The EPA Regional Administrator, Jared Blumenfeld, s igned the following rule on June 29, 2015 and EPA i s

submitting it for publication in the Federal Register (FR). While we have taken steps to ensure the accu racy of this version of this rule, it is not the official versio n. Please refer to the official version in a forthc oming FR publication appearing on the Government Printing Office website , http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action , and on www.regulations.gov in Docket Number EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0297.
Billing Code: 6560-50-P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0297; FRL-______ Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air Qua lity State Implementation Plans; Arizona; Infrastructure Requi rements for Lead and Ozone
AGENCY : Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION : Final rule.
SUMMARY : The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is part ially approving and partially disapproving State Implemen tation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Arizona t o address the requirements of section 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Cl ean Air Act (CAA) for the 2008 Lead (Pb) and 2008 ozone nationa l ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Section 110(a) of the CA A requires that each State adopt and submit a SIP for the impl ementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each NAAQS promulga ted by EPA. We refer to such SIP revisions as "infrastructure" SIPs because they are intended to address basic structural SIP r equirements for new or revised NAAQS including, but not limited to, legalThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

2 authority, regulatory structure, resources, permit programs, monitoring, and modeling necessary to assure attain ment and maintenance of the standards.
DATES: This final rule is effective on [ Insert date 30 days from date of publication ].
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-R09-OAR-2015-029 7. The index to the docket for this action is available electron ically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne, San Francisco, California. While all doc uments in the docket are listed in the index, some information ma y be publically available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material) and some may not be publicall y available in either location (e.g., confidential business inf ormation (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the c ontact listed directly below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jeffrey Buss, Office of Air Planning, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Reg ion 9, (415) 947-4152, e-mail: buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Throughout this document, the terms “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to EPA.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Background II. Proposed Action III. Public Comments and EPA Responses IV. Final Action V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background CAA section 110(a)(1) requires each state to submit to EPA, within three years after the promulgation of a prim ary or secondary NAAQS or any revision thereof, an infrast ructure SIP revision that provides for the implementation, main tenance, and enforcement of such NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) sets t he content requirements of such a plan, which generally relate to the information and authorities, compliance assurances, procedural requirements, and control measures that constitute the "infrastructure" of a state's air quality managemen t program. These infrastructure SIP elements required by secti on 110(a)(2) are as follows:

• Section 110(a)(2)(A): Emission limits and other con trol

measures.

• Section 110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air quality monitorin g/data system.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

4 • Section 110(a)(2)(C): Program for enforcement of co ntrol measures and regulation of new and modified station ary

sources.

• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i): Interstate pollution trans port.

• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii): Interstate and internatio nal pollution abatement.

• Section 110(a)(2)(E): Adequate resources and author ity, conflict of interest, and oversight of local and re gional government agencies.

• Section 110(a)(2)(F): Stationary source monitoring and reporting.

• Section 110(a)(2)(G): Emergency episodes.

• Section 110(a)(2)(H): SIP revisions.

• Section 110(a)(2)(J): Consultation with government officials, public notification, prevention of signi ficant deterioration (PSD), and visibility protection.

• Section 110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling and subm ittal of modeling data.

• Section 110(a)(2)(L): Permitting fees.

• Section 110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/participation by affected local entities.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

5 Two elements identified in section 110(a)(2) are no t governed by the three-year submittal deadline of se ction 110(a)(1) and are therefore not addressed in this a ction. These two elements are: (i) section 110(a)(2)(C) to the e xtent it refers to permit programs required under part D (no nattainment new source review (NSR)), and (ii) section 110(a)(2 )(I), pertaining to the nonattainment planning requiremen ts of part D. As a result, this action does not address infrastru cture for the nonattainment NSR portion of section 110(a)(2)(C) o r the whole of section 110(a)(2)(I). On November 12, 2008, the EPA issued a revised NAAQ S for Pb. 1 This action triggered a requirement for states to submit an infrastructure SIP to address the applicable requir ements of section 110(a)(2) within three years of issuance of the revised NAAQS. On October 14, 2011, EPA issued “Guidance on Section 110 Infrastructure SIPs for the 2008 Pb NAAQS”, referre d to herein as EPA’s 2011 Pb Guidance. 2 Depending on the timing of a given submittal, some states relied on the earlier draft version of

1 73 FR 66964 (November 12, 2008). The 1978 Pb stand ard (1.5 μg/m 3 as a quarterly average) was modified to a rolling 3 mont h average not to be exceeded of 0.15 μg/m 3 . EPA also revised the secondary NAAQS to 0.15 μg/m 3 and made it identical to the revised primary standard. Id. 2 See Memorandum from Stephen D. Page, Director, Off ice of Air Quality Planning and Standards, to Regional Air Division Di rectors, Regions 1-10 (October 14, 2011).This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

6 this guidance, referred to herein as EPA’s 2011 Dra ft Pb Guidance. 3 EPA issued additional guidance on infrastructure SIPs on September 13, 2013. 4 On March 27, 2008, EPA issued a revised NAAQS for 8 -hour
Ozone. 5 This action triggered a requirement for states to submit an infrastructure SIP to address the applicable req uirements of section 110(a)(2) within three years of issuance of the revised NAAQS. EPA did not, however, prepare guidance at th is time for states in submitting I-SIP revisions for the 2008 O zone NAAQS. 6 On September 13, 2013, EPA issued “Guidance of Infr astructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clea n Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2),” which provides a dvice on the development of infrastructure SIPs for the 2008 ozo ne NAAQS (among other pollutants) as well as infrastructure SIPs for new or revised NAAQS promulgated in the future. 7

3 “DRAFT Guidance on SIP Elements Required Under Sec tions 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 2008 Lead (Pb) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),” June 17, 2011 version. 4 See Memorandum dated September 13, 2013 from Stephen D. Page, Director, EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, to Re gional Air Directors, EPA Regions 1-10, “Guidance on Infrastructure State Imp lementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2)” (referred to herein as “2013 Infrastructure SIP Guidance”). 5 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). 6 Preparation of guidance for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS w as postponed given EPA’s reconsideration of the standard. See 78 FR 34183 (J une 6, 2013). 7 See Memorandum dated September 13, 2013 from Steph en D. Page, Director, EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, to Re gional Air Directors, EPA Regions 1-10, “Guidance on Infrastructure State Imp lementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2)” (referred to herein as “2013 Infrastructure SIP Guidance”).This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

7 The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (AD EQ) has submitted infrastructure SIP revisions pursuant to EPA’s promulgation of the NAAQS addressed by this rule, i ncluding the following:

• October 14, 2011 – “Arizona State Implementation Pl an Revision under Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(1) and (2); 2008 Lead NAAQS,” to address all of the CAA section 110(a)(2) requirements, except for section 110(a)(2)(G), 8 for the 2008 Pb NAAQS (2011 Pb I-SIP Submittal).

• December 27, 2012 - “Arizona State Implementation P lan Revision under Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(1) and (2); 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS,” to address all of th e CAA section 110(a)(2) requirements for the 2008 8-h our Ozone NAAQS (2012 Ozone I-SIP Submittal). On February 19, 2015 EPA approved elements of the a bove submittals with respect to the 2008 Pb and 2008 8-h our ozone NAAQS infrastructure requirements in CAA sections 1 10(a)(2)(A),

8 In a separate rulemaking, EPA fully approved Arizo na’s SIP to address the requirements regarding air pollution emergency epis odes in CAA section 110(a)(2)(G) for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 77 F R 62452 (October 15, 2012). Although ADEQ did not submit an analysis of Section 110(a)(2)(G) requirements, we discuss them in our technical supp ort document(TSD), which is in the docket for this rulemaking.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

8 (B), (E), (F), (G), (H), (L) and (M). 9 That action also explained that we would separately act on the permitting infr astructure SIP elements in CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), (D), (J) , and (K) in a subsequent rulemaking. These permit related eleme nts are the subject of today’s final rule. In addition to the above 2011 and 2012 infrastruct ure SIP submittals, ADEQ submitted “New Source Review State Implementation Plan Submission” on October 29, 2012 , and “Supplemental Information to 2012 New Source Review State Implementation Plan Submission” on July 2, 2014 (NS R Submittals). In addition to addressing revisions t o Arizona’s NSR program, these submissions also relate to our a nalysis of infrastructure SIP elements in CAA sections 110(a)( 2)(C), (D), (J), and (K). II. Proposed Action On May 12, 2015 (80 FR 27127), EPA proposed to part ially approve and partially disapprove Arizona’s 2011 Pb I-SIP Submittal and 2012 Ozone I-SIP Submittal with respe ct to the permitting infrastructure SIP elements in CAA secti ons

9 ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of State Implementatio n Plans; Arizona; Infrastructure requirements for the 2008 Lead (Pb) and the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)’’ wa s signed on February 19, 2015 but, as of June 29, 2015, has not yet publishe d in the Federal Register. This action was proposed in the Federal Register on November 24, 2014 (79 FR 69796).This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

9 110(a)(2)(C), (D), (J), and (K). Our proposed acti on and associated technical support document (TSD) provide detailed discussion of Arizona’s demonstration for each elem ent. Generally, we proposed a partial approval because t he submittals show that Arizona largely fulfills the relevant inf rastructure requirements. But we proposed a simultaneous parti al disapproval because of these deficiencies:

• With respect to §110(a)(2)(C), EPA proposed to: (1) disapprove the 2011 Pb and 2012 Ozone Infrastructure SIPs for ADEQ and Pinal County because the SIP-approved PSD programs lack certain “structural” PSD program elements as identi fied in our TSD; and (2) disapprove both Infrastructure SIPs fo r Maricopa and Pima counties, which do not have SIP approved P SD
programs.

• With respect to the third prong of §110(a)(D)(i), E PA proposed to disapprove both Infrastructure SIPs regarding “s tructural” PSD requirements under §110(a)(2)(C).

• With respect to §110(a)(2)(D)(ii), EPA proposed to disapprove both Infrastructure SIPs with respect to Maricopa C ounty and Pima County, which do not have SIP approved PSD pro grams.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

10 • With respect to §110(a)(2)(J), we proposed to disap prove both Arizona Infrastructure SIPs for failure to fully sa tisfy the requirements of part C relating to PSD.

• With respect to §110(a)(2)(K), we proposed to disap prove both Infrastructure SIPs because ADEQ, Pinal, Pima, and Maricopa counties have not submitted adequate provisions or a narrative that explain how existing state and county law sati sfy the requirements of 110(a)(2)(K). III. Public Comments and EPA Responses The public comment period on EPA’s proposed rule op ened on May 12, 2015, the date of its publication in the Federal Register at 80 FR 27127, and closed on June 11, 2015. During this period, EPA did not receive any comments. The refore, EPA is finalizing our action as proposed. IV. Final Action Under CAA section 110(k)(3) and based on the evalua tion and rationale presented in the proposed rule, the T SD and this final rule, EPA is partially approving the 2011 Pb I-SIP Submittal and the 2012 Ozone I-SIP Submittal with r espect to the following infrastructure SIP requirements:This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

11 • Section 110(a)(2)(C) (in part): Program of enforcem ent of control measures and regulation of new and modified stationary

sources.

• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) (in part): Interstate pollu tion transport.

• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) (in part): Interstate poll ution abatement and international air pollution.

• Section 110(a)(2)(J) (in part): Consultation with government officials, public notification, PSD, and visibility protection.

• Section 110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling and subm ission of modeling data. EPA is simultaneously partially disapproving the su bmittals because of deficiencies described in our proposed r ule and TSD and summarized in the proposed rule section above. For all I-SIP elements that do not meet the CAA §110(a)(2) requir ements there are existing FIPs in place, with the exception of t he modeling requirements under CAA §110(a)(2)(K) for Pinal Coun ty and ADEQ. To the extent our proposed approval or proposed dis approval of an I–SIP element relied on our March 18, 2015 propo sed action on ADEQ’s NSR SIP submittal, our final action on the I –SIP elements identified in this notice relies on our final actio n on ADEQ’sThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

12 NSR SIP submittal, signed contemporaneously primari ly in the form of a limited approval/limited disapproval. 10 Furthermore, the partial disapprovals in this action do not resu lt in sanctions under section 179 of the Act because infr astructure SIPs are not required under Title I, Part D of the Act. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exemp ted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866, entit led “Regulatory Planning and Review.” B. Paperwork Reduction Act This action does not impose an information collecti on burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduct ion Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq . Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). C. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requ ires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requiremen ts unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a sign ificant

10 EPA’s action on ADEQ’s NSR SIP submittal was large ly finalized as proposed, with the exception of certain changes in response t o public comments. These changes resulted in our finding fewer bases for dis approval as compared with our proposed action on ADEQ’s NSR SIP submittal and do not affect today’s final action on Arizona’s I-SIP submittals.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

13 economic impact on a substantial number of small en tities. Small entities include small businesses, small not- for-profit enterprises, and small governmental jurisdictions. This rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities because SIP pa rtial approvals/partial disapprovals under section 110 an d subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any ne w requirements but simply approve requirements that t he State is already imposing. Therefore, because EPA’s approva l does not create any new requirements, I certify that this ac tion will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the Clean Air Act, preparation o f flexibility analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds . Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (19 76); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). D. Unfunded Mandates Reform ActThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

14 Under sections 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (“Unfunded Mandates Act”), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs to State, local, or t ribal governments in the aggregate; or to the private sec tor, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA must selec t the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative tha t achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with s tatutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establis h a plan for informing and advising any small governments that m ay be significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule. EPA has determined that the partial approval/partia l disapproval action promulgated does not include a F ederal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under State or l ocal law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no addit ional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the p rivate sector, result from this action. E. Executive Order 13132, FederalismThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

15 Federalism

(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) revokes and replaces Executive Orders 12612 (Federalism) and 12 875 (Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership). Exe cutive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable proces s to ensure “meaningful and timely input by State and local off icials in the development of regulatory policies that have federa lism implications.” “Policies that have federalism impl ications” is defined in the Executive Order to include regulatio ns that have “substantial direct effects on the States, on the r elationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among th e various levels of government.” Under Executive Order 13132 , EPA may not issue a regulation that has federalism implications , that imposes substantial direct compliance costs, and th at is not required by statute, unless the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by State and local governments, or EPA consults with S tate and local officials early in the process of developing the proposed regulation. EPA also may not issue a regulation th at has federalism implications and that preempts State law unless the Agency consults with State and local officials earl y in the process of developing the proposed regulation.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

16 This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national go vernment and the States, or on the distribution of power and res ponsibilities among the various levels of government, as specifie d in Executive Order 13132, because it merely approves a State rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and respo nsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requir ements of section 6 of the Executive Order do not apply to th is rule. F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments Executive Order 13175, entitled “Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments” (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), requires the EPA to develop an a ccountable process to ensure “meaningful and timely input by t ribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.” This final rule does not hav e tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175 . It will not have substantial direct effects on tribal gover nments, on the relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and respons ibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes. In addition,This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

17 the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian rese rvation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe h as demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In tho se areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal impli cations and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule. G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children f rom Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as applying only to those regulatory acti ons that concern health or safety risks, such that the analy sis required under section 5-501 of the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045, because it approves a State rule imple menting a
Federal standard. H. Executive Order 13211, Actions that Significant ly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, “Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect En ergy Supply, Distribution, or Use” (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) b ecause it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

18 I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Ac t Section 12 of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal ag encies to evaluate existing technical standards when developi ng a new regulation. To comply with NTTAA, EPA must conside r and use “voluntary consensus standards” (VCS) if available and applicable when developing programs and policies un less doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherw ise impractical. The EPA believes that VCS are inapplicable to this action. Today’s action does not require the public to perfo rm activities conducive to the use of VCS. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Addre ss Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and L ow-Income Population Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 19 94)) establishes federal executive policy on environment al justice. Its main provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make en vironmental justice part of their mission by identifying and ad dressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse hu man health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, andThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

19 activities on minority populations and low-income p opulations in the United States. EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental justice in this rulemaking. K. Congressional Review Act The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforceme nt Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submi t a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the Unit ed States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and o ther required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Fede ral Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2). This rule will be effective [insert date 30 days from date of publica tion of this document in the Federal Register]. L. Petitions for Judicial ReviewThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

20 Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petit ions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [insert date 60 days from date of publication of this docum ent in the Federal Register]. Filing a petition for reconside ration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect th e finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor d oes it extend the time within which a petition for judicial revie w may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2))
. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relat ions, Ozone, Lead, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: June 29, 2015. _________//s//__________ Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on Jun e 29,

2015. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

21 Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52 – APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATI ON PLANS 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart D – Arizona 2. Section 52.123 is amended by adding paragraphs (o) and (p) to read as follows: § 52.123 Approval status.
* * * * * (o) 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS: The SIPs submitted on October 14, 2011 and December 27, 2012 are fully or partially d isapproved for Clean Air Act (CAA) elements 110(a)(2)(C), (D)( ii), (J) and (K) for all portions of the Arizona SIP. (p) 2008 Lead (Pb) NAAQS: The SIPs submitted on October 14, 2011 and December 27, 2012 are fully or partially disapp roved for Clean Air Act (CAA) elements 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(ii), (J) and (K) for all portions of the Arizona SIP.