[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84983-84998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24739]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE


Grant Guideline; Notice

AGENCY: State Justice Institute.

ACTION: Grant guideline for fiscal year (FY) 2025.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This guideline sets forth the administrative, programmatic, 
and financial requirements attendant to FY 2025 State Justice Institute 
grants.

DATES: October 2, 2024.

ADDRESSES: State Justice Institute, 12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340, 
Fairfax, VA 22033.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Mattiello, Executive 
Director, State Justice Institute, 703-660-4979, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8c2c7c6c9dcc0c9c686c5c9dcdcc1cdc4c4c7e8dbc2c186cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="355f5a5b54415d545b1b585441415c5059595a75465f5c1b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the State Justice Institute Act 
of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10701 et seq.), the State Justice Institute is 
authorized to award grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts to 
State and local courts, nonprofit organizations, and others for the 
purpose of improving the quality of justice in the State courts of the 
United States.
    The following Grant Guideline is adopted by the State Justice 
Institute for FY 2025.

Table of Contents

I. Eligibility
II. Grant Application Deadlines
III. The Mission of the State Justice Institute
IV. Grant Types
V. Application and Submission Information
VI. How To Apply
VII. Post-Award Reporting Requirements
VIII. Compliance Requirements
IX. Financial Requirements
X. Grant Adjustments

I. Eligibility

    Pursuant to the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
10701 et seq.), the State Justice Institute (SJI) is authorized to 
award grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts to State and local 
courts, national nonprofit organizations, and others for the purpose of 
improving the quality of justice in the State courts of the United 
States.
    SJI is authorized by Congress to award grants, cooperative 
agreements, and contracts to the following entities and types of 
organizations:
    <bullet> State and local courts and their agencies (42 U.S.C. 
10705(b)(1)(A)).
    <bullet> National nonprofit organizations controlled by, operating 
in conjunction with, and serving the judicial branches of State 
governments (42 U.S.C. 10705(b)(1)(B)).
    <bullet> National nonprofit organizations for the education and 
training of judges and support personnel of the judicial branch of 
State governments (42 U.S.C. 10705(b)(1)(C)). An applicant is 
considered a national education and training applicant under section 
10705(b)(1)(C) if:
    [ssquf] the principal purpose or activity of the applicant is to 
provide education and training to State and local judges and court 
personnel; and
    [ssquf] the applicant demonstrates a record of substantial 
experience in the field of judicial education and training.
    <bullet> Other eligible grant recipients (42 U.S.C. 10705 (b)(2)(A) 
through (D)).
    [ssquf] Provided that the objectives of the project can be served 
better, SJI is also authorized to make awards to:
    [cir] Nonprofit organizations with expertise in judicial 
administration
    [cir] Institutions of higher education
    [cir] Individuals, partnerships, firms, corporations (for-profit 
organizations must waive their fees)
    [cir] Private agencies with expertise in judicial administration
    [ssquf] SJI may also make awards to State or local agencies and 
institutions other than courts for services that cannot be adequately 
provided through nongovernmental arrangements (42 U.S.C. 10705(b)(3)).
    SJI is prohibited from awarding grants to Federal, Tribal, and 
international courts.

II. Grant Application Deadlines

    The SJI Board of Directors makes awards on a Federal fiscal year 
quarterly basis. Applications may be submitted at any time but will be 
considered for award based only on the timetable below.

      Table 1--Application Deadlines by Federal Fiscal Year Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Federal fiscal year quarter              Application due date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1........................................  November 1.
2........................................  February 1.
3........................................  May 1.
4........................................  August 1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To be considered timely, an application must be submitted by the 
application deadline noted above. Applicants must use the SJI Grants 
Management System (GMS) to submit all applications and post-award 
documents. The SJI GMS is accessible at https://gms.sji.gov. SJI urges 
applicants to submit applications at least 72 hours prior to the 
application due date to allow time for the applicant to receive an 
application acceptance message and to correct in a timely fashion any 
problems that may arise, such as missing or incomplete forms.
    Questions related to the SJI Grant Program or the SJI GMS should be 
directed to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#385b57564c595b4c784b5251165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="583b37362c393b2c182b3231763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>.

III. The Mission of the State Justice Institute

    The State Justice Institute Authorization Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
10701 et seq.) established SJI to improve the administration of justice 
in the State courts of the United States. Incorporated in the State of 
Virginia as a private, nonprofit corporation, SJI is charged, by 
statute, with the responsibility to:
    <bullet> direct a national program of financial assistance designed 
to ensure that each citizen of the United States is provided ready 
access to a fair and effective system of justice;
    <bullet> foster coordination and cooperation with the Federal 
judiciary;
    <bullet> promote recognition of the importance of the separation of 
powers doctrine to an independent judiciary; and
    <bullet> encourage education for judges and support personnel of 
State court systems through national and state organizations.
    To accomplish these broad objectives, SJI is authorized to provide 
funding to State courts, national organizations that support and are 
supported by State courts, national judicial education organizations, 
and other organizations that can assist in improving the quality of 
justice in the State courts.
    Through the award of grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements, 
SJI is authorized to perform the following activities:
    <bullet> support technical assistance, demonstrations, special 
projects, research, and training to improve the administration of 
justice in the State courts;
    <bullet> provide for the preparation, publication, and 
dissemination of information regarding State judicial systems;
    <bullet> participate in joint projects with Federal agencies and 
other private grantors;
    <bullet> evaluate or provide for the evaluation of programs and 
projects to determine their impact upon the quality of criminal, civil, 
and juvenile justice and the extent to which they have

[[Page 84984]]

contributed to improving the quality of justice in the State courts;
    <bullet> encourage and assist in furthering judicial education; and
    <bullet> encourage, assist, and serve in a consulting capacity 
State and local courts in the development, maintenance, and 
coordination of criminal, civil, and juvenile justice programs and 
services.
    SJI is supervised by a board of directors appointed by the U.S. 
President, with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate. The SJI 
Board of Directors is statutorily composed of six judges; a State court 
administrator; and four members of the public, no more than two of the 
same political party. Additional information about SJI, including a 
list of members of the SJI Board of Directors, is available at https://www.sji.gov.

a. Priority Investment Areas

    The SJI Board of Directors has established Priority Investment 
Areas for grant funding. SJI will allocate significant financial 
resources through grant-making for these Priority Investment Areas. The 
Priority Investment Areas are applicable to all grant types. SJI 
strongly encourages potential grant applicants to consider projects 
addressing one or more of these Priority Investment Areas and to 
integrate the following factors into each proposed project:
    <bullet> evidence-based, data-driven decision making;
    <bullet> cross-sector collaboration;
    <bullet> systemic approaches (as opposed to standalone programs);
    <bullet> institutionalization of new court processes and 
procedures;
    <bullet> ease of replication; and
    <bullet> sustainability.
    For FY 2025, the Priority Investment Areas are listed below in no 
specific order.
1. Opioids and Other Dangerous Drugs and Behavioral Health Responses
    <bullet> Behavioral Health Disparities--Research indicates that 
justice-involved persons have significantly greater proportions of 
mental, substance use, and co-occurring disorders than are found in the 
public. SJI supports cross-sector collaboration and information sharing 
that emphasizes policies and practices designed to improve court 
responses to justice-involved persons with behavioral health and other 
co-occurring needs.
    <bullet> Trauma-Informed Approaches--Judges, court staff, system 
stakeholders, and court-involved persons (e.g., defendants, 
respondents, and victims) alike may be impacted by prior trauma. This 
is particularly, but not exclusively, true for those with mental 
illness and/or substance use disorders. SJI supports trauma-informed 
training, policies, and practices in all aspects of the judicial 
process.
2. Promoting Access to Justice and Procedural Fairness
    <bullet> Self-Represented Litigation--SJI promotes court-based 
solutions to address increases in self-represented litigants; helps 
make courts more user-friendly by simplifying court forms; provides 
one-on-one assistance; develops guides, handbooks, and instructions on 
how to proceed; develops court-based self-help centers; and uses 
internet technologies to increase access. These projects are improving 
outcomes for litigants and saving valuable court resources.
    <bullet> Language Access--SJI supports language access in the State 
courts through remote interpretation (i.e., outside the courtroom), 
interpreter training and certification, courtroom services (plain 
language forms, websites, etc.), and addressing the requirements of 
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) and 
the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (34 U.S.C. 10101 et 
seq.).
    <bullet> Procedural Fairness--A fundamental role of courts is to 
ensure fair processes and just outcomes for litigants. SJI promotes the 
integration of research-based procedural fairness principles, policies, 
and practices into State court operations to increase public trust and 
confidence in the court system, reduce recidivism, and increase 
compliance with court orders.
3. Reducing Disparities and Protecting Victims, Underserved, and 
Vulnerable Populations
    <bullet> Disparities in Justice--SJI supports research and data-
driven approaches that examine statutory requirements, policies, and 
practices that result in disparities for justice-involved persons. 
These disparities can be because of inequities in socioeconomic, 
racial, ethnic, gender, age, health, or other factors. In addition to 
identifying disparities, SJI promotes systemic approaches to reducing 
disparities.
    <bullet> Human Trafficking--SJI addresses the impact of Federal and 
State human-trafficking laws on the State courts and the challenges 
faced by State courts in dealing with cases involving trafficking 
victims and their families. These efforts are intended to empower State 
courts to identify victims, link them with vital services, and hold 
traffickers accountable.
    <bullet> Rural Justice--Rural areas and their justice systems 
routinely have fewer resources and more barriers--such as 
unavailability of services, lack of transportation, and smaller 
workforces--than their urban counterparts. Programs and practices that 
are effective in urban areas are often inappropriate and/or lack 
supported research for implementation in rural areas. SJI supports 
rural courts by identifying promising and best practices and promoting 
resources, education, and training opportunities that are uniquely 
designed for rural courts and court users.
    <bullet> Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Elder Issues--SJI 
assists courts in improving court oversight of guardians and 
conservators for the elderly and incapacitated adults through visitor 
programs, electronic reporting, and training.
4. Advancing Justice Reform
    <bullet> Criminal Justice Reform--SJI assists State courts in 
taking a leadership role in reviewing fines, fees, and bail practices 
to ensure processes are fair and access to justice is assured; 
implements alternative forms of sanction; develops processes for 
indigency review; promotes transparency, governance, and structural 
reforms that promote access to justice, accountability, and oversight; 
and implements innovative diversion and reentry programs that serve to 
improve outcomes for justice-involved persons and the justice system.
    <bullet> Juvenile Justice Reform--SJI supports innovative projects 
that advance best practices in handling dependency and delinquency 
cases, promote effective court oversight of juveniles in the justice 
system, address the impact of trauma on juvenile behavior, assist the 
courts in identification of appropriate provision of services for 
juveniles, and address juvenile reentry.
    <bullet> Family and Civil Justice Reform--SJI promotes court-based 
solutions for the myriad of civil case types, such as domestic 
relations, housing, employment, and debt collection, which are 
overwhelming court dockets.
5. Transforming Courts
    <bullet> Courthouse and Judicial Security--In the current climate 
of increasing threats to judicial officers and acts of courthouse 
violence being committed across the nation, many State and local courts 
are focusing more attention and resources on court and judicial 
security. SJI has long recognized the need to assist State and local 
courts in

[[Page 84985]]

improving the personal safety of judges, court personnel, and the 
public.
    <bullet> Emergency Response and Recovery--Courts must be prepared 
for natural disasters and public health emergencies and 
institutionalize the most effective and efficient practices and 
processes that evolve during response and recovery. SJI supports 
projects that look to the future of judicial service delivery by 
identifying and replicating innovations and alternate means of 
conducting court business due to public health emergencies, such as 
pandemics and natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes, and 
wildfires).
    <bullet> Cybersecurity--Courts must also be prepared for 
cyberattacks on court systems, such as denial of service and ransomware 
attacks on court case management systems, websites, and other critical 
information technology infrastructure. SJI supports projects that 
assist courts in preparing for and responding to these attacks and 
shares lessons learned to courts across the United States.
    <bullet> Technology--Courts must integrate technological advances 
into daily judicial processes and proceedings. SJI supports projects 
that institutionalize innovative technology that has successfully 
advanced the use of electronic filing and payment systems, online 
dispute resolution, remote work, and virtual court proceedings. SJI 
promotes projects that streamline case filing and management processes, 
thereby reducing time and costs to litigants and the courts; provide 
online access to courts to litigants so that disputes can be resolved 
more efficiently; and make structural changes to court services that 
enable them to evolve into an online environment. Additionally, SJI 
supports the examination of potential integration of artificial 
intelligence (AI) into court processes, including identification of 
positive outcomes and potential limitations of AI.
    <bullet> Strategic Planning--Courts must rely on a deliberate 
process to determine organizational values, mission, vision, goals, and 
objectives. SJI promotes structured planning processes and 
organizational assessments to assist courts in setting priorities, 
allocating resources, and identifying areas for ongoing improvements in 
efficiency and effectiveness. Strategic planning includes elements of 
court governance, data collection, management, analysis, sharing, and 
sustainable court governance models that drive decision making. 
Strategic plans and outcomes must be communicated to judges, court 
staff, justice partners, and the public.
    <bullet> Training, Education, and Workforce Development--State 
courts require a workforce that is adaptable to public demands for 
services. SJI supports projects that focus on the tools needed to 
enable judges, court managers, and staff to be innovative, forward-
thinking court leaders.

IV. Grant Types

    SJI supports five types of grants: Project, Technical Assistance 
(TA), Curriculum Adaptation and Training (CAT), Strategic Initiatives 
Grants (SIG) Program, and the Education Support Program (ESP). A brief 
description of each type of grant is below.

a. Project Grant

    Project grants are intended to support innovative education and 
training, research and evaluation, demonstration, and TA projects that 
can improve the administration of justice in State courts locally or 
nationwide. State court and national nonprofit applicants may request 
up to $300,000 for 36 months. Local court applicants may request up to 
$200,000 for 24 months. Examples of expenses not covered by project 
grants include the salaries or benefits of full- or part-time court 
employees. Funding may not be used for the ordinary, routine operations 
of court systems.
    All applicants for project grants must contribute a cash match 
greater than or equal to the SJI award amount. This means that grant 
awards by SJI must be matched at least dollar for dollar by grant 
applicants. For example, an applicant seeking a $300,000 Project Grant 
must provide a cash match of at least $300,000. Applicants may 
contribute the required cash match directly or in cooperation with 
third parties. Funding from other Federal departments or agencies may 
not be used for a cash match.

b. TA Grant

    TA grants are intended to provide State or local courts--or 
regional court associations--with sufficient support to obtain expert 
assistance to diagnose a problem, develop a response to that problem, 
and implement any needed changes. TA grants may not exceed $75,000 or 
12 months in duration. In calculating project duration, applicants are 
cautioned to fully consider the time required to issue a request for 
proposals, negotiate a contract with the selected provider, and execute 
the project. Funds may not be used for salaries or benefits of full- or 
part-time court employees.
    Applicants for TA grants must contribute a total match (cash and 
in-kind) of no less than 50 percent of the SJI award amount, of which 
20 percent must be cash. For example, an applicant seeking a $75,000 TA 
Grant must provide a $37,500 match, of which up to $30,000 can be in-
kind and not less than $7,500 must be cash. Funding from other Federal 
departments and agencies may not be used for a cash match.

c. CAT Grant

    CAT grants are intended to: (1) enable courts or national court 
associations to modify and adapt model curricula, course modules, or 
conference programs to meet States' or local jurisdictions' educational 
needs; train instructors to present portions or all of the curricula; 
and pilot-test them to determine their appropriateness, quality, and 
effectiveness; or (2) conduct judicial branch education and training 
programs, led by either expert or in-house personnel, designed to 
prepare judges and court personnel for innovations, reforms, and/or new 
technologies recently adopted by grantee courts. CAT grants may not 
exceed $40,000 or 12 months in duration. Examples of expenses not 
covered by CAT grants include the salaries or benefits of full- or 
part-time court employees.
    Applicants for CAT grants are required to contribute a total match 
(cash and in-kind) of not less than 50 percent of the SJI award amount, 
of which 20 percent must be cash. For example, an applicant seeking a 
$40,000 CAT grant must provide a $20,000 match, of which up to $16,000 
can be in-kind and not less than $4,000 must be cash. Funding from 
other Federal departments and agencies may not be used for a cash 
match.

d. SIG Program

    The SIG Program provides SJI with the flexibility to address 
national court issues as they occur and develop solutions to those 
problems. This is an innovative approach where SJI uses its expertise 
and the expertise and knowledge of its grantees to address key issues 
facing State courts across the United States.
    The funding is used for grants or contractual services and is 
handled at the discretion of the SJI Board of Directors and staff. SJI 
requires the submission of a concept paper prior to the full 
application process. Only applicants that submit an approved concept 
paper will be invited to submit a full application for funding. 
Potential applicants are strongly encouraged to contact SJI prior to 
submitting a concept paper for guidance on this initial step.

[[Page 84986]]

e. ESP for Judges and Court Managers

    The ESP is intended to enhance the skills, knowledge, and abilities 
of State court judges and court managers by enabling them to attend 
out-of-state or enroll in online educational and training programs 
sponsored by national and State providers they could not otherwise 
attend or take online because of limited State, local, and personal 
budgets. The program covers only the cost of tuition up to a maximum of 
$1,000 per course.
    The ESP is administered by the National Judicial College (NJC) and 
the National Center for State Courts (NCSC)/Institute for Court 
Management (ICM), in partnership with SJI. For NJC courses, register 
online at https://www.judges.org/courses. For ICM courses, register 
online at https://www.ncsc.org/education-and-careers/icm-courses. 
During the respective registration processes, each website will ask 
whether a scholarship is needed to participate. Follow the online 
instructions to request tuition assistance.

V. Application and Submission Information

    This section describes in detail what an application must include. 
An applicant should anticipate that if he or she fails to submit an 
application that contains all the specified project components, it may 
negatively affect the review of the application. Applicants must use 
the SJI GMS to submit all applications and post-award documents. The 
SJI GMS is accessible at https://gms.sji.gov.

a. Application Components

    Applicants for SJI grants must submit the following forms and/or 
documents via the SJI GMS:
1. Application Form
    The application form requests basic information regarding the 
proposed project, the applicant, and the total amount of funding 
requested from SJI. It also requires the signature of an individual 
authorized to certify on behalf of the applicant that the information 
contained in the application is true and complete; submission of the 
application has been authorized by the applicant; and, if funding for 
the proposed project is approved, the applicant will comply with the 
requirements and conditions of the award, including the assurances set 
forth in in section V.A.4, Assurances of this guideline.
2. Certificate of State Approval
    An application from a State or local court must include a copy of 
the Certificate of State Approval signed by the State's chief justice 
or State court administrator. The signature denotes that the proposed 
project has been approved by the State's highest court or the agency or 
council it has designated. Further, the signature denotes, if 
applicable, a cash match reduction has been requested, and that if SJI 
approves funding for the project, the court or the specified designee 
will receive, administer, and be accountable for the awarded funds.
3. Budget Form
    Applicants must provide a detailed budget and a budget narrative 
providing an explanation of the basis for the amounts in each budget 
category. If funds from other sources are required to conduct the 
project, either as a match or to support other aspects of the project, 
the source, current status of the request, and anticipated decision 
date must be provided.
4. Assurances
    The Assurances form lists the statutory, regulatory, and policy 
requirements with which recipients of SJI funds must comply.
5. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
    Applicants other than units of State or local government are 
required to disclose whether they, or another entity that is part of 
the same organization as the applicant, have advocated a position 
before Congress on any issue, and to identify the specific subjects of 
their lobbying efforts.
6. Project Abstract
    The abstract must highlight the purposes, goals, methods, and 
anticipated benefits of the proposed project. It must not exceed one 
single-spaced page and must be uploaded on the ``Attachments'' tab in 
the SJI GMS.
7. Program Narrative
    The program narrative for an application may not exceed 25 double-
spaced pages on 8\1/2\- by 11-inch paper with 1-inch margins, using a 
standard 12-point font. The pages must be numbered. This page limit 
does not include the forms, the abstract, the budget narrative, or any 
additional attachments. The program narrative must address the 
following, noting any specific areas to address by grant type:
    i. Statement of Need. Applicants must explain the critical need 
they are facing and how SJI funds will enable them to meet this 
critical need. The applicants must also explain why State or local 
resources are not sufficient to fully support the costs of the project.
    Applicants must provide a verified source for the data (i.e., 
Federal, State, and local databases) that supports the problem 
statement. The discussion must include specific references to the 
relevant literature and to experience in the field. SJI continues to 
make all grant reports and most grant products available online through 
the NCSC Library and Digital Archive. Applicants must conduct a search 
of the NCSC Library and Digital Archive on the topic areas they are 
addressing. This search must include SJI-funded grants and previous 
projects not supported by SJI. Searches for SJI grant reports and other 
State court resources begin with the NCSC Library section. Applicants 
must discuss the results of their research, how they plan to 
incorporate the previous work into their proposed project, and if the 
project will differ from prior work.
    ii. Project Grants. If the project is to be conducted in any 
specific location(s), applicants must discuss the particular needs of 
the project site(s) the project would address and why existing 
programs, procedures, services, or other resources do not meet those 
needs.
    If the project is not site-specific, the applicants must discuss 
the problems that the proposed project would address and why existing 
programs, procedures, services, or other resources cannot adequately 
resolve those problems. In addition, applicants must describe how, if 
applicable, the project will be sustained in the future through 
existing resources.
    iii. TA Grants. Applicants must explain why State or local 
resources are unable to fully support the modification and presentation 
of the model curriculum. The applicants must also describe the 
potential for replicating or integrating the adapted curriculum in the 
future using State or local funds once it has been successfully adapted 
and tested. In addition, applicants must describe how, if applicable, 
the project will be sustained in the future through existing resources.
    iv. CAT Grants (curriculum adaptation). Applicants must explain why 
State or local resources are unable to fully support the modification 
and presentation of the model curriculum. The applicants must also 
describe the potential for replicating or integrating the adapted 
curriculum in the future using State or local funds once it has been 
successfully adapted and tested.
    v. CAT Grants (training). Applicants must describe the court reform 
or initiative prompting the need for

[[Page 84987]]

training. Applicants must also discuss how the proposed training will 
help them implement planned changes at the court and why State or local 
resources are not sufficient to fully support the costs of the required 
training.
    vi. SIGs. Applicants must detail the origin of the project (i.e., 
requested by SJI or a request to SJI) and provide a detailed 
description of the issue of national impact the proposed project will 
address, including any evaluations, reports, resolutions, or other data 
to support the need statement.

b. Project Description and Objectives

    The applicants must include a clear, concise statement of what the 
proposed project is intended to accomplish and how those objectives 
will be met. Applicants must delineate the tasks to be performed in 
achieving the project objectives and the methods to be used for 
accomplishing each task.
    Applicants must describe how the proposed project addresses one or 
more Priority Investment Areas. If the project does not address one or 
more Priority Investment Areas, the applicants must provide an 
explanation as to the reason.
1. Application Details by Project Type
i. Project Grants. The applicants must include detailed descriptions of 
tasks, methods, and evaluations. For example:
    <bullet> Research and evaluation projects. The applicants must 
include the data sources, data collection strategies, variables to be 
examined, and analytic procedures to be used for conducting the 
research or evaluation and ensuring the validity and general 
applicability of the results. For projects involving human subjects, 
the discussion of methods must address the procedures for obtaining 
respondents' informed consent, ensuring the respondents' privacy and 
freedom from risk or harm, and protecting others who are not the 
subjects of research but would be affected by the research. If the 
potential exists for risk or harm to human subjects, a discussion must 
be included that explains the value of the proposed research and the 
methods to be used to minimize or eliminate such risk. Refer to section 
VIII.R.3, Human Subject Protection of this guideline for additional 
information.
    <bullet> Education and training projects.The applicants must 
include the adult education techniques to be used in designing and 
presenting the program, including the teaching and learning objectives 
of the educational design, the teaching methods to be used, and the 
opportunities for structured interaction among the participants. The 
opportunities applicants must include are: how faculty would be 
recruited, selected, and trained; the proposed number and length of the 
conferences, courses, seminars, or workshops to be conducted and the 
estimated number of persons who would attend them; the materials to be 
provided and how they would be developed; and the cost to participants.
    <bullet> Demonstration projects. The applicants must include the 
demonstration sites and the reasons they were selected or, if the sites 
have not been chosen, how they would be identified; how the applicants 
would obtain the cooperation of demonstration sites; and how the 
program or procedures would be implemented and monitored.
    <bullet> TA projects. The applicants must explain the types of 
assistance that would be provided, the particular issues and problems 
for which assistance would be provided, the type of assistance 
determined, how suitable providers would be selected and briefed, and 
how reports would be reviewed.
    ii. TA Grants. Applicants must identify which organization or 
individual will be hired to provide the assistance and how the 
consultant was selected. The applicants must describe the tasks the 
consultant will perform and how the tasks will be accomplished.
    If a consultant has not yet been identified, the applicants must 
describe the procedures and criteria that will be used to select the 
consultant (applicants are expected to follow their jurisdictions' 
normal procedures for procuring consultant services).
    If the consultant has been identified, the applicants must provide 
a letter from that individual or organization documenting interest in 
and availability for the project, as well as the consultant's ability 
to complete the assignment within the proposed timeframe and for the 
proposed cost. The consultant must agree to submit a detailed written 
report to the court and SJI upon completion of the TA. Applicants must 
then describe the steps that have been or will be taken to facilitate 
implementation of the consultant's recommendations upon completion of 
the technical assistance.
    The applicants must then address the following questions:
    <bullet> What specific tasks will the consultant and court staff 
undertake?
    <bullet> What is the schedule for completion of each required task 
and the entire project?
    <bullet> How will the applicant oversee the project and provide 
guidance to the consultant, and who at the court or regional court 
association would be responsible for coordinating all project tasks and 
submitting Quarterly Progress and Financial Status Reports?
    iii. CAT Grants (curriculum adaptation). The applicants must 
provide the title of the curriculum that will be adapted and identify 
the entity that originally developed the curriculum. Applicants must 
allow at least 90 days between the potential award date and the date of 
the proposed program to allow sufficient time for planning. This period 
should be reflected in the project timeline. The applicants must also 
address the following questions:
    <bullet> Why is this education program needed at the present time?
    <bullet> What are the project's goals?
    <bullet> What are the learning objectives of the adapted 
curriculum?
    <bullet> What program components would be implemented, and what 
types of modifications, if any, are anticipated in length, format, 
learning objectives, teaching methods, or content?
    <bullet> Who would be responsible for adapting the model 
curriculum?
    <bullet> Who would the participants be, how many would there be, 
how would they be recruited, and from where would they come (e.g., from 
a single local jurisdiction, from across the state, from a multistate 
region, from across the nation, etc.)?
    The applicants must also provide the proposed timeline, including 
the project start and end dates, the date(s) the judicial branch 
education program will be presented, and the process that will be used 
to modify and present the program. Applicants must also identify who 
will serve as faculty, and how they will be selected, in addition to 
the measures taken to facilitate subsequent presentations of the 
program.
    iv. CAT Grants (training). The applicants must identify the tasks 
the trainer will be expected to perform, which organization or 
individual will be hired, and, if in-house personnel are not the 
trainer, how the trainer will be selected.
    If a trainer has not yet been identified, the applicants must 
describe the procedures and criteria that will be used to select the 
trainer.
    If the trainer has been identified, the applicants must provide a 
letter from that individual or organization documenting interest in and 
availability for the project, as well as the trainer's ability to 
complete the assignment within the proposed timeframe and for the 
proposed cost.
    In addition, the applicants must address the following questions:

[[Page 84988]]

    <bullet> What specific tasks would the trainer and court staff or 
regional court association members undertake?
    <bullet> What presentation methods will be used?
    <bullet> What is the schedule for completion of each required task 
and the entire project?
    <bullet> How will the applicant oversee the project and provide 
guidance to the trainer, and who at the court or affiliated with the 
regional court association would be responsible for coordinating all 
project tasks and submitting Quarterly Progress and Financial Status 
Reports?
    <bullet> The applicant must explain what steps have been or will be 
taken to coordinate the implementation of the training. For example, if 
the support or cooperation of specific court, regional court 
association officials, committees, other agencies, funding bodies, 
organizations, or a court other than the applicant will be needed to 
adopt the reform and initiate the proposed training, how will the 
applicant secure their involvement in the development and 
implementation of the training?
    v. SIGs. The applicants should expand upon the project description 
and objectives described in the approved concept paper. All feedback 
and questions submitted by the SJI Board of Directors and staff during 
the review of the concept paper should also be incorporated into the 
project design.
2. Dissemination Plan
    The application must: (1) explain how and to whom the products 
would be disseminated; describe how they would benefit the State 
courts, including how they could be used by judges and court personnel; 
(2) identify development, production, and dissemination costs covered 
by the project budget; and (3) present the basis on which products and 
services developed or provided under the grant would be offered to the 
court community and the public at large (i.e., whether products would 
be distributed at no cost to recipients, or if costs are involved, the 
reason for charging recipients and the estimated price of the product). 
Ordinarily, applicants must schedule all product preparation and 
distribution activities within the project period.
    The type of product to be prepared depends on the nature of the 
project. For example, in most instances, the products of a research, 
evaluation, or demonstration project must include: (1) an article 
summarizing the project findings that is publishable in a journal 
serving the courts community nationally, (2) an executive summary that 
would be disseminated to the project's primary audience, or (3) both an 
article and executive summary. Applicants proposing to conduct 
empirical research or evaluation projects with national import must 
describe how they would make their data available for secondary 
analysis after the grant period.
    The curricula and other products developed through education and 
training projects must be designed for use by others and again by the 
original participants in the course of their duties. Applicants 
proposing to develop web-based products must provide, for sending, a 
notice and description of the document (i.e., a written report with a 
reference to the website) to the appropriate audiences to alert them to 
the availability of the website or electronic product.
    Applicants must submit a final draft of all written grant products 
to SJI for review and approval at least 30 days before the products are 
submitted for publication or reproduction. Applicants must provide 
multimedia products for SJI review at the treatment, script, rough-cut, 
and final stages of development, or their equivalents. No grant funds 
may be obligated for publication or reproduction of a final grant 
product without the written approval of SJI. Project products should be 
submitted to SJI electronically in HTML or PDF format.
    Applicants must also include in all project products a prominent 
acknowledgment that SJI provided support and a disclaimer paragraph 
such as, ``This [document, film, videotape, etc.] was developed under 
[grant/cooperative agreement] number SJI-[insert number] from the State 
Justice Institute. The points of view expressed are those of the 
[author(s), filmmaker(s), etc.] and do not necessarily represent the 
official position or policies of the State Justice Institute.'' The 
``SJI'' logo must appear on the front cover of a written product or in 
the opening frames of a website or other multimedia products, unless 
SJI approves another placement. The SJI logo can be downloaded from 
SJI's website (https://www.sji.gov) at the bottom of the ``Grants'' 
page.
3. Staff Capability and Organizational Capacity
    An applicant that is not a State or local court and has not 
received a grant from SJI within the past 3 years must indicate whether 
it is either: (1) a national nonprofit organization controlled by, 
operating in conjunction with, and serving the judicial branches of 
State governments, or (2) a national nonprofit organization for the 
education and training of State court judges and support personnel. If 
the applicant is a nonjudicial unit of Federal, State, or local 
government, it must explain whether the proposed services could be 
adequately provided by nongovernmental entities.
    Applicants that have not received a grant from SJI within the past 
3 years must include a statement describing their capacity to 
administer grant funds, including the financial systems used to monitor 
project expenditures (and income, if any), a summary of their past 
experience in administering grants, and any resources or capabilities 
they have that would particularly assist in the successful completion 
of the project.
    Unless requested otherwise, an applicant that has received a grant 
from SJI within the past 3 years must describe only the changes in its 
organizational capacity, tax status, or financial capability that may 
affect its capacity to administer a grant. If the applicant is a 
nonprofit organization (other than a university), it must also provide 
documentation of its 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status as determined by the 
Internal Revenue Service and a copy of a current certified audit 
report. For the purpose of this requirement, ``current'' means no 
earlier than 2 years prior to the present calendar year.
    The applicant must include a summary of key staff members' and 
consultants' training and experience that qualify them to conduct and 
manage the proposed project. Resumes of identified staff should be 
attached to the application. If one or more key staff members and 
consultants are not known at the time of the application, a description 
of the criteria that would be used to select people for these positions 
should be included. The applicant must also identify the person who 
would be responsible for managing and reporting on the financial 
aspects of the proposed project.
4. Evaluation
    Projects must include an evaluation plan to determine whether the 
project has met its objectives. The evaluation must be designed to 
provide an objective and independent assessment of the effectiveness or 
usefulness of the training or services provided; the impact of the 
procedures, technology, or services tested; or the validity and 
applicability of the research conducted. The evaluation plan must be 
appropriate to the type of project proposed, considering the nature, 
scope, and magnitude of the project.

[[Page 84989]]

5. Sustainability
    Describe how the project will be sustained after SJI assistance 
ends. The sustainability plan must describe how current collaborations 
and evaluations will be used to leverage ongoing resources. SJI 
encourages applicants to ensure sustainability by coordinating with 
local, State, and other Federal resources.

c. Budget and Matching State Contribution

    Applicants must complete a budget in the SJI GMS and upload a 
budget narrative. The budget narrative must provide the basis for all 
project-related costs and the sources of any match, as required. The 
budget narrative must thoroughly and clearly describe every category of 
expense listed. SJI expects proposed budgets to be complete, cost 
effective, and allowable (i.e., reasonable, allocable, and necessary 
for project activities).
    1. Prohibited Uses of SJI Funds. To ensure that funds made 
available are used to supplement and improve the operation of State 
courts, rather than to support basic court services, funds shall not be 
used:
    <bullet> To supplant State or local funds supporting a program or 
activity (e.g., paying the salary of court employees who would be 
performing their normal duties as part of the project or paying rent 
for space that is part of the court's normal operations).
    <bullet> To construct court facilities or structures.
    <bullet> Solely to purchase equipment.
    Examples of basic court services include:

<bullet> Hiring of personnel
<bullet> Purchase and/or maintenance of equipment
<bullet> Purchase of software and/or licenses
<bullet> Purchase of internet access or service
<bullet> Supplies to support the day-to-day operations of courts

    The final determination of what constitutes basic court services is 
made by SJI and is not negotiable.
    Meals and refreshments are not allowable costs.
    Trinkets (e.g., items such as hats, mugs, portfolios, T-shirts, 
coins, gift bags, gift cards, etc.) may not be purchased with SJI grant 
funding.
    2. Justification of Personnel Compensation. The applicants must set 
forth the amount of time the individuals who would staff the proposed 
project would devote, the annual salary of each of those persons, and 
the number of workdays per year used to calculate the amount of time or 
daily rates of those individuals. The applicants must explain any 
deviations from current rates or established written organizational 
policies. No grant funds or cash match may be used to pay the salary 
and related costs for a current or new employee of a court or other 
unit of government because such funds would constitute a supplantation 
of State or local funds in violation of 42 U.S.C. 10706(d)(1); this 
includes new employees hired specifically for the project. The salary 
and any related costs for a current or new employee of a court or other 
unit of government may only be accepted as an in-kind match.
    3. Fringe Benefit Computation. For nongovernmental entities, 
applicants must provide a description of the fringe benefits provided 
to employees. If percentages are used, the authority for such use 
should be presented, as well as a description of the elements included 
in the determination of the percentage rate.
    4. Consultant/Contractual Services and Honoraria. The applicants 
must describe the tasks each consultant would perform, the estimated 
total amount to be paid to each consultant, the basis for compensation 
rates (e.g., the number of days multiplied by the daily consultant 
rates), and the method for selection. Prior written SJI approval is 
required for any consultant rate in excess of $800 per day; SJI funds 
may not be used to pay a consultant more than $1,100 per day. 
Honorarium payments must be justified in the same manner as consultant 
payments.
    5. Travel. Transportation costs and per diem rates must comply with 
the policies of the applicant organization. If the applicant does not 
have an established travel policy, then travel rates must be consistent 
with those established by the Federal Government. The budget narrative 
must include an explanation of the rate used, including the components 
of the per diem rate and the basis for the estimated transportation 
expenses. The purpose of the travel must also be included in the 
narrative.
    6. Equipment. Grant funds may be used to purchase only the 
equipment necessary to demonstrate a new technological application in a 
court or that is otherwise essential to accomplishing the objectives of 
the project. In other words, grant funds cannot be used strictly for 
the purpose of purchasing equipment. Equipment purchases to support 
basic court operations will not be approved. Applicants must describe 
the equipment to be purchased or leased and explain why the acquisition 
of that equipment is essential to accomplish the project's goals and 
objectives. The narrative must clearly identify which equipment is to 
be leased and which is to be purchased. The method of procurement must 
also be described.
    7. Supplies. Applicants must provide a general description of the 
supplies necessary to accomplish the goals and objectives of the grant. 
In addition, the applicants must provide the basis for the amount 
requested for this expenditure category.
    8. Construction. Construction expenses are prohibited.
    9. Postage. Anticipated postage costs for project-related mailings, 
including distribution of the final product(s), should be described in 
the budget narrative. The cost of special mailings, such as for a 
survey or for announcing a workshop, should be distinguished from 
routine mailing costs. The bases for all postage estimates should be 
included in the budget narrative.
    10. Printing/Photocopying. Anticipated costs for printing or 
photocopying project documents, reports, and publications must be 
included in the budget narrative, along with the bases used to 
calculate these estimates.
    11. Indirect Costs. Indirect costs are only applicable to 
organizations that are not State courts or government agencies. 
Recoverable indirect costs are limited to no more than 75 percent of a 
grantee's direct personnel costs (i.e., salaries plus fringe benefits). 
Applicants must describe the indirect cost rates applicable to the 
grant in detail. If costs often included within an indirect cost rate 
are charged directly (e.g., a percentage of the time of senior managers 
to supervise project activities), the applicants should specify that 
these costs are not included within their approved indirect cost rate. 
If an applicant has an indirect cost rate or allocation plan approved 
by any Federal granting agency, a copy of the approved rate agreement 
must be attached to the application.
    12. Matching Requirements. SJI grants require a match, which is the 
portion of project costs not borne by SJI and includes both cash and 
in-kind matches as outlined in this paragraph. A cash match is the 
direct outlay of funds by the grantee or a third party to support the 
project. Other Federal department and agency funding may not be used 
for a cash match. An in-kind match consists of contributions of time 
and/or services of current staff members, new employees, space, 
supplies, etc., that are made to the project by the grantee or others 
(e.g., advisory board members) working directly on the project. An in-
kind match can also consist of that portion of the grantee's federally

[[Page 84990]]

approved indirect cost rate that exceeds the limit of permitted charges 
(75 percent of salaries and benefits).
    The grantee is responsible for ensuring that the total amount of 
the match proposed is contributed. If a proposed contribution is not 
fully met, SJI may reduce the award amount accordingly, to maintain the 
ratio originally provided for in the award agreement. The match should 
be expended at the same rate as SJI funding.
    i. Project Grants. Applicants for Project grants must contribute a 
cash match greater than or equal to the SJI award amount. This means 
that grant awards by SJI must be matched at least dollar for dollar by 
grant applicants. For example, an applicant seeking a $300,000 Project 
grant must provide a cash match of at least $300,000. Applicants may 
contribute the required cash match directly or in cooperation with 
third parties.
    ii. TA Grants. Applicants for TA grants are required to contribute 
a total match (cash and in-kind) of no less than 50 percent of the SJI 
award amount, of which 20 percent must be cash. For example, an 
applicant seeking a $75,000 TA grant must provide a $37,500 match, of 
which up to $30,000 can be in-kind and not less than $7,500 must be 
cash.
    iii. CAT Grants. Applicants for CAT grants are required to 
contribute a total match (cash and in-kind) of not less than 50 percent 
of the SJI award amount, of which 20 percent must be cash. For example, 
an applicant seeking a $40,000 CAT grant must provide a $20,000 match, 
of which up to $16,000 can be in-kind and not less than $4,000 must be 
cash. Funding from other Federal departments and agencies may not be 
used for a cash match.
    iv. SIGs. State and local courts and non-court units of government 
must provide a dollar-for-dollar cash match for SIG projects. Matching 
funds may not be required for SIG projects that are awarded to non-
court or nongovernmental entities.
    13. Letters of Support. Written assurances of support or 
cooperation should accompany the application letter if the support or 
cooperation of agencies, funding bodies, organizations, or courts other 
than the applicant would be needed in order for the consultant to 
perform the required tasks. Applicants may also submit memorandums of 
agreement or understanding, as appropriate.
    14. Project Timeline. A project timeline detailing each project 
objective, activity, expected completion date, and responsible person 
or organization should be included. The plan should include the 
starting and completion date for each task; the time commitments to the 
project of key staff and their responsibilities regarding each project 
task; and the procedures that would ensure that all tasks are performed 
on time, within budget, and at the highest level of quality. In 
preparing the project timeline, applicants must make certain that all 
project activities, including publication or reproduction of project 
products and their initial dissemination, would occur within the 
proposed project period. The project timeline must also provide for the 
submission of Quarterly Progress and Financial Status Reports within 30 
days after the close of each calendar quarter, as well as submission of 
all final closeout documents. The project timeline may be included in 
the program narrative or provided as a separate attachment.
    15. Other Attachments. Resumes of key project staff may also be 
included. Additional background material should be attached only if it 
is essential to impart a clear understanding of the proposed project. 
Numerous and lengthy appendices are strongly discouraged.

d. Application Review Information

    1. Selection Criteria. In addition to the criteria detailed below, 
SJI will consider whether the applicant is a State or local court, a 
national court support or education organization, a non-court unit of 
government, or other type of entity eligible to receive grants under 
SJI's enabling legislation; the availability of financial assistance 
from other sources for the project; the diversity of subject matter; 
geographic diversity; the level and nature of the match that would be 
provided; reasonableness of the proposed budget; the extent to which 
the proposed project would also benefit the Federal courts or help 
State or local courts enforce Federal constitutional and legislative 
requirements; and the level of appropriations available to SJI in the 
current year and the amount expected to be available in succeeding 
fiscal years, when determining which projects to support.
    2. Project Grant Applications. Project grant applications will be 
rated based on the criteria set forth below:
    <bullet> Soundness of the methodology.
    <bullet> Demonstration of need for the project.
    <bullet> Appropriateness of the proposed evaluation design.
    <bullet> If applicable, the key findings and recommendations of the 
most recent evaluation and the proposed responses to those findings and 
recommendations.
    <bullet> Applicant's management plan and organizational 
capabilities.
    <bullet> Qualifications of the project's staff.
    <bullet> Products and benefits resulting from the project, 
including the extent to which the project will have long-term benefits 
for State courts across the nation.
    <bullet> Degree to which the findings, procedures, training, 
technology, or other results of the project can be transferred to other 
jurisdictions.
    <bullet> Reasonableness of the proposed budget.
    <bullet> Demonstration of cooperation and support of other agencies 
that may be affected by the project.
    3. TA Grant Applications. TA grant applications will be rated based 
on the following criteria:
    <bullet> Whether the assistance would address a critical need of 
the applicant.
    <bullet> Soundness of the technical assistance approach to the 
problem.
    <bullet> Qualifications of the consultant(s) to be hired or the 
specific criteria that will be used to select the consultant(s).
    <bullet> Commitment of the court or association to act on the 
consultant's recommendations.
    <bullet> Reasonableness of the proposed budget.
    4. CAT Grant Applications. CAT grant applications will be rated 
based on the following criteria:
    <bullet> Goals and objectives of the proposed project.
    <bullet> How the training would address a critical need of the 
court or association.
    <bullet> Need for outside funding to support the program.
    <bullet> Soundness of the approach in achieving the project's 
educational or training objectives.
    <bullet> Integration of distance learning and technology in project 
design and delivery.
    <bullet> Qualifications of the trainer(s) to be hired or the 
specific criteria that will be used to select the trainer(s) (training 
project only).
    <bullet> Likelihood of effective implementation and integration of 
the modified curriculum into the State or local jurisdiction's ongoing 
educational programming (curriculum adaptation project only).
    <bullet> Commitment of the court or association to the training 
program (training project only).
    <bullet> Expressions of interest by judges and/or court personnel, 
as demonstrated by letters of support.
    5. SIG Applications. SIG applications will be rated based on the 
following criteria:
    <bullet> Goals and objectives of the proposed project.
    <bullet> Demonstration of need for the project.
    <bullet> Degree to which the project addresses a current national 
court issue.

[[Page 84991]]

    <bullet> Level of innovation in addressing the identified need.
    <bullet> Potential impact on the court community.
    <bullet> Qualifications of the consultant(s) engaged to manage the 
project.
    6. Review Process. SJI reviews the application to make sure that 
the information presented is reasonable, understandable, measurable, 
and achievable, as well as consistent with this guideline. Applications 
must meet basic minimum requirements. Although specific requirements 
may vary by grant type, the following are common requirements 
applicable to all SJI grant applications:
    <bullet> Must be submitted by an eligible type of applicant.
    <bullet> Must request funding within funding constraints of each 
grant type (if applicable).
    <bullet> Must be within statutorily allowable expenditures.
    <bullet> Must include all required forms and documents.
    <bullet> The SJI Board of Directors reviews all applications and 
makes final funding decisions. The decision to fund a project is solely 
that of the SJI Board of Directors.
    7. Notification of SJI Board of Directors Decision. The Chairman of 
the Board signs grant awards on behalf of SJI. SJI will notify 
applicants regarding the SJI Board of Directors' decisions to award, 
defer, or deny their respective applications. If requested, SJI conveys 
the key issues and questions that arose during the review process. A 
decision by the SJI Board of Directors to deny an application may not 
be appealed, but it does not prohibit resubmission of a proposal in a 
subsequent funding cycle.
    8. Response to Notification of Award. Grantees have 30 days from 
the date they were notified about their award to respond to any 
revisions requested by the SJI Board of Directors. If the requested 
revisions (or a reasonable schedule for submitting such revisions) have 
not been submitted to SJI within 30 days after notification, the award 
may be rescinded, and the application presented to the SJI Board of 
Directors for reconsideration. Special conditions, in the form of 
incentives or sanctions, may also be used in other situations.

VI. How To Apply

    Applicants must use the SJI GMS to submit all applications and 
post-award documents. SJI urges applicants to submit applications at 
least 72 hours prior to the application due date in order to allow time 
for the applicant to receive an application acceptance message and to 
correct, in a timely fashion, any problems that may arise, such as 
missing or incomplete forms. Files must be in .doc, .docx, .xls, .xlsx, 
.pdf, .jpg, or .png format. Individual file size cannot exceed 5 MB.

a. Submission Steps

    Applicants (except for ESP) must register with the SJI GMS to 
submit applications for funding consideration. Below are the basic 
steps for submission:
    1. Access the SJI GMS and complete the information required to 
create an account.
    2. If you already have an account, log in and create a new 
application.
    3. Complete all required forms and upload all required documents:
    <bullet> Application Form.
    <bullet> Certificate of State Approval.
    <bullet> Budget and Budget Narrative.
    <bullet> Assurances.
    <bullet> Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.
    <bullet> Project Abstract.
    <bullet> Program Narrative.
    <bullet> Attachments.
    [ssquf] Letters of Support.
    [ssquf] Project Timeline.
    [ssquf] Resumes.
    [ssquf] Indirect Cost Approval.
    [ssquf] Other Attachments.
    4. Certify and submit the application to SJI for review.

VII. Post-Award Reporting Requirements

    All required reports and documents must be submitted via the SJI 
GMS.

a. Quarterly Reporting Requirements

    Recipients of SJI funds must submit Quarterly Progress and 
Financial Status Reports within 30 days after the close of each 
calendar quarter (i.e., no later than January 30, April 30, July 30, 
and October 30).
    1. Program Progress Reports. Program Progress Reports must include 
a narrative description of project activities during the calendar 
quarter; the relationship between those activities, the task schedule, 
and objectives set forth in the approved application or an approved 
adjustment thereto; any significant problem areas that have developed 
and how they will be resolved; and the activities scheduled during the 
next reporting period. Failure to comply with the requirements of this 
provision could result in the termination of a grantee's award.
    2. Financial Reporting. A Financial Status Report is required from 
all grantees for each active quarter on a calendar-quarter basis. This 
report is due within 30 days after the close of the calendar quarter. 
It is designed to provide financial information relating to SJI funds, 
State and local matching shares, project income, and any other sources 
of funds for the project, as well as information on obligations and 
outlays.

b. Request for Reimbursement of Funds

    Awardees will receive funds on a reimbursable basis via electronic 
funds transfer (EFT) basis. All request for reimbursement must be 
include a Unique Entity Identifier as generated by the System for 
Reward Management with an active registration. Upon receipt, review, 
and approval of a request for reimbursement by SJI, payment will be 
issued directly to the grantee or its designated fiscal agent. Requests 
for reimbursements, along with the instructions for their preparation, 
are available in the SJI GMS.
    1. Accounting System. Awardees are responsible for establishing and 
maintaining an adequate system of accounting and internal controls. 
Awardees are also responsible for ensuring an adequate system exists 
for each of their subgrantees and contractors. An acceptable and 
adequate accounting system:
    <bullet> Properly accounts for receipt of funds under each grant 
awarded and the expenditure of funds for each grant by category of 
expenditure (including matching contributions and project income).
    <bullet> Assures that expended funds are applied to the appropriate 
budget category included within the approved grant.
    <bullet> Presents and classifies historical costs of the grant as 
required for budgetary and evaluation purposes.
    <bullet> Provides cost and property controls to ensure optimal use 
of grant funds.
    <bullet> Is integrated with a system of internal controls adequate 
to safeguard the funds and assets covered, check the accuracy and 
reliability of the accounting data, promote operational efficiency, and 
assure conformance with any general or special conditions of the grant.
    <bullet> Meets the prescribed requirements for periodic financial 
reporting of operations.
    <bullet> Provides financial data for planning, control, 
measurement, and evaluation of direct and indirect costs.

c. Final Progress Report

    The Final Progress Report must describe the project activities 
during the final calendar quarter of the project and the close-out 
period, including to whom project products have been disseminated; 
provide a summary of activities during the entire project; specify 
whether all the objectives set

[[Page 84992]]

forth in the approved application or an approved adjustment have been 
met and, if any of the objectives have not been met, explain why not; 
and discuss what, if anything, could have been done differently that 
might have enhanced the impact of the project or improved its 
operation. In addition, grantees are required to submit electronic 
copies of the final products related to the project (e.g., reports, 
curriculum, etc.). These reporting requirements apply at the conclusion 
of every grant.

VIII. Compliance Requirements

a. Advocacy

    No funds made available by SJI may be used to support or conduct 
training programs for the purpose of advocating particular nonjudicial 
public policies or encouraging nonjudicial political activities (42 
U.S.C. 10706(b)).

b. Approval of Key Staff

    If the qualifications of an employee or consultant assigned to a 
key project staff position are not adequately described in the 
application or if there is a change of a person assigned to such a 
position, the recipient must submit a description of the qualifications 
of the newly assigned person to SJI. Prior written approval of the 
qualifications of the new person assigned to a key staff position must 
be received from SJI before the salary or consulting fee of that person 
and associated costs may be paid or reimbursed from grant funds.

c. Audit

    Recipients of SJI grants must provide for an annual fiscal audit, 
which includes an opinion on whether the financial statements of the 
grantee fairly present its financial position and its financial 
operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 
If requested, a copy of the audit report must be made available 
electronically to SJI.

d. Budget Revisions

    Budget revisions among direct cost categories that: (1) transfer 
grant funds to an unbudgeted cost category, or (2) individually or 
cumulatively exceed 5 percent of the approved original budget or the 
most recently approved revised budget require prior SJI approval. Refer 
to section X, Grant Adjustments, of this guideline for additional 
details about the process for modifying the project budget.

e. Conflict of Interest

    Personnel and other officials connected with SJI-funded programs 
must adhere to the following requirements:
    <bullet> Officials or employees of a recipient court or 
organization must not participate personally through decision, 
approval, disapproval, recommendation, the rendering of advice, 
investigation, or otherwise, in any proceeding, application, request 
for a ruling or other determination, contract, grant, cooperative 
agreement, claim, controversy, or other particular matter in which SJI 
funds are used, where, to their knowledge, they or their immediate 
family; partners; organization other than a public agency in which they 
are serving as officer, director, trustee, partner, or employee; or any 
person or organization with whom they are negotiating or have any 
arrangement concerning prospective employment have a financial 
interest.
    <bullet> In the use of SJI project funds, an official or employee 
of a recipient court or organization must avoid any action that might 
result in or create the appearance of:
    [ssquf] using an official position for private gain; or
    [ssquf] adversely affecting the confidence of the public in the 
integrity of the SJI program.
    <bullet> Requests for proposals (RFPs) or invitations for bids 
issued by a recipient of SJI funds or a subgrantee or subcontractor 
will provide notice to prospective bidders that the contractors who 
develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, and/
or RFPs for a proposed procurement will be excluded from bidding on or 
submitting a proposal to compete for the award of such procurement.

f. Inventions and Patents

    If any patentable items, patent rights, processes, or inventions 
are produced during the course of SJI-sponsored work, such fact must be 
promptly and fully reported to SJI. Unless there is a prior agreement 
between the grantee and SJI on the disposition of such items, SJI will 
determine whether protection of the invention or discovery may be 
sought should the grantee choose to pursue such protection.

g. Lobbying

    Funds awarded to recipients by SJI must not be used--directly or 
indirectly--to influence Executive Orders or similar promulgations by 
Federal, State, or local agencies; or to influence the passage or 
defeat of any legislation by Federal, State, or local legislative 
bodies (42 U.S.C. 10706(a)).
    It is the policy of the SJI Board of Directors to award funds only 
to support applications submitted by organizations that would carry out 
the objectives of their applications in an unbiased manner. Consistent 
with this policy and the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 10706, SJI will not 
knowingly award a grant to an applicant that has, directly or through 
an entity that is part of the same organization as the applicant, 
advocated a position before Congress on the specific subject matter of 
the application.

h. Matching Requirements

    All grant recipients are required to provide a match. A match is 
the portion of project costs not borne by SJI. A match includes both 
cash and in-kind contributions. A cash match is the direct outlay of 
funds by the grantee or a third party to support the project. An in-
kind match for State and local courts or other units of government 
consists of contributions of time and/or services of current staff 
members, new employees, space, supplies, etc., made to the project by 
the grantee or others (e.g., advisory board members) working directly 
on the project. Generally, these same items are considered cash matches 
for nongovernmental entities. For nongovernmental entities, a federally 
approved indirect cost rate may be used as an in-kind match for that 
portion of the rate that exceeds the limit of permitted charges for 
indirect costs (75 percent of salaries and benefits).
    Under normal circumstances, an allowable match may be incurred only 
during the project period. The amount and nature of the required match 
depends on the type of grant. Refer to section V.C.12, Matching 
Requirements, of this guideline for details by grant type. The grantee 
is responsible for ensuring that the total amount of the match proposed 
is contributed. If a proposed contribution is not fully met, SJI may 
reduce the award amount accordingly to maintain the ratio originally 
provided for in the award agreement. The match should be expended at 
the same rate as SJI funding.
    The SJI Board of Directors looks favorably upon any unrequired 
match contributed by applicants when making grant decisions. The match 
requirement may be waived in exceptionally rare circumstances upon the 
request of the chief justice of the highest court in the State or the 
highest-ranking official in the requesting organization, and approval 
by the SJI Board of Directors (42 U.S.C. 10705(d)). The SJI Board of 
Directors encourages all applicants to provide the maximum amount of 
cash and in-kind match possible, even if a waiver is approved. The 
amount and nature of the match are criteria in the grant selection 
process.

[[Page 84993]]

    Other Federal department and agency funding may not be used for a 
cash match.

i. Nondiscrimination

    No person may, on the basis of race, sex, national origin, 
disability, color, or creed, be excluded from participation in, denied 
the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination under any 
program or activity supported by SJI funds. Recipients of SJI funds 
must take any measures necessary to effectuate this provision 
immediately.

j. Political Activities

    No recipient may contribute or make available SJI funds, program 
personnel, or equipment to any political party or association or the 
campaign of any candidate for public or party office. Recipients are 
also prohibited from using funds in advocating or opposing any ballot 
measure, initiative, or referendum. Officers and employees of 
recipients must not intentionally identify SJI or recipients with any 
partisan or nonpartisan political activity associated with a political 
party or association or the campaign of any candidate for public or 
party office (42 U.S.C. 10706(a)).

k. Products

    1. Acknowledgment, Logo, and Disclaimer. Recipients of SJI funds 
must acknowledge prominently on all products that were developed with 
grant funds that support was received from SJI. The SJI logo must 
appear on the front cover of a written product, or in the opening 
frames of a multimedia product, unless another placement is approved in 
writing by SJI. This includes final products printed or otherwise 
reproduced during the grant period as well as reprintings or 
reproductions of those materials following the end of the grant period. 
The SJI logo can be downloaded from SJI's website (https://www.sji.gov) 
at the bottom of the ``Grants'' page.
    Recipients also must display the following disclaimer on all grant 
products: ``This [document, film, videotape, etc.] was developed under 
[grant/cooperative agreement] number SJI-[insert number] from the State 
Justice Institute. The points of view expressed are those of the 
[author(s), filmmaker(s), etc.] and do not necessarily represent the 
official position or policies of the State Justice Institute.''
    i. Project Grants. In addition to other required grant products and 
reports, recipients must provide a one-page executive summary of the 
project. The summary should include a background on the project, the 
tasks undertaken, and the outcome. In addition, the summary should 
provide the performance metrics that were used during the project, and 
how performance will be measured in the future.
    ii. TA Grants. Grantees must submit a final report that explains 
how they intend to act on the consultant's recommendations as well as a 
copy of the consultant's written report. Both should be submitted in 
electronic format.
    iii. CAT Grants. Grantees must submit an electronic version of the 
agenda or schedule, an outline of presentations and/or relevant 
instructor's notes; copies of overhead transparencies, Microsoft 
PowerPoint presentations, or other visual aids; exercises, case 
studies, and other background materials; hypotheticals, quizzes, and 
other materials involving the participants; manuals, handbooks, 
conference packets, and evaluation forms; and suggestions for 
replicating the program, including possible faculty or the preferred 
qualifications or experience of those selected as faculty, developed 
under the grant after the grant period, along with a final report that 
includes any evaluation results and explains how the grantee intends to 
present the educational program in the future, as well as the 
consultant's or trainer's report. All items should be submitted in 
electronic format.
    2. Charges for Grant-Related Products/Recovery of Costs. SJI's 
mission is to support improvements in the quality of justice and foster 
innovative, efficient solutions to common issues faced by all courts. 
SJI has recognized and established procedures for supporting research 
and development of grant products (e.g., a report, curriculum, video, 
software, database, or website) through competitive grant awards based 
on the merit reviews of proposed projects. To ensure that all grants 
benefit the entire court community, projects SJI considers worthy of 
support (in whole or in part) are required to be disseminated widely 
and to be available for public consumption. This includes open-source 
software and interfaces. Costs for development, production, and 
dissemination are allowable as direct costs to SJI.
    Applicants must disclose their intent to sell grant-related 
products in the application. Grantees must obtain SJI's prior written 
approval of their plans to recover project costs through the sale of 
grant products. Written requests to recover costs ordinarily should be 
received during the grant period and should specify the nature and 
extent of the costs to be recouped, the reason that such costs were not 
budgeted (if the rationale was not disclosed in the approved 
application), the number of copies to be sold, the intended audience 
for the products to be sold, and the proposed sale price. If the 
product is to be sold for more than $25, the written request should 
also include a detailed itemization of costs that will be recovered and 
a certification that the costs were not supported by either SJI grant 
funds or grantee matching contributions.
    If the sale of grant products results in revenues that exceed the 
costs to develop, produce, and disseminate the product, the revenue 
must continue to be used for the authorized purposes of the SJI-funded 
project or other purposes consistent with the State Justice Institute 
Act that have been approved by SJI.

l. Copyrights

    Except as otherwise provided in the terms and conditions of an SJI 
award, a recipient is free to copyright any books, publications, or 
other copyrightable materials developed in the course of an SJI-
supported project. SJI must reserve a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and 
irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and to 
authorize others to use the materials for purposes consistent with the 
State Justice Institute Act.

m. Due Date

    All products and, for TA and CAT grants, consultant and/or trainer 
reports are to be completed and distributed not later than the end of 
the award period, not the 90-day closeout period. The 90-day closeout 
period is intended only for grantee final reporting and to liquidate 
obligations.

n. Distribution

    In addition to the distribution specified in the grant application, 
grantees must send an electronic version of all products in HTML or PDF 
format to SJI.

o. Original Material

    All products prepared as the result of SJI-supported projects must 
be originally developed material unless otherwise specified in the 
award documents. Material not originally developed that is included in 
such products must be properly identified, whether the material is in a 
verbatim or extensive paraphrase format.

[[Page 84994]]

p. Prohibition Against Litigation Support

    No funds made available by SJI may be used directly or indirectly 
to support legal assistance for parties in litigation, including cases 
involving capital punishment.

q. Reporting Requirements

    All reports must be submitted via the SJI GMS as detailed below:
    1. Quarterly Progress and Financial Status Reports. Recipients of 
SJI funds must submit Quarterly Progress and Financial Status Reports 
within 30 days after the close of each calendar quarter (i.e., no later 
than January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30). The Quarterly 
Progress Reports must include a narrative description of project 
activities during the calendar quarter; the relationship between those 
activities, the task schedule, and objectives set forth in the approved 
application or an approved adjustment thereto; any significant problem 
areas that have developed and how they will be resolved; and the 
activities scheduled during the next reporting period. Failure to 
comply with the requirements of this provision could result in the 
termination of a grantee's award.
    2. Quarterly Financial Reporting. The Quarterly Financial Report 
must be submitted in accordance with section VII.A.2, Financial 
Reporting, of this guideline. A Final Progress Report and Financial 
Status Report must be submitted within 90 days after the end of the 
grant period.

r. Research

    1. Availability of Research Data for Secondary Analysis. Upon 
request, grantees must make available for secondary analysis backup 
files containing research and evaluation data collected under an SJI 
grant and the accompanying code manual. Grantees may recover the actual 
cost of duplicating and mailing, or otherwise transmitting, the dataset 
and manual from the person or organization requesting the data. 
Grantees may provide the requested dataset in the format in which it 
was created and analyzed.
    2. Confidentiality of Information. Except as provided by Federal 
law other than the State Justice Institute Act, no recipient of 
financial assistance from SJI may use or reveal any research or 
statistical information furnished under the Act by any person and 
identifiable to any specific private person for any purpose other than 
the purpose for which the information was obtained. Such information 
and copies thereof will be immune from legal process and must not, 
without the consent of the person furnishing such information, be 
admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any action; suit; or 
other judicial, legislative, or administrative proceedings.
    3. Human Subject Protection. Human subjects are defined as 
individuals who are participants in an experimental procedure or who 
are asked to provide information about themselves, their attitudes, 
feelings, opinions, and/or experiences through an interview, 
questionnaire, or other data collection technique. All research 
involving human subjects must be conducted with the informed consent of 
those subjects and in a manner that will ensure their privacy and 
freedom from risk or harm and the protection of people who are not 
subjects of the research but would be affected by it--unless such 
procedures and safeguards would make the research impractical. In such 
instances, SJI must approve procedures designed by the grantee to 
provide human subjects with relevant information about the research 
after their involvement and minimize or eliminate risk or harm to those 
subjects due to their participation.
    4. Prohibited Uses of SJI Funds. To ensure SJI funds are used to 
supplement and improve the operation of State courts, rather than to 
support basic court services, SJI funds must not be used for the 
following purposes:
    <bullet> To supplant State or local funds supporting a program or 
activity (e.g., paying the salary of court employees who would be 
performing their normal duties as part of the project or paying rent 
for space which is part of the court's normal operations).
    <bullet> To construct court facilities or structures.
    <bullet> Solely to purchase equipment.
    Examples of basic court services include:

<bullet> Hiring of personnel
<bullet> Purchase and/or maintenance of equipment
<bullet> Purchase of software and/or licenses
<bullet> Purchase of internet access or service
<bullet> Supplies to support the day-to-day operations of courts

    The final determination of what constitutes basic court services is 
made by SJI and is not negotiable.
    Meals and refreshments are not allowable.
    Trinkets (e.g., hats, mugs, portfolios, T-shirts, coins, gift bags, 
gift cards, etc.) may not be purchased with SJI grant funding.
    5. Suspension or Termination of Funding. After providing a 
recipient reasonable notice and opportunity to submit written 
documentation demonstrating why fund termination or suspension should 
not occur, SJI may terminate or suspend funding of a project that fails 
to substantially comply with the Act, the Grant Guideline, or the terms 
and conditions of the award (42 U.S.C. 10708(a)).
    6. Title to Property. At the conclusion of the project, title to 
all expendable and nonexpendable personal property purchased with SJI 
funds must vest in the recipient court, organization, or individual 
that purchased the property if certification is made to and approved by 
SJI that the property will continue to be used for the authorized 
purposes of the SJI-funded project or other purposes consistent with 
the State Justice Institute Act. If such certification is not made or 
SJI disapproves of such certification, title to all such property with 
an aggregate or individual value of $1,000 or more must vest in SJI, 
which will direct the disposition of the property.

IX. Financial Requirements

    The purpose of this section is to establish accounting system 
requirements and offer guidance on procedures to assist all grantees, 
subgrantees, contractors, and other organizations in:
    <bullet> Complying with the statutory requirements for the award, 
disbursement, and accounting of funds.
    <bullet> Complying with regulatory requirements of SJI for the 
financial management and disposition of funds.
    <bullet> Generating financial data to be used in planning, 
managing, and controlling projects.
    <bullet> Facilitating an effective audit of funded programs and 
projects.

a. Supervision and Monitoring Responsibilities

    All grantees receiving awards from SJI are responsible for the 
management and fiscal control of all funds. Responsibilities include 
accounting for receipts and expenditures, maintaining adequate 
financial records, and refunding expenditures disallowed by audits. If 
the project includes subawards, the grantees' responsibilities also 
include:
    1. Reviewing Financial Operations. The grantee or its designee must 
be familiar with, and periodically monitor, its subgrantee's financial 
operations, records system, and procedures. Particular attention should 
be directed to the maintenance of current financial data.
    2. Recording Financial Activities. The subgrantee's grant award or 
contract

[[Page 84995]]

obligation as well as cash advances and other financial activities must 
be recorded in the financial records of the grantee or its designee in 
summary form. Subgrantee expenditures must be recorded on the books of 
the State supreme court or evidenced by report forms duly filed by the 
subgrantee. Matching contributions provided by subgrantees must 
likewise be recorded, as should any project income resulting from 
program operations.
    3. Budgeting and Budget Review. The grantee or its designee must 
ensure that each subgrantee prepares an adequate budget as the basis 
for its award commitment. The State supreme court must maintain the 
details of each project budget on file.
    4. Accounting for Match. The grantee or its designee will ensure 
that subgrantees comply with the match requirements specified in this 
guideline.
    5. Audit Requirement. The grantee or its designee must ensure that 
subgrantees meet the necessary audit requirements set forth by SJI.
    6. Reporting Irregularities. The grantee, its designees, and its 
subgrantees are responsible for promptly reporting to SJI the nature 
and circumstances surrounding any financial irregularities discovered.

b. Accounting System

    The grantee is responsible for establishing and maintaining an 
adequate system of accounting and internal controls and for ensuring 
that an adequate system exists for each of its subgrantees and 
contractors. An acceptable and adequate accounting system:
    <bullet> Properly accounts for receipt of funds under each grant 
awarded and the expenditure of funds for each grant by category of 
expenditure, including matching contributions and project income.
    <bullet> Assures that expended funds are applied to the appropriate 
budget category included within the approved grant.
    <bullet> Presents and classifies historical costs of the grant as 
required for budgetary and evaluation purposes.
    <bullet> Provides cost and property controls to ensure optimal use 
of grant funds.
    <bullet> Is integrated with a system of internal controls adequate 
to safeguard the funds and assets covered, check the accuracy and 
reliability of the accounting data, promote operational efficiency, and 
assure conformance with any general or special conditions of the grant.
    <bullet> Meets the prescribed requirements for periodic financial 
reporting of operations.
    <bullet> Provides financial data for planning, control, 
measurement, and evaluation of direct and indirect costs.

c. Total Cost Budgeting and Accounting

    Accounting for all funds awarded by SJI must be structured and 
executed on a total-project-cost basis. That is, total project costs, 
including SJI funds, State and local matching shares, and any other 
fund sources included in the approved project budget, serve as the 
foundation for fiscal administration and accounting. Grant applications 
and financial reports require budget and cost estimates based on total 
costs.
    1. Timing of Matching Contributions. Matching contributions should 
be applied at the same time as the obligation of SJI funds. Ordinarily, 
the full matching share must be obligated during the award period; 
however, with the written permission of SJI, contributions made 
following approval of the grant by the SJI Board of Directors but 
before the beginning of the grant may be counted as a match. If a 
proposed cash or in-kind match is not fully met, SJI may reduce the 
award amount accordingly to maintain the ratio of grant funds to 
matching funds stated in the award agreement.
    2. Records for Match. All grantees must maintain records that 
clearly show the source, amount, and timing of all matching 
contributions. In addition, if a project has included, within its 
approved budget, contributions that exceed the required matching 
portion, the grantee must maintain records of those contributions in 
the same manner as it does SJI funds and required matching shares. For 
all grants made to State and local courts, the State supreme court has 
primary responsibility for grantee/subgrantee compliance with the 
requirements of this section.
    3. Maintenance and Retention of Records. All financial records--
including supporting documents; statistical records; and all other 
information pertinent to grants, subgrants, cooperative agreements, or 
contracts under grants--must be retained by each organization 
participating in a project for at least 3 years for purposes of 
examination and audit. State supreme courts may impose record retention 
and maintenance requirements in addition to those prescribed in this 
section.
    4. Coverage. The retention requirement extends to books of original 
entry, source documents supporting accounting transactions, the general 
ledger, subsidiary ledgers, personnel and payroll records, canceled 
checks, and related documents and records. Source documents include 
copies of all grant and subgrant awards, applications, and required 
grantee/subgrantee financial and narrative reports. Personnel and 
payroll records must include the time and attendance reports for all 
individuals reimbursed under a grant, subgrant, or contract, whether 
they are employed full-time or part-time. Time and effort reports are 
required for consultants.
    5. Retention Period. The 3-year retention period starts from the 
date of the submission of the final expenditure report.
    6. Maintenance. Grantees and subgrantees are expected to see that 
records of different fiscal years are separately identified and 
maintained so that requested information can be readily located. 
Grantees and subgrantees are also obligated to protect records 
adequately against fire or other damage. When records are stored away 
from the grantee's or subgrantee's principal office, a written index of 
the location of stored records should be on hand, and ready access 
should be assured.
    7. Access. Grantees and subgrantees must give any authorized 
representative of SJI access to and the right to examine all records, 
books, papers, and documents related to an SJI grant.
    8. Project-Related Income. Records of the receipt and disposition 
of project-related income must be maintained by the grantee in the same 
manner as required for the project funds that gave rise to the income 
and must be reported to SJI (see section VII.A.2, Financial Reporting, 
of this guideline). The policies governing the disposition of the 
various types of project-related income are listed below.
    i. Interest. A State and any agency or instrumentality of a State, 
including institutions of higher education and hospitals, will not be 
held accountable for interest earned on advances of project funds. When 
funds are awarded to subgrantees through a State, the subgrantees are 
not held accountable for interest earned on advances of project funds. 
Local units of government and nonprofit organizations that are grantees 
must refund any interest earned. Grantees must ensure minimum balances 
in their respective grant cash accounts.
    ii. Royalties. The grantee or subgrantee may retain all royalties 
received from copyrights or other works developed under projects or 
from patents and inventions unless the terms and conditions of the 
grant provide otherwise.
    iii. Registration and Tuition Fees. Registration and tuition fees 
may be considered as a cash match with prior

[[Page 84996]]

written approval from SJI. Estimates of registration and tuition fees 
and any expenses to be offset by the fees should be included in the 
application budget forms and narrative.
    iv. Income from the Sale of Grant Products. If the sale of products 
occurs during the project period, the income may be treated as a cash 
match with the prior written approval of SJI. The costs and income 
generated by the sales must be reported on the Quarterly Progress and 
Financial Status Reports and documented in an auditable manner. 
Whenever possible, the intent to sell a product should be disclosed in 
the application or reported to SJI in writing once a decision to sell 
products has been made. The grantee must request approval to recover 
its product development, reproduction, and dissemination costs (see 
section VIII.K.2, Charges for Grant-Related Products/Recovery of Costs, 
of this guideline).
    v. Other. Other project income will be treated in accordance with 
disposition instructions set forth in the grant's terms and conditions.

d. Payments and Financial Reporting Requirements

    The procedures and regulations set forth below are applicable to 
all SJI grant funds and grantees.
    1. Request for Reimbursement of Funds. Grantees will receive funds 
on a reimbursable, U.S. Department of the Treasury check-issued or EFT 
basis. Upon receipt, review, and approval of a Request for 
Reimbursement (Form R) by SJI, payment will be issued directly to the 
grantee or its designated fiscal agent. The Form R, along with the 
instructions for its preparation and the SF 3881 Automated Clearing 
House (ACH/Miscellaneous Payment Enrollment Form for EFT), are 
available for download and submission in the SJI GMS.
    2. Financial Reporting.
    i. General Requirements. To obtain financial information concerning 
the use of funds, SJI requires that grantees/subgrantees submit timely 
reports for review.
    ii. Due Dates and Contents. A Financial Status Report is required 
from all grantees for each active quarter on a calendar-quarter basis. 
This report is due within 30 days after the close of the calendar 
quarter. It is designed to provide financial information relating to 
SJI funds, State and local matching shares, project income, and any 
other sources of funds for the project, as well as information on 
obligations and outlays. The Financial Status Report (Form F), along 
with instructions, is accessible in the SJI GMS. If a grantee requests 
substantial payment for a project prior to the completion of a given 
quarter, SJI may request a brief summary of the amount requested, by 
object class, to support the Request for Reimbursement.
    iii. Consequences of Noncompliance with Submission Requirement. 
Failure of the grantee to submit required Progress and Financial Status 
Reports may result in suspension or termination of grant reimbursement.

e. Allowability of Costs

1. Costs Requiring Prior Approval
    i. Pre-Agreement Costs. The written prior approval of SJI is 
required for costs that are considered necessary but that occur prior 
to the start date of the project period.
    ii. Equipment. Grant funds may be used to purchase or lease only 
that equipment essential to accomplishing the goals and objectives of 
the project. The written prior approval of SJI is required when: (1) 
the amount of automated data processing equipment to be purchased or 
leased exceeds $10,000 or (2) the amount of software to be purchased 
exceeds $3,000.
    iii. Consultants. The written prior approval of SJI is required 
when the rate of compensation to be paid to a consultant exceeds $800 a 
day. SJI funds may not be used to pay a consultant more than $1,100 per 
day.
    iv. Budget Revisions. Budget revisions among direct-cost categories 
that: (1) transfer grant funds to an unbudgeted cost category or (2) 
individually or cumulatively exceed 5 percent of the approved original 
budget or the most recently approved revised budget require prior SJI 
approval.
    2. Travel Costs. Transportation and per diem rates must comply with 
the policies of the grantee. If the grantee does not have an 
established written travel policy, then travel rates must be consistent 
with those established by the U.S. General Services Administration. 
Grant funds may not be used to cover the transportation or per diem 
costs for a member of a national organization to attend an annual or 
other regular meeting, or conference of that organization.
    3. Indirect Costs. Indirect costs are only applicable to 
organizations that are not State courts or government agencies. These 
are costs of an organization that are not readily assignable to a 
particular project but are necessary to the operation of the 
organization and the performance of the project. The costs of operating 
and maintaining facilities, depreciation, and administrative salaries 
are examples of the types of costs that are usually treated as indirect 
costs. Although SJI's policy requires all costs to be budgeted 
directly, it will accept indirect costs if a grantee has an indirect 
cost rate approved by a Federal agency; however, recoverable indirect 
costs are limited to no more than 75 percent of a grantee's direct 
personnel costs (salaries plus fringe benefits).
    i. Approved Plan Available.
    <bullet> A copy of an indirect cost rate agreement or allocation 
plan approved for a grantee during the preceding 2 years by any Federal 
granting agency on the basis of allocation methods substantially in 
accord with those set forth in the applicable cost circulars must be 
submitted to SJI.
    <bullet> Where flat rates are accepted in lieu of actual, indirect 
costs, grantees may not also charge expenses normally included in 
overhead pools (e.g., accounting services, legal services, building 
occupancy and maintenance, etc.) as direct costs.

f. Audit Requirements

    1. Implementation. Grantees must provide for an annual fiscal 
audit. This requirement also applies to a State or local court 
receiving a subgrant from the State supreme court. Audits conducted 
using generally accepted auditing standards in the United States will 
satisfy the requirement for an annual fiscal audit. The audit must be 
conducted by an independent Certified Public Accountant or a State or 
local agency authorized to audit government agencies. The audit report 
must be made available to SJI electronically, if requested.
    2. Resolution and Clearance of Audit Reports. Timely action on 
recommendations by responsible management officials is an integral part 
of the effectiveness of an audit. Each grantee must have policies and 
procedures for acting on audit recommendations by designating officials 
responsible for:
    <bullet> Following up.
    <bullet> Maintaining a record of the actions taken on 
recommendations and time schedules.
    <bullet> Responding to and acting on audit recommendations.
    <bullet> Submitting periodic reports to SJI on recommendations and 
actions taken.
    3. Consequences of Non-Resolution of Audit Issues. Ordinarily, SJI 
will not make a subsequent grant award to an applicant that has an 
unresolved audit report involving SJI awards. Failure of the grantee to 
resolve audit questions may also result in the suspension or 
termination of payments for active SJI grants to that organization.

[[Page 84997]]

g. Closeout of Grants

    1. Grantee Closeout Requirements. Within 90 days of the end date of 
the grant or any approved extension thereof, the following documents 
must be submitted to SJI by grantees:
    i. Financial Status Report. The final report of expenditures must 
have no unliquidated obligations and must indicate the exact balance of 
unobligated funds. Any unobligated or unexpended funds will be de-
obligated from the award by SJI. Final payment requests for obligations 
incurred during the award period must be submitted to SJI prior to the 
end of the 90-day closeout period.
    ii. Final Progress Report. This report should describe the project 
activities during the final calendar quarter of the project and the 
closeout period, including to whom project products have been 
disseminated; provide a summary of activities during the entire 
project; specify whether all the objectives set forth in the approved 
application or an approved adjustment have been met and, if any of the 
objectives have not been met, explain why not; and discuss what, if 
anything, could have been done differently that might have enhanced the 
impact of the project or improved its operation. These reporting 
requirements apply at the conclusion of every grant.
    2. Extension of Closeout Period. Upon the written request of the 
grantee, SJI may extend the closeout period to assure completion of the 
grantee's closeout requirements. Requests for an extension must be 
submitted at least 14 days before the end of the closeout period and 
must explain why the extension is necessary and what steps will be 
taken to assure that all the grantee's responsibilities will be met by 
the end of the extension period. Extensions must be submitted via the 
SJI GMS as Grant Adjustments.

X. Grant Adjustments

    All requests for programmatic or budgetary adjustments requiring 
SJI approval must be submitted by the project director in a timely 
manner (ordinarily 30 days prior to the implementation of the 
adjustment being requested). All requests for changes from the approved 
application will be carefully reviewed for both consistency with this 
guideline and the enhancement of grant goals and objectives. Failure to 
submit adjustments in a timely manner may result in the termination of 
a grantee's award.

a. Grant Adjustments Requiring Prior Written Approval

    The following Grant Adjustments require the prior written approval 
of SJI:
    <bullet> Budget revisions among direct cost categories that (1) 
transfer grant funds to an unbudgeted cost category or (2) individually 
or cumulatively exceed 5 percent of the approved original budget or the 
most recently approved revised budget.
    <bullet> A change in the scope of work to be performed or the 
objectives of the project.
    <bullet> A change in the project site.
    <bullet> A change in the project period, such as an extension of 
the grant period or extension of the Final Financial Report or Final 
Progress Report deadline.
    <bullet> Satisfaction of special conditions, if required.
    <bullet> A change in, or temporary absence of, the project 
director.
    <bullet> The assignment of an employee or consultant to a key staff 
position whose qualifications were not described in the application, or 
a change in a person assigned to a key project staff position.
    <bullet> A change in, or temporary absence of, the person 
responsible for managing and reporting on the grant's finances.
    <bullet> A change in the name of the grantee organization.
    <bullet> A transfer or contracting out of grant-supported 
activities.
    <bullet> A transfer of the grant to another recipient.
    <bullet> Pre-agreement costs.
    <bullet> The purchase of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 
equipment and software.
    <bullet> Consultant rates.
    <bullet> A change in the nature or number of the products to be 
prepared or the way a product would be distributed.

b. Requests for Grant Adjustments

    All grantees must promptly notify SJI, in writing, of events or 
proposed changes that may require adjustments to the approved project 
design. In requesting an adjustment, the grantee must set forth the 
reasons and basis for the proposed adjustment and any other information 
the program manager determines would help SJI's review. All requests 
for Grant Adjustments must be submitted via the SJI GMS.

c. Notification of Approval or Disapproval

    If the request is approved, the grantee will be sent a Grant 
Adjustment signed by the SJI Executive Director. If the request is 
denied, the grantee will be sent a written explanation of the reasons 
for the denial.

d. Changes in the Scope of the Grant

    Major changes in scope, duration, training methodology, or other 
significant areas must be approved in advance by SJI. A grantee may 
make minor changes to methodology, approach, or other aspects of the 
grant to expedite achievement of the grant's objectives with subsequent 
notification to SJI.

e. Date Changes

    A request to change or extend the grant period must be made at 
least 30 days in advance of the end date of the grant. A revised task 
plan must accompany a request for an extension of the grant period, 
along with a revised budget if shifts among budget categories will be 
needed. A request to change or extend the deadline for the Final 
Financial Report or Final Progress Report must be made at least 14 days 
in advance of the report deadline.

f. Temporary Absence of the Project Director

    Whenever an absence of the project director is expected to exceed a 
continuous period of 1 month, the plans for the conduct of the project 
director's duties during such absence must be approved in advance by 
SJI. This information must be provided in a letter signed by an 
authorized representative of the grantee or subgrantee at least 30 days 
before the departure of the project director or as soon as it is known 
that the project director will be absent. The grant may be terminated 
if arrangements are not approved in advance by SJI.

g. Withdrawal of or Change in Project Director

    If the project director relinquishes or expects to relinquish 
active direction of the project, SJI must be notified immediately. In 
such cases, if the grantee or subgrantee wishes to terminate the 
project, SJI will forward procedural instructions upon notification of 
such intent. If the grantee wishes to continue the project under the 
direction of another individual, a statement of the candidate's 
qualifications should be sent to SJI for review and approval. The grant 
may be terminated if the qualifications of the proposed individual are 
not approved in advance by SJI.

h. Transferring or Contracting Out of Grant-Supported Activities

    No principal activity of a grant-supported project may be 
transferred or contracted out to another organization without specific 
prior approval by SJI. All such arrangements must be formalized in a 
contract or other written

[[Page 84998]]

agreement between the parties involved. Copies of the proposed contract 
or agreement must be submitted for prior approval to SJI at the 
earliest possible time. The contract or agreement must state, at a 
minimum, the activities to be performed, the time schedule, the 
policies and procedures to be followed, the dollar limitation of the 
agreement, and the cost principles to be followed in determining what 
costs, both direct and indirect, will be allowed. The contract or other 
written agreement must not affect the grantee's overall responsibility 
for the direction of the project and accountability to SJI.

State Justice Institute Board of Directors

Hon. John Minton (Chair), Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Kentucky, 
Frankfort, KY
Daniel Becker (Vice Chair), State Court Administrator (ret.), Utah 
Administrative Office of the Courts, Salt Lake City, UT
Hon. Gayle A. Nachtigal (Secretary), Circuit Court Judge (ret.), 
Washington County Circuit Court, Hillsboro, OR
Hon. David Brewer (Treasurer), Justice (ret.), Supreme Court of Oregon, 
Salem, OR
Hon. Jonathan Lippman, Chief Judge of the State of New York (ret.); Of 
Counsel, Latham & Watkins, LLP, New York, NY
Hon. Chase Rogers, Chief Justice (ret.), Supreme Court of Connecticut; 
Partner, Day Pitney, LLP, Hartford, CT
Hon. Wilfredo Martinez, Senior Judge, Ninth Judicial Circuit of 
Florida, Orlando, FL
Marsha J. Rabiteau, President & CEO, Center for Human Trafficking Court 
Solutions, Bloomfield, CT
Isabel Framer, President, Language Access Consultants LLC, Copley, OH
Jonathan D. Mattiello, Executive Director (ex officio)

Jonathan D. Mattiello,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-24739 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-SC-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>