alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Michael A. Pugh, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mitcham Industries, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting./s/ Michael A. Pugh
Attachment G

Work Sheets used to Calculate Registrant Labor Costs

This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket for EPA ICR #0276.14 available at 

www.regulations.gov, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0617.

NAICS: 325300

Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing

Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate

1

= W $54.34 $28.88 $17.23

Benefits Percentage

2

Lb = B/W 44% 44% 44%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $24.15 $12.83 $7.66

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B =

W(1+Lb)

$78.49 $41.71 $24.89

Overhead Percentage3Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $39.24 $20.86 $12.44

Fully Loaded Hourly

Rate

Wf = Wb + OH

= W + B + OH

$117.73 $62.57 $37.33

1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_325300.htm May 2012 data 

NAICS 325300 - Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing 

Standard Occupational Codes:

Management: 11-0000, Management Occupations

Technical: 19-0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

Clerical: 43-0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations

2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour.

3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth 

Edition, EPA-452-02-001, January 2002, pg. 2-34. The loading for indirect costs is within the 

range of 20-70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
# OSHA Data Call Q4 2018 Not PA
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2239]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          HONORING DAVE WELDON

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. MARIO DIAZ-BALART

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, October 3, 2008

  Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida. Madam Speaker, I rise today to pay 
tribute to my good friend and colleague, Congressman Dave Weldon, who 
is retiring from the House of Representatives after serving the people 
of the 15th district of Florida for 14 years. He has always served his 
constituents with dignity, class, and integrity.
  He has been a great example of a true citizen legislator. He put 
aside successful careers in our Nation's Armed Forces and in private 
practice as a physician to devote many years of his life to public 
service.
  Dave has been a leading national supporter of NASA and other space 
issues. He has been a strong leader in Florida advocating the need to 
invest in NASA and the many benefits it provides our Nation. From his 
service on the Science and Appropriations Committees, he has kept a 
close eye on the space program and ensured Florida's Space Coast plays 
an integral role in national space policy.
  It has been an honor serving with him, and it is a privilege to call 
him a good friend. I wish Dave and his wonderful wife Nancy much 
happiness in the next chapter of their lives.

                          ____________________
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Omar Pimentel

Appellate case number: 01-21-00702-CR

Trial court case number: 2386503

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 7 of Harris County

On December 13, 2021, appellant, through counsel, filed a notice of appeal from the 

trial court’s December 8, 2021 order denying his pre-trial application for writ of habeas 

corpus. On January 4, 2022, the complete appellate record was filed with this Court. After 

a review of the appellate record, the Court determines that it desires briefing. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 31.1.

Accordingly, appellant is ordered to file a brief within twenty days of the date of 

this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 31.1. The State’s brief, if any, is due to be filed no later 

than twenty days from the filing of appellant’s brief.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ April Farris________

  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___January 11, 2022_____
##### 



Exhibit 4.1
  COMMON STOCK 
No.
    
    COMMON STOCK Shares
 Incorporated under the Laws of the State of Delaware
 
      
 Chief Financial Officer
    
    Chief Executive Officerand Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



LIME ENERGY CO.
   TEN COM
    
    -
    
    as tenants in common
    
    UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -  CustodianTEN ENT
    
    -
    
    as tenants by the entireties
    
    (Cust)                           (Minor)JT TEN
    
    -
    
    as joint tenants with right
    
    under Uniform Gifts to Minorsof survivorship and not as
    
    Acttenants in common
    
    (State)
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS
ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE
CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE
WHATSOEVER.
 SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN
ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND
CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED
SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM). PURSUANT
TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 13, 2014

No. 04-14-00508-CV

Rudy MENDEZ,

Appellant

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-08659

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Appellant has filed an affidavit of indigence. The clerk, court reporter, or any party who 

desires to challenge appellant’s claim of indigence is hereby ORDERED to do so by filing a 

contest to the affidavit in the trial court no later than ten days from the date of this order. TEX. R.

APP. P. 20.1(e).

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(h)(4), we abate this case to 

the trial court:

A. To conduct a hearing or sign an order extending the time to 

conduct a hearing within ten days after the contest is filed; provided, however, 

that the time for conducting a hearing on the contest must not be extended for 

more than twenty days from the date the trial court signs its order extending the 

time to conduct the hearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(i)(2),(3) and

B. To determine whether or not the appeal is frivolous if no contest is 

filed or if a contest is overruled. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 

13.003 (West 2002).
The trial court is hereby ORDERED to prepare a written order and written findings of 

fact and conclusions of law regarding its indigence determination and its determination with 

regard to whether the appeal is frivolous.

 The trial court clerk is hereby ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record as soon as 

practicable after the trial court enters its order and written findings and conclusions but in no 

event later than 60 days from the date of this order, containing: (1) the contest or a certificate 

stating no contest was filed: (2) the trial court’s order; (3) the trial court’s findings of fact and 

conclusions of law; (4) the judgment being appealed; (5) any post-judgment motions; (6) the 

notice of appeal; and (7) the court’s docket sheet; provided, however, that if the trial court 

sustains the contest, and the appellant files a motion in this court seeking review of the trial 

court’s order, the supplemental clerk’s record must be filed no later than three days from 

the date the appellant files his motion seeking review.

The court reporter is hereby ORDERED to file a reporter’s record of the hearing as soon 

as practicable but in no event later than sixty days from the date of this order; provided, 

however, that if the trial court sustains the contest, and the appellant files a motion in this 

court seeking review of the trial court’s order, the reporter’s record of the hearing must be 

filed no later than three days from the date the appellant files his motion seeking review.

It is so ORDERED on November 13, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Joe K. McArthur, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SouthFirst Bancshares, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained inSEC Release 34-47986]  c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        February 14, 2005 /s/ Joe K. McArthur   Joe K. McArthur   Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Electric City Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey R. Mistarz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  3.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and4.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 31, 2005 /s/ Jeffrey R. MistarzJeffrey R. MistarzChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Electric City Corp. and will be retained by Electric City Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 50
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert F. Woods, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IKON Office Solutions, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of IKON Office Solutions, Inc;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such internal controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent financial quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: December 10, 2004



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ROBERT F. WOODS                                           
|Robert F. Woods Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. JOHN HOOPER.

(Same syllabus as In preceding case.)

INDICTMENT for an Affray, tried at Fall Term, 1879, of JacicsoN Superior Court, before *Graves, J.*

The defendant and one Monroe Hooper were indicted in the usual form for an affray, in mutually assaulting and beating each other, and there was evidence that the offence charged was committed more than six months before indictment found. The jury returned a verdict of guilty against the defendant, and his counsel thereupon moved in arrest of judgment on the ground that the bill did not state that a deadly weapon had been used, nor the offence committed more than six months before the bill was found. Motion overruled, judgment, appeal by defendant.

*Attorney General*and *G. S. Ferguson,*(who also appeared in the preceding case,) for the State.

*Mr. Kope Elias,*for the defendant.

Ashe, J.

It has been decided in *State*v. *Moore, ante,*659, that the superior courts have concurrent jurisdiction with justices of the peace of all affrays, assaults, and assaults and batteries where a justice has not within six months after the commission of the offence proceeded to take official cognizance of the same; and in framing the bill of indictment it is not necessary to charge that the offence was committed more than six months before the finding of the bill, and that no cognizance has been taken of the same by a justice of the peace; that that was matter of defence which went to the jurisdiction of the court, and like the plea of the statute of limitations might be taken advantage of by the defendant on the trial under the plea of “ not guilty.” On this *664authority there was no error in the ruling of the -court below upon the motion in arrest of judgment.

Let this be certified to 'the superior court of Jackson county that further proceedings may be had agreeably to this opinion.

Per Curiam. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,602,620
<SECURITIES>                                 3,417,789
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,058,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                   121,705
<INVENTORY>                                     48,661
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,021,434
<PP&E>                                         883,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                 778,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,649,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,085,191
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,993,777
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,429,674)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,649,294
<SALES>                                      8,496,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,496,413
<CGS>                                          997,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,588,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,901,305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,084,051
<INCOME-TAX>                                    69,155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,014,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,014,896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 6, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

05-30100

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELLIS MOSES BARBER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

2:03-CR-20093-1

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ellis Moses

Barber has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Barber has

filed a response claiming ineffective assistance of appellate

counsel; and challenging the factual basis supporting his guilty

plea and the district court’s application of the statutorilymandated minimum sentences. 

Our independent review of the brief, the record, and Barber’s

response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. We decline
2

on direct appeal to address Barber’s allegations of ineffective

assistance of counsel. See United States v. Brewster, 137 F.3d

853, 859 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 908 (1998).

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is

excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the appeal

is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.