alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.3

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                           OF ST. PAUL CAPITAL TRUST I

            The undersigned, the trustees of St. Paul Capital I, desiring to
form a business trust pursuant to Delaware Business Trust Act, 12 Del.
C. Section 3801 ET. SEQ., hereby certify as follow:

            (a)   The name of the business trust being formed hereby (the
"Trust") is "St. Paul Capital Trust I."

            (b) The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which
has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is as follows:

            Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
            c/o J.P. Morgan Chase
            Attn:  Institutional Trust Services
            500 Stanton Christiana Road, Fl 3 / OPS4
            Newark, DE  19713

            (c) This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or more
counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.

            (d) This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of its filing.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the initial
trustees of the Trust, have executed this Certificate of Trust.



                                CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee



                                By:  /s/ John Cashin
                                    -----------------------------
                                      Name: John Cashin
                                     Title: Vice President


                                By:  /s/ Thomas A. Bradley
                                    -----------------------------
                                      Name: Thomas A. Bradley, as Trustee
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rajeev Madhavan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify for the purposes of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



| | (i) |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended April 1, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    RAJEEV MADHAVANRajeev Madhavan Chief Executive OfficerJune 6, 2007




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Form
10-K for the period ending April 1, 2007 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of R.H. Donnelley Inc. as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and DirectorMarch 28, 2007
    
    March 28, 2007
  81
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         636,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 688,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        270,846
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           177
<OTHER-SE>                                     310,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   688,195
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,338
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,906
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,906
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                                DAVID L. HOLMES


October 18, 2001


Mr. Tom Chaffee
Board Member
Homeseekers.com
Reno, NV 89509

        RE: Resignation Homeseekers

Dear Tom:

Please be advised that I am resigning my position as a member of the Board of
Directors of HomeSeekers effective today due to personal reasons.

Sincerely,

/S/ DAVID L. HOLMES

David L. Holmes
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Exultant Medical Diagnostics, P.C., as Assignee of Devon Crawford and Shatara Griffin, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>American Commerce Insurance Company, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Bruno, Gerbino &amp; Soriano, LLP (Mitchell L. Kaufman, Esq.), for appellant.Baker Sanders, LLC, for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (Ignatius L. Muscarella, J.), dated April 17, 2015. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the District Court which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. </p><p>Upon a review of the record, we find that defendant failed to establish that the denial of claim forms, which denied plaintiff's claims on the ground of lack of medical necessity, had been properly and timely mailed. The affidavit of defendant's claims adjuster did not state how defendant obtains the mailing address for the denial of claim forms, so as to ensure that the address is correct, or that the envelopes are affixed with postage (<a href="../2015/2015_03340.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v Infinite Ortho Prods., Inc.</i>, 127 AD3d 1050</a> [2015]; <a href="../2008/2008_04072.htm" target="_blank"><i>St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123</a> [2008]; <a href="../2016/2016_50415.htm" target="_blank"><i>Contemporary Acupuncture, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co.</i>, 51 Misc 3d 132</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 50464[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2016]). Consequently, defendant failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed. </p><p>Marano, P.J., Iannacci and Garguilo, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: April 13, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Automotive, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
A. Barone, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Anthony A. Barone
-----------------------
Anthony A. Barone
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2002
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Humphreys, Huff and Senior Judge Clements

AMERICAN HOSPICE MANAGEMENT

 HOLDINGS, L.L.C. AND AMERICAN

 HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY

MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1851-11-2 PER CURIAM

JANUARY 24, 2012

JULIA ANN PIGGOTT

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(S. Vernon Priddy III; Two Rivers Law Group, P.C., on brief), for 

appellants.

(Vincent L. Robertson, Sr., on brief), for appellee.

American Hospice Management Holdings, L.L.C. (hereinafter referred to as employer) 

appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission ordering the employer to 

authorize surgery requested by Julia Ann Piggott (claimant). Employer contends the commission 

erred by 1) ordering the authorization for the surgery, (2) rejecting employer’s argument that 

claimant failed to prove the surgery was necessary and causally related to her awarded condition 

of “strain-lumbar,” and (3) by “expanding [claimant’s] compensable condition beyond the 

awarded condition . . . .”

We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final 

opinion. See Piggot v. American Hospice Management Holdings, L.L.C., VWC File No. 

232-30-16 (Aug. 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the 

 * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
- 2 -

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50728

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jerrod O’Brian Williams, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:11-CR-255-2

______________________________

Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jerrod O’Brian 

Williams has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Williams has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 10, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50728 Document: 37-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/10/2024
No. 23-50728

2

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2.

Case: 23-50728 Document: 37-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/10/2024
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Stephen Schwartz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge;





(i)
      the
      Annual Report of EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp. on Form 10-K/A for the
      year
      ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





(ii)
      information contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of EVCI Career Colleges
      Holding Corp.







Dated:
                August 10, 2007
            
            /s/Stephen
                SchwartzStephen
                Schwartz
              Chief
                Financial Officer
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-50883

_____________________

DOMINGO MARTINEZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Texas

(D.C. No. A-96-CV-695)

_______________________________________________________

May 4, 2000

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Our question is whether under the evidence, considered in the light most favorable

to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt

that Domingo Valdez Martinez possessed at least 400 grams in aggregate weight of

methamphetamine, including adulterants and dilutants. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S.

307 (1979).
2

The complaint is that the testimony indicates that no more than 260.5 grams of the

methamphetamine was pure and that the additives should not be counted. The answer to

that complaint is that the state produced expert testimony that appellant had more than

400 grams of methamphetamine in final and useable form. The Texas court upheld the

verdict as supported by the evidence. No federal law is implicated and habeas corpus

must be denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### S. GINSBERG v. GEORGE T. LEACH.

*Appeal*— Trial.

The Supreme Court will not consider exceptions arising upon the trial of other issues, when one issue, decisive of the appellant’s right to recover, has been found against him by the jury.

Civil action for damages, commenced before a Justice of the Peace, and tried upon appeal at Fall Term, 1891, of Hyde Superior Court, *Brown, J.,*presiding.

*Mr. G. F. Warren,*for plaintiff.

*Mr. J. H. Small,*for defendant.

ClaRK, J.:

The following issues were submitted to the jurj^:

1. Did the defendant unlawfully commit the trespasses and damages as alleged in the complaint?

2. What damage has the plaintiff sustained?

There weréno exceptions, other than to the charge and the refusal to give a prayer in the words asked. There was but one witness (Bishop) introduced by the plaintiff, and there was no testimony for the defendant. The Court instructed the jury that, if they believed the witness, to answer the first issue, “Yes.” The jury, on their return, responded to this issue, “No.” The Court then asked the jury if they had understood it to charge that, if the jury believed the witness, to *16answer the first issue, “Yes.” A juror arose and stated that the jurors had understood the Court so to charge.

The instruction of the Court, as to the first issue, was all the plaintiff could possibly have asked. There was no evidence that the defendant ejected plaintiff, *“molliter manus,”*but if the witness was to be believed, he did so violently and roughly. The jury having on the first issue returned that they did not believe the witness, it becomes' immaterial to consider the correctness of the instructions applicable’to the second issue. The Court will not deal with abstract propositions of law.

No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,701,860
<SECURITIES>                                 1,384,260
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,577,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,211
<INVENTORY>                                     69,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,736,514
<PP&E>                                         839,656
<DEPRECIATION>                                 729,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,112,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,569,048
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,982,842
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,439,564)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,112,326
<SALES>                                      3,292,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,292,092
<CGS>                                          385,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,060,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,242,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,005,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,005,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,005,006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         269,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,501,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,241,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,096,000
<PP&E>                                       7,365,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,447,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,621,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,724,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,600,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,621,000
<SALES>                                      4,058,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,058,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,066,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,135,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             188,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (331,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (331,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (331,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)






</TABLE>
---

Page 104 of 104

EXHIBIT 8

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

ATI Technologies Inc. (the
"Company") is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended August 31,
2004 (the "Report") with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Terry Nickerson, Senior Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|//Terry Nickerson//                                                                                                   | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                                                      | 
|Terry Nickerson 
        Senior Vice President, Finance and
        Chief Financial Officer 
        January 14, 2005 |