alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Roy Israel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of clickNsettle.com,
Inc. (the "registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's first fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  November 11, 2004


/s/ Roy Israel
------------------------------------
Roy Israel - Chairman of the Board, CEO and President


                                       25
II

Calendar No. 259

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 452

For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

AUGUST 5, 1999

Reported by Mr. HATCH, with an amendment

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for

5 purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8

6 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Belinda McGregor shall be held and

7 considered to have been selected for a diversity immigrant
2

S 452 RS

1 visa for fiscal year 1999 2000 as of the date of the enact2 ment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Belinda McGregor,

4 or any child (as defined in section 101(b)(1) of the Immi5 gration and Nationality Act) of Belinda McGregor, enters

6 the United States before the date of the enactment of this

7 Act, he or she shall be considered to have entered and

8 remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligi9 ble for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Im10 migration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enact11 ment of this Act.

12 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

13 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Belinda

14 McGregor as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State

15 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one number

16 during the current fiscal year the total number of immi17 grant visas available to natives of the country of the alien’s

18 birth under section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nation19 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(c)).

Calendar No. 259

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 452

A BILL

For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

AUGUST 5, 1999

Reported with an amendment
#### Fidelity Savings Bank, Administrator, Plaintiff, vs. Aulik and another, Defendants and Appellants: Rodowca and another, Impleaded Defendants and Respondents.

*April 13*

May *25, 1948.*

The cause was submitted for the appellants on the brief of *E. P. Gorman*of Wausau, and *Gustav Winter'oí*Antigo, and for the respondents on the brief of *O’Melia & Kaye*of Rhine-lander.

BARLOW, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *Fidelity Savings Bank v. Aulik, ante,*p. 602, 32 N. W. (2d) 613, and is ruled by the decision' therein.

*By the Court.*— judgment affirmed.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45996

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ANTHONY LEWIS RATLIFF,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: February 7, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Peter G. Barton, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Anthony Lewis Ratliff pled guilty to domestic violence in the presence of a child. Idaho 

Code §§ 18-918(2), 18-903(a), 18-918(4). The district court sentenced Ratliff to a unified term 

of ten years with five years determinate and retained jurisdiction. Subsequently, the district court 

relinquished jurisdiction. Ratliff filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court 

denied. Ratliff appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by failing to reduce 

his sentence.

Although Ratliff received the sentence he asked for, he asserts that the district court erred 

in denying his Rule 35 motion. The doctrine of invited error applies to estop a party from 

asserting an error when his or her own conduct induces the commission of the error. State v. 
2

Atkinson, 124 Idaho 816, 819, 864 P.2d 654, 657 (Ct. App. 1993). One may not complain of 

errors one has consented to or acquiesced in. State v. Caudill, 109 Idaho 222, 226, 706 P.2d 456, 

460 (1985); State v. Lee, 131 Idaho 600, 605, 961 P.2d 1203, 1208 (Ct. App. 1998). In short, 

invited errors are not reversible. State v. Gittins, 129 Idaho 54, 58, 921 P.2d 754, 758 (Ct. App. 

1996). This doctrine applies to sentencing decisions as well as rulings made during trial. State v. 

Griffith, 110 Idaho 613, 614, 716 P.2d 1385, 1386 (Ct. App. 1986). 

Therefore, because Ratliff received the sentence he requested, he may not complain that 

the district court abused its discretion. Accordingly, the district court’s order denying Ratliff’s 

Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2024-0001]


Notice of Award Amount Adjustment for Serious Needs Assistance

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice of the award amount for Serious Needs 
Assistance provided under the Individuals and Households Program for 
emergencies and major disasters declared on or after October 1, 2024.

DATES: This adjustment applies to emergencies and major disasters 
declared on or after October 1, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Matranga, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 212-1000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA regulations at 44 CFR 206.119(b)(1) 
prescribe that FEMA will annually adjust the award amount for Serious 
Needs Assistance (SNA) provided under the Individuals and Households 
Program. FEMA gives notice that the award amount for SNA provided to an 
individual or household under section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act with respect to any single 
emergency or major disaster is $770. The increase in award amount is 
for any single emergency or major disaster declared on or after October 
1, 2024.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for all Urban Consumers of 2.5 percent for the 12-month period, 
which ended in August 2024. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. 
Department of Labor released the information on September 11, 2024.

    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.048, Federal 
Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and 
Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to 
Individuals and Households--Other Needs.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24701 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00314-CR

Ricky Hernandez

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 07-6-23,223-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 26, 2018
II

Calendar No. 57

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 453

To designate the Federal building located at 709 West 9th Street in Juneau,

Alaska, as the ‘‘Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mr. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

MARCH 17, 1999

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 709 West 9th

Street in Juneau, Alaska, as the ‘‘Hurff A. Saunders

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HURFF A. SAUNDERS FED4 ERAL BUILDING.

5 The Federal building located at 709 West 9th Street

6 in Juneau, Alaska, shall be known and designated as the

7 ‘‘Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building’’.
2

S 453 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building’’.

Calendar No. 57

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 453

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 709

‘‘Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building’’.West 9th Street in Juneau, Alaska, as the

MARCH 17, 1999

Reported without amendment
EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of PCS Research Technology,
Inc. (the " Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the " Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



Dated: March 31, 2003                  By: /s/ BRIAN M. OVERSTREET
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Name:  Brian M. Overstreet
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of PCS Research Technology,
Inc. (the " Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the " Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



Dated: March 31, 2003                  By: /s/ MICHAEL H. LORBER
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Name:  Michael H. Lorber
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    I, Marinus Jellema, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Software, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: July 30, 2009  /s/ Marinus Jellema Marinus Jellema, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Pacific Software, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                              866
<SECURITIES>                                                        638
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       555
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        110
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  2,059
<PP&E>                                                              681
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    2,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               731
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                              3
<OTHER-SE>                                                        4,829
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      1,665
<SALES>                                                           1,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  1,976
<CGS>                                                               494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     2,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    (540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                (540)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       (540)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (0.16)


</TABLE>
From:    Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov

Sent:    Tuesday, May 18, 2010 1:43 PM

To:    Laney, Michael N.

Cc:    Torres.Elineth@epamail.epa.gov; Icenhour, Melissa K.; Samudra Vijay

Subject: RE: Equipment Life

Attachments: pic00138.gif

Here are the equipment lives we will use in ISIS and the RTI costing (regardless or what we did at

proposal).

Fabric Filter ‐ 20 years

Scrubber ‐ 20 years

ACI ‐ 20 years

SCR ‐ 20 years

ESP ‐ 20 years

RTO ‐ 10 years

This is consistent with the OAQPS cost manual and costing for other rules.

Also here is some cost data from the boiler costing:

(Embedded image moved to file: pic00138.gif)

I found a limestone cost of $5.00 per ton and a lime cost of $65.00 per ton in the Lehigh BACT analysis.

I think we are using five year bag life ‐ this is much higher than boilers ‐ however, as long as we have a

basis for five years I am OK with it.  If not, maybe we should be consistent with boiler costing ‐ 4 years

for the cage and 2 years for the bags.

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243‐02

Research Triangle Park, NC  27711

919‐541‐5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov
#### R. E. Cressey, Surviving Partner, v. Henry Lochner and Hanna Lochner, Appellants, and Henry Heightman.

.Affirmance: improperly prepared abstract. Under Supreme Goui’t Rule 21, providing that, when appellant fails to comply with the rule requiring only so much of the record as may be necessary to a full understanding of the question presented for decision to be included in the abstract, the court may affirm the : judgment without considering the appeal, an appeal will be affirmed where appellant presents as his abstract a record of one hundred pages, containing the reporter’s notes of the testimony, consisting of questions and answers; the court being, also, satisfied that the judgpient appealed from is correct.

*'Appeal from Olinton District Court.*— HoN. P. B. Wolee, Judge.

Saturday, October 21, 1899.

The plaintiff, a subcontractor under the defendant Heightman, who contracted with the defendant Lochner fo-r the erection of a barn, brings this action to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien for lumber furnished for the construction of said barn, and for a judgment for ninety-eight dollars and ninety-eight cents balance due therefor. The issue joined is as to whether the defendant Lochner is indebted to the defendant Heightman on account of the erection of said barn. Judgment and decree were rendered In favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant Lochner *appeals.*

Affirmed.

*T. W. Hall*for appellant.

*W. J. Rogers*for appellee.

*455GiveN, J.-

Appellant’s counsel, in ‘his brief, 'yet very thorough, argument of the single issue, says, with propriety: “I do not believe that' it is necessary to inflict upon the •court any very extended argument of this matter.” He-was not so considerate in preparing his so-called “abstract.” Therein he presents the oral testimony in about one hundred •pages, consisting throughout of questions and answers. It is not an abstract, but' a transcript of the reporter’s extended notes of the testimony. Section 4118 of the Code provides that “printed abstracts of the record shall be filed in acco-rd•ance with rules established by the supreme court.” Eule 21 is as follows: “Sec. 2-1. If it appear from an inspection •of the abstract that the appellant has negligently or intentionally failed to comply with the rule requiring only so much of the record as may be necessary to a full under.•standing of the question presented for decision to be included therein, the court may, in its discretion, order a new abstract prepared in conformity with such rule or aiflrm the judgment of the lower court without considering the appeal.” It is not an abstract such as might have been included in .a few pages, but one hundred pages of transcript of the reporter’s notes, that is presented for our consideration. This i.s such a disregard of the rule that we feel called upon to say that because of it the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed. See *Philips v.*Crisps, 108 Iowa, 605. We are the better content with this result-,, as we are satisfied that the judgment of the district court is correct. — AeeirMed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40428 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. ARNOLDO HERNANDEZ

- GUTIERREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 1214

- 1

Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Arnoldo Hernandez

Gutierrez raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d 303, 308

- 09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an ele ment of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. Knowledge of drug type and quantity also is not an element of the offense under the related statutes of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and § 960. United States

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 16, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40428 Document: 00512871334 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2014No 14

- 40428
v. Restrepo

- Granda , 575 F.2d 524, 527 (5th Cir. 1978); see United States v. Valencia

- Gonzales , 172 F.3d 344, 345

- 46 (5th Cir. 1999). The unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-40428 Document: 00512871334 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/16/2014