86242 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

This rule has not been designated a 

‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under 

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as 

amended by Executive Order 14094 

(Modernizing Regulatory Review). 

Accordingly, it has not been reviewed 

by the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB). 

This regulatory action determination 

is based on the ability that vessels can 

still transit the bridge given 3 hours 

advanced notice. 

B. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 

(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires federal agencies to consider the 

potential impact of regulations on small 

entities during rulemaking. The term 

‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

While some owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit the bridge 

may be small entities, for the reasons 

stated in section V.A above, this rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on any vessel owner or operator. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule 

would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule calls for no new collection 

of information under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Government 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01, Rev.1, 

associated implementing instructions, 

and Environmental Planning Policy 

COMDTINST 5090.1 (series) which 

guide the Coast Guard in complying 

with the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321– 

4370f). The Coast Guard has determined 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This rule 

promulgates the operating regulations or 

procedures for drawbridges and is 

categorically excluded from further 

review, under paragraph L49, of 

appendix A, table 1 of DHS Instruction 

Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. 

Neither a Record of Environmental 

Consideration nor a Memorandum for 

the Record are required for this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 

Bridges. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 117 as follows: 

PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE 

OPERATION REGULATIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 117 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 

DHS Delegation No. 00170.1. Revision No. 

01.3 

■ 2. In § 117.801: 

■ a. Paragraph (d) is stayed; and 

■ b. Paragraph (h) is added. The 

addition reads as follows: 

§ 117.801 Newtown Creek, Dutch Kills, 

English Kills, and their tributaries. 

* * * * * 

(h) The draw of the Hunters Point 

Avenue Bridge, mile 1.4, across Dutch 

Kills at Queens, may be maintained in 

the closed to navigation position until 

July 1, 2025. 

M.E. Platt, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 

First Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2024–24970 Filed 10–29–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2024–0970] 

RIN 1625–AA87 

Security Zone; Corpus Christi Ship 

Channel, Corpus Christi, TX 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a temporary moving 

security zone for navigable waters 

within a 500-yard radius of a certain 

vessel carrying cargo requiring an 

elevated level of security in the Corpus 

Christi Ship Channel and the La Quinta 

Channel. The temporary security zone is 

needed to protect the vessel, the cargo, 

and the surrounding waterway from 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 86243 

terrorist acts, sabotage, or other 

subversive acts, accidents, or events of 

a similar nature. Entry of vessels or 

persons into this zone is prohibited 

unless specifically authorized by the 

Captain of the Port, Sector Corpus 

Christi or a designated representative. 

DATES: For the purposes of enforcement, 

actual notice will be used from October 

24, 2024, until October 30, 2024. This 

rule is effective without actual notice 

from October 30, 2024 until November 

1, 2024. 

ADDRESSES: To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to https://

www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024– 

0970 in the search box and click 

‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type 

column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related 

Material.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions about this rule, call 

or email Lieutenant Tim Cardenas, 

Sector Corpus Christi Waterways 

Management Division, U.S. Coast 

Guard; telephone 361–939–5130, email 

Tim.J.Cardenas@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COTP Captain of the Port, Sector Corpus 

Christi 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

II. Background Information and 

Regulatory History 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

temporary rule under the authority in 5 

U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This provision 

authorizes an agency to issue a rule 

without prior notice and opportunity to 

comment when the agency for good 

cause finds that those procedures are 

‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that 

good cause exists for not publishing a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

with respect to this rule because it is 

impracticable. The Coast Guard must 

establish this security zone by October 

24, 2024, to ensure security of this 

vessel and the surrounding area and 

lacks sufficient time to provide a 

reasonable comment period and to 

consider those comments before issuing 

the rule. 

Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 

Guard also finds that good cause exists 

for making this rule effective less than 

30 days after publication in the Federal 

Register. Delaying the effective date of 

this rule would be contrary to the public 

interest because quick action is needed 

to provide for the security of this vessel 

and its surroundings while it is in 

transit. 

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

security zone regulation under the 

authority in 46 U.S.C. 70051 and 70124. 

The Captain of the Port, Sector Corpus 

Christi (COTP) has determined that 

potential hazards are associated with 

the transit of the Motor Vessel (M/V) 

KITHNOS. There is a security concern 

within a 500-yard radius of the vessel 

when it is loaded and when it is 

transiting while loaded. This rule is 

needed to provide for the safety and 

security of the vessel, its cargo, and the 

surrounding waterway from terrorist 

acts, sabotage, or other subversive acts, 

accidents, or other events of a similar 

nature while the vessel is transiting 

within Corpus Christi, TX. 

IV. Discussion of the Rule 

The Coast Guard is establishing a 500- 

yard radius, temporary, moving security 

zone around M/V KITHNOS. Other 

mariners and vessels will be able to 

identify the security zone because of the 

M/V KITHNOS’s name, clearly marked 

on its stern, and port and starboard 

sides. The zone for the vessel will be 

effective and enforced from October 24, 

2024, through November 1, 2024, when 

the vessel is loaded with cargo and 

transiting the Corpus Christi Ship 

Channel and La Quinta Ship Channel to 

protect the vessel, its cargo, and the 

surrounding waterways from terrorist 

acts, sabotage, or other subversive acts, 

accidents, or other events of a similar 

nature while the vessel is traveling 

within the Corpus Christi Ship Channel 

and La Quinta Ship Channel. 

No vessel or person will be permitted 

to enter the security zone without 

obtaining permission from the COTP or 

a designated representative. As used in 

this section, ‘‘designated representative’’ 

means a Coast Guard Patrol 

Commander, including a Coast Guard 

coxswain, petty officer, or other officer 

operating a Coast Guard vessel and a 

Federal, State, and local officer 

designated by or assisting the Captain of 

the Port, USCG Sector Corpus Christi 

(COTP) in the enforcement of the 

security zone. Persons or vessels 

desiring to enter or pass through each 

zone must request permission from the 

COTP or a designated representative on 

VHF–FM channel 16 or by telephone at 

361–939–0450. If permission is granted, 

all persons and vessels must comply 

with the instructions of the COTP or 

designated representative. The COTP or 

a designated representative will inform 

the public through Broadcast Notices to 

Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to 

Mariners (LNMs), and/or Marine Safety 

Information Bulletins (MSIBs) as 

appropriate for the enforcement times 

and dates for the security zone. 

V. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

Executive Orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes and 

Executive Orders, and we discuss First 

Amendment rights of protestors. 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

This rule has not been designated a 

‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under 

Executive Order 12866, as amended by 

Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing 

Regulatory Review). Accordingly, this 

rule is not subject to review by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). 

This regulatory action determination 

is based on the size, duration, and 

location of the security zone. This rule 

will impact a small, designated area of 

500-yards around the moving vessel in 

the Corpus Christi Ship Channel and La 

Quinta Ship Channel as the vessel 

transits these channels over a nine-day 

period. Most vessels will be able to 

move around the security zone and 

therefore the impediment to the 

movement of other vessels will be 

minimal. Moreover, the rule allows 

other vessels to seek permission to enter 

the zone. 

B. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 

1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires Federal agencies to consider 

the potential impact of regulations on 

small entities during rulemaking. The 

term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

While some owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit the 

temporary security zone may be small 

entities, for the reasons stated in section 

V.A above, this rule will not have a 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
86244 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 

significant economic impact on any 

vessel owner or operator. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule 

would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the National Government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have Tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

Tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian Tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian Tribes. If you 

believe this rule has implications for 

federalism or Indian Tribes, please 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 

above. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Directive 023–01 and Environmental 

Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f) and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a 

moving security zone lasting for the 

duration of time that the M/V KITHNOS 

is within the Corpus Christi Ship 

Channel and La Quinta Channel while 

loaded with cargo. It will prohibit entry 

within a 500-yard radius of the M/V 

KITHNOS while the vessel is transiting 

loaded within Corpus Christi Ship 

Channel and La Quinta Ship Channel. It 

is categorically excluded from further 

review under L60(a) in Appendix A, 

Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023– 

01–001–01, Rev. 1. A record of 

Environmental Consideration 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket. For instructions 

on locating the docket, see the 

ADDRESSES section of this preamble. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places, or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 70124; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0970 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T08–0970 Security Zones; Corpus 

Christi Ship Channel. Corpus Christi, TX. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

moving security zone: All navigable 

waters encompassing a 500-yard radius 

around the M/V KITHNOS while the 

vessel is in the Corpus Christi Ship 

Channel and the La Quinta Ship 

Channel. 

(b) Enforcement period. This section 

will be enforced during the time the 

ship is loaded and docked, and while 

loaded and underway. 

(c) Regulations. (1) The general 

security zone regulations in subpart D of 

this part, you may not enter the security 

zone described in paragraph (a) of this 

section unless authorized by the COTP 

or the COTP’s designated representative. 

A designated representative is a 

commissioned, warrant, or petty officer 

of the U.S. Coast Guard assigned to 

units under the operational control of 

USCG Sector Corpus Christi. 

(2) Persons or vessels desiring to enter 

or pass through the zones must request 

permission from the COTP Sector 

Corpus Christi on VHF–FM channel 16 

or by telephone at 361–939–0450. 

(3) If permission is granted, all 

persons and vessels must comply with 

all lawful orders and directions of the 

COTP or the COTP’s designated 

representative. 

(d) Information broadcasts. The COTP 

or a designated representative will 

inform the public through Broadcast 

Notices to Mariners (BNMs), Local 

Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/or 

Marine Safety Information Bulletins 

(MSIBs) as appropriate of the 

enforcement times and dates for this 

security zone. 

Dated: October 23, 2024. 

T.H. Bertheau, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Sector Corpus Christi. 

[FR Doc. 2024–25199 Filed 10–29–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1