alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
          FROM THE JUNE 30, 1998 BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
          AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
          BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<PERIOD-TYPE> 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END> JUN-30-1998
       
<S>                                                <C>
<CASH>                                                     217
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            3,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                                43
<INVENTORY>                                             11,081
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        15,108
<PP&E>                                                  38,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                           6,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          46,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    4,155
<BONDS>                                                 21,111
<COMMON>                                                14,191
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    4,532
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                               2,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            46,926
<SALES>                                                  9,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         9,654
<CGS>                                                    4,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            4,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          1,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                               615
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        914
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                               914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .11
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25167]



[[Page 86229]]

Vol. 89

Tuesday,

No. 209

October 29, 2024

Part III





Department of Defense





-----------------------------------------------------------------------





Chinese Military Companies; Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 89 , No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / 
Notices

[[Page 86230]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Removal of Designated Chinese Military Companies and 
Notice of Designation of Chinese Military Company; Supplemental Notice

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and 
Sustainment), Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of removal of a company from the 2023 Section 1260H List 
of Chinese Military Companies Operating in the United States and notice 
of designation of Chinese Military Company; supplemental notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Wednesday, October 23, 2024, the DoD published two notices 
entitled ``Notice of Removal of Designated Chinese Military Companies'' 
and ``Notice of Designation of Chinese Military Company.'' The notices 
were inadvertently published in the wrong order. Please see the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for details.

DATES: This correction is effective October 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Toppings, 571-372-0485.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Wednesday, October 23, 2024, the DoD 
published two notices entitled ``Notice of Removal of Designated 
Chinese Military Companies'' and ``Notice of Designation of Chinese 
Military Company.''
    The notice titled ``Notice of Designation of Chinese Military 
Company'' appeared at 89 FR 84547-84548. The notice titled ``Notice of 
Removal of Designated Chinese Military Companies'' appeared at 89 FR 
84555.
    On Wednesday, October 23, 2024, the DoD published two notices 
entitled ``Notice of Removal of Designated Chinese Military Companies'' 
and ``Notice of Designation of Chinese Military Company.'' The notices 
were inadvertently published in the wrong order. The notice titled 
``Notice of Removal of Designated Chinese Military Companies'' should 
have published in the Federal Register before the notice titled 
``Notice of Designation of Chinese Military Company,'' to publicly 
reflect that Hesai Technology Co., Ltd. (Hesai), the designated 
company, was removed from the Chinese Military Companies list on the 
basis of the original listing record and then added to the list on a 
new record based on the latest information available. This supplemental 
notice is necessary to clearly identify that Hesai is currently 
included on the Chinese Military Companies list. The Department is 
reprinting both notices in the correct order.

    Dated: October 24, 2024.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-25167 Filed 10-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-597 and 731-TA-1407 (Review)]

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on cast iron soil pipe from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on April 1, 2024 (89 FR 22448) and determined on July 5, 2024 that it would conduct expedited reviews (89 FR 68202, August 23, 2024).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on October 18, 2024. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5555 (October 2024), entitled                     *Cast Iron Soil Pipe from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-597 and 731-TA-1407 (Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: October 18, 2024.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-24637 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10647]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members should heed the gavel.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

[ITXC logo]

                                                              October 26, 2001


Edward B. Jordan
Chief Financial Officer
ITXC Corp.
750 College Road East
Princeton, New Jersey 08540

Dear Ed:


This letter amendment is to document an offer I made to the Board of Directors
of ITXC Corp. (the "Company") and which they accepted. The purpose of this
proposal is to allow me to demonstrate to employees the depth of my commitment
to the Q1 2002 EBITDA goal and my confidence that we can attain it. I therefore
am willing to forgo my salary during the first quarter if we don't meet that
goal. I have not asked for nor would I accept any alternative or extra
remuneration of any kind for this action.

The mechanism is to amend the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
dated as of February 1, 2000 between the Company and myself (the "Agreement")
solely with respect to amounts to be paid to me for services rendered during the
first calendar quarter of the year 2002 ("1Q2002"). Except as specifically
modified stated herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full
force and effect and, except as otherwise defined herein, all terms defined in
the Agreement shall have the same meaning in this letter.

I volunteer irrevocably that the Base Salary payable to me under Section 2.01(a)
of the Agreement for services rendered during 1Q2002 shall be reduced to one
dollar ($1.00) per month unless the Company shall report that the Company is
EBITDA positive for the 1Q2002 reporting period in accordance with its normal
accounting practices. In the event that the Company is EBITDA positive for that
period, I will be paid in full, retroactively, the Base Salary to which I would
otherwise have been entitled for 1Q2002 in the absence of the letter amendment.
Notwithstanding the above, the retroactive amount paid to me shall in no case
exceed that amount which would enable to the Company to remain EBITDA positive
for 1Q2002 after the retroactive payment. Similarly, no bonus payment will be
made to me attributable to 1Q2002, except to the extent that the Company is
EBITDA positive for 1Q2002 after such payment.

Subsequent to the completion of any payments relating to 1Q2002, this letter
amendment shall be of no further force and effect.



                                            Sincerely yours,

                                            /s/ Tom Evslin
                                            --------------------------
                                               Tom Evslin



ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
ITXC Corp.


By:   /s/ Edward B. Jordan
      ----------------------------
         Edward B. Jordan
         Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ David WeinbergDavid WeinbergChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                                  E-MEDSOFT.COM
                        200 Brickstone Square, Suite 403
                          Andover, Massachusetts 01810



                                             October 18, 2001



Mr. Stephen Savitsky
Mr. David Savitsky
Mr. Dale R. Clift
c/o Tender Loving Care Health
         Care Services, Inc.
1983 Marcus Avenue
Lake Success, New York  11042

Gentlemen:

                  We refer to (i) the Employment Agreements, each dated as of
the date hereof (collectively, the "Employment Agreements"), between Tender
Loving Care Health Care Services, Inc. ("Company") and Stephen Savitsky, David
Savitsky and Dale R. Clift, respectively, and (ii) the Agreement, dated the date
hereof, by and among Company, Stephen Savitsky, David Savitsky and Dale R. Clift
(the "Additional Payment Agreement").

                  E-MedSoft.com hereby guarantees the payment by Company to
Stephen Savitsky, David Savitsky and Dale R. Clift of (i) their respective
"Signing Bonus" (as such term is defined in the Employment Agreements) payable
by Company to each such person and (ii) the amounts payable by Company to each
such person under the Additional Payment Agreement. E-MedSoft.com shall make
such payments to such persons directly or shall contribute such amounts to
Company and cause Company to make such payments to such persons when due.

                                E-MEDSOFT.COM



                                By:  /s/ Frank Magliochetti
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                         Frank Magliochetti
                                         President and Co-Chief
                                         Executive Officer
# 9-.:J 

# :c m 

# C) 

# > ::::0 

# -C.**~.-71 ~..,:c;**  

# 0 ""' 

# = 

# - ...,. {A

# sC) l Aviation Plaza Jamaica, 

### NY l-1434 Gene Harrison- 2013EA700064 Subject Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty Resnonse Attachment In reply to your Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty, 

### I elect to proceed 

### as indicated 

### by my check mark beside the numbered paragraph below: 

## LU I hereby subtnit the amount ofthe proposed civil penalty with the understanding that an OrderAssessing Civil Penalty will be issued inthat amount. I hereby request aformal hearing in accordance with Section 13,16 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations. 

### By sending 

### this form to the Federal Aviation Administration, Eastern Region, I also hereby certify that a copy of this 

### form has been 

### filed with the Hearing Docket Clerk (Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 924A, Washington, DC 20591,**Attention~** 

### Hearing Docket Oerk).

-MY ATIORNEVIREPRESF.NTATIVE



### Name: Firm: Address:-------- 

### Phone No.--------



### PRIV ACV ACTNOTICE 

### This notice is provided in accordance 

### with Section (e)(3) of the Privacy Act. 5 U.S_C. §552a(e)(3), 

### and concerns the infonnation requested in the letter orform with which this Noticeis enclosed. A. 

# J1 ' 

# rn B. 

# C' ·' c.


# CJ Authoritv. This information is solicited pursuant to 49 U.S.C 1101**~ ~.,**  and regulations issued thereunder codified 

### in Part 13 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Submission of the telephone number is voluntary. The request for information is intended to provide you with an opportunity to participate in the investigation. Princina! Pumose. The requested information is intended to assist us in contacting you regarding this enforcement case. Routine Uses. Records from this system of records may be disclosed in accordance with the routine uses as they appear in System ofRecords No. DOT

### IF AA 847 as published from time to time in the Federal Register.



### 7
/

# / (

### ]~11, 

## 1962**Ceuibv~tlvvL~of car~waUam/llar~**  

# Sr. Novem:be.Y 7, 2012



# Sat:unu"y N·ave<**Wrt~** 

# 17,

. 2

# )~;;;;.--**~~**

'Dr. L. 'D.**W~ P'~cw,**  

## lDffic.«xi;'IA'\ff, f>e;vihuvPrcnpev(;(;y Wonhtp**C~** 

# d/1'\ UJ I 

# f\1M\IV6--&J l(/;)7&-

# r;pf ;J=.**~** 

# rD 

# rJOf 

# Do T!l-6 uNfV/f!:tl;ilJ 

# · s- WI\S 

# noT

# 1~rrfP 

# 16 

# S'twBt-**fl(lf~ufPJ**
#### BERRY GODWIN v. WILMINGTON AND WELDON RAILROAD COMPANY.

*Measure of Damages*— Judge’s *Charge.*

In an action against a railway company for negligently killing a cow, where there was no testimony as to the value of the dead body, it was not error in the Court to instruct the jury that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, as damages, the value of the cow alive, less the sum he had received for its hide, notwithstanding he had been notified by the defendant to remove the carcass.

*147Civil actioN, tried before *Graves, J.,*at Spring Term, 1889, of Johnston Superior Court.

.This action commenced before a Justice of the Peace, to recover damages for killing plaintiff’s cow. The Justice gave judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appealed to the Superior Court, where the following issues were submitted to a jury:

1. Was plaintiff’s cow. killed by the negligence of the defendant company? Answer: Yes.

2. What is the value of the cow? Answer: $48.50.

Thereupon the Court gave judgment for the amount, and interest and costs, and the defendant appealed.

On the trial the plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that he was the owner of the cow, and its value was $50, and that it was killed by the negligence of the defendant.

It appeared in evidence that the cow was about six years old, and in good order, with a calf six months old; that plaintiff had been paid $1.50 for the hide, and had been notified to remove the carcass from the defendant’s right of way, and this was the only evidence in regard to the value of the carcass.

There were no written prayers for instruction. There was no exception to any part of the instruction given, except that part which related to the measure of damages. Upon that question the Court instructed the jury that, if it should be found that plaintiff was entitled to recover, the measure of damages was the value of the cow, less the $1.50 he had received for the hide. To this the defendant excepted.

No counsel for the plaintiff.

*Mr. A. W. Haywood,*for the defendant.

Smith, C. J.

The direction given to the jury in measuring the damages was, of course, based upon the evidence before the jury, and we do not well see how it could have been otherwise. There was no proof of the value of the dead *148body of the animal, or that it was of any value beyond the price paid for the hide, or could have been put to any profitable use. The ruling is not at variance with that made in the case of *Roberts*v. *Railroad,*88 N. C., 560. There, the proof from the owner of the dead cow was that her body was worth from $18 to $20, and the jury was instructed that this was a proper deduction from the value of the living cow, and the same principle, upon the proofs, is enunciated in the present case. Besides, there was no exception to the charge, except in this particular, and no specific instruction was asked, so far as the record discloses, on the point. *Willey*v. *Railroad,*96 N. C., 408.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 160 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10693]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 OMISSION FROM THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD OF MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2008, 
                             AT PAGE H10640

                                 ______
                                 

                            LEAVE OF ABSENCE

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted to:
  Mr. Culberson (at the request of Mr. Boehner) for today until 8:48 
a.m. on account of official business.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

The Board of DirectorsAlbany Molecular Research, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (No. 333-80477 and No. 333-91423)on Form S-8 of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. of our reportsdated March 3, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet ofAlbany Molecular Research, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equityand comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended, and therelated financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005, annual report on Form 10-Kof Albany Molecular Research, Inc. and subsidiaries.

/s/ KPMG LLPAlbany, New YorkMarch 14, 2006

----
1 The Honorable James B. Loken stepped down as Ch ief Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the close of business on March 31, 2010. He has been succeeded by the Honorable William Jay Riley.
2The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-2578

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Jesus Cortez, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 8, 2010 Filed: April 6, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, 1 Chief Judge, GRUENDER and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jesus Medina Cortez appeals the below- guidelines sentence the district court 2 imposed after he pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute five or more kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846.-2- After calculating a guidelines range of 97 to 120 months, the court granted a government motion for a downward departure based on substantial assistance, and sentenced Cortez to 60 months’ imprisonmen t. Under the plea agreement, Cortez waived his right to appeal unle ss the sentence exceeded 135 months. Cortez challenges neither the validity nor th e scope of his waiver. He also does not allege that imposition of the sentence is a miscarriage of justice. He instead argues his sentence is unreasonable. This court will not, however, review his reasonableness claim. See United States v. Sisco , 576 F.3d 791, 795-96 (8th Cir. 2009) (a waiver of appeal is enforceable where the appeal is within the scope of the waiver, the waiver was knowing and voluntary, and enforcemen t would not result in a miscarriage of justice). Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, this court affirms the judgment of the district court.

______________________________