alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
      September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) of Cardio Vascular Medical Device Corp. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, we, Benny Gaber, the President and Director of the Registrant, and
      Lavi
      Krasner, the Treasurer, Secretary and Director of the Registrant, hereby
      certify, to the best of each of our knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: November
      8, 2007





CARDIO
                VASCULAR MEDICAL DEVICE CORP.By:
            /s/
                Benny GaberName:
            Benny
                GaberTitle:
            President
                and Director(Principal
                Executive Officer)By:
            /s/
                Lavi KrasneyName:
            Lavi
                KrasneyTitle:
            Treasurer,
                Secretary, and Director
              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of SUNBURST ACQUISITIONS V, INC.
(the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2004, (the "Report"), I, Jay
Lutsky, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the Company's financial position and results of
operations.


July 28, 2005

	/s/ Jay Lutsky
	Chief Executive Officer and
	Chief Financial and
	Accounting Officer
IB

House Calendar No. 48

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 460

[Report No. 106–114]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1999

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

APRIL 27, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 401

South Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the

‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT K. RODIBAUGH

4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTHOUSE.

5 The United States courthouse located at 401 South

6 Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, shall be known
2

•S 460 RH

1 and designated as the ‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United

2 States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

6 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

7 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United

8 States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

Passed the Senate March 23, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.

House Calendar No. 48

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 460

[Report No. 106–114]

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.diana, as the ‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh Unitedat 401 South Michigan Street in South Bend, InAPRIL 27, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
# Jurnalul Oficial C 178/2016

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 178 |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 5918 mai 2016 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 178

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 5918 mai 2016

---

| Informarea nr. | Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rectificări |
| 2016/C 178/01 | Rectificare la Poziția în primă lectură (UE) nr. 1/2016 a Consiliului în vederea adoptării unui regulament al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului privind Agenția Uniunii Europene pentru Căile Ferate și de abrogare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 881/2004 — Adoptată de Consiliu la 10 decembrie 2015( JO C 56, 12.2.2016 ) | 1 |

Informarea nr.

Cuprins

Pagina

Rectificări

2016/C 178/01

Rectificare la Poziția în primă lectură (UE) nr. 1/2016 a Consiliului în vederea adoptării unui regulament al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului privind Agenția Uniunii Europene pentru Căile Ferate și de abrogare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 881/2004 — Adoptată de Consiliu la 10 decembrie 2015( JO C 56, 12.2.2016 )

( JO C 56, 12.2.2016 )

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

Rectificări

| 18.5.2016 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | C 178/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2016

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

C 178/1

---

Rectificare la Poziția în primă lectură (UE) nr. 1/2016 a Consiliului în vederea adoptării unui regulament al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului privind Agenția Uniunii Europene pentru Căile Ferate și de abrogare a Regulamentului (CE) nr. 881/2004 — Adoptată de Consiliu la 10 decembrie 2015

(
  Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene C 56 din 12 februarie 2016
  )

(2016/C 178/01)

La pagina 39, articolul 65 alineatul (10):

în loc de:

„(10)   Până la data de 30 aprilie a exercițiului N + 2, Parlamentul European, la recomandarea Consiliului care hotărăște cu majoritate calificată, acordă descărcarea directorului executiv cu privire la punerea în aplicare a bugetului pentru exercițiul N.”,

se citește:

„(10)   Până la data de 15 mai a exercițiului N + 2, Parlamentul European, la recomandarea Consiliului care hotărăște cu majoritate calificată, acordă descărcarea directorului executiv cu privire la punerea în aplicare a bugetului pentru exercițiul N.”

---
Exhibit 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, James E. Lesch, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Lesch     
|                       |  |     |  | James E. Lesch         
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



16
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 404 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 404

To prohibit the return of veterans memorial objects to foreign nations 
                 without specific authorization in law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 1999

   Mr. Thomas (for himself, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Helms, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. 
Coverdell, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, 
 Mr. Roberts, Mr. Nickles, and Mr. Sessions) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the return of veterans memorial objects to foreign nations 
                 without specific authorization in law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON THE RETURN OF VETERANS MEMORIAL OBJECTS TO 
              FOREIGN NATIONS WITHOUT SPECIFIC AUTHORIZATION IN LAW.

    (a) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding section 2572 of title 10, United 
States Code, or any other provision of law, the President may not 
transfer a veterans memorial object to a foreign country or entity 
controlled by a foreign government, or otherwise transfer or convey 
such object to a person or entity for purposes of the ultimate transfer 
or conveyance of such object to a foreign country or entity controlled 
by a foreign government, unless specifically authorized by law.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Entity controlled by a foreign government.--The term 
        ``entity controlled by a foreign government'' has the meaning 
        given that term in section 2536(c)(1) of title 10, United 
        States Code.
            (2) Veterans memorial object.--The term ``veterans memorial 
        object'' means any object, including a physical structure or 
        portion thereof, that--
                    (A) is located at a cemetery of the National 
                Cemetery System, war memorial, or military installation 
                in the United States;
                    (B) is dedicated to, or otherwise memorializes, the 
                death in combat or combat-related duties of members of 
                the United States Armed Forces; and
                    (C) was brought to the United States from abroad as 
                a memorial of combat abroad.
                                 <all>
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3141

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

under the Medicare Program of annual screening pap smear and screening pelvic exams.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage under the Medicare Program of annual

screening pap smear and screening pelvic exams.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Annual Pap

5 Tests to Save Women’s Lives Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF ANNUAL SCREENING PAP SMEAR

7 AND PELVIC EXAMS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—
2

•S 3141 IS

1 (1) ANNUAL SCREENING PAP SMEAR.—Section

2 1861(nn)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

3 1395x(nn)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘if the indi4 vidual involved has not had such a test during the

5 preceding 3 years, or during the preceding year in

6 the case of a woman described in paragraph (3).’’

7 and inserting ‘‘if the woman involved has not had

8 such a test during the preceding year.’’.

9 (2) ANNUAL SCREENING PELVIC EXAM.—Sec10 tion 1861(nn)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

11 1395x(nn)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘during the

12 preceding 3 years, or during the preceding year in

13 the case of a woman described in paragraph (3),’’

14 and inserting ‘‘during the preceding year,’’.

15 (3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

16 1861(nn) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(nn)) is

17 amended by striking paragraph (3).

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

19 subsection (a) apply to items and services furnished on

20 or after January 1, 2001.

Æ
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 503

Designating certain land in the San Isabel National Forest in the State

of Colorado as the ‘‘Spanish Peaks Wilderness’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. ALLARD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

Designating certain land in the San Isabel National Forest

in the State of Colorado as the ‘‘Spanish Peaks Wilderness’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spanish Peaks Wilder5 ness Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SPANISH PEAKS WILDERNESS.

7 (a) COLORADO WILDERNESS ACT.—Section 2(a) of

8 the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (Public Law 103–

9 77; 107 Stat. 756; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note) is amended by

10 adding at the end the following:
2

•S 503 IS

1 ‘‘(20) SPANISH PEAKS WILDERNESS.—Certain

2 land in the San Isabel National Forest that—

3 ‘‘(A) comprises approximately 18,000

4 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled

5 ‘Proposed Spanish Peaks Wilderness’, dated

6 February 10, 1999; and

7 ‘‘(B) shall be known as the ‘Spanish Peaks

8 Wilderness’.’’.

9 (b) MAP; BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION.—

10 (1) FILING.—As soon as practicable after the

11 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agri12 culture (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’),

13 shall file a map and boundary description of the

14 area designated under subsection (a) with—

15 (A) the Committee on Resources of the

16 House of Representatives; and

17 (B) the Committee on Energy and Natural

18 Resources of the Senate.

19 (2) FORCE AND EFFECT.—The map and bound20 ary description under paragraph (1) shall have the

21 same force and effect as if included in the Colorado

22 Wilderness act of 1993 (Public Law 103–77; 107

23 Stat. 756), except that the Secretary may correct

24 clerical and typographical errors in the map and

25 boundary description.
3

•S 503 IS

1 (3) AVAILABILITY.—The map and boundary de2 scription under paragraph (1) shall be on file and

3 available for public inspection in the Office of the

4 Chief of the Forest Service.

5 SEC. 3. ACCESS.

6 Within the Spanish Peaks Wilderness designated

7 under section 2—

8 (1) the Secretary shall allow the continuation of

9 historic uses of the Bulls Eye Mine Road established

10 prior to the date of enactment of this Act, subject

11 to such terms and conditions as the Secretary may

12 provide; and

13 (2) access to any privately owned land within

14 the wilderness areas designated under section 2 shall

15 be provided in accordance with section 5 of the Wil16 derness Act (16 U.S.C. 1134 et seq.).

17 SEC. 4. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

18 Section 10 of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993

19 (Public Law 103–77; 107 Stat. 756; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note)

20 is repealed.

Æ
Exhibit 1.3  [chinaagro20f123107ex13001.jpg]   [chinaagro20f123107ex13002.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13003.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13004.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13005.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13006.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13007.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13008.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13009.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13010.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13011.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13012.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13013.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13014.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13015.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13016.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13017.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13018.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13019.jpg]     [chinaagro20f123107ex13020.jpg]
| Company      Name                                    |                                                                                                                        | Jurisdiction/Country            |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                      Hifn      Limited          |                                                                                                                        |  United      Kingdom       |
|                      Hifn      Netherlands B.V. |                                                                                                                        |  Netherlands               |
|                      Hifn      Japan K.K        |                                                                                                                        | Japan                           |
|  Hifn      International                        |                                                                                                                        |  Cayman      Islands  |
| −                                    | Hifn      (Hangzhou) Information Technologies Co., Ltd. (previously known as Saian      (Hangzhou) Microsystems, Co., Ltd.) |                            | People’s      Republic of China |
|  −                              | Hangzhou      Ansai Information Technology Co., Ltd., (contractually      controlled)                                       |                            | People’s      Republic of China |

----
OFFICEOFTHEATTORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS
AUSTIN Yaroh 21, 1939

Mr. E. f. Jennings bountyhudltor Hal-din County Kountze,Texas Dear sir: opinionHO. 0411

to abvine that your 10 loring que*tlaaoont8ln

ainea ii the Omnty

The follavflng

statutorypmvi*iooa, or rol.atlve arts therclot,

pertain to the o~peasatfan of the Oountr frchar ehrt. 3941. The oounty treasurershall rsoeive 0s~i~115510ne on the momge reeetved&!r. E. P. Jenninge,

Xaroh 21, 1939, Page 2

and paid out b? hinqseid oommlssloas to be fixed by order of the oonuiasionere ~061% 138 follows: For receiving all moneys, other than school funds, for ths county,not exceeding two and one-half per cent, and not exceeding two acd one-half per cent for payin? out the aaue; provided, that he shall receive Ii0 comisaions for reoelvlng money fran his predeoesaor nor for paying over **money to**  hle **tmeoeaaor in**  **offioe.- Qrt.**  **5943. The**  ee~Iessime **allowed to**  eny Ooenty Txeemrer &all not exoeed ho ThousandDollare (&MC) annuelly;....a The oaee of Davenportet al vs. Eaatluad Oounty, reported In 60 SW S43, the Supreme Court ooa**8txue.d** the above provIsionae to the Intentionof the Legislature

rlth refereueeto oaspeneatfouof the Cous&y Treaeurer,to give to the County Trenaurer #2,OOO.C0 per nnuum, to **be** paid out of 

### feec~whloh might be 

### rhea **by** the Commleelonere* Oourt, If euch fees 8houl.d amount to that sum. Thie oaee, we think, clearlydealgnate6 when thla oompeneatlonla earned or payebleby at&Ins that %eme should be treatedaa if the CountyTreeeurer were on a ealaryOS ~2,OOO.OCa year, and be given hI8 proportionate

part of saoh ealary for the length of time he we8 engaged In serving the county,provided the feea aoorulngduring the tiae ehould be qqtml **to** that proportlonof thw whole ealkry.

It appeare from the Davenportoaee, supra,that the oompeneetlon

of the County Treasurerae fixed by etetute 1s baaed upon the length of tlme served,regardless of when oommlselonlr are earned. We are unable to find **any statutory**  authority fox the CommIesIonere* Court to advanoeAalary or make a l.oen of pub110 funds. In faot, Seotlon32 of Artlele 3 of the Constitutionof Texas prohlqlts the oounty from lending lte orealt. or 

### rtttiam.
It Is, therefore, the opinion of this **Depati-** ?ent that under the statutoryprovision6allowingtheEr. d, F. Jennings, Maroh 21. 1939, Page 3

County Treasurer ~ommlsslona, limitin< same not to exoeed $2,000.00 annually, the Sommiasloners' Court is unauthorized to ncivance or allow compensation un**earned** baaed proportionately as one, two or three months bears to the annual maximum eompensatlon. Very truly yours

**WmK:AW**

**OF** TEXAS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1569

TERRI TIMMONS EVERMAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration , Defendant

- Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 2:17

- cv - 03348

- JMC )

Submitted : April 28, 2020 Decided: May 7, 2020

Before GREGORY , Chief Judge, MOTZ , and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robertson H. Wendt, Jr. , FINKEL LAW FIRM, LLC , North Charleston, South Carolina; Sarah H. Bohr, BOHR & HARRINGTON, LLC , Atlantic Beach, Florida, for Appellant. Eric Kressman, Regional Chief Counsel, Charles Kawas, Supervisory Attorney, Evelyn Rose Marie Protano, Special Assistant United States Attorney , SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ; Sherri A. Lydon, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Terri Timmons Everman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate jud ge and upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Everman’s application for disability insurance benefits. “In social security proceedings, a court of appeals applies the same standard of review as does the district court. That is, a review ing court must uphold the determination when an ALJ has applied correct legal standards and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.” Brown v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin. , 873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017) (citation and internal quota tion marks omitted). “Substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. It consists of more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be less than a preponderance.” Pearson v. Colvin , 810 F.3d 204, 20 7 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “In reviewing for substantial evidence, we do not undertake to reweigh conflicting evidence, make credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ. Where conflic ting evidence allows reasonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is disabled, the responsibility for that decision falls on the ALJ.” Hancock v. Astrue , 667 F.3d 470, 472 (4th Cir. 2012) (brackets, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted). We have reviewed the record and perceive no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment upholding the denial of benefits. Everman v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin. , No. 2:17

- cv - 3348

- JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 2 6 , 2019). We dispense with oral3 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 17.1


                             RESIGNATION OF DIRECTOR

Received by email.

FROM:         Francois Van Der Hoeven
DATE:         Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:47 PM
TO:           Board of Directors of FoneFriend, Inc.
SUBJECT:      Resignation


Dear Board Members:

Since my  departure  16th  Feb.  03, I have not  been  involved  with the  daily
business  of  FoneFriend,  Inc.,  neither  as a board  member  nor as an interim
executive.  As you know I did not have an  employment  agreement and since I had
now interaction  with the daily business of FoneFriend,  Inc. since February 03,
this date (16th Feb. 03) will serve as my resignation from FoneFriend as a board
member and as Treasurer.  This email will serve as a formal written resignation,
a certified letter will follow.

Best Regards,

Franz Van Der Hoeven