alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COFFEE PEOPLE, INC.

<TABLE>
                                                CALCULATIONS OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<CAPTION>

                           Three Months Ended September 30,                      Nine Months Ended September 30,
                           ----------------------------------------------------  --------------------------------------------------

                           1996                       1995                       1996                        1995
                           -------------------------  -------------------------  ------------------------  ------------------------
                           Primary    Fully Diluted   Primary     Fully Diluted  Primary    Fully Diluted  Primary    Fully Diluted
                           ---------  --------------  ---------   -------------  ---------  -------------  ---------  ------------
<S>                        <C>        <C>             <C>         <C>            <C>        <C>            <C>        <C>

Weighted average shares
  outstanding for the
  period                   2,069,505    2,069,505     1,404,969     1,404,969    2,000,652    2,000,652    1,403,115    1,403,115

Dilutive common stock
  options using the
  treasury stock method       65,424       60,651       102,718       102,718       65,601       60,651       95,426      102,718
                           ---------    ---------     ---------     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------

Total shares used for per
  share calculations       2,134,929    2,130,156     1,507,687     1,507,687    2,066,253     2,061,303   1,498,541    1,505,833
                           =========    =========     =========     =========    =========     =========   =========    =========

  Net income               $  47,000    $  47,000     $  63,000     $  63,000    $ 181,000     $ 181,000   $ 155,000    $ 155,000
                           =========    =========     =========     =========    =========     =========   =========    =========

  Earnings per share       $    0.02    $    0.02     $    0.04     $    0.04    $    0.09     $   0.09    $    0.10    $    0.10
                           =========    =========     =========     =========    =========     =========   =========    =========

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Stuart Grayston, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd.; 

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 2, 2007
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3281

To designate the United States Post Office located at 60 Third Avenue

in Long Branch, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Pat King Post Office Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 15 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. TORRICELLI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To designate the United States Post Office located at 60

Third Avenue in Long Branch, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Pat

King Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAT KING POST OFFICE

4 BUILDING.

5 The United States Post Office located at 60 Third

6 Avenue in Long Branch, New Jersey, shall be known and

7 designated as the ‘‘Pat King Post Office Building’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United
2

•S 3281 IS

1 States Post Office referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

2 to be a reference to the Pat King Post Office Building.

Æ
#### Standard Oil Company (Indiana), Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Defendants and Appellants: Tabbert, Defendant and Respondent.

*December 4, 1941*

January *13, 1942.*

*459For the appellant Industrial Commission there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer*Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Levitan.*

For the appellants Emil Krueger and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company there was a brief by *M. T. Lee*and *John L.*Schlatterer, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Schlatterer.*

For the respondent there was a brief by Thomas, *Orr & Isaksen,*attorneys, and *San W. Orr*and *Joseph G. Werner*of counsel, all of Madison, and oral argument by *Mr. Orr.*

Martin, J.

The judgment of the lower court vacated and set aside the findings and order of the Industrial Commission dated August 24, 1940. It further directed the commission to find that Krueger was the employer of Tabbert and *460to enter an award in his favor, and directed Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company to pay compensation. The trial court has correctly interpreted our former opinion in this case. Apparently the Industrial Commission concluded that because the case was remanded to it for a finding as to the Krueger-Tabbert relationship the court regarded that as a disputed fact. There is no basis for any such interpretation of our former opinion. The facts then and now are not in dispute. Whether certain facts create a legal relationship of employer and employee is a question of law. On the former appeal, page 502, the court said:

> “Reference to the Workmen’s Compensation Act (ch. 102, Stats.) shows that an *employer*is a person usually employing three or more persons, or who has entered into a contract of insurance for compensation or against liability therefor, and that an *employee*is a person in the service of another under a contract of hire, including helpers. *Under these tests Krue-ger, as held below, is Tabberf’s employer and hence liable for the compensation.”*

If this court had the power to make findings of fact when the facts are undisputed it would have done so on the former appeal, and would have found the facts in accordance with the opinion that Krueger was the employer of Tabbert and liable for compensation. Following the rule in *Frank Martin-Laskin Co. v. Industrial Comm.*180 Wis. 334, 193 N. W. 70, the cause was remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion. The court having held that Krueger was Tabbert’s employer and hence liable for the compensation, it was the duty of the commission to so find the fact. The last sentence of the former opinion reads:

> “When he [Krueger] is found to be the employer, the award must follow.”

It will serve no useful purpose to make reference to the points discussed in the briefs of counsel on this appeal.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25261]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service <SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 508 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-125, K2025-123.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-25261 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### STATE *vs.*NEWSOM & BRINDLE.

The State, on a trial for a misdemeanor, upon a question under the statute of limitations, is not restricted to the time stated in* the Indictriient, but is at liberty to go back two years previously to the finding of the bill.

This was an bstdiotment for fornication and adultery, tried before his Honor Judge Dice, at the Spring Term, 1855, oi\ Eorsyth Superior Court.

The defendants asked his Honor to charge the jury that unless they wore satisfied from the testimony in the case, that the defendants were guilty within the time stated in the bill of indictment, they were entitled to a verdict of not guilty.

His Honor refused *so*to .charge, but told the jury that they were at liberty to consider any acts that had been proved against the defendants within two years next before the finding of the bill. Defendants excepted to the charge.

Verdict against the defendants, and judgment. Defendants appealed.

*Attorney General,*for the State.

*Miller*and *Gilmer,*for the defendants.

Nash, O. J.

The court below could not charge the jury *174as required; they were not restricted in their inquiry to the time embraced in the indictment, bat were at liberty, as directed by his Honor, to take into consideration *any*acts of the defendants, charged in the bill and proved to have been committed within two years, next before the finding of the indictment or the legal presenting of the offence. At common law it is indispensable that the indictment should fix some certain day at which every material fact, constituting the crime, occurred. The authorities, however, fully show that it is sufficient to prove on the trial, that the offence was committed before the prosecution was commenced. The rule does not apply to cases where time enters into the offence. Time does not enter into the offence here charged, except that time which limits the commencement of the prosecution. Ilis Honor was perfectly correct in telling the jury that if they were satisfied, from evidence, that the defendants were guilty within two years before the finding of the bill of indictment, they should convict them. See *Pettijohn*v. Williams, *ante*33.

Pee CukiaM. Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925664
<NAME> ST. JAMES GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,820)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  41
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (41)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (41)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (41)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        


</TABLE>
UN I TED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

Mr. E d Ziemianski Carl s bad Field Office U .S. Department ofE nergy P.O. Box 3090 C arlsbad, New Mexico 88221 -3 090
Dear Mr. Ziemians ki: 

### NOV 2 3 2011 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

During the week of May 9 , 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency performed inspections of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) waste management and storage operation s, emplacement activities , and the monitoring program (Docket: A-98-49, II-B3-116). These ins pections were performed under the authorities of40 CFR 194.21 and 40 CFR Part 191 , S ubpart A.
As a result of the inspection, the Agency determined that the activities related to em ission s monitoring during waste management and storage continue to comply with th e requirements of 40 CFR Part 191 , Subpart A. We also determin ed that the U.S. Department of E nergy continue s to adequately monitor the ten parameters that are important to the long-term containment of waste, as identified in EPA's 1998 Certification Decision. The EPA also determined that waste is presently emplaced adequately.
Co pies of these in spection reports are enclosed with t hi s letter and will be placed in the EPA's pub li c dockets. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed report s, please contact Jonathan Wa lsh at (202) 343-9238.

l ntemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa

. gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperEnclo s ure

cc: Russ Patterson, DOE / CBFO George Basabilvaso, DOE/WlPP Alton Harris, DOEIHQ T im Hall , NMED Tom Kesterson, NMED Carlsbad EPA WIPP Team E PA Docket
---

**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Martin Tutschek, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Forum
National Investments Ltd.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

The company's other certifying officers and I am responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluations; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting:
and

The company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the
design or operation of internal control of financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.



|Date: April 2, 2009 | /s/
      Martin Tutschek                                  
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Martin Tutschek, Chief Financial Officer and
      Director

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SIGNAL
INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT CO.'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                              12
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,883
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        338,027
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                         904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,483
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,872
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    439
<INCOME-TAX>                                       149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                290
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       290
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.160
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.160


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE420]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) Law 
Enforcement Committee will hold a meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 12, 2024, from 2 
p.m. to 4 p.m. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for agenda details.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place via internet webinar. Details on 
how to connect to the webinar by computer and by telephone will be 
available at: www.mafmc.org/ (see website Calendar).
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
website: www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Law Enforcement Committee will review a 
potential butterfish mesh requirement change and make recommendations 
regarding enforceability issues. An agenda and background documents 
will be made available on the Council's website (www.mafmc.org) prior 
to the meeting.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: October 25, 2024.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-25205 Filed 10-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P