alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Social Cube Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:  (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|               |                       |                        
|-------------- | --------------------- | -----------------------
|April 16, 2012 | By: /s/ Byung Jin Kim | Chief Executive Officer
|Date           | Byung Jin Kim         |
<pre>

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of  the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

I, Floyd D. Wilkenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K-SB, as
amended, of Ludlum Construction Co., Inc..

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

                      /s/   FLOYD D. WILKENSON
                      ---------------------------
                      Floyd D. Wilkenson
                      Authorized Agent/Sole Director
                      Appointed by Board of Directors on
                      March 19, 2004

Dated:  December 14, 2004


Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

I, Floyd D. Wilkenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10 K-SB, as
amended, of Ludlum Construction Co., Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

                      /s/   FLOYD D. WILKENSON
                      ---------------------------
                      Floyd D. Wilkenson
                      Authorized Agent/Sole Director
                      Appointed by Board of Directors on
                      March 19, 2004

Dated:  December 14, 2004
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 54

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the corporate

alternative minimum tax.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. KYL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the corporate alternative minimum tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Corporate Tax Equity

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CORPORATE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM

7 TAX.

8 Section 55 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re9 lating to alternative minimum tax imposed) is amended

10 by adding at the end the following:
2

S 54 IS

1 ‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—In the case of a corporation,

2 this section shall not apply to taxable years beginning

3 after the date of enactment of the Corporate Tax Equity

4 Act.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Clark M. Mower, Chief Executive Officer, and John A. Sindt, Principal Financial Officer, of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Dated: November 13, 2007 /s/Clark M. Mower Clark M. Mower Chief Executive Officer   Dated: November 13, 2007 /s/John A. Sindt John A. Sindt Principal Financial Officer
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation,
as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National
Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Certificate
Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Situs Holdings LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2012-CCRE3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of
this Agreement, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services and Timothy
S. Ryan, Managing Director of Customer Relationship Managementdo hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.

|                         |  |                  
|------------------------ |  | -----------------
|Daniel Bober             |  | Timothy S. Ryan  
|Executive Vice President |  | Managing Director
|Wells Fargo Bank         |  | Wells Fargo Bank
----

**EXHIBIT 8.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

|  **Subsidiary**                      | **Incorporating Jurisdiction** |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                                      |                           |
| Intravelnet Limited.                      | Ontario, Canada                |
| InTRAVELnet Inc.                          | Alberta, Canada                |
| ATM Travel Group Ltd.                     | Alberta, Canada                |
| International Fitness Vacations (BC) Ltd. | British Columbia, Canada       |
| Price Shield Systems Inc.                 | Washington, USA                |
| American Life Settlement Society, LLC     | Deleware, USA                  |
| Colorado River Resorts, LLC               | California, USA                |

----
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO

. 02

- 12

- 00 572

- CR

BRIAN DUMONT JACKSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF COOKE COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

--------- - On November 1, 2012, t he trial court convicted Appellant Brian Dumont

Jackson of driving while intoxicated and sentenced him to three days’
confinement and an $850 fine

. Jackson timely filed a motion for new trial and
notice of appeal on November 27, 2 012

. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a), 26.2(a)(2).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

T he trial court subsequently granted his motion for new trial on December 18,
2012, and set the case for a jury trial to be held on May 14, 2013

. On January 9, 2013, we notified Jackson that the appeal app ears to be

moot because the trial court granted his motion for new trial

. See Tex. R. App. P.
21.9(b). We requested that he file a response stating grounds to continue the
appeal on or before January 2 2 , 2013
, if he desired to continue the appeal

. See

T ex. R. App. P. 44.3

. No response was filed.
Accordingly
, because the trial court granted Jackson’s motion for new trial,
making any appeal from the original judgment moot, we dismiss th is appeal. See
Tex. R. App. P. 21.9(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL : WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )

DELIVERED: May 2, 2013
1997 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

9-12-1997

Martin v. Dana Corp

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 96-1746

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1997 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Martin v. Dana Corp" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 216.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/216
Filed July 1, 1997 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

NO. 96-1746 

KEEFE M. MARTIN, 

Appellant

v. 

DANA CORPORATION 

On Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 

(D.C. No. 95-cv-08024) 

Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, 

MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, 

ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, and McKEE, Circuit Judges. 

ORDER 

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing 

en banc in the above appeal, it is 

O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the 

opinion filed June 12, 1997 and list the above case for 

rehearing en banc at the convenience of the court. 

By the Court, 

/s/ Dolores K. Sloviter 

Chief Judge 

Dated: July 1, 1997
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Panamersa Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James E. Finegan, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ James FineganJames E. Finegan, TreasurerDated:
February 23, 2011
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.  §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MovieGallery, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form l0-Q for the period ended October 5,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,J. T. Malugen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge:

##### ** **

##### **(1)**                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

##### ** **

##### **(2)**                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/  J. T. Malugen |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| J. T. Malugen           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 19, 2003       |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0204

SAT Date: 1/18/2013

Print Date: 4/1/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORROSION, LUNG, 

UNCERT-SENS-DERMAL/RESPIRATORY, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0200-09

FATE: Estimations for MW 441 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 5.01 (E) 

S = Disp. / 1.38 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.86 (E)
log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)

log Fish BAF = 1.82 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 75-90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation and 

possible corrosion based on the and concern for lung effects if respirable particles are 

inhaled based on cationic binding to lung tissues and the surfactant properties of the PMN 

material. There is also uncertain concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization based on 

smaller . Moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.15

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.025

green algal 96-h EC50 0.010

fish _ chronic value 0.002

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.004

algal _ chronic 

value

0.004

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; 

SAR chemical class = MW 325 (major component); liquid; log Kow = 

5.97 (EPI); S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% 

active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and 

TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs includes molecular weight adjustment

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
#### Singer, Appellant, vs. Horn, Administratrix, and another, Respondents.

*March 12*

April *7, 1942.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Charles Swidler,*and oral argument by *Max E. Goldsmith,*both of Milwaukee.'

For the respondents there was a brief by *Hayes & Hayes,*attorneys, and *William A. Hayes*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *William A. El ayes.*

Fowler, J.

The case was called when reached on the day calendar of March 12, 1942. The clerk’s minutes recite that *311the respondents then moved to strike the bill of exceptions. The file of the case contains no bill of exceptions. The brief of appellant only assigns as error, (1) refusal to grant a new trial because the verdict “was perverse on the question of dajm-ages awarded to the plaintiff,” and (2) refusal to change the answers to questions as moved by the plaintiff. It is obvious that if there is no bill of exceptions this court cannot review the case for the errors assigned. *Rosenow v. Schmidt,*232 Wis. 1, 285 N. W. 755; *Meyers v. Thorpe,*227 Wis. 200, 278 N. W. 462. In such case the judgment must be affirmed if the verdict on its face supports it, and the instant verdict supports it.

The appellant claims that he is entitled to rely as the bill of exceptions in this case on a purported bill in the record of the case of *Horn, Adm’rx v. Snow White Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co., Maurice Singer and General Accident Ins. Co., post,*p. 312, which involved the same accident and was tried with it. This proposed bill is designated on the cover as “Bill of Exceptions,” and is entitled as in both the instant and the companion case. It is also so entitled on the first page thereof.

■ But we do not find in the record of either case that the plaintiff in the instant case ever moved or asked for the settlement of a bill of exceptions or served any proposed bill, and respondents’ counsel assert that none such was ever moved or asked or served in plaintiff’s behalf; nor did the respondents or their counsel ever consent or stipulate as to the signing or settling of a bill of exceptions in the instant case. In this situation we must hold that there is no bill of exceptions in the instant case and that judgment of the circuit court must be affirme'd.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3088

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to promulgate

regulations regarding allowable costs under the Medicaid program for

school based services provided to children with disabilities.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 21, 2000

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services

to promulgate regulations regarding allowable costs

under the Medicaid program for school based services

provided to children with disabilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ALLOWABLE MEDICAID COSTS FOR SCHOOL4 BASED SERVICES PROVIDED TO CHILDREN

5 WITH DISABILITIES.

6 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment

7 of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services

8 and the Secretary of Education shall issue proposed regu-
2

•S 3088 IS

1 lations after consultation with the National Governors’ As2 sociation, the National Association of State Directors of

3 Special Education, the American Association of Edu4 cational Service Agencies, the American Public Human

5 Services Administration, and other interested groups re6 lating to allowable costs under the administrative outreach

7 program of the school based services program that is part

8 of the Medicaid program established under title XIX of

9 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) with re10 spect to services provided to children with disabilities. Any

11 claim that is reasonably based on guidance provided orally

12 or in writing by an officer or employee of a regional or

13 national office of the Health Care Financing Administra14 tion submitted with respect to such services prior to the

15 publication of final regulations may not be deferred or dis16 allowed.

Æ
---

---

# Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of B.V.R. Systems (1998) Ltd (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Reuven Shahar,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 27, 2005

| |  | /S/ Reuven Shahar
Reuven ShaharChief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q/A (AMENDMENT #1) FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. PRIMARY AND DILUTED
EARNINGS PER SHARE REPRESENT EARNINGS PER SHARE OF THE COMPANY'S TCI GROUP
STOCK. SEE THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      539
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          11,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         14,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              312
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,540
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,885
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,872
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   434
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    586
<INCOME-TAX>                                       240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                346
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38 
        

</TABLE>