alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 358

To freeze Federal discretionary spending at fiscal year 2000 levels, to extend

the discretionary budget caps until the year 2010, and to require a

two-thirds vote of the Senate to breach the caps.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. GRAMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees on

the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one committee reports, the other committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

A BILL

To freeze Federal discretionary spending at fiscal year 2000

levels, to extend the discretionary budget caps until the

year 2010, and to require a two-thirds vote of the Senate

to breach the caps.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Discipline for

5 a New Millennium Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 358 IS

1 SEC. 2. FREEZE AND EXTENSION OF THE CAPS.

2 Section 251(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emer3 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by striking

4 paragraphs (5) through (7) and inserting the following:

5 ‘‘(5) with respect to fiscal years 2001 through

6 2010 the limits of new budget authority and outlays

7 for fiscal year 2000;’’.

8 SEC. 3. TWO-THIRDS WAIVER REQUIREMENT.

9 Subsections (c)(2) and (d)(3) of section 904 of the

10 Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are amended by—

11 (1) striking ‘‘312(b),’’; and

12 (2) adding at the end the following: ‘‘A vote of

13 two-thirds of the Members duly chosen and sworn,

14 shall be required under this paragraph with respect

15 to section 312(b) of this Act.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1


                  Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:

a.     the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
       ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.


                                   /s/ Clark M. Mower
Date:   May 12, 2005              ____________________________________
                                  Clark M. Mower
                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                    /s/ John A. Sindt
Date:   May 12, 2005              ____________________________________
                                  John A. Sindt
                                  Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1:

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. Zugibe, as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|/s/ Kevin J. Zugibe        
|---------------------------
|Kevin J. Zugibe            
|Chief Executive Officer and
|Chairman of the Board      
|                           
|August 3, 2004
#### State, Appellant, vs. Flanagan and others, Respondents.

*October 25*

November *26, 1946.*

*522The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of the *Attorney General, Warren H. Resh,*assistant attorney general, and *Allan M. Strains,*district attorney of Forest county, and for the respondents on the brief of *Earl L. Kennedy*of Rhinelander.

Fatechild, J.

Sec. 358.12 (8), Stats., provides that the state may appeal “From rulings and decisions adverse to the state upon all questions of law arising on the trial, with the permission of the presiding judge, *in the same manner and to the same effect as if taken by the defendant.”*(Italics ours.)

Inasmuch as a defendant cannot appeal from anything less than a-final order or judgment, it follows that the state cannot. There was no final order or judgment made by the circuit court in this case, and the order suppressing the evidence is not in itself appealable under sec. 358.12 (8), Stats., therefore, this appeal must be dismissed.

However, because a reasonable doubt exists as to the correctness of the ruling upon important evidence and the trial court’s permission to the state to appeal in the matter, in ordering a remand of the record, it may be helpful to counsel to suggest'that under the cases of *State v. Witte,*243 Wis. 423, 10 N. W. (2d) 117, and *State v. McNitt,*244 Wis. 1, 11 N. W. (2d) 671, the proper procedure is, (1) either prior to or contemporaneous with the entry of a final judgment of acquittal to enter the order of permission to the state to appeal; (2) to avoid discharge of defendants pending the appeal. Under those cases this avoids the constitutional objections to double jeopardy and at the same time furnishes this court with subject matter that is appealable under sec. 358.12 (8), Stats.

*By the Court.*— Appeal dismissed.

Rectoe, J., took no part.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 334

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Power Act to remove the jurisdiction

of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to license

projects on fresh waters in the State of Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROJECTS ON FRESH WATERS IN THE STATE

4 OF HAWAII.

5 Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

6 797(e)) is amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘sev7 eral States, or upon’’ and inserting ‘‘several States (except

8 fresh waters in the State of Hawaii, unless a license would

9 be required under section 23), or upon’’.

Passed the Senate March 25, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 334

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Power Act to remove the juthe State of Hawaii. Commission to license projects on fresh waters in risdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Jinzhao Wu, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of China Northern Medical Device, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  November 14, 2008  /s/ Jinzhao Wu Jinzhao Wu President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to China Northern Medical Device, Inc. and will be retained by China Northern Medical Device, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 3.12  Certificate of Designation for 2006-C Series of Convertible Redeemable Preferred
Stock  dated November 7, 2006
 
 VERIDIEN CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
   1. Designation.
  1




---



##### 



2. Number of Shares; Par Value; Stated Capital.
  3. Relative Seniority.
  4. Voting.
  2




---



##### 



5. Dividends.
  6. Liquidation.
  3




---



##### 



7. Redemption.
    8. Conversion.
  4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



i.e.
   6




---



##### 



9. Adjustment to Conversion and Voting Rights.
 e.g.
  7




---



##### 



10. No Preemptive Rights.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 VERIDIEN CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Sheldon FentonSheldon Fenton, President 8
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, J. T. Malugen, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form l0-Q of Movie Gallery, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)                                  designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)                                 evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)                                  disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a)                                  all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)                                 any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 12, 2004 |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ J. T. Malugen       |   |
| J. T. Malugen           |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4828-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Florida; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4828-DR), dated September 28, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 1, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of September 28, 2024.

    Columbia, Gilchrist, Hamilton, Leon, and Suwannee Counties for 
Individual Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24670 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

HERLEY VELEZ

, Appellant,

v.

DVA LABORATORY SERVICES, INC.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2530

[ April 6, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Carol Lisa Phillips , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE19

-

007355

.

Chad A. Barr of Chad Barr Law, Altamonte Springs, for appellant.

Kurt T. Koehler of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C IKLIN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 5/24/2012 Form REP-703 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Sample Number: 122228-001 Date Collected:05/16/2012 06:30 Date Received:5/16/2012 

### 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ug/L Selenium, Se 210 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 05/23/2012 10:26 

### Sample Number: 122228-002 Date Collected:05/16/2012 06:30 Date Received:5/16/2012 

### 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ug/L Selenium, Se 21.2 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 05/23/2012 10:31 

### Sample Number: 122228-003 Date Collected:05/16/2012 06:30 Date Received:5/16/2012 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ug/L Selenium, Se 0.4 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 05/23/2012 10:36 J

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 122228 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
402 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-111, K2025-109.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24625 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board [Agency Docket Number: CRCCRRB-2025-0002-N]
 AGENCY: Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board received 404 pages of records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) related to seven civil rights cold case incidents. NARA and the FBI did not propose any postponements of disclosure. On October 11, 2024, the Review Board determined that the records should be publicly disclosed in the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection. By issuing this notice, the Review Board complies with section 7(c)(4) of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 that requires the Review Board to publish in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         its determinations on the disclosure or postponement of records in the Collection no more than 14 days after the date of its decision.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephannie Oriabure, Chief of Staff, Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board, 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, (771) 221-0014, 
                        *info@coldcaserecords.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Incident 
                             identifier
Agency
Number of pages2023-002-010
NARA
602023-002-010
FBI
12024-003-007
NARA
32024-003-021
NARA
1742024-003-026
NARA
232024-003-045
NARA
342024-003-048
NARA
32024-003-049
NARA
106
 *Authority:*Public Law 115-426, 132 Stat. 5489 (44 U.S.C. 2107) Dated: October 17, 2024. Stephannie Oriabure, Chief of Staff.


[FR Doc. 2024-24636 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820-SY-P
<pre>

EXHIBIT 10.11  1996 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF PATRICIA SPIGNO

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective the 24th day of
July 1996, by and between Conectisys, Inc., a Colorado corporation
("CONECTISYS"), ("Employer"), and Patricia A. Spigno ("Employee").

The following amendment to the language of paragraph 2 regarding duties and
paragraph 3 regarding bonus compensation are hereby amended as follows and are
effective retroactively to the initial signing of the Employment Agreement
dated October 2, 1995.

2. Duties.  Employee shall devote his full time and efforts to the business of
Employer, and shall be a an officer of Conectisys holding the title of
Secretary & Treasurer.

3. Compensation. Employee shall further receive a bonus, paid at year end,
equal to two percent (2%) of all net profits earned by Conectisys. Employee
shall receive said compensation through an option to purchase up to a maximum
of 500,000 shares of Conectisys Corporation restricted stock under rule 144 at
a cost of Sixty (60%) of the average market value during the prior 180 days of
trading; this option shall remain open for five (5) years with an option to
renew said option for an additional five (5) years.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed as of the day and year first above written.


Employee:___________________________________
         PATRICIA  A. SPIGNO



Employer:___________________________________
         RICHARD DOWLER
         CFO
#### State ex rel. Murray, Petitioner, vs. Reis, Circuit Judge, and another, Respondents.

*September 16*

October *11, 1949.*

*508
      *Kersten & McKinnon*of Milwaukee, for the petitioner.

The *Attorney General, Stewart G. Honeck,*deputy attorney general, and *Robert W. Arthur,*district attorney of Dane county, for the respondent state.

*Alvin C. Reis, in pro. per.*

Fairchild, J.

The affidavit of prejudice was clearly defective, Therefore, at the time of entering the order to suppress the adverse examination, the court, as then constituted with the Hon. Alvin C. Reis presiding, had jurisdiction to rule upon the matter. There was no valid and effective objection to the venue then laid.

With reference to the point attempted to be made that the judge disqualified himself by accepting petitioner’s objectionable affidavit, it appears that the jurisdiction to rule upon the *509motion was not affected by anything then occurring. He said, “the court will accept Senator Murray’s statement that he cannot have a fair trial before me, but the court considers that the affidavit is not going to block me out from ruling on this preliminary question of law upon which my ruling cannot hurt the defendant whatsoever, even if it is against him, because it is a ruling on a question of law and I cannot, legally, be any more prejudiced on a question of law than can any judge in Wisconsin and, if I am wrong, the ruling is thoroughly reviewable before the supreme court of Wisconsin and its seven justices.”

*By the Court.*— Application denied.