alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clear Skies Solar, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Ezra J. Green, the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Clear Skies Solar, Inc. and Arthur L. Goldberg, the Chief Financial Officer of Clear Skies Solar, Inc., each certifies that:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Ezra J. GreenName:Ezra J. GreenTitle:Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:November 22, 2010By:/s/ Arthur L. GoldbergName:Arthur L. GoldbergTitle:Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)Dated:November 22,  2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND AS
OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000925663
<NAME> MIRADOR EQUITY PARTNERS, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,428)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                               927,069
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        3,155,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                         452,134
<INVENTORY>                                          376,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5,105,927
<PP&E>                                               3,029,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                       799,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       25,876,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                12,220,987
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             21,975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           9,045,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         25,876,862
<SALES>                                              8,604,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     8,604,812
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,956,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     5,178,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (616,729)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (4,146,816)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (4,146,816)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (4,146,816)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (2.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (2.10)
        

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-14-00629-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS, RICHARD FREYMANN,

AND RONALD CASTILLO

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relators, State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, and Ronald Castillo, filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable 

Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, 

Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators’ verified plea in abatement and to enter an 

order abating the suit for damages brought against relators by the real parties in interest, 

Homero Gracia and Maria Gracia, until sixty days after they provide relators with a notice 

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

letter for their claim stating the specific, separate amounts for the claimed damages and 

attorney’s fees. See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d 

C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) 

(“Abatement”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original Proceedings). In 

addition, relators request that this Court issue immediate temporary relief staying 

respondent’s order denying the plea in abatement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10 

(“Temporary Relief”). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus 

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of mandamus should be 

denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard 

Freymann, and Nathan Burris, No. 13-14-00347-CV, 2014 WL 4243701, at **4–9 (Tex. 

App.—Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op). Accordingly, the 

Court DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary 

relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

29th day of October, 2014.
**EXHIBIT 21**SUBSIDIARIES         **Other names under**  **Jurisdiction of** **which entity does****Subsidiary Name** **Incorporation** **business**Cricket Communications, Inc. Delaware Cricket Wireless, Inc.Cricket Licensee (Reauction), Inc. Delaware  Cricket Licensee I, Inc. Delaware  Cricket Licensee 2007, LLC Delaware  Chasetel Real Estate Holding Company, Inc. Tennessee  Cricket Alabama Property Company Delaware  Cricket Arizona Property Company Delaware  Cricket Arkansas Property Company Delaware  Cricket California Property Company Delaware  Cricket Colorado Property Company Delaware  Cricket Florida Property Company Delaware  Cricket Georgia Property Company, Inc. Delaware  Cricket Idaho Property Company Delaware  Cricket Illinois Property Company Delaware  Cricket Indiana Property Company Delaware  Cricket Kansas Property Company Delaware  Cricket Kentucky Property Company Delaware  Cricket Michigan Property Company Delaware  Cricket Minnesota Property Company Delaware  Cricket Mississippi Property Company Delaware  Cricket Nebraska Property Company Delaware  Cricket Nevada Property Company Delaware  Cricket New Mexico Property Company Delaware  Cricket New York Property Company, Inc. Delaware  Cricket North Carolina Property Company Delaware  Cricket Ohio Property Company Delaware  Cricket Oklahoma Property Company Delaware  Cricket Oregon Property Company Delaware  Cricket Pennsylvania Property Company Delaware  Cricket Texas Property Company Delaware  Cricket Utah Property Company Delaware  Cricket Washington Property Company Delaware  Cricket Wisconsin Property Company Delaware  Leap Wireless Mexico S.A. de C.V. Mexico  Orrengrove Investments Limited Cyprus
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form
10-Q of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jason K. Wadzinski 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Jason K. Wadzinski     
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
DENIED and Opinion Filed May 26, 2021 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00376-CV IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. JOHN CREUZOT, CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS Original Proceeding from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F19-40504-T MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Myers Before the Court is the State’s May 25, 2021 Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief. In its petition, the State requests the Court compel the trial court to vacate its order issued under artic le 39.14 of the code of criminal procedure compelling the State to notify the defense of the approximate dates, locations, and conduct of the pred icate acts the State will rely upon to prosecute the defendant on a charge of continuous sexual abuse. To be entitled to mandamus relief, the re lator must show (1) it has no adequate remedy at law and (2) what it seeks is a ministerial act. In re State ex rel. Weeks , 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). An act is ministerial if the relator has–2– a clear right to the relief sought. Id . The relator has a clear right to relief when the facts and circumstances dictate but one rational decision under unequivocal, wellsettled, and clearly controlling legal principles. See id

. After reviewing the State’s petition and th e record, we conclude the State has not carried its burden to show the trial court violated a ministerial duty in issuing the discovery order. See id .; see also In re State ex rel. Skurka , 512 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2016, orig. proceeding) (concluding discovery order under article 39.14 requiring State to designa te which jail recordings it would admit into evidence at trial did not exceed scope of trial court’s authorit y so as to justify mandamus relief in light of standard of review, work-product doctrine, facts and circumstances of case, and trial court’s di scretion in determini ng issues related to discovery). We deny the State’s petition for writ of mandamus. Having denied the State’s petition, we also deny as moot the Stat e’s emergency motion for temporary relief.

210376F.P05 /Lana M y ers / LANA MYERS JUSTICE
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 449

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the

personal representative of the estate of Fred Steffens

of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land comprising

the Steffens family property.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 449 ES

1 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF STEFFENS FAMILY PROPERTY.

2 (a) CONVEYANCE.—Subject to subsection (b) and

3 valid existing rights, the Secretary of the Interior shall

4 issue, without consideration, a quitclaim deed to Marie

5 Wambeke of Big Horn County, Wyoming, the personal

6 representative of the estate of Fred Steffens, to the land

7 described in subsection (c).

8 (b) RESERVATION OF MINERALS.—All minerals un9 derlying the land described in subsection (c) are reserved

10 to the United States.

11 (c) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land described in this

12 subsection is the parcel comprising approximately 80 acres

and known as ‘‘Farm Unit C’’ in the E1⁄2NW1 13 ⁄4 of Section

14 27 in Township 57 North, Range 97 West, 6th Principal

15 Meridian, Wyoming.

16 (d) REVOCATION OF WITHDRAWAL.—The withdrawal

17 for the Shoshone Reclamation Project made by the Bu18 reau of Reclamation under Secretarial Order dated Octo19 ber 21, 1913, is revoked with respect to the land described

20 in subsection (c).

Passed the Senate April 19, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 449

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer

erty.certain land comprising the Steffens family propFred Steffens of Big Horn County, Wyoming,to the personal representative of the estate of
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of AI Document Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leonard Armenta, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: August 19, 2015   /s/Marvin Woods Marvin Woods Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,028,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,106,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        436,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    150,000
<COMMON>                                           195
<OTHER-SE>                                     365,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,106,702
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,693
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,378
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,378
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
[Cite as State v. Pugh, 2016-Ohio-5755.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO 

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

 SANDUSKY COUNTY 

State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. S-16-009 

 

 Appellee Trial Court No. CRB 1500906 A 

v. 

Gary L. Pugh, Jr. DECISION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant Decided: September 9, 2016 

* * * * * 

 Brett A. Klimkowsky, for appellant. 

* * * * * 

PIETRYKOWSKI, J. 

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Gary L. Pugh, Jr., appeals the February 9, 2016 

judgment of the Fremont Municipal Court which, following his guilty plea to resisting 

arrest, sentenced him to 30 days in jail to be served consecutively to a three-day sentence 

on an OVI conviction. Appellant was also required to pay various fines. 
2.

{¶ 2} The relevant facts of this case are as follows. On November 28, 2015, 

appellant was charged with resisting arrest, obstructing official business, and drug abuse. 

The charges stemmed from a stop of appellant’s vehicle, observation of marijuana, and a 

physical confrontation with the officers effectuating his arrest. 

{¶ 3} On January 7, 2016, appellant entered a guilty plea to resisting arrest; the 

remaining charges were dismissed. Appellant was sentenced and this appeal followed. 

{¶ 4} Appellant has appealed the conviction and sentence to this court through 

appointed counsel. Appellant’s counsel advises the court, however, under procedures 

announced in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), 

that he has thoroughly examined the record, discussed the case with appellant, and is 

unable to find meritorious grounds for appeal. Following Anders and 6th 

Dist.Loc.App.R. 10(G), appellate counsel filed a brief stating that he can find no arguable 

errors and requesting that the court independently examine the record for error. Counsel 

notified appellant of his inability to find meritorious grounds for appeal and provided 

appellant with copies of both the Anders brief and his motion to withdraw. Counsel 

advised appellant of his right to file his own appellate brief. Counsel has also filed a 

motion to withdraw as counsel. Appellant has not filed an additional brief 

{¶ 5} Upon review of appellant’s counsel’s no-error brief and upon independent 

review of the record of the proceedings below, we conclude that this appeal lacks any 

issue of arguable merit and is, therefore, wholly frivolous. We grant the motion of 
3.

appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel in this appeal and affirm the judgment of the 

Fremont Municipal Court. Pursuant to App.R. 24, appellant is ordered to pay the costs in 

this appeal. The clerk is ordered to serve all parties with notice of this decision. 

Judgment affirmed. 

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27. 

See also 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 4. 

Mark L. Pietrykowski, J. _______________________________ 

JUDGE 

Arlene Singer, J. 

_______________________________ 

James D. Jensen, P.J. JUDGE 

CONCUR. 

_______________________________ 

JUDGE
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statements of Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. on (1) Form S-3
(registration # 333-81344 effective on February 22, 2002) , (2) Form S-3
(registration # 333-96189 effective on March 21, 2000) and (3) Form S-8
(registration # 333-93895 effective on December 30, 1999 as amended on June 28,
2001) and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February
22, 2002, except for Note L[1] as to which the date is March 4, 2002 and Note
L[2] as to which the date is March 25, 2002, with respect to our audit of the
financial statements of Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. included in its
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
April 1, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                       789
<INVENTORY>                                     15,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,712
<PP&E>                                          39,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,949
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,779
<SALES>                                        110,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,011
<CGS>                                           97,864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,732)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,248)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,484)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.97)
        

</TABLE>