alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                      OF
                           TORCHMARK CAPITAL TRUST I

          This Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Trust of Torchmark
Capital Trust I (the "Trust") is being executed as of November 1, 2001 for the
purpose of amending the Certificate of Trust of the Trust filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on July 21, 1999 (the "Certificate
of Trust") pursuant to the Delaware Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C. (S)(S) 3801
                                                           ---- --
et seq. (the "Act").
-- ----

          The undersigned hereby certifies that Section 2 of the Certificate of
Trust is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

          2.   Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the Delaware
               ----------------
resident trustee of the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the
Act are as follows:

               The Bank of New York (Delaware)
               White Clay Center, Route 273
               Newark, Delaware 19711

          IN WITNESS THEREOF, the undersigned, being a trustee of the Trust, has
duly executed this Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Trust as of the
day and year first above written.

                              /s/ Michael J. Klyce
                              --------------------
                              Name: Michael J. Klyce
                              Title: Regular Trustee
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          37,203
<SECURITIES>                                     9,664
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                       849
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,719
<PP&E>                                          16,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,349
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,585
<SALES>                                         21,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,892
<CGS>                                            1,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,203)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       451
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,654)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,654)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.60)
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 30056

DARRYL J. STERLING , Petitioner

- Appellant

v.
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN , LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:11

- CV

- 449

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Darryl Sterling, Louisiana prisoner # 306435, seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). “This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdic tion, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). A timely notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement in a civil case

. Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007)

. Sterling had 3 0 days, or until January 15 ,

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 23, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-30056 Document: 00513648943 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/23/2016No. 16

- 30056

2 2016 , to file a timely notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). He did not file a notice of appeal until after th is appeal period expired. He also does not certify that he placed his notice of appeal in the prison mail system “on or before th e last day for filing .” Fed. R. App

. P. 25(a)(2)(C)

. Indeed, the certificate of service accompanying Sterling’s notice of appeal states that he placed that notice in the prison mail system on January 18, 2016. Finally, Sterling “filed no motion to excus e the delay under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5).” Henry v. Estelle , 688 F.2d 407, 407 (5th Cir. 1982) ; see Mann v. Lynaugh , 840 F.2d 1194, 1198

– 99 & n.4 (5th Cir. 1988)

. Because Sterling did not file a timely notice of appeal, Sterling’s motion for a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Case: 16-30056 Document: 00513648943 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/23/2016
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Enacted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Cream Minerals Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (the Report).



I, Frank A. Lang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Frank A. Lang

Frank A. Lang

President and Chief Executive Officer



September 29, 2006















---

Exhibit 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Enacted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Cream Minerals Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (the Report).



I, Shannon M. Ross, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(iii)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(iv)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Shannon Ross

Shannon M. Ross

Chief Financial Officer



September 29, 2006
```

[Federal Register: March 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 47)]
[Notices]               
[Page 11619-11620]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11mr10-106]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6917]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Nolde: Except Ye Become as Little Children''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Nolde: Except Ye Become as Little 
Children,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the object at the 
Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, MO, from on or about March 
22, 2010, until on or about July 20, 2010, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these

[[Page 11620]]

Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the exhibit object, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: March 3, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-5266 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                4219
<SECURITIES>                                          2404
<RECEIVABLES>                                        40406
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (1186)
<INVENTORY>                                          47803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    101854
<PP&E>                                               32896
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (15535)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      138321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                85452
<BONDS>                                              10000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               111
<OTHER-SE>                                           25017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        138321
<SALES>                                              31280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     31280
<CGS>                                                21762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         9518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (462)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    2440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (10181)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (3665)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (6101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (6101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.55)    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.55)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,517,105
<PP&E>                                      10,323,986
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,063,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,242,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,827,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,475,260
<COMMON>                                         1,936
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,062,532)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (3,585,336)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,208,738
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,267,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,261,473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             201,150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (521,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (521,564)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2217]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

RECOGNIZING THE HONORABLE BUD CRAMER AND THE HONORABLE TERRY EVERETT ON 
                     THEIR RETIREMENT FROM CONGRESS

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. BOB GOODLATTE

                              of virginia

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, October 3, 2008

  Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Speaker, I wanted to take the time to recognize 
the retirement of my friend and colleague from Alabama: Terry Everett. 
Terry has served the people of the Second District of Alabama with 
honor and distinction for the past eight terms. He has been a faithful 
public servant fighting for farmers, veterans, and conservative values.
  Terry has served on four committees including Agriculture, Armed 
Services, Veterans Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence. However, I would like to highlight Terry's extraordinary 
work for the agriculture community. As a farmer himself, Terry brought 
real world experience to the committee, experience that we see less and 
less from our members. The country as a whole has become more suburban 
and urban, and the members who represent it have followed. He knew 
firsthand how the laws we passed in the Agriculture Committee impacted 
the livelihood of our producers.
  Since coming to Congress in 1993, Terry has been a strong and 
consistent voice for not only the producers of Alabama, but the entire 
Nation. Agriculture is Alabama's largest industry and Terry served as 
the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Specialty Crops and Foreign 
Agriculture Programs during the 2002 Farm Bill. He also currently sits 
on that subcommittee and the Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit and 
Energy and Research.
  The peanut farmer knew no better friend than Congressman Everett. He 
served as a co-chair of the House Congressional Peanut Caucus. Under 
his leadership on the 2002 Farm Bill, the peanut industry moved from a 
60-year-old Depression-era supply management program to a thriving 
industry that could respond to market signals and bring peanut farmers 
into the 21st century.
  During the 2008 Farm Bill, Terry expanded his reach and authored a 
provision to help producers who were suffering from drought. This 
provision provided a cost-sharing component for producers to build 
irrigation ponds for their crops during periods of drought. Without 
this provision, many producers in the South would not have been able to 
cover the cost of an irrigation pond project. This was yet another 
example of Terry taking the lead on an issue that was critically 
important to the livelihood of producers across the Nation.
  His leadership and experience will be missed. But, we do wish him and 
his wife Barbara all the best for a wonderful retirement.

                          ____________________
```
#### W. R. SAVAGE to the use of MILLS E. G. BARRETT *v.*WILLIE CARTER and others.

An action at law upon a note payable to *B. agent of A.,*brought before the adoption of the present Code, should have been in the name of B., as plaintiff, and not in that of A.

*(Grist y. Backhouse,*4 D. and B. 362; *BowdY. Wadswoi'th,*2 Dev. 130; *Waddell*v. *Mowe,*2 Ire. 261, cited and approved, *Whitehead*v. *Riddick,*12 Ire. 95, cited, distinguished and approved.) '

Debt upon bond, tried before Pool, *J.,*at Fall Term 1869 of Bertie Court.

Tbe plaintiff declared upon a bond for money, payable by tbe defendants to “ Mills E. G. Barrett, agent of William E. Savage.”

Tbe defendants pleaded tbe General Issue, and moved for a non-suit, on tbe ground of variance.

In obedience to an intimation from bis Honor, *the*plaintiff submitted to a non-suit, and appealed.

*Peebles &*Peebles, *and Rogers &*Batchelor, for tbe appellant.

A *principal*may sue upon a bond in wbicb bis name is disclosed as sucli. Add., Oont. 9 and 10, Obitty, Oont. 231, *Whitehead*v. *Riddick,*12 Ire. 95.

*Smith, contra.*

*197Tbe legal contract is with Barrett, tbe subjoined words being merely, *of description.*Brown on Actions (45 Law Lib.) 100,1 Obit. PI. 9 ; Brown on Parties (56 Law Lib.) 42, 3, *Schaeh*v. *Anthony,*1 M. and S. 573 j *'Buckley*v. *Ilardy,*5 B. and A. (11 E. O. L.) 355; *Grist*y. *Backhouse,*4 D. and B. 362.

Eodmaít, J.

This was an action of debt, brought before the adoption of the Code of Oiyil Procedure by wbicb the law in respect to parties to actions is materially altered. We are therefore to decide the question presented on the law as it stood when the action was brought. By its express provisions the Code does not apply to such actions, until after judgment. The bond sued on, was payable to *u*Mills E. G. Barrett, agent of Wm. E. Savage,” for the hire of certain slaves. It is a deed poll: it does not appear, except inferentially, to whom the slaves belonged. Therefore *Whitehead*v. *Riddick,*12 Ire. 95, wbicb was a deed *interpon-tes,*is not applicable. It is said in 1 *Chit. Pl.*3, “ If a bond be given to A, conditioned for the payment of money to him for the use or benefit of B, or conditioned to pay the money to B, the action must be brought in the name of A, and B, cannot sue for or release the demand.” The reasons for this doctrine are previously stated. Conformable to it are several decisions in this court. In *Grist*v. *Backhouse,*4 D. & B. 362, the note was payable to “ Eicbard Grist, agent of bis assignees,” in *Dowd*v. *Wadsworth,*2 Dev. 130, it was payable to A, guardian of B : In *Waddell*v. *Moore,*2 Ire. 261, it was payable to A, executor of B. In the two first of these cases it was held that the legal payee was the only proper plaintiff, and in the last, that the executor need not describe himself as executor, and such description was sur-plusage. We think ourselves bound by these authorities, especially by *Grist*v. *Backhouse,*as being most closely in point, in the present case.

The Judgment below must be affirmed.

Pee Cubiam. Judgment affirmed..
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the condensed
financial statements for the period ended September 30, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,504,749
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,361,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    485,473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,969,269
<PP&E>                                         393,243
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,591,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,767,893
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,970
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,694,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,591,284
<SALES>                                        12,226,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,226,304
<CGS>                                          2,807,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,807,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,870,193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (72,436)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,754,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,754,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,754,060)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.50)
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Financial Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard H. Flake,
Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                    /s/ Richard H. Flake
                                    --------------------
                                    Richard H. Flake
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    Officer


Date: October 29, 2004
      ----------------