alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENTS  FOR THE NINE MONTHS  ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925666
<NAME> WOODLAKE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          906
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,727)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  45
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (45)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (45)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (45)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 25, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 539 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-162, K2025-160.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25311 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Realty Investment Company, Respondent, vs. Miller and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Carl H. Boye*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Carl W. Danhouser*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request To Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 496 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-113, K2025-111.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25249 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SCANTEK
MEDICAL INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         186,722
<SECURITIES>                                 6,351,421
<RECEIVABLES>                                  875,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,471,578
<PP&E>                                         809,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,049,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,659,893
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,220
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,372,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,049,993
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,923,535
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,059,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             138,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                864,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            864,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   864,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

                   COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

A.  Primary: See the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in
    Item 1.

B.  Full Dilution: The weighted average number of common shares
    outstanding was adjusted for the net effects of the exercise of stock
    options and warrants and the conversion of convertible debt and
    preferred stock.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                          1997              1996

<S>                                                   <C>              <C>          
Net loss                                              $(44,262,740)    $   (727,119)
Less accumulated unpaid preferred dividends                235,126        6,144,668
                                                      ------------     ------------
    Net loss to common shareholders                   $(44,497,866)    $ (6,871,787)
                                                      ============     ============

Average common and common equivalent shares:

Average common shares outstanding per primary
    computation                                            721,250          426,378
Assuming conversion of preferred stock                      72,208             --
Assuming conversion of convertible debt                    268,497             --
Assuming exercise of stock options                         117,740           16,698
Assuming exercise of stock warrants                         61,550             --
                                                      ------------     ------------
Average common and anti-dilutive common
    equivalent shares as adjusted                        1,241,245          443,076
                                                      ============     ============

Net loss per common share assuming full dilution      $     (35.85)    $     (15.51)
                                                      ============     ============
</TABLE>


This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item
601(b) (11) of the Securities Exchange Act, although it is contrary to
paragraph 40 of APB Opinion No. 15 because it produces an anti-dilutive
result.
Exhibit 10.R
  Personal and Confidential
 
   
    
    Salary: $900,000 per annum
    
    Annual bonus opportunity: Target 100% of salary; maximum 200% of salary
    
    Stock Options: a grant of 1,000,000 options effective on the start date of your
employment. The options will time vest pro-rata over a five-year period.
    
    Restricted Stock: A grant of restricted common stock will be made to you effective on
the start date of your employment, which shall have both time and performance vesting
provisions. Specifically, you will be granted 200,000 shares of restricted stock on your
start date. On October 1, 2004, the number of shares of restricted stock may be adjusted
based upon a performance vesting criteria. The performance vesting criteria and the
number of shares of restricted stock to which you will be entitled will be based upon a
comparison of the Companys performance to a peer group for the period from October 1,
2003 through September 30, 2004 (the Performance Period) as follows:
 st  nd  rd  th




---



##### 



Sign-on Bonus
 Severance Policy
 Change of Control
 Employee Benefits
 Home Security
 Life Insurance
    
 By:
    
    Ronald L. Kuehn, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
On Behalf of the Board of Directors




---



##### 



/s/ Douglas L. FosheeDouglas L. FosheeDate:       07/15/03
[Cite as State v. Meadows, 2015-Ohio-3117.] 

 

Criminal Appeal From: Hamilton County Municipal Court 

 

Judgment Appealed From Is: Reversed and Cause Remanded 

Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal: August 5, 2015 

Paula Boggs Muething, City Solicitor, Heidi Rosales, City Prosecutor, and Jennifer 

Bishop, Assistant City Prosecutor, for Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 

Raymond T. Faller, Hamilton County Public Defender, and David Hoffmann, 

Assistant Public Defender, for Defendant-Appellant. 

Please note: we have removed this case from the accelerated calendar. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO 

STATE OF OHIO, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 vs. 

MORTIZE MEADOWS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

:

: 

: 

: 

: 

APPEAL NO. C-140593 

TRIAL NO. 14CRB-8751 

O P I N I O N.
OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

2 

MOCK, Judge. 

{¶1} Defendant-appellant Mortize Meadows was convicted, after a bench 

trial, of one count of misdemeanor domestic violence in violation of R.C. 2919.25. 

While Meadows raises four assignments of error on appeal, we address only his 

fourth assignment of error as it is dispositive. 

{¶2} Meadows claims that the trial court improperly conducted a bench 

trial to determine his guilt. We agree. Meadows filed a written demand for a jury 

trial, and no subsequent written jury waiver appears in the record. This court has 

held that “[o]nce the demand for a jury trial has been filed in a petty offense case, the 

trial judge may not proceed to try the defendant without a jury unless the defendant 

makes a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver of his right to a jury trial, and that 

waiver is made a part of the record pursuant to R.C. 2945.05.” State v. Pflanz, 135 Ohio 

App.3d 338, 339, 733 N.E.2d 1212 (1st Dist.1999), citing State v. Tate, 59 Ohio St.2d 50, 

391 N.E.2d 738 (1979). Absent strict compliance with the requirements of R.C. 2945.05, 

a trial court lacks jurisdiction to try the defendant without a jury. State v. Pless, 74 Ohio 

St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766 (1996), paragraph one of the syllabus. 

{¶3} Since no jury waiver was filed, the trial court was without jurisdiction to 

conduct a bench trial. We sustain Meadows’s fourth assignment of error, reverse the 

judgment of the trial court, and remand the cause for either a jury trial or a bench trial 

after the proper execution of a jury waiver pursuant to R.C. 2945.05. His remaining 

assignments of error are made moot by our disposition of the fourth assignment of 

error. 

Judgment reversed and cause remanded. 

CUNNINGHAM, P.J., and STAUTBERG, J., concur. 

Please note: 

 The court has recorded its own entry on the date of the release of this opinion.
#### The State, ex rel. McDonald, v. De Kruif et al. (Two cases.) The Same v. Ellis & Slatterly et al. The Same v. Wing & Beckwith. The Same v. Coad et al. The Same v. Christainy et al. The Same v. Leland et al. The Same v. Kelly & Co. et al.

1. Intoxicating Liquors: actions for penalties on bonds op persons HOLDING PERMITS: MOTION TO DISMISS: NUMEROUS GROUNDS considered. Actions by a citizen, as relator, to recover upon bonds of persons bolding permits to sell intoxicating liquors, for penalties incurred by a violation of the law. Motions to dismiss, and to strike the petitions from the files, were made, based on numerous grounds not set out in the opinion; but *held*that some of these grounds, questioning the right of a private citizen to maintain such actions, were not well taken; following *State v.*Martland, 71 Iowa, 543, and that others of them, while they might be good on demurrer or answer, were not good as grounds for dismissing the actions or striking the petitions from the files.

*489*Appeal from Sioux Cvreioit Court*— Host. D. D. MoOallum, *Judge.*

Saturday, October 8.

*Zink & Gosselin,*and *Cole, Mc Vey & Clark,*for appellant.

*Burke & Hewitt, Wm. Hutchinson, Argo & McDuffie,*and *W. H. Palmer,*for appellees.

*Per curium.*

These cases involve substantially the same question as the case of *State, ex rel. Hinkley, v. Martland,*71 Iowa, 543. Counsel for appellee claim that there are other questions in these cases, and they filed additional abstracts in which they show that there were other grounds of the motion to dismiss than those set out in appellant’s abstract. They urge that as no errors are assigned on 'these other grounds,- the appeal cannot be entertained because it will be presumed that the circuit court based its decision upon some ground not assigned as error.

Whatever the rule may be ordinarily as to the necessity of assigning errors on all the grounds of a motion, we need not now determine, because these additional grounds of the motion do not appear to us to be proper by way of demurrer or answer. They are not proper as grounds of a motion to dismiss.

Following the case above cited, the judgment of dismissal in these cases will be

Reversed.
04/22/201 0 12:4 9 FA X 81 4 53 6 702 4 S T FRANCI S CHURC H 12100 2 

## Airlin e fo r Johnstown , P

A- Yahoo ! Mail Pag e 1 of 1 

# "VXHOOf ^

MAI L Oo-r-osT - ^oo-^ - u^S \ Airlin e fo rJohnstown , P AThursday , Apri l 22 , 201 0 12:3 9 P M From : "AnLhoii ySpilka " <podusn®yaf»oo.rom > To : EAS(g)dot,po

v TO WHO M I TMA YCONCERN : "Financia l decision " fo rwhom ? Certainl yno t Joh n Q . Publi cwh o wil l stil l hav e t o driv e t o PI To rBW I o rSC E instea d o fusin g JS Tbecaus e o fth e muc h highe rfare s ou t o fJS Twit h Golga n Air/Unite d Expres s I hav e sen t letter s t o th e edito ri n regar d t o th e highe rfares , th e inconvenien t schedule s ( I onc e tried t o flyt o Wilmington , N C fro m JS Tonl yt o fin d tha t whateve rfligh t I selecte d (o fth e 3 a t tha t time ) I ha d t o slee p ove ra t som e hu b an d woul d arriv e th e followin g day . Now , wh ywoul d i wan t t o d o that ? I hav e foun d th e schedule s t o b e atrocious . Th e fare s ar e usuall y$20 0 - 60 0 differen t tha n fro m PI To rBWI . I agre e tha t th e convenienc e o fsecurity , parkin g an d a moder n facilit y(althoug h ther e i s n o longe ra restauran t available ) i s enticin g bu t no t t o payth e ridiculou s far e differences . I fth e decisio n i s mad e t o Kee p Colga n Ai rI woul d hop e tha t thei rarm s coul d b e twiste d t o reduc e fare s (a s thei rarms wer e twiste d t o ad d a fe wextr a flight s t o accomodat e busines s travelers ) whic h i s no t improvin g th e situatio n o fa los s o fleisur e travelers , A s a matte ro ffact , th e articl e indicate d tha t th e adde d flight s di d no t se e a significan t increas e o fbusines s travelers . So.,.a m I th e onl yleisur e travele rtha t i s annoyed ? Th e financial decisio n tha t th e 2 airport authoritie s mad e i s certainl yno t fo rth e travele rwh o woul d lik e t o trave l ou t o fJS Tbu t won' t payth e exorbitan t fares . Anthon yF . Spilk a Johnstown , PA(wh o shoul d probabl yhav e stock s i n th e PI Tairport) .

C 3



## http://us.inc577.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMtd=0&fid=Sent&filterBy=*&,rand"l.. . 4/22/201 0
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Jacob Brendle, Appellant.

Appeal: transcript: review.

*Appeal from Pollc District Court.*

Wednesday, October 29, 1890.

Per Curiam.

On appeal to the district court, the defendant was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of law. His motion for new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and that the court erred in admitting and refusing evidence, and in the instructions given, was overruled, and judgment entered upon the verdict. Defendant appeals.

The case is submitted upon a partial transcript that does not include the evidence or the instructions, and without briefs or arguments. Without the evidence and instructions before us, we cannot determine whether the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial. We do not discover any error in the record, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                                      0001064116
<NAME>                                     MEDIACOM LLC
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,473
<SECURITIES>                                     8,794
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                       772
<INVENTORY>                                     12,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         700,696
<DEPRECIATION>                               (101,693)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,265,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,615
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,265,926
<SALES>                                        176,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,052
<CGS>                                           58,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  214,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (77,522)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (77,522)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (77,522)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>