alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO15 U. S. C. §7241AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, J. T. Malugen, certify that:

 

# **1.**             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form l0-Qof Movie Gallery, Inc.;

 

# **2.**             Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

# **3.**             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

# **4.**             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

(a)  designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)  disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

# **5.**      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

(a)  all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

## **(b)**  anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 19, 2003 |
|------------------------------------|
|                               |
|                               |
| /s/  J. T. Malugen            |   |
| J. T. Malugen                      |
| Chief Executive Officer            |

 

----
#### Hunter, Appellant, vs. Majerus, Respondent.

*665For the appellant: *Místele & Smith*of Jefferson, attorneys, and *R. P. Roedell*of Dubuque, Iowa, of counsel.

For the respondent: *Smith & Kelley*of Fort Atkinson, attorneys, and *Arthur Wickham*of Milwaukee of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
----

| 1   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods explained in the report. |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/  Adrian Sarbu           | /s/  David Sach     |
|--------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|   | Adrian Sarbu                          | David Sach                    |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)         | (Principal Financial Officer) |
|   | July 28, 2010                         | July 28, 2010                 |

----
Exhibit 99.21








CONSENT


Ladies and
Gentlemen:





The undersigned
hereby consents to (1) the references to the undersigned’s
name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report
entitled “Technical Report with an Updated Mineral Resource
Estimate for the Waterbury Lake Property, Northern
Saskatchewan” dated December 21, 2018, and (2) all other
references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines
Corp.








Dated: March 13,
2019











(Signed) "Paul
Burry"


__________________________


Paul Burry,
P.Geo.


Denison Mines
Corp.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,308
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,657
<INVENTORY>                                    222,611
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               418,406
<PP&E>                                         154,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                 241,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 979,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          171,796
<BONDS>                                        669,253
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     88,430
<COMMON>                                           669
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,672)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   979,679
<SALES>                                        617,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               617,578
<CGS>                                          408,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  408,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               236,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (47,254)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,058)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,393)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,451)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.29)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Security Bank Corporation (the Company) for the period ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the Report), H. Averett Walker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. McLemore, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 9, 2008



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ H. Averett Walker                               
|H. Averett Walker                                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                                                    
|Date: May 9, 2008                                   
|                                                    
|/s/ James R. McLemore, Jr.                          
|James R. McLemore, Jr.                              
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Journal officiel C 178/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 178 |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 59e année18 mai 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 178

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

59e année18 mai 2016

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rectificatifs |
| 2016/C 178/01 | Rectificatif à la position (UE) no 1/2016 du Conseil en première lecture en vue de l'adoption du règlement du Parlement européen et du Conseil relatif à l'Agence de l'Union européenne pour les chemins de fer et abrogeant le règlement (CE) no 881/2004 — Adoptée par le Conseil le 10 décembre 2015( JO C 56 du 12.2.2016 ) | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

Rectificatifs

2016/C 178/01

Rectificatif à la position (UE) no 1/2016 du Conseil en première lecture en vue de l'adoption du règlement du Parlement européen et du Conseil relatif à l'Agence de l'Union européenne pour les chemins de fer et abrogeant le règlement (CE) no 881/2004 — Adoptée par le Conseil le 10 décembre 2015( JO C 56 du 12.2.2016 )

o

o

( JO C 56 du 12.2.2016 )

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

Rectificatifs

| 18.5.2016 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | C 178/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2016

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

C 178/1

---

Rectificatif à la position (UE) no 1/2016 du Conseil en première lecture en vue de l'adoption du règlement du Parlement européen et du Conseil relatif à l'Agence de l'Union européenne pour les chemins de fer et abrogeant le règlement (CE) no 881/2004 — Adoptée par le Conseil le 10 décembre 2015

(
  «Journal officiel de l'Union européenne» C 56 du 12 février 2016
  )

(2016/C 178/01)

Page 39, article 65, paragraphe 10:

au lieu de:

«10.   Le Parlement européen, sur recommandation du Conseil statuant à la majorité qualifiée, donne, avant le 30 avril de l'année N + 2, décharge au directeur exécutif de l'exécution du budget de l'exercice N.»

lire:

«10.   Le Parlement européen, sur recommandation du Conseil statuant à la majorité qualifiée, donne, avant le 15 mai de l'année N + 2, décharge au directeur exécutif de l'exécution du budget de l'exercice N.»

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 24, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 481 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-85, K2025-83.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24605 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 30, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60244 Summary Calendar

ROMAN NUNEZ-DELGADO, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALEZ, U.S. ATTORNEY, Respondent.

Petition for Review from an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA No.A78-273-421)

_______________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Petitioner claims that the Immigration Judge failed to provide a separate written or oral decision regarding the issue of whether he falsely represented himself as a United States citizen for the purpose or benefit of obtaining employment, registering to vote,2

voting in an election, obtaining a driver’s license, and attempting to evade detection and apprehension; however, Petitioner failed to raise the issue in his appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Thus, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this issue. See Wang v. Ashcroft , 260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir. 2001). DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clear Skies Solar, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Ezra J. Green, the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Arthur L. Goldberg, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certifies that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Ezra J. GreenName:Ezra J. GreenTitle:Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:May 13, 2011By:/s/ Arthur L. GoldbergName:Arthur L. GoldbergTitle:Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)Dated:May 13,  2011
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Retalix Ltd. (the Company)
for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Barry Shaked, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge:

1.       
          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 21, 2006

| |  | /s/ Barry Shaked
Barry ShakedChief Executive Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### B. W. Preston v. James Caul, Hattie E. Caul, Appellants, and B. P. Anderson.

Chattel Mortgages : sufficient description. Description of property in a chattel mortgage is sufficient to give constructive notice to subsequent lienholders, it purporting to be made by C., ‘‘in the county of Mahaska and the state of Iowa,” the property being described as “ one sorrel colt coming two years old, a standard bred stallion colt called S.it being recited, “It is provided that said C. gives this mortgage on said stallion colt for a half interest in the same,” and conditioned that C. shall not remove the property “from said county of Mahaska.”

*Appeal from Mahasha District Gourt.*— HoN. D. Kyan, Judge.

Friday, October 20, 1899.

Action in equity upon a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage securing it. The defendants answered denying the validity of plaintiff’s mortgage, and setting up two certain mortgages on the same property, one in favor of Hattie E. Caul, and the other in favor of defendant Anderson, as prior and superior to the lien of the mortgage held by plaintiff. A demurrer to the answer was sustained. Defendants electing to stand on such pleading, a decree was rendered in plaintiff’s favor. Defendants James Caul .and Hattie E. Caul *appeal.*

Affirmed.

*Dan Davis*for appellants.

*John O’Malcolm*and *G. W. Lafferty*for appellee.

*444WatebmaN, J.

Plaintiff’s mortgage was first made- and recorded, and the sol© question we have to determine is, was the description given therein of the property sufficient to afford constructive notice to subsequent lien-holders ?' The mortgage purports to be made by James Caul, “in the-county of Mahaska and the state of Iowa.” The property is thus described: “One sorrel colt, coming two years old,, a standard stallion bred colt called ‘Seattle.’ ” Continuing,, the instrument recites: “It is provided that said James-Caul gives this mortgage on said stallion colt for one-half' interest in said stallion colt.” It is a further condition of said instrument that Caul shall not remove the property “from said county of Mahaska.” It appears clear from this mortgage that Caul owned an interest, at least, in this-horse; that he had the property in Mahaska county; and the-color, age, and name of said animal are given. This is a sufficient description to impart constructive notice to those-subsequently dealing with the *property.*— Shellhammer *v.*Jones, 87 Iowa, 520; *Brock v.*Barr, 70 Iowa, 400.- — Affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Yantai Dahua Holdings, Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: October 3, 2007/s/ TANG YuxiangName:TANG YuxiangTitle:President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: October 3, 2007/s/ QU ShizhiName:QU ShizhiTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Federal Refrigerator Manufacturing Company, Respondent, vs. Crowley, City Clerk, Appellant.

*April 14*

May *11, 1948.*

*533
      *Richard S. Hippenmeyer*of Waukesha, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Lowry & Hunter*of Waukesha, and oral argument by *Richard N. Hunter.*

Bablow, J.

The members of the court are equally divided upon this appeal, Mr. Justice Fairchild, Mr. Justice Wick-hem, and Mr.-Justice Hughes being of the opinion the judgment should be reversed, and Mr.' Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fritz, and the writer being of the opinion dhe judgment should be affirmed. Under the rule 'the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00526-CV

Truck Insurance Exchange, Appellant

v.

Mid-Continent Casualty Company, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-08-002627, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

I join in the majority’s opinion except for its holding that appellant Truck Insurance

Exchange’s contribution claim against appellee Mid-Continent Casualty Company is barred by

res judicata arising from Mid-Continent’s prior federal court judgment. However, I agree with

the majority that the district court’s summary judgment as to this claim should be affirmed based

on Mid-Continent’s alternative ground that the “other insurance” clauses in the Truck and MidContinent policies negate a right of contribution on the part of Truck against Mid-Continent. See

Mid-Continent Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 236 S.W.3d 765, 772 (Tex. 2007); Employers

Cas. Co. v. Transport Ins. Co., 444 S.W.2d 606, 609 (Tex. 1969); Traders & Gen. Ins. Co. v. Hicks

Rubber Co., 169 S.W.2d 142, 147 (Tex. 1943). Although the Fifth Circuit has recently concluded

that other-insurance clauses apply only to the duty to indemnify and not to the duty to defend,

and thus do not bar a contribution claim for defense costs, see Trinity Universal Ins. Co.
v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co., 592 F.3d 687, 694 (5th Cir. 2010), the controllingTexas Supreme Court

precedents that bind this Court appear to give effect to other-insurance clauses with respect to both

indemnity and defense costs, see Employers, 444 S.W.2d at 607 (“[T]he claim here is for a pro rata

part of the sums paid in settlement of the suit against the insured and as expenses in defending

the suit.”); Hicks, 169 S.W.2d at 597 (“When [one insurer] refused to further assist in the defense

of the . . . suit, [the other co-insurer] shouldered the entire burden, including the appeals . . . . In so

doing it paid out more than two-thirds of the costs and expenses incurred.”). Relying on these

precedents unless and until the supreme court tells us otherwise, I agree with the majority that

Truck’s contribution claim for defense costs is barred as a matter of law.

Accordingly, I join in the judgment and, with these qualifications, the

majority’s opinion.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Filed: August 27, 2010

2