Omadatech, LLC 68 Stacy Haines Road, Suite 110 Lumberton, NJ 08048

January 19, 2016 U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Sir or Madam, Omadatech, LLC is applying for an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations referenced in this document to allow for commercial operations utilizing its UAS equipment for the purposes of aerial data collection and photography. The company’s main objective is to be able to use UAS equipment to aid in the inspection of electric transmission and distribution systems. Omadatech intends to conduct all operations in accordance with the regulations set forth by the Federal Aviation Administration. In many cases, a helicopter is used to perform aerial inspections of various electrical systems. During these inspections, a utility worker identifies possible defects in the various components of a structure. We believe the use of a UAS would significantly lower operational costs, increase public safety, reduce noise, and result in a reliable inspection method. All of these factors result in a benefit to the general public. Omadatech believes this application will satisfy all conditions set forth in Section 333 of the Reform Act. Safety is always our main concern and we feel the use of UAS for utility inspection meets or exceeds the level of safety currently experienced with traditional aircraft used for these purposes. Omadatech, LLC plans to initially operate the following UAS models: 1) DJI Phantom 3 Professional; 2) DJI Inspire 1 Pro; 3) DJI S1000 +

The details of this application begin on the following page. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, 

# Rob e t DeS o sa Robert DeSousa Operator / Administrator Omadatech, LLC

1Exemption is Requested From the Following Regulations: Part 21, Subpart H ; 45. 23 (b), 45. 25, 45. 27 (a), 45. 29 ; 61. 113 (a) (b) , 61. 133 (a) ; 91. 7 (a); 91. 9 (b)(2)(c); 91. 103; 91. 105; 91. 109 (a); 91. 119; 91. 121; 91. 151 (a)(1) (b); 91. 203 (a) (b); 91. 405 (a); 91. 407 (a)(1); 91. 409 (a)(2); 91. 417 (a) (b);

Omadatech, LLC seeks exemption from the above mentioned FARs and presents the methods by which the company will ensure an equivalent or exceeding level of safety in regard to the regulations from which the exemption is sought. (14 CFR 11.81 (e).

214 CFR Part 21, Subpart H, Airworthiness Certificates Section 91.203(a)(1) requires civil aircraft to have “an appropriate and current airworthiness certificate.” Part 21, Subpart H (“Airworthiness Certificates”) establishes the procedural requirements and applicability for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as directed by 14 C.F.R. § 91.203(a)(1). Equivalent level of safety: The UAS operated will have a gross weight less than 55 lbs. and will be operated at speeds below 87 knots (100mph). Risk to persons or property is reduced since no personnel or passengers will be carried and no flammable fuel is required. All operations will be conducted using an Operator and if deemed required, a Visual Observer(s). All operations will be conducted in accordance with the limitations and conditions stated in this petition. The Federal Aviation Act and Section 333 of the Reform Act authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement of an airworthiness certificate upon consideration of the UAS’ size, weight, speed, operational capability and proximity to airports and populated areas. The conditions by which the UAS will be operated, as described in this petition, given the size, weight, speed and proximity to airports and populated areas achieve or exceed the level of safety currently experienced by using manned aircraft for the same purposes. The FAA has stated that no exemption is required from this section if a finding is made under the Reform Act that a UAS provides an equivalent level of safety compared to aircraft normally used for the same application. Please see granted exemptions 11138, 11062, 11067, 11080, 11114, and 11112. 14 CFR 45.23 (b) , Display of marks; general This regulation states: “...the operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than two inches nor more than six inches high, the words ‘limited’, ‘restricted’, ‘light-sport’, ‘experimental’, or ‘provisional’, as applicable.” Equivalent level of safety: Given the size of the UAS, letters not less than two inches in size may not be practical. If the size of the UAS is too small to display markings in the size described in 45.23 (b), then markings will be displayed in the largest practicable manner. Since the UAS does not have a cabin, cockpit, or cabin entrance, markings cannot be displayed “near the entrance”. Marking will be placed in the most visible areas of the UAS to allow for identification. 14 CFR 45.25 , Location of marks on fixed wing aircraft 14 CFR 45.25 states the aircraft “... must display the required marks on either the vertical tail surfaces or the sides of the fuselage...”. Equivalent level of safety: The design of the UAS is significantly different than traditional manned aircraft. Because of this, the marking requirements of 14 CFR 45.25 may not be feasible. An equal level of safety will be achieved by displaying markings on the most visible surfaces of the UAS to allow for easy identification.

314 CFR 45.27 (a) , Location of marks; non-fixed-wing aircraft Regulation 14 CFR 45.27 (a) states that: “Each operator of a rotorcraft must display on that rotorcraft horizontally on both surfaces of the cabin, fuselage, boom, or tail the marks required by 45.23.” Equivalent level of safety: The design of the UAS is significantly different than traditional manned aircraft. Because of this, the marking requirements of 14 CFR 45.25 may not be feasible. An equal level of safety will be achieved by displaying markings on the most visible surfaces of the UAS to allow for easy identification. 14 CFR 45.29 , Size of marks Regulation 14 CFR 45.29 describes the required size of the marks and characteristics of the lettering for aircraft. In many cases, it dictates that marks be at least 12 inches high. Equivalent level of safety: The UAS is significantly smaller in size and can have a very different design layout when compared to traditional manned aircraft. The size and layout of marks described in 14 CFR 45.29 may not be feasible. An equal level of safety will be achieved by displaying markings on the most visible surfaces of the UAS to allow for easy identification. If the UAS is too small to display markings in standard size, the aircraft markings will be displayed in the largest practicable manner. 14 CFR 61.113 (a) (b) and 14 CFR 61.133 (a) , Private pilot privileges and limitations; pilot in command; commercial pilot privileges and limitations Regulation 14 CFR 61.113 restricts private pilots from flying aircraft for compensation or hire and requires a second class medical certificate. 14 CFR 61.133 requires a pilot to hold a commercial pilot’s license when acting as pilot in command of an aircraft used for compensation or hire. Equivalent level of safety: The UAS operated by Omadatech, LLC will be operated as part of a commercial operation, however no passengers or cargo will be carried. All UAS operations will remain below 500 feet AGL, below 87 knots (100 mph), will not carry flammable fuel and will not exceed the weight of 55 lbs. Please reference FAA Docket No. FAA-2014-0352. The FAA determined that UAS operations did not warrant the additional cost and restrictions imposed by requiring the operator to have a commercial pilot certificate along with a Class II Medical Certificate. All Omadatech UAS operators will posses at least a private pilot certificate or receive equivalent training as set forth by the FAA. Training will be provided to all operators. This training will be provided by either a third party or a custom in-house program. The program will follow industry best practices and consist of ground instruction as well as actual hands-on training to simulate the operating environment. Additionally, the security screening conducted by the Transportation Security Administration of certified airmen will satisfy the requirements of Section 333 to ensure that no operation poses a threat to national security.

414 CFR 91.7 (a) , Civil aircraft airworthiness This regulation states: “No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy condition.” Equivalent level of safety: The FAA has stated that no exemption is required to the extent that the requirements of Part 21 are waived or found inapplicable. Omadatech LLC requests that the requirements of Part 91.7 be treated in accordance with FAR Part 21 Subpart H. Omadatech LLC’s operators will inspect the aircraft prior to each flight and ensure the aircraft is safe for flight. See granted exemption 11062. 14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2) (c) , Approved flight manual in the aircraft Regulation 14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2) states: “No person may operate a U.S. registered civil aircraft ... for which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by 21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof.” Regulation 14 CFR 91.9 (c) states: “No person may operate a U.S. registered civil aircraft unless that aircraft is identified in accordance with Part 45 of this chapter.” Equivalent level of safety: Omadatech LLC requests exemption from this regulation as outlined in the request for exemption from Regulation 14 CFR 91.203 (a) and (b). An equivalent level of safety and compliance will be achieved by keeping the proper documentation at the location of the Ground Control Station available to the operator at all times. This documentation includes the UAS operation manual provided by the manufacturer or equivalent documents created by Omadatech, LLC. The FAA, in accordance with the FAA Office of Chief Counsel’s Opinion dated August 8, 2014, the UAS flight manual, registration certificate and other documentation will be kept at the control station with the operator during flight. The Chief Counsel’s Office has held that for UAS operations, this alternative method constitutes full compliance with the regulations. See granted exemption 11062. 14 CFR 91.103 , Preflight action This regulation requires the pilot in command to become familiar with specific information before each flight, including the information contained in the FAA approved flight manual on board the aircraft. Equivalent level of safety: The UAS design is significantly different than that of traditional manned aircraft. Because of this, the UAS does not have a flight manual physically on board. The operator will become familiar with the manufacturer supplied UAS manual for information prior to flight. The manual will be kept at the ground station during operations. In addition, the operator will review information prior to flight to maintain the safety of operation. This information will include but no limited to, the weather, battery levels, landing and takeoff distances and performance data. The FAA has stated that no exemption is required (see Grant of Exemption No. 11062, p.20) however, an exemption is requested to the extent that an FAA approved flight manual is required.

514 CFR 91.105 , Flight crew members at stations 14 CFR 91.105 contains requirements for crew members during takeoff and landing. Crew members are required to be at their stations unless absence is necessary to perform their duties. It also requires crew members to keep safety belts, including shoulder harnesses if equipped, fastened. Equivalent level of safety: The UAS does not carry pilots or passengers. There are no crew member stations. The UAS does have a Ground Control Station from which the operator controls the aircraft. The Ground Control Station may be a fixed location or mobile. However, the Ground Control Station is not a part of the aircraft and therefore may not have seats or safety belts. In addition to the operator, a visual observer will be utilized to keep the UAS in line of sight view and look out for general safety. The visual observer may not be at the fixed or mobile location and may or may not use a seat equipped with a safety belt. The use of a safety belt may not be feasible because the stations are not physically part of the aircraft and are not in motion. 14 CFR 91.109 (a) , Flight instruction 14 CFR 91.109 (a) states: “No person may operate a civil aircraft that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls.” By design, UASs do not generally have functioning dual controls. Control is accomplished via radio signals from a Flight Control System / Ground Control Station. Equivalent level of safety: During flight instruction, the aircraft will remain at a safe distance from nonparticipating individuals causing no safety hazard. No pilots or passengers will be on board the aircraft. We believe an equivalent level of safe training can be achieved without dual controls especially given the size and speed of the UAS. The FAA has previously granted exemptions for flight training without dual controls. See granted exemptions 11109, 11138, and 11110. 14 CFR 91.119 , Minimum safe altitudes 14 CFR 91.119 states that an aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle or structure. The nature of Omadatech LLC’s operations may require operation in close proximity to items such as power lines towers or poles. However, operations will never be performed over non-participating individuals. Equivalent level of safety: The UASs operated by Omadatech LLC are significantly smaller than traditional, manned aircraft such as rotorcraft that are used for similar operations. The UAS does not carry persons or cargo, weighs less than 55 lbs., does not carry flammable fuel, will not exceed 87 knots (100 mph) and will

6never be flown over non-participating individuals. Operations will remain below 500 AGL and will utilize an operator and visual observer to avoid risk to persons or property. This provides a greater level of safety when compared to traditional aircraft used for the same purposes. See granted exemptions 4063, 11138, 11136, 11112, 11110, 11109, 11080, 11066, 11063, 11062 and 11067. 14 CFR 91.121 , Altimeter settings 14 CFR 91.121 requires aircraft to be operated by reference to an altimeter that is set to the elevation of the departure airport or barometric pressure when operating below 18,000 feet MSL. Some UASs contain a barometric pressure sensor. Other types utilize GPS sensors to determine altitude. Equivalent level of safety: The operator will confirm the elevation of the departure point prior to takeoff. This information will be compared to the altitude provided by the GPS sensor or barometric sensor on the UAS. The sensor information is displayed at the Ground Control Station. The operator will determine the maximum permissible altitude to maintain flight below 500 feet AGL. This altitude will not be exceeded. The maximum permissible altitude will also be monitored by visual means. Visual reference will be maintained by the operator and visual observer as a secondary backup to the data provided by the UAS sensors. This will provide a level of safety that equals or exceeds the regulation. See granted exemptions 11153, 11150, 11138, and 11159. 14 CFR 91.151 (a) (1) (b) , Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions 14 CFR 91.151 (a) (1) states: “No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed - (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes...” 14 CFR 91.151 (b) states: “No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.” Omadatech LLC will only operate the UAS during daylight hours in VFR conditions. Because of technical limitations, most UASs limit total flight time to approximately 30 minutes before the battery is depleted. No meaningful flight time would be possible given the limitations of 14 CFR 91.151 (a) (1) and (b). Equivalent level of safety: The UAS flight will be terminated with at least 20% reserve power. This will allow the UAS to return to the landing zone with adequate power remaining to conduct a safe and controlled landing. Given the UAS’s size, weight, and speed, this limitation provides an equivalent or greater level of safety when compared to manned aircraft referenced in this regulation. See granted exemptions 2689F, 5745, 10673, 10808, 11138, 11136, 11112, 10650, and 10159.

714 CFR 91.203 (a) (b) , Carry civil aircraft certification and registration This regulation states: (a) “... no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has ... an appropriate and current airworthiness certificate.” Furthermore: (b) “No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under 91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew.” Equivalent level of safety: With regard to 14 CFR 91.203 (a), an equivalent level of safety is achieved through the methods and characteristics outlined in the request for exemption from 14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H. With regard to 14 CFR 91.203 (b), the UAS does not carry pilots or passengers, does not have storage to carry certification and registration documents, and does not have a cabin or cockpit entrance. An equivalent level of safety is achieved by maintaining the proper documentation at the Ground Control Station. This documentation is readily available to the operator. See granted exemptions 9565A, 9565B, 9789, 9789A, 9797, 9797A, 9816A and 9816. The FAA, in accordance with the FAA Office of Chief Counsel’s Opinion dated August 8, 2014, the UAS flight manual, registration certificate and other documentation will be kept at the control station with the operator during flight. The Chief Counsel’s Office has held that for UAS operations, this alternative method constitutes full compliance with the regulations. See granted exemption 11062. 14 CFR 91.405 (a), 91.407 (a)(1), 91.409 (a)(2), 91.417 (a) (b) , Maintenance inspections Regulations 14 CFR 91.405 (a), 91.407 (a)(1), 91.409 (a)(2) and 91.417 (a) (b) specify maintenance and inspection standards in reference to 14 CFR Part 43. Part 91.405 (a) requires that each owner or operator of an aircraft “...shall have the aircraft inspected as prescribed in Subpart E of this chapter and shall between required inspection...have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in Part 43 of this chapter.” An exemption is requested from these regulations because Part 43 and these sections apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. The UASs will not have this certificate. Equivalent level of safety: The UASs will be maintained and inspected in accordance with the manual supplied by the manufacturer. This includes but is not limited to maintenance, overhaul, replacement and inspection requirements for the UAS. Prior to the first flight of the day, the operator will carry out preflight inspections to ensure the UAS is in proper condition for safe operation. Any discrepancies that may affect the safety of operations will be addressed and repaired before the commencement of any flight. Given the size, operating limitations, and characteristics of the UAS described, this provides a level of safety equivalent to or greater than traditional manned aircraft used for similar operations.

8Statutory Authority for Requested Exemptions This petition is submitted in accordance with Section 333 of the Reform Act. Pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act, the FAA Administrator is to permit operation of an unmanned aircraft system where it does not create a hazard to users of the National Airspace System or the public, and does not pose a threat to national security based on the following considerations: 1) The size, weight, speed, and operational capability; 2) Operation in proximity to airports and populated areas; 3) Operation within visual line of sight of the operator. The Federal Aviation Act grants the FAA Administrator authority to grant exemptions from the agency’s safety regulations and minimum standards when the Administrator decides a requested exemption is in the public’s best interest. See 49 U.S.C 106 (f), 44701-44716. The party requesting the exemption must explain the reasons why the exemption: (1) would benefit the public as a whole, and (2) would not adversely affect safety or how it would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing regulations. See 14 CFR 11.81. Proposed Operations Omadatech LLC is requesting exemptions from the Federal Aviation Regulations stated in this petition pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act in order to perform power line and utility monitoring inspections of critical infrastructure and components. Inspections of electric utility components are currently performed using four traditional methods: (1) by manned aircraft (usually helicopter), (2) by motor vehicle, (3) by foot, or (4) utility worker climbing the utility structures. In many cases, these methods can be replaced or supplemented by using UAS to perform the inspection. The UAS can often provide better results, increased employee/public safety, and decreased costs when compared to current methods. Omadatech LLC will operate their UASs with high resolution, gimbal mounted cameras. Photos and/or video will be acquired of the structures to be inspected. Areas of a structure that were previously hard to inspect using traditional methods will now be accessible. This improves upon current inspection methods resulting in reliable power distribution, fewer outages, and potentially lower costs for power consumers. The ability to inspect the power system using UAS will increase employee safety, increase public safety , decrease inspection costs and many improve natural disaster response time. In addition, environmental benefits exist due to the fact that generally UAS do not release emissions. Proposed Operational Environments Omadatech LLC will operate its UAS n support of utility inspections. Most utilities utilize a helicopter to perform required inspections. The helicopter is often required to operate in the wire environment at low altitudes in order to place a utility worker in position to see various components. The helicopter is often operated for long periods of time in less than optimal conditions for safety such as in areas in which an autorotation may be difficult or impossible in the event of an engine failure. This can potentially place the aircraft, occupants and public in harms way.

9Omadatech LLC plans to initially operate the following UAS models: 1) DJI Phantom 3 Professional; 2) DJI Inspire 1 Pro; 3) DJI S1000 + Performing inspections with the UAS would eliminate these hazards. Since no persons are carried on board, crew safety increases. Because of it’s small size, hazards to the public are reduced or eliminated. The risk of fire due to carrying flammable fluids is also eliminated. All of this while also helping the environment. The UAS will be controlled by radio transmission from a Ground Control Station. All remote control equipment will consist of industry standard devices available to both professionals and consumers and will utilize FCC approved transmission and reception components. The UAS will be operated in the immediate area surrounding a utility structure such as a tower or pole. These structures are typically contained within a “right of way” (property) owned by the utility company. At no time will operations be conducted over non-participating persons. The flight area will constantly be monitored by both the operator and visual observer. Permission from the controlling utility company will be obtained prior to conducting any commercial flight operations within the right of way or in the vicinity of the structure. The operator and visual observer will remain in voice contact at all times during flight via either direct contact, radio or equivalent methods, depending on the optimal observer position as determined by the operator and observer. The observer will assist the operator in identifying both air and ground hazards. If such a hazard is observed, the flight will be altered or terminated immediately. Operation will resume once it is established that no hazards exist. Predetermined potential landing zones will be identified and briefed by the operator, observer, and participating persons prior to flight. Landing zones will be selected according to proximity to obstructions, observed ground conditions and limited exposure to persons and property. Operating Conditions and Limitations All operations will be conducted according to and in compliance with the following conditions and limitations : (A) All UASs utilized will weigh less than 55 lbs. (25 kg). (B) The aircraft will remain within visual line-of-sight (“VLOS”) of the operator and / or visual observer(s) at all times using vision unaided by any device with the exception of corrective lenses. (C) A visual observer (“VO”) may be utilized to satisfy the VLOS and observation requirements as defined herein. (D) The aircraft will not operate over non-participating persons.

10(E) Flight operations will be conducted only between the period of official sunrise and sunset as defined in the Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM). (F) The UAS will yield right-of-way to other aircraft, manned or unmanned. If there is a risk of a collision, the operator will immediately maneuver away. (G) Prior to flight, the UAS operator will assess weather conditions using FAA approved weather sources and direct weather observation, will check airspace restrictions and TFRs and will assess the location of people and property to lessen risks if he or she loses control of the UAS. (H) Flight operations will be conducted only with flight visibilities at or exceeding 3 statute miles. (I) The UAS will not be operated in airport flight paths, restricted airspace, or areas under current Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs). (J) The operator will discontinue the flight when continuing would pose a hazard to other aircraft, people or property. (K) The UAS will not exceed an airspeed of 87 knots (100 mph). (L) The UAS will not be operated at an altitude exceeding 500 feet above ground level (“AGL”). (M) Operations will not be conducted in Class A airspace. (N) ATC permission will be obtained prior to operations in Class B, Class C, Class D or Class E airspace. (O) A thorough preflight of the UAS will be conducted by the designated operator in command (“OIC”) prior to the first flight of the day or after any suspected or observed anomalies or damage. (P) The OIC will follow the suggested preflight actions as outlined in the sUAS operator’s manual or, if available, Catalyst Aviation LLC’s UAS operation guidelines. (Q) The operator will not operate a UAS should he or she know or has any reason to know of any physical or mental condition that would interfere with their safe operation of the aircraft. (R) The UAS will not be operated in a careless or reckless manner. Operator Requirements and Certification All Omadatech LLC operators will abide by the following conditions and requirements : (A) All operators will hold a current and valid Private, Commercial or ATP pilot certificate with ratings for one or more of the following categories: single-engine land airplane, multi-engine land airplane or rotorcraft

11helicopter. This requirement may be alternatively satisfied when / if FAA UAS operator testing, certification and currency requirements are approved. (B) All operators will be 18 years of age or older. (C) Operators or a designated Omadatech LLC official will make available to the FAA, upon request, the UAS for inspection or testing. (D) Operators or a designated Omadatech LLC official will maintain a log of flights as practicable for future currency or flight logging requirements. (E) An operator or a designated Omadatech LLC official will report an accident to the FAA within 10 days of any operation that results in damage to property, other than the aircraft, estimated to exceed $25,000 for repair (including materials and labor) or fair market value in the event of total loss, whichever is less and / or results in significant injury or death. UAS Registration, Markings and Requirements All Omadatech LLC UAS will be registered and marked according to the following conditions and requirements : (A) All UAS to be operated by Omadatech LLC will be maintained in condition for safe operation. (B) The UAS will be inspected prior to flight by the OIC to ensure that it is in a condition for safe operation. (C) All UAS to be operated by Omadatech LLC for commercial operations will be registered with the FAA. (D) All UAS to be operated by Omadatech LLC for commercial operations will be marked with an aircraft registration number according to 14 C.F.R. Part 45 or in the largest practicable manner taking into account the size and configuration of the aircraft.

Public Benefit and Interest Currently, aerial power line inspections are performed via helicopter or fixed-wing aircraft. The aircraft are typically flown at low altitude and in relative close proximity to the power line, structures or components. The use of UAS rather than a manned aircraft in such applications will further the public interest in several areas including but not limited to the following: • The UAS carries no passengers, pilot or crew, thereby increasing pilot, passenger and worker safety.

• The UAS can often eliminate the need for a worker to climb a tower or pole in order to inspect components

thereby increasing worker safety.

• The UAS carries no flammable fuel thereby increasing safety to the general public.

12• The UAS has a lower noise signature than a typical helicopter thereby improving public welfare.

• The UAS has no emissions thereby reducing the environment impact over traditional manned aircraft. • The UAS is less expensive to operate than a traditional manned aircraft thereby decreasing the cost of power line inspection. This allows utility companies to inspect their infrastructure more frequently, more thoroughly and at a potential discount thereby increase public welfare. • The UAS is less expensive to acquire than a manned aircraft thereby allowing for more inspection crews to operate concurrently. This can result in better-maintained infrastructure and more reliable power distribution for the public.

• The UAS may respond to natural disasters and storm-related damage quicker than manned aircraft. This

results in faster power restoration and lower outage time for the public.

13