Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2024 / Notices 85557 

Stop #1621, Washington, DC 20240; 

telephone (202) 632–7003; fax (202) 

632–7066. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) 

established the National Indian Gaming 

Commission, which is charged with 

regulating gaming on Indian lands. 

Commission regulations (25 CFR part 

514) provide for a system of fee 

assessment and payment that is selfadministered by gaming operations. 

Pursuant to those regulations, the 

Commission is required to adopt and 

communicate assessment rates and the 

gaming operations are required to apply 

those rates to their revenues, compute 

the fees to be paid, report the revenues, 

and remit the fees to the Commission. 

All gaming operations within the 

jurisdiction of the Commission are 

required to self-administer the 

provisions of these regulations, and 

report and pay any fees that are due to 

the Commission. It is necessary for the 

Commission to maintain the fee rate to 

ensure that the agency has sufficient 

funding to fully meet its statutory and 

regulatory responsibilities. In addition, 

it is critical for the Commission to 

maintain constantly an adequate 

transition carryover balance to cover 

any cash flow variations. 

Pursuant to 25 CFR part 514, the 

Commission must also review annually 

the costs involved in processing 

fingerprint cards and set a fee based on 

fees charged by the Federal Bureau of 

Investigation and costs incurred by the 

Commission. Commission costs include 

Commission personnel, supplies, 

equipment & infrastructure costs, and 

postage to submit the results to the 

requesting tribe. The decrease in FY25 

fingerprint processing fee is attributable 

largely to the completion of the 

Agency’s hardware refresh of core 

networking and server computing 

devices in FY24 which has reduced the 

support time for on-premises systems 

and infrastructure supporting 

fingerprint processing. In addition, the 

successful establishment of the CJIS 

Audit Unit (CAU) within the Division of 

Technology has significantly decreased 

the cross-divisional resources 

previously required to ensure 

compliance with the Federal Bureau of 

Investigation Criminal Justice 

Information Services (FBI CJIS) 

requirements. FY25 fingerprint 

processing fee’s decrease also reflects 

the cost savings resulting from the 

completion of one-time capital 

investments associated with the 

Washington, DC headquarters office 

relocation in FY24. In FY25 the 

Commission will also continue its 

commitment to take necessary measures 

to comply with the FBI CJIS 

requirements which ensure the NIGC 

and participating tribes can continue to 

use FBI criminal history report 

information (CHRI) to assist in 

determining a key employee or primary 

management official’s eligibility for a 

gaming license. 

Dated: October 23, 2024. 

Sharon M. Avery, 

Acting Chair. 

Dated: October 23, 2024. 

Jean Hovland, 

Vice Chair. 

[FR Doc. 2024–24968 Filed 10–25–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7565–01–P 

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE 

UNITED STATES 

Committee on Rules of Practice and 

Procedure; Meeting of the Judicial 

Conference 

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the 

United States. 

ACTION: Committee on Rules of Practice 

and Procedure; Notice of open meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Committee on Rules of 

Practice and Procedure will hold a 

meeting in a hybrid format with remote 

attendance options on January 7, 2025 

in San Diego, CA. The meeting is open 

to the public for observation but not 

participation. An agenda and supporting 

materials will be posted at least 7 days 

in advance of the meeting at: https://

www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/ 

records-and-archives-rules-committees/ 

agenda-books. 

DATES: January 7, 2025. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. 

Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief Counsel, 

Rules Committee Staff, Administrative 

Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood 

Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, 

One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7–300, 

Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 

502–1820, RulesCommittee_Secretary@

ao.uscourts.gov. 

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.) 

Dated: October 23, 2024. 

Shelly L. Cox, 

Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff. 

[FR Doc. 2024–25005 Filed 10–25–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210–55–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1121–0NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed New Information 

Collection Activity; Comment Request, 

Proposed Study Entitled ‘‘The Study of 

Interpersonal Violence Among Young 

Adults Pilot Project’’ 

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, 

U.S. Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, 

National Institute of Justice, is 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: The Department of Justice 

encourages public comment and will 

accept input until December 27, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments, 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Erica Howell, Social Science Research 

Analyst, Office on Violence and 

Victimization Prevention, by email at 

erica.howell@usdoj.gov or telephone at 

(202) 616–8663. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the National Institute of 

Justice, including whether the 

information will have practical utility. 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used. 

—Evaluate whether and, if so, how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced. 

—Minimize the burden of collecting 

information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1