alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ads In Motion, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Edward F. Myers III,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: 10/1/08                              By: /s/ Edward F. Myers III
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Edward F. Myers III
                                              Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


Goran Capital, Inc. -
Consolidated

Exhibit 11.01
Analysis of Earnings (Loss) Per Share
US GAAP - Treasury Method

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Three Months                          Three Months
                                                                     Ended                                 Ended
                                                                March 31, 2000                        March 31, 1999

<S>                                                                   <C>                <C>               <C>
Average Price (US $)                                                  N/A                (A)               $9.64

Proceeds from Exercise of Warrants and Options (US $)                 Nil                (B)             $204,816

Shares Repurchased - Treasury Method                                  Nil             (B) / (A)           21,251

Shares Outstanding - Weighted Average                              5,876,398                             5,876,398

Add:  Options and Warrants Outstanding (1)                            Nil                                 43,946

Less:  Treasury Method - Shares Repurchased                           Nil                                (21,251)

Shares Outstanding for US GAAP Purposes                            5,876,398            (C )             5,899,093

Net Earnings in Accordance with US GAAP                          $(3,412,000)            (D)             $123,000

Earnings (loss) Per Share - US GAAP - Basic                         $(0.58)                                $0.02

Earnings (loss) Per Share - US GAAP - Fully Diluted                 $(0.58)          (D) / (C )            $0.02

Note 1: Only those options with a dilutive  effect were  included  above for the
three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999.

</TABLE>
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed October 26, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-00923-CR

DEVON D. ALLEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-00628-U

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Evans, and Brown

Opinion by Justice Evans

A jury convicted Devon D. Allen for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a firearm, 

and assessed punishment at eighteen years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a 

brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional 

evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See 

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether 

brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We 

advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See 

Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file 

pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel).
–2–

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the 

appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support 

the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/David Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

170923F.U05
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DEVON D. ALLEN, Appellant

No. 05-17-00923-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-00628-U.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. 

Justices Myers and Brown participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered this 26th day of October, 2018.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

         The undersigned, the trustees of SunTrust Capital IV, desiring to form
a business trust pursuant to Delaware Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C. ss. 3810 et
seq. hereby certify as follows:

         (a) The name of the business trust being formed hereby (the "Trust") is
"SunTrust Capital IV."

         (b) The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which has
its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is as follows:

                           First Chicago Delaware Inc.
                           300 King Street
                           Wilmington, DE 19801

         (c) This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date of
filing

Dated: February 10, 1998               /s/ Raymond D. Fortin
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Raymond D. Fortin
                                     Regular Trustee

                                       /s/ Donald T. Heroman
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Donald T. Heroman
                                     Regular Trustee

                                       /s/ Kenneth R. Houghton
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Kenneth R. Houghton
                                     Regular Trustee

                                     FIRST CHICAGO DELAWARE INC., as
                                     Delaware Trustee

                                     By:   /s/ John R. Prendiville
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     John R. Prendiville
                                     Vice President

                                     THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO,
                                     as Institutional Trustee

                                     By:   /s/ John R. Prendiville
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     John R. Prendiville
                                     Vice President
September 16, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Meeting with Southern Company 

Attendees: 

Robert J. Wayland, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Bill Maxwell, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Nick Hutson, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Christian Fellner, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Brian Toth, Southern Company 

Kim Adelberg, Southern Company 

Brandon Looney, Southern Company 

Sarah Markham, Southern Company 

Discussion: 

A general discussion was held of the comments submitted by Southern Company on the 

proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards.
EXHIBIT 99.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Gregory C. Walker, the chief financial officer of Magma Design Automation,
Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gregory C. WalkerGregory C. WalkerJune 20,
2003




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Magma Design Automation, Inc. and will be retained by Magma Design Automation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

43) ll-K-(B)-31 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:49 AM Sheet 43 of 325 
P.2 

A~83~27 

H-K-(B)-31 

INCORPORATION OF LOW - BTU GASIFICATION (LBG) INTO THE 

IFCAM MODEL. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to A. Wehe, EPArSASD. 

January 3, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-31
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24686]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4830-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Georgia; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4830-DR), dated September 30, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 4, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of September 30, 2024.

    Bryan, Butts, Camden, Charlton, Glynn, Long, Newton, and Wayne 
Counties for Individual Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24686 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85273-85274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24916]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20469 and #20470; CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS 
OF THE YAKAMA NATION Disaster Number WA-20009]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama 
Nation (FEMA-4823-DR), dated September 24, 2024.
    Incident: Wildfires.

[[Page 85274]]


DATES: Issued on October 21, 2024.
    Incident Period: June 22, 2024, through July 8, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: December 16, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 24, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, 
dated September 24, 2024, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster 
to December 16, 2024.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-24916 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-10971

JOSEPH OYE OGUNTODU,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CV-114

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joseph Oye Oguntodu, Texas prisoner # 1728590, moves this court for a 

certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of relief, 

which he requested in a submission styled as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The 

district court construed the petition as raising only § 2254 claims arising out 

of Oguntodu’s prison disciplinary conviction in case number 20130024805 and 

denied it on the basis that Oguntodu did not have a liberty interest at stake. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 14, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-10971 Document: 00512561851 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2014
No. 13-10971

Oguntodu has not shown error in the district court’s decision that his 

disciplinary punishment did not implicate a protected liberty interest. Instead, 

given the benefit of liberal construction, he argues that the district court failed 

to consider his claim that prison officials filed the disciplinary complaint in 

retaliation for his complaints against another officer. We construe Oguntodu’s

request for a COA as both a request for a COA to appeal the denial of his § 2254 

claims and an appeal of the dismissal of his civil rights claims.

The label attached to a prisoner’s pro se pleading is not controlling; 

rather, courts must look to the content of the pleading. United States v. 

Santora, 711 F.2d 41, 42 n.1 (5th Cir. 1983). Oguntodu’s retaliation claim is 

potentially cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court, however, did 

not address whether Oguntodu stated cognizable claims under § 1983. See 

Serio v. Member of La. State. Bd. of Pardons, 821 F.2d 1112, 1119 (5th Cir. 

1987).

Oguntodu’s request for a COA to appeal the dismissal of his § 2254 

claims and his motion for the appointment of counsel are DENIED. The 

district court’s dismissal of Oguntodu’s civil rights claims is VACATED, and 

the case is REMANDED for the district court to consider whether Oguntodu

has alleged any civil rights claims cognizable under § 1983.

2

 Case: 13-10971 Document: 00512561851 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2014
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Murray Nicol, Vice President and chief financial officer of the Company, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd.; 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3. [omitted pursuant to Division of Corporation Finance: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002—FrequentlyAsked Questions November 8, 2002 (revised November 14, 2002)]; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 28, 2006
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I,
Gregory D. Frost, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Able Energy Inc.;





2. Based on my
knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this Report;





3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this Report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Report is being prepared;




b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in
this Report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.







November 13,
      2008
            /s/
      Gregory D. Frost
              Gregory
      D. Frost
              Chairman
      & Chief Executive
Officer