alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, J. T. Malugen, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form l0-Q of Movie Gallery, Inc.;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 (b)      evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)          disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

(a)          allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 13, 2004 |
|----------------------------------|
|                             |
|                             |
| /s/  J. T. Malugen          |   |
| J. T. Malugen                    |
| Chief Executive Officer          |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2182

MARYANN LAREMONT-LOPEZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTHEASTERN TIDEWATER OPPORTUNITY PROJECT,

Defendant - Appellee,

SUANNE LEIGH HARDEE; THOMAS F. HENNESSY,

Movants.

No. 98-2217

MARYANN LAREMONT-LOPEZ,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SOUTHEASTERN TIDEWATER OPPORTUNITY PROJECT,

Defendant - Appellant,

SUANNE LEIGH HARDEE; THOMAS F. HENNESSY,

Movants.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-96-1202-2)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 3, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maryann Laremont-Lopez, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Gorry, III,

John Hume Taylor, Jr., TAYLOR & WALKER, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked “filed” on

July 7, 1998, the court’s docket discloses that it was entered on

the docket sheet on July 8, 1998. We accept that date as the

effective date of the district court’s decision pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

3

PER CURIAM:

Maryann Laremont-Lopez appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion for rehearing or modification of decision.

Cross-Appellant Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project appeals

a portion of the same district court order denying the award of

attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Laremont-Lopez v.

Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project, No. CA-96-1202-2 (E.D.

Va. July 8, 1998).* We deny Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity

Project’s motion to dismiss the appeal in 98-2182. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                October 11, 2007 | /s/                Thomas K. Rouse                      |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Thomas                K. Rouse, Chief Financial Officer |
|                                  | Principal                Financial Officer              |

----

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24612]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
390 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-89, K2025-87.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24612 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT
32.2














CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I,
William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the hi/fn, inc.
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of hi/fn, inc.








November
      14, 2008
            /s/ WILLIAM R. WALKERWilliam
      R. WalkerChief
      Financial Officer
Slip-Op 03- 44 UNITED STATES COURT OF I NTERNATIONAL

TRADE

____________________________________ : UNI TED STATE S, : : Plaintiff, : : Before: WALLACH, J udge v. : Court No.: 00-07-00329 : : CARNATION CREATI ONS, INC., : JAMES PENG, a/k/a WEN CHIN PENG, : a/k/a WEN C. CHEN, ANGELA CHEN : a/k/a SHU-MEI CHEN, and : E&T FA SHIO

N, IN C. : : Defend ant. :

:

____________________________________ : Order and Judgment Upon cons ideration of the pa rties’ Join t Stipulatio n For the

Entry of Judgme

nt (“Par ties’ Stipulation”), the Court having reviewed the papers and ple adings on file herein, and after due deliberation, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGEDand DECRE ED that jud gment be and here by i s entere d in favor of the United States and against Def endants E&T Fashion, I

nc., Angela Chen a/k/a ShuMei Chen, and James Peng a/k/a Wen Chin Peng a/k/a Wen C. Chen, jointly a nd severally, in the amount of $128, 756, inclusive of interest; and it is further ORDERED th at each

party shall bea r its own c osts, expen ses, and a ttorney fees.

__________________________ Evan J . Wal lach, Judge

Dated: April 23, 2003

New York, New York
#### State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Jack Corey, Appellant.

April 3, 1928.

*1043
      *Sullivan & Sullivm,*for appellant.

*John Fletcher,*Attorney-general, *F. W. Edwards,*County Attorney, and *Ralph William Travis,*Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

Kindig, J.

— In this ease, the State chose to proceed under Section 1936 of the 1927 Code, rather than Section 1945-al, or some other applicable'provision of the same Code.

A review of Sections 1934 to 1943 thereof, both inclusive, reveals the fact that the offense here charged necessitates: First, a consignor and consignee; second, the transportation; and third,' the lack of proper marks or labels. *State v. Edwards,*205 Iowa 587, and *State v. Drain,*205 Iowa 581.

However, the record before ns discloses no proof that there was a consignor or consignee for the intoxicating liquors in controversy, as contemplated by said legislative enactments; nor is there any showing that there was a “transportation,” within the purview of that law. Consequently, the State did not establish its case. No benefit-will result from a restatement of the-discussion contained in the *Edwards*and *Drain*eases.

Because of the holdings under those authorities, the judgment of the trial court must be, and is, *reversed.*— Reversed.

Stevens, C. J., and Evans, Faville, De Graff, Albert, Morling, and Wagner, JJ., concur.
Order filed April 10, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-12-00020-CV

____________

GILBERT GILES, Appellant

V.

SHUNDA GILES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1997-47863

O R D E R

According to the notice of appeal, this is an appeal from a dismissal order signed 

November 10, 2011. The clerk’s record was filed April 3, 2012. 

Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s 

record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the dismissal order 

signed November 10, 2011.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record 

within 14 days of the date of this order, containing the dismissal order signed November 

10, 2011.
2

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a 

part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James R. Buscemi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|/s/ James R. Buscemi   
|-----------------------
|James R. Buscemi       
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|August 12, 2008
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 30, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00673

- CV

Thelma GARZA et al, Appel lant

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY

,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CV01903

Honorable Melissa Vara , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On November 29, 2022, appellant filed an emergency motion, seeking to stay execution of a writ of possession. Because appellant did not file the mandatory supersedeas bond, this court cannot grant the requested relief. See T EX

. P ROP

. C ODE § 24.007 (“A judgment of a county court may not under any circumstances be stayed pending appeal unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas bond in an amount set by the county court.”); Marshall v. Housing Authority of City of San Antonio , 198 S.W.3d 782, 786

- 87 (Tex. 2006).

Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of November, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I,
Omer Bar-Yohai certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to my knowledge, that:



1.
This Annual Report on Form 20-F of R.V.B. Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2015
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date:  February
9, 2017 | /s/ Omer Bar-Yohai     
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|                        | Omer Bar-Yohai         
|                        | Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice: 24-073]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a meeting of the NASA International Space Station Advisory Committee. The purpose of the meeting is to review aspects related to the safety and operational readiness of the International Space Station.

# DATES:

November 13, 2024, 10-11:00 a.m. All times are eastern time.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Public attendance will be virtual only. See dial-in and Webinar information below under                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dennis McSweeney, Designated Federal Officer, ISS Advisory Committee, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, via email at                         *dennis.mcsweeney@nasa.gov*                         or at 202-834-7351.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

As noted above, this meeting will be open to the public via Webinar and telephonically. Webinar connectivity information is provided below. For audio, when you join the Webinar event, you may use your computer to join or call the U.S. toll conference number listed.

                    November 13, 2024, link:                     *https://teams.microsoft.com/​l/​meetup-join/​19%3ameeting_​NjcwNWIxYTktYjMyYy00OWIwLWI1Y2ItZDBmZjg3OGRkYmYx%40thread.v2/​0?​context=​%7b%22Tid%22%3a%227005d458-45be-48ae-8140-d43da96dd17b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22453f1a86-a177-4251-b896-a3c23cc1a9a1%22%7d*.                

Meeting ID: 276 024 759 223, Passcode: Ktdm9N, Call in number (audio only): +1 256-715-9946, Phone conference ID: 450362467#.

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this day to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Jamie M. Krauk,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2024-24769 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
EXHIBIT 10.27(a)

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.

Summary of Compensation Arrangement for Certain Executive Officers

Exhibit 10.27(b) lists the executives for which this Exhibit 10.27(a) applies. In addition, Exhibit 10.27(b) sets forth the annualized base salary and
target bonus percentage for such named executive officers.Additional employees other than the executives set forth in Exhibit 10.27(b) may have the same or similar compensation as set forth in this Exhibit 10.27(a) and in Exhibit 10.27(b).

Description of Compensation for Certain Executive Officers

Each such executive officers compensation package consists of three elements:



| |  |  | base compensation, which compensates for the underlying job;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | variable or bonus compensation, which rewards based on the achievement of financial and individual performance goals; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | equity-based incentive compensation, which rewards for Magmas growth and increased stockholder value.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to the above, each such executive officer is eligible to participate in various employee benefit plans, including (without limitation) 401(k)
plans , life, disability, health, accident and other insurance programs, paid vacations, and similar plans or programs, subject in each case to the generally applicable terms and conditions of the applicable plan or program.

Each such executive officers employment is at-will.

Employment, Severance and Change of Control Agreements

Magma does not have formal employment or severance agreements with
any of the executive officers set forth in Exhibit 10.27(b) except that Magma has agreed to pay to Mr. Peter S. Teshima a severance amount equal to six months of Mr. Teshimas initial annual base salary (which initial
annual base salary was $200,000.00) if Mr. Teshimas employment with Magma is involuntarily terminated without Cause. Such executive officers are parties to stock option agreements that provide for acceleration of vesting upon specified
events.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pinpoint Recovery Solutions Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
Kevin Cappock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




May 14,
2009





S/ KEVIN CAPPOCKKevin
      Cappock, Chief Executive Officer




[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pinpoint Recovery Solutions Corp. and will be retained by Pinpoint Recovery
Solutions Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]