alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3018

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect to municipal

deposits.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 7, 2000

Mr. TORRICELLI (for himself and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect

to municipal deposits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Municipal Deposit In5 surance Protection Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. FDIC INSURANCE OF MUNICIPAL DEPOSITS.

7 Section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Deposit Insurance

8 Act (12 U.S.C. 1821(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the

9 end the following:
2

•S 3018 IS

1 ‘‘(C)(i) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the de2 posits of an in-State municipal depositor at an insured de3 pository institution shall be insured in an amount equal

4 to the total amount of those deposits.

5 ‘‘(ii) In this subparagraph—

6 ‘‘(I) the term ‘in-State municipal depositor’

7 means a municipal depositor that is located in the

8 same State as the office or branch of the insured de9 pository institution at which the deposits of that de10 positor are held; and

11 ‘‘(II) the term ‘municipal depositor’ means a

12 depositor described in any of clauses (i) through (v)

13 of subparagraph (A).’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Affordable Green Homes International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael P Vahl, principal accounting officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Affordable Green Homes
International, Inc.






AFFORDABLE
      GREEN HOMES INTERNATIONALDated:
      February 17, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Michael P
      VahlMichael
      P VahlPrincipal
      Accounting officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2860

For the relief of Sammie Martine Orr.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 13, 2000

Mr. ENZI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Sammie Martine Orr.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMI4 GRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the administration of the Im6 migration and Nationality Act, Sammie Martine Orr shall

7 be classified as a child within the meaning of section

8 101(b)(1)(F) of such Act, upon approval of a petition filed

9 on his behalf by the alien’s adopting parents, citizens of

10 the United States, pursuant to section 204 of such Act.

11 (b) LIMITATION.—No natural parent, brother, or sis12 ter, if any, of Sammie Martine Orr shall, by virtue of such
2

•S 2860 IS

1 relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status

2 under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act**I, Stephen F. Groth, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific Asia Petroleum, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  November 9, 2007 By:  /s/ Stephen F. Groth    Name:  Stephen F. Groth    Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Wowio, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Altounian, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Date:
    April 11, 2014 | By: | /s/
    Brian Altounian                                                
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |     | Brian
    Altounian                                                    
|                         |     | Chief
    Executive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3612-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Connecticut (FEMA-3612-EM), dated August 21, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued September 30, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective August 19, 2024.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-24646 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit
      32











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Software, Inc. a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
      Marinus Jellema, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1)
                The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and





(2)
                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.













/s/
      Marinus Jellema


Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer


Date:
      February 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 (File No.
333-64066) of our report dated February 22, 2005 on our audit of the financial
statements of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the
years then ended, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2004.




Eisner LLP


New York, New York
April 11, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7610
In Re: JOHN WESLEY MILLS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-96-986) Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Wesley Mills, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Wesley Mills has filed a petition for a writ of mandamusasking this court to compel the district court to expedite its consideration of the Government’s motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). The granting of a writ ofmandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary circumstances. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). A petitioner must show that he has a clear right to the relief sought, that the respondent has a clear duty to perform the act requested by petitioner, and that there is no other adequate remedy available. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mills has failed to make the requisite showing for such extraordinary relief. Our review of the district court docket sheet discloses that there has been no undue delay in considering the Government’s motion. Although we grant Mills’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Patch International Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ending May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Stadnyk,
President and Treasurer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ DAVID STADNYK
----------------------------------------------
David Stadnyk, President and Treasurer
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 407

To reduce gun trafficking by prohibiting bulk purchases of handguns.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. ROBB, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERRY, and Ms.

MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To reduce gun trafficking by prohibiting bulk purchases of

handguns.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Gun Trafficking

5 Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST MULTIPLE HANDGUN SALES

7 OR PURCHASES.

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 922 of title 18, United

9 States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (y)

10 the following:
2

•S 407 IS

1 ‘‘(z) PROHIBITION AGAINST MULTIPLE HANDGUN

2 SALES OR PURCHASES.—

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for any

4 licensed dealer—

5 ‘‘(A) during any 30-day period, to sell 2 or

6 more handguns to an individual who is not li7 censed under section 923; or

8 ‘‘(B) to sell a handgun to an individual

9 who is not licensed under section 923 and who

10 purchased a handgun during the 30-day period

11 ending on the date of the sale.

12 ‘‘(2) TIME LIMITATION.—It shall be unlawful

13 for any individual who is not licensed under section

14 923 to purchase 2 or more handguns during any 30-

15 day period.

16 ‘‘(3) EXCHANGES.—Paragraph (1) does not

17 apply to an exchange of 1 handgun for 1 handgun.’’.

18 (b) PENALTIES.—Section 924(a)(2) of title 18,

19 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘or (o)’’ and

20 inserting ‘‘(o), or (z)’’.

21 SEC. 3. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR MAKING KNOWINGLY

22 FALSE STATEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH

23 FIREARMS.

24 Section 924(a)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is

25 amended by striking ‘‘one year’’ and inserting ‘‘5 years’’.
3

•S 407 IS

1 SEC. 4. DEADLINES FOR DESTRUCTION OF RECORDS RE2 LATED TO CERTAIN FIREARMS TRANSFERS.

3 (a) HANDGUN TRANSFERS SUBJECT TO THE WAIT4 ING PERIOD.—Section 922(s)(6)(B)(i) of title 18, United

5 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘20 business days’’

6 and inserting ‘‘35 calendar days’’.

7 (b) FIREARMS TRANSFERS SUBJECT TO INSTANT

8 CHECK.—Section 922(t)(2)(C) of title 18, United States

9 Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘not later than 35 calendar

10 days after the date the system provides the licensee with

11 the number,’’ before ‘‘destroy’’.

12 SEC. 5. REVISED DEFINITION.

13 Section 921(a)(21)(C) of title 18, United States

14 Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘, except that such term

15 shall include any person who transfers more than 1 hand16 gun in any 30-day period to a person who is not a licensed

17 dealer’’ before the semicolon.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60482

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MALCOLM JAMES HARGROVE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:00-CR-72-1-P

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Malcolm James Hargrove, federal prisoner # 11229-042

(“Hargrove”), appeals the district court’s denial of his motion

for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). 

Hargrove’s motion stems from his guilty-plea conviction for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine,

for which he received the statutory mandatory-minimum 60-month

sentence pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B). Hargrove had
No. 01-60482

-2-

unsuccessfully requested a safety-valve reduction in his sentence

pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines § 5C1.2. He

did not appeal his sentence. The present motion asserts that he

was entitled to a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

because he qualified for the safety valve.

Hargrove’s sentence-reduction motion was not authorized by

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which permits a defendant to seek a

sentence reduction when the term of imprisonment is based on

a sentencing range that subsequently has been lowered. See

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142

(5th Cir. 1994). Hargrove’s sentence was based on the statutory

mandatory-minimum sentence, not a sentencing range, and the

safety-valve provision was in place at the time of sentencing and

therefore does not constitute a new sentencing guideline for

purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Although the district court

did not specify the reason for the denial of the motion, it

should have been denied for lack of jurisdiction, Early, 27 F.3d

at 142, and we affirm on that basis.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports datedJune 12, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc on Form 10-K for the year ended April 6, 2008. Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Magma Design Automation, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-108346, effective February 13, 2004 and File No. 333-141886, effectiveApril 30, 2007) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-74278, effective November 30, 2001, File No. 333-92324, effective July 12, 2002, File No. 333-108348, effective August 29, 2003, File No. 333-112326, effectiveJanuary 30, 2004, File No. 333-122656, effective February 9, 2005, File No. 333-132333, effective March 10, 2006, and File No. 333-143551, effective June 6, 2007). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

San Jose, California

June 12, 2008
/S>
/&E-' •Mitsui <&>Ss9 J?x>. iS. 7aJ£ SJZ&7Z: £>J^- 7&JC0-5
_ 

### FILED IN , 

# teaAT-asr At*/*** ASus^a. sa-s^aaetfz. -e^COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS RAR 27 iuld 'To &J<h>£^1 JT~ >x7y?</ dJ><u>'-0*EA>S' •' Abel Acosta, Clerk 

### GV&UJsdMT-s*?J?s/ £j#£<L£y/>7- ^ 53AV Z97& aaaz. a</?Z 9&S'3) ttsav- 7?S^

i 

### RECEIVED

MAR 19 2015 COURT OF APPEALS WACO, TEXAS 

# RECEIVED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS Ab@SAcosta, Cf©rk Ti^^j) An/DC . 7SXJ& OC3<,7
**CERTIFICATION      OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER **

**AND      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    | /s/                Richard Cole                                                                                      |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Richard                Cole,Chief                  Executive Officer(principal                    executive officer) |

|   | /s/                Keith Wesp                                                                                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Keith                Wesp,Vice                  President of Finance(principal                    financial officer) |

----