alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Subsidiaries                                                           Jurisdiction
------------                                                           ------------
<C>                                                                    <S>
1.  B.N. Technology, Inc. dba ICOM                                      California
2.  Digiweb, Inc.                                                       Maryland
3.  Interliant Consulting and Professional Services, Inc.               Massachusetts
    (formerly Net Daemons Associates, Inc.)
       reSOURCE PARTNER, INC.                                           Delaware
            rSP Insurance Agency, Inc.                                  Ohio
       Soft Link Holding Corp.                                          Delaware
            Soft Link, Inc.                                             Minnesota
4.  Interliant International, Inc.                                      Delaware
    (formerly Interliant of Texas, Inc.)
       Interliant Europe B.V.                                           The Netherlands
5.  Sage Networks Acquisition Corp.                                     Delaware
6.  Sales Technology Limited                                            England
       Sales Success Limited                                            England
7.  Telephonetics, Inc.                                                 Delaware
8.  The Jacobson Consulting Group, Inc.                                 Delaware
9.  Triumph Development, Inc.                                           Delaware
10. Triumph Technology, Inc.                                            Delaware
11. Web Provider, Inc.                                                  Maryland
</TABLE>
No. 44—2314.

#### David W. Kean v. J. Fred Hammerly.

Case originated in justice’s court, shows a meritorious cause of action in favor of appellee, to which no defense was established-Affirmed.

Judge below, Kirk Hawes.

Attorneys, for appellant, Mr. A. A. Exline ;

for appellee, Messrs. C. & W. L. De Wolf.

Opinion filed April 28, 1886.

Opinion Per Curiam.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25218]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Intent To Grant a Partially Exclusive License; 
BrandRank.AI

AGENCY: National Security Agency (NSA), Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NSA hereby gives notice of its intent to grant 
BrandRank.AI a revocable, non-assignable, partially exclusive, license 
to practice the following Government-Owned invention as described and 
claimed in United States Patent Number, 8,799,339 Device for and Method 
of Measuring Similarity Between Sets.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has until 
November 14, 2024 to file written objections including evidence and 
argument that establish that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 United States Code (U.S.C.) 209 
and 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 404.7.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the National 
Security Agency Technology Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 
6843, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6843.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen D. Presley, Director, Technology 
Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6843, Fort George G. Meade, 
MD 20755-6843, telephone (443) 634-3519.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The prospective partially exclusive license 
will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 
404.7. The patent rights in these inventions have been assigned to the 
United States Government as represented by the NSA.

    Dated: October 25, 2024.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-25218 Filed 10-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
#### M. J. Farrell, Plaintiff, v. City of Muscatine, Defendant.

Appeal: notice: record: jurisdiction.

*Appeal from Muscatine District Coiwt.*— Hon. C: M. Waterman, Judge.

Saturday, May 28, 1892.

Action to recover damage's alleged to have heen done to the plaintiff’s property hy defendant filling up one of its streets. Trial to a jury, and, on motion of the defendant, the jury were instructed to return a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was entered against the *plaintiff.*

Dismissed.

*Rickman <f Burle*and *E. E. Rickman,*for appellant.

*J. R. Manley,*for appellee.

Given, J.

The case is submitted upon an abstract filed hy the plaintiff and upon printed arguments from both parties. There is nothing whatever in the abstract or arguments to show that any appeal was ever taken in this case. The abstract commences by setting out the petition, and concludes with an assignment of errors, immediately preceding which it shows that judgment was entered upon the verdict against the plaintiff, to which he excepted, and that “all of the foregoing exceptions are shown by the record in said cause, and also evidenced by a bill of exceptions filed April 18, 1890.” The ease is entitled “M. J. Farrell, Appellant,” but there is nothing to show that he ever took an appeal. It is true that the appellee appears and does not question but that an appeal was taken. “But appearance does not confer jurisdiction upon an appellate court. In the absence of an appeal, the appellate court lacks more than jurisdiction of the person of the appellee.” *Plummer v. Bank,*73 Iowa, 752; First *Nat. Bank v. City Council, ante,*p. 730. In that case, as in this, the abstract did not show that an appeal had been taken. It is there further said: “This court cannot take jurisdiction of a case, unless our jurisdiction appears affirmatively from the record. * * * If the abstract does not show that we have jurisdiction, we can do nothing but dismiss the ease.” Following the conclusion announced in that case, this must be dismissed.
|   | **Exhibit 10.** |
|--------|-----------------|

 

 

**AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER**

**OF**

**ING INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA**

**INTO**

**ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY**

 

**AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER**, dated as of September 30, 2005 (the “Agreement”), by and between ING Insurance Company of America (“IICA”), a Florida stock life insurance company having its principal office at 2202 North Westshore Boulevard, Tampa, Florida 33607, and ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (“ILIAC”), a Connecticut stock life insurance company having its principal office at 151 Farmington Avenue, Hartford, Connecticut  06156.

 

|   | **WHEREAS**, IICA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ILIAC; and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**WHEREAS**, the respective Boards of Directors of IICA and ILIAC have determined that it is advisable that IICA be merged with and into ILIAC on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the laws of the States of Florida and Connecticut (the “Merger”);

 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the mutual agreements, covenants and provisions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

 

**ARTICLE  I**

**THE MERGER**

 

Section 1.1.  The Merger.  At the Effective Time (as hereinafter defined), IICA will be statutorily merged with and into ILIAC pursuant to Section 33-815 of the Connecticut General Statutes (the “CGS”) and Section 607.1101 of the Florida Statutes (the “FS”) and the separate corporate existence of IICA shall cease.  ILIAC as it exists from and after the Effective Time is sometimes referred to as the “Surviving Corporation.”  

 

Section 1.2.  Effective Time of the Merger.  Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, (a) a Certificate of Merger shall be duly prepared, executed and acknowledged by IICA and ILIAC and shall be filed with the Secretary of the State of the State of Connecticut and (b) Articles of Merger shall be duly prepared, executed and acknowledged by IICA and ILIAC and shall be filed with the Department of State of the State of Florida.  The Merger shall become effective upon the later to occur of (a) December 31, 2005, (b) the filing of such Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of the State of Connecticut, and (c) the filing of such Articles of Merger with the Department of State of Florida; provided that the Certificate of Merger and the Articles of Merger have been submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of the ConnecticutInsurance Department and the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation,respectively, prior to such filing.  The date when the Merger shall become effective is hereinafter referred to as the “Effective Time.” 

 

1

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.5

         This certificate also evidences and entitles the holder hereof to
certain Rights as set forth in a Rights Agreement, between the Corporation and
U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation, dated as of November 5, 2001, as it may be
amended (the "Rights Agreement"), the terms of which are hereby incorporated
herein by reference and a copy of which is on file at the principal executive
offices of the Corporation. Under certain circumstances, as set forth in the
Rights Agreement, such Rights will be evidenced by separate certificates and
will no longer be evidenced by this certificate. The Corporation will mail to
the holder of this certificate a copy of the Rights Agreement without charge
after receipt of a written request therefor. As described in the Rights
Agreement, Rights issued to or acquired by any Acquiring Person or any Affiliate
or Associate thereof (each as defined in the Rights Agreement), whether
currently held by or on behalf of such Person or by any subsequent holder,
shall, under certain circumstances, become null and void.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 460

To designate the United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan

Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the ‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United

States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mr. LUGAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 401

South Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the

‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT K. RODIBAUGH

4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTHOUSE.

5 The United States courthouse located at 401 South

6 Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, shall be known

7 and designated as the ‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United

8 States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.
2

•S 460 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United

6 States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

Æ
---

**EXHIBIT 12.2**

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Martin Tutschek, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Forum National
  Investments Ltd.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
  untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
  to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
  as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
  that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
  during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
  period covered by this annual report based on such evaluations; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
  by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
  materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting:
  and

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
  based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
  of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
  or operation of internal control of financial reporting which are reasonably
  likely to affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
  report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
  or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
  controls over financial reporting;

|Date: December 22, 2006                                     | /s/
      *Martin Tutschek*
|----------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------
|Martin Tutschek, Chief Financial Officer
      and Director



---
---

Exhibit 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Forum National Investments
  Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2002
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: December 22, 2006 | By                                                        | /s/
      *Daniel Clozza*
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------
|                         | Daniel Clozza, Chief Executive Officer
      and Director



---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Dectron Internationale Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mauro Parissi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Mauro Parissi
-------------------------
Mauro Parissi
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 1, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Dectron Internationale Inc. and will be retained by Dectron
Internationale Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25333]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; NIAAA Special Emphasis Panel for 
Member Conflict Applications.
    Date: November 19, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institute of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Luis Espinoza, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer. 
Extramural Project Review Branch. Office of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, Room 2109, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-8599, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#096c7a7960676673686568496468606527676061276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d180e0d141312071c111c3d101c141153131415531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.273, 
Alcohol Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 25, 2024.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-25333 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.H.2
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
EL PASO CORPORATION
SENIOR EXECUTIVE SURVIVOR
BENEFIT PLAN
  WHEREAS,
 NOW THEREFORE,
  3.1 Participation in the Plan
   4.1 Pre-Retirement Survivors Benefit




---



##### 



(a)
    
    the amount necessary to pay (i) two and one-half times the
Participants Annual Salary less (ii) the amount of any Cash-Out that the
Participant previously received (as described in Section 4.2), and less (iii)
$50,000, which may be paid as a group life insurance benefit;(b)
    
    divided by thirty.
   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, st
 EL PASO CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ David E. ZerhusenDavid E. ZerhusenIts Executive Vice President
Administration ATTEST:By:
    
    /s/ David L. Siddall

Corporate Secretary
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2420

RONALD L. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARMY BOARD OF CORRECTIONS OF MILITARY RECORDS; LOREN G. HARRELL, Executive Director, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-624-A) Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 19, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Ronald L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronald L. Davis appeals the district court’s order granting the Army Board for Correction of Military Records’ (ABCMR) motion for summary judgment in Davis’ action challenging the Board’s refusal to correct his records to reflect a medical, rather than an honorable, discharge. The district court's review of the ABCMR’s decision is quite limited, and such decisions can be set aside only “if they are arbitrary, capricious, or not based on substantial evidence.” Chappell v. Wallace , 462 U.S. 296, 303 (1983); see also Robbins v. United States , 29 Fed. Cl. 717, 725 (1993) (“The function of th[e] court is not to reweigh the evidence presented to the ABCMR. Rather, th[e] court is charged with determining whetherthe conclusion being reviewed is supported by substantial evidence.”) (internal citations omitted). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion, applying this standard, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Davis’ pending motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         104,792
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     44,252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,356
<PP&E>                                       6,560,944
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,021,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,182,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          963,041
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                        57,868
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,527,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,182,648
<SALES>                                        869,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               869,795
<CGS>                                        1,280,809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,280,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             226,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (634,821)                    
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (634,821)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>