alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15(e)
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE
 ProLogis California I LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company Skechers USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation
 RECITALS
     Period
    
    Monthly Base RentJanuary 1, 2011  August 31, 2011
    
    $
    40,895.68
      TENANT:
    
    
    
    LANDLORD:Skechers USA, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation
    
    
    
    ProLogis California I LLC, a Delaware limited
liability companyBy:
    
    ProLogis Management Incorporated
a Delaware corporation
 its AgentBy:
    
    /s/ Paul K. Galliher
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ W. Scott LamsonName:
    
    Paul K. Galliher
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    W. Scott LamsonTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    Senior Vice President
Morgantown Municipal Airport 

100 Hart Field Road 

Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 

(304) 291-7461 

IMORGANTOWN www.morqantownairport.com 

MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 

Calvin G. Kelly III 

Airport Director 

c.glcn.kellv(a> wvdsl.net 

May 6, 2010 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

I fully support Colgan Air Inc. dba United Express to continue commercial air service 

at Morgantown MurricipahAirporttMGW) with fligfrts to Dulles International Airport 

(IAD). Please recommend to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International 

Affairs that Colgan Air Inc. be selected as the air carrier for this airport. 

Colgan's service has been-outstand+ng and I-believe Mr. FMiil Reed is the onJy one 

I've seen who will be able to make aviation viable in the future of this airport without 

being underwritten. 

Respectfully, 

Calvin G. 

Director 

Morgantown Municipal Airport
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Thomas C. Drees, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:8/2/07By:/s/Thomas C. DreesThomas C. Drees, Ph.D    CEO, President and Chairman of the Board of Director
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, our financial condition and result of  operations. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |                                           |                   |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|                           | WORLDS.COM INC.(Registrant)                    |
|                           |                                           |                   |
| Date: April      14, 2010 | By:                                  | /s/ Thomas Kidrin |
|                           | Thomas      KidrinChief      Executive Officer |
#### Egery (Harry), Respondent, vs. Smith and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Nolan, Dougherty, Grubb & Ryan*of Janesville.

For the respondent: *Adams & Adams*of Beloit.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 785 Reference Change Senate (RCS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 785

                For the relief of Frances Schochenmaier.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 13, 1999

  Mr. Johnson (for himself and Mr. Daschle) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

                              May 12, 1999

    Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Frances Schochenmaier.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF OF FRANCES SCHOCHENMAIER.

    (a) Relief.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 
moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Frances 
Schochenmaier of Bonesteel, South Dakota, the sum of $60,567.58 in 
compensation for the erroneous underpayment to Herman Schochenmaier, 
husband of Frances Schochenmaier, during the period from September 1945 
to March 1995, of compensation and other benefits relating to a 
service-connected disability incurred by Herman Schochenmaier during 
military service in World War II.
    (b) Limitation on Fees.--(1) Not more than a total of 10 percent of 
the payment required by subsection (a) may be paid to or received by 
agents or attorneys for services rendered in connection with obtaining 
such payment, any contract to the contrary notwithstanding.
    (2) Any person who violates this subsection shall be fined not more 
than $1,000.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51504 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAMON DARIO-URBINA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-809-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ramon DarioUrbina raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31(e)2**

**MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Frances V. Turnage, certify that:

1.

 I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mississippi Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 26, 2007

/s/Frances V. Turnage

Frances V. Turnage

Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(dollars in thousands)
 Fiscal Year Ended September 302005
    
    2004
    
    2003
    
    2002
    
    2001EarningsIncome from continuing operations
    
    
    73,195
    
    
    
    88,309
    
    
    
    127,406
    
    
    
    155,508
    
    
    
    29,475Add:Provision for income taxes
    
    
    31,755
    
    
    
    30,308
    
    
    
    77,544
    
    
    
    91,776
    
    
    
    65,336Fixed charges
    
    
    106,369
    
    
    
    171,877
    
    
    
    232,028
    
    
    
    249,974
    
    
    
    288,083Earnings, as adjusted (A)
    
    
    211,319
    
    
    
    290,494
    
    
    
    436,978
    
    
    
    497,258
    
    
    
    382,894Fixed chargesOther interest expense including interest on capital leases
    
    
    78,689
    
    
    
    140,733
    
    
    
    198,617
    
    
    
    213,077
    
    
    
    247,592Estimated interest component of rental expense
    
    
    27,680
    
    
    
    31,145
    
    
    
    33,411
    
    
    
    36,897
    
    
    
    40,491Total fixed charges (B)
    
    
    106,369
    
    
    
    171,878
    
    
    
    232,028
    
    
    
    249,974
    
    
    
    288,083Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (A) divided by (B)
    
    
    2.0
    
    
    
    1.7
    
    
    
    1.9
    
    
    
    2.0
    
    
    
    1.3
#### STATE *v.*JOHN YORK, BARNEY SIGMON and others.

It is not necessary to constitute a riot, that the facts charged should amount to a distinct and substantive'indictable offense; it is sufficient, if such facts shall constitute an attempt to commit an act of violence which, if completed, would be an indictable offence.-

(Oases of *State*v. *Fitzgerald,,*1 Dev. c% Bat.- 408; *State*v, *Emthcochf*7 Ired. 52, cited and approved.)

INDICTMENT for a Riot, tried before Henry, e/1, at the Spring Term, 1873, of the Superior Court of Bueke County.

The indictment charged John b ork, Barney Sigmon and others, naming them, *“*unlawful!)7, violently, riotously and tumultuously assembled and gathered together to disturb the _peace,” &c., *“*and being so then and there assembled together, did then and there make great noises, riot, tumult and disturbance, and then and there unlawfully, violently, routously, and tumultously remained and continued together making such noise,” .&e., “for the space of a half hour or more, and being .so assembled together for the purpose aforesaid, with sticks and stones, did follow and pursue one David Tallent for the purpose of assaulting and beating him, the said David Tallent,” &c., to his great terror, &c.

Upon this indictment the defendants were found guilty, when their counsel moved an arrest of judgment, for the reason that the indictment is defective and insufficient. Motion overruled, .whereupon the defendants appealed.

No counsel in this Court for .defendants.

*Attorney General*Hargrove, for the State.

Bynum, J.

The defendants, with others, are indicted for a riot. If the indictment had stopped short of the charge, that being so riotously assembled, the defendants “ with sticks and : stones did follow and pursue one David Tallent, for the purpose of assaulting and beating .him, to the terror of said Tal-*67lent and the good citizens of the State, then and there being •and residing,” it would have been insufficient. Every indictment is a compound of law and fact, and it is essential that ‘ the special manner of the whole fact must be set forth with such certainty that it may judicially appear to the Court that the indietors have not gone on insufficient premises.” *State*v. *Fitzgerald,*1 D. and B. 408; *State*v. *Haithcock,*7 Ired. 52.

But when the indictment charges the armed pursuit of Tal-lent by a multitude, with the purpose and intent to assault and beat him, to his terror, it does charge facts, which the Court can see upon inspection, constitute the crime alleged. Eor it is not necessary to constitute a riot, that the facts charged should amount to a distinct and substantative indictable offence. It is sufficient to complete this offence, that the facts charged shall constitute an attempt to commit an act of violence, which, 'if completed, would be an indictable offence. So, it is immaterial in our case, whether the facts set forth constitute an assault or. an attempt to assault David Tallent, for the multitude, the unlawful purpose, the arms and the attempt to assault, constitute the crime, as a conclusion of law.

There is no error.

Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY
                              FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                              FROM   CONDENSED   CONSOLIDATED
                              BALANCE    SHEETS,    CONDENSED
                              CONSOLIDATED    STATEMENTS   OF
                              OPERATIONS    AND    NOTES   TO
                              CONDENSED          CONSOLIDATED
                              FINANCIAL   STATEMENTS  AND  IS
                              QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
                              REFERENCE  TO  SUCH   FINANCIAL
                              STATEMENTS.                    
                              
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000925054     
<NAME>                        Spectrian Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          6,207
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                      361
<INVENTORY>                                    14,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               32,635
<PP&E>                                         37,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 54,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,908
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       52,866
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,560)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   54,214
<SALES>                                        56,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               56,680
<CGS>                                          42,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,510)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,512)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)
        


</TABLE>
STATE OF 

RTH 

PROCLAMATION 

WORKER'S MEMORIAL DAY 

APRIL 28, 2023 

W H ERE AS, workers in every industry across the United States of America and throughout North Dakota 

serve as the backbone of our economy through their hard work, creativity and resiliency, and all workers 

hove o right to safety fn the workplace; and 

W H ERE AS, tragically, thousands of workers are killed and millions more are hurt or foll ill every year in 

the workplace - incidents that are often preventable; and 

W H ERE AS, on April 28, 1971, the Occupational Health and Safety Act took effect, creoting the 

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) as well as the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health, an independent research institute in the then-Deportment of Health, Education and 

Welfare and now under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and 

W H ERE AS, OSHA works to ensure safe and healthful working conditions for workers by setting and 

enforcing standards and requirements for workplace safety and health, as well as providing training, 

education, outreach and assistance to employers and employees; and 

WHEREAS, April 28 is observed annually as Worker's Memorial Doy as a day to remember people who 

passed away on the job or were injured while working; and 

W H ERE AS, North Dokotons ore renewing efforts to build better understanding and training to create 

safer workplaces and rededicating themselves to help American workplaces maintain o safe environment 

for teammates. 

NOW, THEREFORE, as Governor of the State of North Dakota, I do hereby proclaim 

April 28, 2023, WORKER'S MEMORIAL DAY in the State of North Dakota. 

Doug BU'lJI\Jm 

GOVERNOR 

,1Esr~~~ 

Michael Howe 

SECRETARYOFSTATE 

•
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 165 (Tuesday, October 14, 2008)]
[House]
[Page S10515]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 154

WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2008

No. 165
```
##### 



Exhibit 11
 A.S.V., Inc. and Subsidiary
Computation of Earnings per Share
(In thousands, except share data)
 Three Months Ended
    
    
    Six Months EndedSeptember 30,
    
    
    September 30,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005BasicEarningsNet earnings
    
    $
    5,078
    
    
    $
    8,001
    
    
    $
    19,615
    
    
    $
    19,728SharesWeighted average number of common
shares outstanding
    
    
    26,669,269
    
    
    
    26,849,654
    
    
    
    26,918,270
    
    
    
    26,787,977Basic earnings per common share
    
    $
    .19
    
    
    $
    .30
    
    
    $
    .73
    
    
    $
    .74DilutedEarningsNet earnings
    
    $
    5,078
    
    
    $
    8,001
    
    
    $
    19,615
    
    
    $
    19,728SharesWeighted average number of common
shares outstanding
    
    
    26,669,269
    
    
    
    26,849,654
    
    
    
    26,918,270
    
    
    
    26,787,977Assuming exercise of options reduced by
the number of shares which could have
been purchased with the proceeds from
the exercise of such options
    
    
    202,402
    
    
    
    950,645
    
    
    
    506,035
    
    
    
    896,177Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding
    
    
    26,871,671
    
    
    
    27,800,299
    
    
    
    27,424,305
    
    
    
    27,684,154Diluted earnings per common share
    
    $
    .19
    
    
    $
    .29
    
    
    $
    .72
    
    
    $
    .71