alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. 3239

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide special immigrant status

for certain United States international broadcasting employees.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT STATUS FOR CERTAIN UNITED

STATES INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING EMPLOYEES.

(a) SPECIAL IMMIGRANT CATEGORY.—Section 101(a)(27) of the

Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)) is

amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (K);

(2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (L);

and

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

‘‘(M) subject to the numerical limitations of section

203(b)(4), an immigrant who seeks to enter the United States

to work as a broadcaster in the United States for the International Broadcasting Bureau of the Broadcasting Board of

Governors, or for a grantee of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, and the immigrant’s accompanying spouse and children.’’.

(b) NUMERICAL LIMITATIONS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 203(b)(4) of the Immigration and

Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(4)) is amended by inserting

before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, and not more

than 100 may be made available in any fiscal year to special

immigrants, excluding spouses and children, who are described

in section 101(a)(27)(M)’’.
S. 3239—2

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by paragraph

(1) shall apply to visas made available in any fiscal year beginning on or after October 1, 2000.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127799 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 127799 

 COA: 255486 

Wayne CC: 99-006318 

GREGORY J. PURIFOY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2004 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
EX-10.1: CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT



 



Exhibit 10.1



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

BED BATH & BEYOND INC.

(Under Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law)



         It is certified that:


         1.     The name of the corporation is BED BATH & BEYOND INC. The name
under which the corporation was originally formed is B & B TEXTILE CORPORATION.


         2.     The original Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation was
filed by the Department of State of the State of New York on October 5, 1971.


         3.     Paragraph (a) of Article Fourth of the Certificate of
Incorporation is amended as follows to increase the number of shares from the
presently authorized 350,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per
share, to 900,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share. The
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, shall remain
unchanged.


         "(a) Authorized Classes of Stock: The total number of shares which
the corporation shall have the authority to issue is 901,000,000 of which
900,000,000 shares are designated Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
(“Common Stock”), and 1,000,000 shares are designated Preferred Stock, par
value $.01 per share (“Preferred Stock”)”.


         4.     The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation was authorized
first by vote of the Board of Directors of the corporation and then by the vote
of the holders of a majority of all outstanding shares entitled to vote theron.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have subscribed this document on July 26, 2001 and
do hereby affirm, under the penalties of perjury, that the statements contained
herein have been examined by us and are true and correct.



	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
	
	
	

	 	 	
/s/ Steven H. Temares
	 	 	


	 	 	
STEVEN H. TEMARES, President
	
	
	
	

	 	 	 
	
	
	
	

	 	 	
/s/ Warren Eisenberg
	 	 	


	 	 	
WARREN EISENBERG, Secretary




-12-
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.11

AMENDMENT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

International Microcomputer Software, Inc. and ArtToday.com, Inc. (hereinafter
collectively "IMSI") and Imageline, Inc., George P. Riddick, III, and any
assignees (hereinafter collectively "Imageline") hereby agree to amend the
Settlement Agreement between the parties dated July 27, 2001 ("Amendment") as
follows:

           1.  All references to "closing" in the Settlement Agreement shall
               mean the earlier of a) the date upon which the merger of IMSI and
               DCDC becomes legally final and binding, or b) November 30, 2001.

           2.  Paragraph 4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the
               following: "IMSI hereby agrees to dismiss its appeal of the
               arbitration award in favor of Imageline currently pending before
               the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals."

           3.  Additional language is added as Paragragh 7 as follows: "IMSI
               hereby warrants that it has rights to license the 50,000 clip art
               images licensed to Imageline under this Settlement Agreement, and
               agrees to indemnify Imageline from any claims by third parties as
               to copyright ownership, infringement, or other claims of misuse
               of the images by Imageline, including the reimbursement of any
               actual costs of product recalls, re-manufacturing, or
               re-packaging, and related legal fees and expenses, incurred by
               Imageline as a result of any such claim by third parties, except
               to the extent such claims of misuse are attributeable solely to
               the actions of Imageline."

           4.  Additional language is added as Paragraph 8 as follows: "IMSI
               hereby warrants that no changes have been made to the inventory
               on hand that includes Imageline clip art illustrations,
               including, but not limited to all MasterClips product inventory,
               since the original ROI sales proposal was made, and that no
               changes will be made prior to the closing of this Agreement as
               called for in this Amendment."

           5.  Additional language is added as Paragraph 9 as follows: "All
               MasterClips royalty accruals, as called for in the original
               Settlement Agreement executed July 27, 2001 will continue to
               accrue from August 31, 2001 in accordance with the terms and
               conditions called for in the original July 27, 2001 Settlement
               Agreement."

           6.  All other terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement shall
               remain as originally written and are hereby reaffirmed.

Dated: September 24, 2001               Dated:  September 21, 2001
       ------------------------------           --------------------------------

By:    /s/ GORDON LANDIS                 By:    /s/ GEORGE P. RIDDICK III
       ------------------------------           --------------------------------
       IMSI                                     Imageline


                                      144
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, October 22, 2024, 10 a.m. to October 23, 2024, 2 p.m., NIEHS, Keystone, 530 Davis Drive, Durham, NC 27709 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 26, 2024, 89 FR 68451.                

This notice is being amended due to a change in the meeting date. Dr. Leroy Worth's October 22-23, 2024 meeting is being rescheduled to December 3-4, 2024. The time and location will remain the same. This meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 17, 2024.

Bruce A. George, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2024-24452 Filed 10-21-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yellow Hill Energy Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay
Jhaveri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
27th day of February, 2009.


/s/ Jay Jhaveri
--------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
p100059.eng INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT s PMN: 10-0059 Focus Ready Draft 12/14/2009 ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ AH PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: Respirator: Health Effects:
TLV/PEL:

CRSS : Chemical Name: S-H20: g/L @ VP: torr @ MW: %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: Neat:

Consumer Use: SAT (concerns) (12/01/2009): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: Slow PBT rating: P3B2T2 PMN P1B1T2; Incin Pdt P3B2T2 Health: 2-3 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalationp100059.eng Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 9ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:
EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 10-0059 Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note:p100059.eng

Output 2: to: from: basis:
Output 2: to: from: basis
RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:
Dermal: Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: Basis: INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 10-0059 Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis:p100059.eng Process Description:
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note:

Output 2: to: from: basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:
Dermal: Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: Basis:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








Ryan
      Goldstein, the President, Treasurer, and Director of Lightview, Inc. (the
“Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes
      of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
      Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Date:
              November 2, 2007Signature:
              /s/ Ryan
                GoldsteinName: Ryan
                GoldsteinTitle: 
                  President, Treasurer, and Director (Principal Executive,
                  Financial, and
                  Accounting Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




10
Prepared by MerrillDirect





FIRST AMENDMENT TO ADVANCE
AGREEMENT


             Phoenix
Metals U.S.A. II, Inc.
(hereinafter “Phoenix Metals”) and Robert F. and Diana L. Flaherty, Inc. (hereinafter “Flaherty”) hereby agree to
this first amendment to the Advance Agreement previously executed between the
parties on December 1, 1999, with respect to the terms and conditions
under which cash advances have been made periodically from Flaherty to Phoenix
Metals.


             Notwithstanding
the language contained in the Advance Agreement with respect to Phoenix Metals
paying the outstanding cash advances from Flaherty in lawful money of the
United States, Phoenix Metals may satisfy the accrued unpaid principal and
interest by exchanging Phoenix Metals common capital stock, or such other
Phoenix Metals securities selected by Phoenix Metals for the outstanding
debt.  In this respect, the parties
agree that, effective November 19, 1999, Flaherty has agreed and accepted
3,000,000 shares of Phoenix Metals Common stock in exchange of the $3,263,191
in outstanding cash advances and accrued interest as of June 30, 1999.


In all other respects, the Advance
Agreement remains in full force and effect.


Dated January 28, 2000


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Robert F. Flaherty	 	/s/ Diana L. Flaherty
	

	 	


	Robert F. Flaherty, President Phoenix
  Metals	 	Diana L. Flaherty, Chairperson

  Robert F. and Diana L. Flaherty, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Diana L. Flaherty	 	/s/ Robert F.
  Flaherty
	

	 	


	Diana L. Flaherty, Chairperson

  Phoenix Metals	 	Robert F. Flaherty, President

  Robert F. & Diana L. Flaherty, Inc.
Order entered April 28, 2014 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00514-CV 

IN RE ROBERT PAYNE WATSON, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 397th Judicial District Court 

Grayson County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 062770 

ORDER 

Before Justices Francis, Myers and Schenck 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. Although we have considered the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of 

the filing fee, we DENY as moot relator’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We ORDER

relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding. 

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

 JUSTICE
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 508 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]






                                                        Calendar No. 26
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 508

To prohibit implementation of ``Know Your Customer'' regulations by the 
                       Federal banking agencies.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 1999

  Mr. Santorum (for himself and Mr. Allard) introduced the following 
                  bill; which was read the first time

                             March 3, 1999

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To prohibit implementation of ``Know Your Customer'' regulations by the 
                       Federal banking agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPLEMENTATION.

    (a) In General.--No regulation or amendment thereto prescribed by 
the Secretary of the Treasury or any Federal banking agency under 
subchapter II or III of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, 
chapter 2 of Public Law 91-508, or any other provision of Federal law, 
that requires a depository institution or any other private entity to 
obtain information concerning any person in connection with a financial 
transaction between such person and the depository institution or other 
private entity (commonly referred to as ``know your customer'' 
regulations) may be implemented or otherwise take effect on or after 
the date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Definitions.--The terms ``Federal banking agency'' and 
``depository institution'' have the same meanings as in section 3 of 
the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
                                     





                                                        Calendar No. 26

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 508

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To prohibit implementation of ``Know Your Customer'' regulations by the 
                       Federal banking agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 3, 1999

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar`
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Selective Service System

# AGENCY:

Selective Service System.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the names of the members of the Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lee Levells, Human Resources Officer, Selective Service System, 1501 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22209, telephone: 703-605-4011.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Sec. 4314(c) (1) through (5) of title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more performance review boards. The board shall review and evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, along with any recommendations to the appointing authority relative to the performance of the senior executive.

## The Members of the Performance Review Board Are

1. Mark Blythe, Director of Field Service, U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

2. Peggy Gartner, Deputy Office Head, Office of Information and Resource Management, National Science Foundation

3. Leslie Bayless, Chief Operating Officer, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

Daniel A. Lauretano, Sr.,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2024-24311 Filed 10-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8015-01-P
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of S.L.F

. , a child * From the 446 th District Court

of E ctor County,

Trial Court No. CC

- 24,291

No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 114

- C V * May 26, 2022

* Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J., and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t he appeal

should be dismissed for want of prosecution . Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-9006

IN RE: VINCENT F. ZARRILLI

VINCENT F. ZARRILLI,

Debtor, Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Creditor, Appellee,

DOREEN B. SOLOMON; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

[Hon. Joan N. Feeney, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge]

Before

Torruella, Circuit Judge,

 Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
Vincent F. Zarrilli on brief pro se.

Ann S. DuRoss, Assistant General Counsel, Colleen J. Boles,

Senior Counsel, and Jaclyn C. Taner, Counsel, on brief for

appellee Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

JUNE 28, 2001
-3-

Per Curiam. In this appeal, pro se appellant

Vincent F. Zarrilli appeals from a decision by the

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") affirming the bankruptcy

court's denial of certain motions he filed in two bankruptcy

proceedings. In its decision, the BAP concluded that the

doctrine of res judicata barred Zarrilli's claims. We

affirm, essentially for the reasons given by the BAP in its

decision dated April 19, 2000. 

In the present appeal, Zarrilli disputes the BAP's

ruling in only one pertinent respect. He suggests that

rulings by this court in a prior appeal were not decisions

"on the merits" for res judicata purposes because the

rulings failed to adequately explain the court's adverse

decision. We find this claim meritless. The rulings in

question did explain the decision reached by the court, and,

in any event, a court's failure to explain a decision does

not mean that the decision is not "on the merits." See C.

Wright, A. Miller & E. Cooper, 18 Fed. Prac & Proc. § 4435,

at 348 (2001 Supp.) ("Finally, it should be clear that a

decision may be 'on the merits' even though it is reached

without opinion or other explanation.") (citations omitted).
-4-

Affirmed.