alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 4 AND
5 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000925548
<NAME> TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          49,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  254,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     77,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               475,252
<PP&E>                                         834,534
<DEPRECIATION>                               (100,723)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,906,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,542
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           462
<OTHER-SE>                                     559,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,906,641
<SALES>                                        923,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               923,003
<CGS>                                          788,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  788,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,895
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,360
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,535
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,566
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
        

</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 513

To designate the new hospital bed replacement building at the Ioannis A.

Lougaris Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Reno, Nevada, in honor of Jack Streeter.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 3, 1999

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. BRYAN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To designate the new hospital bed replacement building at

the Ioannis A. Lougaris Department of Veterans Affairs

Medical Center in Reno, Nevada, in honor of Jack

Streeter.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HOSPITAL BED REPLACE4 MENT BUILDING.

5 The hospital bed replacement building under con6 struction at the Ioannis A. Lougaris Department of Veter7 ans Affairs Medical Center in Reno, Nevada, is hereby

8 designated as the ‘‘Jack Streeter Building’’. Any reference
2

•S 513 IS

1 to that building in any law, regulation, map, document,

2 record, or other paper of the United States shall be consid3 ered to be a reference to the Jack Streeter Building.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 528 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-150, K2025-148.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25292 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Margaret McManus, Defendant.

Supreme Court, New York County,

January 20, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Roger J. Schwartz*for defendant. *Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Alan Buonpastore*of counsel), for plaintiff.

OPINION OF THE COURT

John A.K. Bradley, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the first count of the indictment, which charges the defendant with grand larceny in the third degree. Specifically, the Grand Jury minutes reveal that after the death of one Eugene Pogeweit, defendant’s former husband, defendant used a bank card and the appropriate PIN number to withdraw funds at an ATM from a Chemical Bank account in the name of Eugene Pogeweit in trust for Margaret Pogeweit (Ms. McManus).

*547The People allege that the account in question (commonly referred to as a Totten trust) belonged to the deceased during his lifetime, and that "only upon the filing of a death certificate and an accompanying affidavit would the monies legitimately pass to the defendant.” The People have misconstrued the legal status of a Totten trust, and the motion to dismiss must be granted.

It is well settled that "larceny” cannot be committed unless the taking, obtaining or withholding of the property of another person is from the owner of the property. *(See, People v Zinke,*137 Misc 2d 463 [NY County].)

According to the Penal Law an owner means any person who has a right to possession thereof superior to that of the taker, obtainer or withholder.

Pursuant to EPTL 7-5.2, the proper disposition of the funds in a Totten trust account is set forth in great detail. Reduced to their essentials, if the depositor survives the beneficiary, the trust terminates and title continues in the depositor. If, on the other hand, the beneficiary survives the depositor and the depositor has not revoked or otherwise affected the trust, the trust terminates and title to the funds vests in the beneficiary free and clear of the trust.

While the representative of Chemical Bank who testified before the Grand Jury stated that a death certificate and affidavit must be produced to entitle the beneficiary to the funds, the proof required by the bank in order to disburse the funds is not the relevant inquiry (it is merely a prudent banking practice). Title is the relevant inquiry under the facts and circumstances of this particular case. Title vests in the beneficiary upon the depositor’s death. Accordingly, because the defendant cannot have committed larceny if the account in fact belonged to her at the time of the withdrawals, the indictment as to count one cannot stand.

There has been no evidence presented that the decedent depositor properly revoked, before his death, the trust by a method authorized by EPTL 7-5.2 (1) or (2) but it is not clear whether such evidence can be presented.* While the first count of the indictment must be dismissed, leave to re-present is granted.

*

 EPTL 5-1.4, which provides that a divorce revokes a disposition in a will to the former spouse, does not apply to a Totten trust.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted August 29, 2013

Decided August 29, 2013

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 12

‐ 2576

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee,

v.

NIMIONWANTUE IDAHOR,

Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of

Wisconsin.

No. 11

‐ CR

‐ 240

‐ JPS

J.P. Stadtmueller,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Nimionwantue Idahor, a Nigerian citizen, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to

defraud the United States, see 18 U.S.C. § 371, by making, selling, and delivering

counterfeit

‐ U.S. currency, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 470, 472, 473, and was sentenced to 48

‐

months’ imprisonment. Idahor filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer asserts

that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738, 744 (1967). Idahor has declined to respond to counsel’s motion. See C IR

. R. 51(b). We

confine our review to the potential issues identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief.

See United States v. Schuh

, 289 F.3d 968, 973–74 (7th Cir. 2002). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 12

‐ 2576 Page 2

Counsel has determined that Idahor does not want his guilty plea set aside, and

thus counsel appropriately omits discussion about the adequacy of the plea colloquy

and the voluntariness of the plea. See United States v. Knox, 287 F.3d 667, 671–72 (7th Cir.

2002).

Counsel has not identified any basis to dispute the district court’s application of

the sentencing guidelines, leaving only the possibility of challenging the reasonableness

of the sentence, an argument that counsel correctly labels as frivolous. Idahor’s 48

‐

month sentence—within his guidelines range of 46 to 57 months—is presumed

reasonable on appeal, see United States v. Grigsby, 692 F.3d 778, 792 (7th Cir. 2012), and

counsel cannot identify any reason to disturb that presumption. The district court

explicitly rejected Idahor’s principal argument in mitigation—that he lacked legitimate

economic opportunities in Nigeria—on grounds that his plight did not excuse his

misconduct and disrespect for American law. And the court considered the appropriate

sentencing factors, weighing, on the one hand, the hardships Idahor’s family faced in

Nigeria, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), and on the other hand, the multitude of victims,

duration of the criminal activity, and serious financial implications of the offense, see id.

§ 3553(a)(2)(A); the need to protect the public, see id. § 3553(a)(2)(C); and the need to

deter Idahor and others from committing similar crimes, see id. § 3553(a)(2)(B).

The motion to withdraw is GRANTED

, and the appeal is DISMISSED

.
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Robert Harrison *et al.,*Appellants.

Assault: INDICTMENT : INTENT.

*Appeal from Jefferson District Court.*— Hon. H. C. Traverse, Judge.

Thursday, January 22, 1891.

*M. A. McCoid,*for appellants.

*John Y. Stone,*Attorney General, for appellee.

Given, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the indictment charges an assault with intent to inflict a great bodily injury. The charge is that defendants “ did with deadly weapons, to-wit, certain clubs and sticks and rails, the particular description of which is unknown to this grand jury, then and there in the hands of the said Robert Harrison, Noah Harrison, Henrietta Harrison and Alcina Harrison, upon one James Frakes, make an assault with the intent then and there unlawfully and feloniously to beat, strike, wound and bruise, and did inflict upon the hqad and person of the said James Frakes a great bodily injury, contrary to and in violation of law.” In *State v. Clark,*80 Iowa, 517, it was held that the indictment did not charge an assault with intention to inflict a great bodily injury. The charge in that case was that the defendant “did, with a deadly weapon, to-wit, a certain billiard cue, the particular description of which is to this grand jury unknown, which the said Edward Clark then and there held in his hands, make an assault upon one A. B. Haskins with intent then and there wickedly, unlawfully, maliciously and feloniously to strike and bruise, and did inflict upon the person of said A. B. Haskins a great bodily injury.” It will be seen that, as far as the charge of intent is concerned, the indictments are identical. The intent charged in this case is to beat, strike, wound and bruise, but does not charge an intent to inflict a great bodily injury. For the reasons given in *State v. Clark,*the judgment of the, district court must be reversed. .

Rothrock and Robinson, JJ., dissent, for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion filed in the case of *State v. Clark,*cited in the foregoing opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [EPA-HQ-OAR-2022-0449; FRL 10095-03-OAR]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice; correction and extension of comment period.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is correcting the Docket ID number under the                         **ADDRESSES**                         section of the                         **Federal Register**                         notice, which was published on October 16, 2024. This correction is associated with an information collection request (ICR), “GreenChill Advanced Refrigeration Partnership (Revision)” (EPA ICR No. 2349.03, OMB Control No. 2060-0702). Due to the incorrect Docket ID number in the previous notice, EPA is extending the comment period by 15 days to December 31, 2024.                    

# DATES:

The comment period has been extended until December 31, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Annie Kee, Stratospheric Protection                               ( print page 86338)                            Division—Office of Air and Radiation, (3204A), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564-2056; email address:                         *kee.annie@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 16, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-23835, on page 83495, in the second column under the                     **ADDRESSES**                     section, correct the Docket ID No. from “EPA-HQ-QAR-2022-0449” to “EPA-HQ-OAR-2022-0449”.                

Cynthia A. Newberg,

Director, Stratospheric Protection Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-25217 Filed 10-29-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     5
<LEGEND>                                      
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS,  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                         0000925054
<NAME>                                        SPECTRIAN CORP /DE/
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                                      22,758
<SECURITIES>                                                60,285
<RECEIVABLES>                                               27,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   379
<INVENTORY>                                                 17,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           130,731
<PP&E>                                                      61,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                              27,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             165,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       19,599
<BONDS>                                                      5,636
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                   147,178
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (7,247)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               165,166
<SALES>                                                     30,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            30,784
<CGS>                                                       27,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               27,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             9,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         (1,135)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (5,240)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (5,240)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (5,240)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.48)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.56

                              AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
                             EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                             --------------------


     This is an Amendment dated September 17, 2001 (the "Amendment") to the
Employment Agreement (as hereinafter defined) by and between SELECT MEDICAL
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Employer"), and ROBERT A. ORTENZIO, an
individual (the "Employee").

                                  Background
                                  ----------

     A. The Employer and the Employee executed and delivered that certain
Employment Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000, that certain Amendment No. 1 to
Employment Agreement dated as of August 8, 2000, and that certain Amendment No.
2 to Employment Agreement dated as of February 23, 2001 (as amended, the
"Employment Agreement"). The Employer and the Employee now desire to further
amend the Employment Agreement as hereinafter provided.

     B. Accordingly, and intended to be legally bound hereby, the Employer and
the Employee agree as follows:

                                   Agreement
                                   ---------

     1. Section 1.02 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated
as follows:

        "1.02 Capacity. The Employee shall serve as President and Chief
              --------
        Operating Officer of the Employer until September 17, 2001. From and
        after September 17, 2001, the Employee shall serve as the Chief
        Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer of the
        Employer."

     2. Effective as of the first of the Company's payroll periods beginning
after September 17, 2001, the Employee's base salary under Section 3.01 of the
Employment Agreement shall be increased to $800,000.

     3. Except as amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall continue in
effect in accordance with its terms.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date
first above written.

                                  SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION


                                  By:  _________________________________
                                         Michael E. Tarvin,
                                         Senior Vice President



                                  ______________________________________
                                         Robert A. Ortenzio
MDAQMD Rule 464 B-3

Final Staff Report, 08/25/2014 NOTICE OF HEARINGB-4 MDAQMD Rule 464 Final Staff Report, 08/25/2014