alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 651 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 651

 To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to modify the 
            provisions relating to citations and penalties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 1999

 Mr. Wellstone (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to modify the 
            provisions relating to citations and penalties.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wrongful Death Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. OSHA CRIMINAL PENALTIES.

    Section 17 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 
U.S.C. 666) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)--
                    (A) by striking ``fine of not more than $10,000'' 
                and inserting ``fine in accordance with section 3571 of 
                title 18, United States Code,'';
                    (B) by striking ``six months'' and inserting ``10 
                years'';
                    (C) by striking ``fine of not more than $20,000'' 
                and inserting ``fine in accordance with section 3571 of 
                title 18, United States Code,'';
                    (D) by striking ``one year'' and inserting ``20 
                years''; and
                    (E) by inserting ``under this subsection or 
                subsection (i)'' after ``first conviction of such 
                person'';
            (2) in subsection (f), by striking ``fine of not more than 
        $1,000 or by imprisonment for not more than six months,'' and 
        inserting ``fine in accordance with section 3571 of title 18, 
        United States Code, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 
        years,''; and
            (3) in subsection (g), by striking ``fine of not more than 
        $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than six months,'' and 
        inserting ``fine in accordance with section 3571 of title 18, 
        United States Code, or by imprisonment for not more than 1 
        year,''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 797 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 797

To apply the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 to the International 
                           Olympic Committee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 1999

 Mr. Ashcroft introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To apply the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 to the International 
                           Olympic Committee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``International Olympic Committee 
Integrity Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds the following:
            (1) The International Olympic Committee has been beset by 
        allegations of illegal and improper gifts made to its members 
        during the bid process in which cities compete to host the 
        Olympic games.
            (2) In order to maintain the integrity of the Olympic 
        games, reforms are necessary to ensure that future Olympic 
        games are awarded to host cities in an impartial manner.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to prevent persons from 
unfairly influencing the International Olympic Committee with respect 
to the process in which cities compete to host the Olympic games.

SEC. 3. APPLICATION OF FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT OF 1977 TO 
              INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE.

    (a) In General.--Section 104(h)(2) of the Foreign Corrupt Practices 
Act of 1977 (15 U.S.C. 78dd-2(h)(2)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
            ``(C) The term `foreign official' includes any member of, 
        employee of, or any person acting in an official capacity for 
        or on behalf of, the International Olympic Committee.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to any act occurring on or after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### RICHARD C. WINDLEY v. THOMAS D. BRADWAY and SARAH A. PETITT.

*Attachment*— Affidavit— *Sufficiency of.*

An affidavit upon which a warrant of attachment is based must be in writing, and must show that the defendant is “ a non-resident and has property in this State.”

*(Spiers*v. *Halstead, Haines Sf Go.,*71 N. 0. 209, cited and approved.)

MOTION to vacate an Order of Attachment, heard at Chambers on the 21st of December, 1876, before Moore, *J.*

The only point decided in this Court is, as to the sufficiency of the affidavit upon which the proceeding was based.

The motion was disallowed by the Court below, and the defendants appealed.

*Messrs. Geo. H.*Brown, Jr., and *John A.*Moore, for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Busbee Bushee,*for defendants.

Reade, J.

*Spiers*v. *Halstead, Haines & Co.,*71 N. C. 209, is decisive of this case. To support an attachment against the property of the defendant it should appear by affidavit, not only that the defendant is not a resident of this State, but that he has property within the State, C, C. P. § 83.

In this case the affidavit states only the non-i’esidence of the defendants, and does not state that they have property within the State.

It is true that the order of publication and the warrant of attachment both recite that the affidavit does aver that the defendants have property in the State; but then there is the affidavit to speak for itself, and it is for the Court to see that it avers no such thing.

*334Again, the plaintiff says that there might have been an *unwritten*affidavit which warranted the aforesaid recitals. If that were so, still, an unwritten affidavit would not support the attachment; or rather it is more proper to say,that there is no such thing as an *unwritten*affidavit. An affidavit is a ‘‘ sworn statement in writing.5' Bouvier and Webster’s Dictionaries. Therefore the affidavit in the record is our guide, and that is insufficient.

There is error. The motion to vacate the attachment ought to have been allowed, and it is allowed.

Pee CubiaM. Judgment reversed.
STATE OF LOUISIANA 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

LAW INDUSTRIES, LLC 

VERSUS 

STATE OF LOUISIANA, 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, 

RECOVERY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND 

ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL 

CONSULTING, INC. 

NO. 2024 CW 0051 

APRIL 18, 2024 

In Re: Advanced Environmental Consul ting, Inc., applying for 

supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, 

Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 676874. 

BEFORE: HESTER, MILLER, AND GREENE, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED. The portion of the district court's December 

13, 2023 judgment which granted the motion for summary judgment 

as to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality is 

reversed. Third party plaintiff, Advanced Environmental 

Consulting, Inc., has produced factual support sufficient to 

establish the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. 

The motion for summary judgment filed by the Louisiana 

Department of Environmental Quality is denied. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT 

FOR THE COURT 

CHH 

SMM 

HG
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF APPAREL VENTURES, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         166,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,331,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   600,000
<INVENTORY>                                 25,844,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,442,000
<PP&E>                                      11,234,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,175,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,022,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,526,000
<BONDS>                                     36,810,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,485,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,022,000
<SALES>                                     18,718,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,718,000
<CGS>                                       11,449,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,449,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,226,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,253,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,210,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,949,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,261,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,261,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                          14,066
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,066
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           752
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,066
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,974)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (3,400)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,374)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
EX-10.5
                        CLASS A NOTE


For value received, Noved Holdings, Inc. (the "Debtor")
promises to pay to Everlert, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Holder") or order, the principal sum of TWO HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($225,000.00).  The outstanding principal
hereunder shall be due and payable as follows:

(A) On or before the date three (3) months from the date of
this Note, the entire principal sum of  TWO HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($225,000.00), shall be due and payable.

This Note is issued pursuant to an exercise of one hundred
fifty thousand (150,000) Class A Warrants for Common Stock of the
Holder, held by the Debtor.  Reference is made to the Uniform
Commercial Code, as adopted by the State of Nevada, for a full
statement of the rights and obligations of the parties,
including, without limitation, the parties' rights and duties
with respect to the Debtor's failure to pay amounts under the
Note when due.

Payment of this Note shall be made in lawful tender of the
United States.  The Debtor may at any time prepay without penalty
all or any portion of the principal or interest owing hereunder.

The Holder of this Note shall have full recourse against the
make, and shall not be required to proceed against the collateral
securing this Note in the event of default.

If action is instituted to collect this Note, the Debtor
will pay all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's
fees, incurred in connection with such action.  The Debtor hereby
waives notice of default, presentment or demand for payment,
protest or notice of nonpayment or dishonor and all other notices
or demands relative to this instrument.  No delay on the part of
the Holder in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a
waiver of such right or any other right.

The holding of any provision of this Note to be invalid or
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction shall not
affect any other provisions and the other provisions of this Note
shall remain in full force and effect.

The Debtor's obligations under this Note may not be
transferred or assigned to another party without the prior
written consent of the Holder hereof.  All rights and obligations
of the Debtor and the Holder shall be binding upon and benefit
the successors, assigns, heirs and administrators of such
parties.

This Note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Florida, without regard to the conflicts of law
provisions of any state of the United States.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Debtor has caused this Note to be
issued as of April 5, 1999.

NOVED HOLDINGS, INC.


By: /s/  Dan Starczewski
Dan Starczewski, President
#### JAMES WILSON *v.*J. H. BARNHILL.

An affidavit that the defendant is “about to leave the State,”is insuffi-cent as a basis for a warrant of arrest; it ought to have added, “with an intent to defraud his creditors as the affiant believesand then set forth *the grounds*of such belief, so as to show some probable cause.

*Refusal*to allow a second affidavit to be filed, is an exercise of discretion, which cannot be reviewed upon appeal; the plaintiff might have filed a second sufficient affidavit immediately, and obtained a second war- • rant of arrest.

*(Clark*v. *Clark, at this term,*cited and approved.)

Motion to vacate an order of arrest, made before Logan, *J.,*at January Special Term 1870, of Mecklenburg- Court.

The affidavit upon which the order had been granted, after stating the cause of action, set forth that the defendant “ is about to leave the State.” The order was thereupon made, and the defendant arrested December — 1869.

*122At the above Term, a motion was made by the defendant tq vacate the order; and also one by the plaintiff to amend the affidavit, by filing another in which it was stated, upon information and belief, that the defendant *u*has disposed of his lands and portions of his personal property, and is nsing efforts to dispose of the residue, with the purpose of removing to the State of Texas, with the intent thereby to defraud his creditors,” &c.

The Court refused the order to amend, and ordered that the order of arrest should be vacated. The plaintiff appealed.

*Wilson,*for the appellant.

*Dowd, contra.*

Pearson, C. J.

The affidavit upon which the warrant of arrest issued, was not sufficient-to authorize it.

It sets out merely that the defendant Barnhill “ was about to leave the State.” This may be said of every man who is about to take a trip South; or every merchant who is going to the North to buy goods. The affidavit must set out that the party is about to leave the State, with an intent to defraud his creditors, as the affiant believes, — and the grounds of his belief, so as to show some probable cause.

If the defendant had filed a counter affidavit, that would have opened the way for affidavit in reply on the part of the plaintiff; *Clark*v. *Clark,*at this Term. But as no affidavit was filed by the defendant, the motion rested on the insufficiency of the affidavit on which the warrant of arrest issued.

The leave asked, to amend by fifing an additional affidavit, was matter of discretion, and its refusal cannot be received in this Court.

After the defendant was discharged for the insufficiency ot the affidavit, on which the warrant of arrest issued, we can see no reason why the plaintiff, if so advised, could not have *123applied instantly for a second warrant of arrest based on the second affidavit, which sets ont sufficient ground.

There is no, error.

Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SCANTEK
   MEDICAL INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
   ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                1

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                     MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                84,171
<SECURITIES>                                                         473,041
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        400,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                        1,017,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   2,140,169
<PP&E>                                                             2,058,559
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       182,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     4,335,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              3,670,349
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                              18,070
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (1,090,670)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       4,335,755
<SALES>                                                              127,775
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   1,255,275
<CGS>                                                                101,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      1,293,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   167,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (205,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (205,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (205,492)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           (.01)
        



</TABLE>