alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                  Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officers of Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:

a.    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
      ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.



                                 /s/ Clark M. Mower
Date:  July 15, 2005            ____________________________________
                                Clark M. Mower
                                Chief Executive Officer


                                 /s/ B. Fred Atkinson
Date:  July 15, 2005            ____________________________________
                                B. Fred Atkinson, Jr.
                                Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2

       Certification of Chief Financial Officer of clickNsettle.com, Inc.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
(the "Form 10-QSB") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of
clickNsettle.com, Inc. (the "Issuer").

I, Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer, certify
that:

      (iii) the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (iv)  the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.



Dated:  November 12, 2002


                                        /s/ Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume - Vice
                                        President, Chief Financial Officer
                                        and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,482
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,138
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,445
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      6,659
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,536
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            14,385
<LOANS>                                        252,984
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,690
<DEPOSITS>                                     260,469
<SHORT-TERM>                                    13,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,851
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,808
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 306,690
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,746
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,687
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   948
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                21,381
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,036
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,436
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,946
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,667
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,078)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (1,078)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (691)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.42
<LOANS-NON>                                        473
<LOANS-PAST>                                       270
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,500
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,526
<RECOVERIES>                                        45
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,686
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,686
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Honorable H. A. Jemlaon, Commlesloner State Department of Banking Auatin, Texas Attention: Mr. I.. S. Johnson,

Deputy Commiaaloner Dear Sir:

his date been

or.~theJJexlco Nat&ml Bvk, oommonly known as Btinoo’NNfon$l of bf8&&?6City, the branch being located in Juwez kiexlco. The operation has to do uith th&ahe&g of American money into Msxlcan specie end mrrency and is reported to us by Mr. Potts tc*be axerolaed in the following manner.

*. ..I i ROurr&tlj’there are nuxbera of k!exlcan laborera belA&spcturned to Mexico by train and it is reported by Ifr, Potts that the operations of this bank, throu&h its representatives, lnolude the posting of sigma ln the various cars in which these ::sxlosn laborers are being transported, giving the Aaae of t?e bank and other lnformatlon in oomeotion with the changing of money in the MexioaA 1anCuage. ilr. Potts also reports that repreeentativea of the bank advertise themaelvee as suchSmorable !1, A. Jamleon, Page 2

to the ssld Mexican laborera and he terms this 3s being u&air oompetitlon, upon the @OUAda that the Bank of Wexloo has noright to perform this function without the OOnflnes Of their own territory or partloularlp ln our State. We are enoloslng the letter of protert nhloh wemantloned above together with a letter OfOertlflOatl~ 

### over the signature OfiToeC. Zollinarp, City Lloenea Colleotor of the City or 21 Paso, Texas, oertliylng that the above XAtiOAed bank hae besn granted a City OoouDation Lioenee by the Llcenar Bureau of the iXty of %1Paso, Texas. *Weseek to determine from your offloa whether or not it 1s our responsiblllty to investigate or take anp aotlan iA reepsot to this letter of protest and request or Mr. Totts andwill appreolate your renderlAg a~ opinion 

### in this 

### regard.” Theaotlvitlse of the branoh bankwith reaprot to exobange oarrled on IAthis state donot present anyquestian calling ror aotlon or eny oharaoter upon the part of your department.Ii the lnrormatlon contained IAyour letter preeents aquestion for anydepartment oi this atate, It Is the Attorney General’s Department. WethaAk.you 

### ror your thoughtrulAeaa IA bringing this to 

### our attention, andweshall avail ourselves 0r the IArormatlan which It oontaine IA the event wedetermine that suoh taots oall 

### for our aotlOA. Yours very truly AT’l’ORNEY~~N?3R& OFTiZ%S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEEC, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      19,709,963
<SECURITIES>                                 4,801,534
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,233,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (100,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,036,231
<PP&E>                                       1,871,343
<DEPRECIATION>                               (776,285)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,095,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,045,134
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,092
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,987,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,095,375
<SALES>                                        491,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,074,927
<CGS>                                           28,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  445,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,379,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                16,867
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,408,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,408,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,408,481)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual Report of Loudeye Corp.  (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jerold J. Goade, Jr.,
Senior Vice President of Finance of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the date of the financial statements contained therein.




-----------------------------------------
Jerold J. Goade, Jr.
Senior Vice President of Finance
March 19, 2004






                                       86
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84918-84919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4781-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Texas; Amendment No. 18 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas (FEMA-4781-DR), dated May 17, 2024, and related 
determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 23, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following area 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
May 17, 2024.

    Hays County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
emergency protective measures (Category B), limited to direct 
federal assistance under the Public Assistance program).


[[Page 84919]]


    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24656 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Summary of Phone Conversations with the San Diego Air Pollution Control District 

Prepared by Nicole Law

April 24, 2013

Phone conversation between Nicole Law (EPA) and Natalie Yates (SDAPCD) on April 9, 2011. 

Nicole asked Natalie about the averaging provision in the rule. Natalie confirmed the averaging 

provision is no longer in use. She also confirmed the annual reporting in the rule ended when the 

averaging provision ended. Natalie explained the district has drafted a new rule based on CARB’s 

2007 SCM and will have a workshop in about a month.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 444 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 444

To deem the application submitted by the Dodson Public Schools District 
   for Impact Aid payments for fiscal year 1998 as timely submitted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 23, 1999

 Mr. Baucus (for himself and Mr. Burns) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To deem the application submitted by the Dodson Public Schools District 
   for Impact Aid payments for fiscal year 1998 as timely submitted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPACT AID.

    The Secretary of Education shall deem the application received by 
the Department of Education from the Dodson Public Schools District No. 
2-A, Dodson, Montana, for payments under title VIII of the Elementary 
and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.) for fiscal 
year 1998, as timely submitted in accordance with the requirements of 
such title.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO NOTE

This First Amendment to the 10% Secured Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of this 30th day of September, 2009 by and between Richard Parrillo (the "Payee"), and Hudson Technologies, Inc. (the "Maker"), and Hudson Technologies Company ("Company").

WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, on or about March 26, 2009, the Maker borrowed the sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) from the Payee and executed and delivered to the Payee a 10% Secured Subordinated Promissory Note (the "Note") in the sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) dated March 26, 2009 to be paid on September 30, 2009 (the "Maturity Date"); and

WHEREAS, as security for the obligations of the Maker, Company executed a General Security Agreement, dated March 26, 2009; and

WHEREAS, the Payee and the Maker have agreed to extend the Maturity Date under the Note for an additional nine (9) months from October 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. The Maturity Date under the Note is hereby extended to June 30, 2010 at which time the entire principal balance due on the Note plus any unpaid but accrued interest and any fees and costs due the Payee shall be due and payable.

2. Except and to the extent modified hereby, the Note shall remain in full force and effect, without modification or change.

3. Payee, Maker and Company hereby confirm and agree that the General Security Agreement shall continue to apply and shall remain in full force and effect until all sums due or to become due to the Payee under the Note, including, without limitation, the principal, all accrued interest thereon, penalties, costs, fees and late charges, if any, shall be indefeasibly paid by Maker to the Payee.

4. This Amendment may not be modified or terminated orally and shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors and assigns of the Payee and Maker.

5. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

6. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above.







|                     |  |     | Hudson Technologies, Inc.  
|-------------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------
|/s/ Richard Parrillo |  | By: | /s/ Brian F. Coleman       
|Richard Parrillo     |  |     |                            
|                     |  |     | Hudson Technologies Company
|                     |  | By: | /s/ Brian F. Coleman
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08 - 50457

ROBROY INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

JOSEPH SCHWALBACH AND CL SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

Western District of Texas Midland Division

No. 7:06-cv-00040-RAJ

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The District Court had jurisdiction to enter the order granting a new trial.

Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed because of the absence of a final,

appealable order.

DISMISSED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 7, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
GREGORY BUTLER,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0704

Opinion filed March 1, 2016.

Amended Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Gregory Butler, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking belated appeal is denied on the merits.

THOMAS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### P. D. B. ARRINGTON v. J. P. ARRINGTON et als.

*Practice*— Notice *of Appeal*— Time *of Service.*

1. Where appellant’s counsel, five days after the adjournment of "Court, mailed by registered letter notice of appeal, statement of case, and copies and fees to the Sheriff of the county at the oountv-seat, so as to leave ample time for service on appellee's counsel, rvho resided at that place, the failure of the Sheriff to take the notice, etc., from the post-office until after the ten days allowed for service cannot be imputed to the appellant as his laches.

*2.*In such case, where the facts are not disputed, the case will bo remanded and the appellee will be allowed five clays after the certificate of this Court is filed in the Court below' to file exceptions to the appellant’s case on appeal *nunc pro*tunc, and in default of an agreement the Judge who tried the cause-will settle the case.

MotioN to dismiss the appeal of the defendant Nancy Bunn from a judgment rendered in an action tried before *Shuford, J.,*at Fall Term, 1893, of Vaxce Superior Court.

*Messrs. Battle*& *Mordecai,*for appellant.

*Mr. R. B. Peebles, contra.*

Clark, J.:

The judgment was rendered at a term of Court which adjourned .June 3, 1893. On June 8, 1893, counsel for appellant, Nancy Bunn, caused notice of appeal to be entered, and mailed from Iiocky Mount, by registered letter, notice of appeal and statement- of case on appeal, *114with copies and fees for service, to the Sheriff of Northampton county, at Jackson, the county-seat. The appellees’ counsel resided in that town and there was ample time to have served the papers before the expiration of the ten days, “which, excluding the first day and including the last” *{The Code,*§596), would have expired 13th June at midnight. The ten days is to be computed not from the day judgment was rendered, but from June 3, the cla)*- on which Court actually adjourned. *Turrentine*v. *Railroad,*92 N. C., 642 ; *Walker*v. *Scott,*104 N. C., 481; *Chamblee*v. *Baker,*95 N. C., 98; *Worthy*v. *Brady,*91 N. C., 265. The appellant was guilty of no laches. The letter was properly addressed to the Sheriff at the county-seat. *Yeargin*v. *Wood,*84 N. C., 326. It was not the neglect of appellant that the Sheriff to whom the letter was addressed did not take it out of the office till June 17th.

If the facts were controverted the case might be remanded to the Judge below to find the facts, but being undenied it is clear that no laches is imputable to appellant. The case is remanded to the Superior Court of Vance County. Following the precedent in *Walker*v. *Scott,*104 N. C., 481, the appellees will be allowed five days after the certificate of this opinion is filed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of said county, to file their exceptions, should they desire to do so, to'the appellant’s case on appeal *nunc pro tunc,*and if the parties cannot agree upon a statement of the case it will be settled by his Honor who tried the case (Judge Shuforcl), under the requirements of *The Code,*§550. , Remanded.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1





                    CONSENT OF HUTTON, NELSON & MCDONALD LLP



The Board of Directors
LEXON Technologies, Inc.



      We consent to incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of LEXON Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 18, 2000 except for
Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements as to which the date is March
6, 2000 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of LEXON Technologies, Inc.
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999 and
to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K.


                                          /s/ Hutton, Nelson & McDonald LLP
                                          ---------------------------------
                                            Hutton, Nelson & McDonald LLP





Chicago, Illinois
April 14, 2000