alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MICHAEL TILGHMAN Adm’r, &c. *vs.*KINION T. WEST *&*AL.

Where the real owners were present at a sale of slaves, sold as the property of another, hut were ignorant of their title, they are not chargeable with fraud in not forbidding the sale, and will not be enjoined from asserting at law their title, of which they were subsequently informed.

Fraud cannot exist, as a matter of fact, where the intent to deceive does not exist, for it is emphatically the action of the mind, which gives it existence.

Appeal from an interlocutory decree, dissolving an in*184junction, made at the Fall Term, 1851, of Lenoir Court of Equity, his Honor Judge Dick presiding.

The facts relied upon in this case, are the same as those in the case at law between the same parties, reported 9 lied. 163.

*J. W. Bryan*for the plaintiff.

*J. H. Bryan,*for the defendant.

Nash, J.

At the December Term, 1848, the case of *West*v *Tilghman*was decided, 9 Ire. Rep. 163. That was an action at law, brought to recover the boy Reuben, and under the same state of facts as exist here. The Court then decided, that tile legal title to the negro was not lost by the plaintiff’s being present at the sale, and not forbidding it. Upon the granting of the *venire de novo,*in that case, the then defendant, Tilghman, filed this bill for an injunction, to restrain the plaintiffs at law from proceeding in their action. The injunction was granted ; and, upon the coming in of the answers, on argument, it was dissolved and an appeal taken to this Court. The facts, upon which the plaintiff' rests his claim to the relief he asks, are, that the defendants were present, both at the hiring the slaves, Reuben and Sylva, and also at the sale of them ; and they fraudulently concealed their title. This fraudulent concealment is the *gravamen*of the plaintiff’s complaint. The title to the slaves was in the present defendants, at the time of the sale, by virtue of the fight of their wives ; but they both positively deny, that they had any knowledge of the fact at the time. And the plaintiff has entirely failed to sustain the allegationof fraud. The silence of the defendants, at the time of the sale, is fully explained by their ignorance of the fact of title. Fraud cannot exist, as a matter of fact, where the intent to deceive does not exist: for it is ernphat-*185ically the action of the mind which gives it existence. But the absence of all fraudulent intention is incontrovertibly shown by the fact, that Kilpatrick, one of the defendants,, purchased Sylva, one of the slaves,

The case is not before us on the hearing, but on the interlocutory order dissolving the injunction. We see no error in the decision of his Honor below.

This opinion will be certified to the Court of Equity for Lenoir County.

Peii Cujuam. Ordered to be certified accordingly.
Exhibit 10.8

                              CONSULTING AGREEMENT

      This Consulting Agreement is between The New Algae Company, dba Cell Tech,
an Oregon corporation ("Cell Tech") and Dr. Don Anderson ("Consultant").

      In consideration of the promises below, the parties agree as follows:

      1. Commencing on the date of this Agreement, Consultant agrees to provide
Cell Tech with consulting services which shall, from time to time, be defined by
Cell Tech.

      2. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, Consultant shall provide the
Company with services on two working days per month, for eight hours per day,
during the term of this Agreement.

      3. For services rendered under this Agreement, Cell Tech shall pay
Consultant the sum of $125 per hour payable within thirty (30) days after the
date the services are rendered.

      4. It is expressly understood that Consultant is an independent contractor
and not an employee of Cell Tech. Consultant may render services to other
clients and is unrestricted in doing so by this Agreement.

      5. It is expressly understood that Consultant has an affirmative duty of
nondisclosure concerning any facet of Cell Tech's business and the services
provided by Consultant under this Agreement. Such information shall not be
divulged to any persons whomsoever except authorized employees of Cell Tech. In
particular, but not so as to limit the foregoing, Consultant shall not divulge
information of any sort to Cell Tech's product distributors or competitors.
Since the information to be disclosed to Consultant under this Agreement is
highly confidential, any breach of this duty shall result in substantial
pecuniary loss for Cell Tech and Cell Tech shall have a claim for damages
incurred as a result.

      6. Each party shall be responsible for the actions of its respective
agents, employees or assigns. Cell Tech shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless Consultant from any claims or liabilities which may arise from services
performed under this Agreement with the exception of claims arising due to the
fault or negligence of Consultant.

      7. Each party shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement without cause
effective 10 days following written notice to the other at the other's last
known address.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of March
1, 1996.

                                            CELL TECH

                                            By:   Marta C. Kollman

                                            Dr. Don Anderson


                                       66
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      August 11, 2009 | /s/ Antonio Rotundo                             |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Antonio      Rotundo, President, CEO, CFO and a |
|                        | Director                                        |
|                        | (Principal      Financial Officer)              |

----
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 20 15 - 4381 Directorate ID : 2015 - SW - 009 - AD Helicopter Model: Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 23 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent the failure of the external life raft to deploy , possibly prevent ing the evacuation of passengers during an emergency . Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 50 Labor per Helicopter ( 4 work hours X $85 for inspection) $ 340
Other (Explain) TotalCo stperHelicopter $390 Total US Fleet Cost $8,970 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : David Hatfield
# L_2011195EN.01003201.xml

| 27.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 195/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 195/32

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 733/2011

of 22 July 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 299, 5.11.2010, p. 7.

2

---

ANNEX

Foodstuffs listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 510/2006:

Class 2.4.   Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares

POLAND

Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski (PGI)

---
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2998

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2000

Referred to the Committee on International Relations

AN ACT

To designate a fellowship program of the Peace Corps promoting the work of returning Peace Corps volunteers

in underserved American communities as the ‘‘Paul D.

Coverdell Fellows Program’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Paul D. Coverdell Fel5 lows Program Act of 2000’’.
2

S 2998 RFH

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

2 Congress makes the following findings:

3 (1) Paul D. Coverdell was elected to the George

4 State Senate in 1970 and later became Minority

5 Leader of the Georgia State Senate, a post he held

6 for 15 years.

7 (2) Paul D. Coverdell served with distinction as

8 the 11th Director of the Peace Corps from 1989 to

9 1991, where he promoted a fellowship program that

10 was composed of returning Peace Corps volunteers

11 who agreed to work in underserved American com12 munities while they pursued educational degrees.

13 (3) Paul D. Coverdell served in the United

14 States Senate from the State of Georgia from 1993

15 until his sudden death on July 18, 2000.

16 (4) Senator Paul D. Coverdell was beloved by

17 his colleagues for his civility, bipartisan efforts, and

18 his dedication to public service.

19 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF PAUL D. COVERDELL FELLOWS

20 PROGRAM.

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective on the date of enact22 ment of this Act, the program under section 18 of the

23 Peace Corps Act (22 U.S.C. 2517) referred to before such

24 date as the ‘‘Peace Corps Fellows/USA Program’’ is redes25 ignated as the ‘‘Paul D. Coverdell Fellows Program’’.
3

S 2998 RFH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference before the date of

2 enactment of this Act in any law, regulation, order, docu3 ment, record, or other paper of the United States to the

4 Peace Corps Fellows/USA Program shall, on and after

5 such date, be considered to refer to the Paul D. Coverdell

6 Fellows Program.

Passed the Senate July 27, 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-171096) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-171096) and Amendment No. 290 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
















Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 22, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4828-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-4828-DR), dated September 28, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued October 13, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 28, 2024.

Baker and Putnam Counties for Public Assistance, including direct federal assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

Nassau County for Public Assistance, including direct federal assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-24676 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 471 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 471

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the 60-month 
               limit on student loan interest deductions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 1999

 Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Jeffords, Ms. Collins, Mr. 
Cochran, and Mr. Abraham) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the 60-month 
               limit on student loan interest deductions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF 60-MONTH LIMIT ON STUDENT LOAN INTEREST 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to interest on education loans) is amended by striking 
subsection (d) and by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as 
subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 6050(e) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``section 221(e)(1)'' and inserting 
``section 221(d)(1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to any loan interest paid after December 31, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3622-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-3622-EM), dated October 7, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued October 7, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of October 7, 2024.

Alachua, Baker, Bradford, Clay, Columbia, Duval, Gilchrist, Hamilton, Lafayette, Madison, Nassau, Suwannee, Taylor, and Union Counties for emergency protective measures [Category B], including direct federal assistance (already designated for emergency protective measures (Category B), limited to direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-24653 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Roy Israel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of clickNsettle.com,
Inc. (the "registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's first fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 11, 2003

/s/ Roy Israel
-----------------------------------------------------
Roy Israel - Chairman of the Board, CEO and President


                                       20