alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925661
<NAME> ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,175
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,190)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. C2024-13; Presiding Officer's Ruling No. 3]


Complaint

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission is providing notice that a prehearing 
videoconference is being rescheduled. This notice informs the public of 
the videoconference rescheduled date and time.

DATES: Live WebEx Videoconference: October 30, 2024, at 10:00 p.m., 
eastern daylight time, virtual.

ADDRESSES: Submit notices of intervention electronically via the 
Commission's Filing Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Persons 
interested in intervening who cannot submit their views electronically 
should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 
202-789-6820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background
II. Ruling

I. Background

    Due to the inability of one of the participants to attend, the 
prehearing videoconference scheduled for Thursday, October 24, 2024 
must be rescheduled. The prehearing videoconference is hereby 
rescheduled for Wednesday, October 30, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.\1\ If either 
party seeks a continuance of the videoconference date or an extension 
of time to complete activities related to the videoconference, the 
parties must make a good faith effort to find a mutually agreeable new 
date before contacting the Presiding Officer to request a scheduling 
change. This ``good faith effort'' requires the requesting party to 
place at least one telephone call or send one email message to the 
other party.

II. Ruling

    1. The prehearing videoconference, scheduled for Thursday, October 
24, 2024, is hereby rescheduled to Wednesday, October 30, 2024, at 
10:00 a.m.
    2. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this ruling in 
the Federal Register.

Jennie L. Jbara,
Primary Certifying Official.
[FR Doc. 2024-25149 Filed 10-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
EXHIBIT 21.1 

 

**MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.**

 

**List of Subsidiaries**

 

1. Magma Design Automation K.K. (Japan) 

 

2. Magma Design Automation Ltd. (United Kingdom) 

 

3. Magma Design Automation Limited GmbH (Germany) 

 

4. Magma Design Automation Ltd. (Israel) 

 

5. Magma Design Automation BV (Netherlands) 

 

6. Magma Korea (Korea) 

 

7. Magma Design Automation NV (Belgium) 

 

8.Magma Design Automation Corp. (Canada) 

 

9. Moscape, Inc 

 

10. Magma Design Automation India Private Limited (India) 

 

11. Magma Taiwan Ltd. (Taiwan)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          35,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,785,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,505,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  9,110,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,919,000
<PP&E>                                       4,020,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,872,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,811,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,242,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,527,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,811,000
<SALES>                                      2,185,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,185,000
<CGS>                                        2,131,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,155,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             142,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,243,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,243,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $(.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $(.48)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 11.01
GORAN CAPITAL INC. - Consolidated
Analysis of Earnings Per Share
US GAAP - Treasury Method

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Three Months                   Three Months
                                                                     Ended                           Ended
                                                                 March 31, 1999                 March 31, 1998

<S>                                                                  <C>            (C)             <C>
Average Price (US $)                                                 $9.64          (A)             $28.76

Proceeds from Exercise of Warrants and Options
   (US $)                                                           $204,816        (B)          $9,582,503
                                                                     =======                      =========
Shares Repurchased - Treasury Method                                  21,251      (B)/(A)           333,189
                                                                      ======                        =======

Shares Outstanding - Weighted Average                              5,876,398                      5,798,750
Add:   Options and Warrants Outstanding(1)                            43,946                        576,304
Less:  Treasury Method - Shares Repurchased                          (21,251)                      (333,189)
                                                                   ---------                      ---------
Shares Outstanding for US GAAP Purposes                            5,899,093       (C)            6,041,865
                                                                   =========                      =========

Net Earnings in Accordance with US GAAP                           $2,168,000       (D)           $3,517,000
                                                                   =========                      =========
Earnings Per Share - US GAAP - Basic                                   $0.37                          $0.61
                                                                        ====                           ====
Earnings Per Share - US GAAP - Fully Diluted                           $0.37      (D)/(C)             $0.58
                                                                        ====                           ====
</TABLE>


Note 1: Only those options with a dilutive effect were  included  above for the
three months  ended  March 31,  1999.  Total  options  outstanding  amounted to
682,572, of which 638,626 options had exercise prices which exceeded $9.64.
#### JOHN W. PATRICK and FRANKLIN THOMAS vs. ELIAS CARR and HOOKERTON FEMALE INSTITUTE.

A Court-of Equity will not entertain a bill by a purchaser of ¡anil at execution sale, against the Sheriff, to compel him tooonvey.

lilis was a demurrer to a bill in tbe Court of Equity for Greene county. Tbe cause was removed to tbis Court for argument. Tbe object and allegations of tbe bill are stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court.

*Strong*for tbe defendants.

No counsel for tbe plaintiffs in tbis Court

PearsoN, C. J.

The demurrer raises the question, whether the jurisdiction of a Court of Equity can be invoked, to compel a Sheriff who has sold land under ’ an execution (tbe judgment and execution and ’ sale being in all respects regular) to execute a deed to tbe purchaser, who offers, and has always been ready to pay the purchase money ; in other words, to *compel*a *Sheriff*to *do Ms duty.,*This-has hitherto been considered tbe exclusive function of tbe Court, under whose authority be acted in making tbe sale. We are at a loss to conceive under what bead of *equity*tbis jurisdiction is supposed to be embraced, in tbe absence of an argument in support of .the equity of tbe bill, or of any reference to a precedent for the-exercise.of tbe jurisdiction. The purchaser has a plain, and an adequate, and .a speedy. remedy at law, by putting tbe Sheriff under a rule.

*88We can sec no special ground for tbe interference of tbis Court. It is true, the bill alleges, that after the sale, and in fraud of it, the execution continued to be issued, the Sheriff having made no return of the sale ; and thereupon a second sale was made by the new Sheriff, at which sale the old .Sheriff, one of the • defendants in this case, became the purchaser. But there is no allegation that a deed has been executed to the defendant, Carr, the old .Sheriff. We are inclined to the opinio'n that if a deed had been executed to him by the new Sheriff, in completion of the second sale, that would have “been a. ground for coming into this Court; for thereby the title would have passed to him as an *individual,*which might have rendered it impossible for him to comply with a rule of the Court'out of which the execution issued, to mate title, under his power .of sale as *.Sheriff,*to the *plaintiff;*and thereby made it necessary to convert him into a trustee, holding the legal title, on the ground that he had acquired it by fraud.

But there is no allegation that there was a deed to him. So, he has not acquired the legal title, and there, is no ground for equity, to assume jurisdiction, in order to convert him into a trustee.

Demurrer sustained, and hill dismissed with costs.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50163 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN JOSE MACIAS-CASTRO, also known as Rogelio Martinez-Lopez, also known as Martin Sotelo-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-97-CR-106-ALL-JN

-------------------- October 29, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Jose Macias-Castro, federal prisoner # 79463-080, appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of his sentence for illegal reentry into the United States after deportation. Macias-Castro asserts that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under Amendment 632, as that recent amendment to the sentencing guidelines retroactivelyNo. 02-50163 -2- applies to reduce U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2's enhancement for deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), a sentencing court may reduce a term of imprisonment “based on a sentencing range that has been subsequently lowered by the Sentencing Commission . . . , if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.” Section 3582(c)(2) applies only to amendments to the sentencing guidelines that operate retroactively, as set forth in subsection (c) of the applicable policy statement, U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, p.s. United States v. Drath , 89 F.3d 216, 217-18 (5th Cir. 1996)

. Amendment 632 is not listed in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c), p.s. Thus, an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction based on Amendment 632 would not be consistent with the Sentencing Commission’s policy statement. See Drath , 89 F.3d 218. Amendment 632 therefore cannot be given retroactive effect in the context of an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. See id. In light of the foregoing, t he district court lacked the authority to reduce Macias-Castro’s sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Lopez , 26 F.3d 512, 515 & n.3 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court’s order denying Macias-Castro’s motion for reduction of sentence is AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 7 OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 30th day of June, 2015, the 

cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

RAMIRO PAYAN, Appellant

No. 05-13-00533-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 7, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-0972851-Y.

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Lang and Schenck participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is MODIFIED

as follows:

(1) Punishment and Place of Confinement is modified from 

“2 YEARS INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, TDCJ,” to “180 DAYS STATE JAIL, 

PROBATED FOR 180 DAYS”; 

(2) “Attorney for State: Herschel Woods and Attorney for Defendant: Bill Rink” 

is modified to “Attorney for State: Jennifer Bennett and Attorney for Defendant: 

Juan Sanchez”; and 

(3) Degree of Offense is modified from “3RD DEGREE FELONY” to “STATE 

JAIL FELONY.” 

As REFORMED, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.
WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with 

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 9th day of September, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
Exhibit 23.1








INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT








We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statements of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form S-8 (File No. 333-164375 and 333-150912) of our report dated February 24, 2011, relating to the financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011.










/s/ Squar, Milner, Peterson, Miranda & Williamson, LLP





Newport Beach, California


February 24, 2011
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3111

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an extension of

time for the payment of estate tax to more estates with closely held

businesses.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. INOUYE (for himself and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

an extension of time for the payment of estate tax to

more estates with closely held businesses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN NUMBER OF ALLOWABLE PART4 NERS AND SHAREHOLDERS IN CLOSELY

5 HELD BUSINESSES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraphs (1)(B)(ii), (1)(C)(ii),

7 and (9)(B)(iii)(I) of section 6166(b) of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions and special
2

•S 3111 IS

1 rules) are each amended by striking ‘‘15’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘75’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to estates of decedents dying after

5 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                       SATELITES MEXICANOS, S.A. DE C.V.

     COMPUTATION OF EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
                          (IN THOUSANDS OF US DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                           ------------------------------------
                                                             2000        1999          1998
                                                           --------    --------    ------------
<S>                                                        <C>         <C>         <C>
EARNINGS:
Income (loss) before income tax, minority interest and
  extraordinary loss.....................................  $ 72,213    $(40,987)     $(17,206)
Add: Interest expense....................................    66,635      67,325        52,119
                                                           --------    --------      --------
  Earnings...............................................   138,848      26,338        34,910
                                                           --------    --------      --------
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense.........................................    66,635      67,325        52,119
Add: Capitalized interest................................                 1,560        20,500
                                                           --------    --------      --------
  Fixed charges..........................................    66,635      68,885        72,619
                                                           --------    --------      --------
Excess (deficiency) of earnings to cover fixed charges...  $ 72,213    $(42,547)     $(37,709)
                                                           ========    ========      ========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<MULTIPLIER> 1
        
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          21,627
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,627
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     37,683
<COMMON>                                        17,207
<OTHER-SE>                                     (55,430)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,627
<SALES>                                              0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0 
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               148,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (148,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (148,698)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.066)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.066)


        





</TABLE>