alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WTP Sim 316b mean tri.txt

File Name: WTP Sim 316b mean tri.do Author: Robert Johnston, Clark University Created: 8/27/2009 Purpose: Stata do-file used to estimate the WTP model for nonuse benefits transfer.

clear set matsize 200 set mem 400m set more off insheet using covb_316btri.txt mkmat ne acres migrant access catch ibi wild cost nsne nsacres nsmigrant nsaccess nscatch nsibi nswild tscost, matrix(covmat) insheet using betas_316btri.txt, clear mkmat ne acres migrant access catch ibi wild cost nsne nsacres nsmigrant nsaccess nscatch nsibi nswild tscost, matrix(beta) drawnorm ne1 acres1 migrant1 access1 catch1 ibi1 wild1 cost1 nsne1 nsacres1 nsmigrant1 nsaccess1 nscatch1 nsibi1 nswild1 tscost1, n(1000) cov(covmat) means(beta) seed(999) clear generate n=1000 expand n generate migrant2 = (migrant1 + nsmigrant*invnormal(uniform())) generate m = cost1 generate l = 0 generate u = 2*cost1 generate r = uniform() generate cost2 = l + sqrt((m-l)*(u-l)*r) if r<=0.5 replace cost2 = u - sqrt((u-m)*(u-l)*(1-r)) if r>0.5 generate wtp_migrant = (migrant2)/cost2 summarize migrant2, detail summarize cost2, detail by cost1, sort: egen wtp_migrant_mean = mean(wtp_migrant) collapse wtp_migrant_mean, by(cost1) summarize wtp_migrant_mean, detail

Page 1
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                               MOVIE GALLERY, INC.

     Movie  Gallery,  Inc.  (the  "Corporation"),  a  corporation  organized and
existing  under  and by virtue of the  General  Corporation  Law of the State of
Delaware, does hereby certify:

     1.  That  at a  meeting  of the  board  of  directors  of the  Corporation,
resolutions  were  duly  adopted  setting  forth  a  proposed  amendment  to the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation,  declaring said amendment to be
advisable  and  calling a meeting of the  stockholders  of the  Corporation  for
consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
follows:

          Resolved, that the Certificate of Incorporation of the  Corporation be
     amended by  changing  the first  paragraph of  Article  Fourth  so that, as
     amended, Article Fourth shall be and read as follows:

          "1. The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock, to be
     designated  "Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock,"  respectively.  The total
     number of shares which the  Corporation is authorized to issue is sixty-two
     million   (62,000,000)  shares.  The  number  of  shares  of  Common  Stock
     authorized to be issued is sixty million (60,000,000),  with a par value of
     $0.001 per share.  The number of shares of Preferred Stock authorized to be
     issued is two million (2,000,000), with a par value of $0.10 per share."

     2. That  thereafter,  pursuant to resolution of its board of directors,  an
annual meeting of the  stockholders of the Corporation was duly called and held,
upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by
statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

     3. That said  amendment was duly adopted in accordance  with the provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     4. That the  capital of the  Corporation  shall not be reduced  under or by
reason of said amendment.

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Corporation  has  caused  this  Certificate  of
Amendment to be signed by H. Harrison  Parrish,  its President and S. Page Todd,
its secretary this 6th day of June, 1996.



                                 /s/  H. Harrison Parrish
                                 -------------------------------
                                 H. Harrison Parrish, President



                                 /s/ S. Page Todd
                                 -------------------------------
                                 S. Page Todd, Secretary
### Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = LGA Holder = 0001(Exclude) Status Date = 01/01/2009 (Current & Future) 10/19/2009 10:57:44



### Query Parameters:

### 10/19/2009 10:57:44

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Holders) Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2009 (Current & Future)

LGA
157 AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 43 ACA AIR CANADA 14 AMT ATA AIRLINES (AMERICAN TRANS AIR prior to 9 CJC COLGAN AIRWAYS 34 COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 8 COM COMAIR AIRLINES 222 DAL DELTA AIR LINES 84 EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 6 FFT FRONTIER AIRLINES 15 JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 18 MEP MIDWEST AIRLINES (MIDWEST EXPRESS 22 NKS SPIRIT AIRLINES 48 NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 9 PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 22 TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 60 UAL UNITED AIRLINES 381 USA US AIRWAYS

Page 2
1 

### Gurdoglanyan, Nicole

From: Rosa, Yesenia LTC MIL NG NGB ARNG [Yesenia.Rosa@us.army.mil]

Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 10:00 AM

To: GovernmentAffairs

Re: Docket No. DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2012

‐ 0029

Dear Secretary LaHood:

I am writing today to express my strong support for JetBlue’s application to offer new

beyond

‐ perimeter service at Reagan National and link the nation’s capital to two other

important capital cities: San Juan, Puerto Rico (connecting onward to St. Thomas, the capital

of the U.S. Virgin Islands) and Austin, Texas.

JetBlue’s application will provide much

‐ needed low

‐ fare, high

‐ quality service from the

capital’s downtown airport to the capital of our closest territory, and to the capital of the

largest of the contiguous 48 states. Both San Juan and Austin are crying out for new JetBlue

service to DCA, being two of the ten largest markets without nonstop air service to the

airport. Their application will bring tremendous public benefit and much

‐ needed low

‐ fare

competition to DCA.

Please join me in offering your support for JetBlue’s application.

My name is LTC Yesenia Rosa Reyes

My city and state are Alexandria, VA

My e

‐ mail address is yesenia.rosa@us.army.mil
INTERIM RESPONSE ACTION (IRA) SUMMARY REPORT Chemical Process Related Activities Final

September 2000 Jointly developed and written by the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Region 8, and the U.S. Army, Rocky MountainArsenal 6959-1/1-H 1111111111111111111111 00021650
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 388

To authorize the establishment of a disaster mitigation pilot program in

the Small Business Administration.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 8, 1999

Mr. CLELAND (for himself, Mr. KERRY, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. CONRAD, Mrs.

BOXER, Mr. DASCHLE, and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To authorize the establishment of a disaster mitigation pilot

program in the Small Business Administration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISASTER MITIGATION PILOT PROGRAM.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(b)(1) of the Small Busi5 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)) is amended—

6 (1) in subparagraph (B), by adding ‘‘and’’ at

7 the end; and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(C) during fiscal years 2000 through 2004, to

10 establish a predisaster mitigation program to make
2

•S 388 IS

1 such loans (either directly or in cooperation with

2 banks or other lending institutions through agree3 ments to participate on an immediate or deferred

4 (guaranteed) basis), as the Administrator may deter5 mine to be necessary or appropriate, to enable small

6 businesses to use mitigation techniques in support of

7 a formal mitigation program established by the Fed8 eral Emergency Management Agency, except that no

9 loan or guarantee may be extended to a small busi10 ness under this subparagraph unless the Administra11 tion finds that the small business is otherwise unable

12 to obtain credit for the purposes described in this

13 subparagraph;’’.

14 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

15 20 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is

16 amended by adding at the end the following:

17 ‘‘(f) DISASTER MITIGATION PILOT PROGRAM.—The

18 following program levels are authorized for loans under

19 section 7(b)(1)(C):

20 ‘‘(1) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2000.

21 ‘‘(2) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2001.

22 ‘‘(3) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2002.

23 ‘‘(4) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.

24 ‘‘(5) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2004.’’.
3

•S 388 IS

1 (c) EVALUATION.—On January 31, 2003, the Admin2 istrator of the Small Business Administration shall submit

3 to the Committees on Small Business of the House of Rep4 resentatives and the Senate a report on the effectiveness

5 of the pilot program authorized by section 7(b)(1)(C) of

6 the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C)), as

7 added by subsection (a) of this section, which report shall

8 include—

9 (1) information relating to—

10 (A) the areas served under the pilot pro11 gram;

12 (B) the number and dollar value of loans

13 made under the pilot program; and

14 (C) the estimated savings to the Federal

15 Government resulting from the pilot program;

16 and

17 (2) such other information as the Administrator

18 determines to be appropriate for evaluating the pilot

19 program.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q for quarter ending March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,321
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,207
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,370
<INVENTORY>                                      6,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,777
<PP&E>                                         442,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 501,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,482
<BONDS>                                        224,848
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   501,473
<SALES>                                         83,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,521
<CGS>                                           65,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,056
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,787
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
#### Elizabeth Kistner and George Kistner, Appellants, *v*. J. E. Conery.

Assignment of Errors: appeal on certificate. Code, section 4136, providing that no question shall be considered by the supreme court in an ordinary action, unless pointed out by an assignment of error, applies to cases coming up on certificate, especially, as under existing law the certificate need not point out the exact question to be decided.

*Appeal from Blaclchawlc District Court.*— Hon. EraNKliN 0. Platt, Judge.

Friday, October 20, 1899.

ActioN of mandamus to compel defendant, who is a justice of tbe peace, to allow an appeal. Tbe trial court sustained a demurrer to tbe petition, and plaintiffs appeal.—

*Dismissed.*

*H. H. Bezold*for appellants.

*No appearance*for appellee.

Per Oubia:m:.i

Tbe case comes to us on a certificate from tbe trial judge wbicb contains a copy of tbe petition filed by tbe plaintiffs, and of tbe demurrer interposed by defendant, and tbe following record made by tbe court: “Demurrer to'petition submitted and sustained, and plaintiffs except.” There is no statement that plaintiffs elected to stand on tbeir petition, or that any judgment bas been rendered against them. There is no assignment of error, and tbe only showing with reference to- tbe appeal is, “Appeal to tbe supreme court according to- law,” following tbe certificate of tbe judge. While tbe new Code, section 4110, dispenses with many things theretofore required in a certificate for appeal where tbe amount in controversy is less than one *440hundred dollars, yet it does not dispense with assignments of error and other matters essential to a proper presentation of appeals to this court. It must appear that we have jurisdiction, and that the questions presented are not merely moot or abstract ones; and Code, section 4136, expressly provides that no' question, shall be considered by this court in an ordinary action, unless pointed out by an assignment of error. This statute should be applied to cases coming to us on certificate; for, as the new Code does not require the-exact questions to be certified, there is more reason for holding an assignment of error necessary than there was under the Code of 1813.' "Whether an assignment was necessary under the Code of 1813 is left undecided in *Bank v.*Pot*torfe,*96 Iowa, 354, although it is intimated that an assignment is essential to a proper presentation of the appeal'. There is nothing for us to consider, and the appeal is ms-missed.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY 

GLOBAL ACCESS FOR AMERICA

6 Feb 2013

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC-10

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3OF

 5901 Air Guard Dr.

 Bldg 1001, Box 34

 Oklahoma City, OK 73179

SUBJECT: 14 CFR Exemption 4371 Renewal (Regulatory Docket FAA-2000-8093)

1. FAA Exemption 4371 was granted to the United States Air Force on 21 Jun 85; as amended 

to 4371L on 6 May 2011, it exempts USAF aircraft from the provisions of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regualtions § 91.177(a)(2) and 91.179(b)(1). The requirement for USAF aircraft to 

conduct low-level operations without complying with en route minimum altitudes for flight 

under instrument flight rules (IFR) or direction of flight requirements for IFR en route segments 

in uncontrolled airspace remains unchanged. 

2. On behalf of the USAF, we hereby request an extension IAW 14 CFR Part 11 until 31 July 

2016. The conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety presented in the original 

and subsequent petitions (upon which the exemption was granted) also remain unchanged. 

2. Please contact me at (405) 734-8424 or hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil if there are any questions 

of concerns. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

WILLIAM D. HART, Lt Col, USAF

Chief, Flight Directives Division
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeremiah Flynn, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 578]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Griffin, J.), rendered July 22, 2002, convicting him of assault in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00410-CR

Daniel Veley, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CR-08-211383, HONORABLE DAVID CRAIN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was due November 19, 2009. The brief has not been received, no

extension of time has been requested, and appellant’s retained attorney, John L. Fritz, did not

respond to this Court’s notice that the brief is overdue.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations.

A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court

reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no

later than February 26, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Abated

Filed: January 28, 2010

Do Not Publish
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.47

            ATTACHING TO AND FORMING PART OF POLICY NO. 901/LK9905081

                      ISSUED BY: SWISS REINSURANCE COMPANY

               TO: MEDICAL INTER-INSURANCE EXCHANGE OF NEW JERSEY



ENDORSEMENT NO. 1                                   EFFECTIVE: 1ST JANUARY, 2000


It is hereby understood and agreed that with effect from 1st January, 2000 this
Contract is amended as follows:

i)      Article IV B. Limit Excess of Retention is amended to read:

        Limit Excess of Retention:

        i)      In respect of Medical and Dental Practitioner Liability,
                Umbrella Liability, Hospital and other Healthcare Institution
                Professional Liability and Commercial Liability Business:

                Reinsurers shall be liable for 90% of $25,000,000 of Ultimate
                Net Loss as respects each original policy, or, where applicable,
                each and every Event, plus Pro rata Loss Adjustment Expenses.

        ii)     In respect of Directors and Officers Liability, Fiduciary
                Liability, Managed Care Errors and Omissions Liability,
                Employment Practice Liability, and Miscellaneous Professional
                Indemnity (including but not limited to Lawyers Professional,
                Notary Public and Electronic Data Processors Business--coverage
                subject to agreement by Reinsurers):

                Reinsurers shall be liable for 90% of $15,000,000 of Ultimate
                Net Loss as respects each original policy, or, where applicable,
                each and every Event, plus Pro rata Loss Adjustment Expenses.

ii)     Article VIII: Premium is amended to read:

        The Company shall pay the Reinsurers a Minimum and Deposit Premium which
        is to be agreed upon receipt and review of (a) schedule of accounts
        ceded under the contract for the period: 12 months at 1st January, 1999
        and (b) I.L.F. allocations for the reduced limit of $25,000,000 and
        shall be payable quarterly as follows:-

        31st March, 30th June, 30th September and 31st December.

        The Minimum Premium shall be adjusted upwards at 90% of the net ceded
        premium within 45 days of 31st December.

iii)    This Contract reinsures 80% part of the 90% of the Limit of Liability
        expressed hereunder.



All other terms and conditions of this Contract remain unaltered.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 453

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 709 West 9th

Street in Juneau, Alaska, as the ‘‘Hurff A. Saunders

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 453 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HURFF A. SAUNDERS FED2 ERAL BUILDING.

3 The Federal building located at 709 West 9th Street

4 in Juneau, Alaska, shall be known and designated as the

5 ‘‘Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

10 a reference to the ‘‘Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building’’.

Passed the Senate March 23, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 453

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 709

‘‘Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building’’.West 9th Street in Juneau, Alaska, as the
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 452 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 Private Calendar No. 7
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 452

                          [Report No. 106-364]


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 1999

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            October 5, 1999

       Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
                  For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Belinda 
McGregor shall be held and considered to have been selected for a 
diversity immigrant visa for fiscal year 2000 as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Belinda McGregor, or any child (as 
defined in section 101(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act) of 
Belinda McGregor, enters the United States before the date of the 
enactment of this Act, he or she shall be considered to have entered 
and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for 
adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Belinda McGregor as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by one number during the current fiscal year the 
total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(c) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(c)).

            Passed the Senate August 5, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
                                     





                                                 Private Calendar No. 7

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 452

                          [Report No. 106-364]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

                  For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 5, 1999

       Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed`