State of Wisconsin, 

do hereby proclaim April 28, 2023, as 

WORKERS' MEMORIAL DAY 

throughout the State of Wisconsin and I commend this observance 

to all our state's residents. 

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have 

hereunto set my hand and caused the 

Great Seal of the State of Wisconsin 

to be affixed. Done at the Capitol in 

the City of Madison this 24th day 

of March 2023. 

ONYEVERS 

GOVERNOR 

S GODLEWSKI \,___,/ 

Secretary of State
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 891

To amend section 922(x) of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the

transfer to and possession of handguns, semiautomatic assault weapons,

and large capacity ammunition feeding devices by individuals who are

less than 21 years of age, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 27, 1999

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend section 922(x) of title 18, United States Code,

to prohibit the transfer to and possession of handguns,

semiautomatic assault weapons, and large capacity ammunition feeding devices by individuals who are less than

21 years of age, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Juvenile Gun Loophole

5 Closure Act’’.
2

•S 891 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER TO AND POSSESSION

2 OF HANDGUNS, SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT

3 WEAPONS, AND LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNI4 TION FEEDING DEVICES BY INDIVIDUALS

5 LESS THAN 21 YEARS OF AGE.

6 Section 922(x) of title 18, United States Code, is

7 amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (1)—

9 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’

10 at the end;

11 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the

12 period at the end and inserting a semicolon;

13 and

14 (C) by adding at the end the following:

15 ‘‘(C) a semiautomatic assault weapon; or

16 ‘‘(D) a large capacity ammunition feeding de17 vice.’’;

18 (2) in paragraph (2)—

19 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’

20 at the end;

21 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the

22 period at the end and inserting a semicolon;

23 and

24 (C) by adding at the end the following:

25 ‘‘(C) a semiautomatic assault weapon; or
3

•S 891 IS

1 ‘‘(D) a large capacity ammunition feeding de2 vice.’’;

3 (3) in paragraph (3)—

4 (A) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘,

5 semiautomatic assault weapon, or large capacity

6 ammunition feeding device’’ after ‘‘handgun’’;

7 and

8 (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘or

9 ammunition’’ and inserting ‘‘, ammunition,

10 semiautomatic assault weapon, or large capacity

11 ammunition feeding device’’; and

12 (4) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘18’’ and in13 serting ‘‘21’’.

Æ
II

Calendar No. 112

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 858

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 18 Greenville Street in Newnan, Georgia, as the ‘‘Lewis R. Morgan

Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 22, 1999

Mr. COVERDELL (for himself and Mr. CLELAND) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

MAY 12, 1999

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 18 Greenville Street in Newnan, Georgia, as the ‘‘Lewis R. Morgan Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 858 RS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LEWIS R. MORGAN FEDERAL

2 BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURT3 HOUSE.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 18 Greenville Street in Newnan, Georgia, shall

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Lewis R. Morgan Fed7 eral Building and United States Courthouse’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

11 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec12 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lewis

13 R. Morgan Federal Building and United States Court14 house’’.

Calendar No. 112

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 858

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United

house’’.Federal Building and United States Courtin Newnan, Georgia, as the ‘‘Lewis R. MorganStates courthouse located at 18 Greenville Street

MAY 12, 1999

Reported without amendment
#### J. M. LONG *v.*A. *F.*GRAEBER.

A tenant by the curtesy *consummate*may sell his estate, notwithstanding the act, Rev. Code, c. 56, s. 1.

*(Houston*v. *Broten,*7 Ire. 162, approved.)

Civil action for possession of land and for damages, tried before Cloud, J., at Spring Term 1870, of Eowan Court.

The plaintiff claimed title under a deed by one Gibson, dated 1863, and the latter, under a deed made in 1862 to him as trustee to pay debts, by the defendant. The defendant’s title was as husband of a wife he had married in 1831, -and *432who died in 1861, having had issue born alive, and capable of inheriting.

The defendant claimed that his deed to Gibson was void, as contravening the provisions of the Bevised Oode, c. 56, s. 1.

His Honor gave judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

*Boyden &*Bailey, for the appellant.

*Blackmer Sc McGorhle, contra.*

Settle, J.

Oonld Graeber, who was tenant by the curtesy consummate, sell his estate ? He professed to do so by deed in trust to secure the payment of his debts; but he now contends that the law was more careful of his interests and the rights of the issue by the marriage, than he showed himself to be, and that he, and every one else, is prohibited from selling his estate by Bev. Code, ch. 56, sec. 1, in order' that he, at all events, and perhaps his children also, may have a homestead. He seems to think that there is a magic about the *Homestead*which will drive off all debts, though they be secured by deed in trust or other lien. In this he is mistaken.

The principle which governs this case is laid down with great clearness in *Houston*v. *Brown,*7 Ire. 162. The views contended for, however, in the two cases are widely different.

In *Houston*v. *Brown*the heirs at law attempted to eject the tenant by the curtesy, upon the ground that the act under consideration takes away the husband’s right to an estate by the curtesy. Here the tenant contends that the same enactment binds his estate so fast to him that neither he nor any one else can sever it.

The true purpose of the act, it is said in the case just cited, “ was to adopt to a partial extent thé principle of the *433homestead law, and provide a home for the wife during her life, leaving the. rights of the husband unimpaired and unrestricted after her death.” During ■ her life the husband is under certain restrictions, but “ after her death there is no intimation of an intention to interfere with his rights according to the common law.”

Pee Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51280

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICARDO VELAZQUEZ-LEON, also known as Ricardo

Velasquez, also known as Ricardo Velazquez, 

also known as Ricardo Velasquez-Leon,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-376-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ricardo

Velazquez-Leon raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 4.8


                                  A.S.V., INC.
            AMENDMENT TO 1998 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN
                 ADOPTED AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                              HELD JANUARY 18, 2000

         NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Section 6(a) of the A.S.V., Inc.
1998 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") shall be amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

                  (a) Annual Option Grants. An option to purchase 3,000 shares
         of Common Stock shall be granted automatically on the first business
         day of each calendar year (the "Annual Option Grant Date") during the
         term of the Plan, beginning on January 2, 2001 to each eligible
         director in office on such Annual Grant Date. In addition, on a
         one-time only basis, an option to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock
         shall be granted effective as of January 18, 2000 to each eligible
         director in office on such date.

         RESOLVED FURTHER, that Section 6(b) of the Plan shall be amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

                  (b) Grants to New Directors. An option to purchase 2,250
         shares of Common Stock shall be granted automatically on the day that
         any eligible director is first elected to the Board of Directors;
         provided, however, that if such day is not a business day, such grant
         shall be effective on the first business day following such election.
         Such grants shall be made only to eligible directors who were not
         directors of the Company prior to the date this Plan was adopted by the
         Board of Directors.

         RESOLVED FURTHER, that a new Section 6(f) shall be added to the Plan to
read as follows:

                  (f) Election to Decline Option. Notwithstanding anything
         contained in this agreement to the contrary, any eligible director may
         decline to receive options hereunder by notice to the Company.