alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 355 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 355

To amend title 13, United States Code, to eliminate the provision that 
  prevents sampling from being used in determining the population for 
purposes of the apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the 
                            several States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 1999

 Mr. Moynihan (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 13, United States Code, to eliminate the provision that 
  prevents sampling from being used in determining the population for 
purposes of the apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the 
                            several States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``A Just Apportionment for All States 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF SAMPLING.

    Section 195 of title 13, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``Except for the determination of population for purposes of 
apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the several States, 
the'' and inserting ``The''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         432,898
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,595
<INVENTORY>                                    154,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,161,336
<PP&E>                                       3,633,075
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,079,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,929,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,667,465
<BONDS>                                        129,395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,475,175
<COMMON>                                        20,568
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,374,475)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,929,417
<SALES>                                        128,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284,048
<CGS>                                          111,737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,546,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,496,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,519,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,519,655)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,519,655)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAFAEL AREVALO-OROZCO, a.k.a.

Rafael Arevalo Orosco,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-70913

Agency No. A092-750-172

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 23, 2010** 

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Rafael Arevalo-Orozco, a native a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, and review de novo questions of

FILED

AUG 31 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 06-70913

law and constitutional claims. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.

2002). We deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Arevalo-Orozco’s motion to

reconsider because the motion failed to specify an error in the BIA’s underlying

order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1). Contrary to his contention, Arevalo-Orozco is

ineligible for relief under former section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed

1996), because his ground of removability lacks a statutory counterpart in a ground

of inadmissibility. See 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(5); Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203,

1207 & 1208 n.7 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc). Arevalo-Orozco’s remaining legal and

constitutional challenges to the BIA’s determination that he is ineligible for section

212(c) relief are unavailing. See Abebe, 554 F.3d at 1207 & 1208 n.7. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 650 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 650

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to provide for 
    coverage under that Act of employees of the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 1999

 Mr. Wellstone (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to provide for 
    coverage under that Act of employees of the Federal Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employees Safety Enhancement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.

    Section 3(5) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 
U.S.C. 652(5)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(5) The term `employer' means a person engaged in a 
        business affecting commerce who has employees, including the 
        United States and the United States Postal Service, but does 
        not include any State or political subdivision of a State.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. §1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of A.S.V., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Thomas R. Karges, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.               /s/ Thomas R. Karges   Thomas R. Karges   Chief Financial Officer   Thomas R. Karges   May 10, 2006
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texa s** 

October 3, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00348

- CR

Jacob KLEIN

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2866 Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant ’ s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel certifies he served copies of th e brief and motion on appellant, informed appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, and provided appellant with a form for requesting the record and explained to appellant the procedure for obtaining the

record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State , 954

S.W.2d 83 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet. ); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet. ). To date, appellant has not filed the for m provided by

his counsel.

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we order that he do so on or before N ovember 17, 2014 . The State has filed a notice waiving its right to file a brief in this case unless appellant files a pro se brief. If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after appellant = s pro se brief is filed in this court.

We further order the motion to withdraw filed by appellant ’ s counsel held in abeyance pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

- 82 (1988) (holding that motion to withdraw should not be ruled on before appellate court independently reviews record

to determine whether counsel ’ s evaluation that appeal is frivolous is sound); Schulman v. State

, 252 S.W.3d 403, 410

- 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (same).We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on a ppellant, his counsel, the attorney for the State, and the clerk of the trial court.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### THE GOVERNOR TO THE USE OF JOHN HALCOMBE *vs.*THOMAS S. DEAVER AND OTHERS.

December 1842.

Where a debt is due to A. and he places it in the hands of a constable fox-collection, A. is the only person who’can maintain, as relator, aji action on the official bond of the constable for a breach of duty, notwithstanding A. may have afterwards assigned his interest in the debt to anothei-.

The cases of *State*v IAghtfoot, 2 Ired. 310, and *Governor*v *Franklin,*4 Hawks, 274-, cited and approved.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law oí Yancy County, at Fall Term, 1841, his Honor Judge Manly presiding.

This was an action of debt upon the official bond of the defendant Deaver, as a constable of the County of Buncombe. The breach alleged was, that the constable had not diligently endeavored to collect a certain judgment in favor of the relator against one Hickman, and the relator, as a part of his evidence, introduced a receipt from the officer to him for the said judgment. After the evidence on the part of the plaintiff was closed, the defendant called a witness and prov*57ed, that he, (the witness,) being indebted to Haleombe, the relator, put into his hands the claim upon which this ment was founded, with an understanding that it was to be collected by the relator, and be a payment upon the debt due him from the witness. Before, however, this action was brought, but after the omission and negligence on the part of the officer, the witness paid his debt to the relator; and, at the time this suit was brought, was alone beneficially interested in the collection of the debt from Hickman, and the suit was prosecuted in fact for his benefit. Upon this state of the facts, the defendants’ counsel moved the court to instruct the jury, that the action could not be maintained upon the relation of Haleombe, but the court declined giving such instruction. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and a rule for a new trial having been granted and discharged and a judgment rendered pursuant to the verdict, the defendant appealed.

*Clingman*for the plaintiff.

*Francis*for the defendant.

Daniel, J.

The judgment against Hickman, which was placed in the hands of the defendant Deaver, as constable, for collection, had been obtained in the name of the relator; he was therefore the legal owner, and the contract of the constable to collect the judgment was made with the relator.— When the loss of the debt happened by the negligence of the constable, Haleombe, the relator, and he only, had immediately thereupon a legal right of action on the constable’s bond. The party injured at the time of the breach of the condition of the bond, must, of necessity, be the relator. He cannot assign his interest in the *chose in*action, so as to enable the assignee thereafter to bring an action on the bond as relator. The subsequent dealings of the witness with Haleombe, as stated in the case, made the witness only an equitable as-signee of this demand, with which a court of law had no*58thing to' do. *State*v *Lightfoot,*2 Ired. 310. *Governor*v Franklin, 4 Hawks, 274.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
밀폐 공간에서 근로자의 온열 질환 예방

밀폐된 공간에서의 작업은 근로자의 온열 질환 위험을 증가시킬 수 있습니다.

•	 온도가 외기보다 높은 경우가 많습니다

•	 일반적으로 공기 흐름이 원활하지 않습니다

•	 개인 보호 장비(PPE)는 신체 과열을 유발할 수 있습니다

조선소 고용
9-1-1

온열 질환의 징후를 숙지하고 계십시오

온열 질환의 첫 징후가 나타나는 즉시 조치를 취하십시오. 온열 질환은 빠르게

악화될 수 있습니다. 확실하지 않은 경우 911에 신고합니다!

근로자가 다음 증상을 경험하는

경우:

•	 두통 또는 메스꺼움

•	 쇠약 또는 어지러움

•	 심한 발한 또는 뜨겁고 건조한

피부

•	 체온 상승

•	 갈증

•	 소변 배출 감소

다음 조치를 취하십시오.

•	 밀폐 공간에서 벗어나기

•	 서늘한 곳으로 이동하기

•	 마실 물 제공하기

•	 개인 보호 장비(PPE)와 불필요한

의복 제거하기

•	 물, 얼음 또는 선풍기로 열 식히기

•	 혼자 두지 않기

•	 필요한 경우 의학적 치료 받기

다음은 의학적 응급 상황의 징후입니다!

•	 비정상적인 사고 또는 행동

•	 불분명한 발음

•	 발작

•	 의식 상실

즉시 911에 신고합니다

곧바로 물이나 얼음으로 근로자의 열을 식힙니다

지원이 도착할 때까지 근로자의 곁에 머무릅니다
온열 질환 예방을 위해 할 수 있는 일

계획 수립 및 교육 제공  •	 자주 휴식을 취하도록 합니다. 

•	 온열 질환 예방에 도움이 되는 휴식 시간은 온도, 습도 및 작업

계획을 수립하고 이를 감독자 조건을 고려하여 근로자가

및 근로자에게 안내합니다. 열로부터 회복할 수 있을 만큼

모니터링 충분히 길어야 합니다.  , 적응, 작업 또는 휴식

일정, 응급 상황과 같은 요소를 통제 설정 및 현장 활동 모니터링

포함시킵니다. •	 작업 전, 작업 공간의 온도를 •	 모든 근로자를 대상으로 온열 확인합니다. 실외 활동을 질환 위험, 증상, 대응 절차, 예방 계획할 때는 OSHA-NIOSH 열 조치에 관한 교육을 실시합니다.  안전 도구 앱을 사용합니다. 

작업 일정 계획 •	 공간을 환기하여 더 시원한

•	 신입 및 복귀 근로자가 열에 공기를 유입시키고 공기

대한 내성을 키우고 흐름을 생성합니다. (적응할

수 있도록 하고) 자주 휴식을 •	 근로자가 자신과 동료에게

취할 수 있도록 합니다. 20% 온열 질환의 징후가 있는지

의 규칙을 준수합니다. 이 안전 모니터링하는 버디 시스템을

관행은 첫날 고온 환경에서 구현합니다.

최대 강도로 작업하는 시간이 •	 서늘하거나 그늘진 구역을

근무 시간의 휴식 공간으로 지정합니다. 20%를 초과하지

않도록 규정합니다 •	 시원한 식수를 제공합니다. . 근로자가

고온 작업에 적응할 때까지 최대 근로자가 20분마다 최소 1컵을

강도로 작업하는 시간을 하루에 마시도록 장려합니다.

20% 이하씩 늘립니다. •	 근로자가 가능한 한 통기성이

•	 열 조건에 따라 작업 지속 시간 좋은 헐렁한 의복을

또는 주간 작업 기간을	 착용하도록 합니다.

조정합니다. 근로자 간 작업을

교대하는 것을 고려합니다.
추가 정보: 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) 

TTY 1-877-889-5627 

www.osha.gov/heat

기타 밀폐 공간 위험에 대한 자세한 내용은

www.osha.gov/maritime을 참조하십시오.

연방법은 귀하에게 안전한 근로 현장에 대한 권리를 부여합니다. 

귀하는 보복의 두려움 없이 위험에 대해 의견을 낼 권리가

있습니다. OSHA에 비공개 진정을 제기하고 조사를 요청하는

방법에 대한 정보는 www.osha.gov/workers를 참조하십시오.

자세한 내용을 확인하려면 QR 코드를 스캔하십시오.

OSHA 4354-08 2023
J

~~~ ED 3Tq p

~
iP UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

o ~ o

Q

PROj 0 ,G, ~ 

### MAR 16 2009

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Donald C. Gadbury Manager, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090

Dear Mr. Gadbury:

On October 3, 2008, the Department of Energy (DOE), Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) sent a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) requesting our concurrence to the changes made to the "Remote-Handled TRU Waste Characterization Program Implementation Plan (WCPIP), DOE/WIPP-02-3214, Revision 1 Draft CC".

For this concurrence EPA is focusing on one change — use of the word "container" in place of "payload" throughout the document. We understand the reason for this change is to allow greater consistency between how remote-handled (RH) waste is characterized and processed. We concur with this change.

The revision you sent did not address general issues we have with the WCPIP in its current revision. As we discussed on January 26, 2009, both EPA and DOE/CBFO agree on the need to make appropriate and comprehensive changes to the WCPIP to make it reflect the characterization of RH waste. My staff is committed to maintaining a dialog during the process of revising the WCPIP. We do consider the task of updating the WCPIP to be urgent. We expect CBFO to submit a revised WCPIP in a timeframe to allow EPA concurrence prior to any new RH program baseline inspection.

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462.



### Sincerely,



# ~~ Tom Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetabte Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Papercc: Electronic Distribution

Alton Harris, CBFO David Moody, CBFO Vernon Daub, CBFO Ava Holland, CBFO Casey Gadbury, CBFO Courtland Fesmire, CBFO J R Stroble, CBFO Norma Castaneda, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO Dennis Miehls, CBFO Jonathan Edwards, EPA Alan Perrin, EPA Steve Zappe, NMED Allison Pangle, CTAC Wayne Ledford, CTAC David Ploetz, WTS
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 99d

  EXHIBIT (99)(d) CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF JAMES CABLE
             FINANCE CORP. FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of James
Cable Finance Corp. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 14, 2003                               /s/ Daniel K. Shoemaker
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Daniel K. Shoemaker
                                                   Treasurer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certification accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 170 (Thursday, October 30, 2008)]
[House]
[Page S10525]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 154

WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2008

No. 170
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,633
<INVENTORY>                                     13,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               415,947
<PP&E>                                         287,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,223,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          221,721
<BONDS>                                        349,106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           493
<OTHER-SE>                                     606,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,223,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,642,216
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,483,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,547)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                145,537
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             86,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    86,230
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.66


</TABLE>