alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              73
<SECURITIES>                                     5,401
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,710
<ALLOWANCES>                                       342
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,237
<PP&E>                                          73,283
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,057
<BONDS>                                        112,839
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,496
<SALES>                                         20,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,958
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (369)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,842)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,274)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,568)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,089)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,657)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (48.3)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (48.3)
        

</TABLE>
#### GEORGE M. ISENHOUR, Adm’r., &c. *v.*DANIEL and HENRY M. ISENHOUR.

The exception to the rule allowing parties to testify, i. e. as to *transactions*between such party and a person deceased : does not extend to cases where a defendant is offered as a witness to testify that a bond which was given to a person deceased, and which is the subject matter of the suit, was *in blank*as to the *amount*payable when executed by him; having been filled up afterwards in his absence, and without due authority.

Civil action upon a bond payable to the intestate, tried before Logan, *J.,*at Spring Term 1870, of Cabaeeus Court.

The defendant Henry having answered that the instrument sued upon was not his act and deed, offered upon the trial his co-defendant Daniel as a witness, to prove that when he, Henry, executed it, it was in blank as to the *641amount payable, and that it was filled up afterwards, in bis absence, and without authority under seal.

His Honor excluded the testimony, and the defendant excepted.

Yerdict for the plaintiff. Judgment accordingly. Appeal fry the defendants.

*Boyden*& *Bailey,*for the appellants.

*Dowd, contra.*

Bodman, J.

The only question in the case is, was the defendant Daniel Isenhour, a competent witness on behalf of himself and his co-defendant, to prove that the bond declared on was blank in respect to the amount payable, when it was signed and sealed by the defendants, and that the words and figures showing the amount were inserted by the witness after the signature and sealing by his co-defendant, and without authority from him. We think the evidence was competent. Section 342, C. C. P., removes the disqualification of interest; and section 343 allows a party4 to be examined in his own behalf. The *proviso*limits the generality of the allowance, by forbidding a party, &c., from testifying as to a transaction or communication between him and a person deceased, &c. Here, the matter which the witness has offered to prove, was not *a*transaction, *or communication*with the deceased intestate of the plaintiff; it was as to a matter which took place in his absence. The exclusion of the evidence is not required by the words of the act.

We think also, that it is not by its spirit or purpose. It is said that the intestate of the plaintiff, if alive, might testify that when the bond declared on was delivered to him, it was acknowledged by Henry, as well as by Daniel Isenhour, as his deed. It is possible he might have done so. But if the act *642were construed to have the extensive effect contended for,, it would exclude the testimony of an opposite party in every case where the representative of a deceased person was a. party, as to any. fact whatever; because, possibly, the deceased, if alive, might contradict the witness, or prove some fact inconsistent with his evidence. Such was not its intention. That may be a desirable rule, but it is not the one adopted by the Legislature.

There was error by the Judge below, and there must be a *venvre de novo. ^*

Pee. Curiam. *Temre de novo.*
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 670 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 670

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
 exclusion from gross income for foster care payments shall also apply 
 to payments by qualifying placement agencies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 1999

Mr. Jeffords (for himself and Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
 exclusion from gross income for foster care payments shall also apply 
 to payments by qualifying placement agencies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR FOSTER CARE PAYMENTS TO APPLY TO PAYMENTS BY 
              QUALIFYING PLACEMENT AGENCIES.

    (a) In General.--The matter preceding subparagraph (B) of section 
131(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified 
foster care payment) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) In general.--The term `qualified foster care payment' 
        means any payment made pursuant to a foster care program of a 
        State or political subdivision thereof--
                    ``(A) which is paid by--
                            ``(i) a State or political subdivision 
                        thereof, or
                            ``(ii) a qualified foster care placement 
                        agency, and''.
    (b) Qualified Foster Individuals To Include Individuals Placed by 
Qualifying Placement Agencies.--Subparagraph (B) of section 131(b)(2) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified foster 
individual) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(B) a qualified foster care placement agency.''
    (c) Qualified Foster Care Placement Agency Defined.--Section 131(b) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating 
paragraph (3) as paragraph (4) and by inserting after paragraph (2) the 
following:
            ``(3) Qualified foster care placement agency.--The term 
        `qualified foster care placement agency' means any placement 
        agency which is licensed or certified by a State or political 
        subdivision thereof to make foster care payments to providers 
        of foster care.''
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
----

                                                                                                                                                                **Exhibit 23.2**

CONSENT FROM INDEPENDENT REIGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated March 15, 2007 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Envirokare Tech, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as the same may be amended from time to time, into the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 8, 2000 (File No. 333-31966) and the Company's Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on September 27, 2000 (File No. 333-31966).

/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.    Williams & Webster, P.S.*Certified Public Accountants*    Spokane, Washington    March 28, 2008
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersignedofficer of Boston Restaurant Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge andbelief, that:

 

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 25, 2004 (the “Form10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialsrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  March 8, 2004 | /s/ Fran  Ross           |   |
|----------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                       | Fran Ross                |
|                       | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

Thiscertification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection.  Such certification will not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Securities Exchange Act.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GS INDUSTRIES FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,850
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,316<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    121,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,759
<PP&E>                                         245,626<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 592,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,286
<BONDS>                                        338,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   592,175
<SALES>                                        586,105
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               586,105
<CGS>                                          516,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (31,603)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,454
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (35,057)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (35,057)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNTS PRESENTED ARE NET.
</FN>


</TABLE>
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

CAUSE NO. DA 20-0333

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

JEFFERY PATRICK HEENAN,

 Petitioner & Appellant, 

and

SARAH KATE WALLACE,

 Respondent & Appellee.

ORDER GRANTING 

EXTENSION OF TIME

BASED UPON the Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, 

and good cause appearing, therefore: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Appellant is given an extension of time 

until September 30, 2020, to prepare, file and serve the Appellant’s Opening Brief. 

Dated this ___ day of ________________ 2020. 

___________________________

Montana Supreme Court Judge

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 31 2020

07/31/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0333
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, the undersigned officer of ING Insurance Company of America (the “Company”)hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| November 12, 2004 |   | By     | /s/  Brian D. Comer |
|-------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
| (Date)            |   |   |                          | Brian D. Comer |
|              |   |   | President                     |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**


**Pursuant
      to 18 United States Code Section 1350**








The
      undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 of Nanobac Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated (the
      "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                John D Stanton-------------------------------------------John
                D StantonChief
                Financial OfficerMay
                18, 2007











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nanobac Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated and will be retained by it and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





31
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 10, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10337 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHRISTOPHER SHAUN MCDONALD, also known as Chris McDonald, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-293-ALL-A

-------------------- Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Christopher Shaun McDonald pleaded guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to wire fraud, and he was sentenced to nine months’ imprisonment, three years’ supervised release, a special assessment of $100, and restitution in the amount of $18,846.65. On appeal, McDonald argues that the district court erred when it failed to consider his ability to pay when scheduling his immediate payment of restitution. McDonald also asserts that theNo. 04-10337 -2- court was not authorized to order the immediate payment of restitution as a condition of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583 because his term of supervised release had not yet commenced. However, the district court considered McDonald’s assets, earnings, and financial obligations when it scheduled the payment of restitution, and McDonald has not shown any error in the court’s restitution order. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664(f)(2); United States v. Howard , 220 F.3d 645, 647 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v. Myers , 198 F.3d 160, 169 (5th Cir. 1999). McDonald also argues that the district court erred in ordering that he pay restitution to one victim for expenses related to his nonmandatory attendance as an observer at court proceedings. The Mandatory Victims Restitution Act requires a defendant to “reimburse the victim for lost income and necessary child care, transportation, and other expenses incurred during participation in the investigation or prosecution of the offense or attendance at proceedings related to the offense.” 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(b)(4). Under the plain language of the statute, the district court did not err in awarding restitution for the victim’s court attendance. See United States v. MoralesPalacios , 369 F.3d 442, 446 (5th Cir. 2004); see also United States v. Malpeso , 126 F.3d 92, 94-95 (2d Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Company’s annual report on
Form 10-K to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act.
In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification
(A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and
(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date:
      March 12, 2010/s/ Thomas
      E. D’AmbraName:
                Thomas
      E. D’Ambra, Ph.D.Title:
                President
      and Chief Executive
Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkona, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Alan
Rudd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Alan Rudd
---------------------------
    Alan Rudd
    Chief Executive Officer
    August 14, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 208 (Monday, October 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 85549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research, including consideration of 
personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of 
individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.
    Date: December 3, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Address: National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research, 
31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Yun Mei, M.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental & 
Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-4639, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a7ded2c989cac2cee7c9cecf89c0c8d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6dfd3c888cbc3cfe6c8cfce88c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 22, 2024.
Bruce A. George,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-24951 Filed 10-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 23.02**

 

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration StatementsNos. 333-11523, 333-91146, 333-68590, 333-90029, 333-70455, and 333-31190 on Form S-8 of Concur Technologies, Inc. of our report dated November 5, 2002 with respect to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cashflows and schedule of Concur Technologies, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2002, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2004. 

 

**ERNST & YOUNG LLP**

 

Seattle, Washington 

December 13, 2004