alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ALEXANDER ZACHARY *vs.*ISAAC HOLDEN.

For the talcing out a State’s warrant which is void for the want of jurisdiction, *trespass,*or *trover,*is the proper action, and not *case.*

ActioN on the oase for maliciously suing out a State’s warrant, tried before bis Honor Judge SaundeRS, at the Spring Term, 1855, of Macon Superior Court.

The warrant upon which the plaintiff was arrested is as follows:

“ Whereas information hath this day been made to me L. C. Hooper, one of the acting justices of the peace for the said County on the oath of Isaac Holden,, that he has reason to believe, and does believe, that Alexander Zachary (and three others, naming them) did shoot an ox of Elisha Holden’s on &c., at &c., against the peace and dignity of the State.

Yon are, therefore, commanded, in the name of the State, to arrest the said Alexander Zachary, &c.”

Upon this warrant the plaintiff was brought before an examining magistrate; the facts disclosed, as the warrant had charged, but a civil trespass. The defendant (the present plaintiff) was discharged by the magistrate with costs.

The plaintiff offered testimony to show malice and a want of probable cause, but his Honor being of opinion that the action was misconceived, that i.t should have been trespass and not case, the plaintiff submitted to a non-suit and appealed.

A. *W. Woodjvn*and *Baxter,*for plaintiff.

*Gaither*and Williams, for defendant.

Peaeson, J.

*Allen*v. *Greenlee,*2 Dev. 370, is a direct authority in support of the decision made in the Court below.

The same principle is applied to a converse state of facts, *Rodgers*v. *Pitman,*2 Jones 56. The two cases settle the rule to be, that where process is valid and sued out maliciously, the proper action is case; where the process is void, as for *454want of jurisdiction, the proper action is trespass *vi eb a/rmis*or trover.

Pee CueiaM. Judgment affirmed.
---

EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Enacted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





FE Battery Metals Corp. (the “Company”)
is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2023 (the “Report”).



I, Jurgen Wolf, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:



(i)  the Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)  the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|/s/ Jurgen Wolf         | 
|----------------------- | 
|Jurgen Wolf             | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 





August 1, 2023



---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 524 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-146, K2025-144.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-25288 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,070<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (204)
<INVENTORY>                                     53,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         83,632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,166
<SALES>                                         16,670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,765
<CGS>                                           11,106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,008
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   121
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,289
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
<FN>
<F1>Balance includes $1,167 of restricted cash.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I Stuart Grayston, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/Stuart Grayston                   
|Stuart Grayston                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|February 3, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 65 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 65

   To apply the rates of duty effective after December 31, 1994, to 
 certain water resistant wool trousers that were entered, or withdrawn 
  from warehouse for consumption, after December 31, 1988, and before 
                            January 1, 1995.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To apply the rates of duty effective after December 31, 1994, to 
 certain water resistant wool trousers that were entered, or withdrawn 
  from warehouse for consumption, after December 31, 1988, and before 
                            January 1, 1995.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN ENTRIES.

    Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other 
provision of law, upon proper request filed with the Customs Service 
within 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry 
or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption--
            (1) that was made after December 31, 1988, and before 
        January 1, 1995, and
            (2) that, if it had been made on January 1, 1995--
                    (A) would have been claimed under subheading 
                6203.41.05 or 6204.61.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 
                Schedule of the United States, and
                    (B) would have had a lower duty,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such entry or withdrawal had 
been made on January 1, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
Co vMvuau:t<.^e5po.. c ^^c^--*- ^^°'^- °^^^ 

lafce Miitchufflfna H«i««woers Association 

late. M}ncft«i«lmi. Alaska »?57 

Kevin Adams 

ySDOT 

m 

Bg 

Washtngtoo, P.C 20§90- •••.'.' 2 ^ 

CD 

MMO:Ma^#dMi©v ••••' 

July 1% mm 

BtarMr. Adams> 

Tfte Mlnchiimfna Howtownefs Assoclatttw h ^ iiwohifieu^ wted to ui^mtly fe^«Mt OOT to 

rw^se its decMoin granting EAS to Warb^^v/s, and award the otntract to Wrigliif s instead tecau$e 

ttie dedston was ba&sa on a seriout mlsunderstandh^. Every re^^nt curreit^ physiatify present at 

the (ah*! came to the mhf 19 meeting of MHA and voted to su^^Nxrt WrteWt*s for tht IAS, 

T%« «»is«nd«r^ndteg o«c»rred wiven a ptt^nal «mrt ffswn Peiw^ and Tom <3r««(\ swppwttng s 

de^o n In fevor of Warhefow's was mistakenly mkm to represent the entire community's opinion. 

On June 28, MtO the commwnlty vot ^ fey a large margin to swpport Wright's, Thec©mm«ntty has 

HOT ¥mm%e4 thfe ^iciskm. fnfi»d, becawe of this stiteys rolsiinderstanrtln^ ii i members mtm wfejh 

to SMppoft Wrfghts Ito reduce the Intense community confftl: that tWs pmbfem has generated. 

we are so sorry atwrt ft« terrible cc^hisfein and wfjs*( to apol^^e to everyon«^ especlaJly to Wright*! 

and WufMlov/s for thi^ unpteai^mt saEtuatJon. Piea»i do aN you can to rect^ ttie problem by 

awardlrig iAS to is^^hts. Tfiank-ytHyi sfneer^. 

/Jute Collins, piimAml Tom ®ree», vice-Pf«ldeftt 

MM toHlns, Secrei^fy Den»% Mannan, T^a^rer 

MHA M«»*ers oreMfttt hi the cfflwwwnitv (ojwtlnued on i,2} 
^. , .^ 

O.WriBhr«*lrServl**«6el.W5AltS.rvlM
#### SANDY McKINLEY *vs.*ALEXANDER C. SCOTT.

A bequest of a slave for the life of the legatee, without any limitation over, passes only a life-estate to such legatee. The assent of the executor extends no further than to the life-interest, and the reversion is in the executor, which he may recover after the falling in of that interest.

ActioN of detiNxie, tried before his Honor, Judge Ellis, at the Spring Term, 1856, of Cabarrus Superior Court.

*198The action, was brought to recover a slave, named *Lizzie,*and her child.

Robert Cochran, who was the owner of Lizzie, made a will, and died in 1855. He bequeathed the slave in question to his grand-daughter, Martha Ann, *dv/rmg her natmrdl life,*and made no further disposition of the slave or her increase. Martha Ann, with the assent of the executor, took possession of the slave, Lizzie, and having intermarried with the defendant, A. C. Scott, the slave went into his possession, and has so remained ever since, having, in the mean time, borne the child, John. Mrs. Scott died in 1851, and the plaintiff, who is the executor of the executor of Robert Cochran, demanded the property, and on defendant’s refusal to surrender it, this suit was brought.

These facts being submitted to his Honor in a case agreed, he gave judgment for the plaintiff, whereupon the defendant appealed.

*Wilson,*for plaintiff.

*Osborne,*for defendant.

Battle, J.

There are three decisons of our Courts directly in point in favor of the plaintiff’s recovery, to wit, an *Anonymous case*in 2 Hay. Rep. 161, *James*v. Masters, 3 Murph. Rep. 110, and *Black*v. *Ray,*1 Dev. and Bat. Rep. 334. These cases establish, beyond question, that the bequest of a slave for life, without limiting the remainder over, passes only a life-estate to the legatee; that the assent of the executor extends no further than to such life-interest; and that the reversion remains in the executor, which he may assert after the death of the life owner. The present plaintiff is the executor of the first executor, and consequently represents the first testator, and may maintain the action. If the defendant has any claim for one-third part of the slave in question, and her issue, he must assert it at the proper time, as the administrator of his wife.

Pek Cukiam. Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1996
<CASH>                                            1031
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1206
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      18045
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            7993
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              8088
<LOANS>                                         103103
<ALLOWANCE>                                        827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  136003
<DEPOSITS>                                       93473
<SHORT-TERM>                                     15357
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                814
<LONG-TERM>                                      13717
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                       12633
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  136003
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   1975
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  380
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   235
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  2590
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1071
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1407
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             1183
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       38
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  23
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    537
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         339
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.98
<LOANS-NON>                                        842
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   305
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    846
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   799
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       11
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  827
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            827
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50457

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RUBEN HURTADO-DIAZ,

also known as Pedro Perez-Roman,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-415-ALL

--------------------

October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ruben Hurtado-Diaz appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Hurtado-Diaz

contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define

separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been

alleged in his indictment. Hurtado-Diaz maintains that he
No. 02-50457

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Hurtado-Diaz acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
ATTACHMENT VI OPTIONAL POLLUTION PREVENTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 32

****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION****

          Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of First Niles Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant") that the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-KSB forthe period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, inall material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.

| Date: March 31, 2005 |  | /s/ William L. StephensWilliam L. StephensPresident and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|----------------------|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |  |                                                                                                 |
|                      |  |                                                                                                 |
|                      |  |                                                                                                 |
|                      |  |                                                                                                 |
|                      |  |                                                                                                 |
| Date: March 31, 2005 |  | /s/ Lawrence SafarekLawrence SafarekVice President and Treasurer*(Principal Financial Officer)* |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# AGENCY:

Agency for International Development (USAID).

# ACTION:

Notice of approved list of candidates.

# SUMMARY:

This notice provides a list of approved candidates who comprise a standing roster for service on the Agency's 2024 Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board. The Agency will use this roster to select SES Performance Review Board members.

# DATES:

October 30, 2024.

# ADDRESSES:

*executiveresources@usaid.gov*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lena Travers, Director, Center for Performance Excellence, Office of Human Capital and Talent Management, USAID, at 202-712-5636 or                         *ltravers@usaid.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Public Law 95-454 (5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4)) and 5 CFR 430.311(a)(4), the Agency must publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     a list of persons named to serve on the Performance Review Board that oversees the evaluation of performance appraisals for SES members of the Agency. The standing roster of approved candidates from which the Agency will select SES Performance Review Board members is as follows:                

Bader, Harry

Ball, Kimberly

Beers, Mia

Bertram, Robert

Borodin, Sara

Broderick, Deborah

Brown, Erin

Buckley, Ruth

Chalif, Rebecca

Davis, Thomas

Detherage, Maria Price

Donohue, Katherine

Ehmann, Claire

ElGohary, Laila

Feinstein, Barbara

Girod, Gayle

Gray, Jason

Healy, Anne

Jin, Jun

Johnson, Mark

Kenon, Clifton

Knudsen, Ciara

Korde, Sonali

Lucas, Rachel

McGill, Brian

McLaughlin, Mary

Metzler, Michael

Mitchell, Reginald

Napoli, Roman

Ohlweiler, John

Pryor, Jeanne

Ram, Pavani

Rodgers, Jami

Schulz, Laura

Shih, Stephen

Singh, Sukhvinder

Sokolowski, Alexander

Voorhees, John

Wallace, Julia

Walton, David

Webb, Patrick

Willis, Lindsey

Winston, Lynn

Wright, Sheila

Lena Travers,

Director, Center for Performance Excellence.

[FR Doc. 2024-25216 Filed 10-29-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116-04-P