alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. D. C. Haworth, Appellant.

Appeal: record: no judgment shown.

*Appeal from Polk District Court.*— Hon. Marcus Kavanagh, Jr., Judge.

Friday, December 18, 1891.

Indictment for robbery. A verdict of guilty, and the defendant *appealed.*

Dismissed,

*713
      *McHenry, Jones $• McHenry,*for appellant.

*John 7. Stone,*Attorney General, and *Xhos. A. Cheshire,*for the state.

Granger, J.

We are without jurisdiction to determine the question presented in the ease. The defendant was, hy an order of this court, permitted to present his abstract of record in type-writing. An abstract is on file, but it nowhere shows that a judgment has been entered in the case, and no appeal can be taken in a criminal case until after a judgment has been rendered. Code, section 4522. The fact is jurisdictional, and must affirmatively appear. *State v. Wheeler,*65 Iowa, 619. See, also, *State v. Briggs,*73 Iowa, 456. The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of Tiger  Telematics,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period ended  November 31, 2003,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on his knowledge and belief: 1) the
Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


/S/ Michael W. Carrender
------------------------------------
Michael W. Carrender, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer

March 25, 2005
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07

- 24

- 00154

- CR

BRIAN TODD WEST , A PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 242nd District Court

Castro County, Texas Trial Court No
. B4311

- 2307 , Honorable Kregg Hukill , Presiding



### July 12 , 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant , Brian Todd West, appeal s his conviction for manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance 1 and sentence to twelve years of conf inement

. The clerk’s record was originally due May 23, 2024, but was not filed

. By letter of June 6, 2024 , we notified the trial court clerk that the record was overdue and directed her to advise this Court of the status of the record by June 17 . To date, the clerk has neither filed the record nor sought an extension of time to do so.

1 See T EX

. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN . § 481.112.2

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 35.3(c) ( “ The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. ” ); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring appellate courts to “ make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties ’ rights ” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand, the trial court shall determine the following:
( 1 ) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the clerk’ s record; ( 2 ) why the clerk has not completed the necessary tasks; ( 3 ) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those tasks; and (4) whether the clerk can complete the tasks within the time the trial court fin ds reasonable. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental clerk ’ s record and cause that record to be filed with this C ourt by September 10 , 2024

.
Should the clerk file the record on or before August 12 , 202 4 , s he is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
Do not publish.
EXCLUSIVE ARTIST RECORDING AGREEMENT



            AGREEMENT made this 6th day of January, 2004 by and between SKREEM
ENTERTAINMENT CORP., a Nevada Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "The
Record Company"), and Patrick Williams, individually, (hereinafter referred to
as "The Artist").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

            In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein
contained, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     1. ENGAGEMENT: During the term of this agreement, The Record Company hereby
engages The Artist to a first rights holding period during which time The Record
Company  shall prepare and present a recording  agreement to The Artist.  During
this holding period The Artist agrees not to enter into any other agreement with
any other company or individual that would conflict with The Artist's ability to
enter into a full and binding recording,  management,  and/or licensing contract
with The Record Company.

     2. TERRITORY: The territory for this agreement shall be worldwide.

     3. TERM: 30 days

          (a) The term of this  agreement  will  commence on the date hereof and
     shall continue pursuant to the conditions herein until the date thirty (30)
     days after the date of the signing of this agreement.

          (b)  Additionally,  The Artist  grants to The Record  Company  one (1)
     separate  option to extend  the term of this  Agreement  for an  additional
     Holding  Period  ("Option   Period")  on  the  same  terms  and  conditions
     applicable to the Initial Contract Period.

     2. Should The Record  Company  decide during the term of this agreement not
to present  The Artist with an  exclusive  recording  agreement  it may do so by
notifying  The Artist in writing  no later than the end of the  "Option  Period"
referred to in #3 (b) above.

     3.  ATTORNEY'S  FEES: In the event that legal action  becomes  necessary to
enforce any provision of this agreement, the prevailing party in any such action
shall be entitled to recover all legal costs and expenses,  including reasonable
attorney's fees.


     4.  ENTIRE  AGREEMENT:  This  agreement  constitutes  the entire  agreement
between  The Record  Company  and The Artist  and cannot be changed  orally.  No
alteration,  amendment or modification thereof shall be binding unless signed in
writing by The Record Company and The Artist.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have signed this  agreement as of the day
and year above set forth.

Very Truly Yours,

SKREEM ENTERTAINMENT CORP.                 Witness (As to The Record Company):


--------------------------                 ----------------------------
By: ______________________________
As Its:____________________________



AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:                          Witness (As to The Artist)


---------------------------------               ---------------------------
Patrick Williams
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

       As of and for the year ended March 31, 1999,  pursuant to Section 8.16 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,  the undersigned on behalf of Centex Credit
Corporation  has performed the reviews of the activities of the Servicer  during
such preceding  fiscal year and of  performance  under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, for Centex Home Equity Loan Trust 1998-4 under my supervision.

       To the best of my  kmowledge,  based on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
fulfilled all obligations  under the Polling  and  Servicing  Agreement for file
fiscal year above referenced.

Anthony H. Barone
President
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report ofSterling Oil and Gas Company(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period end ofNovember 30, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Timothy Barritt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 9th day of January, 2009.                                                                                                                 
|   

TIMOTHY BARRITTTimothy BarrittPresident and Chief Executive Officer





















---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    State or Other
                                                    Jurisdiction of        Percentage
Parent                                              Incorporation          Ownership
------                                              -------------          ---------
<S>                                                 <C>                    <C>
CFS Bancshares, Inc.                                Delaware               N/A


Subsidiary (1)
----------

Citizens Federal Savings Bank                       United States          100%


Subsidiaries of Citizens Federal Savings Bank (1)
---------------------------------------------

Citizens Service Corporation                        Alabama                100%
</TABLE>

_________________
(1) The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in
    the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report to
    Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charlie Jones, Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 678]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Barrett, J.), rendered on or about June 11, 2002, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is *276granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOSEPH M. MASSI, SR.,

Petitioner

v.

CITY OF CHESTER AGGREGATED

PENSION BOARD AND CITY OF

CHESTER,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 528 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16 th day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) May a municipal employer infringe upon the vested right of a city employee by imposing restrictions not specifically contained in its disability ordinance or its agreed

- upon collective bargaining agreement?

(2) May a police officer rely upon the terms of a collective bargaining agreement which sets forth no deadlines for claiming a disability pension in making such application after his technical date of retirement?

(3) Absent language to the contrary, does a police officer vest in entitlement to a disability pension on the date of his injury, and, absent language to the contrary, should the time of confirmation of the disability, and not the date of application, be determinative of a disability pension eligibility?

(4) Does a police officer who has retired forfeit the ability to seek the protection of his collective bargaining agreement, and cease to be considered as a police officer once his retirement has taken effect? M.D. Appeal Dkt. 38 MAP 2019
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
  CERTIFICATION
    OF
 BRIAN A. GOEBEL, VICE PRESIDENT, CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND
    ACTING CHIEF
    FINANCIAL OFFICER, (PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
    FINANCIAL
    OFFICER)
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
    caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
    designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
    regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
    preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and  (d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
    affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.    (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and  (b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.
S. 449

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the personal representative

of the estate of Fred Steffens of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land comprising the Steffens family property.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF STEFFENS FAMILY PROPERTY.

(a) CONVEYANCE.—Subject to subsection (b) and valid existing

rights, the Secretary of the Interior shall issue, without consideration, a quitclaim deed to Marie Wambeke of Big Horn County,

Wyoming, the personal representative of the estate of Fred Steffens,

to the land described in subsection (c).

(b) RESERVATION OF MINERALS.—All minerals underlying the

land described in subsection (c) are reserved to the United States.

(c) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land described in this subsection

is the parcel comprising approximately 80 acres and known as

‘‘Farm Unit C’’ in the E1⁄2NW1⁄4 of Section 27 in Township 57

North, Range 97 West, 6th Principal Meridian, Wyoming.

(d) REVOCATION OF WITHDRAWAL.—The withdrawal for the Shoshone Reclamation Project made by the Bureau of Reclamation

under Secretarial Order dated October 21, 1913, is revoked with

respect to the land described in subsection (c).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1140** 

JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR
. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JND HANDYMAN SERVICE.ORG; JEROME JULIUS BROWN, JR. , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 03110

- ELH )

Submitted : June 20, 2013 Decided: July 15, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. seeks to ap peal the district court’s order dismis sing his civil complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bow les v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court’s ord er was entered on the docket on November 1, 2012. Th e notice of appeal was filed on January 25, 2013. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(d). Because Brown failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael C. French, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
       Company.

/s/ Michael C. French

Michael C. French
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and will be retained by
Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 24, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 04-51386

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

ROBBIE WOOSLEY

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, Austin

---------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

IT IS ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

the sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed

motion to remand the case to the United States District Court for

the Western District of Texas, Austin Division for resentencing

is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s alternative
2

unopposed motion for an extension of time to file the Appellee’s

brief fourteen (14) days from the Court’s denial of the

Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is DENIED AS MOOT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     1876
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              1244
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                               58085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          65820
<PP&E>                                                    47018
<DEPRECIATION>                                            17414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           103342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     17532
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                     91
<OTHER-SE>                                                66529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             103342
<SALES>                                                   48018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          48018
<CGS>                                                     26633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             26633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          20755
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             163
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 61
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         102
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .01
        

</TABLE>