Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices 88953 

5Commerce has found the following companies 

to be cross-owned with OCP S.A.: Jorf Fertilizers 

Company I; Jorf Fertilizers Company II; Jorf 

Fertilizers Company III; Jorf Fertilizers Company IV; 

Jorf Fertilizers Company V; and OCP Nutricrops 

S.A. 

1See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

Continued 

the subsidy calculations for OCP. These 

changes are explained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an 

individual net countervailable subsidy 

rate for OCP. Commerce determines 

that, during the POR, the net 

countervailable subsidy rate for the 

company under review is as follows: 

Company Subsidy rate 

(percent ad valorem) 

OCP S.A. 5 ............ 16.81 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results of review within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rate 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review, for the 

above-listed company at the applicable 

ad valorem assessment rate. We intend 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

no earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed with the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Rates 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amount shown for OCP on shipments of 

the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse for 

consumption, on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review. The cash deposit 

requirement, effective upon the 

publication of the final results of this 

review, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Timely written notification of the 

return/destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These final results are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: November 5, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Subsidies Valuation 

V. Analysis of Programs 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Can Seek 

Information Regarding Previously 

Investigated Programs That Commerce 

Found Conferred No Benefit and ‘‘Other 

Assistance’’ Provided by the GOM 

Comment 2A: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise the Phosphate Rock Benchmark 

for the Provision of Phosphate Mining 

Rights for Less Than Adequate 

Remuneration (LTAR) Program 

Comment 2B: Whether Commerce Should 

Include Headquarters (HQ), Support, and 

Debt Costs in the Costs of Producing 

Phosphate Rock for the Benchmark for 

the Provision of Phosphate Mining 

Rights for LTAR Program 

Comment 2C: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise the Methodology for the 

Calculation of OCP’s Profit Rate Used in 

its Valuation of OCP’s Phosphate Rock 

Comment 3A: Whether Certain of OCP’s 

Land Purchases Provided a Financial 

Contribution from the GOM 

Comment 3B: Whether the Provision of 

Land for LTAR is Specific 

Comment 3C: Whether Commerce Should 

Include Certain Land Transactions in the 

Benchmark Calculation for the Provision 

of Land for LTAR 

Comment 3D: Whether Commerce Should 

Include OCP’s Land Transactions Subject 

to Ongoing Judicial Proceedings in the 

Benefit Calculation for the Provision of 

Land for LTAR 

Comment 3E: Whether Commerce Should 

Correct Arithmetical Errors in the 

Provision of Land for LTAR Calculation 

of Benefit 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Include Transactions from Countries 

with Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with 

Morocco in OCP’s Benefit Calculation for 

the Customs Duty Exemptions for Capital 

Goods, Machinery, and Equipment 

Program 

Comment 5: Whether the Provision of Port 

Services and Infrastructure for LTAR 

Program Provided a Countervailable 

Benefit to OCP During the POR 

Comment 6: Whether Marsa Maroc’s 

Provision of Port and Vessel Services is 

Consistent with Market Principles 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Make Certain Changes to its Cash 

Deposit Instructions 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–26178 Filed 11–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–106] 

Wooden Cabinet and Vanities and 

Components Thereof From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Partial Rescission of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

and The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. 

(Ancientree) and Jiangsu Weisen 

Houseware Co., Ltd. (Weisen) did not 

make sales of wooden cabinets and 

vanities and components thereof 

(cabinets) at prices below normal value 

during the period of review (POR) April 

1, 2022, through March 31, 2023. 

DATES: Applicable November 12, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Garry Kasparov or Hermes Pinilla, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1397 or (202) 482–3477, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 2, 2024, Commerce published 

in the Federal Register the Preliminary 

Results of the antidumping duty 

administrative review and invited 

interested parties to comment.1 On July 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
88954 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices 

China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments, and Partial 

Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 35785 (May 2, 2024) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated August 8, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China; 2022– 

2023,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 5See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: Antidumping Duty Order, 85 FR 22126 

(April 21, 2020) (Order). 6See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the 

Republic of Korea: Rescission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 24758 

(April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy 

Steel Cut-to Length Plate from the Federal Republic 

of Germany: Recission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 4157 

(January 24, 2023); and Lightweight Thermal Paper 

from Japan: Rescission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 18373 

(March 13, 2024). 

7See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

8See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

9See Commerce’s Memorandum, ‘‘U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) Data release,’’ dated 

June 20, 2023. 

10See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

11See Appendix II. 

12See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 4. 

13See Preliminary Results, 89 FR 35785. 

22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.2 On August 

8, 2024, Commerce extended the 

deadline for issuing the final results in 

this review to November 5, 2024.3

For a complete description of the 

events that occurred since Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 5

The products covered by this Order 

are wooden cabinets and vanities For 

full description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is 

Commerce’s practice to rescind an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order when there are 

no reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR for which 

liquidation is suspended.6 Normally, 

upon completion of an administrative 

review, the suspended entries are 

liquidated at the antidumping duty 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.7 Therefore, for an 

administrative review to be conducted, 

there must be a reviewable, suspended 

entry that Commerce can instruct CBP 

to liquidate at the antidumping duty 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.8 Commerce found during 

this administrative review that, for 

certain companies listed in the in the 

Initiation Notice, there were no 

reviewable entries during the POR.9 As 

a result, in the absence of suspended 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR, we are hereby rescinding this 

administrative review for certain 

companies listed in appendix IV of this 

notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3). 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the parties’ briefs 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the issues 

addressed is included as appendix I to 

this notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes From the Preliminary Results 

Based on our review and analysis of 

the comments received, we made 

changes to the Preliminary Results. For 

a more detailed discussion of the issues 

raised by parties, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.10

Rates for Non-Examined Separate Rate 

Respondents 

Commerce determines that 18 

companies, not individually examined, 

are eligible for separate rates in this 

administrative review.11 The Act and 

Commerce’s regulations do not address 

the establishment of a separate rate to be 

applied to companies not selected for 

individual examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for separate rate 

respondents which Commerce did not 

examine individually in an 

administrative review. For the final 

results of this review, Commerce 

determined the estimated dumping 

margins for Ancientree and Weisen to 

be zero. For the reasons explained in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, we 

are assigning this rate to the nonexamined respondents which qualify for 

a separate rate in this review.12

China-Wide Entity 

As stated in the Preliminary Results, 

because no party requested a review of 

the China-wide entity is not under 

review and the China-wide entity’s rate, 

i.e., 251.64 percent, is not subject to 

change.13 Commerce considers all other 

companies, listed in appendix III of this 

notice, for which a review was 

requested, and which did not 

demonstrate separate rate eligibility, to 

be part of the China-wide entity, 

including Jiangsu Sunwell Cabinetry 

Co., Ltd. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margin exists for the 

administrative review covering the 

period April 1, 2022, through March 31, 

2023: 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Jiangsu Weisen Houseware Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 0.00 

The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................. 0.00 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review Receiving a Separate Rate 14 ................................................................................... 0.00 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices 88955 

14See Appendix II. 

15See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 4. 

16See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

38021 (June 12, 2023) (‘‘All firms listed below that 

wish to qualify for separate rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME countries 

must complete, as appropriate, either a Separate 

Rate Application or Certification, as described 

below.’’). 

17See Order, 85 FR at 22126. 

18See Cargo System Messaging Service 

#59384253, dated 02/12/2024; see also, 

Announcing an Importer’s Additional Declaration 

in the Automated Commercial Environment 

Specific to Antidumping/Countervailing Duty 

Certifications, 89 FR 7372 (February 2, 2024). 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce discloses to 

interested parties the calculations of the 

final results of an administrative review 

within five days of a public 

announcement or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days of the 

date of publication of the notice of final 

results in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

However, because we have made no 

changes to Ancientree’s and Weisen’s 

margin calculations from the 

Preliminary Results, there are no 

calculations to disclose. 

Assessment 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protections (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for Ancientree, 

and Weisen, we calculated importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment 

rates based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for each 

importer’s examined sales and the total 

entered value of the sales. Where an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent), the entries by that importer 

will be liquidated without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

For all non-selected separate rate 

applicants subject to this review, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate all entries 

of subject merchandise that entered the 

United States during the POR at the 

average of the rates calculated for 

Ancientree and Weisen as listed 

above.15 For entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Ancientree and Weisen for which 

they did not know their merchandise 

was destined for the United States, we 

intend to instruct CBP to liquidate such 

entries at the China-wide rate if there is 

no rate for the intermediate company or 

companies involved in the transaction. 

For the companies for which the 

review is rescinded, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

rate as entered. For all other companies, 

we will instruct CBP to apply the 

antidumping duty assessment rate of the 

China-wide entity, 251.64 percent, to all 

entries of subject merchandise exported 

by these companies.16

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

subject to this review will be the rate 

established in these final results of the 

review; (2) for previously investigated or 

reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese 

exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which they were reviewed; (3) for all 

Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the China-wide entity (i.e., 251.64 

percent); and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter.17 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Certification 

Following the publication of this 

notice, the importer, or the importer’s 

agent, must continue to submit any 

required certifications to CBP as part of 

the entry process by uploading them 

into the document imaging system in 

CBP’s Automated Commercial 

Environment at the time of entry 

summary filing. Consistent with CBP’s 

procedures, importers shall also identify 

entries required to have certifications by 

using importers’ additional declaration 

(record 54) AD/CVD Certification 

Designation (type code 06) when filing 

entry summary.18

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties has occurred and 

the subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: November 5, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes from the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
88956 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices 

1See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Steel 

Wire Garment Hangers from the People’s Republic 

of China, 73 FR 58111 (October 6, 2008) (Order). 2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 89 

FR 54435 (July 1, 2024). 3See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Notice 

of Intent to Participate,’’ dated July 10, 2024. 4See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, 

‘‘Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ 

dated July 18, 2024. 5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Review for July 

2024,’’ dated August 21, 2024. 6See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 7See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Rely on Adverse Facts Available (AFA) 

to Determine a Margin for Ancientree 

Comment 2: Surrogate Country Selection 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Find That Jiangsu Sunwell Cabinetry 

Co., Ltd. (Sunwell) Has Rebutted the 

Presumption of Government Control. 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise the Calculation of the Separate 

Rate in the Final Results. 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Rescind the Review for All Companies 

That Have No Unliquidated Type 03 

Entries as Reflected in the U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) Data. 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Determine Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime 

Furniture Co., Ltd. (Bedtime) Has No 

Shipments. 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

Receiving a Separate Rate 

1. Fujian Dushi Wooden Industry Co., Ltd. 

2. Fujian Leifeng Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

3. Fuzhou CBM Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. 

4. Goldenhome Living Co., Ltd. 

5. Honsoar New Building Material Co., Ltd. 

6. Jiangsu Beichen Wood Co., Ltd. 

7. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

8. Nantong Aershin Cabinets Co., Ltd. 

9. Qingdao Shousheng Industry Co., Ltd. 

10. Senke Manufacturing Company 

11. Shanghai Zifeng International Trading 

Co., Ltd. 

12. Shouguang Fushi Wood Co., Ltd. 

13. Taishan Hongxiang Trading Co., Ltd. 

14. Taishan Oversea Trading Co., Ltd. 

15. Taizhou Overseas Int’l Ltd. 

16. Xiamen Adler Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

17. Xiamen Golden Huanan Imp & Exp Co., 

Ltd. 

18. Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. 

(formally known as Yixing Pengjia 

Cabinetry Co., Ltd.) 

Appendix III 

Companies Determined To Be Part of the 

China-Wide Entity 

1. Deqing Meisheng Import and Export Co., 

Ltd. 

2. Fujian Senyi Kitchen Cabinet Co., Ltd. 

3. Fuzhou Hauster Kitchen Cabinet 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

4. Fuzhou Pyrashine Trading Co., Ltd. 

5. Jiang Su Rongxin Import and Export Co., 

Ltd. 

6. Jiangsu Sunwell Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

7. Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime Furniture Co., 

Ltd. 

8. Linshu Meibang Furniture Co., Ltd. 

9. Linyi Bomei Furniture Co., Ltd. 

10. Qufu Xinyu Furniture Co., Ltd. 

11. Shanghai Beautystar Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

12. Shanghai Zifeng Industries Development 

Co., Ltd. 

13. Shenzhen Pengchengzhirong Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

14. Xiamen Got Cheer Co., Ltd. 

15. Yichun Dongmeng Wood Co., Ltd. 

16. Yindu Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. 

17. ZBOM Cabinets Co., Ltd. 

18. Zaozhuang New Sharp Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. 

19. Zhongshan KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

Appendix IV 

Companies for Which the Review Is 

Rescinded 

1. Anhui Xinyuanda Cupboard Co., Ltd. 

2. Changyi Zhengzheng Woodwork Co., 

3. Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd. 

4. Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. 

5. Dongguan Ri Sheng Home Furnishing 

Articles Co., Ltd. 

6. Guangzhou Nuolande Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

7. Hangzhou Hoca Kitchen & Bath Products 

Co., Ltd. 

8. Jiang Su Rongxin Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

(Formerly known as Jiang Su Rongxin 

Cabinets Ltd.) 

9. Kunshan Baiyulan Furniture Co., Ltd. 

10. Linyi Kaipu Furniture Co., Ltd. 

11. Morewood Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

12. Pizhou Ouyme Import & Export Trade 

Co., Ltd. 

13. Quanzhou Ample Furnishings Co., Ltd. 

14. Shandong Jinhua Wood Co., Ltd. 

15. Shandong Longsen Woods Co., Ltd. 

16. Sheen Lead International Trading 

(Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

17. Suzhou Siemo Wood Import & Export 

Co., Ltd. 

18. Tech Forest Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

19. Weifang Fuxing Wood Co., Ltd. 

20. Weifang Yuanlin Woodware Co., Ltd. 

21. Weihai Jarlin Cabinetry Manufacture Co., 

Ltd. 

22. Xuzhou Yihe Wood Co., Ltd. 

23. Zhangzhou OCA Furniture Co., Ltd. 

24. Zhongshan NU Furniture Co., Ltd. 

25. Zhoushan For-Strong Wood Co. 

[FR Doc. 2024–26174 Filed 11–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–918] 

Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Expedited Third Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on steel wire garment 

hangers (steel hangers) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable November 12, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kabir Archuletta, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2953. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 6, 2008, Commerce 

published the AD Order on steel 

hangers from China.1 On July 1, 2024, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the five-year sunset review 

of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act).2 On July 10, 2024, Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

in this review from M&B Metal Products 

Company, Inc. (the domestic interested 

party) within the deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic 

interested party claimed interested party 

status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act 

as a manufacturer, producer, or 

wholesaler of a domestic like product in 

the United States. 

On July 18, 2024, the domestic 

interested party provided a timely 

substantive response for this review 

within the 30-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received 

no substantive responses from any other 

interested parties, nor was a hearing 

requested. On August 21, 2024, 

Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that it did not receive an adequate 

substantive response from respondent 

interested parties.5 As a result, pursuant 

to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of this Order. On July 22, 

2024, Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.6 The 

deadline for the final results is now 

November 5, 2024. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to this Order 

is steel hangers. For a complete 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.7


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES