alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ads In Motion, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Edward F. Myers III,
as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: 4/13/10                           By: /s/ Edward F. Myers III
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Edward F. Myers III
                                            Chief Executive Officer & Chief
                                            Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10816]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    COMMUNICATION FROM CONGRESSIONAL AIDE, THE HONORABLE WILLIAM J. 
                     JEFFERSON, MEMBER OF CONGRESS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from Ericka Edwards-Jones, Congressional Aide, the 
Honorable William J. Jefferson, Member of Congress:

                                    Congress of the United States,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                  Washington, DC, October 1, 2008.
     Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
     Speaker, House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Madam Speaker: This is to notify you formally, 
     pursuant to rule VIII of the Rules of the House of 
     Representatives, that I have been served with a subpoena, 
     issued in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of 
     Virginia, for testimony in a criminal case.
       After consultation with the Office of General Counsel, I 
     have determined that compliance with the subpoena is 
     consistent with the precedents and privileges of the House.
           Sincerely,
                                             Ericka Edwards-Jones,
     Congressional Aide.

                          ____________________
```
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00246

- CR

TENISHA LATRICE REYN OLDS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT CO URT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

----- ----- Pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court convicted Appellant Tenisha
Latrice Reynolds upon her plea of guilty to the state jail felony of prostitution with
three or more prior convictions and sentenced her to seven months’

confinement. 2 Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.02(c) (West 2011).2

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea

- bargained case and
that Appellant has no right of appeal and that Appellant has waived the right of
appeal . Accordingly, we informed Appellant by letter on June 2 4, 2011 , that this
case was subject to dismissal unless she or any party showed grounds for
continuing the appeal on or before July 5, 2011. 3 We have received no

response.
Accordingly, w e dismiss this appeal
, 4 and we deny Appellant’s counsel’s

motion to w ithdraw.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 28, 2011

3 See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

4 See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 01/01-0426]

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, under section 309 of the Act and section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 01/01-0426 issued to Long River Ventures III, L.P., said license is hereby declared null and void.

Thomas Morris,

Director, Patient Capital Investments, Office of Investment and Innovation, United States Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2024-25344 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Ronald R. Remick, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of K-Tron International, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 23, 2006 RONALD R. REMICK   Ronald R. Remick   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer
### -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/30 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 162 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1239]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        House of Representatives

Chamber Action
  The House was not in session today. The House is scheduled to meet at 
11 a.m. on Saturday, January 3, 2009, pursuant to the provisions of H. 
Con. Res. 440.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10422]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             STAFF SERGEANT NICHOLAS RAY CARNES POST OFFICE

  The bill (H.R. 6902) to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 5136 6th Avenue in Dayton, Kentucky, as the 
``Staff Sergeant Nicholas Ray Carnes Post Office,'' was considered, 
ordered to a third reading, read the third time, and passed.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I,Fran Ross, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Qof Boston Restaurant Associates, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) [omitted]

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 23, 2005 | /s/ Fran Ross                      |   |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Fran Ross, Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of
Abrams Industries, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Thomas,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. July 19, 2004
    Date:/s/ Mark J. ThomasMark J. ThomasChief Financial Officer
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-81,945-01
IN RE LEONARD RAY JAC KSON, Re lator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 2002CR5940 IN THE 175 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM BEXAR COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he wrote to the Be x ar County District Clerk reque sting a

n estimate of c osts for copies of his trial transcr ipts, but has rece ived no re sponse. In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Be x ar County , is order ed to file a response stating whether sh e re ce ived a reque st from the Relator for a statement of c osts for his trial rec ords. I f the District Clerk receive d such a reque st, she shall state the nature of her response and, if available , provide a copy of the response . I f the Distri ct Clerk
rec eived such a reque st and did not respond, she shall provide her rationale for not responding
. This2

ap p l i cation for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respond en t h as submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitt ed within 30 day s of the date of this order.
Filed: September

17, 2014 Do not publish
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 10

- 00186

- CV

Benjamin T. CAMERO and Noemi M. Camero, Appellants

v.

Rodolfo ALVARADO and Natalie Alvarado, Appellees

From the 225th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006

- CI

- 13764 Honorable Larry Noll , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 1, 2010

REVERSED AND REMANDED

On May 27, 2010, this appeal was abated for mediation. On August 11, 2010, the

mediator filed a report, stating the parties mediated and settled. On August 18, 2010, the

appellants filed a written advisory, stating the parties reached a me diated settlement. The appeal

is therefore reinstated on the docket of this court. The appellants’ advisory states that the parties

are requesting that the trial court’s judgment be reversed, and that the cause be remanded for the

entry of a judgment in conformity with their settlement agreement.04

- 10

- 00186

- CV

- 2

- The advisory is noted. The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is

remanded for the entry of a judgment in conformity with the parties’ settlement agreement. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a), 43. 2(d). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who have incurred

them.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 99.8  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the reference to our Firm under the caption Interests of Experts and to the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2015 (the Annual Report), and the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-10 (registration no. 333-189715), Form F-3D (registration no. 333-190888) and Form S-8 (registration nos. 333-130339 and 333-152004) of our reports dated March 25, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and January 1, 2013 and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2014 and with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited, which reports are included in the Annual Report.  Toronto, CanadaMarch 25,   2015/s/ ERNST &   YOUNG LLPChartered   Professional Accountants   Licensed Public Accountants
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20734 and #20735; SOUTH CAROLINA Disaster Number 
SC-20013]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of South Carolina

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of South 
Carolina (FEMA-4829-DR), dated October 6, 2024.
    Incident: Hurricane Helene.

DATES: Issued on October 24, 2024.
    Incident Period: September 25, 2024, and continuing.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: December 5, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: July 7, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of South 
Carolina, dated October 6, 2024, is hereby amended to include the 
following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties:
    Kershaw, Lancaster.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-25348 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
#### *Doe on the demise of*H. M. GILES *v. J.*M. PALMER.

A sale of land under, and by virtue of, a judgment and execution, transfers, at law, all the estate, rights and interest, of the defendant, in the execution, even the legal estate which he holds as trustee.

This was an actioN of ejeotmeiít, tried before SauN-dees, J., at the Spring Term, 185T, of Orange Superior Court.

J. M. Palmer made a deed of trust of the property in question to N. J. Palmer, trustee,- dated 21st of March, 1853, to secure various creditors therein mentioned, upon conditions, and provisions which, the plaintiif contended below, were fraudulent and void as against creditors. This property was sold by the trustee, and bought by Henry Lutterloh at a'full price, who conveyed the same to the defendant, as the trustee of his wife.

"While Palmer was thus seized, the property in question was levied upon and sold, by virtue of an execution in favor of Foley and Woodside against him, and the plaintiif purchased it at auction, and took the sheriff’s deed for the same.

There were various important questions growing out-of the validity of the instrument, but the Court perceiving that there was error in the charge of his Honor, upon the general right of the plaintiff to recover, independently of these questions, therefore, declined to hear them discussed.

Judgment below was rendered *proforma*for the defendant, on the case agreed. Plaintiff appealed.

*Bailey*and *Bowie,*for plaintiff.

*Graham,*for defendant.

*387Nash, C. J.

The defence offered in this action, cannot avail the defendant here. The defendant holds the land in question as trustee for his wife 5 as such the legal title is in him. The lessor of the plaintiff is the purchaser of the land at a sheriff’s sale, under an execution against the defendant. A purchaser at a sheriff’s sale succeeds to all the rights of the defendant in the execution ; that is, acquires the interest the latter had, whatever that may be, in the state it was in at the time the execution was levied. *Rutherford*v. Green, 2 Ire. Eq. 121. The defendant, in the execution, cannot deny the purchaser’s right to stand in his shoes. Should the plaintiff, in this case, attempt to deprive the trustee of the possession of the premises, the remedy of the *oestui que tn'ust*will be in a Court of Equity.

There is error in the judgment below, and, by consent of the defendant, judgment is rendered for the plaintiff.

Pee CueiaM. Judgment reversed.
TO THE PEOPLE OF KANSAS, GREETINGS: 

WHEREAS, Kansas workers deserve to work in a safe and healthy environment; and 

WHEREAS, the Kansas Department of Labor's Industrial Safety and Health Division and the United 

States Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration have each been deeply 

committed to the safety and health of working men and women; and 

WHEREAS, by working together as Kansans first, labor and industry have joined with one another to 

prioritize workplace safety through outreach and education efforts; and 

WHEREAS, continuing efforts are needed to improve safety at all worksites and promote public awareness 

about the dangers of work zones and worksite hazards; and 

WHEREAS, since 1989, April 28th has been recognized locally and nationally as Workers' Memorial Day 

as a time to remember the courage and integrity of Kansas workers and to renew our commitment to 

securing safe and healthy working conditions for all employees. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Laura Kelly, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF KANSAS, do hereby proclaim 

April 28, 2023, as 

Worker's Memorial Day 

in the state of Kansas, and I urge all citizens to join in this observation. 

DONE: At the Capitol in Topeka 

under the Great Seal of 

the State this 28th day of 

BYTHEGOVERNOR ~·:~ll~ 

\/JdiJ~

I..../ Secreta1⁄4state 

~~~·~ ~sistant Secretary of State