alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)

      I, Joseph Looney, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant , including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant 's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant 's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant 's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
effect, the registrant 's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant 's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date:  March 31, 2006               /s/ Joseph Looney
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Name:  Joseph Looney
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          86,252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  972,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,310,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,819,031
<PP&E>                                         766,790
<DEPRECIATION>                                 347,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,803,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,385,027
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,755
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,413,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,803,216
<SALES>                                      1,641,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,641,364
<CGS>                                          995,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  995,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,448,444
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             644,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,447,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,447,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,447,150)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,827,524
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,321,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (84,851)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,454,111
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,772,246
<PP&E>                                       5,110,297
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,329,215)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,534,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          750,911
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,663
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,744,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,534,317
<SALES>                                      4,127,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,127,414
<CGS>                                        2,261,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,564,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,302,313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,364,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   398,024
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (966,054)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (966,054)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>
#### M. E. Billingsly, Appellant, v. W. H. Craddock, Appellee

Promissory Note: fraud : burden of proof.

*Appeal from Decatur District Court.*— Hon. John W. Harvey, Judge.

*722Saturday, January 31, 1891,

Action on a promissory -note. Defense, want of consideration, and fraud in its inception. There was judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff *appeals.*

Neversed.

*T. A. Yates*and *N. P. Bullock,*for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Granger, J.

The note in suit was negotiable, and executed to C. A. Cordes, who indorsed it to the jjlaintiff. Under the defense alleged, the burden was upon the defendant to show fraud in the inception of the note, and also that the plaintiff participated therein, or took the note with knowledge thereof. The cause was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for defendant, on which the judgment is based. The appellant urges that the verdict is without support in the evidence. Appellee, with knowledge of such claim, makes no appearance to resist it,' or to indicate to us what testimony there is for its support, and, upon an examination of the record, we conclude the appellant is correct, and that the judgment should be reversed.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 

5, 2017.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-16-00917-CV

CVS PHARMACY, INC., Appellant 

V.

SANDRA HOLMES, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 268th District Court 

Fort Bend County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 16-DCV-231169 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order signed October 21, 2016. On 

December 8, 2016, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Donovan.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10874 Calendar Calendar

JOHN JOSEPH ADAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus JOHN M. TOMBONE, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CV-1321-P

- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1997 Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John Joseph Adams, federal prisoner #21595-077, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He argues that the district court erred by determining that he had no liberty interest in obtaining early release after successful completion of a substance abuse program pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Venegas v.No. 97-10874 -2- Henman , 126 F.3d 760 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EX-32.1 4 digitaltown10k022811ex32-1.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 1350   Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Paul R. Gramstad, the Chief Financial Officer Officer of DigitalTown, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:   May 4, 2011Signed:/s/ Paul R. GramstadName:Paul R. GramstadTitle:Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Financial Officer
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Davis, 138 Ohio St.3d 1218, 2014-Ohio-3.] 

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. DAVIS. 

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Davis, 138 Ohio St.3d 1218, 2014-Ohio-3.] 

(No. 2012-0687—Submitted December 30, 2013—Decided January 3, 2014.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Michael William Davis, Attorney 

Registration No. 0016994, last known business address in Fort Thomas, 

Kentucky. 

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of October 30, 2012, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 

period of one year with six months stayed on the condition that respondent 

commit no further misconduct, finds that respondent has substantially complied 

with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made 

as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 

publication. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                           2,641
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,240)
<INVENTORY>                                      9,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,836
<PP&E>                                          71,992
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,256)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,328
<SALES>                                         62,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,825
<CGS>                                           58,576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,826)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,552)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.62)


</TABLE>
Order entered April 28, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-15-00514-CV

IN RE ROBERT PAYNE WATSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 397th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 062770



### ORDER Before Justices Francis, Myers and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. Although we have considered the pe tition for writ of mandamus without payment of

the filing fee, we DENY as moot relator’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We ORDER

relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          14
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14
<PP&E>                                          60
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                1000000
<COMMON>                                    405000
<OTHER-SE>                               (50100000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1394
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              3333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (3333)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (3333)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 488

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the taxation of

social security benefits.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. GRAMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the taxation of social security benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TAXATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY

4 BENEFITS.

5 Section 86 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

6 (relating to social security and tier 1 railroad retirement

7 benefits) is amended by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(g) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to

9 taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.’’

Æ
| **Exhibit 32.2** |
|------------------|

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Insurance Company of America (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| November 10, 2005

  | By:    | /s/         Brian D. Comer |   |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

             |   | Brian D. Comer

President

 

                      |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>                 <C>              
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                 YEAR              
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998          DEC-31-1997   
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998          MAY-23-1997   
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1998          DEC-31-1997   
<CASH>                                  903,805                9,015   
<SECURITIES>                                  0                    0   
<RECEIVABLES>                            16,254                    0   
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0                    0   
<INVENTORY>                                   0                    0   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,222,171                9,015   
<PP&E>                                2,067,287                    0   
<DEPRECIATION>                        1,892,671                    0   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       37,936,227                9,015   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 4,810,551               19,946   
<BONDS>                                       0                    0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0                    0   
<PREFERRED>                                   0                    0   
<COMMON>                                 32,558               20,020   
<OTHER-SE>                                    0               30,951   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         37,396,227                9,015   
<SALES>                                  16,376                    0   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         16,376                    0   
<CGS>                                         0                    0   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         5,042,148              164,931   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0                    0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0                    0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       93,269                    0   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (5,042,148)                   0   
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0             (164,931)  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0                    0   
<DISCONTINUED>                                0                    0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0                    0   
<CHANGES>                                     0                    0   
<NET-INCOME>                         (5,042,148)            (164,931)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.20)               (0.01)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.20)               (0.01)  
                                                 


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.8



                                January 15, 2002


Arol I. Buntzman
35 E. Grassy Sprain Road
Suite 200
Yonkers, NY  10710

Dear Arol:

This will confirm our agreement regarding the shares of capital stock of
Educational Video Conferencing, Inc. owned by us. Until December 31, 2002 all of
such shares shall be voted as you direct on any matter requiring the vote or
consent of shareholders.

                                             Sincerely yours,


                                             s/ John J. McGrath
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             John J. McGrath


AGREED:


s/ Arol I. Buntzman
------------------------------------
Arol I. Buntzman
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 28, 2015

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-2629

Lower Tribunal No. 04-11052

________________



### Wallace A. Woods,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ellen Sue Venzer

, Judge.

Wallace A. Woods

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, thisCourt must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See

Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we

reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters

an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach

record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

2