alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3, as amended (SEC File
No. 333-49499-99), and Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-62458) of Great Lakes REIT of our report dated January 22, 2004, (except
for the last paragraph of Note 14, as to which the date is March 2, 2004) with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Great Lakes REIT included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.



Chicago,
Illinois
March 5, 2004

---

QuickLinks
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3285

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude tobacco products

from qualifying foreign trade property in the treatment of extraterritorial

income.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 15 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

tobacco products from qualifying foreign trade property

in the treatment of extraterritorial income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS FROM

4 QUALIFYING FOREIGN TRADE PROPERTY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 943(a)(3) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to excluded property) is

7 amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (D),

8 by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (E) and
2

•S 3285 IS

1 inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by inserting after subparagraph (E)

2 the following new subparagraph:

3 ‘‘(F) any tobacco products (as defined in

4 section 5702(c)).’’.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend7 ment made by section 3(b) of the FSC Repeal and

8 Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
              This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
              from IJNT.net, Inc. June 30, 1999 financial statements and is
              qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
              statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000925739
<NAME> IJNT.net, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             757
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      560
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,577
<PP&E>                                           2,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (734)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              775
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,461
<SALES>                                            925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   925
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,632)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,632)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4830-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Georgia; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4830-DR), dated September 30, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 11, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include permanent work 
under the Public Assistance program for the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared 
a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 30, 
2024.

    Brantley County for Individual Assistance (already designated 
for Public Assistance, including direct Federal assistance).
    Fulton County for Individual Assistance.
    Berrien, Brooks, Bulloch, Candler, Chatham, Colquitt, Cook, 
Emanuel, Evans, Laurens, Liberty, Lowndes, Tattnall, Tift, and 
Toombs Counties for permanent work [Categories C-G] (already 
designated for Individual Assistance and assistance for debris 
removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], 
including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance 
program).
    Bryan, Camden, Charlton, Glynn, and Long Counties for Public 
Assistance, including direct Federal assistance (already designated 
for Individual Assistance).
    Pulaski, Twiggs, Wilcox, and Wilkinson Counties for Public 
Assistance, including direct Federal assistance.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24688 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
FOR PUBLICATION

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT:			ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:

JEFFREY A. MODISETT				MARY M. RUNNELLS	

Attorney General of Indiana				Bloomington, Indiana

MYRA P. SPICKER

Deputy Attorney General

RACHEL ZAFFRANN

Deputy Attorney General

Indianapolis, Indiana	

	IN THE

	COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL		)

RESOURCES,					)

			)

	Appellant-Respondent,	)

			)

		vs.	)	No.  63A05-9708-CV-346

			)

SOLAR SOURCES, INC.,	)

			)

	Appellee-Petitioner.	)

	APPEAL FROM THE PIKE CIRCUIT COURT

	The Honorable Marvin D. Stratton, Judge

	Cause No.  63C01-9602-MI-32

	Handdown dateFebruaryFebruary 11, 1999

	OPINION ON REHEARING - FOR PUBLICATION

RUCKER, Judge

	Solar Sources, Inc. (Solar) and the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) seek rehearing of our opinion cited as Dept. of Natural Resources v. Solar Sources, Inc., 701 N.E.2d 1244 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998).  Although asserting different grounds for their respective petitions, both parties

complain of the opinion’s last sentence which declares “[t]hus Solar was not required to revise its

permits as DNR requested.”  Id. at 1247.  As the parties correctly point out the question of whether Solar was required to revise its permits was not before the trial court, and the trial court did not rule

on the issue.  Indeed the record shows Solar sought administrative review of the order requiring the

company to revise its permits.  However an Administrative Law Judge determined that the review

was time barred.  Solar did not appeal that determination.  Rather, the question before the trial court

concerned whether the DNR properly construed 310 IAC 12-3-43 and 310 IAC 12-5-36.  We

determined that it did not and affirmed the trial court.  Although our decision will likely affect any

future permits Solar may obtain, it has no bearing on Solar’s current permits.  That portion of our

original opinion indicating otherwise is hereby vacated.  As provided herein the parties’ respective

petitions for rehearing are granted.  In all other respects they are denied. 

SHARPNACK, C.J., and DARDEN, J., concur.
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION January 18, 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with PACCAR FROM: Angela Cullen TO: Docket EPA- HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on Thursday, December 2 , 2010 b etween PACCAR and EPA. The attendees included: PACCAR: Margaret Sullivan and Tom Sloane EPA: Cle Jackson, Chuck Moulis , and Angela Cullen The discussion focus ed primarily on vehicle family

definitions .
Exhibit 11
                                         


                               Movie Gallery, Inc.

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  Thirteen weeks ended
                                               April 6             March 31
                                                 1997                 1996
                                             -----------         -----------

<S>                                          <C>                <C>        
Net income                                   $ 1,996,000         $ 5,081,000
                                              ==========          ==========

Shares:
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding                                13,420,791          12,907,032
Net effect of dilutive stock options                  --             197,825
                                              ----------          ----------
Weighted average common and common
   equivalent shares outstanding              13,420,791          13,104,857
                                              ==========          ==========
Net income per common and
   common equivalent share                   $       .15         $       .39
                                              ==========          ==========

</TABLE>



                                       12
#### James R. Baxter, Appellant, v. Wm. C. Pritchard *et al.*

Deeds: surrender of right or redemption by parol. A deed absolute in form, though in fact given as security against future liability on account of the grantor, passes the legal titl8; and the grantor may surrender his right of redemption by pa-rol agreement which will vest the complete titl • in the grantee.

*Appeal from Ida District Court.*— HoN. S. M. Elwood, Judge.

Thursday, February 4, 1904.

The plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the defendant John E. Pritchard. In January, 1897, John E. Pritchard conveyed certain lands by warranty deed to his codefendant, Wm. C. Pritchard. This is a suit in equity ashing that such conveyance be decreed a mortgage only, and that the plaintiff be permitted to redeem therefrom. There was a trial, and a judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals.'

*Affirmed.*

*Chas. 8. Macomber*and *Wm. C. Miller*for appellant.

*Franlc II. Cains, (J. C. Walters and Cains, Kelby & Storey,*of counsel) for appellees.

SherwiN, J.

-At the time this conveyance was made the land was incumbered for all or more than its market value. There were two mortgages on the land, and a judgment against John E. Pritchard which was a lien thereon. The *591deed to Win. 0. Pritcliard was in fact given as security against possible future liability on account of the grantor, but in terms it was an .absolute deed, and vested in the grantee the legal title to the land. *Richards v.*Crawford, 50 Iowa, 496. No other writing was executed by them, and the vendor’s right of redemption, therefore, rested in parol. The evidence is quite conclusive that afterwards, and before the plaintiff obtained his judgment against John *R.*-Pritchard, the latter surrendered to Wm. C. Pritchard his right of redemption and the possession of the land under an agreement whereby the latter assumed the prior incumbrance upon the land and relieved the former from personal liability thereon. This surrender was in parol, it is true, but it has repeatedly been held in this state — and, indeed, it is the general rule— that it may be so made, and that, when so made, the title of the grantee becomes absolute. *Haggerty v.*Brower, 105 Iowa, 395; *Caruthers’ Adm'r v.*Hunt, 18 Iowa; 576; *Vennum v. Babcock,*13 Iowa, 194. There is nothing in the claim thgt the title was held by Wm. C. Pritchard in trust for other creditors. No such issue was made, and there is no evidence tending to prove it. We also think the plea of former adjudication good, but we need not discuss it, inasmuch as we shall affirm the case on its merits.

The judgment is aeeiemed.
SERVED: JULY24, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SCHUMAN AVIATION, LTD. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0778 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

b 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012~130002) has been 

. . assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadiQ.gs and 

other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA . . 

Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attach~d. Service List. 

., 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0778 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Christopher D. Ferrara, Respondent's Counsel 

841 Bishop Street, Suite 1628 

Honolulu, HI 96813 

FAX: 808-537-4576 

President 

Schuman Aviation, Ltd. 

·130 Iolana Place 

Honolulu, HI 96819 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, A WP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-3454 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

T~e Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

·TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

'o 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 fudependence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

a~
MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

RULE 204. CANCELLATION OF APPLICATIONS

(Revised 7

- 17

- 85)

An Authority to Construct shall expire and the application shall be cancelled two (2) years from the date of issuance of the Authority to Construct; provi ded, however, that the Air Pollution Control Officer may extend the time period, in increments of up to 2 years at a time, when it can be demonstrated that the applicant has been and is actively, diligently pursuing the project. Such time extensions cannot exceed seven (7) years from the date the Authority to Construct is first issued

* * * * *
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-15-00902-CR & 01-15-00903-CR

Style: Roel David Gonzalez v. The State of Texas

Date motions filed*: June 20, 2016

Type of motions: Second and Final Motion for Extension of Time to File Briefs

Party filing motions: Appellant’s Counsel

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Briefs

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: April 1, 2016

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due Date: June 20, 2016

Date Requested: July 18, 2016 (101 days from original deadline)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If documents are to be filed, documents due: July 18, 2016.

 No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

On April 8, 2016, the Clerk of this Court granted appellant’s first extension request

which sought 80 days from April 1, 2016 until June 20, 2016, to file his briefs, with no

further extensions to be granted. Because appellant’s second extension motion 

provides extraordinary circumstances explaining the need for a final extension, this 

extension is granted, but counsel is warned that no further extensions will be 

granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 38.6(d). Accordingly, if appellant’s briefs

are not filed by July 18, 2016, the Court will abate this appeal for a late-brief hearing.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2).

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Laura Carter Higley

  

Date: June 23, 2016
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

d0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

146165

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146165

COA: 301683

Washtenaw CC: 04-001767-FC

JASEN ALLEN THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infinicall Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robin Glanzl, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Robin GlanzlPresident
  February 17, 2005
|---------------------------------------------





---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                       CONSENT OF EXPERT SASKATOON MINING

                                CONSENT OF EXPERT
                    SASKATOON MINING & MINERAL SERVICE, LTD.


         Saskatoon Mining & Mineral Service, Ltd. ("S2MS") hereby consents to
the references and disclosures in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of
International Uranium Corporation to S2MS, our report entitled "Acquisition
Study of Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc." dated November 1996 (the "Report"), and all
data from the Report.



                                        Saskatoon Mining & Mineral Service, Ltd.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nine Mile Software, Inc. (the            “Company”) on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March            31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the            “Report”), I,**Damon            Deru**, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,            pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley            Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,            in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the            Company.

 

| /s/ | **DAMONDERU** |
|-----|---------------|

 

**Damon Deru**

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Accounting Officer

June 3, 2008

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or            other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that            appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been            provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing            certifications are accompanying the Company's Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q/A solely            pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of            section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as            part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.