alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. 698

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To review the suitability and feasibility of recovering costs of high altitude rescues

at Denali National Park and Preserve in the State of Alaska, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That no later

than nine months after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary

of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall

complete a report on the suitability and feasibility of recovering

the costs of high altitude rescues on Mt. McKinley, within Denali

National Park and Preserve. The Secretary shall also report on

the suitability and feasibility of requiring climbers to provide proof

of medical insurance prior to the issuance of a climbing permit

by the National Park Service. The report shall also review the

amount of fees charged for a climbing permit and make such recommendations for changing the fee structure as the Secretary deems

appropriate. Upon completion, the report shall be submitted to

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate,

and the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
###                                 EXHIBIT 12

```

                                EXHIBIT 12

                      AIRBORNE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    PERCENTAGE RATIO OF TOTAL LONG-TERM
                       DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION

                                                     DECEMBER 31, 2000
                                                    ------------------
                                                  (Dollars in thousands)

LONG-TERM DEBT:
   Revolving Credit Agreement                               $   75,000
   Money Market Lines of Credit                                 28,000
   Senior Notes                                                200,000
   Refunding Revenue Bonds                                      13,200
   Other                                                         6,507
                                                            ----------
                                                               322,707
   Less Current Portion                                            477
                                                            ----------
     Total Long-term Debt                                   $  322,230
                                                            ==========
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION:
   Long-term Debt                                              322,230
   Deferred Income Taxes                                       125,444
   Shareholders Equity, Net                                    862,855
                                                            ----------
     Total Capitalization                                   $1,310,529
                                                            ==========
RATIO OF TOTAL LONG-TERM DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION            24.6%
                                                            ==========
```
#### *Doe on dem.*of J. W. HOWELL and others v. ALLEN BUIE.

The act of February 10th 1863, (ch. 34,,) by suspending the statute of limitations, prevented a possession of land extending from October 15th 1845 to January 16th 1868, from barring the State under the act giving such operation to *twenty-one*years’ possession with color of title.

Ejectment, tried before *Buxton, J.,*at Spring Term 1870 of Moore Court.

The facts appear in the Opinion.

Verdict, &c., for the defendant; and the plaintiff appealed.

*447*Fuller and Phillips &*Merrimon, for the appellant.

Manning, *contra.*

Beade, J.

The lessor of the plaintiff claims title under a grant from the State, dated August 12th 1867. The defendant claims title by virtue of twenty-one years’ possession under color of title, and known and visible boundaries: Eev. Code, ch. 65, s. 2. Defendant had such possession from October 15th 1845, to January 1868; more than twenty-one years. The plaintiff replies to this, that the act of February 10th 1863, chap. 34, suspends the statute of limitation in the Bevised Code, *supra :*and that is the only question in the case. That act is as follows : “In computations of time for the purpose of applying any statute limiting any action or suit, or any right or rights, or for the purpose of raising any presumption of any release, payment or satisfaction, or any grant or conveyance, the time elapsed since May 20th 1861, or which may elapse until the end of the present war, •shall be excluded from such computation.”

At the time of the passage of that act the defendant had had possession for less than sixteen years. Add the time of his possession after the war, and it still makes less than twenty-one years : and therefore the State, under which the plaintiff claims, was not barred by the statute of limitations. If it had appeared in the case, as probably the fact is, that those under whom the defendant claims had had possession for such length of time as added to the defendant’s possession would have made twenty-one years up to the act of 1863, the defendant’s title would be good. If the fact is so, then it may avail the defendant in a subsequent proceeding, but not as the case is now before us.

There is no error.

Pee Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-073-CV

IN RE JOSEPH A. BONOLA, D.D.S., 				          RELATORS

JOSEPH A. BONOLA, D.D.S., P.C., NCD, P.A. 

AND OPUS INDUSTRIES, INC.	

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MEIER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED:  March 16, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a                               ( print page 86848)                            domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 24, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 533 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-156, K2025-154.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25305 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### Exhibit 32.1

### 

### 

### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Community Properties Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Michael Wilson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|/s/ J. Michael Wilson               
|------------------------------------
|J. Michael Wilson                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|December 9, 2005
#### Chitlik, Respondent, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Appellants.

*April 9*—

April *27, 1937.*

*8For the appellants there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general, attorneys for the Industrial Commission, and by *Coleman ■& Barry*of Milwaukee, attorneys for the Century Indemnity Company, and oral argument by *Mr. Levitan*and *Mr. John S. Barry.*

*9For the respondent there was a brief by *Joseph A. Padway,*attorney, and *L. A. Tarrell*of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Tarrell.*

Fairchild, J.

There was a conflict in the evidence. As stated by the trial judge :

> “There are roughly twenty facts, uncontradicted as far as the record goes, which go to establish the employer-employee relationship as a matter of law. There are a half dozen other facts, equally uncontradicted in the record, which have persuasive force against the existence of the relationship.”

The only question involved relates to the existence of credible evidence to sustain the finding made by the commission that a relationship of employer and employee did not exist between Morris Chitlik and David Chitlik at the time of the injury. The facts referred to as tending to establish the nonexistence of the relationship also tend to prove that Morris Chitlik was in business for himself. These facts include the issuing of licenses in his own name and the application for telephone service. He owned and operated the truck with the license in his name. The commission when reviewing the matter was impressed by certain circumstances tending to discredit the testimony offered by the claimant. With reference to the absence of records of transactions in the store conducted by the claimant, the commission says that the testimony of the parties “is so evasive and unsatisfactory that the commission believes it to be incredible.” The findings and' order of the Industrial Commission also contain recitals showing that the commission by reason of circumstances established by the testimony were convinced that the claimant owned and operated the store, and adds :

> “This assumption is further fortified by the taking of a cigarette and food dealer’s license in the name of the applicant, which the city ordinance requires shall be taken by the owner, and the further fact that request for telephone service was signed by the applicant, and that the telephone was listed in his name.”

*10Under well-established rules, the findings of fact of the commission are conclusive. Sec. 102.18 (4), Stats. *Northwestern Iron Co. v. Industrial Comm.*154 Wis. *97,*142 N. W. 271; *Wausau Lumber Co. v. Industrial Comm.*166 Wis. 204, 164 N. W. 836; *Goldsworthy v. Industrial Comm.*212 Wis. 544, 250 N. W. 427, and cases therein referred to. Although inferences might reasonably be drawn to support the conclusion that an employer-employee relation existed, such facts are established from which reasonable inferences might be drawn to support the conclusion that Morris was an independent operator.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to confirm the order of the Industrial Commission.
Exhibit 99(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to
the Annual Report of Airborne, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl D. Donaway, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as enacted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written
statement required by said § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/S/ CARL D. DONAWAY

Carl D. Donaway

Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board

April 29, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 506 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-123, K2025-121.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-25259 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

ALLYSON FILIPPS

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 15 DB 2021 ( No. 16 RST 2021)

Attorney Registration No. 209751

( Northampton County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of March

, 202 1 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated March 15, 2021

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Allyson Filipps

, who has been on Administrative Suspension

, has never been suspended

or disbarred, and has demonstrated that s h e has the moral qualifications, competency

and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and

is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of th e Bar of this Commonwealth. The

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall

be paid by the Petitioner.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Boston Restaurant Associates,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the bestof such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:

(1)    TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  October 29, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialsrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: December 5, 2006 | /s/ Fran Ross           |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    | Fran Ross               |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject tothe liability of that section.  Suchcertification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.

----
#### A. C. SANDERS v. J. A. NORRIS.

*New Trial*— Lost *Papers.*

Where'the papers in the ease, and the notes of the trial of an action have been lost or mislaid, the only mode by which justice can be had is to *244grant a new trial, if it appear that the party seeking it has been guilty of no laches. (See same case, ante, 4.)

*(Isler*v. Haddock, 72 N. C., 119; *Mason*v. Osgood, Id., 120 ; *Simonton*y. *Simonton,*80 N. 0., 7; *State*v. *Powers,*3 Hawks, 376, cited and approved.)

Petition for *Certiorari*granted at January Term, 1880, of The Supreme Court.

This case was brought to this court at the present term by a writ of *certiorari*as a substitute for an appeal, and the facts as gathered from the record, the petition for the writ, and the certificate of the clerk, are fully set out in the opinion of the court.

*Messrs. D. G. Fowle*and *A. M. Lewis,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. W. H. Pace*and *T. M. Argo,*for defendant.

Ashe, J.

At the January term, 1879, of the superior court for the county of Wake, a judgment was rendered in behalf of the plaintiff against the defendant, from which judgment the defendant appealed to this court, and filed his bond. A statement of the case was made up by the counsel of the defendant and duly served on the counsel of the plaintiff, who made a counter-statement, and each was submitted to the judge presiding to make up the case, who fixed the 15th day of February, 1879, to settle the same. The papers in the case were sent by the clerk of the court, in the meantime, to the judge, but no case has ever been settled by him in consequence of the papers and notes of the trial having been lost or mislaid.

The defendant is entitled to his appeal, and has lost it by no laches on his part; and in such cases it has been the established practice of this court to order a new trial. In the cases of *Isler*v. *Haddock,*72 N. C., 119; *Mason*v. *Osgood, Id.,*120, and *Simonton*v. *Simonton,*80 N. C., 7, where the *245judge presiding went out of office before a statement of the case was made out, and without the default of the party applying, new trials were ordered as the only remedy in such cases. And so in the case of the *State*v. Powers, 3 Hawks, 376, where it appeared from the certificate of the presiding judge that a case presenting the points was intended to be made up, but was prevented from his having lost the notes of the trial, the court held that there was no other mode by which the justice of the case could be attained but by awarding a new trial. Upon these and other authorities that might be cited, a new trial must be awarded in this case. Let this be certified to the superior court of Wake county.

Per Curiam. *Venire de novo.*
Exhibit 99.11  CONSENT OF SYLVIE LAMPRON  I consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March     , 2017 (the Annual Report) of my name and the information that I have approved of as a qualified person under the Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 in the Annual Information Form of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited dated March     , 2017 (the AIF) filed as part of the Annual Report.  I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-10 (registration no. 333-206498), Form F-3D (registration no. 333-215096) and Form S-8 (registration nos. 333-130339 and 333-152004) of the reference to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.  March 27, 2017  /s/Sylvie LampronSylvie LampronPrincipal Engineer at   Canadian Malartic Corporation
EXHIBIT 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

To the Board of Directors
EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statements of EVCI Career Colleges
Incorporated on Forms S-3 (#333-34190, 333-48934, 333-84358 and 333-99127) and
Forms S-8 (#333-34158, #333-72080 and #333-102310) of our report dated February
3, 2003, on the financial statements of EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for the years then ended appearing in the annual
report on Form 10-KSB of EVCI Career Colleges Incorporated for the year ended
December 31, 2002. We also consent to the reference of our firm under the
caption "Experts" contained in such Registration Statements.

/s/GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

March 28, 2003