alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SCANTEK
MEDICAL INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>               1

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    9,090
<SECURITIES>                                            257,020
<RECEIVABLES>                                            24,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                             883,558
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1,276,882
<PP&E>                                                2,058,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                          479,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        3,452,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 4,936,995
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                 18,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                          (3,411,530)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          3,452,536
<SALES>                                                  29,775
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        627,275
<CGS>                                                   275,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         1,820,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        268,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      293,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,461,476)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,461,476)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,461,476)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.08)




</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Application of Foy Productions, Ltd., and Principal Film Exchange, Inc., Petitioners, for an Order against Frank P. Graves, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County,

September 24, 1937.

*480
      *Goldstein & Goldstein [Jonah J. Goldstein*and *Lawrence Kovalsky,*of counsel], for the petitioners.

*Ernest E. Cole [Charles A. Brind, Jr.,*of counsel], for the respondent.

Bergan, J.

The relief sought by petitioners clearly comes within subdivision 7 of section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act. The purpose of the amendment of 1937 (Laws of 1937, chap. 526), in general, was not to enlarge the scope of review by the Special Term to include certiorari proceedings based upon the sufficiency of evidence to sustain the determination sought to be reviewed or the weight of the evidence upon which the determination was based. Such a review, as under the former practice, is within the jurisdiction of the Appellate Division. The primary purpose of the amendment seems to have been to prevent the failure of the relief appropriate to a given case because of a mistake in remedy enumerated in the proceeding. In some respects the jurisdiction of the Special Term seems to have been enlarged by the amendment but the jurisdiction does not extend to the question whether the evidence before an officer or a board having the power to make a determination was sufficient to sustain the determination and whether from such evidence the determination was reasonable. The reasonableness of the determination of the Commissioner of Education in this case must be “ transferred for disposition to a term of the Appellate Division held within the judicial department embracing the county in which the proceeding is instituted.” This relief is sought by the petitioner in the alternative.

An order directing such transfer of this proceeding to the Appellate Division, Third Department, may be submitted.
**Exhibit 21.1**
**SUBSIDIARIES LIST**     **NAME** **JURISDICTION OFINCORPORATION **OPERATING NAMES**** **    Capital Environmental Holdings Company Nova Scotia, Canada n/a     Waste Services (CA) Inc. Canada n/a     Ram-PakCompaction Systems Ltd. Canada n/a     Gap Disposal (2001) Ltd. Saskatchewan, Canada n/a     Waste Services of Alabama, Inc. Delaware, United States n/a     Waste Services of Arizona, Inc. Delaware, United States Arizona Waste Services    WSI of Arizona, Inc.    Dell Waste Systems    ABC Disposal    Complete Waste    Horizon Waste Services     Cactus Waste Systems, LLC Arizona, United States n/a     Omni Waste of Osceola County LLC Ohio, United States n/a     Jacksonville Florida Landfill, Inc. Delaware, United States n/a     Jones Road Landfill and Recycling Ltd. Florida, United States n/a     Waste Services of Florida Inc. Delaware, United States Florida Recycling Services     Florida Recycling Services, Inc. Illinois, United States n/a     Florida Recycling Services, Inc. Delaware, United States n/a     Waste Services Limited Partner, LLC Delaware, United States n/a     WS General Partner, LLC Texas, United States n/a     Fort Bend Regional Landfill LP Texas, United States n/a     Ruffino Hills Transfer Station LP Texas, United States n/a**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; NIAAA Special Emphasis Panel for Member Conflict Applications.                    

*Date:*                         November 19, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Luis Espinoza, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer. Extramural Project Review Branch. Office of Extramural Activities, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 2109, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-8599,                         *espinozala@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 25, 2024.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-25333 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Boston RestaurantAssociates, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)                                  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended October 23, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 23, 2005 |  /s/ George R. Chapdelaine       |   |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                               | George R. Chapdelaine                 |
|                               | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.

 

1

----
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-86426) of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (ACS) of our report
dated July 28, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
ACS Government Solutions Group, Inc. (formerly Computer Data Systems, Inc.),
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1999.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Washington D.C.
September 28, 1999
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 24
- 00407
- CV

In re Phillip “ Baby Shark ” Scott

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

P h illip “ Baby Shark ” Scott filed a request fo r Abuse

- of

- Discretion Re view of the failure o f the 2 2nd District Court of Comal County to review “ many documents and habeas
corpus applications in need of rulings but ign ored. ” His requested relief is in the natu re of a petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.
T o be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show (1) that the relator has no adequate remedy at law for obtaining the relief the relator seeks; and (2) t hat the relator seeks to compel a ministerial act rather than a discretionary act. In re Powell , 51 6 S.W.3d 488, 494

- 95 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017) (orig. proceeding)

. A trial court has a ministerial duty to consider and rule on motions properly filed and pending before it, and mandamus may issue to compel the trial court to act. In re Pete , 589 S.W.3d 3 20 , 321 (Tex. App.

— Hous to n [ 1 4th Dist. ] 2019 , orig. proceeding )

. A relator must establish that the trial court (1) had a legal duty to rule on the motion; (2) was asked to rule on the motion; and (3) failed or refused to rule on the motion within a reason ab le time. Id. It is a relator ’ s burden to provide a sufficient r ecord to establish that the relator is entitled to relief. Id

.2 A relator who has established that his motions are properly pending must also show that his motions were properly presented to the trial court for rulings and show how long the motions have been pending since presentment

. See In re Henry , 525 S.W.3d 381 , 382 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, orig. proceeding). Merely f iling a document with the district clerk does not imp ute the clerk ’ s knowledge of the filing to the trial court and does not equate to

a reques t that the trial court rule on the motion

. In re Craig , 426 S.W.3d 106, 107 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, orig. pro ceeding)

. The trial court is not required to c onsider any motion that has not been called to its attention by proper means. See Henry , 525 S.W.3d at 382. Relator has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief. He did not attach any file

- stamped copies of the motions in question to establis h th eir filing , has not establish ed that he properly presented his motions to the trial court for ruling s, and has not shown how long the motions have remain ed pending after presen tment. In the absence of such a reco rd , relator has not established that he is entitled to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne , Chief Justice

Before Ch ief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis Filed: Ju ne 28, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### U.S. International Development Finance Corporation

# AGENCY:

U.S. International Development Finance Corporation.

# ACTION:

Announcement of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The Board of Directors of U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), in accordance with the Better Utilization of Investments Leading to Development (BUILD) Act of 2018, will hold a public hearing to provide an opportunity for stakeholders to present their views. Those wishing to attend, present at, or submit a written statement to the Board prior to the public hearing must provide advance notice to the agency as detailed below.

# DATES:

2 p.m. EST, Wednesday, December 4, 2024.

# ADDRESSES:

The public hearing will take place virtually. Access information will be provided at the time of attendee registration.

*Registration:*                         To attend, present at, or submit a written statement to the Board prior to the public hearing, individuals must notify DFC Corporate Secretary Daniel Woubishet at                         *corporate.secretary@dfc.gov*                         by 5 p.m. EST, Thursday, November 28, 2024.                    

Notices of intent to attend or present at the public hearing must include the individual's name, title, organization, address, email address, phone number, and a concise summary of the subject matter to be presented. Oral presentations may not exceed five minutes and may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, to afford all participants an opportunity to be heard.

Written statements submitted to the Board prior to the public hearing must include the individual's name, title, organization, address, email address, and phone number. Statements must be typewritten, double-spaced, and less than ten pages in length.

Lisa Wischkaemper,

Administrative Counsel, Office of the General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2024-25359 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-136638) pertaining to
the American Community Properties Trust Employees' share incentive plan and to
American Community Properties Trust Trustees’ share incentive plan, of our
report dated March 30, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of American Community Properties Trust, incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2008.






/s/
Ernst & Young LLP









McLean, Virginia





March 30,
2009
#### STATE v. ADMIRAL N. CADWELL.

A defendant, upon a trial for a clergyable felony, is entitled to challenge, peremptorily, thirty-five jurors.

This was an indictment for Grand Larceny, tried before his Honor Judge Saundees, at the Spring Term, 1854, of Anson Superior Court.

The defendant claimed the right to challenge, peremptorily, thirty-five jurors, and having challenged four, offered to challenge the fifth juror, but the challenge was disallowed, and the juror taken and sworn.

Defendant excepted for error.

The jury found the defendant guilty.

Rule for a *venire de novo,*for error in the matter excepted to. Rule discharged. Appeal.

*Attorney G-eneral,*for the State.

Kelly, for the defendant.

Nash, C. J.

The question presented for our consideration on this record, arises under the 19th sec. of the 35th ch. of the Revised Statutes. It is as follows : “Every person on trial for his life, may make a peremptory challenge of thirty-five jurors,” &e. Was the defendant on trial for his life ? Unquestionably he was. Simple larceny, where the thing stolen is of the value of twelve-pence sterling, is a felony punishable with death by the common law; and but for the Statutes for the amelioration of the law, granting the benefit of clergy, might be still so visited. The stealing, to the value of twelve-pence, is a capital felony. 4th Bl. Com. 288. But the prisoner will not suffer death for the first offence. He is entitled to the benefit of his clergy. The verdict of the jury, when they convict, is that the prisoner is guilty of the felonious stealing. In order to *290avoid the extreme penalty of the law, he must, in answer to the question asked him by the clerk, “what he has to say why sentence of *death*should not be pronounced upon him,” pray the benefit of his clergy, which is immediately granted him. In contemplation of law, by a conviction of a clergyable felony, the prisoner’s life is forfeited. See State v. Carroll, 5th Ire. 259. The prisoner in this case was indicted for grand larceny, and was, under the act of Assembly, entitled to his full, peremptory challenge of thirty-five jurors. And the denial of this right was error in the presiding Judge, entitling the prisoner to a *venire de novo.*

This opinion will be certified.

Judgment reversed.
----

----

| 1. | the      annual report on Form 10-K of Falcon Ridge Development Inc., for the      period ended September, 2008  (the “Report”) fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Falcon      Ridge Development Inc. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |
|   |   |

|                                     |                         |                         |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                     |                         |
|                                     |                         |                         |
| Dated:  January      13, 20098 |                         | /s/ Karen      Y. Duran |
|                                     | Karen      Y. Duran,         |
|                                     | Chief      Financial Officer |

----

----
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 460

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1999

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 401

South Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the

‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 460 RFH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT K. RODIBAUGH

2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTHOUSE.

3 The United States courthouse located at 401 South

4 Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, shall be known

5 and designated as the ‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United

6 States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

10 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

11 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United

12 States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

Passed the Senate March 23, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.