alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2201]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           HONORING THE SERVICE AND RETIREMENT OF JIM WILSON

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. BART GORDON

                              of tennessee

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, October 2, 2008

  Mr. GORDON of Tennessee. Madam Speaker, I rise today to recognize the 
service of a valued staff member--Dr. James Wilson--who will retire at 
the end of this year from the staff of the Committee on Science and 
Technology. As the staff director of the Subcommittee on Research and 
Science Education, Jim's expertise and wisdom on issues of science and 
research policy and the federal role in science and math education are 
unmatched.
  Jim has served on the professional staff of the Committee since 1987. 
In his 21 years of service on the committee he has ably supported the 
oversight and authorization of the National Science Foundation; the 
U.S. Fire Administration; the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction 
Program; and K-12, undergraduate, and graduate science, mathematics, 
engineering, and technology education programs under the committee's 
jurisdiction. He has also played key roles in the committee's work on 
nanotechnology, high performance computing and communications, and 
information systems security. Moreover, Jim played a very important 
role in the formulation of the America COMPETES Act--an initiative 
enacted into law last year that will go a long way towards fostering 
increased investment in innovation and improve the competitiveness of 
the U.S. Jim's contributions were instrumental in making it a good and 
effective piece of legislation.
  Before coming to the Hill, Jim, who has a Ph.D. in aerospace 
engineering from West Virginia University, managed research programs in 
fluid dynamics at the Air Force Office of Scientific Research in 
Washington, DC, and served as an officer in the U.S. Air Force at the 
Flight Dynamics Laboratory at Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.
  Madam Speaker, Jim's dry wit, thoughtful approach to policy, 
institutional knowledge, and general unflappability have made him a 
valued member of the committee staff. I know that all of the Science 
and Technology Committee's Members and staff wish him and his wife 
Sandra well as he moves on to a well-deserved retirement. With his love 
of tennis, travel, driving his Porsche, and enjoyment of the area's 
cultural offerings, I know that he will not be bored once he leaves the 
Hill. In closing, I just want to say thank you, Jim, for your many 
years of dedicated and loyal service. We will miss you.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 521 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-143, K2025-141.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-25285 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 99.9  CONSENT OF DANIEL DOUCET  I consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2015 (the Annual Report) of my name and the information that I have approved of as a qualified person under the Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 in the Annual Information Form of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited dated March 12, 2015 (the AIF) filed as part of the Annual Report.  I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-10 (registration no. 333-174751), Form F-3D (registration no. 333-190888) and Form S-8 (registration nos. 333-130339 and 333-152004) of the reference to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.  March 25, 2015/s/   Daniel DoucetDaniel   DoucetCorporate   Director, Reserve Development
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             177
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,476
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,454
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,122
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,117
<LOANS>                                         17,621
<ALLOWANCE>                                        412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,878
<DEPOSITS>                                      19,899
<SHORT-TERM>                                       495
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                102
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  23,878
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,407
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  236
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    93
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,736
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 898
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 915
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              821
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       21
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    297
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.59
<LOANS-NON>                                        242
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    102
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   404
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       13
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  412
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               104
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            308
        





</TABLE>
#### STATE v. JAMES C. LUMSDEN and another.

*Lottery.*

The defendant sold to customers small boxes of candy, of trilling value, for the chance or opportunity of designating one of certain pictures, conveniently arranged in his place of business, behind some of which were small sums of money, and behind others a card on which was the letter “ C,” the *573purchaser getting either the money or the card, accordingly *as*lie may select; but if he got a card, he became entitled to another box of candy; *Held,*to constitute a lottery, and to be in violation of the statute. The Code, $1047.

*(State v. Bryant,*74 N. C., 207, cited and approved).

INDICTMENT for keeping a lottery, tried at May Special Term, 1883, of New Hanover Criminal Court, before *Meares, J.*

The jury rendered a special verdict, the facts of which are sufficiently set out in the opinion of this court, and thereupon His Honor held the defendants, Lumsden and Rhodes, to be guilty; judgment; appeal by the defendants.

*Attorney-General,*for the State.

No counsel for the defendants.

Merrimon, J.

A *lottery,*within the meaning of the statute of this state forbidding lotteries (Bat. Rev., ch. 32, §69), is a scheme, devise or game of hazard, wheréby for a smaller sum of money, or other thing of value, the person dealing therein •by chance or hazard, or contingency, may or may not get money or other thing of value, of greater or less value, or in some cases no value at all, from the owners or managers of such lottery. 2 Bish. Cr. L., §§945, 946, and notes.

It appears from the facts found in the special verdict in the case before us, that the defendants carried on the business whereby they would sell to their customers small boxes of candy of trifling value. This was the consideration for the *chance*or opportunity to designate, with a cue or slender stick, one of a number of pictures of uniform size set in a line on the wall across the counter, behind some of which were small sums of money, various in amount, and behind others of them were cards on which was the letter “ *Q.”*If the customer happened to designate a picture with money behind it, he got the money; if he happened to designate a picture with a card with the letter “C” on it behind it, he became entitled to recover another box *574of candy similar to tiie one be bad purchased. The customer did not know which of the pictures on the line the money was behind, nor the amount, nor did he know which of them the card with the letter “C” on it was behind, until he had exercised his right to designate one of the pictures at random. It was purely hazard; whether he got money was contingent; whether he got a larger or smaller sum was contingent; whether he got another package of candy or not was entirely left to chance.

We cannot doubt that the facts found in the verdict constitute the offence charged in the indictment. A scheme-called *“a gift enterprise,”*and so licensed in this state, having features in some respects strikingly like those in this case, was held to be a lottery under the statute. *State*v. *Bryant,*74 N. C., 207.

No error. Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 213 (Monday, November 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 87571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25513]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD24-10-000]

Reliability Technical Conference; Notice Inviting Post-Technical 
Conference Comments

    On Wednesday, October 16, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission) convened its annual Commissioner-led 
Reliability Technical Conference to discuss policy issues related to 
the reliability and security of the Bulk-Power System.
    All interested persons are invited to file post-technical 
conference comments to address issues raised during the technical 
conference or identified in the Second Supplemental Notice for this 
Technical Conference issued on October 7, 2024. Commenters are invited 
to reference material previously filed in this docket but are 
encouraged to avoid repetition or replication of their previous 
comments. Comments must be submitted on or before 30 days from the date 
of this Notice.
    Comments, identified by docket number, may be filed electronically 
or paper-filed. Electronic filing through https://www.ferc.gov is 
preferred. Documents must be filed in acceptable native applications 
and print-to-.pdf, but not in scanned or picture format. Instructions 
are available on the Commission's website: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
    Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, 
documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, submissions sent via 
the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to: Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, Office of the Secretary, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to:

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of the Secretary, 12225 
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

    For more information about this Notice, please contact:

Lodie White (Technical Information), Office of Energy Reliability, 
(202) 502-8453, [email protected].
Hampden T. Macbeth (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, 
(202) 502-8957, [email protected].

    Dated: October 28, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-25513 Filed 11-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Filed 10/23/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 210

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Jose Angel Anaya-Verajerano, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20120268

Appeal from the District Court of Bowman County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Harlan Patrick Weir, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

James D. Gion, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 101, Regent, N.D. 58650-0101, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.

Jay R. Greenwood, 135 Sims, Suite 221, Dickinson, N.D. 58601, for defendant and appellant; on brief.

State v. Anaya-Verajerano

No. 20120268

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Jose Anaya-Verajerano appealed from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of conspiracy to commit burglary and conspiracy to commit theft.  Anaya-Verajerano contends there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find that there was a conspiracy to commit burglary or theft.  We affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Federal Reporter or U.S.App.D.C. Reports. Users are requested to notify

the Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made

before the bound volumes go to press.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Argued September 17, 2001 Decided December 3, 2004

No. 01-7029

BRENDA ELAINE MAKINS,

APPELLANT

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND FRANCIS J. HENDERSON,

ACTING WARDEN, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS CENTRAL FACILITY,

APPELLEES

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia

(98cv02693)

Gregory L. Lattimer argued the cause and filed the briefs

for appellant.

Carl J. Schifferle, Assistant Attorney General, argued the

cause for appellees. With him on the brief was Robert J.

 Bills of costs must be filed within 14 days after entry of judgment.

The court looks with disfavor upon motions to file bills of costs out

of time.
2

Spagnoletti, Attorney General. Edward E. Schwab, Deputy

Attorney General, entered an appearance.

Before: HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, and ROGERS, Circuit

Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM: In this appeal from a district court judgment

enforcing a settlement agreement, we certified the following

question to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals:

Under District of Columbia law, is a client bound by

a settlement agreement negotiated by her attorney

when the client has not given the attorney actual

authority to settle the case on those terms but has

authorized the attorney to attend a settlement conference before a magistrate judge and to negotiate

on her behalf and when the attorney leads the

opposing party to believe that the client has agreed

to those terms?

Makins v. Dist. of Columbia, 277 F.3d 544, 553 (D.C. Cir.

2002). The D.C. Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, answered

the question in the negative. Makins v. Dist. of Columbia,

2004 WL 2471504 (Nov. 4, 2004). We must therefore set

aside the district court’s enforcement of the agreement on the

basis of the attorney’s apparent authority. Further proceedings on remand are needed to resolve the remaining evidentiary dispute about the attorney’s actual authority to settle

the case. See 277 F.3d at 545-46.

Vacated and remanded.
Exhibit 32



               OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2005 of Tix Corporation (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

   (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                  /s/ MITCHELL J. FRANCIS
Date:  September 9, 2005                     By:  ___________________________
                                                  Mitchell J. Francis
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer



   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 728 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 728

 To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to increase the 
  maximum term of imprisonment for offenses involving stolen firearms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 1999

 Mr. Campbell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to increase the 
  maximum term of imprisonment for offenses involving stolen firearms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STOLEN FIREARMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 924 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``(i), (j),''; 
                and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(7) Whoever knowingly violates subsection (i) or (j) of section 
922 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 15 years, 
or both.'';
            (2) in subsection (i)(1), by striking ``10 years'' and 
        inserting ``15 years''; and
            (3) in subsection (l), by striking ``10 years'' and 
        inserting ``15 years''.
    (b) Sentencing Commission.--The United States Sentencing Commission 
shall amend the Federal sentencing guidelines to reflect the amendments 
made by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**WASHINGTON, DC 20549**

**FORM 10‐K**

** **

** **

| x | **ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| **For the Fiscal Year Ended:** | **December 31, 2009** |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------|

** **

**OR**

** **

| o | **TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| **For the transition period from** | **to**       | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|--------------|------------|
| **Commission File Number:**        | **001-6064** | ** ** |

 

 

| **ALEXANDER’S, INC.**                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
| **(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)** |

 

 

| **Delaware**                                                  |   | **51-0100517**                    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incoporation or organization) |   | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| **210 Route 4 East, Paramus, New Jersey**                     |   | **07652**                         |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                      |   | (Zip Code)                        |

 

 

| Registrant’s telephone number, including area code | **(201)****587-8541** |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

| **Title of each class**              |   | **Name of each exchange on which registered** |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Common Stock, $1 par value per share |   | New York Stock Exchange                       |

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Exchange Act.YES o NO x

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act. YES o NO x

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10817]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Jones) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  (Mr. JONES addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.)

                          ____________________
```