alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2237]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  HONORING THE LIFE AND SERVICE OF U.S. NAVY PETTY OFFICER MATTHEW J. 
                                O'BRYANT

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. JO BONNER

                               of alabama

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, October 3, 2008

  Mr. BONNER. Madam Speaker, I rise today with a heavy heart to 
remember the life and courageous service of United States Navy Petty 
Officer Third Class Matthew J. O'Byrant.
  Petty Officer O'Byrant was killed in a terrorist attack at the 
Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan, a cowardly act that claimed the 
lives of 53 people including two members of our country's armed forces. 
Matthew was serving in support of Operation Enduring Freedom from 
Islamabad.
  A native of Theodore, AL, Matthew O'Bryant excelled in the ROTC 
program at Theodore High School and was assigned to Navy Information 
Operations Command at Fort Meade, MD, as a cryptologic technician.
  As a cryptologic technician, Petty Officer O'Bryant was in charge of 
maintaining the advanced communications and technological equipment so 
vital to America's success in 21st century warfare.
  Petty Officer O'Bryant's brother, along with two of his cousins, had 
enlisted to serve in the Navy. Coming from a Navy family, Petty Officer 
O'Bryant was deployed to Pakistan for only 30 days before the blast 
that took his life. At his funeral, Matthew's brother, Lawrence, 
remembered him by saying, ``There were four of us in the Navy. Well, 
there's three of us now. I guess there will always be four of us 
because he will always be in the Navy.''
  Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to take a moment to reflect upon 
the many things that have helped to make this the greatest country on 
the face of the planet. And to that end, we must acknowledge that 
soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines like Petty Officer O'Bryant 
deserve the highest praise for their unselfish service and, in this 
particular case, for their willingness to make the ultimate sacrifice.
  Madam Speaker, I hope you and my colleagues will join me in paying 
tribute to Petty Officer Matthew O'Bryant. We should also remember his 
wife, Bridgett O'Bryant; his parents, Barbara and Tommy O'Bryant; his 
two sisters, Janet O'Bryant and Nancy O'Bryant; his brother, Lawrence 
O'Bryant; and his other relatives and many friends.
  Our prayer is that God will give them all the strength and courage 
that only He can provide to sustain them during the difficult days 
ahead.
  May Matthew rest in peace. He was without question a true American 
hero.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 99.7  Rule 13a-14(b) Certification CFO  In connection with the annual report of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Smith, the Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Toronto,   CanadaMarch 25,   2015/s/   David SmithDavid   SmithSenior   Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Electric City Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for
the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Mitola, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: June 13, 2005 /s/ John P. MitolaJohn P. MitolaChief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Electric City Corp. and will be retained by Electric City Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 13.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Enacted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Cream Minerals Ltd. (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 (the “Report”).





I, Angela Yap, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Angela YapAngela YapChief Financial Officer








July 8, 2013
### NUMBER 13

- 24

- 00 332

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

HERITAGE CONSTRUCTION CO. , LLC

, Appellant,

v.

MARY WYNELLE PETTY, BY AND

THROUGH TERESA LYNN WOODRUM,

INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE

ESTATE OF MARY WYNELLE PETTY

, Appellee.

O N APPEAL FROM THE 343RD DISTRICT COURT

OF SAN PATRICIO COUNTY, TEXAS



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal. Appellant

no longer wishes to pursue this appeal and asks that costs be assessed against the party

incurring them.2 The Court, having considered appellant’s motion, is of the opinion that the motion

should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, appellant’s motion to

dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed against the

party incurring the same. See id. R. 42.1(d). Because the appeal is dismissed at

appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

15th day of August, 2024.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stuart Grayston, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    STUART GRAYSTON                                 
|Stuart Grayston President (Principal Executive Officer)



March 31, 2009
#### Kroll, Appellant, vs. Zywicki and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Harold W. Krueger*of Oconto.

For the respondents : *Arlo McKinnon*and *Robert E.*Tehan, both of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                               ALEXANDER'S, INC.
 
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
 
Alexander's of Brooklyn, Inc.
Alexander's of Fordham Road, Inc.
Alexander's of Rego Park, Inc.
Alexander's of Rego Park II, Inc.
Alexander's of Rego Park III, Inc.
Alexander's of Third Avenue, Inc.
Alexander's of Flushing, Inc.
Alexander's Department Stores of New Jersey, Inc.
Alexander's Department Stores of Lexington Avenue, Inc.
Alexander's Department Stores of Brooklyn, Inc.
U & F Realty Corp.
ADMO Realty Corp.
Ownreal Inc.
Sakraf Wine & Liquor Store, Inc.
Alexander's Department Stores of Valley Stream, Inc.
Alexander's Department Stores of Yonkers, Inc.
Alexander's Department Stores of Bruckner Boulevard, Inc.
A.D.S. Bruckner Operating Corporation
Browning Avenue Realty Corp.
ALS Liquors
Alexander's Department Stores of Roosevelt Field, Inc.
Alexander's Department Stores of Menlo Park, Inc.
SKO Realty Corp.
Narrow Corp.
Queens Plaza Shopping Center, Inc.
Harvey Weston Associates, Inc.
Ideal Hanging Corp.
Alexander's Department Stores Fur Vault, Inc.
ZARCO Trading Corp.
Alexander's Department Stores of Florida, Inc.
 
                                       60
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 99

                                                                   NEWS RELEASE

                  [THE SIRENA APPAREL GROUP, INC. LETTERHEAD]


                                           Contact:  Douglas Arbetman
                                                     President and CEO
          
                                                     Henry R. Mandell
                                                     Executive Vice President &
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     (818) 442-6680

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                                                     James K. White
                                                     Kehoe, White, Savage & Co.
                                                     (310) 437-0655


                LIZ CLAIBORNE, INC. REACHES AGREEMENT TO LICENSE
                     SWIMWEAR WITH THE SIRENA APPAREL GROUP

        LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, NOVEMBER 20, 1996--Liz Claiborne, Inc. (NYSE:
LIZ) announced today that it has reached an agreement in principle with The
Sirena Apparel Group (NASDAQ: SIRENA) to license a new swimwear business, under
the Company's Liz Claiborne and Elisabeth labels.  The Cruise '98 collections
will be launched to the trade at the June, 1997 market.

        Paul R. Charron, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Liz Claiborne,
Inc. said "We are very excited to be entering this category with The Sirena
Apparel Group.  Both of our companies are dedicated to quality product and
to exciting marketing initiatives.  Together we will make a real difference in
missy and large-size fashion swimwear."

        "We are pleased to be working with one of the most important names in
women's apparel," added Douglas Arbetman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of The Sirena Apparel Group.  "Liz Claiborne and Elisabeth Swimwear will make
the consumer's shopping experience in this category a more rewarding one.  Both
our retail partners and consumers will benefit from the combination of Liz
Claiborne's focus on design innovation, fit and quality, and The Sirena Apparel
Group's swimwear and merchandising expertise."

                                    - more -
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Raffael Rotholz, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County,

November 15, 1937.

*915
      *Pollock & Nemerov [Maurice J. Dix*and *Solomon Herman*of counsel], for the proponent.

*David Marshall Holtzmann,*for Max Jonas, legatee.

*Noah L. Braunsteiii,*special guardian.

Henderson, S.

The paper offered for probate is a holographic will which was executed in Palestine in accordance with German law by the decedent, who died in New York.

The proponent Urges that it is entitled to probate pursuant to section 23 of the New York Decedent Estate Law, which provides:

“ § 23. What wills may be proved, A will of real or personal property, executed as prescribed by the laws of the State, or a will of real or personal property executed without the State in the mode prescribed by the law, either of the place where executed or of the testator’s domicile, provided such will is in writing and subscribed by the testator* may be admitted to probate in this State.”

Its admissibility depends on whether or not the decedent’s domicile was in Germany at the time of his death.

The decedent had been a practicing physician in Berlin for many years, Living conditions in Germany became distasteful to him, and he decided to leave permanently and to make his future home in the United States. Prior to this he had visited Palestine, and Upon his return had stated that he did not desire to make his home there. Owing to governmental restrictions he was unable to get his money out of Germany except by subterfuge. He purchased cattle which he shipped to Palestine. It was his stated plan to collect what he could from the sale of the cattle and then to come to the United States. He proceeded to Palestine, where he executed the propounded instrument. Later he sailed to the United States, where he resided until his death.

A person may have but one domicile, though he may have a number of residences. Living in a particular locality is sufficient for becoming a resident of it, but to become domiciled in a particular place there must be the actual presence coupled with an intention to make it the permanent home, Once á domicile has been established it continues until a new one is acquired, *(Matter of Newcomb,*192 N. Y. 238, 250.)

This decedent was not domiciled in Palestine because while he resided there he had no intention to make that country his permanent home, He was not domiciled in the United States at *916the time of the execution of the paper because intention must be coupled with residence.

Germany remained the decedent’s domicile until he acquired the new one in the United States, which was after the execution of the will.

Probate will be decreed. Proceed accordingly.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT (32)

                              THE BANC CORPORATION

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of The Banc
Corporation (the "Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 16, 2005                       /s/ C. Stanley Bailey
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                C. Stanley Bailey
                                             Chief Executive Officer


      This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
<PAGE>
                              THE BANC CORPORATION

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of The Banc
Corporation (the "Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 16, 2005                        /s/ David R. Carter
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                David R. Carter
                                             Chief Financial Officer


      This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
<PAGE>

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus incorporated by reference in
this Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the registration statement (Form N-4
No. 333-20343) (the "Registration Statement") of our report dated February
15, 2001, relating to the financial statements of First Fortis Life Insurance
Company, which appears in such Prospectus. We also consent to the use in the
Statement of Additional Information incorporated by reference in this
Registration Statement of our report dated April 6, 2001, relating to the
financial statements of First Fortis Life Insurance Company Variable Account
A, which appears in such Statement of Additional Information. We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Statement of
Additional Information.

/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 25, 2001
1

Supplementary Data

S1. Sensitivity c oefficients for the cerebellum, pituitary, and olfactory bulb in monkeys and

humans.

Table S1.1 : Sensitivity analysis of peak Mn concen tration in the cerebellum of monkeys

and humans at inhalation exposure concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 mg/m 3

. Normalized

s ensitivity parameters reflect a 1% change in model parameters.

Model

Parameter Sensitivity Coefficient

Monkey Human

0.01 0.1 1.0 0.01 0.1 1.0

Fdietup 0.67 0.17 0.09 0.59 0.25 0.00

kbile

- 0.44

- 0.51

- 0.35

- 0.29

- 0.25

- 0.32

Q tissue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

B

max 0.67 0.51 0.44 0.88 0.75 0.48

k

a 0.44 0.17 0.09 0.29 0.00 0.00

k d

- 0.22

- 0.17

- 0.09 0.00

- 0.25

- 0.16

k in 0.89 0.69 0.79 0.59 0.50 0.48

k

out - 0.67

- 0.69

- 0.61

- 0.29

- 0.50

- 0.48

FdepLU 0.22 0.00 0.26 0.29 0.00 0.16

FdepNO 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.29 0.00 0.00

FdepNR 0.22 0.00 0.18 0.29 0.00 0.00

k GI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

F

ent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

k

ent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002

Table S1.2 : Sensitivity analysis of peak Mn concen tration in the pituitary of monkeys and

humans at inhalation exposure concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 mg/m 3

. Normalized

s ensitivity parameters reflect a 1% change in model parameters.

Model

Parameter Sensitivity Coefficient

Monkey Human

0.01 0.1 1.0 0.01 0.1 1.0

Fdietup 1.29 0.56 0.06 0.62 0.31 0.08

kbile

- 1.50

- 1.01

- 0.60

- 0.83

- 0.46

- 0.33

Q tissue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

B

max 0.54 0.51 0.26 0.62 0.77 0.49

k

a 0.43 0.28 0.06 0.21 0.15 0.08

k d

- 0.43

- 0.28

- 0.05

- 0.41

- 0.15 0.00

k in 1.72 1.57 1.08 0.62 0.62 0.66

k

out - 1.83

- 1.57

- 0.97

- 0.83

- 0.62

- 0.66

k inmax 1.07 1.24 0.95 0.41 0.46 0.49

k in50

- 0.97

- 0.84

- 0.27

- 0.41

- 0.15

- 0.08

FdepLU 0.00 0.22 0.39 0.00 0.15 0.25

FdepNO 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00

FdepNR 0.00 0.17 0.26 0.00 0.15 0.16

k GI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

F

ent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

k

ent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003

Table S1.3 : Sensitivity analysis of peak Mn concen tration in the olfactory bulb of monkeys

and humans at inhalation exposure concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 mg/m 3

. Normalized

s ensitivity parameters reflect a 1% change in model parameters.

Model

Parameter Sensitivity Coefficient

Monkey Human

0.01 0.1 1.0 0.01 0.1 1.0

Fdietup 0.57 0.16 0.00 0.29 0.11 0.05

kbile

- 0.57

- 0.31

- 0.17

- 0.29

- 0.22

- 0.14

Q tissue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

B

max 0.57 0.47 0.21 0.86 0.67 0.27

k

a 0.29 0.31 0.04 0.14 0.00 0.00

k d

- 0.57

- 0.31

- 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00

k in 0.86 0.47 0.30 0.29 0.22 0.32

k

out - 0.86

- 0.78

- 0.82

- 0.29

- 0.44

- 0.72

FdepLU 0.00 0.16 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.14

FdepNO 0.00 0.31 0.47 0.00 0.11 0.45

FdepNR 0.00 0.16 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.05

k GI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

F

ent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

k

ent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mitcham Industries, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting./s/ Billy F. Mitcham, Jr.