alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.4

ARTICLE   5
LEGEND
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
STOLT-NIELSEN S.A. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
LEGEND
MULTIPLIER   1,000

<Table>
<S>                                          <C>
PERIOD-TYPE                                       12-MOS
FISCAL-YEAR-END                              NOV-30-2000
PERIOD-START                                 DEC-01-1999
PERIOD-END                                   NOV-30-2000
CASH                                              28,770
SECURITIES                                             0
RECEIVABLES                                      396,757
ALLOWANCES                                        12,455
INVENTORY                                        165,655
CURRENT-ASSETS                                   756,379
PP&E                                           3,662,610
DEPRECIATION                                   1,111,955
TOTAL-ASSETS                                   3,727,303
CURRENT-LIABILITIES                              803,305
BONDS                                          1,349,469
PREFERRED-MANDATORY                                    0
PREFERRED                                              0
COMMON                                            31,884
OTHER-SE                                       1,063,948
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY                     3,727,303
SALES                                                  0
TOTAL-REVENUES                                 2,268,630
CGS                                                    0
TOTAL-COSTS                                    1,984,736
OTHER-EXPENSES                                         0
LOSS-PROVISION                                         0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                                 111,681
INCOME-PRETAX                                      2,979
INCOME-TAX                                        15,374
INCOME-CONTINUING                                (12,395)
DISCONTINUED                                           0
EXTRAORDINARY                                          0
CHANGES                                                0
NET-INCOME                                       (12,395)
EPS-BASIC                                          (0.23)
EPS-DILUTED                                        (0.23)
</Table>
State of Calif or nia

HEAL TH AND SAFETY CODE

Section 41210

41210. (a) There is hereby created the Moja v e Desert Air Quality Management District. (b) The boundaries of the Moja v e Desert district shall include all of the County of San Bernardino and the County of Ri v erside that is not included within the boundaries of the south coast district, and an y other area included pursuant to subdi vision (c). (c) The Moja v e Desert district board may , by resolution, include in the Moja v e Desert district an y other area upon receipt of a resolution from the district that currently includes the area requesting inclusion and specifying the area to be included. All territory included within the Moja v e Desert district shall be contiguous. (Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 872, Sec. 100. Ef fecti v e January 1, 1997.)
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkona, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Alan Rudd,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Alan Rudd
----------------------------
    Alan Rudd
    Chief Executive Officer
    November 14, 2002
#### STATE v. JAMES H. MILLER.

*Appeal.*

Where in. a criminal proceeding, the prisoner appealed from the judgment, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court, and upon receiving the certificate the Judge of the Superior Court passed the same sentence which had before been imposed, from which the defendant again appealed, but without assigning any error or showing any new facts, the appeal will be dismissed.

*{State*v. *Speafts,*95 N. C., 689; cited and approved).

*451Indictment, heard by *Philips, Judge,*at July Criminal Term, 1886, of Wake Superior Court.

The facts appear in the opinion.

*The Attorney- General,*for the State.

*Messrs. John Gatling, E. G. Smith, T. C. Fuller*and *George H. Snow,*for the defendant.

Smith, C. J.

Upon the hearing of the appeal from the judgment rendered against the defendant, at February Term, 1886, it was declared there was no error. Upon receiving the certificate of the decision in this Court, the presiding Judge of the Superior Court pronounced the same sentence, and the defendant again undertook to appeal, and the transcript of the record sent up contains no assignment of error, but certain testimony is transmitted, upon’which no action was had, other than the rendition of judgment. The case is not distinguished from that of *State*v. *Speaks,*95 N. C., 689, and the same disposition must be made of the appeal by dismissing it. So ordered.

Dismissed.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                       |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date:       November 15, 2010 | /s/      Frederick L. Hickman              |
|                               | Frederick      L. Hickman                  |
|                               | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

----
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of R.V.B. Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Ofer Naveh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
This Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: July 26, 2012





/s/ Ofer NavehOfer Naveh

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the quarterly report of Nanobac Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 18, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
John D. Stanton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.





/s/ John D. Stanton
-------------------
John D. Stanton

Chief Executive Officer

August 18, 2003
EX-4.20 AGREEMENT - SURRENDER OF STOCK OPTIONS - EMPLOYEES

                                                              September 11, 2001

         The undersigned is the holder of options to purchase _________________
shares of common stock ("Options") of ConSyGen, Inc. (the "Company"). The
agreement(s) evidencing the Options are hereby amended to (i) reduce the
exercise price to $_____ per share, (ii) increase option shares to purchase to
_______________, and (iii) provide that the Options shall not be exercisable
until such time as the Company increases to at least 125,000,000 the number of
its authorized but unissued shares of common stock and completes an S-8
registration.

         In the event the employee is laid off by CSGI prior to the increase in
the authorized shares becoming effective, the employee will have nine months
from the day the increase becomes effective to exercise their options.

         Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by countersigning
this letter where indicated below and returning a copy to the undersigned.
Except as modified hereby, the agreement(s) evidencing Options shall remain in
full force and effect.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             By: _______________________________

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
ConSyGen, Inc.

By:  ____________________________________
     Eric J. Strasser, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84917-84918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4830-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Georgia; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4830-DR), dated September 30, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 9, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include permanent work 
under the Public Assistance program for the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared 
a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 30, 
2024.

    Dodge, Hancock, Thomas, Warren Counties for Individual 
Assistance.
    Appling, Atkinson, Bacon, Burke, Coffee, Effingham, Jeff Davis, 
Jenkins, Pierce, Screven, and Ware Counties for permanent

[[Page 84918]]

work [Categories C-G] (already designated for Individual Assistance 
and assistance for debris removal and emergency protective measures 
[Categories A and B], including direct Federal assistance, under the 
Public Assistance program).
    Brantley, Mitchell, and Worth Counties for Public Assistance, 
including direct Federal assistance.
    Wayne County for Public Assistance, including direct Federal 
assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24687 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT In re : KAR

EN M IC HELE R OZIER , De

btor, KAREN M IC H ELE R OZIER , Appe lla

nt, v. U.S. B ANK N.A., Appe lle e . No. 13-60106 B AP No. 12-1359 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Ninth C irc uit B ankruptc y

Appe lla te Pane l Kirsc he r, Pa

ppa s, a nd Dunn, B ankruptc y Judge s, Pre siding Subm itte d: De c e m

be r 9, 2015 ** B e fore : W ALLAC E, R AW LINSON, a

n d IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. Kare n M i c he le R oz ie r a

p pe a ls pro se from

the B ankruptc y

Appe lla te Pane l’ s 

# FIL ED DEC 16 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).(“ B AP” ) judgm e nt a ffirm ing the ba nkruptc y c ourt’ s orde r gran ting U.S. B ank N.A.’ s m otion for re lie f from sta y with re spe c t

to c e rta in re a l prope rty . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 158(d). W e re vie w de novo B AP de c isions, a nd a pply the sa m e sta nda rd of re vie w tha

t the B AP a

p plie d to the ba

nk ruptc y c ourt’ s ruling. Boy ajian v . N

e w Falls C orp. ( In re Boy ajian ), 564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a ffirm . U.S. B ank ha d sta

n ding to se e k re lie f from

the a utom atic sta

y with re spe c t to c e rta in re a l prope rty

be c a u se U.S. B ank e sta

blishe d tha

t it ha d a c olora ble c la im to the p rope rty . Se e Ark

ison v . Griffin (

In reGriffin ), 719 F.3d 1126, 1128 (9th C ir. 2013) (pe r c uriam ) (“ [B ] e c a use fina l a djudic ation of thepa rtie s’ rights a

n d lia bilitie s is y e t to oc c ur, a

pa rty se e king sta

y re lie f ne e d

only e sta blish tha t it ha s a c olora ble c la im to the prope rty

at issue .” ); se e also May

f ie ld v . Unite d

State s , 599 F.3d 964, 970 (9th C ir. 2010) (“ Standing is a que s tion of la

w tha t we re vie wde novo.” ). W e re je c t R oz ie r’ s c onte ntions re ga rding thea lle ge d bia s of the ba nkruptc y c ourt judgeand a

m e m b e r of the B AP. R oz ie r’ s re que st for judic ia l notic e is de nie d. AFFIRM E D .

1 3 - 6 0 1 0 6 2
#### STATE *vs.*B. W. BELL.

The sale of a quart of spirituous liquor, under an agreement that the seller was to retain it in a separate vessel, and the buyer to have access to it when ho pleased, under which agreement the buyer drank the whole at various times, (there being no finding that it was an artifice to evade the Statute) is not within the Act of Assembly.

INDICTMENT for retailing spirits by the small measure, with*338out a license, tried before bis Honor Judge SauudeRS, at the last Superior Court of Macon county.

*Attorney*General, for the State.

Williams, for the defendant.

Nash, C. J.

The defendant is indicted for selling spirits by the retail without having a license therefor. Cunningham purchased of him a quart of spirituous liquors, for which he paid him the price, and it was agreed that the spirituous liquors should be put into a decanter for the purchaser, who should be at liberty to drink it by the glass as he might call for it, and under this arrangement Cunningham drank up the quart. His Honor was of opinion that the defendant violated the Act under which he was prosecuted. In this opinion we do not concur.

The Act creating the offense provides against retailing “ spirituous liquors by the small measure, that is to say in quantities less than a quart without a license.” In the case, *State*v. Kirkham, 1 Ire. Rep. 384, the Court said, if the contract between the parties had been that the seller should deliver a quart of spirits, *which yoarticula/r quart*should thereupon become the property of the purchaser, although the seller, by agreement, was to retain it *for the*qqwchaser, so as to be used by the latter, from time to time, as he might require, we suppose that such a contract (unless perhaps it were found by the jury that there was an intent thereby to evade the statute) must have been held to be a contract for the sale of a quart. In the case now under consideration, the particular quart became the property of the purchaser upon the price being paid : it was placed in a decanter separated from the rest of the spirits, to be used by the purchaser at his pleasure, and he might at any time have taken away the whole without the consent of the seller, and either carried it home or deposited it elsewhere. His Honor below did not avail himself of the doubt expressed by the Court in Kirkham’s case : he did not leave it to the jury to say whether the contract between the parties *339■was made with a yiew to evade the statute: that question is not before us, and we express no opinion upon it: but his Honor held that the facts proved in the case brought it within the operation of the statute. In this there is error, and a *venire de novo*is awarded.

Pee CukiaM. Judgment reversed.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Resource Bankshares Corporation

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 of Resource Bankshares Corporation of our report dated February 2, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Resource Bankshares Corporation
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three year period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the
December 31, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10K of Resource Bankshares Corporation.




Norfolk, Virginia
March 24, 2000
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jose Guadalupe Contreras, Jr.

, * From the 10 6th District

Court of Gaines County,

Trial Court No. 12

- 4279

.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 002 30

- CR * January 30, 2014

T he State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal

is dismiss ed.
#### Chas. D. Goldsmith, Appellant, v. H. L. Wilson, Sheriff, et *al.,*Appellees.

Appeal from Order oh Demurrer: practice.

*Appeal from, Sac District Court.*— Hon. J. H. Macomber, Judge.,

Friday, January 30, 1891.

This action was commenced in 1884. It was tried in the district court, and a judgment was rendered for the defendants. The plaintiff appealed to this court, and the judgment was reversed. After the cause was remanded to the district court the defendant sought to have a change of forum to the circuit court of the United States, The *721application therefor was granted. The cause was afterwards remanded to the district court. The action on the application of defendants was continued for several successive terms. .The last application for continuance was made on the second day of October, 1888, and it was overruled, The active counsel in the case were not present. Resident counsel, who it appears had nothing to do with the management of the case, withdrew their appearance, and the plaintiff introduced his evidence, made material amendments to his petition and took judgment for the sum of eighty-three hundred and thirty-eight dollars and forty cents, and two hundred and twenty-four dollars costs. The defendants appeared on the first day of the next term, and on their motion the record entry of judgment was corrected, but the correction was not in any matter material to the present appeal. Three days later the defendants filed a petition for a new trial. This petition was after-wards amended. The petition was in several counts. The defendants demurred to the several counts of the petition. The demurrer was overruled as to some of the counts, and sustained as to the others. The plaintiff appeals from the order overruling the demurrer as to some of the *counts.*— Dismissed.

*Chas. D. Goldsmith,*for appellant.

*John Gibbons, Wright, Baldwin <& Haldane*and *JBiwood & Zane,*for appellees.

Rothrock, J.

We have stated the history of the case somewhat at length, to the end that the ground on which we dispose of the appeal may be fairly understood. When the demurrer was overruled, no further proceedings were had in the case. It appears that by consent the case was to stand continued until this appeal shall be determined. Appellees contend that an appeal cannot be taken from such an order, and they move to dismiss the appeal upon that ground. We think the motion must be sustained. The appellant did not elect to stand on the ruling on the demurrer, and the consent to continue the case, that appellant might have the opportunity of appealing to this court, that he might try the question of law, and leave the case undis-posed of in the court below, gave appellant no additional right. Appellate jurisdiction is conferred on this court by law, and not by the consent of the parties. The case of *Seipple v. Blake,*80 Iowa, 142, appears to us to be decisive of this appeal.

The appeal will be dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                                 USB CAPITAL IV

     THIS Certificate of Amendment of USB Capital IV (the "Trust"), is being
duly executed and filed by the undersigned trustee to amend a business trust
formed under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss. 3801 et seq.).

     1. Name. The name of the business trust amended hereby is USB Capital IV.

     2. Amendment of Trust. The Certificate of Trust of the Trust is hereby
amended by changing the name and address of the Trustee in the State of Delaware
to:

          First Union Trust Company, National Association
          One Rodney Square
          920 King Street, Suite 102
          Wilmington, Delaware 19801

     3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Amendment shall be effective upon
filing.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned trustee of the Trust has executed this
Certificate of Amendment in accordance with Section 3811(a)(2) of the Act.




                                       /s/ Lee R. Mitau
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                  Name:    Lee R. Mitau
                                           not in his individual capacity but
                                           solely as Administrative Trustee