alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual
report of Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31,
2002.





                        /s/ James DiLorenzo
                        --------------------------------------------------------
                      Name: James DiLorenzo
                     Title: Executive Vice President
                            (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



Date: June 24, 2003
From: vaughn

To: Finamore, Robert (OST)

Subject: Re: Norwegian"s DOT application

Date: Friday, January 24, 2014 8:47:45 AM

Thanks for the feedback Bob.

FYI, there is a concern that the DOT will not act in the best interest of the traveling

public.

Best,

Vaughn

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:37 AM, <Robert.Finamore@dot.gov> wrote:

Dear Mr. Cordle,

Because a number of interested parties have filed responsive pleadings to NAI’s

application and this matter is currently pending before the Department, I cannot

comment on the merits of NAI’s request or otherwise engage in any substantive

discussion on the matter. As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy of your

e-mail and my response in Docket DOT-OST-2013-0204, as a contact outside the

record of this case. You may track the progress of this case and view the publicly

available documents filed in the docket by accessing the Federal Docket

Management System (FDMS) at www.regulations.gov and searching for Docket

DOT-OST-2013-0204. 

Regards,

Bob Finamore

From: vaughn [mailto:vaughn@ionospherecapital.com] 

Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 1:59 PM

To: Vaughn Cordle, CFA

Subject: Norwegian's DOT application

Hi,

We have been working for the last several weeks with a couple of analysts in

Europe on Norwegian's business model and financial outlook. The purpose of the
work is to value the airline and write an investment opinion for several institutional

investors. 

I've also examined the contractor that will hire and manage pilots for the new

B787 base and estimated the labor and unit cost savings [with key European and

U.S. Airlines] over a three year time horizon.

The business model is unique and the introduction of low-cost, low-fare flights

between Europe and the U.S. will no doubt come at the expense of higher cost US

and European airlines.

Any thoughts about whether or not the application with the DOT will be accepted?

Any feedback will be kept confidential and I'll share some of the work we produce

if you are interested.

Thanks,

Vaughn

--

Vaughn Cordle, CFA

IONOSPHERE Capital LLC

Washington, DC

703 830-1701 (office)

703 946-5474 (mobile)

vaughn@ionospherecapital.com

'Proprietary Information-Draft'

The information contained in this document/email is privileged and confidential, and is intended only

for the use of the individual named or others who have been specifically authorized to receive such

from Ionosphere Capital, LLC. If the recipient is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified

that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited.
-- 

Vaughn Cordle, CFA

IONOSPHERE Capital LLC

Washington, DC

703 830-1701 (office)

703 946-5474 (mobile)

vaughn@ionospherecapital.com

'Proprietary Information-Draft'

The information contained in this document/email is privileged and confidential, and is intended only for

the use of the individual named or others who have been specifically authorized to receive such from

Ionosphere Capital, LLC. If the recipient is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any

dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                               October 16, 2001

HomeSeekers.com, Incorporated
6490 S. McCarran Blvd., Suite D-28
Reno, Nevada 89508
Attn: Board of Directors


Gentlemen:

        For personal reasons I hereby tender my resignation as Chairman of the
Board of Directors and as a director of HomeSeekers.com, Incorporated effective
October 17, 2001.

                                        Sincerely,


                                        /S/ JOSEPH HARKER

                                        Joseph Harker


15800 Dooley Road, Suite 170
Addison, Texas 75001
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.7A

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$300,000.00                                                     December 1, 1999



         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby promises to pay to Verilink
Corporation ("Verilink") at Huntsville, Alabama, the principal amount of Three
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00). All principal due under this Note shall
be paid on the earlier of (i) termination of the undersigned's employment with
Verilink for any reason provided, however, that for purposes of this paragraph
(i), the principal balance of this Note will be reduced by 50% for each full
year that the undersigned remains employed by Verilink; or (ii) within one (1)
year after the value of the undersigned's exercisable Verilink stock options
exceed $2,000,000 (fair market value of stock subject to exercisable options
less total exercise price of such options). Interest shall be forgiven.

         This Note may be prepaid at any time, in whole or in part, without
premium or penalty.

         If action should be instituted on this Note, the undersigned agrees to
pay the holder, in addition to such amounts owed pursuant to this Note, all
costs of collection, including a reasonable sum of attorney's fees.

         This Promissory Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Alabama.



                                                 /s/ Michael L. Reiff
                                             ------------------------------
                                                   Michael L. Reiff
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 428

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to ensure that producers

of all classes of soft white wheat (including club wheat) are permitted

to repay marketing assistance loans, or receive loan deficiency payments,

for the wheat at the same rate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1999

Mr. GORTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to ensure

that producers of all classes of soft white wheat (including club wheat) are permitted to repay marketing assistance loans, or receive loan deficiency payments, for the

wheat at the same rate.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 428 IS

1 SECTION 1. REPAYMENT RATE FOR MARKETING ASSIST2 ANCE LOANS FOR WHEAT; LOAN PAYMENT

3 RATE FOR LOAN DEFICIENCY PAYMENTS FOR

4 WHEAT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 134(a)(2) of the Agricul6 tural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7234(a)(2)) is

7 amended—

8 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at

9 the end;

10 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period

11 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

12 (3) by adding at the end the following:

13 ‘‘(E) in the case of soft white wheat, be

14 uniform for all classes of the wheat, including

15 club wheat.’’.

16 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub17 section (a) shall apply beginning with the 1997 crop of

18 wheat.

Æ
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAL SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71059

Agency No. A078-645-568

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. 

Pal Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

MAR 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71059

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings. Afriyie v. Holder, 613 F.3d 924, 931 (9th Cir. 2010). 

We grant the petition for review and we remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s relocation finding

because it is unclear if the agency placed the burden on the government to show

relocation was reasonable, see id. at 935, and because the agency failed to analyze

whether the proposed relocation within India was reasonable as guided by the

considerations listed in 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.13(b)(3) and 1208.16(b)(3), see id. at

936-37 (9th Cir. 2010) (remanding because “[t]he BIA failed to discuss the

reasonableness factors set forth in [the regulations] or discuss how the government

met its burden of showing that relocation was reasonable”). Accordingly, we

remand Singh’s asylum and withholding of removal claims, for further proceedings

consistent with this disposition. 

With respect to Singh’s CAT claim, the IJ denied it on the basis of his

adverse credibility determination. The BIA, without any analysis, agreed with the

IJ. Given that the BIA otherwise chose to not review the IJ’s adverse credibility

determination, it is not clear whether the BIA denied Singh’s CAT claim on the 
3 08-71059

merits or on credibility grounds. Accordingly, we also grant Singh’s petition for

review with respect to his CAT claim. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
#### SAMUEL CALVERT *v.*HENRY WILLIAMS, Jr.

A note in renewal oí a former note of the maker *for money won ai cards,*given to one who is endorsee of such former note for value and without notice, is not affected by *the gaming*consideration.

*(Paimer*v. *Giles,*5 Jon. Eq. 75, cited and approved.)

. Case-agreed, decided by *Watts, J.,*at Fall Terra 1869 of Warren Court.

Tbe claim of tbe plaintiff was founded upon a note given to him by tbe defendant, partly in satisfaction of another note, and partly for board. The former note had been made by the defendant to one Christmas, for money won at cards; and it had been endorsed to the plaintiff by Christmas, for value, and without notice of its consideration; and at the time the new note was given, he had no such notice.

His Honor, thinking the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, gave judgment for the defendant; and the plaintiff appealed.

*Rogers &*Batchelor, for the appellant.

The *gaming*consideration does not infect the present note: *Gray*v. *McLean,*1 Dev. 46, *Greenlcmd*v. *Dyer,*17 E. O. L. 315, *Cutlibert*v. *Holy*8 Term Eeps. 390, *Turner*v. *Eulme,*4Esp. 11, *Boultong. Coglen, cited, Hay*v. *Ayling*71E. 0.L.430.

They also cited *Hawker*v. *Hallowell,*39 Eng. L. & E. 70, *Eckva/rds*v. *Dick*6 E. C. L. 405, and 6 Alabama, 144..

*Bragg, contra ;*

cited *Turner*v. *Peacock*2 Dev. 303, 1 Sel. L. Cas. 169, and *Warden*v. *Plummer,*4 Jon. 424.

Pearson, 0. J.

A note to secure the payment of money won at cards, is void by statute. Although the note be passed by endorsement, for valuable consideration, and without notice to the endorsee, it is void in his hands. So, i the maker executes a second note to the *original payee,*either in renewal of the first note simply, or including another debt, the second note is void; for it is to secure the paymen *169of money won at cards, and the taint in the part of the consideration vitiates the whole — “a rotten *egg:" Palmer*v. *Giles,*5 Jon. Eq. 75.

In our case the maker executed the second note *to Calvert,.*who was the endorsee for valuable consideration, and without notice. This second note was given to secure the price paid by Calvert for the first note, and not to secure the payment of the money which Christmas had won : for the purpose of making it must be referred to the proximate, and not the remote cause. The consideraation, therefore, is not tainted by the illegality which vitiated the first note. His Honor erred in failing to .note the distinction.

*Cuthbert*v. *Hayly*8 Term 390, cited by Mr. Batchelor, establishes this distinction. The more recent case *Hay*v. *Ayling,*71 E. C. L. 423, treats the point as settled, and is put on the ground that the endorsee had notice, and that the second note was a mere device or contrivance to cover-over the taint in the first note.

There is error. Judgment reversed, and Judgment for the-plaintiff on the case agreed.

Pee Oueiam. Judgment reversed, &c.
Bryan W. Shaw, Ph.D., P.E., Chairman 

Toby Baker, Commissioner 

Zak Covar, Commissioner 

Richard A. Hyde, P.E., Executive Director 

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

Protecting Texas by Reducing and Preventing Pollution 

January 6, 2015 

Mr. Ron Curry 

Regional Administrator, Region 6 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

Re: 	 Proposed Listing of the Main Street Ground Water Plume Site to the Federal National 

Priorities List 

Dear Mr. Curry: 

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) supports U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency's (EPA) decision that the Main Street Ground Water Plume Site be 

considered as a candidate site for the federal National Priorities List (NPL) for cleanup. 

The TCEQ believes that this site is eligible for the proposed NPL listing based on evaluations of 

the site under the federal Hazard Ranking System. 

Sinccrcl), 

Richard A. Hyde, P.E. 

Executive Director 

cc: 	 The Honorable Rick Perry, Governor of Texas 

Mr. Carl Edlund, Superfund Division Director, EPA 

Ms. Pam Phillips, Superfund Deputy Director, EPA 

Mr. Chris Villareal, Chief Risk and Site Assessment, EPA 

Ms. Brenda Nixon Cook, Region 6, NPL Coordinator, EPA 

Mr. Brent Wade, Deputy Director, Office of Waste, TCEQ 

Ms. Beth Seaton, Director, Remediation Division, TCEQ 

P.O. Box 13087 • Austin, Texas 78711-3087 • 512-239-1000 • tceq.texas.gov 

How is our customer service? tceq.texas.gov/customersurvey
EXIBIT
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sector 10, Inc.; on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Laurence A. Madison, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.






By:  /s/ Laurence A.
Madison




Name:
Laurence A. Madison


Chief
Financial Officer




February
22, 2010







39
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         666,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    142,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               816,160
<PP&E>                                         134,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 959,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,667
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         90
<COMMON>                                         3,697
<OTHER-SE>                                     844,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   959,355
<SALES>                                          7,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,008
<CGS>                                            3,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,013,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (990,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (990,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (990,169)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual
report of Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. & Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31,
2003.





/s/ Cedric Kushner
------------------
Name: Cedric Kushner
Title: Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



Date: June 23, 2004
#### Schultz, Respondent, vs. Schultz and another, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Chester D. Richardson*of Kenosha.

For the respondent: *Vaudreuil & Vaudreuil*of Kenosha.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF: M.C., A MINOR, M.C., Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 67700 

# FILED
JAN 1 42016

LI .EMAN
BY E COU '11

.7 r no+ ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is an appeal from an order certifying a child for criminal proceedings as an adult. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; William 0. Voy, Judge.

M.C. contends that the juvenile court abused its discretion in certifying her because it concluded that the nature and seriousness of the charged offenses alone warranted certification without considering her individual characteristics and experiences. She argues that the juvenile court must take into account a juvenile's individual characteristics and experiences when analyzing the nature and seriousness of charged offenses and cites to numerous United States Supreme Court cases to support her argument.

We conclude that the juvenile court properly considered the nature and seriousness of the charged offenses. The cases cited by M.C. do not address certification proceedings but primarily focus on considerations when a juvenile is already in the adult criminal system. There currently is no requirement that a juvenile's individual characteristics and experiences be taken into account when considering the nature and seriousness of the crime. See In the Matter of Seven Minors, 99 Nev. 427, 664 P.2d 947 (1983), disapproved of on other grounds by Matter of William

(th 194M cePickering

Sailta S., 122 Nev. 432, 132 P.3d 1015 (2006). But even if there were such a requirement, it appears that the juvenile court took M.C.'s individual characteristics and experiences into account. While the juvenile court made a finding that the nature of the offenses in this matter was so heinous and egregious to warrant certification alone, it noted M.C.'s lack of previously admitted and adjudicated offenses, her age, and her life story, which was extensively put on the record during briefing and oral argument of the matter. In its order granting certification, the juvenile court concluded that M.C.'s "subjective factors do not outweigh the nature and seriousness of the offenses." See id at 435, 664 P.2d at 952-53. Therefore, it appears that the juvenile court did consider M.C.'s individual characteristics and experiences and determined that certification was warranted. Accordingly, we conclude the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion, see In the Matter of Eric A.L., 123 Nev. 26, 33, 153 P.3d 32, 36 (2007), and we

ORDER the judgment of the juvenile court AFFIRMED.

Hardesty 

# P

ide&t.tuf_, J.

cc: Hon. William 0. Voy, District Judge, Family Court Division Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ero 2

c5c

. ? •
Exhibit 32.1:

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. Zugibe, as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|/s/ Kevin J. Zugibe        
|---------------------------
|Kevin J. Zugibe            
|Chief Executive Officer and
|Chairman of the Board      
|                           
|November 1, 2006