alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Commercial E-Waste Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brenda Pfeifer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Eugene Pfeifer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Brenda Pfeifer

     Brenda Pfeifer

     Chief Executive Officer 

     August 12, 2008

 

/s/Eugene Pfeifer

    Eugene Pfeifer

    Chief Financial Officer

    August 12, 2008
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00889-CR

David MORIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR7024W

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 8, 2012

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is granted, and this appeal is 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). 

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.1


                  Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:

a.    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                        /s/ Clark M. Mower
Date:   May 12, 2005                    ____________________________________
                                        Clark M. Mower
                                        Chief Executive Officer



                                        /s/ John A. Sindt
Date:   May 12, 2005                    ____________________________________
                                        John A. Sindt
                                        Principal Financial Officer
*November 9, 1943.*

#### Peterson, Respondent, vs. Due and another, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Cavernagh, Stephenson & Mittelstaed*of Kenosha.

For the respondent: *L. E, Vaudreuil*of Kenosha.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### Sherzer and Company, Appellant, v. D Buckholz and Mrs Buckholz.

Contract: performance. Where plaintiff contracted to build a well and to secure a supply of water, or to receive no pay, and no water was secured, and the well was bored so crookedly that a pump could not have been placed therein, he cannot recover on the contract.

*Appeal from Osceola District Court—*Hon F. B.. Gaynor, Judge.

Saturday, April 8, 1899.

Action in equity to establish a mechanic’s lien, and for judgment and decree foreclosing the same, under a contract for digging a well for the defendant D. Buckholz. issues were joined, and, on trial bad, judgment was entered dismissing plaintiffs’ petition, from which they *appeal.*

— Affirmed.

*W. P. Briggs*for appellants.

*Boies da Both*for appellees.

Given, J.

— Plaintiffs and defendant Buckholz entered' into a verbal contract by which the plaintiffs were to dig a. *750well on defendant's premises, in pursuance of which plaintiffs set their machinery and sank the well to a depth of from one hundred aud forty to one hundred and sixty-five feet. The material dispute is as to what the contract was. Plaintiffs claim that they were to have forty cents a foot for the first forty feet, and that, failing to get water at that depth, it was agreed that they should have ten cents per foot additional for the next ten feet, and ten cents additional for every ten feet thereafter; defendants to furnish, and they to put in, the curbing. The defendants concede that the contract was, as to price, as claimed, and claim that the plaintiffs were to get a supply of water or no pay. Defendants also alleged that the well that was bored was so crooked that a pump could not be placed therein. Defendants set up a counterclaim for boarding the plaintiff and their hands and horses during the time they were boring the well, but as nothing was allowed them on this counterclaim, and they have not appealed, it is not before us for consideration. We will not set out the evidence. It is sufficient to say that we think it sustains the claim of the defendants that the plaintiffs were to secure a supply of water, or to receive no pay, and that they failed to secure the supply of water. It is also shown that the well was bored so crookedly that a pump could not have been placed therein, even if a supply of water had been secured. We think the plaintiffs failed to establish their right to a judgment and that their petition was properly dismissed. — Affiiímed.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Subsidiary                                              Country or State of Organization
------------------                                              --------------------------------
<S>                                                             <C>
AremisSoft Norway AS                                            Norway corporation
AremisSoft (E.E.M.E.A) Limited                                  Cryprus corporation
AremisSoft (UK) Plc                                             United Kingdom corporation
AremisSoft Hospitality (Switzerland) GmBH                       Switzerland corporation
AremisSoft Hospitality (US), Inc.                               Delaware corporation
AremisSoft Australia Pty Ltd.                                   Australia corporation
AremisSoft (HK) Corporation Ltd.                                Hong Kong corporation
AremisSoft Hospitality (UK) Ltd.                                United Kingdom corporation
AremisSoft Manufacturing (US), Inc.                             Delaware corporation
ennovation.com                                                  India corporation
Impact Level (M) Sdn. Bhd.                                      Malaysia corporation
Latin America One Pte Ltd.                                      Singapore corporation
LK Global Software Engineering (India) Private Ltd.             India corporation
LK Global Information Systems BV                                Netherlands corporation
LK Global Manufacturing (US) Inc.                               Delaware corporation
Online Applications, Inc.                                       Delaware corporation
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  The
undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the Company)
hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Companys annual report on Form 10-K
to which this certification is attached (the Report), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this
certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and
(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.  Date:
  March 17, 2008/s/ THOMAS E. DAMBRA, PH.D.Name:
  Thomas
  E. DAmbra, Ph.D.Title:
  Chairman
  of the Board, President, ChiefExecutive
  Officer and Director
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00278-CV

Susan Rebecca CAMMACK,

Appellant

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee for the 

Certificateholders of CWABS 2004-05,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17902C

Honorable Susan Harris, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. It is ordered that no costs of appeal shall be assessed against appellant in relation to 

this appeal because she qualifies as indigent under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.

SIGNED May 8, 2019.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
EXIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sector 10, Inc.; on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Pericles DeAvila, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








By:  /s/ Pericles DeAvila





Name: Pericles DeAvila


Principal Executive Officer





February 14, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                         496,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  655,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                    80,500
<INVENTORY>                                    295,511
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,396,719
<PP&E>                                         345,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                 222,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,519,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          317,379
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,331
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,158,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,519,197
<SALES>                                      4,393,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,393,068
<CGS>                                        3,622,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,622,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (467,173)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (467,173)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (467,173)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.12)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         507,893
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 55,597,566
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      16,404,370
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        16,265,523
<LOANS>                                    120,365,181
<ALLOWANCE>                                    560,202
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             200,238,391
<DEPOSITS>                                 138,683,101
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,700,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,664,951
<LONG-TERM>                                 30,926,565
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,263,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             200,238,391
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,028,568
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,885,250
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               127,070
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,040,888
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,951,612
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,839,665
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,201,223
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   73,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              78,403
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,943,485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,564,647
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,033,647
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,033,647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.16
<LOANS-NON>                                    306,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   342,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               487,202
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              560,202
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           560,202
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        234,752
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8031

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KARRIEM WALI MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Charles William

Cannon,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-8048

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KARRIEM WALI MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Charles William

Cannon,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-79-

134-M, CR-79-151-M, CA-01-3341-MJG)
2

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 6, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karriem Wali Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Karriem W. Muhammad appeals the

district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions,

which the court properly construed as motions filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). See United States v. Rich, 141

F.3d 550, 551-52 (5th Cir. 1998). Because this court has not

granted Muhammad authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion,

see 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001), the district court

properly dismissed his Rule 60(b) motions as successive § 2255

motions. See Rich, 141 F.3d at 553. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss these appeals. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1
 Form of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between
SouthFirst Bank and Sandra H. Stephens




---



##### 



SOUTHFIRST BANK
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
  (Sandra H. Stephens)
 st
    Employment
 Base Compensation
 Performance Bonus
 Participation in Retirement, Medical and Other Plans
 1




---



##### 



Employee Benefits; Expenses
 Term
 Loyalty; Full Time and Attention
   Standards
 Vacation and Sick Leave
 2




---



##### 



Termination and Termination Pay
 Death
 Disability
 For Cause
 3




---



##### 



Without Cause
 Voluntary Termination by Employee
 No Mitigation
 4




---



##### 



Change in Control
   5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



Requirements of Applicable Regulations of OTS
          7




---



##### 



Successors and Assigns
   Alternative Dispute Resolution
      8




---



##### 



Amendments
 Applicable Law
 Severability
 Entire Agreement
 
 9




---



##### 



ATTEST:
    
    
    
    SOUTHFIRST BANKBY:Secretary
    
    
    
    
    
    Allen G. McMillan IIIChairman of the Board of DirectorsWITNESS:Sandra H. Stephens (Employee)
 10
No. 36—2306.

#### L. J. Hiltz v. O. M. Wells.

Judgment by confession was entered in the court below in favor of defendant in error and against plaint iff in error on a judgment note for $273.0 5. A motion was entered to set aside the judgment? and an affidavit in support of the motion was made by plaintiff in error. The court is unable to see from the facts set out in the affidavit that plaintiff in error has any valid defense to the note, and the motion to set aside the judgment was properly overruled.

Judge below, Bollin S. Williamson.

Attorneys, for plaintiff in error, Mr. GG. Bellows ;

for defendant in error, Mr. John B. Parker.

Opinion filed April 28, 1886.

Opinion Per Curiam.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkona,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB  for the  quarterly  period  ended  December  31,  2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Leland
H. Boardman,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.,  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Leland H. Boardman
----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment), Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of removal of a company from the 2023 Section 1260H List of Chinese Military Companies Operating in the United States.

# SUMMARY:

                            The Deputy Secretary of Defense has decided to delist the entity listed in the                             **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                             section of this notice from the list of “Chinese military companies” in accordance with the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, without prejudice to relisting the company on additional or supplementary grounds.                        

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Devante Brown (GIES), (703) 695-8545.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        Section 1260H of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Pub. L. 116-283) requires the Secretary of Defense to list “Chinese military companies” that meet the statutory criteria annually until December 31, 2030. Paragraph (b)(2) of this section requires the Secretary of Defense to publish the unclassified portion of such list in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

The Deputy Secretary of Defense has decided to delist the following entity from the list of “Chinese military companies” in accordance with section 1260H, without prejudice to relisting the entity on additional or supplementary grounds: 

Hesai Technology Co., Ltd. (Hesai)

Dated: October 24, 2024.

Aaron T. Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2024-25168 Filed 10-28-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P