alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  

  	
  DM INCORPORATED
  UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE This certifies that CUSIP 24983L 10 4
  SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS is the record holder of FULLY PAID AND
  NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF DERMIRA, INC.
  transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized
  attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This
  Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
  registered by the Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation
  and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated:
  PRESIDENT SECRETARY DELAWARE SEAL DERMIRA, INC. CORPORATE August 18, 2010
  COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC
  (NEW YORK, NY) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

  






 















	
  

  	
  The Corporation
  shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement
  of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating,
  optional or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation or
  series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such
  preferences and/or rights. Such requests shall be made to the Corporation’s
  Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. The following
  abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
  shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
  applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common TEN ENT – as
  tenants by the entireties JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of
  survivorship and not as tenants in common COM PROP – as community property
  UNIF GIFT MIN ACT – Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors
  Act (State) UNIF TRF MIN ACT – Custodian (until age) (Cust) under Uniform
  Transfers (Minor) to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be
  used though not in the above list. FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s)
  unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
  (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)
  shares of the capital stock represented by within Certificate, and do hereby
  irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney-in-fact to transfer the said
  stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of the
  substitution in the premises. Dated X X NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS
  ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE
  CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY
  CHANGE WHATSOEVER. Signature(s) Guaranteed: By THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE
  GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS,
  SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
  APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE
  17Ad-15. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. SIGNATURE
  GUARANTEES MUST NOT BE DATED.
#### Kerr v. Steman.

1. Pleading: fraud: what necessart. Whoever sets up a fraud as a cause of action must do more than allege fraud in general and abstract terms; he must set out the specific facts in which the fraud consists.

*Appeal from Muscatine Oircioit Gourt.*

Tuesday, June 28.

ActioN to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the fraudulent representations of the defendant, by which the plaintiff, Eliza A. Kerr, was induced to sell and convey certain real estate. The defendant moved that the plaintiff be required to make a more specific statement of the facts constituting the fraud. The court sustained the motion. The plaintiff elected to stand upon her petition. Judgment was rendered against her for costs, and she appeals.

*H. J. Lauder*and *P. M. Dettoiler,*for appellant.

Brannan, *Japne &*Hoffman, for appellee.

Adams, Ch. J.

The petition shows clearly enough that the plaintiff was at one time the owner of certain real estate, consisting of a town lot and an undivided third of a tract of forty acres; that she employed the defendant to make an exchange of the same for other property; that he reported that he had negotiated an exchange, stating the terms, and she executed the required conveyances. The petition further *242states that the defendant made a false report, with intent to cheat and defraud her; but wherein the same was false does not appear. She should have set out in what the falsity consisted, in order that the defendant might know what he should come prepared to disprove. The doctrine is elementary that whoever sets up a fraud must do more than allege fraud in general and abstract terms. lie must set out the specific facts in which the fraud consists. The petition in this case seems to us to be clearly insufficient, and we think that the court did not err in sustaining the defendant’s motion for a more specific statement.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 626 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 626

    To provide relief from unfair interest and penalties on refunds 
   retroactively ordered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 1999

 Mr. Roberts (for himself and Mr. Brownback) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide relief from unfair interest and penalties on refunds 
   retroactively ordered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF CERTAIN NATURAL GAS PRODUCERS.

    The Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (15 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 603. LIABILITY OF CERTAIN NATURAL GAS PRODUCERS.

    ``If the Commission orders any refund of any rate or charge made, 
demanded, or received for reimbursement of State ad valorem taxes in 
connection with the sale of natural gas before 1989, the refund shall 
be ordered to be made without interest or penalty of any kind.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Clarence E. Mortell, Appellant, v. Fergus Friel *et al.,*Appellees.

Equity Cause: appeal: affidavits as evidence.

*Appeal from Greene District Court.*— Hon. J. P. Conner, Judge.;

Wednesday, May 25, 1892.

Action to set aside the decree entered in the district court, and cancel a conveyance of land made in pursuance of it. Judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff *appeals.*

Affirmed.

*739*McHenry, Jones & McHenry,*for appellant.

*Perry D. Bose,*and *Howard, & Hoioard,*for appellee.

Granger, J.

The action is to secure a new trial under the provisions of Code, section 3155. The action in which a new trial is sought is one wherein the defendant, Uriel, as guardian of the plaintiff, Clarence E. Mortell, a minor, who brings this action by his next friend, recovered an order of the court for the sale of a part of a certain lot. The petition in this proceeding charges fraud on the part of Friel in obtaining the order of the court to the prejudice of his ward. Issue is taken upon the allegations of the petition, and the cause is before us without question, as an equitable action triable *de novo.*No errors are assigned. At the trial in the district court the plaintiff, to sustain the issues on his part, against the objections of the defendant, put in evidence certain *ex parte*affidavits, . — in fact, the entire 'evidence of plaintiff is by such affidavits. The appellees urge that such affidavits cannot be considered in this court. The appellant does not, in argument, controvert this particular point by the appellee, and we see no escape from the conclusion that the affidavits ■cannot be regarded as competent evidence. The point has an incidental reference in *Carpenter v. Brown,*50 Iowa, 451. By the express language of section 3155, the case “is to be tried as other cases by ordinary proceedings.” This must include the manner of. producing the evidence. It was held, in *Carpenter v. Brown,*that it is not a ease'triable by jury. Actions by ordinary proceedings are not always to be so tried. But issues of fact in ordinary proceedings are determined upon evidence produced, and evidence for that purpose is not to be by affidavit. They are incompetent to sustain such an issue. Disregarding the affidavits, as we must, there is no evidence to support the petition, and it must be dismissed. The record is short, and we have examined it, including the affidavits, and agree with the district court, with the affidavits considered, that the evidence would not justify a decree for the plaintiff. Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees from the Metals and Controls Corp. in Attleboro, Massachusetts, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Grady Calhoun, Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, NIOSH, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 513-533-6800. Information requests can also be submitted by email to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On September 9, 2024, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384*l*                    (14)(C), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:                

All atomic weapons employees who worked at Metals and Controls Corp. in Attleboro, Massachusetts, from January 1, 1968, through September 21, 1995, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the SEC.

This designation became effective on October 9, 2024. Therefore, beginning on October 9, 2024, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC.

*Authority:*2 U.S.C. 384q(b). 42 U.S.C. 7384*l*                    (14)(C).                

John J. Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2024-24833 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
I, Lindsay Gorrill, the President, CEO and Chief Financial Officer of Star Gold Corp. (the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  December 14, 2009/s/Lindsay GorrillBy:Lindsay GorrillPresident, CEOand Chief Financial Officer
#### JACKSON B. HARE v. JAMES W. GRANT Administrator.

*Surety and Principal*— Action *by Surety*— Measure *of Damages.*

Where a surety is sued with his principal, or where he is sued alone and notifies his principal, the recovery against the surety is the measure of damages in an action by surety against principal for money paid to his use, and the record of such recovery is conclusive against the principal in such action.

*(Lewis*v. *Foi't,*75 N. 0. 251, cited and approved.)

Civil ActioN tried at Spring Term, 1877, of NORTHAMPTON Superior Court, before *Buxton, J.*

James Clark the intestate of defendant was the guardian of one James P. Harrell, and the plaintiff was surety on his guardian bond. The plaintiff alleged that in an action brought on this bond by Harrell, he was compelled to pay the amount demanded as due to the ward, as appeared by a return of said guardian made in 1851. At the trial term of said action, a *nolle prosequi*was entered as to the administrator of the deceased 'guardian, and judgment rendered against this plaintiff. This action was brought to recover back the money paid by the surety for his principal, and when the case was called for trial, the defendant’s counsel moved for a continuance on the ground that the defendant was absent, and that he, the counsel, was informed that defendant had in his possession vouchers showing payments made by said guardian to his ward after the guardian’s last return, which- was made on the 23d of May, 1859. The Court refused the motion to continue and the defendant excepted. The plaintiff introduced the transcript of certain court records, execution, &c., showing that he had paid the debt, and under the instructions of His Honor the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff. Judgment. Appeal by defendant.

*204
      *Messrs. D. A. Barnes*and *W. N. H. Smith,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. B. B. Peebles*and *W. W.*Peebles, for defendant.

Read®, J.

Where a surety is sued with his principal, or' where he is sued alone and notifies his principal, so as to enable him to defend, or to furnish the surety with a de-fence, the recovery against' the surety is the measure of his damages against his principal. And in an action, as this is,, to recover of his principal, money paid to his use, the record of the recovery against the surety is conclusive evidence.

It would be iniquitous for the principal to stand by and see an excessive recovery against his surety, which he alone could prevent, and then set up the defence when his surety sues him.

Of course this principle would not apply where there was' fraud or collusion between the surety and creditor. And probably it would not apply where there had been *negligence-on*the part of the surety in using the defences within his-power, or which were furnished him by the principal. In this case no fault attaches to the surety. *Lewis*v. Fort, 75 N. C. 251.

There is no error.

PER Curiam. , Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86790-86791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25269]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Savannah 
River Site; Correction

AGENCY: Office of Environmental Management, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 23, 2024, the Department of Energy published a 
notice of open meeting announcing a meeting on November 18-19, 2024, of 
the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), 
Savannah River Site. This document makes a location correction to that 
notice resulting from the availability of the meeting location impacted 
by the recent hurricane.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Tanner, Office of External 
Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Savannah River Operations 
Office, P.O. Box A, Aiken, SC 29802; Phone: (803) 646-2167; or Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e141f131b0d500a1f10101b0c3e0d0c0d50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="513b303c34227f25303f3f3423112223227f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction

    In the Federal Register of October 23, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-24573, 
on page 84557, starting in the second column, correct the ADDRESSES 
caption to read:
ADDRESSES: Augusta Marriott at the Convention Center, 2 10th Street, 
Augusta, GA 30901. The meeting will also be streamed on YouTube, no 
registration is necessary; links for the livestream can be found on the 
following website: https://cab.srs.gov/srs-cab.html.
    Signing Authority: This document of the Department of Energy was 
signed on October 25, 2024, by Alyssa Petit, Deputy Committee 
Management Officer, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary 
of Energy. That document with the original signature and date is 
maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance 
with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the 
undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to 
sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as 
an official document of

[[Page 86791]]

the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way alters 
the legal effect of this document upon publication in the Federal 
Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on October 25, 2024.
Jennifer Hartzell,
Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2024-25269 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<pre>

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Ludlum
Construction Co., Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10 K-SB of the Company for the
annual period ended December 31, 2003 , as amended,
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.

              				/s/   FLOYD D. WILKENSON
						          ---------------------------
              				Floyd D. Wilkenson
			      	        Authorized Agent/Sole Director
			      	        Appointed by Board of Directors on
                      March 19, 2004

Dated:  December 22, 2004



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 the undersigned officer of Ludlum
Construction Co., Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10 K-SB of the Company for the
annual period ended December 31, 2003 , as amended, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.

              				/s/   FLOYD D. WILKENSON
						          ---------------------------
              				Floyd D. Wilkenson
			      	        Authorized Agent/Sole Director
			      	        Appointed by Board of Directors on
                      March 19, 2004

Dated:  December 22, 2004