alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 851

To allow Federal employees to take advantage of the transportation fringe

benefit provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that are available to

private sector employees.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 21, 1999

Mr. CHAFEE (for himself and Mr. MOYNIHAN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To allow Federal employees to take advantage of the transportation fringe benefit provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that are available to private sector employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CASH PAYMENT TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FOR

4 PARKING SPACES.

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the

6 ‘‘Federal Employee Flexibility Act of 1999’’.

7 (b) IN GENERAL.—Section 7905 of title 5, United

8 States Code, is amended—

9 (1) in subsection (a)—
2

•S 851 IS

1 (A) in paragraph (2)(C) by inserting

2 ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon;

3 (B) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘; and’’

4 and inserting a period; and

5 (C) by striking paragraph (4); and

6 (2) in subsection (b)(2)—

7 (A) by amending subparagraph (A) to read

8 as follows:

9 ‘‘(A) a qualified transportation fringe as

10 defined in section 132(f)(1) of the Internal Rev11 enue Code of 1986;’’;

12 (B) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘and’’

13 after the semicolon;

14 (C) in subparagraph (C) by striking the

15 period and inserting a semicolon and ‘‘and’’;

16 and

17 (D) by adding at the end the following:

18 ‘‘(D) taxable cash payment to an employee

19 in lieu of an agency-provided parking space.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 88067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25735]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Technology, Innovation and Partnerships; 
Cancellation of Meeting

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice; cancellation of meeting date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The National Science Foundation published a notice in the Federal 
Register October 21, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-24376 at 89 FR 84205-84206, 
concerning a meeting of the Advisory Committee for Technology, 
Innovation and Partnerships. The meeting scheduled for Friday, November 
15, 2024, at 12 p.m. (ET) is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Crystal Robinson, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aac9d8d8c5c8c3c4d9eac4d9cc84cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d3e2f2f323f34332e1d332e3b733a322b">[email protected]</span></a> or 703-292-8687.

    Dated: October 31, 2024.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2024-25735 Filed 11-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### WILSON & SHOBER v. HUTCHINSON and others.

Where, upon an appeal to this court, the appellant fails to prepare a case and serve it upon the adverse party, as required by the provisions of the ( ode of Civil Procedure, “f/it *liberal practice among the members of the bar in this*district, ” in such cases, is not sufficient ground to warrant a writ of *certiorari.*

PetitioN by defendants for a certiorari, filed at this term.

The plaintiffs brought an action against the defendants on a promissory note and obtained judgment thereupon at Fall *433Term, 1875, of G-uilrord Superior Court. From that judgment the defendants appealed and duly filed an appeal bond. More than ten days after the notice of appeal the defendants” counsel served upon the counsel for the plaintiffs a statement of the case upon appeal. The counsel for the plaintiffs declined to accept the same or to take any notice thereof.

The other facts necessary to an understanding of the case as decided, are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

*Scott <& Caldwell,*for petitioners.

*Dillard c& Gilm.er,*and *Cray c% Stamps,*contra.

Eis ARSON, C. J.

The writ of *certiorari*in the place of an-appeal, is prayed for on the ground that the petitioners ought not to be prejudiced by the delay of their counsel in making up the statement of a case for the Supreme Court. This delay is attributed in the petition to the “ liberal practice among the members of the bar in that district,” &c.

"With all of this we have nothing to do. The C. C. P. specifies tiie time in which the appellant must have a case made up. For a failure to do so, the attorney is liable for damages. This seems to be a fit case in which that right of a client against his lawyef can be enforced, and perhaps an example may serve a good purpose, and hereafter lawyers will not depend upon an indefinite, general understanding “ among counsel,” but will make up the case in the time required by law, unless there be a specific arrangement in regard to it.

Per CuRrAM. Motion refused..
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 175 (Monday, November 17, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10535]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 Senate

Monday, November 17, 2008

(Legislative day of Wednesday, September 17, 2008)

  The Senate met at 12 noon and was called to order by the Honorable 
Jon Tester, a Senator from the State of Montana.
                                 ______
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
 K-Tron International, Inc.
List of Subsidiaries
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    State or Jurisdiction
of IncorporationK-Tron Investment Co.
    
    DelawareGundlach Equipment Corporation
    
    DelawareK-Tron America, Inc.
    
    DelawareK-Tron Colormax Limited
    
    United KingdomK-Tron Pneumatic Conveying Systems Limited
    
    United KingdomK-Tron (Schweiz) AG
    
    SwitzerlandK-Tron Asia Pte Ltd
    
    SingaporeK-Tron China Limited
    
    Hong KongK-Tron Deutschland GmbH
    
    GermanyK-Tron France S.a.r.l.
    
    FranceK-Tron Great Britain Limited
    
    United KingdomWuxi K-Tron Colormax Machinery Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaPennsylvania Crusher Corporation
    
    DelawareJeffrey Specialty Equipment Corporation
    
    DelawarePremier Pneumatics, Inc.
    
    DelawareK-Tron Technologies, Inc.
    
    Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
       
<S>                                <C>                 <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                    JUL-01-1997          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1997          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS                  9-MOS
<CASH>                            117,944              117,944
<SECURITIES>                            0                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                      16,377               16,377
<ALLOWANCES>                          931                  931
<INVENTORY>                             0                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  134,000              134,000
<PP&E>                             15,332               15,332
<DEPRECIATION>                      2,728                2,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    179,157              179,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              29,249               29,249
<BONDS>                           166,598              166,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              41,049               41,049
<PREFERRED>                             0                    0
<COMMON>                           74,014               74,014
<OTHER-SE>                       (132,441)            (132,441)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      179,157              179,157
<SALES>                            15,277               26,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   15,277               26,998
<CGS>                              13,463               23,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      13,463               23,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   27,621               69,969
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    2,225                2,657
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  4,444                8,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (29,375)             (73,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (29,375)             (73,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0                    0
<CHANGES>                               0                    0
<NET-INCOME>                      (29,375)             (73,637)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (4.15)              (10.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (1.71)               (5.14)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          80,556
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,192
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                29,195
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   653
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    324,852
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          33,102
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            33,182
<LOANS>                                      1,374,721
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,982,595
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,533,392
<SHORT-TERM>                                    18,389
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             45,882
<LONG-TERM>                                    123,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,187
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,982,595
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 29,458
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,834
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  ,802
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,094
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,389
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,797
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,908
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      526
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,135
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,135
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,658
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.10
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,007
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   415
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 18,009
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                18,068
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      208
<RECOVERIES>                                       168
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,554
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            18,554
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         18,554


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Jesus Fuentes, Appellant, v Karen Fuentes, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 560]

*485In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Willen, J.), entered August 1, 1996, which, after a hearing, inter alia, granted the mother’s cross petition for custody of the parties’ three children and, in effect, denied his petition for custody.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The best interests of the child are the paramount consideration in making any award of custody *(see Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer,*55 NY2d 89, 94 [1982]; *Matter of Ellen K. v John K.,*186 AD2d 656, 657 [1992]). Because any custody determination necessarily depends to a great extent upon an assessment of the character and credibility of the parties and witnesses, deference is accorded the hearing court’s findings *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 174 [1982]), which “will not be disturbed unless they lack a sound and substantial basis in the record” *(Kuncman v Kuncman,*188 AD2d 517, 518 [1992]). Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, the Family Court’s determination has a sound and substantial basis.

The appellant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to counsel at the custody hearing is without merit. After the appellant discharged his Legal Aid attorney, the Family Court urged him to seek new counsel a full 21/2 months before the hearing. The appellant failed to do so. On the first day of the hearing, the appellant was afforded another opportunity to apply for Legal Aid, but he refused to answer questions regarding his employment and financial status. The hearing was held on four separate days over a period of more than five months, yet there is no indication that the appellant made any effort to obtain counsel during that time. The appellant was given ample opportunity to present evidence and he participated fully in the examination of the witnesses. Under the circumstances, we find no error *(see Matter of Nilda S. v Dawn K.,*302 AD2d 237, 238 [2003]; *Iadicicco v Iadicicco,*270 AD2d 721, 722-723 [2000]; *Matter of Denise A.A. v David A.A.,*237 AD2d 680, 681-682 [1997]).

Finally, as the Law Guardian correctly points out, the issues raised on this appeal are largely academic, as the appellant is currently serving a cumulative prison sentence of 395/6 to 82 years, pursuant to a judgment of conviction rendered July 30, 1998 (as modified by this Court), which has since become final *(see People v Fuentes,*290 AD2d 563 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 710 [2002], *cert denied*537 US 1201 [2003]). During his period *486of incarceration, the appellant would be “clearly incapable of fulfilling the obligations of a custodial parent” *(Matter of Depuy-Wade v Wade,*298 AD2d 655, 656 [2002]), and it is clear that the appellant’s youngest son will have reached the age of majority well before any possibility of the appellant’s release. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Adams, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 175 (Monday, November 17, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10602]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ORDERS FOR WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2008

  Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that when 
the Senate completes its business today, it stand adjourned until 9:30 
a.m., Wednesday, November 19; that following the prayer and pledge, the 
Journal of proceedings be approved to date, the morning hour be deemed 
expired, the time for the two leaders be reserved for their use later 
in the day, and the Senate proceed to a period of morning business, 
with Senators permitted to speak for up to 10 minutes each; that 
following morning business, the Senate resume consideration of the 
motion to proceed to S. 3297.
  I further ask unanimous consent that with respect to the measures 
read for the first time, they be considered as having been read a 
second time on Tuesday for the purpose of placing the bills on the 
calendar with respect to rule XIV.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.17


 


WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:







INTER-MOUNTAIN CAPITAL CORP.


303 East Wacker Drive, Suite 1200


Chicago, Illinois 60601








	
  

	
Tax Serial No. ODC-1064







 


DEED OF RECONVEYANCE







NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:







Griffiths & Turner / GT Title Services, Inc. as Trustee under that certain Deed of Trust, dated September __, 2010, executed by Inter-Mountain Capital Corp., a Delaware corporation, as Trustor, in favor of World Series of Golf, Inc., a Nevada corporation, as Beneficiary, and recorded on September __, 2010 as Entry No. ____________, in the Official Records of Wasatch County, State of Utah, pursuant to the request of the Beneficiary thereunder, does hereby reconvey, without warranty, to the person or persons entitled thereto, the trust property now held by it as Trustee under such Trust Deed covering real property situated in Wasatch County, Utah described as follows:







All of Lot 64, Deer Crest Subdivision, Phase I, according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Wasatch County Recorder.







Together with the non-exclusive right of way over the access easements as shown on the recorded plats.







(Tax Serial No. ODC-1064)












DATED this ___ day of _______________, 20__.


 




	 	

TRUSTEE


 


GRIFFITHS & TURNER/GT TITLE SERVICES, INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	 	 
	 	Name:	 	 
	 	Title:	 	 
	 	 	 	 

















STATE OF ____________             )


: ss


COUNTY OF ___________           )







The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________________, 20___, by ______________________, who acknowledge to me that he is a duly authorized representative of Griffiths & Turner/ GT Title Services, Inc., the signer of this instrument.












 



	 	
 __________________________________________


Notary Public
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1598

_____________________________

LOU JOSEPH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Union County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

April 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jonathan E. Jordan of Rier Jordan, P.A., North Miami, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00455-CV

EX PARTE V.T.C.

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI06739

Honorable Solomon Casseb III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of expunction is 

AFFIRMED. We ORDER appellee V.T.C. is awarded the costs he incurred related to this appeal. 

SIGNED August 14, 2019.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Exhibit 13.01  Certification of Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Sean Boyd, Vice Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited (Agnico-Eagle), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:  The Annual Report on Form 20-F of
Agnico-Eagle for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Agnico-Eagle.  By:
  /s/ Sean
  BoydSean Boyd
  Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   Toronto, Canada
March 14,
2008  A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Agnico-Eagle and will be
retained by Agnico-Eagle and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.  1
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 23


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Energen Corporation on Forms  S-8 and S-3 (File No. 2-89855), Form S-3 (File
No. 333-00395), Form S-3 (File No. 333-11239) and Forms S-8 (File No. 33-27869,
File No. 33-46641, File No. 33-48504, and File No. 33-48505) of our report,
dated October 23, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of Energen Corporation as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, and for the years
ended September 30, 1996, 1995, and 1994, which report is incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Birmingham, Alabama
December 19, 1996
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 2 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 2

 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2015

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

    Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of Representatives 
that a quorum of the Senate is assembled and that the Senate is ready 
to proceed to business.
                                 <all>
```
II

Calendar No. 127

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 920

[Report No. 106–57]

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime Commission for fiscal

years 2000 and 2001.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 28, 1999

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. INOUYE, and

Mr. LOTT) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

MAY 27, 1999

Reported by Mr. MCCAIN, with an amendment

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime

Commission for fiscal years 2000 and 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Maritime

5 Commission Authorization Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 920 RS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FED2 ERAL MARITIME COMMISSION.

3 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Fed4 eral Maritime Commission—

5 (1) for fiscal year 2000, $15,685,000; and

6 (2) for fiscal year 2001, $16,312,000.

7 SEC. 3. CHAIRMAN DESIGNATED WITH SENATE CONFIRMA8 TION.

9 Section 102(b) of the Reorganization Plan No. 7 of

10 1961 (5 U.S.C. 903 nt) is amended by striking ‘‘President’’

11 and inserting ‘‘President, by and with the advice and con12 sent of the Senate,’’.

Calendar No. 127

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 920

[Report No. 106–57]

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime Commission for fiscal years 2000 and 2001.

MAY 27, 1999

Reported with an amendment