82566 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 198 / Friday, October 11, 2024 / Notices 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 89 

FR 47525 (June 3, 2024). 

3See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Notice 

of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 14, 2024. 

4 Id. at 2. 

5See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, 

‘‘Domestic Industry Substantive Response,’’ dated 

June 28, 2024. 

6See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on June 3, 2024,’’ dated July 23, 2024. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Third Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Raw Flexible Magnets from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 On June 14, 2024, Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

from Magnum Magnetics Corporation 

(the domestic interested party), within 

the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic 

interested party claimed interested party 

status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act 

as a U.S. producer of the domestic like 

product.4

On June 28, 2024, Commerce received 

an adequate substantive response from 

the domestic interested party within the 

30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).5 Commerce did not 

receive a substantive response from any 

other interested party in this 

proceeding, and no party requested a 

hearing. On July 23, 2024, Commerce 

notified the U.S. International Trade 

Commission that it did not receive an 

adequate substantive response from 

respondent interested parties.6 As a 

result, Commerce conducted an 

expedited (120-day) sunset review of the 

Order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii) 

(C)(2). 

On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled 

certain deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.7 The 

deadline for the final results is now 

October 8, 2024. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is raw flexible magnets. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.8

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of countervailable subsidies 

in the event of revocation of the Order 

and the countervailable subsidy rates 

likely to prevail if the Order were 

revoked, is provided in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

topics discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS), which is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) 

of the Act, we determine that revocation 

of the Order would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of a 

countervailable subsidies at the 

following net countervailable subsidy 

rates: 

Producers/exporters 

Net 

countervailable 

subsidy rate 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

China Ningbo Cixi Import Export Corporation ................ 109.95 

Polyflex Magnets Ltd ............ 109.95 

All Others .............................. 109.95 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a violation 

subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218. 

Dated: October 7, 2024. 

Dawn Shackleford, 

Executive Director for Trade Agreements 

Policy and Negotiations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates 

Likely to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–23567 Filed 10–10–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–882] 

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

From the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that countervailable 

subsidies were provided to producers 

and exporters of certain cold-rolled steel 

flat products (cold-rolled steel) from the 

Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of 

review (POR) is January 1, 2022, 

through December 31, 2022. In addition, 

Commerce is rescinding the review, in 

part, with respect to 45 companies. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable October 11, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Samuel Evans, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2420. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 15, 2023, based on 

timely requests for review, Commerce 

initiated this administrative review of 

the countervailing duty (CVD) order on 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 198 / Friday, October 11, 2024 / Notices 82567 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

78308 (November 15, 2023). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated December 18, 2023. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of 2022 Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated May 9, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022: Certain Cold-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

6See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Brazil, India, and the Republic of Korea: Amended 

Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination and Countervailing Duty Order (the 

Republic of Korea) and Countervailing Duty Orders 

(Brazil and India), 81 FR 64436 (September 20, 

2016) (Order). 

7See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Partial Withdrawal of 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

February 13, 2024, at 1–3. 

8See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the 

Republic of Korea: Rescission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 24758 

(April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy 

Steel Cut-to Length Plate from the Federal Republic 

of Germany: Recission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 4157 

(January 24, 2023). 

9See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). 

10See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

11See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review, In Part,’’ dated December 20, 2023 (Intent 

to Rescind Memorandum). 

12See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

13See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results 

of the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 37386, 37387 (June 

29, 2010). 

cold-rolled steel from Korea.1 On 

December 18, 2023, Commerce selected 

Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai 

Steel) and POSCO/POSCO International 

Corporation (POSCO) as the mandatory 

respondents in this review.2 On May 9, 

2024, Commerce extended the deadline 

for the preliminary results of this 

review.3 On July 22, 2024, Commerce 

tolled certain deadlines in this 

administrative proceedings by seven 

days.4 The deadline for the preliminary 

results is now October 4, 2024. 

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.5 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as Appendix 

I to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http:// 

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 6

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is cold-rolled steel from Korea. 

For a complete description of the scope 

of the Order, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind 

an administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party who requested the review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review in the 

Federal Register. On February 13, 2024, 

the petitioners withdrew their requests 

for review by the 90-day withdrawal 

deadline for the companies identified in 

Appendix II.7 Because the petitioners 

timely withdrew their requests for a 

review of these companies, and no other 

party requested a review of them, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce is rescinding this review, in 

part, with respect to these companies. 

Furthermore, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3), Commerce will rescind 

an administrative review when there are 

no entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR for which liquidation is 

suspended.8 Normally, upon 

completion of an administrative review, 

the suspended entries are liquidated at 

the antidumping duty assessment rate 

calculated for the review period.9

Therefore, for an administrative review 

of a company to be conducted, there 

must be a suspended entry that 

Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate 

at the antidumping duty assessment rate 

calculated for the POR.10

On December 20, 2023, we notified 

parties, and invited comment, of our 

intent to rescind this administrative 

review with respect to certain 

companies because there were no 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise produced or exported by 

these companies during the POR.11 No 

party commented on the Intent to 

Rescind Memorandum. Therefore, in the 

absence of any suspended entries of 

subject merchandise from the three 

companies identified in Appendix II, we 

are rescinding the administrative review 

for the three companies in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial 

contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that 

gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, 

and that the subsidy is specific.12 For a 

full description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Examined Company 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

rate to apply to companies not selected 

for individual examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 705(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a CVD 

investigation, for guidance when 

determining the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Section 777A(e)(2) of the Act 

provides that ‘‘the individual 

countervailable subsidy rates 

determined under subparagraph (A) 

shall be used to determine the all-others 

rate under section 705(c)(5) {of the 

Act}.’’ Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act 

states that for companies not 

investigated, in general, we will 

determine an all-others rate by weight 

averaging the countervailable subsidy 

rates established for each of the 

companies individually investigated, 

excluding zero and de minimis rates or 

any rates based entirely on facts 

available. 

Accordingly, to determine the rate for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination, Commerce’s practice is to 

weight average the net subsidy rates for 

the selected mandatory respondents, 

excluding rates that are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available.13 In this administrative 

review, Commerce calculated 

preliminary individual estimated 

countervailable subsidy rates for 

Hyundai Steel and POSCO that are not 

zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 

facts otherwise available. Therefore, 

Commerce preliminarily calculated the 

rate assigned to KG Dongbu Steel Co., 

Ltd. using a weighted average of the 

individual estimated subsidy rates 

calculated for the examined respondents 

using each company’s public ranged 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
82568 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 198 / Friday, October 11, 2024 / Notices 

14With two respondents under examination, 

Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weightedaverage of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for 

the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of 

the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the 

examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average 

of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the 

examined respondents using each company’s 

publicly-ranged U.S. sale values for the 

merchandise under consideration. Commerce then 

compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate 

closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all 

other producers and exporters. See, e.g., Ball 

Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, 

Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final 

Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and 

Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662 

(September 1, 2010), and accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 1. As complete 

publicly ranged sales data were available, 

Commerce based the review-specific rate on the 

publicly ranged sales data of the mandatory 

respondents. For a complete analysis of the data, 

see Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of Subsidy Rate for 

Company Not Selected for Individual 

Examination,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 

15As discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, Commerce has found the following 

companies to be cross-owned with POSCO: POSCO 

Chemical Co., Ltd., POSCO M-Tech, Pohang Scrap 

Recycling Distribution Center Co., Ltd., POSCO 

Nippon Steel RHF Joint Venture Co., Ltd., POSCO 

Holdings, and POSCO Mobility Solutions. We note 

that POSCO has an affiliated trading company 

through which it exported certain subject 

merchandise, POSCO International Corporation 

(POSCO International). POSCO International was 

not selected as a mandatory respondent but was 

examined in the context of POSCO and POSCO 

International’s subsidies are accounted for in 

POSCO’s total subsidy rate. 

16As discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, Commerce has found the following 

companies to be cross-owned with Hyundai Steel: 

Hyundai Green Power Co., Ltd. and Hyundai ITC 

Co., Ltd. 

17See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Service Procedures). 18See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 19We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

20See APO and Service Procedures. 

21See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

values for the merchandise under 

consideration.14

Preliminary Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine the net 

countervailable subsidy rates for the 

period January 1, 2022, through 

December 31, 2022, to be: 

Company 

Subsidy rate 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

POSCO/POSCO International Corporation 15 ...... 1.48 

Hyundai Steel Company 16 ... 2.21 

KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd ... 1.73 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose its 

calculations and analysis performed to 

interested parties for these preliminary 

results within five days of any public 

announcement or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

to Commerce no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice. 

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed not later 

than five days after the date for filing 

case briefs.17 Interested parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding must submit: (1) a table 

of contents listing each issue; and (2) a 

table of authorities.18

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their briefs that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.19 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that will 

accompany the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).20

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain: (1) the party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. Oral 

presentations at the hearing will be 

limited to issues raised in the briefs. If 

a request for a hearing is made, 

Commerce will inform parties of the 

scheduled date for the hearing.21

Unless the deadline in extended, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), we intend 

to issue the final results of this 

administrative review, including the 

results of our analysis of the issues 

raised by the parties in any written 

briefs, no later than 120 days after the 

date of publication of these preliminary 

results in the Federal Register. 

Assessment Rates 

Consistent with section 751(a)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), upon 

issuance of the final results, Commerce 

shall determine, and CBP shall assess, 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP 

to collect cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties in the amount 

indicated above with regard to 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. For all non-reviewed firms, we 

will instruct CBP to continue to collect 

cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties at the most recent 

company-specific or all-others rate 

applicable to the company, as 

appropriate. These cash deposit 

instructions, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: October 4, 2024. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Subsidies Valuation Information 

V. Benchmarks and Interest Rates 

VI. Analysis of Programs 

VII. Recommendation 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 198 / Friday, October 11, 2024 / Notices 82569 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China; 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the 

People’s Republic of China; and Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 

(September 28, 2006) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 88 FR 60923 (September 6, 

2023). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

78298 (November 15, 2023) (Initiation Notice). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated May 28, 2024. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India; 2022–2023,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

7See Initiation Notice, 88 FR at 78300. 

8The correct name of the company is ITC 

Limited, whereas the Initiation Notice uses the 

name ‘‘ITC Limited-Education and Stationary 

Products Business,’’ which is a division of ITC 

Limited, and not a legal entity. See Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India: Amended Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2021, 88 FR 28493, 28494 (May 4, 2023); see also 

Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ dated 

February 23, 2024 (Respondent Selection 

Memorandum). 

9See Respondent Selection Memorandum at 2, 

n.6. 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review, In Part,’’ dated March 21, 2024 (Intent to 

Rescind Memorandum). 

Appendix II 

Rescission Based on Withdrawal of Review 

Requests 

1. AJU Steel Co., Ltd. 

2. Amerisource Korea 

3. Amerisource International 

4. BC Trade 

5. Busung Steel Co., Ltd. 

6. Cenit Co., Ltd. 

7. Daewoo Logistics Corp. 

8. Dai Yang Metal Co., Ltd. 

9. DK GNS Co., Ltd. 

10. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. 

11. Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. 

12. Dong Jin Machinery 

13. Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd. 

14. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. 

15. Eunsan Shipping and Air Cargo Co., Ltd. 

16. Euro Line Global Co., Ltd. 

17. Golden State Corp. 

18. GS Global Corp. 

19. Hanawell Co., Ltd. 

20. Hankum Co., Ltd. 

21. Hyosung TNC Corp. 

22. Hyuk San Profile Co., Ltd. 

23. Iljin NTS Co., Ltd. 

24. Iljin Steel Corp. 

25. Jeen Pung Industrial Co., Ltd. 

26. JS Steel Co., Ltd. 

27. JT Solution 

28. Kolon Global Corporation. 

29. Nauri Logistics Co., Ltd. 

30. Okaya (Korea) Co., Ltd. 

31. PL Special Steel Co., Ltd. 

32. Samsung C&T Corp. 

33. Samsung STS Co., Ltd. 

34. SeAH Steel Corp. 

35. SM Automotive Ltd. 

36. SK Networks Co., Ltd. 

37. Taihan Electric Wire Co., Ltd. 

38. TGS Pipe Co., Ltd. 

39. TI Automotive Ltd. 

40. Topco Global Co., Ltd. 

41. Xeno Energy 

42. Young Steel Co., Ltd. 

Rescission Based on No Suspended Entries 

43. Hyundai Group; 

44. POSCO C&C Co., Ltd.; 

45. POSCO Daewoo Corp. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23565 Filed 10–10–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–843] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Preliminary Results and 

Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2022– 

2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that certain lined paper 

products (lined paper) from India are 

not being sold in the United States at 

below normal value during the period of 

review (POR), September 1, 2022, 

through August 31, 2023. Additionally, 

Commerce is rescinding this 

administrative review with respect to 

certain companies. We invite interested 

parties to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable October 11, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick Barton, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0012. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 28, 2006, Commerce 

published the antidumping duty order 

on lined paper from India.1 On 

September 6, 2023, we published in the 

Federal Register a notice of opportunity 

to request an administrative review of 

the Order.2 On November 15, 2023, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

Commerce initiated an administrative 

review of the Order covering 11 

entities.3 On May 28, 2024, Commerce 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results until September 27, 

2024.4 On July 22, 2024, Commerce 

tolled certain deadlines in this 

administrative proceeding by seven 

days.5 The deadline for the preliminary 

results is now October 4, 2024. 

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.6 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is attached as Appendix 

I to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://access.

trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this Order 

are lined paper from India. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Rescission of Review, in Part 

As noted above, we initiated this 

review with respect to 11 companies.7

During the course of the review, we 

selected two mandatory respondents, 

ITC Limited 8 and Navneet Education 

Ltd. (Navneet).9 As a consequence, there 

are nine companies upon which a 

review was requested and which were 

not selected for individual examination. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review when there are no 

reviewable suspended entries. Based on 

our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) information, three 

companies listed in the Initiation Notice 

had no entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR. On March 21, 2024, we 

notified parties of our intent to rescind 

this administrative review with respect 

to the three companies that had no 

reviewable suspended entries during the 

POR.10 No party to the proceeding 

provided comments on our Intent to 

Rescind Memorandum. As a result, we 

are rescinding this review, in part, with 

respect to the three entities which had 

no entries in the POR and for which 

withdrawal requests were not 

previously received from all parties 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1