alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84940-84941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 473 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 84941]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-77, K2025-75.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24597 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Order filed November 1, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00789

- CV

____________ BRAZORIA COUNTY FORD , LP AND KIRK L. BRA NNAN , Appellant s
V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, MARK WIGGINS FORD ME RCURY, INC.,

AND MARK WIGGINS, IN DIVI DUALLY , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 30601



### ORDER
On October 25, 2016, appellant Kirk L. Brannan filed an affidavit of indigence in this court. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(b)( 1) provides that when a statement of inability to afford payment of costs was filed in the trial court, the party’s indigence status in the trial court carries forward on appeal. The exception to this rule is when the party files a motion alleging the part y’s financial circumstanceshave materially changed since the date of the trial court’s order. Tex. R. App. P.

20.1(3). The clerk’s record has not been filed in this appeal. This court has not been advised whether appellant filed a statement of inability to afford payment of costs in the trial court, whether the statement was contested, or the ruling on any contest, if

any. To determine appellant’s indigent status , we issue the following order for a partial clerk’s record.

We order the Brazoria County Dist rict Clerk to file a partial clerk’s record
with the clerk of this court on or before November 16 , 201 6 (15 days)

. T he partial
clerk’s record shall contain (1) the judgment being appealed; (2) any motion for new trial, other post

-

judgment motion, or reques t for findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (3) the notice of appeal. In addition, the partial clerk’s record shall
contain: (4) appellant’s statement of inability to afford payment of costs ; (5) the contest(s) to the statement , if any; (6) the tria l court’s order ruling on any contest;
and (7) any other documents pertaining to the claim of indigence and the contests
thereto.

PER CURIAM
Filed 07/22/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court



### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOT A

2020 ND 163

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Ryan Michael Lindquist, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20200022

Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland , Judge.

AFFIRMED

.
Per Curiam

.
Ladd R. Erickson, State’s Attorney, Washburn, ND

, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, ND

, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.1 State v. Lindquist No. 20200022

Per Curiam

. [¶1] Ryan Lindquist a ppeals from a criminal judgment after entering conditional pleas following an order denying his motion to suppress. On appeal, Lindquist states his “main contention upon [his] motion to suppress was that because Lindquist was immedi ately detained at the scene . . . [ his ] detention was violative of Lindquist’s Fourth Amendment r ights.” While Lindquist makes a conclusory statement that his detention was unlawful, he failed to adequately develop an argument in support of this contention. The district court’s findings have adequate support in the record. “Our Court will
not consi der an argument that is not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed.” State v. Bachmeier , 2007 ND 42, ¶ 10, 729 N.W.2d 141. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App. P. 35.1(a)(2),(7).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Gerald W. VandeWalle
II

Calendar No. 601

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 451

For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JUNE 15, 2000

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

A BILL

For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Saeed Rezai shall be held and considered

7 to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for

8 permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of

9 this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.
2

S 451 RS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Saeed

3 Rezai as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall

4 instruct the proper officer to reduce by one number during

5 the current fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas

6 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth

7 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
Calendar No. 601

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 451

A BILL

For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

JUNE 15, 2000

Reported without amendment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         402,666
<SECURITIES>                                   111,714
<RECEIVABLES>                                  261,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     49,986
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               899,514
<PP&E>                                         133,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,818)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,073,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,967
<BONDS>                                          7,196
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,220
<OTHER-SE>                                     888,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,073,767
<SALES>                                        426,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               426,083
<CGS>                                           73,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,165,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (932,349)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (932,349)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (932,349)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TODD JASON DERRY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D20-311 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 16, 2020. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Gilbert A. Smith, Jr., Judge. Todd Jason Derry, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. MORRIS, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Concur.
#### Will of Razall: Razall, Appellant, vs. Razall and others, Respondents.*

*March 14*

June *6, 1944.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Lorens & Neubauer*of Milwaukee, for the respondent Bernard F. Mathiowetz on the brief of *Bernard F. Mathiowetz*of Milwaukee, *in pro. per.,*and for the respondent Catherine Razall Kaufmann on the brief of *Hammersley, Torke & Kelley*of Milwaukee.

*

 Motion for rehearing denied, without costs, on September 12,1944.

Fairchild, J.

While Mr. Justice Fritz was still on the circuit court, issues in the divorce action were before him. Therefore, he is not sitting in the consideration of this appeal.

The remaining members of the court are equally divided. Mr. Justice Wickhem, Mr. Justice Martin, and the writer are of the opinion that the order should be reversed. Mr. *427Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fowler, and Mr. Justice Barlow are of the opinion that the order should be affirmed.

Under the rule, the order appealed from is affirmed.

*-By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
### -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5 39.0 39.5


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/24 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Eugene V. McMahon v. Marcia Zimmerman, Individually, and the 

Zimmerman Law Firm, L.L.P.

Appellate case number: 01-12-01090-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-37680

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

Appellees, Marcia Zimmerman and the Zimmerman Law Firm, L.L.P., have filed a 

“Motion for Involuntary Dismissal in Civil Case.” In their motion, Zimmerman and the 

Zimmerman Law Firm request dismissal of this case based on the alleged failure to comply with 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1 by appellant, Eugene V. McMahon. In his response, 

McMahon “recognize[d] the defects cited by Appellees [sic] motion and respectfully request[ed] 

the opportunity to re-brief to cure the defects.” McMahon also filed a “Motion for Extension of 

Time to Refile Brief to Cure Procedural Defects in Civil Case,” seeking “at least ten (10) 

additional days” to correct his brief. Finally, McMahon re-filed his motion for extension with a 

certificate of conference indicating that Zimmerman and the Zimmerman Law Firm have agreed 

to his motion.

Neither the statement of the case nor the statement of facts in McMahon’s brief contains

any references to the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(d), (g). Further, McMahon failed to 

include a copy of the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in the appendix.1 See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(k)(1)(B). Nevertheless, briefing rules are to be liberally construed, 

substantial compliance with Rule 38 is sufficient, and we must permit a party to amend, 

supplement, or redraw a brief even when Rule 38 has been flagrantly violated. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 38.9.

Accordingly, we GRANT McMahon’s agreed motion for an extension of time, DISMISS 

McMahon’s non-agreed motion as moot, and DENY Zimmerman and the Zimmerman Law 

Firm’s motion for involuntary dismissal. We further ORDER McMahon to file an amended 

 

1 Zimmerman and the Zimmerman Law Firm also contend that McMahon’s brief fails “to 

make appropriate citations to the record when presenting several purported facts,” citing 

to Rule 38.1(h). Rule 38.1(h), however, applies to the summary of the argument and does 

not require record references. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(h).
brief, containing all necessary references to the record and conforming to Rule 38.1, no later than 

August 13, 2013. Zimmerman and the Zimmerman Law Firm’s brief will be due no later than 30 

days after the date McMahon’s amended motion is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 26, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Infinicall   Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James A. Trodden, Interim Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ James A. Trodden

Interim Chief Financial Officer

September 18, 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

RICHARD R. LAUFER III,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 30228

D.C. No. 1:16

- cr

- 00121

- SPW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15

, 2018 **

Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Richard R. Laufer

, III

, appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 63

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for

being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § § 922(g) (1) and

924(a)(2) . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 30228

Laufer argues that the district court procedurally erred by treating a sentence

within the Guidelines range as presumptively reasonable and failing to consider

whether a below

- Guidelines sentence was warranted under the 18 U .S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia

Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none.

The record reflects that the court understood that it could vary below the

Guidel ines range, considered Laufer’s arguments for doing so, and was

unpersuaded that a downward variance was warranted under the section 3553(a)

sentencing factors

.

Laufer also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because

a lower sente nce would have satisfied the goals of sentencing. The district court

did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

The within

- Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the section

3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the serious nature

of the crime, Laufer’s extensive criminal history, the fact that Laufer was on

supervised release for a prior felony conviction at the time of the instant offense

,

and the danger to the commun ity posed by Laufer’s possession of drugs and

firearms

. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51

.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         146,172
<SECURITIES>                                    23,612
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,071
<INVENTORY>                                      1,433
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               179,639
<PP&E>                                         200,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 686,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,447
<BONDS>                                        463,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   686,859
<SALES>                                            755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,578
<CGS>                                            1,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,969
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,740)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 570 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 570

  To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to eliminate 2 
vacant judgeships on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 1999

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to eliminate 2 
vacant judgeships on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF VACANT JUDGESHIPS ON FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF 
              APPEALS.

    Section 44(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended in the 
table by striking the item relating to the Fourth Circuit and inserting 
the following:

    ``Fourth......................................                13''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Timeshare Holdings, Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




May
      28, 2008
            
            /s/
      Paul ThompsonPaul
      ThompsonChief
      Executive Officer
##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED
SYSTEM EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND
NORTEL NETWORKS INC.
 Cricket Communications, Inc Nortel Networks Inc
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 1.
    
    Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as in the
Contract.2.
    
    Delete Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Attachment 1 to Amendment No. 3 in their entirety and replace
with the following:
  3.
    
    Except as specifically modified by Amendment No. 4, the Contract in all other respects
shall continue in full force and effect.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
    
    
    
    NORTEL NETWORKS INC.By:
    

/s/
John Salove
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Lance LevinName:
    
    John Salove
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Lance Levin(Type/Print)
    
    
    
    
    
    (Type/Print)Title:
    
    VP Engineering
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    Counsel, North AmericaDate:
    
    12-21-05
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    12-22-05