alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; NHLBI Institutional Training Mechanism Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         December 6, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge I, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michael P. Reilly, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 208-Z, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-7975, email:                         *reillymp@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 86344)    
 Dated: October 25, 2024.

Bruce A. George,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-25184 Filed 10-29-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of TheCorporate Executive Board Company of our reports dated February 29, 2008, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of The Corporate Executive Board Company, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007:**Registration Statements on Form S-3:**   **Registration**  **Number** **Date Filed**333-55864 February 20, 2001333-82642 February 21, 2002333-113218 March 15, 2004**Registration Statements on Form S-8:**     **Name** **Registration Number** **Date Filed**Amended Directors’ Stock Plan 333-74145 March 9, 19991999 Stock Option Plan 333-74145 March 9, 1999Employee Stock Purchase Plan 333-39832 June 22, 20002001 Stock Option Plan 333-67238 August 10, 20012002 Non-Executive Stock Incentive Plan 333-103538 February 28, 20032004 Stock Incentive Plan 333-117774 July 30, 2004Deferred Compensation Plan 333-138685 November 14, 2006              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP  Baltimore, Maryland
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 644 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 644

           For the relief of Sergeant Phillip Anthony Gibbs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 1999

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           For the relief of Sergeant Phillip Anthony Gibbs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Sergeant 
Phillip Anthony Gibbs shall be held and considered to have been 
lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence as of 
the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa 
fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Sergeant Phillip 
Anthony Gibbs as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall 
instruct the proper officer to reduce by one number during the current 
fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of 
the country of the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 2 AND 3
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000925548
<NAME> TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          33,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     26,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,101
<PP&E>                                         187,334
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,154)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 421,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           143
<OTHER-SE>                                     189,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   421,222
<SALES>                                        125,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,117
<CGS>                                          106,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,718
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,718
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               62177
<SECURITIES>                                          1980
<RECEIVABLES>                                       544245
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    643296
<PP&E>                                              473695
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (94356)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1211620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               342880
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             23191
<OTHER-SE>                                          825778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1211620
<SALES>                                              10508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     10508
<CGS>                                                14158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      1223220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (1725)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1206992)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1206992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1206992)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.054)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.054)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 18.1


Mr. Jun Zhao, Audit Committee Chair                   12 May 2006
Mr. Gary Lui, CFO
Fantatech Inc.                                        Our ref: 66396/AP1205/0605
Suite 1801A, 18/F, Tower 1
China Hong Kong City
33 Canton Road
Tsimshatsui
Kowloon


Dear  Sirs,


FANTATECH INC.
FINANCIAL  STATEMENT  FOR  THETHREE  MONTHS  ENDED  MARCH  31,  2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------

As  stated  in  Note "Change In Method of Accounting for Inventory Valuation for
Low  Value  Items"  to the financial statements of Fantatech, Inc. for the three
months  ended  March  31, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for
low  value  inventory from the First-in, First-out ("FIFO") method to the weight
average  method  and  states  that  the  newly  adopted  accounting principle is
preferable  in  the  circumstances  because its adoption would enhance warehouse
operation  efficiency  and  resource  utilization.  Statement  of  Financial
Accounting  Standards  No.  154,  Accounting  Changes  and Error Corrections - A
Replacement  of  APB  Opinion  No.  20 and FASB Statement No. 3 ("SFAS No. 154")
demands  a  retrospective application but the Company did not do that because of
immateriality.  At  your  request,  we  have reviewed and discussed with you the
circumstances  and the business judgment and planning that formulated your basis
to  make  this  change  in  accounting  principle.

It should be understood that criteria have not been established by the Financial
Accounting  Standards  Board for selecting from among the alternative accounting
principles  that  exist  in  this  area.  Further,  the  American  Institute  of
Certified  Public  Accountants  has  not  established  the standards by which an
auditor  can  evaluate  the  preferability  of  one accounting principle among a
series  of alternatives.  However, for purposes of the Company's compliance with
the  requirements  of  the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing
this  letter.

Based  on  our  review and discussion, we concur with management's judgment that
the  newly  adopted  accounting principle described in Note "Change In Method of
Accounting  for  Inventory  Valuation  for Low Value Items" is preferable in the
circumstances.  In  formulating  this  position,  we are relying on management's
business  planning  and  judgment,  which  we  do  not  find to be unreasonable.
Because we have not audited any financial statements of Fanatech, Inc. as of any
date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2005, we express no opinion on
the  financial  statements  for  the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2006.

Very  truly  yours,
BDO  McCABE  LO  LIMITED
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 20, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR
- 2013 - 0602 FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD SUBJECT: June 20, 2014 Brief Remarks Regarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for

Existing Power Plants at the Presentation of Brownfields grant and recognition of City of Austin, Texas, energy efficiency programs

**SUMMARY** Brief remarks were made by EPA at the p resentation of Brownfields grant and recognition of City of Austin, Texas, energy efficiency programs on the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES** Austin Mayor Pro Tem Sheryl Cole EPA Participant s : Sam Coleman (Deputy Regional Administrator ) and Rob Lawrence

(Regional Policy Advisor – Energy Issues)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Form 10-Q for the six months ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements and Notes, thereto.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                    OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                              1,559,000
<SECURITIES>                                                        1,079,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      15,283,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          320,000
<INVENTORY>                                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   17,443,000
<PP&E>                                                              2,279,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        315,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     22,630,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              12,051,000
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                                5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                          9,440,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       22,630,000
<SALES>                                                            37,608,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   37,608,000
<CGS>                                                              28,788,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      34,569,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    152,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     2,948,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        1,353,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 3,039,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        1,595,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             .35


</TABLE>
#### Mathias Heiderich v. Mary Heiderich.

Chancery practice.—In a suit in chancery where the witnesses were all examined in open court and the parties were entitled, if they so desired, to have the issues tried by a jury, and the court sustained a motion to strike out all the complainant’s evidence and entered a decree dismissing the bill. *Held*that the same rule applies as In a case at law, and as the evidence tended to support the allegations of the bill, such ruling was erroneous.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. George B. Gardner, Judge, presiding.

Opinion filed January 6, 1886.

Mr. Simon P. Dotjthart, for appellant.

Mr. Arnold Tripp, for appellee.

Bailey, P. J.

This was a suit in chancery for a divorce, brought by Mathias Heiderich against Mary Heiderich, the bill charging the defendant with adultery, extreme and repeated cruelty and an attempt to take the life of the complainant by poison. The defendant answered, denying each of the several offenses charged in the bill, and charging the complainant with adultery; to which answer a general replication was filed. Afterward the cause came on to be heard before the court without a jury upon the pleadings and the witnesses examined in open court. The complainant thereupon produced and examined a large number of witnesses in support of the allegations of his bill, a,nd at the close of his evidence the defendant, without offering any evidence on her own behalf, moved •to strike out all the evidence introduced by the complainant, which motion the court sustained, and entered a decree dismissing the bill at the complainant’s costs for want of equity.

We have examined the complainant’s evidence with care and are of the opinion that it tends at least to prove each of *143the several offenses charged in the bill. As to the charge of extreme and repeated cruelty the proof seems to be very strong and convincing. But in view of the manner in which the decree was arrived at we think it unnecessary for us to consider its weight or conclusiveness.

It is well settled in suits at law that a motion to strike out all the plaintiff’s evidence is in the nature of a demurrer to. the evidence, and like such demurrer admits not only all the facts proved but also every conclusion which the jury might fairly and reasonably have drawn therefrom. Phillips v. Dickerson, 85 Ill. 10; Font et al. v. T. P. *&*W. Ry. Co., 59 Id. 349 ; Poleman v. Johnson, 84 Id. 269; Lawrence v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of *N.*Y., 5 Bradwell, 280; Pratt v. Stone, 10 Id. 633.

We "see no reason why the same rule should not apply to a suit in chancery, especially like this, where the witnesses are all examined in open court, and where the parties are enabled, if they so desire, to have the issues tried by a jury. The court below, by striking out the evidence, held, in effect, that it did not tend to support the allegations of the bill. Such ruling, in our opinion, was erroneous, and for that reason the decree will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Decree reversed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6276

ANTONIO EUGENE GAYNOR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNNAMED DEFENDANT, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-04-668) Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: 

### May 26, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Eugene Gaynor, Appellant Pro Se. Denise Colette Anderson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

### - 2 - PER CURIAM: Antonio Eugene Gaynor, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition without prejudice based on his failure to exhaust state remedies. This order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1); see Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 368-69, 374 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s asses sment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural findings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gaynor has not made the requisite showing. Acc ordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED