alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No

. 01

- 14

- 00 072- CR No. 01- 14 -00073- CR

In the 

### Court of Appeals
for the 

### First District of Texas
At Houston



No . 1233998 No. 1401120 In the 18 5 th District Court Of Harris County, Texas





## LARRY RICHARD Appellant

v. 

## THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee





### STATE’S THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE AN APPELLATE BRIEF



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules

10.5(b)(1) and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this ACCEPTED 01-14-00073-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/26/2015 9:16:03 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKmotion for an extension of time in which to file the State’s brief in this cause, and,

in support thereof, presents the following:

1. Appellant was convicted of the felony offense of aggravated assault

.

2

. The State’s brief wa s due on January 26, 2015

.

4

. An extension of time in which to file the S tate’s brief is requested until February 25 , 2015

.

5

. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for the requested extension :

i. The attorney previously assigned to this appeal is no longer with the Harris County District Attorney ’ s Office. The undersigned attorney was assigned to this appeal on January 26, 2015.

ii. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation of the State’s Brief in Cause No. 14

- 14

- 00139

- CR, Isaac Smith, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

.

iii. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation

o f the State ’ s Brief in Cause No. 01

- 12

- 01175

- CR, Mark Rascoe, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

.

iv. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation of the State ’ s Brief in Cause No. 01

- 12

- 00422

- CR, Benjamin Maurine Sadler, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

.
WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant an additional

extension of time until February 25 , 2015 in which to file the State’s brief in this

cause.Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Heather A. Hudson H EATHER A. H UDSON Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 755

- 5826 State Bar No. 24058991 hudson_heather@dao.hctx.net curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been submitted

for service by e

- filing t o the following address:

Deborah Summers P112 10 Steeplecrest, Ste. 120 Houston, Texas 77 065 T el: (281) 897

- 9600 summerspc@sbcglobal.net

/s/ Heather A. Hudson H EATHER A. H UDSON Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 755

- 5826 State Bar No. 24058991 Date: January 26, 2015
### In The Matter Of: JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC 

## HEARING DOCKET DocketNo. FAA-2014-0813 ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### Case No. 2012EA150022 Respondent

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

### Respondent, JetBlue Airways Corporation, hereby notifies the United State Department of Transportation, Office ofHearings, and the Complainant, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 

### 13.204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully requested to be forwarded as follows: Steven Raffaele HOLLAND & 

### KNIGHT LLP 31 West 52nd Street New York, New York 10019 Tel.: (212) 513-3200 Fax: (212)385-9010 Email: Steven.Raffaele@hklaw.com Respectfully submitted, By:

# SL~~~Li

# .. StevenRaffaere 

### .J Dated: January 30, 2015CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifythat on this day copies ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance were placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail

- Return Receipt Requested addressed as follows: Christian Lewerenz, Esq. FederalAviationAdministration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 Tel: 718 553-3273 Fax: 718 995-5699 Email: christian.lewerenz@faa.gov Federal AviationAdministration (Original and one copy) 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building- Suite 2Wl000 IF FILING BYFEDERAL EXPRESS: Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 600 Independence Avenue, SW WilburWright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430

Ma ·e B. Catillaz HOLLAND & KNIGHT LL 31 West 52nct Street New York, NewYork 10019



### 2
#### B. W. JONES and wife v. JORDAN H. PARKER.

*New Trial*— Jwrors—Impeaching *Verdict.*

1. Where the motion for a new trial is addressed to the discretion of the trial Judge, his action is not the subject of review on appeal.

2. The testimony of a member of the jury cannot be heard to impeach the verdict.

*(,State*v. *McLeod,*1 Hawks, 346; *Statev. Smallwood,*78 N. C., 563; cited and approved).

Civil action, tried before *Shipp, Judge,*and a jury, at Fall Term, 1886, of Gates Superior Court.

There was a judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiffs appealed.

The facts appear in the opinion.

*Mr. John Gatling,*for the plaintiffs.

No counsel for the defendant.

Davis, J.

-There is no error assigned in the record, but a motion was made for a new trial, based upon affidavits filed by some of the jurors, that they did not concur in the verdict, and by others that they did not understand portions of the charge of the Court.

Counter-affidavits by other members of the jury were also' filed. The case states, that “ the Court, considering the affidavits fully, and acting upon personal knowledge of what transpired in Court, in the exercise of its discretion, refused the motion.”

The granting of a new trial, when a matter of discretion, as in this case, is purely a subject for the consideration of the presiding Judge, and this Court has no power to review or control the exercise of his discretion. This is too well settled to need the citation of authority.

*34His Honor gave full consideration, to the affidavits of the jurors in regard to their verdict. In *State*v. *McLeod,*1 Hawks, 346, Henderson, Judge, said: “It has been long .settled, and very properly, that evidence impeaching their verdict, must not come from the jury; but must be shown by other testimonyand this has been affirmed in *State*v. Smallwood, 78 N. C., 563.

We call attention to these authorities, because we think it unsafe and unwise, as a rule, to permit verdicts to be impeached by the testimony of jurors rendering them.

In this case no error having been assigned in the record, and none appearing, the judgment must be affirmed. Let this be certified.

No error. Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I,  Jackelyn  Giroux,  President  of FoneFriend, Inc ( the "Company" ), certify,
pursuant  to  Section  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  that:

     The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three months
ended  December 31, 2003 (the " Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13  (a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934; and

     The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 26, 2004



                         /S/  Jackelyn  Giroux
                         ---------------------
                         Jackelyn Giroux, President/Director



<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4823-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation; Amendment No. 
1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation (FEMA-4823-
DR), dated September 24, 2024, and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Yolanda J. 
Jackson, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Tonia Pence as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24666 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
---

---

# EXHIBIT 8

PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES OF RETALIX
LTD.

|Subsidiary                                    | Country of
Residence | Business Name           
|--------------------------------------------- | -------------------- | ------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Retalix Holdings Inc.                         | United States (DE)   | Retalix USA Holdings    
|Retalix USA Inc.                              | United States (TX)   | Retalix USA             
|Retail Control Systems Inc.                   | United States (PA)   | Retalix USA, Pittsburgh 
|StoreNext Retail Technology LLC               | United States (DE)   | StoreNext USA           
|Palm Point Ltd.                               | Israel               | Palm Point              
|Tamar Industries M. R. Electronic (1985) Ltd. | Israel               | Tamar                   
|StoreAlliance.com, Ltd.                       | Israel               | StoreAlliance           
|StoreNext Ltd.                                | Israel               | StoreNext Israel        
|TradaNet Electronic Commerce Services Ltd.    | Israel               | Tradanet                
|IREX - Israel Retail Exchange Ltd.            | Israel               | IREX                    
|DemanDX Ltd.                                  | Israel               | DemanDX                 
|Cell-Time Ltd.                                | Israel               | Cell-Time               
|Retail College StoreNext Ltd.                 | Israel               | Retail College StoreNext
|P.O.S. (Restaurant Solutions) Ltd.            | Israel               | PRS                     
|Kohav Orion Advertising and Information Ltd.  | Israel               | Orion                   
|Retalix (UK) Limited                          | United Kingdom       | Retalix (UK)            
|Retalix Italia S.p.A                          | Italy                | Retalix Italia          
|M.P.S. Millennium Pos Solution S.r.l          | Italy                | M.P.S.                  
|Retalix France SARL                           | France               | Retalix France          
|Retalix Australia PTY Ltd.                    | Australia            | Retalix Australia       
|Retalix SA PTY Ltd.                           | South Africa         | Retalix SA              
|Retalix Japan Ltd.                            | Japan                | Retalix Japan           



---

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL MACON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 122 MM 2014

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24 th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Leave to File

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          56,688
<SECURITIES>                                     5,127
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                       369
<INVENTORY>                                      1,355
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,759
<PP&E>                                           3,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,191
<SALES>                                         44,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,838
<CGS>                                           10,004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,379
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,381
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                998
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       998
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4764-DR]
          - [Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Maine (FEMA-4764-DR), dated March 20, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

 This change occurred on September 17, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Georgeta Dragoiu, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Robert V. Fogel as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-24891 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 3

, 2011

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 1 1

- 00 478

- CV

____________

KIRK FORD , Appellant

V.

EG SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a SCOTTS LAWN SERVICE , Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 41307



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a n order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment

signed March 2 , 20 11 . The clerk’s record was filed August 8 , 201 1

. Appellant’s brief

was due September 7, 2011. Appellant did not file a brief or a motion for an extension of

time to file his brief

.

On September 29 , 201 1 , this c ourt issued an order stating that unless appellant filed

a brief, and a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late, on or before October 24

,2

2011 , the c ourt would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P

.

42.3(b). Appellant did not file a brief or any r esponse to our order

.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justice s Brown, Boyce, and McCally

.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7771** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. LACEY LEROY MCCLAM, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 01277

- TLW

- 1; 4:13

- cv - 01396

- TLW )

Submitted : February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19 , 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Lacey Leroy McClam, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinio ns are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lacey Leroy McClam, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a ce rtificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockr ell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitu tional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McClam has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny McClam’s motion for a certif icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 21.1 Subsidiaries of Triton PCS, Inc.**

 

The subsidiaries of Triton PCS, Inc. are as follows: 

 

Triton PCS Holdings Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 

 

Triton PCS License Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 

 

Triton PCS Equipment Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 

 

Triton PCS Operating Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 

 

Triton PCS Property Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 

 

Triton Management Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

 

Triton PCS Investment Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 

 

Triton PCS Finance Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation