alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### W. A. GIBSON v. H. C. BARBER and wife.

[For syllabus, see same case in 100 N. C., p. 193.]

Civil actioN, tried before *Merrimon, J.,*at February Term, 1889, of the Superior. Court of RICHMOND.

*Mr. C. W. Tillett,*for the plaintiff.

No counsel for the defendants.

Shepherd, J.

When this case was last before the Court (100 N. C., 192), it was held “that so much of the proceeding as looks to an adjustment of controversies arising out of the administration of the whole trust estate, by the mortgagees, and beyond that which belongs to the land, must be declared to be erroneous, and is reversed.” “The cause,” says the Court, “will proceed in the Court below in accordance with the l¿w as declared in this opinion.” It was also held that the plaintiff, by his purchase, took the legal estate, subject to the right of the defendant to redeem, and that the judgment should have directed that, if the indebtedness was not paid by a day certain, the land should be sold.

We have examined the judgment of his Plonor, and it seems to be fully sustained by the principles stated in the opinion. No error was pointed out by counsel, and we are unable to find any. The judgment is affirmed.

No error. " Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001065803
<NAME>                        ORANGE PRODUCTIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Feb-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Mar-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Feb-28-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         12,288
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,288
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,160
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       206
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,288
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,549)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,549)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         186,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,368,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                (1,226,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  8,470,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,457,000
<PP&E>                                       4,313,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,228,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,302,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,455,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,549,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,302,000
<SALES>                                      1,533,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,533,000
<CGS>                                        1,526,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,207,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,235,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,235,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $(.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $(.48)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.10


January 25, 2001



Board of Directors

Southern Security Bank Corporation

1000 Brickell Avenue, Suite 900

Miami, Florida 33131


and


Board of Directors

Southern Security Bank

3475 Sheridan Street

Hollywood, Florida 33021


Dear Board Members:


        In accordance with section 256.11(a) of the Rules Regarding Delegation of
Authority of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (12 CFR
265.11(a)(15)), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has authorized the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta to terminate the Written Agreements that the
organization is currently operating under.  This letter is to notify you that, effective
immediately, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta has terminated its interest in the
April 13, 1995 Written Agreement with Southern Security Bank Corporation and in the
November 13, 1998 Written Agreement with Southern Security Bank.  We are pleased with
the actions taken by the boards and management to return the organization to a
satisfactory condition.  We look forward to further successful development of the bank.


	 	Very truly yours,

		Zane R. Kelley
Vice President



	cc:	Cheryl Paret, Enforcement Assistant, Board of Governors

Linda Townsend, Chief, State of Florida
*February*9, *1943.*

#### Schulz, Respondent, vs. Jentges, Appellant.

For the appellant: *L. A. Willenson*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *John J. Sullivan*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on' February 9, 1943.
# AMERICAN AIRLINES

September 21, 2010

Linda Lundell U.S. Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: American Airlines, U.S.-Mexico Transborder Routes (AA* on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air) (DOT-OST-2010-0222)__________________________

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

American Airlines, Inc. has completed its poll of the parties served with our application of September 20, 2010 to amend our exemption in the captioned docket. We are seeking exemption authority to serve Sacramento-Guadalajara and San Jose-Guadalajara by codesharing (AA*) on flights operated by
Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air.

We have received non-objections from each of the parties we served. We request expedited approval.

Respectfully submitted,

Carl B. Nelson Associate General Counsel American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17 th Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5647 carl.nelson@aa.com

cc: Docket Branch Esta Rosenberg Service list**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the following persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com scott.mcclain@delta.com bill@mietuslaw.com sametta.c.barnett@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com bkeiner@crowell.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com mrosia@crowell.com mcmillin@woa.com bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com eskraft@jamhoff.com jeffrey.manley@united.com dpdean@jamhoff.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com dkirstein@yklaw.com robert.land@jetblue.com jyoung@yklaw.com msinick@ssd.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov cdonley@ssd.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil gbleopard@fedex.com john.allen@faa.gov dvaughan@kelleydrye.com byerlyjr@state.gov kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com recohn@hhlaw.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com lhalloway@crowell.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com efaberman@wileyrein.com lachter@starpower.net mroller@rollerbauer.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com howard.kass@usairways.com rpommer@atlasair.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com gmurphy@crowell.com sophy.chen@hklaw.com russell.bailey@alpa.org david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com esahr@eckertseamons.com

_______________________________ CARL B. NELSON

September 21, 2010
AFH Holding II, Inc. 10-Q





Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFH Holding II, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, I, Amir F. Heshmatpour, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.           Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 12, 2010





/s/ Amir F. HeshmatpourAmir F. HeshmatpourPresident (Principal Executive Officer)








/s/ Amir F. HeshmatpourAmir F. Heshmatpour(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### La Crosse Trust Company, Administrator, Appellant, vs. Gantert and another, Respondents.

*646For the appellant: *Gordon, Law, Brody & Johns*of La Crosse.

For the respondents: *Hale & Skemp*of La Crosse.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-115579, 333-59636,
333-41348, 333-41288 and 333,140220), Registration Statement No. 333-116379 on Form S-4, Registration Statement
No. 333-143510 on Form S-3ASR and Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-104124, 333-37994,
333-69578 and 333-86606), of our reports dated February 28, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Janus Capital Group Inc. (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption on January 1, 2007 of the Financial Accounting Standard Board's Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes), and the effectiveness of Janus Capital Group Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Janus Capital Group Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 28, 2008

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 99.C

                       CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Tang Yuxiang, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Yantai Dahua Holdings
Company Limited (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      The annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d); and

      The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Dated:  June 30, 2004


                                         /s/ Tang Yuxiang
                                         ----------------
                                         Tang Yuxiang
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                       46
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 369

To provide States with the authority to permit certain employers of domestic

workers to make annual wage reports.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. CLELAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To provide States with the authority to permit certain

employers of domestic workers to make annual wage reports.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR STATE TO PERMIT AN4 NUAL WAGE REPORTS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1137(a)(3) of the Social

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–7(a)(3)) is amended by

7 inserting before the semicolon the following: ‘‘, and except

8 that in the case of wage reports with respect to domestic

9 service employment, a State may permit employers (as so

10 defined) that make returns with respect to such service
2

•S 369 IS

1 on a calendar year basis pursuant to section 3510 of the

2 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make such reports on

3 an annual basis’’.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

5 subsection (a) shall apply to wage reports required to be

6 submitted on and after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SouthFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Joe K. McArthur, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Janice Browning, Controller and Treasurer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|    |  |                         | 
|--- |  | ----------------------- | 
|By: |  | /s/ Joe K. McArthur     | 
|    |  |                         | 
|    |  | Joe K. McArthur         | 
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer | 
|    |  | August 14, 2002         | 
|    |  |                         | 
|    |  | /s/ Janice Browning     | 
|    |  |                         | 
|    |  | Janice Browning         | 
|    |  | Controller, Treasurer   | 
|    |  | August 14, 2002         |
#### MARY PINNER *vs.*NANCY PINNER *et al.*

Upon the question of the *bona Jides*of a deed, alleged to be in fraud of a contemplated marriage, what the husband, the grantor, said in favor of the deed, even before the marriage, is not admissible : because the wife claims by act of law paramount to the husband.

This was a petition for dower, tried before his Honor Judge Bailey, at the Special Term of the Superior Court, held for the county of Buncombe, July 1855.

This case was before the Court at the August Term, 1853, (Busbee’s Beport 475,) and the same issue of fact was submitted as at the former term, to wit, “ whether the husband of the petitioner, William Pinner, was seized of the premises?” On this trial, as on the former, it was alleged by the defendant, (his daughter Nancy) that previously to his intermarriage with the petitioner, the said William Pinner had made to her a conveyance for the land in question. A deed was produced by her, bearing date in 1827, which was attácked on the ground, that it was in fraud of the petitioner’s right to dower, and defendants’ counsel offered to prove by the- witness, that *399previously to "William Pinner’s intermarriage with the petitioner, he told the witness he had made his daughter a deed for the land. This testimony was ruled out by the Gourt, for which the defendant excepted.

A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, and an appeal taken by the defendant to this Court.

*ffl. W. Woodfin*and Bynum, for plaintiff.

*J. W.*Woodfin, for defendant.

Nash, 0. J.

The case as now presented to ris differs from the one formerly here, in one particular only. The witness,. Panning, upon that occasion, stated that the declaration of William Pinner, as to his gift of the land to the defendant, was made about a month before his death, and consequently after his marriage with the plaintiff. See the case in Busbee 475. In the present case the defendant offered to prove the same declarations made before his marriage, which were ruled out by the Gourt. In the former case, this Court decided that the evidence of Banning, of declarations of the husband made at the time of the delivery of the deed, was competent as part of the *res gestae,*but that no declarations then made of what he had done at a prior period, as to the making of a title to the defendants were admissible. The reason assigned was, that the widow claims her right of dower, not under her husband, but under the law. If the reason assigned by the Court for its decision be correct, then it makes no difference at what time the husband’s declarations were made as to the prior delivery ; they cannot affect his widow, as she does not claim under him. Her claim to dower is above and beyond him ; and so sedulously does the law guard her right, that it makes void all conveyances made by the husband with the fraudulent intent to deprive her of her dower, and places her dower beyond the reach of her husband’s creditors.

Pee CueiaM. His Honor committed no error in rejecting the evidence. Judgment affirmed and this opinion will be certified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  DERIVED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          1,436
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          6,291
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    21,146
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            325
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              325
<LOANS>                                        47,891
<ALLOWANCE>                                       204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 81,464
<DEPOSITS>                                     68,666
<SHORT-TERM>                                    3,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               911
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           51
<OTHER-SE>                                      8,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 81,464
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 3,171
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               1,166
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                4,337
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              2,175
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                182
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           1,980
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (17)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 1,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   613
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        613
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      384
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   8.06
<LOANS-NON>                                         0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  200
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      44
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 203
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              203
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        


</TABLE>
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Dri v e , C o coa, FL 32926 ( 321)

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.co m September 26, 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation D ocket O perations West Building Ground Floor, Room W 1 2

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Section 333 Petition for Exemption , Exemption No.

12363 pursuant to Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R.

Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Powers Flight Group, LLC f iled for a Petition f or E xemption/Rulemaking, Pursuant to Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 , for the purposes of

c ontrolled, low

- risk, precision commercial agriculture

- related services over certain areas

of the United States

.

The docket number for this peti tion is Docket No. FAA

– 2016

– 4932

. The original petition lists the original 200 foot altitude limitation instead of the current 400 foot altitude

limitation. UASolutions Group, Inc. , on behalf of Powers Flight Group, LLC , hereby
requests to amend Docket No. FAA

– 2016

– 4932 from the 200 foot altitude restriction

listed in the original petition to the current accepted 400 foot altitude restriction

.

As this is an amendment asking for only a correction of an incorrect a ltitude to comply with current regulations, UASolutions Group, Inc., on behalf of Powers Flight Group, LLC respectfully submits that good cause exists so tha t notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an amendment

.UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Dri v e , C o coa, FL 32926 ( 321)

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.co m
[HUMATECH, INC. LETTERHEAD]

October 22, 2001

Brandon D. Williams
735 Red Rock Canyon Drive
Katy, TX 77450

Dear Sir,

As agreed, the Board of Directors of HumaTech, Inc. has fully authorized the
issuance of 8,000 shares of unrestricted common stock in HumaTech, Inc. This is
issued to you for work performed for the benefit of HumaTech, Inc.

Thank you,

/s/ David Williams                     /s/ Brandon D. Williams
__________________                     _____________________________
David Williams                         Accepted, Brandon D. Williams
President, CEO
HumaTech, Inc.