alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10(d)21

 

**BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS**

 

**GULF POWER COMPANY**

 

Effective as of March 1, 2009, the following are the annual base salaries of the current Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Gulf Power Company and certain other current or former executive officers of Gulf Power Company who served as such during 2008.

 

| Susan N. Story

President and Chief Executive Officer                | $396,084         |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
| Philip Raymond

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer           | $228,433         |
| P. Bernard Jacob

Vice President                                     | $230,346         |
| Theodore J. McCullough

Vice President                               | $182,973

  |
| Bentina C. Terry

Vice President                                     | $228,433

  |
| Ronnie R. Labrato

Vice President of Southern Company Services, Inc. | $262,500         |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-K FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK>        0000277595
<NAME>       ENERGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      295,881
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    371,122
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         242,165
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  10,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 919,797
<COMMON>                                           288
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      188,643
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            112,212
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 301,143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           279,602
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             202,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,855
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 135,197
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  919,797
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      448,230
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             3,097
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     396,244
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     399,341
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         48,889
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               3,014
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  51,903
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        22,906
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,997
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   28,997
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        15,299
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,250
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          63,099
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
        

</TABLE>
#### J. C. HALYBURTON and others v. JOHN CARSON, Executor.

*Practice*— Judgment—Power *to vacate.*

A Court may vacate or modify its judgment during the term.

*(Fcdrcloth*v. *Isler,*76 N. C., 49; *Dick*v. Dickson, 63 N. C.', 488; *'Sneed*v. Leigh, 3 Dev., 364, cited and approved.)

Appeal from an order made at spring term, 1878, of McDowell superior, court, by Cloud, *J. \*

. Upon complaint and answer and the report of a referee filed in the cause, His Honor on motion of plaintiffs’ attorney, gave judgment against defendant. And on a subse*17quent day of the same term, on motion of defendant’s attorney, His Honor ordered that said judgment be vacated on the ground that the court erred in granting it, and from, this the plaintiffs appealed.

No counsel in this court for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Gilliam & Gatling*and *J. G. Bynum,*for defendant..

Ashe, J.

The only question presented for the consideration and decision of this court in this voluminous record of' seventy-two pages is, whether a judge of a superior court has the power to vacate a judgment rendered by him during the same term.

It is familiar learning that all the proceedings of a court of record are *in fieri*— under the absolute control of the-judge, subject to be amended, modified or annulled at any time before the expiration of the term in which they are had or done.

*Faircloth*v. *Isler,*76 N. C. 49; *Dick*v. *Dickson,*63 N. C. 488; *Sneed*v. *Leigh,*3 Dev. 364; Coke upon Littleton 1st Am. Ed. 260 (a.)

No error. Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1


 


SECOND AMENDMENT


TO


REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT


 


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO
REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of September 30, 2010 by
and among TECHNISCAN, INC., (the “Issuer”),
BIOTEX PHARMA INVESTMENTS, LLC (the “Lead
Investor”).


 


R  E  C  I  T  A
L  S:


 


WHEREAS,
the Issuer and the Lead Investor desire to revise that certain Registration
Rights Agreement dated March 30, 2010 entered into by and among the
Issuer, the Lead Investor, and the other holders listed on Schedule I thereto,
as amended pursuant to that certain Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement
dated as of May 10, 2010 
(collectively, the “Agreement”).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual benefits
to be derived from this Amendment, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1.             Amendment
of the Agreement.  (a)  Pursuant to Section 10 of the
Agreement, in Section 1 the definition for “Effectiveness
Deadline” shall be revised as follows:


 


Each of the numbers 120 and 165
in clause (i) of such definition shall be deleted and replaced with the
number 192.


 


(b)  The reference to “Schedule
I” in the first paragraph of the Agreement is replaced by a reference to “the
signature pages.”


 


2.             Continued
Effect of the Agreement.  All provisions of the Agreement, except as
modified by this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect and are
reaffirmed.  Other than as stated in this
Amendment, this Amendment shall not operate as a waiver of any condition or
obligation imposed on the parties under the Agreement.


 


3.             Interpretation
of Amendment.  In the event of any conflict, inconsistency,
or incongruity between any provision of this Amendment and any provision of the
Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall govern and control.


 


4.             Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in any number
of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which
together shall constitute one and the same agreement.  A facsimile or e-mailed “.pdf” data file copy
of an original written signature shall be deemed to have the same effect as an
original written signature.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to
Registration Rights Agreement as of the date first set forth above.


 


	
  TECHNISCAN, INC.

  	
   

  	
  BIOTEX PHARMA INVESTMENTS, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ David C. Robinson

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Robert Kessler

  
	
  David C. Robinson

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Robert Kessler

  
	
  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Member
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ex Parte Richard Mark Bowman

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 3

- 0 1045

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 9 2 1 60 7

Trial court: Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No

. 2 of Harris County

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant Richard Mark Bowman’s application for writ of habeas corpus. The clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed with this

Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 31 .1 . Appellant’s counsel has filed a letter s tating that it serves “as Mr. Bowman’s formal request that this matter be handled by this Court as any other direct appeal, with full briefing as well as oral argument in the even t this Court believes argument

would be warranted.” We construe the letter as a motion requesting “full briefing and, if warranted, oral argument.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1. We grant the motion in part and dismiss it in part

.

To the extent appellant requests the opportunity to file a brief, we grant the motion.

A ppellant’s brief is due no later than 2 0 days from the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 31.1. Appellee’s brief, if any, is due no later than 2 0 days from the date of the filing of appellant’s brief. See id

.

If appellant desires oral argument in this appeal, he must comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.1(e) and 39.7. We will determine if oral argument is necessary after the parties’ briefs are filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 39.1. We , therefore, dismis s appella nt’s request for oral argument.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Terry Jennings



Date: December 17, 2013
From: Schofield, Ashleigh (OST)

To: Gertel, Angelica (OST)

Subject: FW: Act Now to Preserve US Jobs and Aircraft Safety!

Date: Thursday, May 21, 2015 3:09:30 PM

-----Original Message-----

From: monarw@comcast.net [mailto:monarw@comcast.net]

Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 12:05 PM

To: Anthony Foxx (OST)

Subject: Act Now to Preserve US Jobs and Aircraft Safety!

Mona Key

4487 Post Place #32

Nashville, TN 37205-1623

May 21, 2015

Anthony Foxx

Secretary of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Anthony Foxx:

Dear Secretary Foxx,

I am writing to ask you to deny Norwegian Air International's application

for foreign air carrier certification. As a flight attendant at American

Airlines, I am concerned about NAI's proposed business model. NAI has made

no secret of their intention to operate as a "flag of convenience" carrier

in violation of the spirit of the US-EU Open Skies agreement. If its

application is approved, NAI will:

* Threaten the labor standards of all carriers operating in the

transatlantic market, the busiest aviation market in the world;

* Trigger a race to the bottom among airlines on both sides of the

Atlantic Ocean in order to compete with NAI's low-cost outsourced flight

crews; and

* Create significant security risks by allowing flight crews without

proper screening unfettered access to secure areas our in American

airports. Protect the labor standards of airline workers in the United

States and Europe. Do not set a precedent for carriers to operate under a

flag of convenience. Please deny NAI's application.

Sincerely,

Sincerely,

Mona Key
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of ING Insurance
Company of America (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the officer's
knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


August 12, 2004                                By /s/ Brian D. Comer
----------------                                  ------------------------------
     (Date)                                       Brian D. Comer
                                                  President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LESHAWN WASHINGTON, §

§ No. 182, 2014

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below: 

§

v. § Superior Court of the 

§ State of Delaware, in and for

STATE OF DELAWARE, § New Castle County

§

Plaintiff Below, § C.R. I.D. No. 1012007994

Appellee. §

Submitted: November 12, 2014

Decided: November 13, 2014

Before HOLLAND, RIDGELY, and VALIHURA, Justices.

O R D E R

This 13th day of November 2014, the Court, upon consideration of the 

parties’ briefs and the record in this case, has concluded that this appeal should be 

affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its 

Order of March 21, 2014;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
**Exhibit 31(b)1**

**ALABAMA POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Charles D. McCrary, certify that:

1.

  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Alabama Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 26, 2007

/s/Charles D. McCrary

Charles D. McCrary

President and Chief Executive Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BRUCE D. BERLINGER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4273

)

ROBERTA SUE CASSELBERRY, )

f/k/a SUE C. BERLINGER, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed May 10, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 

from the Circuit Court for Collier County; 

Elizabeth V. Krier, Judge.

Robert M. Presley of Presley and Presley, 

P.A., Wellington, for Appellant.

Joshua R. Kon, Robert A. Stok, and David 

I. Rosenblatt of Stok, Folk & Kon, Aventura, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. See Stubbs v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 250 So. 3d 151 (Fla. 

2d DCA 2018).

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
1 Evite caminar sobre, debajo o a través de 

vagones, o entre vagones de menos de 10 

pies de separación en la misma pista al 

transitar por la terminal.

Cinco maneras de mantenerse seguro cuando se trabaja 

con vagones de ferrocarril en terminales marítimas

2 Solo use escaleras, escalones u otras partes 

de vagones que estén destinados a ser de pie 

o de mano cuando acceda a los vagones.

3 Verifique el estado de las rejillas y tenga cuidado 

al caminar y trabajar en plataformas de vagones. 

Las prácticas de trabajo también deben estar en 

su lugar para evitar caídas del equipo.

4 Guarde cerraduras de torsión, conos o 

conectores entre cajas cuando no esté en uso.

5 Donde se trabaje con vagones, haga que las 

pistas sean inaccesibles para otros equipos 

y use pendones, luces o letreros para marcar 

claramente su cierre.

Departamento de Trabajo de los EE. UU. t www.osha.gov t (800) 321-OSHA (6742)

OSHA 4368-08 2023 | Spanish

Recuerde: Notifique a su supervisor de cualquier equipo dañado o condiciones inseguras.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          56,372                  56,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,873                  66,873
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,409                   8,409
<INVENTORY>                                      1,249                   1,249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,221                 122,221
<PP&E>                                          39,393                  39,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,403                   7,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,988                 256,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,455                  51,455
<BONDS>                                        194,212                 194,212
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       260,234                 260,234
<OTHER-SE>                                   (249,447)               (249,447)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,988                 256,988
<SALES>                                         49,633                  82,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,633                  82,053
<CGS>                                           38,601                  65,237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,601                  65,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,283                  95,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,922                   4,364
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,443                  14,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,752)                (78,972)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,752)                (78,972)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,752)                (78,972)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.50)                  (4.22) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.50)                  (4.22)
        


</TABLE>
Apoyémonos mutuamente 

Temas de conversación sobre salud mental 

en el lugar de trabajo 

Los lugares de trabajo pueden ser una fuente de estrés, pero también son lugares donde 

podemos encontrar apoyo, recursos y conexiones. Podemos crear una cultura laboral que 

apoye la salud mental hablando de salud mental. 

He aquí algunas formas para iniciar una conversación en el trabajo. 

Preguntas de comprobación 

¿Qué tal va todo? 

¿Cómo va tu mañana? 

¿Cómo te sientes con el nuevo 

proyecto? 

¿Cómo puedo ayudarte con 

tu proyecto? 

Seguimiento 

¿Quieres ayuda con eso? 

¿Cómo puedo ayudarte hoy? 

Mi puerta está abierta. 

Estoy aquí si deseas charlar. 

¿Has hecho alguna pausa hoy? 

Crear conexiones 

Últimamente has estado muy 

ocupado/a, ¿haces pausas para 

recargar energías? 

¿Has visto algo bueno últimamente? 

Estoy buscando algo nuevo para ver. 

¿Qué es lo más destacado de tu 

semana hasta ahora? 

¿Tienes algún plan que te 

entusiasme para el fn de semana? 

¿Cómo aprendiste a dominar esa 

habilidad? 

¿Qué has estado haciendo 

últimamente fuera del trabajo? 

• osha.gov/workplace-stress • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL