alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ELIZABETH THOMPSON *v*ELIJAH THOMPSON and others.

A mother, separated from her husband, is entitled to the custody of her infant child, in preference to the grandfather, into whose hands the child had been placed by the father soon after its birth.

Habeas coeptts, to obtain the custody of an infant child, heard by his Honor, *Judge*Logan, at Chambers, in Polk county, 17th September, 1873.

The plaintiff, who is the mother of the child, filed her petition for a writ of *habeas corpus,*which was granted, and the defendants directed to have the child before his Honor, &c.

On the hearing, it appeared that in August, 1872, the plaintiff gave birth to an infant daughter, (the child in question,) and was soon after attacked with “puerperal mania,” which rendered her totally delirious for several weeks, only occasionally having lucid moments. While she was in this condition, her mother requested Mrs. William Thompson, the mother-in-law of the plaintiff, to take the child and take care of it, and that the mother of the plaintiff would take and nurse her.

During the sickness and delirium of the plaintiff, her husband, the defendant, Elijah, accused his wife to her mother of improper conduct, and threatened to throw her “out in the road,” whereupon her mother took her to her house, where she has been ever since. She has recovered her mind and health, sufficient to work most of her time, though still feeble.

■The defendant, William Thompson, the father of Elijah, the husband, is a man of some means. Neither the father or mother of the child has much property. The maternal-grandmother of the child, with whom its mother, the plaintiff lives, is a widow with a large family, mostly grown, and limited means. Soon after the child was born, the father, the defendant Elijah, left and went to Georgia, where he remained nine months. He has since returned and is living with his father, the defendant William. .

His Honor directed that the custody of the child should be *33given to the grandfather, William Thompson. From this order, the plaintiff appealed.

*Shigp c& Bailey,*for appellant.

No counsel cont/ra, in this Court.

Reade, J.

In giving the custody of the child to the paternal grandfather, his Honor was influenced no doubt by the consideration that he was the most proper person under the circumstances; and we would affirm his action if we were permitted to do so, but the statute is express, that it shall be given either to the father or the mother. Bat. Rev. ch. 5é, section 39. There was formerly a statute which gave discretion to commit the custody to other fit person, but that has been repealed.

We declare that there is error in the order giving the custody of the child to the grandfather ; and that as the case now stands the mother, the petitioner, is entitled to the custody. The cause will be sent down to the Superior Court of Polk county, that proper orders may be made. The cost will be paid by William Thompson.

There is error. The cause is remanded to Polk Superior Court, and this opinion certified.

Pee Cueiam. Order reversed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2006**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|              |   |   |
|-------------------|--------|--------|
| February 26, 2007 |   |   | /s/ Joseph Macnow |
|              |   | Name:  | Joseph Macnow |
|              |   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|                   |        |        |  |  |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10417-S10418]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   UNANIMOUS-CONSENT REQUEST--S. 3150

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Commerce 
Committee be discharged from further consideration of S. 3150, the 
Access to Air Travel Act, that the bill be read a third time, passed, 
the motion to reconsider be laid on the table with no intervening 
action or debate, and that any statements relating to this matter 
appear at the appropriate place in the Record as if given.

[[Page S10418]]

  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Nelson of Nebraska). Is there objection?
  Mr. ALLARD. Mr. President, I object. There is objection on the 
Republican side.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.

                          ____________________
```
COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE


A.   Primary:  See the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in 
     Item 1.

B.   Full Dilution: The weighted average number of common shares
     outstanding was adjusted for the net effects of the exercise of stock
     options and warrants and the conversion of convertible debt and of
     preferred stock.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                               ------------------------------------
                                                     1997                 1996
                                               -----------------    ---------------
<S>                                            <C>                  <C>            
Net loss                                       $    (17,560,905)    $     3,987,517
Accumulated unpaid preferred dividends                        -           4,962,966
                                               -----------------    ---------------
     Net loss to common shareholders           $    (17,560,905)    $      (975,449)

Average common and common equivalent 
shares:

Average common shares outstanding per
  primary computation                                   717,526             423,909
Assuming conversion of preferred stock                   70,623                   -
Assuming conversion of convertible debt                 268,497                   -
Assuming exercise of stock options                      115,899              18,880
Assuming exercise of stock warrants                      61,550                   -
                                               -----------------    ---------------

Average common and anti-dilutive common
  equivalent shares as adjusted                       1,234,095             442,789
                                               -----------------    ---------------

Net loss per common share assuming full 
  dilution                                     $         (14.23)    $         (2.20)
                                               =================    ===============
</TABLE>


This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item
601(b)(11) of the Securities Exchange Act, although it is contrary to
paragraph 40 of APB Opinion No. 15 because it produces an anti-dilutive
result.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2008**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|              |   |   |
|-------------------|--------|--------|
| February 23, 2009 |   |   | /s/ Joseph Macnow |
|              |   | Name:  | Joseph Macnow |
|              |   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|                   |        |        |  |  |
August 6, 2012 

SCOTT WALKER 

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 

STATE OF WISCONSIN 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Essential Air Service Division 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 205~0 ___________ _ 

Attn: Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief Essential Air Service Division 

RE: Docket OST -2011-0109 Rhinelander, Wisconsin 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

DOT-OS.T- 2..0t \-0 \0'\ 

P.O. Box 7863 

MADISON, WI 53707 

The Rhinelander/Oneida county airport in Rhinelander, Wisconsin is requesting support from the 

Essential Air ServiCe (EAS) program. I am expressing support of Rhinelander's effort to acquire 

SkyWest Airline service. · · ' · ·· 

SkyWest Airlines would enhance capacity, provide accommodating jet service and needed air 

transportation for the region's air travelers including area businesses. Rhinelander has proven 

historically that the airport enplanes consistent and above average EAS passenger activity. The 

two round trips per day on the 50 seat Regional Jets would continue to keep Rhinelander 

connected to the world marketplace, to desired destinations and provide crucial business 

opportunities. 

Thank you for your consideration and support. 

cc: Robert G. Heck, Airport C:ommission Chair 

Mark Gottlieb, Wisconsin Department of Transportation Secretary • I 

WISCONSIN IS OPEN FOR BUSINESS 

www.wrsoov:sTAIE.wr.us • (608) 266-1212 ·FAX: (608) 267-8983
## Tronox Pigments (Savannah), Inc. **BA RT Exemption Modeling**  **Stack Data UTM East**  **UTM North Stack Height**  **Stack Diameter Exhaust Velocity**  **Exhaust Temperature Exhaust Flow**  **Stack ID Sources**  **Description Latitude** **Longitude (m)**  **(m) (ft)**  **(m) (ft)**  **(m) (ft/s)**  **(m/s) (F)**  **(K) (acfm)**  1024 2403 Chloride Finishing Line A Tanks32.08083381.029722 497179.3 3549184.8 60.0 18.29 1.0 0.30 25.0 7.62 75.0 297.04 1180.0

2405 Chloride Finishing Line B Tanks 1356 2404 Sulfuric Acid Plant 32.08305681.026667 497467.7 3549431.1 150.0 45.72 5.5 1.68 31.0 9.45 171.0 350.37 41121.0 Note: The "Chloride Finishing Line A Tanks" and "Chloride Finishing Line B Tanks" exhaust through the same stack. The "Chloride Finishing Line B Tanks" are not a BART-eligible source.

EPA-R04-OAR-2010-0936-DRAFT-0187.xls Stack Data 2/13/2012

### Tronox Pigments (Savannah), Inc. **BART Exemption Modeling Emission Source Data** 

**Stack ID Sources**  **Description Capacity**  **Units NOx**  **PM10 H2SO4**  **SO2 (tpy)**  **(lb/hr) (g/s)**  **(tpy) (lb/hr)**  **(g/s) (tpy)**  **(lb/hr) (g/s)**  **(tpy) (lb/hr)**  **(g/s)** 1024 2403Chloride Finishing Line A Tanks 5.14 ton/hr (pigment input) 0.094 2.1 0.48 0.06 2405Chloride Finishing Line B Tanks 5.14 ton/hr (pigment input) 0.094 2.1 0.48 0.06 1356 2404 Sulfuric Acid Plant 37.5 ton/hr (acid output) 0.174**See Notes** 0.15 4.0 28.6 6.53 0.82 24.6 5.63 0.71 24.6 5.63 0.71 657 150 18.9 Notes: **Emission Factors (lb/ton) NOx Emissions**  **PM10 Emissions SO2 Emissions**  **H2SO4 Emissions**

For the Sulfuric Acid Plant, it is assumed that PM10 emissions are equal to H2SO4 emissions. For modeling purposes, emissions of PM10 and H2SO4 are not additive. The emissions from "Chloride Finishing Line A Tanks" and "Chloride Finishing Line B Tanks" exhaust through the same stack. The "Chloride Finishing Line B Tanks" are not a BART-eligible source. Emissions data for the "Chloride Finishing Line B Tanks" are provided for information purposes only, and should not be incorporated into the BART exemption modeling runs for Stack ID 1024. For the Chloride Finishing Line A Tanks, PM10 emissions are conservatively assumed to be equal to PM emissions. PM emissions were estimated by scaling the PM emissions data reported in the annual emission statement for calendar year 2003. For the Sulfuric Acid Plant, NOx emissions are estimated based on an emission factor used in the annual emission statements. For the Sulfuric Acid Plant, SO2 and H2SO4 emissions are estimated based on the emission standards specified in 40 CFR 60 Subpart H (Standards of Performance for Sulfuric Acid Plants). The emission standards for SO2 and H2SO4 are 4.0 lb/ton and 0.15 lb/ton, respectively.

EPA-R04-OAR-2010-0936-DRAFT-0187.xls Emission Source Data 2/13/2012
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 159 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2195]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

[[Page E2195]]

                       SENATE COMMITTEE MEETINGS

  Title IV of Senate Resolution 4, agreed to by the Senate on February 
4, 1977, calls for establishment of a system for a computerized 
schedule of all meetings and hearings of Senate committees, 
subcommittees, joint committees, and committees of conference. This 
title requires all such committees to notify the Office of the Senate 
Daily Digest--designated by the Rules Committee--of the time, place, 
and purpose of the meetings, when scheduled, and any cancellations or 
changes in the meetings as they occur.
  As an additional procedure along with the computerization of this 
information, the Office of the Senate Daily Digest will prepare this 
information for printing in the Extensions of Remarks section of the 
Congressional Record on Monday and Wednesday of each week.
  Meetings scheduled for Thursday, October 2, 2008 may be found in the 
Daily Digest of today's Record.

                           MEETINGS SCHEDULED
                               OCTOBER 3
     9:30 a.m.
       Joint Economic Committee
         To hold hearings to examine the employment situation in 
           September 2008.
                                                            SD-106
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000926283
<NAME> JAMES CABLE FINANCE CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       9,706,473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,476,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,461
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,232,036
<PP&E>                                      87,899,710
<DEPRECIATION>                              73,699,922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,950,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,806,136
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (66,856,080)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,950,056
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,726,780
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,343,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (149,758)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,677,944
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,144,640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,144,640)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,144,640)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), theundersigned officer of Boston Restaurant Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledgeand belief, that:

 

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 22, 2006(the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialsrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: March 6,  2006 |   | /s/ Fran Ross            |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                       |   | Fran Ross                |
|                       |   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

Thiscertification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.

 

28

----
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 10.16


                     AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 2 (this "Amendment") to Amendment No.1 ("Amendment No. 1") to
the Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") dated as of March 1, 1999
by and between Harvey R. Blau (the "Executive") and Aeroflex Incorporated (the
"Company"), hereby amends Amendment No. 1, effective as of August 13, 2001, as
set forth below.

                  1. Paragraph 2 of Amendment No. 1 is hereby amended to read in
its entirety as follows:

                    "The Company shall credit each Deferred Amount to a
                    bookkeeping account in the name of the Executive (the
                    "Account") on the date the Deferred Amount would (absent
                    this Amendment) have been paid to the Executive. The Company
                    shall permit the Executive to file an Investment
                    Designation, as defined in Section 1.2 of the Company's Key
                    Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), and shall
                    credit to the Account earnings in accordance with such
                    Investment Designation and in accordance with and subject to
                    the terms and conditions of Section 2.2 of the Plan. The
                    Account shall be reduced as and to the extent distributions
                    are made from the Account pursuant to Sections 4, 6 and 7 of
                    Amendment No. 1."

                  2. Paragraph 7 of Amendment No. 1 is hereby amended to read in
its entirety as follows:

                    "Notwithstanding any other provision of Amendment No. 1, if
                    the Committee determines that it is possible for the Company
                    to pay the Executive all or any portion of the amounts
                    credited to his Account at a time when he is still employed
                    with the Company or any of its affiliates, without the
                    amount so paid being nondeductible by reason of Section
                    162(m), then subject to the approval of the Committee in its
                    sole and complete discretion, such amount may be paid to the
                    Executive."

                  3. Except as specifically provided in this Amendment, the
Employment Agreement and Amendment No. 1 are in all other respects ratified and
confirmed without amendment.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their
hands as of the date first above written.






<PAGE>



                                    AEROFLEX INCORPORATED


                                    By: /s/ Michael Gorin
                                       -----------------
                                    Name:  Michael Gorin
                                    Title: President


                                    /s/ Harvey Blau
                                    --------------------
                                    Harvey R. Blau


                                        2
---

**EXHIBIT 12.2**

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Martin Tutschek, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Forum National
  Investments Ltd.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
  untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
  to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
  as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
  that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
  during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
  period covered by this annual report based on such evaluations; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
  by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
  materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting:
  and

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
  based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
  of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
  or operation of internal control of financial reporting which are reasonably
  likely to affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
  report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
  or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
  controls over financial reporting;

|Date: December 22, 2006 | /s/
      *Martin Tutschek*                                
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Martin Tutschek, Chief Financial Officer and
      Director



---