alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 10K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                1,398
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        14,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                            331
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     20,248
<PP&E>                                               49,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                        8,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      166,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                25,795
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             57,066
<OTHER-SE>                                            1,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        166,127
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     97,551
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        66,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     20,152
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    6,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       5,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                          2,053
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   3,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          3,023
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.51
<FN>
<F1>Net gain on fixed assets of $1,100 included.
</FN>



</TABLE>
# APPE N DIX 

# III

### Governor C .L

. "Butch" 

## Otter

Allo rney Go n a ra r
. 

### Offlce

. DE Q Do ug Conde 

### • 37 5-04 94 

### ' D, recto r Curt F r ansen 

### 373 ·0240 Stafe 

### Bo a rd o f E nvlron m o ntal Q u al

Deputy Director

Jess Byrne 373-0114 

# r--­

Air Quality Division AdminiSlrator Tiffany Floyd

37 3
· 0 552 B oise Regional Office

Adminlslrator P ete Wagner

173- 0 550

E n v i r o n m e ntal Mgmt. & Info. Dlv.

Administrator Sharon K ee n e

3 7 3-015S C O l3' ur d'Ale n e Regional Office

Adm i nistrator Dan Redline

769- 1 422

Technical Services Division Adm i nistrator Mark Dietr i ch

373
· 0 204 Idaho Falls Regional OffIce

Administrator E ri c k Neher 528-2650

Waste Mgmt.& Remediation Dlv.

Adm i nistrator Orville G r e e n

373 ·01 48 Lewiston Regional Office

Administrator John Cardwell

7 99
· 4370

W at er Q ua li ty Division Ad m i n i str at o r B arry B Urileil

3 73

- Q 1 9 04 P ocatello Regional Office

Administrator Bruce Olenick

236- 8'6 0

tNL Oversight Coordinator Susan Burke

373-0428 Twin Falls Reglonat Office

Admin i strator

Bill Allred 736-2190



### -

### ,­

c**>~** 

### H>

# iI~**!!s~** 

### 5'.§

­

# ~H 

# Hi
,**~** 

### '--- 

# T ,­ 

# dl f.

­ ' 

# .. ,., iJ.·i
<. 

# ," I' , 

# { 

# Hl

. r**~!jf** 

# ihf ' -1**i:~~** 

# Ff**~~~**

# ~q**f~** 

# , ii



# - ,**~~** - 0 

## . - I 

# , a 

# i i 

# • 

# T I**~** 

# T I 

# T ,-- ,-- r- 

# r r

# > 

# • 

# .**~** < 

# f j. 

# -; i ' 

# " i.f
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. P. Hester, Appellant.

Liquor Nuisance: indictment: appeal: submission on transcript NOT CONTAINING EVIDENCE.

*Appeal from Palo Alto District Court.*— Hon. Lot Thomas, Judge.

Saturday, May 28, 1892.

The defendant was indicted for keeping a nuisance by unlawfully keeping for sale and selling intoxicating liquors in a certain building. He pleaded not guilty, and was tried by a jury, and convicted of the offense, and from a judgment on the verdict he appeals.

*John Y. /Stone,*Attorney General, for the .state.

No appearance for appellee.

*753Per Curiam.

The appeal is presented 'to us upon a transcript of an in dietment and record entries of a trial hy jury, and a verdict of guilt and judgment on the verdict; and an appeal. There is no transcript of the evidence, nor of the instructions given hy the court to the jury. We have examined the record as presented, and discover no reason for disturbing the judgment of the district court. Affirmed.
#### Mart J. Fink, Appellant, v. Mart Mohn *et al.,*Appellees.

Appeal: assignments of error.

*Appeal from Linn District Court.*— Hon. J. H. Pre ton, Judge.

Wednesday, May 25, 1892.

The plaintiff filed her petition in equity, to which the defendants ■demurred upon the grounds, among others, that the petition shows on its face that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief demanded, nor to any relief; that it shows that John Fink, the deceased, made no false representation as to any existing fact to induce the plaintiff to sign the deed; *740and that it shows that the plaintiff's claim, if she ever had one, is barred by the statute of limitations. The demurrer was sustained on these grounds, to which plaintiff excepted, refusing to further plead. Judgment was entered dismissing her action and for costs, from which she appeals. —

*Dismissed.*

*Wm. G. Thompson,*for appellant.

*G. W. Kepler,*for appellees.

Given, J.

The appellees move to strike the appellant’s abstract and argument because no errors had been assigned or pointed out, and because no argument has been made by appellant on any errors assigned. By referring to Code section 2742, it will be seen that it is only “in equitable actions, wherein issue of fact is joined,” that the ease is triable anew in this court. The case is not before us on issues of fact, fornone were ever joined. The appeal is from a ruling on the defendants’ demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition. In *Powers v. O’Brien County,*54 Iowa, 501, and *Patterson v. Jack,*59 Iowa, 632, it was held that on appeal in an equitable case from a ruling upon motion or demurrer, exceptions must be taken and errors assigned as in an action by ordinary proceedings, and the hearing will be only upon errors assigned. This ease furnishes an apt illustration of the propriety of the rule. The appellant’s petition is quite lengthy, embracing ten paragraphs, covering six closely-printed pages. The appellant has not pointed out, either by assignment of errors or in argument, wherein it is claimed that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer. The appellees' motion to strike the abstract is sustained, and the appeal dismissed.
#### ELMSLY STAFFORD vs. ALLEN NEWSOM.

Where a judgment has been had in the Superior Court, and, on appeal to the • Supreme Court, the judgment is reversed for error, the whole judgment, a well for the costs as for the other matters, is set aside, and the costa must be taxed by the Court below, which finally determines the case.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Stanly County, at the Spring Term, 1851, his Honor Judge Manly ' presiding.

*Strange,*for the plaintiff.

*G. C. Mendenhall,*for the defendant.

Pearson, J.

By the judgment, at the Fall Term, 1850, .of Stanly Superior Court, the Clerk was directed to .tax costs in respect of no other witnesses, except those named. He departed from the order, and taxed costs in respect of certain other witnesses for attendance up to the time of the, trial in Montgomery, Spring Term, 1849, under the impression, that an order made at that term, allowing costs in respect of a larger number of witnesses, was still in force, and had the effect of qualifying to some' extent the order which formed a part of the judgment under which he was acting.

The Judge, in the Court below, adopted this view, and refused the motion for a retaxation. In this, there is error. The order made in Montgomery was an incident or rather a part of the judgment, which, on appeal, was set aside. 1 he question of costs, as well as the rights of the parties, was decided by the judgment in Stanly.

The defendant, by his appeal, established that the Judge who tried the case in Montgomery, took añ erroneous view of it, and the effect of the *venire "de novo*was not merely *18to relieve from the direct consequence of the error in its bearing upon the results of the case, but also from its indirect consequence in its influence upon the question of costs.

In other words, the order of the Judge, who determined the case, and who was in no error, is decisive as to the question of costs, because it is a part of the judgment. The position, that it is to be qualified and restricted, “ so as tt> make the two stand together,” by an order of. a Judge, who was in error, and' whose decision was reversed, is untenable.

The judgment refusing the motion for a retaxation must be reversed and the motion allowed. This opinion will be certified.

Per Curiam. Ordered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Janus Capital Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory A. Frost, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ Gregory A. FrostGregory A. Frost Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date:
February 28, 2008

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Janus Capital Group Inc. and will be retained by Janus Capital Group Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925661
<NAME> PLASMATRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,102
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,337)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  87
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (87)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (87)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (87)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
    THE CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF PREFERENCES OF
            THE 12% SERIES A SENIOR REDEEMABLE
             EXCHANGEABLE PREFERRED STOCK OF
                    R.H. PHILLIPS, INC.


John E. Giguiere and Lane C. Giguiere certify that:

1.   They are the President and Secretary, respectively, of R.H.
Phillips, Inc., a California corporation (the "Corporation").

2. Pursuant to the authority given under the Corporation's
Articles of Incorporation, the Board of Directors adopted a
Certificate of Determination (the "Certificate of
Determination") for the 12% Series A Senior Redeemable
Preferred Stock of the Corporation (the "Series A Preferred
Stock").

3.   The Corporation has repurchased all shares of the Series A
Preferred Stock and, therefore, there are no shares of that
series outstanding.

4.   The Certificate of Determination prohibits the Corporation
from issuing any additional shares of the Series A Preferred
Stock after shares of that series have been reacquired by the
Corporation.  The Articles of Incorporation of the
Corporation allow the Board of Directors to decrease the
number of shares of any series of Preferred Stock to a
number not less than the number of shares of that series then
outstanding.

5.   Therefore, by operation of Section 510(c) of the California
Corporations Code and pursuant to Section 401 (c) of the
California Corporations Code, the Board of Directors duly
approved the following resolution:


"RESOLVED, that the second paragraph of Section VII of
the Certificate of Determination is hereby amended in its
entirety as follows:

'The authorized number of shares of the Series A Senior
Redeemable Exchangeable Preferred Stock (the "Series A
Preferred Stock") shall be decreased to 0.  All of the shares
of the Series A Preferred Stock are returned to the status of
authorized but undesignated shares of Preferred Stock of the
Corporation.'"

6.   Pursuant to Sections 401(f) and 510(c) of the California
Corporations Code, the Series A Preferred Stock is no longer
an authorized series of the Preferred Stock of the
Corporation.  All of such shares are returned to the status of
authorized but undesignated shares of Preferred Stock of the
Corporation.

7.   The foregoing amendment to the Certificate of Determination
has been duly approved by the Board of Directors alone in
accordance with the California Corporations Code.

We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California that
the matters set forth in this certificate are true and correct of our own
knowledge.

Date: June 19, 2000               //s//John E. Giguiere
      ------------------------    ---------------------------
                                  John E. Giguiere, President

                                  //s//Lane C. Giguiere
                                  ---------------------------
                                  Lane C. Giguiere, Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 85989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25082]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 24-076]


Astrophysics Advisory Committee

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a 
meeting of the Astrophysics Advisory Committee.

DATES: Thursday, November 7, 2024, 9 a.m.-5 p.m., and Friday, November 
8, 2024, 9 a.m.-5 p.m., All times are eastern time.

ADDRESSES: Public attendance will be virtual only. Webex registration 
information below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Morris, Designated Federal 
Officer, Astrophysics Advisory Committee, NASA Headquarters, 
Washington, DC 20546, via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#234742554a470d400d4e4c51514a50634d4250420d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5c1c4d3ccc18bc68bc8cad7d7ccd6e5cbc4d6c48bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a> or at (202) 
718-9061.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As noted above, this meeting will be open to 
the public via Webinar and telephonically. Any interested person must 
use a touch-tone phone to participate in this meeting. The Webex 
connectivity information for each day will be provided to those who 
register in advance through the registration link below. For audio, 
when you join the Webex event, you may use your computer or provide 
your phone number to receive a call back, otherwise, call the U.S. toll 
conference number listed for each day in the registration information 
that is sent after registration. Attendees must preregister to receive 
meeting connection information. Preregister at: https://nasaevents.webex.com/nasaevents/j.php?MTID=m94141b8705290e7765ef0e2fef80bcb7.
    The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

--Astrophysics Division Update
--Updates on Specific Astrophysics Missions
--Discussion of reports from the Program Analysis Groups

    The public may submit and upvote comments/questions ahead of the 
meeting through the website: https://nasa.cnf.io/sessions/n24m/#!/dashboard, that will be opened for input on October 28, 2024.
    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.
    For more information, please visit https://beta.science.nasa.gov/researchers/nac/science-advisory-committees/apac/.

Jamie M. Krauk,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-25082 Filed 10-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT RYAN COULTER NEWMAN,

Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D21-3882 September 30, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Laura E. Ward, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. MORRIS, C.J., and CASANUEVA and STARGEL, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
II

Calendar No. 4

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 43

To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to any State or local educational

agency that denies or prevents participation in constitutional prayer

in schools.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

JANUARY 20, 1999

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to any State

or local educational agency that denies or prevents participation in constitutional prayer in schools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voluntary School Pray5 er Protection Act’’.
2

•S 43 PCS

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING CONTINGENT ON RESPECT FOR CON2 STITUTIONAL SCHOOL PRAYER.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law, no funds made available through the Depart5 ment of Education shall be provided to any State or local

6 educational agency that has a policy of denying, or that

7 effectively prevents participation in, constitutional prayer

8 in public schools by individuals on a voluntary basis.

9 (b) LIMITATION.—No person shall be required to par10 ticipate in prayer, or shall influence the form or content

11 of any constitutional prayer, in a public school.

Calendar No. 4

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 43

A BILL

To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to any

schools.prevents participation in constitutional prayer inState or local educational agency that denies or

JANUARY 20, 1999

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
#### Radtke Brothers & Kortsch Company and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

*March 13*

May *5, 1942.*

For the appellants there was a brief by *Otjen & Otjen*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *T. P. Otjen.*

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Levitan.*

For the respondent Valeska Moebius there was a brief by *Gold & McCann*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Ray T. McCann.*

Fairchild, J.

Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Wicichem, and the writer are of opinion that the facts in the record support the conclusions and award of the Industrial Commission and that the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Fowler, Mr. Justice Fritz, and Mr. *411Justice Martin are of contrary view and of opinion that the judgment should be reversed.

Under the rule the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      14,591,000
<SECURITIES>                                19,669,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,583,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (95,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,463,000
<PP&E>                                       6,698,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,992,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             253,260,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,173,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 241,799,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               253,260,000
<SALES>                                      6,474,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,474,000
<CGS>                                        1,845,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               83,603,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (75,990,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (75,990,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (75,990,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.56)


</TABLE>