alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25267]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service <SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 514 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-135, K2025-133.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-25267 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 340

To amend the Cache La Poudre River Corridor Act to make technical

corrections, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. ALLARD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Cache La Poudre River Corridor Act to make

technical corrections, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER CORRIDOR.

4 Section 103(b) of the Cache La Poudre River Cor5 ridor Act (16 U.S.C. 461 note, Public Law 104–323) is

6 amended in paragraphs (12) through (19), by striking

7 ‘‘LARIMER COUNTY’’ each place it appears and inserting

8 ‘‘WELD COUNTY’’.
2

S 340 IS

1 SEC. 2. CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER CORRIDOR COMMISSION.

2 Section 104 of the Cache La Poudre River Corridor

3 Act (16 U.S.C. 461 note, Public Law 104–323) is

4 amended—

5 (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the

6 following:

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There is established a commis8 sion to be known as the ‘Cache La Poudre Corridor Com9 mission’ that shall—

10 ‘‘(1) administer the Corridor; and

11 ‘‘(2) provide certain services under this Act.’’;

12 and

13 (2) in subsection (b)(1)(A)(v)(III), by striking

14 ‘‘within’’ and inserting ‘‘in the vicinity of ’’.

Æ
SCWC-13-0000042

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

RODNEY Y. SATO, Petitioner/PlaintiffCounterclaim Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

vs.

WAHIAWA-CENTRAL OAHU HEALTH CENTER, INC., a Hawai#i 

non-profit corporation; and THE WAHIAWA HOSPITAL 

ASSOCIATION, a Hawai#i non-profit corporation, 

Respondents/DefendantsCounterclaimants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0000042; CIV. NO. 09-1-1087)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant/

Cross-Appellee Rodney Y. Sato’s application for writ of

certiorari filed on May 12, 2015, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 24, 2015.

Eric A. Seitz,

Della A. Belatti,

and Sarah R. Devine

for petitioner

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0000042

24-JUN-2015

07:56 AM
#### Genevieve L. Rigney, Respondent, *v.*The Horn & Hardart Co., Inc., Appellant.*

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

October 15, 1937.

(See headnote 163 Misc. 585.)

*Leonard H. Lester [William B. Bannister*of counsel], for the plaintiff.

*E. C. Sherwood*[O. *A. Thompson*of counsel], for the defendant.

*

 Revg. 163 Misc. 585.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed upon the law, with costs to defendant, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The evidence failed to show any condition of the stairway which could have been found to be the result of anything but the ordinary method of washing a stairway. The dividing line did not create two separate stairways. Plaintiff’s evidence shows that the work of cleaning was going on at the time she started to go down. *(Samuels*v. *Terry Holding Co., Inc.,*227 App. Div. 68; *Curtiss*v. *Lehigh Valley R. R. Co.,*233 N. Y. 554; *Abbott*v. *Richmond County Country Club,*211 App. Div. 231; affd., 240 N. Y. 693.) No opinion.

All concur. Present — MacCrate, Lewis and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 99.2

 

 

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

Of

American Community Properties Trust

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

	I, J. Michael Wilson, Chief Executive Officer of American Community Properties Trust, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Community Properties Trust for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Community Properties Trust.

 

 

 

 

/s/ J. Michael Wilson
J. Michael Wilson
Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Community Properties Trust and will be retained by American Community Properties Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PAUL S. LABINER,

Appellant,

v.

LESLEY WARD-KUHN and CORY MATTHEW MELTZER, CORY 

MELTZER LLC, a Florida limited liability Company a/k/a LAW OFFICE 

OF CORY MELTZER,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-3420

[March 1, 2018]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Paul B. Kanarek, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 2016CA000330.

Christopher W. Wickersham Jr., and Michael R. Yokan of Law Office of 

C.W. Wickersham, Jr., P.A., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Matthew M. Thomas and Joseph H. Graves of Graves Thomas Injury 

Law Group, Vero Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         463,000
<SECURITIES>                                    72,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,796,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,476,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,614,000
<PP&E>                                       7,325,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,160,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,497,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,580,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,901,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,902,000
<SALES>                                      4,140,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,140,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,059,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (212,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (212,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (212,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1






FIFTH
AMENDMENT
TO THE
OCEAN ENERGY,
INC.
LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE PLAN
FOR
NONEXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES



        WHEREAS,
there is reserved to the Board of Directors of Ocean Energy, Inc. (the "Board") in
Section 7 of the Ocean Energy, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan for Nonexecutive Employees
(the "Plan") the right to amend the Plan; 




        WHEREAS,
the Board desires to amend the Plan; 





        NOW,
THEREFORE, Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended effective for calendar
year 2001 by substituting “2,750,000” for “2,500,000” in all
places in said section; for calendar years after 2001, “2,750,000”
shall revert to “2,500,000” in all places in said section. 



        As
amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jeffrey A. Kupp, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inet Technologies, Inc.;

 

2.              Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.              The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)         Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)        Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)         Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.              The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)         All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)        Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  January 30, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Jeffrey A.  Kupp                       |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                              |   | Jeffrey A. Kupp                            |
|                              |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Magma DesignAutomation, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-74278, No. 333-92324, No. 333-108348, No. 333-112326 and No. 333-122656) and Form S-3 (No. 333-108346) of Magma Design Automation, Inc. of our report dated April 28, 2003 relating to consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Magma Design Automation, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2003, and related financial statement schedule, which report appears in this March 31, 2005 AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Magma Design Automation, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Mountain View, California 

June 14, 2005
#### Wood, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. Royce, Appellant: American Telephone & Telegraph Company and others, Impleaded Defendants and Respondents.

For the appellant: *Bird, Smith, Okoneski & Puchner,*attorneys, and *Richard P. Tinkham, Jr.,*of counsel, all of Wausau.

For the respondents Clinton F. Wood and American Telephone & Telegraph Company: *Fisher, Cashin & Reinholdt*of Stevens Point.

For the respondents Gordon Russell and Western Casualty & Surety Company: *Jenkins & Nason*of Stevens Point.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 521 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-143, K2025-141.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-25285 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Scott Morgan v. Amegy Bank National Association

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00322

- CV

Trial court case number: 2010

- 51109

Trial court: 189th District Court of Ha rris County

We are in receipt of Appellant’s Settlement Status Report filed July 21, 2014, which

requests an additional 45 days of suspension of appellate deadlines. After review of that filing,

the Court ORDERS appellee, Amegy Bank National Association, and its counsel, Carlton D.

Wilde, Jr., to also file a detailed status update on the efforts being made by Amegy to finalize

settlement. The status update of appellee is due within 14 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X Act ing individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 22, 2014
#### State of Iowa v. Clint Bragg, Appellant.

Conviction for liquor nuisance: no error shown by transcript.

*Appeal from Polk District Cowt.*— Hon. C. P. Holmes, Judge.

Thursday, February 8, 1894.

*Affirmed.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant was accused by information of the crime of owning and keeping intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same in violation of law. We infer from the record and the law that he was convicted of the crime charged in justice’s court, and appealed to the district court. He was found guilty in that court, and adjudged to pay a fine of fifty dollars and costs, and to he imprisoned in the county jail for a specified time if the fine and costs were not paid. Prom that judgment he appeals to this court. The cause is submitted to us on a transcript of the information, judgment, notice of appeal, and appeal bond. We have inspected the record before us, without discovering any error prejudicial to the defendant. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Jezebele Alicea Engineering & Analysis Division 

EPA West/Connecting Wing (Rm 6231 P) 

1301 Constitution Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Re: Draft Notes from Site Visit at AEP's Amos Plant on November 4, 2014 

Dear Ms. Alicea: 

We have reviewed the draft notes from the November 4, 2014, EPA site visit to the Amos 

Plant site, which includes the associated presentation and photographs. We are 

recommending changes to the site visit notes and have indicated which portions are 

considered to be confidential business information. These changes have been indicated 

in the electronic version provided on the enclosed CD. We have also answered the 

questions that were included in the notes and are providing the requested drawings and 

diagrams (on enclosed CD). Two-ofthese drawings are from the United Conveyor 

Corporation (UCC) and permission to share them with EPA has been obtained from UCC 

(see attached approval). 

The photographs provided on the EPA CD have been reviewed and are not considered to 

be confidential business information by AEP. 

If you have any other questions regarding the draft notes, you can contact me at 614-716-

1255 or at twlohner@aep.com. 

Sincerely, 

Timothy Lohner, Ph.D. 

Environmental Services Enclosure 

CBI_SE05649 _AEP _John Amos Site Visit Notes_07242015 rev.pdf 

CBI_AEP _Amos requested drawings.pdf 

UCC approval to share CBI drawings.pdf 

; ----------------.··- -· .-.
EXHIBIT 13.2


               CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT, ACCOUNTING
       OF OCEAN RIG ASA PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Amendment No. 1 to the annual
report for the year ended December 31, 2002 of Ocean Rig ASA (the "Issuer") on
Form 20-F/A (the "Form 20-F/A").

     I Erling Meinich-Bache, Senior Vice-President, Accounting, of the Issuer,
certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

        Dated:  March 30, 2004



                                                   /s/ ERLING MEINICH-BACHE
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Erling Meinich-Bache
                                                   Senior VP, Accounting



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE ISSUER AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE ISSUER AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.


                                       82
**EXHIBIT 15**
**LETTER RE: UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION**
Cintech Solutions, Inc.:
We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the AmericanInstitute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed interimfinancial information of Cintech Solutions, Inc. for the periods ended December31, 2001 and 2000, as indicated in our report dated January 25, 2002; becausewe did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in yourQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2001, isincorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-95366 and 333-94661on Form S-8.
We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) underthe Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the RegistrationStatement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared orcertified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.
"/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP”
Cincinnati, Ohio
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In
connection with the Annual Report of Able Energy Inc. (the "Company"), on Form
10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), Daniel L. Johnston, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






November
      13, 2007
            /s/
      Daniel L. Johnston
              Daniel
      L. Johnston
              Chief
      Financial Officer







[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Able Energy Inc. and will be retained by Able Energy Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Electric City Corp.
Elk Grove Village, Illinois We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms
S-8 (Nos. 333-121958 and 333-121959) and
S-3 (Nos. 333-117170 and 333-105084) of Electric City Corp. of our report dated February 11, 2005,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule which appears in this Form 10-K.
Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern. /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
March 29, 2005