alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of Capital Environmental Resource Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ronald L. Rubin, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

    (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

<Table>
<S>    <C>                                               <C>
/s/ RONALD L. RUBIN
-------------------------------
Name:  Ronald L. Rubin
Title: Chief Financial Officer
</Table>

November 28, 2003

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 788 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 788

  To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to provide that a quality 
grade label issued by the Secretary of Agriculture may not be used for 
                 imported meat and meat food products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 13, 1999

    Mr. Burns (for himself, Mr. Enzi, and Mr. Craig) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to provide that a quality 
grade label issued by the Secretary of Agriculture may not be used for 
                 imported meat and meat food products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``USDA Grade Recission Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. QUALITY GRADE LABELING OF IMPORTED MEAT AND MEAT FOOD PRODUCTS.

    Section 1(n) of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601(n)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (11), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (12), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) if it is an imported carcass, part thereof, meat, or 
        meat food product (including any carcass, part thereof, meat, 
        or meat food product produced from any cattle, sheep, or goats 
        that have not been fed in the United States for at least 90 
        days) and bears a label that indicates a quality grade issued 
        by the Secretary.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
99(b)



Chief Financial Officer
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



---



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Richard H. Flake, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    RICHARD H.
FLAKERichard H. Flake Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Date: May 2, 2003



A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange commission or its staff upon request.
#### Stollfuss, by Guardian *ad litem,*Appellant, vs. Reeck, Respondent.

*December 7,1950*—

January *9, 1951.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Lloyd D. Mitchell*of Oshkosh, and for the respondent on the brief of *Robert C. Born*of Ripon.

Brown, J.

Suit for damages to person and property was begun September 6, 1949. The defendant counterclaimed for property damage. Judgment for defendant on both complaint and counterclaim was entered May 27, 1950. The action arose out of a collision between plaintiff’s motorcycle and defendant’s automobile. For reasons which will appear, no detailed statement of facts is necessary.

It is conceded that after the jury had been charged and had retired for deliberation it returned to the courtroom with a request for further instructions, and instructions were given. The transcript of proceedings contains no report of this whatever and the reporter certifies that the transcript “is a true and accurate transcript of my shorthand notes, and the whole thereof.” It is established, therefore, that whatever *279passed between the court, counsel, and jury on this occasion was not taken down by the reporter.

Sec. 270.21, Stats., provides:

> *“Charge to jury; how given.*The judge shall charge the jury and all such and subsequent instructions shall, unless a written charge be waived by counsel at the commencement of the trial be reduced to writing before being delivered or the same shall be taken down by the official reporter of the court. Each instruction asked by counsel to be given the jury shall be given without change or refused in full. If any judge shall violate any of the foregoing provisions or make any comments to the jury upon the law or facts without the same being so reduced to writing or taken down, the verdict shall be set aside or the judgment rendered thereon reversed unless at the time of submission to the jury there was no jury issue upon the evidence. The reporter shall take down all that the judge says during the trial to the jury or in their presence of or concerning such cause. . . .”

Ch. 179, Laws of 1915, sec. 2485, imposes on the municipal court of Ripon the general provisions of the statutes applicable to circuit courts. There can be no doubt that the direction of sec. 270.21, Stats., was not followed, that the judge commented to the jury upon the law or facts without his comments being taken down or reduced to writing and, if the comments amounted to a charge, that there was no waiver of a written charge at the beginning of the trial. The violation contemplated by the statute has occurred.

Respondent submits that the colloquy between court, counsel, and jury was actually, immaterial and no prejudice resulted, but the statute does not permit us to reconstruct the proceeding from other sources than the reporter’s notes transcribed and rest our decision upon such reconstruction. The. command of the legislature that the judgment be reversed is explicit.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to grant a new trial.
Essential Air Service At Fort Dodge IA

January 27, 2014 -I !t\ P." 7 Q. /", ':::,: 

### tt

## ~!
•. "I" .•

, ,_ u r It hascome to the attention ofTransportAzumah that several EASmarkets will be experiencing an interruption in service beginning at the end of this week. The inventory for Fort Dodge IAiszeroed out in the Great Lakesreservations system after Friday, January 31, 2014. Service interruptions in EAS communities tend to destroy the passenger baseof the markets involved. This leads to numerous bid periods inwhich the community exceeds $200 per passenger in subsidy and puts them under constant risk of being eliminated from the program.
In order to maintain the passenger base atthese communities, TransportAzumah proposes the implementation of emergency interim busservice. These emergency contracts would be issued under the Department's discretionary authority for an interim period of three months while markets without a new carrier are bid. TransportAzumah hasthe ability to implement these services beginning February 1, 2014 using midsized and full sized long distance coaches. During the interim period, there would be no fare charged on these services.
The following markets would receive emergency interim busservice beginning February 1: TransportAzumah Emergency Interim BusService Market Hub Round TripsPerDay 3Month Subsidy Fort Dodge IA MSP 3 $446,424 TransportAzumah recognizes that this program may require the communities to opt into the alternate EASprogram for ashort period oftime. Aswith past agreements, communities should be aware that opting into the alternate EASprogram is not permanent. Inthis situation, the Department could allow communities to opt into the alternate EASprogram only during the period of air service hiatus. We believe that three months issufficient for motivated air carriers to submit abid to restore air service to these communities. Sample busschedules are provided below. They are subject to change: 

### Fort Dodge IA- MSP Fort Dodge IA> MSP (Daily) Fort Dodge IA 445a 745a 145p MSP 830a 1130a 530p MSP> Fort Dodge IA(Daily) MSP 1230p 400p 730p Fort Dodge IA 415p 745p 1115p

In light of the short timeframe available to avoid uninterrupted service, we request expedited consideration of our request. Dueto the length of this contract, we will also need modified payment arrangements. Please contact usassoon aspossible sothat we can start on orjust after February 1, 2014.

Contact: JoelAnabilah-Azumah, jazumah@transportazumah.com. 347-927-0750
---

Exhibit 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Forum National Investments
  Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2005
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: December 22, 2006 | By                                                          | /s/
      *Martin Tutschek*
|------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------
|                         | Martin Tutschek, Chief Financial Officer
      and Director



---
**Exhibit 31.3****CERTIFICATION**I, Lynn R. Blodgett, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affiliated ComputerServices, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. *{Intentionally omitted};*4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  October 19, 2007 /s/ Lynn R. Blodgett   Lynn R. Blodgett, President and   Chief Executive Officer ofAffiliated Computer Services, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2013

t0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2013

147290

CAMILLE F. McMILLAN,

Plaintif f

- Appellant,

v SC: 147290

COA: 311638

MCAC: 09

- 000110

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 159 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Pages D1221-D1222]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            NEW PUBLIC LAWS

     (For last listing of Public Laws, see Daily Digest, p. D1191)
  H.R. 1777, to amend the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 to 
make permanent the favorable treatment of need-based educational aid 
under the antitrust laws. Signed on September 30, 2008. (Public Law 
110-327)
  H.R. 2608, to amend section 402 of the Personal Responsibility and 
Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 to provide, in fiscal years 
2009 through 2011, extensions of supplemental security income for 
refugees, asylees, and certain other humanitarian immigrants, and to 
amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to collect unemployment 
compensation debts resulting from fraud. Signed on September 30, 2008. 
(Public Law 110-328)
  H.R. 2638, making appropriations for the Department of Homeland 
Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008. Signed on 
September 30, 2008. (Public Law 110-329)
  H.R. 6984, to amend title 49, United States Code, to extend 
authorizations for the airport improvement program, to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the funding and expenditure 
authority of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. Signed on September 30, 
2008. (Public Law 110-330)
  S. 171, to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the ``Mickey 
Mantle Post Office Building''. Signed on September 30, 2008. (Public 
Law 110-331)
  S. 2339, to designate the Department of Veterans Affairs clinic in 
Alpena, Michigan, as the ``Lieutenant Colonel Clement C. Van Wagoner 
Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''. Signed on September 30, 2008. 
(Public Law 110-332)
  S. 3241, to designate the facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 1717 Orange Avenue in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the 
``CeeCee Ross Lyles Post Office Building''. Signed on September 30, 
2008. (Public Law 110-333)

[[Page D1222]]

  S. 3009, to designate the Federal Bureau of Investigation building 
under construction in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ``J. James Exon Federal 
Bureau of Investigation Building''. Signed on October 1, 2008. (Public 
Law 110-334)
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 159 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10320]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED

  As in executive session the Presiding Officer laid before the Senate 
messages from the President of the United States submitting sundry 
nominations which were referred to the appropriate committees.
  (The nominations received today are printed at the end of the Senate 
proceedings.)

                          ____________________
```
December 1, 2015 

Dear Mr. Nguyen: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−4108). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual(s). 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/15/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Program Analyst
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          96,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,666
<INVENTORY>                                     46,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,144
<PP&E>                                       1,154,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                 345,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,051,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          131,723
<BONDS>                                        344,142
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           284
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,051,856
<SALES>                                        293,843
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               348,055
<CGS>                                          240,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,090
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,757
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,757
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .98
        

</TABLE>