alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                    2,733
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               412
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                              56,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         62,931
<PP&E>                                                   53,249
<DEPRECIATION>                                           19,810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          118,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    34,517
<BONDS>                                                   4,655
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                     91
<OTHER-SE>                                               75,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            118,643
<SALES>                                                 199,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        199,673
<CGS>                                                   106,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           106,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         77,283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        2,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          13,920
<INCOME-TAX>                                              5,413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       8,507
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                              8,507
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.91
        

</TABLE>
<pre>

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that:

(i) the Annual Report  on Form 10-KSB/A of  the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2006 , as amended, (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a)  or Section 15(d),  as applicable, of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                      /s/   Inti Shaikh
                      ---------------------------
                      Inti Shaikh
                      CEO
                     (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  January 24, 2008



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley
Act of 2002 the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that:

(i) the Annual Report  on Form 10-KSB/A of  the Company for the  year
ended December 31, 2006, as amended,  (the Report) fully complies with  the
requirements of Section 13(a)  or Section 15(d),  as applicable, of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                        VOTE POWER CORPORATION
                        /S/ Inti Shaikh
                        ----------------------------
                        Inti Shaikh
                        Secretary/Treasurer
                        (Principal Financial Officer)


Dated:  January 24, 2008
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**


**Pursuant
      to 18 United States Code Section 1350**








The
      undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 of Nanobac Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated (the
      "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.







/s/
                John D Stanton-------------------------------------------John
                D StantonChief
                Executive OfficerMay
                18, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nanobac Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated and will be retained by it and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





30
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          28,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,734,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,742,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,916,000
<PP&E>                                       7,398,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,029,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,623,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,271,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,241,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,623,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,111,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,610,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             171,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (670,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (670,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (670,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.67)


</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 16356 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:16

- cv - 81251

- RLR

CONRAD SCARRY , Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Distr ict of Florida

________________________ ( October 3, 2017 ) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-16356 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 1 of 22 Conrad Scarry appeals the District Court’s order dismissing his initial complaint for failing to state a claim for relief and its order denying for futility his motion for leave to amend the complaint. The initial complaint alleged that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) did not adequately respond to Korte &
Wortman’ s request for information under 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(d)(2)(i)(A) because
it failed t o provide the telephone number of the entity that owns Scarry’s loan. The proposed amended complaint repeated this claim and added that Wells Fargo also violated 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(d)(2)(i)(B) by not adequately responding to Scarry’s request for inform ation related to loss

- mitigation efforts and invoices related to property inspections , violated 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(d)(1)(i) by failing to investigate the missing phone number, and violated 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(f)(2) by failing to send a notification of non compliance. Loan servicers are not required to provide a loan owner’s tele phone number under 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(d)(2)(i)(A)

. Mej i a v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , — F. App ’x

— , 2017 WL 3396563 (11th Cir. Aug. 8, 2017). Nor must they furnish information unrelated to “servicing,” like the loss

- mitigation and property

inspection information requested here. See Hudgins v. Seterus, Inc. , 192 F. Supp. 3d 1343, 1347

– 53 (S.D. Fl a . 2016). Accordingly, Wells Fargo had no duty to investigate the information’s absence or send a non compliance notification. AFFIRMED. Case: 16-16356 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 2 of 2
steam

_ record - Re:

Gree tings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. gov> To: "Wood, William H" <wwood@rrienergy.com> Date: 7/9/2010 12:49 PM Sub j ect: Re: Attachments: 20100708161314499.pdf Pa g e 1 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
LORONIX CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CASH 
FLOWS FROM ITS 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,250,065<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,180,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,142
<INVENTORY>                                  2,000,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,025,758
<PP&E>                                       5,325,087
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,526,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,774,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,778,362
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,663
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,755,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,774,371
<SALES>                                      6,154,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,154,818
<CGS>                                        3,326,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,361,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (83,401)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,140,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (184,866)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,955,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,955,689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY HAS TWO OUTSTANDING LETTERS OF CREDIT COLLATERALIZED BY 
A COMBINATION OF CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT AND CASH TOTALING APPROXIMATELY
$100,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.6

SUBSIDIARIES OF VERIDIEN CORPORATION

      A)    Rost Inc. - incorporated in Florida (dormant)

      B)    Rost Medical Development, Inc. - incorporated in Delaware (dormant)

      C)    Marquit Manufacturing Specialties, Inc. - incorporated in Delaware
            (dormant)

      D)    Veridien.com Inc. - incorporated in Delaware (dormant)

      E)    Norpak (U.S.), Inc. - incorporated in Delaware

      F)    The SunSwipe Corporation, L.L.C. - incorporated in Delaware

      G)    Communications Gear, Inc. - incorporated in Delaware (dormant)

The above-named subsidiaries which are operational conduct business solely under
the listed names.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 506

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the

provisions which allow nonrefundable personal credits to be fully allowed

against regular tax liability.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. KERREY, Ms.

LANDRIEU, and Mr. COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently

extend the provisions which allow nonrefundable personal

credits to be fully allowed against regular tax liability.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NONREFUNDABLE PERSONAL CREDITS FULLY

4 ALLOWED AGAINST REGULAR TAX LIABILITY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 26(a) of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation based on amount

7 of tax) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(a) LIMITATION BASED ON AMOUNT OF TAX.—The

9 aggregate amount of credits allowed by this subpart for
2

•S 506 IS

1 the taxable year shall not exceed the taxpayer’s regular

2 tax liability for the taxable year.’’

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 24(d) of

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking

5 paragraph (2) and by redesignating paragraph (3) as

6 paragraph (2).

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

9 December 31, 1998.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 208 (Monday, October 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85565-85566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24936]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD


Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Merit Systems Protection Board announces the appointment 
of the members of its Senior Executive Service Performance Review 
Board. This notice supersedes all previous notices regarding the 
Performance Review Board membership.

DATES: These appointments are effective October 28, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pervis Lee, Director of Human 
Resources, Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20419; telephone: (771) 210-1492; or email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d0d180f0b140e531118183d100e0d1f531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="49392c3b3f203a67252c2c09243a392b672e263f">[email protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 85566]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) is 
publishing the names of the current members of its Performance Review 
Board (PRB) as required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) and 5 CFR 430.311. Laura 
M. Albornoz, MSPB, serves as Chair of the PRB. Susan M. Swafford, MSPB; 
Gina K. Grippando, MSPB; and David S. Eddy III, Federal Labor Relations 
Authority, serve as members of the PRB.

Gina K. Grippando,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-24936 Filed 10-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### THE SINGER MANUFACTURING CO. v. G. C. BARRETT.

*Appeal Bond.*

1. Where the record stated “plaintiff appealed. Notice waived. Bond filed, ” which was signed by the Judge, it is a sufficient waiver in writing of a formal justification of the bond, and the appeal will not be dismissed because the sureties do not justify in double the amount.

2. Where it appears in the record that the judgment appealed from was not entered until after the expiration of the term, and it also appears underthe signature of the Judge, that the undertaking on appeal was filed, it will be presumed that the Court, by consent, allowed the bond to be filed without regard to time.

3. This rule only applies when the entries are made by the Judge. No such presumption arises when they are made by the Clerk.

*(Gruber*v. *The R. M. Go.,*92 N. C., 1, cited and approved. *State*v. *Wagner,*91 N. C., 521, cited and distinguished).

MotioN hy the defendant to dismiss an appeal, heard at the February term, 1886, of the Supreme Court.

The facts appear in the opinion.

No counsel for the plaintiff.

*Mr. C. M. Busbee,*for the defendant.

Merrimon, J.

The appellee moved to dismiss this appeal, upon the grounds, first, that the undertaking upon appeal was not justified in double the sum of money specified therein, and, secondly, that the undertaking was not given within ten days next after the term of the court at which the judgment was granted.

The first ground cannot be sustained, because in the case settled upon appeal, it is stated, that “from the judgment, plaintiff appealed, — notice waived. *Bond filed,”*and this is signed by the Judge. The implication from the statement is, nothing appearing to the contrary, that the court accepted the undertaking without objection from the appellee, who, it is presumed, was pre*220sent in person or by counsel. Such an entry is treated as a sufficient waiver in writing of a strict and formal justification. *Gruber*v. *Rail Road Co.,*92 N. C., 1.

And for the like reason, the second ground is without force. It seems that the judgment appealed from, was not entered until after the term, and about the 4th of December, 1885. It must be taken that this was by consent, and the Court by the like consent, allowed the undertaking, without regard to its date or time of filing it, to be filed.

This case is different from that of *State*v. *Wagner,*91 N. C., 521. In that case, the entry held to be insufficient, was made by the Clerk of the Court. Here the Judge states that the bond was filed, and hence the presumption of waiver as to the time.

The motion to dismiss the appeal cannot be allowed. The case must stand for argument upon the merits in its order, at the next term.

*Motion denied.*
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND 1996
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                          1997          1996
                                                       --------      --------
Net income                                             $  6,718      $  3,188
Interest expense on convertible
  subordinated notes                                         35            44
                                                       --------      --------
Net income applicable to common
  stockholders                                         $  6,753      $  3,232
                                                       --------      --------
                                                       --------      --------
Weighted average number of common
  and common equivalent shares                           14,338        10,838

Dilutive effect of outstanding stock
  options and warrants after application
  of the treasury stock method                              230            71

Dilutive effect of convertible subordinated
  notes assuming conversion                                 409           824
                                                       --------      --------
Common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding                                     14,977        11,733
                                                       --------      --------
                                                       --------      --------
Net income per common and
  common equivalent share (1)                          $   0.45      $   0.28
                                                       --------      --------
                                                       --------      --------

(1)  The calculation of net income per common and common equivalent share 
     for the three month periods ended March 31, 1997 and 1996 are the same 
     on a primary and fully diluted basis.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the registrant's financial statements as of and for the period ended January 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                        686,107
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                               8,897,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                  397,000
<INVENTORY>                                 1,119,234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           11,393,827 
<PP&E>                                     10,255,773
<DEPRECIATION>                              6,514,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             19,243,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       9,665,071
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    2,066,231        
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,139,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               19,243,260
<SALES>                                    13,145,526 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           26,800,558
<CGS>                                       2,128,824         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              11,796,149 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           11,984,910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               23,462
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             93,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               802,648
<INCOME-TAX>                                  256,035
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           546,613
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  546,613
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .14
        

</TABLE>