alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In our capacities as Presidentand Chief Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofStressgen Biotechnologies Corporation (the “Company”) we hereby certify basedon our respective knowledge that: (a) the enclosed Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

February 19, 2004

 
| /s/Daniel L.  Korpolinski                                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel L.  Korpolinski                                              |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer                              |
|                                                                |
| /s/ Gregory  M. McKee                                               |   |
| Gregory M.  McKee                                                   |
| Vice  President, Corporate Development and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10808]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Clerk of the House of Representatives:

                                         House of Representatives,

                                          Office of the Clerk,

                                  Washington, DC, October 2, 2008.
     Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
     Speaker, House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to the permission granted in 
     Clause 2(h) of rule II of the Rules of the U.S. House of 
     Representatives, I have the honor to transmit a sealed 
     envelope received from the White House on October 2, 2008, at 
     3:30 p.m. and said to contain a message from the President 
     whereby he transmits a report on the continued production of 
     the naval petroleum reserves beyond April 5, 2009.
       With best wishes, I am
           Sincerely,
                                               Lorraine C. Miller,
     Clerk of the House.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit31.2**

 

I, Fran Ross, certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Boston Restaurant Associates, Inc.;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial information included in this report, and thefinancial statements on which the financial information is based, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statementsare required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted] for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b))  [omitted]

 

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report; and

 

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  December 3, 2003 | /s/ Fran Ross                 |   |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                              | Fran Ross, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2236-E2237]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               HONORING JEFF MILLER, FOUNDER OF HONOR AIR

                                  _____
                                 

                           HON. HEATH SHULER

                           of north carolina

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, October 3, 2008

  Mr. SHULER. Madam Speaker, I rise today to honor Jeff Miller, a small 
business owner and son of a World War II veteran from Hendersonville, 
North Carolina. Mr. Miller is one of the founders of Honor Air, which 
enables hundreds of World War II veterans the chance to travel to 
Washington, DC to see the National

[[Page E2237]]

World War II Memorial that was built to honor the 16 million Soldiers, 
Sailors, Marines, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Merchant Mariners who 
served our Nation during World War II.
  With the strong belief that everything good in his life is because of 
these courageous veterans, Mr. Miller began a campaign to send every 
World War II veteran from Henderson County to Washington, DC to see the 
memorial, which opened in 2004. World War II veterans who had not 
already been to the memorial and had physical or financial limitations 
were offered the chance to take the trip. The community came together 
to raise the money to fund the project. Many community groups, 
businesses and individuals contributed to this project, allowing these 
brave veterans to travel to Washington to see the memorial that was 
built in their honor. Mr. Miller, the Honor Air volunteers and 
contributors have all given something back to those for whom the debt 
can never be repaid. By the time it makes its last flight, 625 veterans 
from Hendersonville, NC will have made the Honor Air trip.
  Madam Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me today in expressing my 
appreciation and admiration for Jeff Miller, who made it possible for 
so many of our veterans to have the opportunity to see the National 
World War II Memorial.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.01



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

And Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b)



In connection with the Annual Report of Concur Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, S. Steven Singh, as President, Chief Executive Officer,
and Chairman of the Board of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:        December 22, 2003 |  | By |  | /s/    S. STEVEN
SINGH                                                      
|------------------------------- |  | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                |  |    |  | S. Steven
Singh President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board



This certification accompanies this
report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibit 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(File No. 333-68656) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-117941, 333-117536,333-105284, 333-62030, 333-44764, 333-42385 and 333-122607) of Affiliated Computer Services,Inc. of our report dated September 13, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPDallas, Texas
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert O'Brien, Principal Accounting Officer of Aberdeen Idaho Mining Company (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31,

2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with

the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial

condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  February 28, 2003

/s/Robert O'Brien

Robert O'Brien

Principal Accounting Officer
#### HENRY C. ELLISON vs. JAMES JONES.

j)_ executes to H, E. an instrument under seal in the following words: “ Five months after date I promise *to*pay H. E, the sum of $50 for a horse —said horse to be H. E.’s horse till paid for. *Held*that this was only a conditional sale of the horse, an<l riot an- absolute sale and a mortgage from the vendee to the vendor.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Randolph County, at Fall Term, 1843, his Honor Judge Manly presiding.

This action was brought to recover the value of a horse, taken and sold by the defendant as constable, under sundry executions against one Robert L. Dawson. The horse at the time of the seizure was in the possession of the said Dawson. The plaintiff, in the course of the trial, introduced a paper of the following tenor, viz :

“ Five months after date I promise to pay Henry Ellison the sum of fifty dollars for a horse — said horse to be said Henry Ellison’s horse till paid for, this 14th day of December, 1839.

Robert L. Dawson, (Seal.)

The counsel for the defendant contended that this instrument must be construed into a mortgage, and that it was void and inoperative for want of registration, and asked the court so to instruct the jury. The presiding lodge declined to give such instructions, but informed the jury that the paper seemed to be an undertaking on the part of Dawson to pay the money therein specified at the expiration of five months upon the consideration of his then having a title to the horse. And the paper in that sense,- was submitted to the jury to be considered with other evidence in ascertaining whether the horse was in good faith the property of the plaintiff. There was a verdict for the plaintiff under the charge of the court, and, a new trial having been moved for and refused, the defendant appealed.

*49No counsel for the plaintiff.

Mendenhall, *Morehead and Iredell*for the defendant.

Daniel-, J.

The horse in controversy had been the property of the plaintiff; and the instrument of writing-, which Dawson executed, declares that “ the said horsé is to be Henry Ellison’s horse till paid for.” These words were inserted, to repel any inference that might arise from the antecedent words in the instrument, that, the title to the horse had passed, and was executed in Dawson. The said words shew the understanding of the parties to be, that the contract was executory — but a conditional *sale.*There could have been no necessity for Ellison to have taken- a mortgage' o-n the horse to secure the price, unless there had been a prior absolute sale of the' horse to Dawson. We think that the instrument is only evidence of a conditional sale, and that it is not a mortgage and, therefore, did not require to be registered. Dawson’s possession of the horse was only a bailment by Ellison. The judgment must be affirmed,

Pee. Curiam* Judgment affirmed*
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Lodgian, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Edward J.
Rohling, the Chief Executive Officer and Linda Borchert Philp, the Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
our knowledge and after reasonable inquiry:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.





                                            LODGIAN, INC.

                            By:  /s/ EDWARD J. ROHLING
                                 ----------------------------------
                                            EDWARD J. ROHLING
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer

                       By: /s/ LINDA BORCHERT PHILP
                           ----------------------------------------------------
                                           LINDA BORCHERT PHILP
                           Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Date: March 15, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Lodgian, Inc. and will be retained
by Lodgian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 164 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10513]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         RECESS UNTIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2008, AT 12:30 P.M.

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 
Senate stands in recess until Tuesday, October 14, 2008, at 12:30 p.m.
  Thereupon, the Senate, at 11 and 14 seconds a.m., recessed until 
Tuesday, October 14, 2008, at 12:30 p.m.
```
#### DOE ON DEMISE OF DAVID PRICE *vs.*LOUISA OSBORNE.

jtVhere A. had leased land to B. for the year 1848, and during the year 1848, while B. was in possession under the lease, A. executed to C. a deed purporting to convey to him the fee simple, and thereupon, C., on the 25th of December, 1848, commenced an action of ejectment against B.; Held, that the action would not lie, because at the date of the demise, C. had not the right of entry.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Rockingham County at the Spring Term, 1851, his Honor Judge Bailey presiding.

• In this case tfie.ev-idence was, that the lessor of the plaintiff purchased the land, in dispute, as the property of Robert L. Osborn, husband of the defendant, at November Term, 1847, of Rockingham County Court, at sheiiff s sale, took *27a sheriff’s deed and bad the same duly recorded : That before Christmas, 1847, the lessor leased the said land to the said Robert L. Osborn, for the year 1848: That the-said Robert held over, and lived with the defendant; his wife, on the land, until the 5th day oí May, 1849, when the said husband died, and that the defendant, his widow, continued on the land until after she was served with a copy'' of the declaration in this case.

A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the Court, whether in case the said Robert L. Osborn, the husband, rented the land for the whole of the-year 1848, the demise as stated in the declaration being on-the 25th of December, 1848, and the ejectment being stated on the first day of January, 1849, the plaintiff could recover.

The Court being of opinion with the defendant, on the-point reserved, set aside the verdict, and ordered a non-suit.. From which judgment of non-suit, the lessor of the plaintiff prayed and obtained an appeal to the Supreme Court.

*J T. Morehead,*for the plaintiff.

*Kerr,*for the defendant.

Nash, J/

We concur with his Honor, before whom the-case was tried, and in the judgment he gave. The demise in the declaration is laid on the 25th of December, 1848. In the latter part of the year 1847, David Price, the lessor of the plaintiff, and who was the owner of the land, leased it to Robert L. Osborn tor the year 1848. Osborn entered into possession, and continued it during the whole of that year, and until some time in 1849, when he died, and the-defendant, his widow, continued on the land. On- the 26th of December, 1848, the date of the demise, R. L. Osborn, the lessee, was in possession of the premises, under his unexpired lease. His possession was a lawful one, and David Price, the lessor, had no right of entry, and without *28such right he could make no lease to the plaintiff. In ejectment, the lessor of the plaintiff must recover, upon the strength of his own title ; he must show a good title to the premises, *and a right of entry vested in him at the time of the demise,*otherwise he cannot recover. Brown ou actions, 466 — 1st Chit. PI. 880 — 2 Fast 250 — 13th East R. 210, 212.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
#### S. D. WAIT v. JOSEPH WILLIAMS.

*Aetion for Money Paid to Another’s Use.*

The defendant being indebted to an Insurance Company of which plaintiff" was agent, drew an order on A for the amount due, and went with-plaintiff to A, who paid a part of the order ; at defendant’s request, the-plaintiff thereupon advanced to the Company the balance due, and the-defendant left the order with him to collect the - balance due thereon and pay himself. The plaintiff used due diligence and failed to collect-it; *Held,*that the plaintiff is entitled to recover.

Civil Action tried at January Special Term, 1877, of Wake Superior Court, before *Schenck, J.*

This was an appeal from a judgment rendered by a J ustice-of the Peace in favor of the plaintiff. The facts appear in the opinion. His Honor upon the trial in the Court below gave judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed..

*Messrs. Busbee Susbee,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Merrimon, Fuller £ Ashe,*for defendant.

Reads, J.

The defendant was indebted to an Insurance: Company of which the plaintiff- was agent. The defendant drew an order on Jones & Co. for the amount, and the defendant and the plaintiff both together' went to Jones & Co. with the order, and Jones & Co. paid a part, and could not pay the whole. The plaintiff then, at the request of the defendant, advanced to the Insurance Company the balance which the defendant owed, and the defendant became indebted to the plaintiff individually, and not as agent, for the amount so advanced. And the defendant left the said order upon Jones & Co. with the plaintiff, with instructions to hold it and try to collect it out of Jones & Co., and with the proceeds pay himself. The plaintiff used due diligence to collect it, and failed, because Jones & Co. could not pay it.

*271Upon this state of facts there is not even a plausible reason why the plaintiff should not recover.

There is no error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
###### **EXHIBIT 23**

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM****               **

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of our reports dated February 21, 2010, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of Alexander’s, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alexander’s, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009:  

Registration Statement No. 333-151721 on Form S-8  

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-155727 on Form S-3

 

 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

 

Parsippany, New Jersey

February 22, 2010

 

----