alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LORONIX
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS 
FROM ITS 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998<F1>
<CASH>                                       2,662,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,968,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                   108,533
<INVENTORY>                                  1,479,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,620,845
<PP&E>                                       5,585,345
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,916,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,222,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,685,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,646,186
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,531,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,222,340
<SALES>                                      1,903,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,903,869
<CGS>                                        1,003,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,591,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (36,219)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (667,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (668,595)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (668,595)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
<FN>
(F1> The company has two outstanding letters of credit collateralized by a 
combination of certificates of deposit and cash totaling approximately $100,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 610

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain

land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management in Washakie County and Big Horn County,

Wyoming, to the Westside Irrigation District, Wyoming,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 610 ES

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—On completion of an environ3 mental analysis under the National Environmental Policy

4 Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Secretary of

5 the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau

6 of Land Management (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Sec7 retary’’), shall convey to the Westside Irrigation District,

8 Wyoming (referred to in this Act as ‘‘Westside’’), all right,

9 title, and interest (excluding the mineral interest) of the

10 United States in and to such portions of the Federal land

11 in Big Horn County and Washakie County, Wyoming, de12 scribed in subsection (c), as the district enters into an

13 agreement with the Secretary to purchase.

14 (b) PRICE.—The price of the land conveyed under

15 subsection (a) shall be equal to the appraised value of the

16 land, as determined by the Secretary.

17 (c) LAND DESCRIPTION.—

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The land referred to in sub19 section (a) is the approximately 16,500 acres of land

20 in Big Horn County and Washakie County, Wyo21 ming, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Westside

22 Project’’ and dated May 9, 2000.

23 (2) ADJUSTMENT.—On agreement of the Sec24 retary and Westside, acreage may be added to or

25 subtracted from the land to be conveyed as nec26 essary to satisfy any mitigation requirements under
3

S 610 ES

1 the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42

2 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

3 (d) USE OF PROCEEDS.—Proceeds of the sale of land

4 under subsection (a) shall be deposited in a special ac5 count in the Treasury of the United States and shall be

6 available to the Secretary of the Interior, without further

7 Act of appropriation, for the acquisition of land and inter8 ests in land in the Worland District of the Bureau of Land

9 Management in the State of Wyoming that will benefit

10 public recreation, public access, fish and wildlife habitat,

11 or cultural resources.

Passed the Senate July 27, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 610

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey

certain land under the jurisdiction of the Bureauof Land Management in Washakie County andBig Horn County, Wyoming, to the Westside Irrigation District, Wyoming, and for other purposes.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the  Quarter  Ended  August 31, 2008 (the  "Report")  by
Progressive  Training,  Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned  hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.



October 15, 2008                    By:  /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         Buddy Young
                                         Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                         Financial Officer
<PAGE>

EX-32  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF JAMES H. ALEXANDER AND DANNIE SHAVER

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the annual report of Everlert, Inc. ("Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 23, 2004                     By: /s/ James H. Alexander
                                              ----------------------
                                              James H. Alexander, President



Dated: April 23, 2004                     By: /s/ Dannie Shaver
                                              -----------------
                                              Dannie Shaver, Secretary/Treasurer
APPELLATE NO. 05-14-01180-CV

IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

SHERRY RHODES

V.

JAMES ANDREW AIKENS AND NANCY AIKENS

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.A.

_______________________________________________________________________

REQUEST PERMISSION TO ENTER

FIRST CORRECTED AMENDED APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED JUNE 30, 2015

(duly filed July 8, 2015)

_______________________________________________________________________

Sherry Rhodes

2001 Logan's Pointe

Mount Vernon, Texas 75457

214 530 7501

ACCEPTED

05-14-01180-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

7/8/2015 9:22:59 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 7/8/2015 9:22:59 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
TO THE HONORABLE OF COURT OF APPEALS:

Comes Now, Sherry Rhodes, Appellant, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appeals 38 

and respectfully request the Court allow the filing of the First Corrected Amended 

Appellants Brief filed on June 30, 2015, which has been duly filed this 8th day of July 

2015. In support of her request, Appellant show unto the Court:

1. As instructed by this Court, Rhodes filed an Amended Appellant's brief on or 

before June 30, 2015, which was filed of record on June 30, 2015.

2. Appellant has discovered the following potential defects she would like to correct 

or amend:

a. Add the required “Appendix” to the document inadvertently left off, and it's

reference addition to the Table of Contents.

b. Add a copy of the original Affidavit attached to the Original brief filed 

March 20, 2015 which was inadvertently left off this amended brief. And to include it's 

reference on page 45 as Exhibit A-2.

3. No change of content issue, and no other changes are made other than to 

effectuate the change listed above.

4. This request is not filed in order to delay or hamper these proceedings.

5. Change is an inadvertent err and should not act as surprise to Appellees.

Wherefore, Appellant respectfully requests the Court grant permission to file the 

First Correction of the Amended Appellant's Brief filed June 30, 2015.
Submitted this the 8th day of July, 2015.

/s/ Sherry Rhodes_________

Sherry Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se

2001 Logan's Pointe

Mount Vernon, Texas 75457

srhodes009@gmail.com

Certificate of Conference

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.1, I certify that I am Appellate 

Pro Se and that I have conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with all other 

parties which are listed below about the merits of this Request with the following 

results: It is presumed that all are opposed, save Breena Nichols Rhodes who is 

unopposed.

/s/ Sherry Rhodes________________

Certificate of Services

I do hereby certify that on July 8, 2015, I have faxed or mailed a copy of this 

Request to all parties at the last known addresses or via efile, or to counsels by First 

Class Mail.

/s/ Sherry Rhodes_______________
(2/23/2010) Becky Schwantes - Steam Electric Power Generating EG - Proposed Page 1

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: HBartholomot@eei.org; RBozek@eei.org; tpugh@appanet.org; 

jpblackford@appanet.org; DBHILL@southernco.com

CC: Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov

Date: 1/14/2010 4:27 PM

Subject: Steam Electric Power Generating EG - Proposed ICR Follow up Materials

Attachments: ICR glossary_Jan 14 2010.doc; Plant Mailing Addresses_Jan 14 2010.xls; pic27541.jpg

Greetings,

This e-mail is a follow up to requests provided by UWAG, APPA, EEI

and/or its members during previous outreach calls regarding the proposed

ICR for the steam electric power generating effluent guidelines

rulemaking. As you are aware, the comment period for the First Federal

Register notice ended on December 28, 2009 and EPA is currently in the

process of reviewing and addressing these comments.

1. Draft Glossary

We have prepared a draft glossary that will be included as part of the

questionnaire (see attached file). The glossary will be included along

with the ICR that will be submitted to the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) for approval, and will be available for public comment when

EPA publishes a Federal Register notice announcing submission of the ICR

to OMB. However, we would like to offer you the opportunity for an

early review of the draft glossary and invite you to provide feedback.

In order for us to accommodate changes prior to submitting the ICR to

OMB, we ask you to send us your suggestions for changes to the

definitions, as well as identifying any terms that should be added or

deleted, by Friday, January 22.

(See attached file: ICR glossary_Jan 14 2010.doc)

2. Plant Mailing Addresses

We've heard concern expressed about the address EPA intends to use for

distributing the questionnaires to the industry. Attached is a file

listing all power plants included in EPA's database of potential

respondents. (Note that EPA does not intend to send the questionnaire to

every plant on the list; however, EPA does not know at this time which

plants will be selected, nor will that be known until after the random

selection process occurs.). The plants were identified using Energy

Information Administration (EIA) data, which in most cases is also the

source of data for the mailing addresses. We invite you to review the

addresses and operator names, and to provide feedback on any corrections

that may be needed, including identifying any plants that may have been

incorrectly omitted from the list. We ask that you send us your

suggested changes to us by February 1.

(See attached file: Plant Mailing Addresses_Jan 14 2010.xls)

Thanks for your time,

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic27541.jpg)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 490 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 490

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
   conducting of certain games of chance shall not be treated as an 
                      unrelated trade or business.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 1999

   Mr. Grams introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
   conducting of certain games of chance shall not be treated as an 
                      unrelated trade or business.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONDUCT OF CERTAIN GAMES OF CHANCE NOT TREATED AS UNRELATED 
              TRADE OR BUSINESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 513(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain bingo games) is amended by 
inserting before the period ``or qualified games of chance''.
    (b) Qualified Games of Chance.--Subsection (f) of section 513 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to unrelated trade or 
business) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Qualified games of chance.--For purposes of paragraph 
        (1), the term `qualified game of chance' means any game of 
        chance (other than bingo) conducted by an organization if--
                    ``(A) such organization is licensed pursuant to 
                State law to conduct such game,
                    ``(B) only organizations which are organized as 
                nonprofit corporations or are exempt from tax under 
                section 501(a) may be so licensed to conduct such game 
                within the State, and
                    ``(C) the conduct of such game does not violate 
                State or local law.''
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--The subsection heading of section 513(f) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``Bingo 
Games'' and inserting ``Games of Chance''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to games conducted after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

November 14, 2008

Mr. Darrin M. Walker

Law Office of Darrin Walker

2054 Parkdale Drive 

Kingwood, TX 77339

Mr. Gregory Norman Ziegler

MacDonald Devin, P.C.

1201 Elm St., Suite 3800

Dallas, TX 75270-2014

RE:Case Number:  08-0125

Court of Appeals Number:  12-06-00349-CV

Trial Court Number:  C22,031-2005

Style:IN RE  SHONDRA BUSTER, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES BREWER

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 08-0125Page 1**
/S>

/&E-' •Mitsui <&>Ss9 J?x>. iS. 7aJ£ SJZ&7Z: £>J^- 7&JC0-5 _

FILED IN , teaAT-asr At*/*** ASus^a. sa-s^aaetfz. -e^COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

RAR 27 iuld

'To &J<h>£^1 JT~ >x7y?</ dJ><u>'-0*EA>S' •' Abel Acosta, Clerk

GV&UJsdMT-s*?J?s/ £j#£<L£y/>7- ^ 53AV Z97& aaaz. a</?Z 9&S'3) ttsav- 7?S^

i

RECEIVED

MAR 19 2015

COURT OF APPEALS

WACO, TEXAS

RECEIVED IN

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS

Ab@S Acosta,Cf©rk

Ti^^j) An/DC . 7SXJ& OC3<,7
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 203 (Monday, October 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20732 and #20733; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-
20014]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Florida

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Florida 
(FEMA-4828-DR), dated 10/05/2024.
    Incident: Hurricane Helene.
    Incident Period: 09/23/2024 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 10/07/2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/04/2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/07/2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Florida, dated 10/05/2024, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Alachua, Bradford, Duval, Union.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-24184 Filed 10-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
#### R. J. M. BARBER v. R. M. ROSEBORO.

*Judge’s Charge*— Exception *to.*

*1.*Where the assignment of error to the J udge’s charge to the jury, was- “ that the appellant excepted to the whole charge and especially to the instruction on the third issue;” *It ivas held,*that such assignment of error was improper.

2. Where there is no evidence to prove the affirmative of an issue, it is-not error for the Judge to so charge the jury.

*193Civil ACTION, tried before *MacBae, Judge,*at February Term, 1886, of RowaN Superior Court.

There was a judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

No counsel for the plaintiff.

*Mr. Theo. F. Klutz,*for the defendant.

MbrriMON, J.

The case settled upon appeal states, that “ the plaintiff exceptéd generally to the whole charge, and especially to the instruction given upon the third issue.”

Error cannot thus be assigned as to the whole' charge— it must be specified with reasonable certainty, and designate the particular part or parts of the charge to which there is objection.

We think the instruction given the jury as to the third issue was correct. The inquiry was: “ Did the defendant wrongfully discharge the plaintiff?” So far as appears, all the evidence bearing upon it tended to prove that the defendant did not discharge the plaintiff; but another person — a sub-contractor — did, the defendant objecting. The Court might, therefore, properly tell the jury, that “ on this testimony, you will be obliged to hold that defendant did not wrongfully discharge him.” If there was no evidence tending to prove the affirmative of the issue, the Court might so instruct the jury, and tell them that they ought to render a verdict in the negative.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

No error. Affirmed.
#### Thomas T. Page, administrator, *et al.,*plaintiffs in error, *vs.*Elizabeth Page, defendant in error.

Where the widow had a homestead set apart to her and her minor children, out of the lands of her deceased husband, under the Act of 1868, and the same was levied on to satisfy an execution based on a claim contracted prior to the adoption of the Constitution of 1868, she is not barred from claiming her dower in said lands.

Homestead. Dower. Before Judge Herrchel V. Johnson. Johnson Superior Court. September Term, 1873.

For the facts of this case, see the decision.

John M. Stubbs, by Peeples & Howell, for plaintiffs in error.

No appearance for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

This was an application to the Superior Court to appoint commissioners for the assignment of dower. Page, the intestate, died 28th January, 1868. In July, 1869, the Ordinary set apart a homestead to his widow and minor children out of *598the lands of her deceased husband. The homestead was levied on to satisfy an execution issued on a judgment founded on a debt contracted prior to the Constitution of 1868. Objections were filed to the application on the ground that the widow of the intestate could not have a homestead and dower out of the land of the deceased intestate. The Court overruled the objections, and its judgment was excepted to.

There was no error in overruling the objections to the widow’s application for dower, on the statement of facts contained in the record. She obtained no homestead out of the lands of the intestate, as against debts contracted prior to the Constitution of 1868, and her attempt to obtain one did not bar her of her right to dower.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.