alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1




                                                                 EXHIBIT (23)-4




                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-72747) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan of The Banc Corporation and Commerce Bank of Alabama Incentive
Stock Compensation Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-70953) pertaining to The Banc
Corporation 401(k) Plan of our report dated March 3, 1999, with respect to the
financial statements of C&L Bank of Blountstown (not presented separately in the
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K) included in the Annual Report of The Banc
Corporation (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                                    Williams, Cox, Weidner & Cox

Marianna, Florida
March 21, 2000
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SouthFirst Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB, for the quarter-ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Joe K. McArthur, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Janice R. Browning, Controller (principal financial officer) of the Company, do
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  May 15, 2003                           By:  /s/ Joe K. McArthur
                                                   --------------------------
                                                   Joe K. McArthur
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 15, 2003                           By:  /s/ Janice R. Browning
                                                   --------------------------
                                                   Janice R. Browning
                                                   Controller
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Margaret Stroup, Appellant.

Appeal: record.

*Appeal from Polk District Court.*— Hon. Chaeles H. Bishop, Judge.

Friday, October 17, 1890.

The defendant was indicted, tried, convicted and sentenced for the crime of keeping a house of ill-fame, and she appeals.

No appearance for either party.

■Rothrock, C. J.

The appeal is presented to this court upon an indictment and a record entry of a trial by jury, verdict of guilty and judgment upon the verdict. The record does not set forth the evidence nor the instructions of the court to the jury. An examination of the record as presented discloses no error, and the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                               CERTIFICATE OF THE
                           CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                             TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350):

         I, Kathy J. Johnston, Vice President of Tower Automotive, Inc.,
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

         (1)      The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and;

         (2)      The information contained in this quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tower
Automotive, Inc.

                                  TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

Date: November 12, 2003           By: /s/ Kathy J. Johnston
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Kathy J. Johnston
                                  Its:  Vice President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tower Automotive, Inc. and will be retained by Tower Automotive,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Geo. C. Hull, for the use of, etc., Appellee, v. M. R. Loughlin, Intervenor, Appellant.

Appeal: certified question of law : review.

*Appeal from Boone District*Court. — Hon. D. E. Hindman, Judge.

Tuesday, February 3, 1891.

The amount in controversy is less than one hundred dollars, and the question for us must arise on a certificate of the district judge presenting a law question. The question certified is as follows: Whether, under the issues made in the petition, answer, motion and amendment thereto of said Hull, and the pleading of said Loughlin (said pleadings being attached to the certificate, and being the same as hereinbefore set out), where said motion of said Hull is made and filed after verdict, judgment and payment thereof by defendant, said *726Hull is entitled to one-half of the amount recovered upon the bond of a permit-holder, given under provisions of Acts, Twenty-second General Assembly, chapter 71 thereof, or whether the entire amount so recovered on such bond .belongs to and should be paid to the school fund of the county wherein the action is brought.” The district court gave judgment for plaintiff, and the intervenor appeals. *Dismissed.*

*C lay ton Harrington, S. B. Dyer*and *J. B. Wlvittalcer,*for appellant.

*OrooJcs & Jordan,*for appellee.

Granger, J.

We are without jurisdiction in this case. Under the statute as construed, the district court must certify to us a “ question of law.” A question of law for the purpose of the statute can only arise on a known state of facts. Under the certificate before us, we are to go to the petition, answer, motion, amendment and another pleading, and formulate a state of facts as a basis for legal inquiry. We have not the rig-lit. nor are we disposed to do this. The-certificate should present to us the question, and not direct us to the-place where the material for one can be found. If we were to entertain this case, the way would be open, in such cases, for the determination of questions at our instance, rather than that of the district court, as the law contemplates. .This holding has been so frequent that we-need not refer to cases.

The appeal is dismissed,
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON . D.C .

Agreement s Adopte d b yth e Traffi c Conference s of th e internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n OST-2009-028 4

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S

B YTH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPORTASSOCIATIO N lAT A AGREEMEN T APPROVE D & IMMUNIZE D 

### DOCKE T OST - 0* J - d^B H ACTIO N DAT E^1^^^! , 7^ /

i Thi s approval andgran t

o f antitrus t immunity i s subject , wher e applicable , to condition s previousl y imposed . Thi s actio n i s effectiv e after 7 day s unles s apetitio n i s filedunde r 1 4 CF R385.3 0 o r

arevie w i s undertake n o n th e Department' s ow n motion . I n view o f th e agreement' s noncontroversia l natur e an dth e availability o f th e abov e prjX^dure , th e 21;stja;^erjiMHni4CF R303.4 2 i s waived . T7* ^ 

# f ETrector

, Offic e o f

Internationa l Aviatio n 0 2 Novembe r200 9 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Dougla s E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Internationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n 177 6 KSt . N.W . #12* " Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00538-CR

Cheri Lucille Howard, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 69690, THE HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Cheri Lucille Howard appeals from a judgment convicting her of

possession of a controlled substance less than one gram, enhanced. See Tex. Health & Safety Code

Ann. § 481.115 (West 2010).

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there

are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);

Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009);see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of her right to examine the

appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. Appellant has filed letters

with the Court. Although she raises the failure to receive effective counsel as a possible ground for
appeal, she requests that the appeal be dismissed. We have independently reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. See Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with appellant’s counsel that the record reflects no arguably

meritorious grounds for review and that the appeal is frivolous. 

However, as pointed out by appellant’s counsel in his brief, the judgment orders

appellant to pay court costs of $306 and attorney’s fees of $450 after release from incarceration. “A

defendant who is determined by the court to be indigent is presumed to remain indigent for the

remainder of the proceedings in the case unless a material change in the defendant’s financial

circumstances occurs.” Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(p) (West Supp. 2012); Mayer

v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552, 557 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The trial court determined that appellant was

indigent, and we find nothing in the record to support a finding that appellant’s financial

circumstances have materially changed. Therefore, no evidence supports the trial court’s order

requiring appellant to pay court costs and attorney’s fees. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art.

26.05(g) (West Supp. 2012). Accordingly, we modify the judgment to reflect that appellant does not

owe court costs or attorney’s fees.

As modified, the judgment of conviction is affirmed and counsel’s motion to

withdraw is granted.

2
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field

Modified and, as Modified, Affirmed

Filed: February 28, 2013

Do Not Publish

3
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jesse James Rodriguez, * From the 21st District

 Court of Bastrop County,

 Trial Court No. 13977.

Vs. No. 11-12-00022-CR * January 30, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**Data Needed on Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Facilities**

 Facility Data o **Tools for Bending, Incorporated** o **194 W Dakota Ave, Denver , Denver County,**  **CO 80223 -** **2195** o **39:42:33.1560 ,**  **104:59:28.1436**

 Process Ty

pe o **Hard chromium electroplating** o **No o**  **ther electroplating**  o **Until 2004, a co**  **- located**  **degreasing process was subject to MACT Subpart T. However, source switched to an exempt solvent, and the MACT is no longer**  **applicable.**

 Tank #1 Design and Operation o **Dimensions unknown**  **, 200 gallon capacity** o **Rectifier capacity:**  **2,000 Amps** o **No permitted limit to hours of operation. Reported hours are 2,080 per year.**   Tank #2 Design and Operation o **Dimensions unknown**  **, 130 gallon capacity** o **Rectifier capacity: 500 Amps**  o **No permitted limit to hours of operation. Reported hours**  **are 2,080 per year.**  Tank #3 Design and Operation o **Dimensions unknown**  **, 175 gallon capacity** o **Rectifier capacity: 1,000 Amps**  o **No permitted limit to hours of operation. Reported hours are 2,080 per year.**   Tank #4 Design and Operation o **Dimensions unknown**  **, 175 gallo n capacity**  o **Rectifier capacity: 750 Amps**  o **No permitted limit to hours of operation. Reported hours are 2,080 per year.** 

 Emission Control Technology o **Custom -**  **made Packed**  **- bed scrubber and surface tension control**  **(Fumatrol)** o **Operating Limits**

**–**  **Scrubber: Pressure differential between 0.0” W.C. and 1.2” W.C.**   **Duct Velocity Pressure: For all tanks, between 0.009” W.C. and 0.011” W.C.**  **Surface tension: For tank #1 ≤ 50 dynes/cm, for tank #2 ≤ 52 dynes/cm, for**  **tank #3 ≤ 56 dynes/cm, for tank #4 ≤ 58 dynes/cm.** 

 Emission Test Data o **The State’s test report is unavailable.** Other Available Supporting Documents

o **Based on stack testing results of 0.008 g / dscm, calculated chromium emissions (assuming controls, 1,743 dscm**  **/ hour and 2080 hours) for the facility is 0.06 lbs / year.**  o **[ See Attached Original Permit Application**  **]** o **[ See Attached Construction Permit** **]**
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 D0 37 0 . W ESLEY B. W I LLI AMS v . J ULI A F. W I LLI AMS.

W e d i sm i ss ed W es l ey B. W i l l i am s ’ s p ro s e ap pl i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal
b ecau s e i t ap p eared t h at h e was s ti l l rep res en t ed b y co u n s el an d t h erefo re h i s p ro s e
ap p li cat io n was a n u l l i t y

. On m o t i on fo r reco ns i d erat i o n , h o w e v e r , Wi l l i am s

m ai n t ai n s t h at hi s co u n sel w i t h d rew fro m rep res en t at i o n o n M arch 1 7
, 2 0 1 7.
Acco rd in g ly
, we GRANT th e m o t i o n fo r reco n s i derat io n an d VACATE ou r p rev i ou s

o rd er d i s m i s s i n g t h e ap p l i cat i o n , wh i ch i s h ereb y REINSTATED. Up o n co n s id era t i o n o f t h e m eri t s , h owev er, t h e ap p l i cat i on fo r d i s cret i o n ary
ap p eal i s DENIED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. May 17, 2017

05/17/2017
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2212]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       HONORING THE SERVICE OF U.S. CONGRESSMAN DAVE WELDON, M.D.

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JOHN L. MICA

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, October 2, 2008

  Mr. MICA. Madam Speaker, I rise today to honor and pay tribute to 
U.S. Congressman Dave Weldon, M.D. who I have had the privilege to 
serve with over the last 14 years in the House of Representatives.
  Congressman Weldon, Florida's doctor, will be retiring at the end of 
the 110th Congress after being first elected to the House in 1994. He 
has been a great example of a citizen legislator--giving up successful 
professional careers in the U.S. Army and in medicine and in 
sacrificing time with family to serve our nation.
  Not only is Rep. Weldon a brilliant physician, but throughout his 
tenure in Congress, he has been a provider of leadership in 
representing Florida's Space Coast. When Dave spoke on the floor, he 
spoke with knowledge, insight and understanding. Not only did he 
contribute to the legislative process, but he also improved the 
legislative product.
  I am pleased to have this opportunity to salute Rep. Weldon and his 
wife Nancy for their public service. Madam Speaker, I ask all Members 
of the U.S. House of Representatives to join me in recognizing 
Congressman Weldon's service to our nation through all aspects of his 
life. To Dave and his family, we extend our sincere thanks and well 
wishes for the future.

                          ____________________
```
### Regula tory Eva luati o n
Doc ke t No

. FAA- 

# 20/3-0300 Directorat e Identifi er : 0 7 -AD-6 3 RI 

## 2.0 

## I /-A/,M-



## /~ 

## 3-A-D

..lcld till! work Jwun. paris co.\ I. and 11111/Jher (?( l 

### i. S. re::istercd JII"Oc/uc/

., to th e lclhh· helm1. W/11 .:11 you are 

### finish e d. clic:k 011 !Itt! · ' 

### Updc1fe Fii!lch •· hu11 o n 

### f cJ

**£111£01/totical~t:ji/1** in ti ll! tcllafs. 

### U

pdat e



# Fi **ld**

**~** Estimated Cos t s: Ac t io n C os t s per Product (e.g., airc r a ft . e ngi ne. (e.g .. I nspection , pro p e ller , appliance) Work -h our s Labo r Parts C os t Total Co s t s Number of To t al C os t replacement) (includ e cos t ( lab o r + 

## u. s. fo r U.S. F l ee t D o n ot i n cl u de 011- co nditio n c osts her e a ccess, t es tin g . (@S 8 5 / h pa rts ) R e g istered and close-up) o u r) Produ c t s In sp e cti o n f o r m iss in g p ar t s 

### .6 9 Torque cross bolts 

### .5 9 Measure ex te n s ion of 

### .5 9 lat c h p in s In spect io n of cam l a tch es f o r li p 1.6 

### 9 defo rm ati o n



## I I 

## I I

T he kn ow n n u mb e r of produ c t s in co mplianc e : 

# 'l

**l,~.r** T o t a l Cos t s of co mp lian ce fo r U. S. fl ee t : $2.4 -1 8 Cos t s covered u nde r w arranty 

### (if kumm) 

### S " • '*I \ O n -Condi t io n Costs :



## ~ Act i o n W o rk- hours La bor cost Pa r ts Co s t Cos t p e r Produ c t ( e .g. , In s p e ct ion , (incl u d e a c ce s s. (@ £8 5/ hour) rep la cem e n t ) t est ing. and cl ose - up )**~i\** (}.II(,. 

# f.**e~** Replacement o f broken / missing cam lat ch R

ep lac emen t of b rokcn /m i ss ing la t ch pin Replac e m en t of brok cn / m is sin g latch pin cross bolt HFEC 

### or m ag n e ti

c p

a

rticl e inspect i on of 

### cam latc h Main cargo door rig check and rep lacemen t of alloy steel cross bolts through t he latc h pi n s w i

th CRES cross bolts In spec ti o n o f m a ting par t s 

### .S
.I 

### ., 1 '


### I ·'


### 4 9

.6**~** 

## fJ..Jr..tJl

I

### "II('~ l iM.

.

( I S p ecia l co n s i de r atio n s fo r Eco n omic A n alysis ( U se this .field / o explain anylh in g i n 1 he Est im ated Cos t s ta ble th at was ass um e d or mig Itt not b e obvious
. This field can also be used t o exp l ain warran t y costs) : Exec uti ve O rd ct· 12866 :**~:i'h** 

### Could the AD be cons idered a**'significant** 

### regulatory**acti on** **~** 

### *Ex pl a n atio n: DOT H.eg u lato r y Po li cies and Pt·oce dures: 

### I s the AD s ig nificant ?

# ~ *Explana ti on : Rcgulato t · y F l ex i bility A ct: 

### YES* 

### 0 NO 

### lZI

YES* 

### 0**NO~**



### Will th e AD have a 

### s ignificant economic impa ct on a 

### subs t antial num b e r of s mall ent ities ? E xplai n for e ith er a 

### Ye s o r No an s w e r.

# ~ YES 

### 0**NO ~**  

### Explana ti on : Intrastate Av i atio n in A l aska: 

### This AD co uld affect intrastate av i at io n in Alaska. I s it appropriate to 

### in c l ud e specific r eq uire ments for airc r aft ope r ated in Alaska whe re aviation mi g ht be the only m ode 

### of transporta ti on?

# ~ YES* 

### 0**NO ~** 

### *Explanation:
EXHIBIT 11.1

                        DENAMERICA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              Statement re: computation of per share income (loss)
                 (In thousands, except share and per share data)


                                                              Period ended
                                                              ------------
                                                         July 3,        July 2,
                         Description                      1996            1997
                         -----------                   -----------    ----------
                                                       (14 weeks)     (13 weeks)

Income (loss) before extraordinary item............       $697          $(350)
Extraordinary item - loss on extinguishment
    of debt........................................       ----            ----
                                                          ----            ----

Net Income (loss) .................................        697           (350)

Less:  Preferred stock dividend and accretion......       ----            ----
                                                          ----            ----

Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders       $697          $(350)
                                                          ====          ======

Income (loss) before extraordinary item per
   common and common equivalent share..............       $.05          $(.03)
Extraordinary item - loss on extinguishment
   of debt per common and common equivalent
   share...........................................       ----            ----
                                                          ----            ----

Net income (loss) per common and common
equivalent share...................................       $.05          $(.03)
                                                          ====          ======

Weighted average common and common equivalent
   shares outstanding.............................. 13,649,000      13,414,000
                                                    ==========      ==========
                                       21
<PAGE>   1

          REPORT OF REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




Mid-State Trust VII
         And
First Union National Bank of Florida

                     MID-STATE HOMES, INC. SERVICING REPORT

We have examined management's assertion about Mid-State Trust VII's compliance
with the applicable minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended May 31, 1999, included in the
accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for Mid-State Trust
VII's compliance with those applicable minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about Mid-state Trust VII's compliance with
the applicable minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on Mid-State Trust VII's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Mid-State Trust VII complied with
the aforementioned applicable minimum servicing standards as of and for the year
ended May 31, 1999, is fairly stated, in all material respects.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Tampa, Florida
July 14, 1999