alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Collection Activity

Number 

of 

Parties

Number of 

Responses 

per Party

Total Number 

of Responses

Time per 

Response

Cost per 

Response 

(Dollars)

Total 

Hours

Total Cost 

(Dollars)

80.1467

Application to be a foreign RIN owner 5 1 5 1 71 5 355

(m) additional attest engagement requirements 

(at $142/hour) 5 1 5 8 1136 40 5680

TOTAL 10 10 45 6035

Information Collection Burden by Type of Party

Table VI - Additional Items of Reporting for Foreign RIN Owners
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

                        Wednesday, October 16, 2024—10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. (See                         **MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED**                        ).                    

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held remotely, and in person at 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland, 20814.

# STATUS: 

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

*Decisional Matter:*                         Draft Final Rule: Safety Standard for Infant Support Cushions.                    

*Briefing Matter:*                         Fiscal Year 2025 Operating Plan.                    

*To attend the meeting remotely, please use the following link:**https://cpsc.webex.com/​cpsc/​j.php?​MTID=​m569336dacbad291c7ee5cea24627e107.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Alberta E. Mills, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (Cell).

Dated: October 9, 2024.

Alberta E. Mills,

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-23810 Filed 10-10-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BOSCO FLOORING,INC.(the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: February 13, 2008


/s/ Alexander Dannikov
----------------------------------------
Alexander Dannikov, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with this Quarter Report of CHINA NORTHERN MEDICAL DEVICE, INC.  (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jinzhao Wu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.Such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CHINA NORTHERN MEDICAL DEVICE, INC.  Date:   November 15, 2010/s/Jinzhao WuJinzhao Wu
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Shaun D. Langford, President (Principal Executive Officer) and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of Elray Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



/s/ Shaun D. Langford

Shaun D. Langford 
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

November 13, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$75,000.00                                                Minneapolis, Minnesota
                                                                October 10, 2001


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Active IQ Technologies, Inc., a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Maker"), hereby
unconditionally promises to pay to _______________, or his successors and
assigns (the "Payee"), at Minneapolis, Minnesota or at such other place or
places as may be designated by the Payee from time to time, the principal sum of
Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00) (the "Principal Sum"). The Principal
Sum shall be due and payable on April 10, 2002.

     All payments on account of this Note, when paid, shall be applied first to
the payment of all interest then due on the unpaid Principal Sum and the
balance, if any, shall be applied to reduction of the unpaid balance of the
Principal Sum. This Note may be prepaid in full or in part at any time without
premium.

     Maker waives presentment, protest and demand, notice of protest, notice of
dishonor and non-payment of this Note, and expressly agrees that this Note, or
any payment hereunder, may be extended from time to time without in any way
affecting the liability of the Maker.

     This Note is the "Purchaser's Note" within the meaning of that certain
Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 10, 2001 (the "Purchase Agreement"), by
and among Active IQ Technologies, Inc. and the former shareholders (the
"Shareholders") of FMS Marketing, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Company").
The satisfaction of this Note is secured under the terms of a "Security
Agreement" (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) of even date herewith,
including any event of default specified therein.

     Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, Maker shall have
no obligation under this Note unless and until the Shareholders have obtained
from Farm Management, Inc. a release from that certain license agreement dated
October 31, 1990, as more fully described in Section 5.9 of the Purchase
Agreement.

     The terms, conditions and provisions of this Note shall be construed and
enforced according to the laws of the State of Minnesota.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officer of Maker has caused this
Note to be executed on the date first written above.


                           ACTIVE IQ TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation



                           By:
                              ----------------------------------------
                                 Kenneth W. Brimmer
                                 Its: Chief Executive Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2799

To allow a deduction for Federal, State, and local taxes on gasoline, diesel

fuel, or other motor fuel purchased by consumers between July 1, 2000,

and December 31, 2000.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 27, 2000

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself, Mr. ABRAHAM, anf Mr. CAMPBELL) introduced

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on Finance

A BILL

To allow a deduction for Federal, State, and local taxes

on gasoline, diesel fuel, or other motor fuel purchased

by consumers between July 1, 2000, and December 31,

2000.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Fuel Tax

5 Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCOME TAX DEDUCTION FOR FED7 ERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL FUELS TAXES.

8 (a) ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION.—
2

•S 2799 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of the retail sale

2 of gasoline, diesel fuel, or other motor fuel after

3 June 30, 2000, and before January 1, 2001, there

4 shall be allowed to the purchaser a deduction under

5 section 164 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

6 in an amount equal to the Federal, State, and local

7 taxes on the sale.

8 (2) DEDUCTION ALLOWED TO NON9 ITEMIZERS.—The deduction under subsection (a)

10 shall be taken into account in computing adjusted

11 gross income under section 62 of such Code.

12 (b) TAXES IMPOSED OTHER THAN AT RETAIL.—For

13 purposes of subsection (a), any tax on any gasoline, diesel

14 fuel, or other motor fuel which is imposed other than on

15 the retail sale shall be treated as having been imposed on

16 such sale and as having been paid by the purchaser.

17 (c) GUIDELINES.—The Secretary of the Treasury

18 shall establish such procedures (including the publication

19 of tables where appropriate) as are necessary to enable

20 taxpayers to determine the amount of taxes for which a

21 deduction is allowed under subsection (a).

22 (d) MOTOR FUEL.—For purposes of this section, the

23 term ‘‘motor fuel’’ means any motor fuel subject to tax

24 under subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   I, Marvin Woods, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AI Document Services, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: August 19, 2015   /s/Marvin Woods Marvin Woods Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Elizabeth A. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
       Company.

/s/ Elizabeth A. Murphy

Elizabeth A. Murphy
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2003

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and will be retained by
Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 In connection with the Annual Report of Mediacom Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), Rocco B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 March 30,

 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanChief Financial Officer
 89
#### Estate of Radomski: Radomski and another, Proponents, Appellants, vs. Radomski and others, Contestants, Respondents.

For the appellants : *Hale & Skemp*and *Gordon, Law, Brody & Johns,*all of La Crosse.

For the respondents: *C. E. Fugina*and *La Vern G. Kostner,*both of Arcadia.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### State ex rel. Martin, Attorney General, Appellant, vs. Nickolai and another, Respondents.

*March 14*—

April *29, 1946.*

For the appellant there were briefs by the *Attorney General, James Ward Rector,*deputy attorney general, *W. E. Torkel-son,*assistant attorney general, and *J. Norman Basten,*district attorney of Brown county, and oral argument by *Mr. Rector.*

*G. F. Clifford*of Green Bay, for the respondents.

A brief was filed by *Paul E. Jorgensen*of Racine, attorney for the Tavern League of Wisconsin, Inc., as *amicus curies.*

A brief was also filed by *Clarence Simon,*district attorney of Taylor county, as *amicus curies.*

Barl'ow, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *State ex rel. Martin v. Barrett, ante,*p. 621, 22 N. W. (2d) 663, decided herewith, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to enter judgment enjoining defendants from selling, dealing, or trafficking in intoxicating liquor, as demanded in the complaint.

Rector, J., took no part.
U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor, Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE. 

## Z!Hi Washington, DC 20590

Re Docket Number FAA-2011-0422
Dear Madam or Sir, 

## I: t: 

## L Wednesday, November28, 2012

I am requesting an extension of my exemption from needing to maintain two Alcohol and Drug Prevention Programs. I operate a small FAR 135 (IHVA646K) "On Demand" charter and 91.147 (DSFJS005) "Tour" LOA. I operatetwo aircraft, one helicopter N660KD and one Airplane N700KD. I am the single pilot (and only).
This situation gives me a possibility ofbeing randomly selected fortesting for both operations atthe same time. Itas well morethan doublesthe expenses to the companyto maintain both programs. In that we are a small operation, this amountsto a financial hardship for me. I have direct oversight ofthe Alcohol and Drug Prevention Programs and can morethan adequately manage all personnel (1) under on program. I believe this will meetthe intended goals ofthe Alcohol and Drug prevention and monitoringforthe Federal Aviation Administration.
I am therefore requesting that an exemption be extended, allowing meto have myself in one Alcohol and Drug Prevention Program. MyContact info is: Dale Schneider Schneider Flight Services DBA ARC Aviation 5836 Fayetteville Road Suite 204 Durham, NC 27713-6692 dale@SchneiderFiightServices.com 919.544.9890 office 919.730.5000 cell
FAR 135 (IHVA646K) "On Demand" charter and 91.147 (DSFJS005) "Tour" LOA

# ?,;z~~ Dale Schneider Director ofCps, Chief Pilot and DER Schneider Flight Services DBA ARC Aviation
#### R. S. Husted v. Kate Douglas Williams, et al., Appellants.

Continuance to take depositions. Under Code, section 3653, a party-may elect to take his evidence by deposition, and he is entitled to a reasonable time in which to do so; and after issue joined, there being no order to take the evidence during the term, nor a showing of sufficient time had such order been entered, he is entitled to a continuance.

*635
      *Appeal from Madison District*Court.— HoN. Jas. H. Gamble, Judge.

Tuesday, February 14, 1905.

IN an action to quiet title, commenced by published notice, plaintiff secured judgment against defendants by default. Thereafter defendants moved to set aside the default, and, being allowed to make defense, a decree was entered for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.—

*Reversed.*

*Steele & Robbins,*for appellants.

*John A. Gwiher,*for appellee.

McOlaiN, J.—

The petition was filed in February, 1901, and in May of the same year a decree on default was rendered in' plaintiff’s favor. In July, 1902, defendants filed their motion for retrial, which was amended in September, 1903. On September 30, 1903, the defendants filed their answer to the original petition, and had entered of record their election to take testimony in the form of depositions, and thereupon moved for a continuance for that purpose. This motion was overruled, and the ruling is urged as error.

Defendants had the right, under Code, section 3652, to elect to take their evidence by depositions, and they were entitled to a reasonable time in which to do so. As depositions could not be taken during the pendency of the term of court (Code, section 4688), except by order of court, a continuance should have been granted, under Code, section 3663, for this purpose. Until issue was joined, defendants could not be required to prepare for the taking of depositions, and they were therefore not negligent in not sooner procuring their evidence, although a considerable time had elapsed after the filing of the motion to set aside default. Perhaps the de*636fendants might have bad an order of court to take depositions pending the term, but there is nothing in the record to indicate that such permission, if secured, would have enabled them to take their depositions in time for trial of the case during the term.

The action of the trial court in refusing to grant a continuance was error, and the decree in favor of plaintiff is therefore *reversed.*