alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DUNCAN McFADGEN and others v. J. T. COUNCIL and others.

*Bankruptcy*— Creditor’s *Right.*

A creditor proving his claim in bankruptcy does not waive his right of action in the state court against the bankrupt, where a discharge lias been refused or the proceedings determined without a discharge. This provision of the bankrupt act affects the remedy only, and applies to existing suits.

MotioN to dismiss the action heard at February Term, 1883, of The Supreme Court.

*Messrs. Merrimon & Fuller,*for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Hinsdale & Devereux,*for defendants.

Ruffin, J.

This cause has been standing for several terms upon exceptions to* the report of a referee, but a motion was made at the last term, and argued at this, to dismiss the plaintiffs’ suit, upon the ground that the principal defendant, John T. Council, has been adjudicated a bankrupt during its pen-dency, and the claim which is the subject of controversy has been proved against his estate in the bankrupt court, by the present holder thereof, thus waiving, as it is insisted, all right of action upon it in any other court.

In answer to the motion, the plaintiffs produce and rely upon a certified copy of the record of the bankrupt court, showing that *221the said defendant has been refused his discharge by that court, and that the proceedings therein have been determined without his having obtained the same.

This is an old equity suit, conducted upon bill and answer, according to the former system, and the more regular course for the defendants to have proceeded would have been by a petition in the cause, or a supplemental answer, rather than by motion. But waiving all question as to the mode of proceeding, the motion to dismiss must fail upon legal grounds.

As originally drawn, the 21st section of the bankrupt act left some doubt as to the right of creditors to sue upon their claims elsewhere than in the bankrupt court, in case the bankrupt failed to procure his discharge; and there were' several conflicting decisions in regard to the point. But with a view to render the law certain, that section was amended by the act of June 22, 1874, ch. 390, § 7, and it was expressly provided that “a creditor proving his claim shall not be held to have waived his right of action or suit against the bankrupt, when a discharge has been refused, or the proceedings have been determined without a discharge.” This being a provision that affects the remedy only, it applies to existing suits as well as any other, and it entirely removes all doubt as to the right of the plaintiffs to maintain their action. •

The defendants’ motion is therefore overruled at their costs ; and, understanding the defendants to say that they no longer insist upon their exceptions to the report, the same are overruled, and judgment will be entered here for the plaintiffs according to the report.

Per CuriaM. Judgment accordingly.
EXHIBIT 10(a)23

 

**BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS**

 

**THE SOUTHERN COMPANY**

 

Effective as of March 1, 2007, the following are the annual base salaries of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and certain other executive officers of The Southern Company.

 

| David M. Ratcliffe

President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                      | $1,075,700 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Thomas A. Fanning

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and

Treasurer                                            | $615,449   |
| Charles D. McCrary

Executive Vice President of the Company,

President and Chief Executive Officer of Alabama

Power Company  | $633,724   |
| Michael D. Garrett

Executive Vice President of the Company,

President and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia Power 

Company | $620,895   |
| W. Paul Bowers

Executive Vice President, Southern Company Services                                                            | $506,814   |
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00117-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JORGE LOUIS VERDE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 336th District Court

Fannin County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-12-24361

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State has appealed the trial court’s grant of Jorge Louis Verde’s motion to suppress 

evidence. Based on the reasoning and analysis in our opinion in cause number 06-13-00115-CR, 

issued on even date herewith, we affirm the trial court’s ruling. 

Jack Carter 

Justice

Date Submitted: March 5, 2014

Date Decided: April 23, 2014

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 32 (b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Richard H. Flake,
Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                            /s/ Richard H. Flake
                            --------------------
                            Richard H. Flake
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 8, 2005
      --------------
Pope and Laden estimates for SO2 

 12/14/2011 01:44 PM 

From: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US Sort List... 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ 

Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cortney, 

Bob Wayland asked me to respond to your question below. 

The inital estimates were based off of the dollar per ton estimate of 

$73,000 per ton of SO2 reduced in the east, from the "Laden" (Harvard 

based) study. The dollar per ton for the "Pope" (American Cancer 

Society) study is $29,000 per ton. 

Thus, the range of benefits estimates for the 670 tons of SO2 for the 

area sources is $19 million to $49 million, for 2016, reported in 2007 

dollars. 

Regards, 

Bryan 

Dr. Bryan J. Hubbell 

Leader, Risk and Benefits Group 

Health and Environmental Impacts Division 

U.S. EPA/OAQPS (C504-02) 

RTP, NC 27711 

(919) 541-0621 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Kevin 

Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/14/2011 12:17 PM 

Subject: RE: 30 vs 90 and area sources 

Hi Bob, 

Is that the Pope or Laden value of $73,000 per ton of SO2 reduced in the 

east? Can you provide us with the other value? 

Regards, 

Cortney
Denver – Region 

 

Dallas – Region 6

Eric Harbin 

Directorate of 

Construction 

Scott Ketcham

Deputy Assistant Secretary 

Amanda Edens 

Boston – Region 

New York – Region 

Richard Mendelson 

 

 

Seattle – Region 10

Dorinda Hughes

 

Directorate of 

Enforcement 

Programs 

Kim Stille 

 

Office of 

Communications 

Francis Meilinger 

Controlled 

Correspondence

Adrian Corsey 

Directorate of 

Technical Support 

and Emergency 

Management 

Lee Anne Jillings 

Directorate of 

Cooperative and 

State Programs 

Doug Kalinowski 

Directorate of 

Administrative 

Programs 

Kimberly Locey 

 

 

Directorate of 

Standards and 

Guidance 

Andrew Levinson 

Directorate of

Whistleblower 

Protection Programs 

Lee Martin

Tyrec Grooms

Assistant Secretary for 

Occupational Safety and Health

Douglas Parker 

Deputy Assistant Secretary 

 

James Frederick

Chief of Staff

Emily Hargrove

Philadelphia –

Region 3

Michael Rivera 

Atlanta – Region 4

Kurt Petermeyer 

Chicago – Region 5

William Donovan

Kansas City – 

Region

Billie Kizer

San Francisco –

Region 9

James Wulff

Senior Policy 

Advisor

Natalicia Tracy

OSHA Organizational Chart 

Policy Advisor
•

o

Douglas Parker, Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health 

Emily Hargrove, Chief of Staff 

- Francis Meilinger, Office of Communications

- Adrian Corsey, Controlled Correspondence

o Natalicia Tracy, Senior Policy Advisor

o Tyrec Grooms, Policy Advisor 

o James Frederick, Deputy Assistant Secretary 

- Andrew Levinson, Directorate of Standards and Guidance 

- Lee Anne Jillings, Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management

- Kimberly Locey, Directorate of Administrative Programs 

- Doug Kalinowski, Directorate of Cooperative and State Programs 

- Lee Martin, Directorate of Whistleblower Protection Programs 

o Amanda Edens, Deputy Assistant Secretary

- Galen Blanton, Boston – Region 1 

- Richard Mendelson, New York – Region 2 

- Michael Rivera, Philadelphia – Region 3

- Kurt Petermeyer, Atlanta – Region 4

- William Donovan, Chicago – Region 5 

- Eric Harbin, Dallas – Region 6 

- Billie Kizer, Kansas City – Region 7 

- Jennifer Rous, Denver – Region 8 

- James Wulff, San Francisco – Region 9 

- Dorinda Hughes, Seattle – Region 10 

- Kim Stille, Directorate of Enforcement Programs 

- Scott Ketchum, Directorate of Construction
。

户外与室内高温暴露都可能很危险。

自我保护与保护他人的方法

舒缓的进入工作状态。开工的第一个礼拜就会有将近四分之三的死亡因暑热疾病所导致。

100% ✓

J

新聘员工和返岗职员需要建立耐热性(适应环境)并勤密的小休。

遵循20%原则。工作的第一天,高温天气竭力劳动不超过班时数的百分之20。然后照一天

不超过20%的竭力劳动时长状况直到雇员们适应高温天气劳动。

清凉饮用水

即便不觉得口渴也要饮用凉水,至少每20

分钟—杯。

采取休憩

根据气温、湿度和环境清况,确保用充沛

的时间达到降温效果。

寻找阴凉处

在指定的有遮蔽和阴凉处的位置进行休息。

防暑衣着

戴上帽子和尽可能穿着浅色、松身以及通的

爽的衣物和透气的服装。

大家互相关注

监测自己和他人的暑热的疾病症状。

如果戴了面罩

一旦面罩变湿或弄脏,请及时更换。经常互

相口头询问。

暑热疾病急救

紧急就医症状如下!

·

·

·

.

思维或行为失常的

口齿不清的

癫病

丧失意识

G) 1 )> 立即致电911

@2 )> 在动脉位置放置冰袋进行降温(颈两侧、腋

下、大腿近骨盆的位置、后脚踝)的

@3 )> 在旁陪护,直到医护人员到达

注意观察暑热疾病的其他症状,井及时采取行动。有疑问时,请致电911。

如果工人出现以下症状:的

头痛或恶心

虚弱或眩晕

大量出汗,或皮表温感热及干

燥温度高,干燥

体温异常高

口渴

排尿量减少

应采取以下措施:

 给工人饮用含有盐分的凉水

 除去不必要的衣物

 移动到更凉爽的区域

 用水、冰块或风扇降温

 不要离开患者不管

 安排就医

职业安全和

健康管理局

更多信息:1-800-321-0SHA (6742) 

哑盲热线1-877-889-5627 www.osha.gov/heat

联邦法律赋予您安全工作场所的权利。您有权声明职场相关安全与健康危害危害所在,而

不用担心被报复。请查阅职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA) 的网站 www.osha.gov/workers 有关如何

向 OSHA 提出保密投诉并要求检查的信息。

OSHA 4211-02 2023
commitment to workplace safety to reduce the number of workplace fatalities, accidents, and illnesses. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Michael L. Parson, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, 

WHEREAS, Missouri workers build our homes, roads, schools, and hospitals; provide food 

for our families; provide care to the sick and injured; create goods; and provide services for people 

around the world; and 

WHEREAS, their work improves our families, communities, and our great state; and 

WHEREAS, it is a tragedy when a mother, father, sister, brother, or child goes to work and 

not return home and a family's loss is immeasurable; and 

WHEREAS, Missourians lose their lives each year on the job while others suffer injuries and 

illnesses; and 

WHEREAS, we gather each year to honor the memory of Missouri's fallen workers and 

rededicate our efforts to improve safety and health in every workplace in the state; and 

WHEREAS, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) shall continue its 

do hereby proclaim April 28, 2023, to be 

WORKERS' MEMORIAL DAY 

in Missouri, and ask all Missourians to remember, salute, thank, and honor Americans who have been 

injured or lost their lives while on the job and hereby proclaim that all citizens have the right to come 

home safely and healthy at the end of their workday. 

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the Great 

Seal of the State of Missouri, in the City of Jefferson, this 10th day of March, 2023.
DOCUMENTATION CHECKLIST FOR BASELINE OR TIER 1 EVALUATIONS 

CH AND RH WASTE – STEP 1

Revision 1    April 15, 2013

Name for Tier 1 Evaluation Request: 

Documents Provided with Request: 

Neededa Documents 

Provided to EPA [indicate 

document name, source 

document #, or N/A)]b

 AK Summary Report 

 Radiological Characterization Technical Report (RH only) 

 Certification Plan (RH only) 

 Confirmation Test Plan (RH only) 

 Sampling Plan and Post Sampling Memorandum 

 QA Equivalency Document, Peer Review, Corroborating Data 



Batch Data Reports (BDRs) or BDR eqivalents of fully 

characterized containers or list of available BDRs if total 

available is extensive (NDA, DTC, VE, RTR, sampling, 

analytical, etc.), indicating how many have been through SPM 

&/or Project Level review 

 



List of all applicable procedures and SOPs, including but not 

limited to: AK, VE and/or RTR, NDA, DTC, laboratory 

sampling and analysis procedures (indicate applicable 

revisions and if the applicable revision has been superseded) 

 

 CCP-TP-005 Attachments: 

 Attachment 1 (AK Documentation checklist) 

 Attachment 4 (AK Information List) 

a – All documents marked with “” are required for EPA’s review if applicable to this T1 request. 

b – Use Notes box below if additional space is needed. 

Notes or Additional Documents Provided:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; CTSA Collaborative and Innovative Acceleration Award (CCIA) Review.                    

*Date:*                         February 20, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jing Chen, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Suite 1E504, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-3268,                         *chenjing@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 30, 2024.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-25649 Filed 11-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 33449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13674]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

DOE/NSF High Energy Physics Advisory Panel

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the DOE/NSF High Energy 
Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP). The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these 
meetings be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Monday, August 27, 2012; 9:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Tuesday, August 
28, 2012; 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hilton Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Kogut, Executive Secretary; High 
Energy Physics Advisory Panel; U.S. Department of Energy; SC-25/
Germantown Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585-1290; Telephone: 301-903-1298.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and guidance on a continuing 
basis to the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation 
on scientific priorities within the field of high energy physics 
research.
    Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following:

Monday, August 27, 2012 and Tuesday, August 28, 2012

     Discussion of Department of Energy High Energy Physics 
Program.
     Discussion of National Science Foundation Elementary 
Particle Physics Program.
     Reports on and Discussions of Topics of General Interest 
in High Energy Physics.
     Public Comment (10-minute rule).
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of these items on the agenda, you should 
contact John Kogut by telephone: 301-903-1298 or email at: 
John.Kogut@science.doe.gov. You must make your request for an oral 
statement at least 5 business days before the meeting. Reasonable 
provision will be made to include the scheduled oral statements on the 
agenda. The Chairperson of the Panel will conduct the meeting to 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public comment will follow 
the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available on the High 
Energy Physics Advisory Panel's Web site at: http://science.energy.gov/hep/hepap/.

LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-13674 Filed 6-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 488 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 488

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the taxation of 
                       social security benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 1999

   Mr. Grams introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the taxation of 
                       social security benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TAXATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

    Section 86 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social 
security and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) Termination.--This section shall not apply to taxable years 
beginning after December 31, 1998.''
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. WILLIS YARBOROUGH.

*Indictment-Poisoning*— Defective *Indictment.*

An indictment for administering poison (strychnia) with intent to kill, which does not contain an averment that the defendant “well knew that the said strychnia was a deadly poison,” is fatally defective,

INDICTMENT for administering Poison with intent to kill, tried at Spring Term, 1877, of Geanville Superior Court, before *Buxton, J.*

The jury rendered a verdict of guilty and the defendant moved in arrest of judgment; for that the bill did not charge that the defendant administered the poison knowingly and secretly. His Honor overruled the motion and the defendant appealed.

*Attorney (general,*for the State.

. *Messrs. Oeo. Wortham,*and *Merrimon, Fuller Ashe,*for the defendant.

Bynum, J.

The defendant was indicted and convicted of administering poison to William Mills, with intent to kill; and he now moves in arrest of judgment for defects in the bill of indictment.

The bill charges that the defendant on a certain day, “feloniously and unlawfully did administer to William Mills a large quantity of a certain deadly-poison, called strychnia; to-wit, two drachms, with intent, &c.,” omitting the averment that he “ then and there well knew that the said strychnia was a deadly poison,” &c.

The precedents all contain this averment either in express terms or in substance and effect. Eor example here- is one from Chitty, for sending poison with intent to kill: “That *525G. L., late &c., not having &c., but being moved and seduced &c., and of his malice aforethought, contriving and intending, the said A. B., with poison, feloniously to kill and murder, on &c., with force and arms at &c., aforesaid, a great quantity of yellow arsenic,1 being a deadly 'poison, with a certain quantity of white wine, feloniously, wilfully and of his malice aforethought, did mix and mingle, he the said G. L. then and there, *well knoioing the said yellow arsenic to he a deadly poison, &c.”*Chit. Cr. L. 776; *State*v. *Blandy,*18. Howell’s State Trials, 1118.

It is always safest to follow long approved precedents. Strychnia is a technical term, used and well known in the *Materia Medica*as descriptive of a deadly poison, but this poison with its technical name is of recent discovery, and though generally, may not be universally known among the laity as a deadly poison, and its administration to another without this knowledge of its deadly effects may not necessarily be a crime. Hence there should be an averment that the accused knew it -to be a deadly poison.

There is error.

Per Curiam. Judgment arrested.