alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### W. M. WALTON v. W. F. McKESSON and others.

An account due by the plaintiff to one of several defendants, is not competent as a set-off against the debt which is the subject matter of the action.

Actions pending at the adoption of the 0. C. P. are to be tried under the laws previously existing.

*(Slate Bank*v. *Armstrong,*4 Dev. 523; *Jones*v. *Gilreatk,*6 Ire. 338; *Hurdle*v. *Hanner,*5 Jon. 360; *Teague*v. *James,*63 N. 0. 91; *Gaither*v. *Gibson,*Id. 93, cited and approved.)

Debt, tried before *Mitchell,*at Fall Term 1869 of Bubke Court.

The plaintiff declared upon a single bill executed to Mm by the defendants, W. F. McKesson, Charles McDowell, the intestate of the defendant N. W. Woodftn, and James McKesson, the intestate of the defendant W. F. McKesson as adm’r. The pleas were Payment and Set-off. On the trial the defendant McKesson, offered in evidence a book account alleged to be due to him by the plaintiff together with one Thomas S. Walton, as partners. This evidence was objected to by the plaintiff, and excluded by the court. The defendant excepted. Verdict for the plaintiff. Rule, &c.; Judgment, and Appeal by the defendants.

*Foils*for the appellants.

*Furches, contra.*

Rodman, J.

This suit began by writ issued March 14th 1866; and although the pleas appear not to have been put in until Fall Term 1869, it was a suit pending at the ratification of the Code of Civil Procedure, and therefore to be tried by existing laws: *Teague*v. *James,*63 N. C. 91; *Gaither*v. *Gibson,*Id. 93.

We think the cases of *State Bank*v. *Armstrong,*4 Dev. 523, and *Jones*v. *Gilreath,*6 Ire. 338, are decisive against the defendant. This case may be enlightened from *Hurdle*
      *155v. *Hanner,*5 Jon. 360, which was cited for the defendant, in this: in that case there was but one defendant, here there are several. What relief the defendant may find in the Code, it is not for us to say.

Judgment below affirmed. Let this be certified.

Pee Ctjeiam. Judgment affirmed.
EXIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sector 10, Inc. (fna SKRM Interactive, Inc).; on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Laurence A. Madison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











By:  /s/ Laurence A. Madison

Name: Laurence A. Madison

Chief Financial Officer



November 11, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000925544
<NAME> PIERCING PAGODA, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,276,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  877,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 37,383,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,096,000
<PP&E>                                      30,268,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,045,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,983,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,067,000
<BONDS>                                      2,707,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,081,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,983,000
<SALES>                                     62,683,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,683,000
<CGS>                                       36,186,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,186,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,898,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             848,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (115,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (45,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (70,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 569 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 569

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain farm 
 rental income from net earnings from self-employment if the taxpayer 
         enters into a lease agreement relating to such income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 1999

 Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Conrad, and Mr. Grams) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain farm 
 rental income from net earnings from self-employment if the taxpayer 
         enters into a lease agreement relating to such income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farm Independence Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. WRITTEN AGREEMENT RELATING TO EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN FARM RENTAL 
              INCOME FROM NET EARNINGS FROM SELF-EMPLOYMENT.

    (a) Internal Revenue Code.--Section 1402(a)(1)(A) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to net earnings from self-employment) is 
amended by striking ``an arrangement'' and inserting ``a lease 
agreement''.
    (b) Social Security Act.--Section 211(a)(1)(A) of the Social 
Security Act is amended by striking ``an arrangement'' and inserting 
``a lease agreement''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARKONA, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Leland
H. Boardman,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.,  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Leland H. Boardman
-------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
July 20, 2006
From: Jones, Danielle [ mailto:Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:57 PM

To: Cogliano, Gerain < Cogliano.Gerain@epa.gov >

Cc: Jutras, Nathaniel < Jutras.Nathaniel@epa.gov >; Farber, Glenn < Farber.Glenn@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Review of the RMP Rule

--- Clean versions of the RMP NPRM and RIA

Gerain,

The package in ROCIS is now open for Agency Amendment. Please inform OP that the files are ready to

upload.

Best,

Danielle

From: Cogliano, Gerain [ mailto:Cogliano.Gerain@epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:22 PM

To: Jones, Daniel le < Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov >

Cc: Jutras, Nathaniel < Jutras.Nathaniel@epa.gov >; Farber, Glenn < Farber.Glenn@ epa.gov >

Subject: EO 12866 Review of the RMP Rule

--- Clean versions of the RMP NPRM and RIA

Hi Danielle,

Sorry for the delay. We are have computer issues with getting the redlined versions. So while we

continue to work through the issues, here are the cle an copies of the RIA and NPRM.

Gerain
Exhibit 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Viking Systems, Inc.
File No. 000-49636



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Viking Systems,  Inc.(the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year  ended  December  31,  2004 as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report") for the purpose of complying  with
Rule  13a-14(b) or Rule  15d-14(b) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange  Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

     I, Thomas B. Marsh,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify that:

     1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d)
of the Exchange Act; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Viking Systems,
Inc.


Dated:     March 30, 2005             By:  /s/ Thomas B. Marsh
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.11



Ministry of Energy, Industry and Trade

No. 25-03-8404 dated 9/27/00

Ref.: No. 27 of 9/22/00


To: Mr. N.S. Kurmanov
General Director
Kaspiy Neft TME DOAK

The Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Investments serves as a Competent
Authority for the execution of the Contract for Exploration, Production, and
Joint Exploration and Production of Natural Resources. Since you have an
exclusive right to be granted the right for hydrocarbon production arising from
the exploration work conducted under the executed Exploration Contract
(Regulations on Granting the Rights for the Use of the Subsoil Natural
Resources, Article 3.1), you are given the right to conduct direct negotiations
and execute a Production Contract with the Competent Authority, provided that
all the exploration operations at the Alibek Yuzhny Field are completed in a
time-efficient manner.

The Ministry of Energy, Industry and Trade of the Republic of Kazakhstan is
willing to conduct expert evaluation and approval of the Yuzhny Alibek
Production Project Documentation within the time frame established by the Law.


/s/K. Bozumbaev
Vice Minister
17—2285.

#### A claim filed by Edward G. Bowzer against the estate of Charles H. Crowell, deceased, in the Probate Court of Cook county.

The claim having been disallowed by the probate court, an appeal was taken by Bowzer to the circuit court, where a trial was had before the court and a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the administratrix. The claim as originally filed was for a balance of $1,186.06, due from Crowell to Bowzer on an account stated. By an amendment filed in the probate court, the claim was stated to be for divers sums of money advanced to said Crowell at different dates from August 14, 1878, to November 29, 1878, aggregating $1,426.25, on which there remained due the sum of $1,186.06. The evidence tended to show, and the court thinks satisfactorily showed, that at the time of the transaction out of which the controversy arose, Crowell and Bowzer were copartners doing business under the firm name of C. H. Crowell & Co., and that the moneys advanced by Bowzer were »his contribution to the capital of the firm. It was claimed, however, and it was upon this theory that the case was tried, that the copartnership had been dissolved and an accounting had between said copartners, and that upon such accounting a balance was struck showing an indebtedness from Crowell to Bowzer of $1,230.06, which sum, less a credit of $44, still remained due and unpaid. The evidence tending to show an accounting and final settlement between the parties was, to say the least, very weak and unsatisfactory, and the court will not interfere with the finding of the jury that there was no such accounting. In the absence of an accounting in relation to the affairs and business of the partnership, showing a final balance in his favor, Bowzer was not entitled to a verdict for any specific amount. It is claimed, however, that so long as the evidence showed that the partnership was unsettled the court should have treated the plaintiff’s claim as praying for an adjustment and settlement of the partnership accounts, in the manner provided by the statute in relation to actions of account, and directed the jury to find the plaintiff entitled to such accounting, and that steps should have thereafter been taken under the statute to obtain an accounting by *649means of auditors. Whether it would have been competent for the court in any event to adopt the procedure hero suggested, or evento submit the matter of an accounting to the jury, is not decided, since the cause was not tried on the part of the plaintiff on any such theory. Judgment affirmed.

Judge below, John G. Bogers.

Attorneys, for plaintiff in error, Mr. 0. C. Bonnet and Mr. L. M. Paine ;

for defendant in error, Messrs. Swett, Gross-cup & Swett.

Opinion filed April 7, 1886.

Opinion by Bailey P. J.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 451 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 601
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 451

                     For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 1999

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             June 15, 2000

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Saeed Rezai 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Saeed Rezai as provided 
in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer 
to reduce by one number during the current fiscal year the total number 
of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)).

                                                       Calendar No. 601

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 451

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                     For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 15, 2000

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                  0000925665
<NAME>    SPPS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,167
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       425
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,622)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  30
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (30)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (30)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (30)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 594

To ban the importation of large capacity ammunition feeding devices.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 11, 1999

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To ban the importation of large capacity ammunition feeding

devices.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Large Capacity Ammu5 nition Magazine Import Ban Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. BAN ON IMPORTING LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNI7 TION FEEDING DEVICES.

8 Section 922(w) of title 18, United States Code, is

9 amended—
2

•S 594 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘(1) Except as

2 provided in paragraph (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘(1)(A)

3 Except as provided in subparagraph (B)’’;

4 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘(2) Para5 graph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A)’’;

6 (3) by inserting before paragraph (3) the fol7 lowing:

8 ‘‘(2) It shall be unlawful for any person to import

9 a large capacity ammunition feeding device.’’; and

10 (4) in paragraph (4)—

11 (A) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ each place it appears

12 and inserting ‘‘(1)(A)’’; and

13 (B) by striking ‘‘(2)’’ and inserting

14 ‘‘(1)(B)’’.

15 SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

16 Section 921(a)(31) of title 18, United States Code,

17 is amended by striking ‘‘manufactured after the date of

18 enactment of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforce19 ment Act of 1994’’.

Æ
Exhibit 23CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-1/S-3(No. 333-126246) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-127669, 333-125909 and 333-143308) of Leap WirelessInternational, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2007, except for Note 2 and thematters discussed in the penultimate paragraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control OverFinancial Reporting (Restated), as to which the date is December 14, 2007, relating to thefinancial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and ourreport dated May 16, 2005, except for Note 2 as to which the date is December 14, 2007, relating tothe financial statements, which appear in this Form 10-K/A./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPSan Diego, California