alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 453 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 47
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 453

                          [Report No. 106-113]


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1999

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             April 27, 1999

       Committed to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
  To designate the Federal building located at 709 West 9th Street in 
     Juneau, Alaska, as the ``Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HURFF A. SAUNDERS FEDERAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building located at 709 West 9th Street in Juneau, 
Alaska, shall be known and designated as the ``Hurff A. Saunders 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Hurff A. Saunders 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the Senate March 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 47

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 453

                          [Report No. 106-113]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the Federal building located at 709 West 9th Street in 
     Juneau, Alaska, as the ``Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 27, 1999

       Committed to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1A              8783043.21       8533845.69                0       282471153.96
A1B             26769986.82                0                0          835257000
A1C              1263123.78                0                0           39106000
A2                1272900.3                0                0           39106000
A3               2600582.28                0                0           78213000
A4                793083.18                0                0           23464000
B1               2432009.04                0                0           70391000
B2                850821.95                0                0           23464000
B3                567226.73                0                0           15643000
B4               2410650.12                0                0           66481000
B5                   492723                0                0           15642000
B6                   862281                0                0           27374000
B7                 492754.5                0                0           15643000
C                 736078.87                0             0.35           23464441
D1                        0                0                0                  0
D2                        0                0                0                  0
R1                        0                0                0                  0
R2                        0                0                0                  0
R3                        0                0                0                  0
S                   6263568                0                0                  0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,213
<PP&E>                                          15,160
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                     (81,513)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,510
<SALES>                                          1,317
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,317
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (33,650)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (33,650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (33,650)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.62)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 

 

The Board of Directors 

Resource Bankshares Corporation 

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 373-101522 on form S-8 dated November 27, 2002, Registration Statement No. 333-68746 on Form S-8 dated August 31, 2001, Registration Statement No. 333-70412 on Form S-8 dated September 28,2001, Registration Statement No. 333-80493 dated June 11, 1999 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-58417 dated July 2, 1998 on Form S-8 of Resource Bankshares Corporation of our report dated January 31, 2004, relating to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Resource Bankshares Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10K of Resource Bankshares Corporation. 

 

/s/ Goodman & Company, L.L.P. 

 

Norfolk, Virginia 

March 12, 2004
#### LEONE MANAGEMENT CORP. *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWN OF WEST NEW YORK *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. LEONE MANAGEMENT CORP. *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. SAMO HOLDING CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. JUSTIN C. HARRIS *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. BELFER REALTY ASSOCIATES, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued September 14, 1976

Decided October 15, 1976.

*354Before Judges Loba, Cbane and Michels.

*Mr. Laurence B. Orloff*argued the cause for appellants Leone Management Corp., et al, *(Messrs. Orloff, Lowenbach, Stifelman*and Siegel, attorneys).

*Mr. Sheppard A. Guryan*argued the cause for appellants Justin C. Harris *et al,*and Saino Holding Corp. *(Messrs. Lasser, Lasser, Sarokin*and *Hochman,*attorneys).

*Mr. Robert Feldman*argued the cause for appellants Bel-fer Realty Associates, etc. *(Messrs. Wotfberg, Elgart, Schwartz, Van Sickle*and *Feldman,*attorneys).

*Mr. Leon S. Wolk*argued the cause for respondents Mayor and Board of Commissioners of the Township of North Bergen, et al.

Per Curiam.

A stipulation of dismissal of appeal in the consolidated cases involving the Town of West New York having been filed with the clerk of .the court, said cases are no longer a part of this appeal.

We affirm the judgment of the Law Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Larner published in 130 *N. J. Super.*569 (Law Div. 1974), in his oral opinions of April 14, 1975 and May 14, 1975, and in his letter opinion of May 7, 1975. Additionally, reference is made to *Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town Council,*68 *N. J.*543 (1975); *Brunetti v. New Milford,*68 *N. J.*576 (1975), and *Troy Hills Village v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp. Council,*68 *N. J.*604 (1975), decided December 11, 1975 and which are dispositive of several of the issues raised on this appeal.
|   | I, John C. Barpoulis, certify that: |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of USEC Inc.; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April 30, 2013 | /s/ John C. Barpoulis                             |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|           | John C. Barpoulis                                 |
|           | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form l0-Q for the period ended July 2, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. T. Malugen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods covered in the report.


Date:  August 15, 2006


/s/  J. T. Malugen
------------------------------------
Name:  J. T. Malugen
Its:  Chief Executive Officer
NO. SCWC-29539
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
SHILO WILLIS, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. CRAIG SWAIN, FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY OF HAWAII, LTD.,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 29539; CIV. NO. 01-1-0467)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Chang, assigned by reason of vacancy) The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on May 7, 2012 by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Shilo Willis, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 19, 2012. Fernando L. Cosio, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Bradford F.K. Bliss, for respondent /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Gary W.B. Chang Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29539 19-JUN-2012 10:24 AM
Order entered March 12, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00126-CV

Sheik Tehuti, Appellant

V.

Trans-Atlas Financial, Inc., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-06496-C

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for court order for deposit and motion for court order judicial order 

for deposit are DENIED.

All motions pending at this time in this case are DENIED.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.2

   Statement of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume, the Chief Financial Officer of clickNsettle.com,
Inc. (the "Issuer"), does hereby certify that:

      (iii) the Issuer's quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
            March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
            of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934; and

      (iv)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

Dated:  May 12, 2003


                                     /s/ Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume - Vice President,
                                     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             402
<SECURITIES>                                     3,266
<RECEIVABLES>                                      552
<ALLOWANCES>                                        80
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,228
<PP&E>                                             444
<DEPRECIATION>                                     186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              574
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,537
<SALES>                                          1,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,975
<CGS>                                              505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (230)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (230)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
#### Charles Kelly, relator, *vs.*John I. Hall, Judge, respondent.

It Would require a very strong case to authorize this Court to grant a *mandamus*to compel the Judge of the Superior Court to sign and certify a bill of exceptions to its judgment in overruling a second motion for a new trial, after the ease had been heard before this Court and a new trial refused.

Practice before the Supreme Court. *Mandamus.*New-trial. Rill of exceptions. Before the Supreme Court. January Term, 1874.

Charles Kelly petitioned the Supreme Court for a *mandamus nisi*requiring Honorable John I. Hall, Judge of the Superior Courts of the Flint Circuit, to show cause why he should not be compelled by a rule absolute to sign and certify a bill of exceptions to his judgment refusing a new trial in the case of the State against petitioner, who was charged with the offense of murder.

It appeared from the petition that Kelly was convicted of the offense of murder at the September adjourned term, 1872, of Newton Superior Court; that a motion for a new trial was made and overruled, and that said judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court; that, at the September adjourned term, 1873, a second motion was made for a new trial, on the ground that Hulbert Brown, a material witness for the State, since the trial, had made an affidavit to facts differing from his testimony given in from the stand, and tending to sustain the *alibi*relied upon by petitioner, and because of certain irregularities in the conduct of the jury.

The motion was overruled. A bill of exceptions to this judgment was presented to the presiding Judge, who returned it, with the following entry thereon :

*“*My signature and certificate to the within bill of exceptions is refused, this being the second motion for a new trial in the case, and the evidence herein contained showing plainly that no harm could possibly have resulted to the defendant from the irregularities complained of.”

*637A. M. Speer; J. J. Floyd, for tlie relator.

No appearance for respondent.

Warner, Chief Justice.

This is an application for a *mandamus*to compel the Judge of the Superior Court to sign and certify a bill of exceptions to the judgment of that Court in overruling a second motion for a new trial. The granting or refusing the *mandamus*prayed for must necessarily rest in the sound legal discretion of this Court: *Harris vs. The State,*2 *Kelly’s Reports,*290; *Malone vs. The State,*decided at the last term. It would require a very strong case, indeed, to authorize this Court to grant a *mandamus*to compel the Judge of the Superior Court to sign and certify a bill of exceptions to its judgment in overruling a second motion for a new trial after the case has been heard before this Court and a new trial refused — much stronger than the one made by the facts alleged in this application.

Let the judgment refusing the application be entered on the minutes of the Court.
#### Armstrong v. Killen.

1. Assignment of Errors: too indefinite. Errors not assigned with the exactness required by § 3207 of the Code will not be considered on appeal.

2. Practice on Appeal: instructions: when not reviewed. Instructions will not be reviewed where it is stated in an amended abstract, not denied, that “ no exceptions were taken to the instructions, as appears from the record,” and no transcript is on file.

*Appeal from Story District- Court.*

Tuesday, October 26.

Aotion at law to -recover the reasonable value of work and labor performed by the plaintiff for the defendant. Trial by jury. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant-appeals.

*Martin do Sellers,*for appellant.

*Dyer dk*Fitehpatrich, for appellee.

*52Seevers, J.

The errors assigned are: (1) Tbe verdict is contrary to law. (2) The verdict is contrary to the evidence. (3) The court erred in admitting testimony on the trial. (4) The court erred in excluding testimony on the trial. (5) The court erred in the instructions given to the jury. (6) The court erred in permitting the plaintiff to amend her petition. (7) The court erred in overruling defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment, and for a new trial.

Counsel for the appellee insists that the assignments of error are not sufficiently specific. This is clearly so as to the first, third, fourth and seventh assignments, (Code, § 3207,) and no further consideration of such assignments is required.

Conceding that the fifth is sufficiently specific, we cannot consider it, because the am ended,> abstract states that “no exceptions were taken to the instructions of the court, as appears from the record.” This is a denial of the abstract, and, if true, all the appellee could say. Its correctness must be presumed, because it is in no respect denied or avoided, and there is no transcript on file. There was no error in permitting the plaintiff to file an amended petition to conform the pleadings to the proof, and we are unable to say that the vei’diet is contrary to the evidence.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-597 and 731-TA-1407 (Review)]


Cast Iron Soil Pipe From China Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty 
orders on cast iron soil pipe from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on April 1, 2024 (89 FR 
22448) and determined on July 5, 2024 that it would conduct expedited 
reviews (89 FR 68202, August 23, 2024).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on October 18, 2024. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5555 (October 2024), 
entitled Cast Iron Soil Pipe from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-597 
and 731-TA-1407 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: October 18, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-24637 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P