alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# AGENCY:

 United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

The United States Mint announces 2024 revisions within the Numismatic Gold, Commemorative Gold, Platinum, and Palladium Products Grid to include pricing for the Flowing Hair 24K gold proof coin.

A draft of the grid with price range for the Flowing Hair 24K One-Ounce Gold Proof Coin appears in the table below.

                    The complete 2024 Pricing of Numismatic Gold, Commemorative Gold, Platinum, and Palladium Products Grid will be available at                     *https://www.usmint.gov/​content/​dam/​usmint/​shop/​Pricing-Grid.pdf.*

Pricing can vary weekly dependent upon the London Bullion Market Association gold, platinum, and palladium prices weekly average. The pricing for all United States Mint numismatic gold, platinum, and palladium products is evaluated every Wednesday and modified as necessary.
      ( print page 85586)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Derrick Griffin; Sales and Marketing Directorate; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW, Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7579.                              ( print page 85587)    

*Authority:*31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, & 9701.                    

Eric Anderson,

Executive Secretary,  United States Mint.

BILLING CODE 4810-37-P

[FR Doc. 2024-24989 Filed 10-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-37-C
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #20658 and #20659; CALIFORNIA Disaster Number CA-20024]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of California dated 10/23/2024. *Incident:*
                         Bridge Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         09/08/2024 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 10/23/2024. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/23/2024. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/23/2025.
 ADDRESSES: *Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*
                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be submitted online using the MySBA Loan Portal 
                    *https://lending.sba.gov*
                     or other locally announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
                    *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov*
                     or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Los Angeles *Contiguous Counties:* California: Kern, Orange, San Bernardino, Ventura The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.625Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.813Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250*For Economic Injury:*Business and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 206585 and for economic injury is 206590. The States which received an EIDL Declaration are California. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2024-25063 Filed 10-28-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
#### I. N. Craig, Appellant, v. Wm. Plunkett, Appellee.

Intoxicating Liquors: nuisanoe : sales for lawful purpose: without permit. In an action for the abatement of a liquor nuisance it appeared that the defendant was a physician and druggist, and that he had sold intoxicating liquors for medicinal purposes, without having a permit to sell as required by law, and that his. place of business was reputed as being a place where intoxicating liquors were sold. *Held,*that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the charge against the defendant, and that the plaintiff was entitled to have an injunction issue, and to recover his attorney’s fee.

*Appeal from Des Moines District Court.*— Host. Charles II. Phelps, Judge.

Wednesday, May 20, 1891.

The petition alleges that the defendant was the owner of a certain lot and building, and that he kept and maintained upon said premises “ a place for the sale of intoxicating liquors as a beverage, and the defendant, has sold, and continues to sell, intoxicating liquors at said place as a beverage,” asking the abatement of the nuisance, and that an injunction issue. The defendant, answered, denying generally, and the case was tried to the court, and a decree entered, dismissing the petition,, and rendering judgment against the plaintiff for costs,, from which he *appeals.*

Reversed.

*Newman & Blalce,*for appellant.

*W. B. Culbertson,*for appellee.

Given, J.

The only question involved is whether, under the evidence, the court should not have found for the plaintiff. The defendant was a practicing physician, and kept a drugstore; but it is not claimed that he had authority to sell intoxicating liquors for any purpose. Three witnesses testify to each of them having, purchased a small quantity of alcohol from defendant.. *475The defendant, in his testimony, denies having sold alcohol to one of the witnesses ; admits the sale to another hut says it was for the purpose of mixing a liniment, and does not distinctly deny the other sale. There was also testimony tending to show that the defendant’s place was reputed as being a place where intoxicating liquors were sold.

The defendant seems to rely upon the mitigating-circumstances under which and the purposes for which the sales were made, and that the alcohol was not sold “asa beverage” as charged. The defendant not having-authority to sell to any person for any purpose, the circumstances and purposes cannot be a justification. The charge that the liquors were sold as a beverage is mere surplusage, the defendant being alike liable-whether the sales were for that purpose or any other. We think it very clear that the allegations of the-petition were fully sustained, and that a decree should have been entered as prayed. The decree of the district court is, therefore, reversed, and a decree will be entered for the plaintiff as prayed, including an attorney’s fee for the plaintiff’s attorney of fifty dollars for services in. the district court. Reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
389 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-75, K2025-73.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24611 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00178

- CR

R UDOLPH G UY

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On App eal from Criminal District

Court No. 2

of Tarrant County ( 1578056 )

Sept ember 7 , 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief

Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be di sm issed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
#### Dolly Madison Dairies, Inc., and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

For the appellants: /. *A. Bloomquist*and *Quarles, Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Kenneth Grubb*and *Howard T. Foulkes*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*655For the respondent Industrial Commission: *John E. Martin,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondent Mrs. Mary K. Howard: *Hale & Skemp*of La Crosse.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 24, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 395 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-96, K2025-94.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24618 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cardo Medical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I Andrew Brooks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ ANDREW  A. BROOKS
                      Andrew A. BrooksChief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  May 15, 2009

---
Exhibit
      32




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report” ), I, Hyung Soon Lee,
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)the
      Report fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934; and





(2)the
      information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May
      14, 2007


/S/
      Hyung
      Soon Lee


Principal
      Executive Officer


Principal
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84923-84924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24700]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Notice of Maximum Amount of Assistance Under the Individuals and 
Households Program

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice of the maximum amount for assistance under 
the Individuals and Households Program for emergencies and major 
disasters declared on or after October 1, 2024.

DATES: This adjustment applies to emergencies and major disasters 
declared on or after October 1, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Matranga, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 212-1000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (the Stafford Act), 42 
U.S.C. 5174, prescribes that FEMA must annually adjust the maximum 
amount for assistance provided under the Individuals and Households 
Program (IHP). FEMA gives notice that the maximum amount of IHP 
financial assistance provided to an individual or household under 
section 408 of the Stafford Act with respect to any single emergency or 
major disaster is $43,600 for housing assistance and $43,600 for other 
needs assistance. The increase in award amount is for any single 
emergency or major disaster declared on or after October 1, 2024. In 
addition, in accordance with 44 CFR 61.17(c), this increases the 
maximum amount of

[[Page 84924]]

available coverage under any Group Flood Insurance Policy (GFIP) 
issued.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 2.5 percent for the 12-month period, 
which ended in August 2024. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. 
Department of Labor released the information on September 11, 2024.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.048, Federal Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared 
Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and 
Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to 
Individuals and Households--Other Needs.)

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24700 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           11395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       5610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 20005
<PP&E>                                           80969
<DEPRECIATION>                                   10364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   90611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1530
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         11645
<OTHER-SE>                                       17436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     90611
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 87194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (87194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (87194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (87194)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.0)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**LEROY N. BERRY, LAWRENCE H.**
**DUPPINS, WILLIAM J. MALIZIA, JR.,**

**AARON J. STANFORD ON BEHALF OF**

**THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS**
**SIMILARLY SITUATED,**

**Petitioners**

**v.**

**CITY OF PHILADELPHIA,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 276 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
1

Filed 12/27/23 P. v. Anguiano CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not 

certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been 

certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY

ANGUIANO,

Defendant and Appellant.

A166350

(Napa County Super. Ct. 

No. 21CR000719)

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

In April 2021, two brothers — Mike and Gary L. — were in a car in a 

Napa liquor store parking lot driving towards the exit when Christopher 

Anthony Anguiano blocked their car with his truck. Anguiano got out of his

truck, approached the brothers’ car, “pulled out a knife,” and swung it “back 

and forth” in front of them.

A jury convicted Anguiano of two counts of misdemeanor exhibiting 

a deadly weapon — one for each brother (§ 417, subd. (a)(1); counts 7 & 

8) — and other crimes, including felonies. Various special allegations were 

either admitted or found true. The trial court imposed a prison term of four 

1 We resolve this case by memorandum opinion, reciting only those 

facts necessary to resolve the limited issue before us. (Cal. Stds. Jud. Admin., 

§ 8.1.) Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
2

years on the felony convictions and associated special allegations. For each of 

the two convictions for exhibiting a deadly weapon, the court ordered 

concurrent time served in county jail.

On appeal, Anguiano contends — and the Attorney General 

concedes — one of the convictions for exhibiting a deadly weapon should be 

stricken.

2 We agree. Exhibiting or brandishing “a deadly weapon in the 

presence of another person is not a crime of violence ‘upon’ that person, but is 

committed in someone’s presence. . . . Thus, a single act of brandishing can 

only support a conviction of a single count of violation of section 417, 

subdivision (a)(1), no matter how many people witness the act.” (In re Peter F.

(2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 877, 881.) Here, Anguiano committed a single

violation of exhibiting a deadly weapon when he wielded a knife in the

presence of the brothers.

Disposition

Count 8 is stricken. The trial court is directed to amend the October 7, 

2022 sentencing minute order reflecting that count 8 is stricken. As modified, 

the judgment is affirmed.

2 Anguiano does not contest any aspect of this case other than the two 

misdemeanor convictions for brandishing.
3

HIRAMOTO, J.

*

WE CONCUR:

BROWN, P. J.

GOLDMAN, J.

People v. Anguiano (A166350)

 Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa, 

assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the 

California Constitution.