alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1497

DONALD SULLIVAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CARSON SMITH, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff of Pender County, North Carolina; MAJOR KEITH D. HINKLE; CAPTAIN MARK SLOAN, individually and in their capacities as officers of the Sheriff’s Department of Pender County, North Carolina; DEPUTY E. S. WYRICK, JR.; DEPUTY REED; DEPUTY GONZALES; JOE DOE, I; JOHN DOE, II; JOHN DOE III; JANE DOE, individually and in their capacities as deputies in the Sheriff’s Department of Pender County, North Carolina; COUNTY OF PENDER; MAGISTRATE DELORES R. HELMS, individually and in her capacity as an officer of the court for the Fifth Judicial District of North Carolina, Defendants - Appellees, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (7:04-cv-00026-FL) Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: De cember 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Donald Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & R ICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; David J. Adinolfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sullivan v. Smith , No. 7:04-cv-00026-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection with the Annual Report of Forum National Investments Ltd. (the  "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended September 30, 2012,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"), I, Dan Clozza, Principal Executive and I, Martin Tutschek,  Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that: 

| (1) | The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

/s/ Dan  Clozza  Dan Clozza, Principal Executive Officer   February 19, 2013

/s/  Martin Tutschek  Martin Tutschek, Principal Financial Officer   February 19, 2013

----
Facility Responses to 2011 Information Collection Request (ICR) 

The responses are on a DVD, available in the docket office.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925660
<NAME> NANOTECH CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,743
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,949)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  30
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (30)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (30)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (30)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
                                   OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Richard P.  McStravick,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer and Anthony J.
Fabiano,  Chief Financial Officer of Sound Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
each  certify in his  capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed
the annual  report of the  Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended March
31, 2005 and that to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   the report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

The purpose of this  statement  is solely to comply  with Title 18,  Chapter 63,
Section  1350 of the United  States  Code,  as  amended  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

June 10, 2005                           /s/ Richard P. McStravick
-------------                           ------------------------------------
Date                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

June 10, 2005                           /s/ Anthony J. Fabiano
-------------                           ------------------------------------
Date                                    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                       [OPTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. LETTERHEAD]


                            REVOCATION OF AGREEMENT


     I, Raymond Sery, the holder of put agreement for 200,000 shares of
common voting stock of Optical Systems, Inc., dated 15th day of January, 1998, 
a copy of which is attached, do hereby revoke that agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereby execute this revocation of agreement in 
duplicate on this, the 15th day of September, 1998. The original of this 
revocation shall be filed in the office of Optical Systems, Inc.


                                        /s/ RAYMOND SERY


WITNESS

Signature  /s/ JOHN F. CARESON
          --------------------------

Name  John F. Careson
    --------------------------------

Date March 25, 1999
    --------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, David C. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of Network-1 Security
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify to
his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




/s/ DAVID C. KAHN
----------------------
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
APRIL 11, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,111,088
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,559,431
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 39,742,421
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      15,816,192
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        15,595,106
<LOANS>                                    114,173,574
<ALLOWANCE>                                    528,202
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             178,757,130
<DEPOSITS>                                 135,840,009
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            890,739
<LONG-TERM>                                 14,677,203
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,349,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             178,757,130
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,641,133
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,786,501
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                96,761
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,524,395
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,264,381
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,3,753,942
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,770,453
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   41,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              44,685
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,981,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,025,497
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     677,497
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   677,497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.21
<LOANS-NON>                                    306,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   269,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               487,202
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              528,202
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           528,202
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        215,250
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stuart Grayston, President and chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/S/    STUART
GRAYSTON                               
|Stuart Grayston President and chief executive officer



April
2, 2007
---

**EXHIBIT 12.1**

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Daniel Clozza, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Forum
National Investments Ltd.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

The company's other certifying officers and I am responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluations; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting:
and

The company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the
design or operation of internal control of financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.



|Date: January 19, 2010 | /s/
      Daniel Clozza                                  
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                       | Daniel Clozza, Chief Executive Officer and
      Director

---
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 3144 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 110 - AD
#### Wetmore v. Harper et al.

1. Judgment: motion to modify: time of filing: Notice. A motion to modify a final decree on the ground that it was irregularly obtained should be overruled, when it is filed later than the second day of the succeeding term, and no notice thereof has been given to the adverse party. (See Code, 3156; *Kaiohsye Ins. Co. v. Duffie,*67 Iowa, 175J

*347
      *Appeal from, Guthrie Ovrcuit Oourt.*

Wednesday, December 15.

The facts are stated in tbe opinion.

*JET. E. long,*for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Seevers, J\

This was an action in equity, and the relief asked was to redeem certain real estate which had been sold for delinquent taxes to one Eogg, to whom the treasurer executed a deed in pursuance of such sale, and who conveyed to the defendant Ohauncey Harper. The court found that the tax deed was void, and that the right of redemption existed, and the plaintiff claimed the right to redeem under a judgment lien against Silas Harper, who owned the land when it was sold by the treasurer; and, it appearing that the appellant Merriam was the holder of a like judgment, the court ordered the land to be sold and the proceeds to be applied— *Fwst,*to the payment of taxes and interest; *second,*in payment of plaintiff’s judgment; and, *third,*in payment of the judgment in favor of Merriam. This decree was rendered'at the December term, 1885, and the record does not disclose that any appeal has been taken therefrom. The next term began on the eleventh day of May, 1886, and during said term, on June 1, 1886, the defendant Ohauncey Harper filed a motion to strike from the decree all that part “ which gives said Merriam affirmative relief,” on several grounds, which, if true, simply show that the relief was irregularly obtained. No notice of this motion was served on Merriam, nor did he appear thereto; but the court heard the motion, and, in substance, struck from or so modified the decree as to give Harper the relief asked in the motion, and Merriam appeals.

*348We think the court erred in granting such relief on two grounds; and the first is that the motion was not made in time, (Code, § 3156;) and the second ground is that Merriam had no notice of the motion. The decree entered at the December term was a final decree. *Hawkeye Ins. Co. v. Duffie,*67 Iowa, 175.

Eeversed.
#### LeMars National Bank, Appellee, v. Joseph Gehlen *et al.,*Appellants.

Partnership: liability as surety on note.

*Appeal from Plymouth District Court.*— Hon. Scott M. Ladd, Judge.

Tuesday, January 19, 1892.

Action at law to recover the amount of a promissoi-y note. There was a trial by the court without the aid of a jury, and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants, Gehlen Bros, and Joseph Gehlen, *appeal.*

Affirmed.

*Struble, Eisvhel Sari,*for appellants.

No appearance for appellees.

Robinson, C. J.

The note upon which this action is brought is for the sum of eight hundred and fifty dollars, dated January 9, 1886, payable to the plaintiff, sixty days after date, with ten per cent, interest after maturity, and purports to be signed by William II. Kurtz, Gehlen Bros., and J. H. Gehlen. Gehlen Bros, and Joseph Gehlen filed an answer, in which they denied liability on the note, and averred that, when the note was made, the firm of Gehlen Bros, was a partnership, of *717which John H. Gehlen and Joseph Gehlen were the only partners; that the firm carried on the business of operating a mill, making flour and feed, and buying grain for milling purposes, and selling and shipping grain, flour, and feed; that the firm name was attached to the note as surety by John .H. Gehlen, without the knowledge or consent of Joseph Gehlen, and without authority, and for a purpose not within the scope of the partnership business. The court found that the firm of Gehlen Bros, received four hundred and fifty dollars of the consideration for which the note was given, and rendered judgment for that amount, with interest at ten per cent, per annum, an attorney’s fee of thirty-seven dollars and sixty-four cents, and costs, against the firm and Joseph Gehlen and in favor of the plaintiff. There is an irreconcilable conflict in the evidence, that offered on the part of the plaintiff tending to show that Gehlen Bros, received four hundred and fifty dollars of the money for which the note was given, and that it was the custom of the firm to sign notes as surety; also that Joseph Gehlen had recognized liability on the note on the part of himself and the firm. The evidence on the part of the defendants tended to show that the note in suit was a renewal of one given in the year 1884 by Kurtz, which had been signed by Gehlen Bros, as surety; but the testimony of Kurtz, given in behalf of the defendants, in some respects corroborates the evidence for the plaintiff, in admitting that some of the money for which the note was given was received by Gehlen Bros. The claim of the plaintiff is also corroborated in other respects. It would serve no good purpose to set out the evidence at length. It is sufficient to say that it so far supports the finding and judgment of the district court that we are not authorized to set them aside. As the note was a valid obligation on the part of the firm and its members for the amount of the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and as the note provided for the payment of a reasonable attorney’s fee, it was not error to allow for that purpose the sum specified in the judgment. Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. WILLIAM MICKELSON, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 570 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 29th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### Knaack, Appellant, vs. Knaack, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Earl E. Schumacher*of Beaver Dam.

For the respondent: *Lueck, Skupniewitz & Lueck*of Beaver Dam.

*By the Court.*

Judgment and order affirmed.