87852 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 5, 2024 / Notices 

8See Order. 

1See Antidumping Duty Order; Barium Chloride 

from the People’s Republic of China, 49 FR 40635 

(October 17, 1984) (AD Order); and Barium Chloride 

from India: Countervailing Duty Order, 88 FR 14120 

(March 7, 2023) (CVD Order) (collectively, Orders). 

2See Barium Chloride from the People’s Republic 

of China and India: Initiation and Preliminary 

Results of Changed Circumstances Review and 

Intent to Revoke the Antidumping Duty and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 89 FR 76448 

(September 18, 2024) (Initiation and Preliminary 

Results). 

(i.e., 0.00 percent); (2) for merchandise 

exported by producers or exporters not 

covered in this review but covered in a 

prior completed segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the completed segment for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review or another completed segment of 

this proceeding, but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be the companyspecific rate established for the most 

recent completed segment for the 

producer of the merchandise; and (4) 

the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 1.02 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.8 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during the POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

the final results of this review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: October 29, 2024. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

Non-Individually Examined Companies 

Receiving a Review-Specific Rate 

1. 3HQ Surfaces Pvt. Ltd. 

2. Antique Granito Shareholders Trust 

3. Antique Marbonite Pvt Ltd; Prism Johnson 

Limited; Shivam Enterprises 

4. Argil Ceramics 

5. ARO Granite Industries Ltd. 

6. ASI Industries Limited 

7. Asian Granito India Ltd. 

8. Baba Super Minerals Pvt Ltd. 

9. Camrola Quartz Limited 

10. Classic Marble Co Pvt Ltd. 

11. Cuarzo 

12. Divine Surfaces Private Limited 

13. Divya Shakti Granites Ltd. 

14. Divya Shakti Ltd. 

15. Esprit Stones Pvt Ltd. 

16. Evetis Stone Pvt Ltd. 

17. Global Stones Pvt. Ltd. 

18. Global Surfaces Ltd. 

19. Glowstone Industries Pvt Ltd. 

20. Hi Elite Quartz LLP 

21. Imperiaal Granimarmo Pvt Ltd. 

22. Indus Trade and Technology LLC 

23. Internaational Stones India Pvt. Ltd. 

24. Keros Stone LLP 

25. Mahi Granites Pvt Ltd. 

26. Malbros Marbles and Granites Industries 

27. Mountmine Impex Pvt Ltd. 

28. Pacific Industries Ltd. 

29. Pacific Quartz Surfaces LLP 

30. Paradigm Stone India Pvt Ltd. 

31. Pelican Buildmat Pvt Ltd. 

32. Pelican Quartz Stone 

33. QuartzKraft LLP 

34. Renshou Industries 

35. Rocks Forever 

36. Safayar Ceramics Pvt Ltd. 

37. Satya Exports 

38. Shanmukha Exports 

39. Southern Rocks and Minerals Pvt Ltd. 

40. Sunex Stones Pvt Ltd. 

41. Tab India Granites Pvt. Ltd. 

42. Universal Marketing Agencies Private 

Limited 

43. Universal Quartz & Natural Stones Pvt 

Ltd. 

44. Venkata Sri Balaji Quartz Surfaces 

[FR Doc. 2024–25611 Filed 11–4–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–007, C–533–909] 

Barium Chloride From the People’s 

Republic of China and India: Final 

Results of Changed Circumstances 

Reviews and Revocation of the 

Antidumping Duty and Countervailing 

Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is revoking the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on barium 

chloride from the People’s Republic of 

China (China) and the countervailing 

duty (CVD) order on barium chloride 

from India. 

DATES: Applicable November 5, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan Goins, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V (China), and Harrison 

Tanchuck, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VI (India), Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0884 and (202) 482–7421. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 17, 1984, Commerce 

issued the AD order on barium chloride 

from China, and on March 7, 2023, 

Commerce issued the CVD order on 

barium chloride from India.1 On 

September 18, 2024, Commerce 

published the initiation and preliminary 

results of the changed circumstances 

reviews (CCRs) and revocation of the 

Orders pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act), and 19 CFR 351.216(b) and 19 CFR 

351.222.2 We invited interested parties 

to comment on the Preliminary Results. 

Honeywell International Inc 

(Honeywell) submitted comments 

agreeing with the Preliminary Results 

and stating that Commerce’s general 

practice in these cases is to liquidate 

without regard to antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties, and to refund any 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 5, 2024 / Notices 87853 

3See Honeywell’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated 

September 25, 2024 (Case Brief). 

4The scope reflects the HTSUS subheading 

currently in effect. 

5See Initiation and Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 

76449; see also Honeywell’s Letters, ‘‘Barium 

Chloride from the People’s Republic of China: 

Changed Circumstances Review Request,’’ dated 

August 6, 2024 at 3 and Exhibit 1; and ‘‘Barium 

Chloride from India: Changed Circumstances 

Review Request,’’ dated September 5, 2024 at 5 and 

Exhibit 4. 

6See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results 

of Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances 

Review and Revocation, In Part, 76 FR 27634 (May 

12, 2011); Stainless Steel Bar from the United 

Kingdom: Notice of Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review and Revocation of Order, in 

Part, 72 FR 65706 (November 23, 2007); Notice of 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review and Revocation of Order In 

Part: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from Germany, 71 FR 66163 (November 

13, 2006); Notice of Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews and 

Revocation of Orders in Part: Certain CorrosionResistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Canada 

and Germany, 71 FR 14498 (March 22, 2006); and 

Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review, and Determination 

to Revoke Order in Part: Certain Cased Pencils from 

the People’s Republic of China, 68 FR 62428 

(November 4, 2003). 

7See Case Brief at 5; see also Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review and Join Annual Inquiry 

Service List, 88 FR 68098 (October 3, 2023); and 

Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 84784 (December 6, 

2023). 

8See Rescission of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 

84117 (October 22, 2024) (Rescission Notice). 

Honeywell requested that Commerce revoke the 

CVD Order with an effective date of the preliminary 

determination in the underlying investigation, i.e., 

June 17, 2022. See Case Brief at 5. However, 

because the opportunity to request the first 

administrative review occurred in March, 2024, and 

Commerce issued automatic liquidation 

instructions for the period June 17, 2022, through 

December 31, 2023, on June 18, 2024, it is not 

appropriate to make the revocation effective June 

17, 2022. Additionally, Honeywell’s Case Brief was 

submitted prior to the publication of this Rescission 

Notice. Honeywell agrees that Commerce should 

liquidate without regard to antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties, and to refund any estimated 

antidumping and/or countervailing duties, on all 

unliquidated entries of the merchandise covered by 

a revocation that are not covered by the final results 

of an administrative review or automatic 

liquidation instruction. See Case Brief at 4. Because 

entries made under the CVD Order through 

December 31, 2023, are subject to either automatic 

liquidation or liquidation instructions pursuant to 

the Rescission Notice, consistent with Honeywell’s 

request, the effective date of the revocation of the 

CVD Order is January 1, 2024. 

estimated antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties, on all 

unliquidated entries of the merchandise 

covered by a revocation that are not 

covered by the final results of an 

administrative review or automatic 

liquidation instructions. Honeywell, 

therefore, requested that Commerce 

revoke the AD Order with an effective 

date of October 1, 2023, and revoke the 

CVD Order with an effective date of 

June 17, 2022.3 We did not receive 

comments from any other interested 

party. 

Scope of the Orders 

The merchandise covered by the 

Orders is barium chloride, a chemical 

compound having the formulas BaC12 

or BaC12–2H20, currently classifiable 

under subheading 2827.39.4500 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS).4 Although the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of these 

Orders is dispositive. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Reviews and Revocation 

of the Orders 

Because no party submitted 

comments objecting to the Preliminary 

Results of these CCRs, and the record 

contains no further information or 

evidence that weighs against the 

proposed revocations, Commerce 

determines, pursuant to sections 

751(d)(1) and 782(h) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.222(g), that there are changed 

circumstances that warrant revocation 

of the Orders. Specifically, in light of 

Chemical Products Corporation’s (the 

petitioner) lack of objection to these 

CCRs, the petitioner’s indication that it 

does not have an interest in the Orders,5

and the absence of comments from any 

interested party opposing the Initiation 

and Preliminary Results, we find that 

producers accounting for substantially 

all of the production of the domestic 

like product to which the Orders pertain 

lack interest in the relief provided by 

the Orders. Accordingly, we are 

revoking the Orders. 

Application of the Final Results of the 

CCRs 

Section 751(d)(3) of the Act provides 

that ‘‘{a} determination under this 

section to revoke an order . . . shall 

apply with respect to unliquidated 

entries of subject merchandise which 

are entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date determined by the 

administering authority.’’ Commerce’s 

general practice is to instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

or countervailing duties, and to refund 

any estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties on, all 

unliquidated entries of the merchandise 

covered by a revocation that are not 

covered by the final results of an 

administrative review or automatic 

liquidation instruction.6 Consistent with 

our practice, we are applying the final 

results of these CCRs to all unliquidated 

entries of the merchandise covered by 

the AD Order which have been entered, 

or withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after October 1, 

2023, i.e., the day following the last day 

of the period covered by the most 

recently-completed administrative 

review of the AD Order, and that are not 

already subject to automatic liquidation 

instructions; 7 and to all unliquidated 

entries covered by the CVD Order which 

have been entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

January 1, 2024, i.e., the day following 

the last day of the period covered by the 

most recently-completed administrative 

review of the CVD Order, and that are 

not already subject to automatic 

liquidation instructions.8

Instructions to CBP 

Because we determine that there are 

changed circumstances that warrant 

revocation of the Orders, we will 

instruct CBP to discontinue the 

suspension of liquidation and the 

collection of cash deposits of estimated 

antidumping and countervailing duties, 

to liquidate all unliquidated entries that 

were entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, on or after October 1, 2023 

(AD Order) or January 1, 2024 (CVD 

Order), without regard to antidumping 

and countervailing duties, respectively, 

and to refund all antidumping duty and 

countervailing duty cash deposits on all 

such merchandise. 

Commerce intends to issue 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of 

these final results and revocation in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
87854 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 5, 2024 / Notices 

1See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Germany: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 31724 (April 25, 2024) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022–2023,’’ dated August 26, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2022– 

2023 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet 

from Germany,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

5Formerly known as Hydro Aluminium Rolled 

Products GmbH. See Common Alloy Aluminum 

Sheet from Germany: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2022, 88 FR 30087 (May 10, 2023, unchanged in 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Germany: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020–2022, 88 FR 77556 (November 13, 

2023). 

6See Preliminary Results. 

7See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Germany: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 86 FR 13318 (March 8, 2021). 

8For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1), 751(b), and 777(i) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4), 19 CFR 

351.216, and 19 CFR 351.222. 

Dated: October 29, 2024. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2024–25613 Filed 11–4–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–428–849] 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From 

Germany: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

the exporter and producer subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

April 1, 2022, through March 31, 2023. 

DATES: Applicable November 5, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pedersen, Office IV, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2769. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 25, 2024, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results in the 

Federal Register.1 On July 22, 2024, 

Commerce tolled certain deadlines in 

this administrative proceeding by seven 

days.2 On August 26, 2024, Commerce 

extended the deadline for the final 

results of review until October 29, 

2024.3

For a complete description of the 

events that occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.4 Commerce 

conducted this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order is 

common alloy aluminum sheet 

(aluminum sheet) from Germany. For a 

full description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs that interested parties 

filed in this administrative review are 

listed in the appendix to this notice and 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Services System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be assessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

of Review 

We made no changes to the weightedaverage dumping margin that we 

calculated for Speira GmbH (Speira) in 

the Preliminary Results. 

Final Results of Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margin exists for the period, 

April 1, 2022, through March 31, 2023: 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Speira GmbH 5 ............................ 6.44 

Disclosure 

Because Commerce has not modified 

its analysis or calculations from the 

Preliminary Results,6 there are no new 

calculations to disclose for these final 

results of review in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined in these final 

results of this review, and U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) shall 

assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for examined sales to each 

importer to the total entered value of 

those sales. Where an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Pursuant to a refinement to 

Commerce’s assessment practice, for 

subject merchandise that was entered 

into the United States, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption 

during the POR, that was produced or 

exported by Speira GmbH for which 

Speira GmbH did not report the sale in 

its U.S. sales database, we will instruct 

CBP to liquidate the entry of such 

merchandise at the all-others rate (i.e., 

49.40 percent) 7 if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.8

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. If a timely summons is filed at 

the U.S. Court of International Trade, 

the assessment instructions will direct 

CBP not to liquidate relevant entries 

until the time for parties to file a request 

for a statutory injunction has expired 

(i.e., within 90 days of publication). 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1