alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 2 o Buffer distance: 10 feet

o Release Height: 20 inches

o Droplet Size: A combination of spray nozzl es and appropriate pressure must be

selected to provide ASABE standard S571.1 droplet size category of fine (DV 0.5 

# of ≥

180 microns) or coarser than fine.

o Maximum ground wind speed: 15 mph

For ground applications, EFED estimated risk to lis ted terrestrial plants from exposure via spray

drift based on BASF’s proposed label language and estimated environmental concentrations

(EECs) generated by the AgDRIFT model ( Table 1 ). Risk quotients (RQs) for no buffer range

from 285 to 289 whereas RQs for a 10 foot buffer range from 6 to 26. Therefore, a buffer of 10

feet for ground applications redu ces RQs for listed terres trial plants from exposure via spray drift

by 11 to 45 fold. In addition, distances from the edge of field where RQs for exposure via spray

drift fall below the terrestrial plant Level of Concern (LOC) are reduced by 10 feet ( Table 2 ). It

should be noted that reductions in RQs for expos ure via runoff or distances from the edge of

field where RQs for exposure via runoff fall below the terrestrial plant LOC cannot be

quantified.3Table 1. Risk Quotients (RQs) for Listed Terrestrial Plants from Exposure via Spray Drift from Ground Application Based onEstimated Environmental Concentrations(EECs) Generated by the AgDRIFT ModelMost SensitiveSpeciesToxicity Endpoint:Seedling EmergenceNOAEC (Dicot)LOAEC (Monocot)*(lb a.i./A)BufferDistance(ft)EEC (lb a.i./A)Ground Application; Low Boom (20 Inches)RQ(EEC/Toxicity Endpoint)VF-F Drop SizeVF-F Drop SizeVF-F Drop SizeVF-F Drop Size50thpercentile90thpercentile50thpercentile90thpercentile50thpercentile90thpercentile50thpercentile90thpercentileDicot: TomatoMonocot: Oat0.0007060 0.2017 0.2038 0.2009 0.2015 286 289 285 28510 0.0085 0.0185 0.0045 0.0055 12 26 6 8VF-F = Very Fine to Fine; F-M/C = Fine to Medium/Course*LOAEC used in lieu of NOAEC due to the lack of adefinitive NOAECTable 2. Distances From Edge of Field Where RQs for Exposure via Spray Drift from Ground Application Fall Below theTerrestrial Plant Level of Concern (LOC) for Seedling Emergence EndpointsMost Sensitive SpeciesBuffer Distance (ft)Distance (ft) From Edge of Field Where RQ for Exposure via SprayDrift Falls Below the Terrestrial Plant Level of Concern (LOC) forSeedling Emergence EndpointsGround Application; Low Boom (20 Inches)VF-F Drop SizeF-M/C Drop Size90thpercentile50thpercentile90thpercentile50thpercentileDicot: TomatoMonocot: Oat*0 299 135 138 6610 289 125 128 56VF-F = Very Fine to Fine; F-M/C = Fine to Medium/Course* distances from the edge of field calculated using the LOAEC due to the lack of a definitive NOAEC
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Kevin  Monson,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report of  Ecological  Services,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period
ended June 30, 2000 fully complies  within the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
such Form 10-QSB  fairly  represents  in all  material  respects  the  financial
condition and results of operations of Ecological Services, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ Kevin Monson
                                           ----------------------------
                                        Name: Kevin Monson
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer


I,  Kevin  Monson,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report of  Ecological  Services,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period
ended June 30, 2000 fully complies  within the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
such Form 10-QSB  fairly  represents  in all  material  respects  the  financial
condition and results of operations of Ecological Services, Inc.



                                          By: /s/ Kevin Monson
                                             --------------------------
                                          Name: Kevin Monson
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form
10-Q of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Lesch     
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | James E. Lesch         
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 515 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-136, K2025-134.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25268 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Frederick National Laboratory Advisory Council, October 23, 2024, 9:00 a.m. to October 23, 2024, 5:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 9606 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850 (Virtual Meeting), which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 1, 2024, FR Doc. 2024-22438, 89 FR 79937.                

This notice is being amended to change the meeting start and end times. The meeting will now be held from 12:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. instead of from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: October 16, 2024. 

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-24325 Filed 10-21-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form l0-Qfor the period ended April 3, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. T. Malugen, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

##### **(1)**           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

##### ** **

##### **(2)**           The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the report.

 

 

Date:  May 13, 2005

 

 
| /s/ J. T. Malugen             |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Name: J. T. Malugen           |
| Its: Chief Executive  Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Movie Gallery, Inc. and will be retained by Movie Gallery,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be consideredfiled as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1





                   [LETTERHEAD OF GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP

                  Certified Public Accountants and Consultants]




INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


To the Board of Directors
Educational Video Conferencing, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement of Educational Video
Conferencing, Inc. on this Form S-3 of our report dated February 1, 2002 on the
financial statements of Educational Video Conferencing, Inc. as of December 31,
2001 and 2000 and for the years then ended appearing in the annual report on
Form 10-KSB of Educational Video Conferencing, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2001. We also consent to the reference of our firm under the caption
"Experts" contained in such Registration Statement.

/s/

GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

March 15, 2002


--------
#### GEORGE W. SWEPSON, to the use of G. W. CLAYTON, v. A. T. SUMMEY, Adm'r.

Where, upon an appeal to this court, no error is assigned, and there i se-no error apparent upon the record, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

This was a Motion heard before Ilenry. -Z, at Fall Term, 1875, of the Superior Court of Buncomcbe county.

Notice was issued to the defendant as administrator of W. A. Patton, deceased, to show cause why execution *<1e proj/riiti*should not be issued against him, judgment absolute having been rendered at Fall Term, 1867, in favor of the plaintiff on specialty filed against A. B. Chunn & Co., the firm being composed of A. B. Chunn, E. Clayton and the intestate of the defendant.

After execution was issued, no plea being filed, G. W. Clayton paid off the judgment and took an assignment of the same to his own use. The notice to show cause was then issued and served. No answer to the rule was filed, and the case was continued from term to term for several years, always for the defendant, lie desiring the evidence of G. W. Clayton, who resides in the county, was often there, and who has only been away from the county during the last year. The counsel alleged that a subpoena had been served upon him, but it did not appear in the papers. lie did appear once before the Court, at Chambers, but ivas not examined.

No plea or suggestion of a want of assets was ever made upon the original motion for notice to issue.

It was shown to the court that the defendant had been fixed with assets to the amount of the judgment, and that the sheriff liad failed to find any thing in his hands.

When the case was called at Fall Term, 1875, the defendant had G. W. Clayton called, and upon his failure to an*552swer, the defendant moved the court again to continue the case on account of his absence. The motion was refused.

Upon the intimation of the court that the plaintiff was entitled to execution, the defendant’s counsel then demanded a jury, and said lie had no other witness.

Counsel for the plaintiff stated that he had no objection to calling a jury. Clayton was again called, and upon his failure to answer, the court ordered execution to issue against the plaintiff as prayed for. The defendant appealed.

No counsel in this court, for appellant.

*J. II.*Marrimon, contra.

Reads, J.

No reason is assigned by the appellant, why execution should not issue against the defendant *de bonis projoriis,*as ordered, and we see none in the record.

There is no error. This will be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
#### HERMAN R. BALTZER v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA.

*Action Against the State*— Jurisdiction.

The decision of this Court in the case of *Baltzer and Taalcs*v. *The State of North Carolina,*104 N. C., 265, in respect to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court over actions of this character, is reaffirmed.

This is an ORIGINAL action, instituted in the Supreme Court, under Art. 4, § 9 of the Constitution,, to recover the amount due upon the coupons of a certain alleged bond of the State of North Carolina, purporting to have been issued in aid of the Chatham Railroad Company, under an ordinance of the Convention of North Carolina, ratified 11th March, 1868.

*Mr. E. C. Smith,*for plaintiff.

*Mr. Theo. F. Davidson,*Attorney-General; for defendant.

Merrimon, C. J.:

We cannot hesitate to decide that this Court has no jurisdiction of the cause of action alleged in the complaint. It plainly comes within what was said in *Horne*
      *188v. *The State,*84 N. C., 362, and *Baltzer*v. *The State,*104 N. C., 265, cases very thoroughly argued, and decided by the Court, after much earnest consideration. We are called upon to overrule those cases and proceed to consider the case upon its merits, and determine the important questions presented by the pleadings. Nothing appears from the brief of the learned counsel for the plaintiff, nor can we conceive of any adequate reason that ought to prompt us to do so. For the reasons sufficiently stated in the cases cited *supra,*the motion of the Attorney-General to dismiss the action must be allowed.

Action dismissed.
Exhibit 99



AMERICAN COMMUNITY PROPERTIES TRUST
222 SMALLWOOD VILLAGE CENTER
ST. CHARLES, MARYLAND  20602





April 15, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20549

|Re: | Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 for American Community Properties Trust
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Consistent with the Commission's release of March 18, 2002, please be advised that the Company has obtained a letter from Arthur Andersen LLP, the Company's independent public accountants, dated April 15, 2002, containing the following representations regarding the audits performed on the Company's balance sheets as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999:

- the audits were subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards.
- there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audits; and
- there was appropriate availability of national office consultation.

Representations relating to the availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen was not relevant to these audits.

Very truly yours,

AMERICAN COMMUNITY PROPERTIES TRUST

/s/ Cynthia L. Hedrick

Cynthia L. Hedrick

Vice President/Controller

CLH:mc
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)  of the Exchange Act

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advanstar, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Loggia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|By:   |  | /s/JOSEPH LOGGIAJoseph Loggia
Chief Executive Officer | 
|----- |  | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: |  | March 29, 2005                                        | 

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999     DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                            1,869,218       1,786,927
<SECURITIES>                              0               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         7,436          14,313
<ALLOWANCES>                              0               0
<INVENTORY>                               0               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,876,654       1,801,240
<PP&E>                                    0               0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,876,654       1,801,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               334,784         120,234
<BONDS>                                   0               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0               0
<PREFERRED>                               0               0
<COMMON>                                  0               0
<OTHER-SE>                        1,541,870       1,681,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,876,654       1,801,240
<SALES>                                   0               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     80,314         321,488
<CGS>                                     0               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    219,450         256,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (139,136)          65,424
<INCOME-TAX>                              0               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (139,136)          65,424
<DISCONTINUED>                            0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0               0
<CHANGES>                                 0               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (139,136)          65,424
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.014)            .007
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.014)            .007



</TABLE>
1

Hanzel, Veronica

From: Keller, Rusty [rkeller@doerun.com]

Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 4:43 PM

To: Hanzel, Veronica

Cc: Marucheau, Louis

Subject: RE: Clarification of an emission source listed in SIP demonstration

Ms. Hanzel, 

Yes, the Dross Plant fugitives were routed to #7 blast furnace building baghouse and confirmed with the ventilation study.

Calvin (Rusty) Keller 

Environmental Manager – Primary Smelting 

From: Hanzel, Veronica [mailto:vahanzel@rti.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 2:49 PM 

To: Keller, Rusty 

Cc: Laney, Michael N.; Nizich.Sharon@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Clarification of an emission source listed in SIP demonstration

Mr. Keller,

I am writing on behalf of Sharon Nizich of USEPA.  We are working on the RTR for the primary lead smelting MACT.  We

spoke back in October about a source “refinery plant fugitives” #50006 which you investigated for me and reported that

those emissions were now routed to BH#9 and as a 2007 ventilation study confirmed control of the emissions, the

source was removed from the 2008 emission inventory.  We have a second source that has come up that might be

similar.  The “dross plant fugitives” source #40006.  This source was in the SIP demonstration dataset but not in the 2008

EI.  Has this source also been removed?  If the source still exists, we believe we have erroneous source characteristics for

it.(i.e. would need data such as if it is  a volume or point source,  and if point source stack height, stack diameter, and

stack flow velocity and rate).   Could you please confirm the status of that source?  

We very much appreciate your help and cooperation in assuring the validity of our data, and look forward to your

prompt reply.      

Veronica "Ronnie" Hanzel

RTI International

Global Climate Change & Environmental Sciences Unit

Environmental Health & Economics Division

Phone: 919‐541‐8851    Fax: 919‐316‐3420

This message is intended solely for the designated recipient and may contain confidential, privileged or 

proprietary information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 

original and any copy or printout. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely 

those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Doe Run Company. Finally, the recipient 

should check this message and any attachments for the presence of viruses or malware. The Doe Run Company 

accepts no liability for any loss or damage caused through the transmission of this e-mail.