alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

SRO”~R SELLERS 

A17DR~~~ GENERAL 

And rOhtOa natters. 

n, whioh is as follows: 

Amed Por co 

Uill man that a mmber of the &rmI T.‘orcos, discharged before 

ooasntim of hostilities, is still entitled to pay his delinquent tax,es, free of penalties and interest, any tim before 

ths expiration of six (6) months from the cessation of 

hostilities? .:. / 

. 
nOn, A. ,C. Winburn, page 2. 

I 

a “Ir EUOh iS not .tho C&W3, in .What p0riOd Of time 

rust, u isoliureod nmbor of the Arncd Porocs pay No taxes, after 

stioh disoharee, in order to reosive tho benefits of thia BillsV1 

.As your very oareful search has no,doubt revealed, 

there am no adjudiccted oases in the books beariN upon the 

qucetion asked by you. Sen3to Bill130 to this data has not been 

Oo55trued by the oourts. ; :, 

It is our opinion, rather&d. from the context or bhe 

lot, itself, that Senate Bill 1301 Soas meah, anong other thiws, 

that, a nelnber of the .?meA ]ForcOB, nanea in tho Bill, who is 

discharged bofore oessntion of hostilities, is entitled to poy 

hia dolinquoot taxes 3ocruing subcoquent to his ontry into such 

aorvice, .frec of penalties and intorost , at any tiue bcforo tho 

Oxplration of six mnths from the cessation 0,” hostilities, 

By tho expression *delinquent taxe5", ae used in hhe 

proceding paragraph, we have reforenoe to tho5e delinquent taxes 

3;ntloned in 3emte Xl1 130; to wit, l’...e,. on Stats and County 

sd vaJ.orem taxeo on property listed on the tax rolls of any couuty 

In the mm of any nuch aeabero of tha Armd Forces or their auxllinries, or of tho Amob Porocs Soserve of t!ieir auxiliaries, 

prior to the tine they joined buch Arnod i;'orcoo or suoh auxiliaries; 

I.,..... ..,,. 

11 

or OOWSG, aftor a nerJber of the Armecl Forcen, eta., 

lo disohsrgefi, he or ahe is, upon and subaequant to said dioohairge, 

no loa~or a nenber of the scid hrcied l;'orces or auxiliaries, and 

oay tunes which my aocruo upon hi5 or hor property, and beoorm 

Winpucnt, so aoome and so becom delinquent agai.mt the 

P;oPcrty of 3 private citizen, who is, not ombmco& within the term 

of 5nid Semte Bill 130, 

Ze enclose oopies of the httorhey Cmeral’s opinions 

!iu.;bers O-4463, O-5566, O-5651 and O-6067, whioh MS hope will be 

Of som help to you in the oolution of your prablens. 

tiuotinz that this amwors your qwstion, we are,
#### Estate of Mook: Peterson and wife, Respondents, vs. Hounsell and others, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Graves & Earll*of Prairie du Chien.

For the respondents: *C. B. Peterson*of Prairie du Chien.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-74278,No. 333-92324, No. 333-108348, No. 333-112326, No. 333-122656 and No. 333-132333) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-108346 and No. 333-141886) of Magma Design Automation, Inc. of our report datedJune 14, 2005 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

June 1, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the nine month period ended September 30, 1998, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         354,158
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  386,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    182,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               974,585
<PP&E>                                       1,305,062
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,160,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          559,452
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,860
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,584,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,160,026
<SALES>                                      1,052,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,314,509
<CGS>                                          608,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,898,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,046
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,172,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,172,542)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,172,542)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
#### State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Frank Supplee, Appellant.

Nuisance : judgment: affirmance.

*Appeal from Jones District Court.*— Hon. J. H. Preston, Judge.

Wednesday, February 10, 1892.

Indictment for nuisance, plea of guilty, and judgment that the defendant pay a fine of three hundred dollars and costs, including twenty-five dollars county attorney’s fee, and stand committed until paid. The defendant appeals.

*733
      *Fouke Lyon*and *J. W. Jamison,*for appellant.

*John 7. Stone,*Attorney. General, for appellee.

Given, J.

This case is submitted without briefs or argument, and upon the transcript alone. The transcript shows that the defendant plead guilty to the indictment charging him with the crime of nuisance, and that judgment was entered against him that he pay a fine of three hundred dollars and costs, including a fee of twenty-five dollars to the county attorney, and that he stand committed to the jail of the county, as provided by law. Our attention is not directed to any errors in the proceeding, and an examination of the transcript shows the proceeding to be regular and legal in all respects. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
Order entered August 16 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00106
- CR SUZANNE BATTLES, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. MB10
- 50867
- F



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court sha ll conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective rep resentation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### JOSEPH J. WILLIAMS AND WIFE *vs.*JOSHUA GRIFFIN *et al.*

The fact of the registration of a deed, without its having been proven, will not entitle it to be read in evidence.

AotioN of trespass q. c. f., tried before his Honor, Judge Manly, at the Fall Term, 1856, of Beaufort Superior Court.

On the trial, a deed to Thomas Collins and Christian Reed, from Samuel and Thomas Gardner, was offered in evidence in behalf of the plaintiffs. It did not 'appear that this deed had ever been proved; there was an endorsement upon it of registration, but no endorsement or other evidence of its hav*32ing ever been proved. It was objected to as evidence for tbe want of probate, and excluded by bis Honor. Eor wbicb tbe plaintiffs excepted.

Plaintiff took a nonsuit, and appealed.

No counsel appeared for tbe plaintiff in this Court.

JRoclmcm, for defendant.

Nash, C. J.

The question presented in this case is scarcely an open one. Tbe general provision made by tbe Act requiring deeds for lands to be registered, is that “ no conveyance of land shall be valid unless it be acknowledged by tbe grantor, or proven upon oath before one of tbe Judges of tbe Supreme Court, or of tbe Superior Court, or in tbe County Court of tbe County where tbe land lieth, and registered by tbe public register of tbe County.” Until a deed is proved, as by tbe Act directed, tbe public register has no authority to put it on bis book; the probate is bis warrant, and his only warrant for so doing. *Burnett*v. *Thompson,*3 Jones’ Rep. 113 ; *Tooley*v. *Lucas,*Ibid. 146 ; *Lambert*v. *Lambert,*11 Ire. Rep. 162.

In this case tbe original deed was produced, upon wbicb is a certificate of registration. Tbe case states, however, that there was no evidence that it ever bad been proved. If, upon this certificate of tbe register, tbe deed is to be received in evidence, tbe Act requiring probate is a dead letter, and tbe unauthorised act of tbe register gives efficacy to tbe- deed as evidence. The case of *Freeman*v. *Hatley, 8*Jones’ Rep. 115, affirms this view of'tbe question. Tbe evidence there was admitted upon tbe peculiar circumstances of tbe case; tbe original deed was lost, and tbe records of the- County Court of Montgomery, tbe County in wbicb tbe land lay, were destroyed by fire. There is no error.'

Pee Oueiam. Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LUDLUM
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  532,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               679,289
<PP&E>                                       3,915,569
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,717,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,915,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,887,653
<BONDS>                                        879,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,110
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,915,188
<SALES>                                      3,942,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,964,632
<CGS>                                        3,339,152
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,854,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                37,726
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             293,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (245,120)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (245,120)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (245,120)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.07)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.1

LOGO
                          BENTLEY COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

                           1904 11th Street, Suite #1
                         Santa Monica, California 90404
                      VOX: 310-445-2599 * FAX: 310-445-2529


                              LETTER OF UNDERTAKING
                              ---------------------
              RE: PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF WWW.SUNRISECITYCASINO.COM



October 10, 2001

Ignatius Michael Ferreira
Gaming Online Ltd.
532 Jorrisen Street
Sunnyside, Pretoria, 0002
Republic of South Africa

Dear Mr. Ferreira:

Bentley Communications Corp. (BTLY) herby undertakes to make an offer for 100%
of the website: www.sunrisecitycasino.com, and all of its operational functions,
from Gaming Online Ltd.

The proposed transaction would be settled by the issue to Gaming Online Limited
of 4,000,000 new shares in BTLY at a deemed value of $0.10/share. At present
there are approximately 36 million shares in issue in BTLY, trading at $.14 per
share.

The BTLY shares issued to Gaming Online Limited in terms of the proposed
transaction would be issued subject to Regulation S or Rule 144, as is required
by the regulatory authorities.

The proposed transaction is subject to a due diligence of
www.sunrisecitycasino.com confirming that the site is free of liens and
encumbrances and is fully transferable to Bentley Communications Corp. before
the shares can be released.

Full information regarding BTLY can be accessed via the Internet on the
following address: URL's freeedgar.com and bentleyintl.com. Please sign your
acceptance of this letter of undertaking, following which the process of
conveying the website to Bentley, via escrow with Thomas Braun, Esq., can begin
immediately.

Sincerely yours,


/s/ Gordon F. Lee
Gordon F. Lee, Chief Executive Officer



Accepted on behalf of the Board of Directors of Gaming Online Limited:


/s/ Ignatius Michael Ferreira
Ignatius Michael Ferreira, CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,040,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,915,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (467,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,724,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,094,000
<PP&E>                                      58,136,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,094,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,416,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       61,096,000
<BONDS>                                     28,829,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,484,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,416,000
<SALES>                                     83,341,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            83,341,000
<CGS>                                     (72,861,000)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (72,861,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,431,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (2,064,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,176,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,539,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,637,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (9,637,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,757,839
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,335,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (506,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,378,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,675,588
<PP&E>                                       2,656,753
<DEPRECIATION>                               (728,248)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,037,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,693,814
<BONDS>                                      2,693,710
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              380
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,953
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,907,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,037,146
<SALES>                                     22,133,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,133,691
<CGS>                                     (14,448,750)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (6,205,835)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (281,679)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (43,967)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,153,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                   245,736
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,416,045
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,416,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wasatch Food Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ben Peay, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| August 12, 2009 | /s/ Ben Peay |
|-----------------|--------------|

|   | Ben Peay |
|--------|----------|

|   | President and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION  I,  Chong Kim as Secretary and Treasurer (CFO),  certify  that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Marvins Place, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by       others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control financial reporting;  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 20, 2008 By:/s/ Chong Kim Chong Kim, Secretary and Treasurer (CFO)