alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 714

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to maintain exemption of

Alaska from dyeing requirements for exempt diesel fuel and kerosene.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to maintain

exemption of Alaska from dyeing requirements for exempt diesel fuel and kerosene.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (a) EXCEPTION TO DYEING REQUIREMENTS FOR EX4 EMPT DIESEL FUEL AND KEROSENE.—Paragraph (1) of

5 section 4082(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re6 lating to exception to dyeing requirements) is amended to

7 read as follows:

8 ‘‘(1) removed, entered, or sold in the State of

9 Alaska for ultimate sale or use in such State, and’’.
2

•S 714 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to fuel removed, entered,

3 or sold on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit  11 -  Statement  regarding  computation  of net income per common
               share and common share equivalent.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In thousands, except per share data)                     Three months ended     Six months ended
                                                            September, 30          September, 30
                                                                 1996                  1996
<S>                                                             <C>                 <C>  
          Average shares outstanding                               5,252               5,249
          Net effect of dilutive stock options, based
              on the treasury stock method                           118                 120

                                                                 =======             =======
          Total shares used in computation                         5,370               5,369
                                                                 =======             =======

          Net loss                                               ($  105)            ($   70)
                                                                 =======             =======

          Net loss per common share and
              common share equivalent                            ($ 0.02)            ($ 0.01)
                                                                 =======             =======
</TABLE>



                                       30
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25343]

[[Page 86903]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20674 and #20675; NEW YORK Disaster Number NY-
20018]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of New York

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New York 
(FEMA-4825-DR), dated September 24, 2024.
    Incident: Remnants of Tropical Storm Debby.

DATES: Issued on October 23, 2024.
    Incident Period: August 8, 2024 through August 10, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: November 25, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 24, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of New 
York, dated September 24, 2024, is hereby amended to include the 
following area as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary County:
    Chenango.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-25343 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARKONA, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Stephen L. Russo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Stephen L. Russo
----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         702,101
<SECURITIES>                                   902,889
<RECEIVABLES>                                  935,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                    62,748
<INVENTORY>                                     76,204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,566,855
<PP&E>                                         802,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                 747,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,009,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,147,325
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,982,842
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,120,709)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,009,458
<SALES>                                      6,745,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,745,279
<CGS>                                        1,063,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,368,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,833,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                570,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            570,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   570,034
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Humphreys

, Huff and Senior Judge Clements

AMERICAN HOSPICE MANAGEMENT

HOLDINGS, L.L.C. AND AMERICAN

HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY

MEMORANDUM OPINION *

v. Record No. 1851

- 11

- 2 PER CURIAM

JANUARY 24, 2012

JU LIA ANN PIGGOTT

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

( S. Vernon Priddy III; Two Rivers Law Group, P.C. , on brief), for

appellants.

( Vincent L. Robertson, Sr. , on brief), for appellee.

American Hospice Management Holdings, L.L.C. (h ereinafter referred to as employer)

appeal s a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission ordering the employer to

authorize surgery requested by Julia Ann Piggott (claimant)

. Employer contends the commission

erred by 1) ordering the authorization fo r the surgery, (2) rejecting employer ’ s argument that

claimant failed to prove the surgery was necessary and cau s ally related to h er awarded condition

of “strain

- lumbar,” and (3) by “expanding [claimant’s] compensable condition beyond the

awarded condition

. . . .”

We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final

opinion. See Piggot v. American Hospice Management Holdings, L.L. C.

, VWC File No.

232

- 30

- 16 (Aug. 15, 2011 ). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1

- 413, this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2

- facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1

- 403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.
#### THE STATE *v.*WASHINGTON PERRY.

Justices of the Peace have not *exclusive*jurisdiction of the offence of *receiving stolen goods under the value of five dollars;*but only jurisdiction *concurrent,*under certain circumstances, with that of the Superior Court.

*(The State*v. *Jerry Johnson, ante,*581, cited and approved.)

Indictment *for receiving stolen goods,*tried before *Watts, J.,*at Spring Term 1870 of Eeanklin Court.

The defendant was charged with having received ten pounds of bacon, of the value of six pence, knowing it to have been stolen: Having been convicted, upon motion the judgment was arrested for want of jurisdiction.

The Solicitor for the State appealed.

*Attorney-General,*for the State.

*Rogers & Batchelor, contra.*

Dick, J.

The question as to the extent of the jurisdiction of the Superior Courts and of Courts of Justices of the Peace in criminal matters, was fully considered and determined in the case of *State*v. *Jerry Johnson, ante,*581.

In certain offenses specified by statute, the party injured in person or property has an election to prosecute the offender in either of said Courts. A Justice of the Peace has not *599exclusive jurisdiction of the offence of receiving stolen goods under the value of five dollars. He may exercise such jurisdiction, and his action may be final, where the offense was committed in his township, and the party injured files a complaint within six months after the commission of the alleged offense.

In this case the Superior Court had jurisdiction, and the motion in arrest of judgment, ought not to have been sustained by his Honor.

There is error. Let this be certified, that the Court below may proceed to judgment.

Per Curiam. Error.
EXHIBIT 13.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Enacted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 First Energy Metals Limited (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 (the “Report”). I, Gurminder Sangha, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Gurminder SanghaGurminder Sangha Chief Executive Officer July 31, 2020


---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 158 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10129]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               ARMY SPC DANIEL AGAMI POST OFFICE BUILDING

  The bill (H.R. 6338) to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 4233 West Hillsboro Boulevard in Coconut 
Creek, Florida, as the ``Army SPC Daniel Agami Post Office Building,'' 
was ordered to a third reading, read the third time, and passed.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 537 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 537

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust the exemption 
 amounts used to calculate the individual alternative minimum tax for 
                         inflation since 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 1999

   Mr. Lugar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust the exemption 
 amounts used to calculate the individual alternative minimum tax for 
                         inflation since 1993.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FOR INDIVIDUAL AMT EXEMPTION AMOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 55(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to exemption amount) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(4) Inflation adjustment.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of any taxable year 
                beginning after 1998, each of the dollar amounts 
                contained in paragraphs (1) and (3) shall be increased 
                by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for such 
                        calendar year.
                    ``(B) Rounding.--If any increase determined under 
                subparagraph (A) is not a multiple of $50, such 
                increase shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of 
                $50.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 13.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Enacted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 First Energy Metals Limited (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 (the “Report”). I, Jurgen Wolf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/Jurgen WolfJurgen WolfChief Financial Officer July 31, 2019


---
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0074

_______________________________________________________________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRICE WILLIAM WILKE

Defendant and Appellant

_______________________________________________________________________

ORDER

_______________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause 

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that appellant is granted an extension of time to and 

include September 20, 2021, within which to prepare, file and serve, Appellant’s reply 

brief on appeal. 

No further extension of time will be granted. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 16 2021

08/16/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0074
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 524 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-146, K2025-144.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25288 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
''^:PARTMENTOF 

SERVED AUGUST 3, 2011 -Cyf f g^^ g 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ^^011 flUG - 3 P 2: l| I 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

M&R HELICOPTERS, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPIOSOOO1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMSNO. rAA-2010- 1211 

ORDER AS TO OFFERS AND/OR DISCUSSIONS TO COMPROMISE 

(SETTLEMENT) A MATTER 

"The public policy of favoring and encouraging settlement makes necessary the 

inadmissibility of settlement negotiations in order to foster frank discussions". 

(Fiberglass Insulators, Inc v Dupuy, ei al, (856 F. 2d 652, 26 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1225, 

] 988. Sec also Coakley & Williams Construction, Incorporated v Structural Concrete 

Equiprtient, Incorporated 973 F.2d 349, 1992; 2 McCormick on Evid. §266 (6"' cd.); 

Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.). Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of 

Evidence "...prohibits the admission of statements made in compromise negotiations..." 

{In the Matter of Africa Air Corporation, FAA Order No. 99-5). "Rule 408's public 

policy purpose of encouraging frank settlement discussions is as compelling in FAA civil 

penalty proceedings as it is in Federal Trials. Hence, its guidance will be followed in 

these proceeds." (Id.) 

WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED, the introduction of evidence of 

settlement negotiations will be excluded from these proceedings. 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CPlOSOOOl ] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

REVISED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Michael Selig, MD, FACC, CFI-H, 

Respondent's Representative 

2816 Orefield Road 

Allentown, PA 18104 

TEL: 610-360-3953 

FAX: 

Charles Raley, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Enforcement Division/AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W: 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-3357 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue 

East Building Ground Floor, Room EI2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use llic following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue. S.W.. Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington. 

DC 20591; Altenlion: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### T. J. MAXWELL, Adm’r. *v.*ROBERT HIPP, and another.

A bond for money for the hire of a slave for 1865, given January 2d 1865, is subject to be *scaled*according to the value of the hire for a year, in lawful money, and not according to the legislative table of the values of Confederate currency (acts of 1865-66, c. 39.)

*(Robeson*v. *Brown,*63 ST. C. 554, and *Garrett*v. *Smith, ante,*93, cited and approved.)

Debt, tried before Logan, *J.,*at January Special Term 1870, of Mecklenberg Court.

*99The plaintiff declared npon a bond oí the denfendant’s for $1010, payable to tbe plaintiff, and dated January 2d 1865. The plaintiff offered to prove that said bond was given for the hire of a negro man belonging to his intestate, for the year 1865, and that his hire was worth $50.

His Honor excluded the testimony.

Verdict for $7 70, of which $6 21 is principal money, &c., Rule, &e., Judgment, and Appeal by the plaintiff.

*Wilson*for the appellant.

*No*counsel, *contra.*

Dice;, J.

The bond declared on was executed during the late war, and there is a legal presumption that it was solvable in Confederate money.

The consideration of this bond was the services of a slave, which belonged to the estate of plaintiff’s intestate. The plaintiff ought to have been permitted to introduce evidence as to the value of such consideration, as that was the amount which he was entitled to recover. The legislative scale does not apply to this contract, as the consideration was not Confederate money: *Robeson*v. *Brown,*63 N. C. 554; *Garrett*v. *Smith,*at this term.

There was error in the ruling of his Honor.

Let this be certified.

Pee Otjeiam. *Venire de novo.*