alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
Exhibit 11.1

SPECTRIAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
(In thousands except per share data)


<CAPTION>
                                                     Three months ended               Six months ended
                                                         September 28,                  September 28,
                                                ------------------------------    --------------------------
                                                     1997             1996           1997           1996
                                                ----------------  ------------    --------------  ----------
<S>                                                <C>            <C>              <C>            <C>
Net income (loss)                                  $ 6,312        $   (336)        $12,706        $(5,650)
                                                   =======        ========         =======        =======

Weighted average number of shares:
Primary:
   Common stock                                      9,502           8,147           8,901          8,093
   Common stock equivalents - stock options          1,101             n/a*            859            n/a*
                                                   -------        --------         -------        -------
             Total primary shares                   10,603           8,147           9,760          8,093
                                                   =======        ========         =======        =======
Fully diluted:
   Common stock                                      9,502           8,147           8,901          8,093
   Common stock equivalents - stock options          1,242             n/a*          1,165            n/a*
                                                   -------        --------         -------        -------
             Total fully diluted shares             10,744           8,147          10,067          8,093
                                                   =======        ========         =======        =======


Net income (loss) per share - primary              $  0.60        $  (0.04)        $  1.30        $ (0.70)
                                                   =======        ========         =======        =======

Net income (loss) per share - fully diluted        $  0.59        $  (0.04)        $  1.26        $ (0.70)
                                                   =======        ========         =======        =======
<FN>
*    Due to the  loss  in  this  period,  stock  options  outstanding  would  be
     antidilutive and are therefore not included in the calculation.
</FN>
</TABLE>


                                                                 21
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 311

To authorize the Disabled Veterans’ LIFE Memorial Foundation to establish

a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26, 1999

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CLELAND, and Mr. KERREY)

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Disabled Veterans’ LIFE Memorial Foundation to establish a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Disabled Veterans’ LIFE

5 Memorial Foundation is authorized to establish a memo6 rial on Federal land in the District of Columbia or its envi7 rons to honor disabled American veterans who have served

8 in the Armed Forces of the United States.
2

•S 311 IS

1 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO2 RATIVE WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial au3 thorized by subsection (a) shall be in accordance with the

4 Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide standards for placement

5 of commemorative works on certain Federal lands in the

6 District of Columbia and its environs, and for other pur7 poses’’, approved November 14, 1986 (40 U.S.C. 1001 et

8 seq.).

9 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.

10 The Disabled Veterans’ LIFE Memorial Foundation

11 shall be solely responsible for acceptance of contributions

12 for, and payment of the expenses of, the establishment of

13 the memorial authorized by section 1(a). No Federal funds

14 may be used to pay any expense of the establishment of

15 the memorial.

16 SEC. 3. DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.

17 If, upon payment of all expenses of the establishment

18 of the memorial authorized by section 1(a) (including the

19 maintenance and preservation amount provided for in sec20 tion 8(b) of the Act referred to in section 1(b)), or upon

21 expiration of the authority for the memorial under section

22 10(b) of such Act, there remains a balance of funds re23 ceived for the establishment of the memorial, the Disabled

24 Veterans’ LIFE Memorial Foundation shall transmit the

25 amount of the balance to the Secretary of the Treasury
3

•S 311 IS

1 for deposit in the account provided for in section 8(b)(1)

2 of such Act.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into this 26th day of August, 2014, by and between EnLink Midstream GP, LLC (formerly known as Crosstex Energy GP, LLC) (“Company”) and Michael J. Garberding (“Employee”).

 

WHEREAS, Company and Employee have entered into an Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) dated February 27, 2012;

 

WHEREAS, Company and Employee entered into a First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated February 25, 2014 to amend the Agreement to extend the expiration date of the Agreement from February 28, 2014 to August 31, 2014;

 

WHEREAS, Company and Employee now wish to amend the Agreement to extend the expiration date of the Agreement from August 31, 2014 to October 31, 2014, as provided below.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and in the Agreement, Company and Employee agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1.                                      Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

2.                                      Section 4.1(a) of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“Subject to Section 4.1(b) and Section 4.1(c), the term of this Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date, and shall continue for a period of thirty two (32) months.”

 

3.                                      This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Company and Employee and their respective successors or permitted assigns.  In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Amendment, and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control.

 

4.                                      Except as provided herein, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[Signature page follows]

 

1











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to Employment Agreement to be duly executed, and Employee has hereunto set his hand, as of the day and year set forth above.

 

	
 
    	
ENLINK   MIDSTREAM GP, LLC
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Barry E. Davis
    
	
 
    	
Name: 
    	
Barry E. Davis
    
	
 
    	
Title: 
    	
President and Chief Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
EMPLOYEE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Michael J. Garberding
    
	
 
    	
Name: Michael J. Garberding
    


 

2
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of clickNsettle.com, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-QSB”), I,
      Roy Israel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that;





The
      Form
      10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





The
      information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                    May 10, 2007/s/
                      Roy IsraelRoy
                        Israel - Chairman of the Board, CEO and
                        President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-1-2000             APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                          27,632                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,768                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,388                       0
<PP&E>                                           7,052                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,630                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,936                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           323                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,912                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,630                       0
<SALES>                                          7,628                   6,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,385                  13,984
<CGS>                                            1,516                   1,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,078                   2,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,528                   2,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (403)                   (340)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,602)                   1,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,160)                     575
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,442)                     740
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,442                     740
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.57)                    0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)                    0.05


</TABLE>
#### Schneider, Appellant, vs. Journal-Times Company, Respondent.

*September 10*

October *16, 1945.*

*392
      *Val. W. Dittmann*of Kenosha, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Simmons, Walker, Wratten & Sporer*of Racine, and oral argument by *Harold J. Sporer.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

The complaint in this action in all material particulars is substantially the same as the complaint in the case of *Schneider v. Kenosha News Publishing Co., ante,*p. 382, 20 N. W. (2d) 568. The plaintiff demurred to the fourth and fifth paragraphs of the answer and also to the second sentence of paragraph 2 of the answer.

The fourth and fifth paragraphs are substantially the same as paragraphs 3 and 4 of the answer of the Kenosha News Publishing Company. What was said in that case applifes in this case with equal force, so far as these defenses are concerned.

The demurrer to the second sentence of paragraph 2 was likewise properly overruled. Sec. 263.17, Stats., provides that the plaintiff may demur to any alleged defense in the answer. It does not authorize a demurrer to a sentence taken out of its context in an affirmative defense.

*By the Court.*— The order overruling the demurrer is affirmed.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

Keith A. Anderson, Acting Director 

District Department of the Environment 

Department of the Environment Air Quality Dhision 

1200 1st St., NE, 5thFloor 

Washington, D.C. 20002 

Dear Mr. Anderson: 

MAY 0 3 2013 

On April 15, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the District of Columbia's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by your department on 

AprilS, 2013, pertaining to amendments to Chapters 1 and 2 of Title 20 (Environment) ofthe 

District of Columbia Municipal Regulations (DCMR). EPA has determined that the submittal is 

administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking action. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Paul Wentworth, 

Office of Permits and Air Toxics, at (215) 814-2183. He is the principal contact for this 

rulemaking. 

cc: Ms. Cecily Beall, DDOE 

Ms. Lauren Maxwell, DDOE 

Sincerely, 

])

Diana 

l~~Q Esher, Director ~ 

Air Protection Division 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
#### Rasmussen, Appellant, vs. Jensen, Administrator, and another, Respondents.

*March 9*

April *7, 1942.*

*253The cause was submitted for the appellant on the briefs of *Robert M. Rasmussen*of Kenosha, and for the respondents on the brief of Cavanagh, *Stephenson & Mittelstaed*of Ke-nosha.

Feitz, J.

As this action is brought to recover judgment against the same defendants upon virtually the same alleged factual basis for an amount to be paid to Lillian Rasmussen, which she seeks as plaintiff to recover from the same defendants in the companion case, above mentioned, and as the facts alleged in her complaint are insufficient to state a cause of action, they are likewise insufficient to state a cause of action in this case. Moreover, there are no facts alleged to show that Robert A. Rasmussen would be entitled to any relief herein even if there had been sufficient facts stated otherwise to constitute a cause of action in favor of Lillian Rasmussen. She had the status and rights of a creditor of the estate of the deceased, Matt A. Rasmussen, but the plaintiff, Robert M. Rasmussen, as the indorser or comaker of the note and a party against whom judgment thereon was also entered, but who had not made ány payment thereon or acquired any interest *254therein, has no right whatever as such comaker-, indorser, or joint judgment debtor against the estate of Matt A. Rasmussen or the administrator thereof by reason of which the plaintiff can be held to have been damaged by Jensen’s acts or conduct as administrator.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 1278 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 223 - AD
CLYDE BAILEY P.C.
                            Certified Public Accountant
                               10924 Vance Jackson #404
                               San Antonio, Texas 78230
                                   (210) 699-1287 (ofc)
                 (888) 699-1287 -- (210) 691-2911 (fax)





March 30, 2003





Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.  20549




RE:  BUSANDA EXPLORATIONS INC.
     Registration Statement on Form 10-KSB


I consent to the use of my report, dated February 18, 2003, in the
Company's Form 10-KSB annual report filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Sincerely,

/s/ Clyde Bailey, CPA
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume, certify that

1.  I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of clickNsettle.com,
Inc. (the "registrant");

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement  of
a  material  fact  or omit  to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's  third fiscal quarter
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the  design or  operation  of
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which  are  reasonably  likely to
adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and
report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  May 12, 2005

/s/ Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume - Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer


                                       25
September 21, 2009

Subject: Teleconference with Portland Cement Association to D iscuss THC Emissions

D ata Gathering Location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park, NC Date: September 21, 2009 Participants:
Portland Cement Association (PCA ) Andy O’ Hare, PCA Hector Ybanez, Holcim Curtis L eslie, Ash Grove Mike Pelan, Lafarge Tom Rader , Buzzi Tim Matz, Lehigh Jay Grady , Cal Portland Cement Nancy Garnett, TXI John Holmes (consultant to PCA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Keith Barnett Peter Tsirigotis

The purpose of this call was to continue discussion between the EPA and the PCA on the THC data gathering effort test plan dated September 15, 2009. The THC test plan design dated September 15, 2009 , has been docketed separatel y

.
SHARE

# Oak Ridge Hotels

Contact information for local hotels is listed below.

### At ORNL

### In Oak Ridge
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-993

Lower Tribunal No. 21-CA-001027

_____________________________

SFR SERVICES, LLC a/a/o JAMES ELKIN and SANDRA ELKIN,

Appellant, 

v.

EDISON INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

Keith R. Kyle, Judge.

March 19, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, SMITH and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Erin M. Berger and Melissa A. Giasi, of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Diane H. Tutt, of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
# Iris Oifigiúil C NaN/2016

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | Eagrán Speisialta (
  1
  ) |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 5918 Bealtaine 2016 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

Eagrán Speisialta (
  1
  )

1

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

5918 Bealtaine 2016

---

| | Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Ceartúchán |
| 2016/C 178/01 | Ceartúchán ar Sheasamh (AE) Uimh. 1/2016 ón gComhairle ar an gcéad léamh chun go nglacfar Rialachán ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle maidir le Gníomhaireacht Iarnróid an Aontais Eorpaigh agus lena n-aisghairtear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 881/2004 — a ghlac an Chomhairle an 10 Nollaig 2015( IO C 56, 12.2.2016 ) | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

Ceartúchán

2016/C 178/01

Ceartúchán ar Sheasamh (AE) Uimh. 1/2016 ón gComhairle ar an gcéad léamh chun go nglacfar Rialachán ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle maidir le Gníomhaireacht Iarnróid an Aontais Eorpaigh agus lena n-aisghairtear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 881/2004 — a ghlac an Chomhairle an 10 Nollaig 2015( IO C 56, 12.2.2016 )

( IO C 56, 12.2.2016 )

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Faoin tagairt C 178 a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(1)   Faoin tagairt C 178 a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

Ceartúchán

| 18.5.2016 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | 1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2016

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

1

---

Ceartúchán ar Sheasamh (AE) Uimh. 1/2016 ón gComhairle ar an gcéad léamh chun go nglacfar Rialachán ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle maidir le Gníomhaireacht Iarnróid an Aontais Eorpaigh agus lena n-aisghairtear Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 881/2004 — a ghlac an Chomhairle an 10 Nollaig 2015

(
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 56 Eagrán Speisialta Gaeilge an 12 Feabhra 2016
  )

(2016/C 178/01)

Leathanach 39, Airteagal 65, mír 10:

in ionad:

“10.   Tabharfaidh Parlaimint na hEorpa, ar mholadh ón gComhairle ag gníomhú di trí thromlach cáilithe, urscaoileadh don Stiúrthóir Feidhmiúcháin roimh an 30 Aibreán den bhliain N + 2 i leith chur chun feidhme an bhuiséid i gcomhair na bliana N.”,

léitear:

“10.   Tabharfaidh Parlaimint na hEorpa, ar mholadh ón gComhairle ag gníomhú di trí thromlach cáilithe, urscaoileadh don Stiúrthóir Feidhmiúcháin roimh an 15 Bealtaine den bhliain N + 2 i leith chur chun feidhme an bhuiséid i gcomhair na bliana N.”.

---