Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 30897 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. RO BER T D H ARR ELL D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he E as t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 2: 05- C R
- 190- 1 B ef ore JO L L Y , B A R K S D A L E , an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * Ro b e r tD. Ha r r e l la p p e a l s t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r t ’ s d e n i alo f h i s 1 8 U. S . C. § 3 5 8 2 (c ) ( 2 ) mo t i o n t o r e d u c e h i s 1 6 8
- m o n t h s e n t e n c e , p u r s u a n t t o 2 1 U. S . C. §§ 84 1 (a)( 1 ) a n d84 6 , f or con sp i ra cyto distrib u te an dpo sse ss w i th the i n ten t t o di s t r ibut e 50 gr am s o r m o r e o f c o c ai ne ba s e . The m o t i o n w as based up on Am e ndm e nt7 06 t o t he Se nt e nc i ng G u i de l i ne s , w hi c h l o w e r e d t he s e nt e nc i ng United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 30897

2 r ang e s f

o ro f fe ns e s i nvo lvi ng c r ac k c o c ai n e. The di s t r i c tc o ur t , i n de nyi ng t he m o t i o n, de t e r m i ne d: H ar r e l l ’ s o r i gi nal1 68-m o nt h s e nt e nc e w as w i t hi n t he am en ded gu i del i n es r an ge of 135
- 168 m on t h s; an d i tw as app ropri ate, consi deri n g al lsentenci n g fact ors. H ar r el lm ai nt ai ns t he di st r i c tc our tarbi t r ar i l y de ni ed hi s § 35 8 2(c ) ( 2) m ot i on w i t h ou tregard t o case- speci f i c fact s, such a s hi s post - convic t i on re h a b il ita tiv e co n d u ct, orco n sid e ra tion of th e fac to rs in1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 (a ). H a rr e llco n te n d s a “se n te n cin gra n g e ov e rla p ”, b yitse lf, ca n n o t b e u se dto ju stify t h e den i alof

a redu ct i on . H e cl ai m s t h at, i f t h e di st ri ctcourtbel i evedhe d i d n ot deserve a redu ction , it s h ou l d h ave ci t ed case- speci f i c r eason s. ( B ecau se H a r r e ll’ s cla im fa ils , w e n e e dn o t r e a c h w h e th e rth is a p p e a l is b a r r e db yh is w a iv e ro f h is rig h t t o a p p e a l in h is p le a a g r e e m e n t.) T h e d e n ia l o f a§ 3 5 8 2 m o tio n is re v ie w e dfo ra b u s e o f d is c r e tio n . Un i t ed S t ate s v. B oe , 117 F . 3d 830 , 8 3 1 (5 th C i r. 199 7) . Sect i on 358 2 perm i t s a defenda n t t o m ove, un der cer t ai n circum st an ces, f or di scr et i on ary m odi f i cat i on o f hi s s e nt e nc e i f

i tw as b as e d o n as e nt e nc i ng r ange t hatt he Se nt e nc i ng C o m m is s io n la te r lo w e r e d . S ee § 3 5 8 2 (c )(2 ); Uni t e d St at e s v . G o nzalez - Bal de r as , 10 5 F .3d 9 8 1, 982 ( 5th C i r. 199 7) . R edu ct i on s un der § 3582 (c) ( 2) are not m a n d a to r y . Un itedS ta tes v. D o u b lin , 572 F . 3d 235 , 200 9 W L 1 7 4 3 6 61, at *3 ( 5t h Ci r . 22 June 20 09 ) . As n o t e d sup ra , t he di s t r i c tco ur t , i n i t s o r de rde nyi ng H ar r e l l ’ s § 35 82 (c ) ( 2) m o t i o n, s t at e d: “ The s e nt e nc e i m po s e d i s w i t hi n t he a m e n d e dg u id e lin e s ra n g e a n dis ap p rop ri a te con sider i n g a ll s e n te n c in gfa c to r s .” Thi s s t at e m e ntde m o ns t r at e s t he di s t r i c tc o ur tc al c ul at e d a nd c o ns i de r e d t he a m e n d e dg u id e lin e s ra n g e a n dco n s id e r e dth e § 3 5 5 3 fa c to r s . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. W h it ebi rd , 55 F . 3d 100 7, 101 0 ( 5th C i r. 199 5) . M oreover, t h e C rack A m en dm en tE l i gibi l i t y Inf orm ati on S h eetsh ow s the di st ri ctcou rtw as aw are of H ar r e l l ’ s no n- vi o l e nt , po s t - c o nvi c t i o n r e hab i l i t at ive c o nduc t . Fi nall y, t he r e i s no i n di cat i on t h e courtw as un der t h e m i st ak en im pressi on tha titcou l d n otreduceN o. 08- 30897

3 H a r r e ll ’s s e n te n c e fu r th e ru n d e r§ 3 5 8 2 (c )(2 ). Se eUni t e d St at e s v . Shaw , 30 F .3 d2 6 , 2 8 -2 9 (5 th C ir . 1 9 9 4 ). AF F I RMED.