alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 701 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 701

To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, 
         New York, as the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 1999

  Mr. Moynihan (for himself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, 
         New York, as the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF RONALD H. BROWN FEDERAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, New York, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal 
Building''.
                                 <all>
```
2

been amended to account for the storage stability error (storage stability results have been removed). This 

adjustment has little impact on the derived flux profile for chlorpyrifos or total toxic chlorpyrifos 

residues. 

Flux Calculations 

DAS expressed concern over EPA’s use of a value of 0.42 for the von Karman (k) constant instead of 0.4 

in Aerodynamic method calculations. The k values used in the past have ranged from 0.4 to 0.42; 

however, it appears that a value of 0.42 is more commonly used. EPA has updated the DER to reflect the 

use of 0.4. This result is approximately a 10% reduction in the flux calculations. However, this only 

impacts the flux rates calculated using the aerodynamic method and not flux rates derived using the 

integrated horizontal flow method. The flux profile for the integrated horizontal flow method provides a 

more conservative flux profile. 

 

Consideration of Total Toxic Chlorpyrifos Residues 

While Dow AgroSciences supports the approach EPA used to determine the flux for the oxon, they 

expressed concern over the method employed to develop the flux profile for total toxic chlorpyrifos 

residues used in PERFUM analysis, as it appears not to be reasonable from a mass balance perspective. 

The generated total toxic chlorpyrifos residue flux profile is not based on mass balance approach, but 

rather is based on parent equivalent toxicity. The DER has been updated to also include a flux profile for 

total toxic residues based on mass. While there are multiple ways to account for the total toxic residues, 

the approach presented in the DER is reasonable.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 797

To apply the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 to the International

Olympic Committee.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 14, 1999

Mr. ASHCROFT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To apply the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 to

the International Olympic Committee.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘International Olympic

5 Committee Integrity Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

7 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds the following:

8 (1) The International Olympic Committee has

9 been beset by allegations of illegal and improper
2

•S 797 IS

1 gifts made to its members during the bid process in

2 which cities compete to host the Olympic games.

3 (2) In order to maintain the integrity of the

4 Olympic games, reforms are necessary to ensure that

5 future Olympic games are awarded to host cities in

6 an impartial manner.

7 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to prevent

8 persons from unfairly influencing the International Olym9 pic Committee with respect to the process in which cities

10 compete to host the Olympic games.

11 SEC. 3. APPLICATION OF FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES

12 ACT OF 1977 TO INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC

13 COMMITTEE.

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 104(h)(2) of the Foreign

15 Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (15 U.S.C. 78dd–2(h)(2))

16 is amended by adding at the end the following:

17 ‘‘(C) The term ‘foreign official’ includes any

18 member of, employee of, or any person acting in an

19 official capacity for or on behalf of, the International

20 Olympic Committee.’’.

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

22 subsection (a) shall apply to any act occurring on or after

23 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                     2681
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              1411
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                               48869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          57987
<PP&E>                                                    37687
<DEPRECIATION>                                            13429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            88705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     16089
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                     91
<OTHER-SE>                                                52200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              88705
<SALES>                                                   42873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          42873
<CGS>                                                     24766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             24766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          17854
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (487)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              (190)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (297)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (297)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOEL MORALES-CARRILLO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-71522 

Agency No. A099-630-227 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 9, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Noel Morales-Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for withholding of removal 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 13 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-71522 

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we deny the petition.

Morales-Carrillo’s opening brief does not challenge the agency’s 

determination that he is ineligible for withholding of removal. He therefore has

forfeited any such challenges. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079–

80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening 

brief are forfeited).

Morales-Carrillo instead contends that the agency erred by determining that

he failed to establish eligibility for CAT relief. We review this contention under the 

“highly deferential” substantial evidence standard. See Singh v. Holder, 753 F.3d 

826, 830 (9th Cir. 2014). The record does not compel the conclusion that MoralesCarrillo will more likely than not be tortured by or with the acquiescence of a 

government official if returned to Mexico. See Robelto-Pastora v. Holder, 591 F.3d 

1051, 1058 (9th Cir. 2010). Thus, substantial evidence supports the agency’s 

determination. See id. Contrary to Morales-Carrillo’s contention, the record does 

not suggest that the BIA failed to consider all evidence. See Cole v. Holder, 659 

F.3d 762, 771 (9th Cir. 2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME Page **1** of **1**

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

CAUSE NO. DA 20 - 0333
IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: JEFFERY PATRICK HEENAN,

Petitioner & Appellant, and SARAH KATE WALLACE,

Respondent & Appellee. **ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME** 
BASED UPON the Appell an t ’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, and good cause appearing, therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Appell an t is given an extension of time until September 30 , 2020, to prepare, file and serve the Appell an t’s Opening B rief. Dated this ___ day of ________________ 20 20 .

___________________________ Montana Supreme Court Judge

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 31 2020

07/31/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0333
TableName

FurnaceData

Series

ModelTranslation

GAMADirectory-March2005

Pressure

Power

DelayTimes

SeriesReference

Bilbiographies

SeriesTradeNames

T_Manufacturers

T_TradeNames

X_*
Description

Contains furnace information such as input capacity, output capacity, AFUE, blower motor type, and blower 

dimensions gathered from the GAMA directory database and manufacturers' product literature. Information in 

this table is sorted by furnace model number.

Contains information related to a series of furnaces including manufacturer, related brands, warranty 

information, etc. The field Series_ID is included in the FurnaceData table to serve as a linking variable to the 

The ModelTranslation table lists the model numbers used in the Furnace Data table and shows their equivalent 

in the GAMADirectory table.

GAMA's March 2005 version of the Consumers' Directory of Certified Efficiency Ratings for Heating Equipment. 

See Disclaimer.

Contains information on airflow (CFM) at different static pressures (in.w.g.) for different blower motor speeds. 

The field FurnaceData_ID is also included in this table; it is the linking variable between the FurnaceData table 

and the Pressure table.

Contains information on power consumption (in Watts) for the furnace blower motor at different static 

pressures (in.w.g.) for different blower motor speeds. The Pressure_ID is also included in the Power table; it is 

the linking variable between the Pressure table and the Power table. Power consumption for the furnace 

blower motor is not available for all models.

Contains pre-purge, post-purge, on-delay, off-delay, and ignitor on-time information. The field Series_ID is 

included in the DelayTimes table to serve as a linking variable to the Series table.

SeriesReferences table provides a link between the Series table and the Bibliographies table

Contains bibliographies of all of the product literature used in the database.

Contains information on similar furnaces that have different trade names. Links to Series table through the 

Series Field.

Contains contact information for the furnace manufacturers.

Contains information related to the different trade names used by furnace manufacturers.

All X_* tables contain values associated with some of the variables used in the above furnace data tables.
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Craig Armstrong, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated: March 5, 2013

| | /s/ J. Craig
      Armstrong         
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | J. Craig Armstrong                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Form 10-Q for the six months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements and Notes, thereto.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 533,000
<SECURITIES>                                         1,546,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10,269,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           200,000
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    12,108,000
<PP&E>                                               2,356,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                         280,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      16,841,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                7,916,000
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                 5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           7,328,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        16,841,000
<SALES>                                             24,295,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    24,295,000
<CGS>                                               19,561,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       23,220,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     163,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        952,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                           415,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,075,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           537,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .11
        

</TABLE>
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. S. M. Peck, Appellant.

Receiving Stolen Property: verdict : appeal.

*Appeal from Appanoose District Court.*— Hon. Dell Stuart, Judge.

Tuesday, January 20, 1891.

The defendant appears to have been tried and convicted of the crime of feloniously receiving stolen goods. He *appeals.*

Affirmed.

*"Geo. D. Porter,*for appellant.

*John 7. Stone,*Attorney General, for appellee.

Rothrook, J.

The cause is presented to us upon a transcript of the instructions to the jury requested by the defendant, and upon the instructions given by the court on its own motion. The record also sets forth the verdict, motion for a new trial, and judgment.. This is the entire record. There is no argument or brief for either party. We have examined the case so far as it has been presented, and discover no error. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Cinema Ride, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



                                                  /s/ MITCHELL J. FRANCIS
Date:  November 13, 2003                     By:  ___________________________
                                                  Mitchell J. Francis
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
#### Frances Schillaci, as Administratrix, etc., of Vincent Schillaci, Deceased, Plaintiff, *v.*John J. Fountaine and Joseph H. Hart, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Rensselaer County,

October 22, 1937.

*568
      *Philip J. Cirillo,*for the plaintiff.

*Clinton, Scott & McNamee,*for the defendant Hart.

*George F. Curley,*for the defendant Fountaine.

Bergan, J.

On the 22d day of April, 1937, plaintiff’s intestate and another man were killed by a car owned by the defendant Hart and operated by defendant Fountaine. The testimony indicates culpable negligence. Had any care whatever been exercised by Fountaine, the accident, and the consequent death of these two men, would have been avoided. At the trial a verdict of $17,000 has been returned against Fountaine. He apparently has no employment, no property from which any part of this judgment may be satisfied.

The defendant Hart has succeeded in avoiding any responsibility for the death of plaintiff’s husband upon the ground that at the time of the accident Fountaine, who is his brother-in-law and lives with him, had no permission or consent to use the car. The jury having necessarily found this to have been a fact, by its verdict against the driver but not against the owner, it is clear that good ground exists for the prosecution of the defendant Fountaine for the larceny of the car.

A defense of this sort should not succeed without incurring the risk of criminal prosecution of the person using an automobile without consent.

The owner who permits the use of a motor vehicle by another is responsible for the negligence of the operator. (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 59.) One who uses a motor vehicle without permission is guilty of larceny. (Penal Law, • § 1293-a.) Where permission to use the vehicle ends, larceny begins. There is no neutral ground between. Either the owner is responsible for death or injury due to the negligence of the operator, or the operator is guilty of larceny. Permission creates a civil liability of the owner; lack of it creates a criminal liability of the operator.

The record justifies action by prosecuting officials. I direct that a copy of the testimony of the owner and the operator be sent to the district attorney of Albany county, where the accident occurred, for such action as he may deem proper.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                ABLE ENERGY, INC.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Able Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy Harrington,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Able Energy, Inc. and will be retained by Able Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: September 29, 2003



/s/ Timothy Harrington
----------------------
Timothy Harrington
Chief Executive Officer