alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              10,672
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       36,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (2,459)
<INVENTORY>                                         35,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    88,367
<PP&E>                                             216,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (52,812)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     303,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              (71,844)
<BONDS>                                           (190,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (37,552)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      (303,029)
<SALES>                                           (196,600)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  (196,600)
<CGS>                                                6,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      177,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       951
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21,853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (3,353)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (3,353)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (3,353)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10647]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       RIGHT DEAL, NOT FAST DEAL

  (Ms. KAPTUR asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Ms. KAPTUR. Mr. Speaker, as the House approaches a vote on the 
Senate's Wall Street bailout bill, I urge caution to my colleagues. We 
need regular order, not panic. We want the right deal, not a fast deal. 
There is a better way to address the credit crunch facing our banks 
than taxpayers printing money for Wall Street's bad actions. We must 
use the FDIC as we did in the 1980s to resolve thousands of problem 
institutions. In those days, we had over $100 billion worth of 
resolutions that cost but $1.8 billion to the insurance fund, not the 
taxpayer.
  We need to have the Securities and Exchange Commission work with our 
banks on how they account for the real estate on their books not with 
arbitrary indexes and measures, but rather to true value. That would 
unlock billions of dollars, $500 billion in the system today, and would 
ease interbank lending.
  Let's use the right medicine, not a Band-aid through which a 
hemorrhage will soon break as our deficit explodes even more and the 
value of the dollar declines further. Let's have the wisdom and courage 
to do what's right.

                          ____________________
```
# Official Journal C 153/28 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 153 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6628 April 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 153

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6628 April 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 153/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2023 to 31 March 2023(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2023/C 153/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2023 to 31 March 2023(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC, Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 12 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 153/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2023 to 31 March 2023(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2023/C 153/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2023 to 31 March 2023(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC, Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC, Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Michael P. Cifone, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
      ACMAT Corporation; and

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report.


Date:    October 19, 2004
                                                         /s/ Michael P. Cifone
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                       6
Safety Practices Once Tractor Trailer 

Drivers Arrive at a Destination

Safety is just as important once a truck reaches a destination as when it is 

on the open road. Companies should communicate operating procedures 

to keep workers safe, whether at the warehouse, dock, or construction site. 

Drivers should know about hazards that can result in serious or fatal injuries.

 Parking

 Park on level ground and close 

to the receiving door or site

 Set and test brakes

 Place wheel chocks between the 

tandem wheels of the trailer

 Do not attempt to stop a 

rolling vehicle

Backing Up

 Get Out And Look (GOAL)

 Use flashers, horn, and 

backup alarms

 Check both mirrors

 Roll down windows to hear

 Know the vehicle’s blind spots

 Use a spotter

 Back up slowly

 Stand clear when opening doors 

for unloading

 Coupling 

and Uncoupling

 Only trained workers should perform 

this procedure

 Ensure stable footing when releasing 

the fifth wheel or adjusting tandems 

 Wear bright visible clothing 

 Set parking brakes and perform tug test

 Keep clear of tires and frames

 Check for vehicular traffic near you

IMPORTANT SAFETY STEPS WHEN:

For more information, call 800-321-6742 (OSHA) or visit www.osha.gov/SLTC/trucking_industry.

1 2 3

OSHA 3944-04 2018
Order entered September 11, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00915 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF A .M., A MINOR On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 12 - 11107 - U 

### O RDER W e GRANT appellant’s September 9, 2014 motion for extension of time and ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 15, 2014
. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 10(b)20

 

**BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS**

 

**ALABAMA POWER COMPANY**

 

Effective as of March 1, 2009, the following are the annual base salaries of the current Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Alabama Power Company and certain other current or former executive officers of Alabama Power Company who served during 2008.

 

| Charles D. McCrary

President and Chief Executive Officer                                                       | $662,242 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Art P. Beattie

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and 

Treasurer                               | $289,068 |
| C. Alan Martin

Executive Vice President of The Southern Company,

President of Southern Company Services, Inc. | $441,348 |
| Steven R. Spencer

Executive Vice President                                                                     | $379,187 |
| Jerry L. Stewart

Senior Vice President                                                                         | $354,792 |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alabama National BanCorporation
(Alabama National) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John H. Holcomb, III, Chief Executive Officer of Alabama National, and
William E. Matthews, V, Chief Financial Officer of Alabama National, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Alabama National.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 5, 2005



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ John H. Holcomb, III  
|John H. Holcomb, III      
|Chief Executive Officer   
|                          
|/s/ William E. Matthews, V
|William E. Matthews, V    
|Chief Financial Officer
#### Riddle v. Fletcher.

1. Appeal: less tear $100: questions oe eact not determined. This court has jurisdiction to determine only questions of law properly certified for that purpose, in cases involving less than $100; and where the question certified is really one of fact, as in this case, (see opinion,) the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, even though that point is not raised by counsel.

*Appeal from Ida Dislriet Oov/rt.*

Friday, October 7.

This is an ordinary action for the recovery of a commission for the sale by plaintiff of a parcel of real estate for defendant. The district court rendered judgment for the amount claimed, and defendant appeals.

*E.*Willard, for appellant.

*Warren & Buchanan,*for appellee.

*455Reed, J.

The amount involved in this action is but eighty dollars, and the cause came into this court on the certificate of the trial judge to the effect that it involved a question of law upon which the opinion of this court is desired. Plaintiff’s claim is for compensation for service in effecting a sale of real estate for defendant. The business was transacted by the parties by correspondence, and the substance of the several letters which passed between them is set out in the certificate. The question which we are asked to determine is whether, upon the facts of the transaction as shown by the correspondence, defendant is liable to plaintiff for the value of his services in negotiating the sale. But that is clearly a question of fact. Defendant would be liable for the value of the services if he expressly requested plaintiff to render them, or expressly promised to pay. for them, or if they were rendered under such circumstances that a promise to pay for them would be implied. But whether there was an express request or promise is a question of fact, as is also the question whether the services were rendered under such circumstances as that a promise would be implied. Under the statute, therefore, we have no jurisdiction to determine the question certified. This question was not raised by counsel, but, being jurisdictional, the court will take notice of it, even though not raised.

The appeal must be

Dismissed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         543,264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               629,114
<PP&E>                                       4,594,466
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,204,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,852,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          687,908
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,546
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,193,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,852,647
<SALES>                                      1,161,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,161,018
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,548,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (440,956)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.60)
        

</TABLE>
#### john c. McKenzie vs. Alexander little.

The only jurisdiction conferred on this Court in oases at common law is appellate, after a judgment in the Superior Court. Where there has been no such judgment, the cause will not be entertained in this Court.

Case transmitted from Anson Superior Court of Law, at the Spring Term, 1839.

This is an action of debt on an award made on the submission of the intestate Jennings, to which the defendant *46pleaded the general issue. He afterwards pleaded a special plea, since the last continuance, to which the plaintiff demurred. Without any trial of the issue or any judgment on the demurrer, the parties agreed to send the case to this Court for decision on the demurrer, and on certain agreed facts.

No counsel for the plaintiff.

*Winston,*for the defendant.

Ruffin, C. J.

The only jurisdiction conferred on this Court, in cases at eommon law, is appellate, after a judgment in the Superior Court. The present cause, therefore, cannot be entertained ; but the parties must proceed in the case remaining in the Superior Court. Each party will pay his own costs in this Court.

Per Curiam. Judgment accordingly.
EXHIBIT 10(b)17

 

**BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS**

 

**ALABAMA POWER COMPANY**

 

Effective as of March 1, 2008, the following are the annual base salaries of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and certain other executive officers of Alabama Power Company.

 

| Charles D. McCrary

President and Chief Executive Officer                         | $662,242 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Art P. Beattie

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and 

Treasurer | $289,068 |
| C. Alan Martin

Executive Vice President                                          | $441,348 |
| Steven R. Spencer

Executive Vice President                                       | $379,187 |
| Jerry L. Stewart

Senior Vice President                                           | $354,792 |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 167 (Monday, October 20, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10519]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           RECESS UNTIL THURSDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2008, AT 2 P.M.

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 
Senate stands in recess until Thursday, October 23, 2008, at 2 p.m.
  Thereupon, the Senate, at 3 and 35 seconds p.m., recessed until 
Thursday, October 23, 2008, at 2 p.m.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0341 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SAMUEL RICHARD BONKO,

Defendant and Appellant

.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 6, 20 2 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 28 2021

05/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0341
# Requests Report (5)
#### ARCHIBALD McLAUGHLIN *vs.*JOHN J. McLAUGHLIN *et al.*

Where upon the appearance of an insolvent at the County Court, a suggestion of fraud is made, but no specifications are filed in that Court, *Held*that the cause was not in a state to he carried to the Superior Court by appeal, *certiorari*or otherwise.

MotioN for judgment on a *ca. sa.*bond, heard before his Honor Judge Person, at the Special Term of Eobeson Superior Court, May, 1855.

At February term, 1854, of Eobeson County Court, the following is the entry in this case : “ Defendant not allowed to take the oath ; fraud suggested. Transferred to the superior court.” This transfer was intended to be in pursuance of an Act of Assembly passed in 1850, concerning the County Court of Eobeson. There were no specifications of fraud filed in the County Court, but specifications were filed in the Superior Court, at spring term, 1854, and the cause was continued till this term when, the defendant not appearing, a motion was made for judgment by default against him and his sureties. The motion was opposed, on the ground, that the cause had beep sent to the Superior Court prematurely, not having been put at issue ; and his Honor being of that opinion, ordered it to be dismissed, from which j udgment plaintiff appealed.

*320
      *Shepherd,*for plaintiff.

Troy, for defendant.

Battle, J.

The question which has been discussed before us, and decided at the present term in *Thompson*v. *Floyd,*(ante 313) does not arise in this case. Here no issue was, nor as matters then stood, could have been made up when the cause was transferred to the Superior Court. The 10th section of the Revised Statutes ch. 58, entitled “An Act for the relief of insolvent debtors,” provides that when a debtor, after having taken the necessary preliminary steps, applies to the county court for permission to take the benefit of the act, any creditor may suggest fraud : whereupon the court shall direct an issue to be made up and tried by a jury. The Act of 1844, ch. 31, sec. 2, (Ire. Dig. Man. p. 118,) prohibits the court from permitting such an issue to be made up and tried, unless the creditor, his agent or attorney, shall file his suggestions of fraud in writing. .

From the record it appears that no suggestions were filed, and no issue made up until the cause was docketted in the Superior Court. It was not therefore,while in the County Court, in a condition to be taken, to the Superior Court by way of appeal, writ of certiorari, or otherwise, and his Honor did right in dismissing it for want of jurisdiction.

PeR CueiaM. The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.4
 Form of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between
Pension & Benefit Financial Services, Inc. and Ruth M. Roper




---



##### 



PENSION & BENEFIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
  (Ruth M. Roper)
     Employment provided
 1




---



##### 



Compensation
 provided
   Earnings and Distribution of Compensatory Shares; Voting Rights
 Compensatory Shares; Forfeitures
 General Rules
 Exception for Terminations Due to Death or Disability
 Exception for a Change in Control
 2




---



##### 



Discretionary Acceleration of Vesting
 Accrual of Dividends
 Distribution of Compensatory Shares
 Timing of Distributions
 Form of Distribution
 3




---



##### 



Acquisition for Investment
 Unregistered Securities
 4




---



##### 



Voting of Compensatory Shares
 Discretionary Bonuses
 Participation in Retirement, Medical and Other Plans
   Term
 5




---



##### 



Loyalty; Full Time and Attention
   Standards
 Vacation and Sick Leave
    6




---



##### 



Termination and Termination Pay
 Death
 Disability
 For Cause
 7




---



##### 



Without Cause
 Voluntary Termination by Employee
 Change in Control
   8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



Requirements of Applicable Regulations of OTS
         10




---



##### 



Non-Solicitation of Employees
 No Mitigation
 Successors and Assigns
   Alternative Dispute Resolution
    11




---



##### 



Amendments
 Applicable Law
 Severability
 Entire Agreement
 12




---



##### 



ATTEST:
    
    
    
    PENSION & BENEFIT FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC.By:Secretary
    
    
    
    J. Malcomb Massey
President and Chief Executive OfficerWitness:
    
    
    
    Ruth M. Roper (Employee)
 13