alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
data request 

BELL, CHUCK 

to: 

Jordan Page 

03/02/2010 08:36 AM 

Cc: 

Jack Faulk, "WAGNER, CYNDI" 

Show Details 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Jordan, I am providing pesticide data from the IDEM data base in reference to the data request made by Jack 

Faulk via the Waterpests Mailing List on February 4, 2010. IDEM does not have a formal pesticide monitoring 

program that looks at cause and effect relationships of application and concentration in the water column, 

however we have conducted some surveys that may furnish information pertinent to your request. 

 

I have attached a number of files that contain data and supporting information. The file "IndividualProjects" 

contains data that represents surveys that were conducted on various streams in the state on a limited basis, one 

or two sampling events on each site. The file "FixedStationProject" contains data that has been collected at a set 

number of sites on a monthly basis for the past several years. The Fixed Station sites are part of the IDEM 

monitoring network on surface water that evaluates adherence to water quality standards and establishes trends 

of water quality parameters throughout the state. Neither of these data sets have received formal treatment in a 

written report.

 

The file "PesticideProject" contains data from a 5-year project that selected a set number of sites within a 

watershed and them sampled weekly during the pesticide application and growing seasons for corn and soybeans 

in Indiana. The entire state was covered in the 5-year cycle. The years 1997, 1998 and 1999 were summarized 

in reports but the project manager left the employment of the state before the final two reports were completed. I 

have attached the three completed reports.

 

I have attached a total of 7 files, some of which are rather large. If you have any trouble receiving them or have 

any questions about the data please do not hesitate to call or get in touch by email.

 

The proper citation for using the data is Bell, Charles M., February 25, 2010. [Personal 

Communication]. Located at: Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), Assessment 

Information Management System (AIMS) Database, Indianapolis, Indiana. 

 

Charles Bell

Senior Environmental Manager

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Office of Water Quality

Assessment Branch/Surveys Section

Tel 317-308-3203

cbell@idem.in.gov

 

 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web0930.htm 5/11/2010
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). SS/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J O S E D E J E S U S M U N O Z B U Z O ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 72937 A ge nc yN os . A 095- 200- 527

A 095- 200- 528

ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e D e J e s us M unoz B uz o and P a s c ua l aD i a z V e r a , nat i ve s and c i t i z e ns of M exi co, pet i t i on pro se f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) or de rde ny i ng the i rm ot i on t o r e ope n r e m ova lpr oc e e di ngs . W e have j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED JAN 11 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSS S/ Res ea r ch 07- 72937 2 u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , an dr e v ie w d e n o v o c la im s o f du e p r o c e s s v io latio n s . I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 3 2 1 F .3 d8 8 9 , 8 9 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e ope n a s unt i m e l ybe c aus e the m ot i on w a s f i l e d m or e than 21 m onths a f t e rthe B I A ’s M ay3 1 , 2 0 0 5 , o r d e rd is m is s in g th e u n d e r ly in g ap p e a l, se e 8 C. F. R. § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) , an dp e titio n e r s f a ile dto e s tab lis h g r o u n d s f o re qu itab le to llin g , se e I tu rr ib a rr ia , 3 2 1 F .3 da t 8 9 7 ( e qu itab le to llin g av a ilab le w h e r e “p e titio n e ris prevent ed fr om fi l i ng because of dec ept i on , fr aud, or error, as l on g as the pet i t i on er a c ts w ith du e d ilig e n c e ” ) ; se e al so D ela Cruz v . Mukasey , 5 3 2 F .3 d9 4 6 , 9 4 9 ( 9 th C i r . 2008) ( pe rc ur i am ) ( pe ndi ng pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w doe s nott ol lt i m e l i m i tf or f ilin g m o tio n to r e o p e n w ith B I A ) . P e titio n e r s ’ c o n te n tio n th at th e d e n ia l o f th e ir m o t i o n t o reo p en v i o l at eddu e p ro cess th erefo re fai l s. Se e La ta v . I NS , 204 F . 3d 1 2 4 1 , 1 2 4 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( r e qu ir in g e rr o rto p r e v a il o n du e p r o c e s s c la im ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1998                SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1998                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1999                MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                    1,066,091                  1,066,091
<SECURITIES>                                      0                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                               413,913                    413,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                 54,721                     54,721
<INVENTORY>                                       0                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          2,004,031                  2,004,031
<PP&E>                                      395,974                    395,974
<DEPRECIATION>                              195,057                    195,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           10,996,508                 10,996,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     8,378,846                  8,378,846
<BONDS>                                           0                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                          0
<PREFERRED>                                       0                          0
<COMMON>                                        210                        210
<OTHER-SE>                                2,596,680                  2,596,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             10,996,508                 10,996,508
<SALES>                                           0                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          2,034,869                    900,724
<CGS>                                       411,288                    193,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             3,060,193                  1,285,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          214,781                    111,560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,645,702)                  (617,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (71,793)                   (58,545)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,578,218)                   592,768
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                          0
<CHANGES>                                         0                          0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,578,218)                  (592,768)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.08)                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.08)                     (0.03)



</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00397-CR

Tarrance Shon Forister, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 17-0568-K26, THE HONORABLE DONNA GAYLE KING, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant Tarrance Shon Forister has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The 

motion is signed by both appellant and his attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 24, 2020

Do Not Publish
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated December 14, 2007,with respect to the 2007 consolidated financial statements and schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in the Annual Report of Concur Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for theyear ended September 30, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Concur Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-3 (Amendment No. 1 to File No. 333-135557) and onForms S-8 (File Nos. 333-141925, 333-133094, 333-121278, 333-111523, 333-91146, 333-68590, 333-31190, 333-90029, 333-70455). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Seattle, Washington 

December 14, 2007
EXIBIT 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sector 10, Inc.; on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Laurence A. Madison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








By: /s/ Laurence A. Madison





Name: Laurence A. Madison


Chief Financial Officer





August 20, 2012
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document DocumentMumber: Number: 

V£25fll-K- (I) -39 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:56 AM Sheet 225 of 325 
P.2 

/A\ R 

II-K-(I)-39 

INDUSTRIAL BOILER NSPS IMPACT ANALYSIS SECOND ROUND 

TEST CASES IFCAM MODEL RESULTS (Cont'd). 

EEA, Inc. 

November 15, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-39
#### Wolfinger, Guardian *ad litem,*Respondent, vs. Bruex and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Edward J. Byrne*of Appleton, attorney, and *Lehner & Lehner*and *Adolph P. Lehner,*all of Oconto Falls of counsel.

For the respondent: *Benton, Bosser, Becker & Parnell,*attorneys, and *David L. Fulton*of counsel, all of Appleton.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARKONA,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Alan Rudd, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1)       The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Alan Rudd
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       6,423,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  400,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   151,000
<INVENTORY>                                     15,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,791,000
<PP&E>                                         903,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 488,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,168,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          929,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,000
<COMMON>                                        44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,189,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,168,000
<SALES>                                        569,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,831,000
<CGS>                                          699,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,489,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,829,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               136,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,154,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,777,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,777,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,777,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.56)
        

</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 617

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

under the medicare program of insulin pumps as items of durable medical

equipment.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15, 1999

Ms. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage under the medicare program of insulin

pumps as items of durable medical equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Insulin Pump

5 Coverage Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF INSULIN PUMPS UNDER MEDICARE.

7 (a) INCLUSION AS ITEM OF DURABLE MEDICAL

8 EQUIPMENT.—Section 1861(n) of the Social Security Act

9 (42 U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended by inserting before the
2

•S 617 IS

1 semicolon the following: ‘‘, and includes insulin infusion

2 pumps (as defined in subsection (uu)) prescribed by the

3 physician of an individual with Type I diabetes who is ex4 periencing severe swings of high and low blood glucose lev5 els and has successfully completed a training program that

6 meets standards established by the Secretary or who has

7 used such a pump without interruption for at least 18

8 months immediately before enrollment under part B’’.

9 (b) DEFINITION OF INSULIN INFUSION PUMP.—Sec10 tion 1861 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x)

11 is amended by adding at the end the following:

12 ‘‘Insulin Infusion Pump

13 ‘‘(uu) The term ‘insulin infusion pump’ means an in14 fusion pump, approved by the Federal Food and Drug Ad15 ministration, that provides for the computerized delivery

16 of insulin for individuals with diabetes in lieu of multiple

17 daily manual insulin injections.’’.

18 (c) PAYMENT FOR SUPPLIES RELATING TO INFUSION

19 PUMPS.—Section 1834(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act

20 (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(2)(A)) is amended—

21 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end;

22 (2) in clause (iii), by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end;

23 and

24 (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following:
3

•S 617 IS

1 ‘‘(iv) which is an accessory used in

2 conjunction with an insulin infusion pump

3 (as defined in section 1861(uu)),’’.

4 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 this section shall apply with respect to items of durable

6 medical equipment furnished under title XVIII of the So7 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) on or after the

8 date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 FEBRUARY 25, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-13315

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-00315-CR-38-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO DEMETRIS PETTY,

a.k.a. Tony,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

_________________________

(February 25, 2010)

Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

L. Dean Best and Kathy L. Anderson, counsel for Antonio Demetris Petty in
this direct criminal appeal, have filed a motion to withdraw from further

representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the

entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable

issues of merit, counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Petty’s

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>
                           NETWORK PLUS CORP.

                         COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

               RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES

<CAPTION>
                                          Year Ended December 31,
                              ---------------------------------------------
                                1994     1995     1996     1997      1998
                              -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
<S>                            <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>       <C>
EARNINGS
Net income (loss) before
 income taxes                  $3,019   $4,007   $1,475  $(3,149)  $(5,289)
Combined fixed charges            135      207      542      801     3,527
                               -------  -------  ------- --------  -------- 
     Total Earnings            $3,154   $4,214   $2,014  $(2,348)  $(1,762)

COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
Interest expense                    2       40      313      557     1,101
Preferred stock dividends
 and accretion of issuance
 costs and discounts               -        -        -        -      2,005
Interest portion of
 operating lease rentals          133      167      229      244       421
                               -------  -------  ------- --------  --------
     Total Combined Fixed      $  135   $  207   $  542  $   801   $ 3,527
      Charges

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
 COMBINED FIXED CHARGES          23.4x    20.4x     3.7x    (2.9)x    (0.5)x

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-44551, 33-56289, 33-64317, 333-46615,
333-59790, 333-65822, 333-75539, 333-75541, 333-75543, 333-91613) of R.H.
Donnelley Corporation of our report dated February 8, 2002 relating to the R.H.
Donnelley Corporation consolidated financial statements and our report dated
January 18, 2002 relating to the DonTech Partnership combined financial
statements, which appear in this Form 10-K.




/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

New York, New York
March 27, 2002





                                       61
Year GHG Change SCC 5% DC SCC 3% DC SCC 2.5% DC SCC 3% DC (95th%) SCC 5% DC SCC 3% DC SCC 2.5% DC SCC 3% DC (95th%) in tons of CO2- e/MMBTU (2010$/ton) (2010$/ton) (2010$/ton) (2010$/ton) (2010$gallon) (2010$gallon) (2010$gallon) (2010$gallon)

2013 0.09719697 $5.55 $23.82 $38.62 $72.52 -$0.54 -$2.31 -$3.75 -$7.05 2014 (0.00941173) $5.77 $24.33 $39.30 $74.17 $0.05 $0.23 $0.37 $0.70 2015 (0.00941173) $5.99 $24.84 $39.99 $75.82 $0.06 $0.23 $0.38 $0.71 2016 (0.00941173) $6.21 $25.35 $40.68 $77.46 $0.06 $0.24 $0.38 $0.73 2017 (0.00941173) $6.43 $25.86 $41.37 $79.11 $0.06 $0.24 $0.39 $0.74 2018 (0.00941173) $6.64 $26.37 $42.05 $80.75 $0.06 $0.25 $0.40 $0.76 2019 (0.00941129) $6.86 $26.88 $42.74 $82.40 $0.06 $0.25 $0.40 $0.78 2020 (0.00941129) $7.08 $27.39 $43.43 $84.04 $0.07 $0.26 $0.41 $0.79 2021 (0.00941129) $7.39 $28.06 $44.30 $86.05 $0.07 $0.26 $0.42 $0.81 2022 (0.00941129) $7.70 $28.73 $45.17 $88.06 $0.07 $0.27 $0.43 $0.83 2023 (0.00941178) $8.00 $29.40 $46.04 $90.07 $0.08 $0.28 $0.43 $0.85 2024 (0.00941178) $8.31 $30.08 $46.91 $92.08 $0.08 $0.28 $0.44 $0.87 2025 (0.00941178) $8.62 $30.75 $47.78 $94.09 $0.08 $0.29 $0.45 $0.89 2026 (0.00941178) $8.92 $31.42 $48.64 $96.10 $0.08 $0.30 $0.46 $0.90 2027 (0.00941178) $9.23 $32.09 $49.51 $98.11 $0.09 $0.30 $0.47 $0.92 2028 (0.00941183) $9.54 $32.76 $50.38 $100.12 $0.09 $0.31 $0.47 $0.94 2029 (0.00941183) $9.85 $33.43 $51.25 $102.13 $0.09 $0.31 $0.48 $0.96 2030 (0.00941183) $10.15 $34.11 $52.12 $104.14 $0.10 $0.32 $0.49 $0.98 2031 (0.00941183) $10.46 $34.78 $52.99 $106.15 $0.10 $0.33 $0.50 $1.00 2032 (0.00941183) $10.77 $35.45 $53.86 $108.16 $0.10 $0.33 $0.51 $1.02 2033 (0.01005801) $11.08 $36.12 $54.73 $110.17 $0.11 $0.36 $0.55 $1.11 2034 (0.01005801) $11.38 $36.79 $55.60 $112.18 $0.11 $0.37 $0.56 $1.13 2035 (0.01005801) $11.69 $37.47 $56.47 $114.19 $0.12 $0.38 $0.57 $1.15 2036 (0.01005801) $12.00 $38.14 $57.34 $116.20 $0.12 $0.38 $0.58 $1.17 2037 (0.01005801) $12.30 $38.81 $58.21 $118.21 $0.12 $0.39 $0.59 $1.19 2038 (0.01005822) $12.61 $39.48 $59.08 $120.22 $0.13 $0.40 $0.59 $1.21 2039 (0.01005822) $12.92 $40.15 $59.95 $122.23 $0.13 $0.40 $0.60 $1.23 2040 (0.01005822) $13.23 $40.82 $60.82 $124.24 $0.13 $0.41 $0.61 $1.25 2041 (0.01005822) $13.54 $41.42 $61.51 $126.00 $0.14 $0.42 $0.62 $1.27 2042 (0.01005822) $13.85 $42.01 $62.19 $127.76 $0.14 $0.42 $0.63 $1.29

TOTAL: -0.1822 $2.16 $6.91 $10.41 $21.11

Annualized Average: 

# -0.0061 $0.0227 $0.1134 $0.1918 $0.3472 GHG SCC Estimates for Soybean-Based Biodiesel (2013-2042)
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2009-NM-204-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a('significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a ::;ubstantialnumber of small entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation inAlaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is

# it appropriate to include specific

, requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)