alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2263]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         HONORING LEE ANGELICH

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. JIM COSTA

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. COSTA. Madam Speaker, I rise today along with Congressman 
Radanovich to congratulate Lee Angelich upon his induction into the 
Fresno Hall of Fame. Mr. Angelich will be honored at the 50th 
anniversary enshrinement dinner of the Fresno Athletic Hall of Fame on 
Thursday, November 6, 2008.
  Lee Angelich, the youngest of five boys, was born to a Serbian 
immigrant family and starred in track and field in high school and 
college. Mr. Angelich qualified for the State Finals his senior year at 
Shasta High School. In his two years at Sacramento Junior College, he 
led the Panthers to league and state titles and in 1941 he led them to 
a national title. Mr. Angelich placed second in the 120 high hurdles 
and fifth in the high jump at the national meet. He then went on to the 
University of California, where in 1943 he won Pacific Coast Conference 
titles in the 120 high and the 220 low hurdles, and finished fifth and 
sixth respectively in the same events at the NCAA Championships. In 
1943, Mr. Angelich joined the Navy and served as an officer on the 
U.S.S. Rixey in the Pacific. After the war, he enrolled at California 
State University Fresno and placed third in the West Coast Relays in 
the 120 high hurdles.
  After completing his education Mr. Angelich began coaching. As a 
coach he stressed fundamentals, defense and teamwork. He guided boys' 
teams at Kerman High, Porterville High and Fresno High to eight league 
championships and an overall record of 255-76 from 1947 to 1963. His 
Kerman team won the Central Section small schools championship, and his 
Fresno High teams won forty-eight straight games at home, second best 
in section history. Under Mr. Angelich, Fresno High won four 
consecutive North Yosemite League titles (1957-1960). He is one of the 
rare coaches to win central Section titles in two different sports, as 
Fresno High captured the boys' track-and-field championship in 1957. He 
became one of the winningest high school basketball coaches in central 
section history. Additionally, after turning down a chance to coach 
Greece's national men's basketball team in 1959, he organized and 
coached the Libyan national team that participated in the North African 
Games in 1961.
  Madam Speaker, we rise today to commend and congratulate Lee Angelich 
upon his achievements and induction into the Fresno Athletic Hall of 
Fame. I invite my colleagues to join me in wishing Mr. Angelich 
congratulations on his many accomplishments.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10686]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        PROVIDING FOR AN ADJOURNMENT OR RECESS OF THE TWO HOUSES

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair lays before the House a privileged 
message from the Senate.
  The Clerk read as follows:

       In the Senate of the United States, October 2 (legislative 
     day, September 17), 2008.
       Resolved, That the resolution from the House of 
     Representatives (H. Con. Res. 440) entitled ``Concurrent 
     resolution providing for a conditional adjournment of the 
     House of Representatives and a conditional recess or 
     adjournment of the Senate.'', do pass with the following 
     amendments:
       1. On page 1, line 3, strike ``from Monday, September 29, 
     2008, through Friday, October 3, 2008,''
       2. On page 2, line 2, strike ``that'' and all that follows 
     through line 9 and insert ``the Senate may adjourn or recess 
     at any time from Thursday, October 2, 2008, through January 
     3, 2009, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
     resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee until such 
     time as specified in that motion, but not beyond noon on 
     January 3, 2009, and it may reassemble pursuant to section 2 
     of this concurrent resolution.''
       3. On page 2, line 15, strike ``time'' and insert 
     ''respective time''

  The Senate amendments were agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________
```
[No. 24956.

Department One.

June 12, 1934.]

#### Nick Ray, *Respondent,*v. The Department of Labor and Industries, *Appellant.**1*

*The Attorney General*and *Browder Brown, Assistant,*for appellant.

*L. B. Donley,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 33 P. (2d) 375.

Main, J. —

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court reversing a order of the department of labor and industries closing the claim of Nick Ray.

February 13, 1933, Ray was injured in the region of the right hip, while engaged as a timber faller, which was an extrahazardous occupation. He presented a claim to the department, which was allowed, and he was paid time loss from February 19, 1933, to May 10, 1933, on which latter date the claim was closed. An appeal was taken to the joint board, and evidence was taken before an examiner, which was transcribed and submitted to the board, which sustained the order of the department closing the claim. From the order of the joint board, the claimant appealed to the Su*688perior court, where the case was heard upon the record made by the department, including the testimony taken before the examiner, and no other evidence was taken. The trial court reversed the order of the joint board, and the department appealed from that order.

There is but one question presented upon the appeal, and that is, whether Ray’s disability was due to the injury or a pre-existing arthritic condition, and this is purely a question of fact. The evidence shows that, at the time he sustained the injury, he had an arthritic condition which was dormant or latent, and that the injury caused tin's to become lighted up and made active. Since the injury, he has been unable to work, and whether he will sustain a permanent partial or a permanent total disability could not be determined at the time the evidence was taken, because the condition had not become fixed.

The judgment of the trial court was that the claimant was entitled to time loss until such time as it could be determined whether he sustained a permanent partial or a permanent total disability. The fact that the claimant, at the time of the injury, had an arthritic condition which was dormant and inactive, would not justify the refusal of compensation. If that condition was lighted up and made active by the injury, then the condition was the result of the injury, and not of the previous arthritic condition. *Matela v. Department of Labor & Industries,*174 Wash. 144, 24 P. (2d) 429; *Hadley v. Department of Labor & Industries,*174 Wash. 582, 25 P. (2d) 1031; *Anderson v. Department of Labor & Industries,*174 Wash. 702, 26 P. (2d) 77.

The trial court expressly found, after considering all the evidence, that the claimant’s condition was caused by the injury, and that, at the time of the closing of the claim, the condition of the claimant had not become fixed, and was not fixed at the time of the hear*689ing. After considering all the evidence, we are of the view that it decisively supports the finding of the trial court.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Blake, Mitchell, Millard, and Steinert, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

# **Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)**

** **

     Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), theundersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

     The Annual Report onForm 10-K for year ended December 31, 2010**(the “Report”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

** **

|              |   |   |
|-------------------|--------|--------|
| February 22, 2011 |   |   | /s/ Steven Roth |
|              |   | Name:  | Steven Roth |
|              |   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |
|              |   |   |   |   |

 

----
#### CHARLES DEWEY, Cashier v. STEPHEN F. BURBANK.

*Purchase by Minor*— Election *to*Confirm.

Where a minor purchased land and after he came of age continued to live on it and paid a portion of the purchase money ; *Held,*to he an elections to confirm the contract of purchase.

Civil ActioN, tried at Spring Term, 1877, of Beaufort Superior Court, before *Eure, J.*

The plaintiff instituted this action against the defendant to recover the amount due upon certain notes given for th& purchase money of a tract of land in Beaufort County, and *260to obtain a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage deed executed by tbe defendant to secure the payment of said notes. The defendant; in his answer, alleged that at the time of the execution of the notes he was under the age of twenty-one jears. The plaintiff, in his reply, insisted that the defend..ant had ratified.the contract of purchase by taking posses•sion of, and residing and farming on tbe land conveyed in "the mortgage ; and that he further ratified the contract by paying a part of said indebtedness after he arrived at the .age of twenty-one years. It was admitted that the defendant was in possession of the land, and that he made the payments as alleged. His Honor gave judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed.

*Mr. D. M. Carter,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Geo. H. Brown, Jr.,*and *Jno. A. Moore,*for defendants.

PeaesoN, C. J.

A minor who makes a contract has his election after arriving at the age of twenty-one years, either to avoid or to confirm the contract.

The fact that the purchaser of land continues to live on it and cultivate it after he arrives at age, together with the fact that he pays a part of the purchase money, amounts to an election to confirm the contract.

No error.

Pee, Cuexam. Judgment affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1642

ROBERT J. MORGAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. BRITTANY WOODS HOMEOWNER’S ASSOCIATION, INC.; TALIS MANAGEMENT, LLC , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III, District Judge. ( 5:18

- cv
- 00291

- D )

Submitted : September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robert J. Morgan , Appellant Pro Se. Philip Alan Collins , BAILEY & DIXON , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees

.
Unpublished opinions are not bin ding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert J. Morgan seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings in his civil action . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice o f appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “ [T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 14, 2019 . The notice of appeal was filed on June 14, 20 19, one day late

. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(1). Because Morgan failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### REUBEN HALL AND WIFE *vs.*CHANG AND ENG BUNKER, *the Siamese Twins.*

A deed, made by husband and wife *to*one who dies previously to the probate and privy examination of the wife, is good from the time of its execution and delivery to the bargainee, provided, after his death, it is duly acknowledged, and the privy examination of the wife taken, and the deed registered.

PetxtioN for Dower, tried before his Honor, Judge Manly, at the Fall Term, 1854, of Wilkes Superior Court.

The only question in this case was, as to the effect of a deed made in the life-time of the husband of the petitioner, by a *feme covert*(with her husband) but not acknowledged and re*441gistered until after tlie death of the bargainee. His Honor was of opinion that it took effect from its delivery, and, therefore, that he was seized, at his death, so as to entitle his widow to dower, and gave judgment accordingly, from which defendants appealed.

*Boyden,*for plaintiffs.

*Mitchell,*for defendants.

Nash, O. J.

David Tates was the owner of several tracts of land, of which, one was the tract now in controversy in this suit. By their plea, the defendants admit that David Yates died seized and possessed of the other tracts, but deny he did die so seized and possessed of the one now in controversy. David Tates, by deed, conveyed the land in question to his daughter Jerusha Tates, wife of Robert Yates, and by a deed of conveyance, bearing date the 3rd of June, 1848, Robert Tates and his wife Jerusha, re-conveyed the land to David Tates. The privy examination of Jerusha Tates was informally taken by the County Court, before the death of David Tates, and subsequent to his death, her privy examination was duly taken before his Honor Judge Settle. On the part of the defendants, it was insisted that the last examination took effect, only from the time it was had, and could not refer back to the date of the deed of re-conveyance. It was proved that David Tates died in possession of the land in question.

In support of their position, the case of a Sheriff’s deed, made upon the sale of land under execution, was cited, as having no relation back. The difference is obvious. The claim of a purchaser.at a Sheriff’s sale, is under the deed of the officer, which has no validity until its delivery. Here the deed was made some years anterior to the privy examination of the feme covert. The privy examination is evidence only of the wife’s previous act, and was necessary under the law to its due registration: when taken, it validates the conveyance, and completes the title of the person to whom made, who has the legal title, not under the privy examination, .but under *442the deed. The efficacy of the deed, therefore, relates back to the time when it was executed and delivered. Half the deeds of conveyance of land, made in this country, are proved years after their execution; it has never been doubted but that, when so proved and registered as directed by law, they relate back to the time when executed. Nor does the statute requiring a privy examination limit any time within which it may be taken.

Pee Cukxam. There is no error in the judgment below, which is affirmed.
Matthew Rodriquez Secretary for Environmental Protection September 5 , 2014 Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator Region 9 

# Air Resources Board Mary D. Nichols, Chairman

1001 I Street • P . O . Box 2815 Sac ramento , California 9581 2 • www . arb . ca . gov

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco , California 94105 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld : Edmund G . Brown Jr. Governor

Enclosed is a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) . This revision consists of South Coast Air Quality Management District (District) Rule 2449, Control of Oxides ofNitrogen Emissions from Off-Road Diesel Vehicles . Rule 2449 was amended by the District on July 11 , 2014 . Also enclosed is the Air Resources Board (ARB) Executive Order S-14-012 adopting the District's rule as a revision to the SIP . To meet the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency criteria for determining that rule submittals a re administratively and technically complete, we have enclosed a SIP submittal checklist. We have also enclosed an evaluation of the effects of the rule on emissions, evaluation of the rule ' s consistency with 40 CFR 51 , and other supporting documentation provided to us by the District. Two compact discs and two paper copies , each containing the revision , are enclosed . If you have any questions, please have your staff contact Ms . Carol Sutkus, Manager, South Coast Air Quality Planning Section , at (916) 322-1229 or by email at csutkus@arb.ca .gov . Sincerely ,

Enclosure(s) cc: See next page.

T he en ergy cha ll enge facing California is real. Ev ery Californian n eed s t

o take immed iate action t o re duce energy cons u mp t io

n . F

or a li st of s impl e wa ys you can reduce dema nd and c ut yo ur energy costs, see our websit e: http :/lwww.arb . ca .gov . California Envi ronmental Protect ion Agency Printed on Recycled PaperMr . Jared Blumenfeld September 5, 2014 Page 2
cc: Dr . Barry Wallerstein Executive Officer South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar , California 91765-4182 Ms . Carol Sutkus, Manager South Coast Air Quality Planning Section Air Quality Planning and Science DivisionMr. Jared Blumenfeld September 5, 2014 Page 3 bee: Aron Livingston, OLA Pam Biggins, ASD (1 05 Grant Conditions) Kurt Karperos, AQPS Karen Magliano, AQPS Sylvia Vanderspek, AQPS Monica Lewis, AQPS Austin Hicks, AQPS Mr . Andy Steckel, Chief Rulemaking Office (Air-4) Region 9 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 95105 Mr. John Ungvarsky Planning Office (Air-2) Region 9 U.S . Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco , California 95105 Mr . Kenneth Koyama Executive Director California Air Pollution Control Officers Association 1107 Ninth Street, Suite 210 Sacramento, California 95814 EO Chron (with Enclosures) AQPS Chron (with Enclosures) SIP Library (with Enclosures) Assignment: AQPS #9263/ ARB #18712 Y :\Compl eted SIPs\CARB SIP 2014 - 09-dd South Coast Expedited\Cover Letter .doc Enclosure : Y :\Completed SIPs\CARB SIP 2014-09 -dd South Coast Expedited\Executive Order S-14-012 .doc
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               | /s/ Dwight V. Neese                   |   |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|               | Dwight V. Neese                       |   |
|               | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|               |                                  |   |
|               |                                  |   |
| Date: May 10, 2011 |                                  |   |
Los derrumbes de zanjas pueden ser mortales 

Los riesgos de las zanjas son bien conocidos, pero demasiados trabajadores siguen resultando heridos 

o muertos durante los trabajos de excavación. Los derrumbes de zanjas, o derrumbamientos, tienen

más probabilidades que otros incidentes relacionados con la excavación de provocar la muerte de los

trabajadores. Sólo se necesitan unos segundos para quedar enterrado en miles de kilos de tierra.

Los peligros de las zanjas pueden controlarse cuando los empleadores actúan con responsabilidad, 

capacitan a los empleados y siguen las normas federales. Estos importantes pasos pueden mantener la 

seguridad en los trabajos de excavación:

• Asegúrese de que hay una forma segura de entrar y salir

de la zanja

• Las zanjas deben estar protegidas contra derrumbes -

recuerde incline, apuntale, proteja

• Mantenga los materiales alejados del borde de la zanja

• Busque agua estancada u otros riesgos ambientales, y

• Nunca entre en una zanja si no está debidamente

inspeccionada

OSHA quiere ayudar

Para obtener ayuda, los empleadores pueden ponerse en contacto con su oficina local de OSHA o con 

el Programa de Consulta en el Lugar de Trabajo.

Anuncio de servicio público sobre 

la seguridad en las zanjas 

• osha.gov • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

Las alertas de noticias de OSHA se publican periódicamente para llamar la atención 

sobre los problemas de seguridad y salud de los trabajadores y sus soluciones.

OSHA 4184-06 2022 | Trench collapses can be deadly (Spanish)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2280]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         HONORING STEPHEN BAKER

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. JIM COSTA

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. COSTA. Madam Speaker, I rise today along with Congressman 
Radanovich to congratulate Stephen Baker upon his induction into the 
Fresno Athletic Hall of Fame. Mr. Baker will be honored at the 50th 
anniversary enshrinement dinner of the Fresno Athletic Hall of Fame on 
Thursday, November 6, 2008.
  A sportswriter once said that Stephen Baker, at 5-foot-8, 160 pounds, 
was built more for gymnastics than for football. But with his lightning 
quickness, sure hands and gritty toughness, the wide receiver earned 
one of the game's enduring nicknames--``the touchdown maker.'' He was 
given the catchy moniker at West Los Angeles College, where he scored 
31 touchdowns in two seasons, before starring at California State 
University Fresno for two seasons and playing six seasons with the New 
York Giants (1987-1992). With the Bulldogs, he was a frequent target of 
NCAA record-setting quarterback Kevin Sweeney, burning opponents for 
sixty-two receptions, an amazing 26.3 yards per catch and sixteen 
touchdowns over two seasons. He closed his collegiate career by 
catching a thirty-six yard scoring pass that gave the West All-Stars a 
victory in the Japan Bowl.
  Drafted in the third round by the New York Giants, Mr. Baker earned 
the respect of Coach Bill Parcels with his ability to elude defenders 
and hang onto the ball. Over the course of his NFL career, he lost just 
one fumble. He started fifty-three games for the Giants and finished 
his career with one hundred and forty-one receptions, an 18.3 yards-
per-catch average and twenty-one touchdowns. His best season was 1988, 
when he hauled in forty passes and scored seven times. The highlight of 
Baker's NFL career came in Superbowl XXV, as the Giants defeated the 
Buffalo Bills 20-19. He caught two passes--one of them a fourteen yard 
touchdown pass from Jeff Hostetler with just twenty-five seconds left 
in the first half to cut the Giants' deficit to 12-10.
  Madam Speaker, we rise today to commend and congratulate Stephen 
Baker upon his achievements and induction into the Fresno Athletic Hall 
of Fame. I invite my colleagues to join me in wishing Mr. Baker 
congratulations on his many accomplishments.

                          ____________________
```