alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo)
CENTEX
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

P.O. Box 199000
Dallas, Texas 75219-9000
2728 North Harwood
Dallas, Texas 75201

Phone: 214 981-5000

                              MANAGEMENT ASSERTION

As of and for the year ended  March 31,  1999,  Centex  Credit  Corporation  has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for  Mortgage  Bankers  (except for minimum  servicing  standards I.4.,
III.3,  III.4,  V.3., and V.4.,  which apply only to those entities with service
contracts  covering  escrow accounts and therefore are  nonapplicable  to Centex
Credit Corporation).  As of and for this same period,  Centex Credit Corporation
had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and  omissions  policy in the amount of
$3,000,000.

Anthony H. Barone
President and Chief Executive Officer
Centex Credit Corporation

Date

8/2/99
EXHIBIT 10.35

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$200,000                                                         March 24, 2003


         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc.
("Cedric Kushner Promotions") hereby promises to pay to the order of Charles
Crispino ("Crispino") the principal sum of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
($200,000) in lawful money of the United States of America in immediately
available funds on or before August 1, 2003 (the "Maturity Date").

         Cedric Kushner Promotions agrees to pay a fee (the "Fee") to Crispino
equal to $20,000 on the Maturity Date, such Fee to represent reimbursement for
legal and administrative expenses as well as interest on the principal amount.

         Cedric Kushner Promotions hereby waives diligence, presentment, demand,
protest and notice of any kind whatsoever. The nonexercise by Crispino of any of
its rights hereunder in any particular instance shall not constitute a waiver
thereof in that or any subsequent instance. Cedric Kushner Promotions shall pay
on demand all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of collection,
including reasonable attorney fees incurred or paid by Crispino in enforcing
this Promissory Note.

         This Promissory Note shall be construed in accordance with and governed
by the laws of the State of New York. Cedric Kushner Promotions hereby
irrevocably (i) agrees that any litigation, action or proceeding arising out of
or relating to this Promissory Note may be instituted in any state or federal
court in the State of New York and (ii) waives any objection which it may have
to the venue of any such litigation, action or proceeding.

         This Promissory Note cannot be modified except by a written instrument
signed by each of Cedric Kushner Promotions and Crispino.

CEDRIC KUSHNER PROMOTIONS, INC.

By: ______________________
Name:
Title:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Clark M. Mower, Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas N. Strong, Chief Financial Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 21, 2010

*/s/Clark M. Mower*

Clark M. Mower

Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  May 21, 2010

/s/*Thomas N. Strong*

Thomas N. Strong

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               2,285
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        3,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                             713,157
<DEPRECIATION>                                      32,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     692,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                            376,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               183
<OTHER-SE>                                         235,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       692,225
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    74,241
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       24,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    18,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     13,892
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 13,892
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        13,892
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .63
                                                    

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0267. SIDNEY E. GOODWIN, JR. v. THE STATE.

In 2010, Sidney E. Goodwin, Jr., pled guilty to two counts of aggravated

assault. It does not appear that Goodwin filed a direct appeal of his conviction. In

2020, Goodwin filed a motion in which he sought to withdraw his guilty plea and

requested an out-of-time appeal. The superior court issued an order dismissing the

motion to the extent it sought to withdraw the guilty plea and denying it to the extent

it requested an out-of-time appeal. Goodwin then filed the instant timely application

for discretionary appeal.

1

The superior court’s order is notsubject to the discretionary appeal procedure,

see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a), and it appears that the order is subject to direct appeal. The

denial of a motion for an out-of-time appeal is directly appealable when the criminal

conviction at issue has not undergone appellate review. Romano v. State, 297 Ga.

497, 497 (775 SE2d 151) (2015). Orders resolving out-of-time motions to withdraw

guilty pleas have been treated by our Supreme Court as directly appealable. See

Ellison v. State, 283 Ga. 461 (660 SE2d 373) (2008); Smith v. State, 283 Ga. 376 (659

SE2d 380) (2008).

We will grant a timely discretionary application if the lower court’s order is

subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is

hereby GRANTED. Goodwin shall have ten days from the date of this order to file

a notice of appeal with the superior court, if he has not already done so. The clerk of

the superior court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record

1 Goodwin filed his application in the Supreme Court, which transferred it here.

April 12, 2021
transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/12/2021
Exhibit
32.2









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO









SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Ameritrans Capital
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2009 (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:









1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and









2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.









Date:
      September 28, 2009
            
            
            
            /s/
      Gary C. GranoffGary
      C. Granoff
              Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
NOTES TO CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000925054
<NAME>                                          SPECTRIAN CORP /DE/
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                           SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                             DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                                        21,364
<SECURITIES>                                                  49,593
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 19,008
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     385
<INVENTORY>                                                   16,503
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             111,261
<PP&E>                                                        63,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                                32,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               142,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         19,103
<BONDS>                                                        5,020
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                     139,145
<OTHER-SE>                                                   (20,478)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 142,790
<SALES>                                                       20,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              20,723
<CGS>                                                         31,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 31,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              10,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              (862)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (10,294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (10,294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (10,294)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.98)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2 - Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, James E. Lesch, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 7, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Lesch     
|                      |  |     |  | James E. Lesch         
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



16
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                                   MEMORANDUM

                        AND AMENDMENT OF PROMISSORY NOTE

DATE:         September 25, 2001

TO:           Peter T. Johnson and Andrea R. Johnson

FROM:         Innoveda, Inc.

RE:           Amendment of the Secured Promissory Note dated August 11, 1999
              in the Principal Amount of $69,300.00 Issued to Viewlogic
              Systems, Inc. (the "Note")



I am writing, on behalf of Innoveda, Inc. ("Innoveda"), to confirm Innoveda's
agreement, and obtain your agreement, that:

1.       All of the rights and obligations of Viewlogic Systems, Inc.
         ("Viewlogic") under the Note were assigned to, and assumed by,
         Innoveda.

2.       All of the rights and obligations of Viewlogic under the Stock Pledge
         Agreement that you executed in connection with the Note were assigned
         to, and assumed by, Innoveda.

3.       The Note is hereby amended by deleting from the Note the provision that
         requires that the Note become due and payable on "The date which is
         eighteen months after the first date, if any, on which the common stock
         of Viewlogic Systems, Inc. (or any security substituted therefor) is
         listed on a national securities exchange or the NASDAQ stock market".

4.       In all other respects the Note remains in full force and effect as
         originally written and as amended as set forth in this memorandum.

Agreed and accepted, and signed as a sealed instrument, by:

Innoveda, Inc.                              Peter Johnson and Andrea Johnson

By:    /s/ William Herman                   /s/ Peter T. Johnson
                                            /s/ Andrea R. Johnson

Title: CEO
# Eiropas Savienības C 146A/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 146A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 59. sējums2016. gada 26. aprīlis |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 146A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

59. sējums2016. gada 26. aprīlis

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Atzinumi |
| | ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS |
| | Revīzijas palāta |
| 2016/C 146A/01 | Rezerves saraksts (saņemtā novērtējuma secībā) — ECA/2015/JUR – Divas juristu amata vietas (AD 8 — AD 9 pakāpe) — Juridiskais dienests – Priekšsēdētāja birojs | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

V   Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Revīzijas palāta

2016/C 146A/01

Rezerves saraksts (saņemtā novērtējuma secībā) — ECA/2015/JUR – Divas juristu amata vietas (AD 8 — AD 9 pakāpe) — Juridiskais dienests – Priekšsēdētāja birojs

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

V Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Revīzijas palāta

| 26.4.2016 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 146/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2016

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 146/1

---

REZERVES SARAKSTS

(saņemtā novērtējuma secībā)

ECA/2015/JUR – Divas juristu amata vietas (AD 8 — AD 9 pakāpe)

Juridiskais dienests – Priekšsēdētāja birojs

(2016/C 146 A/01)

Georgios PRANTZOS

Johanne VERMER

Eléonore VON BARDELEBEN

Nunzio BAMBARA

Jan KLEIN

Vassilis KARANTOUNIAS

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E R I C K D AN I L O S OS A- S AL GE R O, A K A D ani elS osa, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 70807 A ge nc yN o. A 088- 724- 039 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E Ran dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E r i c k D ani l o S os a - S a l ge r o, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of a B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s orderdi sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an 

# FI LED MA Y17 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSi m m i gr a t i on j udge ' s de ni a l of hi s appl i c a t i on f

orc anc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l . O ur j u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U. S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . We d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency' s di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on that S o s a - S a lg e r o f

a ile dto s h o w e x c e p tio n a l an de x tr e m e lyu nu s u a l h ar d s h ip to h is U ni t ed S t at es ci t i ze n chi l d. 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2(a) (2)( B ); Mendez–Castro v. Mukasey , 55 2 F . 3d97 5, 97 9 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). S os a - S a l ge r o’ s c ont e nt i on, tha tthe B oar d f a i l e d t o pr ope r l yc ons i de rand w e i g h a l l e v i d e n c e o f

h ar d s h i p , d o e s n o tr a i s e ac o l o r ab l e du e p r o c e s s c l a i m. M art i nez–R osas v. G on zales , 4 2 4 F .3 d9 2 6 , 9 3 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D I SM I SSED .
#### Hyman-Michaels Company, Respondent, vs. Ashmus Equipment Sales Corporation, Appellant.

*December 7, 1956*

January *7, 1957.*

*528For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by *N. Paley Phillips*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Cavanagh, Mittel-staed, Sheldon, Heide & Hartley*of Kenosha, and oral argument by *William A. Sheldon.*

Fairchild, C. J.

Appellant insists that the judgment for costs and the judgment of the municipal court are decidedly separate, each from the other, although the supreme court has remitted its judgment for costs to the lower court where the final judgment was entered; and therefore the relief of setoff cannot be allowed. There is no occasion, under the circumstances now before us, for separate and distinct executions moving from different jurisdictions. The defendant points to sec. 331.07 (7), Stats., as authority, but that section provides that a setoff may be directed when the parties in interest are identical upon motion in the action in which the mover is the judgment debtor.

The proceedings now here for review arose in the case where the appellant and respondent are the identically interested parties. All liabilities affecting the identical parties arise out of the same matter. The effect of remitting a judgment for costs to the lower court must be given consideration. Under the law applicable to this situation, the settlement of *529the difference is within the control of the court, which in this instance is the municipal court of Kenosha county.

The merits as disclosed by the record, under the rules applicable, give occasion for a setoff. There may be instances where an application for issuing of a writ of execution must be addressed to the supreme court, b(pt they do not appear in the present proceeding. Under precedent and legislation, we must hold that the lower court gave due consideration to the rights of the respective parties. Secs. 272.04 (1), 274.35, Stats. “The policy of this court to set off mutual judgments in the absence of countervailing rights or equities has frequently been declared,” said Mr. Justice Owen in *Black v. Whitewater Comm. & Sav. Bank,*188 Wis. 24, 28, 205 N. W. 404.

There is but one action, although the merits were considered in a trial court and on appeal in the supreme court. The acts of the parties out of which the controversy arose related to the liabilities and obligations of each party to the other. Sec. 270.80, Stats., was a legislative declaration of the policy of offset. As amended in 1935, that section made certain that a “lower court” of record was, for the purposes here involved, on the same level as that of the circuit court. That section reads, in part: “And whenever the supreme court shall remit its judgment for . . . costs to the lower court such judgment shall in like manner be docketed by the clerk of said court and shall have the like force and effect as judgments of the circuit court so docketed.” r It was within the discretion of the lower court to do as it did and grant the .relief soiught by the respondent.

By *the Court.*— Orders affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
400 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-106, K2025-104.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24623 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P