alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF APPAREL VENTURES, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         101,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,661,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   598,000
<INVENTORY>                                 16,992,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,586,000
<PP&E>                                      11,775,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,458,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,187,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       39,423,000
<BONDS>                                     36,774,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,181,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,187,000
<SALES>                                     53,755,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            53,755,000
<CGS>                                       32,581,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,581,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,333,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,188,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,347,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (390,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (957,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (957,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10645]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              THE JOURNAL

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair has examined the Journal of the 
last day's proceedings and announces to the House his approval thereof.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal stands approved.

                          ____________________
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 30, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 30, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0426. WINSTON GREEN, JR. v. DEUTSCHE BANK, NATIONAL TRUST 

COMPANY.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2015SUCV1618
Exhibit 8.01  Subsidiaries  Name
  
  Jurisdiction of
  Incorporation
  
  Other names under
  which entity operates1641315 Ontario Inc.
  
  Ontario
  
  None1715495 Ontario Inc.
  
  Ontario
  
  None989093 Ontario Limited
  
  Ontario
  
  NoneAgnico-Eagle AB
  
  Sweden
  
  NoneAgnico-Eagle (Delaware) LLC
  
  Delaware
  
  NoneAgnico-Eagle
  (Delaware) II LLC
  
  Delaware
  
  NoneAgnico-Eagle
  (Delaware) III LLC
  
  Delaware
  
  NoneAgnico
  Eagle Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
  
  Mexico
  
  NoneAgnico-Eagle Oijarvi Oy
  
  Finland
  
  NoneAgnico-Eagle Sweden AB
  
  Sweden
  
  NoneAgnico-Eagle (USA) Limited
  
  Colorado
  
  NoneGenex Exploration Corp.
  
  Yukon
  
  NoneOijarvi Resources Oy
  
  Finland
  
  NoneRiddarhyttan Resources AB
  
  Sweden
  
  NoneRiddarhyttan Resources Oy
  
  Finland
  
  NoneServicios
  Agnico Eagle Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
  
  Mexico
  
  NoneServicios
  Pinos Altos, S.A. de C.V.
  
  Mexico
  
  None
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 3342-025]
 On November 30, 2022, the Briar Hydro Associates filed a new license application for the 4.6-megawatt Penacook Lower Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 3342 (project). The project is located on the Contoocook River in City of Concord, and Town of Boscawen, Merrimack County, New Hampshire. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on June 20, 2024, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the record, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to license the project.[1] The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and considered in the Commission's final licensing decision. The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members, and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or 
                    *OPP@ferc.gov.* The application will be processed according to the following schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate. Milestone
Target dateCommission issues EA
March 4, 2025.
 Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Jeanne Edwards at (202) 502-6181 or 
                    *jeanne.edwards@ferc.gov.* Dated: October 18, 2024. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         In accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations, the unique identification number for documents relating to this environmental review is EAXX-019-20-000-1729248238. 40 CFR 1501.5(c)(4) (2024). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2024-24804 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. George Baskins, Appellant.

Intoxicating Liquors; nuisance : evidence.

*Appeal from Montgomery District Court.*— Hon. H. E. Deemer, Judge.

Tuesday, May 19, 1891.

The defendant was convicted on an indictment charging him with Peeping a house for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors. He *■appeals.*

Affirmed.

*C. E. Richards, J. C. Cooper*and *Edward Mills,*for appellant.

*John Y. Stone,*Attorney General, and *R. W. Beeson,*County Attorney, for the State.

Eothrock,- J.

It is not claimed by the state that the defendant was the Peeper of an open saloon. He occupied a d welling-house with three rooms, where it is insisted that he carried on the unlawful traffic charged. There is no direct evidence of any actual sales ; but on the -eighteenth day of September, 1889, the house was searched by officers, and a jug partly filled with whisPey, and two bottles of whiskey, and ■a large number of empty bottles and some glasses which had contained beer were found in the house. The question submitted to the jury was whether liquors were Pept in the house for sale, or merely for the private use of the defendant and his family. This issue of fact is the only question presented by this appeal. We have carefully examined the evidence, and are united in the conclusion that the jury was fully warranted in finding that the defendant was guilty as charged. It would serve no useful purpose to review the evidence in an opinion.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 87432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25607]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 3:30 p.m., Thursday, November 7, 2024

PLACE: via ZOOM

STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Audit Committee of the Board of Directors 
meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in her 
opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the Government in 
the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) permit closure of the following 
portion(s) of this meeting:
<bullet> Executive (Closed) Session

Agenda

I. Call to Order
II. Sunshine Act Approval of Executive (Closed) Session
III. Executive Session: Quality Assurance Review (QAR) Report and 
Presentation by Cohn Reznick
IV. Executive Session: GAO Workplan Update
V. Executive Session: FY2024 External Audit Update
VI. Executive Session: Executive Session With Chief Audit Executive
VII. Action Item: Approval of Quality Assurance Review (QAR) by Cohn 
Reznick
VIII. Action Item: FY2025/26 Internal Audit Plan and Risk Assessment
IX. Action Item: Audit Review of Cyber-Attack Identification and 
Response
X. Discussion Item: Internal Audit Status Reports
XI. Discussion Item: Management Reports

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: Everything except the Executive (Closed) 
Session.

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: Executive (Closed) Session.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jenna Sylvester, Paralegal, (202) 
568-2560; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c061f15001a091f18091e2c021b42031e0b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e48e979d88928197908196a48a93ca8b9683">[email protected]</span></a>.

Jenna Sylvester,
Paralegal.
[FR Doc. 2024-25607 Filed 10-30-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 158 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10129]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       FIRST LIEUTENANT NOAH HARRIS ELLIJAY POST OFFICE BUILDING

  The bill (H.R. 6847) to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 801 Industrial Boulevard in Ellijay, Georgia, 
as the ``First Lieutenant Noah Harris Ellijay Post Office Building,'' 
was ordered to a third reading, read the third time, and passed.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6887
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH ANDREW SADLER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-160) Submitted: February 28, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997 Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. C. Timothy Sullivan, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, David C. Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Sadler appeals the district court's order granting the Government's motion for a under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) to reduce Sadler's sentence in light of his substantial assistance to the Government. Although the district court reduced Sadler's sentence from 400 months imprisonment to 380 months, Sadler contends that the reduction was insufficient. We dismiss Sadler's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3742(a) (West 1985 & Supp. 1997), we have jurisdiction to entertain [Sadler's] appeal only if his sentence (1) was imposed in violation of law, (2) was imposed as a result of an incorrect application ofthe Sentencing Guidelines, (3) is greater than the sentence specified in the applicable guideline range, or(4) was imposed for an offense for which there is no sentencing guideline and is plainly unreasonable. United States v. Hill, 70 F.3d 321, 323 (4th Cir. 1995) (citing 18U.S.C.A. § 3742(a)). Consistent with Congress's intent, jurisdiction under § 3742(a) is narrowly interpreted. See Hill , 70 F.3d at 323-24. After reviewing the district court's order, the parties' briefs, and the applicable law, we conclude that Sadler is unableto demonstrate any of these jurisdictional prerequisites and therefore we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1533

___________ Gregory Lew Neujahr, Citizen in * Party, * * Appellant, * *
v. * * Curtis H. Evans, County Judge, York * County Courthouse, York, Nebraska; * Alan G. Gless, District Judge, York * County Courthouse, York, Nebraska; * John C. Whitehead, District Judge, * Columbus, Nebraska; Jon Zavadil, * Platte County Sheriff and all others; * Appeal from the United States John J. Kohl, Platte County Attorney * District Court for the and all others; Brian J. Wangler, * District of Nebraska Columbus Police Department; William * Gumm, Chief, Columbus Police * [UNPUBLISHED] Department; Stan A. Emerson, * Attorney, Sipple, Hansen, Emerson & * Shumacker; Mid-East Nebraska Mental * Health, Roberta Saunders, Clinical * Director, and all others; Colin E. * Alexander, Columbus Police * Department; Roger W. Anderson, * Sheriff, Seward County Sheriff& s Office * and all others; Roger A. Jacobs, * Coroner; Christopher A. Johnson, * Attorney, Conway, Connally, Pauley, * P.C.; Kevin Schlender, Attorney; * James M. Dake, Attorney; Jo Peterson, *TheHonorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1 of N ebraska, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable David L

. Piester, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2- County Attorney, Seward County * Courthouse; Debra M. Swanson, * Attorney; Charles W. Campbell, York * County Attorney; Daniel E. Pullen, * Public Defender York County; Carlos * Monzon, Attorney; Dale Radcliff, York * County Sheriff; Dina Critel-Rathjie, * Family Counseling Center; Attorney * General, Don Stenberg; Bruce E. * Stephens, Attorney; Richard T. * Seckman, Colfax County Attorney; * Unknown Doe, 1 to 100; * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 3, 1997 Filed: September 25, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Gregory Lew Neujahr appeals from a final order of the United States Distric t Court for the District of Nebraska, dismissing his complaint with prejudice for failing 1 to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, and denying his motions for default judgme nt and for summary judgment. We have carefully reviewed the record and affirm on the basis of the district court & s opinion. See8th Cir. R. 47B.-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLE RK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1261

JOHN A. GOFF, JR., individually and as parent and next friend of his minor children, J.G., III, S.M.G., J.A.G.; CARRIE A. GOFF, individually and as parent and next friend of her minor children, J.G., III, S.M.G., J.A.G.,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

BALTIMORE COUNTY; BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOSEPH HARDEN, Officer #4984, individually and in his official capacity; AARON MAISANO, Officer #5120, individually and in his official capacity; MARGARET HEIN, Officer #4617, individually and in her offi cial capacity; DERYCK LEE, Officer #4697, individually and in his official capacity,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Susan K. Gauvey, Magistrate Judge. (1:08-cv-00557-SKG)

Submitted: June 11, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.John A. Goff, Jr., Carrie A. Goff, Appellants Pro Se. Paul M. Mayhew, Assistant Counsel, BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM:

John A. Goff, Jr. and Carrie A. Goff appeal the

magistrate judge’s order entering judgment for Defendants in

accordance with the jury’s verdict. * The Goffs brought suit

alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and Maryland law.

The Goffs have not provided a transcript, and they fail to

establish a basis to have the transcript prepared at government

expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2006). We have reviewed the

existing record and the issues the Goffs raise on appeal, and

find no grounds for appellate relief. Accordingly, we affirm

the magistrate judge’s order. Goff v. Baltimore County , No.

1:08-cv-00557-SKG (D. Md. Feb. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

BRYAN PERRY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 163 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration and decision of this matter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 24, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 534 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-157, K2025-155.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25306 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                         Aero Systems Engineering, Inc.


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Annual Report of Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 (the
"Report"), of Aero Systems Engineering, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2002, I, Charles H. Loux, President and CEO of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     3.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     4.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     Date: April 28, 2003

                                           By: /s/ Charles H. Loux
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Charles H. Loux
                                               President and CEO
                                               Aero Systems Engineering, Inc.

                                       19