alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 12.0

                       TRI-STATE OUTDOOR MEDIA GROUP, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Year Ended December 31
                                                 1996        1997         1998
                                                 ----        ----         ----
<S>                                            <C>         <C>         <C>
Loss before income taxes                       $   (895)   $ (3,445)   $ (9,842)
Add
   Portion of rent expenses representative
     of the interest factor                         385         571       1,049
   Interest on indebtedness                      $1,941      $4,200     $10,417
                                               --------    --------    --------
           Income (loss) as adjusted           $  1,431    $  1,326    $  1,624
                                               ========    ========    ========
Fixed charges
   Interest on indebtedness (1)                   1,941       4,200      10,417
                                               --------    --------    --------
Rent expenses:                                    1,156       1,713       3,146
                                               --------    --------    --------
Portion or rent expenses representative
   of interest factor (2)                           385         571       1,049
                                               --------    --------    --------
     Fixed charges (1)+(2)                     $  2,326    $  4,771    $ 11,466
                                               ========    ========    ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   --          --          --
                                               ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 618 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 618

  To provide for the declassification of the journal kept by Glenn T. 
   Seaborg while serving as Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 1999

 Mr. Moynihan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the declassification of the journal kept by Glenn T. 
   Seaborg while serving as Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    (1) Dr. Glenn T. Seaborg was a truly great American who made 
indispensable contributions in the development of nuclear energy.
    (2) Dr. Seaborg was the co-discoverer of plutonium and eight other 
elements and as a result of these discoveries was awarded the 1951 
Nobel Prize for chemistry.
    (3) While serving as Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission 
(AEC), Dr. Seaborg maintained a journal consisting of a diary, 
correspondence, announcements, minutes of meetings, and other documents 
of historical value.
    (4) In preparing the journal, Dr. Seaborg took care to include only 
information which was not classified and could be made public.
    (5) Before leaving the Atomic Energy Commission, Dr. Seaborg 
submitted the journal to the AEC's Division of Classification for 
review.
    (6) Dr. Seaborg's journal was cleared by the Division of 
Classification, virtually without deletion.
    (7) Twelve years later, in 1983, the chief historian at the 
Department of Energy asked to borrow a copy of Dr. Seaborg's journal in 
order to write a history of the AEC.
    (8) When the journal was returned to Dr. Seaborg three years later, 
passage after passage was redacted, including explicitly public 
information, such as the published code names of nuclear weapons tests, 
and purely personal material, such as his description of accompanying 
his children on a ``trick or treat'' outing one Halloween evening.

SEC. 2. DECLASSIFICATION OF SEABORG JOURNAL.

    The Secretary of Energy shall surrender Dr. Glenn T. Seaborg's 
journal, which he prepared while serving as Chairman of the AEC, to Dr. 
Seaborg's estate. The journal shall be returned in the original, 
unredacted form in which it was lent to the Department of Energy in 
1983.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23**

 

Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

 

LimeEnergy Co.Elk Grove Village, Illinois

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-121959, 333-144072, 333-144475, 333-151470, 333-156998and 333-157316) of Lime Energy Co. of our report dated March 22, 2010,relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule which appears inthis Form 10-K.

 

/s/BDO SEIDMAN, LLPMarch 22, 2010

 

----
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 412

To reform criminal procedure, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. DEWINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To reform criminal procedure, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT.

4 (a) REPORT TO ATTORNEY GENERAL.—Not later

5 than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the

6 Attorney General shall require each United States Attor7 ney to—

8 (1) establish an armed violent criminal appre9 hension task force comprised of appropriate law en10 forcement representatives, which shall be responsible

11 for developing strategies for removing armed violent

12 criminals from the streets; and
2

•S 412 IS

1 (2) not less frequently than monthly, report to

2 the Attorney General on the number of defendants

3 charged with, or convicted of, violating section

4 922(g) or 924 of title 18, United States Code, in the

5 district for which the United States Attorney is ap6 pointed.

7 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The Attorney General

8 shall prepare and submit a report to the Congress once

9 every 6 months detailing the contents of the reports sub10 mitted pursuant to subsection (a)(2).

11 SEC. 2. PRETRIAL DETENTION FOR POSSESSION OF FIRE12 ARMS OR EXPLOSIVES BY CONVICTED FEL13 ONS.

14 Section 3156(a)(4) of title 18, United States Code,

15 is amended—

16 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph

17 (B);

18 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara19 graph (C) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

20 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub21 paragraph:

22 ‘‘(D) an offense that is a violation of sec23 tion 842(i) or 922(g) (relating to possession of

24 explosives or firearms by convicted felons);

25 and’’.
3

•S 412 IS

1 SEC. 3. CONFORMING SCIENTER CHANGE FOR TRANSFER2 RING A FIREARM TO COMMIT A CRIME OF VI3 OLENCE.

4 Section 924(h) of title 18, United States Code, is

5 amended by inserting ‘‘or having reasonable cause to be6 lieve’’ after ‘‘knowing’’.

7 SEC. 4. FIREARMS POSSESSION BY VIOLENT FELONS AND

8 SERIOUS DRUG OFFENDERS.

9 Section 924(a)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is

10 amended—

11 (1) by striking ‘‘(2) Whoever’’ and inserting

12 ‘‘(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B),

13 any person who’’; and

14 (2) by adding at the end the following:

15 ‘‘(B) Notwithstanding any other provision of

16 law, the court shall not grant a probationary sen17 tence to a person who has more than 1 previous con18 viction for a violent felony or a serious drug offense,

19 committed under different circumstances.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25399]



[[Page 86790]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE437]


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Enforcement Committee to consider 
actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone 
(EEZ). This meeting will be held in-person with a webinar option. 
Recommendations from this group will be brought to the full Council for 
formal consideration and action, if appropriate.

DATES: This meeting will be held on Monday, November 18, 2024, at 10 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at the Four Points by Sheraton, 
One Audubon Road, Wakefield, MA 01880; telephone: (781) 245-9300.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cate O'Keefe, Executive Director, New 
England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

    The Enforcement Committee will meet to discuss and provide input to 
the On-Demand Fishing Gear Conflict Working Group as it continues 
developing recommendations alternative for gear marking in Federally 
managed fisheries and avoiding gear conflict with existing fisheries. 
Other business will be discussed, if necessary.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained on the agenda may come 
before this Council for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Council action will be restricted 
to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues 
arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action 
under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public 
has been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to 
address the emergency. The public also should be aware that the meeting 
will be recorded. Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 1852, a copy of the 
recording is available upon request.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Cate O'Keefe, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: October 28, 2024.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-25399 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Electric City Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for
the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey R. Mistarz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  3.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and4.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: June 13, 2005 /s/ Jeffrey R. MistarzJeffrey R. MistarzChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Electric City Corp. and will be retained by Electric City Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act
        of 2002, the undersigned officer of Tix Corporation (the “Company”) hereby
        certifies:
 
 (i)
              The
                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
                  March
                  31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
                  Act of
                  1934; and
 
 (ii)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the Company
                  as of and for the periods covered in the Report.
 DATE:
                  May
                      20, 2008
                  /s/
                      MITCH FRANCISMitch
                      Francis,Chief
                      Executive Officer
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
        or
        otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
        electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
        been
        provided to Tix Corporation and will be retained by Tix Corporation and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The
        foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission as an Exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed
        as
        part of the Form 10-Q.
#### DAVID HARMON et al. v. J. F. HERNDON, Adm’r of J. F. Fall, et al.

Appeal— *Undertaking*— Presumption.

1. Nothing to the contrary appearing, it will be presumed that an undertaking on appeal was hied at the date of the justification. It is, however, competent to show that it was filed at another time.-

2. The failure to .give an undertaking on appeal within the prescribed time, is not such an irregularity as contemplated by the statute, Laws 1887, Oh. 121

At the Fall Term, 1886, of the Superior Court of the-County of CLEVELAND, held in the month of October, of that year, *Graves, J.,*presiding, the plaintiffs, appellees, obtained judgment in that Court against the defendants, from which the latter appealed to this Court.

The Court made on the minutes of its proceedings in the-case, this entry: “Defendants allowed thirty days to tender-case and file appeal bond.” The undertaking on appeal is^ filed without date, except that it was justified — just under it on the same paper — on the 7th day of February, 1887.

When the appeal was called for argument, the appellees-moved to dismiss it, upon the ground that the undertaking on appeal was not filed within the time, allowed by law, nor within the time allowed by the Court.

*Mr. Platt D. Walker,*for the plaintiffs.

*Mr. W. P. Bynum,*for the defendants.

Merrimok, J.

We are constrained to allow the motion-It must be taken, nothing to the contrary appearing, that the undertaking on appeal was filed on the day it was justified, and this was quite three months next after the lapse of the time within which the Court directed that it might be filed. It was held in *Boyden*v. *Williams,*92 N. C., 546, that if the *478^undertaking on appeal is without date, and the justification thereof has a date, the latter date must be taken as the date of «the filing thereof. The appellants -might, however, have .-Shown that the undertaking was, in fact, filed within the time allowed by the Court. They did not offer to do so, and ■■the inference is they could not.

This case does not come within the statute (Acts 1887, ch. 121, § 1). The failure to give the undertaking on appeal is not an *“*irregularity ” within the meaning of that statute. *Bowen*v. Fox, 98 N. C., 396.

The appellees are entitled to have their motion allowed.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83918-83919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Removal of International Return 
Receipt

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of the filing of a request 
with the Postal Regulatory Commission to remove International Return 
Receipt from the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification 
Schedule and to make accompanying classification changes.

DATES: Applicable date: January 1, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, 202-268-7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. Sec.  3642 and 39 CFR 
Sec.  3040.130 et seq., as well as 39 U.S.C. Sec.  3632 and 39 CFR 
Sec.  3040.180 et seq., on October 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to 
Remove International Return Receipt from the Competitive Product List 
and to Make Accompanying Classification Changes in the Mail 
Classification Schedule.

[[Page 83919]]

Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket No. MC2025-58.

Christopher Doyle,
Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-24036 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 31.2

****RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS****

I, Lawrence Safarek, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of First Niles Financial, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material aspects the consolidated financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresas of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005

----
#### W. J. Rubel, Appellant, v. Ed Fischer et al., Appellees.

CONTRACTS: Validity of Assent — Signing Without Reading. A per-, son is conclusively presumed to know the contents of an instrument . which he signs, when he can read and does not read, or when he e.an read with difficulty and calls for no explanation; and he is not, in either case, the victim, of any fraud.

*Appeal frmn Plymouth District Court.*— William Hutohinson, Judge.

February 12, 1924.

REHEARING DENIED MAY 16, 1924.

Suit in equity, to foreclose a mortgage clause in two leases of real .estate. The two leases covered the same leased farm for two successive years respectively, and are identical in form, the same mortgage clause appearing in both of them.’ The defendants, being husband and wife, signed the leases, -and occupied the premises for the leased term.- Defendant Ed Fischer, pleaded a general denial, with the admission that he signed the leases and the notes. He pleaded also the pendency of. bankruptcy 'proceedings upon his petition, and a died to stay proceedings.- He also denied specifically that plaintiff had any lien upon the property described in the petition, because it was exempt to him under the statute. The same defense was pleaded by the defendant Mary Fischer. She pleaded further that she signed the lease .without reading the same, and that she did not know its legal effect when she signed the same, and that its effect was in no manner explained to her. Decree was entered dismissing the petition, and plaintiff *appeals.*—

Reversed.

*E. T. Bedell,*for appellant.

’ *J. A. Berry,*for appellees.

Evans, J.

The record discloses no defense either in the pleadings or in the evidence. It does not appear either from the *1321pleadings or from any evidence that any fraudulent representation was made or that any fraud was practiced upon either defendant. It does appear that, at the time the parties signed the leases, they were not read to them, nor did anyone purport to explain them. A written instrument may not be defeated upon such ground. It is claimed that Mrs. Fischer had never had much schooling, and that she could read the leases only with difficulty. This fact was never, disclosed by her to the plaintiff,- nor was it known to the plaintiff. No artifice was used nor obstacle put in the way of any advice or assistance which she might choose to ask. The brief for defendants discloses their great poverty. The foreclosure, therefore, is a great hardship. In such cases, the courts are disposed to solve doubts quite liberally-in favor of mercy, but they have no justification to ignore the legal rights of any litigant. The record herein presents no question of doubt as to the legal merits of the case. Judges, as individuals, are usually sympathetic, but they may not charge the cost of their sympathy to the pocket of the litigant who is legally entitled to judgment. Otherwise, “hard cases” make “bad law.”

This record discloses no defense. The decree below is, accordingly, *reversed.*— Reversed.

ARTHUR, C. J., Preston and Faville, JJ., concur.