alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DEMPSEY BROWN v. VALENTINE HOOVER.

*Praetiee*— Mortgage—Foreclosure—Jurisdiction,

1. Where, in an action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant in 1801, it appeared that the defendant had obtained a discharge in-Bankruptcy in 1873, aud that the mortgaged premises had been allotted-to him as a homestead by proceedings in the Bankrupt Court; *Reid,*That the plaintiff was entitled to a decree of foreclosure.

2. In such case, the action was properly instituted in tlie State Court.

Civil ActioN, tried at Spring Term, 1877, of DavidsoN Superior Court, before *Kerr, J.*

At the request of the defendant, the plaintiff and one-Charles Hoover became sureties on a bond given by the defendant to one Mendenhall on the 19th of December, I860,, for the sum of $700, and to indemnify . his sureties from all-loss, the defendant executed to them a mortgage on a tract of land, dated the 15th of February, 1861. Shortly after the war Mendenhall brought suit on the bond against the principal and sureties and recovered judgment. Execution issued and the plaintiff wás compelled to pay, and did pay $452.45 of said judgment. On the 22d of April, 1873, the-defendant filed his petition in bankruptcy,^but did-not mention the name of this plaintiff in the list of his creditors, except as one of the parties defendant in the said judgment recovered by Mendenhall, not having had notice of any payment by plaintiff' on said judgment. His discharge in bankruptcy was obtained on the 5th of July, 1873. The plaintiff’s claim was not proved in the Bankrupt Court, and the-land conveyed iu the mortgage was assigned to the defendant as a homestead, under the proceedings in bankruptcy. By this action, which -was commenced on the 5th day off October, 1875, the plaintiff seeks to have the land subjected to the- payment of his debt, in accordance with the terms off *41said mortgage deed. During the pendency of this action-, and after the pleadings were filed, the plaintiff upon petition • to the District Court of the United States obtained leave to proceed in the State Court. Upon these facts, Iiis Honor was-' of opinion with the plaintiff, and gave judgment that the mortgaged premises be sold and the proceeds applied to the debt ef plaintiff. Erom which judgment the defendant appealed.

*Mr. John A.*■Gilmer, for plaintiff.

*Messrs. M. H. Pinnix*and *F. C.*Robbins, for defendant.

Read®, J.

Upon the facts agreed the judgment of the-Court below was clearly right.

The lien created by the mortgage of 1861 was valid as; against the defendant’s claim of homestead. And it was also valid as against the creditors of the defendant and his as-signee in bankruptcy. .

Whether the plaintiff should have sought his rights-through the United States or the State Courts, is of.small-moment to the defendant. ¥e are of the opinion however*, that this procedure in the State Court was right.

There is no error. This will be certified.

PeR CüRiam. .Judgment affirmed...
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-84,841-01

EX P ARTE ALAN JAMA R RICHARD SON, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1212794-A IN THE 182ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Art i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim
. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault and sentenc ed to eleve n year s’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Richardson v. Stat e , No. 01-11-01083-CR (Tex. App. — Houst on [1 Dist.] November 29, 2012) st (not designated f

or publication). Applicant contends that appellate counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use counsel failed to timely

notify Applicant that his conviction had be en af firmed and failed to advise himof2

his right to petition pro sefor discr etionary revie w. Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit with the trial court. Ba sed on that aff idavit, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to advise Applicant that his conviction had been aff irmed and failed to advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionar

y revie w. The trial court rec ommends that relief be grante d. Ex part e W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the First Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 01-11-01083- CR that aff irmed his conviction in C au s e No
. 121279401010 from the 182nd District Court of Har ris County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: April 13, 2016 Do not publish
# Úradný vestník C 178/2016

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 178 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Zväzok 5918. mája 2016 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 178

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Zväzok 5918. mája 2016

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Korigendá |
| 2016/C 178/01 | Korigendum k pozícii Rady v prvom čítaní (EÚ) č. 1/2016 na účely prijatia nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady o Železničnej agentúre Európskej únie, ktorým sa zrušuje nariadenie (ES) č. 881/2004 – Prijatá Radou 10. decembra 2015( Ú. v. EÚ C 56, 12.2.2016 ) | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

Korigendá

2016/C 178/01

Korigendum k pozícii Rady v prvom čítaní (EÚ) č. 1/2016 na účely prijatia nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady o Železničnej agentúre Európskej únie, ktorým sa zrušuje nariadenie (ES) č. 881/2004 – Prijatá Radou 10. decembra 2015( Ú. v. EÚ C 56, 12.2.2016 )

( Ú. v. EÚ C 56, 12.2.2016 )

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

Korigendá

| 18.5.2016 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | C 178/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2016

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

C 178/1

---

Korigendum k pozícii Rady v prvom čítaní (EÚ) č. 1/2016 na účely prijatia nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady o Železničnej agentúre Európskej únie, ktorým sa zrušuje nariadenie (ES) č. 881/2004 – Prijatá Radou 10. decembra 2015

(
  Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 56 z 12. februára 2016
  )

(2016/C 178/01)

Na strane 39 v článku 65 ods. 10:

namiesto:

„10.   Európsky parlament na odporúčanie Rady, uznášajúcej sa kvalifikovanou väčšinou, udelí do 30. apríla roku N + 2 absolutórium výkonnému riaditeľovi v súvislosti s plnením rozpočtu za rok N.“

má byť:

„10.   Európsky parlament na odporúčanie Rady, uznášajúcej sa kvalifikovanou väčšinou, udelí do 15. mája roku N + 2 absolutórium výkonnému riaditeľovi v súvislosti s plnením rozpočtu za rok N.“

---
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO

  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Situs Holdings LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates  Series  2012-CCRE3  (the  "Agreement").  Capitalized  terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of

Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.         A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1,

2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of

March 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober 

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
MD5675, P.O. BOX 619616, DALLAS/FORT WORTH, TEXAS 75261-9616 

Jeffrey A. Ogar Tel: +1.817.967.3478 

Senior Attorney Fax: +1.817.967.2937 

Competition Law/Regulatory Affairs E-mail: jeff.ogar@aa.com 

March 10, 2010 

Renee V. Wright 

Program Manager 

Docket Operations 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

 

Re: American Airlines Confidential Documents 

American/Japan Airlines Antitrust Immunity 

(DOT-OST-2010-0034) 

 

Dear Ms. Wright: 

 American Airlines, Inc. hereby submits additional confidential 

documents in the captioned docket. We request confidential treatment of 

these documents in accordance with our Rule 12 motion of February 12, 

2010, which we incorporate herein by reference. A public index is 

attached. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 

 CARL B. NELSON, JR. 

 R. BRUCE WARK 

 JEFFREY A. OGAR 

 American Airlines, Inc. 

 1101 17th Street, N.W. 

 Washington, D.C. 20036 

 (202) 496-5647 

 carl.nelson@aa.com 

 bruce.wark@aa.com 

 jeff.ogar@aa.com 

cc: Todd Homan 

 Peter Irvine 

 Keith Glatz 

 Grady Stone 

 Service list 
SUPPLEMENTAL INDEX

Bates Range: Description: 

AA_006850-AA_006879 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_006880-AA_006949 AA/JL FFP Agreement 

AA_006950-AA_006957 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_006958-AA_006981 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_006982-AA_006990 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_006991-AA_007001 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007002-AA_007023 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007024-AA_007032 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007033-AA_007043 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007044-AA_007065 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007066-AA_007083 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007084-AA_007087 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007088-AA_007118 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007119-AA_007149 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007150-AA_007159 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007160-AA_007184 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007185-AA_007215 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007216-AA_007233 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

AA_007234-AA_007319 AA/JL Codeshare Agreement 

AA_007320-AA_007386 AA/JL FFP Agreement 

AA_007387-AA_007392 AA/JL Codeshare Amendment 

CD-ROM MIDT Data
##### 



S1 Subsidiaries
    
    State/Jurisdiction of IncorporationsFinancial Information Consulting Services Group N.V.
Mosaic Software Holdings, Ltd
Postilion, Inc
Postilion International Limited
Postilion International (Pty), Ltd.
Regency Systems, Inc
S1, Inc.
S1 Belgium N.V.
S1 Corporation (S) PTE Limited
S1 Deutschland GmbH
S1 Enterprise, Inc.
S1 Enterprise Europe, Ltd
S1 Europe Holdings C.V.A
S1 Greater China Limited
S1 Holdings, LLC
S1 Ireland Ltd.
S1 Real Estate Holdings, LLC
S1 Services India Pvt. Ltd.
S1 Tech Services, Ltd.
S1 UK Ltd
Software Dynamics, Incorporated
Temple Acquisition Corporation
X/Net Associates, Inc.
    
    Belgium Corporation
UK Corporation
Florida Corporation
UK Corporation
South Africa Corporation
Texas Corporation
Kentucky Corporation
Belgium Corporation
Singapore Corporation
Germany Corporation
Delaware Corporation
UK Corporation
Belgium Corporation
Hong Kong Corporation
Delaware LLC
Ireland Corporation
Delaware Corporation
India Corporation
Thailand Corporation
UK Corporation
California Corporation
Delaware Corporation
New York Corporation
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350),
the undersigned, Corey M. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the year December 31, 2007 of the Company
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


/S/ COREY M. HOROWITZ
----------------------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN
APRIL 10, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BANC CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          31,825
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,862
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,843
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     65,439
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,477
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,411
<LOANS>                                        632,777
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 827,427
<DEPOSITS>                                     682,517
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,399
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,163
<LONG-TERM>                                     62,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 827,427
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 49,244
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,550
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   485
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                55,557
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              24,101
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,749
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,266
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,850
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  83
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 28,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,440
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,440
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,920
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.48
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,097
<LOANS-PAST>                                       575
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    58
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,466
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,792
<RECOVERIES>                                       950
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,065
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,065
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

TRAVIS M. CARROLL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 936

[August 9, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Samantha Schosberg Feuer , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 50

- 2008

- CF001781

- AXXX

- MB and 50

- 2009

- CF

- 010016

- AXXX

- MB

.
Travis M. Carroll, South Bay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Senior Assist ant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Appellant Travis Carroll appeals the trial court’ s order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) . Appellant is corr ect, and the State agrees, that the trial court erred in failing to enter separate sentencing orders for each count in his underlying cases. Holmes v. State , 100 So. 3d 281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ; Brazley v. State , 871 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) . We

rever se and remand for the trial court to correct the sentencing documents. Appellant need not be present for this ministerial act. Jordan v. State , 143 So. 3d 335, 339 (Fla. 2014) ; Bowen v. State , 196 So. 3d 567 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) ; see also Jordan v. State, 42 Fla. L . Weekly D897 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 19, 2017)

.

Reversed and remanded.

M AY , L EVINE and F ORST , JJ., concur.2 * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
383 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-47, K2025-46.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24039 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

CHRISTOPHER ADIN GRAHAM, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-30237 

D.C. No. 3:12-cr-00178-MO-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 21, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Adin Graham appeals from the district court’s order denying his 

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand. 

After the district court’s decision denying relief and the parties’ briefing on 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-30237 

appeal, this court held that the current version of U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 is not binding 

as applied to § 3582(c)(1)(A) motions brought by prisoners. See United States v. 

Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 2021) (“The Sentencing Commission’s 

statements in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 may inform a district court’s discretion for 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motions filed by a defendant, but they are not binding.”). Because 

the district court provided no explanation for its decision to deny Graham’s 

motion, we cannot determine whether it relied on U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 in denying 

relief. Therefore, we vacate and remand so that the district court can reassess 

Graham’s motion for compassionate release under the standard set forth in Aruda. 

See id. 

We offer no views as to the merits of Graham’s § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion, and 

we need not reach his remaining arguments on appeal. 

VACATED and REMANDED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 454 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 454

To amend title 28, United States Code, to authorize the appointment of 
  additional bankruptcy judges for the judicial district of Maryland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 1999

 Mr. Sarbanes (for himself and Ms. Mikulski) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to authorize the appointment of 
  additional bankruptcy judges for the judicial district of Maryland.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BANKRUPTCY JUDGESHIPS.

    In section 152(a)(2) of title 28, United States Code, in the item 
relating to the judicial district of Maryland, strike ``4'' and insert 
``8''.
                                 <all>
```