alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 6/11/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2015 ND 145

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Jan David Hornor, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20140367

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Gary E. Euren, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, 402 First St. N.W., Mandan, ND 58554-3118, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Hornor

No. 20140367

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Jan David Hornor appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of manufacturing methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine, possession of amphetamine, and possession of drug paraphernalia.  Hornor argues it was obvious error for the district court not to provide an adverse-inference jury instruction regarding the State’s failure to produce evidence showing Hornor’s fingerprints were on the items of drug paraphernalia seized from his residence.  To establish obvious error, the defendant must show there was:  “(1) error; (2) that is plain; and (3) affects substantial rights.”  State v. Gresz, 2006 ND 135, ¶ 7, 717 N.W.2d 583 (emphasis added) (concluding when the defendant did not show there is evidence to support a self-defense claim, “we cannot say the failure to instruct the jury on self-defense was error, let alone obvious error.”).  We conclude Hornor did not show it was error for the district court to not provide an unrequested adverse- inference instruction under the circumstances of this case, let alone establish that it amounted to obvious error.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT (23)-1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-58170) pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated 1998
Stock Incentive Plan of The Banc Corporation and Commerce Bank of Alabama
Incentive Stock Compensation Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-70953) pertaining to The
Banc Corporation 401(k) Plan of our report dated January 31, 2002 (except for
the second paragraph of Note 22 as to which the date is February 8, 2002), with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Banc Corporation and
Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

                                        /s/  Ernst & Young LLP

Birmingham, Alabama
March 26, 2002
Exhibit 10.18.2
 Amendment to Employment Agreement
 Amendment
 W I T N E S S E T H:
 WHEREAS Employment Agreement
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1.
    
    Section 4.3 (a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety as follows:
 Stock Options




---



##### 



3.
    
    Miscellaneous.
 (a)
    
    Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws and decisions of the State of Illinois, without giving
effect to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof.(b)
    
    Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in
full force and effect and unmodified, and all provisions thereof shall apply with
respect to such agreement as modified hereby.(c)
    
    Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an
original and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same agreement.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 LIME ENERGY CO.
    
    
    
    David R. AsplundBy: 
Name:
    
    /s/ Richard Kiphart

Richard Kipart
    
    
    
    /s/ David R, AsplundTitle:
    
    Chairman of the Board
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

BRYAN PERRY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 163 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of December, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration and decision of this matter.
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of the Registrant



 Exhibit 4.1 

 

 

 COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK 

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN 

DEFINITIONS AND LEGENDS 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS 

OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

THIS CERTIFIES THAT 

is the owner of 

CUSIP 69404D 10 8 

PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 

PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 

VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL AND CORPORATE SECRETARY CHAIRMAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT 

FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.0001 EACH, OF 

transferable on the books of the Corporation upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not
valid unless 
 countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 

WITNESS the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly authorized officers. 

Dated: 

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 

MELLON INVESTOR SERVICES LLC 

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 

BY: 

PB 001 








 

 

 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
 TEN
COM – as tenants in common 
 TEN ENT – as tenants in entireties 

JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 

UNIF GIFT ACT- (Cust) Custodian (Minor) 

under Uniform Gifts to Minors 

Act (State) 

UNIF TRF Min ACT- (Cust) Custodian (until age) 

(Minor) under Uniform Transfers 

to Minors Act (State) 

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto 

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 

Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 

Dated 

Notice: 

The signature(s) to this Assignment must correspond with the name(s) as written upon the face of the Certificate in every
particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever. 
 Signature(s) Guaranteed 

The signature(s) should be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (banks, stockholders, savings and loan
association and credit unions with membership in an approved signature guarantee medallion program) pursuant to S.E.C Rule 17 Act.
Jeff Besougloff/DC/USEPA/US

10/01/2008 12:36 PM

To

Kenneth Rotert/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, KarlD Anderson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Chris Hoff/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Total Coliform Rule Revisions

Thank you for sharing your efforts at a meaningful a nd timely two

- way

exchange with tribal officials on the review and possible revision of the

Total Coliform Rule (TCR). Your efforts have resulted in an open exchange

of information, expression of tribal views, and the commitment to

c onsider tribal views in EPA decision

- making. AIEO is in agreement that

tribal consultation opportunities were made available and that tribal

consultation on the development of the proposed rule has occurred.

Jeff Besougloff

Associate Director

U.S. Environmental Protection Age ncy (East Building)

American Indian Environmental Office (4104 M)

1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room 3334

Washington, DC 20004

(202) 564

- 0292

Fax: 202 564

- 0298
No. 43.

#### George S. Russell v. Edward G. Harris.

An action of assumpsit for $420.69, the balance of an account for lumber delivered by appellant’s firm to Frank Stewart, who had contracted to erect two houses for appellee. The claim was that defendant promised, before the delivery, to pay the bill *prorata*with those of other parties, for material furnished to the contractor and put into these buildings, which he denied. Plaintiff’s clerk, who went to see him on the subject, testified that he understood him in the course of conversation to make the promise stated. Defendant testified that he might have said and probably did say he would do, voluntarily, as well by them as by any others, but expressly and positively refused to be bound as by a promise. These were all the witnesses and this the substance of all the evidence upon the only question of fact that was in dispute. It appeared that defendant did pay. others in full, but only upon Stewart’s orders, and that upon like orders he paid plaintiff’s firm something over $400, and the balance to Stewart before he received notice that anything remained due to them. The question was submitted to the jury upon this evidence, under instructions to which no specific objection is urged, and they found for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Judge below, Cyrus Epler.

Attorneys, for appellant, Messrs. Morrison & Whitlock ;

for appellee, Mr. Osoar A. De Leuw.

Opinion filed Dec. 4, 1885.

Opinion by Pleasants, J.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1               1534566.15       3409141.84                0        36590858.16
A10              1296034.39                0                0           32915160
A11                 2984625                0                0           75800000
A2                934043.98       4243624.63                0        20756375.37
A3               9854376.81      32302768.48                0       227697231.52
A4               4588870.71      14399139.52                0       106480860.48
A5               1902970.01       5546194.04                0        44453805.96
A6               2297415.12       5487587.36                0        54512412.65
A7                418359.34                0                0           10625000
A8                 304762.5                0                0            7740000
A9               3317501.25                0                0           84254000
APO                       0          7373.23                0          582366.23
AR                   118.68              100                0                  0
B1                 503256.4         70278.27                0        12740721.72
B2                408858.99         57095.96                0        10350904.04
B3                141537.19         19765.24                0         3583234.75
B4                 94318.82         13171.35                0         2387828.65
B5                  62931.6          8788.21                0         1593211.79
B6                 78636.47          9270.65           1710.7         1990805.32


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10647]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      BAD BETS MADE BY WALL STREET

  (Mr. DeFAZIO asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. DeFAZIO. The legislation the House will take up tomorrow that was 
jammed through the Senate last night will do nothing for the weakening 
fundamentals in the United States. It isn't going to help with 
declining housing prices, foreclosures, job loss, income disparity, or 
lack of health care. None of those things will be addressed. It doesn't 
address the crumbling infrastructure. It is not aimed at the real 
economy. It is aimed at the fraud, the speculative activity and the bad 
bets made by Wall Street executives.
  Now they purport this is necessary to free up credit, and some are 
going to say I am voting for the bill because it lifts the FDIC limit. 
The administration can do that without spending $700 billion. They are 
going to say I'm doing it because it changed the mark-to-market rules. 
Those two things are critical to my banks at home in Oregon, but you 
can do that without spending $700 billion with a stroke of the pen.
  It leaves out one other critical measure, the certificate's net worth 
that it would use for the savings and loan. That would take 
legislation, and that is not in here.
  We are going to spend $700 billion to solve a problem that could 
perhaps be resolved for no cost to the American taxpayer. If we are 
going to borrow money, borrow it to invest in America's Main Street, 
not Wall Street.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TRDS 441 Hector Associates, LP, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 1316 C.D. 2022

:

Conshohocken Zoning Hearing :

Board :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, August 24 , 2023

, having considered A ppellant ’ s application for

reargument and A ppellee OPS Realty Holding LLC’s answer in response thereto

,

the application is DENIED

.
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Ann Hays, Appellant.

Appeal: record : dismissal.

*Appeal from Jefferson District Court.*

Wednesday, February 10, 1892.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted upon a charge of keeping and maintaining a nuisance.

No appearance for defendant.

*Jolm Y.*Stone, Attorney General, for the state.

Per Curiam.

The cause was submitted to this court upon a transcript without abstract or argument, and it does not appear that any appeal was taken from the judgment of the district court. In this state of the record there is no question presented which we can determine. The case is therefore dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     condensed financial statements contained in the Form 10-Q for the six
     months ended June 30, 1998 for the Aetna Insurance Company of America and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000925988
<NAME>                        Aetna Insurance Company of America
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
<CURRENCY>                                           USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           136
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              0
<EQUITIES>                                       0
<MORTGAGE>                                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 136
<CASH>                                          13
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          56
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,123
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          151
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         3
<OTHER-SE>                                      50
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,123
<PREMIUMS>                                       0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              5
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   0
<BENEFITS>                                       5
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          0
        

</TABLE>
<pre>

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that:

(i) the Annual Report  on Form 10-KSB of  the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2005 , (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a)  or Section 15(d),  as applicable, of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                      /s/   Inti Shaikh
                      ---------------------------
                      Inti Shaikh
                      CEO
                     (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  January 14, 2008



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley
Act of 2002 the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that:

(i) the Annual Report  on Form 10-KSB of  the Company for the  year
ended December 31, 2005,(the Report) fully complies with  the
requirements of Section 13(a)  or Section 15(d),  as applicable, of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                        VOTE POWER CORPORATION
                        /S/ Inti Shaikh
                        ----------------------------
                        Inti Shaikh
                        Secretary/Treasurer
                        (Principal Financial Officer)


Dated:  January 14, 2008
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Omar Pimentel
Appellate case number: 01

- 2 1

- 00 702

- CR

Trial court case number: 2386503

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 7 of Harris County

On December 1 3 , 202 1 , appellant, through counsel, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s December 8, 2021 order denying his pre

- trial application for writ of habeas
corpus . On January 4, 2022 , the complete appellate record was filed with this Court . After a review of the appellate record, the Court determines that it desires briefing. See T EX

. R. A PP . P

. 31.1. Accordingly, app ellant is ordered to file a brief within twenty days of the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, 31.1. The State’s brief, if any, is due to be filed no later than twenty days from the filing of appellant ’s brief.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: ___

/s/ April Farris

________  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___ January 11, 2022

_____
Year GHG Change SCC 5% DC SCC 3% DC SCC 2.5% DC SCC 3% DC 

(95th%) SCC 5% DC SCC 3% DC SCC 2.5% DC SCC 3% DC (95th%)

in tons of CO2-

e/MMBTU (2010$/ton) (2010$/ton) (2010$/ton) (2010$/ton) (2010$gallon) (2010$gallon) (2010$gallon) (2010$gallon)

2013 0.09719697 $5.55 $23.82 $38.62 $72.52 -$0.54 -$2.31 -$3.75 -$7.05

2014 (0.00941173) $5.77 $24.33 $39.30 $74.17 $0.05 $0.23 $0.37 $0.70

2015 (0.00941173) $5.99 $24.84 $39.99 $75.82 $0.06 $0.23 $0.38 $0.71

2016 (0.00941173) $6.21 $25.35 $40.68 $77.46 $0.06 $0.24 $0.38 $0.73

2017 (0.00941173) $6.43 $25.86 $41.37 $79.11 $0.06 $0.24 $0.39 $0.74

2018 (0.00941173) $6.64 $26.37 $42.05 $80.75 $0.06 $0.25 $0.40 $0.76

2019 (0.00941129) $6.86 $26.88 $42.74 $82.40 $0.06 $0.25 $0.40 $0.78

2020 (0.00941129) $7.08 $27.39 $43.43 $84.04 $0.07 $0.26 $0.41 $0.79

2021 (0.00941129) $7.39 $28.06 $44.30 $86.05 $0.07 $0.26 $0.42 $0.81

2022 (0.00941129) $7.70 $28.73 $45.17 $88.06 $0.07 $0.27 $0.43 $0.83

2023 (0.00941178) $8.00 $29.40 $46.04 $90.07 $0.08 $0.28 $0.43 $0.85

2024 (0.00941178) $8.31 $30.08 $46.91 $92.08 $0.08 $0.28 $0.44 $0.87

2025 (0.00941178) $8.62 $30.75 $47.78 $94.09 $0.08 $0.29 $0.45 $0.89

2026 (0.00941178) $8.92 $31.42 $48.64 $96.10 $0.08 $0.30 $0.46 $0.90

2027 (0.00941178) $9.23 $32.09 $49.51 $98.11 $0.09 $0.30 $0.47 $0.92

2028 (0.00941183) $9.54 $32.76 $50.38 $100.12 $0.09 $0.31 $0.47 $0.94

2029 (0.00941183) $9.85 $33.43 $51.25 $102.13 $0.09 $0.31 $0.48 $0.96

2030 (0.00941183) $10.15 $34.11 $52.12 $104.14 $0.10 $0.32 $0.49 $0.98

2031 (0.00941183) $10.46 $34.78 $52.99 $106.15 $0.10 $0.33 $0.50 $1.00

2032 (0.00941183) $10.77 $35.45 $53.86 $108.16 $0.10 $0.33 $0.51 $1.02

2033 (0.01005801) $11.08 $36.12 $54.73 $110.17 $0.11 $0.36 $0.55 $1.11

2034 (0.01005801) $11.38 $36.79 $55.60 $112.18 $0.11 $0.37 $0.56 $1.13

2035 (0.01005801) $11.69 $37.47 $56.47 $114.19 $0.12 $0.38 $0.57 $1.15

2036 (0.01005801) $12.00 $38.14 $57.34 $116.20 $0.12 $0.38 $0.58 $1.17

2037 (0.01005801) $12.30 $38.81 $58.21 $118.21 $0.12 $0.39 $0.59 $1.19

2038 (0.01005822) $12.61 $39.48 $59.08 $120.22 $0.13 $0.40 $0.59 $1.21

2039 (0.01005822) $12.92 $40.15 $59.95 $122.23 $0.13 $0.40 $0.60 $1.23

2040 (0.01005822) $13.23 $40.82 $60.82 $124.24 $0.13 $0.41 $0.61 $1.25

2041 (0.01005822) $13.54 $41.42 $61.51 $126.00 $0.14 $0.42 $0.62 $1.27

2042 (0.01005822) $13.85 $42.01 $62.19 $127.76 $0.14 $0.42 $0.63 $1.29

TOTAL: -0.1822 $2.16 $6.91 $10.41 $21.11

Annualized 

Average: -0.0061 $0.0227 $0.1134 $0.1918 $0.3472

GHG SCC Estimates for Soybean-Based Biodiesel (2013-2042)