alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,097,534
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,680,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 22,843,294
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       6,416,535
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         6,481,441
<LOANS>                                     89,779,424
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,447,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             133,291,755
<DEPOSITS>                                 114,264,769
<SHORT-TERM>                                   208,631
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,928,311
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,342,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,684,560
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,862,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             133,291,755
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,296,523
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              439,006
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                35,274
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,770,803
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,123,351
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,183,764
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,587,038
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   60,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,640
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,228,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                586,323
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     411,399
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   411,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.23
<LOANS-NON>                                    608,835
<LOANS-PAST>                                   249,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,383,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  120,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   125,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,448,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,448,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Number of gasoline-powered vehicles in the fleet in calendar year 2015

Light-duty vehicles Light-duty trucks Reverse

MY population MY population Total Cumulative Cumulative %

1985 424,187 1985 204,129 628,316 628,316

1986 336,346 1986 302,141 638,487 1,266,803 99.7%

1987 414,282 1987 314,655 728,937 1,995,741 99.4%

1988 508,944 1988 415,951 924,895 2,920,636 99.1%

1989 654,767 1989 490,567 1,145,334 4,065,970 98.6%

1990 796,921 1990 481,532 1,278,453 5,344,422 98.1%

1991 953,702 1991 538,293 1,491,995 6,836,417 97.5%

1992 1,142,730 1992 637,020 1,779,750 8,616,167 96.8%

1993 1,387,360 1993 845,816 2,233,176 10,849,343 96.0%

1994 1,652,240 1994 1,190,995 2,843,235 13,692,578 94.9%

1995 2,155,520 1995 1,403,082 3,558,602 17,251,180 93.6%

1996 2,162,100 1996 1,453,785 3,615,885 20,867,065 92.0%

1997 2,697,800 1997 2,008,042 4,705,842 25,572,907 90.3%

1998 2,986,410 1998 2,343,685 5,330,095 30,903,002 88.1%

1999 3,728,010 1999 2,900,004 6,628,014 37,531,016 85.6%

2000 4,810,390 2000 3,420,712 8,231,102 45,762,118 82.5%

2001 4,994,090 2001 3,742,388 8,736,478 54,498,596 78.7%

2002 5,628,610 2002 4,254,705 9,883,315 64,381,911 74.6%

2003 5,929,110 2003 4,490,434 10,419,544 74,801,455 70.0%

2004 5,820,200 2004 5,095,310 10,915,510 85,716,965 65.1%

2005 6,315,740 2005 5,185,780 11,501,520 97,218,485 60.0%

2006 6,382,430 2006 5,124,950 11,507,380 108,725,865 54.7%

2007 6,923,730 2007 4,814,247 11,737,977 120,463,842 49.3%

2008 6,306,980 2008 4,747,725 11,054,705 131,518,547 43.8%

2009 5,039,130 2009 2,636,019 7,675,149 139,193,696 38.7%

2010 5,507,730 2010 3,462,472 8,970,202 148,163,898 35.1%

2011 4,815,580 2011 3,534,306 8,349,886 156,513,784 30.9%

2012 7,659,600 2012 5,257,272 12,916,872 169,430,656 27.0%

2013 8,290,360 2013 6,016,150 14,306,510 183,737,166 21.0%

2014 8,675,410 2014 6,411,270 15,086,680 198,823,846 14.3%

2015 8,828,700 2015 6,840,610 15,669,310 214,493,156 7.3%
II

Calendar No. 83

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 574

[Report No. 106–39]

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections to a map relating

to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 10, 1999

Mr. BIDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

MARCH 26, 1999

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of March 25, 1999, by

Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections

to a map relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO MAP.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

6 shall make such corrections to the map described in sub-
2

•S 574 RS

1 section (b) as are necessary to move on that map the

2 boundary of the otherwise protected area (as defined in

3 section 12 of the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of

4 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3503 note; Public Law 101–591)) to the

5 Cape Henlopen State Park boundary to the extent

6 necessary—

7 (1) to exclude from the otherwise protected area

8 the adjacent property leased, as of the date of enact9 ment of this Act, by the Barcroft Company and

10 Cape Shores Associates (which are privately held

11 corporations under the law of the State of Dela12 ware); and

13 (2) to include in the otherwise protected area

14 the northwestern corner of Cape Henlopen State

15 Park seaward of the Lewes and Rehoboth Canal.

16 (b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map described in this

17 subsection is the map that is included in a set of maps

18 entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’, dated Octo19 ber 24, 1990, as revised October 15, 1992, and that re20 lates to the unit of the Coastal Barrier Resources System

21 entitled ‘‘Cape Henlopen Unit DE–03P’’.

Calendar No. 83

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 574

[Report No. 106–39]

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corResources System. rections to a map relating to the Coastal Barrier

MARCH 26, 1999

Reported without amendment
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a                               ( print page 83917)                            domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 440 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-28, K2025-27.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24028 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
---

---

EXHIBIT 8.1

PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES OF RETALIX LTD.

|Subsidiary                                    | Country ofResidence | Business Name           
|--------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------------
|Retalix Holdings Inc.                         | United States       | Retalix USA Holdings    
|Retalix USA Inc.                              | United States       | Retalix USA             
|Retail Control Systems Inc.                   | United States       | Retalix USA, Pittsburgh 
|BASS Inc.                                     | United States       | Retalix USA, Dayton     
|StoreNext Retail Technology LLC               | United States       | StoreNext USA           
|OMI International Inc.                        | United States       | OMI                     
|Palm Point Ltd.                               | Israel              | Palm Point              
|Tamar Industries M. R. Electronic (1985) Ltd. | Israel              | Tamar                   
|StoreAlliance.com, Ltd.                       | Israel              | StoreAlliance           
|StoreNext Ltd.                                | Israel              | StoreNext Israel        
|TradaNet Electronic Commerce Services Ltd.    | Israel              | Tradanet                
|IREX - Israel Retail Exchange Ltd.            | Israel              | IREX                    
|DemanDX Ltd.                                  | Israel              | DemanDX                 
|Cell-Time Ltd.                                | Israel              | Cell-Time               
|Retail College StoreNext Ltd.                 | Israel              | Retail College StoreNext
|P.O.S. (Restaurant Solutions) Ltd.            | Israel              | PRS                     
|Kohav Orion Advertising and Information Ltd.  | Israel              | Orion                   
|Retalix (UK) Limited                          | United Kingdom      | Retalix (UK)            
|UNIT S.p.A                                    | Italy               | Retalix Italia          
|Retalix France SARL                           | France              | Retalix France          
|Retalix Australia PTY Ltd.                    | Australia           | Retalix Australia       
|Retalix SA PTY Ltd.                           | South Africa        | Retalix SA              



---

---
Dear Ms. Romero:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−3068). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Your petition references the material(s) listed below, however the material(s) was/were

not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced 

materials:

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM)

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 11/16/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael Cameron

Program Analyst
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00124

- CR

JEFFREY TODD BLACKBU RN

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 0194

ORDER

The appellant’s brief is overdue in this appeal.

We abate this appeal to the trial court to conduct any necessary hearings within

30 days of the date of this Order pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

38.8(b)(2) and (3). T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b)(2), (3).

The supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records required by the rule, if any, are

ordered to be filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. See id

.

PER CURIAMBlack burn v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed September 4 , 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DAVID NAUGHTON

, §

§ No. 540

, 201 6

Defendant Below, §

Appellant

, § Court Below

— Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware

v. §

§ Cr. ID No. 1306023761A

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§

Plaintiff Below

, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: May 8 , 201 7

Decided: May 11 , 201 7

O R D E R

T his 11th day of May 2017

, it appears to the Court that the Clerk issued a

notice , by certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal

should not be dismissed for the appellant’s failure to file the opening brief and

appendix . Th e appellant received the not ice to show cause on April 25, 2017, and

ha s not responded to the notice within the required ten

- day period

. Accordingly,

d ismissal of th is appeal is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that th e appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40671 USDC No. C-98-CR-112-1 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GILBERTO REYNA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - December 2, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Gilberto Reyna has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Reyna has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief, the response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Complete the following tables for each sampling pointPlant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionSample CollectionTime Temperature (°C)pH(S.U.)Set 1 - Grab 1Set 1 - Grab 2Set 1 - Grab 3Set 1 - Grab 4Set 2 - Grab 1Set 2 - Grab 2Set 2 - Grab 3Set 2 - Grab 4Set 3 - Grab 1Set 3 - Grab 2Set 3 - Grab 3Set 3 - Grab 4Set 4 - Grab 1Set 4 - Grab 2Set 4 - Grab 3Set 4 - Grab 4NOTE: For influent samples, only the grab 1 row needs to be completed.Plant NameSampleCollectionNumberWeak Acid andGrey WaterSamplesCollected asGrabs(Yes or No)Mercury and CyanideSamples Collected asGrabs(Yes or No)Condensate Samples(Except Mercury &Cyanide) Collected as24-Hour Composites(Yes or No)Tyvek Suits used(Yes or No)Dust MasksUsed forMercury(Yes or No)CleanHands/DirtyHandsSamplingTechniquesUsed(Yes or No)Description ofSample CollectionTechnique (ifdifferent thaninstructions)Description ofAbnormal Conditions inGasifier, SourWater/Grey Water, orEvaporator Systemsthat May ImpactProcess/WastewaterCharacteristicsSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4

# Daily Power Generation (MW-hrs)

Unit 1 Plant Name Date Provide the daily power generation for the IGCC unit starting two weeks prior to the first set of

samples through the last set of samplesNeutralizedWeak AcidStream to GreyWater SurgeTankCondensate toGrey WaterSurge Tankfrom VacuumFlash OverheadCondenserSettler Overflowto Grey WaterSurge TankGrey WaterSurge TankFeed to VaporCompressionEvaporatorGrey WaterSurge TankFeed to SyngasScrubbersConcentratedBrine Feed toForcedCirculationEvaporator(from VaporCompressionEvap)Condensatefrom VaporCompressionEvaporatorCondensatefrom ForcedCirculationEvaporatorAmount ofSolids (BrineCrystals)Generated forDisposal(tons/day)Plant Name DateProvide the average flow rate in the gasification/wastewater treatment system for each stream included in the table starting two weeks prior to the first set of samplesthrough the last set of samplesGasification/Wastewater Treatment System Flow Rates(gpd)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DR. STEVEN GREENFIELD,

Respondent

v.

HANOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 405 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<MULTIPLIER> 1
        
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          49,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,555
<PP&E>                                         152,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 269,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     37,861
<COMMON>                                           378
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   269,526
<SALES>                                         12,400 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,400 
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (59,427)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (59,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (59,427)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


        





</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84340-84341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24449]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice of Members of Senior Executive Service Performance 
Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the membership of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Senior Executive Service (SES) 
Performance Review Board (PRB).

DATES: These appointments are effective on November 14, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Send comments concerning this notice to: Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, 
DC 20004-2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LeMont Neal by telephone at (202) 826-
9667, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e725b5351504a707e5a50584d5c10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f5b990989a9b81bbb5919b938697db929a83">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(1) through (5) requires 
each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Office of Personnel Management, one or more performance review 
boards. The PRB shall review and evaluate the initial summary rating of 
the senior executives' performance, the executives' responses, and the 
higher-level officials' comments on the initial summary rating. In 
addition, the PRB will recommend executive performance bonuses and pay 
increases. The DNFSB is a small, independent Federal agency; therefore, 
the members of the DNFSB SES Performance Review Board listed in this 
notice are drawn from the SES ranks of other agencies. The following 
persons comprise a standing roster to serve as members of the Defense 
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board SES Performance Review Board:


[[Page 84341]]


    Andrea Kock, Deputy Office Director for Engineering, Office of 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Delores Thompson, Counsel to the Inspector General U.S. 
Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, Office of Legal 
Services.
    Suzann K. Gallagher, Deputy Assistant Inspector General, 
Investigative Operations Department of Labor, Office of Inspector 
General.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 4314.

    Dated: October 10, 2024.
Mary J. Buhler,
Executive Director of Operations.
[FR Doc. 2024-24449 Filed 10-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 11, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00433

- CV

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & POST OAK CLEAN

GREEN, INC

. , Appellant

v.

GUADALUPE COUNTY GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

, Appellee

From the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 0863

- CV

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

The panel has considered the appellee ’ s motion for rehearing, a nd the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of May, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court