alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-83285) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our report dated January 27, 2000, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Inet Technologies, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                  Dallas, Texas

March 1, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Removal of Designated Chinese Military Companies

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and 
Sustainment), Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of removal of a company from the 2023 Section 1260H List 
of Chinese Military Companies Operating in the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Deputy Secretary of Defense has decided to delist the 
entity listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice 
from the list of ``Chinese military companies'' in accordance with the 
William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2021, without prejudice to relisting the company on 
additional or supplementary grounds.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Devante Brown (GIES), (703) 695-
8545.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1260H of the William M. (Mac) 
Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 
(Pub. L. 116-283) requires the Secretary of Defense to list ``Chinese 
military companies'' that meet the statutory criteria annually until 
December 31, 2030. Paragraph (b)(2) of this section requires the 
Secretary of Defense to publish the unclassified portion of such list 
in the Federal Register.
    The Deputy Secretary of Defense has decided to delist the following 
entity from the list of ``Chinese military companies'' in accordance 
with section 1260H, without prejudice to relisting the entity on 
additional or supplementary grounds:

Hesai Technology Co., Ltd. (Hesai)

    Dated: October 24, 2024.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-25168 Filed 10-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert L. Wagman,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of LKQ Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

March 18, 2014



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ ROBERT L. WAGMAN                 
|Robert L. Wagman                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
#### JAMES A. CLAYWELL, Administrator, v. W. S. SUDDERTH, Executor.

*Jurisdiction*— Praetiee.

Where an action was pending in one County in a Court having jurisdiction, and another action between the same parties for the same cause of action was afterwards instituted in another County ; *Held,*that the latter was properly dismissed.

Appeal from an Order of the Clerk of Burke Superior Court, .heard at Chambers on the 1st day of June, 1877, before *Furches, J.*

The defendant’s counsel moved to dismiss this action upon the ground that there was a similar proceeding pending'^in Caldwell Superior Court, between the same parties, involving the same subject matter, and in which various orders of reference, reports, and decrees have been made. This motion was overruled by the Clerk, and the defendant required to render 'an account, &c. Thereupon the defendant appealed *288to the Judge of the District who reversed the decision of the Clerk, allowed the motion of the defendant and dismissed the action. Erom which judgment the plaintiff appealed.

*Messrs. J. M. Me Corkle*and *A. W.*Maywood, for plaintiff.

*Mr. A. G.*Avery, for defendant.

Reads, J.

The pendency of the action between the same parties for the same cause in another County, and in another Court having jurisdiction, is a good defence to this action, as it avoids multiplicity of suits.

There is no error. This will be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert
Mathews, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Viking Systems, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended
December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Viking Systems, Inc.






Date:
      March 31, 2008
            /s/ Robert MathewsRobert
      MathewsChief
      Financial Officer
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                J. Michael Wilson                |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
| J.                Michael Wilson                    |
| Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer |
| March                23, 2007                       |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,932
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,150
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,866,442<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,932
<SALES>                                        229,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,248
<CGS>                                          262,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,246,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,005,758)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,005,758)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,005,758)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Represents Total Partners' Capital
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
<CIK>0001065310
<NAME>RH DONNELLEY CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              60
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,979
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               179,639
<PP&E>                                          58,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 497,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,745
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,774
<OTHER-SE>                                     327,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   497,683
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               268,937
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                17,828
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                138,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                    60,513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,645
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,645
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.28


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00752

- CV

Kendrick Tyrone Hester, Appellant

v.

Josephine Patricia Guy, Appellee

FROM THE 426TH DISTR ICT COURT OF BELL CO UNTY

NO. 305,693

- E, THE H ONORABLE FANCY H. JE ZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant ’s brief was originally due on January 13, 2020

. On March 3, 2020 , this

C ourt sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to file

a satis f actory response by March 13, 2020

, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want

of p rosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 31, 2020
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended July 6, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report’), I, J. Steven Roy, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

###### **(1)**                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

###### **(2)**                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  J. Steven Roy |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| J. Steven Roy           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 20, 2003         |

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
#### THOMAS W. SPARROW v. THE TRUSTEES OF DAVIDSON COLLEGE.

*Serviee of Summons*— Notice—Appeal,

1. Service of a summons is notice of an action and the defendant is bound! to take notice of the judgment therein if one be taken against him.

3. Where a defendant appealed from the judgment of a Justice of the Peace upon the ground that the only notice he had of the action was the service of the summons ; *Held,*That the appeal was properly dismissed.

3. The word “or” in Bat. Rev. oh. 63, § 54, should be read “and.” '

*{McDaniel*v. Watkins, 76 N. C., 399, cited and approved.)

Motion to dismiss an Appeal from a Justice’s Court, heard. *36at Spring Term, 1877, of Mecklenburg Superior Court, before *Cloud, J.*

In 1876, the plaintiff brought an action against the defendant before a Justice of the Peace. The summons was returned “executed,” and judgment rendered .in favor of plaintiff. No execution was issued upon the judgment. The defendant failed to appeal foi a considerable time after the ten days which elapsed after the rendition of judgment. The defendant did not appear at the trial, and had no notice of the judgment except in so far as the service of the summons may be treated as notice. The defendant craved an appeal within fifteen days after receiving notice, and in less than ten days thereafter, gave the proper notice of appeal, and an undertaking. The motion of the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal was allowed by His Honor and the defendant appealed

*Messrs. Shipp cf Bailey,*for plaintiff.

*Mr. A. Bunoell,*for defendant.

Rodman, J.

The word “or” in ch. 63-, § 54, of Bat. Rev, evidently should be read “and.” It is probably a mere misprint. If a defendant be personally served with a Justice’s warrant he has notice of the action and is bound to take notice of the judgment if one be taken against him. *McDaniel*v. *Watkins,*76 N. C. 399, is therefore in point.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
. '**~;** : i;'

.

June 19, 2013 REVISED 2 

# Security Aviation Tatitlek EAS Proposal

Response to re-solicitation Proposal to Provide EAS at Tatitlek, Docket DOT-OST-2013-0030 Mr. Kevin Adams Contracting Officer Kevin.adams@dot.gov Phone 202-366-1047

Submitted By: Fly 4 You, Inc dba Security Aviation 6121 South AirparkPlace Anchorage, Alaska 99502 RE: EAS between Anchorage and Tatitlek, AK SolicitationNumber: DocketDOT-OST-2013-0030 OfferReceipt Deadline: Thursday March 21, 2013 DearMr. Adams: Please accept this proposal for the above-referenced solicitation for providing Essential Air Service between Anchorage and Tatitlek, Alaska. Security Aviation is an Alaskan owned and Anchorage based small business operating out ofa private facility onthe Ted Stevens International Airport We offer free parking, a comfortable lobby and refer/freezer space is available at no charge. We have been conducting safe and efficient operations in Alaskafor 27 years which affords us the ability to carry $30 million of liability coverage withno seat limits. Our aircraft and pilots have a proven history of successful operations throughout Alaska. This proposal is based onthe utilization ofa twin-engine PiperNavajo. Security Aviation operates two (2) Navajos. Route: Anchorage- Tatitlek- Anchorage (direct Inon-stop flights) Proposedtravel days: Monday and Thursday (proposed days may change based on customer and village feedback) Departure time: 10:00 AM* Frequency oft1ights: 2 (two) dedicated flights per week* f (1 i.t' j uThe PiperNavajo o±Iers a max payload of: 1,700 lbs Anchorage to Tatitlek And 1,850 lbs Tatitlekto Anchorage Passengers: up to 8 (eight) Flighttime is 45 min each way Estimated cost: $1,917.00 pertrip Seat Fares: $170.00 each way (50 lbs ofcargo allowable per person at no charge) Additional .50 cents per pound in excess of50 lbs Personal/Cargo only: $20.00 handling fee+ (plus) .50 cents per pound (limitedto space available) Mail pick-up and drop-offat Tatitlek airportto be arranged /paid for by DoTNillage of Tatitlek Mail pick-up and drop-offat Anchorage, Postmark Drive location to be handled by Security Aviation. Proposal, seatfares and cargo are based on flight time and cost offuel. All pricing includes landing fees and Federal Excise Tax. This proposal is valid for this solicitation only and may be changed ifsolicitation is amended or ifthe award is delayed beyond areasonable period oftime. Contract Performance Security Aviation has beenthe primary contractor for transportation ofpersonnel services to the DOD in Alaskafor the last 15 years. Overthat time we have established and maintained a cohesive working relationship with the DOD, DOT, DOl, State ofAlaska, FAA and a number ofother safety-sensitive companies. We look forward to the opportunityto expandupon and continue this long-term, mutually beneficial relationship.

Person authorized to negotiate contract:

Person authorized to sign proposal: Mr. Jason Ward Sr. Vice President Sales and Marketing Security Aviation Tel. No.: (907) 248-2677 Fax No.: (907 248-6911 Mr. Jason Ward Same as above
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's financial statements as of and for the period ended January 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                        714,275 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                               7,084,081 
<ALLOWANCES>                                  488,000 
<INVENTORY>                                   561,908 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            8,432,548       
<PP&E>                                      8,578,271      
<DEPRECIATION>                              4,385,690    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             15,478,437      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,814,974    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<COMMON>                                    1,966,463 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                  5,031,409       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               15,478,437         
<SALES>                                    10,999,020          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           22,051,407          
<CGS>                                       1,966,534          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               6,853,442          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           10,450,491       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               47,410      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             49,975       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               941,994       
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           941,994      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  941,994 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .24 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .24 
        
                                  


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Jeffery Stegenga, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June30, 2007 of Tower Automotive, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design and oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 6, 2007/s/ Jeffery Stegenga
#### Koopmann, Respondent, vs. Koopmann, Appellant.

*664For the appellant: *Schanen & Schanen*of Port Washington, and *N. A. Pachefsky*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *Wm. P. Schanen, Sr.,*of Port Washington and *N. A. Pachefsky*of Milwaukee of counsel.

For the respondent: *Bonner & Houseman*of Grafton, attorneys, and *Charles J. Kunny*of Port Washington of counsel.

*By the Court.*

The order and judgment appealed from are affirmed.