alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000925780
<NAME> IBS FINANCIAL CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,841
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         330,556
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           174,760
<LOANS>                                        199,714
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 740,027
<DEPOSITS>                                     570,744
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,494
<LONG-TERM>                                     36,732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 740,027
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,478
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               18,418
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,896
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,414
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,515
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,381
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       20
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,459
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,912
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,912
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.13
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,104
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,024
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,044
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,044
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Research  Center  J  lich                                   /logo/
-------------------------


Forschungszentrum  J  lich  GmbH  -  PTJ  -  D-52425  J  lich
Delivery  Address:  Leo-Brandt-Strasse  -  D-52428  J  lich

SanguiBioTech  AG
Represented  by  the  Management
Mr.  Prof.  Dr.  Dr.  Wolfgang  Barnikol
Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse  44

58455  Witten  an  der  Ruhr
            J  lich,  March  16,  2001


N  O  T  I  C  E  O  F  C  H  A  N  G  E
----------------------------------------
                                (Project Support)


Re.:      Grants  of  the  Federal  Land  of  North-Rhine-Westphalia
          here:     Technology  Programme  Economy  (TPW)

          Project  No./FKZ:     001-9804-0V04
          PTJ  Ref.  No.:          9804V04

          Project:     DEVELOPMENT  OF A METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ARTIFICIAL
OXYGEN  CARRIERS  ON THE BASIS OF HYPERPOLYMERIC HAEMO-GLOBINS AS BLOOD ADDITIVE
AND  SO-CALLED  BLOOD  SUBSTITUTE

Reference:   Our  Appropriation  Notice  of  November  30,  1998
             Our Notices of Change of Sep. 03, 1999; Jan. 26, 2000; November 16,
             2000
             Your  Payment  Request  of  June  30,  2000
             Your  application  of  February  23,  2001

Appendix:     "Determination  of  the  Need  for  Subsidy"  (as  revised)
              "Project  Monitoring"

Dear  Professor  Barnikol,

Changing  our  above-mentioned  notice,  the funds now will be made available as
follows:

     in  the  business  year  of  1998          DM      589,063.00
     in  the  business  year  of  1999          DM      844,000.00
     in  the  business  year  of  2000          DM       78,800.00
     in  the  business  year  of  2001          DM    2,062,712.00
     in  the  business  year  of  2002          DM            0.00
                                                ------------------
     Total  grants                              DM    3,574,575.00
                                                ==================

At  the same time, we extend the appropriation period beyond MARCH 31, 2001 TILL
JUNE  30,  2002.

The  respective  provision of funds for the year of 2002 will be made at a later
date.

Contrary  to  No.  6 BNBest-P, the Case Report/Proof of Partial Utilization (see
appendix  "Project  Monitoring")  for the year of 2002 is to be submitted to the
Project  Agency  J  lich  (PTJ)  by  December  31,  2002  at  the  latest.

The  appendices "Determination of the Need for Subsidy" and "Project Monitoring"
apply  in  their  amended  version  enclosed  with  this  notice.

As  for  the  rest,  our  above-mentioned  notice  is  applicable.
With  kind  regards

Research  Center  J  lich  GmbH

p.p.               p.p.
/signature/          /signature/
Dr.  H.  Paetsch     S.  Voigt
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JS/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P HI NE AS C AR L E T T A B OL DE N, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y S H E R IF F ; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 55808 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 6 -cv -0 7 7 2 9 -A G -A JW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A ndr e w J . G ui l f

or d, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P hi ne a s C a r l e tt aB ol de n appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt di sm i ss i ng her 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on un der F eder al R ul e of C i vi l P roce du re 

# FI LED JAN 22 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ S/ Res ea r ch 08- 55808 2 3 7 ( b ) f o rf a ilu r e to c o m p lyw ith ad is c o v e ryo r d e rc o m p e llin g h e rd e p o s itio n . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w f o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , M a lo n e v. U

. S. P o sta l

Serv . , 8 3 3 F. 2 d1 2 8 , 1 3 0 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 8 7 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on by di sm i ss i ng the ac t i on af t er f i ndi ng tha tB ol de n w i l l f ul l yf a i l e d t o appe a ra the rde pos i t i on de s pi t e be i ng o r d e r e dto d o s o a n dw a rn e dth a t n o n c o m p lia n c e c o u ldr e s u lt in d is m is s a l. See H yde & D rath v. B aker , 2 4 F .3 d1 1 6 2 , 1 1 6 6 - 6 7 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 4 ) ( s e ttin g f o rth f a c to r s th a t ad is tr ic t c o u rt m u s t c o n s id e rb e f o r e d is m is s in g a n a c tio n f o rf a ilu r e to c om pl yw i th adi s c ove ryor de r , a nd e xpl a i ni ng tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtha s w i de di sc re t i on i n d et erm i ni ng the l ocat i on of depo si t i on s) . B ol de n’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons a r e una va i l i ng. AF F I RME D.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cintech Solutions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Diane M. Kamionka, Chief Executive Officer, and Dino Lucarelli, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



CINTECH SOLUTIONS, INC.


By:  /s/ Diane M. Kamionka                               Date: February 14, 2003
       ---------------------------------
      Diane M. Kamionka
      President and Chief Executive Officer


By:  /s/ Dino Lucarelli                                  Date: February 14, 2003
       ----------------------------------
      Dino Lucarelli
      Chief Financial Officer


                                       22
<TABLE>

                                                                                          Exhibit 11  




                               Movie Gallery, Inc.

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

<CAPTION>
                                            Thirteen weeks ended          Thirty-nine weeks ended
                                         October 5     September 29      October 5     September 29                
                                            1997           1996            1997            1996
                                       ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

<S>                                    <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Net loss                               $ (1,669,000)   $ (4,237,000)   $   (876,000)   $ (2,214,000)
                                       ============    ============    ============    ============

Shares:
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding                           13,418,885      13,422,534      13,419,939      13,180,362
Net effect of dilutive stock options           --              --              --           169,762
                                       ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
Weighted average common and common
   equivalent shares outstanding         13,418,885      13,422,534      13,419,939      13,350,124
                                       ============    ============    ============    ============
Net loss per common and
   common equivalent share             $       (.12)   $       (.32)   $       (.07)   $       (.17)
                                       ============    ============    ============    ============

</TABLE>
<pre>

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that:

(i) the Annual Report  on Form 10-KSB/A of  the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2006 , as amended, (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a)  or Section 15(d),  as applicable, of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                      /s/   Inti Shaikh
                      ---------------------------
                      Inti Shaikh
                      CEO
                     (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  January 25, 2008



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley
Act of 2002 the undersigned officer of Vote Power Corp. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that:

(i) the Annual Report  on Form 10-KSB/A of  the Company for the  year
ended December 31, 2006, as amended,  (the Report) fully complies with  the
requirements of Section 13(a)  or Section 15(d),  as applicable, of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

                        VOTE POWER CORPORATION
                        /S/ Inti Shaikh
                        ----------------------------
                        Inti Shaikh
                        Secretary/Treasurer
                        (Principal Financial Officer)


Dated:  January 25, 2008
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Michael E. Kalogris, President and Chief Executive Officer of SunCom Wireless, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC ReleaseNo. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

 

(c) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and****

 

(d) disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and****

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 31, 2005
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Goran Capital, Inc. -
Consolidated                                                                                          Exhibit 11
Analysis of Earnings Per Share
US GAAP - Treasury Method

                                                                  Nine Months                           Nine Months
                                                                     Ended                                 Ended
See Note (1) below                                               September 30,                         September 30,
                                                                     2000                                  1999

<S>                                                                <C>                <C>                <C>
Average Price (US $)                                                  N/A                (A)                N/A

Proceeds from Exercise of Warrants and Options (US $)                 Nil                (B)                Nil

Shares Repurchased - Treasury Method                                  Nil             (B) / (A)             Nil

Shares Outstanding - Weighted Average                              5,837,509                             5,876,398

Add:  Options and Warrants Outstanding (1)                            Nil                                   Nil

Less:  Treasury Method - Shares Repurchased                           Nil                                   Nil

Shares Outstanding for US GAAP Purposes                            5,837,509            (C )             5,876,398

Net Earnings in Accordance with US GAAP                          $(34,649,000)           (D)           $(19,623,000)

Earnings (loss) Per Share - US GAAP - Basic                         $(5.94)                               $(3.34)

Earnings (loss) Per Share - US GAAP - Fully Diluted                 $(5.94)          (D) / (C )           $(3.34)

Note 1: There were no options  with a dilutive  effect for the nine months ended
September 30, 2000 or 1999.
</TABLE>
#### T. C. OAKLEY v. C. M. VAN NOPPEN.

*Homestead.*

Although the real property of a judgment debtor is incapable of division, and although it would he more advantageous to creditors to have it sold, the Court has no power to order a sale of the land, and a payment to the debtor of one thousand dollars in money in *lieu*of his homestead.

*(Campbell*v. *White,*95 N. C., 491; cited and approved).

ExcbptioNS to the report of assessors appointed to allot the homestead, heard before *Connor, Judge,*at Fall Term, 1886, of Durham Superior Court.

On execution issued upon a judgment recovered by the plaintiff, the sheriff caused the homestead exemption of the defendant to be valued and laid off to him as prescribed by law, and return thereof made to the clerk of the Superior Court with said execution. The plaintiff filed several objections to the report of the appraisers of their action in the premises, among which is the following, numbered 4 in the series: “ That the value of said house and lot, (from which the homestead was set apart,) undivided, is $2,500, the value of the house alone being $1,500; that the house and lot, (as plaintiff believes,) if sold together, will bring such sum as is amply sufficient to pay off the judgment of the plaintiff and pay the defendant the sum of $1,000, with which he can purchase such a homestead as the law allows; yet the excess, for the reasons set forth, would not bring at public sale more than $600, to the great loss of the plaintiff; that the plaintiff believes the homestead allotted to the defendant as aforesaid, exceeds in value the homestead allowed by the law of this State.”

An issue was accordingly submitted to the jury, who find the land, so set apart as exempt, is worth $1,500.

*248Thereupon, judgment was entered directing a sale of the entire lot, and the payment of the proceeds of sale into the clerk’s office, whereof $1,000 should be retained, subject to the further order of the Court, and the residue to be applied to the plaintiff’s judgment. Prom this judgment the defendant appeals.

*Mr. John Manning,*for the plaintiff.

No counsel for the defendant.

Smith, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). There is error in directing a sale. There should have been a re-allotment within the constitutional limits, which are overrun in the first valuation. The present case, with perhaps less reason in' support of the order, is governed by the recent case of *Campbell*v. *White,*95 N. C., 491, of which the Judge must not have known when the decree was made, and adhering to the ruling in that case, we do not propose to review it.

The judgment below must be reversed, that further proceedings be had according to law.

Error. Reversed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 31, 2024.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

      ( print page 85574)    
Dated: October 24, 2024.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-25077 Filed 10-24-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P