alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          11,150
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,217<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    104,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,363
<PP&E>                                         231,314<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 513,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          152,136
<BONDS>                                        318,814
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,611)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   513,297
<SALES>                                        539,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               539,279
<CGS>                                          508,972
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (5,448)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (43,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,578
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (45,865)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   9,785
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,522)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (37,602)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNTS PRESENTED ARE NET.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350


     The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the First Quarter ended March 31, 2004 of Nanobac Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated
(the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                    /s/ Alexander H Edwards III
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Alexander H Edwards
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    May 17, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nanobac Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



<
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 05, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 05, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0229. CRUMP HEATING & AIR, LLC et al. v. ARTHUR D. BLANTON et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2014CV2614
III 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 297 

Congratulating the Minnesota Lynx on their victory in the 2015 Women’s 

National Basketball Association Finals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2015 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. FRANKEN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Minnesota Lynx on their victory in the 

2015 Women’s National Basketball Association Finals. 

Whereas, on October 14, 2015, the Minnesota Lynx won the 

2015 Women’s National Basketball Association (commonly known as the ‘‘WNBA’’) championship by beating 

the Indiana Fever 69 to 52 in game 5 at home in Minneapolis; 

Whereas this is the third WNBA championship for the Minnesota Lynx in 5 years; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx have competed in 4 out of the 

last 5 WNBA Finals; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx finished the 2015 season with 

an impressive 22 wins; 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 297 ATS 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx beat the Los Angeles Sparks in 

the Western Conference Semifinals, swept the Phoenix 

Mercury in the Western Conference Finals, and decisively 

beat the Indiana Fever in the fifth game of the WNBA 

Finals; 

Whereas a franchise record 18,933 fans attended the clinching game at the Target Center in Minneapolis to cheer 

on the Minnesota Lynx; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx— 

(1) benefit from stellar leadership from Head Coach 

Cheryl Reeve and Assistant Coaches Jim Petersen and 

Shelley Patterson; 

(2) feature 5 gold medal-winning athletes, Lindsey 

Whalen, Maya Moore, Seimone Augustus, Asjha Jones, 

and Sylvia Fowles, the Finals MVP; and 

(3) have on the roster highly talented professionals, 

including Rebekkah Brunson, Renee Montgomery, Anna 

Cruz, Shae Kelley, Tricia Liston, Kalana Greene, and 

Devereaux Peters; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx are 1 of only 4 WNBA teams 

to win 3 or more WNBA championships; and 

Whereas all 3 of the WNBA championships won by the Lynx 

have come under the coaching of Cheryl Reeve: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes— 

2 (1) the achievements of the players, coaches, 

3 fans, and staff whose dedication helped the Min4 nesota Lynx win the 2015 WNBA championship; 

5 and 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 297 ATS 

1 (2) the Twin Cities area and the State of Min2 nesota for enthusiastically supporting women’s pro3 fessional basketball. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2270-E2271]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

     RECOGNIZING JUDY THEIN AND TEAM DUI OF LAKE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MIKE THOMPSON

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Madam Speaker, I rise to honor Judy Thein 
and Team DUI of Lake County for their incredible service to the 
community. Team DUI is doing visionary work to address underage 
drinking through prevention.
  Team DUI was born out of tragedy. After her daughter's death in a 
drunk driving accident, Clearlake Vice Mayor Judy Thein has turned the 
heartbreak of her loss into a positive effort that is already making a 
difference in the community. Team DUI brings together a coalition of 
law enforcement, county officials, social service providers and local 
educators to teach teens about the dangers of underage drinking and 
driving under the influence.
  Team DUI's program is designed to help people understand the 
consequences of the decisions they make. They provide educational 
forums throughout the county, encouraging prevention through teamwork, 
community prevention and problem solving. By their actions, they have 
demonstrated their willingness to go to great lengths to spread their 
message.
  Team DUI has received numerous well-deserved honors for their work. 
In 2008 alone, they have received Mothers Against Drunk Driving's 
Advocate Recognition award and the Best Idea of the Year Award from 
Stars of Lake County, among many others.
  Madam Speaker, it is appropriate at this time that we thank Judy 
Thein and everyone

[[Page E2271]]

at Team DUI for the remarkable work they have done for our community. 
This program has been remarkably successful in a short period of time, 
and I know that we will see much more progress in the years to come.

                          ____________________
```
May 26, 2009

Shaheerah Kelly 

USEPA REGION 9 

75 Hawthorne Street Mail Code: AIR-3 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

Dear Ms Kelly,

NRG West has submitted an application to the California Energy Commission (Docket Number: 

07-AFC-06) to build a 558 megawatt power plant in coastal Carlsbad, California named the 

Carlsbad Energy Center Project (CECP) and has requested authorization to emit up to 72.8 tons 

of NOx per year (though NRG West admits that the new units have the potential to emit 75.6 

tons of NOx per year). NRG "voluntarily" agreed to limit NOx emissions from the 75.6 tons/yr 

to the 72.8 tons/year, probably in order to avoid the 40 ton/year EPA trigger. This new power 

plant will be located on the same property as the existing 55 year-old 963 megawatt Encina 

Power Station that runs approximately 7% per year.

As I understand the rules-Section 52.21(b)(48) - concerning a new stationary source of air 

pollution, limits are placed on new applicants for permission to emit air pollution. At its 

soonest, the CECP will not begin construction until 2010 which means the previous 5 years of 

look-back (2005-2009) push the new application over the limit of 40 tons of emissions of NOx 

per year. Based on the 2005-2009 years, the new CECP would emit 25% more than the 

threshold allows. This would require NRG to submit to the EPA for a Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) of air quality. Please require them to do so.

As the protector of environmental quality, the residents of Carlsbad rely on the EPA to enforce 

Federal air quality rules. It is imperative that NRG West be forced to comply with rules in place 

to protect the public. Other electrical generating assets are coming on-line in San Diego County 

that will provide for demand. There is every reason to make sure that all rules are being 

followed by the addition of CECP to the City of Carlsbad and the region. 

Thank you, I look forward to hearing from you and can provide additional information if needed.

Sincerely,

Julie Baker

Power of Vision

Cc: Senator Barbara Boxer

PO Box 131302

Carlsbad, CA 92013

760.729.4068

powerofvision@roadrunner.com
Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO

ALABAMA NATIONAL BANCORPORATION

1999 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

This
Amendment Two is hereby made as of this 16th day of August, 2006, by Alabama National BanCorporation (the Corporation).

WHEREAS, the Corporation has heretofore established the Alabama National BanCorporation 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan (the Plan); and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has the ability and the right to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 11 therein.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as described below:

1. Section 4 of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the fourth paragraph thereof and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

In the event of any merger, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, stock dividend, or other change in corporate structure
affecting the Stock, a substitution or adjustment shall be made in the aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan, in the number and option price of shares subject to outstanding Stock Options granted under the Plan and in the
number of shares subject to Restricted Stock awards granted under the Plan as determined to be equitable and proportionate by the Committee, provided that the number of shares subject to any award shall always be a whole number. Such adjusted option
price shall also be used to determine the amount payable by the Company upon the exercise of any Stock Appreciation Right associated with any Stock Option.

2. All other terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan not herein modified shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment Two to be executed by its duly authorized officer.



ALABAMA NATIONAL BANCORPORATIONBy:

/s/ Richard Murray IVIts:

President and Chief Operating Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10418]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   UNANIMOUS-CONSENT REQUEST--S. 3507

  Mr. REID. I ask unanimous consent that the Finance Committee be 
discharged from further consideration of S. 3507 and that the Senate 
proceed to its immediate consideration, that the Reed of Rhode Island 
amendment at the desk be considered and agreed to, the bill, as 
amended, be read a third time and passed, the motion to reconsider be 
laid on the table, and there be no intervening action or debate.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  Mr. ALLARD. Mr. President, I object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.
  Mr. REID. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. HAGEL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. HAGEL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I be allowed 
to speak--I assume we are in morning business.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. We are in morning business.
  Mr. HAGEL. For up to 20 minutes.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. HAGEL. Mr. President, thank you. I am very pleased you are in the 
chair this afternoon. For those who are not aware of the fact that 
Nebraska's entire Senate delegation is on the Senate floor today, one 
who will soon become the senior Senator is presiding. So, thank you, 
Mr. President.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JULY 30, 2000 AND APRIL 30, 2000 (unaudited)
AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
JULY 30, 2000 AND JULY 25, 1999 (unaudited) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000926295
<NAME> BOSTON RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-29-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                       1,917,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    360,861
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,399,852
<PP&E>                                       9,118,557
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,409,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,307,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,398,237
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,602
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,376,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,307,181
<SALES>                                      4,853,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,866,190
<CGS>                                        1,002,701
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,692,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,807
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7730

THOMAS W. CAUDLE,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, 

District Judge. (2:08-cv-00604-RBS-TEM)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 23, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas W. Caudle, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas W. Caudle seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); 

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Caudle has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 
3

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 139—2253.

#### Ira Brown v. Charles C. Young.

This was an action to recover back money paid upon a contract for the purchase of real estate, upon the ground that appellant made false and fraudulent representations to appellee, who was the purchaser, that he owned the property and his title was straight as a string, and would furnish an abstract showing it. After appellant had received §30 of appellee, he let appellee have the abstract, which showed that appellant had no legal title to the property which he had agreed to sell. That appellant knew he had no such title, at the time of the representation, is clear beyond doubt. Hpon these facts appellee was entitled to rescind the contract and recover back what he had paid.

Judge below, John G. Rogers.

Attorneys, for appellant, Mr. C. Stuart Beattie; for appellee, Mr. Fred. H. Atwood.

Opinion filed Feb. 17, 1886.

Opinion Per Curiam.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10399]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              S E N A T E

Vol. 154

WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2008

No. 160
```
Exhibit 13.2




Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Enacted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






Cream Minerals Ltd. (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”).




I, Angela Yap, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Angela Yap


Angela Yap


Chief Financial Officer






September 29, 2011
##### 



SUBSIDIARIES OF WASTE SERVICES, INC.
 JURISDICTION OFNAME
    
    INCORPORATION
    
    OPERATING/TRADE NAMES6045341 Canada Inc.
    
    Canada
    
    n/aCactus Waste Systems, LLC
    
    Arizona
    
    n/aCapital Environmental Holdings Company
    
    Nova Scotia (Canada)
    
    n/aFort Bend Regional Landfill LP
    
    Texas
    
    n/aJacksonville Florida Landfill, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    n/aJones Road Landfill and Recycling Ltd.
    
    Florida
    
    n/aLiberty Waste, LLC
    
    Florida
    
    n/aOmni Waste of Osceola County LLC
    
    Ohio
    
    n/aPro Disposal, Inc.
    
    Florida
    
    n/aRam-Pak Compaction Systems Ltd.
    
    Canada
    
    Waste Check (expires Sept. 13/07)Ruffino Hills Transfer Station LP
    
    Texas
    
    n/aSanford Recycling and Transfer, Inc.
    
    Florida
    
    n/aSun Country Materials, LLC
    
    Florida
    
    n/aTaft Recycling, Inc.
    
    Florida
    
    n/aWaste Services (CA) Inc.
    
    Ontario (Canada)
    
    A & B Portables (expires Feb.21/11)Extra-Provincially
Incorporated in:
    
    Capital Environmental Resource (expires Feb.22/11)Alberta
British Columbia
    
    Frith Regional Waste Systems (expires Feb.22/11)Manitoba
Quebec
    
    Johns Cartage Waste Management Services (expiresSaskatchewan
    
    Feb.22/11)Larue Waste & Recycling (expires Feb.22/11)Maverick Waste Systems (expires Feb.22/11)McGill Environmental Services (expires Feb.22/11)Muskoka Containerized Services (expires Feb.22/11)Waste Services (expires Feb.22/11)WSI (expires Feb.22/11)Turney Disposal (expires July 2011)Nibourg Waste Management (expires Nov.1/11)Waste Services Limited Partner, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    n/aWaste Services of Alabama, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    n/a
 Page 1 of 2




---



##### 



JURISDICTION OFNAME
    
    INCORPORATION
    
    OPERATING/TRADE NAMESWaste Services of Arizona, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    Arizona Waste Services (expires 20/07/09)Dell Waste Systems (expires 07/11/08)ABC Disposal (expires 21/05/06) letting expireComplete Waste Services (expires 02/04/09)Waste Services of Florida Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    Florida Recycling ServicesWS General Partner, LLC
    
    Texas
    
    n/aWSI Waste Services of Texas, LP
    
    Texas
    
    n/a
 Page 2 of 2