alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Servidyne, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: July 30, 2008
    
    /s/ Rick A. Paternostro

Rick A. Paternostro
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

George Lefevre, as Chief Executive Officer of MotivNation, Inc. (the “Company”), and Jay Isco, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that

 

(1)         the Company’s Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Dated:			February 13, 2007 | /s/ George LeFevre                      |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

George LeFevre

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

 

 

| Dated:			February 13, 2007 | /s/ Jay Isco                                    |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Jay Isco                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  
Chief Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 78 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 78

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the gift tax 
                         exclusion to $25,000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

    Mr. Lugar (for himself, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Helms) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the gift tax 
                         exclusion to $25,000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN GIFT TAX EXCLUSION.

    (a) In General.--Section 2503(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to exclusions from gifts) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$10,000'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``$25,000'',
            (2) by striking ``1998'' in paragraph (2) and inserting 
        ``2000'', and
            (3) by striking ``1997'' in paragraph (2)(B) and inserting 
        ``1999''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to gifts made after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10422]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    MINNIE COX POST OFFICE BUILDING

  The bill (H.R. 4010) to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 100 West Percy Street in Indianola, 
Mississippi, as the ``Minnie Cox Post Office Building,'' was 
considered, ordered to a third reading, read the third time, and 
passed.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2276]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  RECOGNIZING THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GENESEE COUNTY AWARD WINNER

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. DALE E. KILDEE

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. KILDEE. Madam Speaker, I ask the House of Representatives to join 
me in congratulating the individuals honored by the Child Advocacy 
Center of Genesee County for their service to the young people of the 
greater Flint area that are the victims of child abuse. Genesee County 
expressed its gratitude to these persons at a dinner on November 6, 
2008 in Flint, Michigan.
  The Child Advocacy Center of Genesee County was founded to react to 
allegations of child abuse. A multidisciplinary team responds by 
providing forensic interviews, medical evaluations, therapeutic 
intervention, and victim support/advocacy. Their goal is provide these 
services to children and families in a safe and consistent manner.
  Three persons were honored that evening. The 2008 Stars for Children 
Awards Law Enforcement Officer of the Year is Detective Diana Mills of 
the Mt. Morris Township Police Department. The 2008 Stars for Children 
Awards Child Protective Services Worker of the Year is Marie Putnam. 
Andrea Legendre was named the 2008 Stars for Children Awards Prosecutor 
of the Year.
  May the House of Representatives rise with me and applaud the work of 
these individuals. Their commitment to abused and vulnerable children 
is exemplary. They perform an invaluable service to our community and 
through their work abused and neglected children in Genesee County have 
help for a safer, happier life.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10831]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1504
                              AFTER RECESS

  The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the 
Speaker pro tempore (Mr. Udall of Colorado) at 3 o'clock and 4 minutes 
p.m.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE v. *W.*H. H. HOUSTON and others.

It is competent for a .Tudge of the Superior court, to authorize the sheriff, or any other person, to take a recognizance from a defendant for his appearance at the next term, to answer, &c., his Honor having first fixed the amount of such recognizance.

Although the recognizance authorized to be taken is put in the form of a bond, with conditions, signed and sealed by the defendants, yet it is valid as a recognizance

*(State*v. *Ediiey,*2 Winst, 71, cited and approved.)

Scxee Facias, on a forfeited recognizance, heard before Judge *Solum ok.*at Fall Term, 1875, of the Superior Court of MeckleNbubg county.

The defendant Houston had been indicted for foi’gery, and ¡aid was in custody when, upon his own affidavit, the case was continued. The court, after such continuance, made an order to discharge him from custody, upon Iris entering into recognizance with sureties, in the sum of twenty-five hundred dollars, for his appearance at the next term. This he did by executing a bond, with the other defendants as his sureties, in the sum specified and payable to the State of North Carolina, *550conditioned to be void should the defendant Houston appear, &c.

At the ensuing term he was called and failed, and a judgment *nini*entered against him. To the *noire ft dan*which issued , the defendants plead *mil tiel r card.*His Honor found that there was such a record, and gave judgment accordingly. Prom this judgment the defendants appealed.

*Shipp cé Bailey,*for defendants.

*Attorney General*IJuryrove, for the State.

Reads, J.

It was competent for his Honor to authorize the sheriff or other person, to take the recognizance of the defendants for the appearance of the principal defendant at the next term, to answer the charge of the State against him, his Honor having fixed the amount of the recognizance. And although the recognizance authorized to be taken was put in flie form of a bond with conditions, signed and sealed by the defendants, yet it is valid as a recognizance.

The taking of a recognizance consists in making and attesting a memorandum of the acknowledgment of a debt due the State, and of the conditions on which it is to be defeated. *State*v. *Edney,*2 Winst., 71.

There is no error. Let this be certified.

Pee Cdkiam. Judement affirmed.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Keith Schonerstedt

, * From the 104 th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 21975B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 185

- CR * February 3 , 20 2 2

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Keith Schonerstedt’s motion to dismiss this appeal

and concludes that the motion should be granted

. Therefore, in accordance with

this court ’ s opi nion, the appeal is dismissed

.
EXHIBIT 10(d)20

           SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

                               GULF POWER COMPANY

            Only non-employee directors are compensated for service on the Board
of Directors (the "Board") of Gulf Power Company (the "Company"). The pay
components are as follows:

         o   Annual Cash Retainer Fee:       $12,000

         o   Quarterly Stock Retainer Fee:   85 shares of common stock of The
                                             Southern Company

         o   Meeting Fees:                   $1,200 for each Board meeting
                                             attended, and $1,000 for each
                                             committee meeting attended.

         At the election of the director, all or a portion of the cash retainer
may be payable in common stock of The Southern Company, and all or a portion of
the total cash compensation may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan
and all of the stock retainer may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation
Plan until membership on the Board is terminated. There is no pension plan for
non-employee directors.
#### Edmund D. McNair *v.*Thomas Ragland.

As many executions, of any kind, as the plaintiff chooses, -may be sued out on the same judgment — but if executed wrongfully, or irregularly, it is at his peril.

At this term, *Scawell. Gaston*apd *Badger,*for the plaintiff,

moved for several writs of *fieri facias*on *43the decree entered against the defendant at the last'term, *(ante*1 *voL*516) directed to the sheriffs of several different counties; suggesting that the defendant removed his slaves from comity to county, so as to prevent a seizure of them.

The counsel admitted, that such practice had not been common in this State, buteontended that it was perfectly well settled in England ; and they cited *Tkill’s Practice*1032. *Primrose*v. *Gibson*'(16 *Eng. Com. Law*73) and *Miller*v. *Parnell*(l *Id.*414.)

*Nash*& Winston, for the defendant.

Huketn, Judge.

-A motion has been made in this case, for liberty to sue out two or more writs of *fieri facias*to different counties. Such a practice has nát yet prevailed generally in this State; thoug'h in one part of it, I learn, that, at one time, it was common to return, in vacation, a writ to one county, and take out another for a different county. The convenience and utility of tile practico are so apparent, that the court felt from the beginning no difficulty in granting the motion, but the want of a precedent. It is just and reasonable to give a creditor every 'facility for the security and collection of his debtj which is the more necessary here, since a most valuable portion of the property of our citizens as so easily removed from, one county to another. And we are glad to find, that it is a well known pro-ccedmg in England, to sue out as many executions as the party chooses ; he taking care how he uses them. For if lie abuse the process, the court would unhesitatingly set it aside, and leave him exposed to the. action of the person aggrieved. If he sue out' a *fi, Ja.*and proceed on it, he cannot execute á *ca. sa.*until a return of the other, and a proper credit on the process against the body. , This is necessary, that the officer may know the sum for which he detains the prisoner. And he levies both writs *offi,. fa,*under a responsibility for seizing too much. He must take care not to sell upon the second, seizure, until he has done, so under the first, and given ■the proper credit. ■ ■

*44Tf a *fi. fa*and ter cannotbe executed until the former is returned.

*Mr. Tiild.*states tbe suing out of two writs *offi. fa.*to be a settled practice *(Tidd’s Pr.*1032)-- A ad the cases of Miller v. *Parnell*and *Primrose*v. Gibson. are instances 0f *& f.fa.*and a *ca. sa.*issued, at once. There were motions to set them aside ; hut the court said it was per-fecfly regular — only the *ca.sa.*could not be. acted on after a levy of the *fi.fa.*until either a sale or due discharge of ^¡ie effects. The result of our examination is, that the plaintiff may sue out what executions, and as many ox them as lie chooses ; but he acts on them wrongfully, or irregularly, at his peril.

Pee, Curiam. — Motion aexowed.
¿Sabía usted que si trabaja con plomo, podría 

llevar este metal tóxico a casa en su ropa, zapatos, 

piel, pelo y manos? Cuando lleva plomo a casa, 

puede causar envenenamiento por plomo en los 

niños y otros miembros de la familia. Prevenga 

la contaminación de plomo en su casa y vehículo 

por lavarse, ducharse y cambiarse de la ropa y 

los zapatos de trabajo antes de salir del trabajo. 

La OSHA tiene reglamentos para proteger a los 

trabajadores de la exposición al plomo para industria 

general (1910.1025) y construcción (1926.62).

Trabajos comunes con exposición al plomo

•	 Pintura

•	 Renovación de edificios

•	 Reparaciones de 

radiadores 

•	 Puentes

•	 Campos de tiro

•	 Demolición

•	 Manufactura de pilas

•	 Producción de metales 

•	 Corte y reciclaje de 

fragmentos de metal

•	 Cerámica 

•	 Soldadura 

•	 Plomería

El plomo es peligroso para los niños y los adultos:

•	 El plomo daña el celebro, el 

sistema nervioso, la sangre, y 

los riñones. 

•	 Niveles bajos del plomo 

en la sangre puede causar 

problemas de aprendizaje y 

comportamiento en los niños 

menores de 6 años de edad.

•	 Niños y miembros de la familia que están embarazadas 

y que viven en su casa, deberían probarse la sangre 

para el plomo. Contacte a su doctor, clínica de 

salud, o departamento de salud local. 

¡Si usted trabaja con 

plomo, no lo lleve a casa!

Departamento de Trabajo 

OSHA 3736-06 2014

de los EE. UU.

Para más información:

Administración de

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional

DATOS 

RÁPIDOS
•	 Adultos que tienen niveles de plomo por encima 

de 30 μg/dL en la sangre debe ir a un doctor. 

•	 Algunos efectos dañinos del plomo son 

permanentes.

Los requisitos que los 

empleadores tienen que seguir 

para parar la exposición al plomo 

que lleva a casa:

•	 Probar el aire del lugar de trabajo 

y los niveles de sangre en los 

trabajadores para el plomo. 

•	 Decir si está trabajando con 

plomo y entrenar sobre la seguridad con el plomo. 

•	 Controlar el polvo y los vapores del plomo en el 

lugar de trabajo. 

•	 Proporcionar ropa y equipaje de protección para 

los trabajadores. 

•	 Ofrecer un lugar para lavarse las manos y ducharse. 

•	 Proporcionar un sitio donde los trabajadores 

pueden cambiar a ropa limpia. Mantener 

separadas la ropa de trabajo de la ropa de la calle.

Lo que puede hacer usted para 

prevenir la exposición al plomo que 

lleva a casa:

•	 Lávese las manos 

frecuentemente y dúchese al fin 

de turno de trabajo. 

•	 Cámbiese la ropa y zapatos de 

trabajo antes de irse a casa.

•	 No lleve a casa ropa de trabajo contaminada o 

zapatos expuestos al plomo. Si tiene que hacerlo, 

póngalos en una bolsa de plástico y lave la ropa 

de trabajo por separado. 

•	 Informe a su doctor que usted trabaja con el plomo.

Recuerde, mantenga a su familia segura y no lleve 

el plomo a casa.

Departamento de Trabajo 

de los EE. UU.

Para más información:

Administración de

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional

RÁPIDOS

DATOS
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 866

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to revise existing

regulations concerning the conditions of participation for hospitals and

ambulatory surgical centers under the medicare program relating to

certified registered nurse anesthetists’ services to make the regulations

consistent with State supervision requirements.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 22, 1999

Mr. CONRAD (for himself, Mr. CRAIG, and Mr. DORGAN) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to

revise existing regulations concerning the conditions of

participation for hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers under the medicare program relating to certified

registered nurse anesthetists’ services to make the regulations consistent with State supervision requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anesthesia Services

5 Preservation Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 866 IS

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

2 Congress finds the following:

3 (1) Certified registered nurse anesthetists

4 (CRNAs) provide more than 65 percent of the Na5 tion’s anesthetics.

6 (2) CRNAs are the sole anesthesia provider in

7 at least 65 percent of rural hospitals.

8 (3) In 1994, the Health Care Financing Admin9 istration (HCFA) issued a draft regulation deferring

10 to State law on the issue of physician supervision of

11 CRNAs.

12 (4) HCFA has issued a proposed rule deferring

13 to State law on the issue of physician supervision of

14 CRNAs in 1997.

15 (5) Many hospitals and health care profes16 sionals are concerned about the erroneous allegation

17 that surgeons are somehow automatically liable for

18 the acts of CRNAs and that this allegation serves as

19 a disincentive to use and work with CRNAs, and

20 may serve to limit consumer access to CRNAs’ anes21 thesia services, particularly in rural areas.

22 (6) HCFA has failed to issue a final rule with

23 respect to this issue after many years.
3

•S 866 IS

1 SEC. 3. REVISIONS OF CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION TO

2 FOSTER CONSISTENCY WITH STATE SUPER3 VISION STANDARDS.

4 (a) PROMULGATION OF REVISED REGULATIONS.—

5 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall revise

6 any regulations establishing medicare conditions of par7 ticipation for hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers re8 lating to anesthesia services under title XVIII of the Social

9 Security Act to provide that such regulations—

10 (1) do not impose any supervisory or other re11 quirements relating to the performance of such serv12 ices by certified registered nurse anesthetists

13 (CRNAs); and

14 (2) permit States to determine any supervisory

15 or other requirements relating to the performance of

16 anesthesia services by CRNAs.

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The revisions to the regula18 tions required by subsection (a) shall apply with respect

19 to anesthesia services furnished on or after January 1,

20 2000.

Æ
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 169 (Monday, October 27, 2008)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D1255]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
  No committee meetings were held.
```
Exhibit 10.2
 MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
(AS OF JULY 27, 2010)
 Retainer/Fees
  
    
    an annual cash retainer fee of $30,000 per year, plus an additional $50,000 for the Non-Executive
Chairman of the Board of Directors;
    
    an additional cash retainer of $7,500 per year for each member of the Audit Committee, plus an
additional $5,000 per year for the chairperson of the Audit Committee;
    
    an additional cash retainer of $4,000 per year for each member of the Compensation Committee, plus an
additional $4,000 per year for the chairperson of the Compensation Committee;
    
    an additional cash retainer of $14,000 per year for the chairperson of the Strategic Planning
Committee; and
    
    an additional fee of $1,000 for each Board of Directors meeting attended, including telephonic meetings.
 Equity-Based Compensation
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10627]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         ADVANCING AMERICA'S PRIORITIES ACT--MOTION TO PROCEED

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate will 
resume consideration of the motion to proceed to S. 3297.
  Mr. REID. Madam President, I ask permission to withdraw the motion to 
proceed to S. 3297.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The motion is withdrawn.

                          ____________________
```