alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

---

# Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of B.V.R. Systems (1998) Ltd (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Reuven Shahar, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 30, 2008

| |  | /s/ Reuven Shahar
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of BSN Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report'), I, Gerald Bush, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  November 13, 2008    /s/ Gerald Bush ------------------------------------ Gerald Bush Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT A

                        LAWRENCE B. SEIDMAN, INDIVIDUALLY
                                 100 Misty Lane
                          Parsippany, New Jersey 07054
Principal occupation: Attorney and Consultant.
President, General Counsel and Director of Menlo Acquisition Corporation
Investment Employment principally conducted through Seidman & Associates, L.L.C.
(Manager), Seidman Investment Partnership, L.P.and Seidman Investment
Partnership II, LP (President of Corporate General Partner), Kerrimatt, LP
(Investment Manager), Pollack Investment Partnership, L.P. (Co-General Partner)
and Federal  Holdings, LLC (Investment Manager)and Lawrence B. Seidman, Esq.

                                 KEVIN S. MOORE
                              Clark Estates, Inc.
                             One Rockefeller Plaza
                               New York, NY 10020
Principal Occupation: Senior Vice President
Employment conducted through: Clark Estates,Inc.

                                ANGELA CALI KLOBY
                                11 Commerce Drive
                           Cranford, New Jersey 07016
Principal Occupation: Unemployed
Member of Seidcal & Associates, LLC
Seidcal & Associates, LLC is a Member of SAL

                                   BRANT CALI
                                11 Commerce Drive
                           Cranford, New Jersey 07016
Principal Occupation: Private Real Estate Investor and Businessman
Member of Seidcal & Associates, LLC
Seidcal & Associates, LLC is a Member of SAL

                                CHRISTOPHER CALI
                                11 Commerce Drive
                           Cranford, New Jersey 07016
Principal Occupation: Part-Time Musician
Member of Seidcal & Associates, LLC
Seidcal & Associates, LLC is a Member of SAL

                                  JOHN R. CALI
                                11 Commerce Drive
                           Cranford, New Jersey 07016
Principal Occupation:Private Real Estate Investor and Businessman
Member of Seidcal & Associates, LLC
Seidcal & Associates, LLC is a Member of SAL

                                   JONNA CALI
                                11 Commerce Drive
                           Cranford, New Jersey 07016
Principal Occupation: Unemployed
Member of Seidcal & Associates, LLC
Seidcal & Associates, LLC is a Member of SAL

                                    ROSE CALI
                                11 Commerce Drive
                           Cranford, New Jersey 07016
Principal Occupation: Unemployed
Member of Seidcal & Associates, LLC
Seidcal & Associates, LLC is a Member of SAL


                                 DENNIS POLLACK
                                47 Blueberry Drive
                           Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
Principal Occupation: Businessman and private investor
President of MCB Mortgage Company, a division of Mohawk Community Bank and
President and CEO of Pegasus Funding Group, LLC
Co-General Partner of Pollack Investment Partnership, L.P.
Director of Menlo Acquisition Corp.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. HOM AR RENOVA-C ASTILLO, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-30018

D.C . No. 1:13-c r-00046-SPW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na Susa n P. W atte rs, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2014 ** B e fore : W ALLAC E, LEAVY, a nd B YB EE, C i rc uit Judge s . Hom ar R e nova -C a stillo a ppe a ls from the distric t

c o urt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s the 135-m onth se nte nc e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for c o nspira c y

to posse ss m e tha

m phe tam ine with intent to distribute , in viola tion of 21 U.S.C . § 846. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED D EC 17 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).R e nova -C a stillo c onte nds tha t the distric t

c o urt e rre d whe n it de te rm ine d the qua ntity of m e tha m p he tam ine for purpose s of e sta blishing his ba se offe nse le ve l unde r the Se nte nc ing Guide line s. He argue s tha t the c ourt should ha

ve c a lc ulate d a le sse r am ount be c a

use he posse sse d som e of the m e t ham phe tam ine for pe rsona l use and not with the

inte nt to distribute . W e re vie w the distric t c ourt’ s fa c tua l findings a t se nte n c ing for c le ar e rror. Se e Unite d State s v . Asagba , 77 F.3d 324, 325 (9th C i r. 1996). The re c ord re fle c ts tha t the distric t c ourt did not c le a rly e rr in finding tha

t R e nova -C a stillo c onspire d to posse ss with the inte nt to distribute

at le a st 1.8 kilogra

m s of m e tha

m phe t am ine . AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 3 0 0 1 8 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Security Bank Corporation (the Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the Report), Tony E. Collins, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. McLemore, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2008                                      
|                                                             
|/s/ Tony E. Collins                                          
|Tony E. Collins Interim President and Chief Executive
Officer



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2008                                                    
|                                                                           
|/s/ James R. McLemore, Jr.                                                 
|James R. McLemore, Jr. Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Gloria Rose, Appellant, v Horton Medical Center, Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 114]

*460In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), entered October 3, 2002, which, upon an order of the same court dated August 14, 2002, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, is in favor of the defendant and against her.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the order dated August 14, 2002, is vacated, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

Initially, we note that the plaintiff previously appealed from the order dated August 14, 2002, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. That appeal was dismissed by this Court for failure to prosecute. Although the plaintiff ordinarily would be precluded from relitigating the issues which could have been raised on the prior appeal *(see Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.,*93 NY2d 750 [1999]; *Bray v Cox,*38 NY2d 350 [1976]), since the instant appeal was perfected before the prior appeal was dismissed, and under all of the circumstances of this case, we exercise our discretion to entertain the instant appeal *(see Faricelli v TSS Seedman’s,*94 NY2d 772 [1999]).

It is well settled that “the proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact” *(Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *see also Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]). If such a showing has been made, the burden then shifts to the opponent to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., supra).*

The defendant, Horton Medical Center (hereinafter the Hospital), established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the plaintiffs decedent was treated only by private attending physicians who were not employees of the Hospital, and thus it could not be held vicariously liable for any alleged malpractice *(see Woodard v LaGuardia Hosp.,*282 AD2d 529 [2001]). However, in opposition thereto, the plaintiff raised a material issue of fact in this regard by submitting proof that a doctor, who may have been a Hospital employee, examined and prescribed a course of treatment for *461the decedent on the day before he died. Under such circumstances, the Hospital was not entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint *(see Malcolm v Mount Vernon Hosp.,*309 AD2d 704 [2003]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Schmidt and Mastro, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         211,461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    474,963
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,239,152
<PP&E>                                         210,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                  95,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,599,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,026,372
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           152
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,573,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,599,931
<SALES>                                      1,695,231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,695,231
<CGS>                                        1,012,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,554,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,911,368)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,934,821)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,911,368)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 20-20612

Michael Geoffrey Peters,

Plaintiff—Appellant ,

versus

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice; Rabbi Dovid Goldstein; The Aleph Institute; Rabbi Shimon Lararoff; The Chabad Outreach; The State of Texas,

Defendants—Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CV-3581

Before Smith, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: *
Michael Peters, Texas prisoner # 2019190, moves to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal as a sanction ed litigant following the district court’s dismissal without prejudice, per 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), of his 42 U.S.C.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 9, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-20612 Document: 00516196200 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/09/2022No. 20-20612

2 § 1983 action. Peters’s speculative and conclusory arguments are insufficient to make the showing required to av oid application of the three-strikes bar under § 1915(g). See Banos v. O’Guin , 144 F.3d 883, 884–85 (5th Cir. 1998); Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982).
Peters’s motion to supplement the record is GRANTED . His motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED . For the same reasons, his appeal of the dism issal is frivolous and is DISMISSED

. See 5th
Cir. R. 42.2; Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997).

Peters is WARNED that frivolous, repetitive, or otherwise abusive filings will invite the imposition of ot her sanctions, which may include dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictio ns on his ability to file pleadings in this court and any court subjec t to this court’s jurisdiction

. See Coghlan v. Starkey , 852 F.2d 806, 817 n.21 (5th Cir. 1988) (per curiam). Case: 20-20612 Document: 00516196200 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/09/2022
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00454-CR

Thomas George Craaybeek

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 90th District Court

of Young County (10573)

August 26, 2016

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Sue Walker___________________

 Justice Sue Walker
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3268

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to improve provisions concerning

the recovery of damages for injuries resulting from oil spills.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. SMITH of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to improve provisions concerning the recovery of damages for injuries

resulting from oil spills.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fishery and Aqua5 culture Oil Spill Assistance Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. INTEREST; PARTIAL PAYMENT OF CLAIMS.

7 Section 1005 of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33

8 U.S.C. 2705) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing:

10 ‘‘(c) LOAN PROGRAM.—
2

•S 3268 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall estab2 lish a loan program to assist injured parties in meet3 ing financial obligations during the claims procedure

4 described in section 1013.

5 ‘‘(2) CONDITION FOR LOAN.—A loan may be

6 awarded under paragraph (1) only to a fisherman or

7 aquaculture producer to whom a responsible party

8 has failed to provide an interim payment under sub9 section (a).’’.

10 SEC. 3. USES OF THE FUND.

11 Section 1012(a) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33

12 U.S.C. 2712(a)) is amended—

13 (1) in paragraph (5)(C), by striking the period

14 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

15 (2) by adding at the end the following:

16 ‘‘(6) the making of loans to assist any injured

17 party in paying financial obligations during the

18 claims procedure described in section 1013.’’.

19 SEC. 4. STUDY.

20 Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment

21 of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation

22 with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection

23 Agency, shall submit to Congress a study that contains—

24 (1) an assessment of the effectiveness of the

25 claims procedures and emergency response programs
3

•S 3268 IS

1 under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C.

2 2701 et seq.) concerning claims filed by, and emer3 gency responses carried out to protect the interests

4 of, fishermen and aquaculture producers; and

5 (2) any legislative or other recommendations to

6 improve the procedures and programs referred to in

7 paragraph (1).

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 453 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 453

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 709 West 9th Street in 
     Juneau, Alaska, as the ``Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HURFF A. SAUNDERS FEDERAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building located at 709 West 9th Street in Juneau, 
Alaska, shall be known and designated as the ``Hurff A. Saunders 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Hurff A. Saunders 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the Senate March 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 453

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the Federal building located at 709 West 9th Street in 
     Juneau, Alaska, as the ``Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building''.
```
<pre>

EXHIBIT 10.14 2001 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF RODNEY W. LIGHTHIPE

AMENDED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective the 1st
day of March 2001, by and between Conectisys, Inc., a Colorado corporation
("ConectiSys"), ("Employer"), and Rodney W. Lighthipe  ("Employee").

The following amendments to the language of the terms noted are hereby amended
as follows:

The amendments are effective March 1, 2001:

1.Employment and term. Employer hereby employs Employee and Employee hereby
accepts employment from Employer to perform the duties set forth below, for a
term of six (6) months ending September 30, 2001.

2.All other terms and conditions remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed as of the day and year first above written.


Employee:___________________________________
         Rodney W. Lighthipe



Employer:___________________________________
         Robert A. Spigno
         CEO
         Conectisys Corp.