alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. RM2024-9 and N2024-1; Order Nos. 7793 and 7794]
          - RIN 3211-AA39

# AGENCY:

Postal Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Commission is acknowledging that the Postal Service's proposed revisions to its Service Performance Measurement (SPM) Plan for Market Dominant products from Docket No. N2024-1 will be considered as part of Docket No. RM2024-9. This document invites public comments and takes other administrative steps.

# DATES:

*Comments are due:*                         November 20, 2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing Online system at                         *https://www.prc.gov.*                         Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                         section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820.

      ( print page 86381)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notices filed in Docket No. RM2024-9 (Order No. 7793) and Docket No. N2024-1 (Order No. 7794) state that certain proposed revisions to the Postal Service's Service Performance Measurement (SPM) Plan and a related SPM design document, which were filed by the Postal Service pursuant to 39 CFR 3055.5 in pending Docket No. N2024-1, will be considered by the Commission in pending Docket No. RM2024-9. Comments on the proposed revisions should be filed in Docket No. RM2024-9 by November 20, 2024. Any further proposed revisions to the SPM Plan or the SPM design documentation related to the changes in service proposed by the Postal Service in Docket No. N2024-1 should be filed in both Docket No. N2024-1 and Docket No. RM2024-9.

By the Commission.

Jennie L. Jbara,

Primary Certifying Official.

[FR Doc. 2024-25152 Filed 10-29-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
*November 10, 1942.*

#### Kranzusch, Respondent, vs. Fassbender, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Bradford & Derber*of Appleton.

For the respondent: *Benton, Bosser, Becker & Parnell*of Appleton.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
S. 610

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain land under the jurisdiction

of the Bureau of Land Management in Washakie County and Big Horn County,

Wyoming, to the Westside Irrigation District, Wyoming, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—On completion of an environmental analysis

under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.

4321 et seq.), the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the

Director of the Bureau of Land Management (referred to in this

Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’), shall convey to the Westside Irrigation

District, Wyoming (referred to in this Act as ‘‘Westside’’), all right,

title, and interest (excluding the mineral interest) of the United

States in and to such portions of the Federal land in Big Horn

County and Washakie County, Wyoming, described in subsection

(c), as the district enters into an agreement with the Secretary

to purchase.

(b) PRICE.—The price of the land conveyed under subsection

(a) shall be equal to the appraised value of the land, as determined

by the Secretary.

(c) LAND DESCRIPTION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The land referred to in subsection (a)

is the approximately 16,500 acres of land in Big Horn County

and Washakie County, Wyoming, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Westside Project’’ and dated May 9, 2000.

(2) ADJUSTMENT.—On agreement of the Secretary and

Westside, acreage may be added to or subtracted from the

land to be conveyed as necessary to satisfy any mitigation

requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act

of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
S. 610—2

(d) USE OF PROCEEDS.—Proceeds of the sale of land under

subsection (a) shall be deposited in a special account in the Treasury

of the United States and shall be available to the Secretary of

the Interior, without further Act of appropriation, for the acquisition

of land and interests in land in the Worland District of the Bureau

of Land Management in the State of Wyoming that will benefit

public recreation, public access, fish and wildlife habitat, or cultural

resources.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### J. B. TREXLER and wife v. A. H. NEWSOM and wife.

*4Injunction*— Motion *in the Cause*— Practice.

1. An injunction granted before the issuing of the summons in the action is premature.

2. A motion in the cause will not lie where the proceeding shows there were two separate judgments constituting distinct causes of action, as it cannot be seen to which the motion is applicable.

*(Patrick*v. *Joyner,*63 N. C., 573; *McArthur*v. *McEachin,*64 N. C., 72; *Hirsh*v. *Whitehead,*65 N. C., 516, cited and approved).

MotioN to dissolve an injunction, in an action pending in Rowan Superior Court, heard at Chambers in Lexington on the 15th of March, 1883, before *Craves, J.*

In 1875 the defendants obtained two judgments against the plaintiffs before a justice of the peace, one for the sum of $73.49 and costs, upon a claim assigned to them by J. & D. Trexler, and the other for the sum of $39.45 and costs, upon a claim assigned to them by one Hodge. These judgments the defendants caused to be docketed in the superior court on the 3d day of December, 1871, having first had them-revived in the justice’s court. Executions have been issued thereon, and under *14them the sheriff' is threatening to sell certain lands which they say are not subject to be sold, as they are the separate property of the *feme*plaintiff, and thereupon they made application to Judge Gilmer, at Chambers, on the 23d day of February, 1883, for an injunction restraining said sale. .Notice issued to the defendants to show cause why the injunction should not be granted, which notice was made returnable before Judge Graves, at Chambers in Lexington, on the 15th day of March following, and in the meantime the defendants were restrained from selling the premises.

At the time the application was made to Judge Gilmer no summons had been issued in the cause, though one was issued and served four days thereafter.

Judge Graves refused the injunction and vacated the restraining order upon the ground that at the date of the first application there was no summons and consequently no action pending between the parties, from which the plaintiffs appealed.

*Messrs. McCorkle & Kluttz,*for plaintiffs.

*Mr. John S. Henderson,*for defendants.

Ruffin, J.

Besides the express provision of the statute (C. C. P., § 190) that an injunction can only be granted at the commencement of the action, or sometime thereafter, there are several adjudications directly in point and fully sustaining the ruling of the judge. *Patrick*v. *Joyner,*63 N. C., 573; *McArthur v. McEachin,*64 N. C., 72; *Hirsh*v. *Whitehead,*65 N. C., 516.

There are several reasons why we cannot adopt the suggestion of counsel and treat this proceeding as a motion in the cause, and amongst them the insuperable one growing out of the fact that there are two judgments, and therefore two distinct causes pending and but one proceeding, and we cannot tell to which it should be applied.

*15In the opinion of this court the injunction was properly refused, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

No Error'. Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification ofPrincipal Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Joseph Loggia, certifythat:

(1)   Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Advanstar, Inc. (the “registrant”);

(2)   Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [Reserved]

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(d) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

(5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: April 2, 2007 | By:    |   | /s/ Joseph  Loggia      |   |
|---------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                |   |   | Joseph Loggia           |
|                |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
J. Parker Erkmann

T: +1 202 776 2036

perkmann@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

February 20, 2015

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Room W86-3163

Washington, DC 20591

Re: DOT-OST-2013-0034 – Additional Codeshare Notice for B6 and EI

Dear Mr. Gretch:

JetBlue Airways Corporation and Aer Lingus hereby give 30 days’ notice of their intent to 

display Aer Lingus’ designator code EI* on JetBlue flights to and from additional city pairs, as 

required under the action approving the blanket statement of authorization granted on February 

27, 2013. The new city pairs are listed below. The carriers plan to implement this service on or 

about April 30, 2015 for BOS-CLE and May 28, 2015 for JFK-RNO.

JFK-RNO RNO-JFK

BOS-CLE CLE-BOS

Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

J. Parker Erkmann

Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

cc: Service List
February 20, 2015

Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing 30-Day Notice Regarding Additional 

Codesharing Point was served this 20th day of February, 2015 via email transmission on the 

following:

david.herfernan@cozen.com

Jeremy.Ross@alaskaair.com

abigail.donovan@aa.com

howard.kass@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

chris.walker@delta.com

dan.weiss@united.com

Thomas.bolling@united.com

steve.morrissey@united.com

gmurphy@crowell.com

nssparks@fedex.com

anbird@fedex.com

matwood@cozen.com

slachter@cozen.com

jcanny@amerijet.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

Edward.sauer@squiresanders.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com

ldwasko@erols.com

ben.taylor@dot.gov

brett.kruger@dot.gov

brian.hedberg@dot.gov

robert.finamore@dot.gov

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

englets@state.gov

finstonma@state.gov

cristinasa@state.gov

William.stallings@usdoj.gov

info@airlineinfo.com

Erin Combs

114219405
---

---

Exhibit 15.2

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-09840, 333-12146, 333-14238,
333-109874 and 333-118930) of Retalix Ltd. of our report dated July 21, 2006, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Retalix Ltd., included in this Annual Report
(Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/    Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
     A Member of Ernst & Young Global
     Tel Aviv, Israel
     July 2, 2008



---

---
Goran Capital, Inc. - Consolidated
                                                                    Exhibit 11
Analysis of Earnings Per Share
US GAAP - Treasury Method

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Six Months                            Six Months
                                                                     Ended                                 Ended
See Note (1) below                                               June 30, 2000                         June 30, 1999

<S>                                                               <C>                <C>                <C>

Average Price (US $)                                                  N/A                (A)                N/A

Proceeds from Exercise of Warrants and Options (US $)                 Nil                (B)                Nil

Shares Repurchased - Treasury Method                                  Nil             (B) / (A)             Nil

Shares Outstanding - Weighted Average                              5,868,065                             5,876,398

Add:  Options and Warrants Outstanding (1)                            Nil                                   Nil

Less:  Treasury Method - Shares Repurchased                           Nil                                   Nil

Shares Outstanding for US GAAP Purposes                            5,868,065            (C )             5,876,398

Net Earnings in Accordance with US GAAP                          $(8,738,000)            (D)           $(5,716,000)

Earnings (loss) Per Share - US GAAP - Basic                         $(1.49)                               $(0.97)

Earnings (loss) Per Share - US GAAP - Fully Diluted                 $(1.49)          (D) / (C )           $(0.97)

Note 1:  There were no options  outstanding  with a dilutive  effect for the six
months ended June 30, 2000 or 1999.
</TABLE>
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141752) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 23 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141752) and Amendment No. 285 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
















Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 22, 2014
#### Gutknecht, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

*657For the appellant: *Don M. Perry*of Black River Falls, attorney, and *Dorothy Walker*and *Howard W. Latton,*both of Portage of counsel.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *John E. Martin,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondent Martin Wunderlich Company: *Bundlie, Kelley & Finley*of St. Paul, Minnesota, attorneys, and *Wilkie, Toebaas, Hart, Kraege ■& Jackman*of Madison of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3240

To avoid a pay-go sequestration for fiscal year 2001.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 25 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. DOMENICI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1997, to the Committees on

the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one Committee reports, the other Committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

A BILL

To avoid a pay-go sequestration for fiscal year 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAY-GO ADJUSTMENTS.

4 (a) In preparing the final sequestration report re5 quired by section 254(f)(3) of the Balanced Budget and

6 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 for fiscal year

7 2001, in addition to the information required by that sec8 tion, the Director of the Office of Management and Budg9 et shall change any balance of direct spending and receipts
2

S 3240 IS

1 legislation for fiscal year 2001 under section 252 of that

2 Act to zero.

3 (b) Notwithstanding Rule 3 of the Budget

4 Scorekeeping Guidelines set forth in the joint explanatory

5 statement of the committee of conference accompanying

6 Conference Report No. 105–217, legislation enacted in

7 sections 504 and 505 of the Department of Transpor8 tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001,

9 section 312 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act,

10 2001, section 1003 of division B of H.R. 4516 (106th

11 Congress), as enacted, lll that would have been esti12 mated by the Office of Management and Budget as chang13 ing direct spending or receipts under section 252 of the

14 Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of

15 1985 were it included in an Act other than an appropria16 tion Act shall be treated as direct spending or receipts leg17 islation, as appropriate, under section 252 of the Balanced

18 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00597-CR

Louis A. MURPHY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR3342A

Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 7, 2019.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001065310
<NAME> R H DONNELLEY INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,302                      32
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,470                  87,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,298                   4,014
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,679                   7,332
<PP&E>                                          60,712                  55,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,635                  30,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 391,126                 382,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,264                  59,465
<BONDS>                                        464,500                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        12,002                  12,002
<OTHER-SE>                                   (233,612)                 246,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   391,126                 382,286
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,988                 239,865
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,247                 105,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                 (9,412)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,141                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,600                 144,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,040                  59,246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             61,560                  84,905
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    61,560                  84,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.80                    2.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.78                    2.48
        

</TABLE>