alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the  Quarter  Ended  August 31, 2009 (the  "Report")  by
Progressive  Training,  Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned  hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




October 15, 2009                             By:     /s/ Buddy Young
                                                     -----------------
                                                     Buddy Young
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


                                       21
<pre>

EXHIBIT 10.13  2000 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF PATRICIA SPIGNO

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective the 27th day of
March 2000, by and between Conectisys, Inc., a Colorado corporation
("CONECTISYS"), ("Employer"), and Patricia A. Spigno ("Employee").

The following amendments to the language of the terms noted are hereby amended
as follows:

The amendments are effective March 27, 2000:

I.  Employment and term. Employer hereby employs Employee and Employee hereby
accepts employment from Employer to perform the duties set forth below, for a
term of Five (5) years ending April 1, 2005.

II. Compensation.  Employee shall have an option to purchase up to 500,000
shares of Conectisys Corporation restricted stock under rule 144, at a cost of
$.38 per share. This option shall remain open/exercisable until December 31,
2002. Said Option is renewable by Ms. Spigno for an additional three (3) years.
This is the total extent and number of options granted under this Employment
Agreement and this amendment shall supercede all previous amendments as it
pertains to stock options.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed as of the day and year first above written.


Employee:___________________________________
         Patricia A. Spigno


Employer:___________________________________
         Lawrence Muirhead
         Conectisys Corp.
         Chief Technical Officer


Employer:___________________________________
         Robert A. Spigno
         Conectisys Corp.
         President & CEO
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of R.H. Donnelley
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
             expressed in the Report.

/s/ David C. Swanson

David C. Swanson
Chief Executive Officer
March 18, 2003
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 404

To prohibit the return of veterans memorial objects to foreign nations without

specific authorization in law.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. THOMAS (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mr. HELMS, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr.

COVERDELL, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. SMITH of New

Hampshire, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. NICKLES, and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To prohibit the return of veterans memorial objects to

foreign nations without specific authorization in law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON THE RETURN OF VETERANS

4 MEMORIAL OBJECTS TO FOREIGN NATIONS

5 WITHOUT SPECIFIC AUTHORIZATION IN LAW.

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding section 2572 of

7 title 10, United States Code, or any other provision of law,

8 the President may not transfer a veterans memorial object

9 to a foreign country or entity controlled by a foreign gov-
2

S 404 IS

1 ernment, or otherwise transfer or convey such object to

2 a person or entity for purposes of the ultimate transfer

3 or conveyance of such object to a foreign country or entity

4 controlled by a foreign government, unless specifically au5 thorized by law.

6 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

7 (1) ENTITY CONTROLLED BY A FOREIGN GOV8 ERNMENT.—The term ‘‘entity controlled by a for9 eign government’’ has the meaning given that term

10 in section 2536(c)(1) of title 10, United States

11 Code.

12 (2) VETERANS MEMORIAL OBJECT.—The term

13 ‘‘veterans memorial object’’ means any object, in14 cluding a physical structure or portion thereof,

15 that—

16 (A) is located at a cemetery of the Na17 tional Cemetery System, war memorial, or mili18 tary installation in the United States;

19 (B) is dedicated to, or otherwise memorial20 izes, the death in combat or combat-related du21 ties of members of the United States Armed

22 Forces; and

23 (C) was brought to the United States from

24 abroad as a memorial of combat abroad.

Æ
9/17/13 Toxic Chemicals Associated with this Sector | Exchange.Regulations.gov

exchange.regulations.gov/topic/trisectorsrule/discussion/tri-phosphate-mining-chemicals#comment-858 1/1

Are there specific TRI-listed toxic chemicals

(/sites/default/files/doc_files/TRI%20Chemical%20List%20Reporting%20Year%202010.pdf) for which you believe that

the addition of this sector would provide information of value to communities? Note that

radionuclides are not included on the TRI chemical list

(/sites/default/files/doc_files/TRI%20Chemical%20List%20Reporting%20Year%202010.pdf) .

Re: Toxic Chemicals Associated with this Sector

(/topic/trisectorsrule/discussion/tri-phosphate-mining-chemicals#comment-858)

Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:56am — bgestring

Earthworks urges the EPA to add phosphate mining to the TRI sector due to the significant

releases of selenium to water and land associated with this industry. Phosphate mines in Idaho

are the source of selenium contamination to surface and groundwater in the region, affecting

people who live, work and recreate in the area. Selenium pollution from Idaho phosphate mines

has resulted in extensive harm to livestock, with multiple examples of cattle and sheep deaths.

It's also caused harm to fish and wildlife. This represents a threat to public health, and it's vital

that the public have access to information about releases of selenium in the environment around

their community.

OMB Control No. 2025-0008

Username: * Password: * Sign In

Create new profile Request new password
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 24, 2013

NO. 03

- 10

- 00414

- CR

Myron Bishop Head, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the district court’s

judgment s : IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment s

of the district court are in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that t his decision be certified

below for observance.
1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LEONARDO RAMIREZ

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 097

- C R

Appeal from the

41 st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 201 70 D0 4632 )

O R D E R

Appellant has filed a fourth motion to file his brief. The Court will not act on the motion

unless it is amended to adequately explains in detail the need for the extraordinary relief that he

seeks.

Appellant was found guilty of Driving While Intoxicated, Third Offense, on January 29,

2019. He is currently incarcerated. He filed a notice of appeal on April 12, 2019. By August 2,

2019 both the Clerk’s Record and the Reporter’s Records were filed with this Court. His brief was

accordingly due on September 1, 2019. Appellant filed three extensions of time and has been

granted three thirty

- day extension of time, making his brief due on November 30, 2019. With the

last extension, the Court stated t hat no further extensions would be considered by the Court.

Any motion to extend the time to file a brief must state “the facts relied on to reasonably

explain the need for an extension[.]” T EX .R.A PP .P. 10.5(b)(1)(C). The first three of Appell ant’s

motions contained the identical reason justifying the extension:

Counsel, as a sole practitioner, has had an extraordinary heavy jury trial and

appellate briefing schedule, jury trial scheduled during this briefing timeline, all

requiring extensive research and preparation time.

Attorney for appellant is currently involved in several complex criminal matters

that require extensive research, preparation of witnesses, and evidence for2

deposition and trial, set before the district courts of Texas, alon g with counsel's

responsibilities on other urgent client matters.

Those stated reasons refer to a “heavy jury trial and appellate briefing schedule” without any

specific mention of the cases referred to. The same reasons reference work on “several comple x criminal matters” without any specific mention of the matters at issue. And in the face of this

Court’s order that no further extensions would be considered, Appellant’s fourth motion contains

the exact same language. The cited reasons do not state the facts relied on to justify the

extraordinary relief sought. Stated otherwise, use of boilerplate and non

- specific reasons for an

extension are inadequate to justify a fourth extension of time to file a brief.

Appellant may amend his motion to provide a specific factual basis for the extraordinary

relief sought to this Court on or before December 6, 2019

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 7 th day of November , 201 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the year December 31, 2005 of the Company
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/ COREY M. HOROWITZ
---------------------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN
APRIL 11, 2006
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 3560

_____________________________ C HARLES D. J ENNINGS ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

– Original Jurisdiction.

January 17, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. In light of the Special Master ’ s Report and Recommendation of November 6, 2023, the petition for belated appeal is DENIED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , W INOKUR , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Charles D. Jennings, pro se, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent

.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.12

ADDENDUM #2 TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

International Microcomputer Software, Inc. and ArtToday.com, Inc.
(hereinafter collectively "IMSI") and Imageline, Inc., George P.
Riddick, III, and any assignees (hereinafter collectively "Imageline")
hereby agree to amend the Settlement Agreement dated July 27, 2001 and
amended September 24, 2001 as follows:

Imageline and IMSI hereby agree that in the event IMSI defaults on any payments
pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and IMSI does not cure the default within
30 days of notice from Imageline; then interest on the remaining amounts due
shall begin to accrue at the rate of 12% per annum and be payable to Imageline
until such default is cured. In addition, a one-time penalty of 5% of the
remaining amounts due at the time of default shall be due to Imageline within
fifteen (15) business days of any uncured default.

IMSI further agrees to begin the monthly payments to Imageline on Friday,
October 5, 2001 by wire transfer to an account designated by Imageline, and to
continue to make monthly payments on or before the 5th of each month thereafter.
The effective date of the settlement with Imageline shall be 9/30/01.

All other terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement shall remain as
originally written and are hereby confirmed.

Dated: 10\5\01                          Dated:  10\5\01
       ------------------------------           --------------------------------

By:    /s/ GORDON LANDIS                By:     /s/ GEORGE P. RIDDICK III
       ------------------------------           --------------------------------
       IMSI                                     Imageline


                                      145
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,135
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,022
<PP&E>                                      31,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       45,419
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                              1,000,000
<COMMON>                                   405,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,406
<SALES>                                     37,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,013
<CGS>                                        9,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            67,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (38,091)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (38,091)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew Brooks, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cardo Medical, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: November 14, 2008 | /s/ ANDREW  A. BROOKS
                      Andrew A. BrooksChief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
EXHIBIT 32.1










CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:





The Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year December 31, 2009 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.












/s/ Corey M. HorowitzChief Executive Officer and ChairmanApril 8, 2010










A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,350
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,350
<PP&E>                                         222
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,750
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                              1,000,000
<COMMON>                                   405,000
<OTHER-SE>                             (50,100,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,922
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,556
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,556)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,556)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
#### Jones, Appellant, vs. Couture and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Lehner & Lehner*of Princeton.

For the respondents: *Dougherty, Arnold & Kivett*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.