alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Estate of Von Nobel: Ebenreiter, Claimant, Appellant, vs. Woulf, Administrator, Respondent.

*November 4*

December *2, 1941.*

*234For the appellant there were briefs by *Lehner & Lehner, Adolph P. Lehner,*and *Howard Eslíen,*all of Oconto Falls, and oral argument by *Adolph P. Lehner.*

*Emmet McCarthy*of Marinette, for the respondent.

Fritz, J.

On this appeal the appellant, Ruth Ebenreiter, contends that she has an equitable lien on $747.30 received by Arthur Woulf, as administrator, on the sale of certain items of property purchased by Henry Von Nobel, deceased, under conditional sales contracts made between him and appellant; that this lien stands in place of her security; and that therefore the county court erred in denying her petition to amend the judgment entered November 13, 1940, allowing Jier claim in full as an unsecured claim, by now providing *235that her claim is a preferred claim against money received by the administrator for the property pledged as security.

In the petition filed by appellant on April 30, 1941, upon which she bases her motion for the amendment of the judgment, there is no allegation whatever as to any mistake, fraud, or other circumstance which might be considered to afford an excuse for her delay in seeking relief by the amendment of the judgment. The petition was not filed until thirty-three months after the time for filing claims expired on July 19, 1938, thirty-one months after her claim was proven and allowed, and five months after judgment was entered on all claims allowed. Consequently, when appellant petitioned for additional relief by an amendment of the judgment, all claims against the estate had become barred under sec. 313.08, Stats., for many months, excepting in so far as they had been filed by July 1, 1938, which was the time limited by an order duly entered for that purpose. Under the rule barring claims not filed within the time so limited, claims duly filed within that time cannot be amended after the expiration of such time so as to increase the amount or nature of the relief or materially change the basis therefor. *Estate of White,*223 Wis. 270, 270 N. W. 34; *Estate of Leu,*172 Wis. 530, 179 N. W. 796. Moreover to justify the amendment or setting aside of a judgment or order in probate proceedings there must be a proper showing of some fraud or mistake. *Estate of Penney,*225 Wis. 455, 473, 274 N. W. 247. At all events, as there is no such showing or even any showing of excusable neglect or inadvertence, we cannot conclude that there was any abuse of discretion on the part of the court in denying appellant’s motion to amend the judgment.

*By the Court.-*— Order affirmed.
State of California

HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE

Section 41210

41210. (a)   There is hereby created the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management

District.

(b)   The boundaries of the Mojave Desert district shall include all of the County

of San Bernardino and the County of Riverside that is not included within the

boundaries of the south coast district, and any other area included pursuant to

subdivision (c).

(c)   The Mojave Desert district board may, by resolution, include in the Mojave

Desert district any other area upon receipt of a resolution from the district that currently

includes the area requesting inclusion and specifying the area to be included. All

territory included within the Mojave Desert district shall be contiguous.

(Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 872, Sec. 100. Effective January 1, 1997.)
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K, (the Report), of SunCom Wireless, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, David D. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ David D. ClarkName:

David D. ClarkTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 31, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to SunCom Wireless, Inc. and will be retained by SunCom Wireless, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of SunCom Wireless, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of the annual report on Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2951 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2951

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to 
 investigate opportunities to better manage the water resources in the 
           Salmon Creek watershed of the Upper Columbia River.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SALMON CREEK WATERSHED, WASHINGTON, WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior may conduct a study 
to investigate the opportunities to better manage the water resources 
in the Salmon Creek Watershed, a tributary to the Upper Columbia River 
system, Okanagoan County, Washington, so as to restore and enhance 
fishery resources (especially the endangered Upper Columbia Spring 
Chinook and Steelhead), while maintaining or improving the availability 
of water supplies for irrigation practices vital to the economic well-
being of the county.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of the study under subsection (a) shall 
be to derive the benefits of and further the objectives of the 
comprehensive, independent study commissioned by the Confederated 
Tribes of the Colville Reservation and the Okanagoan Irrigation 
District, which provides a credible basis for pursuing a course of 
action to simultaneously achieve fish restoration and improved 
irrigation conservation and efficiency.
    (c) Cost Share.--The Federal Government's cost share for the 
feasibility study shall not exceed 50 percent.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Lime Energy Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) to which this Certification is attached, I, Jeffrey R. Mistarz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1.                                           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: October 11, 2013 

 

 
| /s/ Jeffrey R. Mistarz                                                                        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jeffrey R. Mistarz                                                                            |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,   Treasurer & Corporate Secretary |   |

 

*This certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.*

 

1

----
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0 72 8 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 0 50 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2012

MONIQUE BARNES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DSS; MENTAL HEALTH; LEXINGTON MEDICAL CENTER; LADAWN; MS. 

FOSTER; CRYSTAL HEYWARD, RCDSS; TINA KINSLER; JHANTE 

ROBBINS; AALIYAH SINGLETON; PINE GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 

BOARD; RICHLAND COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; PALMETTO 

RICHLAND; METROPOLITAN CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY MAIN STREET; 

SONYA GOOD; MS. JETER; JUDGE JONES; ALIVIN WATSON; 

SUPERVISOR KIM GARVIN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

TINA KINSLER; PINE GROVE ELEMENTARY; JHANTE ROBBINS; 

RICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; MS. DINKY; MR. WILLIAMS; MS. 

BRADHAM; MS. WALTERS; AUBREY RAYMOND, RCSD; SCHOOL 

OFFICER HILLS; PALMETTO RICHLAND HOSPITAL; RICHLAND 1 

SCHOOL BOARD; FOREST HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY; MAIN STREET 170; 

MS. JENNIFER JETER; SONYA GOOD; EE TAYLOR ELEMENTARY; 

MENTAL HEALTH DR. PETERS; COUNSELOR AKILAH; LATONYA 

JACKSON; NICOLE WILLIAMS; DSS TERRI THOMPSON; DSS 

SUPERVISOR KIMBERLY GARVIN,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-01567-CMC)
2

Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monique Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Monique Barnes appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. DSS, No. 3:18-cv-01567-

CMC (D.S.C. Aug. 14, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32


SHEARSON AMERICAN REIT, INC.


(Formerly Known As PSA, INC.)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shearson American REIT, Inc.  for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated March 12, 2010





/s/ John WilliamsJohn WilliamsChief Executive Officer/s/ John WilliamsJohn WilliamsChief Financial Officer
#### Tubergen, Appellant, vs. Koenig, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Arnold C. Otto*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Joseph F. Schoendorf*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkona,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Alan Rudd, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Alan Rudd
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2006
### OFFICEOF THE ATTORNEYGENERAL OFTEXAS AUSTIN
**SRO ”** **~R SELLERS**  **A17DR~~~ GENERAL** 



### And **rOhtOa** 

### natters. n, whioh is as follows:

Amed Porco

Uill man that a mmber of the &rmI T.‘orcos, discharged before ooasntim of hostilities, is still entitled to pay his delinquent tax,es, free of penalties and interest, any tim before ths expiration of six (6) months from the cessation of hostilities? .:. /

.nOn,A. ,C.Winburn, page 2. I 

# a “Ir EUOh iS not .tho C&W3, in .What p0riOd Of time rust, u isoliureodnmbor of the Arncd Porocs pay No taxes, after stioh disoharee, in order to reosive tho benefits of thia BillsV1

.As your very oareful search has no,doubt revealed, theream no adjudiccted oases in the books beariN upon the qucetion asked by you. Sen3to Bill130 to this data has not been Oo55trued

### by the oourts. ;:,

It is our opinion, rather&d.from the context or bhe lot, itself, that Senate Bill 1301Soas meah, anong other thiws, 

### that,a nelnberof the .?meA ]ForcOB,nanea in tho Bill, who is discharged bofore oessntion of hostilities, is entitled to poy hiadolinquoot taxes 3ocruing subcoquent to his ontry into such aorvice, .frecof penalties and intorost , at any tiue bcforo tho Oxplration of sixmnths from the cessation 0,”hostilities,

By tho expression *delinquent taxe5",ae used in hhe proceding paragraph, we have reforenoe to tho5e delinquent taxes 3;ntloned in 3emte Xl1 130; to wit, l’...e,.on Stats and County sdvaJ.oremtaxeo on property listed on the tax rolls of any couuty In themm of any nuch aeabero of tha Armd Forces or their auxllinries, or of tho Amob Porocs Soserve of t!ieirauxiliaries, prior to the tine they joined buch Arnod i;'orcoo or suoh auxiliaries; I.,.......,,.11

or OOWSG, aftor a nerJberof the ArmeclForcen, eta., lodisohsrgefi,he or ahe is, upon and subaequant to said dioohairge, no loa~or a nenber of the scid hrcied l;'orces or auxiliaries, and oay tunes which my aocruo upon hi5 or hor property, and beoorm Winpucnt, so aoome and so becom delinquent agai.mt the P;oPcrty of 3 private citizen, who is,not ombmco& within the term of 5nid Semte Bill 130,

Ze enclose oopies of the httorhey Cmeral’s opinions !iu.;bers

O-4463, O-5566, O-5651 and O-6067, whioh MS hope will be Of som help to you in the oolution of your prablens.

tiuotinz that this amwors your qwstion, we are,
---

Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin A. Edgson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Millar
Western Forest Products Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

---

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's
internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: March 5, 2013

| | /s/ Kevin A.
      Edgson                 
| | ------------------------------------------
| |                                           
| | Kevin A. Edgson                           
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---