alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         378,167
<SECURITIES>                                   595,381
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,125,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,431
<INVENTORY>                                     98,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,149,450
<PP&E>                                         757,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                 654,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,619,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,222,084
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,982,842
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,584,959)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,619,967
<SALES>                                      2,056,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,056,750
<CGS>                                          312,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  681,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,277,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                105,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            105,784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   105,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10(c)25

 

**BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS**

 

**GEORGIA POWER COMPANY**

 

Effective as of March 1, 2009, the following are the annual base salaries of the current Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Georgia Power Company and certain other current or former executive officers of Georgia Power Company who served as such during 2008.

 

| Michael D. Garrett

President and Chief Executive Officer                                                   | $695,402 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Cliff S. Thrasher

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                          | $296,484 |
| Christopher C. Womack

Executive Vice President of The Southern Company and Southern Company Services, Inc. | $363,651 |
| James H. Miller, III

President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.     | $455,803 |
| Mickey A. Brown

Executive Vice President                                                                   | $363,253 |
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00572

- CR

JESUS ALEJANDRO RODR IGUEZ

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2012

- DCR

- 1221

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consider ed this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 22, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS LEGEND CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF FISCAL 1997 CONTAINED IN THE
COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-25-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1997
<CASH>                                       2,070,426
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,766,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (450,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,417,578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,167,246
<PP&E>                                       2,906,218
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,024,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,050,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,993,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       257,820
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,110,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,050,075
<SALES>                                      6,461,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,025,466
<CGS>                                        4,911,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,122,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,374,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               191,286
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,533,169
<INCOME-TAX>                                   643,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            890,169
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   890,169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Record Steel and Construction, Inc.

 dba RSCI

)

)

ASBCA No. 63563

)

Under Contract No. W912BV-19-C-0002 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Tyler J. Anderson, Esq.

 Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP

 Boise, ID

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Lauren M. Williams, Esq.

Thomas E. Rogers, V, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorneys

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Tulsa

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 24, 2024

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63563, Appeal of Record 

Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCI, rendered in conformance with the Board’s 

Charter.

Dated: June 24, 2024

REBA PAGE

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RM01-5-000]

Take notice that the final set of codes and tables for the November 25, 2024, deployment are posted at the same eLibrary Accession Number as this Notice. The following are the changes to filing-type codes since the September 30, 2024, Notice.

Code 1090—Non-Jurisdictional filing Amendment—Changed to compliance type.

The following new ALJ Settlement Codes have been added to accommodate settlement filings, such as settlements of complaints, for which the filer does not have an existing docket number with an associated filing identifier.

Code 1385—ALJ Settlement—new docket

Code 1395—ALJ Settlement—new docket

Code 1405—ALJ Settlement—new docket

Code 1415—ALJ Settlement—new docket

Code 1425—ALJ Settlement—new docket

                    These revisions will not be available in the test sandbox at                     *https://etariff.ferc.gov/​TariffSandbox2.aspx.*

                    Questions on these changes should be directed to: Michael Goldenberg at                     *Michael.Goldenberg@ferc.gov*                     or James Sarikas at                     *James.Sarikas@ferc.gov.*

Dated: October 31, 2024.

Carlos D. Clay,

Acting Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-25850 Filed 11-6-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2262]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      HONORING RYAN MICHAEL CURTIS

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. SAM GRAVES

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. GRAVES. Madam Speaker, I proudly pause to recognize Ryan Michael 
Curtis of Kansas City, Missouri. Ryan is a very special young man who 
has exemplified the finest qualities of citizenship and leadership by 
taking an active part in the Boy Scouts of America, Troop 1247, and 
earning the most prestigious award of Eagle Scout.
  Ryan has been very active with his troop, participating in many Scout 
activities. Over the many years Ryan has been involved with Scouting, 
he has not only earned numerous merit badges, but also the respect of 
his family, peers, and community.
  Madam Speaker, I proudly ask you to join me in commending Ryan 
Michael Curtis for his accomplishments with the Boy Scouts of America 
and for his efforts put forth in achieving the highest distinction of 
Eagle Scout.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Embratel Participações S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 14, 2006



/s/ Carlos Henrique MoreiraName:

Carlos Henrique MoreiraTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


Date: July 14, 2006



/s/ Isaac BerensztejnName:

Isaac BerensztejnTitle:

Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer
#### William Reichard, Jr., Plaintiff, v Palma Reichard, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Queens County,

March 8, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Black & Brownstein (Walter Black*of counsel), for defendant. *Gusmorino & Marx*for plaintiff.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sidney Leviss, J.

This is a postdivorce motion by defendant to (1) modify the judgment of divorce obtained on movant’s default on March 12, 1982 by "equitably distributing the marital property of the parties”, (2) enjoin plaintiff from transferring assets including the former marital premises and (3) disclose assets.

In March 1981 plaintiff instituted an action for divorce by service of a summons with notice. A notice of appearance was served in April and in September a verified complaint was served. Defendant wife commenced a separate action for divorce in June 1981 in which the instant plaintiff served a *1014notice of appearance. Neither side requested equitable distribution. The assets at issue here are the former marital premises which is in plaintiffs name and plaintiffs pension. Defendant’s action was not prosecuted. No answer was served in plaintiffs action, which was processed as an uncontested matrimonial, referred to a Referee and a judgment entered on March 12, 1983 based on the Referee’s report.

It should be noted that this motion, made five years later, is not one to vacate defendant’s default. *(See, Imbriale v Imbriale,*102 AD2d 881.) Even were the court to deem it so, defendant offers no sufficient basis for vacatur stating only that she was unaware of the progress of plaintiffs divorce action and even unaware that her attorney had instituted an action for divorce on her behalf or had written plaintiffs attorney outlining the terms of a settlement which was the basis for the March 12 judgment. Finally, although movant states that she was not served with the judgment of divorce there is proof that plaintiff was at least served with the proposed judgment.

Instead movant appears to argue that since neither side put the issue before the court, equitable distribution can still be sought. The court does not agree. Neither Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (5) (a) nor the comment in *Boronow v Boronow*(71 NY2d 284, 287), citing the statute, that division of marital property under preequitable distribution laws could remain unresolved "in a manner not permissible today” casts on the court an independent and continuing duty to equitably distribute assets under the particular circumstances of the instant case. *McKoy v McKoy*(120 Misc 2d 83) does not help defendant since in her own action she did not request such ancillary relief. Nor does *Imbriale v Imbriale (supra)*require a different result since the instant judgment unlike *Imbriale*provided for exclusive possession of the marital premises by defendant until the youngest child was 18 years old (which has occurred) and further directed plaintiff to pay the mortgage, taxes, insurance, utilities, etc.

Finally, having accepted the benefits of the judgment for over five years, there is no basis on which to vacate or modify it.

Accordingly, the motion is denied.
Summary of Phone Conversations with the San Diego Air Pollution Control District Prepared by Nicole Law April 24, 2013

Phone conversation between Nicole Law (EPA) and Natalie Yates (SDAPCD ) on April 9, 2011

. Nicole asked Natalie about the averaging provision in the rule. Natalie confirmed the averaging provision is no longer in use. She also confirmed the annual reporting in the rule ended when the averaging provision ended. Natalie explained the district has drafted a new rule based on CARB’s 200 7 SCM and will have a workshop in about a month.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 869

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 2000

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Mina Vahedi Notash.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 869 RFH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MINA

2 VAHEDI NOTASH.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

4 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

5 Act, Mina Vahedi Notash shall be eligible for issuance of

6 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of

7 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon

8 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa

9 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status

10 to lawful permanent resident.

11 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Mina Vahedi

12 Notash enters the United States before the filing deadline

13 specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered

14 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other15 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under

16 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

17 the date of the enactment of this Act.

18 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

19 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap20 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica21 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

22 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

23 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

24 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res25 idence to Mina Vahedi Notash, the Secretary of State shall

26 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 4, during the cur-
3

S 869 RFH

1 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im2 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the

3 country of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the

4 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

5 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

6 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

7 202(e) of such Act.

Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day,

September 22), 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Mark J. Thomas, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Servidyne, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: July 19, 2007 /s/ Mark J. Thomas   Mark J. Thomas   Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE>



ACCESS CORPORATION
CALCULATION OF NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
<CAPTION>

                                        YEAR ENDED APRIL 30
<S>                                  <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>          <C>
                                     __________________________________________________________
                                     1994        1995       1996       1997         1998
                                                         
                                     __________________________________________________________
Net earnings (loss) applicable to
Basic and Dilutive Common Shares
Net earnings (loss)                  ($615,239)  $129,370   $205,021   ($1,050,732) ($811,985) 
 


Preferred Dividend                              ($ 64,685) ($102,510)

                                                
Net earnings (loss) applicable to
Basic and Dilutive Common Shares
After   Preferred Dividend           ($615,239)  $ 64,685   $102,511   ($1,050,732) ($811,985)
                                      _________   _______    _______    __________   _________

Calculation of Basic and Dilutive
net earnings (loss) per Common Share:

 Average number of Common Shares
 outstanding;                        4,865,559    4,865,559 4,865,559    4,865,559  4,865,559
                                     _________    _________ __________   _________  __________

Net earnings (loss) per Basic 
And Dilutive Common Shares             ( $0.13)       $0.01     $0.02       ($0.22)    ($0.17)







</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions
Corp. (the Managing Owner), of Diversified Futures Trust I (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer                                       
|Kenneth A. Shewer Co-Chief Executive
Officer August 14, 2006