alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

EXHIBIT 12.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Daniel Clozza, Chief Executive Officer of Forum National Investments Ltd.,certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Forum National InvestmentsLtd.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

The company's other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this annual report based on such evaluations; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany's internal control over financial reporting: and 

The company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):

All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operationof internal control of financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affectthe registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls overfinancial reporting.

| Date: August 28, 2007 |   | /s/ Daniel Clozza                                    |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Daniel Clozza, Chief  Executive Officer and Director |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7184

TITO LEMONT KNOX,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY KRUEGER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (0:23-cv-02811-TMC)

Submitted: March 28, 2024 Decided: April 2, 2023

Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tito Lemont Knox, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7184 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Tito Lemont Knox appeals the district court’s November 8, 2023, text order denying 

Knox’s appeal of the magistrate judge’s order directing that Knox’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

petition be re-docketed as a motion for discharge under 18 U.S.C. § 4247(h) and 

administratively closing the underlying case. On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Knox’s informal brief 

does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate 

review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is 

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the appealed-from text 

order. We deny Knox’s motion for copies of the grand jury minutes, as supplemented, and 

deny as moot Knox’s motion to expedite resolution of this appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7184 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume, certify that

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of  clickNsettle.com,
Inc. (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,   the  financial  statements  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  Registrant's  other   certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  Registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  Registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred during the Registrant's  first fiscal quarter
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
Registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  Registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably  likely to
            adversely  affect  the  Registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
            summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  November 10, 2005

/s/ Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume
-----------------------------------------------
Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer


                                       21
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 3240-040]
 On November 30, 2022, the Briar Hydro Associates filed a new license application for the 4.3-megawatt Rolfe Canal Hydroelectric Project No. 3240 (project). The project is located on the Contoocook River in City of Concord, Merrimack County, New Hampshire. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on June 20, 2024, 
                    ( print page 85190)
                    Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the record, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to license the project.[1] The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and considered in the Commission's final licensing decision. The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members, and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or 
                    *OPP@ferc.gov.* The application will be processed according to the following schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate. Milestone
Target dateCommission issues EA
March 4, 2025.
 Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Jeanne Edwards at (202) 502-6181 or 
                    *jeanne.edwards@ferc.gov.* Dated: October 18, 2024. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         In accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations, the unique identification number for documents relating to this environmental review is 3240. 40 CFR 1501.5(c)(4) (2024). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2024-24805 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,935,234<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,046,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (120,606)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,679,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,638,295
<PP&E>                                       4,889,461
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,152,890)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,297,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,116,249
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,662
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,176,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,297,765
<SALES>                                      1,673,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,673,900
<CGS>                                          808,068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,465,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,657,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (741,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   210,962
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (530,474)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (530,474)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
<FN>
<F1>The company has two outstanding letters of credit collateralized by a
combination of certificates of deposit and cash totaling approximately
$100,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Dunham, Respondent, vs. Wendorf and others, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Alfred L. Godfrey*of Elkhorn.

For the respondent: *Moran & O'Brien*of Delavan.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.
#### Will of Gerlach: Bavetta, Respondent, vs. Spohn and others, Appellants.

*September 10, 1941*

January *13, 1942.*

For the appellants there, were briefs by /. *Henry Bennett*of Viroqua, attorney, and *Daniel H. Grady*of Portage of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Grady.*

*354For the respondent the cause was submitted on the briefs of *Wayne B. Schlints*of Viroqua, guardian *ad litem,*and *William M. Gliess*of Sparta, attorney.

The following opinion was filed November 4, 1941:

Faiechild, J.

The members of the court are equally divided upon this appeal, Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fritz, and Mr. Justice Wickhem being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Fowler, Mr. Justice Martin, and the writer are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.

Under the rule the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, without costs, on January 13, 1942.
CORRECTED COPY

The FAA is reissuing the letter dated July 2 nd . A correction was made to add the “What You

Should Do” section. Below is the letter that includes the change. We made the correction in

our records as of July 6, 2015.

July 2 , 2015

Mr . Paul Glinski

5840 W. Lawrence Ave. #301

Chicago, IL 60630

Dear Mr. Glinski :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explain s why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your March 31 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0859 ),

but we are unable to process your request any fur ther. The information you sent does no t

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, th e extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to proce ss your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

I f We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst

, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Williams, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Will C. Gobel*of Milwaukee.

■For the respondent Industrial Commission: *John E.*Mar- *' tiiij*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondents town of Wauwatosa and Bankers Indemnity Insurance Company: *Harry V. Meissner*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             476
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         702,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 763,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        340,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           177
<OTHER-SE>                                     309,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   763,130
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,616
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,673
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 (File No.
333-64066) of our report dated February 22, 2005, with respect to Notes B and
C[9] November 20, 2005, on our audit of the financial statements of the Company
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the years then ended, included
in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, Amendment No. 2 for the year ended December
31, 2004.



/s/ Eisner LLP
-------------------------
Eisner LLP



New York, New York
November 20, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,146,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,230,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        552,675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    150,000
<COMMON>                                           195
<OTHER-SE>                                     365,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,230,999
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,019
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,267
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,267
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>