alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ryan Letzeiser

Creisoft, inc.

809 W. Hill Street Suite D

Charlotte, NC 28208

Specific Sections in which Creisoft, inc. is seeking an exemption: IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION 

FOR EXEMPTION OF: Creisoft, inc. FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE 

REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) 

& (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING 

COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 3 + DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT 

SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT 

OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95) 

Extent of relief and our reason for seeking relief: In order to use our Unmanned Aircraft Systems for 

commercial use. We are seeking this exemption in order to legally conduct business and comply with all 

Federal regulations and standards put forth by the FAA while operating our Unmanned Aircraft Systems. 

How our request would benefit the public as a whole: Granting the petition for Creisoft, Inc. would allow 

for us to be able to efficiently, legally, economically, and safely perform aerial video, photography, and 

remote sensing for the purpose of land surveillance, land surveying, real estate, commercial inspections, 

insurance inspection and commercial maintenance over certain areas of these United States. 

Using Unmanned Aircraft Systems such as drone technology would greatly reduce negative impacts on the 

environment and also provide a safer alternative for businesses to conduct land and real estate inspections

for investment properties mitigating risk. Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or 

how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rule: By adhering to 

guidelines set forth by the FAA I would not be going above the recommended altitude nor flying at night 

therefore avoiding any hazardous accidents such as colliding with a manned aircraft. Having spent 20 hours 

in a manned aircraft as a student pilot, with an effort to complete my private license in the next 6-12 

months, I understand the risk associated with operating an UAS for manned aircraft. We will be giving 

notification to the FAA 72 hours prior to any commercial use. Also we will be regularly test flying and 

doing daily maintenance logs to ensure the UAS are in proper working order for each job or event as to 

prevent damage or bodily harm to the operators or innocent bystanders. 

Summary to publish in the Federal Register stating;

1. SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL 

REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & 

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI FLAMEWHEEL F450 

+ DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA 

MONDERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95) 

2. We are seeking exemption in order to use our UAS for commercial use. Submitted on July 6th 2015 by: 

Ryan Letzeiser

(248)-231-6117

rletzeiser@obiecre.com

Creisoft, inc.

809 W. Hill Street Suite D

Charlotte, NC 28208
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00656

- CR

ERNEST PARR v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No 2 of Denton County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CR

- 2011

- 07658

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 9, 2014
#### Benjamin Lombard, Jr., Appellant, v. Edwin J. Bush *et al.,*Appellees.

Appeal: waiver: acceptance of payment of judgment.

*Appeal from. Union District Court.*— Hon. J. W. Harvey, Judge.

Saturday, January 23, 1892.

Action in equity to recover the amount due on a promissory note, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure its payment. A judgment for the amount due on the note and for the foreclosure of the mortgage was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, but from a portion of the judgment which awarded to the defendant S. E. Rex the possession of the mortgaged premises from the sixth day of August, 1889, and the rents which should accrue after that date, the plaintiff appeals,

*719
      *D. Ettien,*for appellant.

*McDeil # Sullivan,*for appellees S. E. Rex and C. S. Rex.

Robinson, C. J.

The material facts in this case are set out quite fully in the opinion in *Anglo-American Land Mortgage Agency Co. v. Bush, ante,*p. —, and need not he repeated here. The district court in this ease, as in that, found that Mrs. S. E. Rex was entitled to the possession of the mortgaged property from the sixth day of August, 1889, and to the rents which should accrue after that date until such time as her right of redemption should expire, in ease the plaintiff should cause the premises to he sold for the payment of his judgment. It is made to appear that the plaintiff, before taking his appeal in this case, caused an execution to issue on his judgment, hy virtue of which the mortgaged premises were sold for an amount sufficient to satisfy the judgment, and that it was satisfied from the proceeds of the sale. -Under these circumstances the plaintiff had ceased to have any interest in that portion of the judgment of which he complains. His appeal is therefore dismissed.
EXHIBIT 99.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cintech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dino Lucarelli, Acting Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











CINTECH SOLUTIONS, INC.





By:

/s/ Dino Lucarelli

Date: August 4, 2003

Dino Lucarelli

Acting Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141759) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 23 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141759) and Amendment No. 288 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
















Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 22, 2014
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

| 1)     | Resource Bank, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Bankshares Corporation.                               |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                  |
| 2)     | Resource Service Corporation, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Bank.                                  |
|   |                                                                                                                                  | (a) | Financial Planners Mortgage, L.L.P., is a Virginia general partnership registered as a limited liability partnership, in which Resource Service Corporation owns a 49%interest. |
|   |                                                                                                                                  |
| 3)     | Resource Capital Trust I, a Delaware business trust, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resource Bankshares  Corporation.           |
|   |                                                                                                                                  |
| 4)     | CW and Company of Virginia, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resource Bank.                                    |
|   |                                                                                                                                  |
| 5)     | PRC Title LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resource Bank.                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                  |
| 6)     | Resource Capital Trust II, a Delaware business trust, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resource Bankshares Corporation                 |
|   |                                                                                                                                  |
| 7)     | Resource Capital Trust III, a Delaware business trust, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resource Bankshares  Corporation          |
|   |                                                                                                                                  |
| 8)     | Virginia Financial Services, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, in which Resource Bankshares Corporation owns a 49% interest. |
---

**EXHIBIT 12.2**

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Martin Tutschek, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Forum National
  Investments Ltd.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
  untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
  to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
  as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
  that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
  during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
  period covered by this annual report based on such evaluations; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
  by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
  materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting:
  and

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
  based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
  of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
  or operation of internal control of financial reporting which are reasonably
  likely to affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
  report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
  or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
  controls over financial reporting;

|Date: December 22, 2006 | /s/
      *Martin Tutschek*                                
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Martin Tutschek, Chief Financial Officer and
      Director

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-74278, No.333-92324, No. 333-108348, No. 333-112326 and No. 333-122656) and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-108346) of Magma Design Automation, Inc. of our report dated June 14, 2005 relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

June 14, 2005
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 490

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the conducting

of certain games of chance shall not be treated as an unrelated trade

or business.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. GRAMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the conducting of certain games of chance shall

not be treated as an unrelated trade or business.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONDUCT OF CERTAIN GAMES OF CHANCE NOT

4 TREATED AS UNRELATED TRADE OR BUSI5 NESS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 513(f)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain

8 bingo games) is amended by inserting before the period

9 ‘‘or qualified games of chance’’.
2

•S 490 IS

1 (b) QUALIFIED GAMES OF CHANCE.—Subsection (f)

2 of section 513 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re3 lating to unrelated trade or business) is amended by add4 ing at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(3) QUALIFIED GAMES OF CHANCE.—For pur6 poses of paragraph (1), the term ‘qualified game of

7 chance’ means any game of chance (other than

8 bingo) conducted by an organization if—

9 ‘‘(A) such organization is licensed pursu10 ant to State law to conduct such game,

11 ‘‘(B) only organizations which are orga12 nized as nonprofit corporations or are exempt

13 from tax under section 501(a) may be so li14 censed to conduct such game within the State,

15 and

16 ‘‘(C) the conduct of such game does not

17 violate State or local law.’’

18 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The subsection

19 heading of section 513(f) of the Internal Revenue Code

20 of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘BINGO GAMES’’ and in21 serting ‘‘GAMES OF CHANCE’’.

22 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

23 this section shall apply to games conducted after the date

24 of enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.42

                                          June 1, 2001

Mr. Robert A. Eberle
7 Rockrimmon Road
North Hampton, NH 03862

Dear Rob:

   Reference is made to your employment agreement with Bottomline Technologies
(de), Inc. (the "Company") dated as of September 30, 1998 (the "Agreement").

   By delivery and execution of this letter, the Company hereby agrees to
continue the Agreement for an additional 24-month period commencing September
30, 2001 and ending on September 30, 2003, unless sooner terminated in
accordance with the provisions of Section 5 of the Agreement. For all purposes
of the Agreement, such extension shall be deemed a portion of the Employment
Period, as defined in the Agreement.

   In all respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, as so
extended, provided, however, that:

   1.It is agreed and acknowledged that your current titles, for purposes of
     the Agreement, are Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and
     Chief Financial Officer, and that the first sentence of Section 2 of the
     Agreement is hereby amended accordingly.

   2.It is further agreed that your current annual base salary is $220,000, and
     that Section3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended accordingly. Further
     salary, bonus and option adjustments may be made from time to time in
     accordance with the terms of the Agreement as so extended.

   3.It is further agreed that in the event of the termination of your
     employment with the Company other than for "cause", as defined in the
     Agreement, (i) all options held by you shall immediately vest and (ii) you
     shall have a period of two years (or the remainder of the option term if
     less than two years) after the date of termination to exercise all options
     you hold; provided, however, the automatic vesting under this particular
     provision shall not apply to any prior grant of options at a strike price
     less than the closing price of Bottomline's stock on the date hereof,
     unless subsequently provided for at a later date by a vote of the Board or
     the Compensation Committee.

   By execution of this letter, you hereby agree to the foregoing extension of
the Agreement, and reaffirm your obligations under the Agreement.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          Daniel M. McGurl
                                          Chairman of the Board
                                          and Chief Executive Officer

Agreed to and Acknowledged By:

--------------------------------------

Cc: Mr. Joseph Leo Barry
   Mr. James Zilinski
#### Turner-Roe, Respondent, vs. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Hayes & Hayes,*attorneys, and *William A. Hayes*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Arlo McKinnon*and *John W. O'Boyle,*both of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 4.4**     AGREEMENT effective as of the 28th day of December, 2005 among Waste Services,Inc., a Delaware corporation (“WSI”) and Kelso Investment Associates VI, L.P., a Delaware limitedpartnership, and KEP VI, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (collectively, the “KelsoParties”).     WHEREAS, the Kelso Parties are the holders of all of the issued and outstanding shares ofSeries A Preferred Stock of WSI;     AND WHEREAS, WSI has, pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated CreditAgreement dated as of December 28, 2005 (the “Fourth Amendment”), agreed to incur additionalindebtedness in an aggregate principal amount of up to $50 million under the incremental term loanfacility pursuant to Section 10.1(b) of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as ofApril 30, 2004, as amended; and     AND WHEREAS, the Kelso Parties have agreed that the limitations and restrictions of the of theAmended Certificate of Designations of the Series A Preferred Stock of WSI shall be amended asprovided herein.     NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: 1. Amendment to Section 5(c). The number $320 million in theparenthetical in the last sentence of Section 5(c) is hereby amended to read “$320million plus the amount of additional indebtedness incurred under the incremental termloan facility pursuant to the Fourth Amendment”.  2. Amendments to Section 11.    The definition of Amended and Restated Credit Agreement is hereby amended toprovide that the aggregate term and revolving borrowings is $160 million plus theamount of additional indebtedness incurred under the incremental term loan facilitypursuant to the Fourth Amendment.    The definition of Committed Amount is hereby amended by inserting after the number$320 million the following: “plus the amount of additional indebtedness incurredunder the incremental term loan facility pursuant to the Fourth Amendment”.  3. Certificate of Designations For the avoidance of doubt, the partieshereto hereby acknowledge and agree that the amendments to the Certificate ofDesignations contained in this agreement shall be deemed to be amendments to theCertificate of Designations.  4. Full Force and Effect. Except as provided herein, the Certificate ofDesignations shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the provisionsthereof.
 

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed as of the dayand year first above written.      WASTE SERVICES, INC.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-12267-01-R9]


Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Order on Petition for 
Objection to State Operating Permit for Coolidge Generating Station

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an order dated September 11, 2024, granting in part and denying in part 
a petition dated May 13, 2024, from Sierra Club. The Petition requested 
that the EPA object to a Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating permit 
issued by the Pinal County Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD) to the 
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District's 
Coolidge Generating Station (``SRP Coolidge''), an electricity 
generating station located in Coolidge, Arizona.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Valladolid, EPA Region 9, 
(415) 947-4103, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#186e797474797c7774717c367b796c707d6a71767d587d6879367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3c4a5d50505d5853505558125f5d4854594e5552597c594c5d125b534a">[email protected]</span></a>. The final Order and 
Petition are available electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA received a petition from Sierra Club 
dated May 13, 2024, requesting that the EPA object to the issuance of 
operating permit no. V20676.R02, issued by PCAQCD to SRP Coolidge in 
Coolidge, Arizona. On September 11, 2024, the EPA Administrator issued 
an order granting in part and denying in part the petition. The Order 
explains the basis for the EPA's decision.
    Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner 
may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny 
issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later 
than December 30, 2024.

    Dated: October 21, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2024-25153 Filed 10-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>