alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 8, 2016 

Sarah W. Hammond, PhD

Chaetura, LLC.

P.O. Box 200

Chatham, MS 38731

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Exemption Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations from certain parts of the FARs as mentioned below.

Chaetura, LLC seeks the requested exemptions to permit it to offer aerial data collection 

services and training for ecological, biological, and geographical purposes, including 

agricultural, infrastructure inspection, aerial mapping and surveying, archaeology, real estate, 

and disaster assessment. 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) 

and 14 CFR Part 11, Chaetura, LLC hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal 

Aviation Regulations (FAR) to allow commercial operation of a designated unmanned aerial 

system (UAS), provided such operations are conducted within the conditions outlined herein or 

as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. 

As described in the following pages, the requested exemption would permit the operation of a 

designated UAS as set forth in this document under controlled conditions in the National 

Airspace System (NAS) that would be operated safely. Approval of this exemption would 

provide services that would reduce the risk associated with manned solutions, in both flight and 

other methods of completion of the proposed services. 

The name and address of the Petitioner is as follows: 

Sarah W. Hammond, PhD

Chaetura, LLC

P.O. Box 200

Chatham, MS, 38731

479-653-1823

sarahwheeless@gmail.com
---

Exhibit 13.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Enacted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 First Energy Metals Limited (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 (the “Report”). I, Gurminder Sangha, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/Gurminder SanghaGurminder SanghaChief Executive Officer July 31, 2019


---
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.9

                                    AGREEMENT

         This Agreement is made this 18th day of October, 2001 by and among
Tender Loving Care Health Care Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Company"), Stephen Savitsky, David Savitsky and Dale R. Clift.

         Reference is made to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization, dated October 18, 2001 (the "Merger Agreement"), by and among
Company, Parent and TLC Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation.
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the
respective meanings given such terms in the Merger Agreement.

         In connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated
under the Merger Agreement, Company agrees to make, on the date the Minimum
Condition is satisfied, payment of the following amounts, less applicable
withholding taxes, in immediately available funds, to the individuals identified
below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       NAME OF PAYEE             AMOUNT
          <S>                                   <C>
          Stephen Savitsky                      $1,230,000
          David Savitsky                          $449,000
          Dale R. Clift                         $1,250,000
</TABLE>

         The undersigned parties acknowledge that, pursuant to a letter dated
the date hereof from e-MedSoft.com, a Nevada corporation ("Parent"), to Stephen
Savitsky, David Savitsky and Dale R. Clift, Parent has agreed to contribute
funds to Company upon the occurrence of the Minimum Condition in the amount of
the aggregate payments due to Stephen Savitsky, David Savitsky and Dale R. Clift
pursuant to this Agreement and otherwise guarantee the payment of such amounts
to such persons.

<PAGE>

                                      -2-

         This Agreement may be executed in one or more original or facsimile
counterparts.

                                       TENDER LOVING CARE HEALTH
                                       CARE SERVICES INC.

                                       By: /s/ Stephen Savitsky
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Stephen Savitsky, Chairman of the
                                           Board and Chief Executive Officer

Acknowledged and accepted by:

     /s/ Stephen Savitsky
   --------------------------
     Stephen Savitsky


     /s/ David Savitsky
   --------------------------
     David Savitsky


     /s/ Dale R. Clift
   --------------------------
     Dale R. Clift
<Page>

                                                                  Exhibit 4.2.1



1.  The Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of December __,
    2001 by and among Homer City OL1, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability
    Corporation, as Issuer and the Bank of New York, as Lease Indenture
    Trustee and Security Agent.

2.  The Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of December __,
    2001 by and among Homer City OL2, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability
    Corporation, as Issuer and the Bank of New York, as Lease Indenture
    Trustee and Security Agent.

3.  The Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of December __,
    2001 by and among Homer City OL3, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability
    Corporation, as Issuer and the Bank of New York, as Lease Indenture
    Trustee and Security Agent.

4.  The Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of December __,
    2001 by and among Homer City OL4, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability
    Corporation, as Issuer and the Bank of New York, as Lease Indenture
    Trustee and Security Agent.

5.  The Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of December __,
    2001 by and among Homer City OL5, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability
    Corporation, as Issuer and the Bank of New York, as Lease Indenture
    Trustee and Security Agent.

6.  The Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of December __,
    2001 by and among Homer City OL6, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability
    Corporation, as Issuer and the Bank of New York, as Lease Indenture
    Trustee and Security Agent.


7.  The Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of December __,
    2001 by and among Homer City OL7, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability
    Corporation, as Issuer and the Bank of New York, as Lease Indenture
    Trustee and Security Agent.

8.  The Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of December __,
    2001 by and among Homer City OL8, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability
    Corporation, as Issuer and the Bank of New York, as Lease Indenture
    Trustee and Security Agent.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 785 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.785

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
        For the relief of Frances Schochenmaier and Mary Hudson.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF OF FRANCES SCHOCHENMAIER.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any moneys in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Frances Schochenmaier of 
Bonesteel, South Dakota, the sum of $60,567.58 in compensation for the 
erroneous underpayment to Herman Schochenmaier, husband of Frances 
Schochenmaier, during the period from September 1945 to March 1995, of 
compensation and other benefits relating to a service-connected 
disability incurred by Herman Schochenmaier during military service in 
World War II.

SEC. 2. RELIEF OF MARY HUDSON.

    Notwithstanding section 5121(a) of title 38, United States Code, or 
any other provision of law, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall not 
recover from the estate of Wallace Hudson, formerly of Russellville, 
Alabama, or from Mary Hudson, the surviving spouse of Wallace Hudson, 
the sum of $97,253 paid to Wallace Hudson for compensation and other 
benefits relating to a service-connected disability incurred by Wallace 
Hudson during active military service in World War II, which payment 
was mailed by the Secretary to Wallace Hudson in January 2000 but was 
delivered after Wallace Hudson's death.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON FEES.

    (a) In General.--Not more than a total of 10 percent of the payment 
required by section 1 or retained under section 2 may be paid to or 
received by agents or attorneys for services rendered in connection 
with obtaining or retaining such payment, as the case may be, any 
contract to the contrary notwithstanding.
    (b) Violation.--Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be 
fined not more than $1,000.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82615-82616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAMS 
Ancillary 2025/01 Review Meeting.
    Date: November 12, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 
6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Chiguang Feng, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Extramural 
Program, Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 30892, (301) 451-7766, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8be8e3e2ecfeeae5eca5edeee5eccbe5e2e3a5ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81e2e9e8e6f4e0efe6afe7e4efe6c1efe8e9afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 82616]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 8, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-23632 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### W. F. GRUBBS v. CHARLES STEVENSON.

*Tidal*— Evidence—Impeaching *Testimony.*

In the trial of a material issue it was not competent to show by the plaintiff', on cross-examination, that at a previous trial the same issue had been found against him, for such fact could not impeach the witness nor throw light upon the pending issue, which depended upon the facts as testified to on the trial and not on what opinion the former jury had of the matter.

Civil actior, tried at August Term, 1893, of NORTHAMPTON ¡Superior Court, before *Bryan, J.,*and a jury, in which the main issue was whether the relation of landlord and tenant existed between the parties.

The plaintiff, after testifying that he had rented the land to the defendant and had made advances which lie sought *278by tlio action to collect, was asked whether on a former trial of the action the question whether he was landlord of the defendant had not been found against him, to which, after the overruling of his objection, he answered “Yes.”

There was a verdict for the defendant, and from the judgment thereon plaintiff appealed.

*Mr. E. B.*Peebles, for plaintiff (appellant).

*Mr. W IT. Day,*for defendant.

Clakk, J.:

The defendant asked the plaintiff, who was a witness in his own behalf, “if the question whether he was landlord of the defendant was not before tried in this action and found against the plaintiff,” stating that the purpose of the question was to impeach the witness. The question was admitted over the plaintiff’s objection. The witness answered yes. The plaintiff' excepted. AVe fail to see how the fact that another jury in trying the case had found this fact against the plaintiff could impeach him. Still less was it competent to throw light upon the question at issue whether the relation between the plaintiff and defendant had been that of landlord and tenant. That depended upon what was the agreement between the parties, and not upon the opinion which a jury in a former trial had formed in regard to it. It may be that if tlio witness had answered no, the error would have been harmless and disregarded on that account. But he answered yes. This was to throw into the jury-box the weight of the opinion of a former jury upon the matter'in issue, and was calculated to prejudice the plaintiff. Error.
Exhibit 10.I.4
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE
EL PASO CORPORATION
KEY EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PROTECTION PLAN
   EL PASO CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Gary J. KonnieGary J. KonnieIts Senior Vice President

Human Resources  /s/ David L. Siddall

Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



Employee
    
    Effective Date of ParticipationRobert W. Baker
    
    November 7, 2002Randy L. Bartley
    
    November 7, 2002Stephen C. Beasley
    
    November 7, 2002James J. Cleary
    
    November 7, 2002Daniel F. Collins
    
    November 7, 2002Bruce Connery
    
    November 7, 2002John T. Elzner
    
    November 7, 2002Rodney D. Erskine
    
    December 4, 2001Douglas L. Foshee
    
    September 2, 2003Greg G. Gruber
    
    November 7, 2002John L. Harrison
    
    November 7, 2002Peggy A. Heeg
    
    December 4, 2001John J. Hopper
    
    November 7, 2002Harvey R. Klingensmith
    
    November 7, 2002Gary J. Konnie
    
    November 7, 2002Charles W. Latch
    
    November 7, 2002Daniel B. Martin
    
    November 7, 2002Graciela E. Martinez
    
    November 7, 2002Kevin J. McMichael
    
    November 7, 2002D. Dwight Scott
    
    October 1, 2002David L. Siddall
    
    November 7, 2002Judy A. Vandagriff
    
    November 7, 2002Gene W. Waguespack
    
    November 7, 2002James C. Yardley
    
    November 7, 2002David E. Zerhusen
    
    October 1, 2002
  By:
    
    /s/ Gary J. Konnie

Gary J. KonnieIts Senior Vice PresidentHuman Resources
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Janice R. Browning, Controller (principal financial officer) of the registrant, certifythat:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SouthFirst Bancshares, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b)  [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained inSEC Release 34-47986]  c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        February 14, 2005 /s/ Janice R. Browning   Janice R. Browning   Controller and Treasurer(Chief Financial Officer)
Memorandum UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

Subject: Summary ofStakeholder Meetings From: John Bradfield OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

To: Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-6002, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 This memorandum summarizes meetings held with stakeholders in the month ofAugust, 2014 On August 28, Clean Air Markets Division Director Reid Harvey, Air Quality Policy Division Associate DirectorJuan Santiago and Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan met with Keith Baugues ofthe Indiana Department ofEnvironmental Management. Meeting handouts are attached. EPA generally answered basic questions aboutstate planning underthe clean power plan proposal forexisting sources.

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 161 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E2218-E2219]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          EARMARK DECLARATION

                                 ______
                                 

                       HON. CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, October 3, 2008

  Mr. SMITH of New Jersey. Madam Speaker, I submit the following:
  Requesting Member: Rep. Christopher H. Smith.
  Bill Number: H.R. 2638.
  Account: Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army Account.
  Legal Name of Requesting Entity: MILSPRAY Camouflage Technologies.
  Address of Requesting Entity: 1985 Swarthmore Ave, Lakewood, NJ 
08701.
  Description of Request: The Force Implementation Phase of this 
project is the final phase of ``Project Kryptolite--Field Deployable 
Multifunctional Stealth Coating.'' During Phase II, a complete turnkey 
``armor enhancement'' application system will be forward deployed to 
Iraq or other ARL-designated theater of operation. The completely 
integrated stealth coating system will be applied, in theater, to MRAP, 
Stryker, and other armored vehicles at the direction of Army and Marine 
Corps commanders. The Stealth Coating System addresses both infrared 
and thermal signature reduction as well as blast mitigation.
  This system can act as an ``armor enhancement'' material and be 
applied over existing MRAP, and similar tactical vehicle, armor 
systems.
  This armor enhancement approach would increase the level of blast 
resistance and substantially improve survivability. The use of this 
armor enhancement system will substantially reduce injuries and deaths 
resulting from IEDs, EFPs, and blast fragments. The material, and 
complete field deployable application system, will be forward deployed. 
MRAPs, Strykers, and other tactical vehicles will have the Kryptolite 
Armor Enhancement applied to them.

[[Page E2219]]

  Proposed Funds Utilization: Logistics Support: $100,000 System/
Personnel Deployment Costs.
  Salaries/Wages: $575,000 5-7 project technical personnel.
  Equipment: $200,000 Lab, Test, Production, Application.
  Testing Ballistic/Blast/Performance/Labs: $200,000.
  Facility Costs: $50,000.
  Material: $75,000.
  Total: $1,200,000.

                          ____________________
```