alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             770
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,222
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,732
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,552
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,488
<LOANS>                                         18,550
<ALLOWANCE>                                        406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,776
<DEPOSITS>                                      22,884
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 88
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  28,776
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,441
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  275
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   170
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,886
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 904
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 953
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              933
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        9
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    278
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         278
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       184
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.54
<LOANS-NON>                                        119
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     82
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   405
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  406
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               122
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            284


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Panamersa Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James E. Finegan, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ James FineganJames E. Finegan, TreasurerDated:    February 23, 2011
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.2

                           CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT

This agreement was entered into on June 1, 2001 by and between Save the World
Air Inc. (the "Company") located at 19-21 Garden Grove, Carrara 4211 Qld
Australia and Mrs. Lyn Muller of the same address.

Mrs. L. Muller has a background in secretarial and office administration and
shall provide services to the COMPANY as an independent consultant and
subsequently shall make herself available to consult with the Board of
Directors, any employees and representatives and agents of the COMPANY at
reasonable times, concerning matters pertaining to the overall business
administrative and secretarial operations of the COMPANY as well as the
organization of any administrative staff of the COMPANY and is willing to
provide secretarial services to the COMPANY.

The term of this Agreement shall be initially for one (1) year, renewable upon
written consent of both parties. It is acknowledged and agreed that no other
conditions apply to this agreement and it is further acknowledged and agreed
that remuneration for said services is irrevocable, however, if Ms. Muller
terminates this Agreement prior to its expiration, she shall return to the
Company an unearned pro-rata number of shares.

Pursuant to this Agreement, it is acknowledged and agreed by the Company that
Ms. Muller carries no professional licenses, and is not agreeing to act as a
market maker or render legal advice or perform accounting services, nor act as
an investment advisor or broker-dealer within the meaning of applicable state
and federal securities laws. It is further acknowledged and agreed by the
Company that the services provided to the Company are not rendered in connection
with the offer and sale of Securities in a capital raising transaction. Ms.
Muller shall provide services to Company as an administrative/secretarial
consultant and make herself available to consult with the board of directors,
employees and representatives and agents of the Company at reasonable times,
concerning matters pertaining to the overall business administration of the
Company, as well as the organization of any administrative staff of the Company.
Ms. Muller shall also assist in the coordination of administrative activities.

Ms. Muller will not perform any activities that could subject her or Company to
violations of Federal or applicable state securities law.

It is agreed that in remuneration for those consulting services, Lyn Muller
shall receive two hundred and fifty thousand shares of Save the World Air, Inc.
(Symbol: ZERO), issued in the name of Lynette Anne Muller.

Signed and Agreed by the Parties:

/s/ Lynette Anne Muller                      /s/ Jeffrey Muller
 ................................             ...................................
Lynette Anne Muller                          Mr. Jeffrey Muller, Chairman
                                                  Save the World Air Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkona, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Alan Rudd,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Alan Rudd
------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003
No. 99-20691 

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20691

Conference Calendar

 

DELORES MAXINE LAW,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATION KRIV CHANNEL 26 FOX; RANDY WALLACE,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CV-357

--------------------

April 13, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Delores Maxine Law (“Law”), Texas prisoner #779426, appeals

the district court’s dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as

frivolous and for failure to state a claim. The district court

determined that Law’s claims were untimely and that Law had

failed to allege that she had been deprived of a constitutional

right by a party acting under color of state law.

When it is clear from the face of an in forma pauperis

(“IFP”) complaint that the claims asserted are barred by the

applicable statute of limitations, those claims are properly
No. 99-20691 

-2-

dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 

Gonzales v. Wyatt, 157 F.3d 1016, 1019-20 (5th Cir. 1998).

Law’s § 1983 suit is subject to Texas’ two-year statute of

limitations for personal injury actions. See Tex. Civ. Prac. 

& Rem. Code Ann. § 16.003(a); see also Rodriguez v. Holmes, 963

F.2d 799, 803 (5th Cir. 1992). Under federal law, the statute of

limitations begins to run from the moment the plaintiff becomes

aware that he has suffered an injury or has sufficient

information to know that he has been injured. See Rodriguez, 963

F.2d at 803.

Since Law sustained her most recent alleged injury on

December 16, 1996, Law presumably was aware of all her injuries

by that date. Even if Law’s § 1983 complaint were deemed filed

on January 21, 1999, the date Law signed it, the complaint would

have been filed more than two years and one month after the date

on which Law’s cause of action accrued. Accordingly, it is clear

from the face of Law’s complaint that her claims were barred by

the applicable statute of limitations. Therefore, the district

court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action or in

declining to hold a Spears hearing. See Gonzales, 157 F.3d at

1019. Because the instant appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Law’s motion seeking the appointment of

counsel is denied. 

The lower court’s dismissal of Law’s complaint as frivolous

and this court’s dismissal of the appeal as frivolous count as

two “strikes” for purposes of § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.

Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). If Law accumulates
No. 99-20691 

-3-

three “strikes” under § 1915(g), she will not be able to proceed

IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while she is incarcerated

or detained in any facility unless she is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury. See id.; § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
No. 46—2316.

#### Crane Brothers’ Manufacturing Company *652v. Kraft, Gross *&*Company.

In this case there were three issues of fact: Whether the appellant made the contract sued on, whether there was a breach and what were the damages. The case was tried by'the court without a jury, and while there was a conflict of evidence on some points, an examination of the record satisfies the court that the findings of the trial court were correct.

Affirmed.

Judge below, Joseph E. Gaby.

Attorneys, for appellant, Mr. B. L. Tatham ;

for appellee, Mr. W. W. Gurley.

Opinion filed April 28, 1886.

Opinion Per Curiam.
Filed 07/22/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 163

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Ryan Michael Lindquist, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20200022

Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Ladd R. Erickson, State’s Attorney, Washburn, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; 

submitted on brief.

Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on 

brief.
1

State v. Lindquist

No. 20200022

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Ryan Lindquist appeals from a criminal judgment after entering 

conditional pleas following an order denying his motion to suppress. On 

appeal, Lindquist states his “main contention upon [his] motion to suppress 

was that because Lindquist was immediately detained at the scene . . . [his]

detention was violative of Lindquist’s Fourth Amendment rights.” While 

Lindquist makes a conclusory statement that his detention was unlawful, he 

failed to adequately develop an argument in support of this contention. The 

district court’s findings have adequate support in the record. “Our Court will 

not consider an argument that is not adequately articulated, supported, and 

briefed.” State v. Bachmeier, 2007 ND 42, ¶ 10, 729 N.W.2d 141. We

summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2),(7).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers 

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte 

Gerald W. VandeWalle
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkona, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Alan Rudd,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Alan Rudd
------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
February 17, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on
Form 10-K to which this certification is attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of
Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and
(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.

|Date: November 8, 2004 |  |                                                                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | /s/DAVID P. WALDEKName: David P. Waldek
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

---



QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mark and Kelly Hall v. Randy and Melinda Rogers

Appellate case number: 01-19-00408-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-55294

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

Appellees, Randy and Melinda Rogers, have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. 

Appellees’ motion does not comply with the rules because it omits a certificate of 

conference. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5). Moreover, appellants, Mark and Kelly Hall, filed a 

motion to extend their briefing deadline to February 6, 2020, which this Court granted. 

Accordingly, we deny appellee’s motion.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: January 9, 2020
Exhibit 10.1

KPMG


    Somekh Chaikin

    Mail address            Office address          Telephone 972 3 684 8000
    PO Box 609              KPMG Millennium Tower   Fax 972 3 684 8444
    Tel Aviv 61006          17 Ha'arba'a Street
    Israel                  Tel Aviv 64739
                            Israel



INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 26, 2003, with respect to
the financial statements of B.V.R. Systems (1998) Ltd. as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2002, in B.V.R. Systems (1998) Ltd.'s Annual Report on 20F.
This consent should not be regarded as in any way updating the aforementioned
report or representing that we performed any procedures subsequent to the date
of such report.



  /s/ Somekh Chaikin
-------------------------------------
Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
A member of KPMG International



May 4, 2003



Somekh Chaikin, a partnership registered under
the Israeli Partnership Ordinance, is a member
of KPMG International, a Swiss Association.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 19-2137

B. JANET PETTI,

Appellant

v.

OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH; 

OCEAN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT

On Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the District of New Jersey

(D.N.J. Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-07305)

District Judge: Honorable Brian R. Martinotti

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN, 

HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, 

PORTER, MATEY, and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges.

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant in the above-entitled case having 

been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the 

other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and a majority of the 

judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for 

rehearing by the Court en banc is denied. 
It is hereby ordered that the petition for rehearing by the panel is granted. The 

judges who participated in the decision of this Court will issue an amended opinion and 

judgment.

BY THE COURT,

s/ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr.

Circuit Judge

Dated: December 9, 2020

CJG/cc: B. Janet Petti

Elizabeth A. Dalberth, Esq.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LARRY BERNARD PACE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3516 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter N. Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 208 (Monday, October 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 85578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12570]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Franz Kafka'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Franz Kafka'' at The Morgan 
Library & Museum, New York, New York, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural 
significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display 
within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9fecfafcebf6f0f1adabaaa6dfecebfeebfab1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88fbedebfce1e7e6babcbdb1c8fbfce9fceda6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-24943 Filed 10-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00164-CR

JOSE MAURICIO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-03215-CRF-272

A B A T E M E N T ORDER

Appellant has filed a Motion to Substitute Counsel. We abate this case to the trial 

court for resolution of this matter. The trial court shall rule upon Appellant’s motion 

within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. After the trial court has ruled, the 

clerk of the court shall file a supplemental clerk’s record with this court within ten (10)

days.
Mauricio v. State Page 2

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray and

Justice Johnson

Appeal abated

Order delivered and filed August 4,2021

RWR/RWO
ATTACHMENT 6 

SAMPLE LETTER NOTIFYING EMPLOYEE OF TIME LIMIT WAIVER 

NAME 

ADDRESS 

Dear: 

On (date) we notified you that you were eligible to make an election under the Federal 

Erroneous Retirement Coverage Corrections Act (FERCCA). Enclosed is a copy of that 

letter. That letter provided you with the retirement coverage options you could elect and 

given 6 months to elect your coverage option. This time limit has expired and you have 

failed to make an election. Therefore the default retirement coverage is (state the default 

coverage). If you believe the reason you did not make your election within the time limit 

was for cause beyond your control, you can request a waiver of the time limit. You must 

request such a waiver in writing and submit documentation to show that you exercised 

due diligence but could not make an election within the time limit because of 

circumstances beyond your control. We will review the documentation submitted and 

provide you with a written notice of our decision. Send your request to: 

(Insert name and address for sending the waiver request). 

 

 Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

Election notification letter