alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2614-042]


City of Hamilton, Ohio, American Municipal Power, Inc.: Notice of 
Reasonable Period of Time for Water Quality Certification Application

    On October 23, 2024, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio 
EPA) submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) 
notice that it received a complete application for a Clean Water Act 
section 401(a)(1) water quality certification, as defined in 40 CFR 
121.5, from City of Hamilton, Ohio and American Municipal Power, Inc. 
in conjunction with the above captioned project on October 17, 2024. 
Pursuant to section 4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,\1\ we 
hereby notify Ohio EPA of the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5) (2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: October 17, 2024.
    Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One 
year (October 17, 2025).
    If Ohio EPA fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before the above date, then the certifying 
authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean 
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: October 24, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-25271 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit
23.1











CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration
Statements of Viking Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form S-8 (File No.
333-164375 and 333-150912) of our report dated February 22, 2010, relating to
the financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended December
31, 2009 and 2008, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February
22, 2010.







/s/Squar, Milner, Peterson,
Miranda & Williamson, LLP





San
Diego, California


February
22, 2010
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, John S. Quinn, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of LKQ Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

March 18, 2014



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JOHN S. QUINN                                   
|John S. Quinn                                       
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3148

HENRY J. MUMME, JR.,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in NY3330080318-I-1.

ON MOTION

Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The Department of Veterans Affairs moves to reform the official caption to

designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent. We treat Henry J.

Mumme, Jr.'s submission received on June 11, 2009 as an opposition to the motion.

The Board dismissed Mumme's appeal, challenging his non-selection for a

registered nurse position, for lack of jurisdiction. The Board determined that the

appointment of medical professionals under 38 U.S.C. §§ 7401, 7403 is not subject to

veterans' preference rights and thus Mumme has no right to appeal an alleged violation of

such rights. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the

respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the
Board. In this case, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the

Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this

order.

FOR THE COURT

JUN 3 0 2009

Date

cc:	Henry J. Humme, Jr.

Matthew H. Solomson, Esq.

Joyce G. Friedman, Esq.

s20

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

Ines

u.s• SOURTgF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUN 3 0 2009

JAN HOR8ALY

CLERK

2009-3148	 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 470 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-73, K2025-71.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24077 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE423]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Summer Flounder, 
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Monitoring Committee will hold a public 
webinar meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 19, 2024, from 9 
a.m. until 12 p.m. For agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information 
will be posted at www.mafmc.org prior to the meeting.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea 
Bass Monitoring Committee will meet via webinar to discuss 2025 
recreational management measures for all three species. Last year, two-
year recreational measures were adopted for summer flounder and scup 
for 2024-2025, with the intent to review 2025 measures in 2024. For 
black sea bass, recreational measures were previously set only for 
2024. The objectives of this meeting are for the Monitoring Committee 
to: (1) Review recent recreational fishery performance information and 
recommendations from the Advisory Panel, (2) Review previously adopted 
recreational measures for summer flounder and scup and recommend any 
changes if warranted; and (3) Recommend 2025 recreational measures for 
black sea bass. Meeting materials will be posted to www.mafmc.org.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: October 25, 2024.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-25203 Filed 10-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                               CERTIFICATE OF THE
                           CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                             TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350):

         I, Ernest T. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of Tower Automotive, Inc.,
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

         (1)      The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and;

         (2)      The information contained in this quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tower
Automotive, Inc.

                                     TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

Date: August 12, 2003                By: /s/ Ernest T. Thomas
                                        --------------------------------
                                          Ernest T. Thomas
                                     Its: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tower Automotive, Inc. and will be retained by Tower Automotive,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SKRM Interactive, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Pericles DeAvila, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Pericles DeAvilaPericles
                DeAvila, President
              March
                  3, 2008
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 10731

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Benny Dennis,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:17

- CV

- 2

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
Benny Dennis, federal prisoner number # 48551

- 177, applies for a certificate of appealability (COA) following the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, wherein he sought to challenge his conviction o n one count of possession with intent t o distribute methamphetamine. Dennis argues that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered due to

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 9, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-10731 Document: 00515931866 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2021No. 20

- 10731

2 ineffective assistance of counsel, and that the district court failed to hold an evidentiary hearing.
To obtain a COA, a defendant must fir st make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies a COA on the merits, the movant must demonstrate that “reasonable jurists would find the district court’s

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v.
McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Dennis has made no such showing. Accordingly, his motion for a COA is DENIED . Dennis’s motion for the appointment of counsel is also DENIED

. As Dennis fails to make the required showing for a COA on his constitutional claim, “ we have no power to say anything about his request for an evidentiary hearing

. ” United States v. Davis , 971 F.3d 524, 534

- 35 (5th Cir. 2020), petition for cert. filed (U. S. Mar. 18, 2021) (No. 20

- 7553). Case: 20-10731 Document: 00515931866 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 38430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2013-13719]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8351]

Notice of Meeting of Advisory Committee on International Law

Correction

    In notice document 2013-13719, appearing on page 34702 in the issue 
of Monday, June 10, 2013, make the following correction:
    In the third column, in the last paragraph, the entry ``(202-776-
8442 or lermanjb@state.gov.mailto:KillTP@state.gov)'' is corrected to 
read ``(202-776-8442 or lermanjb@state.gov mailto:KillTP@state.gov)''.

[FR Doc. C1-2013-13719 Filed 6-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Joenathan Knight, Also Known as Joseph Knight, Defendant.

County Court, Monroe County,

January 15, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Howard R. Relin, District Attorney (Janice Iati*of counsel), for plaintiff. *James Mulley*for defendant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

John J. Connell, J.

The following constitutes the opinion, decision and order of the court.

A felony complaint was filed on January 2, 1988 charging the defendant with the crimes of robbery in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree. He was arraigned on the felony complaint on January 4, 1988 in the City Court of Rochester. *79That felony complaint is still pending before the City Court of Rochester.

The People, by way of order to show cause signed on January 11, 1988, have requested that this court, sitting in its capacity as a Part I court, order the defendant to stand in a lineup with reference to the above-mentioned felony complaint. It is the practice in this county for the Part I Judge to entertain bail review applications, impanel the Grand Jury sitting that term, hear cases involving extradition proceedings, entertain various motions preindictment concerning defendants who have been held for action by the Grand Jury and preindictment suppression motions as well as the court’s regular calendar of cases. It has also been the practice of the District Attorney’s office in this county to bring motions similar to the one brought in this case.

CPL 240.40 (2) authorizes the District Attorney to ask for an order directing a lineup when brought before "the court in which an indictment, superior court information, prosecutor’s information, information or simplified information charging a misdemeanor is pending”. There is no reference in the statute authorizing such action concerning a "felony complaint”. Although applications in the past have been routinely granted by the Part I Judge in County Court, the defendant herein has opposed the People’s application and in support of his position, has submitted to the court a letter from James A. Yates, Esq., dated December 15, 1987, to a member of the Public Defender’s office of Monroe County. Mr. Yates is counsel to the majority of the New York State Assembly.

In discussing the legislative history of CPL 240.40 (2), Mr. Yates stresses that the omission of "felony complaint” from this section was not inadvertent.

Certainly a clear reading of the statute shows that the only form of accusatory instruments that was not listed was a felony complaint. The legislative history of this statute suggests that negotiations between the Governor’s office, the Senate, the District Attorney’s Association, the Office of Court Administration and the State Bar Association resulted in the compromise language as passed by the Legislature.

Accordingly, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the People’s motion and the same is in all respects hereby denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CIK>     0001065419
<NAME>    KEY COMPONENTS INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (175)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,487
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,036
<PP&E>                                          17,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,513)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,710
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,674
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,144
<SALES>                                         61,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,862
<CGS>                                           39,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   155
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,716
<INCOME-TAX>                                        97
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,619
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,616
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>No EPS for the Company has been calculated as its common stock is 
privately held.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

The undersigned, Elie S.Akilian, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Inet Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

1.               The Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the aforementioned Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

 

 
| /s/ Elie S. Akilian                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |
| January 30, 2004                 |

 

----
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Jock Carlisle, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J. at plea; Alexander M. Tisch, J. at sentencing), rendered September 17, 2014, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of petit larceny, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J. at plea; Alexander M. Tisch, J. at sentencing), rendered September 17, 2014, affirmed.</p><p>Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (<i>see Anders v California</i>, 386 US 738 [1967]; <i>People v Saunders</i>, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders</i>, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 18, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>