alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2732

To ensure that all States participating in the National Boll Weevil Eradication

Program are treated equitably.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 15, 2000

Mr. GRAMM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To ensure that all States participating in the National Boll

Weevil Eradication Program are treated equitably.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Boll Weevil Eradi5 cation Equity Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress finds that—

8 (1) as of the date of enactment of this Act, in9 festation by Anthonomus grandis (commonly known

10 as the ‘‘boll weevil’’) has caused more than
2

•S 2732 IS

1 $15,000,000,000 in damage to cotton crops of the

2 United States and costs cotton producers in the

3 United States approximately $300,000,000 annually;

4 (2) through the National Boll Weevil Eradi5 cation Program (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘pro6 gram’’), the Animal and Plant Health Inspection

7 Service of the Department of Agriculture partners

8 with producers to provide technical assistance and

9 Federal cost share funds to States in an effort to

10 eradicate the boll weevil;

11 (3) States that enrolled in the program before

12 1994 have since been able to complete boll weevil

13 eradication and were provided a Federal cost share

14 that accounted for an average of 26.9 percent of the

15 total cost of eradication;

16 (4) States that enrolled in the program in or

17 after 1994 account for 65 percent of the national

18 cotton acreage and are now provided an average

19 Federal cost share of only 4 percent, placing a tre20 mendous financial burden on the individual pro21 ducers;

22 (5) the addition of vast acreage into the pro23 gram has resulted in an increased need for Federal

24 cost share funds;
3

•S 2732 IS

1 (6) a producer that participates in the program

2 today deserves not less than the same level of com3 mitment that was provided to producers that en4 rolled in the program before 1994; and

5 (7) the ability of all States to eradicate the boll

6 weevil would prevent further migration of the boll

7 weevil to boll weevil-free areas and reintroduction of

8 the boll weevil in those areas having completed boll

9 weevil eradication.

10 SEC. 3. BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION ASSISTANCE.

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi12 sion of law, the Secretary of Agriculture shall provide

13 funds to pay at least 26.9 percent of the total program

14 costs incurred by producers participating in the program.

15 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

16 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act

17 such sums as are necessary for fiscal years 2001 through

18 2004.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2


                  Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C  Section  1350, as Adopted
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  clickNsettle.com,   Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the "Form
10-QSB"), I, Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

      (1)   The Form 10-QSB  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated:  November 9, 2006


/s/ Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume
-------------------------------------------
Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume - Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
OAKWOOD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
                          ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                        OAKWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC.
                  SENIOR/SUBORDINATED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 1998-B

Pursuant  to Section  3.13(a) of the  Standard  Terms to Pooling  and  Servicing
Agreement  (November  1995  Edition)  which is  incorporated  in the Pooling and
Servicing  Agreement dated May 1, 1998 among Oakwood Mortgage  Investors,  Inc.,
Oakwood  Acceptance  Corporation  (the  "Servicer")  and  PNC  Bank,  N.A.,  the
undersigned  officer  of the  Servicer  hereby  certifies  that a review  of the
activities of the Servicer  during the period October 1, 1997 through  September
30, 1998 and of its  performance  under the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement has
been made under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge,  based on such
review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled all its  obligations  under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement through such period.



By:  /s/ Douglas R. Muir

Name:  Douglas R. Muir

Title:  Vice President

Date:  September 30, 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment), Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of addition of a company to the Section 1260H List of Chinese Military Companies Operating in the United States.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Deputy Secretary of Defense has determined that the entity listed in the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section of this notice qualifies as a “Chinese military company” in accordance with the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Devante Brown (GIES), (703) 695-8545.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Section 1260H of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Pub. L. 116-283) requires the Secretary of Defense to make additions or deletions to the most recent list of “Chinese military companies” on an ongoing basis based on the latest information. Paragraph (b)(2) of this section requires the Secretary of Defense to publish the unclassified portion of such list in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

                    The Deputy Secretary of Defense has determined that the following entity qualifies as a “Chinese military                           ( print page 84548)                        company” in accordance with Section 1260H:                

Hesai Technology Co., Ltd. (Hesai)

Dated: October 21, 2024.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2024-24723 Filed 10-21-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 506 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 506

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
   provisions which allow nonrefundable personal credits to be fully 
                 allowed against regular tax liability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 1999

 Mrs. Lincoln (for herself, Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Kerrey, Ms. 
  Landrieu, and Mr. Cochran) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
   provisions which allow nonrefundable personal credits to be fully 
                 allowed against regular tax liability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NONREFUNDABLE PERSONAL CREDITS FULLY ALLOWED AGAINST REGULAR 
              TAX LIABILITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 26(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to limitation based on amount of tax) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(a) Limitation Based on Amount of Tax.--The aggregate amount of 
credits allowed by this subpart for the taxable year shall not exceed 
the taxpayer's regular tax liability for the taxable year.''
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 24(d) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph (2) and by redesignating 
paragraph (3) as paragraph (2).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered October 9, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01291-CR

EX PARTE TONY YUAN LI

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-80387-2013

ORDER

The Court has received appellant’s notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying 

appellant the relief sought by his article 11.072 application for writ of habeas corpus. This is an 

accelerated criminal appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 31.

We ORDER the Collin County Clerk to file, by OCTOBER 28, 2014, the clerk’s record 

containing all of the documents related to the article 11.072 application for writ of habeas 

corpus, including: (1) the application for writ of habeas corpus; (2) the State’s response; (3) the 

trial court’s order ruling on the application; (4) any findings of fact and conclusions of law; and

(5) the trial court’s rule 25.2 certification of appellant’s right to appeal. Because this is an 

accelerated appeal, no extensions will be granted.

We ORDER Antoinette Varela, as official court reporter of the County Court at Law No. 

5, to file, by OCTOBER 28, 2014, the reporter’s record, including all exhibits, of the August 28, 

2014 hearing on the application for writ of habeas corpus. If Ms. Varela did not record the 
proceedings, she is ORDERED to coordinate with the court reporter who did record the 

proceedings for the filing of the record. Because this is an accelerated appeal, no extensions will 

be granted.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by NOVEMBER 12, 2014. We ORDER the 

State to file its brief by NOVEMBER 26, 2014. If any party does not file its brief by the date 

specified, the appeal will be submitted without that party’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1.

The appeal will be submitted without argument on December 19, 2014 to a panel 

consisting of Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1, 39.1.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Dan Wilson, Presiding Judge, County Court at Law No. 5; Antoinette Varela, official 

court reporter, County Court at Law No. 5; Stacy Kemp, Collin County Clerk; and to counsel for 

all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1878
LARRY BARNES, SR., M.D., J.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOWE’S COMPANIES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1040-5-BO) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Barnes, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert W. Sumner, KariRusswurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barnes v. Lowe’s Companies, Inc. , No. CA-97-1040-5-BO (E.D.N.C. May 14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6011

STEVEN LOUIS BARNES, a/k/a Steve, a/k/a Big Man,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CAROL G. THUEME, Court Reporter; COURT ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (5:13-cv-02349-RMG)

Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Louis Barnes appeals the district court’s 

orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and 

denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Barnes v. Thueme, No. 

5:13-cv-02349-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 25 & Dec. 2, 2013). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 503

AN ACT

Designating certain land in the San Isabel National Forest

in the State of Colorado as the ‘‘Spanish Peaks Wilderness’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spanish Peaks Wilder5 ness Act of 2000’’.
2

S 503 ES

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SPANISH PEAKS WILDERNESS.

2 (a) COLORADO WILDERNESS ACT.—Section 2(a) of

3 the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (Public Law 103–

4 77; 107 Stat. 756; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note) is amended by

5 adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(20) SPANISH PEAKS WILDERNESS.—Certain

7 land in the San Isabel National Forest that—

8 ‘‘(A) comprises approximately 18,000

9 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled

10 ‘Proposed Spanish Peaks Wilderness’, dated

11 February 10, 1999; and

12 ‘‘(B) shall be known as the ‘Spanish Peaks

13 Wilderness’.’’.

14 (b) MAP; BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION.—

15 (1) FILING.—As soon as practicable after the

16 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agri17 culture (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’),

18 shall file a map and boundary description of the

19 area designated under subsection (a) with—

20 (A) the Committee on Resources of the

21 House of Representatives; and

22 (B) the Committee on Energy and Natural

23 Resources of the Senate.

24 (2) FORCE AND EFFECT.—The map and bound25 ary description under paragraph (1) shall have the

26 same force and effect as if included in the Colorado
3

S 503 ES

1 Wilderness act of 1993 (Public Law 103–77; 107

2 Stat. 756), except that the Secretary may correct

3 clerical and typographical errors in the map and

4 boundary description.

5 (3) AVAILABILITY.—The map and boundary de6 scription under paragraph (1) shall be on file and

7 available for public inspection in the Office of the

8 Chief of the Forest Service.

9 SEC. 3. ACCESS.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall allow the con11 tinuation of historic uses of the Bulls Eye Mine Road es12 tablished before the date of enactment of this Act, subject

13 to such terms and conditions as the Secretary may pro14 vide.

15 (b) PRIVATELY OWNED LAND.—Access to any pri16 vately owned land within the wilderness areas designated

17 under section 2 shall be provided in accordance with sec18 tion 5 of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1134 et seq.).
4

S 503 ES

1 SEC. 4. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

2 Section 10 of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993

3 (Public Law 103–77; 107 Stat. 756; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note)

4 is repealed.

Passed the Senate April 13, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 503

AN ACT

Designating certain land in the San Isabel National

Forest in the State of Colorado as the ‘‘SpanishPeaks Wilderness’’.
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. John M. Coonan, Appellant.

Intoxicating Liquors: original package house : nuisance. The defendant, as agent for parties residing in Wisconsin, received from the latter at the town of Spencer, in this state, consignments of intoxicating liquors, which had been put up in bottles, sealed, labeled and packed in boxes or barrels, for convenience of shipment, in Wisconsin. The liquors thus received were removed ; from the boxes or barrels, and were kept for sale and sold by the defendant in said town, in the sealed bottles, which were not permitted to be opened upon the premises. *Held,*that such sales were by original packages,. and, being made prior to the enactment of the act of August 8, 1890, the Fifty-first Congress, 26 St. 318, were not illegal under the provisions of chapter 143 of the Acts of the Twentieth General Assembly.

*Appeal from, Q lay District Court.*— Hon. Lot Thomas, Judge.

Wednesday, May 13, 1891.

j This is an action in equity' to enjoin tbe defendant from maintaining a nuisance by keeping intoxicating liquors for sale contrary to law. Notice was given of tbe application for an injunction, and a bearing was bad, and a temporary injunction was granted. Tbe defendant *appeals.*

Reversed.

*B. B.*Kelley, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Kotheock, J.

Tbe defendant was tbe keeper of wbat was known as an “original package bouse,” at Spencer, in Clay county. He was not tbe owner of the packages of liquor which be kept for sale, but was tbe agent of certain parties in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. These parties were lessees of tbe building, and tbe same was occupied by tbe defendant as their agent. They *401shipped the liquors kept for sale in said building' from Milwaukee to Spencer, Iowa, consigned to themselves; and the defendant received them as the agent of said Milwaukee parties. The beer which was kept for sale was put up in bottles at Milwaukee, sealed and labeled, a,nd for convenience of shipment was placed in open frame boxes with twenty-four separate compartments. The whiskey was in bottles, sealed and labeled, which bottles were, for convenience of shipment, packed in barrels. The defendant removed the bottles from the boxes and barrels, and sold them as they were sealed and labeled, and purchasers were not permitted to open the bottles and use the liquor upon the premises. As we understand it this was strictly an original package establishment, and was authorized by the decision of the supreme court of the United States in *Leisy*v. *Hardin,*135 U. S. 100; 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 681. That the separate bottles were original packages — that is, in the form in which they were put up by the shipper for sale — we think there can be no doubt. At least such has been the holding of this court. *Collins v. Hills, 77*Iowa, 181; *In re Beine,*42 Fed. Rep. 545.

It is proper to observe that the case at bar was heard and determined in the court below before the recent act of congress relating to the laws of the several states pertaining to the regulation or prohibition of the traffic in intoxicating liquors.

The decree of the district court will be reversed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Osario, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 700]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Mario J. Rossetti, A.J.), rendered November 2, 2001. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32




Section 1350 Certifications





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Shearson American REIT, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:





To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 22, 2013

/s/ John WilliamsJOHN WILLIAMS

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER(Principal Executive Officer)





Dated:  August 22, 2013

/s/ John WilliamsJOHN WILLIAMS

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 16







[ex16002.gif]Avalon Development Corp.

P.O. Box 80268

Fairbanks, Alaska 99708

Phone: 907-457-5159

Fax: 907-455-8069

Email: avalon@alaska.net

Web site: www.avalonalaska.com





CONSENT OF AUTHOR



To:

BC Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission





I, Curtis Freeman, do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory authorities referred to above, of the technical report dated February 10, 2006 and titled EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE GOLDEN SUMMIT PROJECT, FAIRBANKS MINING DISTRICT, ALASKA and to the written disclosure of the Technical Report and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the written disclosure in the AIF of Freegold Ventures Limited to be filed.



I also certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical Report or that the written disclosure in the AIF of Freegold Ventures Limited contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in the Technical Report.



Dated this 10th day of February 2006



|Signature of Qualified Person
      [ex16004.jpg]
      Curtis J. Freeman, CPG #6901 | [ex16003.jpg]
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------