alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of Capital Environmental Resource Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David Sutherland-Yoest, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

    (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

<Table>
<S>    <C>                                               <C>
/s/ DAVID SUTHERLAND-YOEST
-------------------------------
Name:  David Sutherland-Yoest
Title: Chief Executive Officer
</Table>

November 28, 2003

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
----

----

| 1. | the                quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Falcon Ridge Development Inc.,                for the                year ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Falcon                Ridge Development Inc.,. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                   |                                    |
|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                        |                                   |
|                                   |                              |                               |
| Dated February                14, 2007 |                                   | /s/ Fred                M. Montano |
|                                        | Fred                M. Montano,        |
|                                        | Chief                Executive Officer |

----

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Network-1 Technologies,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of Able Energy Inc. (the "Company"), on Form
10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), Daniel L. Johnston, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





November
17,
2007




/s/ Daniel L.
      JohnstonDaniel L.
      JohnstonChief Financial
      Officer







[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Able Energy Inc. and will be retained by Able Energy Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: F AA- 2009-1222 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM153AD

MPD D621U400-9 ---4/08 MPD D621 U400-9 --- 3/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained Inthe Supplemental AD Docket
MAY BEVIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 LindAve. Sw., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 DURING THE HOURS OF: 9a.m. and 3pm., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
EX-13.2 5 eh1300930_ex1302.htm EXHIBIT 13.2

**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Enacted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

 

Agave Silver Corp. (the “Company”) is filingwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March31, 2013 (the “Report”).

 

I, Sherri Odribege, Interim Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)  the Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

February 12, 2015
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form l0-Q for the period ended July 4, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J.T. Malugen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  August 13, 2004

 

 
| /s/  J. T. Malugen            |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  J. T. Malugen          |
| Its:  Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Movie Gallery, Inc. and will be retainedby Movie Gallery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>



Exhibit 99.2
Deloitte & Touche LLP
                    Suite 1200                  Telephone: (714) 436-7100
                    695 Town Center Drive       Facsimile: (714) 436-7200
                    Costa Mesa, California  92626-1924


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

We have examined management's assertion about First Alliance Mortgage Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, included in the
accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for First Alliance
Mortgage Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about First Alliance Mortgage Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on First Alliance Mortgage Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that First Alliance Mortgage Company
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all respects.



\s\ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, CA
January 25, 1999
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

SURYA KOTHA, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; 

AND THE HONORABLE WILLIAM D. 

KEPHART, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

RAVI MANTENA; RAJU MANTENA; 

MNR EDUCATIONAL TRUST; 

DWIBASHYAM MEHAR 

SUBRAHMANYAM; V.S. RAJU; AND 

CHANDRASEKHARAM SEKHAR 

TATAPUDY, 

Real Parties in Interest. 

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging 

a district court order granting a motion for a continuance and a stay. 

Having considered the arguments raised in the petition, we are not 

persuaded that the district court arbitrarily or capriciously abused its 

discretion in granting the motion so as to warrant our extraordinary and 

discretionary intervention. NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second 

Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. 

Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); 

No. 69303 

FILE 

JAN I 4 2016 

TRACIE K. UNDEIVAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

ey 

OEPU CLERK 

SUPREME COURT 

Of 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e> -0 l2SS 
Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 

849, 851, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

/ frea,s; 

Hardesty 

-26titethSaitta 

Pitlett 

Pickering 

cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge 

Muckleroy Lunt, LLC 

Sabharwal & Finkel LLC 

Marquis Aurbach Coffing 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

, J. 

, J. 

(0) L947A em,
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD P. DAGRES,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. COUNTRYWIDE BANK, N.A., succeeded by merger with BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP; et al.,
Defendants

- Appellees. No. 14

- 56799
D.C. No. 2:14

- cv - 01339

- CAS

- CW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 18, 2017 **

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Richard P. Dagres appeals pro se from the district court’ s judgment dismissing his federal and state law claims arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district cour t’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 26 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 56799

dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and we may affirm on any basis supported by th e record. Thompson v.
Paul , 547 F.3d 1055, 1058

- 59 (9th Cir. 2008). We a ffirm.
The district cou rt properly dismissed Dagres’ securitization related state law claims because California law does not permit Dagres to bring a preemptive suit to challenge defendants’ authority to foreclosure

. See Gomes v. Countrywide Home

Loan s , Inc. , 192 Cal. Rptr. 3d 819, 823

- 24 (Ct. App. 2011 ). Each of Dagres’
arguments for why defendants lack authority to foreclose have been rejected by the
California courts. See, e.g. , Saterbak v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , 199 Cal. Rptr. 3d 790, 79 5

- 9 6 (Ct. App. 2016) (borrowers lack standing to challenge assignments of loans into a securitized trust); Siliga v. Mortg. Elect. Registration Syst. , Inc. , 161 Cal. Rptr. 3d 500 , 506 (Ct. App. 2013) (“California courts have held that a trustor who agreed und er the term s of the deed of trust that [ electronic database provider Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.] , as the lender’s nominee, has the authority to exercise all of the rights and interests of the
lender

. . . is precluded from maintaining a cause of action based on the allegation that MERS has no authority to exercise those rights.” ), abrogated in part by Yvanova v. New Century Mortg. Corp. , 365 P.3d 845 (Cal. 2016). We do not consider arguments not specifically and distinctly raised and3 14

- 56799

arg ued in the opening brief, or raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86312-86313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25159]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL RIGHTS COLD CASE RECORDS REVIEW BOARD

[Agency Docket Number: CRCCRRB-2025-0003-N]


Notice of Formal Determination on Records Release

AGENCY: Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board received 227 
pages of records from the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA) related to a civil rights cold case incident to which the Review 
Board assigned the unique identifier 2024-003-014. On October 18, 2024, 
the Review Board determined that 226 pages in full and 1 page in part 
should be publicly disclosed in the Civil Rights Cold Case Records 
Collection. The Review Board approved the one postponement proposed by 
NARA. By issuing this notice, the Review Board complies with section 
7(c)(4) of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 
that requires the Review Board to publish in the Federal Register its 
determinations on the disclosure or postponement of records in the 
Collection no more than 14 days after the date of its decision.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephannie Oriabure, Chief of Staff, 
Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board, 1800 F Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20405, (771) 221-0014, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fd94939b92bd9e9291999e9c8e988f989e928f998ed39a928b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7beb9b1b897b4b8bbb3b4b6a4b2a5b2b4b8a5b3a4f9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

[[Page 86313]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Postponement         Review board
      Incident identifier             identifier            decision
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2024-003-014..................  2024-NARA-03-0001.....  Approve.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2107 (Pub. L. 115-426, 132 Stat. 5489).

    Dated: October 24, 2024.
Stephannie Oriabure,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2024-25159 Filed 10-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 67820-SY-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### JOAB MEARS v. JERVIS SPEIGHT.

No judgment can he taken, upon a ca. sa. bond, if the debtor appears and answers when called at the Court to which he is' bound, although his surety does not surrender him.

But on an appeal to the Superior Court, the debtor is still bound to appear, when called in the regular course of the Court, and failing to do so, the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment on the appeal bond.

MotioN for JUDGMENT upon the bond of an insolvent debtor, tried before Pebson, J., at the Spring Term, 1857, of Robeson Superior Court.

The defendant was arrested under a ca. sa., issued by a single justice of the peace, at the instance of the plaintiff, and gave bond for his appearance at the next term of the County Court of Robeson County, to take the oath under the insolvent debtors’s act. At the term to which he was bound to appear, he was called and answered, but not having given notice, and his surety failing to surrender him, judgment was rendered on the bond against the principal and his sureties, from which the defendant appealed to the Superior Court.

In the Superior Court, the cause being regularly reached, the debtor, Jervis Speight, was solemnly called, and, on failing to appear, judgment was rendered against his sureties to the appeal bond, from which they appealed to this Court.

*421
      *Beitch,*for plaintiff.

*Troy,*for defendant.

Battle, J.

There is not tbe slightest doubt that the judgment rendered in the County Court against the defendant and the surety on his appearance bond, was erroneous. Though the defendant had not given the notice of his intention to take the benefit of the insolvent oath, yet, as he appeared, no judgment could be rendered against him and his surety in the bond, because the surety was responsible only for his appearance. *Watson*v. *Willis,*2 Ire. Rep. 17. This judgment, however, was vacated by the appeal from it to the Superior Court. The cause was then, by the appeal, properly constituted in the Superior Court, and was so treated by both parties. In that Court, it was as much the duty of the defendant to take the necessary steps for qualifying himself to take the benefit of the insolvent’s oath, as it had been while the case was in the County Court. Among other things which it was his ¡duty to do, he was bound to appear whenever he was called, in the regular business of the Court, and to take the oath, or, upon good cause shown, get a continuance of his suit until the nest term. This is clearly shown by the case of *Wilkings*v. Bingham, 3 Ire. Rep. 86. This, the defendant, upon being solemnly called, failed to do, whereupon the plaintiff became entitled to judgment against him and the sureties to his appeal bond, for the amount of the debt, interest and costs. *Wilkings*v. Bingham, *ubi supra ; Williams*v. Floyd, 5 Ire. Rep. 649.

PER CueiaM. Judgment affirmed.
06/28/201 1 15:3 6 1202457779 9 WICKS-FA X PAG E 02/0 3

UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO NADMINISTRATIO N I nth e Matte r

of: EMPTR K ATR1-INES , INC . FA ADOCKE T CP09NM000 9 FAACas e No . 2007NM70n i 5 5 DM S No . FAA-2009-058 6

NOTIC EO FAPPEARANC E Pleas e ente r

th e appearanc e o f

Glen nP . Wick s an dRoncevert D , Almon da s attorney s o f recor dfo r Empir e Airlines , Inc . i nth e above-reference daction . Servic e o f all paper s b y U.S . Mail , expedite dcourie r

service , an dpersona l delivery shoul db e addresse da s follows : Glen nP . Wick s Roncever t

D . Almon d Th e Wick s Group , PLL C 121 5 17 * Street , N W Sumne r Annex , FourthFloo r Wjishinglon , D C 2003 6 Tel : (202 ) 457-779 0 Fax : (202 ) 457-779 9 Date dthi s 20 * day o f

June , 2011 . 

### Wp^ac^i::^ ^ ^ice*'^f^AJjxion d Th e Wick s Group , PLL C 121 5 17 * Stree t

N W Sumne r Annex , Fourt hFloo r Washington , D C 2003 6 Tel : (202 ) 457-779 0 Fax : (202 ) 457-779 9 Cuuivititfur

Empir e Airlines , Inc .06/20/201 1 15:3 6 1202457779 9 WICKS-FA X PAG E 03/0 3

CERTIFICAT EOV SERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t th e foregoin g documen t

ha s bee nsen t

vi afacsiuul e an dcxpedile d courie r servic e to ; Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearm g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Fax:(202)493-514 2 Mr . Jame s A . Barry , Senio r Attorne y Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 - Tel : (202 ) 267-819 8 Fax:(202)267-510 6 Mr . Scott Morris , Attorne y Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l (ANM-7 ) 160 1 Lin dAve. , S.W . Renton , W A9805 7 Tel : (425 ) 227-141 7 Fax:(425)227-110 7 Two (2 ) copie s an dorigina l

On e (1 ) cop y

On e (1 ) cop y

Date dthi s 20 * day o f

June , 2011 .

D . Alnjom T l e Wicks Group , PLL C 121 5 17 * Street , N W Sumner Annex , FourthFloo r Washington , D C 2003 6 Tel : (202 ) 457-779 0 Fax : (202 ) 457-779 9 Counse l fo r

Empir e Airlines , Inc ,
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1015

In re: THADDEUS D. WILLIAMS

Debtor,

-----------------------------------

SANDRA S. SPAIN, a/k/a Sandra S. Spain Sprouse; TREADEGAR 

CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THADDEUS D. WILLIAMS,

Defendant – Appellant,

and

MICHELE B. WILLIAMS,

Defendant,

BRUCE H. MATSON,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,

District Judge. (3:13-cv-00709-JAG)

Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014
2

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thaddeus D. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Thaddeus D. Williams appeals from the district court’s 

order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order 

granting him a discharge in bankruptcy. The district court 

dismissed Williams’ appeal after he failed to timely file an 

appeal brief and designation of the record. See Fed. R. Bankr. 

P. 8006. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s 

order and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. 

See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a); In re SPR Corp., 45 F.3d 70, 74 

(4th Cir. 1995); In re Serra Builders, Inc., 970 F.2d 1309, 1311 

(4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s order. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED