alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONTACT REPORT

Person Calling: Keith Barnett

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency OAQPS/ESD/OCG 919

- 541

- 5605 Person Called: Chet Thompson, representing CEMEX
Date of Contact: April 23, 2009 Contact Summary : Chet called to express a concern about the Portland Cement NSPS. If you trigger NSR you have to do a BACT analysis which would mean that the NSPS is the minimum allowed. This would be 1.5 lb/ton. The CEMEX Brooksville kiln has riser firing (20 to 40 percent of the fuel ). Riser burners improve heat transfer in the preheater. A true precalciner will have a tertiary air duct from the clinker cooler.
**EXHIBIT 21**

**ALEXANDER’S, INC.**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

 

731 Commercial Holding LLC

731 Commercial LLC

731 Office One Holding LLC

731 Office One LLC

731 Office Two Holding LLC

731 Office Two LLC

731 Residential Holding LLC

731 Residential LLC

731 Restaurant LLC

731 Retail One LLC

Alexander’s Department Stores of Brooklyn, Inc.

Alexander’s Department Stores of New Jersey, Inc.

Alexander’s Kings Plaza, LLC

Alexander’s of Kings, LLC

Alexander’s Management LLC

Alexander’s of Brooklyn II LLC

Alexander’s of Brooklyn, Inc.

Alexander’s of Flushing, Inc.

Alexander’s of Rego Park II, Inc.

Alexander’s of Rego Park III, Inc.

ALX of Paramus, LLC

Alexander’s Personnel Providers, Inc.

Alexander’s Rego Park Center, Inc.

Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc.

Alexander’s Restaurant LLC

Kings Parking, LLC

Kings Plaza Lender LLC

Ownreal Inc.

Rego Park Commercial LLC

Rego Park Residential LLC

Sakraf Wine & Liquor Store, Inc.

----
#### Rhead, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *William Greenhouse*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *John E. Martin,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1249

LT Case No. 2022-CT-001775-A

_____________________________

DARRIN SHANE JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Seminole County.

Wayne Culver, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Jane Almy, Assistant 

Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. 

Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

December 5, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, EISNAUGLE, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 618

To provide for the declassification of the journal kept by Glenn T. Seaborg

while serving as Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15, 1999

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To provide for the declassification of the journal kept by

Glenn T. Seaborg while serving as Chairman of the

Atomic Energy Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 (1) Dr. Glenn T. Seaborg was a truly great American

5 who made indispensable contributions in the development

6 of nuclear energy.

7 (2) Dr. Seaborg was the co-discoverer of plutonium

8 and eight other elements and as a result of these discov9 eries was awarded the 1951 Nobel Prize for chemistry.
2

S 618 IS

1 (3) While serving as Chairman of the Atomic Energy

2 Commission (AEC), Dr. Seaborg maintained a journal

3 consisting of a diary, correspondence, announcements,

4 minutes of meetings, and other documents of historical

5 value.

6 (4) In preparing the journal, Dr. Seaborg took care

7 to include only information which was not classified and

8 could be made public.

9 (5) Before leaving the Atomic Energy Commission,

10 Dr. Seaborg submitted the journal to the AEC’s Division

11 of Classification for review.

12 (6) Dr. Seaborg’s journal was cleared by the Division

13 of Classification, virtually without deletion.

14 (7) Twelve years later, in 1983, the chief historian

15 at the Department of Energy asked to borrow a copy of

16 Dr. Seaborg’s journal in order to write a history of the

17 AEC.

18 (8) When the journal was returned to Dr. Seaborg

19 three years later, passage after passage was redacted, in20 cluding explicitly public information, such as the published

21 code names of nuclear weapons tests, and purely personal

22 material, such as his description of accompanying his chil23 dren on a ‘‘trick or treat’’ outing one Halloween evening.
3

S 618 IS

1 SEC. 2. DECLASSIFICATION OF SEABORG JOURNAL.

2 The Secretary of Energy shall surrender Dr. Glenn

3 T. Seaborg’s journal, which he prepared while serving as

4 Chairman of the AEC, to Dr. Seaborg’s estate. The jour5 nal shall be returned in the original, unredacted form in

6 which it was lent to the Department of Energy in 1983.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.18

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                         BANCORPSOUTH CAPITAL TRUST III

         THIS Certificate of Trust of BancorpSouth Capital Trust III (the
"Trust"), dated as of October 31, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss. 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

         1.       Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is
BancorpSouth Capital Trust III.

         2.       Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust in the State of Delaware are The Bank of New York (Delaware), White
Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.

         3.       Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
upon filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust,
have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)
of the Act.

                                    THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE), not in its
                                    individual capacity but solely as trustee
                                    of the Trust



                                    By:    /s/ William T. Lewis
                                           ------------------------------------
                                    Name:
                                           ------------------------------------
                                    Title: WILLIAM T. LEWIS, SVP
                                           ------------------------------------

                                    THE BANK OF NEW YORK, not in its individual
                                    capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust



                                    By:    /s/ Robert A. Massimillo
                                           ------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Robert A. Massimillo
                                           ------------------------------------
                                    Title: VICE PRESIDENT
                                           ------------------------------------



                                    /s/ Aubrey B. Patterson
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    AUBREY B. PATTERSON, not in his
                                    individual capacity but solely as trustee of
                                    the Trust



                                    /s/ L. Nash Allen, Jr.
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    L. NASH ALLEN, JR., not in his individual
                                    capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure; Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure will hold a meeting in a hybrid format with remote attendance options on January 7, 2025 in San Diego, CA. The meeting is open to the public for observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at:                         *https://www.uscourts.gov/​rules-policies/​records-and-archives-rules-committees/​agenda-books.*

# DATES:

January 7, 2025.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        H. Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

Dated: October 23, 2024.

Shelly L. Cox,

Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2024-25005 Filed 10-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
#### W. L. Ayres, Appellant, v. P. O. Kalstrom, Appellee.

Railroad Grants: when title vests.

*Appeal fromO’Brien District Cowrt.*— Hon. Soott M. Ladd, Judge.

Wednesday, December 16, 1891.

Action to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the defendant in wrongfully entering upon and cultivating certain land which is claimed by the plaintiff. When the evidence had been fully submitted, the court instructed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. A verdict was returned, and a judgment rendered in harmony with the instruction. The plaintiff *appeals.*

Affirmed.

*S. A. Calvert,*for appellant.

*Hughes ‡ Hastings,*for appellee.

Robinson, J.

The controlling questions presented for our consideration in this ease are the same as those determined in *Bowne v. Bilsland,*83 Iowa, 162. Following the rule of that ease, the judgment of the district court must be affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Boston RestaurantAssociates, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)                                  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended  October 23, 2005(the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 23, 2005 | /s/ Fran Ross            |   |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                               | Fran Ross                |
|                               | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Form  10-QSB for the six months  ended  March 31,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such  FInancial  Statements and Notes,
thereto.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,309,278
<SECURITIES>                                   2,032,832
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,005,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                      96,900
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,480,856
<PP&E>                                           966,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                   154,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                10,430,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,405,607
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,641,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  10,430,764
<SALES>                                       11,752,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              11,752,281
<CGS>                                          8,944,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 11,048,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                22,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  763,264
<INCOME-TAX>                                     166,212
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              703,701
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     597,052
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .11
        

</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00089

- CV

In the Interest of D.W.W., a Child
On Appeal from the 135th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 22

- 03

- 88446

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. No c osts are assessed due to appellant ’ s inability to pay costs.
We further order this decision certifi ed below for ob servance. June 22, 2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7070

CRAIG JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-01-551-3)

Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 17, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* This case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising

jurisdiction upon consent of the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)

(2000).

2

PER CURIAM:

Craig Johnson seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and

conclude that Johnson has not made a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.* Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1602

STEVEN D. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION; SMURFIT-STONE

CONTAINER CORPORATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-00-3714)

Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mitchell Jerry Williams, HARRIS & GRAVES, P.A., Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellant. Curtis L. Ott, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM &

LANEY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting

Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this tort action. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v.

Stone Container Corp., No. CA-00-3714 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 28, 2016

No. 04-16-00458-CR

IN RE Robert Joseph SMITH II

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On July 21, 2016, relator Robert Joseph Smith II filed a petition for writ of mandamus

complaining the trial court had not ruled upon motions he filed in April, 2016. This court requested 

a response from the real party in interest and respondent. On August 10, 2016, the State of Texas 

filed a response. We have reviewed the petition and the response and have determined that Relator 

is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is 

CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(c). 

The Honorable N. Keith Williams is ORDERED to rule upon the “Motion for Nunc Pro 

Tunc Order to Correct Jail Time Credit” and “Motion for Nunc Pro Tunc Order Deleting Court 

Appointed Attorney Fees” within fourteen days from the date of this order. The writ will issue 

only if we are notified that Judge Williams has failed to act as directed within fourteen days from 

the date of this order. 

It is so ORDERED on September 28, 2016.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of September, 2016.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. A13660, styled State of Texas v. Robert Joseph Smith, II, pending in the 

216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable N. Keith Williams presiding.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Fran Ross, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Qof Boston Restaurant Associates, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations,  and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)         [omitted]

 

(c)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report; and

 

(d)         Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  August 29, 2005 | /s/ Fran Ross                             |   |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             |   Fran Ross, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----