alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JAMES CAMERON *vs.*HENRY MASON *&*AL.

A vendor, who has parted with his title to land,.has no equitable lien-on tho land for the purchase money.

The case of *Womble*v. *Battle,*3 Ire. Eq. 182 cited and approved.

Cause transmitted by consent to the Supreme Court from the Court of Equity of Cumberland County, at the Spring Term 1851.

In 1842 the plaintiff sold to the defendant Mason apiece 1 of land in fee for $700, payable in three annual instalments, for which the purchaser gave his three promisory notes. In a few months afterwards the plaintiff let Mason into possession and made him a deed, and the latter then agreed to give new notes with sureties for the price in some short time. In December 1842, and March 1843, Mason made payments to the amount of nearly $200, on the first instalment. But he never gave new notes; and in May 1843 he sold the premises to the other defendant and conveyed them to him. In July following this bill was filed, charging the insolvency of Mason, and that McCormick was fully informed of the terms of the agreement between the plaintiff and Mason, and knew, at the time he purchased, that Mason had not paid the purchase money, nor given notes with sureties for it; and praying a declaration, that the plaintiff is entitled to a lien on the land in the hands of McCormick for the balance due to the plaintiff therefor, and for a decree, in default of payment by. one of the defendants, to have the money raised out of the land and for. general relief.

*Strange,*for the plaintiff.

*TV. Winslow,*for the- defendant.

*181Ruffin, C, J.

It is not necessary to consider the answers, as, upon the authority of *Womble v. Battle, 3*Ire. Eq. 182, the bill is insufficient upon its face, as far as it seeks to set up an equitable lien for the purchase money. This bill was filed before that decision; but in that aspect it is fully answered by i't The Counsel, however, contended; that there were circumstances to establish a pre-contract or collusion between the defendants, to the effect, that Mason should make the purchase for the purpose of conveying to McCormick at a less price, so that thereby McCormick might get the premises at an under value and the plaintiff defeated of a large part of the price by reason of Masons insolvency. But, without undertaking to determine the effect of such a state of facts, if existing, the Court is obliged to say, that the supposed facts are not only not established by proof, but they are not sufficiently alleged in the bill <o authorise a declaration of them, nor a decree on them»

Pee Cukiam. Bill dismissed with costs.
#### GASHINE, EMORY & CO. *v.*BAER & EPPLER.

An affidavit which alleges, as grounds for an attachment, that the affiant “ believes that the defendants have disposed of their property and are still doing so, with the intent to defraud their creditors also, that “the defendants being largely indebted, if not insolvent, have sold and are selling their large stock of goods, at less than the cost of the same, in the city of New York, and have disposed of other valuable property for cash,” is not only sufficient, but very full and explicit.

*(Hughes*v. *Person,*63 N. C. 548 cited and approved.)

Motion to set aside a warrant of attachment, made before *Thomas, J.,*at January Special Term 1870, of Craven Court.

*109The motion was based upon the alleged insufficiency of the affidavit, which, in the part impeached, was: “4th, That affiant has reason to believe, and that he does believe, that the defendants have disposed of their property, and are still doing so, with the intent to defraud their creditors; 5th, That the grounds of his belief are, that the defendants being largely indebted, if not insolvent, have sold and are rapidly selling, their large stock of goods at less than the cost of the same in the city of New York, and have disposed of other valuable property recently for cash.”

His Honor refused to make the order applied for, and the defendants appealed.

*Manly*& *Haughton*for the appellants.

*Oreen and*Mason, *contra.*

Settle, J.

The defendants objected to the sufficiency of the affidavit upon which this attachment is founded.

The objection was properly overruled, as the affidavit is not only sufficient, hut very full and explicit in stating facts, which make out a *prima facie*case.

The matter is discussed in the late case of *Hughes*v. *Person,*63 N. C. 548, and we will content ourselves with a reference to that case.

Per Curiam:. Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 688 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 688

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to reauthorize the Overseas 
                    Private Investment Corporation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF OPIC AUTHORITIES.

    Section 235(a)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2195(a)(2)) is amended by striking ``1999'' and inserting ``2003''.

            Passed the Senate November 3, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 688

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to reauthorize the Overseas 
                    Private Investment Corporation.
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 572

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from issuing regulations dealing

with hybrid transactions.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 10, 1999

Mr. BREAUX (for himself and Mr. MACK) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from issuing

regulations dealing with hybrid transactions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HYBRID TRANSACTIONS UNDER SUBPART F.

4 (a) PROHIBITION ON REGULATIONS.—The Secretary

5 of the Treasury (or his delegate)—

6 (1) shall not issue temporary or final regula7 tions relating to the treatment of hybrid transactions

8 under subpart F of part III of subchapter N of

9 chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 pur10 suant to Internal Revenue Service Notice 98–35 or
2

•S 572 IS

1 any other regulations reaching the same or similar

2 result as such notice,

3 (2) shall retroactively withdraw any regulations

4 described in paragraph (1) which were issued after

5 the date of such notice and before the date of the

6 enactment of this Act, and

7 (3) shall not modify or withdraw sections

8 301.7701–1 through 301.7701–3 of the Treasury

9 Regulations (relating to the classification of certain

10 business entities) in a manner which alters the treat11 ment of hybrid transactions under such subpart F.

12 (b) STUDY AND REPORT.—The Secretary of the

13 Treasury (or his delegate) shall study the tax treatment

14 of hybrid transactions under such subpart F and submit

15 a report to the Committee on Ways and Means of the

16 House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance

17 of the Senate. The Secretary shall hold at least one public

18 hearing to receive comments from any interested party

19 prior to submitting such report.

Æ
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, the undersigned officer of ING Insurance Company of America (the “Company”)hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| November 12, 2004 |   | By     | /s/  David A. Wheat                                  |
|-------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| (Date)            |   |   |                                                           | David A. Wheat |
|              |   |   | Director, Senior Vice  President, and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                  10,312,219
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                           21,484,119
<ALLOWANCES>                             4,244,180
<INVENTORY>                              4,705,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        38,891,133
<PP&E>                                 131,213,985
<DEPRECIATION>                          19,973,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         343,019,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  144,382,277
<BONDS>                                  7,383,659
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                    348
<COMMON>                                    20,819
<OTHER-SE>                             191,232,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           343,019,841
<SALES>                                 71,438,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        71,438,099
<CGS>                                   63,923,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          109,192,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        (1,009,034)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       3,851,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (40,597,238)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (40,597,238)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                           (40,597,238)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (4.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (4.21)


</TABLE>
II

Calendar No. 111

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 559

To designate the Federal building located at 300 East 8th Street in Austin,

Texas, as the ‘‘J.J. ‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 8, 1999

Mr. GRAMM (for himself and Mrs. HUTCHISON) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

MAY 12, 1999

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 300 East 8th

Street in Austin, Texas, as the ‘‘J.J. ‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal Building located at 300 East 8th Street

5 in Austin, Texas, shall be known and designated as the

6 ‘‘J.J. ‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.
2

•S 559 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘J.J. ‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.

Calendar No. 111

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 559

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 300

‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.East 8th Street in Austin, Texas, as the ‘‘J.J.

MAY 12, 1999

Reported without amendment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          51,001
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  180,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,453
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,505
<PP&E>                                         365,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                 164,029
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 753,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          806,295
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,827
<OTHER-SE>                                     333,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   753,877
<SALES>                                      1,023,091
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,023,091
<CGS>                                          251,566
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  251,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               844,519
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (146,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (146,356)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (146,356)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
### KEN**PAXTON ATTORNEY** **(il-.M-RAI. OF** **MX AS Jason** **ContheraS Assistant** **Attorney General** **General Litigation** **Division Fax:** **(512)320-0667 Jason.** **Contreras@toxasaaorneygeneial. go** **May 11.2015** 

### ATTN:**Keith E.** **Hottle, Clerk** **of the** **Court Fourth** **Court of** **Appeals 300** **Dolorosa, Suite** **3200 San** **Antonio, Texas** **78205-3037**

### RE:**Court of** **Appeals Number:** **04-14-00922-CV Trial** **Court Case** **Number: 2010-CI-12625** **Style: John** **E. Rodarte** **v. Texas** **Department ofFamily** **and Protective** **Service Dear** **Mr. Hottle:** 

### We**would like** **to request** **that you** **please send** **use the** **entire record** **on appeal** **in the** 

### above**referenced case** **so that** **we can** **file our** **Appellee's brief** **in this** **mailer. Please** **forward it** 

## overnight**to Texas** **Attorney General's** **Office. ATTN:** **JASON T.** **CONTRERAS, 300** **West 15lh** **Street, Ith** **Floor. Austin,** **Texas 78701,512-463-2120.** **Our Federal** **Express number** **is 1751-1256-1.** **If the** **record is** **available electronically,** **please email** **to my** **legal assistant,** **Katrina Shanks** **at Kali-ina.Shanks@.lcxasattorneyi:enerai.wv** 

### Thank**you for** **your prompt** **cooperation in** **this matter.** **Regards, /sf** **Jason Conlreras** **Jason Contreras** **Assistant Attorney General** **cc: Client** **Co cr,** **I'ust Office** **Box 1254H.** **Ah si** **in. Texas** **7K711-2548 <M2)** **463-2IO0 www** **lexesaiiorncygcneral.go'v**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 24, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 390 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-89, K2025-87.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24612 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<pre>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Vote Power Corporation
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: July 6, 2005                By:  /S/ Bob Martyn
                                   -------------------------
                                   Bob Martyn
                                   President
                                   (principal executive officer)



Dated: July 6, 2005                By:  /S/ Inti Shaikh
                                   -------------------------
                                   Inti Shaikh
                                   Secretary/Treasurer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 518

For the relief of Patricia E. Krieger of Port Huron, Michigan.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 3, 1999

Mr. ABRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Patricia E. Krieger of Port Huron,

Michigan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CHECKS FOR MILITARY PAY.

4 (a) PAYMENT.—Notwithstanding the time limitations

5 set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of section 3702 of title

6 31, United States Code, or any other provision of law,

7 upon submission of the checks described in subsection (b)

8 to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service not later

9 than 12 months from the date of enactment of this Act,

10 the Secretary of Defense shall pay the face amount of the

11 checks to Patricia E. Krieger of Port Huron, Michigan,
2

•S 518 IS

1 the mother of the late Staff Sergeant Patrick J. Feehan,

2 United States Air Force.

3 (b) CHECKS DESCRIBED.—The checks referred to in

4 subsection (a) are 17 checks in the total amount of

5 $9,531.83 issued during the period beginning November

6 30, 1982, and ending April 4, 1984, by the United States

7 to Staff Sergeant Patrick J. Feehan, as payment of the

8 base pay and allowances to which Staff Sergeant Feehan

9 was entitled as a member of the Air Force, having been

10 given to Patricia E. Krieger by Staff Sergeant Feehan be11 fore his death.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas R. McMahon, Vice President
and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/S/     THOMAS R.
MCMAHON                   
|Thomas R. McMahon                           
|Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)



March 25, 2011