alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**














CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










I,
      William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the hi/fn,
      inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
      Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of hi/fn, inc.







November
                14, 2007
            /s/
                WILLIAM R. WALKERWilliam
                R. WalkerChief
                Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Labor Relations Board

# AGENCY:

National Labor Relations Board.

# ACTION:

Notice; appointment to serve as members of performance review boards.

# SUMMARY:

The National Labor Relations Board is issuing this notice that the individuals whose names and position titles appear below have been appointed to serve as members of performance review boards in the National Labor Relations Board for the rating year beginning October 1, 2023 and ending September 30, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roxanne L. Rothschild, Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, 1015 Half Street SE, Washington, DC 20570, (202) 273-1940 (this is not a toll-free number), 1-866-315-6572 (TTY/TDD).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Name and Title

Joan A. Sullivan—Associate General Counsel, Division of Operations Management

Peter Sung Ohr -Deputy General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel

Nancy Kessler Platt—Associate General Counsel, Division of Legal Counsel

Andrew Krafts—Executive Assistant to the Chairman (Chief of Staff), The Board

Grant Kraus—Deputy Chief Counsel, The Board

Ruth Burdick—(alternate) Deputy Associate General Counsel, Division of Enforcement Litigation, Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Branch

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).                

By Direction of the Board.

Dated: October 23, 2024.

Roxanne L. Rothschild,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-25036 Filed 10-28-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7127

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHUNGA HAKI MATATA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, 

District Judge. (4:94-cr-00044-LHT-12)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chunga Haki Matata, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chunga Haki Matata seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the 

order reducing his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Matata, No. 4:94-cr-00044-LHT-12 

(W.D.N.C. May 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, James A. Mallak, Chief Financial Officer of Tower Automotive, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2006 of Tower Automotive, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design and oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:February 27, 2007     /s/ James A. Mallak     James A. Mallak     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32


|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Social Cube Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Byung Jin Kim, Chief Executive Officer and I, Jonathan Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Byung Jin Kim Byung Jin Kim Chief Executive Officer Date: April 15, 2014  /s/ Jonathan Lee Jonathan Lee Chief Financial Officer Date: April 15, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
         EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30, 1999 BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENTS
         OF INCOME AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
         ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<PERIOD-TYPE> 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END> JUN-30-1999

<S>                               <C>
<CASH>                               304
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                      3,355
<ALLOWANCES>                          38
<INVENTORY>                       15,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  19,813
<PP&E>                            45,163
<DEPRECIATION>                     9,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    56,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              5,969
<BONDS>                           27,127
<COMMON>                          14,491
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              2,288
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                         4,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      56,552
<SALES>                           10,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  10,904
<CGS>                              4,969
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      4,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   3,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    1,720
<INCOME-TAX>                         692
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                1,028
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       1,028
<EPS-BASIC>                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .14


</TABLE>
<Page>

                        Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our report dated
February 17, 2000 on the financial statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company and our report dated March 29, 2000 on the financial statements of
Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D, incorporated by
reference, in Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the registration statement
(Form N-4 No. 33-63935) and related Prospectus and Statement of Additional
Information of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company for the registration of
flexible premium deferred combination variable and fixed annuity contracts.

                                                     /s/  Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 26, 2001
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Laura A. Hesselberg, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

August 14, 1937.

*Paul T. Davis,*or the proponents.

*Samuel Gursky,*for Henry C. Weeks, distributee.

*Arthur A. Beaudry,*for Harriet P. Hawkins, contestant.

*Vincent A. Catoggio,*special guardian.

Delehanty, S.

A distributee of deceased seeks in this application to open a default deliberately suffered by him in the proceeding for the probate of deceased’s will. It is quite apparent from his moving papers and from the argument advanced in his behalf by his counsel that his present application is made not because he has any information which warrants a belief that he could challenge the will successfully but because since his default he learned that another distributee who had filed objections has entered into an *498agreement with proponents under which she may receive some portion of the net estate. It is quite clear to the court that the present application is made in the hope that if leave to open the default is granted the moving party may obtain some similar agreement.

The moving affidavits are wholly insufficient to establish any likelihood of success. On the argument it was urged that in the examination of the proponents and the subscribing witnesses there would be found support for the claim that a successful attack upon the will could be made. Pursuant to request of the mov ng party the court has read the testimony given in that examination. Far from supporting the application the minutes of that examination substantially negative the possibility of any successful attack upon the will by any person. There is here, therefore, no basis upon which the court should grant to the moving party an opportunity to speculate in a litigation over deceased's will. *(Matter of Jones,*147 Misc. 898; affd., 240 App. Div. 817; appeal dismissed, 264 N. Y. 401. See also 155 Misc. 49; *Matter of Elias,*222 App. Div. 728; *Matter of Leslie,*175 id. 108.) The application is denied, with costs of the motion.

Submit, on notice, order accordingly.
4Midable Imagery, LLC 

140 Alexander Avenue 

Snowmass, CO 81654 

970-688-0167 

jari@4midableimagery.com 

December 12, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption Under Section 333 of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations for Party 

Clarification; Exemption No. 13288; Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-3280 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

On October 22, 2015, the Federal Aviation Administration granted 4Midable Imagery an 

exemption pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the 

"Exemption") to allow 4Midable Imagery to conduct commercial operations with its TBS 

Discovery Pro, Tarot x6, and Dll SlOOO unmanned aircraft for the collection of aerial data1• 

Since that time, 4Midable Imagery, LLC was created under the laws ofthe State of Colorado. 

4Midable Imagery seeks an amendment to the Exemption to clarify that the "petitioner" and/or 

the "operator" referenced in the Exemption shall refer to 4Midable Imagery, LLC in all respects. 

For the avoidance of doubt, 4Midable Imagery, LLC shall be bound by all conditions to, and 

limitations of, the Exemption. 

;;:;-~ Jari Lindholm 

4Midable Imagery, LLC 

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. Examples 

include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF analysis, 

etc.), chemical measurement (particulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by instruments aboard 

the UA. See Exemption, n.l. 

I
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT (23)-1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333-70953, No. 333-72747, No. 333-58170, No. 333-123397, and No.
333-123398) of The Banc Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated March
16, 2006, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of The
Banc Corporation and subsidiaries, The Banc Corporation and subsidiaries'
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
The Banc Corporation and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Our report dated March 16, 2006,
expressed an opinion that The Banc Corporation and subsidiaries had not
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO).


/s/ Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC

Montgomery, Alabama
March 16, 2006
No. 49.

#### Jacksonville Nat. Bk. v. Edward C. Lax et al.

This was a suit brought by the bank against defendants E. 0- and Mewark Lax on a note dated April 20,1848, for $1,500, due in six months, purporting to be signed by the defendants and payable to the bank; afterward an attachment in aid was sued out alleging a fraudulent conveyance by Mewark Lax; defendants filed several pleas upon which issue was joined, trial had and verdict rendered, which was set aside and new trial awarded. On Dec. 12, 1884, defendant Mewark Lax filed a plea of *non*
      *655
      *est faatvmb*sworn to, and upon trial a verdict was found for the defendants, and judgment rendered against plaintiff for costs.. From all the evidence in relation to the genuineness of the signature of ¡Newark Lax upon the note, the court is of opinion the jury were fully justified in finding his signature thereto a forgery, and it follows as a necessary consequence that the whole case fails, and errors in other branches of the case are immaterial.

Judgment affirmed.

Judge below, Cyrus Epler.

Attorneys, for appellant, ¡Messrs. Moeeison & Whitlock;

for appellee, Messrs. Baenes & Gallon.

Opinion filed Dec. 4, 1885.

Opinion by Conger, J.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 13, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00508

- CV

Rudy MENDEZ

, Appellant

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD

, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 08659 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Appellant has filed an affidavit of indigence. T he clerk, court reporter, or any party who desires to challenge appellant’s claim of indigence is hereby ORDERED to do so by filing a

contest to the affidavit in the trial court no later than ten days from the date of this order

. T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 20.1(e).

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(h)(4), we abate this case to

the trial court:

A. To conduct a hearing or sign an order extending the time to conduct a hearing within ten days after the contest is filed; provided, however, that the time for conducting a hearing on the contest must not be extended for

more than twenty days from the date the trial court signs its order extending the time to conduct the hearing. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(i)(2) ,(3) and

B. To determine whether or not the appeal is frivolous if no contest is

filed or if a contest is overruled. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 13.003 ( West 2002).The trial court is hereby ORDERED to prepare a written order and written findings of

fact and conclusions of law regarding its indigence determination and its determination with regard to whether the appeal is frivolous.

The trial court clerk is hereby ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record as soon a s practicable after the trial court enters its order and written findings and conclusions but in no event later than 60 days from the date of this order , containing: (1) the contest or a certificate stating no contest was filed: (2) the trial court’s order; (3) the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law; (4) the judgment being appealed; (5) any post

- judgment motions; (6) the notice of appea l; and (7) the court’s docket sheet; provided, however, that if the trial court sustains the contest, and the appellant files a motion in this court seeking review of the trial court’s order, the supplemental clerk’s record must be filed no later than thre e days from the date the appellant files his motion seeking review.

The court reporter is hereby ORDERED to file a reporter’s record of the hearing as soon as practicable but in no event later than sixty days from the date of this o rder ; provided,

howev er, that if the trial court sustains the contest, and the appellant files a motion in this court seeking review of the trial court’s order, the reporter’s record of the hearing must be filed no later than three days from the date the appellant files his mo tion seeking review.

It is so ORDERED on November 13, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Disposition of Comments

QPM#

AIR-ANM-Q30-F2

Date: June 13, 2008

Revi13ion

1

Page 1 of 1

Comments In Response to FAA Final Rule; Request for Comments

-0430

Docket: FAA-2010-4939- Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-098-AD

Comments have been received in response to: "Final rule; request/or comments,"

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above.

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted.

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenler(s) name(s) and check the

appropriate rejponse below. Include additional informarionfollowing the appropriate response,

if necessary. Then type in your name and date in Ihe spaces provided, and return il TO: James

C. Johnson, ANM-J /4.)

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from:

Delta Airlines, The Boeing Company and American Airlines.

(Please check olle.)

_X_ These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant

reconsideration or revision of this AD.

___ These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual

FAA-IR-M-8040.IA, p"r"graph 2/.d., FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

Dale:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)

UNCONTROLLED COpy WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
Exhibit 23.1

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

       Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-8 (Nos. 333-83171, 333-136016 and333-37000) and Form S-3 (No. 333-129024) of NIC Inc. of our report dated March13, 2007 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Kansas City, Missouri