alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         4,073,968
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    60,067,767
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,784,590
<PP&E>                                         250,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 75,902,708<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          45,194,471
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       349,345
<OTHER-SE>                                     30,358,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   75,902,708
<SALES>                                        22,073,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,869,339
<CGS>                                          19,826,265
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19,826,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,476,782
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                564,569
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            564,569
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   564,569
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.02


<FN>
    <F1> - Includes $5,726,192 of Goodwill
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### J. G. MILLER et al. v. Z. GROOME.

*Reference*— Exceptions.

In a reference under *The Code,*it is the duty of the trial Court to review and pass upon all the exceptions to the report of the referee, whether to the conclusions of law or findings of fact, and set aside, modify or confirm them according to his judgment; his conclusions upon the exceptions to matters of law are reviewable,.but those upon the facts are not.

Civil, ACTION, heard upon exceptions to the report of a referee at February Term, 1891, of Guilford Superior Court, before *Boylcin, J.*

The referee gave judgment for defendant, and plaintiff filed exceptions to his report. Upon the call of the case, the pleadings, report, order of reference and exceptions • were read, when his Honor asked if the law laid down by the referee was conceded to be correct on the facts found, and the plaintiff answered “ Yes.” His Honor further asked if the testimony upon which the findings of fact were made was conflicting and contradictory, and being answered by the *149plaintiff that it was, he declined to hear the testimony, overruled the exceptions, and the plaintiff appealed from the judgment rendered, assigning as error that his Honor did not hear the testimony and pass upon the same, and that he overruled the exceptions.

*Mr. J. T. Morehead,*for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Dillard & King*(by brief) and *J. E. Boyd,*for defendant.

Davis, J.:

This was a reference under *The Code,*and the referee, as was his duty, reported the facts found and his conclusions of law separately, and he also reported the evidence upon which he found the facts, and, as a matter of right, either party could file exceptions, appeal and have the report reviewed by the Judge of the Superior Court, whose duty it is to consider the exceptions and set aside, modify or confirm the report, according to his judgment, and his ruling upon the findings of fact is conclusive upon this Court, but his rulings upon questions of law are subject to review here. *Commissioners*v. *Magnin,*85 N. C., 114, and , cases cited; *McNeill*v. *Hodges,*105 N. C., 52. The plaintiff filed exceptions to the referee’s report, both as to findings of fact and conclusions of law. One of the exceptions was to the competency of testimony, which, if overruled, would be the subject of review in this Court. It was clearly the right of the appellant to have the report of the referee reviewed by the Judge. *The Code,*§ 423. It was perfectly competent, upon review, if he so thought, to adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law ©f the referee, and then they wTould become the findings and conclusions of the Court; but it was error in his Honor to summarily dispose of the exceptions by overruling them and confirming the report, without reviewing and passing upon them judicially.

Error.
#### J. B. CARVER and wife v. W. O. BRADY and A. G. BRADY.

*Injunction*— Mortgage—Usury—Notice.

1. A mortgagee will not be restrained because he failed to give mortgagor ninety days’ notice of his intention to foreclose. Such notice is unnecessary.

2. Before one can ask the Court, by injunction, to restrain a sale under mortgage, on account of usurious interest charged, he must pay what is justly due, principal and-interest. He who would have equity must do equity.

Civil action, pending in Cumberland Superior Court, and heard, upon an application for an injunction, by *Gilmer, J.,*at May Term, 1889.

The motion was by plaintiff for an injunction to prevent the defendants from selling the plaintiff’s land under mortgage, as set forth in complaint us'ed as an affidavit.

The Court refused to grant the injunction, and plaintiff excepted.

*220The plaintiff insisted that the Court should restrain the defendants from selling until they had given plaintiff ninety days’ notice of their intention to foreclose.

The Court refused to so order, and plaintiff excepted.

The plaintiff insisted that the order of the Court should restrain the defendants from collecting anything more than the principal money of his debt, because the defendants had received and reserved and taken usurious interest, and had thereby forfeited all interest, as provided by law.

The Court declined to so rule, and plaintiff excepted and appealed.

*Mr. Thomas H. Sutton {Mr. N. W. Ray*filed a brief), for plaintiff.

*Mr. John W. Hinsdale*filed a brief for defendants.

Shepherd, J.:

1. “ The plaintiff insisted that the Court should restrain the defendants from selling until they had given the plaintiff ninety days’ notice of their intention to foreclose.” It has been fully settled by this Court that such notice is unnecessary. *Bridgers*v. Morris, 90 N. C., 32; *Manning*v. *Elliott,*92 N. C., 48.

2. The plaintiff further insisted “ that the order of the Cpurt should restrain the defendants from collecting anything more than the principal money of his debt, because the defendants had received and reserved usurious interest, and had thereby forfeited all interest, as provided by law.” The contract here was to pay eight per cent, interest, and this the plaintiff must pay, together with the principal, when he seeks the equitable aid of the Court. This question is settled in *Cook*v. *Patterson,*103 N. C., 127, where it is said that, “when the plaintiff asks the Court to interfere-and grant an injunction till the true amount can be ascertained, he is deemed subject to the rule that one who seeks equitable *221relief must do equity. The Court will, therefore, compel him, as a condition upon which the aid of the Court is extended to him, to pay the amount that is justly due.” *Manning*v. Elliott, *supra; Purnell*v. Vaughan, 82 N. C., 134; *Simonton*v. *Lanier,*71 N. C., 498.

We see no reason to depart from the principles declared in these well-considered cases.

Affirmed.
ex108.htm


Exhibit 10.8


 


Filed as a PDF Reference


 



Summary of Material Terms of Hua Lu Agreement







For the 1,4 butanediol project, Davy cooperated with Hua Lu Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Hua Lu”), a Chinese engineering company having Level I of PRC national standard engineering designing qualification. Zibo Jiazhou Chemical entered into a contract with Hua Lu on July 25, 2009. The total contract price is RMB5,750,000 or US$846,975 as of June 30, 2010, in which RMB860,000 or US$ 126,683 as of July 29, 2009 shall be paid as deposit within 10 days after execution of the contract and the other instalments shall be paid within 10 days after delivery of corresponding designing documentation.
----

----

| 1. | the annual                report on Form 10-KSB of Falcon Ridge Development Inc. for the year                ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Falcon                Ridge Development Inc.,. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        |
|--------|
|   |   |   |
|   |   |

|                                                |                                                          |                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                                |                                                          |
|                                           |                                                     |                                |
| Dated:  January                  14, 2008 |                                                          | /s/ Karen                  Y. Duran |
|                                                | Karen                    Y. Duran,                            |
|                                                | Chief                    Financial                    Officer |

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  Schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
condensed  financial  statements for the period ended  September 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         497,319
<SECURITIES>                                   15,930
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,777,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (795,832)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,401,346
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,187,757
<PP&E>                                         2,051,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,146,109)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,015,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,039,325
<BONDS>                                        154,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       12,373
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,809,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,015,991
<SALES>                                        20,014,152
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               20,014,152
<CGS>                                          10,935,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,935,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               335,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             301,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,714,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,714,637)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.63)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 25, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 541 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-164, K2025-162.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-25313 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 343 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 343

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 100 
  percent of the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 1999

 Mr. Bond (for himself, Mr. Burns, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Coverdell, 
Mr. Hagel, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Craig, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Helms, Ms. Collins, Mr. 
Specter, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Hutchinson) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 100 
  percent of the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Self-Employed Health Insurance 
Fairness Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS OF SELF-EMPLOYED 
              INDIVIDUALS INCREASED.

    (a) In General.--Section 162(l)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to special rules for health insurance costs of self-
employed individuals) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Allowance of deduction.--In the case of an individual 
        who is an employee within the meaning of section 401(c)(1), 
        there shall be allowed as a deduction under this section an 
        amount equal to the amount paid during the taxable year for 
        insurance which constitutes medical care for the taxpayer, the 
        taxpayer's spouse, and dependents.''
    (b) Clarification of Limitations on Other Coverage.--The first 
sentence of section 162(l)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended to read as follows: ``Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any 
taxpayer for any calendar month for which the taxpayer participates in 
any subsidized health plan maintained by any employer (other than an 
employer described in section 401(c)(4)) of the taxpayer or the spouse 
of the taxpayer.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 722

To provide for the immediate application of certain orders relating to the

amendment, modification, suspension, or revocation of certificates under

chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. BURNS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr.

BREAUX, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. FRIST) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To provide for the immediate application of certain orders

relating to the amendment, modification, suspension, or

revocation of certificates under chapter 447 of title 49,

United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS, MODIFICATIONS, SUSPENSIONS,

4 AND REVOCATIONS OF CERTIFICATES.

5 Section 44709 of title 49, United States Code, is

6 amended—

7 (1) in subsection (e)—
2

•S 722 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘When’’ and inserting ‘‘(1)

2 Except as provided in paragraph (2), if’’; and

3 (B) by striking ‘‘However, if’’ and all that

4 follows through the end of the subsection and

5 inserting the following:

6 ‘‘(2) If the Administrator determines, in the order,

7 that an emergency exists and safety in air commerce or

8 air transportation requires the order to be effective

9 immediately—

10 ‘‘(A) subject to subparagraph (B), the order

11 shall be in effect unless the Administrator is not

12 able to prove to the Board, upon an inquiry of the

13 Board, the existence of an emergency that requires

14 the immediate application of the order in the inter15 est of safety in air commerce and air transportation;

16 and

17 ‘‘(B) the Board shall—

18 ‘‘(i) not later than 5 days after the filing

19 of an appeal under paragraph (1), make a dis20 position concerning the issues of the appeal

21 that are related to the existence of an emer22 gency referred to in subparagraph (A); and

23 ‘‘(ii) not later than 60 days after the filing

24 of an appeal under paragraph (1), make a final

25 disposition of the appeal.
3

•S 722 IS

1 ‘‘(3) If the Administrator determines, in the order,

2 the existence of an emergency described in paragraph

3 (2)(A), the appellant may request a hearing by the Board,

4 under procedures promulgated by the Board, on the issues

5 of the appeal that are related to the existence of the emer6 gency. Such request shall be made not later than 48 hours

7 after the issuance of the order. If an appellant requests

8 a hearing under this paragraph, the Board shall hold the

9 hearing not later than 48 hours after receiving that re10 quest.’’; and

11 (2) in subsection (f), by inserting ‘‘by further

12 order’’ after ‘‘the Administrator decides’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5

<LEGEND>                   The Schedule Contains Summary Financial
                           Information Extracted From the Combined Balance
                           Sheets as of December 31, 1996 of LaSalle
                           Partners Limited Partnership and Subsidiaries
                           and LaSalle Partners Management Limited
                           Partnership and Subsidiaries and the Related
                           Combined Statements of Earnings for the Twelve
                           Months then Ended and is Qualified in its
                           Entirety by Reference to Such Financial
                           Statements.

<MULTIPLIER>               1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<CASH>                                    7,207
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            87,283
<ALLOWANCES>                              2,100
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         98,723
<PP&E>                                   37,859
<DEPRECIATION>                           23,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          156,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    75,808
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            156,614
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        175,967
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           148,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            986
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        5,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          21,171
<INCOME-TAX>                              1,207
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      19,964
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             19,964
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        



</TABLE>