alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TSD for U.S. EPA’s Proposed Numeric Nutrient Criteria for FL Inland Surface Fresh Waters

Appendix B-4: Statistical Analysis of Nutrient Water Quality 

Parameters by Florida Watersheds 
TSD for U.S. EPA’s Proposed Numeric Nutrient Criteria for FL Inland Surface Fresh Waters

B4-1 

Appendix B-4. Statistical Analysis of Nutrient Water Quality Parameters by 

Florida Watersheds 

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) used nutrient water quality data 

collected across Florida and contained within Florida’s Impaired Waters Rule (IWR) database. 

Data tables of nutrient water quality sampling stations and their associated waterbody IDs 

(WBID) were joined to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal 

Assessment Framework (CAF) delineation of estuarine drainage areas (EDAs), fluvial drainage 

areas (FDAs), and coastal drainage areas (CDAs). WBID centroids were joined to the CAF so 

that all stations in WBIDs were also mapped to an EDA, FDA, or CDA. Stations that were 

identified in the IWR database as Stream or Blackwater and had corresponding total nitrogen 

(TN) and total phosphorus (TP) data were identified and aggregated by EDA, FDA, or CDA. 

This resulted in approximately 145,000 paired observations or sampling events distributed in 

watershed stream networks across Florida. The mean, distributional statistics of all observations 

and the median molar TN:TP ratio were computed for each watershed are shown in a summary 

table in Chapter 2a. “Detailed data for each drainage area are also available for TP and TN, but 

are too extensive to be included here. The data have been included in the following docket: 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0596: Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Lakes and Flowing 

Waters 

The data are associated with docket document number, EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0596-0002, and can 

be found in the following file: “FL_IWR_Estuary_Database.mdb”.
Exhibit 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, James E. Lesch, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Lesch     
|                    |  |     |  | James E. Lesch         
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



15
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Pinchas Althaus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Dominion Minerals Corp. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dominion Minerals Corp.    /s/ Pinchas Althaus Pinchas Althaus Chief Executive Officer and President  May 20, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Security Bank Corporation (the Company) for the
period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the Report), Tony E. Collins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. McLemore, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009                                  
|                                                    
|/s/ Tony E. Collins                                 
|Tony E. Collins                                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                                                    
|Date: May 11, 2009                                  
|                                                    
|/s/ James R. McLemore, Jr.                          
|James R. McLemore, Jr.                              
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 11, 2016

NO. 03-15-00702-CR

Wesley Eugene Perkins, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 437 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 56
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 437

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 333 Las 
 Vegas Boulevard South in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Lloyd D. George 
                      United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 22, 1999

  Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. Bryan) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                             March 17, 1999

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 333 Las 
 Vegas Boulevard South in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Lloyd D. George 
                      United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LLOYD D. GEORGE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 333 Las Vegas 
Boulevard South in Las Vegas, Nevada, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lloyd D. George 
United States Courthouse''.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 56

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 437

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 333 Las 
 Vegas Boulevard South in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Lloyd D. George 
                      United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 17, 1999

                       Reported without amendment
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WAS HINGTON , D
. C
. 2046 0 

## APl i 7 20 11

OfFICE O F C HE MICAL SAFETY AN D POLLUTION PREVEN TION 

### MEMORANDUM S UBJECT:
FROM:

THR U :

TO: BEAD C hem i c al Profile fo r Regi s tration Rev iew: I miprothrin ( 004006)
Colwe ll Cook, E ntomologi s t 

## ( Me.)- Bi o l ogica l Ana lysis B ranch '-
. 

# f.# Rafael Prieto, Enviro nme nt 

### S pec i a li st Sc ience I nformation an d

# Ar**~~:C** Derek Berwald, Econom ist 

# Otrr 

# f':1.- 

# w Economic Analysis Branch " 

### Bi ological and Econom ic**on-05 3P**  Arnet J ones , C hief

# /~r B io logica l Analy sis

### Bran**R- .~**  .. A
...... Diann Sims , C h i e f

# M.~ Sc ie nce I nformation an d Ar

### a~IY**Si** B ranch T imothy K iely, C hief E conomic A nalysis Br anch 

### \,f\lI...., Biologica l and Eco nomic Ana ly s i i vision (7 E ri c O ls o n . Chem ical Rev iew Manage r R isk Management an d I mpl ementation B ranch 4 Pes ticide Re- Eva luation Di visio n (7508P ) 

### BEAD Pr od uct Review Panel date: March 16, 2011 INTROD UCTIO N The purpose of th is d ocument is to convey us age inf ormat ion and a broad o verview of the pest managem ent ro le s o f pe st icides that are be g inning t o undergo regi stra ti o n r eview. The ant ic ipated aud ience c o n sists of the te am 0 :: E P A s taff curre ntly ev a luating th e re gi str ation s ta tus of i mipro thrin (00400 6), an d ev entually th e ge neral pu blic
. Thi s d ocument b u ilds upon the d ata already pro vided in th e " Usag e and Labe l Us e Da ta P ackages" tha t are a lso p rovide d toRe gis tra t ion Review teams b y BEAD
. The c.oc ume nt is b as ed o n inf ormation a nd da t a ava ila ble 10 B EAD 

### as of Mar ch 11 , 2011. l mipr othrin is a sy nthetic p yrethroid th at h as in door, no n - f ood us es . It i s typically appl ied as a spo t t re atmen t in re sidences an d n on -f ood a reas of re st auran ts, sc hoo ls, w arehouses , and h otels. It a pp l ie d t o c on trol a w id e ra n g e of i ns e cts, includin g c ockroaches , an t s , s i l verfi s h, c ricke ts a nd s piders (E P A Fac t Sh ee t )
. USE SI TES Imiprothrin i s reg i stered t o be u sed b y h om eowners t o 

### c o ntrol a v a rie ty of in s ect pe sts in a nd ar ou nd t h eir hom e s. Imip rothri n i s a l so l a b eled f o r u se i n non -food a rea s o fr c s ta ura nt s , s c hool s, w arehouses, a nd hotel s. C O MM O N FO RM ULATI ON S AN D A P PLI C ATI O N ME THO DS Im iprothrin i s f orm ulated as a so lution-read y t o u se and al so as a p re ssurize d liqui d. USAG E B EAD w as u nable t o l ocate any u sage data i n any of o ur currently availab le u sage d a tabases
. HI S TOR Y OF B EA D A SS ESSMENTS F O R IMIPR O THRI N B EAD was u n ab le t o loca t e p reviou s review s re garding im iprothrin
. D A T A N EEDS RE L E VANT TO B EA D' S · F UTUR E WORK O N IMI P RO TH RI N At thi s time BE AD a nticip ates no d ata nee d: • . R EF ER ENC E S E PA Pe st i c id e Fac t She et I mipro thrin
. Loc ated a t : http : //w v,w . ep a . gov / opprdOOI/ facts heet slim prothrin
. pd 

### f



### 2
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter  Ended  February 28, 2009 (the  "Report") by
Progressive  Training,  Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned  hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




April 13, 2009                          By:  /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Buddy Young
                                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                             Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                             ADFLEX SOLUTIONS, INC.

           EXHIBIT (11.1) - COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended
                                                      June 30,             June 30,
                                                  ----------------     ----------------
                                                   1997      1996       1997      1996
                                                  ------    ------     ------    ------
<S>                                               <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>   
Net income (loss)                                 $1,880    $ (660)    $2,752    $  179
                                                  ======    ======     ======    ======
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:

    Common shares outstanding                      8,682     8,579      8,674     8,555
    Common equivalent shares representing
        shares issuable upon exercise of stock
        options (1)                                  118        --        110        64
                                                  ------    ------     ------    ------
             Total weighted average shares -
                 primary                           8,800     8,579      8,784     8,619
                                                  ======    ======     ======    ======
             Total weighted average shares -
                 fully diluted                     8,800     8,579      8,784     8,619
                                                  ======    ======     ======    ======
Primary net income (loss) per common and
    common equivalent share                       $  .21    $ (.08)    $  .31    $  .02
                                                  ======    ======     ======    ======
Fully diluted net income(loss) per common
    and common equivalent share                   $  .21    $ (.08)    $  .31    $  .02
                                                  ======    ======     ======    ======
</TABLE>

----------
(1) Amount calculated using the treasury stock method and fair market values
for stock.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,538-01

In re STATE OF TEXAS ex. rel. RANDALL SIMS, Relator

ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

A PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

IN CAUSE NO. 39532-D

IN THE 320TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

POTTER COUNTY

Newell, J. filed a dissenting opinion.

I wrote a concurring statement to a show cause order in In re State

ex rel. Risinger. The Court issued the show cause order in that case

1

because the attorneys representing Raphael Deon Holiday filed an

untimely motion to withdraw the warrant of execution in their client’s

death penalty case. In my concurring statement, I expressed my view

2

479 S.W.3d 250, 255 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015) (Newell, J. concurring).

1

Id.

2
Sims Dissenting --- 2

that the State would have been entitled to mandamus relief if the decision

were based solely upon the issue of a trial court’s failure to comply with

the requirements of Article 43.141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3

However, I also explained why I had ultimately voted to deny

mandamus relief in the underlying case. It is at least unsettled whether

trial courts have inherent authority that is independent of statutes and

which allows trial courts to modify or rescind their own orders. Under

4

the Texas Constitution, district courts are invested with inherent authority

to execute their own judgments. And, in addition to express grants of

5

power conferred by constitution, statute, or common law, courts have

inherent and implied powers that provide a much broader foundation

upon which to act.

6

I believe that reasoning applies equally in this case even though the

Court is considering the application of a different statute related to the

setting of an execution date. I vote to deny mandamus relief and I

Id. at 260.

3

Id. at 262.

4

See Kelly v. State, 676 S.W.2d 104, 107 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984).

5

See State v. Patrick, 86 S.W.3d 592, 601 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002) (Cochran, J.,

6

dissenting); see also Tex. Gov’t. Code § 21.001(a) (setting out that a court has

“all powers necessary for the exercise of its jurisdiction and the enforcement of

its lawful orders, including the authority to issue the writs and orders necessary

or proper in aid of its jurisdiction.”).
Sims Dissenting --- 3

respectfully dissent.

Filed: February 8, 2023

Do Not Publish
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with the quarterly report of Amiworld, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: November 13, 2008 | s/ Ingrely Veitia___________________   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------|

|   | Ingrely Veitia, Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of clickNsettle.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three and six months ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Form 10-QSB"), I, Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

            (1) The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

            (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Dated: February 11, 2005


/s/ Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume
-------------------------------------------
Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume - Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


                                       29
No. 01-14-00072-CR

No. 01-14-00073-CR

In the 

Court of Appeals

for the 

First District of Texas

At Houston 



No. 1233998 

No. 1401120

In the 185

th District Court 

Of Harris County, Texas 



LARRY RICHARD 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

Appellee 



STATE’S THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

IN WHICH TO FILE AN APPELLATE BRIEF 



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules 

10.5(b)(1) and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this 

ACCEPTED

01-14-00073-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

1/26/2015 9:16:03 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/26/2015 9:16:03 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
motion for an extension of time in which to file the State’s brief in this cause, and, 

in support thereof, presents the following:

1. Appellant was convicted of the felony offense of aggravated assault. 

2. The State’s brief was due on January 26, 2015.

4. An extension of time in which to file the State’s brief is requested until 

February 25, 2015. 

5. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for the requested 

extension:

i. The attorney previously assigned to this appeal is no longer 

with the Harris County District Attorney’s Office. The 

undersigned attorney was assigned to this appeal on January 26, 

2015. 

ii. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation 

of the State’s Brief in Cause No. 14-14-00139-CR, Isaac Smith, 

Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee.

iii. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation 

of the State’s Brief in Cause No. 01-12-01175-CR, Mark 

Rascoe, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee.

iv. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation 

of the State’s Brief in Cause No. 01-12-00422-CR, Benjamin 

Maurine Sadler, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee. 

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant an additional 

extension of time until February 25, 2015 in which to file the State’s brief in this 

cause.
Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Heather A. Hudson

HEATHER A. HUDSON

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

State Bar No. 24058991

hudson_heather@dao.hctx.net

curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been submitted 

for service by e-filing to the following address:

Deborah Summers

P11210 Steeplecrest, Ste. 120

Houston, Texas 77065

Tel: (281) 897-9600

summerspc@sbcglobal.net

/s/ Heather A. Hudson

HEATHER A. HUDSON

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

State Bar No. 24058991

Date: January 26, 2015