86070 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices 

7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3The Exchange originally filed to amend the Fee 

Schedule on October 1, 2024 (SR–NYSE–2024–62). 

SR–NYSE–2024–62 was subsequently withdrawn 

and replaced by this filing. 

4See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 

(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) 

(File No. S7–10–04) (Final Rule) (‘‘Regulation 

NMS’’). 

5See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358, 

75 FR 3594, 3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7– 

02–10) (Concept Release on Equity Market 

Structure). 

6See Cboe U.S Equities Market Volume 

Summary, available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/ 

equities/market_share. See generally https://

www.sec.gov/fast-answers/divisionsmarketregmr

exchangesshtml.html. 

7See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at 

https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/

AtsIssueData. A list of alternative trading systems 

registered with the Commission is available at 

https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to file 

number SR–CboeEDGX–2024–059. This 

file number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 10 

a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also 

will be available for inspection and 

copying at the principal office of the 

Exchange. Do not include personal 

identifiable information in submissions; 

you should submit only information 

that you wish to make available 

publicly. We may redact in part or 

withhold entirely from publication 

submitted material that is obscene or 

subject to copyright protection. All 

submissions should refer to file number 

SR–CboeEDGX–2024–059 and should be 

submitted on or before November 19, 

2024. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.7

Sherry R. Haywood, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024–25055 Filed 10–28–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–101408; File No. SR–NYSE– 

2024–65] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New 

York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of 

Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of 

Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its 

Price List 

October 23, 2024. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on October 

10, 2024, New York Stock Exchange 

LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed 

with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) 

the proposed rule change as described 

in Items I, II, and III below, which Items 

have been prepared by the Exchange. 

The Commission is publishing this 

notice to solicit comments on the 

proposed rule change from interested 

persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to amend its 

Price List to modify two adding tiers for 

Midpoint Passive Liquidity (‘‘MPL’’) 

Orders that add liquidity to the 

Exchange. The proposed rule change is 

available on the Exchange’s website at 

www.nyse.com, at the principal office of 

the Exchange, and at the Commission’s 

Public Reference Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of, 

and basis for, the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to amend its 

Price List to modify two adding tiers for 

MPL Orders that add liquidity to the 

Exchange. 

The proposed changes respond to the 

current competitive environment where 

order flow providers have a choice of 

where to direct liquidity-providing 

orders by offering further incentives for 

member organizations to send 

additional displayed liquidity to the 

Exchange. 

The Exchange proposes to implement 

the fee changes effective October 10, 

2024.3

Background 

Current Market and Competitive 

Environment 

The Exchange operates in a highly 

competitive market. The Commission 

has repeatedly expressed its preference 

for competition over regulatory 

intervention in determining prices, 

products, and services in the securities 

markets. In Regulation NMS, the 

Commission highlighted the importance 

of market forces in determining prices 

and SRO revenues and, also, recognized 

that current regulation of the market 

system ‘‘has been remarkably successful 

in promoting market competition in its 

broader forms that are most important to 

investors and listed companies.’’ 4

While Regulation NMS has enhanced 

competition, it has also fostered a 

‘‘fragmented’’ market structure where 

trading in a single stock can occur 

across multiple trading centers. When 

multiple trading centers compete for 

order flow in the same stock, the 

Commission has recognized that ‘‘such 

competition can lead to the 

fragmentation of order flow in that 

stock.’’ 5 Indeed, cash equity trading is 

currently dispersed across 16 

exchanges,6 numerous alternative 

trading systems,7 and broker-dealer 

internalizers and wholesalers, all 

competing for order flow. Based on 

publicly-available information, no 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices 86071 

8See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market 

Volume Summary, available at https://

markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/. 

9See id. 

10See Rule 7.31(d)(3). Limit Order is defined in 

Rule 7.31(a)(2). 

11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 

12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) & (5). 

13See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 

(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37495, 37499 (June 29, 2005) 

(S7–10–04) (Final Rule) (‘‘Regulation NMS’’). 

14See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358, 

75 FR 3594, 3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7– 

02–10) (Concept Release on Equity Market 

Structure). 

single exchange currently has more than 

20% market share.8 Therefore, no 

exchange possesses significant pricing 

power in the execution of cash equity 

order flow. More specifically, the 

Exchange’s share of executed volume of 

equity trades in Tapes A, B and C 

securities is less than 12%.9

The Exchange believes that the evershifting market share among the 

exchanges from month to month 

demonstrates that market participants 

can move order flow, or discontinue or 

reduce use of certain categories of 

products. While it is not possible to 

know a firm’s reason for shifting order 

flow, the Exchange believes that one 

such reason is because of fee changes at 

any of the registered exchanges or nonexchange venues to which the firm 

routes order flow. Accordingly, 

competitive forces compel the Exchange 

to use exchange transaction fees and 

credits because market participants can 

readily trade on competing venues if 

they deem pricing levels at those other 

venues to be more favorable. 

In response to this competitive 

environment, the Exchange has 

established incentives for member 

organizations who submit orders that 

provide liquidity on the Exchange in 

MPL Orders. The proposed fee change is 

designed to enhance incentives to 

member organizations to submit 

additional such liquidity to the 

Exchange. 

Proposed Rule Change 

An MPL Order is defined in Rule 7.31 

as a Limit Order that is not displayed 

and does not route, with a working price 

at the midpoint of the PBBO.10

Currently, the Exchange offers tiered 

credits, among others, of $0.0029 and 

$0.0030, respectively, for member 

organizations that have an average daily 

trading volume (‘‘ADV’’) that adds 

liquidity to the Exchange during the 

billing month (‘‘Adding ADV’’) in MPL 

Orders of at least 25 million shares and 

30 million shares, respectively, 

excluding any liquidity added by a 

Designated Market Maker (‘‘DMM’’). 

The Exchange proposes to modify 

these adding tier credits for MPL 

Orders, as follows. 

First, the Exchange would raise the 

$0.0029 credit to $0.0030. The Exchange 

would also lower the ADV requirement 

from 25 million shares to 20 million 

shares. As proposed, the tier would offer 

a $0.0030 credit for member 

organizations that have an Adding ADV 

in MPL Orders of 20 million shares, 

excluding any liquidity added by a 

DMM. 

Second, the Exchange would raise the 

other tiered credit of $0.0030 to $0.0031. 

The Exchange would also lower the 

ADV requirement from 30 million 

shares to 25 million shares. As 

proposed, this tier would offer a $0.0031 

credit for member organizations that 

have an Adding ADV in MPL Orders of 

at least 25 million shares, excluding any 

liquidity added by a DMM. 

In both instances, the Exchange 

believes that modifying the amount of 

the credit and the minimum share 

requirement would incentivize member 

organizations to trade on the Exchange 

in MPL Orders. Specifically, the 

Exchange believes that increasing the 

credits and lowering volume 

requirements would enable more 

member organizations with high 

volumes of Adding ADV in MPL Orders 

to qualify for the respective tiers, 

especially in high volume months. 

The purpose of the proposed change 

is to provide additional incentives for 

member organizations to qualify for 

higher credits for MPL Orders that add 

liquidity to the Exchange by lowering 

the minimum volume requirement. The 

Exchange believes that the proposal 

would thereby increase liquidity 

providing MPL Orders, which in turn 

would support the quality of price 

discovery on the Exchange and provide 

additional price improvement 

opportunities for incoming orders that 

take liquidity. The Exchange believes 

that by correlating the amount of credits 

to the level of MPL Orders that add 

liquidity sent by a member organization, 

the Exchange’s fee structure would 

incentivize member organizations to 

submit more MPL Orders that add 

liquidity to the Exchange, thereby 

increasing the potential for price 

improvement and execution 

opportunities to incoming marketable 

orders submitted to the Exchange. 

As noted above, the Exchange 

operates in a competitive and 

fragmented market environment, 

particularly as it relates to attracting 

non-marketable orders, which add 

liquidity to the Exchange. Based on the 

profile of liquidity-adding firms 

generally, the Exchange believes that 

additional member organizations could 

qualify for these tiers if they choose to 

direct order flow to the Exchange. 

However, without having a view of 

member organization’s activity on other 

exchanges and off-exchange venues, the 

Exchange has no way of knowing 

whether the proposed rule change 

would result in any member 

organization directing MPL Orders to 

the Exchange in order to qualify for a 

new proposed tier. 

The proposed changes are not 

otherwise intended to address other 

issues, and the Exchange is not aware of 

any significant problems that market 

participants would have in complying 

with the proposed changes. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed rule change is consistent with 

Section 6(b) of the Act,11 in general, and 

furthers the objectives of Sections 

6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,12 in particular, 

because it provides for the equitable 

allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and 

other charges among its members, 

issuers and other persons using its 

facilities and does not unfairly 

discriminate between customers, 

issuers, brokers or dealers. 

As discussed above, the Exchange 

operates in a highly competitive market. 

The Commission has repeatedly 

expressed its preference for competition 

over regulatory intervention in 

determining prices, products, and 

services in the securities markets. In 

Regulation NMS, the Commission 

highlighted the importance of market 

forces in determining prices and SRO 

revenues and, also, recognized that 

current regulation of the market system 

‘‘has been remarkably successful in 

promoting market competition in its 

broader forms that are most important to 

investors and listed companies.’’ 13

While Regulation NMS has enhanced 

competition, it has also fostered a 

‘‘fragmented’’ market structure where 

trading in a single stock can occur 

across multiple trading centers. When 

multiple trading centers compete for 

order flow in the same stock, the 

Commission has recognized that ‘‘such 

competition can lead to the 

fragmentation of order flow in that 

stock.’’ 14

The Proposed Change Is Reasonable 

The proposed modifications to two of 

the Adding Tiers for MPL Orders are 

reasonable because they provide 

additional incentives for member 

organizations to qualify for higher 

credits for adding liquidity in MPL 

Orders by lowering the minimum 

volume requirement, thereby 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
86072 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices 

15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). 

16See Regulation NMS, 70 FR at 37498–99. 

17 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 

18 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

encouraging the submission of 

additional liquidity to a national 

securities exchange. As noted, the 

Exchange believes that the proposed 

enhancements would enable more 

member organizations to add liquidity 

in MPL Orders. Submission of 

additional liquidity to the Exchange 

would promote price discovery and 

transparency and enhance order 

execution opportunities for member 

organizations from the substantial 

amounts of liquidity present on the 

Exchange. All member organizations 

benefit from the greater amounts of 

liquidity that will be present on the 

Exchange, which provides greater 

execution opportunities. 

The Proposal Is an Equitable Allocation 

of Fees 

The Exchange believes the proposal 

equitably allocates its fees among its 

market participants. By providing 

additional incentives for member 

organizations to qualify for an adding 

credit, the proposal would continue to 

encourage member organizations to 

send orders that provide liquidity to the 

Exchange, thereby contributing to robust 

levels of liquidity, which benefits all 

market participants, and promoting 

price discovery and transparency. The 

proposal would also enhance order 

execution opportunities for member 

organizations from the substantial 

amounts of liquidity present on the 

Exchange. All member organizations 

would benefit from the greater amounts 

of liquidity that will be present on the 

Exchange, which would provide greater 

execution opportunities and additional 

price improvement opportunities for 

incoming orders. The Exchange believes 

that by offering higher credits correlated 

to lower volumes of Adding ADV in 

MPL Orders, more member 

organizations will be able to choose to 

route their liquidity-providing orders to 

the Exchange to qualify for the proposed 

credits. As previously noted, based on 

the profile of liquidity-providing 

member organizations generally, the 

Exchange believes additional member 

organizations could qualify for the 

proposed credits if they choose to direct 

order flow to the Exchange. Additional 

liquidity-providing orders benefits all 

market participants because it provides 

greater execution opportunities on the 

Exchange. 

The Proposal Is Not Unfairly 

Discriminatory 

The Exchange believes its proposal is 

not unfairly discriminatory because the 

proposal would be provided on an equal 

basis to all member organizations that 

add liquidity, who would all be eligible 

for the same credits on an equal basis. 

Accordingly, no member organization 

already operating on the Exchange 

would be disadvantaged by this 

allocation of fees. Further, as noted, the 

Exchange believes the proposal would 

provide an incentive for member 

organizations to continue to send orders 

that provide liquidity to the Exchange, 

to the benefit of all market participants. 

For the foregoing reasons, the 

Exchange believes that the proposal is 

consistent with the Act. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of 

the Act,15 the Exchange believes that the 

proposed rule change would not impose 

any burden on competition that is not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act. Instead, as 

discussed above, the Exchange believes 

that the proposed changes would 

encourage the submission of additional 

liquidity to a public exchange, thereby 

promoting market depth, price 

discovery and transparency and 

enhancing order execution 

opportunities for member organizations. 

As a result, the Exchange believes that 

the proposed change furthers the 

Commission’s goal in adopting 

Regulation NMS of fostering integrated 

competition among orders, which 

promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing of 

individual stocks for all types of orders, 

large and small.’’ 16

Intramarket Competition. The 

proposed change is designed to attract 

additional order flow to the Exchange. 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed changes would continue to 

incentivize market participants to direct 

order flow to the Exchange. Greater 

liquidity benefits all market participants 

on the Exchange by providing more 

trading opportunities and encourages 

member organizations to send orders, 

thereby contributing to robust levels of 

liquidity, which benefits all market 

participants on the Exchange. The 

proposed credits would be available to 

all similarly-situated market 

participants, and, as such, the proposed 

change would not impose a disparate 

burden on competition among market 

participants on the Exchange. As noted, 

the proposal would apply to all 

similarly situated member organizations 

on the same and equal terms, who 

would benefit from the changes on the 

same basis. Accordingly, the proposed 

change would not impose a disparate 

burden on competition among market 

participants on the Exchange. 

Intermarket Competition. The 

Exchange operates in a highly 

competitive market in which market 

participants can readily choose to send 

their orders to other exchange and offexchange venues if they deem fee levels 

at those other venues to be more 

favorable. In such an environment, the 

Exchange must continually adjust its 

fees and rebates to remain competitive 

with other exchanges and with offexchange venues. Because competitors 

are free to modify their own fees and 

credits in response, and because market 

participants may readily adjust their 

order routing practices, the Exchange 

does not believe its proposed fee change 

can impose any burden on intermarket 

competition. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

No written comments were solicited 

or received with respect to the proposed 

rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of 

the Act,17 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 

thereunder 18 the Exchange has 

designated this proposal as establishing 

or changing a due, fee, or other charge 

imposed on any person, whether or not 

the person is a member of the selfregulatory organization, which renders 

the proposed rule change effective upon 

filing. At any time within 60 days of the 

filing of the proposed rule change, the 

Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is necessary or appropriate in the 

public interest, for the protection of 

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of 

the purposes of the Act. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s internet 

comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include file number SR– 

NYSE–2024–65 on the subject line. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices 86073 

19 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to file 

number SR–NYSE–2024–65. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549 on official 

business days between the hours of 10 

a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also 

will be available for inspection and 

copying at the principal office of the 

Exchange. Do not include personal 

identifiable information in submissions; 

you should submit only information 

that you wish to make available 

publicly. We may redact in part or 

withhold entirely from publication 

submitted material that is obscene or 

subject to copyright protection. All 

submissions should refer to file number 

SR–NYSE–2024–65, and should be 

submitted on or before November 19, 

2024. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.19

Sherry R. Haywood, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024–25048 Filed 10–28–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

[Disaster Declaration #20658 and #20659; 

CALIFORNIA Disaster Number CA–20024] 

Administrative Declaration of a 

Disaster for the State of California 

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business 

Administration. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an 

Administrative declaration of a disaster 

for the State of California dated 10/23/ 

2024. 

Incident: Bridge Fire. 

Incident Period: 09/08/2024 and 

continuing. 

DATES: Issued on 10/23/2024. 

Physical Loan Application Deadline 

Date: 12/23/2024. 

Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan 

Application Deadline Date: 07/23/2025. 

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan 

Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 

apply for a disaster assistance loan. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 

Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small 

Business Administration, 409 3rd Street 

SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, 

(202) 205–6734. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that as a result of the 

Administrator’s disaster declaration, 

applications for disaster loans may be 

submitted online using the MySBA 

Loan Portal https://lending.sba.gov or 

other locally announced locations. 

Please contact the SBA disaster 

assistance customer service center by 

email at disastercustomerservice@

sba.gov or by phone at 1–800–659–2955 

for further assistance. 

The following areas have been 

determined to be adversely affected by 

the disaster: 

Primary Counties: Los Angeles 

Contiguous Counties: 

California: Kern, Orange, San 

Bernardino, Ventura 

The Interest Rates are: 

Percent 

For Physical Damage: 

Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere ...................... 5.625 

Homeowners without Credit 

Available Elsewhere .............. 2.813 

Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere ...................... 8.000 

Businesses without Credit 

Available Elsewhere .............. 4.000 

Non-Profit Organizations with 

Credit Available Elsewhere ... 3.250 

Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere ..................................... 3.250 

For Economic Injury: 

Business and Small Agricultural 

Cooperatives without Credit 

Available Elsewhere .............. 4.000 

Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere ..................................... 3.250 

The number assigned to this disaster 

for physical damage is 206585 and for 

economic injury is 206590. 

The States which received an EIDL 

Declaration are California. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Number 59008) 

Isabella Guzman, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2024–25063 Filed 10–28–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8026–09–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

[Disaster Declaration #20753 and #20754; 

GEORGIA Disaster Number GA–20014] 

Presidential Declaration Amendment of 

a Major Disaster for Public Assistance 

Only for the State of Georgia 

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business 

Administration. 

ACTION: Amendment 4. 

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the 

Presidential declaration of a major 

disaster for Public Assistance Only for 

the State of Georgia (FEMA–4830–DR), 

dated October 9, 2024. 

Incident: Hurricane Helene. 

DATES: Issued on October 21, 2024. 

Incident Period: September 24, 2024, 

and continuing. 

Physical Loan Application Deadline 

Date: December 9, 2024. 

Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan 

Application Deadline Date: July 9, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan 

Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 

apply for a disaster assistance loan. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 

Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small 

Business Administration, 409 3rd Street 

SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, 

(202) 205–6734. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice 

of the President’s major disaster 

declaration for Private Non-Profit 

organizations in the State of Georgia, 

dated October 9, 2024, is hereby 

amended to include the following areas 

as adversely affected by the disaster. 

Primary Counties: Banks, Bleckley, 

Butts, Clinch, Dawson, Decatur, 

Echols, Elbert, Franklin, Gilmer, 

Greene, Habersham, Hancock, Hart, 

Jackson, Jasper, Lamar, Lanier, 

Lincoln, Lumpkin, Madison, 

Morgan, Oglethorpe, Pike, Putnam, 

Rabun, Stephens, Treutlen, 

Washington, White, Wilkes. 

All other information in the original 

declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Number 59008) 

Rafaela Monchek, 

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of 

Disaster Recovery & Resilience. 

[FR Doc. 2024–25062 Filed 10–28–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8026–09–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES