alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanguine Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Thomas C. Drees, President and David E. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: 6/2/04                             /s/Thomas C. Drees
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         Thomas C. Drees
                                         President and director


Date: 6/1/04                             /s/David E. Nelson
     ----------                          ---------------------
                                         David E. Nelson
                                         Chief Financial Officer and director
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

                In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form l0-Qfor the period ended October 3, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. T. Malugen, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 12, 2004      |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
| /s/ J. T. Malugen            |   |
| Name: J. T. Malugen          |   |
| Its: Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Movie Gallery, Inc. and will be retained byMovie Gallery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
#### In the Matter of an Application to Conduct Audio-Visual Coverage of The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Richard J. Wright, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Rensselaer County,

March 3, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Zubres, D’Agostino & Hoblock*for Knight Ridder Broadcasting, Inc., applicant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward S. Conway, J.

This is a review of an order determining an application for permission to provide coverage, rendered pursuant to subdivision (d) of section 131.4 of the "Administrative Order of the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts” (22 NYCRR part 131), concerning "Audio-Visual Coverage of Judicial Proceeding”, upon the request of the petitioners.

Pursuant to section 131.5 (b), review as Administrative Judge, I must uphold such order unless it is found that the *907order reflects an abuse of discretion by the presiding Trial Judge. Pursuant to section 131.5 (d), in this court’s opinion, the Administrative Judge is authorized to review only the presiding Trial Judge’s order pursuant to paragraph (c) of subdivision (3) of section 218 of the Judiciary Law, determining an application for permission to provide coverage of judicial proceedings, and that an Administrative Judge has no review authorization of the contents of the order. The rule states: "shall not authorize review of any other orders or decisions of the presiding trial judge relating to such coverage.” The statute (Judiciary Law § 218 [3] [c]) provides in part: "[s]uch order or determination for *initial access*shall be subject to review by the appropriate administrative judge.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Therefore, this application to review Judge Dwyer’s determination which barred audio-visual coverage of the testimony of Mrs. Gerilyn Pipino must be denied for lack of authority to review such determination.

The application is therefore denied.
Pope and Laden estimates for SO2 12/14/2011 01:44 PM

From: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US Sort List...

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney,

Bob Wayland asked me to respond to your question below.

The inital estimates were based off of the dollar per ton estimate of $73,000 per ton of SO2 reduced in the east, from the "Laden" (Harvard based) study. The dollar per ton for the "Pope" (American Cancer Society) study is $29,000 per ton.

Thus, the range of benefits estimates for the 670 tons of SO2 for the area sources is $19 million to $49 million, for 2016, reported in 2007

dollars.

Regards, Bryan

Dr. Bryan J. Hubbell Leader, Risk and Benefits Group Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. EPA/OAQPS (C504-02) RTP, NC 27711 (919) 541-0621

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/14/2011 12:17 PM Subject: RE: 30 vs 90 and area sources

Hi Bob, Is that the Pope or Laden value of $73,000 per ton of SO2 reduced in the east? Can you provide us with the other value?

Regards, Cortney
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 21, 2012 

h0514 

Order 

 

May 21, 2012 

144558 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144558 

 COA: 306948 

Livingston CC: 07-016357-FH 

KIRK ALAN JOHNSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 14, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00968

- CV

In the Estate of Patricia M. Ripley, Deceased

,

Appellant

- s

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 201 8

- PC

- 1990

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Motion for rehearing is hereby

GRANTED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHERE OF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA

, Chief Deputy Clerk
#### Shepherd *v*. Sawyer.

Special verdict from Camden.

A; agrees with B, for per *cent,*premium paid *down, to*insure a negro slave reported to be lost in Pasquotank river. B. had no interest in the negro; yet his loss being proved, B. is entitled to recover his value.

Innocent wagers are recoverable. They are illegal, where,

*1. They be*prohibited by statute.

2. They tend to create an improper influence on the mind in the exercise of a public duty.

8. They are “ *contra bonos mores,1’*or

4. They in any other manner tend to the prejudice of the public, or the injury of third persons.

The Jury found for the Plaintiff, and assessed his damages lo £200, subject to the opinion of the Court upon the following case. The Plaintiff,' Shepherd, started a boat loaded with brick, from Richmond, on Pasquotank river, down to Davis’s bay, a distance of about seven or eight miles; the boat was rowed by a white man and several negroes, among whom was the fellow Jacob, hereafter mentioned. A few days after the boat was started, a report was circulated that the boat and all persons on board were lost. The Plaintiff and Defendant were together at Camden court-house, when this report *27reached that place, and the Defendant offered to insure the negro fellow Jacob for the premium of two and a half per cent, which offer was accepted by the Plaintiff, and the premium was paid down. It afterwards appeared that Jacob and all the other hands on board of the boat were lost. The Jury found that the conduct of the Plaintiff was fair, open and candid, but that he had no interest whatever in the property insured.

Haul, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It is submitted to this Court to decide, whether, upon the facts found by the Jury in this case, the Plaintiff be entitled to recover ? It is not contended that this case falls within the purview and meaning of any act of. Asr sembly passed in this State, for the purpose of suppressing unlawful gaming; and there can he no doubt, but that the Common Law (which is the Law of this State) interposes no obstacle to a recovery. *Marshall,*on Insurance, 96, says, “ Innocent wagers have long had the sanction of the Common Law; — (11 *Rep.*876 — 1 *Lev.*33 — 5 *Bur.*2802) — they are only deemed illegal when they are prohibited by statute ; when they tend to create an improper influence on the mind in the exercise of a public duty ; when they are *“ contra bonos mores,”*or in any other manner tend to the prejudice of (he public, or the injury of third persons” — (6 *Term*499 — 1 *Term*56— 2 *Term 610*— Cotvper 729.) And to the cases referred to by *Marshall,*may be added the case of *Good*v. *Elliott,*(3 *Term*693.) These authorities are conclusive. Let judgment be entered for the Plaintiff.
Public Interest

Please also consider the public interest as it pertains to fuel emissions. Additionally the UAS runs on battery power and does not emit fumes or run on gases are potentially harmful to the environment. The operation of this UAS removes human exposure to these situations as it pertains to full size helicopters that may be used fo r photography or videography. If a UAS such as the Inspire 1 does lose control and crashes there is no flammable gas that may explode.

Equivalent Level of Safety An equivalent level of safety will be obtained by the operator per the Operator Manual and User Guide. A data log will supplement safety along with automatic tracking of flight time and distances to gauge when maintenance will be required. The operator will make sure all systems are functioning properly prior to all flights. If any issues a rise the UAS will immediately land where it is able to do so safely. The ability to land in otherwise difficult or impossible areas where a helicopter may be unable to land will create less risk than a traditional rotorcraft which performs the same operat ion.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10646]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1215
                          RESTORING CONFIDENCE

  (Mr. FARR asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. FARR. Mr. Speaker, I rise to share the anger expressed by my 
constituents and constituents of many Members of Congress--anger over 
the financial mess that we are in, anger at Wall Street for the greed 
that got us there, and anger at the White House for the arrogance in 
asking Congress to authorize $700 billion without any conditions.
  However, the public should not be angry that the Congress has tried 
to respond, not to the President's request but to the public's need for 
checks and balances. We wrote an entirely new bill, the contents of 
which are on every Member's Web site. It provides relief with checks 
and balances, oversight for taxpayer safeguards, and addresses obscene 
salaries and abusive golden parachutes. It is not a perfect bill, but 
it is a responsible bill.
  The best thing that came out of the last 10 days is that the 
institutions of government became responsible for governing the affairs 
of this Nation in a bipartisan manner. Now let's hope that this House 
will follow the leadership of the Senate last night in passing a 
responsible recovery plan.
  In the end, it is the institutions of government that have to regain 
confidence. Let's hope that this November election will elect 
leadership that can restore that confidence to the Nation and the 
world.

                          ____________________
```
---

**EXHIBIT 12.1**

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Daniel Clozza, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Forum
National Investments Ltd.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

The company's other certifying officers and I am responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluations; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting:
and

The company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the
design or operation of internal control of financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.



|Date: April 2, 2009 | /s/
      Daniel Clozza                                  
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Daniel Clozza, Chief Executive Officer and
      Director

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10646]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

ELKIN CITY SCHOOLS HONORED FOR NORTH CAROLINA'S HIGHEST GRADUATION RATE

  (Ms. FOXX asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, today I want to highlight some good news from 
the Fifth District of North Carolina.
  Last month, the State of North Carolina recognized Elkin City Schools 
in Elkin, North Carolina for having the best graduation rate in the 
entire State.
  By graduating nine out of ten seniors this past school year, Elkin 
City Schools is blazing a trail of high academic standards in Northwest 
North Carolina.
  Elkin's efforts to make sure its students cross the finish line will 
pay real dividends for the Elkin community in the future. An 
outstanding high school graduation rate not only has a stabilizing 
effect on the social fabric of the community, but it also lays a 
foundation for young adults ready to take their place as community 
leaders and productive members of society.
  Congratulations to Elkin City Schools, its many graduates, their 
parents, faculty, and staff. You have set the standard for excellence.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1854
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1846
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      15464
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            2810
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              3039
<LOANS>                                         148527
<ALLOWANCE>                                        986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  183066
<DEPOSITS>                                      129997
<SHORT-TERM>                                     24031
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                580
<LONG-TERM>                                      13000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                       14734
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  183066
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   8823
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  640
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   473
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  9936
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                4085
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5570
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             4366
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      108
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   3294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1838
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1163
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.09
<LOANS-NON>                                        688
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   299
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1163
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   928
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       50
<RECOVERIES>                                       108
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  986
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            986
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SCANTEK
MEDICAL INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>               1

       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                           653,869
<SECURITIES>                                                   8,388,716
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    850,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               9,963,753
<PP&E>                                                           408,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    19,118
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                11,319,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          6,213,088
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                          17,220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     4,551,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  11,319,877
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  18,167
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    307,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                46,671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (289,007)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (289,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (289,007)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0
        


</TABLE>