alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State of Iowa, *ex rel.*P. Farrell, County Attorney, *et al.,*Appellants, v. Christian Clossner, Appellee.

Appeal: service oe notice: record: jurisdiction: practice in supreme court. Service of notice of an - appeal to the supreme-court upon the clerk of the district court is necessary to give the . supreme court jurisdiction of the cause, and, in the absence of an affirmative showing of such service in the record, a case will he dismissed by the supreme court, notwithstanding an appearance of the parties to the merits without objection to the omission as to sueh service.

*402*Appeal from Plymouth District Court.*— Hon. Soott M. Ladd, Judge.

Friday, January 29, 1892.

Action to test the right of the defendant to hold the office of school director. There was a trial on the merits, and a judgment in favor of the defendant.

*Dismissed.*

*Davis, Gantt*& *Keatley,*for appellants.

*Joy, Hudson, Call*& *Joy,*for appellee.

Bobinson, C. J.

The only statement contained in the abstract in regard to an appeal is as follows: “July, 1890, notice of an appeal to the supreme court was served upon Messrs. Joy, Hudson, Call & Joy, attorneys of record for defendant.” In order to take an appeal the notice required by statute must be served on the clerk of the court wherein the proceedings were had. Code, sec. 3178. It is necessary that the abstract show affirmatively that an appeal has been taken. *Gleason v. Collett,*77 Iowa, 448; *Schooley v. Ins. Co.,*76 Iowa, 78; *Donnelly v. Cedar Co.,*75 Iowa, 536. It is also necessary that the abstract show service of notice on the clerk as well as on the adverse party or his attorneys. *Redhead v. Baker,*80 Iowa, 163; *Hayden v. Goeppinger,*78 Iowa, 753; *McManus v. Swift,*76 Iowa, 576; *Independent Dist. v. Apperle,*76 Iowa, 238. The taking of an appeal is jurisdictional, and is not waived by the appearance of the parties to the merits of the case without objection for the failure to take an appeal. When jurisdiction is not shown, we are required to dismiss the case. *Talbort v. Noble,*75 Iowa, 169; *Plummer v. Bank,*74 Iowa, 731; *Phillips v. Follet,*69 Iowa, 39.

We dispose of cases otherwise than on their merits with reluctance, but in this case there is no alternative. Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Company’s annual report on
Form 10-K to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act.
In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification
(A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and
(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date:
      March 13, 2009/s/ Mark
      T. FrostName:
            Mark
      T. FrostTitle:
            Senior
      Vice President, Administration, Chief Financial Officer and
      Treasurer
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12
- 1018

WILLIAM A. BLAGOGEE ,

Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INCORPORATED ,

Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Anthony John Trenga , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 00680

- AJT

- TRJ )

Submitted : May 30, 2012 Decided: July 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
William A. Blagogee, Appellant Pro Se. Travis Aaron Sabalewski, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia ; Mark Edward Schaffer, REED SMITH, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia , for A ppellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2

PER CURIAM:

William A. Blagogee appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his complaint alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act , 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1601 to 1667(f) (West 2009 & Supp. 201 2 ), and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15

U.S.C. § § 1692 to 1692p (2006) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blagogee v. Santander
Consumer USA, Inc. , No. 1: 11

- cv - 00680

- AJT

- TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 29, 2011 & entered Nov. 30, 2011 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sector 10, Inc.; on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Pericles DeAvila, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





By:  /s/ Pericles
DeAvila




Name:
Pericles DeAvila


Principal
Executive Officer




February
22, 2010








38
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4831-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Virginia; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-4831-DR), dated October 1, 2024, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby amended to include the 
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of October 1, 2024.

    Scott County for Individual Assistance (already designated for 
Public Assistance, including direct Federal assistance).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24693 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 10.29.1
 
  Richard F. Daines, M.D.
    
    Wendy E. SaundersCommissioner
    
    Executive Deputy Commissioner
  
    
    
    Legislative agreement to reduce Medicaid expenditures
    
    Changes to the Medicaid Quality Incentive awards
    
    Carve-out of the pharmacy benefit from the FHP program.
 psoulisl@health.state.ny.us
 Sincerely,-s- Paul SouliskePaul SouliskePrincipal Health Care ManagementSystems AnalystBureau of Managed Care FinancingDivision of Managed Care




---



##### 



c.:
    
    Patricia KutelSusan BarthPeter HaytaianMargaret RoomsburgDebra Gorden




---



##### 



Medicaid Managed Care Rate ReportPlan Name:
    
    Amerigroup
    
    Prov ID#:
    
    01617894County Code:
    
    60
    
    County Name:
    
    ManhattanLocator Code
    
    004
    
    Region Name:
    
    NYCStart Date:
    
    10/01/08
    
    Rate Type:
    
    04DOH HMO #:
    
    09- 003

    Approved by DOB:
    
    Yes
 ****REDACTED****




---



##### 



Medicaid Managed Care Rate ReportPlan Name:
    
    Amerigroup
    
    Prov ID#:
    
    01617894County Code:
    
    37
    
    County Name:
    
    PutnamLocator Code
    
    005
    
    Region Name:
    
    Northern MetStart Date:
    
    10/01/08
    
    Rate Type:
    
    04DOH HMO #:
    
    09- 003

    Approved by DOB:
    
    Yes
 ****REDACTED****




---



##### 



Family Health Plus Rate ReportPlan Name:
    
    AmerigroupProv ID#:
    
    01617894
    
    County Name:
    
    NYCCounty Code:
    
    60
    
    Region Name:
    
    NYCLocator Code:
    
    004Start Date:
    
    10/01/08
 ****REDACTED****
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.42

                      Amendment to Stock Option Agreements

This Amendment to Stock Option Agreements is entered into as of _________ __,
2001, and amends certain Stock Option Agreements dated as of May 10, 2000 and
April 4, 2001 (the "Original Agreements") by and between Oplink Communications,
Inc. (the "Company") and Ian Jenks (the "Optionee") whereby the Optionee was
granted an option to purchase an aggregate of 425,000 shares of the Company's
common stock (the "Options").

Whereas, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it would be
in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to modify the terms of
the Options to provide for acceleration of the vesting and make certain other
changes described herein.

Now, Therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties hereby agree as
follows:

1.   Effective as of November 7, 2001, the Options granted to Optionee pursuant
     to the Original Agreements shall vest in full and become fully exercisable.

2.   Notwithstanding anything contrary in Section 9(b) of the Company's 1998
     Stock Option Plan or Section 6(h) of the Company's 2000 Equity Incentive
     Plan, the Optionee may exercise the Options until November 7, 2006. If
     Optionee does not exercise his Options before November 7, 2006, the Options
     shall terminate.

3.   Except as amended by this Amendment, the Original Agreements shall remain
     in full force and effect.

4.   This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
     laws of the State of California without giving effect to the conflicts of
     law principles thereof.

In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the
date first above written.

Oplink Communications, Inc.                          Ian Jenks

___________________________                          ___________________________
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification ofPrincipal Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Theodore S. Alpert,certify that:

(1)   Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Advanstar, Inc. (the“registrant”);

(2)   Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [Reserved]

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(d) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

(5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: April 2, 2007 | By:    |   | /s/ Ted S.  Alpert      |   |
|---------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                |   |   | Theodore S. Alpert      |
|                |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 329 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 329

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for 
 hospital care and medical services under chapter 17 of that title to 
    veterans who have been awarded the Purple Heart, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 1999

   Mr. Robb introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for 
 hospital care and medical services under chapter 17 of that title to 
    veterans who have been awarded the Purple Heart, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR HOSPITAL CARE AND MEDICAL SERVICES BASED ON 
              AWARD OF PURPLE HEART.

    (a) Eligibility.--Section 1710(a)(2) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (F);
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (G) as subparagraph (H); 
        and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the following new 
        subparagraph (G):
            ``(G) who has been awarded the Purple Heart; or''.
    (b) Enrollment Priority.--Section 1705(a)(3) of such title is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and veterans'' and inserting 
        ``veterans''; and
            (2) by inserting ``, and veterans whose eligibility for 
        care and services under this chapter is based solely on the 
        award of the Purple Heart'' before the period at the end.
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--(1) Section 1722(a) of such title is 
amended by striking ``section 1710(a)(2)(G)'' and inserting ``section 
1710(a)(2)(H)''.
    (2) Section 5317(c)(3) of such title is amended by striking 
``subsections (a)(2)(G),'' and inserting ``subsections (a)(2)(H),''.
                                 <all>
```
#### JOSEPH WALDO AND COMPANY *vs.*LEVIN JOLLY.

Where divers dealings are included in an account, the aggregate of which exceeds sixty dollars, the plaintiff can omit, or give credit for, any items he may choose, so as to bring the case within the jurisdiction of a single magistrate.

Where there is but one item of dealing, which goes beyond sixty dollars, this cannot be done.

The plaintiff cannot, however, after thus obtaining jurisdiction, prove the account under the book-debt law; for under that, he has to swear that the account sued on contains a full statement of all then' dealings.

This was an ACTION of assumpsit, begun by warrrant, and *174brought up to the Superior Court of Martin, where it was tried before SauNDERS, J., at the Fall Term, 1856.

The only question in the case was, whether, on an account containing various particulars amounting, in all, to more than sixty dollars, items could be credited so as to bring it within the jurisdiction of a single justice of the peace ; the credit being entered for that purpose only.

His Honor, upon this question, was of opinion with the plaintiff, and gave judgment accordingly ; from which the defendant ajDpealed.

*Winston, jr.,*and *Donnell,*for plaintiffs.

No counsel appeared for the defendant in this Court.

Nash, C. J.

The action commenced before a single magistrate upon an account for sixty dollars; the account was, originally, for $72,95, but upon it was a receipt for $12,96, leaving the amount claimed, as stated in the warrant. On the argument it was insisted that the account, in its legal character, was one, and could not be cut up, without the assent of the defendant, into different parts, so as to bring it within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace.

We do not agree to the proposition. It is not true in law. Where an account consists of divers, dealings of the parties at different periods of time, each dealing is a several transaction, and an action may be maintained on each. Thus, if a merchant has a store and black-smith shop, although the accounts are kept in the same book, he may bring an action upon each separately.

If there be but one dealing, as the sale of a horse at $75, the plaintiff cannot give a single justice jurisdiction, by entering a credit; but where there are separate and distinct dealings, the plaintiff may warrant upon such portion of the account as he may elect, and introduce any number of the dealings he thinks proper. In'the latter case the statute of limitations runs from the date of each dealing. See *Green*v. *Caldcleugh,*1 Dev. and Bat. 320.

*175This doctrine does not apply to actions under the book-debt law, when the plaintiff sustains his action by his own oath; because the plaintiff has to swear that the account rendered contains a true account of all the dealings.

We hold that, the plaintiff in this ease had a right to this action, without reference to the credit entered on the account, and that the magistrate had jurisdiction.

Pee Cubiam. Judgment affirmed.
### southatlantic.xls

Author: Abt Associates Inc. Created: 03/24/11

Worksheet Description

Sheet1 reports baseline impingement and entrainment

mortality losses at baseline and under regulatory options 1 through 3. Purpose: This is an output file for the south atlantic region including baseline impingement and entrainment mortality losses at baseline and under regulatory options 1 through 3.

File Info 1 of 2Species Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3

1 All forage species 21.27227 13.42818 18.13373 18.1441 9.943321 0 8.293142 8.306819 31.21559 13.42818 26.42687 26.45092 2 All harvested species 1.224446 0.772935 1.04379 1.044387 0.964742 0 0.804635 0.805962 2.189188 0.772935 1.848424 1.850348 3 Atlantic menhaden 0.251953 0.159046 0.21478 0.214903 0.029955 0 0.024984 0.025025 0.281909 0.159046 0.239764 0.239928 4 Blue crab 0.451875 0.285247 0.385205 0.385425 0 0 0 0 0.451875 0.285247 0.385205 0.385425 5 Crabs (other) 0 0 0 0 0.02253 0 0.018791 0.018822 0.02253 0 0.018791 0.018822 6 Drums and croakers 0.023755 0.014995 0.02025 0.020262 0.80124 0 0.668268 0.66937 0.824995 0.014995 0.688518 0.689632 7 Flounders 0.00351 0.002216 0.002992 0.002994 0 0 0 0 0.00351 0.002216 0.002992 0.002994 8 Fish (other) 0.014047 0.008867 0.011974 0.011981 0 0 0 0 0.014047 0.008867 0.011974 0.011981 10 Pinfish 0 0 0 0 0.006482 0 0.005406 0.005415 0.006482 0 0.005406 0.005415 11 Silver perch0.279614 0.176507 0.238359 0.238495 0 0 0 0 0.279614 0.176507 0.238359 0.238495 12 Spot 0.195755 0.123571 0.166873 0.166968 0.098421 0 0.082087 0.082222 0.294176 0.123571 0.24896 0.249191 13 Spotted seatrout 0 0 0 0 0.005206 0 0.004342 0.004349 0.005206 0 0.004342 0.004349 14 Stone crab 0.000745 0.00047 0.000635 0.000635 0 0 0 0 0.000745 0.00047 0.000635 0.000635 15 Weakfish 0.003193 0.002015 0.002722 0.002723 0.000907 0 0.000756 0.000758 0.0041 0.002015 0.003478 0.003481 16 Total (all species) 22.49672 14.20111 19.17752 19.18849 10.90806 0 9.097777 9.112781 33.40478 14.20111 28.2753 28.30127

Sheet1 2 of 2