alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT WASHINGTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 276 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT WASHINGTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 277 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of December, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
The law says that employers cannot retaliate against workers for 

exercising their right to report federal tax fraud or underpayment under 

the Taxpayer First Act. For example, workers have a lawful right to:

• Report to, or assist in an investigation by, an employer or a federal 

enforcement agency about conduct that the employee reasonably 

believes violates federal tax law 

• Participate or assist in an administrative or judicial action taken by 

the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) relating to an alleged violation of 

federal tax law

If an employer has retaliated against you, act quickly! Workers must file 

a retaliation complaint with OSHA within 180 days after the alleged 

adverse action occurred or you became aware of it.

www.whistleblowers.gov • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • TTY 1-877-889-5627

OSHA 4136-06 2021

WORKERS HAVE 

THE RIGHT TO 

REPORT TAX FRAUD!
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 175 (Monday, November 17, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Pages D1270-D1271]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
NOMINATION
Committee on Finance: Committee concluded a hearing to examine the 
nomination of Neil M. Barofsky, of New York, to be Special Inspector 
General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program of the Department of the 
Treasury, after the nominee testified and answered questions in his own 
behalf.
NOMINATION
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs: Committee 
concluded a hearing to examine the nomination of Robert W. McGowan, of 
Nevada, to be a Governor of the United States Postal Service, after the 
nominee testified and answered questions in his own behalf.
NOMINATIONS
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs: Committee 
concluded a hearing to examine the nominations of Kathryn A. Oberly, to 
be an Associate Judge of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, who 
was introduced by Senator Clinton, and Alfred S. Irving, Jr., to be an 
Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, who 
was introduced by Representative Norton, after the nominees testified 
and answered questions in their own behalf.

[[Page D1271]]

                        House of Representatives

Chamber Action
  The House was not in session today. The House is scheduled to meet at 
1 p.m. on Wednesday, November 19, 2008, pursuant to section 2 of H. 
Con. Res. 440.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 174 (Thursday, November 13, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10533]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Byrd).
  The legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                Washington, DC, November 13, 2008.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the 
     Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable 
     Bernard Sanders, a Senator from the State of Vermont, to 
     perform the duties of the Chair.
                                                   Robert C. Byrd,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. SANDERS thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```
#### John Lafollett v. Jeremiah McCarthy.

1. Slander.—In a case of slander the words charged were *“*Yon had better go to Tom McWade and pay him back the $20 you got from Km by false pretenses.” *Held,*that the words imply malice.

2. Instructions—Pleadings and proofs.—Where defendant did not show any circumstances tending to rebut the implication of malice but merely testified that the words used were different from those laid in the declaration, and this upon the pleadings and proof was the only issue for the jury to try, the defendant can not complain that the instructions did not submit the question of malice.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Champaign county; the Hon. Cyrus Epler, Judge, presiding.

Opinion filed December 4, 1885.

Mr Francis M. Wright and Mr. L. A. Smyres, for appellant.

Mr. J. L. Bay, for appellee.

Pleasants, J.

Case for slander, plea not guilty, verdict *88and judgment for plaintiff for $55, and appeal by defendant, whose complaint is that the instructions did not submit to the jury the question of malice under the rule in Zuckerman v. Sonnenschein, 62 Ill. 115.

The words charged are: “You had better go to Tom McWade and pay him back the twenty dollars you got from him by false pretenses,” and there was evidence clearly tending to prove them. Unexplained they impute a crime, not indeed by strict definition, which is unnecessary, but by general description identifying it to the common understanding, as by, a name, which is sufficient and therefore implies malice. What distinguishes the case from the one above cited is the failure on the part of the defendant here to show any circumstances tending to rebut this implication. He merely testified that the words used were different from those laid in the declaration. Thus, upon the pleadings and proofs the. only-issue for the jury to try was upon the speaking of the words so laid, and upon this issue they were fairly instructed.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 11




<PAGE>





                                   EXHIBIT 11


              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                   Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                                      December 31,               December 31,
                                                 ----------------------      ---------------------
                                                  1996           1997          1996         1997
                                                 -------       --------      --------     --------
Computation Basic Earnings Per Share:

<S>                                           <C>            <C>          <C>          <C>    
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
      Average shares issued                      515,125        515,125      515,125      515,125
      Less: average unallocated ESOP shares      (35,029)       (30,908)     (35,029)     (30,908)
      Less: Unearned MSBP shares                 (11,765)        (9,368)     (12,558)      (9,777)
      Less: Average Treasury shares              (59,450)       (97,668)     (50,300)     (93,213)
                                               ---------      ---------    ---------    ---------
Weighted average shares outstanding              408,881        377,181      417,238      381,227
                                               =========      =========    =========    =========

Computation Diluted Earnings Per Share:

Weighted average shares
   outstanding (per above basic EPS)             408,881        377,181      417,238      381,227
      Plus: Dilutive effect of MSBP shares           768          1,577          507        1,509
      Plus: Dilutive effect of Stock options       4,523         11,092        2,988       10,205
                                               ---------      ---------    ---------    ---------
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding      414,172        389,850      420,733      392,941
                                               =========      =========    =========    =========

Net earnings                                   $ 138,682      $ 124,044    $ 240,546    $ 383,901
                                               =========      =========    =========    =========

Earnings per share:
Basic                                          $     .34      $     .33    $     .58    $    1.01
                                               =========      =========    =========    =========

Diluted                                        $     .33      $     .32    $     .57    $     .98
                                               =========      =========    =========    =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed financial statements for the period ended June 30,1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                             762,742
<SECURITIES>                                     2,625,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,037,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (776,888)
<INVENTORY>                                        589,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,230,001
<PP&E>                                             664,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                      87,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,937,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,269,106
<BONDS>                                             75,084
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                        930,000
<COMMON>                                             5,792
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,657,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,121,976
<SALES>                                          9,297,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,297,715
<CGS>                                            3,057,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,057,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   266,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,496,717)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,496,717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,496,717)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.30)



</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 13.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Enacted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





FE Battery Metals Corp. (the “Company”)
is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2023 (the “Report”).



I, Gurminder Sangha, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(i) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|/s/ Gurminder Sangha    | 
|----------------------- | 
|Gurminder Sangha        | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 





August 1, 2023



---
La Salle County, Texas; the Honorable Joel Rodriguez Jr., in his official capacity as

County Judge, La Salle County, /s 

# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

November 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00651

- CV

Philip Wayne HINDES and Melinda Hindes Eustace, Appellant s

v.

LA SALLE COUNTY, Texas; the Honorable Joel Rodriguez Jr., in his official ca pacity as County Judge, La Salle County, Texas; and the Honorable Raul Ayala, in his official capacity as County Commissioner, Precinct 4, La Salle County, Texas, Appellee s

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas Trial Court No. 12

- 09

- 00179

- CVL Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In this accelerated appeal, A ppellant s ’ brief wa s due to be filed on Octo ber 24 , 201 4

. This court granted A ppellant s’ f irst motion for extension of time to file the brief until November
24 , 2014

. On November 19, 201 4

, A ppellant s filed a n unopposed second m otion for extension
of time to file the brief until December 3, 2014, for a total extension of for ty days.

Appellant s ’ motion is GRANTED. Appellant s ’ brief must be filed with this court by
December 3 , 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d). No further extensions of time to file Appellants’ brief will be granted.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of November, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10399]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                SCHEDULE

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, this morning following leader remarks, we 
are going to be in morning business with Senators allowed to speak for 
up to 10 minutes each. There will be no rollcall votes today.

                          ____________________
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C.1350)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of BostonRestaurant Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)                                  The Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 24, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: August 29, 2005 | /s/ Fran Ross           |   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                        | Fran Ross               |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.

 

----
Planeje com antecedência e 

prepare-se 

Ofereça treinamento sobre doenças causadas 

pelo calor a todos os trabalhadores. Tenha um 

plano de emergência. 

Para saber mais: 

1-800-321-OSHA (6742)

TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov/heat

A legislação federal dá direito a um local de trabalho seguro a 

todos os trabalhadores. Os trabalhadores têm o direito de se

manifestar sobre perigos sem medo de sofrer retaliação. Consulte 

www.osha.gov/workers para saber como registrar uma

reclamação confidencial junto à OSHA e solicitar uma inspeção. 

1-800-321-OSHA (6742) | TTY 1-877-889-5627

www.osha.gov/heat

OSHA 4299-08 2023

Trabalhe no calor 

com segurança Trabalhadores internos e externos correm 

o risco de sofrer de doenças causadas

pelo calor.

Doenças causadas pelo 

calor são evitáveis 

Beba água fresca Faça pausas para 

descansar 

Encontre uma 

área com sombra 

ou fresca 

Use roupas largas e 

de cor clara sempre 

que possível 

Verifique as 

condições do 

colega ao lado 

(e vice-versa) 

Alguns equipamentos 

podem aumentar sua 

exposição ao calor 
Se um trabalhador tiver: 

Dor de cabeça 

ou enjoo 

Fraqueza ou tontura Sudorese 

intensa 

Pele quente e seca 

Temperatura corporal 

elevada 

Sede Redução 

na quantidade 

de urina 

Adote estas medidas: • Beba água

• Retire as peças de roupas

desnecessárias

• Leve o trabalhador para uma

área mais fresca e use um

ventilador, se disponível

• Resfrie com água e gelo

• Não deixe o trabalhador

sozinho

• Em caso de dúvida, ligue

9-1-1 para o serviço de 

emergência

Sinais de emergência médica 

Pensamento ou 

comportamento 

anormal 

Perda de 

consciência 

Fala arrastada Convulsões 

1. Ligue 9-1-1 imediatamente para o serviço

de emergência

2. Resfrie imediatamente o trabalhador com 

água ou gelo

3. Retire as peças de roupas desnecessárias do

trabalhador e lhe dê água fresca para beber

4. Permaneça com o trabalhador até a chegada da ajuda
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 172 (Thursday, November 6, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1261]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
  No committee meetings were held.
```
#### ALPHA WATERS v. LEVI STUBBS.

A plaintiff, after judgment in her favor, has no right to have the defendant’s land sold, without first having his homestead laid off. The excess only, •after a homestead has been assigned to the defendant, is subject to execution sale.

The plaintiff brings an aetiom in the nature of Ejeetment, and after trial and verdiet, asks leave to amend tire pleadings, so as to change it into an action to remove a cloud from her title, caused by fraudulent deeds set up by third persons: Held, that such amendment was irregular, and ought not t® have bees allowed.

Civil Action in the nature of *Ejectment,*tried before before Moore, J., at Spring Term, 1876, Beaufort Superior Court.

The facts necessary to an understanding of the case as decided, are fully stated in the opinion of the Court.

There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, whereupon the defendant appealed.

*Q. H. Brcnon, J.r,*and *Mullen & Moore*for the appellant.

*Carter,*contra.

*29Reade, J.

Without laying off the defendant’s homestead to which he was entitled, the plaintiff had the land levied on and sold; and bought the same; and instituted this action to recover thepossession. The plaintiffhas no right to recover the possession. If the fond had been worth more than the homestead, and. the plaintiff had caused the homestead to be laid off, then) of course, the excess would have been subject, to executiomsale gbut it wras not done, and it is found as a-fact that the homestead will cover the whole land.

There must be judgment, therefore, for the defendant.

After trial and. verdict the plaintiff asked leave to amend her complaint, so- as to change it into an action to remove a cloud from, her title caused by fraudulent deeds set up by third persons. This was irregular and) ought not to have been allowed.

Pee Curiam. Judgment reversed, andjudgment here for defendant.
### MANDATE



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00019

- CR

George Castillo, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appealed from the 179th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1393207). Opinion delivered Per Curiam.

TO THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on August 1 8, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its
order in these words:

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS , the Hon. Kem Thompson Fr ost , Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, November 13, 2015

.
**EXHIBIT 31.02**I, Michael D. Matte, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for CyberGuard Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 8, 2005         /s/ Michael D. Matte   Michael D. Matte   Chief Financial Officer