alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### R. H. KINGSBURY v. WILLIAM R. GOOCH.

A bond given for money lent with a knowledge that it was to be used in hiring a substitute to go into the Confederate Army, is against public policy, and cannot be enforced.

Where a party desires to ascertain upon what particular points the verdict goes, he ought to request the Court to put such question to the jury before it is rendered.

*(Critafter*v. *Holloway, ante,*526, approved.)

(Beads andBoDMAN, JJ., *dissenting.)*

Debt, tried before *Walts, I.,*at Spring Term 1870 of Gbakvillb Court.

The plaintiff declared upon a bond for the payment of two thousand two hundred dollars, dated July 28,1862, with certain credits endorsed. The defendant pleaded, General issue, Payment and set off, Tender and refusal, Illegal consideration. The first plea was waived so far as it denied the execution of the bond.

It was shown that the consideration of the bond, was Confederate Treasury Notes, borrowed, as the plaintiff knew, for the purpose of enabling the defendant to put a *substitute*
      *529.into the Confederate Army. There was also evidence that the defendant, on the 18th of July 1863, had tendered to the plaintiff the whole of the amount then due, in Confederate money, and that the plaintiff had refused it.

His Honor intimated that the *tender*would not defeat the action, and instructed the jury that if the plaintiff knew for what the money had been borrowed, he could not recover.

The jury returned a verdict, — that they found *all the issues*in favor of the defendant. The Court enquired if they found *all*the issues in favor of the defendants. The jury remained silent, and the Court instructed the clerk to record the verdict as above. The defendant excepted, and submitted that the verdict was erroneous, inasmuch as the only issues submitted, were, Tender and refusal, and Illegal consideration, and that the jury meant to find only upon the latter., He thereupon moved for a new trial, for this reason; and also because, if the verdict were upon all the issues, it was against the evidence upon all but the last.

Motion overruled; Judgment, and Appeal by the plaintiff.

*Hayes,*for the appellant.

*G. M. Busbee, contra.*

Dick, J.

The plaintiff cannot enforce the contract sued on, as he loaned the money to the principal obligor, with a knowledge that it was to be used for the illegal purpose of hiring a substitute, to be "placed in the Confederate Army: *Critcher*v. Holloway, *ante,*526. The plea of the general issue was waived on the trial, and the general verdict, although informal, is not erroneous. If the counsel of the plaintiff deemed it important to ascertain upon what particular point the jury found their verdict, he ought to have requested his Honor to put such question to them before the. verdict was rendered: 3 Chit, Pr. 921.

*530There was no error, and the judgment must he affirmed.

Justices Reade and Rodman dissented.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
ex1010.htm


Exhibit 10.10


 


Filed as a PDF Reference


 



Summary of Material Terms of License Agreement with the Institute of Coal Chemistry







On January 11, 2006, Zibo Jiazhou Chemical entered into a licensing agreement with the Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (the “Licensor”), pursuant to which the Licensor granted Zibo Jiazhou Chemical an exclusive license to certain technology utilized in the production of maleic anhydride.  The license is valid until June 8, 2026.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NATIONAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC., AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDING MARCH
31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         151,969
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,004,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                   654,883
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,655,205
<PP&E>                                       9,813,530
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,591,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,428,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,137,179
<BONDS>                                      4,116,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           686
<OTHER-SE>                                     (46,920)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,428,450
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,576,888
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,398,496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,333,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (9,519)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             169,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (319,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (319,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (319,252)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.12)
        

</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2302 Lower Tribunal No. 19-13302

________________ 

### Daniel Alexis and Rose Alexis ,

Appellants, vs. 

### Newrez, LLC, etc. , Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Guzman, Judge. Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for appellants. Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., and Thomas A. Valdez, and Megan G. Colter (Tampa), for appellee. Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).
**EXHIBIT 21**

**ALEXANDER’S, INC.**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

 

731 Commercial Holding LLC

731 Commercial LLC

731 Office One Holding LLC

731 Office One LLC

731 Office Two Holding LLC

731 Office Two LLC

731 Residential Holding LLC

731 Residential LLC

731 Restaurant LLC

731 Retail One LLC

Alexander’s Department Stores of Brooklyn, Inc.

Alexander’s Department Stores of New Jersey, Inc.

Alexander’s Kings Plaza, LLC

Alexander’s of Kings, LLC

Alexander’s Management LLC

Alexander’s of Brooklyn II LLC

Alexander’s of Brooklyn, Inc.

Alexander’s of Flushing, Inc.

Alexander’s of Rego Park II, Inc.

Alexander’s of Rego Park III, Inc.

ALX of Paramus, LLC

Alexander’s Personnel Providers, Inc.

Alexander’s Rego Park Center, Inc.

Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc.

Alexander’s Restaurant LLC

Kings Parking, LLC

Kings Plaza Lender LLC

Ownreal Inc.

Rego Park Commercial LLC

Rego Park Residential LLC

Sakraf Wine & Liquor Store, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          25,964
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,884
<PP&E>                                           1,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                     384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,290
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           800
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,884
<SALES>                                         29,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,700
<CGS>                                           26,482
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   384
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,834
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .003


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 213 (Monday, November 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 87571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Fiscal Year 2024 Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Department of the Navy (DoN), Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DoN) announces the appointment of 
members to the DON Senior Executive Service (SES), Senior Level (SL), 
and Scientific and Professional (ST) Fiscal Year 2024 Performance 
Review Board (PRB). The purpose of the PRB is to provide fair and 
impartial review of the annual SES performance appraisal prepared by 
the senior executive's immediate and second level supervisor; to make 
recommendations to appointing officials regarding acceptance or 
modification of the performance rating; and to make recommendations for 
performance-based bonuses and performance-based pay increases.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Hanson, Director, Executive 
Management Program Office, Manpower and Reserve Affairs at 703-693-8896 
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5dedcd89bc19bddd4dbc6dadb9bd6dcc3f5c0c69bdbd4c3cc9bd8dcd9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dab1b3b7f4aef4b2bbb4a9b5b4f4b9b3ac9aafa9f4b4bbaca3f4b7b3b6">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Composition of the specific PRB is provided 
below:

Ms. E. Anne Sandel
Dr. Brett Seidle
Ms. Lisa St. Andre
Mr. Steven Parode
Dr. Bruce Danly
Mr. Thomas Rudowsky
Mr. Christopher Miller
Ms. Jennifer LaTorre
Ms. Deline Reardon
Ms. Catherine Kessmeier
Ms. Kate DeMane (HLR)
Ms. Jennifer Edgin (HLR)
Mr. Robert Hogue (Chair)

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4))

    Dated: October 29, 2024.
A.J. Gioiello,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-25520 Filed 11-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0139p.06 

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

J AE L EE , Petitioner-Appellant ,

v

.

U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA , Respondent-Appellee

. ┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ┘ 

### No. 14-5369

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. Nos. 2:09-cr-20011-1; 2:10-cv-02698—John T homas Fowlkes, Jr., District Judge. Decided and Filed: July 7, 2017
Before: NORRIS, BATCHELDER, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

_________________ ORDER

_________________ ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. In light of the S upreme Court’s decision in
Lee v. United States , No. 16-327, 2017 WL 2694701 (U.S. Ju ne 23, 2017), we hereby VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court. 

### >
RE: One more modeling question. and updates to Illinois' Lead Emissions Sprague, Jeff to

: Kaleel, Rob, Andy Chang Cc : "Sprague, Jeff", "Asselmeier, Buzz"

From: "Sprague, Jeff" <Jeff.Sprague@Illinois.gov> To: "Kaleel, Rob" <Rob.Kaleel@Illinois.gov>, Andy Chang/R5/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Sprague, Jeff" <Jeff.Sprague@Illinois.gov>, "Asselmeier, Buzz" <Buzz.Asselmeier@Illinois.gov> Andy, Yes, the modeling - related questions are fairly easy to answer: Ques tion #1: Was the air dispersion modeling based on potential or actual emission? Response: The U.S. Steel – Granite City Works emissions were based upon the facility’s reported actual emissions. Question #2: Were fugitive emissions or re - entrainment of dust factored into your modeling or analyses? If so, how were they considered? Response: Modeled fugitive lead emission sources included uncaptured Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) roof monitor emissions and coke battery door emissions. They were treated as volu me sources, and in total represented 17 discrete modeling input file entries. Lead emission estimates from “re - entrainment of dust” from roadways, stockpiles, or other traditional fugitive sources were not available for this facility, and thus not modeled. Recent chemical analyses of “grab samples” for slag crushing, coal pulverizing, and on - site roadway dust yielded results in which lead (Pb) was below instrument (XRF and ICPMS) detection levels. Jeff Sprague Air Quality Planning Section Illinois Environ mental Protection Agency 217 - 524 -4692 Jeff.Sprague@illinois.gov
October 21, 2015

Mr. John Desmedt

5099 Rock Springs Road

Warrenton, VA 20187

Dear Mr. Desmedt:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your June 16, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−3059, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       Jul-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                   789,000
<SECURITIES>                           1,139,000
<RECEIVABLES>                          6,542,000
<ALLOWANCES>                           1,376,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       8,797,000
<PP&E>                                 6,516,000
<DEPRECIATION>                         2,178,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        18,613,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  5,147,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   6,000
<OTHER-SE>                             6,869,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          18,613,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       5,546,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          4,289,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       147,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (9,049,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                           (777,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (8,272,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                         (8,272,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (1.50)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Enacted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 First Energy Metals Limited (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 (the “Report”). I, Gurminder Sangha, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Gurminder SanghaGurminder Sangha Chief Executive Officer July 29, 2022


---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Cummins

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on February 18, 2011 between Cummins and EPA

and included the following individuals:

Cummins: Jackie Yeager, Jon Dickson, Gary Salemme, and Brian Mormino

EPA: Byron Bunker and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused primarily on clarifications of the proposed regulatory language.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2,088,500
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,497,943
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    610,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,530,858
<PP&E>                                         448,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,885,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,580,936
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,910
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,197,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,885,900
<SALES>                                        8,002,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,002,979
<CGS>                                          1,703,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,703,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,139,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (54,365)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,198,046)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,198,046)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,198,046)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.36)
        


</TABLE>
Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-136638) pertaining to the American Community Properties Trust
      Employees' share incentive plan and to American Community Properties Trust
      Trustees' share incentive plan, of our report dated March 21, 2007, with respect
      to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of American Communities
      Properties Trust, incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
      for
      the year ended December 31, 2006.








/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





McLean,
      Virginia


March
      21,
      2007
Identificación

del producto

Palabra de advertencia

Identificación del proveedor

Indicaciones de peligro

Pictogramas de peligro

__

___

___

___

___

Líquido y vapores muy inflamables.Puede provocar daños al hígado y los riñones.

cerrado. 

do y cerrado 

pas o llama 

n chispas.

ones.

argas estáticas.

dor y receptor.

do se usa este 

anejar este 

ciones y los 

es e internacionales.

olvo químico 

l Centro de 

o: quitar de 

 la piel con agua.

Peso lleno:

__________ Número de lote:___________

Peso bruto:__________ Fecha de llenado:__________Fecha de caducidad:____________

Peligro

}

__

__

Instrucciones de uso______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Consejos de prudencia

} Información suplementaria

}

}

ETIQUETA DE MUESTRA

MUESTRA
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Enacted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Cream Minerals Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 (the Report).



I, Shannon M. Ross, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(iii)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(iv)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Shannon Ross

Shannon M. Ross

Chief Financial Officer



September 29, 2008