alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

A report summarizing the closed meeting activities of the Art Advisory Panel during fiscal year 2023 has been prepared. A copy of this report has been filed with the Assistant Secretary for Management of the Department of the Treasury.

# DATES:

*Applicable Date:*                         This notice is applicable September 12, 2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        The report is available at                         *https://www.irs.gov/​compliance/​appeals/​art-appraisal-services.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Krista M. Floyd, AP:SPR:AREA 10:AAS, Internal Revenue Service/Independent Office of Appeals, 2203 N Lois Avenue, Tampa, FL 33607-2370, Telephone number (813) 367-8444 (not a toll free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

It has been determined that this document is not a major rule as defined in Executive Order 12291 and that a regulatory impact analysis is, therefore, not required. Additionally, this document does not constitute a rule subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6).

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 1009(d), of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and 5 U.S.C. 552b, of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

Elizabeth P. Askey,

Acting Chief, Independent Office of Appeals.

[FR Doc. 2024-23431 Filed 10-9-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### William Dougherty, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Jacob Fogle, defendant in error. William Dougherty, plaintiff in error, *vs.*William S. Chipley, defendant in error. William Dougherty, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Hampton S. Smith, defendant in error.

Id accordance with the opinion of a majority of this Court, in the cases known as the “tax cases,” at the last term of this Court, the judgment of the Court below is reversed, on the ground that the Act of October 13th, 1870, is in violation of Article I., section 10, paragraph 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

Constitutional law. Relief Act of 1870. Before Judge Harrell. Muscogee Superior Court. May Term, 1871.

The same point being involved in each of the above cases, they were decided together.

Suits were brought in favor of Dougherty against Fogle, Chipley and Smith, on causes of action accruing before June 1st, 1865. No affidavits as to the payment of taxes were filed as required by the Act of October I3th, 1870. Upon this ground the defendants moved to dismiss the actions.

The motion was sustained, and the plaintiff excepted.

A. T. Akerman; A. B. Culberson, for plaintiff in error.

*465Henry L. Benning; R. J. Moses; *W.*F. Williams, for defendants.

McCay, Judge.

In accordance with the opinion of a majority of this Court, in the cases known as the “tax cases,” at the last term of this Court, the judgment of the Court below is reversed, on the ground that the Act of October 13th, 1870, is in violation of Article I., section 10, paragraph 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

Judgment reversed.
Exhibit 23.1  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors Albany
Molecular Research, Inc.:  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements (No. 333-80477 and No. 333-91423) on Form 
S-8 of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. of our reports dated March 13,
2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Albany Molecular
Research, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement
schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007,
annual report on Form 10-K of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. and
subsidiaries. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to
changes in the method of accounting for share-based payments and pension and
other post retirement benefit obligations in 2006.  /s/ KPMG LLP Albany, New York March 13, 2008
Exhibit 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form l0-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. T. Malugen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods covered in the report.


Date:  January 19, 2007


/s/  J. T. Malugen
------------------------------------
Name:  J. T. Malugen
Its:   Chief Executive Officer
#### Farmers Co-operative Equity Union Shipping Association and another, Respondents, vs. Public Service Commission, Appellant.

*February 17*

March *14, 1944.*

*145For the appellant there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *H. T. Ferguson,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Ferguson.*

*Joseph Lieberman*of Milwaukee, for the respondents.

Martin, J.

The appellant makes the following statement in its brief:

> "If, as appears to be the law under the decision in the *United Parcel Case, supra*[*United Parcel Service v. Public Service Comm.*240 Wis. 603, 4 N. W. (2d) 138] the only evidence which the commission should consider in arriving *146at its decision was the effect of said plaintiff’s proposed operations upon congestion of the highways and the service of ‘common *motor*carriers’ and of steam and electric railways, it is frankly conceded that the evidence before the trial court showed no such effects, and the finding of that court, as to the unreasonableness of the order, is supported by the clear preponderance of the evidence. In fact, there is no evidence to show that such proposed operations would unduly congest the highways. Neither does the evidence indicate that there is any ‘common motor carrier’ or steam or electric railway which would be affected by such operations.”

The appellant contends that the doctrine as announced in *United Parcel Service v. Public Service Comm., supra,*is erroneous. Appellant urges that the decision in that case be reconsidered and overruled. We have given the case further consideration and adhere to the decision therein. It rules the instant case in favor of respondents, particularly in view of the frank concession made in appellant’s brief, above quoted.

Upon the findings, all of which are amply sustained by the evidence, under the rule in *United Parcel Service v. Public Service Comm., supra,*p. 613, that “if there is a reasonable need apparent for the use of the service and if the common carrier is not unduly interfered with nor the public highways unduly burdened, a case of convenience and necessity exists,” the application of the plaintiff Bush to amend his contract motor-carrier license should have been granted.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 447 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 447

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To deem as timely filed, and process for payment, the applications 
    submitted by the Dodson School Districts for certain Impact Aid 
                     payments for fiscal year 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPACT AID.

    The Secretary of Education shall deem as timely filed, and shall 
process for payment, an application for a fiscal year 1999 payment 
under section 8003 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703) from a local educational agency serving each of 
the following school districts if the Secretary receives that 
application not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act:
            (1) The Dodson Elementary School District #2, Montana.
            (2) The Dodson High School District, Montana.

            Passed the Senate March 2, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 447

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To deem as timely filed, and process for payment, the applications 
    submitted by the Dodson School Districts for certain Impact Aid 
                     payments for fiscal year 1999.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REPORTED IN FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>      0000925054
<NAME>     SPECTRIAN CORP /DE/
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000

<S>     <C>     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                    APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                 16,011
<SECURITIES>                           28,211  <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                          24,418
<ALLOWANCES>                              420
<INVENTORY>                            28,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      104,433
<PP&E>                                 69,652
<DEPRECIATION>                         51,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        124,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  29,822
<BONDS>                                   573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                   12
<OTHER-SE>                             93,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          124,166
<SALES>                                84,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       84,106
<CGS>                                  69,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          69,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       10,942  <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         89
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (7,653)
<INCOME-TAX>                               12
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (7,665)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          (7,665)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (0.70)  <F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.70)
<FN>
<F1> Securities, Item 5-02(2), are net of accrued interest and unrealized
     gain/loss.
<F2> Item consists of research and development.
<F3> Item consists of basic earnings per share.
</FN>




</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 459 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 459

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the State 
                   ceiling on private activity bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 1999

 Mr. Breaux (for himself and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the State 
                   ceiling on private activity bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State and Local Investment 
Opportunities Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN STATE CEILING ON PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 146(d) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to State ceiling) are amended 
to read as follows:
            ``(1) In general.--The State ceiling applicable to any 
        State for any calendar year shall be the greater of--
                    ``(A) an amount equal to $75 multiplied by the 
                State population, or
                    ``(B) $225,000,000.
        Subparagraph (B) shall not apply to any possession of the 
        United States.
            ``(2) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of a calendar year 
        after 2000, each of the dollar amounts contained in paragraph 
        (1) shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar year by 
                substituting `calendar year 1999' for `calendar year 
                1992' in subparagraph (B) thereof.
        If any increase determined under the preceding sentence is not 
        a multiple of $1 ($250 in the case of the dollar amount in 
        paragraph (1)(B), such increase shall be rounded to the nearest 
        multiple thereof.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to calendar years after 1999.
                                 <all>
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 454

To amend title 28, United States Code, to authorize the appointment of

additional bankruptcy judges for the judicial district of Maryland.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mr. SARBANES (for himself and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to authorize the

appointment of additional bankruptcy judges for the judicial district of Maryland.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BANKRUPTCY JUDGESHIPS.

4 In section 152(a)(2) of title 28, United States Code,

5 in the item relating to the judicial district of Maryland,

6 strike ‘‘4’’ and insert ‘‘8’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24604]



[[Page 84942]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 480 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-84, K2025-82.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24604 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Laehn Coal & Wood Company, Inc., Respondent, vs. Clintonville Sales Corporation and another, Appellants.*

*September 8*

October *5, 1954.*

For the appellants there was a brief by *Kaftan, Kaftan & Kaftan*of Green Bay, and *Lehner, Lehner & Behling*of Oconto Falls, and oral argument by *Adolph P. Lehner.*

*472For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *E. L. Aschenbrener*of Shawano.

*

 Motion for rehearing denied, without costs, on January 11, 1955.

Fairchild, C. J.

The complaint states the corporate existence of both the plaintiff corporation and of the defendant Sales Corporation, and the relation of defendant Umland to the defendant Clintonville Sales Corporation. It alleges that the individual and the corporation defendant are real-estate brokers operating under licenses issued by the Wisconsin real-estate brokers board. In its ruling upon the demurrers, the circuit court said: “It is apparent from the complaint that plaintiff claims causes of action against the defendants based on the contract executed between the parties, and it is proper for plaintiff to join the defendants and to set forth the proposed. causes of action against them as has been done.”

The first cause of action is based on the fact that the defendants entered into a contract with plaintiff under which defendants secured “an exclusive listing contract of business property” for its sale. The contract runs to Umland and the Clintonville Sales Corporation. It was accepted by A. R. Umland, the president of the corporation, and the defendants undertook to act as agents for plaintiff. The complaint in the trial-court action claims a breach of duty by the defendants and alleges the damages resulting from such breach to the extent of $32,185.21, for which amount recovery is asked. There is in the second cause of action an allegation that the defendants, when acting under the contract, by their negligent conduct injured the physical property of plaintiff to the extent of $5,000, for which amount plaintiff seeks recovery.

It is considered that the ruling of the trial court must be affirmed. The pleading fairly informed the defendants of what they were to meet. The causes of action are not improperly united (sec. 263.04, Stats.). A contract was entered into by defendants and accepted by plaintiff. The benefits *473contracted for have not been delivered; the property was damaged ; and the defendants are indebted to plaintiff as the facts now stand under the demurrer.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.. Cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 520 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 520

  For the relief of Janina Altagracia Castillo-Rojas and her husband, 
                        Diogenes Patricio Rojas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 1999

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Janina Altagracia Castillo-Rojas and her husband, 
                        Diogenes Patricio Rojas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Janina 
Altagracia Castillo-Rojas and her husband, Diogenes Patricio Rojas, 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Janina Altagracia 
Castillo-Rojas and her husband, Diogenes Patricio Rojas, as provided in 
this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by the appropriate number during the current fiscal year the 
total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of 
the aliens' birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2










CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, David C. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:





The Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ David C. KahnChief Financial OfficerApril 8, 2010


A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.