alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 698 Reported in Senate (RS)]



                                                       Calendar No. 142
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 698

                          [Report No. 106-71]

 To review the suitability and feasibility of recovering costs of high 
 altitude rescues at Denali National Park and Preserve in the State of 
                    Alaska, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 1999

 Mr. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                              June 9, 1999

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To review the suitability and feasibility of recovering costs of high 
 altitude rescues at Denali National Park and Preserve in the State of 
                    Alaska, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That no later than nine 
months after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
(hereinafter referred to as the ``Secretary'') shall complete a report 
on the suitability and feasibility of recovering the costs of high 
altitude rescues on Mt. McKinley, within Denali National Park and 
Preserve. The Secretary shall also report on the suitability and 
feasibility of requiring climbers to provide proof of medical insurance 
prior to the issuance of a climbing permit by the National Park 
Service. The report shall also review the amount of fees charged for a 
climbing permit and make such recommendations for changing the fee 
structure as the Secretary deems appropriate. Upon completion, the 
report shall be submitted to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate, and the Committee on Resources of the House of 
Representatives.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 142

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 698

                          [Report No. 106-71]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To review the suitability and feasibility of recovering costs of high 
 altitude rescues at Denali National Park and Preserve in the State of 
                    Alaska, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 9, 1999

                       Reported without amendment`
#### THE STATE *v.*CHARLES NEWBY.

.A special verdict in an indictment for Malicious mischief, which omits to find that the act was done *with malice towards the owner*of the property injured, is equivalent to an acquittal.

*(State*v. *Jackson,*12 Ire., 329, *State*v. *Latham,*13 He., 33, cited and approved.)

Malicious Misohiee, tried before Pool, *J.,*at Spring Term 1869, of Perquimans Court.

A special verdict found that the *ox*in question, was killed by the defendant in December 1866, in a field belonging to the defendant, within which no crop was growing; that the cattle of the plaintiff were frequently in such field, and plaintiff had been previously notified by the defendant of .that fact; that the fence was not a *lawful*one ; that the de*24fendant fired upon the ox from the door of his own house,, and as soon as he saw it; and that after killing it he sent word to its owner, the prosecutor.

In regard to the point of *malice,*the solicitor submitted to the Court that, as the killing was in the winter, when there was no crop upon the ground, the law implied malice.

His Honor, however, directed a verdict of Not guilty to-, be entered, and the Solicitor appealed.

*Attorney-general,*for the State.

Absence of a reasonable influential and apparent motive, at the time, implies malice. The principle governing cases of homicide without legal justification, seems applicable. See *State*v. *Landreth,*2nd Law Eepos. 446 ; *State*v. *Robinson,*3 D. & B., 130.

*F. II. Busbee, contra.*

The ruling below is correct. 4 Bl. Coin. 343 ; *State*v. *Robinson,*3 D & B., 130 ,- Wheaton’s Cr. Law, § 2011; *State*v. *Latham,*13 Ire. 33 ; *Kirlvpatrick*v. *The People,*5 Denio, 277 ; *State*v. *Jackson,*12 Ire., 329.

Eeade, J.

In the spoliation or destruction of property, malice towards the owner, must be the inducement, in order to constitute the crime of malicious mischief at common law.

This was not controverted by the Attorney-general, but he insisted that the fact of killing the ox being found, malice must be inferred, just as in homicide. The difference is that homicide is a crime *per se,*and excuse or justification must, come from the defence, or appear in the cause *;*but to kill an ox is not so; and therefore malice toward the owner-must be found. It was not found in this case, and therefore-*25the defendant was entitled to an acquittal. *State*v. *Jackson, 12*Ire., 329; *State*v. Latham, 13 Ire., 33.

There is no error. Let this he certified.

Per Curiam. No error.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CRAIG REED,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 556 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of March, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

, due to Petitioner’s failure to demonstrate by reference to the record that he

was sentenced pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S . § 9712.1 as alleged, without prejudice to

Petitioner’s rights, if any, under the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541 et

seq.

.
**Exhibit 10.18**

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY 

 

Our directors who are not employed by USA Risk Group (Bermuda), Ltd., the management company, receive an annual retainer of $15,000. They are also paid$700 per half day for each board meeting and $175 per hour for each committee meeting attended during the calendar year. All of our officer positions are filled by directors without any salary or other compensation. Directors are entitled to receivereimbursement for expenses incurred in attending board or committee meetings or when otherwise acting on our behalf. The chairman of the board, as well as the chairman of each committee, excluding nominating, receives an annual retainer of $5,000each.
**Exhibit 31.1**

I, George R. Chapdelaine, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q ofBoston Restaurant Associates, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements and other financial information included in this report,  fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a)       Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)       [omitted] 

(c)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report; and

(d)       Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

(a)       All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 
| Date:  September 1, 2006 |   | /s/ George R. Chapdelaine            |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | George R. Chapdelaine, President and |
|                          |   | Chief Executive Officer              |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; Conflicted R01s and Multiple Programs.                    

*Date:*                         March 27, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ali Sharma, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, NIH, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 500, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968,                         *ali.sharma@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 28, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-25384 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000926283
<NAME> JAMES CABLE FINANCE CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,386,344
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,513,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,879
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,886,619
<PP&E>                                     101,609,168
<DEPRECIATION>                              75,802,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,076,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,035,433
<BONDS>                                    104,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (62,958,846)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,076,587
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,343,884
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,722,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,162
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,395,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,776,030)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,776,030)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,776,030)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection with the Annual Report of TELE LESTE CELULAR PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arcádio Luis Martínez García, Executive Vice President for Finance, Planning and Control and Investors Relations Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   |   | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Date April 15, 2005

| By:    | /s/ Arcádio        Luis Martínez García |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                              |
|   | Name:                                                        | Arcádio Luis Martínez        García |
|   | Title:                                                       | Executive Vice President for Finance, Planning and Control and Investor Relations Officer |

 

----
EXIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sector 10, Inc.; on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Pericles DeAvila, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








By: /s/ Pericles DeAvila





Name: Pericles DeAvila


Principal Executive Officer





August 20, 2012
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 760

To include the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,

Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, and the

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in the 50 States Commemorative Coin Program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking,

Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To include the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of

Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the United States

Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern

Mariana Islands in the 50 States Commemorative Coin

Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commemorative Coin

5 Amendments Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 760 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO COIN PROGRAM.

2 Section 5112(l) of title 31, United States Code, is

3 amended by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(8) INCLUSION OF NON-STATES.—

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—During the 1-year pe6 riod beginning at the end of the period de7 scribed in paragraph (1)(A), quarter dollar

8 coins shall be minted and issued having designs

9 on the reverse side that are emblematic of each

10 of the 6 non-States.

11 ‘‘(B) APPLICABILITY.—The requirements

12 of paragraphs (2) through (6) shall apply to

13 coins issued in commemoration of the non14 States, except that, for purposes of this

15 paragraph—

16 ‘‘(i) references in those paragraphs to

17 ‘States’ and ‘the 50 States’ shall be con18 strued to be references to the 6 non-States;

19 ‘‘(ii) references in these paragraphs to

20 the ‘10-year period’ shall be construed to

21 be references to the 1-year period de22 scribed in subparagraph (A) of this para23 graph; and

24 ‘‘(iii) references in those paragraphs

25 to the ‘50 designs’ shall be construed to be
3

•S 760 IS

1 references to the 6 designs relating to the

2 non-States.

3 ‘‘(C) ORDER.—Coins shall be minted and

4 issued for non-States in the order in which they

5 appear in subparagraph (D).

6 ‘‘(D) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the

7 term ‘non-States’ means—

8 ‘‘(i) the District of Columbia;

9 ‘‘(ii) the Commonwealth of Puerto

10 Rico;

11 ‘‘(iii) Guam;

12 ‘‘(iv) American Samoa;

13 ‘‘(v) the United States Virgin Islands;

14 and

15 ‘‘(vi) the Commonwealth of the North16 ern Mariana Islands.’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 10, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-10337

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER SHAUN MCDONALD, also known as

Chris McDonald,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CR-293-ALL-A

--------------------

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Christopher Shaun McDonald pleaded guilty pursuant to a

written plea agreement to wire fraud, and he was sentenced to

nine months’ imprisonment, three years’ supervised release, a

special assessment of $100, and restitution in the amount of

$18,846.65. 

On appeal, McDonald argues that the district court erred

when it failed to consider his ability to pay when scheduling his

immediate payment of restitution. McDonald also asserts that the
No. 04-10337

-2-

court was not authorized to order the immediate payment of

restitution as a condition of supervised release under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583 because his term of supervised release had not yet

commenced. However, the district court considered McDonald’s

assets, earnings, and financial obligations when it scheduled the

payment of restitution, and McDonald has not shown any error in

the court’s restitution order. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664(f)(2);

United States v. Howard, 220 F.3d 645, 647 (5th Cir. 2000);

United States v. Myers, 198 F.3d 160, 169 (5th Cir. 1999). 

McDonald also argues that the district court erred in

ordering that he pay restitution to one victim for expenses

related to his nonmandatory attendance as an observer at court

proceedings. The Mandatory Victims Restitution Act requires a

defendant to “reimburse the victim for lost income and necessary

child care, transportation, and other expenses incurred during

participation in the investigation or prosecution of the offense

or attendance at proceedings related to the offense.” 18 U.S.C.

§ 3663A(b)(4). Under the plain language of the statute, the

district court did not err in awarding restitution for the

victim’s court attendance. See United States v. MoralesPalacios, 369 F.3d 442, 446 (5th Cir. 2004); see also United

States v. Malpeso, 126 F.3d 92, 94-95 (2d Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 857 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 857

To amend the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986 
                      to cover Federal facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 22, 1999

 Mr. Coverdell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986 
                      to cover Federal facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Facilities Community Right-
To-Know Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF FEDERAL FACILITIES UNDER THE EMERGENCY PLANNING AND 
              COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT OF 1986.

    Section 329(7) of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-
Know Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 11049(7)) is amended by inserting ``or the 
United States'' before the period at the end.
                                 <all>
```