alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-Q/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended October 1, 2006
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission File Number 0-24548
 Movie Gallery, Inc.
  DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation or organization)
    
    63-1120122
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)900 West Main Street, Dothan, Alabama
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    36301
(zip code)
 
 
  þ o
  o þ o
 o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 5. Other InformationItem 6. ExhibitsSignaturesEX-10.1 EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTEX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CEOEX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CFOEX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CEOEX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO    Table of Contents  Explanatory Note
  
 Item 5. Other Information
     
 Item 6. Exhibits
  10.1
    
    Executive Employment Agreement between Movie Gallery US, LLC and Keith
A. Cousins dated August 23, 2006.31.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




---



##### Table of Contents



31.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.32.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C Section
1350.32.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C Section
1350.
 
   Movie Gallery, Inc.(Registrant)Date:  March 13, 2007
    /s/ Thomas D. Johnson, Jr.Thomas D. Johnson, Jr.,Senior Vice President and Interim
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          70,086
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                       251
<INVENTORY>                                      1,568
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,634
<PP&E>                                           2,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                     700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,481
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,049
<SALES>                                         42,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,351
<CGS>                                           10,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,091
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,587
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,881
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,881
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06


</TABLE>
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
  





 
  
 TERMINATION ADDENDUM 

to the 
 AUTOMOBILE QUOTA SHARE
REINSURANCE CONTRACT 
 Effective: December 31, 2013 

(the “Contract”) 

issued to 
 AFFIRMATIVE
INSURANCE COMPANY 
 Burr Ridge, Illinois 

(the “Company”) 
 by

 THE SUBSCRIBING REINSURER(S) IDENTIFIED 

IN THE INTERESTS AND LIABILITIES AGREEMENT(S) 

ATTACHED TO AND FORMING PART OF THE CONTRACT 

Effective June 30, 2014, paragraph A of Article 2—Term (as previously amended by Addendum No. 1 and Addendum No. 2 to the
Contract)—is amended to read: 
  

	A.	This Contract shall take effect on December 31, 2013 and shall remain in effect through June 30, 2014, both days inclusive, applying to losses commencing during the term of this Contract. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Termination Addendum to be executed by its duly authorized representative as follows: 

 

													
	on this 	 	  6th  	 	 day of 	 	  August  	 	, in the year 	 	  2014  	 	.

 AFFIRMATIVE INSURANCE COMPANY 

/s/ Michael J. McClure 

 

  

					
	Effective: December 31, 2013	  		  	DOC: August 5, 2014
	U4VT0008	  	1 of 1	  	Termination Addendum
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q/A of Security Bank Corporation (the Company) for the period ending
June 30, 2000 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), H. Averett Walker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. McLemore, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ H. Averett WalkerH. AVERETT WALKERChief Executive OfficerMay 22, 2006/s/ James R. McLemoreJAMES R. McLEMOREChief Financial and Accounting OfficerMay 22, 2006


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**KEVIN J. KAYLOR,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 25 MM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 20th day of April, 2016, the Application for L eave to File Original** 

**Process is** GRANTED **, and the “King’s Bench Power Declaration” is** DENIED

**.**
#### State, Respondent, vs. Robbins, Appellant.

*January 10*

April *18, 1941.*

*595For the appellant there was a brief by *Lecher, Michael, Whyte & Spohn,*attorneys, and *John S. Best*and *Irving P. Mehigan*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Best, Mr. Mehigan,*and *Mr. Malcolm K. Whyte.*

For the respondent there were briefs by the *Attorney General, William A. Plats,*assistant attorney general, *Herbert J. Steffes,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, and *Gene L. Green,*assistant district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Plats*and *Mr. Green.*

Per Curiam.

This appeal involves the constitutionality of sec. 101.40, Stats. Mr. Justice Fowler, Mr. Justice Fritz, Mr. Justice Fairchild, and Mr. Justice Martin are of the opinion that sec. 101.40 is unconstitutional and void. Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry and Mr. Justice Wickhem are of the view that the law is constitutional and valid. Since prior to the preparation of a formal opinion in the matter it has come to the attention of the court that the legislature has repealed sec. 101.40, it is considered unnecessary and inadvisable to give an extended statement of the conflicting views of the court concerning the validity of this law.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to discharge the defendant.
#### Ransom Cloud, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

[Byron B. Bower, the present Solicitor General of the Albany Circuit, having been of counsel for the plaintiff in error in this ease before his appointment, the Attorney General was directed by the Governor to represent the State.]

1. Where service of the bill of exceptions is made by a party or his attorney, such service must be authenticated by the affidavit of the person perfecting the same, on the original bill of exceptions, or attached thereto. (R.)

2. Where service of the bill of exceptions is made by a sheriff or a constable, the entry thereof by such officer on the original is sufficient evidence of the fact. (R.)

3. Service of the bill of exceptions, by leaving a copy thereof at the office of counsel for defendant in error, is insufficient. (R.)

Bill of exceptions. Service. Practice in tbe Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court. July Term, 1873.

When this case was called, the Attorney General moved to dismiss the writ of error upon the following grounds:

1st. Because the entry of service upon the original bill of exceptions is signed by the attorney of the plaintiff in error, and there is no affidavit authenticating the same.

2d. Because tbe aforesaid pretended service purports to have been perfected by leaving a copy of tbe bill of exceptions at the office of the Solicitor General.

The only evidence of service upon the bill of exceptions was the following entry:

*“*Served the Solicitor General with a copy of this bill of exceptions by leaving the same at his office. January 31st, 1873. (Signed) O. G. Gurley,

*“*Attorney for defendant.’

Tbe Court sustained the motion and dismissed the writ of error, enunciating the principles contained in the preceding head-notes.

N. J. Hammond, Attorney General, for the motion,

cited Code, sec. 4199; Coleman *vs.*Ransom & Co., 45 Ga. R., *370316; Baber *vs.*M. *&*B. R. R. Co., 42 Ga. R., 300. As to return by attorney: Clark *vs.*Lyon *et al.,*decided January term, 1873.

Gurley & Russell *;*Bower & Bower, *contra.*
Exhibit
13.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Liza Ohayon certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | This Annual Report on Form 20-F of Eviation Ltd. (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  May
    16, 2017 | /s/
    Liza Ohayon        
|----------------------- | ---------------------------
|                        | Liza
    Ohayon            
|                        | Chief
    Financial Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 563

To repeal a waiver that permitted the issuance of a certificate of documentation with endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the

vessel COLUMBUS, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 8, 1999

Mr. LEVIN (for himself and Mr. ABRAHAM) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To repeal a waiver that permitted the issuance of a certificate of documentation with endorsement for employment

in the coastwise trade for the vessel COLUMBUS, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF WAIVER.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 403 of the Coast Guard

5 Authorization Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–383) is

6 amended by striking subsection (e).

7 (b) ACTION BY THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPOR8 TATION.—If, before the date of enactment of this Act, the
2

•S 563 IS

1 Secretary of Transportation issued a certificate of docu2 mentation with endorsement for employment in the coast3 wise trade for the vessel COLUMBUS (United States offi4 cial number 590658) under section 403(e) of the Coast

5 Guard Authorization Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–

6 383)—

7 (1) that certificate shall be null and void; and

8 (2) the Secretary shall issue a revised certifi9 cate of documentation for that vessel that is consist10 ent with the limitations on the operation of that ves11 sel that applied to that vessel on the day before the

12 date of enactment of the Coast Guard Authorization

13 Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–383).

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925661
<NAME> PLASMATRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,087
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,308)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  58
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (58)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (58)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (58)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
14 CFR Part 39

[4910-13-PJ

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

003Q

(Docket No. FAA-2010-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-239-AD]

R1N 2120-AA64

Airwortbiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-1Al1 (eL-600),

CL-600-2AI2 (CL-60l), CL-600-2Bl6 (CL-60l-3A, CL-601-3R, and CL-604 Variant

(Including CL-605 Marketing Variant)) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

fftJlI1-IO \

• ,!AlSo'S",

NlTlAl,.SISI\;

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product

.~rr

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing ainvorthiness

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify NITlALSislG

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe TE

condition as:

Seven cases of on-ground hydraulic accwnulator screw cap or end cap

failure have been experienced on CL·600-2B19 (CRJ) aircraft, resulting in

loss of the associated hydraulic system and high-energy impact damage to

adjacent systems and structure. * * *

ITIAJ"S.':slli

* * * * * * *

NIl'IAL>IliIG

NITI"'-SlSIG
l.il)J(I-IJ-Pj

DEl'ARTM ENT OF TRANSPORTATlON ,',""-"""".,., '''v,',,,;;,·,'.',,.',

\"1~·171

!'cdcl'a! A\'iatiOll Ailministnlti(lll

1,1CFR Parl 39 /2 I,F }v(!'{

IDnckd No. FAA-2009-;'''''''*'''; Oil'ccloratc Itlcntificr 20f)~-Nr\.J-2J9-i\n]

H.1l\' 2120-AA64

''''''T~,T".·",,'',

,\:-;f:·17Il

.,.'/ '\'/ ..-(' "~r

""l' ,~,,'-,1",""."

.-\"E·171

;B:ttJe

".'" l.f

12.:l 0 '1

"·1';1:.1 <'"'c,

Airworthinc~.~ Directives; l3ombnrc!ier, Inc.lvhH.kl CIAiDO~lAII (Ct.-GOO),

AGENCY: Fedc.:ml /\via(ion Adminislra1ion (FAA), DOT.

cr AiOO-·1l\ 12 (CL-60 I), CL-WO-2B j 6 (CL-60 1-3i\. CL-60 I-3R, ,md CL-(-}()4 V;UiillliS

SU!\'I:\J!AH,Y: \Ve propose Iu lldopll1 new airworlhiness dircclivol.'\D) fll]' ill" products

ACTION: Nolicc or proposed ru!cmaking (1\lpRM).

(Including Cr.-60S Murk~ling Varianl)) Airplanes

condition ;L~:

lisled ;Ibovt~, This proposed /\1) results /i-o.m mandatory continuing (linv()!1hir:Il:'.;s

__ .i__ ~~. _

';iV' /1" e

llli'ol'matioll (MeAl) origin<1tcd by [In aviation :.lulhorily of another coHlllry It) iClcniJii>- f>t"'?lr;()';

"t;12- ' ~I", l

and correct an unsaFc conc!ilji)ll 011 an aViation pruduCI The IvlC/\1 descrihe:; Ille \ins;de I. z..";;@ y ",,,','",-""""1

----[----

Sc.;vcn eases oeon-ground hydraulic accumulator .~crC\V cap or end Ci1r

I;lilure have heen experienced on CL·600-2BJ () (CR.J) airCl'i)J1, resulting in

!()SSoflhe associated hydraulic system and high-energy impact danwge 10

;ldjacen{ Sp;IClllS <lnd struclUrc. >j< -.;.. *

, .&fr-

'" 'i I '

i,'v) J ~ I

;-;;;-_._-

t .

._---
<PAGE>


[LOGIX LETTERHEAD]

WILLIAM HOFFMAN, JR.
Vice President
Chief Operating Officer

13439 N. Broadway Extension
Oklahoma, City, OK 73114



October 22, 1998

Geoffrey Boyd
2609 Steeplechase
Edmond, OK 73034

Dear Geoffrey:

It is with great pleasure we offer you the position of Chief Financial 
Officer of Logix Communications Enterprises (aka Dobson Wireline Company). 
The initial salary will be payable at $5,208.34 (minus taxes) for 24 pay 
periods, which will be reviewed in June, 1999, with an expectation of a 
salary increase to $6,041.67 (minus taxes). In addition, you will receive 
variable compensation up to $7,812.50 (minus taxes) dependent on your 
performance as defined by set of objectives agreed to by you, Chip Hoffman, 
the business plan, and the Board of Directors. The bonus equal to 25% of your 
quarterly base salary will be paid quarterly, based upon the performance in 
the previous quarter. Upon acceptance of the CFO position, you will be 
awarded 210,000 options of the Wireline Co. (.28%) in addition to your 
current .22% of Dobson Communications Corporation. Each set of options will 
be governed by their respective Stock Option Plan. After one full year of 
service, you will be reviewed based upon the 100% attainment of MBO 
performance and as the board dictates, and if applicable will receive an 
additional 375,000 options on Wireline Stock. The company will also provide 
you initiation and monthly dues to Oak Tree Country Club (full membership). 
This letter does not constitute an offer for permanent employment for a 
specific period of time.

In the event that your employment with Logix is terminated by Logix, without 
cause, then your severance will be one years salary and (i) the right to 
continue your group health care coverage with Logix, at Logix's expense, for 
one (1) year after termination, (ii) full vesting of any stock options which 
would have vested through the passage of time by the end of the calendar year 
during which you were so terminated.

If the terms and conditions of this letter are satisfactory to you, please 
sign it, thereby signifying your acceptance and indicating the day you expect 
to begin employment. Then return this letter to the Human Resources 
Department, 13439 N. Broadway Extension, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73114. 
Logix Communications is looking forward to you becoming a part of our growing 
team. If you have any questions, please call me at (405) 391-8500.

Sincerely,

/s/ William J. Hoffman, Jr.

William J. Hoffman, Jr.
Chief Operating Officer


I accept employment with Logix Communications Corporation as set forth above 
and expect to start on   11/1/98  .
                       -----------

/s/ Geoffrey M. Boyd
----------------------
Signature
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 July 12, 2005 Before Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge No. 04-1197 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee ,

v. JEREMY FISH, Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. No. 03-CR-67 William C. Griesbach, Judge

. O R D E R This court ordered a limited remand so the district court could state on the record whether the sentence remains appropriate now that United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), has limited the Guidelines to advisory status. S ee United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005). The district judge has now replied that he would today impose the same sentence, knowing of the Guidelines’ advisory status. The range under the Guidelines is 37 to 46 months, and Fish’s sentence of 37 months is the lowest possible sentence. We do not see any reason why such a sentence would be deemed “unreasonable” in post- Booker practice. The judgment of the district court therefore is A FFIRMED

. UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53