Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 201 / Thursday, October 17, 2024 / Notices 83641 

1See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires 

from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 

23973 (April 5, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of 2022–2023 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated July 3, 2024. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2022– 

2023 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road 

Tires from India,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See Certain Now Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires 

from India: Antidumping Duly Order, 82 FR 12553 

(March 6, 2017) (Order). 

6For a full description of these changes, see 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

7With two respondents under examination, 

Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weightedaverage of the dumping margins calculated for the 

examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the 

dumping margins calculated for the examined 

respondents; and (C) a weighted-average of the 

dumping margins calculated for the examined 

respondents using each company’s publicly ranged 

U.S. sale quantities for the merchandise under 

consideration. Commerce then compares (B) and (C) 

to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as the most 

appropriate rate for all other producers and 

exporters. See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof 

from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order 

in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). 

See also Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the NonSelected Company Rate for the Final Results,’’ 

dated concurrently with this notice. 

8The exporters or producers not selected for 

individual review are listed in Appendix II. 

Dated: October 10, 2024. 

Scot Fullerton, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: Export Subsidy Adjustment 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–23987 Filed 10–16–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–869] 

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road 

Tires From India: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

certain producers/exporters subject to 

this administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR) 

March 1, 2022, through February 28, 

2023. 

DATES: Applicable October 17, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit 

Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6412. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 5, 2024, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results and 

invited comments from interested 

parties.1 On May 16, 2024, Titan Tire 

Corporation (the petitioner), ATC Tires 

Private Limited/ATC AP Tires Private 

Limited (collectively, ATC), Asian Tire 

Factory Ltd./Lyallpur Rubber Mills 

(collectively, ATF), and Balkrishna 

Industries Ltd. submitted timely-filed 

case briefs. On May 23, 2024, the 

petitioner, ATC, and ATF submitted 

timely-filed rebuttal briefs. On July 3, 

2024, Commerce extended the deadline 

for the final results until October 2, 

2024.2 On July 22, 2024, Commerce 

tolled certain deadlines in this 

administrative proceeding by seven 

days.3 The deadline for the final results 

is now October 9, 2024. For a complete 

description of the events that occurred 

since the Preliminary Results, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.4

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 5

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is certain new pneumatic off-the-road 

tires from India. For a full description 

of the scope of the Order, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in the appendix 

to this notice and addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made certain changes to the 

margin calculations for ATC and ATF.6

Rate for Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance for calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted-average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available. 

In this review, we calculated 

weighted-average dumping margins of 

2.62 percent and 2.76 percent for ATC 

and ATF, respectively, and we have 

assigned to the non-selected companies 

a rate of 2.63 percent, which is the 

weighted average of ATC and ATF’s 

margins, weighted by their publicly 

ranged U.S. sales values.7

Final Results of Review 

For these final results, we determine 

the following estimated weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period March 1, 2022, through February 

28, 2023: 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

ATC Tires Private Limited; ATC 

Tires AP Private Limited ......... 2.62 

Asian Tire Factory Ltd.; Lyallpur 

Rubber Mills ............................ 2.76 

Companies Not Selected for Individual Review 8 ..................... 2.63 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
83642 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 201 / Thursday, October 17, 2024 / Notices 

9See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

10See Order, 82 FR at 12554 (the dumping margin 

of 3.67 percent assigned to all other producers/ 

exporters was adjusted for export subsidies found 

in the companion countervailing duty investigation, 

resulting in an adjusted cash deposit rate of zero 

percent). 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for ATC and 

ATF in connection with these final 

results to interested parties within five 

days of any public announcement or, if 

there is no public announcement, 

within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

because ATC reported the entered value 

of its U.S. sales, we calculated importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment 

rates based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of the sales for which entered 

value was reported. ATF did not report 

the actual entered value for its U.S. 

sales; thus, we calculated importerspecific per-unit duty assessment rates 

by aggregating the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

examined sales and dividing this 

amount by the total quantity of those 

sales. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis within the meaning 

of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by ATC or ATF for which the reviewed 

companies did not know that the 

merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. 

For the companies listed in Appendix 

II which were not selected for 

individual review, we will assign an 

assessment rate based on the reviewspecific rate, calculated as noted in the 

‘‘Rate for Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination’’ section, above. 

The final results of this review shall be 

the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for the future 

deposits of estimated duties where 

applicable.9

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

covered in this review will be equal to 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

that is established in the final results of 

this review, except if the rate is less 

than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

companies not listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the cash 

deposit rate established for the most 

recently completed segment for the 

producer of the subject merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be zero percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.10

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties, and/or an increase in the amount 

of antidumping duties by the amount of 

the countervailing duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: October 9, 2024. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Correction of a Ministerial 

Error for ATC 

Comment 2: Application of the Export 

Subsidy Offset for ATC 

Comment 3: Status of ATC’s Startup 

Adjustment 

Comment 4: Treatment of Certain of ATC’s 

Reported Costs for Direct Materials and 

Duties 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Reconsider Its Differential Pricing 

Analysis for ATF 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Grant ATF an Export Subsidy Offset 

Comment 7: Whether an Adjustment for 

Duty Drawback or Certain Other 

Programs is Warranted for ATF 

Comment 8: Exclusion of Balakrishna 

Industries Ltd.’s Sales 

VI. Recommendation 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 201 / Thursday, October 17, 2024 / Notices 83643 

11Subject merchandise produced and exported by 

BKT was excluded from the Order. See Certain New 

Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India: Notice of 

Correction to Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 

25598 (June 2, 2017). Accordingly, BKT is only 

covered by this administrative review for subject 

merchandise produced in India where BKT acted as 

either the manufacturer or exporter (but not both). 

1See Notice of Antidumping Orders: Certain 

Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Brazil, 

the Republic of Korea (Korea), Mexico, and 

Venezuela, and Amendment to Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Circular 

Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 

49453 (November 2, 1992) (CWP Order); Certain Oil 

Country Tubular Goods from India, the Republic of 

Korea, Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, and the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty 

Orders; Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 

FR 53691 (September 10, 2014) (OCTG Order); 

Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea and 

the Republic of Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 

80 FR 75056 (December 1, 2015) (WLP Order); and 

Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of 

Korea: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping 

Determination and Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 

18767 (May 2, 2019) (LDWP Order) (collectively, the 

Orders). 

2See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from 

the Republic of Korea; Oil Country Tubular Goods 

from the Republic of Korea; Welded Line Pipe from 

the Republic of Korea; and Large Diameter Welded 

Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Initiation 

of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances 

Reviews, 89 FR 31726 (April 25, 2024). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review of Circular Welded 

Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea; 

Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the 

Republic of Korea; Welded Line Pipe from the 

Republic of Korea; and Large Diameter Welded Pipe 

from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

4See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France: Final Results of Changed-Circumstances 

Review, 75 FR 34688 (June 18, 2010), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 

(IDM) at Comment 1. 

5See, e.g., Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon 

from Norway; Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 64 FR 9979, 9979–80 (March 1, 1999). 

6 Id.; see also Brass Sheet and Strip from Canada; 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992), and 

accompanying IDM at Comment 1. 

Appendix II—Companies Not Selected 

for Individual Examination Receiving 

the Review-Specific Rate 

1. Apollo Tyres Ltd. 

2. Balkrishna Industries Ltd.11

3. CEAT Ltd. 

4. Emerald Resilient Tyre Manufacturer 

5. HRI Tires India 

6. JK Tyres and Industries Ltd. 

7. K.R.M. Tyres 

8. Mahansaria Tyres Private Limited 

9. MRF Limited 

10. MRL Tyres Limited (Malhotra Rubbers 

Ltd.) 

11. Speedways Rubber Company 

12. TVS Srichakra Limited 

[FR Doc. 2024–23915 Filed 10–16–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–809, A–580–870, A–580–876, A–580– 

897] 

Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe 

From the Republic of Korea; Certain 

Oil Country Tubular Goods From the 

Republic of Korea; Welded Line Pipe 

From the Republic of Korea; and Large 

Diameter Welded Pipe From the 

Republic of Korea: Notice of 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., 

Ltd. (HSP) is the successor-in-interest to 

Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai 

Steel) in the context of the antidumping 

duty (AD) orders on circular welded 

non-alloy steel pipe (CWP), certain oil 

country tubular goods (OCTG), welded 

line pipe (WLP), and large diameter 

welded pipe (LDWP) from the Republic 

of Korea (Korea). Therefore, HSP is 

entitled to Hyundai Steel’s AD cash 

deposit rate with respect to entries of 

the subject merchandise in the abovereferenced proceedings. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable October 17, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

George McMahon, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–1167. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 11, 2024, HSP requested 

that, pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

19 CFR 351.216, and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3), Commerce conduct a 

changed circumstances review (CCR) to 

determine that HSP is the successor-ininterest to Hyundai Steel and, 

accordingly, to assign HSP the cash 

deposit rates currently applicable to 

Hyundai Steel pursuant to the CWP 

Order; OCTG Order; Welded Line Pipe 

Order; and LDWP Order.1 On April 25, 

2024, Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of a CCR to determine if HSP 

is the successor-in-interest to Hyundai 

Steel in the above-referenced Orders.2

Scope of the Orders 

The merchandise covered by these 

orders is CWP, OCTG, WLP, and LDWP 

from Korea. For a complete description 

of the scope of each of these orders, see 

the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.3

Legal Framework 

In determining whether one company 

is the successor-in-interest to another 

company as part of an AD proceeding, 

Commerce examines several factors 

including, but not limited to: (1) 

management and ownership; (2) 

production facilities; (3) supplier 

relationships; and (4) customer base.4

Although no single factor, or 

combination of factors, will necessarily 

provide a dispositive indication of 

successorship, generally, Commerce 

will consider one company to be the 

successor-in-interest to another 

company if its operations are not 

materially dissimilar to those of the 

other company.5 Thus, if the totality of 

the evidence demonstrates that, with 

respect to the production and sale of the 

subject merchandise, the new company 

operates as the same business entity as 

the prior company, Commerce will find 

the new company to be the successorin-interest to the prior company and 

assign the new company the cash 

deposit rate of its predecessor.6

Preliminary Results of the CCR 

In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216, 

we preliminarily determine that HSP is 

the successor-in-interest to Hyundai 

Steel with respect to the subject 

merchandise and the Orders because 

record evidence, as submitted by HSP, 

indicates that HSP operates as 

essentially the same business entity as 

Hyundai Steel. HSP’s management and 

ownership, production facilities, 

supplier relationships, and customer 

base are the same, or substantially the 

same, as those of Hyundai Steel. Based 

on the foregoing, which is explained in 

greater detail in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum, we 

preliminarily determine that HSP is the 

successor-in-interest to Hyundai Steel 

and, as such, that HSP is entitled to 

Hyundai Steel’s AD cash deposit rates 

with respect to entries of subject 

merchandise. 

For a complete discussion of the 

information that HSP provided, and the 

complete successor-in-interest analysis, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. A list of topics discussed 

in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1