alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                      2719
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                811
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                50944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           65135
<PP&E>                                                     39681
<DEPRECIATION>                                             14594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             96594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      15044
<BONDS>                                                    25772
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                      91
<OTHER-SE>                                                 54507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               96594
<SALES>                                                    85750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           85750
<CGS>                                                      48865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              48865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           36299
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          1525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (731)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               (281)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (450)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (450)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85275-85276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24812]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Small Business Investment Company License Issuance

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) licenses.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under section 301(c) of the Small Business 
Investment Act of 1958, as amended, to grant Small Business Investment 
Company licenses under the Small Business Investment Company Program, 
this notice satisfies the requirement effective August 17, 2023 under 
13 CFR 107.501(a) to publish in the Federal Register the names of SBICs 
with date of licensure and Total Intended Leverage Commitments. The 
following SBICs received SBIC licenses as of the date indicated below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Date of     Leverage tiers
             SBIC Fund name                  licensure          \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fidus Mezzanine Capital IV, L.P.........       9/30/2024           2.00x
Tree Line SBIC, L.P.....................       9/30/2024           2.00x
Stifel North Atlantic AM-Forward, L.P...       9/27/2024           2.00x
Mosaic Capital Investors II SBIC, L.P...       9/27/2024           1.00x
Star Mountain SBIC Fund II, L.P.........       9/18/2024           2.00x
Lafayette Square SSBIC, L.P.............        9/9/2024           2.00x
Corbel Equity Partners SBIC, L.P........       8/26/2024           1.25x
TZP SBIC Partners I, L.P................       8/13/2024           1.00x

[[Page 85276]]

 
Eagle Fund VI-A, L.P....................        7/8/2024           2.00x
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Maximum amount of Leverage expressed as a multiple of Leverageable
  Capital pursuant to 13 CFR 107.1150. For all SBIC Licensees that
  submitted a Management Assessment Questionnaire after August 17, 2023,
  the Notice of SBIC Licenses will include the Total Intended Leverage
  Commitment at the time of Licensure.


Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. 
Small Business Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-24812 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO ESCOBAR, a.k.a. Roberto

Escobar Rosales,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71232

Agency No. A094-314-164

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 10, 2013** 

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Roberto Escobar, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding

of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

JUN 12 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-71232

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards

governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. 

Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for

review.

Escobar does not challenge the agency’s dispositive finding that his asylum

application is time-barred.

In his declaration Escobar claimed he feared the Salvadoran government

because of his father’s guerrilla activities, but during his hearing he testified he

feared the guerrillas because of his own actions. Substantial evidence supports the

agency’s adverse credibility determination based on this. See Zamanov v. Holder,

649 F.3d 969, 973-74 (9th Cir. 2011) (adverse credibility finding supported where

incidents petitioner omitted from asylum application materially altered claim);

Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1047 (“when an inconsistency is at the heart of the claim it

doubtless is of great weight”). In the absence of credible testimony, Escobar’s

withholding of removal claim fails. See id. at 1048 & n.6.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 85213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24904]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the 
FTC Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamika Williams, Acting Chief Human 
Capital Officer, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580, 
(202) 326-2184.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Publication of the Performance Review Board 
(PRB) membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews 
and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance 
by the supervisor, and makes recommendations regarding performance 
ratings, performance awards, and pay-for-performance pay adjustments to 
the Chair.
    The following individuals have been designated to serve on the 
Commission's Performance Review Board:

Monique Fortenberry, Director, Office of Workplace Inclusivity & 
Opportunity
Robin Moore, Principal Deputy General Counsel
Maribeth Petrizzi, Assistant Director for Compliance, Bureau of 
Competition
David Robbins, Executive Director, PRB Chair
Ted Rosenbaum, Deputy Director for Research and Management, Bureau of 
Economics
Rebecca Unruh, Deputy Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection
Tamika Williams, Acting Chief Human Capital Officer

    By direction of the Commission.
April J. Tabor,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-24904 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. William Kilmer, Appellant.

Appeal: record: appirmance.

*Appeal from Poweshiek District Court.*— Hon. A. R. Dewet, Judge.

Friday, December 18, 1891.

The defendant was accused and convicted of the crime of nuisance. He was adjudged to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and costs, and to be imprisoned in the county jail until the sum should he paid. From that judgment he *appeals.*

Affirmed.

No appearance for either party.

Robinson, J.

This cause was submitted to us without argument on a transcript which does not show any of the evidence on which the cause was tried. We have examined the record with care, but have found nothing of which the appellant can complain. The charge of the court, so far as we are able to determine in the absence of the evidence, was fair to the defendant. It does not appear that any exception was taken to the charge, nor to any part of it, nor to the judgment. Affirmed.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0310[1] From: Suchecki, Joe [JSuchecki@ngelaw.com] Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:36 AM To: Tanya Parise Subject: RE: Engine Question

Tanya,

I have confirmed with a couple of EMA members that are involved in the home generator market that the virtually all home generators are spark-ignited and fueled by natural gas. For stationary home generators, there are not likely to be many diesel or gasoline powered units. It was suggested that that there may be some diesel generators used for farm or home use in remote locations where there is no access to natural gas or propane, but they do not think there are significant numbers.

A gain, unless in very remote locations, these would also be back-up or emergency generators for home use.

We do not have any numbers regarding home generators. However, if you would like to get more information, you may contact Nick Halstead with Cummins Power Generation, and they may be able to provide some more general information on the home generator market.

Nick's email is nick.v.halstead@cummins.com

Joe

Joe Suchecki Director, Public Affairs Engine Manufacturers Association Two North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700 Chicago, IL 60602

Tel: 312-827-8734

Fax: 312-827-8737 j suchecki@emamail.org www.enginemanufacturers.org

Confidentiality Notice: This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete it and any attachments without copying or further transmitting the same.

A ll attachments are MS Office XP and are MIME encoded. If you have any software compatibility issues, please contact EMA at (312) 827-8700 immediately.

From: Tanya Parise [mailto:parise.tanya@ecrweb.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:15 PM To: Suchecki, Joe Subject: Engine Question Hi Joe,

Quick question about engines. I know you’re already working on something for Melanie on the crankcase issue, but I wanted to know if EMA has any information on the number of engines or the Page 1EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0310[1] percentage of stationary emergency engines that are residential engines. I’m not sure how this information would be tracked or if it’s even possible, but if you have a rough estimate of how many emergency diesel engines are in people’s homes, that would be very helpful.

Thanks, Tanya

Tanya Parise EC/R Incorporated 501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (919) 484-0417

Page 2
r ‘. OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF **TEXAS** AUSTIN
HonorableWlili~ J. Law*on ~e0rebu-y of sate Austin, Texas. Dear Slrr to ths oorr m&ted civil etat\a lruah tee is to be qoU. OS Vermn~e aanotatsd Artids 8756 eonta e 80m6 6onflfat Artlola 

### 5'164.ITo ot exist*beoauao Tltls 93 prorldesrEennanblo Uillkaa f. Uw8on, pa@ 2 We belfwe $2.20 te be the Siling the am&mnt inguirod about. 

## aorreat~ fw t**6P** Your6 very tru.LJ
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Giora Gutman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:




1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of R.V.B. Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 29, 2013




/s/Giora Gutman

Name: Giora Gutman

Title: Chief Executive Officer
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Disposition of Comments QPM# AIR-ANM-Q30-F2 Date: June 13,2008 Revi13ion 1 Page 1 of 1 

## Comments In Response to FAA Final Rule; Request for Comments -0430 

### Docket: FAA-2010-4939- Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-098-AD Comments have been received inresponse to: 

### "Final rule; request/or comments," Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. (Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine 

### ifadditional action is warranted. Onceyou have made your determination, please 

## fill in the commenler(s) name(s) and check the appropriate rejponse below. Include additional informarionfollowing the appropriate response, 

### ifnecessary. Then type inyour name and date inIhespaces provided, and return il TO: James C. Johnson, ANM-J/4.)
The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related tothe above FAA Docket that we received from: Delta Airlines, The Boeing Company and American Airlines. (Please check olle.) _X_ These comments have not been found tocontain any information towarrant reconsideration or revision ofthis AD.

___ These comments have been found tocontain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory action. 

### (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual FAA-IR-M-8040.IA, p"r"graph 2/.d., FORADDITIONAL ACTION.)

Dale: (This form ispart ofthe official docket file forthis AD action.) UNCONTROLLED COpy WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50163

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN JOSE MACIAS-CASTRO,

also known as Rogelio Martinez-Lopez,

also known as Martin Sotelo-Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-97-CR-106-ALL-JN

--------------------

October 29, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Jose Macias-Castro, federal prisoner # 79463-080,

appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

motion for reduction of his sentence for illegal reentry into the

United States after deportation. Macias-Castro asserts that he

is entitled to a sentence reduction under Amendment 632, as that

recent amendment to the sentencing guidelines retroactively
No. 02-50163

-2-

applies to reduce U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2's enhancement for deportation

following an aggravated felony conviction. 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), a sentencing court may

reduce a term of imprisonment “based on a sentencing range that

has been subsequently lowered by the Sentencing Commission

. . . , if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy

statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.” Section

3582(c)(2) applies only to amendments to the sentencing

guidelines that operate retroactively, as set forth in subsection

(c) of the applicable policy statement, U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, p.s. 

United States v. Drath, 89 F.3d 216, 217-18 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Amendment 632 is not listed in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c), p.s. 

Thus, an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction based on

Amendment 632 would not be consistent with the Sentencing

Commission’s policy statement. See Drath, 89 F.3d 218. 

Amendment 632 therefore cannot be given retroactive effect in the

context of an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. See id.

In light of the foregoing, the district court lacked the

authority to reduce Macias-Castro’s sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Lopez, 26 F.3d 512,

515 & n.3 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court’s order denying

Macias-Castro’s motion for reduction of sentence is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Sound Federal Bancorp

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-61887 and 333-93215) on Form S-8 of Sound Federal Bancorp of our report
dated April 27, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sound
Federal Bancorp and subsidiary as of March 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2001, which
report appears in the March 31, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sound Federal
Bancorp.


\s\ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
June 20, 2001
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                                    AGREEMENT



                  This Agreement is made this 18th day of October, 2001 by and
among Tender Loving Care Health Care Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Company"), Stephen Savitsky, David Savitsky and Dale R. Clift.

                  Reference is made to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization, dated October 18, 2001 (the "Merger Agreement"), by and among
Company, Parent and TLC Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation.
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the
respective meanings given such terms in the Merger Agreement.

                  In connection with the consummation of the transactions
contemplated under the Merger Agreement, Company agrees to make, on the date the
Minimum Condition is satisfied, payment of the following amounts, less
applicable withholding taxes, in immediately available funds, to the individuals
identified below:

<Table>
<Caption>
 Name of Payee                                           Amount
 -------------                                           ------
<S>                                                    <C>
Stephen Savitsky                                       $1,230,000
David Savitsky                                         $  449,000
Dale R. Clift                                          $1,250,000
</Table>

                  The undersigned parties acknowledge that, pursuant to a letter
dated the date hereof from e-MedSoft.com, a Nevada corporation ("Parent"), to
Stephen Savitsky, David Savitsky and Dale R. Clift, Parent has agreed to
contribute funds to Company upon the occurrence of the Minimum Condition in the
amount of the aggregate payments due to Stephen Savitsky, David Savitsky and
Dale R. Clift pursuant to this Agreement and otherwise guarantee the payment of
such amounts to such persons.



<PAGE>

                                      -2-


                  This Agreement may be executed in one or more original or
facsimile counterparts.

                                          TENDER LOVING CARE HEALTH CARE
                                          SERVICES INC.

                                          By: /s/ Stephen Savitsky
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Stephen Savitsky, Chairman of the
                                              Board and Chief Executive Officer

Acknowledged and accepted by:


     /s/ Stephen Savitsky
---------------------------------
       Stephen Savitsky


       /s/ David Savitsky
---------------------------------
       David Savitsky


        /s/ Dale R. Clift
---------------------------------
        Dale R. Clift
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Martin Myers, Appellant.

Appeal: record: evidence.

*Appeal from Polk District Court.*— Hon. Stephen P. Balliet, Judge.

Tuesday, October 27, 1891.

Dependant was convicted of the offense of owning and keeping intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same in violation of law. Prom a judgment requiring him to pay a fine and costs, and, in default of payment, committing him to the county jail, he *appeals.*

Affirmed.

Robinson, J.

This cause was submitted in this court on a transcript of the information, judgment of the district court, and notice of appeal, without argument for either party. We have examined the record, but find no cause for reversing the judgment of the district court. It is therefore affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of December 31, 1999, and statements of operations for the nine months
ended December 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,257
<SECURITIES>                                    64,050
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,524
<PP&E>                                         210,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                (42,995)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,252,902
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,985
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,098,296)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,418
<SALES>                                        188,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,623
<CGS>                                          206,807
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,990,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,210,281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,210,281)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,210,281)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52


</TABLE>