alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-04-1998             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         570,872                 568,612
<SECURITIES>                                   531,718                 681,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,250                   8,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,108,840               1,258,525
<PP&E>                                         184,644                 192,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,405                   6,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,423,741               1,580,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          190,130                 205,286
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        20,208                  20,133
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,196,379               1,328,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,423,741               1,580,186
<SALES>                                          6,250                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,250                       0
<CGS>                                              851                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  444,602                  10,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,236                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (431,685)                (10,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (431,685)                (10,606)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (431,685)                (10,606)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)                  (0.02)
        
 

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.19



ADDENDUM TO THE

CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

USA OFFSHORE MANAGEMENT, LTD. (USAOM)

AND

AMERINST INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. (THE COMPANY)

EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2002



Management Agreement Addendum



| | 1) | It is hereby agreed that, for the period January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2004, the Company will compensate manager at a rate of $160,000 per annum.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2) | Cause the above fee to be paid in quarterly installments in advance at the beginning of each calendar quarter.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3) | Reimburse USAOM for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred during the management of the COMPANY including; courier and express mail service; long distance telephone calls;
travel and meeting expenses incurred at the request of the COMPANY; costs of COMPANY stationery; filing fees; and similar expenses.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



COMPANY agrees that special projects will be invoiced separately at agreed upon fees or rates.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Addendum this 1stday of January, 2002.



By:

/s/Andrew SargeantUSA Risk Group (Bermuda), Ltd.By:

/s/ Ronald S. KatchAmerInst Insurance Company, Ltd.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,102,325
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  299,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                    89,801
<INVENTORY>                                    106,522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,450,725
<PP&E>                                       2,761,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                 463,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,950,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          883,732
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,149
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,049,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,950,744
<SALES>                                          1,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,757
<CGS>                                              845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,344,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,210,699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,210,699)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,210,699)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  285,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     79,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               450,000
<PP&E>                                         798,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (82,958)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,828,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          287,999
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           231
<OTHER-SE>                                     535,227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,828,314
<SALES>                                        457,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               457,129
<CGS>                                          393,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  393,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        

</TABLE>
#### *CATHARINE G. SHELTON v. SARAH L. SHELTON.

*Appeal*— New *Trial where Judge retires from office.*

Where a judge goes out of office before preparing a case on appeal, a new trial will be awarded unless the parties agree upon a statement of the case. The *certiorari*applied for is granted to afford the parties an opportunity to adjust their differences in the premises.

PETITION for *certiorari*heard at October Term, 1883, of The SupreME Court.

*Mr. Armistead Jones,*for plaintiff.

No counsel for defendant.

*

Mr. Justice MERitniox, having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing of this case.

SMITH, C. J.

The facts disclosed in the affidavit of the plaintiff’s counsel, to which no opposing evidence is offered, are, that 'separate statements of the case on appeal, prepared for the respective parties, were delivered to the judge who tried the cause, for his adjustment of the differences between them. He transmitted to the clerk a statement of his own, omitting one or more of appellant’s exceptions to the rulings which were intended to be brought up for review, without giving notice to the parties or affording them an opportunity of being heard before his final action. The retirement of the judge from office prevents the perfecting the appeal in the mode prescribed by the statute, and would, in the absence of any case, render unavoidable the award of a new trial. This necessity may be avoided by the appellee’s assent to the filing of the appellant’s case, as part of the record and the appeal then heard upon it. We therefore grant the application for the writ of *certiorari,*to the end that an opportunity may be offered to the, parties to file the appellant’s case, without addition or change, to come with the record in *186response to the requirements of the writ, and this can only be with the assent of the appellee.

Let the writ issue as prayed for on the terms preseribed'by law.

Per Curiam. *Certiorari*ordered.
#### Schmidt, Respondent, vs. The Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Company, Appellant.

*January 8*

March *11, 1941.*

*223The cause was submitted for the appellant on the'brief of *Shaw, Muskat & Paulsen,*attorneys, and *F. H. Prosser*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and for the respondent on that of *Gerald H. Kops*and *Rubin, Zabel & Ruppa,*attorneys, and *Wm. B. Rubin*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

Fowler, J.

As appears from the foregoing statement, the plaintiff recovered on the finding of the jury that the motorman was negligent as to lookout, management and control, and entering on the red light while the plaintiff was only negligent as to lookout. We consider that the findings of the jury that the motorman entered the intersection on the red light, and that the plaintiff was not negligent as to right of way are contrary to the undisputed physical facts. The automobile was traveling approximately three times as fast as the streetcar. The lights changed simultaneously. If the light went red against the streetcar before it entered the intersection the streetcar must have traveled farther than the plaintiff did after the light changed and before the collision occurred, which is physically impossible with the automobile traveling three times as fast as the'Streetcar. It is therefore plain that the light was green for the streetcar when it entered the intersection and the streetcar therefore had the right of way over the automobile. *Watermolen v. Fox River Electric Railway & Power Co.*110 Wis. 153, 85 N. W. 663; *Goldmann v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co.*123 Wis. 168, 101 N. W. 384.

We are also of the view that if the motorman was negligent as to management and control, the plaintiff was equally negligent in that respect. Both entered on the green light, but if one was negligent in the respect mentioned, so was the other. If the motorman was under obligation to so manage and control his vehicle as to avoid collision with an automobile that might be passing behind the train, so was the plaintiff under equal obligation to so manage and control *224his automobile as to avoid colliding with a streetcar that might be passing behind it. The plaintiff’s negligence in this respect, if any there was on the part of either, would plainly seem to be the greater, as the streetcar had the right of way over the automobile. It cannot be said the motorman’s negligence as to lookout was any greater than plaintiff’s in that respect. The plaintiff’s negligence in this respect would seem to be greater than the motorman’s as the plaintiff could see the trolley of the streetcar over the top oí the train while the motorman could not see the automobile through it.

For the reasons stated the judgment must be reversed and the complaint dismissed.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is reversed with directions to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

Fritz and Martin, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.1


                  Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officers of Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") certify pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

a.   the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
     March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.   the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



                                   /s/ Clark M. Mower
Date:   May 9, 2005                ____________________________________
                                   Clark M. Mower
                                   Chief Executive Officer


                                   /s/ John A. Sindt
Date:   May 9, 2005                ____________________________________
                                   John A. Sindt
                                   Principal Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 I, John P. Mitola, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Electric City Corp. (the
Corporation).2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    The Corporations other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Corporation and have:  a.
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Corporation, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporations disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Corporations most
recent fiscal quarter (the Corporations fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting;
and  5.
    The Corporations other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Corporations auditors and the audit committee of the Corporations board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a.
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Corporations ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Corporations internal control
over financial reporting. 
 Date: April 13, 2005 
 /s/ John P. MitolaJohn P. MitolaChief Executive Officer
 47
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report of Scantek Medical Inc (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Zsigmond L. Sagi, President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the period
presented.

Dated: May 20, 2003

                                           By: /s/ Zsigmond L. Sagi
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                 Zsigmond L. Sagi, President
                                                    and Chief Financial Officer


This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Scantek Medical, Inc. and will be retained
by Scantek Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
----

| 1 | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2 | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods explained in the    report. |
|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Adrian Sarbu                      |   |                               | /s/      Charles Frank |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|   |                                       |   |                               |
|   | Adrian      Sarbu                          |   | Charles      Frank                 |
|   |                                       |   |                               |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   | Chief      Financial Officer       |
|   |                                       |   |                               |
|   | (Principal      Executive Officer)         |   | (Principal      Financial Officer) |
|   |                                       |   |                               |
|   | October      27, 2009                      |   | October      27, 2009              |

----
**EXHIBIT 10.11**

 

**DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS**

**BETWEEN REGISTRANT AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS**

 

Members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of Concur receive compensation for their services as directors as provided below. 

 

Each outside director who joined the Board prior to June 2003 was granted an option for 50,000 shares under the 1998Directors Stock Option Plan on the date he first became a member of the Board of Directors and, if he has served as a director continuously since the date of his original option grant, he is granted an option for 20,000 shares under the 1998Directors Stock Option Plan on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. 

 

Each outside director who joined the Board after June 2003 may select one of the following two options. Under the first option, the outside director receives a cash stipend of approximately $35,000 per year, isgranted an option for 40,000 shares under the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan on the date he first becomes a member of the Board of Directors, and, if he has served as a director continuously since the date of his original option grant, he isgranted an option for 10,000 shares under the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. Under the second option, the outside director is granted an option for 60,000 shares under the 1998 Directors StockOption Plan on the date he first becomes a member of the Board of Directors and, if he has served as a director continuously since the date of his original option grant, he is granted an option for 20,000 shares under the 1998 Directors Stock OptionPlan on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. 

 

Alldirectors are reimbursed for their reasonable travel expenses in attending Board and committee meetings.