alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Bedminster Capital Corp. (the “Company”)
on 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul
Patrizio, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
              The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
      Bedminster Capital Corp.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  BEDMINSTER
CAPITAL CORP.
  By:
              /s/
      Paul PatrizioPAUL
      PATRIZIOPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer,
                Chief
      Financial Officer,
  Date:
November 13, 2008
Exhibit 23.0

                          Consent of Radics & Co., LLC


<PAGE>








               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the previously
filed Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-84785) of West Essex Bancorp,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  of our report dated  February 16, 2001,  included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000.



                                                       /s/ Radics & Co., LLC
                                                       ---------------------
                                                       Radics & Co., LLC



March 26, 2001
Pine Brook, New Jersey
# Europeiska unionens C 146A/26 a

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 146A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 59 årgången26 april 2016 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 146A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

59 årgången26 april 2016

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Yttranden |
| | ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN |
| | Revisionsrätten |
| 2016/C 146A/01 | Reservlista (meritordning) — ECA/2015/JUR – Två tjänster som jurist (lönegraderna AD 8 och AD 9) — Rättstjänsten – Ordförandens avdelning | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

V   Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Revisionsrätten

2016/C 146A/01

Reservlista (meritordning) — ECA/2015/JUR – Två tjänster som jurist (lönegraderna AD 8 och AD 9) — Rättstjänsten – Ordförandens avdelning

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

V Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Revisionsrätten

| 26.4.2016 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 146/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2016

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 146/1

---

RESERVLISTA

(meritordning)

ECA/2015/JUR – Två tjänster som jurist (lönegraderna AD 8 och AD 9)

Rättstjänsten – Ordförandens avdelning

(2016/C 146 A/01)

Georgios PRANTZOS

Johanne VERMER

Eléonore VON BARDELEBEN

Nunzio BAMBARA

Jan KLEIN

Vassilis KARANTOUNIAS

---
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES



(1)  Resource Bank, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
     Resource Bankshares Corporation.

(2)  Resource Service Corporation, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned
     subsidiary of Resource Bank.
     (a) Financial Planners Mortgage, L.L.P., is a Virginia general partnership
         registered as a limited liability partnership,  in which Resource
         Service Corporation owns a 49% interest.

(3)  Resource Capital Trust I, a Delaware business trust, is a wholly-owned
     subsidiary of Resource Bankshares Corporation.

(4)  CW and Company of Virginia, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly-owned
     subsidiary of Resource Bank.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.22

July 26, 2001

Mike Mulica
SVP - OCO, Sales

Dear Mike,

At the Board of Directors meeting on July 20, 2001 a number of changes were made
to the executive compensation structure. As a result we've made some significant
changes to your compensation package. The details of the changes are outlined
below:

Base Pay:            .  Your base salary will be increased from $250,000 to
                        $300,000 per year, effective August 1, 2001.

Variable Pay:        .  Your target bonus opportunity will be increased from 75%
                        of your base salary to 100% of your base salary,
                        retroactive to January 1, 2001. This bonus opportunity
                        is based on achieving revenues of $600k for 2001.
                        Achieving the stretch revenue goal of $640k for 2001
                        will double your overall annual bonus opportunity.
                     .  A midyear bonus payout of $150,000 (minus your current
                        draw) has already been initiated.
                     .  Your monthly draw will be increased to your OTE level,
                        to $25,000/month, effective July 1, 2001.

Stock Options:       .  All of your unexercised stock options, both vested and
                        unvested, may be voluntarily cancelled (as part of the
                        BOD approved cancel and regrant program) in order to get
                        new options at a later date. You may consider the
                        11/1/99 and 1/3/00 stock option grants as part of this
                        cancel and re-grant program. The 20-business day
                        election period will begin August 13, 2001. The re-grant
                        will occur between March 12 and April 12, 2002.
                     .  We have modified the vesting schedule for the 100,000
                        stock options granted to you on 1/2/01. 100% of these
                        options will vest on January 2, 2002, if you achieve the
                        2001 stretch revenue goal of $640k. If you do not
                        achieve the annual revenue goal of $640k, then 25% of
                        this option grant will vest, with the remaining 75%
                        vesting on a monthly basis over the next 3 years.

Restricted Stock:    .  I am pleased to grant you 30,000 shares of restricted
                        stock, effective July 20, 2001, with a grant price of
                        $17.97/share. Restrictions on these shares lapse on
                        July 20, 2003.

Sincerely,


Don Listwin
Chairman, President and CEO
Openwave
#### Alfred Smith, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 45078.

April 2, 1940.

E. E. Hairgrove, Homer I. Smith, and Miller & Claussen, for appellant.

Frank W. Ellis, for appellee.

Mitchell, J.

This is an action at law to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Alfred Smith while riding as a passenger in an automobile as a result of a collision between the automobile and a gas electric car operated by the C., B. & Q. Railroad company. The railroad company filed a demurrer which was sustained by the lower court. Alfred Smith has appealed. The same legal propositions are involved in this ease as in the case of Ella Mae Smith v. Chicago, B. & Q. Railroad company in which an opinion was filed at this term of court, and will be found in 227 Iowa 1404, 291 N. W. 417. That opinion decided this case.

It necessarily follows that the judgment of the lower court is reversed in part and affirmed in part. — Reversed in part; affirmed in part.

Hamilton, C. J., and Miller, Sager, Stigbr, and Oliver, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WYDELL M. BRONSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 236 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
DAMIAN DESHANN HOGAN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2932

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 5, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE

, KELSEY

, and WINOKUR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 360 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 360

  To control emergency spending by limiting such spending to natural 
                               disasters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 1999

   Mr. Grams introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To control emergency spending by limiting such spending to natural 
                               disasters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Spending Control Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. PRESIDENT'S BUDGET.

    Section 1105(b) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(33) a separate appropriation account for appropriations 
        for emergency spending for emergency requirements (as defined 
        in section 250(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
        Control Act of 1985) that equals the annual average of 
        emergency spending for emergency requirements in the 5 fiscal 
        years preceding the budget year.''.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION OF EMERGENCY SPENDING TO NATURAL DISASTERS.

    Section 250(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900(c)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(20) The term `emergency requirement' means 
        appropriations or spending for a natural disaster declared by 
        the President.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall apply to fiscal 
years beginning with fiscal year 2001.
                                 <all>
```
April 16, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the1 6th day of April, 2015.

10-14-00353-CV	IN THE INTEREST OF W.B. AND O.C.B., CHILDREN - ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF BOSQUE COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. CV13164 – REVERSED AND REMANDED - Memorandum Opinion by Davis:

““This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that a new trial as to only Appellant O.S. should be held in accordance with the parties’ agreement, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the trial court’s October 31, 2014 termination order terminating only Appellant O.S.’s parental rights to the children W.B. and O.C.B. be reversed; that the remaining portion of the order of termination of the court below as to the termination of C.B.’s rights to the children W.B. and O.C.B. be, and hereby is, left undisturbed and in full force and effect; and that this cause be remanded to the court below for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s opinion and the parties’ agreement.  It is further ordered that costs are taxed against the party incurring same, and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
---

---

Exhibit 10.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
B.V.R Systems (1998) Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-125879) on Form S-8 of B.V.R Systems
(1998)Ltd. (the Company) of our report dated March 30, 2006, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2005
and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity
(deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December
31, 2005, which report appears in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2005.

|/s/ Somekh Chaikin
Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
Member firm of KPMG International
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 30, 2006



---

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
127799 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 127799 COA: 255486 Wayne CC: 99-006318 GREGORY J. PURIFOY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 16, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-16356

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 9:16-cv-81251-RLR

CONRAD SCARRY, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

 versus

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 

 Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(October 3, 2017)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 16-16356 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Conrad Scarry appeals the District Court’s order dismissing his initial 

complaint for failing to state a claim for relief and its order denying for futility his

motion for leave to amend the complaint. The initial complaint alleged that Wells 

Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) did not adequately respond to Korte & 

Wortman’s request for information under 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(d)(2)(i)(A) because 

it failed to provide the telephone number of the entity that owns Scarry’s loan. The 

proposed amended complaint repeated this claim and added that Wells Fargo also 

violated 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(d)(2)(i)(B) by not adequately responding to Scarry’s

request for information related to loss-mitigation efforts and invoices related to 

property inspections, violated 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(d)(1)(i) by failing to investigate 

the missing phone number, and violated 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(f)(2) by failing to 

send a notification of noncompliance.

Loan servicers are not required to provide a loan owner’s telephone number

under 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(d)(2)(i)(A). Mejia v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, —

F. App’x —, 2017 WL 3396563 (11th Cir. Aug. 8, 2017). Nor must they furnish 

information unrelated to “servicing,” like the loss-mitigation and propertyinspection information requested here. See Hudgins v. Seterus, Inc., 192 F. Supp. 

3d 1343, 1347–53 (S.D. Fla. 2016). Accordingly, Wells Fargo had no duty to

investigate the information’s absence or send a noncompliance notification. 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-16356 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

                    Section 30.18 of the Department of Health and Human Services' claims collection regulations (45 CFR part 30) provides that the Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest, which is determined and fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury after considering private consumer rates of interest on the date that the Department of Health and Human Services becomes entitled to recovery. The rate cannot be lower than the Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable rate determined from the “Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with Range of Maturities” unless the Secretary waives interest in whole or part, or a different rate is prescribed by statute, contract, or repayment agreement. The Secretary of the Treasury may revise this rate quarterly. The Department of Health and Human Services publishes this rate in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

                    The current rate of 12                    3/8                    %, as fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury, is certified for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. This rate is based on the Interest Rates for Specific Legislation, “National Health Services Corps Scholarship Program (42 U.S.C. 254o(b)(1)(A))” and “National Research Service Award Program (42 U.S.C. 288(c)(4)(B)).” This interest rate will be applied to overdue debt until the Department of Health and Human Services publishes a revision.                

David C. Horn,

Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.

[FR Doc. 2024-24510 Filed 10-22-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-04-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 460 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 460

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1999

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan 
  Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the ``Robert K. Rodibaugh United 
                    States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT K. RODIBAUGH UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY 
              COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan Street 
in South Bend, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert 
K. Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert K. 
Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate March 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 410

To provide for offsetting tax cuts whenever there is an elimination of a

discretionary spending program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire,

Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. KYL, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

SESSIONS, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. SANTORUM, and Mr.

HAGEL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees on

the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one committee reports, the other committee has thirty days to report or be discharged

A BILL

To provide for offsetting tax cuts whenever there is an

elimination of a discretionary spending program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Economic Growth and

5 Government Efficiency Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 410 RIS

1 SEC. 2. PROGRAM ELIMINATION EQUALS TAX CUT.

2 Section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency

3 Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 902) is amended

4 by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(f) EFFECT OF PROGRAM ELIMINATION.—

6 ‘‘(1) ESTIMATE.—OMB shall for any program

7 funded by discretionary appropriations that is re8 pealed by law in the fiscal year preceding the budget

9 year determine—

10 ‘‘(A) the amount appropriated for the pro11 gram in last fiscal year the program was fund12 ed; and

13 ‘‘(B) based on the amount determined

14 under subparagraph (A) the dollar equivalent of

15 that amount adjusted for inflation in fiscal

16 years beginning with the budget year through

17 fiscal year 2002.

18 ‘‘(2) INCLUSION IN SCORECARD.—OMB shall

19 include the amounts determined pursuant to para20 graph (1)(B) as a deficit decreases for each of the

21 corresponding fiscal years under this part in the es22 timates and reports required by section 254 unless

23 such amounts are offset by legislation enacted in

24 compliance with paragraph (3).

25 ‘‘(3) USE OF ADJUSTMENT.—Amounts not to

26 exceed the amounts of deficit decrease determined
3

•S 410 RIS

1 under paragraph (2) may only be offset by legisla2 tion decreasing revenues under this section.

3 ‘‘(4) DISCRETIONARY CAPS.—OMB shall reduce

4 the discretionary caps by amounts equal to the

5 amounts included as deficit decreases under para6 graph (2).’’.

7 SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET PROCESS.

8 Section 314 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974

9 is amended by adding at the end the following:

10 ‘‘(f) PROGRAM ELIMINATION.—Revenue decreases

11 offset as provided in section 252(f)(3) of the Balanced

12 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 shall

13 not be treated as increasing the deficit for purposes of this

14 Act.’’.

Æ