alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of clickNsettle.com, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the three and six months ended December 31, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form
      10-QSB”), I, Roy Israel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
                Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
                material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Dated:
      February 9, 2006








/s/
      Roy Israel


Roy
      Israel - Chairman of the Board, CEO and President
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60482 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MALCOLM JAMES HARGROVE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:00-CR-72-1-P

-------------------- December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Malcolm James Hargrove, federal prisoner # 11229-042 (“Hargrove”), appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Hargrove’s motion stems from his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine, for which he received the statutory mandatory-minimum 60-month sentence pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B). Hargrove hadNo. 01-60482 -2- unsuccessfully requested a safety-valve reduction in his sentence pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines § 5C1.2. He did not appeal his sentence. The present motion asserts that he was entitled to a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because he qualified for the safety valve. Hargrove’s sentence-reduction motion was not authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which permits a defendant to seek a sentence reduction when the term of imprisonment is based on a sentencing range that subsequently has been lowered. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Hargrove’s sentence was based on the statutory mandatory-minimum sentence, not a sentencing range, and the safety-valve provision was in place at the time of sentencing and therefore does not constitute a new sentencing guideline for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Although the district court did not specify the reason for the denial of the motion, it should have been denied for lack of jurisdiction, Early , 27 F.3d at 142, and we affirm on that basis.
AFFIRMED.
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: March 10, 2016 521399

________________________________ In the Matter of INJAH UNIQUE TAFARI, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BRANDI COLLYER, as Supervisor of the Inmate Grievance Program, et al., Respondents.

________________________________ Calendar Date: January 19, 2016 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________ Injah Unique Tafari, Elmira, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondents.

__________ Appeal from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered June 10, 2015 in Franklin County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination that restricted the number of grievances that petitioner was permitted to file each week at Upstate Correctional Facility due to his misuse of the inmate grievance program. Supreme Court granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition as moot and this appeal ensued. We affirm. The record establishes that, during the pendency of the proceeding, petitioner was transferred to another-2- 521399

correctional facility and, as a result, the restriction regarding the filing of grievances by petitioner at Upstate Correctional Facility was lifted. As petitioner was no longer subject to the administrative action that curtailed the number of weekly grievances that he was permitted to file, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition as moot (see Matter of Campbell v Fischer, 105 AD3d 1222, 1222 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 853 [2013]; Matter of Patel v New York State Dept. of Corr. Servs., 84 AD3d 1668, 1669 [2011]; Matter of Johnson v Goord, 289 AD2d 625, 625 [2001], appeal dismissed and lv denied 97 NY2d 723 [2002]). We are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that the matter falls within the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713 [1980]; Matter of Johnson v Goord, 289 AD2d at 625). McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
**EXHIBIT 10.15(b)****SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE**     THISSECOND AMENDMENT to Lease (“Second Amendment”) is dated forreference purposes December 10th,2007 and is entered into by and between **ProLogis California I LLC**(“Landlord”), and **Skechers USA,Inc**(“Tenant”).**RECITALS**     WHEREAS Landlord and Tenant executed that certain lease dated November 21, 1997, a First Amendmentto Lease dated April 26, 2002 (collectively, the “Lease”) whereby Landlord leased to Tenant thosecertain Premises comprised of approximately 127,799 square feet commonly known as 1661 S. VintageAvenue, Ontario, California 91761 (the “Premises”). Capitalized terms used and not otherwisedefined herein shall have the meanings given those terms in the original Lease dated November 21,1997, and or subsequent amendments, as applicable.     WHEREAS Tenant and Landlord desire to amend the Lease, including but not limited to the extensionof the Lease Term, pursuant to this Second Amendment to Lease.     NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are herebyacknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Lease as follows:**1.****Term:**  The Term shall be extended for One year (1) and six (6) monthsand shall commence on December 1, 2007 and shall expire on May 31, 2009.The monthly triple net Base Rent during the extended Term shall be asfollows:       Months Monthly Base Rent  December 1, 2007-May 31, 2009 $48,563.62/Mo./NNN**2.****Other Terms and Conditions:**All other terms of the Lease shall remain unmodified and infull force and effect.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Second Amendment to Lease as of the day andyear first above written.
**TENANT:**SKECHERS USA, INC       By: /s/ David Weinberg      Name: David Weinberg      Title: Chief Operating Officer   **LANDLORD:**PROLOGIS CALIFORNIA I LLC
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 705 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 705

             To repeal section 8003 of Public Law 105-174.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 1999

 Mr. Ashcroft introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To repeal section 8003 of Public Law 105-174.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Home Page Tax Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 8003 of the 1998 Supplemental Appropriations 
and Rescissions Act (112 Stat. 93) is repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall be 
effective as of April 30, 1998.

SEC. 3. USE OF FUNDS.

    The National Science Foundation may use funds appropriated for 
fiscal year 1999 to meet any obligations resulting from the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 14-15-00190-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEEN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

HOUSTON, TEXAS
CHRISTINE E. REULE, Appellant

v. JOHN R. BELUS Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from Cause No. 2014-37325 190 TH Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas

__________________________________________________________________ APPELLANT’S STATEMENT TO COURT THAT ITS’ NOT

PROVIDING NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHRISTINE E. REULE Pro Se 1831 Sherwood Forest #24 Houston, Texas 77043 (713) 365-0535 ACCEPTED 14-15-00190-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/19/2015 4:25:17 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKIDENTITY OF PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL

Appellant, Christine E. Reule, hereby certifies tha t the following are the list of parties and their respective counsel, i f any, to the best of her knowledge and understanding of the rules.

PARTIES COUNSEL
Appellant CHRISTINE E. REULE Pro Se 1831 Sherwood Forest #24 Houston, Texas 77043 (713) 365-0535 Creule@msn.com
Appellee JOHN R. BELUS D. John Neese 2118 Smith Street Houston, Texas 77002 jneese@hmgnc.com
KELLY SANCHEZ AND VALLOUREC Jeffrey D. Burbach DRILLING PRODUCTS USA, INC Jackson Walker L.L.P. 1401 McKinney, Suite 1900 Houston, Texas 77010 713.752.4262 (direct) jburbach@jw.com WENDY HATZ AND DURA BOND PIPE COREY REED Thompson Coe Cousins & Irons, L.L.P One Riverway, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas 77056 Phone: 713-403-8213 creed@thompsoncoe.comTO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

Christine E. Reule, Appellant, and those similarly situated,
respectfully submits this Statement/Notice to this Court that it is
not providing copies of documents to all parties, a nd would show

the Court as follows:
On February 20, 2015, Appellant filed an appeal of her entire
case, obviously, including all parties. Appellant was informed today
by Mr. Jeffrey Burbach, attorney for Kelly Sanchez and Vallourec
Drilling Products USA, Inc., that he is not getting notices from the
Court of Appeals. Appellant is not sure why, but wa nts the court to
be aware of the situation and to ensure that all pa rties are provided
with proper notices. Therefore, Appellant asks th is court to please
include all parties in its notices.
Dated: March 19, 2015 Respectfully submitted,
/s/Christine Reule

________________________________ Christine E. Reule 1831 Sherwood Forest #24 Houston, Texas 77043 Creule@msn.comCERTIFICATE OF MAILING

The above and foregoing document was served in acc ordance

with Rule 21a on this 19 th day of March 2015, on all interested
parties in this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         674,695
<SECURITIES>                                   609,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,323,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                    56,401
<INVENTORY>                                     80,688
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,637,692
<PP&E>                                         767,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                 701,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,076,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,280,816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,982,842
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,186,682)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,076,976
<SALES>                                      4,677,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,677,971
<CGS>                                          756,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,622,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,566,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                504,061
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            504,061
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   504,061
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Robert GreenbergRobert GreenbergChief Executive Officer
<Page>

EXHIBIT 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES

<Table>
<Caption>

                                                                                    NAME(S) UNDER WHICH
                                                   JURISDICTION OF                  SUBSIDIARIES DO
SUBSIDIARY NAME                                    INCORPORATION                    BUSINESS(1)
--------------                                     ---------------                  -------------------
<S>                                                <C>                              <C>
Ram-Pak Compaction Systems Ltd.                    Canada
1364927 Ontario Limited                            Ontario, Canada
1364928 Ontario Limited                            Ontario, Canada
Z Best Waste Systems Inc.                          Alberta, Canada
West Coast Survival & Safety Inc.                  British Columbia, Canada
No. 400 Sail View Ventures Ltd.                    British Columbia, Canada
Active Disposal & Recycling Ltd.                   British Columbia, Canada
CERI, INC.                                         Delaware
CERI, LLC(2)                                       Delaware
Capital Environmental Holdings Inc.(2)             Delaware
Waste Services Inc.(3)                             Ontario, Canada                  WSI
                                                                                    WSI Waste Services
                                                                                    Waste Services
HWM Ltd.(4)                                        Ontario, Canada
1427255 Ontario Inc.(4)                            Ontario, Canada
NDC Management Services Inc.(4)                    Ontario, Canada
943162 Ontario Inc.(4)                             Ontario, Canada
Huneault Sales & Equipment Ltd.(4)                 Ontario, Canada
Mer Bleue Developments Inc.(4)                     Ontario, Canada

</Table>

--------
(1) Unless otherwise indicated, each subsidiary listed does business under its
    corporate name
(2) A wholly-owned subsidiary of CERI, INC.

(3) Owned by Capital Environmental Resource Inc., 1364927 Ontario Limited and
    1364928 Ontario Limited.
(4) A wholly-owned subsidiary of Waste Services Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0403

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM HOMER MCCLELLAN,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 6, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 11 2023

07/11/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0403
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Pages H10670-H10671]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

  A message from the Senate by Ms. Curtis, one of its clerks, announced 
that the Senate has passed without amendment bills of the House of the 
following titles:

       H.R. 3480. An act to direct the United States Sentencing 
     Commission to assure appropriate punishment enhancements for 
     those involved in receiving stolen property where that 
     property consists of grave markers of veterans, and for other 
     purposes.

[[Page H10671]]

       H.R. 6296. An act to extend through 2013 the authority of 
     the Federal Election Commission to impose civil money 
     penalties on the basis of a schedule of penalties established 
     and published by the Commission.
       H.R. 7082. An act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
     1986 to permit the Secretary of the Treasury to disclose 
     certain prisoner return information to the Federal Bureau of 
     Prisons, and for other purposes.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 158 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10129]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  JACOB M. LOWELL POST OFFICE BUILDING

  The bill (H.R. 6681) to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 300 Vine Street in New Lenox, Illinois, as 
the ``Jacob M. Lowell Post Office Building,'' was ordered to a third 
reading, read the third time, and passed.

                          ____________________
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Keith A. Anderson, Acting Director District Department of the Environment Department ofthe Environment Air Quality Dhision 1200 1st St., NE, 5thFloor Washington, D.C. 20002
Dear Mr. Anderson: 

### MAY 032013

On April 15, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the District of Columbia's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by your department on AprilS, 2013, pertaining to amendments to Chapters 1 and 2 ofTitle 20 (Environment) ofthe District of Columbia Municipal Regulations (DCMR). EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking action.
Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them toPaul Wentworth, Office ofPermits and Air Toxics, at (215) 814-2183. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

cc: Ms. Cecily Beall, DDOE Ms. Lauren Maxwell, DDOE Sincerely,

# ])**l~~Q ~**  Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                                                                                

                               WEEKS CORPORATION

               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Three Months    Three Months    Nine Months     Nine Months
                                                      Ended          Ended           Ended           Ended
     (In thousands, except per share data)        Sept. 30,1997  Sept. 30, 1996  Sept. 30, 1997  Sept. 30, 1996
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>
Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                                  17,693          11,174          15,904          11,162
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options
  (determined under the Treasury Stock Method)            --              --              --              --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average number of common
  and common equivalent shares outstanding            17,693          11,174          15,904          11,162
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income                                           $ 5,768         $ 3,033         $14,673         $ 9,226
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per share data:
  Net income per common share                        $  0.33         $  0.27         $  0.92         $  0.83
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>