alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Toni A. Eldred, President and Chief Executive Officer of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 12, 2007 /s/ Toni A. EldredToni A. Eldred
Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Marvin’s Place, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Georgette Mathers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 By:           /s/Georgette Mathers
 Georgette Mathers
 Chief Executive Officer
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 Dated: August 11, 2009
   
 This certification accompanies this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Marvin’s Place, Inc. and will be retained and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 85225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The cooperative agreement applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; BPN Small Molecule and Biologic 
Therapeutic Drug Discovery for Disorders of the Nervous System.
    Date: November 19-20, 2024.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Eric S. Tucker, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-827-0799, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5c0d7ccc68bd1d0c6cec0d7e5cbcccd8bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6603140f05481213050d031426080f0e48010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).

    Dated: October 22, 2024.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-24881 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.1




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Yongye International, Inc.. (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of the
Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      November 9, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/
      Zishen WuZishen
      WuPresident
      and CEODated:
      November 9, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/
      Sam YuSam
      YuChief
      Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50182 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE FLORES-SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-00-CR-437-1

--------------------

August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Flores-Sanchez appeals the 70-month term of

imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of

being found in the United States after removal in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326. Flores-Sanchez argues that his sentence should

not have exceeded the two-year maximum term of imprisonment

prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Flores-Sanchez acknowledges

that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision

in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but
No. 01-50182 

-2-

seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of

the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). FloresSanchez’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Final Action on Reconsideration of EPA’s Interpretive Memorandum Addressing Pollutants Covered by Preventi on of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit Program under the Clean Air Act

Key Points Addressed in Document 1. Time when PSD permit program will apply to GHGs 2. No grandfathering for pending PSD permit applications 3. Final position on PSD interpretive issue 4. Clarification on approach to Title V permits 5. Foreshadowing of additional actions

Background on the overall issue (if needed)

Analysis of Proposed and Alternative In terpretations for Subject to Regulation 1. Actual Control Interpretation 2. Monitoring and Reporting Interpretation 3. State Implementation Plan (SIP) Interpretation 4. Endangerment Finding Interpretation 5. Section 209 Waiver Interpretation

Timing of When a Pollutant B ecomes Subject to Regulation

Application of PSD Interpretive Memo to Permitting for GHGs 1. Date by Which GHGs Will Be “Subject to Regulation” 2. Implementation Concerns 3. Interim EPA Policy to Mitigate Concerns Regarding GHG Emissions from Construction or Modification of Large Stationary Sources 4. Transition for Pending Permit Applications

Other Issues Which EPA Solicited Comment On 1. Prospective Codification of Interpretation

2. Section 821 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

PSD Program Implementation by EPA and States

Application of the Title V Pr ogram to Sources of GHGs
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 24, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 392 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-92, K2025-90.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24614 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO15 U. S. C. §7241AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, J.T. Malugen, certify that:

 

# **1.**                                       I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form l0-Q of Movie Gallery, Inc.;

 

# **2.**                                       Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

# **3.**                                       Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

# **4.**                                       The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)  disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

# **5.**                                       The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a)  all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

## **(b)**  any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 20, 2003  |
|-----------------------------------|
|                              |
|                              |
| /s/  J. T. Malugen           |   |
| J. T. Malugen                     |
| Chief Executive Officer           |

 

1

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SEEC, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2002 (the "Report"), the
undersigned , in the capacities and dates listed below, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:  November 12, 2002                                /s/ RAVINDRA KOKA
                                                --------------------------------
                                                          Ravindra Koka
                                                   President, Chief Executive
                                                      Officer and Director


Date:  November 12, 2002                            /s/ RICHARD J. GOLDBACH
                                                --------------------------------
                                                       Richard J. Goldbach
                                                       Treasurer and Chief
                                                        Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEEC, INC.
UNDAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000925524
<NAME> SEEC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      21,176,003
<SECURITIES>                                 8,300,583
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,100,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (157,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,841,412
<PP&E>                                       1,569,635
<DEPRECIATION>                               (263,860)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,710,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,181,485
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,802
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,468,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,710,686
<SALES>                                      3,268,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,074,960
<CGS>                                          194,759
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,677,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,667,892
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               125,814
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                578,073
<INCOME-TAX>                                   220,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            358,073
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   358,073
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 22, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30206

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEVIN LAMAR BROOKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:04-CR-50066 

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kevin Lamar Brooks appeals his jury-trial conviction for

being a felon in possession of a firearm. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 

He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his

conviction. 

Because Brooks failed to renew his Fed. R. Crim. P. 29

motion, this court reviews the sufficiency of evidence “not under

the usual standard of review for claims of insufficiency of

evidence but rather under a much stricter standard.” United

States v. Ruiz, 860 F.2d 615, 617 (5th Cir. 1988). The court is
No. 05-30206

-2-

limited to determining “whether there was a manifest miscarriage

of justice.” Id. (citation and internal quotation marks

omitted). 

Brooks argues that the Government did not demonstrate beyond

a reasonable doubt that he actually knew about and possessed the

firearm, which was found between the mattress and box springs of

a bed. However, there was testimony that Brooks, who was

physically present in the residence when the firearm was

discovered by law enforcement officers, admitted that the firearm

was his. There was also evidence that Brooks’s driver’s license

was found in a drawer in the same bedroom as the firearm, and

that mail was sent to Brooks at the residence. The evidence

adduced at trial was sufficient to establish Brooks’s possession

of the firearm. See United States v. Mergerson, 4 F.3d 337, 349

(5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED.