[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 87279-87282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Parts 744 and 746

[Docket No. 241028-0281]
RIN 0694-AJ93


Implementation of Additional Export Controls Against Russia and 
Belarus Under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR); and 
Clarifications

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) 
makes changes to the export controls against Russia and Belarus under 
the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). This final rule expands 
the scope of the Russian and Belarusian Industry Sector Sanctions by 
imposing controls on nine key precursors for riot control agents and a 
chemical weapon that Russia has deployed against Ukraine in violation 
of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). This final rule also makes 
adjustments to exclusions, exceptions, and licensing policy for 
exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to certain components of 
the governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations that are in 
Russia and Belarus. Lastly, this final rule clarifies that the Russia/
Belarus-Military End User and Procurement Foreign-Direct Product (FDP) 
rule and the EAR's other Entity List FDP rules' license requirements 
extend to or within any destination or to any end user or party that 
otherwise meets the criteria. This final rule is being published 
concurrently with a BIS final rule, ``Additions and Revisions of 
Entities to the Entity List'' (RIN 0694-AJ94), which includes 
additional changes related to export controls related to Russia and 
Belarus.

DATES: This rule is effective November 1, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions on this final 
rule, contact Collmann Griffin, Senior Policy Advisor, International 
Policy Office, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, 
Phone: 202-482-1430, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#54233d38383d35397a33263d32323d3a14363d277a303b377a333b22"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3047595c5c59515d1e5742595656595e705259431e545f531e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For questions on the Entity List changes in this final rule, 
contact the Chair, End-User Review Committee, Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Export Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, 
Department of Commerce, Phone: (202) 482-5991, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#befbecfdfedcd7cd90dad1dd90d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e8adbaaba88a819bc68c878bc68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>. 
For emails, include ``Russia and Belarus, October 2024 export control 
measures'' in the subject line.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

A. Export Controls Implemented Against Russia and Belarus

    In response to Russia's February 2022 full-scale invasion of 
Ukraine, BIS imposed extensive export controls on Russia under the EAR 
as part of the final rule, ``Implementation of Sanctions Against Russia 
Under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)'' (``Russia Sanctions 
Rule'') (87 FR 12226, March 3, 2022). To address Belarus's complicity 
in the invasion, BIS imposed similar export controls on Belarus under 
the EAR in a final rule, ``Implementation of Sanctions Against 
Belarus'' (``Belarus Sanctions Rule'') (87 FR 13048, March 6, 2022). 
Since March 2022, BIS has published numerous final rules strengthening 
the export controls on Russia and Belarus, including measures 
undertaken in coordination with U.S. allies and partners.

B. Overview of This Final Rule

    BIS is amending the EAR (15 CFR parts 730-744) to strengthen export 
controls against Russia and Belarus by expanding the scope of the 
Russian and Belarusian Industry Sector Sanctions and clarify the 
applicability of the Entity List FDP rules. BIS in this final rule is 
also making adjustments to exclusions, exceptions, and licensing policy 
for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) of items for the 
official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the governments 
of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations that are located in Russia 
and Belarus.
    The Export Control Reform Act (ECRA) provides the legal basis for 
BIS's principal authorities and serves as the authority under which BIS 
issues this rule.
    The three sets of changes this final rule makes are described in 
section II as follows:
    A. Additions to supplement no. 6 to part 746 to control nine key 
precursors for riot control agents and a chemical weapon that Russia 
has deployed against Ukraine;
    B. Changes related to governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 
destinations for certain exclusions, license exception eligibility, and 
licensing policy; and
    C. Clarifying that the Entity List FDP rules' license requirement 
extends to or within any destination or to any end user or party that 
otherwise meets the criteria.

II. Amendments to the EAR

A. Additions to Supplement No. 6 to Part 746 To Control Key Precursors 
for Riot Control Agents and a Chemical Weapon That Russia Has Deployed 
Against Ukraine

    The U.S. Department of Commerce is expanding controls under the EAR 
to include certain chemical precursors that are essential for the 
``production'' of chemical riot control agents (RCAs) and chloropicrin 
that Russia has deployed against Ukraine in violation of the Chemical 
Weapons Convention (CWC). These new regulatory restrictions, which are 
specific to Russia and Belarus, aim to limit the use of these chemical 
precursors in the context of the war in Ukraine.
    RCAs such as tear gas and other crowd dispersal chemicals have the 
potential for misuse in the context of armed conflict. While RCAs are 
commonly used by law enforcement, their use as a method of warfare is 
prohibited by Article I of the CWC. Chloropicrin is a toxic chemical 
included on Schedule 3 of the CWC's Annex on Chemicals. Its use against 
Ukrainian armed forces constitutes use of a chemical weapon and is also 
prohibited under Article I of the CWC.
    On April 4, 2024, the Department of State published its annual 
report to Congress on Compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention 
(CWC), which stated that Russia had used RCAs as a method of warfare 
against Ukrainian forces in violation of the CWC. This report concluded 
that ``the United States assesses that Russia has repeatedly used RCAs 
as a method of warfare across the frontlines in Ukraine.'' On May 1, 
2024, the Department of State announced that it had made a 
determination pursuant to the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control 
and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 (CBW Act of 1991) (22 U.S.C. 5604-
5605) that Russia had used chloropicrin against Ukrainian troops in 
violation of the CWC (see May 1, 2024 State Dept. Fact Sheet (Imposing 
New Measures on Russia for its Full-Scale War and Use of Chemical 
Weapons Against Ukraine)). On June 7, 2024, in connection with this 
determination under the CBW Act of 1991, the Acting

[[Page 87280]]

Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs imposed restrictions on 
Russia, including on arms sales and related financing. The Federal 
Register Notice announcing these restrictions made reference to the 
export controls that Commerce maintains on Russia under parts 744 and 
746 (see 89 FR 48701, June 7, 2024).
    Russia's use of RCAs as a method of warfare and its use of 
chloropicrin as a chemical weapon during its war of aggression in 
Ukraine raise concerns about Russia's further production and 
weaponization of these chemicals. Controlling the export of key 
chemical precursors, therefore, represents a critical step toward 
preventing the misuse of these chemicals in furtherance of Russia's 
military efforts.
    This final rule builds upon a BIS final rule that imposed controls 
on two precursors of chloropicrin, nitromethane and picric acid, as 
part of a set of restrictions on Russia and Belarus by targeting 
chemicals that could be useful for Russia's chemical and biological 
weapons production capabilities or diverted from Belarus to Russia for 
these activities of concern (87 FR 57068, September 16, 2022). Adding 
additional chemical precursors of chloropicrin in this current rule 
further supports that objective.
    In assessing whether to impose these new controls, it is important 
to acknowledge that the chemical precursors listed for control play a 
significant role in civilian applications. For example, these chemical 
precursors are used in the production of pharmaceuticals for treating 
respiratory ailments and in anesthetic formulations. In agriculture, 
these precursor chemicals can function as pest control agents or can be 
used for the production of fertilizers, both crucial to food security 
and medical treatments. Recognizing these civilian applications, these 
new controls are narrowly tailored to apply only to Russia and Belarus. 
The restrictions address the CWC Treaty's objective regarding the need 
to guard against the potential misuse of these chemical precursors 
while ensuring continuing exports, reexports, and transfers (in-
country) as part of supply chains related to legitimate use under the 
CWC, particularly in medical and agricultural sectors, in all 
destinations, which for purposes of license applications for Russia and 
Belarus is addressed under the case-by-case license review policy under 
Sec.  746.8(b)(3)(iii).
    Therefore, this final rule adds a new paragraph (i) (Precursors for 
riot control agents and chloropicrin as follows) to supplement no. 6 to 
part 746 to control certain precursors of CS (o-
Chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile or o-Chlorobenzalmalononitrile) (CAS 
2698-41-1); CN (Phenylacyl chloride or w-Chloroacetophenone) (CAS 532-
27-4); and Trichloro(nitro)methane (Chloropicrin--CAS 76-06-2) and CR 
(Dibenzoxazpine--CAS 257-07-8). Specifically, this final rule adds 
paragraphs (i)(1) through (9) to describe these chemical precursors 
that will be controlled under the EAR's Russian and Belarusian Industry 
Sector Sanctions. The chemical precursors listed below may be utilized 
in the production of RCAs and chloropicrin:

1. Malononitrile (CAS 109-77-3)
2. 2-Chlorobenzaldehyde (CAS 89-98-5)
3. 2-Chlorobenzyl Alcohol (CAS 17849-38-6)
4. 2-Chlorobenzylamine (CAS 89-97-4)
5. Benzene, 1-chloro-2-(dimethoxymethyl) (CAS 70380-66-4)
6. Acetophenone (CAS 98-86-2)
7. Chloroacetyl Chloride (CAS 79-04-9)
8. Chloroform (CAS 67-66-3)
9. o-Aminophenol (CAS 95-55-6)

    These expanded controls will supplement the existing CCL controls 
under ECCNs 1A984, 1C607, and 1C350. BIS estimates that these changes 
will result in an increase of ten license applications submitted to BIS 
annually.

B. Changes Related to Governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 
Destinations for Certain Exclusions, License Exception Eligibility, and 
Licensing Policy

    This final rule makes the following changes to reduce the licensing 
burden on certain government entities located in Russia and Belarus by 
granting them the same eligibility for certain exclusions, license 
exceptions, and licensing policy as is currently available for private 
sector entities headquartered in Country Group A:5 and A:6 countries.
    1. Addition of license exception eligibility in Sec.  
746.8(c)(2)(vi) for official business of diplomatic or consular 
missions of the governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations
    In Sec.  746.8, this final rule expands the scope of paragraph 
(c)(2)(vi) to add the phrase ``or for the official business of 
diplomatic or consular missions of the governments of Country Group A:5 
and A:6 destinations'' that are operating in Russia or Belarus as 
entities eligible under this paragraph to receive items under License 
Exception Encryption commodities, software, and technology (ENC). In 
order to receive items under License Exception ENC, the export, 
reexport, or transfer (in-country) would also need to not be restricted 
under Sec.  740.2 and meet all of the applicable terms and conditions 
of License Exception ENC under Sec.  740.17. The addition of license 
exception eligibility for the embassies and consulates of Country Group 
A:5 and A:6 destinations is consistent with U.S. national security and 
foreign policy interests. BIS decided to make this change after 
reviewing a question from the public that asked whether License 
Exception ENC could be used for an export that otherwise met the terms 
of License Exception ENC for an export to an embassy for the official 
use of a Country Group A:5 and A:6 destination. Prior to this final 
rule, paragraph (c)(2) of Sec.  746.8 would have excluded the use of 
License Exception ENC by such government entities.
    BIS estimates that these changes will result in a decrease of five 
license applications submitted to BIS annually.
    2. Addition to exclusion in Sec.  746.8(a)(12)(ii) for official 
business of diplomatic or consular missions of the governments of 
Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations.
    In Sec.  746.8(a)(12)(ii) (Mass market encryption commodities and 
software, and software designated EAR99), this final rule revises this 
paragraph to add a new exclusion under paragraph (a)(12)(ii)(F) to 
specify that exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) for the 
official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the governments 
of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations that are operating in Russia 
or Belarus are also within the scope of this paragraph (a)(12) 
exclusion. This final rule also revises paragraph (a)(12)(ii)(D) to 
remove the word `or' and revises paragraph (a)(12)(E) to remove the 
period and add a semi-colon and the word `or' at the end of the 
paragraph to reflect the addition of new paragraph (a)(12)(ii)(F).
    3. Addition of governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 
destinations to the case-by-case licensing policy under Sec.  
746.8(b)(3)(vi).
    In Sec.  746.8(b)(3)(vi), this final rule revises the case-by-case 
licensing policy for license applications submitted pursuant to 
paragraphs (a)(1), (2), and (4) through (8) of this section, to add a 
new paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(F). With this revision, the case-by-case 
license review policy to determine whether the transaction in question 
would benefit the Russian or Belarusian government or defense sector 
will also apply to applications involving items destined for official 
business of governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations that 
are operating in Russia or Belarus. This final rule also revises 
paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(D) to remove the word `or' and revises paragraph 
(b)(3)(vi)(E) to remove

[[Page 87281]]

the period and add a semi-colon and the word `or' at the end of the 
paragraph to reflect the addition of new paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(F).

C. Clarifying That the Entity List-Related FDP Rules License 
Requirement Extends to or Within Any Destination or to Any End User or 
Party That Otherwise Meets the Criteria

    This final rule revises Sec. Sec.  744.11 and 746.8 of the EAR to 
clarify that the three Entity List-related FDP rules' license 
requirements extend to or within any destination or to any end user or 
party. This final rule makes clarifying changes to Sec.  744.11 by 
revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i) (Footnote 1 entities) and (a)(2)(iv) 
(Footnote 4 entities) to specify that parties may not, without a 
license, reexport, export from abroad, or transfer (in-country) to or 
within any destination or to any end user or party any foreign-produced 
item subject to the EAR pursuant to the referenced FDP rules under 
Sec.  734.9(e)(1) or (2), respectively. Specifically, this final rule 
adds the phrase `to or within any destination or to any end user or 
party' to clarify the scope of this license requirement. This final 
rule makes the same clarifying revision in Sec.  746.8(a)(3) (Russia/
Belarus-Military End User and Procurement FDP rule) (Footnote 3 
entities).
    BIS estimates these changes described in section II.C will not 
result in any change to the number of license applications submitted to 
BIS annually.
Savings Clause
    For the changes being made in this final rule, shipments of items 
removed from eligibility for a License Exception or export, reexport, 
or transfer (in-country) without a license (NLR) as a result of this 
regulatory action that were en route aboard a carrier to a port of 
export, reexport, or transfer (in-country), on November 1, 2024, 
pursuant to actual orders for export, reexport, or transfer (in-
country) to or within a foreign destination, may proceed to that 
destination under the previous eligibility for a License Exception or 
export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) without a license (NLR), 
provided the export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) is completed no 
later than on December 2, 2024.
Export Control Reform Act of 2018
    On August 13, 2018, the President signed into law the John S. 
McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which 
included the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) (codified, as 
amended, at 50 U.S.C. 4801-4852). ECRA provides the legal basis for 
BIS's principal authorities and serves as the authority under which BIS 
issues this rule. In particular, and as noted elsewhere, Section 1753 
of ECRA (50 U.S.C. 4812) authorizes the regulation of exports, 
reexports, and transfers (in-country) of items subject to U.S. 
jurisdiction. Further, Section 1754(a)(1)-(16) of ECRA (50 U.S.C. 
4813(a)(1)-(16)) authorizes, inter alia: (1) the establishment of a 
list of controlled items; (2) the prohibition of unauthorized exports, 
reexports, and transfers (in-country); (3) the requirement of licenses 
or other authorizations for exports, reexports, and transfers (in-
country) of controlled items; (4) the apprising of the public of 
changes in policy, regulations, and procedures; and (5) any other 
action necessary to carry out ECRA that is not otherwise prohibited by 
law. Pursuant to Section 1762(a) of ECRA (50 U.S.C. 4821(a)), these 
changes can be imposed in a final rule without prior notice and 
comment.
Rulemaking Requirements
    1. BIS has examined the impact of this rule as required by 
Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866, 13563, and 14094, which direct agencies 
to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives 
and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that 
maximize net benefits (e.g., potential economic, environmental, public, 
health, and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Pursuant 
to E.O. 12866, as amended, this final rule has not been determined to 
be a ``significant regulatory action.''
    2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is 
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty 
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the 
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 
3501 et seq.), unless that collection of information displays a 
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. 
This rule involves the following OMB-approved collections of 
information subject to the PRA:
    <bullet> 0694-0088, ``Simple Network Application Process and 
Multipurpose Application Form,'' which carries a burden hour estimate 
of 29.4 minutes for a manual or electronic submission;
    <bullet> 0694-0096 ``Five Year Records Retention Period,'' which 
carries a burden hour estimate of less than 1 minute for a manual or 
electronic submission; and
    <bullet> 0607-0152 ``Automated Export System (AES) Program,'' which 
carries a burden hour estimate of 3 minutes per electronic submission.
    BIS estimates that these new controls on Russia and Belarus under 
the EAR will result in an increase of five license applications 
submitted annually to BIS. However, the additional burden falls within 
the existing estimates currently associated with these control numbers. 
Additional information regarding these collections of information--
including all background materials--can be found at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain by using the search function to enter 
either the title of the collection or the OMB Control Number.
    3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications 
as that term is defined under E.O. 13132.
    4. Pursuant to section 1762 of ECRA (50 U.S.C. 4821), this action 
is exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) 
requirements for notice of proposed rulemaking, opportunity for public 
participation, and delay in effective date. While section 1762 of ECRA 
provides sufficient authority for such an exemption, this action is 
also independently exempt from these APA requirements because it 
involves a military or foreign affairs function of the United States (5 
U.S.C. 553(a)(1)).
    5. Because neither the Administrative Procedure Act nor any other 
law requires that notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for 
public comment be given for this rule, the analytical requirements of 
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are not 
applicable. Accordingly, no Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is 
required, and none has been prepared.

List of Subjects

15 CFR Part 744

    Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.

15 CFR Part 746

    Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, parts 744 and 746 of the Export Administration 
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 774) are revised to read as 
follows:

PART 744--END-USE AND END-USER CONTROLS

0
1. The authority citation for part 744 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. 4801-4852; 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50 
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 
1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.

[[Page 87282]]

608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 13026, 
61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 
CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., 
p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice 
of November 8, 2022, 87 FR 68015, 3 CFR, 2022 Comp., p. 563; Notice 
of September 18, 2024, 89 FR 77011 (September 20, 2024).


0
2. Section 744.11 is amended by revising the first sentence of 
paragraph (a)(2)(i) and the first sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(iv) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  744.11   License requirements that apply to entities acting or at 
significant risk of acting contrary to the national security or foreign 
policy interests of the United States.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) Footnote 1 entities. You may not, without a license or license 
exception, reexport, export from abroad, or transfer (in-country) to or 
within any destination or to any end user or party any foreign-produced 
item subject to the EAR pursuant to Sec.  734.9(e)(1) of the EAR.
    * * *
* * * * *
    (iv) Footnote 4 entities. You may not, without a license, reexport, 
export from abroad, or transfer (in-country) to or within any 
destination or to any end user or party any foreign-produced item 
subject to the EAR pursuant to Sec.  734.9(e)(2) of the EAR. * * *
* * * * *

PART 746--EMBARGOES AND OTHER SPECIAL CONTROLS

0
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 746 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. 4801-4852; 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50 
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 287c; Sec 1503, Pub. L. 108-11, 117 
Stat. 559; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et 
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12854, 58 FR 36587, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 
614; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; E.O. 13222, 
66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13338, 69 FR 26751, 3 
CFR, 2004 Comp., p 168; Presidential Determination 2003-23, 68 FR 
26459, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p. 320; Presidential Determination 2007-7, 
72 FR 1899, 3 CFR, 2006 Comp., p. 325; Notice of May 8, 2024, 89 FR 
40355 (May 9, 2024).


0
4. Section 746.8 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(3), (a)(12)(ii)(D) and (E);
0
b. Adding paragraph (a)(12)(ii)(F);
0
c. Revising paragraphs (b)(3)(vi)(D) and (E);
0
d. Adding paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(F); and
0
e. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(vi).
    The additions and revisions read as follows:


Sec.  746.8   Sanctions against Russia and Belarus.

    (a) * * *
* * * * *
    (3) Russia/Belarus-Military End User and Procurement FDP rule. A 
license is required to reexport, export from abroad, or transfer (in-
country) to or within any destination or to any end user or party any 
foreign-produced item subject to the EAR under Sec.  734.9(g) of the 
EAR.
* * * * *
    (12) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (D) Wholly owned subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices of 
companies headquartered in countries from Country Group A:5 and A:6 in 
supplement no. 1 to part 740;
    (E) Joint ventures between two or more companies headquartered in 
Country Group A:5 and A:6 in supplement no. 1 to part 740, including 
the wholly owned subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices of such joint 
ventures; or
    (F) For official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the 
governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations.
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (vi) * * *
    (D) The wholly owned subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices of 
companies headquartered in countries from Country Group A:5 and A:6 in 
supplement no. 1 to part 740;
    (E) Joint ventures of companies headquartered in Country Groups A:5 
and A:6 with other companies headquartered in Country Groups A:5 and 
A:6; or
    (F) For official business of governments of Country Group A:5 and 
A:6 destinations.
    (vii) Applications for companies headquartered in Country Groups 
A:5 and A:6 to support civil telecommunications infrastructure.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (vi) License Exception Encryption commodities, software, and 
technology (ENC) for civil end-users that are wholly-owned U.S. 
subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices; foreign subsidiaries, 
branches, or sales offices of U.S. companies that are joint ventures 
with other U.S. companies; joint ventures of U.S. companies with 
companies headquartered in countries from Country Group A:5 and A:6 in 
supplement no. 1 to part 740 of the EAR countries; the wholly-owned 
subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices of companies headquartered in 
countries from Country Group A:5 and A:6 in supplement no. 1 to part 
740; joint ventures of companies headquartered in Country Group A:5 and 
A:6 with other companies headquartered in Country Groups A:5 and A:6; 
or for official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the 
governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations (Sec. Sec.  
740.13(c) and 740.17 of the EAR).

0
5. Supplement no. 6 to part 746 is amended by adding paragraph (i) to 
read as follows:

Supplement No. 6 to Part 746--Russian and Belarusian Industry Sector 
Sanctions Pursuant to Sec.  746.8(a)(6)

    (i) Pre-cursors for riot control agents and chloropicrin as 
follows:
    (1) Malononitrile (CAS 109-77-3);
    (2) 2-Chlorobenzaldehyde (CAS 89-98-5);
    (3) 2-Chlorobenzyl Alcohol (CAS 17849-38-6);
    (4) 2-Chlorobenzylamine (CAS 89-97-4);
    (5) Benzene, 1-chloro-2-(dimethoxymethyl) (CAS 70380-66-4);
    (6) Acetophenone (CAS 98-86-2);
    (7) Chloroacetyl Chloride (CAS 79-04-9);
    (8) Chloroform (CAS 67-66-3); and
    (9) o-Aminophenol (CAS 95-55-6).

Matthew S. Borman,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Strategic Trade and Technology 
Security.
[FR Doc. 2024-25445 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>