July 28, 2015

Exemption No. 12194

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1856

Mr. Jonathan Yarger

Member

HD Mapping, LLC.

P.O. Box 645

Tannersville, NY 12485

Dear Mr. Yarger:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

By letter dated May 5, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of HD Mapping, LLC. (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an exemption. The 

petitioner requested to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct Aerial 

mapping, surveying, photography, filmmaking, inspections, and education and research.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner is a 3D Robotics X8–M.

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products 

and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates. In accordance with the statutory criteria 

provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in 
2

consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft 

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from 

14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness 

Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is 

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection1. The FAA has issued grants of 

exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. 

In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 

11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see

Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned 

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or 

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in 

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled 

by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, 

delegated to me by the Administrator, HD Mapping, LLC. is granted an exemption from 

14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 

91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to 

the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection.

This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

 

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. 

Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF 

analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (particulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by 

instruments aboard the UA.
3

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, HD Mapping, LLC. is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the 3D Robotics X8–

M when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any 

other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are 

not permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; 

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC 

must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 
4

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update 

or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then 

the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s 

UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding 

updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g., replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all 

potential discrepancies, e.g., inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 
5

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 
6

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. 

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.
7

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.
8

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures
1

U.S. Department of Transportation May 5th, 2015

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590 

HD Mapping, LLC.

Section 333 Petition to Operate

Small Unmanned Aerial Systems

Prepared by: 

Jonathan Yarger

Member, HD Mapping, LLC. 

P.O. Box 645 Tannersville, NY 12485

518-860-4812 info@hdmapping.com 
2

Table of Contents

Petition Summary.....................................................................................3

Statutory Authority...................................................................................3

Characteristics of the Aircraft.......................................................................3

Applications...........................................................................................4

The Petitioner Requests Relief From the Following..............................................4

The Petitioner has Supplied the Following Additional Information ...........................8

Pre-flight Inspection, Maintenance..................................................................8

UAS Operating Parameters ..........................................................................9

Pilot in Command (PIC).............................................................................9

Radio Frequencies...................................................................................10

Safety and Benefits of the UAS....................................................................10

Conclusion ...........................................................................................10
3

Petition Summary: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 

112-95 (2012), 126 Stat. 11 (“Section 333”) and the Federal Aviation Administration’s 

(“FAA”) general exemption authority under 49 U.S.C. section 44701(f), HD Mapping

(“Petitioner”) hereby petitions for exemptions from 14 C.F.R Part 21, Subpart H 

(Airworthiness Certificates), 14 C.F.R. Part 27 (Airworthiness Standards: Normal 

Category Rotorcraft), 14 C.F.R sections 61.113(a)-(b), 91.103(b)(1), 91.119(c), 91.121, 

91.151, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a)- (b). 

The proposed exemption, if granted, would allow Petitioner to conduct commercial 

operations of small unmanned aircraft systems (“UAS”) meeting or exceeding all of the 

operational and safety requirements Congress has set forth in Section 333. 

Statutory Authority 

Section 333, titled “Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems”, provides a 

mechanism for seeking expedited FAA authorization of safe civil UAS operations in the 

NAS. Section 333(a) states that the FAA “shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft 

systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the 

(comprehensive) plan and rulemaking required by section 332(b)(1) of this Act or the 

guidance required by section 334 of this Act.” In Section 332(b)(1), Congress made it

clear that Section 333 provides a mechanism for “expedited operation authorization” if 

several factors are met. Petitioner meets all requirements to permit FAA approval of 

commercial UAS operations. 

Characteristics of the Aircraft

The petitioner states that the unmanned aircraft (UA) to be operated under this request is 

less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, flies at a speed of no more than 50 knots, carries neither a 

pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operates 

exclusively within a secured area as set out in the Operation Manual. The craft is the X8-

M manufactured by 3D Robotics. The craft has a multi-copter design, GPS, full 

autonomous autopilot capabilities, telemetry, manual ground control and an on-screendisplay/first-person-view system.

In addition, the craft has integrated safety features built into the design of the UAS, as 

described in the Operation Manual, to ensure the safety of persons and property within 

and surrounding the limited operating area. The petitioner further describes that, in the 

event the UAS loses communications or its GPS signal, the UA will have the capability 

to return to a pre-determined location within the Security Perimeter and land. 

Applications
4

Petitioner is an aerial mapping company that plans to exploit the capabilities of 

Unmanned Aerial Systems to offer a multitude of services, including: 

- Aerial surveying 

- Aerial mapping

- Aerial filmmaking and photography 

- Energy systems inspections and asset management 

- Construction site inspections and monitoring 

- Wildlife and forestry monitoring 

- Educational and research operations 

- Pipeline inspection and patrolling 

The Petitioner Requests Relief From the Following: 

HD Mapping requests an exemption from the following regulations as well as any 

additional regulations that may technically apply to the operation of the 3D Robotics X8-

M: 

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 14 CFR § 91.203(a)(1) 

Section 91.203 requires all civil aircraft to have a certificate of airworthiness. Part 21, 

Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements 

for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR § 91.203(a). Given the 

size of the X8-M, its very light weight (aircraft weight is 7.7 pounds, with additional

capacity of 0.4 pounds) and the limited operating area associated with its utilization, it is 

unnecessary to go through the certificate of airworthiness process under Part 21 Subpart 

H in order to achieve or exceed current safety levels. 

Such an exemption meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 

and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act and Section 333 of the 

Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an 

airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational 

capability, and proximity to airports and populated areas of the UAS involved. An 

analysis of these different criteria demonstrates that the X8-M operated without an 

airworthiness certificate, under the conditions proposed in that exemption, will be at least 

as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. 

14 C.F.R. § 45.23 & 14 C.F.R. § 45.29: Display of marks; size of marks 

These regulations provide that each aircraft must display "N" and the aircraft's 

registration number in letters at least 3 inches high. Additionally, the aircraft must display 

the word "EXPERIMENTAL" in letters at least 2 inches high near the entrance to the 

cabin, cockpit, or pilot station. 
5

Given the size of the X8-M (aircraft dimension of 13.7 in x 20.1 in x 11.8 in), this 

requirement is impossible to match. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness 

This regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in 

airworthy condition. Should the exemption be granted allowing commercial operation of 

the X8-M without an airworthiness certificate, no standard will exist for airworthiness of 

the X8-M. Given the size of the aircraft and the requirements contained in the User Guide 

for maintenance and use of safety checklists prior to each flight an equivalent level of 

safety will be provided. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.9: Civil aircraft flight manual, marking, and placard requirements. 

This regulation provides that no person may operate an aircraft unless a current, approved 

flight manual is in the aircraft. HD Mapping assumes that the intent of this requirement is 

to ensure that flight manual information is available to the aircrew while operating the 

aircraft. HD Mapping requests an exemption to this requirement since the aircraft is not 

only too small to carry documentation, the documentation would not be available to the 

crew. 

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping a hard copy of the flight 

manual in the X8-M transportation box. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a) & 91.319(a)(1): Flight Instruction 

Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free 

balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning 

dual controls. 

By design, UAS and remotely piloted aircraft do not have fully functional dual controls. 

Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with 

the aircraft via radio communications. The equivalent level of safety is provided by the 

fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft, the ability to control 

the UAS via radio signals from the controller and by the size and speed of the aircraft. 

14 CFR § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes 

The regulation provides that over sparsely populated areas the aircraft cannot be operated 

closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure. Since the aircraft will be 

operating at a maximum of 400 feet AGL, the X8-M cannot comply with this 

requirement. 

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the X8-M will only fly over 

private property with the permission of the landowner. The operator will define before 
6

every flight a working area radius and a flight area ceiling, preventing the X8-M to go 

beyond the flight area.

The landowner and the persons who may be on the ground in the flight area will be 

briefed of the expected route of flight and the associated risks to persons and property on 

the ground. Due to the small size of the X8-M and the material with which the X8-M is 

built, the hazard to persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures is not comparable to manned 

aircraft and should be considered in granting the exemption. Moreover, the aircraft will 

not be operated over congested areas or over any open- air assembly of persons. The 

aircraft will be operated at an altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency 

landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface. 

14 CFR 91.121 – Altimeter settings 

This section requires that each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising 

altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that 

is set, when operating below 18,000 feet MSL to: 

The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical 

miles of the aircraft: If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) 

of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; In 

the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or 

an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure. 

To provide an equivalent level of safety, the X8-M autopilot calculates the reference 

altitude (ground level) with the on-board GPS during the pre-flight tests. The GPS and 

barometer data are merged with respect to their respective precisions. The GPS provides 

reliable information to correct potential barometric bias, while rapid variations in altitude 

are detected through the barometer. Hence, barometric bias induced by environmental 

factors is rejected. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions 

The regulation provides that no person may begin a flight in an airplane under day-VFR 

conditions unless there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and to 

fly after that for at least 30 minutes. 

Given the area of operation for the X8-M, HD Mapping believes that an equivalent level 

of safety is achieved with the low battery failsafe feature in which the X8-M will 

automatically land if the battery reaches below a determined point.

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) & (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration 

This regulation provides as follows: 
7

No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has an appropriate and current 

airworthiness certificate. 

No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by 

paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is 

displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew. 

The X8-M weighs only 7.7 pounds. As such, there is no ability or place to carry 

certification and registration documents or to display them on the UAS. In addition, there 

is no pilot or passengers on board the aircraft. 

To obtain an equivalent level of safety and meet the intent of 91.203, HD Mapping

proposes that the documents deemed appropriate for this aircraft by the FAA will be colocated with the operator at the ground control station in the X8-M box and available for 

inspection upon request.

14 CFR Subpart E (91.401 - 91.417) - Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, and 

Alterations 

The regulation requires that the operator is primarily responsible for maintaining the 

aircraft in an airworthy condition, including compliance with Parts 39 and 43. Paragraphs 

91.407 and 91.409 require that the aircraft be "approved for return to service by a person 

authorized under 43.7" after maintenance and inspection. Section 91.409(a)(2) requires 

an annual inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate. Section 91.417(a) 

requires the owner or operator to keep records showing certain maintenance work that 

has been accomplished by certificated mechanics, under Part 43, or licensed pilots and 

records of approval of the aircraft for return to service. 

HD Mapping proposes that the maintenance of the X8-M will be accomplished by the 

owner/operator according to the maintenance manual, provided by 3D Robotics. 

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the X8-M is small in size. It is not 

a complex mechanical device, it will carry no external payload, and it will operate only in 

restricted predetermined areas. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar with 

the aircraft and is best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition and to 

ensure an equivalent level of safety. Finally, before every flight, the X8-M runs automatic

sequences of pre-flight tests to make sure that every sensor and every critical part is 

running properly. Several parts of the X8-M are easily interchangeable (propellers, 

wings), which allows the operator to make sure the wings and propulsion system are 

always airworthy when a mission is initiated. 

The Petitioner has Supplied the Following Additional Information: 

X8-M Operation Manual. 
8

Pre-flight Inspection, Maintenance 

Before each flight, the Pilot In Command, will perform a series of pre-flight and takeoff 

checks as defined by the Operation Manual supplied. After every 60 minutes of airtime, 

the craft will undergo a thorough inspection of all aircraft components, including, but not 

limited to: 

a. Actuators / Servos

b. Motors, wiring and connectors

c. Propellers, smooth, no chips

d. Electronic speed controller, wiring and connectors e. Batteries, wiring and 

connectors

e. Remote command and control

f. Ground control station 

UAS Operating Parameters 

The petitioner states that all flights will be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of 

the pilot. Daytime Visual Flight Rules and all operations will be conducted with the 

assistance of a second spotter/observer. The UAS flights will be limited to a maximum 

altitude of 400 feet AGL. Altitude is accurately measured by the GPS. The petitioner 

further states that an operator will ensure that only consenting production personnel will 

be allowed within 100 feet of the UA operation and UAS will be kept at least 100’ from 

any inhabited structure. Generally, the petitioner’s UAS will be operated in rural or 

suburban areas that will permit significantly larger safety zones. 

Flight Standards District Offices (FSDOs) will be notified as required prior to operations 

to describe intended coordination for proposed operation(s). Petitioner will obtain an Air 

Traffic Organization (“ATO”) issued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (“COA”) 

prior to conducting any operations under this grant of exemption. In fulfilling its 

requirements under the COA, Petitioner will be required to request a NOTAM no more 

than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation.

Petitioner’s UAS will remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned operations 

and activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight vehicles, parachute 

activities, parasailing activities, and hang gliders). Petitioner will not conduct UAS 

operations within 5 nautical miles of the geographic center of a non-towered airport 

unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained and the operation 

is conducted in accordance with a Notice to Airmen (“NOTAM”). 

Pilot in Command (PIC) 

Subsections (a) and (b) of § 61.113 prohibit private pilots from operating aircraft in 

commercial operations and Section 61.133(a) requires an individual operating an aircraft 
9

for compensation or hire to hold a commercial pilot certificate. The FAA has the 

statutory authority to waive the pilot requirements for commercial operations 49 U.S.C. § 

44701(f). Basis for exemption is as follows: AV requests an exemption from 14 C.F.R. 

§§ 61.113(a) and (b) and 14 C.F.R. § 61.133(a) so that the X8-M may be operated by 

individuals who have a private pilot certificate.

Based upon the design features of the X8-M with its autopilot system and safety factors, 

the FAA should permit operation of UASs by operators with a private pilot certificate. 

The conditions described above are in line with those set forth in Volume 16, Chapter 4, 

Section 1 of FAA Order 8900.1.AV proposes to conduct operations in accordance with 

these restrictions. Given these conditions and restrictions, an equivalent level of safety 

will be provided by allowing operation of the X8-M with a private pilot certificate. The 

risks associated with the operation of the X8-M (given its size, speed, operational 

capabilities, and lack of combustible fuel) are much less than the level of risk associated 

with manned operations both private and commercial as contemplated by Part 61; that 

allowing operations of the X8-M, as set forth above, meets or exceeds the present level of 

safety provided under 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113(a) & (b) and 61.133(a). 

Radio Frequencies 

The X8-M will use the 915Mhz frequency, which is allotted by the FCC for data 

transmission and vehicle control in unlicensed frequency bands. All devices used will 

comply with FCC usage and emissions regulations. 

Safety and Benefits of the UAS 

The petitioner will be using the UAS in a variety of applications that generally require 

expensive full-size manned aircraft to complete. Small, light and unmanned aerial 

vehicles offer a myriad of benefits over the use of full-sized manned aircraft such as for 

electric power line inspection, oil/gas pipeline inspection, and film and still photography. 

Manned aircraft that is carrying crew and flammable fuel is being replaced with small 

UAS carrying no passengers or crew creating a greater margin of safety for the pilots and 

crew. 

By granting Petitioner’s requested exemptions, the FAA will help drive development of 

safe and successful commercial UAS operations and will advance the public knowledge 

base for such operations. Petitioner is committed to promoting the UAS research efforts 

of policymakers including the FAA, NASA, DOD and DARPA by sharing data from its 

commercial UAS operations and serving as a resource for future UAS research 

operations. Thus, the FAA has good cause to grant this Petition. 

Conclusion 
10

For reasons stated, the exemptions requested herein should be granted and Petitioner 

should be permitted to conduct small UAS operations in accordance with its manuals and 

all other operating parameters deemed necessary and appropriate by the FAA. 

Respectfully Submitted,

Jonathan Yarger

Member, HD Mapping, LLC. 

P.O. Box 645 Tannersville, NY 12485

518-860-4812 info@hdmapping.com