alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from  InterJet  Net  Corporation   March  31,  1998  financial
                  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                      0000925739
<NAME>                              InterJet Net Corpoation

       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                                                        443,761
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 39,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   210,511
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              1,694,539
<PP&E>                                                        1,103,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                                136,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                3,446,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         433,056
<BONDS>                                                       44,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      13,504
<OTHER-SE>                                                    2,955,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  3,446,998
<SALES>                                                       179,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              180,931
<CGS>                                                         97,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 864,942
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (781,281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (781,281)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (781,281)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.06)
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 31, 2018

No. 04-18-00438-CV

SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP,

Appellant

v.

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO., Atrium Circle, GP, Atrium Winn, LLC, Atrium Kavoian, 

LLC Copperfield Square, Copperfield Winn, LLC, Copperfield Kavoian, LLC, Imperial Airport, 

Imperial Winn, LLC, Imperial Kavoian, LLC, Crystal Springs Partners, LLC, Commerce Office 

Park – One LP, and Universal Square, LP,

Appellees

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-00676

The Honorable Peter Sakai, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant Shopoff Advisors, L.P. has filed a reply brief and certifies that the reply brief

“complies with the type-volume limitations of” the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because 

it “contains 8,500 words, excluding the parts of the [brief] exempted by Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.4(i)(1).” However, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(2)(C) provides that the 

maximum length of a reply brief in an appellate court is “7,500 words if computer-generated.”

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(C). Thus, appellant has certified that its reply brief exceeds the 

maximum length allowed. 

If a document fails to conform with Rule 9.4, this Court “may strike the document or 

identify the error and permit the party to resubmit the document in a conforming format by a 

specified deadline.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(k). 

We, therefore, ORDER Appellant Shopoff Advisors, L.P. to file an amended reply brief 

within fifteen days from the date of this order. If the amended brief does not correct the 

violations, we will strike the reply brief and prohibit appellant from filing another. See id. 
It is so ORDERED on October 31, 2018.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
---

M I L L A R W E S T E R N F O R E S T P R O D U C T S L T D .

T e l : 7 8 0 . 4 8 6 . 8 2 0
0           F a x : 7 8 0 . 4
8 6 . 8 2 8 2

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Craig Armstrong, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2016, (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                 

Dated: March 7, 2017

| | /s/ J.
      Craig Armstrong         
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | J. Craig Armstrong                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer

1 6 6 4 0  1 1 1 A v e n u e , E d m o n t o n , A l b e r t a
, C a n a d a T 5 M 2 S 5

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON 
PAGES 2 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          34,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     74,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,123
<PP&E>                                         703,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                (33,987)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,463,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          235,471
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           228
<OTHER-SE>                                     484,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,463,553
<SALES>                                        452,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               452,389
<CGS>                                          387,441
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  387,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,899
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,434
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Kevin  Monson,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report of  Ecological  Services,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period
ended June 30, 2001 fully complies  within the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
such Form 10-QSB  fairly  represents  in all  material  respects  the  financial
condition and results of operations of Ecological Services, Inc.


                                        By:
                                           ----------------------------
                                        Name: Kevin Monson
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer


I,  Kevin  Monson,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report of  Ecological  Services,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period
ended June 30, 2001 fully complies  within the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
such Form 10-QSB  fairly  represents  in all  material  respects  the  financial
condition and results of operations of Ecological Services, Inc.



                                          By:
                                             --------------------------
                                          Name: Kevin Monson
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report” ), I, Hyung Soon Lee,
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 (1)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Hyung Soon
Lee
 Hyung
Soon Lee
 Principal
Executive Officer
 Principal
Financial Officer
 Date:
August 14, 2008
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT  10.5

                                                       ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 2001


                                  AMENDMENT OF
                           COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION
                      1985 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN


RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 6 of the Compaq Computer Corporation 1985
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), the Plan is amended effective as
of September 4, 2001, with respect to Options granted prior to September 1,
2001, as follows:


5.       Section 5(e) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following
         proviso to the first sentence of Section 5(e)(i):

                           ; provided, however that if, within one year
                           following an occurrence of a Change in Control, the
                           Optionee's employment is terminated in a Qualifying
                           Termination (as defined in subparagraph (v) below),
                           the Optionee shall have the right to exercise all
                           outstanding Options until the earlier of (1) the
                           third anniversary of such termination of employment
                           or (2) the date such Options would have expired had
                           it not been for such termination of employment. For
                           purposes of applying the immediately preceding
                           proviso with respect to treatment of Options in the
                           event of a Qualifying Termination, the definition of
                           a Change in Control set forth in Section 9.03 shall
                           be revised by substituting the phrase "a merger or
                           consolidation of the Company with any other
                           corporation is consummated" for the phrase "the
                           stockholders of the Company approve a merger or
                           consolidation of the Company with any other
                           corporation" in clause (iii) of said Section 9.03.

6.       Section 5(e)(v) is hereby amended by adding the following after the
         last sentence thereof:

                           For purposes of subparagraph (i) above, the term
                           "Qualifying Termination" shall have the meaning
                           ascribed to such term in the Optionee's individual
                           employment or severance agreement with the Company or
                           its Subsidiaries. If the Optionee is not a party to
                           an individual employment or severance agreement with
                           the Company or its Subsidiaries, the term "Qualifying
                           Termination" shall have the meaning ascribed to the
                           term "Qualified Termination" in the Compaq Computer
                           Corporation employee severance plan in which such
                           Optionee is eligible to participate.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



                                             December 31,    December 31,
                                                    1999            1998
                                             -----------     -----------
Net income (loss) in                             $(1,089)        $    64
thousands
                                                 =======         =======
Weighted average common                           11,641          11,500
shares outstanding
Additional shares for options                          _               _
and warrants outstanding
under treasury-stock method
                                                 -------         -------
                                                  11,641          11,500
                                                 =======         =======
                                                 $ ( .09)        $   .01
                                                 =======         =======
### Number of gasoline-powered vehicles in the fleet in calendar year 2015

Light-duty vehicles Light-duty trucks Reverse MY population MY population Total Cumulative Cumulative % 1985 424,187 1985 204,129 628,316 628,316 1986 336,346 1986 302,141 638,487 1,266,803 99.7% 1987 414,282 1987 314,655 728,937 1,995,741 99.4% 1988 508,944 1988 415,951 924,895 2,920,636 99.1% 1989 654,767 1989 490,567 1,145,334 4,065,970 98.6% 1990 796,921 1990 481,532 1,278,453 5,344,422 98.1% 1991 953,702 1991 538,293 1,491,995 6,836,417 97.5% 1992 1,142,730 1992 637,020 1,779,750 8,616,167 96.8% 1993 1,387,360 1993 845,816 2,233,176 10,849,343 96.0% 1994 1,652,240 1994 1,190,995 2,843,235 13,692,578 94.9% 1995 2,155,520 1995 1,403,082 3,558,602 17,251,180 93.6% 1996 2,162,100 1996 1,453,785 3,615,885 20,867,065 92.0% 1997 2,697,800 19972,008,042 4,705,842 25,572,907 90.3% 1998 2,986,410 19982,343,685 5,330,095 30,903,002 88.1% 1999 3,728,010 19992,900,004 6,628,014 37,531,016 85.6% 2000 4,810,390 20003,420,712 8,231,102 45,762,118 82.5% 2001 4,994,090 20013,742,388 8,736,478 54,498,596 78.7% 2002 5,628,610 20024,254,705 9,883,315 64,381,911 74.6% 2003 5,929,110 20034,490,434 10,419,544 74,801,455 70.0% 2004 5,820,200 20045,095,310 10,915,510 85,716,965 65.1% 2005 6,315,740 20055,185,780 11,501,520 97,218,485 60.0% 2006 6,382,430 20065,124,950 11,507,380 108,725,865 54.7% 2007 6,923,730 20074,814,247 11,737,977 120,463,842 49.3% 2008 6,306,980 20084,747,725 11,054,705 131,518,547 43.8% 2009 5,039,130 20092,636,019 7,675,149 139,193,696 38.7% 2010 5,507,730 20103,462,472 8,970,202 148,163,898 35.1% 2011 4,815,580 20113,534,306 8,349,886 156,513,784 30.9% 2012 7,659,600 20125,257,272 12,916,872 169,430,656 27.0% 2013 8,290,360 20136,016,150 14,306,510 183,737,166 21.0% 2014 8,675,410 20146,411,270 15,086,680 198,823,846 14.3% 2015 8,828,700 20156,840,610 15,669,310 214,493,156 7.3%
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20174

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ULYSSES LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR-H-95-149-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1996

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ulysses Lopez appeals his sentence following his conviction

for conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, in violation of 18

U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1341. Lopez asserts that the district court

erred by failing to reduce his offense level based on his

acceptance of responsibility. We have reviewed the record and

the briefs of the parties and hold that the district court’s

finding was not clearly erroneous that the reduction was
No. 96-20174

- 2 -

unwarranted. See United States v. Watson, 988 F.2d 544, 551 (5th

Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1048 (1994).

AFFIRMED.
#### BENJAMIN GRICE *vs.*SARAH WRIGHT.

Where it appears that there are trees fit for making turpentine, which are not fit for tun timber, an exception of tun timber from a lease declaring the general purpose to be for making turpentine, is not inconsistent with the granting part of the lease.

ActioN of trespass quaee olausuM eeegit, tried before his Honor Judge Bailey, at Spring Term, 1855, of Eobeson Superior Court.

*185Erom a general lease of the defendant’s lands to one James Grice, for the purpose of *making and distilling turpentine,*there was a reservation to herself (deft.) of the privilege of using the *fan timber.*The plaintiff entered under James Grice, and afterwards the defendant entered and cut *tun*timber which was also good for making turpentine; indeed it appears that all pine trees fit for timber are also fit for turpentine ; but there are trees fit for making turpentine which are not so for tun timber.

It was insisted by the plaintiff that this reservation of the privilege of using tun timber was inconsistent with, and repugnant to, the granting part of the lease, and as such, was void.

His Honor charged the jury that the exception was not repugnant to the granting portion, and that the exception was good, and that if they believed the defendant cut such trees only as were suitable for timber, she had a right to do so, and the plaintiff could not recover. To which instruction the plaintiff excepted.

Yerdictfor the defendant. Judgment and appeal to this Court.

*Banks*and *Shepherd,*for plaintiff.

*Strange,*for defendant.

Battle, J.

*We*cannot perceive any reason for dpubting the correctness of the opinion expressed by his Honor in the court below. The exception of the trees fit for tun timber did not embrace all the trees fit for turpentine, and, therefore, was not repugnant to the grant in the lease under which the plaintiff claimed. The cases of *Robinson*v. *Gee,*4 Ire. Rep. 186, and *Whitted*v. *Smith, ante*36, are both cases in which the deeds contained exceptions as much, if not more, liable to objection than this, and yet no doubt was expressed as to their sufficiency, and the only questions raised on them were as to their extent: An exception necessarily excludes from a grant a part of the whole of what would otherwise be contained in it, and that is all the effect it has in this case.

Pee Oujbiam. Judgment affirmed.
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.15    
  


 
 

PROMISSORY NOTE    
  



	Amount $50,000.00	 	July 19, 2001





    For
value received, the undersigned, GeoPetro Resources Company ("Payor"), hereby promises to pay on demand to Stuart J. Doshi ("Holder") the principal sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars
($50,000.00) with interest from July 19, 2001 at a rate of eight percent (8%) per annum, payable upon repayment of the loan. 



	Signed by:
 GeoPetro Resources Company	 	 
	

 J. Chris Steinhauser

Chief Financial Officer	
 	

 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.15


PROMISSORY NOTE
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32

(a)   Certification by President of Annual Report

                         CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

I, Robert B. Kay, President of Key Components, LLC and Key Components Finance
Corp. (collectively, the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

       (1)    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
              December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

       (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Date: March 10, 2004


/s/ Robert B. Kay
Robert B. Kay
President



<PAGE>


(b)   Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Annual Report

                         CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

I, Keith A. McGowan, Chief Financial Officer of Key Components, LLC and Key
Components Finance Corp. (collectively, the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

       (1)    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
              December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

       (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Date: March 10, 2004

/s/ Keith A. McGowan
Keith A. McGowan
Chief Financial Officer