alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                                  CMGI, INC.

                    AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                                        August 3, 2001

Mr. David S. Wetherell
CMGI, Inc.
100 Brickstone Square
Andover, MA 01810

Dear Dave:

     This Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement amends the Employment
Agreement between you and CMGI, Inc. (the "Company"), dated as of November 9,
1993, as amended (the "Employment Agreement").  In consideration of the premises
herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, you and the Company
agree as follows:

     1.   Amendment of Employment Agreement.  Section 3A of the Employment
          ---------------------------------
Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with following which is
effective as of August 1, 2001:

     "3A. Base Salary.  As compensation for your services, the Company shall pay
          -----------
to you a Base Salary at the annual rate of $1.00 plus such amounts as are
determined by the Board (or the Human Resources and Compensation Committee
thereof) as necessary to cover your Medicare, auto lease, medical, dental,
vision and similar deductions, plus such additional amounts as may be determined
from time to time by the Board (or the Human Resources and Compensation
Committee thereof) in its sole discretion and designated as increases in Base
Salary. Any such increase in Base Salary may not be subsequently reduced or
eliminated without your consent, except as part of a general reduction of
executive salaries."

     2.   Continuing Effect of Employment Agreement.  Except as amended hereby,
          -----------------------------------------
the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

                                   * * * * *
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, you and the Company have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the date set forth above.

                                                       CMGI, INC.


                                                       By: /s/ Jeffrey Yanagi
                                                           ------------------
                                                       Name: Jeffrey Yanagi
                                                       Title: EVP HR

                                                       ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


                                                       /s/ David S. Wetherell
                                                       ----------------------
                                                       David S. Wetherell
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 DISCLOSURE IN THE REGISTRANT'S ANNUAL REPORT  I, Gary C. Granoff, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Ameritrans Capital Corporation, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-k of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "report");  2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the report (evaluation date); and  (c) Presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the evaluation date.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and  6. I have indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weakness.  Dated: September 29, 2008   /s/ Gary C. Granoff GARY C. GRANOFF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a)


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, J.
Michael Pearson, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orion Marine Group,
Inc.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) 
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) 
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) 
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) 
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) 
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






By:
            /s/
      J. Michael PearsonNovember
      6, 2008
            J.
      Michael PearsonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lucas Educational Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Kevin B.
Halter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Kevin B. Halter
-------------------
Kevin B. Halter
Chief Executive Officer

August 7, 2002
<Page>

June 2, 2000

Mark K. Kleinman
6922 Flintcove
Dallas, TX  75287

Dear Mark:

Inet Technologies, Inc. is pleased to extend to you an offer for the position
of Vice President Legal reporting to William Mina, Sr. Vice President,
Administration & Legal Affairs.  Our offer to you is as follows:

-   Base salary of $170,000, payable semi-monthly
-   Participation in the Management Incentive Bonus Program at 30% of base
    salary (contingent upon achievement of company and personal objectives)

Effective the first day of employment with Inet, you will be granted an
option to purchase 30,000 shares of Inet's Common Stock under Inet's 1998
Stock Incentive Plan.  The exercise price of your option will be the closing
selling price of Inet's Common Stock on that date.  Your option will be
exercisable for twenty-five percent (25%) of the option shares, upon your
completion of each of the four (4) years of service with Inet, measured from
the option grant date.  The option grant and associated pricing are subject
to Board approval.

-   If Inet terminates your employment for any reason other than for cause
    during the first year of employment, Inet will pay up to one year's salary.
-   If your employment is actually or constructively (through a change in work
    location outside the Dallas metroplex or a material reduction in
    responsibility or compensation) terminated following a Change in Control
    (as defined in Inet's 1998 Stock Incentive Plan), you will receive a lump
    sum payment equal to 12 months salary.
-   Following a Change in Control (as defined in Inet's 1998 Stock Incentive
    Plan), if your options are not otherwise accelerated by the acquirer, you
    will be allowed two years' accelerated vesting of the unvested option
    shares.
-   For any period of time during which you are unable to perform services for
    Inet because of any dispute with your prior employer and/or the enforcement
    of its non-competition/nondisclosure agreements, you will receive no
    compensation.  In the event that any such period extends beyond sixty (60)
    days, it will constitute immediate grounds for termination for cause, and
    you will be terminated without any further vesting of stock options.

Inet is a high-growth, profitable enterprise that provides quality,
innovative, competitively priced, state-of-the-art telecommunications
products and support.  Inet focuses on complete customer satisfaction and
fosters an environment that encourages employee development.  You will find
your position to be both challenging and rewarding.

Keep in mind that all information pertaining to compensation is confidential.
This offer is contingent upon acceptable results of your background check.
If you have any questions about the offer or the company, please call Glenda
Barrett or me.

Please sign the copy of this letter and return it in the enclosed envelope as
formal acceptance of the offer within three working days from the date of
this letter.  We look forward to hearing from you by June 6, 2000.  If you
need more time to make your decision, please let us know.

Sincerely,



William Mina
Sr. Vice President
Administration & Legal Affairs
Order entered August 16, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00106-CR

SUZANNE BATTLES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MB10-50867-F

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4824-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Kansas (FEMA-4824-DR), dated September 24, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued October 4, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Kansas is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 24, 2024.

Logan, Pawnee, and Wallace Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-24667 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
No. 12—2271.

#### Cornelia J. Chadwick et al. v. Alvina C. McKee.

An action of trespass for breaking and entering the plaintiff’s dwelling house, and also for taking and carrying away divers goods and chattels belonging to the plaintiff. At the trial before the court and a jury, defendants Cornelia J. Chadwick and Loren Chadwick only were convicted, and the plaintiff’s damages were assessed against them at $5,000. For this sum and costs the plaintiff had judgment. The court is of the opinion that the damages are clearly and largely excessive. Host of the damages awarded are manifestly punitive, as it would he difficult, upon any reasonable view of the evidence, to estimate the plaintiff’s actual or compensatory damages at more than one tenth of the sum given .by the jury, and there is very little, if any basis in the evidence for the imposition of punitive damages, at least as against Cornelia J. Chadwick. While in cases of this character, the measure of damage is, to a certain extent, within the discretion of the jury, yet it is the duty of the court to see that the verdict is not oppressive, and that it is the clear and deliberate judgment of the jury, uninfluenced by any improper motives: Lockwood v. Onion, 56 Ill. 512.

Judge below, Joseph E. Gary.

Attorneys, for plaintiffs in error, Hessrs. HcOoy, Pope *&*HoCoy ;

for defendant in error, Hr. W. S. Harbert and Hr. W. P. Black.

Opinion filed March 31, 1886.

Opinion Per Curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of September 30, 1998, and statements of operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         744,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,040,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,820,835
<PP&E>                                           8,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                     270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,960,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,161
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,170
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,790,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,960,086
<SALES>                                         68,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,501
<CGS>                                           43,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,006,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,002,669)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,002,669)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,002,669)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7**  **523**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. RONNIE EARL KNOX , Defendant

- Appell ant
. Appeal from the United States District Court for the We stern District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 3:03

- cr - 00220

- FDW

- 4 )

Submitted : November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Ronnie Earl Knox , Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie Earl Knox appea ls the district court ’ s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence and his motion for reconsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Knox , No. 3:03

- cr - 00220

- FDW

- 4 (W.D.N.C. July 16, 2012 , Aug. 1, 2012 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,183
<PP&E>                                         173,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,766
<BONDS>                                        180,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (60,637)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,205
<SALES>                                        240,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,050
<CGS>                                          202,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  247,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,972)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,972)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,972)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>