alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 417

To amend title 28 of the United States Code to bar any civil trial involving

the President until after the President vacates office, but to allow for

sealed discovery during the time the President is in office.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28 of the United States Code to bar any

civil trial involving the President until after the President

vacates office, but to allow for sealed discovery during

the time the President is in office.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CIVIL ACTIONS INVOLVING THE PRESIDENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part 6 of title 28, United States

5 Code is amended by inserting after chapter 161 the follow6 ing:
2

•S 417 IS

1 ‘‘CHAPTER 162—CIVIL ACTIONS

2 INVOLVING THE PRESIDENT

‘‘Sec. 2431. Civil actions involving the president.

3 ‘‘§ 2431. Civil action involving the president

4 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION.—In this chapter, the term ‘party’

5 means a plaintiff or defendant.

6 ‘‘(b) CIVIL TRIAL BARRED.—Any individual serving

7 as President may not be a party in a trial on a civil action.

8 ‘‘(c) DISCOVERY AND PRE TRIAL ACTIONS.—

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para10 graph (2), this section does not apply to any discov11 ery or pretrial action in a civil action that is carried

12 out in a manner consistent with—

13 ‘‘(A) reasonable case management prin14 ciples; and

15 ‘‘(B) due deference to Presidential respon16 sibilities.

17 ‘‘(2) DISCOVERY UNDER SEAL.—Any discovery

18 matter in a civil action described in this section

19 shall—

20 ‘‘(A) be filed with the court of jurisdiction

21 under seal; and

22 ‘‘(B) not be available to the public until—
3

•S 417 IS

1 ‘‘(i) the individual described in sub2 section (b) has vacated the office of the

3 President; or

4 ‘‘(ii) all parties to the civil action

5 agree to release the discovery matter.’’.

6 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters

7 for part VI of title 28, United States Code, is amended

8 by inserting after the item for chapter 161 the following:

‘‘162. Civil action involving the President ............................... 2431’’.

Æ
1 

# MEMORANDUM

Eastern Research Group, Inc.
110 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421

Date: February 18, 2011
To: Brian D’Amico, EPA
From: Cal Franz, ERG Re: Directions for Downloading Aircraft Departu re Data from the Bureau of Transportation
Statistics Website

1. Go to Bureau of Transportation Statistics website: http://www.bts.gov/ . On the left hand side of the page, the second box from the top is titled: Airlines and Airports ; in this box, find the subheading
“Generate Tables” and click on the fourth bullet: “More Databases”.

2. This takes you to a page titled: Data Library: Aviation . On this page, select and click on the third database from the top of the list: “ Air Carrier Statistics (Form 41 Traffic)- All Carriers ”.\

3. The next page is titled: Database Name: Air Carrier Statistics (Form 41 Traffic)- All Carriers ; on this page, click on the last table on the list: “ T-100 Segment (All Carriers) ”

4. This takes you to a page titled: Air Carriers : T-100 Segment (All Carriers) . Find the Field Name: “DepPerformed” (2 nd from top under “Summaries”); to the right on the Departures Performed row, click on

“ Analysis ”

5. The next page, Air Carriers : T-100 Segment (All Carriers) , might take some time to load, and should be
subtitled: Sum : Departures Performed by UniqueCarrier for 2010

.

6. On this page, you must go to the box in the left hand column of the page and under the heading “Analysis Type”, click on the fourth selection from the top: “Crosstabs”.

7. Now you specify the settings from the five dropdown boxes to obtain the results you need:

Filter Rows: select “Origin”

Filter Columns: select “AircraftGr oup”

Filter Variables: select “DepPerformed”

Filter Statistics: select “Sum”

Filter Years: select the year necessary for the analysis

Click on “Recalculate”. The resu lting table is approximately 1600 rows (one for each airport) and 11
columns.

 The left hand column lists the three character alpha-numeric U.S. Department of Transportation airport code in alphabetic order.2  The next nine columns list departures by “Air craftGroup”, for each airport using the following

codes:

0: Piston, 1-Engine/Combined Single Engine (Piston/Turbine) 1: Piston, 2-Engine 2: Piston, 3-Engine/4-Engine 3: Helicopter/Stol 4: Turbo-Prop, 1-Engine/2-Engine 5: Turbo-Prop, 4-Engine 6: Jet, 2-Engine 7: Jet, 3-Engine 8: Jet, 4-Engine/6-Engine

 The final column lists total departures for the airport.

Rather than laboriously scrolling through the list of airports, the table can be searched by airport id. In the left hand column under TransStats you can cl ick on the “Search Rows” box, enter the airport id in the text box immediately below, then click “Go”.

To calculate the number of jet departures for EPA’s threshold, you must sum departures under codes 6, 7 and 8.

The table only shows six columns at a time; at the t op of the table, on the left hand side (just above the column of airport ids) you may need to clic k “next” to ensure all jet departures are listed.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 771

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the memorialization

at the columbarium at Arlington National Cemetery of veterans who

have donated their remains to science, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 13, 1999

Mr. ROBB introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the

memorialization at the columbarium at Arlington

National Cemetery of veterans who have donated their

remains to science, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 771 IS

1 SECTION 1. MEMORIALIZATION AT COLUMBARIUM AT AR2 LINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY OF VET3 ERANS WHO HAVE DONATED THEIR REMAINS

4 TO SCIENCE.

5 (a) AUTHORITY TO MEMORIALIZE.—(1) Chapter 24

6 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at

7 the end the following:

8 ‘‘§ 2412. Arlington National Cemetery: memorializa9 tion at columbarium of veterans who

10 have donated their remains to science

11 ‘‘The Secretary of the Army may honor, by marker

12 or other appropriate means at the columbarium at Arling13 ton National Cemetery, the memory of any veteran eligible

14 for inurnment in the columbarium whose cremated re15 mains cannot be inurned in the columbarium as a result

16 of the donation of the veteran’s organs or remains for

17 medical or scientific purposes.’’.

18 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of that

19 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘2412. Arlington National Cemetery: memorialization at columbarium of veterans who have donated their remains to science.’’.

20 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Section 2412 of title 38, United

21 States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply to

22 veterans who die on or after January 1, 1996.

Æ
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10678]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  CORRECTING ENROLLMENT OF H.R. 6063, NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE 
                ADMINISTRATION AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2008

  Mr. LAMPSON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to take from the 
Speaker's table the Senate concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 105) 
directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to correct the 
enrollment of H.R. 6063, and ask for its immediate consideration.
  The Clerk read the title of the Senate concurrent resolution.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Texas?
  There was no objection.
  The text of the Senate concurrent resolution is as follows:

                             S.Con Res. 105

       Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 
     concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 6063, an 
     Act to authorize the programs of the National Aeronautics and 
     Space Administration, and for other purposes, the Clerk of 
     the House of Representatives shall make the following 
     corrections:
       In section 601(b)(2)(A)(iii) of the bill, strike 
     ``Orbiter''.
       In section 611(d)(1) of the bill, strike ``first 
     President'' and insert ``President''.
       In section 611(e)(3) of the bill, strike ``correctly'' and 
     insert ``currently''.
       In section 611(e)(7) of the bill, strike ``extention'' and 
     insert ``extension''.
       In section 612 of the bill, strike ``operations'' and 
     insert ``operational''.
       In section 1119 of the bill, strike ``The Report'' and 
     insert ``The report''.

  The Senate concurrent resolution was concurred in.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________
```
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of ING Insurance
Company of America (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the officer's
knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                  By
-----------------                    ------------------------------------------
      (Date)                         David A. Wheat
                                     Director, Senior Vice President, and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 Subsidiaries                                                    Jurisdiction
 ------------                                                    -------------
 <C> <S>                                                         <C>
 1.  B.N. Technology, Inc. dba ICOM............................  California
 2.  Digiweb, Inc. ............................................  Maryland
     Web Provider, Inc.........................................  Maryland
 3.  Interliant Consulting and Professional Services, Inc. ....  Massachusetts
     Interliant Managed Application Solutions, Inc.
      (formerly reSOURCE PARTNER, Inc.)........................  Delaware
     rSP Insurance Agency, Inc. ...............................  Ohio
     Soft Link Holding Corp....................................  Delaware
     Soft Link, Inc............................................  Minnesota
 4.  Interliant International, Inc. ...........................  Delaware
     Interliant Europe B.V.....................................  Netherlands
     Interliant GmbH...........................................  Germany
     Interliant SAS............................................  France
     Interliant UK Holdings Limited (formerly Sales Technology
     Limited) .................................................  England
     Interliant UK Limited (formerly Sales Success Limited)....  England
     Interliant Acquisition Corp. (formerly Sage Networks
 5.  Acquisition Corp.)........................................  Delaware
 6.  Interliant Association Solutions, Inc.....................  Delaware
 7.  Interliant Texas, Inc.....................................  Delaware
     Milestone Services, Inc. .................................  Texas
 8.  The Jacobson Consulting Group, Inc........................  Delaware
 9.  Telephonetics, Inc........................................  Delaware
</TABLE>
EPA and ASTSWMO Meeting

April 4, 2013

Attendees

EPA – Mark Barolo, Linda Gerber, Liz McDermott, Paul Miller, Andrea Barbery

ASTSWMO – Charles Reyes

States

NY – Russ Brauksieck

NH – Michael Juranty

DE – Becky Keyser and Jill Hall

TN – Lamar Bradley

UT – Theron Blatter

CO – Mahesh Alburquerque

MN – Jeff Brandon and Mike Rynders

TX – Doug R

OK – Terri Roberts

MO – Ken Koons

OR – Mitch Scheel

CA – Laura Fisher

EPA and states met to discuss a number of issues from the proposed revisions to the UST 

regulations. The discussion included the definitions, compatibility, and closure.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCTOBER 26, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 10-12533

 

D. C. Docket No. 2:07-cv-01928-RDP

LAURA FAUGHT,

STEVEN FAUGHT,

on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

JOHN HOWE, et al.,

Intervenors-Plaintiffs,

MIRIAM CHAPON,

JOHN CHAPON,

Intervenor-PlaintiffsAppellants,

versus

AMERICAN HOME SHIELD CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

TODD PETTITT,

SHARON LEE,

Interested-Parties-Appellants.
 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

 

(October 26, 2011)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, CARNES, Circuit Judge, and SANDS, District *

Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Consolidated Objecting Class Members (the “objectors”) appeal the district

court’s order denying an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Even putting aside timeliness issues presented by the Appellees, the

objectors are entitled to attorneys’ fees only in the event that they can show either

(1) that they conferred some benefit on the class or (2) that they substantially

improved the settlement under consideration. See, e.g., Uselton v. Commercial

Lovelace, Inc., 9 F.3d 849, 855 (10th Cir. 1993); City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.,

560 F.2d 1093, 1098 (2d Cir. 1977). The burden is on the objectors to show one

of these criteria has been met. The district court, in a well reasoned opinion,

concluded that they had not carried that burden.

Honorable W. Louis Sands, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, *

sitting by designation.

2
This court reviews such findings for abuse of discretion. Haitian Refugee

Ctr. v. Meese, 791 F.2d 1489, 1496 (11th Cir. 1986). The district court laid out in

detail how the objectors’ claims were based on speculation that is unsupported by

the record. We agree with these findings; therefore, we conclude that the district

court did not abuse its discretion and affirm the denial of attorneys’ fees and costs.

AFFIRMED. 

3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0260 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DANIELLE WOOD,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 8, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2022

04/29/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0260
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 832

To extend the commercial space launch damage indemnification provisions

of section 70113 of title 49, United States Code.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 20, 1999

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. FRIST, Mr. BURNS, Mr. BREAUX, and Mr.

LOTT) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To extend the commercial space launch damage indemnification provisions of section 70113 of title 49, United States

Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY IN4 DEMNIFICATION EXTENSION.

5 Section 70113(f) of title 49, United States Code, is

6 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 1999.’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘December 31, 2009’’.

Æ
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 874

To repeal the reduction in the deductible portion of expenses for business

meals and entertainment.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 26, 1999

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To repeal the reduction in the deductible portion of expenses

for business meals and entertainment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REDUCTION IN BUSINESS MEALS

4 AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX DEDUCTION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274(n)(1) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to only 50 percent of meal

7 and entertainment expenses allowed as deduction) is

8 amended by striking ‘‘50 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘the ap9 plicable percentage’’.
2

•S 874 IS

1 (b) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE.—Section 274(n) of

2 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking

3 paragraph (3) and inserting the following:

4 ‘‘(3) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE.—For purposes

5 of paragraph (1), the term ‘applicable percentage’

6 means the percentage determined under the fol7 lowing table:

‘‘For taxable years beginning The applicable

in calendar year— percentage is—

1999 ......................................................................................... 56

2000 ......................................................................................... 62

2001 ......................................................................................... 68

2002 ......................................................................................... 74

2003 or thereafter .................................................................... 80.’’

8 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading for

9 section 274(n) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is

10 amended by striking ‘‘ONLY 50 PERCENT’’ and inserting

11 ‘‘PORTION’’.

12 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

14 December 31, 1998.

Æ
Exhibit 99B

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
David Garofalo, Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited ("Agnico-Eagle"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F of Agnico-Eagle for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Agnico-Eagle.

|                              |  | by: | /s/DAVID GAROFALO                                                 
|----------------------------- |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                              |  |     | David Garofalo Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|Toronto, Canada,
May 10, 2004 |  |     |                                                                   

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Agnico-Eagle and will be retained by Agnico-Eagle and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

43

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10645]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Clerk of the House of Representatives:

                                              Office of the Clerk,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                  Washington, DC, October 1, 2008.
     Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
     The Speaker, The Capitol,
     House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to the permission granted in 
     Clause 2(h) of Rule II of the Rules of the U.S. House of 
     Representatives, the Clerk received the following message 
     from the Secretary of the Senate on October 1, 2008, at 9:34 
     a.m.:
       That the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 1594.
       That the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 1714.
       That the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 4544.
       That the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 6045.
       That the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 6073.
       That the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 6083.
       That the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 6353.
       That the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 6524.
       That the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 6531.
       That the Senate passed without amendment H.R. 7084.
       That the Senate concurs in the House amendments S. 431.
       That the Senate concurs in the House amendments S. 1492.
       That the Senate passed S. 3197.
       That the Senate passed S. 3658.
       Appointments:
       Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance.
       With best wishes, I am
           Sincerely,
                                               Lorraine C. Miller,
                                               Clerk of the House.

                          ____________________
```