alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1
  Subsidiaries
    of Mediacom LLC
  State of Incorporation

Names Under WhichSubsidiary

or Organization

Subsidiary does BusinessMediacom Arizona LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Arizona LLCMediacom Cable LLCMediacom California LLC

Delaware

Mediacom California LLCMediacom Capital Corporation

New York

Mediacom Capital CorporationMediacom Delaware LLC

New York

Mediacom Delaware LLCMaryland Mediacom DelawareMediacom Illinois LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Illinois LLCMediacom Indiana LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Indiana LLCMediacom Indiana Partnerco LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Indiana PartnercoMediacom Indiana Holdings, L.P.

Delaware

Mediacom Indiana Holdings, L.P.Mediacom Iowa LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Iowa LLCMediacom Minnesota LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Minnesota LLCMediacom Southeast LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Southeast LLCMediacom New York LLCMediacom Wisconsin LLC

Delaware

Mediacom Wisconsin LLCZylstra Communications Corporation

Minnesota

Zylstra Communications CorporationIllini Cable Holding, Inc.

Illinois

Illini Cable Holding, Inc.Illini Cablevision of Illinois, Inc.

Illinois

Illini Cablevision of Illinois, Inc.
I, Richard Hiron, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bow Valley Ventures,  Inc. (the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  October 10, 2008/s/Richard HironBy:Richard HironPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nos. 04-16-00274-CR & 04-16-00275-CR

Gabriel Barrera ZAMARRIPA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2014CR5915 & 2014CR5916

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 1, 2016

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

Gabriel Barrera Zamarripa filed a notice of appeal seeking to challenge his convictions in 

three district court causes.1 However, there is no judgment of conviction in the underlying causes 

(i.e., trial court numbers 2014CR5915 & 2014CR5916), only judgments of dismissal. 

With certain exceptions not implicated here, this court has jurisdiction to consider an 

appeal filed by a criminal defendant only after a final judgment of conviction. See TEX. CODE 

 1 In appeal nos. 04-16-00272-CR, 04-16-00274-CR, and 04-16-00275-CR, Zamarripa challenges his convictions in 

trial court nos. 2014-CR-5319, 2014-CR-5915 and 2014-CR-5916, respectively. 
04-16-00274-CR & 04-16-00275-CR

- 2 -

CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02 (West 2006) (providing that criminal defendant may appeal conviction); 

State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) (noting that defendant’s general 

right to appeal under Article 44.02 “has always been limited to appeal from a ‘final judgment’”); 

Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961) (holding that court’s judgment 

discharging criminal defendant from liability was not appealable judgment). Absent a judgment

of conviction, we lack jurisdiction to consider Zamarripa’s appeals. See Ballard v. State, Nos. 01-

08-00947-CR, 01-08-00948-CR, 2009 WL 3248197, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 

8, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing one appeal for want of 

jurisdiction because underlying cause was dismissed and had no judgment of conviction against 

appellant).

Because the underlying causes were dismissed, no final appealable orders exist for our 

review. Thus, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Power3 MedicalProducts, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Steven B. Rash, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
|                      | By:    | /s/ Steven B. Rash                                     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Name:  | Steven B. Rash                                         |
|                      | Title: | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive  Officer) |
| Date: April 28, 2006 |   | Power3 Medical Products, Inc.                          |

 

1

----
#### Souster, Cabeen & Humbert, Appellees, v. Isaac Black, Appellant.

’Evidence: -taken subject to objection: eraotioe. Where, upon trial to the court, certain evidence is admitted subject to an objection, and the objector does not except, and no other action is had upon the point, the objection is waived, and can not be renewed in the supreme court.

*Appeal from Louisa District Court.*— Hon. W. R. Lewis, Judge.

Wednesday, February 1, 1893.

Action for the recovery of specific personal property. Judgment for the plaintiffs, and the defendant *appeals.*—

Affirmed.

*Fred*Courts, *Jr.,*and *L. A. Beiley,*for appellant.

*F. W. Tatloch,*for appellees.

Granger, J.

— The property in controversy is thirty-five acres of standing corn, the plaintiff firm claiming it by virtue of a chattel mortgage made by one William Bell, who was the owner. The defendant’s claim is based upon an execution levy at the instance of Pritz & Adelsdorf, who are judgment creditors of Bell. In the district court the cause was tried without a jury, and when the plaintiff offered in evidence its mortgage, it was objected to on the ground that, because of a defective acknowledgment, the record thereof did not impart constructive notice. It is not necessary that we should consider the sufficiency of the acknowledgment. The mortgage was “admitted subject to objection.” To the ruling no exception was *520taken, without which, this court can not review the action of the district court. No other action seems to have been taken on the objection during the progress of the trial. The exception must be taken at the time of the decision. Code, section 2831; *Nagel v. Guittar,*62 Iowa, 510. .With the mortgage in evidence, the testimony is such that the court could well find for the plaintiff as to the right of possession.

The district court gave judgment for the plaintiff for ten dollars as damages for wrongful detention of the property. It is urged that there is no evidence whatever to support the judgment for. damages. The amount of the judgment for damages is little more than nominal, and could very properly be found from the facts of the case, without testimony directed especially thereto. The judgment is aeeikmed.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 442

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel LOOKING GLASS.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. KERREY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

LOOKING GLASS.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

5 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

6 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

7 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of title 46, United

8 States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue
2

•S 442 IS

1 a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorse2 ment for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

3 LOOKING GLASS, United States official number

4 925735.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Timothy S. NelsonTimothy S. NelsonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: November 13, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MAP Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



/s/ Christopher Y. ChaiChristopher Y. ChaiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


Dated: November 13, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Osler Incorporated for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Osler Incorporated.                                                                       |

| Dated: May 4, 2010 |                        |   |
|--------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|               |                        |   |
|               | /s/ C. Leo Smith            |   |
|               |                        |   |
|               | C. Leo Smith, President,    |   |
|               | Chief Executive Officer and |   |
|               | Chief Financial Officer     |   |

----
#### Lietz and wife, Respondents, vs. Bogumill, Appellant.

*June 12*

July *1, 1947.*

*201The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Lewis J. Charles*of Medford, and for the respondents on the brief of *Oscar Rademacher*of Medford.

Fairchild, J.

Plomestead exemptions protect a resident owner against a loss of his homestead under execution, unless for the purchase price. Under the evidence referred to in the statement of facts, the findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported. The place was purchased with the *bona fide*intention of making it the homestead of the parties. The intention to exercise their privilege appears from their acts and the actual occupancy. All this gives the premises the *202character of a homestead. The owners of that homestead have not abandoned it.

The homestead-exemption law of this state, sec. 272.20, Stats., is liberal in the protection it affords for the debtor who is the resident owner of property. The law specifically provides that the exemption is not impaired by temporary removal with the intention to reoccupy the premises. Nor is the exemption impaired by the sale of the property, for the proceeds of such a sale are exempt for two years when held for the purpose of acquiring a new homestead.

The courts in enforcing the provisions of sec. 272.20, Stats., have construed them liberally. *Binzel v. Grogan,*67 Wis. 147, 29 N. W. 895. It has been held, for instance, that one who moves to another state, remaining there for some three years and voting there, did not necessarily thereby abandon his Wisconsin homestead. *Minnesota Stoneware Co. v. McCrossen,*110 Wis. 316, 85 N. W. 1019. A judgment docketed against the resident owner of a homestead does not become a lien on the property when the owner subsequently contracts to sell it and conveys his interest to a third party. *Smith v. Zimmerman,*85 Wis. 542, 55 N. W. 956. Rural premises including fifteen cottages used for rental purposes and one cottage which was occupied by the owner, except during the winter months, was considered to be a homestead. *Roche v. Du Bois,*223 Wis. 438, 271 N. W. 84. These cases illustrate how the homestead-exemption law of this state has been applied in the past, and they illustrate, too, the policy that must be considered in deciding the case at bar.

The plaintiffs did not intend to abandon the homestead they had established on the tavern premises. They did intend to sell those premises if they could. It is stoutly maintained that it was because of the uncertainty of a sale, developing because of defendant’s judgment against Mr. Lietz, that the arrangement qualifying the property as a homestead was made and continued. Because of failing health Mrs. Lietz moved *203to near-by property she had acquired, and arrangements were made for the prospective purchaser to operate the tavern. While making these necessary arrangements, the plaintiffs, nevertheless, did all they could to manifest their intention still to regard the tavern premises as their homestead.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
*November 14, 1944.*

#### Hackbarth and wife, Respondents, vs. Harry E. Thur, Inc., Appellant. Carl Miller Lumber Company, Respondent, vs. Hackbarth and others, Defendants: Harry E. Thur, Inc., Appellant.

For the appellant: *Harry E. Thur*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents Hackbarth: *E. V. Novotny*and G../. *Kenehan,*both of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

The judgment in the consolidated actions appealed from is affirmed except as to the defendant Percy Wilson Mortgage & Finance Corporation, as to which the appeal has been dismissed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED AL AN B. YERMAL , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2222 LT Case No. 2010

- CF

- 000639 STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. _______________________________/ Decision filed February 21, 2023 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citru s County , Richard A. Howard, J udge. Alan B. Yermal, B ushnell, p ro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, an d Pamela J

. K oller , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.

EVAN DER , HARRIS and JAY , JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverdale Mining Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Vladimir Vaskevich, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 16th day of August, 2010.



| | VLADIMIR VASKEVICH                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Vladimir Vaskevich                                 
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Riverdale Mining Inc. and will be retained by Riverdale Mining Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
Exhibit 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form l0-Q for the period ended July 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. T. Malugen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  August 10, 2007


/s/  J. T. Malugen
------------------------------------
Name:  J. T. Malugen
Its:  Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cardo Medical, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Derrick Romine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Derrick Romine
                      Derrick RomineChief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  May 16, 2011

---