alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11


<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                              June 30,
                                                   -----------------------------

                                                       1997             1998
                                                   -----------      ------------
Computation Basic Earnings Per Share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
         Average share issued                         515,125           515,125
         Less:Average unallocated ESOP shares         (30,908)          (26,787)
         Less:Unearned MSBP shares                    (10,179)           (7,122)
         Less:Average Treasury shares                 (83,966)          (98,495)
                                                   -----------      -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding                   390,072           382,721
                                                   ==========       ===========

Computation Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Weighted average shares
  outstanding (per above basic EPS)                   390,072           382,721
         Plus:Dilutive effect of MSBP shares            1,434             1,288
         Plus:Dilutive effect of Stock options          9,314            11,929
                                                  -----------        ----------

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding           400,820           395,938
                                                  ============      ===========

Net earnings                                       $  130,517        $  107,810
                                                   ===========       ==========

Earning per share:
Basic                                            $    .33          $     .28
                                                 =============     =========

Diluted                                          $    .33          $     .27
                                                 =============     =========



Beginning  with the  completed  stock  offering  date of October 11,  1994,  the
Company  accounts for the 41,210 shares acquired by the Employee Stock Ownership
Plan ("ESOP") in accordance  with Statement of Position 93-6. In accordance with
this statement, shares controlled by the ESOP are not considered in the weighted
average shares outstanding until the shares are committed for allocation.
Exhibit 31.2  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, John A. Sindt, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 10, 2007/s/ John A. Sindt
John A. Sindt
Principal Financial Officer
State of Arkansas 

Jurisdiction: M ouata( n Vie Ill Cd'1 Type of levy: _ _!L.,o,ca.,I_,S"'al"'es'-'a"n"'duU,;;s,e_,_Ta,x;__ 

Enactment Date: ~'23~9, '! Ordinance No. _'b"--J1L~~3..,__ ___ Tax Rate: -=-'.::· 0=--

Purpose and Use of Tax: JYIU.Y\iCjpal sefVf(es 

Applicability ofT ax: General sales & use tax- Applies to all goods and services taxable under state law. 

Administrative Costs: 3% of gross collections withheld by the state for administration of the tax. 

Credits or Exemptions: Tax subject to same credits & exemptions available under state sales & use tax law 

Subsequent Amendments and Amendment Purpose: 

L Date: ---------- Amending Ordinance No.-----------

Purpose of Amendment: 

2. Date: ---------- Amending Ordinance No.-----------

Purpose of Amendment: 

3. Date: ---------- Amending Ordinance No.-----------

Purpose of Amendment: 

4. Date: ---------- Amending Ordinance No.-----------

Purpose of Amendment: 1 

Is the tax on aviation fuel distributed for airport related purposes: Yes or No 7 If No, state reason 

for belief that the tax is grandfathered. 

th~ oYJgfnal tu was not sub6tanh:;.t/lyeh.anaecl 

Sl nee 1fs enactMent 

The state of Arkansas administers local taxes for all cities and counties in this state and commits that the 

Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration will notify the FAA of any subsequent amendments 

to this tax that could affect grandfathered status. 

John H. Theis, Assistant Revenue Commissioner Date 
ORDINANCE NO.__§J;}_ ______ _ 

ANORO!NANCE LEVYING A ONE PERCENT(!%) SALES AND USE TAX 

WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, 

ARKANSAS. 

WHEREAS, the city of Mountain View currently has no city sales 

tax; and 

WHEREAS, the city of Mountain View wishes to adopt a one 

percent (1%) sales tax for the public welfare of the inhabitants 

of the city and to promote capital improvements of a public nature; 

THEREFORE, be it Ordained by the City Council of the city of 

Mountain View, Arkansas: 

Section I 

The city of Mountain View hereby levys a one percent (1%) 

sales and use tax to be applied within the corporate limits of 

the city of Mountain View. 

Section l I 

Said tax shall be levied on receipts from the sale at retail 

within said city of all items which are subject to taxation under 

the Arkansas Gross Receipts Tax Act of 1941, Act 386 of the 1941 

Acts of Arkansas, as said act has been hereto~ore or may be hereinafter amended. ~ 

Section III 

Said tax shall be levied and collected only to a maximum of 

twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) on each single transaction. 

Section IV 

That the prov1S1ons of this ordinance are separable and if a 

section, phrase, or provision shall be declared invalid such 

declaration shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the 

ordinance. 
Section V 

WHEREAS, there is a great need for a steady source of revenue to provide vital municipal services, it is hereby declared a 

emergency exists and this tax will take effect after its passage, approval, and. publication. 

Passed this 13th d-ay of February, 1987. · 

Attest: 

City Record r 

'1;.. 

.. 

'., :~
<PAGE>


Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Triton PCS, Inc.

The subsidiaries of Triton PCS, Inc. are as follows:

Triton PCS Holdings Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton PCS License Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton PCS Equipment Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton PCS Operating Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton PCS Property Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton Management Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Triton PCS Investment Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton PCS Finance Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84925-84926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4831-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Virginia; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-4831-DR), dated October 1, 2024, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 4, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby amended to include the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of October 1, 2024.


[[Page 84926]]


    Montgomery and Pulaski Counties for Individual Assistance 
(already designated for debris removal and emergency protective 
measures [Categories A and B], including direct federal assistance).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24690 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT (32)

                              THE BANC CORPORATION

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of The Banc
Corporation (the "Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in that Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: March 16, 2006                            /s/ C. Stanley Bailey
                                             -----------------------------
                                                   C. Stanley Bailey
                                                Chief Executive Officer



         This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any
other purpose.

<PAGE>

                              THE BANC CORPORATION

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of The Banc
Corporation (the "Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in that Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                                                  /s/ James C. Gossett
                                             ------------------------------
                                                    James C. Gossett
                                                Chief Accounting Officer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: March 16, 2006


         This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any
other purpose.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2009-1425 

 CORUS STAAL BV, 

 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 

 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

ARCELORMITTAL USA INC., 

 Defendant. 

Richard O. Cunningham, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, of Washington, DC, argued 

for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Joel D. Kaufman, Alice A. Kipel, and 

Jamie B. Beaber. 

Claudia Burke, Senior Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for 

defendants-appellees United States, et al. With her on the brief were Tony West, 

Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Patricia M. McCarthy, 

Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Sapna Sharma, Attorney, Office of the 

Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of 

Washington, DC. 

Ellen J. Schneider, Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of Washington, 

DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States Steel Corporation. On the brief were 

Robert E. Lighthizer, Jeffrey D. Gerrish and Luke A. Meisner. Of counsel was James C. 

Hecht. 

Appealed from: United States Court of International Trade 

Judge Judith M. Barzilay 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-1425 

CORUS STAAL BV, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

ARCELORMITTAL USA INC., 

 Defendant. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of International Trade 

in CASE NO(S). 07-00221 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (PROST and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and GUILFORD, District 

Judge*). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 

* Honorable Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, United Sates District Court for 

the Central District of California, sitting by designation. 
 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED April 8, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6066 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6066

**Commission Decision of 08/04/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6066 - KIA MOTORS EUROPE / KIA MOTOR SPA) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 08/04/2011

C(2011) 2615 final

PUBLIC VERSION

SIMPLIFIED MERGER PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6066 - KIA MOTORS EUROPE/ KIA MOTOR SPA Notification of 04.03.2011 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]

1. On 04.03.2011, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Kia Motors Europe GmbH ("KME", Germany), indirectly controlled by Hyundai Motor Company ("HMC", Korea), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation the wholesale distribution business of Kia vehicles and related spare parts in Italy ("the Business", Italy), currently controlled by Kia Motors Italia S.p.A. ("KMI", Italy), by way of purchase of shares. [2]

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for KME: distributor of Kia vehicles and spare parts in Europe;

- for HMC: global manufacturer of motor vehicles;

- for the Business: import and distribution of Kia vehicles and spare parts in Italy.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [3] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed)

Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 79 ; 12.03.2011, p.10

[3] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
Exhibit
32.01




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Central European Media Enterprises Ltd
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,
Adrian Sarbu, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, and Wallace
Macmillan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods explained in the
    report.








/s/  Adrian Sarbu
                /s/  Wallace
      MacmillanAdrian
      Sarbu
                Wallace
      MacmillanPresident
      and Chief Operating Officer
                Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
                (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)April 29,
      2009
                April 29,
      2009
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 574

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 1999

Referred to the Committee on Resources

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections

to a map relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 574 RFH

1 SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO MAP.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the

3 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

4 shall make such corrections to the map described in sub5 section (b) as are necessary to move on that map the

6 boundary of the otherwise protected area (as defined in

7 section 12 of the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of

8 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3503 note; Public Law 101–591)) to the

9 Cape Henlopen State Park boundary to the extent

10 necessary—

11 (1) to exclude from the otherwise protected area

12 the adjacent property leased, as of the date of enact13 ment of this Act, by the Barcroft Company and

14 Cape Shores Associates (which are privately held

15 corporations under the law of the State of Dela16 ware); and

17 (2) to include in the otherwise protected area

18 the northwestern corner of Cape Henlopen State

19 Park seaward of the Lewes and Rehoboth Canal.

20 (b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map described in this

21 subsection is the map that is included in a set of maps

22 entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’, dated Octo23 ber 24, 1990, as revised October 15, 1992, and that re-
3

S 574 RFH

1 lates to the unit of the Coastal Barrier Resources System

2 entitled ‘‘Cape Henlopen Unit DE–03P’’.

Passed the Senate April 22, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40764 c/w 97-41251

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD W. MELANCON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No.1:96-CR-130-1 and 1:96-CR-131-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Richard W. Melancon appeals his sentences after pleading

guilty to two separate indictments charging him with counterfeiting

federal reserve notes and possession with intent to distribute

cocaine and/or cocaine base. He argues that the district court

erred in denying his objection to the two-level increase in his

offense level for obstruction of justice and in denying a threelevel decrease in his offense level for acceptance of

responsibility. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's rulings and find no clear error in the district court’s
findings. United States v. Storm, 36 F.3d 1289, 1295 (5th Cir.

1994); United States v. Spires, 79 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir. 1996).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM.