alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 322 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 96
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 322

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add the Martin Luther King Jr. 
  holiday to the list of days on which the flag should especially be 
                               displayed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 1999

Mr. Campbell (for himself, Mr. Brownback, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Grams, Mr. 
      Jeffords, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. Kerrey, Mr. 
   Rockefeller, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Reid, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Allard, Mr. 
   Ashcroft, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Edwards, Mr. 
  Levin, Mr. Cleland, Mrs. Feinstein, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. 
 Robb, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Torricelli, and Mr. 
    DeWine) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             April 29, 1999

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to add the Martin Luther King Jr. 
  holiday to the list of days on which the flag should especially be 
                               displayed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY TO LIST OF DAYS.

    Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, third Monday in 
January;'' after ``January 20;''.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 96

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 322

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add the Martin Luther King Jr. 
  holiday to the list of days on which the flag should especially be 
                               displayed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 29, 1999

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Melcher, Appellant, vs. Melcher, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Alfred G. Zeeb,*attorney, and *Carl H. Jtiergens*of counsel, both of Milwaukeé.

For the respondent: *O’Melia & Kaye*of Rhinelander.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose
whatsoever.

Date:  March 30, 2004                Name:  /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Sheldon C. Fenton
                                     Title: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   100
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         10550
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       534
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 17566
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17566)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17566)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17566)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.0)
November 09, 2011 

Mr. Steven Randall 

2833 Alnwick Avenue, Unit 13 

Livermore, CA 94551 

Dear Mr. Randall: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 61.195(b) and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we 

cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your October 17, 2011, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-

1180), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

 The specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside 

the United States. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Ida M. Klepper 

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### STATE *v.*CEPHUS HUDSON.

Where the jury return a verdict of “guilty of shooting,” upon an. indictment for an assault and battery, drawn in the usual form, judgment will be arrested.

Whether, if the bill had charged that tbe assault-was made, by shooting at the prosecutor, the verdict could be sustained, *Quere ? {State*v. Arrington, 3 Murphy 571, cited and approved.)

INDICTMENT for *Assault*and *Battery,*tried before bis Honor *Waits, J.*at Fall Term, 1875, of tbe Superior Court of -GteaNville county.

Tbe indictment was drawn for an assault and battery in tbe usual form.

Tbe jury returned a verdict of “guilty of shooting” and thereupon tbe counsel for the prisoner moved tbe court in arrest of judgment.

Tbe motion was overruled and tbe defendant appealed.

No counsel in this court for the defendant.

*Attorney General llaryrove,*for tbe State.

Btnum, J.

Tbe defendant was indicted for an assault and 'battery, in a bill drawn in tbe ordinary form. Tbe jury for their verdict returned “ that the said Cephas Hudson is guilty -of shooting.” Shooting at wrhat ? In what direction ? If at any human object, was that object within the carrying distance of the gun, so as to constitute an assault ? If the indictment had charged that the assault was made by shooting at the prosecutor, possibly the verdict could be sustained by the reasonable certainty of its meaning, to be obtained by construing the bill and verdict together. But the instrament contains no such charge, and the verdict standing by itself is therefore senseless, certainly it is not responsive to the indictment. The courts should never allow such absurd and irre-*247sponsive verdicts to be recorded. They should have the jury to correct them, so as to be in conformity to law and to present an intelligent record. *State*v. *Arrington,*3 Murph. 511. There is error.

Per Curiam. Judgment arrested.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 486 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-94, K2025-92.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24610 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September , 2011 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date: September 28, 2011/s/ Richard L. Feinstein
Richard L. Feinstein
Chief Financial Officer
#### WILLIAM A. MOORE v. MOSES HOBBS and ABRAM T. BUSH.

*P leading*— Demurrer—Answer.

;.If the cause assigned for demurrer does not appear in the complaint it can he taken advantage of only by answer.

Civil ActioN tried at Spring Term, 1877,.of ChowaN Superior Court, before *Cannon, J.*

The. defendants demurred to the complaint. His Honor -overruled the demurrer and gave judgment for plaintiff and tfche defendants appealed.

*66■ *Messrs. Mullen $ Moore,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Gilliam ¿> Pruden,*for defendants.

Read®, J.

The causes assigned for demurrer do not ap--pear in the complaint, and therefore can be taken advantage of only by answer.

The case will be remanded to the end that the defendants-may answer, and on failure to do which there should be-judgment for plaintiff.

We call attention to the fact that C. C. P. § 91, requires-that the “complaint” should contain “a plain and concise-statement of the facts constituting the cause of’ action.” It' may be that the complaint in this case is at fault in that'particular. If so, it may be amended by leave.

There was no error in overruling the. demurrer but there^ was error in giving judgment for the demand without allow'-ing an answer. Bat: Rev. ch. 17, § 181.

Case remanded. Each party will pay his own costs in this* Court.

Per Cukiam. Judgment accordingly-
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Colleen Ewanchuk, the Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Elan Development Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the quarter  ended January 31, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                        



| | By:    | /s/Colleen Ewanchuk              
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        |                                  
| | Name:  | Colleen Ewanchuk                 
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | March 17, 2008                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                     LOGIX COMMUNICATIONS ENTERPRISES, INC.
                           EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                     --------------------------------------------
                                                                         1996           1997            1998
                                                                     -------------  -------------  --------------
<S>                                                                  <C>            <C>            <C>
Income (loss) before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of
  change in accounting principle...................................  $     331,058  $     549,629  $  (38,800,885)
Extraordinary item.................................................             --       (217,488)             --
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle................             --             --        (699,447)
                                                                     -------------  -------------  --------------
Net income (loss)..................................................  $     331,058  $     332,141  $  (39,500,332)
                                                                     -------------  -------------  --------------
                                                                     -------------  -------------  --------------
 
Basic net income (loss) per common share:
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding.........................     71,250,000     71,250,000      71,250,000
 
Income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change
  in accounting principle..........................................  $       0.005  $       0.008  $       (0.545)
 
Extraordinary item.................................................  $          --  $      (0.003) $       (0.545)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle................             --             --          (0.009)
                                                                     -------------  -------------  --------------
Basic net income (loss) per common share...........................  $       0.005  $       0.005  $       (0.554)
                                                                     -------------  -------------  --------------
                                                                     -------------  -------------  --------------
</TABLE>
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0351

SAT Date: 5/18/2012

Print Date: 4/27/2015

Related cases: Yes

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: Analogs: P-01-347, L-99-269.

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: intact material

2 3 Health: Per-F Acid ; Eco: high concern for toxicity of incomplete incinera

products to terrestrial organisms

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 1 1 PMN

3 3 2 Deg Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: No exposures needed for PMN substance; Drinking 

Water and Inhalation for the Per-F Acid

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: Per-F acid: LIVER; BLOOD; MALE REPRO; IMMUNOTOX; 

ONCO; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0351

FATE: MW = 4911 with 0.01% < 500 and 2.35% < 1000

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

S = Negl.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)
POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Deg Pdt P3B3 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes (pchem). No significant 

health concerns for the PMN substance.

For the potential incomplete incineration product, based on test data for perfluorohexanoic acid 

concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral 

NOAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 

mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 

mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral study that were judged 

by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive toxicity. There is also 

concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data for PFOA and PFOS.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions based on SARs for nonionic polymers; Ecotox 

chemical class: polymer-nonionic-siloxane-perfluoroC6; MW 4911 with 2.35% < 1000 and 0% 

< 500; S < 0.001 mg/L at 20 C (P); pH 7; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; ECs based on 

100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

high concern for the perFC6-COOH stable degradation product;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*
SARs nonionic polymers

SAR Class polymer-nonionic-siloxane-perfl

uoroC6

Ecotox Category Nonionic Polymers

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
Exhibit 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I,  Edward  N. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of FoneFriend, Inc ( the "Company"
), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  that:

     The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three months
ended  December 31, 2003 (the " Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13  (a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934; and

     The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 26, 2004



                         /S/  Edward  N.  Jones
                         ----------------------
                         Edward N. Jones, Chief Financial Officer