alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q for quarter ending March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,103
<INVENTORY>                                      7,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,025
<PP&E>                                         554,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 633,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,429
<BONDS>                                        352,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   633,842
<SALES>                                         85,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,429
<CGS>                                           58,325
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,459
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,330
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,129
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (4,903)
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,226
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT2

Idaho Power Company Environmental Department, Aquatics Checklist For Use Prior To First Flight, and AfterMajor Maintenance OrUpgrades 1. Remove the Propellers. 2. Check all fasteners, screws, and Velcro for tightness and security. 3. Ensure that the transmitter- receiver have been "bound". 4. Tumon the transmitter. 5. Check MK-Tools for proper mixer, k-value, switch, and poti settings. 6. Check that "emergency time" in MK-Tools is set to maximum value of 247, equal to about 24 seconds (this allows a short amount oftime to react in case ofa loss oflink). 7. Check that "emergency gas" in MK-Tools is set to 45. 8. Connect a fully charged battery, and allowthe electronics to initialize (listen for a "chirp" from each motor, and watch to ensure that each motor makes a shortrevolution). 9. Confirm that initial gyro and ace leveling calibrations have been completed. 10. Ensure that the MikroKopter is placed in a level position (the use ofa leveling bubble is helpful). 11. Switch "flight mode" to beginner on the transmitter by holding the left stickto upper left while holding the right stick at upper center (hold until you hear 3 "beeps"). 12. Ifyou do not hear 3 "beeps" the transmitter is inthe wrong moderepeat the above process.13. Start motors (hold left stick to lower right position). 14. Perform a test run-up ofthe motors using the transmitter (this is done withoutpropellers!). 15. Checkthat the rotation ofeach motor is inthe proper direction. 16. This testrun-up will also inform you as to whether the throttle is set correctly (at idle, the left stick should be at bottom center, at full throttle the left stick should be at top center). 17. Stop the motors by holding the left stick in the lower left position. 18. Disconnectthe battery. 19. Tum offthe transmitter. 20. Install the propellers, ensuring that they are on the proper motor (ensuring properrotational order). 21. Check thatthe propeller hex screws are tight. 22. Take the MikroKopter to an isolated test flight field. 23. Place the MikroKopter as level as possible (again, a leveling bubble helps). 24. Tumthe transmitter on. 25. Connect a fully charged battery to the MikroKopter. 26. Allow the electronics to initialize (listen for the 3 "beeps" and watch for each motor to do a short revolution). 27. Perform a "gyro calibration" (hold the left stick to the upper left position until a series of"beeps" is heard; the gyro calibration must occurprior to each and every flight). 28. Start motors (hold left stick to lower rightposition). 29. Increase throttlejustenough that the MikroKopter becomes "light on its feet" (not enough throttle to actually lift off). 30. Withthe MikroKopter "light on its feet," check the performance ofthe following controls, and adjust withtrim controls onthe transmitter is necessary:

2a. Nick (forward/backward); b. Roll (left/right); and c. Yaw(clockwise/counterclockwise rotation).
31.Reducethrottleto idle.
32. Stop the motors (place the left stick at the lower l eftposition).
33. Disconnect thebattery.
34
. Turn offthe transmitter.

3
#### Joseph Sedwitz, Plaintiff, *v.*Roy W. Arnold and Maurice Goodman, Defendants.

City Court of New York, Special Term, New York County,

November 16, 1937.

*Alfred Lyons,*for the plaintiff.

*MaxL. Schallek,*for the defendants.

Wendel, Ch. J.

Motion for summary judgment is granted. The answer of defendants is stricken out and judgment awarded *893plaintiff against defendants as demanded in the complaint. Execution stayed until five days after notice of entry of judgment on the attorneys for the defendants. It is settled law that the acceptance by a creditor of the promissory note of his debtor for his antecedent debt does not extinguish it unless the note is paid. It is not an absolute but a conditional payment of the debt. A clear agreement by the creditor that he will take the risk of the payment of the note and that the debt is discharged thereby or the indubitable intention of both the parties to that effect is requisite to extinguish a debt by the taking of the debtor’s note. An agreement that a debt shall be paid by the note of the debtor is a contract for an extension of the time of payment and that the debt shall be paid or that it has been paid by the note of the debtor on condition that the note is paid but not otherwise. (See *Leschen & Sons Rope Co.*v. *Mayflower G. M. & R. Co.,*173 Fed. 855. See, also, 35 L. R. A. [N. S.] 1, with notes of New York cases to the same effect.) No facts are submitted by the defendants showing that the intention of the parties was that the obligation of the debtor was to be paid by the giving of the notes and hence there is no rebuttal of the strong presumption that the parties did not so intend and that the debt was not extinguished by the notes. Order filed.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 5/24/2012

Form REP-703

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Sample Number: 122228-001 Date Collected: 05/16/2012 06:30 Date Received: 5/16/2012

1st Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Selenium, Se 210 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 05/23/2012 10:26 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 122228-002 Date Collected: 05/16/2012 06:30 Date Received: 5/16/2012

2nd Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Selenium, Se 21.2 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 05/23/2012 10:31 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 122228-003 Date Collected: 05/16/2012 06:30 Date Received: 5/16/2012

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Selenium, Se 0.4 ug/L J 0.5 0.1 DPC 05/23/2012 10:36 EPA 200.8

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 122228 Page 1 of 1
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 498

To require vessels entering the United States waters to provide earlier notice

of the entry, to clarify the requirements for those vessels and the authority of the Coast Guard over those vessels, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To require vessels entering the United States waters to provide earlier notice of the entry, to clarify the requirements for those vessels and the authority of the Coast

Guard over those vessels, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF COAST GUARD AUTHORITY

4 TO CONTROL VESSELS IN TERRITORIAL WA5 TERS OF THE UNITED STATES.

6 The Ports and Waterways Safety Act (33 U.S.C.

7 1221 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the follow8 ing:
2

•S 498 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 15. ENTRY OF VESSELS INTO TERRITORIAL SEA; DI2 RECTION OF VESSELS BY COAST GUARD.

3 ‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION OF COAST GUARD.—

4 ‘‘(1) NOTIFICATION.—Under regulations pre5 scribed by the Secretary, a commercial vessel enter6 ing the territorial sea of the United States shall no7 tify the Secretary not later than 24 hours before

8 that entry.

9 ‘‘(2) INFORMATION.—The regulations under

10 paragraph (1) shall specify that the notification shall

11 contain the following information:

12 ‘‘(A) The name of the vessel.

13 ‘‘(B) The port or place of destination in

14 the United States.

15 ‘‘(C) The time of entry into the territorial

16 sea.

17 ‘‘(D) With respect to the fuel oil tanks of

18 the vessel—

19 ‘‘(i) the capacity of those tanks; and

20 ‘‘(ii) the estimated quantity of fuel oil

21 that will be contained in those tanks at the

22 time of entry into the territorial sea.

23 ‘‘(E) Any information requested by the

24 Secretary to demonstrate compliance with appli25 cable international agreements to which the

26 United States is a party.
3

•S 498 IS

1 ‘‘(F) If the vessel is carrying dangerous

2 cargo, a description of that cargo.

3 ‘‘(G) A description of any hazardous condi4 tions on the vessel.

5 ‘‘(H) Any other information requested by

6 the Secretary.

7 ‘‘(b) DENIAL OF ENTRY.—The Secretary may deny

8 entry of a vessel into the territorial sea of the United

9 States if—

10 ‘‘(1) the Secretary has not received notification

11 for the vessel in accordance with subsection (a); or

12 ‘‘(2) the vessel is not in compliance with any

13 other applicable law relating to marine safety, secu14 rity, or environmental protection.

15 ‘‘(c) DIRECTION OF VESSEL.—The Secretary may di16 rect the operation of any vessel in the navigable waters

17 of the United States as necessary during hazardous cir18 cumstances, including the absence of a pilot required by

19 Federal or State law, weather, casualty, vessel traffic, or

20 the poor condition of the vessel.’’.

Æ
#### Charles M. Tea, Jr., et al., Appellants, v Ronald D. Strom et al., Respondents.

[773 NYS2d 322]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Joseph Gerace, J.), entered December 2, 2002. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants’ motion in *1033part, dismissed the fourth cause of action and denied the cross motion of plaintiffs for admission of their son pro hac vice to serve as co-counsel.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting the cross motion and as modified the order is affirmed with costs to plaintiffs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying the cross motion of plaintiffs seeking to admit their son pro hac vice to serve as co-counsel in representing them, in conjunction with their present attorney. In support of the cross motion, plaintiffs’ son submitted an affidavit in which he stated that he is admitted to the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and is a member in good standing of the Pennsylvania bar. The court denied the cross motion “due to [the] possible personal involvement [of plaintiffs’ son] in the matter and the possibility of a counter-claim [sic] or separate action against him by the defendants.” Although defendants rely on the court’s reference to the “possible personal involvement [of plaintiffs’ son] in the matter” in support of their contention that the cross motion was properly denied, the record discloses no basis for any such “possible” involvement. In addition, at the time plaintiffs made the cross motion and the court issued its decision thereon, defendants had not filed any counterclaim or separate action. “The mere possibility that [plaintiffs’ son would] be called to testify ... is an inadequate excuse to justify disqualification” *(O’Donnell, Fox & Gartner v R-2000 Corp.,*198 AD2d 154, 155; *see NYK Line [N. Am.] v Mitsubishi Bank,*171 AD2d 486, 487-488 [1991]; *see generally*22 NYCRR 1200.21; *S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp.,*69 NY2d 437, 444-446 [1987]). In any event, we note that, although defendants filed counterclaims 10 days after entry of the order herein, the court subsequently dismissed the counterclaims with prejudice, upon the consent of the parties. Thus, even assuming, arguendo, that the subsequently filed counterclaims are relevant to our decision herein, we would nevertheless conclude that they do not support the court’s denial of the cross motion. We therefore modify the order by granting plaintiffs’ cross motion. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
**Exhibit 10.17**

 

**DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY**

 

Effective July 1, 2008, the Board increased the annual retainer for the directors who are not employed by Cedar Management Limited, our managementcompany, from $15,000 to $20,000. The additional amount was paid in the common shares of the Company. 

 

In addition to the annual retainer, the directors who are not employed by Cedar Management Limited are also paid $700 per half day for each board meetingand $175 per hour for each committee meeting attended during the calendar year. All of our officer positions are filled by directors without any salary or other compensation. Directors are entitled to receive compensation and reimbursement forexpenses incurred in attending board or committee meetings or when otherwise acting on our behalf. The chairman of the board, as well as the chairman of each committee, receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Independent Accountants’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

Sound Federal Bancorp, Inc.: 

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-104690 and 333-102611) of our report dated April 29, 2003 on the consolidated balance sheets of Sound Federal Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of March 31, 2003 and 2002,and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2003, which report appears in the March 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K ofSound Federal Bancorp, Inc. and refers to a change in accounting for goodwill. 

 

\s\    KPMG LLP 

 

Stamford, Connecticut 

June 25, 2003
#### International Union of Life Insurance Agents, Locals Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Respondents, vs. Wisconsin Labor Relations Board, Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

*March 11*

April *15, 1941.*

*474For the appellant there was a brief by *Lines, Spooner & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Charles B. Quarles*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Quarles.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Gold & McCann*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Ray T. McCann.*

Fritz, J.

The facts in this case are substantially similar to the facts in *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Wisconsin L. R. Board, ante,*p. 464, 297 N. W. 430 (decided herewith), in so far as they are material in the consideration of the legal questions and the conclusions and result reached in that case. In addition to the facts which compelled that result, there are in this case also the circumstances that the proceeding in the circuit court was not instituted by a petition filed by the *employer;*that the only petition filed was by the International Union of Life Insurance Agents, Locals Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and it did not do so until May 2, 1939, which was but two days before the repeal of ch. 111, Stats. 1937; that there never was any service of that petition on the Wisconsin Labor Relations Board because its members had resigned and no board was then in existence; and that there was no pleading filed or appearance in court on behalf of the board.

For the reasons stated in the *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. Case, supra,*the judgment herein must be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the proceedings.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the proceedings.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.9

                             FORM OF ADDENDUM LETTER


                                 August 16, 2001


[Warrant holder name and address]


         Re:      Integral Technologies, Inc.
                  Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated March 15, 2000
                  Temporary Adjustment to Exercise Terms

Dear Warrant Holder:

         In consideration of prevailing overall market conditions, the Board of
Directors of Integral Technologies, Inc. has approved the following temporary
adjustment to the exercise terms of your Warrant:

         If you exercise your Warrant in whole by September 30, 2001, the
exercise price due shall be $.40 per share if both a Notice of Exercise and
payment of the aggregate exercise price (at the rate of $.40 per share) are
received by the Company by September 30, 2001.

         If you do not exercise your Warrant or if payment is not received
September 30, 2001, the exercise price shall revert to $1.80 per share.

         As you are already aware, the shares underlying the Warrant have been
registered for resale by you.

                                         Sincerely,

                                         Integral Technologies, Inc.



                                         William S. Robinson, Chairman
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135260 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. _________________________________________ Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

IN RE ESTATE OF DAVID J. TRUITT, Deceased. 

_________________________________________ 

BETH KIENITZ, Personal Representative of the 

Estate of DAVID J. TRUITT, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 135260 

 COA: 269807 

Menominee PC: 05-000153-CZ 

CAROL J. EISENZOPH,

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
#### Will of Hughes: Hughes, Appellant, vs. Velten, Executor, Respondent.

For the appellant: *J. G. Prueher*of Bloomer.

For the respondent: *Stafford & Stafford*of Chippewa Falls, attorneys, and *Walter C. Velten*of Bloomer of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Orders and judgment affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of hi/fn, inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc..

By: /s/ WILLIAM R. WALKER

Name: William R. Walker
Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of March 31, 1999, and statements of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         964,607
<SECURITIES>                                   194,286
<RECEIVABLES>                                       75
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,231,964
<PP&E>                                         124,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,826)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,435,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,474
<BONDS>                                          6,981
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,170
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,259,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,435,074
<SALES>                                            370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   370
<CGS>                                              247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               291,677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (280,573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (280,573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (280,573)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>