alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11






<PAGE>



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                                                   EXHIBIT 11


              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                            Three Months Ended            Six Months Ended
                                               September 30,                September 30,
                                           ----------------------       ---------------------
                                             1995         1996            1995         1996
                                           --------     ---------       ---------  ----------
Weighted average common
<S>                                     <C>            <C>            <C>          <C>    
       shares outstanding                  515,125       515,125        515,125      515,125
Average unallocated ESOP
       shares                              (39,150)      (35,029)       (39,150)     (35,029)
Weighted average treasury
       shares purchased                                  (54,966)                    (48,095)

Common stock equivalents                   475,975       424,950        475,975      432,001
                                          ========      ========       ========     ========

Net earnings                            $   63,280    $  (30,348)     $ 260,471    $ 101,864
                                          ========      ========       ========     ========

Per share amount                        $      .13    $     (.07)     $     .54    $     .23
                                          ========      ========       ========     ========

</TABLE>


Earnings per share have been computed on the treasury stock method.

Beginning  with the  completed  stock  offering  date of October 11,  1994,  the
Company  accounts for the 41,210 shares acquired by the Employee Stock Ownership
Plan ("ESOP") in accordance  with Statement of Position 93-6. In accordance with
this statement, shares controlled by the ESOP are not considered in the weighted
average shares outstanding until the shares are committed for allocation.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of Commercial E-Waste Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anna Chalmers, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Anna Chalmers


Anna Chalmers


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


November 16, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                            5


<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              21,628
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       283,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    342,849
<PP&E>                                              121,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                      48,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      994,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               560,295
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            26,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         10,208
<OTHER-SE>                                          79,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        994,200
<SALES>                                             684,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    684,626
<CGS>                                               408,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       408,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    406,384
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  5,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (135,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (135,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (135,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.010)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.010)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the Company) on
Form l0-Q for the period ended April 6, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C.J. Gabriel, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 8, 2009



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ C.J. Gabriel, Jr.                               
|Name: C.J. Gabriel, Jr. Its: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,506
<SECURITIES>                                       669
<RECEIVABLES>                                      543
<ALLOWANCES>                                       110
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,733
<PP&E>                                             693
<DEPRECIATION>                                     403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              937
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,574
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,118
<SALES>                                          2,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,922
<CGS>                                              726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (919)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (919)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)








</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-Q/A of Security Bank Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the Date hereof (the Report), H. Averett Walker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. McLemore, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|Date: October 19, 2005                        
|                                              
|/s/ H. Averett Walker                         
|H. Averett Walker Chief Executive Officer     
|                                              
|Date: October 19, 2005                        
|                                              
|/s/ James R. McLemore, Jr.                    
|James R. McLemore, Jr. Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Tees, Respondent, vs. Lee, Appellant.

*September 11*

October *7, 1941.*

*535
      *Francis E. McGovern*of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Harry V.*Meissner, and oral argument by *Mr. Meissner*and *Mr. Robert L.*Piper, both of Milwaukee.

FaiRCHILD, J.

The only question involved in this case is whether an April 13, 1939, contract ended appellant’s duty *536to pay respondent the balance due under a March 3, 1937, contract. Appellant admits by his statement of account of April 15, 1939, that the sum here sued for was then due. Yet his defense now is that all rights, including the credit balance due in favor of respondent, were terminated by the second contract. That contention cannot be sustained.

The oral agreement made on April 13, 1939, to extend the time of payment of the money here involved was properly allowed to be proved by the trial court' because that oral agreement does not alter, vary, or contradict the terms of a written contract and therefore does not fall under the parol-evidence rule. 20 Am. Jur. p. 963, § 1099; 3 Jones, Commentaries on Evidence (2d ed.), p. 2699, § 1484. By this parol agreement to extend the time of payment of the debt in question the parties showed clearly it was not their intention to cancel the balance due on the 1937 contract.

It is true that the balance due under the 1937 contract *could*have been disposed of in the 1939 contract, but the terms of the latter show that was not done. Outstanding sales contracts and credit accounts are dealt with in the contract of April 13, 1939, but no mention is made of the accrued balance due respondent as the result of completed cash sales. Use of the words “terminate the same *(i. e.,*the 1937 contract) and all further relations thereunder” shows that future relations under the contract were intended to be at an end. Obligations then existing were excluded from the second or 1939 contract.

It is elementary that where a contractual obligation has arisen, and it is not discharged in some manner, it continues to exist. There having been no payment of respondent’s credit balance, it is still due and owing, and we agree with respondent that the lower court’s decision is supported by the evidence and should be affirmed.

*■By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7458

ROBERT D. BROOKS, 

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

WANTONTA GOLDEN, Correctional Officer; WADE

BYRD, Lieutenant; CHARLES WILLIAMS, Sergeant;

JONATHAN BENNETT, Sergeant; JONATHAN RANDELL,

Captain; FLORENCE MAUNEY, Captain; RICHARD

BAZZEL, Warden; MICHAEL FOWLER, Grievance

Clerk; R. L. TURNER, Disciplinary Hearing

Officer sued in their individual capacity

respectively, 

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District

Judge. (6:06-cv-01234)

Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 6, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert D. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,

MCDONALD, PATRICK TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert D. Brooks appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Golden,

No. 6:06-cv-01234 (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2007). We deny Brooks’ motions

for appointment of counsel and to file an amended complaint. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-181612) pertaining to Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-181612) and Amendment No. 422 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
















Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 22, 2014
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 302

AN ACT

For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 302 ES

1 SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMI2 GRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the administration of the Im4 migration and Nationality Act, Kerantha Poole-Christian

5 shall be classified as a child within the meaning of section

6 101(b)(1)(E) of such Act, upon approval of a petition filed

7 on her behalf by Clifton or Linette Christian, citizens of

8 the United States, pursuant to section 204 of such Act.

9 (b) LIMITATION.—No natural parent, brother, or sis10 ter, if any, of Kerantha Poole-Christian shall, by virtue

11 of such relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or

12 status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 302

AN ACT

For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-11-00046-CR

______________________________

CHRISTOPHER CHARLES MEADOWS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #1

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-0886

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In the early morning hours in Kilgore, Texas, Kilgore Police Officer Joseph Harrison saw a 

vehicle driven by Christopher Charles Meadows turn off of Stone Road and use a roadway that the 

officer believed was a private driveway (the Roadway) to reach Utzman Street. Believing that 

Meadows failed to stop in the Roadway, Harrison turned on his overhead flashing lights to initiate 

a traffic stop. However, Meadows did not stop, but continued to drive until he reached his nearby 

home. After seeing signs that Meadows was intoxicated, Harrison arrested him. Meadows 

refused a breathalyzer test, so Harrison obtained a search warrant for a sample of Meadows’ blood. 

Because the hospital in Kilgore was closed, Harrison transported Meadows to a hospital in 

Longview, where his blood was drawn. Tests revealed that Meadows was legally intoxicated, 

and he was charged by information with DWI, second offense, and fleeing from a police officer. 

After the trial court denied his motion to suppress the evidence gained from the stop and search, 

Meadows pled guilty to both charges.1

Meadows appeals from his conviction for DWI, second offense, arguing that the trial court 

erred by failing to grant his motion to suppress because: (1) the officer lacked reasonable 

suspicion to stop him, as the Roadway was a public road; (2) the officer lacked reasonable 

suspicion to stop him, as Meadows could have stopped in the Roadway; and (3) the blood draw 

exceeded the officer’s geographic jurisdiction. 

 

1There is a companion case to this (our cause number 06-11-00045-CR) which regards the charge of fleeing. 

Meadows was tried for both cases in a single proceeding.
3

We affirm the judgment of the trial court because: (1) the officer had reasonable 

suspicion to believe the Roadway was a parking lot, driveway, or private road; (2) the officer had 

reasonable suspicion to believe that Meadows failed to stop while traversing the Roadway; and 

(3) a city police officer may execute a valid search warrant anywhere in the county. 

Because the issues raised in each appeal are identical, for the reasons stated in our opinion 

dated this day in Meadows v. State, cause number 06-11-00045-CR, we affirm the judgment of the 

trial court.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: October 19, 2011

Date Decided: November 15, 2011

Do Not Publish
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 1, 2012

t0125 

# Order

February 1, 2012

143645

THOMAS M. KOHLOFF, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143645 COA: 300801 WCAC: 08-000185 CHRYSLER GROUP, L.L.C., f/k/a DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 19, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000925178        
<NAME>                                 MOVIE GALLERY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-06-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-06-1997
<CASH>                                               1,050                                            
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0 
<INVENTORY>                                         10,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    16,687
<PP&E>                                             258,019<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     111,458<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     261,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               27,151
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                13
<OTHER-SE>                                         147,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       261,429
<SALES>                                             19,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   127,006
<CGS>                                               11,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      122,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,441
<INCOME-TAX>                                           648
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    793
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.06

<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES $183,416 OF VIDEOCASSETTE RENTAL INVENTORY.
<F2> INCLUDES $89,863 OF ACCUMULATED AMORTIZATION ON VIDEOCASSETTE RENTAL
     INVENTORY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**ORDER**

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3 - 0 447 JEFFREY L. HARDMAN ,

Petitioner and Appellant , v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 2 4 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve his opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 18 2024

01/18/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0447