alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 14.1


                              KEY COMPONENTS, LLC

                                 CODE OF ETHICS

         Key Components, LLC expects all of its employees, including its
principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal
accounting officer, as well as the members of its board of directors, to act in
accordance with the highest standards of personal and professional integrity in
all aspects of their activities, to comply with all applicable laws, rules and
regulations, to deter wrongdoing and to abide by other policies and procedures
adopted by Key Components that govern the conduct of its employees and
directors. This Code of Ethics is intended to supplement any other policies and
procedures adopted by Key Components.

         You agree to:

     (a) Engage in and promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical
         handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal
         and professional relationships;

     (b) Take all reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality of
         non-public information about Key Components and its subsidiaries and
         their customers obtained or created in connection with your activities
         and to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of such information unless
         required by applicable law or regulation or legal or regulatory
         process;

     (c) Produce full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in
         reports and documents that Key Components and its subsidiaries files
         with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other
         regulators and in other public communications made by Key Components
         and its subsidiaries;

     (d) Comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations, as
         well as the rules and regulations of self-regulatory organizations of
         which Key Components or its subsidiaries is a member; and

     (e) Promptly report any possible violation of this Code of Ethics to Key
         Components' General Counsel.

         You are prohibited from directly or indirectly taking any action to
fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate or mislead Key Components' or its
subsidiaries' independent public auditors for the purpose of rendering the
financial statements of Key Components or its subsidiaries misleading.

         You understand that you will be held accountable for your adherence to
this Code of Ethics. Your failure to observe the terms of this Code of Ethics
may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of
employment. Violations of this Code of Ethics may also constitute violations of
law and may result in civil and criminal penalties for you, your supervisors
and/or Key Components.

         If you have any questions regarding the best course of action in a
particular situation, you should promptly contact the Chairman of Key
Components' General Counsel. You may choose to remain anonymous in reporting any
possible violation of this Code of Ethics.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Electric City Corp.
Elk Grove Village, Illinois We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8
(Nos. 333-121958 and 333-121959) and S-3 (Nos. 333-123437, 333-117170 and 333-105084) of Electric
City Corp. of our report dated February 11, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule which appears in this Form 10-K/A. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph
regarding the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
June 13, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 54 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 54

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the corporate 
                        alternative minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

    Mr. Kyl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the corporate 
                        alternative minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Corporate Tax Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CORPORATE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX.

    Section 55 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
alternative minimum tax imposed) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(e) Termination.--In the case of a corporation, this section 
shall not apply to taxable years beginning after the date of enactment 
of the Corporate Tax Equity Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### R. G. SNEED v. B. F. BULLOCK.

*Praetiee*— Title *to Pablie Offiee*— Motion.

Title to a public office cannot be tried by *motion.*

*(Jones*v. *Oom’rs of Granville,*ante, 280 ; *Patterson*v. *Hubbs,*65 N. C, 119 ; *Brown*v. *Turner,*70 N. 0. 93, cited and approved.)

Appeal from an .Order made at 'Spring Term, 1877, of ■GeaNville Superior Court, before *Buxton, J.*

The facts appear in the opinion.

*Mr. J. B.*Batchelor, for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Merrimon, Fuller ‡ Ashe*and *T. B. Venable,*for defendant.

Fairclotii, J.

Here we have rather a novel proceeding for trying title to an office, which is the only object of the plaintiff’s appeal.- During a session of the Superior Court, the defendant presents his credentials from the Board of ■County Commissioners, showing that he has been qualified and inducted into the office of Sheriff, so far as said Board • had authority to do so. The Judge after full consideration directed the Clerk to deliver all his future process and precepts to the defendant. The plaintiff, who had been discharging the'duties of said office for some time and still claimed the right to do so, resisted and appealed from said •order to this Court. No action has been instituted, no complaint. or answer filed, and no trial below except as above •stated.

We have held in *Jones*v. *Commissioners of Granville, ante,*280, that title to an-office cannot be tried by an’injunction, .and we now hold that it cannot be tried by' motion. It has been several times declared that the appropriate and precise *283mode of trying title to an office is by an action in the nature of a *quo warranto. Patterson*v. *Hubbs,*65 N. C. 119 ; *Brown*v. Turner, 70 N. C. 93.

Per Cukiam. Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              48
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         359,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 396,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        225,567
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           112
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   396,625
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,063
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,226
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
        

</TABLE>
FALKOR Flight Log Sheet:

Date: Location: Craft: Camera: Pilot: Camera Operator: Shoot: Production Company: Other notable individuals or companies involved (talent, agency, product, etc): Weather: Total number of batteries flown: Equipment Issues: Repairs needed? Flight issues: Followup needed? Contacts met: Other Notes: Flight time logged in pilot flight log?

FALKOR Aerials, 1074 Sunshine Canyon Drive, Boulder, Colorado. falkoraerials.com 303.249.8423
CERTIFICATION  OF CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER AND CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Charles Camorata, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Skreem Entertainment Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Skreem Entertainment
Corporation


By: /s/ Charles Camorata
----------------------------
Name: Charles Camorata
Title: Principal Executive Officer

March 22, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      I, Christopher G. Kenber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of hi/fn, inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc..


                                         By:  /s/ CHRISTOPHER G. KENBER
                                            -----------------------------------
                                         Name: Christopher G. Kenber
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84547-84548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Designation of Chinese Military Company

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and 
Sustainment), Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of addition of a company to the Section 1260H List of 
Chinese Military Companies Operating in the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Deputy Secretary of Defense has determined that the entity 
listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice 
qualifies as a ``Chinese military company'' in accordance with the 
William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Devante Brown (GIES), (703) 695-
8545.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1260H of the William M. (Mac) 
Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 
(Pub. L. 116-283) requires the Secretary of Defense to make additions 
or deletions to the most recent list of ``Chinese military companies'' 
on an ongoing basis based on the latest information. Paragraph (b)(2) 
of this section requires the Secretary of Defense to publish the 
unclassified portion of such list in the Federal Register.
    The Deputy Secretary of Defense has determined that the following 
entity qualifies as a ``Chinese military

[[Page 84548]]

company'' in accordance with Section 1260H:

Hesai Technology Co., Ltd. (Hesai)

    Dated: October 21, 2024.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-24723 Filed 10-21-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
Corrections to “Transcript of ECI/NTSB/FAA Meeting” dated February 14, 2013, Job No. 15494

**Page # Line #**  **Change From Change To** 

2 4b Byron Bryon 2 11b *****ADDITION***** Tubbs, James...DAS/ECI/AEC 3 25 Bryonn Bryon 5 15 Air Parts Airparts 12 14 ACE AEC 15 19 ADEs ADs 15 25 ADEs ADs 26 17 straight shrink 29 16 removal from service. removal of the cylinders from service. 30 17 in at prior to that time frame. in at produced prior to that time frame. 30 20 fillets in early 2006. fillets again inearly 2006. 34 13 fit bit 45 10 CHD CHT 47 19 Rimasen Rumizen 50 17 bed band 54 4 fine find 55 4 Farenheit Fahrenheit 55 4 and it’s M

-Bond 610. and the adhesive is it’s M

-Bond 610. 59 5 22 2.2 59 7 22 2.2 59 17 the cylinders the failed cylinders 66 20 scope scoped 74 2 start building cylinders. start building engine cylinders. 82 17 you’ve got shear strength you’ve got shear deformation strength 95 5 8,000 8 thousandths 103 16 operates operators 112 14 Alcar Alcor 112 15 ETT EGT 112 25 Hunt there Hundere 114 25 TO TBO 122 16 timing, timing problems,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 OF GROVE WORLDWIDE
LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,057
<INVENTORY>                                    175,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               344,601
<PP&E>                                         208,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 726,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          216,811
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       164,289
<OTHER-SE>                                   (176,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   726,135
<SALES>                                        850,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               850,562
<CGS>                                          725,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,036
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (96,652)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (102,907)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          302
<NET-INCOME>                                 (102,605)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 12

- BG

- 1891

IN RE KENNETH SCHNEIDER
, DDN : 2011

- D 465 A Suspended Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

No. 23

- BG

- 00 12

IN RE KENNETH SCHNEIDER
, DDN: 2011

- D465 A Suspended Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 440434

BEFORE: Blackburne

- Rigsby

, Chief Judge , and Easterly and Howard

, Associate Judge s

.

O R D E R (FILED

— April 20, 2023)

On consideration of the certified order from the state of New York disbarring respondent fro m the practice of law by consent ; this court’s February 7, 2023 , order in No. 23

- BG

- 12 maintaining respondent ’s suspension pending final disposition of
t his proceeding and directing h im to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed ; respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit filed in his original disciplinary proceeding in No. 12

- BG

- 1891 on February 11, 20 13 ; and the state ment of Disciplinary Counsel recommending reciprocal discipline and request ing reinstatement be conditioned upon respondent’s successful completion of supervised release and to dismiss No. 12

- BG

- 1891 as moot ; and it appearing that responde nt has not filed a response or opposed the condition for reinstatement ; and it further appearing that respondent was convicted of traveling for the purpose of engaging in sex with a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b)

, it isNo s
. 12

- BG

- 1891 & 23

- BG

- 00 12

ORDERED that Kenneth Schneider is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia , nunc pro tunc to February 11, 2013 . In addition to the other requirements for reinstatement, respondent must successfully complete his period of supervised release imposed as part of his criminal conviction prior to filing a petition for reinstatement in this jurisdiction. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483, 487

- 88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable presumption in favor of imposition of identical discipline and exceptions to t his presumption should be rare) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (stating that the rebuttable presumption of ident ical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the case in No. 12

- BG

- 1891 is hereby dismissed
as moot.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunburst Acquisitions VII, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-KSB  for the period ending June 30, 2006
(the "Report"),  I, Jay Lutsky,  Principal  Executive  Officer of  the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Jay Lutsky
-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
August 5, 2006
EXHIBIT 31.1  RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION  I, Yuan Gang, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of China Junlian Integrated Surveillance, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and the internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions after the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  April 13, 2007 /s/ Yuan Gang Yuan Gang Chief Executive Officer