alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          26,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,611,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,211,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,537,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,266,000
<PP&E>                                       4,109,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,956,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,253,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,348,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,741,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,253,000
<SALES>                                      7,042,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,042,000
<CGS>                                        4,269,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,308,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             242,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                223,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   214,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2:

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James R. Buscemi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|s/ James R. Buscemi    
|-----------------------
|James R. Buscemi       
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|August 1, 2007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------

AIR WISCONSIN AIRLINES CORPORATION -----------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On December 3, 2013, the Department authorized Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation

(“Air Wisconsin”), a U.S. certificated air carrier,1 the use of the trade name “American Eagle”

for one year from the effective date of the merger between American Airlines, Inc., and US 

Airways, Inc. The Department limited the effectiveness of the authorization in light of the fact 

that the trade name American Eagle, was used by American Eagle Airlines, Inc., as well as other 

U.S. air carriers. 

On October 1, 2014, American Airlines, Inc. (“American”), requested that the Department issue 

a new notice without the limiting condition. In support of its request, American states that 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc., has subsequently changed its corporate name to Envoy Air Inc., 

and thus the potential for public confusion no longer exists.2

By this notice, the Department removes the aforementioned limitation placed on Air Wisconsin

and acknowledges the continued use of the trade name “American Eagle” in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C., October 29, 2014.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

 1 Air Wisconsin’s interstate certificate was last reissued by Order 98-7-6, issued July 8, 1998.

2 See Order 2014-4-13, issued April 15, 2014.
Attachment A 

SERVICE LIST FOR AIR WISCONSIN AIRLINES CORPORATION

 MR ALEC BRAMLETT

 MANAGING DIRECTOR

 LEGAL AND GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS

 AMERICAN AIRLINES INC

 

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

 MR RONALD SCOTT

 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

MR MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

 MR PETER LYNCH 

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT 

FAA/AGC-300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.
JESUS AARON BELTRAN-DEL RIO,
Defendant - Appellant. No. 23-3261 (D.C. No. 6:23-CM-60025-EFM-1) (D. Kan.)

________________ _________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________
Before HARTZ
, CARSON , and ROSSMAN , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ In this bail appeal, the parties have filed a joint motion to remand for the

district court to hold a deten tion hearing. We grant the parties’ motion. We remand

for the district court to hold a detention h earing. The mandate sh all issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam

* After examining the briefs and appella te record, this pa nel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not ma terially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cite d, however, for its persuasi ve value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit


### December 29, 2023

Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court Appellate Case: 23-3261 Document: 010110976028 Date Filed: 12/29/2023 Page: 1
#### Will of Messner: Messner, Appellant, vs. Reininger, Respondent.

*650For the appellant: *Sachtjen & Braathen*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Francis C. Quilty,*attorney, and *W. Curtis Farmer*of counsel, both of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit
      32




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report” ), I, Hyung Soon Lee,
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)the
      Report fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934; and





(2)the
      information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May
      16, 2007


/S/
      Hyung
      Soon Lee


Principal
      Executive Officer


Principal
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Tiger Telematics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on his knowledge and belief: 1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


/S/  Michael W. Carrender
----------------------------------------
Michael W. Carrender, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer

September 26, 2005
Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


Clark/Bardes Consulting, Inc. (Delaware)
Clark/Bardes of Massachusetts Insurance Agency, Inc. (Massachusetts)
Clark/Bardes Reinsurance Company Limited (Cayman Islands)
Clark/Bardes of Hawaii, LLC (Hawaii)
Clark/Bardes Financial Services, Inc. (California)
Clark/Bardes of Bermuda, Ltd. (Bermuda)
Wamberg Financial Corporation (Illinois)
CRG Insurance Agency, Inc. (California)
CBC Insurance Revenue Securitization LLC (Delaware)
Clark/Bardes Human Capital Consulting, Inc. (Delaware)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.1.2


                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                       ORBITAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 242 OF THE
                GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

      I, Alan L. Parker, President of Orbital Communications Corporation (the
"Corporation"), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Delaware, do hereby certify as follows:

           The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended
      so that paragraph 5 thereof reads in its entirety as follows:

            5.   The total number of shares of stock that this corporation shall
                 have authority to issue is 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock,
                 $.0l par value per share. Each share of Common stock shall be
                 entitled to one vote.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and the seal of the Corporation
this 22 day of December, 1992.





                                  /s/ ALAN L. PARKER
                                 -------------------------
     [CORPORATE SEAL]            Alan L. Parker, President


ATTEST:


/s/ LESLIE C. SEEMAN
---------------------------
Leslie C. Seeman, Secretary
COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION FOURTI COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT KEITH E. MOTTLE

CHIEF JUSTICE CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER CLERK OF COURT

KAREN ANGELINI 300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200

MARIALYN BARNARD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037

REBECA C. MARTINEZ WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX TELEPHONE

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ (210) 335-2635

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM FACSIMILE NO.

JUSTICES (210)335-2762

March 30,2015

M. Patrick Maguire Steven A. Wadsworth

M. Patrick Maguire, P.C. Assistant District Attorney

945 Barnett St. 216th Judicial District

Kerrville, TX 78028 200 Earl Garrett St., Suite 202

Kerrville, TX 78028

RE: Court of Appeals Numbers: 04-14-003 89-CR and 04-14-00390-CR

Trial Court Case Numbers: 5397 and 5398

Style: Paul Anthony Garcia v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

Enclosed please find the order which the Honorable Court of Appeals has issued

in reference to the above styled and numbered cause.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Margaret It. Adams

Legal Assistant, Fourth Court of Appeals

210.335.3854
RH
______________________________________________________________________________
Robison, Hill & Co.                               Certified Public Accountants
A Professional Corporation                        Brent M. Davies, CPA
                                                  David O. Seal, CPA
                                                  W. Dale Westenskow, CPA
                                                  Barry D. Loveless, CPA
                                                  W. Lamonte Robison, CPA
                                                  E. Morton Hill, CPA


                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors
Geraco, Inc.


     We have issued a report dated July 26, 2001, accompanying the financial
statements of Geraco, Inc.. included in the Registration Statement Form SB-2 and
the related prospectus.

      We consent to the use of this report, as stated above in the Registration
Statement.  We also consent to the use of our name in the statement with respect
to us appearing under the heading "Experts" in the Registration Statement.

Respectfully submitted,



/s/ Robison, Hill & Co.

Salt Lake City, Utah
October 23, 2001








1366 East Murray-Holladay Road, Salt Lake City, Utah 84117-5050
Telephone (801)272-8045   Facsimile (801)277-9942
December 6 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 11

- 00701

- CR
EX PARTE RAHUL SUDHA KAR

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### State, Respondent, vs. Coates, Appellant.

*October 10*—

November *5, 1952.*

*470For the appellant there was a brief by *Vaudreuil & Vau-dreuil*of Kenosha, and oral argument by *Leo E. Vaudreuil.*

For the respondent there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *William A. Plats,*assistant attorney general, and *Edwin M.*Wilkie, special counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Plats*and *Mr. Wilkie.*

Gehl, J.

The entire evidence — that offered by the state as well as that offered by defendant — may be considered. Anno. 17 A. L. R. 925; 2 Wharton, Criminal Evidence (11th ed.), p. 1521, sec. 882.

Count One relates to the acceptance of a bribe at the Nash-Kelvinator plant. It is claimed that there is no testimony that the plant is located in Kenosha county. Defendant testified that he was employed at the Nash-Kelvinator Corporation. A fellow employee called as a character witness by the *471defendant testified that he was employed at Nash-Kelvinator; that he was the “top man” in the *local*(Kenosha) factory. A photostatic copy of defendant’s income-tax return for the year 1947 was introduced in evidence. In it he named Nash-Kelvinator* Corporation, Kenosha, Wisconsin, as his employer. He testified that at the time of the trial he had been employed by the same company for approximately thirty years, from which it follows that his place of employment in 1947, at the time of the offense, was at the plant of Nash-Kelvinator. It it not disputed that the court may take judicial notice that the city of Kenosha is in Kenosha county.

As to the second count, John O’Mara testified that he delivered the money to defendant in the driveway of the latter’s home on Buchanan road. His income-tax return for the year 1947 states his residence to be at 2703 Buchanan road, Kenosha, Wisconsin; in answer to a question contained in the return as to his residence he states it to be “city of Kenosha.” He was a member of the city council of the city of Kenosha when the money was delivered to him. To qualify for that office it was required that he be a resident of the city of Kenosha. Two receipted bills and two applications for certificates of title to an automobile state his residence to be 2703 Buchanan road, Kenosha, Wisconsin. The evidence is sufficient to establish that defendant’s home on Buchanan road was located in the city of Kenosha in Kenosha county.

> “While direct proof of venue should be made, absence of it does not defeat conviction where inference of it may properly be drawn from circumstantial evidence. Where no witness testifies directly to the venue, it is sufficiently proved if there is reference in the evidence to the locality known or probably familiar to the jury where the act constituting the offense was committed from which the jury may reasonably have concluded that the place was in the county alleged. *Kellar v.*State, 174 Wis. 67, 69, 182 N. W. 321; 16 Corp. Jur., p. 769.” *Piper v. State,*202 Wis. 58, 61, 231 N. W. 162.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

****RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS****

I, Lawrence Safarek, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KB of First Niles Financial, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material aspects the consolidated financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

> 
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresas of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> 
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/Lawrence Safarek          Lawrence SafarekVice President and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001002909
<NAME> CHANCELLOR BROADCASTING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,308
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,279
<PP&E>                                          79,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,175,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,193
<BONDS>                                        260,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          414,175
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           190
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,175,723
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,854
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (2)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   247
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,948)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,749
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,432)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.90)
        

</TABLE>