alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 24, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 480 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-84, K2025-82.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24604 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Murray Nicol, Vice President and chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    MURRAY
NICOL                                    
|Murray Nicol Vice President and chief financial officer



April
2, 2007
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunburst Acquisitions VII, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-KSB  for the period ending  June 30, 2003
(the "Report"),  I, Jay Lutsky,  Principal  Executive  Officer of  the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Jay Lutsky
-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
November 8, 2005
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
              MAURICE B. NEWMAN AND THE SIRENA APPAREL GROUP, INC.


               This Amendment (the "Amendment"), dated as of July 1, 1998, is
entered into by and between Maurice B. Newman (the "Employee") and The Sirena
Apparel Group, Inc. (the "Company") and amends that certain Employment
Agreement, effective as of September 29, 1997, by and between the Company and
the Employee (the "Agreement").

               NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein and in the Agreement, the
parties hereto agree that all references to "Chief Operating Officer" contained
in the Agreement, which two references are in Sections 1.1 and 3.2(e), have been
amended to read in full as "Chief Executive Officer."

               All other provisions of the Agreement shall be unaffected by this
Amendment and shall remain in full force and effect.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Employee have caused this
Amendment to be executed as of the date set forth above.


                                   THE SIRENA APPAREL GROUP, INC.


                                   By:  /s/ Douglas Arbetman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Douglas Arbetman, Vice Chairman and
                                        President

                                        /s/ Maurice B. Newman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Maurice B. Newman


                                        1
**Exhibit 10.11**

 

**DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY**

 

The annual retainer for the directors is $20,000. Of thisamount, $5,000 is paid in common shares of the Company. 

 

In addition to the annual retainer, the directors are also paid $700 per half day for each board meeting and $175 per hour for each committee meeting attended during the calendar year. Directors areentitled to receive compensation and reimbursement for expenses incurred in attending board or committee meetings or when otherwise acting on our behalf. The chairman of the board, as well as the chairman of the audit committee, receive anadditional annual retainer of $10,000. The chairmen of all other committees receive an additional retainer of $5,000.
September 16, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Meeting with Southern Company

Attendees :

Robert J. Wayland, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Bill Maxwell, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Nick Hutson, EPA/ OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Christian Fellner, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Brian Toth, Southern Company Kim Adelberg, Southern Company Brandon Looney, Southern Company Sarah Markham, Southern Company

Discussion :

A general discussion was held of the comments submitted by Southern Company on the proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 25, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 538 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-161, K2025-159.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25310 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 07/31/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Moffat County Commissioner Meeting held on 07/29/2014

SUMMARY: 

On July 29, 2014, Shaun McGrath, EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator, and Callie Videtich, Acting 

Assistant Regional Administrator, met with Moffat County Commissioner, John Kinkaid, and Craig City 

Councilmember, Ray Beck, to discuss Region 8’s participation in a meeting on the proposed Clean Power 

Plan for Existing Power Plants to be held by the County Commissioners in September in Craig, Colorado. 

The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

Shaun McGrath, EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator

Callie Videtich, Acting Assistant Regional Administrator

Moffat County Commissioner, John Kinkaid

Craig City Councilmember, Ray Beck
CHIEF JUSTICE

 CAROLYN WRIGHT

JUSTICES

 DAVID L. BRIDGES

 MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

 KERRY P. FITZGERALD

 MOLLY FRANCIS

 DOUGLAS S. LANG

 ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

 ROBERT M. FILLMORE

 LANA MYERS

 DAVID EVANS

 DAVID LEWIS

 ADA BROWN

 CRAIG STODDART

LISA MATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712-3450

theclerk@5th.txcourts.gov

GAYLE HUMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

(214) 712-3434

gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov

FACSIMILE

(214) 745-1083

INTERNET

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/5THCOA.ASPX

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200

DALLAS, TEXAS 75202

(214) 712-3400

November 25, 2014

Mr. Odis Jones, Jr.

TDCJ No. 1384596

McConnell Unit

3001 S. Emily Drive

Beeville, Texas 78102

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 05-06-01252-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 2-06-84

Style: Jones, Odis

v. 

The State of Texas

We are in receipt of your correspondence regarding the record. The mandate in the above 

listed case issued on August 21, 2007. Thus, we no longer have jurisdiction over the case. 

However, if you would like copies of the record, the cost is ten cents ($0.10) per page. Both the 

clerk’s and reporter’s records total 477 pages. The total cost, payable in advance, is $47.70.

Respectfully,

/s/ Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,209
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,315<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    128,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,135
<PP&E>                                         261,346<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 625,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,968
<BONDS>                                        317,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   625,276
<SALES>                                        184,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,515
<CGS>                                          168,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,215)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,199
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,961)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,961)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Amounts presented are net.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### A. M. Worden, Appellant, v. Chicago & Northwestern Railroad Company, Appellee.

^Executory Contracts: rescinded by assignment for benefit of . creditors.

*.Appeal from Polk District Court.*— Hon. Charles A. Bishop, Judge.

Thursday, February 5, 1891.

Action for a breach of contract. The defendant’s'denmrrer to the petition being sustained, and the plaintiff electing to stand upon his petition, judgment was entered dismissing the same, from which he appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*A. A. Haskins,*for appellant.

*N. M. Hubbard, Jr.,*for appellee.

Given, J.

The petition shows that the Polk County Coal Company ■made an offer in writing to the purchasing agent of +he defendant to •furnish from one to two cars of lump coal per day for one year from ■July 1, 1888, at one dollar and fifty cents per ton at the mine, from a certain vein, upon certain conditions that need not be named, which offer was accepted. That on March 16,1889, said coal company made a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors ; and on the twenty^ fourth of that month John B. Gibson purchased of the assignee the property of said coal company, including the contract in suit. That Gibson demanded of the defendant to take and pay for coal under the contract, which it refused to do. That on October 21, 1889, the plaintiff, for valuable consideration, purchased of Gibson his claim for damages against the defendant by reason of such failure ; and that the profits to Gibson under the contract would have been twenty-five hundred dollars.- The demurrer is upon the ground that the facts stated in the petition do not entitle the plaintiff to the relief asked, nor to any relief, for the reason that the alleged contract between the defendant and the Polk Bounty Coal Company.is notin law assignable, and said attempted assignment is of no effect. The very able and learned arguments of counsel, both oral and in print, and their extended citations of authorities, show that there is a decided conflict in the opinions of the courts upon this question. The question, however, is not an open one in this state. It was fully settled in *Rappleye v. Seeder Co.,*79 Iowa, 220, wherein all the arguments of appellant are fully answered. In that case it is held that Young Bros., who held a contract with defendant for the future sale and delivery of a certain make of seeders, could not, by assignment for the benefit of their creditors, compel the defendant to accept the assignee to perform the contract instead of themselves.

Following that case, we think the judgment of the district court .should be affirmed. . .
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7028** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. RYAN DUANE DENT, a/k/a Little Man, a/k/a Man Dingo, a/k/a Dingo , Defendant

- Appellant

.

**No. 12**  **- 7079** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. RYAN DUANE DENT, a/k/a Little Man, a/k/a Man Dingo, a/k/a Dingo , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg

. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. ( 5:09

- cr
- 00016

- GEC

- 1 )

Submitted : November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and D IAZ , Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Ryan Duane Dent, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Ryan Duane Dent appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of it s order granting his

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. *
Because the district court lacked authority to rec onsider its
disposition of Dent’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, see United States v.
Goodwyn , 596 F.3d 233, 235

- 36 (4th Cir. 2010), we affirm the

district court’s order. See United States v. Dent , No. 5:09

- cr
00016

- GEC

- 1 (W.D. Va. May 29, 2012). We deny Dent’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court granted Dent’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Dent’s sentence to the full extent he requested.
[HUMATECH, INC. LETTERHEAD]

October 22, 2001

Terry Williams
1926 East Cypress Tree Drive
Gilbert, Arizona 85234

Dear Sir,

As agreed, the Board of Directors of HumaTech, Inc. has fully authorized the
issuance of 50,000 shares of unrestricted common stock in Humatech, Inc. This
is issued to you for work performed for the benefit of HumaTech, Inc.

Thank you,

/s/ David Williams                     /s/ Terry Williams
__________________                     ___________________________
David Williams                         Accepted, Terry Williams
President, CEO
HumaTech, Inc.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 2000 500 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 503 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-120, K2025-118.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25256 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Raleigh, NC Site

Information Provided by Nick Scappini, HaloSource

08/26/2010 01:31 AM

Jesse

- this is from a Raleigh site with NTUs at 2500

- 3000 and we were able to achieve with the Dual

Polymer System NTU levels of under 20! It will get repetitive but this new technology can treat literally

any soil at any turbidity level, any ph level wit h a simple trash pump, some pvc and some sort of low

grade filtration like a geotextile bag or waddle. WE have yet to get any NTU readings above 40NTU.

Attached is multiple projects we have done with Hanes over the past couple of months with the exact

sam e treatment train you see in the pics and have seen in the drawings.

NCDOT2

NCDOT3 NCDOT4NCDOT5 NCDOT6

NCDOT7

## Reducing NTU with StormKlear Dual Biopolymer Systems

Memphis, TN (TDOT)

1200 NTU influent

200 gpm ‐ 2.5 mg/L: 20 NTU

Jacksonville, NC (NCDENR)

300 NTU influent (discharge to marsh)

300 gpm ‐ 2.0 mg/L: 15 NTU

Birmingham, AL (Grand River)

1500 NTU influent

600 gpm – 3.0 mg/L: 20 NTU Raleigh, NC (NCDOT I

‐ 540)

2500

‐ 3000 NTU influent

200 gpm – 5.0 mg/L: 14 NTU

Austin, TX (City of Austin)

600 NTU influent

300 gpm – 5.0 mg/L:10 NTU

Annapolis, MD (AA County & MDE)

300 NTU influent

300 gpm – 5.0 mg/L: 15 NTU Dewatering activities are becoming more scrutinized these days, especially given the new Effluent

Limitation Guidelines enacted by EPA and Congress late last year. However, with a simple setup using a

PVC manifold and StormKlear’s New Dual Biopolymer System in 1 kg Segmented Geosynthetic Socks,

you can consistently achieve discharge NTU levels that rival full active treatment for a fraction of the

cost.

For additional information or to schedule an on

‐ site demonstration, give us a call or send an email

with the project details to: bobby.starling@hanescompanies.com

Recent trials: