alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#                                                     Madhu Sudhan  Chinthavali                                            

###                         Section Head, Energy Systems Integration                    

## Contact

chinthavalim@ornl.gov|865.341.1411

## Publications

##   Use of Grid-Forming Medium-Voltage Power Electronics Hub in a Microgrid Setting...

November, 2023

##   Improving Resiliency for Electric Vehicle Charging

July, 2023

##   GA-Based Voltage Optimization of Distribution Feeder with High-Penetration of DERs Using Megawatt-Scale Units...

June, 2023

##   Automated Controller Hardware-In-The-Loop Testbed for EV Charger Resilience Analysis

June, 2023

##   A 75 kVA Intelligent Power Stages (IPS) Unit Design for Future Grid-interface Application...

December, 2022

### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
- …
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast » 

View All

## Key Links

ORCID

## Organizations

Energy Science and Technology Directorate

Electrification and Energy Infrastructures Division

Grid Research Integration and Deployment Center

Oak Ridge National Laboratory				1 Bethel Valley Road				Oak Ridge, TN 37830

(+1) 865.576.7658

#### Connect With Us

                                  -  Partnerships 
                                  -  Visit 
                                  -  Contact 

#### News

                                  -  Newsroom 
                                  -  Newsletter Signup 
                                  -  Media Contacts 

#### Research

                                  -  Science Areas 
                                  -  User Facilities 
                                  -  Centers & Institutes 

#### Resources

                                  -  Internal Users 
                                  -  Directory 

                                  -  Privacy 
                                  -  Accessibility/508 
                                  -  Nondiscrimination/1557 
                                  -  Vulnerability Disclosure Program
Docket No: FAA-2015-1278 Dir ID: 2014-NM-223-AD
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                       926
<INVENTORY>                                     18,807
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,797
<PP&E>                                          38,719
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,000
<BONDS>                                         25,106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,859
<SALES>                                        104,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,465
<CGS>                                           87,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 945
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,822
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,070
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,752
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee

Ozone Review Panel for the Reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004

February 7, 2011

Re: Comments for Consideration at the CAS AC Teleconferences, February 18 and
March 3, 2011

Dear Members of the CASAC:

Please accept these comments from the Greater Yellowstone Coalition for your reconsideration of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone.

CASAC has una nimously supported establishment of a primary NAAQS for ozone in the range of 0.060 to 0.070 parts per million (ppm) over an eight

- hour averaging period. CASAC has also supported establishment of a unique secondary

NAAQS for ozone that is cumulative and e xtends over the entire growing season. CASAC has conveyed these views to the EPA Administrator in letters dated October 24, 2006, March 26, 2007, April 7, 2008 and February 19, 2010.

Given that CASAC has not wavered in its consistent position to establis h ozone NAAQS in the above ranges, we urge CASAC to continue to recommend to the Administrator to promulgate the final rule establishing a new ozone NAAQS. The science has been strong that the right course is CASAC’s support for a primary NAAQS

in the 0.0 60 to 0.070 ppm range and a secondary standard based on the W126 form within the range of 7 to 15 ppm

- hours. It is appropriate that the CASAC recommend a range from which the Administer is to select the appropriate level of a NAAQS that protects public he alth and welfare.2 We remind you of our signed letter of March 5, 2010, submitted on our behalf by Bruce Pendery of the Wyoming Outdoor Council. This letter describing our comments on this rulemaking should be readily available to the CASAC as: D ocket No. EPA

- HQ

OAR

- 2005

- 0172. Exhibit 1 submitted with these comments was a well

- reasoned petition for rulemaking filed by several Wyoming citizens asking the Wyoming Environmental Quality Council to set a State primary ozone standard at 0.065 ppm.

Muc h of the analysis and support for the petition is based on EPA documentation of which the CASAC was involved in developing and, thus, is familiar with.

Thank you for your consideration of these comments.

Sincerely,

Lloyd Dorsey

Greater Yellowstone Coalition
Box 4857 Jackson, WY 83001

307

- 734

- 6004 ldorsey@greateryellowstone.org
#### Schmidt v. Williams.

1. Vendor and Vendee: title bond: timbas essence: failure to pay: forfeiture. One who purchases land and takes a bond for a deed in which time is made the essence of the contract, and then fails to make payment as stipulated, forfeits all right to the land, and his rights are extinguished at the option of the vendor. (Compare *Iowa Railroad Land Go. v. Mickel,*41 Iowa, 402.)

2. Trespass: raisin® crop on another’s land: who entitled to crop. Where, against the directions of the real owner of land, one who holds a lease therefor from another, who has no title, proceeds to raise a crop thereon, such crop belongs to the real owner, and he may recover it by replevin from him who raised it.

*Appeal from Lyon Circuit Court.*

Thursday, June 30.

AotioN in replevin. There was a trial to the court, and judgment was rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

*Van Wagenen*c& MoMillen, for appellant.

*Alfred*Morton, for appellee.

Adams, Ch. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, Augusta Schmidt, to obtain possession of a crop of grain. The defendant had raised the same, and claimed to be entitled to it by reason of such fact. It is undisputed that the plaintiff held the legal title to the land from a time anterior to the sowing of the grain. The plaintiff’s deed was offered in evidence, and testimony was also introduced by her showing that, before the grain was sown, she notified the defendant of her ownership, and forbade him from cultivating the land or attempting to raise a crop. He claimed, however, a right to occupy and cultivate the land as a tenant of one Rankin. The plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient, standing by itself, to make a case for her, and the question is as to whether the facts established by the defendant were sufficient to overcome *318it. In onr opinion, they were not. The facts appear to be that at one time Rankin was the equitable owner of the land, and as such rented it to the defendant, who went into possession. Rankin held under a bond for a deed. But time ivas made of the essence of the contract, and Rankin failed to make the payments as the bond required, and when they were afterwards tendered the vendor refused to receive them, because not made in time. He then sold the land to the plaintiff, who claimed possession of it, and gave notice to the defendant as above stated, and forbade him from raising a crop. It seems to us that, upon this state of facts, Rankin’s interest in the land became extinguished. *Iowa Railroad Land Co. v. Miekel,*41 Iowa, 402.

The defendant’s forbidden acts in proceeding to raise a crop, and in excluding the plaintiff from the land, were wrongful, and we cannot hold that out of his wrongful acts a right accrued to him in the crop.

We think the judgment must be

Ruiv Hiusnn.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          57,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,059,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,566,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,638,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,942,000
<PP&E>                                       4,148,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,044,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,837,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,694,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,995,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,837,000
<SALES>                                     18,207,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,207,000
<CGS>                                       11,528,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,159,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             266,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,254,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,254,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the Quarterly
     Report on Form 10-Q of SEEC, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period
     ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
     Commission on August 22, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Richard J. Goldbach,
     treasurer and chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
     18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (3)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
     other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
     written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
     and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
     Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:  August 22, 2003                     /s/    RICHARD J. GOLDBACH
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                  Richard J. Goldbach
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
DENIED and Opinion Filed July 26, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00654-CV 

IN RE ROCKY CORONADO, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 283rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F-1400535 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove 

Opinion by Justice Goldstein 

In his July 3, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from the 

trial court’s failure to file and rule on a separate petition for writ of mandamus 

seeking to compel the district clerk to accept one or more documents presented for 

filing. 

To establish a right to mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator must 

show that the trial court violated a ministerial duty and there is no adequate remedy 

at law. In re State ex rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. 

proceeding). To obtain mandamus relief compelling the trial court to rule on a 

motion, a relator must show (1) the trial court had a legal duty to rule on the motion, 
 –2– 

(2) the relator requested a ruling, and (3) the trial court failed or refused to do so 

within a reasonable time. In re Prado, 522 S.W.3d 1, 2 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2017, 

orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). It is relator’s burden to provide a record sufficient to 

establish his right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 

1992) (orig. proceeding). 

Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure in numerous respects. See, e.g., TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(a)–(k), 52.7(a). For 

instance, a petition seeking mandamus relief must include a certification stating that 

the relator “has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual statement in 

the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the appendix or 

record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j). Relator failed to certify his petition. 

Additionally, Rule 52.3(k)(1)(A) requires a relator to file an appendix with his 

petition that contains “a certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any 

other document showing the matter complained of.” TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A). 

Rule 52.7(a)(1) requires the relator to file with his petition “a certified or sworn copy 

of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief that was filed in 

any underlying proceeding.” TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1). Relator failed to include 

with his petition any documents material to his claim for relief. 

 
 –3– 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

230654F.P05 

/Bonnie Lee Goldstein/

BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN 

JUSTICE
----

**Exhibit        32.01**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF        2002**

| 1 | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2 | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company                  as of the dates and for the periods explained in the                  report. |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                    Michael Garin       | /s/                    Wallace Macmillan   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                       |
| Michael                    Garin           | Wallace                    Macmillan       |
|                                       |                                       |
| Chief                    Executive Officer | Chief                    Financial Officer |
|                                       |                                       |
|                                       |                                       |
| May                    3, 2007             |                                       |

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 85190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24802]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14787-004]


Black Canyon Hydro, LLC; Notice of Revised Schedule for the 
Seminoe Pumped Storage Project

    This notice revises the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's 
(Commission) schedule for processing Black Canyon Hydro, LLC's license 
application for the Seminoe Pumped Storage Project. A prior notice 
issued on January 10, 2024, identified an anticipated schedule for 
issuance of draft and final National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
documents and a final order for the project. On September 4, 2024, 
Black Canyon Hydro, LLC requested an extension of time to file its 
historic properties management plan by October 31, 2024. Commission 
staff issued a letter approving the extension of time on September 11, 
2024. To account for the additional time needed for Black Canyon Hydro, 
LLC to file the required information, the application will be processed 
according to the following revised schedule.
    Notice of Ready for Environmental Analysis: January 2025.
    Draft NEPA Document: September 2025.
    Final NEPA Document: April 13, 2026.
    In addition, in accordance with title 41 of the Fixing America's 
Surface Transportation Act, enacted on December 4, 2015, agencies are 
to publish completion dates for all federal environmental reviews and 
authorizations. This notice identifies the Commission's anticipated 
schedule for issuance of the final order for the project, which is 
based on the revised issuance date for the final NEPA document. 
Accordingly, we currently anticipate issuing a final order for the 
project no later than:
    Issuance of Final Order: July 16, 2026.
    If a schedule change becomes necessary, an additional notice will 
be provided so that interested parties and government agencies are kept 
informed of the project's progress.

    Dated: October 18, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-24802 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on
Form 10-K to which this certification is attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of
Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and
(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.

|Date: November 8, 2004 |  |                                                                                                                                        
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | /s/THOMAS E. D'AMBRA, PH.D.Name: Thomas E. D'Ambra, Ph.D.
Title: Chairman of the Board, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bosco Holdings,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 16, 2009  /s/ Alexander Dannikov ---------------------------------------- Alexander Dannikov, President, C.E.O. and Chief Financial Officer