alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanguine Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), we,
Thomas C. Drees, President and Chief Executive Officer and David Nelson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: 5/25/2005                          /s/Thomas C. Drees
      -----------------                    -------------------------------
                                           Thomas C. Drees
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Director

Dated: 5/25/2005                           /s/David E. Nelson
      -----------------                    -------------------------------
                                           David E. Nelson
                                           Chief Financial Officer,
                                           Secretary/Treasurer and
                                           Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925664
<NAME> ST. JAMES GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,631
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,866)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  87
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (87)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (87)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (87)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        


</TABLE>
#### Joshua Earp, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error. George Earp, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

There being no evidence to support the verdict, a new trial will be ordered.

New trial. Before Judge McCutchen. Bartow Superior Court. September Term, 1873.

As these cases turn entirely on the evidence, no principle of law being involved, any further report than that contained in the decision would be useless.

Warren Akin ; A. P. Wofford, for plaintiffs in error.

A. T. Hackett, Solicitor General, by Peeples & Howell, for the State.

*514Warner, Chief Justice.

The defendants, Joshua Earp and George Earp, were jointly indicted for the offense of burglary in the day-time. Tliey^ were tried separately and both found guilty by the jury. A motion was made for a new trial in both cases, which was overruled by the Court, and the defendants excepted. Both cases were argued together here. In looking through the record in each case, we are clearly of the opinion there is no evidence which would have authorized the jury, under the law, to find the defendants guilty of the offense with which they were charged. They may have been guilty, but they were not *proved*to have been so, and therefore the verdict in both cases was contrary to law. The law does not allow any one to be convicted of any offense merely on a *suspicion*of their guilt. It would be a just reproach to the judicial tribunals of the State, and to the administration of the laws thereof, to allow a conviction to stand on the evidence contained in the record before us.

Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed in both cases.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50499

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Grace Hope York, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:23-CR-39-1

______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Grace Hope York has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

York has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 8, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50499 Document: 00517059836 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/08/2024
No. 23-50499

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-50499 Document: 00517059836 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/08/2024
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DANIEL HEMINGER,

Appellant,

v.

BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1964

[March 7, 2018]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE14019610.

Jeffrey M. Liggio and Geoff S. Stahl of Liggio Law, West Palm Beach, 

Robert C. Gindel, Jr. of Robert C. Gindel Jr., P.A., Boynton Beach, and 

Adam Richardson of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, for 

appellant.

William S. Isenberg and Jonathan L. Blackmore of Phelan Hallinan 

Diamond & Jones, PLLC, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Davenport v. Dimitrijevic, 857 So. 2d 957, 963 (Fla. 4th 

DCA 2003); Shienvold v. Habie, 627 So. 2d 1203, 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 

1993).

WARNER, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10671]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              AFTER RECESS

  The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the 
Speaker pro tempore (Mr. Holden) at 5 o'clock and 5 minutes p.m.

                          ____________________
```
(LOGO)


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 2801
One Independent Drive
Jacksonville, Florida
32202-5034

Telephone: (904) 665-1400
Facsimile: (904) 355-9104

INDEPENDENT  ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION ABOUT COMPLIANCE WITH
UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation and subsidiaries:

We have examined  management's  assertion about Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation
and  subsidiaries'  (the  "Company")   compliance  with  the  minimum  servicing
standards  identified in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform
Single Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the fiscal
year ended December 25, 1998, included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management  is  responsible  for the  Company's  compliance  with those  minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation and
subsidiaries complied with the aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of
and for the  fiscal  year  ended  December  25,  1998 is fairly  stated,  in all
material respects.

Deloitte & Touche

February 22, 1999

(LOGO)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Forms S-8 Nos. 333-40446 and 333-40450) pertaining to the Interliant, Inc.
1998 Stock Option and Employee Stock Purchase plans and (Forms S-3 Nos. 333-
37156 and 333-38228) pertaining to the convertible subordinated notes and
related registration rights of Interliant, Inc. of our report dated February
16, 2001 (except for Note 15 and the third through fifth paragraphs of Note 1,
as to which the date is April 16, 2001) with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Interliant, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
April 16, 2001
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2202]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         HONORING JAY CEE PAGE

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. SAM GRAVES

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, October 2, 2008

  Mr. GRAVES. Madam Speaker, I proudly pause to recognize Jay Cee Page 
of Kansas City, Missouri. Jay is a very special young man who has 
exemplified the finest qualities of citizenship and leadership by 
taking an active part in the Boy Scouts of America, Troop 1740, and 
earning the most prestigious award of Eagle Scout.
  Jay has been very active with his troop, participating in many Scout 
activities. Over the many years Jay has been involved with Scouting, he 
has not only earned numerous merit badges, but also the respect of his 
family, peers, and community.
  Madam Speaker, I proudly ask you to join me in commending Jay Cee 
Page for his accomplishments with the Boy Scouts of America and for his 
efforts put forth in achieving the highest distinction of Eagle Scout.

                          ____________________
```
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Eric Albright [ealbright@environcorp.com]

Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 10:12 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: Shane Young

Subject: SPI-Anderson call tomorrow

Shaheerah:

I know you had a list of topics you wanted to cover, but I can provide some information on the items you raised this

morning.

The existing boiler will be decommissioned and dismantled after the new cogeneration unit is up and running. While the

new unit is going through shakedown and commissioning, there will be periods when both units are operating, but the

new unit will not be generating electricity during those periods.

There are eight existing kilns at the facility, and the cogeneration unit project does not include any new kilns.

There is painting associated with routine maintenance operations, and construction of the cogeneration unit will include

painting, but there are no ongoing painting operations at the facility.

I think it will save time if we have Shane Young, the manager of the Anderson facility, on our call tomorrow at about 2:15

PM PDT. I can set up a call

‐ in number for us all to use, or I can conference Shane in after you call me. Let me know what

works best for you.

Thanks.

Eric

Eric Albright, PE | Senior Manager

ENVIRON International Corporation

19020 33 rd Avenue W, Suite 310 | Lynnwood, WA 98036

T: +1 425 412 1804 | F: +1 425 412 1840 | M: +1 206 909 0591

ealbright@environcorp.com



### This message contains information that may be confid ential, privileged or otherwise protected by law from

disclosure. It is intended for the excl usive use of the Addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized

agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclo se to anyone the message or any

information contained within. If you have received this message in error, please c ontact the sender by electronic

reply to email@environcorp.com and immediately delete al l copies of the message.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 515 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-136, K2025-134.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-25268 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 07 /31 /2014 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR
– 2013
- 0602 **SUBJECT:** Moffat County Commissioner Meeting held on 07/29 /2014 **SUMMARY :**  On July 29, 2014, Shaun McGrath, EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator, and Callie Videtich, Acting Assistant Regional Administrator, met with Moffat County Commissioner, John Kinkaid , and Craig City Councilmember, Ray Beck , to discuss Region 8’s participation in a meeting on the proposed Clean Power Plan for E xisting Power Plants to be held by the County Commissioners in September in Craig, Colorado. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES:** Shaun McG rath, EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator Callie Videtich, Acting Assistant Regional Administrator Moffat County Commissioner, John Kinkaid Craig City Councilmember, Ray Beck
#### JOSEPH LIVINGSTON v. COLUMBUS DUNLAP.

*Evidence*— Trial—Appeal—Assignment *of Ei'ror*

1. The admission of immaterial evidence will not be sufficient to warrant a new trial, unless from its nature it is calculated to and may have misled the jury.

*%*It is incumbent on the appellant to show that by the reception of immaterial evidence he was probably prejudiced.

This is a civil action, which was tried before *Graves,*/., at Spring Term, 1886, of Henderson Superior Court.

This is an action brought to recover the land described in the complaint. The pleadings raised issues of fact. On the trial the plaintiff introduced evidence for the purpose *269of proving a continuous chain of title consisting of numerous *mesne*conveyances from the State to them. In the course of the examination of a witness for this purpose, the defendant objected to the admission of certain testimony in respect to the location of a particular grant from the State, which the plaintiff proposed to elicit from him. The Court overruled the objection, admitted the evidence and the defendant excepted.

The Court in its instructions to the jury told them that the plaintiff had failed to show a perfect chain of title; that a material *mesne*conveyance was missing; that the location of the grant referred to was immaterial, and that the evidence of the witness objected to, was likewise immaterial, and the plaintiffs could only rely upon the evidence that went to prove a continuous possession of the land up to known and visible lines and boundaries under color of title for seven years, &c. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, and the defendant appealed to this Court.

*Messrs. S. V. Pickens*(by brief) and *Theo. F. Davidson,*for . the plaintiff.

No counsel for the defendant.

MerrimoN, J.,

(after stating the case). The Court instructed the jury explicitly that the evidence objected to and the grant to which it referred, turned out in the course of the trial to be immaterial, and that the plaintiffs could recover, if at all, upon an entirely different kind of title, of which there was appropriate evidence. The jury were thus cautioned against the immaterial evidence. It did not in its nature and application tend to mislead them, nor did it in fact so far as appears. If it did so in fact, the appellant should have made this appear in some way.

The admission of immaterial evidence is not always ground for a new trial, even when objected to; it is so only when it *270is such as may from its nature or application, or both, have the effect to mislead the jury. If it is simply immaterial, ■the party complaining must show that he probably suffered prejudice by it. It wmuld be trifling with serious matters to set aside verdicts and grant new trials because of the admission of evidence on the trial that could not or did not prejudice the losing party. It may be added, however, that the Courts should, as far as practicable, exclude such evidence.

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Zaso, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 644]

*1024Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (James R. Harvey, J.), rendered August 21, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of marihuana in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant contends that the term of imprisonment imposed on his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Penal Law § 265.02 (8) should have been directed to run concurrently to the term of imprisonment imposed on his conviction of criminal possession of marihuana in the second degree (§ 221.25). We reject that contention. Although the items from which those charges arose were recovered from defendant’s apartment at the same time during the execution of a search warrant, the actus reus of each offense is the possession of a certain illegal item, respectively, a large capacity ammunition feeding device and marihuana. Thus, the underlying acts “are entirely separate and distinct” *(People v Bryant,*92 NY2d 216, 231 [1998]; *see People v Ramirez,*89 NY2d 444, 451 [1996]; *People v Laureano,*87 NY2d 640, 643 [1996]), and consecutive terms of imprisonment therefore were properly imposed *(cf.*Penal Law § 70.25 [2]). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Present—Green, J.P., Pine, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation in Amendment No. 3 to Registration
Statement No. 33-62779 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 25, 1997,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alexander's, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1996 and our report dated February 11, 1997 appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kings Plaza Shopping Center and Marina for
the year ended December 31, 1996.
 
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
February 27, 1997
 
                                       61
EXIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sector 10, Inc.; on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Pericles DeAvila, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |     |                            
| | --- | ---------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Pericles DeAvila       
| |     | Pericles DeAvila           
| |     | Principal Executive Officer



November 20, 2009