alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 447 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.447

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
   To deem as timely filed, and process for payment, the applications 
submitted by the Dodson School Districts for certain Impact Aid payments 
                          for fiscal year 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPACT AID.

    The Secretary of Education shall deem as timely filed, and shall 
process for payment, an application for a fiscal year 1999 payment 
under section 8003 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703) from a local educational agency serving each of 
the following school districts if the Secretary receives that 
application not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act:
        (1) The Dodson Elementary School District #2, Montana.
        (2) The Dodson High School District, Montana.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-46104) and in the related Prospectus of Clark/Bardes, Inc.
pertaining to the registration of 1,888,887 shares of its common stock, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-68163) pertaining to the 1998 Non-
Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-68982) pertaining to the Clark/Bardes, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan of our
report dated February 22, 2002, with respect to the December 31, 2001 and 2000
consolidated financial statements of Clark/Bardes, Inc. included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.



ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 26, 2003
#### Junior (Floyd), Appellant, vs. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Ronald A. Padway,*attorney, and *A. W. Richter*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondents : *Willis G. Sullivan*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court,*— Judgment affirmed,
NO. 07-05-0340-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	FEBRUARY 10, 2006

	______________________________

	KERWIN GIBBS, APPELLANT

	V.

	ALLSUP’S CONVENIENCE STORES, INC. AND

	FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

	FEDERATED INSURANCE AN ASSUMED NAME

	OF FEDERATED 	MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

	AND/OR FEDERATED 	SERVICES INSURANCE COMPANY

	 AND DAWN WILLEFORD, APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2005-597,010; HONORABLE PAULA LANEHART, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

	By opinion dated December 16, 2005, this court dismissed appellant, Kerwin Gibbs’ appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b), (c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate procedure.  By motion for rehearing, appellant contends all matters in controversy were settled between the parties prior to this court’s order.  The pleadings and the motion for dismissal filed with the petition for rehearing confirm this contention.  Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is granted and the case is reinstated.

	Appellant has filed before this court a motion to dismiss the appeal, citing settlement of all matters in controversy.  Appellee has confirmed the settlement by a responsive pleading.  From the record it is clear that appellant does not desire to pursue the appeal. 

	Without passing on the merits of the appeal, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Pursuant to the motion, costs are to be assessed against the party incurring them.  Having dismissed the appeal by agreement of the parties, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

							Mackey K. Hancock

							         Justice
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

The Board of Directors

Albany Molecular Research, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the registration statements (No. 333-80477 and No. 333-91423)on Form S-8 of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. of our reports dated March 13,2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Albany MolecularResearch, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the relatedconsolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensiveincome (loss), and cash flows for the years then ended, and the relatedfinancial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, whichreports appear in the December 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of AlbanyMolecular Research, Inc. and subsidiaries. Our report on the consolidatedfinancial statements refers to changes in the method of accounting forshare-based payments and pension and other post retirement benefit obligationsin 2006.

/s/ KPMGLLP

Albany, New York

March 13, 2007

----
#### State ex rel. Krieser, Plaintiff, vs. Baird, Municipal Judge, Defendant.

*October 7*

November *4, 1941.*

*Leo D. Swidler*of Milwaukee, for the plaintiff.

*Henry J. Lockney*and *D. B. Malone,*both of Waukesha, for the defendant.

Wickhem, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *State ex rel. Beck v. Baird, ante,*p. 624, 300 N. W. 752, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Courts*— Let a writ of prohibition issue as prayed for in the petition.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Albany MolecularResearch IncSubsidiaries**

**AMR TechnologyInc.**

**AMRI BothellResearch Center Inc.**

**Albany MolecularResearch Export Corp.**

**OrganichemCorporation**

**Albany MolecularResearch Singapore Research Centre, PTE. LTD.**

**Albany MolecularResearch Hyderabad Research Centre, PTE. LTD.**

**AMR Mauritius Pvt.Ltd.**

***Kagyló 2005 Vagyonkezelő KorlátoltFelelősségű Társaság***

***Albany Molecular Luxembourg S.à r.l.***

***ComGenex Kutató-FejlesztőRészvénytársaság***

----
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 20, 2010

1213 

# Order

December 20, 2010

141809

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141809 COA: 290686 Kent CC: 07-013482-FH WILBERT TODD VANCE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 17, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
---

Page 125 of 126

EXHIBIT 8

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

ATI Technologies
Inc. (the Company) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2005 (the Report) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

I,
David Orton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/ David Orton                                                     | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|David Orton
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 22, 2005
# L_2011341EN.01001901.xml

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/19

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1361/2011

of 19 December 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Terre Aurunche (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy's application to register the name ‘Terre Aurunche’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy's application to register the name ‘Terre Aurunche’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 108, 7.4.2011, p. 14.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.5.   Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)

ITALY

Terre Aurunche (PDO)

---
S. 356

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain works, facilities, and

titles of the Gila Project, and designated lands within or adjacent to the Gila

Project, to the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District, and for other

purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Wellton-Mohawk Transfer

Act’’.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER.

The Secretary of the Interior (‘‘Secretary’’) is authorized to

carry out the terms of the Memorandum of Agreement No. 8–

AA–34–WAO14 (‘‘Agreement’’) dated July 10, 1998 between the

Secretary and the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District

(‘‘District’’) providing for the transfer of works, facilities, and lands

to the District, including conveyance of Acquired Lands, Public

Lands, and Withdrawn Lands, as defined in the Agreement.

SEC. 3. WATER AND POWER CONTRACTS.

Notwithstanding the transfer, the Secretary and the Secretary

of Energy shall provide for and deliver Colorado River water and

Parker-Davis Project Priority Use Power to the District in accordance with the terms of existing contracts with the District, including

any amendments or supplements thereto or extensions thereof and

as provided under section 2 of the Agreement.

SEC. 4. SAVINGS.

Nothing in this Act shall affect any obligations under the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act (Public Law 93–320, 43

U.S.C. 1571).

SEC. 5. REPORT.

If transfer of works, facilities, and lands pursuant to the Agreement has not occurred by July 1, 2000, the Secretary shall report

on the status of the transfer as provided in section 5 of the Agreement.
S. 356—2

SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION.

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may

be necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Meltdown Massage and Body Works, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Donald Gordon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1)       
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)       
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




Registrant
              
              Meltdown
      Massage and Body Works, Inc.Date:
      May 15, 2009
              
              By: /s/ Donald
      GordonDonald
      GordonChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-3229

___________________________ Horace Crosby, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant ,

v. Brian Little; Brae Harper; Randy Barrett; Coye Cripps; Gentry School District, Board of Education; Subteach USA, LLC; Education Solutions Services, LLC,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees .

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville

____________ Submitted: October 7, 2021 Filed: October 15, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________PER CURIAM.

Horace Crosby appeals an order of the district court 1 dismissing his civil action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for untimely service of the defendants. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. -2-
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                               WEEKS CORPORATION

               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Three Months   Three Months    Nine Months    Nine Months
                                                      Ended           Ended          Ended          Ended
(In thousands, except per share data)             Sept. 30,1996  Sept. 30,1995  Sept. 30, 1996  Sept. 30, 1995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>
Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                                     11,174          7,675          11,162           7,675
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options
  (determined under the Treasury Stock Method)               --             --              --              --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average number of common
  and common equivalent shares outstanding               11,174          7,675          11,162           7,675
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income                                              $ 3,033         $1,901         $ 9,226          $6,079
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per share data:
  Net income per share                                  $  0.27         $ 0.25         $  0.83          $ 0.79
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesus Alvarenga, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 553]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), rendered January 9, 2002, convicting him of assault in the second degree, aggravated criminal contempt, and criminal contempt in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]; *People v Soto,*293 AD2d 501 [2002]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
EX-4.4



 Exhibit 4.4 

AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE TO THE 

METLIFE INDIVIDUAL DISTRIBUTION SALES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

(As effective January 1, 2010) 

The MetLife Individual Distribution Sales Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2013, as follows: 

1. Section 8 is hereby amended by restating it in its entirety to read as follows: 

 

	“8.	Matching Contributions. 

 (a) If a Participant has a valid deferral election to make
contributions to SIP throughout a calendar year, the Participant’s Matching Contribution Account shall be credited with the amount of Matching Contribution (if any) with which the Participant’s SIP account would have been credited under
the terms and provisions of the SIP without application of certain Tax Code limitations under Code sections 41 5 and 40 1(a)(17) with respect to compensation deferred into this Plan. 

(b) Effective January 1, 2013, if a Participant has a valid deferral election to make contributions to SIP throughout a calendar year,
the Participant’s Matching Contribution Account under this Plan will no longer be credited with the Matching Contribution (if any) that would have been credited to the Participant’s SIP account without application of certain Tax Code
limitations referenced in (a) above. Instead, the Metropolitan Life Auxiliary Savings and Investment Plan shall be credited with the amount of Matching Contribution (if any) with which the Participant’s SIP account would have been credited
under the terms and provisions of the SIP without application of the Tax Code limitations described in (a) above, with respect to compensation deferred into this Plan. The funds in the Participant’s Matching Contribution Account in this
Plan that accrued prior to January 1, 2013 will remain in this Plan and governed by the terms of this Plan. Only prospective Matching Contributions accrued on or after January 1, 2013 are impacted by this subsection (b). 

(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Matching Contributions shall be credited in favor of a Participant during the suspension of such
Participant’s deferrals pursuant to Section 4.5 of this Plan. A Participant’s Matching Contribution Account shall vest or be forfeited to the same extent, and on the same vesting schedule, that such Matching Contributions would have
vested or been forfeited under the terms of the qualified 401(k) plan the Participant actively participated in at the time of deferral, notwithstanding any accelerated vesting under the SIP for individuals who transfer to MetLife Bank. A
Participant’s Matching Contributions made to the Metropolitan Life Auxiliary Savings and Investment Plan in accordance with subsection 8(b) of this Plan shall vest and otherwise be governed by the terms of the Metropolitan Life Auxiliary
Savings and Investment Plan.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Plan Administrator has caused this Amendment to be adopted this 26th day of December, 2012. 
  

	
	PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
	
	 /s/ Andrew J. Bernstein

	Andrew J. Bernstein


  

	
	ATTEST:
	
	 /s/ Mark J. Davis



  
 1