alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 516 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-137, K2025-135.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25280 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 99(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Airborne, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl D. Donaway, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as enacted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Carl D. Donaway                                                             
|Carl D. Donaway Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board March 14, 2003
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Theundersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K to whichthis certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordancewith clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shallnot be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.
| Date: March 15, 2005 |   |                                                                      |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | /s/ THOMAS E. D’AMBRA, PH.D.                                         |   |
|                      | Name:  | Thomas E. D’Ambra, Ph.D.                                             |   |
|                      | Title: | *Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive  Officer and Director* |   |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 10.64**

 

**SECOND AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE RETENTION AGREEMENT**

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE RETENTION AGREEMENT (this “Second Amendment”) is made as of the 1st day of January, 2007, by and between ALEXANDER’S INC., a Delaware corporation (“Alexander’s”), having an address at 210 Route 4 East, Paramus, New Jersey 07652, (sometimes hereinafter referred to as “Owner”), and VORNADO REALTY, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, having an office at 210 Route 4 East, Paramus, New Jersey 07652 (“Vornado”).

**R E C I T A L S**

A.       Alexander’s and Vornado's predecessors-in-interest, Vornado, Inc. and Keen Consultants Inc., have heretofore entered into that certain Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated  July 20, 1992, as amended by that certain Amendment to Real Estate Retention Agreement by and between Alexander's and Vornado dated as of July 3, 2002 (the “Retention Agreement”).

B.    Whereas, Owner and Vornado desire to amend the Retention Agreement as set forth below.

**NOW THEREFORE,**in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto, Owner and Vornado hereby agree as follows:

1.     The following amendments to the Retention Agreement shall be effective from and after the date hereof:

|   | a. | In the fourth line of the opening paragraph, the following language is hereby deleted, "that are debtors in pending chapter 11 cases (each such debtor being a "Debtor" and collectively, "Debtors")," and the following language is substituted therefor, "Owner"; and the word "Owner" shall be substituted for the words "Debtor" or "Debtors" throughout the Retention Agreement. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | Article II.C.1.(a) is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefor: |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

"When Owner disposes of an Asset, whether individually or as part of a package or as part of the disposition of Owner's business or a portion thereof, or as part of a plan of reorganization, by sale, assignment, lease, sublet or otherwise to a third party, or by assignment of a leasehold to the landlord or by termination of a leasehold for which Owner receives consideration (any of the foregoing, an "Asset Transaction"); or if in lieu of a disposition of the Assets, one or more third parties acquires control of 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 756 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 756

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 1999

                Referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide adversely affected crop producers with additional time to 
 make fully informed risk management decisions for the 1999 crop year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROP INSURANCE OPTIONS FOR PRODUCERS WHO APPLIED FOR CROP 
              REVENUE COVERAGE PLUS.

    (a) Eligible Producers.--This section applies with respect to a 
producer eligible for insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) who applied for the supplemental crop insurance 
endorsement known as Crop Revenue Coverage PLUS (referred to in this 
section as ``CRCPLUS'') for the 1999 crop year for a spring planted 
agricultural commodity.
    (b) Additional Period for Obtaining or Transferring Coverage.--
Notwithstanding the sales closing date for obtaining crop insurance 
coverage established under section 508(f)(2) of the Federal Crop 
Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1508(f)(2)) and notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation shall provide 
a 14-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, but not 
to extend beyond April 12, 1999, during which a producer described in 
subsection (a) may--
            (1) with respect to a federally reinsured policy, obtain 
        from any approved insurance provider a level of coverage for 
        the agricultural commodity for which the producer applied for 
        the CRCPLUS endorsement that is equivalent to or less than the 
        level of federally reinsured coverage that the producer applied 
        for from the insurance provider that offered the CRCPLUS 
        endorsement; and
            (2) transfer to any approved insurance provider any 
        federally reinsured coverage provided for other agricultural 
        commodities of the producer by the same insurance provider that 
        offered the CRCPLUS endorsement, as determined by the 
        Corporation.

            Passed the Senate March 25, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.27

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Amendment No. 1 dated as of July 27, 2000 amends the Employment
Agreement dated September 28, 1998 by and between R.H. Donnelley Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Judith A. Norton (the "Executive")
(the "Existing Agreement", and as amended, the "Agreement").

         WHEREAS, the Company considers it essential and in the best interests
of its shareholders to foster the continued employment of its senior management
personnel, and the Executive is an important member of the Company's senior
management; and

         WHEREAS, the Company wishes to clarify its intent with respect to
benefits to be provided to the Executive in certain events following a Change in
Control.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that the Existing Agreement is hereby
amended as follows:

         1. Paragraph 1 of the Existing Agreement is amended by inserting the
following sentence at the end thereof:

            "Notwithstanding the foregoing, no person (including the Company and
            any successor thereto) shall be permitted to give notice of such
            intention within two years following a Change in Control, as
            hereinafter defined."

         2. Paragraph 8 of the Existing Agreement is amended by deleting the
last sentence thereof and replacing such sentence with the following:

            "The provisions of this Section 8 (and any related provisions of
            Section 10) shall survive any non-renewal of this Agreement by the
            Company pursuant to Section 1."

         3. Subsection (c) of Paragraph 8 of the Existing Agreement is amended
by deleting ", as hereinafter defined," from the first sentence thereof.

         4. This Amendment No. 1 shall be conditioned upon the receipt by each
party hereto from the other a counterpart hereof signed by such other party or
facsimile or other written confirmation that such other party has signed a
counterpart hereof.

         5. This Amendment No. 1 shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

<PAGE>   2

         6. This Amendment No. 1 may be signed in counterparts, each of which
shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and
hereto were upon the same instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment No. 1
as of the day and year first above written.


                               Judith A. Norton

                              /s/ Judith A. Norton
                              --------------------


                              R.H. DONNELLEY CORPORATION


                              By: /s/ Frank R. Noonan
                                 --------------------
                                      Frank R. Noonan
                                      Chairman and CEO

                                       2
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Robert P. Capps, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mitcham Industries, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Robert P. Capps   Robert P. Capps  Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDecember 12, 2006
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 159 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10308-S10309]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      RECOGNIZING MS. KELSEY LANDT

 Mr. BUNNING. Mr. President, today I recognize Ms. Kelsey Landt 
of Paducah, KY, who is a premed senior at the University of Kentucky at 
13 years old. Before her teenage years Kelsey participated in spinal 
cord injury research at the University of Kentucky, and while at the 
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, she utilized 
transcranial magnetic stimulation to understand reward processing. At 
the age of 10, she presented her work at the 2005 Community College 
Conference for Student Research in Madisonville, KY, and this year, she

[[Page S10309]]

participated in a summer internship program at the National Institutes 
of Health in Maryland. At an age when many children look to hangout at 
a local mall, Kelsey has already built a resume that mirrors those 
students who were born more than a decade before her.
  In addition to her academic activities, Kelsey is involved in 
community life. She is presently the youngest account holder at the 
Community Foundation of West Kentucky where she raises money for 
medical and research based charitable organizations. She is a regular 
at the local Salvation Army and makes time to volunteer at a local 
children's hospital in Lexington, KY.
  After earning a bachelor's degree in biology at the University of 
Kentucky next spring, Kelsey will begin her postbaccalaureate position 
at the National Institutes of Health and then hopes to attend medical 
school. Like most Kentuckians, I look forward to seeing all that she 
will accomplish as she works toward her goal of becoming a medical 
scientist.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Capital
Environmental Resource Inc. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald L.
Rubin, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                  
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
    U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                      
| | ---------------------
| | /s/ RONALD L. RUBIN  
| |                      
| | Name: Ronald L. Rubin

| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2004

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### C. McKinnis, Appellant, v. T. J. Estes *et al.,*Appellees.

Conveyance of Real Estate: mortgage : payment : evidence.

*Appeal from, Keokule District Court.*— Hon. W. R. Lewis, Judge.

Monday, October 20, 1890.

Action to foreclose a mortgage. Upon a trial on the merits, the plaintiff’s petition was dismissed. He now appeals to this court,

*Smith & Talley,*for appellant.

*E. S. Samson,*for appellees.

Beck, J.

I. The mortgage was executed to secure a debt of fifty dollars by Mary A. Estes. It covers twelve acres of ground. The mortgagor, who subsequently died, devised the land for life to defend ant, J. H. Estes, a son, and directed in her will that, upon his death the property should be sold, and the'proceeds divided among her other children and grandchildren. The defendants in their answer allege, that the mortgage was paid by J. H. Estes to plaintiff, the assignee thereof.

*750II. We think this defense is established by the preponderance of the evidence. The defendant, J. H. Estes, testifies that he conveyed the land to plaintiff in payment of an account held by plaintiff for medical attendance and the satisfaction of the mortgage, which plaintiff agreed to acquire from the mortgagee, and then cancel it. The defendant’s evidence is contradicted by plaintiff, who testifies that he was to discharge the bill for medical attendance for the land, and give nothing more. He is not corroborated. Defendant is corroborated by the evidence of a witness who testifies that plaintiff stated to him, soon after the transaction, that he was to pay off the mortgage, and discharge the account for medical attendance in payment for the land. The fact that the consideration named in the deed about equals the amount due on the mortgage also corroborates defendant.

III. Plaintiffs insists that the contract set up by defendant was made on Sunday, and, therefore, cannot be enforced. This position is not sustained by the evidence. Negotiations may have been had on Sunday, but the contract was agreed to and consummated on another day.

It is our opinion that the decree of the district court ought to be -AFFIRMED.