alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THE STATE v. JOHN HARRIS.

An indictment for stealing “fifty pounds of flour, of the value of sixpence,” is good; and is sustained by proof that the party charged stole a *scialc*of flour, although there was no proof of its weight, or of its value further than that the defendant had said that he gave five and a half dollars for it.

Larceny, tried *before.Toargee,*./., at Fall Term 1869, of Chatham Court.

The indictment described the article taken, as *u*Fifty pounds of flour, of the value of sixpence.” A special verdict was-found : viz:

1. That the defendant had stolen, &c., “ one sack of flour the property of,” &c.

2. That there was no evidence of its weight.

3. That the only evidence of its value, was an allegation of defendant given in evidence, that he paid $5 50 for it.

Thereupon, His Honor ordered a verdict of Not G-uilty to he entered, and gave Judgment accordingly ; and the Solicitor for the State appealed.

*Attorney-General,*for the State.

No Counsel, *contra.*

Reade, J.

The object of describing property stolen by its quality and quantity, is that it may appear to the Court *128to be of value. Tbe object of describing it by its usual name, ownership, &o., is to enable tbe defendant to make bis defence, and to protect himself against a second conviction.

In the case under consideration, tbe substance of tbe charge, is, steabng flour — fifty pounds of flour — from which it is apparent that it was of value; and the exact quantity and value need not be proved. The objection made, is, that it was a *u sac*7c of flour;” by which we understand *flour*in a sack or bag. If the defendant stole the flour, it makes no difference whether it was in a sack, or bag, or box, or lying about loose. It was of value, and its character was not changed. An indictment charged the stealing of “ a parcel of oats held to be sufficient. So another indictment charged the stealing of a “ hogthe proof was a shoat: held to be sufficient. But proof of stealing mutton will not support a charge of stealing a sheep, for the things are different.

In the case under consideration, the proof of stealing a sack of flour, i. e., flour in a sack or bag, sustains the charge of stealing flour, and it was not necessary to prove its exact weight or value. . , ■

There is error. This will be certified, to the end that there may be judgment in the Court below upon the verdict, according to law.

Pee Cubiam. Error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                        2,105
<SECURITIES>                                    393
<RECEIVABLES>                                   525
<ALLOWANCES>                                     90
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              3,066
<PP&E>                                          528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                3,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           716
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          3
<OTHER-SE>                                    4,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  3,370
<SALES>                                       2,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,112
<CGS>                                           566
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.28)


</TABLE>
|   | (1)    | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Osler Incorporated for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Osler Incorporated.                                                                          |

| Dated: February 8, 2011 |                        |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                    |                        |
|                    | /s/ C. Leo Smith            |
|                    | C. Leo Smith, President,    |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer and |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer     |

----
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 361

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to John R. and Margaret

J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land so as to correct

an error in the patent issued to their predecessors in interest.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. THOMAS) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to John

R. and Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land so as to correct an error in the

patent issued to their predecessors in interest.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF LOWE FAMILY PROPERTY.

4 (a) CONVEYANCE.—Subject to valid existing rights,

5 the Secretary of the Interior is directed to issue, without

6 consideration, a quitclaim deed to John R. and Margaret

7 J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, to the land de8 scribed in subsection (b): Provided, That all minerals un-
2

S 361 IS

1 derlying such land are hereby reserved to the United

2 States.

3 (b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land referred to in

4 subsection (a) is the approximately 40-acre parcel located

in the SW1⁄4SE1 5 ⁄4 of Section 11, Township 51 North,

6 Range 96 West, 6th Principal Meridian, Wyoming.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                                     CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Network-l Security Solutions, Inc.

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the Network-1 Security
Solutions, Inc. and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report
dated March 8, 2007 related to the financial statements of Network-1 Security
Solutions, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 included in its
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                             /s/ Radin, Glass & Co., LLP
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Radin, Glass & Co., LLP
                                             Certified Public Accountants
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 322 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.322

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to add the Martin Luther King Jr. 
   holiday to the list of days on which the flag should especially be 
                               displayed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY TO LIST OF DAYS.

    Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, third Monday in 
January;'' after ``January 20;''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 23.1




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-68163 of Clark, Inc. on Form S-8, in the Registration Statement No.
333-68982 of Clark, Inc. on Form S-8, in the Registration Statement No.
333-46104 on Clark, Inc. on Form S-3 and in the Registration Statement No.
333-106538 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 5, 2004 (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
adoption of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets"), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Clark, Inc.
and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003.


/s/ DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP


March 11, 2004
#### Goodman’s administrator *v.*Armistead.

From Chowan.

A subpoena is good which is tested in a certain year of American Independence, though the year of our Lord is not named.

This was a *set. fa.*to the defendant as a defaulting witness, to which lie appeared and pleaded, *“nultiel record,*never summoned, prevented by sickness.” The jury found the issues for the plaintiff, and the Court adjudged there was such a record, and gave judgment for plaintiff: w'hereupon defendant appealed to this Court.

The evidence that defendant was summoned was a sub-pcena, perfect in all its parts, and regular, save that the year in which it issued was not named; it being tested “the 7th day of April in the XLY year of our Independence, Anno Dom. 182 — .” This subpoena was returned liy the sheriff “ executed.”

*Hogg,*for plaintiff.

*L. Martin,*for defendant.

Tatxor, Chief Justice. —

The only objection taken to this subpoena, is the omission of the date of the year of our Lord, or rather, the omission of the unit figure; but as the forty-fifth year of the independence is inserted, there can be no difficulty in ascertaining the other period. In England, the year of the king’s reign forms a part of the date, to which the year of our Lord is regularly and usually added; but if the latter were omitted, the year of the reign being a matter of so much notoriety, is considered sufficient always to supply the omission. The Court will always notice what is the year of our Lord, from a statement of the year of the reign; for where a deed was declared upon as bearing date the *9.6th August,*13 *Will.*3. and upon oyer, the date actually in the deed was *26th August,*1701; it was held to be no variance, anil *20it must so be understood from the. first date. (2 *Ld. Raym. 795.) The era of our independence is a more certain rule*compUtation of time, than the year a king begins j,¡g re¡gn> as being more familiarly known to the mass of citizens.

And as the year of our Lord may be ascertained by the year of the reign, so where the latter is omitted, it is sufficient even in an indictment, if the time be ascertained by other means. *Kelyng*10, 11. Upon the whole, it cannot be doubted that this is sufficient evidence of the party being subpoenaed.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affiimed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT (23)

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Banc Corporation
Birmingham, Alabama

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-72747, No. 333-58170, No. 333-70953, No.
333-123397 and No. 333-123398) of The Banc Corporation of our report dated April
20, 2005, relating to The Banc Corporation management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of The Banc Corporation and
subsidiaries appearing in the Company's Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.



/s/ Carr, Riggs & Ingram LLC

Montgomery, Alabama
May 2, 2005
Exhibit 32





Section 1350 Certifications




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Shearson American REIT, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:




To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  November 9, 2010





/s/ John Williams


John Williams


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





Dated:  November 9, 2010





/s/ John D. Glassgow


John D. Glassgow


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1018

WILLIAM A. BLAGOGEE,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INCORPORATED,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:11-cv-00680-AJT-TRJ)

Submitted: May 30, 2012 Decided: July 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Blagogee, Appellant Pro Se. Travis Aaron Sabalewski, 

REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Mark Edward Schaffer, REED 

SMITH, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William A. Blagogee appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his complaint alleging violations of the Truth 

in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1601 to 1667(f) (West 2009 & 

Supp. 2012), and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 

U.S.C. §§ 1692 to 1692p (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Blagogee v. Santander

Consumer USA, Inc., No. 1:11-cv-00680-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed 

Nov. 29, 2011 & entered Nov. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 4.2 [chinaagro20f123107ex42001.jpg]   [chinaagro20f123107ex42002.jpg]  2   [chinaagro20f123107ex42003.jpg]  3   [chinaagro20f123107ex42004.jpg]  4   [chinaagro20f123107ex42005.jpg]  5   [chinaagro20f123107ex42006.jpg]  6   [chinaagro20f123107ex42007.jpg]  7   [chinaagro20f123107ex42008.jpg]  8   [chinaagro20f123107ex42009.jpg]  9   [chinaagro20f123107ex42010.jpg]  10   [chinaagro20f123107ex42011.jpg]  11   [chinaagro20f123107ex42012.jpg]  12   [chinaagro20f123107ex42013.jpg]  13   [chinaagro20f123107ex42014.jpg]  14   [chinaagro20f123107ex42015.jpg]  15   [chinaagro20f123107ex42016.jpg]  16   [chinaagro20f123107ex42017.jpg]  17   [chinaagro20f123107ex42018.jpg]  18   [chinaagro20f123107ex42019.jpg]  19   [chinaagro20f123107ex42020.jpg]  20   [chinaagro20f123107ex42021.jpg]  21   [chinaagro20f123107ex42022.jpg]  22   [chinaagro20f123107ex42023.jpg]  23   [chinaagro20f123107ex42024.jpg]  24   [chinaagro20f123107ex42025.jpg]  25   [chinaagro20f123107ex42026.jpg]  26   [chinaagro20f123107ex42027.jpg]  27   [chinaagro20f123107ex42028.jpg]  28   [chinaagro20f123107ex42029.jpg]  29   [chinaagro20f123107ex42030.jpg]  30   [chinaagro20f123107ex42031.jpg]  31   [chinaagro20f123107ex42032.jpg]  32   [chinaagro20f123107ex42033.jpg]  33   [chinaagro20f123107ex42034.jpg]  34   [chinaagro20f123107ex42035.jpg]  35   [chinaagro20f123107ex42036.jpg]  36   [chinaagro20f123107ex42037.jpg]  37   [chinaagro20f123107ex42038.jpg]  38   [chinaagro20f123107ex42039.jpg]  39   [chinaagro20f123107ex42040.jpg]  40   [chinaagro20f123107ex42041.jpg]  41   [chinaagro20f123107ex42042.jpg]  42   [chinaagro20f123107ex42043.jpg]  43   [chinaagro20f123107ex42044.jpg]  44   [chinaagro20f123107ex42045.jpg]  45   [chinaagro20f123107ex42046.jpg]  46   [chinaagro20f123107ex42047.jpg]  47   [chinaagro20f123107ex42048.jpg]  48
S. 460

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan Street

in South Bend, Indiana, as the ‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy

Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT K. RODIBAUGH UNITED STATES

BANKRUPTCY COURTHOUSE.

The United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan

Street in South Bend, Indiana, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘Robert K. Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1

| 1)   | T he Report fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:              | /s/      J. Michael Pearson                    |
|------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| May      8, 2008 | J.      Michael Pearson                        |
|             | President      and Chief Executive Officer     |
|             |                                           |
|             |                                           |
|             |                                           |
| By:              | /s/      Mark R. Stauffer                      |
| May      8, 2008 | Mark      R. Stauffer                          |
|             | Vice      President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

May 29, 2008

Before

Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 06

‐ 3807

JAMES CIOMBER, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff

‐ Appellant , Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Western Division.

v.
No. 04 C 50129

COOPERATIVE PLUS, INC., Defendant

‐ Appellee . Philip G. Reinhard, Judge

.

O R D E R

The slip opinion issued in the above

‐ entitled cause on May 28, 2008, is amended

as follows:

Page 4, second paragraph, first sentence, third line, delete “for.”
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cardo Medical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derrick Romine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ DERRICK  ROMINE
                      Derrick RomineChief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:  May 15, 2009

---