alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CKrush, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jeremy Dallow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 15, 2008


By:


/s/ Jeremy DallowJeremy Dallow
Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24550]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS24-19]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of special closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) met for a Special Closed Meeting on this date.
    Location: Virtual meeting via Teams.
    Date: October 2, 2024.
    Time: 11:15 a.m. ET.

Action and Discussion Item

Personnel Matter

    The ASC convened a Special Closed Meeting to discuss a personnel 
matter pursuant to section 1104(b) of Title XI (12 U.S.C 3333(b)). No 
action was taken by the ASC.

Loretta Schuster,
Management & Program Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2024-24550 Filed 10-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
Exhibit 32





Section 1350 Certifications




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Shearson American REIT, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:




To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K (Amendment No. 4) of the Company for  the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  August 17, 2011




/s/ John Williams


John Williams


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





Dated:  August 17, 2011





/s/ Aaron J. Phipps


Aaron J. Phipps


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 41 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]






                                                         Calendar No. 2
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 41

To make it a violation of a right secured by the Constitution and laws 
of the United States to perform an abortion with the knowledge that the 
 abortion is being performed solely because of the gender of the fetus.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

 Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                            January 20, 1999

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To make it a violation of a right secured by the Constitution and laws 
of the United States to perform an abortion with the knowledge that the 
 abortion is being performed solely because of the gender of the fetus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Rights of Infants Act''.

SEC. 2. DEPRIVING PERSONS OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS BEFORE BIRTH.

    Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``Every person''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) For purposes of subsection (a), it shall be a deprivation of 
a `right' secured by the laws of the United States for an individual to 
perform an abortion with the knowledge that the pregnant woman is 
seeking the abortion solely because of the gender of the fetus. No 
pregnant woman who seeks to obtain an abortion solely because of the 
gender of the fetus shall be liable for such abortion in any manner 
under this section.''.
                                     





                                                         Calendar No. 2

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To make it a violation of a right secured by the Constitution and laws 
of the United States to perform an abortion with the knowledge that the 
 abortion is being performed solely because of the gender of the fetus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 20, 1999

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar`
MDE 

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230 

410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101• www.mde.state.md.us 

Martin O'Malley 

Governor 

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. 

Anthony G. Brown 

Lieutenant Governor 

DEC 2120\2 

The Honorable Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator (3RAOO) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia PA 19103-2023 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

Secretary 

f~ECEIVED 

EPA. REGION Ill 

0 1

- :'

1

Ce o ;• t-:HHDi·'i\L t.DM!N!ST!~ATCF 

Pursuant to the requirements of§ 110 of the Clean Air Act (Act), we are officially requesting approval 

of a revision to the State of Maryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP). This SIP revision provides a 

detailed listing of the requirements of§ 110(a)(2) of the Act and confirms that all implementation, 

maintenance, and enforcement measures are in place in Maryland for the 2008 Ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). 

A public hearing for this SIP revision was held in Baltimore, Maryland on December 21, 2012. All 

required administrative procedures were properly followed throughout the hearing process. 

The electronic copy (CD) includes an exact duplicate of the hard copy submittal. 

If you should have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at ( 41 0) 

537-3086 or George (Tad) Abum, Director of the Air and R~diation Management Administration at 

(410) 537-3255, or Ms. Diane Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning Program at (410) 537-

3250 or by email at dfranks@mde.state.md.us.· 

Sincerely, 

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. 

Secretary 

Enclosures 

cc: Diana Esher, Director, Air Protection Division, USEP A Region III 

George (Tad) S. Abum, Jr., Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration 

Diane Franks, Manager, Air Quality Plaruiing Program 

~ Recycled Paper www. mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service 
. ...
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee

Ozone Review Panel for the Reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS

1300 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004

February 7, 2011

Re: Comments for Consideration at the CASAC Teleconferences, February 18 and 

March 3, 2011

Dear Members of the CASAC:

Please accept these comments from the Greater Yellowstone Coalition for your 

reconsideration of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. 

CASAC has unanimously supported establishment of a primary NAAQS for 

ozone in the range of 0.060 to 0.070 parts per million (ppm) over an eight-hour 

averaging period. CASAC has also supported establishment of a unique secondary 

NAAQS for ozone that is cumulative and extends over the entire growing season. 

CASAC has conveyed these views to the EPA Administrator in letters dated October 24, 

2006, March 26, 2007, April 7, 2008 and February 19, 2010.

Given that CASAC has not wavered in its consistent position to establish ozone 

NAAQS in the above ranges, we urge CASAC to continue to recommend to the 

Administrator to promulgate the final rule establishing a new ozone NAAQS. The 

science has been strong that the right course is CASAC’s support for a primary NAAQS 

in the 0.060 to 0.070 ppm range and a secondary standard based on the W126 form 

within the range of 7 to 15 ppm-hours. It is appropriate that the CASAC recommend a 

range from which the Administer is to select the appropriate level of a NAAQS that 

protects public health and welfare. 
2

We remind you of our signed letter of March 5, 2010, submitted on our behalf by 

Bruce Pendery of the Wyoming Outdoor Council. This letter describing our comments 

on this rulemaking should be readily available to the CASAC as: Docket No. EPA-HQOAR-2005-0172. Exhibit 1 submitted with these comments was a well-reasoned 

petition for rulemaking filed by several Wyoming citizens asking the Wyoming 

Environmental Quality Council to set a State primary ozone standard at 0.065 ppm. 

Much of the analysis and support for the petition is based on EPA documentation of 

which the CASAC was involved in developing and, thus, is familiar with. 

Thank you for your consideration of these comments.

Sincerely,

Lloyd Dorsey

Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Box 4857 Jackson, WY 83001

307-734-6004

ldorsey@greateryellowstone.org
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON DC
Friends ofthe East Hampton Airport, Inc. eta!., Complainants, FAA DocketNo. 16-15-02 v. Town ofEast Hampton, NY Respondent.
ORDER On March 18,2015, counsel for Respondent, Town ofEastHampton, New York, filed a Motionpursuantto 14 C.P.R.§ 16.11, requesting an extension oftime to May I, 2015 to file its Response inthe above-captioned matter. Counsel advised that the Respondent needs the additional time in order to adequately respond to the Complainant's allegations, and allowthe Town adequate time to prepare its pleadings. The Motion adds that the extension will promote the efficient andjust resolution ofthe case byprovidingthe FAA with a complete factual record. Counsel further advised that the Respondent does not oppose this request for an extension oftime. Part 16 is intended to expedite substantially the handling and disposition ofairportrelated complaints. [See, Rules of Practicefor Federally-AssistedAirportEnforcement Proceedings, Final Rule, 61 Fed. Reg. 53998 (October 16, 1996).] The rule provides that an extension oftime may be granted where necessary or appropriate for a fair and complete consideration ofmatters before the agency. See 14 C.P.R. § 16.ll(a). An extension oftime is reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, Respondent, Town ofEast Hampton, New York, is hereby granted an extension oftime in which to file its pleading. The Town'sresponse to the Complaint is due by May I, 2015.

Randall S. Fiertz 

### /



### I~ Director, Office ofAirport Compliance and Management AnalysisCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 27,2015, I caused to be placed inthe United States mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy ofthe foregoing Order addressed to:
Counsel for Respondent Elizabeth Vail Town Attorney Town ofEast Hampton 159 Pantigo Road East Hampton, NY 11937 EVail@EHamptonNY.Gov

Counsel for Complainant Leonard D. Kirsch McBreen & Kopko 500 North Broadway Jericho, NY 11753 lkirsch@mklawnyc.com

Hand-Delivered to: W. Eric Pilsk Peter J. Kirsch Catherine van Heuven Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 1001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036 epilsk@kaplankirsch.com pkirsch@kaplankirsch.com cvanheuven@kaplankirsch.com Telephone: (202) 955-5600 Facsimile: (202) 955-5616

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 

# /;/! 

# ·i /

I /



### ~'', / _/'\ I



# l-~~~Ro!Urts~ Office ofAirport Compliance and ManagementAnalysis
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Triton
PCS, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, Michael E. Kalogris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)    the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael E. KalogrisName: Michael E. Kalogris Title: Chief Executive Officer Date: May 21, 2003
Order entered September 17, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00326
- CR RAYNALDO MARTINEZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Coun ty Criminal Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA17
- 24740
- A



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 16, 2019 third motion for extension of t ime to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed o n or before October 16, 2019

. If appellant’s brief is not filed by October 16, 2019, this appeal may be abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A0 96 5 . NEVA T. MCDONALD v

. EDW A RD D. MCDONALD.

Th e part i es were di vo rced p u rs u an t t o a fi n al ju d g m en t an d d ecree en t ered o n J u l y 2 5 , 2 0 1 8

. Th e wi fe, Nev a T. M cDo n al d
, f i l e d a n o t i ce o f ap p eal o n Au g u s t 6,
2 0 1 8 . W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s di ct i o n

. A p p e a l s fro m “

j u d gm en t s o r o rd ers in d i v orce, al i m o n y , an d o t her d o m es t i c rel at i o n s cas es ” m

u s t be m ad e b y ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret io n ary ap peal

. O C GA §
5 -6 -3 5 (a) (2 ). “ [C] om p l i an ce wi t h t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal s p ro ced u re i s ju ri s d i ct i o n al .” Fa b e v. Fl o yd
, 1 9 9 Ga. Ap p

. 3 2 2 , 3 3 2 (1 ) (4 0 5 SE2 d 2 65 ) (1 9 9 1 ). Th e wi fe’ s fai l u re t o fo l l o w t h e d i scret i o n ary ap p eal p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f j u ri s d i ct i o n

o v er t h i s d i rect ap p eal . Acco rd i n g l y , t h e wi fe’ s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. December 28, 2018

12/28/2018
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 82605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP25-38-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Housekeeping and Update to 
Rate Sheets for Certain Rate Schedule Options to be effective 11/4/
2024.
    Filed Date: 10/3/24.
    Accession Number: 20241003-5162.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/24.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ffb0afafbf999a8d9cd1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e6a9b6b6a680839485c8818990">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 4, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-23518 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 18, 

2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00484-CV

IN RE WENDY OXMAN, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

257th District Court

Harris, County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-75384

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On May 17, 2012, relator Wendy Oxman filed a petition for writ of mandamus in 

this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the 

petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Judy Warne, presiding judge of 

the 257th District Court of Harris County to vacate the portion of her order requiring 

relator to vacate the property at 8622 Fountainbleu.

On May 14, 2012, the respondent signed an “Order on Enforcement of Property 

Division and Counterclaims.” In that order, the court denied relator’s petition for 
2

enforcement of property division and ordered relator to vacate the premises known as the 

“Fountainbleu Home” no later than May 20, 2012, before 5:00 p.m. Relator seeks relief 

from this order via mandamus.

Mandamus relief is available when the trial court abuses its discretion and there is 

no adequate remedy at law, such as by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 

124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004); In re Dana Corp., 138 S.W.3d 298, 301 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding) (citing Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex.1992) (orig. 

proceeding)). A party affected by a divorce decree that provides for the division of

property may request enforcement of that decree by filing a suit to enforce in the court 

that rendered the decree. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 9.001(a). An order to enforce the 

division of the property is limited to an order to assist in the implementation of or to 

clarify the prior order. Id. § 9.002. Orders issued in a suit to enforce are final judgments. 

DeGroot v. DeGroot, 260 S.W.3d 658, 664 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.). The order 

of enforcement is reviewable by appeal; therefore, mandamus relief is not available.

Relator has not established entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of 

mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and also deny 

relator’s request to stay proceedings.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Boyce and McCally.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Affordable Green Homes International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael P Vahl, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Affordable Green Homes International, Inc.








AFFORDABLE GREEN HOMES INTERNATIONALDated: November 13, 2009
By:
/s/ Michael P VahlCEO/President
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-1872 

LT Case No. 2021-DR-1709

_____________________________ 

RYAN ALAN COX, 

Appellant, 

v.

LORRAINE MARIE COX, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. 

Thomas R. Eineman, Judge. 

Scott Timothy Smith, of Scott Timothy Smith, PA, Brooksville, 

for Appellant. 

Lorraine Marie Cox, Ladoga, IN, pro se. 

March 19, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

WALLIS, HARRIS and MACIVER, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________