alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,    as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Envirokare Tech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, George E. Kazantzis, President (President and Principal Financial Officer) and Louis F. Savelli (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

That the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate on this 29th day of March 2007.

                                                                                                             /s/ George E. Kazantzis                                                                                                             Name: George E. Kazantzis                                                                                                             Title: President (Principal Financial Officer)                                                                                                            /s/ Louis F. Savelli                                                                                                             Name: Louis F. Savelli                                                                                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer (Chief Executive Officer)
#### Perkins (Frank), Respondent, vs. Western Casualty & Surety Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Chas. H. Avery*of AntigO1.

For the respondent: *Lewis J. Charles*of Medford.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Scottish Re
Group Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elizabeth A. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Elizabeth A. Murphy
-----------------------
Elizabeth A. Murphy

Chief Financial Officer

April 11, 2005

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 15-1172

_____________

LAURENCE KAPLAN, on behalf of himself,

individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated

v.

SAINT PETER’S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM; 

RONALD C. RAK; SUSAN BALLESTERO, an individual; 

GARRICK STOLDT, an individual;

JOHN and JANE DOES 1–20

Saint Peter’s Healthcare System, Ronald C. 

Rak, Susan Ballestero, Garrick Stoldt,

 Appellants

________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civil Action No. 3-13-cv-02941)

District Judge: Honorable Michael A. Shipp

________________

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

on July 7, 2017

Submitted on Remand July 7, 2017

Present: McKEE, AMBRO, and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges

_____________________________ ORDER __________________________________

By opinion and judgment dated June 5, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States 

ordered the judgment of this Court entered December 29, 2015 be reversed. Advocate 

Health Care Network, et al. v. Stapleton, et al., __ U.S. __, 137 S.Ct. 1652 (2017).

In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court, the opinion and judgment of this 

Court are hereby vacated. It is further ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the judgment 
of the District Court dated March 31, 2014 is hereby reversed. Costs are taxed in favor of 

the Appellants.

By the Court,

s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

ATTEST:

s/Marcia M. Waldron,

Clerk

Dated: July 13, 2017
S. 559

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 300 East 8th Street in Austin, Texas,

as the ‘‘J.J. ‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal Building located at 300 East 8th Street in Austin,

Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘J.J. ‘Jake’ Pickle

Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘J.J.

‘Jake’ Pickle Federal Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with  the Annual  Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VIII,  Inc.
(the "Company") on  Form  10-K  for  the  period   ending   June 30,  2004
(the  "Report"),  I,   Michael R. Quinn,  Principal  Executive  Officer  and
Principal Financial Officer of the  Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.




/s/ Michael R. Quinn
-----------------------
Michael R. Quinn
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
November 12, 2004
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

FG SRC, LLC, Appellant

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATIO N, Appellee

______________________

2020

- 1993

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018

- 01604.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J AY P. K ESAN

, DiMuroGinsberg

, PC

- DGKey IP Group

, Tysons Corner , VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by C ECIL E. K EY ; A LFONSO C HAN

, A RI R AFILSON , Shore Chan DePumpo LLP, Dallas, TX.

C ONSTANTINE L. T RELA

, J R

., Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by R ICHARD A LAN C EDEROTH ; S COTT B ORDER

, T YLER J. D OMINO

, J OSEPH A. M ICALLEF , Washington, DC.

______________________ Case: 20-1993 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 05/06/2021T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge

, L OURIE and

O’M ALLEY

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 6, 2021

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 20-1993 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 05/06/2021
CONSENT OF AUTHOR





To:

BC Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

Securities & Exchange Commission



I, Curtis Freeman, do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory authorities referred to above, of the technical report titled EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE UNION BAY PROJECT, KETCHIKAN MINING DISTRICT, ALASKA and to the written disclosure of the Technical Report and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the written disclosure of Freegold Ventures Limited to be filed with regulatory agencies.



I also certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical Report or that the written disclosures of Freegold Ventures Limited contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in the Technical Report.
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

        Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Retalix Ltd. (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I, Barry Shaked, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge:  

        1.                     theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section           13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  

        2.                     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in           all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the           Company.  

Date: March 21, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7516 

WILLIAM M. FINN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT SPIKER; SERGEANT HICKS; LIEUTENANT

MOORE; CAPTAIN D. FLIPPEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-05-542-3)

Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 2, 2006

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Finn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William M. Finn appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for

failure to comply with a court order regarding filing fees. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Finn v. Spiker, No. CA-05-542-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 1147

_____________________________ F ELIX L. C UEVAS

- R ODRIGUEZ , Petitioner ,

v. S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Man damus

— Original Jurisdiction

.
April 13, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.
M AKAR , W INOKUR , and W INSOR , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________

Felix L. Cuevas

- Rodriguez, pro se , Petitioner

.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 370 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 370

To designate the North/South Center as the Dante B. Fascell North-South 
                                Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 1999

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the North/South Center as the Dante B. Fascell North-South 
                                Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NORTH/SOUTH CENTER AS THE DANTE B. FASCELL 
              NORTH-SOUTH CENTER.

    Section 208 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Years 1992 and 1993 (22 U.S.C. 2075) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Dante B. 
Fascell North-South Center Act of 1991'';
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by amending the subsection heading to read as 
                follows: ``Dante B. Fascell North-South Center.--''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``known as the North/South 
                Center,'' and inserting ``which shall be known and 
                designated as the Dante B. Fascell North-South 
                Center,''; and
            (3) in subsection (d), by striking ``North/South Center'' 
        and inserting ``Dante B. Fascell North-South Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    (a) Center.--Any reference in any other provision of law to the 
educational institution in Florida known as the North/South Center 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dante B. Fascell North-South 
Center''.
    (b) Short Title.--Any reference in any other provision of law to 
the North/South Center Act of 1991 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Dante B. Fascell North-South Center Act of 1991''.
                                 <all>
```
*June 15, 1943.*

#### Estate of Hickox: Estate of Burch, Appellant, vs. Hickox, Executrix, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Hill, Miller & Hill*of Baraboo.

For the respondent: Charlton H. James of Dodgeville.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
<Page>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.9

                             GAS GATHERING AGREEMENT

         THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), made and entered into this 1st day of
July, 1992 with an effective date retroactive to October 1, 1991, is executed
by and between ENERGAS PIPELINE COMPANY, INC. ("Pipeline"), an Oklahoma
Corporation, and A T GAS GATHERING SYSTEMS, INC. ("A T"), an Oklahoma
Corporation.

         WHEREAS, "A T", a wholly owned subsidiary of Energas Resources Inc.,
a British Columbia, Canada Corporation, is the owner of the gathering system
pipeline situated in Sections 25, 26 and 34, T1N, R14E in Atoka County,
Oklahoma and gathering the gas from the following wells: the Gamble 1-25,
Wyrick 1-26, Wyrick 2-26 and the Rose 1-34, and;

         WHEREAS, "Pipeline" is the gas marketer and operator of the
gathering system, gathering gas from the Gamble 1-25, Wyrick 1-26, wyrick
2-26 and Otto Rose 1-34 and delivering the gas to the COP (Central Delivery
Point) interconnecting with the Associated Natural Gas "Pine Mountain"
pipeline, and;

         NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows

1. That "A T" will receive a consideration of $0.17 per Mcf to be paid
monthly by operator within 60 days of production month, for the use of its
gathering system to transport all gas produced from above described wells to
the COP of Associated Natural Gas.

2. This agreement, from the effective date, is to remain in effect for a
primary term of 5 years and then to renew year to year thereafter unless
changed or superseded in writing by the parties herein.


OWNER:

A T GAS GATHERING SYSTEMS, INC

By  /s/ George G. Shaw
    ------------------------------
    President


OPERATOR:

ENERGAS PIPELINE COMPANY

By  /s/ George G. Shaw
    ------------------------------
    President
1

 The Honorable James B. Loken stepped down as Chief Judge for the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the close of business on March 31,

2010. He has been succeeded by the Honorable William Jay Riley. 

2

 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-2578

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of Minnesota.

Jesus Cortez, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 8, 2010

 Filed: April 6, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN,1

 Chief Judge, GRUENDER and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM. 

Jesus Medina Cortez appeals the below-guidelines sentence the district court2

imposed after he pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute five or more

kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846.
-2-

After calculating a guidelines range of 97 to 120 months, the court granted a

government motion for a downward departure based on substantial assistance, and

sentenced Cortez to 60 months’ imprisonment. Under the plea agreement, Cortez

waived his right to appeal unless the sentence exceeded 135 months. 

Cortez challenges neither the validity nor the scope of his waiver. He also does

not allege that imposition of the sentence is a miscarriage of justice. He instead argues

his sentence is unreasonable. This court will not, however, review his reasonableness

claim. See United States v. Sisco, 576 F.3d 791, 795-96 (8th Cir. 2009) (a waiver of

appeal is enforceable where the appeal is within the scope of the waiver, the waiver

was knowing and voluntary, and enforcement would not result in a miscarriage of

justice). 

Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, this court

affirms the judgment of the district court.

______________________________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 24, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 474 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-78, K2025-76.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24598 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 3C


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                        TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                            MONUMENT GALLERIES, INC.

     Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Business Corporation Act,
Monument Galleries, Inc., a Colorado corporation, adopts the following Articles
of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:


     FIRST: The name of the corporation is Monument Galleries, Inc.

     SECOND: The following amendment was adopted by the directors of the
corporation and approved by the shareholders of the corporation, effective as of
April 28, 2000, in the manner prescribed by the Colorado Business Corporation
Act:


     RESOLVED: The name of this corporation is changed to Real Estate
Opportunities, Inc.


     THIRD: The amendment above will have no effect on the exchange,
reclassification, or cancellation of issued shares.




DATED: April 28, 2000



                                            /s/ F. Jeffrey Krupka
                                            ---------------------------
                                            F. Jeffrey Krupka, President
Message Information

Date 07/20/2011 06:24 PM From Denise Robertson <pclibertygroup@gmail.com > To ray.lahooddot.gov ; LisaP Jackson/OC/USEPA/US©EPA Urgent - Citizens against new fuel standards

Jul y 20, 2011 The Honorable Ray l.a 1100(1 Secretar y of the Department of Iransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue. SF Washington, D.C. 20590 The I loriorable lisa Jackson Administrator of the hnvironmenta! Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Dear Secretary I a1 lood and Administrator Jackson, ihe Preble Count y Liberty Group strongly- believes in the power of limited government to encourage economic growth, protect individual recdom and best serve the needs of the American people. As such, we cannot support EPA and N I-LISA proposals to radicall y increase the present vehicle fuel econom ystandards. We Ibel this would he an overreach of government power. a poorly thought-out plan that would harm our economy and den y consumers their right to choose. Increasing already stringent national ftiel economy standards would raise prices. unnecessarily inhibiting the sale of American-made vehicles. This would limit employment in the domestic auto industr y and give foreign manufacturers a leg up in the U.S. market. Forcing consumers to pay as much as $10.000 more for a new car or truck would price many of them out of the market completely. that would keep older, less fuel-efficient vehicles on the road and stymie the overall fuel economy gains this policy seeks to achieve.
We (IC) not need a smaller auto industr y , courtesy of federal government interference in free commerce. Agencies such as tile [WA and NI ITSA have a lob to do, hut they must not let their efforts to accomplish their goals override the basic welfare of theAmerican people. Puffing fhmi Iv breadwinners out ol a job or making it impossible for

small business owners to aliord the vehicles they need to run their operations as the proposed fuel econom y standards could do - would benefit no one, V/c respectfbll y ask that you abandon this plan. Sincerely, Denise Robertson and Preble Count yLiberty Group

OEX Processing Information Processed Date: Processed By P0 Office Category: