P. 1


# OAR Box 1846 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 12 ) ll-B-9 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 7

Printed 11/18/20087:30:14 AM Sheet 12 of 93v * . 

# ,:.. v r"



### MA RI h U N 

### I2P 2

MEMORANDU

M P. 2

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

### Jli | APR - I I99 2 OFFIC E O F AI R AN O RADIATIO N U •P AAS R DOCKE T SUBJECT : FROM : TO : THRU : Developmen t o f Cos t Estimate s o f Fuel s and Fue l Additive s

Registratio n ProgramRequirement s Sher i L . Dunatchik , Environmenta l Enginee r Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h Docke t A-90-0 7 Jud yGray , Projec t Manage r Standard s Developmen t a n Glenn W . Passavant , Sehiro f Projec t Manage r Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h (j j ic^AJM*^ Th e purpos e o f thi s memorandu m i s t o provid e informatio n showing ho wcos t estimate s i n th e RegulatorySuppor t Documen t wer e developed . Th e firs t attachmen t provide s estimate d cos t dat a specifi c t o eac h registratio n requirement , includin g cost s o f dat a researc h an

d analysis , emissio n characterization , emissio n generation , an

d biologica l testing . Attachmen t 2 provide s a summaryo f estimate d cost s fo r eac h Tier . Containe d i n th e thir d attachmen t ar e cos t estimate s applicabl e t o eac h category(fue l famil yX formulatio n class ) o f products . Thes e estimate s ar e base d o n broa d judgement s regardin g th e probabl e testin g neede d fo r thos e product s likel yt o b e sorte d int o eac h category . Th e individua l cost s wer e develope d a fe wmonth s prio r t o publicatio n o f th e NPRM . Sinc e tha t time , mino r revision s wer e mad e t o some o f th e propose d programprovisions . Fo r example , th e categorizatio n o f product s fo r purpose s o f th e cos t analysi s assume d an oxyge n conten t o f tw o percen t woul d functio n a s th e cut of f poin t betwee n product s i n th e baselin e and non-baselin e formulatio n classes . However , th e curren t proposa l present s tw o differen t alternative s fo r distinguishin g baselin e fromnon baselin e products : an oxyge n conten t o f 1. 5 percen t i n th e firs t alternativ e an

d 2. 7 percen t i n th e second alternative . Furthermore , sinc e th e cos t estimate s wer e developed , th e propose d dat a modelin g requirement s i n Tie r 1 wer e increased , an d some o f th e propose d Tie r 2 healt h effect s tes t guideline s wer e modifie d slightly . Unfortunately , th e cos t estimate s coul d no t b e update d t o reflec t thes e lat e changes , an d thus , mayno t b e entirel y representativ e o f th e requirement s a s no wproposed . Nevertheless , th e cos t estimate s ar e no t overl ysensitiv e t o thes e change s an d th e overal l cost s ar e reasonabl yaccurat e t o th e degre e o fP. 3

precisio n o f th e individua l cos t estimate s and judgement s use d t o asses s th e overal l economi c impact . Attachment s



# JP. 4

V , >



### Attachmen t 1 Cost s pe r Requiremen tP. 5 *;
. •I.TIo r1 Costs A
. Tie r1 : Data Researc h an d Analysi s

1
. Literature Searc h Contractor : hours :

dollars/hr : Contr
. Cost : Data Services:hours :

dollars/hr : Serv
. Cost : Tota l Cost o

fLit
. Searc h 2
. Modelin g Contractor : hours :

dollars/hr : Contr
. Cost : Tota l Modelin g Costs Tota l Cost o

fData Research/Analysis : B
. Tie r1 : Emissio n Characterizatio n

1
. Vehicl e Requirements 20 0 5 0 1000 0 12 5 2 0 250 0 1250 0 8 0 5 0 400 0 400 0 1650 0
a.Vehicl e Acquisition , Operatin g Costs i
. Light-Dut

y NonAtypical

Cost cost/mile: * 0.2 7

miles : 2500 0 Tota l Cost : 675 0 Atypical Cost Minimum : cost/mile :

miles : Tota l Cost : 

### 0.2 7

2500 0 675 0 Avg. : (use d i n analysis ) cost/mile :

miles : Tota l Cost : 0.2 7

5000 0 (50 % ofUL

) 1350 0 Maximum : cost/mile :

miles : Tota l Cost : 0.2 7

8000 0 (80 % o

fUL ) 2160 0 'Cos t include s fuel , maint. , tires , depreciation , etc . (depreciatio n include s vehicl e acquisitio n minu s resal e value )

ii
. Heav yHeavy-Dut

yEngin e Acquisitio n Cost 1300 0P. 6
Non Atypical Cost Atypical CosfMinimum : Avg. : (use d i n analysis ) Maximum :
NonAtypical

Cost Atypical CosfMinimum : Avg. : (us e fo ranalysis ) Maximum : Maintenance Cost : cost/mile : miles: * Tota l Cost :

Fue l Cost : cost/mile :

miles : Tota l Cost : cost/mile : miles : Tota l Cost : cost/mile : miles : Tota l Cost :

* * cost/mile : miles : Tota l Cost : cost/mile : miles : Tota l Cost : cost/mile : miles : Tota l Cost : cost/mile : miles : Tota l Cost : Salvag e Value : NonAtypical

Cost at 25,00 0 miles : Atypical Cost a

t 145,00 0 miles : 0.0 3 2500 0 75 0 0.0 3 2500 0 75 0 0.0 3 14500 0 (50 % o

fUL ) 435 0 0.0 3 23200 0 (80 % ofUL

) 696 0
0.1 3 2500 0 325 0 0.1 3 2500 0 325 0 0.1 3 14500 0 1885 0 0.1 3 23200 0 3016 0 900 0 450 0 'Approximat e mileag e fo rrelate d hour s o fengin e operation
. "Fue l cost : assum e $0.90/gallon , an d 7 mpg .

b
. Mileag e Accumulatio n i
. Light-Dut

y(vi a tes t track)P. 7
NonAtypical

Cost Atypical CosfMinimum : Avg. : (use d i n analysis ) Maximum : cost/mile : miles : Tota l Cost : cost/mile : miles : Tota l Cost : cost/mile : miles : Tota l Cost : cost/mile : miles : Tota l Cost : 1

2500 0 2500 0 1 2500 0 2500 0 1 5000 0 5000 0 1 8000 0 8000 0

ii
. Heavy-Dut

y (Assum e mile s accumulate d vi a engin e dynomometer ) NonAtypical

Cost cost/hour : 3 0

hours : 44 8 (~ 25,00 0 miles ) Tota l Cost : 13440 Atypical CosfMinimum : cost/hour :

hours : Tota l Cost : 3 0

44 8 ( ~ 25,00 0 miles ) 13440 Avg. : cost/hour : (use d i n analysis ) hours* :

Tota l Cost : 3 0

260 0 (-145,00 0 miles ) 7800 0 Maximum : cost/hour : 3 0

hours : 416 0 ( ~ 232,00 0 miles ) Tota l Cost : 12480 0 *Vehicl e accumulate s 110,00 0 mile s pe ryear(55mp h x8hr/da yx 5day/w k x5 0 wk/yr)
. Usefu l lif e = 290,00 0 miles
. Thus , U L - 2. 6 year

s (290,000/110,000)
. Engin e operate s 200 0 hours/y r (4 0 hr/w k x5 0 weeks)
. Assum e mile s accumulate d t o 50 % ofusefu l life , o r1. 3 yrs (2. 6 x50%)
. Therefore , tota l hour s o frunnin g engin e i s 2,60 0 (2000hrs/y rx1. 3 yrs)
. 2
. Generation/Speciatio nP. 8

a . Combustio n i
. Light-Dut y(Assum e 1 vehicle , 3 cycles/vehicle , 3 bags/cycle ; also , collectio n

i n 3 tedla rbag s an d 3 filter s fo rparticulate ) 1.HC/Ethers , Aldehydes/Ketones , Alcohols , Regulate d Emission s a . Generatio n (LA- 4 + 505 )

Cost : 60 0 b
. Speciatio n of : Cost : HC/Ethers :

Ald./Ket. : Alcohols : Regulateds : Tota l Cost/Cycle : Numbe ro fCycles : 130 0 45 0 40 0 20 0 295 0 3 Tota l LD V HC,ALD,ALC,RE G Gen/Spec
. Costs : 885 0 2.PAH , NPA H a . Generation(LA- 4 + 505 )

Cost : 70 0 b
. Speciatio n of : Cost : PAH : 420 0

NPAH : 120 0 Tota l Cost/Cycle : 610 0 Numbe ro fCycles : 3 Tota l LD V PAH , NPA H Gen/Spec
. Costs : 1830 0 3.Atypica l Element s a . Generation(LA- 4 + 505 ) Assum e 2 generations/speciation s necessary . Firs t gen/spe cwit h 1
. a above , secon d conducte d a t stead ystate .

cost/gen. : 700 no . o fgen : 1 Tota l Cost : 700 b
. Speciatio n

cost/spec : no . o fsp. : Tota l Cost : 135 0

2 270 0 Tota l LD V Atypica l Elemen t Gen/Spec
. Cost : 340 0 Tota l Combustio n Emissio n Generation/Speciatio n fo rLDV : 3Q5J5 0P. 9
Heavy-Dut

y(Assum e 1 engine , 3 cycles/engine , 2 bags/cycle ; also , collectio n i n 2 tedla rbag s an d 3 filters fo rpart. ) 1.HC/Ethers , Aldehydes/Ketones , Alcohols , Regulate d Emission s a . Generatio n (Transient)

Cost : 800 0 b
. Speciatio n of : Cost : HC/Ethers :

Ald./Ket. : Alcohols : Regulateds : Tota l Cost/Cycle : Numbe ro fCycles : 1300

45 0 40 0 50 0 1065 0 3 Tota l HC.ALD.ALC.RE G Gen/Spec
. Costs : 

### 3195 0 2.PAH , NPA H a . Generation(Transient )

Cost : 800 0 b
. Speciatio n of : Cost : PAH :

NPAH : 420 0

120 0 Tota l Cost/Cycle : Numbe ro fCycles : 1340 0 3 Tota l PAH , NPA H Gen/Spec
. Costs : 4020 0 3.Atypica l Elements a . Generation(Transient ) Assum e 2 generations/speciation s necessary . First gen/spe cwit h 1
. a above , secon d conducte d a t stead ystate . cost/gen. : 800 0 no . o fgen : 1 Tota l Cost : 800 0 b
. Speciatio n cost/spec : no . o fsp. : Tota l Cost : 135 0

2 270 0 Tota l Atypica l Elemen t Gen/Spec
. Cost : Tota l Combustio n Emissio n Generation/Speciatio n fo rHHDE : 1070 0 8285 0P.1 0

b.Evaporative Emissio n Generation/Speciatio n - LDV Onl y i
. Generatio n (SHED )

Cost : 50 0 ii
. Speciatio n of : Cost : HC : 70 0

Alcohols : 20 0 Tota l Gen/Spe cCost/Test : 140 0 Numbe ro fTests : 3 Tota l Evaporative Emissio n Generation/Speciatio n : 4j|Q Q

II.TIer 2 A
. Emissio n Generatio n

Combu^iojnXconti.nuou s a . Light-Dut

y(fuel , maintenance included ) i
. 8 hours/day , 4 2 day

s cost/hour : 7 5 hours/day : 8 Cost/Day : 60 0 wk.da ycosts :
weeken d cts . cost/day :

no . ofdays : Total : cost/day : premium : adj
. cost/dy : no . o fdays : Total : 60 0

3 0 1800 0 60 0 1.5 90 0 1 2 1080 0 Tota l Cost ofComb
. Emissio n Gen
. fo rLD V fo r8hr/day , 4 2 da yBio
. Test : 2880 0
ii
. Ame s Assa

y cost/FTP : st fo rparticulat e prep. :

Total : 60 0

100 70 0P.1 1
Tota l Cost ofComb
. Emissio n Gen
. fo rLDV fo rAme s test : 70 0

b
. Heavy-Dut

y i
. 8 hours/day , 4 2 day

s cost/hour : hours/day : cost/day : fue l $/day : Tota l cost pe rday* : wk.da ycosts : cost/day : no . o fdays : Total : weeken d cts. : cost/day :

premium : adj
. cost/dy : no . o fdays : Total : 3 0

8 24 0 6 0 30 0 30 0 3 0 900 0 30 0 1. 5 45 0 1 2 540 0 Tota l Cost o

fComb
. Emissio n Gen
. fo rHD V fo r8hr/day , 4 2 da

yBio
. Test : 14400 include s fue l an d maintenance
. Fue l = 1. 2 gal/2 0 mi n tran s tes t X 60min/h r x8hr/day- 3 0 (28.8 ) gal/dayx$2.00/ga l = $6 0 pe rda y ii
. Ame s Assa

y cost/FTP : cos t fo rparticulat e prep. :

Total : 800 0

30 0 830 0 Tota l Cost ofComb
. Emissio n Gen
. fo rHDV fo rAme s Test : 830 0

2
. Evaporative (Benc h Method ) a . Light-dut

yonl y i
. 8 hours/day , 4 2 day

s Set-u p $ : 405 0 cost/hr : hrs/day : cost/day : 1 0

8 8 0P.1 2

wk.da ycosts : cost/day : 8 0 no . ofdays : 3 0 Total : 240 0 weeken d cts. : cost/day : 8 0

premium : 1.5 adj
. cost/dy : 12 0 no . ofdays : 1 2 Total : 1440 Tota l cos t ofevap . emissio n gen . fo rLDV fo r8hr/day , 4 2 da yBio
. Test : 789 0

ii
. Ame s Assa

y cost : N o incrementa l

B
. Biologica l Testin g

1
. individua l Tes t Costs a . Carcinogenicityan d Mutagenicit yScreen s i
. Ame s Revers e Mutatio n Assa ycost : 410 0 ii
. Roden t Bon e Marrow- Micronucleu s Assa ycost : 4400 0 iiiii
. Roden t Bon e Marrow- Siste rChromati d Exchang e (SCE ) cost : 4900 0 b
. TeratogenicityScree n Developmental , bot h ra

t an d mous e cost : 9800 0 c . Reproductive an d FertilityScree n cost : 10000 0 d
. Pulmonar

yToxicityScree n cost : 8100 0 e . NeurotoxicityScree n cost : 8300 0 Tota l biologica l tes t costs i fconducte d individually : 45910 0 2
. Costs ofcombine d biologica l tests , conducte d o n combustio n emission s (Se e explanatio n ofcombine d cost s a t en d ofattachment ) a . Ame s Revers e Mutatio n Assa y(Tw o Required-Cannot b e combined ) 820 0 b
. Combine d Teratogenicity& Neurotoxicit yScreen s (Rat) , i n conjunctio n wit h Combine d Pulmonar yToxicity , Reproductive Toxicity , an d TeratogenicityScreen s (Mouse ) 22000 0 c . Combine d Roden t Bon e MarrowScreen s (Micronucleu s Assay , Siste rChromati d Exchange ) 6600 0P.1 3

Tota l biologica l tes t cost s i fcombined : 29420 0 3
. Costs ofcombine d biologica l tests , conducte d o n evaporative emission s a . Ame s Revers e Mutatio n Assa y(not require d fo revap. ) 0 b
. Combine d Teratogenicity& Neurotoxicit yScreen s (Rat) , i n conjunctio n wit h Combine d Pulmonar yToxicity , Reproductive Toxicity , an d TeratogenicityScreen s (Mouse ) 22000 0 c . Combine d Roden t Bon e MarrowScreen s (Micronucleu s Assay , Siste rChromati d Exchange ) 6600 0 Tota l biologica l tes t costs ifcombined : 2MQ0 Q 4
. Cost ofdilutio n syste m 1100

III . Administrative/Reportin g Cost s A
. Administration/Managemen t

cost/hr : 4 9 hours : 20 8 Tota l Cost : 10192 B
. Professional/Technica l

cost/hr : hours : Tota l Cost : C
. Clerica l cost/hr :

hours : Tota l Cost : Tota l Annua l Administrative Cost : Numbe ro fYears : Tota l Administrative Costs : 3 3 1040 3432 0 1 5 52 0 780 0 5231 2

3 15693 6P.1 4

Explanatio n o f Combine d Tes t Cost s Ame s Revers e Mutatio n Assa y Du e t o th e technica l difficult yan d expens e o f testin g gaseou s sample s wit h thi s assay , a separat e Salmonell a typhimuriu mRevers e Mutatio n (Ames ) assayi s require d fo r bot h th e particulat e and th e semi-volatil e fraction s o f a product' s exhaus t emission s (eacha t a n estimate d cos t o f $4100 ) bu t no t o n th e gaseou s portio n o f thos e emissions . Likewise , a s evaporativ e emission s ar e see n a s havin g onl ya gaseou s component , a product' s evaporativ e emission s ar e no t subjec t t o testin g i n thi s particula r assay . Becaus e thi s assaydoe s no t requir e testin g o f laboratoryanimals , i t canno t b e combine d wit h an yo f th e othe r propose d screenin g tests . Combine d Teratogenicit yan d Neurotoxicit yScreen s (Rat) , i n conjunctio n wit h Combine d PulmonaryToxicity , Repro ductiv e Toxicity , and Teratogenicit yScreen s (Mouse ) Fo r purpose s o f th e cos t analysis , EP Aassume d tha t Teratogenicit yan

d Neurotoxicit yscreen s usin g rat s woul d b e combine d fo r testin g purposes , an d similarly , th e Reproductiv e Toxicity , PulmonaryToxicity , an d Teratogen icit yscreen s usin g mic e woul d b e combined . Thes e 2 tes t block s woul d b e conducte d concurrentl yusin g th e same sampl e o f dilute d emissions , assumin g laboratoryfacili
tie s ha d th e capabilit yo f conductin g thes e test s simultaneously . B yincreasin g th e numbe r o f tes t atmosphere-expose d animal s i n an

yon e study , i t i s possibl e t o run 1- 2 mor e studie s concurrentl yo n th e "excess " animal s i n eac h tes t population . Th e tw o screenin g assay s fo r teratogenicit y requir e separat e mous e and ra t tes t populations . Multipl e studie s requirin g eithe r specie s mayb e run i n conjunctio n wit h eac h o f th e teratogenicit yscreens . Th e rat s neede d fo r th e Functiona l Observationa l Neurotoxic
it yBatter y(FONB ) ma yb e house d and expose d simulta
neousl ywit h th e ra t tes t populatio n fo r th e teratogeni
cit yscree n i n rats . Th e mic e neede d fo r bot h th e Sub
acut e PulmonaryToxicit yStud yan d th e Reproductio n an d Fertilit yScree n mayb e house d and expose d simultaneousl y wit h th e mous e tes t populatio n fo r th e teratogenicit y scree n i n mice . Saving s ar e realize d i n no t havin g t o run fiv e separat e exposure s no r havin g t o hous e fiv e separat e tes t populations . Furthermore , runnin g multipl e studie s a t th e same tim e i n clos e physica l proximit yreduce s th e numbe r o f professiona l and technica l person-hour s expende d and lower s th e "overhead " and direc t suppl y cost s o f th e testin g programfo r th e facility . I n th e combine d scenario , pulmonar yeffect s ar e teste d i n mice , whil e th e testin g guideline s recommend tha t th e Sub-acut e PulmonaryToxicit yStud yb e run o n rats . I n apportionin g pulmonar yand neurotoxicit ytestin gP.1 5

t o eithe r o f th e tw o tes t populations , ra t o r mouse , th e pulmonar ystud

yi s mor e easil yadapte d t o testin g i n mic e tha n th e functiona l neurotoxicit ystud ywhich , histori
cally , ha s bee n run i n rats . Consequently , th e combine d scenari o recommend s testin g fo r pulmonaryeffect s i n th e mous e population . Combine d Roden t Bon e Marro wScreen s Th e ra t i s th e recommende d tes t anima l i n bot h th e Siste r Chromati d Exchang e (SCE ) an d Micronucleu s (MN ) assays . A s eac h assayrequire s tha t differen t tissue s b e harveste d fo r analysi s (lun g cells , periphera l bloo d fo r SC E an d bon e marro wfo r MN ) , bot h assay s ca n b e run concurrentl yi n th e same roden t tes t population . Aon e thir d cos t saving s result s fromhavin g t o maintai n an d expos e onl yhal f th e numbe r o f rodent s neede d fo r tw o separat e assays .P.1 6



### Attachmen t 2 Cost s pe r Tie rP.1 7

Tie r1 costs : Light-Dut y(GAS ) Data Research/Analysi s Vehicl e Acquistion/Operatin g costs Mileag e Accumulatio n Combustio n gen/speciatio n o fHC,Ald,Alc,Reg s Comb , gen/spec , o

fPAH , NPA H Comb , gen/spe cofAtypica l Elements Evap
. gen/spec , ofHC.AIcohol s Total : MFGs
. o f Non-Atvpical 1650 0 675 0 2500 0 885 0 1830 0 0 420 0 7960 0 MFGs
. o f Atypicals 1650 0 1350 0 5000 0 885 0 1830 0 340 0 420 0 11475 0 Heavy-Dut

y(Diesel ) Data Research/Analysi s Vehicl e Acquistio n minu s Salvag e Valu e Maintenance cost Fue l cost Mileag e Accumulatio n Combustio n gen/speciatio n o fHC,Aid,Ale,Reg s Comb , gen/spec , ofPAH , NPA H Comb , gen/spe cofAtypica l Elements Evap
. gen/spec , ofHC.AIcohol s Total : 1650 0 400 0 75 0 325 0 1344 0 3195 0 4020 0 0 0 11009 0 1650 0 850 0 435 0 1885 0 7800 0 3195 0 4020 0 1070 0 0 20905 0

Tie r2 costs : Light-Dut y(GAS ) Comb , emiss
. gen . fo r4 2 dayexp . (necessar yt o generat e emission s twice , fo r conductin g al l biologica l test s combined ) Comb , emiss
. gen . (FTP ) fo rAme s Evap
. gen . fo r4 2 da

yexp . (2 generation s necessar

yfo rconductin g al l biologica l tests ) MFGs
. o f Non-Atypical 5760 0

70 0 1578 0 MFGs
. o f Atypicals 5760 0

70 0 1578 0
Al l biologica l test s require d t o b e conducte d o n combustio n emission s 29420 0 29420 0 Al l biologica l test s require d t o b e conducte d o n evaporativ e emission s Cost o fdilutio n syste m Total : 28600 0 1100 65538 0 28600 0 110 0 65538 0P.1 8

Heavy-Dut

y(Diesel ) Comb , emiss
. gen . fo r4 2 dayexp . (necessar yt o generat e emission s twice , fo r conductin g al l biologica l test s combined ) 2880 0 2880 0
Comb , emiss
. gen . (FTP ) fo rAme s Al l biologica l test s require d t o b e conducte d o n combustio n emission s Al l biologica l test s require d t o b e conducte d o n evaporativ e emission s Cost ofdilutio n syste m 

### Total : 830 0 29420 0

0 110 0 33240 0 830 0 29420 0

0 110 0 33240 0
Administrative cost s (3 yr) 

### 15693 6 15693 6P.1 9



### Attachmen t 3 Cost s pe r Categor

yP.2 0 CATEGORYCOSTS CATEGORY : Unleade d Gas - Baselin e Combustion : 1 Representative : Assum e n o speciatio n required , an d onl yTerat. , Neurotox , Reprod
. Testin g Require d Evap. : 1 Representative : Assum e speciatio n req. , al l tie r2 test s req .

Tie r1 costs :

Dat a search/analysi s 1650 0 Vehicl e acq/oper
. 675 0 Mileag e accum . 2500 0 Evap
. gen/spec
. 420 0

tota l tie r1 5245 0 Tie r2 costs : cos t ofdilutio n syste m 110 0 Combust.: 1 em . gen . 2880 0

Ter. , Neuro. , Rep
. tests : 22000 0 Evap : 1 em . gen . 789 0

Bon e marrowtes t bloc k

6600 0 Ame s 0 1 em . ge n 789 0 Ter , neuro , rep . bloc k

22000 0 tota l tie r2 55168 0 Administrative cost s Tota l U L Gas - Baselin e Categor yCost : 

### 15693 6

76106 6

CATEGORY : Unleade d Ga s - Non-Baselin e Combustion : 1 Representative : Assum e speciatio n req. , al l tie r2 tes t req . Evap. : 1 Representative : Assum e speciatio n req. , al l tie r2 test s req .

Tie r1 costs :

Data search/analysi s Vehicl e acq/oper
. Mileag e accum . Comb , gen/spec
. Evap
. gen/spec
.

tota l tie r1 Tie r2 costs : cost ofdilutio n syste m 1650 0 675 0 2500 0 2715 0 420 0 7960 0 110 0P.2 1

Combust
.

Evap : 1 FT P fo rAme s

Ame s 1 em . gen . Bon e Marrowbloc k 1 em . gen . Ter. , Neuro. , Rep
. tests :

tota l 1 em . gen . Bon e marrowtes t bloc k Ame s 1 em . gen . Ter , neuro , rep . bloc k

tota l tota l tie r2 Administrative cost s a s - Non-Baselin e Categor yCost : 70 0

820 0 2880 0 6600 0 2880 0 22000 0 35250 0 789 0 6600 0 0 789 0 22000 0 30178 0 65538 0 15693 6 89191 6

CATEGORY : Unleade d Ga s •Atypica l (WIT H EVAP) Combustion : 1 Representative : Assum e speciatio n req. , al l tie r2 tes t Evap. : 1 Representative : Assum e speciatio n req. , al l tie r2 test s req .

Tie r1 costs :

Data search/analysi s 1650 0 Vehicl e acq/oper
. 1350 0 Mileag e accum . 5000 0 Comb , gen/spec
. 3055 0 Evap
. gen/spec
. 420 0

tota l tie r1 11475 0 Tie r2 costs : cost o fdilutio n syste m 1100 Combust
. 1 FT P fo rAme s 70 0

Ame s 820 0 1 em . gen . 2880 0 Bon e Marrowbloc k

6600 0 1 em . gen . 2880 0 Ter. , Neuro. , Rep
. tests : 22000 0

tota l 35250 0P.2 2

tvap : 1 em . gen . 789 0

Bon e marrowtes t bloc k

6600 0 Ame s 0 1 em . gen . 789 0 Ter , neuro , rep . bloc k

22000 0 tota l 30178 6 tota l tie r2 65538 0 Administrative cost s 15693 6 Tota l U L Gas - Atypcla l Categor yCost : 

### 92706 6 COSTO F CONTRO L FUE L TESTIN G 73498 0

CATEGORY : Diese l - Baselin e Combustion : 1 Rep
. - Assum e onl yTerat. , Neuro
. Assum e n o evap .

Tie r1 costs :

Data search/analysi s Vehicl e acq . - salvag e maintenance fue l cos t mileag e accumulatio n

tota l tie r1 Tie r2 : cos t ofdilutio n syste m

1 emissio n gen . Ter. , Neuro. , Rep
. bloc k

tota l tie r2 Administrativ e cost s Tota l Diese l •Baselin e Rep
. Testin g re q 1650 0 400 0 75 0 325 0 1344 0 3794 0 110 0 1440 0 22000 0 23550 0 15693 6 43037 6

CATEGORY : Diese l - Non-Baselin e Combustion : 1 rep . - Assum e speciatio n required , al l Tie r2 test s req . Assum e n o evap .

Tie r1 costs :

Dat a search/analysi s 1650 0P.2 3 Vehicl e acq . - salvag e maintenance fue l cos t mileag e accumulatio n Comb
. em . gen/spec
.

tota l tie r1 Tie r2 costs :

cos t ofdilutio n syste m 1 em . gen . Ame s 1 em . gen . Bon e MarrowBloc k 1 em . gen . Ter , Neuro , rep . bloc k

tota l tie r2 Administrativ e costs 1 •Non-Baselin e 400 0 75 0 325 0 13440 7215 0 11009 0 110 0 830 0 820 0 1440 0 6600 0 1440 0 22000 0 33240 0 15693 6 59942 6

CATEGORY : Diese l - Atypica l Combustion : 1 Re p - Assum e speciatio n req. , al l Tie r2 test s req . Assum e n o evap .

Tie r1 costs :

Dat a search/analysi s 1650 0 Vehicl e acq . - salvag e 850 0 maintenance 435 0 fue l cost 1885 0 mileag e accumulatio n 7800 0 Comb
. em . gen/spec
. 8285 0

tota l tie r1 20905 0 Tie r2 costs :

cos t ofdilutio n syste m 110 0 1 em . gen . 830 0 Ame s 820 0 1 e m ge n fo rB
. Marrow1440 0 Bon e MarrowBloc k

6600 0 1 Em
. gen . 1440 0 Ter , Neuro , rep . bloc k

22000 0 tota l tie r2 33240 0 Administrativ e cost s 

### 15693 6 Tota l Diese l - Atypica l 

### 69838 6P.24
_ -( COSTO F CONTRO L FUE L TESTIN G 44249 0
CATEGORY : Unleade d Gas - Atypica l (N O EVAP ) Combustion : 1 Representative : Assum e speciatio n req. , al l Tie r2 test s req . Evap. : 1 Representative : Assum e onl yspeciatio n req .

Tie r1 costs :

Data search/analysi s 1650 0 Vehicl e acq/oper
. 1350 0 Mileag e accum . 5000 0 comb , gen/spec
. 3055 0 Evap
. gen/spec
. 420 0

tota l tie r1 11475 0 Tie r2 costs : cost o fdilutio n syste m 110 0 Combust
. 1 FT P fo rAme s 70 0

Ame s 820 0 1 em . gen . 2880 0 Bon e Marrowbloc k

6600 0 1 em . gen . 2880 0 Ter. , Neuro. , Rep
. tests : 22000 0

tota l 35250 0 tota l tie r2 35360 0 Administrative cost s 15693 6 Tota l U L Ga s - Atypcla l (n o evap ) ca t cost : 62528 6 COS TO F CONTRO L FUE L TESTIN G 43320 0