alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P. 1



# OAR Box 1852 Prepped by Keeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 37 ) ll-C-1 3

Docket Number: 

# A-86-0 3

Printed 11/19/2008 2:38:54

PM Sheet 37 of 101P. 2

-,> v .-•'as* rJfmW. 

# H

«0S P
• * f

. - "KO •rr* SK. C • 

### pS T
*!?•'• • r~„* • *

% -

> < * ..*' • - .*£** • 1 UNlTiB5fME S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTJ^TION A^gf * rf



### JJL2TI9S T 

# 1

/ ; / \

Us . Mart s Tornwal l 5 Greenwa

y Flas a Eas t Suit s 21 0 Houston , T

X77046-058 3 Dea r Ms . Tornwall : Thi s letter answer s th e question s yo

u transmitte

d t o u s concernin

g diese l fue l an

d hydrocarbo

n emission s o

nMa y 27 . A cop y of th e question s i s enclosed . Question s 1 , 3 / an d 5 dea l withth e implication s of raisin g th e 9 0 percent distillatio npoint (T9 0 value ) fo r diese l fue l b

y 10°C , s o w

e wil l answer thos e question s first . Th e weight of evidenc e indicate s that ther e i s littl e direc t relationshi p betwee n particulat e an

d smoke emission s an d th e Ta g value fo

r diese l fuel , al l other factor s bein g th e same . Ther e wer e som

e studie s i

nth e literatur e showin g a differenc e i n eaission s fo

r diese l fuel s withdifferen t To g values , but thi s differenc e i

n emission s ha s sinc e bee nexplaine

d a s bein

g du e to differin

g sulfu

r level s i

nth e tes t fuel s used . Fo r further details , see page s 3-2 9 throug h3-3 3 i

nth e attached repor t 'Diese l Fue l Quality Effect s o

n Emissions , Durability an d Performance. " Industr y source s indicat e that raisin g th e T9 0 value b

y 10° C woul d hav

e littl e o

r n o effec t o

nth e oxidatio

n stability

o f a diese l fuel . Questio n 2 ask s whic

hevaporativ

e HC s are o f mos t concer n environmentally . Evaporativ e HC s ar e predominantl y a mixtur e of butane , propane an d pentane . The

y woul d no t b

e present i

n sufficien t concentration s i n th e immediat e vicinity of a ca

r t o pos e a direc t inhalatio n threa t t o anyon e nearby . However , the y d o contribut e t o ozon e formatio

ni n th e atmosphere .

### P. 3

Th e las t questio

n ask s Unit s o f huma

n acceptanc e o f EP A ha s ambien

t Thes e standard s level s an

d th e report , "Basi s abou t th e maximu

n permissibl e CO , CO2 , NO

xan d hydrocarbon* . air qualit

y standard s fo

r CO , NO

xan d osone . ar e base

d o nhealtheffects . Th e standar

d healt heffect s ar e describe d i n th e attached for Primar

y Ai r Qualit

y criteri a an

d Standards. " hydrocarbons . EP

A ha s n

o exposur e standard s fo r CO 2 an

d

I hop e thet thes e answer s wil l prov e useful . Sincerely ,

Chester j . France , chie f Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc

h Enclosure s

- .
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 158 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10129]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        LANCE CORPORAL ERIC PAUL VALDEPENAS POST OFFICE BUILDING

  The bill (H.R. 6874) to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 156 Taunton Avenue in Seekonk, Massachusetts, 
as the ``Lance Corporal Eric Paul Valdepenas Post Office Building,'' 
was ordered to a third reading, read the third time, and passed.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Harrington West Financial Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the undersigneds best knowledge and belief:  (a)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and(b)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated this 25th day of March 2005. Harrington West Financial Group, Inc./s/ Craig J. CernyCraig J. CernyChief Executive Officer/s/ William W. Phillips, jr.William W. Phillips, Jr.President, Chief Operating Officerand Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. 127
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Michael Ray Howard, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00166

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 47,309

- B ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment
of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment and th e bill of costs by changing the assessment of attorney fees from $850.00 to $425.00. As modified, the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.
We note that the appellant, Michael Ray Howard, has adequately indicated his inability to
pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 27, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0882

SAT Date: 9/17/2013

Print Date: 9/30/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

NEURO

LIVER

KIDNEY

MUTA

ONCO

UNCERT SENS-S

UNCERT DEVEL

AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0882

FATE: Estimations for typical 

 MP < 25 C (E)
log Kow = 4.23 (E) 

S = 19.8 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP = 1.9E-2 torr at 25 C (E)

BP = 256 C (E)

H = 5.88E-4 (E)

log Koc = 3.40 (E)

log Fish BCF = 2.46 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.69 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 50 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate

Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 3 hrs

Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 6 da

Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 19 hr via OH radical

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes, based on physical/chemical 

properties. The PMN substance is a possible alkylating agent. There are concerns for 

neurotoxicity, liver and kidney toxicities, and mutagenicity, based on bromine. There is also 

concern for oncogenicity, as well as uncertain concerns for developmental toxicity and dermal 

sensitization, based on the alkylation potential.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.46

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.93

green algal 96-h EC50 0.17

fish _ chronic value 0.053

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.14

algal _ chronic 

value

0.088

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical 

class = MW 211; with mp unknown (P); log Kow = 4.23 (EPI); S = 20 

mg/L at 20 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean 

measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

5

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

WILLIAM MICKELSON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 570 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 756 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 756

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide adversely affected crop producers with additional time to 
 make fully informed risk management decisions for the 1999 crop year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROP INSURANCE OPTIONS FOR PRODUCERS WHO APPLIED FOR CROP 
              REVENUE COVERAGE PLUS.

    (a) Eligible Producers.--This section applies with respect to a 
producer eligible for insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) who applied for the supplemental crop insurance 
endorsement known as Crop Revenue Coverage PLUS (referred to in this 
section as ``CRCPLUS'') for the 1999 crop year for a spring planted 
agricultural commodity.
    (b) Additional Period for Obtaining or Transferring Coverage.--
Notwithstanding the sales closing date for obtaining crop insurance 
coverage established under section 508(f)(2) of the Federal Crop 
Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1508(f)(2)) and notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation shall provide 
a 14-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, but not 
to extend beyond April 12, 1999, during which a producer described in 
subsection (a) may--
            (1) with respect to a federally reinsured policy, obtain 
        from any approved insurance provider a level of coverage for 
        the agricultural commodity for which the producer applied for 
        the CRCPLUS endorsement that is equivalent to or less than the 
        level of federally reinsured coverage that the producer applied 
        for from the insurance provider that offered the CRCPLUS 
        endorsement; and
            (2) transfer to any approved insurance provider any 
        federally reinsured coverage provided for other agricultural 
        commodities of the producer by the same insurance provider that 
        offered the CRCPLUS endorsement, as determined by the 
        Corporation.

            Passed the Senate March 25, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 756

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide adversely affected crop producers with additional time to 
 make fully informed risk management decisions for the 1999 crop year.
```
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0310[1]

From: Suchecki, Joe [JSuchecki@ngelaw.com]

Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:36 AM

To: Tanya Parise

Subject: RE: Engine Question

Tanya,

I have confirmed with a couple of EMA members that are involved in the home 

generator market that the virtually all home generators are spark-ignited and fueled by 

natural gas. For stationary home generators, there are not likely to be many diesel or 

gasoline powered units. It was suggested that that there may be some diesel 

generators used for farm or home use in remote locations where there is no access to 

natural gas or propane, but they do not think there are significant numbers.

Again, unless in very remote locations, these would also be back-up or emergency 

generators for home use.

We do not have any numbers regarding home generators. However, if you would like 

to get more information, you may contact Nick Halstead with Cummins Power 

Generation, and they may be able to provide some more general information on the 

home generator market.

Nick's email is nick.v.halstead@cummins.com

Joe

Joe Suchecki 

Director, Public Affairs 

Engine Manufacturers Association 

Two North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700

Chicago, IL 60602

Tel: 312-827-8734 

Fax: 312-827-8737 

jsuchecki@emamail.org 

www.enginemanufacturers.org 

Confidentiality Notice: This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information. If you have 

received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete it and any attachments without 

copying or further transmitting the same. 

All attachments are MS Office XP and are MIME encoded. If you have any software compatibility issues, please 

contact EMA at (312) 827-8700 immediately. 

From: Tanya Parise [mailto:parise.tanya@ecrweb.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:15 PM 

To: Suchecki, Joe 

Subject: Engine Question

Hi Joe,

Quick question about engines. I know you’re already working on something for Melanie on the 

crankcase issue, but I wanted to know if EMA has any information on the number of engines or the 

Page 1
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0310[1]

percentage of stationary emergency engines that are residential engines. I’m not sure how this 

information would be tracked or if it’s even possible, but if you have a rough estimate of how many 

emergency diesel engines are in people’s homes, that would be very helpful. 

Thanks,

Tanya

Tanya Parise

EC/R Incorporated

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250

Chapel Hill, NC 27514

(919) 484-0417

Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000926287
<NAME> SANGUINE CORPORATION
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1685
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1685  
<PP&E>                                            1234
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   12919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           465083
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         20877
<OTHER-SE>                                     (473041)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     12919
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                111087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (111087)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (111087)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 32.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lodgian, Inc., (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, W. Thomas Parrington,
the Chief Executive Officer and Manuel Artime, the Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and after
reasonable inquiry:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                                       LODGIAN, INC.



                                       By: /s/  W. THOMAS PARRINGTON
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                 W. THOMAS PARRINGTON
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer



                                       By: /s/  MANUEL ARTIME
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                       MANUEL ARTIME
                                               Executive Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Lodgian, Inc. and will be retained
by Lodgian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 771 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 771

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the memorialization 
at the columbarium at Arlington National Cemetery of veterans who have 
       donated their remains to science, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 13, 1999

   Mr. Robb introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the memorialization 
at the columbarium at Arlington National Cemetery of veterans who have 
       donated their remains to science, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEMORIALIZATION AT COLUMBARIUM AT ARLINGTON NATIONAL 
              CEMETERY OF VETERANS WHO HAVE DONATED THEIR REMAINS TO 
              SCIENCE.

    (a) Authority To Memorialize.--(1) Chapter 24 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 2412. Arlington National Cemetery: memorialization at 
              columbarium of veterans who have donated their remains to 
              science
    ``The Secretary of the Army may honor, by marker or other 
appropriate means at the columbarium at Arlington National Cemetery, 
the memory of any veteran eligible for inurnment in the columbarium 
whose cremated remains cannot be inurned in the columbarium as a result 
of the donation of the veteran's organs or remains for medical or 
scientific purposes.''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of that chapter is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``2412. Arlington National Cemetery: memorialization at columbarium of 
                            veterans who have donated their remains to 
                            science.''.
    (b) Applicability.--Section 2412 of title 38, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall apply to veterans who die on or after 
January 1, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
*January 16, 1945.*

#### Becker, Executrix, Appellant, vs. Trachte, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Olin R. Moyle*of Johnson Creek.

For the respondent: *Grady & Dakin*of Watertown.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.

Motion for rehearing denied, without costs, on January 16, 1945.
Exhibit 99.17  CONSENT OF DOMINIQUE GIRARD  I consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March     , 2017 (the Annual Report) of my name and the information that I have approved of as a qualified person under the Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 in the Annual Information Form of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited dated March     , 2017 (the AIF) filed as part of the Annual Report.  I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-10 (registration no. 333-206498), Form F-3D (registration no. 333-215096) and Form S-8 (registration nos. 333-130339 and 333-152004) of the reference to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.  March 27, 2017  /s/Dominique GirardDominique GirardVice-President   Technical Services and Nunavut Operations
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700174

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

SAMUEL LUA

Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Matthew J. Kent, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Marine Corps 

Communication-Electronics School, Training Command, Twentynine 

Palms, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel Michael 

E. Sayegh, USMC.

For Appellant: Commander R. Don Evans, Jr., JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 31 August 2017

_________________________

Before GLASER-ALLEN, MARKS, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Order entered May 12 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00891 - CV FIRST BANK & TRUST C OMPANY, ET AL., Appellant V. CENTURA LAND CORPORA TION F/K/A IORI CENT URA, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial D istrict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 12 - 04743 

### O RDER Asserting, in part, that the parties are attempting to settle their differences, appellants have filed a second unopposed motion to extend time to file their reply brief. We GRANT the M a y 5, 2015 motion and ORDER appellants to file either their reply brief or a motion to dismiss the appeal no later than July 14, 2015

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Network Plus Corp. on Form S-3 and Form S-8 of our report dated
February 28, 2000, except for the information presented in Note 24, for which
the date is March 8, 2000, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and the financial statement schedule of Network Plus Corp., as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1999, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2000