alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 20, 2010 

1213 

Order 

 

December 20, 2010 

141809 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141809 

 COA: 290686 

Kent CC: 07-013482-FH 

WILBERT TODD VANCE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1


                  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,
           as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  clickNsettle.com,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-QSB"),  I, Roy  Israel,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that;

(1)   The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d));
      and

(2)   The  information  contained  in the Form 10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Dated:  May 11, 2006


/s/ Roy Israel
-----------------------------------------------------
Roy Israel - Chairman of the Board, CEO and President
II

Calendar No. 56

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 437

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 333 Las

Vegas Boulevard South in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ‘‘Lloyd D. George

United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 22, 1999

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. BRYAN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

MARCH 17, 1999

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South in Las Vegas,

Nevada, as the ‘‘Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 437 RS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LLOYD D. GEORGE UNITED

2 STATES COURTHOUSE.

3 The United States courthouse under construction at

4 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South in Las Vegas, Nevada,

5 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lloyd D. George

6 United States Courthouse’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

10 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

11 to be a reference to the ‘‘Lloyd D. George United States

12 Courthouse’’.

Calendar No. 56

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 437

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under

United States Courthouse’’.in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ‘‘Lloyd D. Georgeconstruction at 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South

MARCH 17, 1999

Reported without amendment
P.1 

OAR Box 1781 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

85) IV-B-9 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/29/2008 10:46:22 AM Sheet 85 of 142 
P.2 

i * * • 

- Smith.Pam@epamail.epa.gov, 10:32 AM 7/8/2002 -0400, A-90-37 Docket Submittal 

Chad Whiteman 

To: Lynn 

Hutchinson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

05/30/02 02:11 PM cc: Sarah Dunham/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin 

Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: utility emissions compared 

A-90-37 

TV-B-09 

Lynn, 

Attached is the power point slide which compares the S02, NOx, Hg and 

C02 emissions from electric utilities to the industrial, transportation 

and other sectors. The pie chart data gives year 2000 data for S02, 

NOx, and C02 and 1999 data for Hg emissions. If you click on the pie 

chart the supporting data given in the spreadsheet may say 1998 in the 

column headers but the data is actually 2000 or 199 data (as referenced 

above). 

(See attached file: EmissionsPieChartsNEWwithC02.ppt) 

Attached is a list of all of die stationary sources in the US and their 

associated NOx and S02 emissions compared subsets of the total which 

include the emissions from just boilers and turbines, emissions from 

boilers and turbines great than 25 MW, and boilers and turbines greater 

than 100 MW. We put this together in January of 2001. 

(See attached file: emm profile.wpd) 

If you have any questions about the information feel free to give me a 

call. 

Best Regards, 

Chad S. Whiteman 

USEPA, Clean Air Markets Division 

(202) 564-9746 

(202) 564-1980-fax 

whiteman.chad@epa.gov 

\ 

1 

: SL 11 m. ; 

EPA A'T TOCK5T 

EmissionsPieChartsNE WwithC02 .ppt 

6. 

emm profile.wpd 

Printed for Joanne O'Loughlin <oloughlin.joanne@ecrweb.com> 7/8/2002 
Profile of Stationary Sources in the Continental US 

All Sources 

Boilers and Turbines 

Boilers and Turbines greater than 25 

MWe or 250 mmBtu/hr 

- Currently generating electricity 

- Currently not generating electricity 

Boilers and Turbines greater than 100 

MWe or 1000 mmBtu/hr 

UNITS 

Number 

394,931 

74,415 

4,583 

1,783 

2,800 

1,726 

Percentage 

100% 

19% 

1% 

0.4% 

NOx EMISSIONS 

Amount (tons) 

8,938,526 

8,292,009 

6,810,810 

6,027,721 

783,089 

5,938,015 

Percentage 

100% 

93% 

76% 

66% 

S02 EMISSIONS 

Amount (tons) 

16,170,590 

14,859,457 

13,696,622 

12,889,965 

806,657 

12,177,486 

Percentage 

100% 

92% 

85% 

75% 

CO 
Electric Power Generation: 

Major Source of Emissions 

2000 Sulfur Dioxide 2000 Nitrogen Oxides 1999 Mercury 

2000 Carbon Dioxide 

Fuel Combustion 

electric utilities 

Other stationary 

combustion * 

• Industrial Processing 

• Transportation 

• Miscellaneous 

* Other stationary combustion includes residential and commercial sources. 

TJ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEROY THOMAS TAYLOR,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 43 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
IRF-2014.6.29-EX10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1




August 14, 2014


Ilan Daskal


Dear Ilan:


Reference is made to your offer letter (“Offer Letter”) dated September 19, 2008, setting out your position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of International Rectifier Corporation (“Company”). 


The purpose of this letter is to supplement the terms of the Offer Letter to memorialize an increase in base salary and elimination of car allowance effective as of the commencement of the Company’s 2015 fiscal year (“Effective Date”), as follows:


		
	1.
	Effective as of the Effective Date, your annual salary is increased from $368,000 per year to $375,000 per year; and




		
	2.
	Effective as of the Effective Date, all references in the Offer Letter to “Car Allowance” are hereby deleted and there shall be no further benefits thereunder.




Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing where indicated below.


Regards,


INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION 




/s/ Lawrence Michlovich
By: Lawrence Michlovich
Its:  Assistant Secretary




Acknowledged and agreed:




/s/ Ilan Daskal                
Ilan Daskal
Date:  8/14/2014
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, JosephB. Armes, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 13, 2007 | /s/ JOSEPH B.  ARMES                                            |   |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Joseph B. Armes                                                 |   |
|                         | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 203 (Monday, October 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24278]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without change and will not be 
modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would not be appropriate for public disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than November 5, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98dbf7f5f5fdf6ecebb6f9e8e8f4f1fbf9ecf1f7f6ebd8fbf0f1b6feeafab6f7eaff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3b09c9e9e969d8780dd9283839f9a9092879a9c9d80b3909b9add958191dd9c8194">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Louis James Schweigert, Cuba City, Wisconsin; to acquire voting 
shares of BSB Community Bancorporation, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of Benton State Bank, both of Benton, Wisconsin.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-24278 Filed 10-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             (5)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      438
<ALLOWANCES>                                        40
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   469
<PP&E>                                             312
<DEPRECIATION>                                     106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              962
<BONDS>                                            400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                        (64)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       900
<SALES>                                            813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   813
<CGS>                                              197
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     11
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  9
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         9
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .005
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 85251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24769]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 24-073]


International Space Station Advisory Committee

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a 
meeting of the NASA International Space Station Advisory Committee. The 
purpose of the meeting is to review aspects related to the safety and 
operational readiness of the International Space Station.

DATES: November 13, 2024, 10-11:00 a.m. All times are eastern time.

ADDRESSES: Public attendance will be virtual only. See dial-in and 
Webinar information below under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis McSweeney, Designated Federal 
Officer, ISS Advisory Committee, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 
20546, via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d6b2b3b8b8bfa5f8bbb5a5a1b3b3b8b3af96b8b7a5b7f8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="36525358585f45185b554541535358534f765857455718515940">[email protected]</span></a> or at 202-834-7351.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As noted above, this meeting will be open to 
the public via Webinar and telephonically. Webinar connectivity 
information is provided below. For audio, when you join the Webinar 
event, you may use your computer to join or call the U.S. toll 
conference number listed.
    November 13, 2024, link: https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_NjcwNWIxYTktYjMyYy00OWIwLWI1Y2ItZDBmZjg3OGRkYmYx%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%227005d458-45be-48ae-8140-d43da96dd17b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22453f1a86-a177-4251-b896-a3c23cc1a9a1%22%7d.
    Meeting ID: 276 024 759 223, Passcode: Ktdm9N, Call in number 
(audio only): +1 256-715-9946, Phone conference ID: 450362467#.
    It is imperative that the meeting be held on this day to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Jamie M. Krauk,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-24769 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DENIED and Opinion Filed July 26, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00654-CV IN RE ROCKY CORONADO, Relator Original Proceeding from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1400535

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Goldstein In his July 3, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from the trial court’s failure to file and rule on a separate petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the district clerk to ac cept one or more doc uments presented for filing.

T o establish a right to mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator must show that the trial court violated a minist erial duty and there is no adequate remedy at law. In re State ex rel. Weeks , 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Cr im. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). To obtain mandamus relief comp elling the trial court to rule on a motion, a relator must show (1) the trial c ourt had a legal duty to rule on the motion,–2– (2) the relator requested a ruling, and (3) the trial court failed or refused to do so within a reasonable time. In re Prado , 522 S.W.3d 1, 2 (Tex . App.—Dallas 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). It is relator’s burden to provide a record sufficient to establish his right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in numerous respects. See, e.g. , T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(a)–(k), 52.7(a). For instance, a petition seeking mandamus relief must include a certification stating that the relator “has reviewed the petition and c oncluded that every factual statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the appendix or record.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(j). Relator failed to certify his petition. Additionally, Rule 52.3(k)(1)(A) requires a relator to file an appendix with his petition that contains “a certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A). Rule 52.7(a)(1) requires the re lator to file with his petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief that was filed in any underlying proceeding.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.7(a)(1). Relator failed to include with his petition any documents mate rial to his claim for relief.–3– Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

230654F.P05 /Bonnie Lee Goldstein / BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-11174

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHAEL BROWNE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-305-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Browne has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Browne has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 16, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-11174 Document: 00512020906 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/16/2012
No. 11-11174

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-11174 Document: 00512020906 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/16/2012
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-12326-01-R6]


Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Order on Petition for 
Objection to State Operating Permit for the Nucor Steel Louisiana, LLC, 
Direct Reduced Iron Facility, St. James Parish, Louisiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an order dated September 27, 2024, granting in part and denying in part 
a Petition dated December 4, 2023, from the Myrtle Felton, Barbara 
Washington, Gail Leboeuf, Inclusive Louisiana, and Louisiana Bucket 
Brigade (the Petitioners). The Petition requested that the EPA object 
to a Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating permit issued by the 
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) to Nucor Steel 
Louisiana, L.L.C., Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) Facility, located in 
Covent, St. James Parish, Louisiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Layton, EPA Region 6 Office, 
Air Permits Section, (214) 665-2136, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b575a424f5455155e5752415a595e4f537b5e4b5a155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbb7baa2afb4b5f5beb7b2a1bab9beafb39bbeabbaf5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>. The 
final order and petition are available electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA received a petition from Myrtle 
Felton, Barbara Washington, Gail Leboeuf, Inclusive Louisiana, and 
Louisiana Bucket Brigade dated December 4, 2023, requesting that the 
EPA object to the issuance of operating permit no. No. 3086-V10, issued 
by LDEQ to the Nucor Steel Louisiana, L.L.C., DRI Facility in St. James 
Parish, Convent, Louisiana. On September 27, 2024, the EPA 
Administrator issued an order granting in part and denying in part the 
Petition. The order explains the basis for the EPA's decision.
    Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner 
may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny 
issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuity no later 
than December 23, 2024.

    Dated: October 16, 2024.
David Garcia,
Director, Air and Radiation Division, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2024-24366 Filed 10-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered March 1 2 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 14
- 00126
- CV
Sheik Tehuti , Appellant
V.
Trans
- Atlas Financial , Inc. , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. CC
- 13
- 06496
- C


### O RDER Appellant’s motion for court order for deposit and motion for court order judicial order for deposit are DENIED

. All motions pending at this time in this case are DENIED.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE