alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of the filing of a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to remove International Return Receipt from the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification Schedule and to make accompanying classification changes.

# DATES:

*Applicable date:*                         January 1, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher C. Meyerson, 202-268-7820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 3642 and 39 CFR § 3040.130                     *et seq.,*                     as well as 39 U.S.C. § 3632 and 39 CFR § 3040.180                     *et seq.,*                     on October 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Remove International Return Receipt from the Competitive Product List and to Make Accompanying Classification Changes*                     in the Mail Classification Schedule.                           ( print page 83919)                        Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket No. MC2025-58.                

Christopher Doyle,

Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2024-24036 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### State ex rel. Martin, Attorney General, Appellant, vs. Gussert and another, Respondents.

*March 14*—

April *29, 1946.*

For the appellant there were briefs by the *Attorney General, James Ward Rector,*deputy attorney general, *W. E. Torkel-son,*assistant attorney general, and /. *Norman Basten,*district attorney of Brown county, and oral argument by *Mr. Rector.*

*Meyer M. Cohen*of Green Bay, for the respondents.

A brief was filed by *Paul E. Jorgensen*of Racine, attorney for the Tavern League of Wisconsin, Inc., as *amicus curies.*

A brief was also filed by *Clarence Simón,*district attorney of Taylor county, as *amicus curice.*

Barlow, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *State ex rel. Martin v. Barrett, ante,*p. 621, 22 N. W. (2d) 663, decided herewith, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause ’remanded with instructions to enter judgment enjoining defendants from selling, dealing, or trafficking in intoxicating liquor, as demanded in the complaint.

Rector, J., took no part.
(LOGO)
KPMG
1600 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-7212

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.:

We have examined  management's  assertion  about GE Capital  Mortgage  Services,
Inc.'s (the Company's) compliance with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for  Mortgage  Bankers  for  primary  serviced  loans  (including  those
serviced by the Company  pursuant to various  pooling and  servicing  agreements
relating to the Company's publicly rated mortgage-backed  securities program) as
of and for the year  ended  December  31,  1998,  included  in the  accompanying
management  assertion.  Management is responsible  for the Company's  compliance
with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to express an
opinion on management's  assertion about the Company's  compliance  based on our
examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the Company has  complied in all
material  respects  with the  aforementioned  minimum  servicing  standards  for
primary serviced loans as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

February, 8, 1999


(LOGO)
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24047]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 446 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-39, K2025-38.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24047 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Craig Armstrong, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated: March 5, 2014

/s/ J. Craig
ArmstrongJ. Craig ArmstrongPresident and Chief Executive Officer

---
### SERVED: APRIL 23, 2012 ')1'1 'i lt_ 1L

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF FLYING HIGH, LLC FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Case) DMS FAA-2011-1292
ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

### 2 3 p. 2: 32

On December 9, 2011, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a Complaint. On December 6, 2011, Flying High, LLC ("Respondent") had filed a Requestfor Hearing. Complainant, onApril20, 2012, has withdrawn its Complaint and moved for termination ofthe proceedings under 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, citing settlement. 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215 states: "Atany time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint orparty may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart withprejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal ofComplaint and Motionhaving beenread and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Complainant's Withdrawal ofComplaint and Motionto Terminate Proceeding be and is hereby granted; and2 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### · Sean Benjamin Cooke, Manager

Flying High, LLC, 

### Respondent 3309 E. Milky Way Gilbert, AZ 85295 TEL: 480-252-0021
. FAJ(:**877-849~0021** 

### Adam Runkel, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Western-Pacific Region, A WP-7.12 Federal Aviation Administration P.0. 

### Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7142 FAJ(:**310-725~6816** 

### ONE COPY

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 ,, U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAJ(: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2011-1292 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 24

- 00054

- CV

In re Michael Glenn Roller

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We dismiss as moot relator Michae l Glenn Roller ’ s petition for writ o f

mandamus , which raises the same arguments that Roller made in his previous petition for writ of

mandamus that we denied today

.

__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana , Justice

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Kelly

Filed: March 28, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 444 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-36, K2025-35.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24045 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84946-84947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.

[[Page 84947]]

3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 398 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-104, K2025-102.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24621 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned,
Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 10, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jason K. Wadzinski 
|                       |  |     |  | Jason K. Wadzinski     
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 471

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the 60-month

limit on student loan interest deductions.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. JEFFORDS, Ms. COLLINS, Mr.

COCHRAN, and Mr. ABRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate

the 60-month limit on student loan interest deductions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF 60-MONTH LIMIT ON STUDENT

4 LOAN INTEREST DEDUCTION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 221 of the Internal Reve6 nue Code of 1986 (relating to interest on education loans)

7 is amended by striking subsection (d) and by redesignat8 ing subsections (e), (f), and (g) as subsections (d), (e),

9 and (f), respectively.
2

•S 471 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 6050(e) of

2 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking

3 ‘‘section 221(e)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 221(d)(1)’’.

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 this section shall apply with respect to any loan interest

6 paid after December 31, 1997.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Oil and Gas Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Richard G. Stifel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 8th day of July 2010.





RICHARD STIFELRichard G. StifelChief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00119-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Richard Howard, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-06-205190, HONORABLE CHARLES F. BAIRD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The State appeals the district court’s order granting appellee Richard Howard’s

motion to quash count one of the indictment in this cause accusing him of felony murder. See

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(1) (West 2006) (giving State right of appeal);

Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.02(b)(3) (defining felony murder). Count one alleges that Howard, while

in the course of committing the felony offense of driving while intoxicated, committed an act clearly

dangerous to human life by driving a motor vehicle over a curb and striking Donald Hatley,

causing Hatley’s death. The district court ruled as a matter of law that because the offense of driving

while intoxicated does not have a culpable mental state, it cannot serve as the basis for a

felony murder prosecution.

While this appeal was pending, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals announced its

decision in Lomax v. State, No. PD-0944-06, 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 870 (Tex. Crim. App.
2

June 27, 2007). In Lomax, the court held that section 19.02(b)(3) plainly dispenses with a culpable

mental state and that felony driving while intoxicated can be the underlying offense in a felony

murder prosecution. Id. at *1, *7. The court overruled in part the opinion in Rodriguez v. State,

548 S.W.2d 26, 28-29 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977), on which the district court relied in this cause. Id.

at *13-14. In his brief to this Court, Howard’s counsel concedes that the Lomax opinion is

dispositive and that the trial court’s ruling is erroneous in light of this new authority.

On the authority of Lomax, we reverse the district court’s order dismissing count one

of the indictment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Reversed and Remanded

Filed: September 26, 2007

Do Not Publish
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0378

_____________________________
H ERMAN R OBINSON , J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Edward P. Nickinson
, III, Judge

. April 6, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , R OBERTS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9 .330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Herman Robinson, Jr., pro se
, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
April 11, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THERON OWENS, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00676-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (i) Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-75027, No. 333-96175 and No. 333-96415) of CoreComm Limited
(the "Company") and (ii) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-90113) of the
Company and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated March 3, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of the Company
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.




                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
March 29, 2000
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA- 

### 2010-0068 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2010-NE-05 -AD

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder,

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? (You might need to submit a separate

record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “ Ex Parte Contacts .”)

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE



### GE Dave Shoemaker Several Concur.



### NTSB Carol Horgan 11/4/10 No response.



### ATA Joe White 11/3/10 No response.



### EASA Marc Locquet 11/4/10 No response.

Other/Additional Information: 

### GE provided technical informa tion to carry out the actions

mandated by this AD.
#### Leipe, Appellant, vs. Boardman, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Sheldon & Freytag*of Elkhorn.

For the respondent: *Charles E. Lyon*of Elkhorn, attorney, and *Rieser & Mathys*of Madison of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO.  2-08-440-CR

ROBERT ALLAN JOY								APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant's “Motion To Withdraw Notice Of Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 

									PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, LIVINGSTON, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 25, 2010
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce Thomsen, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.    February 14, 2011  /s/ Bruce Thomsen Bruce Thomsen Principal Executive Officer Principal Accounting Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.