alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2182

MARYANN LAREMONT-LOPEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTHEASTERN TIDEWATER OPPORTUNITY PROJECT, Defendant - Appellee, SUANNE LEIGH HARDEE; THOMAS F. HENNESSY, Movants.

No. 98-2217

MARYANN LAREMONT-LOPEZ, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SOUTHEASTERN TIDEWATER OPPORTUNITY PROJECT, Defendant - Appellant, SUANNE LEIGH HARDEE; THOMAS F. HENNESSY, Movants.2Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-96-1202-2) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 3, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maryann Laremont-Lopez, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Gorry, III, John Hume Taylor, Jr., TAYLOR & WALKER, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked “filed” on July 7, 1998, the court’s docket discloses that it was entered on the docket sheet on July 8, 1998. We accept that date as the effective date of the district court’s decision pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 3 PER CURIAM: Maryann Laremont-Lopez appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for rehearing or modification of decision. Cross-Appellant Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project appeals a portion of the same district court order denying the award of attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Laremont-Lopez v. Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project , No. CA-96-1202-2 (E.D. Va. July 8, 1998). * We deny Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project’s motion to dismiss the appeal in 98-2182. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0323.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:26PM -----

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/08/2010 10:02AM 

cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry 

Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: revised RICE preamble/reg 

Cortney, 

Attached is the current revision of the RICE preamble and reg. Note we're still fine-tuning 

the oil analysis program provisions. I've also attached a redline/strikeout copy that shows 

the changes since the previous version that you received. 

(See attached file: OMB Draft RICE NESHAP FRM Preamble and Reg Text 2-7-10.doc) (See 

attached file: OMB Draft RICE NESHAP FRM Preamble and Reg Text 2-7-10 redline.doc) 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0323.txt2/19/2010 12:50:38 PM
#### Richard Roe, casual ejector, and Robert B. Green, tenant in possession, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*John Doe, *ex dem.*Henry Stringfellow *et al.,*defendants in error.

1. Where an instrument is produced, signed by the plaintiff in error, stating that the case was carried to this Court without authority from him, and consenting to its dismissal, his counsel will not be permitted *487to proceed with said litigation for the recovery of their fees, except upon showing that the case had been settled by the defendants in error with notice of the contract under which they were to be compensated. (BJ

2. Knowledge that the movants were of counsel, and that their client was insolvent, is not such notice. (R.)

Fees. Settlement. Notice. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court. July Term, 1873.

When the above'stated case was called, counsel for defendants in error produced a written statement from the plaintiff in error to the effect that said cause was carried to this Court without his consent, and authorizing its dismissal. Counsel for the plaintiff in error objected to the dismissal, upon the ground that they had the right to proceed with the litigation for the recovery of their fees, as the defendants had settled the case with notice that they were of counsel, and that their client was insolvent,.

The Court held that the notice of the contract for fees was not sufficient to bind the defendants.

The case was dismissed.

Russell & Raiford *;*W. A. Farley, for plaintiff in error.

John Peabody *;*D. H. Burts, for defendants.
#### Paul Leader v. Scott M. Ladd, Judge.

VIOLATION OF LIQUOR SELLING INJUNCTION: FACTS HELD SUFFICIENT TO WARRANT PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT.

Friday, May 11, 1894.

This is a proceeding in *certiorari*to review the action of the district court of Woodbury county in adjudging plaintiff guilty of contempt.

*—Affirmed.*

*Argo, McDuffie Argo*for plaintiff.

*Garter Sr Drown*for defendant.

*770GIVEN, J.

At the August term, 1890, of the dis.triet court for Wood-bury county, a decree was duly entered, enjoining the plaintiff from selling, or keeping for sale intoxicating liquors, contrary to law, within the fourth judicial district of Iowa. Upon complaint duly made that plaintiff had violated said injunction, he was cited to appear, and show cause why he should not he punished for contempt. On the hearing, plaintiff was adjudged guilty, and judgment entered against him as authorized in such cases. The sole ground upon which said proceeding is questioned is that there was not sufficient evidence showing a violation of the injunction. The abstract of the evidence, as printed, might sustain this claim; but, as it comes to us, we see no room to doubt the plaintiff’s guilt. The abstract has been corrected by certain interlineations in writing, and, as corrected, shows guilt, beyond any question. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 535 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 535

To amend section 49106(c)(6) of title 49, United States Code, to remove 
                    a limitation on certain funding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 1999

 Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Robb) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 49106(c)(6) of title 49, United States Code, to remove 
                    a limitation on certain funding.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Metropolitan Washington Airports 
Authority Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF LIMITATION.

    Section 49106(c)(6) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (C); and
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C).
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-4390

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JERRY W. HARRISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-98-212)

Submitted: January 18, 2000 Decided: February 4, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hunt L. Charach, Federal Public Defender, George H. Lancaster, Jr.,

First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, John C.

Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Wayne Harrison pled guilty to a nine-count indictment

charging him with multiple violations of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1)

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). At sentencing, Harrison objected to the

pre-sentence report’s recommendation of a two-level enhancement

pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines § 2D1.1 for possession of a firearm. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1 (1998). The

objection was overruled, and Harrison was sentenced to thirty

months’ imprisonment. Harrison appeals his sentence. We affirm.

With regard to drug offenses, the Guidelines provide for a

two-level increase in offense level if a dangerous weapon (including a firearm) was possessed. See USSG § 2D1.1(b)(1). “The

adjustment should be applied if the weapon was present, unless it

is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense.” USSG § 2D1.1, comment. (n.3). We have reviewed the record

and find that the district court did not clearly err in assessing

the enhancement. See United States v. Harris, 128 F.3d 850, 852

(4th Cir. 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 -73

39 40 41 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/12 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 12 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 574 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 574

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections to a map 
           relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO MAP.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall make such corrections 
to the map described in subsection (b) as are necessary to move on that 
map the boundary of the otherwise protected area (as defined in section 
12 of the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3503 note; 
Public Law 101-591)) to the Cape Henlopen State Park boundary to the 
extent necessary--
            (1) to exclude from the otherwise protected area the 
        adjacent property leased, as of the date of enactment of this 
        Act, by the Barcroft Company and Cape Shores Associates (which 
        are privately held corporations under the law of the State of 
        Delaware); and
            (2) to include in the otherwise protected area the 
        northwestern corner of Cape Henlopen State Park seaward of the 
        Lewes and Rehoboth Canal.
    (b) Map Described.--The map described in this subsection is the map 
that is included in a set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'', dated October 24, 1990, as revised October 15, 1992, and that 
relates to the unit of the Coastal Barrier Resources System entitled 
``Cape Henlopen Unit DE-03P''.

            Passed the Senate April 22, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 574

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections to a map 
           relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         500,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,953,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,172,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 13,188,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,979,000
<PP&E>                                       4,391,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,324,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,775,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,415,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,141,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,775,000
<SALES>                                      9,627,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,627,000
<CGS>                                        5,529,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,348,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                617,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   592,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 408

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a former Bureau of Land

Management administrative site to the City of Carson City, Nevada,

for use as a senior center.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. BRYAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a former

Bureau of Land Management administrative site to the

City of Carson City, Nevada, for use as a senior center.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN BUREAU OF LAND

4 MANAGEMENT LANDS IN CARSON CITY, NE5 VADA.

6 (a) CONVEYANCE.—Not later than 120 days after the

7 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Inte8 rior, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land

9 Management, shall convey to the City of Carson City, Ne-
2

•S 408 IS

1 vada, without consideration, all right, title, and interest

2 of the United States in the property described as Govern3 ment lot 1 in sec. 8, T. 15 N., R. 20 E., Mount Diablo

4 Meridian, as shown on the Bureau of Land Management

5 official plat approved October 28, 1996, containing 4.48

6 acres, more or less, and assorted uninhabitable buildings

7 and improvements.

8 (b) USE.—The conveyance of the property under sub9 section (a) shall be subject to reversion to the United

10 States if the property is used for a purpose other than

11 the purpose of a senior assisted living center or a related

12 public purpose.

Æ
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      Year Ended
                                                                                     December 31,
                                                                              --------------------------
                                                                                1998              1997
                                                                              --------          --------
                                                                                 (Dollars in Thousands)
             <S>                                                               <C>               <C>    
             Basic:

             Average shares outstanding                                        502,369           393,900

             Net income                                                        533,390           166,285

             Per share amount                                                     1.06              0.42


             Diluted:

             Average shares outstanding                                        502,369           393,900

             Net effect of dilutive stock options
                                                                                 9,031             2,831
                                                                              --------          --------

             Diluted shares                                                    511,400           396,731

             Net income                                                        533,390           166,285

             Per share amount
                                                                                  1.04              0.42
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkona,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB  for the  quarterly  period  ended  December  31,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
Russo,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


February 18, 2003                   /s/ Stephen Russo
                                     --------------------------
                                        Stephen Russo
                                        Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5408]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement

Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sales

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, 
Interior.

ACTION: List of Restricted Joint Bidders; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and 
Enforcement published a notice in the Federal Register on February 9, 
2011, entitled: ``List of Restricted Joint Bidders'' that contained an 
error. We are correcting the name of an oil company listed under Group 
VIII in that notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel T. Cable, 703-787-1322.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 9, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-2791, 
on page 7230, in the first column, correct the third line in the Group 
VIII section to read:

Statoil USA E&P Inc.

    Dated: March 3, 2011.
Robert P. LaBelle,
Associate Director for Offshore Energy and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-5408 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
# United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-20266

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus
Pedro Mondragon-Gonzalez,

Defendant—Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14-CR-581-1

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Mondragon-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mondragon-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 9, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-20266 Document: 00515932653 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2021No. 20-20266

2 of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 20-20266 Document: 00515932653 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2021