CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Placer County Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): 218 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: October 14, 2010

Rule Title(s): Architectural Coatings

Date Submitted to ARB: N o vember 8, 2010

If an Amended Rule, D ate Last Amended (or Adopted): December 13, 2001

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Bruce Springsteen Phone Number: (530) 745

- 2337 E

- mail Address: bsprings@placer.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Revised based on the California Air Resources Board Suggested Control Measure (October 2005)

Pollutant(s) Re gulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in qua ntifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: 0. 2 tons/day of ROG in 2018 committed in Sacramento

Regional 8

- hr Ozone Attainment Plan (SIP)

Inventory Year Used to C alculate Changes in Emissions: 2018 Area Affected: Placer County

Future Year Control Profile Estima te (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

0.83CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: 2018

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: 0.2 tons/day of ROG committed in 2018

Revised Baseli ne Inventory (if any): 2008

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): 0.18 tons/day of ROG based on 2008 emission inventory

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approx imate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: many

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 90 %

Number of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: None Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : None

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 301 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: ROG limits in coatings

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 30 1, 302 Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 304

Recordkeeping Require ments in Section(s): 502 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 501CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: VOC reductions help reduce ozone, and will help to achieve attainment with ozone standards in the

Sacramento Valley and Mountain Counties