alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND AS
OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925662
<NAME> THE THORSDEN GROUP, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 42
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,654
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,858)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   42
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (28)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (28)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (28)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkona,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB  for the  quarterly  period  ended  December  31,  2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Alan
Rudd, Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Alan Rudd
----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer
February 21, 2006
EXHIBIT 7







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the annual report of Freegold Ventures Limited (the Company) on Form 20F for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gordon Steblin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13a-14(a) and  15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Company.







Gordon Steblin



Gordon Steblin

Chief Financial Officer







1

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 12, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 12, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0113. EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY v. DAVID ATKINS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2021CV044
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7438

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus ALTON R. HENRY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:00-cr-00150-RBS; 2:01-cv-00528-RBS) Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 8, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alton R. Henry, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Alton R. Henry seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Henry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Henry’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims- 3 - based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Henry’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 85226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Drug Testing Advisory 
Board; Notice of Availability of Report of Fiscal Year 2023 Closed or 
Partially Closed Meetings

AGENCY: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A report summarizing the closed or partially closed meeting 
activities of the SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Drug 
Testing Advisory Board during fiscal year 2023 has been prepared. A 
copy of this report has been filed with the Library of Congress.

DATES: Applicable Date: This notice is applicable October 21, 2024.

ADDRESSES: The report is available by contacting the DTAB designated 
federal official, Lisa Davis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Davis, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#713d1802105f35100718023102101c1902105f1919025f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1ad889280cfa580978892a192808c899280cf898992cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Phone: (240) 276-1440.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There is a Departmental requirement to 
complete and submit an Annual Report on Federal advisory committees 
when an entire or portion of the meeting is closed to the public as 
required by Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA).
    Copies of these reports for FY 2023 are being submitted to the 
Library of Congress, FACA Desk for public inspection and use.

    Dated: October 21, 2024.
Carlos Castillo,
Committee Management Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 2024-24834 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Davis, 138 Ohio St.3d 1218, 2014-Ohio-3.]

C INCINNATI B AR A SSOCIATION v. D AVIS . [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Davis, 138 Ohio St.3d 1218, 2014-Ohio-3.] (No. 2012-0687

— Submitted December 30, 2013

— Decided January 3, 2014.)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by res pondent, Michael William Davis, Attorney Registration No. 0016994, last known bus iness address in Fort Thomas, Kentucky. {¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of October 30, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with six months st ayed on the condition that respondent commit no further misconduct, finds that re spondent has subs tantially complied with that order and with the pr ovisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this cour t that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

________________________
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of clickNsettle.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three and six months ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Form 10-QSB"), I, Roy Israel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that;

            (1) The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

            (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Dated: February 10, 2004


/s/ Roy Israel
--------------------------------------------
Roy Israel - Chairman of the Board, CEO and President


                                       25
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 12, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-373

Lower Tribunal No. 16-30377

________________

Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company,

Appellant,

vs.

Guillermo B. Quintero, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jennifer D. 

Bailey, Judge.

Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Paulo R. Lima, for appellant.

Giasi Law, P.A. and Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger (Tampa), for 

appellees.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Vargas v. Safepoint Ins. Co., No. 3D19-1656, at *2 (Fla. 

3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) (examining the “Concealment or Fraud” provision of 

a homeowner’s insurance policy and concluding that “the term ‘false 

statement’ in the post-loss context includes an element of intent to mislead”); 

Anchor Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Trif, 322 So. 3d 663, 675 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) 

(concluding that, “in the post-loss context, the term ‘false statement’ in the 

‘Concealment or Fraud’ exclusion [of a homeowner’s insurance policy] 

should be interpreted as including an element of intent”).
EXIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sector 10, Inc. (fna SKRM Interactive, Inc).; on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Laurence A. Madison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











By:  /s/ Laurence A. Madison

Name: Laurence A. Madison

Chief Financial Officer



November 13, 2008
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IVAN RENE MOORE, 

Appellant, 

 v. 

U.S. TRUSTEE, for Region 16; WELLS 

FARGO BANK, N.A., 

Appellees.

No. 18-55165 

D.C. No. 2:16-cv-09540-AB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2019**

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Debtor Ivan Rene Moore appeals pro se from the district court’s order 

affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review for an abuse of 

discretion a bankruptcy court’s decision to dismiss a case for cause. Marsch v. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-55165 

Marsch (In re Marsch), 36 F.3d 825, 828 (9th Cir. 1994). We review for clear 

error a bankruptcy court’s findings of fact. Dominguez v. Miller (In re 

Dominguez), 51 F.3d 1502, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not clearly err in concluding that Moore failed to 

comply with certain reporting requirements in a timely manner and failed to 

complete accurately his schedules, and, on the record before it, the bankruptcy 

court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Moore’s bankruptcy case “for 

cause.” See 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b) (permitting a bankruptcy court to dismiss a case 

“for cause” “on request of a party in interest”), (b)(4)(F) (explaining that an 

“unexcused failure to satisfy timely any filing or reporting requirement established 

by this title . . .” provides cause to dismiss a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition);

Toibb v. Radloff, 501 U.S. 157, 165 (1991) (bankruptcy court has “substantial 

discretion to dismiss a Chapter 11 case in which the debtor files an untenable plan 

of reorganization”).

We reject as without merit Moore’s contention that his due process and 

equal protection rights were violated.

Moore’s requests for oral argument, set forth in his opening and reply briefs, 
3 18-55165 

are denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### Pilley, Appellant, vs. Motor Transport Company and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Taylor, Phillips & Taylor*of Kenosha.

For the respondents: *La France & Edwards,*of Racine.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
T. F., A Child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3059

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 18, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Kathy L. Garner, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, and Stephanie N. Osman, Assistant Public Defender, 

Quincy, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, 

and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., BENTON, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7523

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RONNIE EARL KNOX,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:03-cr-00220-FDW-4)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Earl Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Earl Knox appeals the district court’s orders 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his 

sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm. United States v. Knox, No. 3:03-cr-00220-FDW-4 

(W.D.N.C. July 16, 2012, Aug. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1
                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officer of eNetpc, Inc.
does hereby certify that:

     a) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of eNetpc, Inc. for the year ended
February 28, 2003 (the "Report:) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eNetpc, Inc.



Dated: June 13, 2003       /s/ Richard A. Pomije
                         -----------------------------------
                         Richard A. Pomije
                         Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SEEC, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2003 (the "Report"), the
undersigned , in the capacities and dates listed below, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



Date:  February 13, 2003                      /s/    RAVINDRA KOKA
                                      ------------------------------------
                                                 Ravindra Koka
                                President, Chief Executive Officer and Director