alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-11193 Conference Calendar

JOHNNY E. VALDERAS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CV-1009-Y

-------------------- February 13, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Johnny E. Valderas, Texas prisoner # 499117, filed in the district court a pleading styled as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, raising claims which attacked the validity of his continued incarceration and claims challenging his being forced to work at hard labor at the prison without compensation. The district court correctly treated the former claims as arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and the latter claims as arising under 42 U.S.C.No. 00-11193 -2- § 1983. See Patton v. Jefferson Corr. Ctr. , 136 F.3d 458, 460 (5th Cir. 1998). It dismissed the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 claims as time-barred, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) and dismissed the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e)(2)(B). Valderas now seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the dismissal as time-barred of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 claims and challenges the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. Valderas renews his argument that the respondent’s failure to release him mandatory supervision violates his due-process and equal-protection rights. Because he has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find debatable whether the district court erred in dismissing these claims as time-barred, COA is DENIED as to Valderas’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 584 (2000). Valderas also renews his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims that the being forced to work without compensation violates the Eighth Amendment, the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), and the Thirteenth Amendment. The Eighth Amendment claim is wholly without merit because Valderas has not made any allegation that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his physical condition in assigning his work detail. See Mendoza v. Lynaugh , 989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir. 1993). Even if it is assumed that FLSA coverage extends to inmates, Valderas’ FLSA claim fails because his sentence included the requirement that he work at hard labor. See Watson v. Graves , 909 F.2d 1549, 1553 n.7 (5th Cir. 1990); Wendt v. Lynaugh , 841 F.2d 629, 620 (5th Cir.. 1988);No. 00-11193 -3- Tex. Civ. Stat. art. 6166x (now repealed). Valderas’ claim that his forced labor constitutes involuntary servitude in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment claim fails for the same reason. See
Watson , 909 F.2d at 1552; Wendt , 841 F.2d at 620. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment on the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims is
AFFIRMED. COA DENIED; JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 88104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20434 and #20435; MINNESOTA Disaster Number MN-
20003]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Minnesota

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 4.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Minnesota 
(FEMA-4797-DR), dated June 28, 2024.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.

DATES: Issued on October 31, 2024.
    Incident Period: June 16, 2024 through July 4, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: December 2, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: March 28, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Minnesota, dated June 28, 2024, is hereby amended to extend the 
deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of 
this disaster to December 2, 2024. This notice is further amended to 
include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Dodge, Winona.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-25788 Filed 11-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES_OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10_Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I,  Richard  H.  Flake,
Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes_Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

          (1)       The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)       The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects,  the financial  condition and results
                    of  operations  of the  Company  as of and  for  the  period
                    covered by the Report.


                             /S/ RICHARD H. FLAKE
                             ----------------------------
                             Richard H. Flake
                             Executive Vice President
                             and Chief Financial Officer


Date:   May 9, 2005
QUICK 

CARDTM

Hazard Communication 

Standard Pictogram

The Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) requires 

pictograms on labels to alert users of the chemical 

hazards to which they may be exposed. Each pictogram 

consists of a symbol on a white background framed 

within a red border and represents a distinct hazard(s). 

The pictogram on the label is determined by the chemical 

hazard classification.

HCS Pictograms and Hazards

 Health Hazard 

• Carcinogen

• Mutagenicity

• Reproductive Toxicity

• Respiratory Sensitizer

• Target Organ Toxicity

• Aspiration Toxicity

 Flame 

• Flammables 

• Pyrophorics

• Self-Heating

• Emits Flammable Gas

• Self-Reactives

• Organic Peroxides

 Exclamation Mark

• Irritant (skin and eye)

• Skin Sensitizer

• Acute Toxicity (harmful)

• Narcotic Effects

• Respiratory Tract

 Irritant

• Hazardous to Ozone

 Layer (Non-Mandatory)

 Gas Cylinder 

• Gases Under Pressure

 Corrosion 

• Skin Corrosion/

 Burns

• Eye Damage

• Corrosive to Metals

 Exploding Bomb

• Explosives

• Self-Reactives

• Organic Peroxides

 

Flame Over Circle 

• Oxidizers

 Environment (Non-Mandatory) 

 

• Aquatic Toxicity

 Skull 

 and Crossbones

• Acute Toxicity 

 (fatal or toxic)

U.S. Department of Labor

OSHA 3491-01R 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000277595
<NAME> ENERGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      355,007
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    552,822
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         255,436
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        16,994
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  22,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,203,041
<COMMON>                                           304
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      216,384
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            185,561
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 400,860
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           353,932
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             168,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   18,648
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 261,601
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,203,041
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      555,595
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             6,789
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     459,794
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     466,583
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         95,801
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,775
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  90,787
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        37,769
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,018
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   53,018
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        20,029
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       27,166
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         105,043
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.75


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2223]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               HONORING THE MEMORY OF WILLIE HERD RUSHTON

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. JO BONNER

                               of alabama

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, October 3, 2008

  Mr. BONNER. Madam Speaker, the city of Mobile and indeed the entire 
nation recently lost a true American hero, and I rise today to honor 
the memory of Willie Herd Rushton and pay tribute to his memory.
  Many Americans came to know Mr. Rushton last year as his courageous 
story, along with those of other Mobilians, was told in the Ken Burns 
documentary series, ``The War.''
  Born in Nadawah, Alabama, Mr. Rushton grew up on a saw mill farm in 
Atmore. After graduating from high school, he moved to Mobile to work 
at the Coca-Cola Bottling Plant. He was drafted in the spring of 1943, 
just a year after getting married.
  He signed on with the Marines and was shipped to the Pacific in July 
1943. His son was born just one month later, a son he would not see for 
more than two years. Assigned to the 11th Depot Company, he served in 
the South Pacific from July 1943 until October 1944. He and his unit--a 
unit that sustained the highest casualty rate of any black Marine 
unit--took part in the invasion of Peleliu along with the 1st Marine 
Division.
  Mr. Rushton himself was wounded in the leg by shrapnel from a mortar 
round while on the island. Following his discharge in November of 1945, 
Mr. Rushton was awarded the Purple Heart as well as the Good Conduct 
Medal for his valor in service. He worked at Sears, Brookley Field and 
the United States Postal Service, where he stayed for 43 years. During 
his career with the Postal Service, his colleagues affectionately 
referred to Mr. Rushton as ``The Chief.''
  Madam Speaker, I rise to ask my colleagues to join me in remembering 
a true American hero and friend to many throughout Alabama, as well as 
a wonderful husband and devoted father. Mr. Rushton will be deeply 
missed by his family--his wife, Evelyn Bush Rushton; his two sons, 
Willie Herd Rushton Jr. and Derrick Rushton; his daughter, Deborah 
Rushton Campbell; his brother, John Lee Jones; his six grandchildren; 
and his six great grandchildren--as well as the many countless friends 
he leaves behind.
  Our thoughts and prayers are with them all at this difficult time.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         432,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               515,438
<PP&E>                                       4,191,370
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,267,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,680,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          677,379
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,546
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,141,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,680,062
<SALES>                                      1,869,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,869,919
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,160,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             179,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (470,588)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.64)
        

</TABLE>
EX-32.1 4 digitaltown10k022811ex32-1.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER SECTION 1350   Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Richard A. Pomije, the Chief Executive Officer of DigitalTown, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:   May 4, 2011Signed:/s/ Richard A. PomijeName:Richard A. PomijeTitle:Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., November 13, 2024

# PLACE:

                        Members of the public wishing to attend the meeting must submit a written request at least 24 hours prior to the meeting to receive dial-in information. All requests must be sent to                         *SecretarytotheBoard@rrb.gov*.                    

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Introduction of New Chief Information Officer

Office of Legislative Affairs Briefing

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Stephanie Hillyard, Secretary to the Board, (312) 751-4920.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: October 30, 2024.

Stephanie Hillyard,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2024-25653 Filed 10-31-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
Order entered July 12, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00261
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.B. AND E.B., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 53861
- 2020

O RDER On June 1, 2021, court reporter Jan Dugger informed the Court that appellant had neither requested , nor made arrangements to pay for, the reporter’s
record

. Accordingly, we directed appell ant to file written verification he had requested the record and paid or made arrangements to pay for the record or was entitled to proceed without payment of costs under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145. Appellant responded by submitting a copy of his r equest for the reporter’s
record . The request was filed with the trial court clerk on May 11, 2021. Because it appears Ms. Dugger may not have received the request and might not have informed appellant of the cost for the record as a result , we ORDER Ms.Dugger to file , no later than July 2 2 , 2021, written verification she notified

appellant of the cost for the record , the date of notification, and whether payment or payment arrangements have been made.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Dugger and the parties.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
#### Eudean Juste et al., Plaintiffs, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Defendants. Louis C. Fiabane, Nonparty Appellant; Arye, Lustig & Sassower, P.C., Nonparty Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 597]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., nonparty Louis C. Fiabane appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.H.O.), dated September 23, 2003, which, after a hearing, awarded him an attorney’s fee in the amount of only $1,116.33.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof awarding Louis C. Fiabane $1,176.33 and substituting therefor a provision awarding him $2,500.00; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the appellant payable by the respondent.

An award of a reasonable attorney’s fee is within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court based upon such factors as the time and labor required, the difficulty of the issues involved, the skill required to handle the matter, and the effectiveness of the legal work performed *(see Ebrahimian v Long Is. R.R.,*269 AD2d 488 [2000]; *Olson v City of New York,*257 AD2d 653 [1999]). The issue of the apportionment of attorneys’ fees is controlled by the circumstances and equities of each particular case *(see Grossman v Grossman,*260 AD2d 602 [1999]), and the Supreme Court is in the best position to assess these factors. Under the facts of this case, however, we find that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in the award of the attorney’s fee to the extent indicated herein *(cf. Matter of Gary E. Rosenberg, P.C. v McCormack,*250 AD2d 679 [1998]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10422]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                CWO RICHARD R. LEE POST OFFICE BUILDING

  The bill (H.R. 6834) to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 4 South Main Street in Wallingford, 
Connecticut, as the ``CWO Richard R. Lee Post Office Building,'' was 
considered, ordered to a third reading, read the third time, and 
passed.

                          ____________________
```