May 22

, 2015

Exemption No. 11674 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0655

Josef S. Keeney Managing Member 4Rotor Filming LLC

P.O. Box 414 Ellsworth, Maine 04605

Dear Mr. Keeney :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

By letter dated March 12, 2015 , you p etitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of 4Rotor Filming LLC ( hereinafter petitioner or operator ) for an exemption. The petitioner requested to operate an unmanned ai rcraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial videography and cinematography

.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption

.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the Turbo Ace MATRIX

- I , DJI Phantom 2, and DJI Spreading Wings S900

.

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates

. In accordance with the statutory criteria2

provided in Section 333 of P ublic Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U

. S

. C

. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft

meets the co nditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from

14 CFR part 21

, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection

. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition.

In Grants of Exe mption No s

. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Lab s , Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater propo rtions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 ;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and

11213 also apply to the situation you pre sent; and

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, 4Rotor Filming LLC is granted an exemption from

14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection

. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, 4Rot or Filming LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator.3

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the Turbo Ace

MATRIX

- I, DJI Phantom 2, and DJI Spreading Wings S900 when weighing less than

55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption

.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming are (not) permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision un aided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate or
U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times ;

e lectronic messaging or texting is not permitted d uring flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating

documents must be accessible during UAS operati ons and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and mu st be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and rev ised4

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any upda te or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FA A’s UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g.

, replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight prior to conducti ng further operations under this exemption. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such a manner so as to not pose an undue haz ard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre

- flight inspection and determine the

UAS is in a condi tion for safe flight. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g.

, inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited f

rom operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Col u mbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC must also meet the fligh t revi ew requirements specified in

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consis tent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a ma nner consistent with5

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS w ill be operated under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During

traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not es sential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as

denoted in the curr ent FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbo l as denoted on the current

FAA

- published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or otherw ise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or les s than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS sign al, the UA must return to a

pre

- determined location within the pr ivate or controlled

- access prop erty.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the

in tended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All operations shall be cond ucted in accordance with an ATO

- issued COA. The exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA

.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be i dentified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N− Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.6

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating.

These documents must be made available to the Adminis trator or any law enforcement official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and

activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations m ust be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. Th e operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety of nonparticipating persons ; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects a nd determined that it does not present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or control led

- access property wit h permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transg resses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported

to the FA A's UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion pict ure and television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) as documented in this grant of exemption.7

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the a rea of proposed filming. The 3

- day notification may be waived with the c oncurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of th e per son responsible for the on

- scene operation of the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, includin g maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR includ ing, but not limited to,
parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures

## Josef Keeney

Managing Member 

## 4 Rotor Filming LLC 

### (207)-460-7933 joe@4rotorfilming.com



### 4 **Rotor Filming llc - Section 333 Exemption Petition** 

**March 12, 2015**



### U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

**Re:** Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations from
14 C.F.R. 21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.7 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.103(b); 14
C.F.R. § 91.109; 14 C.F.R. § 91.119; 14 C.F.R. § 91.121; 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.203(a) and (b); 14
C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.407 (a)(1); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a ) (2); and, 14 C.F.R.
§§ 91.417 (a) & (b)

Dear Sir or Madam,

I, Joe Keeney, managing member, independently, and PIC of **4 Rotor Filming**  am writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that 4Rotor Filming owner and operator of small unmanned aircrafts, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) listed below so that 4Rotor Filming may operate the unmanned aircraft system (“UAS”) commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”).

4Rotor Filming has several UAS’s. Attached are the Operators Manual for the three UAS’s. The UAS’s are equipped with High Definition cameras for aerial videography/cinematography to enhance academic community awareness for those individuals and companies unfamiliar with the geographical layout of our area and augment real estate listing videos; following exemption and approval by the FAA. Thereby enhancing their academic research and experience of the state of Maine and its coastal shoreline

.

I, Joe Keeney, am a current CFII/MEI since 2000 and have been flying small RC electric helicopters/ airplanes since 1995 without incident. My experience with flying realtors around a piece of property in a fixed wing aircraft has not always been successful due to shooting through windows, struts and wheels not to mention the green faces. The cost, safety and success rate has greatly improved with the use of these incredible UAS’s. 4Rotor Filming’s exemption request would permit the operation of unmanned (piloted by remote control) UAS’s in tightly controlled and limited airspace, committed to safety first with each flight. Predetermined in areas away from general public, airports, heliports restricted airspace, TFR’s, VFR corridors and vehicular traffic for community videos, and within property boundaries for individual homeowner real estate listing videos/photos. Currently, similar lightweight, remote controlledUAS's are legally operated by unmonitored amateur hobbyists with no safety plan or controls in place to

prevent catastrophe. 4Rotor Filming has instilled safety protocols and controls to avoid and prevent public hazard, as well as manned aircraft hazards/catastrophe. This will act to further safety protocols exclusive to lightweight UAS's specific to real estate video and photography usage as 4Rotor Filming

records flight data and other information gained through permitted flight operations to share with the FAA through any required FAA reports to assist with future protocol and safety regulation.

Granting 4Rotor Filming’s, request comports with the Secretary of Transportation’s (FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities and authority to not only integrate UAS's into the national airspace system, but to “...establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems [UAS's] in the national airspace system” under Section 333(c) of the Reform Act specific to the use of UAS's for real estate/Realtor purposes. Further 4Rotor Filming, will conduct our operations in compliance with the protocols described herein or as otherwise established by the FAA.

For the reasons stated below 4Rotor Filming, respectfully requests the grant of an exemption allowing 4Rotor Filming to operate UAS’s for academic community awareness to benefit/stimulate attraction to

Maine’s coastal area and to enhance real estate listing videos for homeowners who cannot afford expensive manned aircraft for the same purpose. Both of which will promote local economic growth through increased employment and increased tax base. Both with public safety in mind by keeping heavier manned aircraft containing combustible fuel that poses potential public hazard.

**I. Contact Information:** Josef S. Keeney 36 Elm St Ellsworth Maine, 04605 P.O. Box 414 Ellsworth Maine, 04605 Mobile: (207) 460-7933

**II**

. **The Specific Sections of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations From Which 4Rotor Filming Requests Exemption are:** 
14 CFR 21; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. 91, et seq.; 14 CFR 407 (a) (1); 14 CFR 409 (a) (2); and, 14 CFR 417 (a) & (b).

**III. The Extent of relief 4Rotor Filming seeks and the Reason for Such Relief:**

4Rotor Filming submits this application in accordance with the Reform Act, 112 P.L. 95 §§ 331-334, seeking relief from any currently applicable FARs operating to prevent 4Rotor Filming, contemplated commercial cinematic, academic and other flight operations within the national airspace system. The Reform Act in Section 332 provides for such integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into our national airspace system as it is in the public’s interest to do so. 4Rotor Filming’s, UAS’s meets the definition of “small unmanned aircraft” as defined in Section 331 and therefore the integration of my UAS’s are expressly contemplated by the Reform Act. 4Rotor Filming would like to operate our UAS’s prior to the time period by which the Reform Act requires the FAA to promulgate rules governing such craft. Thereby, providing direct experience and valuable information for formal regulation that can be administered uniformly to all real estate related UAS aerial video and photography. The Reform Act guides the Secretary in determining the types of UAS's that may operate safely in our national airspacesystem. Considerations include: The weight, size, speed and overall capabilities of the UAS's; Whether the UAS will be operated near airports or heavily populated areas; and, Whether the UAS will be operated by line of sight. 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (a). Each of these items reflect in favor of an exemption for 4Rotor Filming. The UAS’s are equipped with GPS and auto return safety technology. All UAS’s weighing less than 20 pounds (far below the maximum 55 pound limit); including camera with gimbal. 4Rotor Filming, considers safety as foremost with each flight. 4Rotor Filming’s UAS’s are designed to hover in place via GPS and operate in less than a 24 knot (15 mph) wind. For safety, stability and fear of financial loss I will not fly in winds exceeding 16 kph (10 mph). Built in safety systems include a GPS mode that allows the UAS’s to hover in place when radio controls are released. With three modes to choose from, I utilize the Safe Mode for aerial videography/photography. This is the safest, most reliable and stable mode to prevent accident and hazard. When pilot communication is lost the UAS’s are designed to return to the original departure point with a GPS controlled descent of 1m/s. 4Rotor Filming will not operate the UAS’s near airports, Hospitals or Police heliports, and do not operate near areas where general public is within fifty to one hundred (50-100) yards depending on location, conditions and weather. We are constantly on alert for any manned aircraft (Police/Medical helicopters, etc.) and are prepared to land/abort immediately to the nearest and safest ground point should a manned aircraft approach my location or I suspect manned aircraft may approach near my location. The UAS’s are capable of vertical and horizontal operations, and are flown only within line of sight of the PIC or a Visual Observer. Utilizing battery power rather than combustible fuels, flights generally last between 15 to 18 minutes, with an altitude under 400 feet. 4Rotor Filming does not operate the UAS’s at or below manufacture recommend minimum charge levels for operation; preferring to remain well within a safe operating range to insure adequate communication between radio control and UAS to eliminate potential failure, hazards and loss of control. Reserve batteries are on hand with each flight to insure a safe level of operation. 4Rotor Filming will be taking no risks that may cause a crash, creating a hazardous situation to the public/property/manned aircraft, and have no desire to lose any investments. 4Rotor Filming’s PIC has over 100 hours on each type of UAS that is in operation. 4Rotor Filming is extremely cautious when operating the UAS’s and will not “create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public.” 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (b). Given the small size and weight of the UAS’s fall well within Congress’s contemplated safety zone when it promulgated the Reform Act and the corresponding directive to integrate UAS's into the national airspace system. 4Rotor Filming has a demonstrable safety record and does not pose any threat to the general public or national security.

**IV. How 4Rotor Filming’s Request Will Benefit the Public As A Whole:**

Aerial videography for geographical awareness and for real estate marketing has been around for a long time through manned fixed wing aircraft and helicopters. For small budget real estate companies and average homeowners the expense of such aerial videography is cost prohibitive. Only large companies and high end Realtors or luxury homeowners can afford to absorb such expense. Depriving non-luxury homeowners and lower budget Realtors from a valuable marketing tool. Manned aircraft pose a threat to the public through potential catastrophic failure. UAS’s pose no such threat since the size and lack of

combustible fuel reduces any potential threat to the public. Congress has already proclaimed that it is in the public’s interest to integrate commercially flown UAS's into the national airspace system, hence the passing of the Reform Act. Granting 4Rotor Filming’s, exemption request furthers the public interest through academic/visual awareness. UAS’s are battery powered and creates no emissions that can harm the environment. The consequence of a UAS crashing is far less than a full size helicopter or fixed wing aircraft; which are heavy, contain combustible fuel and can cause catastrophic devastation to the public.The public’s interest is furthered by minimizing ecological and crash threat by permitting aerial video/ photo capture through battery operated UAS's. Permitting 4Rotor Filming to immediately fly within national air space furthers economic growth. Granting my exemption request substantially furthers the economic impact for Maine communities for companies and families looking to relocate, build or career advancement through academic and geographical awareness. Both of which serve as a stimulus to the community.

**V. Reasons Why 4Rotor Filming’s Exemption Will Not Adversely Affect Safety Or How The Exemption Will Provide a Level of Safety At Least Equal To Existing Rule:** 

4Rotor Filming’s exemption will not adversely affect safety. Quite the contrary, for the reasons stated permitting 4Rotor Filming to log more flight time in FAA controlled airspace, with communication with the FAA, will allow me to contribute to the innovation and implementation of new and novel, as of yet undiscovered safety protocols for government agencies (from inspections to search and rescue), forestry and agricultural management, the list is quite long, for development in cooperation with the FAA. In addition, 4Rotor Filming submits the following representations of enhancements to current aerial videography and photography for real estate:



### • The UAS’s weigh less than 20 pounds with High Definition cameras;



### • The UAS’s operate well below the 400 foot permissible ceiling set by the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012);



### • Flight duration for 14 to 18 minutes per flight;



### • The UAS’s alert the PIC prior to manufacturer recommended minimum battery power to ensure the safety of the equipment and surroundings. The UAS’s automatically return to their original departure point(Home Point) by ascending(currently set for 125feet) to a safe altitude when it detects low voltage, constantly aware of the voltage needed to return to the Home Point and will depart from any task to do so;



### • The UAS’s are operated through remote control and by line of sight only;



### • The UAS’s have a GPS flight safety feature whereby it ascends to a safe altitude and returns to its Home Point if communications are lost with the PIC;

• The PIC is constantly analyzing flight data sent from the UAS enhancing safety protocols;

• Altitude

• Vertical/Horizontal speed

• Distance from Home Point

• Battery voltage

• GPS satellite coverage

• Camera input



### • The UAS’s are only operated in reasonably safe environments that are strictly controlled, are away from power lines, elevated lights, airports and actively populated areas;



### • 4Rotor Filming conducts extensive pre-flight inspections and protocol ensuring safety.



### • 4Rotor Filming always obtains all necessary permissions prior to operation

.



### • 4Rotor Filming has procedures in place to abort flights in the event of safety breaches or potential dangers. 4Rotor Filming’s safety protocols provide a level of safety equal to or exceeding existing rules. It is important to note that absent the integration of commercial UAS into our national airspace system, helicopters and fixed wing aircrafts are the primary means of aerial video and photography for community awareness and real estate. While the safety records are remarkably astounding, there has been incidents involving loss of life as well as extensive property damage; it is far safer to operate a battery powered

UAS.

### • First, the potential loss of life is diminished because UAS's carry no humans on board and only operated in specific areas away from mass populations.



### • Second, there is no fuel on board a UAS decreasing the potential of fire or explosions

.



### • Third, due to the size and extreme maneuverability of the UAS’s provide the ability to avoid hazards quickly and safely.

**VI. A Summary The FAA May Publish in the Federal Register:**

A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and The Like.

14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1). The size, weight and enclosed operational area of 4Rotor Filming’s UAS permits exemption from Part 21 because the UAS’s meet (and exceeds) an equivalent level of safety pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft from the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration of the weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and dense populations. 4Rotor Filming’s UAS's meet or exceed each of the elements.

14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable.

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no on board pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS's, this Regulation is inapplicable. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a

14 C.F.R. § 91.121 regarding altimeter settings is inapplicable since UAS’s utilize electronic global positioning systems with a barometric sensor.

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b) provides for the carrying of civil aircraft certifications and registrations. They are inapplicable for the same reasons described above. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining any such required certifications and registrations by 4Rotor Filming.

B. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23: Marking of The Aircraft.

Applicable Codes of Federal Regulation require aircraft to be marked according to certain specifications. My UAS are, by definition, unmanned. They therefore do not have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to mark certain words or phrases. Further, two-inch lettering is difficult to place on such small aircraft with dimensions smaller that minimal lettering requirement. Regardless, I will mark its UASs in the largest possible lettering by placing the word “EXPERIMENTAL” on its fuselage as required by 14 C.F.R. §45.29 (f) so that I the pilot, or anyone assisting me as a spotter with the UAV will see the markings. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation through Exemptions Nos. 8738, 10167, 10167A and 10700.C. 14 C.F.R. 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes.

14 C.F.R. § 91.119 prescribes safe altitudes for the operation of civil aircraft. It allows helicopters to be operated at lower altitudes in certain conditions. My UAS will never operate at an altitude greater than 200 AGL; safely below the standard of 400 AGL. I, Douglas Trudeau, will however operate my UAS in safe areas away from public and traffic, providing a level of safety at least equivalent to or below those in relation to minimum safe altitudes. Given the size, weight, maneuverability and speed of my UAS, an equivalent or higher level of safety will be achieved.

E. 14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections.

The above-cited Regulations require, amongst other things, aircraft owners and operators to “have [the] aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter. . . .”

These Regulations only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. They will not, therefore, apply to 4Rotor Filming's UAS. However, as a safety precaution 4Rotor Filming inspects each UAS before and after each flight.

A Summary The FAA May Publish in the Federal Register: A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and The Like. 14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1). The size, weight and enclosed operational area of my UAS permits exemption from Part 21 because my, Douglas Trudeau’s, UAS meets an equivalent level of safety pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft from the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration of the weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and dense populations. My UAS meets or exceeds each of the elements. 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS's, this Regulation is inapplicable. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a manual. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, maintenance program that involves regular software updates and curative measures for any damaged hardware. Therefore, an equivalent level of safety will be achieved.**In summary, 4Rotor Filming seeks an exemption from the following Regulations:**

14 C.F.R. 21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.7 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.103(b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.109; 14 C.F.R. § 91.119; 14 C.F.R. § 91.121; 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.203(a) and (b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.407 (a)(1); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a ) (2); and, 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.417 (a) & (b) to commercially operate 4Rotor Filming's UAS’s in community awareness and real estate operations, and to develop economic platforms for real estate to enhance the experience of those seeking to relocate or simply wanting to buy a new home. Currently, area awareness and real estate aerial videography/photography relies primarily on the use of larger aircraft running on combustible fuel. Posing potential risk to the public. Granting 4Rotor Filming’s request for exemption will reduce current risk levels and thereby enhance safety. The UAS’s do not contain explosive fuel, is smaller, lighter and more maneuverable than conventional aircraft with much less flight time. Further, the UAS’s are operated at a much lower altitude and in controlled airspace eliminating potential public risk flying to and from established air fields. 4Rotor Filming is more then willing to work with the FAA to enhance the FAA's internal efforts to establish protocols for complying with the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. There are no personnel on board 4Rotors Filming’s UAS’s and therefore the likelihood of death or serious bodily injury is significantly diminished. 4Rotor Filming’s operation of the UAS’s, weighing less than 20 pounds and traveling at lower speeds within limited areas will provide an equivalent level of safety as that achieved under current FARs. Accordingly, 4Rotor Filming respectfully request that the FAA grant 4Rotor Filming the exemption request and is willing to cooperate in sharing information to benefit the FAA, safety of manned aircraft, and the general public at large.

Respectfully submitted,

Josef S. Keeney Managing Member

**4** Rotor Filming LLC 36 Elm St. Ellsworth, Maine 04605 P.O. Box 414 Ellsworth, Maine 04605 Mobile (207) 460-7933

### Protocols and Controls

Safety for public on the ground as well as manned aircraft above is an essential and utmost consideration for aerial videos and photography. As such, safety protocols and controls must be implemented through pre-flight preparation and during flight.



### Pre-Flight Protocol:

• Check batteries with voltage meter to insure fully charged and ready for use.

• Inspect batteries for damage or leakage that may affect proper operation.

• Inspect propellers for cracks, chips or damage that may cause sudden loss of propulsion or unmanageable/

uncontrolled flight.

• Check weather forecasts for wind advisory or other conditions that my impact flight.

• Consult five (5) mile radius map for airport vicinity.

o Contact respective airport to advise of estimated flight time, estimated flight duration, estimated
elevation of flight, and any other pertinent information.

• Inspect flight area for vicinity of public safety helipads/heliports

o vicinity of medical helipads/heliports

o vicinity of light poles

o vicinity or utility wires

o vicinity of trees

o flocks of birds that may cause interference and potential flight impact

o vicinity of any elevated obstructions that may pose potential flight hazard o vicinity of roadways with
moderate to heavy traffic that can be distracted o public gatherings that may attract viewers

o optional point of control for best visual site of UAS while in flight

• Takeoff and landing

o inspect area for best and safest point of takeoff and landing

o if in a subdivision or area that is within 150 feet of a residential street, post warning sign(s)/stand(s) * Attention
Aerial Photography In Progress - Remain Back 150 Feet "



### Flight Protocol:

• takeoff and land from same location

• remain alert to birds, sound or aircraft, curious public, and approaching vehicles

• do not allow anyone to engage in conversation or distract the remote control pilot

• restrict flight to minimal elevation sufficient to acquire desired results

• remained prepared for emergency landing at all times

• pay attention to flight time

o if possible set a timer as a safety alert land UAS and shut down propulsion immediately following
landing