alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20469 and #20470; CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION Disaster Number WA-20009]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation (FEMA-4823-DR), dated September 24, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Wildfires.                    

      ( print page 85274)    

# DATES:

Issued on October 21, 2024.

*Incident Period:*                         June 22, 2024, through July 8, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         December 16, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         June 24, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, dated September 24, 2024, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to December 16, 2024.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-24916 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 698

To review the suitability and feasibility of recovering costs of high altitude

rescues at Denali National Park and Preserve in the state of Alaska,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24, 1999

Mr. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To review the suitability and feasibility of recovering costs

of high altitude rescues at Denali National Park and

Preserve in the state of Alaska, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That no later than nine months after the enactment of

4 this Act, the Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred

5 to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall complete a report on the suit6 ability and feasibility of recovering the costs of high alti7 tude rescues on Mt. McKinley, within Denali National

8 Park and Preserve. The Secretary shall also report on the

9 suitability and feasibility of requiring climbers to provide
2

S 698 IS

1 proof of medical insurance prior to the issuance of a climb2 ing permit by the National Park Service. The report shall

3 also review the amount of fees charged for a climbing per4 mit and make such recommendations for changing the fee

5 structure as the Secretary deems appropriate. Upon com6 pletion, the report shall be submitted to the Committee

7 on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, and the

8 Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives.

Æ
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2216-E2217]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  HONORING MAUREEN GAVIN FOR THE 2007-08 OUTSTANDING TEACHING OF THE 
                            HUMANITIES AWARD

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. KENNY MARCHANT

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, October 3, 2008

  Mr. MARCHANT. Madam Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to Maureen 
Gavin of Southlake, Texas, who was awarded the 2007-08 Outstanding 
Teaching of the Humanities Award on behalf of Humanities Texas. This 
award honors K-12 humanities teachers in the state of Texas who make 
exemplary contributions in teaching, curriculum development and 
extracurricular programming.
  Mrs. Gavin, a former sixth grade English teacher at Eubanks 
Intermediate School in Southlake, currently works with Morningside 
Elementary School in Fort Worth.
  In the words of Mrs. Gavin, ``All good thinking begins with good 
questioning, and as a humanities teacher it is my responsibility to 
provide provocative questions that allow my students to dig deep within 
themselves as they learn about our world, past and present, and how 
they fit into it''. In this spirit, Mrs. Gavin brings to the classroom 
a passion for literature, language, and the ever-growing continuum of 
knowledge.

[[Page E2217]]

  One example of this passion was displayed when Mrs. Gavin's students 
read the book Maniac Magee by Jerry Spinelli, the story of a homeless 
orphan who makes a positive difference in the lives of other. With the 
guidance and encouragement of Mrs. Gavin, her students created a ``Kids 
Helping Kids'' initiative that ultimately raised $2,000 to support kids 
in need. This is just one shining example of how the passion of Mrs. 
Gavin's teaching translates to a world far larger than the walls of a 
classroom.
  Among Mrs. Gavin's many accomplishments include: Carroll Independent 
School District (CISD) Teacher of the Year, Eubanks Intermediate School 
Teacher of the Year, EPISD Teacher of the Year Top Ten Finalist, Carlos 
Rivera's Teacher of the Year, W.W. Bushman Teacher of the Year, 
presenter CISD parent University, creator of the sixth grade language 
arts curriculum, former member of the CISD language arts vertical team, 
former language arts department chairperson, and many, many more.
  Madam Speaker, it is a special honor to present Mrs. Maureen Gavin 
the Outstanding Teaching of the Humanities Award. Educators in the 
humanities like Mrs. Gavin advance not just the knowledge of life, but 
the critical importance of reflection, wide-angle perspective, and the 
wisdom of a larger world. As her former school's Member of Congress, I 
am especially proud that we have teachers like her who enlighten our 
students in the arts, history, and languages; ultimately emboldening 
our nation's cultural framework as well as our future.

                          ____________________
```
#### State, Respondent, vs. Tyler, Appellant.

*April 9*

May *5, 1942.*

*Nathaniel D. Rothstein*and *Roy 0. Conen,*both of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by the *Attorney General, Herbert I. Steffes,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, and *Andrew W. Bnmhart,*assistant district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Brunhart.*

Rosenbérry, C. J.

The sole question raised upon this appeal is whether the evidence sustains the finding of the trial *488court. It is contended by the defendant, (1) that his conduct negatives any intent on his part to use force to accomplish his purpose; (2) that the circumstances show that he never intended to commit the offense; and (3) that intent is the gist of the offense. We have carefully examined the record in this case and we are of the opinion that the evidence offered and received upon the trial is ample to sustain the finding of the trial court. No useful purpose would be served by setting out the details of the evidence and for that reason they will be omitted.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, November 6, 2024—11 a.m.

# PLACE:

Meeting will take place remotely and in person at 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland, Room 420.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting—Closed to the Public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

*Meeting Matter:*                         Briefing Matter.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Alberta E. Mills, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (Cell).

Dated: October 30, 2024.

Alberta Mills,

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-25652 Filed 10-31-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
AFS-10-136-E April 1, 2010

Mr. William Heiss Flight Training Manager Front Range Executive Flight Training 98 S. Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 127-131 Lakewood, CO 80226

Dear Mr. Heiss:

This is in response to your October 2, 2009, letter (public Docket No. FAA-2009-0944) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administrati on (FAA) on behalf of Front Range Executive Flight Training (Front Range) for an exemption from § 61.43(a)(5) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Front Range to allow an applicant seeking an initial Cessna CE-500 series type rati ng to demonstrate single-pilot competency during a practical test in a CE-500 series airplane th at is type-certi ficated only for a two-pilot crew.

Section 61.43(b) states that if the FAA Fli ght Standardization Board report, FAA-approved aircraft flight manual, or airc raft type certificati on data sheet allows the pilot flightcrew complement to be either a single pilot, or a pilot and a copilot, then the applicant may demonstrate single-pilot proficie ncy or have a copilot on the practical test. Section 61.45 states that the applicant must furnish an aircra ft of the same category, class, and type. All

Cessna Citation 500 series aircraft have a common type rating de signation. There are

15 Cessna Citation models that are included in the CE-500 type rating. Two of those models are approved for a crew of either one or tw o. Cessna Aircraft Comp any has issued CE-500 series Service Bulletins (SL-500-03-01, SL560- 03-01) (copy enclosed) regarding required flight control systems for single-pi lot operations. Therefore, no re gulatory relief is required to allow an applicant to demonstrate single-pilot pr oficiency during a type ra ting practical test in a Cessna CE-500 series aircraft requiring a sec ond in command (SIC), provided a qualified

SIC is also seated at the cont rols during the practical test a nd the aircraft is equipped in accordance with the appropriate Cessna Service Bulletins. Please note that demonstrating single-pilot proficiency in a Cessna CE-500 seri es aircraft requiring a SIC does not authorize the applicant to operate such aircraft as single-pilot only.2

Therefore, the FAA deems it unnecessary to gr ant Front Range Executiv e Flight Training an exemption from § 61.43(a)(5) as relief is already provided under § 61.43.

Because the relief you seek is covered under an existing rule, we will take no further action on your petition. Accordingly, we w ill close Docket No. FAA-2009-0944.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,131,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,181,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (71,290)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,586,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,060,928
<PP&E>                                       1,636,452
<DEPRECIATION>                               (127,412)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,474,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,039,855
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        380
<COMMON>                                         3,936
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,436,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,474,332
<SALES>                                      3,770,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,770,920
<CGS>                                      (2,525,358)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (1,631,798)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,070
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,303)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (359,469)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,655
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (323,958)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (323,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-15098

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00009-RS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

MICHAEL D. NEELY, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(July 10, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 13-15098 Date Filed: 07/10/2014 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Michael D. Neely in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals 

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Neely’s convictions and 

sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-15098 Date Filed: 07/10/2014 Page: 2 of 2
#### Edwards, Respondent, vs. Central Chevrolet Sales Company and others, Defendants: Hardware Mutual Casualty Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Cannon & Meister*of West Bend, attorneys, and *William A. Hayes*of Milwaukee of counsel.

For the respondent: *Edward M. Goemans*and *G. Russell Crotty,*both of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *C. J. Schloemer*of West Bend of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NIC Inc. (the
Company) each hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 17, 2008

|/s/ HARRY H. HERINGTON 
|-----------------------
|HARRYH. HERINGTON      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ STEPHEN M. KOVZAN  
|STEPHENM. KOVZAN       
|Chief Financial Officer

89

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6622** 

KASEAN DAMONT BRYSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. SID HARKLEROAD , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Distri ct of North Carolina , at Asheville
. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00036

- GCM )

Submitted : December 16, 2010 Decided: December 27, 2010

Before GREGO R Y , DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opi nion
. Kasean Damont Bryson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kasean Damont Bryson seeks to a ppeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealabil ity will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists wou ld find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural
grou nds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bryson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before t he court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10422-S10423]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            LOUISA SWAIN DAY

  Mr. NELSON of Nebraska. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that 
the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of H. Con. Res. 378, 
which was received from the House.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the concurrent 
resolution by title.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       A concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 378) expressing 
     support for designation of September 6, 2008, as Louisa Swain 
     Day.

  There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the 
concurrent resolution.

[[Page S10423]]

  Mr. NELSON of Nebraska. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that 
the resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, the motion to 
reconsider be laid upon the table, and that any statements related to 
the resolution be printed in the Record.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 378) was agreed to.
  The preamble was agreed to.

                          ____________________
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Unisys Corporation Under Contract No. GS-09F-0038Z

T.O. NNL06AA74T APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61478

Catherine P. Palazzolo, Esq.

Assistant General Counsel Scott W. Barber, Esq.

NASA ChiefTrial Attorney Dacia K. Bruns, Esq.

Trial Attorney Hampton, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 14 February 2018

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61478, Appeal ofUnisys Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN D. JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3775

[March 11, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Daliah H. Weiss, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2018-CF011867-AXXX-WB.

Rachael E. Reese of O’Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Tampa, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.