alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-73,556-03

EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER LAMAR MOORE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2007-503-C2B IN THE 54TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MCLENNAN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. According to

the record, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on December 10, 2020, but the transcript of the

hearing was not forwarded to this Court. Under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure, a reporter is required to transcribe a hearing within fifteen days of its conclusion and then

to immediately forward the transcript to the district clerk in the county of conviction. Id. at § 3(d). 

After receiving the transcript, the district clerk is required to forward it, among other things, to this

Court. Id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4).

The district clerk shall serve the reporter in Applicant’s case with a copy of this order and
2

then either forward to this Court the transcript of the evidentiary hearing or certify in writing that the

reporter has not transcribed the hearing. The district clerk shall comply with this order within thirty

days from the date of this order.

Filed: December 21, 2020

Do not publish
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6348]

[[Page 15449]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

59th Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of meeting RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
fifty-ninth meeting of RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 19, 2012, from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at National Center for Aviation 
Training, 4004 N. Webb Rd., Wichita, KS 67226.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at  http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 135. The agenda will 
include the following:

April 19, 2012

 Chairmen's Opening Remarks, Introductions
     Introduce FAA Representative
 Approval of Summary from the Fifty-Eighth Meeting--(RTCA Paper 
No. 025-12/SC135-687)
 Review proposed User's Guide
      Section 9
     Section 15
 Review Working Group activities
     Section 4
     Section 5
     Section 16
     Section 20
     Section 21
     Section 22
     Section 23
 RTCA Workspace Presentation
 New/Unfinished Business
     Errata Sheet
     Change Proposal Form User's Guide
     Change Proposal Form Rev H
     Schedule for User's Guide
 FAA TSO Template
 Establish Date for Next SC-135 Meeting
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 8, 2012.
John Raper,
Manager, Business Operations Branch, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-6348 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### Jack Cohn, Plaintiff, v Sandy Brodsky, Defendant.

City Court of Long Beach, Nassau County,

March 4, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jack Cohn,*plaintiff *pro se. Barry N. Birnbaum*for defendant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jerome B. Fleischman, J.

Plaintiff is the owner of a condominium unit at 185 West Park Avenue, Long Beach, New York. He brought this action to recover the sum of $135 for damages sustained by his *1021automobile when it allegedly struck a protruding part of a "Card Reader” which monitored the entrance to the parking lot of the condominium development claiming that said condition was caused about two months prior when another vehicle hit the "Card Reader” and that the Condominium Board was negligent in not repairing the same in all that time. However, plaintiff could not explain why he did not see the condition and stop or turn his vehicle to one side in order to avoid the accident.

Defendant counterclaimed for the cost of repairing the "Card Reader” claiming that the damage to it was caused by the plaintiff, and for attorney’s fees under the declaration of condominium. In support of this claim, defendant produced a security guard who testified that he saw plaintiff on a television monitor drive into the "Card Reader”. This was denied by plaintiff, whose testimony was supported by an independent witness.

I find, under CPLR 1401, that plaintiff was 100% at fault for the damage caused to his automobile. He apparently knew of the preexisting dangerous condition and should have been careful to avoid the accident.

I also find that the damage to the "Card Reader” was caused by someone other than plaintiff, prior to the date in question. The damage to plaintiff’s vehicle was a scratch on top of his left front fender. From the pictures introduced at trial of the "Card Reader” in proximity to plaintiff’s vehicle, plaintiff could not have sustained this damage by driving into the "Card Reader”. If plaintiff had struck the "Card Reader”, the damage to his vehicle would have been in a different place.

The attorney’s fees sought by defendant under the declaration of condominium are for the enforcement and collection of a lien for common charges. In fact, defendant had unilaterally assessed plaintiff for the repair of the damage to the "Card Reader”, apparently without affording him an opportunity to be heard, and made this part of his common charges. This, it has no power to do. While the board can assess common charges, based upon each unit’s proportionate share of the common expenses in accordance with its common interest under Real Property Law § 339-e (2) and § 339-m, in the case at bar the board assessed plaintiff’s unit for the damage, not *1022proportionally in accordance with its common interest, but 100% on the basis of an arbitrary determination as to liability. This can only be done in a plenary court action. Therefore, the defendant cannot recover attorney’s fees for the attempted enforcement of its improper assessment.

Both the complaint and counterclaims are dismissed.
#### STATE v. JOHN H. STRAUSS.

*City Or dinanee*— Criminal *Prosecution*— Defeet *in Indictment.*

Where the defendant is prosecuted under a City ordinance which provides that any person “refusing or neglecting to pay license tax, &c., for the space of five days, &c., shall be subject to criminal prosecution,” the indictment is fatally defective if it fails to allege that the defendant neglected or refused to pay the tax, &c., *for the space of five days.*

Criminal Action tried at January Special Term, 1877, of New Hanover Superior Court, before McKoy, *J.*

This was an appeal from the judgment of the Mayor of the City of Wilmington -who imposed a fine of $25 on the defendant for failing to obtain a license as liquor dealer, as provided by a City ordinance. Upon a special verdict in the Court below, His Honor adjudged the defendant guilty. Judgment. Appeal by defendant.

*Attorney General*and *Mr. D. L. Bussell,*for the State. *Messrs. A. T. $ J. London,*for the defendant.

Eaircloth, J.

The defendant was indicted for engaging in the business of a liquor dealer in the City of Wilmington without having obtained a license to so do, in violation of an ordinance of the City; to-wit, § 8, which provides “that *501any person refusing or neglecting to pay the license tax assessed against them for the privilege of doing business, *for the space of five days,*shall be subject to criminal prosecution, &c.”

Upon a special verdict the defendant was adjudged guilty. In this Court the objection was taken that the indictment does not allege that the defendant had neglected or refused to pay the tax and obtain a license for the space of *five days.*

On inspection we find this to be true. This is a fatal defect and the prisoner ought to have been acquitted. This allegation does not appear either in the bill,- the special verdict, or in the statement of the case. Nothing can be added to a special verdict by inference. If the bill is defective or any essential fact be omitted from the special verdict, the prisoner is entitled to an acquittal.

There is error.

Pee. Curiam. Judgment arrested.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 158 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10128]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          FIRE PREVENTION WEEK

  The resolution (S. Res. 699) supporting the goals and ideals of Fire 
Prevention Week, was agreed to.
  The preamble was agreed to.
  The resolution, with its preamble, reads as follows:

                              S. Res. 699

       Whereas firefighters have maintained their dedication to 
     the health and safety of the American public since the first 
     American fire departments were organized in the colonial era;
       Whereas more than 1,140,000 firefighters protect the United 
     States through their heroic service;
       Whereas approximately 1,600,000 fires are reported 
     annually;
       Whereas 102 firefighters lost their lives in the line of 
     duty in 2007;
       Whereas fire departments responded to nearly 400,000 home 
     fires in 2006;
       Whereas, in 2006, there were an estimated 396,000 reported 
     home structure fires resulting in 2,580 civilian deaths and 
     12,500 civilian injuries, and $6,800,000,000 in direct damage 
     in the United States;
       Whereas home fires cause 80 percent of civilian fire deaths 
     and 76 percent of injuries;
       Whereas heating equipment and smoking are the leading 
     causes of civilian home fire deaths;
       Whereas children under 5 and older adults face the highest 
     risk of home fire death, but young adults face a higher risk 
     of home fire injury;
       Whereas electrical distribution and lighting equipment were 
     involved in an estimated 20,900 reported home fires in 2005;
       Whereas home fires in 2005 resulted in 500 civilian deaths 
     and 1,100 injuries, with an estimated $862,000,000 in direct 
     property damage per year;
       Whereas working smoke alarms cut the risk of dying in 
     reported home structure fires in half;
       Whereas 65 percent of reported home fire deaths in 2000 
     through 2004 resulted from fires in homes with no smoke 
     alarms or no working smoke alarms;
       Whereas Fire Prevention Week is the longest running public 
     health and safety observance on record;
       Whereas we have honored firefighters for educating the 
     American public since President Harding declared the first 
     Fire Prevention Week in 1922;
       Whereas the National Fire Protection Association has 
     designated the week of October 5-11, 2008, as Fire Prevention 
     Week; and
       Whereas educating Americans on methods to prevent home 
     fires continues to be a priority for all firefighters: Now, 
     therefore, be it
       Resolved, That the Senate--
       (1) supports the work of firefighters to educate and 
     protect the Nation's communities; and
       (2) supports the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week, 
     October 5-11, 2008, as designated by the National Fire 
     Protection Association.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 777 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 777

  To require the Department of Agriculture to establish an electronic 
 filing and retrieval system to enable the public to file all required 
  paperwork electronically with the Department and to have access to 
  public information on farm programs, quarterly trade, economic, and 
           production reports, and other similar information.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 13, 1999

Mr. Fitzgerald introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Department of Agriculture to establish an electronic 
 filing and retrieval system to enable the public to file all required 
  paperwork electronically with the Department and to have access to 
  public information on farm programs, quarterly trade, economic, and 
           production reports, and other similar information.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom to E-File Act''.

SEC. 2. ELECTRONIC FILING AND RETRIEVAL.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall establish an 
electronic filing and retrieval system to enable the public to file all 
required paperwork electronically with the Department of Agriculture 
and to have access to public information on farm programs, quarterly 
trade, economic, and production reports, and other similar information.
    (b) Progress Reports.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall report to Congress on the 
progress made toward implementing subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### C. B. JUSTICE v. THE CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY.

*Appeal*— Assignment *of Errors.*

Where no errors are assigned, and none appear upon the face of tile record, the judgment will be affirmed.

*(Lytle*v. *Lytle,*94 N. C., 523; cited and approved).

MotioN by the defendant appellee to affirm the judgment below, made at February Term, 1887, of the Supreme Court.

*Mr. Theo. F.*Davidson, for the plaintiff.

*Messrs. W. P. Bynum and E. G.*Smith, for the defendant.

Davis, J.

The defendant appellee moves the Court to affirm the judgment rendered in the Court below, upon the ground that no exceptions were taken and no errors assigned for consideration and review by this Court.

No errors are pointed out or assigned in the record, and upon a careful examination we can find none.

We call the attention of the profession to the suggestion of Merrimon, Judge, in the case of *Lytle*v. *Lytle,*94 N. C., 523, in regard to appeals, and to rule 7, to be found in 92 N. C., 847.

In this case the judgment below must be affirmed. Let this be certified.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                           A.S.V., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                 EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     2003                      2002
                                                              ------------------        ------------------
<S>                                                           <C>                       <C>
BASIC
   Earnings
     Net earnings (loss)                                      $          767,583        $         (365,581)
                                                              ==================        ==================

   Shares
     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding                                             10,063,901                10,194,663
                                                              ==================        ==================

   Earnings (loss) per common share                           $              .08        $             (.04)
                                                              ==================        ==================

DILUTED
   Earnings
     Net earnings (loss)                                      $          767,583        $         (365,581)
                                                              ==================        ==================

   Shares
     Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding                                             10,063,901                10,194,663
     Assuming exercise of options and warrants
       reduced by the number of shares which could
       have been purchased with the proceeds from
       the exercise of such options and warrants                          49,733                         -
                                                              ------------------        ------------------

     Weighted average number of common and
       common equivalent shares outstanding                           10,113,634                10,194,663
                                                              ==================        ==================

   Earnings (loss) per common share                           $              .08        $             (.04)
                                                              ==================        ==================
</TABLE>
### DOCUMENTATION CHECKLIST FOR BASELINE OR TIER 1 EVALUATIONS
CH AND RH WASTE – STEP 1

Revision 1 April 15, 2013 Name for Tier 1 Evaluation Request:

Documents Provided with Request:

Needed a Documents Provided to EPA [indicate document name, source document #, or N/A)] b

 A K Summar y Re p ort
 Radiolo g ical Characterization Technical Report ( RH onl y)

 Certification Plan ( RH onl y)

 Confirmation Test Plan ( RH onl y)

 Samplin g Plan and Post Samplin g Memorandum

 QA Equivalenc y Document, Peer Review, Corroboratin g Data

 Batch Data Reports (BDRs) or BDR eqivalents of fully characterized containers or list of available BDRs if total available is extensive (NDA, DTC, VE, RTR, sampling, analytical, etc.), indicating how many have been through SPM &/or Project Level review

 List of all applicable procedures and SOPs, including but not limited to: AK, VE and/or RTR, NDA, DTC, laboratory sampling and analysis procedures (indicate applicable revisions and if the applicable revision has been superseded)

CCP-TP-005 Attachments:

 Attachment 1 (AK Documentation checklist)

 A ttachment 4 ( AK Information List )

a – All documents marked with “  ” are required for EPA’s review if applicable to this T1 request. b – Use Notes box below if additional space is needed.

Notes or Additional Documents Provided:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DERYL JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00009

- CR

Appeal from the

85th Judicial District Court

of Brazos County, Texas

(TC# 19

- 04458

- CRF

- 85)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDER ED THIS 2 7 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dectron Internationale Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ness Lakdawala, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Ness Lakdawala
------------------
Ness Lakdawala
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 30, 2004

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Dectron Internationale Inc. and will be retained by Dectron
Internationale Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23(d)1**

 

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-118060 and 333-128550 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 27, 2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Gulf Power Company, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gulf Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Atlanta, Georgia

February 27, 2006
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10673]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   CORRECTING ENROLLMENT OF S. 3001, DUNCAN HUNTER NATIONAL DEFENSE 
                 AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009

  Mr. SKELTON. Mr. Speaker, I send to the desk a concurrent resolution 
and ask unanimous consent for its immediate consideration in the House.
  The Clerk read the title of the concurrent resolution.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Missouri?
  There was no objection.
  The text of the concurrent resolution is as follows:

                            H. Con. Res. 442

       Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
     concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 3001, the 
     Secretary of the Senate shall make the following corrections:
       (1) In section 201(1), strike ``$11,045,052,000'' and 
     insert ``$10,943,840,000''.
       (2) In section 202(a), strike ``$11,799,660'' and insert 
     ``$11,799,660,000''.

  The concurrent resolution was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________
```
SLOPE IT 

800-321-OSHA (6742)