alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                             ADFLEX SOLUTIONS, INC.

          EXHIBIT (11.1) - COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Three Months Ended              Six Months Ended
                                                                     June 30,                          June 30,
                                                             ----------------------         --------------------------
                                                               1998            1997            1998               1997
                                                               ----            ----            ----               ----
<S>                                                          <C>              <C>           <C>                  <C>
Net income (loss)                                            $ (3,574)        $1,880        $       (943)        $2,752
                                                             ========         ======        ============         ======
COMPUTATION OF SHARES USED IN NET INCOME (LOSS) PER
SHARE:

    Weighted average common shares outstanding                  8,835          8,682               8,820          8,674
    Incremental common equivalent shares representing
        shares issuable upon exercise of stock
        options (1)                                                --            118                  --            110
                                                             --------         ------        ------------         ------
             Total weighted average shares -
                 Diluted                                        8,835          8,800               8,820          8,784
                                                             ========         ======        ============         ======
             Total weighted average shares -
                 Basic                                          8,835          8,682               8,820          8,674
                                                             ========         ======        ============         ======
Net income (loss) per diluted common and
    common equivalent share                                  $   (.40)        $  .21        $       (.11)        $  .31

                                                             ========         ======        ============         ======
Net income(loss) per basic common
    and common equivalent share                              $   (.40)        $  .22        $       (.11)        $ ..32
                                                             ========         ======        ============         ======
</TABLE>

--------
(1) Amount calculated using the treasury stock method and fair market values
for stock.
NO. 12-10-00085-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

OSCAR CESAR VEGA,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana in a drug free zone, and the 

trial court assessed punishment at imprisonment for eight years. We have received the 

trial court’s certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel. Accordingly, 

the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered April 7, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned,
Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 17, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jason K. Wadzinski 
|                    |  |     |  | Jason K. Wadzinski     
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 24, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 485 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-91, K2025-89.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24609 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 50774 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CARLO LEE REYES , also known as El Raton,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:12

- CR

- 527

- 1

Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carlo Lee Reyes was convicted, following a jury trial, of aiding and abetting smuggling goods from the United States and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The district court sentenced Reyes to the statutory maximum terms of imprisonment on eac h count and ordered the sentences to run consecutively, for a total sentence of 240 months of imprisonment and a three

- year term of supervised release. Reyes argues that his sentence is

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 7, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-50774 Document: 00513106569 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/07/2015No. 14

- 50774

2 substantively unreasonable because the application of the statutes of convictions and guidelines produced an excessive sentence that effectively punished him twice for the same conduct, i.e

. the trafficking of firearms. He also argues that the 240

- month sentence fails to take into account his difficult childhood and th e ag e of his prior conviction. Reyes does not dispute that his 240

- month sentence was imposed within a properly

- calculated guide lines range. Thus, a presumption of reasonableness applies to his sentence. See United States v. Alonzo , 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th C ir. 2006). Reyes ’s mere disagreement with the applicable statutes of convictions and guidelines is insufficient to demonstrate that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. Insofar as Reyes contends that the district court failed to take into account his personal history and characteristics, these factors do not require a district court to impose a sentence lower than a guideline range sentence. See United States v. Ruiz , 621 F.3d 390, 398 (5th Cir. 2010). The district court heard defense counsel’s a rguments, but apparently determined that a sentence within the advisory guidelines range would provide an “adequate . . . fair and reasonable sentence.” Reyes’s disagreement with the district court’s evaluation of the sentencing factors is not sufficient to rebut the presumption of reasonableness. See Ruiz , 62 1 F.3d
398. AFFIRMED. Case: 14-50774 Document: 00513106569 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/07/2015
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4817-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-4817-DR), dated September 16, 2024, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 23, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include permanent work 
under the Public Assistance program for the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared 
a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 16, 
2024.

    Ascension, Assumption, Lafourche, St. Charles, St. Mary, and 
Terrebonne Parishes for permanent work [Categories C-G] (already 
designated for Individual Assistance and assistance for debris 
removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], 
including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance 
program).
    East Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, Livingston, Orleans, 
Plaquemines, St. Helena, St. Martin, St. Tammany, Washington, and 
West Feliciana Parishes for Public Assistance.
    Jefferson Parish for Individual Assistance.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24665 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 10.5
                                   Putun, LLC
                                 P.O. Box 50464
                            Henderson, NV 89016-0464

                                 August 30, 2001

Hunapu Inc.
1700 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway
Henderson, NV 89012

To Whom It May Concern:

Reference is hereby made to that certain promissory note in the amount of $7,500
made by Hunapu Inc. and held by Putun, LLC, which is due and payable on the date
hereof.

Putun hereby extends the date upon which said promissory note shall be due and
payable to on or before August 30, 2002.

Very truly yours,

PUTUN, LLC


By: /s/ John C. Francis
    ----------------------------------------
        John C. Francis
#### Freye and wife, Respondents, vs. Walters and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Benton, Bosser, Becker & Parnell*of Appleton.

For the respondents : *Everson, Ryan & Hanaway*of Green Bay.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
No. 14-15-00190-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTEEN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 

CHRISTINE E. REULE, 

Appellant 

v. 

JOHN R. BELUS 

Appellee 

__________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from Cause No. 2014-37325 

190TH Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas 

__________________________________________________________________ 

APPELLANT’S STATEMENT TO COURT THAT ITS’ NOT 

PROVIDING NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

CHRISTINE E. REULE 

Pro Se 

1831 Sherwood Forest #24 

Houston, Texas 77043 

(713) 365-0535 

 

ACCEPTED

14-15-00190-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

3/19/2015 4:25:17 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/19/2015 4:25:17 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL 

Appellant, Christine E. Reule, hereby certifies that the following are 

the list of parties and their respective counsel, if any, to the best of 

her knowledge and understanding of the rules. 

PARTIES COUNSEL 

Appellant 

CHRISTINE E. REULE Pro Se 

 1831 Sherwood Forest 

 #24 

 Houston, Texas 77043 

 (713) 365-0535 

 Creule@msn.com 

Appellee 

 JOHN R. BELUS D. John Neese 

 2118 Smith Street 

 Houston, Texas 77002 

 jneese@hmgnc.com 

KELLY SANCHEZ AND VALLOUREC Jeffrey D. Burbach 

DRILLING PRODUCTS USA, INC Jackson Walker L.L.P. 

 1401 McKinney, 

 Suite 1900 

 Houston, Texas 77010

 713.752.4262 (direct)

 jburbach@jw.com

 WENDY HATZ AND DURA 

 BOND PIPE COREY REED 

 Thompson Coe Cousins & 

 Irons, L.L.P 

 One Riverway, Suite 1400 

 Houston, Texas 77056 

 Phone: 713-403-8213 

 creed@thompsoncoe.com
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS: 

 Christine E. Reule, Appellant, and those similarly situated, 

respectfully submits this Statement/Notice to this Court that it is 

not providing copies of documents to all parties, and would show 

the Court as follows: 

 On February 20, 2015, Appellant filed an appeal of her entire 

case, obviously, including all parties. Appellant was informed today 

by Mr. Jeffrey Burbach, attorney for Kelly Sanchez and Vallourec 

Drilling Products USA, Inc., that he is not getting notices from the 

Court of Appeals. Appellant is not sure why, but wants the court to 

be aware of the situation and to ensure that all parties are provided 

with proper notices. Therefore, Appellant asks this court to please 

include all parties in its notices. 

Dated: March 19, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/Christine Reule 

________________________________ 

Christine E. Reule 

 1831 Sherwood Forest #24 

 Houston, Texas 77043 

 Creule@msn.com 
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING 

 The above and foregoing document was served in accordance 

with Rule 21a on this 19th day of March 2015, on all interested 

parties in this case.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stuart Grayston,
President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|                                            
|/S/    THOMAS
MCMAHON                       
|Thomas McMahon                              
|Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)

March 29, 2010
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10423

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CAROLE RUTH SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:92-CR-500-D

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carole Ruth Smith, federal prisoner # 23664-077, appeals the

judgment of the district court denying her motion to vacate, set

aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. She raises

the sole issue whether the district court erred in denying relief

on her claim that she received ineffective assistance of counsel

at trial.

The record before the court is inadequate to accomplish

meaningful appellate review. See United States v. Pierce, 959
No. 97-10423

-2-

F.2d 1297, 1301 (5th Cir. 1992) (citing inter alia United States

v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987)). Smith’s claims

of ineffective assistance of counsel are not procedurally barred

because, as a general rule, they cannot be resolved on direct

appeal unless a record exists to evaluate such a claim. Id. In

this case the record has not been developed in the district

court. Accordingly, we VACATE the judgment of the district court

and REMAND the case to afford the district court an opportunity

to address Smith’s claims. The motion for bail pending appeal is

DENIED.

VACATED AND REMANDED; BAIL PENDING APPEAL DENIED.
#### CHRISTOPHER WATKINS’ ADM’R. *vs.*JAMES D. PEMBERTON *et al.*

The next of kin of an intestate have a right to appeal from an order obtained by an Administrator to sell the slaves of the estate for distribution.

This was an appeal from a judgment of his Honor Judge SauNDBRS, reversing an order of the County Court of Anson.

There were no debts to be paid' beyond what could be paid out of the proceeds of the other personal property, but the administrator, deeming it the most convenient mode of settling with the distributees, applied for an order to have the slaves of the estate sold: there were thirty-one slaves; and there were eleven distributees, all of whom were adults: seven of these opposed the order, and on its being made, appealed to the superior court.

*175In the superior court, his Honor refused a motion to dismiss the appeal, and ordered the judgment below to be reversed ; from which judgment the plaintiff appealed to this Court.

*Ashe,*for the plaintiff.

*Winston,*for the defendant.

Battle, J.

The only question presented by the record is, whether an appeal to the superior court could be taken from the order of the county court, and we are clearly of opinion that it could. Those of the next of kin of the plaintiff’s intestate who preferred a division of the slaves to a sale of them for partition, by the administrator, were certainly *interested*in the order of sale made by the county court. Being so, and being dissatisfied with it, they had a right to appeal from it by the express words of the first section of the 4th chapter of the Eevised Statutes *“*concerning appeals and proceedings in the nature of Appeals.”

The present is the same in principle as the case of *Murphrey*v. *Wood, ante*63, in which we held, at the last term, that the right of appeal was given.

The order of the superior court, reversing that of the county court, is affirmed ; and this opinion must be certified as the law directs.

Pee OueiaM. Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of FoneFriend, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Robin Glanzl, President of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

/s/Robin Glanzl                             

RobinGlanzl

President

August23, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                    RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Fantatech Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the "Report"), I,
Guangwei  Liang,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Rule  13a-14(b)  and  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 22, 2004

/s/ Guangwei Liang, Chief Executive Officer
-------------------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer


<PAGE>