alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State v. Behm.

1. Manslaughter: exposing inf ant: indictment. An indictment for manslaughter committed by a mother in exposing to the inclemency of the weather her new-born infant, which charges the defendant with being guilty of wrongful acts which created the exposure in part, and that it was of such exposure that the child died, and which charges in substance that it died from the exposure created by the defendant, is not defective in failing to state that the defendant was bound to provide for and protect the child, nor in failing to charge that the child was unable to help itself.

*Appeal from Dubuque District Court*— HoN. O. E. Couch, *Judge.*

Tuesday, October 11.

The defendant, Maggie Behm, was convicted of the crime of manslaughter, and sentenced to imprisonment in tbe penitentiary for the term of one year. She appeals.

*J. C. Longwville,*for appellant.

*A. J. Baker, Attorney-general,*for the State.

Adams, Ch. J.

The defendant moved in arrest of judgment, on the ground that the indictment fails to charge an indictable offense. The court overruled the motion, and the overruling is assigned as error. The indictment charges that “ the defendant did willfully and feloniously make an assault in and upon a certain male child which had then and there been born alive to the said Maggie Behm, with the specific intent by the said Maggie Behm' then and there unlawfully and feloniously the said child to kill and murder ; and the said Maggie Behm did then and there unlawfully and felon-iously, and with the specific intent to kill and murder said child, with both her hands put and place said child in a certain outhouse, and then and there did unlawfully and felon-iously desert and leave said child exposed to the inclemency *534of the weather, without sufficient clothing, covering, shelter, and protection for the body of said child, of and from which exposure, so unlawfully and feloniously made by said Maggie ■Behm, with intent as aforesaid, said child then and there did die.”

One of the defendant’s objections to the indictment is that it does not allege that the defendant was in duty bound to provide for and protect the child. To this we have to say that the position might be well taken if the charge was simply that the defendant willfully and feloniously caused the death of the child by neglecting it. But the indictment charges much more than that. It charges the defendant with being guilty of wrongful acts which created the exposure in part, and charges that it was of such exposure that the child died.

Another objection made to the indictment is that it does not charge that the child was unable to help itself. But it charges, in substance, that it died from the exposure created by the defendant. If the child could have helped itself, and had voluntarily remained where it had been placed by the defendant, then it would itself have caused its exposure by its own volition, and in no proper sense could it have been said that it died of the exposure caused by the defendant, as the indictment charges. We think that the district court did not err in overruling the motion in arrest of judgment.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       STATE OR OTHER
                                                                       JURISDICTION OF           PERCENTAGE
                                                                       INCORPORATION             OWNERSHIP
PARENT                                                                 ---------------           ----------
-------
<S>                                                                    <C>                         <C>
CFS Bancshares, Inc.                                                   Delaware                    N/A


SUBSIDIARY (1)
----------

Citizens Federal Savings Bank                                          United States               100%


Subsidiaries of Citizens Federal Savings Bank (1)
-------------------------------------------------

Citizens Service Corporation                                           Alabama                     100%

<FN>
_____________
(1)  The assets,  liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in
     the consolidated  financial  statements  contained in this Annual Report on
     Form 10-KSB.
</FN>
</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ALAN B. YERMAL, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D22-2222

LT Case No. 2010-CF-000639

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

 Appellee. 

_______________________________/ 

Decision filed February 21, 2023

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Citrus County, 

Richard A. Howard, Judge.

Alan B. Yermal, Bushnell, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, HARRIS and JAY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flexpoint
Sensor Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), we, Clark M. Mower, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director and John A. Sindt, Chairman of the Board and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.  Dated: May 14, 2008 /*s/Clark M. Mower* Clark M. Mower President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director   Dated: May 14, 2008 /*s/John A. Sindt* John A. Sindt Chairman of the Board Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         159,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,195,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   280,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,746,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,540,000
<PP&E>                                       5,607,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,643,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,992,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,505,000
<BONDS>                                        219,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,992,000
<SALES>                                      2,296,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,296,000
<CGS>                                        1,702,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,729,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,224,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,224,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND AS OF
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                  0000925665
<NAME>    SPPS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,167
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       425
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,592)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
#### TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY *vs.*EDMUND D. McNAIR’S EXECUTORS.

Where a person boards and supports another from motives of charity, without any intention of charging for her expenditures, he cannot, when the object of his charity subsequently becomes possessed of property, charge her or her representatives with the amont so expended — either at law or in equity.

This cause was transmitted for a final hearing from the Court of Equity of Edgcombe county, at Fall Term 1842, to this Court.

The facts are stated in the opinion here delivered.

*Badger and the Attorney General*for the plaintiff.

*J H. Bryan*for the defendant..

Daniel, J.

Catharine Darby, an indigent "lady, in the year 1810, came to the house of the defendant, where she was kindly received, and lived on terms of friendship and equality with the family, until the year 1824, when she died, leaving no issue-. During all that time the defendant maintained her, but never made- any charge for her board and-maintenance-or intimated a design to do so. A Mrs. Blount made her will and left C. Darby a legacy,, and died just before C. Darby did. In the year 1832, the defendant administered on the estate of C. Darby, and, as such, took into his possession the said legacy. The next of kin not making any application in seven years for the said fund, the plaintiffs, by virtue of atr act of Assembly, claimed the fund, and have filed this bill to obtain it. The case now comes before *608ns upon an exception by the defendant to the report of the master¡ that he had not been allowed the sum of $60 per year for the board of C. Darby, from-the year 1810 to the year 1824. In looking into the defendant’s answer, his examination before the master, and the deposition of Mary Parker, it appears to us, that Mr. McNair boarded C. Darby the time mentioned from motives of charity, kindness, and benevolence, or in other words he gave her the boardl The circumstance of the legacy coming to her afterwards, does not, either in law or equity, authorize him now to raise this charge. We think, that the exception must be overruled, and that the report must be confirmed, and' a decree entered for the plaintiffs accordingly.

Per Curiam. Decree accordingly.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-60219

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEWIS H. ALTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:98-CR-127-ALL-D

_________________________________________________________________

October 5, 1999

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lewis H. Alton appeals his bench trial conviction for willful

failure to pay a past due child support obligation. We find the

district court’s holding that Alton’s failure to pay child support

was “willful” is supported by sufficient evidence. See United

States v. Mathes, 151 F.3d 251, 253 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied,

119 S.Ct. 628 (1998). The evidence, viewed in the light most

favorable to the verdict, shows that Alton chose to withhold child

support because of frustration with his inability to modify his
2

visitation rights. The evidence further shows that Alton had

sufficient income to fulfill his support obligation.

We also hold that the district court did not err in failing to

credit a “gift” of a Jeep Wrangler against the child support

arrearage. The vehicle’s title remained in Alton’s name; Alton

counted it as an asset; the vehicle was not purchased during the

relevant years for which Alton was convicted of nonpayment; and

there was no agreement--formal or informal--that the purchase of

the vehicle would modify the state child support judgment. See

United States v. Bailey, 115 F.3d 1222, 1232 (5th Cir. 1997), cert.

denied, 118 S.Ct. 866 (1998).

A F F I R M E D.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1140

JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JND HANDYMAN SERVICE.ORG; JEROME JULIUS BROWN, JR.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. 

(1:12-cv-03110-ELH)

Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: July 15, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was 

not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on November 1, 2012. The notice of appeal was filed on 

January 25, 2013. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(d). Because Brown 

failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an 

extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Please submit the attached Denial Letter to JetBlue Airways Corporation (Docket No.  FAA-2013-0764).  If granted, that exemption would allow JetBlue to delay implementing 14 CFR part 117 until the period between January 7, 2014 and January 31, 2014.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 208 (Monday, October 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85573-85574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25077]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 31, 2024.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.


[[Page 85574]]


    Dated: October 24, 2024.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-25077 Filed 10-24-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
EXIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sector 10, Inc.; on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Pericles DeAvila, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:  /s/ Pericles DeAvila




Name: Pericles DeAvila


Principal Executive Officer




February 22, 2011





---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENTS  FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925666
<NAME> WOODLAKE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,001
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,822)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  30
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (30)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (30)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (30)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
#### H. T. Bell, Appellant, v. Anna Glaseker *et al.,*Appellees.

Intoxicating Liquors: nuisance : injunction : practice.

*Appeal from Lee District Court.*— Hon. J. M. Casey, Judge.

Thursday, February 5, 1891.

Action to abate a saloon nuisance. The defendants are Anna Glaseker, Henry Schlopp and Joseph Smith. The defendant, Joseph Smith, was by the evidence shown to be the keeper of a saloon, and enjoined as prayed in the petition. The petition states that the other defendants are owners and lessors of the property where the saloon was maintained, asks that they be enjoined also, which the district court refused, and gave judgment dismissing them, with costs, from which the plaintiff *appeals.*

Reversed.

*Newman & Blalce,*for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.

Granger, J.

The record does not disclose the reasons for the action of the court in dismissing the appellees. It is said in argument by appellant that it must have overlooked the facts as presented by the pleadings. The petition states that appellees are the owners and lessors of the place constituting the nuisance, and the allegation is not denied, and under Code, section 2712, it must be taken as admitted. It is also apparent from the record that these defendants had knowledge of how the premises were used. Under such condition of the record, the prayer of the petition, as to the appellees, should have been granted, and a decree to that effect will be entered .in this court, with an attorney’s fee of twenty-five dollars for the appeal. Reversed.