alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          749286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1244100
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (31056)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4069455
<PP&E>                                          801169
<DEPRECIATION>                                (519057)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13430095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6867658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           196
<OTHER-SE>                                     5966159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13430095
<SALES>                                        3291867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3291867
<CGS>                                           786913
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4089475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (48808)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1697163)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     56418
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1753581)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1943040)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
#### Eggert & Flater v. W. A. Snoke, Aug. Reimers, William A. Puetsch, Appellants.

Mechanic’s Lien. Where one accepts a deed stating that it is 1 subject to any claim of certain parties for a mechanic’s lien, and also has express notice of their claim, the right of the material men to the lien is not affected.

Statement of Lien. A statement of claim of a mechanic’s lien is 2 not rendered insufficient merely because indefinite as to dates of items.

*Appeal to Cedar District Court.*— Hon. W. N. Treici-iler, J udge.

Thursday, February 4, 1904.

ActioN to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Decree for plaintiffs, and defendants *appeal.*

Affirmed.

*F. J. Caslerline*for appellants.

*T. B. Hanley*for appellees.

McOlaiN, J.

The only controversy in this case is as to the correctness of the judgment against defendant Puetsch, who purchased the premises on which the improvement was made after the making of the improvement. His counsel contend that he had no notice of plaintiff’s lien, but it is clearly shown that he took by express provision in his deed subject to any claim of plaintiffs for a mechanic’s lien, and also with express notice of their claim. If, then, plaintiffs are entitled to the lien as against any one, it is valid as against Puetsch.

Objection is made to the lien on account of insufficiency of statement filed therefor, but the statement shows clearly that the lien was claimed, and with sufficient definiteness the items of the claim. The case is within the ruling *583in *Bangs v.*Berg, 82 Iowa, 352, in wbicb it was held that a statement was sufficient, although indefinite as to dates of items of material and labor furnished and performed.

Many other questions are raised on the record, such as that the contract was made with one of plaintiffs individually, and not with the plaintiff partnership as a firm; that the lien has been extinguished by payment; that plaintiffs are not the owners of the claim sued on; and the like. But an examination of the record satisfies us that there is no merit in any of these contentions, and a discussion of them would not be profitable.

The decree of the lower court is therefore a.t?eiuxed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Anthony Goodman, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Elray Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





|Date:
September 11, 2012 | Elray Resources Inc.                                              
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | By:/s/ Anthony Goodman                                            
|                         | Anthony GoodmanChief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer
|                         | (Principal Executive Officer
and Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4830-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4830-DR), dated September 30, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued October 4, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 30, 2024.

Bryan, Butts, Camden, Charlton, Glynn, Long, Newton, and Wayne Counties for Individual Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-24686 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 3, 2015

s0527t 

# Order

Clerk June 3, 2015

150286

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150286

COA: 311441

St. Clair CC: 12

- 000721

- FC

ROBIN SCOTT DUENAZ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order

addressin g: (1) whether evidence of a child’s prior sexual abuse is “sexual conduct”

barred by the rape

- shield statute, MCL 750.520j; (2) if so, whether evidence of prior

sexual abuse was nevertheless admissible in this instance to preserve the defendant’s

right o f confrontation and to present a defense (see People v Hackett , 421 Mich 338

(1984)); and (3) whether any error in excluding evidence of prior sexual abuse in this

case was harmless. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application

pap ers.

The Criminal Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, the Prosecuting Attorneys

Association of Michigan, and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to

file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determinati on of the

issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus

curiae.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
              This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
              from IJNT.net, Inc. December 31, 1999 financial statements and is
              qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
              statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        1,231
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 258
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10,799
<PP&E>                                        10,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                (1,291)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                22,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         16,527
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      20
<OTHER-SE>                                    6,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  22,742
<SALES>                                       2,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,375
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 13,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,395)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,395)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.74)



</TABLE>
## LONG CHAIN CHLORINATED PARAFFIN PRODUCTS SOLD TO RUBBER INDUSTRY

TRUCK UNLOADING TO STORAGE

(100 kg/batch) RAW RUBBER (900kg/batch)

CUSTOMER PERSONNEL EXPOSURE POINT NO RELEASE POINT OCCURS IN PROCESS CPAR STORAGE FORMULATION MIXING (1,000 kg /batch) RUBBER PRODUCT PROCESSING FINISHED RUBBER PRODUCT X A PRODUCT SOLD FOR RUBBER PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING (20,000kg/truck)
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Retalix Ltd. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), I,
Danny Moshaioff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge:

1.       
          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 21, 2006

| |  | /s/ Danny Moshaioff
Danny MoshaioffChief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12




         FIRST AMENDMENT dated as of July 3, 2001 to Amended Agreement dated as
of the 12th day of February 2001 by and between Elektryon, Inc. (the "Company")
and Joanne Firstenberg (the "Employee").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company entered into an Employment
Agreement dated December 15, 2000 which was amended by an Amended Agreement
dated as of the 12th day of February 2001 (the "Employment Agreement");

         WHEREAS, the parties desire to further amend the Employment Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1. Sections 2(b)(ii) and (iii) of the Employment Agreement are deleted
in their entirety and a new Section 2(b)(ii) to read as follows is substituted
therefor:

                  "(ii) on August 2, 2001 the Employee shall be entitled to a
                  bonus of $150,000, payable immediately."


         2. As amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.

         3. This First Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures
thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed as of the
date first above written.

                                        ELEKTRYON, INC.

                                        By: /s/ Wendell Adair
                                           -------------------
                                                Wendell Adair

                                        By: /s/ John Cavalier
                                           -------------------
                                                John Cavalier

                                        By: /s/ Curtis Olson
                                           -------------------
                                                Curtis Olson

                                        /s/ Joanne Firstenberg
                                        ----------------------
                                            Joanne Firstenberg
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          Jan-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                  669,129
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           4,796,686
<ALLOWANCES>                            778,261
<INVENTORY>                             389,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        5,842,546
<PP&E>                                  3,505,711
<DEPRECIATION>                          1,414,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          22,804,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   16,479,653
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                                59,917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                              2,665,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            22,804,377
<SALES>                                 5,134,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        5,134,396
<CGS>                                   5,744,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           2,849,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      395,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (3,800,253)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (3,800,253)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (3,800,253)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.68)
        

</TABLE>
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50898 

Conference Calendar

 

DAVID ERIC POPE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KATHY HOLUBER, Nurse;

OFFICER LOTT; 

SHIFT SUPERVISOR GONZALAES,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-97-CV-229-SS

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite for the

exercise of jurisdiction by this court. United States v. Carr,

979 F.2d 51, 55 (5th Cir. 1992).
No. 97-50898

-2-

David Eric Pope did not file a notice of appeal from the

district court’s judgment entered on September 4, 1997, within

the 30 days prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure

4(a) (1997) or within the time granted by the district court. 

Pope’s motions for extension of time to appeal, in which he

sought time to research and decide whether he had appealable

issues, do not clearly evince his desire to appeal and do not

serve as a notice of appeal. See Mosley, 813 F.2d at 660. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, as

Pope did not timely notice his intent to appeal. See Robbins v.

Maggio, 750 F.2d 405, 408 (5th Cir. 1985).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  filing  by  Fantatech,  Inc.  (the  "Company") of its
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2005  (the  "Quarterly  Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I,
Gary  Lui,  the  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1)  The  Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


Date:  November  10,  2005              By:  /s/  Gary  Lui
                                             -------------------------
                                             Gary  Lui
                                             Chief  Financial  Officer
#### Schubert, Respondent, vs. Schubert, Appellant.*

*April 13*

May *18, 1943.*

*125The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *James R. Joyce*of Appleton, and for the respondent on the brief of *Benton, Bosser, Becker & Parnell*of Appleton.

*

 Motion for rehearing denied, with $25 posts, on July 27, 1943.

Fairchild, J.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in its division of property. The rule recognized in Wisconsin is that the division of property in a divorce case *126is a matter peculiarly within the discretion of the trial court. *Voegeli v. Voegeli,*204 Wis. 363, 236 N. W. 123 (authorities cited). While the division made by the trial court was generous to respondent, in view of her $2,500 contribution we do not consider it unduly so except that appellant should be awarded the personal property listed as his in the order of October 3, 1942, *i. e.,*the tools, etc.

Counsel for appellant, having agreed to accept the assessed value as the true value of the homestead, is not now in a position to challenge the finding of the trial court.

*By the Court.*— Judgment modified so as to award the above described personalty to'the appellant, and as modified affirmed. No costs allowed. Appellant to pay clerk’s fees.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of Commercial E-Waste Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anna Chalmers, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Anna Chalmers


Anna Chalmers


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer




August 11, 2010
spouse



SPOUSE CONSENT 

Spouse Consent 

The undersigned spouse of Purchaser has read, understands, and hereby approves the Stock Option Exercise Agreement between Purchaser and the Company (the "Agreement"). In consideration of the Company's granting my spouse the right to purchase the Shares as set forth in this Exercise Agreement, the undersigned hereby agrees to be irrevocably bound by this Exercise Agreement and further agrees that any community property interest shall similarly be bound by this Exercise Agreement. The undersigned hereby appoints Purchaser as my attorney-in-fact with respect to any amendment or exercise of any rights under this Exercise Agreement. 


	
Date:

--------------------------- -------------------------------------

Name of Purchaser - Please Print

-------------------------------------

Signature of Purchaser's Spouse

Address:

-------------------------------------

-------------------------------------